{"meta":{"query_hash":"25201e07f843","filters":{"topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics"},"cohort_total":1177,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":1177,"exported":1177,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/25201e07f843","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Decision-Making+and+Behavioral+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W1035079886","doi":"10.1016/j.jom.2015.07.003","title":"How analytic reasoning style and global thinking relate to understanding stocks and flows","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Operations Management","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Stock (firearms); Stock management; Computer science; Cognition; Operations research; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1809101295181473,"score_gpt":0.39032180044424364,"score_spread":0.20941167092609633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1035079886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99381435,0.000073387375,0.0014558589,0.00015374713,0.0000056423323,0.000018657247,0.000023731376,0.000010461167,0.0044441056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976997,0.00008705235,0.001698036,0.000042388478,0.0000052453347,0.000014497757,0.00005607635,0.000005167363,0.00039186206],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866164,0.00053941534,0.0000928941,0.00020509816,0.00035942093,0.00014161499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972728,0.017917808,0.005371426,0.0011866484,0.0014174334,0.0013786732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035704277,0.0005172712,0.00026692718,0.0013473507,0.00035129004,0.0041948515,0.00047348047,0.0006176202,0.0039316537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02658365,0.00024907527,0.0003792591,0.0006227137,0.0012099924,0.0025276032,0.0010994299,0.001134217,0.00028278716],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006084826,0.0016585258,0.867264,0.00024311813,0.000543958,0.00027004487,0.01765736,0.011187402,0.004693354,0.010513406,0.0014280604,0.08393233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014222272,0.0007698716,0.88196516,0.0002498306,0.00024381671,0.00033567604,0.013948926,0.042658694,0.0023752307,0.05463271,0.002529083,0.0001487959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018818008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018492857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041948515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005171211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005951089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018882453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W132620350","doi":"10.1016/s0065-2407(08)00006-2","title":"The Development of Rational Thought: A Taxonomy of Heuristics and Biases","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in child development and behavior","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Heuristics; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Action (physics); Social psychology; Distraction; Computer science","score_opus":0.14724489174087024,"score_gpt":0.3751750156841011,"score_spread":0.22793012394323087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W132620350","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058668453,0.032706216,0.7903271,0.010734566,0.00023324386,0.00047351694,0.0003537233,0.00024445495,0.10625892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6186264,0.019978212,0.35591316,0.0010626285,0.00023242545,0.00083717174,0.00027369097,0.000088195025,0.0029880428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935474,0.0034227679,0.0005700797,0.00067879923,0.0014507001,0.00033034303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725575,0.020908523,0.0018624102,0.0021379066,0.0019201511,0.00061344187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0110634705,0.0010387142,0.0009639321,0.0053307135,0.0009262423,0.009247029,0.002232828,0.0022867043,0.0025564218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03714178,0.00066486635,0.001228635,0.004649826,0.015024171,0.014753213,0.0022329914,0.0032647094,0.00037872704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011803392,0.000018066536,0.0015046499,0.00017102598,0.000023408838,0.000026679381,0.0011990746,0.0022927246,0.000112264745,0.9768207,0.0003071998,0.017512461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061425467,0.000012220036,0.00042512504,0.000089620655,0.000008100107,0.00003535914,0.0002707585,0.0039228015,0.00009295889,0.99268144,0.0024452244,0.000010169225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003050676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020757664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0110634705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031092775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038725422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058509946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482089401","doi":"10.1007/s00199-022-01453-1","title":"Uncertainty and compound lotteries: calibration","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ambiguity; Ranking (information retrieval); Sophistication; Probabilistic logic; Preference; Decision maker; Calibration; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Public finance; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Statistics; Management science","score_opus":0.07113588485411494,"score_gpt":0.34808626362587763,"score_spread":0.2769503787717627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482089401","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0841573,0.0029785251,0.88844407,0.004361163,0.00029915888,0.00025913856,0.00053407945,0.00044380844,0.018522674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8788174,0.002710806,0.105486006,0.00064801495,0.00041707125,0.000461789,0.00041333455,0.00017279647,0.010872875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926145,0.004933726,0.00024836892,0.000990926,0.0007685387,0.00044391124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8928961,0.092849046,0.003808331,0.007154403,0.0023383547,0.00095377304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02040432,0.0015298453,0.0038598254,0.0017975054,0.0008798703,0.004658273,0.0037384222,0.005061972,0.012929196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14831266,0.0018009954,0.0021227198,0.002654141,0.004713179,0.012578788,0.003008169,0.0070523364,0.0011913021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023617008,0.00021444056,0.0013293439,0.00016398054,0.00011809905,0.00008261944,0.00012290316,0.337779,0.00017776442,0.6381633,0.0025277797,0.019084485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003938854,0.000023463088,0.00034789316,0.000037079008,0.000020834495,0.00004076762,0.000017281598,0.43699256,0.000086251406,0.56184316,0.0005160991,0.000035162524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005488798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002750264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02040432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032879363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025630652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10790968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486144121","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1481443","title":"How Time Preferences Differ: Evidence from 45 Countries","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory; Individualism; Time preference; Hyperbolic discounting; Discounting; Economics; Inflation (cosmology); Scale (ratio); Uncertainty avoidance; Survey data collection; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Psychology; Geography; Mathematics; Statistics; Collectivism","score_opus":0.05915660571519382,"score_gpt":0.3414524829229207,"score_spread":0.28229587720772686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486144121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992623,0.0026978708,0.000343046,0.0002184096,0.00002011415,0.0000057742645,0.0008667207,0.0000021137896,0.0032229556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972434,0.0012110308,0.00015126275,0.00009547485,0.0000096066005,0.0000069062885,0.0008533734,0.0000050108274,0.00042389947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985606,0.0006185559,0.00011884328,0.00030364777,0.00014324166,0.0002552458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882548,0.0063876775,0.0037554246,0.00067835225,0.0004965023,0.00042733923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018715836,0.00030510392,0.0004943388,0.0012107516,0.0003925715,0.0021172513,0.00039483787,0.00075694337,0.0037860957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006719309,0.00025686217,0.0007064164,0.004051195,0.00096939725,0.0010471247,0.00092705415,0.00060179515,0.00046372143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002483659,0.00024462063,0.9446991,0.000385373,0.0021892935,0.0008135915,0.0043523633,0.0023773306,0.0006285072,0.0042627887,0.0023616417,0.03520158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013188997,0.00025783258,0.982714,0.00019096042,0.0008178773,0.00032909555,0.0062655956,0.0003250376,0.0006110121,0.0018084969,0.006503629,0.00004460323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012793168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011539745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012793168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037983237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002979065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025437415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488103917","doi":"10.1023/a:1011132102314","title":"Ranked-Weighted Utilities and Qualitative Convolution","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.10997674900266957,"score_gpt":0.4204663498269124,"score_spread":0.3104896008242428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488103917","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029628804,0.00032978048,0.9643498,0.00061975943,0.00004676441,0.00005107857,0.00016968645,0.00009380498,0.00471058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72987235,0.00073142577,0.26181695,0.00024374592,0.0001233782,0.0002973558,0.00028144033,0.00009351701,0.006539884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939926,0.0040241536,0.0003083572,0.00041820234,0.0009046189,0.00035210527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752244,0.019670365,0.0012102083,0.0016792652,0.0016549374,0.0005608644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010169063,0.00080063345,0.001235292,0.0023032003,0.00068610243,0.0037984934,0.0017485315,0.001255317,0.005444018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04180975,0.0006469921,0.0014836709,0.0023006783,0.002387885,0.008612534,0.0019426644,0.0012993799,0.0004341649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056525107,0.00003109484,0.00046662535,0.000081318416,0.000036088677,0.000052513726,0.00014344692,0.039935578,0.00024205387,0.93745583,0.00064444274,0.020854533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007471841,0.000015267373,0.00010532389,0.00001725433,0.000011171958,0.000037794463,0.000033405322,0.11078218,0.0001570501,0.8884231,0.0003968248,0.000013188061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002148718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015768958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010169063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002450981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013842975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05377978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491755126","doi":"10.1023/a:1011149422763","title":"Lottery Decisions and Probability Weighting Function","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Argument (complex analysis); Mathematical economics; Function (biology); Weighting; Preference; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.08839251925516983,"score_gpt":0.3476835833279564,"score_spread":0.25929106407278657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491755126","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19943023,0.0013830018,0.7718954,0.0033157526,0.00021383479,0.00027471388,0.00025514493,0.00018182363,0.023050092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88516307,0.0010950799,0.09963025,0.00041333976,0.00020951116,0.00043801736,0.00020732617,0.00007580975,0.012767538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99366564,0.004626682,0.00027058116,0.00046920538,0.0005673797,0.00040046702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9406396,0.05329736,0.0017157539,0.0020633796,0.0013681701,0.00091572653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0140165575,0.0009561227,0.0021653664,0.002131083,0.00077858,0.0036395213,0.0016720616,0.002801401,0.011467192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063652016,0.00091449823,0.0013364296,0.0016720553,0.0024576483,0.007863002,0.0014068144,0.002181179,0.00079950434],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035882666,0.00023153498,0.0016652754,0.00015603594,0.00014646955,0.000112022804,0.000288148,0.039643623,0.00045312336,0.9171586,0.002074917,0.037711386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054017903,0.00007318644,0.00069079245,0.00002649619,0.00004666312,0.000109952336,0.000073197894,0.11630773,0.0001239411,0.88169503,0.0007659381,0.000033141438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090012414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007435803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0140165575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014685686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009584717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074127495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505479660","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1302.3603","title":"A Measure of Decision Flexibility","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Measure (data warehouse); Decision maker; Variety (cybernetics); Perspective (graphical); Computer science; Value (mathematics); Decision model; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Management science; Machine learning; Data mining","score_opus":0.3615174583195565,"score_gpt":0.30306867819917177,"score_spread":0.058448780120384736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505479660","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2745777,0.0015925306,0.6628446,0.0024333405,0.00024794118,0.00032823088,0.0009291643,0.0002879077,0.056758568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9406143,0.00023088131,0.05776455,0.0001260859,0.000073721014,0.00021234881,0.00020856499,0.000030762512,0.00073882367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864912,0.0061802366,0.00091675343,0.0018260706,0.0038431352,0.0007425587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9556387,0.027861387,0.0061731916,0.0054585515,0.0027225388,0.0021457488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012563049,0.0017236351,0.0011214606,0.004971452,0.00094584475,0.0052564545,0.0016105473,0.0020292848,0.005623176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066141136,0.00034494593,0.0016093634,0.0031040583,0.004304329,0.006794204,0.0036436545,0.0023999251,0.00047508153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006416469,0.00039063874,0.022670578,0.00044996175,0.0009560283,0.00034351042,0.0017296558,0.16129257,0.0047227484,0.6903278,0.0019003195,0.11457459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046586574,0.0006439627,0.011443151,0.00016821889,0.00011478918,0.00022454001,0.00086203835,0.1131492,0.0012724454,0.8675386,0.0043765795,0.00015985809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005912399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048959756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012563049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020135648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093565095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06644052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505811175","doi":"","title":"Friedman, Harsanyi, Rawls, Boulding - or Somebody Else?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Inequality; Veil of ignorance; Distributive justice; Ignorance; Distributive property; Social welfare function; Inequity aversion; Welfare; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Welfare economics; Economic Justice; Psychology; Mathematics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12777025388606833,"score_gpt":0.38208623443595663,"score_spread":0.2543159805498883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505811175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5388435,0.019940792,0.11294372,0.05823401,0.0015479504,0.0003386067,0.0017232822,0.0002811931,0.26614696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96286666,0.0040859426,0.014962672,0.002212291,0.00033841867,0.0002106743,0.0001880812,0.00004546958,0.015089738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985948,0.0006488762,0.00003804673,0.00025445153,0.0003440996,0.000119648415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946892,0.0030085589,0.0007278116,0.0009861612,0.00037692045,0.0002112777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052873367,0.00035682486,0.0008432789,0.00045021964,0.00063390704,0.0010942202,0.00046878634,0.0006580452,0.011463851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011402273,0.00010145409,0.00034379194,0.00074382446,0.0022001907,0.0017024502,0.0005890982,0.00097587286,0.0008346651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001302176,0.00050172565,0.019006537,0.00045592934,0.00034220738,0.00013066757,0.0013179067,0.0049082655,0.0021358558,0.57420015,0.021114416,0.37458417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021801249,0.0006232783,0.03549239,0.00018673971,0.00015894938,0.00013688514,0.0008400655,0.007181299,0.0029916787,0.8931334,0.058966722,0.00007053645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001770031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021756978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011463851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011020005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008522828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038350403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507604397","doi":"10.1002/9780470752937.ch19","title":"Framing, Loss Aversion, and Mental Accounting","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Framing effect; Mental accounting; Loss aversion; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Economics; Engineering; Microeconomics; Persuasion","score_opus":0.052492178356885834,"score_gpt":0.36587273031831746,"score_spread":0.3133805519614316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507604397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08202042,0.02330321,0.022415452,0.030648643,0.00077400095,0.000057424597,0.0003048493,0.00011654043,0.8403594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88850945,0.0253852,0.008386085,0.0019436064,0.0014056107,0.0001234897,0.00022354723,0.00005209005,0.07397085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995448,0.00024422992,0.000017013717,0.000049139122,0.00011124745,0.0000334667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976495,0.0017189817,0.00023424323,0.00015056628,0.00017049717,0.00007616892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015178258,0.0005413796,0.00033746925,0.0009045208,0.0008795542,0.004111665,0.00037986733,0.0010041967,0.01848941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063940194,0.00016649507,0.00019963241,0.001674535,0.0022789824,0.0038988169,0.0007134948,0.0017406124,0.0006329194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003870391,0.00010398263,0.0010921768,0.000073566785,0.000010097636,0.000029151732,0.0012768554,0.0008970747,0.00014876171,0.8990679,0.012718937,0.08454287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007530064,0.000012336879,0.0024507348,0.000082341336,0.000010290905,0.000026717738,0.00054410007,0.0012705458,0.00007696092,0.9779695,0.017538331,0.000010524604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025619334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024074959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01848941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012653497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064548437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06185329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509147818","doi":"10.1080/03155986.2002.11732659","title":"Une Introduction à La Modélisation Des Préférences<sup>1</sup>","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"INFOR Information Systems and Operational Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Syntax; Preference; Point (geometry); Mod; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.22007452792755702,"score_gpt":0.4202759952893328,"score_spread":0.20020146736177577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509147818","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030934943,0.10827307,0.76680696,0.017705288,0.009446938,0.00023671718,0.003097958,0.00082006573,0.09051953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10310758,0.18493205,0.5687311,0.013334835,0.026833689,0.0015597742,0.004974742,0.00081461907,0.09571162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798405,0.0008092389,0.00018412396,0.0003341694,0.0005634086,0.00012486902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972882,0.0019238674,0.0001826365,0.00022619673,0.00030095308,0.00007823699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019621947,0.0014980644,0.0009939134,0.001394727,0.0009133762,0.0034806875,0.0016402729,0.0040797265,0.02194133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004474967,0.00096874405,0.0022331497,0.0043621045,0.0023459038,0.006128018,0.001869865,0.008465196,0.01011211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007227698,0.00009100428,0.00034758617,0.0015278397,0.000050887986,0.0005137616,0.0005205545,0.007022853,0.002164577,0.825822,0.048209596,0.11365715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014288972,0.0000849431,0.0004968473,0.00047806322,0.000026631033,0.0008524893,0.00007799904,0.009705952,0.00060177903,0.3437584,0.64385223,0.000050320497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027093156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014925423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02194133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014830297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011207152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07340109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509923280","doi":"10.1111/risa.12353","title":"The Aggregation of Expert Judgment: Do Good Things Come to Those Who Weight?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Risk Analysis","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cooke Aquaculture (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"ROWE; Domain (mathematical analysis); Public domain; Psychology; Computer science; Management science; Data science; Engineering; Economics; Management; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08304401179302272,"score_gpt":0.3778362966466915,"score_spread":0.29479228485366876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509923280","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000737284,0.00023798842,0.00013505669,0.99742365,0.0016551574,0.0000021210735,0.000008615922,0.0000047435747,0.00045897276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002726543,0.00033511218,0.00034302627,0.98605865,0.00972643,0.000013162638,0.000010028554,0.00001282345,0.00077420054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97222644,0.01380443,0.0025179372,0.0029715032,0.0069057113,0.0015739886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9043518,0.06963378,0.0040578125,0.003415711,0.0146936355,0.003847161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03198226,0.00065481925,0.0016416806,0.0008688237,0.005315552,0.0069898646,0.004071398,0.06211668,0.0044866805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12658185,0.0007875226,0.0015271599,0.0011427004,0.012107245,0.00737845,0.004008665,0.07163405,0.0044985143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035740613,0.000019745296,0.0005585867,0.00004002232,0.00001622269,0.00021332834,0.00033706834,0.00006859983,0.00006870498,0.0133338375,0.97369576,0.011612418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017748843,0.00010475504,0.0028558646,0.0008656255,0.000052319534,0.0015580428,0.0021116072,0.0017820306,0.00050774263,0.1547219,0.83504313,0.00021948207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074675106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01376736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06211668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069391443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007135012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16914034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1511911043","doi":"10.15353/rea.v4i1.1538","title":"Stochastic Dominance and Comparative Risk Aversion","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Analysis","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stochastic dominance; Dominance (genetics); Econometrics; Economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Mathematics; Biology; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis","score_opus":0.17154483041347143,"score_gpt":0.43692257316964045,"score_spread":0.265377742756169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1511911043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07325777,0.27061328,0.25042742,0.02599987,0.0024674553,0.00010868187,0.0005483383,0.00018764133,0.37638956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80218744,0.12433467,0.02027813,0.0016724288,0.0030014368,0.000112469264,0.0004136608,0.000061712824,0.047937993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929655,0.00030617506,0.000027873799,0.00007806054,0.00021146753,0.00007989897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708265,0.0020297356,0.00025965998,0.00010924585,0.000389262,0.00012934179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013894406,0.00072891754,0.0012916445,0.001388809,0.00039446767,0.002203218,0.0005505927,0.0010174143,0.0150501765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051770792,0.00016529336,0.0005729694,0.0019413003,0.0018982233,0.0016469471,0.0007637583,0.0013000718,0.000943902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005630087,0.00005284944,0.0006354419,0.00066783075,0.00018456824,0.00014677054,0.00013249424,0.01676825,0.00064585876,0.8769037,0.012257947,0.091548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013604099,0.000019776318,0.00076763576,0.00016555698,0.000041906653,0.00008731231,0.000045510587,0.0044391644,0.00009712667,0.97819126,0.016117312,0.0000138394735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015238575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001197161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0150501765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011671575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009083399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050347865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514149724","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2468465","title":"Loss Aversion in the Laboratory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn","keywords":"Loss aversion; Risk aversion (psychology); Preference; Compensation (psychology); Economics; Task (project management); Experimental economics; Taste aversion; Psychology; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Expected utility hypothesis; Financial economics","score_opus":0.03458233949557936,"score_gpt":0.341083179402152,"score_spread":0.3065008399065726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514149724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96585363,0.0004363799,0.011816804,0.0011441913,0.00023756399,0.000089933215,0.00028989965,0.00031103767,0.019820502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829564,0.00032864785,0.0040415763,0.00071741134,0.00009872213,0.00016685414,0.00022181276,0.00008423826,0.011384253],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860173,0.0005097319,0.00006227404,0.00033803718,0.0003215815,0.00016677003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99521893,0.0015983429,0.00080911524,0.0013103785,0.00023624895,0.000826978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021376915,0.00089537073,0.00073757756,0.00068935397,0.0004578204,0.002043277,0.00074580085,0.0010933377,0.011625397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006871281,0.00033981292,0.00040393337,0.00029094092,0.0013624253,0.001370073,0.0014354474,0.0024613254,0.0012885971],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.028856253,0.023865951,0.03280856,0.0007806742,0.0005726189,0.0008644465,0.0016400826,0.011002181,0.6670753,0.06498194,0.018488875,0.14906311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006011174,0.048058826,0.09892339,0.0005928574,0.0014103242,0.0033219329,0.002404494,0.14344364,0.36208716,0.28070155,0.052083433,0.00096122676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094806927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007389347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011625397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007346246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009651534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03889084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514261845","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1584185","title":"Loss Aversion and Intertemporal Choice: A Laboratory Investigation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Calgary","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn","keywords":"Economics; Loss aversion; Intertemporal choice; Windfall gain; Context (archaeology); Behavioral economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.033644501839931173,"score_gpt":0.33996892568587556,"score_spread":0.3063244238459444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514261845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968112,0.000098898774,0.0019034344,0.00012944228,0.000023599892,0.000034006574,0.000057266338,0.000020853606,0.00092123984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99201185,0.00035241313,0.004314538,0.00025222873,0.00004790106,0.0001934862,0.00015231872,0.000042924476,0.002632366],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928445,0.00032034508,0.000031950254,0.00016099715,0.00013253282,0.00006977992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929777,0.0040372084,0.0009797093,0.0012712887,0.00014027099,0.0005938145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020227905,0.0008928657,0.00079883274,0.0005585438,0.0005642938,0.0014216366,0.0010476925,0.000993315,0.0042354628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061331983,0.00045126633,0.0006853176,0.00046213352,0.0017362823,0.0012655907,0.0008006518,0.0024148135,0.00031488345],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0646164,0.09816731,0.046893213,0.0006793422,0.0008149311,0.0009140136,0.0026952014,0.008850585,0.66032356,0.029446492,0.0038648013,0.08273419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01950374,0.20243621,0.09221869,0.00029559294,0.0030811273,0.0037891956,0.0028448687,0.16910216,0.39050385,0.1031145,0.012406728,0.00070324005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011213436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006058291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042354628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005649697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009278697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014169097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515016839","doi":"10.1037/per0000099","title":"Choice impulsivity: Definitions, measurement issues, and clinical implications.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Pfizer; National Institute of Mental Health; National Cancer Institute; National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; AstraZeneca; National Institute on Drug Abuse; National Center for Responsible Gaming; State of Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services; National Institutes of Health; H. Lundbeck A/S; Rush University","keywords":"Impulsivity; Psychology; Task (project management); Construct (python library); Clinical psychology; Delay discounting; Human studies; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.7271465109527111,"score_gpt":0.5608638769486375,"score_spread":0.16628263400407362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515016839","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048054975,0.718664,0.076184355,0.11991052,0.005175811,0.00064727507,0.0012132671,0.00020632986,0.029943516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53572154,0.3485007,0.08333888,0.019054106,0.006192641,0.0014901737,0.0010458217,0.00012919921,0.0045269188],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99355656,0.0034292033,0.0010249569,0.0003775827,0.0014573147,0.000154396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983524,0.010920229,0.0021065075,0.0005415157,0.0021223216,0.0007853609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016135605,0.001162499,0.0015920982,0.004767603,0.00089330436,0.00330198,0.0024011128,0.0020225595,0.0016540012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032053493,0.00041753365,0.00081594195,0.0054704677,0.005657738,0.003687026,0.0034839672,0.0060672853,0.00034715614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002658112,0.00032720852,0.10707499,0.002785995,0.00026949265,0.0010568541,0.0047763134,0.0010463536,0.0007207858,0.15299512,0.032071557,0.6966095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009878179,0.0011748272,0.29350883,0.024509871,0.00035964214,0.027480813,0.011879448,0.0078330515,0.0011551697,0.4038154,0.22775888,0.00042533624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005420392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007460099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016135605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028476461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033412408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08533424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517449658","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.977508","title":"Gender, Affect and Intertemporal Consistency: An Experimental Approach","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Consistency (knowledge bases); Mood; Patience; Intertemporal choice; Psychology; Hyperbolic discounting; Discounting; Time preference; Delay discounting; Temporal discounting; Social psychology; Economics; Econometrics; Developmental psychology; Impulsivity; Mathematics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.12037323552242123,"score_gpt":0.40336481414484554,"score_spread":0.2829915786224243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517449658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919264,0.00006179119,0.0024164664,0.00009574696,0.00015090489,0.0011530817,0.00038736328,0.00003517118,0.003773153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95442986,0.00024382539,0.017378133,0.00047167038,0.0003465244,0.010971091,0.00069447863,0.00019733646,0.015267053],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655247,0.0012097382,0.00028100592,0.0009465319,0.0007024676,0.00030788878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9718989,0.01976303,0.0028617897,0.0036846222,0.00071519834,0.0010764141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058798953,0.001573584,0.001872733,0.0007892855,0.0011179023,0.0023750677,0.002214757,0.0022413991,0.018758731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022017011,0.0013931148,0.0008437684,0.0008988943,0.0027070774,0.0016918419,0.0020394207,0.0024956283,0.0013070586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.33887935,0.25610495,0.03045689,0.0012785165,0.00074913335,0.00071523065,0.008191996,0.0061287787,0.27318922,0.027843654,0.0031590487,0.053303227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.10332304,0.43243346,0.21043296,0.00029750515,0.004884196,0.0010697186,0.0032317773,0.061274275,0.07949784,0.08692134,0.015802026,0.0008319322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010135396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090562506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018758731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091408053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009375348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06275427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517480665","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.612503","title":"Diminishing Impatience and Non-Expected Utility: A Unified Framework","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Econometrics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0528057114462755,"score_gpt":0.3590281226503948,"score_spread":0.3062224112041193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517480665","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032521077,0.0050302874,0.899298,0.0075173085,0.00028884845,0.00012369284,0.00030136053,0.0000953871,0.054824002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8704582,0.0072767795,0.09255281,0.00096076203,0.0015737289,0.000427021,0.0002122098,0.00009827975,0.02644019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951894,0.0027990753,0.0001886282,0.00059544825,0.00063032855,0.0005970925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97800964,0.0174306,0.0012862958,0.0012710311,0.0013278666,0.0006745894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008246102,0.0020680174,0.004048956,0.002596318,0.0012714543,0.0063553867,0.0058887154,0.004923258,0.007986098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025875347,0.0012480143,0.002238399,0.0025006558,0.007106781,0.01165929,0.0036934654,0.005037705,0.0008225517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010566484,0.00002854197,0.00016277815,0.00004591224,0.000027313856,0.000083166386,0.00010189106,0.008846484,0.000046401416,0.9876066,0.00057275343,0.0024676153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012753088,0.000013882373,0.00013483704,0.000022769771,0.000022645643,0.00006698039,0.000035123594,0.044816863,0.00001843184,0.95397395,0.0008670942,0.0000146298835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042273942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00346265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008246102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030871462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024371198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043610096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526201865","doi":"10.1007/s11166-017-9264-0","title":"Learning-by-doing in an ambiguous environment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ambiguity; Ambiguity aversion; Expected utility hypothesis; Session (web analytics); Measure (data warehouse); Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Actuarial science; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.05447298923000997,"score_gpt":0.36696709040145403,"score_spread":0.31249410117144405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526201865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8678303,0.0003673217,0.10251272,0.0037185312,0.00009637404,0.00006659979,0.00008906921,0.00007154381,0.025247542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943558,0.0001344505,0.0041591837,0.00004998027,0.00002779588,0.000013141996,0.000011001785,0.000005796223,0.0012428806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982863,0.0010281394,0.00007131586,0.00022967753,0.00014611839,0.00023844972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751881,0.020541627,0.001713132,0.0009102394,0.00040099586,0.0012460342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035557095,0.00045925291,0.0008263541,0.00043247335,0.00070794043,0.0022234535,0.0007665166,0.0024561335,0.0036994729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016571103,0.00034463924,0.00045669187,0.00039596908,0.0025831896,0.0030076297,0.001346842,0.0014253394,0.0002600768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012694983,0.0012129984,0.015353666,0.0002946619,0.00029563185,0.0014899594,0.0015871437,0.35929555,0.0034166733,0.54924953,0.0024528306,0.064081855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013506997,0.00028282427,0.003129494,0.000029309573,0.000055316792,0.00014443113,0.0005948565,0.30133274,0.0005716063,0.6927716,0.00090446556,0.000048272654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018027049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017224343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036994729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006734472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000928193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01880467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526936651","doi":"10.3386/w21400","title":"Do Risk Preferences Change? Evidence from Panel Data before and after the Great East Japan Earthquake","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Panel data; Geography; Economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.827360945244902,"score_gpt":0.5793973896884685,"score_spread":0.24796355555643346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526936651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948348,0.0003852058,0.00022848127,0.0005887116,0.000025219508,0.000008463234,0.0026333884,0.0000050393046,0.0012906595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99499905,0.00035329236,0.00010103488,0.00022132393,0.00002866348,0.000012415721,0.0037177913,0.00000360932,0.0005626946],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987167,0.0005409513,0.00012591796,0.00025432467,0.00012809009,0.00023392757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778162,0.008427702,0.009038078,0.002647704,0.00087647146,0.0011938203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027601086,0.0002583668,0.00063650444,0.00070857763,0.0005221245,0.0013612347,0.00062371365,0.0013123613,0.004479394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107948175,0.00038431058,0.00089862105,0.0021010381,0.00049567816,0.00089102477,0.00082254,0.0014446939,0.000984563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064653927,0.00021797292,0.98695403,0.000051573275,0.0007896817,0.00018557855,0.0006515809,0.0010401837,0.00022492815,0.0003602868,0.0021032325,0.0067745005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021568676,0.000047372345,0.9973143,0.000013302606,0.00014247591,0.000028331462,0.0005367099,0.00059596833,0.00007863017,0.0003234825,0.0008817106,0.000016248874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024035834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027822664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024035834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034058353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002835466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0477919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527239430","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2363870","title":"Uncertainty, Ambiguity and Risk Taking: An Experimental Investigation of Consumer Behavior and Demand for Insurance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Actuarial science; Consumer behaviour; Consumer demand; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Economics; Microeconomics; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.0696357363310113,"score_gpt":0.36868115798492423,"score_spread":0.2990454216539129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527239430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992034,0.000011016625,0.00014025919,0.000049250346,0.0000074857808,0.000056057113,0.000030676743,0.0000035321834,0.00049836125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969047,0.000061582425,0.0014111651,0.00011932761,0.00003057522,0.00024784275,0.00013086392,0.0000146460925,0.0010793117],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985825,0.000597269,0.00014040695,0.00027945288,0.0002809788,0.00011951807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95505553,0.03723255,0.0032524273,0.0031230494,0.00035825372,0.0009781902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033770602,0.00097101624,0.0008994499,0.00046666476,0.00093051995,0.002602699,0.0010412604,0.0021754496,0.008754181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023410823,0.0008988656,0.0006958008,0.00049010443,0.0018697726,0.0017069328,0.0010642684,0.0022394494,0.00049373606],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.19037442,0.33170015,0.14668947,0.0015779105,0.0016414436,0.0012717765,0.022639897,0.007550044,0.21725032,0.02245819,0.0020110838,0.054835357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06479791,0.28993282,0.37769333,0.0002827048,0.002844577,0.0018157404,0.014093219,0.11318945,0.071977064,0.054824475,0.0075227115,0.0010260557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013800663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012643165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008754181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065908773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007913766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02928567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527443085","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.43033-3","title":"Decision and Choice: Random Utility Models of Choice and Response Time","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Accumulator (cryptography); Representation (politics); Multiplicative function; Discrete choice; Context (archaeology); Mathematics; Expected utility hypothesis; Independence (probability theory); Econometrics; Computer science; Statistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.12917386761093932,"score_gpt":0.3718050079174472,"score_spread":0.24263114030650787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527443085","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011738352,0.013217257,0.8928229,0.009848889,0.0008712838,0.000085956715,0.0007517221,0.00050559157,0.070158005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54306763,0.028393788,0.22691244,0.0025645576,0.002289936,0.0008796059,0.0015376211,0.00055968924,0.19379467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981975,0.0011161112,0.000058269547,0.0002466948,0.00027571837,0.00010575167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944153,0.0047418955,0.00026658564,0.00023795066,0.00021574089,0.00012253884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030745587,0.0016890633,0.0016629052,0.00080907566,0.00042730218,0.0043777786,0.00229721,0.0039571906,0.02245721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012348987,0.0009029834,0.00123348,0.0018095451,0.0020690882,0.0053799627,0.0010049959,0.0036991634,0.004530225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041450287,0.00005410804,0.00035191,0.00015807326,0.0000507844,0.000075853786,0.00017923105,0.03788453,0.00020851052,0.90700656,0.012568452,0.041420624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017984381,0.000015668153,0.00016545606,0.00005615113,0.000022394799,0.00008205391,0.000032891676,0.11006751,0.00008119198,0.8802128,0.00922213,0.000023783141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003268687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019046838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02245721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001810237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012482116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07512689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534693585","doi":"10.1108/00251740710762026","title":"The positive side of negative framing","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Overconfidence effect; Framing (construction); Framing effect; Originality; Decision quality; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Knowledge management","score_opus":0.05900356430257299,"score_gpt":0.3929994382646191,"score_spread":0.3339958739620461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534693585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52126205,0.004222464,0.06957169,0.025414325,0.0014615158,0.0002679894,0.00011920078,0.00012905247,0.37755165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921085,0.00055148074,0.004737239,0.0010033115,0.00019265014,0.000051963103,0.00002070159,0.000017092068,0.0013170572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9644167,0.025799913,0.001002281,0.001469511,0.005817388,0.0014943266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8732632,0.09676063,0.01258353,0.0086255595,0.006337278,0.0024298066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026795682,0.0007564703,0.00058518536,0.001329876,0.0018123336,0.006647782,0.0009099321,0.0015744241,0.008744396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08968641,0.00039045195,0.0006218635,0.0006930521,0.008151024,0.0052145473,0.004135631,0.0031634248,0.00058632146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001190705,0.00048479313,0.05709423,0.001967219,0.0003916603,0.001285468,0.018932836,0.004561965,0.006240553,0.6451143,0.0060095745,0.25672668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027002912,0.0010368217,0.04083444,0.002790117,0.00068319746,0.0016986736,0.022700204,0.0113272015,0.01200095,0.8408897,0.06549738,0.00027129363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092776143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007688859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026795682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001610562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019750644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14171082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537799777","doi":"10.7202/1105357ar","title":"LA PERCEPTION DU RISQUE D’ÊTRE ARRÊTÉ CHEZ LES CAMIONNEURS ET TRANSPORTEURS ROUTIERS","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances :","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06677083715056875,"score_gpt":0.3590834296888816,"score_spread":0.2923125925383128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537799777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98826027,0.000422375,0.0020180992,0.0007799737,0.000027835786,0.00002913976,0.00022857398,0.000009410301,0.008224387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939173,0.00058938627,0.0011247159,0.00009983145,0.000015314043,0.00003862984,0.00013272939,0.0000079603915,0.004074168],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978098,0.0009022427,0.00012554188,0.00031410845,0.00062776863,0.000220493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871683,0.00459228,0.0032789996,0.00044949568,0.0036006481,0.00091027835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032700282,0.00035246316,0.00036615384,0.000911289,0.0011374371,0.0027904024,0.00046747547,0.0009235289,0.0062807263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013944809,0.00025867688,0.00043058893,0.0010651889,0.001281687,0.0015469145,0.0011230086,0.0010334245,0.00068630616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032941345,0.000066459535,0.84559655,0.00031308128,0.00018614417,0.00037494695,0.10643496,0.00094475935,0.0020034993,0.0036909254,0.0012849184,0.03877436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056907115,0.00021610138,0.8484383,0.00021656249,0.00005066323,0.00022499358,0.13918167,0.0010100018,0.00044848485,0.0009014234,0.009237845,0.000068331305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10050101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098253526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10050101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019068097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021219612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19983202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541720588","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.712062","title":"Testing Explanations of Preference Reversal: A Model","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Psychology; Econometrics; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.23211127011483162,"score_gpt":0.38856080744715793,"score_spread":0.1564495373323263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541720588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67133206,0.00043945224,0.26432323,0.014365772,0.0003067729,0.0003174641,0.0012593784,0.0005591326,0.047096767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767839,0.00017723165,0.017533172,0.00058438024,0.00011849137,0.00012982407,0.00033867362,0.000038429353,0.0042958343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706465,0.001782638,0.00011809669,0.0005107524,0.00024622105,0.00027757927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9518749,0.039698254,0.0023614855,0.003934873,0.0011499241,0.000980543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005774673,0.0010975316,0.0017184558,0.0012449903,0.0007634639,0.0029487256,0.003354432,0.004410821,0.021664673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041696094,0.0005869225,0.0021763647,0.0011897582,0.0021658877,0.0039181146,0.0013343876,0.0025543082,0.0016650344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029352834,0.0020485779,0.015388743,0.00044990942,0.00046816605,0.0013430148,0.0010033486,0.10326085,0.0015426858,0.79647577,0.009972071,0.06511154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070077984,0.00020387614,0.0012724372,0.00001812972,0.00009235701,0.00019441571,0.00014780567,0.45369935,0.00024558033,0.5426589,0.00072292984,0.0000434019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035467644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019685118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021664673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011664523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014832076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07247555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543954364","doi":"10.3386/w14020","title":"Measuring the Output and Prices of the Lottery Sector: An Application of Implicit Expected Utility Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Econometrics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.6097145243407278,"score_gpt":0.5383874558340881,"score_spread":0.07132706850663972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543954364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67103666,0.00019866215,0.3169574,0.00028102205,0.000020769075,0.00014455474,0.00084646436,0.00008806437,0.01042636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98033136,0.00006143907,0.018388208,0.000009807102,0.0000052567384,0.000042900996,0.0003323209,0.00001176877,0.0008170467],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985316,0.0007398921,0.000054469994,0.0001891157,0.00036138538,0.00012345631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993419,0.0043586213,0.00090663705,0.000528931,0.00062983553,0.00015701231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030174057,0.00053998147,0.00066063507,0.0010390942,0.00033427827,0.0019249665,0.0012988051,0.0005753145,0.0032604018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019650659,0.00025313464,0.0005393331,0.0019343431,0.0011435541,0.00257919,0.0012476536,0.0009679151,0.0002805042],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087007653,0.0006348435,0.1956143,0.0004687073,0.0004570997,0.00036817967,0.0015250614,0.414284,0.0040241987,0.27037355,0.0017535252,0.109626465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045237564,0.00025904237,0.07414116,0.000058033085,0.00006759768,0.00010694959,0.0007576836,0.7557712,0.0038835572,0.1625966,0.0021956868,0.00011724314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0146622015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012081254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0146622015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002254004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012546094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029153705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555008460","doi":"10.1007/s11238-017-9597-9","title":"Conditional expected utility","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Subjective expected utility; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Mathematical economics; Axiom; Preference; Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Decision theory; Separable space; Utility theory; Representation theorem; Preference theory; Conditional probability; Consistency (knowledge bases); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.15982006671841248,"score_gpt":0.45042826275737896,"score_spread":0.2906081960389665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555008460","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067682885,0.001544807,0.78791213,0.0052890168,0.00037981686,0.0001658714,0.0017752374,0.00045884334,0.13479145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91884506,0.0011731467,0.037015185,0.0005685605,0.00031636015,0.0001630296,0.00093369256,0.00008859008,0.04089637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982577,0.00073210755,0.00007259161,0.00031084317,0.0003884569,0.00023838467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937704,0.004330408,0.0002795944,0.0007413345,0.0006240514,0.00025419463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023986686,0.00080483063,0.0010115037,0.0012065896,0.00041004055,0.002559591,0.0012410176,0.0012428417,0.024085475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016818605,0.00033274066,0.0008420949,0.0011766814,0.0011788309,0.0042825113,0.0010204425,0.0022495943,0.0019576382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004404678,0.00006189889,0.0007496967,0.00006107008,0.00003812702,0.00006580462,0.000050935385,0.008101288,0.00021399163,0.96773696,0.0033489969,0.01952723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012203156,0.000029431336,0.00085999735,0.000035915604,0.000027116908,0.00013403548,0.000028734292,0.04878011,0.00034360826,0.9462883,0.0034460903,0.000014427966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093788997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066144613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024085475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013258612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00109563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08057392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560211103","doi":"10.1016/s0079-7421(02)80011-1","title":"Real-world estimation: Estimation modes and seeding effects","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"˜The œPsychology of learning and motivation/˜The œpsychology of learning and motivation","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Seeding; Estimation; Metric (unit); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Range (aeronautics); Inference; Algorithm; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Econometrics; Machine learning; Engineering","score_opus":0.08959038753598943,"score_gpt":0.38240254512252264,"score_spread":0.29281215758653323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560211103","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03675003,0.0009784668,0.9586788,0.000308943,0.00004549645,0.000024192865,0.000066360015,0.0006762101,0.0024714344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68599546,0.000999459,0.30758712,0.00015550316,0.0001239959,0.00011186231,0.00034759133,0.00080708414,0.0038718744],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99609095,0.0023862626,0.00018701708,0.0007253726,0.00049591396,0.00011450838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8691232,0.11259289,0.0025888802,0.012654702,0.002668608,0.00037173988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012474741,0.00087990426,0.00084429636,0.0013035181,0.0003565222,0.002886092,0.0016623472,0.0019409475,0.0048308265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1292224,0.0010518503,0.0006809047,0.0014970561,0.0017505052,0.00905963,0.0015089033,0.002095791,0.001038731],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067643303,0.00021269896,0.03539846,0.00042425317,0.00027710054,0.00043139205,0.0011853228,0.16515489,0.007890243,0.25713995,0.006805786,0.52440345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019413,0.000048699716,0.0069849463,0.00007510172,0.000049982704,0.00052490615,0.000096174896,0.7715883,0.0053213723,0.21317391,0.0020527323,0.00006443763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010073713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008008246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012474741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006819213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037268602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06597352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562845750","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00728","title":"Four converging measures of temporal discounting and their relationships with intelligence, executive functions, thinking dispositions, and behavioral outcomes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental Health; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporal discounting; Psychology; Discounting; Intertemporal choice; Cognition; Delay discounting; Set (abstract data type); Variance (accounting); Executive functions; Sample (material); Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Function (biology); Impulsivity; Developmental psychology; Econometrics; Neuroscience; Mathematics","score_opus":0.21716648586567816,"score_gpt":0.3985975209715493,"score_spread":0.18143103510587116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562845750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968713,0.00017143953,0.0015048329,0.000024647008,0.000006222695,0.000031738513,0.00023654665,0.00001383643,0.0011393542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957218,0.00017374026,0.0032762287,0.000015856953,0.00000982236,0.000053946784,0.0003878686,0.000006155592,0.0003544588],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993462,0.00015193628,0.0001222197,0.000109691915,0.00022522757,0.000044706987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856228,0.0032701027,0.008211635,0.000989099,0.0010071743,0.00089919084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019079527,0.00076839473,0.00036352337,0.002387073,0.00028985314,0.0010714618,0.0004656576,0.0004374895,0.0013379457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010161745,0.00025513166,0.0006465024,0.0015759126,0.00050371833,0.00066832005,0.00083909323,0.0013518662,0.00011695145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021787938,0.0001621027,0.9854558,0.000026976953,0.00021011966,0.000033298817,0.00017776762,0.00036798528,0.0010543885,0.00023826625,0.000052202162,0.012003235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007924521,0.00026179443,0.9966864,0.000011075294,0.00004803567,0.000178426,0.00011236972,0.0012703303,0.0007398141,0.0005388412,0.0001290135,0.000015945807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023144765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004606029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002387073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039165365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002732057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010090351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564198999","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.899006","title":"Updating Preferences with Multiple Priors","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Prior probability; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Bayesian probability; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04017279883567929,"score_gpt":0.32446387942160865,"score_spread":0.28429108058592933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564198999","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21455936,0.0004942287,0.771878,0.0029229112,0.00022844068,0.00008952172,0.00026738766,0.00039536445,0.009164813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9151707,0.00025617756,0.07878538,0.0003843184,0.00019396993,0.000088306195,0.00016667457,0.00008779062,0.0048665567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956573,0.0021893086,0.00020650415,0.0010968806,0.0005257721,0.0003241515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94347763,0.0459371,0.0022513275,0.006161291,0.0013715837,0.0008010462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071559045,0.0007806092,0.0012915935,0.0009652803,0.0005374833,0.0034893006,0.0016159082,0.0027472365,0.0076885247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07534532,0.0013835041,0.0012533106,0.0011360709,0.0014150633,0.009757597,0.0018425866,0.004270091,0.000851145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024002385,0.00081343483,0.013430429,0.00038255076,0.00069084886,0.00081009703,0.00105034,0.29997492,0.0061238953,0.36522216,0.006726936,0.30237415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009989169,0.00008026714,0.0015552357,0.000022873033,0.00008596284,0.00016405099,0.000053939144,0.6527821,0.0012432651,0.34300527,0.00085906667,0.000048077516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016688751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018057456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076885247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009723517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054364896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03784454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564922926","doi":"","title":"Hedonics in Consumer Behavior","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Outcome (game theory); Subjective well-being; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology; Marketing; Public economics; Business; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.06854347415585278,"score_gpt":0.40010851785424706,"score_spread":0.3315650436983943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564922926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4099252,0.039893452,0.028332574,0.02464976,0.0007244694,0.00016154602,0.0007524014,0.000076855606,0.49548373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98842233,0.0036234406,0.0019523198,0.0008898637,0.00014764573,0.000028236138,0.00006793643,0.0000070001342,0.00486111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941826,0.00029765547,0.000019644682,0.000070972834,0.00012897846,0.00006439038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990845,0.00044415158,0.00013759136,0.00006656987,0.000150132,0.00011708382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001063786,0.0003805072,0.0002778889,0.00072295906,0.0005489269,0.0028965236,0.000267617,0.00096537324,0.005130213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038368406,0.00014676902,0.00029013152,0.0010710229,0.0026237434,0.0017426619,0.00093650504,0.0013314931,0.00029627385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023423042,0.00021185286,0.03638116,0.00031156544,0.0001445964,0.00025183547,0.0064820573,0.0054171993,0.001177364,0.8159553,0.011389218,0.12204364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033063254,0.00021514967,0.19028682,0.00040971817,0.000060744063,0.00029796571,0.0058447896,0.0073737376,0.00028654892,0.7438631,0.05123309,0.00009538872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030333858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022524805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005130213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014962659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043973123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017162263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573767894","doi":"10.4000/books.pufc.13957","title":"La théorie de la décision et la psychologie du sens commun","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté eBooks","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Francophone University Association","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Epistemology; Folk psychology; Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Simple (philosophy); Philosophy; Decision theory; Psychology; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.08015620350634348,"score_gpt":0.36541425236656927,"score_spread":0.28525804886022577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573767894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053202085,0.007803863,0.36582857,0.033193883,0.00110782,0.000088039495,0.00022989167,0.00024786932,0.53829795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89066964,0.0055864872,0.04853526,0.0020047014,0.0007382984,0.00021886418,0.0001881949,0.000106377986,0.05195217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957075,0.0022927534,0.00013294436,0.0008305502,0.00076047383,0.0002757757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567246,0.0029157184,0.00043938076,0.0005564542,0.0002750083,0.00014096305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037391663,0.00075742754,0.00058675255,0.0017054693,0.0016772107,0.006793187,0.0013875822,0.002221362,0.017043486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006977147,0.00044801697,0.0014549294,0.0015350385,0.01785016,0.007845775,0.0028865067,0.0037447016,0.0019512065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067389938,0.0000051824613,0.0001380685,0.000028225895,0.0000077051545,0.000013451413,0.0003467126,0.0004914514,0.00005882064,0.99528533,0.0003842679,0.0032341313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014575631,0.000027390208,0.0007753032,0.00006506766,0.000013815442,0.0000835059,0.00053257565,0.0029771102,0.0002855421,0.9645586,0.030648094,0.000018426781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048451475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031363082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017043486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026412897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057016194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576290844","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1792","title":"Extreme Outcomes Sway Risky Decisions from Experience","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Gambling Research Institute, University of Calgary; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Risk-seeking; Actuarial science; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.25457423032658,"score_gpt":0.45132422197669936,"score_spread":0.19674999165011936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576290844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99356914,0.000097050935,0.0016624065,0.00010010961,0.000012417141,0.000011537372,0.000023321745,0.000011592818,0.0045124446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854916,0.000058881422,0.0009962432,0.00006190436,0.000005860956,0.000010709756,0.000026298363,0.0000066519947,0.00028421555],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987772,0.0006151694,0.00007184411,0.00022674153,0.00020883707,0.00010022263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920075,0.0045609865,0.0015841796,0.001001039,0.00018050872,0.00066578464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017122274,0.0003618861,0.00042462186,0.00029875463,0.00042257272,0.0015148715,0.00027687103,0.0008415964,0.0065651946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012850275,0.00038071678,0.00036394867,0.00016071,0.0012809174,0.0014089906,0.0018344326,0.0012954558,0.0003411514],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013776935,0.004876903,0.42846984,0.0021696943,0.0017420603,0.0020496761,0.015149644,0.03352722,0.25193378,0.05260701,0.0033967074,0.19030055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067840057,0.008952053,0.76752406,0.00039690145,0.0007558963,0.001202022,0.0065126303,0.03130662,0.030131422,0.14370051,0.008472187,0.00036735053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003764568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005986542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065651946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024922966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017465538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021962702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576518232","doi":"10.1515/auk-2007-0204","title":"Non-deteriorating Choice Without Full Transitivity","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analyse & Kritik","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Rationality; Rationalizability; Status quo; Mathematical economics; Rational choice theory (criminology); Ecological rationality; Social choice theory; Element (criminal law); Economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.11043492620018362,"score_gpt":0.43356819537507685,"score_spread":0.3231332691748932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576518232","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3414074,0.00092584133,0.531194,0.0024812836,0.00009598976,0.00032234596,0.00025475357,0.00027275243,0.12304567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658776,0.0001388539,0.031275,0.00014718997,0.000028571547,0.00007390181,0.00007356127,0.000021098018,0.002364292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98857456,0.0053607645,0.0007964164,0.0022080606,0.0021877405,0.0008724379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799028,0.010335577,0.0018595293,0.004435839,0.0027114332,0.0007547523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01051269,0.00051019684,0.001097227,0.0014636172,0.0009875284,0.00306572,0.0011619908,0.0011458342,0.003763797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016408188,0.0003757184,0.0012510968,0.0009690006,0.010779411,0.0052669547,0.0037483058,0.0028965164,0.0003861639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008650797,0.0000388371,0.00057274144,0.000067867346,0.000033601642,0.000094928,0.0003227578,0.0057102013,0.0011949746,0.98719215,0.0002468831,0.0044385083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020784786,0.000050037932,0.00035197104,0.000025729554,0.000014176901,0.00006322517,0.00012699942,0.011983216,0.000949359,0.984672,0.0017292212,0.000013244591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096114055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000841139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01051269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019743603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011179476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055597126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577708642","doi":"10.15353/rea.v4i1.1535","title":"Weak* Axiom of Independence and the Non-Expected Utility Theory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Analysis","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom independence; Expected utility hypothesis; Axiom; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Mathematical economics; Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory; Independence (probability theory); Subjective expected utility; Axiom of choice; Constructive set theory; Prospect theory; Urelement; Context (archaeology); Mathematics; Decision theory; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Function (biology); Economics; Set (abstract data type); Set theory; Computer science; Social choice theory; Statistics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.07526997619906828,"score_gpt":0.40044637413979967,"score_spread":0.3251763979407314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577708642","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030380573,0.012607597,0.76363426,0.015781613,0.0008539843,0.00010935268,0.0005609661,0.00011613852,0.17595546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7651279,0.013782772,0.1846406,0.005861593,0.0023154987,0.0006511256,0.000654231,0.000115574694,0.02685074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930616,0.0025600598,0.00047320835,0.00090763206,0.002573702,0.00042374013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893924,0.0072455583,0.00075439847,0.0010273099,0.0012645406,0.0003158208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006006644,0.00056398247,0.0012463958,0.0014453034,0.0014252817,0.003302281,0.002060598,0.002041654,0.0032394177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01072593,0.0006434767,0.0015903467,0.0016738821,0.009418322,0.0062356014,0.0026980387,0.005889759,0.0011787186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074406153,0.000008972185,0.00013537866,0.000044273806,0.000013290403,0.00004520821,0.000049275262,0.00060966896,0.0000915788,0.99316335,0.0006512621,0.0051802755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047139974,0.0000073380456,0.00015164258,0.000021200156,0.0000042499373,0.00006517391,0.000011116062,0.0014994696,0.000087550914,0.9920536,0.006086805,0.0000071929526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011881997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007373738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006006644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019298457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002022344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031766534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580902776","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0161477","title":"Myopic Loss Aversion under Ambiguity and Gender Effects","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Generalitat Valenciana; York University","keywords":"Ambiguity; Loss aversion; Ambiguity aversion; Risk aversion (psychology); Psychology; Econometrics; Social psychology; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.27385934381546245,"score_gpt":0.3583481884171427,"score_spread":0.08448884460168027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580902776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98845285,0.00017980754,0.0049212305,0.00024291074,0.000010339604,0.000008075324,0.000045273697,0.000015310994,0.006124077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993291,0.000041261534,0.0002315621,0.000027064387,0.000009124588,0.0000025843974,0.000009507191,0.0000014116578,0.00034832652],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993243,0.0002445207,0.000028241906,0.00010972059,0.00014037345,0.00015283309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99352276,0.0036295876,0.001496876,0.00069237815,0.00018254168,0.00047584888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023839807,0.0003312,0.0005950287,0.00046353697,0.00022771847,0.001008935,0.0002660973,0.00053065846,0.0038879411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009423238,0.00024703235,0.00033323714,0.00024832832,0.0009957113,0.00076636503,0.00084747735,0.00076628436,0.00017291284],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0077190795,0.0015976231,0.43689528,0.0005726956,0.0005903617,0.0039601936,0.0026477233,0.052998744,0.08608111,0.288595,0.0026259187,0.11571627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030853788,0.001045998,0.46882203,0.000060690956,0.0002783285,0.0014969088,0.0010811323,0.07911743,0.0050405012,0.44117,0.0014743151,0.0001040897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007696691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005729956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038879411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003771231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003297092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013006508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582972446","doi":"10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00343.x","title":"Hindsight Bias, Visual Aids, and Legal Decision Making: Timing is Everything","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Hindsight bias; Processing fluency; Psychology; CLARITY; Cognitive psychology; Context (archaeology); Overconfidence effect; Debiasing; Cognitive bias; Social psychology; Fluency; Cognition","score_opus":0.4071035614528277,"score_gpt":0.4846050736421363,"score_spread":0.07750151218930856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582972446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96034503,0.0012005582,0.0146087445,0.001634059,0.000069898095,0.00002637631,0.00004292475,0.000049137398,0.022023236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970772,0.0001638807,0.002212115,0.00010454042,0.00002514832,0.000003864841,0.0000102379245,0.000005573715,0.00039740605],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977864,0.0013872522,0.000114617775,0.00018453713,0.00042903915,0.00009805854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93181586,0.051310886,0.010761182,0.0025964503,0.0021399744,0.001375668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049203923,0.0003013438,0.00023335914,0.0005391147,0.0002976328,0.0023471029,0.0004029636,0.0008149442,0.007702496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06608448,0.0001450588,0.00018013101,0.0002919749,0.0013954086,0.0015531095,0.0008589555,0.00079843274,0.0003006413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008869965,0.0015385307,0.32982862,0.0008766743,0.00040053145,0.0012026359,0.0047072503,0.027146503,0.082275964,0.082945615,0.003724798,0.4564829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051114184,0.003399394,0.5668438,0.0007347387,0.00038920811,0.0029451079,0.0037045644,0.090249866,0.033464104,0.28415307,0.013337041,0.0002679459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087479694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071969413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007702496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047751438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037019775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026021838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588403970","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1874","title":"A Goal‐Priming Approach to Cognitive Consistency: Applications to Judgment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Priming (agriculture); Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Preference; Wishful thinking; Task (project management); Process (computing); Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.30705424950436955,"score_gpt":0.4760887536961202,"score_spread":0.16903450419175065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588403970","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045641612,0.00044036383,0.93870544,0.00082184374,0.00011321716,0.00036667864,0.0000666348,0.00044246655,0.013401871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49927363,0.00022327328,0.4974801,0.00035331122,0.00015469879,0.0011699933,0.000034855973,0.00018451597,0.0011255923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921726,0.0058443015,0.0002219077,0.00084931677,0.00078825117,0.00012371442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92054296,0.06755133,0.0031748007,0.005377545,0.0024301817,0.0009231768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0145775415,0.00086908625,0.00086611876,0.0019675808,0.0008623037,0.0020434472,0.0013946275,0.0014278807,0.0065775095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06860009,0.000895736,0.0011287443,0.0018170719,0.0041039614,0.0031751993,0.0027746006,0.0027607097,0.00053502346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092963874,0.0009806941,0.008568928,0.0006691044,0.00020556935,0.0004110013,0.003907246,0.014833721,0.025198812,0.7146221,0.0019699465,0.22770311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024092116,0.00032212352,0.005628539,0.00007055663,0.0000743476,0.00025862624,0.00017371726,0.11046165,0.0070372135,0.87197727,0.0036744077,0.00008064201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081366353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003937146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0145775415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012125948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095492136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07709432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590853164","doi":"10.7202/1091847ar","title":"Insurance demand under ambiguityand conflict for extreme risks: Evidencefrom a large representative survey","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"AXA Research Fund","keywords":"Ambiguity; Actuarial science; Business; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.5916606046342158,"score_gpt":0.5082275678968755,"score_spread":0.08343303673734026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590853164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958204,0.0009011672,0.0006451681,0.00044015088,0.000013667224,0.0000294358,0.001245234,0.0000034561826,0.00090138294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963043,0.00077396544,0.00028964932,0.00027056172,0.000046146524,0.000057866695,0.001879972,0.000002477738,0.00037494206],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99379987,0.003810808,0.00048128332,0.0006252336,0.00094926433,0.0003335945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9380993,0.036815602,0.0172124,0.0041012373,0.0026247816,0.0011465914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006767821,0.00033062458,0.00071765116,0.0008217151,0.00040609142,0.001258462,0.0006999659,0.001549945,0.0040055006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037928306,0.00048007688,0.00081519154,0.0018913165,0.0007453507,0.0016491895,0.0012490911,0.0011349061,0.0006957895],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005421203,0.00050854153,0.98054767,0.00014594935,0.0005962521,0.00012531875,0.0011833984,0.00035592195,0.00018624547,0.00039217036,0.002113867,0.013302509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043920612,0.0003566543,0.9940498,0.00006406912,0.00014479441,0.0001953531,0.0017590233,0.0009666877,0.00016536152,0.0005998935,0.0016262783,0.000028151282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006636318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057882923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006767821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039895193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003914239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035792112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591308282","doi":"10.4000/cpl.4948","title":"Reasoning from or reasoning about beliefs: Truth-based or possibility-based compatibility judgments and Handley et al.’s (2006) litmus test of the suppositional conditional","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current psychology letters","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Compatibility (geochemistry); Litmus; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10271541425082097,"score_gpt":0.4385167133523023,"score_spread":0.3358012991014813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591308282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9184135,0.00059857155,0.033233874,0.0031359573,0.00013578746,0.0001823533,0.0002615902,0.000096431446,0.043941908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904082,0.00009125423,0.0080847,0.0003986821,0.00007664455,0.00008791297,0.00024578633,0.000019660722,0.0005870825],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99017733,0.0037707246,0.00085135235,0.0013786445,0.0034750171,0.0003467945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9264302,0.055266835,0.009121259,0.004400425,0.003366182,0.0014150338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012100231,0.0005408123,0.00055970775,0.0021340887,0.0009091487,0.0030756958,0.0011523778,0.0025722242,0.008815104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13622695,0.00047020614,0.0015762436,0.0011111981,0.003990104,0.01315317,0.0033942712,0.0029106112,0.0007232781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013608969,0.0028024917,0.28760397,0.0012688905,0.0014296498,0.0015687979,0.042895604,0.008039598,0.03606753,0.29594383,0.006892362,0.30187827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076291244,0.0016424622,0.30206296,0.0002656757,0.00032437386,0.0015692601,0.00597887,0.030903732,0.008777322,0.6403861,0.0070377593,0.00028856297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010115206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072804384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012100231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000822946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006151751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06399292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592323927","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1805564","title":"Priors and Desires","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Prior probability; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Bayesian probability","score_opus":0.15808632024470376,"score_gpt":0.36253297975958676,"score_spread":0.204446659514883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592323927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20129398,0.001320503,0.34941503,0.014235445,0.000251866,0.0001474628,0.00104152,0.00022736409,0.4320668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9413665,0.00059137726,0.021974823,0.00057272793,0.00013871594,0.0001100915,0.000361003,0.00007700299,0.034807775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981231,0.0009806398,0.000094158706,0.0003383356,0.00029104695,0.00017272483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887579,0.008004902,0.0007493336,0.0011412986,0.0007479153,0.0005987652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032985716,0.0005129031,0.0004224799,0.00088425487,0.0008833661,0.0046488154,0.0005753518,0.001574391,0.021134492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032704715,0.0006611251,0.0006600762,0.0005937622,0.0020744908,0.0063807555,0.001437702,0.0032427267,0.0020743052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008085475,0.00004782018,0.001974685,0.000037115813,0.000022448163,0.00009888625,0.000818522,0.0017492488,0.00039833452,0.9754165,0.0015265428,0.017829197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014497944,0.000021041884,0.0011379475,0.000021827243,0.000017813909,0.00011483719,0.0002667428,0.0055385455,0.0002817132,0.9895075,0.00306506,0.000012468972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008009666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062166824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021134492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000692479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048450512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07070196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596875802","doi":"10.1023/a:1026249026940","title":"Newcomb's Hidden Regress","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Overdetermined system; Underdetermined system; Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Mathematics; Algorithm; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.10397390808836886,"score_gpt":0.40386303184065714,"score_spread":0.29988912375228827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596875802","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019877227,0.0025460313,0.94098306,0.0037424252,0.000559638,0.0000464191,0.00033059702,0.00025221566,0.03166243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6673282,0.006546393,0.22318907,0.0009120532,0.0008679437,0.00016366676,0.0004019022,0.00019642858,0.10039445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890757,0.00039110857,0.000061251885,0.00024026958,0.00030072106,0.00009918439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99227846,0.0059511266,0.0002826832,0.0008989764,0.0004478853,0.00014084502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028634025,0.0007068911,0.0014835148,0.0013803882,0.00071829703,0.0028098084,0.0014638827,0.0014639294,0.010254722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013793184,0.0006267067,0.0011923658,0.0016214226,0.0020983685,0.005243734,0.0018911419,0.0029951278,0.0016127609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032362874,0.000024683806,0.0004814442,0.000062043655,0.00004420832,0.000056383,0.000072482384,0.01046983,0.00013514282,0.95768785,0.0025265021,0.028407102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015163216,0.000008448121,0.0002468227,0.000024554562,0.000026963127,0.00004629888,0.000014635724,0.07385321,0.0003752143,0.9188984,0.006476661,0.000013564262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030505615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025246462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010254722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011836156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012393697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034305453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598606007","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00916","title":"Prior task experience affects temporal prediction and estimation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Estimation; Machine learning; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology","score_opus":0.10917942323400276,"score_gpt":0.4265777763646589,"score_spread":0.3173983531306561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598606007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99172485,0.00024822183,0.0051594214,0.000054587344,0.000017688028,0.000015034358,0.000048377253,0.000017491762,0.0027142668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749184,0.000119660755,0.001527743,0.000018654186,0.000011601153,0.000011056161,0.00010303417,0.000011406675,0.00070499233],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930966,0.00023490103,0.000047584606,0.00021147796,0.00010968204,0.00008671063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825331,0.012647004,0.0022204218,0.0009212714,0.0006335076,0.0010447708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022046072,0.00035549485,0.0003187833,0.00030729332,0.0001983031,0.0012220675,0.00029499707,0.0006311036,0.0038763776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02316123,0.00026138712,0.00026532944,0.00020091412,0.00028380245,0.00077943184,0.00067870156,0.00054143794,0.0004079924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0064447895,0.0019318066,0.740103,0.00039450792,0.0004841072,0.0005229632,0.002746317,0.036630824,0.052430157,0.00207759,0.0011433454,0.1550906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007308239,0.001490526,0.9373672,0.000085782194,0.0001536318,0.0002622633,0.0004946979,0.051541477,0.0044700177,0.0030206665,0.0009402781,0.0001003146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031919354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038914222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038763776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023126663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028567258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012967825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599627703","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500002825","title":"Cognition in the woods: Biases in probability judgments by search and rescue planners","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Psychology; Unpacking; Social psychology; Wilderness; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.2396090586714311,"score_gpt":0.4301681761063678,"score_spread":0.19055911743493673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599627703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99831223,0.000034843066,0.00050737144,0.000062930216,0.000002876876,0.00000467086,0.0000059298745,0.000004369251,0.0010647605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996117,0.00002779678,0.00022082252,0.00002415968,0.0000036870695,0.0000021281605,0.000006850395,0.0000010525216,0.00010175234],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889696,0.0005665356,0.000044424884,0.00013218778,0.00026674208,0.00009310457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99200624,0.004681427,0.0016846186,0.00076403725,0.0003996942,0.00046404242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023414933,0.00026113156,0.00023844597,0.00069381663,0.00041660073,0.001535961,0.00021303578,0.0005591356,0.0029643872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021242213,0.0002950204,0.00024785526,0.00030115133,0.0014354693,0.0011727771,0.0006934653,0.0006021581,0.00023880227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018460855,0.0007539046,0.8301755,0.00017992582,0.00022452389,0.0007583921,0.050038204,0.005508479,0.017889764,0.0038640571,0.0014280872,0.08733311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010149972,0.0012058708,0.94758326,0.00007524914,0.00007237398,0.0006032388,0.025805956,0.010063376,0.00226498,0.010388467,0.0017492363,0.00008653189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029016577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028980002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029643872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030485936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002804534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012383163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600338540","doi":"","title":"The Effect of an Additional Alternative on Measured Risk Preferences in a Field Experiment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Econometrics; Economics; Actuarial science; Geography","score_opus":0.1273206389860561,"score_gpt":0.4487921919657543,"score_spread":0.3214715529796982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600338540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99784815,0.00004460048,0.0010654863,0.00006180058,0.000009895979,0.000045363362,0.00003975002,0.000015019489,0.0008700082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99334794,0.000071002665,0.005327768,0.00010352485,0.000019989344,0.00015819247,0.00008234969,0.0000131880315,0.0008760588],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959194,0.0023981612,0.00024674096,0.00057695614,0.00066254794,0.00019619033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95564175,0.036741372,0.0032375,0.0026151864,0.00064169726,0.0011224705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031808473,0.0011602328,0.0010551835,0.00045455483,0.0005351969,0.0015632102,0.0008360807,0.0020126805,0.0061699795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019508623,0.0005960762,0.00057139224,0.000369341,0.00092061836,0.0013932077,0.0013217183,0.0019979721,0.00037979675],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.082690254,0.04318934,0.11770124,0.001799491,0.0011262087,0.0014445093,0.0043033916,0.019334916,0.6363605,0.004944869,0.0009925525,0.086112745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007930115,0.18460703,0.4646885,0.0004211345,0.0020115722,0.0024332183,0.0032741656,0.1271846,0.16423102,0.032321367,0.0098779965,0.00101928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005776205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008425616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061699795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004227883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030702862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020640612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608426784","doi":"","title":"Social Aggregation Without the Expected Utility Hypothesis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Subjective expected utility; Impossibility; Mathematical economics; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Utility theory; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Social preferences; Social choice theory; Value (mathematics); Pareto principle; Expected value; Bernoulli's principle; Economics; Prospect theory; Observer (physics); Econometrics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Statistics","score_opus":0.10159677749987656,"score_gpt":0.3345527780842371,"score_spread":0.23295600058436056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608426784","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21143454,0.0007000272,0.71777433,0.006339666,0.0001331316,0.00010960229,0.00025136207,0.00013643569,0.06312085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97172767,0.00033271778,0.022850892,0.00028930083,0.00011541651,0.000107094806,0.00008860514,0.000017066475,0.0044712108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944482,0.0027475453,0.00022129972,0.0007176559,0.0011270544,0.0007382664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906516,0.005339492,0.0012299069,0.0017842129,0.00064260827,0.0003522309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067424695,0.00066753174,0.0012914379,0.0008569755,0.001333544,0.0033819296,0.0012403139,0.002019357,0.0036685297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016378324,0.0004974548,0.0014898003,0.00070145377,0.0034810598,0.00810656,0.0030193473,0.002164846,0.00052417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001976461,0.000021865142,0.0006432854,0.000035637724,0.00003945877,0.000113998314,0.00013005316,0.010833517,0.000206429,0.9831902,0.0004222955,0.0043433965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001495636,0.000020432764,0.00034053926,0.000013513852,0.000011505679,0.000059775022,0.000060171205,0.029609095,0.00012714237,0.9685666,0.0011666373,0.0000095816495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011264537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009058487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067424695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015985059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011619859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035658002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W161674510","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511816789.025","title":"Motivation, decision making, and consciousness: from psychodynamics to subliminal priming and emotional constraint satisfaction","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subliminal stimuli; Psychodynamics; Psychology; Consciousness; Priming (agriculture); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.0987491629230933,"score_gpt":0.3198567486593416,"score_spread":0.2211075857362483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W161674510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2759255,0.09469602,0.1878521,0.019691836,0.00085724687,0.00016051375,0.0003380191,0.0004441353,0.42003465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9450181,0.0132464785,0.020842046,0.0008698672,0.00035057054,0.00017933255,0.0000804829,0.00013886375,0.019274244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997745,0.00007952634,0.000008581951,0.000051760777,0.00006264123,0.000022896707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988312,0.0009804933,0.000052102114,0.000059759073,0.000038155235,0.0000382248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075292867,0.00033192956,0.00047254105,0.00028916693,0.00032185082,0.003259551,0.0006816617,0.0011282123,0.0069227275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031305961,0.00037621803,0.00024806403,0.00046689948,0.0024383976,0.003438834,0.0006710044,0.0020241211,0.0004766115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002061737,0.00014218086,0.0015114107,0.00040790602,0.000047663103,0.00013670647,0.0031453345,0.0015274646,0.01704558,0.8065107,0.006336284,0.1629826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030892603,0.000084409105,0.005743025,0.00011508938,0.000019697096,0.00013929588,0.00046737102,0.0026242365,0.0025666042,0.9713651,0.016813366,0.000030881525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005967333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006492711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069227275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007003466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005445308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023158789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1623916541","doi":"10.5860/llm.v28i2.7055","title":"Risk-taking in Academic Libraries: The Implications of Prospect Theory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Leadership & Management","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Pace; Prospect theory; Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Dynamics (music); Value (mathematics); Academic community; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Management science; Business; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Engineering; Psychology; Social science; Finance","score_opus":0.2280112674352634,"score_gpt":0.3726053140095901,"score_spread":0.14459404657432673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1623916541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29793736,0.010407342,0.18377103,0.12872317,0.00057735166,0.0003481529,0.00018073058,0.00009253379,0.37796226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98642355,0.0027644897,0.0058378973,0.0010629204,0.00031963957,0.000084060994,0.000016548944,0.000010458352,0.0034805036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928645,0.005272193,0.00015890594,0.0003227442,0.0008661432,0.0005154418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95534396,0.036950484,0.0030299427,0.0008054977,0.0014485131,0.0024216159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009770322,0.00050120533,0.0008219539,0.0019984087,0.0027317696,0.010747247,0.0012578417,0.004036787,0.005052982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03427931,0.0004339592,0.00082120317,0.0021757206,0.01047635,0.010855527,0.004386572,0.004946317,0.00049898704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007662041,0.00018732293,0.003780393,0.00009524513,0.000023632789,0.00031307564,0.002775283,0.015377857,0.00007444827,0.9639324,0.0014896728,0.011874029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024203238,0.00004376647,0.0013455623,0.0000918058,0.000009172096,0.0001080313,0.002315986,0.01641789,0.00004460399,0.9765412,0.0030191233,0.000038668295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002861757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022024265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010747247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00392746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034669442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051671028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1655156919","doi":"10.3917/ecop.182.0001","title":"L'économie expérimentale comme outil d'aide à la décision","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Économie & prévision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2638391690564877,"score_gpt":0.38966216462164754,"score_spread":0.12582299556515986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1655156919","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13158944,0.03428074,0.59315586,0.05257514,0.009612447,0.0038731012,0.0019913623,0.0007844219,0.17213741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.667715,0.019891556,0.26769498,0.008287758,0.0034911917,0.010748547,0.00049551576,0.00020874041,0.021466712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96443284,0.028283726,0.0012154811,0.0022379942,0.0033856176,0.00044440757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75711083,0.21052934,0.0057556406,0.020680124,0.0045933262,0.0013307648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038752034,0.0012992412,0.0013528868,0.0013817094,0.0014784005,0.004561097,0.002929097,0.0030538945,0.021392241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09820805,0.0009852584,0.0014526423,0.0015348683,0.00903256,0.0067737564,0.0045481124,0.0040937406,0.0013421848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034082439,0.0038508368,0.004340301,0.003978945,0.0004950329,0.00013584612,0.0015726306,0.0046059545,0.0044327187,0.82254946,0.0074292435,0.14320074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003809617,0.0074469233,0.008637029,0.0028378814,0.0010691994,0.00040705997,0.0011832477,0.011883126,0.016634723,0.7445174,0.20116897,0.00040474895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017619762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012671713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038752034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027754374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031025845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20494282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1656179029","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2012.01.003","title":"Ramsey meets Laibson and Itô: Effects of hyperbolic discounting on stochastic growth","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic Asymmetries","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Economics; Hyperbolic discounting; Logarithm; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Growth model; Consumption (sociology); Mathematics","score_opus":0.058123423392874046,"score_gpt":0.35527617611946016,"score_spread":0.29715275272658614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1656179029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.862289,0.0021116894,0.09627928,0.011293427,0.00032293136,0.000043385244,0.00021372485,0.00015046229,0.027296022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923689,0.00075641804,0.0037143643,0.00018428161,0.00008083928,0.000012114604,0.00002368457,0.000036853406,0.0028226057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990252,0.0005738603,0.00005381488,0.00009567482,0.00011570826,0.00013560345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95219105,0.040285323,0.0027105277,0.0022425205,0.001439341,0.0011313075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006622463,0.00057818845,0.0010293052,0.00062798295,0.00073515694,0.0031783127,0.0008726116,0.0017389628,0.006049124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06177064,0.0006151789,0.0009624899,0.0005794996,0.0019744346,0.0068938187,0.0017034075,0.0028772957,0.0003245039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004935517,0.00007736795,0.0036578444,0.00008235272,0.000051404255,0.00023991197,0.0006792289,0.055522475,0.001342694,0.9233613,0.0019641877,0.012527633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008543948,0.00004481448,0.0018296471,0.000031227628,0.00007660264,0.00006620422,0.00030098308,0.18500145,0.00062109035,0.81083107,0.0010523001,0.00005903428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005905468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028087478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006622463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012938307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010875376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03502333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1656873868","doi":"10.1037/e667842007-001","title":"Could Behavioral Economics Help Improve Diet Quality for Nutrition Assistance Program Participants?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"PsycEXTRA Dataset","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Food and Nutrition Service; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; University of Alberta; Economic Research Service; Washington State University; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Behavioral economics; Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; Behavioural economics; Psychology; Gerontology; Public economics; Medicine; Economics; Food insecurity; Microeconomics; Biology; Food security; Ecology","score_opus":0.3674282890381557,"score_gpt":0.5439569691639515,"score_spread":0.1765286801257958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1656873868","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038991706,0.000272016,0.00027041134,0.0012216341,0.00007326555,0.00007232902,0.99306196,0.00011327556,0.0010160105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012794137,0.00029320133,0.0015742505,0.0005161138,0.000046795452,0.0007234432,0.98213917,0.00003031594,0.0018825461],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989287,0.0004319713,0.0001420277,0.00020399567,0.00016143652,0.00013170537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961604,0.0016396464,0.0007630217,0.0005398865,0.00065883057,0.00023819257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003322139,0.0009281186,0.001004334,0.0018675198,0.0004836902,0.0012804039,0.0023119245,0.0014851509,0.021217527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015241234,0.00034291385,0.0015793692,0.003159608,0.0002157362,0.0007559399,0.00092126813,0.0020034676,0.009054798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067481905,0.00028945447,0.038032543,0.0013814871,0.0002929654,0.000040019626,0.000046175337,0.0012969617,0.00007599896,0.0013399412,0.9409176,0.015611959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060007507,0.00022940562,0.2103883,0.0016568288,0.00078948407,0.0001548581,0.0005099551,0.011832966,0.0010307075,0.009403369,0.75787306,0.00013041105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040071048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07740177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040071048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002190121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020942977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079675615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1694187867","doi":"","title":"Dealing with Entrepreneurial Uncerstainity: Do Current Measures of Overconfidence Tell the Whole Story?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ASAC","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Overconfidence effect; Cognitive bias; Psychology; Entrepreneurship; Strengths and weaknesses; Cognition; Calibration; Social psychology; Econometrics; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.18752720604733228,"score_gpt":0.40334083806233884,"score_spread":0.21581363201500656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1694187867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8151211,0.01750118,0.09162804,0.03478335,0.00043121664,0.00014308875,0.00035896376,0.00002921989,0.040003784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893973,0.0033434504,0.005694641,0.00095606875,0.00013226017,0.000059772705,0.00005036814,0.000006154374,0.00036006136],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871464,0.007620193,0.00076954544,0.00065051194,0.0033796397,0.00043377638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8341604,0.118230596,0.031369526,0.0049479706,0.009634081,0.0016573735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028449612,0.0002504808,0.0006703362,0.0029673201,0.00081440044,0.0042681596,0.0009907278,0.0011931838,0.001300545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18608333,0.0002727687,0.00041013904,0.0030273702,0.004574483,0.01097702,0.0024155017,0.0019831548,0.00013266822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005054333,0.00025240498,0.41643634,0.0013261525,0.00045037997,0.00045738736,0.051900104,0.0024949685,0.0010463044,0.17858307,0.0031262417,0.34342125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004106445,0.00044343522,0.35882452,0.0028556061,0.00028586702,0.0011677241,0.06823112,0.00833892,0.0028743907,0.53515726,0.021533798,0.0002462761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013423541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018602232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028449612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016142604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014523724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15045774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1734675635","doi":"","title":"Thoughts on quantifying overconfidence in economic experiments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Overconfidence effect; Test (biology); Sample (material); Measure (data warehouse); Actuarial science; Psychology; Econometrics; Computer science; Economics; Social psychology; Data mining","score_opus":0.1581254074852033,"score_gpt":0.35715686949781217,"score_spread":0.19903146201260888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1734675635","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06013969,0.026851268,0.6210281,0.21268326,0.0081823785,0.0015436099,0.00066528574,0.00058138097,0.06832503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5565183,0.00858747,0.37210137,0.041799225,0.008474996,0.003893803,0.0001836968,0.00022632166,0.00821478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9234796,0.0628795,0.0024869766,0.0024305165,0.0081949355,0.00052849815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6426431,0.32062083,0.008153154,0.016751189,0.010519286,0.0013125384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10313006,0.0011112696,0.0013035436,0.0026430225,0.0012579233,0.0057533197,0.0031587759,0.0050988,0.0035291072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33189455,0.0006069269,0.0017176191,0.0017654393,0.022136543,0.014464158,0.0029568174,0.009791769,0.000513541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021465385,0.00013956301,0.0041772043,0.00074115384,0.00016763988,0.00024852902,0.0036578237,0.0044949846,0.0010356058,0.92916197,0.010614528,0.04534633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070327274,0.0002732818,0.0022668445,0.00064444024,0.00003052229,0.00016257401,0.0010964875,0.0040716436,0.0011016795,0.9716529,0.018535037,0.000094239054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010902772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057175773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10313006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024498852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009536067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5454104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1751271164","doi":"10.1177/076737011202700105","title":"Les routes multiples d'auto-expression <i>versus</i> d'inter-expression dans le choix du consommateur","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.21211662293894892,"score_gpt":0.42002670305211337,"score_spread":0.20791008011316445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1751271164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70630944,0.0032145516,0.14541642,0.0015043853,0.0002979305,0.00016854807,0.0004194291,0.00041237258,0.142257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9391139,0.0008665249,0.03215452,0.00013511402,0.000026453954,0.00012891342,0.00014900578,0.00019051116,0.027235126],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986721,0.00046270387,0.000056125227,0.00036700882,0.0003015018,0.00014058866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996897,0.0013982052,0.0004686063,0.00034793923,0.00065209996,0.00023619813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001277079,0.00063878705,0.0004051655,0.00046804492,0.00087977346,0.0043335548,0.00074607274,0.0011250039,0.024151266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044326517,0.0005148717,0.0008001881,0.000495883,0.0011436549,0.0036146888,0.0010459985,0.0015372992,0.0024886772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029646438,0.0005358101,0.028254291,0.00218442,0.0003203611,0.0009260444,0.01913273,0.011813413,0.234727,0.29250157,0.0034180784,0.40322158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046370178,0.004295458,0.23279467,0.0013209748,0.0009353202,0.0028311536,0.043274615,0.060588706,0.23822026,0.18885075,0.2255145,0.0009099301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040098857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058145905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024151266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013800188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013510674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08079404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1776244204","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1795","title":"Altering the Shape of Punishment Distributions Affects Decision Making in a Modified Iowa Gambling Task","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; McMaster University; Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Skew; Iowa gambling task; Variance (accounting); Psychology; Preference; Task (project management); Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Analysis of variance; Perception; Econometrics; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Cognition; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Communication; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.13856622509164848,"score_gpt":0.4314551819299026,"score_spread":0.2928889568382541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1776244204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99899274,0.000011828494,0.0006505645,0.000016870896,0.000006884357,0.000012296205,0.00005002836,0.000014508753,0.00024427247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997413,0.000028132003,0.0017329056,0.00005233912,0.0000022510915,0.000050636256,0.000103497834,0.000020576064,0.0005966884],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.999539,0.00016673007,0.000047609872,0.00009663548,0.00010577077,0.000044216416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978617,0.0009005759,0.00054057076,0.0002827561,0.00009872778,0.00031572796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007149002,0.00042176724,0.00035717044,0.00023752655,0.000109910834,0.00057590374,0.00023415837,0.00037289283,0.0015866281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039669396,0.00024461336,0.00015678041,0.00014358028,0.00035795788,0.00020453948,0.00039498904,0.0007435073,0.00016174556],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013528585,0.004508221,0.057370987,0.00011849245,0.00025524508,0.0001409893,0.00040902453,0.00440391,0.896087,0.00045565885,0.0006741983,0.02204775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008668034,0.01213034,0.8196817,0.00007287256,0.00023073274,0.00035378296,0.00036404957,0.049674578,0.11271164,0.0022641341,0.0014934993,0.00015586094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009566029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013744542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0015866281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021103573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018434548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005307734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1786148330","doi":"","title":"Group and individual risk preferences: a lottery-choice experiment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Preference; Risk aversion (psychology); Voting; Order (exchange); Psychology; Social psychology; Actuarial science; Group decision-making; Group (periodic table); Economics; Microeconomics; Expected utility hypothesis; Financial economics; Political science","score_opus":0.19000050829632203,"score_gpt":0.4283557189651707,"score_spread":0.23835521066884868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1786148330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933407,0.00003117926,0.0034493837,0.00020024297,0.00006765504,0.0004640469,0.00014037205,0.000030925206,0.0022756262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97863674,0.00009496231,0.014664885,0.0005735878,0.00008381842,0.0017258007,0.00030015328,0.000030077032,0.003889986],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634016,0.002445815,0.00017001931,0.00034935118,0.0005006299,0.0001941437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825063,0.012562424,0.0012933824,0.0021256313,0.00026003833,0.0012522616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077925795,0.0007206807,0.001293925,0.0004815579,0.0007195718,0.0018100861,0.00084944925,0.0017214098,0.006720837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013874286,0.00040077322,0.0005826509,0.0004479119,0.0015087597,0.001226476,0.00091339403,0.0019104123,0.0007320191],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.18386167,0.26796162,0.07421821,0.001460425,0.0017538173,0.0011298558,0.01342709,0.02525721,0.20682335,0.08240818,0.009448838,0.13224968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.072851025,0.22927955,0.159845,0.00029335613,0.0010887358,0.0015012809,0.0041287295,0.18693388,0.066553906,0.24978474,0.026673727,0.0010660549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002462136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020668146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077925795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032091726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005748075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041211605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1806059501","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1863","title":"When Does Framing Influence Preferences, Risk Perceptions, and Risk Attitudes? The Explicated Valence Account","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"York University; Government of Canada; Defence Research and Development Canada","keywords":"Framing effect; Framing (construction); Prospect theory; Risk perception; Perception; Risk-seeking; Psychology; Valence (chemistry); Social psychology; Economics; Loss aversion; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Engineering; Chemistry","score_opus":0.1262111218641538,"score_gpt":0.4200131924037594,"score_spread":0.2938020705396056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1806059501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93533695,0.0007487716,0.02366378,0.0021795703,0.0001651929,0.00005556049,0.00010020048,0.00003324008,0.03771667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974172,0.00013124786,0.0019903656,0.00011522516,0.000031882584,0.00001487953,0.000028206752,0.000008148583,0.00026280017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971411,0.0018989552,0.00010052242,0.00021420766,0.00047917114,0.0001659924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795442,0.014057292,0.002867675,0.0018010653,0.0012238102,0.0005060607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044865333,0.0004940477,0.0004136671,0.00077789987,0.00037998505,0.0033195098,0.00049227383,0.0010759773,0.0028364544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023996586,0.00043276243,0.00044368513,0.00039443249,0.0020534357,0.002731047,0.0012635521,0.0018491114,0.0001882711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002991804,0.0015349819,0.32202816,0.0008938838,0.00086608157,0.0012645926,0.014160491,0.013994521,0.02339441,0.47419092,0.0024484056,0.14223176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031497734,0.000788121,0.24385603,0.00051868573,0.00063640374,0.00047153016,0.0049726483,0.07444609,0.0074573625,0.66182405,0.0044515464,0.00026263035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008183702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007279925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044865333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006702604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035684186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023727298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1810802980","doi":"10.1007/s11166-015-9216-5","title":"Probabilistic sophistication and reverse Bayesianism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Sophistication; Mathematical economics; Probabilistic logic; Subjective expected utility; Expected utility hypothesis; Representation (politics); Decision theory; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.11563006113090726,"score_gpt":0.37266609677122825,"score_spread":0.25703603564032096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1810802980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48991644,0.001449493,0.38436645,0.01587786,0.00013207081,0.00008750795,0.00022457166,0.0001444286,0.10780114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798456,0.00044259688,0.016732793,0.00032868114,0.00012435134,0.000034581375,0.00004089491,0.000019520206,0.0024310339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953774,0.0022842884,0.00036515514,0.0006296226,0.000996469,0.00034702424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9046096,0.07339816,0.007832936,0.0087715015,0.0040894747,0.001298368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01027071,0.00045173266,0.0009849919,0.001398836,0.0007639312,0.004476973,0.0011701767,0.002378736,0.006301115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07259145,0.00088243856,0.0012529274,0.0010011666,0.0055375774,0.010470662,0.0027141953,0.0035272343,0.00047191692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000761378,0.00003656286,0.002142378,0.000063650405,0.000054625732,0.00008335596,0.00035768255,0.0066346256,0.00022969578,0.9798663,0.00043933844,0.0100155445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011010837,0.000008105529,0.0005898214,0.0000068852955,0.000014795605,0.00006487396,0.00003058779,0.0074514747,0.00006543455,0.99130356,0.0004443457,0.0000090621925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009715807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007465542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01027071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010115702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006724432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054317355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1813082302","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1844","title":"‘Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is!’: Effects of Streaks on Confidence and Betting in a Binary Choice Task","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Medical Research Council","keywords":"Roulette; Stochastic game; Psychology; Outcome (game theory); Task (project management); Randomness; Social psychology; Confidence interval; Econometrics; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08297874841532561,"score_gpt":0.41757058493766,"score_spread":0.33459183652233443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1813082302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992569,0.00002972941,0.0001945706,0.000020676891,0.000006328616,0.0000097895645,0.000031932927,0.00001534949,0.00043478297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826556,0.000044250297,0.0009403874,0.000061168044,0.000010878391,0.00005117083,0.00010897273,0.000027609909,0.0004900127],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983411,0.00064882636,0.00016945237,0.000276245,0.00047322232,0.000091181275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9609307,0.027845258,0.006916368,0.0021534653,0.00059872813,0.0015553304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023600704,0.00051650166,0.0006518392,0.00034845027,0.00021017846,0.0010272891,0.0005484641,0.0008935879,0.002635316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031486597,0.00052445236,0.000217742,0.0002406073,0.0005936275,0.0006423649,0.0006600825,0.0012997313,0.0003067916],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08305247,0.014823894,0.24280404,0.00063460576,0.00090347393,0.0008408724,0.0031308087,0.009210655,0.5777213,0.0009087032,0.0016470425,0.064322144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008174541,0.012792806,0.94074285,0.00006154033,0.00020562627,0.00037174995,0.0002761955,0.020418633,0.021974772,0.0014641227,0.00075365533,0.00012060888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087813404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009502056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002635316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021151477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013753945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012481451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1822084430","doi":"10.1287/moor.2014.0709","title":"Analogy in Decision Making","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics of Operations Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Generality; Mathematics; Preference; Mathematical economics; Operator (biology); Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.6559170799496467,"score_gpt":0.6101930257580186,"score_spread":0.04572405419162806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1822084430","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013640777,0.014665251,0.84522784,0.008678013,0.0008825476,0.0001733152,0.00020662736,0.00012362734,0.11640206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6655249,0.011150461,0.3024205,0.0030245744,0.0020894527,0.0007833714,0.0002841199,0.00009907017,0.014623485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991478,0.004968941,0.0005036624,0.00115986,0.0015538073,0.0003357368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99123925,0.0067259613,0.0005152868,0.0007069566,0.0005506259,0.00026190595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006910658,0.0014896656,0.001499146,0.0025282346,0.0019342888,0.005130975,0.0017055414,0.003056227,0.009079025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012976347,0.0005427294,0.0021964083,0.0034775266,0.010106187,0.009156812,0.0036569836,0.0049597593,0.0011482801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004626353,0.0000080977115,0.000050747767,0.000055551376,0.000011722497,0.0000194844,0.00009368383,0.0022398534,0.00004141272,0.9935108,0.00038019434,0.0035838066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043093805,0.000008723721,0.00002868864,0.000021952212,0.0000033679962,0.000017606159,0.000026738944,0.0035373452,0.000028725412,0.99240816,0.0039101667,0.0000040960786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013197786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086214475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009079025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003962673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016011709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036547482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1851457994","doi":"10.1002/hipo.22318","title":"An Allais paradox without mental time travel","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hippocampus","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; York University","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Université de Genève; National Science Foundation; National Institutes of Health; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Regret; Certainty; Psychology; Chronesthesia; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Cognitive psychology; Temporal lobe; Episodic memory; Irrational number; Cognition; Neuroscience; Philosophy; Computer science; Epilepsy","score_opus":0.056841196635600916,"score_gpt":0.3709184966585977,"score_spread":0.31407730002299683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1851457994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.378471,0.004831582,0.12127429,0.06240614,0.0014816731,0.00011747671,0.0011620261,0.00041453433,0.42984134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979404,0.00078499154,0.006627774,0.0013172578,0.00025504737,0.000044948607,0.000111442765,0.000044408418,0.0114102485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993118,0.0001793078,0.000044877255,0.00018747282,0.00017082167,0.00010572222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949492,0.002401333,0.0006666461,0.0010920861,0.00045935652,0.00043124452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013370215,0.00027092127,0.00066128833,0.0006559182,0.0011945394,0.00267945,0.00074929895,0.001693238,0.016309973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013692737,0.00017020477,0.00078131765,0.0007146999,0.0041849837,0.008043906,0.002372773,0.002513972,0.0012913751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009785719,0.000016042166,0.00043183536,0.000041426647,0.000017462398,0.0002060019,0.00014283997,0.0013870408,0.00031509317,0.9863544,0.0039024143,0.0070875655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034080935,0.000007988912,0.00034891156,0.000007685295,0.0000057756,0.00016564316,0.00009304365,0.0035772591,0.00011441367,0.98943174,0.0062036915,0.000009745234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024211083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013276481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016309973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012519718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077883044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05456233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1852307141","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2028146","title":"Towards a Purely Behavioral Definition of Loss Aversion","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Loss aversion; Prospect theory; Expected utility hypothesis; Isoelastic utility; Risk aversion (psychology); Intuition; Economics; Ambiguity aversion; Cumulative prospect theory; Mathematical economics; Preference; Subjective expected utility; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13981529564130787,"score_gpt":0.39163071546207434,"score_spread":0.2518154198207665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1852307141","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021120897,0.00094958255,0.90550596,0.012840264,0.00058732845,0.00005353909,0.00017372706,0.0001149116,0.058653783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81529367,0.0017867654,0.16141194,0.005525237,0.0022132143,0.0004334079,0.00022778717,0.00015730038,0.012950719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962398,0.0018158233,0.00022307357,0.00059093453,0.00090189755,0.00022851916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933744,0.0034647293,0.00062003435,0.00084193406,0.0013253114,0.00037352796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004812563,0.0013004049,0.0014083083,0.0015026368,0.0008727184,0.0052808733,0.0023110656,0.003442168,0.0056897337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008719755,0.0005926806,0.0011970139,0.0009851946,0.007226812,0.009201064,0.003088171,0.007636332,0.0010289424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004428872,0.000022259863,0.0001403143,0.000024827652,0.000009731897,0.000016023136,0.000054368338,0.00069353223,0.0001433407,0.99627656,0.0004876027,0.0021270758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047802564,0.000007866225,0.00012915392,0.000010720514,0.000004059641,0.000022599324,0.00001962576,0.004083169,0.000046363686,0.99493116,0.00073484704,0.000005630333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042810314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003091885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056897337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011984531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011340745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0254516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1859258661","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2283","title":"Stanovich's Who Is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2548337427983532,"score_gpt":0.420949601165849,"score_spread":0.16611585836749582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1859258661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04112923,0.12061343,0.08975364,0.12257441,0.0033385498,0.00006283286,0.00038372513,0.00021227055,0.6219319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8373402,0.05167754,0.02075686,0.009816328,0.0031159562,0.00011477522,0.00024270355,0.00019046223,0.076745234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830234,0.00094605185,0.000069404334,0.0001684798,0.00042308928,0.00009065094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842838,0.013887708,0.00037151756,0.0005747137,0.00063143764,0.00025086044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035423841,0.0005180528,0.000731472,0.0013548357,0.0009655158,0.004720535,0.0009103262,0.001388196,0.0051940475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01274568,0.00036095068,0.00049840997,0.0016324905,0.010809905,0.0067270794,0.0008953703,0.0035552986,0.0010180392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015974445,0.000014589159,0.0004553963,0.000082971485,0.000015542968,0.00002380526,0.0011923132,0.000510133,0.00005156624,0.970198,0.013707254,0.013732467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005196338,0.0000053446806,0.0003011284,0.000058739563,0.0000057226475,0.000021683041,0.00025978725,0.00032101787,0.000038567963,0.9777711,0.021207416,0.000004301822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015986611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016723545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051940475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017074797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012071524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018734097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1865669801","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1598444","title":"Causal Reasoning in Financial Reporting and Voluntary Disclosure","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntary disclosure; Causal reasoning; Key (lock); Psychology; Causal chain; Motivated reasoning; Finance; Business; Computer science; Cognition; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09341045711007619,"score_gpt":0.3551084396708432,"score_spread":0.26169798256076704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1865669801","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41537428,0.0058455216,0.45612368,0.06439174,0.0008263503,0.00039043595,0.00066564215,0.00029008926,0.056092303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97636855,0.00091292924,0.01899239,0.00064586004,0.00038647692,0.000089732894,0.00015156681,0.00001857456,0.0024340486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9764113,0.017832221,0.0012101862,0.0015189867,0.0018319883,0.0011953254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62331516,0.3457775,0.016370002,0.007334367,0.0054047233,0.0017981577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035228536,0.00078040385,0.0014505044,0.0029797645,0.0017868323,0.006868987,0.0021817312,0.00622251,0.011394384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2043783,0.0013603591,0.00196481,0.0018475403,0.0064181085,0.011063789,0.0022144904,0.0046683517,0.0005521423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002705763,0.00026170714,0.0050077206,0.00020553778,0.00014192288,0.00041674727,0.0009347252,0.015458109,0.00012196935,0.9588014,0.0015407236,0.016838875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005303344,0.000015338659,0.00067745376,0.000022761484,0.00003379347,0.00006249831,0.00013183171,0.022809932,0.00007857135,0.9757312,0.00036764017,0.000015961336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004802625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028487064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035228536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025496727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003735413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1863085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868583142","doi":"10.3982/te800","title":"The evolution of decision and experienced utilities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Incentive; Economics; Microeconomics; Utility theory; Expected utility hypothesis; Public economics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.08113580645377999,"score_gpt":0.33657132646442,"score_spread":0.25543552001064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868583142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8255481,0.00082533027,0.1320955,0.0023087205,0.0000825807,0.000044397064,0.00018432141,0.000047790534,0.03886327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98786616,0.00014148557,0.010351524,0.00008423573,0.000012814713,0.000018261522,0.00004301663,0.000011294264,0.0014710459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970778,0.0017943394,0.0000971333,0.00049463933,0.00036323903,0.00017283052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991855,0.004677465,0.0010332477,0.0010091249,0.0008345364,0.0005905966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044103856,0.00028047318,0.000273032,0.0005510915,0.00046210425,0.0033245303,0.0005853369,0.00088390615,0.0031322157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028329363,0.00034218267,0.0002717053,0.0004903229,0.0029763707,0.0035400097,0.0012593936,0.0013871216,0.0002169733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037623223,0.00015092816,0.036434427,0.00010992465,0.0001709893,0.00028240745,0.0023665684,0.02311012,0.0046548243,0.87684226,0.0007513591,0.054749966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007771805,0.00020333187,0.043108,0.00006157169,0.00008224946,0.0003091135,0.00092178816,0.055300202,0.002299634,0.8902029,0.007341246,0.00009220687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010565409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008441447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044103856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017882583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048411664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023324609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1881113879","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2609347","title":"A Practitioner's Guide to Nudging","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.044093369937114345,"score_gpt":0.38613912861252064,"score_spread":0.3420457586754063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1881113879","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008069712,0.02688811,0.64749616,0.07961665,0.017194195,0.0025679755,0.0044273585,0.006698233,0.21430436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007205644,0.02667436,0.65292,0.027514992,0.003908019,0.0059097493,0.003133769,0.0029421493,0.26979125],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879596,0.006760172,0.0013234871,0.0004732934,0.0030639798,0.0004194015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95263654,0.025888583,0.0008297196,0.004004788,0.015140415,0.0014998649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017807633,0.0021252767,0.0024444505,0.010085006,0.004204883,0.0074741472,0.005103197,0.0075184866,0.09529233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076111555,0.0016857682,0.0017631046,0.008887709,0.0061764396,0.009477943,0.0058505987,0.011955013,0.07647043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003646473,0.00015130609,0.00021250114,0.00068187097,0.000009691538,0.0001944985,0.001153872,0.00045921284,0.00029826758,0.08717899,0.7044539,0.20516956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130445305,0.000019884976,0.00019398028,0.0012286284,0.0000064166443,0.00017761493,0.00064444845,0.0006220015,0.00013821246,0.06537575,0.93155,0.00002997875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011949056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021240676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09529233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004223434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014095154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3187846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1882539431","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1280","title":"The subjective valuation of coins and bills","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Economics; Representativeness heuristic; Humanities; Philosophy; Mathematics; Finance","score_opus":0.2800842834621254,"score_gpt":0.40967951739696495,"score_spread":0.12959523393483957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1882539431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93629014,0.0012200121,0.020307684,0.0008466362,0.00015704749,0.00014569593,0.00023169775,0.000022075117,0.040779043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956299,0.00023744584,0.002655072,0.000091507995,0.000039013412,0.000045245168,0.00010102001,0.000010083073,0.0011907323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98387444,0.011798612,0.0007566278,0.0006215312,0.0027616327,0.00018719111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8773406,0.08239442,0.020732917,0.009535614,0.00824833,0.0017481068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013724114,0.0004714437,0.0005480264,0.0015161724,0.00047508406,0.0039518676,0.00049716537,0.0009918035,0.0052916147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13704935,0.00023726081,0.0004137042,0.0010906123,0.0028367566,0.0028920427,0.0012611906,0.00086768955,0.00037714088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006707257,0.0010207843,0.2745669,0.002155332,0.0015406248,0.0015945313,0.023634657,0.025366487,0.022599945,0.3564009,0.005376496,0.2790362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003875879,0.0030072688,0.4481478,0.00143142,0.00088544446,0.0017668369,0.01903325,0.05241808,0.012594144,0.4231907,0.036643054,0.0004943681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081292493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048255292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013724114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007680477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034484713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07258093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893249250","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1286","title":"The reversing influence of involvement on the framing effect: The role of emotions and negativity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing effect; Framing (construction); Moderation; Psychology; Negativity effect; Social psychology; Humanities; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.12235277587360686,"score_gpt":0.362216426689113,"score_spread":0.23986365081550615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893249250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768,0.00019080561,0.0029232553,0.00036479274,0.000028228502,0.000026836722,0.000033469885,0.000009475973,0.019623227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999124,0.00003709422,0.00051432324,0.00004441668,0.000013591445,0.000008310241,0.000008069116,0.0000032458136,0.00024698288],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653023,0.0025315753,0.00009022289,0.00026769153,0.00040642664,0.0001739762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94092155,0.04976124,0.0045779813,0.0024081934,0.0011792774,0.0011517229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067320927,0.00032391417,0.00036386313,0.00053427054,0.0004973739,0.0016288388,0.00030329564,0.0005971009,0.005180526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024615262,0.00016900111,0.00037529957,0.00022566837,0.0021494064,0.0008816116,0.0012061634,0.0012964766,0.00017693905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008801752,0.0035811535,0.58669037,0.0006833758,0.0005319946,0.001836847,0.019924434,0.0041245744,0.08846127,0.09258259,0.0012751346,0.19150653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021688628,0.0015338286,0.9274985,0.00015443224,0.00050944247,0.0005490251,0.0056182947,0.0070981914,0.013009306,0.04014953,0.0035359168,0.0001265802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009946153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074757007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067320927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050686416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034394354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1899520281","doi":"","title":"CONTEXTUAL CONTROL OF ACCRUAL THRESHOLDS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of Fechner Day","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Discriminative model; Stimulus (psychology); Psychology; Accrual; Context effect; Stimulus control; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.056033858537471164,"score_gpt":0.3402327385139502,"score_spread":0.284198879976479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1899520281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93825763,0.0016221757,0.05088434,0.00017335133,0.000061226165,0.00009275608,0.00017312978,0.00035636814,0.008378936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887729,0.00026230607,0.010228875,0.000045625235,0.000021858807,0.000043611824,0.00009869036,0.00009735695,0.00042884308],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832064,0.00037963188,0.00015789826,0.0005063801,0.0004441982,0.00019122992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98682564,0.0070502474,0.0017322976,0.0026874563,0.0009342831,0.00077007525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020316725,0.00037150708,0.0005937639,0.0004947855,0.00034326973,0.0018096992,0.0008397504,0.0003933657,0.0023806624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019257681,0.00049356336,0.00032304449,0.0003335273,0.0007306725,0.0016995692,0.0018973723,0.0011835272,0.0002691851],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028423038,0.00036390754,0.028893135,0.0004157096,0.00013057451,0.00040357295,0.000733565,0.008141882,0.8640687,0.023393163,0.00045260266,0.07016084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019982539,0.0031835393,0.27407703,0.00018517842,0.0005135811,0.0012529123,0.00051866163,0.06924207,0.5815917,0.060261652,0.008708866,0.00026492315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000726101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008404272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023806624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047828883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043289614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010744631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953073323","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1757240","title":"Effects of Spikes in the Price of Gasoline on Behavioral Intentions: A Mental Accounting Explanation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mental accounting; Psychology; Gasoline; Behavioral economics; Economics; Accounting; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.08391627872076415,"score_gpt":0.370578488770261,"score_spread":0.2866622100494969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953073323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99146163,0.00006376582,0.0020766766,0.0013143213,0.000039873194,0.000039614246,0.0002596907,0.00003887094,0.004705576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99847275,0.00005351609,0.0007463142,0.00013515234,0.000019318282,0.00001361223,0.00011937201,0.000011260993,0.0004287181],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989704,0.00040745334,0.000072708724,0.00021675952,0.00016396857,0.00016863596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95132774,0.03794011,0.0049013644,0.0037680476,0.0010576679,0.001005174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028390803,0.0005881156,0.00060456875,0.0006795556,0.00046942508,0.0028824059,0.0008527129,0.0023869153,0.007972699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039232537,0.0007097299,0.0010000037,0.00059341453,0.0012285244,0.0020953792,0.0013363353,0.0026573478,0.00040406222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009520857,0.0061364314,0.8124306,0.00027513382,0.0013822598,0.0014225356,0.0036371166,0.032159533,0.017916052,0.047363102,0.0027584357,0.06499797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040227015,0.0007053802,0.8634407,0.00004407508,0.0005442347,0.00023131935,0.0012174252,0.07305617,0.0027229334,0.056831982,0.00063608424,0.00016730107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0104406765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005886881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0104406765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007819847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007780296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02667129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W195370548","doi":"","title":"Utility: Anticipated, Experienced, and Remembered","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Context (archaeology); Normative; Pain and pleasure; Expected utility hypothesis; Marginal utility; Psychology; Action (physics); Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Subjective expected utility; Utility maximization; Positive economics; Economics; Epistemology; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Philosophy; Computer science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.21730538265588908,"score_gpt":0.42070613985828387,"score_spread":0.20340075720239478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W195370548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50927067,0.031102732,0.1629726,0.014552978,0.0006999843,0.00019592156,0.0010942285,0.00015323139,0.27995768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884974,0.002980132,0.00602075,0.00027626808,0.00010600699,0.000038901697,0.000109676796,0.00001977541,0.0019511462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982028,0.0008588692,0.0000979384,0.00022568804,0.0004810795,0.00013362574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99580896,0.0022959872,0.0006127869,0.00037400977,0.0005560871,0.00035222026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025524197,0.00038317908,0.00032595408,0.0013938241,0.0005995567,0.005108514,0.00064084755,0.0009269834,0.0037423382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01766791,0.00024207769,0.0002720773,0.001553531,0.0063462816,0.008285711,0.0018062638,0.0014129727,0.0003270956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031154027,0.00011303112,0.029214378,0.0003919149,0.00015675645,0.00036657412,0.017569207,0.0033471065,0.0010094007,0.80960804,0.003208609,0.13470344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023527686,0.0002042333,0.04440449,0.0006358637,0.00007522299,0.00063512125,0.009369326,0.0038807674,0.0006626436,0.90486705,0.03511418,0.00012761155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019765773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018245365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005108514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017450907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074178225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1956640694","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01650.x","title":"A simple explanation of some key time preference anomalies","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Context (archaeology); Preference; Economics; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Microeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.4353922798807204,"score_gpt":0.25875474403527104,"score_spread":0.17663753584544933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1956640694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4799166,0.0008790586,0.44792983,0.0123597095,0.00072209846,0.00015479475,0.0012332037,0.0016793535,0.055125374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736168,0.00023144671,0.021832917,0.00040880387,0.000109204,0.000051620187,0.00017720927,0.000052003426,0.0035200487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968255,0.0000607754,0.000024744817,0.00008433227,0.00009995956,0.000047606583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978865,0.0008366797,0.00039048077,0.000564302,0.00022298165,0.000099122415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009120444,0.00042410582,0.00039078004,0.0004331471,0.00030382987,0.0010927671,0.0010485062,0.0012340583,0.0068510706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067879385,0.00016907122,0.0005274025,0.0005079502,0.0006341007,0.002261992,0.0007030941,0.0016087864,0.00068041356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017807036,0.00012416611,0.0056883483,0.00015255748,0.000038300623,0.00031327983,0.0004496647,0.011583907,0.014720917,0.92269623,0.004563697,0.03949083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005018931,0.00006917708,0.0041984054,0.000015000394,0.000018638531,0.00030742917,0.00008578574,0.07659094,0.003517777,0.9112029,0.0039057606,0.00003798922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007950447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005103348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068510706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048682443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045318267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022919118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963395863","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02047.x","title":"Framing effects and risk‐sensitive decision making","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Framing effect; Prospect theory; Psychology; Risk-seeking; Social psychology; Decision theory; Risk perception; Perception; Economics; Microeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.08641672518660555,"score_gpt":0.409250412450968,"score_spread":0.32283368726436246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963395863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93551326,0.0009941987,0.027735315,0.0011423652,0.00009836694,0.00009345857,0.000048659793,0.000027570975,0.0343467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99417865,0.00031283408,0.0048111314,0.0001147584,0.000027156293,0.000031612,0.000024261926,0.0000046574764,0.00049490604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969158,0.0019988252,0.00008641419,0.00022792959,0.00060717785,0.00016388917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837008,0.012552348,0.0018257523,0.0008577645,0.00055321236,0.0005101403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006361855,0.00045110116,0.0003547396,0.0008460653,0.0005190381,0.0022105437,0.00030910567,0.0008043952,0.0035269812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023240972,0.00037461004,0.00055882474,0.000360209,0.0021301778,0.0018335495,0.0012356614,0.0014748753,0.00016032401],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003170856,0.0013132357,0.103955165,0.0009234932,0.0006169575,0.0014546638,0.01973545,0.024192816,0.04689273,0.580702,0.0023619516,0.2146807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028572584,0.00090317073,0.13203189,0.00025259476,0.00030758037,0.0005543307,0.00265207,0.029437758,0.008369422,0.8173944,0.007574123,0.00023687437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064937194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005197637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006361855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007842107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034827058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033645093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964086661","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.894101","title":"Measuring Performance in a Dynamic World: Conditional Mean-Variance Fundamentals","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Variance (accounting); Econometrics; Conditional variance; Statistics; Economics; Mathematics; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Accounting; Volatility (finance)","score_opus":0.05477964124988577,"score_gpt":0.33501113062242943,"score_spread":0.28023148937254366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964086661","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29697168,0.0012101734,0.67479265,0.0035834406,0.00017372888,0.00008837127,0.00033849687,0.00024391366,0.022597512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97697836,0.0004258419,0.021255638,0.00012723896,0.00011492858,0.000042607404,0.00008832493,0.000032725795,0.0009343299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.995773,0.0013369725,0.00023180226,0.0010367645,0.0010681443,0.0005532612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795585,0.014375895,0.0027039472,0.001568598,0.0012474048,0.0005456022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055086915,0.0008472719,0.0014676927,0.0012964852,0.00041226763,0.0046997503,0.0015144726,0.002236778,0.0020647617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03275401,0.00057104323,0.00071350497,0.0013303695,0.0029456052,0.006904008,0.0021530697,0.002128748,0.000388672],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013734096,0.0003331768,0.025271991,0.00019174913,0.00034369266,0.00019521838,0.000569653,0.18920422,0.004922947,0.71731967,0.0022421903,0.059268244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001662581,0.00016588694,0.024803184,0.00007062921,0.00007839607,0.00017490351,0.00014051708,0.4103405,0.001383513,0.56199044,0.0007230796,0.000112410446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018011592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010464052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055086915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012212447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010951859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029133081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964233664","doi":"10.3758/bf03193398","title":"Effects of instruction presentation mode in comparative judgments","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Randomized controlled trial; Audiology","score_opus":0.10045935363489521,"score_gpt":0.4071029732870954,"score_spread":0.30664361965220016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964233664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920724,0.0004078438,0.0023730258,0.0002492909,0.00012608977,0.00008238415,0.00016464444,0.00019043908,0.00433395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98843235,0.0002888428,0.0063092974,0.00031301723,0.00015437037,0.00021669915,0.00021674173,0.00059896236,0.0034697696],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99531484,0.0024698754,0.0005442114,0.00078874454,0.0005775641,0.00030472112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5780639,0.3999616,0.007874784,0.0065451195,0.0038703901,0.003684208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075360914,0.00089700473,0.0012110532,0.00087361614,0.0004716979,0.0034598755,0.0013181418,0.0025072242,0.024737554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19204605,0.0012998539,0.00057917985,0.00075490476,0.0008509114,0.0043991,0.0014308017,0.0027740942,0.002117884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.2609156,0.016329998,0.052273985,0.0019869579,0.00055935845,0.00096350117,0.0072969957,0.005231708,0.4810441,0.004618644,0.0020990442,0.16668007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016100846,0.060031928,0.60805905,0.0012329646,0.0033988855,0.0024624558,0.0036980012,0.069554694,0.18748221,0.04127496,0.00582707,0.00087685493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011113151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012117547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024737554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082018913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010560856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08275539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964373575","doi":"10.1007/s10683-011-9293-5","title":"Risk aversion and framing effects","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Lottery; Framing effect; Framing (construction); Normative; Stochastic game; Economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Psychology; Social psychology; Incentive; Loss aversion; Salient; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09156778749823381,"score_gpt":0.3437459284481459,"score_spread":0.2521781409499121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964373575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94034624,0.0006531387,0.0128020495,0.00088941364,0.00008900055,0.00009848259,0.00007883049,0.000056051274,0.044986848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964849,0.00015666352,0.0022608903,0.0001916884,0.000033437154,0.000038190912,0.000024826804,0.000007859494,0.00080161827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968851,0.0017668422,0.0001222446,0.0002792185,0.00078763097,0.00015883104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9633397,0.026937684,0.004596441,0.00357478,0.0008616863,0.00068973895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00585423,0.0005488236,0.00048681494,0.00064334006,0.00046600486,0.0015605311,0.00041972895,0.0008939017,0.008672682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027510364,0.00029983092,0.00038021913,0.00031776074,0.0012635473,0.0009443784,0.0010147102,0.0018827674,0.0003307387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008580834,0.008440429,0.15259798,0.0016766047,0.0010456429,0.0013006877,0.007318717,0.017943949,0.17106384,0.31263983,0.0058521205,0.31153935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017067805,0.0072764982,0.31868127,0.000591118,0.0013526283,0.0016874109,0.0026547282,0.04374829,0.055745654,0.5443395,0.021811906,0.00040423757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024315936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019194125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008672682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042405652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023196358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0309605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964499747","doi":"10.3758/s13421-013-0318-5","title":"Act first, think later: The presence and absence of inferential planning in problem solving","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Problem solver; Heuristics; Irrational number; Solver; Psychology; Maximization; Ball (mathematics); Mathematical optimization; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08864594523575228,"score_gpt":0.34869097728367643,"score_spread":0.2600450320479242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964499747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9382348,0.0013203807,0.039371572,0.0028994502,0.00010993202,0.00009882505,0.00030547392,0.00017455399,0.017485013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879645,0.00032609337,0.010724619,0.00020573004,0.00006605494,0.00007414487,0.00016721667,0.00007561705,0.00039607237],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928289,0.0033020347,0.0006141614,0.001371163,0.0015180649,0.0003657151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82721454,0.14016283,0.011319761,0.015337507,0.0021943324,0.0037710778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012153442,0.00052337046,0.0011071259,0.0017488586,0.00084102276,0.005430252,0.0020256196,0.0027406942,0.004343656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10997943,0.0021792317,0.0006403182,0.0013998016,0.00654405,0.0110653695,0.00341493,0.005599903,0.00050762563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016427806,0.0067478404,0.1598771,0.0022136248,0.0010831278,0.0011601297,0.012576838,0.032823868,0.04682881,0.2812063,0.0037341013,0.43532056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011344551,0.0010326381,0.10927515,0.00016139397,0.0004740973,0.0012557902,0.0011145214,0.09977261,0.007133073,0.77646667,0.0019644005,0.00021528566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020672027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015187634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012153442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007089735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027232324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06427431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965607475","doi":"10.1506/car.25.3.6","title":"Debiasing Scale Compatibility Effects when Investors Use Nonfinancial Measures to Screen Potential Investments*","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibility (geochemistry); Business; Scale (ratio); Finance; Actuarial science; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.41434849713991234,"score_gpt":0.44236783766142707,"score_spread":0.028019340521514724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965607475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96469074,0.00023331659,0.012263911,0.00045895245,0.00008528479,0.00031106666,0.000093062794,0.00016474543,0.021698907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897827,0.000079027566,0.008185959,0.0005198509,0.00003483056,0.000106803935,0.00007721324,0.00004371544,0.0011699516],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915622,0.00319831,0.00082371745,0.00089118624,0.0032806913,0.00024388246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8800592,0.080822326,0.022038782,0.012404349,0.0034408043,0.0012345171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011974263,0.00059860485,0.0004924822,0.0011237438,0.00040771338,0.0013880044,0.00047888688,0.0009922482,0.006678446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09190607,0.00037841743,0.000553522,0.00054150965,0.0010247906,0.002048161,0.00166556,0.0015861968,0.00050612236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009214529,0.003724647,0.40322793,0.0008747781,0.00083033723,0.0009615261,0.008287696,0.0028779164,0.20734863,0.022293357,0.0051712566,0.33518732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005774359,0.004781853,0.88762957,0.00022332862,0.0004160277,0.0011333659,0.0016911842,0.0119553795,0.059186757,0.024545029,0.0076715355,0.00018851353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050893327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062763714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011974263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004123572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034859977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06332672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965630026","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12022","title":"The Impact of Better-than-Average Bias and Relative Performance Pay on Performance Outcome Satisfaction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Perspectives","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Operationalization; Expectancy theory; Job satisfaction; Social psychology; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08668877675148916,"score_gpt":0.3836835178172323,"score_spread":0.29699474106574314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965630026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99786276,0.000042789696,0.00027868722,0.000081695674,0.0000029124087,0.000005822454,0.000021457405,0.0000028783627,0.0017010669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99978215,0.0000111329755,0.00008725294,0.000013224228,0.0000040127698,0.0000037180284,0.00001841707,0.0000011568455,0.00007895151],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99334645,0.0035123485,0.00047067902,0.00035568958,0.0016406159,0.0006741452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9102564,0.05634614,0.021736402,0.003117045,0.0031082258,0.005435821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073464494,0.00026210985,0.00035731844,0.0008127905,0.0005435715,0.0018039716,0.00025808465,0.00046773316,0.0035227942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0314273,0.00014524246,0.0005113115,0.00072315126,0.0012225646,0.00065634155,0.0011511248,0.00096123666,0.00023208084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004056749,0.0002485509,0.9863582,0.0000204527,0.00007426274,0.00004939912,0.000787902,0.00026579195,0.0008801888,0.00048947503,0.0000642144,0.010355928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000864968,0.00023326569,0.9974383,0.0000069311827,0.00002257268,0.00004032459,0.0006847135,0.00070779055,0.00040195914,0.00035483192,0.00009233878,0.000008224588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022415335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027274743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073464494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068211893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007513547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038852215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965965555","doi":"10.3758/bf03195464","title":"MouseTrace: A better mousetrap for catching decision processes","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Toledo","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Computer science; Process (computing); Decision process; Extension (predicate logic); Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Data mining; Management science; Engineering; Programming language","score_opus":0.5684489168392943,"score_gpt":0.5922242640286576,"score_spread":0.02377534718936325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965965555","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013251701,0.00085639575,0.8616763,0.00092849584,0.0007396095,0.00044514216,0.0037952461,0.112387076,0.0059200507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10894037,0.00089785707,0.8359087,0.0023194652,0.00029962842,0.0024605345,0.0039307848,0.02472149,0.020521117],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981781,0.00064606743,0.00016428005,0.00030811326,0.00052283576,0.0001805391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900214,0.0058985287,0.00043160605,0.001914719,0.0011566327,0.0005771087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031722605,0.0019512799,0.0018950647,0.0014043107,0.000495027,0.002014158,0.0027305044,0.00287355,0.05914766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016492762,0.0008853075,0.0014506433,0.0010006827,0.00053842267,0.0036560178,0.0028162543,0.0023254072,0.010969775],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006807869,0.0011395491,0.0062491554,0.0018255046,0.0009882114,0.00056313997,0.00078958046,0.016189363,0.050880536,0.042153973,0.1962502,0.6761629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036542309,0.0022806576,0.010656794,0.0008602804,0.0010741217,0.0016550377,0.00016617864,0.509418,0.08504798,0.08929426,0.2948541,0.0010382526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015579477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00204894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05914766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003941568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010839233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19786865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966428987","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.04.026","title":"Discounting of money and sex: Effects of commodity and temporal position in stimulant-dependent men and women","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Addictive Behaviors","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse","keywords":"Delay discounting; Discounting; Addiction; Impulsivity; Psychology; Temporal discounting; Economics; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.023712582037255334,"score_gpt":0.326662955939349,"score_spread":0.3029503739020937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966428987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997129,0.00006663086,0.000010446673,0.000020883535,0.0000019747777,0.000001320342,0.000024234037,6.176791e-7,0.0001608746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922633,0.00008672862,0.000027865408,0.000014123844,0.0000049220325,0.0000024568058,0.000043775435,0.0000021234118,0.0005918246],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998505,0.000056418856,0.000010632288,0.000024794805,0.00002107889,0.000036496753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967435,0.0016906331,0.000667362,0.0001800801,0.000074199495,0.0006442382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075214193,0.00027130073,0.00034505085,0.00039511558,0.0003995032,0.00096280815,0.00031928305,0.0004896972,0.005511683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048024156,0.0004568717,0.0005136441,0.00033470782,0.0005411284,0.00055232045,0.0004739817,0.0007363587,0.0003082552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015705287,0.0017445295,0.96696144,0.000042405187,0.0002816011,0.00023399806,0.0020249886,0.00029661084,0.004984592,0.0002998523,0.00012460547,0.0073001175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065757406,0.0009494191,0.9964809,0.0000049742134,0.00009639202,0.00012430128,0.0010870673,0.0005578282,0.00029670875,0.00019943256,0.0001258781,0.000011350127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007426281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008986019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007426281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002648823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028309875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018438399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966720862","doi":"10.1177/0272989x03256004","title":"Fast and Frugal Models of Clinical Judgment in Novice and Expert Physicians","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Infection and Immunity","funders":"","keywords":"Vignette; Heuristic; Matching (statistics); Psychology; Value (mathematics); Clinical judgment; Logistic regression; Medicine; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Medical physics; Pathology","score_opus":0.18905995399552714,"score_gpt":0.481086002958928,"score_spread":0.2920260489634009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966720862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94630885,0.0004105833,0.044452135,0.000779991,0.000055862198,0.00024982204,0.00011158538,0.000060311304,0.007570802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882752,0.0000899614,0.010952517,0.00012542483,0.00002309173,0.00013026308,0.0000748095,0.00000890663,0.0003198687],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9700768,0.024800057,0.00080153154,0.0010613855,0.0026047057,0.00065557146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81363666,0.15757251,0.014499784,0.006860023,0.005312201,0.0021188129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027960967,0.0008220448,0.0007498994,0.0031571726,0.0006350759,0.0030103133,0.0012298598,0.0011327276,0.0027143788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21050514,0.00058601197,0.001059306,0.0012466136,0.0027681026,0.0037639276,0.002026608,0.0012123164,0.00031447964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008283044,0.001732842,0.36126643,0.0011800609,0.001079893,0.0017670683,0.023897532,0.23916703,0.0016306022,0.11372456,0.007378329,0.23889257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000519051,0.0021103863,0.075948015,0.0003504913,0.0001608623,0.0012666866,0.0058152415,0.8066127,0.0006292532,0.10418337,0.0021764222,0.00022747918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00369452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040772627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027960967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025901343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00129605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14787352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966993054","doi":"10.1136/ip.2003.003624","title":"Do children’s intentions to risk take relate to actual risk taking?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Injury Prevention","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Human factors and ergonomics; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Forensic engineering; Injury prevention; Psychology; Occupational safety and health; Environmental health; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.06755703274500012,"score_gpt":0.40286026832787264,"score_spread":0.3353032355828725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966993054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99920374,0.00013499909,0.00007513467,0.00005706853,0.0000023360994,0.0000029241485,0.00008513093,0.0000023037164,0.00043638295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912864,0.00024962937,0.00021401652,0.000011574522,0.0000033416013,0.000009319418,0.0001548412,0.0000028112174,0.00022588056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991003,0.00022748424,0.000103604434,0.0001593734,0.00026188872,0.00014731225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98529077,0.00424233,0.008396422,0.00041061215,0.00084377825,0.00081600266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017666431,0.00028020432,0.00029052762,0.00076164294,0.00019929027,0.0012511344,0.00034804223,0.0005881321,0.0022454453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014669098,0.00034904122,0.00042625787,0.0005378364,0.0007740713,0.00081309886,0.00051342254,0.00087541394,0.0004249083],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000211958,0.000037192265,0.9968196,0.000014675965,0.000015440415,0.000038555147,0.00080159085,0.000049713628,0.000107297805,0.00005228968,0.00003869671,0.002003725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014792362,0.000065616674,0.99862754,0.000015943668,0.000013203287,0.00010087207,0.0007238863,0.00008762622,0.00017093765,0.00006559372,0.00012359835,0.0000037003501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070730885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069302553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070730885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039913357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039304598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014063835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968966047","doi":"10.1126/science.1238041","title":"Poverty Impedes Cognitive Function","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2909,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Poverty; Tamil; Cognition; Perspective (graphical); Poverty rate; Economics; Business; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.11925443234987178,"score_gpt":0.40424292129877165,"score_spread":0.2849884889488999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968966047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99228877,0.0003812747,0.0006416691,0.0005384892,0.00001052133,0.0000105162935,0.00007367111,0.000008458634,0.0060466044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822086,0.00030344256,0.0004876726,0.00012813398,0.000006416439,0.00001443184,0.000031514224,0.0000039323136,0.0008036361],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993216,0.00020072144,0.00004575244,0.00008729013,0.00012582143,0.0002189181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997086,0.0010231221,0.0008160896,0.00027740045,0.00033295486,0.0004644545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010582478,0.00030766358,0.00026900374,0.0005854451,0.0005881111,0.0011708752,0.00032481682,0.00042598063,0.0046013794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004802347,0.00018169769,0.00027789845,0.00025534316,0.0009791291,0.000701563,0.0019372036,0.0007007295,0.00030124065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017675976,0.0022055602,0.66203016,0.0010564415,0.00043728814,0.0024341883,0.012253206,0.0018210742,0.07524711,0.016946634,0.0050233826,0.21877742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031728123,0.0010504097,0.9602187,0.00021559348,0.00009343182,0.0010874959,0.0036429004,0.0012291067,0.0073984005,0.016378729,0.008609478,0.00004394922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026329034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027004108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046013794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045228074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006084945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015393198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969204312","doi":"10.1007/s40429-015-0045-z","title":"Using Behavior Economics to Understand Alcohol Use Disorders: a Concise Review and Identification of Research Priorities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Current Addiction Reports","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Psychology; Discounting; Psychological intervention; Reinforcement; Delay discounting; Randomized controlled trial; Identification (biology); Clinical psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Impulsivity; Social psychology","score_opus":0.768445325675827,"score_gpt":0.6113633404578281,"score_spread":0.15708198521799888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969204312","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000062990985,0.9992792,0.00014300135,0.00032933764,0.000052479525,0.000006173367,0.000023448372,0.000001943822,0.00010146873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00073443574,0.998589,0.00032730665,0.00019947079,0.000096411415,0.000009532158,0.000016477887,7.6151485e-7,0.000026604244],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998111,0.0006926571,0.00048515914,0.00021470677,0.00043678816,0.000059623453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852255,0.012398232,0.0013638445,0.00014519932,0.0007403018,0.00012696265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045761704,0.0014190854,0.004251697,0.004208528,0.00028578975,0.0025590982,0.0016555137,0.0019569602,0.002789141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014901728,0.00055590924,0.002626996,0.005185542,0.00093326665,0.0025074433,0.0010579342,0.0023732597,0.00042747107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017927123,0.00017186732,0.0011441185,0.19931084,0.0025110513,0.00012282486,0.000112516354,0.0011967514,0.00023265778,0.007614346,0.014457798,0.7729459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033433794,0.00051129074,0.009870018,0.3193942,0.014183507,0.0018888158,0.00049695966,0.0019976506,0.0006785709,0.036905322,0.61343724,0.00030210923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033036422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065516704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045761704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016195847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051985187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024201453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969624676","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2000.2941","title":"Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":335,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Consumer choice; Econometric model; Consumer behaviour; Task (project management); Choice set; Empirical research; Econometrics; Construct (python library); Computer science; Management science; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.15523496886584218,"score_gpt":0.3955967711956773,"score_spread":0.24036180232983514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969624676","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38553888,0.0020802203,0.5706677,0.007968487,0.00009465137,0.00014962153,0.00019861749,0.00008979386,0.033212118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96093655,0.00073362276,0.03695352,0.00019073758,0.000107781845,0.00012944087,0.00004041372,0.000016779153,0.00089106534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983925,0.0009802228,0.00005293751,0.00013338374,0.0003198675,0.00012091013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980682,0.016339742,0.0013648082,0.00064257387,0.0004939386,0.00047694737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032871782,0.0007442477,0.0008313345,0.0019387215,0.00081379147,0.004383279,0.0011780972,0.0018333059,0.0032386035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016704516,0.0004884474,0.0010952455,0.00202712,0.0036916968,0.007056144,0.0019402547,0.0019966708,0.00019263593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007753601,0.00033359992,0.014928785,0.00011253529,0.00014144504,0.00011583127,0.0010408998,0.04766072,0.0005031956,0.91846186,0.00069820724,0.01592538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028336417,0.000049170005,0.0038610438,0.000027597976,0.000038823815,0.000063353815,0.00031660643,0.1309041,0.00011844339,0.8633903,0.0011729586,0.000029249435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023823257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022371344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004383279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015922785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013195662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01738447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969725632","doi":"10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00468-x","title":"Incorporating wealth information into a multiple criteria decision making model","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.29484286713895896,"score_gpt":0.5033476173833448,"score_spread":0.2085047502443858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969725632","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12711728,0.0003704925,0.8642805,0.0011860493,0.0001066737,0.000109501125,0.00020257982,0.00015342448,0.006473507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9155972,0.00027128242,0.0771207,0.000113620285,0.00006758662,0.00017694233,0.00010445761,0.000041615487,0.006506648],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812216,0.0010484342,0.000088971436,0.000248224,0.00028079975,0.00021136813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907845,0.007583506,0.00057580223,0.00022358737,0.0005188765,0.00031370466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004600259,0.0011230716,0.0023595653,0.0013215471,0.00083284103,0.0028047026,0.0023895805,0.003256578,0.0053497627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011231665,0.0015047451,0.001360479,0.0016687091,0.0011325107,0.0042280327,0.001807357,0.002103373,0.0004099028],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000698729,0.000042984273,0.0002821117,0.00002175916,0.000039283088,0.00007188625,0.0000236685,0.98544693,0.00011846186,0.01050878,0.000101314305,0.0032729509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010508282,0.000015574107,0.00005608569,0.0000031805112,0.000009929837,0.0000065258982,0.000003229522,0.99383426,0.000034402437,0.005974751,0.0000455923,0.000006026376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068748062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053857835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068748062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021275806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014099953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024328768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970169623","doi":"10.1037/a0015104","title":"The Impact of Human Intuition in Psychology","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of General Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Intuition; Counterintuitive; Psychology; Epistemology; Behaviorism; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2124151168656351,"score_gpt":0.5842482105776459,"score_spread":0.3718330937120108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970169623","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050501898,0.46208164,0.047216944,0.14005844,0.004200064,0.00006441754,0.00014953206,0.00020855195,0.2955186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8295099,0.12643024,0.014163766,0.017400222,0.003192711,0.00006692157,0.000066877044,0.00006155088,0.009107702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934443,0.0034816111,0.0003168935,0.0006316609,0.0018471408,0.0002783612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755646,0.02080929,0.00093002047,0.0013538831,0.000974345,0.00036783094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007875723,0.00048225402,0.00075913395,0.0013476388,0.001368684,0.0052490346,0.0008970487,0.00296439,0.0031280436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020030014,0.0003267428,0.0005450696,0.0013731321,0.024326092,0.006130856,0.002006412,0.0055530393,0.000659061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007587089,0.00004291692,0.0012418228,0.00065944786,0.00007348507,0.00023346314,0.00075938116,0.0017369433,0.00047774002,0.9175077,0.005838552,0.071352616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007694435,0.000028592001,0.001187311,0.00020885954,0.000010862603,0.00013088743,0.00024028239,0.00036590258,0.00015731527,0.9771311,0.0205087,0.000022581968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013094312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009100192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007875723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031521763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020403313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04165131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970449261","doi":"10.3758/mc.36.6.1066","title":"Different developmental patterns of simple deductive and probabilistic inferential reasoning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Psychology; Categorical variable; Counterexample; Inference; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.12609961536672115,"score_gpt":0.3491721473266582,"score_spread":0.22307253195993704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970449261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9489746,0.0017061734,0.024342448,0.0004658786,0.000046294062,0.00008246672,0.0012425764,0.00025730542,0.022882225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97856104,0.0015715435,0.012828155,0.00008674828,0.000011577749,0.00008273167,0.00095722533,0.00009768787,0.0058033383],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992362,0.0001112497,0.000066532244,0.00020902851,0.00028495735,0.00009204226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926005,0.003576073,0.0008234417,0.0007683212,0.0017730157,0.00045859787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001898526,0.00035596304,0.0003492038,0.0018373776,0.00029229518,0.002368152,0.00087489653,0.00069791905,0.007344579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015285382,0.0007466492,0.0005675542,0.0008384894,0.0012257595,0.0032206376,0.0009346459,0.0016277498,0.0014185923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014406167,0.0008943038,0.22430702,0.0011116336,0.00035649023,0.0015785847,0.012677167,0.007047231,0.14380087,0.18953103,0.0046497444,0.41260532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001050623,0.0007318656,0.70682436,0.00035573688,0.00031277092,0.0039380523,0.0035509747,0.016409906,0.09932352,0.14488015,0.02335818,0.00020945106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029842772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025637578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007344579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070303585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090447906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024570048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971209104","doi":"10.3758/cabn.6.4.277","title":"Affective guidance in the Iowa gambling task","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Iowa gambling task; Task (project management); Psychology; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Affect (linguistics); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Engineering; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.1733290497462471,"score_gpt":0.4386190688870892,"score_spread":0.26529001914084205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971209104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924827,0.00006976517,0.0016213092,0.00014643007,0.00003586107,0.000043775162,0.00014577352,0.00004834405,0.0054059546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940948,0.00009845202,0.0023806156,0.000090246656,0.000016344948,0.00005906167,0.00022195013,0.00004553554,0.0029929997],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993637,0.00026015873,0.000033717857,0.00008555903,0.00020124033,0.000055604927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800295,0.0009857536,0.0003859162,0.00019493673,0.00014075382,0.0002896502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001058691,0.00054218806,0.00050390227,0.00023907633,0.00016728898,0.0011739463,0.0004696715,0.0010988514,0.0032002556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009318632,0.00030345444,0.00012568603,0.0002797329,0.00028860013,0.00061439816,0.00055876904,0.0011521379,0.0004808889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.037217863,0.009306343,0.14912213,0.00050791557,0.0004327288,0.00050626835,0.0016935733,0.019997807,0.5549499,0.014919814,0.008325089,0.20302065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001803536,0.0053267293,0.8360055,0.0001064071,0.00028973672,0.0003008299,0.0003493844,0.109750696,0.020307183,0.021717899,0.003898858,0.00014308526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030921192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003669065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032002556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003613123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005320094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010705948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973674528","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2013.08.001","title":"Human economic choice as costly information processing","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Minnesota; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Stylized fact; Ambiguity; Certainty; Computer science; Task (project management); Artificial neural network; Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Cognitive psychology; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Machine learning","score_opus":0.06033256151471374,"score_gpt":0.3782801113689977,"score_spread":0.317947549854284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973674528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.541494,0.0031803658,0.33355653,0.015239303,0.00040461795,0.00017854982,0.0004567435,0.00019528372,0.105294585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757018,0.0006973624,0.019202713,0.0003461324,0.00013979532,0.000039120907,0.000047873687,0.000021088834,0.0038040977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998599,0.00074960216,0.00005317486,0.0001329608,0.00035828992,0.00010691487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783895,0.018085275,0.0011542033,0.0011728032,0.00070175686,0.00049644266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002421911,0.00031319933,0.0005111256,0.00081306824,0.0004181295,0.003144145,0.0005974843,0.0014363396,0.0058719567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018302929,0.0004243418,0.00046454393,0.00085098605,0.0019625672,0.0043165297,0.0008288027,0.0010663957,0.000286669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016935306,0.00015144213,0.0024813304,0.00019597843,0.00010346206,0.00028608012,0.00038988533,0.041685432,0.0018362997,0.91681033,0.0024032125,0.03348714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023711189,0.000025453683,0.0012490506,0.000016162843,0.00002265608,0.00007556673,0.000054850963,0.038969148,0.00023853728,0.9585403,0.0007692206,0.000015336598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008876045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006733686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058719567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009185598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093497813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019643664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974084640","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.09.003","title":"The preference‐signaling effect of search","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Set (abstract data type); Choice set; Sight; Normative; Contrast (vision); Consumer choice; Economics; Psychology; Microeconomics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Econometrics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.20292431059418853,"score_gpt":0.4811094195206591,"score_spread":0.2781851089264706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974084640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98127687,0.00029040434,0.004684723,0.0003892894,0.0000174669,0.000019366482,0.000060934723,0.000036532165,0.013224572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881303,0.00007397876,0.0007217517,0.000048706483,0.0000071144304,0.000005259277,0.000015507914,0.0000054198013,0.00030923384],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908984,0.00036708932,0.00006763448,0.00014504485,0.00025246505,0.000077919896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98398095,0.0115445,0.002122424,0.0014137853,0.00050512666,0.00043319893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012518758,0.0002827734,0.0003484456,0.00044217694,0.0002657079,0.0010746,0.00037665656,0.00067785993,0.006731277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013328132,0.00027552096,0.00025354384,0.0003459835,0.001100679,0.0015410981,0.00084631727,0.0011975083,0.00024286786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012935055,0.002323969,0.10202899,0.0013074757,0.00040921362,0.0008077494,0.001834367,0.020103732,0.5055966,0.15927047,0.0018782528,0.19150414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083721057,0.0049701557,0.4841859,0.00024502535,0.0011595906,0.0017101115,0.0019025501,0.11410979,0.12030675,0.26419675,0.005964767,0.00041138273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008151248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088696665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006731277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067784317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039583718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022518337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975122737","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000092","title":"Deductive updating is not Bayesian.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Counterexample; Deductive reasoning; Probabilistic argumentation; Frequentist probability; Inference; Frequentist inference; Mathematics; Statistical inference; Bayesian probability; Bayesian inference; Psychology; Statistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.20887245434336033,"score_gpt":0.4685886036484083,"score_spread":0.259716149305048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975122737","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37147784,0.0061790356,0.46643367,0.024143316,0.0009972894,0.0003573417,0.00088943867,0.0012403983,0.12828173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96424806,0.0010233211,0.029582229,0.0014581003,0.00032163365,0.00008125777,0.00033912552,0.000086700624,0.0028595685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927927,0.0022568644,0.0005478673,0.0017843709,0.0023171508,0.00030102013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91936195,0.04745679,0.011703923,0.014187601,0.0059916284,0.001298133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0149573395,0.00042777616,0.00085481134,0.0013202111,0.0007881998,0.0032463013,0.0011800268,0.0016310518,0.007584617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15364696,0.00069225533,0.0008851671,0.001081893,0.0033343437,0.011474015,0.0013455887,0.002947648,0.0011268852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009721227,0.00039455353,0.037106898,0.0009546948,0.00085495005,0.0002631078,0.0022688785,0.006758685,0.0033914528,0.5930983,0.0076555996,0.34628084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011633455,0.00012357287,0.013646029,0.00011289282,0.00015548678,0.00042177064,0.0002388262,0.013613989,0.0011943087,0.96119153,0.009126112,0.00005912936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017126341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001436157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0149573395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012945813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095288735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07910293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975384768","doi":"10.1126/science.1160769","title":"Automatic Mental Associations Predict Future Choices of Undecided Decision-Makers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":232,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscious mind; Categorization; Psychology; Task (project management); Social psychology; Control (management); Cognitive psychology; Information processing; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08991233316250512,"score_gpt":0.3960210399360344,"score_spread":0.30610870677352925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975384768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993957,0.00001629694,0.00019859476,0.000020521495,0.0000027465205,0.0000039611878,0.000011112181,0.000002217873,0.00034879404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999338,0.000020251782,0.0004257953,0.000013774161,0.000002774996,0.0000029708508,0.000029630202,0.0000012509867,0.00016561286],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995803,0.00015047003,0.00003967041,0.000068010646,0.00009133016,0.00007029397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901715,0.003652164,0.0036104585,0.0008571867,0.0007043001,0.0010043719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015388972,0.00021210649,0.00016933857,0.00056434114,0.00022190924,0.0011531266,0.00017585202,0.0004289737,0.0024374675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0132451765,0.00017102959,0.00019693568,0.00020055505,0.0005894947,0.0005131921,0.00041509056,0.00084609515,0.0002158216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008514073,0.00072289264,0.9682511,0.000036725713,0.0000889911,0.00025825834,0.0011988741,0.0009355943,0.010298321,0.0010999708,0.00017807093,0.016079724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000417039,0.00051359314,0.98443013,0.000015402806,0.00003995035,0.00030739227,0.00080120144,0.006194466,0.0032215032,0.0040295436,0.0003640042,0.00004113679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008741407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012107048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024374675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020250192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018613647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008154154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975900334","doi":"10.1098/rsif.2013.0969","title":"Optimal indolence: a normative microscopic approach to work and leisure","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Normative; Lever; Work (physics); Normative model of decision-making; Function (biology); Leisure time; Control (management); Economics; Psychology; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Medicine; Physics; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Biology; Physical activity; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.04766132528593044,"score_gpt":0.3407803298570015,"score_spread":0.2931190045710711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975900334","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085675746,0.0004897668,0.81331134,0.006355913,0.00012999948,0.00007125707,0.00018942071,0.00012621244,0.093650304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94698405,0.00030141673,0.040997125,0.00041890412,0.00012261649,0.00018407445,0.000038049828,0.000057543184,0.010896278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992324,0.00030102604,0.000024766863,0.00012273957,0.00023406645,0.00008496953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866664,0.00062039663,0.0001899598,0.00022252754,0.00015887576,0.00014149447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014536054,0.00037778105,0.00046482918,0.00059203274,0.0006775958,0.001815859,0.0017137342,0.0012097745,0.0051247184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041953833,0.000327893,0.00051082805,0.00033085915,0.004688318,0.0035947482,0.0014101604,0.0012495023,0.00035630816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000137485285,0.000025114303,0.00024420314,0.0000189034,0.0000046781074,0.000028567656,0.00007673998,0.01980504,0.0006806094,0.9763326,0.00031610852,0.0024536182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009810718,0.000019395144,0.00034575007,0.000008774769,0.000004072047,0.000029164386,0.00004193536,0.08527783,0.00020742125,0.91251403,0.0015297107,0.000012149354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00201092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020177232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051247184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019893784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011489305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017143905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977123702","doi":"10.1037/a0017188","title":"Decision-tree models of categorization response times, choice proportions, and typicality judgments.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Categorization; Decision tree; Psychology; Decision tree model; Tree (set theory); Statistics; Decision tree learning; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Mathematics; Machine learning; Computer science","score_opus":0.23097762735129052,"score_gpt":0.4898133821524445,"score_spread":0.258835754801154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977123702","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061816365,0.0011265347,0.92785347,0.0008323444,0.00014865649,0.00026427343,0.00088440045,0.0004954744,0.0065784147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.767536,0.0016396513,0.21776752,0.00044837134,0.0001647175,0.0012923087,0.0018152645,0.00019884817,0.00913726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.996642,0.0016943952,0.00014855643,0.0006363391,0.000553969,0.00032478015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806698,0.014592682,0.001811776,0.0012205706,0.0011458854,0.00055929145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008739689,0.0018726812,0.0016576097,0.0024458612,0.00072238746,0.0029629853,0.003860555,0.0023487983,0.008004137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030935822,0.0009855931,0.0035952504,0.002371417,0.0014455086,0.004128516,0.0011539056,0.0023369463,0.0026522912],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012731296,0.0005557785,0.020427857,0.00049753377,0.00069756585,0.00033496032,0.0017736028,0.40805164,0.002361234,0.4528305,0.007202395,0.10399382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005034054,0.00007921725,0.0022081514,0.00002591304,0.000097276505,0.00016020909,0.00004336254,0.7696468,0.0002580388,0.22511622,0.0022623136,0.000052061456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049097533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038351787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008739689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002648137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001040888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04622048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979132471","doi":"10.4018/ijabe.2014040103","title":"B is for Bias","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Rationality; Order (exchange); Bounded rationality; Rational agent; Behavioral economics; Economics; Ecological rationality; Rational expectations; Positive economics; Psychology; Computer science; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Neoclassical economics; Econometrics; Finance","score_opus":0.25516198297692766,"score_gpt":0.4432321040956254,"score_spread":0.18807012111869775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979132471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009654086,0.01577099,0.041660942,0.24566746,0.022238428,0.00019293207,0.0019381848,0.001226809,0.6616501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40207523,0.01377996,0.03203592,0.19197495,0.02034626,0.0007748424,0.0019211518,0.0022107714,0.33488092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99101454,0.0025042363,0.00057226344,0.002614138,0.0023542428,0.0009405442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826826,0.004955208,0.0016198287,0.0055699646,0.0040801424,0.0010921858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007914032,0.0010529647,0.0011761546,0.002023401,0.0044713547,0.009242578,0.002213878,0.006095103,0.107420735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038400304,0.0004698813,0.0010564533,0.0016257123,0.008841583,0.012860393,0.005280244,0.0074832547,0.039690223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012700004,0.00003835685,0.0016758827,0.00021812716,0.00005871092,0.0002310679,0.0009204649,0.00013083566,0.00040156546,0.7829293,0.15422203,0.059046656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036732443,0.000028349057,0.0008399897,0.00038235367,0.000034076147,0.00077543384,0.0004280466,0.00029931965,0.00050232466,0.43620467,0.56043375,0.000034945504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035593826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025133814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107420735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036904467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033168353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3593582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979248804","doi":"10.1002/bdm.626","title":"How do we evaluate future gambles? Experimental evidence on path dependency in risky intertemporal choice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Management and Science University; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Lottery; Discounting; Econometrics; Path (computing); Economics; Time preference; Intertemporal choice; Choice set; Prospect theory; Expected utility hypothesis; Value (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Statistics","score_opus":0.26264413727393615,"score_gpt":0.47354757966716654,"score_spread":0.2109034423932304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979248804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99192446,0.00010931467,0.003829486,0.00013626284,0.000010545327,0.00008057706,0.000041972286,0.000018795887,0.0038485224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934087,0.0001383887,0.0055806246,0.000099304765,0.000009954147,0.00011504063,0.000057940248,0.000019335173,0.00057066535],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99384695,0.0040014023,0.0003677596,0.0006618702,0.0009883873,0.00013352031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81032175,0.16088445,0.013510919,0.012324213,0.0015082131,0.0014504489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012545635,0.00041664043,0.00057643757,0.000421272,0.00034192912,0.0013356558,0.00085581915,0.0012283484,0.004574116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08895485,0.0007563625,0.0003953682,0.00036471678,0.0013589537,0.0027483879,0.0011840374,0.0022804032,0.00045194433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.046242338,0.026924506,0.23069547,0.0023109044,0.0013762689,0.0014041336,0.017991576,0.051782276,0.2629173,0.100401744,0.0031362849,0.25481716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004529784,0.026167138,0.54949254,0.0004380896,0.0006659555,0.0016708495,0.0015876658,0.16142868,0.09320212,0.14967829,0.010508352,0.0006305248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045639073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031637689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012545635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043038602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034601553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06634843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979776966","doi":"10.3758/mc.38.6.667","title":"Probability matching and strategy availability","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Deliberation; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.16883872913670897,"score_gpt":0.3793368715094194,"score_spread":0.21049814237271045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979776966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9436861,0.0010474136,0.033342402,0.0017937386,0.000054437365,0.00003777504,0.00013826393,0.00008081664,0.019818975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974898,0.000099720615,0.0011006736,0.000052801253,0.000030946318,0.00000815594,0.000035566383,0.0000098902265,0.001172525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844533,0.0006804595,0.00012872602,0.0002851622,0.00023044455,0.00022980613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94135684,0.04749712,0.00439271,0.0034943253,0.0013145513,0.00194449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049308,0.00024025726,0.0009439083,0.0010829835,0.0004558364,0.0030084634,0.00077744346,0.0017058784,0.016146697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062383786,0.0005413293,0.0005452629,0.0008611759,0.0009898631,0.00511208,0.0013819528,0.001541044,0.0009072609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005453556,0.002471207,0.2257966,0.0004610447,0.0010277854,0.0011978679,0.0013906362,0.04971813,0.012384131,0.47933072,0.003950364,0.21681799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021834845,0.00035596086,0.095802665,0.00003021091,0.00019558839,0.0006502584,0.00032137794,0.08139249,0.0011501953,0.8184587,0.0013765701,0.000047675836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011397669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086946104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016146697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006935638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060468516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054016054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980816362","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00178.x","title":"Rationality Disputes – Psychology and Epistemology","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Epistemology; Ecological rationality; Psychology; Bridge (graph theory); Convergence (economics); Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.32920415922335594,"score_gpt":0.44124108997185263,"score_spread":0.11203693074849669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980816362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108785726,0.049813908,0.06369019,0.31450212,0.0024754964,0.00007595472,0.000111468544,0.00012251873,0.4604226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816025,0.0049323314,0.003404018,0.005912082,0.0011161037,0.000049700135,0.000035769885,0.000035603698,0.00291179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97417825,0.018545711,0.00071580446,0.0016945314,0.0038412693,0.0010243575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9224783,0.06421995,0.0037899322,0.0040979055,0.0040333266,0.001380565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029353393,0.00047054936,0.0011171848,0.004599017,0.0053368937,0.014070188,0.002593318,0.009245614,0.0051669246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047962762,0.00060351344,0.00085610256,0.002583643,0.09226179,0.015625773,0.006457922,0.0087726,0.0004940293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072360713,0.000011171422,0.000117530406,0.000028708444,0.0000069922835,0.000038267466,0.0011233664,0.00023078632,0.000025969257,0.9955481,0.0009602946,0.0019016281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000792896,0.0000024273277,0.00007184931,0.000057435835,0.0000017343524,0.00002130544,0.00060493674,0.00023312058,0.00002412322,0.9929174,0.0060531246,0.0000044978424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017425574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007254746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029353393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070192297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004327397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15523744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981262337","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0188-x","title":"Variable-population extensions of social aggregation theorems","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Variable (mathematics); Extension (predicate logic); Population; Utilitarianism; Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Contrast (vision); Econometrics; Economics; Social policy; Public finance; Ex-ante; Random variable; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Sociology; Political science; Demography; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.04997353019053637,"score_gpt":0.3574628823402215,"score_spread":0.30748935214968515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981262337","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05563546,0.00093486084,0.90910447,0.0029250842,0.00017327913,0.00007167519,0.00027678677,0.00016847295,0.030709947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.864479,0.0021191048,0.110143885,0.0010237768,0.0008336418,0.00047134954,0.0003976125,0.00016730334,0.020364301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997212,0.0019224428,0.00007455662,0.00024760913,0.00032055387,0.00022281923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98361105,0.0128418505,0.00094881735,0.0012436674,0.0009070902,0.00044752753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078010336,0.0009848498,0.0015542398,0.0020351307,0.0010952208,0.0027084772,0.0026319267,0.0016623574,0.0070708254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022324786,0.0004708271,0.0020237225,0.0019530207,0.002671114,0.0057945275,0.0029607518,0.0027623984,0.0005178062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006595325,0.000019987874,0.00022839618,0.000023530525,0.000022922943,0.000029715711,0.00009847283,0.014704342,0.000055994115,0.9808456,0.0011316986,0.0028328148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008102694,0.0000042001716,0.00010710586,0.000007518721,0.000006728095,0.000014910739,0.000022338718,0.07711623,0.0000209069,0.9221234,0.0005643383,0.000004260143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023422719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001790363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078010336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018347383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009798253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04125637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981308105","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.020","title":"Theory-informed design of values clarification methods: A cognitive psychological perspective on patient health-related decision making","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"PsycINFO; Management science; Decision theory; Process (computing); Decision field theory; Psychology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Empirical research; Computer science; MEDLINE; Decision engineering; Decision support system; Artificial intelligence; Business decision mapping; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.44008208007943994,"score_gpt":0.6067197964989756,"score_spread":0.16663771641953562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981308105","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040039322,0.77749103,0.18996291,0.015259605,0.0012554405,0.0012205233,0.00013883239,0.00012551436,0.010542214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1192992,0.49111766,0.3778942,0.0058874,0.0009316357,0.0028930542,0.00022245318,0.00008323415,0.0016712144],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97168845,0.022669528,0.0011807707,0.00093911134,0.0032339345,0.00028803712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8838716,0.10851453,0.0028829293,0.0015712018,0.002687492,0.00047223974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033568196,0.0013103088,0.0028634926,0.0029018468,0.0006567552,0.0036950167,0.0040201712,0.003147134,0.005226062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07461108,0.0006549703,0.00228578,0.002506134,0.0038014557,0.0033252775,0.0017564596,0.004175418,0.00088106876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001613383,0.00026678896,0.000490817,0.019551596,0.00041109402,0.000051009323,0.00073156034,0.003883143,0.00018005731,0.05519686,0.0038940033,0.91518176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011340044,0.0010458946,0.003755341,0.07832519,0.0023463126,0.0006939776,0.0025027,0.019409718,0.0026786432,0.6084515,0.2793866,0.00027011082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017208715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024976744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033568196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030301935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009768435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17752767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981901481","doi":"10.1037/a0027855","title":"Beyond gains and losses: The effect of need on risky choice in framed decisions.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre","keywords":"Framing (construction); Framing effect; Normative; Psychology; Perception; Risk perception; Social psychology; Prospect theory; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.16571237882096101,"score_gpt":0.48438847261860085,"score_spread":0.31867609379763984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981901481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97156274,0.00029192152,0.0062689623,0.00087376026,0.00004348711,0.00005264611,0.000053327378,0.000018256338,0.020834893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973099,0.00007257236,0.0020220336,0.00011314825,0.000015165409,0.000029206289,0.000023579994,0.000007138386,0.0004071929],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951382,0.003156263,0.00014564677,0.00037029615,0.0009825558,0.00020696121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9509175,0.039089523,0.0052304342,0.0017026626,0.0012752726,0.0017846243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007942167,0.00049883727,0.000364326,0.0007633425,0.00061206234,0.0022479177,0.0003683385,0.0010835929,0.0041305656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044150814,0.0002660793,0.00051856856,0.00030133716,0.0017715236,0.0022986925,0.0015651388,0.0019561322,0.00020600916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012206012,0.0062494418,0.50302655,0.0009662277,0.00094607455,0.0015157453,0.043833554,0.0095417425,0.05663212,0.124089755,0.004046922,0.23694588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047420088,0.003667137,0.70908767,0.00027159535,0.00074485247,0.0006339,0.008939407,0.038118225,0.0075705103,0.22373356,0.006471635,0.00028736208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013580123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019170638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007942167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010483514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044715812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042002738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982834043","doi":"10.1177/154193121005400412","title":"Mapping Biases to the Components of Rationalistic and Naturalistic Decision Making","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Hindsight bias; Heuristics; Representativeness heuristic; Overconfidence effect; Rule of thumb; Framing (construction); Debiasing; Computer science; Confirmation bias; Cognitive bias; Framing effect; Anchoring; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Management science; Social psychology; Cognition; Economics","score_opus":0.0847403192816197,"score_gpt":0.34436558826331587,"score_spread":0.2596252689816962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982834043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5209205,0.0055229077,0.36320853,0.006160244,0.0002122144,0.001239051,0.00033520642,0.00024116352,0.102160126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94093966,0.0010611633,0.056608196,0.00029155298,0.00004656207,0.00039383292,0.00006445235,0.000032565105,0.0005619536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93126607,0.040839784,0.0035285922,0.0033191598,0.019447986,0.0015983604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7203108,0.21961778,0.03191367,0.014013288,0.012782572,0.0013617752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053893212,0.0009128255,0.0008055258,0.0062649045,0.0013043128,0.008885723,0.0011960549,0.0012824343,0.0037993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23596737,0.0010844562,0.0013158026,0.004854484,0.010884361,0.0075688264,0.004531971,0.0022823666,0.00033640186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006142982,0.00036294336,0.14237213,0.0023954078,0.0009805791,0.0002881082,0.014635957,0.01696478,0.0016674296,0.57137173,0.0013188076,0.24702784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009258657,0.00021370561,0.07568299,0.00080145954,0.00032790375,0.0003045338,0.0053270417,0.02440354,0.0026700075,0.88258487,0.0074030804,0.00018840778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031952383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031943985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053893212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057647927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005255241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2850179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983201084","doi":"10.5539/res.v6n1p34","title":"Pre-Counterfactuals and Anticipated Emotions: Factors Affecting the First Bid in Name-Your-Own-Price Auctions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ajou University","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Counterfactual conditional; Disappointment; Regret; Common value auction; Economics; Psychology; Unique bid auction; Microeconomics; Positive economics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.2454847705496675,"score_gpt":0.44836264643387225,"score_spread":0.20287787588420475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983201084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957574,0.0003279745,0.001355975,0.000060626327,0.000011739954,0.000012673766,0.000010528687,0.0000051752227,0.0024578404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983748,0.00024000452,0.0009499141,0.000045619257,0.000013553436,0.000013607987,0.000029583416,0.0000053070703,0.00032756678],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784803,0.0012700818,0.0001346819,0.00016040797,0.000463297,0.00012344995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98084867,0.012140241,0.0049858433,0.0007410541,0.0008239679,0.00046024148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031813749,0.0003467124,0.00027793422,0.00027365278,0.00023174586,0.001976407,0.00025036404,0.00056484994,0.0012492304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020127188,0.00018302246,0.00033015432,0.00022537724,0.0006176923,0.00087311724,0.00046976798,0.0011011537,0.00023644175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012022008,0.005533454,0.6430469,0.0010047137,0.00091747975,0.0011655411,0.009415248,0.008849149,0.10653883,0.012308628,0.00084097416,0.19835703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007365454,0.0011711111,0.97753954,0.00006845,0.00011347616,0.00040398925,0.00195982,0.004195577,0.0058818976,0.007531321,0.000978367,0.00008277791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003994872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051225105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031813749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039924143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026018222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016824901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984452204","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.04.007","title":"What should we expect from a dual‐process theory of preference construction in choice?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Dual (grammatical number); Process (computing); Dual process theory (moral psychology); Criticism; Associative property; Elaboration; Psychology; Cognition; Revealed preference; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2963841047127266,"score_gpt":0.4644670012000779,"score_spread":0.1680828964873513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984452204","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22238445,0.004565477,0.4815249,0.14519058,0.0013926004,0.00016577228,0.00042013865,0.0002865239,0.1440695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95928514,0.0015544507,0.029633813,0.004502446,0.0004855889,0.00018291843,0.00008088157,0.000059261136,0.0042156447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980021,0.0010452713,0.000069394315,0.00026721827,0.00042516954,0.00019081462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98688567,0.00994427,0.00071070256,0.0007558307,0.0012542342,0.00044933872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071223294,0.0004867945,0.0011154148,0.0010633589,0.00075607246,0.003585864,0.0015748251,0.0033807552,0.0074709686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015510863,0.0003555586,0.001283718,0.00090285693,0.006362217,0.010123509,0.0017442994,0.0036545713,0.0011787831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009113865,0.00011045671,0.001056057,0.00011631947,0.000039888877,0.00007157315,0.0004134561,0.0016383663,0.0002534816,0.9870947,0.0011487384,0.00796589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002870983,0.000027538605,0.00045374525,0.000016375398,0.000012225158,0.000023818042,0.00009182775,0.004430255,0.00012024296,0.99362236,0.00116361,0.000009451782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010824647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005667312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074709686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015612064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007980536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037666917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987353489","doi":"10.1007/s10584-008-9458-1","title":"Improving the way we think about projecting future energy use and emissions of carbon dioxide","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Climatic Change","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Overconfidence effect; Futures contract; Scenario planning; Relevance (law); Variety (cybernetics); Probabilistic logic; Futures studies; Task (project management); Scenario analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Energy (signal processing); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Psychology; Economics; Business; Marketing; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.23344313284463408,"score_gpt":0.35783320498038584,"score_spread":0.12439007213575176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987353489","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2184262,0.010774698,0.43875685,0.27580506,0.002022417,0.00018799561,0.0012773367,0.0007339648,0.052015558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7794037,0.0078035523,0.20093115,0.008230548,0.00044927906,0.00012581772,0.0007029968,0.0001471333,0.0022058422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99002904,0.0072630723,0.0003764013,0.00059415813,0.0012076432,0.0005298105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98329043,0.009871238,0.0017740518,0.0009999899,0.0028599063,0.0012043533],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018825162,0.0014308671,0.001073205,0.0016202534,0.0016616825,0.009244885,0.0021300935,0.005217952,0.0050447346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040143967,0.00063282443,0.0013924482,0.0018063629,0.0038165364,0.011564666,0.0027198326,0.006719694,0.0008743581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056901964,0.0011062876,0.064777546,0.00235723,0.0022802933,0.00027523626,0.0048941183,0.22630563,0.007316318,0.34178647,0.041774407,0.30655754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073631156,0.00015719685,0.017572619,0.0007914144,0.00039887676,0.00010369062,0.0062590153,0.097995915,0.00518616,0.8343839,0.036817223,0.0002604565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016594423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020278336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9811748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032023145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058924817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099558115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987409935","doi":"10.1006/jmps.2001.1374","title":"A Simple Axiomatization of Binary Rank-Dependent Utility of Gains (Losses)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Binary number; Simple (philosophy); Partition (number theory); Mathematics; Rank (graph theory); Representation (politics); Applied mathematics; Combinatorics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.28651160125907393,"score_gpt":0.4756119854686987,"score_spread":0.18910038420962477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987409935","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020225218,0.0005076116,0.89914215,0.0055976035,0.00046481297,0.00012310364,0.0012675575,0.00030405444,0.07236787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6299067,0.0007790895,0.34399527,0.001761117,0.00048571537,0.0003863506,0.00077397714,0.00012718118,0.021784676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977102,0.000727975,0.00024571872,0.0004921759,0.0005722571,0.0002516677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725753,0.0012918294,0.00021319932,0.0005739764,0.00053644174,0.00012710731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030341446,0.00062635116,0.0005536334,0.0010808515,0.0010970901,0.0034280529,0.0015581753,0.0022217603,0.0106761055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068589337,0.00059042027,0.0012505519,0.0014892848,0.0036044058,0.0072027775,0.0021348891,0.0035034602,0.0016683708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003775464,0.00000644829,0.00004946865,0.0000134971,0.0000034613604,0.000015276797,0.00002881793,0.00036139702,0.00016059485,0.99569196,0.00076710235,0.002898286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008644529,0.0000083399555,0.00008356393,0.0000103305965,0.0000064320498,0.000081405444,0.000013903513,0.0031477953,0.0002062336,0.99141747,0.0050072963,0.000008538685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001455286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014109141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0106761055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010682808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011439404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035715163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987788491","doi":"10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01086.x","title":"RISK AVERSION AND EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY: AN EXPERIMENT WITH LARGE AND SMALL STAKES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the European Economic Association","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Risk aversion (psychology); Economics; Econometrics; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Subjective expected utility; Constant (computer programming); Set (abstract data type); Sample (material); Mathematical economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.062186598748908965,"score_gpt":0.312326934608013,"score_spread":0.250140335859104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987788491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98536927,0.000067904766,0.009599556,0.00062951824,0.000056466066,0.00021923585,0.0002628568,0.000053162097,0.0037421193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98581576,0.000079497964,0.011311694,0.00029877413,0.00003942294,0.0005904737,0.00029215103,0.000027895368,0.0015443112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932666,0.0045270296,0.00032684568,0.00074583694,0.00088948745,0.000244267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8383578,0.14271972,0.005299306,0.01076662,0.0011511395,0.0017054196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015463704,0.00092398364,0.001322824,0.0005669227,0.00073082745,0.0022600677,0.0018823462,0.0023619214,0.0065245638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065183766,0.00054862536,0.0009419704,0.00071494863,0.0024006343,0.0029741614,0.0018509801,0.004490008,0.0006611856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05687799,0.13243984,0.08110488,0.0020428281,0.002180773,0.0021891685,0.012830243,0.19867502,0.06955975,0.28951094,0.016179437,0.13640915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014813709,0.0394316,0.05566085,0.0002640751,0.0005550737,0.0006742898,0.002492417,0.5806064,0.024897542,0.26594877,0.014177262,0.00047811164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074565795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046815892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015463704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007258149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056588295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08178091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988958162","doi":"10.3758/s13423-012-0249-3","title":"Reasoning with base rates is routine, relatively effortless, and context dependent","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Base (topology); Personality; Context (archaeology); Neglect; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.10304304513461295,"score_gpt":0.39120735380690946,"score_spread":0.28816430867229653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988958162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44663057,0.033251066,0.44560376,0.0053265216,0.00075808447,0.00033132112,0.0012829456,0.0011895054,0.06562627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9071226,0.019320546,0.06622013,0.0007715741,0.0007026086,0.000102607875,0.0008511892,0.00019072463,0.004718146],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582565,0.0009954296,0.00036292628,0.0011379307,0.0014808669,0.00019730568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95252967,0.031459164,0.0063489918,0.0062966524,0.0026963972,0.0006691284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055720382,0.000820645,0.0011971159,0.0010806528,0.00035230073,0.0049132,0.0017022413,0.0012334937,0.0035390346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052188836,0.00070911576,0.0008420444,0.0012207888,0.0016346703,0.0050343554,0.0008691802,0.002209009,0.0018775522],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010752493,0.0004733071,0.031503715,0.0020285205,0.0010949525,0.0004930259,0.00070276926,0.012878047,0.016424213,0.0669718,0.0069875713,0.85936683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002878313,0.0007009489,0.11151733,0.0007746043,0.00090121455,0.0024796536,0.0005766101,0.055622425,0.020890167,0.7769909,0.028962227,0.000296018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017830685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012144552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055720382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007625983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011325415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02946812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989108037","doi":"10.1016/j.jmp.2005.11.004","title":"Modelling intransitive preferences: A random-effects approach","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Council","keywords":"Transitive relation; Pairwise comparison; Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Replication (statistics); Computer science; Econometrics; Invariant (physics); Mathematics; Cognitive psychology; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Statistics","score_opus":0.22193040817320334,"score_gpt":0.44617215646203207,"score_spread":0.22424174828882873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989108037","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12983274,0.00015588936,0.8662264,0.00041176184,0.00008100038,0.00015482659,0.00033010636,0.0002724297,0.002534802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8657472,0.00028710492,0.12486305,0.0002523629,0.0001182941,0.00037730523,0.0003102976,0.00019640739,0.007848074],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962811,0.0024311857,0.000120989505,0.0006021401,0.00023445772,0.00033014844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9667643,0.028094027,0.0012360638,0.0026839466,0.000731075,0.00049052294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008773049,0.0009856533,0.0026269772,0.0010651067,0.0005166427,0.0022611173,0.0037644785,0.0025057897,0.009706479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026712786,0.0015131991,0.0032724675,0.0012036179,0.0013225029,0.0038037645,0.0014641302,0.003829683,0.0011074439],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012129669,0.00088490796,0.004751995,0.0002067777,0.0008833582,0.00054193486,0.0004513926,0.80273336,0.002089078,0.16599464,0.0012330158,0.019016575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008057377,0.000065472545,0.00028804102,0.000007010663,0.00008295461,0.000040401526,0.000015568809,0.9615237,0.000191856,0.03750589,0.00017150804,0.000026934093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051353974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00619225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009706479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009062466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008084926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04639685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989305447","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.10.008","title":"Probability assessment with response times and confidence in perception and knowledge","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Psychologica","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Confidence interval; Statistics; Mathematics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.26175330820840575,"score_gpt":0.45149192595311716,"score_spread":0.1897386177447114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989305447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761776,0.00017919598,0.019303206,0.00012257045,0.000043817396,0.00009978858,0.00017580729,0.00013862242,0.0037594582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99549854,0.00004467924,0.003391892,0.000033365377,0.00002656697,0.000070338865,0.0001434167,0.000033155993,0.0007581377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900051,0.005033884,0.0007906571,0.0016004336,0.0020594576,0.0005106405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.60788935,0.34589133,0.023427477,0.011635387,0.006840339,0.004316072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013611589,0.0006765437,0.0006702365,0.0014693589,0.00029543697,0.0028802552,0.0009747527,0.0023034776,0.008163801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25042716,0.0005624287,0.0011237095,0.0012192763,0.00091966544,0.0038581227,0.0014173742,0.002169408,0.0014679079],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019011717,0.0030268652,0.8402109,0.0002982107,0.0008863682,0.00042972964,0.0026949586,0.020356469,0.011392242,0.004333798,0.0009807152,0.09637813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030593682,0.004255984,0.80470943,0.00009609805,0.0005366855,0.0013109748,0.0007521818,0.15515088,0.011186915,0.020525625,0.0009250614,0.00024420387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012411292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005538603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013611589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046618195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005586966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07198578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989563657","doi":"10.1007/s13209-011-0044-9","title":"Revealed preference and choice under uncertainty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SERIEs","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Rationalizability; Transitive relation; Preference; Mathematical economics; Dominance (genetics); Preference theory; Property (philosophy); Class (philosophy); Economics; Revealed preference; Stochastic dominance; Econometrics; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Microeconomics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.40996987268490964,"score_gpt":0.38680057717732247,"score_spread":0.023169295507587173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989563657","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17838947,0.0036247831,0.75855535,0.00801343,0.00020031905,0.00013266367,0.00022827374,0.000081446,0.050774243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712919,0.0013162855,0.024579272,0.0002123334,0.00012304101,0.000102414655,0.000048608486,0.000008683579,0.002317468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99338174,0.0046370644,0.00019509581,0.00050866447,0.00091672,0.00036078173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98738444,0.009617065,0.0012218823,0.0008875516,0.00058118027,0.0003078159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074492297,0.0005938794,0.0009121165,0.0008028146,0.0006082997,0.0028584893,0.0008630284,0.0014254352,0.0026563003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015129115,0.0002544682,0.0009419574,0.0012191156,0.004109289,0.003676105,0.0010769166,0.0016290561,0.00019885578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002886478,0.000012125593,0.00027249914,0.00004108683,0.00002836031,0.000045202672,0.000111893154,0.011523407,0.00017662373,0.98397475,0.0002137928,0.0035714754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017363169,0.000024058101,0.00014326324,0.000013119026,0.000007771358,0.000016297507,0.000035788566,0.026820758,0.00010259763,0.97199035,0.0008206769,0.000007938583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000993501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008285157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074492297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002136018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011727381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03939575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989779703","doi":"10.3758/s13420-011-0015-9","title":"The criterion-calibration model of cue interaction in contingency judgments","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learning & Behavior","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reciprocal; Contingency; Calibration; Social psychology; Class (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.27009798046754313,"score_gpt":0.40913906244095133,"score_spread":0.1390410819734082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989779703","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3125562,0.0006126494,0.6439906,0.0027566531,0.00013140662,0.00018864572,0.00026227205,0.00047815498,0.039023537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97543925,0.000121663536,0.020512627,0.00012709414,0.00003195419,0.00007842015,0.000056179153,0.000066894114,0.0035658663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953675,0.002492895,0.0001238013,0.000679599,0.0008853668,0.0004507953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97759414,0.017286897,0.001105981,0.0016615666,0.0017235659,0.0006279238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007777059,0.0007223643,0.0014412126,0.0013408081,0.00088201906,0.003359558,0.0022090636,0.0026183536,0.010099354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05173375,0.0009863572,0.0011967535,0.0012889053,0.0022725468,0.005086377,0.0016670115,0.0027603107,0.00115929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010974956,0.0007351224,0.012747373,0.0002152171,0.0003802421,0.00031629766,0.0010082747,0.2386204,0.005424168,0.66400594,0.0032748831,0.07217462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006006525,0.000107487336,0.00562689,0.000022168915,0.000056454282,0.00011204417,0.00008104584,0.59178376,0.0007568136,0.40081307,0.0005181883,0.0000619373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053128097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033971258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010099354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017027671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002189165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04112953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991011913","doi":"10.1002/bdm.414","title":"A domain‐specific risk‐attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1865,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Risk perception; Scale (ratio); Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Social psychology; Sample (material); Perception; Actuarial science; Risk aversion (psychology); Construct (python library); Expected utility hypothesis; Business; Economics; Computer science; Financial economics","score_opus":0.11703020244390432,"score_gpt":0.38294582481598927,"score_spread":0.26591562237208494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991011913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98902017,0.00017876997,0.002900486,0.00020486658,0.000033623015,0.00043384405,0.00084052264,0.000053306125,0.00633442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841361,0.0003701004,0.010519281,0.00014036272,0.000027253249,0.0005658053,0.0013922851,0.000008381572,0.0028404673],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991431,0.00022448109,0.00012800284,0.000043094078,0.00040227693,0.0000590635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943222,0.0016750966,0.0019560233,0.0002938654,0.00093582086,0.0008170404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014751969,0.00038146062,0.0003394854,0.000859905,0.0002331563,0.0005307498,0.000425707,0.00058206613,0.0061026793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007777077,0.00019612841,0.00073971465,0.0004612333,0.0002795916,0.00047221844,0.00055631786,0.0008516622,0.0010300085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006245474,0.0022542975,0.88441163,0.0002730528,0.00042335372,0.00021744084,0.0010511364,0.0016279643,0.004145831,0.00081063324,0.003354775,0.1008054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008056458,0.0009647125,0.9885169,0.00007576684,0.000091761765,0.00037909733,0.0005575961,0.002588983,0.0012836921,0.0012869478,0.0041394443,0.00003446459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004379665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001130045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061026793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021461029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034175333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020415485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991737179","doi":"10.1509/jmkr.39.3.336.19105","title":"Understanding the Role of Preference Revision and Concession in Group Decisions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Product (mathematics); Group decision-making; Affect (linguistics); Group (periodic table); Marketing; Economics; Microeconomics; Business; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6854442531007234,"score_gpt":0.4879130225551921,"score_spread":0.19753123054553134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991737179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7879678,0.0018526728,0.16954002,0.0036908116,0.00009026213,0.00012471687,0.000049942846,0.000067842244,0.036615964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921261,0.00020805621,0.006834371,0.000073630166,0.000038510138,0.000020889112,0.000014836675,0.0000051266115,0.00067838054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940102,0.0036847007,0.0002555071,0.00065307965,0.0008751181,0.0005214681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9330838,0.05159173,0.007325101,0.0035064192,0.0028353771,0.0016575983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012779516,0.00059083576,0.00080454076,0.001083406,0.0009974312,0.0037069027,0.00079902995,0.0015944677,0.0029361856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05221451,0.00042020812,0.00061711564,0.00078813895,0.0036448075,0.0063335956,0.0017821684,0.0022049495,0.00025674512],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00202059,0.00084850885,0.111656785,0.00060691364,0.00045964165,0.0010844783,0.024100345,0.06911945,0.006170452,0.491731,0.0016233049,0.29057857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013907872,0.00064247433,0.063056774,0.00011873873,0.00020518876,0.00043998388,0.0042780857,0.15757568,0.0020799658,0.76686615,0.00444546,0.00015235251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002747924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032046514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012779516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014642489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001217328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06758535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991848957","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2015.1016450","title":"Better but still biased: Analytic cognitive style and belief bias","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive bias; Cognition; Analytic reasoning; Cognitive style; Cognitive psychology; Heuristic; Confirmation bias; Style (visual arts); Debiasing; Response bias; Deductive reasoning; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.21927638075755815,"score_gpt":0.3909617875035358,"score_spread":0.17168540674597763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991848957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99119604,0.0003418362,0.0021698542,0.00042440166,0.00002192958,0.00001149912,0.000045392502,0.000013522605,0.0057754056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853694,0.00009854559,0.00084070355,0.00011854175,0.000028715187,0.000007748994,0.000030179392,0.000007951616,0.00033073634],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982085,0.00073965616,0.00014335594,0.00026112996,0.000521729,0.00012562725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94483703,0.037880648,0.009064545,0.0042104293,0.002297305,0.0017101697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039634146,0.0002864474,0.0003087973,0.0008925399,0.00023721627,0.0021755002,0.00031052643,0.0006595596,0.0036579692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049001556,0.00015476218,0.0003251211,0.0005896341,0.0012649321,0.0014532034,0.00087944366,0.0011075832,0.00037290403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014605025,0.0010039936,0.87831384,0.00019716163,0.00056895486,0.00032921077,0.0067588943,0.0019799117,0.011729476,0.014162591,0.00066000805,0.08283534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009973892,0.00057410344,0.9422385,0.000094817864,0.0001933541,0.0007162845,0.0020145548,0.005828577,0.0027851039,0.043848775,0.0015438242,0.00006243217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000555242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044352212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039634146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002883559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002691387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020960748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992360739","doi":"10.1080/13546805.2012.663901","title":"Reasoning heuristics across the psychosis continuum: The contribution of hypersalient evidence–hypothesis matches","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; Heuristics; Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Delusion; Conceptualization; Task (project management); Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.14748387289283332,"score_gpt":0.409925240830831,"score_spread":0.26244136793799766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992360739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989404,0.000046788227,0.00059050496,0.000041507774,7.1117523e-7,0.000011876829,0.000008348938,0.0000052691003,0.0003546534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950266,0.000017077975,0.00043051373,0.000008244669,9.3356067e-7,0.000003831992,0.000012939994,9.689384e-7,0.000022786915],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803716,0.0006911331,0.00017930518,0.00023338661,0.00070924486,0.00014986111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9707334,0.016654527,0.008224415,0.0024112128,0.00084200816,0.0011344936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034471473,0.0004068765,0.0003632992,0.001999553,0.00044434034,0.0014134854,0.00049731205,0.0004684549,0.0014458887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03158172,0.0004112441,0.0003382326,0.0005274254,0.001960549,0.0012887347,0.002234,0.00093300483,0.00007197308],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059354,0.00023164583,0.9582222,0.00007911746,0.00016061943,0.00063738006,0.004147017,0.0012093238,0.0059949537,0.0010780091,0.00008930223,0.02755687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006134547,0.0005371034,0.97428006,0.00006116829,0.000076901546,0.0028585936,0.0027308932,0.0069803437,0.0024895105,0.009537324,0.00033840424,0.000048286864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013789928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011360754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034471473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004951384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049524626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018230438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993972343","doi":"10.1214/105051604000000756","title":"Generalized stochastic differential utility and preference for information","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Annals of Applied Probability","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Preference; Differential (mechanical device); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Econometrics; Statistics; Physics","score_opus":0.34637374225379663,"score_gpt":0.40514627505927175,"score_spread":0.05877253280547512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993972343","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4025091,0.0015681444,0.5459022,0.0047181263,0.0001421252,0.000060302427,0.00019636925,0.00007647984,0.044827174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97383815,0.00050492253,0.022044407,0.00023009133,0.00010327927,0.000033822154,0.000060566355,0.000011252917,0.0031734335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983498,0.0007452074,0.00007823009,0.00018395866,0.0004773022,0.00016549136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970078,0.0017225958,0.00037447395,0.0003716436,0.00031184923,0.0002115899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024311638,0.00046793226,0.0004889794,0.00069891877,0.00038319407,0.001504374,0.00057354907,0.0009809925,0.0023474367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065091704,0.00019636755,0.0006503772,0.0008101113,0.0021397735,0.0028967327,0.0010761542,0.0012357739,0.00017986106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021175212,0.000011909275,0.0004218906,0.00002813834,0.000017934257,0.000083959116,0.00016180842,0.006583868,0.0006238428,0.9853596,0.00021486134,0.006471001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009772089,0.00002682085,0.00056770205,0.000011098262,0.000007762968,0.00007784902,0.00005875809,0.018147273,0.00018094745,0.97929376,0.0016050369,0.000013137198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065868994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055582233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024311638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011055662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044835598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0128573775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994476934","doi":"10.1080/01973530802659844","title":"I Knew It All Along, Unless I Had to Work to Learn What I Know","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Basic and Applied Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Cognition; Knowledge level; Work (physics); Mathematics education","score_opus":0.15620093106182265,"score_gpt":0.45600478288758556,"score_spread":0.2998038518257629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994476934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9435913,0.0015327561,0.0114645995,0.003186461,0.00029320724,0.00009746216,0.00024121285,0.00013114503,0.03946174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886127,0.000731782,0.0050613657,0.00082232885,0.00008462247,0.00004411472,0.00018984429,0.000023394608,0.004429826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856,0.00040218612,0.00012714947,0.00027263214,0.00045417028,0.00018391511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97198445,0.012518527,0.006820767,0.003399653,0.0028380714,0.0024384875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037090199,0.00041412737,0.00046637724,0.00066269207,0.00080846366,0.0018021377,0.00052376697,0.0015260581,0.00937792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031623017,0.0004075739,0.000617617,0.0003672412,0.0013289346,0.0031321861,0.0014571921,0.0019704245,0.0022909162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0050893505,0.0032166925,0.5707233,0.0016809246,0.0010040619,0.0014068083,0.024076395,0.0016641947,0.040456492,0.021450752,0.014454825,0.31477618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020825413,0.005243396,0.8670991,0.0009374962,0.0007487567,0.0034674,0.017430363,0.0042354856,0.0201009,0.03723486,0.04291481,0.00037927323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005843597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007455901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00937792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004681761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003572193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03137231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994622582","doi":"10.1016/s0304-4068(01)00060-x","title":"Rank-dependent preferences without ranking axioms","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical economics; Weighting; Rank (graph theory); Dual (grammatical number); Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Outcome (game theory); Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematics; Axiomatic system; Property (philosophy); Computer science; Decision theory; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.16462797547617009,"score_gpt":0.3913393237749928,"score_spread":0.22671134829882272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994622582","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041577,0.00081056374,0.90139043,0.0042580166,0.0003658818,0.00012744157,0.0008595357,0.00027637754,0.05033469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66896147,0.0016879145,0.27375382,0.0018451134,0.0012526978,0.00048517663,0.0013655319,0.000304118,0.05034417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903503,0.004698256,0.0007193474,0.001238642,0.0021471283,0.00084635534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96577024,0.020457247,0.002505006,0.005833937,0.0042013275,0.0012322696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008634765,0.0012835757,0.0019863255,0.0020412295,0.001763856,0.0061612963,0.002565018,0.0029172155,0.010951032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03838008,0.001510791,0.0017899352,0.002630164,0.0031914483,0.018132895,0.0033988291,0.005987086,0.0026828644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003610116,0.000034401935,0.0001432851,0.00006222101,0.000023010514,0.00004303508,0.000054330096,0.0017694698,0.00023284786,0.98665684,0.0021058333,0.008838641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015520125,0.00001635651,0.000068536545,0.0000087632025,0.000011789863,0.00007242071,0.000018066732,0.010013388,0.00021399489,0.9881555,0.001391594,0.000014042663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009071041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010364855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010951032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015690911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017530825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045665503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994669758","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2013.875942","title":"Belief bias is stronger when reasoning is more difficult","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Task (project management); Dual process theory (moral psychology); Debiasing; Belief structure; Dual (grammatical number); Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.09637316939967731,"score_gpt":0.363925256305812,"score_spread":0.2675520869061347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994669758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99563557,0.00032629163,0.0020111967,0.00017921795,0.000017393017,0.000021991698,0.00004425839,0.00001613571,0.0017479411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983473,0.000106628,0.0011810339,0.000112314425,0.00002499586,0.000015829834,0.000047416845,0.0000106120615,0.000153907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597126,0.0013815134,0.00043672614,0.0007563127,0.0012142417,0.00023992066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8404381,0.11445706,0.030508734,0.010001715,0.0029020256,0.0016923307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078090397,0.00051200745,0.0007599917,0.0011803152,0.0003032705,0.0020708889,0.00044916663,0.001117946,0.0044358117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06849802,0.00052717305,0.0006166973,0.00077470485,0.0014962879,0.0015630263,0.001548256,0.0017581701,0.00024503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010024018,0.0019214487,0.7717165,0.001580521,0.0020049508,0.00093663123,0.009214073,0.0013792269,0.10684892,0.00456679,0.0006050294,0.089201935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038733703,0.0015017347,0.9694294,0.00012331875,0.0004523193,0.0012650369,0.0015909452,0.0016447017,0.0133009665,0.009038496,0.0011782446,0.00008743309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042195202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005412989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078090397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033233644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023561741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041298687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995081088","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2013.844729","title":"Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":878,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Test (biology); Dual process theory (moral psychology); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Measure (data warehouse); Reliability (semiconductor); Variance (accounting); Information processing; Reflection (computer programming); Dual (grammatical number); Prime (order theory); Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Data mining","score_opus":0.0971559523513711,"score_gpt":0.39984466099706467,"score_spread":0.3026887086456936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995081088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98282456,0.00022415115,0.0078186765,0.00025037798,0.00005882654,0.0010744602,0.00086521334,0.00017495126,0.006708746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629879,0.00034025975,0.027521677,0.00036105476,0.0000752148,0.0010191592,0.0019287731,0.00006824503,0.005697779],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981616,0.00039292837,0.0003239856,0.00019763823,0.00077949057,0.00014429532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921123,0.0020933961,0.0027930415,0.0007764459,0.0016616439,0.0005631547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024430496,0.0008406258,0.0006879269,0.0016036708,0.000269993,0.00078791066,0.000850795,0.0009331039,0.0028038053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010506804,0.00036551213,0.00082883507,0.000700021,0.00027934727,0.0010698197,0.0010375971,0.0016110429,0.00098942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019782523,0.007862624,0.75533044,0.00033410205,0.00060660637,0.0007621941,0.0017873996,0.0032084181,0.027102437,0.0013885822,0.0067036347,0.19293518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021614919,0.0047141253,0.9661759,0.000059704074,0.00014319408,0.0019457471,0.00029835955,0.0073436457,0.013588118,0.0016260272,0.0037833261,0.000105664265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006602517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089968805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028038053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024485207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051575806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012920201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996324419","doi":"10.1007/s00355-015-0876-5","title":"Expected utility without full transitivity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transitive relation; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Class (philosophy); Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Completeness (order theory); Subjective expected utility; Mathematics; Economics; Econometrics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.2373221207991091,"score_gpt":0.42417190135042226,"score_spread":0.18684978055131315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996324419","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15259853,0.0018404428,0.7577174,0.009292777,0.000334825,0.00029058626,0.0023738786,0.00036531722,0.0751863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9296142,0.0014175698,0.039945595,0.00088404794,0.00041892094,0.00046073706,0.00066409755,0.00014401824,0.02645086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994886,0.002506599,0.00027066038,0.0009564498,0.00062355306,0.0007567281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97425324,0.020156872,0.0011723643,0.002763489,0.0010861729,0.000567917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008361343,0.0014287028,0.0031084705,0.0022482055,0.000840442,0.004162254,0.002732097,0.0024859703,0.010362526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027662547,0.0016314734,0.0028895633,0.001993168,0.0048254766,0.013076138,0.0034912708,0.0045619197,0.0010241815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009406484,0.00005358958,0.0004077277,0.00011979235,0.00006483783,0.00013560383,0.00010223367,0.009723041,0.0002289311,0.9826806,0.0011261035,0.005263412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020945045,0.000019884172,0.00017412001,0.000023119734,0.000017276474,0.00009640695,0.000021983382,0.0236846,0.00012873355,0.975339,0.00046342774,0.000010542321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022052808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011980531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010362526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002870506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023110656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044219494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996408424","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2423352","title":"Evidence on Individual Preferences for Longevity Risk","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Longevity; Longevity risk; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.2020312407840326,"score_gpt":0.4011080707502904,"score_spread":0.19907682996625783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996408424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.986108,0.0012538796,0.0007625412,0.00048747024,0.00001753038,0.0000046274636,0.0004199562,0.00000474296,0.010941321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976672,0.00077601336,0.00032249774,0.00013950141,0.000024394938,0.0000046965806,0.00031957665,0.0000025047523,0.0007436515],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921715,0.00038251482,0.00007814036,0.00012654315,0.00013422284,0.00006140277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95612115,0.034300342,0.004790045,0.0025530974,0.001246237,0.0009891008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042124004,0.0002928486,0.00036255945,0.0010126671,0.00033048433,0.0010007051,0.00036820452,0.00081044604,0.012800602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014555113,0.00016813862,0.00047904992,0.0011482489,0.0007716652,0.0006259063,0.00053962,0.0007740769,0.00091535953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056115133,0.00061826414,0.88477683,0.0004522927,0.0011483532,0.0004516582,0.0018294164,0.0012042818,0.0023659195,0.006032048,0.00147138,0.094038054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016308705,0.001111769,0.97681206,0.00016142931,0.00052423944,0.0007827559,0.0014659096,0.0007468339,0.0016878996,0.01137684,0.005122638,0.000044473574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001044278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010996787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012800602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019483747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011156688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0428223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997098523","doi":"10.1177/0146167207303014","title":"Motivated Prediction of Future Feelings: Effects of Negative Mood and Mood Orientation on Affective Forecasts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Feeling; Mood; Negative mood; Orientation (vector space); Affect (linguistics); Social psychology","score_opus":0.13290798073529012,"score_gpt":0.4459819949172987,"score_spread":0.31307401418200853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997098523","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02799013,0.9612346,0.0020270802,0.0008987045,0.00016745132,0.00003515813,0.00009296155,0.000019521456,0.007534343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12367938,0.8729511,0.0016004841,0.0002870026,0.00032203793,0.000046414807,0.000101972,0.000008313705,0.0010033054],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995883,0.00017505647,0.000028471308,0.000052363957,0.00013919432,0.000016663647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976031,0.0017854124,0.00030054263,0.000031173247,0.0002228554,0.000056951685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014069384,0.00051165133,0.001089812,0.00068201654,0.00013189034,0.0008361963,0.00048901455,0.0005923519,0.0015492293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042558354,0.00015928874,0.00038957378,0.00075879693,0.00044630724,0.0004814365,0.00029497428,0.0005821033,0.00059277576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002816034,0.00014502545,0.019309748,0.0045631677,0.00042976424,0.00017947525,0.00017238974,0.00097568956,0.0011508252,0.0021326237,0.0031129615,0.96754676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033655635,0.0025540206,0.60972047,0.009512229,0.0031617277,0.009046873,0.0012477126,0.006024649,0.0050150403,0.026317818,0.32681963,0.00024328231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010100766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001654818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0015492293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034650075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035733735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007440686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997697391","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2009.01.007","title":"The Maximization Paradox: The costs of seeking alternatives","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personality and Individual Differences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sacrifice; Psychology; Maximization; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.19789693230308184,"score_gpt":0.3878109505490901,"score_spread":0.18991401824600826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997697391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70807946,0.009330203,0.12507701,0.041629244,0.00043080913,0.000114297334,0.00029015445,0.00007077175,0.11497814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988794,0.0009300351,0.007545018,0.0007192692,0.00018897421,0.000050458162,0.000023469613,0.000011778257,0.0017370307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969613,0.0021710026,0.00006756322,0.00021170438,0.0004713186,0.00011712763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95643204,0.03815429,0.0017362757,0.0020740903,0.00078414654,0.0008191753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067243557,0.00040303715,0.0008592669,0.00061017985,0.0005715224,0.0029952857,0.0012011634,0.002390307,0.007833855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054446477,0.0002944907,0.00045256774,0.0007969607,0.004192745,0.0077584474,0.0015121116,0.0027180924,0.00027002746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058719184,0.0002451373,0.005570704,0.00020923058,0.00012982021,0.00027879231,0.0005765794,0.011556249,0.0010287303,0.926588,0.0032425835,0.049986966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048350797,0.000041147534,0.0023492451,0.00003772383,0.000024589464,0.00014046811,0.00017602945,0.011301338,0.00015283571,0.98469573,0.0010162898,0.000016112039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039958186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049092685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007833855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008045431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080688327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035562217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000166164","doi":"10.1016/j.strusafe.2007.09.007","title":"Application of cumulative prospect theory: Implied seismic design preference","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Structural Safety","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cumulative prospect theory; Weighting; Prospect theory; Preference; Bounded rationality; Rationality; Expected utility hypothesis; Seismic analysis; Econometrics; Seismic risk; Sensitivity (control systems); Computer science; Economics; Engineering; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Structural engineering","score_opus":0.1310299700131957,"score_gpt":0.39955937454729396,"score_spread":0.26852940453409824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000166164","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1973402,0.0007883622,0.77264404,0.0037950452,0.00013414718,0.0000966743,0.00026523744,0.000088893794,0.024847368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955255,0.0007873948,0.03955262,0.00017099724,0.00015964435,0.00009928352,0.000120306075,0.000018308123,0.003836435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722075,0.0019811655,0.00007978144,0.0002537319,0.00034404584,0.00012054132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.958894,0.036969095,0.0013773986,0.0013594703,0.00095440744,0.00044560395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060737585,0.0012013768,0.0015348208,0.0013869287,0.00059369626,0.0027394772,0.0016962392,0.002567399,0.0104501005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04650964,0.00060812,0.00095110596,0.0018772662,0.0021400445,0.004833592,0.0015907843,0.002937023,0.0003213578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018065482,0.00018163692,0.002072004,0.000178002,0.00010205109,0.00015277723,0.00026312834,0.1326739,0.0003528391,0.8396337,0.0012753553,0.02293399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039313763,0.000055645654,0.0005870991,0.000022662905,0.00003995046,0.000044540382,0.00006927274,0.27537483,0.0001117409,0.7231654,0.00046667844,0.000022909635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001612157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020070004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0104501005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001509834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012951382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034959078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000481529","doi":"10.4236/jss.2014.23006","title":"The Role of Gender in Individual and Group Decision Making: A Research Model","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Journal of Social Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Group decision-making; Affect (linguistics); Preference; Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Social psychology; Actuarial science; Economics; Microeconomics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.46614455899107005,"score_gpt":0.5492682646874876,"score_spread":0.08312370569641753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000481529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70246375,0.0024776065,0.2091953,0.009533595,0.00027425034,0.00096227654,0.00083581987,0.00010319915,0.07415414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733464,0.0011006274,0.016889866,0.00039258413,0.000072303774,0.00040637513,0.00008490988,0.000008783263,0.0076980996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982224,0.0010311406,0.000044101864,0.00026911034,0.00015133618,0.00028179912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99346995,0.0051431507,0.0005544946,0.00016973789,0.0002421823,0.00042042916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055920403,0.0011413841,0.0012275513,0.0014361346,0.0009961834,0.0027762966,0.0020366926,0.0025422536,0.016206117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007162857,0.00034830978,0.001257846,0.0015711398,0.0024594492,0.0026853802,0.0012415679,0.0012797414,0.0015664083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015449746,0.0021114328,0.043607097,0.0005356298,0.00024864968,0.0014959477,0.00708004,0.059852418,0.0028006162,0.8380751,0.0029911923,0.03965685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005808045,0.0014172742,0.017621651,0.00025233268,0.00043641924,0.0009145232,0.0045367745,0.48928413,0.00052108435,0.47695303,0.0073590465,0.00012286752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027129876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016411546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016206117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016011167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014726166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054214835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001117071","doi":"10.1093/geronb/60.4.p215","title":"Framing Effects in Younger and Older Adults","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journals of Gerontology Series B","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Framing (construction); Psychology; History","score_opus":0.07751531858098035,"score_gpt":0.3957720358829111,"score_spread":0.3182567173019307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001117071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960459,0.00066034624,0.00012417867,0.00015053804,0.00002206807,0.000013502554,0.000073440366,0.0000040421564,0.002906036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982394,0.00038731247,0.00018684207,0.00016188102,0.00007137557,0.000019216082,0.0000971017,0.0000035310647,0.0008333386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938154,0.00021796419,0.000068911526,0.00012180921,0.0001410019,0.000068777386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99028033,0.005326076,0.0021757863,0.00045520876,0.0007351425,0.0010275079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034133466,0.0002512251,0.00055497425,0.0008618548,0.00049752166,0.0011270934,0.00013591173,0.00073156436,0.0052695135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019488487,0.00020740635,0.00035757234,0.00034664632,0.0004982924,0.00083452114,0.00075435644,0.00070775766,0.00041490226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015764773,0.0029105537,0.75896955,0.00036548113,0.00046351683,0.0015605607,0.063535996,0.00066257286,0.016469322,0.0058572483,0.003082285,0.13035813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002695995,0.0015750026,0.9831722,0.000061125465,0.00017813388,0.00059043785,0.004743528,0.0005299161,0.0012362679,0.004339955,0.0032502946,0.00005352412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029334675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023453238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052695135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014996447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018051744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001136280","doi":"10.1108/10610420710834940","title":"Bundles = discount? Revisiting complex theories of bundle effects","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Product & Brand Management","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Bundle; Test (biology); Economics; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.06909435262192272,"score_gpt":0.39120127922761805,"score_spread":0.32210692660569534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001136280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47887787,0.006728445,0.18306361,0.019477876,0.00079228036,0.00023249058,0.00049118244,0.00027510643,0.31006107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98268753,0.001200207,0.011697797,0.0009888747,0.00018989942,0.00006367043,0.00010484202,0.00008685983,0.0029802723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981382,0.0007995319,0.000085906955,0.00036225468,0.00051467307,0.00009951516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658611,0.025079098,0.003501359,0.0028901948,0.002027269,0.00064095116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005489488,0.0007318517,0.0006456465,0.001777195,0.00083439273,0.004168134,0.0014891161,0.0017392393,0.027002048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02764367,0.00064817275,0.0012092493,0.0012416412,0.004453303,0.010882554,0.0022108753,0.0028447935,0.0011580251],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030430604,0.00027130765,0.0107490625,0.00039360582,0.00013493675,0.00022499189,0.003268453,0.0030419128,0.0008689614,0.9296251,0.002002215,0.049115196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077410696,0.00013855782,0.014509967,0.0001834508,0.00011811681,0.00024302195,0.0009870536,0.012729063,0.0003633239,0.9622147,0.008395426,0.000039905415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011615942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009264475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027002048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001467138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055013056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09033084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001362003","doi":"10.1080/02699930701739849","title":"Causal uncertainty and metacognitive inferences about goal attainment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition & Emotion","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Feeling; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Metacognition; Social psychology; Cognition; Causal inference; Metamemory; Developmental psychology; Econometrics","score_opus":0.17357594901221282,"score_gpt":0.3853860977493752,"score_spread":0.2118101487371624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001362003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96369696,0.001683827,0.012953046,0.000770365,0.000033769855,0.000054852422,0.00006772324,0.000028060744,0.020711357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788886,0.00028230093,0.0013928148,0.000081042635,0.00001887023,0.000019774832,0.000024918565,0.000004163008,0.00028710553],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988261,0.0003845967,0.00010708522,0.00021081697,0.00036912094,0.00010228829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9333043,0.05178671,0.009178182,0.0030286284,0.0019419801,0.0007602072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003995256,0.00039092236,0.00032300045,0.0012927036,0.0004682379,0.002186064,0.00053827616,0.0008555648,0.0026107384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039194234,0.00024366504,0.000410633,0.00051118335,0.0014616144,0.0027230126,0.0015174724,0.0012762758,0.00010417756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047717146,0.0026784216,0.34309918,0.0029869997,0.0016219944,0.00090451806,0.040011607,0.008724548,0.031517114,0.16540901,0.0015746065,0.39670035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032952594,0.0012960625,0.7133908,0.00075661443,0.0010492291,0.0007895833,0.008628568,0.011900491,0.02246771,0.22903165,0.010017655,0.00034215514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082277786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083837233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003995256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006333689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003346411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02112919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001678613","doi":"10.1167/14.10.1061","title":"Familiarity wins over novelty: A persistent attentional bias toward regularities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Novelty; Random forest; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Pattern recognition (psychology); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.19506664713326635,"score_gpt":0.40634928934643605,"score_spread":0.2112826422131697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001678613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99526167,0.00027353028,0.0021654544,0.00022374086,0.000032484804,0.000012360357,0.00003207843,0.000050542894,0.001948188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983187,0.00009968761,0.0005876711,0.00018732954,0.00003794657,0.000010226788,0.00004017704,0.000026323682,0.00069186825],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993536,0.000059520655,0.000037134818,0.00024551488,0.00021867221,0.00008543831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996009,0.0010801571,0.00090767624,0.0011418432,0.00037969116,0.00048158123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074393005,0.00018759536,0.0004373655,0.00032354813,0.00030620745,0.00085250125,0.0004893265,0.00059049315,0.0022945234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005602245,0.00035441236,0.0003086313,0.00018384223,0.00072732155,0.0013080337,0.0009326373,0.0009920072,0.00028778872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015526254,0.00022476683,0.115967736,0.00018158721,0.00018980408,0.00063631934,0.0012508291,0.00050131796,0.78216285,0.0017439631,0.0013847548,0.09420339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008871314,0.0007644434,0.96290433,0.000029772082,0.000084040716,0.0010758678,0.00054547,0.0021923184,0.02649971,0.0038102525,0.0019443828,0.00006063035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011027819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013315864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022945234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003602746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021051441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007675886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003371167","doi":"10.1142/s021759081350001x","title":"VALUATIONS OF CHANGES IN RISKS: THE REFERENCE STATE AND EVIDENCE OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE MEASURES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Singapore Economic Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Harm; Valuation (finance); Value (mathematics); Actuarial science; Economics; Willingness to pay; Econometrics; Psychology; Statistics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Finance","score_opus":0.5790716842212912,"score_gpt":0.47581489895102164,"score_spread":0.10325678527026955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003371167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7249801,0.018000295,0.13047457,0.009934893,0.0005709086,0.00042947315,0.0011796481,0.0000937607,0.11433634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860196,0.0015572857,0.011252354,0.00022971882,0.00006155693,0.0001613911,0.00025113084,0.000016968677,0.00045011003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96836656,0.02080761,0.0021735975,0.0018707016,0.0063371863,0.00044436508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83934873,0.10581249,0.022438956,0.0150220655,0.015746096,0.0016317163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04696512,0.00060734845,0.0010614212,0.0066887755,0.0008330445,0.0060553746,0.0016688942,0.0018267176,0.0029159524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23751327,0.0004163502,0.0012796565,0.0065290723,0.0072363424,0.0135559635,0.0035927233,0.0035742312,0.00030092432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020391452,0.00040495917,0.087658815,0.0012695045,0.0015295136,0.0003407907,0.00999261,0.011985777,0.001540473,0.6428244,0.0030038266,0.23741016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017459453,0.0013618959,0.18751533,0.0026627958,0.0005596426,0.000474637,0.0089336485,0.020196836,0.002164811,0.7576679,0.017975943,0.0003120629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018481031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015306678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04696512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002736666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001001887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24837828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004621686","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2010.12.005","title":"Debiasing or rebiasing? Moderating the illusion of delayed incentives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Debiasing; Illusion; Incentive; Illusion of control; Cognitive psychology; Discounting; Psychology; Economics; Cognitive bias; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Cognition; Finance","score_opus":0.17832780228749712,"score_gpt":0.48335023824217876,"score_spread":0.30502243595468165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004621686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97932714,0.0006941191,0.009968565,0.0019792921,0.00014822154,0.00005815782,0.000074247066,0.00010302268,0.00764709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960905,0.00014156298,0.0026284799,0.00036190214,0.000059235626,0.000019458757,0.000019559542,0.000058719805,0.0006205751],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591124,0.0021034132,0.0002472626,0.00065721956,0.00070812093,0.0003726958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86903644,0.09572473,0.018388348,0.012083499,0.0021557966,0.0026112767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011357055,0.0006224574,0.0008471173,0.00050620653,0.00041584208,0.002545903,0.00084335805,0.0018064394,0.010920726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1475395,0.0005679546,0.00027799117,0.00035551607,0.0017113268,0.0036910237,0.0016645226,0.0032946186,0.00063019537],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.037143033,0.005953998,0.19512299,0.0016291994,0.0009830344,0.00090554846,0.009452356,0.013504928,0.2764367,0.21021087,0.0044130133,0.2442443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028790387,0.005868916,0.39679664,0.00050826586,0.0016593536,0.0012979319,0.0024658295,0.064525686,0.05668012,0.45476815,0.012079354,0.00047063717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006252236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004924261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011357055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005456455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073069514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060062587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005019135","doi":"10.1037/a0019466","title":"Positive mood effects on delay discounting.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emotion","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Extraversion and introversion; Delay discounting; Mood; Affect (linguistics); Delay of gratification; Discounting; Personality; Developmental psychology; Temporal discounting; Situational ethics; Social psychology; Impulsivity; Big Five personality traits","score_opus":0.038430467147049154,"score_gpt":0.36229430862883577,"score_spread":0.3238638414817866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005019135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99546295,0.00045592952,0.00023082642,0.00005276713,0.000022907678,0.00001224673,0.0001223895,0.000010188261,0.0036298411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860543,0.0002804287,0.00025161164,0.000040451865,0.00001161395,0.0000072625444,0.00007513466,0.0000038495605,0.0007241154],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998437,0.00008230923,0.000009844789,0.000022216742,0.000022374019,0.000019480865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981756,0.00083400356,0.00043935262,0.00016042207,0.00007321628,0.00031741319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041510756,0.00031951597,0.00024115737,0.00016971407,0.00018791888,0.0005564359,0.000081737046,0.0001668913,0.0035665822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002270215,0.00013997576,0.00021894653,0.00010242704,0.00021097336,0.00014080197,0.00033448642,0.0005271718,0.00024877195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.056541044,0.008451219,0.30047122,0.0007432194,0.0007369744,0.0016048426,0.0014138065,0.0010125139,0.46153423,0.0033046922,0.0011934653,0.16299282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002471612,0.0068700854,0.96954924,0.00003697279,0.0003358678,0.0006766985,0.00015253351,0.0011539408,0.01804368,0.0011516134,0.0017574675,0.00002461651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038009827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048520762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035665822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014407319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006913699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011931419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005081301","doi":"10.1037/a0034207","title":"Do framing effects reveal irrational choice?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Framing effect; Framing (construction); Irrational number; Irrationality; Logical equivalence; Mathematical economics; Regret; Bounded function; Mathematics; Epistemology; Social psychology; Econometrics; Psychology; Positive economics; Economics; Discrete mathematics; Statistics; Philosophy; Rationality; Equivalence (formal languages); Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.11481998722434929,"score_gpt":0.47479841124140215,"score_spread":0.3599784240170529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005081301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91176873,0.001433197,0.048364624,0.0059398357,0.00029990662,0.00015560538,0.0005177599,0.00023942972,0.031280924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932795,0.00025926577,0.0045968387,0.0008852251,0.00014535866,0.000098694625,0.00014245258,0.00004418732,0.00054843473],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894236,0.005861243,0.00064054405,0.0013992029,0.0022644252,0.00041099335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82102245,0.12639934,0.022844918,0.023478566,0.005069337,0.0011853672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025104027,0.0005233482,0.0009240597,0.0017518922,0.0006331474,0.002044198,0.00063017436,0.0015723925,0.0062803123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17400146,0.00069867005,0.0005408904,0.0009170312,0.0039443593,0.0049994374,0.0019627495,0.0020820997,0.000514491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004813198,0.00076411234,0.4873796,0.0010184362,0.00082481175,0.0011636426,0.02274341,0.0024893978,0.023447275,0.18033436,0.0074872095,0.2675345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033608076,0.0006329442,0.37948096,0.0003760815,0.0005300454,0.0018187624,0.0042556003,0.014702158,0.012012801,0.5665834,0.018975103,0.0002960835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005538804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000444092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025104027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006220574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028326397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1327644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005262305","doi":"10.1007/s10339-012-0526-0","title":"Negative valence can evoke a liberal response bias in syllogistic reasoning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Processing","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Syllogism; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Valence (chemistry); Response bias; Analytic reasoning; Behavioural sciences; Social psychology; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Deductive reasoning; Philosophy; Physics; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.2911309358567643,"score_gpt":0.4497954750749713,"score_spread":0.158664539218207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005262305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97690195,0.0000723049,0.0046372307,0.000579538,0.00013786273,0.000027766973,0.00006439296,0.00006859231,0.017510317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683195,0.00005161818,0.0019995654,0.00024320289,0.00003771356,0.000021929001,0.00004949328,0.00005131524,0.000713355],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900264,0.00040537192,0.00006560421,0.000120413664,0.0003228484,0.00008311526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927039,0.004793946,0.0010038716,0.0006351586,0.00038806847,0.0004750959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014661506,0.00025186763,0.0002066251,0.00029165132,0.0002468419,0.0011680757,0.00022191963,0.00065768126,0.0038209462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015147222,0.00022728638,0.00015725412,0.00016331233,0.0006749359,0.00055290456,0.0006515622,0.0009603757,0.00035699585],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009584024,0.0016302817,0.047102656,0.0006519945,0.00020198703,0.001192573,0.0018781415,0.002027916,0.78672117,0.06413233,0.0045978855,0.08027899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013985158,0.0024509106,0.36828303,0.00024141038,0.00041880022,0.0040501547,0.0015135073,0.028903099,0.18842058,0.39419168,0.009909695,0.0002186194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013490887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018992466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038209462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023099559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022704898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012782395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005512101","doi":"10.1287/mksc.1040.0109","title":"Overchoice and Assortment Type: When and Why Variety Backfires","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marketing Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":450,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Variety (cybernetics); Set (abstract data type); Marketing; Product (mathematics); Product category; Business; Dimension (graph theory); Product type; Advertising; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08857236628370567,"score_gpt":0.38417165942157194,"score_spread":0.29559929313786626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005512101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9645023,0.0016714028,0.013581006,0.0021527898,0.00007342669,0.00005645519,0.00006755951,0.00005966383,0.017835481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965509,0.00033850392,0.0016857854,0.00050766126,0.000055217602,0.000022942666,0.000029215335,0.000023854755,0.00078582985],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940058,0.0025604677,0.00031795775,0.0010515872,0.0016905147,0.00037366257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9441583,0.03650429,0.008773547,0.0064993356,0.0019584012,0.0021060559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0113427425,0.00045512887,0.00073396304,0.0010619274,0.0011047375,0.0032990826,0.0009434696,0.0016753107,0.0059106853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0518712,0.00037829188,0.00093509577,0.0010397458,0.0049406104,0.0036720675,0.002477946,0.001993196,0.00049798307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036793188,0.001214266,0.60657614,0.0005187046,0.00088962965,0.0009314728,0.0064480086,0.008254076,0.015639374,0.117424145,0.0025756874,0.23584929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003294748,0.001189583,0.57314074,0.00027064688,0.00051521964,0.0013010231,0.0046709813,0.00996323,0.007971956,0.38741237,0.0130201485,0.0002146511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011726896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011315898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0113427425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013054115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005416638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05998689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005516635","doi":"10.1002/bdm.540","title":"Classifying simulated air threats with fast and frugal heuristics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Heuristic; Contrast (vision); Probabilistic logic; Constraint (computer-aided design); Task (project management); Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.09805858381858683,"score_gpt":0.4133919434235256,"score_spread":0.31533335960493875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005516635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955497,0.000022808692,0.0035550024,0.000023526749,0.0000058444207,0.000034847897,0.0000125000515,0.000019289817,0.000776502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995344,0.00002536966,0.0043076794,0.00003180897,0.000004500844,0.000017355303,0.00003742098,0.0000048831234,0.0002270125],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830794,0.0007634655,0.00013053296,0.00021626816,0.00044001304,0.00014184228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884282,0.007936719,0.0019182469,0.0008883635,0.0004409395,0.00038750737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031432721,0.0005218123,0.00039713492,0.0004835434,0.0002171337,0.0013704193,0.0003645574,0.00056221563,0.0008973436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01952748,0.00022881519,0.00029828446,0.00018631776,0.0007593572,0.0008664663,0.00064093,0.00055820215,0.00019148042],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010701987,0.0023165082,0.38893425,0.00069590093,0.00069463777,0.0006710174,0.0030927055,0.090098575,0.220776,0.010372983,0.0021468305,0.26949868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005898766,0.0082520675,0.26700988,0.000166952,0.00027141478,0.0009207325,0.0014128187,0.6224754,0.07424088,0.02121516,0.0032137856,0.00023118347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009752584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011407862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031432721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041516713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003161631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016623378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005521174","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1504_7","title":"Buyers Versus Sellers: How They Differ in Their Responses to Framed Outcomes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Database transaction; Promotion (chess); Transaction cost; Economics; Microeconomics; Marketing; Business; Advertising; Computer science","score_opus":0.23289350444889675,"score_gpt":0.4811013462976919,"score_spread":0.24820784184879516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005521174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883907,0.00023216802,0.00092006207,0.00066888466,0.00006450167,0.000047323378,0.000050838986,0.000007988015,0.0096175745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683774,0.00020248246,0.0004858168,0.0005331414,0.00002742833,0.00004415398,0.000074596624,0.000020944506,0.0017736934],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996554,0.0018788588,0.00014836434,0.00024450838,0.0008283271,0.0003459153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932585,0.0038754852,0.0010876278,0.0002729225,0.0008284351,0.0006770156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055590146,0.00018050085,0.0004209009,0.0007226604,0.00058822095,0.004482574,0.00024850856,0.0011982756,0.003711863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026864924,0.00037801667,0.00034435268,0.0004081085,0.0011355733,0.0017576957,0.0014657674,0.0012246094,0.00071270234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0064736716,0.0009225509,0.53408337,0.00041004742,0.0005512994,0.0020748856,0.30073786,0.00094213063,0.021948962,0.0145777445,0.0061997804,0.11107772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033228696,0.001078299,0.7179032,0.00017703522,0.00016108301,0.0011508355,0.2466163,0.002455144,0.0025645099,0.012980238,0.014371655,0.00020940093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010695119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008603271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055590146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054465205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024030375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029399216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005772722","doi":"10.1007/pl00004201","title":"Stochastically independent randomization and uncertainty aversion","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity aversion; Preference; Knightian uncertainty; Ambiguity; Expected utility hypothesis; Econometrics; Independence (probability theory); Mathematical economics; Economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Prior probability; Subjective expected utility; Mathematics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Bayesian probability; Statistics","score_opus":0.0504129661313184,"score_gpt":0.3471142026273193,"score_spread":0.2967012364960009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005772722","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24909908,0.0019599472,0.7084534,0.0060560075,0.00032570673,0.00016507541,0.00022313475,0.00024436708,0.03347328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960223,0.0010771028,0.030887056,0.00043942296,0.0002039384,0.00012869017,0.000072610725,0.00003453599,0.006933634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946089,0.0035523036,0.00019501183,0.00053622323,0.00066235417,0.00044527894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630864,0.028632376,0.004173488,0.0023345219,0.001092726,0.00068035355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075099235,0.00070379575,0.001693496,0.00090040977,0.00053173944,0.002473337,0.0011250708,0.0019150613,0.005044397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03519926,0.00065398443,0.0011161662,0.0009923365,0.0034434604,0.00335823,0.0015820604,0.0026646596,0.00043754603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014135643,0.0001147556,0.0009133667,0.00006014281,0.00007803332,0.00008277575,0.00007156173,0.03579102,0.00040124086,0.95219994,0.00076662336,0.009379286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039882663,0.0000366903,0.00063365535,0.000011310265,0.000022503811,0.000046045145,0.000021237167,0.04857831,0.00014542716,0.9498535,0.0005888323,0.000022615839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009207131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008093316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075099235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012434461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001208041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03971672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006330681","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2011.07.009","title":"Risky discounts: Do people prefer them on a per-item or per-purchase basis and why?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Preference; Value (mathematics); Perception; Economics; Mental accounting; Prospect theory; Distribution (mathematics); Differential (mechanical device); Advertising; Actuarial science; Psychology; Microeconomics; Business; Statistics","score_opus":0.2985034151578828,"score_gpt":0.43902127049129536,"score_spread":0.14051785533341254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006330681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842913,0.0019703656,0.0027783415,0.002682406,0.000103006154,0.000027735392,0.00020844101,0.000022621105,0.007915756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970686,0.00065519026,0.0009731139,0.0005159376,0.0000860035,0.000007267956,0.000092511036,0.000009047843,0.0005923764],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994747,0.00017472987,0.000037429145,0.00008230286,0.00016867202,0.00006219078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880363,0.0061278944,0.0027520133,0.00089134404,0.0009236437,0.0012688154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002361526,0.00027670505,0.00042804194,0.0004749138,0.00025933943,0.001875964,0.00036697977,0.0012269369,0.0059214565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025133925,0.00036009177,0.00046694308,0.00041502487,0.00080087996,0.0027043507,0.0004714028,0.0017710025,0.00069061684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009711768,0.0014380676,0.62769645,0.00073178834,0.0016494424,0.0005954565,0.004325215,0.0026124262,0.010770634,0.036820315,0.008647847,0.29500058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077181106,0.0012065858,0.80020505,0.00030468046,0.0012247525,0.001263807,0.0044967677,0.009828033,0.0020476368,0.16935049,0.00904669,0.00025367722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014524851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017406597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059214565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029729021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015418626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019809246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007402403","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2012.08.011","title":"Utility of a quarter-million","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Bernoulli's principle; Range (aeronautics); Taylor series; Function (biology); Econometrics; Economics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Taylor rule; Monetary policy; Mathematics; Keynesian economics; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.12999314181060748,"score_gpt":0.3608629765096567,"score_spread":0.23086983469904923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007402403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89604515,0.0043875654,0.019929593,0.010136,0.00047704251,0.000058736827,0.0066848584,0.0002757361,0.062005296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783539,0.00058994914,0.001213118,0.00011774117,0.000059366248,0.000012145719,0.0009106983,0.000012626322,0.018730512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995733,0.00022081319,0.000020877393,0.000051670664,0.00007343014,0.000059991973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982668,0.0011738379,0.000117615804,0.00012568037,0.00017910133,0.00013692501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009110204,0.00024621384,0.0003895515,0.00055881805,0.00028793392,0.0015355167,0.0004888482,0.0010884191,0.017083347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007568697,0.00014864984,0.0004247965,0.00096655625,0.00028804567,0.0011907247,0.0005815404,0.0006629937,0.0018201475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046025063,0.0009984921,0.1496221,0.0004017456,0.00078045705,0.0015958644,0.0010453659,0.1656393,0.0027967133,0.3569481,0.074693784,0.2408756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022435754,0.0009691668,0.11066553,0.00019149695,0.0005478634,0.0018459619,0.0041530994,0.45898917,0.0025869599,0.35875323,0.060914975,0.00015814244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004673218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037848244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017083347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007503286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042360503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05714947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007991621","doi":"10.1001/archneur.57.12.1791","title":"Comment on Berry and Hachinski","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archives of Neurology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Berry; Botany; Biology","score_opus":0.08023214505637993,"score_gpt":0.3630877879362251,"score_spread":0.28285564287984516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007991621","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000106799176,0.00095323066,0.00005264829,0.98140633,0.016584976,0.000004952086,0.00006159854,0.000012473633,0.0008169377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009852538,0.00045281104,0.00005603133,0.9757652,0.021280168,0.000017561884,0.000018357527,0.000014498404,0.0014099944],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994175,0.0011743275,0.00072976167,0.0012722629,0.0018236502,0.00082493393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9402636,0.04166547,0.0029793144,0.0019217543,0.010185976,0.0029837927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011256771,0.0014271832,0.0029578987,0.0021192217,0.0060794493,0.0069958935,0.0068752063,0.08323325,0.014326422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07963376,0.0014110847,0.002679995,0.0032876641,0.009373355,0.008901762,0.003954342,0.08181755,0.013118364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033435386,0.000006719373,0.00009959217,0.00004286062,0.000011431476,0.00009765685,0.00008570093,0.000018131168,0.00001961305,0.0032336654,0.9953086,0.0010427297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019495678,0.000028208378,0.0018776807,0.000596413,0.00008023658,0.00044434587,0.00073227106,0.00024878536,0.00024756245,0.028978607,0.9664501,0.00012086317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027883604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030770704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08323325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077511715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069049266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059532225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008579124","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x03240115","title":"The rationality debate as a progressive research program","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Irrational number; Heuristics; Ecological rationality; Epistemology; Theme (computing); Irrationality; Point (geometry); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Psychology; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.47192109140994104,"score_gpt":0.5840468023299901,"score_spread":0.11212571092004903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008579124","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014535088,0.022379166,0.02950463,0.75236654,0.0017905922,0.00004316478,0.00006947828,0.000085353044,0.17922592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89583844,0.012445178,0.015468353,0.047230847,0.0056365803,0.00025519228,0.000059355916,0.00012217223,0.022943893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98373103,0.009769592,0.00040324233,0.0020912564,0.0031219923,0.0008828562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9398232,0.047921833,0.0019067171,0.0041388534,0.0046392274,0.0015702095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042278923,0.0006563888,0.0008968778,0.0032465793,0.0041540754,0.010617626,0.003125009,0.008287212,0.006978977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048066903,0.00038330676,0.0008450976,0.001954473,0.05820262,0.02224652,0.0067458814,0.013608028,0.0008849828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058226165,0.000007551384,0.00005647967,0.000016825883,0.0000024096757,0.0000069213365,0.00019758983,0.00014116206,0.000013932461,0.99604034,0.0015407895,0.0019701377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015117742,0.00000925745,0.00010537416,0.00007471021,0.0000031757695,0.00001344051,0.00029125443,0.00051768986,0.000068857196,0.9761741,0.022721516,0.00000546973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002608383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014122409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042278923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008095322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072500026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22359502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009241456","doi":"10.1086/599045","title":"The Influence of Categorical Attributes on Choice Context Effects","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical variable; Context (archaeology); Library science; Psychology; Sociology; Advertising; Computer science; History; Business","score_opus":0.26603361681559656,"score_gpt":0.5172143874819393,"score_spread":0.2511807706663427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009241456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97364783,0.0005708709,0.009163197,0.00015176785,0.00005081386,0.000058674268,0.000087541965,0.000056566314,0.016212735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99547124,0.00012041318,0.0038683878,0.000058237838,0.000026464337,0.000025014315,0.000030178406,0.000025229145,0.000374839],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954336,0.0022029607,0.00026159408,0.00052147085,0.0013690683,0.00021136465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9394267,0.050488357,0.003209528,0.0035397692,0.0017327766,0.0016029049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032038442,0.00045942655,0.0005472338,0.0005843257,0.00059594755,0.0018049704,0.00045842625,0.0004999924,0.005715714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03468435,0.0003227702,0.00036919455,0.0003599958,0.00095828174,0.001291708,0.0015118417,0.0012955557,0.00034186902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010463515,0.001866301,0.085891925,0.0015925381,0.00039040303,0.0009086855,0.0032306104,0.008886726,0.6648055,0.05054105,0.00076993875,0.17065284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009019453,0.0049802554,0.6347601,0.00036222467,0.0013826847,0.0023499911,0.0019618785,0.056506697,0.17349066,0.10964026,0.013097336,0.00056600524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005724904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076755823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005715714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036902615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003764381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019120991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009706815","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.019","title":"The influence of involvement on the endowment effect: The moveable value function","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Endowment effect; Loss aversion; Moderation; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Endowment; Function (biology); Economics; Negativity effect; Prospect theory; Arousal; Risk-seeking; Microeconomics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06578126432249025,"score_gpt":0.40464076763814,"score_spread":0.33885950331564973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009706815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958586,0.00003849275,0.001646156,0.000054651657,0.000002939105,0.0000056170597,0.000019478177,0.000007983389,0.0023661507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996605,0.0000073147485,0.00017202795,0.0000044151607,0.0000018423548,0.0000020131065,0.0000066914645,0.0000031750328,0.00014201319],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993337,0.00043298714,0.00002138102,0.000073331365,0.00007894702,0.000059610305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9616645,0.03333856,0.0021382377,0.0012936592,0.00051723054,0.0010478004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017784263,0.00026357232,0.00029780593,0.00033623772,0.00020946468,0.001372355,0.00020277128,0.00042677586,0.006088417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016254945,0.00013514307,0.00025661246,0.0002219795,0.00082271785,0.00077507336,0.0006355827,0.00073515694,0.00023989858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013533627,0.0026914494,0.7282323,0.00022542279,0.0004926998,0.0014258835,0.002151338,0.026505357,0.14524104,0.026046567,0.00065943785,0.052794877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011802802,0.0010291571,0.92792666,0.000026177211,0.00022169591,0.0004136547,0.0005316966,0.042987287,0.011339248,0.014705871,0.0006433867,0.000057193956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005124093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002308846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006088417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025837962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012181455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020367742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010899313","doi":"10.1016/s0165-4896(99)00055-4","title":"Separable and additive representations of binary gambles of gains","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Separable space; Representation (politics); Differentiable function; Monotonic function; Mathematics; Binary number; Additive function; Rank (graph theory); Consistency (knowledge bases); Function (biology); Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics; Combinatorics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.2351220511006282,"score_gpt":0.4872952272806448,"score_spread":0.25217317618001656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010899313","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09472302,0.0006371085,0.88407433,0.0010637323,0.00011821039,0.00006414361,0.00047129666,0.00019584081,0.01865241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83390886,0.0008484399,0.15050848,0.0002258739,0.00019637143,0.0002476461,0.0005212372,0.000092856484,0.013450239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693584,0.00139635,0.00017955678,0.00044412553,0.0006924188,0.00035175498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909566,0.0058067623,0.0010405304,0.0010049536,0.0007521309,0.00043901982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003429865,0.0011362588,0.0009833135,0.002192851,0.00043569287,0.005715153,0.0017270525,0.0017082756,0.008433752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01971528,0.00070624234,0.0012176365,0.0016700061,0.0018117385,0.008063372,0.0022529392,0.0026090331,0.00094840216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008837518,0.000054664055,0.00046710228,0.000067895184,0.000028674096,0.000049593276,0.00026876276,0.009968113,0.00075502216,0.96806026,0.0006221986,0.019569298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012334651,0.00002790376,0.000548322,0.000034228822,0.00002360781,0.00007017467,0.000069635804,0.07159734,0.00027695711,0.9265992,0.0007200254,0.00002020886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007997539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086327095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008433752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010300924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069638627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02821374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011424025","doi":"10.1080/00036840500392391","title":"The prevalence of hyperbolic discounting: some European evidence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Banca d'Italia","keywords":"Hyperbolic discounting; Economics; Matching (statistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Household income; Econometrics; Discounting; Mathematics; Geography; Statistics","score_opus":0.0970031242518656,"score_gpt":0.3340430994324108,"score_spread":0.2370399751805452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011424025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8942499,0.034867782,0.006339569,0.0037522917,0.0001254053,0.00006147325,0.0012057852,0.000026405702,0.059371457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99258024,0.00476989,0.0007250567,0.00077814533,0.00009420009,0.000011651137,0.00039187353,0.00001648116,0.000632469],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860443,0.00885853,0.0012948018,0.002225256,0.0011370537,0.00044012093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7401415,0.1931568,0.029374857,0.029394578,0.0065981704,0.0013341344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040782657,0.000415786,0.00069167337,0.0020647577,0.00049613905,0.0026987405,0.0017758707,0.0015621426,0.012074114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09407912,0.00040959968,0.0006940518,0.0028281922,0.004751336,0.002157116,0.001964193,0.0010976348,0.0007926448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006724212,0.00070744735,0.7283415,0.002071699,0.0025308512,0.00059544755,0.0071051875,0.0011591336,0.0008918682,0.05776861,0.0034440851,0.18865997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044486744,0.0008433917,0.9186566,0.002454459,0.0014564992,0.0022058405,0.004668651,0.0024742524,0.0029174967,0.025400331,0.038326327,0.00015130434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050969976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015358648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040782657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088738883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032383698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21568191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012021772","doi":"10.7771/1932-6246.1119","title":"Book Review of Rosenhouse, The Monty Hall Problem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Problem Solving","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.09142991047685242,"score_gpt":0.37379934551963934,"score_spread":0.2823694350427869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012021772","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039170348,0.6396257,0.0040885843,0.17843746,0.041456647,0.00003999336,0.0004632655,0.0001204047,0.13537617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011402542,0.52341765,0.005737688,0.06091098,0.068424225,0.00010946935,0.00077545596,0.00032204267,0.3289],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989737,0.0002444298,0.00006303314,0.0001517647,0.00051672454,0.000050342514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688536,0.0015979928,0.00011976023,0.00012022093,0.001096051,0.00018054064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017370699,0.0007952478,0.0010178365,0.0026574754,0.0011021664,0.002838107,0.0011483988,0.0029802378,0.022298241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071958113,0.00047552172,0.0005618511,0.004300958,0.0025056885,0.004512189,0.0010064773,0.0051090927,0.013203617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007762299,0.000013180387,0.000026147067,0.00014026817,0.0000039707847,0.000012564609,0.000023036579,0.00018170236,0.000024592804,0.030336425,0.9341293,0.03510102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060248617,0.0000052581313,0.0001059753,0.00019540137,0.0000030576077,0.000037628462,0.000019451052,0.00008323651,0.000021550462,0.021803098,0.97771317,0.00000613385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008769185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013078009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022298241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038070611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043633142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074595094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012493037","doi":"10.1037//0278-7393.26.1.28","title":"Probability judgment in three-category classification learning.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Subadditivity; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Context (archaeology); Context effect; Set (abstract data type); Cognition; Counterintuitive; Social psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.20659909491471232,"score_gpt":0.4234373883273,"score_spread":0.21683829341258767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012493037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98557615,0.00020318008,0.009759408,0.0002398338,0.000023667993,0.000040026123,0.000040656712,0.00003906795,0.0040780283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99621034,0.00005760741,0.0032667525,0.0000622678,0.000009687914,0.000017513896,0.00004183158,0.000005021128,0.00032896057],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690056,0.0013813736,0.00018835755,0.0003978343,0.0009779882,0.0001539561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9577036,0.030273322,0.006226433,0.0031085643,0.0012928504,0.0013952821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006552627,0.00041753083,0.00037114037,0.00038760874,0.0002804221,0.0011680089,0.00040170422,0.0010083521,0.002542511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06124143,0.00032742755,0.00027325857,0.00027321375,0.0013921347,0.0019814596,0.0010126623,0.0012029662,0.00039917638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014907209,0.003304802,0.36213025,0.00070389506,0.0005403213,0.00079641625,0.005693411,0.013091117,0.1438319,0.030586071,0.0026675458,0.42174706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005535359,0.005110371,0.6535526,0.00010837567,0.0003291178,0.001777154,0.0015029012,0.091442995,0.06560895,0.17524596,0.0045322916,0.00023577632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049440196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042515728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006552627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037214955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027091353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03465396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013222865","doi":"10.1111/1468-5876.00194","title":"Solutions For Some Dynamic Problems With Uncertainty Aversion","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Economic Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Operator (biology); Mathematical economics; Choquet integral; Investment (military); Risk aversion (psychology); Ambiguity aversion; Loss aversion; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical optimization; Econometrics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.12817197489065418,"score_gpt":0.3835525774052029,"score_spread":0.2553806025145487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013222865","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060574967,0.009794383,0.8490638,0.009431473,0.0011533684,0.00020926332,0.00041861265,0.0001268491,0.06922722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60788685,0.014530017,0.3192488,0.0010710026,0.0015400773,0.0009153178,0.00090056646,0.0001699899,0.053737435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957186,0.0001669443,0.00003260514,0.00007642538,0.000082735685,0.000069404436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988225,0.0007640113,0.00013346436,0.000042461805,0.00016329423,0.000074333206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014153543,0.00093157473,0.00090598856,0.0012193774,0.0008183596,0.0017608779,0.0010406852,0.0023507793,0.006676444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007459655,0.00054006407,0.0012679333,0.0011439855,0.000892724,0.0019164279,0.0014742778,0.0019247961,0.0004089306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006402432,0.00007435775,0.00039638375,0.00044516305,0.00007242919,0.00018164158,0.00021847645,0.14411692,0.00038786992,0.79161054,0.011814651,0.050617546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060590028,0.00003154637,0.00024717886,0.00010288198,0.000049849026,0.00008953882,0.00013150288,0.20205557,0.00019358416,0.7856083,0.011403442,0.000026054027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021682954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011952803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006676444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007673578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012286128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022334874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013660131","doi":"10.1002/bdm.683","title":"A choice prediction competition: Choices from experience and from description","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":340,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Harvard Business School; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Stochastic game; Competition (biology); Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Baseline (sea); Econometrics; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Economics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Political science","score_opus":0.1433559998342561,"score_gpt":0.42074730310549663,"score_spread":0.2773913032712405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013660131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9039595,0.0010931761,0.07238432,0.0059163645,0.0004340772,0.0006435065,0.0015196584,0.00016816921,0.013881101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9538118,0.00017795397,0.038155578,0.0010608535,0.00014861325,0.0005367916,0.0018757877,0.000077680226,0.0041548954],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838611,0.012223504,0.0005106319,0.0015283359,0.0014630595,0.0004134174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8272174,0.15269718,0.0039342595,0.009174422,0.0037323562,0.0032444226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024363115,0.00090918766,0.0020756104,0.0008029217,0.0013741866,0.0034258266,0.0020959757,0.0029260474,0.0060009384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08551706,0.00061849435,0.0012564043,0.00089781533,0.0020480782,0.004387214,0.00309757,0.005014967,0.00072324194],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.029150713,0.013299494,0.07284096,0.0017800475,0.0018088302,0.0009224233,0.0043631615,0.19795878,0.010494867,0.18416336,0.08540213,0.39781526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037810458,0.0048455554,0.040066842,0.00028055193,0.0002876664,0.00026371985,0.0015575559,0.70354253,0.008171204,0.2122358,0.024331028,0.00063643465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032671061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037747533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024363115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020582618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014257547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12884599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014518776","doi":"10.3758/bf03194383","title":"Is probability matching smart? Associations between probabilistic choices and cognitive ability","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Heuristics; Probabilistic logic; Matching (statistics); Psychology; Task (project management); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Interpretation (philosophy); Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.17002629189211088,"score_gpt":0.39274179217563027,"score_spread":0.22271550028351939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014518776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926157,0.00017628516,0.002462799,0.001068801,0.00002119399,0.000008917,0.000105405314,0.000021403894,0.0035195386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99901307,0.000063351836,0.00057383586,0.00008169249,0.000025571862,0.0000045955417,0.00004562992,0.0000066841662,0.00018541586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765766,0.0008412483,0.00033791555,0.00049768947,0.00042198884,0.00024353413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8651359,0.09314885,0.023636129,0.0126998685,0.0024984223,0.0028808063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068419892,0.0003360531,0.00065934344,0.0013627568,0.0002601145,0.0028534445,0.0008679876,0.0019947875,0.008162238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1027781,0.0006441352,0.00062875525,0.0010990744,0.00222813,0.005796286,0.0013552726,0.0015440565,0.0007723332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022274451,0.00081307295,0.8932821,0.00019523132,0.0012606194,0.0005421187,0.0014714694,0.00792532,0.0041789,0.025753284,0.0011573524,0.06119313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017380586,0.0005352801,0.66853034,0.000042653075,0.0003687732,0.0011288509,0.0009880482,0.022949865,0.0019217661,0.3021961,0.0010355746,0.00012896929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005419119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041344357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008162238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022240766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035926196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03618431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014960425","doi":"10.1002/bdm.583","title":"Subjective valuation and asymmetrical motivational systems: implications of scope insensitivity for decision making","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Université Laval","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Feeling; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Scope (computer science); Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.18786858322453592,"score_gpt":0.47161238862498295,"score_spread":0.283743805400447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014960425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99266714,0.00007728458,0.0042183395,0.00014539377,0.000005765239,0.000016267226,0.000028433957,0.00000997571,0.0028313044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993926,0.000015174604,0.0005018412,0.000028440338,0.0000042139154,0.0000042884876,0.000009462432,0.0000019201925,0.000042039752],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843997,0.0006213917,0.00012546885,0.00021723653,0.00047392564,0.000121987716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97857076,0.013638814,0.003767638,0.0023491718,0.000692747,0.0009809579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032480084,0.00031735445,0.00031441698,0.00073527533,0.00017826416,0.0011887063,0.00028846395,0.00040815593,0.0019327641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01864573,0.00021911925,0.00028956254,0.00024160522,0.0020458505,0.00077543384,0.0013339384,0.00094966125,0.000080538026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004199537,0.00101283,0.6061827,0.00035248208,0.0005981535,0.0017335246,0.004061087,0.010365385,0.23223534,0.044417847,0.0003981553,0.09444295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010751141,0.0006092592,0.92462504,0.00005022186,0.000097467804,0.0010417885,0.0005569014,0.012983221,0.016142132,0.043356802,0.0003587564,0.00007094714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035988173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002218475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032480084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030764862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020047283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017177284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015104885","doi":"10.1037/a0030518","title":"Optimal weighting of costs and probabilities in a risky motor decision-making task requires experience.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Weighting; Task (project management); Selection (genetic algorithm); Point (geometry); Stochastic game; Event (particle physics); Statistics; Clinical endpoint; Computer science; Psychology; Econometrics; Mathematics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Randomized controlled trial","score_opus":0.09468109097173782,"score_gpt":0.45230257292173215,"score_spread":0.3576214819499943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015104885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97347087,0.000111883375,0.024434542,0.00006754581,0.000008116174,0.000019883102,0.0000138841515,0.00002126163,0.0018519787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937704,0.00006330181,0.0059540416,0.000015314408,0.0000037432349,0.000010688632,0.00002158072,0.000006934098,0.00015401976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984458,0.00066348666,0.00010192185,0.00027116478,0.000391636,0.00012613907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99006546,0.0067102103,0.0016815587,0.0006463946,0.00038262224,0.00051381526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026324152,0.00044019884,0.00047264667,0.000418278,0.00026736045,0.0018113408,0.00034409328,0.000804376,0.0012933096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025162753,0.00050271896,0.0003874037,0.00024866406,0.00075695274,0.0018611655,0.0010004906,0.0008454616,0.00018165905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040562423,0.0014998803,0.39391765,0.0007320957,0.0011328122,0.0014839522,0.007032356,0.11661843,0.19666572,0.031210689,0.0009193753,0.24473077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019594176,0.0028154557,0.58573306,0.0001248931,0.00028611647,0.0009616184,0.0021961834,0.29123834,0.01727572,0.097355105,0.0015366677,0.00028091262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010572004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012340342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026324152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004391548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047718428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013921678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015135931","doi":"10.4236/ojpsych.2013.31005","title":"Variation in the &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;DRD2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; gene affects impulsivity in intertemporal choice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Journal of Psychiatry","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Impulsivity; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Dopaminergic; Intertemporal choice; Dopamine receptor D2; Delay discounting; Psychology; Neuroeconomics; Discounting; Internal medicine; Endocrinology; Dopamine; Genetics; Biology; Medicine; Gene; Economics; Developmental psychology; Econometrics; Genotype; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.11457674586613241,"score_gpt":0.4089607049941456,"score_spread":0.2943839591280132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015135931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987532,0.00022009907,0.00032027494,0.000057319274,0.000007798956,0.00000455351,0.00025453264,0.000006908563,0.000375244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990723,0.00006746207,0.00030704786,0.000029752619,0.000007568392,0.000006019219,0.00013967832,0.000005082506,0.0003650274],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997718,0.00006098195,0.000021609661,0.000095296935,0.000031041913,0.000019365641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964666,0.000093607305,0.00016510283,0.000026151925,0.000020426683,0.00004819672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034065027,0.0005259642,0.00025726066,0.00033566103,0.00020436442,0.00041651353,0.00022881692,0.00032719196,0.0029716867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061879185,0.00017088109,0.00031813662,0.00038549816,0.00028964068,0.00011514399,0.00017750666,0.00032782363,0.00020710973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044157123,0.00028454038,0.9133833,0.000111430694,0.0007593321,0.0018248404,0.0004269716,0.00055969006,0.065708,0.000396695,0.00064517104,0.011484461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006582743,0.00022069742,0.9937004,0.000015978045,0.00023491752,0.0013643659,0.00008058257,0.0009851509,0.0026290151,0.0002244191,0.00046466183,0.00001406913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002743272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017864777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029716867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018438592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001043837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00994128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015261885","doi":"10.1177/0963721413480172","title":"The Common Currency of Psychological Distance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Directions in Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Distancing; Social distance; Construal level theory; Psychology; Construct (python library); Social psychology; Common currency; Cognitive psychology; Currency; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Computer science","score_opus":0.23367826120475063,"score_gpt":0.538267310469019,"score_spread":0.30458904926426833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015261885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28712183,0.007254272,0.15105481,0.03871333,0.001078784,0.00013544183,0.0002804879,0.0001728705,0.5141882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98661983,0.0008905315,0.008573085,0.0007686576,0.00019476638,0.00004622914,0.00005973226,0.000053213676,0.0027939775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99030066,0.004017003,0.0005971507,0.0021117455,0.0023314937,0.0006418956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856324,0.0064037917,0.0016520998,0.0028915366,0.0021272781,0.0012928694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055971313,0.0004975586,0.0009252051,0.0026064112,0.0027985561,0.011784438,0.0016339677,0.0033202006,0.008842623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037881825,0.00048076856,0.00056535215,0.0020144025,0.024855165,0.01668044,0.008094244,0.0037341535,0.0006841182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057476896,0.000023711618,0.0022750818,0.00010796166,0.00004540488,0.00011992315,0.004158613,0.00068098365,0.00040970414,0.9732869,0.0011031855,0.017731026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016148704,0.000032689666,0.0030739547,0.00008792019,0.000019254101,0.00014602956,0.0026136504,0.00094127486,0.00019494603,0.9812587,0.011583396,0.00003214955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020831383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013541139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011784438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029234246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015677059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0296008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015391868","doi":"10.1080/09297040600762701","title":"Developmental and Gender Differences in Future-Oriented Decision-Making During the Preschool Period","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Child Neuropsychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Task (project management); Developmental psychology; Period (music); Deck","score_opus":0.040883355866788255,"score_gpt":0.33120695763893493,"score_spread":0.29032360177214667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015391868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993297,0.0001535574,0.000030757816,0.000011298444,0.0000028609309,0.0000027661451,0.000091989175,0.0000021807325,0.00037497826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989802,0.000148764,0.00012739115,0.000012738234,0.000001838478,0.000008655545,0.0001572129,0.0000025957595,0.0005605203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999759,0.000028332117,0.000019409472,0.000053728978,0.000062916144,0.00007662668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986519,0.00041667811,0.0004395543,0.00008395747,0.00018479518,0.0002231548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009159031,0.0002772485,0.00043665833,0.0007597249,0.00026477853,0.00070767576,0.00018064858,0.00025179173,0.0016038371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033316095,0.0002735495,0.00020743524,0.00033945986,0.000466982,0.00034060612,0.0003582993,0.0004961381,0.00026604024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015392979,0.00052282226,0.93488914,0.00006775133,0.00005257231,0.0014052781,0.008226246,0.00018941227,0.027704826,0.00040376265,0.0003728449,0.024626117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059066783,0.00017819682,0.9977356,0.000007848058,0.000008465325,0.0002419876,0.00068371376,0.000046273726,0.000714506,0.00009823044,0.00027273904,0.0000065951285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008709206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012266502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008709206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004340167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003483247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017316997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015569424","doi":"10.1080/13669870802579798","title":"Pleasure in decision‐making situations: politics and gambling","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Psychology; Politics; Set (abstract data type); Dimension (graph theory); Social psychology; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.39443930843170166,"score_gpt":0.5694844779745664,"score_spread":0.1750451695428647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015569424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99564075,0.00018720193,0.0005420346,0.000083674866,0.000007438461,0.000010966191,0.00001255186,0.0000021974047,0.0035130891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951303,0.000064145854,0.00020663887,0.000022968436,0.0000068791123,0.0000053868966,0.0000102152835,0.0000012858634,0.00016939812],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990689,0.0005014111,0.000035707108,0.000090170055,0.00018693777,0.00011684285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944906,0.0028225183,0.0014237846,0.00024279738,0.00016436173,0.00085591146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012901851,0.00022438726,0.00032386478,0.00046847117,0.00050896243,0.0026997123,0.00022558018,0.0004536577,0.0027304396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068993345,0.0002712423,0.00030096938,0.00029669533,0.001398087,0.0006863225,0.0008994549,0.00067444664,0.00017163387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017799467,0.0025160443,0.8970811,0.00040915605,0.00034615464,0.00078721304,0.01302902,0.0013520236,0.01896639,0.006187016,0.00046553306,0.057080448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042985364,0.00066698616,0.9880194,0.000033561493,0.00005656601,0.00033732897,0.0033533804,0.0013186587,0.0008621356,0.004489048,0.00077909185,0.000040900715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006375302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013182925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027304396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046404227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032940385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009134173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016146995","doi":"","title":"Risky social choice with approximate interpersonal comparisons of well-being","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Preference; Interpersonal communication; Social planner; Social welfare function; Mathematical economics; Social choice theory; Order (exchange); Von Neumann architecture; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology; Expected utility hypothesis; Welfare; Economics; Microeconomics; Statistics","score_opus":0.044917903870073855,"score_gpt":0.3019552545627112,"score_spread":0.25703735069263733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016146995","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2996606,0.00041975963,0.6634859,0.005026134,0.000080332786,0.00012860155,0.00062890607,0.00008695188,0.030482814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96365476,0.00022192513,0.029675497,0.00013722808,0.000052227213,0.00020538308,0.0001474482,0.000012047962,0.0058934223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723345,0.0018386866,0.000056740708,0.00034591748,0.00030399818,0.00022123764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954927,0.0028127546,0.00069688086,0.00039468866,0.00019646363,0.00040652847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003636619,0.00093013,0.0010708501,0.00062593404,0.0005091235,0.0024892136,0.0016675347,0.0015877405,0.004936062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008650105,0.0004669974,0.0010074894,0.00072839705,0.0025300558,0.003746921,0.0018423278,0.0019233925,0.00035735557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010202356,0.00007995887,0.0011990176,0.000044299115,0.00005553912,0.0001618555,0.00024491502,0.21430013,0.00025867368,0.77870196,0.0005383783,0.004313336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004059285,0.000076042816,0.0005612647,0.000015610362,0.000017019272,0.000049012117,0.00008298246,0.46230507,0.000070796326,0.53603274,0.0007266531,0.000022295886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017787082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015741879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004936062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002153668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094004464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019232452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016720004","doi":"10.1177/154193121005400415","title":"Decision Strategy Types and Situation-Contingent Selection Mechanisms: A Review and Some Field Data","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Decision analysis; Computer science; Decision engineering; Business decision mapping; Optimal decision; Management science; Decision field theory; Decision model; Decision support system; Decision problem; Selection (genetic algorithm); Situational ethics; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Decision tree; Machine learning; Psychology; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.12500911088303296,"score_gpt":0.38746008594372755,"score_spread":0.2624509750606946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016720004","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046643143,0.99840933,0.00027001405,0.00013424791,0.000026272699,0.000013054529,0.00002150057,0.0000038414555,0.0006552874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0043732887,0.99468565,0.0005665242,0.00012655194,0.000043482527,0.00002806201,0.00003853154,0.0000020375799,0.00013588402],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856466,0.0003941952,0.00027837328,0.00027703718,0.00041805685,0.00006763923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98846495,0.009228996,0.001035054,0.00015400462,0.0009689367,0.00014798972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003670468,0.0011213415,0.0030487739,0.005793101,0.00035325062,0.00222196,0.001849269,0.0015221584,0.0027349333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008431072,0.0005401562,0.0010450429,0.007246613,0.001436605,0.0029985555,0.00065096916,0.0012068093,0.0010528002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019272965,0.00011501984,0.0015948453,0.042908926,0.0004104236,0.00014880003,0.00023128331,0.0004887604,0.00036998428,0.004114349,0.0048560225,0.9445688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023636445,0.0009953212,0.029166382,0.07669727,0.003458576,0.007325057,0.0016864621,0.0009514174,0.0018957155,0.02198134,0.8553519,0.00025414658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023321607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003132378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005793101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013394991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002162287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019411504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017092729","doi":"10.3758/bf03196483","title":"Syllogistic reasoning time: Disconfirmation disconfirmed","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Syllogism; Premise; Psychology; Deductive reasoning; Psychology of reasoning; Cognitive psychology; Verbal reasoning; Cognition; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09815062896328869,"score_gpt":0.4042266667219603,"score_spread":0.3060760377586716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017092729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8045959,0.008699381,0.077070355,0.024336956,0.002378095,0.00035160224,0.0015391371,0.00071673415,0.08031175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98130155,0.0014161695,0.01132045,0.0012013115,0.0004369318,0.000063693566,0.0005933599,0.00014319441,0.0035233735],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99226826,0.0026671689,0.00058088196,0.0014139111,0.002802874,0.00026693355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6365492,0.284289,0.024320403,0.027033078,0.025210397,0.0025978596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018212447,0.00032181523,0.00061748014,0.0016057754,0.0006732181,0.0024313976,0.002151939,0.0012599216,0.01841037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23776457,0.00033655422,0.0006541462,0.0012275857,0.0016359331,0.0047649224,0.0010036095,0.0028976488,0.0019089917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015374383,0.0012279776,0.13708493,0.0019440047,0.0008755975,0.0012888438,0.0045028897,0.0032932628,0.018775823,0.11141264,0.020147618,0.68407214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001988057,0.0014401721,0.30717248,0.0011609758,0.0017085667,0.004260424,0.0034896815,0.052859794,0.0607234,0.50352496,0.061411995,0.00025950986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018673918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002257639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01841037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022114802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002257972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09631783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017240459","doi":"10.3109/10826084.2012.705685","title":"Is Addiction a Failure of Rationality?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Substance Use & Misuse","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Commodity; Addiction; Consumption (sociology); Rationality; Luck; Economics; Market failure; Microeconomics; Government (linguistics); Positive economics; Public economics; Psychology; Market economy; Sociology; Political science; Psychiatry; Law","score_opus":0.2272857588072667,"score_gpt":0.411040235686017,"score_spread":0.1837544768787503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017240459","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14762923,0.011469568,0.102642804,0.51146847,0.00219015,0.00011119711,0.0001982106,0.00027162585,0.22401878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9596452,0.004479312,0.0074808043,0.017327292,0.0010382142,0.00007473823,0.00003631216,0.00005553867,0.00986261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99498343,0.0017098178,0.00022798973,0.00083938066,0.0012010417,0.0010383528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844789,0.009394965,0.002032166,0.0018246403,0.0013262917,0.0009430121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008178177,0.0004107485,0.0012850398,0.0010585358,0.001253729,0.005084109,0.0015975793,0.003833955,0.0032357848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013774291,0.00034825265,0.0010433432,0.0007802474,0.032732382,0.006985775,0.0035442763,0.0065371804,0.0006371597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038386675,0.000050016504,0.0031262627,0.00008339214,0.00005917698,0.00036365303,0.0015758292,0.0009606989,0.00025933393,0.97785175,0.003854103,0.011777337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012322426,0.000036812467,0.0010406283,0.000063590465,0.000011676123,0.00024403539,0.0006004641,0.0010643953,0.00014983313,0.98252016,0.014232693,0.000023408222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038060597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001846916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008178177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023004636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032322633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04325086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018329894","doi":"10.3758/bf03193584","title":"Confidence and accuracy in deductive reasoning","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Syllogism; Deliberation; Heuristic; Cognitive psychology; Self-confidence; Function (biology); Metacognition; Contrast (vision); Cognition; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08557876263758146,"score_gpt":0.38471391691217405,"score_spread":0.2991351542745926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018329894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94933724,0.0030696162,0.03473084,0.0022839315,0.00012854187,0.000032142176,0.00015615065,0.00007615351,0.0101854345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966815,0.00030336753,0.0022962836,0.000088956454,0.00009758092,0.000012381532,0.00007011105,0.000022221073,0.00042765873],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927746,0.003202801,0.0007453616,0.000994325,0.0017619296,0.00052098336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4031313,0.56382084,0.013043973,0.011351425,0.0066492283,0.0020031987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01875307,0.0005895144,0.0011417256,0.002124569,0.0005595293,0.005742063,0.0015083331,0.00277515,0.005294243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32861835,0.0010606025,0.0010300478,0.0018706502,0.0040347134,0.01130251,0.0021192953,0.0036664703,0.0004922694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008792504,0.0023286843,0.3870051,0.0008938826,0.0015054586,0.001094869,0.0069393325,0.09914881,0.0028574604,0.29313117,0.0023419624,0.1939608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031869946,0.00039754316,0.08238387,0.00011699156,0.0002398703,0.0005181634,0.0005627709,0.11765533,0.0017938843,0.7952124,0.0006749133,0.00012561983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021759826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010885296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01875307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010767494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082959945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09917688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019406163","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.009","title":"You can’t always get what you want: The motivational effect of need on risk-sensitive decision-making","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Risk-seeking; Social psychology; Irrational number; Risk aversion (psychology); Expected utility hypothesis; Economics","score_opus":0.05784026192484497,"score_gpt":0.44220946422586266,"score_spread":0.3843692023010177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019406163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896555,0.00018662859,0.00081453845,0.0012450713,0.000027697753,0.00001711275,0.000024767918,0.000008804162,0.008019947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981515,0.000112278256,0.0010181468,0.00022429123,0.00002148946,0.000017820113,0.000016241127,0.00001768157,0.00042054127],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884725,0.00062040734,0.00003709799,0.000115859,0.00026978183,0.00010955259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98251003,0.01281883,0.0014002227,0.00085991446,0.00050490955,0.0019060686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029025795,0.00025207183,0.0003774648,0.0005041723,0.0006382825,0.0019319105,0.00042023294,0.0012416265,0.0066868053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019153606,0.00049252284,0.0002954688,0.00030509869,0.0014045734,0.0016673917,0.0010929295,0.0022043588,0.00028405205],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.030161807,0.02853135,0.35555512,0.0018551195,0.001187893,0.0019629118,0.02551439,0.009502286,0.17007598,0.10929931,0.009205863,0.257148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012697364,0.003249217,0.82755464,0.00016365512,0.000763392,0.0009211841,0.0044048335,0.019860683,0.0069448166,0.1306023,0.004007276,0.00025824568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009758789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014784442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066868053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040456903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006271815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022369623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019569350","doi":"10.1109/itsc.2006.1706823","title":"Modeling Driver Psychological Deliberation During Dynamic Route Selection Processes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Computer science; Process (computing); Representation (politics); Dissemination; Field (mathematics); Management science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.08425027100821553,"score_gpt":0.39873464016649096,"score_spread":0.31448436915827543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019569350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9173534,0.00007674435,0.0757731,0.00031732372,0.0000129119235,0.00008189917,0.000114269715,0.0000381542,0.006232219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939744,0.000055315188,0.0051279427,0.000010939687,0.000004048642,0.000047079353,0.000037184527,0.0000031965083,0.00073997956],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995815,0.00022549427,0.000013095208,0.000064187945,0.000040213556,0.000075568874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726725,0.0021457244,0.00026711318,0.00009700917,0.000106264575,0.00011665417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012123159,0.00033768715,0.00025921038,0.00035696127,0.00033549467,0.0013424258,0.000497199,0.0008890125,0.002177443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057495567,0.00026476439,0.00047843155,0.0003446849,0.00062377314,0.0010250395,0.0007543708,0.0006882036,0.000161919],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005277401,0.00042997522,0.028763607,0.000095845106,0.0001148289,0.00036821933,0.0028252164,0.88079345,0.003050169,0.06846435,0.000393991,0.014172657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025290874,0.00007428816,0.0032019804,0.0000048448715,0.000015168775,0.000021158015,0.0003558027,0.98727757,0.00021273475,0.008500954,0.0002957041,0.000014568731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009009727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049263122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009009727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009853547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011745135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017914534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020045420","doi":"10.3390/jintelligence2010008","title":"Assessing Cognitive Abilities: Intelligence and More","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligence","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Rationality; Construct (python library); Cognition; Psychology; Dual (grammatical number); Dual process theory (moral psychology); Cognitive psychology; Process (computing); Ecological rationality; Cognitive science; Rational analysis; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.2266708241467239,"score_gpt":0.4726964524896948,"score_spread":0.24602562834297087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020045420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30751058,0.2697033,0.14088562,0.052291952,0.0053518643,0.0004663469,0.002262821,0.00086984143,0.22065766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8718744,0.04351579,0.06358687,0.008757067,0.003259535,0.00033738374,0.0009952033,0.00010413167,0.0075695943],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99379164,0.0018667573,0.00093651493,0.0007374804,0.0024064735,0.0002611688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98470926,0.0067080185,0.003477929,0.001791627,0.0022234134,0.0010897693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064095883,0.0017546377,0.0013034516,0.0073642293,0.00075064576,0.0073121795,0.001216943,0.0024288588,0.003814882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027787669,0.00036929798,0.0008227454,0.0047589946,0.0073341215,0.012016088,0.0036796504,0.0029049292,0.00065175904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042297287,0.00056840136,0.094273746,0.0030631218,0.00079104,0.00046196562,0.007829721,0.0039055524,0.0033196656,0.27123892,0.009510135,0.6046147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081512146,0.00083952287,0.14908038,0.0032411623,0.00051225006,0.0019948331,0.0040132133,0.003871467,0.0018818603,0.7581751,0.07593994,0.0003687933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028252404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001684621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073642293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010788984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001268928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03389752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021544558","doi":"10.1037/xge0000049","title":"Disfluent fonts don’t help people solve math problems.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Counterintuitive; Pooling; Font; CLARITY; Replicate; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Cognition; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.33698835825116236,"score_gpt":0.5406556207180131,"score_spread":0.20366726246685074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021544558","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020533535,0.99074066,0.0005620118,0.0007946324,0.0001678691,0.000011633492,0.00007547226,0.000036945614,0.0055573815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033438172,0.9579225,0.0017121354,0.0017233988,0.00035818422,0.000045427056,0.00024810384,0.000039467857,0.0045124986],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991787,0.00024190951,0.00009962536,0.00015002336,0.00028053217,0.00004930858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99574214,0.0029656729,0.0006758871,0.00015228146,0.00034955313,0.00011443532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012441173,0.00061727356,0.0011158654,0.00091555185,0.00026386903,0.0017781758,0.00096939405,0.0015636462,0.008268387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006083346,0.00025830325,0.0009494369,0.0008687616,0.00073466636,0.0016465238,0.0005938986,0.0010809833,0.003238899],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023770028,0.000103504826,0.0009768135,0.018227743,0.00040377377,0.00011660723,0.00011605408,0.00012504632,0.0021606095,0.002720564,0.018484477,0.95632714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028535747,0.0009159576,0.02543553,0.019367767,0.0017470217,0.0040213913,0.00034576154,0.00027443896,0.0067138975,0.012276164,0.92853963,0.00007694237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009209772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017481578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008268387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037581316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006955959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02766049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023548979","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1601_6","title":"Malleable Mental Accounting: The Effect of Flexibility on the Justification of Attractive Spending and Consumption Decisions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Colorado Boulder","keywords":"Mental accounting; Flexibility (engineering); Ambiguity; Consumption (sociology); Control (management); Construct (python library); Process (computing); Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Accounting; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.19941157557364297,"score_gpt":0.4636348922484119,"score_spread":0.26422331667476895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023548979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98275983,0.00014738273,0.0024244052,0.00066477095,0.000016508011,0.000031074407,0.00005782599,0.00003531786,0.013862874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983138,0.00004662054,0.0010629983,0.000104310035,0.00001074092,0.000014101179,0.000043909316,0.000016809277,0.00038677675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969247,0.0017648055,0.00017555403,0.00041654872,0.00047099576,0.00024743399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86326617,0.10290761,0.017760301,0.010880507,0.0014806888,0.0037047432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004624184,0.0005713203,0.0004742165,0.0006259665,0.00091458665,0.0037691162,0.0007938694,0.0019594643,0.01091505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0939904,0.00052737584,0.0006311975,0.0006209601,0.0026986033,0.0038071033,0.0029065707,0.0033853017,0.00040120652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.026888946,0.008654155,0.38686332,0.0010426065,0.0013193552,0.002910047,0.014768881,0.054148484,0.08566181,0.18820733,0.005123532,0.2244115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012908195,0.00183015,0.6189361,0.00019838958,0.0006224753,0.0012095398,0.003430437,0.07702262,0.0069074966,0.2839152,0.0042339195,0.00040286017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001771953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015524419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01091505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011080818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007091745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03651446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024535950","doi":"10.1007/s40505-013-0009-1","title":"Eliciting beliefs by paying in chance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory Bulletin","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Public finance; Economics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Neoclassical economics; Public economics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.037965172797364444,"score_gpt":0.32763378151263245,"score_spread":0.289668608715268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024535950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9280479,0.000119425575,0.04771573,0.00074426894,0.00008568563,0.00013454708,0.00012250195,0.0001207672,0.02290911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99412006,0.000048428097,0.0046315775,0.0000634727,0.00001752408,0.0000401763,0.0000272931,0.0000071131317,0.0010443081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870205,0.00058703346,0.00007071935,0.0001746719,0.00028824713,0.00017724364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98402023,0.013037678,0.0010847157,0.0010781883,0.00031066572,0.00046857013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020772922,0.00032328418,0.00053974293,0.00024946433,0.00034086,0.0017387873,0.00036021278,0.0007717726,0.005424967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020754715,0.00023764526,0.00030580282,0.00044469733,0.0006531034,0.0012430145,0.0006881288,0.0011224588,0.00033702332],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068657906,0.0027355417,0.10730763,0.00097009033,0.00032161365,0.0009952172,0.0050047515,0.020310067,0.0844643,0.505376,0.004411716,0.26123732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006543178,0.0025497284,0.073897704,0.00015328673,0.0003966604,0.00048777414,0.0016844737,0.19777696,0.04778195,0.66848046,0.005972334,0.00016436579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006145773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009503079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005424967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004482293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005014684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018148363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024781866","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v5n8p109","title":"Optimal Investment Behavior for Regret-Averse Competitive Firms under Price Uncertainty","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Shanghai University of Finance and Economics","keywords":"Regret; Economics; Microeconomics; Risk aversion (psychology); Investment (military); Capital (architecture); Perspective (graphical); Expected utility hypothesis; Financial economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07926708993715913,"score_gpt":0.3512461151656826,"score_spread":0.27197902522852346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024781866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88980764,0.0005354379,0.09645942,0.0014004224,0.000029469775,0.00009384071,0.00015689543,0.000059675298,0.011457291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945368,0.00018015396,0.004003872,0.000055662444,0.000010763113,0.000023307151,0.0000282256,0.000005070407,0.0011561586],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929273,0.0002625281,0.000030311712,0.0001221753,0.00007133052,0.00022090411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787307,0.0011683925,0.0005208121,0.00008157274,0.0001253798,0.00023075152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013225978,0.0005128043,0.0007610317,0.00032521223,0.00042626474,0.0017774869,0.000588085,0.001469804,0.0025621804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005328133,0.00040293517,0.0004798565,0.00031326473,0.0007126066,0.001621533,0.00061137206,0.0008222579,0.00019225555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007866514,0.00044763347,0.018336467,0.00028082295,0.00022283418,0.00097289594,0.00045239695,0.80202645,0.01089398,0.13788615,0.0013684919,0.026325127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009993697,0.0003138465,0.009007165,0.00003580401,0.000060180475,0.00012451193,0.00040552675,0.91979563,0.0015869725,0.06784991,0.00067242,0.00004810161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032510322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023343673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032510322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014882634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011167937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010798216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025443246","doi":"10.1086/513041","title":"On the Perceived Value of Money: The Reference Dependence of Currency Numerosity Effects","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Numerosity adaptation effect; Anchoring; Value (mathematics); Economics; Currency; Salient; Perception; Illusion; Value for money; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Monetary economics; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Public economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.32434961425618797,"score_gpt":0.5109207354967847,"score_spread":0.18657112124059677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025443246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9373022,0.0007446675,0.018778723,0.000886258,0.00005648696,0.00010030611,0.00016506515,0.00007009083,0.041896198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950304,0.0001979069,0.003780325,0.0002106033,0.000034600424,0.000055518416,0.000095680894,0.000065026434,0.0005298536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759597,0.0010674176,0.0001315778,0.00054254866,0.000529005,0.0001335198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9017221,0.08167877,0.0049122134,0.0074422406,0.0026632997,0.001581359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006181136,0.00048991945,0.0007506938,0.0010589563,0.0004873008,0.002294889,0.0007984533,0.0013595913,0.012989581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07628181,0.00043368357,0.00055764324,0.00050840335,0.002567377,0.0045236517,0.0031232017,0.0023037724,0.00069953484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02349499,0.003137467,0.11024439,0.0014367562,0.0005132304,0.0011769407,0.013327166,0.0113242,0.28158915,0.28727418,0.003027013,0.26345462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001086705,0.0021009978,0.60471535,0.00046598536,0.0006400093,0.00097134826,0.0020216152,0.031126805,0.029150952,0.3233124,0.0040839342,0.0003238325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008722541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046060194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012989581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006725845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030320542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04345447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025902133","doi":"10.1016/j.jmp.2006.10.004","title":"A behavioral condition for Prelec's weighting function on the positive line without assuming","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Weighting; Axiom; Context (archaeology); Line (geometry); Function (biology); Mathematics; Expected utility hypothesis; Applied mathematics; Mathematical economics; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.23755183170948954,"score_gpt":0.5187104857905608,"score_spread":0.2811586540810712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025902133","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34600303,0.0001678766,0.5529821,0.006307301,0.00035133338,0.00019665434,0.00090386486,0.0009056583,0.092182174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93163,0.00012714406,0.05448422,0.00079159206,0.00019783092,0.00019537979,0.0004896792,0.00029030826,0.011793855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879444,0.00019555795,0.0000751036,0.00039471406,0.00018971018,0.00035045616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872551,0.006652586,0.0008758196,0.0016299644,0.002386898,0.0011996618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022267767,0.00060963636,0.0007624029,0.0008508016,0.00091948884,0.0015115624,0.001329196,0.0025519282,0.021450019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024727052,0.00035854225,0.00068714976,0.0005280551,0.0015911638,0.0049188165,0.0014717719,0.003050096,0.002546121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006479987,0.0002172951,0.0019007573,0.00014194842,0.000027087633,0.00031745445,0.00032490722,0.0019858463,0.02047385,0.9459801,0.004012382,0.023970319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023340365,0.0003000855,0.004867827,0.00009749841,0.000036656762,0.0007399113,0.0003147748,0.07154019,0.011447579,0.9059997,0.004346907,0.000075478005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010864504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062683277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021450019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055759196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013890192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071757436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026133119","doi":"10.1024/1662-9647/a000051","title":"Multivariate Longitudinal Modeling of Cognitive Aging","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GeroPsych","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Latent growth modeling; Multivariate statistics; Growth curve (statistics); Association (psychology); Cognition; Psychology; Longitudinal data; Structural equation modeling; Multivariate analysis; Random effects model; Longitudinal study; Statistics; Cognitive psychology; Econometrics; Developmental psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Medicine; Data mining","score_opus":0.316591569796243,"score_gpt":0.4667040383921943,"score_spread":0.15011246859595134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026133119","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24996734,0.0009549842,0.73863244,0.0017268436,0.00015105534,0.0001931399,0.004243652,0.00081614277,0.0033143747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8613373,0.0012330022,0.12284242,0.000108671076,0.000088531306,0.00078203744,0.0032232676,0.00016033868,0.010224551],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984012,0.00104745,0.00006988832,0.00021303202,0.00012630629,0.00014214683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555075,0.0028567414,0.00053322123,0.0004734957,0.0004389072,0.00014692236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006144177,0.00077008584,0.00075400464,0.001366153,0.00055211387,0.0012108675,0.0013983073,0.0007471663,0.0048598656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01398504,0.00043558903,0.001203275,0.0022018012,0.0004975003,0.0010034427,0.0013782018,0.0014797272,0.00056309864],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003639804,0.0003018482,0.12666966,0.00013875187,0.00077121914,0.00042394266,0.001213018,0.6046339,0.00083830254,0.18323475,0.004503781,0.076906756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023260462,0.000057822257,0.009846969,0.000022987342,0.000059911505,0.00006180281,0.00008916509,0.9554515,0.000112569796,0.031533513,0.0027166812,0.000023795905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044092894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03392438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044092894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010082816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013885306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08767247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026651188","doi":"10.1007/s00199-007-0260-5","title":"Utility of gambling I: entropy modified linear weighted utility","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Preference; Revealed preference; Public finance; Subjective expected utility; Term (time); Entropy (arrow of time); Economics; Mathematics; Econometrics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.16259229680610154,"score_gpt":0.4074807756393446,"score_spread":0.24488847883324305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026651188","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1579282,0.0011367014,0.82611006,0.0013115885,0.00015857037,0.00013423763,0.0004930531,0.00018910528,0.012538537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95093095,0.00039571343,0.04218253,0.00017094129,0.00014497625,0.0001240581,0.00026707843,0.00007606277,0.0057076477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977285,0.0013290243,0.00007719073,0.00033999895,0.00030245725,0.0002228698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99077994,0.006949245,0.00051263097,0.00086426083,0.00052090565,0.00037301364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038011703,0.0009206916,0.0011517095,0.0012322454,0.00028111195,0.0026447189,0.0018186253,0.001572945,0.005486763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01950018,0.0005079807,0.001016534,0.001410861,0.00213249,0.0051321387,0.0015673126,0.0018398908,0.00036419285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064422324,0.00021384741,0.0054760207,0.00026760335,0.00026911154,0.0002075682,0.00036042364,0.3033539,0.0019386389,0.62858474,0.0027477227,0.05593622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028731936,0.000117456206,0.0022420674,0.000043675143,0.000055189867,0.00011410778,0.000054346972,0.58728087,0.0004746561,0.40899363,0.0005436403,0.000051703726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014583631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010064954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005486763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021976053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007732633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02010274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027211078","doi":"10.1167/13.9.426","title":"Probability Cuing Improves Perceptual Judgments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Cued speech; Psychology; Perception; Task (project management); Tilt (camera); Orientation (vector space); Audiology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1396155848047455,"score_gpt":0.40066244794314937,"score_spread":0.26104686313840386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027211078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97381085,0.0016206437,0.017833823,0.00032119252,0.00028976344,0.000071611306,0.00014944434,0.0007283582,0.0051744026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923035,0.00033774736,0.006284728,0.00007986234,0.00005947495,0.000018522433,0.00009089402,0.00012740963,0.0006979502],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793905,0.000394831,0.00023924884,0.0005837238,0.000643443,0.00019969276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843999,0.006779806,0.00279786,0.004254708,0.0010535753,0.0007141231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016147539,0.000686243,0.0007574643,0.00034687226,0.00025172814,0.0014068928,0.00059095817,0.00091729424,0.0046658046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031040065,0.00066688564,0.00031208666,0.00027333936,0.00066374504,0.0018300287,0.0017071132,0.00088565465,0.0011295382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036140312,0.00026455533,0.010823642,0.00060672814,0.00008517107,0.00023332814,0.0005350177,0.001553707,0.88535213,0.00093245937,0.00071119337,0.09528801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007616531,0.0061720978,0.60864747,0.0002077295,0.00048615062,0.001196921,0.00035779082,0.023608278,0.34136233,0.010312157,0.006593863,0.00029353143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019863446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018407247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046658046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033375475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055917876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015608609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027566178","doi":"10.2466/07.09.cp.2.3","title":"The existence bias: a systematic replication","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comprehensive Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Status quo bias; Replication (statistics); Preference; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3984765751873719,"score_gpt":0.48357484355951325,"score_spread":0.08509826837214135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027566178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7246102,0.016496336,0.15654579,0.0041359668,0.005389679,0.058678523,0.0023986478,0.0014838923,0.030260904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89343446,0.0007813066,0.059768587,0.003659437,0.0004938497,0.038459685,0.0005373886,0.00031025175,0.0025550495],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7997499,0.13639666,0.018650798,0.025010603,0.017887725,0.0023043395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.35892057,0.38382515,0.03064734,0.18494146,0.040305212,0.0013602519],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16736303,0.0024872643,0.0034169983,0.0018182184,0.0038498992,0.0031320355,0.0036994833,0.004327615,0.007404451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44439405,0.0022851122,0.0045108655,0.0012987389,0.007966381,0.0064222976,0.004307469,0.003983914,0.0017675379],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0836793,0.020577457,0.21180898,0.05853288,0.023863383,0.0044526258,0.12608415,0.0053848624,0.06942414,0.06490254,0.019452687,0.31183708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0502639,0.052017488,0.34619975,0.01742602,0.03284396,0.004229726,0.033575073,0.0256544,0.08976978,0.16922729,0.17602181,0.0027708681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033057167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031386437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83263695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002854233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040676044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8851109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028228266","doi":"10.1002/mar.20274","title":"Leaving the store empty‐handed: Testing explanations for the too‐much‐choice effect using decision field theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychology and Marketing","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Variance (accounting); Townsend; Choice set; Quality (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Distribution (mathematics); Field (mathematics); Econometrics; Social psychology; Economics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1785591740851731,"score_gpt":0.4808777904796224,"score_spread":0.30231861639444935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028228266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889235,0.000059686674,0.00681929,0.00019083258,0.000017176635,0.000058453126,0.000056313627,0.000016441096,0.0038583004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977592,0.000026843412,0.0018672557,0.00008691056,0.000011343281,0.00004138995,0.00003589525,0.000011153051,0.00015995315],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958502,0.0024199998,0.00023063166,0.0005401761,0.00074167474,0.00021725365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8164932,0.16566746,0.006974464,0.007643852,0.0015452054,0.0016758711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010257268,0.000426557,0.0008248758,0.0009779829,0.0006130382,0.0020860129,0.0010907068,0.0015410343,0.0074604913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04804295,0.00040130978,0.0010226064,0.0006631912,0.0028782685,0.0024945366,0.0016572445,0.0023068346,0.00026400996],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03033434,0.012906829,0.5201789,0.00091677374,0.0012615321,0.00097099884,0.0055851764,0.061031014,0.04442603,0.222006,0.0023755522,0.09800682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021907983,0.006229545,0.36667305,0.00011564575,0.0006960896,0.00045138402,0.0020904774,0.29233027,0.013245821,0.31335732,0.0023364304,0.00028316802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010862879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006790296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010257268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012587736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005083937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054246306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028816642","doi":"10.1509/jmkr.37.1.125.18724","title":"Are Consumer Survey Results Distorted? Systematic Impact of Behavioral Frequency and Duration on Survey Response Errors","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Duration (music); Econometrics; Telephone survey; Statistics; Homogeneous; Call duration; Scale (ratio); Non-sampling error; Survey data collection; Psychology; Audiology; Mathematics; Computer science; Marketing; Medicine; Telecommunications; Acoustics; Geography; Business","score_opus":0.37626530138169945,"score_gpt":0.5223666706228461,"score_spread":0.1461013692411467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028816642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9321241,0.0022287008,0.047424085,0.0032150578,0.0002967189,0.0005904743,0.0036491188,0.00040065707,0.010071038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98642147,0.0003855092,0.009153373,0.0011217294,0.00014871395,0.00028584944,0.001420129,0.00010286938,0.00096032146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7532469,0.16816968,0.022399409,0.013315574,0.04066591,0.0022025686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.17261422,0.6298343,0.12063306,0.0509206,0.025155302,0.0008424717],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14180626,0.0006035014,0.0009970308,0.0033580305,0.0005999757,0.0024189178,0.001018613,0.0014893564,0.0015025245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5279677,0.0007606742,0.0010853503,0.0055383416,0.0018601861,0.0021011322,0.0021565137,0.0013299318,0.0007763854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000874553,0.00010633234,0.9392519,0.00031832588,0.0008903149,0.0001317673,0.0025344237,0.0021185498,0.00082823524,0.0012446275,0.0022713381,0.049429715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053356507,0.00022612624,0.9824853,0.0001973023,0.00034642857,0.0003718352,0.0010784866,0.00699362,0.0025838087,0.0023475275,0.0032271594,0.000089122404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041756025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037521953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85819376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00152025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008168346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74995214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030031047","doi":"10.1198/tast.2009.0001","title":"Splitting a Predictor at the Upper Quarter or Third and the Lower Quarter or Third","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Statistician","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":192,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Mathematics; Statistics; Voting; Linear regression; Econometrics; Simple (philosophy); Regression analysis; Simple linear regression; Regression; Geography; Political science; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.050893470110711776,"score_gpt":0.3687126660059382,"score_spread":0.31781919589522645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030031047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79009265,0.0006841448,0.18645881,0.0016707272,0.00039448868,0.00015102586,0.0023601172,0.00066342985,0.017524643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525046,0.00025400528,0.04080117,0.00021705574,0.00008409735,0.0001374875,0.0016568651,0.00012757981,0.00421702],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973355,0.0011919495,0.00018716558,0.0004713802,0.0005425653,0.0002713832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98898727,0.0066559184,0.0009752076,0.0021130578,0.0010305699,0.0002379894],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049675102,0.0006219598,0.00093753746,0.001659823,0.0006844485,0.0016386377,0.00087534386,0.00082621706,0.011837241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026157053,0.0002520853,0.0011037261,0.0021013771,0.0015087497,0.0016726992,0.0014279737,0.0017070466,0.0034367447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022616347,0.0005331579,0.4766298,0.0003353589,0.00046800298,0.0003155851,0.0031536561,0.0134094665,0.011536101,0.044931777,0.011725364,0.43469998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015744194,0.0015184288,0.6845548,0.0003360312,0.00037098053,0.0010862903,0.008405773,0.121171154,0.020128822,0.124588676,0.03735251,0.0003290742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00429197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036117516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9950325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006500321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006070802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039599538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030299881","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2000.2881","title":"Information Processing at Successive Stages of Decision Making: Need for Cognition and Inclusion–Exclusion Effects","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Mindset; Cognition; Set (abstract data type); Information processing; Inclusion (mineral); Need for cognition; Purchasing; Quality (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Decision quality; Social psychology; Marketing; Computer science; Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0275843643319885,"score_gpt":0.3520217450133791,"score_spread":0.32443738068139055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030299881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8988278,0.0016947717,0.06675207,0.0031126796,0.0001632074,0.00021728834,0.00020772273,0.00025515584,0.028769385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878634,0.00032583557,0.010592233,0.00023541754,0.000106917025,0.00007792524,0.00009457538,0.00011320832,0.00059044093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969247,0.0011206437,0.00023041441,0.0006582824,0.00069347926,0.00037243875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69267863,0.27817988,0.007568779,0.013412046,0.004344142,0.0038165576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010988435,0.0006025996,0.0017522048,0.0017758936,0.0014922332,0.005318904,0.001603528,0.002455225,0.008771095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12627444,0.0010831445,0.001689898,0.001190969,0.0048849513,0.013025701,0.0035236997,0.0034765818,0.00032317635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.021341149,0.0046384153,0.16792606,0.0028824217,0.0018225475,0.00097397075,0.009313294,0.031255424,0.050978698,0.42730802,0.0038933002,0.27766675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091677846,0.0008292816,0.27476057,0.00017037016,0.0011115316,0.0007192803,0.0008549793,0.06969459,0.00952425,0.6393283,0.0017615141,0.00032853807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003177565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024591556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010988435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011651586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016784254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05811304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031010434","doi":"10.3758/s13421-014-0488-9","title":"Metacognition and abstract reasoning","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Inference; Task (project management); Normative; Cognitive psychology; Representation (politics); Logical reasoning; Cognition; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Mathematics education; Computer science","score_opus":0.11633257991673143,"score_gpt":0.3807593215937227,"score_spread":0.2644267416769913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031010434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7922558,0.0038119701,0.1489838,0.004474418,0.00019742642,0.00007884696,0.00039291213,0.00019402409,0.049610797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98004764,0.00086467486,0.015073655,0.0001729706,0.00009573373,0.000040890707,0.00023472434,0.000024783922,0.0034449883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987356,0.0005059149,0.00009474196,0.00027305508,0.00026343507,0.00012719852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98346764,0.010795114,0.0018481028,0.0025582206,0.00085272436,0.00047823123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022104376,0.00054810796,0.0006361958,0.0010509824,0.00036778778,0.0048657106,0.0012797951,0.0012898633,0.006827087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015931783,0.00052332383,0.0007636135,0.0009845285,0.0027668418,0.0071099745,0.0013561486,0.001990006,0.0005510345],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011999446,0.0009151094,0.025499001,0.0006416296,0.0007776672,0.00043654576,0.0016911599,0.031998668,0.006780234,0.67853063,0.0019962538,0.24953313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005872224,0.000048767157,0.007754444,0.000030899355,0.000060127288,0.00008921213,0.000094241805,0.0140505275,0.0011846668,0.97543305,0.0011723449,0.0000231053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016837575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014334469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006827087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010171502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000979298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02283889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031320758","doi":"10.2202/1534-598x.1250","title":"Likely Events and Possible States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Recipe; Monotonic function; Preference; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03492388371377373,"score_gpt":0.3302847674715733,"score_spread":0.29536088375779956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031320758","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017491454,0.0037483266,0.88917637,0.0072986637,0.00037034386,0.0001901332,0.0007415758,0.00023566814,0.080747455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5584811,0.003964433,0.41934523,0.0011603673,0.00096418074,0.0006420235,0.0011733737,0.00012971852,0.014139653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940224,0.0027608806,0.0004917598,0.0012094395,0.0011966329,0.00031891148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914436,0.005972709,0.0006131114,0.00090409664,0.00072715455,0.00033935506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006663447,0.0009877312,0.00076616026,0.003635653,0.0022316044,0.007564798,0.0018329212,0.0026651642,0.013909917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01882064,0.0010959593,0.0017165313,0.0014977562,0.0074691717,0.01626084,0.0042689317,0.0038192263,0.0014202102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010083946,0.0000052773325,0.00012922032,0.00002803972,0.000009653345,0.000058134232,0.00019281647,0.00090475695,0.000071088645,0.9948068,0.00039991332,0.0033841266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004526371,0.0000057024426,0.00006854052,0.000025486917,0.0000062114086,0.000054253625,0.00006019601,0.0018922532,0.00009717845,0.99263215,0.0051462506,0.0000074020854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008205046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085947535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013909917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001486873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009173501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046533287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031386401","doi":"10.1093/scan/nsu097","title":"Randomness increases self-reported anxiety and neurophysiological correlates of performance monitoring","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Randomness; Psychology; Anxiety; Negativity effect; Social anxiety; Order (exchange); Event (particle physics); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Statistics","score_opus":0.0759486822671648,"score_gpt":0.35921231858403485,"score_spread":0.28326363631687007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031386401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994561,0.000035157955,0.00015157986,0.000020051704,0.0000027268195,0.000005245306,0.000014321235,0.00001097126,0.0003039763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933076,0.00004645901,0.00029621247,0.000027977794,0.000009556631,0.000008650815,0.00005384099,0.000003867139,0.00022281361],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997899,0.000072246025,0.000022263925,0.000037192756,0.00005774189,0.000020671276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975091,0.0011809695,0.00090599904,0.00017480468,0.000053083808,0.00017605071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027848143,0.00029320476,0.00017947731,0.00017636265,0.00010110997,0.00043758276,0.00008160683,0.00033475502,0.0015792105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003434673,0.0001615646,0.00013199414,0.00005575494,0.00024270122,0.00028701275,0.00024341916,0.0005011683,0.000120144505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0066931224,0.0043359855,0.3230023,0.0003857241,0.00036710614,0.0009149151,0.0038598059,0.0010982656,0.6152684,0.0004728107,0.00077675126,0.04282483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008636609,0.0053967335,0.9772815,0.00001832952,0.0000806106,0.00057353085,0.00036035705,0.0011726068,0.014081377,0.00051149406,0.00040563298,0.000031484316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001947758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036961463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0015792105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008590025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005564498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0052830577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031737940","doi":"10.1007/s11031-014-9436-z","title":"Bending perception to desire: Effects of task demands, motivation, and cognitive resources","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Motivation and Emotion","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Perception; Task (project management); Biasing; Cognitive psychology; Response bias; Cognition; Contrast (vision); Cognitive bias; Attentional bias; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06474831282725908,"score_gpt":0.33008772399618636,"score_spread":0.2653394111689273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031737940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963408,0.00015693453,0.0010621685,0.00008784142,0.00002497957,0.000025415298,0.000070364746,0.000020243702,0.0022113218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980812,0.00007915819,0.0006614804,0.00012709129,0.000020194457,0.000045300672,0.00010929707,0.0000725576,0.00080374203],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927765,0.00031688568,0.000033089345,0.00014603352,0.00013990622,0.00008651539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97953725,0.016827665,0.0014116605,0.0007977722,0.00040126007,0.0010244995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019007092,0.00043531816,0.00040532002,0.0003643375,0.00027719696,0.0024202205,0.00047659923,0.0012480422,0.007431295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024836835,0.00056635216,0.00036556806,0.0002887022,0.00086253585,0.00092069554,0.0011045402,0.0014389827,0.0005535265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.050204337,0.004633083,0.22637916,0.001104893,0.0007314583,0.0005248712,0.009450453,0.0067612194,0.63864833,0.005844979,0.0017467983,0.053970423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003028183,0.0016686821,0.9759555,0.00006723083,0.00017405504,0.0001717995,0.0010094643,0.0057940413,0.009771791,0.0043829414,0.00062627526,0.00007531104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009970698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006900961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007431295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020472503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029813946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024860144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035007309","doi":"10.1037/h0087327","title":"Strategy selection in causal reasoning: When beliefs and covariation collide.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Causality (physics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Social psychology; Causal reasoning; Attribution; Cognitive psychology; Metacognition; Causal inference; Cognition; Developmental psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10551642984328458,"score_gpt":0.3890571869603014,"score_spread":0.2835407571170168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035007309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9292115,0.001143818,0.05823876,0.0007692593,0.00003708908,0.00006740438,0.00007559046,0.00009647795,0.010360177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896292,0.0001741776,0.009733868,0.00008748317,0.000025699923,0.000038474627,0.000053748576,0.00002201911,0.00023521233],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922198,0.0040761423,0.00038701625,0.0010960129,0.0017685605,0.00045248767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91813564,0.061992828,0.011352434,0.0046405466,0.0022149868,0.0016635936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010818128,0.0005941041,0.0006911877,0.0016486965,0.00050418114,0.0039453222,0.0006613535,0.001598003,0.0022655118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11358022,0.00082316727,0.00067084807,0.0012898239,0.0017537193,0.0051177796,0.0024390463,0.0014428233,0.00024778768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00282343,0.00075802964,0.5041971,0.0008455089,0.0015318288,0.0018537249,0.021882359,0.01235791,0.057757884,0.07698134,0.0012500805,0.31776083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040548912,0.0011090828,0.5107161,0.00030985163,0.0010174847,0.00209501,0.004582742,0.098223574,0.016446775,0.36050573,0.0042332113,0.00035503632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010485981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012837083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010818128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007565568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080525834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057212412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035549323","doi":"10.3758/s13423-013-0394-3","title":"Belief bias during reasoning among religious believers and skeptics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Skepticism; Syllogism; Religiosity; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive style; Association (psychology); Style (visual arts); Logical reasoning; Social psychology; Epistemology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.06870550286111418,"score_gpt":0.34729412377814173,"score_spread":0.2785886209170275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035549323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9430149,0.046487294,0.0013418782,0.0034723415,0.00020176172,0.000026814729,0.0001211571,0.000009474972,0.005324333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98551697,0.012322833,0.00061091833,0.00069501274,0.00022898745,0.000011301198,0.00011821285,0.0000058202545,0.0004900001],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998845,0.00048226645,0.0000942909,0.00013576038,0.00036248265,0.00008021291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9562321,0.033629235,0.005259649,0.000880014,0.0034363617,0.00056256045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039679594,0.00012316465,0.00035613633,0.0005141419,0.00018354412,0.001055829,0.00033717582,0.0006622605,0.0016515952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051305495,0.00015220752,0.00029413291,0.0004800869,0.0006288772,0.0009085209,0.0002754897,0.0010773701,0.00018771739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0072924774,0.0004336181,0.42986968,0.0031542645,0.0015497156,0.00062334916,0.0041625393,0.00047277432,0.006903954,0.0051027453,0.0037456262,0.5366893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042046775,0.000587767,0.9619993,0.00094363664,0.0014420763,0.0013805289,0.0025690685,0.0014186322,0.0038018022,0.012888333,0.012485726,0.0000626594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017824423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021708752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039679594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005198744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044630177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020984828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036753089","doi":"10.3758/s13421-012-0186-4","title":"More evidence for a dual-process model of conditional reasoning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Probabilistic logic; Psychology; Deductive reasoning; Cognitive psychology; Inference; Competence (human resources); Logical reasoning; Causal reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Cognition; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.43200280190254614,"score_gpt":0.49774711247939607,"score_spread":0.06574431057684993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036753089","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34700507,0.002274122,0.51631147,0.02642785,0.0012396106,0.00021228161,0.0013965378,0.0007386673,0.104394525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9415287,0.000849673,0.04387244,0.002456535,0.00078579027,0.00011280619,0.0010107934,0.0002483104,0.009134967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966253,0.00097003096,0.00023541425,0.0010429324,0.0008006126,0.00032569683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93835235,0.040480852,0.003514776,0.012833462,0.003382552,0.0014360484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009989142,0.0010643982,0.0018259047,0.0018484805,0.00072371867,0.0062683993,0.004181537,0.004849847,0.05732072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043850515,0.0009362783,0.002579104,0.0015022927,0.0032100836,0.012411184,0.0020668888,0.0064640255,0.0040474124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089665124,0.0007395564,0.0069111013,0.00041778522,0.00030961502,0.00019044,0.0005852633,0.0073142005,0.0030043079,0.94796664,0.0034003959,0.028264018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026275776,0.0000894169,0.0049679726,0.000043048276,0.000095734926,0.00033345266,0.00008392166,0.051420618,0.0007502252,0.9389921,0.002901476,0.00005930518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00275781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014916258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05732072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014692247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012301502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1917569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037625086","doi":"10.1257/aer.98.3.1145","title":"Strotz Meets Allais: Diminishing Impatience and the Certainty Effect","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":243,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Certainty; Representation (politics); Simple (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07887972630349924,"score_gpt":0.3963949627792216,"score_spread":0.31751523647572233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037625086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56573725,0.009194466,0.22429785,0.02906463,0.0004277596,0.00015499712,0.0004540072,0.00019009261,0.17047891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916574,0.0012492918,0.003793548,0.00031297057,0.0001097001,0.00003854517,0.0000376485,0.000014779756,0.0027860864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743026,0.0012190441,0.00017020856,0.00039366874,0.0005912622,0.0001956109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97458786,0.018294945,0.0030367293,0.0021231147,0.0014179038,0.0005394785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038884585,0.00039700506,0.00082394964,0.0010218342,0.0007652427,0.002958343,0.00061030115,0.0012963976,0.007702419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043194752,0.0002801693,0.0007810951,0.001330104,0.004683916,0.0035214485,0.0014949178,0.0019177601,0.0005265318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001901814,0.000035788933,0.0057219965,0.00024103693,0.000087892244,0.00036934085,0.00080899044,0.012313945,0.0006662108,0.9230631,0.0022978564,0.05420374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022624112,0.000051572613,0.00409905,0.000044130236,0.000025953865,0.0002160407,0.00020099488,0.013348266,0.00016949775,0.97691774,0.0048816823,0.000022471224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019085748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000972782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007702419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019515342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067681517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025767148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037983318","doi":"10.1509/jppm.08.155","title":"Policy and Research Related to Consumer Rebates: A Comprehensive Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Multidisciplinary approach; Consumer research; Consumer protection; State (computer science); Marketing; Public economics; Consumer behaviour; Public relations; Economics; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.5204980449335583,"score_gpt":0.5773516793151534,"score_spread":0.056853634381595075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037983318","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000051901447,0.9990252,0.00005015017,0.00036894938,0.00010887214,0.000006438694,0.0000151670865,0.0000024397425,0.00037091228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00051688985,0.9989612,0.00010180994,0.00022914952,0.00008200241,0.0000095982095,0.000017671731,0.0000011123806,0.00008040591],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699557,0.00086008647,0.00056237995,0.00033876172,0.001131878,0.00011134067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98405427,0.011221196,0.0019900566,0.00021604898,0.0022784017,0.00024004835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004832594,0.0010336436,0.0030506123,0.005639892,0.0005421777,0.0018598594,0.0017558527,0.0027468004,0.0043380465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017852793,0.00067473075,0.001444535,0.0095442785,0.0009602847,0.002564757,0.0007656472,0.0019854938,0.001348359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008843682,0.00007901854,0.00036514076,0.12516117,0.00048284384,0.00013659899,0.00011745981,0.00042310724,0.00035895495,0.0036859682,0.051931083,0.8171703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006032784,0.0001415873,0.0027233295,0.11576069,0.0012640941,0.000619025,0.00021060884,0.00014748957,0.0004313902,0.0026930063,0.87589616,0.000052316205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004672264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008602431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005639892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022586703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00851606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025557518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038387744","doi":"10.1080/02724990244000278","title":"The Relative Effect of Cue Interaction","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Asymptote; Contingency; Cognitive psychology; Judgement; Econometrics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.08141772623723703,"score_gpt":0.4693003845810417,"score_spread":0.38788265834380464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038387744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90074515,0.00481413,0.025984922,0.00083666324,0.00063651014,0.00035983286,0.0016530913,0.0011454168,0.06382422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837261,0.0007238724,0.007692127,0.0006991402,0.00019018934,0.00027355156,0.0010703105,0.00079216395,0.0048325513],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507797,0.001652158,0.0003618525,0.0011333284,0.0011668968,0.00060785055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9050327,0.08311676,0.0027724926,0.004867909,0.001976199,0.0022339248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004065484,0.0017413724,0.0020599263,0.0010372847,0.0007186103,0.002596848,0.0013679607,0.0021431453,0.023905896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059248485,0.0010000952,0.0011313764,0.00063668494,0.00086461194,0.003972434,0.0036746524,0.004654235,0.0019628438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05737797,0.003291579,0.05447499,0.003883432,0.001517033,0.0015367542,0.0013092716,0.016830077,0.5892319,0.030664314,0.0050863307,0.23479645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029592365,0.023195311,0.5902874,0.00071667397,0.005520136,0.00659241,0.0012086794,0.062718935,0.17000394,0.10730058,0.028487109,0.0010095875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016378881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013374782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023905896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001023313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092907593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07997322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038878409","doi":"10.1037/h0087366","title":"Testing architectures of the decision–confidence relation.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Low Confidence; Confidence interval; Perception; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.16137066060177452,"score_gpt":0.40004944956288097,"score_spread":0.23867878896110645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038878409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9429211,0.00020670767,0.044644963,0.0007858173,0.000036279762,0.00010843715,0.00020796822,0.00018341916,0.01090526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99062234,0.0000400451,0.008571154,0.000082103616,0.000014367691,0.000052195548,0.000188184,0.000024589213,0.00040494004],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962914,0.0014092732,0.00018164839,0.0010056285,0.0008537344,0.0002584503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8714375,0.09924994,0.011928359,0.0111656105,0.0036526073,0.002565971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008859712,0.000512412,0.0005457542,0.00058181345,0.00040399554,0.0023584475,0.0011173354,0.0014014569,0.009165728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12114198,0.00065502897,0.00078172656,0.0004625498,0.0018606713,0.0041305185,0.0022181831,0.0017650385,0.00055228017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013114721,0.0029524066,0.3642122,0.00082314096,0.0012043935,0.00082837476,0.0043443423,0.06916432,0.08229632,0.2845664,0.0030393156,0.17345409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090406067,0.0023590524,0.21674494,0.00006057135,0.00031366473,0.0007616709,0.00046696965,0.33074823,0.016462933,0.42829472,0.002720151,0.00016293193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017478258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010857991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009165728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000956359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006912256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04685515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039335428","doi":"10.1348/014466607x258696","title":"Illusion of control by proxy: Placing one's fate in the hands of another","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Carleton University","funders":"Research Centre for the Humanities; Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre","keywords":"Illusion of control; Lottery; Luck; Psychology; Ticket; Social psychology; Illusion; Perception; Advertising; Roulette; Control (management); Cognitive psychology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.10838281614715406,"score_gpt":0.4001128352617986,"score_spread":0.2917300191146445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039335428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97213554,0.0006262733,0.009451923,0.0005859814,0.000051025192,0.00002179256,0.000012133008,0.000011842253,0.017103506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99901044,0.000088302615,0.0004003023,0.00012648127,0.000009833564,0.0000060957277,0.0000054578477,0.0000020053096,0.000351019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782974,0.0012447732,0.000088173445,0.00024895748,0.00044012157,0.00014828052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904614,0.004352321,0.0023637943,0.0016980966,0.00035484988,0.0007695721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029307366,0.00034836424,0.00026244493,0.000569784,0.00072145724,0.0022660787,0.000469998,0.00075990264,0.002350208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013293788,0.00016657158,0.00029670948,0.00024825873,0.005246655,0.0027241288,0.0018186131,0.0017177778,0.00015384261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005135698,0.001887092,0.27535173,0.00089333433,0.0003502477,0.0035935687,0.13236935,0.0025107975,0.114415154,0.28033572,0.001969576,0.18118775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059571187,0.007546244,0.44688305,0.0014761639,0.0006099455,0.018873151,0.115248874,0.01910944,0.05444779,0.28213513,0.052343305,0.00073118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006763067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053399586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029307366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046943224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003827576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015499353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039855396","doi":"10.1037/a0013403","title":"Just tell me what to do: Bringing back experimenter control in active contingency tasks with the command-performance procedure and finding cue density effects along the way.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Contingency; Task (project management); Outcome (game theory); Control (management); Psychology; Contingency theory; Contingency management; Social psychology; Contingency table; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering; Machine learning","score_opus":0.05915164180727435,"score_gpt":0.3560247499129494,"score_spread":0.2968731081056751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039855396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6597526,0.0006143933,0.31353799,0.004335633,0.00056572177,0.0007759796,0.00023295544,0.0011737936,0.019010931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8691948,0.00016576606,0.12674944,0.0009968493,0.00015299379,0.0006162464,0.000070882896,0.00015571731,0.0018972576],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99394953,0.0036889534,0.00031206806,0.0007035155,0.0011803964,0.00016556795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93738335,0.044989225,0.0060488833,0.008840383,0.0016686328,0.0010694455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007876993,0.0005631791,0.00043622666,0.00037391484,0.00057245215,0.0012639903,0.0007486505,0.0010193125,0.002465146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054122545,0.0004261656,0.00025561376,0.00037622612,0.0027855902,0.0020868517,0.0013792561,0.002084583,0.00043975047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0124131935,0.0061402665,0.021458905,0.001262329,0.0003831658,0.0005676633,0.013944562,0.0028796666,0.37146145,0.103687234,0.0061140363,0.45968747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053398423,0.015343732,0.15664569,0.0004757888,0.0008483968,0.002271244,0.0041799773,0.066999204,0.39646238,0.29211208,0.05815319,0.0011683737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055875094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069677597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007876993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035738366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007019135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041658044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041362059","doi":"10.1080/02724980443000160","title":"The Attraction Effect in Decision Making: Superior Performance by Older Adults","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Attraction; Psychology; Young adult; Domain (mathematical analysis); Developmental psychology; Heuristic; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03219983119930698,"score_gpt":0.41138005434671165,"score_spread":0.3791802231474047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041362059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985929,0.00012222196,0.00011102974,0.000028992192,0.00000477668,0.0000038986796,0.000039156876,0.000002753721,0.0010942401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900997,0.000077672405,0.00019853437,0.000034592056,0.000009418842,0.0000036007539,0.000050650917,0.0000016425442,0.00061394024],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999833,0.00002813104,0.000020079344,0.000047789075,0.00004799213,0.000023056211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805874,0.00063412875,0.0006196315,0.00014981847,0.00015820801,0.0003794174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011092684,0.00022370474,0.00023416754,0.0004615929,0.00017977583,0.0005244191,0.00012042838,0.00040945993,0.0033576041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004210611,0.00013111554,0.0001373443,0.00018672024,0.00034919582,0.0007454214,0.0005186714,0.0003533434,0.00043561854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021215407,0.0005755319,0.8879745,0.000120727076,0.0000653116,0.0006602821,0.0056333407,0.00025552194,0.038883373,0.0008569919,0.0007569035,0.06209607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019565603,0.00055594527,0.9952833,0.000009107551,0.000015538571,0.0004191837,0.0003728891,0.00033438698,0.001974084,0.00047466363,0.00052967353,0.000011692809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010396132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001052891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033576041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090241825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010298942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011232376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041413148","doi":"10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01037.x","title":"Implied Preference for Seismic Design Level and Earthquake Insurance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Analysis","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Actuarial science; Preference; Seismic risk; Risk management; Insurance policy; Seismic analysis; Happiness; Business; Economics; Engineering; Finance; Microeconomics; Psychology","score_opus":0.4257793941713929,"score_gpt":0.38949549103244174,"score_spread":0.036283903138951135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041413148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660511,0.00006567821,0.025152067,0.00026941652,0.000010554583,0.000031288004,0.000043465738,0.000008980747,0.008367473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962063,0.000023653778,0.003339491,0.000020218087,0.000003862544,0.000009497704,0.000022825174,0.0000011859598,0.00037286206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757916,0.0013799879,0.00013499997,0.00017298966,0.0005770431,0.0001559431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882604,0.008028784,0.0018034081,0.000963292,0.00059918803,0.00034489293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034943393,0.00035602937,0.000267029,0.0003825974,0.0002877791,0.0013249606,0.00031672936,0.0008987076,0.0051495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020646056,0.00015067095,0.00044199344,0.0002714694,0.0010282579,0.0010187896,0.0006238894,0.0009068672,0.00022752011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032715767,0.0015207472,0.262621,0.000636656,0.00060095603,0.0015792741,0.004781961,0.15420726,0.039345384,0.37196097,0.0016044792,0.15786989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002687227,0.0023472747,0.24207932,0.00017197333,0.0002520807,0.0015811176,0.0066496283,0.3034733,0.008593998,0.42726716,0.007056358,0.00025912846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037014426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090442516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060862245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036285096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018480062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041686768","doi":"10.1016/j.beproc.2014.07.021","title":"Discounting of delayed rewards: (A)theoretical interpretation of the Kirby questionnaire","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioural Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Psychology; Interpretation (philosophy); Delay discounting; Social psychology; Discounting; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Impulsivity; Economics","score_opus":0.048147320755506824,"score_gpt":0.3573796646016789,"score_spread":0.3092323438461721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041686768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9234552,0.0003110158,0.05294154,0.0011244199,0.000046734553,0.00015029691,0.000492865,0.00004154692,0.02143626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952526,0.00008691249,0.0037095007,0.000064957894,0.000009113525,0.00002864578,0.00007118475,0.0000074416625,0.0007695946],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835074,0.0010155487,0.000114328795,0.00012316396,0.00028978018,0.00010638439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789397,0.016051888,0.002223766,0.0012566843,0.0009891649,0.0005387619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038331135,0.000189954,0.000313722,0.0006826131,0.0001686423,0.0010034699,0.00064733624,0.0005562482,0.004158708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033395674,0.00018313751,0.0002776818,0.0005916091,0.0009099203,0.001656328,0.0006652618,0.0010324317,0.00027217847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022269038,0.0006336448,0.4734496,0.00038856876,0.00024434127,0.0004709037,0.008861256,0.006971194,0.007971694,0.335212,0.0031328665,0.16043703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013181892,0.0009513146,0.70457745,0.00015142054,0.00017621633,0.0014359956,0.004440812,0.045112975,0.004557874,0.2283688,0.009849534,0.0002458147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038846165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002174898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004158708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007515427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007051969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020271719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041745738","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.012","title":"The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":213,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fluency; Psychology; Metacognition; Cognitive psychology; Perception; Processing fluency; Verbal fluency test; Feeling; Cognition; Metamemory; Social psychology; Neuropsychology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.09725029981884653,"score_gpt":0.403945180666073,"score_spread":0.30669488084722646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041745738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95968145,0.0003794462,0.025544057,0.00044687395,0.000062987514,0.000043801734,0.00018203563,0.00012952257,0.013529759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930421,0.00008984871,0.0062894393,0.00005694441,0.000037605234,0.000026277632,0.00008053695,0.000043458567,0.0003337072],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811673,0.00075053604,0.00013971476,0.00028441503,0.0005302893,0.00017837848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9380209,0.046402823,0.008714985,0.0025630782,0.0025241815,0.001774179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003207163,0.00046998746,0.00034829948,0.0014803946,0.000393779,0.0044848127,0.00052336697,0.0011997353,0.0033499107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057500828,0.00045632615,0.00031178957,0.0006292525,0.00097095146,0.0049831206,0.0012371995,0.0013296606,0.00030754186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013381213,0.0026182043,0.2895085,0.0011048131,0.00065982575,0.0011475465,0.011155398,0.009452767,0.15603445,0.07815212,0.002888651,0.4338965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062104734,0.002329343,0.6765488,0.00032145498,0.000510573,0.0012457402,0.0032881256,0.059046187,0.051576845,0.20059474,0.0035628565,0.00035439758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007372146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059375085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044848127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003512929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006495242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016961277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042218778","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0020262","title":"Of Black Swans and Tossed Coins: Is the Description-Experience Gap in Risky Choice Limited to Rare Events?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Rare events; Black swan theory; Probabilistic logic; Psychology; Weighting; Preference; Reflection (computer programming); Actuarial science; Ask price; Social psychology; Risk-seeking; Economics; Computer science; Medicine; Microeconomics; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.3907233306597909,"score_gpt":0.3642609721010951,"score_spread":0.02646235855869583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042218778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87071836,0.0027117154,0.03193996,0.014298111,0.00021073,0.00008572328,0.00013700723,0.000052854655,0.07984557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99373996,0.000446168,0.002902659,0.000955893,0.000057098554,0.000034307046,0.000041890926,0.000018988803,0.0018030824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99645007,0.002177338,0.00014837377,0.0005036719,0.00050011766,0.0002204598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9589693,0.029087426,0.0044284575,0.0039021228,0.0016398221,0.001972892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010055601,0.0002797033,0.0007248005,0.0008616844,0.0010594169,0.0024909049,0.0007412424,0.0020096763,0.011857584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10446836,0.00043995844,0.000632462,0.0005269505,0.006808753,0.009892719,0.0023554917,0.0021284078,0.0009004557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046415925,0.00078536686,0.123786055,0.0005516253,0.00028953917,0.0011146357,0.019319067,0.0057673794,0.0027452363,0.5641607,0.007281964,0.2695568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018350493,0.00047472937,0.06627251,0.00042886016,0.00012599547,0.0011428716,0.0060545634,0.012120889,0.0010101487,0.90041226,0.011673369,0.00010027001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014643325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013335369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011857584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005467432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006172615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05317974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042331900","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01258.x","title":"What If Industrial–Organizational Psychology Decided to Take Workplace Decisions Seriously?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Conversation; Psychology; Public relations; Field (mathematics); Applied psychology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.18721704547401288,"score_gpt":0.4220267278344396,"score_spread":0.23480968236042674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042331900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038526017,0.009571579,0.008185404,0.91340584,0.003165578,0.00004027397,0.000036008998,0.000030032346,0.027039254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7708899,0.0076998346,0.01022371,0.20420031,0.0022633728,0.000090928166,0.000030906318,0.000037235015,0.004563794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98351085,0.0089678075,0.00056395703,0.0017164996,0.0032038733,0.0020369699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9653627,0.020261845,0.002474415,0.0012358007,0.0059685917,0.004696611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033801496,0.0003423512,0.0008371526,0.0015677395,0.0047638305,0.0098512005,0.0014599047,0.0078260675,0.0026674771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052729905,0.00036968052,0.0006210184,0.0017195253,0.021176111,0.0111893425,0.0031035156,0.011959684,0.00068519684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012785713,0.0003920886,0.020944739,0.0005890353,0.000105719046,0.00028698376,0.014653959,0.00087852334,0.0005777095,0.74271935,0.052042052,0.1666821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008539514,0.00013803168,0.010994865,0.0010961796,0.000027162327,0.00016306725,0.025923828,0.0013921071,0.0005897026,0.8146412,0.14484234,0.00010622347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071306797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007520124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033801496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007341756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008386372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17876154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042676943","doi":"10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.757","title":"Biases and fallacies, memories and predictions: Comment on Roy, Christenfeld, and McKenzie (2005).","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Psychological Bulletin","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Psychology; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Cognitive psychology; Scope (computer science); Positive economics; Social psychology; Econometrics; Philosophy; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.19113782122074144,"score_gpt":0.4033344578184449,"score_spread":0.21219663659770346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042676943","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024604204,0.0020908578,0.00011365249,0.98987585,0.0067517306,0.00000717201,0.000061219944,0.000026428484,0.00082703267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033915436,0.0012143459,0.00024123024,0.98008233,0.012861951,0.000037752034,0.000023980112,0.000022822553,0.0021240928],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957533,0.0009676648,0.00043644366,0.00078425265,0.0016416386,0.0004166934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838982,0.010356526,0.0009126237,0.00056630763,0.0031539567,0.0011124295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071924706,0.0013307877,0.0019302829,0.0012100564,0.003939175,0.004991201,0.008525846,0.04680822,0.008255713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030307382,0.0009868301,0.0013744923,0.0018151022,0.006263583,0.0075796084,0.003094263,0.046900023,0.009305863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050015187,0.000019671608,0.0002354023,0.000054646534,0.000008906028,0.00031397436,0.00023096018,0.000036545574,0.00007104016,0.005102043,0.99015737,0.0037194921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019759354,0.00010693185,0.0044551203,0.00067655626,0.00006174604,0.001984737,0.0020877123,0.0009832454,0.00072779914,0.04716927,0.94135326,0.00019589382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017750852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026378913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04680822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059801885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042334986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04338956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043155959","doi":"10.1037/h0087354","title":"Belief-Based and covariation-based cues affect causal discounting.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Causality (physics); Attribution; Discounting; Causal inference; Causal model; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Cognitive psychology; Temporal discounting; Delay discounting; Counterfactual conditional; Counterfactual thinking; Developmental psychology; Econometrics; Statistics; Impulsivity; Communication","score_opus":0.12376577122614013,"score_gpt":0.40684286137227116,"score_spread":0.283077090146131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043155959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99082255,0.0004981346,0.003968303,0.00023680444,0.000027073062,0.000028764865,0.00008738358,0.000016362117,0.0043146727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969158,0.0002088062,0.0024289233,0.00004739896,0.000011891038,0.000010949847,0.0000690014,0.000008369032,0.00029894337],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988701,0.00040394207,0.00007697644,0.00020446359,0.00034922748,0.0000952723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717809,0.019894708,0.0051495084,0.0012582729,0.0007616084,0.0011549668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003092778,0.00040802913,0.00042382473,0.000737837,0.0003486478,0.0019179893,0.00034086354,0.0010067842,0.0044959313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037408844,0.0005349488,0.00037830704,0.00048605385,0.00067438075,0.0013892892,0.0011643105,0.001318386,0.00016573873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011085237,0.003193792,0.67566276,0.0010086121,0.0009701556,0.0010822702,0.0061705844,0.009987847,0.09714912,0.03533945,0.0012566102,0.15709357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003672497,0.0014392572,0.9163142,0.00009545156,0.0005727449,0.0006660858,0.0010343245,0.021018052,0.008500794,0.047708463,0.0020895612,0.00019382205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001882194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025509088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044959313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007065493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041146547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016356409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043253163","doi":"10.3758/bf03211578","title":"Not only base rates are neglected in the Engineer-Lawyer problem: An investigation of reasoners’ underutilization of complementarity","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Normative; Probabilistic logic; Psychology; Base (topology); Task (project management); Constraint (computer-aided design); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.17929786430127426,"score_gpt":0.37477334283953,"score_spread":0.19547547853825575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043253163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8813512,0.0006454626,0.077153735,0.012271096,0.000070708404,0.000059718222,0.00008381726,0.00008509165,0.028279204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937641,0.00013629896,0.004852993,0.00032337257,0.00004384167,0.00001936601,0.000017235365,0.000019006984,0.00082376844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477166,0.0023035144,0.00029159433,0.0010412292,0.001013691,0.00057835784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74590755,0.22363251,0.013053782,0.011930655,0.0036675392,0.0018079851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021563813,0.00037952382,0.0013561299,0.001605015,0.001695148,0.0049150256,0.0018560331,0.0043623657,0.005976153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13280483,0.0005752375,0.0011983025,0.0013953401,0.0052395896,0.012854571,0.002726459,0.0037571804,0.00028092734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013717567,0.00060861994,0.063748255,0.00031833144,0.00036939632,0.00081328483,0.006011419,0.026166055,0.002177061,0.79137933,0.0028129688,0.104223594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018184452,0.00019612827,0.02012706,0.000065085726,0.00017760466,0.00042850611,0.00294061,0.058367323,0.0020248948,0.9128506,0.0025735903,0.000066728644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034481485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027513602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021563813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018646314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002262313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114041686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044003764","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2013.791642","title":"When emotions improve reasoning: The possible roles of relevance and utility","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.050805653278423506,"score_gpt":0.3322174880239647,"score_spread":0.2814118347455412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044003764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9021257,0.004746561,0.033533666,0.006182932,0.0002815898,0.00014532814,0.00011151254,0.00015379091,0.052718896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884614,0.0008543571,0.009401968,0.00038347568,0.000059567534,0.00003615908,0.00004380484,0.000040747902,0.0007184854],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99344194,0.003418803,0.0004413459,0.0007166354,0.0014022894,0.0005789809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9694456,0.022993404,0.003275681,0.0021185887,0.001377214,0.0007895803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006696475,0.00042512646,0.0004798769,0.0007459188,0.00046052822,0.004376145,0.00055599294,0.0011958339,0.00358124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055253845,0.00040262932,0.00097234943,0.00055203383,0.0028564348,0.0053123916,0.0018739098,0.0016881042,0.00033487412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052983784,0.002256661,0.1093088,0.004808478,0.0012970497,0.0022665672,0.02146705,0.014420288,0.07143276,0.17587854,0.0033433572,0.58822197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005573875,0.0014905198,0.24930525,0.0010682858,0.0012152039,0.0012163025,0.008011647,0.016748827,0.02722815,0.67814785,0.014806276,0.00020427554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041038074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059554185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006696475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011198854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067499996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035414755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044641675","doi":"10.1080/13546780500172490","title":"Conditional probability and pragmatic conditionals: Dissociating truth and effectiveness","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Conditional probability; Inference; Regular conditional probability; Statement (logic); Conditional expectation; Conditional independence; Law of total probability; Mathematics; Conditional probability distribution; Psychology; Econometrics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Random variable; Epistemology; Posterior probability; Philosophy; Probability mass function","score_opus":0.04135405219078417,"score_gpt":0.35201243388704573,"score_spread":0.3106583816962616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044641675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9195207,0.0008136325,0.05405298,0.000932314,0.00006304392,0.00012724623,0.0005981109,0.00024252028,0.023649508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99582654,0.00008785254,0.0035945212,0.000052398747,0.00003095143,0.0000311643,0.00016095435,0.000035734203,0.00017984564],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98962855,0.00537243,0.00066796155,0.0013935915,0.0024961259,0.00044144556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.725879,0.23780671,0.018368594,0.00851994,0.0073156366,0.0021100945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0145115685,0.00059574284,0.00075122836,0.003086106,0.00056621985,0.0041163634,0.00089111016,0.0016050303,0.008648989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23234119,0.00057664304,0.00069042965,0.0022379041,0.0035332162,0.0065056747,0.0034845022,0.0017774657,0.0005708399],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007449925,0.00079191156,0.45291525,0.0021845768,0.0012989547,0.00095892156,0.023451267,0.030309469,0.023302339,0.16078782,0.004294249,0.29225537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016166289,0.00052965584,0.685732,0.00029903758,0.00044776953,0.00054761244,0.0021756082,0.0908484,0.0053959116,0.2111105,0.0023553802,0.00039647074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025481174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013651671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0145115685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010911926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054147537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07674545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045154181","doi":"10.2308/bria.2001.13.1.111","title":"A Research Note on the Effects of Gender and Task Complexity on an Audit Judgment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral Research in Accounting","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Audit; Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Social psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Balance (ability); Applied psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Accounting; Economics","score_opus":0.6534902337883695,"score_gpt":0.5838730889860605,"score_spread":0.06961714480230896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045154181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815781,0.00088019925,0.0069505335,0.0005948954,0.00010126168,0.00005786722,0.00016605576,0.000038742986,0.0096322475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937733,0.00018582742,0.0040921234,0.00016391503,0.000096635755,0.000020015974,0.00008878897,0.000059389477,0.0015199654],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923872,0.003665912,0.0005908509,0.00082841277,0.0022688492,0.0002589578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66111654,0.2995195,0.017623179,0.0115652615,0.00769942,0.0024760854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008676686,0.00048130073,0.00044008935,0.0006417102,0.0005310848,0.0013940107,0.00044075793,0.00043674384,0.0069319685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08451655,0.00032933004,0.00047065452,0.00045631872,0.0008829218,0.0014496704,0.000916711,0.0008427021,0.0006633669],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016655175,0.0009704789,0.63805556,0.0005461407,0.00043209837,0.00086241507,0.0054614954,0.0015333307,0.16062276,0.0025468497,0.0012637919,0.17104982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006776735,0.0025528953,0.96640354,0.000090030175,0.00013207983,0.0011542527,0.0009823464,0.0019059333,0.021757094,0.002242034,0.0026128115,0.000099187535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011625433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025522825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008676686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043537276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005325868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04588729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045364899","doi":"10.1007/s11299-012-0100-6","title":"Analytic thinking: do you feel like it?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind & Society","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Fluency; Processing fluency; Type (biology); Quality (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Philosophy of science; Psychology; Process (computing); Epistemology; Computer science; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1506949779290272,"score_gpt":0.4053496154379318,"score_spread":0.2546546375089046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045364899","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027122982,0.03731671,0.013857849,0.85469925,0.018810123,0.000053070537,0.000080719656,0.00026188107,0.047797445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55255556,0.02450993,0.017508555,0.37732628,0.0115489485,0.00025929,0.00012325,0.0004045274,0.01576368],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832202,0.010678968,0.0005915624,0.0005984377,0.004175518,0.0007352515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9455379,0.023845825,0.0057402076,0.0022309553,0.015213235,0.0074318163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015381386,0.00053345866,0.0007570122,0.0013802758,0.0022052682,0.008630667,0.0010030947,0.0037709593,0.0062342477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10577416,0.0003118752,0.0007769713,0.001027612,0.013207911,0.0067043873,0.0028965673,0.008743925,0.002920424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031426467,0.0002835697,0.016218113,0.0012186421,0.00044437978,0.00033736258,0.033299726,0.0001638842,0.0012422316,0.091224246,0.55653083,0.29872274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037420593,0.00040315636,0.014627981,0.0060622464,0.0004114413,0.003196042,0.08163124,0.0008454683,0.00096438953,0.4527092,0.43843243,0.00034219155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009796661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011954962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015381386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016176854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003564663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0813455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045702439","doi":"10.1007/s10899-013-9411-8","title":"Using Sound to Unmask Losses Disguised as Wins in Multiline Slot Machines","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Gambling Studies","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Sight; Psychology; Sound (geography); Audiology; Social psychology; Acoustics; Physics; Medicine; Optics","score_opus":0.41006021259346714,"score_gpt":0.5406725113553841,"score_spread":0.13061229876191693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045702439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8956419,0.00009760662,0.088675834,0.00054878683,0.00032924788,0.00008290982,0.00008020553,0.001069765,0.013473716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802361,0.00001712134,0.01726514,0.000093306866,0.000022672875,0.000025100942,0.00003248756,0.000072974835,0.0022351062],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906904,0.00039071878,0.00004261519,0.00016495911,0.00021379975,0.0001188827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98986816,0.008147823,0.00055232516,0.0007331128,0.00037756312,0.0003209654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021261384,0.00034272007,0.00037903534,0.00028875095,0.00039842818,0.0013384675,0.00074810785,0.00088986586,0.008826222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018623104,0.00025456602,0.00018606301,0.00017630818,0.0010247466,0.0021699478,0.0011440782,0.001329491,0.000794529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019068435,0.0031622741,0.037382763,0.00056685857,0.00024707674,0.0009071238,0.0041306377,0.049978312,0.060370103,0.08055999,0.010000483,0.73362595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056457665,0.0053861137,0.03225604,0.0001929904,0.00033585014,0.0006642497,0.0031821514,0.70494103,0.04292983,0.1955247,0.013852807,0.00016961352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047727913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010559614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008826222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022592326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033741893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02952665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046545429","doi":"10.2307/3505086","title":"10.2307/3505086","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Comparative law","score_opus":0.06514964823937326,"score_gpt":0.32069619570708313,"score_spread":0.2555465474677099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046545429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039844416,0.00036959464,0.00056738046,0.00035913603,0.00039768033,0.000050769926,0.0011492934,0.0006906679,0.99601704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00132191,0.00033320894,0.0005713301,0.0003637243,0.00008902098,0.00003050306,0.0015332464,0.00032451135,0.9954326],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999481,0.0000415527,0.000038640945,0.00014403494,0.00020886389,0.00008600629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981585,0.00041784218,0.00007707508,0.00034801755,0.00045404246,0.00054440665],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008188683,0.0016600033,0.0011251074,0.002330498,0.0015248597,0.0044983565,0.0019022053,0.0027177741,0.98452514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019419241,0.0007286758,0.00077419635,0.002601522,0.0017410507,0.004942298,0.0036281971,0.0015271483,0.9850857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020613291,0.0001837098,0.0005122622,0.0003864001,0.000016764265,0.00019134914,0.00008132381,0.00021963366,0.002052221,0.0071858205,0.55513275,0.43383166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028169774,0.00003813668,0.00074549526,0.00015136001,0.0000069127736,0.00019515489,0.00011145198,0.00016795333,0.0002975893,0.0014637985,0.9967795,0.0000144235555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039798175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039474554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015474856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010318953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012192403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02207303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047410999","doi":"10.1177/1745691613483774","title":"Theory and Metatheory in the Study of Dual Processing","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metatheory; Falsifiability; Dual (grammatical number); Constructive; Epistemology; Task (project management); Testability; Process (computing); Categorization; Confusion; Duality (order theory); Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1527094310187146,"score_gpt":0.48689829322513534,"score_spread":0.33418886220642074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047410999","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010503069,0.019166572,0.26149923,0.616808,0.006375733,0.000093054856,0.00016991724,0.00025770423,0.08512665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73386925,0.012351459,0.14036818,0.07841525,0.018829802,0.0011750145,0.00020679967,0.00048753343,0.014296687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9759561,0.016591288,0.0008884303,0.0026294678,0.00312291,0.00081183476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9292161,0.06024773,0.0022592333,0.004327685,0.002945972,0.00100339],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03680816,0.0010183927,0.001583079,0.004877699,0.0036014204,0.00979054,0.0057777837,0.009684067,0.0082842065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03390718,0.00075362995,0.002309539,0.0039699497,0.044949695,0.025133276,0.0064834827,0.01607828,0.0012450935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005310452,0.000004817133,0.00004398673,0.00003873558,0.000008404556,0.00002655231,0.0005537852,0.00013597964,0.000017730872,0.99587953,0.002261114,0.0010239817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005868539,0.0000042797997,0.00003780187,0.000045257155,0.0000028854918,0.000034312026,0.00017596237,0.00066291896,0.00003273627,0.9919676,0.0070240474,0.0000062618437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008198129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005652568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96319187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006460615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026149845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19466251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049536075","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2008.11.004","title":"Stereotypes in intertemporal choice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Intertemporal choice; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.14509064838325295,"score_gpt":0.3881977480230911,"score_spread":0.24310709963983815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049536075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91470563,0.00036759282,0.004306157,0.0028416882,0.00007048586,0.00002030405,0.0001424553,0.000010453932,0.0775353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832994,0.000085090964,0.00042103545,0.00016334528,0.000028505547,0.000007071508,0.000031184565,0.0000053233,0.00092843233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998741,0.00065621344,0.00006346384,0.00010423382,0.00028105904,0.00015407712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761703,0.016602902,0.0033658314,0.0015427023,0.0013738932,0.00094441336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004102329,0.00015325345,0.0002346664,0.001004939,0.0009170679,0.0022001173,0.00037192967,0.0012836949,0.009194927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017111965,0.00029631992,0.0002213592,0.0008479378,0.001813773,0.002065145,0.00090457854,0.0012024478,0.0004546766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015171014,0.0010264757,0.2322331,0.00017952523,0.00012151978,0.0007180811,0.016893009,0.0034245744,0.0032917385,0.6621867,0.0057040215,0.07270415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023744476,0.00020522457,0.18354796,0.00010932791,0.0001045888,0.00053317985,0.011285953,0.009149677,0.0011234054,0.78487897,0.008749475,0.00007483369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003081658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036676112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009194927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077055785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005415796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030760169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049641104","doi":"10.1037/0033-295x.109.2.358","title":"False memories of the future: A critique of the applications of probabilistic reasoning to the study of cognitive processes.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Psychological Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; A priori and a posteriori; Set (abstract data type); Cognition; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology; Space (punctuation); Outcome (game theory); Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.25478039883417036,"score_gpt":0.5171935579952102,"score_spread":0.2624131591610398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049641104","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000757104,0.77475166,0.01956039,0.18509088,0.004045576,0.000026040569,0.00005663135,0.000048844377,0.015662827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06380977,0.79881316,0.014793864,0.09584596,0.019215511,0.00028208946,0.000076719254,0.00007065498,0.00709226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923173,0.0041298587,0.00037047328,0.0005312593,0.0025069593,0.00014411469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96359795,0.030833894,0.0014225326,0.0009979764,0.0028163758,0.0003311742],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01602656,0.0010530475,0.0022645688,0.005468766,0.0012292642,0.005830387,0.0043803775,0.009769801,0.0021082007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03512103,0.00065604015,0.0011849147,0.0057692463,0.019977411,0.012631453,0.002519819,0.009882468,0.0018871382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005248133,0.00003535416,0.00034593904,0.0018907222,0.00013441115,0.0002522717,0.001324554,0.0008446153,0.0001235424,0.7386361,0.086427696,0.16993225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003656427,0.00004577775,0.00056369975,0.0020249598,0.000051468425,0.000855349,0.0006344844,0.0007684876,0.0001845966,0.71136326,0.2834281,0.0000432446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030167487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034065084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98397344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039316835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042406083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08475757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050105116","doi":"10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.994","title":"Sophisticated approval voting, ignorance priors, and plurality heuristics: A behavioral social choice analysis in a Thurstonian framework.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; National Institute of Mental Health; Institut Européen d'Administration des Affaires; University of Illinois System","keywords":"Heuristics; Voting; Condorcet method; Heuristic; Approval voting; Social choice theory; Computer science; Ignorance; Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2599384395697572,"score_gpt":0.5439416231756281,"score_spread":0.2840031836058709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050105116","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21514092,0.0029180364,0.7220144,0.0070014773,0.00019328074,0.0002513803,0.000113780254,0.000092211325,0.05227446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9065477,0.0012373388,0.08734061,0.0005637152,0.00017793471,0.00018566128,0.000054825916,0.000023329052,0.003868864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99005485,0.008411662,0.00016200723,0.0005044742,0.0005874308,0.00027958458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796913,0.017083388,0.001570726,0.000862113,0.0004552727,0.00033725993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01030922,0.00070989266,0.0010804305,0.0015798016,0.00082181883,0.0032542509,0.0013132397,0.0018743664,0.0031859358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020892622,0.00048729824,0.0012987043,0.001264157,0.0043819724,0.004821272,0.0011466177,0.0025879743,0.00030125675],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077766104,0.00009725296,0.0021199866,0.000085871536,0.00015033185,0.000048906946,0.00041370624,0.022564907,0.0002371172,0.95212543,0.0008226951,0.021255976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043641132,0.00008513472,0.0021884923,0.00003038384,0.000049172068,0.000043905507,0.00017032052,0.1241708,0.0001757849,0.8701529,0.002860953,0.000028461243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027491553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030342296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01030922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028001308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011410335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054521024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050140390","doi":"10.1108/jpbm-11-2012-0211","title":"Price sequences, perceived variability, and choice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Product & Brand Management","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Predictability; Preference; Revealed preference; Economics; Value (mathematics); Variance (accounting); Originality; Econometrics; Vendor; Willingness to pay; Microeconomics; Marketing; Psychology; Social psychology; Statistics; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06607155138578254,"score_gpt":0.35446210262587446,"score_spread":0.28839055124009194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050140390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99735045,0.00009696584,0.00054582785,0.00010549721,0.000004366845,0.0000070869196,0.0000313317,0.0000026196833,0.0018558259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993755,0.000048530026,0.00035733025,0.000028148646,0.0000067581045,0.0000042418737,0.000033303062,0.0000016221044,0.00014450373],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871075,0.0007143159,0.00008439842,0.00013378404,0.00030526548,0.000051531097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97665286,0.01494399,0.005647074,0.0011203878,0.000534722,0.0011009191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023069892,0.00013344648,0.0001909779,0.00054668955,0.0002920904,0.0013144691,0.00022312875,0.00046817545,0.004366342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018578732,0.00021553371,0.00027845515,0.00039767762,0.0006098816,0.0008868619,0.00039483374,0.0007524542,0.00025382874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016931543,0.0012653561,0.9471813,0.00012849529,0.00030853238,0.00021509716,0.002195428,0.002423883,0.0030524656,0.0032195621,0.0003985487,0.037918042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059352482,0.00082266924,0.9781859,0.00004176072,0.00007673081,0.00046127258,0.0016026257,0.008367018,0.0006752083,0.008855657,0.0008065128,0.000045334207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073354173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068730465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004366342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003164849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019225536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014606833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050297329","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v2n1p1","title":"A Competitor of the Kolmogorov--Smirnov Test for the Goodness-of-fit Problem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kolmogorov–Smirnov test; Mathematics; Test statistic; Goodness of fit; Anderson–Darling test; Null distribution; One- and two-tailed tests; Empirical distribution function; Statistic; Pearson's chi-squared test; Statistics; Null hypothesis; Test (biology); Statistical hypothesis testing; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.14465956577144715,"score_gpt":0.41062203538503056,"score_spread":0.2659624696135834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050297329","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029339246,0.003238664,0.95055157,0.0024222988,0.0011252475,0.0002263545,0.00047357337,0.00048098725,0.0121421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55983746,0.0012969937,0.42912313,0.0016640534,0.001143943,0.0008410681,0.00088265486,0.000317758,0.004893041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9599268,0.022810284,0.0018973051,0.0064059743,0.008128569,0.00083113747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9018163,0.0754045,0.0042969384,0.0092271445,0.007997179,0.0012578912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029735085,0.0011971068,0.0028092354,0.004055239,0.0016859343,0.004648145,0.004056379,0.0042770994,0.008280654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14392355,0.0004117433,0.002071987,0.0047785547,0.005447564,0.0060765715,0.0039017457,0.0054816524,0.0020395683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082225667,0.0002235591,0.020884799,0.001333143,0.00070297444,0.00055411726,0.00060850853,0.020802736,0.003233912,0.6361005,0.009385555,0.30534798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019521349,0.0021424443,0.019960735,0.00052933063,0.0003279009,0.004151906,0.0007313567,0.2449973,0.007104273,0.67429644,0.04512413,0.00043895672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010446925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009450669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029735085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019183498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003739424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15725607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050439739","doi":"10.3758/mc.38.4.485","title":"Conditional reasoning, frequency of counterexamples, and the effect of response modality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical variable; Psychology; Geiger counter; Probabilistic logic; Set (abstract data type); Modality (human–computer interaction); Frequency; Response bias; Cognitive psychology; Counterexample; Mode (computer interface); Information processing; Certainty; Response time; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.042735545157592064,"score_gpt":0.3620443540357183,"score_spread":0.3193088088781262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050439739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898197,0.00041355754,0.005110993,0.00039588986,0.00004110738,0.00004165124,0.00016624453,0.00010039333,0.0039104503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99648595,0.00015797044,0.0021741705,0.00011910709,0.00008706395,0.00004208503,0.000144267,0.00008194812,0.00070734037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99037457,0.0053871763,0.00078327616,0.0016184611,0.0011986587,0.00063789194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.37965158,0.57454824,0.020370424,0.018228726,0.0025349467,0.004666017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019769702,0.0007056877,0.0014957835,0.0014510708,0.00058508164,0.0044746995,0.0018148404,0.003674118,0.012612377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29255286,0.0010202494,0.0010719477,0.00085633754,0.002564652,0.0058862898,0.0022557557,0.0044290572,0.0006328889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08273205,0.01073263,0.5815689,0.0011121718,0.0035760067,0.0022352312,0.0029749612,0.046387985,0.09421667,0.029234348,0.0027278203,0.14250128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021486601,0.0056739673,0.66744006,0.00020318093,0.0019797452,0.003000206,0.0008785,0.12334644,0.011862939,0.18136138,0.0016352903,0.00046965232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009819528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080932624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019769702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060426025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009015842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1045534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050646562","doi":"10.1509/jmkr.45.2.159","title":"Can Trade-Ins Hurt You? Exploring the Effect of a Trade-In on Consumers' Willingness to Pay for a New Product","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Willingness to pay; Value (mathematics); Database transaction; Negotiation; Business; Marketing; Economics; Microeconomics; Advertising; Computer science","score_opus":0.3619868966167896,"score_gpt":0.4739426407358499,"score_spread":0.11195574411906029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050646562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920739,0.00021414633,0.000434438,0.001450542,0.000036162775,0.00002480144,0.000034255016,0.000008063521,0.005723688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984054,0.00015409353,0.0002808178,0.00038478902,0.00002240044,0.000027326108,0.00002512427,0.0000040708114,0.0006960778],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896276,0.000615237,0.000042137286,0.00012844338,0.000100102625,0.00015119083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91757345,0.0744249,0.0051138997,0.0010974532,0.00069704076,0.0010933379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028417057,0.00048244392,0.0005189033,0.0003737288,0.0009475852,0.0022775636,0.0005870887,0.003062131,0.011700291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027196215,0.00037190982,0.0013879223,0.00038057414,0.0015334842,0.002482487,0.0008702596,0.003158166,0.00067995564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025830355,0.034174625,0.7676537,0.0011222851,0.0024674514,0.0022902924,0.008753011,0.010807655,0.013792842,0.033654742,0.0063122613,0.09314081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027869279,0.014809842,0.825679,0.00020405756,0.0038905814,0.00054754625,0.016066069,0.04505576,0.0092811445,0.07350582,0.007873268,0.00029989972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002238593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023448071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011700291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010171555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053246674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039141417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051536116","doi":"10.1007/s10111-015-0334-2","title":"The effect of time constraint on anticipation, decision making, and option generation in complex and dynamic environments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition Technology & Work","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Constraint (computer-aided design); Cognition; Heuristic; Intervention (counseling); Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Process (computing); Psychology; Task (project management); Time constraint; Action (physics); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.07022785863943765,"score_gpt":0.37403135774618934,"score_spread":0.3038034991067517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051536116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866676,0.00025944947,0.0076065236,0.00036803464,0.000017926375,0.000014162548,0.00009216945,0.00001633872,0.004957917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982358,0.00008678463,0.0012507791,0.000022461705,0.000008011565,0.000008941809,0.000040782383,0.000010657,0.00033573576],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990282,0.00045793282,0.000070201306,0.00012083952,0.00014292303,0.00018000416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9185248,0.07304731,0.0038738346,0.0016413041,0.000789571,0.0021230788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030796211,0.00031961533,0.00045941691,0.00039568078,0.0004325721,0.0023535632,0.00055494544,0.0010371795,0.0054422216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045206927,0.00038244465,0.00031882676,0.0005078885,0.0009748883,0.0028266434,0.001022789,0.0012452666,0.00016731945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016309114,0.0030184023,0.24706495,0.0007342119,0.00066808047,0.0019382585,0.002689757,0.38877705,0.035955254,0.15257324,0.0025022074,0.1477694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059208507,0.0015427239,0.30148256,0.0000918674,0.00032301588,0.00047191343,0.0016949283,0.38945845,0.0050731627,0.29734164,0.001674959,0.00025260198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039765323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003730359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054422216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065247883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001036809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01820606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052329640","doi":"10.1037/a0031451","title":"Magnitude comparison extended: How lack of knowledge informs comparative judgments under uncertainty.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Heuristics; Per capita; Context (archaeology); Magnitude (astronomy); Heuristic; Gross domestic product; Product (mathematics); Econometrics; Object (grammar); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Demography; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.37136963209648177,"score_gpt":0.5385508077202639,"score_spread":0.1671811756237821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052329640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.875359,0.00350377,0.0798107,0.0022004535,0.0001878041,0.00015255903,0.00042768987,0.00015908747,0.038199034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906447,0.00030998306,0.008232084,0.00021422954,0.00005402317,0.000047818532,0.00012744655,0.000028097504,0.0003416674],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99194455,0.0034249818,0.0004277199,0.0019823208,0.0019363367,0.00028418098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9024696,0.06992445,0.016423063,0.00625526,0.0032799218,0.0016477893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01041219,0.0005578973,0.0006474143,0.0033236947,0.0008913526,0.0044551953,0.0011203357,0.0018881101,0.0042516426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13756111,0.0006338324,0.00072422373,0.0016999431,0.0036764492,0.011337311,0.0035601517,0.0017132276,0.00024647993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004457884,0.0005058839,0.27480432,0.0025206194,0.0014563447,0.0022900128,0.046666,0.014563594,0.04024973,0.22338064,0.0034194894,0.38568553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001592236,0.001289664,0.33482394,0.0005327007,0.00061287725,0.0022650415,0.007860581,0.026395287,0.008567635,0.60658747,0.010478961,0.000426557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002032717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014437896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01041219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001156489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008033969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055065572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053346049","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0568-8","title":"Rationality, external norms, and the epistemic value of menus","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Criticism; Value (mathematics); Decision maker; Positive economics; Rational choice theory (criminology); Social psychology; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Economics; Computer science; Management science; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13705170116549992,"score_gpt":0.3743954543775198,"score_spread":0.2373437532120199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053346049","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39228058,0.003493731,0.39864978,0.015552476,0.00021539086,0.00018138076,0.0004307635,0.00021676326,0.1889792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97839296,0.00048816315,0.018481096,0.00024676463,0.000103211816,0.000106805135,0.000056752076,0.00003505589,0.0020892941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98139185,0.013373562,0.00080923707,0.0011098031,0.002398087,0.0009173982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90948653,0.0742251,0.004829228,0.0059996773,0.0037903525,0.0016692023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021576688,0.0008878265,0.0013558845,0.0024644684,0.0021158534,0.010954445,0.0014979352,0.0042663137,0.0074316813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06453116,0.00079817907,0.0010006202,0.0016177932,0.015419281,0.012976517,0.0032327026,0.0037355605,0.0004797214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012894567,0.00006545427,0.00076645176,0.00008472115,0.00005486319,0.000045213714,0.0003607267,0.004383413,0.0002715406,0.9867714,0.00031928913,0.006748131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022714928,0.000011084106,0.00019062175,0.00002124264,0.000013990578,0.0000145594195,0.00008451838,0.0032763353,0.000098024524,0.99585116,0.0004067214,0.000008962342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00100881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012427825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021576688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028493272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019086375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114109814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053520992","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2012.687892","title":"Effects of perspective and belief on analytic reasoning in a scientific reasoning task","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Cognitive psychology; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Test (biology); Dual process theory (moral psychology); Task (project management); Scale (ratio); Artificial intelligence; Moral reasoning; Computer science","score_opus":0.03947755928593623,"score_gpt":0.35931031318835016,"score_spread":0.31983275390241395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053520992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99801433,0.000043949465,0.00048559697,0.00003752034,0.000009213626,0.000026620271,0.000016749933,0.000008664775,0.0013574383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965322,0.00009488629,0.002639258,0.00007931986,0.000020436952,0.00008195647,0.00006384291,0.000016889348,0.0004712409],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955408,0.0022452308,0.00033590267,0.0005466341,0.0011219108,0.00020956522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8566841,0.121095054,0.013973323,0.0040610647,0.0013257816,0.0028606285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006501706,0.00076216314,0.00062372285,0.0007432997,0.00038743808,0.0020586418,0.0005558154,0.0009718816,0.004577287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06796233,0.00051582244,0.00043616432,0.00043217992,0.0011559377,0.0015627539,0.0017222475,0.0019734174,0.0003104749],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.041106533,0.02283471,0.4543585,0.001307775,0.00136757,0.0011312756,0.02109944,0.0032250779,0.3446318,0.00387152,0.0007266321,0.104339264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015374774,0.015161615,0.93366504,0.00015250595,0.00057937,0.0007104089,0.0032202348,0.009709241,0.02677989,0.0071000457,0.0012008444,0.00018325042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031020064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055495335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006501706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033382795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031214408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034384727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054517012","doi":"10.1002/bdm.595","title":"To buy or to sell: cultural differences in stock market decisions based on price trends","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Stock market; Stock (firearms); Stock price; Financial economics; Economics; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.27664190879715905,"score_gpt":0.45870632994063953,"score_spread":0.18206442114348048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054517012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991277,0.000052033745,0.000020352412,0.000037512295,0.0000028991083,0.0000032516004,0.000016325464,2.421821e-7,0.00073975394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99971324,0.00006689933,0.000025843374,0.000027172257,0.0000016913549,0.000002015787,0.000021150558,5.4523633e-7,0.0001414871],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993593,0.00021385067,0.000046996203,0.00006978248,0.00019036967,0.00011973841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99580115,0.0017672015,0.0010360297,0.00019758893,0.00068677246,0.00051134086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015924391,0.00018904009,0.00020153921,0.0007290182,0.0007722791,0.0011983904,0.00022523417,0.00028723723,0.0020051484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062579964,0.00013285887,0.00022439325,0.00072938757,0.0013718336,0.0004105974,0.00041165182,0.00041746418,0.000115075614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044316598,0.00014126353,0.9434353,0.00004900876,0.0001665574,0.00031650628,0.04336597,0.00016339945,0.0018439398,0.00039970706,0.0002786387,0.009396455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014772147,0.00007127078,0.97502613,0.000023746468,0.0000390776,0.00013351972,0.02334384,0.00031178223,0.0002831682,0.00023248639,0.00049548305,0.000024660698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.107925326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16254243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107925326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009370476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087516784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21459424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054821576","doi":"10.1016/s0749-5978(03)00089-x","title":"Planning, personality, and prediction: The role of future focus in optimistic time predictions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Procrastination; Psychology; Focus (optics); Optimism; Task (project management); Trait; Neglect; Personality; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive bias; Optimism bias; Cognition; Big Five personality traits; Social psychology; Debiasing; Computer science","score_opus":0.03458387996993406,"score_gpt":0.33035030470469373,"score_spread":0.29576642473475967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054821576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96907187,0.0029889317,0.0100437375,0.002949372,0.00006903585,0.000021815584,0.00011119747,0.000020159365,0.014723933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99782866,0.00048560437,0.0012300164,0.00007322295,0.000036535283,0.000009632657,0.000027727674,0.000004579067,0.0003039888],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992644,0.0005115645,0.0000197384,0.00007022165,0.000082329425,0.00005169915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96768713,0.026798043,0.0022141165,0.0012305869,0.000759677,0.001310449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040064747,0.00039542097,0.0003294459,0.00060397125,0.000449087,0.0029616542,0.0004170851,0.001115325,0.0030750423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032022264,0.000347954,0.00029521005,0.00079101877,0.001562487,0.0018163925,0.0007808376,0.0014209929,0.00022210293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029668233,0.0014338351,0.69298667,0.0002491821,0.0004920925,0.0004942061,0.004858491,0.02915812,0.0030386369,0.078813866,0.0022731288,0.18323497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014893345,0.0005445149,0.66338825,0.00013520152,0.00030941074,0.00036432318,0.0016266067,0.07024968,0.0007320847,0.26049045,0.0018867601,0.00012382865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028254932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003687972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040064747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052036525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005720407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021188498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054922874","doi":"10.1007/s11166-014-9186-z","title":"Take-up for genetic tests and ambiguity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Pennsylvania State University","keywords":"Ambiguity; Ambiguity aversion; Affect (linguistics); Economics; Test (biology); Value (mathematics); Expected utility hypothesis; Decision maker; Private information retrieval; Subjective expected utility; Ex-ante; Value of information; Outcome (game theory); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Biology; Machine learning","score_opus":0.07214745918230582,"score_gpt":0.3764352568517761,"score_spread":0.3042877976694703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054922874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7236962,0.0027473788,0.18677874,0.031671993,0.0007955326,0.00011945529,0.00058054336,0.0003316379,0.053278532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847265,0.00019998958,0.012402108,0.0006665772,0.00020301713,0.000024385216,0.000056517016,0.000032361222,0.0016886733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98910964,0.005461923,0.00049529626,0.0019088407,0.002099977,0.00092426274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86392623,0.110977896,0.00685729,0.011951955,0.0029667271,0.0033199084],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01847732,0.001125251,0.0026207666,0.0025262644,0.0015384767,0.0053916564,0.0022246672,0.0051919906,0.010728086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17007649,0.00079716585,0.0013858911,0.0015279026,0.008098754,0.010480919,0.004375711,0.004836671,0.00045024883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006508051,0.00020996598,0.039264068,0.00019209618,0.0004905741,0.003621863,0.0015634141,0.008853958,0.0016079048,0.87322,0.0028556501,0.06746965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000447122,0.0000502591,0.0033365737,0.00003006895,0.00005651618,0.00052294723,0.00024200017,0.011438456,0.00045990798,0.98298454,0.0008051129,0.00002885543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011412269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009641016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9815227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001260709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014398764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0977186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055973933","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-50727-9_7","title":"Postulates of Rational Preference","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Preference; Revealed preference; Rationality; Epistemology; Mathematical economics; Von Neumann architecture; Rational choice theory (criminology); Empirical research; Positive economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Economics; Philosophy; Econometrics; Pure mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.4073150163547902,"score_gpt":0.421594037110577,"score_spread":0.014279020755786798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055973933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010337052,0.0075860554,0.18287843,0.011002744,0.000812074,0.000066189474,0.0003053736,0.00012990067,0.7868821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69209296,0.015618828,0.06956699,0.00249394,0.0024252404,0.00051533926,0.00073922286,0.00024344109,0.21630412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990557,0.00036890747,0.000040646944,0.00011100738,0.00034750983,0.00007630495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913675,0.0005310634,0.000047574285,0.0001388768,0.000107727064,0.000038205075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018297406,0.00088112825,0.0006325012,0.0010174987,0.0008355312,0.0032075713,0.001062566,0.001685988,0.010278803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032225486,0.0004289322,0.00055732945,0.0011401485,0.006023048,0.0049487296,0.0011028266,0.0031026702,0.0027577078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013832313,0.000002661411,0.0000070067767,0.000009195454,0.0000015569078,0.0000034189688,0.000030234354,0.00023994756,0.00001763058,0.995836,0.0014926096,0.0023584194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010829208,5.2582214e-7,0.000007974687,0.000005460851,5.753675e-7,0.0000034039253,0.0000070346446,0.00033544636,0.000013425553,0.9959216,0.0037024696,0.0000010100508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011131443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007223357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010278803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002120851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011262144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03438598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056274577","doi":"10.1126/science.1214777","title":"When More Is More","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Computational biology","score_opus":0.2241226963501991,"score_gpt":0.4202479743812988,"score_spread":0.1961252780310997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056274577","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060516247,0.0043578716,0.00064485316,0.9596239,0.0052582566,0.000016208744,0.00012351412,0.000034796623,0.023889031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13191651,0.0051467153,0.0014363278,0.83769614,0.01322929,0.00005222736,0.00007642628,0.00007463629,0.01037174],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656373,0.001571046,0.00020088254,0.00046576082,0.0007225191,0.00047598916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99076337,0.005104408,0.0008141573,0.0005859839,0.0013831087,0.001348948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044142944,0.0003499924,0.0006883174,0.0005023937,0.0019112279,0.0041243974,0.0007516759,0.013532371,0.016373286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025374765,0.00020145506,0.00054770947,0.00045314617,0.004116414,0.004655903,0.0012857444,0.013433961,0.0060120043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016918939,0.00031066814,0.008685443,0.0006286835,0.00017406755,0.004821474,0.0019059954,0.00023167598,0.0042163273,0.065741174,0.76737314,0.14421937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039923278,0.0003167486,0.012362417,0.001069152,0.00016253261,0.0075111017,0.0057688723,0.00069116795,0.0029980321,0.3127949,0.6557526,0.00017337468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018483029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027747129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016373286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022406464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011418985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054774046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057532890","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.001","title":"Money is essential: Ownership intuitions are linked to physical currency","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Currency; Value (mathematics); Monetary economics; Velocity of money; Economics; Psychology; Money measurement concept; Virtual currency; Medium of exchange; Devaluation; Commerce; Endogenous money; Monetary policy; Computer science","score_opus":0.16532815738149167,"score_gpt":0.4136104585457624,"score_spread":0.24828230116427072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057532890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9475609,0.0008400621,0.019021697,0.0037432052,0.00008006413,0.000018239427,0.00010228391,0.000025453122,0.028607951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983163,0.00011498714,0.0010728944,0.000125556,0.000018519371,0.0000044914773,0.00002933334,0.000006366714,0.00031153066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991762,0.0002860642,0.000052867523,0.00018089169,0.0001857063,0.00011829082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850027,0.007980332,0.0035526266,0.0015390386,0.0009690081,0.0009564391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022857406,0.00033154592,0.0004634053,0.00075128954,0.00049092894,0.0039151083,0.00056006317,0.0014233143,0.0062166033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025816524,0.00039567417,0.00041051832,0.0005914662,0.0034416083,0.007174885,0.0017191594,0.0014870543,0.0002862211],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020991748,0.0010035172,0.14292327,0.0006824056,0.00066956005,0.001047077,0.007129296,0.014037854,0.009140253,0.734307,0.0038304154,0.08313022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008015196,0.000116008996,0.08192281,0.000058794532,0.000103976796,0.00025728982,0.0014006128,0.008908403,0.0008591309,0.9046914,0.0015446122,0.000056743917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090376573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074576633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062166033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005353025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000542225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020796657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057837355","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.08.012","title":"Effects of cigarette smoking status on delay discounting in schizophrenia and healthy controls","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Addictive Behaviors","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Health Canada","keywords":"Delay discounting; Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming); Cigarette smoking; Psychology; Discounting; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Impulsivity; Psychiatry; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.059359211605640984,"score_gpt":0.34760865621068276,"score_spread":0.28824944460504176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057837355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998522,0.000017935232,0.000007899722,0.0000059129966,0.000001344855,0.0000012106555,0.000048287704,7.683294e-7,0.00006453043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975187,0.000017228085,0.00001624221,0.0000035165724,0.0000014393389,0.0000012234374,0.000058698315,0.0000010139828,0.00014871075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981517,0.00004024782,0.000025541189,0.000047714766,0.000026235553,0.00004521776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983645,0.0005096948,0.0003725531,0.000111347224,0.00008608885,0.0005558608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042782267,0.0005142478,0.0004203207,0.0011036153,0.00043976033,0.0006462427,0.0002519344,0.00052028266,0.0022871003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00191413,0.00027989538,0.0003662792,0.00041876236,0.0005824055,0.0003410485,0.00045082154,0.000498804,0.00016477107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.021894297,0.0014811546,0.95382214,0.000028416327,0.00025291403,0.0008891289,0.00073761685,0.00024812986,0.016215112,0.00016198635,0.000068885565,0.0042003044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056383284,0.00059262913,0.9982552,0.000001597661,0.000056270692,0.00017534062,0.00020435157,0.00027454487,0.00026794677,0.00008112351,0.000026307727,0.000008411951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018328836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011042741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018328836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005341483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029101747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036444306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058559675","doi":"10.1037/a0023493","title":"Choice by value encoding and value construction: Processes of loss aversion.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Loss aversion; Value (mathematics); Encoding (memory); Economics; Tracing; Process (computing); Point (geometry); Cognition; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.1435569179202225,"score_gpt":0.43169264435010923,"score_spread":0.2881357264298867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058559675","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4418559,0.002369371,0.5046355,0.0061425986,0.00016435327,0.00017654877,0.00017547733,0.00021645734,0.04426378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95344377,0.00052462734,0.043567862,0.0003618234,0.000057082332,0.00009598334,0.00006229687,0.000034254903,0.0018522601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786645,0.0010421001,0.00009122558,0.00032621349,0.00052717095,0.00014681593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853924,0.008433572,0.0025861226,0.0023395251,0.00076084485,0.00048752688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047431802,0.0004140058,0.00046503902,0.000811335,0.0005133858,0.0038420672,0.0008135255,0.0013723341,0.0037877776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029257277,0.00041093043,0.0011857344,0.0008338856,0.004269323,0.0071905465,0.0025522802,0.002667269,0.0003532897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043048777,0.00019028685,0.010034186,0.00019355459,0.00010270729,0.0002348412,0.0025317282,0.0045920364,0.0105511015,0.90054023,0.0008813135,0.06971739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003633479,0.00012522198,0.0076043494,0.000041236646,0.000056742476,0.00032157352,0.0002691553,0.026677758,0.0031480459,0.95956033,0.0021101972,0.00004901234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005100933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003656902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047431802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010741303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000577639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025084615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058762417","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.04.019","title":"Delay discounting rates: A strong prognostic indicator of smoking relapse","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Addictive Behaviors","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; National Center for Research Resources; National Institute of General Medical Sciences; National Institute on Drug Abuse; National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Delay discounting; Impulsivity; Barratt Impulsiveness Scale; Hazard ratio; Discounting; Nicotine; Perceived Stress Scale; Psychology; Proportional hazards model; Clinical psychology; Confidence interval; Medicine; Demography; Internal medicine; Stress (linguistics)","score_opus":0.06541762475443866,"score_gpt":0.3803476065844001,"score_spread":0.31492998182996146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058762417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966556,0.0006153511,0.0010858398,0.00019221958,0.000029410154,0.000012814192,0.00032541237,0.000013742233,0.0010695356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992229,0.00017234322,0.0002815376,0.000015318725,0.00002335047,0.0000026073974,0.00010838105,0.0000031227032,0.00017047008],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957937,0.00016651735,0.00005699647,0.000069749665,0.00007730737,0.000050081657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98515505,0.0069862544,0.0048163957,0.0011674039,0.00046237416,0.0014125182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019745945,0.00049684936,0.00050840987,0.0007240515,0.00024942888,0.00094977935,0.000368903,0.00079953636,0.0019427245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015983336,0.00023714073,0.0004587834,0.0005255069,0.0003223996,0.00064563943,0.00036557642,0.0019373484,0.00026609807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014908258,0.0002708331,0.98774534,0.000027277965,0.00016027167,0.00009026957,0.000036711484,0.0010051094,0.00076949695,0.0003573429,0.0001171379,0.007929342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004444737,0.0008489704,0.974484,0.000031612366,0.00035018093,0.0009451473,0.000093716975,0.017557964,0.001326973,0.0038023419,0.00047253532,0.000042061984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011237228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012815734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019745945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026945552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046621542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010442793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058941826","doi":"10.2308/ajpt-10180","title":"Does Time Constraint Lead to Poorer Audit Performance? Effects of Forewarning of Impending Time Constraints and Instructions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Particle Physics","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Task (project management); Warning system; Constraint (computer-aided design); Computer science; Time constraint; Performance audit; Response time; Accounting; Operations management; Business; Internal audit; Joint audit; Economics; Engineering; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.03663617092621924,"score_gpt":0.32887178716782506,"score_spread":0.2922356162416058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058941826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99897575,0.000044480283,0.00027263074,0.000081709775,0.000007815557,0.00001519503,0.000021202826,0.000009562415,0.00057164684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99888736,0.000038044593,0.0006330329,0.00007571326,0.000007401549,0.000031037354,0.000026779537,0.000007871292,0.00029276835],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787664,0.0010611905,0.00022280937,0.00024596934,0.00039018007,0.00020317538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88324064,0.08554336,0.021427399,0.0060762786,0.0010258044,0.0026865338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030382064,0.00031435702,0.0005237278,0.00023808522,0.00025233632,0.000997197,0.0007256278,0.00097414356,0.0062856805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040495656,0.00043036503,0.0002887215,0.00019838876,0.0008653966,0.000950571,0.000703501,0.0018924908,0.0003342907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10900104,0.02673875,0.36259785,0.0011672685,0.0007471237,0.0015146689,0.004778786,0.009488731,0.37861043,0.0040931334,0.0011667877,0.100095384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018487492,0.025930926,0.8961227,0.00017968821,0.0004313527,0.00042518368,0.0014623255,0.008560057,0.057126954,0.0059844316,0.0017413489,0.00018619851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012182983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011629028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062856805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036634743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000646154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021027625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059574116","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0123740","title":"The Effect of Time Pressure on Risky Financial Decisions from Description and Decisions from Experience","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Risk-seeking; Actuarial science; Risk analysis (engineering); Economics; Psychology; Econometrics; Finance; Medicine","score_opus":0.2101182564957566,"score_gpt":0.34751355669183087,"score_spread":0.13739530019607427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059574116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99563783,0.0001407176,0.0005788716,0.00007531065,0.00002458573,0.000034910725,0.00006074949,0.000008079912,0.0034390339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962819,0.00016737856,0.0018171909,0.00009927373,0.00003591944,0.00014945978,0.00012294122,0.000016729118,0.0013092379],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974663,0.0011548492,0.00018191429,0.00027809019,0.00069615134,0.00022255046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95997137,0.030115353,0.004038555,0.0017882226,0.00068327406,0.0034032783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026355817,0.0005291939,0.00055779156,0.0003596372,0.00038526946,0.0016891051,0.00043821163,0.0008136243,0.009156501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02513069,0.00030296677,0.00043587084,0.00032030835,0.0007703816,0.001057828,0.0011827884,0.0014981691,0.0003910392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.090096176,0.04244694,0.27092996,0.0023771343,0.0014225977,0.0021930765,0.008972768,0.0110018635,0.2860265,0.01141232,0.0023966671,0.2707241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018287731,0.0394232,0.8947895,0.00025630658,0.0005927567,0.0007801712,0.002097854,0.011231562,0.02751712,0.015363853,0.0057695527,0.00034940062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048419213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005941579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009156501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035376393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041001238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030631542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059764265","doi":"10.1007/s001990100207","title":"Subjective ambiguity, expected utility and Choquet expected utility","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Axiom; Choquet integral; Expected utility hypothesis; Subjective expected utility; Mathematical economics; Decision maker; Simple (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Key (lock); Measure (data warehouse); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Data mining","score_opus":0.14138795755228675,"score_gpt":0.35802778432695087,"score_spread":0.21663982677466412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059764265","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13953672,0.035027955,0.7452074,0.010332655,0.0007448928,0.00011469215,0.0002743597,0.00006482252,0.06869653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93540967,0.008468409,0.049445674,0.0004389927,0.0009582823,0.00016892988,0.00012151387,0.000029673532,0.004958856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941269,0.0035815006,0.00030018997,0.0004973007,0.0011939075,0.00030028415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662267,0.028393086,0.0020637724,0.0010577362,0.001597476,0.00066127494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009624621,0.0012180269,0.0020538226,0.0023194419,0.0008974672,0.0062510767,0.001431717,0.0036799998,0.004072179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048818823,0.00070238725,0.0009658916,0.0031790517,0.007014957,0.011148607,0.002074401,0.0029449821,0.00031061497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003744968,0.000026143494,0.0005170844,0.000111964364,0.000034354063,0.000046321693,0.00025148102,0.0044541364,0.0001015249,0.98868364,0.0003531936,0.0053827125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075364546,0.000011138296,0.00026041912,0.000024993764,0.000011236312,0.000026983627,0.000055795943,0.0071355463,0.000026604022,0.9919423,0.00048468754,0.000012758713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010510545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077777647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009624621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019441489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010898712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05090046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059998814","doi":"10.1080/02699931003593942","title":"Negative emotions can attenuate the influence of beliefs on logical reasoning","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition & Emotion","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Syllogism; Content (measure theory); Affect (linguistics); Consistency (knowledge bases); Scrutiny; Contrast (vision); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Logical reasoning; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09933546512834393,"score_gpt":0.37330175466992443,"score_spread":0.27396628954158053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059998814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970932,0.000087744265,0.0005796308,0.000105089974,0.000013167296,0.000007881523,0.000010847103,0.00000976168,0.0020925635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984646,0.000101542566,0.00083258987,0.00009038776,0.000012292085,0.000017266111,0.000015896097,0.000012342123,0.00045313576],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931085,0.00031207872,0.0000462332,0.00008570199,0.00016905273,0.00007611016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954039,0.0028331638,0.00093830266,0.00038386096,0.00016337709,0.0002774337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078569364,0.0002744743,0.00028095598,0.00011542629,0.0001445409,0.00069291174,0.00015160163,0.00025577343,0.00235358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007287929,0.00019568477,0.00015753401,0.000056372857,0.00044983227,0.00026579355,0.00055176404,0.000835827,0.00020389303],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008440047,0.002376113,0.031720676,0.000332235,0.0002371862,0.0004938737,0.00297273,0.00095160934,0.8816755,0.0021478885,0.00058832276,0.0680638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001002775,0.008494107,0.7181059,0.00015013183,0.00059329666,0.0006893667,0.0017444413,0.010974321,0.2393446,0.013668561,0.00512067,0.00011192296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024150827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027765162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00235358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017349153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014544842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007873535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060242101","doi":"10.1080/10517120903000363","title":"Purchasing Higher-Value, Higher-Price Offerings in Business Markets","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Purchasing; Ambiguity; Value (mathematics); Incentive; Marketing; Business; Revenue; Construct (python library); Business value; Empirical evidence; Empirical research; Microeconomics; Economics; Industrial organization; Accounting","score_opus":0.05685151412834891,"score_gpt":0.34777481226170015,"score_spread":0.29092329813335127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060242101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9455681,0.00018610967,0.017932994,0.0013304191,0.000021704132,0.00037028934,0.00003304077,0.000037744794,0.034519553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99500567,0.000050819322,0.00438628,0.00013022767,0.0000063317157,0.00008278122,0.000012231955,0.0000037893408,0.00032191325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961791,0.0022101258,0.00014263536,0.00030939525,0.00089090073,0.00026788676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833577,0.010222444,0.003960719,0.0009156853,0.000722691,0.0008206765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069563505,0.00041719308,0.00044548482,0.000854537,0.0012877462,0.0039562862,0.0009306725,0.0019521799,0.00673135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018941406,0.00038207113,0.0005863967,0.0005736852,0.004428464,0.0060439515,0.0018773664,0.0017683569,0.00029599943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013791817,0.0068833465,0.2869983,0.00095426093,0.00013588573,0.001180011,0.050550077,0.006686891,0.012902584,0.5362577,0.001362438,0.09470938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082313607,0.005082555,0.46907842,0.00081629853,0.00033881713,0.0015883561,0.05758569,0.07355272,0.008069192,0.36782745,0.014906138,0.00033122418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013236363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013413964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069563505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026793645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022086105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03678918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061532330","doi":"10.1006/jmps.2000.1357","title":"Random Relations, Random Utilities, and Random Functions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Complement (music); Mathematics; Random element; Random variable; Measure (data warehouse); Metric (unit); Sample space; Random function; Probability measure; Function (biology); Binary relation; Binary number; Respondent; Discrete mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Data mining; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.1565933696493799,"score_gpt":0.4396660119605228,"score_spread":0.28307264231114293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061532330","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10801631,0.010348318,0.8438235,0.009896716,0.00031271618,0.00010146624,0.00033336767,0.00015038933,0.027017256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90174985,0.0056710537,0.08152192,0.00096296816,0.000829711,0.00036419617,0.00030781495,0.00008337261,0.00850925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915863,0.005995568,0.0002646258,0.00072798505,0.0009530295,0.00047244792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93261033,0.05969183,0.0028488124,0.00245988,0.0015249109,0.00086431514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011402519,0.001151768,0.0019289366,0.0027581719,0.0010817441,0.0049871253,0.001586888,0.0027092837,0.005239428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05246317,0.00089094933,0.0012492762,0.002719512,0.0067783175,0.013276436,0.0016923501,0.0033864279,0.00063463335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021198408,0.000018652445,0.00029607854,0.000041335046,0.000023854658,0.000029405823,0.00009232226,0.0055194637,0.000053579544,0.9894029,0.0004651351,0.0040361257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072177845,0.000005703827,0.00012221959,0.000009521027,0.0000075164894,0.000021574418,0.000018965944,0.011217769,0.0000198581,0.9881896,0.00037341547,0.000006662182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015870611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001200512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011402519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017628219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010992027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060302973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061592058","doi":"10.1142/9789814417358_0016","title":"Choices, Values, and Frames","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"World Scientific handbook in financial economic series","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5411,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.06283925947885162,"score_gpt":0.3116454462296101,"score_spread":0.2488061867507585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061592058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021236472,0.021849586,0.051905006,0.008606092,0.0006003152,0.00006122893,0.00025954968,0.00005814014,0.89542353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7749164,0.024004024,0.03587616,0.0017152857,0.0009417779,0.00025407044,0.0004928569,0.00009436933,0.16170506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993672,0.00025429935,0.000022065264,0.00012126917,0.00014692181,0.00008829195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999742,0.000114047085,0.000026302798,0.00003352793,0.000043534925,0.00004060526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008088247,0.0005547651,0.00029064316,0.00071977236,0.0016344968,0.004490433,0.00058507884,0.0010696658,0.008377363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013302915,0.0001827034,0.00023507506,0.0010370086,0.0075637884,0.0051615667,0.0013888169,0.0016009863,0.0013635274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026700027,0.0000031187878,0.000042122156,0.000008388331,7.6028476e-7,0.000011934985,0.00043346587,0.0001032076,0.000043942946,0.9929792,0.0012830278,0.005088137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017177701,0.0000066001135,0.00012216378,0.000044710403,0.0000013331966,0.000034703964,0.00043780755,0.00025657535,0.00006362246,0.9345799,0.06444659,0.000004354067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002334514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016226141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008377363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001870328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006614209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02802509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062195281","doi":"10.1177/0146167202239041","title":"Younger Achievement Age Predicts Shorter Life for Governors: Testing the Precocity-Longevity Hypothesis With Artifact Controls","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Longevity; Life expectancy; Psychology; Artifact (error); Expectancy theory; Demography; Life span; Test (biology); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Gerontology; Biology; Medicine; Population","score_opus":0.25249491907979255,"score_gpt":0.3877270803772464,"score_spread":0.13523216129745386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062195281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995347,0.00001990645,0.0002184988,0.000026086902,0.0000041680605,0.0000048669795,0.000051760304,0.0000018651995,0.00013817934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997037,0.0000073230285,0.00008356524,0.0000054467273,0.0000070124433,0.0000060892166,0.00007234156,0.0000011236184,0.00011330675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766123,0.0012819333,0.00016501127,0.00035924482,0.00026821753,0.00026447148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9648699,0.018590285,0.008890187,0.0051358477,0.0010363177,0.0014774133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005686115,0.00028371965,0.0003187754,0.0007667464,0.0005964817,0.0007863381,0.00058377185,0.00043326066,0.0031682989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023920795,0.00015588169,0.0005437583,0.0005323257,0.0009128646,0.0004756047,0.000836647,0.0006630004,0.00022672601],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024748273,0.000065446635,0.99744654,0.0000031281736,0.000064935964,0.000056854242,0.00015710869,0.00013337891,0.00009203816,0.000243422,0.000063974905,0.0014256835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023398306,0.00031654182,0.99640614,0.0000022781978,0.000070960516,0.00009946799,0.00026549547,0.0020663003,0.00021942507,0.00025091553,0.00027400054,0.000004972085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063561364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040734867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063561364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032883591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004400579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030071437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063479817","doi":"10.1007/s11238-007-9065-z","title":"Utility of Gambling when Events are Valued: an Application of Inset Entropy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Entropy (arrow of time); Binary entropy function; Mathematical economics; Utility theory; Statistics; Principle of maximum entropy","score_opus":0.12925279367505316,"score_gpt":0.42914729220514236,"score_spread":0.2998944985300892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063479817","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4123551,0.00091496203,0.560748,0.0016543064,0.00017190119,0.000087519315,0.0003579397,0.00014892976,0.023561308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811453,0.00030462348,0.016587518,0.000057397818,0.000097869015,0.000041363157,0.00007442194,0.000025395739,0.0016660652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986706,0.0008107801,0.00006788644,0.00015284006,0.00017346008,0.00012447513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97744066,0.019929243,0.0005914006,0.0010134499,0.00056107127,0.00046407565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038045214,0.000410442,0.0011356772,0.0013659311,0.00043308374,0.00171802,0.001051423,0.0010319513,0.0039257314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02345974,0.00036277488,0.0008946604,0.0012580857,0.0025461647,0.0046420423,0.0018052866,0.0014117158,0.00014506128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021614601,0.00009666224,0.0069428794,0.00011999766,0.00010966458,0.00020998657,0.00041956297,0.07220468,0.0009095463,0.8941247,0.0010212664,0.02362491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013905481,0.00003686844,0.0028491654,0.00003164714,0.00003513941,0.00012137874,0.0001101953,0.27706215,0.00021954403,0.7191104,0.0003825846,0.000026991618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013165427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010237669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039257314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010685938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055850495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020120442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063976265","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2006.11.001","title":"Consumption–leisure nonseparabilities in asset market participants’ preferences","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Monetary Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Asset (computer security); Consumption (sociology); Econometrics; Panel data; Sample (material); Permanent income hypothesis; Microeconomics; Financial economics; Finance; Market liquidity; Computer science","score_opus":0.2275205569344006,"score_gpt":0.4053023670920823,"score_spread":0.17778181015768169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063976265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99085754,0.000054513293,0.006442226,0.0003397498,0.0000037796408,0.000005371784,0.000029749655,0.000005239491,0.0022617318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990544,0.000028464161,0.0005271908,0.000018464472,0.000004938058,0.0000057313896,0.000021482454,0.0000021549213,0.00033727518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994299,0.0003058351,0.000024652505,0.00007605174,0.00004814277,0.00011537875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836227,0.013553353,0.00088966213,0.00070502074,0.0003764005,0.00085287995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033657455,0.0002060691,0.0005102876,0.0004399945,0.00038562808,0.00215321,0.00046504257,0.001004479,0.0058965054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016886977,0.00042150437,0.0004455141,0.0005242195,0.0014313045,0.0031253505,0.0010228904,0.0017656148,0.0003321296],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009070362,0.0015920416,0.22821024,0.00030767414,0.00064947485,0.0020687722,0.007076371,0.0497805,0.015646804,0.6051028,0.0017350367,0.07875993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046695222,0.0005271005,0.18279217,0.000030561667,0.00015898328,0.000553428,0.0035630101,0.18814766,0.0013953042,0.62170535,0.00055967027,0.000099824974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011864993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011681224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058965054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044872923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003534177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0197258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064245470","doi":"10.3758/s13423-013-0542-9","title":"Remembering the best and worst of times: Memories for extreme outcomes bias risky decisions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Gambling Research Institute, University of Calgary; National Research Council Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Psychology; Recall; Outcome (game theory); Social psychology; Task (project management); Salient; Cognitive psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.3309553820656819,"score_gpt":0.42014273025082266,"score_spread":0.08918734818514074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064245470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8070126,0.166532,0.008811799,0.006285427,0.0007739097,0.00006726919,0.0005645324,0.00007888851,0.00987341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9409787,0.05282914,0.0024890625,0.0011792456,0.0009850377,0.000026402438,0.00031744476,0.000022620236,0.001172439],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997603,0.00005521105,0.0000283018,0.000062942214,0.00007103424,0.00002218802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99212015,0.0046879537,0.0018283344,0.0005654123,0.0005415415,0.00025663956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009991784,0.0002963312,0.0005421183,0.0004667911,0.00016809886,0.0012470423,0.0006074645,0.000857285,0.0023300003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01209945,0.00024183038,0.00027749577,0.0006404641,0.000639306,0.0013727766,0.00036829142,0.0011640276,0.0003299224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019221215,0.00025509423,0.14098902,0.0025122191,0.0009943076,0.0006171059,0.0018238042,0.0012585167,0.0120537765,0.0060079424,0.007097517,0.82446855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029382028,0.0008528693,0.8709965,0.0014336061,0.0016284027,0.0048017567,0.0022266193,0.003407376,0.009178786,0.06924366,0.035700332,0.00023624033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089135644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011775038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023300003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032870114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031158808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0077946186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064661564","doi":"10.1002/mar.20162","title":"Developing heuristic‐based quality judgments: Blocking in consumer choice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychology and Marketing","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Quality (philosophy); Blocking (statistics); Affect (linguistics); Product (mathematics); Order (exchange); Heuristic; Psychology; Process (computing); Advertising; Block (permutation group theory); Marketing; Information quality; Computer science; Business; Information system; Artificial intelligence; Communication","score_opus":0.2684398167341324,"score_gpt":0.5225066344660648,"score_spread":0.2540668177319324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064661564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9370032,0.0004623285,0.042511914,0.00057399896,0.000040316794,0.00024146056,0.00005683178,0.00019201224,0.018917862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98117375,0.0001839027,0.017266655,0.00015481169,0.000017493336,0.00009234015,0.000044458044,0.000052627838,0.0010139556],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926341,0.0042587738,0.00028214365,0.000575438,0.0019441161,0.00030546103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9001198,0.08003236,0.007633241,0.007707065,0.002811541,0.0016960622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012027007,0.00042580743,0.0006656557,0.00043643275,0.00056072307,0.0024226026,0.00061768113,0.0011018115,0.004068951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060365167,0.0006766707,0.00032992274,0.00037497058,0.0017760975,0.0022721782,0.0012727476,0.0018158099,0.00058834936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012841135,0.0048669847,0.12612016,0.0016905928,0.00047717904,0.00065476605,0.022385066,0.024729462,0.3527723,0.18500794,0.003147411,0.26530692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002387559,0.0048296386,0.18629418,0.00045117948,0.0007322622,0.000933613,0.0033278822,0.24201547,0.15234907,0.3805668,0.025517743,0.00059455197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021736016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012723149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012027007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010662626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015776039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063605666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066188514","doi":"10.1007/s11238-012-9348-x","title":"Emotional balance and probability weighting","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"National Taiwan University","keywords":"Weighting; Balance (ability); Normative; Balance theory; Psychology; Econometrics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Physics; Political science","score_opus":0.08542908166859771,"score_gpt":0.3755244638367624,"score_spread":0.2900953821681647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066188514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43820846,0.0023026988,0.4264788,0.008142762,0.00039207557,0.00010887712,0.00010571156,0.00008484455,0.124175794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831777,0.0003234925,0.011474724,0.0003042013,0.00013655145,0.000056375204,0.00003595379,0.000020705602,0.0044703316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791497,0.0011295687,0.00010033311,0.0002344723,0.0004161878,0.00020446494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916129,0.005903936,0.00070097635,0.000505431,0.00080407655,0.000472681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034024834,0.00045259233,0.00054921606,0.0011742511,0.0005822243,0.00315646,0.0006028251,0.0011320319,0.009805348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022928234,0.0003101057,0.00047087783,0.00081950094,0.0018277926,0.003960573,0.0014247199,0.0012471041,0.00051300944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000296289,0.00020748992,0.004785973,0.00012666512,0.00014229286,0.00013410847,0.00070267677,0.010775369,0.0022475347,0.8974917,0.0016437034,0.08144626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022294063,0.000040217623,0.0032687893,0.000015498726,0.00003511984,0.000064903834,0.0001713763,0.017966652,0.0003404557,0.97680444,0.0012557992,0.0000145114645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044663515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032148315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009805348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083531474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034927207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032802165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066502531","doi":"10.1108/10610421011086892","title":"Consumer perceptions of ambiguous price promotions: scratch and save promotions versus tensile price claims","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Product & Brand Management","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Marketing; Originality; Value (mathematics); Advertising; Perception; Economics; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06286572568324492,"score_gpt":0.3672024036046912,"score_spread":0.30433667792144625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066502531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99823797,0.00004431394,0.00014699531,0.00007058296,0.000005439063,0.0000103414895,0.000008560372,0.0000022413487,0.0014736088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930286,0.000054112563,0.0002289692,0.00009361519,0.000007652188,0.0000095297255,0.000017321248,0.0000021375172,0.00028387833],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891496,0.00038586688,0.00005774321,0.00009434878,0.00046460942,0.00008244195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945738,0.002524352,0.0018537496,0.00021375925,0.00046332204,0.00037111514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016525798,0.00027788838,0.00024573845,0.00034027296,0.0004302414,0.0022755382,0.00020352281,0.00085621065,0.0036400743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064614965,0.00020883352,0.00041896777,0.00022528763,0.001260487,0.0011045071,0.00074351823,0.0011727175,0.00023669911],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046152337,0.0030067165,0.8326558,0.0008233336,0.0003494636,0.0011321314,0.08073366,0.0007737064,0.031068541,0.0034699824,0.0011401145,0.04023128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013496388,0.001741193,0.9141455,0.00015426196,0.00019095828,0.00044964155,0.07505026,0.0015994032,0.0025935513,0.0015198438,0.0023189874,0.00010141968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015506587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016584252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036400743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038186557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021964803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0121772885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067023889","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2011.09.002","title":"Failing to commit: Maximizers avoid commitment in a way that contributes to reduced satisfaction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personality and Individual Differences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Satisficing; Commit; Cognitive dissonance; Psychology; Social psychology; Preference; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.3897874075789352,"score_gpt":0.3802634405871916,"score_spread":0.009523966991743626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067023889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99746466,0.000020430145,0.0005945999,0.00016484995,0.000011456207,0.0000069813673,0.000013056788,0.000006777914,0.001717273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983847,0.00001686452,0.000517878,0.0000782194,0.0000070060437,0.000009138493,0.000023092696,0.0000061743976,0.00095687964],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993507,0.0002623989,0.000041282536,0.00007044504,0.00011969468,0.0001554084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961688,0.00065567676,0.0012319584,0.00050657446,0.00021517262,0.001221778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015604397,0.0003116273,0.0003139916,0.00030810238,0.0005448366,0.0016545091,0.00024521162,0.00061445765,0.004527222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005760722,0.00025976135,0.00019032856,0.00028225465,0.00048047767,0.0003995451,0.00072453887,0.0012732272,0.00059108634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018349793,0.0031664805,0.81017166,0.0001865456,0.00044754913,0.00096445286,0.0031069862,0.0036764045,0.07605764,0.00864464,0.0039578406,0.08778484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016284948,0.002133831,0.9636201,0.00005059513,0.00014466835,0.0013057617,0.0032794008,0.008781842,0.0051791994,0.012543349,0.0027487443,0.00004956186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044019357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007930638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004527222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021064734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040158592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015145004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067563274","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2011.07.006","title":"Cardinal versus ordinal criteria in choice under risk with disconnected utility ranges","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Irrational number; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematics; Range (aeronautics); Subjective expected utility; Outcome (game theory); Certainty; Expected value; Preference; Function (biology); Econometrics; Statistics","score_opus":0.28101133384067,"score_gpt":0.4006125456551103,"score_spread":0.11960121181444028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067563274","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40026546,0.002405359,0.55878615,0.0051564164,0.00015281279,0.00011819848,0.0002618362,0.00011081472,0.03274288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9319183,0.0005074679,0.064643994,0.00016948015,0.00014757586,0.00015315518,0.00012015695,0.00004485375,0.002295021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870631,0.008466204,0.000797533,0.0009617974,0.002194895,0.00051648804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90477675,0.084136136,0.0037672087,0.0024808864,0.0023362818,0.002502674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014945142,0.00086513936,0.0019407765,0.0037416592,0.0015355875,0.008464411,0.0018628095,0.0027826538,0.004973262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077677846,0.00083616044,0.0017315231,0.0037636166,0.010083978,0.019376768,0.005400931,0.0037744415,0.0003286485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013699365,0.000029935734,0.00094363804,0.00008396717,0.000025768859,0.00011901386,0.00042824176,0.007791499,0.00019163355,0.9837039,0.00021097269,0.0063344464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025335252,0.000021940788,0.00022593193,0.000024561787,0.000011816306,0.00006777253,0.0001450565,0.018592123,0.000065353524,0.98048085,0.00032497296,0.000014303788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007111358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005538015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014945142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021013871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076999224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07903838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067959363","doi":"10.5334/pb-48-4-283","title":"The Effects of Instructions on Reasoning with Stereotypical Premises","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychologica Belgica","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Belgica; Psychology; Association (psychology); Applied psychology; Social psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.06025698013853421,"score_gpt":0.39362255391381495,"score_spread":0.33336557377528075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067959363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876936,0.0006204341,0.00084432156,0.0005156469,0.00034921826,0.00020022749,0.00035515873,0.00016567764,0.009255768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98405045,0.0007881307,0.0035225207,0.00053986465,0.00017307783,0.0004003258,0.001044633,0.0003433854,0.009137726],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960663,0.0019141694,0.00047151427,0.000613701,0.00063776504,0.0002965644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79456925,0.18188938,0.011463924,0.0059605334,0.0020566573,0.004060229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004891564,0.0013525061,0.0011446483,0.00064350344,0.0005682887,0.002915391,0.0017448864,0.0022175594,0.02773716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13510579,0.00095019746,0.0008341323,0.00044686964,0.0010338427,0.0024722703,0.0016817389,0.003787528,0.0024239952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.41469955,0.06372421,0.047276977,0.0042433324,0.0018140262,0.0013419975,0.010055195,0.014717679,0.09932762,0.008102312,0.015914433,0.3187827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06687826,0.107862964,0.52203244,0.0030460653,0.005590507,0.001557306,0.0061296,0.10927339,0.054547153,0.09455061,0.027168516,0.0013633296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032979634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024381587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02773716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093007233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016343256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09279007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068077127","doi":"10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00515-7","title":"An evidential support accumulation model of subjective probability","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.46493024468392175,"score_gpt":0.5474355811487335,"score_spread":0.08250533646481173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068077127","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11438279,0.0008192062,0.8455836,0.007053212,0.00015685108,0.0000712592,0.0004277151,0.00019178816,0.031313546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393218,0.00056365,0.04919005,0.00021411414,0.00031578512,0.000078298974,0.00015895156,0.000031763946,0.01012557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986211,0.00056844676,0.00007491675,0.00024497116,0.0003504231,0.0001401463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847348,0.010503875,0.001163091,0.0015555065,0.0015183636,0.00052448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037123198,0.000693983,0.00096084893,0.0013935454,0.00076578034,0.0036605787,0.0029571042,0.0023995475,0.008298667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029296916,0.0005688908,0.0008516305,0.0015229638,0.0022742255,0.009436682,0.0016105429,0.0024516084,0.00083481614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041511088,0.000042991294,0.00054309744,0.00003880537,0.000017638595,0.0001167142,0.00018273016,0.027690336,0.00018204033,0.96053946,0.000937445,0.00966731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012533928,0.000013434664,0.0002203995,0.000008949688,0.0000114901795,0.000040687926,0.000018725043,0.13765317,0.00006714462,0.86135864,0.00058606314,0.000008855912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021658775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017375719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008298667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012075192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010588055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027761817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068575306","doi":"10.3758/bf03196883","title":"Dilution and confirmation of probability judgments based on nondiagnostic evidence","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Dilution; Contrast (vision); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Physics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.23704983544421054,"score_gpt":0.4016666025871041,"score_spread":0.16461676714289358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068575306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90120685,0.0029921366,0.058858264,0.0069095907,0.00065674883,0.00031485426,0.0003796792,0.0003654251,0.028316591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988167,0.000320448,0.009611717,0.00047211006,0.00029195184,0.00004682889,0.00014442924,0.00003202862,0.0009137036],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9659709,0.0141590955,0.0037967865,0.005622892,0.009167296,0.0012829653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2295314,0.6636321,0.033347562,0.04854031,0.02051542,0.0044333213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061985187,0.0012288041,0.0019425055,0.0041244286,0.0014318853,0.00611122,0.0034585965,0.0053087925,0.008177044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.54153675,0.0011789432,0.0014324527,0.0012847399,0.007662615,0.0114041865,0.004876297,0.003724107,0.0007711455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03827993,0.001995557,0.32187888,0.0032727052,0.0028285522,0.005212033,0.004507319,0.016494516,0.04204852,0.25242278,0.0063057803,0.30475345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002019069,0.0018635282,0.11462791,0.0005022736,0.0012673689,0.003703701,0.00084333314,0.07519159,0.05488633,0.73831105,0.0063992753,0.00038461946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011776659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001053518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061985187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017888517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002243864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3278129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068737255","doi":"10.1506/l5la-l863-cf9k-wej5","title":"A Note on the Relation between Frames, Perceptions, and Taxpayer Behavior*","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Perception; Function (biology); Cognition; Order (exchange); Social psychology; Psychology; Public economics; Economics","score_opus":0.30446379298876824,"score_gpt":0.47939591042466245,"score_spread":0.1749321174358942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068737255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893468,0.00015818536,0.0014243848,0.00046867077,0.000016498485,0.000017751885,0.00005109981,0.000007797145,0.008508785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900573,0.000065232765,0.0005573974,0.00004207918,0.000009513174,0.00000909313,0.00002559151,0.0000027618328,0.00028262605],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982534,0.0011297488,0.00006823198,0.00015504837,0.0003005817,0.00009305577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9358228,0.052161325,0.006759416,0.0022919895,0.0017286141,0.0012358102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040241024,0.00021577819,0.0002205603,0.0007323927,0.00057256105,0.0018249308,0.00022778666,0.00045818975,0.0051809656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027692012,0.00014631684,0.0003741823,0.0006083333,0.00090297643,0.0010499146,0.0008048176,0.0011475721,0.00018418314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031425912,0.000294182,0.9669212,0.00005013972,0.00015090143,0.00006841591,0.0057640336,0.00059772236,0.0012813043,0.0071849506,0.0003219657,0.017050909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010208627,0.0002162359,0.98637205,0.000033243145,0.00010302131,0.000058718586,0.004564525,0.002958258,0.00054673705,0.004057264,0.0010552419,0.00002451156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052690506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045616645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052690506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005250301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056834833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02128172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068787935","doi":"10.3917/cca.111.0023","title":"Caractéristiques de l'information, surcharge d'information et qualité de la prédiction","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Diction; Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03601035421984589,"score_gpt":0.38275648399141754,"score_spread":0.34674612977157165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068787935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9271567,0.0034675917,0.02339197,0.005612666,0.00012424961,0.00028040053,0.0011360057,0.00033495986,0.038495388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868069,0.00083158066,0.0075526005,0.00025719363,0.000062486135,0.00006704633,0.00043290434,0.000027026103,0.0039622793],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884242,0.0044074776,0.0006886772,0.0011390635,0.004700244,0.000640267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7890769,0.17463651,0.012150437,0.006268392,0.015736591,0.002131253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016093653,0.0007567393,0.0007958285,0.0023212468,0.0009372004,0.005357194,0.0011224321,0.0016855315,0.013053733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08936979,0.00054745947,0.0009947981,0.002282826,0.0013743666,0.0041809217,0.0014065432,0.0021960647,0.0015830209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045579816,0.0016228867,0.45750296,0.002231293,0.000789031,0.0008300095,0.0072522936,0.05510834,0.0124396635,0.025054457,0.008522007,0.42408907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000407185,0.0043053455,0.69807,0.0015732859,0.0012559135,0.001093502,0.010719347,0.14857036,0.026431175,0.062289312,0.04475324,0.0005313136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011543803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009379294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016093653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025686047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029647439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08511239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069812862","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00537","title":"Communicating numeric quantities in context: implications for decision science and rationality claims","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Decision theory; Social psychology; Management science; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Data science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.27315012421069956,"score_gpt":0.5010961476828564,"score_spread":0.2279460234721568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069812862","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16528216,0.0076330216,0.5137333,0.09853793,0.0028626616,0.00027993845,0.0014062565,0.00075412093,0.20951062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9235223,0.0016693259,0.06858663,0.002444663,0.00091375003,0.00016680679,0.00026242793,0.00015228368,0.0022817363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99193466,0.0043314616,0.0005659593,0.00154123,0.0013298421,0.00029692592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95634794,0.031055514,0.0044470592,0.0037646457,0.0032381273,0.0011468284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0094130915,0.0011797195,0.0013174415,0.001867071,0.0018109418,0.012874317,0.0022686052,0.0044622454,0.019927789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11492372,0.00096579595,0.001215763,0.0015511527,0.010233618,0.024574606,0.0046259663,0.004424209,0.002648321],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005383434,0.00014672797,0.003912972,0.0006841231,0.00018049587,0.00054070295,0.004678665,0.0059780544,0.004091803,0.9200929,0.0049642026,0.054190945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003322628,0.000032552656,0.0012653033,0.00012773926,0.000025345968,0.00008197563,0.0005557593,0.005428287,0.00059130124,0.98890465,0.0029088883,0.000045000877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016878102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011798049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019927789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001995491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017382337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06666511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070341805","doi":"10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.419","title":"Judgment dissociation theory: An analysis of differences in causal, counterfactual and covariational reasoning.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Categorization; Outcome (game theory); Counterfactual conditional; Psychology; Causal reasoning; Focus (optics); Contrast (vision); Cognitive psychology; Dissociation (chemistry); Social psychology; Econometrics; Cognition; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.12943558866206265,"score_gpt":0.45714020044750975,"score_spread":0.3277046117854471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070341805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47688952,0.0068482384,0.3614304,0.0044613793,0.00057052675,0.0007755088,0.0011158879,0.0003141979,0.14759429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692928,0.00070754695,0.026055707,0.00055943715,0.00013757782,0.00035555885,0.00040927654,0.00007760548,0.002404437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99566036,0.0016095506,0.00023095237,0.0007376618,0.0015461805,0.00021519861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9623413,0.030607693,0.0025571913,0.0020127243,0.0016349466,0.00084605016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008709121,0.0005372177,0.0009236552,0.002587903,0.0007763477,0.0041551706,0.0014529709,0.0009290003,0.009026496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061425555,0.0004083951,0.001280296,0.0019684995,0.0036089728,0.005894194,0.002610881,0.0026982632,0.00059984106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011426236,0.00056783453,0.05101425,0.0004701847,0.00057523855,0.00032656043,0.0044765375,0.006369743,0.0036251307,0.78402257,0.002928862,0.14448036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013873867,0.00026820225,0.056879662,0.00004914477,0.00014808004,0.0006308181,0.00067840447,0.0323867,0.0012837743,0.9010766,0.006389019,0.00007079277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001826988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079415285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009026496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026182549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011234564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046058774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071292773","doi":"10.1155/2010/838240","title":"The Foundations of Probability with Black Swans","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Probability and Statistics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Air Force; Universitetet i Oslo; Division of Mathematical Sciences; University of Toronto","keywords":"Black swan theory; Axiom; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Arrow; Rare events; Econometrics; Statistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.10649993398141018,"score_gpt":0.38531583773937944,"score_spread":0.2788159037579693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071292773","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019095529,0.0012865942,0.94320893,0.005138016,0.00029537478,0.000048296566,0.0003073322,0.00010123448,0.03051876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6946165,0.0023436353,0.29014662,0.0024327608,0.0017612788,0.00044403985,0.00033730036,0.00010617777,0.0078117484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933421,0.0028127164,0.00035137736,0.0012456501,0.0019306443,0.00031757486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96820796,0.022999031,0.0023362488,0.0033448723,0.0023797157,0.00073219603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008850847,0.0008077548,0.0010085554,0.002465866,0.0021199882,0.0040389,0.0017351741,0.0015999532,0.0045187455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030979287,0.00062812364,0.0017805827,0.0022369088,0.011291949,0.009685416,0.0038550466,0.0056299632,0.0006740305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035790379,0.0000048866955,0.00018882178,0.000012933108,0.000006376042,0.000016553344,0.000068866844,0.0012258032,0.00003653363,0.99519956,0.00022064916,0.0030153112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028490679,0.0000052542796,0.00013968884,0.000010675831,0.0000028420961,0.000016525639,0.000010587438,0.0049423473,0.00003445734,0.99322695,0.0016021156,0.0000057983457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024029752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019788484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008850847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023755615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017409405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046808302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072427808","doi":"10.2117/psysoc.2004.277","title":"A POWER STRUGGLE: BETWEEN- VS. WITHIN-SUBJECTS DESIGNS IN DEDUCTIVE REASONING RESEARCH","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PSYCHOLOGIA","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Expectancy theory; Psychology; Power (physics); External validity; Contrast (vision); Social psychology; Research design; Measure (data warehouse); Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Data mining","score_opus":0.3916198528619041,"score_gpt":0.5215943490546544,"score_spread":0.1299744961927503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072427808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5535509,0.0007127931,0.38548192,0.0011560706,0.0028347934,0.040344976,0.00056621624,0.001040106,0.014312225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5289456,0.00028442626,0.3700247,0.0017194126,0.0011189012,0.092584826,0.00043474053,0.0007135632,0.004173778],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.7808753,0.162608,0.01404807,0.020037204,0.020171002,0.0022604652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45364013,0.45343253,0.02099697,0.053511526,0.015571809,0.002847011],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.18912861,0.0019272914,0.0030638725,0.0019604436,0.002194782,0.004633145,0.0029076722,0.004353711,0.0101612955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38333455,0.0027160714,0.002241877,0.0015956447,0.006342109,0.007223782,0.004591483,0.0056528687,0.0019654555],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.13031156,0.075503245,0.04852117,0.005947269,0.0029955672,0.0014127109,0.059880156,0.016020061,0.08725978,0.21133164,0.005807371,0.35500956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07324637,0.21178,0.053947505,0.0009853863,0.0023087806,0.0014149402,0.0032718687,0.07759862,0.079396285,0.42796627,0.066802174,0.0012818909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002667351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037257143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81087136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022006752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017189254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072665327","doi":"10.1177/1046878104270471","title":"In the long run: Biological versus economic rationality","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Simulation & Gaming","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Value (mathematics); Economics; Game of chance; Subjective expected utility; Expected utility hypothesis; Psychology; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Financial economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.3368642494284023,"score_gpt":0.4854850767944849,"score_spread":0.14862082736608256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072665327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98520887,0.00025151085,0.008705732,0.000491834,0.000012382028,0.000024979106,0.00005178482,0.000013503159,0.005239525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99768555,0.00009310844,0.0017131798,0.000042163192,0.0000027117803,0.000020703326,0.00002952791,0.0000027500803,0.00041014666],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912053,0.0005159919,0.000038940176,0.00011054267,0.000109568144,0.00010438328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917419,0.0061266753,0.0008884987,0.00044688195,0.0002960043,0.0005000151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002458324,0.00036811418,0.00036426663,0.00028325478,0.00042787998,0.0016567728,0.0005732231,0.0010973566,0.0025700612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017173102,0.00023164533,0.0004936309,0.0002700707,0.0014973867,0.0025938498,0.0012081595,0.001193833,0.00014507954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002553991,0.0007747678,0.120345816,0.00017196032,0.0006213281,0.00051339314,0.0012834327,0.7368958,0.0035180096,0.102969274,0.0010537239,0.02929848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028508058,0.0011235124,0.038932707,0.00009271697,0.0002528039,0.00024298529,0.0014524683,0.67380065,0.0019985794,0.2786642,0.0030135403,0.00014073696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024488356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041095275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025700612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010610102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007154052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013000965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073102303","doi":"10.1257/mic.3.4.35","title":"Mnemonomics: The Sunk Cost Fallacy as a Memory Kludge","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Sunk costs; Fallacy; Economics; Simple (philosophy); Mental accounting; Econometrics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.14573624000007926,"score_gpt":0.38155029018719855,"score_spread":0.2358140501871193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073102303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66285723,0.004626961,0.14225039,0.02775476,0.00057484204,0.00017738689,0.0006777734,0.0004425747,0.16063805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860123,0.00037669236,0.005827053,0.0009390248,0.0001479598,0.000037798804,0.000054125034,0.000040797,0.0065642996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922323,0.00022086727,0.000047070942,0.00020732223,0.0002287048,0.00007283846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99100167,0.0053025647,0.0014614484,0.0012311232,0.00058192865,0.00042123406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016746919,0.0003660289,0.0005664879,0.0007805266,0.0006781662,0.003032103,0.000827229,0.0015636672,0.017233891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021288827,0.00028098357,0.00041042437,0.0005964007,0.0025180373,0.0044633937,0.0012371553,0.002296998,0.0008414324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062317424,0.00029221785,0.018667312,0.00025487595,0.00011767986,0.00064665877,0.00091243786,0.009237509,0.005157526,0.84373885,0.008246221,0.112105496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069098656,0.00012962092,0.012579074,0.0000439434,0.00004075674,0.00035812068,0.00014011287,0.018275158,0.00072203483,0.9635174,0.0040969946,0.000027624772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012464592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080465805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017233891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012026334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058193994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05765307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073606051","doi":"10.1037/a0015582","title":"L'impact de l'information saillante et du niveau de gravité du crime sur la décision du jury.","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Humanities; Jury; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.09492800671451536,"score_gpt":0.3308381341712982,"score_spread":0.23591012745678286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073606051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732346,0.0009192788,0.001875488,0.00065263454,0.00012702015,0.00010570386,0.00015362375,0.000039562736,0.022892024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936452,0.00042194748,0.0016157879,0.00024139047,0.000039580667,0.00008599231,0.000099672376,0.000020662692,0.0038299244],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956233,0.0023077116,0.00017790827,0.00034013097,0.0013087337,0.00024214612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772704,0.016979245,0.002441948,0.00042637603,0.0018490981,0.0010328762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030644727,0.00047854715,0.00032273697,0.00061859575,0.00084060093,0.0018830809,0.00036191804,0.0008850971,0.010401539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02241594,0.00021363482,0.00045095367,0.00030569526,0.0006982836,0.00073681324,0.0011703561,0.0010170542,0.00093922636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008654981,0.0026607106,0.4699048,0.0030997081,0.0011498864,0.0020995468,0.03764184,0.0049079666,0.07463217,0.0076766713,0.0076975455,0.37987417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009626819,0.0023690714,0.9622011,0.0003798774,0.0003460006,0.0004602112,0.010849038,0.001730206,0.0068671494,0.0023234289,0.012226341,0.00015130329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002509745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046897638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010401539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008400452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081342086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034796655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074644642","doi":"10.1037/h0085797","title":"Informal reasoning: Theory and method.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.10117616676398551,"score_gpt":0.42505001661709146,"score_spread":0.32387384985310597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074644642","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026902913,0.035817903,0.73652196,0.029120073,0.0033411237,0.0017162977,0.00090834836,0.0011352568,0.1887487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13652866,0.033597335,0.7662715,0.009498547,0.004238443,0.011519804,0.0016076234,0.0011988947,0.035539303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837891,0.011721418,0.00093476736,0.0013431709,0.0018307111,0.0003808809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9513115,0.038871154,0.0014578889,0.0046669594,0.0024777125,0.0012147232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023811197,0.0015904754,0.0015143603,0.00686072,0.0025372826,0.009419608,0.003998981,0.003824918,0.024814805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03403424,0.0014873283,0.0020097566,0.005791177,0.02060411,0.015677748,0.0072508473,0.006675024,0.008927038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019038529,0.000056440404,0.00035623668,0.00057721656,0.000015888334,0.00005525861,0.001495191,0.00028393784,0.00004633014,0.94194067,0.018397525,0.036756303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023616463,0.000021869046,0.0003465529,0.0011483744,0.000020108242,0.00017965217,0.0010609323,0.0017406981,0.00009465288,0.852035,0.14330935,0.000019193367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014630836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011396826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024814805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046305885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061962013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12592715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077003671","doi":"10.1186/1744-9081-3-45","title":"Decision making: rational or hedonic?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Functions","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pleasure; Psychology; Dimension (graph theory); Social psychology; Hedonism; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.17640941697110402,"score_gpt":0.4404082378967026,"score_spread":0.26399882092559857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077003671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941373,0.000087833585,0.0025035937,0.00017365975,0.000025064293,0.000116405216,0.00003601872,0.000010648393,0.0029095644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964186,0.00007833481,0.0027884005,0.00010512379,0.000016730617,0.00015504289,0.00003694763,0.000004463095,0.000396397],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820685,0.00089308503,0.00013653292,0.0003214044,0.00027519267,0.00016698093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800843,0.014757928,0.0026777827,0.0013677734,0.00034072832,0.00077160785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049682925,0.00052012445,0.00049676653,0.00026675317,0.0003494959,0.0018368976,0.00037552952,0.0008081044,0.0036020004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019719975,0.00028768147,0.00027114092,0.0002683641,0.0015327964,0.0017820675,0.0007231654,0.000932087,0.00017403929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05913021,0.044337966,0.22003515,0.0034316955,0.0015510533,0.0010725853,0.020452758,0.014356309,0.15532465,0.114858046,0.0037304435,0.36171916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00981736,0.06390603,0.4312179,0.00048902474,0.0008812365,0.00088293065,0.009030983,0.08648806,0.067197494,0.3172351,0.012173958,0.00067992194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030750904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003104841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049682925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047281565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030990652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026275098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078174609","doi":"10.1353/ils.2011.0030","title":"Addressing Uncertainty: When Information is Not Enough / Faire face à l'incertitude : quand l'information ne suffit pas","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.1631555707352942,"score_gpt":0.31135461134263126,"score_spread":0.14819904060733707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078174609","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13431346,0.025419801,0.13106763,0.46830976,0.0030887164,0.00029187408,0.000496796,0.0001662135,0.2368457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96972007,0.0046879333,0.010633017,0.010529162,0.00086853,0.00010943542,0.00007458195,0.000047139645,0.0033300808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776358,0.012943153,0.00086065126,0.0016864946,0.0052291877,0.0016446939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9262164,0.05340027,0.007806667,0.0032002127,0.0069475896,0.0024288793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023982769,0.00057601,0.001129246,0.0019612126,0.0055332934,0.014763273,0.0018496617,0.008645972,0.005836471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10669509,0.00050003454,0.0007191806,0.0019485145,0.02257826,0.027284773,0.006292442,0.0065401327,0.0006652387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040679914,0.00015965616,0.009378052,0.0011257961,0.00025768907,0.0010039194,0.02529832,0.0032294614,0.0012306572,0.83909506,0.017907673,0.10090697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020847223,0.00007946149,0.0020582958,0.00063265074,0.000066256696,0.00035051262,0.011627531,0.0020657273,0.0006124702,0.9522477,0.030148493,0.00009004339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057379347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035780289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023982769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005530156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006635934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12683451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078191819","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00398","title":"Uncertain deduction and conditional reasoning","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Deductive reasoning; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.17498182865155368,"score_gpt":0.45419041215364175,"score_spread":0.2792085835020881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078191819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5222001,0.0055861278,0.40843016,0.011775989,0.00027099712,0.00013322718,0.00025038913,0.00027235784,0.051080614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96235746,0.000576161,0.035438,0.0004240903,0.00015488711,0.000038603124,0.00012089351,0.000029273197,0.00086068624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893896,0.0061702146,0.00048226462,0.0012012074,0.002330951,0.0004258252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93733895,0.051973738,0.0045556817,0.002692701,0.0023356273,0.0011033185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011702519,0.00043462927,0.00048511097,0.0011947005,0.0007049399,0.0025465374,0.0009753318,0.0012191933,0.0040788567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05801294,0.00035024184,0.0007848622,0.00090542575,0.008100938,0.005614837,0.0023807734,0.0020223074,0.00041603338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004307125,0.00010208653,0.0088427095,0.00032485076,0.000105121995,0.00024214275,0.00323231,0.0077460078,0.0016789862,0.91085774,0.0014655101,0.064971894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030297282,0.00003605534,0.0039331196,0.000041913245,0.00001884431,0.000090192385,0.00016709478,0.012400768,0.0005925375,0.9804467,0.002219869,0.00002262549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011636751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006555685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011702519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010404588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009427372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06188959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078362694","doi":"10.1126/science.1246799","title":"Response to Comment on “Poverty Impedes Cognitive Function”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Poverty; Task (project management); Ceiling (cloud); Continuous variable; Control (management); Psychology; Function (biology); Ceiling effect; Cognitive psychology; Econometrics; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Economics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Biology; Artificial intelligence; Geography; Medicine; Genetics; Economic growth; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.14222507718703079,"score_gpt":0.4072034179859872,"score_spread":0.26497834079895644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078362694","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040518361,0.0004538581,0.00013395282,0.97473234,0.02198767,0.000026850625,0.00015119453,0.0001228317,0.001986113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026963581,0.0002763482,0.00015385904,0.97376823,0.018250367,0.00005809967,0.00004188084,0.000034697732,0.004720145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981621,0.00039137126,0.00027127343,0.0003277582,0.00056552637,0.00028198533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948778,0.002583752,0.00034585976,0.00024150973,0.0013454001,0.00060571876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029830416,0.00088515313,0.0014798027,0.00060590997,0.0030221862,0.0020721091,0.002899712,0.04740414,0.012405101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01689545,0.0006753622,0.0012823298,0.0006366325,0.0027306227,0.0020672479,0.0014644482,0.03895689,0.015988443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049418875,0.000025597401,0.00031682465,0.000022002185,0.000009097844,0.000585817,0.000044454788,0.000024165134,0.00008783333,0.0007095355,0.9946398,0.0034855383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020884152,0.00015656745,0.003937393,0.00024124135,0.00005433009,0.0017078725,0.00046307585,0.0007199596,0.00073930604,0.007573982,0.9840866,0.00011092409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009087677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008940401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04740414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042134887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028877351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041499197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078615059","doi":"10.1509/jmkr.45.6.665","title":"The Effect of Partitions on Controlling Consumption","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Context (archaeology); Control (management); Decision process; Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Habituation; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Economics; Psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.35901842010287494,"score_gpt":0.5238326286858027,"score_spread":0.16481420858292778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078615059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909079,0.00029424604,0.002375439,0.00016250134,0.000037302765,0.00006885892,0.000060858085,0.00005165619,0.0060411273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99616325,0.00014799096,0.0020901691,0.00009833412,0.000024099238,0.0000633787,0.00009572681,0.000027059352,0.0012900378],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977958,0.0010859064,0.00016046628,0.00041450054,0.0003548609,0.00018851159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9597875,0.028108703,0.0048857764,0.005085098,0.0010330142,0.0010998334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023330294,0.00085855165,0.00050783786,0.0005149824,0.00062830385,0.001984996,0.00084287924,0.0008453711,0.0042322665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02966627,0.00038265486,0.00071813277,0.00052958145,0.001513341,0.0015670932,0.0018544623,0.00088610884,0.00038437158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.031849127,0.008993871,0.4373191,0.0011090296,0.0023018518,0.000812986,0.014137215,0.028453426,0.073982574,0.017973809,0.002798759,0.3802682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011478703,0.009002068,0.8962165,0.00020506654,0.0016372408,0.0003443437,0.0031804293,0.021141658,0.030560596,0.022828428,0.013483524,0.00025218254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046450547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034047477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046450547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010989818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000610231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0141583085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078890878","doi":"10.3758/bf03196060","title":"A comparative approach to cue competition with one and two strong predictors","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learning & Behavior","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Competition (biology); Conditioning; Probabilistic logic; Classical conditioning; Competitor analysis; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Ecology","score_opus":0.14063985846460078,"score_gpt":0.393702878170241,"score_spread":0.25306301970564027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078890878","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.107573204,0.0051752264,0.7800169,0.00534165,0.0004701383,0.00020782521,0.000471039,0.00020908358,0.10053495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84409195,0.001777961,0.14238659,0.0009927482,0.0004819435,0.00049495144,0.00018807068,0.000095203475,0.009490524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680126,0.002122078,0.00009398703,0.0003398631,0.00045759845,0.00018523839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857211,0.011534685,0.0005430003,0.0009946793,0.00075730117,0.0004492307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010074286,0.0012640349,0.001545994,0.0022331115,0.0012449458,0.002162817,0.0033873082,0.0019700534,0.018927673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019176515,0.0004647601,0.0010895894,0.0018978819,0.003812498,0.0048063323,0.0027014986,0.001764578,0.00051590626],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004442785,0.00018353188,0.0016598364,0.00024393733,0.00016497585,0.00014476756,0.00016794613,0.011600402,0.001965851,0.95229816,0.0016388263,0.029487526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012851339,0.0005846779,0.002254671,0.00009409301,0.00022265708,0.00026593063,0.00029486525,0.0816458,0.0011920516,0.90602535,0.007239193,0.000052223317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016797179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016085092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018927673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020743515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014952795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063319325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081301917","doi":"10.2501/s1470785309201314","title":"How far can you rely on a concept test: the generalizability of testing over occasions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Market Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Test (biology); Business; Marketing; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.559281526593081,"score_gpt":0.5036483420894333,"score_spread":0.055633184503647626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081301917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77320147,0.0057471036,0.17505312,0.008301725,0.0023644,0.0021011678,0.0005151616,0.00090798107,0.031807896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96825445,0.0007177673,0.026657287,0.0017317208,0.0003807321,0.0010658759,0.00021030837,0.00023423052,0.0007476141],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.72303087,0.16908401,0.014994489,0.032845363,0.05734012,0.0027051796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.20247133,0.6096764,0.03845136,0.11360476,0.033047657,0.0027484787],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.27479723,0.0011275578,0.0023489413,0.0037713964,0.0023180742,0.0062009133,0.003420766,0.0049216556,0.0021030246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.67255557,0.001265757,0.0047053522,0.003015219,0.016223088,0.01906021,0.0068396204,0.004726982,0.0010967301],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030335996,0.0007619366,0.43200278,0.0020551905,0.006047659,0.00056169037,0.06374373,0.0059971004,0.0046062055,0.018581035,0.0068357647,0.45577335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006074523,0.00833403,0.7466895,0.003424731,0.002200953,0.0015149227,0.031828634,0.023238331,0.00964901,0.1337802,0.037626777,0.0011054082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00533492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033488395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27479723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022763524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021679406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89430416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082154704","doi":"10.3758/bf03196067","title":"A signal detection analysis of contingency data","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learning & Behavior","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Contingency; Psychology; Task (project management); Detection theory; SIGNAL (programming language); Interpretation (philosophy); Contingency table; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Machine learning; Epistemology","score_opus":0.20233569729112458,"score_gpt":0.4405534837010651,"score_spread":0.23821778640994054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082154704","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33393916,0.0003300022,0.6621746,0.00035765723,0.000062900384,0.00013295659,0.00041885412,0.0009687305,0.001615086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8544475,0.00014791261,0.14378312,0.00005113985,0.00007527653,0.000058869246,0.00054137653,0.000061543535,0.0008333175],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882096,0.00036690445,0.00006707332,0.00025250134,0.00035462607,0.00013799574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99046445,0.006849553,0.0005487377,0.00096703216,0.00092177535,0.0002484583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002776689,0.00042045658,0.00081503193,0.0027217,0.0006176532,0.0010191498,0.0007418292,0.00063759065,0.0026266612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014017683,0.00032427782,0.00074677623,0.0016911454,0.0004351829,0.0012343104,0.0006707602,0.0009921523,0.0004526631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025526616,0.0007661502,0.04707817,0.00036881346,0.00042806455,0.0011258194,0.00040193813,0.084027626,0.07737008,0.047234066,0.004877077,0.7337696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003217369,0.00024152073,0.012992046,0.00001910042,0.000058480797,0.0005777338,0.000056153556,0.96143824,0.009599809,0.013807894,0.00113638,0.0000405342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014616366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013196492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002776689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003855235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076063874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014684677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082828419","doi":"10.1108/10610420910957843","title":"Consumer perceptions of bundles","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Product & Brand Management","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Bundle; Perception; Test (biology); Marketing; Business; Economics; Advertising; Microeconomics; Psychology","score_opus":0.07452767040881984,"score_gpt":0.39014927446866143,"score_spread":0.3156216040598416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082828419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94610596,0.0047786376,0.0045469482,0.001855566,0.00017118076,0.00011325974,0.0004420434,0.00005527287,0.041931115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942637,0.0016079927,0.0018362022,0.00057615794,0.000055060143,0.000046761346,0.00027970836,0.000017975572,0.001316369],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969212,0.0014345049,0.00020278929,0.00024871228,0.001101644,0.00009117237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98598456,0.0079303635,0.0029490946,0.0011251767,0.0015851449,0.00042568106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005648474,0.00043687923,0.0004716577,0.0009522394,0.0005824274,0.0031539896,0.00042086942,0.00093913503,0.008436005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019858738,0.00031102388,0.00090022234,0.0007382885,0.0012922758,0.0039531235,0.0012139879,0.0014063477,0.00042308605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031231965,0.0010589832,0.55847496,0.005693269,0.002227427,0.0009554788,0.08876888,0.0017515367,0.0055043953,0.034235388,0.012813797,0.28539276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004374502,0.0037631602,0.7084306,0.00303047,0.0019804623,0.0016353539,0.11010788,0.0052885558,0.0032294767,0.04792988,0.11371222,0.00045451068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016815508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012366647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008436005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094879256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033473142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029872358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084665677","doi":"10.1098/rsbl.2014.0451","title":"Reward context determines risky choice in pigeons and humans","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biology Letters","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Gambling Research Institute, University of Calgary; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Consilience; Biology; Context (archaeology); Key (lock); Cognitive psychology; Ecology; Psychology","score_opus":0.09896210205384492,"score_gpt":0.38890716183964497,"score_spread":0.28994505978580004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084665677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993765,0.000043643613,0.00016884792,0.000053819014,0.000003951079,0.000002575738,0.000013961261,0.0000041176004,0.0003327993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930036,0.000047103407,0.00033648984,0.000065032706,0.0000020606517,0.0000050179365,0.000022545953,0.0000056469153,0.00021571857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998147,0.00006870143,0.0000067517767,0.000054286284,0.000023341518,0.000032175187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995461,0.00013474895,0.00009628155,0.00005503963,0.000022268772,0.00014550825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039838278,0.00020839354,0.00022697778,0.00028580034,0.00020248938,0.0005090112,0.00016344179,0.0003522139,0.0014965414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012925459,0.00019893354,0.00013247404,0.000083217434,0.0009642977,0.00031363498,0.00043854592,0.00044302034,0.00014369341],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004670596,0.0014835844,0.49040654,0.0001349994,0.00016089504,0.0013779639,0.002874805,0.0020106481,0.45137218,0.0034467506,0.0012125972,0.04084839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006998079,0.0010963368,0.98312736,0.000028765402,0.000036022342,0.00069590437,0.00088080316,0.002954105,0.007457276,0.0023915707,0.0012018933,0.00005997872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028565612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052657654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028565612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026444628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017396164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005679846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084895529","doi":"10.1016/s1532-0464(02)00009-6","title":"Emerging paradigms of cognition in medical decision-making","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":340,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"U.S. National Library of Medicine","keywords":"R-CAST; Decision engineering; Business decision mapping; Decision support system; Management science; Decision analysis; Computer science; Evidential reasoning approach; Medical decision making; Scope (computer science); Knowledge management; Medical research; Clinical decision support system; Data science; Artificial intelligence; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.15835805001409523,"score_gpt":0.47525694909480876,"score_spread":0.31689889908071356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084895529","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009377775,0.97647035,0.008678617,0.007980814,0.00061263924,0.000010117141,0.000016389322,0.000012634649,0.0052806386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022153933,0.9674296,0.0057866164,0.0023466456,0.0015436481,0.0000430548,0.00002010828,0.0000052214864,0.0006712793],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868196,0.00068621675,0.000092948096,0.00015068274,0.00033261656,0.000055543624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869668,0.011229882,0.00031494594,0.00020250157,0.001110203,0.00017566413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004947232,0.0010629765,0.0018329533,0.0030315812,0.0006060047,0.0034284405,0.0018652199,0.0029033208,0.0023500926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009047505,0.0003099928,0.00061892986,0.0049373033,0.004838443,0.00521918,0.0010814416,0.0037989228,0.00046928503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010157948,0.00014405558,0.0009953784,0.008959593,0.0001970197,0.00031658832,0.00066784595,0.0020937237,0.00035734926,0.26360047,0.011742559,0.71082383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045127737,0.00008161063,0.0026659286,0.0068414244,0.00021378654,0.0010155838,0.0009298459,0.0018466411,0.000420826,0.7167458,0.26912713,0.00006629237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032945778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004573584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004947232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026635688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038221024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026163757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085536117","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0033460","title":"Sensitivity and Bias in Decision-Making under Risk: Evaluating the Perception of Reward, Its Probability and Value","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Prospect theory; Subjective expected utility; Psychology; Discriminative model; Frequentist probability; Econometrics; Perception; Sensitivity (control systems); Expected utility hypothesis; Statistics; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Bayesian probability; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.38761188622295256,"score_gpt":0.42519829052051145,"score_spread":0.037586404297558884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085536117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99157286,0.00015272146,0.006254716,0.00007639391,0.000008639364,0.000072754796,0.00006459465,0.000022575212,0.0017747444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968266,0.00006775158,0.002807822,0.000046493893,0.000005791467,0.000036966212,0.00004783108,0.0000059448084,0.00015469303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727887,0.0014068853,0.00020848341,0.00035915745,0.00062881416,0.00011784201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755058,0.017230798,0.0042511877,0.0013284606,0.00064221903,0.001041399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006179766,0.0005902987,0.0005395215,0.0008003295,0.0002078825,0.0012643514,0.0002994907,0.0007709346,0.0035781562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027717263,0.00026137714,0.00047976983,0.00038450313,0.0014167521,0.000960696,0.00079295534,0.0009088455,0.0003454058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013213922,0.002674319,0.75070983,0.0006791113,0.0012342479,0.00045387243,0.002811727,0.016243972,0.072598435,0.006484713,0.00080896146,0.13208683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030854024,0.0066653052,0.89293694,0.00012625664,0.00024425937,0.0010063407,0.0007764938,0.038266025,0.026445348,0.03187283,0.0011640888,0.00018750461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041480162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033731342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006179766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003758366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038456163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03268212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085887099","doi":"10.1037/a0028857","title":"Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":356,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive bias; Blind spot; Sophistication; Cognition; Response bias; Heuristics; Confirmation bias; Cognitive psychology; Social cognition; Social psychology","score_opus":0.44430542555546176,"score_gpt":0.5126332451784136,"score_spread":0.06832781962295181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085887099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97842294,0.00039512498,0.00509243,0.0005648502,0.00006953271,0.00006363549,0.00017029351,0.00016935435,0.015051889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957437,0.00007229343,0.0018977193,0.00027602175,0.00003216475,0.00004368265,0.00010900419,0.00006286997,0.0017625359],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798226,0.0005171144,0.00012773446,0.0004813045,0.00070723804,0.0001842568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.936491,0.030088726,0.013439583,0.014897429,0.0017851496,0.003298091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036017578,0.0005379284,0.0005972861,0.0005895596,0.00034197315,0.0012404806,0.0006637413,0.00086817495,0.009221778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04170401,0.0003942844,0.0005651176,0.00030274875,0.0013786015,0.0018501177,0.0020937237,0.0014982761,0.0007409327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018868396,0.005185964,0.4798661,0.0018371643,0.002435857,0.0016582919,0.0071322178,0.0026605518,0.22538036,0.025554966,0.006656548,0.22276364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003372597,0.0030285711,0.9394908,0.00012456535,0.0005209797,0.0011030382,0.00047448545,0.003940537,0.01963682,0.024652096,0.006586649,0.000104258754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070438714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005623759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009221778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034164777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062577985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030849993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086279032","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.08.005","title":"The role of computational ease on the decision to spend loyalty program points","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty program; Loyalty; Point (geometry); Cash; Marketing; Function (biology); Point of sale; Currency; Advertising; Computer science; Microeconomics; Business; Loyalty business model; Economics; Finance; Mathematics; Monetary economics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.10265426817800227,"score_gpt":0.473280398755049,"score_spread":0.37062613057704674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086279032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945609,0.000040857736,0.00046474277,0.00015724091,0.0000043391433,0.000011462383,0.000026260659,0.000006539532,0.0047276155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992811,0.000024908511,0.00031729715,0.000030022571,0.000004580605,0.0000050506983,0.000021761567,0.0000070499377,0.0003083055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986981,0.00076871825,0.000083559156,0.00013113648,0.00015330456,0.00016503852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95518047,0.03540915,0.00447649,0.0017178012,0.001047301,0.002168672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019918573,0.00023744752,0.00025273673,0.00036873392,0.00041418598,0.0024052707,0.0003238561,0.0006424852,0.010468172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03104594,0.00020942811,0.00026766266,0.00027897305,0.00085516577,0.0013144466,0.0011159095,0.0011800841,0.0004199128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008812377,0.0041507026,0.815805,0.00044711417,0.00049740076,0.0013820378,0.004805154,0.016089993,0.028905941,0.018696154,0.0019380539,0.09847001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028866957,0.0010283834,0.94226253,0.00010473211,0.00029098635,0.000500027,0.0029727619,0.031994708,0.0038772416,0.013770278,0.002758875,0.00015085223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018006183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024490382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010468172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004909442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035006978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035019577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086594387","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.002","title":"Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":431,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Dual process theory (moral psychology); Heuristic; Cognitive psychology; Think aloud protocol; Epistemology; Thinking processes; Confirmation bias; Inference; Heuristics; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Moral reasoning; Computer science","score_opus":0.1551283694678041,"score_gpt":0.44587910394094915,"score_spread":0.29075073447314503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086594387","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4222682,0.0026435857,0.5298749,0.006182612,0.00039466334,0.00009942613,0.00011054203,0.00013212988,0.03829391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685629,0.00032631215,0.02953071,0.00015808553,0.00016164873,0.00007499412,0.000036173562,0.000018813333,0.0011303944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612695,0.0019625472,0.00020280076,0.0005504774,0.00087871205,0.00027847211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658748,0.02720586,0.0024748659,0.0020705312,0.001459955,0.0009139813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008600487,0.0006824938,0.0010906331,0.0015790007,0.00079900434,0.005882672,0.0015991286,0.0023287383,0.004165216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03703032,0.00074269896,0.0010785013,0.0014639908,0.003090262,0.009962873,0.002089651,0.0029677872,0.00028620064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039378335,0.00022409191,0.0049034413,0.00012795885,0.00012227445,0.00013486129,0.0009891823,0.015614746,0.0008932759,0.9499181,0.00050069066,0.026177604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039563034,0.00002074544,0.0008102474,0.000010649779,0.000027328955,0.00003751326,0.00005999783,0.03734921,0.00016595266,0.96119905,0.00026736304,0.000012446473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008043637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048140922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008600487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014907198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009815492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045484245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086656617","doi":"10.3758/s13423-011-0141-6","title":"Evidence affects hypothesis judgments more if accumulated gradually than if presented instantaneously","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Research (Canada); BC Mental Health & Substance Use Services; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Michael Smith Health Research BC","keywords":"Psychology; Task (project management); Empirical evidence; Statistical evidence; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Null hypothesis; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.3740210754793285,"score_gpt":0.414861016562455,"score_spread":0.040839941083126496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086656617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8570842,0.05044153,0.038077198,0.01320523,0.003986442,0.00030069027,0.0009734758,0.00045092317,0.03548032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955836,0.019776115,0.018515883,0.0021091313,0.0011504983,0.000062278676,0.00047763766,0.00010128832,0.0019711284],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996617,0.00089537236,0.00043275955,0.0005891858,0.0013356502,0.00013000342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9084302,0.07145852,0.008299107,0.0031491448,0.0067877993,0.0018752154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00620962,0.0006284281,0.00097141234,0.0019761398,0.00043225902,0.0029563913,0.00063790946,0.002058011,0.006457763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07192188,0.00054144236,0.00092930754,0.0009438544,0.0012512393,0.0039190617,0.0010737374,0.0026487706,0.00092980696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0084165875,0.0014642654,0.16524662,0.0076859845,0.0032680887,0.002589172,0.00069933676,0.0021260504,0.13747138,0.016002337,0.007950917,0.6470792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014114255,0.009660154,0.5745936,0.004745134,0.009761188,0.007028773,0.0015818254,0.010333563,0.14620921,0.16356036,0.07055169,0.0005631524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043370877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007214215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006457763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007297112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001000258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032840014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086662877","doi":"10.1007/s11126-009-9094-6","title":"Does Intuition have a Role in Psychiatric Diagnosis?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Psychiatric Quarterly","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Intuition; Psychiatry; Psychology; Medicine; Cognitive science; Nursing","score_opus":0.0742701567862718,"score_gpt":0.41360220549102233,"score_spread":0.33933204870475053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086662877","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011484447,0.99533045,0.0002403228,0.003029351,0.00023589739,0.000002294003,0.0000071721684,0.0000016499795,0.0010380817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0041748513,0.9928732,0.00041434384,0.0016822884,0.0005664632,0.0000074289633,0.000010455906,0.0000017120884,0.00026916293],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906904,0.0004810488,0.00009934176,0.00009045792,0.00021425555,0.00004589582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894711,0.009019156,0.0004276918,0.00012763935,0.0008292667,0.00012522477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039347457,0.00074869586,0.0024592679,0.0022909008,0.00029816333,0.00175729,0.0010834365,0.0026948866,0.0037096345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012603367,0.0003971847,0.0006586846,0.0027579595,0.00247182,0.002360488,0.0007545875,0.00293237,0.00068651745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001299929,0.00008372755,0.000776162,0.01402499,0.0002975888,0.0001621959,0.000089341804,0.000700841,0.00008410793,0.039010655,0.03736155,0.9072789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032920108,0.00022843793,0.007712535,0.045117393,0.0008207943,0.0020334742,0.00048496743,0.001250896,0.00030117482,0.22751282,0.7140853,0.00012304983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042044134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076570185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042044134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018271584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004018142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020809174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087967090","doi":"10.1080/13546780902930917","title":"Inhibiting beliefs demands attention","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Analytic reasoning; Variety (cybernetics); Motivated reasoning; Task (project management); Social psychology; Content (measure theory); Deductive reasoning; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06805243705929927,"score_gpt":0.3762724253259446,"score_spread":0.3082199882666454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087967090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8961156,0.0007447569,0.02241883,0.002953534,0.00019902854,0.00013401042,0.00014384816,0.00027131455,0.07701912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848763,0.00045980798,0.009039059,0.0011953488,0.0001212359,0.00010234891,0.00018751006,0.00009942954,0.003918912],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739933,0.00059237995,0.00016609413,0.0005489875,0.00097407005,0.0003191948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838304,0.009900299,0.00202868,0.0025263813,0.00088505045,0.0008293013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016749167,0.00069126085,0.00046356107,0.0005036984,0.00039927647,0.0023500167,0.0008624072,0.0014976036,0.0072649503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021649485,0.0005202772,0.00046509426,0.0004164534,0.0010816761,0.0022881462,0.0020055396,0.0018244522,0.0009730565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025767968,0.0020714425,0.07287817,0.0016766121,0.00051565334,0.0013444253,0.0051629576,0.005067101,0.5079202,0.08527712,0.006474225,0.3090354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001279504,0.0023111226,0.42058203,0.0004931474,0.0009597886,0.0021190585,0.0020177704,0.034460034,0.12894155,0.36079678,0.04577675,0.00026247368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018011206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015146941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072649503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010826451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008033396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024303675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090185959","doi":"10.1007/s00199-007-0259-y","title":"Utility of gambling II: risk, paradoxes, and data","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Entropy (arrow of time); Mathematics; Representation (politics); Term (time); Computer science; Econometrics","score_opus":0.26794935313812746,"score_gpt":0.45613052440708524,"score_spread":0.18818117126895778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090185959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7135438,0.00492536,0.2404174,0.008531371,0.00025228606,0.00024132988,0.002371158,0.00022321143,0.02949413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905252,0.00052886776,0.0069962735,0.00015283693,0.00006365816,0.0000638777,0.00030642177,0.000022131297,0.0013408188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639314,0.002373469,0.00018627998,0.00038634846,0.00044344162,0.00021735884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92323565,0.06700581,0.0027144784,0.0043152166,0.0016737233,0.0010550224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011117776,0.0007623056,0.0015437271,0.0019592815,0.00051336776,0.00395583,0.001459419,0.0015938014,0.0056518205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08838091,0.00048662102,0.0008297596,0.0017285896,0.003037646,0.007224541,0.001752833,0.0029850106,0.00030982468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022246824,0.0004272769,0.039441094,0.0006076714,0.00034009345,0.00042283477,0.00062611606,0.10832917,0.00070428953,0.767964,0.006664377,0.07224839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005493876,0.00009724565,0.0030648431,0.000079360725,0.000052447234,0.0001670025,0.00016258858,0.17897727,0.00027184174,0.81622875,0.00080349715,0.000040346982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019496611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013850413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011117776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014828376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008358804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05879712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090200932","doi":"10.3758/bf03195272","title":"Generating alternatives: A key component in human reasoning?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Syllogism; Psychology; Key (lock); Measure (data warehouse); Mental model; Component (thermodynamics); Cognitive psychology; Style (visual arts); Deductive reasoning; Cognition; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.1750069597705744,"score_gpt":0.39005024033152236,"score_spread":0.21504328056094796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090200932","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2559919,0.009954955,0.6438373,0.02481991,0.0009307426,0.00022315071,0.00074340275,0.00044462868,0.06305403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8518891,0.004828814,0.13786349,0.00088451285,0.00035754492,0.00013571717,0.00046254616,0.00012457861,0.0034536512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974395,0.0011488397,0.00017497076,0.00044277418,0.00065504527,0.00013880148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98462784,0.010789507,0.0015102909,0.0014809591,0.0009086872,0.00068265834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004968467,0.00076719077,0.0008569256,0.0011655238,0.0007507349,0.0071003037,0.0024132598,0.0031939705,0.0118406005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047256023,0.00066834775,0.0009988268,0.0017095959,0.0038798612,0.021393731,0.001637256,0.002416727,0.0016636455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036171463,0.00028951318,0.0070009194,0.0008201715,0.00024707668,0.00024741667,0.0017630514,0.012950578,0.003682434,0.717877,0.007283332,0.24747682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021047224,0.000023905508,0.0012967134,0.00005771272,0.000036913745,0.000074303316,0.00023244567,0.013405103,0.0008312475,0.9800709,0.0039267372,0.000022962973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001210939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010035732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0118406005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007200972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014788884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039610803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090789917","doi":"10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672","title":"On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":842,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Psychology; Debiasing; Cognitive bias; Heuristics; Neglect; Confirmation bias; Framing effect; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Social psychology; Axiom independence; Anchoring; Axiom; Persuasion","score_opus":0.32368536056585634,"score_gpt":0.4712949365361573,"score_spread":0.14760957597030094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090789917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8968538,0.0040894826,0.024981461,0.0023494295,0.0003769753,0.00021609895,0.001281059,0.00010537025,0.069746345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933143,0.00073237467,0.0031758132,0.0008306137,0.00015751782,0.00011072114,0.00047012392,0.00003526432,0.001173397],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923684,0.0026027139,0.00076530594,0.0019017361,0.0020466943,0.0003152326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6485321,0.30160826,0.016300555,0.021239262,0.009404992,0.0029148266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019690547,0.00078772905,0.0008178857,0.0033140902,0.0006688846,0.002818013,0.00087029237,0.0010440134,0.0077748694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12835759,0.00046308074,0.0013662525,0.0022047742,0.0043152636,0.002826176,0.0038839264,0.0021103364,0.0010087217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027769585,0.0004353918,0.87032884,0.0003770346,0.0025804688,0.0004561366,0.0031386204,0.0018493991,0.0028207498,0.041761678,0.0021805018,0.07129421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017814666,0.0007383249,0.93655217,0.00024623543,0.0011870788,0.0008183509,0.0011341561,0.0052534505,0.0025831265,0.04652006,0.0046087736,0.00018004439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015929078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011216593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019690547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005527839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065725454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1041348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091145675","doi":"10.1037/cep0000020","title":"Strategy selection in cue-based decision making.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Heuristics; Cognitive psychology; Salience (neuroscience); Cognition; Task (project management); Associative property; Heuristic; Set (abstract data type); Process tracing; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.11201421002809482,"score_gpt":0.415463361557653,"score_spread":0.3034491515295582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091145675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73002714,0.007859057,0.21366079,0.0018309496,0.00018436696,0.0003834193,0.00019558962,0.000209802,0.04564877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639223,0.0008627561,0.033823162,0.00020299845,0.00002799091,0.00009721625,0.00007086886,0.000018464974,0.00097423093],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954951,0.002725668,0.00019788151,0.0003919542,0.00094757485,0.0002419123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99057823,0.006800259,0.0011874774,0.00048826312,0.000539599,0.00040614317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005812242,0.00065371837,0.0005232672,0.00093201414,0.0003991115,0.0021210366,0.00058418035,0.0008216133,0.003450638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024059843,0.00023787557,0.00042904465,0.0009071364,0.0013991386,0.0017490309,0.0008110722,0.00068599754,0.00058767514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029698114,0.0009772757,0.05753091,0.002054082,0.00069996004,0.0007180107,0.003384384,0.023424769,0.033682678,0.25346375,0.0033383102,0.617756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004128069,0.0013324606,0.07625262,0.0003981524,0.00028570803,0.0014350563,0.0013969007,0.11643152,0.018071404,0.767635,0.016138442,0.00020990844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014600139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014903764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005812242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008605886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009134471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030738473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092744451","doi":"10.1167/14.10.335","title":"Attention improves precision while short-term memory load increases guessing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Orientation (vector space); Task (project management); Working memory; Luminance; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Neuroscience; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07448650184939973,"score_gpt":0.3909923257426867,"score_spread":0.31650582389328696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092744451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980894,0.00016121843,0.0011765172,0.000054603322,0.000011345693,0.000010027961,0.000014211792,0.000033351298,0.0004494296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99773586,0.00009252307,0.0015539353,0.000055626966,0.000017047705,0.000014378543,0.000031503056,0.00001869241,0.00048038122],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993839,0.00010234972,0.00008665589,0.00015264977,0.00019287615,0.00008158413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949366,0.0028522008,0.0010017634,0.00071786833,0.00018329111,0.00030834525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092195877,0.0004874188,0.0007186921,0.00028399407,0.00015401699,0.00070349866,0.00052521424,0.0005689966,0.0024533768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066562737,0.00033352352,0.00029903103,0.00019372509,0.00044901637,0.00086457114,0.00096954824,0.00057506864,0.00036583928],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009428152,0.001362833,0.012250452,0.00034880984,0.00016868598,0.00018120039,0.0005722159,0.00078937405,0.89421076,0.00028758228,0.0002915013,0.080108434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014060861,0.01287328,0.463122,0.00006883041,0.0006163741,0.00066389644,0.00024821417,0.016103351,0.49824688,0.0045879553,0.0019261205,0.00013702355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074973213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007327701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024533768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026596745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019507001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008207381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092932206","doi":"10.1037/a0018039","title":"Spontaneous trait inferences and organisational actions: The formation of organisation personality perceptions.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Trait; Personality; Social psychology; Perception; Impression formation; Big Five personality traits; Social perception","score_opus":0.22290343623434514,"score_gpt":0.33579183511071176,"score_spread":0.11288839887636662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092932206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918451,0.0001811522,0.0048103393,0.00007997525,0.000009758434,0.000027815213,0.000067634974,0.000017091017,0.0029611075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99685174,0.00009743884,0.0025661655,0.000029242889,0.0000057810626,0.000016888867,0.000068717614,0.000004016235,0.00035996205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876475,0.00067451305,0.00005273519,0.00018870688,0.0002684978,0.00005079907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827543,0.008684912,0.00558737,0.0016353076,0.0007403429,0.00059783785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024858958,0.00020986368,0.00016582235,0.0005114146,0.0002466191,0.0016859767,0.00021190415,0.00047132955,0.0012871223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025286084,0.000211679,0.00020372862,0.00033087464,0.0005882291,0.0008657776,0.000677091,0.0004972784,0.00016761103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010602439,0.0007255668,0.7351619,0.0005085549,0.00038960474,0.0004656963,0.021417772,0.0020018208,0.06262791,0.0058424245,0.0005605832,0.1692379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018355708,0.00041436276,0.9843417,0.000044578923,0.000059844926,0.00021038372,0.0022438255,0.003877155,0.0033798043,0.0044559413,0.0009035768,0.000050620292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015554086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024795637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024858958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030711936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003056294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013146877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092942349","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.04.008","title":"Dual process theory and the context of choice: Comments on Dhar and Gorlin","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Heuristics; Normative; Psychology; Dual (grammatical number); Variety (cybernetics); Differential (mechanical device); Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Differential effects; Cognitive psychology; Dual process theory (moral psychology); Social psychology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Cognitive science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Moral reasoning; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09028027782625299,"score_gpt":0.4553739622883071,"score_spread":0.36509368446205415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092942349","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009883305,0.015754825,0.0007840791,0.9747565,0.003281,0.0000094747975,0.000039183356,0.00001764395,0.0043690107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11517937,0.033741597,0.0044111586,0.79229313,0.042067003,0.00031699275,0.000067147026,0.00013639865,0.011787199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99320084,0.004100557,0.00030212506,0.0010004704,0.0011482417,0.00024780966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94404125,0.05058428,0.00076835573,0.0009815018,0.0030322156,0.0005924757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015264189,0.0011495589,0.00215735,0.0016672718,0.004709595,0.0060303174,0.0069970703,0.022061761,0.004985597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0313419,0.0007117487,0.001303348,0.002288464,0.024516296,0.02051528,0.004647571,0.02991798,0.0017879647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085957494,0.000044073317,0.0002589234,0.00019680707,0.000016291835,0.00035718357,0.0024236098,0.0004532818,0.00007928319,0.68726146,0.30235636,0.0064667477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106257685,0.0000439703,0.00057010754,0.00065395545,0.00001758531,0.00024967,0.0018590261,0.0015580665,0.00016452208,0.7146934,0.27998233,0.0001012092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00913626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005102207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022061761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062039844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026644813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08072567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093001776","doi":"10.1177/1948550610375722","title":"Good Intentions, Optimistic Self-Predictions, and Missed Opportunities","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Psychological and Personality Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Service (business); Social psychology; Control (management); Marketing; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.3662162631969721,"score_gpt":0.46601707931043607,"score_spread":0.09980081611346397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093001776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97764057,0.0002635632,0.0034916599,0.00042028807,0.000030913987,0.00008284926,0.0001712213,0.00002931509,0.017869717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998408,0.00007843965,0.00078416127,0.0000649571,0.000010989521,0.000043035154,0.00008752011,0.000005686318,0.0005172107],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966073,0.0014107698,0.00034277016,0.00032473108,0.0010240499,0.0002904027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91855824,0.04411836,0.023803316,0.0063436716,0.002947661,0.004228731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007513308,0.0004795527,0.00041455848,0.001242157,0.0005303743,0.0021833074,0.00045212163,0.001093285,0.0034140004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051229846,0.00047180607,0.00046611458,0.00054490386,0.0025930614,0.0017628202,0.0019175475,0.0017541551,0.00038292786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011294362,0.0008335278,0.9462253,0.00017964609,0.0002920998,0.00020759035,0.0028311242,0.0021383036,0.0012832893,0.007992162,0.0005811946,0.03630645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003332176,0.0006306765,0.9734543,0.00007565148,0.00014414612,0.00035518478,0.0016007066,0.0037871439,0.0009908156,0.017842218,0.0009997884,0.00008592103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008503582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015066233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007513308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049970386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047205528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03973466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093195784","doi":"10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.009","title":"Environments for fast and slow thinking","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Trends in Cognitive Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.6635712376650964,"score_gpt":0.5627856902786511,"score_spread":0.1007855473864453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093195784","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002786152,0.996367,0.00047845312,0.0011501479,0.00017420998,0.000002749391,0.000013307956,0.0000063184366,0.0015291923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0053007863,0.9924452,0.0005504239,0.00084117334,0.00043819097,0.000013858086,0.000022196706,0.0000039656247,0.00038416882],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995497,0.00016152146,0.00004432125,0.00009479939,0.00011314741,0.000036477075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980507,0.0014467688,0.00022063438,0.000052362248,0.00015319728,0.0000763438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010629725,0.0007598454,0.0014177355,0.0014346964,0.00029072323,0.0019897325,0.00095450657,0.0017426338,0.0039630453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029334747,0.0002706128,0.00041243408,0.0017700157,0.0021798054,0.0028975704,0.0012180598,0.0019499515,0.0008741657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011653074,0.000057674522,0.0005881292,0.019505566,0.00015975084,0.0001660647,0.00014130711,0.0004963119,0.0005564511,0.06309697,0.024178466,0.8909368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084542036,0.00010407579,0.004651804,0.020802211,0.00037758244,0.0015279895,0.00037585688,0.0002790011,0.0005743954,0.13308378,0.8380674,0.00007140503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010467736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002187351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039630453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088513544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017877027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013257742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094521969","doi":"10.1080/00036846.2014.889801","title":"Inducing risk preferences in multi-stage multi-agent laboratory experiments","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Computer science; Binary number; Implementation; External validity; Outcome (game theory); Proof of concept; Range (aeronautics); Management science; Economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Microeconomics; Social psychology; Psychology; Mathematics; Software engineering; Business","score_opus":0.24982741796569363,"score_gpt":0.40417372918367966,"score_spread":0.15434631121798603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094521969","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3216544,0.0003981374,0.6611435,0.001370588,0.00021545509,0.0030654294,0.00018562976,0.00039494058,0.011571883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75903004,0.00027863416,0.23406227,0.0005712,0.000049732414,0.0041029854,0.00006018822,0.000029993756,0.0018149602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.96838945,0.025229845,0.0010776065,0.0022462397,0.002317143,0.00073963427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90766644,0.06810311,0.011871722,0.009111858,0.0016949071,0.0015519686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04169657,0.001346785,0.0017140451,0.00067878375,0.0007344518,0.0031544918,0.003799513,0.0024592807,0.0041763084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.094565056,0.001314451,0.00111395,0.0006447254,0.0041652,0.0042527732,0.003020638,0.0036035774,0.00050808775],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011897906,0.009228338,0.008133085,0.0026156816,0.0007635355,0.0002894728,0.0024116628,0.14536881,0.053012583,0.6492498,0.0016182757,0.11541086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050535584,0.01724407,0.0059319604,0.0004491178,0.00035696596,0.00013114547,0.00032025756,0.27890283,0.029425398,0.6553958,0.006474303,0.00031463103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034625575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027362202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04169657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015097737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001545877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22051513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095628489","doi":"10.1037/hea0000203","title":"Trust in deliberation: The consequences of deliberative decision strategies for medical decisions.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"European Association of Social Psychology","keywords":"Deliberation; Decision aids; Debiasing; Psychology; Decision quality; Preference; Decision analysis; Quality (philosophy); Social psychology; Applied psychology; Medicine; Patient satisfaction; Political science; Epistemology; Nursing; Economics","score_opus":0.4095407242403531,"score_gpt":0.5695376546357794,"score_spread":0.15999693039542634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095628489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8230239,0.008229556,0.08856398,0.025453208,0.0004162271,0.00040656814,0.00014204324,0.00016224384,0.05360225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922241,0.000572812,0.006100972,0.0006571488,0.000037891783,0.000079803656,0.000018551074,0.000011541274,0.0002971341],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.963111,0.031474475,0.0011489623,0.0008426699,0.002659886,0.00076306827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6533272,0.30590498,0.026600894,0.006893199,0.0034141894,0.0038594506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034872845,0.00053909153,0.00030320746,0.00070427643,0.0009324903,0.0031962637,0.0006246637,0.0017117547,0.004637983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23791169,0.0004034154,0.00067642116,0.0004558544,0.005720016,0.0039785895,0.003257341,0.0029316687,0.00033510118],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008073317,0.002139983,0.16590057,0.004319065,0.0012667034,0.0016530848,0.032635834,0.022436425,0.008130446,0.2826561,0.007757446,0.46303102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013852827,0.0053598876,0.12585098,0.0040466525,0.00095214945,0.0025342836,0.01499182,0.058738727,0.013523143,0.73917663,0.033039693,0.00040077773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004881216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005125927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034872845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001590523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022526584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18442744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096285078","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.10.002","title":"Willingness to pay for advice: The role of rational and experiential processing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Willingness to pay; Experiential learning; Priming (agriculture); Information processing; Psychology; Social psychology; Marketing; Business; Economics; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.050387135522687684,"score_gpt":0.364274753712633,"score_spread":0.3138876181899453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096285078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9135224,0.001047813,0.0357669,0.005272022,0.00011698678,0.00015046504,0.000121327335,0.000071537754,0.04393048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99359024,0.0002444442,0.005062455,0.00025278237,0.000049030412,0.000033536624,0.00003551746,0.000021315549,0.0007106823],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964735,0.0021694954,0.000119141274,0.00032911025,0.0006542187,0.00025458506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9046266,0.08388264,0.00399787,0.0029132338,0.0025065134,0.0020732032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007528139,0.0004420937,0.00040505332,0.00074550306,0.00044994915,0.0051805237,0.0007982898,0.0021203302,0.008267832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084874414,0.00038109656,0.00040884287,0.0005237233,0.0017647006,0.003017873,0.00092697993,0.0021519565,0.00040904034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00479265,0.00640637,0.16688783,0.0010348024,0.00092974195,0.00081264094,0.009576159,0.033137318,0.014172135,0.36376217,0.0040486027,0.39443955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038112537,0.0007208511,0.14890812,0.00023229569,0.00027618094,0.00042377214,0.0029300754,0.08836619,0.0027454896,0.7512667,0.0035601386,0.00018899397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012808773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008267832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008068437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013664634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0398131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096323387","doi":"10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.226","title":"The psychophysics of contingency assessment.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Contingency; Psychophysics; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Contingency management; Perception; Epistemology","score_opus":0.19880600632582315,"score_gpt":0.5226753290690482,"score_spread":0.3238693227432251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096323387","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29258624,0.008613141,0.6057098,0.0028546029,0.0010737802,0.0011270395,0.00066044624,0.000914843,0.086460166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9039238,0.0014755086,0.090504766,0.0005152315,0.00010558287,0.00033251525,0.00008089693,0.00007257414,0.0029891208],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990252,0.00032787712,0.000047558366,0.00016346699,0.00040370325,0.000032222313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977234,0.0015063095,0.00024227212,0.0002462066,0.0002036054,0.000078227094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015159516,0.00025340993,0.00016930272,0.00040114188,0.00023116656,0.0011917725,0.00041876093,0.00050698133,0.005374798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007234989,0.00019812016,0.00026867515,0.0003115141,0.0007850979,0.0007813929,0.0007725334,0.0012772493,0.00045700392],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013374203,0.00064666045,0.009716786,0.0012561295,0.00010137944,0.00028076916,0.001470327,0.0060306867,0.42227972,0.09979931,0.003764222,0.4533166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030115905,0.0037915662,0.224755,0.00047719607,0.00017312854,0.0062967874,0.0010831953,0.1263549,0.17683958,0.3830123,0.07660225,0.00031292657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032855014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023163935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005374798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039198014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034719732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017980456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097189960","doi":"10.1509/jmkr.46.6.764","title":"The Impact of Outcome Elaboration on Susceptibility to Contextual and Presentation Biases","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Elaboration; Presentation (obstetrics); Elaboration likelihood model; Framing (construction); Framing effect; Psychology; Outcome (game theory); Social psychology; Investment decisions; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Behavioral economics; Finance; Medicine; Persuasion","score_opus":0.4183875299233983,"score_gpt":0.5932202538708223,"score_spread":0.17483272394742405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097189960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98986596,0.00052140333,0.0024592006,0.00027468568,0.000022951339,0.000056606856,0.000032494834,0.000025832242,0.006740797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984006,0.00017279561,0.001002364,0.000057542835,0.000022432143,0.000020084392,0.000026629152,0.000010153291,0.00028743446],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99174833,0.0049512773,0.00082038395,0.0005377503,0.001554357,0.00038796882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6435236,0.31235653,0.027051203,0.011789622,0.003884694,0.0013943182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011640923,0.0004408987,0.00038087412,0.0010456374,0.0004575176,0.00272913,0.00044841965,0.0011413362,0.004136853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15258661,0.00028733528,0.00069233484,0.0006356842,0.0011579595,0.0022092925,0.002275862,0.001227059,0.00031193078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007634675,0.0019115614,0.7448295,0.0016731689,0.0012081256,0.00086448196,0.019871233,0.004076328,0.039608043,0.009184749,0.0009253771,0.16821283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044498607,0.004427401,0.8895193,0.00079556985,0.0023741273,0.0018290577,0.010143584,0.012552859,0.039839722,0.031452633,0.0063431356,0.0002776429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004466569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033941487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011640923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003304065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034113612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06156379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097216221","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1597946","title":"Axiom of Monotonicity: An Experimental Test","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Von Neumann architecture; Mathematics; Axiom independence; Test (biology); Expected utility hypothesis; Pure mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Geology","score_opus":0.11636289637144628,"score_gpt":0.39860079287675776,"score_spread":0.2822378965053115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097216221","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33592457,0.00089433487,0.34496707,0.030397307,0.0018433444,0.0016093861,0.0060047186,0.00063617976,0.2777232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9255284,0.0005993955,0.05841288,0.004362875,0.0010419285,0.0019962387,0.001904154,0.00017411393,0.0059799496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98427975,0.00846138,0.001457824,0.0027475557,0.0022909392,0.000762518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7186443,0.23112479,0.006964528,0.02921434,0.011656963,0.0023950066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027024163,0.0015695909,0.002650899,0.0015410396,0.002098861,0.0031753802,0.004091838,0.004723072,0.05313321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13752659,0.0006806594,0.002179825,0.0013333084,0.0066290004,0.013641192,0.0045132297,0.0046733865,0.002388944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021609254,0.0014377779,0.0025280009,0.0006252061,0.00021221227,0.00018322509,0.00044777212,0.0017826863,0.0018407191,0.95557666,0.0070782565,0.026126524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00125226,0.0006721415,0.0014363009,0.000097525866,0.00008665465,0.00020024086,0.00032099534,0.0138246,0.0013740706,0.9759846,0.0047081183,0.000042448857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006098935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003405363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05313321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001577558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031905717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17774826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097949912","doi":"10.1086/656570","title":"The Locus of Choice: Personal Causality and Satisfaction with Hedonic and Utilitarian Decisions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":378,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Causality (physics); Valence (chemistry); Social psychology; Consumption (sociology); Attribution; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.23888570809045664,"score_gpt":0.49747238384875897,"score_spread":0.2585866757583023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097949912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99621034,0.00005522248,0.000997495,0.0000746806,0.0000040212753,0.000009952268,0.00002284186,0.0000045664206,0.0026208835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946016,0.000019171739,0.0002668879,0.000016149044,0.0000030778165,0.0000046190235,0.00002470112,0.000002764399,0.00020252552],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979685,0.0011538845,0.00012794299,0.00015010223,0.00047204408,0.00012751092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820691,0.009502824,0.0046317265,0.0015274314,0.00075404515,0.0015149148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037358534,0.0002421368,0.00028641845,0.0006043144,0.0003671439,0.0021037643,0.00025931964,0.00066004443,0.004397062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018367076,0.00020787159,0.00048797874,0.000623991,0.0014516908,0.000918667,0.0010169074,0.0010041522,0.00022613835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017730803,0.0020915973,0.9459568,0.00010522519,0.00036046124,0.00020143394,0.0033534598,0.0025481891,0.006193163,0.0057794848,0.00023253437,0.031404592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010500789,0.000872082,0.9814865,0.000023370263,0.0001038154,0.00024612728,0.0018666084,0.00493846,0.001572755,0.00814666,0.0005966773,0.000041862888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004962613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006191717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004397062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004042165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002658024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01975733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098440477","doi":"10.1257/0895330027274","title":"Evolution and Human Nature","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic Perspectives","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Generalization; Rationality; Simple (philosophy); Economics; Mathematical economics; Consumption (sociology); Positive economics; Neoclassical economics; Basis (linear algebra); Bounded rationality; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Sociology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.08608143798576275,"score_gpt":0.38544158849260474,"score_spread":0.299360150506842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098440477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.205521,0.058715947,0.04601858,0.09120563,0.0010719346,0.00007000202,0.0003018258,0.00019627213,0.59689873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9574198,0.009901344,0.007717226,0.004763883,0.00032510396,0.000033800643,0.00012423734,0.000040465147,0.019674169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937135,0.0002627995,0.000016665083,0.00017205595,0.000096073214,0.00008114059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993529,0.000283597,0.00007687753,0.00011472527,0.000096929514,0.00007496521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012542283,0.00020696188,0.00029524352,0.0005006946,0.0013013423,0.0024545232,0.00038780074,0.0014462803,0.004752461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00212255,0.00011330373,0.00017647604,0.00047217592,0.008762423,0.002709924,0.0015366984,0.0012606172,0.0006094934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023117353,0.000021830181,0.0041709375,0.00006693268,0.000026922662,0.0001641283,0.0021192941,0.0020511432,0.00051535026,0.9335818,0.004088636,0.053169854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008828839,0.00003418761,0.005443403,0.000071688104,0.000009909542,0.00034630465,0.0008403302,0.0011055159,0.00017868224,0.8371412,0.15480088,0.000019039418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027590508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019031172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004752461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014631219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076883676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015898526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098507972","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2015.1055274","title":"Rapid makes risky: Time pressure increases risk seeking in decisions from experience","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Gambling Research Institute, University of Calgary; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Risk-seeking; Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Actuarial science; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.20014104285725035,"score_gpt":0.45779549500493255,"score_spread":0.25765445214768223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098507972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99664474,0.00006274923,0.0004879727,0.00010995916,0.000011468108,0.0000092795435,0.00001813879,0.000008905541,0.0026467124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99825424,0.00006197366,0.0009365891,0.00013720524,0.000017103017,0.000027076458,0.00003217777,0.000016017902,0.0005175018],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991781,0.0003109877,0.000040294202,0.00019211687,0.00018792653,0.00009056793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99206793,0.0044924715,0.0016335846,0.0005645351,0.00015098516,0.0010904298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082947226,0.00023423498,0.00032631255,0.00017995008,0.00028851785,0.0011921063,0.00019951139,0.0005745572,0.007665628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009645174,0.0002501319,0.00023980276,0.0001654881,0.0006935651,0.00068420003,0.00091899926,0.00087648357,0.0002773664],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012152175,0.008930296,0.31251624,0.0012141413,0.00056961033,0.0023874242,0.01275513,0.0019468927,0.52356184,0.008813568,0.0024870427,0.11266574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002954814,0.004490377,0.9653799,0.000095637915,0.00022375605,0.0008973472,0.0017302018,0.0025880595,0.014006859,0.0070240037,0.0031743138,0.00009409828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004196447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051501207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007665628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018593886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002447034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025644124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098762910","doi":"10.1027/1618-3169/a000043","title":"Prime Proportion Affects Masked Priming of Fixed and Free-Choice Responses","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Priming (agriculture); Psychology; Prime (order theory); Response priming; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Communication; Audiology; Neuroscience; Mathematics; Biology; Cognition; Lexical decision task; Medicine; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.14740292458741788,"score_gpt":0.49836681132233696,"score_spread":0.3509638867349191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098762910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996488,0.00023258827,0.0015666133,0.000037173722,0.000046965913,0.000024689796,0.000050941602,0.00005809652,0.0014949947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967763,0.000093657734,0.0021204583,0.0000653144,0.000022132874,0.00004269837,0.00005798528,0.0000926262,0.0007288401],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991949,0.00021500698,0.0000680367,0.00023615024,0.00016249262,0.0001234055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952739,0.003291187,0.000558926,0.00028088473,0.00017933403,0.000415717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009301854,0.00038969432,0.0006823351,0.00026596998,0.00015473223,0.00056460826,0.0003385672,0.0005103535,0.0054219807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063959556,0.00041280815,0.00021299212,0.00016324695,0.0004957181,0.0005391555,0.0005867861,0.00073631725,0.00054332154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030564305,0.00009379112,0.0013091092,0.000071858936,0.00001069982,0.000045184148,0.00005346055,0.000071637995,0.99189854,0.00021518092,0.000034656576,0.0031394374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003264339,0.0025588612,0.13487676,0.000042060994,0.00017180888,0.0007610305,0.00008477469,0.0055688275,0.8533277,0.001328118,0.0008983412,0.000055309123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023992764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025374623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054219807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023085269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024176814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01813829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099097516","doi":"10.1017/s0022109009990019","title":"Probability Judgment Error and Speculation in Laboratory Asset Market Bubbles","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Irrationality; Speculation; Asset (computer security); Aggregate (composite); Economics; Econometrics; Stochastic game; Dimension (graph theory); Bubble; Financial economics; Rationality; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.12865268021857032,"score_gpt":0.39953894716552374,"score_spread":0.2708862669469534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099097516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981254,0.000012122681,0.0014225061,0.000027431173,0.000010381378,0.0000470242,0.0000318331,0.00001783267,0.0003054522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970099,0.000011044223,0.0022222886,0.00003876545,0.000012975999,0.00022101388,0.000059243277,0.000010126904,0.00041471157],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720407,0.0014645379,0.00020348294,0.00043981415,0.00050547713,0.00018264374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96320695,0.023326218,0.006772748,0.0039807493,0.0011043726,0.0016089204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043097804,0.00047866214,0.00057957997,0.00032988025,0.00029811615,0.0008376561,0.0005461937,0.0007968526,0.0029924007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03377363,0.0003814784,0.00024258392,0.00017484833,0.0010224724,0.0006421137,0.00087547064,0.0011879932,0.00022940738],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04497889,0.080521196,0.34002474,0.00051213417,0.00074638723,0.00071258843,0.0042742775,0.018210828,0.4242613,0.007047663,0.002405767,0.0763042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003953504,0.124725886,0.5366431,0.000099426485,0.00044004215,0.00086810195,0.0010183554,0.11173119,0.19538318,0.022324951,0.002469628,0.00034268296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037408955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034910048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043097804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032407913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035131216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022792518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099195699","doi":"10.1287/deca.1100.0177","title":"The Role of Some Functional Equations in Decision Analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Analysis","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Differentiable function; Simple (philosophy); Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Decision theory; Functional equation; Expected utility hypothesis; Bayesian probability; Characterization (materials science); Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Differential equation; Mathematical analysis; Statistics","score_opus":0.055785507729414124,"score_gpt":0.37940877589865396,"score_spread":0.3236232681692398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099195699","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075799874,0.002604262,0.97455114,0.0031039931,0.00016607577,0.000033220032,0.000098912686,0.000056247653,0.011806184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4661555,0.008213355,0.5085258,0.0018686887,0.0012597413,0.00031798257,0.00027932954,0.00024277403,0.013136912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956462,0.0026904154,0.00023884031,0.00045868888,0.0007737947,0.0001921731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98744595,0.010543649,0.00047472445,0.00045822607,0.0008457077,0.00023162825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008343326,0.0013371112,0.0012811414,0.0018499908,0.0011486859,0.0019222951,0.0014771959,0.0023384942,0.0035268152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01839112,0.0006571496,0.002001258,0.0018702176,0.0049694385,0.007348143,0.0019262433,0.004689263,0.00055516604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034332452,0.0000083627365,0.00013723914,0.000054935907,0.000011777782,0.000022418722,0.00008099774,0.00798886,0.00013142831,0.98515576,0.00049565535,0.005909223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006605646,0.000010504375,0.00012596125,0.00003616216,0.000009015898,0.000036116973,0.000019211677,0.052963305,0.00011313405,0.94333345,0.003332803,0.000013787925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037790793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014235942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008343326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024928593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013791083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044124246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099443649","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12294","title":"THE DUAL‐PROCESS DRIFT DIFFUSION MODEL: EVIDENCE FROM RESPONSE TIMES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Diffusion; Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Econometrics; Decision process; Computer science; Key (lock); Economics; Simple (philosophy); Diffusion process; Operations research; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Innovation diffusion; Management science; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.31888650802808277,"score_gpt":0.4526974124004771,"score_spread":0.13381090437239435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099443649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8061364,0.00087542785,0.1764449,0.0028237444,0.00011332384,0.00020374672,0.00084348675,0.0004272484,0.012131722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796673,0.00030790878,0.016947426,0.00026691184,0.000056188168,0.00013045214,0.00037890932,0.00007381232,0.0021711446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977424,0.001243307,0.00010114093,0.00040993598,0.00031573995,0.00018752394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.916921,0.06647602,0.0056374576,0.0070008645,0.0022472674,0.001717384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0122774895,0.0006844296,0.0014856707,0.0010998846,0.00056966674,0.0021865969,0.002248137,0.0022433067,0.012981856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08445915,0.0005837751,0.0011227112,0.0013034529,0.0018000228,0.003918118,0.0013750965,0.003009801,0.0024178226],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009556108,0.0022519266,0.0958783,0.0008094698,0.00062487985,0.0008068805,0.003203184,0.23602024,0.013672709,0.5114051,0.010364629,0.115406625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006504242,0.00030718074,0.019792736,0.000032233755,0.0001076746,0.00032380983,0.00018865969,0.6657915,0.00094675604,0.30963573,0.0020934746,0.00012986004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004655711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015923285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012981856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012191753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064480986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06493032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099604660","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1623057","title":"Prospect Theory, Indifference Curves, and Hedging Risks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Prospect theory; Monotonic function; Mathematical economics; Function (biology); Expected utility hypothesis; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Simple (philosophy); Economics; Sign (mathematics); Decision theory; Cumulative prospect theory; Mathematics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.07755965383883055,"score_gpt":0.39455548387154354,"score_spread":0.316995830032713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099604660","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27861172,0.022841794,0.5852981,0.013129397,0.00042904727,0.00022373743,0.00060911034,0.00021527454,0.09864178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9614422,0.006474036,0.025133457,0.00038796436,0.00036674217,0.00013178,0.00018616952,0.000030629933,0.0058470718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959961,0.0027630695,0.00014219685,0.00029044278,0.00054599,0.00026205185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9483491,0.045863952,0.0022440075,0.0013768523,0.0010896578,0.001076372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012850765,0.0012982665,0.0019142631,0.003224151,0.0010532988,0.006663141,0.0017444445,0.004480876,0.009672504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05800341,0.00080216996,0.0012048526,0.0032647033,0.0054849135,0.0124160005,0.0022833648,0.004509425,0.000760601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014975347,0.000081916216,0.0016175674,0.00011936439,0.000041967305,0.00008033121,0.00025970853,0.023552576,0.00008258224,0.95874506,0.00095891865,0.014310183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013201888,0.000015402662,0.0002466328,0.000018588054,0.0000064420497,0.000026978996,0.000038721842,0.010210009,0.000012366547,0.9890933,0.00030910887,0.000009167811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013895882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064993475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012850765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018826732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011332532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06796211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099612900","doi":"10.1086/677840","title":"The Categorization of Time and Its Impact on Task Initiation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Task (project management); Psychology; Library science; Computer science; Data science; Information retrieval; Artificial intelligence; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.2159407105635714,"score_gpt":0.5187064700277652,"score_spread":0.30276575946419376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099612900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99019605,0.00015522238,0.0011864844,0.00012310689,0.00001864642,0.000039551156,0.00006604234,0.000034687415,0.008180237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971578,0.000077032324,0.0013450258,0.00003992533,0.000008741214,0.000056526533,0.00011082482,0.000046568286,0.0011575639],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99588984,0.0020150712,0.00023146054,0.0005752244,0.0008384892,0.0004498106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91311944,0.06416849,0.011244409,0.0040128715,0.0023332688,0.0051215244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00415914,0.0005183778,0.00050512614,0.0011328015,0.0009166228,0.0039510718,0.0007638977,0.0011809731,0.009760354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050616246,0.00037870233,0.0006505496,0.0008515449,0.0010693183,0.0017525094,0.002029341,0.0017956824,0.00087265973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020564133,0.0064130267,0.70687187,0.00056363153,0.0003894745,0.0011569931,0.021598937,0.007584697,0.097361654,0.013327819,0.0015811478,0.1225867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023824535,0.0027062586,0.96220744,0.00011624912,0.00015947013,0.0002580824,0.006134223,0.009101025,0.005580394,0.011006189,0.002338933,0.00015342163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034216226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021831817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009760354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014351106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00102312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032651603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099624208","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01232","title":"Visual representation of rational belief revision: another look at the Sleeping Beauty problem","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Beauty; Cognition; Representation (politics); Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Art; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.07546069025137843,"score_gpt":0.4222605587468244,"score_spread":0.346799868495446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099624208","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28741097,0.002482674,0.49808127,0.027605757,0.00079038733,0.00008418642,0.0008425433,0.0008158102,0.1818864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738317,0.0003198047,0.021843696,0.0004594147,0.00020968367,0.000027958833,0.00018587522,0.00009749894,0.0030243397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936646,0.0003180165,0.00002196426,0.00013359907,0.00010342568,0.00005656374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596906,0.002312895,0.00036462344,0.00083634525,0.00034268424,0.000174508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012595927,0.0003035511,0.0005460654,0.00065153954,0.0005579971,0.003620851,0.0011079775,0.0013873767,0.020222288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015947677,0.0003255491,0.0009519482,0.0005140922,0.0017065624,0.0054242574,0.0018241337,0.0016395904,0.0007322789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072704523,0.00011855287,0.0036822709,0.0002966446,0.00016529072,0.00046984025,0.0021499563,0.013847611,0.009526949,0.82585937,0.0093136225,0.1338429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006589385,0.000054497057,0.0020686565,0.000047596684,0.000031213178,0.00017095919,0.00027310706,0.05746462,0.00071086,0.9361969,0.002889689,0.000026000047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019755287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092812965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020222288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065071415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003633742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06765026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101259449","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x0700177x","title":"Frequency formats are a small part of the base rate story","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Base (topology); Neglect; Set (abstract data type); Extensional definition; Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Programming language; Mathematical analysis; Geology","score_opus":0.23596867891259238,"score_gpt":0.4007649844225061,"score_spread":0.1647963055099137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101259449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67095983,0.0029378876,0.18808681,0.017193276,0.0011204995,0.0003107431,0.0012709764,0.0012577118,0.116862275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616008,0.0007090483,0.031631943,0.0018103402,0.000317129,0.00015150105,0.00027778806,0.00033578844,0.0031657058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997267,0.0008260787,0.00027151447,0.0004021414,0.0011375559,0.000095691146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9574089,0.031533346,0.0029050552,0.0056732595,0.0016407724,0.0008387561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003044665,0.0006007333,0.00067751086,0.0005835982,0.0004921401,0.0031928262,0.0008832062,0.0014282056,0.009501425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031767063,0.0006439427,0.00038629535,0.00048493597,0.0035840757,0.012521799,0.0013094379,0.0032002327,0.00082551397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036320714,0.00080491777,0.011997147,0.001326489,0.00017203682,0.0008700016,0.0041114674,0.0018102439,0.25893053,0.5099656,0.006432578,0.19994693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045289827,0.0015819368,0.053730402,0.00044380306,0.00036841302,0.0035597703,0.0018154758,0.009359209,0.14993834,0.7207474,0.057702113,0.00030031937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002384594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016159187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009501425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042874762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037167783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03178543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102140188","doi":"10.1177/154193120504900344","title":"An Empirical Study of Calibration in Air Traffic Control Expert Judgment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Air traffic control; Probabilistic logic; Calibration; Control (management); Task (project management); Computer science; Aggregate (composite); Differential (mechanical device); Separation (statistics); Traffic conflict; Dempster–Shafer theory; Point (geometry); Mathematics; Statistics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Transport engineering; Traffic congestion","score_opus":0.06756849667941899,"score_gpt":0.3613776112737702,"score_spread":0.2938091145943512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102140188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979006,0.000047631027,0.0010379665,0.000023036331,0.000002474238,0.000013184973,0.00000952319,0.0000028311738,0.0009626854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948394,0.000021785028,0.00038791652,0.000018412313,0.0000029454052,0.000008010284,0.000016289445,0.0000017045446,0.000058930415],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908084,0.0054635475,0.00060106337,0.0010373758,0.0018136413,0.0002759562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7226068,0.23929387,0.02034337,0.009563557,0.0068049068,0.0013874788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011242807,0.00023536013,0.00027000534,0.0008545528,0.00043694084,0.0014339644,0.0005388853,0.0008535165,0.0015269476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18890435,0.00035013937,0.00022823537,0.00063610636,0.0017722364,0.0016217582,0.0012323415,0.0009828195,0.0001681702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022681486,0.0008187613,0.87988305,0.00023953101,0.0002912948,0.0005523862,0.036220822,0.0070134928,0.012870984,0.001622668,0.00052398874,0.0576949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008053168,0.0013884146,0.9574382,0.00010523063,0.000057732832,0.0012136155,0.010759402,0.019126238,0.0046405364,0.003425359,0.0016290336,0.00013559163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011349693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010512823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011242807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047342043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031401135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059458375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102173652","doi":"10.1037//1076-898x.6.3.171","title":"People focus on optimistic scenarios and disregard pessimistic scenarios while predicting task completion times.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Debiasing; Optimism; Task (project management); Psychology; Optimism bias; Hindsight bias; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.07007589911618983,"score_gpt":0.3848782485121402,"score_spread":0.31480234939595036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102173652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927584,0.00012372219,0.0040434655,0.00014799053,0.000013088839,0.000030024206,0.00005821771,0.00006896094,0.0027561695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99678576,0.000051728042,0.0027415645,0.00006409497,0.0000065967715,0.000021541833,0.0000732276,0.0000063473876,0.00024917917],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990017,0.00051112764,0.00006320224,0.00015371677,0.00020792782,0.000062345636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789863,0.015113757,0.0034679172,0.0011265064,0.0007110623,0.0005944024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031940434,0.00049150723,0.00026555368,0.0005546694,0.0003339104,0.0013810522,0.00030139202,0.00096346374,0.0019903565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034539334,0.00033883489,0.0003832633,0.00021811726,0.00037007369,0.0014916209,0.000491949,0.0007209147,0.00051070726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047014523,0.0009162344,0.81134295,0.00047237848,0.00059525855,0.00046170564,0.014210947,0.008438408,0.025841257,0.003987319,0.0038387382,0.12519333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004566912,0.0040530656,0.824777,0.00033337603,0.00060691213,0.0015325669,0.012165987,0.10638836,0.016861433,0.022217842,0.0102014085,0.00040543062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006410497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001035435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031940434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002254677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020979946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016891956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103448616","doi":"10.4284/0038-4038-78.3.878","title":"Nosy Preferences, Benevolence, and Efficiency","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southern Economic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Externality; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Microeconomics; Preference; Social preferences; Intervention (counseling); Revealed preference; Dynamic inconsistency; Mathematical economics; Positive economics; Public economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.1050548393513444,"score_gpt":0.3656873631541224,"score_spread":0.260632523802778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103448616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71450555,0.000587744,0.15208341,0.005655492,0.000046191457,0.000068666675,0.00012165883,0.000026700416,0.12690465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944517,0.00012238543,0.0031487,0.000090303,0.000017186701,0.000021681939,0.000013597823,0.0000034799587,0.002130968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980944,0.0010426667,0.00006979079,0.00020827199,0.00026623788,0.00031857393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496126,0.002482991,0.0012789505,0.0005864706,0.0002368918,0.00045347682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029149586,0.00038649904,0.00042121357,0.00049013714,0.00068096473,0.0022248672,0.0005838998,0.0010464041,0.0053011407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077322265,0.00022217157,0.00049599813,0.0005916818,0.0034858799,0.0024765744,0.001822836,0.0013366325,0.00019799476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007501399,0.000090182955,0.0037338897,0.00004322291,0.000031071784,0.0001324234,0.00035266817,0.018533774,0.0005414036,0.96609116,0.00042767468,0.009947615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031565327,0.0000863711,0.004360386,0.000031684765,0.000013911526,0.00016488937,0.00038683636,0.032823157,0.00033484888,0.9589412,0.002805838,0.000019221556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008614858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008660371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053011407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011554438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006875992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01773411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104262895","doi":"10.1017/s0963180108080067","title":"Affective Forecasting and Its Implications for Medical Ethics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Mental health; Medical ethics; Variety (cybernetics); Psychology; Medical humanities; Sociology; Law; Medicine; Psychiatry; Political science; Medical education; Computer science","score_opus":0.33309999016335373,"score_gpt":0.5106748121936675,"score_spread":0.17757482203031377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104262895","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028389258,0.019310605,0.0213273,0.7323958,0.0030287497,0.00006592526,0.00006908157,0.00006065222,0.19535258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95351726,0.006413001,0.00553143,0.028195154,0.0032943713,0.00012394789,0.000026456151,0.000027577,0.0028708542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97529477,0.018100671,0.00065800716,0.0011559669,0.00367203,0.001118497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94242585,0.043536987,0.0041112946,0.002735321,0.004629801,0.0025607906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024854194,0.0004880539,0.0004926473,0.0021775072,0.0057802247,0.008508756,0.0014385408,0.0058741285,0.0031120086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071758196,0.0003080595,0.0005693376,0.0018443036,0.03952692,0.01084253,0.005226704,0.009244868,0.0005366062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000508054,0.0000463889,0.0015356283,0.00007343855,0.0000131682755,0.00017032753,0.010064571,0.0008129612,0.00009274901,0.9476053,0.011260599,0.028273946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010550967,0.000012448734,0.0013489849,0.00011415744,0.0000044746557,0.00010218885,0.003340942,0.0007412366,0.000050921182,0.97985655,0.014392946,0.000024508443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004358972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023663952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024854194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008328828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054723592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13144314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104463177","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.003","title":"Probability matching in choice under uncertainty: Intuition versus deliberation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Intuition; Deliberation; Psychology; Exploit; Matching (statistics); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Computer science; Cognitive science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2730349298543821,"score_gpt":0.42630204457183013,"score_spread":0.15326711471744803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104463177","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35113743,0.0031400924,0.60059917,0.01485974,0.00030649704,0.00013527185,0.00013893849,0.00014054556,0.029542357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96568465,0.0007788032,0.032026507,0.0004355,0.00020023342,0.00007061406,0.00004423638,0.000020739306,0.0007387239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99030685,0.006247529,0.00053755357,0.0012373675,0.0011039333,0.00056681485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92602944,0.062070247,0.004944018,0.0035274369,0.002013376,0.0014154188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018553622,0.0006024081,0.0015960109,0.0014980342,0.00078420097,0.007987258,0.0018282415,0.0036148727,0.0061505223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0928991,0.00075209147,0.0014756992,0.0011788758,0.0070613674,0.014420014,0.0023921758,0.0027547693,0.00046912426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044761336,0.00030846836,0.0048445375,0.00040575484,0.0003589992,0.00016175376,0.0011154045,0.03579324,0.0010575479,0.9215996,0.0010841727,0.032822877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002668237,0.000027531643,0.000756188,0.000019505906,0.000024037243,0.000029038474,0.0000773203,0.028339174,0.00014139939,0.97034687,0.0001920779,0.000020159283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013933476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007581938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018553622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018801321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020036174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09812212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104694716","doi":"10.1017/s193029750000214x","title":"Bracketing effects on risk tolerance: Generalizability and underlying mechanisms","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Bracketing (phenomenology); Generalizability theory; Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0798934455622458,"score_gpt":0.39101243165103944,"score_spread":0.3111189860887936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104694716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736525,0.00037963083,0.01208604,0.0002998966,0.000035533314,0.00008936405,0.00010225804,0.00012459689,0.013230209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977295,0.00010350925,0.0017336027,0.000075075695,0.000028077371,0.000031405067,0.000041656724,0.000021108224,0.00023607549],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730057,0.00080238533,0.00017273398,0.00075610797,0.0008096242,0.0001585881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9251395,0.050452292,0.0080452645,0.01349539,0.0016143989,0.0012531497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006467689,0.00042758722,0.0010639228,0.0010928503,0.0002776646,0.0014656619,0.0008205891,0.00080843974,0.0077331997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048996612,0.00059796195,0.0007245109,0.0005303412,0.0020605125,0.0018610833,0.0022494881,0.0014936414,0.00033500537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012934568,0.0054470147,0.34296185,0.0019154941,0.0022116834,0.0014069555,0.008129802,0.02445568,0.22608523,0.09101693,0.0021954798,0.2812394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003437369,0.0015912903,0.824393,0.00012502426,0.0006658803,0.0006857359,0.00058973784,0.01830665,0.023391975,0.1282145,0.0015416653,0.00015095192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007204892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002701637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077331997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002954522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028986775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03420478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105153401","doi":"10.1111/j.1936-4490.2002.tb00665.x","title":"The Neglect of Base Rate Data by Human Resources Managers in Employee Selection","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Base (topology); Neglect; Factorial analysis; Computer science; Operations research; Welfare economics; Statistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.3194110214112298,"score_gpt":0.408064228159764,"score_spread":0.08865320674853422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105153401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97574776,0.00059803145,0.017034462,0.00036859428,0.0000597006,0.00022183241,0.00013204495,0.00005306849,0.0057844664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992167,0.00020516377,0.0068670423,0.00011815996,0.000039905408,0.00018560527,0.00006447686,0.000014901141,0.00033777303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.87728876,0.096902646,0.004422358,0.0028456985,0.017250909,0.0012896021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5083457,0.4298251,0.0331208,0.015296011,0.011198695,0.002213676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08228461,0.000592346,0.0008535551,0.0016400918,0.0010541842,0.0032573023,0.00091283943,0.0009666548,0.0017568081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28207594,0.0007097678,0.0006189482,0.0011862157,0.0014037229,0.0023501809,0.0019574678,0.0013754325,0.00041517624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012459066,0.0009692141,0.54938954,0.0009733356,0.0006404376,0.0003181715,0.024285888,0.010337628,0.011836773,0.0035671194,0.00095124036,0.38427168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038848346,0.010318438,0.9009847,0.0013969548,0.00065573154,0.0007563979,0.013759931,0.037043933,0.016771631,0.008116013,0.009282299,0.0005254948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024070367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020781325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08228461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011837279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012446448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4351678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106603618","doi":"10.1509/jmkr.44.3.379","title":"Mental Simulation and Preference Consistency over Time: The Role of Process- versus Outcome-Focused Thoughts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Focus (optics); Process (computing); Psychology; Mental model; Computer science; Social psychology; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.3375896713148078,"score_gpt":0.526534674367092,"score_spread":0.18894500305228418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106603618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99207884,0.00012916619,0.004249669,0.00015454806,0.00001594303,0.000021355017,0.000021185557,0.000017794557,0.0033114513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974426,0.000056098004,0.0021223282,0.00004620899,0.000011050251,0.000020102143,0.000051809835,0.000014033518,0.00023581569],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954242,0.0028046274,0.00030576595,0.00048798256,0.0007751587,0.00020221964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88074803,0.092276245,0.013622024,0.008720756,0.0023691154,0.0022638985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008867738,0.00038021445,0.00050159055,0.00093281455,0.0004482325,0.004519659,0.00062347174,0.0011517989,0.0033263527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08076527,0.0004151236,0.00094903127,0.0007493826,0.0016997261,0.00270568,0.0011991314,0.001629025,0.00018308722],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011729657,0.0046356292,0.73160386,0.0006640375,0.0024559912,0.0007093987,0.026593007,0.019405177,0.022281911,0.033627592,0.0008658996,0.14542781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000756619,0.0027123592,0.8632901,0.00018450971,0.0009205668,0.0006907396,0.0072947703,0.046766754,0.00489077,0.06997918,0.0020857933,0.0004278164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011949929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009018295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008867738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007772664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005780929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04689765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106910765","doi":"10.1037/e527312012-437","title":"Examination of the Belief Bias Effect Across Two Domains of Reasoning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"PsycEXTRA Dataset","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Blackberry (Canada)","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Confirmation bias; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1452255819973375,"score_gpt":0.4483448199623918,"score_spread":0.30311923796505424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106910765","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044140402,0.0009076402,0.00083925424,0.00093946635,0.000115417766,0.0002231744,0.9485411,0.0005942572,0.0036993807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044643275,0.00027090608,0.0024681108,0.00016761628,0.000027790431,0.000553817,0.9506164,0.0000594008,0.0011926146],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743986,0.0006857078,0.00038120826,0.0005509213,0.000751459,0.0001908658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98490995,0.009483115,0.0015627677,0.0017595236,0.0018291222,0.00045556296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004644184,0.0014314178,0.001280773,0.0045588003,0.0007113056,0.001958848,0.0024795942,0.0015313932,0.01002887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026526691,0.0004003637,0.0012414597,0.0053981603,0.00058206584,0.0010314642,0.002157314,0.0022960673,0.0066607394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002129779,0.001178435,0.10736796,0.0041247564,0.00079930905,0.00023648518,0.00031049893,0.007848738,0.00079208345,0.004150969,0.8208564,0.050204646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005144622,0.00072255585,0.38385648,0.0012694922,0.00088677433,0.0015474441,0.0011466861,0.06309477,0.0040635145,0.016594995,0.5213966,0.00027614745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015607109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022161448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015607109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019923276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015937225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033549905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106984223","doi":"10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00098-6","title":"Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Frequency; Psychology; Weighting; Set (abstract data type); Word lists by frequency; Bayesian probability; Judgement; Bayesian inference; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Bayes' theorem; Base (topology); Posterior probability; Word (group theory); Selection (genetic algorithm); Bayesian statistics; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.20417059624771422,"score_gpt":0.40108066347240307,"score_spread":0.19691006722468885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106984223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69372743,0.001787642,0.25456563,0.0044623055,0.0007253443,0.0003256592,0.00045536834,0.00034753696,0.043603204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95603484,0.00068406115,0.03849729,0.00042038216,0.0008534227,0.00025163908,0.00028294753,0.00015935696,0.0028161756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914009,0.00483627,0.0008705929,0.00078029657,0.0017372953,0.00037467811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7065653,0.27532583,0.0064735687,0.005977289,0.0040100617,0.0016477943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011305074,0.00078146544,0.0010296126,0.0030596037,0.00067270536,0.0077441507,0.0016931149,0.0029830246,0.01863724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.170985,0.0010046944,0.0012958192,0.0019833425,0.00326913,0.025129065,0.00219932,0.0029125079,0.001315733],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035787902,0.0014082583,0.025756424,0.0009511203,0.0001821922,0.0004998176,0.0036898814,0.023831671,0.008023926,0.6884981,0.003081142,0.24049878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003153829,0.00031890252,0.007271261,0.00014399376,0.00009746042,0.00043860934,0.00070092245,0.056742683,0.0016967825,0.93080187,0.0013807783,0.000091306036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062060356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040212108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01863724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010105425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000761978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06234777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107140099","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1708662","title":"Conditioning and Updating Under Cumulative Prospect Theory","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Cumulative prospect theory; Conditioning; Prospect theory; Econometrics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04169701125775222,"score_gpt":0.37357937343413244,"score_spread":0.33188236217638023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107140099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5255263,0.0018927823,0.4442939,0.0036542276,0.0003246892,0.000100780955,0.0003426632,0.00042248928,0.023442155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832129,0.0008335442,0.011489749,0.00017017272,0.00020000347,0.00004280902,0.00011131807,0.000039528193,0.0039001112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975943,0.0010314198,0.00016868864,0.00047984262,0.00045030855,0.00027547136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91114473,0.073438704,0.006145946,0.0051506627,0.0026893932,0.0014305664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073289336,0.0006188313,0.0017509952,0.0013443372,0.0006564704,0.0043324316,0.0013912222,0.0019150268,0.0069679683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076090634,0.00086744106,0.0009689965,0.001401535,0.0028551545,0.008662544,0.0016072929,0.0028725374,0.0003924314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005002607,0.0001815361,0.0056675225,0.00014028892,0.0001460021,0.00018330954,0.0004536847,0.046539128,0.00094617705,0.8995059,0.0013469297,0.044389132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044579316,0.00004267343,0.0012780913,0.000013546302,0.000036897436,0.000054259104,0.000026459793,0.08136926,0.00020877244,0.91660154,0.00029952623,0.000024284553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023299227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011674433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073289336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010097601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011437889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03875953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107461833","doi":"10.1086/513048","title":"Explaining Cognitive Lock-In: The Role of Skill-Based Habits of Use in Consumer Choice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Consumption (sociology); Preference; Consumer choice; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; New product development; Psychology; Computer science; Microeconomics; Marketing; Economics; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.31521481904714405,"score_gpt":0.5151390014624746,"score_spread":0.19992418241533055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107461833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92238307,0.00024944506,0.0657907,0.0012841637,0.000024853787,0.000076194294,0.00006598893,0.00006309143,0.010062623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921943,0.000100512654,0.0068608294,0.00016858405,0.000016285036,0.000051799267,0.000032358414,0.000008438895,0.0005668655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992772,0.0003088979,0.00003329896,0.00012760329,0.00014619424,0.00010682609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977988,0.016466372,0.0029812923,0.0015769103,0.00057426695,0.00041310658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00232072,0.0005565059,0.00042028463,0.0006973413,0.00041377993,0.0013963451,0.00075953663,0.00095413113,0.0038978874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016670456,0.00027582925,0.0007003566,0.0005130994,0.0023127508,0.0022785065,0.0012728142,0.0012614003,0.0003404545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015196021,0.0031708293,0.4376417,0.0007811063,0.00045438815,0.0010377071,0.0119763585,0.046058938,0.018245328,0.31327224,0.0022428608,0.1635988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028056887,0.0014899403,0.17950645,0.00010265832,0.00020671563,0.0005489536,0.0018113205,0.17238794,0.007789085,0.63109624,0.004613129,0.00016701783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020590601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015060209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038978874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079444493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055993826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013039708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107488010","doi":"10.1086/322896","title":"Affect Monitoring and the Primacy of Feelings in Judgment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Psychology; Valence (chemistry); Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.39898533093959654,"score_gpt":0.5488671100228116,"score_spread":0.1498817790832151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107488010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800828,0.0007780115,0.0054924884,0.00016102433,0.000027837148,0.000019215337,0.000027370495,0.000022344964,0.013388982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987556,0.0001233444,0.00086730893,0.000026884316,0.000014616148,0.000006235248,0.000012518117,0.000008613205,0.00018489739],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985764,0.0006667102,0.0000893644,0.00022245228,0.00035483926,0.00009014959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98404735,0.010877903,0.0028718691,0.0012628085,0.00057546014,0.00036456014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021134424,0.00021520616,0.00019651851,0.00048626098,0.0003706404,0.0023402683,0.00018191228,0.00052249565,0.001407534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03140319,0.00026380713,0.00021681655,0.00027675886,0.0011527785,0.0015774544,0.0010467062,0.00072705094,0.0001365683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068834545,0.0007380119,0.3222085,0.001405415,0.0005331302,0.0011481859,0.02283173,0.0043269335,0.22419529,0.040471897,0.00091800216,0.37433943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007737873,0.0005755591,0.9390577,0.000096807205,0.00015769913,0.0006127151,0.0011500599,0.0036227345,0.01724783,0.03561515,0.0017061239,0.00008024689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037404997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034485006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023402683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027629273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018030149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011177123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108109108","doi":"10.7202/602099ar","title":"Prenons-nous assez de risque dans les théories du risque?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.08868676796405378,"score_gpt":0.34401250803978073,"score_spread":0.25532574007572695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108109108","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062669784,0.031620104,0.5454953,0.1037083,0.0025512334,0.00019664204,0.0006944042,0.00022359275,0.25284064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8772195,0.016531713,0.07302379,0.0058296807,0.0012067743,0.0004283978,0.00024090025,0.00017145598,0.02534775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99335116,0.0029881794,0.00034482047,0.0011621654,0.0017153217,0.00043837266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879808,0.007013215,0.0013367446,0.0014583475,0.0018624588,0.00034832713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074540824,0.0018694825,0.0017132448,0.0037433677,0.002371823,0.009235787,0.002927731,0.0038473306,0.011012849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021398334,0.0009597574,0.0019116992,0.003300359,0.0175466,0.018645134,0.003891631,0.007255136,0.0022798565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018866596,0.000025680036,0.0015140108,0.00014666376,0.00003977675,0.00004558118,0.0009418192,0.00097437575,0.00010883525,0.9822672,0.0009125426,0.013004736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009584343,0.000035137768,0.0010192193,0.00022969191,0.000039537998,0.00009414634,0.00086019136,0.0017681645,0.00017225243,0.97706723,0.018675718,0.000029088034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063871765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006777033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011012849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005077594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035486543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03942144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109177972","doi":"10.1287/deca.1030.0003","title":"Elicitation of Probabilities Using Competitive Scoring Rules","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Analysis","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scoring rule; Payment; Event (particle physics); Competition (biology); Construct (python library); Computer science; Econometrics; Subsidy; Economics; Actuarial science; Mathematical economics; Machine learning; Finance","score_opus":0.1691811700026969,"score_gpt":0.433281247962438,"score_spread":0.2641000779597411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109177972","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09237578,0.00007476109,0.89621997,0.0006279532,0.000050311457,0.0008708308,0.0003002285,0.00026708076,0.009213113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6095101,0.000107404936,0.3864793,0.00021549377,0.00007335754,0.0013080783,0.0003726299,0.00003939445,0.0018941228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95960206,0.025055557,0.0030606277,0.0035951096,0.007413348,0.0012732401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86170787,0.10806459,0.00836902,0.011525515,0.008485181,0.0018478514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025135504,0.00141489,0.0020909868,0.0013040676,0.0010756765,0.0026389833,0.002497615,0.0024023342,0.0037188067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.111007355,0.00071338593,0.0008538394,0.0017738407,0.0013143634,0.00354297,0.0028467486,0.0024904227,0.0011198518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013517217,0.0010324501,0.010606852,0.000407426,0.00029922137,0.0005426082,0.0016100142,0.25933567,0.012127177,0.36923394,0.00726909,0.33618388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019725786,0.00021647457,0.0010607913,0.000037366386,0.000041581865,0.00012623443,0.000090465874,0.7749478,0.005182205,0.21531373,0.002719757,0.00006625369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011619637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016964363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025135504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013437856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022144397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13293082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109631530","doi":"10.1093/imaman/dps024","title":"Integration-segregation decisions under general value functions: 'Create your own bundle--choose 1, 2 or all 3!'","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IMA Journal of Management Mathematics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio; Product (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Sign (mathematics); Microeconomics; Cover (algebra); Capital (architecture); Business; Economics; Computer science; Financial economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2693601958006623,"score_gpt":0.43260511778220817,"score_spread":0.1632449219815459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109631530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48754758,0.0004741803,0.45055088,0.0019743752,0.00010264055,0.000247593,0.00020618137,0.00021726466,0.058679342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9021307,0.0002307103,0.092721775,0.00021799988,0.00003861366,0.00014331892,0.00010989827,0.000057002133,0.004350022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563473,0.0015672534,0.0003036252,0.0009435018,0.00086558546,0.0006852624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933074,0.004123527,0.00080809736,0.0007360632,0.00054610026,0.00047886514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006373715,0.00074302003,0.0009335543,0.0008468077,0.0011013226,0.004118882,0.0010888148,0.0020325147,0.005185131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022921296,0.0004289293,0.0010599777,0.00077153876,0.0036001785,0.008343784,0.0019691994,0.0019899702,0.0007140465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028791252,0.00017121474,0.0042710616,0.00009050831,0.00006832675,0.0003765128,0.00056512316,0.033064082,0.0025535955,0.88682854,0.0021055667,0.06961759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003351404,0.000073994794,0.0015942003,0.000041189174,0.000029724288,0.00021337294,0.0001893705,0.10289111,0.0020991801,0.8898875,0.002908399,0.00003837511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010913351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010103341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006373715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013620768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075896503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033707857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110163890","doi":"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003894","title":"Some Work and Some Play: Microscopic and Macroscopic Approaches to Labor and Leisure","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Computational Biology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University; Gatsby Charitable Foundation","keywords":"Work (physics); Process (computing); Imperfect; Computation; Computer science; Markov process; Stochastic process; Statistical physics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics; Physics; Algorithm; Statistics","score_opus":0.17146928710499973,"score_gpt":0.35081374640989366,"score_spread":0.17934445930489393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110163890","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.114795186,0.00687133,0.5684687,0.04395806,0.00055147725,0.000081131475,0.00036137423,0.00015997559,0.26475275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95343095,0.0016223084,0.029416481,0.00093020615,0.0002915137,0.00009424614,0.00004267423,0.000076984565,0.014094637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920636,0.00039008254,0.000021521284,0.00012646169,0.00013901792,0.00011652462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856794,0.0007365621,0.00015295617,0.0002691455,0.00008294349,0.000190367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001314873,0.0005268912,0.0005311043,0.00076526863,0.0014985957,0.0038059005,0.0013637227,0.0017297931,0.0087509705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033089013,0.00055494916,0.00085681985,0.0006031386,0.011451587,0.008230623,0.002694638,0.002510718,0.00052444113],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008079169,0.0000092607825,0.00022612493,0.000014998083,0.000005309942,0.000023782557,0.0001822369,0.0036231456,0.000095924624,0.9938333,0.00034583788,0.0016318917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005505362,0.000009257173,0.00037187574,0.000020028283,0.000005126274,0.000027287471,0.00016613715,0.016168304,0.00006301304,0.9800842,0.0030710516,0.000008121559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053841006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004430296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0087509705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030526782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011939423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02927494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110284785","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.925223","title":"Inventor Perseverance After Being Told to Quit: The Role of Cognitive Biases","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.032761845232533504,"score_gpt":0.33494089573646146,"score_spread":0.30217905050392796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110284785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99749917,0.0002740488,0.0004556325,0.00039091837,0.000034951783,0.000011723178,0.00009113306,0.000006840966,0.0012355776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986779,0.00022495272,0.00029016085,0.000109432214,0.000038595317,0.000012158856,0.00011211849,0.0000059087733,0.0005286967],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976278,0.0009833493,0.00031067812,0.00033661167,0.0005234847,0.0002181693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81662506,0.13306972,0.029309781,0.01175181,0.004291643,0.004951966],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013345067,0.00042228136,0.0006210696,0.0010269231,0.0005339834,0.0027052965,0.0007760397,0.0018406826,0.004408154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11717541,0.0003659687,0.0007236342,0.00066270377,0.0011973224,0.0019308995,0.00073460577,0.002396286,0.0007362699],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010962235,0.00065044675,0.977122,0.000040815983,0.0003321769,0.0002181881,0.0011415925,0.0005388234,0.0007846443,0.0007994694,0.00021999629,0.017055525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007748543,0.0005613808,0.9864298,0.000042654498,0.00025938445,0.00054082903,0.0008927177,0.0029047232,0.0011521016,0.006641689,0.0004373164,0.000059939688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021506045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028580052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.999466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047192277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006465369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07057631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110669621","doi":"10.1177/1948550611415694","title":"This is Your Portfolio on Winter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Psychological and Personality Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Depression (economics); Risk aversion (psychology); Portfolio; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Finance; Economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Financial economics","score_opus":0.5698122209072847,"score_gpt":0.5101614510538217,"score_spread":0.05965076985346296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110669621","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009938639,0.0039444934,0.0011613223,0.011390233,0.013745155,0.00016027722,0.0027625856,0.0015195815,0.9553777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017341988,0.0021102591,0.0007332982,0.001718304,0.0018621683,0.000041025567,0.0014615923,0.00041260343,0.9743188],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995012,0.000057487887,0.00002983078,0.000055730492,0.00027064132,0.00008516245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799573,0.0001111224,0.00014094704,0.00021897008,0.0006605668,0.00087272935],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059644785,0.0005844326,0.00069479493,0.0012685136,0.0016316809,0.005267562,0.0007204486,0.0010304227,0.6472459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00391585,0.00019381597,0.00047405038,0.0010749737,0.00031730966,0.0026688145,0.0024309626,0.0010503012,0.4137612],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009670701,0.00007168632,0.0013499178,0.000097311786,0.00001360665,0.00013956614,0.000091275266,0.00005960498,0.00050627376,0.0030210456,0.84098285,0.15357019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009995909,0.000053361997,0.002405605,0.00007463731,0.0000051152992,0.0001312975,0.00014579228,0.00006797801,0.00018415622,0.0012308724,0.99568224,0.000009026478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012124031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026741542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6472459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005105586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083528605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50316095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110691199","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.338280","title":"How Should a Behavioral Economist Do Welfare Economics?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Welfare; Behavioral economics; Behavioural economics; Public economics; Neoclassical economics; Microeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.13637239068503698,"score_gpt":0.3550400299084867,"score_spread":0.21866763922344973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110691199","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051160073,0.0039552143,0.02332236,0.94222516,0.0024375562,0.0000293919,0.00005581902,0.00005393371,0.022804512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5302188,0.02274354,0.07672101,0.33214715,0.009422464,0.00041284435,0.00011418533,0.0002748532,0.027945159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935881,0.0041406523,0.00019667695,0.00043239375,0.0011733812,0.00046877295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.973631,0.016882041,0.0013490462,0.0010244851,0.003884145,0.0032293247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016517244,0.00096764165,0.0016968343,0.002546001,0.0028469707,0.009082565,0.0012917559,0.009588713,0.0071304026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04505739,0.00074110815,0.0006999736,0.0015987814,0.014598326,0.014610142,0.0027952977,0.012583841,0.0026033004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008106848,0.0005028338,0.0043558204,0.0002913467,0.00018073934,0.00016561298,0.0012686917,0.0019561658,0.0002670767,0.84985477,0.08791322,0.05316271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003317339,0.000012394229,0.00055118726,0.00012807576,0.000019163852,0.000032056032,0.0007435315,0.0011549365,0.00008930971,0.9704414,0.026774563,0.000020159072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039349343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003982495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016517244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035362612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004586543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087352514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111046244","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12287","title":"THE EVOLUTIONARY LOGIC OF HONORING SUNK COSTS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sunk costs; Cognitive dissonance; Economics; Phenomenon; Function (biology); Positive economics; Microeconomics; Neoclassical economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.3533139611296619,"score_gpt":0.4440464302118628,"score_spread":0.0907324690822009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111046244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38625467,0.0017897799,0.168448,0.027116481,0.0005240524,0.0001149125,0.0001971079,0.00012083418,0.41543412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880074,0.00027767362,0.005790279,0.0005348048,0.0000849287,0.00003181023,0.000015352774,0.0000145716895,0.0052431854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982476,0.00081187364,0.00006396831,0.00031059288,0.0003589565,0.00020705641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962135,0.0017486623,0.00075875234,0.00049196254,0.00037377368,0.00041332116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002703929,0.00038417176,0.00036071916,0.0007688434,0.001283275,0.0041234028,0.0009021084,0.002539609,0.008462058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010422129,0.00020497874,0.00037795122,0.0006429563,0.007933914,0.004130954,0.0019483838,0.0028396824,0.00041504944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004058265,0.000019047624,0.0011693708,0.00004116379,0.000022287648,0.0001197412,0.00023712263,0.003877226,0.00051335996,0.98335016,0.0008395599,0.009770468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019769506,0.000025608173,0.0021911627,0.00003252218,0.000014547872,0.00019756964,0.0002550611,0.0067947484,0.00025236886,0.98446596,0.0057282564,0.00002253416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008933163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090004393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008462058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024520468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090614124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028308451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111552019","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x07001835","title":"Nested sets theory, full stop: Explaining performance on Bayesian inference tasks without dual-systems assumptions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Inference; Bayesian inference; Computer science; Core (optical fiber); Bayesian probability; Series (stratigraphy); Artificial intelligence; Econometrics; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.19633574027412745,"score_gpt":0.44454411877298433,"score_spread":0.24820837849885688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111552019","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35781813,0.00047868633,0.6281467,0.0017025176,0.00008479756,0.00022136647,0.00039245948,0.00062707195,0.0105282925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94684184,0.00012412359,0.050959732,0.00013212157,0.000041824427,0.00012119093,0.00020339024,0.000090968424,0.001484778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966667,0.0017835954,0.00017269238,0.0005883963,0.000556731,0.00023194328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9424285,0.04723354,0.0039401264,0.0036135362,0.0015034942,0.00128075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008698127,0.00097358326,0.0015187835,0.0012546255,0.0005567385,0.0028627708,0.0021134717,0.001347239,0.0065456214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.083771236,0.0011319267,0.001607195,0.0007545843,0.0027724246,0.0052501136,0.0021948686,0.002296231,0.001035321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024323002,0.0011521352,0.07789103,0.0006498337,0.0008783856,0.0004467185,0.0037115924,0.30963534,0.00606897,0.44985852,0.006120721,0.14115451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000617884,0.0001458223,0.008507838,0.000026910539,0.000043318214,0.00006654403,0.00007087157,0.6318194,0.000590857,0.3582164,0.0003969638,0.00005329451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007793763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035373247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008698127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001541294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013076855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0460006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112678505","doi":"10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb01415.x","title":"The Empathy‐Prospect Model and the Choice to Help<sup>1</sup>","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Prosocial behavior; Feeling; Psychology; Perception; Social psychology; Altruism (biology); Helping behavior; Cognition","score_opus":0.11608720858065628,"score_gpt":0.43788287877377774,"score_spread":0.32179567019312144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112678505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54844564,0.002687568,0.16426383,0.017874567,0.00018898476,0.0001818175,0.00031067972,0.0000742252,0.26597267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98462045,0.00052021525,0.008527646,0.00036929705,0.000049945782,0.000075473945,0.00005626078,0.0000065506238,0.005774104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913365,0.00054693356,0.000017344628,0.0000597571,0.00012345701,0.00011877774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673766,0.0022168097,0.00046778936,0.000119383985,0.00015832666,0.0003000552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015535665,0.00044715748,0.00023501278,0.00035892322,0.00044169754,0.0015242964,0.000448537,0.0012140776,0.009487545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007086477,0.00025529714,0.000468556,0.00028548937,0.0013574401,0.002428524,0.0009259259,0.0017324243,0.0010850606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049431983,0.00024464141,0.013556705,0.00013076181,0.00006049372,0.00065100676,0.0023266792,0.016068354,0.000932613,0.9205624,0.004523526,0.040448576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073629846,0.00022004968,0.014213975,0.00006808803,0.000047460184,0.0006965681,0.0010722483,0.054154474,0.00037123347,0.9193145,0.00972443,0.000043262924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081581634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008517121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009487545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000889712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006351879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031738997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112727590","doi":"10.1002/bdm.513","title":"Illusion of confirmation from exposure to another's hypothesis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Confidence interval; Point (geometry); Illusion; Psychology; Econometrics; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.11590702150322214,"score_gpt":0.389568273463285,"score_spread":0.27366125196006286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112727590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909298,0.000165977,0.004279897,0.0005056537,0.000029080895,0.000022652737,0.000026398655,0.00004961104,0.003991093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983015,0.000060046063,0.0011938415,0.00017060486,0.00001489444,0.000009617857,0.000020043672,0.000008736813,0.00022072205],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942531,0.0025179654,0.00031689878,0.0006338129,0.0020141958,0.0002639614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89090997,0.0777467,0.016178235,0.010669743,0.0023517127,0.0021435653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007072868,0.0004044622,0.0003986379,0.00059878005,0.00047438557,0.001858579,0.0005400067,0.0013611744,0.0033868367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07993371,0.0004004536,0.00045669035,0.00023775813,0.0033302533,0.001943174,0.0023457687,0.0032074265,0.0002195697],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023371525,0.001998243,0.21579263,0.0010961186,0.0008013018,0.0028652076,0.04650405,0.0051892474,0.51244575,0.031365518,0.0018911399,0.15667926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008502815,0.011621124,0.7529929,0.00049026666,0.00097385,0.0056742174,0.0103300745,0.023502925,0.13708062,0.04624569,0.009698262,0.0005396776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007436923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036317852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007072868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005945105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041967133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037405312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113250844","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2007.01.001","title":"Violations of coherence in subjective probability: A representational and assessment processes account","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Pessimism; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Probability estimation; Social psychology; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.19095526049685368,"score_gpt":0.4616539005071716,"score_spread":0.2706986400103179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113250844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5644183,0.00057769776,0.40202272,0.006354906,0.00011312499,0.000079967096,0.00020241413,0.00018976153,0.02604111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99026513,0.00005459976,0.009175177,0.00009050821,0.000044900247,0.000023789373,0.000041905587,0.000023051361,0.00028100764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935523,0.0028502594,0.0004491483,0.0008121233,0.0018235494,0.00051260606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9303496,0.046902597,0.007545395,0.009631647,0.0041180435,0.0014526559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008952649,0.00043836012,0.0007475723,0.001378159,0.0009825105,0.0054025375,0.001445137,0.0020897256,0.004122586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.083190836,0.0008587292,0.00077969744,0.0013652185,0.0045382227,0.0121051,0.0033374524,0.0031407527,0.00024782642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046279485,0.00022161898,0.01512481,0.00014570057,0.00025508457,0.00029735363,0.002800032,0.011565647,0.005919649,0.9193342,0.0011227533,0.042750448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047458976,0.00005893581,0.012187178,0.000017515584,0.000047788842,0.000107297084,0.00024787785,0.039659403,0.000923106,0.9462112,0.0004518201,0.000040533116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019940834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012983629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008952649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009643969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010540576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04734671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113496801","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2638669","title":"Measuring Economic Inequality and Risk: A Unifying Approach Based on Personal Gambles, Societal Preferences and References","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Economic inequality; Economics; Econometrics; Actuarial science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2664098658438554,"score_gpt":0.3701803614205095,"score_spread":0.10377049557665408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113496801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68400264,0.002039008,0.24008104,0.0021447763,0.00017914551,0.00038690987,0.0015932805,0.0001685303,0.06940477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95176613,0.00038082275,0.04561013,0.000052636497,0.000023548155,0.0001860807,0.00026305605,0.000016979,0.0017005196],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956084,0.002408722,0.0002606217,0.00030355144,0.0011817352,0.00023691909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910574,0.005499681,0.0011347026,0.00074826117,0.0012189293,0.00034111465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00466586,0.00055111985,0.00064089184,0.0045744176,0.0009384003,0.0030884922,0.00073162955,0.0009651001,0.005069665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034718297,0.00022891183,0.00079049246,0.003504854,0.0011010639,0.0028325,0.002882147,0.0011215899,0.00036286464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003781475,0.00050666626,0.35355583,0.00032342726,0.00046900727,0.00025896518,0.0045839623,0.020088976,0.0013955871,0.28774697,0.0026888512,0.32800353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024629477,0.00036651597,0.29129907,0.0007024196,0.0003676632,0.0005118205,0.005436488,0.08608473,0.003628761,0.59842885,0.012957879,0.0001911281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026114513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003892071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005069665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010907566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089702266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024675727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113560343","doi":"10.1080/00048402.2010.510529","title":"Representation Theorems and the Foundations of Decision Theory","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Rationality; Decision theory; Probabilistic logic; Mathematical economics; Epistemology; Expected utility hypothesis; Subjective expected utility; Representation theorem; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Discrete mathematics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0836085933280365,"score_gpt":0.40021478422964296,"score_spread":0.31660619090160647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113560343","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013066692,0.017976636,0.8338594,0.022392275,0.00075456325,0.00009196381,0.000399361,0.00030989444,0.11114916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7099054,0.014848272,0.2558709,0.0036115558,0.0027871197,0.0005444494,0.0006474424,0.00015882746,0.011626114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906136,0.0055925003,0.00056968036,0.0009793973,0.0016776221,0.000567211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97427917,0.02076118,0.0009866292,0.0018764618,0.0017078309,0.00038867583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012632489,0.0012655269,0.0016005787,0.0028838343,0.0016918033,0.007718157,0.0024835179,0.0030157021,0.005231062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023125075,0.0005896397,0.001999751,0.0028119427,0.017325949,0.011322371,0.0029279245,0.0065230955,0.0012859623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033025924,0.0000040154832,0.000025763418,0.00002904119,0.0000060591747,0.00000963912,0.000053500826,0.000961675,0.00001780853,0.9960939,0.00048240946,0.0023128542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034873622,0.0000025322947,0.00001300404,0.000014353804,0.0000014774351,0.000006975546,0.000009525162,0.0013767265,0.0000144645055,0.9969771,0.0015778972,0.0000024300432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021040828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008401741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012632489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057550627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026696105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06680781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114216861","doi":"10.3982/te1004","title":"Scale-invariant uncertainty-averse preferences and source-dependent constant relative risk aversion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity aversion; Axiom; Expected utility hypothesis; Ambiguity; Mathematical economics; Roulette; Risk aversion (psychology); Econometrics; Mathematics; Axiom independence; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Invariant (physics); Independence (probability theory); Economics; Statistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03511651380158333,"score_gpt":0.29478637426369403,"score_spread":0.2596698604621107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114216861","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05853609,0.00030921397,0.88223535,0.0012124795,0.00007572565,0.000052549905,0.00038790965,0.000073735726,0.057116937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8700279,0.00072739896,0.111348756,0.00027702498,0.000135131,0.00013179981,0.00026624344,0.00004430262,0.01704146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923766,0.00028739407,0.000042801934,0.00012446722,0.00021782974,0.00008985854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979842,0.0011444965,0.00028690192,0.0002915656,0.00019336648,0.00009952296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015826909,0.00049204,0.00042049948,0.0004648963,0.00030346224,0.0013003629,0.000873505,0.0006708532,0.007762372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006667147,0.0002544328,0.00080921245,0.00071906514,0.0016032334,0.0024925536,0.0010579968,0.0020245383,0.00057104975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066485045,0.000010529886,0.00017576676,0.00001646445,0.0000060261373,0.000037885235,0.000058801263,0.005011345,0.00047245735,0.98853743,0.0005499129,0.00511681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051195775,0.000020620235,0.00057940267,0.000009945604,0.0000051986226,0.00009299565,0.00003497479,0.035862144,0.0003336847,0.9603776,0.0026658191,0.000012636081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012366199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010052884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007762372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007297182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047352267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025967717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114305661","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x0700266x","title":"Differential focus in causal and counterfactual thinking: Different possibilities or different functions?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Focus (optics); Psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Regulatory focus theory; Causal model; Counterfactual conditional; Cognition; Dissociation (chemistry); Social psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1656313752524876,"score_gpt":0.41395941221895094,"score_spread":0.24832803696646333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114305661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43590188,0.115835905,0.24509038,0.02668775,0.00068851816,0.000084294756,0.00034257062,0.00032995082,0.17503878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816922,0.007510585,0.008569098,0.000677309,0.0001633784,0.00003909443,0.00005973248,0.000030153908,0.0012583766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979964,0.0007812499,0.00011867671,0.00031399284,0.0006478463,0.00014176947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906991,0.0067382334,0.0007625089,0.0006969637,0.0008881533,0.0002150868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051712645,0.00037437835,0.0011029473,0.0017233703,0.00042066103,0.004169357,0.0012941067,0.0015579727,0.0042287954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011811056,0.00037133516,0.00067289063,0.0013450832,0.007994054,0.008267206,0.0017186113,0.0012701524,0.0005185933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041621062,0.000060828264,0.0032025496,0.0010871215,0.00017019849,0.00027245225,0.0029786506,0.0009076764,0.0053296224,0.91131985,0.00092797744,0.07332684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000691751,0.00006852937,0.008564404,0.0002650301,0.00010675149,0.00050095754,0.0014194736,0.0029623783,0.0038680013,0.97265494,0.00946862,0.000051773306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071654335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036674232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051712645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012025039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006550252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027348638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114531238","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.02.002","title":"Self-selection bias in hypothesis comparison","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Selection (genetic algorithm); Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Statistical hypothesis testing; Probabilistic logic; Social psychology; Confirmation bias; Cognitive bias; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.17833366672650422,"score_gpt":0.40100230785089935,"score_spread":0.22266864112439513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114531238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.762849,0.0049468963,0.19187142,0.0074151247,0.0042051086,0.0014306806,0.0004669563,0.0003822423,0.026432633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97762716,0.00018646749,0.017876534,0.0017940929,0.0006410985,0.00047561995,0.00015609537,0.000087924396,0.0011550575],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.81729436,0.1476564,0.008609882,0.012059419,0.0126176,0.0017624175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.29062122,0.66016763,0.0121785095,0.027500175,0.0073807994,0.0021516879],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20843321,0.00065982866,0.0019534447,0.0030971738,0.0017464769,0.0035341561,0.002303621,0.002526137,0.01153615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45149726,0.0005027106,0.0022590258,0.0016407171,0.004893598,0.0040746788,0.0028427108,0.0034307612,0.00067175715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017639888,0.002173211,0.3542535,0.0031141657,0.018397508,0.0026585239,0.006877942,0.007101064,0.010291525,0.19728182,0.015985183,0.36422566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044865627,0.004158476,0.22435732,0.0008563964,0.006281935,0.0041545434,0.0035670863,0.075291134,0.022982225,0.63347965,0.020087117,0.00029753047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042925062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061045616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7915668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010983229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014075219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97614276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114806482","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.461","title":"Aspects of endowment: A query theory of value construction.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Endowment effect; Order (exchange); Endowment; Value (mathematics); Loss aversion; Economics; Prospect theory; Microeconomics; Construct (python library); Object (grammar); Weighting; Computer science; Mathematics; Finance; Statistics","score_opus":0.08478900968525906,"score_gpt":0.41962833663782756,"score_spread":0.3348393269525685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114806482","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16575308,0.009088992,0.68689555,0.016835313,0.0002998568,0.00032227777,0.0007510296,0.00030103142,0.119752884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92372835,0.0018851206,0.06806952,0.0010693715,0.00025058317,0.00027825014,0.0003203376,0.00007772127,0.0043207197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810445,0.00087296177,0.00014046252,0.00037294475,0.0003890746,0.00012003998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904615,0.0060932394,0.0009638993,0.0013668849,0.00075338077,0.0003610285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003544507,0.0007091776,0.0006421773,0.0022739451,0.00086899387,0.0049589286,0.0014561081,0.0017909664,0.0068467953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020519106,0.0006233871,0.0013789212,0.0023671754,0.005862439,0.018277377,0.002330905,0.0017644302,0.00086706225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020642526,0.00006176313,0.00472993,0.00014442229,0.00006983619,0.00012226688,0.0031030956,0.001472455,0.0012685532,0.94902086,0.0015679711,0.038232435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032491665,0.000050505718,0.0028322968,0.00003553138,0.000032733384,0.00019540844,0.00042304458,0.010074491,0.00039301364,0.98158747,0.004323864,0.00001907929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013364945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005481497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068467953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016638562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005014739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022904754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115168001","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.624221","title":"Subjective Recursive Expected Utility","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Mathematics; Econometrics; Psychology","score_opus":0.06567386177020151,"score_gpt":0.37031190815135184,"score_spread":0.30463804638115033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115168001","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12763494,0.0007222082,0.8195552,0.0018800484,0.00009279303,0.00007480873,0.0005461481,0.00036218343,0.049131706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9409403,0.0005615875,0.03203928,0.00014957589,0.00008995458,0.00007669658,0.00037845646,0.0000835118,0.02568072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992268,0.0003671831,0.000032585496,0.00014904316,0.0001355434,0.00008876387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99483526,0.0035866972,0.00031431837,0.00059815013,0.00048444248,0.00018111861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017258248,0.0005251422,0.0007383898,0.0005842923,0.00029315922,0.0025046803,0.0007397587,0.0010084853,0.012809626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015567759,0.00028672203,0.00065033074,0.0006902267,0.00078487943,0.003408403,0.0007555579,0.0012596648,0.0013938288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003750151,0.00004720379,0.0019087852,0.000048452683,0.000042934804,0.00009860847,0.00020744787,0.024117935,0.0004035974,0.94200796,0.0023352054,0.028744359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011985284,0.000029233084,0.0017670927,0.000019546127,0.000025665446,0.00010776865,0.000056395238,0.17963815,0.000312029,0.81508416,0.002929144,0.000018795981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010497665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008808987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012809626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095586665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056815415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04285252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115836035","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00567.x","title":"It's worse than you thought: The feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychophysiology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":523,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Psychology; Negativity effect; Task (project management); Outcome (game theory); Reinforcement; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12466451589500914,"score_gpt":0.42014955670084964,"score_spread":0.2954850408058405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115836035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99733174,0.00011820258,0.0005633427,0.00028658973,0.000028596898,0.000009662924,0.000040591163,0.000009755731,0.0016114739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988821,0.00006754334,0.0004707119,0.00021619824,0.000014932381,0.000012143494,0.000027946304,0.000011720246,0.0002967647],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996481,0.00012625844,0.000022583607,0.00006308297,0.00011236107,0.000027551654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958056,0.0024957883,0.0011167664,0.00019896186,0.00018093099,0.0002019103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010894104,0.00022618256,0.0002175353,0.00023450804,0.00019165997,0.00047773132,0.00016168342,0.0005507121,0.0014727322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014723494,0.00021246476,0.00007760216,0.00015049995,0.0005422976,0.00039457507,0.0003941106,0.00069018814,0.00014095538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008844693,0.0011591394,0.24804309,0.00040022054,0.00020552018,0.0012933786,0.004800989,0.0011495345,0.6345522,0.0023181825,0.0023737,0.094859354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010418279,0.00056849315,0.98180974,0.000029646228,0.000044343775,0.001244479,0.0005431877,0.0018039711,0.008442663,0.004774041,0.00059829967,0.00003702306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006703591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007012212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0014727322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000156755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013495673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005761385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115857808","doi":"10.1037/a0030174","title":"Risk preferences and aging: The “certainty effect” in older adults' decision making.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychology and Aging","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Certainty; Risk-seeking; Loss aversion; Risk aversion (psychology); Psychology; Prospect theory; Stereotype threat; Health and Retirement Study; Demography; Social psychology; Gerontology; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics; Medicine; Microeconomics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.05324072154479669,"score_gpt":0.4166853287893815,"score_spread":0.3634446072445848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115857808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904585,0.0021094834,0.0018351802,0.0006278345,0.000030753097,0.000013618913,0.00008202156,0.0000073071765,0.004835222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982326,0.00043258187,0.0007642973,0.00016167363,0.000021472708,0.000007030046,0.000038586793,0.0000021598717,0.00033966292],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938214,0.00023316016,0.000046787543,0.00011371666,0.00018729498,0.00003687814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99369216,0.0029991951,0.0020483106,0.0004095877,0.00032359626,0.0005270442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029209128,0.00027312417,0.0002727505,0.00039236012,0.0001963449,0.00078424247,0.00015807452,0.00060044136,0.0021586337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01353311,0.00022312345,0.00034575304,0.00020696523,0.0007011981,0.001093297,0.0007549497,0.00085290463,0.00013890064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003142209,0.0008923593,0.820959,0.00039684458,0.00060634327,0.00053228857,0.0059051258,0.0014508803,0.020405296,0.010994117,0.0014244604,0.13329121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044683846,0.0007997186,0.9799985,0.000061050596,0.00015550556,0.0004974951,0.0006736213,0.0016122616,0.0012637227,0.013280176,0.0015701432,0.000043050793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007873391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015637031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029209128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023253137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001873737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015447438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115917877","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00901","title":"Reason and less","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Rationality; Psychology; White (mutation); Voting; Presidential system; Population; Politics; Bounded rationality; Positive economics; Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.10416157246143126,"score_gpt":0.42068676993338167,"score_spread":0.3165251974719504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115917877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02383641,0.025955163,0.06423625,0.1654054,0.002246037,0.00009873264,0.00028833564,0.00024704295,0.71768665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8353905,0.011539755,0.021030558,0.031252682,0.0020077582,0.00019394605,0.00041135156,0.00025332344,0.0979201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948879,0.0024085895,0.00020424559,0.0011950356,0.00088826823,0.00041595584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99346113,0.0028500033,0.00058205967,0.0018267708,0.0007734042,0.00050662033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065107616,0.0006179367,0.0007084369,0.0010980264,0.0026632864,0.007493769,0.0013214872,0.0038336325,0.020149302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011202614,0.00026916692,0.00067769235,0.0007875668,0.033838205,0.01330822,0.0040310705,0.0046545975,0.0026996867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013561746,0.000011349237,0.000283004,0.00005660339,0.000013075568,0.000031378477,0.0012696858,0.00016445693,0.00008200711,0.9854811,0.005137123,0.007456642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010662619,0.000014742353,0.0003016002,0.00011645596,0.000011059659,0.00008295338,0.0008061597,0.00022788972,0.00012043914,0.8468088,0.15148824,0.000011028273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031877204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018965933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020149302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034905872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031251947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06740612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118335134","doi":"10.1007/s10797-006-6665-4","title":"Estimates of Own Lethal Risks and Anchoring Effects","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Anchoring; Cohort; Population; Psychology; Cohort effect; Actuarial science; Demography; Social psychology; Economics; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.06492304748172943,"score_gpt":0.3714043440293516,"score_spread":0.30648129654762213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118335134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76412237,0.0010762145,0.21174191,0.0003431582,0.000061342755,0.00003092053,0.00041758906,0.00021470085,0.021991909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870884,0.0002090094,0.011308849,0.000022939754,0.000015380298,0.000010230841,0.00013527815,0.000029611092,0.0011802295],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986285,0.00056076795,0.00007085348,0.00027215623,0.00037586867,0.00009194892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649827,0.027166478,0.0021380172,0.0041196225,0.0012855947,0.00030752012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005334062,0.00060181244,0.000664561,0.0015796248,0.0002817328,0.0023662555,0.0007209253,0.0009313697,0.0041457377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041089367,0.00039180025,0.0007367739,0.0007315051,0.0011222584,0.0034330476,0.0017409174,0.0011645567,0.00049811526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017260285,0.0002471025,0.13948478,0.00034950246,0.0012336277,0.00044254353,0.0014542902,0.41859046,0.01889679,0.21596764,0.0019305925,0.1996766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009951409,0.0007459675,0.15713616,0.00016746233,0.00085687294,0.0009427427,0.00088157074,0.4524786,0.03668255,0.34565234,0.0040473286,0.00030894118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007996038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007667014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005334062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005174288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028035688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028209567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118465430","doi":"10.1002/0471264385.wei0423","title":"Reasoning and Problem Solving","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Handbook of Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Frame problem; Adaptive reasoning; Task (project management); Frame (networking); Action (physics); Cognitive science; Computer science; Connectionism; Qualitative reasoning; Psychology of reasoning; Process (computing); Analytic reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Model-based reasoning; Selection (genetic algorithm); Reasoning system; Multitude; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Epistemology; Management science; Psychology; Artificial neural network","score_opus":0.10651294004741624,"score_gpt":0.4301755355521594,"score_spread":0.3236625955047432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118465430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017656626,0.03562401,0.33894467,0.04745397,0.0011320062,0.00037303084,0.00047300864,0.0006291742,0.55771345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52910465,0.03986106,0.3523578,0.009473282,0.0012868858,0.00069934945,0.001722924,0.00033013735,0.065163806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99332374,0.0035534343,0.0004434054,0.0010426588,0.001363772,0.0002729498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99241567,0.0045623737,0.00058118,0.00125253,0.00085376855,0.0003343245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00467659,0.0009178875,0.0008208726,0.0017039347,0.0013611964,0.009100246,0.002016595,0.0027734307,0.01673068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013707142,0.00038379306,0.0013005573,0.0021977425,0.011553362,0.008359667,0.0032811472,0.0041997246,0.003122501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021269705,0.000047647354,0.0005502954,0.00029577847,0.00003501208,0.000081346145,0.0011569555,0.0021271582,0.00020449971,0.9332923,0.008606237,0.053581405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011626301,0.000010608829,0.00025067886,0.00026412026,0.000010883698,0.00009320163,0.0003689639,0.0025392484,0.00022117374,0.9223308,0.07388822,0.000010499803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029093786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016574828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01673068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032865254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043549677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055969656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121642162","doi":"10.1521/soco.2015.33.2.104","title":"When Mona Lisa Smiled and Love was in the Air: On the Cognitive Energetics of Motivated Judgments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Task (project management); Wishful thinking; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive bias; Social psychology; Cognitive resource theory","score_opus":0.25258708067792485,"score_gpt":0.3935508150183149,"score_spread":0.14096373434039006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121642162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98837155,0.00019007003,0.0009274964,0.00042528604,0.000027433938,0.000019832818,0.000032040105,0.000012046605,0.009994233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983896,0.000074932526,0.00076615927,0.00017240738,0.000012715462,0.000013397661,0.00002514715,0.00001316366,0.0005325051],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778533,0.0013129724,0.000074340554,0.00022268703,0.00042820277,0.00017643266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794789,0.014594657,0.0032163456,0.00097187713,0.00070474594,0.0010334613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038656932,0.00026920543,0.0003921672,0.00056333805,0.0011842111,0.0032522378,0.00030075942,0.0013449168,0.0037797075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03169185,0.00030424757,0.00027443818,0.00034956806,0.0015794721,0.0016009072,0.0011519673,0.0012766819,0.00033285771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.021879537,0.0044173775,0.5687962,0.0012986955,0.0010753602,0.0032639594,0.03790115,0.006120698,0.13054667,0.059549466,0.005931405,0.15921946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021659056,0.001518659,0.88888353,0.00014983102,0.0002672586,0.000794081,0.018593522,0.01116587,0.011548275,0.05689837,0.009638235,0.00032580455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017642876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003470313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038656932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007664505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040298837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020443976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122152276","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2011.06.015","title":"Nonmanipulable Bayesian testing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Contrast (vision); Probabilistic logic; Bayesian probability; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Test (biology); Machine learning; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.338175378747531,"score_gpt":0.3873039713669915,"score_spread":0.04912859261946051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122152276","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066545,0.0005370073,0.9174466,0.0034999095,0.00018378849,0.00022919138,0.00040239937,0.0007269021,0.010429232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7948727,0.0005198765,0.19442008,0.0008977825,0.00042395326,0.00040132314,0.00059252634,0.00022665111,0.007645075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97699434,0.01539956,0.0010693604,0.0029088086,0.002734653,0.000893243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6563873,0.30436364,0.0077060075,0.023032703,0.006717025,0.0017931995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03900362,0.0018124102,0.0033713821,0.0023289043,0.0016899029,0.0052685738,0.00576235,0.004391152,0.01567914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2958464,0.001657437,0.0019194101,0.0023933267,0.0050207474,0.016016735,0.0047990303,0.005274945,0.0016362338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014173099,0.00043823238,0.007749578,0.0003239475,0.0004399616,0.00094975124,0.00051005033,0.052542344,0.0008883982,0.7805431,0.006193821,0.14800352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008180924,0.00003981455,0.00047458464,0.000043395343,0.000039653125,0.00015400545,0.000033416032,0.13937186,0.0005004087,0.8585031,0.0007349649,0.000022936625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001601434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016974185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03900362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016932599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003286066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20627338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122638098","doi":"10.1901/jeab.2009.92-1","title":"PROBABILITY DISCOUNTING OF GAINS AND LOSSES: IMPLICATIONS FOR RISK ATTITUDES AND IMPULSIVITY","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Impulsivity; Delay discounting; Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Lottery; Econometrics; Social psychology; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics; Developmental psychology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.14131423609438767,"score_gpt":0.45455641499429633,"score_spread":0.3132421788999087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122638098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994041,0.000041336865,0.00031614423,0.00002251533,0.0000017606264,0.0000074540694,0.000012022591,0.0000017536537,0.00019282615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994437,0.00004288554,0.00033514365,0.00001665793,0.0000048141715,0.000007824977,0.000024265224,0.0000018142754,0.00012285302],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917334,0.00028463796,0.000113529844,0.00013666146,0.00021436601,0.00007740033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836956,0.009245442,0.0040079122,0.0011766553,0.0006654604,0.0012088633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033854675,0.00037980216,0.00037777025,0.0007786171,0.00019846577,0.0012909116,0.0003225275,0.0003573273,0.001391282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024025567,0.00037566235,0.00038580847,0.000540164,0.0007226559,0.0006798853,0.00080276415,0.0011072546,0.00012644552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002465685,0.0009102525,0.9601045,0.000049829418,0.0001432218,0.00012281771,0.0020013645,0.0010176311,0.00661238,0.00065869716,0.000052139567,0.02586141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005937273,0.00050940673,0.99020046,0.000012114826,0.00008058498,0.00015988942,0.00044789162,0.0043941867,0.0013497769,0.002600044,0.00016024463,0.000026108648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019552184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017933344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033854675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004075034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028040554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017904282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123099414","doi":"10.3758/s13421-012-0268-3","title":"Probability matching in risky choice: The interplay of feedback and strategy availability","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Outcome (game theory); Task (project management); Psychology; Identification (biology); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Microeconomics; Statistics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13777961351072648,"score_gpt":0.39391203129597024,"score_spread":0.25613241778524376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123099414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9466486,0.000650291,0.044840787,0.0014538327,0.000066133805,0.000031572363,0.00008620203,0.00007890678,0.006143725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972722,0.00013337989,0.0019389142,0.00005385993,0.000034882665,0.000008955645,0.00001831164,0.000015340114,0.0005242657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822026,0.00091371883,0.00010432821,0.0003015994,0.00021795626,0.00024199918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9435922,0.047503848,0.0037142774,0.0020630523,0.001280304,0.001846376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055948757,0.00038274573,0.0011531997,0.0007258834,0.00051777466,0.0035720312,0.0010226142,0.0019791743,0.006844607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06361531,0.00088027696,0.0005620811,0.0005748585,0.0013515332,0.005164614,0.0015221671,0.0020126577,0.00046671394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007198785,0.0032737637,0.1261672,0.0009009903,0.0010158117,0.0013741107,0.0022511152,0.24046794,0.051221125,0.32356963,0.0043154894,0.2382441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038431212,0.0005611057,0.072242714,0.000050582992,0.00025260847,0.00033132147,0.00025489097,0.38195455,0.0032516439,0.5399198,0.0006556454,0.00014077053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017430112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014046838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006844607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007408031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009232576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029588878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124287106","doi":"10.1027/1618-3169.56.2.112","title":"An Inverse Belief–Bias Effect","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Modus ponens; Premises; Inference; Rule of inference; Psychology; Causal inference; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Econometrics; Law","score_opus":0.1725170874408676,"score_gpt":0.5215509119877515,"score_spread":0.3490338245468839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124287106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92811614,0.0023973559,0.010996259,0.0019021124,0.00017520675,0.00020313563,0.00030642276,0.00018964954,0.05571371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940071,0.0002543988,0.0028335492,0.0005144351,0.000083326726,0.0000409646,0.00012482963,0.000056053785,0.0020853828],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619675,0.0011956258,0.00033272617,0.0010285807,0.0010562045,0.000190158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88534915,0.09549133,0.007649514,0.0074254284,0.0025437817,0.0015408316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008995022,0.00046978748,0.0006092974,0.0010139777,0.0003781767,0.0011153389,0.0007195189,0.0014888005,0.022171034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08224308,0.0004395112,0.00055886066,0.00044331542,0.0014087927,0.0019343052,0.0012656599,0.0024744445,0.0014341022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025462452,0.0045299507,0.43407357,0.0023455857,0.0017519165,0.0018398708,0.00915926,0.0017476105,0.1181206,0.0757608,0.0036459526,0.3215624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022211303,0.0026691514,0.8501741,0.00025110337,0.0014540103,0.0063923392,0.0010654611,0.00550944,0.02341523,0.09109786,0.015569076,0.00018100203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008447937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043050374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022171034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048465986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041373438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07416946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126221177","doi":"10.1080/14622200412331320743","title":"The near-universal experience of regret among smokers in four countries: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":228,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Cancer Council Victoria; University of Illinois at Chicago; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention","keywords":"Regret; Tobacco control; Smoking cessation; Cohort; Survey data collection; Medicine; Psychology; Environmental health; Demography; Public health","score_opus":0.25058390600835545,"score_gpt":0.4783369772387701,"score_spread":0.22775307123041466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126221177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99795985,0.00029118283,0.00007774661,0.00046207587,0.00000647927,0.0000170792,0.0004930208,0.0000020063362,0.0006905473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989304,0.00022227407,0.00006622958,0.000192393,0.0000065762915,0.000017754703,0.0004521928,0.0000016295808,0.000110662535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997186,0.001623867,0.00025830744,0.00015053424,0.0003707603,0.00041044832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98938555,0.002957113,0.005022856,0.0006159363,0.0010799716,0.0009385406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005133395,0.00014094033,0.00037801338,0.0008767341,0.0006189897,0.0009867464,0.00038519746,0.00060748274,0.0005364182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015029261,0.0002611181,0.000482538,0.0015557692,0.0006585289,0.00076138385,0.0016616478,0.0011180755,0.00009006422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008652374,0.00003951068,0.9917671,0.00002799123,0.000052873456,0.000054524324,0.0026557315,0.00008941855,0.000039435916,0.00006124923,0.0005653477,0.0045602135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002940761,0.00003897911,0.99643505,0.000025110774,0.00001397917,0.000049655602,0.002813647,0.0000911081,0.000024682928,0.000023728873,0.00047349615,0.0000076516235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02323346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033084583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02323346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006245078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006052687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04619646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126496917","doi":"10.1257/aer.101.2.724","title":"Procedural Analysis of Choice Rules with Applications to Bounded Rationality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Satisficing; Bounded rationality; Maximization; Rationality; Economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Framing (construction); Framing effect; Utility maximization; Automaton; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.18135908695859318,"score_gpt":0.43494911405233255,"score_spread":0.25359002709373935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126496917","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11220455,0.00042247795,0.861172,0.0015129633,0.000042273125,0.00014699645,0.00011506961,0.00010415391,0.024279473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87038964,0.00042668532,0.1247771,0.00017876101,0.00006791438,0.00031254173,0.00012366129,0.000044746717,0.0036788804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958931,0.002567543,0.00022689246,0.00046785257,0.00061350176,0.00023100173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9435037,0.046563514,0.0040350333,0.0035567284,0.0018382458,0.0005028279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058076535,0.00053385337,0.0007894051,0.0010697693,0.0007209339,0.00277855,0.0014247233,0.0011439463,0.006321055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047345705,0.00040439784,0.0014770349,0.0011443812,0.003969833,0.003622047,0.0014759914,0.0023850685,0.00042676483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039231836,0.00006109005,0.0011091325,0.00006448348,0.000048762267,0.00005170085,0.00030088625,0.05912655,0.00061734323,0.9257779,0.00031715812,0.012485789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000135273385,0.000020038722,0.00040200975,0.000010439996,0.00001506412,0.000014831448,0.00003507895,0.14607778,0.00028503686,0.8522565,0.00086206646,0.000007655953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017733241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011003735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006321055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019240625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013108117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030714154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128221441","doi":"10.1177/1088868314530517","title":"Decision-Making Under Risk","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":238,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Prospect theory; Situational ethics; Management science; Causal decision theory; Decision theory; Empirical research; Psychology; Expected utility hypothesis; Heuristic; Social psychology; Decision engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Business decision mapping; Computer science; Epistemology; Decision support system; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.22179285854040645,"score_gpt":0.5086566347586318,"score_spread":0.28686377621822534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128221441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38320917,0.02452464,0.24484423,0.04953851,0.0013561697,0.0005851865,0.0005730419,0.00021058631,0.29515848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95464903,0.009139523,0.02574858,0.0033254204,0.00029411283,0.00016461912,0.00023638109,0.00003710321,0.006405332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953035,0.0026424234,0.00024051509,0.00058499596,0.0007835546,0.00044506672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933802,0.0033716315,0.0011001541,0.0005514782,0.0007176715,0.00087891164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005411695,0.0004941739,0.0007773371,0.00066152407,0.0010060195,0.0049167424,0.0008201669,0.001985474,0.0064247083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019800825,0.00020128879,0.00086844305,0.00053102075,0.0038362462,0.0027238852,0.0022276838,0.0026665486,0.0010122914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032098687,0.00029751478,0.028541993,0.0008227968,0.00059048494,0.00094891636,0.0040691504,0.015234781,0.0032022998,0.7425688,0.013564331,0.18983787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003349705,0.00021923355,0.01114258,0.00050482585,0.00011440732,0.0007375588,0.0019922883,0.009355834,0.0010472783,0.9338564,0.04092243,0.00007366966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083124416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084464764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064247083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012225314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002064081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028620124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128582813","doi":"10.1506/ckx0-8fbf-9ngf-ccrq","title":"Undetected Deviations in Tests of Controls: Experimental Evidence of Nonsampling Risk*","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Accounting Perspectives","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Audit; Accounting; Payment; Ceiling (cloud); Audit substantive test; Control (management); Speculation; Econometrics; Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Finance; Political science; Internal audit; External auditor; Engineering","score_opus":0.13124267411517063,"score_gpt":0.4117447231844899,"score_spread":0.2805020490693193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128582813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970028,0.000032004813,0.001830014,0.00005606225,0.000017191234,0.0000895791,0.00002457756,0.000018796689,0.0009289263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99567175,0.000029978277,0.0032447092,0.00007338969,0.000022265836,0.00021931269,0.000043046042,0.00001724554,0.00067822245],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9691279,0.017653782,0.0025815656,0.002807396,0.00696915,0.00086017564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6158826,0.29224864,0.056031886,0.028445525,0.0041801375,0.0032112869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018618217,0.0007657347,0.00072417746,0.0005261823,0.0004922215,0.0015182543,0.0011141447,0.0012212332,0.0028675173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14994864,0.00079507387,0.00036944344,0.00046140593,0.0018967882,0.0013166694,0.0014327631,0.0016968232,0.00027391774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.12170989,0.08465418,0.25945008,0.0009588777,0.0011216543,0.00079277717,0.014093739,0.017968938,0.26454642,0.017874457,0.0020691708,0.21475981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010228355,0.11439628,0.5567681,0.00027241313,0.00090281747,0.0007298173,0.0019687994,0.08919229,0.19292025,0.025697904,0.0063643423,0.0005586245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014030166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012204818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018618217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084151374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000793283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098463714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128997249","doi":"10.1348/014466506x129862","title":"Under what circumstances do patients with schizophrenia jump to conclusions? A liberal acceptance account","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Riverview Hospital; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming); Psychology; Task (project management); Ambiguity; Jump; Cognitive psychology; Convergence (economics); Contrast (vision); Psychosis; Psychiatry; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.1462335675466719,"score_gpt":0.485616779488072,"score_spread":0.3393832119414001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128997249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99336386,0.00020057295,0.0020974039,0.0010156292,0.000015154796,0.000013794296,0.00008237685,0.000019453557,0.003191899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995894,0.0000324833,0.00019271794,0.00006568545,0.000009785194,0.0000038604817,0.000023362778,0.0000024605924,0.00008035755],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833655,0.00050677464,0.00013401172,0.00029364013,0.00048950175,0.0002395035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873375,0.0063179494,0.0035931603,0.0013170287,0.0006488119,0.000785562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029460422,0.00040758125,0.00044121884,0.0010794392,0.00033449856,0.0017583291,0.00052312383,0.0010290669,0.0034346827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017805632,0.00024599044,0.00041018912,0.0003906573,0.002250865,0.0016171433,0.001968866,0.0010312172,0.00038647084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003265678,0.00036638367,0.90582275,0.00017436108,0.00033208932,0.0016729281,0.0069515775,0.0020853917,0.012344831,0.008621792,0.00073317107,0.057628985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021211123,0.00074061035,0.87518775,0.000080456,0.00014693497,0.002655899,0.004291267,0.011260493,0.0030302133,0.1011357,0.0011518939,0.00010667443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010283848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081577245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034346827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041492857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043646814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015580356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129320919","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02113.x","title":"Smarter Than We Think","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":233,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Vlaamse regering","keywords":"Psychology; Normative; Anterior cingulate cortex; Heuristic; Cued speech; Prefrontal cortex; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Lie detection; Cognition; Deception; Neuroscience; Epistemology","score_opus":0.37175879998603656,"score_gpt":0.49329278767700585,"score_spread":0.12153398769096929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129320919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23044795,0.008048602,0.048300985,0.17250615,0.0038850575,0.00015599914,0.00046422947,0.0005766145,0.53561443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8700885,0.004423229,0.016266417,0.049570847,0.001052282,0.00010390926,0.00032942495,0.00023481075,0.057930555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979594,0.0006678161,0.00009329935,0.0004722942,0.0005289785,0.00027827517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996646,0.00086179987,0.00085541094,0.0005648435,0.0006151885,0.0004567544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022280726,0.00047711513,0.00034163703,0.0008137666,0.0010092753,0.005015519,0.00047760297,0.0018773163,0.018044813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009509668,0.00024027398,0.00047460923,0.0005056103,0.005904765,0.007916409,0.0016617632,0.0025176015,0.0068139764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022462435,0.00022587112,0.039638102,0.00059465657,0.0004907234,0.00070503587,0.018958045,0.0011433123,0.0069643534,0.67637837,0.10082931,0.15384759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006874214,0.00013001903,0.01681209,0.00035525794,0.00012752395,0.0010307933,0.009282324,0.0012123737,0.0018230163,0.46592495,0.50310916,0.00012362663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017555302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012611666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018044813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075862225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008164863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060365856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129925846","doi":"10.1017/s0007123412000117","title":"Why Do Citizens Discount the Future? Public Opinion and the Timing of Policy Consequences","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Economics; Public economics; Public opinion; Term (time); Consumption (sociology); Public policy; Politics; Causation; Time preference; Political science; Microeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.10372752853824548,"score_gpt":0.40588853933641783,"score_spread":0.30216101079817237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129925846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9570573,0.00063781237,0.0073124855,0.00840022,0.00009644576,0.000021423695,0.00016014016,0.000034811153,0.026279377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998248,0.00022348594,0.000492057,0.00036680256,0.000040982854,0.0000059836802,0.000026946766,0.0000073561228,0.0005885266],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986136,0.00068153156,0.00006200561,0.0001774192,0.00029338957,0.00017196995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98753905,0.0069815014,0.0029460276,0.0011284949,0.0008492075,0.00055564294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039982894,0.00018919373,0.000363618,0.0003848018,0.00047504014,0.0025937792,0.00029709275,0.0016162659,0.002581238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024246218,0.00021545995,0.0003274625,0.00047169274,0.0013366994,0.0028666856,0.0006084603,0.0018080333,0.0003850365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047450047,0.00092190556,0.40753463,0.000570174,0.0006986581,0.0009082783,0.034049466,0.013216391,0.0242527,0.25282562,0.009855533,0.2504217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033941393,0.0009113722,0.3466268,0.00022568717,0.0005341773,0.00055189343,0.023733478,0.021691604,0.0076516927,0.55935496,0.038092177,0.0002867418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022040766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019276398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039982894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008797454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003599905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021145284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130195989","doi":"10.7202/601409ar","title":"Espérance morale avec risque moral","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16344087390082487,"score_gpt":0.3698712586025557,"score_spread":0.20643038470173083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130195989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018370638,0.0056760204,0.26163012,0.026146539,0.0014324194,0.00010719432,0.0003288727,0.00019776802,0.6861105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74806464,0.0044068154,0.11402031,0.0060835253,0.0016499789,0.0005528176,0.00037326894,0.00025332483,0.1245954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910363,0.004303959,0.00032312746,0.0013588497,0.0023842028,0.0005936171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962334,0.0017777757,0.00042633121,0.0006005087,0.0007251913,0.00023675761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003949254,0.0013971459,0.00088850094,0.0018764775,0.0032571338,0.0072883326,0.0018554406,0.0048019188,0.018817196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061784214,0.0006385083,0.0017860202,0.002063252,0.019233836,0.0088317385,0.005034164,0.0099321,0.002728128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035041621,0.0000037475972,0.00005210524,0.000021323649,0.0000030644837,0.000015851332,0.00021985213,0.00017281077,0.000054060358,0.9973586,0.0006394725,0.0014555416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010714378,0.000012671012,0.00030586307,0.000059449638,0.00000873336,0.00014074029,0.00025243923,0.0011692643,0.00018377941,0.93310577,0.064731985,0.000018598008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005019311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033755682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018817196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005493741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035248736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06294978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130478903","doi":"10.1177/0956797614563958","title":"Scarcity Frames Value","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":410,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Scarcity; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Statistics; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.47363376291587195,"score_gpt":0.5508557516161008,"score_spread":0.07722198870022884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130478903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19864616,0.0030784053,0.14097548,0.018010112,0.0007777955,0.00008562423,0.00023129108,0.000100749916,0.6380944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857357,0.0005698602,0.00651524,0.0005558024,0.00024688285,0.000041899155,0.000047368598,0.00003959316,0.0062475624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986971,0.0004951106,0.000040052186,0.00031597604,0.00028725204,0.00016458177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748516,0.0011743779,0.00033870348,0.00035065107,0.00039336935,0.00025782935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018929609,0.0005389603,0.00041815857,0.0010240952,0.0017596378,0.0037942126,0.00057242514,0.0017404534,0.008593254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007000696,0.0003722049,0.00046649354,0.00062353443,0.0068266797,0.0076437797,0.0027552657,0.001898319,0.0005645297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000676862,0.000024924759,0.00096913514,0.00005697743,0.000017121372,0.00016145215,0.0012633477,0.00075328624,0.00081049756,0.9843299,0.0010491699,0.010496478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001458166,0.000032351105,0.0012514528,0.000037285714,0.000017942233,0.00007214416,0.00053137814,0.0013148412,0.00033134958,0.983925,0.0124598555,0.000011782502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002121625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022166176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008593254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027185201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001023761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02874732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130852452","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x01413914","title":"Objectivity, intentionality, and levels of explanation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intentionality; Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Constructivism (international relations); Psychology; Philosophy; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.3858575790832613,"score_gpt":0.47798897324155076,"score_spread":0.09213139415828947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130852452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14738168,0.0074064704,0.32212785,0.049148455,0.0005940813,0.00019330508,0.0004024552,0.0004552938,0.4722905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97776866,0.00068595086,0.016908532,0.00086797617,0.00015713667,0.00011983137,0.00011398634,0.00007232821,0.0033055737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886241,0.0048276847,0.00074408186,0.0013624203,0.003291156,0.0011505391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771752,0.0124431,0.0025951494,0.0051861503,0.0016550816,0.0009453747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011808456,0.0006161853,0.0009259498,0.0041642287,0.0027265886,0.011577477,0.0030609623,0.0039291657,0.0063802865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028695611,0.0006809384,0.0013202016,0.002355548,0.029138595,0.01959924,0.009725215,0.006159527,0.00051304343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022411834,0.000009008962,0.00071227894,0.00002870161,0.000016970827,0.00003754923,0.0010241056,0.00028240564,0.000080332386,0.9945199,0.0002473027,0.0030189934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000806619,0.0000050177437,0.0002971526,0.000021062104,0.0000057509355,0.000025177427,0.00017996441,0.00049330894,0.00007773987,0.9968947,0.0019860086,0.000006019633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021800243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011868825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011808456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040013897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019120323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062449813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131123655","doi":"10.1093/qje/qju033","title":"The Psychological Effect of Weather on Car Purchases*","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Quarterly Journal of Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":255,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Purchasing; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Intertemporal choice; Consumer behaviour; Mental accounting; Variety (cybernetics); Durable good; Econometrics; Advertising; Microeconomics; Computer science; Psychology; Business; Cognitive psychology; Operations management","score_opus":0.07184151106119721,"score_gpt":0.38489941000867356,"score_spread":0.3130578989474764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131123655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99771714,0.00008806509,0.0002804407,0.000082346385,0.0000058033784,0.000003189982,0.00010081221,0.000003854751,0.0017184082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99965584,0.00003936346,0.000117094714,0.000015108096,0.000008275932,0.0000014024174,0.0000592011,0.0000014628437,0.00010238128],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992186,0.00040678066,0.000055055134,0.000099489,0.00015783228,0.000062306855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740777,0.016942376,0.006372221,0.0009518025,0.0009877817,0.00066804787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013343005,0.00014197233,0.0002077985,0.00042868263,0.00023570617,0.0009987458,0.00014567548,0.00037148848,0.004315741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015110646,0.00016686984,0.0002985428,0.0005704394,0.0007532175,0.0007272405,0.0005656036,0.0006886606,0.0002483359],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006205425,0.00021560848,0.98233646,0.000053912045,0.00020746002,0.00009718875,0.0005188477,0.0012645117,0.002461988,0.0009144159,0.00031100042,0.010997973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005040753,0.00006198385,0.99782526,0.000004341408,0.000027445294,0.000036271307,0.00021621722,0.0008260498,0.00030878372,0.0004898937,0.00019006494,0.000008591931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027293945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002960127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004315741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028950928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000083581675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014437556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131258498","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2006.04.010","title":"Inter-temporal preference for flexibility and risky choice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Preference; Mathematical economics; Normative; Consistency (knowledge bases); Ex-ante; Representation (politics); Key (lock); Subjective expected utility; Time consistency; Econometrics; Economics; Revealed preference; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer science; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.22270796674666915,"score_gpt":0.4046448403129322,"score_spread":0.18193687356626304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131258498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94662666,0.00030700167,0.043725286,0.0004765228,0.000028870476,0.000016566244,0.00008735081,0.000027397644,0.008704314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733835,0.00006362313,0.0020190564,0.000022663146,0.000017602586,0.0000076135325,0.000031940624,0.000005821759,0.0004932264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992525,0.00028617523,0.00006573205,0.00013890138,0.00015400807,0.000102586804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979041,0.014479804,0.0029414757,0.0018399536,0.000510593,0.0011872583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029107942,0.00030729978,0.0004013775,0.00060550094,0.00028588268,0.00208549,0.0005023384,0.0010420409,0.008331562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022000924,0.00025134083,0.00068530877,0.0005359892,0.00097245397,0.0027640841,0.00082297623,0.0013004873,0.00021645283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045369575,0.00090989005,0.13367647,0.00046593903,0.0010019903,0.0025393632,0.0020686677,0.057399385,0.024192313,0.67851466,0.0010975762,0.093596876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017586508,0.0005626563,0.10165048,0.000046663376,0.00019889468,0.0012487624,0.000742609,0.10101934,0.0014423843,0.7917825,0.00101378,0.000116091156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046737798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006896487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008331562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004958823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002672972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027871847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131540949","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01817.x","title":"Are Juvenile Offenders Extreme Future Discounters?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Juvenile delinquency; Sensation seeking; Developmental psychology; Personality; Task (project management); Scale (ratio); Big Five personality traits; Social psychology","score_opus":0.24216982227378017,"score_gpt":0.4470223768588267,"score_spread":0.2048525545850465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131540949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99918777,0.000066579414,0.00004397937,0.00008832199,0.0000033316799,0.0000037844582,0.000022454948,0.0000023867665,0.0005813851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995701,0.000117575095,0.000048275182,0.000029975059,0.0000072079615,0.000002463912,0.000025490745,9.943737e-7,0.0001981001],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969923,0.000057958707,0.00003370423,0.000043018994,0.00008605289,0.00007999483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962287,0.0006101889,0.0023965572,0.0001848351,0.00016227512,0.0004175222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055070216,0.00014538644,0.00021947324,0.0007003616,0.0004326517,0.0009113155,0.0001694707,0.00040164145,0.0015345081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047254465,0.00017612739,0.00015681525,0.00036714302,0.00056265254,0.00056286063,0.00034834,0.0006435515,0.00015826485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028465028,0.0001652906,0.9809616,0.000023384244,0.00002790024,0.0013696802,0.002147584,0.000030834897,0.0015821554,0.0003252278,0.00017590799,0.012905838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012215707,0.00011184418,0.9909055,0.00001596989,0.000022573255,0.004102434,0.0031310453,0.0001396239,0.00033758383,0.0005233722,0.00068536715,0.000012527763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019301315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031409364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019301315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020518758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015371197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0051335096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131762860","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1077708","title":"Procrastination and Impatience","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Procrastination; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07745090180996358,"score_gpt":0.35895283263990735,"score_spread":0.2815019308299438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131762860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9200112,0.0006687969,0.00213946,0.0027886275,0.000055084995,0.000036447345,0.00003620809,0.000020240012,0.07424394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855083,0.00008497873,0.00016183735,0.00014448655,0.000022625783,0.000008413785,0.000009067622,0.000003906502,0.0010138829],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958026,0.0022025027,0.00022639633,0.00036759162,0.0007945542,0.0006064148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9231865,0.04426713,0.017146619,0.00623914,0.0032098917,0.005950747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043397504,0.0002977787,0.00040565556,0.0016131235,0.0012491138,0.0031256417,0.000644102,0.0015733121,0.0069422633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04599794,0.00016551068,0.000407462,0.0008683669,0.0055193887,0.0017063373,0.0018037682,0.0026819115,0.0003681361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016209414,0.0028272416,0.535733,0.00029915365,0.000529447,0.0062027806,0.034436326,0.003195967,0.0028229095,0.21115057,0.004312357,0.1968693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022931877,0.001507595,0.5676916,0.00019709219,0.00028233175,0.009695843,0.025708739,0.010159155,0.0019925074,0.36390135,0.018449776,0.00018465563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090039044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008707524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069422633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091631635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006376545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023224235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134645122","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1763","title":"The Effect of Temporal Distance on Attitudes toward Imprecise Probabilities and Imprecise Outcomes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Salience (neuroscience); Construal level theory; Outcome (game theory); Ambiguity aversion; Dimension (graph theory); Psychology; Subjective expected utility; Social psychology; Econometrics; Computer science; Expected utility hypothesis; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.08945839551006228,"score_gpt":0.43622934465415264,"score_spread":0.34677094914409035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134645122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957438,0.000070138594,0.0007536432,0.00010986553,0.000009530207,0.0000066956813,0.000009526434,0.0000029406558,0.0032938134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991856,0.000049399197,0.0004491605,0.000036207082,0.0000071960562,0.0000057467296,0.000011330771,0.0000022762413,0.000253055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978064,0.0012297566,0.00012103753,0.00019387393,0.00054173445,0.00010720569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9578434,0.029660068,0.0075072865,0.0018558938,0.001026529,0.0021068512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037228174,0.00023783655,0.00027797132,0.00041734046,0.0004195725,0.0021742678,0.00028630407,0.0007930041,0.0054551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027132204,0.00023230311,0.00033362527,0.00034449963,0.0010247022,0.0010585045,0.0009210062,0.0013612573,0.0002091025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017459482,0.007719609,0.72105044,0.00074344425,0.0011057792,0.0014841096,0.022255844,0.017245485,0.057771645,0.04032835,0.0014962383,0.11133951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000528824,0.005656433,0.90549254,0.00017398481,0.00052054337,0.0007859233,0.008639412,0.024942571,0.006653164,0.042479582,0.0039095264,0.00021749387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073193986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084252714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041490287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025246557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019688368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135643459","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.273724","title":"Iterated Expectations under Rank-Dependent Expected Utility and Model Consistency","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Lottery; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical economics; Subjective expected utility; Valuation (finance); Impossibility; Econometrics; Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.25498415820604586,"score_gpt":0.3805275900424586,"score_spread":0.12554343183641276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135643459","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04894438,0.00033089097,0.9356457,0.0025725113,0.00003738021,0.000082750325,0.00026932114,0.00019956612,0.011917433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8442026,0.0005711906,0.14611515,0.0005292412,0.00017793944,0.00045861016,0.0004483959,0.00014151598,0.0073553096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869402,0.008022717,0.0007350301,0.0018223366,0.0016963461,0.00078348204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93803406,0.048166674,0.00510892,0.0054266304,0.0024473204,0.00081630616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01632287,0.00092308345,0.0022521152,0.0009967145,0.00089403073,0.005023511,0.0032569387,0.0024747704,0.005583644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06764163,0.0010592308,0.0027493958,0.0011739419,0.0041949633,0.010314261,0.0038276622,0.0043928307,0.0006169898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002699723,0.000029623356,0.00048410596,0.000045033998,0.000050207782,0.00008199983,0.00012760819,0.03428546,0.00013948017,0.9608849,0.00042723195,0.0034172856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017834349,0.000016632734,0.00011685844,0.000012802831,0.000009063748,0.00003546584,0.00001745794,0.10069766,0.00012182033,0.89859325,0.00034847835,0.000012778923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001528387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010729971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01632287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027856182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020943177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08632457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135727220","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0092160","title":"The Child as Econometrician: A Rational Model of Preference Understanding in Children","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; James S. McDonnell Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Preference; Simple (philosophy); Revealed preference; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Econometrics; Economics; Microeconomics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.40889698204856734,"score_gpt":0.3385720280620146,"score_spread":0.07032495398655275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135727220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73526734,0.0013199926,0.20527892,0.009654647,0.00004008925,0.00006425432,0.0006198084,0.00025403046,0.047500927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634135,0.00060241995,0.032130245,0.00033574805,0.000013796856,0.00006186259,0.00014699687,0.000042301683,0.0032531188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921274,0.00039844587,0.00003089282,0.00015549218,0.000100461875,0.000101996535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99657995,0.0023126844,0.00040568906,0.0003879165,0.00017229917,0.00014152344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021314805,0.00042705116,0.00040795855,0.00056973053,0.00043013846,0.0020899733,0.00076220126,0.0011666368,0.0038825283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008330805,0.00044897935,0.0006501092,0.00046594845,0.002395811,0.00387282,0.0013797028,0.0017026002,0.00060416583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024946537,0.0001933952,0.061164353,0.00017497897,0.0000664668,0.0012103383,0.010673888,0.037526686,0.004196865,0.8499743,0.0023285472,0.032240734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009524974,0.00017238488,0.02935967,0.00011795562,0.00009190196,0.0013727807,0.0028208424,0.20050965,0.0027425543,0.7515808,0.01101754,0.00011868558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075368187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045640594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075368187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010748785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008596162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014985919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136623844","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.004","title":"Are we good at detecting conflict during reasoning?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Neglect; Social psychology; Base (topology); Cognitive psychology; Personality","score_opus":0.21907394691581433,"score_gpt":0.40171507044023874,"score_spread":0.1826411235244244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136623844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.521303,0.038893424,0.15843044,0.21214594,0.0024943522,0.00016474456,0.0005333231,0.00066119287,0.065373614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674526,0.002391535,0.022585018,0.00588555,0.0005461628,0.00006137672,0.00010752275,0.00009879742,0.0008713772],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.98482925,0.008523041,0.0007871171,0.0018538279,0.0027639016,0.0012428812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82706404,0.12042961,0.020475438,0.012908992,0.011753637,0.007368262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028200999,0.001118019,0.0018227537,0.0035246897,0.0016056761,0.011541698,0.00236834,0.007507784,0.007935062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21402013,0.0012207272,0.0011943841,0.0021105965,0.010460026,0.026512088,0.0023694548,0.0056694993,0.0016812874],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047130655,0.001830481,0.2298508,0.0020371194,0.0045891386,0.0008717845,0.0075186435,0.012694622,0.007222008,0.20543927,0.03058733,0.49264574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022607372,0.0002588732,0.039740592,0.00045425296,0.00041772725,0.00051864376,0.002175313,0.011708776,0.0027387566,0.9332804,0.008305395,0.0001750942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002175467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017088515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028200999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018931284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025042994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14914292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136762929","doi":"10.1111/1467-9280.01438","title":"Psychological Models of Professional Decision Making","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":252,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristic; Psychology; Process (computing); Ideal (ethics); Simple (philosophy); Social psychology; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.3179719015263955,"score_gpt":0.5405903908261886,"score_spread":0.22261848929979317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136762929","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19461276,0.0041953987,0.4143306,0.032987315,0.00025482735,0.0004002335,0.0006168684,0.00023943289,0.35236254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9523315,0.0018807267,0.038086727,0.0010102321,0.0001607854,0.0002457757,0.00021043491,0.000021952952,0.0060520098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996564,0.0020105108,0.00010562867,0.00039017494,0.0006868654,0.00024286543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888387,0.007667994,0.0011535027,0.00091151596,0.0008729266,0.00055536855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004531627,0.00068024185,0.0003998688,0.001767078,0.0008433806,0.0054229167,0.0013395279,0.0018096105,0.005000244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012499848,0.00035893777,0.0007121938,0.0017871251,0.0050078887,0.004045314,0.0011327417,0.0020629712,0.00096499664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003195601,0.000098161174,0.003553125,0.00007622356,0.00005498823,0.00004991222,0.0013987473,0.017733593,0.000086460386,0.9626892,0.0017022413,0.012525425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028256012,0.00003514432,0.0020437886,0.000035778266,0.000017557144,0.00007789928,0.00035609512,0.028437007,0.000043752334,0.962106,0.006801658,0.000017190207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025919038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001893113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054229167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025541503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020120908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023965776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136793642","doi":"10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00025.x","title":"Rationality and the Adolescent Mind","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Gothic.net","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Psychology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Psychotherapist; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07371184409555227,"score_gpt":0.391485847503846,"score_spread":0.31777400340829376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136793642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13553548,0.093529195,0.015078818,0.107020535,0.0014824341,0.0000677233,0.00016169927,0.00008364139,0.64704055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.952975,0.014580717,0.0029920454,0.008587065,0.00033376066,0.000054129487,0.000046945257,0.0000309116,0.020399448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988992,0.0006597835,0.00002982598,0.00014564283,0.00013340016,0.00013219197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884605,0.00065022864,0.00015335462,0.00008339225,0.000117570075,0.00014938842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002363542,0.00024361837,0.00023920699,0.0007298545,0.0013204041,0.002828047,0.00047868333,0.0014960984,0.0045231148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037997696,0.00014320701,0.00027137212,0.0003437264,0.0075302413,0.0029536437,0.0019943528,0.0030592545,0.0004863609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020771538,0.000019124655,0.0021210127,0.000057196554,0.0000090144495,0.00016981433,0.012627837,0.00014163007,0.00012070612,0.9570669,0.0059984736,0.021647528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026665748,0.00004511122,0.0050847675,0.00044225846,0.000017158347,0.00068845233,0.006767916,0.00033301747,0.00026516826,0.72986966,0.25643975,0.000020039375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018355437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015758766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045231148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018574197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013698204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015131354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136847985","doi":"10.1142/s0217590804000779","title":"ECONOMICS, ECONOMISTS, AND BEHAVIOURAL ECONOMICS: SOME ISSUES OF CHOICE","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Singapore Economic Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Positive economics; Behavioural economics; Variance (accounting); Experimental economics; Behavioral economics; Public economics; Neoclassical economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.1539336878156136,"score_gpt":0.39956136528476444,"score_spread":0.24562767746915085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136847985","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004853095,0.4117032,0.03443435,0.5131273,0.003484088,0.000048000344,0.00008974404,0.000026456484,0.0322337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33321458,0.4563047,0.035583783,0.11365744,0.043799333,0.00071300357,0.00019566147,0.00012603239,0.016405469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917441,0.005787956,0.00034043426,0.00044877193,0.0014156355,0.00026303082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9653867,0.031044185,0.00081991864,0.0008051097,0.0013495857,0.0005944704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013899922,0.0011823598,0.002411121,0.004103983,0.002425618,0.0070134657,0.0019609437,0.0090510845,0.0046012835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023539761,0.00095117575,0.0012355967,0.0072746594,0.029455187,0.020689517,0.0032916807,0.009715254,0.00075325236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023204251,0.00004433479,0.00047856008,0.00028510718,0.000035750545,0.0000756458,0.00041742748,0.00058477157,0.000046074212,0.97640663,0.008707946,0.012894485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012460768,0.000011137891,0.00036828447,0.00013708329,0.000004674696,0.000056243367,0.00023662997,0.00033453945,0.000014966674,0.97976226,0.019052833,0.0000088685765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036290747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022450138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013899922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004992054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002424062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07351071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136956023","doi":"10.1080/00346764.2010.517631","title":"Freedom to Choose and Choice X-inefficiencies: Human and Consumer Rights, and Positive and Normative Implications of Choice Behavior","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Social Economy","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Satisficing; Normative; Freedom of choice; Economics; Perspective (graphical); Microeconomics; Consumer choice; Public choice; Rational choice theory (criminology); Preference; Narrative; Public good; Positive economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05603001922893941,"score_gpt":0.40966324351142575,"score_spread":0.35363322428248634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136956023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1365241,0.004371204,0.14781831,0.04690175,0.0002059152,0.00020214402,0.0003085481,0.000050776296,0.66361725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97534716,0.0010216661,0.009355146,0.0012027954,0.00012443235,0.00020387852,0.00004797496,0.000021565522,0.012675287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612373,0.002337116,0.00015202779,0.00045389624,0.00052745006,0.00040577142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893935,0.006849374,0.0015368155,0.0011946688,0.0006216892,0.00040400669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054378123,0.00062820385,0.0005676278,0.0009288281,0.002022285,0.006014287,0.0011425104,0.0036418422,0.009987897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012112545,0.0003643953,0.0009756381,0.0011496126,0.026506834,0.01077389,0.0034991663,0.004181307,0.00054800085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007437153,0.000012226283,0.00034558214,0.000009445199,0.00000331199,0.000028281644,0.00032935545,0.0005144219,0.000027201719,0.9974299,0.00017461284,0.001118124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066630605,0.000007046271,0.00024663558,0.00002412721,0.0000029812097,0.00004087607,0.00022614817,0.0010284876,0.000045154386,0.9951428,0.0032243927,0.000004759868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033671805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020910138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009987897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034787266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002120862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033412814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137079573","doi":"","title":"Risk, Ambiguity, and the Klibanoff Axioms","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Ambiguity; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Subjective expected utility; Class (philosophy); Econometrics; Choquet integral; Economics; Utility theory; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.13634121487098547,"score_gpt":0.4234576745316486,"score_spread":0.2871164596606631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137079573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15412031,0.003101325,0.37661982,0.025803424,0.0007969967,0.00039220892,0.0011685467,0.0003429897,0.43765447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8889924,0.0011578699,0.08966473,0.0035428368,0.00031673384,0.00057626865,0.00029002363,0.00010650006,0.015352603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915876,0.0030866493,0.0006581944,0.0011935344,0.0028823616,0.0005916972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747121,0.015804352,0.0021561102,0.0051470012,0.001546982,0.0006334441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011378711,0.0010316436,0.0015561574,0.0009647461,0.0022470485,0.0047788993,0.0018919214,0.0035444365,0.011375268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042728867,0.000670149,0.0013637227,0.00097458827,0.00959302,0.011667623,0.0041092113,0.004646027,0.0010912071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004749226,0.000025248773,0.00028242046,0.000037331,0.0000087203425,0.000018896018,0.00011656846,0.00065298413,0.00022716292,0.99265325,0.0010755901,0.004854299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002096503,0.00001748331,0.00023552055,0.000013293738,0.0000042619167,0.000027903314,0.000034443903,0.0012314672,0.00013576874,0.9961981,0.0020709164,0.000009933532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016616692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013011296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011378711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00270656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023178603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060177088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139385563","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2455861","title":"'And Lead Us Not into Temptation': Presentation Formats and the Choice of Risky Alternatives","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Temptation; Lead (geology); Presentation (obstetrics); Business; Economics; Advertising; Psychology; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05109051059846425,"score_gpt":0.3863922636890647,"score_spread":0.33530175309060045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139385563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88141084,0.0017186052,0.0136355525,0.012239335,0.0006042617,0.00014181448,0.00019198169,0.000084182226,0.08997341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888986,0.00061215385,0.0048822523,0.0010851405,0.00021179087,0.00008462611,0.000072352384,0.000052969484,0.0041000326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935416,0.0050135283,0.0002031953,0.00024142677,0.00079701043,0.0002031488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89724153,0.08946442,0.0070279995,0.0024207965,0.0024668374,0.001378511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009907213,0.0004369548,0.00036139035,0.0007200351,0.000799451,0.0066107535,0.0009567003,0.0036143076,0.020362379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13035254,0.0003567189,0.0004688006,0.00067954004,0.0018677892,0.007598117,0.0015910994,0.0031706565,0.0014515519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018861812,0.0059975777,0.08306399,0.0013501173,0.00039592598,0.0018533122,0.035502013,0.008996024,0.00943258,0.40570056,0.034837052,0.39400905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027826577,0.0033614158,0.0670871,0.0012625576,0.000747101,0.001929179,0.0223124,0.04750163,0.0044321697,0.8235581,0.024524186,0.0005014665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007863543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006229152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020362379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073191826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006961252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06811893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139736626","doi":"10.1002/acp.915","title":"Associations between myside bias on an informal reasoning task and amount of post‐secondary education","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Task (project management); Cognitive bias; Cognition; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.11122602273885301,"score_gpt":0.42982739081744586,"score_spread":0.31860136807859285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139736626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99943775,0.000028089178,0.00006477498,0.000023775108,0.000002868765,0.0000062202807,0.000023072498,0.0000035065475,0.00040999491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991898,0.000055924782,0.00021315577,0.000022725386,0.000006049555,0.0000118729085,0.00008607246,0.0000031640848,0.00041119265],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981109,0.000579789,0.00033409876,0.00016048756,0.0006579202,0.00015683149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89529216,0.055736966,0.03425062,0.0048708455,0.0048892987,0.004960136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004250759,0.00038697597,0.00038584854,0.0011386252,0.00041376846,0.0017771112,0.0004181973,0.00086968276,0.0042413757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05408499,0.00032428897,0.00026815053,0.0005402809,0.0007156085,0.0008198395,0.0009441988,0.0013638877,0.0005935347],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008486233,0.00140767,0.97443306,0.0000565591,0.000106576845,0.00013194226,0.0023270324,0.00026909728,0.0046181837,0.00018360012,0.00021198734,0.015405576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065525004,0.0006965559,0.9939492,0.000027147358,0.000030408934,0.00024731876,0.0012657251,0.00089615857,0.0017519348,0.00060347054,0.00044101654,0.00002566875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066225044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015498683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004250759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033200046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031531876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022480488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139981419","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2015.03.007","title":"Calibration without reduction for non-expected utility","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Calibration; Axiom; Risk aversion (psychology); Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Decision maker; Reduction (mathematics); Prospect theory; Class (philosophy); Subjective expected utility; Computer science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.19637265388168457,"score_gpt":0.4241549731591244,"score_spread":0.22778231927743986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139981419","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03326673,0.0005601673,0.9360328,0.0030702204,0.00040030276,0.00013226512,0.00028002716,0.0011326389,0.025124801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.832609,0.00045091994,0.14217891,0.0010961917,0.00041280477,0.00020469024,0.00032246776,0.0005431451,0.022181893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953511,0.0021216974,0.0001643432,0.0010772316,0.0008419874,0.00044365512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98450744,0.008641253,0.0005847569,0.004966292,0.0010796452,0.00022063538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059865694,0.0011888563,0.0018684034,0.0010398523,0.00060029776,0.0022532158,0.0027045077,0.0032381697,0.01614854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04522314,0.00085988204,0.0015351803,0.00085232424,0.0017348182,0.005337339,0.0033889734,0.004832693,0.002361519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004958575,0.0003899827,0.0014017705,0.00046676796,0.00021638148,0.0003301536,0.00019374091,0.12844238,0.007968935,0.7138242,0.010673717,0.13559604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090399866,0.000091391616,0.0009675685,0.00006934927,0.000062850406,0.00024522323,0.00003540741,0.4070608,0.0035973915,0.5832304,0.0044932542,0.000056002224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066768413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045001498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01614854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011203986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010097784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054022253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140237961","doi":"10.1007/s11002-005-5897-x","title":"The Psychology of Intertemporal Discounting: Why are Distant Events Valued Differently from Proximal Ones?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marketing Letters","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":253,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Time preference; Discounting; Intertemporal choice; Preference; Temporal discounting; Variety (cybernetics); Delay discounting; Function (biology); Economics; Psychology; Key (lock); Positive economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.08003616924439622,"score_gpt":0.3722128846263321,"score_spread":0.2921767153819359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140237961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6320954,0.013063267,0.057394665,0.20049354,0.0021804438,0.000036632897,0.00048036213,0.00008197006,0.09417375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986267,0.0026387286,0.003626863,0.005412206,0.0005611719,0.000013243317,0.0000495391,0.000025625459,0.0014056754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916136,0.00034347968,0.00003653105,0.00015765762,0.00023578855,0.00006508067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888659,0.007639606,0.0013333758,0.00055083906,0.00095409557,0.0006561741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024362481,0.00021176015,0.00046507388,0.0005487647,0.0004798801,0.003706374,0.0006069356,0.001855664,0.0050964323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025014771,0.00021745711,0.0002291763,0.00091932196,0.0032569387,0.0045366874,0.0006186686,0.0030720383,0.0005323906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016390049,0.00041427137,0.039012756,0.00071403984,0.0003383136,0.0006984616,0.0036819314,0.003192274,0.008399307,0.6551871,0.02185685,0.26486585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000780859,0.000077342986,0.022330407,0.000062345345,0.000052816977,0.00026374232,0.0009396501,0.0023611572,0.00070067716,0.9656551,0.007442175,0.000036543825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00106557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009886727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050964323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010948548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046865857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017049253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140580587","doi":"10.1037/bne0000037","title":"Age differences in strategy selection and risk preference during risk-based decision making.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral Neuroscience","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Research Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Preference; Odds; Delay discounting; Developmental psychology; Discounting; Certainty; Young adult; Risk aversion (psychology); Reinforcement; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Impulsivity; Expected utility hypothesis; Medicine; Internal medicine; Statistics; Logistic regression","score_opus":0.30336061822025306,"score_gpt":0.41082597411139476,"score_spread":0.1074653558911417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140580587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982999,0.00031253518,0.0007207114,0.00003087723,0.000009086202,0.000004084021,0.00007638595,0.0000053800504,0.0005410779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833006,0.00023512526,0.00065965566,0.000026863892,0.000004752352,0.000007286679,0.000078853,0.0000033205824,0.0006540832],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998765,0.000024824883,0.000011621283,0.000033751567,0.00003614294,0.000017202157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927825,0.00012015811,0.0003535522,0.00006373083,0.000058795587,0.00012543943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005185592,0.00021263033,0.00016885535,0.0002410622,0.00006739144,0.0003013518,0.000102168924,0.00018265497,0.0011558491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012426612,0.00009380036,0.00011724959,0.000103490216,0.00019331268,0.00027444185,0.00018096925,0.0003045587,0.00009874963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027832484,0.0007295498,0.3979788,0.00017654801,0.00027019228,0.00065033924,0.0012689874,0.001211739,0.5190246,0.0020456985,0.00068211893,0.07317813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013672481,0.0009167778,0.9861816,0.000010604572,0.000047686433,0.00034166113,0.00013328789,0.0012463701,0.008934268,0.0012619414,0.00089005707,0.000022035656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007591955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015344905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0011558491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016220086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016554746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0038667321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141141748","doi":"10.1037/xge0000046","title":"Priming memories of past wins induces risk seeking.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Gambling Research Institute, University of Calgary; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Priming (agriculture); Psychology; Risk-seeking; Task (project management); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.12415944770800594,"score_gpt":0.45541992137930165,"score_spread":0.33126047367129574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141141748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975793,0.00022080733,0.0009964614,0.00009786107,0.000049341943,0.000015245879,0.00003006993,0.00003060703,0.0009803622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797076,0.00012387107,0.0012205931,0.000071796174,0.000021849264,0.000018842555,0.00003774368,0.000010892989,0.0005235671],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979097,0.000052372725,0.000013490664,0.00006388545,0.000040068877,0.00003928488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895835,0.00044502906,0.00023696072,0.0001416106,0.00003465541,0.00018341509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044872437,0.00031197746,0.0003616845,0.00014541138,0.00013050546,0.00036315375,0.00015596228,0.00041545043,0.003310989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017756391,0.00025945937,0.00022913152,0.00008293533,0.00034346155,0.00041079978,0.0005686737,0.0009267048,0.00029166133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042821495,0.0010056883,0.007771032,0.00033595177,0.00009600491,0.00034334435,0.0004663546,0.00016646291,0.9652897,0.0012725489,0.00035093736,0.018619852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094222353,0.015008441,0.19624251,0.00010407709,0.00038660667,0.0020424186,0.0005394906,0.004217336,0.76670694,0.010184889,0.0035352411,0.00008981278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010625476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012416851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003310989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101699545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011076331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141733736","doi":"","title":"Harsanyi’s Social Aggregation Theorem : A Multi-Profile Approach with Variable-Population Extensions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Variable (mathematics); Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Utilitarianism; Population; Mathematics; Economics; Ex-ante; Econometrics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Demography","score_opus":0.035875470955354184,"score_gpt":0.24486806541656725,"score_spread":0.20899259446121307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141733736","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008128573,0.00041249898,0.9803647,0.0009948723,0.000066533205,0.000049559607,0.00008221837,0.00003863101,0.0098623205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6222771,0.0016355601,0.36495745,0.00056504336,0.00065088214,0.00064591,0.00018865979,0.00008678759,0.008992694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930569,0.0042076646,0.00026800256,0.0007632179,0.0013058608,0.00039835548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882124,0.0077347467,0.0010074709,0.001445845,0.0011876463,0.00041188335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012058385,0.001074641,0.0017640531,0.0023200898,0.0015192739,0.0037418741,0.0027810112,0.0017536668,0.0035560676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01999825,0.00064448826,0.002515867,0.0025282921,0.0035558394,0.007586778,0.0040895417,0.0036805228,0.00047909122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007894118,0.000013527022,0.00016505695,0.000022105804,0.000030206467,0.000029736995,0.00009093915,0.01791163,0.00006385701,0.9744373,0.00058275065,0.0066450713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008705441,0.000013731757,0.0001334263,0.00001784875,0.000010306359,0.000024585064,0.00003117497,0.09371934,0.0000608304,0.9041587,0.0018075539,0.000013898367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017651024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014324636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012058385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033537834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016705755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063771605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141956557","doi":"10.3758/bf03195278","title":"The inverse fallacy: An account of deviations from Bayes’s theorem and the additivity principle","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Additive function; Conditional probability; Fallacy; Inverse; Bayesian probability; Bayes' theorem; Generalization; Normative; Mathematical economics; Posterior probability; Psychology; Chain rule (probability); Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics; Law of total probability; Epistemology; Mathematical analysis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11986455281691656,"score_gpt":0.35638252002149096,"score_spread":0.2365179672045744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141956557","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07481266,0.009809909,0.61133605,0.07352428,0.0020801958,0.00007929146,0.00039128723,0.0005019673,0.22746435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92005306,0.0026689472,0.059557006,0.005378608,0.0028654875,0.0001417851,0.00015281944,0.000245212,0.0089371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923578,0.0030455363,0.00041765513,0.0010610556,0.0026922107,0.00042560254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97283465,0.021066178,0.0012576891,0.002931086,0.0015419342,0.0003684868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010639498,0.0009217352,0.0019348882,0.002912483,0.0017195318,0.0061838133,0.0030655086,0.0043973727,0.0055245887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044507492,0.000903976,0.0014615024,0.0017701582,0.012212843,0.013511204,0.003971653,0.006460009,0.0008636268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017411698,0.000009340542,0.00013417666,0.000025282123,0.000015499318,0.000051994717,0.000103141865,0.0016178878,0.000041298532,0.9924584,0.0011762165,0.004349346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028540153,0.0000014041681,0.000021778264,0.000004105081,0.0000020891696,0.000016257556,0.0000043853915,0.0019870887,0.000018794835,0.99747133,0.00046669858,0.000003149682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014201704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010214117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010639498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001924178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016231224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05626774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143177887","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001","title":"Intuition, reason, and metacognition","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":694,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Intuition; Metamemory; Feeling; Task (project management); Fluency; Cognition; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.511818764827479,"score_gpt":0.4999096014207356,"score_spread":0.011909163406743417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143177887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72040075,0.009094723,0.19194596,0.012025007,0.0002334109,0.00008863394,0.0003204982,0.00020960266,0.06568129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834241,0.0011784504,0.013763351,0.0002744688,0.000058897967,0.00003673953,0.00008061653,0.000014753673,0.0011685361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981729,0.00088819844,0.00010645108,0.00030587954,0.0003763703,0.00015021462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9687846,0.024444394,0.002759623,0.002119341,0.0011099788,0.00078215904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005045661,0.0005463096,0.00066658575,0.0013776624,0.00043773293,0.0047512366,0.00081926543,0.001663237,0.0048528765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031285293,0.0004101506,0.0006891224,0.00084420986,0.004163102,0.0062727043,0.0014403379,0.0019537357,0.0003130596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009838629,0.0006468494,0.033016253,0.00086101773,0.0006877705,0.00019344459,0.0020202873,0.026927575,0.0026836335,0.7949695,0.0025083858,0.1345014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003942945,0.000041017895,0.0068531833,0.000047722875,0.000048646074,0.000067055116,0.00012758948,0.010102239,0.00041218745,0.98136306,0.0008678517,0.000029890341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014519292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013987821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005045661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010089384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00135648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026684344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144032325","doi":"10.1177/0886368709341860","title":"Pay for Performance—Panacea or Pandora’s Box? Revisiting an Old Debate in the Current Economic Environment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Panacea (medicine); Economics; Current (fluid); Public economics; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.2258718516793867,"score_gpt":0.41508956229201016,"score_spread":0.18921771061262346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144032325","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035346788,0.2644094,0.004872747,0.6998232,0.00776833,0.000009838512,0.00005263543,0.000028414892,0.019500677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3096366,0.4101644,0.006585773,0.21468829,0.04859567,0.00008119434,0.000059687998,0.00010939331,0.010079041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99449664,0.0025524676,0.00024436266,0.00078930974,0.0016283133,0.00028888456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97450817,0.019686574,0.0012331635,0.0009076659,0.002928516,0.00073587964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018774256,0.0005326249,0.0016563375,0.0016969797,0.0021853766,0.0070010438,0.0019528545,0.0076268236,0.0052470863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029595777,0.00026787943,0.00050952134,0.0022501743,0.015783984,0.013639151,0.0022209964,0.011242244,0.0009050739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015063389,0.00005561927,0.0006957988,0.0010464704,0.000093469,0.00008724525,0.00051488646,0.00042746222,0.00025345312,0.729038,0.0664021,0.20123485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047203506,0.000086334636,0.0017504836,0.0026476737,0.00006940458,0.00012363635,0.0010210174,0.0006418566,0.00016573681,0.6024366,0.39096978,0.0000402001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031154496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045674946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018774256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024966968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046769143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09928894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144066648","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01144","title":"The psychology of Bayesian reasoning","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Bayesian probability; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Psychiatry; Computer science","score_opus":0.06115652445867438,"score_gpt":0.42475486965663534,"score_spread":0.36359834519796097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144066648","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029370358,0.048154857,0.40995854,0.14597353,0.0020850445,0.00010726729,0.00065599044,0.00034944175,0.3633449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.872418,0.020705394,0.08219222,0.006543961,0.004285222,0.00018181569,0.00021424821,0.00015319705,0.013305962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941983,0.0035988109,0.00017536234,0.0007417032,0.001099245,0.00018649679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747994,0.020856975,0.00095881964,0.001386736,0.0014933541,0.00050469366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008739946,0.0005960541,0.000952194,0.0022006042,0.0011720764,0.0071912375,0.0010734382,0.00315742,0.009711182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02906594,0.0005622555,0.0008426902,0.0012821608,0.016468793,0.007891465,0.0015616682,0.004546267,0.0013497376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020239007,0.000013384799,0.0003570313,0.00008833741,0.000039655923,0.000029879271,0.00022340723,0.0017168273,0.00009499997,0.9786299,0.0029819491,0.01580434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070208066,0.0000019046192,0.00016145762,0.000020540368,0.000003956959,0.000017200067,0.000018534285,0.0010378822,0.000016010574,0.9962592,0.0024524431,0.0000038505423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032386715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016346609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009711182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026975395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015948609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046221793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144130856","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02453.x","title":"Order in Choice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vineland Research and Innovation Centre; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Sequence (biology); Psychology; Wine tasting; Sequence learning; Wine; Cognitive psychology; Process (computing); Order (exchange); Social psychology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.2702629065633216,"score_gpt":0.5464889363158811,"score_spread":0.27622602975255955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144130856","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10496827,0.00751832,0.25585964,0.016592026,0.0013577,0.00025513954,0.00086907286,0.0002816313,0.6122982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9039094,0.0027447224,0.050392,0.0015640121,0.00044221137,0.00021975565,0.0005288896,0.00009622109,0.040102825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950093,0.0019888114,0.0003553776,0.0009730884,0.0012783087,0.00039509207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894434,0.006455987,0.0008652159,0.0016405975,0.0010464829,0.0005483874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049209013,0.00050612236,0.0007614837,0.0010927265,0.0015277701,0.004340838,0.0007011734,0.0017512644,0.027752405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019700278,0.00041862446,0.00090205116,0.0012439372,0.0057626804,0.007920076,0.0021676775,0.0026084946,0.002360624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012152807,0.000030477788,0.0017219492,0.00009092524,0.000020650288,0.00006921108,0.0006650067,0.0009934173,0.00030525654,0.9752075,0.0017880047,0.018986212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031210464,0.000029801688,0.00090168347,0.000028770119,0.000011294897,0.00010871001,0.00017345589,0.0021845375,0.00019523328,0.98123896,0.015082783,0.00001364452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029521147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027229309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027752405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002414013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015400941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09284103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144442684","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.770964","title":"Ellsberg Revisited: An Experimental Study","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Mathematical economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.08411198479871994,"score_gpt":0.42033513956677365,"score_spread":0.3362231547680537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144442684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799698,0.0005354518,0.00091129995,0.00045482314,0.00009585183,0.000087463144,0.00009683476,0.000020400794,0.017828126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862322,0.0004688857,0.0011946213,0.00032425497,0.000059255322,0.00008055028,0.000115638846,0.000032560838,0.0114921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894625,0.00044406197,0.00006673748,0.00020938138,0.00017774984,0.0001558628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866763,0.010052456,0.0007911092,0.0016966214,0.00028826363,0.00049531634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003281125,0.00067838375,0.0020180081,0.00083880546,0.0019770768,0.0035270234,0.0011059048,0.0032626665,0.020176234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01708816,0.00038711965,0.00050941354,0.0008228007,0.0016537878,0.0023259085,0.001583535,0.002357096,0.0019635425],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.15811683,0.07373617,0.042410076,0.0028545035,0.001119946,0.007986132,0.029898414,0.014981511,0.07467095,0.32529956,0.02499158,0.24393435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.057333544,0.07738392,0.1060182,0.001426117,0.005187164,0.0052422183,0.052280944,0.10334173,0.05744218,0.4390753,0.094023004,0.0012457625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047896155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024822177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020176234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010048184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008237758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06749624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145230123","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2012.04.002","title":"Expected multi-utility representations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Subjective expected utility; Constructive; Mathematical economics; Utility theory; Von Neumann architecture; Regular polygon; Mathematics; Computer science; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.5449282112151731,"score_gpt":0.5456047661647843,"score_spread":0.0006765549496111634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145230123","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06790807,0.00055074034,0.9061062,0.0019047195,0.00009381422,0.000082708684,0.00071016466,0.0002259876,0.022417584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91506755,0.00062007055,0.07095008,0.00023145809,0.00016992459,0.00023106505,0.0006805981,0.00008515256,0.011964068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979335,0.0009905872,0.00010453425,0.00035939153,0.00035313232,0.0002588516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99247545,0.0051329746,0.0004954139,0.00087969494,0.0006816367,0.00033488055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035890432,0.0009417165,0.00093365443,0.0014580076,0.00041221944,0.0037174574,0.0017978238,0.0017214572,0.012615561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019987693,0.00047701967,0.0013602613,0.0014649126,0.0010399256,0.0072379047,0.0014705635,0.0025994368,0.0009061784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060487662,0.00006947139,0.0006504668,0.00006681877,0.000053576943,0.00009959367,0.0001510254,0.03972263,0.0002602149,0.9346259,0.0017569088,0.022482846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010277542,0.000023041172,0.00026503706,0.000023646318,0.00001692597,0.00006951438,0.000038112357,0.17938891,0.00015201607,0.8192727,0.0007276324,0.000012198111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006951175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005426431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012615561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001310368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063298363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042203248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147458801","doi":"10.1177/0886368707302528","title":"The Motivational Properties of Tangible Incentives","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Marketing; Public economics; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.23361074051291872,"score_gpt":0.3968952069892371,"score_spread":0.16328446647631836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147458801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46739203,0.008118759,0.0656293,0.039098408,0.00063676183,0.00092642417,0.0004513578,0.00012627985,0.41762075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860924,0.0014923133,0.005322789,0.0012241836,0.00022723884,0.00021347115,0.00003782304,0.0000118641055,0.005378018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966719,0.0019718683,0.00011983328,0.00018772908,0.00078306126,0.0002654701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.950264,0.03780922,0.006556111,0.0017014397,0.0022026615,0.0014666495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077298377,0.00031030388,0.00032565556,0.00096505595,0.00087791146,0.0021502185,0.00040554014,0.0011957814,0.013989741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0437322,0.00027206252,0.00041491073,0.0004742725,0.0025528446,0.0017342791,0.0011682198,0.0015162728,0.0006802204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080835196,0.0009970902,0.02459135,0.0014806523,0.00017110175,0.00019360967,0.0012315884,0.003159898,0.003035632,0.73670435,0.00523656,0.22238965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005162159,0.0024278746,0.11707532,0.0013190726,0.000339255,0.00064260646,0.0019518869,0.010831558,0.0039141667,0.79533195,0.06552137,0.00012862122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006975197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012017008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013989741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008805002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012827318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046800375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147624599","doi":"10.7202/602326ar","title":"L’importance de la procédure dans les choix de loteries","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.09819825367198326,"score_gpt":0.37676073834902857,"score_spread":0.2785624846770453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147624599","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0864172,0.0028453632,0.86906767,0.0050823707,0.0002148009,0.00021514797,0.0001087681,0.00015173033,0.035896916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5851924,0.002572712,0.39822242,0.0007900747,0.00030755537,0.0006614552,0.00010687417,0.00018337005,0.011963154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9805669,0.01339541,0.00091215444,0.0017063535,0.0029365513,0.00048261086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92282563,0.06333472,0.0037209645,0.005810294,0.003484044,0.0008243563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024820331,0.0007650046,0.0014738062,0.0015714729,0.0021430615,0.0053752675,0.0024525158,0.003019304,0.0077964286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06829174,0.00071390625,0.0022816479,0.0022151142,0.015400695,0.009364641,0.00279682,0.0051792976,0.0013346856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015201696,0.00008067972,0.0030663454,0.00034220782,0.000079348785,0.00009332958,0.0019366198,0.0067478446,0.0010671363,0.9305702,0.00073131156,0.055132996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007181399,0.00033383316,0.0038158644,0.00027968452,0.000046538837,0.00021055737,0.0006316863,0.03273294,0.0026178574,0.941249,0.017888341,0.00012178782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003021228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004009263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024820331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030951882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037371363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13126403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147664728","doi":"10.1287/mksc.1060.0254","title":"Zero as a Special Price: The True Value of Free Products","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marketing Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":612,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Zero (linguistics); Value (mathematics); Economics; Microeconomics; Affect (linguistics); Test (biology); Contrast (vision); Perspective (graphical); Set (abstract data type); Marketing; Business; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Psychology","score_opus":0.0584662893362493,"score_gpt":0.3772242976406483,"score_spread":0.318758008304399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147664728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9221086,0.0006646425,0.015164163,0.0014223699,0.00015798758,0.000061479404,0.00014687395,0.00008495857,0.06018892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960342,0.00009858466,0.0028468573,0.00021272163,0.000052163447,0.000018620907,0.000048131213,0.000019829886,0.000668859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996752,0.0013894951,0.00015335804,0.00058027625,0.0009708953,0.00015393287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682189,0.023642085,0.0027114542,0.0037158064,0.00084849546,0.0008632232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002778394,0.0004357051,0.0008521947,0.00059784885,0.00051258126,0.0025666666,0.0006219933,0.0014534696,0.011979201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030623816,0.0002893382,0.0006004969,0.00036889865,0.0029427833,0.004029526,0.0015251865,0.0018931456,0.0004548023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009911398,0.0032272192,0.19116506,0.0022090287,0.0010045933,0.0014069892,0.006391436,0.0066319513,0.091173455,0.35304442,0.005521729,0.32831272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008406665,0.004145337,0.50644755,0.00032676462,0.00087203155,0.002439201,0.0037603227,0.018976068,0.019271119,0.42797327,0.01464329,0.00030431218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034349348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003028934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011979201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004818789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021539051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040074408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148025462","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2014.976791","title":"The Statistical Developments and Applications Reference List","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality Assessment","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Library science; Behavioural sciences; Psychometrics; Applied psychology; Clinical psychology; Computer science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.15318348383866287,"score_gpt":0.4741059062348594,"score_spread":0.3209224223961965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148025462","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021972077,0.027789924,0.6151993,0.031247824,0.022764698,0.009138014,0.16560209,0.02169436,0.10436656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010180674,0.023363331,0.71795195,0.014520949,0.009613719,0.025870731,0.11330787,0.014924565,0.070266284],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.945176,0.027976148,0.009696398,0.0032252402,0.013149458,0.0007768197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73064154,0.1613052,0.010335744,0.025276795,0.07032817,0.0021126543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03595081,0.002006266,0.0023888007,0.015082768,0.0017740891,0.005454787,0.004311989,0.0035797139,0.16427712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31097278,0.0021489635,0.0026096448,0.020550368,0.0016269959,0.0050582797,0.0034751892,0.0089010885,0.14328668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012296179,0.00010964948,0.0008127313,0.00233656,0.00007093566,0.00008904549,0.00020760678,0.00058585807,0.00038890948,0.0146539975,0.7711628,0.2094589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059693808,0.00012558198,0.0015482075,0.0022037288,0.000065320295,0.00038137072,0.00008226416,0.001139661,0.00054915657,0.018671956,0.9751056,0.00006741789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003671595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003293183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16427712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002935086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0083503155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54956174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148104117","doi":"10.1177/1555343414554702","title":"Personality, Cognitive Style, Motivation, and Aptitude Predict Systematic Trends in Analytic Forecasting Behavior","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity; Interior Business Center; University of Toronto; U.S. Department of the Interior","keywords":"Aptitude; Psychology; Personality; Cognition; Big Five personality traits; Psychometrics; Cognitive style; Sample (material); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.08933300199234538,"score_gpt":0.36104520688486064,"score_spread":0.27171220489251524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148104117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99926573,0.000025169626,0.0002676546,0.000027193943,0.0000014596897,0.000003958108,0.00003095193,0.0000033128877,0.00037449898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948573,0.000023877936,0.00029529087,0.0000085466845,0.0000026375358,0.0000036401536,0.00007245861,0.0000010895795,0.00010678248],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964416,0.00016115238,0.000029822759,0.000045737976,0.00007363823,0.00004552795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985727,0.0079557095,0.0036920577,0.0011494892,0.00066044775,0.0008153147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022541615,0.00019598819,0.0001275767,0.0007210112,0.00018450498,0.0008704379,0.00016373675,0.00030017388,0.0013967901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015386002,0.00012265786,0.00031980002,0.0005494417,0.00034409144,0.0005580641,0.00041031544,0.0004954018,0.0002661559],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033349785,0.000063917105,0.993956,0.0000032216055,0.000031513395,0.000008902691,0.00018330284,0.00026770754,0.00022018712,0.00008372454,0.000037282094,0.005110843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019999836,0.00007814687,0.9968352,0.0000030361807,0.000009067672,0.000020458436,0.0001684793,0.0022466914,0.00012694074,0.00041491122,0.00009194105,0.0000031614609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020210096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030143375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022541615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001996522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002927107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011921287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148627868","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.08.003","title":"Wolves in sheep’s clothing: How and when hypothetical questions influence behavior","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Clothing; Social psychology; Elaboration; Consumption (sociology); Voting; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.10346009134150429,"score_gpt":0.3518660322923991,"score_spread":0.2484059409508948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148627868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966689,0.000046813442,0.00090630056,0.00017337294,0.0000040217606,0.000009508641,0.0000068543195,0.0000026624075,0.0021815198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990306,0.000032483047,0.0006430491,0.000055635654,0.0000025624295,0.000008045856,0.00001723744,0.0000029681191,0.00020749724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967188,0.0027293493,0.000065522,0.00019932917,0.00016554071,0.00012147563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96928126,0.026492147,0.0018695064,0.0011356185,0.0006150658,0.00060633186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034209948,0.00021771167,0.0002544517,0.00024005849,0.00047189038,0.0019148699,0.00029020262,0.0013705642,0.0025968787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03649338,0.00031378993,0.00028499876,0.00014807576,0.0012307621,0.0010464207,0.0005640822,0.0007127574,0.00024923205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045387666,0.003018623,0.83731025,0.0003712302,0.0007304308,0.00088859606,0.025162881,0.013978499,0.04183021,0.021911385,0.0014086273,0.048850488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018633084,0.001634538,0.8405995,0.00018668639,0.0005128139,0.00061562314,0.013848347,0.08572498,0.01103641,0.041690502,0.0038541935,0.00011003411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00144378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018268913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034209948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038957654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020898608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018092155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149255028","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01272.x","title":"Taking Workplace Decisions Seriously: This Conversation Has Been Fruitful!","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Conversation; Field (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.2565953050500834,"score_gpt":0.40951454955406413,"score_spread":0.15291924450398076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149255028","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012751148,0.0026209636,0.00089258794,0.94532585,0.04780932,0.000016062007,0.00007260204,0.00007153987,0.0019159603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037996404,0.0024260667,0.0022450816,0.9158432,0.03254412,0.00019143373,0.00008317877,0.00032762336,0.0083428705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9643405,0.023893263,0.0014840248,0.0025985294,0.0048221545,0.0028615696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8395456,0.093825854,0.008770728,0.005724059,0.03612823,0.016005483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0279224,0.0021013992,0.002060801,0.001262018,0.016201526,0.014321802,0.004053645,0.023645507,0.012020946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16479592,0.00081394543,0.0015399605,0.0024969142,0.012236439,0.01851549,0.011411489,0.050492566,0.005570765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011159226,0.000041039424,0.00042260526,0.0006707269,0.000037609105,0.00083127746,0.04681183,0.00007373329,0.0006091449,0.012888524,0.9272064,0.010295554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029285173,0.00006488728,0.0009615613,0.0015673176,0.000040301882,0.00082813465,0.097851336,0.00040042383,0.00066061557,0.009098299,0.88828397,0.00021377597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006966886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061253235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0279224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006679186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007683018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14766955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149442301","doi":"10.1080/02724980543000033","title":"It looks easy! Heuristics for combinatorial optimization problems","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Heuristic; Boundary (topology); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Simple (philosophy); Combinatorial optimization; Optimization problem; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12181949981586823,"score_gpt":0.4537068838271673,"score_spread":0.331887384011299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149442301","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09447688,0.014234821,0.75503325,0.023638476,0.00095767487,0.00037683526,0.00035495395,0.0018720255,0.10905509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46609604,0.0035725194,0.5207845,0.0021546558,0.00032140638,0.00031932988,0.00024929203,0.00031004992,0.006192125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810815,0.0011209135,0.000103716455,0.0001734704,0.00041243163,0.00008129215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98756254,0.009581592,0.0006145511,0.0015413985,0.00043060762,0.0002693101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030193354,0.00063735736,0.00053569145,0.00065857096,0.0006278989,0.00254701,0.00075000443,0.0011440951,0.0070221885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02531707,0.00043971173,0.00062369555,0.00078831695,0.0025229272,0.0052805324,0.0012927244,0.0020535442,0.001212078],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002559268,0.00016470792,0.00206906,0.0010791663,0.000090247166,0.00018453186,0.0008510489,0.03956943,0.0028449986,0.6676098,0.024372097,0.2609089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001017362,0.000117326024,0.0012384224,0.00026877667,0.00002665819,0.0002549288,0.0003456566,0.057174325,0.00096849515,0.9022498,0.03720099,0.00005283716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010082244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014517978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070221885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081026764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009750778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023491621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150168892","doi":"10.1177/0956797611421484","title":"On Assets and Debt in the Psychology of Perceived Wealth","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Association for Psychological Science; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Debt; Perception; Psychology; Function (biology); Net worth; Social psychology; Monetary economics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.37851987929346853,"score_gpt":0.5270128778227844,"score_spread":0.14849299852931586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150168892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908404,0.0007099801,0.0008515695,0.00068872096,0.000011491574,0.000007687096,0.000023742185,0.0000021056555,0.0068642464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990835,0.00036398342,0.00023526033,0.00013879473,0.000011607981,0.000006938816,0.000010567222,0.0000013529087,0.00014806386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906975,0.00063968473,0.000026551947,0.00006475415,0.00012795256,0.000071386996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98608345,0.010894159,0.0015198082,0.00032031437,0.0005072186,0.0006750311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026328908,0.00022184558,0.00028451116,0.0008629168,0.00042840707,0.0018624354,0.00019032383,0.0006499856,0.0021325112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012347876,0.00017859662,0.00023886557,0.0006987516,0.0024068512,0.0018572588,0.0008311602,0.0012932614,0.00012823739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014303603,0.0017503041,0.7106379,0.00054548203,0.0003945735,0.000851032,0.07969361,0.005090706,0.014628586,0.05401017,0.0019155536,0.1290517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048866194,0.0006065333,0.94156504,0.00012665913,0.00006232617,0.00031538308,0.015486422,0.0029207177,0.00041493503,0.036543332,0.001832339,0.00007746601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011048828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001390354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026328908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005106846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018740997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013924181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152123405","doi":"10.1037/a0022148","title":"Time is tight: How higher economic value of time increases feelings of time pressure.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs","keywords":"Feeling; Value of time; Scarcity; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Time value of money; Economics; Microeconomics; Travel time; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08846709901199876,"score_gpt":0.36313234096307656,"score_spread":0.2746652419510778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152123405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842316,0.0015096096,0.0014805319,0.001233085,0.00014984598,0.00003133869,0.000124372,0.000020622094,0.011218937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99772364,0.0003441166,0.00065253425,0.00040496374,0.000035335193,0.000040159564,0.000045196986,0.000006808241,0.0007472696],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993556,0.00034559862,0.000022734226,0.00008198348,0.00013836211,0.000055748576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962895,0.0018809934,0.0011213243,0.00015930059,0.000111957925,0.00043697946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009421222,0.0003367718,0.00020509642,0.00036630675,0.00040706852,0.001523198,0.00026167912,0.0009748353,0.0050241714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008486696,0.0002720467,0.0003211872,0.00032110943,0.001045588,0.0010913408,0.0008432829,0.0013124088,0.00026761674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0109378975,0.008090645,0.48198524,0.0029350254,0.0025398664,0.0023514647,0.07373247,0.0023615293,0.11037602,0.028072739,0.022173295,0.25444382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029274082,0.0030640743,0.9616227,0.0001944299,0.00043170442,0.0012892886,0.0124493595,0.0016298974,0.003206861,0.007885153,0.007778539,0.00015521598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046117837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008282303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050241714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003887059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018449214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016807497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152812298","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00099.x","title":"Decision‐Making: A Neuroeconomic Perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroeconomics; Irrationality; Perspective (graphical); Field (mathematics); Point (geometry); Epistemology; Positive economics; Psychology; Rationality; Behavioural economics; Economics; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1472587113847063,"score_gpt":0.4314207116274592,"score_spread":0.2841620002427529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152812298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053392194,0.046330146,0.31371644,0.109715804,0.0011706711,0.00011177158,0.00036831564,0.00010152384,0.4750932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94548666,0.015092694,0.025737638,0.0024434258,0.0010263525,0.00011203457,0.00007466785,0.000033361885,0.009993159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840564,0.00089043955,0.00005076134,0.00017648493,0.0003608229,0.00011584511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973621,0.0017810505,0.000158608,0.00014958259,0.0003592371,0.00018953119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00263438,0.0005449597,0.0005671897,0.0010612513,0.0007814107,0.004746594,0.0012421819,0.0021269408,0.0050885277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004757552,0.00027042397,0.0005171531,0.0009947489,0.0065757865,0.0049251877,0.0013099369,0.0028707215,0.0006419837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054728093,0.0000098937535,0.00010906232,0.000020298245,0.0000069996627,0.000017940714,0.000032911157,0.0047898265,0.000046592533,0.99240005,0.00045122526,0.0021096955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004049033,0.0000062218332,0.00013174392,0.000033261287,0.0000038503326,0.000018275721,0.000047894606,0.0076267603,0.00003873437,0.986375,0.005709467,0.0000049278306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022163128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015652864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050885277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036860558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019911323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026744306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152999879","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.960520","title":"Collective Risk Management in a Flight to Quality Episode","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Risk management; Quality (philosophy); Quality management; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations management; Economics; Finance; Management system; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06599872250646012,"score_gpt":0.4194888761972835,"score_spread":0.35349015369082337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152999879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923133,0.000039388236,0.0011749397,0.0022451123,0.000072203264,0.000025524403,0.000022124823,0.000016242164,0.0040913015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988218,0.0000105992085,0.00023235637,0.0000983703,0.00001376194,0.0000027981964,0.00001003375,0.0000017866815,0.0008083298],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937755,0.00019816282,0.000026193575,0.00007204068,0.00009929704,0.00022684623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996207,0.00093483366,0.0007671219,0.00024207722,0.00032119115,0.0015276074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014519929,0.0001436593,0.00030140497,0.00029356,0.0020866483,0.003246442,0.0003956849,0.0025773335,0.0050783767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008585274,0.000117927746,0.00028435496,0.00024808387,0.0006597303,0.000864736,0.0013812924,0.0018210758,0.00028975942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0055913352,0.005857111,0.60591596,0.00013044593,0.00049691653,0.012389185,0.032950412,0.042165726,0.011824269,0.13108297,0.026924625,0.1246711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000659831,0.0052517713,0.49357998,0.00015270128,0.00022962737,0.002262184,0.073147036,0.26443812,0.0019825997,0.13038337,0.027710715,0.00020210465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011704361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010996714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011704361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015620206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009871733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023272455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154576508","doi":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2013.08.002","title":"Consumer response to uncertain promotions: An empirical analysis of conditional rebates","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Universidad Carlos III de Madrid; Dartmouth College","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Receipt; Conditional probability; Conjoint analysis; Econometrics; Economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Marketing; Advertising; Microeconomics; Actuarial science; Business; Preference; Expected utility hypothesis; Statistics; Financial economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.35382856606715946,"score_gpt":0.5903400542026845,"score_spread":0.23651148813552508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154576508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957112,0.00026756103,0.0019797888,0.0002131265,0.000018353345,0.00006932176,0.00025430592,0.00003851334,0.0014478029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980551,0.00008271278,0.00052004686,0.000059813632,0.000029433846,0.000027277132,0.0003195869,0.00001782679,0.00088828884],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969541,0.0015315533,0.0001652299,0.00048471577,0.00042722226,0.0004372401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7460937,0.23001628,0.013224554,0.0058600185,0.002748823,0.0020566355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011843808,0.0006856217,0.001404734,0.00081537996,0.000468235,0.0021026013,0.0019435569,0.0026764951,0.0124394735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0775373,0.00069799717,0.0017438751,0.000807052,0.0013313454,0.002445196,0.0010495606,0.004428956,0.0011491254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06904849,0.011029201,0.5270874,0.0015467878,0.0022538623,0.0011518437,0.0021430987,0.26666966,0.014530395,0.025542269,0.004991348,0.07400565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008071807,0.005256424,0.5422811,0.00013586009,0.0013525793,0.0005298815,0.0011071656,0.426468,0.0035433148,0.016529894,0.0016771462,0.00031144213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044867913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030107284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0124394735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013520463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062200555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06263685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154772733","doi":"10.1002/bdm.617","title":"A behavioral account of compensation awarding decisions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Value (mathematics); Object (grammar); Economics; Microeconomics; Zero (linguistics); Actuarial science; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.27258908242826174,"score_gpt":0.46125417756629405,"score_spread":0.1886650951380323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154772733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3746211,0.0009916129,0.124919765,0.022613542,0.00032632303,0.0002318357,0.00042249338,0.00017908897,0.47569424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885599,0.00019506324,0.004145519,0.0009057456,0.00009915509,0.000053198553,0.00006804121,0.000016942045,0.0059564672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970386,0.0015756576,0.00013486018,0.00029283355,0.00065283384,0.0003051976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922788,0.0037304112,0.0015084669,0.00086855586,0.0010344584,0.0005793275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040509026,0.00068175857,0.0003770136,0.0010327726,0.0010506945,0.0030765643,0.00086054724,0.0026238656,0.016341968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014497024,0.0002995201,0.00047754424,0.0007130774,0.002807761,0.002887337,0.0012473245,0.0024983862,0.0009331377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020967463,0.00052539725,0.015126277,0.00014447357,0.00010453376,0.00027405782,0.0010181882,0.017749568,0.0020209907,0.9287732,0.004222227,0.029831473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010362102,0.00013797695,0.01543678,0.00007576883,0.000061476676,0.00019535384,0.00076244347,0.053524304,0.0007422454,0.9189268,0.0099846665,0.000048575694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025239775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023404108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016341968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023927505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011832933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05466926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158027157","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1110.1429","title":"A Case-Based Model of Probability and Pricing Judgments: Biases in Buying and Selling Uncertainty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Econometrics; Economics; Heuristics; Odds; Bayes' theorem; Valuation (finance); Microeconomics; Actuarial science; Bayesian probability; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4098736491539777,"score_gpt":0.3833561576868238,"score_spread":0.02651749146715393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158027157","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11024779,0.00051627285,0.8445948,0.006137804,0.00013153268,0.00024468612,0.00023204954,0.00012786854,0.03776728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87941504,0.00047075388,0.11363542,0.0002805175,0.00017059091,0.00029104325,0.0001229073,0.000029364768,0.005584357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947502,0.0028196601,0.00028205168,0.00065525394,0.0011531904,0.0003395298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97375554,0.020183844,0.0021184166,0.0016755003,0.0015425249,0.000724103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007965705,0.00061776413,0.000813926,0.0021254485,0.00079238956,0.0054249004,0.0027749226,0.0023304005,0.0071786116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035741866,0.00072718575,0.0014380813,0.0018397314,0.004421786,0.0074429177,0.0017415208,0.0021237028,0.00076614233],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012271146,0.00017025086,0.004027976,0.000077394616,0.00008679532,0.00045128103,0.0012969197,0.109034926,0.000794787,0.8643305,0.00093320076,0.018673314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004431259,0.000055123197,0.0009857634,0.00002632243,0.00003558485,0.00022082169,0.00010625832,0.38205642,0.00018051686,0.6148981,0.0013551811,0.000035607016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003100907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016043283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007965705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001966727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001353822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042127132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158925497","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0004362","title":"Genetic Determinants of Financial Risk Taking","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Alliance for Cancer Gene Therapy; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Allele; Financial risk; Addiction; Genetics; Anxiety; Gene; Psychology; Biology; Economics; Finance; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.20363823246645943,"score_gpt":0.36753531630156705,"score_spread":0.16389708383510762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158925497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989083,0.000078288555,0.0001448297,0.000099414014,0.0000029369958,0.0000020975215,0.00004421891,0.000001728912,0.0007181966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997056,0.000029467654,0.000090693036,0.00002098466,0.0000022292224,0.0000013386789,0.000030744308,5.0712197e-7,0.00011831276],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961996,0.00016887118,0.00002403365,0.00006313813,0.00005962209,0.00006429665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847037,0.00074492866,0.00045532882,0.00009945889,0.000055705357,0.00017428832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005271673,0.00017416877,0.00016836339,0.00042895938,0.00018858229,0.0004761928,0.00010929629,0.0004360618,0.0023766297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028581861,0.00009156775,0.00023696465,0.00037600435,0.00028537997,0.00018233409,0.00027735822,0.000478875,0.00016958643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013425239,0.00014450631,0.98737144,0.000009482973,0.00019453463,0.0003300535,0.00019456247,0.0003137237,0.001857977,0.0006275156,0.0001180717,0.008703805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000410648,0.000066730274,0.9977816,0.0000042053616,0.000031506544,0.00038576513,0.00011446167,0.0004587899,0.00016523118,0.00080764014,0.00017407075,0.0000059121576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013195028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015340983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023766297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103566425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009994442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007950544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159196754","doi":"10.1287/deca.1070.0094","title":"Analysis of the Biological Clock Decision","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Analysis","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"AGE-WELL","keywords":"Function (biology); Quality of life (healthcare); Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13803290465819482,"score_gpt":0.4382528561120483,"score_spread":0.3002199514538535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159196754","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32044432,0.003948322,0.5645553,0.011483085,0.00045949887,0.00019808993,0.0014289117,0.00018260162,0.09729984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9584998,0.001768731,0.023554794,0.00028991615,0.000110172805,0.00014943941,0.0002387969,0.000034185872,0.015354242],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879694,0.00068059005,0.000025457719,0.00014874594,0.00012992101,0.00021834813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949739,0.0040800106,0.00039531582,0.000107748536,0.0002017253,0.00024124139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024402728,0.000532893,0.0008672589,0.0007263709,0.0005339844,0.0021473917,0.001019856,0.0015055406,0.011464927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011132984,0.00035822383,0.0009582827,0.0008792376,0.0012762643,0.002040841,0.0009043791,0.0013436339,0.0005883945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015607318,0.0000585758,0.0030981633,0.00008615513,0.00007898684,0.0001967437,0.0001434919,0.50016326,0.00040655825,0.4811374,0.0020375843,0.012437058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044558514,0.0000688185,0.0015142182,0.00002574696,0.00003797483,0.00005584819,0.00017459443,0.82572937,0.00013915649,0.1686915,0.0034906652,0.00002748576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009839398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051677534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011464927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029466602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002005867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03835398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159425318","doi":"10.7202/1021504ar","title":"La valeur psychologique du temps : une synthèse de la littérature","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05972069598088731,"score_gpt":0.3598605995205902,"score_spread":0.3001399035397029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159425318","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041057546,0.62925345,0.17560433,0.02035916,0.0053010127,0.00030216147,0.0035297507,0.0004108208,0.12418173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23044418,0.63720405,0.09712675,0.00507538,0.004123635,0.00070665556,0.0032902143,0.0010543532,0.020974806],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936978,0.0028023329,0.0007684073,0.00094389427,0.0016368133,0.00015069994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92576945,0.06405145,0.002594863,0.002494751,0.0047832364,0.00030626627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009162589,0.0013896346,0.001720865,0.010923739,0.0014166719,0.0066676866,0.0011333606,0.0016441325,0.022590011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046166163,0.00090175646,0.0016893157,0.011199308,0.0036714152,0.009949792,0.0020993643,0.0041909115,0.0035096987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022690005,0.00019880294,0.009315335,0.014590968,0.00055482285,0.00033072438,0.0073150136,0.0046012644,0.002018292,0.29306504,0.020672143,0.64711064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030124098,0.00021215061,0.017621033,0.027715862,0.0004999488,0.0012053611,0.0046175974,0.0027633593,0.0036643948,0.13357317,0.80788374,0.00021323256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063914084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005376524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022590011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036577361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049729384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07557112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159861263","doi":"10.3758/s13423-011-0057-1","title":"Magnitude comparison revisited: An alternative approach to binary choice under uncertainty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Psychology; Probabilistic logic; Task (project management); Magnitude (astronomy); Cognitive psychology; Focus (optics); Binary number; Process (computing); Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Arithmetic; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.3361898231911778,"score_gpt":0.45171437028887135,"score_spread":0.11552454709769355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159861263","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038942847,0.0055869687,0.9121917,0.015353075,0.0028996894,0.00023046082,0.0002983511,0.00016284369,0.02433399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7014667,0.0029466085,0.27910537,0.0047306386,0.0033875303,0.00076869404,0.00017656559,0.00017158393,0.0072463755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799227,0.013029995,0.00082321523,0.002282984,0.0034342369,0.0005067809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91530216,0.0746399,0.0027896983,0.0038187096,0.0024744496,0.0009751021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026209539,0.0011391965,0.0030109314,0.0028714887,0.0009147035,0.0063242125,0.0037263897,0.0040884735,0.013505593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1219092,0.00053625746,0.0023981174,0.0037759535,0.0047339443,0.012559489,0.0031553423,0.006994526,0.0005607279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006498165,0.00010632807,0.0012814801,0.0004723162,0.00021952661,0.0001298331,0.00041245943,0.002488496,0.0010013334,0.9059924,0.002196991,0.085049085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008923007,0.0001033356,0.0006183219,0.00007905248,0.00006483849,0.00010470516,0.000068165966,0.012732966,0.00026741353,0.98256034,0.0032744494,0.00003717088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005807345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066143327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026209539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015482294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015697993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1386109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160048429","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9779.2008.00394.x","title":"<scp>The Repugnant Conclusion and Utilitarianism under Domain Restrictions</scp>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Economics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Bounded function; Subsistence agriculture; Population; Consumption (sociology); Mathematics; Biology; Ecology; Philosophy; Demography; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13074083856109545,"score_gpt":0.346102418429089,"score_spread":0.21536157986799356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160048429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39699566,0.0011966316,0.35569024,0.026129905,0.00030910072,0.00018515161,0.00038905215,0.00011483329,0.21898952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98173803,0.0002052561,0.014921183,0.00071435346,0.00012540606,0.00009773342,0.00006888167,0.000022047292,0.0021071066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99087757,0.0050630546,0.00047457992,0.0014245595,0.001527458,0.0006328218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96641636,0.022586511,0.0028755208,0.003889205,0.0032744438,0.000957842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01312019,0.0003198366,0.0011226957,0.00093293196,0.0013860367,0.0034095175,0.0016091296,0.0020667885,0.0034855388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025435463,0.0003092793,0.001180205,0.00069057866,0.012837175,0.0047409344,0.0030371335,0.004663881,0.0003591736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003056738,0.000023770144,0.00045791685,0.000048988586,0.00002531458,0.00009643118,0.00020314676,0.0039364016,0.00022019366,0.9904551,0.00089176354,0.003610384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012701058,0.000021378602,0.00026116747,0.000025903833,0.000004920545,0.00004950474,0.00009375705,0.007981987,0.0002028945,0.9899047,0.0014331031,0.000007933958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082790834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052633585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01312019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020763397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011278872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06938702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160791614","doi":"","title":"The Effect of an Additional Alternative on Measured Risk Preferences in a Laboratory Experiment in Peru","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University; Johns Hopkins University; Brown University","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Test (biology); Chose; Psychology; Econometrics; Economics; Demography; Geography; Sociology; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.06328413792776501,"score_gpt":0.3428289377699449,"score_spread":0.2795447998421799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160791614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99899906,0.00003507117,0.00039752762,0.00004505439,0.000003368343,0.000016604692,0.000017246433,0.0000067782494,0.00047928467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962936,0.00007517936,0.0028320774,0.00008194285,0.000010225878,0.00009233939,0.00006265956,0.000009115004,0.00054284337],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751806,0.0014997176,0.00012398172,0.0003394546,0.0003768077,0.00014191792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882989,0.008027103,0.0016515404,0.0010594386,0.00028549004,0.00067751587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016372631,0.00088461686,0.0009055406,0.00045486755,0.00064460374,0.0013716585,0.0007698558,0.0013774395,0.0043497817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008386114,0.0004913812,0.00047680622,0.00039360917,0.0011423081,0.0008398387,0.0017492115,0.0016664729,0.00028058686],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05151673,0.02704217,0.10185957,0.0011392628,0.00074906927,0.0014344945,0.004438554,0.0049191453,0.76037186,0.0025708636,0.0006131852,0.043345075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063108345,0.20273525,0.5274377,0.00030828646,0.0013015887,0.0024832315,0.004750188,0.040923852,0.19135618,0.0136127975,0.008069345,0.0007107998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089078123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016010443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043497817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004102276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030681794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014551401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161077460","doi":"10.20982/tqmp.02.1.p001","title":"An Introduction to Model Selection: Tools and Algorithms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Algorithm; Machine learning","score_opus":0.39920512981782014,"score_gpt":0.6268989075808892,"score_spread":0.22769377776306904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161077460","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031134379,0.03018684,0.960172,0.0028386065,0.0007280174,0.00006276827,0.00047256696,0.00096937123,0.0042585046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023347378,0.049251385,0.90953404,0.002613449,0.005721691,0.0010496657,0.001240203,0.0010368926,0.006205316],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547786,0.0027872692,0.00032442244,0.0004896148,0.00081923214,0.000101684505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97958297,0.017995374,0.00048350292,0.0010009598,0.00072404457,0.00021317598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006571159,0.003471847,0.002962512,0.003567152,0.00078118854,0.0035727425,0.00289592,0.003699232,0.013069462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027660152,0.0017221703,0.0028067334,0.005583715,0.0021390233,0.0046797073,0.0027258056,0.007761249,0.00850237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006713177,0.00015951421,0.0012268227,0.0020029359,0.00057431526,0.00031581556,0.0002701043,0.08845898,0.00084919174,0.37875578,0.13228607,0.39503333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000361551,0.000048438258,0.000286494,0.000386968,0.00004748091,0.00025017446,0.00003315495,0.08130887,0.00027762362,0.8297364,0.08750648,0.00008165374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015028664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014636354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013069462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012604803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014152762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043721676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162793682","doi":"10.7202/1027909ar","title":"Dual-process theory et résolution de problèmes additifs de comparaison par des étudiants universitaires","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éducation et francophonie","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07171104742290241,"score_gpt":0.38157115671509606,"score_spread":0.30986010929219365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162793682","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32728285,0.0053933267,0.6149563,0.008241915,0.0006840547,0.0014289403,0.0010519095,0.00039039017,0.040570315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73638844,0.0010347663,0.24966662,0.000639183,0.00020573339,0.002112089,0.0006672465,0.00013783178,0.009147972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9333697,0.044577263,0.0033566488,0.007744069,0.009619886,0.0013324656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79440725,0.16570896,0.015249253,0.010667247,0.012145999,0.0018211564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0550477,0.0013612743,0.0025385078,0.0049721436,0.003385707,0.012013965,0.003999321,0.0029420808,0.015753973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20961915,0.0010355514,0.0033039248,0.00870305,0.0046706833,0.010414863,0.0072278525,0.0053808964,0.0010574285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017404971,0.0009223403,0.0793155,0.0029155626,0.0018179157,0.00074668584,0.030894889,0.021418016,0.0025505207,0.5105882,0.004009445,0.3430804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061314576,0.0013389812,0.042800702,0.0010539565,0.0013401367,0.00065114006,0.021666914,0.114333086,0.006729611,0.7466074,0.06257592,0.00028895208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073546492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0550477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071533374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069414186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29112357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162873672","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.091546","title":"Rainy weather and medical school admission interviews","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Mood; Medical school; Cognition; Medical education; Psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.048817502883090134,"score_gpt":0.36723198068723,"score_spread":0.3184144778041399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162873672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99133635,0.00008335906,0.00030852435,0.000455282,0.000036503247,0.00031502044,0.00088405545,0.000007595298,0.0065732016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955782,0.00011937495,0.0007839286,0.00023318468,0.000041868232,0.00037614777,0.0005707348,0.000004201826,0.002292292],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974451,0.0013590078,0.0001611723,0.00013235804,0.00035048623,0.0005518525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99163365,0.002647953,0.0018227585,0.00026354357,0.0014498506,0.0021823086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002632947,0.0001867651,0.0003274341,0.0013002544,0.0026283218,0.0011454718,0.00032990825,0.0005284965,0.0047233654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012119279,0.00022697367,0.0002674708,0.0014431216,0.00077409425,0.00029549416,0.0012961635,0.00095622236,0.0004020555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017653436,0.00069591345,0.85237306,0.0001906002,0.000078763675,0.00079380965,0.100471035,0.00053341023,0.0039027305,0.0008240154,0.0057948804,0.032576535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026688935,0.00018676613,0.9548084,0.000037187412,0.000014004936,0.000034420886,0.039577007,0.00020676301,0.000505818,0.0001639955,0.0044029737,0.00003596362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1774902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44944024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1774902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033464164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027711473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3529142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162895624","doi":"10.1016/j.beproc.2006.09.007","title":"The consequences of surrendering a degree of freedom to the participant in a contingency assessment task","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioural Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Psychology; Task (project management); Outcome (game theory); Contingency management; Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Variety (cybernetics); Contingency table; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Intervention (counseling)","score_opus":0.3159016008127257,"score_gpt":0.42280831898949006,"score_spread":0.10690671817676434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162895624","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99524516,0.000023531982,0.0020675675,0.00019492101,0.000060783244,0.000060903232,0.000022650309,0.000019310308,0.002305199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976342,0.000019977928,0.0019086438,0.000047726284,0.000011427785,0.000030539082,0.000024861887,0.0000069170774,0.00031572432],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981025,0.0008398362,0.00016161356,0.00021256063,0.00043596688,0.00024758105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96481055,0.02840355,0.002149595,0.0017497671,0.00062403345,0.0022624123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038903719,0.00041176722,0.0004120246,0.00028404497,0.00069991325,0.001266889,0.00060379226,0.001855588,0.0038405003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04180891,0.00030058998,0.0002858009,0.00023008294,0.0008591003,0.0008772267,0.00092853257,0.0016090669,0.00020185113],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.09885337,0.01332989,0.22378176,0.0008924931,0.0006371773,0.0037325944,0.007781791,0.057456937,0.3693613,0.04467897,0.0036128706,0.17588094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003477323,0.029676858,0.57412434,0.00036866043,0.0008650828,0.0018808774,0.0061822115,0.18886179,0.07257101,0.116294205,0.0049521,0.0007455481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013092377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025517144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038903719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032817572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010139854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02057445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162944011","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-937x.2005.00339.x","title":"A Bayesian Approach to Uncertainty Aversion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bayesian probability; Economics; Library science; Positive economics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.19577125160444472,"score_gpt":0.44144546834073956,"score_spread":0.24567421673629483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162944011","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03123534,0.007194421,0.84234095,0.019916395,0.0003217424,0.00008150843,0.000219781,0.00007509186,0.09861472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85232574,0.009398079,0.12222407,0.0026922105,0.0012618818,0.00029212944,0.0001130677,0.000036420206,0.01165646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996176,0.0021115916,0.00016944711,0.00041678088,0.00089996425,0.00022624247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920368,0.0059156204,0.00068983244,0.00043626642,0.0006892019,0.0002321966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005132005,0.0008781797,0.00090546854,0.0017323787,0.00084571756,0.003178701,0.001328734,0.0024083033,0.0040224055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017541511,0.00060323573,0.0009430651,0.0012794738,0.004758189,0.0058401185,0.002330323,0.0046101413,0.00044287933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059047366,0.000011260562,0.00018926547,0.000032045853,0.000019633206,0.00005584884,0.0001105807,0.00446108,0.00010950148,0.98905796,0.00056653045,0.0053803716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003567658,0.000004697144,0.00009622169,0.000018937528,0.000005118775,0.000029328723,0.000017209286,0.00515723,0.000031367814,0.9935388,0.001091973,0.0000054081797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001901064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015351395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005132005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020399166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012753493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027140975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163382546","doi":"10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00137-8","title":"Wisdom and aging: irrational preferences in college students but not older adults","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Psychology; Irrational number; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.11816549674905466,"score_gpt":0.39717008254632136,"score_spread":0.2790045857972667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163382546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992841,0.000101472804,0.000021852704,0.00009969983,0.000006323925,0.0000019538568,0.000017393226,0.0000010441101,0.00046629348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999602,0.000064300344,0.000039714876,0.00007865886,0.000009119258,0.0000018361712,0.00002893099,0.0000011781816,0.00017426249],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996505,0.00007395462,0.000049484108,0.00006658573,0.0000937701,0.000065688335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99245113,0.0022925276,0.003061679,0.0006298258,0.0003390161,0.0012256389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014536773,0.00044160345,0.000628906,0.001130192,0.0006383005,0.0023038303,0.00031578142,0.0013124045,0.002917446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011006718,0.00030562445,0.0003735185,0.0006759482,0.0012137452,0.0014946659,0.00071113446,0.0012883971,0.00029247245],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000972522,0.0008262023,0.9838855,0.000030377869,0.000110928406,0.00040790695,0.0023144386,0.00012404309,0.0014745049,0.00045094016,0.00026040163,0.009142196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004233635,0.00030720342,0.9941643,0.000009074694,0.000064681924,0.0005495988,0.0015054462,0.0003749652,0.0002523492,0.0024477693,0.00026119297,0.000021102558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031166123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049514524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031166123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035316558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036637957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009759784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163442724","doi":"10.1142/s0217590805002104","title":"THE APPROPRIATE CHOICE OF VALUATION MEASURE IN USUAL CASES OF LOSSES VALUED MORE THAN GAINS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Singapore Economic Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Valuation (finance); Econometrics; Economics; Variation (astronomy); Value (mathematics); Statistics; Mathematics; Actuarial science; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.2989379139337575,"score_gpt":0.45627615114369036,"score_spread":0.15733823720993284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163442724","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12015901,0.005362724,0.718276,0.014227075,0.0021595377,0.0006793613,0.0010770239,0.000246304,0.13781299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.787454,0.0027418123,0.20112127,0.0010019902,0.00049045106,0.0009378446,0.00025937907,0.00009445175,0.0058988486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99091876,0.005197821,0.0009312543,0.00072156853,0.0019745023,0.00025602512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98988426,0.006053043,0.0010424693,0.0012567783,0.0014857999,0.0002776405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013379273,0.0007149411,0.0009448062,0.0020459478,0.0007302674,0.0038552317,0.0010827824,0.0018287392,0.0045767743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050033763,0.0002051293,0.00071509107,0.0025685863,0.003621429,0.0073911594,0.001899324,0.002273969,0.0010151264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002253872,0.00014864573,0.0041159545,0.00048721724,0.00011935139,0.00022207663,0.0014508953,0.0024504315,0.0023633162,0.8538385,0.007310646,0.12726754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007086288,0.00027635245,0.0071353074,0.0005177159,0.00009245902,0.00047919992,0.0019523018,0.0056150756,0.0026060073,0.9409409,0.040179353,0.00013439025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034077745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045338905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013379273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011155375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006065022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07075721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163508470","doi":"10.1177/0956797610369493","title":"Physical Contact and Financial Risk Taking","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Finance; Business","score_opus":0.12954184770145097,"score_gpt":0.4768079337914606,"score_spread":0.34726608609000964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163508470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934894,0.00026944478,0.00070740475,0.00021568168,0.000009552784,0.000012995452,0.000018023207,0.0000032825264,0.0052741757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99917525,0.00009190262,0.00027158117,0.00003124564,0.0000066239213,0.000008738424,0.0000078381245,7.0688446e-7,0.00040599194],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993375,0.0003461054,0.000033925855,0.00007755388,0.0001298367,0.000075047246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99293935,0.00383184,0.0022574118,0.00031746822,0.00013168414,0.0005221841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008224318,0.00030687233,0.00020349857,0.00025171638,0.0004480255,0.001086188,0.00016408577,0.0006057269,0.009602756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006796972,0.0001057657,0.00024124037,0.00014488517,0.00059338374,0.0005300761,0.0009384825,0.00062158535,0.00036830758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004558727,0.009461833,0.68630487,0.00115869,0.0005769235,0.0026385977,0.010648294,0.0020263481,0.051190887,0.018379996,0.0013541556,0.21170065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015974301,0.005552137,0.950204,0.00018130869,0.00025259148,0.0023526554,0.004093255,0.003901098,0.009953246,0.018934112,0.004323945,0.000091907394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030824813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035679562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009602756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018086006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017263048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0321244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163612855","doi":"10.1177/0956797611407933","title":"Banking on a Bad Bet","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Matching (statistics); Task (project management); Econometrics; Cognition; Social psychology; Statistics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.49187082861120285,"score_gpt":0.5132829181339926,"score_spread":0.02141208952278978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163612855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8717646,0.00080546143,0.014655832,0.0068723722,0.00061871414,0.00013330142,0.00030432385,0.0003403275,0.104504995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985104,0.00018233426,0.0018186191,0.0011737763,0.00008246722,0.000026368214,0.00008143737,0.000033999437,0.011497031],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868053,0.0005576405,0.000084685955,0.00021452934,0.00030766038,0.00015504254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924021,0.0039051136,0.0011055169,0.0012254616,0.00057215657,0.0007896729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029628726,0.00029459147,0.00072823255,0.0006192506,0.0010875273,0.002308425,0.0004101207,0.0015585611,0.024848804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021985881,0.00020278557,0.00022222982,0.0004480099,0.001073544,0.002147825,0.0011370486,0.0014744553,0.0038434656],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007013401,0.0022841932,0.17465831,0.0003580787,0.00042260232,0.0016288284,0.0027272028,0.011856384,0.024880335,0.22344069,0.07354276,0.47718725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049129745,0.0025955648,0.2197775,0.00032247312,0.00040836597,0.004294128,0.0038326106,0.12216414,0.014361165,0.5099377,0.12153588,0.0002791081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007059264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007326325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024848804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005819263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042914075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0831275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165760983","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9779.2006.00260.x","title":"<scp>Welfare Economics with Intransitive Revealed Preferences: A Theory of the Endowment Effect</scp>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Normative; Endowment; Welfare; Endowment effect; Microeconomics; Rationality; Econometrics","score_opus":0.041006775258459416,"score_gpt":0.2864494477156988,"score_spread":0.24544267245723939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165760983","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1796958,0.0009176228,0.74321973,0.019905427,0.00021328461,0.00009177178,0.0003183747,0.00017479951,0.055463273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770612,0.00057169935,0.01902017,0.0004924283,0.00014500192,0.000081948434,0.000041851774,0.000020839465,0.0025647334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809796,0.0012846708,0.00006162728,0.00014912785,0.00028076506,0.00012577935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98984164,0.006397465,0.0014350743,0.0012846991,0.0007274517,0.00031367166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004851334,0.00046084303,0.0006788636,0.0008522641,0.000527583,0.0029097865,0.0009276925,0.0011934851,0.0036182355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013994111,0.00035312437,0.0008115855,0.00071525323,0.004742372,0.0051074983,0.0014132425,0.0017139366,0.00029792578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020994099,0.000034553424,0.0007537189,0.00003407045,0.000027995375,0.00005246596,0.00006960826,0.023357598,0.00015389032,0.97101307,0.0010616204,0.0034203883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074146237,0.0000103140455,0.00033087595,0.000012562018,0.0000063230586,0.000019927596,0.000021973896,0.061363235,0.00007346872,0.937744,0.00040422793,0.000005647681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012709341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088046864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004851334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002159546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079001655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02565658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165868536","doi":"10.1002/bdm.645","title":"Goal attainment as a resource: The cushion effect in risky choice above a goal","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Salient; Resource (disambiguation); Goal pursuit; Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05689584315870033,"score_gpt":0.43832850563218967,"score_spread":0.38143266247348934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165868536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9615254,0.00054324465,0.008292886,0.0011502925,0.000029474919,0.000038584687,0.000041646173,0.000035156623,0.028343309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983734,0.00007292011,0.00090255,0.00006772722,0.00000878093,0.000013966308,0.000010701601,0.000005372427,0.00054458535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988122,0.0006431486,0.00003366032,0.00015384688,0.00021840457,0.00013871257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98032147,0.01365982,0.0029430331,0.0010059736,0.00045942547,0.0016102793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027220063,0.00039817186,0.00052944163,0.0006626772,0.00062246894,0.0016856012,0.00035575745,0.0008656155,0.0070981085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0145023875,0.00030503032,0.00049831404,0.00051110954,0.0023062187,0.0011952884,0.002122136,0.0017403573,0.00022950387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045215795,0.0019308516,0.45667428,0.00064179156,0.0007034344,0.0019113254,0.008723135,0.024328532,0.020199224,0.36751252,0.0039517977,0.10890157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029115225,0.0013502667,0.71080583,0.00024967064,0.0006867285,0.0006911417,0.0024260525,0.04701174,0.0037543785,0.22543052,0.0071068704,0.00019567291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023386967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029221075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070981085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000985441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006373756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023745537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167366201","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x00003435","title":"Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4225,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Heuristics; Construal level theory; Rationality; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Axiom; Task (project management); Norm (philosophy); Computational model; Rational analysis; Social psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3357910294845187,"score_gpt":0.45758631628237123,"score_spread":0.12179528679785251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167366201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76910377,0.017002389,0.03824403,0.105207324,0.00083393464,0.00016322905,0.0005611428,0.0002443838,0.06863973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850699,0.0019441555,0.006378557,0.004361088,0.00042644367,0.000064393804,0.0001168401,0.00004941997,0.0015893443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.988189,0.005557431,0.00047005888,0.0027156204,0.0025315974,0.00053634716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9217997,0.05643617,0.0055596214,0.011712657,0.0028672814,0.0016245465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022921296,0.00050809595,0.0011475437,0.0010414093,0.0006276799,0.0031410886,0.0023337544,0.0029301208,0.005049655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08199786,0.00031788074,0.00068031834,0.0012648731,0.010125903,0.005474781,0.0023726241,0.0032806091,0.0005815812],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024982507,0.0015701165,0.13450466,0.0006794978,0.0014016816,0.0007739167,0.019719489,0.0073996056,0.00493335,0.5388164,0.008592582,0.27911043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001876406,0.00034486988,0.15296498,0.00015743254,0.00011635036,0.0004041404,0.0035561502,0.0041774693,0.0013590372,0.8251957,0.011398873,0.0001373248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022166218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013932184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022921296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092840736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008355384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12122083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167539968","doi":"10.1017/s0266267109990010","title":"EXTERNAL NORMS AND RATIONALITY OF CHOICE","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalizability; Axiom; Rationality; Mathematical economics; Norm (philosophy); Preference theory; Preference; Economics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Microeconomics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12191257713421992,"score_gpt":0.37260557742137373,"score_spread":0.2506930002871538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167539968","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092003755,0.0037006796,0.59845257,0.021736054,0.00048153204,0.00015185306,0.00014168429,0.0001738376,0.28315806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95547825,0.0010880713,0.035983354,0.0010287676,0.0003106366,0.00022505692,0.000054444823,0.00004598139,0.005785557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98210424,0.011141259,0.0008074266,0.0018731277,0.0033387556,0.0007351699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783741,0.012610885,0.0017989912,0.0036172923,0.0030827445,0.0005159136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015455532,0.00061344384,0.0008554877,0.001556238,0.0013644047,0.004558132,0.001266956,0.0021664032,0.002259572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023210969,0.00031582298,0.0010289786,0.0013194217,0.022600185,0.006074254,0.0036138783,0.0038429562,0.00031675838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000586979,0.0000041588205,0.000105852225,0.000014067981,0.000007880187,0.000008987585,0.00015374276,0.0006362337,0.000051771007,0.9969708,0.00013184808,0.0019087949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056522445,0.000005157128,0.000078011646,0.000014154639,0.0000030536587,0.000008030517,0.000045479974,0.0013120999,0.000086313965,0.9963846,0.002053416,0.0000040097993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011360206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072915683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015455532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030255127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022741172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08173764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168460233","doi":"10.1348/000711009x480640","title":"Coping with stress through decisional control: Quantification of negotiating the environment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Coping (psychology); Negotiation; Cognition; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Hierarchy; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.08798309826525118,"score_gpt":0.40092374668028197,"score_spread":0.3129406484150308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168460233","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17084393,0.0012496287,0.7756175,0.002389506,0.00008751292,0.00010815393,0.00016102691,0.000112960515,0.049429756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622625,0.00041027484,0.035889756,0.000047770736,0.00003576031,0.00008766128,0.000038638354,0.000016222266,0.0012113004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998201,0.0009299904,0.000081864324,0.00021949038,0.00036381665,0.00020387545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959925,0.0021841887,0.0007391108,0.0004790822,0.00030173268,0.00030348555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034666164,0.0008853101,0.00047840487,0.00093335065,0.0007527798,0.004788863,0.0012634781,0.0010241786,0.0030719186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010100103,0.0003114099,0.00072901166,0.0009015494,0.005702251,0.006078977,0.0027770228,0.0013593956,0.00021576666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007890553,0.00008638501,0.0026064538,0.000122052865,0.000061019186,0.00007961318,0.0008529333,0.12157788,0.0017717961,0.8523217,0.00040109342,0.020040153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009263795,0.00008829393,0.0015457891,0.000043837026,0.000021259242,0.000038172377,0.0004549108,0.25877988,0.0005559658,0.7367322,0.0016959832,0.00003445428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019583362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012714948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004788863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020396945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001323105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018333435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169258761","doi":"10.1177/1948550613490964","title":"When the Going Gets Tough","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Psychological and Personality Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Roulette; Psychology; Game of chance; Economics; Economic risk; Control (management); Social psychology; Actuarial science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.3031078566846019,"score_gpt":0.4740597776891398,"score_spread":0.17095192100453793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169258761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911664,0.0002733213,0.00035751658,0.0009933105,0.00007150836,0.000024306304,0.00008182765,0.000010347897,0.007021601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99757856,0.00019938717,0.0004129681,0.00048898975,0.00003551145,0.000014884491,0.00006748948,0.0000055097466,0.0011967191],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995617,0.00013311235,0.000022200098,0.00008541244,0.000091390066,0.00010619576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529785,0.0012837403,0.0019561003,0.00026021613,0.0002498737,0.0009523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013084831,0.00021979447,0.00033671744,0.000491529,0.0007034078,0.0022120378,0.0003211085,0.0012214687,0.0072151856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009528104,0.00029443792,0.0003174519,0.00022314854,0.0006575133,0.0012583548,0.0007369754,0.0016046515,0.0006572605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032125106,0.0019447242,0.8716008,0.00038701156,0.0004168998,0.0018264604,0.0105916755,0.00066656433,0.014968249,0.0055829487,0.004647916,0.08415418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053831915,0.0011373074,0.9757338,0.0001274484,0.0001800723,0.0007430459,0.007296424,0.0008656331,0.0012020147,0.0073747025,0.005218917,0.00006685156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019122898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036650875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072151856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030331445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036884323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02413714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169861135","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.761608","title":"Actions and Beliefs: Estimating Distribution-Based Preferences Using a Large Scale Experiment with Probability Questions on Expectations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ultimatum game; Dictator game; Dictator; Economics; Equity (law); Inequity aversion; Population; Microeconomics; Psychology; Econometrics; Inequality; Mathematics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.08438490108740206,"score_gpt":0.3913081046609685,"score_spread":0.30692320357356645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169861135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788344,0.000032017222,0.020058926,0.00013102083,0.000016460806,0.0001526137,0.000093384355,0.00004776762,0.00063334766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97620434,0.00003927795,0.022422053,0.00012352975,0.000021839218,0.0003478198,0.00024121409,0.000016827602,0.00058318477],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949768,0.0038330331,0.00016265512,0.00060291804,0.0002890202,0.00013550716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7700027,0.22012872,0.003771459,0.0044313082,0.00076393643,0.00090189517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011241068,0.00091280544,0.000925679,0.0003748439,0.00043256176,0.0015857823,0.0010416018,0.0021837458,0.002822484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076456875,0.0007806777,0.00085105863,0.0004585677,0.0015096592,0.0023317921,0.00085467455,0.0018614766,0.00040397246],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.077786766,0.053860497,0.24838625,0.0012827738,0.0029022293,0.0008611298,0.007550137,0.3251932,0.06545639,0.027129645,0.0031481818,0.1864429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005603593,0.011316832,0.0780044,0.0000501595,0.0005727079,0.00029271774,0.0007103968,0.86398834,0.010991021,0.027351774,0.00087252806,0.00024553324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003173075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002254539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011241068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000807552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006865744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059449136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171794807","doi":"10.1093/ije/dyr093","title":"Commentary: Money and models: double-edged swords","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"International Journal of Epidemiology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Pill; Population; Premise; Accidental; Economics; Actuarial science; Medicine; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.42341555404415354,"score_gpt":0.4683751396720869,"score_spread":0.04495958562793334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171794807","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006103641,0.0054305554,0.00021157495,0.9382292,0.055302802,0.000009525583,0.00015764551,0.000049450624,0.00054827734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030685687,0.004422048,0.0003683601,0.83824635,0.1520144,0.000089313595,0.00007152163,0.00009493058,0.0016244558],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98217094,0.009840994,0.0013162735,0.0021740727,0.0036383425,0.0008593161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7529197,0.21317244,0.00440188,0.0062191826,0.019217795,0.0040690294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024843218,0.003223163,0.005075667,0.0031914439,0.0054218266,0.0067393887,0.017915072,0.075885415,0.021880466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18822566,0.001962925,0.004416667,0.0038266403,0.0145648485,0.013509805,0.0050429204,0.08045077,0.011429728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003171284,0.0000065035933,0.000025739462,0.00021098235,0.00002992426,0.000070696056,0.00009825834,0.00009250318,0.000009103226,0.004036333,0.99371475,0.0016736207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044061185,0.0000559361,0.00044105793,0.0049202773,0.000168646,0.0004992996,0.0005720721,0.0018854568,0.00014283866,0.12867437,0.8620122,0.00018725896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026563594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021367246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075885415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011730645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013319262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13138503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171935043","doi":"10.5465/amr.2006.22527462","title":"Integrating Theories of Motivation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":734,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Expectancy theory; Behaviorism; Psychology; Cumulative prospect theory; Construct (python library); Organizational behavior; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Prospect theory; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.11985058076134746,"score_gpt":0.41490250420021485,"score_spread":0.2950519234388674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171935043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0433327,0.039001096,0.38627356,0.054132737,0.0018324075,0.0004582764,0.0004027692,0.00023869975,0.4743277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83245367,0.036519397,0.099358566,0.0062599853,0.0021534262,0.0010937569,0.0005047538,0.00010268397,0.021553852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634653,0.0015187158,0.00021320902,0.0005861087,0.0010180372,0.00031750332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945444,0.0028040532,0.00053830835,0.0005687025,0.0010930534,0.00045161176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057630353,0.0012907161,0.0011661635,0.0049819695,0.0016400714,0.0072498485,0.002127039,0.0023596652,0.0066677313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008211293,0.0004817537,0.001307731,0.0021397034,0.00809259,0.007707767,0.0044325464,0.0038328494,0.0010982371],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001404844,0.000076838245,0.0020724388,0.00021494442,0.00004350027,0.000055266504,0.0009611516,0.0014835884,0.00006964933,0.949426,0.0013655834,0.044216927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008579705,0.00004455044,0.001950986,0.00016897827,0.00002158339,0.000075510514,0.0005455554,0.0019550808,0.00005376875,0.97690123,0.01825622,0.000017924223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021523978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020227577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072498485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037588154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035913442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030478239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172106739","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2014.00797","title":"Different Neural Systems Contribute to Semantic Bias and Conflict Detection in the Inclusion Fallacy Task","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Beijing Nova Program; State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Fallacy; Premise; Generalization; Categorization; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Cognition; Task (project management); Set (abstract data type); Cognitive science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.10013063749643765,"score_gpt":0.3543238772839557,"score_spread":0.25419323978751807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172106739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99342936,0.000043259664,0.0045307064,0.0000917952,0.00002199608,0.00005921173,0.00011271239,0.000030752908,0.0016801764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99368495,0.00004385821,0.005174378,0.000112695925,0.000016556927,0.00011780946,0.00016282425,0.000047493628,0.0006394701],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999305,0.00014789331,0.000060885737,0.00017196269,0.00019145243,0.00012287532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975708,0.0013733496,0.00041172226,0.00020885692,0.000120194425,0.00031507146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013276885,0.0004431614,0.0006417662,0.000555754,0.00023905559,0.00097583147,0.00043196388,0.0007155355,0.003191078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008804249,0.00049012684,0.00028195934,0.0003352977,0.00082562916,0.0008963874,0.0011260359,0.0012430968,0.00022365658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0063608713,0.00083952496,0.036710043,0.00020893781,0.000105325074,0.00040146083,0.001424178,0.0010548742,0.9096969,0.0017657548,0.00035678668,0.041075308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007313516,0.0015804451,0.8314585,0.00005067512,0.00015462727,0.0016284373,0.0004547354,0.031078586,0.11590034,0.015878808,0.0010047746,0.00007867976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000818594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096574804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003191078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002900914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003619741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0106752515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173645876","doi":"10.1111/cjag.12089","title":"Existing Food Habits and Recent Choices Lead to Disregard of Food Safety Announcements","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Commit; Confirmation bias; Incentive; Food safety; Psychology; Social psychology; Perception; Cognition; Marketing; Economics; Welfare economics; Advertising; Business; Microeconomics; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.20056402583352304,"score_gpt":0.2878393866063336,"score_spread":0.08727536077281059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173645876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99824536,0.00003551784,0.00024162754,0.00010840252,0.0000035678743,0.000007978444,0.000012394433,0.0000031034258,0.0013420008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994803,0.000030651056,0.00016324523,0.000049442333,0.0000029980583,0.0000031966192,0.000016499358,0.0000022336567,0.00025134571],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881834,0.0005115053,0.00008861994,0.0001955839,0.0002128793,0.00017304833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772734,0.011959627,0.0071344017,0.0015291411,0.0009805496,0.0011229252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003771359,0.00017133875,0.00025797763,0.0004932541,0.0003728164,0.0012031015,0.00024038351,0.0007774519,0.0025633909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020742062,0.00027913376,0.00043560608,0.00034933633,0.0008428716,0.0006550118,0.0005795709,0.00095868355,0.00022663524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021730086,0.0010936076,0.9568601,0.00008340756,0.00016917527,0.00031724022,0.0026612354,0.0008478446,0.0056494623,0.0016227465,0.00023281728,0.028289322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040797804,0.00039392672,0.990945,0.000016502456,0.000090679256,0.00012418392,0.0017357597,0.002175468,0.001170799,0.0027341677,0.0005447562,0.000027882512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039971047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059068254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048433634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054604403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019945145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179187724","doi":"","title":"A signal detection analysis of contingency data","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; SIGNAL (programming language); Detection theory; Contingency table; Task (project management); Computer science; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Data mining; Machine learning; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.32624433343535153,"score_gpt":0.4614711499477292,"score_spread":0.13522681651237767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179187724","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099892214,0.00033136018,0.8939102,0.00077200093,0.00011379048,0.0005535565,0.0007549826,0.0007605463,0.0029113446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6019155,0.00015230005,0.3943691,0.00028557229,0.0001959146,0.00075753167,0.0012178039,0.00011880872,0.0009875742],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97929764,0.0114748245,0.0013046633,0.0028235684,0.004541253,0.0005580398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8597164,0.12075568,0.00571066,0.0071080783,0.0057918616,0.0009173263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024932098,0.0010829412,0.0012003141,0.0047162245,0.0012683771,0.0028243433,0.0010684106,0.0013698726,0.0057063615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.116842225,0.00040825733,0.0018679741,0.0029478592,0.002124302,0.0031524834,0.001810977,0.0028352381,0.0006303954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004559976,0.0010914644,0.06332122,0.0016796492,0.0011672926,0.0021124394,0.0033629988,0.04708641,0.032283396,0.2711715,0.008754992,0.5634086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025792074,0.001341811,0.03338404,0.00021464596,0.00022480998,0.0013559082,0.0010989903,0.7085588,0.011833467,0.23383187,0.00764573,0.00025191923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014099603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006100313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024932098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009699848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013779118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13185513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182569073","doi":"","title":"On Microeconomic Errors and Ordinal Group Decision Making","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Mathematical economics; Von Neumann architecture; Group (periodic table); Group decision-making; Pareto principle; Game theory; Decision theory; Social choice theory; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Mathematical optimization; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.3247082787357758,"score_gpt":0.46449957791930896,"score_spread":0.13979129918353317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182569073","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12516181,0.0114920065,0.5995814,0.065908276,0.0020378698,0.000111882546,0.00035712792,0.000120310244,0.1952294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94789934,0.0034457278,0.04035716,0.0017058614,0.0013322812,0.00015394947,0.00009271958,0.000056135625,0.004956785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986902,0.0075576296,0.0007579908,0.0009920588,0.003118117,0.00067218783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90368533,0.08102869,0.0049541625,0.0049895192,0.0042882985,0.0010539744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01739299,0.00075860857,0.0010954478,0.0025504294,0.001699075,0.004707872,0.0018223365,0.0021231652,0.004591553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06609474,0.0003141548,0.0008332212,0.0024437949,0.016779533,0.008669418,0.004561928,0.0046325666,0.0004399182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011699512,0.000007681029,0.0002044702,0.000027020415,0.000008295642,0.00003321337,0.00016215404,0.0038371321,0.00002613295,0.99256366,0.00050846953,0.0026099826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028532938,0.000003370876,0.00007202035,0.000022172335,0.0000019258835,0.000010316964,0.000038498536,0.0029484292,0.00002500169,0.9959305,0.00094005285,0.0000048902707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013367777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072019704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01739299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023804237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014457434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09198403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2183236895","doi":"","title":"Measuring the degree to which probability weighting affects risk-taking Behavior in financial decisions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of finance and investment analysis","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Econometrics; Degree (music); Perception; Actuarial science; Expected utility hypothesis; Prospect theory; Risk perception; Financial risk; Risk-seeking; Statistics; Economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.2363672371012722,"score_gpt":0.3670036610448052,"score_spread":0.130636423943533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2183236895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99738604,0.00002438309,0.0017117707,0.000031653584,0.0000016944097,0.000012655655,0.000007504266,0.000004609302,0.0008196213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99911445,0.000020284691,0.0007639183,0.000010905994,0.0000025488393,0.000006116605,0.000013778555,0.0000010219933,0.00006696754],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957776,0.0023479592,0.0003235211,0.00044464134,0.0008824821,0.00022387627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91505635,0.060520712,0.017796824,0.0032986666,0.0017582017,0.0015692329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075002345,0.00035412645,0.0003764397,0.0007545581,0.0003191105,0.0015240466,0.00025260882,0.00079042505,0.0011822645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052599706,0.00023526252,0.00034054506,0.0004919825,0.00083792314,0.0013790663,0.0007151476,0.00065592007,0.00016376721],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013661417,0.0011241573,0.92557895,0.00010379364,0.0003926006,0.00012445952,0.0023706355,0.008203178,0.01395856,0.0016882281,0.00009562721,0.044993665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044303295,0.0012716613,0.963013,0.00002129118,0.00016022478,0.00018063725,0.001059405,0.024368268,0.0044810916,0.005027101,0.0002985519,0.000074445525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000813114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008228128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075002345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004000272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031358656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03966546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184681077","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0022","title":"On the Distinction Between Rationality and Intelligence: Implications for Understanding Individual Differences in Reasoning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Irrationality; Cognition; Ecological rationality; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Great Rationality Debate; Extension (predicate logic); Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.440341880957961,"score_gpt":0.3617296448261046,"score_spread":0.07861223613185642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184681077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086891785,0.029838867,0.14864218,0.041880194,0.0008073946,0.000053627224,0.0001494282,0.000100649486,0.6916358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9277773,0.0069582257,0.034957927,0.0027624918,0.0003766632,0.000072635616,0.00009342016,0.00004995183,0.026951414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883395,0.00066683633,0.00004170586,0.00011961374,0.00028025144,0.000057637848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932394,0.0058953697,0.00018031884,0.00020829761,0.00034120987,0.00013541471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033252444,0.00036370152,0.00044265308,0.0010231575,0.00046387993,0.0037356862,0.00078493817,0.001267938,0.005748505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006666174,0.00020563512,0.0003385023,0.000935926,0.009187393,0.0052917497,0.0013667366,0.0028790487,0.00050087343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012257937,0.000012929958,0.00030773028,0.000038946248,0.000008071923,0.000025807944,0.0007744141,0.00097392447,0.00009318799,0.98532563,0.0012838504,0.011143256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002630685,0.0000030054312,0.00035721913,0.00003099712,0.000002382217,0.00001280767,0.000124455,0.0011568675,0.00003267124,0.99407095,0.0042025307,0.0000035930668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000984255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011061745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005748505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014843188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006516687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019230664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2186683519","doi":"","title":"Decision under Complete Uncertainty: Bridging Economic and Philosophical Research","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Decision theory; Computer science; Management science; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.07887474952652274,"score_gpt":0.2998956546475922,"score_spread":0.22102090512106948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2186683519","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1298796,0.13727032,0.3056883,0.20009886,0.001852133,0.0000737675,0.00033623286,0.00006551332,0.2247352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9345417,0.04317285,0.016110336,0.0020903612,0.0018086549,0.00006495432,0.00006204939,0.000022621578,0.002126396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923126,0.004302158,0.0002629656,0.00052785594,0.0019284299,0.0006659996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9589671,0.03530139,0.0019160178,0.0010524505,0.0017494775,0.001013601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012957987,0.00051933853,0.0012246835,0.002928582,0.0024763814,0.008104287,0.0013397072,0.003124584,0.002346798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02628349,0.00049417204,0.00056169496,0.004342825,0.025017599,0.0115641495,0.003666207,0.0036527559,0.00018653195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020714715,0.000020375368,0.00034329866,0.00014695835,0.000015830172,0.000052876952,0.00040936246,0.007781573,0.00003440487,0.98177737,0.000772618,0.008624579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004306832,0.000008697343,0.00028393193,0.00015315473,0.000003964342,0.000019370997,0.0006236737,0.007106663,0.000031125037,0.9862017,0.005552264,0.000011114878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01050044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008129518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012957987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009582415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062301015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0695256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2188657252","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2015.2349","title":"Intertemporal Uncertainty Avoidance: When the Future Is Uncertain, People Prefer the Present, and When the Present Is Uncertain, People Prefer the Future","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Risk-seeking; Intertemporal choice; Economics; Uncertainty avoidance; Value (mathematics); Prospect theory; Relation (database); Psychology; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Computer science; Individualism","score_opus":0.05837759396561091,"score_gpt":0.33853616275240406,"score_spread":0.2801585687867931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2188657252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722492,0.0014884683,0.007860975,0.0006229795,0.000045105848,0.0000444129,0.00008341329,0.000011950174,0.017593423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99665856,0.00048135742,0.0018371633,0.000289059,0.0000190578,0.000038046976,0.000045182423,0.000003943466,0.00062762643],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880064,0.00048246377,0.0000826858,0.00017162693,0.00038485028,0.000077778794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99062985,0.0056449547,0.0022167352,0.0007504237,0.00048770313,0.00027034298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003711905,0.0002941851,0.00034947507,0.0005418577,0.0005915234,0.0021002556,0.00034533453,0.00077214296,0.0025867757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014977305,0.00019244866,0.00048698156,0.00061197573,0.00091934425,0.002136991,0.0011819629,0.0011886882,0.00013648291],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0067039384,0.0012725013,0.46277323,0.0033556684,0.002314156,0.00085097324,0.05191703,0.004354003,0.033437233,0.0734152,0.004934065,0.354672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049136765,0.0024356297,0.76294005,0.0011568562,0.001836119,0.0021960195,0.028661508,0.008007034,0.012278604,0.14612047,0.03347729,0.0003991131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079533533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015402884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003711905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036186594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028013057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01963067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2207156987","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2259327","title":"Ratings and Asset Allocation: An Experimental Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Asset allocation; Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Econometrics; Financial economics; Portfolio","score_opus":0.05184616152527,"score_gpt":0.38094753990632824,"score_spread":0.32910137838105824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2207156987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99432397,0.00012096805,0.0016782671,0.00012680946,0.0001326217,0.0005970149,0.00035082505,0.000025212954,0.0026444038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832409,0.00022891225,0.005514229,0.00024895603,0.00027239174,0.002219521,0.000847925,0.000081258855,0.0073459656],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896813,0.0059478832,0.00084226124,0.0015988114,0.0013105994,0.00061912084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82069033,0.14742298,0.010470458,0.01608517,0.002500621,0.0028304579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013924447,0.0013670712,0.0026476989,0.0007526467,0.0009563285,0.0034550305,0.0032110235,0.0029737076,0.0236016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0775323,0.0013836661,0.0014610452,0.000800021,0.0032611643,0.0035934132,0.0021638367,0.0031549942,0.0024604427],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.5586317,0.22503765,0.043415308,0.0019947195,0.0020273535,0.00068282994,0.003315126,0.012693081,0.059647646,0.025755307,0.0042638737,0.06253544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.13216309,0.4399469,0.16518667,0.0003207237,0.005794536,0.0013933289,0.0022059241,0.1325729,0.035750568,0.07557183,0.007987038,0.0011064329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012550283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078196643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0236016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010877956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012282546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07895517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2208714138","doi":"","title":"Can We Steer Income Comparison Attitudes by Information Provision?: Evidence from Randomized Survey Experiments in the US and the UK","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Welfare; Randomized experiment; Demographic economics; Economics; Public economics; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.12797543062644612,"score_gpt":0.39360442847568466,"score_spread":0.26562899784923855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2208714138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9605719,0.0023721233,0.010605226,0.004118802,0.0005900832,0.0015277768,0.0009839011,0.00012089359,0.019109305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884819,0.0009331704,0.004120336,0.002202033,0.00014254662,0.0015008171,0.0003438066,0.00004075372,0.002234673],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.91249394,0.07600956,0.0031795583,0.0033846514,0.0036653948,0.0012668559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59778774,0.30813757,0.055188205,0.03086027,0.005476063,0.002550293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042629898,0.0006120539,0.0014202928,0.0006740623,0.0011987329,0.0021794299,0.0013327352,0.0028510888,0.012544595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23823817,0.0007235859,0.0011148974,0.00095491,0.0045252,0.0025775211,0.0015968576,0.001925332,0.002027171],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.2741956,0.04511226,0.13767363,0.00943317,0.007040321,0.00092505943,0.012485672,0.010653769,0.012512354,0.05495056,0.026298571,0.40871906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.12545562,0.13853277,0.408731,0.0049739634,0.010961113,0.00121504,0.0067337914,0.03649026,0.022652078,0.13960655,0.10324968,0.0013981877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005912588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038574573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042629898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015707331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014319521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22545117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213709983","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.003","title":"The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency in the monitoring and control of reasoning: Reply to","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Red Deer College; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Fluency; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Perception; Variety (cybernetics); Metacognition; Cognition; Meaning (existential); Control (management); Processing fluency; Cognitive science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics education; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.050266336855068094,"score_gpt":0.3348025094932448,"score_spread":0.2845361726381767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213709983","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040806714,0.0008021924,0.00014820171,0.987004,0.010781659,0.0000075234116,0.00004816708,0.000016390055,0.00078387116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008353645,0.0009860968,0.00034332497,0.9438855,0.043567415,0.00005224554,0.00003575758,0.000022114053,0.002753789],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862576,0.0004079931,0.00019800487,0.00026325867,0.00032572,0.00017933975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98306805,0.012451913,0.000607303,0.0005674731,0.002204243,0.0011010468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038488405,0.00076061406,0.0014571005,0.00061576755,0.0023479974,0.0034766279,0.0021418505,0.043611318,0.008277894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029072829,0.00064093457,0.0007933911,0.000644487,0.0048523745,0.0034197597,0.0017729222,0.033790983,0.004508074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017094177,0.000056081215,0.0007438321,0.00007375049,0.000021462267,0.0007256262,0.00022373626,0.000062725565,0.00012962663,0.004166925,0.9856295,0.007995721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068203383,0.00021125037,0.008034549,0.00056185323,0.00013426585,0.0034356178,0.0019190675,0.0024846077,0.0010204939,0.07720202,0.90404165,0.0002725549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004184594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005395084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043611318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023473564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002850014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027692318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216166587","doi":"","title":"Revealed Preference Foundations of Expectations-Based Reference-Dependence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Unobservable; Axiom; Preference; Revealed preference; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Economics; Positive economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.3176147541834413,"score_gpt":0.4632364730765734,"score_spread":0.14562171889313208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2216166587","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11164141,0.0004685069,0.83796567,0.003167586,0.0000646649,0.00007892569,0.00055987976,0.00015067737,0.045902617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95979595,0.00040829013,0.033993416,0.00034731757,0.00009400367,0.00009592275,0.00022924262,0.000043257587,0.0049926047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595827,0.0018285981,0.00021680945,0.0006201668,0.00095085346,0.0004252885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97906154,0.012103118,0.0026136963,0.0032309613,0.002096669,0.0008940329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005370064,0.00071018393,0.0010305023,0.0008606239,0.000979166,0.0038087524,0.0019352086,0.0022251266,0.006102801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022815486,0.0005606782,0.001590704,0.0009795686,0.0030172965,0.006873097,0.0021100924,0.0044121197,0.0006471037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031101798,0.000026167121,0.00025817478,0.000017721304,0.000015991705,0.000054859967,0.00009335012,0.0050957673,0.00023208922,0.99132276,0.00025631054,0.0025957262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015629661,0.000021516893,0.00017443439,0.0000066358875,0.000007561045,0.00003343935,0.000020141993,0.028991468,0.00013552254,0.970102,0.0004791604,0.000012485652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001837584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012651411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006102801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022816295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001299326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028399944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218675706","doi":"10.1007/s10683-021-09739-2","title":"Experimental elicitation of ambiguity attitude using the random incentive system","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Ambiguity; Incentive compatibility; Incentive; Ambiguity aversion; Certainty; Decision maker; Microeconomics; Compatibility (geochemistry); Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics; Operations research; Engineering","score_opus":0.15234836393363366,"score_gpt":0.4096902730082398,"score_spread":0.25734190907460613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218675706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8963089,0.00014842716,0.09263718,0.000539991,0.00012614221,0.00077257544,0.00012692162,0.00012722287,0.009212533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741054,0.0000757457,0.024495812,0.00016996749,0.00003143432,0.0004518923,0.000027209924,0.000015802627,0.00062673545],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900546,0.007556673,0.00050416094,0.0006697871,0.0009445512,0.00027020017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9708528,0.02166115,0.003020761,0.0035606793,0.0005496369,0.0003549027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008858689,0.0005194893,0.00052275497,0.00027689795,0.00031353245,0.00082300254,0.0005826578,0.0008654255,0.0036253214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032844763,0.00034887806,0.00021154762,0.00026377346,0.0014014944,0.00091785943,0.0012629601,0.0011520211,0.00028451823],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020631732,0.009766963,0.0121462215,0.001993362,0.00044839742,0.00049041404,0.002947818,0.020627689,0.59733844,0.1948441,0.0019826002,0.13678224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008756268,0.02570039,0.03822413,0.00035137965,0.00047196084,0.00076639216,0.0005832236,0.10654261,0.5428889,0.26251104,0.012686462,0.000517312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007556381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007000002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008858689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002507379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036027754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046849847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219998170","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2665823","title":"Valuation as a Mechanism of Self-Control","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Mechanism (biology); Economics; Actuarial science; Business; Accounting; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08644143932972072,"score_gpt":0.37507581624966535,"score_spread":0.28863437691994465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219998170","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2750597,0.0011356695,0.50956875,0.008486561,0.00036409017,0.00021814484,0.00021649244,0.0002688371,0.20468177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860772,0.00013035869,0.008314822,0.00014650039,0.0000888569,0.000056256606,0.00001540959,0.000012723496,0.005157825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735236,0.0014539268,0.00011778844,0.00034324272,0.00045459613,0.0002780393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990807,0.005295581,0.0011268363,0.0015390331,0.000694236,0.0005372919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004838372,0.00043875436,0.00057041465,0.0008688126,0.0005549423,0.004652687,0.0011308226,0.0019961987,0.008606031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013964999,0.0003243199,0.0006754088,0.000642994,0.0037879616,0.0056482954,0.0012330431,0.0012440111,0.00042919884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026418087,0.000026025262,0.00036230957,0.000017756778,0.000016979513,0.00003137238,0.00007697907,0.0015186135,0.00029119194,0.9937676,0.00023203673,0.0036326798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022033952,0.000027990209,0.00034700838,0.000010089813,0.000009309862,0.000040425934,0.000032286538,0.0073131714,0.00019281812,0.9912724,0.0007244494,0.000008094908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030385164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014524357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008606031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010379336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009044394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028789997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222340070","doi":"","title":"A Principal-Agent Model of Affect and Cognition: How to Explain Cognitive 'Biases and Fallacies' with a Unified Model","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Simplicity; Cognition; Affect (linguistics); Principal (computer security); Cognitive bias; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Fallacy; Maximization; Confirmation bias; Social psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10843900930614865,"score_gpt":0.3586299427851932,"score_spread":0.2501909334790446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222340070","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01914458,0.0022747528,0.8964031,0.017485984,0.0004511149,0.0001739226,0.00021822668,0.00027195294,0.06357647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7504642,0.0028216387,0.22753409,0.0019039017,0.0008281856,0.00081485684,0.00014477746,0.00010341056,0.015384957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974497,0.0012586986,0.0001292377,0.00034239606,0.00062190066,0.00019802478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99441624,0.003618216,0.0004568842,0.00049196405,0.00068639184,0.0003303974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069702747,0.0013275027,0.0015899515,0.0014410375,0.0009909421,0.0041582948,0.0030022643,0.004043745,0.006046625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012805127,0.00073054514,0.0014426901,0.0009959143,0.0047135325,0.0072455807,0.0021473363,0.0038065044,0.0016391457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015504545,0.00001941733,0.00030901164,0.000044947526,0.000030144245,0.00006881016,0.00022869903,0.011799484,0.00012048156,0.9825837,0.0007581815,0.0040216595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024553887,0.000018176941,0.00018796544,0.000023760686,0.000014556148,0.00004168615,0.00003536141,0.052274685,0.000034157645,0.94518954,0.0021416089,0.0000139802205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023338075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012553374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069702747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001612315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018780099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03686273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224157864","doi":"","title":"A REVIEW OF THE IMPLICATIONS OF PROSPECT THEORY FOR NATURAL HAZARDS AND DISASTER PLANNING","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Prospect theory; Normative; Management science; Decision theory; Expected utility hypothesis; Risk analysis (engineering); Robustness (evolution); Economics; Computer science; Political science; Business; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.22310779299787054,"score_gpt":0.5046843937783109,"score_spread":0.28157660078044033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224157864","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001384511,0.9928987,0.0010247688,0.0014509355,0.00026596923,0.0000067068568,0.00002627514,0.00000727393,0.004180841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010105448,0.99728703,0.00067519106,0.00023706227,0.00020978352,0.0000072747775,0.000020244788,0.0000014970005,0.00055141054],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994318,0.0001592611,0.000066862565,0.00007080356,0.0002462035,0.000025111369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976084,0.0016894237,0.00015121857,0.000036658363,0.00042975292,0.00008447637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014784653,0.00079570606,0.0012895333,0.0038438507,0.00043754312,0.0013824622,0.0011418223,0.0014365866,0.005450539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036029438,0.0004318208,0.00060818635,0.0067409403,0.000809629,0.0021849899,0.00058706634,0.0015672558,0.00263317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002618783,0.000053179738,0.00028546416,0.014668652,0.00007778209,0.0002648156,0.00013689381,0.0018816844,0.00047523822,0.033682555,0.0596345,0.8888131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009369548,0.00005593909,0.0017408365,0.0092268,0.000059690126,0.0009508203,0.00015717887,0.00040656657,0.00016766587,0.028720004,0.95846707,0.00003802739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003054086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056782076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005450539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016610016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024941496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018233895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225428089","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01872","title":"Editorial: Improving Bayesian Reasoning: What Works and Why?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica","keywords":"Psychology; Bayesian probability; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.04095256939231714,"score_gpt":0.3905398267846853,"score_spread":0.3495872573923682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225428089","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003152372,0.0029091365,0.0003231503,0.027770137,0.967589,0.000012676519,0.00007872753,0.00005347147,0.001232146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008379186,0.0045579965,0.00037968092,0.019119378,0.960091,0.000029675162,0.00008201354,0.0000899478,0.014812353],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950505,0.00090465543,0.00063280587,0.00068184384,0.0024758088,0.0002543185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97438407,0.011131205,0.0012459774,0.0005953206,0.010576858,0.0020665168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062683076,0.0027213334,0.0031007049,0.0036632002,0.0027980357,0.006993198,0.0029167733,0.008130117,0.016710594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036883682,0.0008629074,0.0021161132,0.0016819536,0.0022944326,0.0036290127,0.0011709449,0.014947169,0.010022569],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018560017,0.0000077652185,0.000015893236,0.00009865008,0.000011779263,0.000033956174,0.0000060172747,0.000039804487,0.000024864057,0.00038609334,0.9964851,0.0028714205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069158596,0.000035574783,0.00033143646,0.00064348226,0.00007268178,0.0001937327,0.00004156203,0.00047870787,0.00019204935,0.0040713786,0.9938366,0.000033594846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015432811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052401884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016710594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025621539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036098128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05590254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225505438","doi":"","title":"The Effect of Base-Rate Information on the Perception of Risk for Reoffense","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American journal of forensic psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Occupational safety and health; Suicide prevention; Injury prevention; Medical emergency; Base (topology); Environmental health; Forensic engineering; Medicine; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03427426429716592,"score_gpt":0.37277514223241554,"score_spread":0.33850087793524963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225505438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99497473,0.00021784657,0.00070243614,0.0001749148,0.000033354943,0.000014224182,0.000064707434,0.000019311485,0.003798551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989925,0.0000936103,0.0004992509,0.00006427382,0.000031510775,0.000004732843,0.00005424749,0.000014809577,0.00024498234],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985715,0.00058033096,0.00010157001,0.00022719867,0.00039760463,0.000121863435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84246105,0.14003141,0.0089284135,0.003425721,0.0023028504,0.002850518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00405076,0.00049525406,0.00043472913,0.0006407822,0.000320491,0.0025019965,0.0005623335,0.0015006585,0.005585993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09675521,0.000389709,0.00037596995,0.00024580734,0.0004686648,0.0014797921,0.00064913376,0.0017215614,0.0005247206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.09687877,0.008719097,0.5669542,0.000694006,0.0014161989,0.002037604,0.0041272305,0.01268677,0.1702946,0.0045787543,0.0024471078,0.12916565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004353688,0.004934916,0.9561232,0.0001083233,0.00069940946,0.0012186093,0.000815617,0.020708082,0.00861154,0.005547684,0.00062294217,0.00017429181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015797339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008870156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005585993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035188632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031030504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021422744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238668872","doi":"","title":"Multiutility representations for incomplete difference preorders","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université de Montréal","keywords":"Preorder; Abelian group; Mathematics; Preference; Interpersonal communication; Space (punctuation); State space; Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics; Social psychology; Computer science; Psychology; Statistics","score_opus":0.3060354782086988,"score_gpt":0.49497234365354625,"score_spread":0.18893686544484745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238668872","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16759829,0.00082691916,0.79970366,0.0013524927,0.00014649428,0.00009716389,0.0010525271,0.00027472893,0.028947797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8454701,0.0005326607,0.14308065,0.00022362302,0.00017886875,0.00028102833,0.0010138467,0.00010468584,0.009114463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768996,0.0007505901,0.00023594481,0.00039083825,0.0006654993,0.0002670835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99381775,0.0031098027,0.0008402711,0.0009238409,0.0008323076,0.0004760433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004029524,0.0007223581,0.0006656823,0.0023040923,0.0009482038,0.004233744,0.0011434153,0.00091824296,0.0073505635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009162598,0.0004312881,0.0012605205,0.0018439053,0.002159627,0.009905647,0.0020674544,0.0025086354,0.0007126154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030433841,0.00002083344,0.00023815906,0.000029991968,0.000007079276,0.000044486562,0.00026393123,0.004571967,0.00039383868,0.9872084,0.00038930695,0.006801549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011876282,0.000023448574,0.00014600271,0.000022812457,0.0000066366442,0.000046047327,0.00010138265,0.032081388,0.00033487924,0.9648977,0.0023148574,0.000013001109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009392627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001139293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073505635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019725554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008442139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024590075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2239841147","doi":"","title":"Revealed Preference and Choice under Uncertainty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalizability; Transitive relation; Dominance (genetics); Preference; Mathematical economics; Property (philosophy); Class (philosophy); Stochastic dominance; Revealed preference; Economics; Preference theory; Mathematics; Observable; Social choice theory; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Nash equilibrium","score_opus":0.3322906550061952,"score_gpt":0.4313822186688504,"score_spread":0.0990915636626552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2239841147","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18977064,0.003991322,0.72435325,0.012143647,0.00024728404,0.00016326414,0.00030616872,0.00009529546,0.06892909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96800953,0.001549533,0.026357125,0.00032956948,0.00013603565,0.0001245621,0.000060127648,0.000010246525,0.0034233627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934018,0.00454706,0.00019446223,0.0005706903,0.0009016965,0.0003843353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98667276,0.010147716,0.0013097174,0.0009400168,0.0005790787,0.0003507475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071926774,0.0005604607,0.00084911095,0.0007120374,0.0006777812,0.0032676265,0.0009149566,0.0015255219,0.003110757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01485708,0.00027451458,0.00091088243,0.0010901983,0.0043870476,0.003982635,0.001230012,0.0018517844,0.00022219445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027984035,0.000011111468,0.00025094883,0.000035725006,0.000025112684,0.000040375213,0.00011750479,0.010288495,0.00012689095,0.9851791,0.00027141673,0.0036252388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019432877,0.000021845719,0.00013022967,0.000013413627,0.0000075978837,0.000015075666,0.00004065561,0.0255292,0.00008802071,0.97299415,0.0011327819,0.000007697466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012239622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011418071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071926774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002557531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013396082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03803891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243759935","doi":"10.1016/j.econmod.2012.10.006","title":"Utilitarianism and unequal longevities: A remedy?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Modelling","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Counterintuitive; Economics; Redistribution (election); Microeconomics; Welfare; Planner; Consumption (sociology); Robustness (evolution); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.31936491768061054,"score_gpt":0.405982293900649,"score_spread":0.08661737622003846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243759935","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16965832,0.011932774,0.28144598,0.27575245,0.00282983,0.000114493516,0.00041059364,0.00021132655,0.25764427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96440625,0.002236403,0.014425266,0.006773984,0.0015690078,0.00014016911,0.00004897805,0.000103247636,0.010296582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914887,0.004626101,0.00038028325,0.0015091103,0.0011985387,0.000797393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96885633,0.017262936,0.0031576015,0.0069045583,0.0019653197,0.0018532838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020948432,0.0009286189,0.0023824773,0.0011685643,0.0026039851,0.0073200543,0.0024245773,0.006074596,0.013539917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049955174,0.00066346175,0.00072750077,0.00181697,0.021780837,0.019306581,0.00751611,0.00990573,0.00105348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003492709,0.000019951955,0.00054928224,0.000047471538,0.000026194706,0.00003442671,0.0005940922,0.00051422877,0.00006422182,0.9888666,0.0015713205,0.007677364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000919739,0.0000060750926,0.00017307195,0.00002561322,0.000004247842,0.00003103009,0.00020825496,0.00043946176,0.000033325654,0.99667645,0.002386081,0.000007172887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010737891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019187407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020948432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028461937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029798665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11078721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249072996","doi":"","title":"Data Dispersion in Economics(II) - Inevitability and Consequences of Restrictions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics and Finance","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Zero (linguistics); Dispersion (optics); Mathematical economics; Prospect theory; Risk aversion (psychology); Equity premium puzzle; Econometrics; Loss aversion; Expected utility hypothesis; Equity (law); Microeconomics; Physics; Risk premium; Philosophy; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.2030694654889453,"score_gpt":0.39670275949052375,"score_spread":0.19363329400157844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249072996","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043605354,0.0191723,0.87961006,0.022414817,0.0011623398,0.0001872827,0.00061165314,0.00038537354,0.032850824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8214767,0.01443604,0.1503661,0.0035548098,0.0033456825,0.0007195631,0.00044669062,0.0003639974,0.005290386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9691575,0.012830351,0.0037348776,0.004911057,0.008482642,0.0008836459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7194135,0.22801708,0.013730156,0.028955143,0.008592721,0.0012914089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02905665,0.0008477233,0.0023952902,0.003724181,0.0017131665,0.0063711186,0.0032006754,0.0036664961,0.0025914994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16350429,0.0012263638,0.0017470563,0.0035232275,0.01704709,0.017746395,0.007272269,0.0070856516,0.0006519697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007276814,0.000026975282,0.0035561628,0.0004413621,0.00008165749,0.0003722502,0.0004935812,0.01018782,0.00042163816,0.95495343,0.0016489825,0.027743299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018288514,0.000035302295,0.0010153964,0.00022108146,0.000026980872,0.00050832616,0.000119721466,0.010917854,0.0006773953,0.97894603,0.0074702967,0.00004325901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010594815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035670394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02905665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027931172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015708691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1536681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255306320","doi":"","title":"The Prevalence of Meta-Cognitive Routes to Judgment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Processing fluency; Fluency; Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Information processing; Cognitive bias; Persuasion; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2619273423306071,"score_gpt":0.4342654462087001,"score_spread":0.172338103878093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255306320","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19152194,0.039848585,0.64363164,0.029925622,0.0010057735,0.0014012769,0.0016678976,0.0034693314,0.08752793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84827334,0.00480218,0.14046639,0.0018953833,0.00088849786,0.0008358877,0.000804747,0.0003680239,0.0016655659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9279088,0.037631445,0.005678178,0.011050474,0.016464695,0.0012663917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39017788,0.45763886,0.03273095,0.09711675,0.019540647,0.0027948886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1180368,0.0022491137,0.003174025,0.017117867,0.002280158,0.019414047,0.005590153,0.0043559186,0.008740483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44073293,0.0024405154,0.004218391,0.008186179,0.008488192,0.032059796,0.008263907,0.0061531174,0.0014245422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001178474,0.0003436906,0.06448016,0.007823521,0.00839827,0.0011462353,0.026164051,0.00387057,0.002008822,0.5298244,0.009490185,0.34527165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018322596,0.00012440373,0.012506621,0.0010015639,0.0012983308,0.0012787934,0.0020868394,0.015937412,0.001839188,0.9485084,0.01501935,0.00021592507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013222817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013762239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1180368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031828694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027542098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62424576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259056550","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.205763","title":"Was Sandmo Right? Experimental Evidence on Attitudes to Price Risk and Uncertainty","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Guelph; University of Georgia; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Ambiguity; Economics; Certainty; Contradiction; Price level; Risk aversion (psychology); Hedge; Factor price; Mid price; Price risk; Econometrics; Ambiguity aversion; Distribution (mathematics); Microeconomics; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical economics; Financial economics; Monetary economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Futures contract","score_opus":0.22915696164699925,"score_gpt":0.4835074613162342,"score_spread":0.25435049966923495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259056550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.971221,0.0012220358,0.0029926538,0.003961636,0.000156201,0.000044719443,0.00006545021,0.000021776525,0.020314537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99167913,0.0011757496,0.0024767397,0.0021853892,0.00016911875,0.000077375495,0.000074834155,0.000027457423,0.00213411],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99555534,0.002211266,0.00029073207,0.00066300534,0.0011287655,0.0001508714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90173656,0.076167755,0.011862057,0.0077325925,0.0013545983,0.00114659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008530305,0.00057110365,0.00065881707,0.0005079345,0.000816097,0.0025050319,0.0008135317,0.0021340186,0.008360086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049598966,0.00059844885,0.00042721216,0.00054373906,0.0034578273,0.0024565696,0.0012653635,0.002842446,0.0006158811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04011079,0.02903576,0.20012191,0.0031365184,0.0028659808,0.0024070768,0.030985205,0.008308233,0.14942391,0.23133025,0.010176252,0.29209808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055193575,0.0230832,0.5516446,0.0010598561,0.0016193622,0.0022148457,0.010743372,0.018715667,0.055179346,0.25893047,0.07056069,0.0007291446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006518265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066741084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008530305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004243873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003416235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045113087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261535159","doi":"","title":"Chapter 20: Human Psychology and Market Seasonality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mood; Financial market; Stock market; Phenomenon; Affect (linguistics); Economics; Stock (firearms); Financial economics; Efficient-market hypothesis; Behavioral economics; Psychology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Finance; Geography; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06929669184290022,"score_gpt":0.40479366739964456,"score_spread":0.33549697555674435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261535159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03214469,0.4167183,0.015791157,0.0313038,0.004628339,0.00021577075,0.000800348,0.0001253477,0.4982722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34229022,0.46023104,0.011149956,0.014168965,0.010059674,0.00037231614,0.0007208312,0.00015453069,0.16085249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971884,0.00007807588,0.000012989894,0.00005878102,0.00008757285,0.000043702974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931026,0.00045428314,0.00005099471,0.0000409969,0.00009531119,0.000048188173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041080939,0.0004967554,0.00040719562,0.0008072274,0.00095681887,0.003005633,0.00049274287,0.0013213091,0.021833455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011548696,0.00019370549,0.000538893,0.0012211796,0.001578576,0.0016094216,0.000991999,0.0019025448,0.002826767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007229076,0.00033248737,0.007620688,0.0014672956,0.00010217124,0.0003404302,0.003919154,0.0023324352,0.0017307114,0.62928843,0.1246539,0.22814003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011547396,0.00016793665,0.024360545,0.002130899,0.000048390484,0.00051388884,0.0018590941,0.0009096392,0.0006906328,0.31262004,0.6566487,0.00003868637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021122682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023246019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021833455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012094025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009601791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07304019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265410261","doi":"","title":"Integration-segregation decisions under general value functions: \"Create your own bundle -- choose 1, 2, or all 3 !\"","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación","keywords":"Portfolio; Product (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Sign (mathematics); Capital (architecture); Cover (algebra); Microeconomics; Economics; Business; Computer science; Mathematics; Financial economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.1368852723062701,"score_gpt":0.35444948985129654,"score_spread":0.21756421754502644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265410261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53038055,0.00044096945,0.4023199,0.0019712923,0.000092614115,0.0003138264,0.00024067023,0.00019699945,0.06404314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91308504,0.00023203705,0.08209144,0.00021763094,0.000036816116,0.00017768586,0.00010866235,0.000041726165,0.0040090024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953002,0.0018220684,0.0003319835,0.0009454226,0.00088359386,0.0007167028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930102,0.004421062,0.00086855266,0.00071532116,0.0005266155,0.00045814752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006815451,0.0007614608,0.0008990904,0.00085781683,0.0010568307,0.0040343837,0.0010460295,0.0021196937,0.0048284614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022369677,0.00042307694,0.0010555062,0.0007654352,0.0038721066,0.008162789,0.0018360951,0.0019285445,0.00061130914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028722952,0.00019468738,0.004231516,0.00010155767,0.00007662782,0.00033659211,0.0005265777,0.041398402,0.0024414414,0.88238895,0.0021170082,0.06589938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003977177,0.000082424594,0.0018622166,0.000042127638,0.000033486845,0.00020691524,0.00020421986,0.110737436,0.001958217,0.88208777,0.0027047563,0.000040636183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011410041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010755633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006815451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013973482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007896447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036043942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271262700","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0168045","title":"Quantum Decision Theory in Simple Risky Choices","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Cogito Foundation; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Formalism (music); Quantum probability; Decision theory; Quantum; Computer science; Mathematics; Quantum mechanics; Physics; Quantum process; Quantum dynamics; Statistics","score_opus":0.19610481715450573,"score_gpt":0.3746953224475208,"score_spread":0.17859050529301507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271262700","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18103461,0.0046200696,0.743544,0.008490744,0.00039101657,0.0002081976,0.0013904276,0.00014416859,0.060176715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9330546,0.0018776661,0.056378085,0.00062666246,0.0004118349,0.00028604965,0.00047647016,0.00004549114,0.0068429806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658656,0.0019284612,0.00017297681,0.00042768547,0.0006034833,0.0002807597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98444504,0.01241874,0.0010811171,0.0008340744,0.0007680996,0.00045292842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076826327,0.0005195195,0.0016234855,0.0015622758,0.0013107093,0.0035913377,0.0014473647,0.0016535203,0.0089842575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021475427,0.00044456296,0.0014771346,0.0022808218,0.0040160283,0.0054775313,0.0017151779,0.0028930397,0.00056115957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015701902,0.000016658636,0.0005385801,0.00003472362,0.000015096974,0.0000430298,0.000106279,0.019502323,0.00006307274,0.97549903,0.0007428543,0.003422565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001063047,0.000008283693,0.0003354565,0.000011674285,0.0000034257848,0.000015055193,0.000024036139,0.06581027,0.000021686074,0.9328744,0.0008759461,0.000009208218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063169585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003207483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0089842575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032331543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016082327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04063016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274268699","doi":"10.1177/1474704915596295","title":"Inequality and Risk-Taking","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolutionary Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Guelph; University of Regina","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre","keywords":"Inequality; Economic inequality; Social inequality; Economics; Demographic economics; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.37242365136744127,"score_gpt":0.5002848410627674,"score_spread":0.12786118969532612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274268699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97234297,0.0015066268,0.0021536476,0.0016114777,0.000033644472,0.000016602713,0.00004535089,0.00000549376,0.02228426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998895,0.00032317496,0.00030729416,0.00008072496,0.000013747653,0.0000053129047,0.000014857245,0.0000011800416,0.0003588623],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858224,0.0007990268,0.000062538915,0.00013887836,0.00023589315,0.00018138063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99443454,0.0023038443,0.0016778088,0.00028875744,0.00030971295,0.0009853203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017004019,0.00020707045,0.00023914107,0.000505873,0.0008614386,0.0014009272,0.0002262311,0.0005214352,0.0036762552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008624166,0.000099190554,0.00024169392,0.0003605835,0.0012918365,0.0006033855,0.001295686,0.00092134014,0.00013115368],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006320728,0.0010873968,0.7762535,0.00023810072,0.00054594036,0.00066780567,0.009479515,0.0027496684,0.0027068919,0.05897644,0.0015625904,0.14510003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037005015,0.00046916667,0.88890904,0.00020319731,0.0001389927,0.00064879993,0.00579372,0.0039635883,0.0007982027,0.091130085,0.007841336,0.00006689237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018108712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019152927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036762552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006337832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032779144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012298346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274516545","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.028","title":"Inactivation of the orbitofrontal cortex reduces irrational choice on a rodent Betting Task","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neuroscience","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Orbitofrontal cortex; Infralimbic cortex; Psychology; Task (project management); Iowa gambling task; Preference; Cognitive psychology; Neuroscience; Impulsivity; Odds; Addiction; Prefrontal cortex; Cognition; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.12855788192761716,"score_gpt":0.3871258353234358,"score_spread":0.2585679533958186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274516545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979328,0.00013101286,0.00094896124,0.00028672686,0.000054395296,0.000013517558,0.00014040824,0.00008783666,0.0004044363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99553454,0.00030696802,0.0016997266,0.00020633773,0.000027300699,0.00006133648,0.00025505494,0.000115026305,0.0017937596],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.999587,0.000043613112,0.0000282895,0.00010256518,0.00008784401,0.00015075703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867463,0.00016530337,0.0004624765,0.00019839904,0.00007024006,0.00042895696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039321987,0.0011722993,0.00076806895,0.00082956464,0.0003467253,0.00058236776,0.0007526442,0.0012470061,0.002394946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085425645,0.00064246566,0.00037653232,0.00022741428,0.0021205584,0.0005395611,0.0004520654,0.002433296,0.0003450227],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028484056,0.00062836765,0.0010860781,0.000050624578,0.00004886692,0.000069065725,0.000051173083,0.0003807192,0.99067104,0.00044363912,0.00020094067,0.0035211728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012731532,0.0055642333,0.03946153,0.00006356921,0.00029627272,0.0004672297,0.00045627146,0.011618367,0.9362642,0.0023238296,0.0021194292,0.000091862974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025771924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004680854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025771924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008251848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082243735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008011878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278093153","doi":"","title":"Local Utility and Risk Aversion","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Risk aversion (psychology); Economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Psychology; Business; Expected utility hypothesis; Financial economics","score_opus":0.0589741161451992,"score_gpt":0.3114001571649144,"score_spread":0.2524260410197152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278093153","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2838097,0.0020986707,0.66158044,0.00196363,0.000056349236,0.000050679235,0.00012631173,0.00008018034,0.05023397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97639674,0.00053902686,0.019418992,0.00012155379,0.00006409475,0.00003966623,0.000024593692,0.000015292693,0.0033801787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998968,0.00048677746,0.00003567593,0.00015516675,0.00025020886,0.00010412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996407,0.0018989247,0.00069984427,0.00038287768,0.00034552254,0.00026585624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020787062,0.0004921,0.00063131057,0.0008448533,0.00044578835,0.0015694563,0.000773776,0.00056186685,0.0037099835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063712243,0.00018018736,0.00071421993,0.0009500599,0.002412579,0.0028457511,0.0018799235,0.0015146033,0.0002524795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030606738,0.000040900013,0.0028208646,0.000076141194,0.000042479223,0.00012528469,0.0007088975,0.010651915,0.0011160795,0.963472,0.00038957695,0.020525206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000106679245,0.00009932846,0.003803532,0.00004819394,0.000024477551,0.0001775285,0.00022814597,0.034751907,0.0005388075,0.9570756,0.0032117318,0.000029976825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005825745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051510165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037099835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008597854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003066097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012411118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288204951","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2504745","title":"Prince: An Improved Method for Measuring Incentivized Preferences","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Economics; Econometrics; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.10972215738432402,"score_gpt":0.40860822774715916,"score_spread":0.29888607036283515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288204951","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09899268,0.00024710366,0.8800047,0.00030451542,0.00016450921,0.0006373352,0.004543907,0.0037059134,0.011399286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39009142,0.00022800025,0.58955735,0.00030031364,0.00007630631,0.0016085613,0.002057441,0.00052906596,0.015551526],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579984,0.0018479562,0.00015511086,0.00040805593,0.00164245,0.00014658176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884597,0.0075423094,0.0009943056,0.0015256035,0.0011873789,0.00029069043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004194011,0.0007135879,0.0009257531,0.0022101146,0.00035499432,0.0014992659,0.0008108589,0.001218806,0.013465463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028172871,0.00048268292,0.0006471971,0.0020395769,0.00039088322,0.0020329908,0.0013166764,0.0013703208,0.0030945232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026536752,0.0011436826,0.048511237,0.0010023034,0.00076605164,0.00021964322,0.0010346096,0.017971132,0.039375607,0.04150562,0.029870821,0.8159456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004900051,0.0015591335,0.11283555,0.00021581897,0.00038879176,0.001139234,0.00046190026,0.69416505,0.06599079,0.08298242,0.03917224,0.0005990157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011375801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021605182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013465463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003938766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081443647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04504645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291239260","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2725953","title":"A Neuroeconomic Theory of Attention- and Task-Switching with Implications for Autism and ADHD","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autism; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Neuroeconomics; Task (project management); Developmental psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.051546478713512436,"score_gpt":0.3434037642049364,"score_spread":0.291857285491424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291239260","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30467847,0.0047050226,0.53452283,0.028336952,0.0005226365,0.00025893116,0.0010479655,0.00019146522,0.12573577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96493596,0.0012337922,0.021816345,0.0005693298,0.00026592318,0.0001395023,0.000117634154,0.000029032533,0.010892529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918824,0.00030327754,0.000038091493,0.00016134653,0.00014884153,0.00016016667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99303174,0.0055361213,0.000471183,0.00022926416,0.00037322272,0.00035847013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021218916,0.00071765523,0.0011859846,0.0010282506,0.00069838477,0.0030897462,0.001960788,0.0021058035,0.015686207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012496006,0.0005614913,0.0009146973,0.0009103492,0.0021013033,0.003907987,0.0012983227,0.002256169,0.00046381343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011002814,0.00022945176,0.00530166,0.0000838197,0.000060139468,0.00020693193,0.00021259225,0.059541382,0.00043343555,0.9110753,0.0028515703,0.019893697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034208595,0.00004975029,0.0048521813,0.000023899174,0.000030706324,0.00015834633,0.00018384129,0.14299929,0.00006706819,0.85036266,0.0012118948,0.00002618895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009605069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007507578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015686207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029247524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017444022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05247563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295338520","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00009","title":"Commentary: Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Reflection (computer programming); Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Volume (thermodynamics); Neuroscience; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.09309772626100003,"score_gpt":0.45680279035260846,"score_spread":0.3637050640916084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295338520","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014876232,0.0038812286,0.00012828053,0.94710463,0.04794104,0.000007857805,0.00010534684,0.00002408741,0.000658777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003562361,0.0026795035,0.00020936289,0.89003175,0.101743124,0.000047261467,0.000039926144,0.000030965577,0.0016557097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936249,0.0020332625,0.0005405308,0.0015019499,0.001847495,0.00045189663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9207448,0.06059899,0.0019209312,0.0012454579,0.013315034,0.0021748615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00818949,0.0016576902,0.0021837044,0.0017626825,0.0050689005,0.0038747375,0.008869263,0.0502896,0.0069161057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056095734,0.0008272313,0.0018598639,0.0017634269,0.010786057,0.0069725164,0.0027362043,0.057236083,0.0075564403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005680496,0.000012526768,0.00009543546,0.00024763425,0.00001415142,0.00013543224,0.0004928119,0.000041743868,0.000084840125,0.0054258606,0.9893339,0.004058824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018731806,0.00010405299,0.0017055725,0.00184802,0.00008488185,0.000847254,0.0017507091,0.0005702642,0.0005105477,0.04350252,0.9487534,0.00013550221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025996817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019637825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0502896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065447013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008739823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051690996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299773574","doi":"10.3390/risks4010008","title":"Optimal Insurance for a Minimal Expected Retention: The Case of an Ambiguity-Seeking Insurer","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risks","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Georgia State University","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Deductible; Ambiguity; Constraint (computer-aided design); Indemnity; Actuarial science; Distortion (music); Schedule; Equivalence (formal languages); Insurance policy; Mathematics; Arrow; Economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.2717739886010315,"score_gpt":0.44497642256905096,"score_spread":0.17320243396801943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299773574","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32237577,0.001398983,0.65512645,0.005097392,0.0000656779,0.00017296681,0.0002986642,0.00013126207,0.015332773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95353514,0.0004800396,0.04265369,0.0001540044,0.0000667265,0.0001089106,0.0000548229,0.000025470203,0.0029211873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779874,0.000923536,0.0001152877,0.0004529986,0.00033099428,0.0003783886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545527,0.0030090543,0.00065972086,0.00029543822,0.00022235776,0.0003581221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00409299,0.0008321909,0.0019074951,0.0005979209,0.0006576966,0.0015989998,0.0014415261,0.0028064637,0.0026152048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01044273,0.00063567935,0.0011328624,0.00049046683,0.0019773007,0.0030323754,0.001565305,0.0018651916,0.00024029735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004757492,0.00026297057,0.0020006625,0.00036259214,0.00015175638,0.0007061353,0.0005701558,0.30840197,0.0058688307,0.6548135,0.0019235172,0.02446215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025893372,0.00040122494,0.0014420968,0.00011688968,0.00007931638,0.0003871591,0.00016768178,0.49915427,0.0020693007,0.493606,0.0022434192,0.00007371774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014587707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053970027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00409299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017618487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016731069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021646082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2308591296","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2015.11521abstract","title":"How Incidental Confidence Influences Self-Interested Behaviors? A Double-Edged Sword","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Self-confidence; Prosocial behavior; Psychology; Dictator game; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; SWORD; Dictator; Outcome (game theory); Mechanism (biology); Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Political science; Communication","score_opus":0.20082159718368908,"score_gpt":0.40763385010852415,"score_spread":0.20681225292483507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2308591296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97797537,0.0021132354,0.005294758,0.0028768242,0.0001084268,0.00004997739,0.000083670435,0.000030668205,0.011467033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972535,0.0004286056,0.001037277,0.00047341798,0.00005397852,0.000023460589,0.00002176203,0.000016575488,0.0006915662],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638486,0.0017336314,0.00017835382,0.0007159531,0.0007670094,0.00022015838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95475227,0.033486884,0.0032099388,0.0053736777,0.0014698091,0.0017074556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004358604,0.00037695936,0.0009334734,0.00055029395,0.00059286953,0.0022681833,0.0006611267,0.0013866501,0.0036891794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03012084,0.00039405556,0.0006192202,0.0003596806,0.0025583934,0.0018270435,0.001765894,0.0014517087,0.0002843669],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042217593,0.002492751,0.64158535,0.0009974575,0.0024200338,0.0010173032,0.011165659,0.002467994,0.039055485,0.02469975,0.0024557903,0.2674207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017728373,0.0014395339,0.9555209,0.00027435677,0.00064156286,0.00041547432,0.0018949134,0.003539712,0.0052243248,0.026292784,0.0044812746,0.00009773439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018286696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018020037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004358604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028490013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006892249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023050785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313739240","doi":"10.1080/00207543.2015.1131865","title":"Cournot game with incomplete information based on rank-dependent utility theory under a fuzzy environment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Production Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Cournot competition; Complete information; Mathematical economics; Rank (graph theory); Preference; Game theory; Mathematics; Economics; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.23536853597053176,"score_gpt":0.4535527530241436,"score_spread":0.21818421705361185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313739240","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09725955,0.0004609754,0.8828988,0.0008642123,0.00008798088,0.00019688383,0.0002786226,0.00011419272,0.017838862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542511,0.00037358757,0.03924059,0.00012227632,0.00006789612,0.0001681396,0.00008378569,0.000013914244,0.0056786826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958769,0.0019756758,0.00019819771,0.00062765955,0.00088323944,0.00043829362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966273,0.0020174386,0.00058746204,0.00018836805,0.00036527627,0.00021409032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028535733,0.0012206476,0.0017121434,0.0007661665,0.0009307071,0.002757372,0.0013618888,0.001538388,0.0029682484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066248886,0.00043899595,0.0010432856,0.0008215882,0.0023776677,0.0037401132,0.0012139862,0.0019003195,0.00020281594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012200963,0.00006446635,0.0009481838,0.00011481798,0.00008652471,0.00068286556,0.0003617107,0.3497912,0.0019082215,0.6377452,0.0008692125,0.0073055592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051441686,0.00010414146,0.0005503511,0.00001917711,0.000036556532,0.00012671047,0.00007387003,0.8267587,0.0002962377,0.17077683,0.0011479937,0.00005802611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056238915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003756645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056238915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021444245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001331861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015558958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322436276","doi":"10.1037/a0023586","title":"\"Hindsight bias from 3 to 95 years of age\": Correction to Bernstein et al. (2011).","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Hindsight bias; Psychology; Bernstein polynomial; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.22009332300850729,"score_gpt":0.4338916762259025,"score_spread":0.21379835321739524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322436276","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00089245377,0.008690197,0.0019711852,0.16446535,0.8085156,0.00010689639,0.011752528,0.00073718705,0.0028686323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04442556,0.019851957,0.012565778,0.4367079,0.37827712,0.0017650953,0.010757934,0.0011279988,0.0945207],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99497753,0.0009902334,0.0008307855,0.0011787326,0.0015348337,0.00048786384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97005826,0.01181522,0.0021545356,0.001926783,0.013070126,0.0009751215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006186071,0.0035444633,0.0032923878,0.004392918,0.001905401,0.002052748,0.007684756,0.00727313,0.03324268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06966739,0.0010337096,0.0032661762,0.0041107023,0.0020222552,0.0024839493,0.0025034263,0.009754906,0.016502207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007500777,0.000009635097,0.00046802824,0.00024136287,0.000038250244,0.00020762617,0.000044874487,0.000030303452,0.000051758154,0.0005478825,0.9922921,0.005993216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044645788,0.000088993096,0.030648207,0.0028231542,0.0004883193,0.0034088835,0.00038168454,0.000879821,0.00080852717,0.0070146183,0.9528293,0.00018197666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04999946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050209716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04999946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034316157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049809483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11120784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323260661","doi":"10.1509/jmkr.48.4.755","title":"Multiple Routes to Self- versus Other-Expression in Consumer Choice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Priming (agriculture); Expression (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Compromise; Consumer choice; Social psychology; Dimension (graph theory); Identification (biology); Risk-seeking; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.44221241319001503,"score_gpt":0.4996332879537894,"score_spread":0.05742087476377439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323260661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91567254,0.001347529,0.039769493,0.0018884025,0.00003636854,0.0001138153,0.000024061646,0.00004382668,0.04110401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98889726,0.00038056812,0.009097797,0.00016662377,0.000017512895,0.00007170618,0.000011113056,0.000016306232,0.0013411127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99513763,0.0030511916,0.00017228376,0.00049578014,0.00097248843,0.00017064529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886126,0.008417289,0.0011893397,0.0009193362,0.00048902864,0.00037239562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053577027,0.00042216567,0.00051445176,0.0009146224,0.0007510043,0.0044808337,0.0005774488,0.0012300988,0.003132439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014249788,0.00047654656,0.0007412448,0.0006189175,0.0041745594,0.0041575013,0.002535969,0.0020631962,0.00030139892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027598992,0.0015432455,0.06988335,0.0011401802,0.00041477702,0.0007353091,0.053413376,0.0046721483,0.06771523,0.5191735,0.0008749926,0.27767396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034361263,0.0013616467,0.13857956,0.0003879179,0.0003185678,0.0012766551,0.013857738,0.019894563,0.02884547,0.78459436,0.010252496,0.00028751654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002818158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003088329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053577027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009117146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004618532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028334558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331725338","doi":"10.1037/a0034887","title":"Base rates: Both neglected and intuitive.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Neglect; Base (topology); Social psychology; Information processing; Cognition; Salient; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Developmental psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10049814131948827,"score_gpt":0.4264947180489293,"score_spread":0.32599657672944105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331725338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85652953,0.0051824627,0.07713514,0.0023673149,0.00025498625,0.00021214232,0.00043761593,0.0006186875,0.05726208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881193,0.00076975604,0.0082222605,0.00055161864,0.00009493346,0.00008986705,0.00019489894,0.000120097924,0.001837338],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931503,0.0014531168,0.00068353966,0.0008355832,0.0034980013,0.00037955563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95998144,0.01526666,0.013660086,0.005020875,0.0041287923,0.0019421164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056343325,0.0009555789,0.00051004713,0.0021878704,0.00061894074,0.0039058416,0.0011661496,0.0012647585,0.0031216182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06326468,0.0007327135,0.0004157729,0.0012406512,0.002732948,0.004889197,0.0036007173,0.0016853766,0.0005047019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030938429,0.00064375537,0.3079011,0.0020465245,0.0005579469,0.0028994544,0.031556558,0.0027144267,0.06527218,0.10341868,0.007759716,0.47213575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033583006,0.002103409,0.52005935,0.0017188065,0.00091447716,0.021757292,0.016465833,0.018810624,0.037911393,0.29728243,0.081946634,0.00069406664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001089482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075552077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056343325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008018532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075658166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029797554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332905537","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2577967","title":"Optimal Insurance with Heterogeneous Beliefs and Disagreement About Zero-Probability Events","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Zero (linguistics); Actuarial science; Economics; Econometrics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06863502844397323,"score_gpt":0.3397318518995336,"score_spread":0.27109682345556035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332905537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9001272,0.00045191962,0.07814123,0.005551027,0.00009050109,0.00004235714,0.00016771005,0.00007641217,0.015351812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960626,0.00009390368,0.0022525282,0.00009658938,0.00004620984,0.00001528088,0.000032860717,0.000007558484,0.0013924916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979386,0.0010154212,0.000107477485,0.0002873995,0.00021494071,0.0004361901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96678025,0.028965874,0.001928062,0.00083071104,0.00046324372,0.0010318804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058278367,0.0006895879,0.0015779659,0.00081023254,0.00065768877,0.0033357416,0.0012175239,0.0035245991,0.0036446915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03644688,0.0007408356,0.00089743466,0.0005999194,0.0024057236,0.0034013952,0.0017087782,0.0022031835,0.00022831722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014664531,0.0005020485,0.009521371,0.00025370158,0.00029527114,0.0012053865,0.0008608989,0.2032407,0.0018030561,0.75795764,0.0023721945,0.020521423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019247248,0.0001246483,0.002857712,0.000032287662,0.00007453987,0.00015690744,0.0002819693,0.29136074,0.0002624847,0.7043417,0.00027759044,0.00003696123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021285638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087573304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058278367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015510302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008969534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030820847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333026799","doi":"10.1037/a0030906","title":"Direct evidence for a dual process model of deductive inference.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Inference; Statistical inference; Heuristic; Frequentist inference; Computer science; Mathematics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Discrete mathematics; Bayesian inference","score_opus":0.3929391790820133,"score_gpt":0.5409938992105198,"score_spread":0.14805472012850646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333026799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4327866,0.0020409191,0.42510086,0.011956893,0.0012137932,0.0013438041,0.0026221697,0.0014245581,0.12151034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93471146,0.00034610997,0.056495246,0.0023802437,0.00021006909,0.00066867063,0.001374818,0.00019381913,0.003619677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98686904,0.0037972513,0.0010432905,0.004192583,0.003600243,0.00049763493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8353581,0.110782206,0.01290991,0.02906035,0.007975645,0.003913861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019554153,0.0011934577,0.0013292935,0.001941037,0.00068914634,0.0032810536,0.0046110842,0.004023879,0.030586373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11627222,0.0014635148,0.0021730887,0.0009156544,0.0036342733,0.0111536225,0.0052626594,0.0044772597,0.0036581757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020080669,0.0102425935,0.11144159,0.008174514,0.003208134,0.0025674803,0.0103214905,0.021252383,0.058387958,0.51967967,0.012674829,0.22196862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004732408,0.003775351,0.08161808,0.00047114116,0.00093637046,0.005406149,0.00088734296,0.18048443,0.014912188,0.68726176,0.0190789,0.000435853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011948313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070767704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030586373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012300314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010316633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336257582","doi":"10.14288/1.0105712","title":"The application of statistical decision theory to a perceptual decision-making problem","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Decision theory; Evidential decision theory; Decision analysis; Perception; Causal decision theory; Computer science; Evidential reasoning approach; Business decision mapping; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Mathematics; Epistemology; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035489589474884474,"score_gpt":0.28122507006767294,"score_spread":0.24573548059278846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336257582","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10085591,0.0012481252,0.8853671,0.005307771,0.00029952833,0.0003132896,0.00010926942,0.00018003186,0.006319065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6953818,0.0007804966,0.30074602,0.0008837415,0.00036118427,0.0005917888,0.000117969816,0.00006980427,0.0010671649],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9602895,0.031335697,0.0013654893,0.0021919133,0.0036051467,0.0012122021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7577184,0.22626768,0.005706571,0.004120299,0.004808617,0.0013783548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04592108,0.0014386894,0.0024412794,0.0024810939,0.0015231103,0.004975773,0.0025955823,0.002669458,0.0027760922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15463567,0.0010889568,0.0021492203,0.0018173202,0.009187453,0.0051866807,0.0017395631,0.004318547,0.00044284618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013395513,0.00071688154,0.013145914,0.00080732215,0.0007768173,0.0007710324,0.0018904074,0.42900205,0.0020174338,0.39408332,0.0028898404,0.15255941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001227266,0.0002107738,0.0012085111,0.000054378743,0.000030780062,0.000110129826,0.00018667281,0.5570947,0.00043075645,0.43939093,0.0010935306,0.00006615258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037502882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001758048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04592108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035215255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043932833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24285674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340771183","doi":"10.3819/ccbr.2016.110002","title":"When Humans and Other Animals Behave Irrationally","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative cognition; Animal behavior; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Neuroscience; Developmental psychology; Biology; Cognition; Zoology","score_opus":0.5234870141353815,"score_gpt":0.49228622357067914,"score_spread":0.03120079056470232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340771183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6765645,0.0039717904,0.03057843,0.026734842,0.0013007304,0.00014229091,0.00019559368,0.0005712343,0.25994053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970415,0.00086842576,0.0045532514,0.0070797675,0.00020007974,0.00012394713,0.00011123441,0.000086447544,0.016561816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969496,0.0012076274,0.0001425533,0.0005213524,0.00070525584,0.00047366088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650663,0.00080133765,0.0012822424,0.0006277265,0.00036270428,0.00041940447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020840128,0.00041202677,0.00042321428,0.0006832627,0.0009099642,0.0033468413,0.00052289997,0.0016125467,0.005282131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011866214,0.0002194364,0.00033942977,0.00036118712,0.006251447,0.0019457233,0.0025977597,0.0014275672,0.0016942266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013917662,0.00051245844,0.2896375,0.0004668248,0.0005229487,0.009542584,0.025019059,0.0030432474,0.022979053,0.3394509,0.03742139,0.27001235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014816814,0.0008338346,0.18420789,0.00048596362,0.00019721256,0.013982242,0.018105095,0.0056034313,0.0070466395,0.49846846,0.27063942,0.00028161058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010958137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001003351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005282131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007777746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046520465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017670512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340876148","doi":"10.4213/tvp5029","title":"Последовательные $\\delta$-оптимальные потребление и инвестирование для финансовых рынков со стохастической волатильностью при неизвестных параметрах","year":2015,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Теория вероятностей и ее применения","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Russian Science Foundation","keywords":"Delta; Geology; Physics","score_opus":0.3719890601196676,"score_gpt":0.44925162661847495,"score_spread":0.07726256649880736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340876148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045374777,0.0047672936,0.20663048,0.009368888,0.0011919495,0.00017502627,0.001468249,0.0006510828,0.7303722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5770561,0.008155122,0.15551256,0.0015905433,0.00060764037,0.0008489785,0.0013163916,0.00095809915,0.25395462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781203,0.00045401,0.00011538769,0.0004554864,0.0009385789,0.00022438866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976235,0.0006508684,0.0002495651,0.00040508958,0.00088446203,0.00018655731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013919637,0.0006965064,0.00058870023,0.0018589223,0.002251153,0.008306507,0.0011839494,0.001548231,0.055360526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059095,0.0007692629,0.00064707815,0.0017016612,0.0036633657,0.0044706627,0.0025230283,0.002217586,0.014022727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060113936,0.000036131823,0.0014161941,0.00020911326,0.000023511091,0.00022197096,0.0011821561,0.0016169327,0.0040262556,0.9168625,0.009375342,0.06496964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003115024,0.00005950178,0.0035236066,0.00028782254,0.000043372896,0.0007236886,0.0027935454,0.005734085,0.0074361814,0.6326846,0.3465674,0.00011512138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055833794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005258567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055360526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025541708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043014907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18519938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343277410","doi":"10.1080/08959285.2016.1157595","title":"Intrinsic motivation, external reward, and their effect on overall motivation and performance","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Performance","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Contrast (vision); Intrinsic motivation; Cognitive evaluation theory; Payment; Motivation theory; Cognition; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Goal theory; Self-determination theory; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07796442960559502,"score_gpt":0.32064013492874555,"score_spread":0.24267570532315053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343277410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880918,0.00071862264,0.0013138031,0.00027117005,0.000020993833,0.000028725066,0.00005356997,0.000014296726,0.009487051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997879,0.00018228138,0.0007285111,0.00004844909,0.000018420706,0.000028662951,0.000030654468,0.000011063059,0.001072826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979126,0.0011505404,0.00007495998,0.00026481884,0.00036859186,0.00022857652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98536277,0.008528777,0.0025614495,0.00092275615,0.00046826573,0.0021560208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040167146,0.0005670395,0.0005814116,0.00058810407,0.0003659031,0.0019137037,0.0005254115,0.00077673997,0.0054971366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010207657,0.00023032965,0.000491027,0.0003466245,0.0016861438,0.0009914729,0.0014773358,0.0010972808,0.00035109316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0125810085,0.012299587,0.65595645,0.0008986358,0.0017467604,0.00039244135,0.0016528788,0.0048893755,0.033334784,0.05029849,0.0010565096,0.22489305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000173387,0.002694249,0.9748223,0.00007057653,0.00020914842,0.00007555548,0.00024212801,0.003445512,0.0032929517,0.01362788,0.0013025436,0.000043641834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039145563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005769688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054971366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052044657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000511864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021242678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343550067","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2015.2360","title":"Optimal Time-Inconsistent Beliefs: Misplanning, Procrastination, and Commitment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; University of Cyprus; Northwestern University; Purdue University; National Science Foundation; Yale University; Princeton University; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Procrastination; Incentive; Heuristics; Dynamic inconsistency; Overconfidence effect; Context (archaeology); Optimism; Consistency (knowledge bases); Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Time consistency; Preference; Temptation; Microeconomics; Computer science; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.06130036716212591,"score_gpt":0.36102389068397983,"score_spread":0.29972352352185394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343550067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7684775,0.00035929965,0.21138158,0.003909469,0.000048712714,0.00008359749,0.0002237251,0.000072957526,0.0154431835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99215955,0.00007238752,0.0070583196,0.00007723099,0.0000121182875,0.000034644974,0.000036865073,0.0000062408517,0.0005426013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977192,0.0011762357,0.0001227982,0.00038109344,0.00031314322,0.00028751537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683123,0.018205741,0.008854695,0.002375691,0.0010647676,0.0011867873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004230336,0.00046971266,0.00050190283,0.00058769865,0.00052885077,0.0022607236,0.0009816062,0.0012557177,0.003661657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035777725,0.0005791633,0.0005645238,0.00058397686,0.0025300293,0.0024642164,0.0014696207,0.0023593686,0.00018396902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000787698,0.00059230067,0.0997491,0.00021703953,0.0003237317,0.00048627256,0.0033064748,0.15690221,0.0023219672,0.6758087,0.0014134397,0.058091074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013736998,0.00022493348,0.024345057,0.000043422504,0.00008783566,0.00012439041,0.0006679076,0.2298245,0.0007040379,0.7428784,0.0009030548,0.00005907781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028683925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025871312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004230336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018422304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013394954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022372425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346103795","doi":"10.1177/0956797616640705","title":"More Similar but Less Satisfying","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Brand names; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.36448613647690453,"score_gpt":0.5170243418813324,"score_spread":0.15253820540442786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346103795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9050937,0.0008695567,0.004534162,0.0019350775,0.00030915297,0.000100826524,0.000227951,0.00008296382,0.08684665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98733866,0.0002619226,0.0029480613,0.0012974162,0.000055166845,0.000027206162,0.00023707615,0.000032618387,0.007801736],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992149,0.00022872427,0.000051308667,0.00013759671,0.00026313725,0.00010436168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829894,0.00034153814,0.0003016712,0.00044407797,0.0002993193,0.0003144771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007977168,0.00031943346,0.00035560044,0.00045893737,0.0006904655,0.0019406546,0.000324165,0.001046818,0.020885807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004297882,0.00013414536,0.00038351896,0.0003783213,0.000933232,0.0016448833,0.0014747959,0.000989426,0.0014031142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005763564,0.00476956,0.16955435,0.0027060723,0.0013192652,0.0030982974,0.012133513,0.003180694,0.15137917,0.21691968,0.033678826,0.39549702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084751047,0.0053297104,0.4421702,0.0005923442,0.0011227101,0.008130408,0.02138238,0.0118331,0.021718334,0.15448977,0.33202916,0.00035441262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009030405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010794325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020885807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055255054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003091024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069869936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2354814473","doi":"10.1016/j.beproc.2016.05.002","title":"Initial examination of priming tasks to decrease delay discounting","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioural Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge; McMaster University","funders":"National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities; National Institute on Drug Abuse; National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism","keywords":"Discounting; Delay discounting; Psychology; Temporal discounting; Randomized controlled trial; Priming (agriculture); Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Impulsivity; Internal medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.20521748116948638,"score_gpt":0.41767497197417297,"score_spread":0.2124574908046866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2354814473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9595393,0.0014327468,0.0324827,0.00083567627,0.00030822988,0.0009037143,0.00043466676,0.0001903669,0.003872676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541809,0.00116294,0.03887543,0.00087153405,0.00024061557,0.00089891016,0.00037309283,0.00021096668,0.003185713],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935573,0.0002286071,0.00008923768,0.00014709284,0.000101690304,0.00007763388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993913,0.004279428,0.00036394395,0.0005898465,0.0005334926,0.00032022395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027415846,0.0012523946,0.00068778393,0.00041016212,0.00038523457,0.0006482002,0.0009611148,0.0010453305,0.0029199563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011525471,0.0004425913,0.00035360406,0.00024693133,0.0005141917,0.00089069124,0.00034965487,0.0019799608,0.00044649065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017168578,0.011573676,0.0025008498,0.0008860209,0.00006987801,0.00016337616,0.00040211194,0.00091886165,0.8914501,0.0041835844,0.00080410426,0.069878705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016505615,0.031736054,0.014604885,0.00012908298,0.00034907876,0.0006918629,0.000118815704,0.006853484,0.92910486,0.0051334114,0.009548813,0.000079174824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077662856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007468189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029199563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003183775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093195424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014499068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W238568077","doi":"10.4324/9780203358061-15","title":"Ambiguity made precise: a comparative foundation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Ambiguity; Computer science; History; Archaeology; Programming language","score_opus":0.35048312759603867,"score_gpt":0.4468497772871338,"score_spread":0.09636664969109515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W238568077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026573794,0.008822686,0.3035657,0.008734981,0.00060295366,0.000050798124,0.0001789853,0.00007936858,0.6513907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9219575,0.0061031147,0.04334014,0.0014518505,0.0011983773,0.00014522929,0.0001968576,0.00011129278,0.025495654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973955,0.0010181856,0.00010345586,0.00042440934,0.0008404708,0.00021799248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99644655,0.002189869,0.0002985073,0.00045705054,0.00041459445,0.00019349933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003971555,0.00083668367,0.0007065295,0.002038497,0.0023893407,0.006550014,0.0012260987,0.0023938266,0.009615362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008234922,0.00037349766,0.0009568134,0.0017027468,0.009873485,0.013123822,0.0036380342,0.0048296163,0.0007611739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013640533,0.0000019656798,0.0000150757105,0.000005432434,0.0000014531204,0.0000060675175,0.000042224943,0.00021095588,0.000018551276,0.9983277,0.00013861805,0.0012305846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020645612,0.0000050166755,0.000058291356,0.000021180678,0.000002775729,0.000018927176,0.000047134883,0.0008031141,0.00003930841,0.99097776,0.008021485,0.0000030016736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092683156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007085206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009615362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038217797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010406718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0321666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399606725","doi":"10.29173/cais637","title":"Influence of Need for Cognition and Need for Cognitive Closure on Information Behaviour","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Closure (psychology); Psychology; Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04803628603982367,"score_gpt":0.3151716091163965,"score_spread":0.26713532307657284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399606725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934175,0.0001827146,0.0018197148,0.00017308263,0.0000071341765,0.000038660342,0.00003755471,0.000014425101,0.004309212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805236,0.000065318665,0.0013938503,0.000026941894,0.0000073475867,0.000035508536,0.000038540955,0.000008366037,0.0003718228],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857026,0.008185683,0.0008136917,0.0010448387,0.0033586624,0.0008945352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7579664,0.20286106,0.02008835,0.007822703,0.00625443,0.005007076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011363605,0.00039038423,0.00056674524,0.0015585946,0.0006480078,0.0031248468,0.0004654005,0.00090923137,0.0037464295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09942111,0.00037147608,0.00070409256,0.00062841165,0.0015387953,0.0015355306,0.0020845504,0.0011658181,0.0002077642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004943799,0.0028418887,0.82838756,0.00070205866,0.00060752494,0.0004332053,0.022272099,0.0024301347,0.013339521,0.0050987164,0.0004914513,0.11845193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007057697,0.0014352428,0.98224187,0.000079314676,0.00014796625,0.00024384483,0.0048609516,0.0029014428,0.002225876,0.0036887866,0.0020295042,0.00007456157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002503805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020642106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011363605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013239848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013216553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060097218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2400773071","doi":"10.82308/8080","title":"Suggestion modulates deeply ingrained processes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Automaticity; Suggestibility; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Cognition; Stroop effect; Hypnosis; Context (archaeology); Automatism (medicine); Reading (process); Perception; Trait; Neuroscience; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.06187368744174021,"score_gpt":0.31557344862210274,"score_spread":0.2536997611803625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2400773071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942122,0.00032833364,0.0025006027,0.00014450641,0.000045702945,0.000032072123,0.000032132313,0.00007541188,0.0026289383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99687743,0.0001795692,0.002024912,0.00005528882,0.000019923003,0.000020278725,0.000024272818,0.000030477326,0.0007678238],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934536,0.0002533865,0.000040893297,0.00015749488,0.00013918173,0.000063768675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969964,0.0013462402,0.000731637,0.000511749,0.0001789253,0.00023515247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046790953,0.00038319407,0.00024467657,0.00026381118,0.00024359861,0.0005772447,0.00029157876,0.00040643764,0.0025323818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038160672,0.00017671414,0.00021572656,0.000120051045,0.0005674141,0.0004509685,0.0007350585,0.00077876437,0.00021545748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014021968,0.00039604297,0.0078740055,0.0002289222,0.00004417683,0.00022470157,0.0015897064,0.0001429034,0.95675665,0.0016944623,0.00019126965,0.029454919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049960293,0.007857238,0.62972003,0.00010841193,0.0002905202,0.0011806467,0.0012673184,0.005154213,0.33320254,0.0098564485,0.0106977215,0.000165334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032483204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003755716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025323818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022683997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021256284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008471727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2405516634","doi":"10.4018/978-1-4666-9989-2.ch007","title":"Economic Decision Making, Emotion, and Prefrontal Cortex","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in psychology, mental health, and behavioral studies (APMHBS) book series","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroeconomics; Consumer neuroscience; Prefrontal cortex; Psychology; Self-reference effect; Anterior cingulate cortex; Neuroscience; Social decision making; Posterior parietal cortex; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Cognition","score_opus":0.09175461107323424,"score_gpt":0.4763771090778247,"score_spread":0.3846224980045905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2405516634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0110503575,0.27636093,0.011904166,0.012674679,0.0026826977,0.000026997548,0.00024500836,0.00012640741,0.6849288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14821918,0.24480289,0.012740399,0.0041886615,0.0032152494,0.00008623803,0.00035687519,0.00011849704,0.58627194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999628,0.000006287009,0.0000010854604,0.000009084584,0.000016370428,0.0000044139356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99994123,0.000037731315,0.000004659224,0.0000026202788,0.000008277742,0.0000055298588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014212077,0.00037309498,0.00016718723,0.00027536915,0.0002708265,0.0012615919,0.00023080516,0.00043117726,0.009148509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029900283,0.00012831799,0.00017116826,0.00039688058,0.0007733732,0.0010286532,0.0003229983,0.0010878101,0.0016310961],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052700783,0.00004185755,0.0004172251,0.0003745657,0.0000193794,0.00016308848,0.0010090056,0.0021242963,0.0025007066,0.45483598,0.16781312,0.3706481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000107374135,0.000024396108,0.003292418,0.00052903395,0.000010729348,0.00049664057,0.00029049156,0.0013376675,0.00065646647,0.30799204,0.6853389,0.000020500505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014231171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021952633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009148509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078940357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005709766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03060478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2408398668","doi":"","title":"Decision rules and correlated features","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Decision rule; Cognition; Feature (linguistics); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Psychology; Operations research; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.031944881259334125,"score_gpt":0.2860680697399145,"score_spread":0.25412318848058035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2408398668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83027565,0.00065693795,0.14092134,0.0011110627,0.00011258154,0.00031737812,0.00026704668,0.000090611014,0.026247349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9618042,0.00022788066,0.03659696,0.00015741732,0.00002258197,0.00015572869,0.0001376544,0.000017886225,0.00087961584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98825026,0.0069879084,0.00064433983,0.0015942294,0.001923492,0.0005998749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.954349,0.035090037,0.0044117384,0.0038675098,0.0014292418,0.0008524098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009229027,0.0007327924,0.0012585303,0.0011328835,0.0008310727,0.0037292268,0.00140228,0.0014962308,0.0037711186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07008203,0.00050663785,0.001018144,0.0011849739,0.0037710597,0.004200686,0.0014585541,0.0020648944,0.00034589614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011601095,0.00091239973,0.053394023,0.0006946124,0.0007723191,0.0007024964,0.0020138628,0.3163842,0.00378302,0.48312646,0.002365903,0.13469058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000277309,0.00038465456,0.011079399,0.00012992763,0.00015336425,0.00032719888,0.0004102906,0.23598297,0.0021289445,0.7443691,0.0046415576,0.00011532938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016851263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014978845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009229027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014054552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011170487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048808277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412317068","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500007269","title":"Backward planning: Effects of planning direction on predictions of task completion time","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Cambridge; Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Conceptualization; Task (project management); Situational ethics; Psychology; Plan (archaeology); Process (computing); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Computer science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.0784911569911952,"score_gpt":0.3773283579389439,"score_spread":0.29883720094774874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412317068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936342,0.00009528557,0.0041744825,0.00007499913,0.000015205354,0.000052840194,0.0001011489,0.000057943787,0.0017939087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970084,0.000035582663,0.0025616535,0.000031145693,0.000006178423,0.00006182104,0.00009210079,0.000022242823,0.00018085762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954531,0.0025186162,0.00030754064,0.00082826783,0.000735221,0.0001571444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7600544,0.2075057,0.01909696,0.008560075,0.0033692066,0.001413661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010522665,0.00055983255,0.0004181773,0.0005267484,0.00028477985,0.0015542768,0.0005922139,0.0008506982,0.003126462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.122091785,0.0005241713,0.00049747707,0.00034685837,0.00083136547,0.0015873217,0.00078825385,0.0014395316,0.0003456606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.044093605,0.0029531321,0.7152783,0.0005481841,0.00079122715,0.00035005977,0.0066422834,0.06812227,0.045165747,0.005424208,0.0014232897,0.109207764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010000729,0.0056304187,0.8405722,0.00018239781,0.00045469718,0.00022080113,0.0011970106,0.11651329,0.018316349,0.014179885,0.001481454,0.0002514086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026520228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015842528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010522665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058607315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055126176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055649817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2413665923","doi":"10.1097/wnr.0000000000000495","title":"Stimulus-preceding negativity represents a conservative response tendency","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neuroreport","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Psychology; Counterintuitive; Expectancy theory; Dilemma; Negativity effect; Cognitive psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Task (project management); Social psychology; Event-related potential; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Developmental psychology; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.5250364136970371,"score_gpt":0.49850352499600953,"score_spread":0.0265328887010276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2413665923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99194455,0.0001453381,0.004839665,0.00008416387,0.000028772294,0.000042851298,0.00012854343,0.000049608072,0.0027365498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99779534,0.0000669644,0.0014566319,0.000120271354,0.000017470205,0.00002886116,0.00007424976,0.000013488257,0.0004267871],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998198,0.00004670271,0.000014682114,0.00005738295,0.00004205423,0.00001943855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989856,0.00054054306,0.00028049908,0.000059271748,0.00006277845,0.00007140026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048275403,0.000231074,0.00017766398,0.00017473784,0.00009547444,0.0002140077,0.00015437412,0.0003868898,0.0021477062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002321015,0.000118625874,0.0001293387,0.00008812425,0.00039933983,0.00021664028,0.00022202183,0.00029509046,0.00016573684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096069276,0.00011373589,0.017210467,0.0001420078,0.00004608767,0.00036405935,0.00020501396,0.00031923008,0.96334493,0.00046499906,0.0002628914,0.01656583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001103796,0.0013252925,0.916647,0.000034827048,0.00006231014,0.0025715537,0.00021393766,0.0036097113,0.06888297,0.005463796,0.0010376262,0.000040618394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014788893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022752077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021477062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104586856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057540485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0071848035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414426779","doi":"10.1037/apl0000121","title":"An integrative formal model of motivation and decision making: The MGPM*.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"PsycINFO; Psychology; Prioritization; Townsend; Goal pursuit; Empirical research; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Management science; Statistics","score_opus":0.12308160801237555,"score_gpt":0.4426518321841005,"score_spread":0.3195702241717249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414426779","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0626361,0.0005885065,0.8893514,0.003234049,0.000071364935,0.00015522267,0.00026333096,0.00018893325,0.043511055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7733147,0.0005333571,0.22133513,0.0004739643,0.00008984612,0.0005803118,0.00025992407,0.00004537553,0.003367367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983342,0.0008879913,0.000059469246,0.00029093286,0.0002842663,0.00014308387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954918,0.0029677206,0.0005733845,0.00039204562,0.00032650845,0.00024860428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032941503,0.00072005775,0.0006234852,0.00095989957,0.0005371325,0.0020421261,0.0017924904,0.0010481671,0.006122117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00848855,0.00035391233,0.001691354,0.001019801,0.0022496083,0.0035765553,0.0015887241,0.0018943452,0.0007976328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040423376,0.00007657144,0.0026082252,0.00009754953,0.00004696637,0.00007675451,0.00035682763,0.029148541,0.00027993263,0.94846106,0.0008398656,0.0179673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002919913,0.000078285324,0.0015463221,0.000037301194,0.000021543212,0.00011433405,0.00007853823,0.12769523,0.0001351994,0.86685383,0.0033952876,0.0000148797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002391013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016604253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006122117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016906859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023174018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020480514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2417813467","doi":"10.1037/pspa0000058","title":"Revising probability estimates: Why increasing likelihood means increasing impact.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"PsycINFO; Event (particle physics); Psychology; Social psychology; Cognition; Climate change; Conditional probability; Econometrics; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Economics; MEDLINE; Mathematics","score_opus":0.17316157277339728,"score_gpt":0.4587315922926804,"score_spread":0.2855700195192831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2417813467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4411058,0.053801343,0.19321854,0.15717152,0.0031860145,0.0002405553,0.00420328,0.0010809487,0.14599195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97264004,0.004943422,0.017092124,0.0027734858,0.0003485247,0.0000504958,0.0002817429,0.00008858199,0.0017815746],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574333,0.002099886,0.0002933585,0.0008968503,0.0008450654,0.000121605124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94016016,0.0440747,0.00830253,0.0031127767,0.0034731475,0.0008767188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005753582,0.00038949912,0.00029903077,0.0011030108,0.0004909926,0.0044405838,0.0009822723,0.0020157988,0.007878834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14051512,0.0004064421,0.0004325352,0.001537494,0.0036843626,0.008044162,0.0013404264,0.0022995009,0.0012954317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008251093,0.00019578524,0.16736501,0.0020383846,0.0007412834,0.0009270709,0.0146498205,0.012565934,0.0030912666,0.16152357,0.0564445,0.5796322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014087101,0.00046026337,0.20931362,0.0016616408,0.00051917956,0.0014813978,0.006891729,0.025995722,0.0032033469,0.6681315,0.08186076,0.0003400164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004726341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00499767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007878834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012960439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008149046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030428171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2418231525","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20150071","title":"Attitude to health risk in the Canadian population: a cross-sectional survey","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CMAJ Open","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes; University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University; Vancouver Coastal Health","funders":"Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Population; Numeracy; Cross-sectional study; Risk aversion (psychology); Psychology; Demography; Environmental health; Medicine; Geography; Economics; Literacy","score_opus":0.35684462402325123,"score_gpt":0.5128200314597706,"score_spread":0.1559754074365194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2418231525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846144,0.00032411722,0.00017855484,0.00042996748,0.000012847368,0.00019521725,0.0116809085,0.000016577536,0.0025475495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99274266,0.000604755,0.00050789525,0.0004406087,0.000010277403,0.00011383769,0.0045556277,0.000006906953,0.001017384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986278,0.00011332046,0.000099224715,0.00017301088,0.0006790395,0.0003075963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784136,0.00012789412,0.0003696605,0.000089774665,0.00106931,0.00050200237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014648066,0.00045963065,0.0004217942,0.0017922488,0.0027558343,0.00096865126,0.0012183001,0.0007312636,0.0021182632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028772862,0.0004919307,0.0007913886,0.004799087,0.0007996735,0.0005692128,0.00104381,0.0008683205,0.0004981585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045829744,0.00007898871,0.99337834,0.000071822564,0.000052455493,0.00006121437,0.0012616324,0.00005653522,0.00014044097,0.000054473603,0.0016509632,0.00314725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005371553,0.000035773195,0.9978149,0.000020123116,0.000015312655,0.0000328506,0.0011206393,0.00013309495,0.000025104024,0.000011430443,0.0007742025,0.000011212298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98709863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98635083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014372598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014372598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016048193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10428101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2418924742","doi":"10.1111/asap.12119","title":"Goal Framing in Public Issue and Action Decisions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Campion College; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Framing effect; Loss aversion; Social psychology; Psychology; Public economics; Prospect theory; Economics; Public relations; Political science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.28297419481605923,"score_gpt":0.5105024283733234,"score_spread":0.22752823355726415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2418924742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84967124,0.0006968063,0.026996342,0.0051164203,0.00017817692,0.00014395794,0.000054556698,0.000035167155,0.11710742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955159,0.00013391043,0.0032735867,0.0002202149,0.000024854426,0.000037174206,0.000016844502,0.0000073114184,0.0007702744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98782504,0.009567568,0.00024014871,0.00043685912,0.0014216317,0.0005088818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96159285,0.02963574,0.0048063565,0.0010593657,0.0017698554,0.0011358303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015235502,0.00044121259,0.00025131207,0.0011644019,0.0013263039,0.0040935148,0.00036094134,0.0015926803,0.004835654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047408395,0.00036993367,0.00046638589,0.0005994918,0.0032671697,0.0025894272,0.0017855605,0.0020217665,0.00030270606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016862969,0.001428046,0.15392521,0.0008538726,0.0002578621,0.0014915611,0.1377432,0.010935627,0.009576472,0.47833627,0.0046694954,0.19909604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038401695,0.001331758,0.20972611,0.0011858306,0.00035173772,0.0006915259,0.08284865,0.033038456,0.005943397,0.60950214,0.0547113,0.00028510133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019092562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022473072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015235502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002361226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015426523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080573976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2431859568","doi":"10.1017/s0033291716000866","title":"Steep discounting of delayed monetary and food rewards in obesity: a meta-analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Psychological Medicine","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":275,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Homewood Research Institute; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Publication bias; Meta-regression; Sample size determination; Delay discounting; Obesity; Psychology; Random effects model; Regression analysis; Statistics; Demography; Econometrics; Medicine; Economics; Clinical psychology; Mathematics; Internal medicine; Impulsivity","score_opus":0.5675461112680579,"score_gpt":0.5435027870232559,"score_spread":0.024043324244801934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2431859568","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021439971,0.97592497,0.0012239753,0.00027616398,0.00020147425,0.0002527234,0.00030572913,0.000030089752,0.00034498548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45250502,0.53882,0.0057050004,0.0007413386,0.00042045797,0.0009354268,0.0005383071,0.00003568494,0.00029874666],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903314,0.0055043385,0.0019831962,0.0009745913,0.0009537265,0.0002526843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9606801,0.030913576,0.005585856,0.0010750084,0.0013968702,0.0003486512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022336233,0.002634821,0.010635042,0.005337076,0.0005418435,0.004101409,0.0017527045,0.0019131155,0.0024124335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046379153,0.0013567182,0.03942165,0.0045357374,0.00080002716,0.001962441,0.0012729076,0.002409541,0.00016623459],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0075035878,0.00010451908,0.013382315,0.1263792,0.82981986,0.00016990653,0.0001248403,0.0012256231,0.00025448675,0.00025483526,0.0003437967,0.02043704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014476143,0.0006598502,0.009329869,0.015567246,0.97059816,0.00016778651,0.0000540216,0.0005640745,0.00018383456,0.000476134,0.00091353926,0.000037922153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034205804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049107783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022336233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021074794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00201767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11812669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463671667","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2016.2547","title":"The Value of Nothing: Asymmetric Attention to Opportunity Costs Drives Intertemporal Decision Making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Opportunity cost; Economics; Value (mathematics); Task (project management); Microeconomics; Intertemporal choice; Nothing; Actuarial science; Public economics; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.09382239497470354,"score_gpt":0.40470605893728356,"score_spread":0.31088366396258005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2463671667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81146985,0.0013986251,0.09410075,0.010602628,0.00017282007,0.000059132195,0.00012309232,0.00007394014,0.08199911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955818,0.00016924774,0.003023827,0.0003648997,0.000043213004,0.00001507364,0.000016799255,0.000014560105,0.0007705734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975362,0.0012186922,0.00008744819,0.00046327306,0.00043407377,0.00026045134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98162526,0.012227875,0.0030123862,0.0017437978,0.00057855406,0.0008121401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034081533,0.00040450884,0.0005179516,0.0006902132,0.0007329548,0.0035914876,0.00074490445,0.0016199457,0.004581608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02810815,0.00039939163,0.00046266243,0.000616281,0.003240613,0.004239135,0.002127121,0.0019418261,0.00024083453],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016171089,0.00045200283,0.085041344,0.00060319225,0.00045735794,0.001687814,0.010857503,0.025109282,0.015179097,0.6902473,0.0046081427,0.16413994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057722624,0.00012236113,0.038541265,0.0000651656,0.00010275098,0.00042956215,0.0011309223,0.027082542,0.0012929748,0.92732674,0.0037831708,0.000064695916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013602044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011432747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004581608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012153474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006055428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018024206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472982715","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.002","title":"Using future thinking to reduce temporal discounting: Under what circumstances are the medial temporal lobes critical?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neuropsychologia","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs","keywords":"Temporal discounting; Psychology; Intertemporal choice; Cognitive psychology; Task (project management); Contrast (vision); Discounting; Semantic memory; Cognition; Temporal lobe; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Impulsivity; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.21821238537149978,"score_gpt":0.4535331950295583,"score_spread":0.23532080965805852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2472982715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9486081,0.0010460598,0.036442894,0.0039844355,0.0001966553,0.000047925983,0.000113098205,0.00014613234,0.009414713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852011,0.00067553425,0.01232735,0.00036938288,0.00008116602,0.00002656573,0.000060004324,0.00009434173,0.0011644178],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997861,0.00005404036,0.000020102618,0.000047284946,0.00006332587,0.000029149918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997912,0.0010619728,0.00040387613,0.00029921383,0.00010114809,0.0002218083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012115828,0.00037806894,0.00025188277,0.00020336879,0.00016457653,0.0010416217,0.000450611,0.00051808637,0.003673289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070458082,0.00021471918,0.0002196405,0.00013972052,0.000696457,0.0016025931,0.00039800303,0.0010619543,0.00032898423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007815972,0.0020572094,0.0265895,0.0006883777,0.00048776178,0.00092395913,0.0010938706,0.0044479165,0.56516194,0.039625786,0.0025046733,0.3486031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029830956,0.0053249593,0.10464027,0.000395504,0.0013939025,0.003915486,0.00101598,0.07774549,0.42182553,0.36005482,0.020535294,0.00016967302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059682835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077146373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003673289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032158612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007037544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012288392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480743960","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511753855.001","title":"Introduction and Motivation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Las vegas; Sight; Subject (documents); Psychology; Investment (military); Visual arts; History; Art; Art history; Advertising; Media studies; Social psychology; Business; Sociology; Political science; Law; Archaeology; Library science; Computer science; Astronomy; Physics","score_opus":0.07643632243748538,"score_gpt":0.2673435209262421,"score_spread":0.1909071984887567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480743960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072180177,0.017178938,0.008824433,0.05154271,0.006492813,0.00025272477,0.0022907648,0.00031563616,0.90588397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045172956,0.015460307,0.006326936,0.02778692,0.0044076038,0.00043179974,0.0019287327,0.00024642484,0.8982384],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999253,0.00016028188,0.000033549262,0.00020805253,0.00024055607,0.00010455773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987394,0.0005221322,0.00007851951,0.00007613777,0.00027313558,0.00031065496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011184957,0.0006356824,0.00049394433,0.00084323995,0.0017930195,0.004315911,0.001316929,0.002860436,0.1568484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037152343,0.00026668425,0.0003042502,0.001241228,0.0014558067,0.004336076,0.0019335487,0.0032487155,0.06532429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045742574,0.00017078161,0.0007943578,0.0003165,0.0000035215612,0.00022579373,0.0025869524,0.00013640121,0.00031547446,0.35320625,0.55095744,0.09124071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043552027,0.000018469435,0.00044107996,0.00018963631,0.0000010507956,0.00019234803,0.0004670081,0.000045081164,0.000040135194,0.02960479,0.96899086,0.000005244762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011104536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014980664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1568484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013566447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014031917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5247102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494441066","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1973","title":"Real‐World Correlates of Performance on Heuristics and Biases Tasks in a Community Sample","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Heuristics; Psychology; Debiasing; Sample (material); Discounting; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.21325087115341906,"score_gpt":0.44435378110373414,"score_spread":0.23110290995031507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494441066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997304,0.00001734845,0.00003558296,0.00000905909,0.0000013692803,0.000005655469,0.0000518312,8.0296036e-7,0.0001479756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996105,0.000021574899,0.00008656914,0.000016443913,0.0000029999278,0.000007681059,0.000106707026,0.0000011900352,0.00014645292],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959546,0.000099393925,0.0000474788,0.000082210034,0.00011224602,0.00006329079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975459,0.00038373872,0.00096443197,0.00019868178,0.0004482434,0.00045902462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065724854,0.0002793318,0.0002624234,0.0009970883,0.0006774576,0.00084711163,0.0002738624,0.00043117296,0.0020197518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045101694,0.0002566624,0.0002317054,0.00062994676,0.00046465243,0.00054072955,0.00062494393,0.0007050971,0.00034949087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006890976,0.0002141802,0.9967528,0.0000067698224,0.00002175824,0.000050940707,0.0005445404,0.000027236085,0.0003338192,0.000022298003,0.00007726946,0.0018794718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006540225,0.0001723295,0.9982785,0.000004361494,0.000008505661,0.00020483184,0.0008145185,0.00016881916,0.00012500193,0.00007470238,0.00013469953,0.0000072172215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004642591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007283559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004642591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016073683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019539187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00923115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497821641","doi":"10.1257/jel.20191074","title":"Measuring Time Preferences","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Literature","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":342,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.21924297714334431,"score_gpt":0.35869804835454944,"score_spread":0.13945507121120512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2497821641","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27152142,0.2035902,0.3007506,0.009368607,0.0017815134,0.00049789686,0.007697948,0.0005059045,0.20428586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77259046,0.10897881,0.0956752,0.002863493,0.0013238643,0.0007081254,0.004923058,0.0002017758,0.012735188],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972161,0.0014135776,0.00019274521,0.0004175902,0.0006523112,0.00010768694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97811997,0.014791397,0.0036346202,0.001117457,0.0018739323,0.0004627011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035507693,0.0007677184,0.00048753008,0.0019547206,0.00041263053,0.0021346342,0.0006045094,0.00086512417,0.011000983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030505072,0.00021476443,0.0005827836,0.0029393437,0.00072376867,0.0036721844,0.00071960705,0.0008593934,0.0023735114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000632134,0.0004521296,0.05566272,0.0042879577,0.00051424117,0.00009907928,0.001101696,0.0062057646,0.0039007633,0.14339721,0.019222444,0.76452386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101267535,0.0015438902,0.15834427,0.005683434,0.0008094719,0.0014164222,0.003944477,0.0129397595,0.010336408,0.4407729,0.36374202,0.00036571207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010712326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00135503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011000983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009370016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041716103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036801994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507592882","doi":"10.1080/17470218.2016.1220608","title":"The Role of Memory in Distinguishing Risky Decisions from Experience and Description","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Gambling Research Institute, University of Calgary; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Preference; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Contrast (vision); Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09820338050898196,"score_gpt":0.42284477524123165,"score_spread":0.3246413947322497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507592882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954169,0.0003671517,0.0022803901,0.00005609534,0.000018595829,0.00005682314,0.00006419505,0.0000119911965,0.0017278095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979845,0.0001802242,0.0013702683,0.000044152195,0.000014502975,0.000039695333,0.000070450995,0.00000639857,0.00028985352],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983494,0.0006202904,0.00021863548,0.0002579248,0.00038547997,0.00016821979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757086,0.016216733,0.0043180888,0.0022089381,0.00071376865,0.0008338131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039177495,0.00045704356,0.00057665294,0.00076621136,0.00032019417,0.00206536,0.00035908615,0.0007770978,0.0022260076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030666143,0.00042378233,0.00048152648,0.0004369879,0.00092406024,0.0022577087,0.0011329185,0.00078567077,0.0001840794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01808547,0.002719333,0.6043551,0.0014457076,0.0014047971,0.0008090411,0.0101347,0.0034159021,0.07899992,0.0041014054,0.0006116169,0.27391705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002796607,0.00458198,0.96048343,0.00020407524,0.00056874385,0.0010267191,0.0018518002,0.004574915,0.013625597,0.011421739,0.0011895841,0.00019167583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060084555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009708942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039177495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028175456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032689702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02071929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509303870","doi":"10.1007/s40614-016-0070-9","title":"Automating Scoring of Delay Discounting for the 21- and 27-Item Monetary Choice Questionnaires","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Behavior Analyst","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":221,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Delay discounting; Discounting; Psychology; Computer science; Actuarial science; Information retrieval; Econometrics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.1248767971500037,"score_gpt":0.4031964225730444,"score_spread":0.2783196254230407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509303870","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48159716,0.0003789425,0.48766705,0.0003582992,0.00038685597,0.0061903982,0.003457907,0.0116923405,0.008271093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45569262,0.0003384998,0.52879006,0.00032901572,0.0001494812,0.0057363687,0.0022906323,0.0012764187,0.0053968085],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906707,0.0049129543,0.0009655015,0.0011856632,0.00180838,0.00045684367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95927525,0.027369834,0.0024187448,0.0031671526,0.0070162993,0.00075268693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013607882,0.0010575076,0.0012897071,0.0025514427,0.00031624569,0.0012103117,0.00094293884,0.000641274,0.0070462553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04923965,0.00055165676,0.0006687552,0.0012009243,0.00025776398,0.00063596206,0.0010174342,0.0009541843,0.00348379],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004724186,0.0012717606,0.11004492,0.0005177359,0.0002680487,0.00017540381,0.0015931838,0.004199775,0.0749614,0.0034993635,0.017493276,0.7812509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007320109,0.0020950297,0.61018026,0.0002195058,0.00035671503,0.0008687511,0.0011218741,0.2382311,0.104342915,0.011425892,0.029964529,0.00046150468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027564738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006181974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013607882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057734037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013547487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07196617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514022131","doi":"10.1177/0956797616660292","title":"Overcorrection for Social-Categorization Information Moderates Impact Bias in Affective Forecasting","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Categorization; Social psychology; Plural; Contrast (vision); Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.40417393064927354,"score_gpt":0.5095409729379052,"score_spread":0.1053670422886317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514022131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99800783,0.00003410612,0.0006862586,0.00005496656,0.000012040285,0.000013934458,0.000017051801,0.000013840135,0.0011599608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844664,0.00003438532,0.0009802569,0.000049247366,0.000008591477,0.000016752587,0.000036541875,0.000014041215,0.0004135522],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998228,0.00070633565,0.00014520805,0.00025082906,0.0005054743,0.00016417955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9739759,0.015728416,0.004681247,0.0037359796,0.0008538772,0.0010246966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031137737,0.00029013125,0.0003664475,0.00025480203,0.00033999086,0.0012755898,0.00026616507,0.00056802935,0.0021106878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024558827,0.00027930093,0.00017523472,0.00019441289,0.00065954326,0.000778014,0.00085102255,0.0010570644,0.00016948006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012435274,0.004190708,0.28600162,0.00060113735,0.00055645977,0.0004301112,0.00757486,0.010408211,0.542295,0.004019082,0.0014706982,0.13001683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039690168,0.004975954,0.811068,0.0001365796,0.0004556793,0.000346031,0.0020208696,0.043618303,0.12011928,0.011876907,0.004808416,0.00017708256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013798678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019760157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031137737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045382677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045686497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016467392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516226452","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2819538","title":"Revisiting Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Risk aversion (psychology); Economics; Inequity aversion; Business; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Financial economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematics","score_opus":0.023165262412725034,"score_gpt":0.3248897808150281,"score_spread":0.3017245184023031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516226452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43418765,0.007916193,0.29574156,0.031494465,0.0011018536,0.00017658758,0.0002767753,0.00018638404,0.22891848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767809,0.0017775143,0.010604265,0.0015578863,0.0005243285,0.00004266608,0.000023739074,0.00004016223,0.008648604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981256,0.00079146354,0.00009621736,0.00032303014,0.00044132443,0.0002223597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703523,0.023485648,0.0021583347,0.0021199554,0.0013266425,0.0005571179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005651662,0.0010486161,0.001349976,0.0012405183,0.00068608805,0.003091762,0.0016420222,0.002536922,0.013956386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02920329,0.00054141786,0.000967479,0.0008919274,0.0042740465,0.008878405,0.0025243498,0.005075503,0.00051267527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015950458,0.00029581046,0.0026116124,0.00026687852,0.00007951053,0.00019987972,0.00037524768,0.005631749,0.00090476737,0.9498341,0.0017794889,0.03786157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041704796,0.000053075102,0.0015997889,0.00006349508,0.000048842085,0.000055445656,0.000105877276,0.0075415443,0.00029279882,0.9880734,0.0021049166,0.000018939207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012354197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00115128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013956386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085705053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010845796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046688795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518772759","doi":"10.1002/cb.1602","title":"Prey positions as consumers' behavioural patterns: Exploratory evidence from an<i>f</i>MRI study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Behaviour","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Sainte-Anne","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Position (finance); Predator; Exploratory research; Economics; Psychology; Ecology; Biology; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.19337469025723347,"score_gpt":0.4288435930485069,"score_spread":0.23546890279127342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518772759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99936265,0.00005598943,0.00007082744,0.000038347254,0.0000011833309,0.000008600656,0.000036679878,0.0000012999583,0.00042445937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990073,0.00009134921,0.00031020236,0.00008675204,0.000008682202,0.000020225996,0.00006330883,0.0000029902021,0.00040926214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969196,0.00013927238,0.000015467036,0.000058744077,0.00005585751,0.000038649618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727196,0.0015052073,0.00067992014,0.00016974327,0.00017403578,0.00019908063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012285507,0.00024391516,0.00025388636,0.000619286,0.00052465434,0.0007902578,0.00030212363,0.00093377853,0.0029054638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003837878,0.00027420436,0.0003530471,0.000462507,0.0008384427,0.0007701361,0.00065446796,0.0006553018,0.00033078823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040459274,0.003017096,0.9107724,0.0003468375,0.0002555067,0.0015898645,0.036499616,0.0001960288,0.016617665,0.0005450271,0.0013647045,0.024749354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029946521,0.0015960226,0.9851317,0.000027856186,0.000055209563,0.0005789453,0.010122202,0.00040208755,0.0008871618,0.00030528937,0.0008260268,0.00003754481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002679934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037474798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029054638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021427334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011599609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009719729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519771210","doi":"","title":"Implicit conflict detection during decision making","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Judgement; Normative; Heuristic; Psychology; Dual process theory (moral psychology); Heuristics; Computer science; Process (computing); Epistemology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04811611547224001,"score_gpt":0.3239436281433746,"score_spread":0.2758275126711346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519771210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93612766,0.0007667352,0.050817173,0.00036758528,0.00012268581,0.00017297661,0.00016369805,0.00021639983,0.011245052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98448354,0.00017145608,0.013930271,0.00007679839,0.00003707959,0.000104504885,0.00013506341,0.000044938246,0.0010163815],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927511,0.0030724148,0.0004186531,0.0011664842,0.002198679,0.00039250488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95759887,0.03083376,0.005224541,0.0031207588,0.0023970343,0.0008250873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058294116,0.00064038445,0.0008265427,0.0010154969,0.0005022225,0.002919183,0.0012047591,0.0010740357,0.0030077584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08317593,0.0005592289,0.00032667333,0.0009439397,0.0008128784,0.0037665085,0.0020791711,0.002085741,0.00051174057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01004858,0.0013566199,0.08293172,0.0021651005,0.00049132574,0.00083402393,0.042755194,0.0075405836,0.22603223,0.040937208,0.0025278237,0.5823796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009937692,0.003938868,0.43480343,0.0008125222,0.00068266434,0.00234375,0.007826133,0.17736362,0.15533687,0.1906703,0.024435258,0.00079283013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007745144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062542147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058294116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066752435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000735644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03082925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521607795","doi":"10.1002/jeab.221","title":"Syntax for calculation of discounting indices from the monetary choice questionnaire and probability discounting questionnaire","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Homewood Research Institute; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Discounting; Syntax; Delay discounting; Psychology; Computer science; Econometrics; Statistics; Natural language processing; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.06276410873205995,"score_gpt":0.38243569543229355,"score_spread":0.3196715867002336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521607795","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020471387,0.000686612,0.3635351,0.0015253839,0.0015897086,0.011971885,0.44892105,0.11892902,0.032369863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052468263,0.00071794185,0.6747761,0.0013073795,0.00039474622,0.04827823,0.14294444,0.04962929,0.029483726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99447364,0.0019308648,0.0015679371,0.0006730828,0.0011105979,0.00024393026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94653034,0.040148564,0.002894626,0.0034995377,0.006493122,0.00043380173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008176985,0.002410824,0.0016565599,0.0033340459,0.00052962103,0.0020536997,0.0017725283,0.0008573989,0.24285236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073364675,0.0012834967,0.0021383648,0.0028854252,0.00046299133,0.0020701136,0.0018594223,0.002989736,0.0779683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002459563,0.0006758183,0.008647149,0.0026794814,0.0002694066,0.00036436477,0.0010745113,0.0031449625,0.002831823,0.013036866,0.6266817,0.33813435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001866548,0.0009416339,0.044262256,0.0019442791,0.00041350164,0.0010074165,0.0009271617,0.023201989,0.015605147,0.06927237,0.83990026,0.00065735326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016037388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001790743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24285236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009779106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016633589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8124221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522022217","doi":"","title":"Issues in Reasoning about Iffy Propositions: Reasoning Times in the Syntactic-Semantic Counter-Example Prompted Probabilistic Thinking and Reasoning Engine","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Vlaamse regering","keywords":"Semantic reasoner; Psychology of reasoning; Context (archaeology); Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Probabilistic logic; Relation (database); Computer science; Notation; Inference; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Model-based reasoning; Social psychology","score_opus":0.028542884892998943,"score_gpt":0.2890227040419,"score_spread":0.26047981914890106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522022217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817825,0.00021520103,0.011350306,0.00018973574,0.000041070816,0.00009558572,0.00013989862,0.00013650079,0.006049249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864829,0.00010249114,0.011376051,0.000105175604,0.000014681604,0.0001368174,0.00033864667,0.00010749372,0.0013356928],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954182,0.0018920086,0.00041100546,0.0009705318,0.001104042,0.00020424144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85476804,0.13004068,0.007930052,0.004328371,0.0016088713,0.0013239598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009678563,0.00039655174,0.0005044263,0.00067255535,0.0003642222,0.0025350475,0.00089841476,0.0013956219,0.00728407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14732996,0.00087601005,0.0005807998,0.0005417309,0.00067631516,0.005236456,0.001120119,0.0019409696,0.0007299025],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03448203,0.003841046,0.22553591,0.0011824085,0.00070448796,0.0018724031,0.023045732,0.03082224,0.15106131,0.045170274,0.0039488003,0.47833332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002033743,0.004817516,0.57083184,0.00026511544,0.00090017123,0.0036400466,0.0027542822,0.2252643,0.06765063,0.11159958,0.0095347,0.00070814387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014084217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011999867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009678563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008860902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006724845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051185727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523751968","doi":"10.1007/s40473-016-0091-4","title":"Age-Related Changes in Decision Making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Cognition; Gratification; Valuation (finance); Social decision making; Temporal discounting; Psychology; Fluid and crystallized intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Gerontology; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Fluid intelligence; Social psychology; Impulsivity; Economics; Working memory; Neuroscience; Finance","score_opus":0.21978105729145067,"score_gpt":0.46111105725226886,"score_spread":0.2413299999608182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523751968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99754804,0.00047229364,0.00040728718,0.00006627146,0.000034270604,0.000007296472,0.00032183065,0.000008092317,0.0011347529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973126,0.0004268044,0.00029752278,0.00004782949,0.000023881048,0.000009016942,0.000280327,0.0000071806353,0.0015949414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984634,0.00002412968,0.000017485327,0.000051331837,0.000029293751,0.00003136383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976653,0.00076400064,0.00075040193,0.0003104789,0.00025451425,0.0002552491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006256889,0.00020073337,0.00025356535,0.00032679015,0.00010454627,0.00043868076,0.00012563296,0.0004075731,0.0037387826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003766589,0.00012916824,0.0002182504,0.00024298298,0.00019397645,0.0005216706,0.00021948515,0.0005543063,0.0006181876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012087075,0.0027578943,0.66001225,0.00031805213,0.00039278838,0.0009212425,0.001560255,0.0027925596,0.22299196,0.0026555464,0.0024663676,0.09104404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024752104,0.0010747943,0.986074,0.000016442904,0.00007098779,0.00036938168,0.00018226905,0.0008861445,0.008104908,0.0015871803,0.0015880351,0.00002097773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073425093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066996185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037387826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017827011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014805628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012507498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524837122","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000219","title":"Fair lineups are better than biased lineups and showups, but not because they increase underlying discriminability.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Receiver operating characteristic; Cognitive psychology; Response bias; Social psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.20282528885544238,"score_gpt":0.39262399924833863,"score_spread":0.18979871039289625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524837122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8391294,0.002245321,0.08958979,0.0030379598,0.00044518453,0.00051942794,0.0017514217,0.001261927,0.062019538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795584,0.00028081774,0.017024817,0.0006904134,0.00009035773,0.00012281118,0.00044624356,0.0001384882,0.0016476298],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869933,0.006153883,0.0010501643,0.0022778804,0.0027735461,0.0007511688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8921093,0.07334367,0.014547625,0.01435851,0.0029370952,0.0027037591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017294964,0.000995339,0.0011969084,0.0022286165,0.0007516637,0.0033278277,0.0006877797,0.002077754,0.015189705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13467583,0.00031705023,0.0012012521,0.0014514385,0.003051626,0.006158167,0.0028879317,0.0015398646,0.0017779642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0071296385,0.0015374697,0.32080427,0.0017688288,0.002630859,0.00079406577,0.0031172552,0.016510177,0.022404343,0.13593094,0.016468784,0.47090346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042367177,0.0065209335,0.4629451,0.00066845934,0.0008922695,0.002155375,0.0027152733,0.0469919,0.02335235,0.4311584,0.021787025,0.00038915328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040648918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006184239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017294964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086841657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005288049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09146559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525468836","doi":"10.1111/caje.12272","title":"Applying behavioural economics to public policy in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Behavioural economics; Behavioral economics; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Public economics; Field (mathematics); Economics; Behavioural sciences; Point (geometry); Positive economics; Term (time); Sociology; Social science; Economic growth; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.39801464866439673,"score_gpt":0.2939995836760854,"score_spread":0.10401506498831131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525468836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41036275,0.012011189,0.040716678,0.15886962,0.0006876841,0.00092121045,0.0055419384,0.0003164186,0.37057245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738427,0.0036431055,0.007576778,0.0017849915,0.00004707937,0.000090530724,0.00037959582,0.000024956544,0.012610183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99534166,0.00151974,0.00012367086,0.0003713041,0.0012024369,0.0014412368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99057883,0.0042601656,0.00050040416,0.00038300594,0.0032131423,0.0010644539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068415776,0.0005331394,0.0007749031,0.0026515105,0.0058565782,0.007349565,0.0019707314,0.0019102214,0.0057271887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015927633,0.00039746234,0.00097412965,0.0058831624,0.005200425,0.0017361748,0.0023494756,0.002317912,0.00019632131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010185433,0.0001250236,0.03189421,0.00025622174,0.0001164526,0.00029412366,0.0037972443,0.06663097,0.00022219699,0.83387804,0.023265723,0.03941785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016246323,0.00013147159,0.08961257,0.00094214274,0.00024927364,0.0000994871,0.016772352,0.21774112,0.00082003075,0.39977336,0.27327386,0.00042188552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24955456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24955456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2385956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8704103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529127485","doi":"","title":"A Comparison of Survey and Incentivized-Based Risk Attitude Elicitation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loss aversion; Survey data collection; Risk aversion (psychology); Dimension (graph theory); Contrast (vision); Survey instrument; Actuarial science; Sample (material); Order (exchange); Survey research; Economics; Psychology; Marketing; Business; Expected utility hypothesis; Microeconomics; Computer science; Financial economics; Applied psychology; Statistics; Finance; Mathematics","score_opus":0.26478450062057535,"score_gpt":0.49810771106326446,"score_spread":0.2333232104426891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529127485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96173584,0.00014256132,0.024580192,0.0003299629,0.000055467575,0.0020116977,0.0008561138,0.00023596604,0.010052241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9561259,0.00027955935,0.034545254,0.0003948055,0.00004879618,0.0032121637,0.0010173738,0.000060148053,0.004316064],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.96982366,0.023287764,0.0012774309,0.0014624917,0.0034208852,0.0007278089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7822135,0.18868421,0.009898963,0.011488305,0.0064715063,0.0012434751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020731606,0.000695834,0.0009329804,0.000984731,0.0004888209,0.0013740027,0.001249619,0.001597729,0.0066092005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10221514,0.00043222215,0.00043678883,0.0013013397,0.00066646124,0.0014719962,0.0017998257,0.0008976018,0.000968468],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07037018,0.043467432,0.17591532,0.0036753695,0.0011673929,0.0003064321,0.015336792,0.025209203,0.063175455,0.016887318,0.0044527166,0.5800364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01133677,0.059665028,0.63901967,0.0006237338,0.0010104487,0.00052815484,0.012207769,0.12928796,0.09408723,0.01886643,0.032235183,0.0011316274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005668029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004329368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020731606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014103485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001692239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10964054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529875532","doi":"10.1007/s40881-016-0028-4","title":"Simulating power of economic experiments: the powerBBK package","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Economic Science Association","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"R package; Computer science; Statistical power; Nonparametric statistics; Power (physics); Binary number; Sample (material); Sample size determination; Parametric statistics; Design of experiments; Statistics; Mathematics; Programming language; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.0701657254449491,"score_gpt":0.3999832397105319,"score_spread":0.3298175142655828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529875532","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006129177,0.00043092572,0.9255352,0.0010634881,0.00042286664,0.0011613001,0.016584033,0.03737915,0.011293744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10255266,0.00071618083,0.8406003,0.0013270451,0.00022665056,0.015760722,0.009466001,0.021509038,0.007841407],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914204,0.0062964647,0.000472859,0.0005738138,0.0009233349,0.00031307995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8939522,0.09565826,0.002323491,0.0048352936,0.0026792537,0.00055148365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022619564,0.0014098777,0.0019256868,0.0015639137,0.00056560175,0.00245649,0.0029216963,0.0017785642,0.070757136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.101732716,0.0016072531,0.0024449644,0.0016577858,0.0009494215,0.002275025,0.0027247586,0.0035727662,0.011086935],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017975593,0.00049903407,0.008301338,0.00406462,0.0017072938,0.0004630463,0.00084640546,0.35983232,0.0021375157,0.20284362,0.2589965,0.1585108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001674149,0.00025859603,0.0020338777,0.0006901431,0.00036113348,0.00019422272,0.0000772088,0.605588,0.003959637,0.26484087,0.12017192,0.00015027175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026572251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020241588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070757136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001138872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002684221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2367062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530427207","doi":"10.1037/xap0000103","title":"Where are you? The effect of uncertainty and its visual representation on location judgments in GPS-like displays.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Glyph (data visualization); Visualization; Computer science; Global Positioning System; Task (project management); Consistency (knowledge bases); Representation (politics); Artificial intelligence; Function (biology); Data mining; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07382892655086758,"score_gpt":0.45521778432738835,"score_spread":0.38138885777652076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530427207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98649746,0.00087269174,0.005492544,0.00053526927,0.000059998874,0.000055729175,0.00012797207,0.000089262605,0.0062691504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945294,0.00027323887,0.004403288,0.00014909988,0.000017249691,0.000046413123,0.00006257606,0.000025985246,0.0004927899],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979388,0.0012815533,0.00011458807,0.00031848633,0.00025665763,0.00008996359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94991076,0.044603683,0.0033410222,0.00085792353,0.00081132306,0.00047530103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031973484,0.00058419124,0.00030623726,0.00039528566,0.00033540736,0.0023624047,0.00048777548,0.0015860405,0.0044053905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08723981,0.00034228823,0.00032202763,0.0003108884,0.00075481844,0.003373198,0.0011427396,0.00081937754,0.00037910836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02477262,0.0016261324,0.23280975,0.0041590077,0.0009827388,0.0038000657,0.12134826,0.011937784,0.24716277,0.020808905,0.011548685,0.3190433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001134969,0.008547857,0.6868109,0.0017809463,0.0014559495,0.0030366494,0.06445112,0.07213373,0.056320887,0.074409254,0.029012505,0.0009052619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010997709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010764598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044053905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002980991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017241301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01690936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552328639","doi":"10.1037/xhp0000295","title":"I saw mine first: A prior-entry effect for newly acquired ownership.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Construal level theory; Set (abstract data type); Perception; Task (project management); Salient; Prioritization; PsycINFO; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.12476146052057435,"score_gpt":0.44907770091408916,"score_spread":0.3243162403935148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552328639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99233055,0.00022673547,0.0018096298,0.0001380226,0.000021232929,0.000055616667,0.00019742188,0.00005920058,0.0051617427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960674,0.000118244294,0.0016093849,0.000096798714,0.0000145520435,0.00003188654,0.00024164452,0.000042885364,0.0017770244],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792296,0.00039379072,0.00019866401,0.00062187185,0.0007001031,0.00016260041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9402443,0.03795083,0.012702676,0.005169289,0.0009968966,0.0029359858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033314722,0.0003133409,0.00061379146,0.0005669008,0.00028694107,0.0013026996,0.0007281836,0.0008889253,0.01194668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03427707,0.00051288964,0.0005666691,0.00026931838,0.0010895696,0.002039214,0.0019310539,0.0018365452,0.00052225793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01748481,0.0040607117,0.5719176,0.0013877451,0.0006763004,0.001761352,0.005367214,0.00088474905,0.2622636,0.0050149793,0.0021092144,0.12707166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010041903,0.0020221106,0.9799691,0.00012104648,0.00020983382,0.0011751959,0.00043319337,0.0019198583,0.010551133,0.002136253,0.0013113401,0.000050613133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093363755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023626497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01194668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003856152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036497434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03996563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565010868","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v9n1p32","title":"Risk Aversion and Emotions in DoND","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Risk aversion (psychology); Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Reading (process); Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Cognition; Test (biology); Social psychology; Arrow; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Computer science; Expected utility hypothesis; Sociology; Financial economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.05538877908435775,"score_gpt":0.33752805195733837,"score_spread":0.28213927287298063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565010868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99260277,0.00013833407,0.0005980012,0.000097627286,0.000013311624,0.0000115783505,0.000021383865,0.0000036618978,0.0065134503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991567,0.00002956897,0.0001278638,0.000028759301,0.0000042676656,0.0000069818884,0.000012538942,9.228058e-7,0.0006323538],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922526,0.0003685156,0.000044081167,0.0000975368,0.00016693497,0.000097712116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783164,0.0009080079,0.00058376015,0.00015105406,0.00017278723,0.0003526877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012615211,0.00019926766,0.00022433935,0.0004614125,0.00046582986,0.0011998066,0.0001525065,0.00030493728,0.0025087628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005988034,0.00008747297,0.00018517683,0.0002231279,0.00055944105,0.00021564757,0.00072519784,0.0006544109,0.00019739494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019474773,0.0024344597,0.8854388,0.00016807321,0.00017330855,0.0011185785,0.010930648,0.0021517975,0.017420707,0.013378978,0.0011324522,0.063704856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000489869,0.0006369686,0.96904033,0.00004874067,0.000060701856,0.000994054,0.0059418306,0.0051652207,0.0021864134,0.010598774,0.005231302,0.00004674893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061079575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046356788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025087628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005590199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015351671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008392632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566721998","doi":"10.3758/s13421-016-0680-1","title":"When fast logic meets slow belief: Evidence for a parallel-processing model of belief bias","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung; Max-Planck-Gesellschaft; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Syllogism; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Converse; Deductive reasoning; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.4927859558913508,"score_gpt":0.43612724901111766,"score_spread":0.05665870688023317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566721998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9695574,0.00025632037,0.014308685,0.0014116429,0.00011596624,0.00019984669,0.00023576818,0.00021775835,0.013696622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99185973,0.00008512287,0.0059640263,0.0009668977,0.000065676686,0.00013614574,0.00016363856,0.00011683863,0.0006420144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919212,0.0030491652,0.0006191061,0.0017106616,0.0020519835,0.0006479837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8185247,0.13083589,0.019461876,0.02253132,0.0055871466,0.0030590098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016025003,0.00050948444,0.0009583452,0.0010319636,0.000462975,0.0031215423,0.0015402018,0.002823868,0.009188587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14188698,0.0012368155,0.0006198023,0.00066366413,0.00317986,0.0065541104,0.003040735,0.003077176,0.00088634813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06462759,0.011235036,0.31108716,0.0035440496,0.0015592161,0.002181462,0.018982293,0.009548082,0.23487711,0.124679744,0.0058254246,0.21185294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009027,0.005763846,0.45232064,0.0002816753,0.000999415,0.0023316375,0.0019453081,0.073313765,0.06377735,0.3827163,0.0068464987,0.00067661726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015037118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089129485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016025003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008114939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008154922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08474934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566905302","doi":"10.1093/ije/dyw303","title":"Commentary: Delay discounting and smoking: robust correlation, but uncertain causation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"International Journal of Epidemiology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton; Homewood Research Institute","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Medical Research Council; National Institute on Drug Abuse; British Heart Foundation; Cancer Research UK","keywords":"Causation; Delay discounting; Correlation; Discounting; Econometrics; Medicine; Psychology; Economics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.22101501544916968,"score_gpt":0.43657620373116784,"score_spread":0.21556118828199816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566905302","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013108323,0.00055316434,0.000091838956,0.98193675,0.016525432,0.000008652532,0.00011009477,0.000011692605,0.0006312114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028269957,0.00051615806,0.00020598718,0.91740316,0.07743111,0.000047182624,0.000035043755,0.000018073508,0.0015163287],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902261,0.0038571886,0.0013632328,0.0017877376,0.0021052808,0.0006603537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8970444,0.08565869,0.0047958368,0.002284838,0.0073697637,0.0028463686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013765425,0.0016100361,0.0036547156,0.0017041585,0.00439716,0.0048375595,0.00652228,0.11752982,0.010829895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14848416,0.0014418145,0.0028907037,0.0019412449,0.0060840696,0.0061688838,0.0021602765,0.077597894,0.008793565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001424525,0.000021560012,0.00034952612,0.00012340116,0.00007111551,0.0008921131,0.00014646762,0.00007382956,0.00006838329,0.004568969,0.98975384,0.0037883702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010722633,0.00017458454,0.0022796406,0.002141014,0.0005060615,0.0030868005,0.00086711807,0.0024058742,0.00046414722,0.105555296,0.88115686,0.00029042186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012994204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013504259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11752982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063737035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00662749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072799385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567193265","doi":"10.32469/10355/48706","title":"A new measure of economic voting : priority heuristic theory and combining sociotropic and egocentric evaluations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Ideology; Positive economics; Construct (python library); Dimension (graph theory); Scale (ratio); Economics; Public economics; Politics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.11540770507840299,"score_gpt":0.44780017047485926,"score_spread":0.3323924653964563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567193265","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29708746,0.0012995339,0.60390997,0.000813873,0.00025250606,0.0006078102,0.00059748546,0.00023015158,0.095201306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89536315,0.00029180487,0.10184088,0.00011435113,0.00010743433,0.00025212794,0.00038808133,0.000026881773,0.0016151884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960484,0.0014565901,0.00030629226,0.00044727503,0.0014858388,0.00025555777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920304,0.0043745716,0.0013041153,0.00077877776,0.001117524,0.00039453612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004442671,0.00055367424,0.0005563892,0.005461268,0.00065257767,0.003053816,0.000954367,0.00068295834,0.0039543705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021854095,0.00020906083,0.0009001889,0.0040962026,0.0018190355,0.0046049757,0.0016494995,0.0013523,0.00033723013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004785704,0.00044685922,0.07383923,0.00048045858,0.0003181192,0.00018947483,0.0025049218,0.012457976,0.0031771336,0.5167174,0.003144277,0.38624552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014903175,0.0011027288,0.15915382,0.00036127324,0.00029841278,0.0005349407,0.00401592,0.12133575,0.0041633486,0.68659335,0.022071674,0.00021973455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011293208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011451576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005461268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015142924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010417928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023495376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2570591202","doi":"10.1509/jmr.15.0277","title":"Seller Beware: How Bundling Affects Valuation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Bundle; Gestalt psychology; Psychology; Microeconomics; Business; Social psychology; Perception; Marketing; Economics","score_opus":0.5843134779325335,"score_gpt":0.5673092169627209,"score_spread":0.017004260969812668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2570591202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690908,0.0003440584,0.0032636847,0.0008657979,0.000032341628,0.0000233338,0.000031163236,0.000026680435,0.026322022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983442,0.0000606636,0.00072031806,0.00007886607,0.000011723949,0.000005500252,0.000020872612,0.000010537592,0.0007473248],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983525,0.00085233117,0.00007181418,0.0002062612,0.0003921062,0.00012494755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763032,0.0163269,0.0031838429,0.001799151,0.001160658,0.0012262067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038843772,0.00025180928,0.00047679094,0.0005353749,0.0008620256,0.0038659354,0.00037842753,0.0010379659,0.009886295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030788558,0.00033050828,0.0004368207,0.00042096426,0.0011818599,0.0045478493,0.0011757525,0.0012470155,0.0005832279],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005636879,0.004039687,0.60569143,0.0006760839,0.00088523474,0.0018278646,0.010789962,0.0075276163,0.03313284,0.10891337,0.0043546087,0.21652439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005197979,0.0023996916,0.79079163,0.00018724006,0.00084578653,0.0009147932,0.006473497,0.021465905,0.006516037,0.16013609,0.009585588,0.0001638955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009937471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006448316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009886295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010298127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039081354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03307295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572242965","doi":"","title":"Explicit Bayesian Reasoning with Frequencies, Probabilities, and Surprisals","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Prior probability; Bayes' theorem; Bayesian probability; Conditional probability; Bayes factor; Posterior probability; Bayesian inference; Frequentist probability; Statistics; Bayesian statistics; Prime (order theory); Mathematics; Marginal likelihood; Psychology; Econometrics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.07400849366733225,"score_gpt":0.27318333325891253,"score_spread":0.19917483959158028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572242965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92941767,0.0002979399,0.05688271,0.00072151603,0.000040627183,0.00006239159,0.000100302015,0.00013695822,0.012339766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98420864,0.00008961662,0.014981018,0.00012495831,0.000018644665,0.000047831913,0.00006092113,0.00002769474,0.0004407195],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99256223,0.0042146854,0.0004226966,0.0007789836,0.0018528731,0.0001685956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8862661,0.09089356,0.011839587,0.0085330345,0.0015289313,0.0009387251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073572574,0.0005111112,0.0004156168,0.00047246699,0.00028373048,0.0036648365,0.0007057784,0.0012179507,0.004490729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10721084,0.00060477335,0.00046219258,0.00041557834,0.0023442016,0.004551488,0.001569794,0.0029249291,0.0003392266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007597458,0.003435935,0.17270829,0.0018190416,0.0009648064,0.0005889964,0.018808397,0.07803447,0.15648675,0.20819165,0.002828415,0.34853584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071145996,0.0022693009,0.22637284,0.00038733752,0.0004782177,0.00069675455,0.0019379569,0.1588683,0.03122274,0.57115847,0.0054336344,0.00046305076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042007735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046959132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073572574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005999214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038667078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038909376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580805489","doi":"10.19041/apstract/2016/2-3/1","title":"Some uses, underuses, and misuses of the findings of disparities between people’s valuations of gains and losses","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Economics; Econometrics; Psychology; Actuarial science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.28973642566281477,"score_gpt":0.4267223325905648,"score_spread":0.13698590692775003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580805489","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10543033,0.11111171,0.051856834,0.6529082,0.0070721195,0.00019006299,0.0010690448,0.0005818962,0.06977987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7874275,0.060562596,0.035938505,0.09177744,0.01595307,0.00033823302,0.00038938702,0.001059427,0.0065539335],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9059373,0.065628655,0.007840539,0.005286188,0.014022748,0.0012846286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.42573935,0.43735296,0.030251762,0.061774112,0.041779503,0.0031022874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12244104,0.0011749448,0.0010353709,0.013297479,0.0044997446,0.010081874,0.0030503613,0.003839422,0.0048975954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32994583,0.00083134405,0.0016374789,0.012254745,0.05627556,0.019274464,0.00994903,0.007533289,0.0011699765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061062054,0.00007732608,0.03281512,0.0040293885,0.00080068153,0.00095455523,0.13346179,0.00046136696,0.0026441407,0.34093302,0.059891697,0.4233203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055852357,0.00017388993,0.033889562,0.009084388,0.00035282847,0.0032074782,0.10427046,0.0016213215,0.00387619,0.49512383,0.3479899,0.00035418404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059550307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048275953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12244104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032876485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036499712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6475378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586922569","doi":"","title":"Equivalence: A Novel Basis for Model Analysis","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Equivalence (formal languages); Social psychology; Psychology; Cognition; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.11280445299712455,"score_gpt":0.35401476574929164,"score_spread":0.2412103127521671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586922569","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043163514,0.00024842905,0.98858416,0.0005923143,0.00004326533,0.000048278347,0.00009872159,0.00013069434,0.0059377747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5271893,0.0010304387,0.46428838,0.00070887466,0.00052178995,0.0010435287,0.00075264473,0.00046664325,0.003998223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896006,0.0062211715,0.0005177442,0.0013857125,0.0018167451,0.000457938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809414,0.013427481,0.0012087765,0.0028198028,0.0012054231,0.00039713347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010411296,0.0017586389,0.0028355063,0.0036234427,0.0014248373,0.004206768,0.0035349035,0.0019027303,0.0060255975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04230183,0.0006492745,0.0039592097,0.0022545175,0.005053243,0.006687974,0.006334562,0.0062376875,0.00095636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019529796,0.000039172828,0.0005910635,0.00006747293,0.00009005872,0.00006872141,0.00018923306,0.05092621,0.00022056719,0.93334746,0.00081135443,0.013629089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068576537,0.000020473602,0.00008652009,0.000017846123,0.000012307045,0.000029423898,0.000024710109,0.1327792,0.000058682443,0.8656253,0.0013287788,0.0000099981735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028187863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013866541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010411296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022296433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017597995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055060863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588156857","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000372","title":"Rule-based reasoning is fast and belief-based reasoning can be slow: Challenging current explanations of belief-bias and base-rate neglect.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Belief revision; Dual process theory (moral psychology); Neglect; Cognitive psychology; Analytic reasoning; Psychology; Psychology of reasoning; Dual (grammatical number); Verbal reasoning; Base (topology); False belief; Process (computing); Knowledge base; Reasoning system; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Mathematics; Theory of mind","score_opus":0.15385164640687782,"score_gpt":0.4257448882145097,"score_spread":0.27189324180763186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588156857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88662785,0.013291783,0.047421273,0.019555323,0.000403643,0.0001044881,0.000649511,0.00036623777,0.031579886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98585874,0.0020258168,0.00848766,0.001623965,0.00021006611,0.0000729099,0.00022542522,0.000081435195,0.0014139998],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983563,0.0004287031,0.00018267543,0.0005140526,0.00041213326,0.000106101885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9283726,0.05143243,0.011882482,0.0059348047,0.0013924346,0.0009852346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061903344,0.00029511465,0.00065550295,0.00088048965,0.00043374934,0.0036082526,0.0012693651,0.001498321,0.010323231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08334513,0.00033518265,0.00039243326,0.0011512915,0.0028139385,0.009022982,0.001660106,0.0024674477,0.0008781429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020426298,0.00048746724,0.19984359,0.0023070814,0.00042290887,0.0011604446,0.014320265,0.0026819974,0.0117582735,0.23782186,0.010719997,0.5164334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019551227,0.00043746445,0.29120648,0.00070610654,0.0002779418,0.0026616952,0.005506537,0.02458273,0.0030163322,0.6611432,0.010089548,0.00017643852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021462985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002026847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010323231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009335206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007233377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034534633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591092602","doi":"10.3758/s13423-017-1242-7","title":"Dunning–Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.06192809353097678,"score_gpt":0.41030064360943,"score_spread":0.34837255007845325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591092602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6025386,0.16582228,0.086480826,0.04077428,0.0017312849,0.00044051872,0.000897808,0.00042199873,0.10089242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96324056,0.018389657,0.013796973,0.0019401477,0.0006831935,0.00007362382,0.00015195258,0.000051963616,0.0016717814],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947207,0.001910071,0.0005941762,0.0009823304,0.0016269888,0.00016567494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8059973,0.1655292,0.008950854,0.010298263,0.007694708,0.0015297451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021068284,0.000556438,0.0015031126,0.0030292082,0.00067538826,0.002565141,0.0015495215,0.0017465359,0.0047749323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10896009,0.0005447818,0.0012526012,0.001958531,0.0061244266,0.006479282,0.0015555723,0.0030677216,0.0003823688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014429812,0.00062421255,0.108528614,0.002326546,0.0019878855,0.00084674516,0.002240834,0.005726882,0.005161094,0.24891421,0.00934246,0.6128575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003780892,0.00075536256,0.31056726,0.00070020417,0.001098588,0.0018098945,0.00078014855,0.007881514,0.0042336597,0.65134495,0.020174472,0.00027597396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038940497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003366563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021068284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012792996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001461393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11142111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592762265","doi":"10.1037/xhp0000405","title":"Auditory hindsight bias: Fluency misattribution versus memory reconstruction.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Hindsight bias; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Processing fluency; Fluency; Misattribution of memory; Priming (agriculture); Expectancy theory; Recall; PsycINFO; False memory; Experimental psychology; Response bias; Cognition; Social psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.3307181532794316,"score_gpt":0.49911886581021503,"score_spread":0.16840071253078343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592762265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991892,0.00011652128,0.0069065983,0.000054060143,0.000015369716,0.000029536082,0.00002272333,0.000030358964,0.0009328729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958015,0.000057444453,0.003725139,0.00007399023,0.000012245791,0.000024852121,0.00003304469,0.000009787014,0.00026203637],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820006,0.0006948331,0.00017541189,0.00044878467,0.00041007964,0.000070854425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96936184,0.017520202,0.00827788,0.0035693932,0.000678031,0.00059260696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036682142,0.0003401802,0.00023943698,0.00023962243,0.00012934413,0.00067131204,0.00046160456,0.0005185681,0.0014854239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02641832,0.00021761995,0.00017259047,0.00013391813,0.0008561177,0.00087458605,0.0005477935,0.000521644,0.00021275444],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012705681,0.0018100111,0.124777526,0.0006089413,0.00027675848,0.0005883971,0.0035607992,0.0016691263,0.70751166,0.0038713275,0.0006948672,0.14192495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006731906,0.013195898,0.5967402,0.00012748835,0.0002868893,0.0028503446,0.0012594127,0.0181882,0.34443972,0.018653084,0.0034109165,0.0001745896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026036435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033942005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036682142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002320167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015727931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019399643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593606402","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2017.03.001","title":"The satiating effect of pricing: The influence of price on enjoyment over time","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.0704521657958546,"score_gpt":0.4577020623484072,"score_spread":0.3872498965525526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593606402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99329776,0.00019540741,0.0012107183,0.00016289046,0.0000142961535,0.00001825603,0.000102548125,0.000013975589,0.0049841795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990909,0.000047077454,0.00039053845,0.00004306812,0.00000948941,0.000007839361,0.000049399605,0.0000098736755,0.0003517577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941933,0.00023861247,0.000028624718,0.00009643804,0.00013912343,0.00007793653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98016614,0.013230172,0.002669743,0.0017452006,0.0007213402,0.0014674481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001764826,0.00017218431,0.00040959226,0.00036295995,0.00028196364,0.0014792898,0.0003958494,0.000581141,0.008470505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018797481,0.00023962972,0.00048153955,0.00036781514,0.00089504785,0.00089918205,0.0007991932,0.0013195329,0.00034751356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011618746,0.0038572054,0.6904127,0.0005313416,0.00068046106,0.00049337256,0.0037529853,0.005381797,0.1715837,0.008414329,0.0011995627,0.10207386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039970364,0.00061412214,0.99281,0.000014763079,0.00007589318,0.000058814687,0.00021349153,0.0023525103,0.0020252692,0.0014787131,0.00029111202,0.000025321298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017935596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015167139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008470505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000371695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026821907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028336644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597445068","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbx022.030","title":"M31. An Investigation of Feedback-Guided Decision-Making in Schizophrenia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Iowa gambling task; Psychology; Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming); Context (archaeology); Task (project management); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.09005656534234753,"score_gpt":0.38287103744871165,"score_spread":0.29281447210636413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597445068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99948055,0.00003646585,0.00010967685,0.000015554448,9.913457e-7,0.000010828422,0.00003274681,0.000001849529,0.00031141308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936146,0.00003817742,0.00031470854,0.000010124938,9.1930093e-7,0.000018398647,0.000044514352,0.0000011037356,0.00021058528],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998536,0.00004351397,0.000011798337,0.000021573767,0.000046778103,0.000022698143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995547,0.0000873658,0.00018172823,0.000027165046,0.000045668854,0.00010344022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005808212,0.0002604885,0.00016995991,0.0003909134,0.00023629032,0.00028362474,0.00017029211,0.00021894966,0.0017215271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012034188,0.00010234073,0.00012995869,0.0001957331,0.00039082678,0.00020593278,0.00039756807,0.00037519546,0.00015475348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041653304,0.002082254,0.83222497,0.00039350468,0.00009124142,0.0012439728,0.0040350524,0.0014620376,0.0883256,0.0014595425,0.0003055246,0.064210966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005140048,0.0021679564,0.98945975,0.000024879528,0.000020247275,0.00065655593,0.0006565894,0.0019326287,0.0037466004,0.000874182,0.0003980637,0.000011034593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042126025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003367643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042126025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005425621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087017467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0083761215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597723177","doi":"10.1002/bdm.554","title":"Inventor perseverance after being told to quit: the role of cognitive biases","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Overconfidence effect; Optimism; Pessimism; Procrastination; Sunk costs; Cognitive bias; Psychology; Regret; Population; Optimism bias; Economics; Social psychology; Cognition; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.14771364963490355,"score_gpt":0.4587705466139139,"score_spread":0.3110568969790104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597723177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988612,0.0002122782,0.00009694209,0.0001956378,0.000006001276,0.0000031542422,0.00004650046,0.0000023369983,0.0005759324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994797,0.00012738789,0.0000635666,0.00004298167,0.000012725159,0.0000027911028,0.000062404564,0.000001102753,0.00020727499],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826425,0.0007817879,0.00019409132,0.00018164462,0.00039409354,0.00018413985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8934367,0.06343779,0.033424232,0.0039331773,0.0022508241,0.0035173658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057519507,0.00022486788,0.00042600906,0.0008972329,0.00048454554,0.0016541407,0.00044823394,0.000913892,0.003827926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044529594,0.00023129796,0.00042987117,0.00064372766,0.00059856294,0.0007026065,0.0005766603,0.0013487245,0.00041181807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002289993,0.00014014273,0.98922616,0.000013723103,0.00008437125,0.000087061926,0.0006089927,0.00019274646,0.00017031144,0.00007212513,0.000101485915,0.009073856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009226978,0.000092199545,0.9977035,0.000017468015,0.000043419564,0.00016387389,0.00063118245,0.0005713611,0.00021853446,0.00035559706,0.00018235936,0.0000113724545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030772137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004347372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057519507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044137114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000330803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030419588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601457172","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.03.006","title":"Reaching reveals that best-versus-rest processing contributes to biased decision making","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Psychologica","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Rest (music); Psychology; Probabilistic logic; Contrast (vision); Task (project management); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Computer science; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.4123001231186652,"score_gpt":0.5160188737696465,"score_spread":0.1037187506509813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601457172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9763007,0.00016794766,0.016778952,0.00021193271,0.000030022296,0.000012464199,0.00013420357,0.0002761294,0.006087589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964011,0.000049699767,0.0024093469,0.0000595036,0.000009222449,0.000008410416,0.00008619266,0.000111346046,0.00086502254],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999374,0.000105537896,0.00003025416,0.00019206549,0.0001748386,0.00012327162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955615,0.0022279439,0.0004899123,0.0010673996,0.00023546616,0.0004177881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010625502,0.00041466026,0.00080404995,0.0006701206,0.0005102151,0.0022719556,0.00072452606,0.0011652053,0.0070298635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008933305,0.00044024287,0.0005800981,0.0004415281,0.0007747067,0.0015109363,0.0013435264,0.0013728393,0.00097248564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038925768,0.0007198445,0.047373347,0.0004050703,0.0003108295,0.0005083008,0.0009459796,0.009673329,0.7713524,0.029689291,0.0015927579,0.13353623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020174497,0.0018170275,0.45605832,0.00011727359,0.0005502083,0.0019344056,0.0007136816,0.18061574,0.14810303,0.20732738,0.002331061,0.00023022076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006106764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049477915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070298635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032148804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044755344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023517251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604203227","doi":"10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00068","title":"Testosterone and Cortisol Jointly Predict the Ambiguity Premium in an Ellsberg-Urns Experiment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Simon Fraser University; Università degli Studi di Trento","keywords":"Ambiguity; Testosterone (patch); Economics; Econometrics; Endocrinology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.19263602092197116,"score_gpt":0.43236210533602665,"score_spread":0.2397260844140555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604203227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99955934,0.000020614738,0.00010250484,0.00001723267,0.0000037754023,0.0000060798257,0.000018701945,0.0000024926248,0.00026920647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864405,0.000028458631,0.00038709666,0.00005993077,0.000006408138,0.000021475884,0.00004981592,0.0000030883289,0.00079966936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961495,0.000161659,0.000025734982,0.00008281472,0.000079370766,0.00003543328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829453,0.0006003362,0.00043161635,0.00024093482,0.00005041972,0.0003821055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023832312,0.0003981438,0.0005025798,0.00024325999,0.0003844403,0.0010938024,0.00019380193,0.00048287155,0.0022311436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033597127,0.000288738,0.00020286487,0.00010822816,0.0005500155,0.00037422328,0.00065388315,0.0006551985,0.00027197122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04558007,0.02154691,0.72799957,0.00014093363,0.0006608177,0.0004653019,0.005923009,0.002787429,0.15090221,0.003855953,0.0011723493,0.0389654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004026851,0.0044702333,0.97423244,0.000021381416,0.00016389285,0.00016721399,0.00086030894,0.006769026,0.009246291,0.0024674851,0.0011262704,0.00007264889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016489971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026374187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023832312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023106189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024122704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012603879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604806010","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2010","title":"On the Counterfactual Nature of Gambling Near‐misses: An Experimental Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Medical Research Council; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Wellcome; Shenzhen University; National Natural Science Foundation of China; University of Cambridge; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Luck; Counterfactual conditional; Regret; Near miss; Psychology; Social psychology; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2653274951832202,"score_gpt":0.5239354939175626,"score_spread":0.25860799873434237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604806010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99871826,0.000016617605,0.00057287485,0.00002312005,0.000011467707,0.000082484774,0.000026358764,0.000004149666,0.00054475915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954738,0.000046109904,0.002983034,0.00010069141,0.00003512768,0.00048544482,0.000103572216,0.00001372039,0.0007585586],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968184,0.001338565,0.00030889426,0.00073726894,0.0006445103,0.00015230382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777558,0.014137807,0.0035040881,0.0033854616,0.00048142904,0.0007354661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003647385,0.0005126709,0.0006123617,0.00029275005,0.00057702407,0.0013537414,0.0008576808,0.0009773062,0.0031966753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016925296,0.00052112417,0.00038105354,0.00021807359,0.0016635504,0.00085311243,0.0010536124,0.0018096113,0.000256943],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.09350181,0.1416928,0.13175304,0.00095171673,0.0007889083,0.0015412864,0.014612431,0.006234711,0.53642344,0.013693756,0.0010595318,0.05774665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007441132,0.25900373,0.5797023,0.00015873187,0.0007325611,0.0022963348,0.0029962275,0.039918162,0.08616235,0.015681429,0.0053212396,0.00058577565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046683496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050242315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003647385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035920256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029216005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019289434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605235294","doi":"10.1037/xge0000306","title":"Impact bias or underestimation? Outcome specifications predict the direction of affective forecasting errors.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"PsycINFO; Outcome (game theory); Event (particle physics); Psychology; Specification; Affect (linguistics); Econometrics; Discounting; Economics","score_opus":0.625639811081489,"score_gpt":0.5659165674122808,"score_spread":0.059723243669208226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605235294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89215785,0.0011053795,0.077864856,0.0010737698,0.00026915225,0.00025321386,0.0010893247,0.00041519286,0.025771303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927037,0.00015415125,0.005381955,0.00021036065,0.00006566158,0.00006106788,0.0005352106,0.000067896144,0.0008199268],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99455655,0.0017533129,0.00063133624,0.0010987386,0.0015715081,0.00038850398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9059694,0.05734055,0.01675178,0.013384085,0.0052473,0.0013069529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012739399,0.00087292754,0.00062407256,0.0010410254,0.00036711417,0.0027251875,0.00062460656,0.0011214799,0.003851794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09966244,0.00062602706,0.00091232674,0.000808928,0.0009806406,0.0033465566,0.0022828097,0.0014981932,0.00073389],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020373322,0.0002693415,0.8433065,0.00035988085,0.00069791847,0.00027707042,0.002915573,0.01574799,0.007864952,0.009290731,0.0020439294,0.11518879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011358327,0.00043708162,0.9191442,0.00015716987,0.00032300505,0.0002964307,0.0008204877,0.040637605,0.0055935914,0.029413326,0.0028991576,0.00016444753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039393813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029252614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012739399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079783343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006188116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067373216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608037399","doi":"10.1177/0146167217702613","title":"Motivated Use of Numerical Anchors for Judgments Relevant to the Self","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Anchoring; Psychology; Pessimism; Social psychology; Incentive; Futures contract; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.28544397354384066,"score_gpt":0.46370496511472986,"score_spread":0.1782609915708892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608037399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96193135,0.0002049147,0.016771434,0.00032823207,0.000058776335,0.00010100949,0.00004817494,0.00013037413,0.020425692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895131,0.00008329292,0.009575975,0.00013397202,0.000018110162,0.000044367767,0.000038679063,0.000029094152,0.00056335086],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950682,0.0025445088,0.00028054081,0.0005920642,0.0013865619,0.00012810467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9221626,0.04972648,0.013956796,0.009884409,0.0030170179,0.0012527477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008803046,0.00042960368,0.0003107826,0.00070642546,0.0004118697,0.0017560348,0.0004991195,0.00070809806,0.0035774324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09151688,0.00035439344,0.00029092262,0.0003808714,0.0012597955,0.0022646894,0.0011656148,0.0011669007,0.0004091696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047025234,0.0029773654,0.21968976,0.0018018845,0.00063588313,0.0009289115,0.021719832,0.004375797,0.26804525,0.08171379,0.003415206,0.38999367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074069615,0.004240109,0.6868418,0.0007606506,0.00070637424,0.0013195461,0.0058003804,0.027423108,0.08779966,0.15740784,0.026524704,0.00043516335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034208823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004393464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008803046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034066133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036440312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04655546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612135801","doi":"10.1111/bioe.12356","title":"The Voluntary Nature of Decision‐Making in Addiction: Static Metaphysical Views <i>Versus</i> Epistemologically Dynamic Views","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bioethics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Addiction; Psychology; Philosophy; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.2596064784580862,"score_gpt":0.49851130015426964,"score_spread":0.23890482169618343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612135801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.113124214,0.0155454455,0.2223749,0.26085913,0.0012501522,0.00020307624,0.00014631687,0.0001179876,0.38637885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747308,0.002439289,0.012066958,0.005800534,0.00054720417,0.00019353874,0.000036087364,0.00004354885,0.00414205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98869216,0.0071638813,0.00050512835,0.0010807213,0.001768045,0.00079007784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857756,0.009377092,0.0014792413,0.001565789,0.00094012,0.0008621475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013080798,0.0004642646,0.000703842,0.0017380624,0.0034518156,0.011278707,0.002540466,0.006198539,0.0019929013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01024733,0.0005041314,0.0010804362,0.0010520297,0.07932419,0.012377412,0.0057561705,0.0074246856,0.00035671398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047674966,0.000011079719,0.00011408127,0.00002671151,0.0000031231314,0.0000318632,0.0027883688,0.00012351289,0.000055770728,0.99550265,0.0001485395,0.0011895791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000669029,0.000008714838,0.0002037114,0.000077058074,0.0000032632097,0.000054801,0.0010545515,0.0005286886,0.00005345996,0.9924932,0.0055066114,0.000009233314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022484257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012304444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013080798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056523997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050294925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06917864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613965546","doi":"10.1111/psyp.12883","title":"Brain activities associated with learning of the Monty Hall Dilemma task","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychophysiology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Waseda University; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Counterintuitive; Psychology; Dilemma; Negativity effect; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Prisoner's dilemma; Probabilistic logic; Social psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.08796086872876036,"score_gpt":0.3825776006635094,"score_spread":0.294616731934749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613965546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99684274,0.000054648204,0.0013544271,0.00007260453,0.000017681508,0.000073145166,0.0002051759,0.000020320686,0.0013593191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997647,0.0000479435,0.0012553019,0.00007023407,0.000016775444,0.00012486817,0.00018833487,0.0000072644784,0.00064218976],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998665,0.000028937016,0.000008388096,0.00003619308,0.00003640966,0.000023617973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996686,0.00012971583,0.00007766967,0.000029104163,0.000018170067,0.000076743345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025322277,0.00035621322,0.00030309416,0.00013181918,0.00010711765,0.0002901669,0.0001589692,0.00035777877,0.0015444829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002263215,0.00013651715,0.00009336683,0.00009154942,0.0003636641,0.00024255778,0.00034017532,0.0006196901,0.00013723891],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007297227,0.0025767155,0.04250112,0.00025847228,0.00012574787,0.001146292,0.0013669311,0.0017541902,0.89039963,0.0010443189,0.0019089248,0.049620386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039614292,0.004006895,0.93741196,0.000021685826,0.000043720767,0.0015915078,0.0002771366,0.010948381,0.03897713,0.0048825326,0.0013872643,0.00005567339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003995881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006596397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0015444829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012605017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011454911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005166769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614358634","doi":"10.7202/1039873ar","title":"La décision en ambiguïté : modèles et évaluations expérimentales","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.21867981843231107,"score_gpt":0.4279624490384634,"score_spread":0.20928263060615235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614358634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76563096,0.011731138,0.17655402,0.0040135607,0.0012556212,0.00983052,0.0022182793,0.00033086608,0.028435076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82249475,0.003988518,0.14606935,0.0009906491,0.00034192225,0.019808302,0.0010058235,0.00012617592,0.005174547],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.96430403,0.029935269,0.0014881864,0.001768887,0.0019685526,0.0005350354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63832307,0.34218863,0.007754038,0.006078349,0.0046679913,0.0009879088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041666742,0.0026308845,0.0024830524,0.0010223716,0.0011402853,0.0046035047,0.0025986778,0.004303787,0.01118062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1889556,0.0014970617,0.002144753,0.001393931,0.0033036624,0.0062622274,0.002586664,0.004423279,0.0009382077],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10083342,0.07858397,0.0134247355,0.015357547,0.0045965295,0.0003029972,0.008505985,0.33614552,0.008431843,0.17791589,0.014095123,0.24180648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03669448,0.04030664,0.008765816,0.002852408,0.0040136273,0.00027295641,0.0017724127,0.6148398,0.0084208865,0.2615093,0.01959374,0.00095795473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005344432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004223939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041666742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004158595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027538615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22035748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614504113","doi":"10.7202/1039872ar","title":"Quels déterminants de la prise de risque? Les réponses de l’économie expérimentale","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Gynecology; Political science; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.1444700066093883,"score_gpt":0.42920512677652395,"score_spread":0.28473512016713565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614504113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56882584,0.013484775,0.2828192,0.021630751,0.0022762753,0.0044517564,0.0023671365,0.00025554656,0.1038886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9059052,0.006822858,0.055462737,0.005044042,0.0009066081,0.0076700808,0.0006800216,0.00017750938,0.017330904],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9323058,0.054909457,0.0027059948,0.0036698815,0.005725082,0.0006837061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6137929,0.3530725,0.010099019,0.015691588,0.0066038016,0.00074019784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0720533,0.0013682299,0.0016726555,0.00085752027,0.00090850657,0.0043141698,0.0018536558,0.0029026305,0.029643722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28269702,0.0009634179,0.0024290343,0.0011824089,0.0038760153,0.0039344314,0.0019930492,0.0036360575,0.002775254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024323437,0.014406183,0.06811988,0.019784676,0.008714545,0.00060420815,0.018717844,0.03037594,0.036547936,0.3782063,0.01176358,0.38843542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007384535,0.020399284,0.17623816,0.0055702436,0.005858038,0.0008001199,0.008003939,0.053271096,0.06601494,0.53185874,0.12342709,0.001173728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036530576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020767485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0720533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023797827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024663482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3810588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615603793","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2015.15206abstract","title":"Performance-based Reward: How You Get Paid Shapes How You Value Money","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Reward system; Valuation (finance); Task (project management); Value (mathematics); Psychology; Economics; Computer science; Finance; Neuroscience; Management; Machine learning","score_opus":0.14413686062110284,"score_gpt":0.3465430737658902,"score_spread":0.20240621314478738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615603793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9559546,0.00035061658,0.008381561,0.0007057046,0.000048150854,0.000033257675,0.0000790482,0.000030115689,0.034416936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997291,0.00008043708,0.001434286,0.00009365706,0.000010372998,0.000012366876,0.000029912904,0.000012938751,0.0010350418],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991935,0.00040760144,0.000025013325,0.00012894465,0.00016503569,0.00007984853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949982,0.0024010325,0.0012115039,0.00042475903,0.00038156344,0.0005829297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015562946,0.00038567604,0.00031317963,0.0004079628,0.00039947865,0.0028576439,0.000285714,0.0008732342,0.0055815345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011357564,0.0002115894,0.00030586668,0.00034947973,0.0010076022,0.0016585633,0.00080660114,0.0008413711,0.0005591186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0070601543,0.002717914,0.50620645,0.0008940567,0.0009197425,0.0009233335,0.0072990786,0.012732856,0.13388973,0.12204858,0.004689812,0.20061825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017644638,0.0020116202,0.87882495,0.00010651928,0.0002618152,0.00042044584,0.0018072644,0.017949427,0.008509239,0.084297836,0.0054872753,0.00014728708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008904397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009619133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055815345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006542581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027874918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018672049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618131751","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1706530115","title":"Personal bests as reference points","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Loss aversion; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.25346569360984345,"score_gpt":0.45103619010263934,"score_spread":0.1975704964927959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618131751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39253023,0.00205047,0.09134745,0.0028424256,0.00037395363,0.00014707944,0.00072850834,0.00051135244,0.5094685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97482514,0.00023944597,0.010116855,0.000203398,0.00004821014,0.000057112116,0.0002242663,0.000078638055,0.014206871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973672,0.0011342014,0.00007867619,0.0005055934,0.00065400166,0.00026027465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99305564,0.0021356156,0.001713631,0.0012422987,0.0010024862,0.0008503585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021690002,0.0006419399,0.0003944361,0.0016728226,0.0010845673,0.0042117084,0.00082059024,0.0013103973,0.018911904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01600036,0.00035843527,0.00044057265,0.0015429747,0.0022168043,0.0040104114,0.0030419854,0.001829306,0.0031575102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043699815,0.00046210003,0.055173755,0.00041974193,0.0002071926,0.0004569275,0.005190123,0.010004367,0.0036484455,0.7474494,0.015462759,0.16108821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019038565,0.0009683308,0.1610498,0.00041314337,0.00026965857,0.0006920789,0.0050160675,0.021977028,0.0031466342,0.69485444,0.1111944,0.00022805612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015019537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022677428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018911904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010079142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045820128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063266575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618377127","doi":"10.7202/1039885ar","title":"Confiance, métacognition et perception","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3244306942793855,"score_gpt":0.4631897662369568,"score_spread":0.1387590719575713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618377127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63911486,0.006409239,0.27498826,0.004501484,0.00027121286,0.00016713815,0.00069352787,0.00029508994,0.07355917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711719,0.0015695345,0.023498308,0.00027784723,0.00008964173,0.00010151715,0.00021110849,0.00007026243,0.0030098541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946905,0.0022057164,0.00028338385,0.0011868972,0.0013886539,0.00024480643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9570698,0.030118749,0.005621294,0.004345994,0.0020203984,0.00082370086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066254344,0.0007009846,0.0008512106,0.0014839493,0.0005312597,0.007499652,0.0011042621,0.0013581514,0.007339511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050213818,0.0006841332,0.00089124776,0.0014563868,0.0046107713,0.006132335,0.0019959954,0.0018153352,0.00060576265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018645241,0.00052070344,0.106250934,0.002976601,0.0013637351,0.00031661062,0.007858212,0.027901473,0.018306153,0.45939854,0.0035742417,0.3696683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012975707,0.00052805373,0.1417803,0.0006068498,0.0003473559,0.00053559366,0.0021815572,0.05687099,0.009728594,0.77240473,0.014553476,0.0003327272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030219806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017555744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007499652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015849613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011912636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035039008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621962930","doi":"10.7203/metode.0.6923","title":"The role of the brain in financial decisions: A viewpoint on neuroeconomics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mètode Revista de difusió de la investigació","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroeconomics; Affect (linguistics); Neuropsychology; Financial market; Behavioral economics; Psychology; Finance; Cognition; Economics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.04895700461678462,"score_gpt":0.35363930586053594,"score_spread":0.3046823012437513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621962930","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042443972,0.34329337,0.18466477,0.1927548,0.0037897879,0.000060355604,0.0002706401,0.000101655685,0.23262072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78526664,0.14128986,0.04281039,0.01080543,0.008625765,0.0001634711,0.00008874506,0.00007172579,0.0108778775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993507,0.00034428618,0.000027336358,0.000091416005,0.00013992566,0.000046270772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987809,0.00089764164,0.00007647101,0.00005681044,0.00012185145,0.00006645007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018053486,0.0006578587,0.0007054287,0.0014774759,0.0007408123,0.0036298835,0.00091783144,0.002836318,0.0021239968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023436218,0.00016476102,0.00043328546,0.0010428334,0.008384524,0.0054130065,0.0012827109,0.002542984,0.0005156642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013380228,0.000021142278,0.0002966944,0.00015570327,0.000017583114,0.00007909085,0.0002897159,0.0016464257,0.0005381987,0.98305225,0.0015428774,0.012347074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005457252,0.000023024102,0.0007049516,0.00013374798,0.000008737855,0.000070495895,0.00022586023,0.0019126594,0.00016000011,0.9803137,0.016426465,0.00001490531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011090729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085274014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036298835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014698165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075375783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010664344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622504489","doi":"","title":"Applying Cognitive Architectures to Decision-Making: How Cognitive Theory and the Equivalence Measure Triumphed in the Technion Prediction Tournament","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Tournament; Equivalence (formal languages); Cognition; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Variance (accounting); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Econometrics; Machine learning; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Mathematics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.04117976248640369,"score_gpt":0.3143212163103034,"score_spread":0.2731414538238997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622504489","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37302086,0.00082753703,0.5672194,0.015995154,0.0002711681,0.00007841477,0.00011810044,0.0002158741,0.042253513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9548706,0.00016563492,0.043021124,0.00031261615,0.00007336636,0.000059006532,0.000036725025,0.00003557075,0.0014254262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692684,0.0018890372,0.00010465392,0.00041989592,0.0003847402,0.0002748529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892938,0.0073143532,0.00078856107,0.0012953674,0.00064734806,0.00066053146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060535725,0.00073515833,0.00094196154,0.0012708505,0.0010219285,0.0049402164,0.0020019247,0.0016533723,0.004256587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030030295,0.00052342284,0.0010968951,0.0008807246,0.0069937673,0.009801539,0.0025104077,0.0038106544,0.00036893855],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017280609,0.00015384062,0.0049306736,0.00006203565,0.00010396758,0.00016353276,0.0008980272,0.110670134,0.00049810146,0.8516688,0.0010288247,0.029649261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015937852,0.000022094895,0.00045804726,0.000011266226,0.000008228111,0.000018934521,0.00006680287,0.092182875,0.0001235448,0.90672576,0.0003515522,0.000014929267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031619156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002433943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060535725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021087222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011154409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032014728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623297173","doi":"10.1287/moor.2017.0847","title":"Information and Ambiguity: Toward a Foundation of Nonexpected Utility","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics of Operations Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Class (philosophy); Probabilistic logic; Foundation (evidence); Relation (database); Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer science; Mathematics; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.5213376055904207,"score_gpt":0.5533005944671012,"score_spread":0.031962988876680476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623297173","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05301647,0.0033277052,0.851839,0.011912579,0.00020524471,0.00007985742,0.00017275922,0.000090385955,0.07935606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90265864,0.002064389,0.09114789,0.0007867599,0.00036565564,0.00016276156,0.000089175424,0.000048196078,0.0026766001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99228436,0.0042241914,0.00033714098,0.00089647673,0.0017290912,0.0005288229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97442424,0.019335896,0.0019985696,0.002340465,0.0013426464,0.000558164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008732777,0.00084736507,0.001318649,0.0029018964,0.001337175,0.005688369,0.0024305196,0.0026660173,0.0033058613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028832844,0.0007009442,0.0013729668,0.001964597,0.013063719,0.01352104,0.0044983434,0.005728937,0.0003439983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066507546,0.000009213269,0.00012436503,0.000022097563,0.0000057905336,0.000036337748,0.00013021714,0.002548496,0.000040473293,0.99493176,0.00012054561,0.0020240913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032782373,0.0000064247233,0.00006148246,0.000019728524,0.0000022122679,0.00001674632,0.000038309023,0.0082566235,0.000036791364,0.990873,0.0006803784,0.000005039405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001176668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069180055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008732777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031880066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019132749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046183884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626031197","doi":"10.3758/s13421-017-0723-2","title":"Interactions between inferential strategies and belief bias","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Counterexample; Syllogism; Psychology; Premise; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Statistical inference; Feeling; Statement (logic); Deductive reasoning; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.4022683191648455,"score_gpt":0.4707955966057211,"score_spread":0.06852727744087561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626031197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97653097,0.0006358799,0.010846457,0.0011960906,0.000035431203,0.00003835651,0.00017955531,0.000067742374,0.010469601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964282,0.00015401896,0.0025130536,0.000118201526,0.00002906069,0.000028517446,0.00007133983,0.000040468505,0.0006171175],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952931,0.0028102456,0.0003047229,0.0005557565,0.0007032277,0.00033295256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68804556,0.2907017,0.009220607,0.0071548955,0.0027757664,0.0021014852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010491452,0.0005915626,0.00076960976,0.0010757021,0.00040453736,0.0051420378,0.00092529855,0.002030819,0.009344556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1463203,0.00069536164,0.00064192765,0.001084916,0.0013879812,0.004484021,0.0013391746,0.0023715014,0.00067328097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012771289,0.0045935707,0.6363453,0.0012198583,0.0034614783,0.0014614816,0.007109832,0.019796554,0.03195719,0.12069758,0.0023202882,0.15826568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010880324,0.0014379433,0.45909342,0.00012194823,0.0015614049,0.0010734838,0.0018123602,0.05217348,0.006068204,0.47353947,0.0018114385,0.0002186986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079209177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010491452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005129041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006370498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055484712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2655825240","doi":"10.3758/s13423-017-1333-5","title":"Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; University of Oxford","keywords":"Rationality; Heuristics; Psychology; Ecological rationality; Situational ethics; Perception; Epistemology; Cognition; Great Rationality Debate; Argument (complex analysis); Bounded rationality; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.22239935141937298,"score_gpt":0.5053916825700152,"score_spread":0.28299233115064226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2655825240","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004272863,0.2858141,0.0052834894,0.6812809,0.0039616292,0.000008023427,0.00004565379,0.000022898943,0.019310422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3848647,0.34179953,0.005198835,0.21903001,0.042535283,0.00008885942,0.0001133998,0.00011349403,0.0062558316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98847604,0.0063554104,0.00043196636,0.0013129071,0.0027603575,0.00066329056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9621095,0.031843398,0.0012028329,0.0013641143,0.0028644374,0.0006156786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016568327,0.00048143513,0.0015968028,0.0022428157,0.0030187687,0.0108924955,0.0027781231,0.010034794,0.0042887903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028224451,0.00045610173,0.00074034435,0.0034574957,0.028450752,0.015935333,0.0042747245,0.012378665,0.001052124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006259858,0.000027066113,0.00037852753,0.00059225387,0.00006363914,0.00009648443,0.0030286084,0.0002751783,0.0001230691,0.9088457,0.040706255,0.04580049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020991332,0.00001597372,0.00078838004,0.0011454858,0.000019298252,0.00011126676,0.0028434824,0.00023461618,0.000086298605,0.84588957,0.14881893,0.000025739826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032388237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018139483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016568327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041746288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004020242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08762276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727626161","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2017.05.149","title":"Not State Self-Control, but Time Predicts Unhealthy Food Purchases","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Self-control; Environmental health; State (computer science); Business; Food science; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Chemistry; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07805513205981113,"score_gpt":0.394339339560027,"score_spread":0.31628420750021585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727626161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99835867,0.00013036144,0.00017193802,0.00017578928,0.000024350207,0.0000037646153,0.00022445657,0.000006971004,0.0009035111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990305,0.00004428534,0.00006992423,0.000029072577,0.000014148737,0.0000030017145,0.00017657483,0.0000031115173,0.00062942045],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996517,0.00011566427,0.000027110225,0.000074323936,0.00004005829,0.00009126145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879325,0.006199782,0.0021034835,0.0010397261,0.0003159126,0.0024086654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012890183,0.00027714754,0.00035432976,0.00042647,0.00032712086,0.0012867177,0.00036817507,0.0010165941,0.006047565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006674699,0.00028069015,0.000849786,0.0004410452,0.00045152017,0.00090244313,0.00041711927,0.0013097342,0.00056847726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005225194,0.00035084476,0.99577385,0.000010700257,0.00020501709,0.000033754714,0.00012070414,0.00021059891,0.00032348346,0.00014666269,0.00014486957,0.0021570725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009727053,0.00015531303,0.9974021,0.000008239166,0.000081293074,0.00005378317,0.00013503317,0.0014832771,0.00011753689,0.00040092293,0.00014494159,0.000007833906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039556366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063308026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006047565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001879452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030267832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020231187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2732999591","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0180585","title":"Alternation between different types of evidence attenuates judgments of severity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Cognition; Alternation (linguistics); Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Event-related potential; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Computer science; Communication; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.6949334082849977,"score_gpt":0.45942206338715563,"score_spread":0.2355113448978421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2732999591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99039066,0.0002280266,0.0059406036,0.00022064663,0.000020639138,0.00006722773,0.000048263493,0.000069459806,0.003014355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98895407,0.00011785035,0.010255532,0.00013179834,0.000016261014,0.000058806418,0.00011051554,0.000023050412,0.00033213588],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892504,0.0029619432,0.001713728,0.0017451616,0.0039473027,0.00038144068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91836214,0.05386646,0.01589352,0.0072187656,0.0024967156,0.0021624174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066447593,0.0005739357,0.0008249654,0.0006946152,0.0004896246,0.0025707884,0.0007409772,0.0016358201,0.004264155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064713925,0.0008816297,0.00067666266,0.00046815714,0.0012049174,0.0030169496,0.002398372,0.002611839,0.00024940036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010182323,0.0028955692,0.18964231,0.001626946,0.0009522892,0.000876727,0.0051437626,0.0072950623,0.6409629,0.0074152444,0.0008450637,0.13216187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004885808,0.006221799,0.8725355,0.00022480148,0.00061293156,0.0015272627,0.0016706251,0.025404193,0.060259037,0.02596317,0.0047804476,0.0003115763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005883595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082395395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066447593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006312597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044885144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03514123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734855058","doi":"10.3390/admsci7030023","title":"More Dynamic Than You Think: Hidden Aspects of Decision-Making","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Intrapersonal communication; Multitude; Affect (linguistics); Interpersonal communication; Decision field theory; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Management science; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Decision engineering; Business decision mapping; Computer science; Epistemology; Decision support system; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.17762280033523786,"score_gpt":0.4856936516902002,"score_spread":0.3080708513549623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734855058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38833183,0.008550989,0.2825423,0.08836831,0.0011078443,0.00027527224,0.0003159285,0.00026989097,0.23023763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823498,0.0009975838,0.013470825,0.001215594,0.00008981046,0.00005378793,0.000041562624,0.00003562486,0.0017453687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856936,0.009700638,0.0004202137,0.0013841882,0.0019305298,0.00087087037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96905756,0.022187578,0.002772311,0.0034565758,0.0013825612,0.0011434333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014117198,0.0005581947,0.0006322848,0.001413544,0.0032513507,0.012604838,0.0014626147,0.0020931421,0.0046721776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03751035,0.0005725376,0.0009779559,0.0013471255,0.029725676,0.017866561,0.0057586054,0.004982149,0.0005013327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017516068,0.00012218069,0.0145722525,0.0004144387,0.00012916402,0.00043846187,0.0728383,0.0032170543,0.0012390247,0.8491134,0.0030776185,0.054662857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024459576,0.000075635384,0.0056202486,0.00040431012,0.00005512171,0.00027568557,0.026265956,0.0051975776,0.00074611505,0.93236434,0.028884253,0.00008625179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025568595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027324958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014117198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034759538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039493158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074659765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743103208","doi":"10.1101/174136","title":"The conflict negativity: A neural correlate of value conflict and indecision during financial decision making","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Negativity effect; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Odds; Perception; Cognitive psychology; Logistic regression","score_opus":0.05922746786752679,"score_gpt":0.3283446766854814,"score_spread":0.2691172088179546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743103208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938777,0.00011913957,0.003470823,0.00009477082,0.000014386559,0.000018459024,0.00011505236,0.000012636445,0.002277101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99846673,0.00006188331,0.0011285412,0.000042226115,0.000007613131,0.000017269693,0.000045061446,0.000007248404,0.00022341704],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979025,0.000068961206,0.000012499169,0.000047823276,0.000059771686,0.00002058773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813336,0.0010986032,0.000475987,0.00008325173,0.00010720136,0.000101657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006042317,0.00017195003,0.00015336835,0.00018526355,0.00011173382,0.0004065985,0.00013596463,0.0002582242,0.0021316428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063874945,0.00013482785,0.000082250976,0.0001651758,0.00034653165,0.00032011603,0.00032339856,0.00041479053,0.00010023819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002912273,0.00052030955,0.14533892,0.00042146217,0.0001738214,0.00049825443,0.0020678286,0.0019842219,0.7763959,0.0032300793,0.001046155,0.065410696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050407743,0.00027419592,0.9793966,0.000023442897,0.00003410554,0.0004614182,0.00032679035,0.003126058,0.010371247,0.0054467088,0.00046526405,0.000023829924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033279933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004262672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021316428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011040411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008525751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00713104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744973251","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12341","title":"Wisdom in a complex world: A situated account of wise reasoning and its development","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Situated; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Trait; Motivated reasoning; Empirical evidence; Politics; Situated cognition; State (computer science); Epistemology; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.37989780718522864,"score_gpt":0.5021246441080891,"score_spread":0.12222683692286046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744973251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33184072,0.008130931,0.3047857,0.020283438,0.00019962517,0.00014108839,0.00023527484,0.00023313054,0.3341501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778576,0.00092567905,0.018710397,0.00018972628,0.00003637374,0.000029307032,0.0000429282,0.000020391137,0.0021876195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814117,0.0010336485,0.00009205659,0.00027661564,0.00031079652,0.00014566281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99053055,0.0060767503,0.001176758,0.00092839514,0.00061010465,0.00067746034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034706937,0.00029098752,0.00036305268,0.0017829032,0.001178896,0.006172887,0.0010122629,0.0016130214,0.003794452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010857617,0.00029109462,0.0005605339,0.0014920932,0.01047766,0.007497228,0.0032542509,0.0018770393,0.0003867917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019214614,0.00003549206,0.0034946473,0.00011757431,0.000035613513,0.0003616239,0.0078360485,0.005072511,0.00040543664,0.9641821,0.0007973431,0.017642407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008479396,0.000013768983,0.0025541135,0.00005732078,0.000016655802,0.0001607595,0.0011934015,0.0064944346,0.0001562788,0.9844386,0.004892397,0.000013916827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014321111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001776707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006172887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020167823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001515191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018354952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2745910124","doi":"10.1037/xge0000351","title":"Choice as an engine of analytic thought.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Nanyang Technological University","keywords":"Categorization; Psychology; PsycINFO; Cognition; Perception; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Task (project management); Independence (probability theory); Need for cognition; Variety (cybernetics); Computer science","score_opus":0.22992344395955847,"score_gpt":0.5561097500488356,"score_spread":0.3261863060892771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2745910124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24177255,0.02564152,0.2601272,0.018589359,0.0007801908,0.00025344538,0.0008131069,0.0003788595,0.45164385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9392293,0.0062038363,0.03866656,0.0012850658,0.000191568,0.00015029551,0.000300229,0.000066969005,0.013906148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763596,0.0009745585,0.00015907761,0.00042328332,0.00068501633,0.00012207516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940037,0.0035978868,0.0009002389,0.00068851036,0.0004079404,0.0004017346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030107584,0.00030526394,0.0003015504,0.0009707568,0.00057296635,0.004233016,0.00049545895,0.0009956022,0.01019934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010674922,0.00023709392,0.00059720845,0.00092222623,0.0072657834,0.0066488273,0.0016784846,0.0013119553,0.0011833401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013038809,0.000052991792,0.0052695875,0.00026894239,0.00004815933,0.00012803271,0.0015731241,0.000989096,0.0015389655,0.94374365,0.0024977399,0.04375936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003294599,0.00007922855,0.007603131,0.00013338863,0.000027008884,0.00034366938,0.000593251,0.0030423242,0.00089458964,0.96003443,0.027191158,0.000024909885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001047392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001049458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01019934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012675655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010794655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034120202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748787302","doi":"10.1016/s0065-2601(10)43001-4","title":"The Planning Fallacy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in experimental social psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Generality; Phenomenon; Psychology; Scope (computer science); Epistemology; Empirical research; Prospect theory; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Management science; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.1436415786135078,"score_gpt":0.5189504137256972,"score_spread":0.3753088351121894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748787302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034143387,0.005807293,0.08004439,0.028345322,0.0016669295,0.00003588366,0.00015157589,0.00022619337,0.8803081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4020924,0.008444671,0.05308333,0.014117684,0.0027223045,0.00039493782,0.0004443892,0.0008342479,0.517866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989465,0.00035276604,0.000034959463,0.00026630744,0.00031763103,0.00008180469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978866,0.001409752,0.00007298994,0.00037668154,0.0001714746,0.0000825195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018122637,0.0006359769,0.0005040798,0.00069712894,0.001718208,0.0038147348,0.0009845954,0.0021020293,0.023923578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073160846,0.0004316527,0.00045456653,0.0008163611,0.009280175,0.0070573366,0.0017661133,0.0056611407,0.005112286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063578013,0.0000035722856,0.00002497064,0.000010927367,0.0000015052718,0.000009650267,0.000085454776,0.00019450502,0.000021956484,0.9737583,0.01105632,0.014826531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000224535,0.0000015486689,0.00001983395,0.000016584407,0.000001038734,0.000016388645,0.000019880097,0.00032628895,0.000056090896,0.9728811,0.026657052,0.0000020294106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002658599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025794304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023923578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022399153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002423202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08003235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749582780","doi":"10.1002/acp.3342","title":"A Repeated Forced‐choice Line‐up Procedure Provides Suspect Bias Information with No Cost to Accuracy for Older Children and Adults","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University; University of Regina","funders":"American Psychology-Law Society","keywords":"Suspect; Psychology; Proxy (statistics); Identification (biology); Witness; Selection (genetic algorithm); Eyewitness identification; Task (project management); Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Machine learning; Computer science","score_opus":0.09937085279212711,"score_gpt":0.4285443863926708,"score_spread":0.3291735336005437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749582780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99658704,0.00009839041,0.00226513,0.0000308134,0.000012090523,0.0000728154,0.00015848188,0.00004139897,0.00073379185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878264,0.00009273354,0.010362444,0.000114239374,0.0000141743685,0.00023078769,0.00035120046,0.000024251347,0.0009838555],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976191,0.00067290646,0.00038565818,0.00050936016,0.0006506943,0.00016232255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97253484,0.015687078,0.004425887,0.0052608857,0.001175077,0.00091608916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054510944,0.0003946074,0.00053491845,0.0003542835,0.000244772,0.00056336896,0.0004781637,0.00061664236,0.0034849176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01901801,0.0003285946,0.0003965472,0.00013001669,0.00060056703,0.0009197591,0.00070412207,0.0007888855,0.0005239939],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017045667,0.0061506857,0.34337243,0.000542431,0.00022262684,0.0010567142,0.0037643306,0.0010978767,0.42455748,0.0014065069,0.0020872043,0.19869608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044084367,0.015505457,0.8397434,0.00012730197,0.000114993585,0.0019023707,0.00068687263,0.004205587,0.13113715,0.0011381393,0.0048347437,0.00016306846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011632583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027040679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054510944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003041716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003670905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028828502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750744528","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.071","title":"Neural congruence between intertemporal and interpersonal self-control: Evidence from delay and social discounting","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NeuroImage","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital; McGill University","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse; National Institute of Mental Health; National Institutes of Health; Foundation for the National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Psychology; Discounting; Temporal discounting; Neurocognitive; Intertemporal choice; Ventromedial prefrontal cortex; Interpersonal communication; Prefrontal cortex; Temporoparietal junction; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Self-control; Delay discounting; Anterior cingulate cortex; Neural correlates of consciousness; Cognitive psychology; Impulsivity; Developmental psychology; Neuroscience; Cognition; Social psychology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.16481347699509713,"score_gpt":0.409049675085582,"score_spread":0.24423619809048486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750744528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99727696,0.00019408343,0.0009145816,0.00009260505,0.000010407323,0.0000054710576,0.000081316444,0.0000052067912,0.0014193674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987238,0.00017896217,0.00060537556,0.000036585672,0.000014572274,0.000007611933,0.00011248458,0.000015435826,0.00030508786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996989,0.000058472844,0.000017808872,0.00010292924,0.00008358429,0.00003851106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995631,0.0018794346,0.0013957503,0.00065489043,0.000187802,0.00025117048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013753362,0.00028625087,0.00034602016,0.0005094356,0.00019025199,0.0014854925,0.00044083942,0.00058253284,0.0021845908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009050717,0.00040229477,0.00015740415,0.0005330797,0.0010054882,0.0008918752,0.00065445894,0.0008180229,0.00016519486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015599303,0.001440741,0.49031168,0.00060667703,0.001042504,0.0008173629,0.0034648129,0.0057087885,0.3369505,0.019372042,0.0010858433,0.1235998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020140396,0.00032808117,0.96716934,0.000026486185,0.00015684773,0.00063726294,0.00032935862,0.003102187,0.0071116644,0.020264618,0.00063518184,0.000037536447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017122192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014712702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021845908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027907838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023958998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007308185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751630361","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2017.08.016","title":"Preferred personal equilibrium and simple choices","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Economics; Parametric statistics; Connection (principal bundle); General equilibrium theory; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Statistics","score_opus":0.13365843635847,"score_gpt":0.40148038028014676,"score_spread":0.2678219439216768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751630361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81457376,0.00026233916,0.106150344,0.0017281811,0.00007317684,0.00010948039,0.0003842156,0.00009183196,0.07662655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98616636,0.00009169035,0.007312724,0.00006624975,0.000022713033,0.000038908205,0.000080943464,0.000012385223,0.0062079597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990544,0.00044329694,0.000042591077,0.00015682742,0.00012629252,0.00017661088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99533,0.003056232,0.0004227236,0.00055531855,0.00028034474,0.0003553538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020731408,0.00033819923,0.0007359648,0.0007111375,0.0006855038,0.0022113717,0.0008033728,0.0011503038,0.015075659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012158092,0.00034230162,0.000740609,0.0006604242,0.0011849756,0.0029396776,0.0011113532,0.0011092172,0.0008660169],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050412613,0.00027833876,0.005101377,0.000108755026,0.00012713634,0.00025181883,0.00064141484,0.014906511,0.00077410834,0.9558869,0.0015986167,0.019820878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008749422,0.00006934954,0.002321117,0.000010847429,0.0000248089,0.00013657055,0.00023048445,0.04194662,0.00015699773,0.9543533,0.00064179284,0.000020551968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012900899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013128708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015075659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075955543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005060597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0504331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751778071","doi":"10.1177/1745691617708630","title":"Constraints on Generality (COG): A Proposed Addition to All Empirical Papers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":987,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","keywords":"Generality; Cog; Computer science; Empirical research; Psychology; Programming language; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.3898253117507056,"score_gpt":0.564905420205657,"score_spread":0.17508010845495142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751778071","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021094214,0.021583073,0.21553582,0.5691738,0.018997852,0.0010176549,0.0020121837,0.0009280489,0.14965728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5073286,0.012394667,0.25664294,0.17851432,0.029486954,0.0032458468,0.0017344869,0.0008288872,0.009823258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8581726,0.06641606,0.021023043,0.015659312,0.03512259,0.0036063162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3654745,0.41705146,0.03617688,0.10002113,0.07070284,0.010573284],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16604735,0.0021033739,0.0040431567,0.013351272,0.0099803,0.027858716,0.009065012,0.016195152,0.012258422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44842574,0.0017833121,0.004209841,0.016698735,0.0522146,0.04877207,0.023542084,0.02300584,0.0030631039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002117903,0.00008470429,0.0032753756,0.0010454817,0.0001563004,0.00027415727,0.0025496916,0.0006764991,0.00023438333,0.9163218,0.030911334,0.04425858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009950938,0.00005198931,0.0011980558,0.0009846085,0.00014934737,0.0002883967,0.00056639424,0.00084941887,0.00031054998,0.9331992,0.062216844,0.00008569545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036364654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027878468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83395267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0083673075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019487342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87815285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755120453","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2039","title":"Why Improvement Can Trump Consistent Strong Performance: The Role of Effort Perceptions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Perception; Promotion (chess); Trait; Psychology; Investment (military); Social psychology; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.09829980618987051,"score_gpt":0.4108718380136088,"score_spread":0.3125720318237383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755120453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802263,0.0007240024,0.0038866813,0.001500502,0.000061980114,0.00002805675,0.00005924554,0.00002708576,0.013486082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989857,0.00007411535,0.0005942727,0.0001296559,0.000016543174,0.0000065031545,0.000019410169,0.000006562046,0.00016725216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922651,0.0045959926,0.00042729217,0.0007295123,0.0015130544,0.00046918882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92469484,0.040038824,0.019585133,0.0047814217,0.007944546,0.0029551212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015255404,0.00030283767,0.00042475664,0.0014799316,0.00065721665,0.0038316206,0.0005191965,0.0011071044,0.003247735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09165516,0.0002524995,0.00031541314,0.00083751086,0.0026782968,0.0029522118,0.0018239616,0.0012613096,0.00035426475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030768802,0.00063659874,0.7305839,0.0010359896,0.00065266615,0.0004907743,0.028386218,0.001981054,0.015570964,0.02569693,0.004846897,0.18704121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009241323,0.0009050674,0.9333386,0.0006328704,0.00018831168,0.00022221784,0.019916233,0.004906762,0.004801364,0.029492209,0.0053585544,0.00014540127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001379967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019632548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015255404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007156115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042549663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08067924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756422654","doi":"10.1111/bjdp.12210","title":"‘Things aren't so bad!’: Preschoolers overpredict the emotional intensity of negative outcomes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Developmental Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Neglect; Cognitive psychology; Task (project management)","score_opus":0.10399159574448777,"score_gpt":0.408287172668893,"score_spread":0.30429557692440523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756422654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993642,0.0000669839,0.00011081961,0.0000337382,0.000002170773,0.0000018941188,0.00001871992,0.000005335634,0.00039624062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991634,0.0001102299,0.00035501126,0.000045056433,0.0000027013318,0.0000055792125,0.00005586323,0.000003349177,0.00025866542],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967253,0.00006108089,0.000029939503,0.00006923451,0.00011281209,0.000054439948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646604,0.0011476948,0.0017458609,0.00021925353,0.00019605647,0.00022514974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001181736,0.00030440313,0.00024945624,0.00030238068,0.00017543601,0.0008409879,0.00016180633,0.0003982854,0.0013386173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047625895,0.000259669,0.00019096788,0.00015236129,0.0005616219,0.00046745478,0.0002860416,0.00060965057,0.0002759634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023834326,0.00019730596,0.9652798,0.000059131642,0.000034503224,0.00041512537,0.0032826345,0.00024587673,0.015044212,0.00023112215,0.00044554635,0.014526448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005678311,0.00018326116,0.9948841,0.000017451974,0.000019630636,0.00029582338,0.0011507017,0.00034773228,0.0023892222,0.00027821193,0.0004163166,0.000011890673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047150203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006725951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047150203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032481653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022225693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009375155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760371854","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.012","title":"Reasoning strategies modulate gender differences in emotion processing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Counterexample; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Valence (chemistry); Information processing; Associative property; Cognition; Dual (grammatical number); Context (archaeology); Developmental psychology; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.2954358905163347,"score_gpt":0.42821707162867934,"score_spread":0.13278118111234466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760371854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934416,0.00014164425,0.0007133138,0.00021868397,0.000054496035,0.000012755413,0.00015584732,0.000010632593,0.0052510365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99516535,0.00012314096,0.0008588831,0.00016934497,0.00003127391,0.000017805001,0.00016036579,0.000043544635,0.0034301793],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973696,0.00006072622,0.0000129396585,0.00007857036,0.00005881831,0.000051845676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980484,0.0010180426,0.00046149106,0.00016963454,0.00011707155,0.00018536247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068584847,0.00032180327,0.00026623433,0.00025840572,0.00017505084,0.0015751423,0.00022070145,0.00062275375,0.0104767755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062059606,0.00031951233,0.00015960849,0.00015456339,0.0003481765,0.00061895436,0.00036558948,0.00060677854,0.0008294707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01738441,0.004231194,0.2576753,0.00042311882,0.00042969998,0.0009790289,0.0094214855,0.0016032066,0.59981555,0.010689023,0.0040617757,0.09328629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031419104,0.0007072319,0.9729075,0.00005684223,0.00014376745,0.00031215264,0.00104037,0.0027420423,0.010301504,0.009211152,0.0022184358,0.000044879456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080367306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011521736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0104767755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023758023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021432216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035048306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762465986","doi":"10.1016/j.dcn.2017.09.008","title":"Computational neuroscience across the lifespan: Promises and pitfalls","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"National Institute on Aging; National Institute of Mental Health; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Computational model; Popularity; Computational neuroscience; Psychology; Cognitive science; Reinforcement learning; Latent variable; Selection (genetic algorithm); Developmental cognitive neuroscience; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Neuroscience; Neuroimaging; Machine learning; Computer science; Functional neuroimaging; Social psychology","score_opus":0.5004399576262732,"score_gpt":0.527927025127613,"score_spread":0.02748706750133978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762465986","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004311424,0.96599334,0.0061743897,0.02251548,0.0008241805,0.000008608161,0.00002639131,0.000031677424,0.003994775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0059656845,0.9811427,0.0060595293,0.0035859055,0.0021143996,0.000041536343,0.000036182442,0.000025406158,0.001028712],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989611,0.0004998445,0.000083038845,0.0001468813,0.0002525021,0.0000567714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902366,0.007673351,0.00021750336,0.0003711648,0.0011342461,0.00036707334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00785555,0.0012281225,0.0017139284,0.0022640033,0.0007436345,0.0029848916,0.0025809114,0.002772389,0.003582879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010240572,0.00051504053,0.0008135507,0.0026436222,0.005483046,0.009031803,0.0032733248,0.0070052915,0.0013612994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053540596,0.000052159867,0.0005213681,0.0039125066,0.00011272678,0.000115227034,0.0003007566,0.0024856722,0.00024409343,0.36392698,0.02761669,0.6006583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017484273,0.00005689914,0.0007415642,0.005781014,0.000056893223,0.00037251366,0.0003242204,0.0025123206,0.00025583085,0.45019108,0.53963846,0.000051638905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002946985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003216796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00785555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020863921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044802297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041544616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765347957","doi":"","title":"Do Evaluation Frames Improve the Quality of Conditional Probability Judgment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Conditional probability; Event (particle physics); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Odds; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.141269675882284,"score_gpt":0.38668109792316613,"score_spread":0.24541142204088212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765347957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9567191,0.0009884945,0.023247557,0.0011295287,0.00014546434,0.00019001731,0.00017393088,0.00022194712,0.017183965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882884,0.0002775635,0.010155615,0.00025350825,0.000098390025,0.000077120196,0.0001696341,0.00006488575,0.00061486906],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918263,0.0042128335,0.0005298618,0.0011121593,0.0018287353,0.00049021264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8444981,0.11705801,0.019641131,0.008289098,0.008393956,0.0021197395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012830029,0.0005413236,0.0006975829,0.0008811883,0.0006113794,0.0023944732,0.0007054311,0.0013323716,0.004764997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15924524,0.0005987969,0.00049149414,0.00060592615,0.00095273205,0.0062564374,0.0015346402,0.0010416057,0.00050097605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01539492,0.002249002,0.14226893,0.0015923026,0.0008151834,0.00070785877,0.020466356,0.0114388,0.088478915,0.033605434,0.010130639,0.67285174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024555165,0.0065962295,0.7020975,0.0008534873,0.0015154234,0.0007658699,0.008129456,0.07101327,0.030949308,0.1480895,0.026730854,0.0008035745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043570693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032941597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012830029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012282646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007591614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0678525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767238759","doi":"","title":"The Influence of Individual Differences on the Role of Information Quantity in Statistical Inferences","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Population; Perception; Statistics; Correlation; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Demography","score_opus":0.04788384092498254,"score_gpt":0.3046041332229969,"score_spread":0.25672029229801435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767238759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9830778,0.0007197781,0.0061421087,0.0003611073,0.00007063455,0.00011546317,0.00016910769,0.00004691099,0.009296974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996781,0.0000947434,0.0023646038,0.00014223224,0.000019897305,0.000041103212,0.00007830338,0.00005633031,0.00042184305],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956031,0.001877492,0.00037498504,0.0010142867,0.0009723381,0.00015782716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9176649,0.064010836,0.0054693567,0.008714286,0.0026121275,0.0015284293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007883615,0.00030267978,0.00043014073,0.0005232844,0.00044589356,0.0016830196,0.00039984955,0.0005765252,0.0025068352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048934728,0.00035326442,0.0003095814,0.00039124934,0.0015195255,0.0011672527,0.00097361935,0.0012932005,0.00022821622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018454872,0.002196169,0.3968172,0.0009251672,0.002528086,0.0007427911,0.014669765,0.006765638,0.36589184,0.012715877,0.0026148616,0.17567775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014037752,0.0010464758,0.96434724,0.00005669374,0.00024192387,0.00032395349,0.00051362213,0.0039985846,0.019307125,0.0080822185,0.0018191488,0.00012265566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015986505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016767429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007883615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003558855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002954815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04169303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769277555","doi":"","title":"Clinging to Beliefs: A Constraint-satisfaction Model","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Test (biology); Social psychology; Counterintuitive; Constraint (computer-aided design); Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0840805153695391,"score_gpt":0.32985458232491227,"score_spread":0.24577406695537318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769277555","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44855136,0.00031341834,0.5027839,0.006009694,0.00010183018,0.00016373616,0.0013013806,0.00043290004,0.040341757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96556395,0.00015345885,0.0252487,0.00025542048,0.00003284479,0.0001249748,0.0003073021,0.000045128912,0.008268291],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999178,0.00037329976,0.000036777612,0.00013388775,0.00012908674,0.00014883817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961857,0.0024807192,0.0003649811,0.00027651695,0.00042360014,0.00026851695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001721585,0.0004984544,0.0006851635,0.00059766707,0.0006234142,0.0016835645,0.002045358,0.0021965401,0.008454808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013417817,0.000446178,0.0007196149,0.001178154,0.0017064925,0.00261468,0.0010475103,0.0019879823,0.00063951564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016329883,0.000089449575,0.002342424,0.000037149806,0.000057964156,0.00020817871,0.00019294795,0.83493716,0.00078828575,0.14854647,0.0015963526,0.011040295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032734115,0.000016391043,0.00029117978,0.0000033025588,0.000008225004,0.000017179042,0.00001719632,0.9436409,0.000078684665,0.055507567,0.00037818466,0.000008433894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021181421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015059941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021181421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016916173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014397502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042116284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772399711","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2070","title":"Maximizing Scales Do Not Reliably Predict Maximizing Behavior in Decisions from Experience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Maximization; Stochastic game; Utility maximization; Sampling (signal processing); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Econometrics; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.19936453230406184,"score_gpt":0.45244649938424725,"score_spread":0.2530819670801854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772399711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952553,0.00006125762,0.002754572,0.000016621185,0.000004549174,0.000015869895,0.000037000205,0.000013276447,0.001841561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99867517,0.000016056872,0.001136947,0.000009280198,0.0000023330183,0.000011937759,0.000038410846,0.0000039488527,0.0001057936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985129,0.00070392137,0.00012207565,0.00024635493,0.00034360576,0.00007106004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688938,0.018979182,0.0065512066,0.0031092938,0.0011268426,0.0013396988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033760318,0.0002987102,0.00030716357,0.00047468682,0.00016396063,0.000835419,0.00026816892,0.00036853398,0.0018653142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0334787,0.00015986209,0.00026586172,0.00024655234,0.0006497586,0.0009224789,0.0007361731,0.0005786857,0.00022074375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001044706,0.000587525,0.9193016,0.00014568874,0.00028424105,0.000105041196,0.0011556192,0.0027617156,0.026572803,0.0020524128,0.0002699659,0.045718648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000143912075,0.00047357974,0.9861318,0.000022002458,0.000026424586,0.0001403179,0.00027096222,0.0060963617,0.003798272,0.0026273266,0.0003674831,0.000031016072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027754204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043208065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033760318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015705901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010547664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017854393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2776244342","doi":"10.1037/xge0000377","title":"Hedonic nondurability revisited: A case for two types.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Happiness; Categorization; Preference; Differential (mechanical device); Psychology; Durability; Adaptation (eye); Differential effects; Econometrics; Social psychology; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.2705525379296771,"score_gpt":0.5584231771414976,"score_spread":0.2878706392118205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2776244342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7266089,0.0046102186,0.087559156,0.013365722,0.0008195717,0.00039206276,0.00071144535,0.00014713862,0.16578579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812682,0.0005520393,0.012947157,0.0012730407,0.00018811933,0.00023327918,0.00016072464,0.00008951092,0.0032878786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914597,0.002222758,0.0006875703,0.0022700764,0.002741122,0.00061877526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9454165,0.031285506,0.0069166753,0.01188954,0.0024061936,0.002085561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016201163,0.00067320047,0.0011190765,0.003729319,0.0015394386,0.0057351603,0.0022258318,0.0032163588,0.010666375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08102708,0.0006939552,0.0017085148,0.0040338053,0.011754301,0.01602683,0.006750103,0.0061245486,0.0006397076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001607578,0.0004118719,0.10199841,0.0006795255,0.00021121331,0.001170421,0.025360953,0.0008939732,0.0045645903,0.71244854,0.0020753639,0.14857747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016058999,0.0006818358,0.23010817,0.00050059834,0.0002122624,0.0045977216,0.014536479,0.0065891705,0.0023420812,0.71844965,0.021566024,0.00025546807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012734358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080124673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016201163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017852759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009674684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08568096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782977396","doi":"10.1007/s00199-020-01319-4","title":"Competitive equilibria in a comonotone market","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Complete market; Economics; Uniqueness; Mathematical economics; Competitive equilibrium; Incomplete markets; Microeconomics; Allocative efficiency; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11070953149674458,"score_gpt":0.3720336665161265,"score_spread":0.26132413501938195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782977396","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4153019,0.00058619544,0.5485054,0.0008503182,0.00007784814,0.0001565498,0.0001664396,0.000090647205,0.034264736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97698873,0.00015733796,0.019499572,0.00010764271,0.000023814451,0.00007302868,0.000047008576,0.000010145107,0.0030927362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987895,0.0005341978,0.000052762058,0.00020596219,0.00024160641,0.00017606886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968188,0.0018585542,0.00045890093,0.00021417925,0.00040034106,0.0002492316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017986405,0.0004870287,0.001177506,0.000648107,0.0008402926,0.0018650903,0.0010276546,0.0013861926,0.005521771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060147434,0.00028716412,0.0007197528,0.0005850889,0.0017557767,0.002396529,0.0012313864,0.0008437077,0.00027101632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006146878,0.000099440644,0.00059847545,0.00005647927,0.00004114452,0.00019916418,0.00012396873,0.17426261,0.0010806364,0.8177894,0.000727414,0.004959771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042225198,0.000047173045,0.0002914119,0.000014329782,0.000011716682,0.00005250282,0.000087077184,0.67594707,0.00033915616,0.32184753,0.001300614,0.000019194065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029552279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024215565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005521771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011697955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008820175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018472195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787233800","doi":"10.3758/s13423-018-1460-7","title":"Characterizing belief bias in syllogistic reasoning: A hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis of ROC data","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Max-Planck-Gesellschaft; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Syllogism; Meta-analysis; Cognitive psychology; Bayesian probability; Variance (accounting); Artifact (error); Multilevel model; Social psychology; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6613623943449132,"score_gpt":0.5268100067898177,"score_spread":0.13455238755509547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787233800","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083622135,0.72151345,0.18045607,0.0030646247,0.0011867682,0.0038488195,0.003398992,0.0010328412,0.0018762918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81162935,0.05568398,0.12254606,0.0015669871,0.000510572,0.004726964,0.0025622775,0.00038594982,0.00038791017],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.85246027,0.111833744,0.013102487,0.012144382,0.009730407,0.0007286601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6898696,0.26519284,0.015322061,0.019352468,0.00933917,0.0009238453],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16580142,0.0034639353,0.009623257,0.016310034,0.0010267798,0.004859179,0.004010779,0.0021602458,0.0021707697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28219366,0.0019978124,0.04714523,0.00980171,0.0018859179,0.0041380436,0.002910022,0.0035683059,0.00034679702],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012937919,0.00006283767,0.018127704,0.028741118,0.92489696,0.00013837867,0.00048391154,0.0016561742,0.0006170623,0.0009985347,0.00086253934,0.022121087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077490055,0.0004681105,0.010528034,0.004275177,0.9708958,0.00014214219,0.00016367271,0.0054434375,0.00056825,0.004678345,0.0019641793,0.000097824355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005646137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009249188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8341986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028180035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037218798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8768522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788076187","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-72419-5_4","title":"Financialization and Consumer Behavior","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; Canadian Mennonite University","funders":"","keywords":"Bounded rationality; Financialization; Behavioral economics; Rationality; Debt; Context (archaeology); Heuristics; Consumerism; Consumption (sociology); Homo economicus; Consumer behaviour; Economics; Positive economics; Psychology; Sociology; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Political science; Finance; Social science; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.1834089141211341,"score_gpt":0.3944122876004854,"score_spread":0.2110033734793513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788076187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02077185,0.092476465,0.011479921,0.017238367,0.0010257432,0.00002471599,0.00012033791,0.0000479994,0.8568147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37614465,0.085778646,0.005932866,0.003964353,0.00198165,0.00007181501,0.00024245276,0.000081705075,0.5258019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99990976,0.000029894447,0.0000022981092,0.000014207643,0.000032629232,0.000011183572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998523,0.00009903942,0.000010607371,0.000010107772,0.000017863184,0.000010089629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002745112,0.00043683528,0.00020775075,0.00048138623,0.00032823175,0.0013982654,0.0002467374,0.0009799453,0.018501535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078142935,0.00011321689,0.00014367644,0.00082390604,0.0011720078,0.0017927104,0.00039806502,0.0011356907,0.0018659196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001801261,0.000060371145,0.00039362803,0.00010417499,0.000008164216,0.000048050984,0.000247618,0.000529285,0.0003068834,0.82725525,0.039483357,0.13154535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040590476,0.000011945437,0.0013861456,0.00021201032,0.000004695918,0.00008826222,0.00018343449,0.0010255973,0.00020273581,0.83017796,0.16669402,0.000009045993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013793743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018203121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018501535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095967005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000511225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06189388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789390553","doi":"10.3390/jrfm18100577","title":"External Habit Persistence and Individual Portfolio Choice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persistence (discontinuity); Portfolio; Habit; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Financial economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0580336189928059,"score_gpt":0.33114800135351635,"score_spread":0.27311438236071045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789390553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9404227,0.00015420081,0.044711817,0.00097275263,0.000011852537,0.000029502213,0.00011378896,0.000039372637,0.013544035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981674,0.00004201645,0.00079664617,0.000043752825,0.000006004003,0.000008710899,0.00002656665,0.0000025737875,0.00090637425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999463,0.00023307899,0.000035826168,0.00010096484,0.00007521848,0.00009187905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931677,0.0032146375,0.0019227806,0.0008799526,0.00024008115,0.0005748722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016165976,0.00017599057,0.00036306912,0.00040051583,0.00026519995,0.0011473104,0.00037761306,0.0006742586,0.002839982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009348967,0.000111984264,0.00025040106,0.0004899526,0.0014429415,0.001505742,0.0009480371,0.0007961922,0.00018568514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064907706,0.00045649728,0.30622867,0.000103428894,0.00032380308,0.00092741323,0.0017186836,0.056116853,0.0020630066,0.54759127,0.0015848635,0.08223638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006010704,0.0003072212,0.09152545,0.000032238826,0.000052072504,0.0005911484,0.00069991604,0.12260559,0.00064563524,0.7801133,0.0033192977,0.000047931975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010597758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088577706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002839982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022938116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009500682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789484689","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.010","title":"Alternative outcomes create biased expectations regarding the received outcome: Evidence from event-related potentials","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neuropsychologia","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Negativity effect; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.2839900037486072,"score_gpt":0.4785626881444575,"score_spread":0.1945726843958503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789484689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.973925,0.00073693047,0.016010905,0.0009417385,0.000085839114,0.0000833077,0.00020494523,0.00006798326,0.007943339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99579513,0.00058297557,0.0027976113,0.00023418228,0.000049875696,0.000030544128,0.00012897488,0.000036310885,0.00034438245],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980221,0.00073705794,0.00014502741,0.00030290338,0.0006575346,0.0001353681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96034193,0.032107502,0.00416119,0.002040836,0.00067809975,0.0006704985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058608195,0.00065043144,0.000591438,0.0006759279,0.000252256,0.0026317602,0.0010541416,0.0018693382,0.005746167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05230584,0.0005017192,0.00059168664,0.0005492218,0.0017205143,0.002297902,0.0009856133,0.0018511905,0.00055209437],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024393113,0.0051906924,0.2849267,0.002258168,0.0032911894,0.005400753,0.0030858747,0.04570284,0.17069545,0.12517388,0.0045328587,0.3253486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002322437,0.002228295,0.31952542,0.00021030943,0.00087827636,0.005512252,0.0006371816,0.07551849,0.021943642,0.5688147,0.0022307008,0.00017834267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005488016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002558432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058608195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036254773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045798425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030995369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790092298","doi":"10.1037/pag0000223","title":"Aging and altruism in intertemporal choice.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychology and Aging","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Psychology; PsycINFO; Affect (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Intertemporal choice; Social psychology; Demand characteristics; Economics; Microeconomics; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.15750733033056638,"score_gpt":0.4801107901499552,"score_spread":0.32260345981938887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790092298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9588999,0.0078079607,0.0025153789,0.003334076,0.00007134213,0.000021964413,0.00021251368,0.000008670751,0.027128223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99470973,0.0014914391,0.0010033386,0.00027146467,0.00003253048,0.000014828558,0.000060876155,0.000002900527,0.002412911],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957794,0.00029388524,0.000019843472,0.000042908523,0.00003781893,0.000027637614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941631,0.003904265,0.0011539358,0.00016380458,0.00017434014,0.00044050108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001927251,0.00019437025,0.00018840021,0.00030895334,0.00030952826,0.00082822633,0.00014828022,0.0005317615,0.0066654896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009384878,0.00012639332,0.00021675724,0.00037356908,0.00070663856,0.0008398211,0.00058564625,0.00059289666,0.00034039252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032586462,0.0014345758,0.62689084,0.0008167277,0.00035542055,0.0012750872,0.008773883,0.003984589,0.004322109,0.107739456,0.007825231,0.23332341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001137397,0.00044786258,0.8754508,0.00018590821,0.00016842468,0.0010141071,0.0017116463,0.004454476,0.0004506167,0.10448494,0.011476079,0.000041379004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013271018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026709717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066654896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052900956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036092123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022298336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791058789","doi":"10.1162/jocn_a_01253","title":"Modulating Episodic Memory Alters Risk Preference during Decision-making","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Episodic memory; Psychology; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Preference; Cognition; Social psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.1298668383265355,"score_gpt":0.4015516695397181,"score_spread":0.2716848312131826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791058789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991781,0.000041385458,0.00041609275,0.00003528951,0.000006920426,0.000006470762,0.000014121412,0.000007420386,0.0002941731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99866855,0.000058962636,0.00069507177,0.000027112972,0.0000035562275,0.000015707325,0.000029343133,0.0000057654775,0.00049593434],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996877,0.00009135556,0.00002381085,0.000069522524,0.000060178663,0.00006748212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991578,0.0002485887,0.00023250347,0.00014450298,0.00003471864,0.00018200984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039911282,0.00028240698,0.0003355801,0.00012945826,0.00014475826,0.0007983723,0.00025675417,0.00041331453,0.002220882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019891814,0.00019866475,0.000173389,0.000076343946,0.00044321743,0.000378596,0.00041174344,0.0009059785,0.00018584137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010682011,0.004490005,0.028752202,0.00016994217,0.00015698523,0.000321066,0.0010798568,0.00054690306,0.9145401,0.0008607078,0.00027444612,0.038125698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011407038,0.019266956,0.5102004,0.00008979504,0.00040774493,0.00086611795,0.0014360452,0.009914653,0.44478083,0.009069379,0.002700741,0.00012664929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041651554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051373953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002220882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018859342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023374325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00742954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793054157","doi":"10.1177/1747021818763573","title":"Predicting our own and others’ future preferences: The role of social distance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Presentism; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Phenomenon; Social distance; Preference; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.06693906006831755,"score_gpt":0.42642249283258454,"score_spread":0.359483432764267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793054157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969977,0.00014382473,0.0012395139,0.00013383903,0.000004559968,0.000005038398,0.000014809211,0.000002828604,0.0014579569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999201,0.000069688496,0.0005878509,0.000022127084,0.0000035108965,0.000003702302,0.000021241876,0.0000014903632,0.00008944785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986739,0.000870006,0.000053021005,0.00014957765,0.00019317542,0.00006037354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99019617,0.0067752884,0.0014698122,0.00049473,0.00043547023,0.00062855985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002859294,0.0003055318,0.0002801549,0.00044854963,0.00032664966,0.001346588,0.00022580569,0.000534513,0.0017852411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016250148,0.00017607953,0.00040530536,0.00023292945,0.0005623097,0.0011843442,0.00066381594,0.000695844,0.00017252087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007455252,0.00040154924,0.9176167,0.00009389697,0.00035085945,0.0001710701,0.004922635,0.0036664219,0.0024967857,0.0026740683,0.00031956873,0.06654092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005745805,0.0005788151,0.9529776,0.00007539225,0.00014512944,0.00030464726,0.005092796,0.02490645,0.0014681771,0.012929395,0.0013783937,0.000085837884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027885376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032272218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002859294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030132194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021973203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015121579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793286537","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1031","title":"If You Are Going to Pay Within the Next 24 Hours, Press 1: Automatic Planning Prompt Reduces Credit Card Delinquency","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto; University of Toronto","keywords":"Concreteness; Juvenile delinquency; Psychology; Action (physics); Credit card; Test (biology); Plan (archaeology); Debt; Business; Cognitive psychology; Finance; Payment; Criminology","score_opus":0.24459474517595206,"score_gpt":0.46298260745756364,"score_spread":0.21838786228161158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793286537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866962,0.00012168368,0.0035160917,0.00083551026,0.00021019844,0.0005693787,0.0004155205,0.0013901194,0.006245273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814881,0.00018046971,0.010136433,0.0004518579,0.00011001487,0.000994278,0.0002987544,0.000066399516,0.0062736585],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995179,0.00024225163,0.000043123153,0.00008292206,0.00006713126,0.000046754594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943764,0.003714058,0.0008724026,0.00029056869,0.00016837752,0.00057819334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088766246,0.00049326586,0.00045741317,0.00032035477,0.00029861537,0.00055177615,0.0004890299,0.000721679,0.04173166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010835005,0.0002436035,0.00017336485,0.00016330642,0.00030386497,0.0006425082,0.0004585102,0.00070752465,0.0025831207],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.061290964,0.066592686,0.03231566,0.0035419518,0.00025827932,0.0003824533,0.0033397973,0.002791603,0.047442816,0.002362904,0.03748726,0.7421936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024355771,0.15458487,0.64463735,0.0016402489,0.0021885394,0.0009919883,0.0053384285,0.03209545,0.057797574,0.011504111,0.0644315,0.0004341832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007026721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012865051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04173166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021781174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041817455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1396063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793940238","doi":"10.1111/caje.12314","title":"Welfare economics, risk and uncertainty","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Ambiguity; Utilitarianism; Ex-ante; Economics; Welfare; Expected utility hypothesis; Social Welfare; Social preferences; Microeconomics; Actuarial science; Public economics; Positive economics; Financial economics; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.23786702647772331,"score_gpt":0.26439869263867266,"score_spread":0.026531666160949346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793940238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25765333,0.05624527,0.19629817,0.09985741,0.0007769744,0.0001665633,0.0007470087,0.0000911194,0.38816413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978969,0.0102963345,0.004250845,0.0011586985,0.00030150678,0.00006437075,0.000054406657,0.000010059912,0.0048947395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755895,0.001510107,0.00007212566,0.00017249325,0.0004128178,0.0002734277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99409604,0.0042386046,0.00060148566,0.0003028043,0.0005262304,0.00023470374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033271778,0.0005324858,0.0006952692,0.0009847756,0.0006878577,0.003186004,0.00045616674,0.0018191672,0.0037976294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007451299,0.00020930755,0.00044129396,0.0012408368,0.005436861,0.0026414015,0.0015766842,0.0016479337,0.0001974087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025279112,0.000028162965,0.0013670701,0.00012780745,0.000060951577,0.00008951606,0.00015461413,0.013627732,0.00015748119,0.96959215,0.0018226157,0.012946603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000439169,0.000013415865,0.00064706424,0.00008615621,0.000009438169,0.000036720143,0.00015468163,0.002604413,0.000044030858,0.9925983,0.0037956177,0.000005844715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016577517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012520143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037976294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002833939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012692835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020561695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794622550","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00403","title":"The Role of Type and Source of Uncertainty on the Processing of Climate Models Projections","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ambiguity; Credibility; Timeline; Set (abstract data type); Range (aeronautics); Disjoint sets; Perception; Heuristics; Climate change; Climate model; Feature (linguistics); Econometrics; Computer science; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08966104859247541,"score_gpt":0.40631081347291836,"score_spread":0.31664976488044294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794622550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907178,0.00017153985,0.003399662,0.00018090215,0.000024657618,0.000040106257,0.000035146488,0.000023377981,0.005406716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99685633,0.00009022263,0.0026784604,0.00007292571,0.000017931068,0.00003294633,0.00004157457,0.000025590201,0.00018412457],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99299675,0.003795442,0.00035764842,0.00088435883,0.0015909702,0.00037489203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93764853,0.053240623,0.0042076577,0.0017749417,0.0021968244,0.0009313178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008510559,0.000605121,0.00040663301,0.0009622207,0.0007398454,0.004654085,0.0006799579,0.0018073656,0.002853138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08551868,0.0007592595,0.00074699544,0.00038530066,0.0016189605,0.00460766,0.001931005,0.0014356866,0.00021417876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011996149,0.00090152817,0.31431183,0.0021556364,0.0011695756,0.002228046,0.33823213,0.012361165,0.14477292,0.01205007,0.0023731093,0.15744783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009004503,0.0040218877,0.7555358,0.0014170374,0.0012632164,0.0029122746,0.11940059,0.047379978,0.018680423,0.039986506,0.007551171,0.0009506656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019421662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011902937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008510559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005749541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003516328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04500866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794648354","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2425396","title":"Do Risk Preferences Change? Evidence from Panel Data Before and after the Great East Japan Earthquake","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Panel data; East Asia; Economics; History; Econometrics; China","score_opus":0.18490606764449902,"score_gpt":0.3591590631056432,"score_spread":0.1742529954611442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794648354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972582,0.00032533414,0.00007842003,0.00058167457,0.00002056173,0.0000035769933,0.0008553203,0.0000018204187,0.00087504566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974439,0.0003159216,0.000036687044,0.000121601675,0.000027851747,0.0000039849533,0.0015339485,0.0000025697059,0.0005134951],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936503,0.0001940481,0.00006586577,0.00013326814,0.000068743466,0.00017304749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873131,0.0047985953,0.005179723,0.0010880446,0.0008008141,0.00081976847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015773021,0.00028560017,0.00051908195,0.0006244399,0.00048827165,0.0016372809,0.0005326409,0.0015465955,0.0031479448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069008768,0.00037047896,0.0006550574,0.0016953157,0.0006561142,0.00094204047,0.00076687353,0.0014057979,0.0006967992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011629163,0.00023948237,0.9857307,0.00006281953,0.0006969823,0.0004257899,0.0014022413,0.0012416098,0.0006327429,0.0003758995,0.0017575999,0.006271286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019297391,0.00005004914,0.99708766,0.000011262017,0.00016412248,0.00002420892,0.0012806356,0.00033478544,0.00011072438,0.00018601684,0.0007170463,0.000014176437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036823217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04683806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036823217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042015384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034197723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07321775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795238567","doi":"10.1007/s10899-018-9770-2","title":"Unclaimed Prize Information Biases Perceptions of Winning in Scratch Card Gambling","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Gambling Studies","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Gambling Research Exchange Ontario","keywords":"Psychology; Scratch; Context (archaeology); Equating; Perception; Social psychology; Advertising; Computer science; Developmental psychology; Business","score_opus":0.31440656950015033,"score_gpt":0.4967319749600865,"score_spread":0.18232540545993614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795238567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989241,0.00003038317,0.00023221312,0.000017849323,0.000005432171,0.00000886526,0.00000944298,0.000004348153,0.00076735165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992493,0.000030646686,0.00044786013,0.000039388713,0.000003993346,0.00000890846,0.00001626327,0.0000042207353,0.00019934947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989097,0.0004299365,0.00006920497,0.00017230795,0.0003381137,0.000080820595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99396235,0.0037758837,0.0011989988,0.00047576326,0.00021996186,0.00036711758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017666438,0.00028458005,0.00027674198,0.0002776527,0.00021917942,0.0011035915,0.00022315579,0.000681907,0.002642354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012908856,0.00027864584,0.00018249481,0.00010548076,0.00076901226,0.00067856157,0.00073659315,0.0005636337,0.00016422586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014015365,0.002799176,0.4886033,0.0011352919,0.00041026066,0.00085540855,0.025907231,0.0024180969,0.38726008,0.00254983,0.00095823285,0.073087744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012339644,0.0020254343,0.9784541,0.000095858035,0.00015132668,0.00030116492,0.0036232795,0.002770576,0.009533283,0.0018368947,0.0009870891,0.000097541015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011976355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018056716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002642354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001868146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015178186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009342968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795752317","doi":"10.1027/1614-0001/a000254","title":"Cognitive Reflection Effects on Time Discounting","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Individual Differences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Reflection (computer programming); Preference; Temporal discounting; Cognitive psychology; Stochastic game; Numeracy; Discounting; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Statistics; Impulsivity; Mathematics; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.16221025554991786,"score_gpt":0.43120157013457644,"score_spread":0.2689913145846586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795752317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99626666,0.00011779147,0.0013937283,0.000053142317,0.000010843301,0.000012167918,0.000044109835,0.0000120479235,0.002089582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859923,0.000055393768,0.00088610844,0.000028746763,0.000007641246,0.000010342036,0.00003581279,0.000009436147,0.00036733845],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905604,0.00040110588,0.000056433895,0.00017638832,0.00025518742,0.000054781864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977661,0.012378915,0.0048640114,0.003304444,0.0007751186,0.0010164412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002663402,0.00047691824,0.00037821635,0.00036142737,0.00015607817,0.0011063769,0.00032093775,0.00041366025,0.003098514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021127332,0.00024186958,0.00033129,0.00024522166,0.00058049796,0.0006121571,0.0007399921,0.0014915449,0.00020815761],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01569849,0.0059997463,0.5864557,0.00066005206,0.0015760555,0.00073167577,0.007885871,0.01102971,0.20459627,0.012849362,0.0010140318,0.15150303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016962845,0.0022055034,0.9602444,0.000054256645,0.00031725632,0.00030200405,0.00044116966,0.007952767,0.01676954,0.01051587,0.00094878697,0.00007867089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056070625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003744224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003098514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027957748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015494927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014085591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795986334","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2017.2931","title":"The (Neural) Dynamics of Stochastic Choice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Observable; Preference; Bounded function; Econometrics; Discrete choice; Class (philosophy); Stochastic modelling; Dynamics (music); Stochastic process; Contrast (vision); Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Psychology","score_opus":0.08718519604467406,"score_gpt":0.4031275039371026,"score_spread":0.31594230789242855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795986334","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15332605,0.0019659863,0.780694,0.010444757,0.00021646683,0.00006389326,0.00080827245,0.00017178942,0.05230878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9258654,0.00252709,0.060163245,0.00051333435,0.0001371159,0.00010879021,0.00031548133,0.000037139034,0.010332483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953616,0.00019319679,0.000019186367,0.000119932876,0.00009676421,0.000034748155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809843,0.0012594764,0.00023678452,0.0001515629,0.00015352434,0.000100251695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085652154,0.00020074063,0.00030617128,0.0004794044,0.0002915993,0.0018143143,0.0006047036,0.0008359561,0.0032795584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072363047,0.00026383458,0.0005853455,0.00065044477,0.0016111701,0.002699539,0.00071878254,0.0016278342,0.00046800412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026447753,0.000037497462,0.0028485544,0.00006175392,0.000053077652,0.00007680344,0.00028507898,0.041323174,0.0017094563,0.9229591,0.001378567,0.029240519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081106355,0.00001688808,0.0024246147,0.000020232597,0.000012208911,0.00008244636,0.000054548513,0.108174056,0.00026737447,0.8869304,0.0019915984,0.000017492028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002352504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001704716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032795584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092838134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005514938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010971248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799322610","doi":"10.1177/0301006618773081","title":"Learning in the Target Prevalence Effect","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perception","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Point (geometry); Relation (database); Sampling (signal processing); Value (mathematics); Statistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Computer vision; Data mining","score_opus":0.0853493115442623,"score_gpt":0.41684276196796705,"score_spread":0.33149345042370476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799322610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813736,0.00018373255,0.011552426,0.0003693696,0.000019271714,0.000022392282,0.00003117854,0.000085470805,0.0063624815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962818,0.000064350905,0.0026951667,0.00011293689,0.000013367387,0.000011876667,0.00003197566,0.000025262189,0.00076331233],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867105,0.00038697457,0.00007074927,0.00039281373,0.00037259975,0.00010578571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832132,0.0125554735,0.0013874752,0.0014195968,0.00057129364,0.0008529062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024290725,0.00029200132,0.00066096755,0.00039377372,0.00027509703,0.0012089923,0.0006486208,0.0009644994,0.004679579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022344701,0.00051401724,0.00030711584,0.00018042857,0.0012785492,0.002621947,0.0016289024,0.0017468709,0.00033668484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0065973457,0.0021247237,0.21110836,0.0006119835,0.000385646,0.0011699803,0.002136022,0.011893471,0.43109062,0.04266049,0.0016027233,0.2886186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052607263,0.0029349013,0.7758086,0.00006847608,0.0003106636,0.0020714027,0.00068830454,0.03895163,0.053936522,0.12126484,0.0032790075,0.0001596497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053485343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068441295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004679579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046069396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036431488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015654802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801536555","doi":"10.5539/ijps.v10n2p71","title":"Behavioral Perspectives on Risk Prone Behavior: Why Do People Take Risks?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Psychological Studies","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foraging; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Behavioral economics; Empirical research; Social psychology; Addictive behavior; Addiction; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Ecology; Economics; Neuroscience; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.41586580244852955,"score_gpt":0.5722124755930074,"score_spread":0.1563466731444778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801536555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5578954,0.0774426,0.02033065,0.25929126,0.0011894805,0.000036576992,0.0003075928,0.000036692632,0.083469704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714859,0.016177969,0.0013540991,0.008632102,0.00067743484,0.000018446628,0.000047971833,0.000007049039,0.0015989048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914134,0.0004992377,0.000031064854,0.000119031974,0.00012783828,0.000081453785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751663,0.0014105368,0.0004364479,0.00009192497,0.00030160014,0.00024289552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016517863,0.0004390357,0.00037795573,0.0009906702,0.0007741647,0.0026539215,0.00046203198,0.0021983667,0.0025738776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004104248,0.00014306315,0.0002565381,0.0007086955,0.0057447883,0.0033042028,0.0009325373,0.002320229,0.0003169499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034154713,0.0006005912,0.15246786,0.0009750877,0.00018607664,0.0025046873,0.12922932,0.0010080321,0.003639726,0.5439236,0.0141956415,0.15092772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039499737,0.00033633903,0.12331797,0.0010385172,0.00011565481,0.003503166,0.104338445,0.0018794297,0.0006011158,0.6975501,0.0671371,0.000142617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013048347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010669931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026539215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054499164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000322841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0087355375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802883214","doi":"10.1007/s40070-018-0081-8","title":"On proper scoring rules and cumulative prospect theory","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Cumulative prospect theory; Scoring rule; Weighting; Prospect theory; Rank (graph theory); Property (philosophy); Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Function (biology); Expected utility hypothesis; Belief structure; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Machine learning; Economics; Epistemology; Medicine; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.12894715752955593,"score_gpt":0.4127037657872057,"score_spread":0.28375660825764976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802883214","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025569037,0.0008753254,0.9527388,0.0019651596,0.00024251292,0.00007658982,0.0001248814,0.000135798,0.018271834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6282208,0.002214248,0.35255393,0.0007528019,0.0009291635,0.0003693656,0.00043298886,0.00024037142,0.014286365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865943,0.008164039,0.0011175275,0.0012250778,0.0022452853,0.00065368385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9094906,0.07124482,0.0038206168,0.0075725666,0.0065859114,0.0012854512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02028326,0.001586305,0.0027606008,0.0034824512,0.0019075851,0.0074828467,0.0032551375,0.0035912471,0.0064537935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10434877,0.0014399573,0.0018838106,0.0033097742,0.0069324668,0.015427847,0.0034728798,0.005966199,0.0012775194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031749074,0.00002517155,0.000271811,0.000037370897,0.000021383732,0.00003879867,0.00009802952,0.0082631055,0.00011276094,0.9775843,0.0009683503,0.012547199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058753426,0.000004640497,0.000044768814,0.000010244757,0.0000042387496,0.000014177013,0.000006855464,0.01728203,0.00003378335,0.9822891,0.0002977073,0.0000066623675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019043103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012450218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02028326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015033716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021695986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107269466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802997583","doi":"10.3390/jintelligence6020025","title":"How to Think Rationally about World Problems","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligence","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Variety (cybernetics); Positive economics; Context (archaeology); Sacrifice; Psychology; Social issues; Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Economics; Political science; Law; Economic growth; Computer science; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.18657246087327478,"score_gpt":0.4209051342128343,"score_spread":0.23433267333955954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802997583","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061408593,0.008577051,0.09952281,0.7612629,0.002775806,0.000110825946,0.00021581425,0.00016641371,0.12122744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68399405,0.015164754,0.13968584,0.11235592,0.0049823113,0.000671616,0.00048879883,0.0004217335,0.04223493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99170697,0.004599904,0.0005057755,0.0010479961,0.0014802961,0.0006591748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986161,0.008404118,0.0012119012,0.0012767644,0.0021562176,0.0007900376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014367499,0.0009969102,0.0010324616,0.0016999083,0.0032795693,0.01384251,0.0029944514,0.008745922,0.0062686224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024967251,0.00056331983,0.001508231,0.0010685215,0.03578977,0.023473218,0.0036854257,0.013596207,0.0029866942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013146092,0.000015020784,0.0002252251,0.00008348554,0.000039013787,0.000082306055,0.002162756,0.0009845903,0.0000619749,0.9629605,0.025231678,0.00814028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060954917,0.0000030265771,0.000042766507,0.00005460986,0.0000049994655,0.000032522265,0.000765497,0.00049815874,0.00004900942,0.9761945,0.022340368,0.000008469695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028021566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020922918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014367499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038563418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046475995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075983524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804977554","doi":"10.1007/s40505-018-0147-6","title":"Recursive maxmin preferences and rectangular priors: a simple proof","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory Bulletin","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Prior probability; Mathematical economics; Key (lock); Element (criminal law); Characterization (materials science); Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Bayesian probability","score_opus":0.057114991708866615,"score_gpt":0.3511157200397288,"score_spread":0.29400072833086216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804977554","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013831515,0.0011839637,0.9291675,0.0069647557,0.00026068813,0.00015325706,0.0005405412,0.00037646966,0.047521308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54412144,0.005768493,0.3991404,0.0067894566,0.0021503551,0.0010812196,0.0006784084,0.00067478826,0.03959547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979505,0.00067629,0.00012858395,0.00038014297,0.00048092214,0.00038352035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849882,0.011674372,0.0008025262,0.0011326406,0.0010828975,0.0003193724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005502634,0.0016667942,0.0017499011,0.001397806,0.0014215872,0.003546399,0.0023840636,0.003200067,0.021269592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022741856,0.0022132536,0.0036752129,0.0021894223,0.003831082,0.010829742,0.004371403,0.00847758,0.0025566418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023044262,0.000035470854,0.00020433607,0.00009591974,0.00002847832,0.00011405503,0.00016065389,0.00211093,0.00046721144,0.983836,0.0033963756,0.009527592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016399865,0.0000072686985,0.00016891683,0.000016418051,0.000016212372,0.000108023385,0.000023549863,0.0059090303,0.00020635735,0.99172485,0.0017892077,0.000013736121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031046353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030591455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021269592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017011436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025188292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07115388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809113179","doi":"10.7554/elife.39656","title":"Time preferences are reliable across time-horizons and verbal versus experiential tasks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eLife","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality; National Natural Science Foundation of China; New York University Shanghai","keywords":"Experiential learning; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Delay discounting; Discounting; Time preference; Preference; Time horizon; Task (project management); Temporal discounting; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Impulsivity; Biology","score_opus":0.0802426073853749,"score_gpt":0.38186642720143954,"score_spread":0.3016238198160646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809113179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728252,0.0009288017,0.018860182,0.0005845384,0.00037610513,0.000040257135,0.0005482353,0.00012336636,0.005713378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876079,0.0003946142,0.008387055,0.00021562615,0.00013221754,0.00004388823,0.00045940554,0.000078807614,0.002680498],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980909,0.000460136,0.00017948507,0.00042292423,0.0007052496,0.00014128242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871043,0.006046775,0.003041288,0.0012839173,0.0017750642,0.00074868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030898799,0.000384102,0.00045789173,0.0005187869,0.0002610845,0.0012379504,0.0004123012,0.00046029163,0.004146807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021593476,0.00021764796,0.0002733482,0.00034510496,0.00081784517,0.0007156197,0.00072448945,0.0008108984,0.00065313734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013348972,0.0009276828,0.16531664,0.00090943184,0.0006362459,0.00038418925,0.0035446698,0.0017349009,0.39139125,0.0068963147,0.007213858,0.40769577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021499407,0.0026149063,0.8131366,0.00015321096,0.00042357098,0.0008552049,0.0018394461,0.0066331653,0.14252722,0.016350608,0.014931328,0.00031979766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073691644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010964762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004146807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025438817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002752114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01634103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2851780690","doi":"","title":"Bunk House Rules","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics","score_opus":0.13851498451405977,"score_gpt":0.3808930838355891,"score_spread":0.24237809932152934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2851780690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039256993,0.0002771102,0.010939344,0.0015940462,0.00033190806,0.00005858335,0.00037012686,0.00015626458,0.9823469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21373624,0.0006063714,0.007524198,0.0028654174,0.00031786773,0.00020513799,0.00075584033,0.00045596392,0.773533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971424,0.00046453899,0.00015861723,0.00076263957,0.0009514003,0.00052045204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836105,0.00041971714,0.00006979486,0.0006059221,0.00044243413,0.00010115405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013330646,0.00071443943,0.0010019443,0.0015898887,0.0045900275,0.0072304737,0.0016876174,0.0035480878,0.1303395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006854524,0.0007610516,0.0008119472,0.001403598,0.0030471513,0.0069087674,0.002625215,0.003923245,0.031400435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016919923,0.000013154524,0.000081958926,0.00001484204,0.00000609101,0.000038398175,0.00012597496,0.00012732652,0.00009078042,0.9642547,0.024674471,0.010555528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020427984,0.000011392983,0.00029664926,0.000044523094,0.000011198116,0.000081733364,0.00021670647,0.00067398656,0.000424182,0.7834837,0.21471578,0.00001968664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009519167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013596225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1303395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023740195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018982774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43602908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2856705998","doi":"10.1037/xge0000457","title":"Do smart people have better intuitions?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Task (project management); Dimension (graph theory); Deductive reasoning; PsycINFO; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.16470856980880794,"score_gpt":0.4943128742715425,"score_spread":0.3296043044627346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2856705998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9623851,0.004040811,0.0020687552,0.010580583,0.0002510666,0.000037409904,0.00042750823,0.00013411409,0.020074613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99145085,0.00097308366,0.0012451902,0.003275682,0.00010127596,0.000023657401,0.00021160347,0.000037767913,0.0026808577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990151,0.0002688834,0.000070952054,0.00024041349,0.000231725,0.0001729079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845508,0.00438931,0.005697446,0.0025117474,0.0011027033,0.0017480092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028533428,0.0004246542,0.0006232273,0.0014368684,0.00058325904,0.0034336369,0.0004860941,0.0015485007,0.018640442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024767354,0.00048477371,0.0004793018,0.00068927155,0.0034159475,0.007589044,0.001481661,0.0016823009,0.0024014749],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015959521,0.00085780775,0.6431844,0.0010785254,0.0008616568,0.001589902,0.021612694,0.0009842231,0.0050391736,0.03384155,0.022900984,0.2664531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034297252,0.00079389283,0.7963571,0.00030399303,0.00027966342,0.002442725,0.008231944,0.001671682,0.0014060404,0.15733881,0.030605476,0.00022570278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007556072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006834265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018640442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004449539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003180438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06235844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886966691","doi":"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.06.034","title":"Delay discounting and e-cigarette use: An investigation in current, former, and never cigarette smokers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Drug and Alcohol Dependence","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse; National Cancer Institute; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute","keywords":"Delay discounting; Discounting; Cigarette smoking; Psychology; Environmental health; Medicine; Demography; Clinical psychology; Economics; Impulsivity; Internal medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.13357285850081904,"score_gpt":0.38983672591527363,"score_spread":0.2562638674144546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886966691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996476,0.00008983379,0.000023262422,0.000019029378,0.0000021261558,0.000005355043,0.000024329036,3.92591e-7,0.00018805088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938524,0.00013036688,0.000058410806,0.000019796533,0.0000065322524,0.0000045258334,0.000053258005,0.0000010138662,0.00034083723],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995933,0.00015017451,0.000037013495,0.000060208746,0.000084196174,0.00007504162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954867,0.002428391,0.0007614001,0.00021960655,0.00022567446,0.0008782084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017072441,0.0002593666,0.00051278865,0.00058043073,0.00065119314,0.0013300267,0.00046144595,0.00087831775,0.0024533512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006960054,0.00040743113,0.00074345595,0.00073173415,0.0004873707,0.0010275523,0.0005281387,0.00125282,0.0002744251],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029741486,0.0021554967,0.9894525,0.000017137527,0.000091072405,0.00008189747,0.00083735416,0.000078837584,0.00045552128,0.0001321334,0.000025692514,0.0036982195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052089083,0.0012622406,0.99516845,0.0000074727645,0.00009656214,0.00027862258,0.0013740691,0.0011710409,0.00013903332,0.0002305406,0.00020720645,0.000012672614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010661474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012279745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010661474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005253845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005817991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021198869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887819748","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01461","title":"Cognitive Style and Frame Susceptibility in Decision-Making","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada; York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère de la Défense Nationale","keywords":"Psychology; Framing effect; Cognition; Framing (construction); Cognitive style; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Persuasion","score_opus":0.07506158193669349,"score_gpt":0.4459175960190833,"score_spread":0.37085601408238983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887819748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99675804,0.00006066075,0.0012583347,0.000032416112,0.0000060619136,0.000014863826,0.000011198809,0.0000047652934,0.0018536053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991429,0.000036016674,0.00064787216,0.00001539394,0.000008193862,0.000009077551,0.000018003213,0.000003556841,0.000118871416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747616,0.0013043411,0.00018990425,0.00030106318,0.00055626995,0.00017222992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711593,0.019342054,0.0049275104,0.0021690682,0.0009899985,0.0014121936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005495823,0.00039492277,0.0002481508,0.0010192042,0.00038991915,0.002049804,0.00025669934,0.0006030282,0.002341804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027897703,0.00025531076,0.0004920163,0.0003883831,0.0010824291,0.00089756044,0.0008970739,0.0008609531,0.00021826496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017173938,0.0007260199,0.9055906,0.00015679734,0.000535667,0.00036335454,0.011839783,0.0023093084,0.016825365,0.0026820232,0.0002378037,0.05701583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007295383,0.0005937559,0.9798307,0.000057470996,0.00007847717,0.00035945282,0.002644647,0.0053724316,0.0023427056,0.007961603,0.0006193555,0.00006638836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000703373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007835836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005495823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002645209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023573339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029065013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888193398","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0202732","title":"In the real world, people prefer their last whisky when tasting options in a long sequence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Wine tasting; Sequence (biology); Psychology; Order (exchange); Social psychology; Biology; Economics; Food science; Genetics","score_opus":0.3237415144347216,"score_gpt":0.3862391858001297,"score_spread":0.062497671365408125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888193398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922916,0.00031914076,0.0037014093,0.00009351758,0.00001781556,0.000045011704,0.00018899323,0.000020350102,0.0033220758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930298,0.00025740775,0.005584628,0.0001110898,0.000017300923,0.000040221395,0.0002137256,0.000013909957,0.0007319247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982564,0.0007122886,0.00014846325,0.00042012244,0.00038884298,0.00007383958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877566,0.00559445,0.0037855133,0.0014511943,0.001011942,0.00040026594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039015126,0.00023183049,0.00036941897,0.0006630891,0.00046603265,0.0015081025,0.0002833747,0.00045229582,0.0045607984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0198392,0.00030764067,0.00028618835,0.00064727734,0.0009121756,0.0015853763,0.0005850186,0.0006027943,0.0005333183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037902656,0.0008050389,0.81191236,0.0011327568,0.00076195394,0.00039123607,0.009578587,0.0013485776,0.053461995,0.004483087,0.001439971,0.11089415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038874623,0.00069346663,0.98607856,0.0000738409,0.000081555656,0.00019105183,0.002325887,0.0011019899,0.0032753847,0.0032705215,0.0028110389,0.0000578111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020296094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071960324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045607984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037181692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019435449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0206334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888616395","doi":"10.1111/ecoj.12639","title":"Expectations-Based Reference-Dependence and Choice Under Risk","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom independence; Axiom; Independence (probability theory); Preference; Revealed preference; Mathematical economics; Risk neutral; Prospect theory; Economics; Econometrics; Expected utility hypothesis; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.16569955052686625,"score_gpt":0.4168504478558013,"score_spread":0.25115089732893503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888616395","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39513582,0.0002889488,0.52637756,0.004958104,0.00007490335,0.00008015788,0.00027626063,0.0001390174,0.07266925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98804516,0.00008253157,0.008727699,0.00008831567,0.000018417286,0.000024671861,0.000044841352,0.000011591777,0.0029568677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970797,0.0016618768,0.00009752238,0.00030304882,0.00060880795,0.00024910842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99291766,0.0036438168,0.0011269996,0.0011046097,0.0008380183,0.00036898503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034631025,0.00033268833,0.0005723477,0.00049865805,0.0004470132,0.0025291773,0.0011976572,0.0015300434,0.0047821025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013421953,0.00028167423,0.00079121895,0.00060560455,0.0024462836,0.0034461124,0.0015064211,0.0018230608,0.00062699325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067545756,0.00003942758,0.000810381,0.000021669845,0.000018584104,0.00008600466,0.00020404115,0.017820658,0.00050360884,0.97627604,0.0003230693,0.0038288438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022763381,0.000041565112,0.0005253686,0.000010281976,0.00000815893,0.000050021805,0.00006658132,0.0633576,0.00026142676,0.93484163,0.00079811295,0.000016399195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014257507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007446088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047821025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013748385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006954826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018314838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889788226","doi":"10.1007/s11408-020-00353-5","title":"Behavioral portfolio insurance strategies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Financial markets and portfolio management","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio insurance; Portfolio; Downside risk; Actuarial science; Economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Pension; Investment strategy; Replicating portfolio; Payment; Financial economics; Business; Portfolio optimization; Microeconomics; Finance; Profit (economics)","score_opus":0.08425534236865562,"score_gpt":0.352121121894842,"score_spread":0.2678657795261864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889788226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6343737,0.0007609474,0.14391537,0.004129198,0.00013168993,0.00016869167,0.00019125502,0.0001860609,0.21614303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824603,0.0002344568,0.0051382394,0.00028597016,0.000021374211,0.000046481036,0.000047616893,0.0000059859053,0.01175939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996816,0.0001084849,0.000013632441,0.000042014748,0.000090540496,0.00006380728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915934,0.00030572433,0.00016891945,0.00011924068,0.000108294604,0.00013854723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007813888,0.00043479068,0.000223229,0.0003738783,0.00025833896,0.0014990674,0.00039508485,0.0008791659,0.007542217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039908565,0.000115968316,0.00029734804,0.00025481757,0.00041471425,0.0012338044,0.0006874609,0.00085617957,0.0007995973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012861834,0.0005948023,0.015116153,0.00007845998,0.00012275446,0.00017262882,0.0003778665,0.016629858,0.007623802,0.83294165,0.003277096,0.12293636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007605912,0.0004927496,0.01686167,0.00006673769,0.000110819565,0.00038507392,0.0005584844,0.12628669,0.0032744207,0.84030324,0.011555138,0.000028915958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039653436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005066374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007542217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004505706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053089677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025231242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890724975","doi":"10.3386/w22671","title":"Applying Behavioral Economics to Public Policy in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Employment and Social Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Behavioral economics; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.623303342608137,"score_gpt":0.5932346105687699,"score_spread":0.030068732039367108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890724975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29421115,0.01831825,0.045197215,0.1893279,0.0007649674,0.0007935218,0.0077052615,0.00046985026,0.4432119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9419262,0.00962239,0.014683135,0.0031251514,0.0000865239,0.00013552046,0.0008798919,0.00006618087,0.02947502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962441,0.0011688208,0.000101997415,0.00035194427,0.0009693437,0.0011637872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941401,0.0026880293,0.0003427031,0.00026727008,0.0018224005,0.00073934346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00491958,0.00060367945,0.00084500667,0.0024081557,0.006902096,0.007856346,0.0018939035,0.0018433392,0.0065042484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013932834,0.00049341825,0.000959388,0.006073344,0.0054805013,0.0022854437,0.0024100053,0.0027230266,0.00025506868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006750598,0.00007662492,0.019212123,0.00016979565,0.00007732856,0.0001828548,0.002584184,0.043872535,0.00013766557,0.8704232,0.028517423,0.034678724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014587035,0.00006803284,0.051734973,0.00069279765,0.00020409533,0.00008283351,0.013190795,0.18111385,0.0007300442,0.45748556,0.2942257,0.00032546575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99706453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25638026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25638026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24900678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8624935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893737531","doi":"10.1007/s11238-018-9673-9","title":"Sunk ‘Decision Points’: a theory of the endowment effect and present bias","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Endowment effect; Situational ethics; Sunk costs; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Endowment; Mechanism (biology); Simple (philosophy); Microeconomics; Inference; Prospect theory; Positive economics; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Sociology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0818551225695389,"score_gpt":0.381343428437957,"score_spread":0.29948830586841807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893737531","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1854393,0.0038392057,0.76402354,0.008482197,0.0004926782,0.00008330255,0.00024799537,0.00016295932,0.037228834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513503,0.0011450859,0.04191301,0.0005585937,0.0003589125,0.00007080521,0.000074393116,0.000058164514,0.004470749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997684,0.0011003338,0.0000843501,0.00049809157,0.00044395894,0.00018921484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877808,0.008629728,0.0010129393,0.0014664038,0.0007063441,0.00040375115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005507673,0.0004996296,0.0011052286,0.0012647171,0.00065422914,0.003978342,0.0018591045,0.0020751562,0.00845002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026335044,0.00046086943,0.0011368581,0.0013042092,0.004976472,0.008737294,0.0022172788,0.0030660725,0.0006212258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010960266,0.000039280832,0.0023623228,0.00009333278,0.000084778905,0.000065989996,0.0002868044,0.011502562,0.0005078099,0.95842355,0.0008463612,0.02567751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013952182,0.00002162552,0.0009794428,0.00001760115,0.000014347841,0.00003594328,0.00004151476,0.016914688,0.00016002795,0.9809312,0.0008545586,0.000015122493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083527766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064633845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00845002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013431509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061377685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029127717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893743957","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500006240","title":"How generalizable is good judgment? A multi-task, multi-benchmark study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Psychology; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Quality (philosophy); Axiom; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.23110184384625995,"score_gpt":0.43551786390771624,"score_spread":0.2044160200614563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893743957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996083,0.0001383767,0.0012351797,0.000085755666,0.000031868796,0.00010590745,0.00015540271,0.000021150827,0.0021433134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980426,0.000037496935,0.0007719839,0.00007901876,0.000043339816,0.00012774997,0.00027339207,0.000022608596,0.000601892],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99511033,0.002261685,0.00047474456,0.0010511816,0.0008569755,0.0002450382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89912105,0.06368281,0.011939099,0.016152829,0.0045110853,0.0045932415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012856291,0.00075860316,0.0011288497,0.0016070441,0.0009731775,0.0037969367,0.0012096323,0.0022691868,0.0046729674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.089184314,0.00044106538,0.00076314504,0.00082622573,0.0016554798,0.004999736,0.0020242494,0.002213337,0.0011555523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.027476268,0.02606297,0.72265446,0.0013115733,0.0026922044,0.0010831347,0.020042088,0.01509787,0.0248433,0.010175332,0.00858805,0.13997272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012845825,0.013878475,0.9104054,0.0001805114,0.00044874966,0.00078969053,0.0033664976,0.032681372,0.0036399802,0.0280677,0.0048704813,0.00038675786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015038893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001220654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012856291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061600766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031620922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067991376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899743006","doi":"10.1007/s11166-018-9291-5","title":"Reporting probabilistic expectations with dynamic uncertainty about possible distributions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Econometrics; Probability distribution; Counterfactual thinking; Bayes' theorem; Prior probability; Set (abstract data type); Probabilistic logic; Bayesian probability; Statistics; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Joint probability distribution; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.05329607838990369,"score_gpt":0.3793879351215523,"score_spread":0.3260918567316486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899743006","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2868481,0.0007190083,0.6937061,0.0065984637,0.00031511646,0.00012873411,0.0008236921,0.0006434307,0.010217308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97365,0.0002830961,0.024617089,0.00024063364,0.00017171646,0.000067969115,0.00027256834,0.000038902872,0.0006581017],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989423,0.0053540436,0.0010936533,0.0012993035,0.002256454,0.0005736378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8247897,0.14839621,0.013574238,0.007926003,0.004175491,0.001138335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0139723215,0.00085513724,0.0012040541,0.00113994,0.00046658714,0.0049937717,0.0016658431,0.0029041504,0.003778539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1938216,0.0010785342,0.001035727,0.0016289062,0.0014675641,0.00882216,0.002171338,0.0026752492,0.00051593356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022955225,0.00042857954,0.04067232,0.0005465359,0.0007554,0.0018176283,0.0020683408,0.48898163,0.0035841279,0.28231162,0.00802513,0.1685132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007797272,0.00015036875,0.0034603337,0.00007155056,0.000110527835,0.0004088234,0.00022726796,0.68792456,0.001718529,0.3049216,0.0008469919,0.00008141694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002083966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089565874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0139723215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014070676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011901167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07389361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900034484","doi":"","title":"On Embedded Choice Theory: Re-framing and Emotions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics and Finance","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Embeddedness; Framing effect; Social psychology; Valence (chemistry); Psychology; Strategic Choice; Positive economics; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Economics; Persuasion; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0956444263412624,"score_gpt":0.386857831729927,"score_spread":0.2912134053886646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900034484","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12883039,0.0054173535,0.67726004,0.015128259,0.00044159268,0.00015214607,0.00013697396,0.00006364562,0.17256954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435143,0.0018403432,0.04664115,0.0011561583,0.00033381992,0.0002094116,0.00006741358,0.000047670543,0.0061897323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956144,0.0028941135,0.00013555223,0.00050944585,0.00057836995,0.00026812352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99339277,0.0046223616,0.00067036896,0.0005922703,0.00046264523,0.00025947072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005213897,0.00077621895,0.0007273188,0.0013185027,0.00090004137,0.0030932128,0.0010389319,0.0018946085,0.0047539864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070877313,0.00030447074,0.0011130414,0.0012292414,0.010210702,0.005363441,0.0017088741,0.00345248,0.0004196063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018233572,0.00002296906,0.00035903745,0.000048112237,0.0000130981025,0.000038144943,0.000697653,0.001394875,0.00021756161,0.9927885,0.00016414316,0.0042376886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007415186,0.00001810136,0.00029889485,0.000026553585,0.0000060235325,0.000020637259,0.0001203705,0.0032156908,0.000086924316,0.9945549,0.0016370482,0.0000074114027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000641824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003663019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005213897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002212661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004854815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027574062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900705341","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12590","title":"Revising Audit Plans to Address Fraud Risk: A Case of “Do as I Advise, Not as I Do”?*","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Plan (archaeology); Business; Accounting; Public relations; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.31517912215259025,"score_gpt":0.4900631619620229,"score_spread":0.17488403980943262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900705341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710725,0.00012947155,0.0058175838,0.013366037,0.00008114355,0.00014563237,0.000059646172,0.00013609273,0.009191833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924941,0.000053174244,0.0051316936,0.0013132174,0.000023553346,0.000051955147,0.000025511068,0.000014292613,0.0008924339],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889709,0.0066555827,0.00079724647,0.0010102866,0.0017323003,0.00083374325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93392,0.03847389,0.015174878,0.0072407224,0.002569196,0.0026212607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011953842,0.00037672586,0.000326588,0.00068975124,0.0029340226,0.00253072,0.0009987439,0.003459297,0.003559577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0679331,0.00048704885,0.00046479417,0.0005024605,0.0031202517,0.0028492932,0.0016511235,0.0037574233,0.0004110364],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002905866,0.00492662,0.45554927,0.0005797837,0.00024389909,0.016453285,0.16359073,0.01175167,0.026573129,0.061303824,0.025292238,0.23082975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083850557,0.0028926332,0.46322387,0.0013168831,0.00035211165,0.011746557,0.15944566,0.09125787,0.032064553,0.12528908,0.11074982,0.0008225604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005547028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009847149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011953842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003129766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021820175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06321871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901728273","doi":"10.5334/pb.448","title":"Conflict Detection and Logical Complexity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychologica Belgica","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"GRASP; Psychology; Intuition; Inference; Denial; Modus ponens; Normative; Logical analysis; Non-classical logic; Logical reasoning; Empirical evidence; Logical consequence; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4550523134063947,"score_gpt":0.48360980336610876,"score_spread":0.028557489959714077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901728273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89056486,0.0011068326,0.07622862,0.0016122138,0.00007056235,0.00023510132,0.00021506383,0.00025264558,0.029714055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883907,0.00010960097,0.010793166,0.00012620096,0.00002727341,0.00008000048,0.00012248334,0.000033576893,0.00031706895],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9790101,0.008382469,0.0017443063,0.0030992622,0.006897576,0.00086617726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7083601,0.24180157,0.028551169,0.0118554905,0.0071562054,0.002275552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015162988,0.0006565052,0.0010330953,0.003624598,0.00082323235,0.00483303,0.0014484167,0.0018033278,0.0069980705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24073993,0.00074551266,0.0011594378,0.0016752022,0.004601196,0.008258856,0.0053001824,0.0028463332,0.00035303316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037469594,0.0012540082,0.3260204,0.0021821372,0.0014259838,0.0009105979,0.024862546,0.018888714,0.02818884,0.2446992,0.002935964,0.3448847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000374821,0.0006804007,0.3166872,0.00034255855,0.00035441102,0.001925171,0.00355587,0.060093015,0.0116634825,0.59784806,0.006115185,0.000359824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079065666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036557592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015162988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001473915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092041533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08019054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902702966","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2018.371","title":"Applying Behavioral Economics and Neuroeconomics to Medical Education and Clinical Care","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroeconomics; Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Psychology; Medical economics; Medical education; Neuroscience; Medicine; MEDLINE; Chemistry; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1287138907167547,"score_gpt":0.4207099877046733,"score_spread":0.2919960969879186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902702966","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051126286,0.028815826,0.26451644,0.45563328,0.0029217114,0.0004610535,0.0007315813,0.00017654353,0.19561735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8943894,0.027982764,0.055740815,0.010506313,0.0020940949,0.00056997495,0.00019208562,0.00007131297,0.008453246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98874927,0.00890471,0.00042116418,0.00037554442,0.0010179919,0.0005313038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9492017,0.04400136,0.0019544917,0.00077539607,0.0019120575,0.0021549978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013454262,0.00082673645,0.0010599172,0.0037438925,0.0014108011,0.0072374595,0.00094119227,0.002546282,0.015223466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060722742,0.00056276086,0.0007159567,0.002948797,0.006388784,0.004996113,0.0038954348,0.0042077685,0.0007947247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054647924,0.00029702988,0.011861005,0.00048755773,0.00020354302,0.00021925331,0.00077137357,0.017484596,0.000078038924,0.877484,0.012750536,0.078308254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023791135,0.00003431888,0.003033824,0.0003851133,0.000018864,0.0000372187,0.00087058684,0.009737208,0.000044263852,0.97851413,0.007274792,0.000025901792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019376334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019639192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019376334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010020801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013713443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0727064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903080575","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2018.11.030","title":"Prior knowledge and monotone decision problems","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Monotone polygon; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Econometrics; Economics","score_opus":0.07826004492651611,"score_gpt":0.3583961312109026,"score_spread":0.28013608628438647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903080575","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09540515,0.007410317,0.8483212,0.015616295,0.00033969557,0.000106112864,0.0005219058,0.0001735543,0.032105774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8686582,0.007504887,0.10374728,0.0014841824,0.0013974406,0.00035017237,0.00060917926,0.00012740446,0.016121337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945498,0.0034212777,0.00027112375,0.00067286607,0.00070753205,0.00037737202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.881455,0.109865665,0.0031212713,0.0022154585,0.00205487,0.0012877688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0113350395,0.0013182353,0.0029667516,0.0018334193,0.000846654,0.0047276714,0.0018770815,0.004081337,0.0076359813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06400293,0.001425968,0.0014182106,0.0016436091,0.0048425156,0.008394865,0.0019228242,0.0052450155,0.000625013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010793789,0.000087434535,0.00049481756,0.00018928791,0.00006715547,0.000098630575,0.00008843794,0.037443966,0.00018221635,0.9480229,0.0017601643,0.011457055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022883132,0.00001057427,0.00011365809,0.000019991257,0.000008883427,0.000022850336,0.000007768032,0.056570426,0.00004039508,0.9428252,0.0003481037,0.000009256014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002059657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014235604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0113350395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021502522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017861266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05994618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903695383","doi":"10.2196/12265","title":"The Effects of Positive Affect and Episodic Future Thinking on Temporal Discounting and Healthy Food Demand and Choice Among Overweight and Obese Individuals: Protocol for a Pilot 2×2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Research Protocols","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health; National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Cancer Research UK","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Overweight; Randomized controlled trial; Delay discounting; Psychology; Food choice; Temporal discounting; Gerontology; Obesity; Social psychology; Medicine; Clinical psychology; Impulsivity","score_opus":0.20585762707426264,"score_gpt":0.562214107340927,"score_spread":0.3563564802666644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903695383","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042667263,0.00007374632,0.0009982537,0.00008218645,0.00013237701,0.9935179,0.0004463087,0.000072369825,0.00041010522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017345477,0.000046367797,0.001570818,0.000048829395,0.000018370194,0.99634594,0.00004307482,0.0000025078916,0.00018958056],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.98902345,0.0059265303,0.0011928265,0.00114412,0.0012360729,0.0014770298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876923,0.003980798,0.0019358757,0.0019225783,0.0026245445,0.0018437608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018898806,0.004655013,0.006663826,0.0026014403,0.0039068935,0.0023085636,0.003406892,0.0060058073,0.052829843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019462744,0.0033148495,0.0034610135,0.0024861062,0.0031153949,0.0021424254,0.0019011599,0.0073016887,0.007013695],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.7765534,0.12546149,0.001162004,0.0094012525,0.0010406451,0.000320859,0.0008998632,0.0033410464,0.0042480812,0.003473723,0.013270039,0.06082761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.86403817,0.10369058,0.0029906437,0.0010696357,0.0005797993,0.00004898697,0.00019747645,0.0019422306,0.0014947837,0.0019891465,0.021810304,0.00014820688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025525738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004313586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052829843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003334583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012659972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17673343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908341264","doi":"10.3758/s13421-018-0888-3","title":"Probability matching does not decrease under cognitive load: A preregistered failure to replicate","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Australian Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Max-Planck-Gesellschaft","keywords":"Psychology; Replicate; Cognitive load; Cognition; Task (project management); Matching (statistics); Cognitive psychology; Contrast (vision); Sample (material); Selection (genetic algorithm); Cognitive resource theory; Bayesian probability; Social psychology; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.13954008636621287,"score_gpt":0.3720364253891622,"score_spread":0.23249633902294933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908341264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99234164,0.00014261698,0.0054369397,0.00023632444,0.000055809254,0.0002216796,0.00012900871,0.00008794098,0.0013479391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940753,0.000049307386,0.0039210785,0.00026948107,0.00005223133,0.0004082371,0.00015538602,0.00007603564,0.0009928254],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939177,0.0016830547,0.00052315544,0.0017990922,0.0017718419,0.00030524321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9431468,0.016840592,0.004251428,0.032664683,0.002023049,0.0010734403],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011326541,0.0008736828,0.0014130735,0.0005301388,0.00055149297,0.0009837155,0.0024311405,0.0013089578,0.0054077464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05390649,0.0008353151,0.0011444755,0.00035575422,0.0021422612,0.0021539612,0.0019828735,0.0024592585,0.0011575205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.079644375,0.04205645,0.1423995,0.0017061133,0.0033357248,0.0012674454,0.010507601,0.0042756847,0.43817666,0.008980743,0.0031868054,0.26446298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005488487,0.057569053,0.6459142,0.00015480109,0.0025267887,0.002771963,0.0010374108,0.029986357,0.20367497,0.039011795,0.0114988405,0.0003652886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019367887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011048306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98867345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000489627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007779514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059901178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908473914","doi":"10.1016/j.beproc.2018.12.009","title":"Comparative inspiration: From puzzles with pigeons to novel discoveries with humans in risky choice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Behavioural Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Gambling Research Institute, University of Calgary; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Odds; Psychology; Judgement; Outcome (game theory); Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Logistic regression; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology","score_opus":0.48593856625511117,"score_gpt":0.47889419232334324,"score_spread":0.007044373931767933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908473914","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022310074,0.9984604,0.0001268466,0.00032704265,0.00009306237,0.000001887831,0.0000051414536,0.0000023858615,0.0007600301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028554094,0.99598604,0.00025084207,0.00039983002,0.00016990733,0.000006210514,0.000014706042,0.0000022912338,0.00031469754],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996395,0.00013931436,0.000043480013,0.00008485803,0.000070486974,0.000022267031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895006,0.00082628254,0.00006898603,0.000034122433,0.00007149304,0.000049155664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015930185,0.00074897596,0.0010394522,0.0019903206,0.00028824483,0.0011167198,0.000887821,0.0014135164,0.0022232642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002426241,0.0002909104,0.00054808025,0.0020723518,0.0017052306,0.0022258274,0.0010154403,0.0017201671,0.00064227555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012948607,0.000051088417,0.00038187558,0.017320791,0.00021596691,0.00017786941,0.00038158434,0.00036479975,0.0006473699,0.019055542,0.011543072,0.9497305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052249106,0.00027355747,0.005190657,0.014285393,0.0002554719,0.0014605992,0.00039032346,0.00013719464,0.0005738838,0.028751843,0.9485794,0.000049430782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001460498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026089721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022232642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008451319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096481363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0084248185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910780493","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v11n2p50","title":"Confirmation Bias in Investments","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eurostars","keywords":"Confirmation bias; Investment (military); Disposition effect; Investment decisions; Negative information; Economics; Inside information; Business; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Monetary economics; Financial economics; Actuarial science; Psychology; Social psychology; Behavioral economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1984289546880739,"score_gpt":0.40379717193395537,"score_spread":0.20536821724588147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910780493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9806662,0.00064557145,0.0036391835,0.0005694693,0.000033503165,0.000059002552,0.00010459354,0.00003806484,0.014244386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980082,0.00012167847,0.00092785613,0.0001122963,0.000021334443,0.000015590984,0.000043087595,0.0000050138287,0.0007450072],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932075,0.0026720304,0.0005471345,0.00076452625,0.002416292,0.0003925133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8854444,0.07380219,0.026023624,0.007693188,0.0052049803,0.001831663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008845553,0.00030400025,0.00038661476,0.0011770681,0.0005444299,0.0017992475,0.00042145615,0.0010137912,0.005099968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09300658,0.00028069172,0.0002852385,0.0006144611,0.0011662613,0.0017308498,0.00095449743,0.0010508962,0.00039177484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003472786,0.00077958795,0.735642,0.0008192208,0.0006630685,0.001219697,0.008770331,0.0024855125,0.02996254,0.040102012,0.0026982555,0.17338492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021291296,0.0013615094,0.89862645,0.00028672762,0.00031059101,0.0016137455,0.0028397273,0.0064000627,0.02109552,0.058088634,0.008994673,0.00016937804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011900442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012647285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008845553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006924338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004986566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04678029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911532086","doi":"10.3758/s13423-018-1555-1","title":"A statistical test for the optimality of deliberative time allocation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deliberation; Variety (cybernetics); Incentive; Rationality; Test (biology); Psychology; Task (project management); Consistency (knowledge bases); Dynamic inconsistency; Microeconomics; Economics; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09454468385242114,"score_gpt":0.4226450988256062,"score_spread":0.32810041497318504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911532086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5028133,0.0027090432,0.45895413,0.002522499,0.0010952117,0.001626526,0.0053503974,0.0009911588,0.023937818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.916448,0.00039070554,0.076048866,0.0005611643,0.00036266164,0.0013771747,0.0018607674,0.00018196285,0.0027686378],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9805894,0.00987267,0.0014581651,0.0031015098,0.0043148804,0.00066344824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7984987,0.17747688,0.008665198,0.010567155,0.003404634,0.0013875137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02343668,0.0007238883,0.0017235974,0.0025119032,0.0006978878,0.0014926164,0.0014695129,0.0016565756,0.012394613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.114412606,0.0002960731,0.0025912493,0.00248885,0.0027077894,0.0021197675,0.0014603748,0.0020764384,0.0008466919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01858081,0.0021306663,0.26353288,0.0028060311,0.019826964,0.0010818501,0.00076854386,0.021051425,0.019554866,0.14723827,0.018062014,0.4853657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005279952,0.021908954,0.4411393,0.000550107,0.0053810994,0.002695446,0.0011033046,0.15476254,0.0145620955,0.33031756,0.021974796,0.0003247938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006739955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040673977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02343668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085428497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027504116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12394649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914258438","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1098","title":"Compared to Dematerialized Money, Cash Increases Impatience in Intertemporal Choice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cash; Economics; Intertemporal choice; Patience; Dynamic inconsistency; Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Finance; Social psychology","score_opus":0.14118398296251916,"score_gpt":0.4745694727849915,"score_spread":0.33338548982247235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914258438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.969948,0.00064922735,0.00458908,0.0009457434,0.000038075097,0.00002246589,0.00004011733,0.000015509087,0.023751665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972574,0.00020130054,0.0014262596,0.00012825077,0.000018773324,0.000007758307,0.00001468699,0.0000040084083,0.000941511],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990722,0.00052546227,0.000055967655,0.000109165885,0.00017636124,0.00006075701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886947,0.0074984725,0.0023406907,0.0009085993,0.0002065141,0.00035094275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013632533,0.00029949925,0.00019556335,0.00028518683,0.00032084718,0.0021246872,0.00023677382,0.0005781799,0.0074575157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011691285,0.00018235254,0.0003600935,0.0004196071,0.0012573118,0.0016670125,0.00080739387,0.001121075,0.00026495353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0070728087,0.0034563504,0.3275158,0.0013818647,0.0012856397,0.0012668156,0.0068606334,0.01871428,0.05900911,0.31911388,0.0017636947,0.25255913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024423734,0.003440328,0.71981245,0.00032099124,0.0007529865,0.0012251972,0.0032895468,0.013301505,0.014424382,0.21846001,0.024527036,0.00020132052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004713004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083184405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074575157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057959656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018539288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024947882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916607818","doi":"10.3982/te3647","title":"Gradual pairwise comparison and stochastic choice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Transitive relation; Preference; Preference relation; Similarity (geometry); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Order (exchange); Econometrics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Statistics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.17045502142091484,"score_gpt":0.3911482955049835,"score_spread":0.22069327408406864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916607818","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29114163,0.0009968508,0.6749281,0.001955251,0.0002094091,0.00065205526,0.00054662523,0.00024392261,0.029326145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8530544,0.0003533676,0.14250708,0.00032784845,0.000106120264,0.0006142037,0.00033932625,0.000054083783,0.0026435752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97834283,0.013834896,0.000806338,0.003410558,0.0030498311,0.00055547693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9258042,0.05515348,0.0076118843,0.0077071944,0.0023344434,0.0013888452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021343205,0.00060936797,0.0012222251,0.0015318635,0.0010008038,0.0019267043,0.00190898,0.0012137404,0.008968803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090518005,0.0004966063,0.0018462428,0.0015138679,0.0068602813,0.0057378095,0.0029384326,0.0025325336,0.0005964945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006944592,0.00011838937,0.003823704,0.00026399174,0.00021795911,0.00011683591,0.00059520226,0.0144946035,0.0016398595,0.94324535,0.0007582796,0.03403139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008631198,0.00018073288,0.0026636312,0.00002576017,0.000027000107,0.00011545601,0.000067072935,0.032857787,0.00062442163,0.9613256,0.0019897157,0.000036627353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010561172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011184467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021343205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017736237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014538247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112874985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917640324","doi":"10.5167/uzh-95109","title":"How Time Preferences Differ: Evidence from 45 Countries","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Innsbruck; Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt; Fudan University; Peking University; LOEWE Zentrum AdRIA; University of Windsor","keywords":"Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory; Hyperbolic discounting; Time preference; Inflation (cosmology); Individualism; Discounting; Scale (ratio); Economics; World Values Survey; Econometrics; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.07483483675299946,"score_gpt":0.2987708226638049,"score_spread":0.22393598591080544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917640324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99330586,0.0023444362,0.0003540398,0.0001159015,0.00001309261,0.00001273782,0.0010531271,0.0000021472063,0.002798536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99715424,0.0012578717,0.00017069557,0.000069466936,0.000006808419,0.000012689631,0.0011313328,0.000004376579,0.00019258205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965528,0.0015505615,0.00048308828,0.000603823,0.0003836255,0.00042615648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799079,0.008819582,0.007319375,0.0018276653,0.0013894383,0.00073619734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039314036,0.00029234926,0.00054810557,0.0019528414,0.00042673087,0.0019815152,0.00031353542,0.00047783973,0.0019811164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009638817,0.0003108973,0.00071750174,0.005739728,0.0009170265,0.00093659817,0.0016381914,0.0005941089,0.0003118621],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004918925,0.000092246766,0.9600733,0.00034397512,0.0009135088,0.00030278965,0.007487718,0.00083912426,0.00035812295,0.0018764962,0.0010374191,0.02618335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029388832,0.000120623314,0.98750615,0.00018972042,0.00027718462,0.00024245602,0.0052917073,0.00015595769,0.00033564074,0.00037356262,0.0054431474,0.000034475543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01010636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006812734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01010636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031794014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028711482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020791471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919328485","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33017949","title":"Rethinking the Discount Factor in Reinforcement Learning: A Decision Theoretic Approach","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Reinforcement learning; Axiom; Markov decision process; Bellman equation; Generalization; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Preference; Computer science; Revealed preference; Decision theory; Markov process; Mathematics; Econometrics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics; Statistics","score_opus":0.24995316240911114,"score_gpt":0.3937038071337248,"score_spread":0.14375064472461369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919328485","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008403671,0.0010720111,0.9872093,0.0011531132,0.00011995815,0.000027780872,0.000025357545,0.000055435215,0.0019333344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7577699,0.0020871595,0.23612632,0.0005846406,0.0005686282,0.00015960285,0.000049962342,0.00016606819,0.0024878096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510926,0.0027514414,0.00025381305,0.00087997346,0.0007334095,0.0002719653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97389394,0.022391783,0.0011284372,0.0010149551,0.0009094693,0.0006613805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011156974,0.001956027,0.0031865493,0.001069675,0.0007921926,0.0034984332,0.004348249,0.0037724806,0.002464084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0376957,0.0015847794,0.001613217,0.0012110567,0.0056046364,0.009714984,0.0030604065,0.009833383,0.00027978013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014812831,0.00012445303,0.0008345025,0.00021065368,0.00013407494,0.00010359886,0.00020437886,0.47295943,0.0009981132,0.4969577,0.0008132386,0.02651171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031553576,0.000038222708,0.00007470744,0.000032959775,0.000028139828,0.00001708524,0.000012631226,0.71988314,0.0002044234,0.27909863,0.0005517537,0.000026777714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034686741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002256025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011156974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003053649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00201869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059004426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2925235104","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x18001875","title":"How uncertainty begets hope: A model of adaptive and maladaptive seeking behavior","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Hoarding (animal behavior); Psychology; Incentive; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Feeding behavior; Economics; Microeconomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.2372149180738014,"score_gpt":0.3829963734115134,"score_spread":0.14578145533771197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2925235104","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007297757,0.0013299775,0.001005729,0.98832405,0.0051581813,0.0000042211473,0.000029097568,0.000024265972,0.0033946706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056490947,0.004930467,0.0019530552,0.8813246,0.042776383,0.00008956576,0.00005184538,0.00004598629,0.012337057],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999006,0.00048292297,0.00005833098,0.00013780456,0.00018507394,0.00012990186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947291,0.003958349,0.00020899794,0.00026232397,0.00043450046,0.00040685406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023260321,0.00059715065,0.00078679575,0.0003812265,0.0015762352,0.0025674112,0.0016233502,0.019847082,0.0049196826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012558265,0.0003340508,0.00083339115,0.00036409753,0.0048354478,0.0038667012,0.00119447,0.024426809,0.0037814046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032938056,0.00007408176,0.001080191,0.00009714657,0.00005574749,0.0035411818,0.00022555394,0.0009310132,0.00038171557,0.15615995,0.78828365,0.04884047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028996886,0.00007733638,0.0009158143,0.00014830293,0.000028025092,0.0029862304,0.00023184116,0.00827715,0.00024696148,0.7144553,0.27225095,0.000092155766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030980352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038539004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019847082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032587857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013641359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023644209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2927601509","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500006604","title":"Why choose wisely if you have already paid? Sunk costs elicit stochastic dominance violations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Sunk costs; Stochastic dominance; Economics; Irrational number; Dominance (genetics); Status quo; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Prospect theory; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08666690225901935,"score_gpt":0.38749835216467315,"score_spread":0.3008314499056538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2927601509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845256,0.00008470498,0.0051621767,0.0006127451,0.000031068226,0.000017289038,0.000038267524,0.000016803198,0.009511389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99848455,0.00003626901,0.00088180625,0.00010462988,0.000008054045,0.0000065350596,0.000022164018,0.0000066573525,0.00044927342],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979699,0.00089795527,0.00012570758,0.000225416,0.00058877066,0.00019220453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98285335,0.010527454,0.0029594507,0.0016310005,0.0009904763,0.0010382627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028768417,0.00020010256,0.0004547902,0.00037338657,0.0004526057,0.0014399622,0.0002860806,0.0008839349,0.005242956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024339788,0.00019586753,0.00022304877,0.00036007632,0.00084498775,0.0009550024,0.00061689224,0.0011900977,0.00044265858],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007969632,0.0026779375,0.51268166,0.0010025892,0.0007292844,0.0029648142,0.00576247,0.013675462,0.09811311,0.15034607,0.00892341,0.19515356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003652518,0.0018690507,0.56505185,0.00015697152,0.00030531906,0.0020562185,0.0050515234,0.08024216,0.018083371,0.31708485,0.009486338,0.00024712924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006163503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011994055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005242956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005279623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003238759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017539382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2932161991","doi":"10.1101/598466","title":"Behavioural and neural interactions between objective and subjective performance in a Matching Pennies game","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Optimism; Contingency; Psychology; Matching (statistics); Negativity effect; Social psychology; Contrast (vision); Competition (biology); Trustworthiness; Contingency table; Ultimatum game; Statistics; Cognitive psychology; Econometrics; Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06622057945594605,"score_gpt":0.31716383471988235,"score_spread":0.2509432552639363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2932161991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992543,0.00000579546,0.00043077135,0.0000056244426,0.0000013337034,0.000006997155,0.000019880341,0.0000039690444,0.00027129843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999086,0.0000072680223,0.00058193994,0.000009018206,0.0000012035562,0.000015816579,0.00003094799,0.0000039963434,0.00026386546],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996357,0.00011315909,0.000017711005,0.00008224488,0.000113250324,0.000037904054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989791,0.00042316274,0.00029435725,0.00006883051,0.00006045261,0.0001740664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058944355,0.00020698634,0.00023880455,0.00015922937,0.000077657984,0.00060588104,0.00015269464,0.0002696601,0.0011381502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044753985,0.00017882069,0.00006774104,0.000121483834,0.00031637083,0.00027307472,0.00034365855,0.0003637038,0.000084474865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006429897,0.0015772951,0.17941034,0.0002083541,0.0003106752,0.00022266986,0.0018165874,0.006175758,0.76693887,0.0013579826,0.00040007246,0.035151463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005064139,0.001294901,0.9708162,0.000008495687,0.000026647127,0.000068735084,0.00017460644,0.014744755,0.011602493,0.0010124358,0.00017403091,0.000026054631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008935955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013690706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0011381502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018147692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008693311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003807485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936326179","doi":"10.3819/ccbr.2019.140006","title":"The Case for a Heuristic Approach to Account for Suboptimal Choice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Margin (machine learning); Space (punctuation); Heuristic; Line (geometry); Psychology; White (mutation); Selection (genetic algorithm); Font; Arithmetic; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Machine learning; Biology; Geometry","score_opus":0.4844919538919981,"score_gpt":0.509163919179003,"score_spread":0.024671965287004938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936326179","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025079563,0.0015673916,0.81819445,0.040418115,0.0009265429,0.00033723025,0.001173349,0.0008347349,0.1114686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7923531,0.0011459937,0.18098882,0.0063384213,0.00082166,0.0006453267,0.0007540483,0.0004916283,0.016461002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99293035,0.004252396,0.0002971789,0.0011559143,0.00084093754,0.0005231224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684884,0.019008417,0.0029690464,0.0065237745,0.001806127,0.001204149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012116179,0.0015720078,0.0025123237,0.0017940097,0.0017248754,0.006821887,0.005034377,0.0057047224,0.04503396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075894274,0.0009619124,0.0018271401,0.001980167,0.004215466,0.010174565,0.0034092113,0.0056274785,0.0038541497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019273568,0.000121174104,0.002826995,0.0002644632,0.00032040145,0.00024190637,0.00036033342,0.04746436,0.00012706981,0.9070505,0.014753282,0.026276726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003525151,0.000017758006,0.00030970885,0.000037164507,0.00001939324,0.00006252076,0.000085723725,0.06655053,0.000035383808,0.9292614,0.0035594867,0.000025777768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065261154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009033964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04503396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038135827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055123186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1506536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936701616","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v8n3p46","title":"An Essential Analogy Between Coherent Previsions of Random Gains and Well-Behaved Preferences","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Mathematics; Analogy; Mathematical economics; Decision maker; Regular polygon; Expected utility hypothesis; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.08372914305427011,"score_gpt":0.4154550330500134,"score_spread":0.3317258899957433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936701616","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045744915,0.00062817405,0.93373585,0.0016639107,0.000095259515,0.00006139622,0.00015019333,0.000059999147,0.017860353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7996921,0.0007383376,0.19529422,0.00057525374,0.00028739162,0.00027146554,0.00013044899,0.00006589074,0.0029448862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942986,0.0025096035,0.00031206573,0.0009131111,0.0016274798,0.00033907575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927401,0.003867684,0.0010471698,0.0011934843,0.0007879893,0.0003636256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006027754,0.0007430369,0.0009010204,0.0016442391,0.0006717805,0.0045020366,0.0012723773,0.001290421,0.0029946435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012350203,0.0005114321,0.0014161526,0.0015515294,0.005792481,0.008693231,0.002502564,0.0034230277,0.00033796346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007766063,0.000010881652,0.00012811447,0.00002409926,0.000019305884,0.000038128186,0.00010736846,0.002129948,0.00042097512,0.9948179,0.00013101472,0.0021644535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006979774,0.00002810047,0.00016317081,0.000012257784,0.00000822897,0.00004850661,0.000031864696,0.009188886,0.0002045249,0.9893547,0.000941405,0.0000114330105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037301335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026292301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006027754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011735992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006935651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031878233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937891012","doi":"10.3819/ccbr.2019.140001","title":"What Suboptimal Choice Tells Us About the Control of Behavior","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Margin (machine learning); White (mutation); Psychology; Line (geometry); Animal behavior; Space (punctuation); Mathematics; Arithmetic; Social psychology; Computer science; Biology; Zoology; Geometry; Machine learning","score_opus":0.3171822628679781,"score_gpt":0.47071811886844933,"score_spread":0.1535358560004712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937891012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51173896,0.011946933,0.13731474,0.11982231,0.0012988807,0.0001056271,0.00393105,0.00033201513,0.21350947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901044,0.0017493869,0.002970746,0.0016849808,0.00022790048,0.00003412388,0.00022802419,0.000049927636,0.0029504553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697685,0.001628859,0.00011145629,0.0006343534,0.00033482342,0.00031365085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97125727,0.020932019,0.0025457493,0.0027817113,0.0015435952,0.00093966955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064292355,0.00039976626,0.0011068891,0.0010062908,0.0007745163,0.0045021377,0.0008427021,0.0024081236,0.013888044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038160916,0.00043623187,0.0008349956,0.000713693,0.00583928,0.00614455,0.00078850257,0.0023753876,0.0013911698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083949446,0.00019724433,0.028411176,0.0005118747,0.0006385928,0.0002799939,0.001019517,0.017954275,0.0007597462,0.8822054,0.01458007,0.05260264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038536633,0.000046743036,0.0077644056,0.00006687859,0.00005047403,0.00006919144,0.00022458601,0.012244411,0.000244631,0.9767801,0.002434235,0.000035952304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031355598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020208606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013888044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001943063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010496896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046460092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939024220","doi":"","title":"Street-level bureaucracy: best to be grey (or silver) on Friday, in Halifax","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Favourite; Bureaucracy; Certificate; Demographic economics; Variation (astronomy); Advertising; Test (biology); Psychology; Demography; Economics; Business; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.3015787825574317,"score_gpt":0.46488405563472557,"score_spread":0.16330527307729387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939024220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97174406,0.00052194204,0.00013901321,0.005131471,0.00007818845,0.000021419834,0.0005972427,0.000028280923,0.021738399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633191,0.00024716035,0.00017415924,0.000929944,0.000018418537,0.000015964288,0.00026900173,0.00002076474,0.035005476],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995197,0.00014731634,0.0000073988926,0.00006971665,0.000062664636,0.00019320041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985378,0.00018048998,0.00024926793,0.000039792027,0.00020355795,0.0007891391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058387057,0.00014823159,0.00016050495,0.00030139118,0.004260702,0.0015027205,0.0005713195,0.0007029273,0.01258124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014008638,0.00013952561,0.00008034319,0.00042416304,0.0017469907,0.00055469346,0.000884418,0.00063460885,0.0021281575],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010792994,0.0003083529,0.5584496,0.00029951046,0.00006077309,0.0050746184,0.14916946,0.000767231,0.0049394043,0.0057198647,0.18730189,0.086830035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011375428,0.00011790558,0.7642163,0.00008639436,0.000006737539,0.00026200415,0.16114147,0.00022597394,0.000346972,0.00030538224,0.07324317,0.000036347046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45015347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7410468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54984653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005563558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020508948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89506656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939624893","doi":"10.3758/s13421-019-00927-3","title":"The development of fast and slow inferential responding: Evidence for a parallel development of rule-based and belief-based intuitions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Dual process theory (moral psychology); False belief; Dual (grammatical number); Affect (linguistics); Developmental psychology; Theory of mind; Communication; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.2050320571790161,"score_gpt":0.40853867670353927,"score_spread":0.20350661952452317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939624893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93717015,0.0010738575,0.044671085,0.0014851916,0.00011587723,0.00022021112,0.00052077183,0.0003609735,0.014381928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760743,0.00062384736,0.020133,0.00063471426,0.000042250365,0.00015309389,0.0003530172,0.00020576747,0.0017799693],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951338,0.0012986982,0.0004137534,0.0011374351,0.0017794371,0.00023682244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7822082,0.15878455,0.015911667,0.030346759,0.009795746,0.0029530711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014593615,0.00051340513,0.00073808,0.0016653173,0.00032065331,0.0029500816,0.0012638958,0.0015925613,0.0055963695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10682107,0.0011361414,0.00062450033,0.0007534167,0.0029239752,0.0035032886,0.0017448158,0.004633618,0.00077759824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005206861,0.002926069,0.2808835,0.0017138561,0.00092206505,0.001312575,0.011517111,0.008807939,0.11767204,0.109095015,0.004452418,0.45549065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005668151,0.001449438,0.7738506,0.0002840671,0.00039366324,0.0031103024,0.0009821353,0.020714527,0.037587784,0.15111005,0.009598953,0.00035180457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012410478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053167413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014593615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005291021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011668535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07717931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943275446","doi":"","title":"\"Never tell me the odds\" do people emphasize value or probability when choosing between alternatives?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport (SCAPPS refereed abstracts repository)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Psychology; Odds; Task (project management); Outcome (game theory); Statistics; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Economics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.06454443448268607,"score_gpt":0.33651497540864067,"score_spread":0.27197054092595463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943275446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9647249,0.0037196148,0.00615644,0.012308061,0.00034952362,0.000030184874,0.00015639506,0.00003782264,0.012517144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99299663,0.0012773201,0.0014531942,0.0029064452,0.000117398464,0.000025438616,0.000056745663,0.000013146831,0.0011536583],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860686,0.0007622715,0.00006766467,0.0001851813,0.00028310684,0.00009501874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926041,0.003990179,0.0017610961,0.00043412705,0.00076455093,0.00044610666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037165883,0.00028587994,0.00042115973,0.00046142374,0.00061299175,0.0020427192,0.00037787668,0.0016162036,0.003914143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030971374,0.00035825235,0.0002909656,0.00027488338,0.0019020431,0.003851666,0.00063764775,0.0015432907,0.0006595166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00355031,0.0005699849,0.53743047,0.0011452067,0.00073893473,0.00114329,0.0980705,0.0005388065,0.013176216,0.020812264,0.020287778,0.3025363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048907317,0.0014738825,0.6732089,0.0012633665,0.0006922526,0.004999634,0.13178518,0.007062795,0.003810857,0.11203811,0.06270723,0.00046871885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016034798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022828563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003914143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031877117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028922787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019655406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945104486","doi":"10.1257/aeri.20190051","title":"The Relation between Behavior under Risk and over Time","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review Insights","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Economics; Relation (database); Consumption (sociology); Certainty; Mathematical economics; Decision maker; Econometrics; Expected utility hypothesis; Microeconomics; Subjective expected utility; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09454115975625091,"score_gpt":0.37655474229856084,"score_spread":0.2820135825423099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945104486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7964837,0.0032243251,0.15986471,0.004296113,0.00013876514,0.000101421036,0.00054104556,0.00012873785,0.035221156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99097973,0.0007015222,0.006720969,0.00016915797,0.00006126168,0.000025621124,0.00008303508,0.000014779266,0.0012438241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974847,0.0010211524,0.0001855145,0.00066185335,0.00045946203,0.00018726893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9435941,0.03707504,0.0126596475,0.0036364044,0.0019571374,0.0010776434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005037167,0.00021170806,0.0003885016,0.00088166876,0.0003099653,0.0021320598,0.0005103759,0.0009724781,0.003848049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05139538,0.00019883874,0.00043214942,0.000964401,0.0024151478,0.002907372,0.0009992108,0.0015602383,0.00028064143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000700991,0.0002559788,0.19398642,0.00040209352,0.0004944762,0.00043078762,0.0024015435,0.02565648,0.004868063,0.6022328,0.0010179501,0.16755235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052735948,0.00047053365,0.2297065,0.00010613417,0.00022796371,0.00082839397,0.0009001672,0.034658797,0.0016499265,0.7254889,0.005793983,0.00011600941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016850284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010434109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005037167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096712506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042316812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026639462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945826097","doi":"10.1093/jeea/jvad062","title":"Hard-to-Interpret Signals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of the European Economic Association","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Observable; Epistemology; Computer science; Data science; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16321926697632816,"score_gpt":0.38430541070633034,"score_spread":0.22108614373000218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945826097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5164019,0.0007117318,0.37742388,0.006694173,0.00053697824,0.0002608529,0.00090907735,0.0012322717,0.09582921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761095,0.00018159293,0.019707846,0.00040910425,0.00007732448,0.000051701543,0.00016623762,0.00009913881,0.0031975142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962036,0.0018264035,0.00018779338,0.0006433212,0.00091357017,0.00022531509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96615213,0.024303686,0.0029723821,0.003826343,0.0020662008,0.00067923137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029372035,0.0009691742,0.00062907476,0.0007104144,0.00049158034,0.003910603,0.00094205746,0.0017932362,0.018634232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037566613,0.00043050232,0.00037840172,0.0006375174,0.0021336044,0.0039194264,0.0015160526,0.0024585966,0.0016811426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002218357,0.00080315495,0.015958095,0.0014875799,0.00029475256,0.0009906424,0.0022552495,0.08539857,0.11451752,0.6548425,0.012238665,0.10899491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016285057,0.00030404536,0.0057436926,0.00015052657,0.000069787995,0.00030649695,0.00052758533,0.21405096,0.021465424,0.75035936,0.006770199,0.00008906454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069095916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033194348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018634232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085080235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062404637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062337697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946737764","doi":"10.31820/pt.28.1.3","title":"Fluency and Feeling of Rightness","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psihologijske teme","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fluency; Psychology; Feeling; Processing fluency; Cognitive psychology; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Mathematics education; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12121488560684562,"score_gpt":0.40803474124502936,"score_spread":0.28681985563818374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946737764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99128526,0.00042166613,0.0018016774,0.00019499961,0.000033938435,0.00001659192,0.000062615996,0.000035145764,0.0061481125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99856454,0.00009282034,0.0006620397,0.00011716773,0.00001657795,0.00001031459,0.000044629607,0.000008835789,0.00048319664],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984567,0.00054958963,0.00013004927,0.00025718196,0.00045727845,0.00014916452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833277,0.007070131,0.0054715183,0.0015836522,0.0012597544,0.0012872167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020647065,0.0002847152,0.0002594272,0.00067765196,0.00029199017,0.0016333502,0.00023204125,0.00078461546,0.0031182128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021403132,0.00019918274,0.000342528,0.00021613193,0.0012576447,0.0012768741,0.001023527,0.0010618905,0.00020263655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003582118,0.0010487658,0.5807353,0.0009832681,0.0012060658,0.0014728109,0.072352976,0.0020562566,0.12875822,0.010005843,0.004291398,0.19350697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008126929,0.0013026097,0.97400755,0.00012812074,0.00014123098,0.0011138252,0.006869546,0.00140259,0.003296318,0.008119608,0.0033605464,0.00017666117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005251424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053513976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031182128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026928858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014415893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0109193325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947042294","doi":"10.1007/s10899-019-09860-1","title":"Graphical Depiction of Statistical Information Improves Gambling-Related Judgments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Gambling Studies","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Depiction; Psychology; Statistical analysis; Graphical display; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Linguistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12095167507780985,"score_gpt":0.4391230338796383,"score_spread":0.31817135880182845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947042294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97965884,0.0005135997,0.0105429655,0.00038947325,0.00018368459,0.00014251312,0.00018503118,0.0008251965,0.007558594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791697,0.0003770077,0.017893696,0.00021454443,0.00007165513,0.000080943624,0.00025461896,0.00011793435,0.0018197369],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884075,0.00048770237,0.00011197563,0.00019972668,0.0002783093,0.00008169203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903714,0.006659204,0.0014294229,0.00075987313,0.0003401239,0.00044009005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001092867,0.0007942931,0.00059744925,0.0005067202,0.00015909536,0.0014374924,0.00044794948,0.00080343,0.0149878105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022799714,0.00027993272,0.00033351907,0.0002796169,0.00035132773,0.0018732473,0.0009053214,0.00087348965,0.0013066323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023158135,0.00665127,0.02601726,0.002653655,0.00030832557,0.00076508865,0.0022028678,0.0075647337,0.47457603,0.004663952,0.005824269,0.4456143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004059436,0.053067666,0.5112068,0.002034557,0.002113802,0.0031065214,0.0035693531,0.13034222,0.21562558,0.039833065,0.034059554,0.0009814176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031944926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003899234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0149878105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025249782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020902374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05013919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947323737","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1906.00296","title":"The Theory of Weak Revealed Preference","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Rationalization (economics); Minimax; Revealed preference; Pairwise comparison; Mathematical economics; Preference; Rationalizability; Economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Consumer choice; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Statistics; Nash equilibrium","score_opus":0.35167729410807846,"score_gpt":0.2817032317417254,"score_spread":0.06997406236635306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947323737","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016135568,0.001320811,0.9482428,0.0039680204,0.00016337463,0.000072071925,0.00031704543,0.000102250975,0.029678054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7238123,0.003711271,0.25449014,0.0022830018,0.0008257074,0.00079898076,0.0004931347,0.00012058664,0.013464792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99202263,0.0042230715,0.00046289625,0.000948559,0.0019488513,0.00039394747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884376,0.0069491356,0.0010461931,0.0021019434,0.0012014658,0.00026362302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008194007,0.0010943338,0.0013505226,0.0017131934,0.0013021568,0.0049131135,0.0022852481,0.002312172,0.004503644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018409897,0.0006938567,0.001815223,0.0025564765,0.006557688,0.009935794,0.0030122905,0.0041870447,0.0010806271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061071423,0.000003624679,0.000064066146,0.000028586814,0.000011963192,0.000011114579,0.0000418293,0.0012962549,0.00008865977,0.9960914,0.0002824823,0.0020736847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045510237,0.000006944501,0.000025740312,0.000008926939,0.000003899556,0.000010380446,0.0000074048294,0.0059061316,0.00007327406,0.9926564,0.0012920714,0.0000041759913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010379223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006379043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008194007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028451316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001584108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043334603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947373391","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-17925-0_6","title":"What We Can Learn","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.21529474010764693,"score_gpt":0.39066499576838437,"score_spread":0.17537025566073744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947373391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010858062,0.04845832,0.015230062,0.17617162,0.013052149,0.000035924055,0.00027923877,0.00022535147,0.74546146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03310775,0.06753001,0.012649308,0.071724884,0.011496239,0.0001372261,0.0005256016,0.0002841019,0.80254483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989378,0.0003886411,0.000030357982,0.00012601553,0.0003997816,0.00011748358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980704,0.00096067315,0.00006694505,0.00028084865,0.00034180793,0.00027930533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025468257,0.00072965317,0.0006331381,0.00077789027,0.0015673917,0.0061483425,0.0011697665,0.0024775653,0.0632166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005672395,0.00026661536,0.00045941913,0.0008296892,0.005850884,0.01077968,0.0027591952,0.0054412205,0.029916292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011693967,0.000055390443,0.0001498393,0.0002385468,0.000011174243,0.000039376537,0.00056414964,0.0002882785,0.00011312783,0.49496615,0.35394353,0.14961874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029587136,0.0000068734375,0.00007564651,0.000319799,0.000002749628,0.00003353325,0.00028894475,0.0001211585,0.00006245145,0.31337452,0.6857048,0.000006520189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024931629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004511422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0632166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019473308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037579408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21148056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948011249","doi":"10.1002/icd.2133","title":"The effect of psychological distance on young children's future predictions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Infant and Child Development","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Distancing; Preference; Task (project management); Futures studies; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Psychological research; Cognitive psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)","score_opus":0.0174920268372856,"score_gpt":0.3246487558126567,"score_spread":0.30715672897537105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948011249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99875677,0.00010275244,0.0001251266,0.000025505904,0.0000027240333,0.000004591564,0.00005709394,0.000012357797,0.00091304316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998833,0.000112354384,0.00057186803,0.00001192922,0.0000020796447,0.0000109811845,0.000104439154,0.0000073490287,0.00034603066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846363,0.00033486544,0.00016430259,0.00025534397,0.0005332715,0.00024867296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98372436,0.00816795,0.004864747,0.001012829,0.00091058644,0.0013194452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020835209,0.0005299369,0.00042861787,0.0004819478,0.00021336082,0.0015362288,0.0004233751,0.00048191586,0.0029659986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018222775,0.00032793113,0.00048401972,0.00023660029,0.0006571781,0.00075319526,0.0010222493,0.0010476795,0.00026765018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019133352,0.0008360325,0.91028684,0.000307705,0.00026726097,0.0011661941,0.007803218,0.0021027639,0.03435731,0.00074660586,0.0006978249,0.039514985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025412666,0.00088775216,0.9876867,0.000069335794,0.000085845415,0.0003968282,0.0018953844,0.0011973219,0.006417619,0.00033594648,0.0009620142,0.000039803366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052677416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071176873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052677416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041992444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040814155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011018872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948022226","doi":"10.1142/s1084946719500055","title":"GENDER DIFFERENCES IN ATTITUDES TOWARD RISK: EVIDENCE FROM ENTREPRENUERS IN GHANA AND UGANDA","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Risk aversion (psychology); Perception; Gender gap; Demographic economics; Psychology; Risk perception; Social psychology; Economics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.1759959697721275,"score_gpt":0.3570825888944674,"score_spread":0.18108661912233992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948022226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99940825,0.00010911141,0.000036087073,0.000031458207,0.0000021099095,0.0000036752056,0.00008742376,3.4719724e-7,0.00032139404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992317,0.00019411827,0.00006420374,0.000030544204,0.0000023125704,0.000010497008,0.00013546161,0.0000012571608,0.0003299117],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948525,0.00022912132,0.000036088335,0.00006449832,0.00006625574,0.00011877399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749076,0.00087998563,0.0010082382,0.00014514136,0.00021801621,0.00025792816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010045384,0.00021685481,0.00034152696,0.00085409527,0.0007474693,0.0007898588,0.0002266884,0.00031625264,0.0022618715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043526446,0.00029055614,0.00020634317,0.0012714559,0.0007170065,0.0005224133,0.0010414054,0.0004952139,0.00032233202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014761699,0.000096619755,0.9701589,0.000043023523,0.00003184766,0.00024329152,0.02074223,0.000024247815,0.00025251025,0.00019706182,0.00033183885,0.0077308603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072204175,0.00007677498,0.9691672,0.000059904738,0.000016271584,0.000176139,0.028898092,0.000086141314,0.00011024852,0.00012027707,0.0012757836,0.000005917547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014408268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026907971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014408268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028566414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024541205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028648794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950557080","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01506","title":"Editorial: Judgment and Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Perspectives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Ministère de la Défense Nationale","keywords":"Normative; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04472268416277513,"score_gpt":0.3877273280745118,"score_spread":0.3430046439117367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950557080","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021508462,0.003219867,0.00012397714,0.026175104,0.9694519,0.0000130963,0.000048087135,0.000025050389,0.00092142186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00047504526,0.003695994,0.000107536114,0.010855922,0.9802255,0.000021857375,0.000029269635,0.000024317385,0.004564544],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99330103,0.0014560884,0.0010084634,0.00070994336,0.0031551279,0.00036931795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94363314,0.030495137,0.0022814763,0.0008259248,0.019247092,0.0035170966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077579156,0.0048504546,0.005538933,0.005685864,0.004108778,0.009905417,0.004747592,0.015856586,0.018418347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05390256,0.0010993116,0.0028108815,0.0027967535,0.0032600593,0.0051070475,0.0015781567,0.019185646,0.012998516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033722226,0.000008867892,0.000012805496,0.00017175035,0.000013322125,0.000055655364,0.000009065461,0.000028318533,0.000019153787,0.00033422437,0.996689,0.0026241015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014942899,0.000045656572,0.00033589426,0.0015032899,0.00011535641,0.00042894247,0.00009850747,0.00055225997,0.00016363147,0.005277791,0.99127966,0.000049629598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018464194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038571625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018418347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032594167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038514594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061615467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951077818","doi":"","title":"\"Money, less problems\": Wealth level affects the selection of optimal endpoint in an aiming task with positive and negative outcomes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Task (project management); Point (geometry); Psychology; Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15803512754323856,"score_gpt":0.3912383683658394,"score_spread":0.23320324082260085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951077818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977077,0.000025120844,0.0003115611,0.000036043093,0.0000065100776,0.00001649575,0.000026538011,0.000010699537,0.001859215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99700147,0.000033701028,0.0015619985,0.00008225555,0.000004964534,0.000076429904,0.00006665667,0.00002051936,0.0011520608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950254,0.00019210413,0.000046831883,0.00010236499,0.00010395033,0.000052273648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99339116,0.003949869,0.0014361687,0.0004089409,0.00013496171,0.00067889126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015392342,0.00046484027,0.00035422895,0.0003094126,0.00033818377,0.001305621,0.00038355257,0.0008417579,0.00998883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0131761655,0.00037489837,0.00026243067,0.0001609233,0.00050613226,0.0010936846,0.0010614693,0.000945483,0.0005356199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04917194,0.009620223,0.40599057,0.0015501607,0.00089632947,0.0014906783,0.016104612,0.006284753,0.40252563,0.007090695,0.004018208,0.09525627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011153754,0.0055254255,0.9696593,0.00013258624,0.00034668096,0.0004212208,0.0015532571,0.008023237,0.006748347,0.004961129,0.0013938844,0.000119585486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061264803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070088205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00998883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018960837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020784106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033416033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952571822","doi":"","title":"A Measure of Decision Flexibility","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Measure (data warehouse); Decision maker; Variety (cybernetics); Perspective (graphical); Computer science; Value (mathematics); Decision model; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Management science; Machine learning; Data mining","score_opus":0.3615174583195565,"score_gpt":0.30306867819917177,"score_spread":0.058448780120384736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952571822","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2745777,0.0015925306,0.6628446,0.0024333405,0.00024794118,0.00032823088,0.0009291643,0.0002879077,0.056758568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9406143,0.00023088131,0.05776455,0.0001260859,0.000073721014,0.00021234881,0.00020856499,0.000030762512,0.00073882367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864912,0.0061802366,0.00091675343,0.0018260706,0.0038431352,0.0007425587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9556387,0.027861387,0.0061731916,0.0054585515,0.0027225388,0.0021457488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012563049,0.0017236351,0.0011214606,0.004971452,0.00094584475,0.0052564545,0.0016105473,0.0020292848,0.005623176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066141136,0.00034494593,0.0016093634,0.0031040583,0.004304329,0.006794204,0.0036436545,0.0023999251,0.00047508153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006416469,0.00039063874,0.022670578,0.00044996175,0.0009560283,0.00034351042,0.0017296558,0.16129257,0.0047227484,0.6903278,0.0019003195,0.11457459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046586574,0.0006439627,0.011443151,0.00016821889,0.00011478918,0.00022454001,0.00086203835,0.1131492,0.0012724454,0.8675386,0.0043765795,0.00015985809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005912399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048959756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012563049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020135648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093565095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06644052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952746491","doi":"10.1101/351312","title":"Time preferences are reliable across time-horizons and verbal vs. experiential tasks","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader; New York University Shanghai; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Experiential learning; Context (archaeology); Delay discounting; Discounting; Psychology; Time preference; Preference; Cognitive psychology; Time horizon; Task (project management); Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Impulsivity","score_opus":0.045930191324052884,"score_gpt":0.3127030774616472,"score_spread":0.2667728861375943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952746491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960102,0.00008485172,0.002671835,0.000024421057,0.000012386983,0.0000073076226,0.00015777504,0.000019785019,0.0010115232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99793977,0.000037708905,0.0012569457,0.000024232499,0.0000108159265,0.000013526461,0.00018430957,0.000028578525,0.00050402264],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991073,0.00027314472,0.0000801335,0.000247762,0.00023119937,0.00006042855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925385,0.0033972855,0.0021597312,0.0010054738,0.0004091311,0.00048983627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016745165,0.000370625,0.00029259265,0.0002778868,0.00011237203,0.0007678775,0.00024772203,0.00027657632,0.0029042664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009821463,0.0001889617,0.00014865353,0.00020247568,0.00047449887,0.00034229588,0.00051877275,0.0005612492,0.00028220296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012598489,0.0014206558,0.14069714,0.00046795202,0.00040754984,0.00015645726,0.0023748947,0.00236779,0.77185863,0.00249588,0.0007504973,0.06440414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019661339,0.0019769236,0.8597354,0.00005468276,0.00022075331,0.00037772005,0.00059720356,0.009116333,0.120307185,0.0054062502,0.0018711014,0.00013980243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004977223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051819504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029042664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011053484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013018107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009715736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952887472","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3590216","title":"Are ISS Recommendations Informative? Evidence from Assessments of Compensation Practices","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Psychology; Actuarial science; Business; Social psychology","score_opus":0.33843875767732523,"score_gpt":0.49040597641332845,"score_spread":0.15196721873600322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952887472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9109924,0.019233042,0.0036914859,0.010031332,0.0003684659,0.0005046662,0.002372231,0.00006298642,0.052743398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99256414,0.0029215298,0.0014001352,0.0010897066,0.00023819841,0.00009625509,0.00070247496,0.000011392109,0.00097618654],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8655316,0.077384174,0.0151562495,0.0061613065,0.033413183,0.0023534687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.10611398,0.76914996,0.086907245,0.017223418,0.018720048,0.0018852863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11186763,0.0010409058,0.0014695514,0.007049839,0.0012143516,0.0054138205,0.003338766,0.007458507,0.011757282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5746353,0.00095048716,0.0017997562,0.005441984,0.0035298397,0.0055060512,0.0025353332,0.0045012077,0.0015621642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011491982,0.0030347889,0.7625212,0.0036299543,0.0048840856,0.00031435807,0.0059293304,0.002988698,0.00048759312,0.004101692,0.006085807,0.19453046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019451015,0.005638403,0.9298821,0.0060705957,0.0051004714,0.0006169935,0.007894617,0.0061794394,0.0024570609,0.014713971,0.019278865,0.00022219107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049028224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005498742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11186763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016486588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027657396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5916196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953323811","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511808098.026","title":"Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Irrationality; Psychology; Rationality; Epistemology; Cognition; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2320080355411214,"score_gpt":0.3271246426150358,"score_spread":0.09511660707391442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953323811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4181416,0.04160934,0.023437895,0.34064817,0.0012770657,0.00013893141,0.000613207,0.00016752878,0.1739663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790867,0.004553764,0.0032916805,0.009412133,0.0010832504,0.000059342703,0.00011226245,0.000055177814,0.0023457853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99310523,0.0025816155,0.0002774241,0.0018800414,0.0017329023,0.00042279135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9539644,0.03544789,0.0034087675,0.0038061147,0.0020159776,0.0013568377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017097333,0.00048765185,0.0011359839,0.0017705061,0.00092718087,0.0049949894,0.002819293,0.0047211177,0.010360145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0433629,0.00032951,0.0007913162,0.0018086091,0.016809076,0.008993482,0.003257617,0.0046717566,0.0006648024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071162905,0.00056042674,0.03642602,0.00038821218,0.00047098918,0.00057141396,0.016318034,0.0015806702,0.0008301161,0.8329382,0.006886901,0.10231736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118033706,0.000087215725,0.044246756,0.0001711411,0.000062973406,0.00027613415,0.0044798753,0.00121734,0.00020330373,0.9386306,0.010448541,0.00005819202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004053023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022645786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017097333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017721638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012821747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090420425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954673385","doi":"10.1007/s00780-019-00399-y","title":"Dual utilities on risk aggregation under dependence uncertainty","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Finance and Stochastics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Ambiguity; Mathematical economics; Preference; Expected utility hypothesis; Ambiguity aversion; Economics; Subjective expected utility; Econometrics; Mathematics; Decision maker; Marginal utility; Aggregate (composite); Expected shortfall; Upper and lower bounds; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Risk management; Microeconomics; Operations research","score_opus":0.07117512660900761,"score_gpt":0.3458142422880111,"score_spread":0.2746391156790035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954673385","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1741006,0.0015508033,0.79590976,0.0032751656,0.00019451285,0.00007888028,0.00039612176,0.00008812546,0.024406005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94282836,0.00090205204,0.046227586,0.00021832719,0.0002890416,0.00011995641,0.00019567738,0.000052383988,0.009166546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972639,0.0016200709,0.00013512705,0.00025964357,0.0004638691,0.00025736933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900677,0.007147878,0.00060858147,0.0007017146,0.0008098011,0.00066436146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045073936,0.0010002023,0.0015688094,0.001937022,0.0005410611,0.003940644,0.0011387207,0.0016571435,0.0040230933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015159234,0.0006717949,0.0010583663,0.0016822426,0.0023488686,0.007647202,0.0027972097,0.0023129354,0.0002867994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006208204,0.00004468822,0.00033893654,0.00004798925,0.000029686667,0.00006206334,0.00010262565,0.017146101,0.0002694579,0.97447157,0.00070903526,0.0067158127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010165121,0.000016147147,0.00018269783,0.000015877944,0.000014027304,0.00003384537,0.000030843814,0.08743596,0.00008657402,0.91165954,0.0005040664,0.000010296948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011312825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006590217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045073936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022331954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080475095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023837626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955032915","doi":"10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.05.002","title":"No Peak-End Rule for Simple Positive Experiences Observed in Children and Adults","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Psychology; Simple (philosophy); Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1297104871082893,"score_gpt":0.4168629940346397,"score_spread":0.2871525069263504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955032915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99149454,0.0001943378,0.0021361243,0.000049146274,0.00001729079,0.00006133491,0.00018252882,0.000036886242,0.0058278637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970214,0.00005896759,0.0020488289,0.000095173986,0.000009162911,0.000051417977,0.00023778857,0.000018329903,0.000458859],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998381,0.00019563273,0.00015396654,0.0006530364,0.00050945324,0.000106808075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731933,0.013833658,0.006726717,0.003232324,0.0016041165,0.0014099287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003650946,0.00023839393,0.00054890104,0.0005732988,0.0003813728,0.001161004,0.0004268043,0.000546321,0.0027885295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023588935,0.00037281963,0.00036634447,0.0002699003,0.00092778186,0.0010355237,0.00075760763,0.0009611762,0.0005223266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023486812,0.0004848625,0.8805205,0.0003262641,0.00019085451,0.0005580291,0.0044547087,0.0005405464,0.050674412,0.0030077058,0.0012714475,0.05562195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007361575,0.0008928408,0.9833561,0.000039239465,0.000043308057,0.0010241362,0.0008315234,0.0014193978,0.008735254,0.0023213816,0.0012180856,0.0000451429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089553965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020270997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003650946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026925906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003519682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019308269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955339725","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102863","title":"Understanding the cognitive miser: Cue-utilization in effort-based decision making","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Psychologica","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Cognition; Task (project management); Control (management); Action selection; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Cognitive psychology; Action (physics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Executive functions; Contrast (vision); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Perception; Neuroscience; Economics","score_opus":0.44736802295896555,"score_gpt":0.47076053930528006,"score_spread":0.023392516346314507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955339725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75457895,0.00333773,0.21673943,0.005588468,0.00017793731,0.00007438492,0.00017900347,0.00013880972,0.019185336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98416716,0.0004515373,0.014447595,0.00014381691,0.000059748498,0.000022069325,0.000029614064,0.000027554554,0.0006509275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987192,0.0006428226,0.000061863015,0.00024026391,0.00021330157,0.00012240856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835037,0.012740762,0.0016799147,0.0009006095,0.0007300565,0.00044491704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038390649,0.00060577336,0.0005607821,0.0011572113,0.00044557254,0.004621636,0.0008032182,0.0016395366,0.0034728947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027773675,0.0005177011,0.00044836305,0.0008438142,0.0017713179,0.007697038,0.0012891225,0.0016960326,0.0002636196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014927642,0.0011960737,0.09765185,0.0010381654,0.0006757334,0.00073444407,0.0076579927,0.07672427,0.02638117,0.5425382,0.002461538,0.24144785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006549512,0.0002898353,0.06399651,0.0001555949,0.00017982797,0.00028174516,0.0014648418,0.21350193,0.005209781,0.71253467,0.0021910581,0.00012869289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021207652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014054198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004621636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073489983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008530697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02030313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956977098","doi":"10.1007/s11409-019-09198-4","title":"Does domain matter? Monitoring accuracy across domains","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental Health; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Overconfidence effect; Task (project management); Calibration; Psychology; Generality; Resolution (logic); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Domain (mathematical analysis); Artificial intelligence; Metacognition; Domain knowledge; Computer science; Machine learning; Developmental psychology; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0662592283616116,"score_gpt":0.39904623244513565,"score_spread":0.332787004083524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956977098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946964,0.000390697,0.0020161925,0.0002903907,0.000022435725,0.000008620902,0.00022303106,0.000026685115,0.002325539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99906427,0.00007497216,0.0004043498,0.000053238866,0.000015783311,0.0000046043233,0.00015111982,0.000014500871,0.00021715087],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981002,0.0006405751,0.00018258834,0.00057018636,0.00029008594,0.00021627473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9226865,0.05017784,0.013802749,0.009194714,0.0024978071,0.0016404086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004998206,0.0004520887,0.00079594564,0.0010154031,0.00028781345,0.0026789655,0.0007215232,0.0015052281,0.0029809363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06481548,0.0003558273,0.00051462493,0.0010371607,0.000880775,0.004166236,0.0012255318,0.0012808728,0.00057286344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029057155,0.000419879,0.92796254,0.00016167984,0.00066172256,0.00010475095,0.00081592967,0.005085874,0.005582414,0.0019075532,0.00060295826,0.05378892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005983751,0.00029111528,0.9748744,0.000057194036,0.00023007316,0.00020380203,0.0003857854,0.0097435005,0.0025173526,0.010875841,0.0007213464,0.00003966713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019670732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016282364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004998206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003513384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030360432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026433349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2960780327","doi":"10.3758/s13428-019-01270-w","title":"The role of number of items per trial in best–worst scaling experiments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavior Research Methods","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scaling; Latent semantic analysis; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Dimension (graph theory); Value (mathematics); Statistics; Cognitive psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Machine learning; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5703808539984128,"score_gpt":0.6897069463044384,"score_spread":0.11932609230602564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2960780327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7298953,0.0025498609,0.2390453,0.0021248758,0.0011896301,0.0010704701,0.00041851704,0.0012186721,0.022487378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8744831,0.0004417762,0.11568946,0.00082844496,0.00032984297,0.001856711,0.00019210162,0.0013235003,0.004855038],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9404617,0.043268856,0.0034689428,0.0056497017,0.0063655754,0.000785179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44009647,0.49098238,0.018651882,0.0404024,0.005293658,0.004573147],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06697114,0.002759442,0.0048795766,0.0013202475,0.0012510528,0.0054935347,0.003661048,0.0039357995,0.007762854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37659302,0.0020745837,0.0010771552,0.0009633303,0.0049676658,0.0122537175,0.003261169,0.0048850393,0.0009632568],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07480022,0.018824974,0.04559258,0.004247789,0.0021872337,0.0004296805,0.004075731,0.09054357,0.240292,0.08884327,0.0057594334,0.4244036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045918524,0.0136113865,0.08713251,0.00093345426,0.001484896,0.0006515452,0.0007390938,0.5181142,0.043039802,0.32276562,0.0060553635,0.00088025024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008192612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089435955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9330289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012212872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015198961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35418147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963142712","doi":"10.1007/s11238-017-9612-1","title":"Confidence biases and learning among intuitive Bayesians","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Contrarian; Overconfidence effect; Bayesian probability; Task (project management); Perception; Conservatism; Computer science; Phenomenon; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Probabilistic logic; Psychology; Machine learning; Social psychology; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13014408484338472,"score_gpt":0.42261229900778424,"score_spread":0.2924682141643995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963142712","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39861864,0.002254173,0.5773835,0.007357182,0.0001782436,0.000075467826,0.00024842107,0.00019725082,0.013687182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96514213,0.0008545634,0.031404775,0.00050236343,0.00023796177,0.00006832267,0.0001346455,0.00005309817,0.0016022047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922037,0.0046073594,0.0004363323,0.0011756079,0.0011549566,0.0004219429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75780654,0.21794514,0.00953651,0.007088562,0.0058728284,0.001750388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019971047,0.0007589864,0.0013296144,0.002238787,0.0007163597,0.005624646,0.0018352756,0.0027792237,0.0051590404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.228363,0.001036378,0.00096505083,0.0015307502,0.0048613604,0.0107655125,0.002728419,0.0037345611,0.00036796578],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033035545,0.00013899077,0.009390255,0.00027274128,0.00023932525,0.00012650451,0.00093722413,0.043096088,0.0005514563,0.8904713,0.001574196,0.052871685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020144666,0.000012041508,0.0009108855,0.0000204452,0.000016842867,0.000022566272,0.00003383501,0.034969773,0.00011871697,0.9636347,0.00022450903,0.000015501304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016673965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009883676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019971047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015278064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089867454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10561824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964206029","doi":"10.1111/sode.12395","title":"The socializing role of logical consequences, mild punishments, and reasoning in rule‐breaking contexts involving multifaceted issues","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Development","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Logical reasoning; Developmental psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07846018603710746,"score_gpt":0.3804586030005637,"score_spread":0.30199841696345625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964206029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996195,0.000011305709,0.00007399247,0.000010902977,7.2092143e-7,0.0000043838186,0.0000014779374,6.9107216e-7,0.00027700074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996749,0.000022116918,0.00021910958,0.00000585812,0.0000010149699,0.000009243588,0.0000038079436,6.7344445e-7,0.000063153755],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779993,0.0014390949,0.000096509946,0.00019183377,0.00032574034,0.00014687785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913549,0.005025705,0.002381651,0.00036397472,0.00017565503,0.00069815904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028792855,0.00028507592,0.0002188263,0.00039960796,0.00045165364,0.0014176234,0.00027710025,0.0003084401,0.00097605184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0103031015,0.0002298021,0.00015901952,0.00012852911,0.0014526353,0.0005273819,0.00093360996,0.0010946576,0.00003636822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016558556,0.015977269,0.8096214,0.00027270959,0.00021719382,0.0008233082,0.0441624,0.0018710329,0.040141456,0.007847972,0.00025721834,0.07715223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011620107,0.0026883073,0.96464545,0.000071164985,0.00008590949,0.00029181008,0.017174486,0.0041042413,0.00711313,0.0025883336,0.0010827759,0.000038159935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010269393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019290108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028792855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043138373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037848722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015227318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964612905","doi":"10.1177/0956797619861429","title":"Debiasing Training Improves Decision Making in the Field","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"Fondation HEC","keywords":"Debiasing; Psychology; Training (meteorology); Field (mathematics); Field training; Cognitive psychology; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Medical education","score_opus":0.22885715513107951,"score_gpt":0.5186872590913891,"score_spread":0.2898301039603096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964612905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978219,0.000047122616,0.00061089254,0.00009553689,0.0000074528803,0.000032301148,0.000006746151,0.000022486076,0.0013555926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969844,0.00005654528,0.0020900287,0.000059928254,0.000005478813,0.000027085427,0.000015937241,0.000003235328,0.0007572933],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994791,0.00023547381,0.00003203041,0.00010451829,0.00006973595,0.00007921412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99329525,0.0041407296,0.0010701388,0.00057099847,0.00017455163,0.00074827735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015086326,0.00024681506,0.00022710334,0.00026202737,0.00028436474,0.00044786304,0.0003391446,0.0004076866,0.005108865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010013769,0.00011813303,0.00011281781,0.00008741726,0.00043738444,0.00036515394,0.0004074451,0.0006426892,0.0003690182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013344206,0.044113427,0.07429604,0.00086614385,0.00018644852,0.00028976696,0.0047973604,0.004077394,0.18400197,0.0020005973,0.0024894276,0.66953725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024980505,0.08765956,0.6865963,0.0006813124,0.00026740442,0.00069218216,0.005210756,0.030860372,0.15186962,0.017689876,0.01574854,0.00022604117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004295986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005954596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005108865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023642644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037887748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017090857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965931042","doi":"10.1177/0963721419855658","title":"Logic, Fast and Slow: Advances in Dual-Process Theorizing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Directions in Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":247,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Sketch; Dual (grammatical number); Process (computing); Inference; Dual process theory (moral psychology); Cognitive science; Deliberation; Logical reasoning; Psychology; Task (project management); Key (lock); Thinking processes; Epistemology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Moral reasoning; Algorithm","score_opus":0.12607698837945877,"score_gpt":0.5129724884774227,"score_spread":0.3868955000979639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965931042","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021016758,0.2552151,0.5676956,0.05831332,0.0019304785,0.000082233564,0.0001543785,0.00019811175,0.09539403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6001378,0.2062345,0.16544482,0.008141691,0.008294722,0.00028201443,0.00016973402,0.00024796286,0.011046737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964935,0.0014021369,0.00016727702,0.0006142216,0.0011467309,0.000176136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99012345,0.0072740903,0.0005754586,0.00085085316,0.0008298823,0.00034635473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067550824,0.000887802,0.0014575385,0.0029080028,0.0010366712,0.0058936523,0.0028266325,0.0027535118,0.0032484543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010228549,0.00061864,0.0013592234,0.0025623683,0.013153603,0.014140676,0.0035979897,0.008014834,0.0008261411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013610179,0.000014582929,0.00014253466,0.00012321239,0.000010527639,0.000025734054,0.0001259792,0.0007534603,0.00006503923,0.98845273,0.00057299493,0.009699602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041760327,0.0000052187024,0.00007695774,0.000046507263,0.000005663827,0.000027471911,0.000024923263,0.0020199928,0.00004040417,0.9928992,0.0048418194,0.000007677487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014533112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007706327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067550824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035275142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018390487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0357247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967056191","doi":"10.7554/elife.49154","title":"Metacontrol of decision-making strategies in human aging","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eLife","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Cognitive aging; Situational ethics; Task (project management); Cognition; Dynamic decision-making; Psychology; Adaptation (eye); Cognitive psychology; Successful aging; Iowa gambling task; Stability (learning theory); Contrast (vision); Computer science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Gerontology; Machine learning; Medicine; Neuroscience; Economics","score_opus":0.06585860026297663,"score_gpt":0.42490870457575414,"score_spread":0.3590501043127775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967056191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972699,0.000245295,0.0013232421,0.000038403246,0.0000036552192,0.000010752634,0.00003245222,0.000010236085,0.0010659001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997945,0.000111239846,0.0015035078,0.000023201661,0.0000042044144,0.000014081031,0.00005126604,0.0000032061755,0.00034440903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996505,0.00012264849,0.000030481884,0.000070268616,0.000091318456,0.000034839268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734503,0.0008927974,0.0009815253,0.00029583595,0.00021045921,0.0002743168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011962701,0.00042714828,0.00022866447,0.00047565612,0.00017231751,0.00081429677,0.00019558292,0.00031213308,0.0010105353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066770385,0.00022659311,0.00016586046,0.00015407222,0.00038083998,0.00057059136,0.00046012495,0.00046122455,0.00012286037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015207627,0.0020893076,0.720957,0.00030672664,0.000467692,0.00044204202,0.0068200366,0.005173799,0.06358468,0.0038314243,0.00069251074,0.19411395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038757862,0.0006236879,0.9799483,0.000028296752,0.00007110594,0.00032660077,0.0004060906,0.006323528,0.003528769,0.0076813498,0.0009808041,0.000042766038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012075325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014312507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0012075325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024251941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002574572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006326556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967278765","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3233955","title":"Needs Versus Wants: Which Motivates More Effort?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.06626153073602628,"score_gpt":0.38170210721636594,"score_spread":0.31544057648033963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967278765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9126893,0.0006448926,0.0035971312,0.011361559,0.00015032035,0.00008124022,0.00009485118,0.000039385213,0.071341224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955037,0.0001695,0.0016251319,0.0007939469,0.000053679625,0.000027615202,0.000029528455,0.000028850318,0.0017681577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808806,0.0010167873,0.0000660193,0.00018548602,0.0002975475,0.00034606486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982268,0.009184611,0.0026553131,0.0008633514,0.00094139605,0.0040873447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037426567,0.0003241409,0.00046322402,0.0005933605,0.0009415922,0.0035254515,0.00047314705,0.0025258402,0.011691257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01749911,0.00031710888,0.0003680252,0.0005051979,0.0015202116,0.002026927,0.0011626763,0.0014728612,0.0009935579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029102927,0.008193075,0.58206725,0.0014984275,0.00062931696,0.0015304564,0.011165504,0.0018139674,0.018577196,0.11346029,0.010810812,0.2473435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006445765,0.0017417404,0.67263216,0.0006656886,0.0007177732,0.0012185485,0.028515052,0.010596307,0.004311583,0.25460458,0.0241861,0.0001660051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053375034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001830899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011691257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005482017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010607863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039111078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970094891","doi":"10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2102","title":"Delay Discounting as a Transdiagnostic Process in Psychiatric Disorders","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"JAMA Psychiatry","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":406,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton","funders":"","keywords":"PsycINFO; Psychology; Meta-analysis; Borderline personality disorder; Clinical psychology; MEDLINE; Discounting; Delay discounting; Psychiatry; Impulsivity; Medicine","score_opus":0.1057808425814239,"score_gpt":0.46516555825593936,"score_spread":0.35938471567451546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970094891","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031235218,0.9504512,0.010410051,0.0026788067,0.00093905407,0.0008103363,0.0011819336,0.000040351464,0.002253068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69807845,0.2758155,0.01856956,0.0026045695,0.0014630493,0.0014609335,0.0013350175,0.00004129588,0.0006315571],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9666313,0.020461991,0.0058784224,0.0027523986,0.003980397,0.0002955176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85188407,0.11797507,0.024878193,0.0029134983,0.0020140624,0.00033509496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041022766,0.0014341213,0.0034139436,0.0044587622,0.0004634775,0.0040330123,0.0020533956,0.0016914965,0.0021308316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11487087,0.0008980745,0.010525089,0.0045798556,0.0020069222,0.00301147,0.0016473313,0.0027479408,0.000116668314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005797693,0.00021485356,0.16936333,0.26419702,0.31964025,0.00045826597,0.0016011439,0.004628393,0.0005212037,0.012989126,0.0034959074,0.21709287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032981692,0.0024155525,0.18557577,0.217758,0.49994504,0.0022546086,0.0012221576,0.011289894,0.0017837158,0.049574036,0.024317054,0.0005659729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043314938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052378057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041022766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021489023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028164017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21695173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970136895","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3099746","title":"The Quantity Integration Effect: Integrating Purchase and Quantity Decisions Increases Sales by Providing Closure","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Marketing; Business; Robustness (evolution); Control (management); Computer science; Advertising; Accounting","score_opus":0.04563230780124244,"score_gpt":0.3729167999343486,"score_spread":0.3272844921331062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970136895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.953084,0.00055524486,0.01189734,0.0013537103,0.00015497736,0.00016914585,0.00025108448,0.00017707274,0.032357395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99343175,0.00013506004,0.0032898705,0.0003328834,0.00010802413,0.000046023746,0.00012739257,0.000045515066,0.0024835079],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980629,0.00051991857,0.00014895675,0.00041823028,0.0005291527,0.00032082552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9600017,0.026432693,0.006474896,0.003096431,0.0010239151,0.0029704198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003099162,0.0006155308,0.001282678,0.00061336544,0.0007329275,0.0025662517,0.0008755753,0.0022476108,0.027826294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020180093,0.0006222575,0.001193127,0.0005058701,0.0016453619,0.0051586293,0.0025922896,0.002219677,0.0010357926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.037946366,0.03760428,0.3007893,0.0028822965,0.0013507621,0.0017232527,0.0023427072,0.02818139,0.09526882,0.12324414,0.009091187,0.35957554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028749453,0.019182105,0.66645443,0.00039465708,0.002524128,0.001049831,0.0026505233,0.06928734,0.0236861,0.19444375,0.017152296,0.00029983424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012305083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013195719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027826294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007035312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012026798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09308815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971069477","doi":"10.32470/ccn.2019.1359-0","title":"FEF Biases the Persistence of Expectation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Persistence (discontinuity); Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.3589947543367379,"score_gpt":0.42631655551099806,"score_spread":0.06732180117426018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971069477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94989365,0.00021049721,0.035899676,0.0017951092,0.00010169569,0.000010748516,0.00013297396,0.00018105717,0.011774545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980342,0.000037248454,0.0011960252,0.00009422586,0.000026610061,0.0000031592624,0.00003881879,0.00002640409,0.00054322666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991709,0.00025040866,0.000047204005,0.00022012457,0.00016771653,0.00014373809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98228616,0.012893749,0.0016925376,0.0017177317,0.00075590034,0.0006539808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029122962,0.00029627385,0.0005075178,0.0004823136,0.00029448452,0.0026266288,0.0004035933,0.0013268567,0.004849486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037878923,0.00035636048,0.00032415453,0.00025212014,0.0007529789,0.0019924357,0.00075272814,0.0014823816,0.00059284637],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042624874,0.00096158136,0.2621443,0.00039066913,0.0006824745,0.00093481713,0.0016189644,0.05670979,0.097776346,0.3011884,0.0061818617,0.26714835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014877923,0.0006648,0.2343789,0.00009484821,0.0002134042,0.0009863384,0.0005546862,0.25165272,0.0149290385,0.49304694,0.003157226,0.00017220994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010931127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006986827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004849486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071876094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041973553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016223192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971443674","doi":"10.1108/vjikms-12-2018-0129","title":"If numbers could “feel”: How well do executives trust their intuition?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Psychology; Social psychology; Knowledge management; Computer science","score_opus":0.031816078604875925,"score_gpt":0.3134838036022219,"score_spread":0.28166772499734594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971443674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9631533,0.0036476448,0.0050066994,0.007730611,0.00016775436,0.000038401973,0.000106169566,0.000047428563,0.02010193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975641,0.00043973088,0.00047923884,0.00094560604,0.000025956657,0.000009004966,0.000030830197,0.00000759405,0.0004980756],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98941565,0.006300505,0.0006039677,0.00067497086,0.0022768257,0.00072807464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9232559,0.035513137,0.021901304,0.005250431,0.009737835,0.004341391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013532475,0.0003467496,0.00047580077,0.0014831518,0.0013971652,0.008125355,0.00051073165,0.0010525425,0.0027081333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071235366,0.00034248017,0.00056601915,0.0007417222,0.0043078144,0.0049447496,0.0019962187,0.0019697852,0.0006546208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085575425,0.00020873868,0.6503265,0.00072766794,0.0007090445,0.0012584976,0.15894027,0.0007676113,0.003225028,0.011643725,0.009231083,0.1621062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007640068,0.001203438,0.5911828,0.0018499752,0.00036245273,0.002220736,0.30987003,0.0029581937,0.0023497085,0.03490766,0.05252057,0.0004979782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023951055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024437774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013532475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017137285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014516783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071567416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972845345","doi":"10.1017/beq.2019.19","title":"Big Data and Personalized Pricing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Big data; Reservation; Point (geometry); Economics; Microeconomics; Welfare; Public economics; Business; Market economy; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.39761866616654307,"score_gpt":0.4326414813813234,"score_spread":0.035022815214780345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972845345","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072301656,0.018675653,0.23841955,0.3746277,0.0047107465,0.00020649412,0.0009280947,0.00039660712,0.2897336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95287776,0.0053241574,0.01981661,0.011503937,0.0020862091,0.00012762261,0.00020203106,0.000095881915,0.007965749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932915,0.0037172167,0.0002586098,0.000623239,0.0017583236,0.00035103242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96816987,0.02212226,0.002481699,0.00348777,0.002588383,0.0011500195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009503727,0.0004204954,0.00061356224,0.0014402891,0.0019032637,0.008042077,0.001314637,0.0040021366,0.0073292945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033867322,0.0003662671,0.0005153288,0.0023811134,0.008327761,0.010953434,0.0036236492,0.006372631,0.0008081529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005807309,0.000059360566,0.0033130355,0.00012172938,0.000056239205,0.00012185692,0.0004292699,0.0047255545,0.00010379003,0.9424658,0.016446427,0.032098945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012350472,0.00001903378,0.0011976575,0.0001840172,0.000012835774,0.00009936958,0.00035090387,0.010856208,0.00024665543,0.95942414,0.027570153,0.000026690406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017046178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015886817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009503727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029862584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002236063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05026108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973154528","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2154","title":"Examining children's ability to delay reward: Is the delay discounting task a suitable measure?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Research Councils UK","keywords":"Delay discounting; Discounting; Delay of gratification; Psychology; Gratification; Task (project management); Temporal discounting; Impulsivity; Sensation seeking; Intertemporal choice; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Econometrics; Economics","score_opus":0.09533285482985453,"score_gpt":0.3918347828173961,"score_spread":0.29650192798754155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973154528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99874544,0.00015319389,0.00031604737,0.00003602117,0.0000058751984,0.000011248106,0.00021261137,0.000006740389,0.0005128889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983234,0.00020564983,0.0010211838,0.000019315834,0.000004670484,0.000024223698,0.00021193599,0.0000048333773,0.0001848803],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992872,0.00018476076,0.00013080076,0.000100596684,0.00021233916,0.0000843269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888747,0.0032961147,0.0056877285,0.0005839751,0.00090168614,0.00065575825],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030135736,0.0004144269,0.0003723712,0.0009614501,0.000159877,0.0009434206,0.00038293423,0.0004905676,0.0010862879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014651127,0.00025293633,0.00045508574,0.00064169365,0.00041913457,0.0007266894,0.00038171178,0.0008953989,0.00023968228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015057225,0.00011251913,0.99096864,0.00004663345,0.00004085461,0.00008525184,0.000600003,0.00012605943,0.0018483438,0.00010546561,0.00016537726,0.0057503083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008737007,0.00027670607,0.99668175,0.000030766176,0.00002622226,0.0003269202,0.00041457705,0.00043081882,0.001298968,0.000116660754,0.00037757767,0.000010355564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047211577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007424165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99698645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002976518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030748177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015937448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W297316193","doi":"","title":"No Two Experiments are Identical","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Knightian uncertainty; Ambiguity aversion; Econometrics; Ball (mathematics); Relation (database); Mathematics; Psychology; Mathematical economics; Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Geometry","score_opus":0.1954498705061671,"score_gpt":0.48871590734404613,"score_spread":0.293266036837879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W297316193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52469176,0.0076972395,0.22161031,0.024021804,0.013855745,0.011022875,0.0072749797,0.0022476092,0.1875777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.842074,0.0017527853,0.08740889,0.019126922,0.0026358888,0.016609272,0.0023416171,0.00044576556,0.027604932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95420456,0.026931249,0.0024651934,0.00940295,0.0058355913,0.0011604307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9024389,0.046176877,0.010351861,0.03448048,0.004303724,0.0022481221],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033116486,0.0009787141,0.0028754524,0.0007469645,0.0011829507,0.004476756,0.0024919156,0.004068223,0.023798134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.097679965,0.0011978706,0.0011834573,0.0006706218,0.0042855437,0.0051839356,0.0033349919,0.0030562575,0.004726153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.052627336,0.00529741,0.021814007,0.006654381,0.0062110955,0.0008366112,0.0023694343,0.008438787,0.029505048,0.65036255,0.036742117,0.17914125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010626838,0.0065253093,0.013371016,0.00076717295,0.0011856377,0.0007487346,0.00035827374,0.008888641,0.0074495785,0.84275645,0.106915265,0.00040711722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031854512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036324485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96688354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001599861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014417177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17513883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978060606","doi":"10.1037/rev0000166","title":"Accumulating advantages: A new conceptualization of rapid multiple choice.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of South Australia","keywords":"Accumulator (cryptography); Hydraulic accumulator; Conceptualization; Binary number; Computer science; Benchmark (surveying); Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Mathematics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.3640301810318859,"score_gpt":0.5351487065253254,"score_spread":0.17111852549343953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978060606","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054245673,0.0028347094,0.79066336,0.0060816035,0.00020120366,0.00022181636,0.00049964397,0.00037875344,0.14487328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8299641,0.0012671544,0.15298872,0.0010768583,0.00018737106,0.00046905692,0.00017242724,0.00015673696,0.013717634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997695,0.00089207693,0.00010369281,0.000596112,0.00052531896,0.00018775823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99523455,0.0024309386,0.00075740414,0.00074701116,0.0004082695,0.00042186273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036467784,0.0008816335,0.00074320094,0.0022827457,0.0010577071,0.0052484274,0.0035086179,0.002255805,0.013923142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010242631,0.0005751947,0.0018270377,0.0018239651,0.0065586795,0.010527059,0.003669065,0.0039411797,0.0014052157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022649429,0.000019915444,0.00057663943,0.000042927033,0.000015292535,0.000046163696,0.00037714792,0.002944345,0.0003392799,0.98659956,0.00041982468,0.008596194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000142686185,0.00005100504,0.00087476184,0.000035645688,0.00002305826,0.00025342242,0.00014859297,0.035687324,0.00025555913,0.95276445,0.009867738,0.000024223915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024185553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002038857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013923142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030423182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018629798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046577513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978435530","doi":"10.1111/sjop.12583","title":"Measuring delay discounting in a crowdsourced sample: An exploratory study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Discounting; Delay discounting; Psychology; Sample (material); Matching (statistics); Task (project management); Measure (data warehouse); Compensation (psychology); Econometrics; Social psychology; Statistics; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.22935838170727837,"score_gpt":0.4488393980587884,"score_spread":0.21948101635151004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978435530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99795973,0.00002368371,0.0013261004,0.000020575017,0.0000038962594,0.00019612168,0.00011420894,0.0000060098396,0.00034966704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949477,0.00005290848,0.0034637146,0.00008216442,0.0000210744,0.00046002702,0.00023385271,0.000009372207,0.00072923896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974511,0.0011424663,0.00013477914,0.00042136948,0.0006869585,0.000163334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891621,0.005607328,0.0015438523,0.0014714011,0.0015815394,0.0006337435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051681357,0.00048235268,0.0004744469,0.00091651623,0.0010293548,0.00096162275,0.00078031805,0.00063362555,0.001115519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015520038,0.00021807608,0.0004642055,0.0006519187,0.0006156863,0.0007761591,0.0013188451,0.0006448999,0.0006599535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002287935,0.013173685,0.81663734,0.00043615355,0.00026667505,0.0025428399,0.0666991,0.0017667166,0.016395103,0.0014008211,0.0015739226,0.07681974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032397616,0.007382537,0.91921943,0.0001247988,0.00017829337,0.002358499,0.036164653,0.009109593,0.010496833,0.0027661247,0.011678134,0.00019719456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002332652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016558778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051681357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005189172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059476274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027332067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978760545","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12568","title":"Intuition versus Analytical Thinking and Impairment Testing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Audit; Psychology; Skepticism; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Accounting; Philosophy; Economics; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.4133382902365313,"score_gpt":0.491748148346807,"score_spread":0.07840985811027573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978760545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98762834,0.0000406784,0.0049198177,0.00015293504,0.000010946083,0.00005616596,0.000021043343,0.000025685116,0.007144421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99735886,0.000017215752,0.0021409215,0.000083117025,0.000005737908,0.00003028102,0.00001996982,0.0000052259547,0.00033861477],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839842,0.008381617,0.0011224148,0.001239157,0.0044458457,0.0008268156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7577576,0.1844474,0.03918751,0.009271171,0.0058046416,0.0035316476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016484989,0.000640259,0.0004467802,0.0011971975,0.0004728096,0.002617879,0.00078544626,0.0010776622,0.0036428908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12801044,0.00037078545,0.00043204936,0.00047468094,0.0027811932,0.0024691126,0.0023346848,0.0018040765,0.00029976148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009596348,0.0048699244,0.6788445,0.0008380803,0.00034799834,0.0010368074,0.02895109,0.014078012,0.061684296,0.024805015,0.0014314145,0.17351657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004381722,0.007832505,0.7978036,0.00047225098,0.00027912678,0.001762164,0.011938259,0.061334897,0.045793556,0.0680151,0.003818139,0.0005123275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008908572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061409053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016484989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079249305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011256321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087181985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979898024","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0220690","title":"Can knowledge of election results change recall of our predictions? Neural correlates of political hindsight bias","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre; University of Ottawa","funders":"Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan; National Chengchi University","keywords":"Hindsight bias; Recall; Context (archaeology); Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Neural correlates of consciousness; Cognitive psychology; Phenomenon; Inferior frontal gyrus; Psychology; Demographics; Cognition; Neuropsychology; Medicine; Neuroscience; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.33000569542831787,"score_gpt":0.3766594115940871,"score_spread":0.04665371616576924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979898024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978157,0.000113281334,0.0007329501,0.00011929517,0.000008132046,0.000010364301,0.000042161337,0.000009087653,0.0011490044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993581,0.0000611095,0.0003247816,0.000040787527,0.00000769304,0.0000056871654,0.000034027715,0.0000031527852,0.00016453418],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999561,0.0001406038,0.000024950943,0.00013556985,0.000086576496,0.000051279858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99508935,0.002160011,0.0017641707,0.0005568474,0.0002346512,0.00019497231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015722323,0.000166503,0.00024116378,0.0003157155,0.0001200902,0.000563159,0.00017822644,0.00041122825,0.001512692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014232866,0.00022629107,0.00015752831,0.00015401113,0.00052155426,0.00074167905,0.00028773688,0.00045328855,0.00014210031],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004150502,0.0009580072,0.7190573,0.00031449687,0.0004841662,0.00058149337,0.0037765258,0.0017544883,0.13680102,0.0016014876,0.0008883775,0.12963225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063429994,0.00045688546,0.98801744,0.00001844162,0.0000906277,0.00026213666,0.0003726749,0.0014657645,0.0061945515,0.0025249678,0.0005094687,0.000023584267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010425886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014834476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0015722323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016001854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015430833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008314908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983309011","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.11.002","title":"Behavioural and neural interactions between objective and subjective performance in a Matching Pennies game","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Optimism; Psychology; Contingency; Matching (statistics); Negativity effect; Social psychology; Contrast (vision); Ultimatum game; Contingency table; Statistics; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.0723373270005191,"score_gpt":0.40489139665151846,"score_spread":0.3325540696509994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983309011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987839,0.000011290529,0.00064391864,0.000036366215,0.00000454564,0.000008083218,0.000027318978,0.0000047159024,0.0004798713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893814,0.000012857142,0.000524923,0.000022104727,0.0000036953074,0.000011970776,0.000034315835,0.000004899625,0.00044711627],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996897,0.00013377807,0.000018445753,0.000059302325,0.00005683492,0.00004190117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976204,0.0015101669,0.00033785478,0.0000882808,0.00007028546,0.0003729792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070828537,0.00023905878,0.00032440588,0.00018852636,0.00013085137,0.00097219745,0.00026994126,0.00048452197,0.0022236598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072697946,0.0003041948,0.000115842435,0.00017150432,0.00035390508,0.00042619306,0.0005042247,0.00062451075,0.00017263574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.021485552,0.005162031,0.22085798,0.00035771535,0.0010688038,0.0006349948,0.0015546385,0.04162448,0.6512942,0.009841715,0.0013295156,0.044788375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030393992,0.0022326359,0.80148834,0.000016165319,0.00012934297,0.00019481225,0.00026841025,0.1823694,0.006534691,0.0061376034,0.00027112043,0.000053521082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013655188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015324084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022236598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024791245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020949243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007438898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984820708","doi":"10.1108/ijse-04-2019-0271","title":"Individual time preferences and obesity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Patience; Obesity; Probit model; Discounting; Time preference; Multivariate probit model; Psychological intervention; Psychology; Population; Demography; Medicine; Social psychology; Environmental health; Economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.07909981303627495,"score_gpt":0.3702086427050974,"score_spread":0.29110882966882246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984820708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928973,0.0014063774,0.001405662,0.00069313543,0.000023578603,0.000018170436,0.0002967442,0.000004610507,0.0032544544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988263,0.0003419766,0.00036183072,0.000045597553,0.000013135816,0.0000071799386,0.00007607913,0.0000010699032,0.00032688526],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958044,0.0002366951,0.000029699298,0.00004749004,0.000061338986,0.00004437548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969292,0.0012780142,0.0012105465,0.00014208027,0.000121957375,0.00031819326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009540061,0.00020801077,0.00015849363,0.0005234575,0.00020115734,0.00073916285,0.00019277098,0.00033561353,0.0032487663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057467828,0.00009944702,0.000476401,0.0005852239,0.0003493685,0.00037832564,0.0003360486,0.0006063146,0.00012653791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004195557,0.0002800062,0.9586959,0.00011721812,0.0003042173,0.00024011993,0.00048341526,0.0029703171,0.0003312423,0.0036022682,0.00042516942,0.03213071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018293524,0.00028223224,0.9823663,0.00006954595,0.00010741247,0.0006032049,0.00078529504,0.0058850753,0.00014170511,0.008362643,0.001354818,0.000023496383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021530308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001726339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032487663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003453457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023222648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010868251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985836649","doi":"10.1007/s11229-019-02431-2","title":"Naturalism, tractability and the adaptive toolbox","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Austrian Science Fund; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Heuristics; Rationality; Computer science; Bounded rationality; Simple (philosophy); Ecological rationality; Normative; Epistemology; Process (computing); Toolbox; Adaptation (eye); Management science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.0791218413362354,"score_gpt":0.3611739249628632,"score_spread":0.2820520836266278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985836649","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07336743,0.00427788,0.64486414,0.017595233,0.00015178944,0.00011478043,0.0005054777,0.00095248345,0.2581709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.937464,0.0010698156,0.052975237,0.0007775766,0.00015820359,0.000232882,0.00030069647,0.00014331088,0.0068782764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718386,0.0017174487,0.00014267713,0.00043415686,0.00037084706,0.00015100639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829375,0.011797161,0.00092079834,0.0035678383,0.00058269803,0.00019403004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005022899,0.00044361706,0.0006388744,0.0013109714,0.0007195049,0.0026822584,0.0011626435,0.0011905341,0.011671654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019132584,0.0002513406,0.0011370238,0.0007683024,0.012811204,0.0038216615,0.0023640099,0.001949225,0.00097655226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008163475,0.000004778901,0.00015964275,0.00004101275,0.000014620019,0.000023064833,0.000044955592,0.007405615,0.0000944399,0.98809415,0.00058823515,0.0035212631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035136895,0.0000025522688,0.00009372284,0.000009538155,0.0000016565567,0.00001275655,0.0000070075403,0.0045564356,0.00004636114,0.9937244,0.0015397085,0.000002206434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011396072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080161745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011671654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022757212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009807013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039045572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989005856","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v8n6p82","title":"Expected Winning Probabilities in Sequential Truels under Uniform Distributions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Conjecture; Sequential estimation; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Statistics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.08631143428977427,"score_gpt":0.38676363064836405,"score_spread":0.3004521963585898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989005856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59361756,0.00016482534,0.394803,0.00077432976,0.00004456602,0.00019673654,0.00041963413,0.0002491277,0.009730187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97462535,0.000094045754,0.02001355,0.00011367529,0.000029139572,0.00022616885,0.00021241998,0.000043451135,0.004642315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475384,0.0021954211,0.00022835899,0.0010031874,0.0008258544,0.000993307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94832134,0.04061828,0.0044340654,0.002966057,0.0017614901,0.0018987126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014620142,0.000597677,0.0012435035,0.0011343661,0.0007302831,0.0023236256,0.0023892883,0.0011968822,0.012641949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057593163,0.00056904973,0.0009850134,0.00066736183,0.003229298,0.0063495836,0.0022375316,0.00198415,0.0012022903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001559073,0.00043667902,0.04148772,0.00037801277,0.00020848132,0.0012011,0.0015233262,0.20596355,0.0036261084,0.67949355,0.004096752,0.06002558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015831618,0.00045540868,0.010324636,0.000054267886,0.00004447501,0.0006199384,0.00066609116,0.509373,0.002526523,0.47448298,0.0011776189,0.00011683081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010258137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086654845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014620142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001492462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010769044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07731962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989553804","doi":"10.1177/0956797619876982","title":"The Sign Effect in Past and Future Discounting","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Booth School of Business, University of Chicago; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Temporal discounting; Sign (mathematics); Discounting; Contemplation; Delay discounting; Phenomenon; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Event (particle physics); Developmental psychology; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.06147263609594121,"score_gpt":0.4436096675196458,"score_spread":0.3821370314237046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989553804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99102074,0.0004916734,0.002890687,0.00015265461,0.000029885088,0.0000116200135,0.00007942854,0.00000936324,0.005313895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989623,0.00014235533,0.0006144651,0.000030057477,0.000014085466,0.0000041026124,0.000039526054,0.0000045344573,0.00018866178],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989236,0.00041004707,0.00010763262,0.00018868867,0.00032348672,0.000046432637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95659757,0.032290485,0.0063397554,0.002580104,0.0012363733,0.0009556901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006235344,0.00016941607,0.00024291349,0.0007127835,0.00017405936,0.0009164381,0.00025524627,0.0002889514,0.0030396034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045592308,0.00019712468,0.0004027537,0.00033969828,0.0008825231,0.0015745605,0.0006971356,0.0008086062,0.00013204059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005367123,0.0004146234,0.8144202,0.00055937184,0.00072728435,0.00039837416,0.003668847,0.0017784846,0.04816411,0.018567413,0.00045809385,0.10547617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003986965,0.0004925062,0.9812656,0.000048869726,0.00021164691,0.00044248946,0.00031786662,0.001633466,0.0051024277,0.009378895,0.0010192336,0.00004711316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003194322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046591935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006235344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021342003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012909055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03297603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990137292","doi":"10.3758/s13421-019-00998-2","title":"Who resists belief-biased inferences? The role of individual differences in reasoning strategies, working memory, and attentional focus","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Working memory; Cognitive psychology; Counterexample; Inference; Cognition; Focus (optics); Task (project management); Causal inference; Fixation (population genetics); Information processing; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Econometrics","score_opus":0.08557412558674711,"score_gpt":0.32896692151889184,"score_spread":0.24339279593214475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990137292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992904,0.00037089703,0.0014992644,0.0014953468,0.000051362735,0.000017464377,0.000032241507,0.000020146226,0.0036092186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99787784,0.00017097719,0.0009549128,0.00048488347,0.000047044385,0.000008548492,0.00003464164,0.000023867344,0.00039731083],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710053,0.0012221488,0.00019711866,0.0005639818,0.0005588174,0.00035745284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93539494,0.040859774,0.012911496,0.006177325,0.0020717075,0.002584732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011385122,0.00029402217,0.0007328853,0.00087026256,0.0004831506,0.00431273,0.0009426241,0.0020322073,0.0027416237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081122085,0.00050854316,0.0003967828,0.00045010677,0.001511651,0.0025537726,0.0007253941,0.0019750409,0.0005242172],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036948167,0.0021451833,0.7960069,0.00024930085,0.0025817861,0.000986097,0.009371978,0.003980852,0.017291514,0.009287793,0.0028721604,0.1515317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005202915,0.0009125223,0.8878525,0.0001634601,0.00078759907,0.0015316278,0.0041709766,0.025086926,0.004872726,0.070480615,0.0034136148,0.00020704085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016422216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017530384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011385122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029299577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006229628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060211003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995194683","doi":"10.1387/theoria.20040","title":"The philosopher’s paradox: How to make a coherent decision in the Newcomb Problem","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Argument (complex analysis); Constraint (computer-aided design); Swing; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Psychology; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.11154307449697283,"score_gpt":0.4157746412767543,"score_spread":0.30423156677978147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995194683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20949559,0.002908976,0.29069307,0.20324078,0.0012375182,0.00023025452,0.00026439072,0.0002512102,0.29167828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481818,0.0005395133,0.03682882,0.004343794,0.0002953863,0.00014084573,0.0000746217,0.00008730178,0.009508058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607533,0.0019702634,0.00019629311,0.00071845116,0.0007029319,0.00033672358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99007493,0.006411507,0.000768266,0.0014276082,0.0006017085,0.00071603706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00910595,0.00046699116,0.0010351903,0.00079600106,0.0030880913,0.00521318,0.0016362696,0.0056812563,0.009682463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026096461,0.0004203191,0.0010831846,0.00081215805,0.012738896,0.016688459,0.0055777775,0.0070536123,0.00091951597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022394079,0.000021674081,0.00013882003,0.000024860785,0.0000110015535,0.00008342402,0.00030929083,0.000810718,0.000082905564,0.9929381,0.0021240509,0.0034327717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002499237,0.0000045928678,0.00006838875,0.00001114927,0.0000028867023,0.00002476576,0.00011008312,0.001780867,0.000053509608,0.99520713,0.0027057768,0.000005777957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022463826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001617864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009682463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017498628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020360132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048157454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996621779","doi":"10.1037/npe0000111","title":"Cognitive reflection but not reinforcement sensitivity is consistently associated with delay discounting of gains and losses.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Narodowym Centrum Nauki","keywords":"Delay discounting; Reinforcement; Psychology; Discounting; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Neuroeconomics; Sensitivity (control systems); Reflection (computer programming); Reinforcement learning; Impulsivity; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Neuroscience; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.16383479029538267,"score_gpt":0.41693965954045126,"score_spread":0.2531048692450686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996621779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972153,0.00028847283,0.0008448928,0.0001448868,0.000024848889,0.00000843759,0.00017218538,0.00002427794,0.00127668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984901,0.00013700253,0.0007632575,0.000061502156,0.000019550927,0.000007179227,0.00016459505,0.000021297266,0.0003355234],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901843,0.0003084147,0.00009770577,0.00027850273,0.00023478016,0.00006229723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9582622,0.017746931,0.017710892,0.0039176773,0.0009979455,0.0013643876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022362268,0.00040835267,0.00045022927,0.0007635302,0.00023830346,0.0012353531,0.00056153064,0.0008590467,0.0024114568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029037222,0.00036274706,0.00035976854,0.00059592316,0.0004327098,0.00039583206,0.00051352265,0.001996082,0.0002852306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003156325,0.00077835785,0.95601857,0.00013837875,0.00067351846,0.00044735114,0.00032339324,0.00042867186,0.017661035,0.00056645996,0.0005071295,0.019300807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017999915,0.00022928671,0.9952276,0.000022908156,0.00010417169,0.0007297245,0.000053570548,0.0007207554,0.0017637698,0.0008988404,0.00021384204,0.000017605817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011783789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010436967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024114568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020282813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030484892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011826456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998901437","doi":"10.1037/xge0000735","title":"Choice protection for feeling-focused decisions.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deliberation; Feeling; PsycINFO; Psychology; Relevance (law); Social psychology; Function (biology); Political science; MEDLINE; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.38881830464056044,"score_gpt":0.4996347150892675,"score_spread":0.11081641044870705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998901437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4651598,0.0012834723,0.08730261,0.008387429,0.00033701136,0.00041439608,0.0002879723,0.00021047688,0.4366168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98706436,0.00013346293,0.008076673,0.0007566211,0.00003638607,0.00014937992,0.000050078634,0.000025125371,0.0037079812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946243,0.0030328957,0.00023033348,0.0008589611,0.00084288005,0.0004105175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96422,0.020020975,0.0058764103,0.0069878334,0.0010439422,0.0018508942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009161282,0.00034645354,0.00024726847,0.0004725433,0.0009380816,0.0025153165,0.00058382744,0.0014418771,0.031182243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049216513,0.00021552609,0.0005621784,0.00036847583,0.0051414743,0.0036930882,0.0031809004,0.0025666384,0.0015966304],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001017171,0.00075365254,0.029581264,0.00073660153,0.0001767128,0.00043059257,0.015116503,0.0009168452,0.009647782,0.744239,0.004060257,0.19332369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034775757,0.0014728698,0.14065091,0.0008506304,0.00018489374,0.0011685132,0.007246747,0.0038971433,0.009973247,0.7651077,0.06897375,0.00012584403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024514899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038841643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031182243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007104791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008858741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10431492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999977105","doi":"10.3758/s13421-019-00992-8","title":"Concreteness and disagreement: Comment on Pollock (2018)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Concreteness; Psychology; Word (group theory); Cognitive psychology; Memory test; Linguistics; Cognition; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1887207672372673,"score_gpt":0.36590007622552084,"score_spread":0.17717930898825354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999977105","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020455002,0.0006549504,0.00006226251,0.9845797,0.012670302,0.000007941763,0.00006345754,0.000014065564,0.0017428088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012828094,0.00017170972,0.000043579203,0.9853402,0.010042798,0.000022583035,0.0000125546285,0.000015057913,0.0030687426],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98535764,0.0028714233,0.0016225075,0.0030087638,0.003982822,0.0031567528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9470812,0.037016507,0.0027920115,0.0015337211,0.007886702,0.0036898581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01405224,0.001573769,0.003468979,0.001779206,0.01581281,0.014280934,0.006652,0.16847646,0.017338969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09424879,0.0019507711,0.0027969875,0.0025258618,0.013701168,0.012054325,0.0076640067,0.112694,0.0147871375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045473065,0.000011566259,0.0002491311,0.000040927298,0.000012105081,0.00027786038,0.00061776134,0.000028104361,0.000056085486,0.0060385545,0.9907759,0.0018466718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015251029,0.00003822875,0.0022746006,0.00076447957,0.00007035536,0.00044513732,0.0028225735,0.00037495853,0.00037428775,0.027336711,0.965138,0.00020816381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062924944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.081936255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16847646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012058049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016627114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12511736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000569177","doi":"10.3917/reco.706.1095","title":"Holt and Laury measures and insurance decisions: A same risk attitude?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue économique","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12318179305201335,"score_gpt":0.3339207375444069,"score_spread":0.21073894449239353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000569177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9281711,0.0013984862,0.029235795,0.006087817,0.00022287841,0.00025304253,0.0002775582,0.000047244303,0.03430611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898747,0.0005087625,0.0044003846,0.0005831169,0.00014078831,0.00009515273,0.000120465134,0.000014019523,0.004262624],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966336,0.0017791844,0.00019989157,0.00029897218,0.00092529954,0.00016315625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9557075,0.032498617,0.0073938444,0.0022233825,0.0013763334,0.0008002474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068590175,0.00037526575,0.00048352446,0.001084138,0.00057869044,0.002471926,0.00043119251,0.0013176491,0.011980397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047429945,0.00016341187,0.0008942961,0.0010861984,0.001929753,0.002201954,0.0011166135,0.0020453404,0.0007811118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001749922,0.0012565504,0.61930805,0.00052927196,0.0008602976,0.00042459526,0.0094603235,0.0073122852,0.0025850127,0.138376,0.0061735404,0.21196426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019624727,0.001634012,0.8156453,0.00027235012,0.00040424813,0.00036617936,0.0048094573,0.024507727,0.0023573164,0.13950117,0.0101765245,0.00012955946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027125555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023492589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011980397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012489675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005513747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0400784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002706339","doi":"10.1177/0022243719889336","title":"Inaction Traps in Consumer Response to Product Malfunctions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Consumption (sociology); Phenomenon; Vulnerability (computing); Action (physics); Psychological intervention; Trap (plumbing); Business; Downstream (manufacturing); Risk analysis (engineering); Marketing; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Computer science; Computer security; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.46715446509705577,"score_gpt":0.5296060164812807,"score_spread":0.062451551384224924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002706339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98881406,0.000099346624,0.004420038,0.000372625,0.000008533767,0.00008248197,0.000023254663,0.000026365187,0.0061534103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984799,0.00003370263,0.0010423769,0.00011132676,0.0000028322688,0.00002645357,0.0000140265065,0.0000030760061,0.0002862298],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980597,0.00097463315,0.0001015654,0.00023124523,0.00046706048,0.00016570523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682704,0.019259201,0.008909165,0.0016599658,0.001298033,0.0006030465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003732678,0.0003529731,0.00032937116,0.00075682,0.0005719624,0.0019011345,0.00056263077,0.0012128656,0.0033101772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026986172,0.00030570777,0.0004859961,0.00033400653,0.0017932524,0.002160884,0.0015092159,0.0017606097,0.0002654886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005461243,0.006379167,0.7210062,0.0007191317,0.00032805992,0.0011752368,0.0363805,0.015814021,0.024176685,0.0510969,0.0020383182,0.13542457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042038038,0.007836072,0.7373556,0.00027830343,0.00032687996,0.0010586372,0.031714294,0.11337235,0.01384731,0.08645295,0.007046438,0.00029070975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015609219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009563458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003732678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011652379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007321767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019740522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002990142","doi":"10.1007/s11747-019-00717-y","title":"How and when weather boosts consumer product valuation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Snow; Product (mathematics); Business; Marketing; Rain and snow mixed; Environmental science; Meteorology; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.17974607830450076,"score_gpt":0.382949906566836,"score_spread":0.2032038282623352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002990142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98135746,0.0006131939,0.0009888683,0.0011701745,0.00018836587,0.000009838325,0.00010911953,0.0000307471,0.015532261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982712,0.00020108648,0.00017498228,0.00013420143,0.00007049919,0.0000021054398,0.000042652606,0.000010135734,0.0010931616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975044,0.00008191285,0.000012042654,0.000045809455,0.000051678835,0.00005810485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980763,0.0011763996,0.0002722424,0.00015202886,0.00013142743,0.00019155542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005866686,0.00015562699,0.0002223218,0.0002011656,0.00023820627,0.0017531018,0.00014270986,0.00079055084,0.0067394525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005407315,0.00019438192,0.0003144913,0.00024054974,0.0004104389,0.0014805843,0.0003279524,0.000635683,0.00060876424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00944284,0.0028870835,0.5015966,0.00069653895,0.0010300438,0.0012374315,0.0013360558,0.033511028,0.13033278,0.042381264,0.016974088,0.25857428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025218487,0.00066723983,0.87988156,0.00005995539,0.00053190964,0.00030417735,0.0016806866,0.02438371,0.010694419,0.06885739,0.012593771,0.000093058516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002917267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033876237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067394525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047096916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024095581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022545755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004966899","doi":"10.1007/s11109-020-09594-6","title":"Politicians, the Representativeness Heuristic and Decision-Making Biases","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Behavior","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; Heuristics; Heuristic; Neglect; Scope (computer science); Psychology; Sample (material); Satisficing; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Conjunction (astronomy); Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.26202033913744394,"score_gpt":0.47144519947287805,"score_spread":0.20942486033543412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004966899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805777,0.0002140608,0.005328898,0.00064101955,0.000023079994,0.000049226193,0.000024966826,0.000010089175,0.013131029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99845636,0.000053995514,0.001184738,0.00008682824,0.000008724363,0.00002034836,0.000010774568,0.0000038616995,0.00017441605],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835159,0.011935116,0.00077250093,0.0009441152,0.0022324466,0.0005998432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8332211,0.13572034,0.019722577,0.006139941,0.0035478598,0.0016481783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02178145,0.00029107687,0.0005077498,0.00093847275,0.00089396595,0.0033873518,0.00045541316,0.0011625356,0.0034626634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.101641186,0.00035011867,0.00023548875,0.00076144224,0.0034628804,0.0026723528,0.001488853,0.0012645947,0.0002475846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005515591,0.0020111739,0.5454942,0.0013828641,0.00069492846,0.000859437,0.060304604,0.011628302,0.021053327,0.14776401,0.0034154986,0.19987604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077924505,0.001807126,0.56842744,0.0007889823,0.0004529381,0.00077006896,0.0458303,0.04192846,0.014211144,0.30619723,0.018421944,0.00038514516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009709525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011577482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02178145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009768821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085233967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11519265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005615619","doi":"10.3758/s13423-020-01710-1","title":"The environmental malleability of base-rate neglect","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Malleability; Neglect; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Base (topology); Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.13328186434606845,"score_gpt":0.36730057399042587,"score_spread":0.23401870964435742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005615619","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15796624,0.7483699,0.01895969,0.022970632,0.0016011855,0.00006830503,0.00037659134,0.00011522434,0.049572296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74801075,0.24217543,0.0021054025,0.004154028,0.001729402,0.000040711977,0.00013138252,0.000035009536,0.0016178807],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923015,0.00020927897,0.00008211896,0.00014896835,0.00024595181,0.00008354072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98872477,0.0077856625,0.0018977991,0.00058566337,0.00080756284,0.00019854697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024208897,0.00023272654,0.0005025472,0.0009038597,0.00021523346,0.0013673818,0.00065534277,0.0008402162,0.0032821812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017471429,0.0001621274,0.00044405137,0.0008079188,0.0023918436,0.0017316691,0.000878019,0.0012712677,0.0002856429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012110671,0.000113504524,0.028079635,0.0034980418,0.0007720254,0.0008776819,0.0003518185,0.0014023505,0.004425149,0.06284576,0.006262173,0.89016086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028843642,0.000991391,0.33566058,0.008018541,0.002204779,0.012714426,0.0012084562,0.00310489,0.014602822,0.41993582,0.20106788,0.00020202082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009052986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067713455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032821812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006654384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007932898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012803018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006494287","doi":"10.5964/ejop.v16i2.1958","title":"Influences of complexity on decision making in young and older adults","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Europe’s Journal of Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Trent University; Nottingham Trent University","keywords":"Psychology; Medical decision making; Clinical decision making; Social psychology; Gerontology; Medicine; Family medicine","score_opus":0.2053550059401138,"score_gpt":0.4640934967058229,"score_spread":0.2587384907657091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006494287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99835473,0.0002204334,0.00008480524,0.000066053944,0.0000055427045,0.000009213579,0.00003297295,0.0000017696298,0.0012243696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994178,0.00010512804,0.00016366276,0.000034365894,0.000011794848,0.000005504224,0.00003888848,0.0000017231652,0.00022109933],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937254,0.0001801894,0.00009021046,0.00008018848,0.0001977501,0.00007919669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99260545,0.004070803,0.0016025782,0.00024448344,0.00043850837,0.0010381329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016442202,0.00024626407,0.0003197156,0.0006083162,0.0002968065,0.0013400874,0.00011115742,0.00044101532,0.0026872964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014281223,0.00018487127,0.000322066,0.0001901468,0.0004029461,0.0006240752,0.000709831,0.0004968236,0.00023814857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005716275,0.0008530723,0.9271811,0.00014859042,0.0002920997,0.0007498246,0.0114099225,0.00095714023,0.009161588,0.0010891132,0.0006167666,0.041824576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008663399,0.0009581007,0.99017674,0.000042954303,0.00008710985,0.00044736927,0.0016684644,0.0015943679,0.000808455,0.0029775011,0.0011153976,0.000036920395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023608543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033359667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026872964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035925716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027406716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00898993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008359594","doi":"10.1111/risa.13443","title":"Improving Probability Judgment in Intelligence Analysis: From Structured Analysis to Statistical Aggregation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Analysis","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Bayes' theorem; Intelligence analysis; Computer science; Contrast (vision); Range (aeronautics); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Value (mathematics); Machine learning; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Bayesian probability; Psychology; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.09332863880444729,"score_gpt":0.37436152319975663,"score_spread":0.2810328843953093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008359594","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17821194,0.0008093772,0.8005698,0.0034902494,0.00023107485,0.0015486743,0.00012236719,0.0009993307,0.014017163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41563252,0.00027746873,0.5820673,0.00068111747,0.000120708726,0.0006418439,0.00007385359,0.00011538799,0.00038984214],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9171075,0.06547316,0.0027337098,0.0038694767,0.01004204,0.0007740644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5869268,0.3555463,0.014045254,0.031009674,0.0107997935,0.0016722147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07545818,0.0013468971,0.0017042618,0.0027845984,0.0016875386,0.0051582693,0.0018521122,0.0015517473,0.0028244173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3017863,0.0009409537,0.0013682129,0.0027231225,0.005060481,0.012683733,0.007165261,0.004434879,0.00048915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020030402,0.001387523,0.020189678,0.0011381909,0.0005046197,0.00014895214,0.012971274,0.029772814,0.0069145164,0.14130253,0.0055013336,0.7781656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008114736,0.003014792,0.022075804,0.00059965247,0.00048586304,0.00024513298,0.0024435318,0.3855612,0.011799026,0.5625261,0.010064485,0.00037290694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014973718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001856642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07545818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022204544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027894261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39906573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008917289","doi":"10.3758/s13421-020-01027-3","title":"Reasoning strategies and semantic memory effects in deductive reasoning","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Probabilistic logic; Deductive reasoning; Cognitive psychology; Counterexample; Logical reasoning; Statement (logic); Dual (grammatical number); Inductive reasoning; Relation (database); Verbal reasoning; Cognition; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0803756863639596,"score_gpt":0.3550247915525798,"score_spread":0.27464910518862024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008917289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766867,0.0006803428,0.0060610315,0.0006041572,0.00017752103,0.0001033625,0.00025861172,0.00013544156,0.015292904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99142003,0.00041646653,0.0037730096,0.00036268053,0.00022284684,0.00011482961,0.0004749994,0.00027347886,0.0029416191],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971047,0.0009345435,0.00032138586,0.00067570683,0.00070399186,0.00025960285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87653196,0.10565992,0.007327498,0.0057648183,0.0025436236,0.0021721406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007128138,0.0013194054,0.0012398479,0.0016034257,0.00055913476,0.0061193523,0.0023758204,0.0027821672,0.01931271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09405984,0.0014753395,0.0011000942,0.0009382728,0.0021972216,0.014766262,0.0029280584,0.0034106667,0.0018717902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10072171,0.018741205,0.11686706,0.004423585,0.0027287009,0.0027611912,0.016853716,0.025588578,0.2901122,0.0991654,0.0063994015,0.3156372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010915179,0.009756095,0.3112304,0.0005924007,0.0040573822,0.0034760477,0.0036860975,0.07759227,0.06665723,0.50528306,0.006076919,0.00067682104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009052701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049504096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01931271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007400386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007662825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06460744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010781033","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2020.105027","title":"Bayes and Hurwicz without Bernoulli","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Université Grenoble Alpes","keywords":"Ambiguity; Bernoulli's principle; Expected utility hypothesis; Certainty; Bayes' theorem; Subjective expected utility; Mathematical economics; Decision theory; Decision maker; Ambiguity aversion; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematics; Computer science; Bayesian inference; Bayesian probability; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Statistics","score_opus":0.14432492021204477,"score_gpt":0.3975724710055006,"score_spread":0.25324755079345584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010781033","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06503299,0.016103081,0.79948515,0.02526082,0.0023997878,0.00014475477,0.0006312386,0.00024032874,0.09070191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7257408,0.0129461,0.17329296,0.0028259843,0.004991321,0.00029037378,0.00041397644,0.00021265341,0.07928586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963921,0.0016430711,0.00021655954,0.0004996648,0.00094431674,0.00030431637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743713,0.020524368,0.00096253963,0.0019477,0.0017709825,0.00042302354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008802689,0.0012849235,0.002645227,0.0026038191,0.0013642359,0.004095749,0.0020620811,0.0032653906,0.008048511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051915973,0.0014104987,0.0011182241,0.0023535006,0.005067499,0.010545109,0.0020531865,0.0038090474,0.0016116541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015480153,0.000009744168,0.0001565899,0.000033399076,0.000014365942,0.000029425908,0.00004427432,0.0029045905,0.000042370397,0.9890821,0.0014369951,0.0062305173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005001836,0.0000021932449,0.000060802948,0.000011001905,0.000005787106,0.000022648212,0.0000053057734,0.0100623835,0.00002985578,0.98891556,0.0008721137,0.0000072826133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037255224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029198464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008802689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021696575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020530215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04655361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013191290","doi":"","title":"Rationality, intelligence, and the defining features of Type 1 and Type 2 processing.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Computer science; Type (biology); Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1250586006194288,"score_gpt":0.4034161849257864,"score_spread":0.2783575843063576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013191290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62413687,0.0071766796,0.15923658,0.012957809,0.00037582568,0.00022549194,0.00058722124,0.0001207956,0.1951828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98658866,0.0005719482,0.010977395,0.00039639533,0.00008830709,0.00008969764,0.00007968209,0.0000112718735,0.0011967131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966794,0.0017126546,0.00022736761,0.0004488745,0.0005884195,0.0003432608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983723,0.010626699,0.0024236047,0.0017778737,0.0008340113,0.0006148103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040578377,0.0004710486,0.00057944877,0.0011374815,0.00061495526,0.003904219,0.0006213881,0.001461897,0.0037391842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023599349,0.00031386112,0.00067457417,0.00070747075,0.0053351955,0.0034027419,0.0013613462,0.0014678073,0.00028624784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021485383,0.00008609071,0.011459275,0.00012878174,0.000095241034,0.0001326197,0.00059665344,0.002805898,0.00072614243,0.9528357,0.0011833432,0.029735377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019650775,0.00002925992,0.0063908934,0.000028303648,0.000020119582,0.00010458154,0.0001634389,0.0034783753,0.00027409004,0.98851097,0.00096457195,0.000015790174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010618238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076297636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040578377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009804416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009585398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021460176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014392388","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v12n4p95","title":"A Risk-Neutral Consumer and His Coherent Decisions Under Uncertainty: A Methodological Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Subjective expected utility; Univariate; Consumption (sociology); Econometrics; Function (biology); Space (punctuation); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Multivariate statistics; Statistics","score_opus":0.29934730982684754,"score_gpt":0.4274971682218672,"score_spread":0.12814985839501963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014392388","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08211141,0.0026997242,0.8863063,0.008248556,0.0000862087,0.00007615107,0.00009582961,0.000018820403,0.020356983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.836526,0.0023856745,0.15507878,0.00053548045,0.00026833566,0.0002606373,0.00006887836,0.000021012242,0.004855226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963766,0.0026032021,0.00009302318,0.00039737305,0.00035660347,0.00017332887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938066,0.004703623,0.00064052804,0.00030112098,0.00034770547,0.0002003711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063278843,0.0005770436,0.00082591793,0.0012238538,0.0009656344,0.0033247136,0.0013001782,0.0021168455,0.0023030634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010984726,0.00045276515,0.0010083354,0.0014898926,0.0040472797,0.00614822,0.0021587147,0.0022441212,0.00022351781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010988095,0.000022812437,0.0004169986,0.00003216597,0.000019091869,0.00007001507,0.00023737464,0.0066862144,0.00015038373,0.98913157,0.00017415978,0.0030483506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010731513,0.000041979605,0.00027946252,0.000041017436,0.000019987194,0.00006448605,0.00022571406,0.041581597,0.00015187608,0.9552379,0.0023267276,0.000018518906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011625317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068938127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063278843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023301768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010783626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033465445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014622127","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2179","title":"How representations of number and numeracy predict decision paradoxes: A fuzzy‐trace theory approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Nursing Research; Savoy Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Numeracy; Categorical variable; GiST; Psychology; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology; Ordinal data; Statistics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12275054784696351,"score_gpt":0.420808850625137,"score_spread":0.29805830277817347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014622127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96015,0.0000783925,0.03410518,0.0007191742,0.00001612087,0.00004199651,0.00006325791,0.00003535557,0.004790411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99710387,0.000015150409,0.0026694506,0.00002980493,0.0000036775211,0.000012165177,0.0000188384,0.0000037317768,0.00014327146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814427,0.00094243494,0.000078975885,0.0002304243,0.0005010425,0.00010281446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97300684,0.019182911,0.0030266433,0.0021693269,0.0017200962,0.0008941635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052373484,0.0003443921,0.00046818165,0.0017457571,0.00041150276,0.0029922314,0.0009444445,0.00069858815,0.0036193237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056008983,0.0003561998,0.0005924572,0.00069138437,0.002393658,0.003866927,0.0017630744,0.0012983469,0.00016642363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001965316,0.0014635467,0.5858416,0.0003797551,0.0006640382,0.00058633526,0.011457582,0.054620273,0.012918675,0.20324428,0.0019322854,0.12492643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001085889,0.00038822336,0.14298928,0.00006172911,0.00010858942,0.0002952297,0.0017451376,0.35615173,0.0030396495,0.49416697,0.0008311152,0.00011376905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030193932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016132802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052373484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082440354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007983944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0276981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016133661","doi":"","title":"Testing the Effect of Incentives on Effort Intensity Using Real-Effort Tasks","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Incentive; Computer science; Test (biology); Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Engineering; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.08534902525797174,"score_gpt":0.3868727462288363,"score_spread":0.30152372097086455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016133661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908125,0.000030009454,0.0072616413,0.000041823358,0.000014904658,0.00025640667,0.00008159727,0.000030423835,0.0014706515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797799,0.00003820544,0.017446404,0.00009010234,0.000024628873,0.001284445,0.00020147536,0.000028413322,0.0011064623],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475783,0.0027347647,0.0006577722,0.000654567,0.0008544294,0.00034066534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8648151,0.10945517,0.013191879,0.008701685,0.0019041013,0.001931962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078120697,0.00093030237,0.0006100903,0.0004407134,0.000370406,0.0014025251,0.00094664854,0.0010314697,0.0028553663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06720607,0.0004991562,0.00047332453,0.00032073187,0.00065190945,0.0014680262,0.001393408,0.0009517686,0.00044657858],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.044067897,0.059228025,0.38401902,0.0023346348,0.0013053743,0.0004538298,0.0064050145,0.038364407,0.27020785,0.0115075195,0.0016642006,0.18044235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017723076,0.03718537,0.86064535,0.00013103712,0.00028060836,0.00020343447,0.0005035606,0.04598824,0.042419787,0.007961611,0.002700783,0.00020795452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003434031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033845552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078120697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035445445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000454296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04131466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016939514","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1169","title":"Impatience and Savoring vs. Dread: Asymmetries in Anticipation Explain Consumer Time Preferences for Positive vs. Negative Events","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Feeling; Psychology; Social psychology; Negative emotion; Negative information; Event (particle physics); Motivated reasoning","score_opus":0.16149951328275258,"score_gpt":0.4368891220080851,"score_spread":0.2753896087253325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016939514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99203753,0.0003177797,0.0012781033,0.00028058243,0.0000070595815,0.000019364436,0.000036881742,0.0000029032929,0.006019835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991448,0.0000834265,0.00040969576,0.00006851458,0.0000062889094,0.000010275662,0.000030037892,0.000002330241,0.00024449843],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995542,0.00023838559,0.000031589767,0.000060164086,0.00006945221,0.000046185265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97619927,0.019210681,0.0027388274,0.001012019,0.00045014988,0.0003890775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029146604,0.00024755695,0.00019080572,0.00050010794,0.0003620581,0.0017664833,0.00027271124,0.0008479717,0.006896127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014953307,0.00020403227,0.00062773225,0.0003383389,0.0008001202,0.0013969603,0.00066251116,0.0011033451,0.00018656203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045583416,0.0015332861,0.84488773,0.0007183516,0.00057263364,0.000661704,0.014618075,0.002397674,0.014183561,0.02302278,0.00087032706,0.0919755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013148627,0.00038868174,0.96821636,0.00011488185,0.00042665467,0.00023181687,0.0050498433,0.0044009658,0.0025246856,0.016430542,0.0020243207,0.00005964142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019213468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002862104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006896127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049092056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027505244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023069859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017877307","doi":"10.1016/s2468-2667(20)30096-7","title":"Pitfalls of judgment during the COVID-19 pandemic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Lancet Public Health","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Isolation (microbiology); Social distance; Blame; Pandemic; Neglect; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Social isolation; Coping (psychology); Mental health; Psychological resilience; Social psychology; Medicine; Disease; Psychiatry; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.7439463160865961,"score_gpt":0.5579711582968446,"score_spread":0.1859751577897515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017877307","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058419157,0.01957728,0.016307745,0.8244496,0.012851874,0.00011589161,0.00019198991,0.00022369775,0.06786283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80608106,0.014282246,0.0061702486,0.15822192,0.0065954127,0.0001472984,0.00008774811,0.00019497478,0.008219211],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9653747,0.022610297,0.0016318436,0.0017645411,0.0064986353,0.0021198962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9360775,0.041385327,0.006744711,0.003620586,0.009396815,0.0027751075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02197264,0.00053210376,0.0005970547,0.0009910535,0.0055656694,0.005923163,0.0026096622,0.006251435,0.0045740986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086108066,0.0004413278,0.0010964125,0.0007882125,0.02480502,0.010290156,0.004834783,0.01511115,0.0013911077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038810298,0.00020442561,0.015345438,0.0017486542,0.00014946102,0.003808224,0.25888819,0.00049888686,0.0017731417,0.15717861,0.2975577,0.26245916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070547525,0.00033126015,0.017523099,0.003918027,0.000096254946,0.004941841,0.20085898,0.0012000338,0.002030558,0.17813529,0.5905986,0.00029549506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011897004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015878582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02197264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006246295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062445984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116203845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021630820","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12669","title":"The Sequential Dominance Argument for the Independence Axiom of Expected Utility Theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Axiom independence; Expected utility hypothesis; Lottery; Mathematical economics; Independence (probability theory); Axiom; Argument (complex analysis); Irrational number; Subjective expected utility; Economics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Microeconomics; Statistics","score_opus":0.6169989946602398,"score_gpt":0.5031804853143231,"score_spread":0.11381850934591664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021630820","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04472916,0.0010037007,0.6766519,0.014590559,0.00032787368,0.00013409171,0.0003414773,0.00011378393,0.2621075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8592031,0.0010098876,0.110478744,0.0028861808,0.0007674431,0.0003915313,0.00028867892,0.000113652015,0.024860747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99227,0.0030374285,0.00034374162,0.00079254725,0.0029415365,0.0006146363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853114,0.010094692,0.0007378778,0.0013128457,0.0019481803,0.0005950382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008376132,0.00072549056,0.0009377317,0.0011636596,0.002062298,0.0028171383,0.0013883137,0.0017219211,0.012152504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017816076,0.0005777571,0.0016931124,0.0011227352,0.0058847945,0.0071031847,0.0033401628,0.004991076,0.0013141487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017953264,0.00001727372,0.00014879942,0.000022189079,0.000013729873,0.000032983968,0.000105240935,0.0010748456,0.00016519673,0.9942352,0.0010449671,0.0031216387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021969681,0.000014021602,0.00014674453,0.000014536064,0.000009393874,0.000033248452,0.000026078174,0.004959225,0.00018686058,0.99056727,0.004013907,0.000006702387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018887357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019541124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012152504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026751678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023116693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044297755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021978697","doi":"10.3390/jrfm13050094","title":"The Investment Home Bias with Peer Effect","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bivariate analysis; Stochastic dominance; Economics; Econometrics; Stock (firearms); Diversification (marketing strategy); Financial economics; Microeconomics; Statistics; Mathematics; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.05968589283086834,"score_gpt":0.31166066427726685,"score_spread":0.2519747714463985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021978697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86769736,0.0005179238,0.06435242,0.0024465295,0.00009525037,0.00009379503,0.00015339951,0.000083940715,0.06455928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673355,0.000092401926,0.0010376864,0.00017700045,0.000055224566,0.00001035075,0.00001198843,0.0000044956355,0.0018773897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990545,0.00030827086,0.000036298163,0.00023641491,0.00021237234,0.0001521503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935674,0.0025897033,0.0016975511,0.0011684346,0.00055896497,0.00041806375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002153247,0.00019647092,0.0004483079,0.00034218986,0.00034775533,0.0008094515,0.0003719103,0.0007613777,0.007422465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012031722,0.00011935146,0.00028344928,0.00026517187,0.00141423,0.001190135,0.0008991585,0.0007622307,0.00039641815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005725791,0.00019568202,0.12789644,0.00023455746,0.00026282042,0.0013489723,0.0012489794,0.009239431,0.010521318,0.76012397,0.0058738324,0.08248144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021518925,0.00051369215,0.14206775,0.00008956336,0.00030013573,0.0017589955,0.0015632593,0.060438324,0.0075682467,0.7733071,0.012075204,0.000102633305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010570196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008554636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007422465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044558014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024377543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02483064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023839572","doi":"","title":"Analogy in Decision-Making","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Representation (politics); Analogical reasoning; Variety (cybernetics); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Decision problem; Artificial intelligence; Identification (biology); Management science; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Epistemology; Algorithm; Economics","score_opus":0.02269561806832284,"score_gpt":0.26658985585797135,"score_spread":0.2438942377896485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023839572","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046997353,0.012356174,0.69890976,0.015437326,0.0006452405,0.00026059532,0.00025076675,0.00012715055,0.22501564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88118446,0.0028928763,0.10645338,0.0009778679,0.00040506112,0.0003742846,0.00014234627,0.000031614243,0.007538125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883625,0.008234762,0.0004349014,0.0010908642,0.00151452,0.0003625067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886359,0.008734995,0.00066761975,0.00096720457,0.0006400854,0.00035417505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007965419,0.00091509614,0.0010503833,0.0018577166,0.001495399,0.0047742776,0.0014444422,0.0025614277,0.0099335285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018288363,0.00043166216,0.0011247451,0.0024311591,0.011366579,0.007907089,0.0030498595,0.003544305,0.00070994336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074932827,0.000009053325,0.00006999394,0.00004302766,0.000011354515,0.000024826806,0.000114650946,0.0032580737,0.000032699274,0.99245995,0.00028549292,0.0036833708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061858764,0.0000052874943,0.00003362069,0.000016796332,0.0000027128517,0.000013144874,0.000028656063,0.0037734306,0.000022016418,0.99445975,0.0016356058,0.000002700544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015150678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011911761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0099335285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039921664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017214622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042125642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026585542","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.05.004","title":"Comparative infinite lottery logic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Cardinality (data modeling); Mathematical economics; Independence (probability theory); Mathematics; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Premise; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6226844429419854,"score_gpt":0.4611620035654826,"score_spread":0.16152243937650285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026585542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0697555,0.00916032,0.3279486,0.020434545,0.00046448657,0.00006770971,0.00034415288,0.00022510275,0.5715995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91564417,0.002309919,0.03754672,0.002066234,0.0007231983,0.00017137833,0.00025785246,0.00010735101,0.04117321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951708,0.0032442429,0.00014569376,0.00049802253,0.00069128745,0.00025001462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97931564,0.017222438,0.00047443778,0.0014715637,0.0009907715,0.0005251467],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068942104,0.0007027294,0.0011171002,0.0018602668,0.0023214677,0.004453292,0.0019007454,0.0025598016,0.018468816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018029315,0.00054379116,0.001271272,0.0016327548,0.0085315,0.0104904175,0.0025070095,0.0044550914,0.0009323206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000763834,0.0000071105546,0.000024923873,0.000009544566,0.0000036569133,0.0000038658386,0.000029451023,0.00036299278,0.00001329415,0.99794346,0.00032011632,0.0012739615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004782459,0.000003241716,0.000027188282,0.0000056906747,0.0000019713088,0.000006152911,0.0000073275496,0.0008042768,0.000016310874,0.99806446,0.0010563865,0.0000021739893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012495993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012035358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004715844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018429698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061784387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036829954","doi":"10.1027/1864-9335/a000418","title":"Reducing the Halo Effect by Stimulating Analytic Thinking","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Halo effect; Halo; Priming (agriculture); Task (project management); Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Trait; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.18972567176674784,"score_gpt":0.48494810859023607,"score_spread":0.29522243682348825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036829954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843837,0.00044886384,0.011292743,0.00019238073,0.00007934116,0.00007156305,0.000025497766,0.00019318158,0.0033126972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916164,0.00018014527,0.007367647,0.00011178287,0.000051507697,0.000052768508,0.000021217524,0.00004727374,0.00055124005],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994837,0.00020072742,0.000039412575,0.00007832485,0.00013900692,0.000058766578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956008,0.0025036107,0.00065415155,0.0005275283,0.00028975523,0.00042412593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088483695,0.00042680535,0.00029582452,0.0002764171,0.00020938896,0.0006383121,0.00025637672,0.00036925648,0.003130736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041879653,0.0001976396,0.00022833115,0.00012882285,0.00047173636,0.00048515468,0.0007305344,0.00068792066,0.00036084006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022717924,0.00075063657,0.002460569,0.00034377186,0.000047517464,0.00010334757,0.00046085365,0.00022230193,0.9629381,0.0015319616,0.00032207242,0.028546974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077724236,0.011152552,0.050568774,0.00016003306,0.00028371392,0.00077140785,0.0004640914,0.0049780644,0.9152161,0.009987745,0.0055567035,0.00008364498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000083035746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008745587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003130736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010019433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023695336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010473371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037507981","doi":"10.1037/cep0000209","title":"When “bad” is good: How evaluative judgments eliminate the standard anchoring effect.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Anchoring; Psychology; PsycINFO; Priming (agriculture); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Experimental psychology; Cognition; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.1583104538575124,"score_gpt":0.4096731112367655,"score_spread":0.25136265737925306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037507981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8495839,0.0015438818,0.06028296,0.003988882,0.0003530159,0.00013457586,0.00033167395,0.0004359333,0.0833451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853064,0.00024958444,0.012798201,0.00036628995,0.00003328459,0.000039599134,0.00008640556,0.00009165986,0.0010286223],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99479383,0.0022654627,0.00030293883,0.0009829798,0.0014443971,0.0002102703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9486668,0.032170832,0.009615048,0.0056809667,0.0027954017,0.0010710005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008948314,0.00038569112,0.0003820349,0.0011196017,0.0006166785,0.0032388929,0.0005842928,0.00090978167,0.004280456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08715857,0.00043672783,0.0003045982,0.000886154,0.0032164904,0.006441217,0.0018263785,0.0015395677,0.0006318956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00341446,0.00061199017,0.08630211,0.001184892,0.00043970745,0.0004811011,0.025448583,0.0026420064,0.091704585,0.18605922,0.008909161,0.59280217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030339963,0.00095525396,0.3525465,0.0005995237,0.00041391657,0.0008296728,0.008372066,0.015928224,0.04868542,0.53434515,0.03671873,0.00030204593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015450639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021178457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008948314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007061906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087781495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047323763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038075178","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v34i09.7122","title":"The St. Petersburg Paradox: A Fresh Algorithmic Perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Normative; Lottery; Expected utility hypothesis; Valuation (finance); Cognition; Epistemology; Stochastic game; Computer science; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.26155700513411934,"score_gpt":0.40065885441190724,"score_spread":0.1391018492777879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038075178","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046633504,0.012472548,0.7226562,0.08481484,0.0012221535,0.00012258154,0.0005546392,0.0002575318,0.13126607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73081475,0.008431254,0.23289555,0.006211663,0.0026774122,0.0003004824,0.0004225077,0.000254827,0.017991541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975829,0.001050302,0.00011999784,0.00051678275,0.0005930783,0.0001369688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905888,0.007251643,0.0004718806,0.00092138303,0.00052257837,0.00024380343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050407844,0.0010116445,0.001275563,0.0022508532,0.0017057259,0.006133992,0.0024526734,0.0034953377,0.0089892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021457803,0.0006211572,0.0015165312,0.0021523414,0.010146371,0.017593302,0.0035628122,0.007277004,0.0010112167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058348746,0.000005709742,0.0000754915,0.000023527016,0.0000050307103,0.000018946308,0.00006463606,0.0011284258,0.000046145793,0.9947068,0.0007407247,0.0031787853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035355868,0.0000023624025,0.000030989217,0.000009370897,0.0000018937883,0.000016714064,0.000017636305,0.0027185164,0.000027987455,0.9950647,0.0021026046,0.000003709389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013437785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012745715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0089892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002086133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018192892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030071795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040193520","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104381","title":"The smart intuitor: Cognitive capacity predicts intuitive rather than deliberate thinking","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive load; Intuition; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.1931658009798375,"score_gpt":0.3593794691454466,"score_spread":0.16621366816560912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040193520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9795068,0.00014921953,0.009237513,0.0009592536,0.00004309642,0.00002882871,0.0002480375,0.000091557275,0.00973578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975866,0.000051106577,0.0016500741,0.0000834356,0.000022578706,0.000023171484,0.000090811096,0.000031392454,0.00046084597],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993782,0.00022083454,0.000029832601,0.0001689605,0.00012076928,0.000081368584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9616906,0.02841702,0.004055555,0.003298596,0.00090667466,0.0016314728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027023286,0.0005290514,0.00052495947,0.0009776517,0.0003256413,0.0027319137,0.000543079,0.0013341138,0.008907266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035331707,0.00044421415,0.00058727764,0.00055722665,0.0016631673,0.0045452616,0.0016794214,0.0016533541,0.000823057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0055891834,0.0012559625,0.6741454,0.00045381617,0.0007340484,0.0007879869,0.0024888867,0.031361114,0.014749353,0.16391551,0.005395503,0.0991233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022564319,0.00068984093,0.31749845,0.00013446737,0.00029668474,0.00072476396,0.0007763379,0.16329792,0.007408246,0.50702643,0.0017960952,0.00012510212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006525749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005009121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008907266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035150698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004393135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029797733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043284836","doi":"10.1177/0272989x20938056","title":"The Effect of Information Formats and Incidental Affect on Prior and Posterior Probability Judgments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Computer science; Bayesian probability; Test (biology); Table (database); Bayesian inference; Task (project management); Posterior probability; Inference; Probabilistic logic; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Natural language processing; Information retrieval; Statistics; Data mining; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04839277711880483,"score_gpt":0.37641689393958977,"score_spread":0.3280241168207849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043284836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946708,0.00013865813,0.0016778994,0.000067643305,0.000057521567,0.000121226476,0.000059962833,0.000042104875,0.0031642101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99689305,0.00009142421,0.0022672175,0.00009688413,0.00004854411,0.00010311166,0.00006116854,0.000027502041,0.00041104972],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964474,0.0014680604,0.00030535774,0.00068695605,0.0009515209,0.0001407599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8985251,0.08573932,0.008182856,0.0041018305,0.0016565378,0.0017943732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042651654,0.00054066186,0.00036467574,0.00035425578,0.00048306058,0.0019553683,0.00038788526,0.0005720619,0.0047032647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06740923,0.00043714017,0.00031226195,0.00020287027,0.0011878217,0.001158276,0.0010240264,0.0008445374,0.0003219079],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04455607,0.0074358624,0.37953854,0.0015341879,0.00062863406,0.0015189729,0.028419485,0.003775425,0.29460406,0.0023821208,0.002083197,0.23352343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007114186,0.008750268,0.96477026,0.0001397585,0.000318099,0.00076031225,0.001684874,0.0037110096,0.013974397,0.0035008802,0.0015408199,0.00013793846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005494082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059527997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047032647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037891197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022556603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043991219","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104390","title":"Future thinking about social targets: The influence of prediction outcome on memory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Outcome (game theory); Expectancy theory; Trait; Social cognition; Cognition; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.11499376377240744,"score_gpt":0.3734941258676917,"score_spread":0.25850036209528426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043991219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98635155,0.00040528565,0.002098797,0.0007689375,0.00005928714,0.00001901395,0.00010899459,0.000021670197,0.010166556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980597,0.0001895211,0.0006342144,0.000115710915,0.00004880007,0.000010461683,0.00008253799,0.000031018146,0.00082809693],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986077,0.00064468215,0.000060642007,0.0002845354,0.00025492432,0.00014769586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9651958,0.027565047,0.0026710706,0.0018205426,0.0010729562,0.0016746117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040775705,0.00046282524,0.0007757103,0.000669838,0.00050333317,0.004177879,0.0008233649,0.0018880022,0.007700878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036383417,0.00045236846,0.00052968744,0.0005420638,0.001174302,0.0024175742,0.0010635777,0.0021653324,0.00065529026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02312706,0.0070064873,0.6075227,0.00070511264,0.0018556882,0.0017366138,0.004064479,0.027650585,0.05919546,0.024758324,0.0050642,0.2373132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005415439,0.0025974396,0.83540255,0.00013372806,0.0008009323,0.0006080183,0.0010648298,0.050882917,0.007633637,0.09856179,0.0015950352,0.00017760006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025296381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027175196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007700878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006287699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078907906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025762022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045518291","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2007.14361","title":"Assessing Risks of Biases in Cognitive Decision Support Systems","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Component (thermodynamics); Biometrics; Cognition; Process (computing); Decision support system; Risk analysis (engineering); Cognitive bias; Face (sociological concept); Risk assessment; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Computer security; Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.6998893331342111,"score_gpt":0.4081550050253572,"score_spread":0.2917343281088539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045518291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66702753,0.00073988555,0.32304457,0.0020245314,0.000079513295,0.00019802556,0.00010897322,0.00025550686,0.0065214583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9613048,0.00017649929,0.038028315,0.00009952601,0.00002809341,0.00006757723,0.000030674724,0.000017642147,0.00024701143],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880207,0.006240434,0.00070963474,0.001009924,0.0032858178,0.00073345035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91103953,0.07297616,0.006542169,0.00415639,0.004231695,0.001054013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020791633,0.0010308095,0.0009711162,0.0015114775,0.0011474491,0.0043390617,0.0011507417,0.0017221179,0.0012567473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10067428,0.000526074,0.0007776483,0.0011390921,0.0020907968,0.005634749,0.0035867435,0.0026417358,0.00017953447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012395129,0.0005684646,0.048255857,0.00040944087,0.000597729,0.00033190736,0.002763501,0.6877298,0.005009344,0.07683635,0.0010140816,0.17524412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005865382,0.0004889546,0.008938221,0.00012513292,0.00011804794,0.00012437647,0.00077209255,0.80842227,0.0037027674,0.17600566,0.0011324083,0.00011147174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033693926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018693951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020791633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019163176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015354237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10995799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046183466","doi":"10.1007/s10683-020-09668-6","title":"Learn or react? An experimental study of preventive health decision making","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Southern Methodist University; York University; Universität Basel","keywords":"Actuarial science; Health risk; Adverse effect; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Emerging technologies; Medicine; Environmental health; Computer science; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.21520137863268252,"score_gpt":0.4693561955269315,"score_spread":0.25415481689424896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046183466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949143,0.00007294047,0.0020779588,0.00044913328,0.00005837959,0.00026374482,0.00012520765,0.000020013917,0.002018407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940819,0.00007635355,0.0034975314,0.0003692775,0.0000453065,0.0006134165,0.00010560954,0.000008507029,0.0012021131],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966,0.002323702,0.00017707853,0.00040939613,0.00025468584,0.00023515965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9159331,0.06593313,0.009060739,0.006625919,0.000839363,0.0016078212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073130485,0.0007069393,0.00073167036,0.00033544237,0.0005514307,0.0017073489,0.0010897176,0.0018310804,0.007854321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035308085,0.0006673014,0.0005687493,0.00025975762,0.0016520678,0.0015235969,0.0009546239,0.002663959,0.0006415277],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.09779759,0.3568539,0.14936194,0.0027562513,0.002459685,0.0013111385,0.008976112,0.07639436,0.11203436,0.07852591,0.00868004,0.10484876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.036385003,0.2104507,0.13150597,0.0006198283,0.0012580806,0.0008448235,0.004335592,0.3775121,0.055828117,0.16373095,0.016788637,0.00074016897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086361193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059704797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007854321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006764628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007542349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038675547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048604892","doi":"10.1007/s40070-020-00114-9","title":"Effects of information presentation on regulatory decisions for products of biotechnology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Genome Canada","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Psychology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Management science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.09087609137174651,"score_gpt":0.3723480374679482,"score_spread":0.2814719460962017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048604892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99491113,0.00023855454,0.00066302094,0.00031923922,0.00004472695,0.00012413814,0.000032472497,0.000018149905,0.0036485323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99666804,0.000233346,0.0017018989,0.00015800142,0.00006672194,0.00011970695,0.00006322663,0.0000088710885,0.0009802564],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9777868,0.016573736,0.0015419587,0.0009196166,0.0024856622,0.00069223164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5816625,0.37873963,0.028295461,0.0040999088,0.003980895,0.003221608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0140591385,0.0007565327,0.00062938564,0.0008487869,0.00069264893,0.0025285135,0.0005446564,0.001848515,0.0069601396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12513076,0.0003321689,0.0007508658,0.00050788047,0.0012014358,0.0019170712,0.0017261278,0.002152365,0.00048541554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.1225519,0.035715804,0.2770831,0.0047573596,0.0017260598,0.002086494,0.01692475,0.030226724,0.098526955,0.0055836192,0.002363615,0.40245354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009668696,0.0992195,0.7324694,0.0017930907,0.0030274887,0.001073303,0.020861274,0.040660735,0.046723045,0.033620063,0.009891424,0.0009919414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051479886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005410879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0140591385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011065112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000900935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07435274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080434239","doi":"10.1109/isit44484.2020.9174378","title":"Comparison of Information Structures for Zero-Sum Games in Standard Borel Spaces","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Converse; Mathematics; Generalization; Corollary; Mathematical economics; Zero-sum game; Characterization (materials science); Zero (linguistics); Complete information; Space (punctuation); Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Game theory; Computer science; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.1580900804845851,"score_gpt":0.4411473153183732,"score_spread":0.2830572348337881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080434239","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3054699,0.0011170957,0.6505658,0.0017446249,0.000117644486,0.00024492104,0.00048136723,0.00018581613,0.040072855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9228085,0.0007780844,0.072059944,0.00031798033,0.00010953072,0.00029995636,0.0003504151,0.000050533712,0.0032250271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916278,0.003536867,0.00061624165,0.0009388165,0.0024063392,0.0008740057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9716959,0.021223372,0.0023846223,0.001381525,0.0019384861,0.0013760892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0085922945,0.00096898124,0.0013085372,0.0027375892,0.0012018341,0.0051301327,0.0014763831,0.0016855715,0.0033583178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02930754,0.00055918837,0.0011547606,0.0016232699,0.0047629126,0.009202037,0.002613597,0.0027015116,0.0003975588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007016354,0.000043020136,0.00029217976,0.00006222207,0.000020042658,0.000033256387,0.00018407348,0.008183009,0.0005766572,0.98489875,0.00022112844,0.0054155323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025625091,0.00007649896,0.0002774897,0.0000374017,0.000011889223,0.000030696578,0.00008603914,0.032175988,0.00060222705,0.96594083,0.00070832745,0.000026942776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078885315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006099784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0085922945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003097109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020551875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045440912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082627313","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/gkduw","title":"Cultivating credibility with probability words and numbers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Ministère de la Défense Nationale","keywords":"Credibility; Probability distribution; Probability model; Computer science; Econometrics; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10962276744340586,"score_gpt":0.3752661060700869,"score_spread":0.26564333862668105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082627313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90736467,0.000828281,0.054196134,0.0027992248,0.00028365976,0.0001674108,0.00010635729,0.00037597344,0.033878334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97334677,0.00035010962,0.02429397,0.0003697796,0.00012832941,0.00011794309,0.0000699123,0.00006867957,0.0012544229],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921834,0.004423983,0.00045169523,0.0010809833,0.0015980942,0.00026188107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8436683,0.12920558,0.014464769,0.0068635307,0.003813711,0.0019841364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0082977405,0.0009815304,0.000624113,0.0010382739,0.00053142256,0.0041312934,0.00092840387,0.0017263308,0.007745639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1285061,0.000636183,0.0004407754,0.0006578746,0.002667813,0.008172845,0.003002995,0.0023659146,0.0008499747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008806889,0.0042686276,0.071391776,0.0039577587,0.00053189957,0.0015032871,0.034932,0.022180213,0.14801814,0.20287152,0.005548894,0.49598908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002446187,0.0072765513,0.09453253,0.0013035019,0.0012988435,0.0018007051,0.0074274135,0.109008014,0.07007838,0.6739235,0.030259559,0.0006449215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042356626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035474263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0082977405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081694743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007497318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043883204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084133646","doi":"10.7554/elife.54051.sa2","title":"Author response: Neural arbitration between social and individual learning systems","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Social decision making; Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Social learning; Psychology; Prefrontal cortex; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Knowledge management; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.4572059540925723,"score_gpt":0.4854881480733975,"score_spread":0.02828219398082521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084133646","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027169723,0.0016130692,0.011969138,0.75287795,0.1824149,0.0005324987,0.011540973,0.0023042092,0.03403024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06657297,0.0036718221,0.016693365,0.6590867,0.064997084,0.0041054646,0.009613085,0.0014361884,0.17382334],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950675,0.0021874765,0.00038828602,0.000694931,0.0012715015,0.00039039462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9600753,0.023715375,0.0013284158,0.0030145177,0.010346907,0.0015194254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006555182,0.0011863179,0.0012046862,0.001092358,0.0018426864,0.002780392,0.0025624377,0.01095659,0.18698806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074826166,0.0007796193,0.0012561686,0.00090426364,0.0017385307,0.0029085986,0.0028011801,0.0062937536,0.057607673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021351824,0.000014522425,0.00031629164,0.00012214357,0.00001728435,0.00007852313,0.00006503014,0.00018304106,0.00012954377,0.0026973118,0.9881251,0.008037775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054700754,0.00011516444,0.0020747774,0.00075164216,0.000051715433,0.00028657197,0.00057383557,0.002349358,0.0013419715,0.03847095,0.9533049,0.0001322474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023562708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029821328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18698806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022950538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032906467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6255374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084582880","doi":"10.1038/s41562-020-00941-5","title":"Divisive normalization does influence decisions with multiple alternatives","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Nature Human Behaviour","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services","keywords":"Normalization (sociology); Psychology; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.06577026278852935,"score_gpt":0.3768451235969591,"score_spread":0.3110748608084297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084582880","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025614008,0.00080891803,0.008112524,0.8342916,0.0054531717,0.00003910797,0.00009722798,0.00014288249,0.1254406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59469795,0.0013287485,0.006098013,0.32537273,0.012897711,0.000096905766,0.00007659352,0.0002973739,0.05913395],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961747,0.0015452754,0.00020034848,0.00046816276,0.0012010819,0.00041049175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94344103,0.045949522,0.0013046212,0.0034657174,0.0044560363,0.0013830034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010516957,0.000306166,0.0007439428,0.00046803063,0.0017679688,0.0034006177,0.0011817215,0.009299894,0.011322409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065938875,0.00026939233,0.0006630193,0.00046924595,0.0048361085,0.0035416617,0.0012466327,0.00988341,0.0024910695],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015995993,0.00034996698,0.012098208,0.00015997997,0.00014525835,0.002811462,0.0012839248,0.003208857,0.0028753683,0.2668122,0.47155526,0.23709998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033080258,0.0001326229,0.008457976,0.00015637382,0.0000687445,0.0010728076,0.00083772227,0.019409971,0.0041205715,0.72860193,0.23673046,0.000080025755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005380504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009420627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011322409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028428922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020168985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055619657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086204950","doi":"10.1111/jems.12402","title":"The effects of ambiguity on entrepreneurship","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economics & Management Strategy","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Entrepreneurship; Ambiguity aversion; Investment (military); Microeconomics; Economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Econometrics; Expected utility hypothesis; Financial economics; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.1266603414303841,"score_gpt":0.3552229724469493,"score_spread":0.22856263101656518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3086204950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8789365,0.0010814685,0.06517229,0.0028749297,0.000104116996,0.000033722474,0.00011822837,0.000040516392,0.05163811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99847466,0.00013772024,0.0008308025,0.0000530393,0.000023811937,0.0000045201405,0.000004241709,0.000002527486,0.00046861486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986731,0.00065387,0.000047059926,0.00011167275,0.00027735543,0.00023696786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97922987,0.016944762,0.0017972125,0.0008477825,0.00045041513,0.0007299409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026479028,0.00038705824,0.0006134146,0.0005420049,0.00052733667,0.0021734857,0.00039196535,0.0008312759,0.003764584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018130751,0.00026677453,0.00047845408,0.00042806537,0.0018553027,0.0022022077,0.0020034504,0.0012967958,0.00018938215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007169204,0.00039239254,0.022800067,0.00021339628,0.00016941644,0.0012045495,0.0007310681,0.33269173,0.0061968984,0.5908692,0.0013555475,0.042658795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008237779,0.00032546173,0.016292641,0.00007269932,0.00012618504,0.00038308994,0.00047194646,0.26813474,0.0022598957,0.7097538,0.0020014073,0.00009567809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052242324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030213658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003764584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006513706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038185445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014003634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087152258","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12649","title":"Root Cause Analysis and Its Effect on Auditors' Judgments and Decisions in an Integrated Audit*","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Materiality (auditing); Audit; Accounting; Quality audit; Psychology; Control (management); Cognition; Audit risk; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.25757745694492734,"score_gpt":0.4658375207085678,"score_spread":0.20826006376364048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087152258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99780816,0.000050660714,0.00094435835,0.000055316166,0.000006238655,0.000072377086,0.000020451902,0.000021451526,0.0010210038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99816495,0.000025168814,0.0015081961,0.000023017745,0.000005984255,0.00003207896,0.00001858602,0.0000044579997,0.00021762474],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9652665,0.016114876,0.0029345367,0.0026680862,0.011915625,0.0011005142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67511284,0.20518082,0.08136284,0.017681288,0.014152381,0.0065098866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021237865,0.00050956506,0.00076758454,0.0013301754,0.0007854455,0.0028593617,0.00070609426,0.0006338937,0.002236349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14428326,0.00042160242,0.0008104139,0.00086271093,0.001266381,0.0011329866,0.001962869,0.0012401904,0.00023355879],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007376885,0.0025992712,0.8386496,0.00024291531,0.0005211046,0.00016685741,0.007328247,0.0025335997,0.008965763,0.0004534282,0.0003618499,0.1308006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013028404,0.003925281,0.9801073,0.000111282796,0.00017993091,0.00012936846,0.0026653775,0.008218981,0.0029192306,0.0009012287,0.00061855355,0.00009314827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033763975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057370723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021237865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014806526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00201938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11231792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087846925","doi":"10.1007/s10683-020-09678-4","title":"Is the Allais paradox due to appeal of certainty or aversion to zero?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Technology Sydney; Carnegie Mellon University","keywords":"Certainty; Zero (linguistics); Economics; Nothing; Mathematical economics; Phenomenon; Contrast (vision); Prospect theory; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Physics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.20023718666876034,"score_gpt":0.40577978501148987,"score_spread":0.20554259834272953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087846925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72189784,0.003282356,0.15028006,0.04184732,0.0012387005,0.000120634366,0.00024242054,0.00024004879,0.08085059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99589705,0.0002832299,0.0021705832,0.0009673076,0.00014018676,0.000020898835,0.000014416546,0.000014124363,0.00049218145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548304,0.0019410243,0.00033214263,0.00065262173,0.0012358557,0.0003553739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9497215,0.033135876,0.0073114163,0.006006567,0.0022348303,0.0015896985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010351657,0.0003484353,0.0012029117,0.0009586977,0.0008079931,0.0033902714,0.0012943218,0.0026372783,0.0068034674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06694467,0.00029393865,0.00070585514,0.0007857962,0.009470103,0.0069605485,0.002542459,0.0034285644,0.00039803106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050560606,0.00017173249,0.008127801,0.00037374103,0.00015956628,0.0008519097,0.0010169853,0.0027219518,0.0032936877,0.9521908,0.0029444806,0.02764172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040836963,0.000041115312,0.0014108752,0.000023515999,0.000017488393,0.00021429508,0.00023937074,0.0026865567,0.00026823033,0.99397933,0.0010535687,0.000024681905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045528184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030402403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010351657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008069436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007383547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054745436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089376958","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2210","title":"The moderating role of processing style in risk perceptions and risky decision making","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Risk perception; Perception; Psychology; Social psychology; Risk aversion (psychology); Risk analysis (engineering); Style (visual arts); Risk assessment; Medicine; Computer science; Economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer security","score_opus":0.08454026949192234,"score_gpt":0.4135205257038696,"score_spread":0.32898025621194726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089376958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968804,0.000053830456,0.00044680052,0.000088605695,0.000008472245,0.000010496683,0.00001958396,0.0000045216943,0.002487224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880266,0.000054161203,0.00062813354,0.000031673186,0.000007406146,0.000013847221,0.000019377521,0.0000047837284,0.00043800363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990415,0.00048262844,0.00005597517,0.00012989879,0.00020854917,0.0000814159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803908,0.013471331,0.0036738869,0.00084671343,0.0005694109,0.0010479343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019850282,0.0003724585,0.00020420937,0.0004416752,0.00041519606,0.0028396188,0.0002595888,0.00068589847,0.009530265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01846175,0.0002263396,0.00038460142,0.0003319321,0.00081529573,0.0011323063,0.00072677905,0.0010037114,0.0002751912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019260942,0.0031631142,0.8939818,0.00043732102,0.000420165,0.00044141957,0.027669908,0.0015641819,0.016418114,0.0058165286,0.00083347445,0.047327813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008963318,0.00072378304,0.9767989,0.00014411114,0.00016857636,0.0001905072,0.008485879,0.004156231,0.0019713643,0.00570617,0.0015126885,0.00005230511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012774653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001728923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009530265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030993248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032314367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03188193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091841424","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109608","title":"On expected utility theorems on mixture sets","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom independence; Axiom; Transitive relation; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematics; Axiom of choice; Independence (probability theory); Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory; Subjective expected utility; Combinatorics; Computer science; Set theory; Set (abstract data type); Statistics","score_opus":0.13063911144692988,"score_gpt":0.34717741494844373,"score_spread":0.21653830350151385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091841424","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014473278,0.0022099882,0.96149945,0.0030665256,0.00023582236,0.0000776525,0.00030385514,0.00014259234,0.017990775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5937391,0.010575754,0.3556211,0.0030377437,0.0031876995,0.0013375566,0.001362173,0.00076510984,0.030373702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930611,0.004250178,0.000303545,0.00063837605,0.0013208821,0.00042580673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8972729,0.09467974,0.0017342886,0.002423979,0.0027699019,0.001119157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021261448,0.0030367146,0.0038139415,0.0048319134,0.0013885874,0.005617135,0.005359688,0.0036490993,0.011051994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074097864,0.0022234365,0.0044719726,0.004322754,0.006288355,0.018869126,0.0070177573,0.008695833,0.001141929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054620854,0.000048849506,0.00025276354,0.00010330263,0.000063497704,0.000059268663,0.00014049973,0.01599248,0.00017997477,0.9753542,0.001483388,0.0062671034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016616252,0.0000136260805,0.00011906245,0.00004435525,0.000017837861,0.00003660692,0.000015853237,0.07077918,0.00010062733,0.92812747,0.0007132689,0.000015468508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024420016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012888255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021261448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041016373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001515966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11244267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092085399","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104420","title":"Thinking in a foreign language distorts allocation of cognitive effort: Evidence from reasoning","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Narodowe Centrum Nauki","keywords":"Syllogism; Psychology; Logical reasoning; Cognitive psychology; Foreign language; Cognition; Context (archaeology); Psychology of reasoning; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Verbal reasoning","score_opus":0.14096198959551698,"score_gpt":0.3882695714349855,"score_spread":0.24730758183946855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092085399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98688823,0.00016811915,0.0020235856,0.0006281031,0.000033953347,0.00002212682,0.00006411412,0.000019658108,0.0101520615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99776065,0.00013502917,0.0009849817,0.0003069768,0.000033466556,0.000019330666,0.00007021394,0.000031757165,0.00065760314],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942006,0.0027932653,0.0003265779,0.0009645678,0.0012627346,0.0004522378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8523895,0.111737706,0.017481923,0.013379584,0.0023245697,0.0026866156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013315045,0.0009301619,0.0009394546,0.0012461471,0.00072343455,0.0054443516,0.0012231399,0.0027687345,0.0104772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08377703,0.00074402144,0.0008297516,0.00069391256,0.004456422,0.0027785616,0.0018892447,0.002867426,0.0012667249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.053929493,0.017631128,0.59094304,0.0014840706,0.0046316413,0.004108258,0.013956106,0.0322755,0.05704961,0.08048885,0.00545926,0.1380431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042123445,0.0031920709,0.6469372,0.0002840175,0.0017525293,0.0021906889,0.0031716507,0.04226256,0.013294618,0.27789956,0.0044660694,0.0003367119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015643606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079556584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013315045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007220123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055654754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07041758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092980512","doi":"10.3758/s13421-020-01108-3","title":"Reasoning strategies predict use of very fast logical reasoning","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Logical reasoning; Verbal reasoning; Cognitive science; Deductive reasoning; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Analytic reasoning; Causal reasoning; Psychology of reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics education; Computer science; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.22554403598104905,"score_gpt":0.37119629759959405,"score_spread":0.145652261618545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092980512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914137,0.00027915544,0.0019261208,0.00029754706,0.00004385702,0.00007573912,0.00055223063,0.00007491043,0.005336834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99435544,0.00025761672,0.002719591,0.00020957658,0.000037180653,0.0000525804,0.00080789643,0.00010501223,0.0014550722],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982948,0.00045765165,0.0003231585,0.00031196812,0.00039449253,0.0002180584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.848636,0.117794864,0.0154064875,0.010913039,0.0032720526,0.003977554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005217702,0.0007016239,0.0005174719,0.0020891102,0.00027524342,0.004422424,0.0010416404,0.0028027135,0.009757279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0872709,0.0009168232,0.0008105059,0.0008299249,0.00077271415,0.0036446308,0.0013686195,0.0031199178,0.0022169212],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005585511,0.0035655543,0.9068996,0.00029085032,0.0011692045,0.0006384161,0.0009146606,0.0051947874,0.021342628,0.0052483208,0.002163981,0.04698659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005201388,0.0015939678,0.9259414,0.0001492887,0.0006716816,0.0030739848,0.0007141869,0.026210476,0.00922836,0.028437752,0.003286573,0.00017220262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010297715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010099501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009757279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005617901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03264135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093398578","doi":"10.1177/0022243720956642","title":"Preference Dynamics in Sequential Consumer Choice with Defaults","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Science Foundation; Erasmus Research Institute of Management; Canada Research Chairs; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement","keywords":"Default; Spillover effect; Preference; Economics; Consumer choice; Product (mathematics); Microeconomics; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.4765421875752669,"score_gpt":0.49566332838703386,"score_spread":0.019121140811766968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093398578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95343316,0.00013322325,0.038989954,0.00058724324,0.000013341237,0.000054918233,0.00010156483,0.000065246626,0.006621401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955474,0.000052843978,0.0033252228,0.000047722893,0.0000061637356,0.000023050494,0.00003420027,0.0000036834317,0.0009596128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979469,0.0010044983,0.000101859645,0.00038811934,0.00031373964,0.00024488958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98363423,0.011744518,0.0017979216,0.0015923296,0.0005637968,0.0006671704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038352953,0.00025843282,0.00085978286,0.00045629803,0.00057199516,0.0014366057,0.0008033005,0.0013889624,0.007067747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024883764,0.0004014728,0.00082333083,0.0005535711,0.0016402057,0.0031439462,0.0010644393,0.0019611844,0.00033708228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003144054,0.0020819998,0.17347221,0.00049006316,0.00053769397,0.003536786,0.0068809465,0.14542536,0.019195337,0.5173091,0.002797713,0.12512866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002712201,0.00068557466,0.070471056,0.00004475068,0.00009371548,0.00081478636,0.0016771578,0.41909087,0.0014692515,0.50326455,0.0019758942,0.0001412431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041991263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034528032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007067747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012518764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046688475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02364397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096710371","doi":"10.1162/rest_a_01232","title":"Identifying Rule-Based Rationality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economics and Statistics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Rationality; Decision rule; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Portfolio; Admissible decision rule; Mathematical economics; Function (biology); Rule-based system; Computer science; Observer (physics); Economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Decision analysis; Evidential reasoning approach; Business decision mapping; Financial economics","score_opus":0.20415181746430902,"score_gpt":0.42076364377819875,"score_spread":0.21661182631388973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096710371","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31946048,0.0009716862,0.6161747,0.004284495,0.00014599541,0.00030490712,0.0003639921,0.00021761094,0.058076147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96529937,0.00024858513,0.03305294,0.00020957555,0.0000364969,0.00015230873,0.00007575434,0.000015754214,0.0009091574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869391,0.008689943,0.00051110896,0.001447841,0.0019744972,0.00043765732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9386017,0.04515936,0.0044901394,0.008378332,0.0028823786,0.00048810444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013493813,0.00055802765,0.0010099983,0.0011424278,0.0004962251,0.0036609697,0.0011675133,0.0016889112,0.0030578428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0545455,0.00041710123,0.0007236138,0.00074431655,0.0042182533,0.00312976,0.0022962256,0.0020215358,0.0004497071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002567055,0.00013183341,0.00913571,0.0002819576,0.00020298343,0.0001385566,0.0009238437,0.035648562,0.0033641236,0.898599,0.001727175,0.049589485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045364548,0.000044862383,0.0016723649,0.000040181945,0.000024609462,0.00003647411,0.00012181366,0.08384218,0.0013475753,0.9112093,0.0015954082,0.000019836873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009018162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050039333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013493813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012630017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001212924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07136291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3098475884","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-48853-6_7","title":"A QP Framework: A Contextual Representation of Agents’ Preferences in Investment Choice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in computational intelligence","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Investment (military); Microeconomics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5692821209477834,"score_gpt":0.5178456250499837,"score_spread":0.05143649589779975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3098475884","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010277601,0.0008635657,0.96144855,0.0015537039,0.00009264765,0.00004367559,0.0006053742,0.00015124552,0.02496359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48512933,0.0016558245,0.5010442,0.00038083998,0.000328689,0.00028421133,0.0008152228,0.00020894088,0.0101526175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995486,0.0002445392,0.000023409351,0.000082194885,0.00006185633,0.000039437695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992767,0.0004460206,0.000045252273,0.00008669884,0.00007591575,0.000069483205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010843854,0.00047898595,0.0004973839,0.00061547366,0.0004327977,0.0020776927,0.0011473409,0.00086462434,0.010499925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003357432,0.00038554997,0.0006988115,0.0015366678,0.0011167506,0.0043324274,0.0010241161,0.0018138541,0.000918345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015054948,0.000013171596,0.00016697183,0.000039435825,0.000008677768,0.000035188157,0.00018102028,0.012064354,0.00027586558,0.97076327,0.0022167715,0.014220212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000636947,0.000011835135,0.00021802064,0.00001812207,0.00000905786,0.000022710623,0.00006330704,0.07661887,0.00009452676,0.9162374,0.0066920677,0.0000076404785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004198761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035260513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010499925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008768832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007937253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035125732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100577619","doi":"10.3758/s13421-020-01112-7","title":"Harm to others reduces the sunk-cost effect","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Kwantlen Polytechnic University","keywords":"Psychology; Harm; Sunk costs; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.20925522979849376,"score_gpt":0.41764632780098426,"score_spread":0.2083910980024905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100577619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89372724,0.0011622438,0.017260619,0.0039288434,0.0002572119,0.000073873365,0.00018214408,0.00024821042,0.08315966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99325776,0.00015151074,0.0015790546,0.00037417788,0.00003545435,0.000011351555,0.000027612032,0.00002958369,0.0045335884],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991033,0.00029964535,0.000046699293,0.00011070586,0.00024835003,0.00019130629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927735,0.0035450584,0.0009630147,0.0016911785,0.00037198284,0.00065541227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014407501,0.00049637054,0.00092246267,0.00053089374,0.0005832154,0.0014279459,0.00057988166,0.00211335,0.015113235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011779607,0.00023137957,0.0006345281,0.00029071464,0.00089767156,0.0015153908,0.0015225635,0.001456889,0.0010306367],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008304403,0.0073720086,0.060118392,0.0016865566,0.0010624751,0.0018680466,0.0014552226,0.036326583,0.06266236,0.36894366,0.016195668,0.43400472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006143618,0.0040866896,0.13502406,0.0002324762,0.0009379913,0.0026139675,0.0019754882,0.041039627,0.022190042,0.76685935,0.024267288,0.00015860215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069720636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084945647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015113235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061465264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070501846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050558805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100984816","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/mktgj","title":"Effect of Confidence Interval Construction on Judgment Accuracy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Confidence interval; Univariate; Statistics; Range (aeronautics); Skepticism; Interval (graph theory); Psychology; Expert elicitation; Mathematics; Social psychology; Engineering; Multivariate statistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1453684563854634,"score_gpt":0.42860886850240126,"score_spread":0.28324041211693785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100984816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98477083,0.0006318791,0.010710586,0.0001593044,0.0000671011,0.00025163908,0.00007252841,0.00015140428,0.0031846256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98771507,0.00016624724,0.011061429,0.00012893193,0.00004000823,0.00033830575,0.000114984345,0.00007522097,0.00035974063],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9310458,0.043382894,0.0071660294,0.006039315,0.010707648,0.0016583024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2088367,0.73571926,0.019497601,0.026029773,0.00857364,0.0013430135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050438773,0.0009822471,0.0012660857,0.0008988034,0.0008482767,0.0024274334,0.0013378832,0.0016664729,0.0030285202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.419624,0.0009686135,0.00078998046,0.0009823921,0.0016927989,0.0030887285,0.0028189966,0.0021628137,0.00043212553],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07457137,0.0059632333,0.22070843,0.0024416528,0.0017257879,0.00044240121,0.018043267,0.011631711,0.21179853,0.0035535512,0.0015546606,0.44756538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035192126,0.024398744,0.75598,0.00065703597,0.0018321252,0.001316066,0.0028137632,0.04223912,0.14920488,0.010770761,0.006394794,0.00087357964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010206326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010877723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050438773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009916017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008794625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2667489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102774394","doi":"","title":"A PREQUENTIAL TEST FOR EXCHANGEABLE THEORIES","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Test (biology); Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Geology; Programming language","score_opus":0.16950472369260655,"score_gpt":0.4197963985967314,"score_spread":0.25029167490412485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102774394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5231056,0.00047499183,0.42780367,0.01863997,0.0006676067,0.00019068406,0.0011399592,0.0008125885,0.027164932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97802347,0.00008904927,0.018857777,0.0011635195,0.00034565182,0.00013283126,0.00038710688,0.00004220948,0.00095838297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96318924,0.01727472,0.002057734,0.008792501,0.00678971,0.0018960936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.40949953,0.52795357,0.026038405,0.023789285,0.008739012,0.0039802436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043693155,0.0017087458,0.0022785356,0.003067433,0.0015517413,0.0042571435,0.005520996,0.006654861,0.014780379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33125412,0.000721327,0.002546046,0.0019727496,0.011040393,0.011450166,0.004513442,0.0076249,0.0011799701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031026525,0.0007857369,0.070630476,0.00051435374,0.0013404903,0.0019669575,0.001284173,0.033364803,0.004508202,0.80768716,0.0074938796,0.067321055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090624194,0.0012069113,0.013434824,0.00011958076,0.00022592723,0.0010477555,0.00031711144,0.19825837,0.004514604,0.7769992,0.0028295266,0.00013989037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061424123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033180774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043693155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014120936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025763332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23107427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3105916523","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2214","title":"Resistance to cognitive biases: Longitudinal trajectories and associations with cognitive abilities and academic achievement across development","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Sophistication; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive bias; Cognitive development","score_opus":0.25177638378962885,"score_gpt":0.46229602915947454,"score_spread":0.2105196453698457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3105916523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993131,0.00008375866,0.000090804184,0.000022849634,0.0000015143348,0.0000036236283,0.00031751406,0.0000059887393,0.00016066096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988953,0.000089665475,0.00019324773,0.0000054443212,0.0000021124254,0.000011583381,0.0005527697,0.00000387297,0.00024592498],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950325,0.00009613209,0.00005200959,0.00013571452,0.000112628,0.00010016606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946485,0.000822987,0.002529026,0.00036131137,0.00094646076,0.0006917327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020015207,0.0003026287,0.00024775838,0.001423359,0.00048215504,0.0010235119,0.00048430887,0.0005746761,0.0010265973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061296388,0.00036655442,0.00046697137,0.0009528288,0.00040474723,0.0006419956,0.00094557897,0.0010402432,0.00024576375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006126733,0.000042116815,0.9969722,0.000004767463,0.000026925112,0.000051734954,0.00026257974,0.00009800712,0.0003797153,0.000037569014,0.00005088986,0.0020122684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.5292254e-7,0.000067394176,0.9993079,0.0000040353793,0.000006351486,0.00006959347,0.00013358332,0.00016816318,0.0001395146,0.000024437668,0.0000751407,0.0000030217136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013555135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010868678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013555135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042925592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005456489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026952505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111313474","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.11.003","title":"Optimal frequency of portfolio evaluation in a choice experiment with ambiguity and loss aversion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Econometrics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ambiguity aversion; Ambiguity; Econometrics; Portfolio; Loss aversion; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Financial economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.38443441874916884,"score_gpt":0.39841937936487454,"score_spread":0.0139849606157057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111313474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98827004,0.00007098771,0.009769257,0.00024172179,0.00005637429,0.00013810549,0.000055200882,0.00006344542,0.0013347791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873691,0.00005513168,0.011279458,0.000092088216,0.000036390677,0.00022658592,0.00004223752,0.00002709969,0.00087199715],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965462,0.0018013978,0.00030410232,0.00054669,0.0005010205,0.0003006417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9213333,0.06752432,0.0042940956,0.003683507,0.0008444681,0.0023202603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010045912,0.0006874746,0.0014891558,0.00061440456,0.00033628114,0.0022389083,0.00064227125,0.0019158645,0.0037230102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051378243,0.00071984227,0.00033525965,0.0003661856,0.0007976708,0.0016933744,0.000943768,0.0014082219,0.0003185445],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.2020997,0.041104566,0.066728674,0.0010339657,0.0011965953,0.00037239277,0.0016180325,0.08907041,0.3402583,0.054996934,0.0019002358,0.19962026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0225769,0.03954455,0.111311905,0.0002079701,0.0010859615,0.0005454309,0.0005885019,0.5961155,0.0433323,0.18153282,0.0025895457,0.00056860823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047450382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043629823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010045912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069615204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001055194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05312854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113583650","doi":"10.1177/0952695120976330","title":"The past of predicting the future: A review of the multidisciplinary history of affective forecasting","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"History of the Human Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Utilitarianism; Affect (linguistics); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Psychology; Cognition; Order (exchange); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Economics; Sociology; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.30838342556340076,"score_gpt":0.4150042689328311,"score_spread":0.10662084336943034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113583650","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002610216,0.9987393,0.00008890529,0.00048627285,0.00018378017,0.0000016658903,0.000006086366,0.0000020588013,0.00046580998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00048758066,0.9986953,0.000117524316,0.000257933,0.00031556078,0.0000035927335,0.000010081356,0.000001499143,0.00011099422],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992397,0.00026465257,0.00011599321,0.000117362404,0.00022344335,0.0000388039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99444133,0.0044239913,0.00028556952,0.00010059513,0.00058947125,0.00015910777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001904273,0.0010927275,0.0018107961,0.004570197,0.00057048834,0.0021692396,0.0011729443,0.0019323152,0.004158846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006591623,0.0005837657,0.0007697953,0.0062440424,0.0016229786,0.0039899163,0.001045611,0.0033640265,0.0019965712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007623514,0.00006642971,0.00029439392,0.02603017,0.00015586846,0.00010460673,0.00022461354,0.0007331899,0.00021595105,0.015667055,0.049839623,0.9065919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015166187,0.000065727676,0.0012912762,0.024401449,0.00015841027,0.0005513752,0.00017868134,0.00020007794,0.00010879013,0.01308266,0.9599013,0.000044973272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029668037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004137448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004570197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001661533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002695643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013912737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113686433","doi":"10.23919/eusipco47968.2020.9287384","title":"Assessing Risks of Biases in Cognitive Decision Support Systems","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada; University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Component (thermodynamics); Biometrics; Decision support system; Process (computing); Cognitive bias; Cognition; Face (sociological concept); Risk analysis (engineering); Facial recognition system; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Feature extraction; Psychology","score_opus":0.6861791172779647,"score_gpt":0.5509767838581452,"score_spread":0.13520233341981946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113686433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7146534,0.00062407966,0.27665374,0.0015892949,0.00007031583,0.00023328116,0.00009755695,0.00023477447,0.0058435816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96056616,0.00014507821,0.038859133,0.00008588028,0.000021923866,0.00007036215,0.000029042632,0.000014991771,0.00020747453],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880287,0.006090848,0.0007624411,0.00093388406,0.0034093615,0.0007748375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91147935,0.071463004,0.006895255,0.0043289997,0.004793228,0.001040203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021145543,0.0010234539,0.0009032441,0.00155868,0.0011621463,0.004120619,0.0011369701,0.0016046873,0.0011605893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09983806,0.00053476775,0.0008175635,0.0010721041,0.0018064462,0.0054912297,0.003459359,0.002318715,0.00017047652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014476007,0.0006184374,0.057888225,0.0004180407,0.0006441507,0.00033489513,0.0028710219,0.6877235,0.005720566,0.05618412,0.0008593637,0.18529008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006596101,0.000696623,0.011010059,0.00014990788,0.0001489204,0.00015300048,0.0009513956,0.85555995,0.004585333,0.12530133,0.0012410692,0.00013640367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034785944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022551955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021145543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018789198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015852011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11182964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118559982","doi":"10.1109/cdc42340.2020.9303898","title":"Mean field social optimization: feedback person-by-person optimality and the master equation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Mathematical optimization; Measure (data warehouse); Dynamic programming; Computer science; Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation; Quadratic programming; Optimization problem; Mathematics; Quadratic equation; Applied mathematics; Bellman equation","score_opus":0.2694410763813087,"score_gpt":0.35954635642446636,"score_spread":0.09010528004315765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118559982","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10736248,0.0006014896,0.8572021,0.0056292266,0.00015378586,0.000093717375,0.00019207015,0.00012802881,0.028637033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9360169,0.0005060507,0.0487341,0.00051477586,0.00013160885,0.00023669338,0.000075797616,0.000052934443,0.013731192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864703,0.00070073636,0.000030491126,0.00021092557,0.00025107033,0.00015982364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982127,0.0011816728,0.00023126611,0.00010215707,0.00013992528,0.00013238426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029235473,0.0005609307,0.0012052234,0.00039684013,0.0006382984,0.0011593048,0.0012206185,0.0022241136,0.0046101497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006682306,0.00039450734,0.0006168428,0.00045450803,0.0019897702,0.00274907,0.0015904193,0.0013979598,0.0003043001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042008804,0.0000550811,0.00042672706,0.00005106368,0.000028792268,0.00009670169,0.00011833955,0.18880573,0.0008065718,0.802412,0.0014073838,0.005749589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029280394,0.00003870671,0.00026020678,0.000013734481,0.0000072034363,0.000027055647,0.000038474886,0.57466894,0.00014220302,0.42377248,0.0009849546,0.000016771619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004365314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022812323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046101497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019186813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019721058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015461385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119219909","doi":"10.3758/s13423-020-01848-y","title":"Confidence in risky value-based choice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Psychology; Value (mathematics); Certainty; Confidence interval; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Overconfidence effect; Perception; Cognitive psychology; Statistics","score_opus":0.14896986695084452,"score_gpt":0.4449513080087829,"score_spread":0.2959814410579384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119219909","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32437086,0.607322,0.013231458,0.03541582,0.0015019345,0.00003532501,0.00021188501,0.000026034837,0.017884739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91513944,0.080709346,0.0010053805,0.0012941589,0.0012778391,0.000014857824,0.000059956,0.000005987095,0.0004931035],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982565,0.0009183918,0.00014768587,0.00017219823,0.0004049753,0.00010030592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91169,0.07872812,0.005264147,0.0009984133,0.002273231,0.0010462459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054786433,0.00022704944,0.00062253687,0.0006956891,0.00018943362,0.0018318876,0.00052491296,0.0012682581,0.0023769238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062912874,0.00023871439,0.00040866286,0.00077194546,0.0018412503,0.0020895526,0.000705461,0.0026031556,0.00016236922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018669834,0.00040829374,0.067908145,0.003715692,0.0010937672,0.00036587557,0.00074500253,0.007109312,0.00070203,0.16434756,0.006136304,0.7456012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002683731,0.00053126196,0.18352497,0.0029305252,0.0007506821,0.00087966496,0.00047450542,0.014016605,0.0010639942,0.7718628,0.023558822,0.00013775053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013571979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000822792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054786433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088128826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006424393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028974235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121210304","doi":"10.1287/moor.2015.0736","title":"Local Utility and Multivariate Risk Aversion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics of Operations Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Multivariate statistics; Multivariate analysis; Expected utility hypothesis; Independence (probability theory); Risk aversion (psychology); Risk measure; Measure (data warehouse); Rank (graph theory); Extension (predicate logic)","score_opus":0.3745943975959188,"score_gpt":0.5166390033561686,"score_spread":0.14204460576024985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121210304","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2165289,0.001998846,0.7322229,0.0029742215,0.000059732763,0.000046457102,0.00011220955,0.00007742566,0.045979284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97328013,0.0006468913,0.022449877,0.0001624425,0.00008562732,0.000041619896,0.000024858871,0.000019514873,0.003289014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989544,0.0004859668,0.000036061538,0.0001511515,0.000244405,0.00012804422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612385,0.001890427,0.0008362176,0.0004774836,0.00036787696,0.0003040906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002176988,0.0005359251,0.0006692628,0.0010504598,0.00057774223,0.0017760905,0.00093988207,0.0005640021,0.0035657843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006299432,0.00023723867,0.001057828,0.0011572461,0.0029747905,0.0036562977,0.0024706258,0.0019370911,0.00026513496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023720791,0.000037666872,0.0019104442,0.00004638693,0.000033392713,0.00010716641,0.00047357508,0.00932881,0.00065205566,0.9730638,0.00038025854,0.013942701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000091373695,0.000055569108,0.0019470658,0.000032592397,0.000022529443,0.000121870056,0.00011760458,0.03461913,0.00039991373,0.95997894,0.0026705347,0.000025055586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009501649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081655366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035657843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012767871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044133788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011928737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121263656","doi":"10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00432.x","title":"The Effect of Incentive Structure on Heuristic Decision Making: The Proportion Heuristic<sup>1</sup>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Incentive; Heuristic; Compensation (psychology); Psychology; Test (biology); Social psychology; Computer science; Operations research; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.038334182065178406,"score_gpt":0.4239470602971141,"score_spread":0.3856128782319357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121263656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693532,0.00040560475,0.012862199,0.00042499515,0.000051208914,0.0002032606,0.00006848099,0.000041241725,0.016589781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99104685,0.000120808996,0.008017723,0.0001538831,0.00003615874,0.00010235195,0.000030758485,0.0000141207365,0.00047723917],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99083626,0.0057660434,0.0005091671,0.0007436229,0.0018709581,0.0002739287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.781776,0.18574178,0.01767728,0.010443539,0.0018550379,0.0025063548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010678232,0.0005253542,0.0005667261,0.00066010864,0.00041947796,0.0018373075,0.0007256541,0.0011760467,0.0036428808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09231066,0.0004781482,0.00036854605,0.00039582772,0.0017894913,0.0018817954,0.0013867728,0.0015320414,0.00033841873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.035097614,0.012813719,0.18643193,0.0019728178,0.0014734971,0.00050340476,0.004801985,0.057028413,0.17758147,0.08642532,0.0019945754,0.43387538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027924664,0.032586988,0.5887353,0.00057656807,0.0012084418,0.0009492511,0.0013403193,0.119286664,0.07010722,0.17220229,0.009716809,0.0004976341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044118753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045426286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010678232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008535755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007764372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05647254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121266462","doi":"10.4018/ijsds.2011040101","title":"Strategic Diffusion of Information and Preference Manipulation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Lexicographical order; Preference; Computer science; Communication source; Decision maker; Verifiable secret sharing; Preference relation; Relation (database); Mathematical economics; Revealed preference; Operations research; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Economics; Data mining","score_opus":0.4893803146272365,"score_gpt":0.42394793504141537,"score_spread":0.06543237958582115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121266462","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24755919,0.0014536536,0.6228737,0.0059323343,0.00013009537,0.00021019578,0.00010409774,0.00014730157,0.12158947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645422,0.00051575043,0.031009903,0.00017245713,0.00006639937,0.00008249032,0.000031390995,0.000016272455,0.0035632115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956293,0.002606216,0.0002105296,0.00038651167,0.0009094076,0.00025805872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98067135,0.014160749,0.0022261788,0.002003174,0.0006227241,0.0003157432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004396989,0.0004863669,0.00048753797,0.0009423569,0.000913207,0.002669034,0.0006895505,0.0017139072,0.0051250053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023854444,0.0003682191,0.00061864086,0.0009994769,0.0034423396,0.0057205996,0.0027952471,0.0020808845,0.0003400247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060925388,0.00003820395,0.00069406774,0.00008208094,0.00002273305,0.00014800558,0.00071773253,0.0062247375,0.0014920746,0.97525793,0.0002488969,0.015012587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058290585,0.00009408077,0.0008056742,0.00004463727,0.000028389633,0.0003197863,0.00032562722,0.03639209,0.0019245686,0.9544358,0.005535723,0.000035236983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005209042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003314473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051250053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001307045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008574994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023253798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121427863","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500007695","title":"Performance on the Cognitive Reflection Test is stable across time","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Psychology; Cognition; Test (biology); Cognitive psychology; Set (abstract data type); Cognitive style; Stability (learning theory); Reflection (computer programming); Social psychology; Computer science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.14685114588288914,"score_gpt":0.4260042680523236,"score_spread":0.27915312216943444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121427863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973455,0.0001397191,0.00051959633,0.000092830975,0.000008813994,0.000011952215,0.00065128494,0.000009362346,0.001221054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986609,0.00003162219,0.00024225384,0.000023862987,0.0000081617945,0.0000149856905,0.00078958046,0.000005539669,0.00022309317],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978613,0.00056029833,0.00029208133,0.0005897322,0.0005139815,0.00018260488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9685393,0.009154234,0.014033045,0.0038852545,0.0031266273,0.0012616077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004410595,0.00019142967,0.0003438067,0.0014043013,0.0004162117,0.0010005758,0.0005873784,0.00055083365,0.0024787665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034465965,0.00024149123,0.00042384537,0.0016886049,0.00054587517,0.000767258,0.00079258747,0.00062652014,0.0005939592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029580275,0.000079012076,0.9892301,0.000022275606,0.0002534441,0.000056938272,0.0006482262,0.0001991173,0.0006719146,0.00018396384,0.00038933763,0.007969859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004788761,0.00006486652,0.9989888,0.000004426899,0.000015899743,0.000042198946,0.00014591294,0.00016929927,0.00017471521,0.00014759983,0.00023533586,0.0000061426776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003906929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040338878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004410595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002437917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027039228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023325741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121430297","doi":"","title":"Rationality, External Norms and the Epistemic Value of Menus","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Rationalizability; Epistemology; Norm (philosophy); Decision maker; Value (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Autonomy; Preference; Social psychology; Psychology; Mathematics; Economics; Microeconomics; Philosophy; Management science; Political science","score_opus":0.13718959150118637,"score_gpt":0.42977059897093484,"score_spread":0.29258100746974847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121430297","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17810735,0.0035054628,0.6063087,0.014207669,0.00028160107,0.000115937546,0.00018915972,0.000234861,0.19704936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967884,0.0009051034,0.02658431,0.00035999983,0.00017458234,0.000116337396,0.000052600903,0.00004062214,0.0038824887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99014825,0.005768118,0.0004101139,0.0009892992,0.0019914033,0.0006927807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97575104,0.016295,0.0024929957,0.0026505794,0.001881532,0.000928799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011219094,0.00067865726,0.0007955131,0.0017705484,0.001595723,0.0072169486,0.0014041294,0.002939964,0.0040078256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025675563,0.00039577903,0.000866016,0.0014509306,0.01640061,0.011266542,0.0043405206,0.0040101637,0.00036124774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013635183,0.000012418752,0.00018479966,0.000019529634,0.000008241631,0.00002073723,0.00021341711,0.0012500815,0.00009839706,0.9953151,0.00012817298,0.0027354278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061055316,0.000005583772,0.00009434008,0.000013803766,0.0000041142907,0.00001321692,0.00007614391,0.0021627594,0.00008128343,0.99651366,0.0010248359,0.0000042903575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009713044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079856213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011219094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022202788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014228935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059332967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121432893","doi":"","title":"On the Necessity of Using Lottery Qualities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de recherche","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Key (lock); Element (criminal law); Point (geometry); Prospect theory; Expected utility hypothesis; Decision theory; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Management science; Economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Microeconomics; Mathematics; Business; Computer security; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.7214948118791766,"score_gpt":0.5356992069958036,"score_spread":0.185795604883373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121432893","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005681347,0.033138704,0.08131598,0.5177247,0.334853,0.0002720782,0.0010747882,0.0005334513,0.025405988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2092609,0.04418552,0.14926483,0.11614246,0.41211966,0.0008706008,0.0009286917,0.0010563112,0.066171035],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827539,0.009822959,0.0015079756,0.0010222404,0.0045179063,0.00037500347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78408295,0.1736852,0.0036485011,0.0052715586,0.03170715,0.0016046165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02752489,0.000718132,0.001250375,0.002766755,0.001702195,0.004085958,0.003147843,0.004405754,0.011916695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16335554,0.0004932482,0.0011351602,0.0017193527,0.0043021855,0.005597556,0.0015615469,0.00929007,0.00309153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036202386,0.000061058876,0.00057003443,0.001273082,0.00009830998,0.0006279618,0.00073271146,0.0018648192,0.00038927578,0.15214631,0.7975544,0.044320066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013026294,0.00009453109,0.0013578733,0.0010297918,0.00011419527,0.0005597602,0.00040775628,0.010178385,0.0014760072,0.19132368,0.79320437,0.00012342002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003862916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036571021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02752489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026010566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037904978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14556724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121488803","doi":"10.1007/s10683-006-1467-1","title":"An experimental examination of the house money effect in a multi-period setting","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":153,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Cash; Monetary economics; Endowment; Period (music); Money market; Endowment effect; Microeconomics; Monetary policy; Finance","score_opus":0.05563209705592237,"score_gpt":0.3709444316091812,"score_spread":0.31531233455325886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121488803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976313,0.00004808479,0.0008599224,0.00006182641,0.00003376885,0.000103662846,0.000046768153,0.000011327309,0.0012032839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957001,0.000055580742,0.002677822,0.000097824864,0.000038441354,0.00047482393,0.00004472845,0.000011265464,0.00089941814],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977545,0.0011776965,0.00019488152,0.00040791323,0.0003125695,0.00015251954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686465,0.022653807,0.004143074,0.0031424006,0.0004892169,0.0009248703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030928277,0.00059670437,0.00077641616,0.0002796137,0.000534742,0.001065499,0.00091018877,0.0009500653,0.005583477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019168785,0.00054923544,0.0003051682,0.00025940323,0.0010213538,0.0008995137,0.001013084,0.0012624916,0.00031493386],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.1282378,0.19079296,0.05187773,0.0020640022,0.0011412501,0.0010704645,0.0054204958,0.010839658,0.48569167,0.023899186,0.0020115091,0.096953265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03370586,0.37155652,0.30642518,0.0003874095,0.0015299658,0.0009208181,0.0016790669,0.05612471,0.1724723,0.043578107,0.010988715,0.0006313644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037310584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034271515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005583477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003898526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035436166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018678546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121500403","doi":"","title":"Efficient and Non-Deteriorating Choice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalizability; Generalization; Preference; Choice function; Status quo; Mathematical economics; Revealed preference; Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Selection (genetic algorithm); Mathematics; Choice set; Domain (mathematical analysis); Economics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Nash equilibrium; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.15019257303669334,"score_gpt":0.43092029617688643,"score_spread":0.2807277231401931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121500403","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42634228,0.00026730867,0.5545676,0.0009883929,0.000021020081,0.00017660746,0.00009703444,0.0001012427,0.017438509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95871955,0.00011278605,0.038668048,0.00007195832,0.000023589351,0.00015565587,0.00006341947,0.000019035624,0.0021660116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906096,0.005742518,0.00048192148,0.0010571242,0.0015309381,0.0005778706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785123,0.011615454,0.0037208945,0.003303967,0.002081744,0.00076564023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010868674,0.00063867867,0.0009850312,0.0010383758,0.00076922367,0.002337102,0.00094218005,0.0010995043,0.0028511283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025264503,0.00032830716,0.0009608512,0.00093724625,0.0046443297,0.0034357782,0.0019258774,0.0018367445,0.00030781142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013946342,0.000092030285,0.0026248735,0.0000789908,0.00008449169,0.00013070091,0.0006212539,0.07256819,0.001970186,0.9040671,0.0004477375,0.017174995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043828575,0.00012848612,0.0015262492,0.00003846783,0.000026748521,0.00006387014,0.00018583734,0.2094649,0.0011047737,0.78609896,0.0012971874,0.00002070116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062744843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041922327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010868674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017785718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008443322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05747968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121513386","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v12n2p1","title":"Does Reminding of Behavioural Biases Increase Returns from Financial Trading? A Field Experiment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio; Incentive; Status quo; Psychological intervention; Set (abstract data type); Status quo bias; Economics; Behavioral economics; Finance; Business; Psychology; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.14843089232090467,"score_gpt":0.35754879132001105,"score_spread":0.20911789899910638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121513386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961616,0.00005994782,0.00058335,0.00026273003,0.0001294879,0.0012887747,0.00016438404,0.00003003023,0.0013196843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97998846,0.00020615137,0.0054379734,0.001144299,0.00022131688,0.006835026,0.0002640901,0.000017945918,0.005884712],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823976,0.0008249508,0.00011949733,0.00037585996,0.00017946906,0.00026053912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856514,0.008830072,0.0018138646,0.0014269447,0.00034108313,0.0019366596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056803753,0.00096815947,0.0010685138,0.0003180423,0.0008901512,0.0011382462,0.0013734343,0.0027196284,0.013594199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010027175,0.00070804876,0.0008143147,0.00022597433,0.0017196719,0.0009773294,0.00087564794,0.0029211754,0.0012984879],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.20526586,0.69625115,0.012798993,0.0013581954,0.0004340453,0.0002781341,0.002232537,0.0011237469,0.03585182,0.0018517649,0.0028594243,0.039694294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07081456,0.85662585,0.043357585,0.00030892482,0.0008933198,0.00016443692,0.00085162395,0.0042343005,0.0128999045,0.0045365505,0.005153654,0.00015928534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006807253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005541653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013594199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000371919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009170627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045477152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121584422","doi":"","title":"Applying Behavioral Economics to Public Policy in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Behavioral economics; Government (linguistics); Behavioural economics; Public policy; Public economics; Field (mathematics); Economics; Point (geometry); Behavioural sciences; Developing country; Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Social science; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07068466798682037,"score_gpt":0.35615136113545387,"score_spread":0.2854666931486335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121584422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30696157,0.019471027,0.037310813,0.18754283,0.0007753013,0.00084791327,0.005080176,0.00037583747,0.44163465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.949215,0.009098252,0.012956647,0.00345026,0.0000751294,0.00013552018,0.0005874603,0.00005254605,0.024429148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957502,0.001333219,0.00011297732,0.00034107204,0.0010368854,0.0014256301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99332726,0.0029834574,0.00034934012,0.0002828053,0.0020861893,0.00097097066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00571711,0.00058116147,0.0008030725,0.0025437628,0.008258578,0.007970289,0.002062664,0.0019063987,0.0064098528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013966062,0.00049874716,0.0009557005,0.006348865,0.006116366,0.0023712048,0.0026970266,0.0029042608,0.00024354056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007798153,0.00009625504,0.021537162,0.00020080413,0.00008006022,0.0002415519,0.0036565766,0.042353284,0.00015985793,0.86322314,0.027650904,0.04072251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016105942,0.00009892942,0.057477858,0.0008796427,0.00022493771,0.000102080194,0.01962148,0.16698764,0.00075649295,0.42215648,0.33114675,0.0003866294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99778783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2844473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2844473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29133502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8299397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121722981","doi":"10.1007/s11238-017-9612-1","title":"Confidence biases and learning among intuitive Bayesians","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Overconfidence effect; Contrarian; Bayesian probability; Task (project management); Perception; Conservatism; Phenomenon; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Probabilistic logic; Psychology; Machine learning; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.05195641067456367,"score_gpt":0.31595005995896197,"score_spread":0.2639936492843983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121722981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54024714,0.001797602,0.43267947,0.00781484,0.00018158338,0.00010400076,0.00031748597,0.0003019556,0.01655592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640951,0.0007338124,0.03132899,0.000648079,0.00025786425,0.00009064238,0.00018244551,0.000065333545,0.0025976812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938074,0.0032309967,0.00039229498,0.0011363134,0.001008904,0.00042413906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76969194,0.2056921,0.008937603,0.008377869,0.0055746324,0.0017258077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01688564,0.0005434733,0.0013508217,0.0015467642,0.0009207982,0.0050986065,0.0018070964,0.0026389093,0.004481131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21232979,0.0012681204,0.0012887655,0.0012083269,0.0040531214,0.011263131,0.0028045666,0.0042469096,0.0004318305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006777308,0.0001240722,0.014756545,0.000394748,0.0003582938,0.00016752102,0.0018286223,0.050055575,0.0011603129,0.84495646,0.0023972825,0.08312277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039298262,0.000027097874,0.0020103862,0.000026212663,0.00003463756,0.00004888766,0.000062493105,0.04410928,0.00024373556,0.9528835,0.0004909684,0.000023538014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019450809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016906849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01688564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016693837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094203633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08930087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121876819","doi":"","title":"Measuring the Output and Prices of the Lottery Sector: An Application of Implicit Expected Utility Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Economics; Index (typography); Econometrics; Parametric statistics; Price index; Yield (engineering); Microeconomics; Marginal utility; Expected utility hypothesis; Metric (unit); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Operations management","score_opus":0.6108723953484728,"score_gpt":0.5283074552787898,"score_spread":0.08256494006968307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121876819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72081816,0.00016139778,0.266507,0.00023372751,0.000017852526,0.00017462963,0.00089957676,0.00008223259,0.011105377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818547,0.00004844215,0.016916152,0.000008506457,0.000004232897,0.000046402438,0.0003497828,0.000009805178,0.0007619356],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983663,0.00082305813,0.000063377265,0.00018983513,0.00042866872,0.000128706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929605,0.0045980755,0.0010086934,0.0005161026,0.00075593946,0.00016063784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032800962,0.00052169245,0.00061397726,0.0011470345,0.0003438711,0.0018453063,0.0012691983,0.0005197003,0.002917005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020175057,0.00024890673,0.00051989895,0.0020230159,0.0010704446,0.002500902,0.0012319771,0.00090270507,0.00028600972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086761476,0.00068831013,0.28862557,0.0004532368,0.00047333897,0.00035037994,0.0016590465,0.38157186,0.003809328,0.20402917,0.0016059849,0.11586618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051193958,0.00037667344,0.1195726,0.00006456297,0.00008092513,0.00012168755,0.0010355266,0.7438627,0.004288031,0.12787397,0.0025359725,0.00013611007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017459525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015100296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017459525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023828787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013593212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03471577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122068380","doi":"10.1509/jmkr.47.6.1070","title":"Can Uncertainty Improve Promotions?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Marketing; Business; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.22681476193033015,"score_gpt":0.504219783122352,"score_spread":0.27740502119202193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122068380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38191476,0.08736521,0.042768765,0.15126516,0.00462873,0.0005571147,0.000828256,0.0005875918,0.3300844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97076404,0.014250002,0.004593554,0.0032648188,0.0014899219,0.00009805204,0.00011410567,0.000037945207,0.005387568],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994712,0.0029959108,0.00015892691,0.00039209359,0.0010405921,0.00070045574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776328,0.016312115,0.0023822596,0.00088128616,0.0012721467,0.0015193503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008905545,0.0008020316,0.0008079257,0.0011366192,0.0016040227,0.004828058,0.0010165413,0.0023936124,0.014472798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04451005,0.00040328313,0.0010928208,0.0009021135,0.0022200223,0.006784413,0.0027856273,0.0024803872,0.0021729893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034971875,0.0035980993,0.048201274,0.0037637767,0.0005164807,0.0007943868,0.0053899656,0.0099147605,0.0021626323,0.1342482,0.028628131,0.75928515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000716944,0.006127095,0.087790966,0.0045354236,0.0011790438,0.0015226721,0.010893163,0.013392914,0.003826428,0.68168724,0.18797559,0.00035255798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023175087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027835788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014472798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014051127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024348637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048416376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122152317","doi":"10.3386/w18820","title":"Estimating the Effect of Salience in Wholesale and Retail Car Markets","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Salience (neuroscience); Commerce; Econometrics; Industrial organization; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.4918722551205483,"score_gpt":0.5852813668369244,"score_spread":0.09340911171637617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122152317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99742776,0.000045443776,0.0016049577,0.00007117316,0.0000038968315,0.000027268698,0.00009438665,0.000008704809,0.0007163564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985663,0.000017948247,0.0010199253,0.000018201896,0.00000609081,0.000014165097,0.00017266795,0.0000030867225,0.00018156014],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758625,0.0012369098,0.00013186962,0.00048029431,0.00028741098,0.00027724655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91401416,0.07355638,0.007569274,0.0024897575,0.0011135353,0.0012568778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005775338,0.00042040367,0.0008589305,0.000973688,0.00050064834,0.0021163004,0.000997523,0.00129249,0.004433645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051291537,0.0005181027,0.0009492881,0.0009865687,0.0010073838,0.0026535098,0.0015973785,0.0019721743,0.00037913292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001924909,0.001606083,0.9512676,0.00010010907,0.00028965506,0.000233666,0.0007573847,0.01679718,0.0030639,0.005072928,0.00059737824,0.018289156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002672728,0.0011631228,0.84089667,0.000022623315,0.0002850616,0.000116517665,0.0015556149,0.14463504,0.0029441533,0.0071357246,0.0009212925,0.000056916357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012669303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008382748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012669303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008821599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006124691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030543268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122159922","doi":"","title":"Conditional Expected Utility","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Subjective expected utility; Expected utility hypothesis; Axiom; Preference; Mathematical economics; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Class (philosophy); Conditional probability; Separable space; Decision theory; Axiom independence; Event (particle physics); Invariant (physics); Mathematics; Representation (politics); Utility theory; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.21464586941068373,"score_gpt":0.45608154072341,"score_spread":0.24143567131272628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122159922","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046970475,0.0014917682,0.80899596,0.0032908507,0.00020230556,0.00012819542,0.0013487019,0.00022361516,0.13734807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.894902,0.0012208119,0.076823026,0.000520338,0.00023672602,0.00021478308,0.0009712961,0.00006465893,0.025046358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975128,0.0009203457,0.00012107717,0.00051845756,0.0006185601,0.0003087347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99676174,0.0014661084,0.0003115027,0.0006833204,0.0004952816,0.0002820832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029295553,0.00096190686,0.00082263723,0.0011433772,0.0006859988,0.003853077,0.0015709095,0.0012205399,0.011239568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009526885,0.00027653098,0.00086147134,0.0013810976,0.002273241,0.005359487,0.0016773408,0.0021589582,0.0012815497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002282188,0.000020779718,0.0005267145,0.00003325705,0.000021189724,0.00005186611,0.00007239083,0.0027839001,0.00019652082,0.9838293,0.0013566533,0.01108461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000953668,0.000026062451,0.0005312359,0.000030429437,0.000015287624,0.00011526995,0.00005018115,0.019020176,0.00025818098,0.9706659,0.009261777,0.000016025646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013511877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008646688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011239568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018026138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074404594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03760004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122501643","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2017.11.009","title":"Belief updating and the demand for information","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Stanford University","keywords":"Certainty; Value of information; Value (mathematics); Explanatory power; Subjective expected utility; Quality (philosophy); Information quality; Yield (engineering); Aptitude; Econometrics; Psychology; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Information system; Mathematics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.07985142296356297,"score_gpt":0.3751320584919505,"score_spread":0.29528063552838757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122501643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7796332,0.0024173637,0.17163901,0.013868665,0.00012611634,0.00009559317,0.0005411878,0.00010585812,0.031572927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99153215,0.0005547679,0.005763719,0.00017808453,0.000061868086,0.00003649646,0.00009011056,0.00001522807,0.0017675472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997118,0.0016063463,0.00016727191,0.00033207698,0.0004229911,0.0003533566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90464026,0.08336465,0.0050860997,0.0030335765,0.00254683,0.0013285553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005608933,0.0006624067,0.001247015,0.0011472725,0.0005853592,0.0047308514,0.0011796982,0.0031027277,0.006572352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06846691,0.0008285026,0.0006808878,0.0012714833,0.002607242,0.007017216,0.0012326527,0.002929512,0.00037791935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009273363,0.00041252814,0.016688837,0.00040574148,0.00030347725,0.00047174055,0.0013301512,0.08427963,0.0022627015,0.8510477,0.0017954079,0.040074762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001178627,0.00011310223,0.0072558387,0.000050019848,0.000077592784,0.00014768216,0.0003200083,0.16092452,0.00037008937,0.8297132,0.0008537783,0.000056375917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041724034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003137118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006572352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021282772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010961174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029663205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122592429","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00640.x","title":"A Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econometrica","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1948,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca","keywords":"Ambiguity; Decision-making models; Mathematical economics; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.21576175321837493,"score_gpt":0.41759901682382844,"score_spread":0.2018372636054535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122592429","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115152374,0.000837692,0.84140515,0.003085883,0.00008478085,0.00011089082,0.00044337683,0.0003065861,0.038573317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9163093,0.0007996639,0.0623178,0.00035045698,0.000118782256,0.000177021,0.00020005328,0.000050305025,0.019676711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980726,0.0007231516,0.0000663275,0.0003455263,0.000497021,0.00029536735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974439,0.0013327048,0.0004805547,0.0002440015,0.00021357539,0.000285197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027129736,0.0010858715,0.0011429529,0.0012337145,0.0007222243,0.0029692745,0.0018255623,0.0021807058,0.0055679786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061481535,0.0006512959,0.0013119377,0.0014764428,0.002765988,0.003736728,0.0022091633,0.0023742036,0.0011163194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052557036,0.000037532387,0.00041945724,0.00004465071,0.000032954784,0.00020130287,0.00021337203,0.12858915,0.00079777435,0.86334676,0.0005936009,0.00567079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034623008,0.00006301432,0.00021552632,0.000013046967,0.000017101098,0.000053437703,0.00004510204,0.2846526,0.00015785576,0.7126078,0.0021186743,0.000021211761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022821927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014236328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055679786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017224614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013045924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01862669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122664019","doi":"10.1257/app.20170048","title":"Do Risk Preferences Change? Evidence from the Great East Japan Earthquake","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Applied Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":325,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Natural disaster; Seismology; Geography; Geology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.1746640953632861,"score_gpt":0.3562616397659082,"score_spread":0.1815975444026221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122664019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957064,0.00072109594,0.00006396015,0.0010453507,0.000014115142,0.000003832876,0.00039083627,0.0000017565665,0.0020526496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984059,0.00057873846,0.000039566174,0.00024568167,0.000023987548,0.0000036400374,0.00036289284,0.0000015362509,0.00033816384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999421,0.00024717298,0.000051655006,0.000102649414,0.000076490476,0.00010098871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875339,0.0044230153,0.005572042,0.0009606818,0.00064065616,0.00086966524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015179595,0.00016219143,0.00030407478,0.00048397455,0.0003743143,0.000939107,0.00048089641,0.00085943687,0.0053724893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009598512,0.00022809615,0.00033840098,0.0010429362,0.00074979005,0.00072480645,0.0006999779,0.0009297932,0.00068002724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013034362,0.00031105638,0.97430676,0.00013233405,0.00038449882,0.00029457558,0.0018924722,0.000288913,0.00035407575,0.0006220562,0.0017646292,0.01834525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001864904,0.000053162355,0.9981014,0.000010999145,0.000041638883,0.00003702249,0.0007174814,0.00008109639,0.000037605256,0.00028866116,0.00060561055,0.0000066421294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012565634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013621425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012565634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023547951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017861415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024985015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122672574","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2016.2539","title":"When Do People Prefer Carrots to Sticks? A Robust “Matching Effect” in Policy Evaluation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Framing effect; Deliberation; Social psychology; Public economics; Psychology; Marketing; Public relations; Political science; Economics; Business; Persuasion; Engineering; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.10867624145138219,"score_gpt":0.4212578164481191,"score_spread":0.3125815749967369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122672574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7614357,0.0045577902,0.08528826,0.019689457,0.0006668411,0.0011072394,0.00047737453,0.00024184736,0.12653564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98721874,0.00040894063,0.008292868,0.0021867119,0.000085882755,0.00024281832,0.00006426159,0.000034226534,0.001465515],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.961888,0.026155252,0.0014628685,0.0041724606,0.0052350927,0.0010862659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85878783,0.11206234,0.015246965,0.008967197,0.0034651768,0.0014704306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04824708,0.0005607551,0.0012058205,0.0013331947,0.0018350842,0.004661086,0.00077806,0.0040773787,0.016410982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20817314,0.00055192335,0.0013743194,0.0014929147,0.00444641,0.0071314895,0.0019278426,0.0031507593,0.0013732899],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012027593,0.0025007217,0.20508672,0.002779344,0.0022898898,0.0005442683,0.011383031,0.007407607,0.007417712,0.27420893,0.013303081,0.4610511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014243933,0.0035245616,0.2707061,0.001575539,0.0016512751,0.00041335536,0.008941099,0.024660736,0.0074765976,0.6460918,0.033118784,0.0004157238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022794334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023160218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04824708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015585441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011004978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.255158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122782278","doi":"","title":"Loss Aversion in Financial Markets","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Loss aversion; Financial market; Risk aversion (psychology); Economics; Asset (computer security); Behavioral economics; Financial economics; Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Finance; Expected utility hypothesis","score_opus":0.025904207709719462,"score_gpt":0.32481067836933963,"score_spread":0.29890647065962017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122782278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4859705,0.014811586,0.21802537,0.02080564,0.0006308077,0.00026502926,0.00028260553,0.00020308545,0.25900534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98712474,0.0022557536,0.00489168,0.0010140094,0.0002726474,0.000059680755,0.000028284263,0.000009549249,0.0043435865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998156,0.0008579481,0.000078843834,0.00024868286,0.00045322368,0.00020518345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99134916,0.0056987894,0.0013435163,0.0005567594,0.0005903824,0.00046132554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046182093,0.0004935222,0.00069411856,0.00066024414,0.000652103,0.0025328104,0.0005521946,0.0016129776,0.0055101993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01776861,0.00023366728,0.00048217547,0.00048701474,0.003728382,0.0028123574,0.0015912964,0.0029145053,0.00035212812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031468846,0.00027311902,0.011934013,0.00029110292,0.00013975732,0.0005023264,0.0015502482,0.009193558,0.0022025267,0.8925077,0.0041878647,0.076903164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005610074,0.00015082493,0.007515785,0.000075543794,0.00003705035,0.00038286418,0.0003165407,0.0073610526,0.0002492224,0.979151,0.0046670684,0.00003703198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066446344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027379344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055101993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008419152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045679073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024423718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123335834","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12368","title":"Auditing Complex Estimates: How Do Construal Level and Evidence Formatting Impact Auditors' Consideration of Inconsistent Evidence?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Skepticism; Accounting; Context (archaeology); Disk formatting; Psychology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.6477451642451761,"score_gpt":0.53674767082475,"score_spread":0.1109974934204262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123335834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9649597,0.0005696253,0.01646306,0.002177418,0.00007008563,0.00014571495,0.000059938437,0.00012972076,0.01542473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99449,0.00010702387,0.004887783,0.00016490203,0.000020877194,0.000038613343,0.00002126631,0.000034004057,0.00023562089],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95147336,0.03780007,0.0021187034,0.001832564,0.006038293,0.0007370988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.42624944,0.4788811,0.05718017,0.018306153,0.01603857,0.003344487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04952536,0.0003740052,0.0004685527,0.0013614006,0.0009702158,0.008897581,0.001007059,0.0017017,0.0046465234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36546293,0.00063624367,0.00044982778,0.0011271907,0.0034241895,0.0065392093,0.0027707168,0.002589794,0.00054730475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0072289924,0.0023484963,0.46295854,0.0022558707,0.00060491747,0.0008390809,0.11553401,0.010030699,0.03591053,0.058369085,0.00417659,0.29974324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010536867,0.003199934,0.68271387,0.002643696,0.0010967564,0.00087619264,0.050363503,0.031144248,0.029748298,0.17389439,0.022518134,0.00074719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012718247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011425186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04952536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002135515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015596955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2619183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123358931","doi":"10.1111/mafi.12027","title":"OPTIMAL INSURANCE DESIGN UNDER RANK‐DEPENDENT EXPECTED UTILITY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Finance","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Distortion (music); Isoelastic utility; Economics; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Function (biology); Deductible; Regular polygon; Rank (graph theory); Distortion function; Concave function; Econometrics; Computer science; Actuarial science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.17888993934591077,"score_gpt":0.3734268161444817,"score_spread":0.19453687679857093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123358931","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09874239,0.00087630324,0.8883058,0.0017166586,0.000048801652,0.00009537484,0.00013798938,0.000105719526,0.009971048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9296955,0.0006792167,0.06418983,0.00015031212,0.000054154534,0.00012153575,0.00009418445,0.00003677758,0.0049784794],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792755,0.0012521667,0.00006931142,0.00022340524,0.00027390828,0.000253624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99576485,0.0029275331,0.0005053121,0.00021052692,0.00033583923,0.00025597765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036702538,0.00074851856,0.0013284682,0.000545755,0.00028289558,0.0016279279,0.0010877697,0.0018281022,0.0027031782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010285904,0.0005959799,0.000645733,0.00046843995,0.0011386356,0.0019115428,0.0011595136,0.0010785233,0.00031285195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019571667,0.00012866172,0.00094656786,0.00014312901,0.000056601257,0.00023199918,0.00009994188,0.7350794,0.0015246709,0.24252178,0.0011180474,0.017953558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064596745,0.00010944144,0.0002367739,0.00001715248,0.000015382218,0.000053058466,0.000021524911,0.8917457,0.00042630808,0.10664999,0.00064233266,0.000017663406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013232997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071024714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036702538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001520709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014623633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019410431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123525914","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1443865","title":"Economic Incentives and Social Preferences: A Preference-Based Lucas Critique of Public Policy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Preference; Economics; Social preferences; Public economics; Public choice; Public policy; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.12360791166538662,"score_gpt":0.3879534530412645,"score_spread":0.26434554137587785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123525914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11306959,0.0068581016,0.2743434,0.23698871,0.0006201303,0.0001500351,0.0006123084,0.00012921235,0.36722836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711133,0.0024949647,0.010595174,0.0031520035,0.00087022583,0.00011643515,0.00005919923,0.000044794935,0.011553863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969969,0.0018334087,0.00007604147,0.00027614099,0.00052920333,0.00028832883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926167,0.005047371,0.00074245094,0.0006249822,0.00066006527,0.00030841705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005005506,0.0006258911,0.00097041315,0.0011693186,0.0014057202,0.0052143866,0.0013289264,0.004727232,0.010654622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018813614,0.0004215721,0.00081641943,0.0015968075,0.0074793883,0.006599331,0.001885549,0.0046745352,0.000725614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013627156,0.000011065008,0.00012020068,0.000022844293,0.00000778013,0.000016819107,0.00015025187,0.0019012293,0.000028412347,0.99428236,0.001205326,0.0022401677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012610723,0.0000026663809,0.00008316896,0.00000926036,0.0000029813107,0.0000052841287,0.000038587634,0.0019103994,0.000014391435,0.9963654,0.0015522391,0.0000030827664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003657229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00301513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010654622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036490108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022988357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03564328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123531672","doi":"10.1093/ej/uez054","title":"Nudge Versus Boost: Agency Dynamics Under Libertarian Paternalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Novelty; Economics; Dynamic inconsistency; Competence (human resources); Public economics; Agency (philosophy); Microeconomics; Order (exchange); Positive economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.10481147138127267,"score_gpt":0.37297665652252315,"score_spread":0.2681651851412505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123531672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40046117,0.0017006542,0.16508652,0.04784405,0.00023952473,0.00020246352,0.0006471975,0.00021169437,0.38360682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98696923,0.0002974536,0.004967056,0.0005411454,0.000059898102,0.000046057798,0.000022747377,0.000018690402,0.007077764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720097,0.0013378406,0.00007279129,0.00042647327,0.00029338946,0.00066856225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911877,0.005108453,0.0014773582,0.0007671764,0.0005734754,0.0008859331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053427997,0.00031814174,0.0010000089,0.00050462445,0.0018501582,0.0042365454,0.0010276262,0.0030779615,0.015980642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01439737,0.0003763793,0.0009658014,0.0004889558,0.0048176036,0.0035974565,0.002504528,0.0036304232,0.0009416635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006813437,0.00003585936,0.0010610415,0.000025322151,0.000014177954,0.0001319076,0.00033805153,0.0068804487,0.0002958948,0.98687553,0.0018524042,0.0024211756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007779252,0.000031627307,0.0011759452,0.000028333992,0.0000131452025,0.00009087879,0.0003362995,0.052837748,0.00011389713,0.9412575,0.0040143714,0.000022478403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006224105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042879903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015980642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035831954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017773634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05346054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123605739","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2007.07.001","title":"The risk perceptions of individual investors","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; Universiteit van Tilburg; Northwestern University; Harvard University; Università degli Studi di Sassari; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Variance (accounting); Econometrics; Actuarial science; Benchmark (surveying); Bond; Risk measure; Financial economics; Market risk; Economics; Stock market; Stock (firearms); Portfolio; Finance","score_opus":0.15538970118702686,"score_gpt":0.4707797110751112,"score_spread":0.3153900098880843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123605739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997154,0.00010501513,0.00041937406,0.00017085219,0.000006009788,0.000003110291,0.000011825327,0.0000015485529,0.0021281948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957806,0.000067335415,0.00009708884,0.000028587958,0.0000055311302,0.0000012882622,0.000008077319,6.1722835e-7,0.00021343472],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950874,0.00021122862,0.000027401607,0.000039844548,0.00015367386,0.000059055026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99433714,0.0032729926,0.0012243881,0.00022241875,0.00043838366,0.000504719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013005857,0.00015779877,0.00019133039,0.00031825676,0.00017784617,0.0014082158,0.000120848716,0.000528728,0.0016905939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012115843,0.00013169003,0.00019121148,0.000204808,0.00037161369,0.00071749004,0.00037847026,0.00055965676,0.00019550741],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016930907,0.00066181435,0.88338083,0.00006975452,0.00044979277,0.0004266435,0.0067732474,0.006325945,0.009784238,0.007918188,0.0010889809,0.081427485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092474926,0.0009933814,0.9500583,0.00004252782,0.0002737385,0.0005452867,0.006643081,0.014829462,0.0030157662,0.021353718,0.0020694092,0.00008282209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074597495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007490355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016905939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020246931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014260254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006878257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123635459","doi":"","title":"When Does Feeling of Fluency Matter? How Abstract and Concrete Thinking Influence Fluency Effects","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fluency; Feeling; Processing fluency; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Priming (agriculture); Value (mathematics); Verbal fluency test; Social psychology; Computer science; Cognition; Neuropsychology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.03358314662971594,"score_gpt":0.3020886817453877,"score_spread":0.26850553511567177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123635459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990076,0.00021727322,0.0028269077,0.00033369998,0.000049782808,0.00003466995,0.00004942555,0.000029823559,0.0063824356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978021,0.0000952974,0.0013603114,0.00014033778,0.000030730636,0.000029889214,0.000039520342,0.000036708203,0.0004651306],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979569,0.000957206,0.00012496403,0.0003804386,0.00037217108,0.00020839607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96969664,0.023828361,0.003060296,0.0014237645,0.0006566615,0.0013342319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003012922,0.00039313798,0.0005966591,0.00047192277,0.00034810975,0.0023217273,0.0003166572,0.0011527401,0.0048271874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028809616,0.00038193347,0.00045471083,0.00027617396,0.0015192709,0.002298883,0.0008389482,0.0011642805,0.00043278307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025636919,0.0045889425,0.33632377,0.0019163211,0.0011006951,0.0013427805,0.02739857,0.0029859492,0.35239115,0.024076894,0.0024352893,0.2198027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073307694,0.0032178164,0.9211826,0.00018732213,0.0006292006,0.0005074608,0.0028052605,0.003463362,0.02291064,0.041618034,0.0025417893,0.00020346233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043890724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033547037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048271874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003652758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022259861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016148627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123676357","doi":"10.1037/a0016074","title":"Immediacy bias in emotion perception: Current emotions seem more intense than previous emotions.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Immediacy; Psychology; Perception; Salience (neuroscience); Emotion perception; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Attentional bias; Cognition","score_opus":0.22361745299687172,"score_gpt":0.5006723849807303,"score_spread":0.27705493198385855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123676357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814937,0.0009830983,0.0065257973,0.0002673967,0.000117706906,0.00005801486,0.00011229358,0.000049644983,0.010392371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957503,0.00024852774,0.0027564967,0.00030458884,0.00006707309,0.000048711674,0.00008471518,0.000024639305,0.00071482296],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889874,0.0002902048,0.00008839747,0.00026748792,0.0004078268,0.00004737942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892781,0.0066620675,0.0022144367,0.0008653266,0.00063711824,0.00034310736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022246873,0.00024283267,0.00023350601,0.00044033251,0.0002409689,0.0009915546,0.00018378651,0.0004463396,0.0032055108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018018782,0.00023991002,0.00025463154,0.00024114104,0.0005596085,0.0010607818,0.00095215003,0.0009204368,0.00025160768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008256531,0.0007606581,0.2756924,0.001561535,0.00077338575,0.00046195203,0.010114589,0.00065778266,0.5534569,0.0053938455,0.001885664,0.1409847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012401844,0.0007101728,0.96743226,0.00009363412,0.00016409965,0.0009241083,0.001365472,0.00093729136,0.022253305,0.0037371425,0.0021955841,0.00006282941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034064444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065494684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032055108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023967042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011986173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01176542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123771500","doi":"","title":"Physical Contact and Financial Risk Taking","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Handshake; Social psychology; Psychology; Physical security; Financial risk; Risk perception; Actuarial science; Business; Computer security; Computer science; Perception","score_opus":0.037261389995646224,"score_gpt":0.35924727547542235,"score_spread":0.32198588547977613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123771500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99169546,0.00030127243,0.0008334009,0.00024913295,0.0000107786955,0.000016410599,0.000022993605,0.0000034297002,0.0068671736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99902785,0.00010145133,0.00031180057,0.000036985395,0.0000074630684,0.000011021562,0.000009617359,7.0987744e-7,0.00049302174],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923146,0.00039784654,0.0000390305,0.00009084683,0.0001509783,0.000089881294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920121,0.0043335496,0.0025630796,0.0003684123,0.00014122478,0.00058161543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096725865,0.00034139413,0.00023124901,0.00028484446,0.0004969588,0.0012068937,0.00019337794,0.00068922294,0.011308768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072963755,0.00011769128,0.0002764279,0.00017267757,0.0006673771,0.00062051666,0.0010809504,0.00066875905,0.00042162894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003978287,0.009231139,0.7243629,0.00113965,0.0005774906,0.0025353017,0.011445361,0.0021713024,0.034081396,0.02067193,0.0013614943,0.18844372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016464818,0.005116765,0.95037687,0.00020080447,0.00027089517,0.0021851046,0.0049103354,0.0041239685,0.0070359446,0.0208143,0.004699943,0.00010026879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035861265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000419325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011308768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021138575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001883643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037831545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123794477","doi":"","title":"The Income Effect under Uncertainty: a Slutsky-Like Decomposition with Risk Aversion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Separable space; Economics; Decomposition; Econometrics; Risk aversion (psychology); Representation (politics); Microeconomics; Mathematics; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical economics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05411818427398222,"score_gpt":0.4017375702321382,"score_spread":0.34761938595815595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123794477","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34965354,0.001617677,0.5959363,0.0025016416,0.00015759016,0.00008175795,0.0002663991,0.000114954855,0.04967014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97097856,0.0009426625,0.022815611,0.000155474,0.00008428985,0.000059825947,0.000058189373,0.000049961287,0.004855473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992119,0.00034997295,0.000027046663,0.000112564994,0.00014450365,0.00015404177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997024,0.0018603167,0.0004831637,0.00026679042,0.00016360509,0.00020204014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026902386,0.00061159936,0.00084943586,0.000985472,0.00045743538,0.0024036646,0.00080353825,0.00095927564,0.006355432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008438314,0.00030570372,0.0014755813,0.00088745274,0.0017816416,0.0034746854,0.0015109084,0.0018084575,0.00033049125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009187727,0.00007496201,0.0009703447,0.000121992096,0.0000686707,0.00017191342,0.00018884164,0.066234335,0.0020347727,0.9142854,0.0008807345,0.014876107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024238623,0.00007397345,0.0014824024,0.0000451465,0.00004959711,0.00007561308,0.000094239855,0.21195185,0.00059394946,0.784803,0.00077374425,0.000032283835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010962104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050473394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006355432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011084629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006276802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021261036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123875623","doi":"","title":"Expected utility without full transitivity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Economics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.1364512198960772,"score_gpt":0.39465415593691483,"score_spread":0.25820293604083766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123875623","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028407566,0.0003137233,0.9504189,0.0014413362,0.00015081474,0.000090541296,0.0002814164,0.00022499295,0.018670626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6936368,0.0005299839,0.2911986,0.0008312237,0.00037924113,0.00032763186,0.0005799969,0.00022945972,0.012287115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99297416,0.0030819539,0.00055197295,0.0013132519,0.0015717784,0.00050695764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821323,0.009135047,0.001308537,0.0037537257,0.0029468853,0.0007234016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01027678,0.0008657413,0.0011247445,0.002054635,0.0010672723,0.0030056546,0.00258396,0.0013465061,0.0056811427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023811758,0.0006366792,0.0016257456,0.0016426062,0.0036728142,0.008818779,0.0034217609,0.003333035,0.0010095667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028497843,0.000039468185,0.0003815643,0.00007384916,0.000033001474,0.00006466597,0.00007959088,0.0039055643,0.000596312,0.9822504,0.0010079065,0.011539219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016576645,0.00005559695,0.00028620832,0.000027424834,0.000017681357,0.00009940743,0.0000310379,0.035078492,0.0011093296,0.9589625,0.0042915763,0.000024079942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008750203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011984331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01027678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018673189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020459974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054349482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123929703","doi":"10.26481/umamet.2012026","title":"Single-Plateaued Choice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Universiteit Maastricht","keywords":"Convexity; Matching (statistics); Mathematical economics; Property (philosophy); Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Independence (probability theory); Voting; Term (time); Interval (graph theory); Mathematics; Economics; Econometrics; Social choice theory; Combinatorics; Statistics; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.05848906986529711,"score_gpt":0.2673358534192914,"score_spread":0.20884678355399428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123929703","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20810318,0.0006100586,0.721812,0.0011452233,0.00009083023,0.00019764813,0.0005633337,0.00019161594,0.067286104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9174093,0.00018426575,0.07513464,0.00020726882,0.000045061963,0.0001277771,0.00019426552,0.000037070673,0.006660397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969682,0.0011355504,0.00017150954,0.00084764184,0.000610328,0.00026683812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930387,0.0033359404,0.00061667984,0.0015513527,0.0008549819,0.0006024935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00401497,0.00040882826,0.00076830975,0.0006891142,0.00076891,0.002888327,0.00138961,0.0011883372,0.009341741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011855366,0.00034265945,0.001232314,0.0009908689,0.0031571111,0.005080524,0.0023083943,0.0023509187,0.00078185834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013172744,0.00006453928,0.0015532171,0.00010997741,0.00006283811,0.00023461555,0.00035500294,0.007362304,0.0017055556,0.95464253,0.0009886117,0.032789066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029040328,0.00009691322,0.00067853386,0.000029845498,0.000014930485,0.00023647396,0.00012667973,0.028374681,0.0007097918,0.96612877,0.0035539768,0.00002044443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037620869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045154087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009341741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011079642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069120515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03125125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123962758","doi":"10.1002/bdm.735","title":"Effects of Spikes in the Price of Gasoline on Behavioral Intentions: A Mental Accounting Explanation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Gallon (US); Mental accounting; Gasoline; Economics; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Public economics; Microeconomics; Psychology","score_opus":0.16415801977220304,"score_gpt":0.4335051786725509,"score_spread":0.2693471589003479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123962758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9837345,0.00008400398,0.003236055,0.0013295943,0.00003469142,0.00008241417,0.00010982243,0.00004345635,0.011345416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799925,0.00004467544,0.0012867975,0.00018595248,0.000011508746,0.00004491415,0.000046563684,0.000007606171,0.00037272784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986626,0.0007167598,0.00006677582,0.00017022915,0.00026544253,0.00011816442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715424,0.020267738,0.0038903167,0.0027621067,0.00085095793,0.00068649667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028105152,0.0004728835,0.00041150412,0.0005425207,0.0005399215,0.0021265948,0.00078733684,0.001777381,0.008070065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02781436,0.00043937296,0.0007613566,0.00033630934,0.001813073,0.0019757177,0.0017633706,0.0019703074,0.0003150537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0128659075,0.009800882,0.568129,0.0012088995,0.0010393296,0.0020854701,0.022180106,0.03189149,0.0786605,0.11300484,0.0051728976,0.1539606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076796924,0.0021296765,0.79198664,0.00014261997,0.00060450495,0.00042289458,0.005407398,0.08016322,0.008036457,0.107669555,0.0023554696,0.00031357148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039279694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024001547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008070065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009903027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004927816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02699703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124117302","doi":"10.3982/qe856","title":"Eliciting risk preferences using choice lists","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Lottery; Pairwise comparison; Incentive; Payment; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Finance","score_opus":0.2975611152905501,"score_gpt":0.45625722434889754,"score_spread":0.1586961090583474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124117302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97199494,0.00008401587,0.025402639,0.00016472365,0.000021093032,0.00012621733,0.00012927213,0.00014706329,0.0019301042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9690267,0.000140464,0.028422136,0.00015410382,0.000031205785,0.00023400722,0.00029359004,0.000029538985,0.0016683782],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961569,0.0026140057,0.00018040063,0.00028613635,0.00061340065,0.00014922484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91517216,0.07478405,0.004988271,0.0029793074,0.00099581,0.0010803768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004114319,0.0007554985,0.00057579426,0.00042669996,0.00026899556,0.0010656497,0.0006510833,0.0009197228,0.0065130787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029083153,0.0004095462,0.00032009985,0.00054854876,0.0005032979,0.002045509,0.0009780253,0.00085635914,0.0015170131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.026638439,0.019079706,0.07296459,0.0023448858,0.00054243766,0.0006293234,0.00473881,0.04046018,0.4300621,0.0278728,0.0041229962,0.3705437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051326924,0.033562098,0.10410488,0.00041997014,0.0005899337,0.00074308313,0.0023698856,0.40349507,0.35896015,0.07682801,0.013070652,0.0007235564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021148128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032714204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065130787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002464795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002844187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021788478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124191659","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2232","title":"Arithmetic computation with probability words and numbers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of National Defence; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Calculator; Computation; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Point (geometry); Computer science; Statistics; Probability distribution; Arithmetic; Percentage point; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.12452005511506391,"score_gpt":0.42987133092850005,"score_spread":0.30535127581343613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124191659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90155137,0.00054295594,0.075476274,0.00065097417,0.00009194581,0.000098374294,0.00016041382,0.00014333251,0.021284368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98176944,0.00011935575,0.017062163,0.00005866114,0.000029893023,0.000054900735,0.000071267306,0.000021923328,0.0008125429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973923,0.0013700286,0.00024893828,0.00035314268,0.000551772,0.000083766776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96588176,0.026604919,0.0039699282,0.0018572909,0.0012555462,0.0004305457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014905148,0.00038823189,0.00030864865,0.00077111245,0.00030385368,0.0027494037,0.0005462103,0.000458844,0.01013796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047779,0.00027387048,0.0003008268,0.0008597395,0.0015114617,0.0047329427,0.0014177961,0.0007503383,0.00069383753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036874816,0.0005750834,0.080959424,0.002202069,0.00025664974,0.0012399858,0.01995279,0.038401745,0.081099465,0.40832785,0.004189858,0.35910767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028204877,0.0009900323,0.094193004,0.000465266,0.00020233491,0.0013864702,0.003809985,0.11125523,0.028227549,0.7446689,0.014317459,0.00020177031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039021065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022329796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01013796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005246341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003546973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033914804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124199816","doi":"","title":"Reverse Bayesianism: A Generalization","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Generalization; Decision maker; State space; Null (SQL); Space (punctuation); Mathematical economics; State (computer science); Null hypothesis; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Econometrics; Epistemology; Operations research; Statistics; Algorithm; Data mining; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15511650417128026,"score_gpt":0.4421341610267307,"score_spread":0.28701765685545044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124199816","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034743544,0.001429623,0.8175473,0.008129612,0.00033517097,0.0001320521,0.00049413566,0.00031792995,0.13687053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8394529,0.0023537087,0.12801309,0.004165111,0.0014121187,0.00036218407,0.00048549456,0.00022786659,0.023527527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992607,0.0028103602,0.00037188907,0.0020105888,0.0016887573,0.00051143015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98043275,0.01132203,0.0016304102,0.0043334793,0.0017072422,0.0005740771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0085171,0.0008781516,0.0015003998,0.0013798644,0.0015858179,0.0035548054,0.002246472,0.0028119697,0.009299019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030271562,0.0008155968,0.002700498,0.0012872786,0.0047965166,0.008675527,0.004872113,0.0074494015,0.0015526792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019633162,0.000016545479,0.00041596062,0.00006287665,0.000031849933,0.000070719405,0.00020565915,0.003698789,0.0001944972,0.98401386,0.0010697602,0.010199782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010309968,0.0000083981395,0.00011324457,0.000013337676,0.000010502691,0.0000909472,0.000017921757,0.008033904,0.000056728844,0.9891622,0.002474782,0.000007800867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004189648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002404948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009299019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017363343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00146857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04504329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124297494","doi":"","title":"Calibration without Reduction for Non-Expected Utility","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Calibration; Risk aversion (psychology); Axiom; Econometrics; Reduction (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Decision maker; Economics; Class (philosophy); Prospect theory; Subjective expected utility; Computer science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Management science","score_opus":0.23375136064894944,"score_gpt":0.46792835420559836,"score_spread":0.23417699355664892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124297494","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045396872,0.0005507922,0.9043836,0.002516472,0.00019617369,0.00011081497,0.0003379911,0.00045922818,0.046048045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8523178,0.00083079346,0.12854765,0.0013903325,0.00029068268,0.00027537195,0.00054235,0.000322786,0.015482209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947448,0.0020614858,0.00027803,0.0011543245,0.0013699441,0.0003913487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819209,0.00954569,0.0013063452,0.0055038836,0.0014675161,0.00025577156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069366507,0.0010859594,0.0012718326,0.0012288099,0.00062834367,0.0026356983,0.0023240126,0.002355009,0.015098758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040725354,0.000815067,0.0025595718,0.0009192418,0.0028405571,0.008127814,0.0035702784,0.006237368,0.002314462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020889562,0.000036340745,0.00038805034,0.00005643286,0.000027993712,0.00004787792,0.00007571671,0.013166712,0.0004423067,0.97386914,0.0013116868,0.010556932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011935744,0.000013161625,0.00019588438,0.000014323234,0.000008827142,0.000046059093,0.000013878305,0.038732816,0.00037265552,0.95892656,0.0016500696,0.000013832494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005234655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003471475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015098758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019302901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010195854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050510347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124328514","doi":"10.2308/jmar-50726","title":"The Moderating Effect of Prior Sales Changes on Asymmetric Cost Behavior","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Accounting Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":322,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Phenomenon; Microeconomics; Empirical research; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.1771256799378747,"score_gpt":0.4798260455893569,"score_spread":0.3027003656514822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124328514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99522734,0.00010234188,0.0008519914,0.00032930862,0.000007933291,0.0000132875375,0.00015840186,0.00001702982,0.0032923908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994155,0.000029293615,0.00014735704,0.000021116732,0.000008229088,0.0000033457688,0.000055892142,0.000004148086,0.00031513072],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900573,0.00044497932,0.00006828217,0.00016571827,0.00018769944,0.00012771202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93767834,0.04330502,0.013098866,0.0027330117,0.001089261,0.0020955696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018819341,0.0002747686,0.0004061621,0.0005288593,0.00034819558,0.002006372,0.00039533578,0.0008180434,0.014188671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029238464,0.00020179071,0.00025775685,0.0004936457,0.0005228631,0.0009017448,0.0006628191,0.0011253249,0.00054416165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019404769,0.0012827006,0.9337834,0.00015667723,0.00028740146,0.00042532457,0.00078490307,0.009686729,0.008306653,0.0068500363,0.0011754008,0.03532027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043380944,0.00025822956,0.9805517,0.00002197452,0.00010997534,0.000075456315,0.0003767974,0.0124300765,0.0010766458,0.0042821197,0.0007437948,0.000029832438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035836163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003605343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014188671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006706719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043055357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04746586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124348298","doi":"","title":"Social Preference Under Twofold Uncertainty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Preference; Econometrics; Economics; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.3098558786591238,"score_gpt":0.4708694550469446,"score_spread":0.16101357638782082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124348298","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26168022,0.0016300015,0.5299103,0.017643234,0.00027936464,0.000092445836,0.00033430662,0.000078070465,0.18835203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772151,0.00043586397,0.016512638,0.00033214674,0.0001726247,0.00007221945,0.00005530671,0.000016173151,0.0051877326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940317,0.0037687756,0.00018127442,0.00053919276,0.0010491784,0.00042975775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914499,0.005706022,0.0010079741,0.0006887973,0.00076786615,0.00037945903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006330101,0.0005827944,0.0005863821,0.0010221915,0.0009897674,0.0042379918,0.0007740821,0.0019649896,0.0046551893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014210603,0.00021523182,0.0006895278,0.0010371775,0.004120179,0.0053126486,0.0026600598,0.0021715476,0.00040808084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021708245,0.000009419103,0.00017158156,0.000022721099,0.000012215431,0.000051053194,0.0001793265,0.0037558728,0.00013283172,0.99165076,0.00031674464,0.0036757619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007892706,0.000013470062,0.00014483629,0.000012959222,0.0000064519463,0.000029087956,0.00010886446,0.009541905,0.000092743496,0.9886884,0.0013468735,0.0000064283677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043477223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038020388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006330101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025579336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007729031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033477187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124621708","doi":"10.3390/risks4030029","title":"Optimal Insurance with Heterogeneous Beliefs and Disagreement about Zero-Probability Events","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risks","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; HEC Montréal; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Università Bocconi; Université de Montréal; Imperial College London; Georgia State University; Society of Actuaries","keywords":"Indemnity; Arrow; Actuarial science; Deductible; Mathematical economics; Probabilistic logic; Expected utility hypothesis; Monotone polygon; Incentive compatibility; Mathematics; Schedule; Econometrics; Economics; Statistics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Incentive","score_opus":0.1468276934601342,"score_gpt":0.38609035373552975,"score_spread":0.23926266027539556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124621708","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39810133,0.0013093611,0.57172984,0.0037824253,0.00007169982,0.00011308671,0.00029169742,0.000104456536,0.024496064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97241086,0.0003586989,0.024806572,0.00009933208,0.0000639263,0.00008041443,0.000060630384,0.00002089077,0.002098795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967487,0.0015741552,0.00015501736,0.0006138503,0.00050055655,0.0004076917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881622,0.008748896,0.0016001922,0.00065671187,0.00041734413,0.00041465985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057687596,0.0008231932,0.0012702843,0.0006468034,0.0007507431,0.0021128342,0.0013952844,0.0018129649,0.0022421768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021239214,0.0006301768,0.0008909689,0.0006998409,0.00305009,0.0040355525,0.0013947889,0.0025809335,0.00023453127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003129326,0.00012976646,0.0014187454,0.00011434357,0.000074754425,0.0001644526,0.00035671235,0.16169587,0.0015588974,0.8200802,0.0007353524,0.0133579485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092990536,0.00008350767,0.0008333373,0.000027884953,0.000018203287,0.000036430276,0.0000818458,0.18481945,0.000590628,0.8125041,0.000885073,0.000026544087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016716731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007708604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057687596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036255075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001214266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030508518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124661297","doi":"","title":"Risk aversion and framing effects","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Framing effect; Framing (construction); Normative; Stochastic game; Risk aversion (psychology); Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Loss aversion; Incentive; Econometrics; Salient; Microeconomics; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09101802287557806,"score_gpt":0.4149614283830361,"score_spread":0.32394340550745804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124661297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89919305,0.0011817554,0.033477403,0.0017895014,0.0001714225,0.00015818755,0.0001461799,0.00009412395,0.063788295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912719,0.00032579014,0.0063052196,0.00038382516,0.0000715041,0.000082134335,0.000054209773,0.000015394598,0.0014900625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970079,0.0015055222,0.0001277198,0.0003899551,0.0008061162,0.00016281751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96283495,0.026556201,0.0047519356,0.0043429956,0.00083423214,0.00067966594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005858628,0.0007055935,0.00052753696,0.00067138055,0.000549901,0.001747389,0.000572754,0.0010878728,0.00976754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028815348,0.00032332024,0.0005402819,0.00037149485,0.0013417618,0.0014064675,0.001245138,0.0024815118,0.00045052363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006150293,0.0068550752,0.09277248,0.0018724494,0.00084343675,0.0011483539,0.008383401,0.013371097,0.14812785,0.35880867,0.005869137,0.3557978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014478961,0.007086682,0.19115719,0.00047510877,0.0011802247,0.0018553346,0.0020416612,0.031690814,0.05244749,0.68485457,0.02537375,0.00038923687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027037112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019469688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00976754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040786093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030288706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032675624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124673016","doi":"10.20955/wp.2011.030","title":"Markov-Perfect Risk Sharing, Moral Hazard and Limited Commitment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Moral hazard; Hazard; Markov chain; Computer science; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.22614275304126036,"score_gpt":0.38612912106509434,"score_spread":0.15998636802383398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124673016","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2277696,0.0004263108,0.76132476,0.0010766927,0.000054172386,0.00006480612,0.00020944026,0.000099882105,0.008974396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95223755,0.00023421877,0.044704348,0.00007499443,0.000027042603,0.00006509505,0.00007722344,0.000019774056,0.0025597904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985631,0.0005875214,0.00007394283,0.00023090756,0.00029120554,0.00025344544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99401903,0.0032829586,0.0012441438,0.00071040913,0.0002921885,0.00045130585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028037613,0.0007124328,0.0010867402,0.00053153373,0.0007142553,0.0020315284,0.0016088431,0.0017578286,0.0033173156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012967518,0.0007134587,0.0010781401,0.0007153197,0.002502943,0.003773884,0.00196438,0.0016607692,0.00023374369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051277548,0.00005537381,0.0010444645,0.000039140967,0.000028897255,0.00012327185,0.00009836866,0.32635117,0.0005173589,0.6666109,0.00039766068,0.004682126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023076214,0.000024267461,0.00023210417,0.000017092912,0.000008654538,0.00003796466,0.000023427632,0.5988816,0.00024020733,0.40004733,0.00044922734,0.000015105647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032297033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023051065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033173156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019290927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025803628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0148278475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124717382","doi":"","title":"Possibility and permissibility","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Preference; Mathematical economics; Epistemology; Economics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.18607404405926312,"score_gpt":0.47086700489660793,"score_spread":0.28479296083734484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124717382","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047847357,0.0014999222,0.8153297,0.008527636,0.00051557395,0.00021876876,0.000317996,0.00031566038,0.1254274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77801466,0.0013569765,0.19746463,0.0018775354,0.0012320454,0.0006834502,0.00058602967,0.00024006072,0.01854462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98918414,0.0041696928,0.0007386581,0.0025979946,0.0025434368,0.0007660478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98387367,0.008799264,0.0012845567,0.0032800396,0.00203797,0.0007245743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009002799,0.0014200049,0.0012825339,0.0037101721,0.0031075235,0.0051554297,0.003104842,0.0041314797,0.010540538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027215973,0.0009265419,0.004101051,0.0025047173,0.012506295,0.016687622,0.007353403,0.009054948,0.0017556179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057173056,0.000008446729,0.000070332346,0.00001962098,0.000008991565,0.000031720716,0.00011448687,0.00045017916,0.0001240587,0.9964939,0.0003118312,0.0023607663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004589268,0.0000060499356,0.000026948252,0.000012631836,0.0000041019816,0.000056210523,0.000024310566,0.0012850475,0.00012335087,0.99677235,0.0016791794,0.0000052832734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007617485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057855115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010540538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024656185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018498279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04761195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124809987","doi":"","title":"Internal and External Validity of Experimental Risk and Time Preferences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"DukeSpace (Duke University)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hyperbolic discounting; Time preference; Preference; Payment; Discounting; Econometrics; Predictive power; Economics; Actuarial science; Cash; Risk aversion (psychology); Expected utility hypothesis; Microeconomics; Financial economics; Finance","score_opus":0.09968940756380147,"score_gpt":0.33251167640901713,"score_spread":0.23282226884521567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124809987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9658324,0.00015428363,0.015603559,0.00033935357,0.000020151674,0.00030412845,0.00093150855,0.000050500574,0.016764004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939779,0.000060444152,0.0033527366,0.00012596225,0.0000061671553,0.00020423689,0.0007323721,0.000025208627,0.0015148743],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848476,0.008423646,0.00064825325,0.0023536151,0.0030821306,0.0006446228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82721055,0.122011304,0.012948481,0.027311578,0.0089214165,0.0015967168],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029918632,0.0005636984,0.0005991763,0.0006327472,0.0012812512,0.0022743337,0.0014627018,0.0011292982,0.0039119055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12378153,0.00031195307,0.0007130859,0.0008816612,0.00539503,0.0011009711,0.001404542,0.0012512351,0.00042276573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0067555327,0.0026912442,0.75862455,0.000548646,0.0016079588,0.0004219706,0.010218376,0.057619546,0.014227912,0.06113788,0.0034562668,0.0826901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008429176,0.0010332075,0.85544217,0.00019145182,0.00038846477,0.00020659107,0.0035403853,0.07119295,0.011196441,0.044807408,0.010881488,0.00027650924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2823324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2392535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9700814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006429501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049694097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56137806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124888832","doi":"10.1037/a0030174","title":"Risk preferences and aging: The “Certainty Effect” in older adults’ decision making","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Europe PMC (PubMed Central)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Certainty; Psychology; Risk-seeking; Preference; Young adult; Loss aversion; Risk aversion (psychology); Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics","score_opus":0.04221512767164729,"score_gpt":0.31427425599255343,"score_spread":0.2720591283209061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124888832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933595,0.0011427549,0.0015627542,0.00033044437,0.000019098141,0.00001168726,0.00005444489,0.0000062490312,0.0035131401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985195,0.00028939935,0.0007108759,0.00011529597,0.00002115296,0.000006390568,0.00003101368,0.0000026090208,0.00030379192],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937457,0.00018802157,0.00005933109,0.00013534563,0.00019520689,0.0000474684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994511,0.002374464,0.0018582646,0.00047637694,0.0003115632,0.00046829955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002778818,0.00028794023,0.00031221044,0.0004158871,0.00022591422,0.0007850205,0.00016019854,0.0005900855,0.0024807032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0121859675,0.00024372153,0.00031986344,0.00021225255,0.0007410404,0.0012796303,0.0007949925,0.000852172,0.00014954421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038577304,0.0009135707,0.81698626,0.00047987132,0.00052950974,0.00063902565,0.009250672,0.0014745557,0.034770705,0.00931839,0.0009755172,0.12080418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041301184,0.00072142325,0.9859015,0.00005594971,0.00010429303,0.00046667957,0.00068593764,0.00097216055,0.001709384,0.008108485,0.0011903058,0.00004259398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093641307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015983408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002778818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020305897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019305167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014695942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124949042","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1883787","title":"Eliciting Risk Preferences: When is Simple Better?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1024320880113661,"score_gpt":0.3553509570677484,"score_spread":0.2529188690563823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124949042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9630537,0.0014499251,0.010481699,0.0056276293,0.000332459,0.00018284732,0.00027969864,0.00009113304,0.018500924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842189,0.0009979457,0.011480661,0.0012323783,0.00023368717,0.00008961361,0.00016941769,0.0000528231,0.0015245259],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635977,0.0014818958,0.00040155093,0.00039049698,0.0011429329,0.0002233348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96294403,0.022768902,0.006395278,0.004300518,0.0019686823,0.001622563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064714286,0.00053502835,0.0011478661,0.00064671127,0.00051417184,0.0033168318,0.00056786614,0.0017971258,0.013904041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05819724,0.0003512626,0.00080176187,0.00076532544,0.0011714849,0.0063480465,0.0016168369,0.0014117816,0.001441358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014688715,0.005293213,0.082564205,0.005281819,0.0014907286,0.00068464415,0.0049595414,0.007945531,0.06905226,0.059920814,0.014832506,0.733286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025612016,0.016337318,0.19989339,0.0016347041,0.0023166547,0.0014973317,0.007556823,0.027210973,0.034366418,0.6670818,0.038900513,0.00064291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047819765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011802241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013904041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006227265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067136873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046513617},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3124972983","doi":"","title":"2011: “External norms and rationality of choice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Rationalizability; Axiom; Rationality; Mathematical economics; Norm (philosophy); Preference theory; Mathematics; Preference; Economics; Microeconomics; Nash equilibrium; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14862552806644339,"score_gpt":0.39877225829112006,"score_spread":0.2501467302246767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124972983","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17816952,0.0036551878,0.4947621,0.06788563,0.0009096278,0.00015664175,0.0012000763,0.0003594815,0.25290173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96399254,0.0009889788,0.024492685,0.0014735304,0.00027606534,0.00013687929,0.00044106154,0.00006118971,0.008137097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157447,0.005010808,0.0005455222,0.00123381,0.0013376605,0.00029783946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814497,0.010397832,0.002167212,0.0032820906,0.0023309737,0.00037206852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011418367,0.00035313834,0.0005983861,0.0009573528,0.00087522005,0.0056922804,0.0007655337,0.0019864058,0.0073913652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028137041,0.00026959248,0.0004952975,0.0016739187,0.006257704,0.0073700487,0.0021587228,0.0025380647,0.0008269141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040039016,0.000013084447,0.00078034966,0.000044869033,0.000023943367,0.000022322227,0.0003243422,0.0011824591,0.00010516271,0.98578644,0.0027612618,0.008915788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017200411,0.000007788924,0.0005206679,0.000042700485,0.0000119305105,0.000021884236,0.00011557412,0.0051940256,0.00025444513,0.9855533,0.008250931,0.000009639919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002374992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013423356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011418367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025147721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017911735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060386837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125257997","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2556153","title":"Optimal Insurance for a Minimal Expected Retention: The Case of an Ambiguity-Seeking Insurer","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Actuarial science; Business; Econometrics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.13289612018130015,"score_gpt":0.39216338868589024,"score_spread":0.2592672685045901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125257997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79292715,0.0014373885,0.14560457,0.02434364,0.0002527151,0.00019310923,0.0011139982,0.00043207646,0.03369523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98889714,0.0002888045,0.004778672,0.00021754269,0.00014007662,0.00003290376,0.00007285052,0.000030412319,0.005541723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997652,0.0006182878,0.000106227635,0.0003560378,0.00023268638,0.001034764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98585826,0.008948353,0.0016424403,0.00060775573,0.00055881165,0.0023844063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005028877,0.001212705,0.0038063363,0.0014171117,0.0017474255,0.0044211834,0.0032045709,0.009043065,0.0075971535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021482771,0.0012080605,0.001436417,0.00082396617,0.0028359704,0.0036146373,0.0026425212,0.0033660736,0.00075406284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020812002,0.0010798711,0.0122462725,0.0006024189,0.00046236964,0.0079677915,0.0012163476,0.27262217,0.008370812,0.6526714,0.015188129,0.025491206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004814989,0.00052144256,0.0042071985,0.00011306384,0.00020544058,0.0018362727,0.00076264626,0.69721496,0.0007723012,0.2922227,0.0014997617,0.00016272764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008103294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033179605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009043065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022422515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025730932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026595533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125265655","doi":"10.1506/2ukm-aw62-bna6-0ap6","title":"Evidence of Choice Avoidance in Capital‐Investment Judgements*","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Control (management); Investment (military); Capital investment; Investment decisions; Decision process; Capital (architecture); Psychology; Function (biology); Decision-making; Cognition; Capital budgeting; Process (computing); Decision fatigue; Actuarial science; Business; Social psychology; Economics; Business decision mapping; Marketing; Microeconomics; Decision analysis; Finance; R-CAST; Behavioral economics; Management science; Political science; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.4343637681212236,"score_gpt":0.5058215024596886,"score_spread":0.07145773433846497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125265655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961826,0.00006674467,0.0003343001,0.00008100033,0.000008458276,0.000008009211,0.000017662991,0.0000057148222,0.0032953767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994411,0.000032687545,0.00020943317,0.000050761577,0.0000074568766,0.000010785256,0.000025875743,0.0000032929581,0.00021846977],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934716,0.0030289013,0.0005020629,0.0005098435,0.0022147007,0.0002730019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85696507,0.09638622,0.029775728,0.008596735,0.0053802975,0.0028960034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005996372,0.0003810726,0.00039567662,0.0011090201,0.00067586475,0.0022589797,0.00045664553,0.0009387803,0.0034809986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08303277,0.00042906243,0.00039624772,0.00044769357,0.0019753003,0.0010013427,0.0018451535,0.001584277,0.00028647966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004658152,0.0015550994,0.8628997,0.00066132325,0.00074843713,0.00052790187,0.041092414,0.001533098,0.02429405,0.0045469487,0.001240466,0.056242354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010815588,0.0007621057,0.97964877,0.000107240536,0.00010891178,0.0005119924,0.00632623,0.0022352512,0.002590303,0.0054051518,0.002086065,0.00010980975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000929943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009251636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005996372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004398249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024313568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031712234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125350215","doi":"10.1007/s11579-009-0021-2","title":"Static portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Chinese Academy of Sciences","keywords":"Cumulative prospect theory; Portfolio; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics; Econometrics; Asset (computer security); Skewness; Modern portfolio theory; Capital asset pricing model; Prospect theory; Mathematical finance; Mathematical economics; Financial economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07211863151762005,"score_gpt":0.37371363962320003,"score_spread":0.30159500810558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125350215","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25973973,0.00074113987,0.7131325,0.0018446572,0.00007944088,0.000094168674,0.00013467444,0.00011278642,0.024120968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96349573,0.00048836455,0.031219944,0.00010853325,0.000044956,0.00006206892,0.000055553497,0.000016943635,0.0045079347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922335,0.00039531256,0.000031234482,0.00009001062,0.00014593746,0.00011419521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982565,0.0010761404,0.00023634461,0.00007999122,0.00015922755,0.00019175651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019084894,0.0007085004,0.0007887926,0.00076291163,0.00033567383,0.0016488982,0.00072930247,0.0015886637,0.0023880044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006018239,0.0004312529,0.00075868267,0.00055968,0.0012789792,0.0020622313,0.0009621786,0.00090950646,0.0002821852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006279319,0.000053731328,0.0012797916,0.000058178306,0.000042196407,0.00027200783,0.000085944994,0.48259678,0.0012777488,0.50477844,0.00066425686,0.008828107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000283434,0.00006856909,0.00037251244,0.00001991727,0.000015966885,0.00005979288,0.000023262051,0.74671656,0.00031885097,0.2519094,0.00044505397,0.000021779877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011033193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007054725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023880044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012392205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011134968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010093212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125771274","doi":"","title":"Lottery Decisions and Probability Weighting Function","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Weighting; Argument (complex analysis); Function (biology); Mathematical economics; Preference; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.08285315703391606,"score_gpt":0.34571459376499214,"score_spread":0.2628614367310761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125771274","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3207968,0.0009566163,0.61741775,0.0056391107,0.00017648257,0.00029960432,0.0002814965,0.00020777482,0.054224323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94422495,0.00029482538,0.05182073,0.00038543533,0.00010735046,0.00028389064,0.000106976724,0.000029729772,0.002746038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866746,0.0098418025,0.0005381047,0.0007434833,0.0013910884,0.00081089477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9096824,0.0802503,0.003117469,0.0035595552,0.002358282,0.0010319026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019230945,0.0009350191,0.001569336,0.0016537997,0.0008680389,0.003648106,0.0018295489,0.0031307808,0.0073039015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.096177444,0.00042452934,0.0010203788,0.0012483953,0.0065846327,0.009225574,0.0016696864,0.0028100489,0.0007920616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013073873,0.00007437159,0.0010093622,0.00006322486,0.000027823278,0.00008592679,0.00013266606,0.008631832,0.0002637879,0.9721696,0.00045764312,0.016953092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044148506,0.00010901765,0.0007012518,0.000027660173,0.000007718203,0.00009269014,0.000045813853,0.035209164,0.00028820254,0.96253556,0.0009151418,0.000023652548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040447994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023015951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019230945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013887204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009836265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10170418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125871527","doi":"10.1093/rof/rfu021","title":"Improving Investment Decisions with Simulated Experience","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Finance Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Zürich; Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster; Universität Innsbruck; California Institute of Technology; Simon Fraser University; Stony Brook University; University of Central Florida; University of Sussex; Florida State University","keywords":"Investment decisions; Return on investment; Investment (military); Financial risk; Financial services; Experience sampling method; Finance; Actuarial science; Business; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Behavioral economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.13179014471000466,"score_gpt":0.37705753846547485,"score_spread":0.2452673937554702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125871527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8452626,0.0004252604,0.14148578,0.0010605925,0.00007496341,0.00021106534,0.00011203142,0.0003168912,0.011050785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803743,0.00016295738,0.018625392,0.00012225447,0.000014736195,0.00008422082,0.000054696073,0.000007020393,0.0005544568],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696285,0.0022994806,0.00009217847,0.00022224261,0.0002857835,0.00013734381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787663,0.017972302,0.001049214,0.0011982633,0.00053986476,0.0004740541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003917493,0.00062068313,0.0004741561,0.00035684236,0.00016099605,0.0012978573,0.00097008323,0.001229054,0.0047467924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027692571,0.00020147848,0.00036430501,0.00024637775,0.0006638615,0.001416015,0.0012916113,0.00106321,0.00044147126],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042743348,0.009321628,0.034241397,0.0015283882,0.00058570335,0.0007984723,0.0036932328,0.45569587,0.030290073,0.026056554,0.005023082,0.4284913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010408317,0.0066941427,0.015202691,0.00035595577,0.00028020245,0.00036666586,0.0011204475,0.8689024,0.018407796,0.075829804,0.01156701,0.00023212304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006201418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004729827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047467924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046964796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045564648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020717978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125966813","doi":"","title":"Human Economic Choice as Costly Information Processing","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Ambiguity; Computer science; Certainty; Task (project management); Artificial neural network; Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Cognitive psychology; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Machine learning; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06033713521119109,"score_gpt":0.29221732337412176,"score_spread":0.23188018816293066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125966813","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44761413,0.0008560033,0.4879601,0.0057341596,0.000111545916,0.00010329611,0.00024933578,0.000253872,0.057117566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973962,0.00025626703,0.022902887,0.00019596763,0.000032883705,0.00004391715,0.00004750202,0.000017804614,0.002540765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945956,0.00025701761,0.000013871799,0.000071458795,0.00012867148,0.00006941187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970029,0.0022787128,0.00020471061,0.00025489894,0.0001292868,0.00012947038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012542199,0.00035910273,0.00049475057,0.0003596528,0.00029578755,0.0016986649,0.00076688995,0.0010203229,0.0041471417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064495965,0.00028008304,0.00056269194,0.00040088134,0.00141943,0.002503668,0.0007241274,0.0008130427,0.00038633952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019528608,0.00010500237,0.0025187465,0.00008190503,0.000070549206,0.0002640782,0.00036376953,0.23263162,0.0020630304,0.73837143,0.0016550298,0.021679604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003763963,0.000039509472,0.0011974217,0.0000100727675,0.000010797487,0.00008007664,0.00003286496,0.45971924,0.00032563813,0.5374924,0.0010370014,0.00001727197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019220994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010529502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041471417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008413238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065910124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013873577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129992849","doi":"10.1177/1745691620974773","title":"Promises and Perils of Experimentation: The Mutual-Internal-Validity Problem","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"External validity; Internal validity; Triangulation; Epistemology; Psychology; Test (biology); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Management science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.25257985042198583,"score_gpt":0.5149616096208628,"score_spread":0.26238175919887696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129992849","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024711208,0.029674256,0.5085026,0.3022913,0.005776135,0.0038219593,0.0007628716,0.0009198001,0.12353973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5977074,0.007884448,0.28461465,0.077166915,0.0067651547,0.019122917,0.0003731074,0.00061919837,0.005746297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.19980355,0.6574843,0.018586235,0.027235497,0.09401862,0.0028718042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.059611347,0.81898695,0.019582815,0.08479906,0.015483473,0.0015364125],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.67817134,0.0030473191,0.006473075,0.0077950684,0.008759686,0.01614907,0.010726284,0.018517995,0.007905799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8039264,0.0032324507,0.0049724104,0.0051020132,0.09510903,0.049482036,0.021186799,0.026409784,0.002039047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007866376,0.00028694508,0.006273889,0.002626341,0.0012275007,0.00027979485,0.008265307,0.002212701,0.00042160382,0.9079185,0.008015278,0.061685476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042410582,0.0002668224,0.0010911156,0.0014423565,0.00016938617,0.00021000009,0.00093852176,0.003270779,0.0005123959,0.9723962,0.01915748,0.0001207486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002657204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001661988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32182866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013655321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017510304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3968721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130506980","doi":"","title":"Prevalence-Induced Concept Change in Older Adults.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phenomenon; Psychology; Perception; Cognition; Young adult; Exploratory research; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.17693135462829593,"score_gpt":0.3813084710477123,"score_spread":0.2043771164194164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130506980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99475336,0.00068028853,0.0010153278,0.00018682028,0.000046754758,0.00007625626,0.00019379919,0.000027041522,0.0030204912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714065,0.00021846345,0.0011599199,0.00018835979,0.000024288816,0.00005045249,0.00030274267,0.000006518215,0.00090868457],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986268,0.00022197714,0.00014719191,0.0002895398,0.0006066831,0.000107864995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990017,0.003021907,0.004159222,0.0010963144,0.0011309414,0.0005745835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024683655,0.0005378925,0.0003898578,0.00069635175,0.00047412177,0.0012282243,0.00040017482,0.0008615281,0.0060085203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024431203,0.0003067337,0.0005286383,0.00025280446,0.0006297931,0.0018589098,0.0014474199,0.0013778487,0.00055236125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011492998,0.0018267668,0.84985375,0.00073363795,0.00034700969,0.00069679384,0.02066763,0.0003375919,0.025267351,0.0014457704,0.0029486963,0.09472567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051925505,0.0009702885,0.98637724,0.00007999627,0.00008601742,0.0012150779,0.002433414,0.0006156473,0.002354605,0.0028388659,0.002926344,0.000050473755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014489645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020043831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060085203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044058802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026731123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020100474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131101190","doi":"10.1002/wcs.1556","title":"Resource‐rational approach to meta‐control problems across the lifespan","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Control (management); Affect (linguistics); Resource (disambiguation); Adaptation (eye); Cognitive aging; Meta-analysis; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.37619018900321216,"score_gpt":0.5136070250188354,"score_spread":0.1374168360156232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131101190","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011128883,0.85224754,0.10148597,0.009603458,0.00034629423,0.0000614981,0.000066744804,0.00007605751,0.024983492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20011497,0.74950874,0.043004286,0.0017273338,0.000797753,0.00018619443,0.00013387672,0.0000386788,0.004488292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869615,0.00055845495,0.00010808842,0.00020587462,0.0003616249,0.000069917296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669844,0.00247444,0.00031872935,0.00016864312,0.0002561128,0.0000835196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003887212,0.0010587984,0.0011178992,0.0019071209,0.00041163774,0.0025074088,0.001906162,0.0020330215,0.0028055564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050794613,0.00041872644,0.0011690124,0.0017126993,0.00395232,0.0037953767,0.001464836,0.003058993,0.00045692158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057771314,0.00009881974,0.001820197,0.0035417243,0.00041418878,0.0002278775,0.0004059449,0.012626077,0.00053214957,0.52180845,0.0033940312,0.45507276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000278298,0.000086046086,0.0036315494,0.0018253718,0.0001598694,0.00070511264,0.00028709995,0.011490358,0.000534971,0.9123023,0.06889458,0.000054795866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019015842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002036741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003887212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019357575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002389403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020557761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133134432","doi":"10.2308/jmar-2019-505","title":"Needs Versus Wants: The Mental Accounting and Effort Effects of Tangible Rewards","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Accounting Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mental accounting; Earnings; Psychology; Marketing; Business; Accounting; Finance","score_opus":0.13582815606805385,"score_gpt":0.45550477442668597,"score_spread":0.31967661835863215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133134432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98551315,0.00017239345,0.0004772249,0.0004094807,0.000014595632,0.00001889761,0.00007423678,0.000008025589,0.013312073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992405,0.000059923124,0.00021340964,0.000033971995,0.0000072387347,0.000008725271,0.000025024478,0.000002958049,0.00040817086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986786,0.00070912705,0.00006815775,0.000108851804,0.0002931718,0.0001419912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9555661,0.03328643,0.0070877266,0.0013490723,0.0008642626,0.0018464576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027288445,0.00032482552,0.00025128404,0.00070932927,0.0005610043,0.0022587401,0.00039282796,0.0004332559,0.012015454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031162938,0.00018184674,0.00034197673,0.00066607044,0.0011230106,0.0013957156,0.0018502349,0.0010127028,0.00023911758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037292752,0.0025330523,0.80682254,0.0007166732,0.00036041904,0.0004783377,0.0055175647,0.004789062,0.006980878,0.03671562,0.0016160266,0.12974054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006272458,0.0003149847,0.98715043,0.00011308023,0.00011442639,0.00006918932,0.0019972853,0.00215089,0.00065079326,0.006324845,0.0010185591,0.000032683034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016750515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027690136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012015454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061117136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043758523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040195704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133539121","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3765027","title":"Proximity Bias: Motivated Effects of Spatial Distance on Probability Judgments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Statistics; Statistical physics; Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.06695565864701353,"score_gpt":0.3383551975670852,"score_spread":0.2713995389200717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133539121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9600409,0.00035207975,0.018913953,0.00055464444,0.00007840632,0.000080370846,0.00012611112,0.000084963765,0.01976853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99435425,0.00006759624,0.004546855,0.00014743523,0.000053623935,0.00002680661,0.000058406524,0.000059767022,0.00068540056],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655837,0.0013426978,0.00018336119,0.0007899092,0.0009813091,0.000144408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9374268,0.048795473,0.0048681544,0.005549632,0.0019479574,0.0014119471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00432728,0.00030452618,0.0005516357,0.0007088863,0.00045585507,0.0024125034,0.0007796929,0.001402007,0.010147985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0906239,0.0005110442,0.0004529907,0.0005911004,0.0010586405,0.0027585903,0.0020549784,0.0013390178,0.0005698001],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014570323,0.0038791953,0.25783232,0.0023040543,0.0014869525,0.0012766897,0.008759004,0.021634903,0.26909384,0.15359938,0.0053870445,0.26017618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007939848,0.0020145343,0.65866715,0.0001595674,0.0006975682,0.0013542161,0.0011149776,0.04835528,0.023878938,0.25912306,0.0036353548,0.00020534593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001097446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011349228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010147985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053458073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048262015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03394842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135620714","doi":"10.3390/g12010020","title":"A Generalization of Quantal Response Equilibrium via Perturbed Utility","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Generalization; Best response; Expected utility hypothesis; Preference; Logit; Separable space; Outcome (game theory); Complementarity (molecular biology); Isoelastic utility; Economics; Quadratic equation; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Game theory; Econometrics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.13973826344195597,"score_gpt":0.403918342080461,"score_spread":0.264180078638505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135620714","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026415374,0.00013522226,0.93915296,0.0010649163,0.000070328555,0.00016491418,0.0002693723,0.00017002341,0.032556914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8501683,0.00037873475,0.12785128,0.000629087,0.00008440767,0.00042249984,0.00016528348,0.00012988686,0.020170476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975073,0.0012775704,0.000101007034,0.0004651182,0.00037659061,0.00027257184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777645,0.0011077488,0.00033648126,0.00041887097,0.00020674088,0.00015364791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023898284,0.0009711277,0.0009559235,0.0004858456,0.00057318487,0.0018014103,0.0020440922,0.0016681055,0.012962337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008291838,0.00047912434,0.0014656982,0.0005885981,0.0022444136,0.00382887,0.0022786984,0.0022904573,0.0012578759],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028873623,0.00004856477,0.00018956373,0.00005076204,0.000033472334,0.00015546328,0.000110092784,0.054154687,0.001104742,0.93913835,0.001008432,0.003976933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024612289,0.000040580195,0.00013424296,0.000014800723,0.000010612845,0.000095442854,0.000036183104,0.21730673,0.00034689845,0.7794294,0.002538973,0.00002147285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018296351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011144583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012962337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001917614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011737081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043363333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135764196","doi":"10.1257/mic.20210361","title":"Decreasing Impatience","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Economics; Convexity; Normative; Axiom; Hyperbolic discounting; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Property (philosophy); Outcome (game theory); Microeconomics; Mathematics; Discounting; Financial economics; Finance","score_opus":0.21415231905560014,"score_gpt":0.45124194714897864,"score_spread":0.2370896280933785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135764196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5100706,0.0006427356,0.4099197,0.0013477739,0.00006483931,0.00006892427,0.00036028455,0.00017239944,0.07735264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98304695,0.00024745916,0.012379756,0.00013757605,0.00004439885,0.000036536167,0.00009369211,0.00003219647,0.0039814403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883026,0.00031014057,0.00006917071,0.00031780312,0.00028029343,0.00019237866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897013,0.0045852717,0.0023335428,0.0016659616,0.001096523,0.0006173683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012126784,0.0004363103,0.00032089153,0.0009073434,0.0004920266,0.0015569355,0.0008349574,0.00057883334,0.003964267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015626095,0.00018900694,0.0006331381,0.0009854345,0.0020346998,0.0024042628,0.0010489962,0.0013838928,0.0004313341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009673441,0.00005242568,0.0061045657,0.00008225887,0.000059978127,0.00045600595,0.0008346228,0.008412387,0.004966838,0.94778234,0.001339266,0.029812615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022839176,0.00018222173,0.008331862,0.00004183237,0.000045293655,0.0011600074,0.00025613364,0.074326105,0.0037638438,0.89966625,0.012155499,0.00004805715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008796565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043728753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003964267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009181131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021817797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013261795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W314086708","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0017","title":"Judgmental Heuristics: A Historical Overview","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Normative; Computer science; Psychology; Social heuristics; Management science; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.22967725201946565,"score_gpt":0.3235526811290206,"score_spread":0.09387542910955493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W314086708","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002779497,0.7907984,0.01894789,0.011610987,0.0011667613,0.000037635902,0.00016110252,0.000064292726,0.17443338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17101155,0.7795485,0.016404951,0.005265857,0.0042805667,0.00015109316,0.00031487548,0.00012633893,0.022896234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981736,0.00082634966,0.00012297265,0.0003029528,0.00045796938,0.000116231575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590814,0.0030305972,0.00014872079,0.00016876397,0.0006071353,0.00013660772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003326286,0.000785585,0.0006106636,0.0065791607,0.0011863778,0.005307858,0.0012235752,0.001959755,0.0055866153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056187203,0.00050272234,0.00035106004,0.0075449906,0.009048725,0.006923026,0.0015379032,0.003457732,0.001561956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003376248,0.000053782554,0.0005105969,0.0011596334,0.000020392483,0.0001109441,0.0013485816,0.0012073601,0.00013795291,0.79624933,0.021600936,0.17756665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007177606,0.000024108473,0.0014123097,0.0020980672,0.000010461428,0.00034689656,0.0005855907,0.00087753247,0.0002365514,0.337654,0.6567165,0.000030792187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039465125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021919592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065791607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052446574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024479833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038052857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147116413","doi":"10.3390/jrfm14040158","title":"The Standard Model of Rational Risky Decision-Making","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical economics; Axiom; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Subjective expected utility; Von Neumann architecture; Certainty; Prospect theory; Random variable; Valuation (finance); Variable (mathematics); Mathematics; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04077975711709097,"score_gpt":0.340680903056284,"score_spread":0.29990114593919304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147116413","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050105207,0.0020320807,0.7066652,0.013312732,0.0002894065,0.00023629617,0.001084589,0.00020665364,0.22606778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8503658,0.0024989955,0.09409363,0.0008759125,0.0003259399,0.00045385523,0.00038705545,0.0000422568,0.050956637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828136,0.00075465435,0.000087713044,0.00028866666,0.00041412938,0.00017346145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987249,0.00068797154,0.0001586697,0.00016200531,0.00014267988,0.0001237393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018997273,0.0009377697,0.000944032,0.00063416443,0.0006554099,0.0038836517,0.0022755882,0.002848315,0.008771254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033567043,0.00033130578,0.0010144786,0.0010321961,0.0031055845,0.003361789,0.0013966098,0.0021471197,0.00143528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012708764,0.000010745337,0.00007855218,0.000020906546,0.000009821837,0.000055251447,0.000068686226,0.0086134495,0.00008704932,0.9891102,0.0004840198,0.0014485995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026821639,0.000024076122,0.00008819077,0.000020497038,0.000007865118,0.000054158416,0.000033212662,0.037932992,0.00006211715,0.9570874,0.0046520606,0.0000105386325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021051974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016158358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008771254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018279804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016611092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029342711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152131359","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/u62cx","title":"The Social Determinants of Cognitive Bias: The Effects of Low Capability on Decision Making in a Framing Experiment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Framing effect; Loss aversion; Prospect theory; Cognitive bias; Social psychology; Psychology; Behavioral economics; Cognition; Economics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.13064716839919457,"score_gpt":0.46763397908753984,"score_spread":0.33698681068834524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152131359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99362504,0.000043839045,0.0014758089,0.0001490834,0.000021660033,0.00018186869,0.00003821519,0.000007277682,0.004457105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99634403,0.000041824347,0.0024116202,0.0001910343,0.000028592864,0.00031939973,0.000053183554,0.000007222765,0.00060314575],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846341,0.011185234,0.0004880622,0.0010550105,0.0019470956,0.0006905308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89652455,0.08126708,0.010840635,0.007460065,0.0017885179,0.0021191388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017627232,0.00054662465,0.00051002693,0.0005356534,0.00150361,0.0015269448,0.0006513166,0.0011269265,0.0033725614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06034714,0.00034415937,0.00053720723,0.000452599,0.0028850823,0.00086198334,0.0013983626,0.0019818896,0.00023496662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.028815439,0.031792525,0.72544146,0.0005578891,0.0014310842,0.00083162537,0.04562271,0.006551179,0.05779439,0.022312742,0.0022588025,0.07659015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020875612,0.016686035,0.9128548,0.00014953199,0.00085193,0.0003774694,0.0063470965,0.01373809,0.015271455,0.024053155,0.0072639184,0.00031895397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00806497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067875427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017627232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009096326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011015077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0932228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152805028","doi":"10.1080/20954816.2020.1827500","title":"Willingness to pay to reduce future risk: a fundamental issue to invest in prevention behaviour","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic and Political Studies","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Endowment effect; Willingness to pay; Actuarial science; Economics; Control (management); Cash; Willingness to accept; Endowment; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.16369699794284187,"score_gpt":0.446054803544856,"score_spread":0.2823578056020141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152805028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9621056,0.0006267932,0.018878985,0.0033020407,0.000057691403,0.00013300727,0.0001237967,0.000030799718,0.01474132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99428326,0.0002035082,0.004040376,0.00032251413,0.000019069363,0.00008827933,0.00003377945,0.00000496977,0.0010041099],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975266,0.0017917885,0.00011059062,0.00019264643,0.00024890626,0.00012952505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869845,0.009719953,0.0015827512,0.0009157283,0.00027288386,0.00052429794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005452721,0.00035520896,0.0005706613,0.00018725725,0.00027937445,0.0014972485,0.00031094148,0.0019100787,0.0049786824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01709026,0.0002657074,0.00031590246,0.00022673422,0.0007319989,0.00096080045,0.0003862167,0.0014497344,0.00038693848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007529548,0.011590775,0.34288839,0.001986538,0.0010000598,0.00053320493,0.004767957,0.031214163,0.08114784,0.17583913,0.004815473,0.33668697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005989453,0.008655651,0.55441415,0.0005510733,0.0006536286,0.00079657394,0.0028270746,0.039229624,0.018864531,0.35926664,0.013910712,0.0002313306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020977827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034306134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005452721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003672825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051439024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028837085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154981307","doi":"10.1162/jocn_a_01721","title":"Does Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Damage Really Increase Impulsiveness? Delay and Probability Discounting in Patients with Focal Lesions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health; York University","keywords":"Ventromedial prefrontal cortex; Psychology; Discounting; Temporal discounting; Probabilistic logic; Prefrontal cortex; Delay discounting; Impulsivity; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Cognition; Neuroscience; Statistics; Economics","score_opus":0.03323203935288998,"score_gpt":0.3291510226263755,"score_spread":0.29591898327348554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154981307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998099,0.00003890563,0.000028566623,0.000017687114,8.6277794e-7,0.0000015873894,0.000016325399,0.000002449605,0.000083651226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99980944,0.000041508476,0.000053322645,0.000009491436,0.0000022722556,0.0000012040177,0.000026940415,7.1046395e-7,0.00005514398],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999472,0.0000055210494,0.000007223634,0.000019157043,0.000010930938,0.0000098465125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996449,0.00006270776,0.00018341777,0.000028262768,0.000015596592,0.00006510993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001369607,0.00031809538,0.00035589788,0.00061492715,0.00024600266,0.00033322285,0.00016695465,0.0004164721,0.0011280747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007761613,0.0002466292,0.00016555913,0.00032014225,0.0005162592,0.0002728894,0.00019009349,0.00033072734,0.00012762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017017645,0.00032364158,0.9176468,0.000068777335,0.00017537785,0.0074105263,0.00089693704,0.0003463588,0.0575052,0.00013040274,0.00012650897,0.013667688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036350673,0.00040781216,0.98875487,0.000008597977,0.00004544935,0.008074727,0.00023935316,0.00036066325,0.0018055965,0.00015853021,0.00009742854,0.000010540441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018965057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003392863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018965057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032363203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015802101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0037738085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155792879","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500005404","title":"Cultivating credibility with probability words and numbers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Ministère de la Défense Nationale","keywords":"Credibility; Probability distribution; Psychology; Probability model; Econometrics; Computer science; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0810091612559306,"score_gpt":0.36920782972218935,"score_spread":0.28819866846625875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155792879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91358364,0.00068533263,0.047124088,0.0028704759,0.00027402656,0.00015461075,0.00009805929,0.0002977709,0.034912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847335,0.00021415179,0.01383094,0.00023679092,0.00009611893,0.00007115288,0.000038832703,0.00004406546,0.0007344124],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908216,0.0056764274,0.000475375,0.0009376665,0.0018288317,0.00026008996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80853057,0.16003501,0.016738715,0.0073506376,0.0051400037,0.0022050682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008383279,0.0008182684,0.0005920014,0.0010397186,0.00053676043,0.004066131,0.00086606026,0.0016041022,0.008145158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14422625,0.00055936666,0.00035627265,0.00069783826,0.002721591,0.0074557476,0.0027214226,0.002223973,0.000848643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008631393,0.00410581,0.06829428,0.0045264447,0.00050637365,0.0015862418,0.034144334,0.028589055,0.15593167,0.21626803,0.006162369,0.4712541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002015788,0.006360701,0.08219786,0.0015383358,0.0012008481,0.0014304422,0.007826203,0.13357493,0.067682326,0.66744506,0.028121306,0.00060614495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039764194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002894356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008383279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006960943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044335544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157959619","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x20000953","title":"Pleas for patience from the cumulative future self","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada Auto Workers; The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Patience; Set (abstract data type); Power (physics); Intertemporal choice; Psychology; Social psychology; Term (time); Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.2442724312796611,"score_gpt":0.42748739271484537,"score_spread":0.18321496143518426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157959619","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006035709,0.0013163338,0.00021368559,0.98653525,0.0052222502,0.0000055732135,0.00001305273,0.000017290015,0.00607302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0157193,0.0014286512,0.00029076784,0.9565309,0.017412288,0.000027568452,0.00001085047,0.000012460714,0.008567192],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978933,0.0009029354,0.00014214539,0.00030471236,0.000563262,0.00019366831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98938864,0.007947375,0.00039624027,0.00068779814,0.0008318747,0.0007479725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00348759,0.00039680963,0.0008025369,0.0002751513,0.0022094133,0.002931195,0.0010138932,0.026346192,0.0071857646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020651368,0.00026667077,0.0005029639,0.00023741333,0.0069248034,0.0035676109,0.0012462521,0.03693465,0.007924068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009260946,0.000040405906,0.00075592095,0.00004177011,0.00001701166,0.0028297042,0.00023958953,0.00007263186,0.00025639863,0.037557658,0.9320943,0.026002089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015439789,0.00006702132,0.0012754091,0.00024616823,0.000015883608,0.0051934635,0.0006437293,0.0008066828,0.00035622244,0.10308685,0.8881077,0.00004653366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017489135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029907096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026346192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026734038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020552012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024038732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158170300","doi":"10.7202/1091798ar","title":"La dictature des 3P :Prévention, Prudence, Précaution","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prudence; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09123075887161222,"score_gpt":0.3840317167062193,"score_spread":0.292800957834607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158170300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01972253,0.025343832,0.26818165,0.2124433,0.0051556774,0.0002469564,0.0014891446,0.00037255787,0.4670444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7599307,0.022252057,0.09003278,0.03493878,0.0048913993,0.001376984,0.0006441127,0.00034676597,0.085586555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874784,0.00596932,0.000984991,0.0018361305,0.002968082,0.0007631175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98861444,0.007133622,0.0012676982,0.0011193416,0.0015486666,0.0003161991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00938029,0.00093882467,0.0008482165,0.0014373357,0.0027635535,0.006188525,0.0015580263,0.006321726,0.012207436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021291109,0.0006395778,0.0012908882,0.0016423818,0.014617023,0.0065258406,0.0034661847,0.00850424,0.0033808195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001685826,0.000004987975,0.0002188392,0.00008496439,0.000008742305,0.000046161702,0.00038955477,0.00031494035,0.0000922314,0.9888855,0.0037505121,0.006186693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025194373,0.000045227596,0.0007593527,0.00044676074,0.00002720446,0.00027022182,0.00030512258,0.0008803565,0.0005726253,0.8407093,0.15591879,0.000039902217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010353079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005323308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012207436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004380402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006961142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04960835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159193802","doi":"","title":"Graphical Depiction of Statistical Information Improves Gambling-Related Judgments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Presentation (obstetrics); Psychology; Scratch; Domain (mathematical analysis); Computer science; Information retrieval; Statistics; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.02798652188078146,"score_gpt":0.3424345583327339,"score_spread":0.31444803645195246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159193802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769108,0.0005758732,0.01134047,0.00043600675,0.00020439962,0.0001619944,0.00021157207,0.0008573426,0.0093015125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97811025,0.00043352364,0.018584669,0.00024174267,0.00008342086,0.00008916195,0.0003056995,0.0001345285,0.002017004],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986105,0.00058338844,0.00013836895,0.00023852124,0.00033601362,0.00009313044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872799,0.008983773,0.0017957132,0.0010033891,0.0004037183,0.0005335519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013201601,0.0008325688,0.00065578386,0.0005263431,0.00017396214,0.0016620267,0.00048527142,0.0008873474,0.016369745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027408833,0.00030032074,0.00037579544,0.000307827,0.00036463194,0.0020564985,0.001029463,0.00094339275,0.0015509045],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025068706,0.0073220995,0.029408792,0.003072883,0.00037353407,0.0008693915,0.0024116114,0.009371868,0.4282148,0.00596206,0.006845569,0.4810786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004321273,0.05462717,0.51227987,0.0020949037,0.002396513,0.0030767843,0.0035512005,0.13280432,0.19331382,0.05029638,0.040159214,0.0010785373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030997032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037536008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016369745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027993752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022292443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054762185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160244203","doi":"10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.05.001","title":"Associations between phasic arousal and decisions under risk in younger and older adults","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neurobiology of Aging","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Arousal; Pupillary response; Psychology; Pupillometry; Developmental psychology; Low arousal theory; Audiology; Young adult; Pupil; Medicine; Social psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.08219081522370424,"score_gpt":0.37096814494627334,"score_spread":0.2887773297225691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160244203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993337,0.00013390159,0.000025420415,0.000024992201,0.0000043532646,0.0000024109386,0.00009129744,8.0718905e-7,0.0003829823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992161,0.00011711667,0.000051854855,0.00003371133,0.00001348742,0.0000033046922,0.00012648111,9.541906e-7,0.00043701372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999335,0.000011791508,0.000008551818,0.000018380391,0.000010434847,0.000017312486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916613,0.00023784646,0.00030192028,0.000041902036,0.000066657,0.0001854954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026536942,0.00019643684,0.0002640719,0.00029189637,0.00021281774,0.00072434725,0.00009099543,0.00044717602,0.0015679209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022983644,0.00015203346,0.00015308346,0.00022937501,0.00015207435,0.00035131903,0.0002726725,0.00050221867,0.00016212369],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009691021,0.0002769252,0.9906114,0.000025482523,0.00008954582,0.00009192874,0.0008093345,0.00007910678,0.0017022527,0.000085791515,0.00012956267,0.0051295427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056285726,0.00010066772,0.9994342,0.0000023735183,0.000009694687,0.00004322247,0.00015749806,0.00008193279,0.000034102624,0.00007965143,0.000048704063,0.000002232936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035485227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076082884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035485227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013856239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011798983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0070557594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160674630","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/qsnea","title":"A Tutorial on Cognitive Modeling for Cognitive Aging Research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Cognitive aging; Cognitive model; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Structural equation modeling; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.8028651390569861,"score_gpt":0.6151710269779309,"score_spread":0.18769411207905518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160674630","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013246931,0.07011428,0.84830755,0.012352238,0.0032174482,0.00021101776,0.0021654428,0.0028039673,0.05950339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037801843,0.11731079,0.75838673,0.008514776,0.0114141,0.0016172952,0.0040610544,0.0024264993,0.058466922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986804,0.0006511033,0.00012347824,0.0001671478,0.00030460046,0.00007319508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99416924,0.004894193,0.00018720233,0.0002502909,0.0003735161,0.00012554105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032291892,0.0029696163,0.0012616869,0.0025630323,0.00070797047,0.0028640032,0.0024079073,0.0027364774,0.04548181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010305007,0.0008943323,0.0020678283,0.0030809462,0.001356719,0.005261082,0.0015868556,0.0042617666,0.019126337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035328358,0.00012488125,0.00052646536,0.0016837246,0.000091637594,0.00033855913,0.0005776447,0.008324079,0.0009969859,0.6109378,0.1995702,0.1767927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012022581,0.000033248354,0.00037746443,0.0005074695,0.00002835955,0.00037064965,0.000069743226,0.011557335,0.00028674025,0.56634873,0.420367,0.00004126558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025052596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002372095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04548181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015489926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016038487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15215176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161513602","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/yt9cm","title":"Using Icon Arrays to Communicate Gambling Information Reduces the Appeal of Scratch Card Games","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Appeal; Salience (neuroscience); Scratch; Computer science; Psychology; Perception; Feeling; Information seeking; Advertising; Internet privacy; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Information retrieval; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.47784076430262523,"score_gpt":0.4782812633588952,"score_spread":0.00044049905626997177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161513602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95716286,0.000368587,0.026283715,0.0003487283,0.00022962803,0.00023662817,0.00012362035,0.0009985103,0.014247789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96200204,0.0002819884,0.033878166,0.0003553341,0.00008731678,0.00026629795,0.00016082377,0.00012521025,0.002842879],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988967,0.00046975948,0.00008562041,0.00016540858,0.00026956244,0.00011282305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913639,0.006163465,0.001005452,0.00066211,0.0003806125,0.00042441182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097311486,0.0010210449,0.000495023,0.0005628891,0.00020027968,0.0011854678,0.00053841475,0.0007824815,0.013791304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018431783,0.00029087905,0.0002757191,0.00026443164,0.0004780475,0.0014100979,0.0010938086,0.00075482274,0.0013219411],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012680174,0.004916031,0.018760374,0.001963141,0.00019492154,0.00077337737,0.0029358768,0.004844662,0.596168,0.0060938178,0.005398581,0.34527114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027801106,0.039812047,0.35851765,0.0019712881,0.0018310538,0.0027721443,0.0055742883,0.103254765,0.39776415,0.026327848,0.058763497,0.00063125364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031154085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041348694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013791304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022777863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022190968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0461365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163279460","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4771721","title":"Rational vs. Irrational Beliefs in a Complex World","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada; Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Irrational number; Psychology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12356299317244869,"score_gpt":0.4096547294732133,"score_spread":0.2860917363007646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163279460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9090157,0.00060981524,0.049345426,0.007793496,0.000085475585,0.000047998376,0.00012593943,0.000031840835,0.032944284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969472,0.00020427056,0.0022044585,0.0001181746,0.000059169655,0.000016811067,0.000016971995,0.0000064347455,0.00042646236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832386,0.00078790233,0.00010868091,0.00022444125,0.0003758386,0.00017925186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9524715,0.04017457,0.003559906,0.0014791772,0.0012368162,0.0010780013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058761276,0.00031569114,0.0004698166,0.0008415315,0.00038375412,0.004075642,0.0004400262,0.0017315842,0.0044084513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04121695,0.00025112787,0.0003639308,0.0006354734,0.002644558,0.0050146985,0.0012476881,0.0016378735,0.00018847352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074857887,0.00025726657,0.025425686,0.00035733223,0.00018682818,0.00043451946,0.0022667968,0.031076891,0.0015605129,0.89436394,0.001403566,0.04191808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084650106,0.000103830374,0.009916464,0.0000453494,0.000059749826,0.00009007923,0.00076655677,0.054152887,0.00029397698,0.93404454,0.00041728033,0.000024711104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005727155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050143304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058761276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007448181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032397438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031076312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163772508","doi":"10.1111/cogs.13041","title":"Plans or Outcomes: How Do We Attribute Intelligence to Others?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Outcome (game theory); Planner; Psychology; Task (project management); Human intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Quality (philosophy); Artificial intelligence; Key (lock); Social psychology; Computer science; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.33029010703308453,"score_gpt":0.4760305961946483,"score_spread":0.1457404891615638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163772508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.841948,0.0011437485,0.12417021,0.0025329813,0.000101521495,0.00021300252,0.00058819546,0.0003609603,0.028941566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99115646,0.0002068077,0.007857089,0.00012034019,0.000026658397,0.0000694117,0.00014514649,0.000051646828,0.00036644447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99346876,0.002667016,0.00030535858,0.0015598653,0.0016169314,0.00038210506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95435023,0.018542103,0.013056816,0.008171237,0.0032387476,0.0026407845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087178685,0.0012805326,0.0007086118,0.0038178514,0.0008828052,0.006569535,0.0011477759,0.0016256836,0.00225213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090714246,0.0007843774,0.0010014796,0.0025750985,0.0076176263,0.011266588,0.003053408,0.0019295629,0.00036162796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009146717,0.0003295848,0.60752904,0.0007056265,0.001658391,0.0003782451,0.026940314,0.027437901,0.008694064,0.12607414,0.0020892187,0.19724879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010500211,0.0006600524,0.52809817,0.0003222193,0.00052222464,0.0004005158,0.008374988,0.05318228,0.00479077,0.39484572,0.008280069,0.00041798412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039386214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015187337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0087178685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010486281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006695202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046105027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164126022","doi":"10.1177/09567976211024254","title":"Noise Increases Anchoring Effects","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Anchoring; Stimulus (psychology); Psychology; Psychophysics; Perception; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.17018581827456375,"score_gpt":0.48360973784537664,"score_spread":0.3134239195708129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164126022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90414214,0.0012702377,0.07624991,0.00075468706,0.0002714482,0.00013571484,0.00026041834,0.0003041428,0.016611373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98621726,0.0001899756,0.01218741,0.0002902155,0.000063415224,0.000053596326,0.00012113382,0.00006666113,0.0008104347],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955662,0.001054618,0.0003474479,0.0010528212,0.0017438426,0.00023491235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96200174,0.027436458,0.0027759837,0.0049034315,0.0021515123,0.00073098484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037184306,0.0005675226,0.0008322896,0.00060887623,0.00040136607,0.0016649257,0.00068551034,0.001237325,0.0050236615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039348613,0.0005635593,0.0006777175,0.00035112497,0.0010360274,0.0020286583,0.0021471423,0.0015451552,0.00057759],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020380707,0.0005345181,0.051600795,0.00075839716,0.00024771946,0.0009091033,0.001390467,0.006609784,0.81968755,0.02076939,0.000840139,0.09461404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002822914,0.003985791,0.48361483,0.00024398061,0.00059526827,0.0028733637,0.0008165834,0.033991724,0.33993354,0.12090053,0.012471896,0.0002901052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057743693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047137632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050236615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058374647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039975767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019665182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166550623","doi":"10.20944/preprints202106.0177.v1","title":"Choice Under Uncertainty and Ambiguity: An Empirical Inquiry of a Behavioral Economic Experiment Applied to COVID-19.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Preprints.org","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Context (archaeology); Odds; Public health; Public economics; Actuarial science; Psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Economics; Management science; Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.6070011200828059,"score_gpt":0.5612884243724034,"score_spread":0.045712695710402484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166550623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97150683,0.00024249303,0.012416994,0.001786628,0.00015849953,0.001887975,0.00039174594,0.000032583568,0.011576218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702463,0.00032082965,0.020541796,0.0012901027,0.000085624,0.004298547,0.00031914792,0.000045246285,0.0028523065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97893,0.017434277,0.00056004786,0.0010897119,0.0014250077,0.0005609629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78972894,0.18875459,0.009478084,0.0076192394,0.0019911556,0.002428102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03702859,0.00062754954,0.0011076475,0.0005516181,0.0013702458,0.0037560365,0.0014276434,0.00250558,0.005170723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15158732,0.00050529593,0.0009042688,0.0008480307,0.0030761154,0.002638293,0.0021309755,0.00427389,0.0005359095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0580041,0.123207,0.20058264,0.0038347244,0.0032521707,0.001907287,0.048713226,0.06035923,0.033409156,0.25901088,0.015959844,0.19175981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011672315,0.05999375,0.18682817,0.001133156,0.001375448,0.0008647942,0.019811712,0.22722845,0.013854785,0.42989665,0.046377752,0.000963064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002071151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016454605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03702859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019812135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023286385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19582826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168391240","doi":"10.1093/ej/ueaf030","title":"The Dynamics of Inattention in the (Baseball) Field","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Exploit; League; Scarcity; Download; Affect (linguistics); Work (physics); Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Psychology; Computer security; Engineering","score_opus":0.0817865970839414,"score_gpt":0.39000589164508775,"score_spread":0.3082192945611464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168391240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96671313,0.00040639009,0.0054192115,0.0014617902,0.00004145839,0.000020685817,0.00034590263,0.00002448136,0.025566801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99546343,0.00017418386,0.0003840912,0.000045212935,0.000016936652,0.0000077531295,0.00007356569,0.000008704417,0.003825936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974805,0.00007210713,0.000008632426,0.00004095342,0.000042435706,0.00008782298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702954,0.0012980619,0.0004843098,0.00009784148,0.00025065363,0.00083957607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009759422,0.0002738,0.0005059058,0.00091876026,0.0007230789,0.0028705837,0.00062018255,0.00094392005,0.013541336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007416197,0.00025071113,0.00023700285,0.0005339185,0.0010412367,0.0015529563,0.0009400625,0.0010598424,0.0008930154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035585808,0.0020019994,0.22844043,0.00026660447,0.00023264556,0.0026051737,0.0072448496,0.14561373,0.02964858,0.4537124,0.021729004,0.10494597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016390813,0.00051404483,0.33991882,0.00015812041,0.00005946683,0.0007461379,0.008729109,0.26688552,0.0010786876,0.37400258,0.00759871,0.00014480963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014616912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012677095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014616912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011681085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000675659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045300305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169178731","doi":"10.3386/w30910","title":"Dynamic Inconsistency in Risky Choice: Evidence from the Lab and Field","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Data science; Econometrics; Psychology; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.7522762698277524,"score_gpt":0.6515421769172369,"score_spread":0.1007340929105155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169178731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732204,0.001273144,0.006497159,0.0011862748,0.000068471265,0.00009275769,0.0020099469,0.00009793222,0.015553996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915285,0.0004294575,0.003211063,0.00089792523,0.0000643527,0.00013301587,0.002487798,0.00007395516,0.001173941],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892866,0.006303995,0.0005397019,0.0020059587,0.0015759266,0.00028788406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8283074,0.09236973,0.036210515,0.03385897,0.0061588157,0.0030944748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019740477,0.00037590507,0.0010426055,0.0013488759,0.000954071,0.0031847805,0.0016993452,0.0016731708,0.007483311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09398025,0.00062503386,0.00059332204,0.0017464177,0.0024287733,0.0023813215,0.0023511,0.0017290957,0.0013692849],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0051524877,0.0040686284,0.8670538,0.0005097009,0.0014700829,0.00028089457,0.0037396415,0.004486975,0.0024620513,0.011623685,0.013344929,0.08580716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071822375,0.0011401281,0.9283509,0.00020320117,0.00041506716,0.00051372964,0.002183255,0.0076940893,0.0020482233,0.03839671,0.018117929,0.0002184832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052408474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003962624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019740477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008017095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007267226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10439885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170229078","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500007385","title":"Preferences for rank in competition: Is first-place seeking stronger than last-place aversion?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Competition (biology); Rank (graph theory); Risk aversion (psychology); Social psychology; Psychology; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11650631349044685,"score_gpt":0.35977218640903547,"score_spread":0.24326587291858862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170229078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99640155,0.0000724348,0.0006189712,0.00015119676,0.0000051125353,0.0000067555334,0.000022204918,0.000002955437,0.0027188929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996822,0.000015956288,0.00014758724,0.000035202618,0.000002618656,0.000002321023,0.000010792015,8.927176e-7,0.000102448634],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864405,0.00070632854,0.000068450725,0.00016325043,0.00029635776,0.0001216186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772866,0.01290386,0.0054193954,0.001466484,0.0009796692,0.001944021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046671643,0.00018921502,0.0004608536,0.00068684603,0.00039032765,0.00190355,0.00030741494,0.00091119617,0.005761536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020481704,0.00014945655,0.00044510956,0.00050951116,0.0014165464,0.00085172587,0.000721004,0.0012161818,0.00019957531],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016045297,0.0007441148,0.9525034,0.0002179975,0.00044849786,0.00035350202,0.002954947,0.0019294005,0.0060628774,0.0083773015,0.0008296515,0.023973756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005609098,0.0007097942,0.9783151,0.000058650687,0.0001281133,0.00035487392,0.0036628027,0.0047286097,0.0010014873,0.010032707,0.0008829665,0.00006875616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001329353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019298391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005761536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002910752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022023353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024682641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171185325","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12763","title":"Risky‐choice framing and rational decision‐making","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Framing effect; Narrative; Epistemology; Psychology; Empirical research; Prospect theory; Management science; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14862799612947,"score_gpt":0.40913365641103544,"score_spread":0.2605056602815654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171185325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33824384,0.0037060033,0.3325764,0.01932962,0.00062047446,0.00018436345,0.0001755898,0.000109322915,0.30505443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870214,0.0005416971,0.0106705185,0.00040776972,0.00011940326,0.000045186967,0.000032,0.000017499655,0.0011445001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875938,0.009529822,0.00022395949,0.00060962804,0.0015219835,0.00052081083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9553367,0.035094593,0.0038344678,0.0029570868,0.0020103443,0.0007667949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014140218,0.00059124356,0.000575254,0.0010554066,0.0007655085,0.0035408156,0.0006941606,0.0015402745,0.008005076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03750627,0.00034237586,0.0006532279,0.0008553532,0.0091371965,0.004843929,0.0019962671,0.0021536087,0.00045678203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008098172,0.000046424706,0.0012156896,0.00008557829,0.00002912835,0.000063324595,0.0011180899,0.003598683,0.00032464374,0.98246634,0.00059396087,0.0103771435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027373424,0.00002899178,0.0010532783,0.000063294654,0.000018677843,0.000028732715,0.0003587988,0.0068156724,0.0002495105,0.9877067,0.003632369,0.0000166339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077732786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005257918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014140218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019719736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079744693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07478154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171315464","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3369078","title":"An Ordinal Theory of Worst- and Best-Case Expected Utility","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ordinal data; Econometrics; Ordinal optimization; Statistics; Ordinal regression; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06428426999270867,"score_gpt":0.3724670102434361,"score_spread":0.30818274025072745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171315464","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012304919,0.0010095249,0.9560138,0.0017982452,0.00017904548,0.000058128782,0.00024991305,0.000097819866,0.02828861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6925918,0.0020760507,0.2902286,0.0005517745,0.0010675841,0.00054417667,0.00051464204,0.00012066509,0.012304805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869659,0.007660284,0.0008311164,0.001102546,0.0027058546,0.00073429185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96580917,0.025970705,0.0023180014,0.0020803015,0.0028626688,0.0009591932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012745302,0.001281181,0.00141768,0.004492697,0.0015413044,0.008938369,0.0029184045,0.0018487014,0.010082012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043077312,0.00079126836,0.0018724691,0.0035336341,0.0053689056,0.013823457,0.0027668457,0.004393646,0.0010103221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001153381,0.000015749883,0.00021439715,0.00003594329,0.000014237195,0.000015094947,0.00008963275,0.004365765,0.000061225386,0.9901045,0.00046797347,0.004603956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044970143,0.000016572782,0.00014703737,0.00002721519,0.000009164115,0.000028665443,0.000046630066,0.020543922,0.000035462475,0.97783864,0.00129054,0.00001164806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006920657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006072541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012745302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030463443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012092319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06740445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171846995","doi":"10.5430/ijfr.v12n4p259","title":"The Impact of Corporate Performance on Mental Accounting and Loss Aversion in Financial Decisions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Financial Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mental accounting; Loss aversion; Accounting; Business; Real estate; Affect (linguistics); Financial accounting; Finance; Actuarial science; Accounting information system; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.275625826064391,"score_gpt":0.5087273663348035,"score_spread":0.23310154027041252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171846995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988061,0.000030229185,0.00009277359,0.00004288124,0.000004847239,0.0000053838667,0.0000071410136,0.0000016905132,0.0010089276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995747,0.000034042525,0.00013248148,0.000042856853,0.0000067731507,0.000004891189,0.000016811002,0.000001760143,0.0001856385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804854,0.0011200208,0.00009153227,0.00014478249,0.0003859449,0.00020915532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96095616,0.025582178,0.008045145,0.0018105798,0.0007815781,0.0028242734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028552834,0.00048670982,0.0003060166,0.00040742374,0.00030453867,0.0014761166,0.00018608235,0.0006249022,0.0018607909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022304932,0.00019178959,0.00031237272,0.00024666943,0.0009843155,0.00066053023,0.00076478743,0.0012207656,0.00019576708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013508545,0.010261946,0.83637685,0.00027729696,0.00065171625,0.0005954599,0.0043992777,0.004182839,0.062652834,0.0025036468,0.0005307929,0.06405886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106357336,0.0026767687,0.9898811,0.000028440436,0.000103108076,0.00011013954,0.00082451385,0.0017256447,0.0029324,0.0012237598,0.00033661744,0.00005116575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007695349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009491516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028552834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037279032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003327968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01510036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171916869","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2023.105645","title":"A central limit theorem, loss aversion and multi-armed bandits","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Key Research and Development Program of China; Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province","keywords":"Limit (mathematics); Central limit theorem; Risk aversion (psychology); Mathematical economics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematics; Focus (optics); Decision maker; Loss aversion; Interval (graph theory); Economics; Set (abstract data type); Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical analysis; Combinatorics; Statistics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.12073289912750154,"score_gpt":0.3876364178873946,"score_spread":0.26690351875989304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171916869","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016816009,0.003137349,0.96869826,0.0023071493,0.00026417186,0.00004672187,0.00011518987,0.00013401745,0.008481051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7767424,0.009639896,0.18319549,0.0013562259,0.0018119117,0.00063482823,0.0002885741,0.00031529364,0.026015509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99381304,0.0041326536,0.00024563537,0.0006551544,0.000756582,0.0003969703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95963687,0.034556687,0.0019754916,0.0012773027,0.0020052753,0.00054837886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015707586,0.002476855,0.004783666,0.0020834478,0.0014549446,0.006712283,0.003182231,0.0036988228,0.006283763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048994094,0.0016035188,0.0021704703,0.0027431925,0.00778135,0.0085512735,0.0033322242,0.005843685,0.000935053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013418899,0.00008879007,0.00073615764,0.00025073224,0.00021363041,0.00011890798,0.00017193111,0.15431537,0.000676047,0.8255312,0.0027097021,0.015053384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040182917,0.000039629835,0.00020624248,0.00005088683,0.000032313048,0.00004812156,0.000031373704,0.2930465,0.00014012033,0.70537555,0.0009462905,0.000042864045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026362538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001476111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015707586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020657317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023819061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083070636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173220302","doi":"10.5642/cguetd/222","title":"Essays in Behavioral, Health and Financial Economics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System; Feeling; Life satisfaction; Psychology; Stock (firearms); Behavioral economics; Social psychology; Unemployment; Matching (statistics); Stock market; Health and Retirement Study; Gerontology; Actuarial science; Economics; Public health; Medicine; Finance; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.12109112276881964,"score_gpt":0.43674413513822313,"score_spread":0.31565301236940346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173220302","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005162365,0.3788263,0.0064289975,0.33911377,0.06882683,0.00006459711,0.00063201017,0.00012357289,0.20082164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.077920005,0.38012084,0.005422985,0.072187595,0.17606764,0.00028331677,0.00082859024,0.0003145166,0.28685454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923325,0.00024506665,0.000057923735,0.000112366615,0.00027482383,0.00007658646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940644,0.004398529,0.00028096297,0.00019690525,0.0006912773,0.00036805746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020671654,0.0010727196,0.0009643758,0.0024149385,0.0015434677,0.0029711765,0.0007660737,0.002200423,0.020213502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007777437,0.00034120982,0.0010048111,0.0025362486,0.0027308397,0.0036932356,0.0011225931,0.0047030235,0.005211652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003671996,0.00011747149,0.0008965267,0.00049777003,0.000029794153,0.00009950925,0.0007511259,0.0005502274,0.00013115506,0.21573177,0.72588176,0.055276252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012334222,0.000033558666,0.0026700043,0.0009508158,0.000011576658,0.00011071125,0.0005074248,0.00042742048,0.000049607515,0.12330976,0.8719014,0.000015380067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023831532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017626188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020213502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031313582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001846851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06762093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174533914","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucac024","title":"The Influence of Budgets on Consumer Spending","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychographic; Compliance (psychology); Economics; Consumer behaviour; Consumer spending; Consumer expenditure; Behavioral economics; Marketing; Public economics; Business; Finance; Psychology; Aggregate expenditure; Social psychology; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.3370500657519823,"score_gpt":0.524397804116713,"score_spread":0.18734773836473068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174533914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934268,0.0000923995,0.0003079111,0.0001350635,0.0000046603677,0.000008164347,0.00007006293,0.0000065994554,0.0059483876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952865,0.000042492517,0.0001562459,0.000019320903,0.0000037011362,0.0000055837063,0.000033830755,0.0000035236017,0.0002067505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984059,0.0010485643,0.00006670609,0.00013786422,0.00022630408,0.00011478106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97333604,0.017161371,0.0061982353,0.0010977329,0.0011021954,0.0011044481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017466124,0.00020740299,0.0001989102,0.00063673593,0.00033870197,0.0016272871,0.00021345951,0.0003223526,0.003616996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017512642,0.0001688518,0.00020982747,0.0005757616,0.0006706278,0.0005757196,0.0005148702,0.0006148961,0.00020529641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014228412,0.00087401934,0.94255483,0.00013226044,0.0003311865,0.0001818661,0.0038544491,0.0027779627,0.0041872906,0.004796713,0.0010751359,0.037811413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018964323,0.00018711547,0.9922998,0.000030598618,0.00006607563,0.00004609256,0.0014197325,0.002236491,0.0006796157,0.0017769595,0.001215464,0.000023144567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005740457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068265535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005740457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009862328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041604965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012100041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3178845484","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/yn5r2","title":"Risky Choice and Memory for Effort: Hard Work Stands Out","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Actuarial science; Action (physics); Work (physics); Computer science; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.22471795304849454,"score_gpt":0.42998179886202775,"score_spread":0.2052638458135332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3178845484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98907465,0.0006813542,0.0056447745,0.00028973364,0.000024155284,0.000017825876,0.000084161045,0.00001848743,0.004164836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970471,0.00023003212,0.0016305987,0.00008205215,0.000024349803,0.000015219736,0.00007437643,0.000010246484,0.0008859048],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920076,0.00019572205,0.000073051364,0.00020362783,0.00022511772,0.00010175117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922431,0.0033521513,0.0021103898,0.0011355245,0.00040396367,0.0007548593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023578485,0.0005638239,0.0006243486,0.00091173936,0.0003973129,0.0021745926,0.0005347311,0.0008484485,0.005693633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015556152,0.00036135523,0.00044729776,0.0005751273,0.0011835966,0.0027190347,0.0013769082,0.00098999,0.0004008126],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004958503,0.001552424,0.6326933,0.0006898912,0.00083141605,0.0011644141,0.005500177,0.0073334645,0.05265366,0.030512897,0.0016067964,0.2605031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114885705,0.0015220862,0.86712027,0.00019429394,0.00026480964,0.0011032305,0.001587737,0.01051722,0.009434738,0.10511539,0.0028406177,0.0001847936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082262617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007571883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005693633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032993563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026843345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019047141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183017283","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3873427","title":"Simultaneous Learning of Perceptual Ambiguity and Expected Value Estimates Alter Preferences, Discrimination Performance, and Choice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Perception; Cognitive psychology; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Statistics; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Computer science; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.04533264389809971,"score_gpt":0.3439252199320242,"score_spread":0.2985925760339245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183017283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99543273,0.00006742399,0.002974024,0.00013561697,0.000037708563,0.000008462039,0.00002288809,0.000028161614,0.0012930281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973273,0.00006499139,0.0018504228,0.000083815656,0.000019256102,0.000010834989,0.00003746338,0.00003336746,0.0005725767],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883634,0.00026928692,0.000075713215,0.00033477135,0.00032970347,0.00015421092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98738074,0.008029663,0.0021188115,0.001303343,0.00023212042,0.00093534274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018003372,0.0005890033,0.0008044917,0.00039708137,0.00022284726,0.002677934,0.00064729585,0.0014263054,0.0045935255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018227967,0.0006641485,0.00038067228,0.00029433856,0.0009467355,0.0015560774,0.0013412136,0.0023150381,0.00034748195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03318335,0.010248427,0.13340269,0.000526904,0.0010410706,0.0009887302,0.0012861354,0.021737479,0.60667783,0.013932502,0.0015167892,0.17545813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023509476,0.013957604,0.46736285,0.00014248845,0.0011036511,0.001664659,0.00091396214,0.23198617,0.14782308,0.12940463,0.002860534,0.00042933595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040224358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041411573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045935255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034507056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058853807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015366852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186286161","doi":"","title":"Making Progress on the Effort Paradox: Progress Information Moderates Cognitive Demand Avoidance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Army Research Office; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Task (project management); Information processing; Social psychology; Economics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.07587271996073992,"score_gpt":0.32921525826423753,"score_spread":0.2533425383034976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186286161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946479,0.000037332957,0.0005293571,0.00020776116,0.000008880692,0.00000707048,0.000020553845,0.000008494227,0.0045325835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987488,0.000031729465,0.0003958639,0.00010180489,0.0000061651845,0.000010694747,0.000020601654,0.000008761817,0.0006754904],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993691,0.00030783782,0.000026336127,0.00011641574,0.00011284423,0.00006757368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99220616,0.0043995758,0.0015053237,0.0008806766,0.00019987165,0.0008083323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017522558,0.00027885337,0.00035104062,0.00026576337,0.00040774216,0.0019489921,0.0002943871,0.00072961766,0.006714557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0101765,0.00027889592,0.00019102452,0.00017966804,0.0007943549,0.0010433526,0.0013248104,0.0011945827,0.0002928215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019278618,0.01672362,0.33807492,0.0011095518,0.0009406859,0.0016513142,0.021947986,0.013270638,0.39951238,0.06284012,0.006704056,0.117946126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079561316,0.0033402636,0.8884956,0.000124179,0.00041287404,0.00032841475,0.0036301159,0.024840144,0.010879557,0.06109913,0.005865488,0.00018856452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007126844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008222555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006714557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027500314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030308377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022462428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186295407","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104154","title":"Retrospective and prospective hindsight bias: Replications and extensions of Fischhoff (1975) and Slovic and Fischhoff (1977)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Hindsight bias; Psychology; Replication (statistics); Debiasing; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14643696357332456,"score_gpt":0.4601383078492517,"score_spread":0.3137013442759271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186295407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76180476,0.01177029,0.17757122,0.005227355,0.0014685632,0.0035187935,0.0034490838,0.00046565384,0.034724228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9440535,0.0019421724,0.046221476,0.001424526,0.0007458429,0.000943645,0.0009523273,0.00010786939,0.0036086712],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98666,0.0070652436,0.0010529492,0.0029208267,0.0019808712,0.00032015677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.40214673,0.42397276,0.021271417,0.12034965,0.029873086,0.002386249],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07668934,0.0013289948,0.0015321049,0.0017926559,0.0013828079,0.0028259687,0.0045156106,0.0025383364,0.012673604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37823293,0.00085737486,0.0028940511,0.0019739743,0.0033386506,0.006087185,0.002242562,0.0027059475,0.0015821168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025271883,0.008084502,0.30580968,0.0030224642,0.0054965373,0.0015498758,0.020232268,0.0108082695,0.009267182,0.17983516,0.017179588,0.41344258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052616918,0.0050510266,0.31507504,0.0010664685,0.0065809796,0.0026303953,0.005903581,0.064145505,0.013508237,0.55615747,0.023882097,0.0007375013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010115413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057119215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92331064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012144488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002115197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40557683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186408120","doi":"","title":"A Unified, Resource-Rational Account of the Allais and Ellsberg Paradoxes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rationality; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics; Decision theory; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05044557053754595,"score_gpt":0.2872208121346794,"score_spread":0.23677524159713348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186408120","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.111150846,0.0049164183,0.62838197,0.03855727,0.0004030874,0.00016677596,0.00048426597,0.00028056232,0.21565878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96438396,0.0011563995,0.028294718,0.0011748604,0.00021772657,0.00008820924,0.000086409054,0.00005050916,0.0045472034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957338,0.0019164287,0.00020262272,0.00059053104,0.0011879886,0.00036865642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994031,0.0031710835,0.0007212522,0.0010814575,0.00062766473,0.0003673949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007840473,0.0008859683,0.0012545269,0.0016714735,0.0014633985,0.0060375812,0.0023604108,0.0030762998,0.0053027775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015027997,0.00039179667,0.0010231662,0.0012205575,0.0073883473,0.01213756,0.0037498572,0.003914318,0.00045783038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071873956,0.000009817664,0.00012785802,0.000009530129,0.0000059208915,0.000016570146,0.00010244583,0.0019937647,0.000029275743,0.99550503,0.00041142604,0.0017811164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042605084,0.0000026370774,0.000079040154,0.0000062938316,0.0000026037633,0.000009387561,0.00003197091,0.0038779334,0.000015323218,0.9952821,0.0006846082,0.0000038163785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00201514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017955346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007840473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025111053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026885646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041464865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186539350","doi":"10.18559/ebr.2021.2.2","title":"Escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. Failed replication and extension of Staw (1976)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Business Review/˜The œPoznań University of Economics Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Escalation of commitment; Psychology; Cognition; Numeracy; Social psychology; Test (biology); Replicate; Reflection (computer programming); Pedagogy","score_opus":0.10819323199258794,"score_gpt":0.34520719616570056,"score_spread":0.2370139641731126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186539350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88415146,0.040574923,0.020034961,0.0038384376,0.00028472242,0.00044341388,0.00042074654,0.000080040205,0.050171334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98511535,0.007866137,0.0037631097,0.00047108074,0.00006694589,0.00015554807,0.00016678995,0.000024411975,0.002370702],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945411,0.0022061076,0.00048163426,0.00086716865,0.0017292538,0.00017471156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90498626,0.065549776,0.015833043,0.008136157,0.004514878,0.0009798142],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011598679,0.00016047434,0.0005999486,0.0009115761,0.00029991756,0.0012784506,0.0006286079,0.00050365354,0.003235225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07044062,0.00026699185,0.0007815902,0.001124398,0.001298635,0.0011885031,0.0012533672,0.0013917609,0.0003488328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018629113,0.0005802334,0.23203829,0.0052680196,0.0016342272,0.00035757135,0.004076028,0.00070115976,0.0084406845,0.023686176,0.0021636472,0.7191911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071496426,0.001200771,0.959645,0.000874941,0.00045666404,0.00086960796,0.0008874299,0.00069478364,0.00364849,0.018730134,0.012854964,0.00006574172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013873561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015335447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9884013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005551071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010422951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06134039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187466351","doi":"10.7554/elife.67387.sa2","title":"Author response: The role of ventromedial prefrontal cortex in reward valuation and future thinking during intertemporal choice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ventromedial prefrontal cortex; Prefrontal cortex; Neuroscience; Valuation (finance); Consumer neuroscience; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Economics","score_opus":0.10142801138577899,"score_gpt":0.41507450618347214,"score_spread":0.31364649479769313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187466351","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008857191,0.0015933814,0.0020087098,0.78456455,0.1505566,0.000115537056,0.0010492731,0.0002459348,0.051008794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11127654,0.0034906128,0.0027332527,0.19279005,0.058374956,0.00018738043,0.0010431177,0.00044724075,0.6296568],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842167,0.0003618456,0.00009245873,0.00020348655,0.0007788476,0.00014167336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95989096,0.016128361,0.0011236739,0.0012447945,0.019287936,0.0023241967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003168374,0.00030230457,0.00044069343,0.00054202817,0.0010808047,0.0017468769,0.00066784257,0.0043585273,0.096666165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05772421,0.00015345262,0.0002666901,0.00033946178,0.0009345427,0.0009948025,0.00097264175,0.0028710875,0.01821611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020155135,0.000020437818,0.00077609695,0.00013412368,0.000019222876,0.00032854275,0.00023536454,0.000109835186,0.0007924365,0.0030699414,0.9760611,0.018251326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009843166,0.0000838741,0.005854237,0.00019408803,0.000030073088,0.0006696455,0.0010628471,0.00060066784,0.0018284906,0.008921705,0.9806065,0.00004953336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030016191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006420411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096666165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001376174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025172243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32338053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187642658","doi":"","title":"Unclaimed Prize Information Biases Perceptions of Winning in Scratch Card Gambling","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Scratch; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Perception; Advertising; Equating; Social psychology; Computer science; Business; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.09505840821841158,"score_gpt":0.40094134935706,"score_spread":0.30588294113864845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187642658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99881625,0.000032952412,0.00025646642,0.000019412502,0.0000061717546,0.000009619523,0.000010306236,0.000004713371,0.00084408594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991855,0.000033328815,0.00048125265,0.00004277954,0.0000045083198,0.000009746212,0.000017861079,0.0000047757417,0.00022023467],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886835,0.0004403921,0.00007039734,0.00018213977,0.00035334314,0.00008552298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99389255,0.0037958582,0.0012044181,0.0004891801,0.0002278738,0.00039021397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018145597,0.00029515853,0.0002890195,0.00028342227,0.00022689426,0.001141483,0.00022893169,0.00070568733,0.0028302127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01332071,0.00029153205,0.0001919116,0.00010695761,0.0007833089,0.0007101399,0.00077331526,0.000597658,0.00017826585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014558927,0.0030607174,0.47974643,0.0012174204,0.00043327978,0.0008806866,0.026871208,0.0024496715,0.39119536,0.0027697755,0.0010660354,0.07575046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012923473,0.0020724265,0.9780899,0.000103119644,0.00015895203,0.00030974313,0.0036443935,0.0028253705,0.009492034,0.0019859504,0.0010853463,0.000103578146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012034286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018062845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028302127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001875918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015511882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009596407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193439024","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/h8prg","title":"Efficient Coding and Risky Choice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Semtech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Stochastic game; Lottery; Coding (social sciences); Perception; Mathematical economics; Decision maker; Economics; Regular polygon; Computer science; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Psychology; Operations research; Statistics","score_opus":0.22266381831301854,"score_gpt":0.4113413905840159,"score_spread":0.18867757227099738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193439024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9591237,0.00008591052,0.034228213,0.00030505133,0.000013492782,0.000044176497,0.00008308054,0.000042206564,0.006074135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957151,0.00003163577,0.0038052874,0.000054815184,0.000005262877,0.000022196265,0.0000405996,0.000008552283,0.00031673914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977416,0.000916668,0.00014029702,0.0003579864,0.0006610129,0.00018230511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719064,0.018801361,0.004664472,0.0032647587,0.0005940495,0.00076898304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003182733,0.00047332683,0.00046252733,0.00047373844,0.00021340273,0.0015046564,0.00059119397,0.0007891633,0.0036821945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025766496,0.00030240606,0.00032900713,0.00032200737,0.0015281156,0.0015361403,0.0012838305,0.001143424,0.00028460313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006183446,0.0036795316,0.11848339,0.0007726348,0.000515676,0.0005586288,0.0022793424,0.12134201,0.28201786,0.3161913,0.0021756866,0.14580049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004339799,0.0028816904,0.1297494,0.00007705018,0.00013941251,0.00056332094,0.00037581334,0.3292125,0.053315688,0.48028067,0.0027919821,0.00017852469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054915773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041494222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036821945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007982376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004297036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016832113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195157048","doi":"10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.08.004","title":"Optimal reinsurance under the α-maxmin mean-variance criterion","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insurance Mathematics and Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Ambiguity; Reinsurance; Minimax; Variance (accounting); Preference; Ambiguity aversion; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical economics; Economics; Econometrics; Range (aeronautics); Mathematics; Microeconomics; Actuarial science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09917736626442714,"score_gpt":0.34546154272203133,"score_spread":0.2462841764576042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195157048","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17988288,0.0013809633,0.80433327,0.0033004587,0.00014035687,0.000112649526,0.00022810082,0.00051265163,0.010108654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9497217,0.00051673816,0.045515977,0.0002525066,0.00015144856,0.00009308106,0.00012782849,0.00011628144,0.0035043552],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970528,0.0016404133,0.0001284923,0.0003452124,0.00039746438,0.0004355902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888868,0.008531169,0.00065694214,0.0004806869,0.000995608,0.00044870327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008096433,0.0011911546,0.0026377486,0.0009109661,0.00067369273,0.0023609968,0.0013401239,0.0018690749,0.002369122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021029158,0.0005964445,0.0006492981,0.0006550277,0.001360766,0.0025659623,0.0016441997,0.0015836615,0.0002986897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010804449,0.00036428747,0.003260499,0.00035074202,0.00018576764,0.00017262636,0.0002201639,0.55762786,0.005688351,0.35492444,0.006898394,0.069226384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047388887,0.00017652453,0.0010696945,0.000051556002,0.00003135086,0.00007308547,0.00004357321,0.8639741,0.0016343282,0.13229969,0.0005734289,0.000025271229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001550348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008930452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008096433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014387963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029457633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042818487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195225210","doi":"10.22215/etd/2014-10349","title":"Individual Differences Influence the Degree of Source Expertise Bias in Syllogistic Reasoning","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Syllogism; Psychology; Debiasing; Reflection (computer programming); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.3110407190417193,"score_gpt":0.4111068290434165,"score_spread":0.10006611000169718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195225210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984706,0.000035913206,0.00018580166,0.000027986574,0.000006214392,0.000009225692,0.000013512827,0.0000036428225,0.0012470667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988972,0.00004177243,0.00041342524,0.000027113592,0.000006742712,0.000010533921,0.000029171926,0.000012737879,0.000561253],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986608,0.00055345724,0.00012544564,0.00024894747,0.00030913277,0.00010207863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96553814,0.026478559,0.0032804569,0.0023550969,0.0009802637,0.001367336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025835445,0.00015861186,0.00023606828,0.00047541404,0.00017219844,0.00095005,0.00021336834,0.0004130725,0.003659864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031555943,0.0002442044,0.00012627924,0.00026342412,0.0005721552,0.00052550744,0.0004701239,0.00060210726,0.0003849407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025028212,0.008657841,0.51006067,0.00033596612,0.00074296125,0.0007889383,0.013091341,0.0028409772,0.31281808,0.0030713587,0.0015483609,0.12101523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002644611,0.0014416309,0.97275543,0.0000347151,0.000140503,0.0005228184,0.0009679345,0.0037456753,0.016075686,0.0032110875,0.00078861054,0.000051385116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074755657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010150109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003659864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020817785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019541386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013663292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195747619","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104866","title":"Reasoning strategy vs cognitive capacity as predictors of individual differences in reasoning performance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Probabilistic logic; Cognitive strategy; Verbal reasoning; Inference; Task (project management); Bayesian inference; Neglect; Bayesian probability; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.14444953941990485,"score_gpt":0.35540569572792713,"score_spread":0.21095615630802228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195747619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993393,0.000048231646,0.000070346025,0.000022573078,0.000004194886,0.0000040113828,0.000054080025,0.000003137848,0.00045423768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994286,0.000028672986,0.00012264395,0.000012231753,0.0000061716228,0.0000064181277,0.000090270936,0.0000056283693,0.00029936008],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992963,0.00022096347,0.0000739871,0.00014975925,0.00012383243,0.00013504548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762521,0.017684788,0.0026428162,0.0011465389,0.00046366832,0.0018101701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002203719,0.0004981775,0.00047250817,0.001033648,0.000272199,0.001955465,0.0004461899,0.0015099044,0.0044755274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01487992,0.00032868012,0.0005169035,0.0007137821,0.0006570159,0.0010355376,0.00060466497,0.0011997557,0.0006807613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002977095,0.0014160166,0.9806966,0.000035848054,0.00059767155,0.00018934306,0.00074620615,0.0020426766,0.004722561,0.00041322462,0.00015908622,0.0060035964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040579736,0.00046852566,0.9936745,0.000008121576,0.000100705234,0.00017769776,0.00022957036,0.0035609389,0.0006094597,0.0009904618,0.00012038467,0.000019037143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012269445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001198105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044755274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001846794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032484965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01497215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196651021","doi":"10.5167/uzh-205562","title":"Evaluating deliberative competence: a simple method with an application to financial choice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Statistic; Competence (human resources); Scope (computer science); Quality (philosophy); Psychological intervention; Actuarial science; Computer science; Simple (philosophy); Risk analysis (engineering); Management science; Psychology; Economics; Business; Mathematics; Social psychology; Statistics","score_opus":0.10856754775166595,"score_gpt":0.41931267990820664,"score_spread":0.3107451321565407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196651021","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005283049,0.00008682064,0.99106836,0.00031282345,0.00004072319,0.00061196653,0.0001858136,0.00024201332,0.002168377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08280505,0.0001147565,0.91281664,0.0001381271,0.000046995472,0.0029241578,0.00010008649,0.000091900765,0.0009622364],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.973125,0.02018246,0.0012587269,0.0018673547,0.003345222,0.00022119118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84798175,0.12798876,0.005785082,0.01248389,0.004721624,0.0010388608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02430634,0.0013272112,0.0014458081,0.0038534738,0.0009926911,0.00265086,0.0018936195,0.002273572,0.0115341395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14655875,0.0006846801,0.0016010915,0.0035347105,0.0046860795,0.004255553,0.0042772214,0.0032590944,0.001370867],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007161705,0.0010428979,0.01467237,0.001383132,0.0005805381,0.00024505015,0.0024023245,0.026253516,0.007260323,0.41208813,0.005530349,0.5278252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041669744,0.0010924874,0.009129175,0.00039921876,0.00018129889,0.00041289238,0.00044874713,0.19816366,0.006007761,0.7668448,0.016590018,0.0003132349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013846126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016804457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02430634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013421548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002113151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12854576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197565229","doi":"10.1167/jov.21.9.2920","title":"Decreases loom larger than increases: A perceptual account for loss aversion","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Numerosity adaptation effect; Perception; Psychology; Asymmetry; Loss aversion; Audiology; Contrast (vision); Mathematics; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Physics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.08370552187857169,"score_gpt":0.4099889928868475,"score_spread":0.3262834710082758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197565229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9489466,0.0005063932,0.03944703,0.0010553964,0.00011593628,0.000056903424,0.00010781476,0.00019855869,0.009565451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99208844,0.000086789165,0.006826542,0.00035290822,0.000023830857,0.000030076224,0.000033594173,0.000033684515,0.00052406144],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992951,0.0001482491,0.000052020434,0.00018397962,0.00024037174,0.00008017814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700326,0.0009877525,0.000854355,0.0006108986,0.000305845,0.00023791422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012257746,0.00037124756,0.00030129723,0.00045560198,0.00024275697,0.0010534709,0.00049588986,0.0006792529,0.0039124982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007721047,0.00036007562,0.00045364082,0.00016033807,0.00095265673,0.00173992,0.0013505863,0.0010161012,0.0003055449],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038745825,0.0004325184,0.05730452,0.00048511702,0.00020917179,0.0010827526,0.0022997526,0.0046782675,0.81430197,0.026665526,0.0016668774,0.08699899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007037846,0.003067009,0.69510823,0.00019370807,0.00037469759,0.0033700538,0.001194895,0.06362283,0.08811147,0.13778573,0.006154298,0.00031329348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059484324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043476807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039124982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033124452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021744653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013088644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203492635","doi":"10.1037/dev0001226","title":"Hindsight bias and false-belief reasoning from preschool to old age.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Developmental Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Hindsight bias; Psychology; False belief; Developmental psychology; Theory of mind; Cognitive development; Cognitive psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.20276103245079985,"score_gpt":0.42923391078912787,"score_spread":0.22647287833832802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203492635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99891496,0.00022911553,0.00010477366,0.000028355698,0.0000039484453,0.0000059239956,0.00014273971,0.000005287646,0.0005649143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990409,0.00011903341,0.00025010615,0.000024271758,0.0000030910917,0.000009905908,0.00018829088,0.0000018615456,0.00036256018],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999642,0.000043124313,0.000043598375,0.00009714767,0.00012069141,0.000053390802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99176735,0.0020385783,0.0044569974,0.0005110046,0.0007374782,0.00048863114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016091288,0.00033889787,0.00025578783,0.0007522295,0.00028068182,0.00090975827,0.00040023203,0.0004539949,0.0017356565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013443311,0.00026606026,0.00023495476,0.0003228681,0.0004981969,0.0009275414,0.0006061918,0.00066694064,0.00028597645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023598537,0.00019283796,0.97847146,0.000049648497,0.000036237532,0.00036415775,0.003275117,0.00008798514,0.0016564785,0.00015163895,0.00036256632,0.015115995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054440834,0.00013896858,0.9976398,0.000013748643,0.00001579635,0.00049086835,0.00059289247,0.00010447299,0.00045611255,0.00030599706,0.00022904399,0.0000069107664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071730944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014576543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071730944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048729917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039494722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014262676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205897733","doi":"10.3390/jrfm14100490","title":"Behavioral Decision Making in Normative and Descriptive Views: A Critical Review of Literature","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Ambiguity; Underpinning; Management science; Psychology; Decision theory; Decision analysis; Behavioral economics; Loss aversion; Normative model of decision-making; Computer science; Epistemology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.1475315296025813,"score_gpt":0.4533514488544466,"score_spread":0.3058199192518653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205897733","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018738022,0.9946719,0.00079016556,0.00312852,0.00032013396,0.0000077612585,0.0000140066595,0.0000049720443,0.00087525684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049383426,0.9920087,0.0009557314,0.0012585612,0.0006394979,0.000027301836,0.000025631905,0.000005399022,0.00014089323],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99540246,0.0020534846,0.0006241809,0.00048298668,0.0012834786,0.00015348729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9537356,0.040065993,0.0013318871,0.0004921689,0.00406462,0.00030976857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011517922,0.0012113982,0.0024204717,0.008549571,0.0008987829,0.003954352,0.001756182,0.00307204,0.0026413791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025512453,0.00071287935,0.00096343213,0.008356036,0.0046455683,0.007814136,0.0013922567,0.0048694597,0.0007907878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010617441,0.00009456678,0.00077814294,0.04359148,0.00029560702,0.00015867689,0.001314949,0.0011734916,0.0002875098,0.12032774,0.03402134,0.7978503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036220797,0.00014418668,0.0035720733,0.1022585,0.0005023849,0.00082630484,0.002947436,0.0010925104,0.00042741685,0.16726537,0.72076964,0.0001580708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032368123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041602897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011517922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040788874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005900395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060913324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207220179","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104934","title":"The effects of cueing episodic future thinking on delay discounting in children, adolescents, and adults","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Psychology; Delay of gratification; Delay discounting; Gratification; Discounting; Intertemporal choice; Temporal discounting; Developmental psychology; Affect (linguistics); Trait; Value (mathematics); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Social psychology; Impulsivity","score_opus":0.016490195087892796,"score_gpt":0.3043624066559573,"score_spread":0.28787221156806453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207220179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996575,0.00008133809,0.000012837659,0.00001707733,0.0000021523558,0.0000019664408,0.000028204751,9.324737e-7,0.00019810759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994831,0.00014118929,0.00009483693,0.000016743259,0.000004247115,0.000005673705,0.00006676361,0.0000025361023,0.00018493699],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996817,0.00007149738,0.000026541013,0.00006128076,0.00009459353,0.000064340624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991651,0.0047849542,0.0018149023,0.00038182957,0.00034470664,0.0010225746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011073975,0.0003203725,0.00031901195,0.0003763093,0.00023750594,0.0010514781,0.00025463785,0.00048249727,0.0013116628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0087590935,0.00030458745,0.00032152055,0.00028199403,0.00061715505,0.0004313043,0.00041145057,0.0012455697,0.00014581085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004144484,0.0020724805,0.9665766,0.00009002423,0.00015454333,0.0002859382,0.0029483233,0.00036147336,0.006891295,0.0003829083,0.00024237376,0.01584959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048987888,0.0008187713,0.9965341,0.000013063455,0.00007410472,0.00013570268,0.0005328553,0.00028765158,0.0011212333,0.00023305112,0.00018874423,0.000011834725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00466605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066816476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00466605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038892642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039218325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009277821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208397276","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1048207/v1","title":"The globalizability of temporal discounting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; McGill University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Discounting; Economics; Econometrics; Finance","score_opus":0.34270716156599124,"score_gpt":0.5597152017425966,"score_spread":0.21700804017660535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208397276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96211374,0.0005567965,0.022755539,0.00043509435,0.000044813834,0.000030553412,0.00038040156,0.000032605494,0.013650416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869174,0.000078196455,0.0009310907,0.000022696388,0.000010363443,0.0000047665308,0.00005930384,0.00000782367,0.00019404429],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877506,0.0004775948,0.00010044757,0.00032655816,0.00026191582,0.000058364458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96244127,0.022718074,0.00739606,0.0050098062,0.001879898,0.0005549198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004640879,0.00025804748,0.00034012442,0.000650881,0.00017797833,0.0013261726,0.00036749354,0.00026840146,0.004616938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03815919,0.00015763304,0.00033603868,0.0008388635,0.0010826086,0.0013453708,0.0007169163,0.0010245645,0.000113194976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028357834,0.00021257426,0.7313907,0.00042927402,0.00089659676,0.0004050973,0.0041452325,0.015131792,0.0112957815,0.09429969,0.0012145598,0.13774295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105036976,0.0005607093,0.68697846,0.0001876967,0.00039879695,0.0007310949,0.0023530826,0.040923987,0.0071127657,0.25620124,0.004332567,0.00011465094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002739446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015838651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004640879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004338945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018926717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024543583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209539600","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4007866","title":"Replication package for: Stochastic Revealed Preferences with Measurement Error","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.34519049537582386,"score_gpt":0.36199735507997255,"score_spread":0.01680685970414869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209539600","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045815976,0.0005469369,0.32294872,0.001909264,0.003913681,0.006042247,0.61475044,0.032766454,0.012540631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.066226274,0.0005754878,0.5046525,0.0018511213,0.00087474845,0.07725314,0.26293495,0.053738236,0.03189351],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845598,0.00832276,0.0016789014,0.0030242668,0.0018787155,0.0005355092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90632737,0.042752698,0.0032558679,0.038343944,0.00845798,0.00086215866],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025543263,0.0026444283,0.003164545,0.0026526558,0.0015803289,0.0032927352,0.0041809254,0.0024007761,0.36254826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20488796,0.0022355937,0.005117348,0.004620426,0.0011593496,0.0026020145,0.0031533795,0.0048756907,0.117004596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011826694,0.00013701992,0.0027721939,0.003793359,0.0016678615,0.0002703549,0.0005732186,0.0034107054,0.0010812454,0.01874218,0.90421396,0.062155254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049825897,0.0004491039,0.012357209,0.0016598457,0.0017134687,0.00071386184,0.0002692752,0.012580695,0.0035943477,0.10507375,0.85610473,0.00050114497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051616356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005010358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011454915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047555673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9092475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209547369","doi":"","title":"Endogenous Risk Attitudes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Decision maker; Risk perception; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Weighting; Prospect theory; Lottery; Limit (mathematics); Function (biology); Psychology; Economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Management science","score_opus":0.10336993199991618,"score_gpt":0.3698981964218558,"score_spread":0.2665282644219396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209547369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59464955,0.00033954738,0.33854914,0.0043231067,0.00009028474,0.00012363833,0.0004119857,0.0001778013,0.06133496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847703,0.00008513352,0.009456521,0.00019115407,0.000017419894,0.000049815706,0.000039075112,0.00001060321,0.0053800116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936527,0.00024147911,0.000019022787,0.00014448325,0.00013621546,0.000093541435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781585,0.0010117535,0.00040800447,0.00032500393,0.00020364427,0.00023578832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011502786,0.0004679818,0.00037366772,0.00042924428,0.0003417139,0.0024608208,0.0006588685,0.001115052,0.006553288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006921908,0.00026789398,0.0005000762,0.00035383593,0.0011131151,0.0017903706,0.0009349768,0.0015512214,0.00068293524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033877871,0.0003652561,0.013839878,0.00009379877,0.00010942868,0.0003656229,0.0013641239,0.05857461,0.006970004,0.88308454,0.0016981969,0.03319573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104269435,0.00026082442,0.008489011,0.000040996103,0.00009223728,0.00027243336,0.00032889078,0.22429141,0.0016803752,0.76096606,0.0033993335,0.00007424724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096254726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005308211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006553288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009411434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047172175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021922946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210758287","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-12-816636-9.00011-6","title":"Development of the ability to detect and override miserly information processing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Information processing; Psychology; Information processing theory; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Heuristic; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06707639137507482,"score_gpt":0.32918162999994055,"score_spread":0.26210523862486573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210758287","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04218229,0.0016780134,0.8630095,0.003350726,0.0004277049,0.0001501459,0.00027790008,0.0025567864,0.08636697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32561132,0.0027375228,0.624057,0.0013026752,0.00020939531,0.00018954635,0.0003184504,0.0002950415,0.04527904],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995789,0.000066816945,0.000030328836,0.00012910934,0.00015376437,0.000041059182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99580234,0.0024315277,0.00024359016,0.00063520874,0.00074171834,0.0001456238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016873097,0.00058341,0.000304496,0.0006243989,0.00020862612,0.0027146612,0.0014174249,0.0014492101,0.007702933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063903974,0.0004526236,0.0003894022,0.00039687136,0.001721531,0.0035920935,0.001073088,0.0016616912,0.003761684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001436338,0.00024148096,0.0028010507,0.0003289399,0.000077299665,0.00025497837,0.0006953806,0.0084882025,0.07700958,0.2470792,0.013447211,0.649433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000632155,0.00050876645,0.005891619,0.00026294778,0.00010854879,0.0011586458,0.00031090854,0.22152252,0.1506528,0.44273135,0.17666288,0.00012587439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011789128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062919856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007702933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046730842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010488139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025768936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211629106","doi":"10.2308/tar-2020-0305","title":"The Beneficial Learning Effects of Combining a Hypothesis-Testing Mindset with a Causal Model","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Accounting Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Causal model; Control (management); Causal analysis; Psychology; Computer science; Econometrics; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.12877444529769258,"score_gpt":0.36143604372151283,"score_spread":0.23266159842382025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211629106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95767134,0.000547602,0.016327351,0.0056402516,0.00019852056,0.0003919867,0.00021883212,0.00032004644,0.018684043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857928,0.00016570136,0.012623249,0.00043215996,0.00008963084,0.00020338956,0.0000843938,0.00001908926,0.00058944954],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779198,0.016468553,0.0013795106,0.001092398,0.0027237886,0.00041596952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.36563963,0.5513117,0.043129835,0.028447088,0.0075879665,0.00388387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0370617,0.00056349457,0.00060950796,0.0009729689,0.00076958333,0.0026755228,0.0011137384,0.0016574621,0.0111808935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2639972,0.0005696168,0.00063698756,0.0007326087,0.0019121615,0.0032300993,0.0022431912,0.002958599,0.0006548136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012639089,0.01735057,0.25925338,0.0047362265,0.0012974651,0.00044348612,0.0062403525,0.056141768,0.025656644,0.052949913,0.009688826,0.5536023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049905977,0.021825416,0.5327589,0.0028920686,0.0028890844,0.00069441093,0.0035497106,0.1645825,0.031528767,0.20668334,0.026891047,0.0007141393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061953004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009709067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0370617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016070687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011424582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19600338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216246799","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101443","title":"Hypothesis testing, attention, and ‘Same’-‘Different’ judgments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Converse; Psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Perception; Set (abstract data type); Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.3584158466734584,"score_gpt":0.4618216681543257,"score_spread":0.1034058214808673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216246799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91023725,0.0019642352,0.06974334,0.0045048143,0.00030391567,0.00012506358,0.00005735419,0.00021816012,0.012845855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883555,0.00016288356,0.010322828,0.00044111742,0.000104486746,0.00005674348,0.000027441814,0.000022503466,0.0005064765],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859491,0.010284768,0.00044030976,0.0016333021,0.0013101416,0.00038235896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80721194,0.17832388,0.0076931156,0.003372995,0.0016629108,0.0017352244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027141556,0.00046552822,0.00080037565,0.0015640008,0.0008758841,0.002592837,0.0015441013,0.0015175244,0.0037623493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09235425,0.00034716143,0.0007652277,0.0009150391,0.0071575656,0.0037046382,0.0015236347,0.0018993394,0.00017824105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0067151184,0.0018631833,0.18988006,0.0016573708,0.0012582432,0.002946524,0.0063458155,0.011970895,0.0386256,0.31019536,0.003612383,0.4249294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051094906,0.0015265064,0.1344999,0.00010205336,0.00024680022,0.00090599415,0.0011429037,0.047559176,0.01252672,0.79841936,0.0024577335,0.00010201405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017976031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013214584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027141556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015778308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015155078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14353997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W322901492","doi":"","title":"Mental Simulation and Stability Over Time","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Trope (literature); Preference; Time preference; Stability (learning theory); Economics; Mental effort; Intertemporal choice; Task (project management); Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.05762878922459367,"score_gpt":0.38401916621792764,"score_spread":0.32639037699333395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W322901492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87501764,0.0014611578,0.056622796,0.0021673006,0.000064558386,0.000044619293,0.00031642124,0.0001515914,0.06415391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968065,0.00013505219,0.0020690216,0.000039779636,0.000013015946,0.000015074058,0.00011187169,0.000018671331,0.00079107704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879164,0.00043794367,0.000056752135,0.00036099597,0.00024182478,0.00011083525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98982483,0.0047351564,0.0018218757,0.001969644,0.0009787184,0.0006698399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021219957,0.00028176935,0.00038199936,0.0014341848,0.00073803606,0.003502841,0.00068352063,0.00089995307,0.007400982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030963091,0.00029254914,0.0005619625,0.0010681576,0.002468044,0.0048754015,0.002138145,0.0011663284,0.00045055908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011365843,0.0002874633,0.11731293,0.00026974923,0.00044712986,0.00042267208,0.013304976,0.040571094,0.0062268614,0.69036984,0.0027613696,0.1268894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007785483,0.00021863724,0.08757452,0.000070615635,0.00011454192,0.0004104757,0.0019161367,0.06618216,0.00097108964,0.8357402,0.006640242,0.00008339598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028975648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013095763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007400982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00123355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047953372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024758756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200056893","doi":"10.1109/iros51168.2021.9636479","title":"A Marginal Log-Likelihood Approach for the Estimation of Discount Factors of Multiple Experts in Inverse Reinforcement Learning","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Marginal likelihood; Computer science; Latent variable; Machine learning; Probabilistic logic; Hyperparameter; Expectation–maximization algorithm; Markov decision process; Artificial intelligence; Principle of maximum entropy; Reinforcement learning; Latent variable model; Likelihood function; Variable (mathematics); Markov process; Bayesian probability; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Maximum likelihood; Estimation theory; Statistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.21327069326339732,"score_gpt":0.3892692312640018,"score_spread":0.1759985380006045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200056893","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034138951,0.00008172862,0.9958747,0.00012942345,0.00000877043,0.000029311761,0.000020629222,0.00007741838,0.00036401948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5344641,0.00037211267,0.46031335,0.00029529605,0.000104321625,0.00051441614,0.00026339336,0.00022053908,0.003452456],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.997471,0.0015198195,0.0000901028,0.0003963087,0.00036275503,0.00016000641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920596,0.0061220713,0.0005949241,0.00037128857,0.00057365064,0.00027835227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061327885,0.0015457363,0.0019994103,0.0010274422,0.0004676502,0.0017319386,0.0032118491,0.0018527339,0.0033156467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02345035,0.0011719686,0.001171197,0.00093475636,0.0024083743,0.003218731,0.0022636608,0.0034464772,0.00053551735],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009388897,0.00006406177,0.00089418475,0.00010222828,0.00007071064,0.00009116927,0.00012814964,0.9327578,0.0007332251,0.03982279,0.0006939997,0.024547761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007709553,0.000023769027,0.00008501827,0.000011333044,0.0000061197684,0.000018343668,0.0000067153173,0.981199,0.00020693662,0.018193629,0.00023082056,0.0000105828885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034330545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029528292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061327885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021180343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021378319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03243363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200124202","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1283","title":"The wellbeing implications of maximizing: A conceptual framework and meta‐analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Outcome (game theory); Maximization; Process (computing); Focus (optics); Conceptual framework; Meta-analysis; Decision maker; Social psychology; Management science; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.24260888221096222,"score_gpt":0.47723490670550184,"score_spread":0.23462602449453962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200124202","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032007072,0.8803449,0.074247666,0.0053949645,0.0007754899,0.0029431833,0.0014880717,0.0002411948,0.0025573797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7873686,0.11812396,0.080124535,0.0024012672,0.00045062017,0.009990931,0.0010326274,0.00011180979,0.0003955769],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.8809795,0.09515124,0.012554212,0.004934111,0.005668497,0.0007124967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67584425,0.2940236,0.0140680745,0.010096945,0.005159511,0.0008075857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13810273,0.0028289482,0.007519704,0.014962089,0.0010872921,0.006303522,0.0036943727,0.0021919538,0.0023631216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26210722,0.001366015,0.026992003,0.012218493,0.00317633,0.0042612604,0.003873744,0.0031041896,0.0001600335],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012558182,0.0000978222,0.025018798,0.17114326,0.73819107,0.0002754107,0.0017612758,0.004254821,0.0006812331,0.014852974,0.0014141118,0.041053373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006466003,0.0007341084,0.014444008,0.05316861,0.87937945,0.00025709363,0.0010045082,0.004710519,0.0009875617,0.036571387,0.007957067,0.00013907865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024517996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003726071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13810273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031705452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00391922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73036575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200311074","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12794","title":"Teaching &amp; learning guide for: Risky‐choice framing and rational decision‐making","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Framing effect; Prospect theory; Framing (construction); Expected utility hypothesis; Decision theory; Decision field theory; Evidential decision theory; Empirical research; Rationality; Epistemology; Decision analysis; Psychology; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Social psychology; Economics; Decision engineering; Business decision mapping; Microeconomics; Persuasion","score_opus":0.15259550135196523,"score_gpt":0.43255974557467985,"score_spread":0.2799642442227146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200311074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00097101554,0.021563893,0.04721364,0.059185393,0.012135589,0.0007952393,0.008666286,0.010450642,0.83901834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058474033,0.015283035,0.03589039,0.012869993,0.0027556228,0.0009810833,0.0036315406,0.0034436008,0.9192974],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995976,0.00011685965,0.00002817177,0.0000635972,0.0001476267,0.00004616323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975224,0.0012444525,0.00010032407,0.00018231687,0.00057295477,0.000377568],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009790754,0.0015276516,0.001043371,0.0014429779,0.0010930222,0.0035922336,0.0018215264,0.0028468054,0.45558232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057592527,0.0006228342,0.0007209147,0.0015467891,0.0011909459,0.0063162944,0.0024326653,0.003542532,0.33180586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012574827,0.000031579366,0.00006915833,0.00011333785,0.0000014295962,0.00005865686,0.00012432043,0.000080345424,0.00007580467,0.0065428196,0.8997979,0.09309209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011492286,0.000011776952,0.00022109781,0.00017387597,9.824677e-7,0.000071894574,0.000085541054,0.00016947744,0.00007535938,0.012655672,0.9865154,0.000007498826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043507726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00769592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45558232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015754296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00229949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77654576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200495547","doi":"10.22230/src.2021v12n1a381","title":"Lecture 10: Rhetoric and Behavioral Economics","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Rhetoric; Humanities; Gens; Sociology; Positive economics; Welfare economics; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.31860779150733626,"score_gpt":0.49729334940272496,"score_spread":0.1786855578953887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200495547","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006830271,0.050718393,0.029803466,0.48460448,0.032429565,0.00008151852,0.00025005103,0.00019860348,0.3950837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31907654,0.0735448,0.03007075,0.10217249,0.07308828,0.0003930605,0.000517102,0.00048266648,0.4006544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713033,0.0015140009,0.00010849023,0.0003305083,0.0006481118,0.00026857248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917857,0.0066194814,0.0003281548,0.00021603129,0.00072331517,0.00032720852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034801334,0.00072261045,0.00062012556,0.0009352307,0.0019003592,0.0062905103,0.00086486776,0.003189853,0.026867438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0137150865,0.00032407048,0.00085599243,0.0008799101,0.0056935004,0.006534824,0.0016552687,0.007749037,0.0069810064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037890295,0.000066599314,0.00021366809,0.00019111755,0.000014744868,0.00007172386,0.0007646627,0.00062617543,0.00028001494,0.8201973,0.15040344,0.027132658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022337625,0.000040511524,0.0005589455,0.00045418052,0.000015997388,0.00010842377,0.0006203458,0.0010114205,0.00030620897,0.6335931,0.3632431,0.000025458456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026436676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018832585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026867438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006270256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002067978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089880586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200503215","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/kt5ya","title":"Conjectures on Science and Rationality: Commentary on Fiedler, Salmen, &amp;amp; Prager (2022)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Mathematical economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Ecological rationality; Laplace transform; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2083340373998797,"score_gpt":0.44396456939372336,"score_spread":0.23563053199384365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200503215","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009353943,0.012216671,0.00039185464,0.96989876,0.015685162,0.0000025312552,0.000064302316,0.000014103887,0.0016330797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0152547,0.010013368,0.0015379665,0.8722038,0.09540485,0.000053688495,0.00006511139,0.00010382607,0.005362592],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896275,0.003691401,0.0007216,0.0017632367,0.0038307353,0.00036558256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9420549,0.04618081,0.001497403,0.0011634937,0.008222493,0.0008808568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013814523,0.0012621387,0.0018078147,0.0021225016,0.0035763548,0.005748137,0.0070041865,0.033613488,0.0046712663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060506064,0.00066128856,0.0013443346,0.0021974172,0.02356631,0.012413469,0.0032341764,0.03804832,0.004482761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041595827,0.000007662988,0.000030823874,0.00012423124,0.0000129971595,0.00008191849,0.00041221778,0.00014292562,0.00004556812,0.11171307,0.88162416,0.005762853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006935722,0.000015944206,0.00026263559,0.0006432739,0.000019748099,0.00019706435,0.00033428654,0.0005161375,0.00023063835,0.3958391,0.60179937,0.000072446375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011186868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011080825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033613488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007947195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048576365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07305908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200611774","doi":"10.1177/00222437211068025","title":"Understanding and Neutralizing the Expense Prediction Bias: The Role of Accessibility, Typicality, and Skewness","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Booth School of Business, University of Chicago","keywords":"Skewness; Skew; Econometrics; Mode (computer interface); Economics; Advertising; Actuarial science; Marketing; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.6610217989920589,"score_gpt":0.5100268606449933,"score_spread":0.15099493834706568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200611774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622297,0.0011947439,0.021322316,0.0029490578,0.000059542213,0.00009209124,0.00006151295,0.000052953146,0.012038025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676776,0.00013958821,0.0026231578,0.00025448352,0.00001811992,0.000022891898,0.000017459271,0.0000051779,0.0001513981],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99174255,0.005601523,0.0004479498,0.00063375814,0.0013252015,0.0002490089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8263983,0.14294188,0.017195728,0.009355611,0.0032051203,0.0009034109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017866978,0.00033700408,0.00048718075,0.0008969252,0.0005269111,0.002365396,0.00081446016,0.0014339732,0.0026802118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10720226,0.0003201484,0.0006598661,0.00065079855,0.0038705268,0.0070294,0.0023095666,0.001423561,0.00015266014],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037284996,0.0013501318,0.5804395,0.0010922183,0.0007508941,0.00035081507,0.017628836,0.005523274,0.0050665922,0.07255628,0.0017888488,0.30972406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078455254,0.0033506306,0.53542477,0.001501665,0.0020290844,0.0011423884,0.017529104,0.043276288,0.016519092,0.36212957,0.016001446,0.00031138686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015111925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017541626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017866978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008179453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012644654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09449077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205204427","doi":"10.18438/eblip30044","title":"Announcing and Advocating: The Missing Step in the EBLIP Model","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Operations research; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10540163403748827,"score_gpt":0.3691787815054047,"score_spread":0.2637771474679164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205204427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033411827,0.002384669,0.30528575,0.2424912,0.0010110982,0.00049593975,0.0009855821,0.00028109777,0.41365287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84899586,0.002559226,0.07544353,0.025431087,0.0014696601,0.0009235562,0.00020420921,0.00019219902,0.04478066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98447603,0.009972287,0.00046274072,0.0012937118,0.0023799392,0.001415292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9275582,0.05989865,0.002325852,0.004101631,0.0033072785,0.0028084253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019755524,0.001261938,0.002375972,0.0023968427,0.0037177678,0.012309306,0.00395592,0.015924038,0.045078587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08175434,0.0009352873,0.0011898063,0.0024906797,0.019424623,0.02621026,0.006280494,0.012435105,0.0048031495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001113132,0.00008934114,0.0006132804,0.00012484609,0.00002828344,0.00012484321,0.0003985918,0.0030959167,0.00006631113,0.9773552,0.004711035,0.013280935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006833014,0.00002459845,0.00013791211,0.00008791956,0.000025182553,0.000072290524,0.00022111535,0.00804231,0.00006465451,0.9858543,0.0053836047,0.000017702045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006799644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057591074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045078587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036756685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007425086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15080285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205741254","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/kpy8a","title":"Information about task progress modulates cognitive demand avoidance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Army Research Office; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Task (project management); Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Action (physics); Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.07592392844458976,"score_gpt":0.38732076921248093,"score_spread":0.3113968407678912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205741254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980332,0.000031144158,0.00043583353,0.000050995543,0.000009958058,0.000010192253,0.00004209659,0.000009897012,0.0013766538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975605,0.00007095714,0.0009997551,0.00007382837,0.000010625848,0.000033094286,0.00009316623,0.000019552144,0.001138491],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995328,0.00014064612,0.00003652035,0.00014381236,0.00009017039,0.000056119625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969861,0.0011796958,0.0008367575,0.0004809823,0.0001369686,0.00037963563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096234464,0.00042277158,0.00037680147,0.0002586845,0.00020629339,0.0011725834,0.00022056304,0.0004967694,0.0035358258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005838712,0.000330484,0.00015916668,0.00016096322,0.00042614512,0.00042958648,0.00063516584,0.0009716609,0.0002488602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0239398,0.012881857,0.19681041,0.0006752439,0.0006041981,0.0004482583,0.0044021313,0.0049772244,0.6654448,0.004460632,0.0022507892,0.08310453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005925764,0.0054115243,0.9545794,0.00005731975,0.00031336752,0.00013996109,0.0005663381,0.009258008,0.021080146,0.005374101,0.0025333038,0.00009393596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007597625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086471415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035358258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023453508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019137126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011828542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206031678","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3982168","title":"A Characterization of Consideration Functions: When Asymmetric Revealed Preferences Suffice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Characterization (materials science); Mathematical economics; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Physics","score_opus":0.0728323054005499,"score_gpt":0.33617794020684805,"score_spread":0.26334563480629813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206031678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5789601,0.0005573491,0.38384184,0.0029489393,0.000095953066,0.0002791475,0.0010739682,0.00029659743,0.031946123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97775465,0.00020205652,0.018993482,0.00019249758,0.0001042668,0.00018858613,0.00041958096,0.000087825145,0.002056892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936659,0.0028138882,0.00046510366,0.0010646522,0.0006521328,0.0013384508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9238721,0.055587124,0.005963817,0.007372405,0.003794377,0.0034102644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010025418,0.0011579423,0.0019554016,0.002578807,0.0013623157,0.005495705,0.0019145418,0.003372041,0.008279244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.101926945,0.0008611283,0.0019339814,0.0025189754,0.003250595,0.014672959,0.0026065488,0.003854078,0.0008898727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014393881,0.00037238735,0.020830626,0.00042685078,0.00020463363,0.0008639126,0.0015195808,0.015212223,0.004545012,0.88709235,0.004019862,0.063473225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000838606,0.00017516162,0.005017941,0.00009789704,0.000066221626,0.0006339791,0.00053880544,0.11962661,0.0022206283,0.8698364,0.0016371335,0.00006540994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010376925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005841901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010025418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015028279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014754386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05302006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206203128","doi":"10.1007/s00355-020-01285-9","title":"Choice resolutions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Università di Catania","keywords":"Rationalizability; Preorder; Resolution (logic); Independence (probability theory); Path (computing); Order (exchange); Simple (philosophy); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Discrete mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2240353870216814,"score_gpt":0.4185354270676562,"score_spread":0.19450004004597476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206203128","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016750652,0.00034060882,0.9216867,0.001330818,0.00016108704,0.0004095062,0.00032754813,0.00065485167,0.058338303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30086064,0.0003762148,0.6719425,0.0005110944,0.00015329148,0.0006912278,0.0007753635,0.00042804983,0.024261644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884044,0.0053451816,0.00079111184,0.0019606599,0.002751932,0.00074666354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98559904,0.0063513485,0.0008152777,0.004434269,0.0020922942,0.0007077627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007922017,0.0009735043,0.0008436397,0.0025315965,0.002309305,0.0044687153,0.0023200181,0.0014904261,0.019525811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019735754,0.00084664277,0.0029608926,0.0017090794,0.006413164,0.008904648,0.0063777263,0.004606519,0.0030221285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028357448,0.000034868583,0.000252287,0.000035831454,0.000023782502,0.00007883961,0.0006879058,0.0021138985,0.0006433441,0.981716,0.001226144,0.013158676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022401779,0.0000256281,0.000164568,0.000053899104,0.000019776193,0.00008383679,0.00033037472,0.015812796,0.002226453,0.940132,0.041101463,0.00002670768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015758077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013525635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019525811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018581323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017621131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06532031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206454672","doi":"10.3390/g13010013","title":"Random Rank-Dependent Expected Utility","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Rank (graph theory); Expected utility hypothesis; Characterization (materials science); Statistical hypothesis testing; Expected value; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Combinatorics; Physics","score_opus":0.1298978114648991,"score_gpt":0.3834981293634477,"score_spread":0.2536003178985486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206454672","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05717592,0.00062650756,0.93060714,0.0019838004,0.00010011491,0.0003135123,0.0014474124,0.0003441701,0.0074014636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8845136,0.0007696815,0.10375971,0.0011496105,0.00035263144,0.0012745287,0.0018548279,0.00023836333,0.006087036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9736699,0.016990788,0.0010376464,0.0038310662,0.002888281,0.0015822535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7703943,0.19078791,0.01101322,0.020319166,0.0045967386,0.0028886036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030335562,0.0017308309,0.0034838263,0.002437165,0.00092657685,0.0050766324,0.0050647845,0.0027039626,0.010001061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.166872,0.00085529377,0.0020239884,0.0025632398,0.0062675406,0.012206649,0.0037775196,0.0060737845,0.0012328975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037598348,0.00019406396,0.0063088993,0.00030668316,0.0002232287,0.00031103505,0.0002772459,0.11489224,0.000864063,0.84655863,0.004285,0.025402896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006932475,0.0001812276,0.0018355852,0.00008604014,0.000033973,0.00020891003,0.000068428606,0.30195245,0.00059630536,0.693364,0.0015346429,0.00006915189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011230251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088572217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030335562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003534608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020408905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16043168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206516048","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/ynbmr","title":"Push Outcomes Bias Perceptions of Scratch Card Games","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scratch; Lottery; Feeling; Psychology; Outcome (game theory); Perception; Advertising; Social psychology; Computer science; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.28198388051563716,"score_gpt":0.4537372735496796,"score_spread":0.1717533930340424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206516048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99835324,0.000053123964,0.00025083637,0.000025613333,0.0000071133663,0.000019559417,0.000016118654,0.0000029222222,0.0012715794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993993,0.000055809687,0.00016291553,0.00004363308,0.0000053183,0.000020016138,0.000024758481,0.0000029992625,0.000285257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837214,0.00065253134,0.00013522356,0.00018397892,0.00050004316,0.00015604263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928732,0.0037983009,0.0019001685,0.00038216036,0.0004868062,0.0005594285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023655738,0.0003627737,0.00029931456,0.0005477619,0.00040778297,0.0019281078,0.00020663871,0.00060905906,0.00352127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015915763,0.00025958655,0.0003387793,0.00024703614,0.0011367205,0.00084745674,0.0016144771,0.00079910405,0.00028048575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030448996,0.0017587527,0.866456,0.0006583277,0.0003165938,0.0006921781,0.062355705,0.0005170643,0.020406138,0.0020930234,0.0006235246,0.041077793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087872715,0.0013363532,0.9640813,0.00013431383,0.000117490956,0.0004085403,0.02737552,0.0009294331,0.0018836419,0.0016822848,0.0018815404,0.00008169325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012266664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020201644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00352127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028245978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024690636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0125104785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206701330","doi":"10.2196/preprints.32709","title":"Understanding Decision Making in the Adoption of Digital Health Technology: The Role of Behavioural Economics’ Prospect Theory (Preprint)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prospect theory; Behavioral economics; Preprint; Irrational number; Nudge theory; Positive economics; Behavioural economics; Health technology; Field (mathematics); Behavioural sciences; Management science; Economics; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Health care; Social science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.23693334573396055,"score_gpt":0.3886242971751964,"score_spread":0.15169095144123587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206701330","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18284227,0.019535935,0.37176794,0.1395971,0.0020970819,0.000246766,0.00061149657,0.00022214289,0.28307927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93107367,0.014538981,0.037732106,0.002743519,0.00095241365,0.0001509959,0.00023436826,0.00005816782,0.01251578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971125,0.002103639,0.00007409909,0.00018300669,0.00038768872,0.00013907447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839066,0.013855529,0.0009802397,0.00029576974,0.0006167016,0.00034515365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052218097,0.00050787564,0.0006643286,0.0011330129,0.00064777443,0.0056846915,0.000645389,0.0027857518,0.0067159873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015113577,0.0002758374,0.00080080586,0.0013083708,0.0039079776,0.0055475384,0.0012774573,0.0028441253,0.00069699745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035395675,0.00011136633,0.0014215806,0.00017240911,0.000048330392,0.00009435427,0.0007567312,0.007407308,0.00017703425,0.96411175,0.004800242,0.0208635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010167599,0.000023055534,0.0013245154,0.00009985818,0.000011083371,0.00004097042,0.00037307604,0.012812853,0.00009033168,0.9780096,0.0071870573,0.000017407332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019697093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090097747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067159873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018475121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014978867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027615905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206918081","doi":"10.3917/cerpsy.098.0032","title":"L’effet de cadrage","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cerveau & Psycho","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.1562351327664002,"score_gpt":0.4735114989065195,"score_spread":0.31727636614011934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206918081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48864016,0.0145159615,0.008398213,0.09833994,0.0032846972,0.00013966279,0.0009939546,0.00035071067,0.38533676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566864,0.0017628409,0.0015010127,0.0066682287,0.0005014069,0.00004562891,0.00014054345,0.00004752898,0.032646332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620557,0.0022604205,0.00008768588,0.00032615697,0.0006657861,0.00045449103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831303,0.013211678,0.00092209026,0.001034608,0.00090103375,0.0008003084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003873946,0.0004313298,0.00056938914,0.00065217324,0.0010217611,0.0034560107,0.00072588853,0.004880857,0.04313754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028088352,0.00021193264,0.0007429513,0.00043845564,0.001982851,0.0018703465,0.00089259853,0.0025991485,0.0031283188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01241263,0.0038603153,0.023218904,0.0011807879,0.00095165416,0.0011166912,0.0018809144,0.014540348,0.0055512968,0.5578129,0.09658582,0.28088772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004039134,0.0042625153,0.06510206,0.0009786559,0.0007801651,0.0019426867,0.0044426615,0.023837198,0.007657199,0.37789735,0.5088027,0.00025770592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008553978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054775467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04313754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021101828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014045968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14430946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210369397","doi":"10.1109/cdc45484.2021.9683260","title":"Policy-Dependent and Policy-Independent Static Reduction of Stochastic Dynamic Teams and Games and Fragility of Equivalence Properties","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2021 60th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bijection; Convexity; Reduction (mathematics); Equivalence (formal languages); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Stochastic control; Control (management); Optimal control; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Economics; Discrete mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06531591309574436,"score_gpt":0.3620595027644107,"score_spread":0.2967435896686663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210369397","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11280378,0.00018073287,0.8517968,0.0013614184,0.00006159908,0.00021084903,0.0002795508,0.00022013053,0.033085153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8974532,0.00025946237,0.09235011,0.00031270238,0.00010213698,0.0006286395,0.00047538558,0.00013409377,0.008284295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936324,0.0020953107,0.00036502563,0.0015225713,0.0015215133,0.0008631777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880151,0.0073955124,0.0013549372,0.0014862785,0.0010838639,0.00066426763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043454403,0.000846358,0.0011290616,0.0016096912,0.0021308945,0.0022985886,0.002116361,0.0016747429,0.008995914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01947633,0.00060434954,0.0024780603,0.0011778027,0.004313029,0.0059426576,0.0048565324,0.004147512,0.00048776178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001711842,0.00004875877,0.00030636546,0.000026925483,0.000013032686,0.000042287484,0.00022245917,0.013097853,0.00032122165,0.97932625,0.00038894094,0.0061887465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000126511,0.000036820682,0.00023605532,0.000013987662,0.000008229183,0.000032040465,0.0000907496,0.06417584,0.00038379888,0.93403786,0.00095783744,0.000014044431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025386673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013371162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008995914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028013187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018691587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030094326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210413809","doi":"10.1080/01462679.2022.2030840","title":"Situating the Problematics of Judgment-Based Deselection: A Heuristics and Biases Approach","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Collection Management","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Status quo bias; Endowment effect; Context (archaeology); Endowment; Status quo; Loss aversion; Prospect theory; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Management science; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.19657083705203834,"score_gpt":0.3686091870057728,"score_spread":0.17203834995373443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210413809","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22030309,0.003383365,0.6868875,0.013170842,0.00030171467,0.00023365965,0.00006922086,0.0000901163,0.075560525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9170207,0.0009292127,0.07991718,0.00055090326,0.000113390364,0.000112946786,0.000024972682,0.00003044262,0.0013003346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986891,0.008435434,0.0004901658,0.0009635911,0.00239957,0.00082029373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96299005,0.028134732,0.003723848,0.0024679606,0.0019684085,0.0007151141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016717529,0.00060212536,0.00066548696,0.0036271168,0.0018749365,0.0064530685,0.0015837679,0.0014149966,0.0020403515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0410441,0.0004192958,0.0009160863,0.0019507832,0.012415335,0.007702084,0.0032699087,0.0027670406,0.00017433242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007860684,0.00005424878,0.0037723097,0.00019272907,0.000085708925,0.00018017291,0.005587989,0.007841654,0.00061639195,0.94047076,0.00062358764,0.04049576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016648553,0.000034526653,0.0016615056,0.000102392216,0.000025779662,0.00010042546,0.0020200987,0.009040405,0.0007786161,0.9800749,0.006106092,0.000038439615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018045659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018054448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016717529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034753315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026560754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08841175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210605159","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2021.794014","title":"Changes in Loss Sensitivity During Treatment in Concurrent Disorders Inpatients: A Computational Model Approach to Assessing Risky Decision-Making","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Provincial Health Services Authority; BC Mental Health & Substance Use Services; University of British Columbia","funders":"Provincial Health Services Authority","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Psychology; Mental health; Clinical psychology; Psychiatry; Medicine","score_opus":0.04142798101269025,"score_gpt":0.3602536963875951,"score_spread":0.31882571537490484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210605159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99357224,0.000027688819,0.0057413457,0.000104815095,0.0000021501348,0.000030790114,0.000094957504,0.000028592804,0.00039753114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99694663,0.000023867278,0.002858864,0.000013133809,0.000001586779,0.0000291932,0.00007869966,0.0000027222097,0.00004532666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955004,0.00025299116,0.000030475361,0.00006207269,0.000057055375,0.000047319518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577904,0.0031555963,0.0005599005,0.00022572697,0.00012215067,0.00015759424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014133771,0.0004916499,0.0004703713,0.00096008397,0.00026674708,0.0014838397,0.00059468,0.00044549606,0.0007473261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008664105,0.00029422634,0.0006481162,0.0005223966,0.00064886163,0.00062900304,0.0008773658,0.0006700915,0.0000661303],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015351266,0.00090376864,0.6823199,0.00009217164,0.00048812747,0.00022140285,0.0011526287,0.27779472,0.002185199,0.0028626395,0.0004010617,0.030043187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039716928,0.0003656577,0.102282286,0.000017360177,0.00006602223,0.00013955968,0.00033920686,0.89127016,0.0005622773,0.004750621,0.00014209539,0.000025028092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010921807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01104872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010921807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016334543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001025953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021716475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210901269","doi":"10.1037/xge0001179","title":"Logical intuition is not really about logic.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Macquarie University","keywords":"Intuition; Logical consequence; Indeterminate; Logical conjunction; Psychology; Logical form; Logical reasoning; Probabilistic logic; Epistemology; Inference; Modus ponens; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive science; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.248374088983785,"score_gpt":0.5042549891909857,"score_spread":0.25588090020720067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210901269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12545295,0.010218981,0.08745454,0.09781305,0.0029312123,0.00011390295,0.0017637722,0.00091540307,0.6733362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454718,0.0023501155,0.02533716,0.009647541,0.0005018631,0.00011497389,0.00069212995,0.00015953016,0.01572479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814,0.0008918332,0.00013702674,0.00033034323,0.00041135532,0.000089439396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945498,0.0036608588,0.00063079415,0.0006300045,0.0003641483,0.00016452865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022561743,0.0002099994,0.0002876376,0.00039151235,0.00058411766,0.0045476155,0.0005487033,0.0014560346,0.024420885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015562417,0.00021357289,0.00043349306,0.000522611,0.0057752174,0.0112530785,0.0011359195,0.002855961,0.0036625043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022743143,0.00004792901,0.0029616284,0.0005882786,0.00005359375,0.000120557655,0.003090451,0.00025201536,0.0011853842,0.92158395,0.025402531,0.044486284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004440169,0.000049385562,0.003404617,0.00020590154,0.000027019383,0.0004957041,0.0014983064,0.00074484147,0.0006201894,0.90579987,0.08708704,0.000022682772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035674372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046133596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024420885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007538918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052140065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08169603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211127273","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/wtupm","title":"Logical Intuition Is Not Really About Logic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Macquarie University","keywords":"Intuition; Logical consequence; Logical conjunction; Logical analysis; Indeterminate; Non-classical logic; Modus ponens; Logical form; Logical reasoning; Probabilistic logic; Psychology; Inference; Epistemology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3269425148933434,"score_gpt":0.4567912874123577,"score_spread":0.12984877251901428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211127273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13036552,0.020796552,0.33716327,0.14497648,0.0033486164,0.00013391368,0.00074161694,0.0019478169,0.36052632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9296085,0.0038242156,0.0405016,0.016284,0.0012673642,0.000120905,0.00033883986,0.0004108064,0.007643805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907631,0.004300892,0.00053760124,0.0015262142,0.0024226678,0.0004495555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974161,0.018388351,0.0019269907,0.003421685,0.0014724688,0.0006293144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009068264,0.0005640752,0.0009582448,0.0010424585,0.0011803168,0.008366496,0.0017221975,0.0030276552,0.0081189005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03631377,0.00065799535,0.000979437,0.00076240464,0.022405772,0.025371334,0.0032788399,0.0071028043,0.001743294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019083451,0.00006506795,0.0022754567,0.0009962862,0.00016787832,0.00012534954,0.004366243,0.0010047113,0.0016202489,0.9455946,0.0089795105,0.034613807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003614498,0.00005170226,0.0013132733,0.0001718808,0.00003222659,0.0002478527,0.00058921357,0.0011138025,0.00058726163,0.95704603,0.03876952,0.000041146643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008314109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057737203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009068264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019820046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014620725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047958136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211165067","doi":"10.1177/1745691612454303","title":"Hindsight Bias","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":445,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Hindsight bias; Overconfidence effect; Psychology; Debiasing; Cognitive bias; Recall; Cognitive psychology; Intervention (counseling); Sensemaking; Meaning (existential); Neglect; Social psychology; Philosophy of science; Cognition; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.39829618382886645,"score_gpt":0.5334642844091555,"score_spread":0.13516810058028905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211165067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16734043,0.011768513,0.32830948,0.029310158,0.0044822115,0.0014563237,0.0023260126,0.0037351495,0.45127162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90805733,0.003124802,0.032194324,0.020588852,0.0015884452,0.0006056954,0.000740024,0.000579625,0.032520927],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98044443,0.0071930317,0.0019767769,0.0037919185,0.005424844,0.0011689164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9117152,0.04023111,0.018744716,0.0134040015,0.013182513,0.0027224224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012805839,0.0011031269,0.0009477875,0.0013827916,0.0014953079,0.0032408596,0.0016190544,0.0026501492,0.031596493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10200191,0.00041714136,0.0007839361,0.0008299897,0.0049041975,0.0032011883,0.003043976,0.0032550246,0.0061089206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029213273,0.000520808,0.0980838,0.0027143657,0.00071333814,0.0043054884,0.013060442,0.0026994036,0.02110241,0.24769285,0.12996012,0.47622576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005469823,0.0010082574,0.082644716,0.0027891467,0.0005992028,0.02181458,0.0051990557,0.0071978127,0.01814132,0.4028543,0.45677057,0.00043398634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025929653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025049616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031596493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019400193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018262488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10570079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214526237","doi":"10.55365/1923.x2020.18.03","title":"Cross-Cultural Differences in the Perception of Portfolio Risk","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics and Finance","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio; Risk perception; Perception; Asset allocation; Perspective (graphical); Asset (computer security); Cross-cultural; Investment (military); Actuarial science; Economics; Financial economics; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.1461150940702534,"score_gpt":0.39301324695927325,"score_spread":0.24689815288901987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214526237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99821174,0.00008550639,0.00016503714,0.000029837847,0.00000458433,0.0000038744306,0.000015795371,6.857049e-7,0.0014827676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994141,0.00010441514,0.00011722548,0.00003750248,0.0000022706163,0.000004988056,0.000021461332,0.0000013679962,0.00029666635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925166,0.00031955558,0.000058536603,0.00009651201,0.00018661389,0.000087084976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970847,0.0012412374,0.0006957337,0.00026289024,0.00037727455,0.00033821756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014354105,0.00019919661,0.00016711584,0.00046995835,0.0003349319,0.0012685589,0.00012069579,0.00023557812,0.0022138497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005012072,0.00012994853,0.00020916549,0.0003533574,0.00072350795,0.00045046303,0.0006048247,0.00043446192,0.00020850044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069485814,0.0006400899,0.86350954,0.00015700237,0.00032880044,0.00051749306,0.07898074,0.00032688622,0.01828283,0.00207896,0.00045724536,0.03402559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016386071,0.00031594877,0.9659246,0.000047128942,0.00007034458,0.00030431588,0.02862334,0.0003933726,0.0017986929,0.0011172934,0.0013492834,0.000039344293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034858054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003938635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034858054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024182186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019014753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007591307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214741076","doi":"10.1177/01461672221077791","title":"Anxiety, Cognitive Availability, and the Talisman Effect of Insurance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Anxiety; Cognition; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.07057242817275633,"score_gpt":0.4006610758127681,"score_spread":0.3300886476400118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214741076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99679726,0.00009887617,0.00019756054,0.00024315152,0.0000058521127,0.000006231788,0.000021270023,0.0000049288283,0.0026249096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99964845,0.00003360373,0.00008695139,0.00006503439,0.00000912378,0.0000035329615,0.00001379189,0.0000011833375,0.00013833154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933594,0.00031554524,0.000027369293,0.000071611365,0.0001492163,0.000100245896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871585,0.0070490954,0.0033753067,0.0006770145,0.00020294193,0.0015372407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011403832,0.00021765397,0.00019322864,0.0006495586,0.00045146467,0.00095536915,0.00025017507,0.0005405915,0.0048027667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009746767,0.0001524466,0.00032196898,0.0002728465,0.0012736862,0.00045532652,0.0007495361,0.0013047365,0.00014588218],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024420433,0.0039023913,0.9470435,0.00010094066,0.0005070018,0.00046079053,0.00223367,0.00095287035,0.0066678147,0.005465746,0.00055748376,0.029665835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005136174,0.00034004808,0.99499387,0.000008558601,0.00007158876,0.00013153696,0.00056819717,0.00093492714,0.00022848316,0.0024389639,0.00021865751,0.000013894669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017050107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020440377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048027667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026988593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023075851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01606685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220685513","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105107","title":"Information about task progress modulates cognitive demand avoidance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Psychology; Task (project management); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Action (physics); Computer science; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.06068563833822345,"score_gpt":0.3580696607402074,"score_spread":0.29738402240198397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220685513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948773,0.000087259024,0.0012410545,0.00016267096,0.00005684224,0.000020978585,0.00014588963,0.000026790698,0.0033813338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966054,0.00012415946,0.0010420057,0.000082472136,0.000042003063,0.00003139087,0.00022539221,0.00006636904,0.0017807968],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992305,0.0001736767,0.00006449522,0.00020957363,0.00021411102,0.00010769916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892826,0.0065622716,0.001991582,0.0011020692,0.00037692743,0.0006844947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001216582,0.00053053733,0.0006426708,0.00037874654,0.00027329064,0.0023394623,0.0005100318,0.0009342551,0.0056495327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018748201,0.000546584,0.00026969454,0.0003220807,0.0005186373,0.0012722943,0.0009133745,0.0016108396,0.00058150745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.060930368,0.008866026,0.15196982,0.0011439768,0.0009095154,0.00074447546,0.0044242977,0.015038885,0.62316376,0.009674666,0.003692971,0.119441286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012014292,0.003922884,0.90180796,0.00015414486,0.0006633464,0.00024330891,0.00047577886,0.035294075,0.03102531,0.022241537,0.0028035028,0.00016670674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012815068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010145182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056495327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037970024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055506395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01889956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220750995","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2280","title":"Information‐seeking when information doesn't matter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Portfolio; Certainty; Action (physics); Psychology; Instrumental variable; Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Finance; Econometrics","score_opus":0.06879234510743981,"score_gpt":0.3845880225931744,"score_spread":0.31579567748573456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220750995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98557127,0.00025563352,0.0033978266,0.0005123985,0.000041652027,0.00006398961,0.000076288925,0.000044891127,0.010035942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99750805,0.00009994466,0.0013016483,0.00022395713,0.000017859309,0.000029631705,0.00004444362,0.000013541552,0.00076088327],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753773,0.00092244433,0.00028744354,0.0004034902,0.0006305151,0.00021841857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94052655,0.044574767,0.00636755,0.00611686,0.0009432876,0.0014709908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003901675,0.00026314348,0.0005889696,0.0005460706,0.0002866318,0.0015169999,0.00038355662,0.001227201,0.007824532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037143543,0.00028486998,0.00034531314,0.0002759476,0.0008303769,0.0019352942,0.0010724524,0.0015436743,0.00054005894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023776483,0.009757956,0.35405988,0.003709726,0.0012998701,0.0010804122,0.007769352,0.008145524,0.25318745,0.04900383,0.0044639423,0.28374565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014583893,0.015823837,0.7373574,0.0005734819,0.0014843799,0.0016119047,0.0034031267,0.04332209,0.07111896,0.110843845,0.012726899,0.00027570178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034619536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035948193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007824532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033435572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029137646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026175678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220956819","doi":"10.1098/rsos.211977","title":"Trivially informative semantic context inflates people's confidence they can perform a highly complex skill","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Royal Society Open Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Overconfidence effect; Context (archaeology); Feeling; Metacognition; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Fluency; Persuasion; Metamemory; Computer science; Cognition; Mathematics education; History","score_opus":0.08228390346554458,"score_gpt":0.37672688774804086,"score_spread":0.29444298428249627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220956819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99627626,0.000059424925,0.0006604898,0.00006776825,0.0000056653466,0.000007335,0.000019968817,0.000009542243,0.0028936123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924767,0.00004081722,0.0003969703,0.00005819927,0.0000064195674,0.0000071766754,0.0000382608,0.00000429829,0.00020017193],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983328,0.0006494351,0.00013885534,0.00025197415,0.00047637915,0.00015046881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97642016,0.015846875,0.0037422169,0.0020386653,0.0009239231,0.0010281111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027791415,0.00036795437,0.00031759538,0.0005674912,0.0004939926,0.0018141053,0.00033747876,0.0010716986,0.004128526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027136236,0.00033906638,0.00038704145,0.00023822646,0.0013430018,0.0016744855,0.0014242328,0.001144269,0.0002831125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010152563,0.0025259824,0.72058475,0.0007593472,0.0009159799,0.001830691,0.025670448,0.008451224,0.07884919,0.009552808,0.00210087,0.13860615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032285828,0.0037941476,0.934394,0.0001259497,0.00042151308,0.0008798972,0.007859581,0.012623994,0.01173274,0.022759434,0.0048646047,0.00022140917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015476171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013414117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004128526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003943316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017604965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014697671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221054841","doi":"10.1111/caje.12572","title":"Present bias and externalities: Can government intervention raise welfare?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Externality; Economics; Economic interventionism; Welfare; Intervention (counseling); Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Public economics; Microeconomics; Market failure; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.337604643441556,"score_gpt":0.2732559769974578,"score_spread":0.0643486664440982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221054841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7414385,0.0040094224,0.10210302,0.0350205,0.00029062902,0.00015071029,0.00021341708,0.00010003373,0.11667376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961916,0.0004721514,0.001305096,0.00044636664,0.000050256014,0.000017355513,0.000007757957,0.0000058236005,0.0015035244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984993,0.00077841757,0.00005308448,0.00014817923,0.00019929085,0.00032177274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921211,0.0047608586,0.0017378397,0.0005925063,0.00045609148,0.000331663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029683784,0.0002847831,0.00064847554,0.0003273096,0.00040913784,0.0023721592,0.00045729193,0.0018068375,0.004495161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010897819,0.00020786388,0.00049896276,0.00028980308,0.0033378822,0.0024634383,0.0015206033,0.0014515808,0.00017523153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006142324,0.0004077454,0.013835831,0.00040072296,0.00021780384,0.00050889706,0.0005247784,0.031336535,0.0046832375,0.90731245,0.0023270794,0.037830684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010993615,0.00022543668,0.008092257,0.0001702851,0.00013106312,0.00018245142,0.00052511116,0.027527139,0.0022330869,0.955255,0.005519364,0.00002879492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012738925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012917664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004495161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023080288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014131624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016745985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225545418","doi":"10.1007/s10899-021-10103-5","title":"Using Icon Arrays to Communicate Gambling Information Reduces the Appeal of Scratch Card Games","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Gambling Studies","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Icon; Appeal; Salience (neuroscience); Psychology; Scratch; Perception; Feeling; Social psychology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Advertising; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.409108575537668,"score_gpt":0.496902943627795,"score_spread":0.08779436809012703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225545418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97664684,0.00014708986,0.009015414,0.00047172967,0.00022582803,0.00006255935,0.00005730551,0.0003952921,0.01297792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98833245,0.00010095935,0.0054484783,0.000419888,0.000062536965,0.00007418082,0.000088163426,0.000113916794,0.0053594313],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990951,0.00041113643,0.000048878468,0.00013595595,0.00018575515,0.00012322546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99033934,0.0073589194,0.0006946996,0.00061512174,0.00037442186,0.0006174291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080574607,0.0006367635,0.00047915152,0.00051340635,0.00023981465,0.0013488027,0.00067880703,0.0016085207,0.022398857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017601,0.00035026224,0.00020356008,0.00027593103,0.0004539395,0.0012077683,0.00091365166,0.0009816553,0.002535894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022781232,0.019034855,0.02335221,0.0008723464,0.00020964014,0.00059611927,0.00137099,0.005316197,0.5432055,0.010558435,0.008827009,0.36387545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041526733,0.04843922,0.25285456,0.0007762485,0.0016986248,0.0035580774,0.0039849775,0.2264862,0.36795425,0.05326993,0.03627136,0.00055395544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005371271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005064481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022398857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020878433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029071298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07493162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225620916","doi":"10.1007/s10614-022-10252-8","title":"The Slicing Method: Determining Insensitivity Regions of Probability Weighting Functions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"CHIST-ERA; Xunta de Galicia; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs; Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación","keywords":"Weighting; Heuristic; Rule of thumb; Computer science; Subadditivity; Slicing; Mathematical optimization; Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.17850966088803258,"score_gpt":0.3926388063783125,"score_spread":0.21412914549027992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225620916","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009853823,0.00015116805,0.98862565,0.00003391827,0.000007659944,0.000025226602,0.00006838636,0.00026186462,0.0009723792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27855724,0.0004135453,0.71849704,0.00009961016,0.000037287537,0.00018283165,0.00044604446,0.00062645914,0.0011398734],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899405,0.0005062807,0.000046830963,0.0001336679,0.00022715396,0.00009206077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835902,0.013659358,0.0005497741,0.000913131,0.00094588625,0.00034167757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004864328,0.0013033355,0.0013374583,0.0026979872,0.0005855411,0.0015173922,0.0014721868,0.00089098286,0.0042860424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027628979,0.0011258535,0.0013799143,0.0013263653,0.0011594732,0.0025608784,0.0016858508,0.0017068158,0.00047572324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045766507,0.00012346702,0.0031441888,0.00043897144,0.00024230979,0.00026181803,0.00044448872,0.5675729,0.011539882,0.18358235,0.0048758765,0.22731614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015964655,0.000023876291,0.00040505992,0.00002861957,0.000028009572,0.000045931378,0.000017300787,0.93701637,0.0026407433,0.059098493,0.0006624563,0.00001714712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004690002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031151935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004864328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008352817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00178659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025725365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225620988","doi":"10.1007/s10899-022-10125-7","title":"Push Outcomes Bias Perceptions of Scratch Card Games","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Gambling Studies","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scratch; Lottery; Psychology; Feeling; Social psychology; Outcome (game theory); Perception; Odds; Propensity score matching; Advertising; Computer science; Medicine; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.37481589475820437,"score_gpt":0.5004427257893715,"score_spread":0.12562683103116717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225620988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99685764,0.000041659718,0.00016267874,0.000120787365,0.000015554397,0.000010317523,0.000016381031,0.0000027911442,0.002772152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933165,0.00003975585,0.000111175796,0.00008769135,0.000012799153,0.000008524944,0.000023795039,0.0000050846884,0.00037950894],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986297,0.000589561,0.000105260355,0.00014830378,0.00035153737,0.00017565783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9758045,0.015679972,0.004531667,0.000942905,0.0010029761,0.002038029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029839068,0.00040860305,0.00033107627,0.0009909727,0.00041765603,0.0025734773,0.00032077866,0.0012700901,0.007863586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032228936,0.0003600142,0.00031867358,0.00042858763,0.0010921193,0.0010295421,0.0011380771,0.0014259721,0.0006888171],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005653779,0.0038540808,0.93346506,0.00017004368,0.00039288722,0.00023317969,0.010431574,0.000644135,0.00718466,0.0067729885,0.0009697686,0.030227741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026144332,0.0011488536,0.97581494,0.000087661036,0.00023836923,0.00018906346,0.009673313,0.0021636619,0.0011010913,0.007637624,0.0016281962,0.000055715587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019515054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025637469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007863586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037785794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003239982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026306272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226269705","doi":"10.22215/etd/2022-14861","title":"Anchoring in Time Estimation: The Effects of Explicit Anchoring on Prospective Time Estimates","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Anchoring; Replicate; Duration (music); Psychology; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03386917435593306,"score_gpt":0.3715369848990984,"score_spread":0.33766781054316536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226269705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90974295,0.0030719591,0.07245546,0.00080478773,0.00021453269,0.00020111914,0.00018028736,0.00017646675,0.01315231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759176,0.0005966201,0.022048363,0.00022480129,0.00007391973,0.00008997211,0.00011516138,0.00008292114,0.00085063814],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98106307,0.011156004,0.0014939692,0.0023758484,0.0035229356,0.00038818314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6095285,0.31083575,0.041425206,0.029947674,0.0067395046,0.0015233343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03398511,0.00064488454,0.0005947732,0.0007030007,0.0005031643,0.0024736724,0.00075510045,0.0010299506,0.0028391476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25607014,0.00095245126,0.00066395325,0.0008633721,0.0018824959,0.0035918239,0.0020873493,0.0023019407,0.00043202584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0093262205,0.0010454209,0.41956717,0.0016210289,0.0014176812,0.0004695918,0.012984768,0.0071297768,0.08681194,0.022317125,0.0021133295,0.43519598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027851076,0.0024292106,0.91016704,0.0005930269,0.00085742044,0.00076270336,0.001481833,0.01625597,0.033928696,0.027348947,0.005590585,0.00030616557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001545559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020803467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03398511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000768223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006751688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17973256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230091828","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/xugaz","title":"Risky-choice framing and rational decision-making","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Framing effect; Narrative; Epistemology; Empirical research; Prospect theory; Psychology; Management science; Positive economics; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11670704486615605,"score_gpt":0.4287130858463343,"score_spread":0.31200604098017826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230091828","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14046556,0.0068533826,0.5827779,0.01954098,0.00071361597,0.00015551802,0.00019729939,0.00013609602,0.24915959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9532716,0.002601096,0.03932337,0.0009721941,0.0004335445,0.00011000565,0.00009849807,0.000052237254,0.003137434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98932636,0.0073803794,0.00027742476,0.0008034567,0.0016893075,0.00052304514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733689,0.020739282,0.002336096,0.0019369621,0.0011608646,0.00045794164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011654877,0.0008662645,0.00073380425,0.0010676485,0.00087858894,0.004264993,0.0008201083,0.0019447485,0.006607789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02935087,0.0003844874,0.0008530233,0.0010330363,0.010519478,0.006435144,0.001978869,0.0028428002,0.0005841021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003062103,0.000019642666,0.00045206575,0.00006584362,0.000019061723,0.00004018722,0.00063007226,0.0018963035,0.00015719222,0.98921365,0.0004083612,0.0070669274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010336079,0.000010169662,0.00032566563,0.000036576675,0.000008022815,0.000021194892,0.00013163616,0.0024207474,0.00010959234,0.99420893,0.0027082998,0.000008798953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009045554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005212784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011654877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018846035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009542943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06163764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230460414","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/ja3p6","title":"Plans or Outcomes: How do we attribute intelligence to others?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Companhia Brasileira de Metalurgia e Mineração; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Attribution; Outcome (game theory); Planner; Task (project management); Psychology; Human intelligence; Quality (philosophy); Key (lock); Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Computer science; Applied psychology","score_opus":0.3732261221806011,"score_gpt":0.46503834505788605,"score_spread":0.09181222287728497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230460414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83882606,0.0011852016,0.12670343,0.002660763,0.00010706894,0.00022092447,0.0006159958,0.00037224786,0.029308302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910488,0.00020708461,0.007948402,0.00012485281,0.000027224327,0.00007277962,0.00014464227,0.000051933544,0.0003743083],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930548,0.0028855915,0.0003238912,0.0016579434,0.0016798778,0.0003979267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9530044,0.019183222,0.0135637745,0.008289855,0.0032779728,0.0026807375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00911862,0.0012824374,0.0007177298,0.003799668,0.00089589733,0.006574198,0.0011529877,0.0016590394,0.0022846523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09365009,0.00079256814,0.0009971333,0.0025718475,0.0077286093,0.011526167,0.0031168377,0.0019362469,0.0003665817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095795194,0.00033444352,0.6040568,0.00074439147,0.0016675049,0.00038176918,0.027807172,0.027774233,0.008788537,0.1255626,0.0021432373,0.19978146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010941287,0.0006799093,0.52214724,0.0003373665,0.0005292377,0.00039855574,0.008845489,0.05336027,0.004839791,0.39992136,0.008402371,0.0004289541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039410167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001503565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00911862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010588272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006803332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04822445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232149942","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_628","title":"Judgment and Decision-Making","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.12860954690620185,"score_gpt":0.3861719165396077,"score_spread":0.25756236963340584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232149942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023586552,0.019042633,0.044758666,0.0060913125,0.0010067609,0.000053332966,0.00009970963,0.00007081869,0.9265182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18908183,0.03163481,0.03834407,0.0039956067,0.0016982364,0.00026112387,0.000373764,0.00019139535,0.7344191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912184,0.00038298313,0.000026746538,0.00008967401,0.0003256538,0.000053088257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871635,0.00096415577,0.00004212231,0.00008706422,0.00014015794,0.000050144805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011086916,0.00087935606,0.00057805923,0.00085874926,0.00069138996,0.004166084,0.000837876,0.0014776645,0.020502832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003452119,0.00025499158,0.00027337635,0.0013188488,0.0032574804,0.004045506,0.00080426526,0.0021624803,0.0065936185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008433938,0.000028479073,0.00005442487,0.00009456077,0.0000055956657,0.000021904156,0.00027101274,0.00070570665,0.00016557075,0.9165706,0.025668288,0.056405444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023042105,0.0000065612558,0.00009341469,0.00006628011,0.0000023267362,0.000030280115,0.00009852585,0.0008126477,0.00011260368,0.91708606,0.08168377,0.0000053153976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015742539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018127632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020502832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017269094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014927322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06858879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232396141","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-27772-6_36-2","title":"Behavioral Economics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.25913948660727326,"score_gpt":0.3978045030057434,"score_spread":0.13866501639847012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232396141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009014479,0.011371649,0.017162712,0.005918669,0.0009663178,0.00004435474,0.0002933612,0.00018810386,0.9631534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016646646,0.012047456,0.0053248135,0.002222606,0.00061458227,0.00010438402,0.0003423993,0.00012128809,0.96257585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996908,0.000070817456,0.000008902186,0.000049271082,0.00015392053,0.000026242522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966073,0.00012821019,0.000016404549,0.00006471749,0.00008986676,0.000040083876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055114855,0.0009878272,0.0005849623,0.0009758608,0.00064457237,0.0022636682,0.00055840565,0.001225254,0.08923428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014270567,0.00024275674,0.00027837526,0.0011139903,0.0011543884,0.0019005745,0.0008425713,0.0019472277,0.038794868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010787875,0.00006786567,0.00021556499,0.0001265846,0.000010091931,0.000021322381,0.00014503795,0.00071480754,0.00025671793,0.44613045,0.3118145,0.24048623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046124005,0.000009675482,0.00042018137,0.00018147161,0.0000050864987,0.0000459577,0.00007020422,0.0006375635,0.00015049908,0.3235728,0.6748952,0.00000670366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022986096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004387714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08923428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019438511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014522708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29851842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232578827","doi":"10.3410/f.736831598.793571328","title":"Faculty Opinions recommendation of Goal congruency dominates reward value in accounting for behavioral and neural correlates of value-based decision-making.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Neural correlates of consciousness; Psychology; Computer science; Machine learning; Neuroscience; Cognition","score_opus":0.07119474552928302,"score_gpt":0.42564506324935536,"score_spread":0.35445031772007235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232578827","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022546614,0.00034448027,0.00036340812,0.00063600537,0.00012332782,0.000050910545,0.9933298,0.00044356228,0.002453741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0065736882,0.00013426127,0.0010794854,0.00028651606,0.00003869417,0.00022706088,0.9889653,0.000069758054,0.0026253182],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899894,0.00033414,0.00009442593,0.00029173688,0.00015266884,0.00012807704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952341,0.002284151,0.00043747298,0.0009700155,0.00073248195,0.00034188287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027541758,0.0021579661,0.0011510388,0.0020781395,0.0007880586,0.0024785167,0.003364634,0.002992762,0.04800332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016981933,0.0004962135,0.0019880447,0.0023206891,0.00042357453,0.0010849729,0.0015382796,0.0019667523,0.05384051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034141808,0.00013253224,0.009152974,0.0009746812,0.0001550609,0.00003228498,0.000030412171,0.0008773461,0.00012466291,0.00087302935,0.97995114,0.007354463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027419557,0.00016366252,0.05265471,0.001210807,0.0005611456,0.0002768251,0.00021215001,0.010179487,0.0011662289,0.009924192,0.9207951,0.00011370972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021485453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05998917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04800332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014726537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022075768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16058707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233140950","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/2vz53","title":"Teaching &amp;amp; Learning Guide for: Risky-choice framing and rational decision-making","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Framing effect; Framing (construction); Narrative; Interpretation (philosophy); Rational planning model; Epistemology; Empirical research; Decision theory; Management science; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13320554899220494,"score_gpt":0.450261345456847,"score_spread":0.31705579646464205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233140950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020971287,0.004941883,0.19243094,0.01981038,0.0027238792,0.000535142,0.014527945,0.01813431,0.74479836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018449446,0.0059751957,0.15470764,0.003810586,0.0012683541,0.00089798274,0.00876027,0.009019678,0.79711086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997253,0.000073193856,0.000016205264,0.000051377974,0.000109086184,0.00002486975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981217,0.001166351,0.000069307054,0.00016026998,0.00031584187,0.00016668954],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076890044,0.001297153,0.00072998356,0.0011330027,0.0006027383,0.003081292,0.0014871575,0.0018903598,0.44968647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004882664,0.0006379797,0.0005093837,0.0013214855,0.00081328634,0.0041524265,0.0013665772,0.0018831788,0.2627583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035022967,0.000060280123,0.00018691168,0.00019715712,0.000005139647,0.00009603439,0.00020285336,0.0006009882,0.00030484935,0.038506426,0.80362976,0.1561747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003406775,0.000013303007,0.00041008068,0.0001497044,0.0000024249832,0.000085429565,0.000066765955,0.0017227929,0.00046083532,0.065060675,0.93197954,0.000014422937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033326817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006380837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44968647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011078063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001227678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78495544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233458252","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198851486.001.0001","title":"Rational Powers in Action","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.33040717382437557,"score_gpt":0.4516956300311673,"score_spread":0.12128845620679174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233458252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010418345,0.0042962623,0.015093523,0.0041139876,0.00030372464,0.00002369111,0.00005721028,0.00007473413,0.9749951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27334797,0.011222617,0.016152086,0.0031964758,0.00097536383,0.00028609813,0.00028923337,0.00024512343,0.69428504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988952,0.00045077584,0.00003278574,0.00015068545,0.00037148542,0.00009907794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987282,0.0007038797,0.000062033425,0.00020518694,0.00020218718,0.00009847813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011361295,0.0007915964,0.00047926983,0.00097286556,0.001535896,0.0064047556,0.00080933893,0.0015492529,0.016140996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022655204,0.0003018294,0.00034248488,0.00096131687,0.014609098,0.006056623,0.0022055965,0.00342047,0.0043746163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011952131,0.0000022095342,0.000008264663,0.0000088238785,6.601406e-7,0.0000063763887,0.000106857304,0.0001913338,0.000015397853,0.99310136,0.004427096,0.0021304635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031333996,0.000004295714,0.00003450204,0.000054228367,0.0000011901949,0.000021634194,0.000104632134,0.0006288853,0.00006695192,0.8433513,0.15572603,0.00000328473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002433626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021495025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016140996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044108736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021323692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05399704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233891675","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_627-1","title":"Biases","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.49530477997228206,"score_gpt":0.46725930840554675,"score_spread":0.028045471566735314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233891675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043251184,0.00164897,0.031149335,0.0054549235,0.0011712416,0.00008388159,0.00032368902,0.00032820087,0.9555146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13951263,0.004185488,0.022221135,0.005246587,0.0011835985,0.00026627208,0.00074550125,0.00060745416,0.8260314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985637,0.0002690553,0.000052733685,0.00028639912,0.0006930198,0.00013512973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807465,0.0006147088,0.00012933854,0.00045286358,0.0005929934,0.00013542146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015312517,0.0007914723,0.00037493336,0.0011988482,0.0008917277,0.0038671936,0.0009246824,0.0012345462,0.07633944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0093720835,0.00033471006,0.00040949858,0.0007311166,0.0018146874,0.0037161433,0.002289114,0.0022044627,0.033302236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049862025,0.00003724811,0.0008092256,0.0001711274,0.000024569352,0.000056467783,0.0006733383,0.00050304015,0.0018307467,0.7115728,0.064640634,0.21963091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000150924225,0.000019767265,0.0007231841,0.00019543045,0.000020437852,0.00019022098,0.00025200678,0.00076520426,0.003478105,0.421019,0.5733005,0.00002118155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013063629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014206743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07633944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001532906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016198832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234105302","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14651751.v1","title":"Deviations from Bayes' Theorem During Belief Updating in Younger and Older Adults: Evidence From Behaviour and Neural Activity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; Heuristics; Bayes' theorem; Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Young adult; Developmental psychology; Bayesian probability; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.07655386352396361,"score_gpt":0.36649835503709416,"score_spread":0.28994449151313056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234105302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985989,0.00035804053,0.00022618944,0.00003995128,0.000006419347,0.000009966953,0.000113363974,0.0000042352394,0.0006429787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99786586,0.0005536795,0.00054159365,0.00010158693,0.000014509163,0.000019665487,0.00018022116,0.0000047447365,0.0007181228],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997532,0.000030703166,0.000029700068,0.000075433796,0.00008146792,0.000029443996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980421,0.0005174715,0.00085657573,0.00012800307,0.00025300155,0.00020283578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008130919,0.000247527,0.00031285227,0.0003945596,0.000155014,0.0007788675,0.00017815949,0.0006488258,0.001460406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050222315,0.00032080527,0.00017200643,0.00021315526,0.00035506405,0.0005666231,0.0003311498,0.00047868266,0.00037022226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018497469,0.00062595174,0.8449214,0.00029609347,0.00032630598,0.00067642675,0.011955856,0.0004030665,0.07240093,0.0004580085,0.0009917034,0.065094404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019709187,0.00028072324,0.99723756,0.000012055939,0.000028210254,0.00030064833,0.00039054593,0.00023459956,0.00081255217,0.0002548143,0.00041696723,0.000011632448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024774782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038820878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024774782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015744407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014050129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0049260855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235726460","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-51161-0_1","title":"Cost-Benefit Versus Expected Utility Acceptance Rules","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Maximization; Stochastic dominance; Expected utility hypothesis; Positive economics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Management science; Econometrics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.41075627385493957,"score_gpt":0.44769182297235033,"score_spread":0.03693554911741076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235726460","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019038819,0.011081076,0.5151956,0.0075887092,0.0013277049,0.0000915312,0.00024733512,0.00017910353,0.44525018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6631711,0.014776873,0.1368236,0.001888857,0.0018462052,0.0003800019,0.0003897104,0.0003312258,0.18039247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987232,0.0005253561,0.000058570633,0.0001378147,0.000471395,0.00008368344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963381,0.0029424266,0.0001030702,0.00023370831,0.00031257884,0.00007006764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022483305,0.0008877351,0.0007416392,0.00076448213,0.000441311,0.0035093285,0.0013338551,0.0015787294,0.014082761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009360748,0.00034215936,0.0005771558,0.0010054604,0.0017338085,0.004244968,0.00076861295,0.0031246794,0.002446755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019012488,0.000028505297,0.00010895772,0.00008013676,0.000013189901,0.000023842953,0.00007670089,0.0038864322,0.00017438795,0.9338359,0.00556466,0.056188244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039795436,0.0000066061566,0.000071512026,0.00004276752,0.000006546307,0.00002797136,0.000023156057,0.007981879,0.00013787669,0.98364985,0.008041365,0.0000064612846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005226299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000536553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014082761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001206708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007055091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04711151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235997834","doi":"10.24124/2018/58843","title":"Uncertain-monetary promotions: A consumer motivational perspective.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Regulatory focus theory; Promotion (chess); Attractiveness; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Marketing; Business; Psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.1447302497561931,"score_gpt":0.4385586099542296,"score_spread":0.2938283601980365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235997834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8219012,0.007821799,0.016493907,0.010067493,0.00015201386,0.00017096219,0.00013693316,0.000015299784,0.1432404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99289906,0.0014125188,0.0029637015,0.00048691852,0.000055659355,0.0000346707,0.000022774188,0.0000028744264,0.002121792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955136,0.00025790554,0.0000117953,0.000048103735,0.000087745095,0.000043065458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973014,0.0019788651,0.0003123036,0.000053366213,0.00014387182,0.0002102526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017021456,0.00040193464,0.00015693446,0.0005998557,0.00048113873,0.0022916137,0.00029703524,0.00087993196,0.0046916986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038865176,0.00017622986,0.0003398037,0.00033807015,0.0010387177,0.0017805751,0.0006007828,0.0012022051,0.0002033905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014149587,0.0027758924,0.16606861,0.0016804187,0.00025445098,0.0011362592,0.024118386,0.0037716888,0.007750133,0.56022197,0.0040810644,0.22672616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020192734,0.0024861887,0.5511613,0.0016873591,0.0005410616,0.0018438802,0.045590863,0.021719009,0.0050240546,0.29092962,0.07861887,0.00019589283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005532897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011290836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046916986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008584874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043974127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015695274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236164238","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/dnkcz","title":"Thinking in a foreign language distorts allocation of cognitive effort: Evidence from reasoning.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Narodowym Centrum Nauki","keywords":"Syllogism; Logical reasoning; Foreign language; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.11229728898278578,"score_gpt":0.4056076443021786,"score_spread":0.2933103553193928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236164238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98787946,0.0002537724,0.0017280837,0.0003383501,0.000027987027,0.00003166281,0.0002588793,0.00003510008,0.0094467355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962141,0.0001415862,0.0015999159,0.0003272674,0.000018085724,0.000054921587,0.0003213699,0.00007767998,0.0012450377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744475,0.00087843917,0.00015235489,0.00062051043,0.0007346364,0.00016944497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94179475,0.03314856,0.012362031,0.008401728,0.0017797801,0.0025131905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053423797,0.0004960922,0.0004944213,0.0006441287,0.00041599793,0.0019182065,0.0007609523,0.00089054107,0.008972016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04601357,0.0005146941,0.00034980124,0.0003728685,0.0027717669,0.0015551968,0.0019802896,0.0012616178,0.0010437071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.040136177,0.009569348,0.5202273,0.0025112932,0.00287558,0.002555703,0.026904402,0.0040430385,0.21476719,0.018199274,0.007988332,0.15022236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014714502,0.0023185816,0.9408409,0.00012983564,0.00065982406,0.0014440236,0.001806826,0.004431032,0.019472603,0.023278723,0.0040078294,0.00013838711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00224732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018751391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008972016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044117827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000460688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030014396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236212379","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_626","title":"Heuristics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Heuristics; Operating system","score_opus":0.27482052644624455,"score_gpt":0.4133903640068509,"score_spread":0.13856983756060637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236212379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019591777,0.001735429,0.06879903,0.0015221494,0.0004896501,0.00013484152,0.0005882176,0.00082350953,0.92394793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06754621,0.0036745938,0.076483846,0.0013820789,0.00032813606,0.00026027355,0.0019398229,0.000625379,0.84775966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994479,0.00014686883,0.000026416235,0.00012126949,0.0002031089,0.000054400418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918824,0.00034264594,0.00002915386,0.00023958625,0.00015089146,0.000049442267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055979576,0.0011135457,0.000455197,0.0013431062,0.00081519544,0.0036461945,0.0012422611,0.0011004139,0.13418113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036984554,0.00044640386,0.00058150466,0.0013242471,0.0011492426,0.0031701983,0.0012395941,0.0015557751,0.04592051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003408374,0.00006466625,0.00020235406,0.00020174978,0.000017808661,0.000057047087,0.00022251181,0.003914867,0.0006141469,0.6352785,0.12228126,0.23711097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001500926,0.000024263798,0.00022908345,0.00013150892,0.000013929368,0.00014695484,0.0001322888,0.0056956643,0.0009862967,0.39853394,0.5940747,0.000016225027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018473213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027638911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13418113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013864276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014538047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236801214","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_627","title":"Biases","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.41818560886549183,"score_gpt":0.4364041179637958,"score_spread":0.01821850909830397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236801214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026941313,0.0008716046,0.017660046,0.0030942103,0.0006932622,0.00006343378,0.00027571173,0.00028178853,0.9743658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07387319,0.0018821202,0.012885547,0.0033473123,0.0005590723,0.00016359238,0.0005504498,0.00045474758,0.906284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987507,0.0002367265,0.000041763677,0.00023826188,0.00061575696,0.000116721116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981,0.0005985915,0.00010766024,0.00046952182,0.0005922886,0.00013199441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012933926,0.00074581394,0.00034700954,0.0012204883,0.0009600519,0.0038165147,0.0008968376,0.0012673452,0.11673902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008097686,0.00035132302,0.0003684175,0.0007562292,0.0015085744,0.0034468935,0.0020704987,0.0019970264,0.051973425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052784868,0.000041271094,0.0009050057,0.00016006021,0.000020568245,0.00007188744,0.00082383567,0.0004601507,0.0019504932,0.6516832,0.10420987,0.23962088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012503737,0.000017280632,0.0007394071,0.00013647252,0.000014224207,0.00020346197,0.00025538207,0.0006534112,0.0025006353,0.26947382,0.72597694,0.000016378272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001594388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001941999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11673902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014257426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013802719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237539246","doi":"10.17771/pucrio.acad.53029","title":"ESSAYS ON BEHAVIORAL FINANCE","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; McMaster University","keywords":"Weighting; Prospect theory; Cumulative prospect theory; Predictive power; Preference; Empirical research; Econometrics; Expected utility hypothesis; Framing (construction); Attractiveness; Function (biology); Economics; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Psychology; Epistemology; Microeconomics; Geography; Statistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17011684089423756,"score_gpt":0.463179215404956,"score_spread":0.2930623745107184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237539246","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011577107,0.13276567,0.025803996,0.40932578,0.07389311,0.00011521566,0.0013043779,0.00020639102,0.3450083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22349793,0.12739205,0.013397578,0.09297261,0.09667577,0.00047553284,0.0014376923,0.00028476818,0.443866],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909174,0.00038138902,0.00005077007,0.00012526922,0.00028447274,0.00006647721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944722,0.0039247954,0.00023949034,0.00022638515,0.00080305064,0.0003340151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020934977,0.00085518614,0.0005869211,0.001700359,0.0012671067,0.0024718835,0.00046673056,0.0020029263,0.013802652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010014733,0.00019351406,0.00068577594,0.001150248,0.0026789668,0.002724686,0.0008529084,0.0035436112,0.0038291337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003601823,0.00007595535,0.0005600199,0.00021446997,0.000021303395,0.00007780443,0.0005958701,0.0010590685,0.00021269545,0.44729,0.5071748,0.042681947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000128732545,0.000038656446,0.0014505704,0.0004952031,0.000006906076,0.000103796294,0.00032688936,0.00081711356,0.000067124536,0.22138427,0.77527803,0.000018643845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010510525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000749595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013802652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020262308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010859314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046174467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237784729","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/ma7rb","title":"Negative Context Reduces the Discriminability of Verbal Probabilities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Negation; Context effect; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Cognitive psychology; Event (particle physics); Social psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Communication; Word (group theory); History","score_opus":0.3639614586971992,"score_gpt":0.44068385196592863,"score_spread":0.07672239326872943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237784729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99231225,0.00007088719,0.0014681185,0.00014068643,0.000025577889,0.000017485907,0.000014344775,0.000020230089,0.0059304545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99727756,0.000053127085,0.0019224839,0.0001609864,0.000025861424,0.00001386659,0.000028904702,0.000020609265,0.0004965753],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966875,0.0014168477,0.00025482362,0.0005880304,0.0008547542,0.00019803504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763507,0.017108103,0.002659153,0.0020616434,0.0006340886,0.0011863164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023810635,0.000586416,0.0005143508,0.0004225784,0.0004714309,0.0020885246,0.000488933,0.0009941118,0.0059915483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027734764,0.00052402384,0.0003010704,0.00019823712,0.0015040488,0.0020109536,0.002516639,0.001731477,0.00031644144],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012722457,0.0026106678,0.10705914,0.0013396187,0.00032715817,0.0016707317,0.014586156,0.0028787132,0.72783303,0.016429592,0.0013871976,0.11115552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067195774,0.0064188256,0.79407036,0.00039311257,0.00054133864,0.0022607262,0.006033819,0.016289122,0.101067804,0.06333592,0.008504259,0.00041259258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000637934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000702321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059915483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031489998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002379139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02004373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238021447","doi":"10.1002/9781119547174.ch239","title":"Risk Taking","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Sensation seeking; Personality; Psychology; Construct (python library); Relevance (law); Big Five personality traits; Social psychology; Sensation; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.13402321292640612,"score_gpt":0.34691013452518815,"score_spread":0.21288692159878203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238021447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078874476,0.090794355,0.018409692,0.015929176,0.0020731278,0.00037190673,0.002036042,0.00043010025,0.79108125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.411636,0.16887672,0.0116980625,0.008233099,0.0019998353,0.00034514104,0.0024336705,0.00020551139,0.39457202],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990351,0.00021393324,0.00005713366,0.000118019925,0.00044294444,0.0001328386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903715,0.00032018978,0.00017740866,0.000098260134,0.00018325541,0.00018364994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010951745,0.0004961369,0.00035507808,0.0007449612,0.0006914924,0.0022125843,0.0005110026,0.0006811643,0.049425784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004199619,0.00013374304,0.00044631216,0.00054231985,0.0005365052,0.0012111696,0.0013394093,0.0010897176,0.009918735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013278173,0.00022061245,0.0158153,0.0007802222,0.00006382576,0.00071789924,0.0031765813,0.0005218021,0.0012369863,0.077510186,0.053591944,0.8462318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016081009,0.0002475417,0.023215802,0.0013546295,0.00005391965,0.0032401027,0.0020766004,0.00029323366,0.0008713261,0.03784255,0.93073887,0.00004942319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014171489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013918371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049425784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066306506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093192403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16534573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238190096","doi":"10.22215/etd/2020-14272","title":"Scalar implicatures under uncertainty","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Implicature; Scalar (mathematics); Probabilistic logic; Axiom; Probability theory; Interpretation (philosophy); Literal (mathematical logic); Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Pragmatics; Linguistics; Statistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.14641566515392626,"score_gpt":0.44770024879351816,"score_spread":0.3012845836395919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238190096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2976577,0.0042454335,0.29880813,0.028220005,0.00060570077,0.00011782945,0.00038794393,0.00030888926,0.36964837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771906,0.0010220851,0.01767968,0.0008023456,0.0002766155,0.000051101477,0.000120338686,0.000039577666,0.002817578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928974,0.0032512147,0.00049665174,0.0012250014,0.0017982613,0.00033148628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780161,0.015890412,0.0018620468,0.0018168399,0.002029845,0.00038483247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071675987,0.0005579359,0.0005411245,0.001277447,0.0012314797,0.0054020556,0.00092229486,0.0017411744,0.0052755857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044083618,0.00049732416,0.000745762,0.001104293,0.010684515,0.010517041,0.0025399474,0.004169589,0.0004301204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004858951,0.000026827433,0.00072674826,0.000090392554,0.00002580306,0.0001258206,0.0015144728,0.0010419355,0.00055941625,0.984863,0.0006673913,0.010309523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009796336,0.000008612887,0.0006123925,0.000028713675,0.000012604923,0.000051837244,0.00016879037,0.0017026289,0.00022484113,0.9952226,0.0019479146,0.000009209425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009279604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005347497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071675987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001994519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082968373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03790629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238506832","doi":"10.1111/cjag.2016.64.issue-4","title":"Applications of Behavioral and Experimental Economics to Decision Making in the Agricultural, Food, and Resource Sectors: An Introduction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0504477902068556,"score_gpt":0.2849680295479383,"score_spread":0.2345202393410827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238506832","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069366745,0.4359189,0.38041782,0.05940911,0.007287485,0.0005737993,0.0012353454,0.00032219564,0.1078987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09508052,0.5276059,0.32414663,0.016272658,0.009451768,0.0021813526,0.0006889001,0.0001761232,0.024396194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652976,0.00205611,0.00030539988,0.00030379323,0.00066984043,0.0001350827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824248,0.015897175,0.00031205433,0.0005123963,0.00067340356,0.00018015903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061094216,0.0018737208,0.0015852789,0.0047707236,0.00088402664,0.004339664,0.0021214525,0.0036345308,0.010666873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010882851,0.00095823465,0.0020088034,0.005420053,0.006046135,0.005618936,0.0023684967,0.0051602744,0.0012149238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037442027,0.00035620402,0.0009975745,0.0020453925,0.0000707246,0.00014068915,0.000378793,0.0051347115,0.00044819355,0.8461674,0.0120308725,0.13219206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028515115,0.000072249575,0.0013076043,0.0016304606,0.000024090486,0.00016247199,0.0002666204,0.0050984463,0.0003720897,0.8685071,0.1224523,0.000078047895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007071582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011255153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010666873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037129936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034894461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035684288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238924615","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v22i12.3878","title":"A Method for Diagnosing the Causes of Escalating Commitment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decision maker; Management science; Computer science; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Economics; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.16637593919381946,"score_gpt":0.382025206416582,"score_spread":0.21564926722276254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238924615","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014885231,0.00011973829,0.97476804,0.0006097316,0.00008083522,0.00051107263,0.00041577622,0.00081780745,0.0077917455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19379622,0.0001244895,0.8018714,0.00014774714,0.000020172225,0.00086020643,0.0003221169,0.000065200744,0.0027923645],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961637,0.0014133011,0.00023351348,0.0007515823,0.0012518228,0.0001862133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837803,0.010305302,0.0014724728,0.0017092976,0.0024024681,0.00033006494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004529094,0.0011592181,0.00087811693,0.0070403623,0.0012660513,0.0024243663,0.0020179236,0.002188793,0.00931351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036529925,0.00061803946,0.0011113214,0.0037011974,0.0016137395,0.0035314756,0.0020730174,0.0022036866,0.0018089336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004537328,0.0005442748,0.041723724,0.0007670679,0.0002559888,0.0012508677,0.0037738946,0.034096662,0.012416971,0.30678663,0.012307576,0.58562267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001560443,0.00028581984,0.009679121,0.00028358854,0.00010039901,0.0026716895,0.0020287533,0.674091,0.011853612,0.27270225,0.025877278,0.00027046044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032116903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033255508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00931351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016451661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036336966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031156838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239508753","doi":"10.32920/14638635.v1","title":"Decisions from experience: adaptive information search and choice in younger and older adults","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Cognition; Psychology; Neuropsychology; Valence (chemistry); Cognitive psychology; Affect (linguistics); Psychiatry","score_opus":0.14043805600269083,"score_gpt":0.40797124856968847,"score_spread":0.26753319256699765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239508753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995247,0.000099238474,0.000045590637,0.0000235094,0.000002328725,0.0000042049014,0.000032256878,7.804582e-7,0.0002674282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990834,0.00010451168,0.00014180064,0.00006291159,0.000008022482,0.000008151849,0.000068883535,0.0000014008473,0.0005209045],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971324,0.00004432588,0.00004162451,0.00008895228,0.00007062548,0.00004121386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847883,0.00045301436,0.00043533134,0.000108549546,0.00012327755,0.0004009988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012708592,0.00032243712,0.00049251626,0.0005497372,0.00037470023,0.0011271273,0.00016797853,0.000697115,0.0024338216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050106836,0.0002430328,0.00023342835,0.0002643666,0.0006097392,0.0013096618,0.0007211338,0.000568103,0.0003532097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027005428,0.0016750726,0.93553245,0.00010096327,0.00008180396,0.0004975746,0.014680364,0.0003297618,0.008958398,0.0005888203,0.00047743935,0.0343768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046306468,0.0008907281,0.99324954,0.0000121476705,0.000024600735,0.00040782546,0.0023711445,0.0005801393,0.00064154353,0.001186966,0.0005649326,0.000024126246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028583019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033057057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028583019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021200418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019194964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008141875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240091398","doi":"10.3982/ecta16467","title":"Present Bias","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econometrica","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Axiom; Discounting; Preference; Class (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Hyperbolic discounting; Revealed preference; Dynamic inconsistency; Econometrics; Economics; Time preference; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.4644787090694801,"score_gpt":0.44651020906383526,"score_spread":0.017968500005644816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240091398","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19087715,0.0025698005,0.34293124,0.0074611893,0.00088155956,0.00042803102,0.002741974,0.00068313244,0.45142594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9265119,0.00091085397,0.03212385,0.0022509685,0.0003251469,0.00020571426,0.00063855393,0.00016756302,0.036865413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756694,0.0006625576,0.00017934262,0.00059864053,0.0007567511,0.00023573851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99429446,0.0022044159,0.0010095222,0.0013181653,0.0009353924,0.00023800481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033452685,0.0005106944,0.0004816341,0.0008848289,0.0008444332,0.0025215382,0.00082627067,0.001387668,0.026896639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017766938,0.00028701383,0.0006723253,0.0008585754,0.0019591108,0.0027042003,0.0011823227,0.0017102528,0.004160833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037605196,0.00016563715,0.013999039,0.00025584898,0.00012249127,0.0002430222,0.00095952104,0.0027472498,0.0054695355,0.855517,0.010692681,0.109451875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006544988,0.00031191442,0.01867827,0.00020481262,0.00014353887,0.0013994641,0.00054368086,0.008567964,0.0054725697,0.82669216,0.13780615,0.00011400137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011511726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012292648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026896639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010171788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067025214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08997816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241644014","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/s5ard","title":"Resource-rational approach to meta-control problems across the lifespan","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Control (management); Cognition; Resource (disambiguation); Psychology; Meta-analysis; Adaptation (eye); Cognitive aging; Economics; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.371235415926663,"score_gpt":0.4261028211373005,"score_spread":0.05486740521063754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241644014","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30741623,0.0034540545,0.6538758,0.00792328,0.00009581451,0.000121858575,0.00023447988,0.00012000766,0.026758514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9360538,0.00092773564,0.060069762,0.00026952854,0.000103259925,0.00018600814,0.00009145845,0.00003455181,0.002263926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636143,0.0020556902,0.00020699161,0.00071033405,0.0004277043,0.00023783951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870128,0.009271317,0.0016525781,0.0010633947,0.0005399173,0.0004599596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007870866,0.00091644254,0.0012137786,0.0013350879,0.0006338004,0.0032982107,0.0017203096,0.001951279,0.0033086846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020442104,0.0005921267,0.0015853681,0.0008918793,0.0038685235,0.004765949,0.002236533,0.0023481704,0.00017517841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010284102,0.00011755078,0.0050706393,0.00019685543,0.00037622667,0.00039240505,0.0007592881,0.08501954,0.0010026724,0.8852576,0.00044515214,0.021259276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030970867,0.000036415073,0.0019247109,0.000027744636,0.000041581883,0.000076040575,0.00010673873,0.11019835,0.00020587069,0.8866676,0.0006614668,0.000022503544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026317379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016656329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007870866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024423283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011391671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04162562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242806196","doi":"10.1108/978-1-80071-817-320211002","title":"Overcoming Irrationality: The Popperian Approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Irrationality; Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Sociology; Philosophy; Rationality","score_opus":0.26452028734202415,"score_gpt":0.3866511234006699,"score_spread":0.12213083605864578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242806196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062732114,0.011257139,0.25021052,0.050121915,0.001028123,0.0000739387,0.00007944457,0.00022554537,0.68073004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6053468,0.019049928,0.1982979,0.020271385,0.0018215699,0.00058960664,0.00011750708,0.0007644629,0.15374087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99449867,0.0032091218,0.00014246767,0.0005120209,0.0013724766,0.00026526992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910157,0.006809841,0.00036837027,0.0009293172,0.0007055028,0.00017129826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007329242,0.0012579646,0.0012669734,0.0018668238,0.0018737377,0.007527693,0.0019898687,0.003412938,0.00696905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015456063,0.00054051954,0.0007932607,0.0016670688,0.020681152,0.009974902,0.0037706976,0.00670313,0.0017989478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048846005,0.000010110226,0.00003041133,0.00003615218,0.000006537147,0.000013999774,0.0002078471,0.00065348373,0.000038910555,0.9864725,0.0034998488,0.009025286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027528833,0.000003666836,0.000016562699,0.000029720399,0.0000024729693,0.0000134721995,0.000065859975,0.00097213534,0.000067494686,0.98326784,0.015554313,0.000003728333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011712946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013665446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007527693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003178828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028646118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0387612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243517039","doi":"10.3917/ecop.159.0105","title":"Généralisation de l'espérance d'utilité : le cas des jeux de loterie en France","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Économie & prévision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nautical Research Society","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07881348929308107,"score_gpt":0.3682670373736771,"score_spread":0.28945354808059603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243517039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9720587,0.0011485518,0.00082557235,0.0021021387,0.00001367398,0.000011000814,0.00016967428,0.000019960615,0.023650717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955277,0.00031219714,0.00019791708,0.000108715634,0.000012840771,0.0000042378983,0.00009493847,0.000005189333,0.0037362487],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867105,0.0003408819,0.000041648826,0.00016591778,0.00028842135,0.000492002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769104,0.0010116554,0.00049126847,0.00014616808,0.00045412596,0.00020581123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015760618,0.00027339565,0.00034695546,0.0025008854,0.0027279842,0.0031777737,0.00072606467,0.0012670911,0.017389607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035106493,0.0001724699,0.00053374196,0.002356049,0.0018421719,0.001471563,0.0013713432,0.0011033304,0.00057610497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040679442,0.00028857726,0.72554135,0.00027293907,0.00025972162,0.0053296094,0.043057725,0.006603048,0.0017882047,0.11878318,0.010593252,0.08707566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040143186,0.00017198427,0.8948965,0.00012715111,0.00006575334,0.0014655425,0.031897206,0.0049062422,0.0004750835,0.013252028,0.052626073,0.00007623914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24570942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39175883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24570942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004602021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013787244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48855847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244185607","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14646000.v1","title":"Decision Making Under Risk Across Different Contexts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Quality (philosophy); Event (particle physics); Decision quality; Psychology; Actuarial science; Economics; Operations management; Geography","score_opus":0.15248665554039428,"score_gpt":0.4659299394577652,"score_spread":0.31344328391737086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244185607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96235824,0.0007578406,0.020899512,0.000633378,0.00005553778,0.0001317376,0.000049580576,0.000021481732,0.015092805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890253,0.00034109474,0.009786667,0.00012332326,0.000021713402,0.000069203226,0.00006416013,0.000011069326,0.00055741717],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98677737,0.008679184,0.000556514,0.0011674861,0.0020911759,0.0007282762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745181,0.016996017,0.0034729354,0.0016747012,0.0013739126,0.0019642157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009628599,0.00072742696,0.00085898617,0.0009965441,0.00093527307,0.0053955982,0.0006423686,0.0013861518,0.0047273417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045872975,0.0003356834,0.001128237,0.0005391645,0.0025886206,0.0032386342,0.0031429345,0.0018232977,0.0003032809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009348502,0.0024530566,0.29306772,0.0022927234,0.0022780239,0.003178955,0.027901083,0.057988815,0.028127074,0.2027203,0.002735184,0.36790857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043435895,0.0034399505,0.2488695,0.0010239694,0.0008562032,0.0011650345,0.018466964,0.0837742,0.0062705213,0.62247694,0.012802352,0.0004200635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085830095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011605849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009628599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011520573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000913609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0509215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244976668","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-5478-3.ch023","title":"Economic Decision Making, Emotion, and Prefrontal Cortex","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroeconomics; Consumer neuroscience; Prefrontal cortex; Psychology; Self-reference effect; Posterior parietal cortex; Cognitive psychology; Anterior cingulate cortex; Neuroscience; Social decision making; Decision-making; Cognitive science; Cognition; Economics","score_opus":0.05292380798354687,"score_gpt":0.3471795807916345,"score_spread":0.2942557728080877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244976668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014379318,0.24241418,0.011326865,0.013453556,0.0016820506,0.00002310126,0.00026551657,0.000096984375,0.71635836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27228266,0.24084292,0.014301337,0.0044253203,0.0030697885,0.00008490122,0.00044321708,0.00011137132,0.46443844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999558,0.000009119711,0.0000013074542,0.000012214607,0.00001477153,0.000006804413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99993587,0.000043993452,0.000005002239,0.0000030194287,0.0000066128246,0.000005609957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016129875,0.00032979914,0.0001730227,0.00028653975,0.00028786613,0.0015416075,0.00028466526,0.0005411926,0.011390015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002602708,0.00012290149,0.00020166051,0.00047858345,0.00095690775,0.0010952867,0.000347035,0.0010836445,0.0019211984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043882224,0.000039024857,0.00048797196,0.00043481457,0.000022346558,0.00018340512,0.0010029436,0.002181349,0.0018669984,0.6389542,0.08916753,0.26561546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012042692,0.000022410526,0.0041885353,0.0006358654,0.000013753396,0.00047701938,0.0003823306,0.0013593514,0.00055671914,0.44084722,0.5514844,0.000020328567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001184245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015753298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011390015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008850102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050907326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038103342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245033913","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14651751","title":"Deviations from Bayes' Theorem During Belief Updating in Younger and Older Adults: Evidence From Behaviour and Neural Activity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; Heuristics; Bayes' theorem; Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Young adult; Developmental psychology; Bayesian probability; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.07655386352396361,"score_gpt":0.36649835503709416,"score_spread":0.28994449151313056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245033913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985989,0.00035804053,0.00022618944,0.00003995128,0.000006419347,0.000009966953,0.000113363974,0.0000042352394,0.0006429787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99786586,0.0005536795,0.00054159365,0.00010158693,0.000014509163,0.000019665487,0.00018022116,0.0000047447365,0.0007181228],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997532,0.000030703166,0.000029700068,0.000075433796,0.00008146792,0.000029443996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980421,0.0005174715,0.00085657573,0.00012800307,0.00025300155,0.00020283578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008130919,0.000247527,0.00031285227,0.0003945596,0.000155014,0.0007788675,0.00017815949,0.0006488258,0.001460406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050222315,0.00032080527,0.00017200643,0.00021315526,0.00035506405,0.0005666231,0.0003311498,0.00047868266,0.00037022226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018497469,0.00062595174,0.8449214,0.00029609347,0.00032630598,0.00067642675,0.011955856,0.0004030665,0.07240093,0.0004580085,0.0009917034,0.065094404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019709187,0.00028072324,0.99723756,0.000012055939,0.000028210254,0.00030064833,0.00039054593,0.00023459956,0.00081255217,0.0002548143,0.00041696723,0.000011632448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024774782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038820878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024774782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015744407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014050129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0049260855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245479670","doi":"10.17722/ijme.v9i3.374","title":"Break-Even Analysis as a powerful tool in Decision-Making","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management Excellence","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05264939498581956,"score_gpt":0.43381627507174875,"score_spread":0.3811668800859292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245479670","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011424954,0.00045649437,0.9733525,0.0012923158,0.00018747027,0.000095526084,0.00016591138,0.0006664685,0.012358312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40904164,0.0005760568,0.58362454,0.00035772336,0.0002616096,0.000488746,0.00020546686,0.00052953896,0.0049147164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99337417,0.004199156,0.00030181752,0.0005106295,0.0013427737,0.0002714352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9366719,0.054190714,0.0028283515,0.0035838578,0.001510743,0.001214428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013443052,0.0015886177,0.0017014317,0.005288837,0.002091532,0.0049604233,0.0018704196,0.0017417256,0.018915107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053338043,0.00074443675,0.0012135266,0.0030287765,0.004151372,0.010231866,0.0047944593,0.0049959966,0.0015259156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004449162,0.0001526614,0.0017677506,0.0003167529,0.00015605708,0.00022053713,0.00090580457,0.026684362,0.0018193692,0.8259236,0.005100506,0.13650756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026399153,0.00005391866,0.00028279444,0.00005455434,0.000025865522,0.00004627093,0.00017004917,0.08012357,0.0007081684,0.91383654,0.0046443925,0.000027453421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010361691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010095157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018915107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013216233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019214968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07109451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245561046","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/my4hd","title":"Living near the edge: How extreme outcomes and their neighbours drive risky choice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Salience (neuroscience); Salient; Odds; Psychology; Outcome (game theory); Perception; Extreme value theory; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Logistic regression; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.20895204336355575,"score_gpt":0.3942458066075788,"score_spread":0.18529376324402305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245561046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99699366,0.000098184726,0.0008830358,0.00007845458,0.0000047810245,0.0000036507022,0.00002741212,0.000005851547,0.0019051114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985947,0.00006846968,0.0007201214,0.000047436017,0.0000036807407,0.00000525029,0.00004733687,0.000012153288,0.00050081377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993554,0.00028091995,0.000025622718,0.00017791915,0.000099070756,0.000061035666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951998,0.0029495496,0.0006585299,0.00047606268,0.00015302257,0.00056301325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014345715,0.00018840667,0.00056164386,0.0003887485,0.0003645859,0.00225532,0.0003449104,0.0007253464,0.0053470386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00987875,0.00026698955,0.00029435707,0.00028886605,0.0009109795,0.0014761419,0.001306417,0.0009304978,0.0004255859],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006878531,0.0018857367,0.77705026,0.0004616675,0.00061464653,0.001009664,0.010659302,0.0076123797,0.06996432,0.01405389,0.0017229542,0.108086616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011257886,0.0011870286,0.9286337,0.000088634995,0.0003211712,0.0006422498,0.0038643612,0.012498132,0.00478386,0.045034446,0.0027201572,0.000113697846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010548774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013805592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053470386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019869374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001570641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017887652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246475774","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_3-1","title":"Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.31252907887780607,"score_gpt":0.4224497992122344,"score_spread":0.10992072033442835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246475774","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02958756,0.0031693012,0.6507439,0.0016925554,0.0006736483,0.00031461538,0.0024674232,0.0006226812,0.31072828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48433825,0.005541009,0.37982327,0.00063119055,0.00042623363,0.0011958396,0.003859176,0.00024702516,0.12393802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985152,0.00039501186,0.0001282823,0.00022556262,0.0006218577,0.00011406868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997035,0.0009995807,0.00026523523,0.00047046694,0.0009932828,0.00023631737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025566116,0.0009967117,0.00061303965,0.0017105932,0.00050342124,0.0029203908,0.0010967713,0.0006602706,0.02096664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008758924,0.00038939185,0.0004126557,0.0015808158,0.0010970257,0.0041448497,0.0011595362,0.0013321997,0.0047714957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026992205,0.00010146404,0.0014994348,0.0001637449,0.000030760828,0.00004529244,0.00017599846,0.0059778183,0.0027546547,0.6622509,0.012635866,0.31409422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002479733,0.00018638518,0.0024287417,0.00014822274,0.000025325655,0.00017442103,0.00018173052,0.031311404,0.002411333,0.90970665,0.053345315,0.000055666755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009900985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011598394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02096664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016776642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013259212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07014042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246619927","doi":"10.32920/14668917.v1","title":"The Effect of Time Pressure on Risky Financial Decisions from Description and Decisions from Experience","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Risk-seeking; Economics; Actuarial science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09418522141655992,"score_gpt":0.372694988609122,"score_spread":0.27850976719256204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246619927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948026,0.00014673022,0.00069322606,0.00007799876,0.000025025778,0.00003152006,0.00006796267,0.000009133012,0.004145789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99629885,0.00016543435,0.0017921998,0.00008981096,0.000035296514,0.00011490556,0.00012517556,0.000019863284,0.0013584238],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975817,0.0011105529,0.00016877889,0.00025734233,0.00067794276,0.00020367243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95459676,0.03524829,0.004170511,0.0020146272,0.0007439551,0.0032257636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002697913,0.00052872096,0.0005272821,0.00036211335,0.00037109046,0.0018120877,0.00041074087,0.00079370494,0.009759251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026617518,0.00028618154,0.00042206445,0.00032682906,0.000755851,0.0011127695,0.0011422988,0.0014408544,0.00043463527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07792167,0.03333662,0.2788628,0.0022737584,0.0013389912,0.0021359383,0.008003061,0.014408388,0.2833265,0.013951844,0.0025086724,0.28193164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017456401,0.030614601,0.89029396,0.00024498225,0.00055564725,0.00080240075,0.002213582,0.014801103,0.031307373,0.021068648,0.0060017086,0.0003502502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047712697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051269046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009759251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003509615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038191382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032647908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247480983","doi":"10.1207/s15327043hup2001_2","title":"The Effects of Self-Efficacy on Behavior in Escalation Situations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Performance","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Self-efficacy; Negative feedback; Social psychology; Interaction; Perception; Positive feedback; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07204022670432507,"score_gpt":0.39500133980670166,"score_spread":0.3229611131023766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247480983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991448,0.000018188297,0.00012831547,0.0000123701575,0.000002979332,0.000021403579,0.000013533176,0.0000046550117,0.0006538296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991129,0.000021152275,0.00040504837,0.000016184591,0.0000048672086,0.00007557134,0.00003560208,0.0000029298444,0.00032557233],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978823,0.0011892286,0.00011953135,0.00022893085,0.00034767186,0.00023228952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9596781,0.029579367,0.0048276167,0.0022076801,0.0008984822,0.002808637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004034403,0.0004308404,0.00039444078,0.00056303665,0.00032594785,0.0008644521,0.0002848909,0.00047984807,0.0025307334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017596286,0.00026353137,0.00041269205,0.00022575511,0.00082725624,0.00048010063,0.0006367311,0.0011776777,0.00022900442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02018624,0.053130835,0.8032403,0.0002324166,0.0006046426,0.00032887838,0.0059052883,0.0034329414,0.045462083,0.0017969229,0.00046439786,0.06521505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017283228,0.013650259,0.97698236,0.00002243836,0.00008506466,0.00006313125,0.00041484457,0.002993254,0.004539725,0.000690356,0.00034630552,0.00003943181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046468564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005418306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004034403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029619678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002928028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021336198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247756014","doi":"10.4000/laboreal.6342","title":"Carga mental","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Laboreal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cegep de Sept Iles","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.05235341542435849,"score_gpt":0.36610274286047706,"score_spread":0.31374932743611855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247756014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05197024,0.0020417576,0.008678322,0.026072944,0.00060976954,0.00010757074,0.0002664281,0.0001317993,0.9101212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86259615,0.002618699,0.0032848509,0.005016651,0.00020294847,0.00011637602,0.00022128348,0.000057919242,0.12588498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987484,0.00040403075,0.00003333439,0.00018414378,0.00032434333,0.00030571286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989329,0.00022881612,0.0001502665,0.00016646409,0.00025616123,0.00026536454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011843691,0.0005587552,0.00026687782,0.0010563667,0.0025693583,0.006248539,0.0006837845,0.0017808955,0.03212748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032007196,0.00017763654,0.0006160376,0.00052716,0.00975699,0.0024620735,0.0038677093,0.0023440924,0.0030592664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047474558,0.000066839624,0.0023035842,0.000113804876,0.000035024776,0.00039753012,0.014284476,0.00045643188,0.00092419755,0.91889864,0.024098054,0.03837402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034296725,0.0000937063,0.008935654,0.0003937652,0.000048853075,0.0009949707,0.02605321,0.00079748477,0.00075851846,0.37423488,0.58759266,0.00006195812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0080058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005964788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03212748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003896414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003223123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10747707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248008665","doi":"10.1002/0470018860.s00504","title":"Counterfactual Thinking","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0572854262444517,"score_gpt":0.39306178538030895,"score_spread":0.33577635913585724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248008665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008932405,0.0046401825,0.48491606,0.006298394,0.0011671375,0.00021572421,0.00051710353,0.00053541147,0.4927776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55447567,0.01217865,0.35179138,0.00295756,0.0018571968,0.0011049943,0.001784673,0.0004283309,0.07342162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938292,0.0034441948,0.00035133716,0.00078670884,0.0014531675,0.00013528169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98923606,0.0074543688,0.0006178186,0.0016799577,0.00078922516,0.00022253647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059625297,0.0014905148,0.0007054234,0.0038032837,0.00095756666,0.010656959,0.0023698255,0.0021906453,0.032983005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020962821,0.0005321489,0.0013803021,0.0026348413,0.0084679425,0.0100772455,0.0028018167,0.0035520112,0.004176344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017173175,0.000012942364,0.00006469189,0.00008351864,0.00001739245,0.00004625716,0.00029375133,0.0005998611,0.000098597084,0.9837854,0.0022056778,0.012774947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009544835,0.000003693975,0.000047814465,0.000081812104,0.000007819117,0.000053315867,0.00006833487,0.0014435794,0.000164412,0.9809528,0.017160727,0.0000061880855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011191005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001007214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032983005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022469629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014440296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110339165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249443823","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/5u9jq","title":"Valence bias in metacontrol of decision making in adolescents and young adults","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Framing effect; Framing (construction); Psychology; Valence (chemistry); Cognition; Young adult; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.1706091423540632,"score_gpt":0.4089149332879135,"score_spread":0.23830579093385032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249443823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99937326,0.00008454806,0.00010216646,0.000009204289,0.000002648301,0.0000033005317,0.000014409614,0.000001156732,0.00040931973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999485,0.000060282193,0.00018847325,0.000012557473,0.000002715112,0.0000056670533,0.000032864846,0.0000011993462,0.00021114928],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998066,0.000038072343,0.000016475431,0.00004870911,0.00006292063,0.000027297367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790156,0.00073477236,0.0008130195,0.00011173216,0.00018672326,0.00025218303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008981635,0.00016302933,0.00017201464,0.00036587662,0.00015894297,0.00083535776,0.000088059904,0.00025813535,0.00088046154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034971102,0.00019676321,0.00015783639,0.000119201344,0.0002821309,0.00031018496,0.00031679551,0.000518405,0.0001233073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005016583,0.000393254,0.9591884,0.00004968483,0.000045644178,0.00018374335,0.0042290282,0.00012240435,0.015849551,0.0004841801,0.00012838919,0.018824069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008355564,0.0002238462,0.99679345,0.000010114341,0.000016518525,0.00017097163,0.0005609088,0.00025009052,0.0013956892,0.00032614748,0.00023612024,0.000007786772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068458257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011964353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0008981635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014439886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012592907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0047500134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249899931","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14646000","title":"Decision Making Under Risk Across Different Contexts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Quality (philosophy); Event (particle physics); Decision quality; Rare events; Psychology; Actuarial science; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Operations management; Geography","score_opus":0.15248665554039428,"score_gpt":0.4659299394577652,"score_spread":0.31344328391737086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249899931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96235824,0.0007578406,0.020899512,0.000633378,0.00005553778,0.0001317376,0.000049580576,0.000021481732,0.015092805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890253,0.00034109474,0.009786667,0.00012332326,0.000021713402,0.000069203226,0.00006416013,0.000011069326,0.00055741717],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98677737,0.008679184,0.000556514,0.0011674861,0.0020911759,0.0007282762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745181,0.016996017,0.0034729354,0.0016747012,0.0013739126,0.0019642157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009628599,0.00072742696,0.00085898617,0.0009965441,0.00093527307,0.0053955982,0.0006423686,0.0013861518,0.0047273417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045872975,0.0003356834,0.001128237,0.0005391645,0.0025886206,0.0032386342,0.0031429345,0.0018232977,0.0003032809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009348502,0.0024530566,0.29306772,0.0022927234,0.0022780239,0.003178955,0.027901083,0.057988815,0.028127074,0.2027203,0.002735184,0.36790857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043435895,0.0034399505,0.2488695,0.0010239694,0.0008562032,0.0011650345,0.018466964,0.0837742,0.0062705213,0.62247694,0.012802352,0.0004200635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085830095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011605849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009628599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011520573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000913609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0509215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249947943","doi":"10.4324/9780203496398-12","title":"Egocentric Biases in Availability and Attribution","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Social Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":662,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.26749866006345757,"score_gpt":0.40293785381664093,"score_spread":0.13543919375318336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249947943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25743103,0.026682008,0.24293149,0.008003976,0.0008529135,0.000054030494,0.00038427036,0.0002166009,0.4634437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9326622,0.0068608974,0.022845315,0.00033810444,0.0003711308,0.000054655622,0.000119902565,0.00004985857,0.03669791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965763,0.00013522836,0.000013545804,0.00005428604,0.000119024335,0.000020242716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734783,0.0021195707,0.00014764055,0.00016619489,0.00017766592,0.000041123643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011025207,0.00028762032,0.00019605213,0.0004086808,0.00021131159,0.0017711088,0.00033037408,0.00048577035,0.0042614606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072015906,0.00024332169,0.00015451491,0.0008101658,0.0010499432,0.0025198332,0.00045501092,0.0008139721,0.00032178854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068545356,0.000060959803,0.007497659,0.00015783582,0.00007694542,0.00008267171,0.001267292,0.0048311884,0.0020165315,0.7262724,0.006906449,0.25076154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004414726,0.000014716413,0.010618159,0.000048352205,0.000020613616,0.00009868385,0.000211281,0.0056834146,0.0009080962,0.96976006,0.012618084,0.0000141053415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083373144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012646966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042614606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056787237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000361854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0142560005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250931847","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/b5a2m","title":"The effort paradox: Effort is both costly and valued","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Value (mathematics); Mental effort; Control (management); Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Artificial intelligence; Neuroscience; Machine learning; Business","score_opus":0.17902761388057345,"score_gpt":0.43514533283013374,"score_spread":0.25611771894956026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250931847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3074966,0.0522384,0.24262632,0.09378127,0.0018194225,0.00008454579,0.00061896833,0.00017398103,0.3011605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704049,0.008331475,0.009837008,0.004257806,0.00077873847,0.00006407118,0.00009819194,0.000042252937,0.0061855866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985727,0.00068282295,0.00007574039,0.00026073414,0.0002882307,0.000119823446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943944,0.0038539702,0.00060652365,0.0004644007,0.00035003526,0.0003306035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026629763,0.00045160798,0.00045634396,0.0007505643,0.00061880687,0.003202109,0.0007506108,0.0019243859,0.004587675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01126466,0.00017971123,0.0004623168,0.0007892347,0.0049748807,0.006056334,0.0018388535,0.0020877516,0.000449583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009959757,0.000036489084,0.0018161788,0.00023145537,0.000058258363,0.00013588871,0.00024300606,0.0012914636,0.00060878624,0.96041197,0.002151725,0.032915093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001762321,0.000024013962,0.00181549,0.00014735933,0.00002467958,0.00012140386,0.00013078541,0.0015707673,0.00020175004,0.9876572,0.008273578,0.000015323902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044646196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005352234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004587675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009284264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071568415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015347302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250934738","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_3","title":"Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.2834393150543603,"score_gpt":0.3908684707216172,"score_spread":0.10742915566725686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250934738","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025858665,0.0021803905,0.5458596,0.0012698459,0.00055539777,0.00039073275,0.0034139766,0.0007758301,0.41969553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40673092,0.0037997344,0.400085,0.00054979295,0.00028307125,0.0014054675,0.004597096,0.0002636384,0.18228523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862945,0.00036743807,0.000113515336,0.00018823578,0.00059423863,0.00010705067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688953,0.001080166,0.0002439552,0.00050146517,0.0010681081,0.00021678982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023177345,0.00085798325,0.00062310195,0.0017585828,0.0005089818,0.0026173089,0.0010741425,0.0006441216,0.02775967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078105065,0.00039396767,0.00037964596,0.001569531,0.00081694045,0.0037535625,0.0009985466,0.0012190987,0.005957411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003464784,0.0001259502,0.0018048865,0.00016346958,0.000027587439,0.00005406321,0.00017472851,0.007289578,0.0031801176,0.6002366,0.017567322,0.3690292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003687104,0.0003432656,0.004485962,0.0001744265,0.000032796936,0.00032277862,0.0002798952,0.051839385,0.0037031572,0.84846073,0.090248145,0.00007264753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011387456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015188414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02775967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014431209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012172236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09286535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251314509","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v8n6p79","title":"Expected Winning Probabilities in Sequential Truels under Uniform Distributions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Conjecture; Sequential estimation; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.08631143428977427,"score_gpt":0.38676363064836405,"score_spread":0.3004521963585898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251314509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59361756,0.00016482534,0.394803,0.00077432976,0.00004456602,0.00019673654,0.00041963413,0.0002491277,0.009730187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97462535,0.000094045754,0.02001355,0.00011367529,0.000029139572,0.00022616885,0.00021241998,0.000043451135,0.004642315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475384,0.0021954211,0.00022835899,0.0010031874,0.0008258544,0.000993307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94832134,0.04061828,0.0044340654,0.002966057,0.0017614901,0.0018987126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014620142,0.000597677,0.0012435035,0.0011343661,0.0007302831,0.0023236256,0.0023892883,0.0011968822,0.012641949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057593163,0.00056904973,0.0009850134,0.00066736183,0.003229298,0.0063495836,0.0022375316,0.00198415,0.0012022903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001559073,0.00043667902,0.04148772,0.00037801277,0.00020848132,0.0012011,0.0015233262,0.20596355,0.0036261084,0.67949355,0.004096752,0.06002558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015831618,0.00045540868,0.010324636,0.000054267886,0.00004447501,0.0006199384,0.00066609116,0.509373,0.002526523,0.47448298,0.0011776189,0.00011683081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010258137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086654845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014620142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001492462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010769044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07731962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251657215","doi":"10.1017/s0012217318000094","title":"Testing Rationality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Irrationality; Rationality; Suspect; Decision theory; Expected utility hypothesis; Evidential decision theory; Psychology; Subjective expected utility; Decision problem; Test (biology); Ecological rationality; Causal decision theory; Prospect theory; Social psychology; Mathematical economics; Decision analysis; Epistemology; Computer science; Economics; Business decision mapping; Microeconomics; Evidential reasoning approach; Philosophy; Criminology","score_opus":0.3648410174443131,"score_gpt":0.4480813042545267,"score_spread":0.08324028681021362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251657215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2818069,0.009413388,0.12098264,0.10695381,0.0028730724,0.00037486368,0.0012065641,0.00054441986,0.47584435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96806616,0.0014246968,0.018076258,0.0033000896,0.0004050295,0.00024413025,0.00037027622,0.0000778859,0.008035504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9735136,0.019446367,0.0008175277,0.0026131014,0.0027983522,0.00081101246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84881425,0.12044846,0.004951306,0.015375139,0.008182256,0.0022286572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021021934,0.0009789398,0.0012859427,0.0017891404,0.0014917481,0.004221373,0.0014329378,0.0024250976,0.01221664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14006793,0.0003975802,0.0010007075,0.0011670231,0.011033981,0.0061000446,0.0033801366,0.004308725,0.0018416739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041083494,0.00023009296,0.010021465,0.00024768143,0.00023527263,0.00016228603,0.0015185209,0.003247786,0.0008177576,0.901824,0.014917827,0.06636645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000838413,0.00007701492,0.0025760836,0.00013132113,0.000039076484,0.000061252154,0.0006854056,0.0031458666,0.00067779043,0.97661567,0.01588074,0.000025904475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018193914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008177766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021021934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023002732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022815166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111175954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251696374","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/g7jdm","title":"The conflict negativity: Neural correlate of value conflict and indecision during financial decision making","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Negativity effect; Psychology; Perception; Social psychology; Odds; Value (mathematics); Stock (firearms); Cognitive psychology; Logistic regression; Computer science","score_opus":0.13344630884352715,"score_gpt":0.4156993564868871,"score_spread":0.28225304764335996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251696374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885434,0.00019105454,0.006653483,0.00012686489,0.000023305214,0.0000401531,0.0001838954,0.000018775389,0.0042190356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99701273,0.000111883746,0.0022989116,0.00006645115,0.000013032627,0.000034864446,0.000084803745,0.000012552864,0.000364755],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997638,0.00006615424,0.000013130526,0.0000664705,0.00006677955,0.00002372478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861765,0.0008533376,0.0002977596,0.00007094994,0.00008143431,0.0000788636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004931716,0.00021716517,0.00016176097,0.00017201793,0.00012238494,0.0003787276,0.0001481995,0.0002978741,0.0019160487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00573945,0.00013874788,0.000114999144,0.00016538147,0.00037198624,0.00041881387,0.00040564532,0.00040574354,0.00010728203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019640182,0.00039736644,0.09286003,0.00051782286,0.00015174029,0.0005559822,0.0025595517,0.0015107658,0.8289751,0.0037536602,0.00093290285,0.06582121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066615314,0.0003959794,0.9713237,0.000030961335,0.00005372467,0.00091216085,0.0004556335,0.0030371714,0.013982604,0.008741074,0.00096749567,0.000032828677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035598612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044178934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019160487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001194339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010815233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006409824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252203010","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/vphgc","title":"Biased confabulation in risky choice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Confabulation (neural networks); Recall; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Task (project management); Encoding (memory); Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Episodic memory; Memory errors; Cognition; Social psychology; Decision quality; Computer science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.42276926828582717,"score_gpt":0.48276778350862376,"score_spread":0.05999851522279659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252203010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863071,0.0004478709,0.008304123,0.00016914975,0.0000075999706,0.000015258333,0.000038337497,0.000020200323,0.0046903756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964522,0.00016541044,0.0028444377,0.00006650874,0.000007872326,0.000011886789,0.000051341696,0.000011414571,0.00038887846],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972748,0.0012216575,0.0002099789,0.0004002403,0.00069356477,0.00019974587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800079,0.01161371,0.003845415,0.0029821666,0.00083325163,0.0007175465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048501943,0.0002925224,0.0005170561,0.0006637135,0.00028079905,0.0016451833,0.00044630156,0.0007576672,0.002490418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03829455,0.00039152935,0.000384813,0.0005152544,0.0017529924,0.0021580441,0.0016515456,0.0011766802,0.00023611983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0071441424,0.00089216273,0.41666713,0.001072714,0.0009086189,0.0013761368,0.014770404,0.028890532,0.06749725,0.08460518,0.0021544893,0.3740212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002492959,0.0013619764,0.5808858,0.0002358655,0.00029152984,0.002343886,0.0029187412,0.049055945,0.023698678,0.3342204,0.004461079,0.00027678118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012002817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009265694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048501943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000426963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003252578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02565056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252793816","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/ueymx","title":"Worse is Bad: Divergent Inferences From Logically Equivalent Comparisons","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Framing effect; Logical equivalence; Markedness; Psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology; Econometrics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Equivalence (formal languages)","score_opus":0.4223242593578988,"score_gpt":0.45951297667675856,"score_spread":0.037188717318859754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252793816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85143316,0.0012753597,0.07399873,0.0046946597,0.00028949423,0.00022837259,0.00045564168,0.00016185133,0.067462794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864763,0.00022907575,0.011166561,0.0010433368,0.00011376946,0.00008757874,0.00034493316,0.000068742986,0.00046976676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9648809,0.018226849,0.001962968,0.00453332,0.0096327625,0.0007631378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76968956,0.18663654,0.013411735,0.022057641,0.006580803,0.0016237944],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030954197,0.0008665361,0.0009201523,0.0021595643,0.0013926405,0.0045585213,0.001821712,0.0023608778,0.007713674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2568057,0.00096977735,0.0011210777,0.0013721772,0.0061121467,0.012418053,0.007219457,0.0048021786,0.000513128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047462108,0.0010425724,0.14692126,0.0024024074,0.0016865858,0.002634376,0.07049426,0.0056114886,0.037562013,0.43179217,0.0072971247,0.28780958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003775107,0.00031454727,0.1029182,0.00035865963,0.00056408264,0.0011811096,0.008483966,0.0098736575,0.009034322,0.8583138,0.008369017,0.00021118652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010494556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009921319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9690458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010601585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008358104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16370338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253273833","doi":"10.24124/2010/bpgub639","title":"Can the magnitude of the belief-bias in causal reasoning be attenuated through the manipulation of content?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Psychology; Causal model; Causal reasoning; Social psychology; Health belief model; Confirmation bias; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Mathematics; Statistics; Medicine; Public health; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.2924260782582968,"score_gpt":0.41928156086085894,"score_spread":0.12685548260256213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253273833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94371146,0.00074679236,0.036395013,0.0020902385,0.00012094055,0.0003554068,0.00009642645,0.00011493265,0.016368736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973839,0.0004945543,0.023675255,0.0006226143,0.000073665986,0.00033499853,0.00006753359,0.00005468839,0.00083767774],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956393,0.0024270387,0.00020098811,0.00048862264,0.0010728934,0.00017104032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.908804,0.07532133,0.007611045,0.0059261117,0.0017822521,0.00055524905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010481131,0.0004606125,0.0005795084,0.0006069376,0.0002497561,0.0013176906,0.00076956244,0.0009526967,0.004048389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09368083,0.0005304696,0.00045312528,0.0003769955,0.002583359,0.0030634545,0.00086528854,0.001357446,0.00038896018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016012412,0.008385312,0.10769088,0.0037100534,0.001198603,0.00046981857,0.009993761,0.0032103853,0.33402416,0.09177274,0.0013248802,0.422207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003536432,0.011472296,0.5929882,0.0009548235,0.0019792686,0.0011735068,0.0024279873,0.02067796,0.13784339,0.2160196,0.010665208,0.00026132364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005367098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046049306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010481131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005652323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057578745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055430174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253476940","doi":"10.32920/14668917","title":"The Effect of Time Pressure on Risky Financial Decisions from Description and Decisions from Experience","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Risk-seeking; Economics; Actuarial science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09418522141655992,"score_gpt":0.372694988609122,"score_spread":0.27850976719256204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253476940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948026,0.00014673022,0.00069322606,0.00007799876,0.000025025778,0.00003152006,0.00006796267,0.000009133012,0.004145789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99629885,0.00016543435,0.0017921998,0.00008981096,0.000035296514,0.00011490556,0.00012517556,0.000019863284,0.0013584238],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975817,0.0011105529,0.00016877889,0.00025734233,0.00067794276,0.00020367243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95459676,0.03524829,0.004170511,0.0020146272,0.0007439551,0.0032257636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002697913,0.00052872096,0.0005272821,0.00036211335,0.00037109046,0.0018120877,0.00041074087,0.00079370494,0.009759251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026617518,0.00028618154,0.00042206445,0.00032682906,0.000755851,0.0011127695,0.0011422988,0.0014408544,0.00043463527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07792167,0.03333662,0.2788628,0.0022737584,0.0013389912,0.0021359383,0.008003061,0.014408388,0.2833265,0.013951844,0.0025086724,0.28193164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017456401,0.030614601,0.89029396,0.00024498225,0.00055564725,0.00080240075,0.002213582,0.014801103,0.031307373,0.021068648,0.0060017086,0.0003502502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047712697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051269046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009759251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003509615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038191382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032647908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253539784","doi":"10.32920/14638635","title":"Decisions from experience: adaptive information search and choice in younger and older adults","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Cognition; Psychology; Neuropsychology; Valence (chemistry); Affect (linguistics); Cognitive psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.14043805600269083,"score_gpt":0.40797124856968847,"score_spread":0.26753319256699765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253539784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995247,0.000099238474,0.000045590637,0.0000235094,0.000002328725,0.0000042049014,0.000032256878,7.804582e-7,0.0002674282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990834,0.00010451168,0.00014180064,0.00006291159,0.000008022482,0.000008151849,0.000068883535,0.0000014008473,0.0005209045],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971324,0.00004432588,0.00004162451,0.00008895228,0.00007062548,0.00004121386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847883,0.00045301436,0.00043533134,0.000108549546,0.00012327755,0.0004009988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012708592,0.00032243712,0.00049251626,0.0005497372,0.00037470023,0.0011271273,0.00016797853,0.000697115,0.0024338216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050106836,0.0002430328,0.00023342835,0.0002643666,0.0006097392,0.0013096618,0.0007211338,0.000568103,0.0003532097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027005428,0.0016750726,0.93553245,0.00010096327,0.00008180396,0.0004975746,0.014680364,0.0003297618,0.008958398,0.0005888203,0.00047743935,0.0343768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046306468,0.0008907281,0.99324954,0.0000121476705,0.000024600735,0.00040782546,0.0023711445,0.0005801393,0.00064154353,0.001186966,0.0005649326,0.000024126246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028583019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033057057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028583019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021200418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019194964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008141875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254003416","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_103425","title":"Rational Behavior","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.21160128680386206,"score_gpt":0.40237257812064636,"score_spread":0.1907712913167843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254003416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017140813,0.0019435416,0.019683275,0.0047544036,0.0002822197,0.00003345198,0.00007496479,0.00005493912,0.97145915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14018399,0.0055173654,0.013682556,0.002857209,0.00064464536,0.00022040897,0.00025772868,0.00012784486,0.8365081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995315,0.00015049339,0.000014021381,0.000087522305,0.0001768166,0.000039608287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999703,0.00012989657,0.000019708383,0.00006939984,0.000055314234,0.000022725653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006107282,0.0006797169,0.0003598709,0.0005112355,0.00071760395,0.0026183508,0.00050255173,0.0014381649,0.032987192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015365998,0.00020612136,0.00024046144,0.00044546952,0.0029991244,0.0024586818,0.00084396865,0.0018409156,0.009072991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024036156,0.000008210873,0.000032154778,0.000020799369,0.0000026894763,0.000007186993,0.00009843669,0.00021596687,0.00006398029,0.97000194,0.014011774,0.01553448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036666718,0.000003633159,0.00007921096,0.00004390594,0.0000024005697,0.00002049993,0.000050106686,0.00049551844,0.000096852964,0.8636863,0.13551483,0.0000030772676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012078793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014411955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032987192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016602388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010929737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11035317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255226570","doi":"10.1167/14.10.1029","title":"Probability Cues Enhance Perceptual Estimations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Cued speech; Kurtosis; Perception; Probability distribution; Psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13127397038766372,"score_gpt":0.4414980236351232,"score_spread":0.3102240532474595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255226570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9209393,0.0011842704,0.064427674,0.0002923472,0.00016894507,0.000107804524,0.00029033283,0.0009528567,0.0116365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98050815,0.00036615206,0.017140813,0.000116903735,0.0000617239,0.00002733275,0.0002251836,0.00028378976,0.0012701264],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783784,0.00026845335,0.00019382346,0.0005607607,0.00092005846,0.00021905593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820393,0.010430614,0.0027193758,0.0024679832,0.001745372,0.000597322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014223665,0.00087013363,0.00072438136,0.0009909063,0.00038137042,0.0021650984,0.0006741883,0.0012717764,0.005684915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03617873,0.00083343114,0.00052077434,0.00045643878,0.0006065166,0.0037831024,0.0035168582,0.001407343,0.00094024884],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035274317,0.00029211142,0.026193539,0.0008211605,0.00016306572,0.00036103954,0.0010480385,0.009374026,0.7395984,0.004500322,0.001527611,0.21259317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023830497,0.0026179808,0.60469395,0.00030120148,0.0005629034,0.0012953558,0.000619073,0.08949215,0.27100176,0.019015273,0.009713741,0.00044828161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001493209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011145422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005684915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052672304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051085476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019017935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256517360","doi":"10.4309/jgi.2009.23.10","title":"Neuroeconomics: A Guide to the New Science of Making Choices","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Gambling Issues","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroeconomics; Psychology; Humanities; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2841576854003311,"score_gpt":0.5093635788632356,"score_spread":0.22520589346290448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256517360","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013671784,0.17473564,0.59482986,0.08850228,0.0062489826,0.00022028662,0.001568025,0.0013593376,0.13116853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05162729,0.20631325,0.5955938,0.028903281,0.010066377,0.0012817938,0.0011505792,0.0011395961,0.10392412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987232,0.000629163,0.00011650238,0.000089176094,0.00039523622,0.00004654683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99455947,0.0040769675,0.0001680424,0.0002872596,0.00068697665,0.00022139373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004213917,0.0019668993,0.001981615,0.0027190724,0.00073599815,0.006089242,0.0024996235,0.0042103725,0.015526829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010240498,0.00096714206,0.0009760946,0.0030093517,0.0060924753,0.007960055,0.0017571201,0.009460429,0.007964432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001667531,0.000061743944,0.00022600252,0.000397448,0.000038739287,0.000085992535,0.00030757365,0.003391768,0.00024465637,0.78097844,0.14817962,0.066071324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000100292855,0.0000092903565,0.00014153348,0.00025909123,0.00000758884,0.00009048982,0.00009466716,0.0028491868,0.00006305398,0.78858024,0.20787458,0.000020272006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004538563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00840429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015526829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020714998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004682269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051942408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280552674","doi":"10.1287/mksc.2022.1364","title":"The Importance of Selling Formats: When Integrating Purchase and Quantity Decisions Increases Sales","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marketing Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Marketing; Sales management; Advertising","score_opus":0.09148159845372901,"score_gpt":0.3746963510346606,"score_spread":0.2832147525809316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280552674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93877405,0.0008431036,0.011133771,0.0013276783,0.00031215264,0.000407137,0.00024595065,0.00015070062,0.046805497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98544794,0.00031252662,0.010888473,0.00033379896,0.00022395952,0.00009655021,0.00018253976,0.00009966151,0.002414551],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590635,0.0016067104,0.00035851542,0.0005952397,0.0012547559,0.0002783186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9265757,0.05735748,0.006656187,0.0035824678,0.0031400623,0.0026880773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060232566,0.0006141894,0.0006689538,0.0009158489,0.0007411805,0.0055093654,0.0008428294,0.0015650623,0.015692635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067147106,0.0004858104,0.00059607334,0.0009522044,0.00093875214,0.007360569,0.001521941,0.001649213,0.0016777895],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017983058,0.012589426,0.4256042,0.0017014918,0.0005595143,0.0008890582,0.0016924,0.009444123,0.07767692,0.02017563,0.0038608436,0.4278234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011414897,0.011440382,0.8096718,0.0005718718,0.0013773288,0.0015964042,0.002585948,0.05555698,0.03421074,0.066956475,0.014610091,0.00028043552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007797486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013291035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015692635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008582825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009718936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05249703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281766773","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.05.014","title":"Decision-making in uncertain contexts: The role of autonomic markers in resolving indecision","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Impulsivity; Skin conductance; Context (archaeology); Moderation; Deliberation; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.03541866394613039,"score_gpt":0.3982517453826542,"score_spread":0.36283308143652376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281766773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98282593,0.001034187,0.008823964,0.0005439276,0.00009293447,0.00004221175,0.000075221455,0.000017287954,0.0065444126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972409,0.000254648,0.002109471,0.00008339556,0.000035008976,0.000012565775,0.000029136056,0.0000075079197,0.00022739741],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919146,0.00030525576,0.00005108838,0.00017053318,0.00017579504,0.00010582892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943084,0.0031684537,0.001334166,0.00038266243,0.00030214977,0.0005041414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022157223,0.0004001538,0.0005253449,0.00038756276,0.00042524666,0.0036825847,0.00041192782,0.0009849581,0.0014956539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018298913,0.00029758457,0.00021903966,0.0003353922,0.00064211065,0.0016378212,0.001103084,0.0017101452,0.00012169682],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0070817145,0.0030854172,0.42429656,0.0010872514,0.0014708778,0.002003625,0.008493722,0.046295166,0.15920897,0.041194882,0.0019296496,0.3038521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013168232,0.0014716313,0.82931507,0.0003249388,0.00025997448,0.0004965792,0.0024097988,0.07542129,0.009560302,0.07804528,0.002387672,0.00017584849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008789691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006783828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036825847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029603302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061448105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011718035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281900369","doi":"10.1111/cjag.12308","title":"A portion cap rule with two products: An experimental evaluation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture","keywords":"Intuition; Valuation (finance); Microeconomics; Business; Economics; Marketing; Psychology","score_opus":0.11726685266222571,"score_gpt":0.29174773731671455,"score_spread":0.17448088465448885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281900369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97959983,0.00057065126,0.0062516634,0.0004536596,0.00047728105,0.0029989802,0.00057028135,0.00009962243,0.008978092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733623,0.000539514,0.0134579595,0.0006703439,0.00028262005,0.004922123,0.00063785596,0.00005645666,0.00607081],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955161,0.0023922375,0.00034889902,0.00056690746,0.0009095128,0.00026633157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91172576,0.075354114,0.0037762772,0.005474469,0.0022713786,0.0013979865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010389555,0.0014007257,0.0013975925,0.00061195093,0.00089795695,0.0016610846,0.0020858045,0.003076143,0.015382478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03881957,0.00055739825,0.0014392718,0.0004866173,0.0023037624,0.0020905542,0.0012203436,0.0028357785,0.0017200763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.31730023,0.42418113,0.01056701,0.007102565,0.0019533413,0.0007935859,0.0018629265,0.028958889,0.03432937,0.024805533,0.009593713,0.13855167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.11911226,0.6645951,0.02160878,0.000810965,0.0036422464,0.0004613784,0.0018891762,0.09534502,0.031073594,0.03771739,0.023248592,0.0004954057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010657264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008869675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015382478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000978338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009068634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054945886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281969102","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x22001157","title":"Conviction Narrative Theory: A theory of choice under radical uncertainty","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Aarhus Universitets Forskningsfond; University of Cambridge; UK Research and Innovation; Aarhus Universitet","keywords":"Narrative; Conviction; Psychology; Futures contract; Cognition; Mental representation; Vocabulary; Cognitive psychology; Deliberation; Epistemology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Economics","score_opus":0.1813556990338463,"score_gpt":0.4260144985023377,"score_spread":0.2446587994684914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281969102","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09033262,0.0028401536,0.6241002,0.027806252,0.00040898367,0.0002668748,0.00044545144,0.00009797147,0.25370163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94015384,0.00097650057,0.05127161,0.0008659702,0.0001858806,0.0002343905,0.00017502997,0.00002973619,0.0061071194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677104,0.0019692278,0.00013456645,0.00027719256,0.00066300324,0.0001849867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98716867,0.009353431,0.0011540375,0.0006058107,0.00109115,0.00062682875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051832763,0.0005185429,0.0004975577,0.0016328441,0.0014428584,0.0051013646,0.0016553324,0.0019152235,0.0069979182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015387194,0.00031121343,0.0011645305,0.0014650548,0.00892768,0.0073394594,0.0020165413,0.0025491975,0.00045284393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075721337,0.00000950835,0.00020161307,0.000022096216,0.0000055641895,0.000038266357,0.0005441454,0.0016884351,0.000021720933,0.9951073,0.00042206005,0.0019317919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000854436,0.0000068148215,0.00012446236,0.000028919425,0.000004134664,0.000030120007,0.00024490443,0.007246289,0.000025151186,0.9897866,0.002488743,0.0000052223704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023433063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016494611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069979182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035486931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022190455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027412117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283361691","doi":"10.1177/00222437221112312","title":"“It Could Be Better” Can Make It Worse: When and Why People Mistakenly Communicate Upward Counterfactual Information","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Real estate; Ideal (ethics); Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2675501825770345,"score_gpt":0.45028033585034966,"score_spread":0.18273015327331515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283361691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8292622,0.009211418,0.027140768,0.039234668,0.0008809443,0.00012310238,0.0002285172,0.00014338957,0.09377508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923476,0.0010111494,0.0021267128,0.0027184356,0.000121284065,0.000028679178,0.00005699566,0.00004124665,0.0015479241],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98535997,0.010113181,0.0007123329,0.0012503406,0.001986969,0.0005771201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9357588,0.044999123,0.008979685,0.0054090405,0.004215945,0.00063740456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014920886,0.0006430727,0.00040047267,0.0013588493,0.0032471113,0.0068081343,0.001348194,0.004448031,0.0064792107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08448387,0.0007567216,0.00072586193,0.00086035614,0.010482189,0.015079672,0.0034364183,0.0043210657,0.0008320651],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009864839,0.0002649536,0.11613553,0.0011363524,0.0005435691,0.004897154,0.56347364,0.0008184294,0.00402687,0.16338627,0.015598867,0.12873182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031911428,0.00050141115,0.12813331,0.0024052889,0.001052108,0.010352888,0.4402348,0.009170657,0.008009747,0.24451038,0.1546089,0.0007014518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007826309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006106015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014920886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026476246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012696161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07891017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283689970","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2022.898027","title":"Artificial Intelligence Can’t Be Charmed: The Effects of Impartiality on Laypeople’s Algorithmic Preferences","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Psychology; Social psychology; Preference; Political science; Law; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.13425104857261405,"score_gpt":0.4257887007390891,"score_spread":0.29153765216647504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283689970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96330804,0.00047003673,0.0047070314,0.003934215,0.000053713393,0.000020039748,0.00003313241,0.00001268199,0.027460964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983413,0.00009847622,0.0007078087,0.00045411458,0.0000142546005,0.000011515261,0.000012061802,0.0000064871697,0.00035392106],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950411,0.00369248,0.0001341488,0.00040945294,0.0004884709,0.00023434126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9556732,0.03197368,0.0062235002,0.0030811266,0.0016190689,0.0014294053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009053275,0.00029518947,0.00030737947,0.00050877564,0.0011160313,0.0027563272,0.00035436827,0.0010581525,0.0059661707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053521786,0.00017553724,0.00039358044,0.00039503234,0.0036096554,0.0019633614,0.001452353,0.0019591416,0.0004480283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0070932135,0.001596856,0.46125558,0.00095398066,0.0010580312,0.0018104356,0.068267934,0.011411609,0.020572474,0.13357343,0.008376308,0.2840301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044529515,0.0014033485,0.62599105,0.0006087926,0.00033846975,0.0009484345,0.052302256,0.016256995,0.006144162,0.2674198,0.027844401,0.0002970036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016352362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014403262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009053275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007920212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044065938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04787886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283827058","doi":"10.1007/s11409-022-09313-y","title":"How accurate and predictive are judgments of solvability? Explorations in a two-phase anagram solving paradigm","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College","funders":"Flinders University; Australian Government","keywords":"Anagrams; Anagram; Psychology; Task (project management); Set (abstract data type); Duration (music); Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.15767976839915737,"score_gpt":0.41044014986003546,"score_spread":0.2527603814608781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283827058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938174,0.000028395187,0.0048381602,0.000069179754,0.000010977974,0.00009477953,0.00006956155,0.00004556953,0.0010259845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895488,0.000037667032,0.009190711,0.00006571322,0.000013182145,0.00025303446,0.000116456074,0.000028366945,0.00074603636],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979583,0.00077621394,0.00016845402,0.0005093886,0.0004753497,0.00011218985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819857,0.010177434,0.004814463,0.0015507616,0.0006325855,0.00083897164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029388836,0.0006976913,0.0005842861,0.0005225602,0.00029286896,0.0012957786,0.0007094942,0.0010573725,0.002953934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022931747,0.00056130294,0.0003276296,0.00029720747,0.00053297554,0.0017247102,0.0011177314,0.0014299415,0.00027053666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011762996,0.008682403,0.07964671,0.0006769947,0.000263811,0.00030974258,0.005831725,0.008363911,0.7920304,0.0046212245,0.0011374603,0.08667262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015230506,0.01960995,0.65164685,0.00023008884,0.00028247052,0.0006210225,0.0018021762,0.16339509,0.12197631,0.03434955,0.0041239387,0.00043958036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056042866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008285879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002953934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034242676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046598885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015542448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284890194","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v15i1.617","title":"The Case of Stated Preferences and Social Well-Being Indices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Deliberation; Happiness; Paternalism; Positive economics; Politics; Preference; Social choice theory; Order (exchange); Social preferences; Public economics; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.1124874216597746,"score_gpt":0.3654072601664208,"score_spread":0.2529198385066462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284890194","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09430187,0.0016125981,0.75279444,0.025686216,0.00048201077,0.0003894616,0.0007594843,0.0001325931,0.12384136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8016799,0.0006342991,0.19023986,0.0016701949,0.00037932195,0.00096027605,0.00024280701,0.00007092065,0.004122418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9154978,0.067978136,0.0023603092,0.0049552754,0.0072014784,0.0020070828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82483506,0.13742457,0.012574184,0.016672116,0.006872326,0.0016217075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05657737,0.0012675854,0.0018131688,0.0026965751,0.0028120927,0.009337188,0.0021268213,0.004507458,0.0097476095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17527713,0.0007350571,0.0017955689,0.0055241096,0.01242186,0.017279314,0.0063794767,0.008544019,0.0008217268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007667152,0.000037550686,0.0020623219,0.0000926773,0.00006758299,0.000104074956,0.0013534315,0.003075051,0.00008386105,0.97535455,0.0007858286,0.016906347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021082566,0.000030819454,0.00066950585,0.00005419903,0.000018357508,0.00006736435,0.00045333273,0.011703236,0.00012988312,0.98345196,0.0033773321,0.000022858643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025160294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017572966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05657737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035946271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019087982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2992133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285008158","doi":"10.1038/s41562-022-01392-w","title":"The globalizability of temporal discounting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Human Behaviour","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; York University; McGill University","funders":"Medical Research Council; University of Cambridge; UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Discounting; Psychology; Econometrics; Economics","score_opus":0.06845175588635537,"score_gpt":0.4238273547491535,"score_spread":0.3553755988627981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285008158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722911,0.0006150344,0.01393238,0.00040501807,0.000043210537,0.000030314572,0.0003821652,0.00002450904,0.012276167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988206,0.00010958885,0.00072420755,0.000027709246,0.000011320185,0.000006422958,0.00009200547,0.000008185004,0.00019995935],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987264,0.00045814915,0.00010971258,0.00042269757,0.0002153717,0.00006757835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97084796,0.015523946,0.0065435087,0.0053289216,0.0012785898,0.0004769952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005302994,0.00025891597,0.00035279783,0.0005613375,0.00021729173,0.0014586576,0.00041929525,0.0002481823,0.004379961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03545694,0.00019160369,0.0004472747,0.0007466143,0.001268565,0.0016303912,0.0010236684,0.0011799391,0.00014045279],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016511247,0.00008608075,0.8509429,0.00027805023,0.0009018643,0.00020040083,0.003214749,0.006015506,0.00623564,0.026837112,0.00066737813,0.10296924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044176686,0.0002892469,0.9195367,0.00009038993,0.0002983455,0.00036499993,0.0014173263,0.011858564,0.0027473175,0.06080345,0.0024801255,0.00006927483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038550887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00306958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005302994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041565977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023222296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028045237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285021069","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4088821","title":"Ups and Downs: How to Shape an Audience's Sentiment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Advertising; Sentiment analysis; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.059027629802241896,"score_gpt":0.3580510354677922,"score_spread":0.2990234056655503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285021069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53200376,0.00083445234,0.016168993,0.021794785,0.0014651424,0.000104412386,0.00032155268,0.00023743896,0.42706954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98743445,0.00016245963,0.001255237,0.0012138239,0.0003269261,0.00002815371,0.000048726222,0.00011164005,0.0094186105],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988305,0.00056278775,0.000035426685,0.0001424194,0.00026377835,0.00016502767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99595356,0.002159507,0.0004003206,0.00016198914,0.0007045233,0.0006201162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00204349,0.00032939913,0.00033059588,0.0005396936,0.0010066403,0.0047230003,0.000400167,0.0017935042,0.020883787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014905348,0.00023097158,0.00027456722,0.00035844877,0.001074296,0.0040107924,0.0015631856,0.001804748,0.0035978053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029364463,0.00086694304,0.10539197,0.0009828457,0.00033097714,0.0017013659,0.03805831,0.006618375,0.06584629,0.28841567,0.12575875,0.3630921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004876307,0.0012964363,0.17023991,0.0005949139,0.0006107548,0.0007369091,0.06189545,0.058752246,0.014620914,0.43666986,0.2537691,0.00032587413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008207306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001023486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020883787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081497483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032875725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06986326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285086941","doi":"10.26509/frbc-wp-202128r","title":"Communicating Data Uncertainty: Multi-Wave Experimental Evidence for UK GDP","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"Working paper","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"Warwick Business School, University of Warwick; University of Warwick","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Point estimation; Measurement uncertainty; Econometrics; Qualitative property; Control (management); Point (geometry); Statistics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.8489929296110112,"score_gpt":0.5691288876152597,"score_spread":0.27986404199575154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285086941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9612302,0.0006246638,0.006618091,0.005663264,0.00033302326,0.0013440929,0.0016435786,0.00007420949,0.022468919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893646,0.00031440015,0.0031601666,0.0014662137,0.00011666191,0.002008709,0.0006673791,0.000035149063,0.0028666542],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.93443054,0.054981966,0.0022055448,0.002607533,0.0045249793,0.0012493541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3824627,0.5342032,0.04296487,0.02926297,0.00922077,0.0018855522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046798714,0.00056416093,0.0007803526,0.00074138684,0.0016325503,0.0031689315,0.001148512,0.0030701654,0.018042244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31168684,0.0006271964,0.00070760964,0.0012406328,0.0039458717,0.004474852,0.0037970613,0.0027301735,0.0018654099],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.1518417,0.038470183,0.22035608,0.009214367,0.0037171687,0.001548282,0.09077767,0.010717002,0.012265927,0.085053034,0.078099005,0.29793957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.038385168,0.06104969,0.5601045,0.00511835,0.004203462,0.0008071489,0.050396696,0.027134806,0.022592839,0.11213426,0.116668396,0.0014047305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011070667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006543861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046798714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032014803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018785882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24749827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285218571","doi":"10.3982/ecta18137","title":"Randomize at Your Own Risk: On the Observability of Ambiguity Aversion","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econometrica","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Erasmus Research Institute of Management; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam","keywords":"Ambiguity; Ambiguity aversion; Observability; Incentive; Risk aversion (psychology); Econometrics; Isolation (microbiology); Incentive compatibility; Economics; Hedge; Expected utility hypothesis; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.28636243543570555,"score_gpt":0.3775546163438651,"score_spread":0.09119218090815956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285218571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9256254,0.00032063748,0.063498914,0.001203923,0.000021496558,0.00007376266,0.000036286256,0.00004245037,0.009177049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944999,0.00011388086,0.0047685164,0.00019527183,0.000019360195,0.000037208196,0.000011658662,0.0000096070435,0.0003444599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954704,0.0028310453,0.00018112693,0.0006618634,0.00059830886,0.0002572848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9336927,0.049987677,0.0062114997,0.00855001,0.00060460647,0.00095352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013313217,0.0004052727,0.000872225,0.00046446512,0.00038110785,0.0015849182,0.00048700403,0.00071625627,0.0031632083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051035523,0.00032293735,0.0006450099,0.00029054147,0.0034174724,0.002316208,0.0017225549,0.001964406,0.00017889198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009511449,0.0022729398,0.16536786,0.00061887666,0.0015445197,0.0010056191,0.005471141,0.062276457,0.052104056,0.466571,0.0018234624,0.23143262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009108108,0.002431486,0.12381762,0.00019534044,0.00043458564,0.00083696475,0.0011507004,0.15199517,0.013797689,0.70072263,0.0034842019,0.00022273586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042314295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029180458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013313217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038580163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033910695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07040787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285222328","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-55065-7_1526","title":"Stochastic Distributions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.19191756333767215,"score_gpt":0.3922298651262077,"score_spread":0.20031230178853557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285222328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034615619,0.004289314,0.3478435,0.0028624798,0.00078444555,0.000042892974,0.00059529336,0.0004034708,0.63971704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15837376,0.009622812,0.05568472,0.0014540658,0.0016122233,0.00020367422,0.0012570948,0.0005619492,0.7712297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996393,0.00009031779,0.00001279367,0.000070610346,0.00016440572,0.000022644204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952567,0.00024594998,0.000023177654,0.00008217138,0.000096914286,0.000026131684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045571514,0.000739314,0.0005681187,0.00091388193,0.0005373532,0.0018730093,0.0005488354,0.00091079855,0.03681034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021294644,0.00031485793,0.0004079274,0.0010691106,0.0011916335,0.0019653179,0.0008603796,0.0018484524,0.010349547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029629568,0.000008816556,0.000043601165,0.000024838979,0.0000043547993,0.000018611823,0.0000373395,0.0022330845,0.0001902999,0.9514431,0.019196112,0.026796836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025528218,0.000005078326,0.000109954046,0.000024963902,0.0000032716575,0.00008515791,0.000017865037,0.007923697,0.00021944521,0.8769547,0.11464722,0.000006126506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010412169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088584924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03681034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010539558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059892045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12314284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285260216","doi":"10.55365/1923.x2022.20.2","title":"Teaching1 Economics Students about Different Models for Dealing with Uncertainty and Risk Besides the Standard Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the Subjective Expected Utility (SEU) Model","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics and Finance","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capital asset pricing model; Economics; Cumulative prospect theory; Prospect theory; Asset (computer security); Actuarial science; Behavioral economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Gold standard (test); Risk-seeking; Expected utility hypothesis; Financial economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.06501563034508676,"score_gpt":0.3406378903042606,"score_spread":0.2756222599591739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285260216","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029696548,0.04486426,0.50372535,0.23268662,0.0054697683,0.0001313861,0.00075664464,0.00047915842,0.18219024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45910838,0.17127348,0.20739384,0.04800396,0.010983568,0.00038152814,0.00094517326,0.00029846356,0.10161171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993493,0.0002505551,0.00004220451,0.0000834665,0.00021505455,0.00005947217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947754,0.0040135197,0.00029858618,0.00021219501,0.0004602927,0.00024004612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029859745,0.001015358,0.00078337715,0.00078383833,0.0005235533,0.0026044026,0.0011899055,0.0023947558,0.0086632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008029563,0.00032525996,0.0010189833,0.0011855294,0.0018616094,0.0049200775,0.0008042338,0.0062086694,0.0028837179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005932429,0.0002987433,0.0038141874,0.00071884855,0.000096988944,0.00027943047,0.00049484626,0.026229056,0.0006126263,0.73920685,0.09517247,0.13301668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002199833,0.00005503746,0.0014151785,0.00040720872,0.000020689538,0.0002526246,0.00027292708,0.021786753,0.00033723377,0.86875266,0.10664224,0.000035544617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019333056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014788912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0086632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020133876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013168055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028981328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285298482","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdac023","title":"Measuring Belief-dependent Preferences without Data on Beliefs","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economics; Econometrics; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.5461250964114086,"score_gpt":0.4749042238464929,"score_spread":0.07122087256491572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285298482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5002227,0.0016318547,0.48439398,0.00065530755,0.000058636637,0.00031753338,0.0013994579,0.00013322665,0.011187486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702397,0.000383469,0.027989559,0.00010738948,0.000027958517,0.0002452814,0.0004914436,0.000019527573,0.0004957271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.942929,0.04225984,0.0024508568,0.0055583087,0.0057275584,0.0010744268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3447094,0.57483727,0.030175049,0.04195804,0.0074102515,0.0009099896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.062430922,0.0012226775,0.0022641507,0.002075568,0.00046775944,0.0026667172,0.0024834436,0.002267868,0.004530552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32244742,0.0010153697,0.002053768,0.0017957772,0.0039334134,0.004876549,0.0026549818,0.0037641241,0.0006415515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038811686,0.0016910015,0.16390848,0.0036293233,0.004234446,0.0006474193,0.003646608,0.19447394,0.012028621,0.46912506,0.0014344344,0.1412996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023883948,0.0016473983,0.15079279,0.0007159218,0.0010241023,0.0004358578,0.00084737665,0.31337667,0.014779791,0.51168025,0.0041198963,0.00034103275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016853389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009072358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062430922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015292007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081038923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3301702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286539857","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4158050","title":"Goal-Based Categorization: Dynamic Classification in the Display Advertising Industry","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Advertising; Display advertising; Business; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Online advertising; World Wide Web; The Internet","score_opus":0.048524539592846166,"score_gpt":0.36545674541670004,"score_spread":0.31693220582385384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286539857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8780695,0.0006853274,0.09596161,0.0028483847,0.00010392098,0.00018690334,0.0004215175,0.00026686967,0.021455951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98663783,0.000111645975,0.0103675565,0.000104410254,0.000026727097,0.00004208116,0.00023579576,0.000037474336,0.002436542],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968353,0.001561619,0.00011268443,0.00062626315,0.0004307412,0.00043339748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840735,0.01034425,0.0013690874,0.0017947305,0.0015009327,0.0009174011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060872226,0.00046849437,0.0010424848,0.0021012323,0.0012363225,0.005483353,0.001740205,0.0018887124,0.0064952075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025921881,0.00035492933,0.0010067443,0.0018861217,0.0013710133,0.0053542173,0.001931949,0.0021437798,0.001035001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025382203,0.0028719455,0.17212427,0.00036609272,0.00036548747,0.0004370597,0.004289462,0.05233913,0.007891041,0.2908604,0.016381996,0.44953486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009844587,0.00017091352,0.051481225,0.000060514496,0.000065545944,0.00015516714,0.0018314971,0.5398331,0.0012858658,0.40201312,0.0029200984,0.000084530664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007963871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053595887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007963871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026220656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013037564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032192707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287778702","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2005.06673","title":"Comparison of Information Structures for Zero-Sum Games and a Partial\\n Converse to Blackwell Ordering in Standard Borel Spaces","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Converse; Mathematics; Corollary; Generalization; Characterization (materials science); Zero-sum game; Zero (linguistics); Mathematical economics; Space (punctuation); Discrete mathematics; Variable (mathematics); State space; Combinatorics; Game theory; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Statistics","score_opus":0.18032083885102967,"score_gpt":0.312557684023508,"score_spread":0.1322368451724783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287778702","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2603442,0.0010345497,0.64844316,0.0035497812,0.00021958636,0.00017135924,0.0005957335,0.00032434866,0.08531728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92048305,0.00076133676,0.069133066,0.0006974629,0.00018541071,0.00015645029,0.0003311238,0.00007744142,0.008174579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99448687,0.0022436948,0.00039372267,0.00063681905,0.0014717485,0.0007672206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860742,0.009068884,0.0012400034,0.0012348852,0.0014897148,0.00089227204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052491515,0.0008032136,0.0009543293,0.0015071407,0.0014326975,0.0049429405,0.0013694473,0.00206218,0.0045947554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015197303,0.0006185265,0.0012438413,0.0012426481,0.0047769654,0.0079502,0.0025826073,0.0032742787,0.00072132424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003621205,0.00002157564,0.00014378253,0.00004014399,0.0000065630516,0.000033843786,0.00018796916,0.0039337995,0.000615006,0.99074906,0.00033295585,0.0038990465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021917293,0.000071020564,0.00022190785,0.000032638298,0.000010375988,0.000062287465,0.00013390831,0.029770467,0.0012395234,0.96661055,0.001795796,0.00002960939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016102485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012375908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052491515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026792996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002214526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027760506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288942881","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4176907","title":"Semantics Meets Attractiveness: Choice by Salience","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Transitive relation; Attractiveness; Salient; Computer science; Social psychology; Theoretical computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.05931326050342803,"score_gpt":0.37347892585598347,"score_spread":0.3141656653525554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288942881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71937466,0.0011926602,0.098267145,0.009788813,0.00024780733,0.000112579066,0.00017066098,0.000107294894,0.17073826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993461,0.00013968711,0.0045570377,0.00015964518,0.000076201795,0.000015576528,0.000024342831,0.000028013672,0.0015384682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781823,0.0010761246,0.00007289006,0.00031757652,0.000534362,0.00018084113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891713,0.0075964425,0.0008268331,0.00073964737,0.00070988137,0.0009558923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002701248,0.000342824,0.00076796685,0.0009609226,0.00084132334,0.0049702358,0.00048942375,0.0018520197,0.01564707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023786653,0.00045867436,0.00056034024,0.000681463,0.0036393947,0.008690434,0.0020617102,0.0017941582,0.00084091857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080147857,0.00027654224,0.010310969,0.0002689809,0.00008798469,0.0003637545,0.0011925504,0.002978996,0.00643406,0.9156138,0.0031057377,0.058565114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006317523,0.000105305255,0.0045814356,0.000017636175,0.000030450152,0.00017274958,0.0004867271,0.0073348773,0.0006253233,0.9847052,0.0018541644,0.000022982043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005551174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006659295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01564707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000776438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074757583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05234468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289947959","doi":"10.1186/s12889-022-13928-w","title":"Estimating the lagged effect of price discounting: a time-series study on sugar sweetened beverage purchasing in a supermarket","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Public Health","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Institut de Valorisation des Données","keywords":"Discounting; Purchasing; Delay discounting; Sugar; Economics; Econometrics; Medicine; Food science; Operations management","score_opus":0.1034258994670752,"score_gpt":0.39968536321195935,"score_spread":0.29625946374488416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289947959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976119,0.00016585899,0.0014005549,0.00011819656,0.000010392805,0.000024829393,0.00040405086,0.0000072684074,0.00025709107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99811697,0.00008576736,0.00065529393,0.000032815515,0.000010976107,0.000017125603,0.0007498927,0.000003537912,0.00032762586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907136,0.00036937988,0.000052987252,0.0002497715,0.000115105395,0.00014135486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882211,0.0066402983,0.0029624498,0.0007719902,0.0006996137,0.00070443645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005194415,0.00042304973,0.0004768705,0.0007373435,0.0005102348,0.0011385113,0.0011048475,0.00072464236,0.0027739014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014185309,0.0003458066,0.0010515227,0.0013666878,0.00049035094,0.0008033025,0.0005652552,0.0013332735,0.00023100505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023777258,0.00018995156,0.9896243,0.000028508406,0.00033539525,0.0001645905,0.00034984504,0.004588253,0.00023731202,0.00038956152,0.0002795816,0.0035749231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022005155,0.00023675422,0.95175457,0.00002624731,0.00021421092,0.000055766224,0.0005835359,0.045951243,0.00013060041,0.00036125127,0.00064343825,0.00002035552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25074255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2191091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25074255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018879663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018626757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49856615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290375586","doi":"10.1111/fire.12315","title":"Risk‐taking begets risk‐taking: Evidence from casino openings and investor portfolios","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Financial Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio; Spillover effect; Systematic risk; Monetary economics; Business; Economics; Affect (linguistics); Financial economics; Microeconomics; Psychology","score_opus":0.20269503028748848,"score_gpt":0.4132033250902302,"score_spread":0.21050829480274175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290375586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936552,0.0023130188,0.00020814092,0.00027839903,0.000011093562,0.000014888154,0.0000809561,0.0000045963543,0.0034336378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801034,0.0013099469,0.00011200584,0.00009769537,0.000024455074,0.000009227422,0.00004519411,0.0000012359442,0.00038988513],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851114,0.00090418407,0.00005579275,0.00021895804,0.00021487194,0.000094995135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9681625,0.01941368,0.00904465,0.0011207282,0.0005632686,0.0016952954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030953384,0.00023390287,0.0005909387,0.00046029143,0.0003913631,0.0012218568,0.0003147235,0.000771516,0.0060452204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018482538,0.00021282605,0.00048257664,0.0006356109,0.00075287843,0.0006464096,0.00069293287,0.000850667,0.00035400648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0074624056,0.0036874022,0.8834348,0.00096818205,0.0024921435,0.00057191966,0.0011528045,0.0017130303,0.003074547,0.0039399453,0.0013541876,0.09014871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001080906,0.0008449626,0.99430853,0.00009186084,0.00050990045,0.00010752564,0.0002899045,0.0007233599,0.00037935068,0.0016737537,0.0009400828,0.000022771286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002140573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027683973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060452204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030819728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024893426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02022326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290617535","doi":"10.1111/caje.12615","title":"Asset integration and risk‐taking in the laboratory","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Preference; Risk aversion (psychology); Asset (computer security); Prospect theory; Cash; Economics; Loss aversion; Experimental economics; Rank (graph theory); Task (project management); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Actuarial science; Financial economics; Computer science; Finance; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2811639811675608,"score_gpt":0.2764366426569144,"score_spread":0.004727338510646384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290617535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99153745,0.00014940287,0.0041728085,0.00022511341,0.000038847826,0.00014103475,0.00009269542,0.00008150207,0.0035611477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890343,0.00013260942,0.00819348,0.00021042746,0.000029214469,0.00048285545,0.0001035821,0.000025660356,0.0017879067],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784076,0.0009995336,0.00012065055,0.00046586094,0.00038207878,0.00019116349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99067396,0.0038656313,0.0024609943,0.001448663,0.0002609087,0.0012898439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030248552,0.0008413194,0.000696619,0.00027782877,0.00056055153,0.0019739368,0.0009914973,0.0010159803,0.0056946725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009530179,0.00045249224,0.00031424797,0.00021092992,0.0016132571,0.0010141714,0.0014429374,0.0016151652,0.0005904335],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.030912204,0.08649659,0.08249046,0.0011413451,0.00060825225,0.0012998353,0.0042955466,0.009639675,0.6326082,0.037210282,0.004343444,0.10895418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01095334,0.1596401,0.24012752,0.0005506214,0.0012386838,0.0023343503,0.0025857883,0.052977983,0.37682018,0.11891895,0.032778136,0.0010743982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034872827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027536784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056946725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005532127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065891404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019050539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291710419","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105245","title":"Biased confabulation in risky choice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Psychology; Confabulation (neural networks); Recall; Cognitive psychology; Task (project management); Context (archaeology); Encoding (memory); Cognition; Reconstructive memory; Memory errors; Episodic memory; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Explicit memory","score_opus":0.24053315150162266,"score_gpt":0.4307733157473803,"score_spread":0.19024016424575765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291710419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99115103,0.00032561185,0.0046919067,0.00011647811,0.000005448279,0.000013098591,0.00002488199,0.000012901567,0.003658515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761546,0.00012504059,0.0018750196,0.0000549296,0.0000057534526,0.000009354533,0.000037379545,0.00000725965,0.0002698683],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737597,0.0011460761,0.00021263819,0.00034267746,0.0007254164,0.00019732433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818778,0.01002707,0.0038153874,0.00273261,0.00081425015,0.0007329484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004871921,0.0002694848,0.00044953005,0.00067584804,0.00027106158,0.0015760169,0.0004339617,0.0007253658,0.0021062072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033680312,0.00034652042,0.00035566298,0.00045339612,0.001624435,0.001981432,0.0015939933,0.0011414748,0.00019461912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006893024,0.0010118276,0.5108241,0.00085104257,0.0008353897,0.0012296649,0.014634271,0.02033273,0.068674855,0.05356587,0.0016382847,0.31950894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000213336,0.001548855,0.7363997,0.00022123686,0.00028315833,0.0022589834,0.0031707298,0.036177218,0.022657847,0.19279751,0.0039939475,0.00027745627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012235071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010578416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004871921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042073743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032441484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025765479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292367851","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/u3bxc","title":"Replicability of the neuroanatomical correlates of impulsive personality traits in the ABCD study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton","funders":"","keywords":"Sensation seeking; Psychology; Impulsivity; Personality; Big Five personality traits; Developmental psychology; Similarity (geometry); Neuroimaging; Clinical psychology; Neuroscience; Social psychology","score_opus":0.15159379036983778,"score_gpt":0.42664324238466084,"score_spread":0.27504945201482306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292367851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993145,0.0003759423,0.0034430108,0.00011279893,0.000052366708,0.00015920009,0.0007949319,0.00002143713,0.0018953128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99738044,0.00004192867,0.0011319289,0.000048225233,0.000011016175,0.0001596922,0.0007954456,0.000024995836,0.00040632093],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923084,0.003909727,0.0008728778,0.0013643191,0.0012009937,0.00034362642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9495946,0.022208143,0.003999065,0.018010413,0.0049811616,0.0012066115],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025123062,0.0003728568,0.00049944076,0.0010921807,0.00057874003,0.0011685727,0.0011255678,0.00052391674,0.0011711468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068076484,0.00035533428,0.00067870936,0.00063110597,0.0012142863,0.0006788937,0.0015298919,0.00092466257,0.00046440598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009973327,0.00015465077,0.9731127,0.000082665785,0.00059333537,0.00031073118,0.003883303,0.00037964966,0.0035959235,0.00061784434,0.00061941065,0.015652465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006436516,0.0003725205,0.9924688,0.00004538114,0.00012318733,0.00033326336,0.00096546684,0.00085701543,0.0014575814,0.000842537,0.0024523118,0.00001755765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046459455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004913477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97487694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041244508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004893934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13286501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294129810","doi":"10.1037/pha0000596","title":"Income shock increases preferences for smaller immediate rewards and reduces alcohol demand among a sample of crowd-sourced adults.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; McMaster University; University of Kansas","keywords":"Shock (circulatory); Discounting; Economics; Demographic economics; Consumption (sociology); Delay discounting; Psychology; Sample (material); Alcohol consumption; Social psychology; Demography; Alcohol; Medicine","score_opus":0.1176602447636869,"score_gpt":0.47260267744109424,"score_spread":0.3549424326774073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294129810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99969256,0.000022081733,0.000010674109,0.00001523816,0.000002148084,0.000009340663,0.000069441885,0.0000013393969,0.00017725286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989458,0.000053288983,0.00008300075,0.00012527886,0.0000082105025,0.000017759377,0.00016662666,0.0000016935866,0.00059838215],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999232,0.000015562951,0.0000065028357,0.000017946517,0.000021348103,0.000015415546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968994,0.00006885231,0.000102296835,0.000020611551,0.000021270844,0.00009714714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028188596,0.0002086695,0.00024555507,0.000321645,0.00039613104,0.0006247983,0.00019000979,0.0003784035,0.004193712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011451027,0.00025473256,0.00010911561,0.00017894468,0.00023139635,0.0003201954,0.00033658568,0.00033113876,0.0007255269],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048437878,0.0057495595,0.9559235,0.0001109305,0.000118108335,0.0005858519,0.0026486896,0.00008854024,0.0063152374,0.00014393323,0.0024530764,0.02101884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001408761,0.0011814595,0.9961055,0.000008252196,0.000023945999,0.0002182985,0.0013783369,0.0001856145,0.00019332206,0.00010988258,0.00044840557,0.0000060797124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003567484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060860077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004193712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014153573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001578424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014029384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294834599","doi":"10.1108/s1475-148820220000025011","title":"Do You See What I See? The Effects of Dissenting Opinion on Information Acquisition and Decision Quality: An Eye-Tracking Study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in accounting behavioral research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Decision quality; Dissent; Quality (philosophy); Cognition; Cognitive resource theory; Psychology; Information processing; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Knowledge management; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.19624700645304616,"score_gpt":0.54455771775751,"score_spread":0.3483107113044639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294834599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99690956,0.000058001828,0.00028275966,0.000067161425,0.0000053453487,0.000016480855,0.000035825506,0.000003946573,0.002620924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981974,0.00006873043,0.0004456651,0.00012983619,0.000010686336,0.000033586966,0.00004009251,0.0000059925874,0.0010680942],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989728,0.00048580684,0.000044917382,0.000120919736,0.00031302095,0.00006256331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9643427,0.030683693,0.0028514394,0.0008867349,0.00079134014,0.00044406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023476544,0.00018014734,0.00018167186,0.00046032408,0.00040804487,0.0011307105,0.0002643326,0.00049870176,0.0022879501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021814445,0.0001231003,0.0001474828,0.00035486068,0.0004959395,0.00075816957,0.0005023621,0.0011127234,0.0003288281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00531912,0.0053170635,0.6347246,0.0003985484,0.00030072295,0.0011310721,0.08287967,0.0016208203,0.12039047,0.004769429,0.0050718435,0.13807662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006922441,0.0012203665,0.97601783,0.00005019827,0.00006243618,0.00035509508,0.009136994,0.003270494,0.0055810036,0.0019913977,0.0021661655,0.000078691635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015810723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018417308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023476544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030621883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014758944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012415707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300161208","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1938787","title":"On the Antecedents of Uncertainty Aversion","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity aversion; Economics; Inequity aversion; Risk aversion (psychology); Econometrics; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Expected utility hypothesis; Ambiguity","score_opus":0.07610903075126116,"score_gpt":0.3686019340387906,"score_spread":0.2924929032875294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300161208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90022796,0.0013762783,0.014944042,0.008701151,0.00011420519,0.000066118024,0.0002064001,0.000040718438,0.07432308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857855,0.000316456,0.0005143192,0.00009195572,0.00004448262,0.000009560756,0.000023655966,0.0000027693825,0.0004183099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890256,0.00055103766,0.00005676829,0.00012155173,0.00016635096,0.00020170475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9460345,0.046828523,0.0036616148,0.00120086,0.0010338583,0.0012406667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028859398,0.00031542458,0.0005413466,0.0011261114,0.000673204,0.002658388,0.00046322952,0.0019051435,0.010605075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027148187,0.0003390478,0.00047089267,0.00084530783,0.0020031799,0.001986475,0.0010477179,0.0024192836,0.00029337563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009887399,0.0018718465,0.15049177,0.00032143842,0.00034021676,0.0017031627,0.0015689401,0.022396164,0.0020359822,0.7703448,0.0036510918,0.044285864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016114056,0.00019436632,0.07163682,0.00010671971,0.00019525997,0.0003096371,0.0012099105,0.03545343,0.00050308066,0.8883783,0.0017921925,0.000059189973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001718208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015169985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010605075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008216047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093385915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03547746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306630471","doi":"10.1111/irfi.12399","title":"Buy and buy again: The impact of unique reference points on (re)purchase decisions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Finance","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; Point (geometry); Business; Disposition effect; Profitability index; Reference price; Behavioral economics; Heuristic; Stock trading; Stock (firearms); Point of sale; Marketing; Actuarial science; Finance; Economics; Microeconomics; Stock market; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.19146611052498674,"score_gpt":0.47310454485785297,"score_spread":0.2816384343328662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306630471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99731547,0.000184771,0.00048054504,0.000116197014,0.000004059675,0.000016866345,0.00006423461,0.0000051390466,0.001812691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992949,0.00006966894,0.00025842548,0.000019435867,0.0000038515277,0.000007963422,0.00006099822,0.0000027291244,0.00028213795],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718577,0.0016576753,0.00013462409,0.00027306852,0.00048036207,0.00026851086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9249157,0.05611598,0.012542877,0.0023698043,0.0013053466,0.0027503034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050670034,0.00019763396,0.00042334464,0.00060803856,0.00034101162,0.0022612163,0.000472989,0.00096362864,0.004527325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047392204,0.0001806579,0.0003881684,0.00061064004,0.00072166114,0.0011387336,0.00074053736,0.0014497862,0.0004874662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021850532,0.0013953606,0.92959803,0.00009846049,0.00034297627,0.00043265024,0.0016300853,0.005598467,0.0018115746,0.0023460537,0.00061427755,0.05394707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042332525,0.0009998083,0.97941256,0.000046304067,0.000117603704,0.00014440967,0.0014914877,0.011167995,0.0008498139,0.004767825,0.00090671284,0.00005327299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028516569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005871737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050670034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007327212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036591865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026797235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307336493","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x22001054","title":"A reputational perspective on rational framing effects","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Irrational number; Framing effect; Irrationality; Positive economics; Psychology; Prospect theory; Social psychology; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Rationality; Political science; Microeconomics; Computer science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.15277223386475944,"score_gpt":0.4394477405193199,"score_spread":0.28667550665456043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307336493","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013253669,0.0017062324,0.002659735,0.97012234,0.0024973375,0.000010361765,0.00003463216,0.000026474785,0.02161758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1464043,0.0030310391,0.002933222,0.81353474,0.024223248,0.00012055145,0.0000290298,0.000029575018,0.009694285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906787,0.0041559455,0.00039231134,0.0015034993,0.0026465058,0.0006229808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9279209,0.060029622,0.0025258923,0.0033256004,0.0049121073,0.001285809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017503357,0.00059096864,0.0010808639,0.0010578734,0.0024682072,0.0048897984,0.00249047,0.03014434,0.0073380107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05705713,0.0004102118,0.000896352,0.00062075414,0.017996876,0.00931902,0.002271989,0.03363561,0.0030329577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014694384,0.00006470639,0.0013345359,0.00009764794,0.000035843383,0.0013731482,0.0006358944,0.00053653313,0.0003582324,0.72035575,0.24442564,0.030635165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015940733,0.00007317309,0.001391296,0.00020200058,0.000025655152,0.0007967368,0.00034939754,0.0024551395,0.00041033333,0.85036314,0.14370733,0.00006629717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003163181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035095285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03014434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053458847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024389103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09256768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307338787","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x22001030","title":"Reframing rationality: Exogenous constraints on controlled information search","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Framing (construction); Rationality; Cognitive reframing; Frame problem; Ecological rationality; Framing effect; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Persuasion; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2101946881051097,"score_gpt":0.4225328666471056,"score_spread":0.2123381785419959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307338787","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008908413,0.0022141219,0.0154861435,0.9362384,0.001301805,0.00001900368,0.00008488146,0.000078953904,0.035668336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57598275,0.0063093333,0.011609648,0.37843096,0.012119463,0.0001952002,0.000083231425,0.00010755119,0.015161759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958929,0.0019896762,0.00019309805,0.0005944088,0.0009545359,0.00037541057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9410238,0.049681976,0.0019943607,0.00465073,0.0018458317,0.00080344453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008336035,0.0003030245,0.00086447434,0.00051785534,0.0011070753,0.0036267012,0.0015984328,0.015712453,0.005504117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04226127,0.00032956342,0.0004851875,0.0005045749,0.010199042,0.0066911015,0.0019215737,0.015017209,0.00212214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027991613,0.00005221105,0.0015874573,0.000091124835,0.0000407901,0.0017879975,0.0006660312,0.0017785003,0.00084187574,0.82477057,0.11942155,0.048681952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012341367,0.00002103007,0.00065230683,0.00005291807,0.000007639225,0.000398589,0.00014597205,0.0049132505,0.00039819937,0.93913794,0.054120254,0.000028553446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024962504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026257918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015712453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00341562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014957736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04408568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307342167","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x22000954","title":"Framing, equivalence, and rational inference","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Framing effect; Logical equivalence; Rationality; Inference; Psychology; Epistemology; Extensional definition; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Equivalence (formal languages); Philosophy; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.26183985187687364,"score_gpt":0.4497864488482503,"score_spread":0.18794659697137667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307342167","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033458954,0.002034272,0.00076775043,0.98465085,0.0031088067,0.0000056229014,0.000019637124,0.000010414995,0.009067931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041612715,0.0027841171,0.0017171827,0.9185744,0.026833296,0.000105703955,0.000024275023,0.000023296136,0.0083250385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834446,0.009105437,0.0006786426,0.0017487266,0.004062756,0.00095983554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9584399,0.03455384,0.0010612912,0.0020550753,0.003227796,0.00066206267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020774292,0.00057472126,0.0013673004,0.00071998127,0.0047279135,0.0053123087,0.0028346584,0.042721204,0.004497415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058197957,0.0005157853,0.0009483154,0.0006807405,0.026226107,0.008952729,0.0025890148,0.037550326,0.002327108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075751566,0.00002725156,0.00018660788,0.000086857144,0.000013571514,0.0003066273,0.00072524336,0.0002177049,0.000088897905,0.5206375,0.46053421,0.017099848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099772755,0.000016720262,0.0003166653,0.00020638056,0.0000110020665,0.00012388013,0.0003551311,0.0007246267,0.00014085158,0.78694373,0.2110287,0.000032436634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011924558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0135286935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042721204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007870657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004953868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10986626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307697007","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197501061.013.2","title":"Uncertainty Definitions and Their Problems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Epistemology; Uncertainty quantification; Management science; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.18864019421376857,"score_gpt":0.2850304944203758,"score_spread":0.09639030020660724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307697007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016326148,0.13039447,0.32325378,0.12927501,0.0057772202,0.00016496905,0.00035840785,0.00012062771,0.39432937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8405734,0.04318897,0.07651967,0.010834869,0.007932537,0.0006502633,0.00026300387,0.00021712486,0.019820135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800023,0.012709751,0.0010286856,0.0016280649,0.003938886,0.0006923877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9538935,0.040267408,0.0014397365,0.001236129,0.0025616584,0.00060167204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018842472,0.0014264318,0.0020324122,0.00603229,0.0056393463,0.012177895,0.0027911868,0.00571495,0.005841049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043003406,0.00081701484,0.0014803538,0.0059096874,0.03512165,0.021788487,0.0071720826,0.0108516365,0.00068108767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023724936,0.000002170265,0.000020314339,0.000030093312,0.0000028150234,0.000013946737,0.00022609408,0.00027357176,0.00000436641,0.99611145,0.001015584,0.0022973374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000112275,0.0000010436257,0.000012340084,0.00005560948,0.0000010562823,0.000012047676,0.000124279,0.00030092636,0.0000071150466,0.9948525,0.0046289735,0.0000028719655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028877007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011555942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018842472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008387367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002617839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09964973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307764679","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/3rcvj","title":"Blind to Bias? Young Children Do Not Anticipate that Sunk Costs Lead to Irrational Choices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sunk costs; Irrational number; Interpersonal communication; Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.37343658058715024,"score_gpt":0.4642055986083826,"score_spread":0.09076901802123238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307764679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927625,0.00031929434,0.0017563844,0.0003343638,0.0000233151,0.00001184047,0.00014985447,0.000041319618,0.004601229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968407,0.0002749972,0.0015867415,0.00021267026,0.000010323834,0.000015911846,0.00014414423,0.000015183377,0.00089931564],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920183,0.00015141474,0.00006939641,0.00022110701,0.00020634237,0.00014986053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99020535,0.003711326,0.003826172,0.0012184489,0.00059263705,0.00044594327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022977402,0.0003372057,0.00046693953,0.0004696847,0.00026545444,0.0017917405,0.00025600544,0.00078347384,0.0041096774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016564941,0.00048739763,0.00036894841,0.00026610543,0.0013326583,0.0015682575,0.00060566975,0.0009556254,0.0007790524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047877015,0.00015971452,0.9253156,0.00015058737,0.00006760861,0.0013195922,0.0050918157,0.0012686484,0.010526466,0.0057337857,0.0015695904,0.048317794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009867413,0.0005625809,0.9366582,0.00026106116,0.00016470763,0.0038999198,0.0047674594,0.0050352374,0.012128958,0.026816893,0.009487897,0.00011832182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029338915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003099106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041096774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039066904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048794365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013748229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308001699","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/dsp58","title":"Novelty preferences depend on goals","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Novelty; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.4310131025307807,"score_gpt":0.4897052054179808,"score_spread":0.058692102887200115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308001699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947259,0.00013511453,0.0015541685,0.000036673984,0.0000045576635,0.0000065050535,0.000053469863,0.000009208868,0.0034745093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99713504,0.000096451164,0.0017534108,0.000048748858,0.00000556872,0.000012019343,0.00013173961,0.000009114407,0.0008078888],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903226,0.00023939424,0.000083163795,0.00020906798,0.00033364262,0.00010243321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934488,0.0028973713,0.0014610766,0.0008610813,0.00054256595,0.00078923686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015983057,0.0002756736,0.00029426953,0.000293805,0.00019364344,0.00122538,0.0002242027,0.0005207103,0.0024820548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007139469,0.0002845573,0.0003650476,0.00015699642,0.00048490337,0.0009710333,0.00083055417,0.0007593322,0.00044930002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015201039,0.0003166645,0.77539474,0.00032223613,0.0002696814,0.001102152,0.004582767,0.0009894987,0.123895176,0.004835448,0.0006889715,0.086082526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028231245,0.0007823148,0.9796687,0.000026108688,0.00007015163,0.0011548777,0.0009134738,0.00088527414,0.010269501,0.0038765508,0.002272552,0.00005230532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042255982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011134184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024820548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018976988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012823653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0084527135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309456555","doi":"10.3390/jintelligence10040109","title":"When Type 2 Processing Misfires: The Indiscriminate Use of Statistical Thinking about Reasoning Problems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligence","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Universidade de Lisboa; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Spurious relationship; Probabilistic logic; Set (abstract data type); Base (topology); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Sensitivity (control systems); Outcome (game theory); Process (computing); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematics","score_opus":0.21168252230681614,"score_gpt":0.41002459648873135,"score_spread":0.1983420741819152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309456555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92648447,0.0002615055,0.055208746,0.0028638341,0.0002414986,0.0001790043,0.00012049409,0.0004928756,0.014147537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770964,0.00011440746,0.01963375,0.0018001164,0.00009228702,0.00016841186,0.00010872617,0.00020855534,0.0007774178],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776133,0.009298363,0.0019573998,0.0027779378,0.0074811867,0.0008718424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8039363,0.12910143,0.025447259,0.032657966,0.006235379,0.0026217035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024605773,0.000777546,0.0010209272,0.001213885,0.000655721,0.0051713777,0.0016436967,0.003464184,0.0026446194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22623801,0.0010184612,0.0005525592,0.00077928137,0.0041216407,0.0060068206,0.002888996,0.005329262,0.00050491723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010129522,0.0022567431,0.34517902,0.0015644709,0.0009007035,0.0046761427,0.03082272,0.011650335,0.23265105,0.102797255,0.01001493,0.24735706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076960237,0.0017481482,0.3038149,0.0005418156,0.000483606,0.008490634,0.00973425,0.08110014,0.13100503,0.444453,0.017129892,0.0007288902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005990963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005190275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024605773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082658837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000913932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13012928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310089850","doi":"10.1037/xge0001300","title":"Arbitrary fairness in reward and punishments.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"John E. Fetzer Memorial Trust","keywords":"Salient; Interchangeability; Social psychology; PsycINFO; Unit (ring theory); Preference; Psychology; Microeconomics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematical economics; Law; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.14764415907768302,"score_gpt":0.4786786134730557,"score_spread":0.33103445439537266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310089850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0666479,0.0072450866,0.20814353,0.021473264,0.0011805451,0.00048095,0.00074850535,0.00016438655,0.6939158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9413248,0.002162038,0.03723438,0.0025147262,0.0003222452,0.00038946277,0.00016653161,0.00005844973,0.015827354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98267466,0.010204677,0.000894827,0.0015991337,0.0040298235,0.0005967935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98117834,0.011410232,0.002869751,0.002422229,0.0016423464,0.00047707683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015515012,0.0005151343,0.00060209556,0.0011268315,0.0016562499,0.004548419,0.0010111588,0.0023437422,0.01426354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07015673,0.00034450783,0.0006010932,0.001389884,0.008766151,0.006720372,0.0027095696,0.0027135527,0.0013405917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008330364,0.000029468558,0.001501103,0.00009251384,0.000027917837,0.000059650018,0.0009149023,0.0011374509,0.00023369366,0.9621984,0.0029956969,0.030725947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031937667,0.000041797946,0.0035321987,0.00014992678,0.000020582549,0.00014877024,0.00036957863,0.0018862472,0.0003299566,0.973245,0.020220323,0.000023719193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022076806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031634565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015515012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002845352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020177038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08205223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310482589","doi":"10.1007/s11002-022-09657-0","title":"How uncertainty affects information search among consumers: a curvilinear perspective","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marketing Letters","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada); Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University; Northwestern University","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Contrast (vision); Product (mathematics); Econometrics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05428774371059829,"score_gpt":0.33202847526915497,"score_spread":0.27774073155855666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310482589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634571,0.0013884944,0.011758663,0.00510887,0.00003147558,0.00006646271,0.00057005114,0.0000839509,0.017534906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964593,0.00026749077,0.0008358947,0.0001138752,0.000015458052,0.0000096581925,0.00008430901,0.000021377831,0.0021926095],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970611,0.0013561767,0.00015788036,0.0004356341,0.00043512508,0.00055405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8613067,0.113612756,0.011478783,0.004571199,0.0065018088,0.0025287773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054328633,0.00044020746,0.00079280237,0.00182565,0.0010519425,0.008139874,0.00095161947,0.0030648254,0.015388286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076771036,0.0007867279,0.0012984173,0.0026952608,0.0018323967,0.0056742243,0.0020490843,0.0028598472,0.0013949317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016653867,0.00069232174,0.8402823,0.0002463923,0.00077166705,0.00062217837,0.0028657187,0.06597426,0.0023650895,0.05001649,0.002185956,0.032312203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114635885,0.00063771,0.6040899,0.00018354645,0.0007544216,0.00052622764,0.007105306,0.2483993,0.0014535659,0.13168666,0.004776798,0.00027184584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02521414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018422725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02521414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026325176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014184099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051478922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310613873","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2022.11.016","title":"Comparative incompleteness: Measurement, behavioral manifestations and elicitation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Aarhus Universitets Forskningsfond; Aarhus Universitet","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.28435190834990415,"score_gpt":0.42293090504320824,"score_spread":0.1385789966933041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310613873","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43849152,0.00033218128,0.55086535,0.0006907237,0.000018570003,0.0003983143,0.0005568197,0.00010246371,0.008544031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.899146,0.00022747924,0.09918433,0.00008754579,0.000015066628,0.0005127612,0.00034489745,0.000013850185,0.0004679975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98304105,0.01062727,0.0012920017,0.0011407818,0.0036128238,0.00028608242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9141357,0.057298575,0.012412648,0.011529073,0.003723084,0.00090102287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016335921,0.0005382626,0.00066187687,0.0011853848,0.0004918006,0.0016654712,0.00076171476,0.00072882615,0.0017886669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08649713,0.000430709,0.00048550623,0.0012319266,0.0016963619,0.0032782992,0.002251196,0.0012874741,0.000131326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015718404,0.00080869097,0.06369736,0.0019117614,0.00047922193,0.00036348132,0.012864952,0.054053307,0.06833112,0.5348018,0.0013644403,0.25975198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013973456,0.0012463282,0.049044035,0.0004939135,0.00014817015,0.0006918943,0.0031087343,0.13306026,0.049813494,0.7539065,0.008141611,0.00020525786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005431923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005343436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016335921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011174823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010293111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086393654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310641393","doi":"10.1177/17456916221134575","title":"Improving the Generalizability of Behavioral Science by Using Reality Checks: A Tool for Assessing Heterogeneity in Participants’ Consumership of Study Stimuli","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Realism; Psychology; Relevance (law); External validity; Writ; Cognitive psychology; Ecological validity; Behavioural sciences; Social psychology; Nomothetic; Experimental psychology; Epistemology; Cognition; Developmental psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.48277439023773405,"score_gpt":0.5657951970758375,"score_spread":0.08302080683810342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310641393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5979782,0.0009962253,0.35573897,0.002266312,0.0008579755,0.011559885,0.0014108052,0.0016339114,0.027557686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8632465,0.00019379635,0.11866931,0.001264459,0.00020879677,0.014443062,0.00059279177,0.00039441552,0.0009869019],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.78130376,0.16081528,0.01888867,0.016872581,0.020268524,0.0018510324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.25735825,0.54019475,0.054682694,0.11859524,0.027065255,0.0021036977],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24445055,0.0016900896,0.0015411532,0.00458468,0.002651837,0.0054053646,0.0021968547,0.002467876,0.0072819665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5179405,0.0012846427,0.0024078474,0.0030266405,0.0063664108,0.0059823287,0.006889654,0.004234876,0.0011412096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008795229,0.0058846436,0.44330293,0.005505435,0.0051116603,0.00072733837,0.113912605,0.004133523,0.047616944,0.03131529,0.011808832,0.32188553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018048146,0.009375139,0.7537187,0.0016405217,0.0020444328,0.0010200958,0.01621897,0.022077905,0.05076256,0.082735635,0.05738948,0.0012117017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010331647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009536957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75554943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013804152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001519627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.931727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313425009","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008603","title":"Facilitating sender-receiver agreement in communicated probabilities: Is it best to use words, numbers or both?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Ministère de la Défense Nationale","keywords":"Communication source; Agreement; Meaning (existential); Bounded function; Computer science; Scheme (mathematics); Natural language processing; Statistics; Linguistics; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2893744416054432,"score_gpt":0.43794357005309287,"score_spread":0.1485691284476497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313425009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92033005,0.00031708123,0.052139096,0.002706947,0.00019539839,0.0004464474,0.00007225034,0.00025181845,0.023540894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98222005,0.00013386142,0.016589416,0.00020784514,0.000058242516,0.00019708188,0.000018512636,0.000025992204,0.0005491551],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95033306,0.04285834,0.0015620873,0.0013050135,0.0033028477,0.00063866714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6541233,0.3078081,0.019443382,0.009585233,0.0068511465,0.0021888183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041014723,0.0005438671,0.0005264545,0.0007778228,0.0008185113,0.0038131154,0.0009886831,0.0014362091,0.007815674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.252467,0.00057047856,0.00029833565,0.0005556899,0.0025412089,0.0063244193,0.0031907747,0.0016980125,0.0011600947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010409946,0.004206728,0.09266649,0.0039681396,0.0003165184,0.0008014345,0.089815795,0.009327398,0.13116664,0.06307134,0.0054995157,0.5887501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00431786,0.030840086,0.25930783,0.0057331696,0.0019442643,0.0020052951,0.09921096,0.15426883,0.18888205,0.21095896,0.040910643,0.0016200463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005390713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004984432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041014723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008529567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013708207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21690917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313425078","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500007920","title":"Effect of confidence interval construction on judgment accuracy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Confidence interval; Univariate; Statistics; Range (aeronautics); Interval (graph theory); Expert elicitation; Skepticism; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology; Multivariate statistics; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10031021409711671,"score_gpt":0.408698774410091,"score_spread":0.3083885603129743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313425078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811947,0.00062974956,0.013669341,0.00017301472,0.000066687666,0.00017412027,0.000067938396,0.00016674738,0.0038578676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99091303,0.00010489267,0.008437177,0.000081972845,0.000027927865,0.00014048003,0.000057991965,0.000051876737,0.00018471651],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9261548,0.050653823,0.006018999,0.0046826727,0.0112648215,0.00122484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.19461136,0.74806,0.022986766,0.02426309,0.008846174,0.0012325944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04649839,0.00070372265,0.0010078609,0.00091938814,0.0006671701,0.0024328781,0.001181789,0.0012673247,0.0027187683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42432696,0.00073292723,0.0006264034,0.0009323228,0.0015729108,0.0026366913,0.0022285571,0.0019193087,0.00039178997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.055818137,0.0037013884,0.23892282,0.002379259,0.0015200735,0.00039625756,0.015263195,0.012301055,0.24153887,0.0043792464,0.0015751804,0.42220446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020323638,0.015536156,0.7590708,0.000839112,0.0014627822,0.0011654395,0.0029102024,0.05275438,0.14737535,0.01090967,0.005274779,0.0006690032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082216423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007608602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04649839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009006539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065773324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24590993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313429046","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008159","title":"Coherence of probability judgments from uncertain evidence: Does ACH help?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Credibility; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Weighting; Psychology; Bayesian probability; Empirical evidence; Reliability (semiconductor); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Inter-rater reliability; Computer science; Statistics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Medicine; Rating scale","score_opus":0.27471690520012837,"score_gpt":0.41853323124620895,"score_spread":0.14381632604608058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313429046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8701899,0.0017453658,0.11246601,0.0024733136,0.000085060594,0.0003776462,0.00009359619,0.00044087737,0.012128176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710305,0.00022134939,0.028162869,0.00016331916,0.00006213894,0.0000563082,0.00005285586,0.00002830887,0.00022239445],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9723723,0.017790113,0.0023574948,0.0020481928,0.004907726,0.00052415166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.568257,0.3658759,0.030423503,0.021989845,0.010739703,0.0027140595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04216079,0.0006779733,0.0015333003,0.002209114,0.0006461257,0.003135116,0.0015097577,0.0012610669,0.0034754502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27597862,0.00065961364,0.0006022198,0.0015025574,0.0024405096,0.009292265,0.004359937,0.002248293,0.0003689987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068783257,0.0015435771,0.090121195,0.0035700025,0.0012035592,0.0004406925,0.01774986,0.010136677,0.043535765,0.030304449,0.0020929591,0.7924229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019818116,0.009889349,0.3373821,0.0016756959,0.0025345325,0.0015270172,0.013132847,0.2174288,0.049666625,0.35390735,0.010270154,0.00060365937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005083515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081555365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04216079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070542074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085690396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22297025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313429049","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008652","title":"Denotative and connotative management of uncertainty: A computational dual-process model","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Waterloo","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Computer science; Rationality; Artificial intelligence; Dual (grammatical number); Management science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11985350020386008,"score_gpt":0.42750152347370346,"score_spread":0.30764802326984336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313429049","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07521114,0.00016277807,0.89231455,0.002480291,0.00005670867,0.00006146072,0.000111853,0.0001236507,0.02947743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9069427,0.00013170841,0.08713619,0.00014113187,0.000051205276,0.00014951671,0.00005673802,0.000036227517,0.005354402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984132,0.0008022279,0.000058672966,0.00021176474,0.0003555303,0.0001585482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995961,0.0025662745,0.00034086278,0.00039956157,0.000384056,0.00034826403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002366886,0.0004737917,0.0007537952,0.0010533169,0.0009081154,0.003431148,0.002086831,0.0018442018,0.005923952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008177492,0.00048659043,0.0011650798,0.00081294816,0.003690615,0.004252951,0.0025656023,0.0019763412,0.0004891656],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034882578,0.000042903113,0.00044226358,0.00002705445,0.000020167015,0.00008678693,0.00031493267,0.09446438,0.00040246366,0.9000933,0.0002920493,0.0037786963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020416024,0.000011800741,0.00009396809,0.0000068935665,0.000010679572,0.000030074305,0.000039135248,0.45007643,0.00013620299,0.5487194,0.0008446968,0.000010303211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036452003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002144809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005923952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001998109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013915938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01981759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315434499","doi":"10.1017/9781009362627","title":"Estimation of Structural Models Using Experimental Data From the Lab and the Field","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Replicate; Structural estimation; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Estimation; Field (mathematics); Experimental data; Element (criminal law); Machine learning; Software; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Econometrics; Data mining; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics; Systems engineering","score_opus":0.2350825782111147,"score_gpt":0.3681970900039012,"score_spread":0.13311451179278652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315434499","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13922197,0.00054211426,0.82089585,0.001345081,0.000107807085,0.0012197639,0.0049981163,0.00060457544,0.03106473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48865816,0.0013696424,0.4854344,0.0006592412,0.0000899899,0.00527561,0.009784474,0.00018914184,0.008539295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98706067,0.0097084185,0.0005300607,0.0008778984,0.0016119006,0.00021103548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86224586,0.11621422,0.0056948964,0.011772224,0.0037169668,0.00035587893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018571448,0.0009027012,0.0009223656,0.0014953669,0.0005885134,0.001876241,0.002020649,0.0014039696,0.0121345185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078489974,0.000734534,0.0012754416,0.0027058895,0.0015247697,0.0027804517,0.0016429354,0.0025568425,0.0024050944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087287236,0.0022872356,0.051898398,0.00189605,0.0005264187,0.00025562913,0.0029618002,0.16023779,0.0044452623,0.4101801,0.017605219,0.3468333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005680531,0.0016189828,0.038800154,0.00072522525,0.00034505886,0.00026951876,0.0022031355,0.32832512,0.00962542,0.5857736,0.031538,0.00020765889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032658516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042029982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018571448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017167267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015614422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098216414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315752886","doi":"10.1186/s41235-022-00459-6","title":"A value accumulation account of unhealthy food choices: testing the influence of outcome salience under varying time constraints","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Research Principles and Implications","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Vlaamse regering; KU Leuven; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Outcome (game theory); Value (mathematics); Economics; Psychology; Econometrics; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.7063597554522417,"score_gpt":0.5698500877862237,"score_spread":0.13650966766601802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315752886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841702,0.0001015533,0.0080432175,0.00019507651,0.000014792321,0.000063307314,0.00007946395,0.000014557932,0.0073178955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948895,0.000064271706,0.0043110517,0.00008976614,0.000014083132,0.00010481262,0.00009546757,0.000020363801,0.0004106847],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865377,0.00053274323,0.000055739827,0.00038817318,0.00025506035,0.00011455201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807803,0.01300772,0.002653047,0.0021528346,0.00042733154,0.0009788277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037562111,0.0005172234,0.00060361763,0.00041616015,0.00051745,0.0015708467,0.0007667903,0.0007346471,0.005944799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020446219,0.0006017347,0.0009454294,0.0003955384,0.0013325999,0.0026933302,0.0019294902,0.0012384746,0.00021921663],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.026016952,0.0065898634,0.41671872,0.0017708684,0.0013000799,0.0018914076,0.010073025,0.043040603,0.18615282,0.1615271,0.0012852662,0.14363326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013328352,0.004316321,0.6429648,0.00009553213,0.0006342905,0.00058005337,0.0010285919,0.117265165,0.010762072,0.21855186,0.0022880223,0.00018047703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022423526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019305319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005944799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007492979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079763046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019887328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317464635","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2301.06930","title":"Risk-averse mean field games: exploitability and non-asymptotic analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Hong Kong University of Science and Technology","keywords":"Regret; Uniqueness; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Mean field theory; Perspective (graphical); Action (physics); Field (mathematics); Construct (python library); Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Statistics; Pure mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.23284196438567797,"score_gpt":0.29173817799019747,"score_spread":0.05889621360451949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317464635","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09945418,0.00045419854,0.8905792,0.0009995009,0.000042588057,0.00007658303,0.0000780917,0.00008425049,0.008231249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.938121,0.00060822675,0.055713322,0.0002482441,0.00006471068,0.00023052837,0.000083506966,0.00005036583,0.0048800483],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986376,0.0007828515,0.000040767412,0.00016420778,0.00022165968,0.00015296304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908303,0.007196831,0.0008070163,0.00033819606,0.00043987887,0.0003878269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044872235,0.0013674638,0.001416825,0.0011323289,0.00061461836,0.0013485535,0.0013375615,0.0016094192,0.0019581488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020414855,0.00051264744,0.0012492839,0.0005042098,0.002790827,0.0028979932,0.0016911164,0.002095186,0.00015085726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064000924,0.00005401561,0.0009927609,0.000080613536,0.00005991255,0.000104435254,0.00013451406,0.5245469,0.0011611334,0.46803677,0.0005207133,0.0042442596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008480191,0.000033108015,0.00012497873,0.000015894295,0.0000070440365,0.000020087442,0.000024194751,0.88349795,0.00013827844,0.115884505,0.00023604717,0.000009407094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003270081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018885866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044872235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021948395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010451768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023730934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318672180","doi":"10.1177/17470218231155897","title":"Interpretation of ambiguous trials along with reasoning strategy is related to causal judgements in zero-contingency learning","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Contingency; Psychology; Counterexample; Interpretation (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Replicate; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.129037561609868,"score_gpt":0.4848448086591169,"score_spread":0.3558072470492489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318672180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99787486,0.000043853022,0.00091518357,0.00003636674,0.00000586935,0.000013612216,0.000018863793,0.000011647699,0.0010797952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986681,0.000034885183,0.00090274966,0.000020360381,0.0000044836092,0.000009295634,0.000060912535,0.000014291859,0.00028491078],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978999,0.0005962697,0.00024276301,0.00047256835,0.00061959965,0.00016884191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9535591,0.027846793,0.012294563,0.0032679397,0.0014365701,0.00159505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036270702,0.00033164362,0.00045567716,0.0007108035,0.00028660885,0.0019364725,0.00042911107,0.00078989565,0.003102567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043058038,0.0004592133,0.00029193397,0.00030909065,0.0010004677,0.0013416314,0.0009106168,0.0016943525,0.00024048897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056994148,0.0022310992,0.79952866,0.00032104136,0.0004557147,0.0007628456,0.008178046,0.0069773607,0.101729535,0.003798041,0.0006404483,0.06967772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008260038,0.00061765057,0.9644384,0.00005501952,0.00010909855,0.00038046704,0.0008890852,0.014476897,0.0070678103,0.01132718,0.00045797534,0.000097824224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008823512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011158404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036270702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032160053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003327191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019182026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319232666","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/dm8xn","title":"An aberrant abundance of Cronbach’s alpha values at .70","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; SHRM Foundation; University of Bern; Virginia Commonwealth University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Cronbach's alpha; Rule of thumb; Reliability (semiconductor); Transparency (behavior); Psychology; Computer science; Econometrics; Clinical psychology; Psychometrics; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.31215825820456417,"score_gpt":0.47327763584986177,"score_spread":0.1611193776452976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319232666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41396716,0.038352996,0.2149552,0.026879923,0.011222876,0.002138007,0.030303644,0.0040545226,0.2581256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86446685,0.008784138,0.09153828,0.007949256,0.0018159043,0.0034004496,0.010670093,0.0016436476,0.009731439],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.889933,0.03457074,0.017792387,0.010831922,0.045025513,0.0018464007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.52660865,0.3035798,0.043732464,0.042101562,0.08050262,0.0034749191],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.078128465,0.001360352,0.0018543113,0.01199824,0.0020645238,0.006641937,0.0017550263,0.0020372255,0.0076587214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3723276,0.0013222791,0.0015173929,0.0190456,0.004235236,0.006165397,0.003596778,0.003592008,0.0052891327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000699427,0.00022818062,0.28717923,0.01004708,0.0024382097,0.0008118224,0.020770587,0.0017609646,0.005282038,0.0630987,0.19761589,0.4100679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012536706,0.0005461097,0.44824257,0.0088081295,0.00063220854,0.0012601934,0.01360318,0.0032802287,0.0064802887,0.13089283,0.38569948,0.00042936564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027543998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034957111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92187154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021285869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00304396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41318774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320084643","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-90913-0_157","title":"Decision-Making","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rational planning model; Management science; Process (computing); Decision-making; Affect (linguistics); Decision field theory; Rational analysis; Rational choice theory (criminology); Rationality; Decision maker; Computer science; Psychology; Business decision mapping; Epistemology; Decision engineering; Engineering; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Decision support system; Management; Operations management; Cognition","score_opus":0.14628789702286696,"score_gpt":0.40258602998072274,"score_spread":0.25629813295785575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320084643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024819006,0.0017166754,0.0595988,0.002497779,0.00039403446,0.00012220794,0.00021342712,0.0001291529,0.93284607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15537483,0.0065415045,0.06114272,0.0020724959,0.00043936688,0.00045297074,0.00088795816,0.00017022892,0.7729179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896204,0.0003216451,0.00003819016,0.00016364835,0.00042990452,0.00008458495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992675,0.00031624667,0.000036832505,0.00015410471,0.00015589672,0.0000693415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011783554,0.0009478348,0.0004735109,0.0007430171,0.0009014167,0.0042115445,0.0010908606,0.0011489613,0.06109462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027287977,0.00027882546,0.00051286,0.0009245392,0.0020662409,0.002926878,0.0015331432,0.0016686114,0.020397833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010491874,0.000037736234,0.00009095816,0.000082868595,0.000009616524,0.000025565776,0.00019250793,0.001097587,0.0004596879,0.91043836,0.020209422,0.06734517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006379989,0.000025997322,0.00019531808,0.00011834816,0.000007925431,0.000068377776,0.00016622068,0.002199573,0.0008404929,0.68983716,0.30652276,0.000011546752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011127467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001059367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06109462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016592093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019649111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20438182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320726359","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucac055","title":"Beyond Numbers: An Ambiguity–Accessibility–Applicability Framework to Explain the Attraction Effect","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Attraction; CLARITY; Perception; Set (abstract data type); Cognitive psychology; Conceptual framework; Psychology; Phenomenon; Process (computing); Social psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.4113208688973397,"score_gpt":0.6004679743157054,"score_spread":0.1891471054183657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320726359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5929835,0.00088954845,0.34302092,0.003119006,0.00015138462,0.00033701494,0.00015290406,0.00016642243,0.05917924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838763,0.00010591326,0.015106003,0.00012842986,0.000026064006,0.000073946845,0.000017915834,0.000014121916,0.00065129856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990791,0.00049782067,0.00004514269,0.000115049,0.00018590815,0.00007701326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912072,0.0066793724,0.00055870076,0.00083471136,0.00047690576,0.0002431652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035387706,0.0004062043,0.0004514096,0.0009517278,0.00052005507,0.0013434868,0.0009767411,0.0010868323,0.009812722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011524911,0.00027432412,0.0009717011,0.00039195453,0.003923461,0.004557563,0.0018001539,0.00154959,0.00046053235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006166276,0.0004406021,0.009803543,0.00032615164,0.00005848968,0.000662591,0.0014238167,0.020795677,0.024328638,0.8972513,0.0006701349,0.043622486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085635394,0.00020834194,0.010688619,0.0000434476,0.000030383717,0.00027603537,0.00029440637,0.07341707,0.0025174986,0.9107796,0.001611554,0.000047421974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085176766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063624064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009812722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075847266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047980231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03282678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321103083","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/2b4jv","title":"Can the Prosocial Benefits of Episodic Simulation Transfer to Different People and Situational Contexts?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Auckland; Strong; Pennington Biomedical Research Foundation","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Situational ethics; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Social psychology; Transferability; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Geography; Machine learning","score_opus":0.18888571384297995,"score_gpt":0.40295194146741203,"score_spread":0.2140662276244321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321103083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835977,0.000106709966,0.007814081,0.00033991702,0.000022532116,0.000081803795,0.00003053076,0.000040186194,0.007966597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962218,0.0000826732,0.003236952,0.00008038755,0.0000077963605,0.0000838797,0.0000373311,0.000012055034,0.00023710012],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967919,0.0020242033,0.00012461763,0.0004258899,0.00038489143,0.00024851522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891747,0.0066308626,0.0012451959,0.0021003117,0.00022733955,0.00062160275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032759302,0.0004821072,0.000578078,0.00047332208,0.0004382494,0.0015296267,0.00071400043,0.0011317267,0.005878148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023379419,0.00042512183,0.0005046223,0.00023087338,0.0020637657,0.002722523,0.0027697969,0.0010620133,0.00037074197],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012155633,0.0150258895,0.20069715,0.002499278,0.0015041865,0.002055947,0.0298627,0.048269197,0.24437378,0.090993546,0.0012732126,0.35128945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014010771,0.012430483,0.6856983,0.00054962415,0.00069999497,0.0023259006,0.014636264,0.0515314,0.044524923,0.17230201,0.013488385,0.00041169088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000508179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004127267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005878148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044275649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053049537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019664347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322487098","doi":"10.1097/ede.0000000000001591","title":"Mindel C. Sheps: Counted, Dead or Alive","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Epidemiology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Psychology; Measure (data warehouse); Computer science; Developmental psychology; Data mining","score_opus":0.6506561001732234,"score_gpt":0.5616319595836654,"score_spread":0.08902414058955799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322487098","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025555233,0.088849105,0.099446915,0.7692879,0.017899603,0.000121900266,0.00056123396,0.000114316994,0.021163471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23167454,0.11534349,0.11740503,0.45637864,0.04694541,0.0011057383,0.00042732665,0.00041380705,0.030306136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97291565,0.015216899,0.0015496047,0.003809338,0.0060337926,0.00047477108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.879824,0.106675826,0.0032680521,0.0018844518,0.0066769207,0.0016706355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03323573,0.0011736769,0.0019470156,0.0036933513,0.0023243146,0.004290721,0.0019083258,0.0060456763,0.0048987647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16632219,0.0006630585,0.0011502677,0.0037224232,0.019256774,0.011027109,0.00221484,0.011308235,0.0011595604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001989508,0.000026619322,0.0018573706,0.0004983482,0.00009263381,0.00018053417,0.0015372935,0.00089637516,0.00009791306,0.66066563,0.21067885,0.123269565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059234,0.000038250255,0.0009559236,0.0008079621,0.000064489985,0.00026175627,0.00040077878,0.0012991152,0.00026837309,0.7854644,0.21028751,0.000092139126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024109388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018878927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03323573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005988579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071475757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17576945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323267236","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2023.02.005","title":"Stabilizing expectations when shifting from analytical to intuitive reasoning: The role of prediction errors in reasoning","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cortex","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.08232481763744136,"score_gpt":0.37784651131974223,"score_spread":0.29552169368230086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323267236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9096758,0.00042306408,0.075751774,0.0028461015,0.00027265152,0.000048371934,0.00018101622,0.00026398106,0.010537313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950931,0.000087010594,0.0040653995,0.00014303274,0.000030970044,0.00001081843,0.000045484918,0.000051549665,0.00047263148],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984504,0.00056642684,0.00008622723,0.00037134867,0.00031044273,0.00021521015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98718774,0.008413447,0.0018925967,0.0012176365,0.00071501906,0.0005735415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00393697,0.00040962975,0.00047461173,0.0003938796,0.00032109566,0.0040048594,0.0010091345,0.0013199942,0.004083312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044786185,0.00068840827,0.0003865357,0.00030459996,0.0013785345,0.0032619208,0.0013008905,0.0022063882,0.00060308224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0073387595,0.0017906679,0.09020648,0.0006098609,0.0010652079,0.0010683332,0.0043729492,0.17285572,0.24373734,0.14225385,0.00904916,0.32565165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031536116,0.00036315038,0.084343046,0.00007768304,0.00019837476,0.00027720083,0.0007111733,0.42425948,0.020342413,0.46761593,0.0013674838,0.00012870903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020806368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011603925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004083312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008064217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096759695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020820975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323521535","doi":"10.7202/1097014ar","title":"AFFECTIVE STATES, HAPPINESS, AND WELL-BEING","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.04490411582684148,"score_gpt":0.34883248711962395,"score_spread":0.3039283712927825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323521535","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007963677,0.9187856,0.0048810984,0.024731558,0.0050434526,0.00007704698,0.00079444854,0.000043536234,0.03767972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15118772,0.7973496,0.007953664,0.009693493,0.008783584,0.00053466175,0.0008296623,0.00003763805,0.023630029],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994916,0.00027232207,0.00003670442,0.000071814226,0.00009444548,0.00003304871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991425,0.00064038875,0.00006247753,0.000020177331,0.0000923593,0.00004210172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010279503,0.0007334607,0.000558167,0.0011417136,0.00047682304,0.0022535182,0.0004223935,0.001721567,0.01113203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020559789,0.0002721951,0.00042040925,0.0014301437,0.0016532793,0.0020684493,0.0011985992,0.002176869,0.0010843157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027167186,0.0002949676,0.0086316755,0.0063110776,0.00024782852,0.00030103183,0.005292388,0.001226374,0.0014237873,0.29265934,0.18115565,0.50218415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028988037,0.00032585868,0.066166185,0.007870697,0.00011306582,0.00079626014,0.0034477161,0.00072216045,0.00036333132,0.2580163,0.6620266,0.00012286892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002318479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028687418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01113203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008709203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062963465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037240326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323793439","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4380365","title":"A Manager and an AI Walk into a Bar: Does ChatGPT Make Biased Decisions Like We Do?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Heuristics; Regret; Computer science; Probabilistic logic; Optimism bias; Overconfidence effect; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive bias; Decision aids; Weighting; Artificial intelligence; Optimism; Psychology; Data science; Machine learning; Social psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.054837994182220344,"score_gpt":0.38383335592718854,"score_spread":0.3289953617449682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323793439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9177834,0.0005313259,0.0030411463,0.032439694,0.00022713706,0.00003438682,0.000052574036,0.00004921937,0.045841116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99474394,0.00012067352,0.0005067166,0.0019840088,0.000059811544,0.000008321304,0.000011105272,0.000011421723,0.00255403],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974668,0.0016579035,0.00004764902,0.00020863111,0.00026329968,0.00035568123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97791356,0.014807454,0.0031411182,0.00074706995,0.0009891186,0.0024015887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045585623,0.00016588862,0.0003079764,0.00052964553,0.001553687,0.0036201507,0.0005163569,0.0031502573,0.0113006085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039072655,0.0002546493,0.00018825763,0.00043596188,0.0021181954,0.0033418743,0.00089712173,0.0022125356,0.001607752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003200128,0.0019320264,0.6881811,0.00025342766,0.00037670264,0.0037260908,0.03675588,0.0026976876,0.004625045,0.07883998,0.030219665,0.14919229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005204708,0.001670069,0.5102062,0.00040990487,0.00048063797,0.003987984,0.15809384,0.05049217,0.0030417782,0.22787441,0.042844795,0.0003777449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006165213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008137396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0113006085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007177903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072597334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037804246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324141783","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2322","title":"Demand for information about potential wins and losses: Does it matter if information matters?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Action (physics); Chose; Instrumental variable; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.05207263000074558,"score_gpt":0.3937826926659199,"score_spread":0.34171006266517434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324141783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99363554,0.00014271785,0.0005336998,0.00046154603,0.000012384373,0.000012982598,0.00012332028,0.000009518766,0.005068267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99917716,0.00005065326,0.00020357546,0.00009044977,0.000011451398,0.000009152987,0.000071233495,0.000007504934,0.00037894564],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998442,0.0006049665,0.00012486821,0.0003220837,0.00035849813,0.00014765079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9422439,0.041425698,0.008727413,0.00344267,0.0012009316,0.0029593732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028951766,0.0002156741,0.0006288988,0.00040672487,0.000370795,0.0018833033,0.00038161557,0.0009983344,0.011403385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036248095,0.00031596274,0.0002898556,0.00038412175,0.0008350266,0.0015928615,0.0007186523,0.0010494086,0.0005953267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0136598945,0.0033105465,0.86490554,0.0005458293,0.000476748,0.00051779044,0.0025171395,0.0032822066,0.030509843,0.009552557,0.0022936014,0.06842837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025488218,0.0014304366,0.96928746,0.00007074569,0.00024416798,0.00026137682,0.0011574611,0.0065574283,0.0033961968,0.015150762,0.002119353,0.00006969925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001350275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013547867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011403385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044275544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003337481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038148105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4328114234","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/c9jq6","title":"Scarcity Captures Attention and Induces Neglect: Eyetracking and Behavoral Evidence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Scarcity; Neglect; Economics; Psychology; Microeconomics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.457928043024434,"score_gpt":0.4728088798442774,"score_spread":0.014880836819843368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4328114234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98649395,0.0010278191,0.0064178235,0.0005360965,0.000030109493,0.0000716779,0.0002515331,0.00003849987,0.005132433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99600345,0.0004242663,0.0024389739,0.00028653137,0.00003318553,0.00011098574,0.00016186197,0.000016863829,0.0005239954],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989679,0.00025852726,0.00009649989,0.00021836488,0.0003576533,0.00010119565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99427116,0.0021813633,0.0021868227,0.00065370346,0.00048277766,0.00022422317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018448647,0.0003867784,0.00034375014,0.0009173454,0.0004888491,0.00064496684,0.00033522677,0.0007197658,0.0031452256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009371066,0.00033064914,0.0002946384,0.00052218896,0.0012338578,0.0010336319,0.0011990195,0.0005863712,0.00018819967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035947743,0.0013655641,0.51969934,0.0011345805,0.00039463383,0.0012939731,0.0053481967,0.000888093,0.35836685,0.0029510914,0.0020654434,0.10289744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049358187,0.0006386422,0.97974193,0.00012126218,0.00007749316,0.00055015134,0.0009682051,0.0008928932,0.01183083,0.0030675253,0.002029888,0.000031845677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041546477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00618603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041546477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046287067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044076235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010521829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4352976756","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-28719-0_24","title":"Value Cores for Inner and Outer Alignment: Simulating Personality Formation via Iterated Policy Selection and Preference Learning with Self-World Modeling Active Inference Agents","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Communications in computer and information science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Iterated function; Selection (genetic algorithm); Inference; Preference; Value (mathematics); Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Personality; Machine learning; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.24261878147536317,"score_gpt":0.41469309620417333,"score_spread":0.17207431472881016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4352976756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8541502,0.00011659336,0.13730541,0.0007132723,0.000090704845,0.000052511463,0.00013651283,0.00018464796,0.0072502284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844492,0.000021858781,0.013754007,0.00005608344,0.000010490619,0.000037340604,0.0000482378,0.00003283909,0.001589919],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997012,0.000157313,0.000008037103,0.00004029185,0.000028877623,0.00006439012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99501663,0.0038666488,0.00023193278,0.00024169598,0.00023758943,0.00040559383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014532289,0.00033392312,0.00073733507,0.00041662733,0.0007340274,0.0011520913,0.0011824183,0.0015121965,0.0037601802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010245942,0.00052096153,0.00057460374,0.0004013739,0.0012084225,0.0015426449,0.0011116941,0.0016067765,0.00026824692],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018653131,0.00014492743,0.00230046,0.00002091588,0.000028672473,0.00006448797,0.00018596169,0.9636,0.0004599134,0.026317835,0.0007818058,0.005908478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000884365,0.0000057112625,0.00008572537,0.0000010949958,0.0000014857753,0.0000015101375,0.000008527059,0.9971527,0.00005382734,0.0026554444,0.000023275552,0.000001925891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012527854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00911055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012527854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001309214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010041432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024909854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4353094034","doi":"10.1016/j.qref.2023.03.006","title":"Satiation, habit formation, and other temporal anomalies: Extending the choice theory to multiple neighborhoods of time","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"Royal Roads University","keywords":"Habit; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Preference; Time preference; Set (abstract data type); Revealed preference; Taste; Choice set; Certainty; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Welfare economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06348378303080629,"score_gpt":0.3409173135543807,"score_spread":0.27743353052357445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4353094034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5112351,0.0040136827,0.46139333,0.0072683156,0.00032813835,0.000051824787,0.00038063584,0.0001389934,0.015189899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97217757,0.0013785509,0.023155509,0.000261951,0.00018515134,0.000038864422,0.00006552417,0.00002957721,0.0027072243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992962,0.00026945915,0.000034883597,0.00022058995,0.00009696581,0.00008190702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99166346,0.0050160694,0.001571498,0.000913533,0.00043251453,0.00040282274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002383475,0.00034631533,0.001163771,0.0007496936,0.00056704594,0.00224872,0.0012040462,0.0012821008,0.0027055691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012594244,0.00033907592,0.0012728428,0.0009542256,0.0028399767,0.0057038357,0.0016883686,0.001890386,0.00013840485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034907673,0.00016315834,0.02002353,0.00015712138,0.00030667847,0.00025327495,0.00058738684,0.047796782,0.0019341001,0.873124,0.0011917589,0.054113116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026363763,0.000055637567,0.0069905506,0.000016153466,0.000041975094,0.000063495936,0.000121081575,0.100847915,0.00021990629,0.8903901,0.0011913558,0.000035600195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048569473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00329421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048569473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000976128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008001522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012605131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362470251","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0282876","title":"The reference dependence roots of inaction inertia: A query theory account","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Inertia; Loss aversion; Work (physics); Point (geometry); Economics; Focus (optics); Discounting; Econometrics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.29994342934063767,"score_gpt":0.38210448504601985,"score_spread":0.08216105570538218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362470251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54914075,0.0011112933,0.2988459,0.008903786,0.00010798561,0.00014497015,0.0003340971,0.0002658206,0.14114536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98961115,0.00017696487,0.007790046,0.00025149644,0.000057859685,0.000031181928,0.000065951725,0.000034622717,0.0019807154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985688,0.0003735079,0.00008406529,0.000323958,0.0004563301,0.00019338696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887172,0.0058864364,0.0014705942,0.0018293683,0.0013543027,0.0007421476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028036854,0.00030946362,0.00050041004,0.0012393538,0.00074882753,0.0037320321,0.0012829786,0.0011112283,0.009649694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016092014,0.00036720687,0.00072885084,0.0013766511,0.0047344044,0.009249411,0.0023788195,0.0020503104,0.00064101827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017653542,0.00011416151,0.010292012,0.00009780147,0.000029992005,0.0002957148,0.007703948,0.0019689573,0.0025794867,0.9469271,0.0013659702,0.028448442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009007185,0.00014081583,0.017576093,0.000064314816,0.000073499505,0.00041299948,0.002314819,0.037356135,0.0012537558,0.9331801,0.0074672913,0.00007000108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031262005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015399563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009649694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001851566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089613587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03228146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362563190","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4406177","title":"Who Will Like Me? Individual Differences in the Sources of Meta-Liking Judgments at Zero-Acquaintance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Zero (linguistics); Psychology; Meta-analysis; Social psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.2184026690568351,"score_gpt":0.3777045001599617,"score_spread":0.1593018311031266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362563190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968009,0.00007226887,0.0003941878,0.00009564642,0.0000072359794,0.000006429335,0.00012710331,0.000014088527,0.0024820745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99888736,0.000031179607,0.00021766326,0.000027166048,0.00000814875,0.000004024421,0.00012430914,0.000015371757,0.00068485434],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993936,0.00017996803,0.000029137975,0.0001787544,0.00014136796,0.00007705153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786517,0.013715965,0.0028653408,0.0023059708,0.0011660493,0.0012949129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019080407,0.0002600959,0.0006230174,0.00080416637,0.00039166858,0.0019261333,0.00044801805,0.00095008075,0.009194006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018094746,0.00038226933,0.00034040064,0.00070453924,0.00043943204,0.0013379017,0.0008052388,0.0016752763,0.0010194941],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004035487,0.000931393,0.8946531,0.0001721306,0.0008104664,0.00050247763,0.011904215,0.0012612387,0.03058936,0.0027885768,0.0014878353,0.05086378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029932295,0.0001277443,0.9922975,0.000016051608,0.00013109032,0.00016424623,0.0010722735,0.0019897276,0.0011365797,0.0026304221,0.00036845013,0.000035875615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003583284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003904727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009194006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002598453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020668343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03075707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362730598","doi":"10.3819/ccbr.2023.180002","title":"Theoretical Mechanisms of Paradoxical Choices Involving Information","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative cognition; Psychology; Animal behavior; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Neuroscience; Cognition; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.3607511729184733,"score_gpt":0.47583913722168936,"score_spread":0.11508796430321605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362730598","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068899736,0.042494938,0.67947763,0.021799471,0.0007999436,0.00016785039,0.0005149101,0.0004395959,0.18540594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82141244,0.023837924,0.1328655,0.0024276988,0.0010980752,0.00057077134,0.000269295,0.00019977144,0.017318472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849,0.00059574266,0.00009153949,0.00025136312,0.00041709217,0.00015431528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499524,0.0034481178,0.00050022645,0.0005128744,0.00035824516,0.00018540514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034572654,0.0008895845,0.00087934436,0.0017040872,0.0011463598,0.003080583,0.0027583556,0.0029969949,0.008182777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008343887,0.0006126641,0.0015202067,0.0011408785,0.0062091933,0.0063317684,0.002210366,0.0029376643,0.0009986917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063915995,0.000010714087,0.00011015645,0.000097406315,0.000013068865,0.000079822916,0.00012153619,0.0026821054,0.00023712516,0.99318695,0.0005775673,0.0028772624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064803185,0.000006697002,0.00007523099,0.00002826279,0.0000057808675,0.00006501244,0.000015986076,0.0074325963,0.00007278542,0.99039173,0.0018896043,0.000009766642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011650465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007663074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008182777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025899496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012404739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027374089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362738479","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500004873","title":"Limited resources or limited luck? Why people perceive an illusory negative correlation between the outcomes of choice options despite unequivocal evidence for independence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Luck; Independence (probability theory); Psychology; Correlation; Negative correlation; Social psychology; Medicine; Statistics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20895790583398827,"score_gpt":0.42773231928231853,"score_spread":0.21877441344833026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362738479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850246,0.0001750792,0.0069544003,0.0004746111,0.00002317701,0.000016039616,0.00004638155,0.000044769717,0.007240904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987676,0.000029643978,0.00087469595,0.00012540355,0.0000065757345,0.000008295607,0.000020581658,0.000008259531,0.00015907695],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822086,0.0006037237,0.00012672515,0.00036138057,0.0005219982,0.00016524654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839851,0.009116152,0.0033480893,0.0019259898,0.0008637002,0.00076099904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037020417,0.00031556262,0.00050536863,0.0005142642,0.00029405864,0.0013660288,0.00043234474,0.0010282192,0.0043274383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030626617,0.0004956807,0.00036943954,0.00020128397,0.0023345484,0.0024911074,0.0014783392,0.0016054553,0.00031948247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008523228,0.0010234093,0.59280694,0.0014849937,0.0010573146,0.0014978189,0.020384092,0.0077389837,0.18382113,0.045928977,0.004085609,0.13164762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038298604,0.0014156457,0.82799864,0.00028445612,0.0003214086,0.0012269891,0.0077494723,0.020567713,0.017769465,0.117189735,0.004776875,0.00031670608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067579426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006401635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043274383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032953636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017142044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019578516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365143226","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105451","title":"The paradoxical effects of time pressure on base rate neglect","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Neglect; Psychology; Base (topology); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Mathematics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.07666941855958741,"score_gpt":0.3720754682145374,"score_spread":0.29540604965495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365143226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9609589,0.0017637634,0.0050296187,0.004452805,0.00024172601,0.00001984068,0.00021330743,0.000050260605,0.027269768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978498,0.00040244457,0.00061295455,0.00036225692,0.00012254906,0.000008273249,0.000035662448,0.000022107362,0.0005839504],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929357,0.00026945514,0.00004635739,0.00009234165,0.00022623157,0.0000720929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9514508,0.040994287,0.002593559,0.0024859777,0.0007517602,0.0017236344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003161717,0.00038708147,0.00059995713,0.0006486474,0.00038037883,0.0016176114,0.0006702844,0.0012432028,0.012122178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056410294,0.00033623708,0.00037994882,0.0005030634,0.001546382,0.0021932765,0.0013408713,0.0022548663,0.00041292072],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.052806225,0.006609153,0.17577404,0.0016442722,0.0010689148,0.005541566,0.004714589,0.043841057,0.11450031,0.24969229,0.011755381,0.33205226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012616176,0.0016583904,0.43049523,0.00016468969,0.0004729104,0.0024489048,0.00101063,0.023363514,0.00688549,0.52785337,0.004227529,0.00015780021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016603249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095597096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012122178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048105002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007425737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040552735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365519323","doi":"10.54254/2753-7048/3/2022450","title":"A Study of Weight Management Based on Intrinsic Incentives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Honor; Intrinsic motivation; Control (management); Public economics; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Management; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.097325633729937,"score_gpt":0.43440880664847487,"score_spread":0.33708317291853784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365519323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98507637,0.00020181709,0.007701642,0.00057706266,0.000079831814,0.00031110417,0.00006347308,0.0000131512315,0.0059755784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881292,0.00021920489,0.008036305,0.0003749687,0.00006527031,0.0003714681,0.000040230778,0.000009140212,0.002754307],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975829,0.0016294366,0.00007250104,0.00025401462,0.00033894804,0.00012219713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98511654,0.011337852,0.0014998964,0.00088323664,0.00035751166,0.00080500334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042012064,0.00039659333,0.00054207206,0.00032251028,0.00048753124,0.0009405652,0.00044932935,0.0006364008,0.0046412535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012709477,0.0002578586,0.00040671031,0.00021657586,0.0010892085,0.00092399865,0.00052167085,0.00090400386,0.00030305315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05065048,0.11520816,0.20141275,0.0027197509,0.0015476898,0.0006047506,0.0038389894,0.017773667,0.16928414,0.1458737,0.00217213,0.2889139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011538467,0.15070501,0.58059585,0.00040942407,0.0014928832,0.00053871877,0.0023366855,0.079390615,0.04991706,0.10371168,0.018966615,0.0003969578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005611941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036855592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046412535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047484637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005931273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022218347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366086793","doi":"10.3846/tede.2023.18551","title":"NONPARAMETRIC NUMERICAL APPROACHES TO PROBABILITY WEIGHTING FUNCTION CONSTRUCT FOR MANIFESTATION AND PREDICTION OF RISK PREFERENCES","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technological and Economic Development of Economy","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China; City University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Weighting; Nonparametric statistics; Construct (python library); Function (biology); Econometrics; Computer science; A-weighting; Mathematics; Statistics; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.30294977102701076,"score_gpt":0.31691030689014743,"score_spread":0.01396053586313667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366086793","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057798475,0.00006141749,0.9922105,0.000078986115,0.000009647802,0.000037871578,0.00004307818,0.00005714616,0.0017215273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32130876,0.00044941818,0.67465186,0.00009774331,0.000054863496,0.00081487175,0.00028147455,0.00007354083,0.0022673926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514836,0.0030881986,0.00025268018,0.0006242519,0.0007303612,0.00015613949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98795986,0.008676432,0.0009628778,0.0012076239,0.0010479407,0.00014523105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069674267,0.0010512983,0.00064655347,0.0022757568,0.00055759406,0.002061929,0.0017263794,0.0011012444,0.005093121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032124255,0.00041975212,0.0012441315,0.0024721492,0.0017648276,0.004013391,0.0017168681,0.0021168897,0.000593194],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086890526,0.00013621752,0.004154773,0.00025775767,0.000081780614,0.00017861063,0.0008711626,0.14493519,0.0030299737,0.7198295,0.0013570931,0.12508115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011215416,0.000066078486,0.0016162551,0.00005633599,0.000018434946,0.00010256479,0.0001478273,0.64854646,0.0010724948,0.34509256,0.0032209845,0.000048819824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017909262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012008946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069674267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011749498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011094449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03684771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366115122","doi":"10.1561/105.00000169","title":"Rationality and Emotionality Interplay and Economic Contributions: A Neuroeconomics Experiment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Behavioral Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroeconomics; Rationality; Emotionality; Psychology; Economics; Positive economics; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12316385771438725,"score_gpt":0.473738574037869,"score_spread":0.35057471632348175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366115122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99685526,0.000015878106,0.0013911686,0.00009928731,0.000011988843,0.00013427244,0.000038366856,0.000005042591,0.0014486897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949988,0.00003257576,0.0033975933,0.00011658412,0.000012013923,0.00048582206,0.000048157726,0.0000045895426,0.0009039754],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993149,0.00031263795,0.00005192283,0.00015672504,0.00009543598,0.00006842307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974113,0.0014149463,0.000442749,0.0002652412,0.00011060388,0.00035515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016009072,0.00041706662,0.0002891661,0.00015494175,0.00046075738,0.0008252949,0.00038996132,0.0007311232,0.002961536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054115895,0.0002498609,0.0002230405,0.00008523727,0.0013236016,0.00060524704,0.0010483084,0.0009089339,0.0002533684],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04330807,0.075594984,0.23458375,0.000971982,0.00090624345,0.0016346474,0.014575214,0.02260561,0.44457936,0.05183516,0.0035524752,0.105852515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010657549,0.07762316,0.57889843,0.00013725352,0.00075348606,0.0015503895,0.0064562983,0.09113577,0.07862361,0.1373682,0.01639819,0.00039772206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035612122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038067467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002961536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036525296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003167339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009907365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366489390","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1354","title":"Mental accounting of product returns","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mental accounting; Product (mathematics); Lottery; Purchasing; Economics; Revenue; Value (mathematics); Monetary economics; Business; Fungibility; Time value of money; Microeconomics; Marketing; Accounting; Finance","score_opus":0.2204257693242787,"score_gpt":0.5006127997533809,"score_spread":0.2801870304291022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366489390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9638701,0.00016736209,0.008212603,0.0006092691,0.0000373059,0.000054730852,0.000095330215,0.000089060966,0.026864259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878925,0.000026011843,0.00079681416,0.000036926485,0.0000064815445,0.0000059452705,0.000033586086,0.000008323905,0.00029681777],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790144,0.0008211671,0.000118334756,0.0002267913,0.00076313346,0.0001690713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97791195,0.009291637,0.0056884554,0.0049965098,0.0013950847,0.0007163742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022548866,0.0004794279,0.0002963883,0.0009629573,0.0005629878,0.0023939528,0.00075543835,0.00066451886,0.0060091754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03527005,0.0002633593,0.00040393835,0.00057710876,0.0020075773,0.0028148512,0.001648071,0.0012450288,0.00022537573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003118416,0.0016278811,0.3806493,0.0009718947,0.00048657408,0.0010610311,0.008864119,0.014114003,0.046485912,0.14543602,0.0040782485,0.3931065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001646692,0.001547264,0.7162547,0.0002524582,0.00040471627,0.0009629746,0.0046373764,0.07047397,0.017656213,0.17887439,0.008505069,0.00026627776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022678669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012669867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060091754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011476852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005670383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02010262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366963360","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4427474","title":"Selten's Horse an Experiment on Sequential Rationality∗","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Horse; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Economics; Philosophy; Biology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.24655878919601093,"score_gpt":0.46377665526933753,"score_spread":0.2172178660733266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366963360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4860543,0.0011210982,0.2201155,0.031144666,0.0021479195,0.0009881437,0.0019254871,0.00080982654,0.25569305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94655704,0.00033587875,0.031946022,0.001905416,0.00052978646,0.0005698884,0.00017403354,0.0001455882,0.017836336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99113256,0.0060745785,0.00044392215,0.0007640511,0.0011674067,0.0004174467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92290556,0.063942015,0.0020617642,0.008743712,0.0012232119,0.0011237907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012992865,0.0007963584,0.0018683474,0.0006659618,0.0015100446,0.002522589,0.0013027262,0.0029710312,0.024318086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06923298,0.00046825662,0.0009546498,0.0008255092,0.0045484235,0.0068660444,0.0022830477,0.003054276,0.0010215689],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013145766,0.00020469833,0.00060955004,0.00019404823,0.00009468165,0.0000667415,0.00035723246,0.0026404466,0.0009981968,0.97082585,0.0069527337,0.015741175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006169157,0.0002845924,0.00051610585,0.000031225598,0.000035943696,0.000042324005,0.000093590665,0.01069665,0.00067945337,0.98123735,0.005742883,0.000023005567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010858166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065775646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024318086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001249356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015957601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081352174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367554874","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/3f5nh","title":"When Half is At Least 50%: Effect of “Framing” and Probability Level on Frequency Estimates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Government of Canada; Mercyhurst University","keywords":"Framing effect; Framing (construction); Psychology; Numeracy; Bounding overwatch; Statistics; Cognition; Inference; Social psychology; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Persuasion; Geography","score_opus":0.27520398021952475,"score_gpt":0.42046077545699595,"score_spread":0.1452567952374712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367554874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881734,0.00023363718,0.0051740417,0.00026363277,0.00006993031,0.00007248988,0.000087544875,0.000051679806,0.005873571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99495584,0.000071641414,0.004219027,0.00013981473,0.000034623776,0.00007213806,0.00007618309,0.000032579854,0.0003981305],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891583,0.0075501483,0.00059033424,0.0012250916,0.0011092058,0.00036702977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.55646473,0.42130038,0.011678324,0.007307966,0.0018211021,0.0014274787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016276201,0.00047200217,0.000633885,0.00048069176,0.000452508,0.0018434549,0.00050415954,0.001054268,0.0041765184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14955907,0.00038440054,0.0004489973,0.0002721917,0.0012573387,0.0016336301,0.0010278946,0.0016033868,0.00032406798],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07094493,0.004977877,0.42670682,0.0017354441,0.0017982792,0.0013022834,0.02141688,0.02446496,0.14841707,0.018901706,0.0033071379,0.2760266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012270419,0.008988848,0.8601589,0.00043370348,0.0016344481,0.0007234161,0.004582771,0.041629415,0.034072757,0.0393023,0.006728282,0.0005181058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012824837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096689846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016276201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047719516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003461772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08607775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375934455","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x22002746","title":"The wisdom in the story: Clarifying assumptions about radical uncertainty and reasonableness in narrative judgment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Irrational number; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.2434699376193632,"score_gpt":0.43891038566082125,"score_spread":0.19544044804145805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4375934455","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00095061207,0.00084939256,0.00053734914,0.9933357,0.0015540677,0.0000044814897,0.000011537644,0.0000068026743,0.0027500775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09273869,0.0032009317,0.0022120883,0.8818907,0.015381163,0.000081345286,0.000025707468,0.000028456685,0.004440859],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99311674,0.004493444,0.0004271286,0.0006030762,0.0009721267,0.00038744073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9145219,0.0760155,0.0017939967,0.0021848737,0.003874833,0.0016089106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014498544,0.00037289268,0.0009611744,0.0006302984,0.003907651,0.0051288283,0.002473075,0.034050424,0.0041472954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08578145,0.00037939468,0.0006218852,0.00052807154,0.01732125,0.01111777,0.0025463607,0.035872426,0.0023865472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043129086,0.000070592265,0.0013693186,0.00016410062,0.000040255953,0.0056580226,0.005045606,0.00048375974,0.00041363898,0.34875968,0.5924928,0.045070868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015960826,0.00006856892,0.0009665011,0.0004531816,0.000018004195,0.0028772284,0.002951952,0.0027135962,0.00036148605,0.76818615,0.22115546,0.00008833878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052611195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006727624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034050424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00610499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038705985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07667655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375934458","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x22003223","title":"Narratives, probabilities, and the currency of thought","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Narrative; Currency; Centrality; Cognition; Positive economics; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Monetary economics; Neuroscience; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.23046363334700126,"score_gpt":0.4444988259929796,"score_spread":0.2140351926459783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4375934458","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18862379,0.0123273665,0.057292134,0.59815794,0.004682843,0.000160077,0.00066702766,0.00014331118,0.13794541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99217355,0.0012166413,0.0013137012,0.0037413589,0.0005716717,0.00003400969,0.00002712068,0.000027105503,0.0008948588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96632695,0.026935952,0.0015306054,0.0013109085,0.0030634464,0.00083208247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69097114,0.27358943,0.016074352,0.005752378,0.011538417,0.002074238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033892497,0.0005704233,0.0005327082,0.00275239,0.0039485786,0.008462226,0.0015401007,0.0041361027,0.0061763898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16133137,0.0004421401,0.00037019953,0.0025870833,0.028539073,0.017008565,0.0056989943,0.0061761844,0.00039103214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022660577,0.000014142937,0.0020083026,0.0006117499,0.000039870636,0.0006655003,0.0945163,0.0007619088,0.00046591787,0.87974834,0.010627355,0.010313907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007016148,0.00005111585,0.0032644835,0.0025458857,0.000039605715,0.00047486468,0.1089933,0.00301815,0.001019132,0.7161746,0.16422147,0.00012730034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002421544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011663208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033892497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053526256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028749628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17924279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378717534","doi":"10.3390/jcm12113740","title":"Clinical Assessment of Judgment in Adults and the Elderly: Development and Validation of the Three Domains of Judgment Test—Clinical Version (3DJT-CV)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-Pinel; Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches; Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal; Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal; Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal; Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale; Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal; Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Concurrent validity; Test (biology); Medicine; Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Clinical judgment; Cognition; Applied psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychometrics; Internal consistency; Clinical psychology; Cognitive psychology; Medical physics; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Computer science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.2473022152251285,"score_gpt":0.5221287755712625,"score_spread":0.27482656034613395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378717534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97462714,0.000885573,0.013732279,0.0005851176,0.00014747743,0.0022051411,0.0010608634,0.00014516,0.0066113435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496992,0.00066232466,0.04404872,0.00031151608,0.00007520867,0.0021145944,0.0020031952,0.000021329899,0.0010639351],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722433,0.0010585805,0.0006534859,0.00020334875,0.0007329829,0.00012727619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99302304,0.0027047517,0.0012347224,0.0004788347,0.0019362775,0.00062237034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047879363,0.00040242326,0.00050888845,0.0011267875,0.00039919597,0.00092163775,0.00046347798,0.0008339122,0.0015654615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022126684,0.00016027922,0.0008429194,0.0005785385,0.0004976995,0.00090009416,0.0012122968,0.00088308624,0.0005935167],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011922221,0.0016796889,0.6774301,0.0005350433,0.00017336568,0.0005412211,0.0030678543,0.0020582883,0.005940389,0.0011494787,0.007237123,0.29899526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003332048,0.0036303333,0.96412945,0.00033569345,0.00007750484,0.00367893,0.0018207727,0.008702768,0.0037726765,0.0033361944,0.010056197,0.00012632503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013104485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023643451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047879363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005461934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015162453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025321305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380079881","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/ravsp","title":"Nudges for People who Think","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Response Biomedical (Canada)","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Nudge theory; Metaphor; Choice architecture; Cognition; Psychology; Agency (philosophy); Cognitive science; Psychological intervention; Cognitive psychology; Balance (ability); Social psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.3343739601529925,"score_gpt":0.46697911083793725,"score_spread":0.13260515068494477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380079881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19508496,0.007207889,0.24581285,0.16167997,0.00246206,0.00021054657,0.00021644341,0.0013967835,0.3859285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9205191,0.0012703688,0.03968754,0.008087056,0.0005094644,0.00018601379,0.000089538975,0.00023788758,0.029413031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446154,0.0034061829,0.00022205742,0.00070396485,0.00091185136,0.0002944615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883029,0.005269719,0.0015439161,0.0031556108,0.0007824379,0.0009454836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072297268,0.00055715203,0.0004027844,0.0012165688,0.0021104729,0.0071033933,0.00080724544,0.0031315952,0.011485985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018448884,0.00036312905,0.00048764673,0.0006262473,0.018805657,0.012157908,0.0046420684,0.0037708946,0.002427251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067915826,0.00006677177,0.002238608,0.00011583342,0.000023490138,0.00017099376,0.02360001,0.00021232697,0.0013414322,0.9364515,0.007891067,0.027820008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028646804,0.000044964625,0.0011013582,0.00011491266,0.000015673026,0.0002953134,0.0063897413,0.0009984518,0.00073470327,0.83382034,0.15642479,0.00003115981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000515456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005350408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011485985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012960532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087063375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038424492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380371887","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/7ru58","title":"Pre-decisional information search adaptively reduces three types of uncertainty","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria; Max-Planck-Gesellschaft; Saskatoon City Hospital Foundation; Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Fundación BBVA; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Computer science; Task (project management); Information seeking; Selection (genetic algorithm); Information needs; Data science; Information retrieval; Machine learning; World Wide Web; Economics","score_opus":0.31863190425034527,"score_gpt":0.44562220596521945,"score_spread":0.1269903017148742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380371887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96913826,0.00021160897,0.026639292,0.0002864954,0.000005620911,0.000046921698,0.00007631615,0.000050160692,0.0035452335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936884,0.000053925254,0.0057959775,0.00003047027,0.000004756852,0.00002693265,0.00006851308,0.0000097484535,0.0003214089],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724245,0.0012002733,0.0001796024,0.00059620396,0.0004781835,0.00030326398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9639336,0.027586056,0.0033290007,0.0034305954,0.0007832311,0.00093746744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004875621,0.0003146605,0.0007500066,0.0007508941,0.0005442677,0.0029138292,0.0008841829,0.00088210276,0.0026962352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04622645,0.00040349193,0.00072623,0.00075346837,0.0020079308,0.0034547136,0.0017706831,0.001406716,0.0002470312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038702693,0.0011373765,0.42378655,0.0008345758,0.0010014413,0.0006345628,0.010124196,0.14214255,0.017175028,0.15753368,0.0019023772,0.23985742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028930485,0.0012275047,0.28031576,0.00013945698,0.00035905663,0.0004666406,0.0038245884,0.40685776,0.011525541,0.28990126,0.0048002363,0.0002928829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016666616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018885506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004875621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073706394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070208136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025785029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380997685","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2023.2220971","title":"Verbal and numeric probabilities differentially shape decisions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Vagueness; Cognitive psychology; Nonverbal communication; Outcome (game theory); Social psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Developmental psychology; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.11305609871285237,"score_gpt":0.3700312167534983,"score_spread":0.25697511804064593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380997685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858407,0.00010782773,0.0028260536,0.00019305648,0.000030028152,0.000029286039,0.00007207269,0.000032365657,0.010868617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975122,0.00006854433,0.0017298457,0.00007700314,0.000014088326,0.0000229809,0.00006171646,0.00002426281,0.00048938754],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668807,0.0018192766,0.00018132635,0.0005302471,0.000588082,0.00019304575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96405,0.03018959,0.0030994934,0.0010923224,0.00091107213,0.00065744936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003303578,0.00035776498,0.00034399095,0.00047766117,0.00035145535,0.002831855,0.00034806528,0.0009800288,0.006359155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04682963,0.00032073187,0.00038265984,0.00032351882,0.0009512419,0.0018421429,0.0010040685,0.000977873,0.00059607736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020081833,0.001972979,0.40012088,0.0014465457,0.0006836828,0.0016672543,0.027613813,0.01890558,0.2557642,0.030927787,0.0044122706,0.23640324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009643816,0.0024566345,0.77274734,0.00039111657,0.0008205531,0.00084642024,0.008120743,0.04878816,0.043892436,0.110444635,0.010169527,0.0003580228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006923424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007800199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006359155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000464594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029486997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021273494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381616548","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/azp37","title":"Rare and extreme outcomes in risky choice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Rare events; Outcome (game theory); Actuarial science; Psychology; Sample (material); Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.43401020526417283,"score_gpt":0.4620397567998276,"score_spread":0.028029551535654784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381616548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.872297,0.000923904,0.09129299,0.0026522386,0.000079329664,0.00006853152,0.00015103693,0.000063742074,0.03247116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99204284,0.00021468825,0.006448872,0.00013591866,0.0000281275,0.000037459995,0.000026813404,0.000011085388,0.0010541433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960168,0.00263541,0.00011929765,0.00042420946,0.000533479,0.00027075573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9727781,0.022114178,0.0023151136,0.0011476447,0.0004905245,0.0011544909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006701533,0.0004099657,0.000750072,0.00077055854,0.0007155897,0.0025434557,0.0004720461,0.0012195278,0.007908492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035798244,0.00039546413,0.000643321,0.00065305864,0.0041053807,0.0031010397,0.00244479,0.0026588899,0.00042823845],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010345074,0.0004684213,0.05155145,0.0002961594,0.00019061877,0.0005183631,0.0030307577,0.08302446,0.002195211,0.7951215,0.0019192253,0.060649335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074249634,0.00015230852,0.020234765,0.00007722037,0.000034550107,0.00014316988,0.00053220475,0.04995812,0.00031221146,0.92698574,0.001442011,0.000053503016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016034875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001606733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007908492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009517664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004782202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035441518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382244648","doi":"10.11647/obp.0361.03","title":"Preferences under uncertainty","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.3407427498451363,"score_gpt":0.4178540672739322,"score_spread":0.0771113174287959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382244648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02385142,0.008162241,0.12621088,0.010511792,0.00040041297,0.000054502634,0.00052810024,0.000109666806,0.830171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.776257,0.013912735,0.043669302,0.0027453469,0.0008868222,0.00014869212,0.00057143014,0.00010523519,0.16170347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942833,0.00025187517,0.000015906571,0.000067226014,0.00019014422,0.00004643838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999466,0.00034234166,0.00003197612,0.00007340874,0.00004733847,0.00003900051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007543525,0.00051787606,0.0004145113,0.00027980414,0.00068213843,0.0028168971,0.0004365374,0.0010913705,0.012646545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025355865,0.000233995,0.00037870774,0.0006820487,0.0014069545,0.0028918628,0.0008758774,0.0022983907,0.0020332963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073955275,0.0000094979105,0.00004759052,0.000019578909,0.0000048853585,0.000030637562,0.00016098622,0.0021011457,0.00013314304,0.98376554,0.0052042427,0.008515395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003152474,0.000008968683,0.00009075394,0.000029254954,0.000002597332,0.000074164935,0.00008280074,0.0030794193,0.00006411062,0.95986646,0.03669343,0.000004911823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006473338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062724605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012646545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009157075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004785725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04230696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382244795","doi":"10.11647/obp.0362.03","title":"Preferences under uncertainty","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3407427498451363,"score_gpt":0.4178540672739322,"score_spread":0.0771113174287959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382244795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02385142,0.008162241,0.12621088,0.010511792,0.00040041297,0.000054502634,0.00052810024,0.000109666806,0.830171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.776257,0.013912735,0.043669302,0.0027453469,0.0008868222,0.00014869212,0.00057143014,0.00010523519,0.16170347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942833,0.00025187517,0.000015906571,0.000067226014,0.00019014422,0.00004643838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999466,0.00034234166,0.00003197612,0.00007340874,0.00004733847,0.00003900051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007543525,0.00051787606,0.0004145113,0.00027980414,0.00068213843,0.0028168971,0.0004365374,0.0010913705,0.012646545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025355865,0.000233995,0.00037870774,0.0006820487,0.0014069545,0.0028918628,0.0008758774,0.0022983907,0.0020332963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073955275,0.0000094979105,0.00004759052,0.000019578909,0.0000048853585,0.000030637562,0.00016098622,0.0021011457,0.00013314304,0.98376554,0.0052042427,0.008515395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003152474,0.000008968683,0.00009075394,0.000029254954,0.000002597332,0.000074164935,0.00008280074,0.0030794193,0.00006411062,0.95986646,0.03669343,0.000004911823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006473338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062724605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012646545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009157075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004785725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04230696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382999365","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4499212","title":"Rationalization of Indecisive Choice Behavior By Pluralist Ballots","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalization (economics); Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.12201261400958437,"score_gpt":0.41605233779714745,"score_spread":0.2940397237875631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382999365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61885947,0.00022806908,0.28430757,0.0060217534,0.00011814996,0.0002140148,0.0001848974,0.00018934115,0.089876786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815564,0.000087434564,0.012882906,0.00018317155,0.00006787549,0.000085709085,0.0000362396,0.000037333633,0.0050629578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933228,0.0034136302,0.00028578143,0.0010963792,0.0010739691,0.000807472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721505,0.019069565,0.0026369735,0.0035176598,0.001460439,0.0011648556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072963582,0.000499169,0.0014546008,0.0008513611,0.0017381965,0.00483579,0.0016282969,0.0024574075,0.010224479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03836974,0.00071490434,0.0011929685,0.0008699487,0.0044098557,0.005384218,0.002939352,0.003431068,0.0006988022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035315816,0.00014095684,0.0020539125,0.000087593326,0.00007133045,0.0001475493,0.00080885785,0.018938962,0.0012752844,0.963967,0.0010223758,0.011132914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004735471,0.000038226764,0.00078306557,0.000010691693,0.0000110591445,0.00003667051,0.00017027296,0.06637631,0.00035292684,0.9315707,0.00058771996,0.0000149887865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001830555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016861116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010224479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001974928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016729566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038587272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384297663","doi":"10.1177/00222437231190851","title":"The Agent's Impatience: A Self–Other Decision Model of Intertemporal Choices","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Intertemporal choice; Interpersonal communication; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Psychology; Value (mathematics); Economics; Dynamic inconsistency; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.3637555493676284,"score_gpt":0.5272688989097731,"score_spread":0.16351334954214475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384297663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7681588,0.0003774195,0.17166635,0.0034905334,0.00008179385,0.00019723835,0.00012501032,0.000060977658,0.055841994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98953885,0.00011587097,0.007342233,0.00010371987,0.0000130132885,0.000052016683,0.000027334743,0.000008071955,0.0027988642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986212,0.00089547614,0.000032774435,0.00018816369,0.0001420456,0.00012037401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966666,0.0021271019,0.00047934474,0.00025760793,0.00017090146,0.00029855812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025994368,0.0006532198,0.0005471423,0.0005721963,0.00063394144,0.0026034638,0.0009884796,0.0010291149,0.0046324963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006514017,0.0003021856,0.0010588856,0.00043198242,0.001813684,0.0023107468,0.0010578376,0.0016721244,0.00052517693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012270643,0.0015316488,0.039381713,0.0001902333,0.0004194309,0.0008304629,0.005259059,0.19575445,0.004368953,0.70172405,0.0020742286,0.04723856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017322312,0.0005095002,0.01354714,0.000034044075,0.00013417867,0.00033004343,0.00092877675,0.6993004,0.00042713401,0.28193933,0.0026042329,0.00007194742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002712767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002313675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046324963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016276203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006800979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015497267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384572568","doi":"10.1214/23-ba1397","title":"Defining a Credible Interval Is Not Always Possible with “Point-Null” Priors: A Lesser-Known Correlate of the Jeffreys-Lindley Paradox (with Discussion)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bayesian Analysis","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Prior probability; Mathematics; Interval (graph theory); Mathematical economics; Point estimation; Applied mathematics; Null (SQL); Bayesian probability; Econometrics; Statistics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Data mining","score_opus":0.04654015112076346,"score_gpt":0.33527572829360824,"score_spread":0.2887355771728448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384572568","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01052759,0.0109699005,0.9053515,0.0275832,0.0013892264,0.00009374091,0.00025572593,0.00020206274,0.04362697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6196654,0.006526047,0.35645285,0.009175333,0.0034842447,0.0007303649,0.0002587296,0.0003369206,0.0033701013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9399135,0.03675117,0.0032874898,0.009170801,0.00994554,0.00093143404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70603025,0.2441534,0.0139974,0.023418486,0.010650768,0.0017497469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.064185336,0.0010139128,0.0026912012,0.00348404,0.003355229,0.009472161,0.0043992046,0.0071523795,0.0062237717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28711572,0.00096044305,0.0017973953,0.0038548652,0.0273763,0.017001064,0.005999522,0.013149334,0.0012451498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016226108,0.000008967362,0.00025283673,0.00010375557,0.000036018457,0.000069435875,0.00056892744,0.00088544923,0.000094421885,0.98617923,0.0016930148,0.01009171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012460775,0.000010153383,0.00020324766,0.000116335264,0.000010842516,0.00018400831,0.00014884672,0.001668898,0.00014979999,0.99261934,0.004843276,0.00003276471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014133757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010787818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064185336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003017829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002366447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33944857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384625931","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x22003089","title":"Not feeling right about uncertainty monitoring","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Saskatchewan Health Authority","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Metacognition; Process (computing); Dual (grammatical number); Dual process theory (moral psychology); Psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Cognition; Social psychology; Philosophy; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.2751635275266549,"score_gpt":0.4442015482417352,"score_spread":0.16903802071508028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384625931","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008888638,0.0019219444,0.0011060237,0.9873361,0.0037266538,0.000004593967,0.00001987049,0.000020751655,0.004975292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05527394,0.0025530155,0.0010910541,0.92448115,0.011550229,0.00004211576,0.000020947566,0.000031510623,0.0049559604],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949327,0.0025160932,0.00037601576,0.00082816015,0.0009975506,0.00034947938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9536265,0.03798076,0.0016340206,0.0018343113,0.0037113342,0.001213073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071851085,0.00034617787,0.000767031,0.0004361421,0.00203145,0.0030609085,0.0013986336,0.019271282,0.0040847478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05853366,0.00026972487,0.0005641295,0.00034151977,0.006510367,0.0064961216,0.0015319248,0.03556142,0.0031862431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017104147,0.00005522094,0.0018030286,0.00015365402,0.000066427674,0.0017145122,0.002010695,0.0002714974,0.00038804888,0.16859436,0.7255349,0.09923651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015894571,0.000064185275,0.0016004612,0.00059129426,0.000040408475,0.003845467,0.00141204,0.0021635003,0.0007005106,0.43772128,0.5516058,0.000096020536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003527127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039956165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019271282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002979851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024521472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037998915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384626377","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x22002904","title":"A good architecture for fast and slow thinking, but exclusivity is exclusively in the past","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Architecture; Process (computing); Function (biology); Dual function; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Thinking processes; Psychology; Work (physics); Epistemology; History; Engineering; Philosophy; Mathematics education; Linguistics; Programming language","score_opus":0.1688517641540118,"score_gpt":0.40508308594803993,"score_spread":0.23623132179402814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384626377","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024298392,0.0025685998,0.058063827,0.8970033,0.007516466,0.00003244881,0.00007908087,0.0005655073,0.03174087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31829527,0.0036698035,0.07066012,0.52996385,0.025416588,0.0003939284,0.0001387788,0.00062421977,0.050837427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955123,0.0014878161,0.00030038794,0.0010851856,0.0012998837,0.00031448275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98408127,0.0073104794,0.0010269617,0.004787743,0.001860274,0.00093320804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067680716,0.00064762967,0.00083398336,0.000589445,0.0024100866,0.0041864146,0.0020704938,0.01227926,0.008486463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025002684,0.0004855345,0.0008143143,0.0003880661,0.019082412,0.0168676,0.0034585586,0.022872506,0.0053497907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017599553,0.000039883456,0.0007215025,0.000112621135,0.000029725117,0.00054700085,0.00094313966,0.0004086986,0.000688029,0.8069569,0.14260548,0.046770982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057353973,0.000035764166,0.00029450198,0.00008593871,0.000011289145,0.0010163113,0.00023037488,0.0014508086,0.00049021235,0.8167395,0.17954786,0.000040184972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014600403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019407847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01227926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024982102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002148302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035793424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384626957","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x2200303x","title":"Correction, uncertainty, and anchoring effects","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Anchoring; Heuristic; Psychology; Noise (video); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.16981545685415336,"score_gpt":0.4181655745018714,"score_spread":0.24835011764771805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384626957","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008944217,0.0031429643,0.004006425,0.96390134,0.0041430197,0.0000151516215,0.00004756432,0.000040153263,0.015759254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45276505,0.005298187,0.0045397193,0.49886775,0.027649438,0.00013793197,0.0000691029,0.000054374817,0.010618402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970534,0.0008958814,0.00024537486,0.0005891513,0.0009183984,0.00029780963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94208694,0.048866276,0.0023812053,0.002839122,0.0029811105,0.0008453292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007396713,0.00026928782,0.00063157117,0.0005223555,0.0010970525,0.0019413595,0.0013177138,0.010863112,0.007297156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058716122,0.00016209974,0.00038947962,0.00048478853,0.004665891,0.003580765,0.0015806486,0.009386545,0.0018680709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012511451,0.00019902471,0.010253413,0.00025060182,0.00008483213,0.008335948,0.0010755019,0.0011721955,0.0014602712,0.43563443,0.34358057,0.19670202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003721032,0.0001554704,0.007156367,0.0001958512,0.000042767657,0.006675988,0.0007006895,0.005110836,0.0017423702,0.8635014,0.11426192,0.000084202904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019193727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020828915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010863112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018982087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012660144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03911805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384756320","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2307.08542","title":"Anticomonotonicity for Preference Axioms: The Natural Counterpart to Comonotonicity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Axiom; Ambiguity; Mathematical economics; Preference; Expected utility hypothesis; Ambiguity aversion; Mathematics; Risk aversion (psychology); Variation (astronomy); Subjective expected utility; Arbitrage; Econometrics; Economics; Computer science; Financial economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.49324705576098443,"score_gpt":0.47168622251699655,"score_spread":0.021560833243987887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384756320","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07018843,0.0013399682,0.82291275,0.009951957,0.00050447625,0.000119150995,0.0005717456,0.00027013317,0.0941414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.821936,0.001108874,0.16683465,0.0026528987,0.00080844894,0.00025118227,0.00039441447,0.00012665484,0.0058868355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930062,0.0027936301,0.0007477589,0.0014275558,0.001627145,0.00039756717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798269,0.011320705,0.0018207125,0.003401153,0.0030145363,0.0006159329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00768644,0.0006076901,0.0009506748,0.0012453153,0.0018319495,0.0030456018,0.0013780134,0.002339457,0.006008213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020791385,0.0005595733,0.001634356,0.0016857972,0.009529904,0.009961781,0.0026477694,0.005027247,0.0006741359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003850749,0.0000070237015,0.00008472496,0.000016268263,0.0000041117232,0.000022314147,0.000072720555,0.00026282723,0.000115069466,0.9969171,0.000319291,0.0021746436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000092772925,0.0000110232895,0.00012107795,0.000011278028,0.0000046942673,0.00006627739,0.000044144617,0.0021601054,0.00019596277,0.99416006,0.003205795,0.000010336439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002032597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017430403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00768644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018599656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021339566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04065025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384827856","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/apc26","title":"The robustness of mental accounting: a global perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Mental accounting; Accounting; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Business; Computer science; Actuarial science; Artificial intelligence; Biology","score_opus":0.2367439942955789,"score_gpt":0.4664540749030524,"score_spread":0.2297100806074735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384827856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9177002,0.0056829015,0.023599379,0.0030153552,0.00037584864,0.00016659386,0.0017497565,0.000118715034,0.04759128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99701726,0.00029900143,0.0016646263,0.00016577008,0.000080357044,0.000039300092,0.00040093245,0.00005107517,0.00028168363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9761928,0.013899777,0.0015831749,0.004936273,0.0024460691,0.0009418828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76684093,0.14826548,0.018391876,0.054721884,0.010071678,0.0017080965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03868126,0.0008902602,0.0011897444,0.004997502,0.0012210505,0.0047798385,0.0011968691,0.00076117023,0.0075169816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12946557,0.0003043805,0.0016546383,0.004950146,0.0062214783,0.005190424,0.005796519,0.0016270386,0.0006307975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016306161,0.00017716113,0.7477085,0.0018449296,0.00846369,0.000702183,0.017408896,0.005063341,0.004465955,0.06168577,0.0020926099,0.14875634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017008647,0.0011943544,0.85022527,0.001205402,0.0046216683,0.00089841674,0.014208628,0.0040455135,0.00862675,0.09258542,0.022011768,0.00020672799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031897302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016654251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03868126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008094249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009314242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20456845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385191668","doi":"10.3758/s13421-023-01439-x","title":"Option similarity modulates the link between choice and memory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Encoding (memory); Variable (mathematics); Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.21608904997014555,"score_gpt":0.4073662493391805,"score_spread":0.19127719936903492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385191668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995713,0.00014285975,0.0011495404,0.00016520136,0.000036576403,0.0000085225965,0.000076322984,0.000013708121,0.0026941777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983773,0.00007756779,0.00061288563,0.00007240394,0.000021139262,0.000008270584,0.000097524884,0.00001989903,0.0007128815],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938536,0.00017137566,0.00005246328,0.00018488643,0.00012365972,0.00008226726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99169403,0.005187301,0.0012628967,0.0008783005,0.00025023604,0.0007271877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001044885,0.0002497599,0.00063826126,0.00034825882,0.00022370434,0.00231225,0.00059531623,0.0010840285,0.0080315275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013442489,0.00045964448,0.00026869052,0.00032316308,0.0005697086,0.0018822413,0.0010903048,0.0011323376,0.0005426037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.036758553,0.0054467577,0.21218146,0.0009324482,0.0011641894,0.0010991263,0.0020679731,0.00825439,0.5307914,0.027362367,0.0034076746,0.17053369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011156468,0.0035620434,0.8229133,0.00010934825,0.0005024611,0.00094398356,0.0006579499,0.038622685,0.02915063,0.10000203,0.0022494758,0.00017043028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005871125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000612479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0080315275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003196598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034309842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026868105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385269243","doi":"10.1101/2023.07.20.23292967","title":"Delay Discounting and Family History of Psychopathology in Children Ages 9-11: Results from the ABCD Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Delay discounting; Psychopathology; Discounting; Psychology; Family history; Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology; Impulsivity; Medicine","score_opus":0.1798392415251144,"score_gpt":0.3907426400221034,"score_spread":0.210903398496989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385269243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993704,0.00005609911,0.000013067033,0.00002401711,0.0000020087907,0.000005257291,0.00035688945,0.0000010075119,0.00017134825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99931693,0.000063678985,0.000049896193,0.000013348196,0.000002624303,0.0000106488715,0.00043036207,0.0000015155659,0.00011102391],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995573,0.00010920317,0.00006879014,0.00009689,0.00010379367,0.00006405498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567527,0.0008815247,0.0020291375,0.0003185115,0.000426871,0.0006686231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010953884,0.00025628775,0.0003748078,0.0009694873,0.00048405782,0.0007228643,0.00039045216,0.00037150865,0.0012557451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004963705,0.00027692012,0.0005839438,0.0009321203,0.00032167538,0.00038402292,0.00065870216,0.0011027424,0.0001623265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002343362,0.00002794257,0.99926597,0.000004123031,0.0000141179,0.0000353488,0.00019728504,0.000011186929,0.000026951462,0.0000072367793,0.000048102385,0.00033830994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018621881,0.000026681573,0.9995202,0.0000035691548,0.000007845004,0.00009105299,0.00022643417,0.000029774046,0.000018022107,0.0000051025345,0.00006805326,0.0000014785732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019986872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019895572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019986872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042479145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003176063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03974104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385450060","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4526931","title":"Eliciting Stopping Times","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09845034831975613,"score_gpt":0.4005181453126801,"score_spread":0.30206779699292396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385450060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92712986,0.0001513546,0.06638096,0.0000837191,0.00003492825,0.00016822464,0.0003568043,0.00023876023,0.0054554055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97853345,0.000097831486,0.019101795,0.00003165111,0.000012925838,0.00011439449,0.00033925433,0.000033495464,0.0017352155],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991374,0.00032762508,0.000063962456,0.00017623891,0.00019688584,0.00009786055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99045146,0.007420773,0.00072580227,0.0006179132,0.00049641717,0.00028772707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013068614,0.00051584386,0.0005331308,0.00058026094,0.00033621027,0.0010030704,0.00037772433,0.0010402704,0.004123044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0104677575,0.00028234968,0.00029034182,0.0005210837,0.00021171733,0.00066541816,0.00055957196,0.0007840486,0.0008349045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00410702,0.0013340524,0.026076926,0.00089183904,0.000095056945,0.0004432482,0.0012135558,0.033237442,0.757811,0.016917083,0.0012689334,0.15660387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002742198,0.0033672387,0.034465276,0.000107952605,0.00013056326,0.0005713068,0.00045216334,0.36896667,0.5595416,0.027596647,0.0044112992,0.00011510931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025517715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005056387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004123044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045937576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043330155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013792932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385698187","doi":"10.1287/moor.2022.0317","title":"(No-)Betting Pareto Optima Under Rank-Dependent Utility","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics of Operations Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Generality; Pareto principle; Ambiguity; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics; Mathematical economics; Aggregate (composite); Weighting; Rank (graph theory); Matching (statistics); Preference; Probabilistic logic; Econometrics; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Microeconomics; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.5542620435669947,"score_gpt":0.5590239752768249,"score_spread":0.004761931709830192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385698187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5474824,0.0006263093,0.4263257,0.0015005486,0.000024954894,0.0000973778,0.00040846303,0.00016207247,0.023372201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731174,0.00033792402,0.021901127,0.00010706812,0.000028904766,0.00009850745,0.0001019645,0.000029043034,0.0042779627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983966,0.00082165765,0.00007784497,0.00023075064,0.00017019662,0.00030291534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99316794,0.004548409,0.0011650024,0.0003820189,0.00031946582,0.00041724733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004582489,0.000908124,0.001384827,0.00078190456,0.00054809666,0.00279126,0.0009517446,0.0013488162,0.0033136508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014259845,0.0006568513,0.0010006011,0.00068555964,0.0020882275,0.003435992,0.0014457372,0.0012872411,0.0004250195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002225514,0.00010200306,0.001987799,0.00014318453,0.00009941,0.00028285384,0.0002509408,0.23830794,0.0012522355,0.74589056,0.0012468017,0.01021376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050856965,0.000059311413,0.0009029084,0.00003773689,0.000022247976,0.000091507434,0.000098865785,0.40422642,0.0004741982,0.5935341,0.0004737613,0.000028139368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000996761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073125353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004582489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015266081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008036378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024234831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385839849","doi":"10.1007/s42113-023-00178-1","title":"Humans Adopt Different Exploration Strategies Depending on the Environment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Brain & Behavior","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Task (project management); Heuristic; Probabilistic logic; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Reinforcement learning; Computer science; Machine learning; Trait; Contrast (vision); Softmax function; Cognition; Flexibility (engineering); Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Deep learning; Engineering","score_opus":0.26391598024537366,"score_gpt":0.4076021962323015,"score_spread":0.14368621598692782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385839849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9408676,0.0005374653,0.039574407,0.00055699673,0.000028587325,0.000022333412,0.00008144268,0.00007093294,0.018260095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99039614,0.00028895578,0.0076760952,0.0001204215,0.000010113749,0.000014174561,0.000054181306,0.000027173752,0.0014126581],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997445,0.00008849205,0.0000107895585,0.00005563571,0.000047828475,0.000052726347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990835,0.00045649114,0.00015097264,0.00008681486,0.00010179474,0.00012036589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005006858,0.0003182352,0.0002074922,0.00033879656,0.00014968318,0.0017323078,0.0002654704,0.00063107617,0.0021976493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028564075,0.00023470084,0.0002688999,0.00021757264,0.0005156369,0.0010935226,0.00046597596,0.0004581526,0.00051647064],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014895593,0.0008898705,0.23634179,0.00047069727,0.0011451936,0.00086750556,0.0020641969,0.0821553,0.13331231,0.15291025,0.005457919,0.38289544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001980777,0.0009311705,0.35046265,0.000141887,0.00034503304,0.001727415,0.0022583217,0.2303067,0.023473494,0.380186,0.009721433,0.0002478321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003086457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000524106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021976493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015807647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021168665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0073518753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386271874","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x23000857","title":"Nudges, regulations, and behavioral public choice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nudge theory; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.3885912200096558,"score_gpt":0.4611049836902284,"score_spread":0.07251376368057261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386271874","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00085240154,0.0009904088,0.00017298722,0.9923775,0.0010728935,0.00000403783,0.000011778272,0.0000069960133,0.0045110425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.054452386,0.0020112565,0.00049726473,0.92839974,0.007983686,0.00005176318,0.000015814756,0.000012874752,0.0065751662],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637705,0.0018885843,0.00020168714,0.00042523164,0.0007037536,0.00040374897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95950896,0.035384983,0.0011326923,0.001033431,0.0017503749,0.0011894328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008147116,0.0003758033,0.000869189,0.00054266345,0.003379608,0.0033306407,0.0014548857,0.04320585,0.009029542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035209373,0.00027697504,0.0007213304,0.00044322628,0.010811965,0.0037446716,0.0013476446,0.025843665,0.0029472795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022481325,0.00015455006,0.0035591016,0.000096754615,0.000035015277,0.001122605,0.00067887467,0.00038531024,0.0002598986,0.19950469,0.7553491,0.038629293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037022438,0.0001404357,0.00493493,0.00036152845,0.00004767379,0.0012093075,0.0013835614,0.0029783123,0.00076459086,0.48780036,0.4998974,0.00011169508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008732587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016137619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04320585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00467273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002842999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04308659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386578390","doi":"10.1093/jeea/jvad036","title":"Past and Future: Backward and Forward Discounting","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the European Economic Association","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing, University of California Berkeley; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Zhejiang University; Queen's University; Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Regret; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Time preference; Economics; Discounting; Consumption (sociology); Dynamic inconsistency; Set (abstract data type); Preference; Hyperbolic discounting; Microeconomics; Positive economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04201173345269537,"score_gpt":0.31921471735623425,"score_spread":0.27720298390353887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386578390","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3930184,0.0038487087,0.52726763,0.011015481,0.00042517364,0.000094151976,0.0012418908,0.00019986108,0.06288872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97572553,0.0011896918,0.0110211605,0.0002663213,0.00012863493,0.000031097316,0.00015386251,0.000035051857,0.01144874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913317,0.00036297026,0.000036643974,0.00017174237,0.00015284977,0.0001426975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994228,0.0036767018,0.0008129302,0.00046729157,0.00036295445,0.00045216767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038870438,0.0007180893,0.00092037674,0.0006803394,0.00060182106,0.0032138254,0.0017744125,0.002210852,0.0074639777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015582161,0.0007766374,0.0013167263,0.0008514565,0.0018390303,0.0055148993,0.0013673096,0.0032979036,0.0006599737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027542657,0.00008068546,0.0031235078,0.000081204205,0.00008937158,0.00030580806,0.00035525748,0.20154859,0.00051269215,0.7832664,0.0011798494,0.00918128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074872754,0.000077295685,0.0011679562,0.000047854035,0.00008690836,0.0002135384,0.00009490709,0.3731578,0.00021042245,0.62231094,0.0024993056,0.000058333877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010655496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006016123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010655496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026086546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001318943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024969518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386639396","doi":"10.54254/2754-1169/13/20230670","title":"Behavioral Economics: The Decoy Effect","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Nudge theory; Decoy; Behavioral economics; Consumption (sociology); Revenue; Prospect theory; Economics; Marketing; Consumer behaviour; Public economics; Advertising; Psychology; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Business; Sociology; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.07883848371310988,"score_gpt":0.4260058056611917,"score_spread":0.34716732194808186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386639396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16889453,0.0401799,0.22806934,0.06675312,0.0021390356,0.0006890327,0.0014205095,0.00044682293,0.4914076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94931805,0.009140116,0.0142818885,0.013083163,0.0011145878,0.00051155547,0.00016347085,0.00015169174,0.012235459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901202,0.0054035364,0.00033841745,0.0016943051,0.0019965316,0.0004471296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9483366,0.039373484,0.0055705877,0.0039780904,0.0021008714,0.0006404174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012696387,0.0007909615,0.0013705995,0.0017635302,0.0012920807,0.0034890103,0.0011652125,0.002899978,0.0147518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035883665,0.00044568765,0.001314058,0.0017742908,0.011226545,0.006477413,0.0030017577,0.004667357,0.0009451534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016798572,0.00012609152,0.014798282,0.00060495886,0.00028641522,0.00012460041,0.0006819867,0.0019811997,0.00041536163,0.93253976,0.004376193,0.043897104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010560218,0.0002597247,0.032600746,0.0007751523,0.00023443125,0.00021399834,0.00076181634,0.0049239784,0.00059753744,0.9040115,0.05542886,0.00008669483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00412304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032613627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0147518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043872893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001951199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067145705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386641068","doi":"10.54254/2754-1169/11/20230513","title":"The Anchoring Effect and Related Applications: Cognitive Inertia and Habitual Thinking","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Anchoring; Subconscious; Irrational number; Psychology; Tian; Cognition; Limiting; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Mathematics; Engineering; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.03533087621799814,"score_gpt":0.3795166858489186,"score_spread":0.3441858096309205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386641068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90198827,0.0016466089,0.055688955,0.0012117932,0.00010858896,0.00024671838,0.00016726725,0.00014844771,0.03879337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99356174,0.00023178675,0.005402117,0.00012290993,0.00007425227,0.00007591429,0.000053879576,0.00001818034,0.0004591821],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959901,0.0017390354,0.00034695136,0.0007919654,0.0009179747,0.00021393632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8170951,0.14436671,0.018686842,0.0118716555,0.005688415,0.002291346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008366596,0.00043765616,0.0005718689,0.0022989595,0.0005181318,0.001960535,0.0008033093,0.0009827787,0.0042225034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08700328,0.00033633033,0.00085684884,0.0019411212,0.0039163134,0.0038142672,0.0015703246,0.0017143094,0.00025777996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013382336,0.0015292454,0.54532886,0.0010559342,0.0007984475,0.0007583142,0.014419297,0.008899366,0.011034317,0.17306292,0.0013199215,0.24045515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001194807,0.0007633012,0.7168628,0.0002603074,0.0002973011,0.00068136473,0.0020608818,0.022997944,0.0033211326,0.24937542,0.0030542256,0.00020589243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012521578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076373725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008366596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008501448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006399015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04424733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386686232","doi":"10.54254/2754-1169/15/20230878","title":"Loss Aversion and Protectionism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Loss aversion; Economics; Prospect theory; Protectionism; Grossman; Behavioral economics; Microeconomics; Empirical research; Risk aversion (psychology); Commercial policy; Positive economics; International economics; Financial economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.06986783919150553,"score_gpt":0.3896250657973704,"score_spread":0.31975722660586486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386686232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48553395,0.0124541065,0.072292924,0.018713908,0.00039562417,0.00014355029,0.00022245986,0.00007164627,0.4101718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917173,0.0016570278,0.0017502577,0.00087680586,0.00015131097,0.000024322222,0.000022290802,0.000005915217,0.0037948086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979225,0.000988396,0.00008813506,0.00027959354,0.00045202332,0.0002693732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99379224,0.0032438266,0.0015385739,0.00055484957,0.00043870724,0.0004319035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030447245,0.00034531858,0.00035306613,0.00085659616,0.0008502797,0.0021379113,0.00037086074,0.0011091168,0.0050452366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00813289,0.00015134382,0.00046583207,0.00063837384,0.0050526746,0.0017385499,0.0019078121,0.002059943,0.00029390614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016291451,0.00019611121,0.018363914,0.00025631566,0.00012031905,0.00037689082,0.0022415847,0.0029307196,0.0016190012,0.9105585,0.0023473152,0.060826283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041454554,0.00024177312,0.023447393,0.0001907979,0.00006760539,0.0008449598,0.0012983206,0.0029226565,0.00075712166,0.93945163,0.030693581,0.00004265006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053152966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038674966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050452366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010926881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006339605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016878009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386928383","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/y2fdh","title":"Probabilistic models of delay discounting: improving plausibility and performance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Probabilistic logic; Range (aeronautics); Econometrics; Statistical model; Delay discounting; Mathematics; Regression; Series (stratigraphy); Computer science; Statistics; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.28239138885275744,"score_gpt":0.3993078294059782,"score_spread":0.11691644055322076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386928383","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060283866,0.0014274358,0.9318879,0.0015077575,0.000102162754,0.00004747513,0.00021390035,0.00071854604,0.0038110141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8119232,0.0016299981,0.18141104,0.00034442733,0.00027338325,0.000088139794,0.0003302251,0.0003030761,0.0036964575],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607,0.0022451265,0.00015608645,0.00081387337,0.00051396235,0.00020094738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9437771,0.043423977,0.0049357065,0.005038447,0.001972174,0.0008526586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0113048395,0.002099812,0.002486615,0.0014094602,0.0008259282,0.004435999,0.004243185,0.0024277614,0.003890485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072904065,0.0013759178,0.0018242811,0.0020628565,0.0019203649,0.009345046,0.0034279076,0.005819921,0.00077301206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032439452,0.00010816999,0.0017264016,0.0001137468,0.0001355192,0.00007073222,0.00018319738,0.8127662,0.0007545683,0.14080074,0.0010517658,0.041964605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013113647,0.00001962548,0.00012299145,0.00001139291,0.00001663066,0.000013858514,0.0000046621494,0.9441872,0.00015002064,0.055212703,0.0002323749,0.00001540855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010412146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005674792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0113048395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003190611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016586524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05978644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386967128","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2023.2259548","title":"Open-minded and reflective thinking predicts reasoning and meta-reasoning: evidence from a ratio-bias conflict task","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Critical thinking; Analytic reasoning; Task (project management); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Semantic reasoner; Verbal reasoning; Numeracy; Dual process theory (moral psychology); Reflection (computer programming); Social psychology; Confirmation bias; Debiasing; Epistemology; Mathematics education; Moral reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.2915215675014313,"score_gpt":0.4302327762172313,"score_spread":0.1387112087158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386967128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997895,0.000057898367,0.0010912641,0.000036476642,0.000003722424,0.000013388802,0.000060697632,0.000008864712,0.0008327186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975535,0.00005131376,0.0017917686,0.000039594346,0.0000065956415,0.000023387058,0.00019318998,0.0000133494195,0.00032742624],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975452,0.0009807069,0.00029316597,0.00045284268,0.0006012404,0.00012690038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92700577,0.047036145,0.014768201,0.0072205355,0.0016345411,0.0023347028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007648526,0.00054238865,0.0004701949,0.0008864445,0.0002686749,0.0024042113,0.0006880839,0.00082994974,0.0025222818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04955568,0.00053519715,0.00054288335,0.00043770706,0.0007818301,0.0021018083,0.0016563311,0.0013146132,0.000490914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038120474,0.003408859,0.93705255,0.00016580301,0.00072166027,0.00021336967,0.0031262557,0.0023950604,0.016893916,0.0016367548,0.00042444837,0.030149164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015857746,0.0009943895,0.9669438,0.000043491385,0.00016337393,0.0005348387,0.00043278205,0.0143439695,0.008868483,0.0067497175,0.0006903284,0.00007610791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067731756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007672251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007648526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000204908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002505159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04044974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387186156","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197541302.013.10","title":"Perceiving Threat","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.2017885427189906,"score_gpt":0.325604451188001,"score_spread":0.12381590846901042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387186156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20705637,0.014631625,0.020400925,0.01752015,0.0009915768,0.000041396626,0.000254921,0.00012389905,0.7389791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644042,0.0071188835,0.0035579144,0.0026687093,0.00029577818,0.000027753626,0.00018060551,0.000056501856,0.021689508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989808,0.00043750516,0.00002143397,0.000091062364,0.00038735569,0.00008178792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985061,0.0008673569,0.00018236392,0.000072060706,0.00023068728,0.00014135939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009761508,0.00036851325,0.00021154321,0.0007899623,0.0006774763,0.00542067,0.00041038703,0.0013795977,0.0079146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045353672,0.00013906113,0.00018912446,0.00043465578,0.0029564197,0.0037056082,0.0014912338,0.002235363,0.00094663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011800979,0.0000829322,0.017885065,0.0005400999,0.000043571028,0.0006224289,0.16809374,0.0012687297,0.010193228,0.6036164,0.03167275,0.16586293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013528809,0.00017636557,0.03567729,0.0015407309,0.00004214945,0.001572841,0.107974,0.002757617,0.002545019,0.34590906,0.50167745,0.00011395056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012321984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094702566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0079146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008039553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041330428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02647698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387894662","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2361","title":"Preference for quicker offers: The critical roles of temporal reference points and evaluation mode","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Preference; Mode (computer interface); Point (geometry); Salient; Feeling; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Psychology; Joint (building); Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Human–computer interaction; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.39145312597477916,"score_gpt":0.524278844454063,"score_spread":0.13282571847928387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387894662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97937894,0.00065131806,0.005592282,0.00041367064,0.00003687523,0.000044884448,0.0000533228,0.000026583875,0.01380204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963869,0.0001697219,0.0027651133,0.000082097584,0.000022311575,0.000022048083,0.00003353327,0.000021445418,0.00049679255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658656,0.00207139,0.00020070598,0.00027971822,0.00069221616,0.00016944423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93533605,0.05107534,0.0066468227,0.0029277594,0.0021400242,0.0018740009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0084899785,0.00025387836,0.00032753558,0.0006726839,0.00052140286,0.003426418,0.00056605664,0.00097345654,0.00958845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056287996,0.0003383534,0.0003655881,0.0006001956,0.0010388165,0.0031571954,0.0010485931,0.0014316365,0.0004346046],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017724385,0.002960516,0.5251743,0.0019246804,0.0011403903,0.0019922105,0.036839865,0.008328849,0.046490937,0.07763503,0.004028218,0.2757606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007337621,0.003019761,0.8472342,0.00064930425,0.00065536384,0.0011430478,0.019982805,0.016715147,0.007443937,0.08917467,0.012825615,0.0004222916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008654292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014001683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00958845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005388978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040763256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04489982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387898335","doi":"10.1111/caje.12687","title":"Random choice and market demand","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irrational number; Economics; Outcome (game theory); Preference; Rationality; Consumption (sociology); Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Expected utility hypothesis; Choice set; Revealed preference; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.28457399598492716,"score_gpt":0.2783140668538818,"score_spread":0.006259929131045339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387898335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5555452,0.0012745225,0.3451825,0.018103583,0.00018019172,0.00014204576,0.00066274987,0.00017593568,0.07873321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927569,0.00021688578,0.003301866,0.00017338141,0.000054348384,0.000051921743,0.00006279572,0.000011596494,0.0033703581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975096,0.0015703416,0.000051290463,0.00026831514,0.00032906403,0.0002714298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98462796,0.011726597,0.00158317,0.0007772855,0.00085053145,0.00043446547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040913345,0.0003232013,0.00093065336,0.0006532114,0.00042725945,0.0017585233,0.0010004424,0.001661935,0.0058072046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016962761,0.0002998041,0.00053317903,0.0007341369,0.0025057073,0.0028400116,0.0007882201,0.0012646556,0.0004994241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008094433,0.00006393143,0.0022047302,0.00004392083,0.000037885275,0.000104304556,0.00009337717,0.082116,0.0003020505,0.9097937,0.0013917047,0.003767452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042845542,0.00005588427,0.0011959277,0.000015133766,0.000007290215,0.000050420345,0.000076046534,0.3304039,0.00011685109,0.6667844,0.0012279875,0.00002329461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023775243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015459954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058072046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020752028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083867327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02163732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388070086","doi":"10.3758/s13414-023-02811-4","title":"Correction to: Salience matters: Distractors may, or may not, speed target-absent searches","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.17809435624331948,"score_gpt":0.4350421604422192,"score_spread":0.25694780419889973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388070086","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000967723,0.00029504413,0.0004729243,0.046403952,0.9462936,0.000022664823,0.0024369017,0.0005199799,0.0034581425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017444812,0.0036563983,0.007057638,0.1089498,0.4263002,0.00032926892,0.0063503725,0.0042467904,0.42566478],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957504,0.00052859064,0.00085034803,0.0007538693,0.0016179455,0.00049881946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9521827,0.012141671,0.0021317212,0.004311013,0.026817987,0.002414906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036052263,0.00302944,0.0028035026,0.004051647,0.0047030817,0.0055418434,0.0047397665,0.009977873,0.1610412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08869339,0.0015530606,0.0019170493,0.0030794966,0.0033664717,0.0034248661,0.0023178824,0.014931036,0.107062094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028748935,0.0000053322888,0.000044898967,0.000047483543,0.0000070127253,0.000084647996,0.000011501553,0.000024407398,0.000019693272,0.00044314686,0.9968059,0.0024771225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015243125,0.00002503654,0.001958708,0.0004115895,0.000051108596,0.00044562685,0.000121725054,0.0004977802,0.0005269745,0.0050015976,0.9907284,0.00007904071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04211595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042667862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1610412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050800755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067864885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53873646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388206746","doi":"10.11606/t.12.2023.tde-23102023-212133","title":"Essays on finance and decision theory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Economics; Political science; Positive economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09943322505724449,"score_gpt":0.42469677009286677,"score_spread":0.32526354503562227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388206746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01749355,0.21899651,0.032985736,0.20793433,0.0113317715,0.00007399461,0.0006668098,0.00010558892,0.51041174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5398919,0.20149563,0.015220504,0.025665779,0.031498443,0.00029999053,0.00082244806,0.0001459135,0.18495946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990527,0.00043115974,0.000054994885,0.00010685507,0.0002678858,0.00008644513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994764,0.0043272157,0.00021621908,0.00016416969,0.0003597232,0.0001687921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021005995,0.00082850334,0.0006396088,0.001522523,0.0012344809,0.0029248458,0.00060629466,0.0021497193,0.012443927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072816457,0.00019958768,0.0005685629,0.0017252308,0.0048624193,0.0028599764,0.0008234253,0.0027635796,0.0019411894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021500557,0.000043313357,0.00035302466,0.00015508995,0.000013371164,0.000052171792,0.00048278758,0.0012550281,0.00006453795,0.90445155,0.0675236,0.025584012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016629489,0.000020208412,0.0006364296,0.00034925982,0.0000044269177,0.000056750858,0.00029393478,0.0010548232,0.0000324012,0.7482804,0.2492469,0.0000077986715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014892635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092744676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012443927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030343581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001738573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041629076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388632251","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1157527","title":"A normative theory of luck","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Warwick; York University","keywords":"Luck; Normative; Psychology; Generality; Ambiguity; Heuristics; Cognitive psychology; Quality (philosophy); Social psychology; Cognition; Epistemology; Positive economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.12761496705165554,"score_gpt":0.44197947211023875,"score_spread":0.3143645050585832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388632251","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08086272,0.002025054,0.48955733,0.029364362,0.0005336798,0.00015936086,0.00042059174,0.00022125381,0.39685562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9570216,0.00065048045,0.032524794,0.0021196022,0.00040239113,0.00027276942,0.000135017,0.00007462878,0.0067986967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902546,0.00425884,0.00057336455,0.0014648968,0.0027321104,0.0007162551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779162,0.01199545,0.0020643622,0.0029756853,0.0041874778,0.0008609133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011822142,0.00060896185,0.0006822476,0.0021291848,0.0015758586,0.005889681,0.0012055604,0.0021254434,0.0040091695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03141664,0.00034525074,0.00074913586,0.0013814515,0.018025078,0.0076785083,0.0023616347,0.003213891,0.00075090013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007876686,0.0000076321985,0.0005197513,0.000019359239,0.0000059793656,0.000017622902,0.00020277427,0.0007730395,0.000054827087,0.9950578,0.0005151275,0.0028181365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005616167,0.000009254516,0.00036671656,0.000028830933,0.0000032902524,0.000039353094,0.0000873983,0.001906861,0.0000775538,0.99347526,0.0039918874,0.00000798829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014261684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013366815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011822142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033280854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024808554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06252223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388677096","doi":"10.23952/asvao.5.2023.3.02","title":"Superiorization: The asymmetric roles of feasibility-seeking and objective function reduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Set-Valued Analysis and Optimization","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Israel Science Foundation; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Reduction (mathematics); Function (biology); Psychology; Mathematics; Biology; Evolutionary biology","score_opus":0.061918427671709124,"score_gpt":0.33868749447818397,"score_spread":0.27676906680647484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388677096","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022378117,0.00083021144,0.9863775,0.0011038576,0.000091975366,0.00007770213,0.000031577365,0.00014717596,0.00910212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16210105,0.002439746,0.82363,0.001188684,0.00052936055,0.00066275004,0.00019108756,0.0007657781,0.008491521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.987181,0.0063314317,0.0005763039,0.0018240089,0.0035381513,0.00054907013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803838,0.012321054,0.0012132972,0.003924473,0.0017607048,0.00039663905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016778305,0.0027052076,0.0027299114,0.0024342407,0.0016614557,0.0078933695,0.0034201904,0.0024797358,0.006955715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03221572,0.0014479671,0.0026109198,0.0022389947,0.0112558,0.009109594,0.008150014,0.0077018393,0.0015027534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000821246,0.00006635903,0.00029414773,0.00036233795,0.00007112879,0.00008142545,0.00034956934,0.040148035,0.0016103816,0.8968486,0.0020838864,0.05800201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000490281,0.00018048692,0.00020559401,0.00027909793,0.000051935283,0.00017249155,0.00011961228,0.15952623,0.0035082304,0.81573176,0.020097481,0.00007802576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018336262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013126758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016778305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034933216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005234644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088733196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388734940","doi":"10.3758/s13423-023-02415-x","title":"Rare and extreme outcomes in risky choice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Rare events; Psychology; Social psychology; Actuarial science; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.23799725236489147,"score_gpt":0.43989843817798496,"score_spread":0.2019011858130935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388734940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7177466,0.09311345,0.10914449,0.012515752,0.0004296326,0.00013682105,0.00020656329,0.000042764696,0.066663936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780716,0.01450279,0.005944241,0.000520411,0.00013920644,0.00003826933,0.00003907261,0.000006889901,0.00073749817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684733,0.002215353,0.000121263256,0.00021824283,0.00045162436,0.00014625983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985926,0.011170465,0.001392214,0.00039657627,0.00052030274,0.0005945065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005617748,0.0003031407,0.000647236,0.0008730769,0.00043891562,0.001793961,0.00045326605,0.00086463254,0.0025750336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02146625,0.00021546672,0.0005071597,0.0009364849,0.0037364832,0.0021774243,0.0013580692,0.001882289,0.00018625613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007122565,0.00031329168,0.05267846,0.0012567244,0.0003751986,0.0003101297,0.002339956,0.024460882,0.000972595,0.6202577,0.0024965967,0.2938263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050098122,0.00018489758,0.052934684,0.00064377685,0.00009282537,0.00029288896,0.00069981057,0.0114993565,0.00031379488,0.92388135,0.009341888,0.000064631895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015259839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002011388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005617748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001042389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005741929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029709876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388962153","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-44742-6_1","title":"Foundations of Decision","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in computational intelligence","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.587676120652198,"score_gpt":0.5460224639360919,"score_spread":0.0416536567161061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388962153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004231397,0.012147455,0.17551705,0.01532627,0.0010400553,0.00006747674,0.00046043345,0.00013499049,0.7910748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61164445,0.019528298,0.08904619,0.004000244,0.003732286,0.00049455644,0.00085714756,0.00021087717,0.270486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989184,0.00041019553,0.00004718294,0.00019559902,0.00032968246,0.000098901815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831724,0.0010550952,0.00008377795,0.00027005016,0.00020060962,0.00007321788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00135157,0.00081716664,0.00071611605,0.0011771596,0.0012415863,0.0050119013,0.0010963519,0.0019802274,0.021685792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003910954,0.00039727197,0.00054911507,0.001595224,0.0056718336,0.0046220687,0.0012933316,0.002640962,0.0043151365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010456638,0.0000043151676,0.000013704463,0.000010320046,0.000001550555,0.000004314353,0.000025368883,0.0002581213,0.000010131486,0.9922504,0.0027597896,0.004660995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012759358,8.615204e-7,0.000017989983,0.000008245406,8.338031e-7,0.000006022506,0.000010646806,0.0005758848,0.000011312378,0.98526865,0.014097211,0.0000011080617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027580762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018658441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021685792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029737966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018274602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072546184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389065490","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4616130","title":"Non-parametric Identification of Posterior and Reasoning Errors in Isolated and Social Environments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Parametric statistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Data science; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.03789352240665748,"score_gpt":0.34624339101094215,"score_spread":0.30834986860428465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389065490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8532857,0.00013152348,0.14364223,0.0002790011,0.000026244681,0.000066402186,0.0002127796,0.0001839681,0.0021722529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99111205,0.000059787053,0.0067099123,0.00002115131,0.000016588245,0.00003896039,0.0002602955,0.0000329371,0.001748259],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948761,0.0025472515,0.0002919001,0.0011828559,0.00048608493,0.0006158355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63294774,0.3448251,0.009760448,0.008530313,0.0024673594,0.0014690125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01654395,0.00081146293,0.0014485933,0.0012085554,0.00043432254,0.0031326595,0.0018197222,0.002086667,0.0067605875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16802898,0.0007677111,0.0012415283,0.0009284185,0.0016148061,0.0044181095,0.0031874706,0.0025514243,0.0006989614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007023546,0.0026771226,0.19828391,0.0005198493,0.0012411425,0.0011166773,0.004426859,0.51812595,0.0053748577,0.07833899,0.0019594177,0.18091162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009092276,0.00026515848,0.059340116,0.000041381278,0.000080174264,0.00022353255,0.00048019332,0.8732492,0.0014542739,0.06440591,0.0002869681,0.0000822364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033992652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027578808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01654395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061020046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010881237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08749384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389377762","doi":"10.1038/s41539-023-00206-6","title":"Deliberately making miskates: Behavioural consistency under win maximization and loss maximization conditions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"npj Science of Learning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Maximization; Consistency (knowledge bases); Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.17320499995748728,"score_gpt":0.41501985533792835,"score_spread":0.24181485538044106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389377762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99335164,0.000044975597,0.0040208944,0.00008851116,0.000018230696,0.000035362606,0.000076562195,0.0000335888,0.0023302068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974859,0.000016305043,0.0019443601,0.00006394973,0.000007012571,0.0000693958,0.000073289724,0.000021409245,0.0003183184],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.997092,0.0009236541,0.0003128634,0.0006133892,0.0007727531,0.00028539397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98693085,0.0062721735,0.0034486463,0.0018929082,0.0005455047,0.0009099678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002873368,0.00031201018,0.0005778546,0.00048578746,0.0002813656,0.0012955552,0.00045585984,0.0006760751,0.0019275877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02622928,0.00036788615,0.00019170839,0.0002264903,0.001207777,0.0011379215,0.0016776682,0.0012325798,0.00014739338],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013186109,0.0019045494,0.17424874,0.0006515531,0.00038279808,0.0004889366,0.0072737173,0.005273872,0.735222,0.01202952,0.00070312194,0.048635002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027652425,0.004337886,0.8656966,0.000090046866,0.0001512515,0.0010594476,0.002552306,0.025638135,0.06809604,0.02948439,0.0023674883,0.000249922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057161634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078731024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002873368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036188713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038919257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015195966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389545912","doi":"10.1038/s41598-023-49148-4","title":"Delay discounting and family history of psychopathology in children ages 9–11","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto; National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Mental Health; University of Toronto","keywords":"Delay discounting; Psychopathology; Discounting; Mania; Psychology; Family history; Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming); Clinical psychology; Bipolar disorder; Psychiatry; Developmental psychology; Impulsivity; Cognition; Medicine","score_opus":0.08593281216593533,"score_gpt":0.3639055371786013,"score_spread":0.27797272501266596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389545912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99967563,0.0000672374,0.00001518924,0.000026387908,0.0000017219667,0.0000014521587,0.00007284205,0.0000013910801,0.00013823745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996507,0.00008370127,0.000047494694,0.000006062501,0.0000017753234,0.0000020602736,0.00010649254,8.8583806e-7,0.00010078205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99980015,0.000043052474,0.00001946269,0.000044061755,0.000042874122,0.000050471837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973224,0.0004750717,0.0016324652,0.000111183384,0.000092865754,0.00036603407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063765905,0.00026503264,0.00019403658,0.0006497227,0.0002710409,0.0004938968,0.0002053941,0.00029026793,0.0013259989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003384568,0.0002766454,0.00035115864,0.00049636135,0.00032555498,0.0002775746,0.0002892306,0.0008673118,0.000107637294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037057638,0.000027498512,0.9989672,0.0000029061712,0.000009473606,0.00006447756,0.000116951895,0.00002949715,0.000061766004,0.000016582924,0.000031365256,0.00063539186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016589344,0.0000393323,0.99939716,0.0000047216968,0.000007157379,0.0002137511,0.00014699335,0.00007328261,0.00004611789,0.000019661116,0.00004823122,0.0000018797866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014373667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018779408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014373667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004686398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000333673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02858001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389765398","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3745806/v1","title":"Semi-Supervised Machine Learning Method for Predicting Observed Individual Risk Preference Using Gallup Data","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Random forest; Ordinary least squares; Regression; Index (typography); Covariate; Econometrics; Machine learning; Computer science; Actuarial science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.8533571027901891,"score_gpt":0.5883198959953995,"score_spread":0.2650372067947896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389765398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61943424,0.0005455862,0.37282312,0.00060441333,0.00012406848,0.000281341,0.003740473,0.0011942656,0.0012524833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9300515,0.00008916213,0.06423968,0.000084998006,0.00005793409,0.0002055139,0.0043815835,0.0000269953,0.0008625539],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983308,0.00087846344,0.00016191775,0.0003430775,0.00016050058,0.00012512572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98938584,0.007120615,0.0010237091,0.0010732907,0.0011434363,0.00025303575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038920618,0.000736138,0.0010928737,0.0017930783,0.00035741672,0.00069798384,0.0013252217,0.0011478099,0.0015294076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01156912,0.0002949048,0.001080971,0.0011966206,0.00045614174,0.00074298173,0.0007055259,0.0013067793,0.0006641529],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010881358,0.0012745943,0.11087868,0.00028928797,0.0005437859,0.0003289149,0.00030436734,0.6378786,0.002319349,0.0027917067,0.006458674,0.23584385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008044508,0.00003915146,0.0048375814,0.000010069244,0.000009272984,0.000019095514,0.000024311455,0.9930514,0.0003675355,0.0014324588,0.00019119651,0.000009940229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006243288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005813995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006243288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005626981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075183634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02058345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389841248","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2023.11.003","title":"Analyzing the interrelations among investors’ behavioral biases using an integrated DANP method","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loss aversion; Overconfidence effect; Regret; Anchoring; Preference; Econometrics; Herd behavior; Behavioral economics; Prospect theory; Psychology; Risk aversion (psychology); Disposition effect; Risk-seeking; Proxy (statistics); Ambiguity; Economics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Expected utility hypothesis; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Herding; Financial economics","score_opus":0.397188947689401,"score_gpt":0.5075228894466369,"score_spread":0.11033394175723593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389841248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83936495,0.0002553811,0.15516275,0.00021782119,0.000020814208,0.00032406425,0.0005856956,0.00008802896,0.003980524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93832326,0.00019393432,0.06027967,0.00001975711,0.0000127780395,0.00028837327,0.0003814218,0.0000054857915,0.000495367],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974087,0.0013908162,0.00016703001,0.0003188774,0.00059133646,0.00012332723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857124,0.010973619,0.0015288923,0.00063864584,0.0009979799,0.0001484484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041520502,0.0005036096,0.0005849325,0.0051887482,0.0003580248,0.0011465908,0.0004998611,0.0003593291,0.0015443637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023327965,0.0002011537,0.0006777162,0.0041702404,0.00036283542,0.001273708,0.0013153765,0.0006161683,0.00014246146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031064465,0.0002976696,0.7642799,0.00022997013,0.0006977254,0.00031039515,0.0021244443,0.014852663,0.0022490064,0.015516373,0.00051189587,0.19861929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052845124,0.00038681264,0.35828656,0.00014005737,0.000466263,0.000405167,0.0029140732,0.60066986,0.0024360348,0.03151257,0.0026609048,0.00006880213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029880237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002619989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051887482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007424191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078740256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021958351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390265114","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-50628-4_1","title":"Conversational Reasoning in the Absence of Quantity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Maxim; Grice; Implicature; Computer science; Numeral system; Meaning (existential); Scalar (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Utterance; Linguistics; Cooperative principle; Pragmatics; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12369875095763073,"score_gpt":0.3700944025334291,"score_spread":0.2463956515757984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390265114","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034230012,0.0020999417,0.79262584,0.012821058,0.0006829893,0.00016638859,0.00045225315,0.0006134316,0.15630807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7863201,0.001047216,0.19194278,0.0014545727,0.0008861226,0.0004089398,0.0007022584,0.00034901738,0.01688902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823712,0.011113456,0.0010841368,0.002144992,0.0022796234,0.0010065506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90039265,0.08892659,0.001800864,0.005756953,0.0021930009,0.00092999736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015421055,0.0010727987,0.0017847576,0.001861023,0.0031223986,0.010206612,0.003249795,0.0045376928,0.01418775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08600119,0.0018200835,0.00196208,0.0015451559,0.007883902,0.034270734,0.0065944307,0.006308574,0.002214132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074079835,0.000034618286,0.00019069025,0.000105822495,0.000029472656,0.00013443915,0.00083244895,0.0026243464,0.0004522212,0.985358,0.0017333874,0.008430475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013578286,0.0000054901748,0.000032746004,0.00001951017,0.000009614747,0.000041084368,0.00010502593,0.014370067,0.00021569578,0.9833557,0.0018214934,0.000010020855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002245704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012350684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015421055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023173862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020440628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08155525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390515501","doi":"10.2196/48954","title":"Designing and Validating a Novel Method for Assessing Delay Discounting Associated With Health Behaviors: Ecological Momentary Assessment Study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Formative Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse","keywords":"Delay discounting; Ecology; Discounting; Psychology; Biology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.38170836331185615,"score_gpt":0.6155761447913838,"score_spread":0.23386778147952764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390515501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6959599,0.00022542129,0.28700912,0.00026939804,0.0001760309,0.012723898,0.00085919694,0.00030366023,0.0024733888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5896379,0.00018527845,0.38689512,0.0003693272,0.000074093245,0.02170502,0.0004925177,0.000049662234,0.0005910503],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869533,0.008577651,0.0010835431,0.0012858419,0.0018049107,0.0002946065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97847635,0.010307882,0.0028080195,0.0031335223,0.0047167074,0.0005574203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030604895,0.0008192397,0.0006355979,0.0008618175,0.0006399375,0.0012458373,0.0010557722,0.0010168033,0.000982052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044596624,0.00050333655,0.001038444,0.00078087405,0.00077371736,0.000934146,0.0015389961,0.0011160674,0.00034084322],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020197455,0.008478881,0.65402764,0.000991319,0.0009801753,0.00026984053,0.005938541,0.0077974577,0.027943075,0.003008336,0.0029457381,0.28559926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021113378,0.02614804,0.8136834,0.0004546886,0.0009485756,0.0011146753,0.002502021,0.09542033,0.030395744,0.0055279746,0.02130937,0.00038384338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015976052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030343002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030604895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005473715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002190609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16185611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391313134","doi":"10.3758/s13423-024-02461-z","title":"The effects of strength and activation level of belief on belief-biased reasoning","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Confirmation bias; Context (archaeology); Cognition; Cognitive bias; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Response bias; Attentional bias; Communication","score_opus":0.12368005995967443,"score_gpt":0.40447067623327015,"score_spread":0.2807906162735957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391313134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64908487,0.33751112,0.001780904,0.0032204704,0.0005343043,0.000069104855,0.00041877956,0.0000243531,0.0073560756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83637625,0.15909858,0.0014142257,0.0008922552,0.0007827843,0.000047890542,0.00028835086,0.000024538927,0.0010750989],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948055,0.00019970487,0.00004146499,0.00011383051,0.000116306095,0.000048162292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98655045,0.011574171,0.00087362883,0.00032272798,0.00042342916,0.00025572188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021189323,0.00035157384,0.0007562581,0.0002771206,0.0001512274,0.0007728516,0.00043305423,0.00057941786,0.0029620274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012542641,0.00033505773,0.00080937525,0.00036637645,0.0008790156,0.00051417894,0.00029325928,0.001424437,0.00028566713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04270735,0.0019632194,0.099223964,0.014762434,0.010373626,0.00027354396,0.00078697415,0.0018224954,0.021511283,0.0043298863,0.00431934,0.79792595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002131208,0.005451389,0.94104207,0.0014388332,0.015121265,0.00057646545,0.0002961525,0.001596171,0.0072299656,0.012775641,0.01222167,0.000119148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023825602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021735572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029620274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046401483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048944686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01120609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391597751","doi":"10.3390/jrfm17020065","title":"Illusion of Control: Psychological Characteristics as Moderators in Financial Decision Making","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Illusion of control; Illusion; Lottery; Control (management); Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Event (particle physics); Psychology; Decision-making; Process (computing); Cognitive psychology; Marketing; Computer science; Economics; Business; Management; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.033270325806179155,"score_gpt":0.3640292075294598,"score_spread":0.3307588817232806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391597751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981766,0.00010075933,0.00040528327,0.00012319275,0.0000085015645,0.000020505748,0.000031605763,0.0000045876936,0.0011289917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99929714,0.000032023934,0.0003465076,0.000035981655,0.0000068519107,0.000014811297,0.000024809387,0.0000042019324,0.0002376434],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977773,0.0012140236,0.00013908203,0.00031826235,0.00035760918,0.00019375293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9573255,0.03189676,0.0053639053,0.002383035,0.0006401785,0.0023906445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003548489,0.0003630157,0.00042552868,0.0006769923,0.00068156427,0.0016645518,0.00037703267,0.00081653846,0.005932245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021863736,0.00024353917,0.00040149444,0.000506402,0.0015020602,0.0011230963,0.0011840758,0.0013775949,0.0002024865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032268271,0.0023204167,0.95431334,0.0001261386,0.0003254417,0.00019017138,0.0065348293,0.00037221555,0.00784352,0.0019936452,0.00022002823,0.022533512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035021392,0.00052834605,0.9940171,0.000023385366,0.0001045421,0.000097776465,0.0013670282,0.0011430574,0.0008855264,0.0014138524,0.00036033386,0.000023975783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082710595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091675605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005932245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035504968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041306103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019845307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391610744","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2024.2313566","title":"Reasoning strategy moderates the transition between slow and fast reasoning","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Counterexample; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Constraint (computer-aided design); Cognitive psychology; Logical reasoning; Limit (mathematics); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.13382975763191107,"score_gpt":0.45783166339474024,"score_spread":0.32400190576282917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391610744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99871004,0.00004226973,0.00015725687,0.000040842868,0.000004355256,0.000009586722,0.00001974273,0.00000827956,0.0010075177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984855,0.00004283527,0.0005455219,0.000053958793,0.0000043807504,0.00001573596,0.00008058643,0.000021028864,0.0007505184],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887365,0.00033049972,0.00010841345,0.00032373995,0.00020395973,0.00015974027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790381,0.011989957,0.005177592,0.0014480355,0.00050792954,0.0018383441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020136072,0.00024634274,0.00034142003,0.0005777304,0.00025605722,0.0024395927,0.0002958953,0.00090969884,0.005758133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01960566,0.00052007986,0.00025056727,0.0002676734,0.0007672946,0.0010325516,0.0009866769,0.001424458,0.00048705447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0091166925,0.0052511995,0.78404933,0.00028491687,0.00049759384,0.0006257251,0.010573012,0.00151062,0.1408837,0.0042868364,0.0011542017,0.041766196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019332029,0.00080684404,0.9872838,0.000030411618,0.000103520724,0.00029832553,0.0009827765,0.002537562,0.0039044323,0.0029098673,0.0009071751,0.00004191504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009123924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015665232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005758133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025842618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037601992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01926291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391765618","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105742","title":"Distinguishing between intrinsic and instrumental sources of the value of choice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Royal Society; UK Research and Innovation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Psychology; Preference; Operationalization; Value (mathematics); Freedom of choice; Contingency; Intrinsic value (animal ethics); Social psychology; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Statistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10496555205710945,"score_gpt":0.3802426852229569,"score_spread":0.27527713316584745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391765618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9157608,0.00052120606,0.055133164,0.0010265672,0.000028924056,0.000038401773,0.00009278419,0.000041108662,0.02735709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959448,0.0000894291,0.003645478,0.000060681585,0.000011606481,0.00001714424,0.000030201314,0.000007900506,0.00019280743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99466765,0.0027886096,0.00031017992,0.00056198577,0.0013717015,0.00029991675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96269494,0.027047306,0.003892097,0.004171276,0.0011759495,0.0010184129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009127789,0.0003377264,0.00064014556,0.0009903437,0.00041169263,0.0029559205,0.00061439286,0.0008314438,0.0032341322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041205935,0.00031322532,0.00052842294,0.000602382,0.004253785,0.0034944457,0.0024106002,0.0018716851,0.00017290955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039053564,0.000638334,0.1906196,0.0014691649,0.0014769413,0.0006386659,0.010267899,0.009481865,0.063870184,0.54203063,0.0010286414,0.17457281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026275998,0.0007571388,0.20733063,0.00030872502,0.00041946996,0.00067881204,0.0035333515,0.030415837,0.017458681,0.73305565,0.0055226125,0.00025629732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020412644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040893233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009127789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061624433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043071635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048272967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391824529","doi":"10.48152/ssrp-37z6-xr67","title":"Reproduction of 'The impact of past behaviour normality on regret: replication and extension of three experiments of the exceptionality effect'","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Normality; Reproduction; Replication (statistics); Extension (predicate logic); Statistics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.24066814752282337,"score_gpt":0.48425241449171635,"score_spread":0.243584266968893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391824529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869487,0.00010130993,0.0074038794,0.00038791684,0.00016501284,0.00022087326,0.0005198919,0.0001514936,0.0041008834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922651,0.000035174064,0.004663697,0.00026638163,0.000032704327,0.00038779317,0.00025532086,0.00009982121,0.0019940666],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99602866,0.002156087,0.00030359588,0.0007408465,0.00059564266,0.00017511312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84785545,0.0955803,0.0065664807,0.04610699,0.002406751,0.0014840761],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007637535,0.00048172203,0.0009474633,0.00031782076,0.00045808335,0.000938525,0.002023947,0.001346572,0.0066121975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054081816,0.00044663754,0.00088377437,0.00024466374,0.001812236,0.0010770336,0.0013353417,0.0022123663,0.0006060714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08691662,0.040994976,0.069440454,0.0018656023,0.0026643742,0.0017560964,0.010777672,0.025936944,0.4689078,0.0292204,0.011988532,0.24953051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01564811,0.0677833,0.4720042,0.0003601982,0.002341932,0.0030855197,0.002211239,0.1034365,0.25713226,0.05772385,0.017099692,0.0011732696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045438893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021477328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99236244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073315593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011280403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040391624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392050192","doi":"10.3390/jintelligence12030025","title":"Are There Two Kinds of Reasoners?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligence","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Probabilistic logic; Variety (cybernetics); Construct (python library); Cognition; Psychology; Inference; Proposition; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Contingency; Statistical model; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.22002803998214437,"score_gpt":0.47149300993891524,"score_spread":0.25146496995677087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392050192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35523176,0.047164533,0.2185403,0.22620015,0.0037221608,0.00049463,0.0012013139,0.001719706,0.14572544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8740327,0.007318177,0.06767264,0.037532244,0.0012717742,0.000630393,0.0008710432,0.00026684682,0.010404253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851221,0.003972865,0.00096159015,0.0047968174,0.0030505972,0.00209602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9674414,0.013702712,0.0043708663,0.0075493646,0.0033258966,0.0036097101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0192097,0.00069342897,0.0016165406,0.0039566476,0.0016159589,0.008829239,0.0031951517,0.007065852,0.009184481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045120765,0.0011762432,0.0018275585,0.0018079954,0.019860793,0.023279767,0.0051040347,0.005601069,0.0030681912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094069936,0.00050900644,0.086725436,0.0011867101,0.00048105913,0.00075521314,0.014444871,0.00043207078,0.0026303579,0.6088096,0.018224841,0.26486027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021481211,0.00016103942,0.028986495,0.00062902697,0.00014590396,0.002755483,0.008242431,0.0018681657,0.0013370673,0.89311296,0.06237243,0.00017412828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009589695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006602291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0192097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015932377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017086831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101591825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392082513","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-50947-6_1","title":"Consumer Decision-Making Strategies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.1257670528963534,"score_gpt":0.4126132145957136,"score_spread":0.28684616169936017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392082513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006792988,0.0018210959,0.032282714,0.0015487177,0.00011325879,0.00006539369,0.00013186855,0.00007201008,0.9571719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23950757,0.006505662,0.033672508,0.0007937254,0.00014460293,0.00022006252,0.00045812814,0.00013140833,0.71856636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997397,0.00007633928,0.0000059919926,0.000032142227,0.00011959166,0.000026316113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978596,0.000117478645,0.000008058016,0.000028951743,0.00004422751,0.000015314441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043364556,0.0007697858,0.00022545095,0.00055625057,0.00039264883,0.0026061435,0.0005333705,0.000897147,0.026655996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011784413,0.00022254002,0.00025683324,0.0009207061,0.00074407965,0.0016779709,0.0005185419,0.00087257003,0.0062922183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001545162,0.000039136154,0.00016678413,0.000056518707,0.000008721554,0.000044734636,0.00036013452,0.0013099829,0.0006586584,0.88679826,0.02477477,0.0857668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010427804,0.00002696134,0.0006148604,0.0001238867,0.000014174052,0.00015439902,0.0004546131,0.008830357,0.0015254377,0.67984223,0.30838603,0.000016650272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016699703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020441767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026655996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014554495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072076416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0891732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392562007","doi":"10.1037/cbs0000410","title":"Delay discounting in individuals with anxiety and related disorders compared to healthy controls.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse","keywords":"Psychology; Anxiety; Delay discounting; Clinical psychology; Discounting; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry; Impulsivity","score_opus":0.10574717252733956,"score_gpt":0.3289289665401412,"score_spread":0.22318179401280164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392562007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99947864,0.00012106914,0.000014803324,0.000022560493,0.000008421032,0.0000021931153,0.00006866819,0.0000014995693,0.0002820846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996594,0.00005721092,0.000020297593,0.000011516013,0.0000046715904,0.0000012024726,0.00006529942,6.557432e-7,0.00017977759],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991536,0.0000146686525,0.0000083421155,0.000025363197,0.000016334285,0.000019974514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941695,0.0001212292,0.00021103967,0.00003543826,0.000036022913,0.00017946919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002131085,0.0002958155,0.00028545997,0.00058454764,0.0002144943,0.00051329285,0.00018675336,0.00033738257,0.0018309506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015089097,0.00013865661,0.00022427818,0.0003171524,0.00020338275,0.00020866553,0.00023607007,0.00044641425,0.00017211489],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004900531,0.0007682406,0.97509557,0.000055650366,0.00026649045,0.0010597866,0.0006633457,0.000120801924,0.0048572593,0.00021118579,0.00032032697,0.011680731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032166357,0.0003391863,0.9985304,0.000004057576,0.000054268072,0.00047763856,0.00016945734,0.00011399103,0.00006580912,0.00011070127,0.00009685777,0.0000053891094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077369185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004044503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077369185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021237686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010682531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01538378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392730158","doi":"10.48152/ssrp-1yg9-0z41","title":"Reproduction of 'Agency Beliefs Over Time and Across Cultures: Free Will Beliefs Predict Higher Job Satisfaction'","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Job satisfaction; Reproduction; Social psychology; Psychology; Job attitude; Demographic economics; Job performance; Economics; Sociology; Biology; Ecology; Social science","score_opus":0.08711710148123276,"score_gpt":0.41717115684411543,"score_spread":0.3300540553628827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392730158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983852,0.000027832872,0.00008743869,0.00012935793,0.000010903148,0.000004361577,0.00019860237,0.000001500199,0.0011547825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987607,0.000014394712,0.00006994022,0.000031224215,0.0000055185915,0.0000072898088,0.00021576807,0.0000029093583,0.0008921918],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992066,0.00037749164,0.000043820393,0.00011882131,0.00010851766,0.00014470906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827266,0.008007928,0.0033536626,0.0021636153,0.0014054604,0.002342786],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023065084,0.00024841097,0.0002714767,0.00048189223,0.0007579961,0.0019097588,0.00050093647,0.0007256945,0.007015794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013087601,0.00032741693,0.0006120122,0.0006523066,0.0005107521,0.00078399706,0.0009512283,0.0016271601,0.00086794834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021087646,0.0002521467,0.9918813,0.000006083969,0.000103920494,0.000057614747,0.001521678,0.00012733029,0.0004578216,0.00018984666,0.00040020546,0.0047912463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007242776,0.00006493042,0.9977581,0.0000045450784,0.00003425308,0.0000366859,0.0013028117,0.00030020776,0.00019204996,0.00015016965,0.00014296829,0.0000060071357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027288126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02491775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033976012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072639686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054258585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392863756","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2377","title":"Attention! Do We Really Need Attention Checks?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.1264952074393649,"score_gpt":0.4466319224044139,"score_spread":0.32013671496504903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392863756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96682054,0.0022107481,0.018132126,0.0032974547,0.0005940401,0.00021917716,0.00029628663,0.00042184902,0.008007742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869284,0.00042782314,0.00948588,0.0015528604,0.000249612,0.00021774453,0.00013066322,0.000051286486,0.00095565594],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927193,0.0046762615,0.00040116842,0.0006940548,0.001209181,0.00029997024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81926817,0.14266546,0.015340027,0.013204347,0.006125393,0.0033965213],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017085927,0.0005394215,0.0010525129,0.0006419754,0.00043564616,0.001630014,0.0013041316,0.0012762278,0.0061888597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12392766,0.00027235318,0.00040598403,0.00044567764,0.0015407461,0.0030526852,0.0009269035,0.0013344155,0.0010568242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015531944,0.006643622,0.23927537,0.0031886743,0.00092338596,0.00034875763,0.0034268876,0.0013895403,0.04164179,0.0063813296,0.012123514,0.6691252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013436158,0.020582303,0.8219915,0.001679523,0.0008376047,0.0010804218,0.0030542053,0.010412357,0.066924065,0.039973237,0.031660374,0.00046079778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005954275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061563205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9829141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039942743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059075124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090360105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392905657","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4731568","title":"Veblen Goods and Neighborhoods: Endogenizing Consumption Reference Groups","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Veblen good; Consumption (sociology); Luxury goods; Economics; Conspicuous consumption; Neoclassical economics; Sociology; Business; Advertising; Institutional economics; Social science","score_opus":0.12246217836395266,"score_gpt":0.38670562112736373,"score_spread":0.26424344276341105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392905657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9361617,0.0005091567,0.044065107,0.0010374353,0.000031060034,0.000076291,0.00048252582,0.00003439147,0.017602386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878292,0.00019394279,0.008114837,0.000052986285,0.000011907467,0.000051769865,0.00021634356,0.000011444595,0.0035175434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875474,0.0007107804,0.000035744662,0.00028296627,0.00011205208,0.000103784536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912649,0.004763844,0.0013782516,0.0017296233,0.0005291983,0.00033425892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024631957,0.0002726304,0.0006216523,0.0014950288,0.0008713632,0.0028107238,0.0009164456,0.0011020971,0.008174151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018990278,0.00025197258,0.00044780414,0.0020535686,0.0017303342,0.0027944937,0.0018786767,0.0008377307,0.00037942993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009806978,0.00042205382,0.19706868,0.00016957587,0.00027401338,0.00024091997,0.007518863,0.017095355,0.000975118,0.69772977,0.0022455333,0.07527946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017083698,0.00042158988,0.15533435,0.00023428831,0.00027164572,0.00017652538,0.009487188,0.07240665,0.0012721518,0.74773943,0.012402667,0.00008272569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012167225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016428856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012167225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00156795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047292837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02734524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392916327","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/qjcwn","title":"Goal-directed behaviour is associated with decreased temporal discounting","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Baycrest Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Psychology; Delay discounting; Temporal discounting; Economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.09562391032963335,"score_gpt":0.3848496818078755,"score_spread":0.28922577147824213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392916327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978763,0.00015682454,0.0007567786,0.00010897969,0.0000113212445,0.0000057334546,0.00013704071,0.00003104926,0.0009159638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859387,0.000104669685,0.0005898278,0.000033231787,0.000009181783,0.0000069237844,0.00013589437,0.000014528364,0.00051191665],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996345,0.00009472962,0.000038910784,0.00013080057,0.00006731239,0.00003367197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920597,0.0021015194,0.0037244994,0.0010816808,0.00024481505,0.00078785483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007935631,0.00035150713,0.00032361047,0.00061005517,0.00017592649,0.0007357698,0.0003057107,0.00050551776,0.0039697085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006263319,0.00026354595,0.0003136984,0.00038758825,0.00048490686,0.00028308012,0.00040820733,0.0011945218,0.00023013602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0072488044,0.0020897242,0.81026065,0.00043568626,0.00088797224,0.0023227294,0.0016158568,0.0012313292,0.13502268,0.0017884778,0.0011832699,0.035912868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048436756,0.00035282763,0.9923833,0.000015045961,0.00009301174,0.0016014104,0.000107193984,0.00091081264,0.0022426448,0.0017599673,0.00046513393,0.000020207068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001041834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007287203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039697085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001986299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013511808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013279974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392919485","doi":"10.1177/15501906241232454","title":"The Problem of Compromise in Conservation and Exhibit Decision Making","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Collections A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage; Canadian Museum of Nature; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Mindset; Heuristics; Perspective (graphical); Management science; Risk analysis (engineering); Constructive; Computer science; Instinct; Teamwork; Operations research; Business; Political science; Process (computing); Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.07858467272393613,"score_gpt":0.42753863199592407,"score_spread":0.3489539592719879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392919485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1583653,0.010907208,0.2820269,0.09553489,0.0016270679,0.0005058974,0.00016759319,0.0001381013,0.450727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93282306,0.0031982644,0.052330133,0.0018627604,0.00027924715,0.00028370038,0.000046158268,0.000064004635,0.009112723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95496833,0.034164615,0.001294864,0.0026375274,0.004224987,0.0027097508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9561917,0.036115367,0.0025910966,0.0016226765,0.0018185327,0.0016605299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037760843,0.0008188526,0.0013305602,0.002232746,0.007874635,0.020073391,0.0023940974,0.0066504595,0.009066927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054849226,0.00077765645,0.0015185283,0.0027120705,0.025456639,0.011512836,0.008832828,0.0061302865,0.0007630206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103955776,0.00006868934,0.0019404916,0.00028523966,0.00012087613,0.00040449164,0.009748119,0.013049949,0.0003112554,0.93877375,0.0034957144,0.03169751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021881426,0.000065869885,0.00086030475,0.0002638177,0.000028263818,0.00017439364,0.009890887,0.0077187195,0.00020692425,0.958235,0.022481307,0.000052517353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030779936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044367425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037760843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007988297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006547579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19970077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393259529","doi":"10.1037/mac0000172","title":"Younger and older women, but not men, are implicitly biased to associate honesty with children.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Honesty; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.13997066518018156,"score_gpt":0.42389111911387456,"score_spread":0.28392045393369303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393259529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958203,0.00033350565,0.00019895795,0.00023996209,0.000037472073,0.0000060761754,0.000079377496,0.0000037701718,0.0032804417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997872,0.00028454958,0.00018061405,0.0002370523,0.000037479767,0.0000063156454,0.0000805118,0.0000052112455,0.0012962986],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944025,0.00019023716,0.00004015231,0.00009925498,0.00015942336,0.00007067504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98855525,0.00451981,0.0049861236,0.0007380431,0.00046469312,0.00073607115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001745409,0.00019831632,0.00030160043,0.00039506698,0.00034102736,0.0010479086,0.0001904391,0.0005582452,0.006630979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019267244,0.00024595574,0.00020476388,0.00025283,0.0005154914,0.0005727682,0.00036785426,0.00052020006,0.0008872608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016810911,0.0002800045,0.9410031,0.00008527309,0.00021669388,0.00038508314,0.0046366397,0.000104508275,0.012716673,0.0006156238,0.0016372761,0.03663794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000370105,0.0001895056,0.9936466,0.000045912828,0.00007689076,0.0006096536,0.0015075693,0.00025390595,0.0010874092,0.001180174,0.0013432341,0.000022153918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030798407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049076756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006630979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013900266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021936129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022182882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393319687","doi":"10.1177/01461672261439247","title":"Everyone I Don’t Like Is Biased: Affective Evaluations and the Bias Blind Spot","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Blind spot; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.2869992681249452,"score_gpt":0.4845625428265228,"score_spread":0.19756327470157758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393319687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96756995,0.0007112778,0.0061326153,0.0015516264,0.00009811323,0.000039355124,0.000049874667,0.000028180611,0.023819018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982664,0.00010128877,0.00081808853,0.00035023346,0.000021291236,0.000012567882,0.00001127001,0.000010012481,0.00040889523],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967547,0.0021276693,0.000089542635,0.00026694688,0.00061009487,0.00015097135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983922,0.009114219,0.0035607468,0.0015739161,0.0011478242,0.0006812165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004796259,0.00023859653,0.00030590605,0.0005551494,0.0009223559,0.0018574727,0.00020096106,0.00063711806,0.0024854275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027528657,0.00022007799,0.00021696028,0.0003710052,0.0022540917,0.0014312111,0.0012051964,0.0009855678,0.00021562414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046016215,0.00091385236,0.5009722,0.00083939254,0.00061146915,0.0012655329,0.07528816,0.0015627933,0.072289914,0.07542508,0.009183776,0.25704622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023949493,0.00085397606,0.832692,0.00037994125,0.00031975214,0.0016870488,0.026200354,0.005815303,0.012943511,0.10384737,0.014765258,0.00025595303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010903364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010616538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004796259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050649035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029454852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025365293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393858146","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105774","title":"Emotions before actions: When children see costs as causal","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.1232972240289099,"score_gpt":0.41432051707761963,"score_spread":0.2910232930487097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393858146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95821613,0.0007330216,0.011081561,0.0015125435,0.00003207721,0.000021488353,0.00016758936,0.000061774976,0.028173862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959044,0.00020399228,0.003059791,0.00015761738,0.0000068305367,0.000013352272,0.00006687638,0.000018588034,0.0005685213],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987727,0.00032722577,0.00008009871,0.00030306526,0.00033828567,0.00017857779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99241567,0.003369299,0.0026026838,0.00070666015,0.00051925634,0.00038643702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017443126,0.00034399782,0.00024263503,0.0004651769,0.00038005007,0.0027395007,0.0002978735,0.0009144124,0.003302708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012888142,0.0005632304,0.00032492896,0.00029721964,0.0022445559,0.0042276434,0.0010201819,0.0013822312,0.00024420998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005005129,0.00018515182,0.74038106,0.00041715693,0.00014700703,0.0018610592,0.048887193,0.0024223116,0.024639437,0.09802904,0.0019496536,0.08058043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041735726,0.00022389444,0.8627326,0.00024109047,0.0001536465,0.0019090961,0.016243735,0.0055708727,0.009364649,0.08737391,0.016008938,0.00013576608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028682959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00492898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003302708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009894317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041177156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011048615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394617843","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2381","title":"Measuring Rational Thinking in Adolescents: The Assessment of Rational Thinking for Youth (ART‐Y)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Rationality; Numeracy; Cognition; Literacy; Developmental psychology; Mathematics education; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.21265458672150173,"score_gpt":0.4519607289546748,"score_spread":0.2393061422331731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394617843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99509287,0.00029162478,0.0017569422,0.000060504568,0.000019550522,0.00018229497,0.00067345885,0.00003928293,0.0018835322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98831683,0.00036520686,0.008438696,0.000046765515,0.000015042797,0.00056070066,0.0012199352,0.000012634319,0.001024205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988716,0.00034913034,0.00021947201,0.000121364734,0.00033049684,0.00010784545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920284,0.0017482957,0.0036114457,0.00036364153,0.0015631618,0.0006851114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026820186,0.00047022363,0.0004228927,0.0014225676,0.00032423425,0.0010247871,0.00035064746,0.0004376733,0.0015832644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00664087,0.00027092927,0.0008141277,0.000629072,0.00034135493,0.00060914294,0.001049789,0.0011651963,0.000361833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014059295,0.00037602635,0.95961064,0.00009366188,0.00007900634,0.000086173946,0.00059868454,0.0005242641,0.001045286,0.00045201115,0.0010173386,0.03597636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018899458,0.00048799088,0.99341834,0.000058605634,0.00004841062,0.00037430457,0.00028808572,0.0016216534,0.001476754,0.0006295225,0.0015567768,0.000020636355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015815768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003103256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026820186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031721892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008022736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014183998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394773979","doi":"10.1016/bs.adms.2024.03.002","title":"Boundary conditions of the rational model: Finding the limits of rationality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in motivation science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Rational planning model; Axiom; Mathematical proof; Mathematical economics; Management science; Irrational number; Computer science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.19618450666490836,"score_gpt":0.44265941162310973,"score_spread":0.24647490495820137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394773979","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07337494,0.010198058,0.49131632,0.019967608,0.0007894247,0.0001047186,0.0003619746,0.0002671111,0.40361983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.905643,0.004897117,0.06858513,0.0009919391,0.0009310602,0.00035098742,0.00024106752,0.000272664,0.018086914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978671,0.0010424885,0.00009158059,0.00028475968,0.00050675235,0.00020730025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99193406,0.0065127136,0.00033013607,0.00050224125,0.0004270003,0.00029379074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003279008,0.00079259987,0.0013097179,0.0010785023,0.0011473508,0.0053700763,0.0018088657,0.003076421,0.0074102846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01871974,0.00080236525,0.0010479934,0.0008954782,0.0067796623,0.009666089,0.0020886927,0.0065503176,0.0010781417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074968757,0.0000063942935,0.00003361456,0.0000143136685,0.0000030083504,0.000011596073,0.00008132037,0.0016632833,0.00009144316,0.9956962,0.0008364511,0.0015548591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002372725,0.0000014324402,0.000014159092,0.0000086269965,0.0000011304398,0.0000032668186,0.0000149018915,0.0033552179,0.00002716349,0.995993,0.00057632703,0.0000022923537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001452362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057632796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074102846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019636399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017576647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02478987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394841178","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0299511","title":"Gamification and motivation: Impact on delay discounting performance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Reed College","keywords":"Discounting; Delay discounting; Impulsivity; Task (project management); Psychology; Temporal discounting; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Cognitive psychology; Function (biology); Developmental psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.24949325862279703,"score_gpt":0.38132069503653576,"score_spread":0.13182743641373873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394841178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990909,0.00006537616,0.0004036037,0.000017441416,0.0000045888096,0.000008457396,0.000037443293,0.0000119888655,0.00036020557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854326,0.000044953424,0.00087538606,0.00000842403,0.0000033557662,0.000027041042,0.000059715414,0.0000112467515,0.00042667383],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905723,0.000367909,0.00007555445,0.00021054225,0.00018128807,0.0001075803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925035,0.0040694633,0.0014039059,0.00050336565,0.00021251025,0.0013071641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016103896,0.00058108004,0.0004496042,0.00039969216,0.00013802685,0.0013436248,0.00029142867,0.00047350867,0.0025121768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009834428,0.00022535167,0.00035451105,0.00032795334,0.00045170746,0.0004928119,0.00093411404,0.00087008177,0.00019954714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.048088208,0.015990471,0.4504324,0.00091572414,0.0011783479,0.0007072721,0.0045680315,0.005822049,0.3536488,0.0028015575,0.00061995996,0.1152271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002791019,0.011266741,0.9410367,0.000055132816,0.00036773775,0.00029706646,0.00039333297,0.010289323,0.03236733,0.002503043,0.0010311528,0.000113331764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056945445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004236963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025121768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017595466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019870263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00851661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396899401","doi":"10.1007/s10683-024-09824-2","title":"Task completion without commitment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Task (project management); Organizational commitment; Psychology; Completion (oil and gas wells); Social psychology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.15626036128212378,"score_gpt":0.4305159007337755,"score_spread":0.2742555394516517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396899401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96554416,0.00024913784,0.013671132,0.000451846,0.0001680164,0.0006227238,0.00081578287,0.00022267262,0.018254453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772182,0.00014849781,0.011637584,0.00031149533,0.000055832756,0.0015984627,0.0010261806,0.00011386852,0.007889865],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.997148,0.0008257919,0.00031402768,0.0008323921,0.0005110998,0.00036863962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97305095,0.013012919,0.0026642124,0.00859455,0.00079380535,0.001883547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004420984,0.00079309626,0.0010243601,0.00027299975,0.0006508761,0.0015272603,0.0014105969,0.0014873467,0.02222651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040173475,0.00055786833,0.0006441235,0.00038409757,0.0006458594,0.0023381994,0.001702148,0.0022698045,0.003301354],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.11332094,0.026801717,0.07169261,0.0043096533,0.001082147,0.0009459936,0.007559215,0.03760254,0.2148904,0.10070567,0.018933887,0.40215525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024604801,0.07680363,0.23824869,0.001035384,0.0015658437,0.0015165927,0.0032073061,0.12584801,0.07493822,0.34227833,0.10873627,0.0012168918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071851304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005911387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02222651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051816145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010130164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074355066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398332890","doi":"10.1080/00131857.2024.2354459","title":"Behavioral insights: The problem of control in education governance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Philosophy and Theory","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Sociology; Control (management); Philosophy of education; Public administration; Higher education; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Political science; Management; Economics; Law; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.05102831256646106,"score_gpt":0.37540851913693973,"score_spread":0.32438020657047867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398332890","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09767258,0.0036516064,0.40570334,0.17538373,0.0005307245,0.0001016733,0.00020141549,0.00014262393,0.31661227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863217,0.00062251766,0.0070120827,0.00220984,0.00021053366,0.000071858936,0.000023984097,0.000020699516,0.0035067603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99016726,0.0061327564,0.00027883236,0.0011474196,0.0017219394,0.00055186625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887782,0.007223679,0.0011903776,0.0015011389,0.00089760753,0.00040908752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011349414,0.00046043823,0.0005325538,0.0013595324,0.0021309452,0.005027505,0.0014176948,0.0028798142,0.003229562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01532742,0.00024489037,0.00054446206,0.0010016613,0.023067549,0.0064301314,0.0027070066,0.003940021,0.00021529607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035590942,0.000007350825,0.00026210127,0.0000092167475,0.000004570983,0.00001184269,0.00037750177,0.00062796834,0.000022850754,0.9963521,0.00024130498,0.00207971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061068645,0.000008208246,0.00031199647,0.00002237092,0.0000032593155,0.00001499265,0.00028268396,0.0020619633,0.00006266718,0.9919585,0.0052613625,0.000005985378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042364504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022137929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011349414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003815904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025048398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060022116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399215419","doi":"10.1177/0272989x241256121","title":"Thinking Fast, Slow, and Forever: Daniel Kahneman Obituary","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Medical Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Obituary; Prospect theory; Psychology; Economics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Microeconomics; Theology","score_opus":0.0449707019638836,"score_gpt":0.40334184378099586,"score_spread":0.35837114181711227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399215419","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014491674,0.0043525347,0.00018614397,0.07394601,0.9206821,0.000010452804,0.000036084413,0.000026370482,0.00074572314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00039015696,0.0031664018,0.000117144475,0.027504819,0.96340495,0.000027606326,0.000013948879,0.00003397288,0.005341034],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99063194,0.0027679626,0.0011525118,0.0009567014,0.0040886737,0.00040216662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9281521,0.038213853,0.0031529968,0.0014723422,0.024666237,0.0043423804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0135935135,0.0042430013,0.0054342244,0.005054339,0.004795274,0.010532524,0.0046452577,0.017273225,0.013157294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084249966,0.001391778,0.0024512308,0.002121625,0.0043426026,0.005364365,0.002003096,0.028245183,0.010059161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017016793,0.000006144447,0.000016862934,0.00008302991,0.00001176557,0.000042985845,0.0000100590105,0.000017207976,0.000008639842,0.00034320756,0.99754274,0.0019002373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011291446,0.000020541847,0.00027341425,0.001014958,0.000095000665,0.00025726663,0.000080802674,0.00038586097,0.00010440242,0.0052045006,0.9923955,0.000054823468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004457444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010766351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017273225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050218552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005287016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071890235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399217197","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2023.00522","title":"Forgetful Consumers and Consumption Tracking","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Tracking (education); Computer science; Economics; Business; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.18233446637327122,"score_gpt":0.444194229170756,"score_spread":0.2618597627974848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399217197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74403185,0.0027508233,0.119560555,0.016243476,0.00031440833,0.0003910232,0.0017409106,0.00047096037,0.114496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808686,0.00069087616,0.002626867,0.00038305073,0.00008525557,0.0000874801,0.0001441166,0.00002367042,0.01509013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945277,0.00015566783,0.000016863285,0.000101365345,0.00006320395,0.0002101072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942642,0.0031743224,0.0015157282,0.000255414,0.00035087843,0.00043949464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013032499,0.0007624152,0.0010009854,0.0009442933,0.0009133875,0.0025598686,0.0015624528,0.003730028,0.026684118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065533253,0.00046679488,0.0012860885,0.0008020137,0.0015789677,0.0035581226,0.0014698411,0.0027598985,0.000859921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006437962,0.0009406333,0.030737735,0.00040337595,0.00016458961,0.0024628865,0.0013290674,0.14266449,0.0032505903,0.76274455,0.016734257,0.037924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003005446,0.0005277067,0.017145138,0.00015723649,0.00023062681,0.00076644507,0.0014569331,0.6380958,0.0010803423,0.3266496,0.01341177,0.00017788331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010497261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006784982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026684118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025411677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013606773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089267254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399466491","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.05.597571","title":"SK609, a novel dopamine D3 receptor agonist and norepinephrine transporter blocker with pro-cognitive actions, does not induce psychostimulant-like increases in risky choice during probabilistic discounting","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dopamine receptor D3; Agonist; Dopamine; Discounting; Dopamine transporter; Norepinephrine transporter; Dopamine receptor D2; Norepinephrine; Probabilistic logic; Neuroscience; Pharmacology; Receptor; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Internal medicine; Business; Dopaminergic; Finance; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04670085633784389,"score_gpt":0.30959718391925434,"score_spread":0.26289632758141046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399466491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997494,0.00023599791,0.00083715736,0.000061713574,0.000031530642,0.000037872873,0.00049216265,0.00006546717,0.0007441374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99505013,0.00046171938,0.0017446666,0.000076100776,0.000018128325,0.00012233581,0.00060237857,0.000025290965,0.0018991794],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997553,0.000023920737,0.000035208246,0.000049056333,0.000068731104,0.00006776718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959975,0.000048180307,0.0001318996,0.00004314059,0.00003802347,0.00013907731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013560223,0.00055380515,0.0005908599,0.00028023022,0.00014582474,0.00031143276,0.00038605605,0.00046174298,0.0026449515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022687177,0.0002464339,0.0004676259,0.00015836114,0.00044683475,0.0004638811,0.00023095506,0.0015133331,0.00041945153],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057603726,0.0012385212,0.0005654015,0.00011369624,0.000037635873,0.00005483821,0.000028201652,0.0001653698,0.9871755,0.000119453456,0.00011105844,0.0046298923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043422746,0.010982666,0.006645758,0.000016259655,0.000059291066,0.00014840609,0.000041067487,0.0013119457,0.97943145,0.0001084237,0.0008016097,0.000018846604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010292056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021194455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026449515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032728273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041643038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00884825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399523074","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1390741","title":"Time pressure increases children’s aversion to advantageous inequity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Inequity aversion; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Inequality","score_opus":0.037840186047903124,"score_gpt":0.39858756805411316,"score_spread":0.36074738200621004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399523074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99960107,0.000058265567,0.000028711951,0.00001616135,0.0000019546817,0.0000017033241,0.000015951404,0.0000023668144,0.00027386413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992169,0.00016098488,0.00023194496,0.000020507825,0.000002194501,0.000009965706,0.00004534236,0.0000039808024,0.00030815753],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942076,0.00011062809,0.000032137737,0.00011957346,0.00017892917,0.00013792227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957694,0.0014295076,0.0020075985,0.00019900964,0.00017250366,0.0004220027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072295836,0.00028022914,0.00031931864,0.00032784176,0.0003259634,0.0009547631,0.00017976077,0.00039884984,0.002704755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042672334,0.00025026023,0.0003468349,0.0002533761,0.0006873603,0.00028248725,0.00056434947,0.00069343264,0.00016269296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017981313,0.0010343189,0.91458845,0.0001583773,0.000087119195,0.0008326424,0.005868924,0.00023799295,0.060153205,0.0005643362,0.00041349028,0.014262947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017802173,0.00065005926,0.99282724,0.000019502233,0.00003258832,0.00027773684,0.0010106107,0.0001363715,0.0042477082,0.0001716438,0.000595379,0.000013287084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011691164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01740268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011691164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000755905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076348725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023246229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399848062","doi":"10.1177/09567976241256961","title":"Sensitivity to the Instrumental Value of Choice Increases Across Development","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Templeton World Charity Foundation; Jacobs Foundation; National Institute of Mental Health; York University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Preference; Value (mathematics); Agency (philosophy); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Replication (statistics); Statistics","score_opus":0.17906294243747187,"score_gpt":0.5050483237752172,"score_spread":0.32598538133774535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399848062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99305624,0.00012245824,0.0039692535,0.000077874975,0.0000040477385,0.000007920093,0.000060278147,0.000022957449,0.0026789359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980716,0.0000851342,0.0015305177,0.000029155348,0.0000020846653,0.000009116201,0.000041324492,0.000007771702,0.00022325644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853337,0.0004713043,0.00008414798,0.0004501132,0.00037991512,0.00008110225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98809,0.005675389,0.0035337913,0.0014728456,0.0006919289,0.0005361707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027980532,0.00022706501,0.00032257824,0.00053137064,0.00019676394,0.0012194419,0.00024787037,0.00039227167,0.0023782232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016400287,0.0003473132,0.0002660547,0.0002621126,0.0010514746,0.00064173253,0.0008547161,0.0009763918,0.00017841533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006893451,0.0003191857,0.8485777,0.00017153937,0.00032655027,0.0002941497,0.0035661636,0.0026219927,0.053814147,0.009674207,0.0003817443,0.07956325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018746674,0.00034028513,0.96953714,0.000042146647,0.00005575271,0.00055351586,0.0006969703,0.0027610043,0.01431104,0.009392066,0.0022367036,0.000054720098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010372882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011995621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027980532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003380692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024135633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0147976875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399856812","doi":"10.1037/emo0001347","title":"How bad becomes good: A neurocomputational model of affect-informed choice.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emotion","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institute of Mental Health; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.15814602079910306,"score_gpt":0.4089237130035878,"score_spread":0.25077769220448476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399856812","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27031225,0.0045293854,0.6152649,0.02496609,0.00026879786,0.00020730341,0.0011182333,0.00024110585,0.08309193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242974,0.0014225198,0.066859975,0.0008557014,0.00008504199,0.00022025316,0.0002576246,0.000035337158,0.0059661865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965835,0.00013688253,0.000016302545,0.00011589802,0.000046057106,0.000026532496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987531,0.0008083991,0.00019540147,0.000073185394,0.00006252868,0.00010742168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010272989,0.00036891867,0.00035515512,0.00055653957,0.00039860274,0.0025081579,0.000897743,0.0010036821,0.006050957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005999989,0.00028508407,0.0008064301,0.0007463461,0.0016754415,0.003598154,0.0007956435,0.0014063456,0.0007143956],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000181364,0.00015273152,0.020462876,0.00018627058,0.00022518504,0.0004234256,0.0016901961,0.094645806,0.0029872525,0.78483725,0.005084559,0.08912317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022511162,0.000044752014,0.009442197,0.000033941604,0.000041977368,0.00022054091,0.0002017675,0.1710085,0.00024885655,0.816415,0.0022968503,0.00002308721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002423104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022285467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006050957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001329862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006345021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020242453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399887836","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-59144-0_18","title":"Consumer Well-Being in Judgment and Decision-Making","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"International series on consumer science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.050484455948971635,"score_gpt":0.3679224903292694,"score_spread":0.3174380343802977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399887836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05213049,0.09517708,0.022546547,0.01812386,0.0016419503,0.00004927723,0.00018176631,0.00003657073,0.8101125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78693676,0.04472098,0.007500914,0.0016637767,0.0013563922,0.00007113476,0.00016377425,0.000046910965,0.15753935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998,0.00009209832,0.000006294168,0.000023825043,0.000060571565,0.000017159879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990088,0.00082112086,0.00002723475,0.000030495687,0.0000720424,0.000040218387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006373148,0.00035380083,0.00026782247,0.00047976596,0.00039331865,0.0020921025,0.00019082008,0.0007582735,0.0060331877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018849864,0.00013213795,0.00014278977,0.0009797614,0.0014333589,0.0017004586,0.0003677978,0.0011755874,0.00061658066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040356736,0.00010544981,0.0015732766,0.00015781505,0.000017549863,0.00012728218,0.0015556667,0.0011672932,0.0004587572,0.82053095,0.026052764,0.14821286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034225732,0.000027917516,0.0051188343,0.00016690427,0.000009895094,0.00013787243,0.0008420413,0.0019635705,0.00025767347,0.9282769,0.063181974,0.00001293949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014535687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019786148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060331877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082539517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004151062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020183027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400229466","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105995","title":"The impact of strategies on young children’s saving for the future","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Economic Development, Job Creation and Trade; Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science","keywords":"Psychology; Control (management); Tracking (education); Perspective (graphical); Developmental psychology; Early childhood; Early childhood education; Covariate; Economics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.07180166381770783,"score_gpt":0.4910968086294683,"score_spread":0.41929514481176045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400229466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988558,0.00018318562,0.000047562542,0.000017970086,0.0000013619562,0.0000070738975,0.000035825407,0.0000040951863,0.0008471517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973978,0.0005450412,0.0010749697,0.000017217604,0.0000013346336,0.00001732599,0.00014227234,0.0000032535763,0.0008007596],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994562,0.00009700437,0.000038852566,0.00006427405,0.00019581335,0.00014787127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825984,0.00057818077,0.0005172957,0.00010563561,0.00022141995,0.0003176171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008923511,0.00050081563,0.00019164827,0.00041075083,0.0003292161,0.0007954433,0.00035909232,0.00025986365,0.0012803167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037569338,0.00015349974,0.00035876723,0.00027552096,0.00039281935,0.0002965056,0.00032116484,0.00035527788,0.000107558495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076472055,0.0012058984,0.86112344,0.00038383828,0.00020511456,0.0007256757,0.011366014,0.0008946962,0.01685179,0.0011282329,0.00054544775,0.10480517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010407734,0.00029699717,0.99437416,0.000051539642,0.00009061065,0.000072443385,0.0018796667,0.00021695007,0.0018157731,0.00012998848,0.0010483385,0.00001308002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16349341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3437566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16349341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014967959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023243618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3250835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400313395","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4885567","title":"Information Combination and Preference Reversals: Eye-Tracking Data","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vanier College","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Eye tracking; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Optometry; Psychology; Economics; Medicine; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.16690602240847222,"score_gpt":0.4187591811976885,"score_spread":0.2518531587892163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400313395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885768,0.0004814835,0.0032322917,0.00006224703,0.000023379576,0.00006473569,0.0031888448,0.00006590279,0.004304353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927834,0.00025974,0.0028597394,0.000077261124,0.000013560002,0.000051085535,0.0022260025,0.00006558918,0.0016636142],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995542,0.00010035934,0.000044073102,0.00010919127,0.00014286565,0.000049263792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99343175,0.0036415474,0.001176968,0.0009897336,0.0005658457,0.00019426327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000941451,0.00025683155,0.0005330515,0.00071765255,0.00025200285,0.00095292914,0.0003459362,0.0006734081,0.005629974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0127171865,0.00028958629,0.00031895904,0.0012667611,0.0003002002,0.00070088106,0.0004388372,0.0010257375,0.0010219174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009477517,0.0012995991,0.35289985,0.0009992606,0.00071789976,0.00041415417,0.0012726316,0.007286702,0.44159725,0.0029777524,0.005844753,0.17521267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015072065,0.00061541924,0.94954777,0.000042634634,0.00014868638,0.0005901368,0.00012644843,0.017990306,0.026572626,0.0023821034,0.0017604912,0.000072684044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046950933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046587437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005629974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002766441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033694107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018834174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400341720","doi":"10.1080/00014788.2024.2364215","title":"Enhancing auditors’ professional skepticism through nudges: an eye-tracking experiment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting and Business Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"HEC Montréal; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Skepticism; Nudge theory; Audit; Eye tracking; Psychology; Tracking (education); Accounting; Business; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23787423315535733,"score_gpt":0.5344445220813828,"score_spread":0.2965702889260255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400341720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931593,0.00007973928,0.0030337977,0.00016799476,0.000051378487,0.00036117595,0.000087899105,0.000065203065,0.0029935187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98375386,0.00013826472,0.010922667,0.00033641982,0.000045064702,0.00087752286,0.00009092197,0.00003328026,0.0038021368],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969695,0.0011471267,0.0002771013,0.0005964101,0.00075169513,0.00025811815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96909845,0.021113254,0.003598898,0.003480562,0.0014525256,0.0012564101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046614264,0.00059814774,0.0005675001,0.00041154507,0.0007102766,0.0011940707,0.0008418486,0.0016045788,0.004682827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02177824,0.00041906023,0.00036762687,0.00026881427,0.00091389066,0.0010754521,0.00131024,0.0017575719,0.0005598662],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03493067,0.08029612,0.0408637,0.0013853617,0.00034217146,0.00069457997,0.022925172,0.0031519488,0.6265486,0.006189983,0.0032971536,0.17937453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014142325,0.21147795,0.37787673,0.0006858812,0.0011559327,0.0012399325,0.0074040843,0.04036517,0.29593107,0.019773588,0.02912569,0.0008215474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093608745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010608722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004682827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004887303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007432757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024652243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400442148","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2024.80bp","title":"When and Why Employees Can (Cannot) Learn from Their Errors: From a Cognitive Rumination Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research","funders":"","keywords":"Rumination; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08981426636891607,"score_gpt":0.36629618125678914,"score_spread":0.2764819148878731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400442148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96953493,0.001692893,0.018728951,0.002664271,0.000041039493,0.000034888508,0.00006462659,0.000028283901,0.00721003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980749,0.000351515,0.0012562955,0.00012440835,0.000014706447,0.000009209873,0.000016321768,0.0000023647337,0.0001502718],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978508,0.0011472076,0.00015850196,0.000267575,0.000301315,0.00027472695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97297794,0.01887249,0.0050675566,0.0011068566,0.0013513908,0.00062388595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041943737,0.00052797387,0.00032360395,0.0011954962,0.0007591365,0.0038740397,0.0007747211,0.0013233904,0.0008212086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026376143,0.00034407704,0.0005626764,0.00075317913,0.0024137155,0.004017856,0.0017388379,0.0013472737,0.00011802922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005520732,0.0006794668,0.72251254,0.0007424813,0.00041144397,0.0012260983,0.11152026,0.0060920203,0.0050119786,0.03171717,0.0010186343,0.118515894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006703616,0.00063265575,0.65077496,0.0009883149,0.0005681783,0.001372068,0.13630728,0.049252685,0.0051039485,0.14847717,0.006218834,0.0002368174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004144496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042172438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041943737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009440495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011799632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022182286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400855815","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105895","title":"Risky effort","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Psychology; Outcome (game theory); Bridge (graph theory); Risk-seeking; Social psychology; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.17018418784733802,"score_gpt":0.4379307702795981,"score_spread":0.26774658243226007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400855815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51712734,0.0049639745,0.08898272,0.0025253836,0.00038611033,0.00043356238,0.0022554814,0.00039441473,0.38293102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95719814,0.0017994104,0.011242225,0.00036025103,0.000091684946,0.00017867434,0.0006790658,0.000034171924,0.028416246],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999342,0.0002187792,0.000054369968,0.000113022536,0.00019255893,0.000079343576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830234,0.0005976877,0.00036437376,0.00025701057,0.00020614346,0.0002724225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011126534,0.00055706315,0.00033552363,0.0006411148,0.00031799258,0.0017647468,0.00037824071,0.0006454373,0.022226853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066256104,0.0001714471,0.00044149105,0.0004116416,0.00042646655,0.00084130175,0.0010018169,0.00057630544,0.0033788597],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066757435,0.0007864396,0.15653451,0.00078203215,0.000634498,0.0006172947,0.0020000767,0.0091784345,0.009509503,0.31047773,0.015611777,0.49320018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013657878,0.0016386086,0.39006728,0.00086119777,0.0004325236,0.0026138062,0.0016874117,0.016432626,0.005401005,0.42947012,0.15106304,0.00019580014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043085578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005308292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022226853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042919273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032804842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0743562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401031491","doi":"10.1177/10591478241265645","title":"Ups and Downs in Experience Design","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Production and Operations Management","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Event (particle physics); Computer science; A priori and a posteriori; Point (geometry); Target audience; Advertising; Psychology; Mathematics; Business; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1709372064768888,"score_gpt":0.41818925359745973,"score_spread":0.24725204712057094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401031491","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08222135,0.0009976317,0.8847118,0.0013058449,0.00008454627,0.00037877623,0.00004831905,0.000121189885,0.030130504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8034638,0.00044831555,0.19221053,0.00017918885,0.00005495169,0.0004246773,0.000030208032,0.00004598726,0.0031423622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875639,0.00889727,0.0004249604,0.0014353606,0.00095581537,0.0007226518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762088,0.01838568,0.001351478,0.0022079365,0.0007638018,0.0010824328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011136502,0.0012736754,0.00085526594,0.0010461764,0.0011750634,0.0044915923,0.0014329022,0.0021623857,0.008322104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02609208,0.0011180195,0.0014681205,0.0006121347,0.0053036627,0.0070211045,0.0038087454,0.0028306353,0.00046749046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006101804,0.00029650654,0.0035164626,0.0005268668,0.00012324989,0.00035526734,0.0031483783,0.11171369,0.0047709867,0.76285255,0.00072903495,0.11135691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019516393,0.0012713955,0.0015299154,0.00021791905,0.00011282292,0.00026347872,0.001112551,0.21235111,0.003255626,0.7702387,0.009364286,0.00008692675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007245474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000812679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011136502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002520875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017673024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058896184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401101277","doi":"10.3389/frym.2024.1212103","title":"How Do Simple Games Help us to Understand Decision-Making?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers for Young Minds","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Simple (philosophy); Decision fatigue; Order (exchange); Energy (signal processing); Psychology; Computer science; Business decision mapping; Decision engineering; Economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Decision support system; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05803270143153461,"score_gpt":0.36973157936087786,"score_spread":0.31169887792934325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401101277","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21189345,0.03635959,0.41661996,0.11484763,0.0028991431,0.00047522638,0.0009772494,0.00040266066,0.21552508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8813885,0.01586477,0.08794973,0.0057971487,0.0005314747,0.00024531203,0.00025803538,0.00015180201,0.007813235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798226,0.001212934,0.000088940724,0.00024196641,0.00028127976,0.00019259295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897681,0.007475629,0.0010087163,0.00040213182,0.0007602603,0.0005852245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035288066,0.0019640482,0.0010472159,0.0018264228,0.0009271509,0.005783818,0.0013700775,0.0019177994,0.0068861246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022047281,0.0006305565,0.0009962152,0.0010483424,0.00584501,0.015652912,0.001686668,0.0035420794,0.0012927091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013382922,0.0002429316,0.016101427,0.0011550568,0.00024747645,0.00029008492,0.0070027537,0.014319008,0.00093292847,0.8531981,0.014061859,0.09231464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025957439,0.0000620936,0.003605518,0.00034077256,0.000033664248,0.00012090058,0.0017965743,0.012880888,0.0002655465,0.96076673,0.020058205,0.000043095275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005730752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038685182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068861246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020166056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013355414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02303636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401176145","doi":"10.1080/1047840x.2024.2366773","title":"Social Projection Meets Social Reality: A Probabilistic Implementation of the Inductive Reasoning Model","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Inquiry","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Probabilistic logic; Projection (relational algebra); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.5401420870777613,"score_gpt":0.5801912568672705,"score_spread":0.04004916978950912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401176145","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058142575,0.00015441736,0.97610474,0.003567435,0.000072516275,0.000041249434,0.00010356409,0.00017838279,0.01396347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43300086,0.00043594785,0.5612593,0.00076242565,0.00025136292,0.00027408087,0.00021386691,0.00014546506,0.003656695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99512607,0.0029324107,0.00015066171,0.0005876231,0.0009686895,0.00023450906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851965,0.011759638,0.00052738306,0.0014149088,0.0007499586,0.0003517172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008325375,0.00065490446,0.0009734621,0.0015328499,0.0013822733,0.004559885,0.0041547855,0.0020321636,0.012608625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030848455,0.0008057377,0.0018113703,0.0018119919,0.0042507844,0.009613665,0.0054324255,0.0037892915,0.0012058911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043253433,0.000043497657,0.0005594862,0.000059195303,0.00006096158,0.00007207864,0.00046900992,0.027598005,0.00014630969,0.9372318,0.0019429215,0.031773515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014489415,0.000008868342,0.00011943398,0.0000150494325,0.00001481371,0.00003613533,0.000054702563,0.122424334,0.00011064088,0.8748927,0.0022965905,0.0000122476395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058611413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004936289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012608625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002250985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022886174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044029295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401176186","doi":"10.1080/1047840x.2024.2366813","title":"Kahneman in Quotes and Reflections","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Inquiry","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6025791707107563,"score_gpt":0.6101577821525156,"score_spread":0.007578611441759309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401176186","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034304675,0.04449595,0.010585193,0.54743934,0.04453904,0.00013649881,0.0004262585,0.0002665967,0.31780645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57159495,0.033356562,0.008518501,0.16286173,0.016295355,0.00047170295,0.00034488252,0.00089262094,0.20566373],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99292964,0.003877562,0.00027983807,0.00061432563,0.0018299344,0.00046872415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923402,0.0048580957,0.0004682929,0.00037198188,0.0015936132,0.00036786505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037399924,0.00077232654,0.0005474793,0.001313094,0.0095018735,0.006982656,0.0011819032,0.0036034966,0.0052755005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032096557,0.0003251285,0.00038418273,0.0019154607,0.0078279935,0.0057201167,0.0039732303,0.008808269,0.0030527927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006957451,0.00004093598,0.00041906573,0.00021941983,0.00001148842,0.0012887003,0.0876305,0.00016867409,0.0004549935,0.4364834,0.453456,0.019757276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029705034,0.0000064415353,0.00013025527,0.00020094318,0.0000021680191,0.00050478964,0.01675794,0.00007289064,0.00023878436,0.027481927,0.9545753,0.00002553327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039590946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004325386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0095018735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00385423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027672653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027964532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401335402","doi":"10.1037/cep0000342","title":"Updating local and global probabilities during maze navigation.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); ENCODE; Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; PsycINFO; Representation (politics); Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; MEDLINE; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.08597934004897054,"score_gpt":0.3965047750507864,"score_spread":0.31052543500181584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401335402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92602,0.0010355863,0.067925714,0.0003328652,0.00003393537,0.000043055872,0.00019433482,0.00013035754,0.004284278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98915917,0.00020454513,0.010113573,0.00003406583,0.00001371762,0.000014456908,0.000089652785,0.00001899785,0.00035182992],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992091,0.0003182616,0.00004204097,0.00021462365,0.00017003212,0.00004598095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902262,0.0063297027,0.0021731602,0.0005619377,0.00039675427,0.0003122591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019612396,0.0003300429,0.00035950213,0.0003799001,0.0001887242,0.0012691655,0.00033542656,0.0006040029,0.0019144926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031826824,0.00030856038,0.00019541627,0.00030394085,0.00068643177,0.0025455495,0.00087842735,0.0005371161,0.00022226882],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037665751,0.00032321547,0.26803792,0.0010027795,0.0007147478,0.0010726966,0.009016903,0.041825727,0.10361014,0.02531415,0.0020676353,0.5432475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023430827,0.0021863857,0.65301484,0.00020420777,0.0004059015,0.0019313178,0.0024308355,0.17166841,0.020607578,0.13856754,0.008435735,0.0003130984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012426771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016281728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019612396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020178071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031708952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010372162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401363623","doi":"10.1057/s41272-024-00499-1","title":"Tackling no-shows in fine dining: insights into cancellation policies and consumer awareness campaigns","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"Montclair State University","keywords":"Reservation; Popularity; Entitlement (fair division); Marketing; Equity (law); Dual (grammatical number); Honor; Business; Advertising; Public relations; Economics; Computer science; Psychology; Microeconomics; Internet privacy; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0684214481563083,"score_gpt":0.3858162681265433,"score_spread":0.317394819970235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401363623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95558494,0.000216615,0.0046724337,0.0025483181,0.000027222735,0.000040886516,0.0000235376,0.000014782436,0.036871236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910444,0.000045084595,0.00037112128,0.00008431896,0.0000045775073,0.000003845729,0.0000045329753,0.0000013195888,0.00038077496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986332,0.00082507374,0.000035937795,0.000096867654,0.00018039845,0.00022853901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99111944,0.0056851152,0.0017993759,0.00028995855,0.00048795162,0.00061811117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002449248,0.0001714631,0.00021110657,0.00042698972,0.0008763628,0.0024222776,0.00039983162,0.00076513545,0.0024839633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007654023,0.0001636325,0.00023427048,0.00027830014,0.0012302768,0.0013761931,0.00093752675,0.0012200797,0.00012292294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011491918,0.006719789,0.5874468,0.0007440909,0.00027004682,0.0012759989,0.035609417,0.012777456,0.012136234,0.13320357,0.0033950934,0.20527229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007431252,0.0009986487,0.7536217,0.0003921229,0.00022497243,0.0002186895,0.08673387,0.039836626,0.0049711876,0.08717429,0.025605388,0.00014825536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060440176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011819323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060440176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018499116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016642412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013422072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401613713","doi":"10.1037/dev0001817","title":"Children (and many adults) use perceptual similarity to assess relative impossibility.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Developmental Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Perception; Impossibility; Spell; Cognitive psychology; PsycINFO; Similarity (geometry); Object (grammar); Social perception; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.2218656612072493,"score_gpt":0.46263540366822625,"score_spread":0.24076974246097696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401613713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9436151,0.0059043947,0.0058934526,0.0007144995,0.00007195559,0.00012814045,0.0014242516,0.0001405112,0.04210776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98257947,0.003560973,0.009649323,0.00056743564,0.000024606099,0.0000969078,0.0007032508,0.00001810603,0.0027999275],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987961,0.0002009234,0.00016990722,0.00034326361,0.00040502075,0.000084771804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99028647,0.0036224118,0.003866956,0.00080252177,0.00093580876,0.00048577136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00199557,0.00043384917,0.00043025246,0.0020649128,0.00036051788,0.0015428065,0.00041778368,0.0009827834,0.0068185986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016558051,0.00032163458,0.0002961931,0.0011386225,0.0015265116,0.0026142944,0.0010377523,0.0007839746,0.0013411823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013454477,0.00027687513,0.8089515,0.0004909756,0.00010295579,0.0006483536,0.0056362045,0.00026832675,0.0065166075,0.007010337,0.0045493343,0.16541396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020329608,0.0005802321,0.9641778,0.00025933108,0.000055857265,0.0030187184,0.0050179935,0.0004510908,0.0027746528,0.010269786,0.013286004,0.00008822648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025299522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037384965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068185986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034901328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031513453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02281046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401765322","doi":"10.1108/ejm-04-2023-0258","title":"Slow and steady or fast and furious: how movement speed in the digital medium impacts consumers’ risk judgments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Marketing","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Popularity; Originality; Movement (music); Marketing; Risk perception; Psychology; Business; Advertising; Social psychology; Perception; Creativity","score_opus":0.0725964418911302,"score_gpt":0.33038183093264034,"score_spread":0.25778538904151016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401765322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99370533,0.0001903629,0.00057357847,0.00025790167,0.000020965186,0.000030560015,0.000042015494,0.000008574189,0.0051707155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976388,0.00016474433,0.00088345684,0.00014203312,0.0000111970385,0.00003071717,0.000036820482,0.000009261997,0.0010829635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918216,0.00038876513,0.00005370858,0.00010796029,0.00019481133,0.000072452494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99286747,0.0044376194,0.0015550503,0.00035267218,0.00047418842,0.00031310364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001310753,0.00019894473,0.0001513568,0.0002792847,0.00033953946,0.0023450984,0.00024753052,0.0005720458,0.006368242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016127212,0.00016250521,0.00032442503,0.00018430823,0.00067552633,0.0014735934,0.00075309374,0.0007287251,0.00040472197],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012206533,0.003566731,0.61570376,0.0017684363,0.00066919014,0.0010598365,0.047057703,0.0024418538,0.062132414,0.010212679,0.0053767916,0.237804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024946433,0.0023938199,0.9382845,0.00041465962,0.00063416007,0.0004467668,0.02367265,0.0044715446,0.009342168,0.006971993,0.012917533,0.00020081952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00196277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017138126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006368242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005032063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024744746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021303892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401931553","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2407","title":"Reference‐Dependent Risk‐Taking in the NBA","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Point (geometry); Prospect theory; Econometrics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Reference model; Psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.23926284374588752,"score_gpt":0.4892373095558045,"score_spread":0.249974465809917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401931553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99215746,0.00009458819,0.0024746493,0.00010673396,0.000011010804,0.000018414268,0.00013421917,0.000009904948,0.004992926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984207,0.00003992671,0.00056194724,0.000018923822,0.0000032233863,0.000010605304,0.00009916546,0.0000038511466,0.0008416385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970547,0.0015315684,0.00013917971,0.00045519302,0.00051667687,0.00030266808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98381954,0.0051887683,0.005723396,0.0021241207,0.0012720348,0.0018722031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072090235,0.00025105054,0.0007277954,0.00081893685,0.00078442594,0.002599935,0.00091270456,0.0006934217,0.004654288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026975624,0.00030931438,0.0003855702,0.0008230292,0.0011214745,0.0014155417,0.0013881756,0.0011186299,0.00095045014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021140878,0.0011913006,0.9019795,0.00009207891,0.0003563973,0.00028464184,0.0046201297,0.014920747,0.0038882913,0.020320961,0.0018097606,0.048422147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004033816,0.00052178284,0.944205,0.000047211208,0.00003843768,0.00010254819,0.0021456683,0.026542438,0.00059727504,0.02204555,0.0036327916,0.00008098625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02045729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026058313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02045729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011220531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047020367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040676475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401989579","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4940588","title":"Robust Inattentive Discrete Choice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.09152516552525311,"score_gpt":0.3837529709345422,"score_spread":0.29222780540928905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401989579","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055881444,0.00062851503,0.9218081,0.002489913,0.00026738696,0.00016643177,0.0008308623,0.00078979734,0.017137486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9081182,0.0006314289,0.059330776,0.00066047366,0.00033702247,0.00043316535,0.0004665129,0.0002816355,0.029740734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99158394,0.0044340747,0.00035344358,0.0018420938,0.0009777899,0.0008086031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9342065,0.052004274,0.0038752528,0.006357412,0.0021365369,0.0014200233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0134383915,0.00187002,0.004722332,0.001164768,0.0008075009,0.0045716567,0.0045467634,0.0035137648,0.012712506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06961286,0.0013005642,0.0017429355,0.001137119,0.0043073255,0.004648398,0.0044560456,0.005718598,0.0017315381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083590014,0.00025603644,0.0014415634,0.00030493864,0.00023988576,0.000239304,0.00032922163,0.10787524,0.0014160909,0.8577931,0.0041261814,0.025142564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011750735,0.00008269109,0.0003155971,0.000024392722,0.00004091016,0.00004279672,0.000025457573,0.5046233,0.00034886907,0.49347883,0.00087000197,0.000029677774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003431955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001471432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0134383915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002365865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018600523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07106984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402711270","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1767","title":"The erosion of rationality in high vulnerability conditions: A cognitive‐disruption perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Perspective (graphical); Vulnerability (computing); Cognition; Erosion; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Epistemology; Geology; Computer security; Philosophy; Neuroscience; Geomorphology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2494642723321248,"score_gpt":0.4555875936148406,"score_spread":0.2061233212827158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402711270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97526324,0.00042894593,0.0050338535,0.0014204527,0.000015450487,0.00003703072,0.000025512249,0.000010184118,0.017765325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99949324,0.000050575578,0.0003297945,0.0000383489,0.0000051742436,0.000007725484,0.0000047093426,0.000001051474,0.0000695025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672794,0.001656881,0.00015856039,0.00029817075,0.00078356103,0.000374891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97437143,0.016711183,0.00600362,0.001411054,0.00072435953,0.00077833363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043989117,0.00028414195,0.0003197183,0.001350569,0.0007425493,0.003208378,0.00054398144,0.000769227,0.0022252537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02627144,0.0002272112,0.00028855746,0.00076818536,0.00488051,0.001715699,0.0028959834,0.0014094441,0.0000699387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026485098,0.001784299,0.52266926,0.001054204,0.00058719865,0.003041541,0.07612504,0.016287098,0.02699061,0.22924985,0.0010643742,0.118498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013867943,0.0007756969,0.7185435,0.00030449947,0.00019012098,0.0014017806,0.03478016,0.011227236,0.0067661256,0.2200249,0.005711719,0.00013550595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019758681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017282985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043989117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018878971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013439353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023263931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402905276","doi":"10.1186/s12911-024-02681-2","title":"Decision threshold models in medical decision making: a scoping literature review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Thompson Rivers University; University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Health informatics; Medical decision making; Computer science; Management science; Data science; Decision analysis; Clinical decision making; Medicine; Public health; Medical emergency; Nursing; Family medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.12242197308065546,"score_gpt":0.44994233850075793,"score_spread":0.3275203654201025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402905276","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00091964327,0.99028426,0.0034197823,0.0021672018,0.00039826322,0.0008044237,0.00019744983,0.000019400446,0.0017895246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017461484,0.97079754,0.0077426187,0.001088652,0.0003438521,0.0020849658,0.0002574997,0.000016728016,0.00020662698],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.957298,0.023562336,0.010414203,0.0016546145,0.0063474327,0.00072344963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7379062,0.23404565,0.012966295,0.0026795242,0.011697772,0.0007044799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050034035,0.0023106623,0.005752586,0.023133436,0.0019613141,0.008239152,0.003588941,0.0057571097,0.006325726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19904898,0.0017307996,0.0074427733,0.024248293,0.0030345744,0.008565588,0.004054975,0.004259879,0.0008413273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023125915,0.00011599716,0.0009882596,0.66774017,0.0022898326,0.00022209996,0.0018704447,0.0024043836,0.00015514749,0.015527217,0.0067121168,0.30174306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057836154,0.00011480263,0.0008462642,0.9505138,0.0032803635,0.0002640668,0.0009562371,0.0010257973,0.00014479896,0.01036359,0.0323731,0.000059407466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058419765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008419253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050034035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009522931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027680222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26460838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402905744","doi":"10.1167/jov.24.10.954","title":"Object Stability, Attention, and Temporal Order Judgments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Cognitive psychology; Stability (learning theory); Order (exchange); Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Economics","score_opus":0.10833816126190135,"score_gpt":0.4263056248485938,"score_spread":0.3179674635866925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402905744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99180275,0.00013856337,0.004608037,0.000023365694,0.000010514371,0.00004960827,0.000072706185,0.000033579377,0.003260916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99559695,0.00005843029,0.0034617633,0.00002400189,0.000011745296,0.000031459094,0.00015340414,0.000025251877,0.0006371032],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879956,0.00016820194,0.000090984744,0.00033955698,0.000528873,0.00007282848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99277747,0.0038105326,0.0017367229,0.0005848369,0.0006725695,0.00041780664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015517126,0.00035916024,0.00030797906,0.0007987022,0.00033013293,0.0013918437,0.0004353375,0.00044032556,0.0023492377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018478516,0.0003094362,0.00030820462,0.00040624748,0.0004219295,0.0016086133,0.0009322948,0.00040794178,0.0001660258],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0059289006,0.00052754313,0.2823226,0.00064635836,0.0003008494,0.0005573996,0.00735524,0.0044899336,0.53990597,0.0040162746,0.0009448648,0.15300418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056634988,0.0007182096,0.9728889,0.00003067505,0.00005856578,0.0002344967,0.00053253194,0.0078118513,0.014832383,0.002175272,0.0006020033,0.000058327998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043512704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050697974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043512704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005603427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030587337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008651853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403940482","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4963318","title":"Overcoming Algorithmic Exclusion: Evidence from A Large-Scale Randomized Field Experiment on Human versus AI Decision-Making","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Randomized experiment; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Data science; Mathematics; Physics; Statistics","score_opus":0.0837047906517912,"score_gpt":0.43764472774432506,"score_spread":0.35393993709253385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403940482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97953266,0.00018994436,0.008023039,0.0011498729,0.00011261078,0.00022072146,0.00011531987,0.00006347963,0.010592399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990386,0.00014648613,0.006156047,0.001022902,0.00009178932,0.00044094562,0.00020575867,0.000064582586,0.0014854824],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.98302263,0.0120177325,0.0007589449,0.0017873313,0.0019219143,0.0004914721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6273204,0.31440154,0.023931332,0.02701511,0.0032401257,0.004091526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03271326,0.0008304161,0.0013046738,0.0006017195,0.0011199467,0.0023390641,0.0018930024,0.0027353652,0.0096708005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16864441,0.00056599546,0.00052206207,0.0005168907,0.005028447,0.0034927388,0.0016916075,0.002797086,0.001009687],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.1697696,0.080071986,0.1629195,0.005053092,0.004460944,0.00084741187,0.014308726,0.053070646,0.055818476,0.10678331,0.0177455,0.3291508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04146348,0.040120818,0.2736459,0.0006509775,0.0018658468,0.0009152778,0.0037246644,0.107168674,0.01769621,0.48571932,0.026341688,0.00068710255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014272669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010641691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03271326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059615436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014884234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17300636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404172412","doi":"10.1145/3687056","title":"The Explanation That Hits Home: The Characteristics of Verbal Explanations That Affect Human Perception in Subjective Decision-Making","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Perception; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Communication; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.1406993841255649,"score_gpt":0.42339952409040893,"score_spread":0.282700139964844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404172412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98349416,0.00021444823,0.010704466,0.00047093743,0.000019122695,0.000038990584,0.000047192156,0.00006251181,0.004948135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698997,0.00004325816,0.0026739736,0.00005364715,0.0000061329542,0.000018184883,0.000027046755,0.000016312984,0.00017140403],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934681,0.004682126,0.00035165143,0.00034732165,0.0009939696,0.00015690959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88888776,0.09228936,0.010461536,0.0040338356,0.0034240219,0.0009035113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005388251,0.00025265745,0.00017423905,0.0007926751,0.0005935268,0.0027872887,0.0003086148,0.0008867013,0.0018626676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07103784,0.00021986532,0.00028117225,0.000473129,0.0016458554,0.0021337476,0.0013102301,0.0007639625,0.00018378826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002127655,0.0003017252,0.45807904,0.0010587593,0.000326788,0.0009554513,0.298066,0.004084634,0.047517106,0.01643553,0.0019358344,0.16911153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001986975,0.0012647804,0.7352266,0.00053968333,0.0004382829,0.0016130549,0.17662244,0.018395998,0.0163617,0.029559081,0.019366736,0.0004130659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009431626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010545951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005388251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005666113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034130595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028496087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404256573","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5013140","title":"The Role of Mixed Discounting in Risk-Averse Sequential Decision-Making","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Delay discounting; Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.02885405331500812,"score_gpt":0.3631262227069926,"score_spread":0.33427216939198445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404256573","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32147807,0.0030665426,0.65623504,0.0034608303,0.0002837702,0.00010807315,0.00017559479,0.00019523608,0.014996779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94472945,0.0011793523,0.04942925,0.00019665489,0.00020930532,0.00006923503,0.000058552934,0.00006248872,0.0040655574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994585,0.0033377642,0.00030308386,0.0007746311,0.0006128405,0.00038673807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90687734,0.08082224,0.0049654967,0.0034375119,0.0019073372,0.001990096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014679868,0.0012680099,0.002239846,0.0010358365,0.00084826146,0.0053338422,0.0024079643,0.0025479428,0.004913862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077842824,0.0016128363,0.0017132955,0.0009948598,0.0030932291,0.012201579,0.0020370851,0.0040146764,0.00035666264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006055298,0.0001560003,0.0033428753,0.00028852542,0.00024762252,0.00027936907,0.0006136348,0.10274154,0.0013689518,0.8644191,0.0006177364,0.02531915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000413982,0.00007480571,0.00058204343,0.000027420665,0.000057334575,0.00004932332,0.00004107232,0.24950153,0.00023092794,0.74906236,0.00029266858,0.000039053655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028102174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018474102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014679868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017014578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015218323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07763547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404412063","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2311714121","title":"Predecisional information search adaptively reduces three types of uncertainty","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria; Max-Planck-Gesellschaft; Stiftung Suzanne und Hans Biäsch zur Förderung der Angewandten Psychologie; Saskatoon City Hospital Foundation; Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades; Fundación BBVA; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Computer science; Task (project management); Information seeking; Selection (genetic algorithm); Information needs; Data science; Information retrieval; Machine learning; Economics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.2097191521168497,"score_gpt":0.4257227571208137,"score_spread":0.216003605003964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404412063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9647503,0.00027618196,0.030150786,0.00027356241,0.000005441108,0.000045658093,0.00007244978,0.00005984217,0.004365905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99329597,0.000060077524,0.006237457,0.00002552922,0.000004181919,0.000020684844,0.00005776111,0.000009153493,0.00028915692],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965978,0.0014406906,0.0002243658,0.0007373283,0.000671557,0.00032816586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9623965,0.028031776,0.0039235894,0.0038997168,0.0008936532,0.000854877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006097611,0.00031677226,0.0007727794,0.0011532749,0.00056935276,0.0036041164,0.0010819656,0.000863215,0.0024873873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055257805,0.0005091126,0.0008027767,0.0009352678,0.0021548222,0.0040777023,0.0023792428,0.0015064277,0.00022325176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033525028,0.00086045987,0.4101249,0.0007309568,0.0009653416,0.0005635273,0.010587901,0.13683997,0.013506179,0.16005303,0.0013866063,0.2610286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002865867,0.0012065152,0.23844822,0.00015466225,0.00039931174,0.00061319367,0.0037253296,0.45420742,0.009907377,0.28574708,0.0049585793,0.0003457697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018347944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019096341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006097611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086809427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007388333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032247663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404550038","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2024.25","title":"Sunk cost predictions as theory of mind","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sunk costs; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Econometrics; Cognitive psychology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.13015267607432443,"score_gpt":0.4225366530408995,"score_spread":0.29238397696657503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404550038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7615962,0.0010227701,0.14688995,0.010261945,0.00022064219,0.00007166687,0.0001908432,0.00012465559,0.07962137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957812,0.000062524996,0.0037199506,0.00019465252,0.000017266757,0.000016927588,0.000020375815,0.0000050048643,0.00018224612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573165,0.0024581272,0.00011489185,0.00049332983,0.00095394015,0.00024804455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97567254,0.017115943,0.0028479493,0.0020138698,0.0016930803,0.0006565906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059428858,0.00041394582,0.00035548184,0.0011605809,0.00044551792,0.003206632,0.001044894,0.0011806244,0.0030255471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025421476,0.0003202494,0.00047498257,0.0005463611,0.0045281607,0.004201595,0.0012213885,0.0015697553,0.0001615076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037097587,0.00019769045,0.038029812,0.00030750158,0.0002227434,0.0003507708,0.0049043293,0.037315957,0.0027568836,0.8848233,0.0023619959,0.02835808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003422127,0.00006356594,0.012740769,0.000063325475,0.00003762079,0.000106694795,0.0008101005,0.065148264,0.00087019044,0.9184153,0.0016694285,0.000040394178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009299757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073763274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059428858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002003604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049286376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03142935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404601743","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2024.30","title":"Assessing patience and predictivity validity for mixed sign intertemporal choices","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Patience; Sign (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.24662188510376168,"score_gpt":0.45407229753884804,"score_spread":0.20745041243508636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404601743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949078,0.00010475589,0.0015618433,0.0000713501,0.000017119337,0.00006962937,0.00024718547,0.000016825577,0.0030035258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998544,0.00004006973,0.0009931859,0.000015918708,0.000009859513,0.0000678988,0.00018621606,0.0000055606247,0.00013733305],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947206,0.0022126103,0.00086435047,0.000639968,0.0013383059,0.00022425265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84980613,0.11230432,0.02427484,0.0075098244,0.0033771854,0.0027276217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013724508,0.0006059258,0.0006940852,0.0028317554,0.00043778284,0.001906819,0.0009974431,0.0011848283,0.004821551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12558825,0.00039329898,0.0015358025,0.0010815865,0.0013865498,0.0022598784,0.0016489123,0.0011863658,0.00054328114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014497052,0.0003343832,0.9834563,0.00005843869,0.00025290565,0.00008879602,0.00027143583,0.0012837143,0.00029270776,0.0008872191,0.00017059788,0.011453816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001688314,0.0014826456,0.94814837,0.00014209628,0.00019631947,0.0008595391,0.0007132958,0.034712486,0.0016544278,0.011102612,0.0007389769,0.00008043238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060769153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000949474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013724508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004405311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044782058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07258302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404620139","doi":"10.1111/deci.12658","title":"Explanation seeking and anomalous recommendation adherence in human‐to‐human versus human‐to‐artificial intelligence interactions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Loss aversion; Set (abstract data type); Sunk costs; Preference; Computer science; Recommender system; Risk aversion (psychology); Bayesian inference; Human intelligence; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Bayesian probability; Machine learning; Microeconomics; Economics; Expected utility hypothesis","score_opus":0.42825543025349877,"score_gpt":0.5369649849622157,"score_spread":0.1087095547087169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404620139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961021,0.00007223508,0.0010732784,0.00027153813,0.00000710124,0.000021497905,0.000027050955,0.00002172047,0.0024035205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983858,0.00002891227,0.0009833609,0.00008687428,0.0000059325343,0.000018058963,0.00004285444,0.0000065039617,0.00044183453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928831,0.0047587757,0.00038081297,0.000548207,0.0010128965,0.00041626373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8524037,0.121882685,0.014827415,0.005161054,0.0024423576,0.0032827284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0079245055,0.0002585161,0.00049250596,0.00064385065,0.0007649755,0.0028832091,0.00052810146,0.0014549168,0.0068600443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08946955,0.0002862121,0.00039226477,0.0004214879,0.00095716893,0.0018302518,0.0014864603,0.0019431231,0.00038035362],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003077865,0.005430116,0.82284343,0.0005864464,0.00076677353,0.00048142008,0.016321242,0.010392576,0.012193148,0.0070774867,0.0022736436,0.11855588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023537315,0.0018724869,0.9255117,0.00012607871,0.00028895316,0.00024825602,0.008622111,0.045600176,0.0027688795,0.011145163,0.0034062674,0.00017435572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002740654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003123062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0079245055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072535366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055223407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041909337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404637470","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2024.17","title":"Can simulated experience be harnessed to help people make investment decisions?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Saskatoon City Hospital Foundation","keywords":"Investment (military); Investment decisions; Business; Psychology; Marketing; Behavioral economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.13787098019811217,"score_gpt":0.4121460722090689,"score_spread":0.27427509201095673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404637470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9652744,0.00079277845,0.0128017105,0.0030247106,0.00022345739,0.00027172975,0.00014591143,0.00027600199,0.01718938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872881,0.0005600022,0.010244199,0.000344987,0.000042005096,0.00024416577,0.00006434215,0.000017279843,0.0011947773],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978842,0.0015704745,0.000077460965,0.0001225527,0.00018189472,0.00016336377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98855746,0.008983268,0.0006766243,0.000774518,0.00027477604,0.00073329685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002990559,0.00045808818,0.00034320264,0.0005163429,0.0002774021,0.001871792,0.0006156948,0.0008520473,0.009424495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024666248,0.00016199175,0.0003866236,0.00027234748,0.0010009119,0.0018010169,0.0018187861,0.0006973207,0.0008981541],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042335913,0.019446727,0.049514864,0.005277255,0.0004848562,0.0011034185,0.044838756,0.004425324,0.025538072,0.016785972,0.012641489,0.81570965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059677507,0.054466832,0.23465429,0.012061756,0.0020604506,0.0029025744,0.09385258,0.042530786,0.05143518,0.19537662,0.3037007,0.0009905327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018408975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002693795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009424495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027453422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040021449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031528115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404644679","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2024.22","title":"Individual differences in overconfidence: A new measurement approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Overconfidence effect; Psychology; Econometrics; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.28457660396373097,"score_gpt":0.39786234791837083,"score_spread":0.11328574395463986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404644679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8106075,0.005657853,0.1620744,0.0012508258,0.0006216538,0.001306749,0.002593492,0.00025231988,0.015635258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96819836,0.000508349,0.028469142,0.000304341,0.00021732914,0.0013439094,0.00046360653,0.000027254957,0.00046782204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96189046,0.023992727,0.003395731,0.0041092937,0.0061974614,0.00041434527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79384804,0.13826832,0.033893105,0.021928253,0.010247148,0.0018151588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03184549,0.000756626,0.00113653,0.0051107607,0.00074622594,0.002332204,0.0015899491,0.0012542092,0.0033251068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13865083,0.00048865646,0.0015326054,0.0051447363,0.0019809504,0.0025024572,0.0031931703,0.0027601284,0.00029182792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010684812,0.00063103857,0.82305,0.0013290745,0.0061154314,0.00023988386,0.007000425,0.0036979683,0.0023462602,0.016081534,0.0025016693,0.1359383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023338285,0.0019633924,0.89600694,0.00082920166,0.0014199611,0.00065862783,0.002500371,0.021213016,0.0026271928,0.06281465,0.009428428,0.00030488076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096421083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010356802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03184549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077323645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005276014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1684171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404993706","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2024.2434149","title":"Up and down: counterfactual closeness is robust to direction of comparison","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition & Emotion","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Closeness; Psychology; Social psychology; Luck; Outcome (game theory); Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.20871989929752488,"score_gpt":0.42354975180620025,"score_spread":0.21482985250867537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404993706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9523238,0.00054669793,0.025640856,0.0004301382,0.00009612291,0.00009306854,0.00022292367,0.00013076866,0.020515561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99543506,0.00008403036,0.0037194719,0.00015527467,0.000024679235,0.000028836306,0.00014229481,0.00005449344,0.00035593522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991744,0.0031252366,0.00037824345,0.0028672998,0.0016185944,0.0002666862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9483773,0.02741798,0.011108873,0.009328009,0.0025747411,0.001193183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008382514,0.0003540549,0.0005762579,0.00080017204,0.0004891943,0.0027748158,0.0006455859,0.0009480855,0.0044229846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.083622105,0.0006052762,0.0006445687,0.0004821258,0.002391559,0.0027401587,0.0022151996,0.0013696691,0.00040668124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016338395,0.0008833482,0.3866569,0.0015935381,0.0025935268,0.0014829763,0.017063908,0.015780037,0.26707,0.06146053,0.0038931111,0.22518376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031682578,0.0012421602,0.87077767,0.0001282065,0.00057512627,0.0012219517,0.0016813008,0.018200286,0.021833748,0.07742439,0.00629513,0.00030321785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001546742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008382514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044088502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026047858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04433149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405353140","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/r5n6f","title":"Throwing good effort after bad: Evidence for a sunk-cost effect in cognitive effort-based decision-making","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sunk costs; Throwing; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.16579791328911866,"score_gpt":0.47948252502366395,"score_spread":0.3136846117345453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405353140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935628,0.00040741503,0.001997646,0.00017561296,0.000029892077,0.000015896849,0.00008322056,0.000015174914,0.0037123484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982059,0.00013240255,0.0010162151,0.0001296516,0.000019971692,0.000015936706,0.000057778434,0.000019200912,0.00040274905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982948,0.0006411831,0.000106404805,0.00048095593,0.00033297212,0.00014376579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9708354,0.019392407,0.004203183,0.0036968587,0.0006519303,0.0012202734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004508825,0.000438264,0.0006372559,0.00042876313,0.00032309318,0.001245253,0.00041858735,0.0008240164,0.005912627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024633117,0.00039732747,0.0004892006,0.00029317848,0.0012381261,0.0009140561,0.0012145605,0.0012972758,0.00030900608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023961067,0.0056961826,0.70512265,0.0018932705,0.0028868627,0.0008057196,0.0052051763,0.0039782343,0.091367505,0.008648995,0.0011139249,0.14932041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016436583,0.0009285351,0.98731273,0.00005531317,0.0002813356,0.00016268922,0.00024081336,0.001733885,0.0033292626,0.0050598197,0.00069049344,0.00004066866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010297744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012435041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005912627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002690748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024204007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023845196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405622067","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2024.2443149","title":"Jumping to fixations: jumping to conclusions is associated with less hypothesis generation and more fixation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Jumping; Fixation (population genetics); Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.15750505677185578,"score_gpt":0.3852931347231377,"score_spread":0.22778807795128192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405622067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98732346,0.00056679174,0.003243792,0.0011030559,0.00011465095,0.000059430116,0.00026769974,0.00012062136,0.007200539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934424,0.00022307219,0.0040624524,0.0007332204,0.00007894139,0.00006965344,0.00031468543,0.000060940125,0.0010145744],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99497074,0.0014492573,0.0005787669,0.0007274429,0.0019171493,0.0003565193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.857336,0.07955235,0.04870559,0.006018111,0.0046191947,0.003768772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075036,0.00042404298,0.0005020737,0.0013579697,0.00066647265,0.0012981682,0.00048053032,0.0013972118,0.0087381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08033481,0.00039087152,0.00066618435,0.00092574774,0.0011833356,0.0011012041,0.0012051448,0.0014762889,0.00059257547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040532574,0.0008355582,0.8534025,0.00071693334,0.0011148998,0.00059331517,0.0043963064,0.0006215717,0.033703387,0.002608898,0.0057439595,0.09220938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013526985,0.00059222337,0.98511595,0.00014377214,0.00023597782,0.00068280165,0.001248206,0.0012251098,0.002905093,0.0054044873,0.002228109,0.000082984494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020863872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032631988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0087381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065553014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000501181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039683282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405692000","doi":"10.54254/2753-7102/2024.18309","title":"Emotion-impacted Decision-making under Risks","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Social Behavior Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.4357159054239492,"score_gpt":0.6293428337450291,"score_spread":0.19362692832107986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405692000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969081,0.00010554942,0.0007931948,0.00010669934,0.000009636664,0.0000097711,0.000013913795,0.000001944881,0.0020511237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992549,0.000067612695,0.000338326,0.000026637834,0.000002870684,0.0000044256294,0.000011180405,8.0433153e-7,0.00029333253],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999622,0.00019356748,0.000017050215,0.000045896093,0.000057922345,0.00006359675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914014,0.00033500796,0.00025803063,0.000045818444,0.000070625254,0.00015039316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007105132,0.00024694993,0.00016765673,0.00018585201,0.00030328985,0.0010926833,0.0001157838,0.00031984178,0.0019429706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002443008,0.00010519579,0.00030007458,0.00010928305,0.00042344898,0.00033794573,0.00046098232,0.0005637404,0.00012623469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004684256,0.0018865205,0.7018064,0.0005609101,0.00066406315,0.002209232,0.015526811,0.008891229,0.1246395,0.0121563,0.0010021859,0.12597251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010309571,0.0011140868,0.9439147,0.000092148,0.00029410125,0.00044524032,0.008315508,0.017649414,0.010582841,0.0143732885,0.0030322617,0.00008334244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009855649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013020482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019429706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032701608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029206535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0064998865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406377952","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5096511","title":"Prudence and Higher-Order Risk Attitudes in the Rank-Dependent Utility Model","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Prudence; Rank (graph theory); Order (exchange); Econometrics; Economics; Actuarial science; Psychology; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Combinatorics; Finance","score_opus":0.09200350387610859,"score_gpt":0.40311880777933334,"score_spread":0.3111153039032247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406377952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6814741,0.00074877363,0.28666437,0.0056486744,0.000082986044,0.000088363544,0.00051684136,0.00015204457,0.024623781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98077786,0.0003656497,0.008713249,0.00015010341,0.000066886736,0.000043749373,0.00011240855,0.000017890918,0.0097521935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761593,0.001422277,0.00008114248,0.00025976766,0.00023569838,0.00038528533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812888,0.014740534,0.0014616466,0.00088231877,0.0006942063,0.0009326025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005421248,0.0008895895,0.0018284067,0.0012343798,0.0007214342,0.0047172317,0.00155386,0.0030129577,0.0071935803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020734373,0.00071501196,0.00091553567,0.0011371624,0.0023233935,0.004540123,0.0013807465,0.0033872374,0.00079030794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003300905,0.00036554135,0.00611397,0.000114681505,0.00011974141,0.0004081056,0.00051841856,0.13075912,0.0005570431,0.8466043,0.0014322808,0.012676732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006468529,0.000106345164,0.0025500383,0.000028295803,0.000036520014,0.00013303087,0.00009701222,0.44716132,0.000103677005,0.5492887,0.00037661128,0.000053794975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041615404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029086552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071935803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015145555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001001251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028670669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406883415","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-81068-8_2","title":"The Psychology Behind Bad Decisions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.2191491167496161,"score_gpt":0.4647152490788309,"score_spread":0.2455661323292148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406883415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006708243,0.031191172,0.03540122,0.07714716,0.0025962368,0.00003379712,0.0001266622,0.00007043785,0.8467251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4936063,0.03961768,0.0132107,0.031154267,0.004432993,0.00018453611,0.00015508216,0.00020485629,0.41743362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987356,0.00063842244,0.000025353864,0.00011070639,0.00037449563,0.00011551861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995698,0.0033056433,0.00018302143,0.00027737886,0.00035082502,0.00018506638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024868962,0.00068914477,0.00053830695,0.0009581553,0.0012826468,0.00494777,0.00071634643,0.0030092301,0.012081937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071634394,0.00037224733,0.00025928428,0.0011459291,0.011351553,0.0050539263,0.0010503663,0.005353928,0.0025761914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007181411,0.000015014409,0.000101182275,0.000025601972,0.000005383072,0.000020272364,0.00021493607,0.000392763,0.00004322437,0.9589016,0.025126932,0.015146082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022461702,0.0000025777751,0.00011899494,0.00003342738,0.000001638926,0.000019960149,0.00007655748,0.00030476914,0.000022629441,0.9743164,0.02509747,0.0000032851638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001795144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021103604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012081937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021923503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014515746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040418148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406883430","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-81068-8_3","title":"Common Pitfalls in Personal Decision-Making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.09478779350757056,"score_gpt":0.39883302391993175,"score_spread":0.3040452304123612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406883430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015803285,0.02067871,0.27117008,0.056650534,0.0019605795,0.00009576398,0.0001907184,0.00026255962,0.6331878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63020885,0.020093327,0.1330256,0.0077318875,0.002516383,0.00043027088,0.00020581736,0.00045043777,0.2053374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559575,0.002193245,0.00015342254,0.00036751787,0.0014486044,0.00024133577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987118,0.009940913,0.0004199946,0.0014228025,0.0007974351,0.00030086178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007035081,0.00074480893,0.0007177373,0.0010327651,0.0018552939,0.0066076415,0.0013406766,0.0028928788,0.011251614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016838022,0.0004563405,0.00044161416,0.0019890734,0.010546199,0.009641593,0.0024376092,0.005560454,0.0022786832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000557332,0.00001001948,0.00006920954,0.000037979113,0.0000052225437,0.000030101797,0.00050948525,0.00055172795,0.00003969964,0.9698299,0.006022057,0.022889014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018655544,0.0000030188783,0.00005175189,0.000042374428,0.0000024714343,0.000040640825,0.00012186698,0.0010820106,0.00008338877,0.98008186,0.018484335,0.000004324723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013501201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024516059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011251614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021465274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018963622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037640452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406961552","doi":"10.1177/19485506251314071","title":"Information Prioritization Underpins the Flexible Expression of Social Preferences Under Time Constraints","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Psychological and Personality Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Incentive; Prioritization; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Social environment; Social preferences; Perspective (graphical); Bridge (graph theory); Microeconomics; Computer science; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.1700602235043279,"score_gpt":0.4631918801271725,"score_spread":0.29313165662284457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406961552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98418576,0.00011980022,0.0052582235,0.00031786447,0.0000091172005,0.000017379729,0.00005572439,0.000010280115,0.0100258095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828726,0.000035681755,0.0013175505,0.000040332172,0.0000042372226,0.0000061177984,0.000024486342,0.0000046812847,0.0002796176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985328,0.00069563667,0.00006395315,0.00023899061,0.00026509105,0.00020359011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99473935,0.0020849982,0.0012415098,0.0006519302,0.00059979124,0.00068234315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023626382,0.0002319384,0.00019392984,0.0005093094,0.00081567996,0.0023658944,0.00027729583,0.00048297262,0.0030629348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009652114,0.00022577793,0.00020134119,0.0003755331,0.0014383319,0.0009106337,0.0010674584,0.00075182813,0.0001944162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017427,0.0006170246,0.65454113,0.0003790536,0.0003624856,0.001372859,0.03294461,0.006867347,0.06723749,0.059310462,0.002177681,0.17244703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078168996,0.0005172485,0.8784212,0.00011695978,0.00012316112,0.0007190433,0.011547431,0.011830129,0.0075951503,0.078539334,0.010386674,0.00012545368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005601642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011244916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005601642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007934278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009911654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012494981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407099084","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2025.103899","title":"Subjective probabilities under behavioral heuristics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Economics & Finance","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Heuristics; Economics; Psychology; Econometrics; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.10601575220184753,"score_gpt":0.43052301643493485,"score_spread":0.3245072642330873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407099084","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13589604,0.00030037452,0.8462723,0.0012136163,0.000097375414,0.00028582787,0.00036277788,0.00013317006,0.015438512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8514872,0.00031538436,0.14419095,0.00029561462,0.0002379881,0.0005593828,0.00033831288,0.00003499018,0.0025400994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98854,0.005873705,0.00064500613,0.002454162,0.0017795473,0.0007076937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8840737,0.08296387,0.016196929,0.009166926,0.0052833306,0.0023153385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01992098,0.0013222724,0.0015210971,0.003986295,0.0008944346,0.0056679114,0.0029301585,0.0020749904,0.006046848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106436156,0.0012208825,0.0023813716,0.0021131388,0.005582177,0.008080033,0.0036615073,0.0034423526,0.00047899672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003089114,0.00019984708,0.025670992,0.00023026072,0.00047197746,0.00043330464,0.0023431801,0.0926569,0.0014392723,0.8214171,0.00089108787,0.05393716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049572227,0.00015244352,0.009726498,0.00006782314,0.00012022162,0.00015373397,0.00029428749,0.21950158,0.0005347335,0.7679157,0.0013586754,0.00012472825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00425447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025899457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01992098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002464894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017052356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105353415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407251648","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2416643122","title":"Robust inattentive discrete choice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada; Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.20003304725416718,"score_gpt":0.4302897098713761,"score_spread":0.23025666261720892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407251648","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03428906,0.00036527342,0.93717086,0.0030004035,0.00008582313,0.00013548488,0.00031689263,0.00023059595,0.024405546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83104366,0.00048270694,0.15675916,0.00047542676,0.000121822166,0.00032259367,0.00022892251,0.00009488136,0.010470831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99205995,0.0043467497,0.00035624736,0.0015447064,0.0011312333,0.0005611422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798196,0.015155962,0.0021722794,0.0015164795,0.00074937707,0.00058622274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009554741,0.0015948958,0.0017994514,0.00078664016,0.00067364686,0.004347952,0.0026756895,0.002842845,0.0066931555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037576,0.0008533323,0.0017761979,0.00090858014,0.0044216057,0.003962327,0.0030452383,0.0053121294,0.00072231475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010806837,0.00006954188,0.0006817104,0.00010183987,0.00008896171,0.00017191995,0.00029607376,0.1819661,0.0005626758,0.8031995,0.0011908803,0.011562614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036706195,0.00004198977,0.00022754636,0.00002761525,0.000015028763,0.000028878445,0.000048750437,0.43973234,0.00031577004,0.5581841,0.0013168306,0.000024476723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027114216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00203482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009554741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042776703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019755852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05053091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407259673","doi":"10.1016/j.jmp.2025.102902","title":"Probabilistic models of delay discounting: “Fixed-endpoint” psychometric curves improve plausibility and performance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; McMaster University; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Delay discounting; Discounting; Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics; Economics","score_opus":0.142699480612111,"score_gpt":0.44354796999608126,"score_spread":0.30084848938397024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407259673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5457054,0.00058876514,0.44437927,0.001777848,0.00021850642,0.000048579885,0.0003445222,0.001677762,0.005259375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97667503,0.00013570124,0.02169534,0.0001711749,0.000053820877,0.000018786073,0.00015369692,0.00019184341,0.00090461323],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983316,0.0009211416,0.00006416995,0.00039859212,0.000176954,0.00010755898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9561817,0.03237911,0.0031325133,0.006230281,0.0011661836,0.0009101504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064968476,0.0010445158,0.000800757,0.00073334255,0.00027463055,0.002770174,0.0019015407,0.0023655263,0.0036486175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07263223,0.0006278041,0.00092662533,0.00070337794,0.0010745473,0.0060765604,0.001517838,0.0032139765,0.0006021644],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038486766,0.0011779786,0.016308084,0.00035712423,0.0005731851,0.00021511022,0.0006057134,0.6408051,0.01327,0.14999299,0.005680454,0.16716558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105122,0.00020509392,0.0043125143,0.000034867015,0.00008653576,0.000069029506,0.000026573936,0.86514246,0.002157183,0.1272106,0.00056338176,0.00008673744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001729752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071142794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064968476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010549186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074211246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034359038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407402686","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5075781","title":"Selten's Horse: an experiment on sequential rationality","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Horse; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Biology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13983361039605138,"score_gpt":0.4552288270786366,"score_spread":0.3153952166825852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407402686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8515793,0.00040145312,0.08487399,0.006996727,0.0012580946,0.0012149836,0.0011591315,0.0005382063,0.05197807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96442854,0.0001766697,0.026380498,0.000838222,0.00023378986,0.0009266833,0.00021999127,0.00012770997,0.0066678296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896444,0.0072514834,0.0005859809,0.000854658,0.0012360181,0.0004274572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85784173,0.1265884,0.0034881472,0.009528474,0.0009750566,0.0015781394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014920893,0.0010478821,0.002087588,0.0006201811,0.0013344778,0.002844147,0.0015361403,0.003330587,0.019333478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08554212,0.0005775509,0.0009252143,0.00086747005,0.004481306,0.0054225186,0.002056794,0.003489322,0.0006991073],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012714155,0.003641218,0.003470545,0.0011098396,0.00054306345,0.00035395927,0.0027573383,0.023684325,0.007042887,0.8836621,0.013838487,0.047182117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008934036,0.004553775,0.0027924585,0.00016431257,0.00027604226,0.00018202404,0.00064748246,0.11662722,0.0043767258,0.8515455,0.009774433,0.0001260477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011726805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071610714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019333478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009916967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016357127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07891017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407594617","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13279","title":"Underpowered studies and exaggerated effects: A replication and re‐evaluation of the magnitude of anchoring effects","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"California Air Resources Board; National Institute of Food and Agriculture; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Anchoring; Replication (statistics); Magnitude (astronomy); Economics; Econometrics; Psychology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.2327895439360776,"score_gpt":0.47645863059627397,"score_spread":0.24366908666019638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407594617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42246276,0.06552335,0.421601,0.039709546,0.012725819,0.011843712,0.0014211383,0.0011913199,0.023521362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89361346,0.002227398,0.09477345,0.0041423216,0.0010920577,0.0029800225,0.00016802871,0.00021728755,0.00078604417],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.36384147,0.49314097,0.062435832,0.018762778,0.05991628,0.0019025606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.03937456,0.7511995,0.039558314,0.1170846,0.0518626,0.00092038605],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.639731,0.0020334416,0.0030138316,0.0046072253,0.0018570583,0.0055340836,0.0060763787,0.0048081665,0.0041218405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.88676244,0.001449591,0.0061563463,0.0027643195,0.010376942,0.0063160253,0.0048897816,0.0063020317,0.0006506432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015987901,0.0013975243,0.16642071,0.030470127,0.043866448,0.003578829,0.04153667,0.00526173,0.016089305,0.0663413,0.018381324,0.590668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009041921,0.020874597,0.30851763,0.052592527,0.08747145,0.009178231,0.020080462,0.034015596,0.08164803,0.21396764,0.16046776,0.0021441206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020119012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018067798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.360269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030052557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004495876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44427586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407595967","doi":"10.1016/j.mar.2025.100926","title":"Decoding effort: Toward a measure – and a better understanding – of effort intensity in accounting research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Accounting Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam; Universiteit Maastricht; University of Western Australia; Australian Research Council; Monash University","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Accounting; Decoding methods; Intensity (physics); Computer science; Business; Data mining; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.401533717327208,"score_gpt":0.4939215773199443,"score_spread":0.0923878599927363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407595967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55149037,0.0029472255,0.4170807,0.005764956,0.00019867088,0.0004794861,0.00040801175,0.0003104647,0.02132015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88613164,0.0009301731,0.11073824,0.00056931365,0.00015322636,0.0003897605,0.00015919138,0.000065117405,0.0008632037],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98798823,0.0074936072,0.00075277087,0.0011765854,0.0022690215,0.00031991646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9371573,0.03630255,0.0125804,0.008581248,0.0042058486,0.0011726451],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021511635,0.00086715433,0.00067913183,0.0019862254,0.0007705618,0.0048101726,0.0010154626,0.0013145186,0.002047742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073092714,0.0005436916,0.00042115775,0.0019844265,0.0035337666,0.007406582,0.0028178482,0.0024806678,0.0003040371],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054053124,0.0014635518,0.3066034,0.0012424829,0.00029235825,0.00011922756,0.01789719,0.00657197,0.032261685,0.19417019,0.0018294344,0.437008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013664746,0.001927517,0.5791385,0.0018671707,0.00022036996,0.0003863746,0.0060797813,0.055226028,0.031477798,0.30040875,0.022535339,0.0005957035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018275253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016887995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9784884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013160512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013944563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11376572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407905155","doi":"10.1037/pspa0000436","title":"Reactions to undesired outcomes: Evidence for the opposer’s loss effect.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Social psychology; Framing (construction); Psychology; Feeling; Preference; Framing effect; Phenomenon; Negativity effect; Salience (neuroscience); PsycINFO; Opposition (politics); Negativity bias; Positive economics; Persuasion; Politics; Economics; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Microeconomics; MEDLINE; Philosophy","score_opus":0.45593075665749677,"score_gpt":0.5792925075382016,"score_spread":0.12336175088070483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407905155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9314842,0.00070317806,0.0016893889,0.0014319668,0.0001595635,0.00007623635,0.00032363838,0.000018475997,0.06411332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955361,0.00032343736,0.0010039313,0.00064892607,0.00006519141,0.00006679225,0.00017152664,0.00002121681,0.0021628414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982389,0.0009975636,0.00008242223,0.00023992357,0.000334411,0.000106770276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9464633,0.038332444,0.009064461,0.0036990177,0.00079434336,0.0016465377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047930283,0.00028363365,0.00033074908,0.00050576526,0.00037694623,0.0011826729,0.0005270859,0.0009274473,0.035948306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038025357,0.00030031355,0.00032908772,0.00027236124,0.0011975642,0.000981012,0.001115136,0.001600555,0.0012166353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.026397735,0.0063787024,0.68207663,0.0018263023,0.0010814209,0.0020296688,0.011535932,0.0011457993,0.026793327,0.02735654,0.008793345,0.20458464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004717786,0.0014119722,0.97778636,0.0002448496,0.00038051422,0.0007778021,0.001995736,0.001383089,0.0015147454,0.009070061,0.0049150735,0.000048056474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059358537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000548725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035948306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020913618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021013859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12025905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407918527","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5150894","title":"Knightian Uncertainty and Bayesian Entrepreneurship","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Knightian uncertainty; Entrepreneurship; Bayesian probability; Econometrics; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Ambiguity; Finance","score_opus":0.032894695993148884,"score_gpt":0.35124482054388007,"score_spread":0.3183501245507312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407918527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6743994,0.0031557342,0.22373594,0.014890908,0.00018547493,0.00009287567,0.00025973603,0.00009573498,0.08318427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910081,0.0008447863,0.0036826504,0.00022013474,0.00010113521,0.000022957734,0.000029163348,0.000008859618,0.0040822607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807215,0.00080787146,0.00011818627,0.0003805096,0.00028522534,0.00033614298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9559484,0.035022266,0.005056042,0.001735733,0.001173405,0.0010641221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067830957,0.00037232222,0.0011863563,0.0012808138,0.0007740186,0.0036132634,0.0007605934,0.0024700593,0.006895869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060170118,0.00048530914,0.00062323443,0.0010489958,0.0035121276,0.0061953203,0.0019976746,0.0021382947,0.00054472237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013847777,0.000079380385,0.0063053914,0.00007637112,0.00008320413,0.00022921554,0.00051542453,0.028455699,0.00013450097,0.9414241,0.0016009449,0.020957429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011144706,0.000011365231,0.00092563307,0.000010872284,0.000009401741,0.00005791955,0.00009371892,0.018272644,0.0000332571,0.9801711,0.00039141363,0.00001151092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002557487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002073143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006895869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011623766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071347365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035872877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408162041","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02656-y","title":"Sunk-cost judgments across the child to adult lifespan","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University; Simon Fraser University; University of Victoria; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Sunk costs; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Sample (material); Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.08143731676681784,"score_gpt":0.453041351198806,"score_spread":0.3716040344319882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408162041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79128575,0.18795498,0.0021265827,0.0019929747,0.0003324889,0.00002803285,0.0014134754,0.000035380177,0.014830301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92239267,0.07258927,0.0017886434,0.00064506993,0.00017685455,0.000020760153,0.0006563941,0.000020979885,0.001709372],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996768,0.000053800803,0.00002682553,0.000086160006,0.0001308338,0.000025601154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939354,0.0029646242,0.0012877557,0.0002423131,0.0013307383,0.00023924626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013037607,0.00024209385,0.0004929761,0.0006371694,0.0001317517,0.00093909126,0.00030630498,0.00034000364,0.0024515942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013772665,0.00022580482,0.00029928147,0.0005545314,0.00033721325,0.0008997318,0.0003263471,0.0010227243,0.00027304245],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013704579,0.00019575853,0.27805334,0.002455867,0.00087499263,0.00037423288,0.0009737859,0.0008198911,0.005338772,0.0032944307,0.006359354,0.69988906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025604102,0.00022611483,0.97474664,0.00069356035,0.00029061642,0.00065995764,0.00062311854,0.00043999735,0.0019904806,0.0051766695,0.015087972,0.00003924893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005464354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010128151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005464354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073493907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004907692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010865092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408273049","doi":"10.1017/bca.2024.39","title":"Economic Evaluation Under Ambiguity and Structural Uncertainties","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; The Graduate School, Northwestern University; University of Alberta","keywords":"Ambiguity; Econometrics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.11257570239479595,"score_gpt":0.43621619406841794,"score_spread":0.32364049167362197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408273049","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22736323,0.008788775,0.6064593,0.042669818,0.00091836427,0.0011793671,0.00062953704,0.0001395514,0.11185205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95886767,0.0010487436,0.037723605,0.0008185715,0.00030092263,0.0002633743,0.000047761172,0.000020993813,0.00090831815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8685243,0.10458914,0.004610538,0.0047600023,0.014708211,0.0028077336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5875336,0.36843008,0.022151256,0.009501397,0.010740834,0.0016428311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09107116,0.0014826774,0.002742179,0.0028707709,0.0015927113,0.010383203,0.001869382,0.004233672,0.004154521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2902135,0.0007902473,0.0015928319,0.0024425327,0.010907502,0.0107271895,0.005076777,0.005938411,0.00032069976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047812337,0.00011530798,0.0023493313,0.00065763853,0.00032987449,0.0005194739,0.0011840226,0.14221789,0.00046111693,0.8184387,0.0014675538,0.03178098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006258664,0.00009871119,0.0005789403,0.00036450126,0.00007348646,0.000051197654,0.000375831,0.05048241,0.0004441102,0.94564515,0.0017716358,0.000051468083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017111013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010069842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09107116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075428206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004280862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4816361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408646938","doi":"10.1002/bdm.70013","title":"When Certainty Backfires: The Effects of Unwarranted Precision on Consumer Loyalty","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Loyalty; Business; Psychology; Advertising; Marketing; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06292381277000407,"score_gpt":0.4205145747289105,"score_spread":0.35759076195890643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408646938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939878,0.00016281391,0.00072313065,0.0006891099,0.000018494093,0.000007360399,0.000023140665,0.0000071366044,0.0043809745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99949574,0.000035852496,0.00013270164,0.00014838399,0.000007847319,0.0000034712882,0.000008920709,0.000002453824,0.00016455055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955149,0.0025180255,0.00024436877,0.00026570668,0.0010542012,0.00040275382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9172547,0.06211846,0.011122648,0.003677934,0.0039009927,0.0019253314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005530576,0.00015776356,0.0003391089,0.00036268946,0.0007707264,0.0031734854,0.0003995803,0.0013606423,0.0035891335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053821713,0.00023220923,0.0004171028,0.00035280472,0.0011520265,0.0018118169,0.0011674883,0.0031148025,0.00026043586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048177494,0.0015955791,0.83601665,0.00034979964,0.00060485105,0.00083660305,0.020780593,0.004923155,0.009127524,0.01342532,0.0020799094,0.105442286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009089925,0.0016224065,0.93605924,0.0002331401,0.0004448015,0.00047726286,0.020301873,0.01369283,0.0043167816,0.019641865,0.0029355919,0.0001833038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039364933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041935053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005530576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009561081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004951174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029248834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409181118","doi":"10.1101/2025.04.04.647306","title":"Individual differences in sequential decision-making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; National Institute on Drug Abuse; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.08284271355758638,"score_gpt":0.3400366456333159,"score_spread":0.25719393207572955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409181118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942368,0.000059878737,0.004756163,0.000043878088,0.0000043205673,0.000015275727,0.0001315874,0.000013369649,0.00073872955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756694,0.000039289072,0.0019187881,0.000016379405,0.0000034689206,0.000017666396,0.00017861395,0.000005500642,0.00025337015],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916697,0.00036312867,0.00005439602,0.00021787458,0.00013293725,0.000064689586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950789,0.003350571,0.00066958327,0.00044642226,0.00019929922,0.00025512988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002239491,0.00022552878,0.00032533347,0.00033096957,0.00019057098,0.0007876761,0.00020477072,0.00030000738,0.0018773155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011216656,0.00015657544,0.0002776445,0.00030735898,0.00038272876,0.00044095123,0.00034192277,0.00049935817,0.00025860214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024262303,0.0005771506,0.8267641,0.00018022314,0.00085832993,0.00024578552,0.004101054,0.026435053,0.024577698,0.007183166,0.00093705946,0.10571412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033666856,0.00033096372,0.9231168,0.000020898708,0.00006128779,0.00016154052,0.0005310072,0.055364136,0.00264228,0.016704982,0.0009795784,0.00005288954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014354064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019069376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002239491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022120285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021607032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011843741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409331128","doi":"10.1111/cdep.12546","title":"Possibility Judgments in Childhood: Is Uncertainty Monitoring the Missing Link?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Child Development Perspectives","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Link (geometry); Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06933968025993942,"score_gpt":0.3922721990038862,"score_spread":0.3229325187439468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409331128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97112566,0.0055668373,0.006622128,0.0021371283,0.000041361367,0.000014304279,0.00026759502,0.000066958186,0.014157985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962209,0.001462824,0.001778614,0.00008790619,0.000009237954,0.000008518847,0.00007045921,0.000009641913,0.0003519376],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982492,0.00055792695,0.000112903566,0.00032134872,0.0005284669,0.00023019307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98209065,0.008457874,0.005713806,0.001211977,0.0017066906,0.0008189529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038370553,0.00027451958,0.0005424558,0.0010783384,0.0004771136,0.0037298982,0.000557138,0.0010549271,0.0027571162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02627462,0.00065185316,0.00031309633,0.0009244547,0.003289135,0.003022794,0.0013739059,0.0022555871,0.00036523698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005816214,0.00049338455,0.6801547,0.0009998267,0.00021186196,0.0037371917,0.047550503,0.004531904,0.01562903,0.081085846,0.0036208376,0.16140336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002080914,0.00033753755,0.8454527,0.0009901705,0.00012928671,0.00320035,0.015550549,0.0033370394,0.010941142,0.10300006,0.016875548,0.0001647812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035096784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047784573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038370553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009844069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097222015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02029252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409516416","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2025.8","title":"Using conventional framing to offset bias against algorithmic errors","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Framing (construction); Offset (computer science); Computer science; Social psychology; Psychology; Econometrics; Mathematics; Geography","score_opus":0.22116958783016885,"score_gpt":0.4507252767246763,"score_spread":0.22955568889450748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409516416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9419894,0.00029338524,0.034198992,0.0009981479,0.000266163,0.0002498539,0.00005285744,0.0001154047,0.021835778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99004173,0.000064119704,0.009013996,0.0002143584,0.00005669812,0.00014983164,0.00001978569,0.000015654308,0.00042379828],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98883855,0.007783793,0.00051431643,0.0011279624,0.0014439845,0.0002914212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9020899,0.07431987,0.011948741,0.0075295866,0.0030025314,0.0011093413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013007775,0.00061830576,0.0004289113,0.00064828334,0.00062614854,0.0015990181,0.00062682293,0.0010131202,0.005989441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0794047,0.00029608523,0.00026697808,0.00035826466,0.0024443623,0.0017380228,0.0015905859,0.0013779576,0.00038962168],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0149704795,0.0050259675,0.09786464,0.003708566,0.0005421798,0.0011815047,0.060457934,0.010236746,0.21454975,0.19865961,0.004859663,0.3879431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004863836,0.01928984,0.24327067,0.0031286213,0.0020554299,0.001248032,0.023610262,0.061289083,0.15596761,0.3914839,0.09288355,0.0009092338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040922675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048441786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013007775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007630828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073854474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06879252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409595690","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101164","title":"Doing things intentionally: Probability raising and control","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Ideas in Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Psychology; Control (management); Psychoanalysis; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10256733902360389,"score_gpt":0.4578738178928898,"score_spread":0.3553064788692859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409595690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761218,0.00024790486,0.01031225,0.00028095886,0.000031411822,0.000054223543,0.00003166927,0.000033354045,0.012886336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99813485,0.000046512534,0.0014872298,0.00005356941,0.000009143144,0.000016128952,0.000021364029,0.000011202499,0.0002198437],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943626,0.002622427,0.00032519732,0.0010188434,0.0013315427,0.00033939313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95083374,0.032281768,0.009325972,0.004128372,0.0017468628,0.0016833182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006308664,0.00046528204,0.00040980396,0.0009459498,0.0006031035,0.002919122,0.0003963611,0.00086198543,0.0033987097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053910404,0.0004443446,0.0004871752,0.0004390673,0.003845087,0.003183912,0.0019605816,0.0014015516,0.0002140426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026563986,0.0014840148,0.6572757,0.00073828787,0.0006965514,0.0010618679,0.030445099,0.005314816,0.06532682,0.046913646,0.0014852536,0.1866016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013421194,0.00085251615,0.8811048,0.00013969201,0.0003027837,0.00086630514,0.0054094912,0.013341562,0.010182787,0.08361543,0.0038020075,0.0002484375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012659681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011977341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006308664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005520667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038073128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03336376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409758193","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/yagn5_v1","title":"Demand Avoidance in Value-Based Choice Under Risk: A Behavioral and Pupillometric Examination","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Behavioral economics; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.1448529730028883,"score_gpt":0.4307436567416938,"score_spread":0.2858906837388055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409758193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993445,0.000015592159,0.00033557555,0.000013047207,0.0000011223282,0.000010113128,0.0000087502385,0.0000014547127,0.0002697733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989115,0.000025711255,0.0006751676,0.000019220588,0.0000030716972,0.000032646527,0.00003638706,0.0000021960032,0.00029412546],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936837,0.00020147632,0.0000415477,0.00011433361,0.00022184178,0.00005244193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966897,0.0014849177,0.0009047727,0.00046564825,0.00010947202,0.00034558264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018218256,0.00029140507,0.00025830424,0.0003242593,0.00026430638,0.0006355567,0.00019010238,0.00035701794,0.0015114092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005674617,0.00020896258,0.00021814137,0.00015391319,0.0005833349,0.00040043375,0.0006365818,0.0007369667,0.00008357434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0063392725,0.014904112,0.64596605,0.00023225573,0.00031183282,0.00026962647,0.0046566334,0.0020545179,0.27092713,0.002784955,0.00038934223,0.051164355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009754539,0.003528153,0.9794008,0.000010774696,0.000041358104,0.00027410217,0.00052893965,0.00512531,0.008689786,0.0017593957,0.0005093792,0.00003451153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005487334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006530486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018218256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019772329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001676027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009634852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409885850","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112333","title":"An ordinal solution to King Solomon’s dilemma","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Ordinal optimization; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Economics; Ordinal data; Econometrics; Statistics; Geometry","score_opus":0.08090749598835148,"score_gpt":0.39206883872427095,"score_spread":0.31116134273591944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409885850","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1381768,0.0011412373,0.5573196,0.020736158,0.0005186015,0.00035932122,0.00025505567,0.00030754352,0.2811857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84493864,0.00034104157,0.12416769,0.00083545304,0.00018391814,0.00028122208,0.000059829057,0.00004605326,0.029146152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99550927,0.0027466407,0.00021991438,0.00039560927,0.00076866813,0.00035995737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99361974,0.0040932163,0.0007714815,0.0006727634,0.00044926425,0.00039348254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005032175,0.0004419768,0.00049881014,0.00079279364,0.0017281446,0.0034830684,0.0015803364,0.003316157,0.01129254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018006828,0.00035729152,0.0006391762,0.00058416807,0.004119408,0.0048976983,0.0035500845,0.0028382284,0.0009944495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003745409,0.000020186842,0.00009453451,0.000036924725,0.0000074815725,0.00006490871,0.00028368618,0.0026729545,0.0002651096,0.99180424,0.0007508052,0.003961653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000808292,0.000030695282,0.00007611813,0.00002380843,0.0000066908387,0.00007882657,0.00015600756,0.016072676,0.00024571607,0.97427547,0.008935557,0.000017614368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056880055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073267333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01129254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001546209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020408758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037777305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409986538","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/7axzk_v1","title":"Effects of initial experiences on risky choice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Alberta Gambling Research Institute, University of Calgary; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.13562861103111365,"score_gpt":0.48749342041110116,"score_spread":0.35186480937998754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409986538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99826705,0.000054267013,0.00033317634,0.00002626387,0.000009165946,0.000010591029,0.0000422132,0.000006653097,0.0012506184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980404,0.00008657456,0.0009077333,0.000036782716,0.0000085245965,0.00004074513,0.00009544933,0.000015311763,0.0007684245],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986318,0.0004193028,0.00014599704,0.00031847536,0.0002925196,0.0001920294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98559695,0.008807751,0.0015080047,0.0016078964,0.00033720315,0.0021422033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016519796,0.00047010666,0.00068086834,0.00028036008,0.00031837964,0.0014161047,0.00040339096,0.00055296073,0.005045182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013526918,0.00033989912,0.0003275,0.00018970529,0.001147466,0.00094305293,0.0019098205,0.0014965443,0.00024735878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.054581575,0.011158403,0.29166076,0.0009809914,0.0006274603,0.0013921679,0.0049369107,0.0038417364,0.49480167,0.0041266787,0.0007533241,0.13113831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054926414,0.014288744,0.9022807,0.00012215936,0.0003675968,0.00061656977,0.0010489206,0.004385803,0.06568849,0.008292063,0.0022289008,0.00013085529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006346838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092493446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005045182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038009754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003080851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01687777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409990368","doi":"10.1101/2025.04.28.650827","title":"Is the whole the sum of its parts? Neural computation of consumer bundle valuation in humans","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; National Institute on Drug Abuse; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; California Institute of Technology","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Bundle; Computation; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Econometrics; Economics; Algorithm; Finance; Materials science","score_opus":0.11650533807189031,"score_gpt":0.35634101721745204,"score_spread":0.23983567914556173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409990368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92850274,0.00033533867,0.05505891,0.0010765021,0.000021994385,0.000009837342,0.000098233686,0.00008144504,0.014815039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99100214,0.0001178378,0.0077524288,0.00006124338,0.0000053251583,0.0000034862546,0.000030443593,0.00001427532,0.0010128971],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987555,0.00003649001,0.000003070199,0.000050095925,0.000020085274,0.000014559946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997727,0.00007644409,0.00005132855,0.00003660615,0.000025748572,0.000037070873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036312226,0.00009363252,0.00013736197,0.00014356646,0.00010838256,0.00087998476,0.00013338884,0.0002567199,0.0017869243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017745856,0.0001886258,0.00014789966,0.00012850508,0.00078913325,0.0013918133,0.00032848687,0.00031876567,0.00015917578],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009451489,0.00015725223,0.10133618,0.00025926757,0.00049628044,0.00076509546,0.0043420247,0.03261563,0.35197112,0.1438104,0.0051800283,0.35812163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052639327,0.0002682324,0.3850075,0.00008642771,0.000098451965,0.0010776633,0.0012981063,0.14397849,0.022460157,0.4367564,0.00882722,0.000088709545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010837007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010833133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0017869243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001976524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001230347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0059778094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410105204","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106166","title":"Who benefits from debiasing?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fondation Fyssen","keywords":"Debiasing; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1522446181558466,"score_gpt":0.4132383597284898,"score_spread":0.2609937415726432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410105204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78384036,0.011552435,0.0073407865,0.06380908,0.0006355258,0.000054777047,0.00027693115,0.00008638506,0.13240376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935307,0.0010722288,0.0007845638,0.0018863176,0.00025397513,0.000008684586,0.000028245762,0.000013355033,0.0024219123],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821544,0.00094597443,0.00007583686,0.00012997819,0.00026787785,0.00036498887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97995627,0.012284056,0.0031394397,0.0015005401,0.0013155594,0.0018041685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00381167,0.00025233848,0.0005315234,0.0007276419,0.0007523947,0.0026846027,0.0004615724,0.0021165502,0.01314937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027703479,0.00012484143,0.00040183845,0.0004447194,0.0022178981,0.0030459072,0.00078329095,0.001398234,0.0011262514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024552576,0.0020172242,0.24841738,0.0007177577,0.0006131253,0.0017068167,0.0027231888,0.0027185262,0.0042799,0.19042894,0.025915323,0.51800656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025876224,0.0007637153,0.20804544,0.00069401093,0.0005008508,0.0024674118,0.010752035,0.008889323,0.0036151644,0.73101085,0.032871652,0.00013076268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010056754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021409497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01314937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006161568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008640519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043989062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410211897","doi":"10.1080/19345747.2026.2682772","title":"External Validity Bias of Purposive and Random Site Selection When Sites Can Opt Out: Evidence from the Head Start Program","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bell (Canada)","funders":"Institute of Education Sciences","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Selection bias; Head (geology); Head start; Statistics; Site selection; Psychology; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Law; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.5488848819157832,"score_gpt":0.5824548225167185,"score_spread":0.03356994060093532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410211897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83014405,0.011585405,0.07101806,0.016711822,0.001985925,0.014999973,0.0026466425,0.00028979912,0.050618276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97107744,0.0009464479,0.013855572,0.005303192,0.00036513797,0.0054063853,0.0006511709,0.00017926133,0.0022153296],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.34007818,0.566629,0.020884879,0.018172234,0.04864072,0.0055950484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.055511504,0.82974803,0.042785127,0.05967554,0.010318652,0.0019611814],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4550948,0.0011443965,0.0030568836,0.0023271455,0.0030823483,0.0050554923,0.007817945,0.0077735637,0.009567321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7587475,0.0016737522,0.0047109383,0.0043608127,0.01687892,0.006158526,0.006383525,0.0067250403,0.0014115148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02732323,0.0071565756,0.6302035,0.0080096545,0.010666206,0.00076492457,0.033519194,0.0038615372,0.00045188048,0.04101157,0.02170583,0.21532604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021445556,0.013909651,0.6901918,0.019974412,0.013475957,0.0019315238,0.017235717,0.026236914,0.008206123,0.13592982,0.050742935,0.000719601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010573571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008372215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5449052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044124126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011800932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6719651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410344498","doi":"10.3758/s13414-025-03084-9","title":"Reducing the low prevalence effect: Does similarity search translate to binary decisions?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Psychology; Binary number; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Communication; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.06338854389383163,"score_gpt":0.4271059002496588,"score_spread":0.36371735635582714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410344498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85588986,0.00088892115,0.11108062,0.0070021427,0.00026294257,0.00010705101,0.0002681041,0.0004504962,0.024049882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98373705,0.00012248385,0.014013706,0.00054950913,0.000085868705,0.000026346794,0.00007349007,0.000098313285,0.0012932532],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978229,0.0009929363,0.000111552356,0.00048261767,0.00038315475,0.0002068353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9654218,0.02683409,0.0018587075,0.003619748,0.0012605324,0.0010051111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004430653,0.00040180687,0.0008751362,0.00056392705,0.00043672178,0.0019192887,0.000890136,0.0016779221,0.013030703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069364235,0.00043636977,0.00045950824,0.0004559996,0.0012884812,0.004941977,0.001578017,0.002132157,0.0012876053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0051894616,0.003855322,0.1239113,0.0012389658,0.00065917353,0.00039185243,0.0013126722,0.017841406,0.111529045,0.17961872,0.009850662,0.5446015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085866154,0.0021698205,0.19486322,0.00024719266,0.00055124925,0.00092585175,0.0009604565,0.20512281,0.02962886,0.55770504,0.006818205,0.0001486453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014474846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015899575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013030703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042875003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007962021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043592036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410346241","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/4dynh_v1","title":"What Makes a Decision Fair? Relative Earnings, Gender, and Justifications for Couples’ Decision Making","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Economics; Business; Actuarial science; Psychology; Accounting","score_opus":0.2408080043185134,"score_gpt":0.4574832723146353,"score_spread":0.2166752679961219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410346241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.958812,0.00059676234,0.009119372,0.0039721355,0.00006900809,0.00004411954,0.000039193455,0.000011161893,0.027336184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989329,0.00006921919,0.00070298475,0.00006622949,0.000012447856,0.000006333156,0.000009675835,0.000002781341,0.00019731504],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880685,0.009121909,0.0004684381,0.00044787664,0.0012807393,0.00061258685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9503267,0.036259882,0.00754283,0.002049086,0.002058559,0.0017629304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018352827,0.00029837663,0.00033064882,0.0009463302,0.002158693,0.004078915,0.00043861425,0.0012984506,0.0038846277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07156414,0.000233484,0.00038863678,0.00063943025,0.004371581,0.002623263,0.0017417761,0.0015986231,0.00025208696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015933599,0.0009830378,0.44730997,0.00044445516,0.00050161226,0.001486574,0.11068485,0.0061992207,0.0037052112,0.23251295,0.0026033057,0.19197549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024289564,0.0006707759,0.302094,0.0006313152,0.00028617206,0.0009946837,0.10699342,0.026882712,0.0031815248,0.53825253,0.019526975,0.00024290537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027367235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003307348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018352827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014453923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014396118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097060144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410359562","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2022.00304","title":"Using AI and Behavioral Finance to Cope with Limited Attention and Reduce Overdraft Fees","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Overdraft; Behavioral economics; Business; Finance; Actuarial science; Economics","score_opus":0.12849858642739093,"score_gpt":0.44677504819091796,"score_spread":0.31827646176352703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410359562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9455848,0.0002150576,0.03890933,0.0020955985,0.00006873693,0.00024909177,0.00013893773,0.0005916604,0.012146735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882237,0.00005356261,0.010018587,0.00025208015,0.000022932061,0.00018850874,0.000065831504,0.00001992655,0.0011548826],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.996958,0.0020331375,0.00012530152,0.0003112136,0.00035772283,0.00021467444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520446,0.0395014,0.003971423,0.0023571046,0.00061600853,0.0015094348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005679163,0.00057631725,0.00064776425,0.000746778,0.0005404119,0.0016944258,0.0011197072,0.0012113901,0.0068895468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049780224,0.0002019243,0.00033965422,0.0007215617,0.0009143532,0.0018810208,0.0008682076,0.0012258663,0.00070942595],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00643892,0.026314626,0.17200738,0.001384273,0.00073173456,0.00042237682,0.005711987,0.12839791,0.023184713,0.036517683,0.0095381765,0.5893503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003107961,0.018657742,0.20567513,0.00026439215,0.0005620697,0.00034232548,0.0031915926,0.6039167,0.016385045,0.12687089,0.020763956,0.0002622286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017019463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068895468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091577956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012077033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030034602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410455261","doi":"10.1152/jn.00563.2024","title":"Indecision under time pressure arises from suboptimal switching behavior","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Neurophysiology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Stimulus (psychology); Psychology; Econometrics; Cognitive psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.07470895694054341,"score_gpt":0.38633868561251494,"score_spread":0.31162972867197153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410455261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9763832,0.00009056163,0.013878611,0.0005733466,0.000025503066,0.000028227518,0.00007147937,0.000081407394,0.008867723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978084,0.000025150468,0.0016890686,0.00008933332,0.000008246973,0.000012871011,0.00003091307,0.000013644371,0.00032250152],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843746,0.00047685363,0.00009946414,0.00034190723,0.00036751726,0.0002766695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875996,0.0057055727,0.002973168,0.0019788707,0.0005697237,0.0011730355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025928817,0.0004076722,0.00052476715,0.0004480172,0.00056962576,0.0019080552,0.0007263297,0.0013782168,0.0047704065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019250967,0.00032122302,0.00036352355,0.00035472604,0.0015815956,0.0018347716,0.0019714648,0.0020152759,0.0004374326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0060311267,0.0014810786,0.25710267,0.00072347536,0.00070299883,0.006063317,0.004853439,0.06942822,0.24571934,0.24485435,0.008471584,0.15456836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030442,0.0011106078,0.19155408,0.00011712408,0.00018795219,0.0033691323,0.002616681,0.28544796,0.022628412,0.48699266,0.005434863,0.00023614382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070846354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006697653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047704065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007490869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000747734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015958548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410489681","doi":"10.1016/j.tics.2025.04.004","title":"A timeline of cognitive costs in decision-making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Trends in Cognitive Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Timeline; Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.4353459263007651,"score_gpt":0.5888044144914303,"score_spread":0.1534584881906652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410489681","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00082677294,0.990326,0.0028186678,0.0018643241,0.00035104304,0.000009473969,0.000056417164,0.000011972336,0.0037354052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017823095,0.9760534,0.0031431543,0.0012296245,0.00067910587,0.000046195364,0.00006961224,0.0000112133075,0.00094468624],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904615,0.0003093553,0.00009963666,0.00015562499,0.00032806164,0.000061010614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992576,0.005809089,0.00066567474,0.00017449744,0.0006511747,0.0001236327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019661617,0.0008907057,0.0013800057,0.0017429787,0.00026705881,0.0021829782,0.0011481025,0.0013828363,0.0038885395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009059347,0.00036254618,0.000529476,0.002432119,0.0014215641,0.0030735796,0.0008651039,0.003104572,0.00079570455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019326735,0.00004669921,0.0005076483,0.017169597,0.00023238397,0.000072628514,0.00014183094,0.0017329984,0.0007354406,0.11996802,0.011910792,0.84728867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007916039,0.0002796405,0.009943768,0.023703681,0.0010270871,0.0010746811,0.00041556187,0.0023957535,0.0016167496,0.31173685,0.6476171,0.00010994715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027181325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033394673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038885395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022211347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026601017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016115546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410529655","doi":"10.1016/j.semperi.2025.152051","title":"Perinatal decision making as a decision scientist","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Seminars in Perinatology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Clinical decision making; Intensive care medicine","score_opus":0.07389584849984555,"score_gpt":0.4781563051040902,"score_spread":0.40426045660424464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410529655","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000054759792,0.99544334,0.0003413549,0.0029942575,0.00037077832,0.0000023984035,0.000006104921,0.0000022261586,0.00078485504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016207861,0.99515367,0.00044269214,0.0016477313,0.00080569886,0.000010383125,0.000008634469,0.0000019530555,0.00030841577],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986014,0.00075457635,0.000120592915,0.00012864378,0.00032069598,0.00007409906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99006253,0.008574603,0.00034106485,0.00011727415,0.00068196544,0.00022257461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043197363,0.0011407711,0.00208164,0.0020362139,0.00033793336,0.0022295818,0.0010656995,0.003238551,0.0033638396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0089735985,0.00037120582,0.0005345015,0.0032389422,0.0020829975,0.0024617082,0.0010568706,0.0048689973,0.0008279588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088193854,0.00008859909,0.00033630684,0.0170441,0.00020389755,0.0000917329,0.00009907631,0.00084037555,0.00013728674,0.05163856,0.052375518,0.87705636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010900998,0.000102137295,0.0019567625,0.03838267,0.00045098556,0.0005826441,0.0002829894,0.0009929104,0.00025896527,0.12761359,0.82920086,0.00006640093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003190088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062723095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043197363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027207383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005134306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022845268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410543962","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02713-6","title":"Evidence for some form of abstract logical intuition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Intuition; Psychology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3690713961149358,"score_gpt":0.5045738420001691,"score_spread":0.1355024458852333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410543962","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16111434,0.109475404,0.15657218,0.15400332,0.009188772,0.000271473,0.0028985178,0.0008089632,0.4056671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8999622,0.029250912,0.025814215,0.029400285,0.0028470205,0.0001756011,0.0016440488,0.0001226554,0.010783058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980544,0.0004912988,0.00020135424,0.000394851,0.00073086924,0.00012726823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96074,0.026625572,0.0034211276,0.004423489,0.004164789,0.00062509376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005744573,0.00040603997,0.00058780285,0.00194442,0.00033348028,0.002249589,0.0011838435,0.0016656672,0.020357504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039727442,0.00027857543,0.0008605976,0.0009675006,0.0024883635,0.004488879,0.0014818495,0.0025575673,0.0020012485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002551128,0.00042223575,0.011572757,0.00477855,0.0012903605,0.0008801797,0.00071603025,0.0016570975,0.005597776,0.6167969,0.05574036,0.29799658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037899002,0.00026462812,0.01308669,0.00073642115,0.00039734936,0.0007644056,0.00021041893,0.0015368315,0.0029038186,0.8725563,0.10710307,0.00006109208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037492532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030085174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020357504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073493697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011328863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06810266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411006547","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12406","title":"Earnings Disclosures and Investor Judgments: The Joint Effect of Incidental Affect and Emotion‐Understanding Ability<sup>*</sup>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Perspectives","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Earnings; Psychology; Joint (building); Business; Accounting; Communication","score_opus":0.061525651496332386,"score_gpt":0.3578897002055685,"score_spread":0.2963640487092361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411006547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968027,0.000040727642,0.00016320383,0.00005827587,0.000011263771,0.000013659743,0.000037322174,0.0000030957474,0.0028696565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897146,0.0000336882,0.00035507497,0.000055566827,0.000013050747,0.000022171336,0.00003962878,0.0000047297967,0.0005047323],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901617,0.0004585201,0.000068456706,0.00013622009,0.00023571741,0.00008488652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779319,0.016388688,0.0037092518,0.0007948845,0.00040201104,0.0007732407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015451206,0.0002832275,0.00022947301,0.00019091199,0.00031430522,0.0016864744,0.00018025612,0.0004950702,0.0035135313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0153427925,0.00017187757,0.00018195549,0.00014360904,0.0005185795,0.0005115852,0.0007841684,0.00074933073,0.00023838687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018039484,0.009387763,0.68419254,0.00052679994,0.00050905073,0.0008765584,0.009634839,0.0024028844,0.1919044,0.004509731,0.0016494825,0.07636646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012429353,0.0012500439,0.9839295,0.000029852927,0.0001408993,0.00013263634,0.0011750094,0.0017884489,0.009056027,0.0015750648,0.00075206446,0.000046152003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005444213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008146422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035135313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024136047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018843704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011753976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411007051","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70000","title":"Higher‐pitched voices are perceived as financially trustworthy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Trustworthiness; Perception; Psychology; Risk perception; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07755412290037801,"score_gpt":0.43577947062635936,"score_spread":0.35822534772598136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411007051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99247265,0.00021786566,0.0009216083,0.00014523766,0.000043544882,0.000012937819,0.00003214861,0.0000085595275,0.0061454377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988732,0.00014015025,0.0004033257,0.00006250214,0.00002649447,0.0000056828126,0.000024147059,0.0000053484046,0.00045903897],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988869,0.0003758657,0.0001064931,0.00010311296,0.00043960614,0.00008807665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98790747,0.0047792853,0.0050247093,0.00039224068,0.001048186,0.000848214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015607725,0.00030472892,0.00024287296,0.00047020166,0.00039233302,0.002050041,0.00014351048,0.0007416536,0.006510728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015303278,0.00022808656,0.00026670232,0.00014309098,0.0007176819,0.00090536935,0.0010414633,0.00063912594,0.00041786057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006170748,0.0005095132,0.5778155,0.0015690944,0.0010493428,0.003842105,0.080766,0.0016213417,0.22242779,0.0033705216,0.0017410705,0.099117026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016264673,0.0011299185,0.94628584,0.0003295612,0.00033212954,0.0019295953,0.033141166,0.0017623133,0.0070575774,0.003829911,0.0038551313,0.00018418359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007053726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007414098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006510728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019840655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012978085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02178055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412055620","doi":"10.1145/3719160.3735655","title":"Values in the Loop: Designing Interactive Optimization with Conversational Feedback","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Feedback loop; Computer science; Loop (graph theory); Human–computer interaction; Control theory (sociology); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Control (management); World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07985621415196145,"score_gpt":0.38552600601176634,"score_spread":0.3056697918598049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412055620","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037548926,0.000071986615,0.95497483,0.00027308852,0.000032459106,0.00022396226,0.00002814593,0.0010399278,0.0058067134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5972351,0.00006900312,0.39892045,0.00016500003,0.000026322294,0.0008847723,0.000068787755,0.00045671873,0.0021738978],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99339724,0.005104254,0.00014480994,0.00058569724,0.0004577813,0.00031018577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717998,0.026030893,0.00050518865,0.0006490856,0.0005499365,0.0004650196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062736645,0.0017354938,0.0007893163,0.00055713457,0.0012401184,0.002680254,0.0022728227,0.0020405885,0.010150064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032660868,0.0011358405,0.0007320818,0.00030282728,0.0023141317,0.0048560253,0.0036378996,0.0016748696,0.0013040775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032622612,0.0019671398,0.0048757927,0.002039374,0.00028243446,0.0013672294,0.04580177,0.34776294,0.06364939,0.15350644,0.0062866826,0.36919847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038311386,0.00066888164,0.0003268881,0.00017360004,0.00013040028,0.00013085973,0.0025173707,0.8367176,0.018879363,0.12802601,0.011937002,0.00010888578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007912193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009183532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010150064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066595484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097483804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033955395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412459220","doi":"10.1167/jov.25.9.1880","title":"Deep Reinforcement Learning's Struggle with Visuospatial Reasoning: Insights from the Same-Different Task","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Reinforcement learning; Reinforcement; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03132511678826457,"score_gpt":0.34724241570343756,"score_spread":0.315917298915173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412459220","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4287981,0.0013212997,0.5541193,0.003607487,0.00009730419,0.000074900636,0.00015690501,0.0005047789,0.011319924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9389863,0.0003801487,0.057720143,0.00020953082,0.000043723623,0.000048135313,0.0000892109,0.000049527076,0.0024732372],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995369,0.00021390253,0.00002409515,0.00008319215,0.000086951135,0.000054987813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695563,0.0022918477,0.0001947398,0.00019354429,0.00019423511,0.00017003414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015293049,0.0004840488,0.0005510894,0.000256004,0.0002788922,0.0008152906,0.00083998725,0.0010239186,0.0013954093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008025333,0.00023371205,0.000412124,0.00023298008,0.0013865299,0.0012828264,0.0009924949,0.0021007604,0.00015401345],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044562208,0.0004316041,0.009022255,0.0003604343,0.00011914967,0.0004991552,0.0009276196,0.749175,0.014092278,0.06965645,0.0038068413,0.15146351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013620834,0.00005285603,0.00066464586,0.000010242632,0.0000038578264,0.000034883567,0.000033410324,0.9654029,0.0013845626,0.031759605,0.00063130696,0.000008003771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035744724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002363087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035744724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069539284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059317506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008087814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412530079","doi":"10.1038/s41467-025-61960-2","title":"Estimation-uncertainty affects decisions with and without learning opportunities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Communications","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Israel Science Foundation; Carnegie Mellon University","keywords":"Estimation; Computer science; Econometrics; Data science; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.15519798356545453,"score_gpt":0.4369713376031308,"score_spread":0.2817733540376762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412530079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860876,0.00023039222,0.011310957,0.00022544122,0.000019404624,0.000026063113,0.00038970954,0.00007852655,0.0016320142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99601835,0.00006951417,0.0030765734,0.00006091853,0.0000070055203,0.00002517944,0.00042975554,0.00002592378,0.0002867598],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981179,0.0008225305,0.00013879208,0.0005273711,0.00021317803,0.00018028267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783958,0.016567763,0.0022258395,0.0016866327,0.00047224757,0.00065175915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038993445,0.00048400337,0.0006898025,0.0003263922,0.0003144164,0.002245812,0.00069882884,0.0009825423,0.0029646885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033868443,0.0003122173,0.0006527925,0.00028213867,0.0009218327,0.0019163705,0.001149249,0.0016260582,0.00029393192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008393877,0.0013908647,0.4764987,0.0008783609,0.0011492842,0.0005461122,0.0014784612,0.30438012,0.056337293,0.0251724,0.003454323,0.12032022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001884128,0.0009212307,0.29364783,0.00015261496,0.00037944442,0.00037392505,0.00041178972,0.62216157,0.014307967,0.06433386,0.0028695306,0.00025186536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019879597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021540483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038993445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072590134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053052977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020621955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412557757","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5361638","title":"Speaking of Inflation: The Influence of Fed Speeches on Expectations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Inflation (cosmology); Economics; Monetary economics; Keynesian economics; Physics; Theoretical physics","score_opus":0.0732826693842516,"score_gpt":0.39193106678777734,"score_spread":0.31864839740352574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412557757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99000365,0.0002424002,0.0008784929,0.0010713713,0.00006530917,0.0000068980066,0.00018918014,0.000023661107,0.0075189793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987696,0.0001165399,0.00010591729,0.00010645846,0.000055962817,0.000003671414,0.000091689384,0.000025877302,0.00072426384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989563,0.0006075121,0.00005265163,0.00013535985,0.00012168703,0.00012640616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93733823,0.055525597,0.0033238002,0.0007712881,0.0010100029,0.0020310436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030133317,0.0002784918,0.0006155035,0.00032546654,0.0003847754,0.004632681,0.00034379849,0.001478297,0.0059897024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05252164,0.00034586448,0.0003453049,0.00038148445,0.00057500234,0.0010625023,0.00071698526,0.0022694233,0.0010998762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.029037625,0.0035025652,0.63055867,0.000752972,0.0013498056,0.0032958984,0.0095110405,0.058993135,0.074124336,0.051772114,0.01580967,0.12129219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004010901,0.0008531143,0.8629291,0.000075904005,0.00048405537,0.00041824832,0.0022126455,0.08669992,0.005083366,0.038785245,0.0019051782,0.00015221995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020776757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011485683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059897024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041655445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003802978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020037532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412588131","doi":"10.1007/s11238-025-10073-9","title":"A duality between utility transforms and probability distortions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Duality (order theory); Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Utility theory; Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.10523689138528741,"score_gpt":0.41825811575637145,"score_spread":0.31302122437108404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412588131","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08757877,0.0009684669,0.84863263,0.0023985861,0.00018161033,0.00008714623,0.00021385401,0.00011088592,0.059828047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933864,0.00071979576,0.05871507,0.00039502594,0.00022243118,0.00012213553,0.00011025622,0.00006143486,0.0057898336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960037,0.0016955982,0.0002634827,0.00065136154,0.0011338105,0.00025211665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99187464,0.0045758346,0.0011080264,0.0011927896,0.00092499034,0.00032372106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037336901,0.00065329636,0.00064221496,0.0011545472,0.0006850649,0.0036114806,0.00081775157,0.0009844918,0.0070628887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016945595,0.00035484816,0.0010576039,0.0010929836,0.0053297,0.010447482,0.0027603353,0.00308116,0.0006687868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017037624,0.000013554515,0.00021578254,0.000015321999,0.0000071448667,0.00004003867,0.000084477564,0.0021177304,0.0002847667,0.9917875,0.00016382089,0.005252795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009886852,0.000028660059,0.00019350421,0.00001332941,0.000006173425,0.0001379473,0.00004561535,0.008658353,0.0004343419,0.9885257,0.0019348715,0.000011556928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048212352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024007913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070628887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015615477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082946237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023627698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412721440","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2025.2536581","title":"Jumping to conclusions predicts truncated searches even in uncongenial contexts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Jumping; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.08133237262939795,"score_gpt":0.41803366666766867,"score_spread":0.3367012940382707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412721440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986645,0.00003437023,0.00015338261,0.00003410188,9.586984e-7,0.0000044359576,0.000019555871,0.000002937615,0.0010857004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992028,0.000044599994,0.000417289,0.000014965221,0.000002039065,0.000004762353,0.000085979314,0.000004912758,0.00022269839],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992949,0.00015561772,0.00009901829,0.00014817246,0.00019897545,0.00010338829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820005,0.008888275,0.0058576856,0.0013983772,0.00051283196,0.0013422886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015862454,0.00022549523,0.00024879805,0.00094106304,0.00037560487,0.0021302649,0.00037966896,0.0008229147,0.004482376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020077731,0.00034289164,0.0003092454,0.0005604174,0.00075544347,0.0012724694,0.0011238904,0.0010617716,0.00043687754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006665618,0.0005712969,0.96781164,0.00010975885,0.00018491512,0.0003770044,0.0028704472,0.0008729363,0.007950675,0.001902146,0.00022461638,0.01645794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024120263,0.00024265675,0.98893285,0.00004145928,0.00007013305,0.00028680052,0.0011537204,0.0031709438,0.00085959263,0.004794324,0.00039797017,0.000025425106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012170665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002850312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004482376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023175975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027397598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014995098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412946543","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106277","title":"When metrics matter: How reasoning in different metrics impacts judgments of uncertainty","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.10502722961546704,"score_gpt":0.38219777149260753,"score_spread":0.2771705418771405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412946543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8753598,0.0016599821,0.061559163,0.010310642,0.00028032323,0.00011275677,0.0003188543,0.00020306538,0.050195355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910409,0.00016961944,0.0074478914,0.00054267666,0.000049958562,0.000026973994,0.0001048939,0.00012042821,0.00049667194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821911,0.010752434,0.0006913559,0.002181821,0.0032866942,0.00089659344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8755041,0.09933529,0.008882723,0.0062738005,0.0068852063,0.0031190077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016060539,0.0006297601,0.00088545174,0.0023309584,0.0009844258,0.0122912135,0.0014836087,0.0041016606,0.0070821433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18928675,0.00079678383,0.0009790284,0.001864808,0.0046081347,0.016114634,0.0030454916,0.0038786337,0.0008251069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040626214,0.002551741,0.2534821,0.0013067211,0.002391207,0.0010314686,0.032276127,0.031415943,0.028677994,0.37685958,0.012751543,0.253193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021892847,0.00031828246,0.12953904,0.00032849045,0.00059326366,0.00034051342,0.0059516863,0.05378247,0.0048795724,0.7976597,0.0060963137,0.0002917737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004882027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037584244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016060539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018724647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001845916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084937274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412954780","doi":"10.3390/jrfm18080433","title":"Hot-Hand Belief and Loss Aversion in Individual Portfolio Decisions: Evidence from a Financial Experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bentham-Moxon Trust; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Loss aversion; Portfolio; Economics; Psychology; Actuarial science; Financial economics; Finance","score_opus":0.06118379063070264,"score_gpt":0.3531415984111768,"score_spread":0.2919578077804742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412954780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99886656,0.00002773847,0.000559487,0.000040139676,0.000004708204,0.00001200774,0.000012930426,0.0000051868287,0.00047123994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985084,0.000037614132,0.0010607946,0.00007500401,0.000007050239,0.000031350944,0.000022505581,0.0000045853117,0.0002527586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989017,0.0006183501,0.00006989222,0.0001843722,0.00015063255,0.00007501309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97487324,0.01716609,0.0046144435,0.002071402,0.00026458007,0.001010243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047340184,0.00032455465,0.00037255048,0.00020820486,0.00024343538,0.0010925786,0.00033972983,0.00087187643,0.002536642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02208938,0.00028638597,0.0002569109,0.00012974795,0.00094904983,0.000747272,0.0005616152,0.0011835583,0.00021363482],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.055514026,0.034567486,0.40883204,0.0013253194,0.0014609509,0.0010107877,0.009400306,0.01339463,0.33065373,0.012438226,0.0015894735,0.12981303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026559057,0.03721815,0.8452817,0.00016513641,0.0005799018,0.0007124555,0.0013114752,0.03326894,0.048692677,0.026294358,0.0035123783,0.000306906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038297952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036722212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047340184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018286721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017709452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025036216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413079922","doi":"10.3982/te5799","title":"Anticomonotonicity for preference axioms: The natural counterpart to comonotonicity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Axiom; Ambiguity; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Preference; Ambiguity aversion; Subjective expected utility; Variation (astronomy); Mathematics; Arbitrage; Risk aversion (psychology); Economics; Computer science; Financial economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.08505154140543643,"score_gpt":0.39912897660677527,"score_spread":0.31407743520133885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413079922","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088732064,0.0012796054,0.78292483,0.0098961005,0.00047307872,0.00012898893,0.00052726775,0.0002425613,0.11579562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87442935,0.00074880396,0.116933614,0.0021641124,0.00057924807,0.00020826845,0.00025892275,0.00007926585,0.004598326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994591,0.001942063,0.00060512853,0.001112049,0.0014090479,0.00034070635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98312044,0.00911951,0.0016290915,0.0028048374,0.0027581325,0.00056808814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068548284,0.00049463107,0.0008611295,0.0010934685,0.0016076227,0.002454856,0.0012018466,0.002046457,0.0051729553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019237386,0.00045372322,0.0013461277,0.0011946247,0.008989089,0.007976777,0.0020934916,0.0042357766,0.0005502814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038644007,0.0000067941137,0.00008926935,0.0000132761725,0.0000039340666,0.000021873058,0.00006323453,0.0002586639,0.0001244564,0.9971015,0.00030988886,0.0020031785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009172067,0.000012370444,0.00014547123,0.000010407714,0.0000038123367,0.00007290003,0.000041609226,0.0018857262,0.00018138044,0.99482274,0.002804342,0.000010168472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015245716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013295993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068548284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015299406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017866342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03625226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413301883","doi":"10.1007/978-3-0348-0692-3_84-1","title":"Noncommutative Choquet Theory: A Survey","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Operator Theory","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Noncommutative geometry; Mathematics; Pure mathematics; Algebra over a field; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14204643408497225,"score_gpt":0.405006721419416,"score_spread":0.26296028733444377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413301883","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044394885,0.9113933,0.033418134,0.0016077382,0.00072396745,0.000021241784,0.00009795386,0.000048034097,0.04825007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06884758,0.88922256,0.020898761,0.0011296513,0.0046220347,0.00008870346,0.00031928328,0.000075434364,0.014795978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993449,0.00019732415,0.000045977635,0.00012708448,0.00023471715,0.000049990944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771285,0.0017753689,0.00007882951,0.00011236311,0.00025140305,0.00006913801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017782723,0.00091855845,0.0015070179,0.003909279,0.0007233173,0.0030535343,0.0013224039,0.0016428933,0.00602652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026970906,0.00079618994,0.00069207355,0.008785422,0.0021747788,0.0053414744,0.0012152259,0.002099699,0.0016995651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046181634,0.0002835886,0.0008254281,0.0035912707,0.00006638534,0.00013425921,0.00032851737,0.0033641509,0.0006405968,0.6494929,0.024918264,0.31630844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015258996,0.000086816246,0.0017788353,0.000881012,0.000030833544,0.0006800753,0.0002032985,0.005225514,0.00031705393,0.7465724,0.24415828,0.0000507573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000803219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075942336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00602652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014471558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011487434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020160675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413345108","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5389511","title":"Mandates, Latent Conditions, and Error Avoidance in Performance Evaluations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Econometrics; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.0899130050134964,"score_gpt":0.42704822944249277,"score_spread":0.33713522442899635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413345108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98303103,0.00011755267,0.008795196,0.00041629028,0.000015512389,0.00004532539,0.00012633011,0.000030498388,0.0074221888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860424,0.000025099767,0.0009444581,0.000024808292,0.000012377599,0.0000393821,0.000059957594,0.000012899224,0.00027683796],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876588,0.006381619,0.00097465946,0.0017715717,0.0021326337,0.0010808136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8511281,0.10312328,0.023544488,0.014400187,0.0036735253,0.004130465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019421082,0.0005634097,0.0011034828,0.0013343266,0.0010297186,0.003970689,0.0006680198,0.0022125894,0.006034034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08882805,0.00066694414,0.0007960413,0.0008224663,0.0028196564,0.0032424787,0.0025528884,0.0029257804,0.00033032589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014602098,0.007537206,0.6120581,0.00045823696,0.0009229861,0.00051369215,0.004753189,0.017309258,0.017720766,0.2517244,0.0011470612,0.07125308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006226922,0.0015531414,0.7045126,0.000100794394,0.0003454774,0.00030455145,0.0010205312,0.03929633,0.003354267,0.24796185,0.00072462775,0.00020322966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012782502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014908244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019421082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013230438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014210639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10270977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413417374","doi":"10.1080/13504851.2025.2549513","title":"Do generalizations of expected utility explain more than the zero effect?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics Letters","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Zero (linguistics); Economics; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05143792888537318,"score_gpt":0.34328807341875806,"score_spread":0.29185014453338487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413417374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66999626,0.004500218,0.24760915,0.0233473,0.0003789482,0.00006342827,0.0003302992,0.0003400975,0.053434204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922724,0.0009523483,0.004815717,0.0006705958,0.00019828614,0.000020542178,0.00007203467,0.00003306213,0.00096509495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978927,0.001002047,0.00009293117,0.00034714025,0.0004590627,0.00020619175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9129959,0.0673733,0.0072110933,0.009338084,0.0020356348,0.0010459669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010403389,0.00069802743,0.001217876,0.0015467242,0.0005070212,0.0017114761,0.00197137,0.0014599285,0.008674706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08362569,0.00028229528,0.0010615183,0.0013543629,0.0049386765,0.012272298,0.0016763046,0.003063788,0.000827779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003932856,0.00020434838,0.057435505,0.00035811588,0.00035683165,0.00026282904,0.0011240742,0.0077109206,0.00046248935,0.8337534,0.001813159,0.096125074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002931935,0.000058631907,0.009778165,0.000039454586,0.00003846795,0.000081078564,0.00032776248,0.007925222,0.0001907689,0.9801634,0.0013495231,0.000018143477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015292437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015082497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010403389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076296506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059764285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05501908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413422965","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2025.102845","title":"The impact of language on decision-making: Auction winners are less cursed in a foreign language","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"University of Chicago; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Linguistics; Foreign language; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.07771835826783256,"score_gpt":0.495459282025436,"score_spread":0.4177409237576034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413422965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99830484,0.000014531695,0.00007830853,0.000047112968,0.0000026548464,0.000004053921,0.0000048547963,0.000002040727,0.0015416761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992186,0.000009895856,0.00013198389,0.00005494195,0.0000020306945,0.000004960281,0.00000959411,0.0000034635013,0.00056451507],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820614,0.0009733725,0.000100329285,0.00021337852,0.00024402706,0.00026270095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892446,0.0055362154,0.0024121564,0.00084270857,0.0005425502,0.0014217534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037237387,0.00027251706,0.000467951,0.00035624907,0.00064196833,0.00238568,0.00039068633,0.00067184714,0.0039476636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019318044,0.00021023159,0.00027922372,0.00021607465,0.0013683562,0.0007848633,0.0008992168,0.0009916896,0.0004629066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01762927,0.0075423466,0.7741132,0.00035809202,0.000656247,0.0018934922,0.019626569,0.0054663657,0.09417398,0.006110691,0.0016497355,0.07078003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006707116,0.004049135,0.95451355,0.00004315347,0.0003252172,0.0004611587,0.010512734,0.011829776,0.0073477654,0.007717808,0.0023867683,0.00014212173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042913244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005307548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042913244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059804315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006755888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019693255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413438112","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.13076","title":"Motivating low performers with input‐based relative performance feedback","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.1845137332592009,"score_gpt":0.4340190936804423,"score_spread":0.24950536042124138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413438112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99320436,0.000028472226,0.0015203272,0.00036283085,0.000032448028,0.00010469778,0.000023648376,0.00012835782,0.0045949062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922936,0.000032108186,0.003920132,0.00030437906,0.000020691634,0.00013152046,0.000030945565,0.00002024957,0.0032463893],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976265,0.001208921,0.00009836162,0.00021940925,0.00049203966,0.00035491103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98701894,0.0065325648,0.002226377,0.000980562,0.00088425475,0.0023573178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037059442,0.00069771847,0.00040286142,0.00057615194,0.0009002562,0.0016566734,0.00076973,0.0009779525,0.011053865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014442136,0.00021189082,0.00021664237,0.00024276439,0.0007001931,0.00055497536,0.0013159766,0.0010535035,0.0017348991],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007793403,0.05380322,0.23137805,0.0013855724,0.00021190828,0.0009862778,0.018720277,0.0058723325,0.22794926,0.0055220407,0.013106857,0.4332709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023175706,0.059027303,0.681607,0.00084408885,0.00046986446,0.00078584906,0.025137527,0.0517958,0.11190793,0.019090414,0.0463377,0.0006788974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009257967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013230187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011053865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059829745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009789239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03697884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413473869","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucaf049","title":"The Confirmation Nudge: Prompts to Change or Confirm Initial Preferences Steer Consumer Choice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Consumer choice; Advertising; Economics; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Business","score_opus":0.621304329678497,"score_gpt":0.6006559536574757,"score_spread":0.02064837602102132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413473869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903362,0.00017482245,0.0028738617,0.00031239685,0.00008748606,0.00016536521,0.00009505058,0.00033769585,0.005617141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99057746,0.000087919114,0.0075074155,0.00035463198,0.00003963203,0.00021239356,0.0000547952,0.000051139763,0.0011146067],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978479,0.001419182,0.00015070284,0.00026012957,0.00021234903,0.000109771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9258952,0.06367441,0.004276074,0.003961498,0.00086498354,0.0013278344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037216237,0.000493942,0.0004853443,0.00030345848,0.00039529242,0.0010154868,0.0005409716,0.0013161591,0.011485428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03454622,0.00040805267,0.00021209476,0.00019952032,0.0007378102,0.001563263,0.00083907647,0.0011654195,0.00092671416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07708545,0.029224144,0.11560829,0.0043421783,0.00036109894,0.0015323883,0.010217539,0.008211857,0.2926695,0.014742576,0.01760805,0.4283969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0143325655,0.05774515,0.6657846,0.0012724679,0.0011068737,0.0011152397,0.0073660812,0.0498714,0.117850274,0.025972681,0.056513574,0.001069013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006107096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010175083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011485428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043085104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042301242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038422585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413812304","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5413975","title":"Modulating a neural marker of outcome valence as a function of intention: Feedback-related negativity (FRN) reduction when wins are treated as losses","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Negativity effect; Valence (chemistry); Psychology; Reduction (mathematics); Outcome (game theory); Function (biology); Control theory (sociology); Social psychology; Computer science; Physics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Quantum mechanics; Mathematical economics; Control (management)","score_opus":0.07017870171894461,"score_gpt":0.36494849407638,"score_spread":0.2947697923574354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413812304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854983,0.00012606889,0.0070133586,0.0002948693,0.00015389733,0.000043378976,0.00018914734,0.00006838485,0.006612638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946843,0.00011160935,0.0035145227,0.000191357,0.000043716394,0.00004520556,0.00008674366,0.00008348534,0.0012391724],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967015,0.00006659758,0.000015234928,0.00012571011,0.00007867945,0.00004367201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887174,0.0005964407,0.00026458767,0.00008730078,0.000070117516,0.000109775116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006610117,0.00040061527,0.00035439766,0.0001586751,0.00014964335,0.000814414,0.00036845525,0.00061454135,0.0042778226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051438455,0.00027761006,0.00016935311,0.00017505552,0.00044642598,0.0005678518,0.00038867642,0.0006353932,0.00026314196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039789933,0.00062287704,0.008658474,0.00029296297,0.00010108647,0.00010458475,0.00039769293,0.0008580821,0.9489698,0.0030792833,0.0008214872,0.032114778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009768334,0.004254186,0.78084147,0.0001436972,0.0005018248,0.00072194776,0.0005182555,0.027268933,0.14779013,0.03474839,0.0021345203,0.00009982199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048303136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004859422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042778226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021913824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022152683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014310777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414275592","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2024.04870","title":"Measuring Probabilistic Risk Attitudes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Attractiveness; Probabilistic logic; Heuristic; Independence (probability theory); Agency (philosophy); Function (biology); Prospect theory","score_opus":0.15957894677218382,"score_gpt":0.40584462154633544,"score_spread":0.24626567477415162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414275592","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22763753,0.00048051454,0.72692263,0.00086163013,0.00012231602,0.00038213175,0.0009861658,0.00026298166,0.04234411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90554017,0.00029492215,0.09139651,0.00011849187,0.00006744655,0.0003627743,0.00042013463,0.000036104117,0.0017634027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960246,0.0016853843,0.00028775443,0.00042676125,0.001343291,0.00023224168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97355425,0.015724657,0.0053059515,0.0021933385,0.0024780545,0.00074373937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005803517,0.0008487987,0.00040352423,0.0024431194,0.00047231474,0.0029379535,0.0008237868,0.0009968152,0.007905437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043337975,0.00029909093,0.00070409826,0.0017325323,0.001422485,0.0030676064,0.001720657,0.0014198837,0.0008301036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002523197,0.0009377238,0.105469994,0.00048290196,0.00026520563,0.00014207889,0.0022685605,0.042732157,0.0052933297,0.63079613,0.0037027632,0.20765693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000476382,0.0005314464,0.09747323,0.0003191415,0.00014503395,0.00036690827,0.0012661305,0.13108234,0.004031567,0.7481611,0.016352769,0.00022266708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007862849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009921654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007905437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009801105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007920925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03069228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414482117","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103181","title":"Prudence and higher-order risk attitudes in the rank-dependent utility model","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Actua; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Weighting; Prudence; Generality; Stochastic dominance; Consistency (knowledge bases); Differentiable function; Expected utility hypothesis; Probability measure; Function (biology); Monotonic function","score_opus":0.12133564214320712,"score_gpt":0.4065820069671549,"score_spread":0.2852463648239478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414482117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64225376,0.0007619256,0.32685086,0.004963297,0.000082895946,0.00008255489,0.000309972,0.00012617817,0.024568476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822072,0.00030015947,0.009518556,0.00013039581,0.00006083036,0.000037378308,0.000067723726,0.000014658523,0.007663075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743456,0.0015661847,0.00009466837,0.00024017923,0.00027918728,0.0003852814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806341,0.0148987705,0.0016260365,0.00093349774,0.0008967033,0.0010108323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005855595,0.0009023022,0.00178011,0.0012895874,0.00078562286,0.0046854303,0.0015646406,0.002524698,0.005431939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021026693,0.00069626013,0.0009547968,0.00095736556,0.0026661567,0.004786201,0.0014488768,0.0030893984,0.0005770122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001951759,0.00024696227,0.0034688525,0.00007575694,0.000087812325,0.000332057,0.00043707012,0.08662189,0.00044945313,0.89841014,0.00085198006,0.0088229105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051657134,0.00009021467,0.0017493934,0.000022113369,0.000030391071,0.00012601988,0.00008951868,0.38721526,0.00009239766,0.610149,0.00033610096,0.000047856025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036860977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025225482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005855595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015980827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009876654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030967712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414636012","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-96041-3_13","title":"Preferences, Habits, and Free Choice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Synthese Library/Synthese library","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Appeal; Ideal (ethics); Reflexivity; Deliberation; Compatibilism; Power (physics); Free will","score_opus":0.07528863137639227,"score_gpt":0.30673187520705836,"score_spread":0.23144324383066608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414636012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.113335736,0.069316685,0.07545985,0.016977156,0.00076607085,0.0000616496,0.0010180847,0.00017645003,0.7228883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8174923,0.037280742,0.0172541,0.0014139196,0.0007130997,0.0001527135,0.0006643376,0.00006007803,0.12496873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997675,0.00012699001,0.00000952604,0.000026941958,0.000048070564,0.000021037356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988261,0.00095981197,0.000056238794,0.00006109195,0.0000409361,0.000055891258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072980265,0.00033858672,0.0002967205,0.0005388827,0.00022775777,0.0016303725,0.00025195794,0.0006841564,0.019178523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033606999,0.00022289211,0.00021241978,0.0012664691,0.0012763651,0.0017126015,0.00028811736,0.0008764313,0.0014522327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084716325,0.000136487,0.002002114,0.00034686553,0.00005906329,0.000058877984,0.00044233009,0.006482094,0.0003466405,0.79406995,0.022796873,0.173174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008932159,0.0000140100565,0.0018405839,0.000075872835,0.0000077880495,0.00003701056,0.0001465552,0.0021538818,0.00006163373,0.9803463,0.015300251,0.0000070496453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013968658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00172145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019178523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000587047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036667695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0641585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414871809","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2025.102469","title":"Note on intertemporal preference with loss aversion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea; National Research Foundation of Korea","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Monotonic function; Preference; Monotone polygon; Extension (predicate logic); Loss aversion; Intertemporal choice; Time preference","score_opus":0.2307279006708502,"score_gpt":0.45048028913524263,"score_spread":0.21975238846439243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414871809","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050284468,0.008187643,0.52230144,0.068042755,0.010236258,0.00016189563,0.00152786,0.00034289525,0.33891472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7564676,0.010871876,0.10707646,0.014176041,0.015730295,0.00035155207,0.00047074415,0.0003943412,0.094461165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987985,0.00042920496,0.0000794731,0.00022006793,0.0003715924,0.000101182835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99076045,0.0070328126,0.00036474995,0.0007103586,0.000892747,0.00023887673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00222945,0.0011015518,0.00117382,0.0011079436,0.0010522768,0.0017341743,0.0014415708,0.00232499,0.017517203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010756787,0.0004089029,0.0014288041,0.001584897,0.0025629813,0.0049243094,0.001682004,0.0061743148,0.001269948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108242166,0.00005462737,0.0003031705,0.00015681819,0.00004813801,0.00035225725,0.00017250149,0.002188444,0.0011979139,0.9687881,0.011832857,0.014796905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001299344,0.000020329046,0.00026796784,0.000019355055,0.000016096821,0.00011635737,0.000018488952,0.0031689808,0.00028957136,0.9882378,0.007817611,0.000014339709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018395021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011602676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017517203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010054656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005719584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058600903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414897807","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/yagn5_v2","title":"Demand Avoidance in Value-Based Choice Under Risk: A Behavioral and Pupillometric Examination","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Cognition; Context (archaeology); Demand characteristics; Control (management); Self-control; Value (mathematics); Behavioral economics; Empirical research","score_opus":0.09298270197935536,"score_gpt":0.41719464944656065,"score_spread":0.3242119474672053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414897807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994301,0.000014401958,0.00027156054,0.000012446798,0.0000010327051,0.000010084425,0.000007420219,0.0000012924138,0.00025153765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990332,0.00002395542,0.00057845237,0.000020383488,0.0000027984363,0.000030923697,0.000032323398,0.0000017298145,0.00027635266],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993895,0.00019569948,0.000042166143,0.00010282597,0.00021884177,0.000050885217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969181,0.0013214267,0.00089478143,0.0004168941,0.00010692176,0.00034184268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018201199,0.00027816938,0.00024111853,0.00031826008,0.00026479975,0.0006075638,0.0001787305,0.00035376457,0.001404942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005256542,0.0002094547,0.00021670827,0.00013915278,0.00054619135,0.00038561373,0.00059130776,0.000740053,0.000076327124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006185537,0.016909827,0.6860607,0.00020834946,0.00031874506,0.00026047288,0.004230625,0.0018809232,0.23295659,0.0024207197,0.00037353934,0.048193943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009495517,0.0039037988,0.9808214,0.0000107602045,0.000039750408,0.0002733099,0.00052625145,0.0046712286,0.007745106,0.0013785986,0.00050064427,0.000034245302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055232045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007384532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018201199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019242684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016736731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0096257925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414979665","doi":"10.1017/esa.2025.10018","title":"Choosing portfolios of rival risky options: evidence that most people violate the no safety schools theorem","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Economic Science Association","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamic inconsistency","score_opus":0.056872071037368244,"score_gpt":0.38142131235120436,"score_spread":0.3245492413138361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414979665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9772424,0.00049533835,0.0060104895,0.0020861088,0.000050968196,0.00007259146,0.00014954907,0.00003707407,0.01385538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99653447,0.00016223425,0.0012624313,0.00089130143,0.00003822043,0.00005163684,0.000106474174,0.0000121462945,0.0009411043],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98825014,0.0064122323,0.0010808761,0.0014758516,0.0024203837,0.000360508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7637889,0.15391104,0.03813186,0.034823865,0.0054253372,0.0039189216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02038538,0.00059731543,0.0010317803,0.0008742561,0.0008577323,0.0020645927,0.001302111,0.0022224572,0.0139895575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11269042,0.0004877123,0.00041089026,0.00061850436,0.0029991886,0.0026306703,0.0018286643,0.0022273338,0.002437201],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01626142,0.008765041,0.6718289,0.0008538356,0.0012106488,0.00082041067,0.008399875,0.007583102,0.014650278,0.044745084,0.013381761,0.21149959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024983806,0.009532945,0.6042206,0.00045310232,0.0004829785,0.0025941045,0.007879523,0.055692397,0.010496811,0.2856323,0.020190986,0.0003258557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075356534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004293654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02038538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003422003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003112781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107809484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416332095","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2023.01558","title":"Nonadditivity of Subjective Expectations over Different Time Intervals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Stock price; Perception; Stock (firearms); Quarter (Canadian coin); Additive function; Interval (graph theory); Degree (music)","score_opus":0.051311032008727706,"score_gpt":0.39820018670743484,"score_spread":0.3468891546987071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416332095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92064095,0.00026692086,0.06329562,0.0004963291,0.00007677481,0.00009351405,0.00079587183,0.00008598625,0.014247903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959014,0.000042833588,0.002775745,0.000059789727,0.000028521403,0.00003679255,0.00039737186,0.000013156625,0.000744422],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929807,0.0024291617,0.000784113,0.0016982321,0.0015624957,0.0005452294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87814885,0.08309298,0.018621834,0.013032335,0.0045372355,0.0025668726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013204313,0.0005757918,0.00070997345,0.001679857,0.00047808734,0.0029687213,0.00092864234,0.0008214931,0.008068786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081639424,0.00048756727,0.0016299178,0.0010481941,0.0014305967,0.0031523607,0.0022328482,0.0021347883,0.0006308768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024079385,0.0007417747,0.79178655,0.00043703313,0.0017615494,0.000950838,0.0069285263,0.028408702,0.009094843,0.058892574,0.0014406444,0.097149074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000625206,0.00076497666,0.85909134,0.00009933418,0.00040524208,0.00061422156,0.0024104828,0.05687154,0.00403755,0.07301283,0.0024032,0.00022681619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021460452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001680797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013204313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091627834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043521676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06983191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416527734","doi":"10.1017/9781009322737.008","title":"Deviating from Plans","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.0892036669322929,"score_gpt":0.2887299620391261,"score_spread":0.1995262951068332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416527734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018342102,0.0015193524,0.14800006,0.009858134,0.00038041486,0.00012915173,0.0002203235,0.00024551756,0.8213049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6376722,0.002416073,0.087495334,0.002133963,0.00021940496,0.00039609426,0.0007650288,0.00053242926,0.26836953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987772,0.0004835974,0.000051208728,0.00023677998,0.00035167747,0.000099449986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980009,0.0009748151,0.00008790224,0.0006901089,0.000159624,0.00008650991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017556094,0.0005749656,0.00048093242,0.0005177519,0.0012863434,0.0039804094,0.0008931529,0.0013960666,0.021124039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008651324,0.00041279595,0.00062803505,0.0006613059,0.0052850703,0.0051290714,0.0024569985,0.0040349565,0.0035490221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006608592,0.000008459808,0.00013437174,0.000015749572,0.0000061371225,0.000026477865,0.00044858293,0.00085812435,0.000096544645,0.9761212,0.0034875022,0.018790144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048633324,0.000009247133,0.00014359351,0.0000447896,0.00000511005,0.000034396508,0.00023415379,0.002019487,0.0002290195,0.9547128,0.04255706,0.0000055342884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026697181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027625142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021124039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014423514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001759647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07066691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416995107","doi":"10.1037/pha0000809","title":"Delay discounting violations vary by adolescent sociodemographics: Excluding nonsystematic data may bias conclusions.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; University of Toronto","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Discounting; Receipt; Delay discounting; Addiction; Cognition; Valuation (finance); Psychological science; Cognitive bias","score_opus":0.2939852141856397,"score_gpt":0.5620577036864968,"score_spread":0.26807248950085705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416995107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883642,0.00039794506,0.0016462965,0.0004938273,0.000038896713,0.00017305186,0.005215092,0.000023007397,0.0036477048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994619,0.00021997727,0.0014269291,0.00020547633,0.00001996452,0.00023461724,0.0025712433,0.000018393193,0.00068432436],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628097,0.0016501581,0.00067887496,0.0004986098,0.0006550111,0.00023638537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9512156,0.025697837,0.015294496,0.005129881,0.0016852658,0.0009768787],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012243483,0.00030038343,0.00039507903,0.0010046384,0.0005256595,0.0013554489,0.0008417091,0.00043030453,0.007497278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06362988,0.00025597934,0.00063336146,0.0016633159,0.00047802535,0.0014407961,0.0011647069,0.0013403714,0.00072809274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098913384,0.000093479684,0.98836553,0.00003821314,0.00007658048,0.000022226888,0.00036049477,0.00005019512,0.00006436361,0.00028302064,0.00083896,0.0097079165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013392918,0.00009263843,0.99620277,0.000058279802,0.000059065675,0.0000967444,0.00045036,0.0006112027,0.0002369769,0.00064742827,0.0015261316,0.000004967848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057488265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0094265025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046202625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007934667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06475049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W49927985","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-12-800283-4.00003-4","title":"Probability Matching, Fast and Slow","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"˜The œPsychology of learning and motivation/˜The œpsychology of learning and motivation","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.09388659606299772,"score_gpt":0.36238487309312317,"score_spread":0.26849827703012547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W49927985","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058510255,0.016956983,0.7646397,0.007400511,0.001162635,0.00009994717,0.00028575613,0.00065599574,0.15028824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.774044,0.009496142,0.119200416,0.0016063948,0.0019905537,0.00016389509,0.0002786886,0.00048398715,0.09273601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986192,0.00039549783,0.0000670629,0.00035589494,0.00040300036,0.00015939998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939693,0.0041073007,0.00038456547,0.0008678094,0.00042747328,0.00024339558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002606368,0.00043975256,0.0008542939,0.0010421755,0.0007705891,0.0031043387,0.0014866139,0.0018068951,0.014057433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020410817,0.00057674036,0.0006479807,0.0015981818,0.0031055713,0.009553672,0.0015496659,0.0023909598,0.0022365141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060394897,0.000021708101,0.0003661636,0.00007079569,0.000017113209,0.000020957506,0.0000658756,0.00378876,0.00076399365,0.9421859,0.004220796,0.04841754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011701509,0.000018040326,0.00038277608,0.000014967198,0.0000100171,0.00008857153,0.000017926908,0.025243407,0.00048382653,0.9673368,0.006378446,0.000013614436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013300925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005687529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014057433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013525075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097376877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047026753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W564510426","doi":"","title":"Data Dispersion in Economics (I) - Possibility of Restrictions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics and Finance","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Mathematical economics; Dispersion (optics); Equity (law); Equity premium puzzle; Econometrics; Risk aversion (psychology); Expected utility hypothesis; Utility theory; Prospect theory; Scale (ratio); Microeconomics; Neoclassical economics; Risk premium; Physics; Political science; Law; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.2253657623444704,"score_gpt":0.411302887468271,"score_spread":0.1859371251238006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W564510426","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03869665,0.044842068,0.79203993,0.03089707,0.0016484951,0.00023750715,0.0010373223,0.00044764613,0.09015329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7959349,0.026429318,0.15711403,0.00435118,0.0041593383,0.00059109915,0.00065272156,0.0002188682,0.010548466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828287,0.0070082946,0.0015929644,0.0027432968,0.005222955,0.0006038575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9137557,0.06586109,0.004994532,0.010889951,0.0036881831,0.0008105557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015838386,0.00076594856,0.0016861133,0.0036461202,0.0017426951,0.008417693,0.0022668745,0.0049448973,0.0052588563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076426886,0.0010498295,0.0014318901,0.0043995194,0.010641606,0.01730723,0.006071899,0.0063382336,0.0009780043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004224685,0.000020074804,0.001439545,0.000230169,0.000032497635,0.000239995,0.00022050794,0.0030491462,0.00025461035,0.96387666,0.0024700735,0.028124383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008354207,0.000020868145,0.00054674695,0.00024274943,0.0000122578795,0.00052589324,0.00010012956,0.0054370235,0.0003409677,0.98101175,0.011727731,0.000025510364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083094055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033637235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015838386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002788413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013000546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08376241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W621487820","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001","title":"What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":483,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cued speech; Decoupling (probability); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.5084308370774361,"score_gpt":0.5253165416008257,"score_spread":0.016885704523389666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W621487820","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15296686,0.00042757005,0.7911436,0.0052163834,0.00011043125,0.00030922305,0.00018542231,0.00020513772,0.049435403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91438764,0.00024078405,0.07734915,0.00018850468,0.000044706198,0.0002703833,0.00007532522,0.00004041157,0.0074031004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971112,0.0014323393,0.00009887571,0.00042385096,0.00056100363,0.0003726598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925574,0.0050734933,0.00048420753,0.00054335623,0.00071646733,0.0006250605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043286094,0.00071172905,0.00085726613,0.0012862233,0.0011788129,0.0062212483,0.0028324558,0.002962026,0.010048194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017004166,0.00090289215,0.0015626671,0.001071568,0.003511375,0.007815541,0.0026147955,0.0025190555,0.0014332271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002762726,0.00026143095,0.0033240388,0.00012298797,0.00008120315,0.00026652266,0.0037077821,0.029353302,0.0028346768,0.9382561,0.0009018688,0.020613855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007387594,0.00007740619,0.0010862976,0.00003259362,0.000050433962,0.000117352196,0.0004967098,0.34253797,0.0005621115,0.6538216,0.0010971478,0.0000464751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041289357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018977174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010048194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018927329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024844774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033614516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W644796199","doi":"10.1177/02601079x01001200202","title":"Choosing from a Moral Point of View","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Sketch; Epistemology; Rationality; Sociology; Politics; Perspective (graphical); Point (geometry); Democracy; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13430021566020212,"score_gpt":0.40903632348821606,"score_spread":0.27473610782801394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W644796199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0664218,0.0017472199,0.13565339,0.15602173,0.0014401429,0.00016448712,0.00012512888,0.0001463756,0.63827974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9233362,0.0006782664,0.025363583,0.018599318,0.0006081095,0.00018603847,0.00007420261,0.00017719828,0.030977078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9764806,0.013704904,0.0005478429,0.0027678872,0.004371493,0.0021272898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910104,0.002986096,0.00077971665,0.0012989461,0.0023044304,0.0016203739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016161922,0.0007266811,0.00081292883,0.0013019653,0.0074109933,0.010992711,0.0017134455,0.0061762026,0.006620462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01488547,0.0004242751,0.0010509198,0.0007483082,0.03239051,0.011604618,0.006331852,0.011105521,0.0019938822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009334183,0.000015121716,0.00030154872,0.000016903876,0.000009939314,0.00006366353,0.0019001653,0.00016085512,0.00018654681,0.99258703,0.00214267,0.0026062133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011240554,0.000025995769,0.0003407385,0.00008284413,0.000010329088,0.00009634239,0.003057234,0.00057844725,0.00023261615,0.9556715,0.03986905,0.000023676732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021164594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022217087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016161922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055904663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048986394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08547342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W67782583","doi":"10.17705/1jais.00350","title":"Confirmation Biases in the Financial Analysis of IT Investments","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Systems","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Confirmation bias; Dual (grammatical number); Confirmatory factor analysis; Finance; Investment (military); Actuarial science; Economics; Psychology; Business; Marketing; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.11960179813248308,"score_gpt":0.3830250843241907,"score_spread":0.26342328619170763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W67782583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870352,0.0003202156,0.00628564,0.000338908,0.000028697688,0.000053888383,0.000049603223,0.000019429812,0.0058683977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777406,0.000087519686,0.001695761,0.000078544595,0.000034981163,0.00002652439,0.00003204048,0.0000054452216,0.00026514617],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97905606,0.013206262,0.0013567273,0.0013247819,0.00444008,0.0006160115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59458816,0.32530853,0.053025972,0.014272016,0.010546545,0.0022588181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03290057,0.0005230316,0.00038466262,0.0017733561,0.0007735622,0.0022158162,0.00049718056,0.0009266099,0.0031150042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25129002,0.00035613257,0.0005083304,0.00083221385,0.001589623,0.0022331094,0.0017963935,0.0011412998,0.00027196915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0098939985,0.0012467998,0.7025354,0.0009821554,0.0011868383,0.0007240406,0.029646203,0.010540783,0.032882795,0.02648256,0.0015322415,0.1823461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038472196,0.0019969288,0.8809504,0.0004477855,0.000580753,0.0007822872,0.008823102,0.019263163,0.020271631,0.06129086,0.004827734,0.000380538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012735849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014541327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03290057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065868266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084968924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17399693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6924731324","doi":"10.15468/dl.yp8rms","title":"Occurrence Download","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Global Biodiversity Information Facility","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Matching (statistics); Range (aeronautics); Set (abstract data type); Data set","score_opus":0.09468375118358023,"score_gpt":0.3351634873542873,"score_spread":0.24047973617070706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6924731324","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000048205984,0.000026427275,0.000050554863,0.000041486623,0.00001072902,0.0000058029104,0.99884194,0.00037799895,0.0005967907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00019055745,0.000034212706,0.00024506426,0.000046921898,0.0000031427348,0.000050093306,0.9988636,0.00012816294,0.00043835965],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999113,0.00012971237,0.00011387354,0.0003074609,0.00019762992,0.00013828644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979273,0.0006352495,0.00019674587,0.00052793766,0.00048234747,0.000230298],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009561814,0.0019271878,0.0014539971,0.0040234528,0.0008632997,0.0023259947,0.0029244854,0.0021720952,0.12819809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059192027,0.0008067233,0.0012063392,0.008191896,0.00042057902,0.0018948177,0.0021376344,0.0020392868,0.18027015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030159546,0.000013962966,0.00040128428,0.0005087099,0.00001648769,0.000014861827,0.000020793768,0.00018102613,0.00009623161,0.00047785343,0.996854,0.0013846222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097971315,0.000008623008,0.0019182988,0.00019361745,0.000015774627,0.000034612804,0.00007137537,0.00028180575,0.00019128912,0.0011314255,0.99603695,0.000018336794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021750322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037008163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8718019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017077032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002254185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4288653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6929554722","doi":"10.5061/dryad.zgmsbcc7n","title":"Data from: An Early Devonian actinostelic euphyllophyte with secondary growth from the Emsian of Gaspé (Canada) and the importance of tracheid wall thickening patterns in early euphyllophyte systematics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tracheid; Devonian; Thickening; Secondary growth; Tetrapod (structure)","score_opus":0.09828615955832866,"score_gpt":0.304638773355391,"score_spread":0.20635261379706238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6929554722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8434572,0.0005470271,0.0012827505,0.0001358479,0.000033016397,0.00016528598,0.119466506,0.00022338294,0.034689005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.886072,0.00037524724,0.0029252644,0.00015658849,0.000014915603,0.00010551534,0.0939007,0.00007443022,0.016375447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999676,0.000006898881,0.00001931141,0.00006278793,0.00015762319,0.00007736737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990376,0.00005118736,0.000108234744,0.000067682304,0.00056796445,0.00016728607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015567953,0.0003590062,0.00025559086,0.0021874509,0.0016243283,0.00082707056,0.00047073982,0.00030249343,0.007576832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004409586,0.000110315195,0.0002258085,0.0029100538,0.00041724378,0.00019533245,0.00054885604,0.0002916669,0.0020955778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006811622,0.00014570418,0.80065626,0.00060095097,0.00013968698,0.00202063,0.0031102076,0.00079910766,0.078739,0.00058243447,0.01376924,0.09875556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012982581,0.000029155564,0.94548315,0.00002278201,0.000029870856,0.00027929439,0.0007851084,0.00011985262,0.0033560842,0.000028142813,0.049839385,0.000014272425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8212692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9283224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17873079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034369603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004485452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3595667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930566533","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.14897636","title":"\"I Want to Know What Love Is\": Problematising Vector Semantics for the Analysis of Discourse in the Late Middle Ages","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Middle Ages; Period (music); Semantics (computer science); Perspective (graphical); Dimension (graph theory); Discourse analysis","score_opus":0.15398071234294186,"score_gpt":0.3846839521584887,"score_spread":0.23070323981554686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930566533","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14444675,0.0042579058,0.82041395,0.0066200504,0.00022856484,0.00032446077,0.0013335916,0.0004006517,0.02197404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73215634,0.0011841671,0.2617189,0.00024783693,0.00014758935,0.00044224667,0.0015389741,0.00012305824,0.0024409734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939813,0.00408066,0.00044150677,0.00066217774,0.0005952364,0.00023911294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915308,0.0064032893,0.0006494758,0.00051329663,0.0006590518,0.0002440725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062269997,0.0007741101,0.0005703801,0.004893412,0.0022403435,0.007802895,0.0011551061,0.0011853075,0.0031316113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01421659,0.00039858127,0.0015208913,0.004480272,0.0068410556,0.011967186,0.0036858316,0.0024487309,0.0004234835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008527383,0.000035904344,0.0020750593,0.0002269521,0.00003546903,0.0001199737,0.022930566,0.0023729424,0.0007120613,0.9247072,0.0017746536,0.044923898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019940211,0.000028465358,0.0016172735,0.00023887432,0.000022148322,0.0001163844,0.020938657,0.030813731,0.0006392367,0.91061884,0.03490792,0.000038528688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006544949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005396837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007802895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003896079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00235891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032931924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6949826937","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.16794826","title":"ResearchBox 490, 'When Metrics Matter: Impact of Elicitation Metric', https://researchbox.org/490","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Backup; Expert elicitation; Metric (unit); Measure (data warehouse); Preference elicitation; Selection (genetic algorithm)","score_opus":0.1557771206082407,"score_gpt":0.40697131721126306,"score_spread":0.25119419660302233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6949826937","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034530023,0.0016590019,0.023324545,0.016362766,0.0043336903,0.0020559598,0.49506956,0.11621951,0.33752197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.054798774,0.0030562151,0.08666929,0.010774989,0.0026098536,0.009597329,0.31612846,0.17940848,0.33695665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949157,0.001526617,0.0005950628,0.0005811502,0.0021022998,0.00027923513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.921898,0.045942586,0.003713403,0.010548022,0.014920672,0.002977355],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010342468,0.0011852827,0.0016009681,0.0030933232,0.0016214333,0.005952274,0.0019660213,0.002674411,0.7385787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1134587,0.0009782517,0.0008167747,0.003973791,0.00078279583,0.0071810964,0.0037257436,0.0017522031,0.5675197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018816424,0.000044575696,0.00027807173,0.0007052496,0.0000069764233,0.000017385419,0.00010546625,0.000048573525,0.00020793488,0.0013999185,0.9694018,0.027595865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049062644,0.000072411785,0.0029514679,0.0012588588,0.000030154593,0.00006359489,0.00026421537,0.0005097756,0.0021711795,0.011042928,0.9810837,0.00006108801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033559725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057670125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9896575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00222705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038413028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37288576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6955178274","doi":"10.58079/myss","title":"Canadá y el mundo desde 1867","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Industrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Field (mathematics); Identity (music); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.06939182876057931,"score_gpt":0.3230653144046877,"score_spread":0.2536734856441084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6955178274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09185998,0.054562163,0.0013779374,0.04707554,0.0018520596,0.00011065255,0.005334275,0.00011119131,0.7977162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43997768,0.03687801,0.0016815073,0.0065526813,0.00021866457,0.000045774716,0.0015592024,0.00005734202,0.5130292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986488,0.00007685671,0.000018713781,0.00011887282,0.0007002846,0.000436548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921656,0.000058744146,0.000053170614,0.000021694768,0.000465913,0.00018402429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044343676,0.00037000174,0.00025388756,0.0012179948,0.007857658,0.005785634,0.00063326396,0.0013051851,0.016446255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016594684,0.00019727717,0.00023795496,0.003103173,0.0039516254,0.0013484373,0.0013725503,0.0013641339,0.0013395757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002407569,0.00006172328,0.019235628,0.00053166924,0.00006670448,0.0012587102,0.016633008,0.0009951516,0.0007237366,0.4907073,0.23788719,0.2316584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004708382,0.0000081074795,0.009286213,0.00020300718,0.0000067728706,0.000068188376,0.0032281824,0.00007872685,0.00015595547,0.00299153,0.98395073,0.000017894787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9810651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99367476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059349053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059349053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10344775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43060952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958536954","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.29093727.v1","title":"Additional file 4 of Hybrid sequencing reveals the genome of a Chrysochromulina parva virus and highlight its distinct replication strategy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Genome; DNA sequencing; Replication (statistics); Whole genome sequencing; Gene; Sequence assembly","score_opus":0.1338857762694849,"score_gpt":0.3532302597434573,"score_spread":0.2193444834739724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958536954","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023368205,0.000016487505,0.0010000342,0.000112139845,0.00005551997,0.00002896646,0.99552625,0.0012040025,0.0018229238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009149431,0.00013514179,0.011045035,0.0006956406,0.00009791118,0.0006399448,0.96143687,0.0064134975,0.010386577],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994204,0.00009584438,0.000047343263,0.00017062333,0.00013152926,0.00013434864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891561,0.008994282,0.00031621126,0.00055370457,0.000615264,0.00036430178],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00112064,0.0014388758,0.0012891159,0.0026137675,0.0011034234,0.0021096407,0.002286727,0.002088484,0.89602697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011901314,0.0010019332,0.0014043909,0.0027886622,0.00044787177,0.0019017109,0.0010830939,0.0014440179,0.34153676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002163481,0.00012774499,0.0016558041,0.0017563598,0.00006301999,0.00010308527,0.000082921375,0.0016129249,0.00084434653,0.002920705,0.9827879,0.007828913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024906236,0.00020048291,0.015412045,0.0013263276,0.00017110934,0.00043344844,0.00032837066,0.007782665,0.0035468664,0.039002474,0.9290386,0.0002669423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008016198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015024469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89602697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012559431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017098768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14830482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6962642118","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/4pjm7","title":"Ingroup biases and cognitive load (Experiment 2)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open Science Framework","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Task (project management); Ingroups and outgroups; Cognition; Order (exchange); Cognitive load; Term (time); Social preferences","score_opus":0.22007016658005057,"score_gpt":0.4821796696564969,"score_spread":0.2621095030764463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6962642118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846466,0.00018979286,0.0017121533,0.00047585316,0.0003420816,0.0011738082,0.0009078405,0.00015875218,0.010393083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96799546,0.00013167459,0.006756143,0.0015676874,0.0004293661,0.0063117878,0.0017300221,0.00024651768,0.014831296],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972819,0.0007156166,0.0002303704,0.0008501352,0.0005646759,0.00035721797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731406,0.014128221,0.0036586367,0.0053836666,0.0012488776,0.0024399727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006973414,0.0014394835,0.0015800588,0.000667414,0.001698293,0.003932481,0.0020918567,0.0028363008,0.03392799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024726644,0.0008388626,0.0008590324,0.00044550098,0.0015819285,0.0045066085,0.0033208318,0.0038407338,0.0060042674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.2231763,0.16282457,0.12613545,0.005623932,0.002081086,0.0014945598,0.06441217,0.0035841907,0.15891966,0.021011243,0.04306451,0.18767235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.035698924,0.1111893,0.6774855,0.000725633,0.0014961616,0.0015175887,0.010691138,0.008798295,0.027641755,0.07363959,0.04990281,0.0012133417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010739968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091140845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03392799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081304775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010111554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11350042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6964038355","doi":"10.25384/sage.22002279","title":"Supplemental Material - Cognitive and Behavioral Impacts of Two Decision-Support Modes for Judgmental Bootstrapping","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sage Journals Data","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Bootstrapping (finance); Cognition; Cognitive reframing; Cognitive bias; Cognitive ergonomics; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.30830048852391634,"score_gpt":0.5025163609703954,"score_spread":0.1942158724464791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6964038355","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044319965,0.0007601245,0.330718,0.008919866,0.0023111582,0.006149172,0.46374688,0.031949334,0.111125514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20939443,0.00095279433,0.418061,0.004442918,0.0011680617,0.011019276,0.24970528,0.0103409365,0.09491525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807894,0.00081377965,0.00016131072,0.00017894643,0.00070215005,0.00006488728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8873562,0.09408804,0.0015110596,0.0056908866,0.010237697,0.0011160438],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004104673,0.00079736946,0.00066044624,0.001267029,0.0007694055,0.0012316685,0.0012488075,0.001242508,0.5021599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.083568245,0.00048428326,0.0005325832,0.0013355999,0.00029293206,0.0013940285,0.0010819781,0.0014159348,0.0783869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065139384,0.0013670764,0.0032741833,0.0007020623,0.000053581218,0.00010613201,0.00025214296,0.0017025666,0.0015884391,0.008453612,0.875401,0.106447875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002689328,0.0015872697,0.047513362,0.0018008419,0.00030926062,0.0018492105,0.0010586976,0.07139735,0.016296696,0.17141365,0.6836396,0.00044473854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025203498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004628729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5021599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009971719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011633254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7101085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6969330350","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7916227","title":"Nouveaux modèles, mêmes problèmes : Comment les modèles commerciaux de libre accès des cinq grands éditeurs perpétuent les inégalités dans la communication savante","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Limiting; Research methodology; Information center","score_opus":0.1745406210549176,"score_gpt":0.3572944150570281,"score_spread":0.18275379400211048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6969330350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32834262,0.011831577,0.27653,0.10481199,0.0017251302,0.00060752296,0.005178462,0.0010948745,0.26987794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8805224,0.004478133,0.03810925,0.0023684315,0.0003591559,0.0006948953,0.0013583505,0.00034415597,0.071765214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98650926,0.0065693334,0.0007268251,0.0023492351,0.0031984332,0.0006469675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9171581,0.05634691,0.007488449,0.0063865394,0.010398462,0.0022214642],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022007111,0.00090425153,0.0013354626,0.0023537893,0.0020774396,0.016477562,0.002716747,0.0032755595,0.024644349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09538552,0.0009021638,0.0017348299,0.0042425497,0.004735659,0.012734836,0.002989635,0.0034352916,0.0044223526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084498373,0.00040664602,0.035757095,0.0010507316,0.0005135788,0.00042581774,0.008124398,0.06390505,0.0011623182,0.74892634,0.025249245,0.11363368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003672341,0.0005360977,0.031974476,0.0012505318,0.0008544342,0.00044437958,0.007927995,0.16644989,0.0025051374,0.6084777,0.17886715,0.00034499733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06687616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04069056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9972833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009895008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012598941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13297385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6977820985","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.26735628.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of Assessing the relationship between delay discounting and decisions to engage in various protective behaviors during COVID-19","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Delay discounting","score_opus":0.28433852563632733,"score_gpt":0.45068734059734333,"score_spread":0.166348814961016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6977820985","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010775141,0.000037447277,0.0011672832,0.00020710082,0.00005896769,0.0002677335,0.991514,0.00051934423,0.0051505133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06612849,0.0005545447,0.02432596,0.0015058491,0.00028958314,0.011965459,0.83092326,0.0039391853,0.060367685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916875,0.00029615965,0.00010602107,0.0001513595,0.00018374086,0.000093926414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9244089,0.068235636,0.0016465033,0.0021369953,0.002930432,0.0006415653],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021819232,0.0011678343,0.0011473589,0.0018568541,0.0009944428,0.0016455677,0.0016968698,0.001456923,0.9139612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064484365,0.00069504103,0.0011400492,0.002239489,0.00024920734,0.001788764,0.0010250503,0.0012049932,0.22563109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042399328,0.00030367592,0.0038493613,0.0017138205,0.00005558527,0.00004511394,0.00011032249,0.00066125987,0.000059206,0.0014899677,0.973682,0.017605703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008492934,0.0013504957,0.08279052,0.0064458596,0.0005780875,0.0009557417,0.0016101762,0.011673976,0.0013093286,0.046395134,0.837966,0.00043176295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008103142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012962288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9139612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001065299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016080001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12272388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980014832","doi":"","title":"Are there behavioral hallmarks of configural and elemental evaluation in multi-attribute decision-making?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Noise (video); Perception; Evaluation methods; Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.1445970853040476,"score_gpt":0.4164015540022347,"score_spread":0.2718044686981871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980014832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9420586,0.00040420884,0.031426664,0.0019614468,0.00009007806,0.00011545423,0.000167145,0.00016015893,0.023616232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871143,0.00011923175,0.011718867,0.00025282413,0.000034886318,0.00010489892,0.000090528105,0.00004289012,0.0005215614],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812204,0.000786623,0.00012334931,0.00032631165,0.00053366896,0.00010798365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9315561,0.045388333,0.00858012,0.008837804,0.0030326662,0.0026050014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005361485,0.00029859092,0.0006909318,0.000853416,0.0004135855,0.0032724908,0.0007739408,0.00095528894,0.0060805613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0734553,0.0005300372,0.00066232966,0.0010378803,0.0027263355,0.007342034,0.0011908874,0.0018920827,0.0004149703],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00320979,0.002679405,0.26811603,0.000859292,0.0007945848,0.00028549592,0.0069874437,0.010974236,0.01893128,0.22786783,0.003886938,0.4554077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023889485,0.000866446,0.52659374,0.00022128702,0.00017151755,0.0003894001,0.0019717624,0.046650246,0.0038030972,0.4172912,0.0016448442,0.00015750775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086534995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009122355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060805613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048270682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067351875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028354585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982102273","doi":"","title":"At Guelph Volume 30 Number 28, September 4, 1986","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Atrium (University of Guelph)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Environmental Biology; Ministry of Colleges and Universities; Murdoch University; McMaster University; Iowa State University","keywords":"","score_opus":0.06611961782234957,"score_gpt":0.3169930769166739,"score_spread":0.25087345909432435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982102273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021301054,0.0037660461,0.00039826508,0.006042039,0.0035323724,0.00007726242,0.002193869,0.0006228844,0.98123723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014352927,0.0009875235,0.00009941782,0.00032265208,0.00015373042,0.000009593913,0.00022723936,0.0000762316,0.9966884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995122,0.00007579133,0.000020375219,0.00009842178,0.00017202951,0.00012111339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866414,0.0003635277,0.000043287393,0.0001283204,0.00038363435,0.00041706505],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062511966,0.0012475698,0.00075756,0.0016902856,0.0021229843,0.0033088839,0.0010654761,0.0023062495,0.6151403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029465116,0.00050290517,0.00046298295,0.0018183257,0.0012518914,0.0014264121,0.0016749327,0.0020697196,0.42329952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080596954,0.000045210923,0.00031968093,0.00013620044,0.0000048132306,0.00014815568,0.00011442374,0.000087556946,0.00017048631,0.0040060924,0.9510638,0.043822985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016196132,0.000019608426,0.0015500926,0.00024039565,0.0000066805355,0.00006265034,0.00012324606,0.000071747156,0.0001866899,0.0007331303,0.9969823,0.0000074020522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027269362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14026056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38485968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028996747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025048319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5489556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982104773","doi":"","title":"Guy Pierre. 2015. La crise de 1929 et le développement du capitalisme en Haïti. Une perspective de longue durée et une conjoncture perdue. Montreal: CIDIHCA. 548 pp. ISBN: 9782894543283.","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Diafiltration; Liquation; Emperipolesis; Demotion; Triacetin","score_opus":0.03191612626980148,"score_gpt":0.32809126627114893,"score_spread":0.2961751400013474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982104773","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046913386,0.7851107,0.0046688104,0.059525356,0.0026386792,0.00002315894,0.0037381572,0.00032439767,0.13927938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1320216,0.5448252,0.008129282,0.0037674385,0.0022108967,0.00009471321,0.0019833855,0.000321932,0.3066455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996891,0.00007670716,0.0000142064855,0.000053793046,0.00011410525,0.000052190695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991887,0.00047221666,0.000069075264,0.000028473882,0.00017316073,0.00006828667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000628153,0.00081643614,0.00042796586,0.002186294,0.0013751843,0.0022038743,0.0005703173,0.0023461918,0.037469056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017086895,0.00042615485,0.00029374144,0.0030546593,0.0014115981,0.0036955664,0.0007658259,0.0019002924,0.007466864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011130411,0.000015323832,0.0014438445,0.0007546602,0.000025094982,0.00030652623,0.0032457423,0.00046487545,0.00028240768,0.09260012,0.64990646,0.25084364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011202033,0.000014460194,0.006324805,0.0008273737,0.000013452557,0.00019469706,0.0010981554,0.00017814837,0.00037441222,0.019172829,0.97176254,0.000027912227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08550717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13436809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08550717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032291245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021102622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17001891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989461760","doi":"","title":"Behavioural and theoretical support for ranking theory as an alternative model of human uncertainty representation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Probability distribution; Representation (politics); Probability theory; Task (project management); Imprecise probability; Decision theory; Logarithm","score_opus":0.10456295861023522,"score_gpt":0.3771395452114549,"score_spread":0.27257658660121964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989461760","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29849324,0.0010163522,0.5538778,0.011934016,0.00018434085,0.00012923378,0.0002652021,0.00028271895,0.13381718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518599,0.00030842668,0.04567573,0.00040977803,0.00005746849,0.00008251151,0.000099511555,0.000034772664,0.0014719779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99550915,0.0027681037,0.00013164249,0.00047753222,0.00093822915,0.00017535959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800102,0.013370242,0.0021379958,0.0023042287,0.0016127421,0.00056448224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00710743,0.00048703497,0.00042248433,0.0012775552,0.00079767994,0.0032416037,0.0010254034,0.0011158414,0.008919844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029814016,0.0002517759,0.0005990612,0.0009739144,0.0044906205,0.0044174492,0.0013710003,0.0017695045,0.00082160934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024390602,0.0002369173,0.01668256,0.0003368096,0.00009160058,0.00012283679,0.0057596993,0.012410763,0.0030485522,0.85756534,0.0027685936,0.10073241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039658877,0.0003049858,0.01351558,0.00013852082,0.000042560547,0.0002736131,0.001855358,0.057203226,0.0010955044,0.9145772,0.010868056,0.0000857481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016625474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001710059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008919844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013412839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011118128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03758818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006336425","doi":"","title":"Three Essays on Online Economic Experiments and Experimental Data Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Public health; Value (mathematics); Task (project management); Health insurance; Everyday life","score_opus":0.20616628050709457,"score_gpt":0.4313908345931424,"score_spread":0.22522455408604786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006336425","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026252128,0.01540779,0.47746363,0.20260657,0.026786534,0.011825392,0.00570427,0.0022434038,0.23171023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17892998,0.026448023,0.40872,0.12823054,0.019997777,0.07613124,0.0055929385,0.0033143167,0.15263523],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9639145,0.02387469,0.0023561912,0.0022400715,0.007028521,0.0005859833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6236677,0.33337894,0.007116085,0.016855925,0.017137147,0.0018441232],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04404656,0.0015225484,0.0020013466,0.0015973116,0.0029575147,0.0055195168,0.0024477874,0.0044780057,0.046547253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22815388,0.0012434414,0.0018439017,0.0025272896,0.0057406584,0.006345966,0.0046079536,0.007737617,0.009986337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007169306,0.003301473,0.0024081238,0.0030296321,0.000230189,0.0002162009,0.007713082,0.004101689,0.0022230276,0.37305993,0.39102703,0.21197277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006884263,0.00068178686,0.0037281371,0.0031598192,0.00010733487,0.00015483928,0.0022839056,0.005390246,0.0016806716,0.30031598,0.6816039,0.00020502642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013060494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012776265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9559534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005044624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003077015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2329433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009478780","doi":"","title":"Do children predict the sunk cost bias if prompted to consider effort and emotion?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sunk costs; Character (mathematics); Control (management); Sadness; Dynamic inconsistency","score_opus":0.07298248528803979,"score_gpt":0.3258285006611064,"score_spread":0.2528460153730666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009478780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99840325,0.00007335677,0.00012155461,0.0000768477,0.0000042277966,0.0000040712607,0.00012585803,0.0000073318133,0.0011834227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855524,0.00019028092,0.0004543295,0.000056921894,0.000004045922,0.000014935655,0.00026211006,0.00000526632,0.00045683995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999742,0.000046752324,0.000018266861,0.0000644607,0.00006821861,0.00006042664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665207,0.0011209287,0.0015931836,0.0002074556,0.00017901468,0.00024745075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010505795,0.00024908074,0.00021561694,0.00037163158,0.00013712863,0.0012778096,0.0001985782,0.00056041504,0.003009867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007864765,0.00031914577,0.00027649247,0.00022397173,0.00044194836,0.0008366231,0.0003254262,0.00052784354,0.00068784424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012252099,0.0001002685,0.98833257,0.000023478915,0.000017220958,0.00015372092,0.0015060751,0.00027643258,0.0018658728,0.00019892261,0.00035705598,0.0070458446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013323071,0.00018185009,0.99460804,0.00003596989,0.000031223506,0.00027565807,0.0015029558,0.00081591716,0.0011017676,0.00056097034,0.00085170614,0.000020697138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038898787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006826014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038898787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030552305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020749892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010068953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009700429","doi":"","title":"Exelon and Pepco Holdings Inc. Reach Settlement Agreement with Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties in Maryland - Commodities (COMMODIT) News","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Trade agreement; Human settlement; Agreement","score_opus":0.08196073329870758,"score_gpt":0.3361934895226765,"score_spread":0.25423275622396896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009700429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001007787,0.0011096399,0.00043541112,0.014682007,0.0026138423,0.00004927255,0.0032628628,0.0003534541,0.9764856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035965228,0.00063667016,0.00020247205,0.0013143589,0.00026050117,0.00002257241,0.0009360038,0.00007658523,0.9929543],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999569,0.000041899224,0.000011135071,0.000051615873,0.00023710514,0.000089253066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868363,0.0003753603,0.00005600023,0.00009528359,0.0004944513,0.00029528615],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007151925,0.00038034146,0.00023054013,0.0006354017,0.0013460809,0.0044065057,0.00053376175,0.0017302403,0.36470333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033893967,0.0002333449,0.00028369937,0.0006161274,0.000487377,0.0013179492,0.000944135,0.0022627185,0.1162136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017630306,0.000015930553,0.00014295052,0.000021472177,0.0000010294582,0.00003585168,0.000016795846,0.000026190257,0.0000492649,0.0060441904,0.9829899,0.010638774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041445287,0.0000066600787,0.00067676674,0.000035867615,9.173093e-7,0.000015274585,0.000058200843,0.000066778775,0.00010196521,0.0009250666,0.99810505,0.0000032188934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010391795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0404032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6352967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013507195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024305047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9061736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020706266","doi":"","title":"Meta-reasoning: Deciding which game to play, which problem to solve, and when to quit","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Princeton University; York University; Yale University","keywords":"Cognition; Flexibility (engineering); Bounded function; Feature (linguistics); Range (aeronautics); Decision problem","score_opus":0.08280820396397659,"score_gpt":0.3258223067878651,"score_spread":0.24301410282388852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020706266","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22305037,0.0056401766,0.5873667,0.04383121,0.000525705,0.00074861315,0.0010291557,0.0004992525,0.13730885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7323804,0.0014702145,0.2585786,0.0016716146,0.00014023151,0.00031460932,0.000650017,0.00006961156,0.004724755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99328095,0.004179022,0.00037055815,0.000896963,0.00082790176,0.00044463013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884891,0.007665089,0.0014846472,0.00094293576,0.0005793223,0.00083895243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008249511,0.0010592464,0.00078475196,0.0013661354,0.0014367898,0.0062781284,0.0024316807,0.003349941,0.008091438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023341466,0.00065905845,0.001750471,0.0010431285,0.0067749666,0.008540659,0.0027118202,0.0035293435,0.0011932845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056867354,0.0006530431,0.017777104,0.0008727339,0.00029778818,0.0004705685,0.0051918146,0.021808805,0.0034992653,0.7796314,0.011397473,0.15783142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008476026,0.000101908736,0.0029217368,0.0003177581,0.00007866317,0.00017806044,0.0018832606,0.037607692,0.0012257883,0.94303864,0.012502413,0.000059231024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002792626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003556858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008249511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002856113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005359431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043628097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7045686250","doi":"","title":"Balance of Choices Involving Chance: Psychometric Evaluation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.2341097266003796,"score_gpt":0.36761206641946514,"score_spread":0.13350233981908555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7045686250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94989216,0.0008459661,0.028348465,0.00026944382,0.00024976797,0.002526164,0.0010581905,0.00022678023,0.016582904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98556477,0.0002336673,0.00874403,0.00013262095,0.00008843378,0.0024300988,0.00093644124,0.0001065499,0.0017633435],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9609901,0.021841044,0.005618868,0.0024875766,0.008388192,0.00067418243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.53930116,0.40011862,0.014677692,0.023979774,0.017789174,0.0041336697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05049995,0.00088973617,0.0011914326,0.004425478,0.001330358,0.0019669337,0.0016569818,0.0022278428,0.008160674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27489546,0.0006644489,0.0033525848,0.00243309,0.0028031266,0.0037498872,0.0034146411,0.0017061051,0.0015260057],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.031808935,0.00685788,0.74821055,0.00056571275,0.0015399415,0.00033589546,0.007932971,0.008643103,0.0020147222,0.008877951,0.004227365,0.178985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003508363,0.02166505,0.8719837,0.0006449043,0.0012364957,0.0012051144,0.007951595,0.044306055,0.00433673,0.027015097,0.01565116,0.0004958654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018016566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016298356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05049995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010607055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011594008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26707244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066072462","doi":"","title":"Generating Distributed Randomness using Artificial Neural Networks","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Randomness; Artificial neural network; Representation (politics); Binary number; Cognition","score_opus":0.08655545151657267,"score_gpt":0.32658671676413425,"score_spread":0.24003126524756158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7066072462","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14562526,0.00014137407,0.8490227,0.00046475415,0.000041407817,0.00010601725,0.00011267475,0.00035235702,0.004133485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87895477,0.00013501056,0.11847626,0.00011990202,0.000028282944,0.00022982834,0.0001549227,0.000046986832,0.0018540645],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896216,0.00058689027,0.000049953265,0.00016520185,0.00016477985,0.00007106219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922806,0.0062759467,0.0005201583,0.00046226787,0.00036412285,0.000096946715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021590434,0.00049199123,0.0006276216,0.0007339728,0.0003601251,0.00096432015,0.00086061197,0.0007730633,0.0013341397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011178701,0.00038135552,0.00069154747,0.0006113959,0.0010488554,0.0012859905,0.0009243235,0.0009827398,0.00015492135],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056406527,0.000025983883,0.0010237532,0.00002692418,0.000027534845,0.00004753522,0.000059883972,0.9613311,0.00069078733,0.026180776,0.00019676586,0.010332502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065256077,0.0000065143217,0.00008285428,0.000003888251,0.0000024294213,0.0000061906007,0.000004575192,0.9827057,0.00019741018,0.016885696,0.000094076306,0.0000040864024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002981498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030028836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002981498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011646232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005483865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011418283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7085148421","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17286644","title":"Prevalence of depression among elderly patients in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Depression (economics); Geriatric Depression Scale; Psychological intervention; Mental health; Prevalence; Population; Meta-analysis; Epidemiology","score_opus":0.09170105938148994,"score_gpt":0.3486791579248762,"score_spread":0.25697809854338627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7085148421","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006078642,0.9920364,0.00040052674,0.00019553633,0.000090171256,0.000382209,0.0005983703,0.000019381427,0.0001988267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13156633,0.86239904,0.0026041486,0.0006868221,0.00016841738,0.0013774347,0.0009738599,0.000017923483,0.00020610422],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.99258786,0.0026462593,0.002825119,0.0007264777,0.00095133827,0.0002629916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98220414,0.0123584,0.0029459852,0.0005009037,0.0017790124,0.00021152268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01187128,0.0022944403,0.014474031,0.008726728,0.00076232257,0.0034097037,0.0023018147,0.0017474231,0.0027100092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028415807,0.0015425832,0.032249164,0.008305148,0.0005902338,0.0016461398,0.0015944542,0.0014170598,0.0001940819],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010424878,0.000040048257,0.0075899297,0.6207412,0.35425326,0.00023993778,0.00017523381,0.000449614,0.00022334183,0.00012765272,0.0006882438,0.014429119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031276158,0.00024408704,0.00796688,0.068715416,0.92008245,0.0002617858,0.0001081697,0.00018411783,0.0001336468,0.00013458035,0.0018249879,0.000031106913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008305694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02236744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014474031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030592065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00562191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06278205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7092588826","doi":"10.57902/d7t01p","title":"Arctic Geospatial Data for Cold Region Transportation Infrastructure Analysis: High Resolution LiDAR Point Clouds along the Steese Highway, Alaska, 2023 - Site_9","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"California Digital Library","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geospatial analysis; Lidar; Terrain; Arctic; Point cloud; High resolution; Permafrost; The arctic","score_opus":0.05633738611340885,"score_gpt":0.30686148726080076,"score_spread":0.25052410114739193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7092588826","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017648485,0.00007034263,0.00011439436,0.00005733248,0.000035596306,0.000017478465,0.996707,0.0003555205,0.0008774396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018636314,0.000044039683,0.0004924007,0.000015003209,0.000004989919,0.000045147,0.9970632,0.00003106621,0.00044040632],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946636,0.00007066038,0.000062690946,0.0001566992,0.00014874515,0.000094965304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917006,0.00010709963,0.00007340247,0.00018254941,0.00034835862,0.00011849186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078970456,0.0012762662,0.0007227778,0.0019883902,0.00089828717,0.0011937727,0.0015401556,0.0010674853,0.013631846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018450333,0.0004858776,0.000921456,0.0037689658,0.0003886546,0.00068605866,0.0011922256,0.001281039,0.023711085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012663729,0.00012825559,0.007813644,0.000648275,0.000070009155,0.0001570691,0.00018569244,0.00221862,0.0006489919,0.00087001553,0.980253,0.0068797776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002107362,0.000041154566,0.041173536,0.00039610846,0.000052170017,0.0001471918,0.0008881031,0.0031645494,0.001453268,0.0012270574,0.9511715,0.000074770374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10384054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17051107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10384054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011066962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002162723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20647222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095338951","doi":"","title":"Older and Younger Adults &amp;apos; Strategy Use and Execution in Currency Conversion Tasks: Insights From French Franc to Euro and Euro","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Euros; Currency; Calculator; Older people","score_opus":0.16373481950879606,"score_gpt":0.3768363988746975,"score_spread":0.21310157936590143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095338951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991455,0.00008706683,0.000034218476,0.00002976286,0.0000026135885,0.000006162836,0.00004663393,0.0000014134066,0.0006466273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979791,0.00014161393,0.00016321456,0.00011439244,0.0000071754707,0.000022216247,0.00014341707,0.000004658324,0.0014242731],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952984,0.00007275035,0.000049747734,0.00010945895,0.00013197667,0.00010619299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725765,0.00094408763,0.0006267903,0.00012229658,0.00046632928,0.000582832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00203361,0.0004824667,0.0006261596,0.0012994498,0.0005852855,0.0019621116,0.00039741932,0.00088256935,0.0035263947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007584929,0.0003573871,0.00036899326,0.00048132797,0.0005883816,0.0017797296,0.0009829103,0.00090060587,0.00076192495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012205623,0.0017962556,0.76595783,0.00019301401,0.00011467526,0.00082794146,0.15555678,0.0002480042,0.0085102925,0.0004479103,0.001510381,0.06361639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049068538,0.00059492735,0.972463,0.000034865327,0.00003040303,0.00032579718,0.023764707,0.00042383213,0.00039038897,0.00048525742,0.0013980054,0.0000397982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01671086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024692554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01671086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039180752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028328612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033227146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096207395","doi":"","title":"Bristol-West Insurance Group","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autobiographical memory; Quarter (Canadian coin); Replicate; Affect (linguistics); Order (exchange); Event (particle physics)","score_opus":0.31110862206404466,"score_gpt":0.4300136630334191,"score_spread":0.11890504096937443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096207395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045288517,0.003200183,0.00024166454,0.0046295724,0.0015857244,0.00010368794,0.013277381,0.00049030286,0.97194266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015704779,0.0018363241,0.00025868983,0.00078551826,0.00027878472,0.000062417006,0.004888433,0.00019791773,0.9759871],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938536,0.000058896116,0.000036078916,0.00017810377,0.00023353321,0.000107972664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878794,0.000262832,0.00011397978,0.00015864326,0.00021792676,0.0004587248],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004972388,0.00082188577,0.0004776872,0.001268925,0.0010115308,0.0022541874,0.00064074126,0.0018496177,0.8347325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002500978,0.0003189058,0.0002772961,0.0012093564,0.00044341432,0.0015079776,0.0015833647,0.0017747249,0.5936586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051293185,0.000120584424,0.0022887213,0.00018590773,0.000019298473,0.00067276345,0.000086939384,0.00010865454,0.0015671483,0.007945862,0.7618464,0.22464481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067547706,0.0000785081,0.004484085,0.00012428877,0.0000043021537,0.00030166467,0.000061571314,0.00008013001,0.00021256927,0.00090432283,0.9936725,0.0000084720605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030147242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053564045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16526753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009392698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010190532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2357341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096652463","doi":"","title":"Saskatoon by","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Inference; Advice (programming); Probabilistic logic; Psychological research","score_opus":0.2675328607806963,"score_gpt":0.41625043682881846,"score_spread":0.14871757604812214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096652463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036738552,0.0031538596,0.0013602992,0.0029530013,0.0016203634,0.0001459223,0.007740421,0.0005501985,0.9788021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008461445,0.0020795825,0.0009270479,0.0008527145,0.000064579406,0.0000637682,0.0027626674,0.000318449,0.9844698],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999241,0.00011910108,0.000050126,0.00026042465,0.00018864263,0.00014069746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903584,0.00018626444,0.00006959649,0.00013810655,0.0003207361,0.00024958738],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066240225,0.0011815019,0.00076378486,0.0012399997,0.0025442408,0.0059486744,0.00091304386,0.0017051704,0.8316692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018366606,0.0005122664,0.0006071945,0.0022135917,0.0008348942,0.0027665747,0.0038640262,0.0020989997,0.62144524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005670901,0.00024743663,0.0042923028,0.00085618877,0.000064529355,0.0019064342,0.00096627616,0.0005618609,0.004206655,0.04158757,0.52084386,0.42389983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022843979,0.0000160502,0.0015041283,0.00016569933,0.000006711975,0.00019103859,0.00029935077,0.00009262432,0.00021069511,0.0012659739,0.9962154,0.00000944097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02332563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044703584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16833079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022482001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004134661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24010336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099027828","doi":"","title":"1What Works in Youth Literacy and Why? A Literature Review and Discussion","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Process (computing); Apprenticeship; Adult literacy; Information literacy","score_opus":0.07325185133720459,"score_gpt":0.39269316766594603,"score_spread":0.31944131632874145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099027828","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009326569,0.8262481,0.00068195636,0.1460677,0.0007990868,0.00006964801,0.00017659516,0.000012458262,0.016617803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.102462776,0.8744848,0.0011236548,0.018418228,0.0012908394,0.00013306046,0.00013221952,0.000010727941,0.0019437432],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943996,0.003569827,0.0003800666,0.00038315656,0.000843164,0.00042412922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9587938,0.033809748,0.0018549778,0.00024923918,0.0047242087,0.0005680504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015256808,0.0005570246,0.0014387642,0.007561838,0.0023632015,0.006266855,0.0012778497,0.0030224433,0.0069479495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026194397,0.00027964968,0.0008556491,0.0109568285,0.0046473485,0.0077195275,0.0015410401,0.0022599872,0.000673676],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002830219,0.00026910473,0.026800781,0.05078434,0.00047629178,0.001869258,0.03510011,0.0005174195,0.000290887,0.10529644,0.06409524,0.7142171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008486978,0.0003533638,0.061748423,0.21850044,0.0010713428,0.0024483162,0.17617545,0.00062521757,0.0004934004,0.07818579,0.46020472,0.0001087841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042927794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.076209016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042927794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00832186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016621158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08535588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099757122","doi":"","title":"and","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Value (mathematics); Constant (computer programming); Risk aversion (psychology); Marginal utility; Social risk","score_opus":0.2769398743294252,"score_gpt":0.4611550126299083,"score_spread":0.18421513830048314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099757122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066563343,0.0011033338,0.03996223,0.012296851,0.0052191787,0.00032845244,0.0060633696,0.0016632307,0.9267071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07734143,0.0011551108,0.028672472,0.0066605518,0.000815811,0.00031880525,0.0063540973,0.0008112499,0.87787044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984882,0.00019528165,0.000076580975,0.00056509266,0.00039412125,0.00028081003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988858,0.0001732792,0.000068782225,0.00030918384,0.00045946674,0.00010335809],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010615466,0.00066344783,0.00046054838,0.0008384695,0.0024907899,0.004004361,0.0010745703,0.0016243065,0.36891717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038624976,0.00024650933,0.00066298427,0.00069650606,0.00089862535,0.004303252,0.0025811165,0.002015301,0.16990063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018463965,0.000071251685,0.0014808839,0.00023002115,0.000029426326,0.00030085808,0.00072096713,0.00061581895,0.0014877743,0.5448479,0.29878357,0.15124692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015489604,0.0000268607,0.0011587645,0.00006980157,0.000011736719,0.00034673835,0.0003127581,0.0006805093,0.0009980632,0.08178978,0.9145648,0.00002468871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047306516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039243964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63108283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010703417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011693616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7101023960","doi":"","title":"（Universite de Montreal）","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalizability; Axiom; Social choice theory; Axiomatic system; Consistency (knowledge bases)","score_opus":0.12750768242649715,"score_gpt":0.42608275963802605,"score_spread":0.29857507721152887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7101023960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015569286,0.01635099,0.004020458,0.01902495,0.002973888,0.00033469693,0.019555753,0.0009979329,0.92117196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040408906,0.0037464045,0.0022269557,0.00074272073,0.00022174,0.000097885226,0.0029262635,0.00016696283,0.94946223],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982153,0.00015460628,0.000055675726,0.00066164025,0.0005684267,0.00034429948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983271,0.0003091689,0.00010147911,0.00014583756,0.0006684273,0.00044797323],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072648097,0.0014021832,0.0011333018,0.0012265916,0.0029421356,0.0043182597,0.0019471713,0.0010998615,0.54120195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030025512,0.0004985542,0.00058851903,0.002067242,0.0014975523,0.0012966595,0.0017090566,0.0012427357,0.14906093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007566946,0.0002933237,0.007295221,0.0014288927,0.00015322976,0.0019447958,0.0017125566,0.0012290603,0.003700223,0.10396411,0.49754313,0.37997878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090487854,0.00006223689,0.010798394,0.00033382847,0.000039454902,0.0003473961,0.00038165244,0.00058354577,0.0011801452,0.005209111,0.9809147,0.000058976206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40478832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46913445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5952117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008438482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00681548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8048644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106607324","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5793943","title":"The Two-System View of Cognition and Investor Choice","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Cognition; Portfolio; Construct (python library); Mutual fund; Foundation (evidence); China","score_opus":0.055868020568518695,"score_gpt":0.3679582268284272,"score_spread":0.3120902062599085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106607324","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1261358,0.0052795783,0.7154642,0.032413892,0.0005629021,0.00011336312,0.00047242834,0.00021300554,0.119344816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93618053,0.0020017182,0.051409137,0.00093776063,0.0006965118,0.00012893367,0.00010349199,0.000031127198,0.00851082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979361,0.0011387427,0.00007928622,0.0003143607,0.00033403546,0.00019747434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949132,0.0038491618,0.00032649736,0.000344421,0.00035182392,0.0002149049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032289897,0.000735419,0.001035076,0.0012926396,0.0005003497,0.0063652536,0.0010942979,0.0027501592,0.010442288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057831137,0.00038004806,0.001197068,0.0009266157,0.003559286,0.0077849105,0.001350693,0.0019454281,0.00073448784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005164199,0.000026998883,0.00047164393,0.00006106172,0.00004835445,0.000044233828,0.00011865243,0.0033434087,0.00035255286,0.99026054,0.0005006526,0.0047202464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000197366,0.000014059572,0.00028168046,0.000007420725,0.000009872899,0.00002709857,0.000026330266,0.009163404,0.00007432656,0.98985684,0.00051133835,0.000007935489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013804224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006298663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010442288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015767097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010416891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03493291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111063317","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5873302","title":"Salience and Generalized Empirical Likelihood: An Equivalence Result","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Salience (neuroscience); Empirical research; Calculus (dental)","score_opus":0.10357480049007324,"score_gpt":0.43331488017316927,"score_spread":0.32974007968309604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111063317","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15174526,0.0024202717,0.80502003,0.009371986,0.00023198625,0.00016115843,0.00041471387,0.0002994745,0.030335132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93013215,0.002123931,0.058447335,0.001241593,0.0013726207,0.00018619084,0.00027764746,0.00022080638,0.0059977686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937085,0.0029228444,0.00040442563,0.001363209,0.0010623847,0.0005387255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8710741,0.1121299,0.0049855406,0.006769619,0.0034959603,0.0015448563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012297097,0.0011085428,0.0031635857,0.0034561306,0.0012410879,0.00619407,0.0031379994,0.0032591764,0.010053147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10802608,0.0011763675,0.0021251815,0.0030727526,0.0064334925,0.014160199,0.005537262,0.0043017603,0.00066747254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001765295,0.0001660484,0.0034849695,0.00026097381,0.00017992439,0.00023752556,0.00057468115,0.0087490305,0.0008776077,0.9531595,0.001713606,0.030419774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028620714,0.000028845108,0.0011872803,0.00002056342,0.000038556416,0.00011226181,0.000046479672,0.027400644,0.0001156253,0.9706442,0.00035747234,0.00001944395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015007141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007255456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012297097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001889249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012163817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06503403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116077166","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5935973","title":"Separating Preferences from Endogenous Effort and Cognitive Noise in Observed Decisions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Noise (video); Task (project management); Cognition; Risk aversion (psychology); Preference elicitation; Decision theory; Loss aversion; Cognitive bias","score_opus":0.20523897607501995,"score_gpt":0.3901757407236675,"score_spread":0.18493676464864756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116077166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.824521,0.0004242394,0.16798581,0.0012757812,0.000053121363,0.00006177031,0.00019198898,0.000085994136,0.005400421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991879,0.0002100885,0.006082258,0.00008864939,0.000042945176,0.000025321253,0.00006369849,0.000021889071,0.0015862555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965995,0.0017094536,0.00020628858,0.000661198,0.0003975649,0.00042609105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8883569,0.102115035,0.004807014,0.0027096919,0.0009742311,0.0010370142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00984928,0.00071850105,0.0014812181,0.0008085877,0.0003293467,0.004343174,0.0011102527,0.0020472286,0.0029183766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0714694,0.0011322718,0.0011612506,0.00092115585,0.0020974611,0.004431339,0.0015338047,0.0024791874,0.000276771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002804814,0.0011671337,0.106038116,0.0009633326,0.001134982,0.0010626306,0.0024257186,0.24798971,0.008545555,0.53103423,0.0013580926,0.095475696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013086839,0.00023599436,0.044991415,0.000067445435,0.00022255274,0.0001662822,0.00034313754,0.58623666,0.0018209269,0.36528912,0.00038096568,0.00011463011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031465804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00256518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00984928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012331917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000859185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05208862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124203608","doi":"10.65109/vxdr3212","title":"Preference elicitation for risky prospects","year":2010,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Preference elicitation; Cumulative prospect theory; Preference; Expected utility hypothesis; Utility theory; Prospect theory; Expert elicitation; Decision theory","score_opus":0.20600924919862232,"score_gpt":0.42222833304038043,"score_spread":0.21621908384175811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124203608","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03466297,0.00013844502,0.9564873,0.00038141376,0.00003290908,0.00046366086,0.00041054498,0.00048838725,0.00693427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36159036,0.00023459287,0.6333861,0.00027528332,0.00004630474,0.0010395125,0.000618564,0.00010653305,0.002702828],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98643494,0.008905074,0.00087233697,0.0008220051,0.002655304,0.00031034768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96630627,0.023914944,0.001358371,0.0053132144,0.0025591236,0.0005480906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087465495,0.0007615911,0.0008173625,0.00094188616,0.0006186394,0.0015539816,0.0010371183,0.0011749391,0.009298273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047134854,0.00030666994,0.00076729344,0.0012971688,0.00070782483,0.0033321988,0.0024104111,0.0014477293,0.0014324732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018021483,0.0005728668,0.005032594,0.0015439913,0.00015195944,0.000610385,0.00406837,0.036670633,0.058649693,0.19837558,0.011543467,0.68097824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003985937,0.0009430309,0.004967294,0.00030681994,0.000111533904,0.0012012176,0.001731493,0.4982496,0.056385,0.3929266,0.04251856,0.0002602564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031000818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005568123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009298273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005528013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075055857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04625672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132945037","doi":"","title":"Looking for bias in all the right places: Incentive-driven optimism and pessimism","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Preference; Incentive; Optimism; Moderation; Negative information; Independence (probability theory); Empirical evidence","score_opus":0.17175842694787613,"score_gpt":0.4638478915355451,"score_spread":0.292089464587669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132945037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8524893,0.0073132664,0.03132255,0.04078715,0.00022799632,0.000054692715,0.00015618917,0.00009103043,0.06755782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901305,0.001009076,0.0059240125,0.0014030793,0.00008390658,0.000015187441,0.000036585556,0.000014525414,0.0013831555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989241,0.0005406103,0.000044464832,0.00017953421,0.00021496243,0.000096368654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915696,0.005001855,0.0017903236,0.000702824,0.0004034664,0.0005319815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033669646,0.00024035946,0.00030856833,0.000547782,0.0007053888,0.0039637513,0.000404088,0.0013737568,0.0043617547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0154308975,0.00039157804,0.00047237216,0.0004660497,0.0031913845,0.0028618604,0.0012652556,0.002471546,0.00043479935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010884852,0.00059954805,0.23002623,0.00074147066,0.00056251086,0.0008109138,0.027919728,0.007925235,0.009114502,0.48019204,0.01183771,0.22918165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015584414,0.0002939792,0.15770307,0.00053886394,0.00021503313,0.00112681,0.0056358934,0.013951519,0.0020727857,0.8030207,0.015129837,0.00015561869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070774014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008998459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043617547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008063594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052260223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01780641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134111940","doi":"10.61190/fsr.v16i2.4883","title":"savings and investment decisions of planners","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Financial Services Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Pension plan; Pension; Propensity score matching; Marital status; Investment decisions; Investment (military)","score_opus":0.06792927124473518,"score_gpt":0.38226944721733114,"score_spread":0.31434017597259595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134111940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997092,0.00020511783,0.000099769015,0.00028809163,0.0000029710993,0.00001096859,0.00011148511,0.0000015902679,0.0021880204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871206,0.00014183327,0.00008807434,0.000026478023,0.000003774041,0.0000048222087,0.00010475708,5.171104e-7,0.0009175535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994487,0.00030833954,0.000029445755,0.000041718,0.00007121718,0.000100515506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719846,0.0009294799,0.0011396656,0.00008107481,0.00017069335,0.00048065095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017894802,0.00014388427,0.00018705399,0.0005006338,0.00031655276,0.0008354488,0.00010932141,0.0002987256,0.0050694197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007967359,0.00012215409,0.00019161793,0.0005576653,0.00023594813,0.00035300353,0.00035645018,0.00029411077,0.00039791767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006156512,0.0003672211,0.94238764,0.00004550218,0.000068968104,0.00018428646,0.0010709412,0.0050922036,0.00022820757,0.0018649407,0.0019346358,0.04613983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104683466,0.0005555126,0.97286123,0.00004058537,0.00004795351,0.00017249299,0.003955056,0.008458564,0.00028696255,0.005745579,0.0077459505,0.00002554739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00487418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008607557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050694197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005156833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054285256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016958833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135882875","doi":"","title":"Deceit behaviour","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Bristol Research (University of Bristol)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Infection and Immunity","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.35549755117579823,"score_gpt":0.4377643900348535,"score_spread":0.08226683885905528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135882875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039548587,0.0037968708,0.017994601,0.0073226457,0.00066953903,0.00009075573,0.0005446632,0.0002028201,0.92982954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4187567,0.0026821077,0.004264452,0.0017826081,0.0002575839,0.00007290502,0.00043258467,0.00010967682,0.57164145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910575,0.0002763751,0.00003503199,0.00013217783,0.00031759747,0.0001329939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689204,0.0011360216,0.00046308938,0.0007511609,0.0005311812,0.00022646318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00113717,0.0004553641,0.00032401978,0.0010387527,0.0014254317,0.0028241929,0.00048363672,0.0017976656,0.06763266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009969639,0.00021033543,0.00026148508,0.00070791825,0.0016655173,0.002211256,0.0012290693,0.0020415823,0.010703574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002440851,0.00012866563,0.008148715,0.0003225022,0.000058970432,0.0008738456,0.0071830424,0.0016526519,0.0022865983,0.5652267,0.14756322,0.26631102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029646912,0.00019233352,0.020845234,0.0007638176,0.000055259516,0.0042692535,0.004317912,0.0068384637,0.0028793286,0.24635768,0.7133425,0.00010858475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034923078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004438021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06763266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009823256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004738306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22625381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139219557","doi":"","title":"Integrate Risk in the Timing of Outcomes","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Stochastic dominance; Expected utility hypothesis; Axiom; Outcome (game theory); Subjective expected utility; Axiom independence; Predictive power; Rank (graph theory); Isoelastic utility","score_opus":0.07715566139754573,"score_gpt":0.3672824648566934,"score_spread":0.29012680345914765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139219557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64735603,0.00074245135,0.33165818,0.00093238277,0.000069532536,0.00010296587,0.00016607574,0.00009896542,0.018873286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868593,0.0001862524,0.01175408,0.0000495594,0.000031682306,0.000028640576,0.000048785,0.000009202184,0.0010325811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972337,0.0012548465,0.00014589,0.00047617086,0.00063931645,0.0002501504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828547,0.011457321,0.003173285,0.0014025887,0.00065808225,0.00045391938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057091247,0.0006513396,0.0006125972,0.0007810218,0.0003791931,0.002304611,0.0007517257,0.0008432331,0.0027636033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025744844,0.00037335046,0.00079145195,0.000597562,0.0012912177,0.0039798366,0.0014733264,0.001336968,0.00026420888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014807013,0.0005429419,0.08376254,0.0002488586,0.0003691739,0.0004257028,0.001351372,0.14468586,0.0068852603,0.50915843,0.00073470373,0.25035438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006864521,0.00066784833,0.0363975,0.00007595884,0.00018770379,0.00031709802,0.00033199263,0.3078059,0.00482905,0.64593935,0.0032528439,0.00012616868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009534936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085606007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057091247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009901451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085064716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03019309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7154428261","doi":"","title":"Can an informative artefact induce sustainable behaviour in the French households? The answer of a cognitive transfer experience","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"GDG Environnement","funders":"Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; Universitaire Stichting","keywords":"Cognition; Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Perception; Affect (linguistics)","score_opus":0.05063747139328725,"score_gpt":0.3199279015391101,"score_spread":0.2692904301458229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7154428261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.928568,0.0004924131,0.0036406703,0.0064956327,0.00005638971,0.000042348885,0.000027783832,0.000045592235,0.060631182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966793,0.00018261049,0.00042872914,0.00039225322,0.000013555629,0.000010388734,0.000010071335,0.0000060289367,0.0022770835],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736136,0.0019304771,0.00003190084,0.00013693681,0.00034819226,0.00019110866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971635,0.0018222225,0.00025719864,0.00029232973,0.00030894903,0.00015574927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031877416,0.00031370198,0.0001815941,0.0004933157,0.0019438945,0.0032775267,0.00038741092,0.0021728447,0.004131811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007129431,0.00015446144,0.00036879577,0.0003498716,0.0055630887,0.0025974174,0.0013534668,0.0010234524,0.00025352786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046542307,0.0008633955,0.040817305,0.00038934159,0.000086099164,0.0030158898,0.7053073,0.0012324718,0.017599735,0.13062371,0.0055768965,0.094022386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010048757,0.0017017139,0.098581806,0.0004101087,0.00012929479,0.002188823,0.61104196,0.0032103762,0.011003391,0.04940185,0.22203283,0.00019742965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013043066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006634111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013043066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026015714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005868733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025934339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W74042481","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2490695","title":"Half-Full or Half-Empty? A Simple Model of Decision Making Under Risk","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07232507915644121,"score_gpt":0.3770293633081054,"score_spread":0.3047042841516642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W74042481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4765449,0.0015194914,0.41533738,0.020236598,0.00037540658,0.00022890189,0.0012323573,0.00042457087,0.08410052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96614,0.00039971815,0.018219544,0.000526366,0.00012388929,0.00011311283,0.00012294286,0.000037131107,0.014317408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765426,0.001264337,0.00009122219,0.0003392014,0.00024337611,0.00040763195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99223936,0.005315264,0.0005128507,0.0006229357,0.0003428943,0.00096663286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034738139,0.00085517514,0.0019970273,0.0007199977,0.0009719099,0.005027438,0.002727699,0.004005624,0.018393833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013903902,0.00071409094,0.0015556832,0.0009803916,0.0031943743,0.008203631,0.0024098116,0.0031602597,0.0014989896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007042256,0.00031664025,0.001769677,0.00016974946,0.00011115149,0.00048819376,0.0006640559,0.09477016,0.00070525194,0.8768792,0.0043784473,0.019043285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009930662,0.000088020235,0.00037358527,0.000020057838,0.000025682271,0.00011461471,0.00019660742,0.21361266,0.00009702654,0.7842777,0.0010551168,0.000039666713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028870516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016152106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018393833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009756246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013086281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06153351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W75541930","doi":"","title":"Minimally Restrictive Decision Support Systems","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Normative; Decision support system; Component (thermodynamics); Risk analysis (engineering); Decision aids; Artificial intelligence; Business","score_opus":0.10593555851139856,"score_gpt":0.39234231939882025,"score_spread":0.2864067608874217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W75541930","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33258966,0.0007172523,0.61530495,0.002009487,0.0002479137,0.0008998388,0.0011994145,0.006002036,0.04102942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8155798,0.00026297773,0.17519197,0.0004895657,0.00012921948,0.00056782423,0.0010349493,0.00010763946,0.0066360366],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99515474,0.0018647453,0.0006709866,0.00089293596,0.0011781007,0.00023849671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972431,0.016111972,0.0021662882,0.006148423,0.0022368727,0.00090554723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043204688,0.00091138587,0.0006759514,0.0010777803,0.00068954483,0.003186713,0.0018836377,0.0011088923,0.011576288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024322255,0.00048315316,0.0006164173,0.00090015755,0.0007523047,0.0031502051,0.0026402373,0.0013263229,0.0022527464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021933117,0.0022560547,0.03662667,0.0015502842,0.00047788583,0.00096977025,0.0028222692,0.052083492,0.043788277,0.15122081,0.016289512,0.6897217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006657904,0.0020018402,0.024836395,0.00045861752,0.00045564168,0.0018651331,0.001194849,0.5144595,0.023573777,0.3126468,0.11745163,0.0003900184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007637405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007109786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011576288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005303467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091315556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03872657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W803079709","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336746.013.7","title":"Looking Backward and Forward on Hindsight Bias","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Hindsight bias; Overconfidence effect; Debiasing; Psychology; Cognitive bias; Cognitive psychology; Futures studies; Social psychology; Cognition; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.1838910036281605,"score_gpt":0.3246528075504059,"score_spread":0.14076180392224538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W803079709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07538225,0.14906412,0.1516674,0.040269364,0.0060101626,0.00016603488,0.0007220429,0.00050123944,0.5762174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66822976,0.10498824,0.0657927,0.013702797,0.0046662693,0.0001807856,0.00058943086,0.00029967315,0.14155036],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992083,0.00025112205,0.000056806035,0.00016863366,0.00024651733,0.000068638874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99537224,0.003460723,0.00032127416,0.00024166178,0.00047463566,0.00012942382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024093003,0.0006175305,0.00046246074,0.0012556764,0.00046966228,0.002221123,0.00065626646,0.0010430203,0.013601074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008937287,0.00022158514,0.00054588274,0.0010683348,0.0028531773,0.0043047187,0.0010139806,0.0022352897,0.0032302374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027910827,0.000054686676,0.0054680523,0.00043710746,0.00005387397,0.00024925545,0.0008449594,0.0026832493,0.0027880897,0.43688652,0.040366475,0.50988865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002337534,0.00012119595,0.0077752564,0.0006808359,0.000044520453,0.0005956748,0.0003637398,0.0036825885,0.0013711624,0.89070946,0.09456445,0.00006778808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015493445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016828763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013601074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014466818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008099724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0455001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W803144238","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12326","title":"Contracting with private rewards","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Moral hazard; Incentive; Microeconomics; Reservation; Principal (computer security); Private information retrieval; Balance (ability); Benchmark (surveying); Work (physics); Economics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Function (biology); Principal–agent problem; Participation constraint; Business; Computer science; Mathematics; Finance; Computer security; Engineering","score_opus":0.1875806383379456,"score_gpt":0.3555044006104599,"score_spread":0.1679237622725143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W803144238","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1371262,0.0014150664,0.70169026,0.008273926,0.00042439546,0.00032951238,0.0006394859,0.00024998127,0.1498512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.925009,0.0009888987,0.035081364,0.00043552188,0.0002914443,0.0002358136,0.00018451114,0.000041279414,0.037732165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99594563,0.0023810503,0.0001534387,0.0004760048,0.00052690436,0.00051704433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922247,0.004094762,0.0010443607,0.0013917024,0.00060724135,0.00063729665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004987523,0.0008810721,0.0012186709,0.00057981035,0.00088822714,0.0026529117,0.0013340344,0.0026335532,0.010541051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011428215,0.0005930665,0.00093282043,0.00073687715,0.00252924,0.0026586484,0.0019748942,0.0025182865,0.0013349907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007716541,0.00009194029,0.00054221135,0.00006822512,0.00002159299,0.00016368058,0.00014522386,0.06285122,0.00033854716,0.91937155,0.002331883,0.013996839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096371805,0.00007123979,0.00032903615,0.000041483916,0.000014966832,0.00014903002,0.000058961148,0.23819202,0.00025350027,0.75420535,0.0065645766,0.000023398257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002751011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016092897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010541051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020062756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031319568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03526336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W877610250","doi":"","title":"The Effect of Age and a Pop Out Distracter on the Attended Field of View (AFOV) With Divided Attention","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Psychology; Gerontology; Optometry; Medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09797660349281546,"score_gpt":0.4268323304460995,"score_spread":0.328855726953284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W877610250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978259,0.0002859608,0.00033675737,0.000039878763,0.00003464902,0.00001296348,0.00008503551,0.000010966493,0.0013678911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790645,0.00008330912,0.0003102742,0.000049771817,0.000040322517,0.000018704131,0.00009171749,0.000034077068,0.001465452],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909997,0.0002859747,0.000069623,0.00020685053,0.00015114858,0.000186356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94465995,0.047681868,0.002978855,0.0017782119,0.0008606271,0.0020405496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017608451,0.0006132237,0.00069860945,0.00058751943,0.00025982503,0.0010432841,0.00082003913,0.00093138876,0.008765667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03405021,0.00042487186,0.0003875846,0.0003875489,0.0006122199,0.001281654,0.0009862934,0.00078222435,0.0005688182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.30973738,0.009834442,0.24730943,0.000965813,0.00088294665,0.0020514585,0.0031252024,0.0062754718,0.29773566,0.0022699714,0.0021855829,0.11762671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002218023,0.015834277,0.92793506,0.000121930316,0.0013420646,0.0016110089,0.00077861856,0.01673874,0.026524337,0.0054120133,0.0013674059,0.0001164996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030289837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016336698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008765667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036276624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059347815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029324055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W88940488","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-12-800090-8.00002-0","title":"What Intuitions Are… and Are Not","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"˜The œPsychology of learning and motivation/˜The œpsychology of learning and motivation","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11877221066892774,"score_gpt":0.37859345632917035,"score_spread":0.2598212456602426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W88940488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014853312,0.041202687,0.09505057,0.2596626,0.010409415,0.00008266656,0.0005720116,0.0004608651,0.57770586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6602342,0.04300211,0.07994838,0.07676715,0.010264911,0.00033302966,0.00070571597,0.00086170604,0.12788278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997355,0.001244791,0.00012272049,0.00034979143,0.0007666419,0.00016117957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930854,0.004421325,0.00043397382,0.0008657503,0.0009412125,0.00025243353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049989866,0.0006240874,0.00071305217,0.0011086874,0.0010171429,0.005817469,0.0010747325,0.0021160648,0.008010842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015509668,0.00054830336,0.00061875704,0.0007504803,0.018077815,0.017906105,0.0010510549,0.0058330884,0.003759305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013348009,0.000019534606,0.00020173864,0.00014792813,0.000027390819,0.000025656042,0.00067235023,0.00028785667,0.00011080182,0.9494717,0.023476105,0.025545549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036986366,0.0000027510007,0.00013249338,0.00006636637,0.000004805986,0.000025734025,0.0001444357,0.00022070829,0.00006450737,0.967524,0.031802107,0.000008391611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017564972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001210254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008010842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019717782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017679696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026798904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W899746788","doi":"10.3758/s13421-015-0535-1","title":"Additional evidence for a dual-strategy model of reasoning: Probabilistic reasoning is more invariant than reasoning about logical validity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Probabilistic logic; Psychology; Deductive reasoning; Probabilistic argumentation; Reasoning system; Logical reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Logical consequence; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4938834877903444,"score_gpt":0.43840408084048743,"score_spread":0.05547940694985698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W899746788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6805246,0.00074675976,0.19995315,0.010512473,0.000611649,0.00015977683,0.002339687,0.00095937174,0.10419253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98482347,0.00017555535,0.009726743,0.0009774026,0.00029461316,0.000043572676,0.0010869374,0.00021795815,0.0026538435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946313,0.0010119108,0.0005325237,0.0020229416,0.001466253,0.00033509708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8770878,0.066548705,0.010465562,0.03654954,0.0060287616,0.0033196935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009683245,0.00080629915,0.0013108043,0.002438371,0.00073181855,0.0063409223,0.0031927668,0.002550551,0.035559926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07317303,0.0007685734,0.002220131,0.0019081486,0.0049654907,0.012998688,0.0031475183,0.003566455,0.0024873093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004787681,0.003421143,0.11462449,0.0015300538,0.002371875,0.0011333704,0.0045867134,0.008741553,0.04446849,0.6445821,0.012370816,0.15738168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003816826,0.00038621528,0.10299064,0.00008138365,0.00045270982,0.00119448,0.00043073556,0.043492753,0.0067129075,0.8401737,0.003527438,0.00017534298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001635409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000783217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035559926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008717518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010906808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118959785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W90283668","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500005933","title":"Decisional enhancement and autonomy: public attitudes towards overt and covert nudges","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Boettcher Foundation","keywords":"Subconscious; Covert; Nudge theory; Vignette; Psychology; Social psychology; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Cognition; Affect (linguistics); Psychological intervention; Cognitive psychology; Applied psychology","score_opus":0.11235741014067416,"score_gpt":0.3859037021502991,"score_spread":0.273546292009625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W90283668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923522,0.000055191846,0.0007691813,0.0007264625,0.000012590065,0.000013904496,0.0000045186557,0.0000043500186,0.006061685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99967337,0.000020342468,0.00011433884,0.00006853697,0.000006218354,0.000004703055,0.0000017175018,8.927753e-7,0.00010987096],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932319,0.0047184937,0.00017675664,0.00029260264,0.0011660111,0.00041428112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96162814,0.026208198,0.0072600986,0.002159852,0.0012736936,0.0014700326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00912945,0.00020940657,0.00019728225,0.0005169718,0.0009114848,0.0023614406,0.00022788094,0.00106989,0.0024406745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028274894,0.00015594324,0.00026904015,0.0002471603,0.0034146914,0.0011909044,0.0014330586,0.0019886522,0.00012392887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006033931,0.0069778813,0.5875546,0.00066451676,0.0004800529,0.0013441049,0.09396528,0.0040309806,0.042598028,0.095228605,0.0030882205,0.15803379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048141155,0.004347493,0.7990395,0.0003744456,0.00029199893,0.0009306819,0.0788786,0.012704384,0.023134045,0.054344658,0.0252112,0.00026173244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006465178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070021575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00912945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011766225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005363623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04828173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W996677107","doi":"10.1007/s00213-015-4029-4","title":"Genetic influences on delay discounting in smokers: examination of a priori candidates and exploration of dopamine-related haplotypes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychopharmacology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse; National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism","keywords":"rs4680; Discounting; Impulsivity; Haplotype; Delay discounting; Addiction; Psychology; Association (psychology); Genetic association; Medicine; Allele; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Genetics; Developmental psychology; Biology; Genotype; Neuroscience; Gene","score_opus":0.12593544063690687,"score_gpt":0.42272670838131193,"score_spread":0.29679126774440506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W996677107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992575,0.000059932885,0.00033418636,0.00004469825,0.0000051562574,0.000003148505,0.000062170984,0.0000021936235,0.00023109304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940836,0.000024520063,0.000250185,0.00001494716,0.0000044525586,0.0000032015569,0.00003259328,0.000005257335,0.00025650248],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987155,0.0007211153,0.000075306794,0.00025398016,0.00013218228,0.00010184511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99460214,0.0037478458,0.0004628115,0.0005241541,0.00015502819,0.00050800684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024058726,0.0004831481,0.0005077672,0.000665609,0.00057366746,0.0006934683,0.00047940665,0.00093060196,0.0030718967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047564665,0.0003472801,0.0007844435,0.00050183875,0.0005826159,0.00039158104,0.00049056666,0.0009906008,0.00012681719],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006691994,0.00063630985,0.9569719,0.000026812877,0.0010527463,0.0004910353,0.00075297646,0.000497132,0.025538133,0.00094485807,0.00007933604,0.0063168867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054261833,0.00071399676,0.99200624,0.000010930871,0.00043258854,0.00046594994,0.00027437694,0.0032745553,0.0014829976,0.0010267781,0.00023675927,0.000020659048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003661749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004503969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003661749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019542205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034373868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012723565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}