{"meta":{"query_hash":"65359dfc4ac5","filters":{"topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions"},"cohort_total":608,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":608,"exported":608,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/65359dfc4ac5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Dispute+Resolution+and+Class+Actions"},"results":[{"id":"W110006713","doi":"10.29173/alr327","title":"R. v. Cairn-Duff: A Look into Media Access to Court Exhibit","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statutory law; Jurisprudence; High Court; Political science; Power (physics); Common law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02583819133579809,"score_gpt":0.2894003685191828,"score_spread":0.26356217718338476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W110006713","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05257665,0.018340718,0.0015208444,0.07033251,0.0011570592,0.00024644964,0.00031036485,0.00017605773,0.85533935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4747317,0.008528935,0.002944686,0.17077777,0.00083332614,0.00023879214,0.00017507734,0.00009101492,0.34167868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995363,0.0005564675,0.00011616612,0.000533367,0.0019217453,0.0015092592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954471,0.0028473875,0.00012245723,0.00017350259,0.0009928496,0.00041663763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035502193,0.0004195769,0.00040537372,0.0028471453,0.016070323,0.008500811,0.0034376516,0.023275139,0.006227699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007510766,0.0010462835,0.0007550026,0.0022949937,0.0070407996,0.0024410274,0.0020586671,0.009664409,0.00073098385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010220658,0.0000632717,0.0042799893,0.00020756715,0.00002670995,0.0060340487,0.009945676,0.00047245718,0.0021643667,0.76373255,0.18282638,0.030144785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012186584,0.0001907662,0.023814607,0.00091452966,0.0001245694,0.0018254583,0.0054006395,0.0013532633,0.0018056653,0.04650995,0.9176593,0.00027933437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84124935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93537694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15875065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029674957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036849786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3193711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1142058392","doi":"","title":"Certification : the procedure, its role in class action proceedings in Ontario and the proposed South African certification procedure","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Certification; Class action; Class (philosophy); Commission; Political science; Action (physics); Law; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Public administration; Business; Computer science; Sociology; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.05664111418784133,"score_gpt":0.25776741644743245,"score_spread":0.2011263022595911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1142058392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22637156,0.0031868196,0.015101469,0.05610598,0.0005732352,0.002114183,0.00022735579,0.00015432846,0.69616514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7305962,0.0016483096,0.013267467,0.0045849057,0.00013928844,0.00060567295,0.000073254116,0.000039389215,0.24904567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921514,0.00104231,0.0004879484,0.0007316104,0.0033195177,0.0022672706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933428,0.0023363777,0.00061703165,0.00055511063,0.0021991627,0.0009493917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070259427,0.00027403553,0.00022601441,0.0014724566,0.0155755365,0.0076939096,0.0018567124,0.0066841864,0.005027519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015021477,0.000600139,0.0004862983,0.0014721173,0.014317045,0.0028829898,0.0031427373,0.003447822,0.00065201847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050777544,0.00006119809,0.0069441884,0.00013483361,0.000007305633,0.0011251604,0.01528483,0.00075842935,0.0020359394,0.93486893,0.011275443,0.027453028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013870472,0.0002985506,0.061697226,0.00080628117,0.00008815508,0.0012102273,0.016503548,0.0052925143,0.005504331,0.08214039,0.8259171,0.00040296858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82721037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9142614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17278963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04767355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12228263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3476144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W116841366","doi":"","title":"Mediation Outcomes: Lawyers’ Experience with Mediation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses (University of Wolverhampton)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Lawyer supported mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Conciliation; Law; Psychology; Dispute resolution; Political science; Family mediation; Dispute mechanism; Social psychology","score_opus":0.011849410526024482,"score_gpt":0.19485452347852975,"score_spread":0.18300511295250527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W116841366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92242056,0.0029643623,0.0053510633,0.012374335,0.00022494789,0.0002442811,0.00006444803,0.00012294183,0.056232978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99181014,0.00075747335,0.0007543997,0.00068391924,0.000056662135,0.00006465684,0.000029143339,0.000035772333,0.0058078105],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95425636,0.0336461,0.0011429384,0.0015952622,0.004571161,0.004788179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93393344,0.05091578,0.0056407675,0.0017231964,0.003812214,0.003974671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029271595,0.000494059,0.00083447853,0.0020089278,0.017151443,0.01372782,0.0032801102,0.0049412055,0.013277392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09436372,0.00069547107,0.00047360596,0.002133971,0.010982224,0.008144006,0.013843383,0.007106778,0.0012264415],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008792901,0.00020806614,0.003646658,0.00012661319,0.000012016837,0.001992473,0.96304065,0.00012440796,0.0007233364,0.00782647,0.0015323529,0.020679096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029429908,0.00020955213,0.0032424887,0.00018899997,0.000014203753,0.0011687394,0.94367933,0.00028066002,0.0006218526,0.0029631865,0.047548324,0.000053174776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052021053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077871834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029271595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057821674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005087019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15480483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W12184388","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1173","title":"Collaborative Family Law and Gender Inequalities: Balancing Risks and Opportunities","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Settlement (finance); Family law; Process (computing); Work (physics); Political science; Power (physics); Law; Inequality; Alternative dispute resolution; Empirical research; Public relations; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.1207567725947849,"score_gpt":0.2813467608021537,"score_spread":0.1605899882073688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W12184388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5793262,0.017517168,0.008744874,0.09447222,0.00051250734,0.00008241669,0.000087617474,0.000027003207,0.29923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99445975,0.0015051427,0.00037404985,0.0009966574,0.00011397991,0.000025053756,0.0000051792445,0.0000038009678,0.002516411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946339,0.0029158497,0.000091845344,0.00033217817,0.0006836516,0.0013425058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926905,0.0045374427,0.00096658315,0.00026364942,0.00033609752,0.001205757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005386767,0.0002661389,0.00031653797,0.0013802672,0.008679452,0.0062997714,0.000834916,0.002135087,0.008076728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013272845,0.00015959905,0.00022163543,0.0008464729,0.014664669,0.00643145,0.008266498,0.0018026901,0.00022112693],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011266663,0.00013402775,0.050256994,0.00016132626,0.000024257037,0.0012304884,0.10523592,0.00020127643,0.0002547959,0.6772385,0.0045046974,0.1606451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004616522,0.00030068716,0.05703097,0.0015760997,0.000055955406,0.0031752472,0.3924072,0.00069814676,0.00061025796,0.41321984,0.13080724,0.00007224262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00796958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018154532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008679452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038418577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040800637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028488278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W12850442","doi":"10.5204/qutlr.v8i1.108","title":"Repositioning the Legal Profession in ADR Services: The Place of Collaborative Law in the New Family Law System in Australia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT Law Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal profession; Legal service; Family law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.03221755296594033,"score_gpt":0.28909863066747915,"score_spread":0.25688107770153884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W12850442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7036578,0.02840752,0.0028754869,0.12367067,0.00040214328,0.00015332857,0.000027943292,0.000024115358,0.14078103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98523664,0.004057018,0.0008563794,0.002591329,0.00009040589,0.000019612284,0.000005106523,0.0000067207184,0.007136784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98871624,0.0059852106,0.0004097356,0.0007140374,0.002116193,0.0020584802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98304754,0.006742135,0.0028304448,0.0006939638,0.002969643,0.003716301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010677193,0.000102270395,0.00042317598,0.0024457683,0.013085741,0.011420083,0.0017347151,0.0043638693,0.004515028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019137155,0.00042743562,0.00027264468,0.0024587954,0.018333843,0.0065117152,0.008480362,0.0043617277,0.00032647996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007875453,0.0002610733,0.02809648,0.0007840162,0.000021704578,0.004811878,0.29682493,0.00054890336,0.00093899353,0.4401938,0.010897726,0.2165418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057480727,0.00042826083,0.16811654,0.0022514672,0.00005072226,0.005003638,0.247932,0.0026142697,0.00063962745,0.042707726,0.53003305,0.00016519777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19940382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3241629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19940382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021727933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033527497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39648634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W134366855","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of the Class Action Trial in Ontario","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Political science; Mathematics; Computer science; Physics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08337747519756936,"score_gpt":0.27982955310317403,"score_spread":0.19645207790560468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W134366855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5161943,0.0034442658,0.0042040837,0.10350672,0.00080797344,0.0008961718,0.0004842386,0.0001358663,0.37032646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92820984,0.000901068,0.0013399639,0.0046827663,0.00007032454,0.00012482685,0.000079198566,0.000063172236,0.064528786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97260326,0.0053199828,0.0012572431,0.0026314887,0.009657316,0.0085306475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.950816,0.016860485,0.004306804,0.0032080503,0.014568496,0.010240241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016566519,0.00022247342,0.00073246536,0.002256914,0.051115874,0.014530341,0.004570999,0.006265673,0.008345721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05878733,0.0011500583,0.0006511162,0.004660712,0.023558538,0.0038659663,0.010744667,0.007169268,0.00050390203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033469955,0.0002482896,0.040265232,0.00051341794,0.00011213447,0.005423441,0.27412525,0.0014070267,0.001983694,0.53265023,0.04087878,0.10205783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009861325,0.0001553554,0.07866965,0.0005437205,0.00009164343,0.00046506702,0.1584534,0.0016810722,0.0015435531,0.023241298,0.7347722,0.0002844058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97817653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99112344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2476443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2476443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29357094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87262595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W140134012","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4492","title":"Judging Fairness in Class Action Settlements","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Settlement (finance); Human settlement; Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Political science; Civil procedure; Doctrine; Face (sociological concept); Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; History; Epistemology; State (computer science); Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.043845894160854444,"score_gpt":0.313256852687802,"score_spread":0.2694109585269476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W140134012","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0897625,0.008030512,0.5642375,0.051129084,0.0068171364,0.0023408018,0.00021124906,0.0004652196,0.27700603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8301815,0.001431221,0.14912304,0.0041386764,0.0029047308,0.0008450875,0.000091043075,0.00016436227,0.011120343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.79060584,0.120183274,0.014193225,0.01563213,0.05087235,0.008513125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69523424,0.22232275,0.015779128,0.017695624,0.044609297,0.0043589557],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21519947,0.00094710634,0.0027517932,0.00796424,0.012498483,0.018924441,0.004925104,0.012028411,0.006385812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.441365,0.0008239269,0.0015894203,0.00260233,0.031498406,0.019104324,0.011772073,0.009152127,0.0011229358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007832075,0.000031306423,0.001476796,0.00012600028,0.000038112725,0.0002201931,0.0041167806,0.0012498213,0.00027000168,0.9593572,0.004501811,0.028533693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008862809,0.0000732734,0.001173109,0.00036407623,0.000054359964,0.00011987574,0.0017250981,0.0053829686,0.0011049217,0.95615774,0.033662938,0.000092989845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068291435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21519947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008410121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015018175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96779877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1417239235","doi":"","title":"Sports dispute settlement and the building of a sports mediation system in China.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"journal of physical education","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Arbitration; Settlement (finance); China; Political science; Mechanism (biology); Alternative dispute resolution; Institution; Confidentiality; Law; Public relations; Business; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0038026652443983954,"score_gpt":0.24488398571499426,"score_spread":0.24108132047059586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1417239235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75235313,0.0038536694,0.012224782,0.0314387,0.00037574657,0.00079714454,0.00017381331,0.0001499335,0.19863302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97765326,0.0005657993,0.0030743028,0.0005412907,0.00004230677,0.000102908205,0.00007050177,0.0000058458304,0.017943807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723,0.00068067556,0.00014294632,0.00022730452,0.00066909444,0.0010500986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982065,0.00020815144,0.00029568767,0.00012556542,0.0003376267,0.0008264896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039067897,0.00021943265,0.0002147118,0.0012708064,0.007835356,0.0043179854,0.0013073911,0.0015601038,0.0073166806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003660335,0.00029798318,0.00048198912,0.0012909472,0.00348127,0.0031994525,0.0035172396,0.0011563001,0.00036664374],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023179362,0.00034486872,0.09239748,0.000440562,0.00009592624,0.003974127,0.014052473,0.008462232,0.002609792,0.7432001,0.019317837,0.114872746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007731776,0.00064433005,0.31101823,0.0007211727,0.00028379186,0.0016532716,0.024178883,0.04888715,0.004956276,0.22492597,0.3816165,0.00034124934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11861883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11076463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11861883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010053327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0347657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23585683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1461146254","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1119","title":"Are National Class Actions Constitutional?: A Reply to Hogg and McKee","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Jurisdiction; Constitution; Class (philosophy); Law; Political science; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Certification; Class action; Forum shopping; Sociology; Business; Computer science; State (computer science); Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0323886932225302,"score_gpt":0.2671243874355879,"score_spread":0.23473569421305773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1461146254","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064954493,0.002397358,0.00041378033,0.9925759,0.0011490008,0.0000036377785,0.000021180247,0.000007826489,0.0027817518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035517003,0.004019755,0.0009772367,0.94834036,0.0057650334,0.000038588576,0.000023378207,0.000035358833,0.005283377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992349,0.0027042567,0.00035955576,0.0016813554,0.0021069208,0.0007989503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.956301,0.03592533,0.0012467317,0.0012080518,0.0037010263,0.0016179554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02301545,0.0007070474,0.00145146,0.0011494763,0.010043968,0.010170652,0.0056843003,0.045565948,0.008395632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044731114,0.0007883782,0.0010033079,0.001930461,0.036357697,0.028880835,0.0066232253,0.03908581,0.0022377935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003855983,0.000029294568,0.0005500713,0.00009916719,0.0000142013,0.00022330874,0.004127601,0.00018782984,0.00009083447,0.51236194,0.47202206,0.010255104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000981168,0.00002776224,0.0011168664,0.000492366,0.000022087555,0.00029718725,0.008823087,0.00048290312,0.000313983,0.41624388,0.57194257,0.00013924146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04898247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04848003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04898247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011739498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012737348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121718824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481730860","doi":"","title":"유엔전자협약의 주요규정의 개요와 실무적용상의 유의점","year":2006,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"한국사회과학연구","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Electronic communication; Law; Neutrality; Autonomy; Political science; Law and economics; State (computer science); Scope (computer science); Business; Telecommunications; Engineering; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.009657428843057824,"score_gpt":0.20924711512124186,"score_spread":0.19958968627818405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481730860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005534202,0.005885618,0.020218005,0.030449891,0.009032832,0.00028576786,0.0008400377,0.00043726334,0.9273164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09885251,0.006697441,0.014344672,0.011619577,0.0023480474,0.00038501254,0.0012247212,0.00024539023,0.8642826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754673,0.00060670293,0.00012807919,0.00040233726,0.00094854215,0.00036750274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984085,0.00022469606,0.00012974223,0.00017021976,0.0009134127,0.00015346913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021002295,0.0004465458,0.0002575434,0.00085720577,0.0025969828,0.006099487,0.00095128367,0.0015844166,0.059312355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042048288,0.0001938742,0.00047363597,0.0009491077,0.002105097,0.0029264062,0.0016896084,0.0022958477,0.03701376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051712534,0.000047082372,0.001282464,0.00028220692,0.000010934485,0.00027492162,0.0033593348,0.0002791369,0.001055464,0.5969837,0.30242002,0.09395306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021954245,0.000015391635,0.00074287265,0.00010417208,0.0000036123738,0.000092881615,0.00082301267,0.00014934519,0.00039949047,0.015225853,0.982429,0.00001219731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007867035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006583201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059312355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024371953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033323127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19841963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486075422","doi":"10.1007/s10726-011-9248-4","title":"Arno R. Lodder and John Zeleznikow: Enhanced Dispute Resolution Through the Use of Information Technology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Political science; Computer science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.037593043393858876,"score_gpt":0.2293356323867757,"score_spread":0.19174258899291682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486075422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03607398,0.05322214,0.32744277,0.24332231,0.0052840807,0.00042942291,0.0005573851,0.00072847394,0.33293945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51299596,0.059497062,0.21370837,0.008852994,0.0025565906,0.00049096346,0.00034987062,0.00035673927,0.20119154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742436,0.0010995354,0.000108282584,0.00016929614,0.0010249256,0.00017361758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99216837,0.0058391425,0.00029301332,0.00034084308,0.0009780701,0.0003806229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00501848,0.00044441808,0.00039576378,0.0019810712,0.0019569257,0.006318725,0.0015170614,0.0027692348,0.016590588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016183287,0.00044887795,0.00034661838,0.002092666,0.001896356,0.010137821,0.0034414611,0.0016442515,0.003172096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021901936,0.00009916579,0.0009390888,0.0005094728,0.000042817854,0.00040000194,0.0030245504,0.0019569837,0.0014915332,0.6875779,0.17253959,0.13119991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021472458,0.00007789954,0.0027429718,0.00055196,0.00011946014,0.0005623852,0.0036612824,0.016918974,0.009681469,0.42215,0.54313,0.00018887006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006685548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0120019615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016590588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014697186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017784279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055501044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486863590","doi":"","title":"Public Goals by Private Means, & Public Actors Protecting Private Interests: A Response to Professor Jones","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Class action; Action (physics); Law and economics; Class (philosophy); Political science; Consumer protection; Relation (database); Public choice; Law; Business; Public administration; Economics; Politics; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.03294260953511776,"score_gpt":0.26313293199988275,"score_spread":0.23019032246476498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486863590","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00051462784,0.0023174826,0.00024054207,0.99309397,0.000817176,0.0000027229678,0.000006415868,0.0000049227365,0.0030020429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041383952,0.0051974696,0.0009709571,0.9285169,0.0067544724,0.000049792478,0.000012205955,0.000049399572,0.01706483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817624,0.00795593,0.0006005469,0.0030351914,0.004717146,0.0019288658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96517986,0.028266737,0.0011997321,0.000811081,0.002813643,0.0017290054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0175551,0.0005756011,0.0013163214,0.0010941207,0.012377854,0.016841125,0.0044644577,0.053273167,0.0052515226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029276542,0.00075203454,0.0013229053,0.0022738262,0.037012424,0.026540356,0.0069303014,0.046522222,0.0010982879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002523587,0.000027529408,0.00017692207,0.00007408638,0.000006253504,0.00018647937,0.0029655998,0.00020037119,0.00011017184,0.6131058,0.37700123,0.0061203837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041355575,0.000032473086,0.00053429406,0.00025206644,0.00001023389,0.00024041046,0.00946564,0.0005849363,0.00025880904,0.20942698,0.7790559,0.00009693046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026170447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03199535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053273167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012883575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012031671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09347731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488666018","doi":"","title":"Coordinating Multijurisdiction Class Actions Through Existing Certification Processes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Plaintiff; Scope (computer science); Class (philosophy); Legislature; Law and economics; Competition (biology); Class action; Business; Process (computing); Subject (documents); Law; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08622341782960395,"score_gpt":0.3079450419084285,"score_spread":0.2217216240788245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488666018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16553791,0.0014050571,0.08858733,0.021793172,0.0009453771,0.0060482244,0.0004816375,0.0007915636,0.7144097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83241117,0.0005031042,0.039552357,0.00771405,0.00027869316,0.0011193033,0.00026936652,0.00012072692,0.11803104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9589953,0.0046091005,0.0018638829,0.0040957844,0.018734396,0.011701518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94425005,0.01613082,0.004530444,0.007471338,0.021999793,0.005617522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024500752,0.00046959543,0.0006625048,0.0028382784,0.012513793,0.010229282,0.005463815,0.005734959,0.014744565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038916655,0.0008115399,0.0008599513,0.002285895,0.0054022046,0.004113237,0.0069373534,0.0065267156,0.0018210835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040477558,0.0016597484,0.050361242,0.00057549414,0.000111498746,0.0018395198,0.014752858,0.011495562,0.017920965,0.54850507,0.085268125,0.2671051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006921548,0.0010585339,0.11157533,0.0011152136,0.00024176127,0.00097121985,0.012127294,0.025603633,0.018176908,0.07300073,0.75474656,0.00069062045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4032683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7302942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4032683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030568141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10570179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80184203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491036344","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1103585","title":"Disputants' Perceptions of Dispute Resolution Procedures: A Longitudinal Empirical Study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Perception; Alternative dispute resolution; Political science; Empirical research; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02638943786865492,"score_gpt":0.28778126604404664,"score_spread":0.2613918281753917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491036344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991509,0.000030505695,0.00003778673,0.00013249592,0.0000038906373,0.000014585222,0.00001809403,0.0000013515863,0.0006104771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987477,0.000053639476,0.00007867434,0.00012786094,0.000006847706,0.000024194389,0.00005960666,0.0000038013072,0.0008975857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943019,0.0024014052,0.00038184098,0.0004578226,0.001449014,0.0010080319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9444777,0.01948536,0.018398644,0.002663747,0.0068290774,0.008145524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010038925,0.0003145222,0.0007807007,0.0016078019,0.005408906,0.0060340194,0.0016714361,0.0027250396,0.0057385443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051621675,0.0009599828,0.0004496548,0.0014571492,0.0024464652,0.004383094,0.0028074568,0.006188501,0.0013852827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006421547,0.012326454,0.77905416,0.000041101135,0.000042370248,0.0006135023,0.19200814,0.00006636521,0.00096822984,0.0011670825,0.00061871135,0.012451777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107929445,0.002080225,0.76267797,0.000060375605,0.000050707706,0.00050893094,0.22960603,0.0006880728,0.00048362525,0.000651517,0.0030127338,0.00007179517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013189564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012407748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013189564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018912894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024378805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053091586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491899767","doi":"","title":"Are websites adequately communicating terms & conditions link in a browse-wrap agreement?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European journal of law and technology","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Business; Political science; Agreement; Sample (material); Law; Internet privacy; Advertising; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.03389165199408053,"score_gpt":0.2547184467241752,"score_spread":0.22082679473009467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491899767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63230956,0.0012929139,0.012324243,0.02579315,0.0002088882,0.00018045453,0.00025347032,0.00016089313,0.32747647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878626,0.0003630734,0.0019094981,0.0030438232,0.00005694275,0.00005572758,0.000073747324,0.000030850217,0.0066037904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9563595,0.01729543,0.0032451223,0.0020488894,0.01564965,0.0054014367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.894773,0.062130004,0.016582562,0.011282677,0.012232008,0.0029996156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026846904,0.00016595713,0.0003815859,0.0022937297,0.0084287925,0.013655917,0.0012321908,0.004007512,0.005017387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12557219,0.00044771898,0.00030216802,0.0037917618,0.010432782,0.012131279,0.0045836354,0.0034152516,0.0012932565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010363998,0.00020936829,0.06845558,0.00022687961,0.00003966488,0.00186216,0.2177063,0.00031983847,0.0017252158,0.55792403,0.022904115,0.12852319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046211804,0.0001464346,0.15837312,0.0014161954,0.00009583722,0.0018946648,0.33091402,0.0015895297,0.004368317,0.082049154,0.4188185,0.00028796843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041395903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040992815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041395903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00561533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011163205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14198166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494523486","doi":"","title":"Defendant Class Actions and the Right to Opt Out: Lessons for Canada from the United States","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Opt-out; Political science; Law; Action (physics); Certification; Opt-in email; State (computer science); Business; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.044019117962477754,"score_gpt":0.30584001703688674,"score_spread":0.261820899074409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494523486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3936021,0.01587137,0.0016165476,0.2125729,0.0007313453,0.00012433433,0.00096161815,0.000039131668,0.3744806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94347,0.004076736,0.00054777967,0.01546552,0.000104811326,0.000039320144,0.00017510913,0.0000427724,0.03607789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99080944,0.0012923458,0.0002272863,0.0005745863,0.0017917634,0.005304528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860702,0.004067989,0.0006435118,0.00048574505,0.0056128614,0.0031197746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062164594,0.00041463063,0.0011438843,0.0024242662,0.037830964,0.01587204,0.0035872057,0.010936817,0.012645092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021417383,0.0005394231,0.00095602474,0.0042131287,0.018327618,0.004682916,0.005187451,0.014828102,0.00059339305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024594137,0.00017726915,0.035507504,0.0001461682,0.00010595788,0.0010307563,0.051662017,0.0013791872,0.000250474,0.7642408,0.0918454,0.05340856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032256174,0.000116306546,0.1371044,0.00268139,0.0005161911,0.0004479014,0.19767724,0.0030521932,0.0010849935,0.14278108,0.5136394,0.0005762923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14446826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14446826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22942862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99229556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496473852","doi":"10.54648/erpl2008035","title":"Collective Enforcement of Consumer Law: A Framework for Comparative Assessment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Redress; Directive; Legislation; Law and economics; Business; Consumer protection; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.0530270916545711,"score_gpt":0.31021036528210905,"score_spread":0.25718327362753796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496473852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033247214,0.031558003,0.23442027,0.018643407,0.00046086838,0.0007020571,0.0006928166,0.00010851705,0.68016684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84144473,0.007965061,0.13560864,0.0012346102,0.00042571046,0.002841673,0.00051953114,0.0001033314,0.009856749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9577416,0.03617001,0.0007582127,0.0015689427,0.002615337,0.0011459024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9588428,0.033923857,0.001997846,0.0024069545,0.0022899413,0.0005385035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029748289,0.0008951528,0.0017194966,0.016457938,0.0059327898,0.0144474385,0.004006564,0.0043582297,0.018500835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029310733,0.0005395215,0.0017228329,0.015495774,0.026208194,0.017862083,0.009579632,0.0044147344,0.0006342279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007030907,0.000016407543,0.00019679262,0.00007834621,0.000016568289,0.000026448668,0.00061983697,0.00041266994,0.000011202575,0.9946903,0.0004862554,0.003438236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002913734,0.00007209456,0.00103399,0.00085546146,0.0000509977,0.000089013956,0.004546505,0.0053321426,0.000102895654,0.93911034,0.048750885,0.000026528001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008193697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056766705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029748289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017186267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048400257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15732586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499062029","doi":"","title":"Resolving financial disputes in the context of Australian and Canadian civil justice reform","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hong Kong Government","keywords":"Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Alternative dispute resolution; Context (archaeology); Dispute resolution; Mediation; Political science; Civil procedure; Dispute mechanism; Law reform; Public administration; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.028424719134683876,"score_gpt":0.19537311883406694,"score_spread":0.16694839969938308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499062029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5305201,0.016552411,0.00068888586,0.16949002,0.0005587103,0.00029910856,0.00023596312,0.000034609177,0.28162026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715921,0.00520245,0.0007634776,0.008655498,0.000103240454,0.000052296815,0.000048638773,0.0000063010907,0.01357599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98269,0.0040464075,0.00046984252,0.00060912495,0.003507536,0.0086770225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98368305,0.0040091258,0.0013772503,0.00047163086,0.006147538,0.0043113492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012591059,0.0002595415,0.00057749473,0.0036562071,0.03280458,0.013340755,0.0025544432,0.00501589,0.0043568783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028569078,0.0004283585,0.00051162526,0.0057053957,0.013053819,0.0032761355,0.0060782568,0.0054371348,0.00018852761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023376888,0.00028102176,0.023956403,0.00065331074,0.00008824638,0.0039876034,0.16673964,0.0036966857,0.0007536435,0.65937114,0.05307493,0.08716361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009869445,0.00012905606,0.13940413,0.00088853313,0.0001374181,0.00071584835,0.21411867,0.0033490767,0.0008158538,0.026205692,0.61378,0.0003569617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9846103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9913236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22707263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22707263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.206663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8964862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500890371","doi":"","title":"Sealing Orders After Sierra Club","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Club; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.007204871915606001,"score_gpt":0.2147203253851043,"score_spread":0.2075154534694983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500890371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17386363,0.00516261,0.019256854,0.032740686,0.005767786,0.0012338128,0.0021879775,0.0067357565,0.7530508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47147304,0.0015598646,0.012968221,0.0070735808,0.0013754418,0.00013679793,0.0010744798,0.00069233624,0.50364625],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906777,0.0006553049,0.0005513712,0.0009311131,0.0051328856,0.0020516152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856149,0.004295808,0.000926899,0.0027820272,0.0046909857,0.0016893839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044354517,0.00046597086,0.0006026921,0.002435707,0.010951823,0.006972969,0.0020783234,0.0054675005,0.06041593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022303142,0.00085583987,0.0006199282,0.0016520064,0.003265481,0.0037798295,0.0037171815,0.004178639,0.010475683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057518727,0.00045085006,0.018164875,0.00038353258,0.00005943221,0.009707008,0.008879293,0.0017385159,0.006415656,0.25948942,0.528463,0.16567318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007630962,0.00023463291,0.010626559,0.00034656527,0.000046394514,0.00076693925,0.0022864272,0.0024159537,0.005887482,0.008233995,0.9688686,0.000210166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21683142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33321822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21683142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008620999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0199712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43113863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502659735","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1071","title":"Self-Interest, Public Interest, and the Interests of the Absent Client: Legal ethics and Class Action Praxis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Premise; Praxis; Political science; Class (philosophy); Legal ethics; Professional responsibility; Law; Morality; Action (physics); Legislation; Jurisprudence; Professional conduct; Sociology; Epistemology; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.11192978409896134,"score_gpt":0.2768252285390797,"score_spread":0.16489544444011836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502659735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19156541,0.009785085,0.015742315,0.31420186,0.0003972623,0.00009706315,0.000030422967,0.000047543464,0.468133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839138,0.0006423955,0.0009539979,0.0033211284,0.00007842737,0.000031913005,0.00000384794,0.000010278724,0.011044238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98068684,0.0108698085,0.000548313,0.0010036438,0.0044662342,0.0024252478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98628694,0.008470799,0.0017202417,0.0008465675,0.0011893128,0.001486257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014937259,0.00023664565,0.00035694698,0.00080610975,0.011521197,0.01625589,0.0014963698,0.008250471,0.0021067034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021227766,0.00022747194,0.00021064574,0.00064190105,0.09423065,0.005996097,0.0046098153,0.0068826135,0.00027404024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060424195,0.000023381972,0.001149366,0.00002228599,0.0000026794796,0.00016572578,0.038678225,0.00007430286,0.00011547171,0.9503628,0.0022632724,0.007136515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002598522,0.000043675795,0.006034513,0.00039544492,0.00001211231,0.0004780501,0.09726916,0.0007490823,0.00061930745,0.7616447,0.1326695,0.000058496305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05084511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08210032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05084511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016469387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023241686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11949432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505551132","doi":"","title":"Class Actions: The Canadian Experience","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Punitive damages; Damages; Political science; Civil procedure; Commission; Economic Justice; Law; Class (philosophy); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.07552962021589309,"score_gpt":0.3288667592884061,"score_spread":0.253337139072513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505551132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13107462,0.019760739,0.0009846652,0.20898952,0.004442098,0.00025762996,0.0015800159,0.00014108949,0.63276964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6524788,0.023915878,0.001273864,0.054432143,0.0007286666,0.00015740002,0.00079531554,0.00032734603,0.26589066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883321,0.0011706555,0.00022588238,0.001013806,0.003822388,0.0054352633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98479986,0.001255033,0.00047879163,0.00049534405,0.003138582,0.009832429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068152994,0.0007301658,0.0008835706,0.0022528418,0.066295445,0.0126726795,0.004586839,0.005560108,0.038536962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012069728,0.00075777946,0.0009285932,0.0064424407,0.01848285,0.0047740713,0.009493723,0.010645648,0.0026867164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014217911,0.00043623536,0.017637385,0.00033251426,0.000041447413,0.002175687,0.15944529,0.0002509667,0.0003144935,0.216615,0.46509084,0.13751802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020958067,0.00002890655,0.0094978595,0.00025911527,0.000016567183,0.0002865523,0.050195284,0.00008442847,0.000073895055,0.0028104458,0.93666,0.0000658949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99292326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15664287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15664287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3028176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97817475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538445278","doi":"","title":"Using Arbitration to Eliminate Consumer Class Actions: Efficient Business Practice or Unconscionable Abuse?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Arbitration; Arbitration clause; Class action; Business; Law; Compulsory arbitration; Doctrine; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05785200713671081,"score_gpt":0.3094985422019726,"score_spread":0.2516465350652618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538445278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037357677,0.009757173,0.10885206,0.25648755,0.00087452104,0.00026489102,0.000074461,0.00018407074,0.58614755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8882476,0.003141418,0.024615256,0.037179366,0.0012411422,0.00038258175,0.000041101,0.000118037824,0.04503345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9553874,0.021169724,0.0018631538,0.0041305884,0.0131141255,0.004335052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9669328,0.020534918,0.0028246138,0.005824941,0.0033634799,0.00051922555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037852168,0.00062799884,0.0010216176,0.0017661982,0.0057261265,0.011946631,0.0038376863,0.012113611,0.006658127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0612819,0.0006294822,0.0009629154,0.0014200934,0.036914438,0.015344254,0.006114427,0.008587747,0.0016388748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004351791,0.000012576326,0.00016558432,0.00001298344,0.0000058672667,0.000036570815,0.0008467833,0.000082289196,0.00008149106,0.98932004,0.00276245,0.0066689067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007522737,0.000038365884,0.0007209115,0.00027623962,0.000032848708,0.00015121879,0.001241791,0.0015890187,0.0010425731,0.90429944,0.0904812,0.000051140534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012231132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013572117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037852168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054128296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01148087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20018381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538591131","doi":"","title":"Ten years after Halsey","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Appeal; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Party-directed mediation","score_opus":0.012075142555288418,"score_gpt":0.22474253554499274,"score_spread":0.21266739298970433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538591131","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006947354,0.052240543,0.003055135,0.49118087,0.11835715,0.00012399451,0.0006350187,0.00028507467,0.3271748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028882504,0.0073289736,0.0008001503,0.073096216,0.0036022994,0.00005120915,0.00013910444,0.00018774004,0.88591176],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964605,0.0007074737,0.00014626737,0.0009262706,0.0010451648,0.00071428705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964461,0.0005455225,0.0001153367,0.00021284512,0.0012684521,0.0014118517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030671514,0.0008130202,0.0006568932,0.0009466233,0.009087119,0.008290939,0.0010772388,0.0048110033,0.058457363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009226355,0.00038081294,0.0004912625,0.00065612484,0.005998368,0.006420837,0.007251582,0.013044773,0.022493333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008004775,0.00006035681,0.0004810062,0.00011823185,0.000008011607,0.0004577217,0.00241266,0.000058692618,0.0002034245,0.124922276,0.8233561,0.047841385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034426023,0.000015046709,0.00017650059,0.00008200169,0.0000012503393,0.000094440446,0.0006079664,0.000022145048,0.00010399592,0.004314611,0.9945702,0.000008347978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02564011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052094508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058457363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006720016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012068524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19555932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540075171","doi":"","title":"The Cultural Analysis of Class Action Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Legal culture; Action (physics); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Class (philosophy); Law; Political science; Epistemology; Geography","score_opus":0.013782410635674298,"score_gpt":0.2641725985168575,"score_spread":0.25039018788118317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540075171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08525839,0.01352434,0.030157402,0.024674146,0.0004133572,0.00005047318,0.00006452362,0.000025233016,0.84583217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98485076,0.004022638,0.0026908081,0.0009923577,0.00025978507,0.00004586108,0.000020754687,0.000015982127,0.00710097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693584,0.0018156187,0.000087810186,0.0001997736,0.000657578,0.0003033648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708945,0.0016896257,0.00040911508,0.00025916967,0.0003576344,0.00019503973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023863295,0.00033891143,0.00022867581,0.0030766726,0.004615102,0.00488379,0.0009920823,0.0010252564,0.0040028607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046511367,0.00015890888,0.00035804114,0.001880099,0.025839895,0.0044084764,0.0034974974,0.0018702496,0.00021639174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001361635,0.000005762559,0.00066509395,0.000018984998,0.0000026985888,0.000042209533,0.00623923,0.00012088707,0.000022284601,0.986616,0.00048587343,0.0057796384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058163378,0.0000151322265,0.005611401,0.00034150708,0.000013489757,0.00021198936,0.022269687,0.00095166726,0.00021356849,0.841579,0.12876762,0.000019083045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009030251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009030251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065058256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027072334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047203362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542563115","doi":"","title":"Lei Nº 11.411, de 04.01.2007 Aspectos práticos da separaçao, divórcio, inventário e partilha consensuais","year":2013,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Aequitas Revue de développement humain handicap et changement social","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.06618605139133038,"score_gpt":0.32439260205503684,"score_spread":0.25820655066370646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542563115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008608558,0.023110291,0.00525201,0.009911882,0.00822385,0.00068023446,0.028538449,0.005721889,0.9099529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026990293,0.016070299,0.003983089,0.0013898739,0.0021246462,0.0011128925,0.006880342,0.0025915995,0.93885696],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687105,0.000727526,0.00024585085,0.00061618746,0.0010068989,0.0005325203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998257,0.00053647615,0.00016259188,0.00019780363,0.00061959535,0.0002265586],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030235844,0.0016472891,0.0019576931,0.0050856364,0.0036373276,0.0081440685,0.0018133017,0.003909732,0.30467367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042921556,0.0011321903,0.0009945617,0.006260376,0.0024656632,0.0034350762,0.003903325,0.0044467538,0.27415058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086491083,0.000095040574,0.001773315,0.000987341,0.0000415459,0.0005777128,0.0031438917,0.00018131679,0.0041320673,0.09074039,0.6895629,0.20789951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049257756,0.000045009907,0.0025593245,0.0004681944,0.000009311502,0.00025923678,0.00038366666,0.000068165005,0.0010567392,0.002345871,0.9927187,0.00003643335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03793002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030029373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30467367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006673441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034819136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99179864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543914207","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2427868","title":"The 'Illusion of Compensation': Cy Pres Distributions in Canadian Class Actions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Class (philosophy); Computer science; Illusion; Compensation (psychology); World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Computer security; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.008814275749953282,"score_gpt":0.22475913508095294,"score_spread":0.21594485933099966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543914207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27562204,0.0015896949,0.0033032638,0.059211582,0.00019296003,0.000041140607,0.00023086925,0.00004111727,0.6597673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803284,0.00023939139,0.00017971442,0.0009811294,0.000031505344,0.000006940614,0.000015181673,0.000014423412,0.018203223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946616,0.0009270398,0.000108546286,0.00046675964,0.001743307,0.0020928734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99384105,0.0024950271,0.0004717708,0.00038895156,0.0019833124,0.00081990386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004454565,0.00021853691,0.0004079875,0.0020534054,0.021811318,0.012062817,0.0018053649,0.0044458825,0.017522497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021644576,0.00036967563,0.00028075543,0.0035022036,0.020291345,0.0048212265,0.005041026,0.006773022,0.00044011787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034935758,0.000014333491,0.003221493,0.000015040478,0.0000043357613,0.00010291905,0.023610042,0.00038310245,0.000090976326,0.9468708,0.0103017455,0.0153501695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067565365,0.000043492335,0.06442518,0.00032264955,0.000054125176,0.00027298654,0.12004821,0.0041753002,0.0006357877,0.3501669,0.45960602,0.0001818647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97794443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98328894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0896286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0896286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06817918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6503041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547302072","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i1.81","title":"Imperfect Information and Conspiracy Class Actions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Imperfect; Perfect information; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Frame (networking); Law and economics; Information asymmetry; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Algorithm; Linguistics; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.02560529321999288,"score_gpt":0.25492715708978314,"score_spread":0.22932186386979025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547302072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028921451,0.19047205,0.022383617,0.24767514,0.0014473177,0.00016204407,0.0006658322,0.00007780351,0.50819474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8504697,0.07384055,0.0045537837,0.040399335,0.0022751421,0.00013587833,0.00021347956,0.00002896774,0.028083103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95949024,0.012872389,0.0015358591,0.002198233,0.018637285,0.0052659875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9386456,0.042117056,0.0067963973,0.0029601704,0.008806022,0.0006747898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02230236,0.00046344593,0.00094362913,0.0034680248,0.005770469,0.010142406,0.0034439038,0.009025571,0.0030788144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054986283,0.0004664764,0.0010384574,0.0037774548,0.016926954,0.0064551844,0.0021814508,0.0071897097,0.00030617914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008954713,0.000006271568,0.0004992004,0.00012072411,0.000021136408,0.00011080771,0.0006788213,0.00089795946,0.000043894044,0.96818984,0.017003775,0.012418624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048554375,0.00003891881,0.008518893,0.0015647312,0.00012306905,0.00024002773,0.0019276565,0.00232694,0.0004898802,0.66727465,0.31733075,0.00011599657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38072208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4054083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38072208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026146548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028460663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75701207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562118918","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i1.41","title":"National Class Actions in Canada: Yet Another Call for Clarity and Coordination","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Jurisdiction; Redress; Class (philosophy); Construct (python library); Political science; CLARITY; Harm; Law and economics; Neglect; Ambiguity; Law; Sociology; State (computer science); Psychology","score_opus":0.07507675715600814,"score_gpt":0.29063499577474367,"score_spread":0.21555823861873552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562118918","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042696174,0.063445605,0.0061522988,0.6150282,0.0031738712,0.00016781101,0.00057839527,0.00014527127,0.26861247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80442476,0.024520893,0.007949361,0.099450156,0.0009787205,0.0001031069,0.00028866512,0.0001106831,0.062173646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775234,0.0032074945,0.000892977,0.0022844255,0.009747505,0.0063441927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971419,0.009773357,0.0015442005,0.0013958946,0.012455992,0.0034115296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018610572,0.00042988182,0.0012088623,0.0037562454,0.025085093,0.027510924,0.0050011408,0.010353934,0.005410553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0313085,0.0005471397,0.0009716215,0.0051474413,0.020965772,0.005596704,0.005960645,0.013350386,0.00029201384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023163448,0.000022024567,0.00243853,0.0002597197,0.0000382578,0.00028046267,0.008884943,0.0008496356,0.00027408803,0.8627485,0.080620445,0.04356028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046418587,0.000025982483,0.014728148,0.0011386913,0.00009384426,0.00012319817,0.01717401,0.001168045,0.0006022238,0.10436204,0.8603443,0.00019306544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99559516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22898082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22898082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4718674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.894273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567113716","doi":"","title":"Legal Issues of Consumer Protection in Group-Buying Online","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Group buying; Business; Order (exchange); China; Consumer protection; Norm (philosophy); Mechanism (biology); Internet privacy; Protection mechanism; Advertising; Legal norm; Marketing; Law and economics; Law; Commerce; Political science; Control (management); Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03507847628020245,"score_gpt":0.3238562249843726,"score_spread":0.28877774870417017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567113716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12249286,0.004081574,0.015161986,0.12671682,0.00066079135,0.00024469878,0.00015739883,0.00009478301,0.7303891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94140714,0.00090843806,0.0044653737,0.021323452,0.0006184024,0.00017745596,0.00005502249,0.000031983545,0.031012816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98299307,0.006372148,0.00099872,0.0023598042,0.0049889633,0.0022872877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97178113,0.017804498,0.0022473529,0.0033586863,0.0037285704,0.0010796494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018761523,0.00027456513,0.0004930287,0.0012772913,0.00974592,0.009572112,0.0025701637,0.0143561335,0.0075303763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029774345,0.00045880114,0.00074133,0.0013422065,0.019584944,0.008625377,0.0046317247,0.009695011,0.0007865911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018814291,0.000046535406,0.0019384088,0.00004281131,0.0000088340985,0.00067602453,0.008858756,0.00009425482,0.000356177,0.97050035,0.0072186165,0.010240402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009325455,0.00008690324,0.008829375,0.0010178381,0.0001059927,0.0016699971,0.013919391,0.0021634805,0.0022077858,0.6759937,0.29379302,0.00011934903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018113587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012818613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018761523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050419616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009634166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09922165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574463240","doi":"","title":"The Lack of Credibility on the Web and Its Legal Ramifications Under Quebec's Consumer Protection Act","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.02633044522448958,"score_gpt":0.18960737651050044,"score_spread":0.16327693128601087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574463240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22274227,0.018326966,0.0067554945,0.269908,0.0010930925,0.00013128141,0.0010944485,0.0001732657,0.4797752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9374125,0.0040567894,0.0012004663,0.01307278,0.00037573633,0.000058721598,0.00015458617,0.00003941205,0.043629076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842195,0.0032179863,0.0005614797,0.00082700036,0.009127689,0.0020462845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91671884,0.04254512,0.009356962,0.0044510188,0.024317423,0.0026106033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012047427,0.00021725672,0.00035747295,0.0040231603,0.013515304,0.011849045,0.0020556073,0.0058002933,0.010702529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055564262,0.00041435304,0.0002938081,0.004890585,0.012614741,0.005814116,0.00336046,0.0055441805,0.00075419433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009707616,0.000054054315,0.045616392,0.00035987154,0.000050994942,0.0025387208,0.05944555,0.00082420284,0.00077787455,0.6593595,0.113185,0.11769064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069129324,0.00007776341,0.1258175,0.0019348862,0.00013935598,0.0011047883,0.047454633,0.0023957237,0.001606365,0.05911716,0.75999576,0.00028696383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89153916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91639626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10846084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041922472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03747726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30417025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595734692","doi":"","title":"Defining Civil Disputes: Lessons from Two Jurisdictions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Variety (cybernetics); Dispute resolution; Civil litigation; Incentive; Political science; Civil procedure; Identification (biology); Law; Common law; Law and economics; Engineering; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.04099392401095025,"score_gpt":0.24947095109374362,"score_spread":0.20847702708279336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595734692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2081479,0.03784204,0.0813729,0.10667124,0.0009380884,0.00027697146,0.00008090271,0.00009650559,0.56457347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96845824,0.0059274095,0.013842727,0.004207101,0.000407628,0.0001243711,0.000032133103,0.00004856615,0.0069518927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97688043,0.015996957,0.0009679997,0.0011102522,0.0033628077,0.0016815666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753166,0.018500252,0.0012209531,0.0014695404,0.00227334,0.0012193641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023987655,0.00053868425,0.0011831146,0.003965663,0.013755704,0.019777106,0.0034138674,0.00844776,0.0030013423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034285743,0.00067053357,0.0010191643,0.0032273112,0.060957596,0.026696952,0.016578307,0.01166029,0.00047389427],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006194228,0.000022381213,0.0004581002,0.00002959413,0.0000033123988,0.0001522551,0.014211693,0.00021854967,0.000030610983,0.977508,0.0006992532,0.0066600037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033921973,0.000039021917,0.0013085972,0.00036355798,0.000011390614,0.00045069258,0.02580487,0.0012643011,0.00020228337,0.9148949,0.055590212,0.000036316625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021801375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020989686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023987655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013239992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009174719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12686032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599734003","doi":"10.29173/alr450","title":"The Substance of Procedure: Non-Party Disclosure in the Canadian and U.S. Online Music Sharing Litigation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Adjudication; Subpoena; Context (archaeology); Business; Copyright infringement; Political science; Forum shopping; Law; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.022029947291637375,"score_gpt":0.24016275125701297,"score_spread":0.2181328039653756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599734003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16022956,0.03572001,0.0038086982,0.10029328,0.000652368,0.00035258522,0.00034448892,0.00009812027,0.6985009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9233621,0.015805291,0.0025626046,0.02120499,0.00033273268,0.00010837414,0.00013508608,0.0000469519,0.03644189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9585101,0.0058973692,0.0014252925,0.0020607458,0.022482786,0.009623675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9709334,0.015729405,0.0023153052,0.0012850901,0.0074776676,0.0022591047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021374363,0.00049870415,0.00085302297,0.0064523104,0.033573568,0.023102466,0.0052682664,0.013176705,0.003690219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046536386,0.0007317948,0.0012633626,0.009315723,0.026342569,0.0050351913,0.0052277925,0.008551338,0.00038644488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034460387,0.000058185553,0.0031423348,0.00009583318,0.000023747538,0.0005336044,0.0077551194,0.0006412551,0.00025553736,0.94893926,0.013047111,0.02547359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024114893,0.0001578415,0.07639682,0.002013558,0.0005144579,0.0009906066,0.032572553,0.005022087,0.002726384,0.28262994,0.59601414,0.00072040263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9787796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98391485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13419501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13419501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26999843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97365755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605611576","doi":"","title":"There is No 'There' There: Intel v. Hamidi and the Creation of New Property Rights Online","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Legitimacy; Law and economics; Competitor analysis; Political science; Property (philosophy); Intellectual property; The Internet; Set (abstract data type); Action (physics); Proposition; Object (grammar); Property rights; Law; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; World Wide Web; Politics","score_opus":0.010208843196206616,"score_gpt":0.2279306982317812,"score_spread":0.21772185503557456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605611576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14552,0.0025866325,0.0025247429,0.11403755,0.00063485495,0.00005664853,0.000083685416,0.000059156286,0.73449665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9117816,0.0011211634,0.001125619,0.026375687,0.0003599431,0.000051547937,0.000034455505,0.000031591804,0.0591184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967709,0.0007040953,0.000077384655,0.00033329084,0.0009489875,0.0011654202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716467,0.0019451351,0.0002511226,0.00019054145,0.00022011984,0.00022836294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004196278,0.0001803725,0.00035212946,0.0007777954,0.014234671,0.012434273,0.001340849,0.013288104,0.005476277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076098186,0.00041108087,0.00029949038,0.0010590425,0.011743305,0.008880399,0.0029612193,0.011619076,0.00063942233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033896078,0.000039390103,0.0008717397,0.0000097822285,0.000002157287,0.00042165513,0.0055803764,0.00008318139,0.00011385063,0.9607817,0.027176721,0.004885579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017553968,0.000106408894,0.007449083,0.0003267427,0.0000629445,0.0009215955,0.019341577,0.0027257928,0.0028815109,0.46546063,0.5004103,0.00013793046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05747124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112636745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05747124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008919304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064360653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11427343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606628352","doi":"","title":"Consumer Dispute Resolution: The Evolving Canadian Landscape","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Dispute resolution; Legislation; Dispute mechanism; Class action; Online dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Business; Law and economics; Action (physics); Compulsory arbitration; Diversity (politics); Consumer protection; Political science; Law; Economics; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.011260054220001401,"score_gpt":0.20183401069197224,"score_spread":0.19057395647197084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606628352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036556978,0.10019163,0.0053762808,0.39195764,0.0016322683,0.00014897852,0.00078786263,0.00018348226,0.46316484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6710603,0.1694976,0.016706169,0.042668324,0.0011195947,0.00013135176,0.0008315886,0.00030394626,0.09768113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97681457,0.0026871557,0.0008363934,0.0023330867,0.012842506,0.004486206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96698403,0.0071737706,0.0014547252,0.00082430773,0.019111913,0.0044512087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019627716,0.00065387634,0.0010293081,0.010618593,0.03637732,0.030515164,0.0070593054,0.006443506,0.017562866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031089848,0.00097235217,0.00088229065,0.0203969,0.032085184,0.007320855,0.006291884,0.0063847597,0.00096131867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006693321,0.00006483183,0.0039734775,0.00051918445,0.00002445278,0.00047588142,0.00921553,0.0015802055,0.0002808927,0.7361237,0.079595625,0.16807918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002581494,0.000027593096,0.012555565,0.00093301834,0.000029600502,0.00026264327,0.015653426,0.0013732339,0.00027542867,0.041343335,0.92733496,0.00018534716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37076518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.37076518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43389332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72982323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1633913304","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1298","title":"The Digitization of Section 8 of the Charter: Reform or Revolution?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Section (typography); Charter; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017228994591146803,"score_gpt":0.2413007973754193,"score_spread":0.2240718027842725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1633913304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08892167,0.012412592,0.016493637,0.3097803,0.002573084,0.000097129036,0.00018204315,0.00019863294,0.5693409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8969828,0.0076158675,0.006145506,0.042019468,0.0014018503,0.00008302072,0.00014195392,0.00008387679,0.04552561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99439126,0.001577541,0.00019143806,0.0007401133,0.0019369817,0.0011627201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99406475,0.0025186907,0.0006540186,0.0012685037,0.0011825141,0.0003114997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070153023,0.00020182303,0.00034468228,0.0010186965,0.0039530783,0.010184044,0.0017917688,0.0036144126,0.0043188217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01595558,0.0002605578,0.00037642734,0.0014858631,0.029659063,0.00979195,0.002782921,0.0061666276,0.0004891169],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048853194,0.000005898859,0.00012921619,0.000011470231,9.815121e-7,0.000020215182,0.0015368075,0.00014941402,0.0000775044,0.9836357,0.004721232,0.00970663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027759877,0.000045451387,0.002141869,0.00041982916,0.00001542611,0.00009605042,0.0067424476,0.0007637572,0.0009935427,0.31979647,0.66889614,0.0000611554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21752107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18073964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21752107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02864752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03437092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4325099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1651525691","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.266932","title":"Is There a There There? Towards Greater Certainty for Internet Jurisdiction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Jurisdiction; The Internet; Business; Law; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics; World Wide Web; Geometry","score_opus":0.017971482761313128,"score_gpt":0.24938819268912768,"score_spread":0.23141670992781455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1651525691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12733272,0.0064790463,0.092153735,0.30827656,0.0012232969,0.00015777863,0.00027317528,0.00026486322,0.4638388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97842944,0.000721475,0.0071737217,0.006417608,0.0006669935,0.000058465477,0.000043573666,0.000058684007,0.0064300685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95893437,0.01801205,0.0024196822,0.0049656606,0.012038614,0.0036296446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86463916,0.08323705,0.012611843,0.015978472,0.016904209,0.0066293795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055819582,0.00037120402,0.0012556316,0.0032651967,0.008439807,0.0300368,0.0033058112,0.011701366,0.02603328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19049112,0.00087548775,0.0011472638,0.0021117085,0.024017602,0.052710783,0.019958768,0.016653916,0.0025229154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008086235,0.000046281537,0.001964797,0.00009866382,0.000023686815,0.00008025106,0.0051873983,0.00049952895,0.00020056406,0.9552108,0.0056466884,0.030960456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047729,0.00006650789,0.0021841691,0.00036754675,0.000047214442,0.00012956753,0.0058357767,0.0014157945,0.00044384223,0.9283561,0.061033726,0.00007199631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008464168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075455876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055819582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072877384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010536347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2952057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1652890660","doi":"","title":"캐나다 판례법상 행정조사의 절차적 공정성 법리에 관한 고찰","year":2012,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"한양법학","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Administrative law; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Political science; Process (computing); Law; Procedural law; Procedural justice; Legislation; Law and economics; Due process; Common law; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Municipal law","score_opus":0.022235202370268287,"score_gpt":0.24212204512744778,"score_spread":0.21988684275717948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1652890660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05714032,0.012364076,0.14136529,0.12962188,0.010461024,0.0009606948,0.00077703374,0.0004619493,0.6468478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7662839,0.006033658,0.053967416,0.05503008,0.0022257785,0.0007763194,0.0005447866,0.00018856846,0.1149495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96481866,0.010174884,0.0049938876,0.007933967,0.009063008,0.0030157191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97358036,0.008324837,0.004390011,0.005563505,0.00715298,0.0009882867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018736776,0.00044866107,0.0008355133,0.0011872676,0.005461489,0.010356524,0.0018057731,0.005572953,0.006817359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03296168,0.00056161225,0.0013486583,0.0015444756,0.02337519,0.007232544,0.00403042,0.007798776,0.0038724726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003698348,0.000034299643,0.0017045506,0.00018295401,0.00003557864,0.00030327795,0.0038414397,0.00023829089,0.0007944931,0.9581431,0.012997549,0.021687508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003829286,0.00021761395,0.00812549,0.00072964263,0.000112224436,0.0011932288,0.003719781,0.0009642946,0.00287844,0.35272047,0.6290799,0.00022075986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011276446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008140337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9887236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004801668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0138814235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099090755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W169944857","doi":"","title":"Family Law Arbitration in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.010866569381631806,"score_gpt":0.17895091186707185,"score_spread":0.16808434248544005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W169944857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63080436,0.011684881,0.0015355275,0.06812751,0.00065330276,0.00022148625,0.0022291278,0.000136502,0.2846073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90250915,0.0022253995,0.0008003542,0.0027728737,0.000046743382,0.000039068967,0.00028791212,0.000043819644,0.091274746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99407876,0.00057648215,0.00016235294,0.00047443947,0.0013110848,0.003396851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99007404,0.0016838118,0.00043005185,0.0002559977,0.004108631,0.0034474584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035774577,0.00022837512,0.00076769944,0.0022482397,0.023036968,0.006624226,0.0028123,0.0032873095,0.01731199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012157462,0.00057660596,0.0006771226,0.003935452,0.0034605595,0.0014715545,0.0026245958,0.0037666142,0.00060683634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005304736,0.0003077273,0.14889318,0.00030012146,0.00019417633,0.0029317532,0.02293032,0.00541494,0.00053310365,0.504534,0.18593748,0.12749274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003048277,0.00015146309,0.33378577,0.00076351286,0.00020552591,0.00095937913,0.04749238,0.010891524,0.0010671292,0.029302044,0.57477456,0.00030179854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99946994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.816079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18392095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3086204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.946536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1707700836","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720130902.5001","title":"Overview on Online Arbitration and Procedures (Jordan as an Example)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Database transaction; Settlement (finance); Business; Law and economics; Compulsory arbitration; Dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.040059493241874126,"score_gpt":0.27338824083160723,"score_spread":0.2333287475897331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1707700836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017433536,0.33337235,0.068729304,0.008045579,0.0031439494,0.0003984938,0.00028620975,0.00032821653,0.58395237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03445133,0.50354135,0.08708621,0.009067314,0.0069395914,0.0009264213,0.0011293115,0.0004592924,0.3563992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962108,0.0012194931,0.0004783585,0.0003210316,0.0014605356,0.00030981435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979298,0.0011316687,0.00016133091,0.00019202531,0.00046869472,0.000116524796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027345093,0.0009412756,0.00061301864,0.0062506706,0.0024865072,0.0067697414,0.001462071,0.0041609043,0.026858637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028417867,0.00063732394,0.00084882736,0.009483979,0.0032719558,0.010830012,0.0034202377,0.0033171868,0.016516872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024963356,0.00021176582,0.0003457155,0.0012477126,0.000011396993,0.00020555861,0.0009224212,0.0014333309,0.0007418301,0.4825651,0.09234972,0.41994047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016679649,0.000013760921,0.00023113097,0.0003607473,0.0000022763898,0.00018372075,0.00011585145,0.00024998104,0.00010764386,0.020854726,0.9778698,0.000008715199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005219893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051450855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026858637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033701903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041085985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08985108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1743983553","doi":"10.3968/3867","title":"Relationship Between the Media and Judiciary Under the Perspective of China’s National Conditions: An Analysis of “Media Trial”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legislation; Independence (probability theory); China; Political science; Economic Justice; Power (physics); Judicial independence; Law and economics; Law; Perspective (graphical); Administration (probate law); Sociology; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.048173911629470344,"score_gpt":0.34088813200312745,"score_spread":0.29271422037365713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1743983553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97555125,0.0002487463,0.00018274148,0.0011567425,0.000013162694,0.000019665848,0.000033583532,0.000002248217,0.022791887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897647,0.000081339516,0.000023181143,0.000037858546,0.000013334897,0.0000039885645,0.000016788383,0.0000010015623,0.0008459904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992766,0.00016170078,0.000038909726,0.00006555496,0.00017180765,0.00028541216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811757,0.00061924034,0.00046617887,0.00007274205,0.00043254148,0.00029178377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001099738,0.0001360868,0.00032387525,0.0021352954,0.001690842,0.0034021696,0.00051884225,0.00074250856,0.0054708053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021686235,0.00010012079,0.00040244992,0.00176256,0.002571668,0.0020377939,0.0014796822,0.0008490442,0.00017863799],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029599204,0.0004515092,0.6997626,0.00017696015,0.00019436047,0.0034256775,0.01839605,0.0025515393,0.0013509934,0.23960616,0.0036070375,0.0301812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028190021,0.00015483412,0.9421388,0.00009997109,0.00016752165,0.00013105146,0.024890184,0.00928279,0.00044332404,0.014867188,0.007755714,0.00004041991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028698483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034383044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028698483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040264823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003235442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057062864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1779670688","doi":"10.3968/5651","title":"Sociological Reflection on Cause of Multipartite Mediation Mechanism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in sociology of science","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multipartite; Mediation; Mechanism (biology); Social harmony; Harmony (color); Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Social science; Physics","score_opus":0.12131198339368064,"score_gpt":0.38165413493503836,"score_spread":0.2603421515413577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1779670688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124789335,0.006361518,0.140432,0.11273179,0.001458887,0.00019566751,0.00016815236,0.0001605378,0.6137021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844811,0.0012064172,0.0038544554,0.0012667227,0.00024711073,0.000062935906,0.00002731678,0.000030334833,0.008823505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99394023,0.0030538046,0.00021620223,0.00085958064,0.001231501,0.00069858023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99432665,0.0030668622,0.0006356468,0.00074660097,0.00094453077,0.00027954206],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074100634,0.00043574293,0.00051196135,0.0030170125,0.0066900244,0.0053335964,0.0013329496,0.0040357234,0.0071211653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00922699,0.00039630913,0.0007101927,0.0014875521,0.029515473,0.009488563,0.004915114,0.005329017,0.00040471213],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028141135,0.0000060913503,0.00029594326,0.000014586493,0.0000032085084,0.00010200611,0.0027733254,0.0001803826,0.0000482452,0.99478334,0.0007313867,0.0010586851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012149081,0.000012824586,0.00070719613,0.0000745616,0.000009089927,0.00029062823,0.0060631917,0.001254782,0.0002690716,0.9375411,0.053749584,0.000015789592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003662887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002610047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005060282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035892664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039188623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1838481767","doi":"","title":"Recognizing Multijurisdiction Class Action Judgments within Canada: Key Questions - Suggested Answers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Jurisdiction; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Key (lock); Res judicata; Political science; Civil procedure; Law and economics; Personal jurisdiction; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Computer security; Artificial intelligence; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.028629748491535625,"score_gpt":0.23948095618394216,"score_spread":0.21085120769240653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1838481767","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15468974,0.010837926,0.030949377,0.62042725,0.00095326646,0.00092479,0.0013716089,0.00019822035,0.17964779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94242543,0.006028603,0.02622821,0.010349929,0.00028394363,0.00022704901,0.000367708,0.00004479588,0.014044366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909025,0.0017441479,0.00045558906,0.0009105535,0.003327614,0.0026595686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684344,0.010818574,0.0025245633,0.0008650683,0.014621255,0.0027361047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0137950005,0.0004170163,0.0008195064,0.002486617,0.01991193,0.014716833,0.0044016466,0.006887651,0.007664572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06390138,0.0005751854,0.00063333305,0.005462357,0.013392163,0.011679115,0.0056898957,0.0061388807,0.0006621314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015405026,0.00016958137,0.053463753,0.0010546065,0.000067470246,0.0020323903,0.135644,0.003637119,0.0013789716,0.5149223,0.09392389,0.19355175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000450039,0.000023753191,0.06071058,0.001377754,0.000054497796,0.0005768295,0.5789953,0.008270281,0.0016470382,0.20384476,0.14416361,0.00029058143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9782138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9889447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070288576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.070288576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19067237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5099817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1842819733","doi":"10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020120805.1579","title":"The Improvement of Online Arbitration Rules of Evidence in China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Perspective (graphical); Empirical evidence; China; Key (lock); Computer science; Business; Political science; Law; Computer security; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06859906746311188,"score_gpt":0.3527006884592674,"score_spread":0.2841016209961555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1842819733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9236428,0.0025192464,0.02904956,0.008130436,0.00018843314,0.00037490705,0.00010575566,0.000073773466,0.035915233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98691314,0.00053621945,0.00801579,0.00021005426,0.00005012672,0.0000644817,0.00005757875,0.0000079398405,0.0041446956],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828318,0.00543614,0.003067637,0.001347629,0.0059785685,0.0013382382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9694774,0.015260887,0.004920452,0.0036545442,0.0057554063,0.00093132944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023184633,0.00021090056,0.00046059626,0.0023463515,0.0034941137,0.0052686706,0.0017744326,0.0017514161,0.0019464829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041648276,0.00037606742,0.00047668052,0.0028736917,0.0029631145,0.0038579374,0.0030098625,0.0011255635,0.000117031326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044986614,0.00029990159,0.13867317,0.0008259928,0.00018494348,0.0033405798,0.015227658,0.025779244,0.005661181,0.34008944,0.0075411624,0.46192688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003562467,0.00079623447,0.32920414,0.00093940215,0.0005504486,0.0022587017,0.011026155,0.17751947,0.026427949,0.21609202,0.2342998,0.0005294416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027236117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017987039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027236117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060897963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0157916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12261349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1848699812","doi":"","title":"Review of online dispute resolution: theory and practice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Current Legal  Issues","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber College","funders":"","keywords":"Online dispute resolution; Epistemology; Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Political science; Computer science; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03635722307979787,"score_gpt":0.3212478699113384,"score_spread":0.28489064683154053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1848699812","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001476376,0.95208764,0.002276261,0.027465671,0.0021363627,0.000032344153,0.00010398073,0.000025646454,0.014395759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037736364,0.9433197,0.0035534822,0.008599767,0.0037759545,0.00008746488,0.00023297648,0.000047605925,0.0026466988],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98546773,0.006810441,0.00141689,0.0011737237,0.004644796,0.0004864428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81568205,0.1481545,0.0065076435,0.0052553653,0.022480736,0.0019196662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02629937,0.00054955017,0.0014947142,0.010890902,0.0017202401,0.00818172,0.0030858666,0.0041978485,0.013047874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09603702,0.00054552796,0.00075507816,0.015174334,0.0051963073,0.009474577,0.003460553,0.003660667,0.0026129594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008924056,0.000101200945,0.00074882637,0.010087046,0.00008293073,0.000055881115,0.00068666745,0.00045760212,0.00019050098,0.04902038,0.08008293,0.8583967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035269113,0.000074987474,0.0022581567,0.02306871,0.00011844509,0.00022907947,0.001340797,0.00036688786,0.00032906944,0.02109473,0.9510565,0.0000274318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047645243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006372936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02629937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055752415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012656056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13908601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1852187843","doi":"10.4156/jcit.vol4.issue4.15","title":"A Study on The Global Standards Of The E-Trade Process on The Basis ebXML &amp; Web Services","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Convergence Information Technology","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Computer science; Web service; World Wide Web; Operating system","score_opus":0.012505489160287247,"score_gpt":0.2693499618575748,"score_spread":0.25684447269728755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1852187843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33329338,0.011270012,0.05629079,0.024699979,0.0005910368,0.00042595153,0.00018729172,0.00009527658,0.57314634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96466285,0.006171763,0.012319746,0.0017087774,0.0001171322,0.00010518304,0.00022417639,0.00007115839,0.0146191055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873761,0.005772631,0.0007804156,0.0010427102,0.004278109,0.00075011264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740272,0.013636604,0.0020567821,0.0024161637,0.0071212836,0.00074178795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014471894,0.00022258416,0.0001952615,0.0028897747,0.0022391842,0.0077935527,0.00070904475,0.0013467189,0.004348472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023795325,0.00017424535,0.00034934017,0.0063784583,0.0037791494,0.01027262,0.0015435985,0.002342321,0.00051168696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044101194,0.00013234644,0.019284958,0.00033421387,0.000012774516,0.00035844187,0.02156878,0.00094398414,0.0010744508,0.835417,0.0044136858,0.11641534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024432336,0.00032135236,0.06279248,0.0025575461,0.0000729666,0.0013435077,0.15231928,0.005407643,0.005848032,0.13878183,0.6304529,0.00007802154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067957127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037289362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014471894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047301217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071225986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07653558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1853758927","doi":"10.3968/j.hess.1927024020120301.1165","title":"Investigation on Civil Mediation Teaching Method Reform in Civil Procedure Law Course","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Bottleneck; Civil procedure; Process (computing); Political science; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Mathematics education; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03243190435074009,"score_gpt":0.3262689543716752,"score_spread":0.2938370500209351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1853758927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9524182,0.0009244221,0.013776412,0.0030627213,0.0001252128,0.00081496336,0.00004553655,0.000045748617,0.028786892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99041104,0.00045697187,0.0051790094,0.00025562418,0.000039198396,0.000286782,0.000043959946,0.000011358662,0.0033159996],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851087,0.009113841,0.000633314,0.00080068933,0.003415442,0.0009280792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759522,0.015208833,0.0022838924,0.001046101,0.0044759153,0.0010329556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015082782,0.0001786564,0.00025906338,0.0013055769,0.0016902463,0.0024946574,0.0010299874,0.0008722786,0.005489514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03584163,0.0002419307,0.00027174831,0.0015993218,0.0010781997,0.0029985441,0.0010879008,0.0010590743,0.00033493445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078377005,0.0022074596,0.21288633,0.0012163825,0.00006576814,0.0007705276,0.08606523,0.0013117477,0.013001029,0.07961267,0.0060903896,0.59598863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007038102,0.0026606864,0.63191247,0.0017591373,0.00057846884,0.0012492317,0.14941704,0.02921385,0.029592186,0.01738036,0.13532661,0.00020625489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005165878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051727593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015082782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057600527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007991271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07976627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1869956514","doi":"","title":"Online Dispute Resolution","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Online dispute resolution; Arbitration; Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Principal (computer security); Phenomenon; Law and economics; Political science; Presentation (obstetrics); Dispute mechanism; Law; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Mediation; Resolution (logic); Computer science; Sociology; Computer security; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.010328306847492304,"score_gpt":0.23404710638225487,"score_spread":0.22371879953476256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1869956514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015932329,0.003534844,0.1511498,0.021944694,0.0023894901,0.00056525605,0.00040679597,0.000714556,0.80336225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5387305,0.003178452,0.11497807,0.009548219,0.0022446746,0.00072135584,0.0009685534,0.00041752856,0.32921267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96974134,0.014241365,0.0017883339,0.0022758448,0.01014655,0.0018065054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95964277,0.02023816,0.0032755393,0.010563048,0.004413158,0.0018673001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018797293,0.000547893,0.00073567,0.0026668098,0.005927241,0.013237439,0.0038494766,0.005779454,0.059379652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047839653,0.00031976888,0.0007815362,0.0029712683,0.004358993,0.013963009,0.012846224,0.006016026,0.012661765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041262974,0.00014162555,0.0006844588,0.00011013727,0.000011351356,0.00019479162,0.0021313084,0.0005358441,0.0003230176,0.8381689,0.036361262,0.121296026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032122043,0.000053616164,0.0004059687,0.00023331659,0.000008911848,0.0003472517,0.0020193178,0.0028468706,0.0010110633,0.25238335,0.74063104,0.000027240158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011708596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013424795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059379652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027902022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037817205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1986447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1881465258","doi":"","title":"Whither Community Justice? The Rise of Court-Connected Mediation in the United States","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Arbitration; Economic Justice; Mainstream; Autonomy; Political science; Law; Independence (probability theory); Sociology","score_opus":0.028434947970839227,"score_gpt":0.2675287285451044,"score_spread":0.23909378057426517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1881465258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52680445,0.008949312,0.0027621177,0.17195672,0.00053777563,0.000048503956,0.000041661653,0.000043700195,0.28885585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99081975,0.0008756958,0.00031104122,0.004545301,0.00005813695,0.000012085846,0.000007914066,0.000006076878,0.0033640398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968284,0.00126392,0.00006224133,0.00029294862,0.00043220125,0.0011202656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964405,0.0012053472,0.00029736868,0.0002549712,0.0005418856,0.0012600191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037648538,0.00008928367,0.00021680104,0.0008780282,0.014049022,0.009690791,0.00081949856,0.0038226035,0.007778059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006680642,0.00024949192,0.00023037138,0.00092186476,0.010641436,0.0053767897,0.009719536,0.006263696,0.00021678163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034233784,0.000108822765,0.0053195367,0.00004051908,0.000010326519,0.0008861718,0.0433497,0.00020046363,0.00025828366,0.89917487,0.0068510915,0.043766093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005469597,0.00013213075,0.023317859,0.00087708107,0.00003831855,0.00065355125,0.15729085,0.0011807228,0.0007687276,0.27103087,0.54455316,0.000101965714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08407176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18056136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08407176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007940721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011294041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1671648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1885497808","doi":"10.3968/j.hess.1927024020140601.3971","title":"Measures of Travel Agencies’ Precaution Against Complaint","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Tourism; Business; Service (business); Marketing; Tourist industry; Advertising; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04049538569180496,"score_gpt":0.28393272976204165,"score_spread":0.24343734407023668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1885497808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8178916,0.0025126594,0.014134188,0.00803414,0.00042582184,0.0014672988,0.00130268,0.0005631467,0.1536685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98817015,0.0003582794,0.0060879705,0.00044290672,0.000064602384,0.00025153795,0.00029941372,0.00001714302,0.0043080724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97814995,0.008092123,0.00257753,0.00090891565,0.008726364,0.0015451367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9163002,0.01663624,0.03322381,0.006496496,0.02441832,0.002924847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010162796,0.00047005355,0.00040023413,0.0050336723,0.0023383996,0.002388628,0.0020636183,0.0013466156,0.0035561281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0723341,0.00024154237,0.0006707982,0.003989475,0.0016492453,0.0020756074,0.0024224562,0.0019909646,0.0008366725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003289846,0.0012704814,0.5739776,0.001376628,0.0005114903,0.000556435,0.027119288,0.0031874715,0.0029082329,0.019705433,0.021464998,0.34759298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031019757,0.001008052,0.8934515,0.00049802335,0.00015550255,0.00048000133,0.039687578,0.0030586442,0.0025373476,0.003891611,0.055059277,0.00014153133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011620133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012130667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011620133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029749053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005379682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05374664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1928315287","doi":"","title":"전자계약에 관한 국제협약 초안상의 계약법리에 관한 연구","year":2003,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"관세학회지","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; Ambiguity; Electronic data; Business; Electronic signature; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01651808470758496,"score_gpt":0.229115288710557,"score_spread":0.21259720400297205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1928315287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006961991,0.03739945,0.056481495,0.11080996,0.007971514,0.0005743004,0.0010418555,0.000722346,0.7780371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16855377,0.04249609,0.10899432,0.04503305,0.0039946223,0.0012864103,0.0036762808,0.0011143915,0.624851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95961654,0.0117008705,0.003503133,0.0029494753,0.019468404,0.0027616797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95442075,0.014827458,0.0026320813,0.005939247,0.020685822,0.0014946674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024648508,0.0009348258,0.00089262996,0.0070643,0.008236036,0.019437233,0.003000435,0.01116909,0.018911418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046863154,0.00082534796,0.00094629097,0.008035384,0.009838984,0.013746342,0.0059633045,0.0061120023,0.007357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026117697,0.000047165755,0.00069291785,0.00018959715,0.000007423162,0.00009232053,0.0011680808,0.00048876373,0.00032003722,0.70660114,0.2028711,0.08749529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049872697,0.000020619696,0.00065474823,0.00060957496,0.0000075580365,0.00010432026,0.0006723697,0.00041735306,0.0005467155,0.032024276,0.96489775,0.00003978844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052908536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034682017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052908536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013293162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019214781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1303553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1939343452","doi":"","title":"Introduction: Current Socio-Legal Perspectives on Dispute Resolution","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Legal research","score_opus":0.22772899441542213,"score_gpt":0.48734671177699285,"score_spread":0.2596177173615707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1939343452","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027874943,0.15144295,0.0056962254,0.43284005,0.0023691598,0.000023302491,0.00024209959,0.000028344733,0.37948292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7944771,0.13357031,0.0028357492,0.03889232,0.00846476,0.00008912998,0.00027873967,0.000053178057,0.0213387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99188554,0.0045290743,0.00036508724,0.0007092726,0.0019034266,0.00060752523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98131657,0.013162565,0.001914868,0.0007087928,0.0017317943,0.0011653904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073534627,0.00038438442,0.00043656715,0.0043759523,0.006716172,0.013010978,0.0024412517,0.006038798,0.016963048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010631746,0.00028256373,0.00045960004,0.007530687,0.030178573,0.014403732,0.0048727207,0.0054492154,0.002018914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013085196,0.00003678629,0.0014076226,0.00026342896,0.0000034043514,0.000092214046,0.027112816,0.00010266482,0.000025388408,0.9321301,0.017666845,0.021145623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008819204,0.00002246462,0.002588182,0.0011802124,0.0000040392165,0.0004120989,0.061115827,0.00022813783,0.000050536524,0.34285685,0.59151584,0.000016921822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049558193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033650163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016963048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066921604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032482708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05674702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1944759916","doi":"","title":"Crossborder Class Actions: A View from Across the Border","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Class (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Computer science; State (computer science); Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.021126629321548185,"score_gpt":0.2908879986024463,"score_spread":0.2697613692808981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1944759916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.269679,0.006027662,0.0248304,0.055637076,0.00038986382,0.00006135782,0.00011852548,0.000040120274,0.64321595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855428,0.0013074217,0.0006676198,0.0046978407,0.00020706723,0.000028926415,0.000021735059,0.000016286818,0.0075102863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996265,0.0010427084,0.00013480464,0.00074297213,0.00062667,0.0011878392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968041,0.0015126369,0.00058947795,0.0003875703,0.00036954047,0.00033666272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037165673,0.00027643293,0.0005822018,0.0017113195,0.009080607,0.01716212,0.0013918543,0.011093582,0.00925647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009687992,0.00036908596,0.0008482489,0.0013891661,0.015318571,0.010313171,0.007388518,0.010011807,0.00056417036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028480452,0.0000187222,0.0015498059,0.000020148378,0.000010877479,0.0004624856,0.0055417963,0.00036640966,0.0002926241,0.98454237,0.001399452,0.0057667866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007262873,0.00016813602,0.0075121257,0.00079185,0.0001401997,0.001112179,0.04093828,0.0027337798,0.002128051,0.7682399,0.17607331,0.00008963543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0132169565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012679889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01716212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004210221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002649814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030966043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966981078","doi":"10.1002/alt.20241","title":"California's supreme court first reasserts an arbitrator power…","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Mediation; Statute; Confidentiality; Power (physics); Subpoena; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02391639917174016,"score_gpt":0.24561896887713888,"score_spread":0.22170256970539873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966981078","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02545845,0.009832054,0.0011841105,0.51454264,0.0053804778,0.000036962592,0.00022953628,0.00010892699,0.44322687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5976298,0.0033755405,0.0014318593,0.14945862,0.0038428844,0.000056882065,0.00015843504,0.000105913554,0.24394013],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935343,0.001178161,0.00023702945,0.0009749248,0.002757113,0.0013185055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99007213,0.0053148777,0.00028731365,0.00063767977,0.002814054,0.0008739834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006169217,0.00024770075,0.00047313242,0.00083283737,0.01118938,0.012909269,0.0015098124,0.009548962,0.015316521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013053143,0.00050228694,0.00046330612,0.0006555623,0.0077473726,0.0031330257,0.0026974806,0.01127076,0.0014303392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006017353,0.000023303002,0.0012848018,0.000069719026,0.000021207468,0.0005328352,0.0027448863,0.0001667338,0.0003347231,0.44124255,0.54039925,0.013119777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037327438,0.000027102291,0.0019048033,0.00029217597,0.000035495472,0.00012021151,0.0025627764,0.0002274176,0.00053843216,0.029235983,0.96497023,0.000047862322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13205434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24153669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13205434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009089185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010048416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2625714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973438824","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2013.42.3.0255","title":"An Empirical Analysis of Appeals by Class Members in Australia's Federal Class Actions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Class action; Supreme court; Class (philosophy); Political science; Law; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.06604056206683592,"score_gpt":0.3625630145899187,"score_spread":0.29652245252308274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973438824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99208826,0.00007688491,0.000065173575,0.00047317104,0.000005916623,0.0000358996,0.0000351052,0.0000016088072,0.007217966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971181,0.00009715742,0.00003743156,0.00011841644,0.000013974845,0.00002486268,0.000035623285,0.0000014430553,0.002552931],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925262,0.002426287,0.00036418746,0.0004809971,0.0023031838,0.0018991185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9367233,0.032493737,0.018599657,0.0013169693,0.0053383107,0.005528032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061008655,0.00013713243,0.0004079385,0.002535724,0.0043756883,0.003218824,0.0012917055,0.0014852845,0.0061775167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05164397,0.0002759897,0.00028091876,0.0027403906,0.003278525,0.002214836,0.002434902,0.0039176173,0.0007664871],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003040408,0.0019166332,0.7997002,0.0001049474,0.00007755203,0.0010790917,0.13826998,0.0004717182,0.0005558745,0.025598139,0.0060062767,0.025915537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012232762,0.00016048492,0.9447038,0.00005476741,0.000023322387,0.00012502955,0.048589148,0.00074484275,0.00012022792,0.0006470689,0.0048010084,0.000018078123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13448647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16370492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13448647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063004075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039554564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26740736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984946490","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2013.0002","title":"Can Class Action Regimes Operate Satisfactorily without a Certification Device? Empirical Insights from the Federal Court of Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Certification; Supreme court; Class (philosophy); Empirical research; Political science; Law; Action (physics); Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.11353519014166352,"score_gpt":0.34800423563009053,"score_spread":0.234469045488427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984946490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8431312,0.0011663388,0.0014942032,0.008726723,0.000028378448,0.000100722275,0.00007640269,0.000010818662,0.14526528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975368,0.0002784134,0.00019766336,0.00043035034,0.000021232237,0.000016958063,0.000018873197,0.000002613021,0.0014970249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768425,0.006894865,0.0014970051,0.0021587692,0.008024672,0.0045821816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.903885,0.055290077,0.02369091,0.0058228076,0.008842137,0.0024691273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01865727,0.00017949527,0.00070936175,0.0030519888,0.0058700475,0.009062639,0.0019627083,0.0036762813,0.005006919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09369429,0.00055895286,0.00056188216,0.0031458791,0.0140095735,0.009442465,0.003863294,0.0043279356,0.00053003896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089120804,0.0003741649,0.09613862,0.0001981163,0.00007958108,0.00071740453,0.041235186,0.001725211,0.00036165802,0.82894367,0.00356856,0.02656884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019789593,0.00036620424,0.6082365,0.0011638945,0.00038939549,0.0007135701,0.068300605,0.010643247,0.0011960979,0.2456653,0.06292904,0.00019815618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15628569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16702664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15628569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011322003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012370634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31075203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986313535","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1164","title":"USA-Canada Class Actions: Trading in Procedural Fairness","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Notice; Res judicata; Class (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Political science; Settlement (finance); Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Law and economics; Action (physics); Legislature; Law; Business; Economics; Geography; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.01334012087626161,"score_gpt":0.255825465341427,"score_spread":0.24248534446516543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986313535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05277622,0.0032699388,0.018056285,0.05513897,0.0004481194,0.00009352556,0.00012807896,0.00006785001,0.8700209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9099345,0.0011052935,0.006134292,0.012826368,0.00012970684,0.00007929537,0.000042889467,0.000033359567,0.06971433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98704344,0.0027262664,0.00031541375,0.0011365258,0.0056475904,0.0031306827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99509156,0.002278431,0.00036210963,0.0004982817,0.001297483,0.00047210255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006558431,0.000374444,0.00039299447,0.0010745022,0.016373271,0.011080753,0.0015190591,0.007359737,0.0056782505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013130561,0.00026899838,0.0005456221,0.0018977752,0.017546814,0.0031457355,0.004365664,0.0056523294,0.00037808245],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007957678,0.0000050851913,0.00060443865,0.000008175177,0.000004123856,0.000039796018,0.0018946079,0.00018343757,0.00006659825,0.98859733,0.0036811987,0.0049073077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049451854,0.000044738787,0.0091504315,0.00024648692,0.00008651007,0.00025560564,0.007846437,0.0031697922,0.001190103,0.5483896,0.4294553,0.0001155925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8774546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9397768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12254542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044271052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.072926186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32121044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001310812","doi":"10.7202/1002368ar","title":"The Judicial System in the Digital Age: Revisiting the Relationship between Privacy and Accessibility in the Cyber Context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Transparency (behavior); Openness to experience; Information privacy; Context (archaeology); Political science; Internet privacy; Copying; Privacy law; Privacy by Design; Law; Privacy policy; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0929479725175142,"score_gpt":0.2803846439826713,"score_spread":0.18743667146515713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001310812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4081103,0.013654961,0.026403673,0.08557349,0.0005497798,0.0000880691,0.00008108951,0.000039644252,0.465499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943948,0.0016815373,0.00085016596,0.0012844243,0.00016285603,0.00001748878,0.0000058124706,0.000009087937,0.0015938333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98771775,0.008469859,0.00040702787,0.0007140994,0.0015359818,0.0011552077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9588962,0.03324865,0.0032409457,0.0020484081,0.0016754166,0.0008903723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008232546,0.00024536037,0.00036525037,0.0025277224,0.009260183,0.017363433,0.0014515228,0.0040494525,0.0065874816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023945736,0.0003890082,0.0005772427,0.0021471698,0.054102656,0.02473981,0.01095037,0.0051421574,0.00038055182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018617093,0.000039008602,0.0020100316,0.00005557083,0.0000056519275,0.0003018547,0.024837987,0.00035168667,0.000105521794,0.96517235,0.0005636574,0.0065380507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004365957,0.00008894744,0.007859959,0.0006279577,0.0000447234,0.0008337494,0.06791591,0.0020125986,0.00068671437,0.84384596,0.07598661,0.00005324374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006804093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006231014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017363433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005360117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004058898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04353839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004291310","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2009.00227.x","title":"What Difference Does a Robe Make? Comparing Mediators with and without Prior Judicial Experience","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Process (computing); Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.014523573598143475,"score_gpt":0.24528401628998542,"score_spread":0.23076044269184195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004291310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943515,0.0004776798,0.00015619684,0.00071833417,0.000044577653,0.000024934308,0.000016318825,0.000004265464,0.0042062486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99944085,0.00013650223,0.000046807698,0.000054786087,0.000019786328,0.000009978953,0.000010815845,0.0000019479153,0.00027843562],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98606944,0.008345245,0.0008939546,0.0006937454,0.002292285,0.0017052981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9238674,0.04916984,0.014031355,0.0026520344,0.0037771256,0.0065022735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013787205,0.00030375028,0.0009551926,0.0024511141,0.0020260573,0.006695651,0.0011982323,0.0020489115,0.008441834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11762993,0.00028406395,0.00059109903,0.00092046265,0.0028705935,0.0035728642,0.002833993,0.0017301637,0.0007797319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034807068,0.003299464,0.82842433,0.0003945333,0.0005493336,0.0046227365,0.08242743,0.00054447405,0.0036692696,0.007066264,0.0013843453,0.064137176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025900063,0.0029760953,0.6103973,0.0006919209,0.00040682143,0.003554712,0.3541508,0.0017443615,0.002979027,0.009418098,0.013224698,0.00019718787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016669822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002211077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013787205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009953134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012412848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0729146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044536498","doi":"10.1177/193229681300700206","title":"As the Pendulum Swings—Medical Products Class Actions Litigation in Canada: Recent Developments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Certification; Plaintiff; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Law; Business; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01194235421291979,"score_gpt":0.21585811062087323,"score_spread":0.20391575640795345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044536498","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048742693,0.18263638,0.002423985,0.55722725,0.0035917982,0.000164811,0.0006123682,0.00020257625,0.20439814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59759575,0.1885647,0.0052203513,0.14816591,0.0025964302,0.00008199116,0.0006866372,0.0001242112,0.05696406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863521,0.00078258885,0.00045962937,0.0010703854,0.008607464,0.0027277418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9667301,0.0084030535,0.0029717928,0.0004398577,0.013879029,0.00757615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008120352,0.00045931007,0.0006345922,0.0048831324,0.016566433,0.018052863,0.00420205,0.008575422,0.007813973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021210713,0.0007079381,0.0008234262,0.007295736,0.012849254,0.004662303,0.0033316019,0.009428154,0.0004977723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013740029,0.00027655932,0.015257869,0.0012146663,0.00006629326,0.0014243319,0.006695376,0.0014183488,0.0008312046,0.4135413,0.21962602,0.33951065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006271687,0.00011747229,0.04957378,0.0020940932,0.000105254294,0.00069470354,0.0079638995,0.0015030209,0.0006461574,0.017302709,0.9196568,0.00027940044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98822093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2071004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2071004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34349674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91965115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054660371","doi":"10.1002/alt.20149","title":"The protections and limits of confidentiality in mediation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Miller Group (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Mediation; Privilege (computing); Coercion (linguistics); Settlement (finance); Law; Political science; Business; Internet privacy; Criminology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014127910206114518,"score_gpt":0.2502102383507433,"score_spread":0.2360823281446288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054660371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06962024,0.02964878,0.082266845,0.15184768,0.0010948244,0.00024480352,0.00022460193,0.00010735763,0.6649449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725161,0.0055474997,0.0075336886,0.0048034457,0.0013260677,0.0004117122,0.000041889343,0.000043959983,0.007775769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9103763,0.051558014,0.0052427636,0.0051586283,0.021623604,0.00604077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8613092,0.09827258,0.007716793,0.021814516,0.007853468,0.0030333695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059593838,0.00055799336,0.0013298569,0.0023514582,0.010747176,0.02514198,0.0032321173,0.010607557,0.0048029125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.094069205,0.0014149952,0.0012011708,0.0020080819,0.08623243,0.02681844,0.01977045,0.014333426,0.00096221484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014930687,0.0000069827793,0.00024025865,0.00003074416,0.0000059956465,0.00007189731,0.0020522843,0.00018049264,0.000069957074,0.99361765,0.0006584629,0.0030503687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017487604,0.000016672853,0.00028231126,0.00032032185,0.000012536145,0.00024499223,0.0012682527,0.00036251367,0.00027314603,0.9744135,0.022762902,0.00002527338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051918477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002492832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059593838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072282245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009850838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31516612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069817349","doi":"","title":"Hoffman v. Monsanto: Courts, Class Actions, and Perceptions of the Problem of GM Drift","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Harm; Denial; Law and economics; Compensation (psychology); Civil procedure; Class (philosophy); Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Collective action; Mass tort; Business; Economics; Tort; Social psychology; Liability; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.007205334129437379,"score_gpt":0.2334734353483459,"score_spread":0.2262681012189085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069817349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49187538,0.0043806513,0.0023031107,0.28935036,0.00035579578,0.00006949398,0.000035526835,0.00003389209,0.21159582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825204,0.000497251,0.00020618294,0.013240075,0.00011136959,0.000013620864,0.0000049261266,0.000008011089,0.003398165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885407,0.0044672275,0.00032138987,0.00071023265,0.003943217,0.0020172533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97890955,0.015546163,0.002581087,0.00041070764,0.0013092124,0.0012433028],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0109535465,0.00018535118,0.00032030558,0.0014440268,0.014924019,0.013210515,0.0012828405,0.00840689,0.0037362985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026791554,0.00027998825,0.0003478843,0.001433528,0.023522029,0.0060148714,0.0046632634,0.008952581,0.00013676027],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050453793,0.000084632586,0.009803457,0.000061943625,0.000013755939,0.0012935981,0.15337667,0.00021604229,0.0009141383,0.79762125,0.016244568,0.020319486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010266274,0.00018371953,0.035360932,0.00081477803,0.000059344315,0.0012829937,0.40874022,0.0015267868,0.0012232782,0.268926,0.28151774,0.00026156087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08476482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07973138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011257451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010469234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16854292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085269292","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2002.tb00249.x","title":"Supporting Accountability in the Field of Mediation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Mediation; Field (mathematics); Comprehension; Work (physics); Public relations; Interpersonal communication; Psychology; Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Social psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.02205254047965057,"score_gpt":0.29281674696918636,"score_spread":0.2707642064895358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085269292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098794915,0.0016284547,0.121930845,0.29821232,0.0031391426,0.00043154345,0.000082592596,0.0008972873,0.47488284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98067045,0.0002733747,0.0093908375,0.0040207785,0.0005483115,0.00017707993,0.000016907135,0.0000672648,0.0048351004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.80596507,0.15273821,0.0054987776,0.0054518296,0.017476112,0.012870036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44128487,0.42571905,0.033294633,0.030122094,0.048559006,0.021020336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1537288,0.00070749235,0.0008264868,0.0050291414,0.024767855,0.024704132,0.0031495912,0.007919492,0.007888334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32121986,0.0007520531,0.00076884805,0.0025213857,0.038591936,0.024026785,0.021717105,0.011452661,0.0014723163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014497369,0.00033374157,0.01698671,0.00033052472,0.000048965194,0.00091588637,0.06835418,0.0018082819,0.0009286501,0.7685917,0.024790963,0.11676543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016791825,0.0002554148,0.0068011596,0.0011110522,0.000072281444,0.00033145494,0.03720739,0.006153484,0.003159166,0.785167,0.15938976,0.00018389699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007249567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006139416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1537288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010861458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05124304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8130053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086930835","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2005.34.3.201","title":"Contingency Fee Agreements with Represented Persons in Class Actions—An Undesirable Australian Phenomenon","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Contingency; Statute; Law; Political science; Class (philosophy); Legislature; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Commission; Business","score_opus":0.07017741307805546,"score_gpt":0.31321063370859503,"score_spread":0.24303322063053956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086930835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38655102,0.013584387,0.012729188,0.02971007,0.00044311536,0.00022789357,0.00011149201,0.0000795255,0.55656326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961103,0.0034448595,0.0019319173,0.0038450733,0.00013316107,0.00007174656,0.00003040224,0.0000151935765,0.029424692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752661,0.0080149425,0.0011677431,0.0018117676,0.011226709,0.002512736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966841,0.018325731,0.0065745297,0.0026323637,0.004584536,0.0010417914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0152647775,0.00013134327,0.00036339255,0.0030355803,0.009461246,0.0072355825,0.0015949483,0.0036794334,0.003166581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034585614,0.00049500604,0.00035452234,0.0044178353,0.009760818,0.0039358614,0.00489354,0.0045752646,0.00038239287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019364445,0.000050683706,0.0076875165,0.00018063831,0.000022306202,0.0007920656,0.04085752,0.00022608468,0.0006552313,0.88020897,0.011254908,0.05804462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028945215,0.00013279685,0.0917369,0.00089154945,0.00009535371,0.0017413442,0.032982454,0.0011666736,0.002244279,0.113659814,0.75519395,0.00012600068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094018824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16920327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094018824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008392195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012946301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18694311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089099854","doi":"10.3390/laws3040636","title":"Does Avoiding Judicial Isolation Outweigh the Risks Related to “Professional Death by Facebook”?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Internet Registration Authority","keywords":"Scrutiny; Order (exchange); Economic Justice; Normative; Public relations; Internet privacy; Perspective (graphical); Social media; Realm; Political science; Psychology; Law; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.020739412916654633,"score_gpt":0.2722563188444416,"score_spread":0.25151690592778697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089099854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26339257,0.003679084,0.013967533,0.33330783,0.0019338493,0.00012646115,0.00010347705,0.0001513217,0.38333791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97458017,0.0007512044,0.0016088295,0.015082245,0.0005614561,0.000072677176,0.000020434307,0.000039628318,0.007283257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766649,0.012182768,0.0007827324,0.0018612725,0.0044044256,0.004103867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9444145,0.028868392,0.0097164465,0.0058939527,0.005047494,0.0060590836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022939965,0.0002959636,0.00048277498,0.0012683928,0.011713074,0.013045302,0.002022751,0.0063057444,0.012109293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10654956,0.00032613217,0.0005615063,0.0007281285,0.017262448,0.01684804,0.0067958455,0.005726732,0.0019516188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018621783,0.00034320148,0.055801578,0.0004386534,0.00008497361,0.0009274796,0.096818484,0.00032074732,0.0011461399,0.59638524,0.05625557,0.19129173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008349264,0.00046250538,0.07569235,0.003390222,0.00018273761,0.002127192,0.23905702,0.0017834958,0.0043729874,0.33911425,0.33352613,0.00020771062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007459493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020100752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022939965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025622463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071748737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12131959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091510336","doi":"10.1007/s10726-007-9085-7","title":"Antecedents of attitude towards online mediation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Structural equation modeling; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Social psychology; Variance (accounting); Phenomenon; Attribution; Service (business); Business; Marketing; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.018825522037906394,"score_gpt":0.2787451963492249,"score_spread":0.2599196743113185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091510336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99035054,0.00008370805,0.00014501462,0.00050176715,0.00002150305,0.00001981513,0.000038506678,0.0000040846166,0.0088350745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989215,0.00006652442,0.00011989559,0.000082353305,0.000020165848,0.000010324775,0.000031452455,0.0000029998248,0.0007448982],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977182,0.0011600124,0.0001699806,0.00015201811,0.00046322393,0.0003365236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9177687,0.04943361,0.016794201,0.0031225176,0.004007217,0.0088736275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033690198,0.0002184944,0.00021780924,0.001398906,0.0014103894,0.0032620123,0.0004912337,0.0017645034,0.013336733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02531558,0.0003082881,0.00036792085,0.0011367119,0.001505218,0.0009229084,0.0007383065,0.002472047,0.00093857246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050069165,0.0022573615,0.98324734,0.000044282002,0.00009049868,0.0003771498,0.004544765,0.00023738993,0.0007793912,0.0015397097,0.00041355647,0.005967957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006012929,0.00029316318,0.9804906,0.00005304099,0.00009111266,0.00041775947,0.013704543,0.0012527383,0.0004599638,0.0018214134,0.001333975,0.00002163061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043664556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060431496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013336733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007605434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007968256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044615865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098660069","doi":"10.1093/iclq/53.3.579","title":"CANADIAN REFLECTIONS ON THE TOBACCO WARS: SOME UNINTENDED CONSEQUE5NCES OF MASS TORT LITIGATION","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Mass tort; Legislation; Tort; Legislature; Political science; Commonwealth; Law; Tort reform; Unintended consequences; Jurisprudence; Harm; Economic Justice; Action (physics); Law and economics; State (computer science); Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.06344834934063906,"score_gpt":0.2925820214590201,"score_spread":0.22913367211838107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098660069","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013701204,0.03382903,0.0002492268,0.7118541,0.0026116066,0.00003658538,0.00056352175,0.000045043937,0.2371097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40314084,0.061397336,0.0011229127,0.3639295,0.0028275964,0.000052077736,0.00036753408,0.00019990545,0.16696236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884729,0.001452631,0.0003246014,0.0010000449,0.005074113,0.0036757365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897481,0.0034708865,0.00064427074,0.00031983628,0.003916652,0.001900104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008302572,0.0007583354,0.0008366693,0.0042355517,0.042314146,0.021569539,0.004274296,0.01794372,0.02595599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017782954,0.0007789804,0.00092874974,0.009884111,0.0250065,0.009504261,0.0057731476,0.016854092,0.001779273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097306074,0.000041600608,0.0017538661,0.00028919673,0.00002248739,0.00116503,0.032991827,0.00024355177,0.00036895796,0.47621435,0.45332238,0.033489455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025741892,0.000015432524,0.0034132355,0.0003473845,0.000018623223,0.00021303802,0.025342586,0.000087401524,0.00023664355,0.019342957,0.95086616,0.00009080351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98880845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20787138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20787138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18894783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9187569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098915596","doi":"10.1504/ijplap.2011.042620","title":"Facebook v. the Florida Bar","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Law and Policy","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"St. Thomas University","keywords":"Bar (unit); The Internet; Internet privacy; Politics; First amendment; Political science; Process (computing); Expression (computer science); Advertising; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04918048309528059,"score_gpt":0.2717121016196092,"score_spread":0.2225316185243286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098915596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062497813,0.0026030138,0.0012258792,0.18269177,0.0028494596,0.0001423012,0.00043649232,0.00021011368,0.7473432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40462628,0.0010843095,0.00063244166,0.119772255,0.0012292468,0.00029072512,0.00017427636,0.000051172377,0.47213933],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998511,0.0002709899,0.00003062504,0.00019239385,0.00040477637,0.00059013837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849474,0.0007154812,0.00010741488,0.0000635677,0.00033132467,0.00028745466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016174266,0.00045288858,0.00016886984,0.0010303938,0.011851636,0.005022927,0.0007045698,0.0076912823,0.025883593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004321661,0.00033734945,0.00038414117,0.00036965485,0.0018031647,0.0034272613,0.0021821058,0.0041185003,0.0034008955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014177625,0.00009378876,0.005142907,0.00010793537,0.000017937851,0.0010716647,0.005250301,0.00012378322,0.0019189894,0.33139127,0.5818093,0.072930366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003205296,0.000097627584,0.007290863,0.00022915249,0.00003296963,0.00027028122,0.002639799,0.00035566816,0.0015135796,0.0065393937,0.98093307,0.000065517124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10648528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17830609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10648528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043055774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043174047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21173096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107598956","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2154220","title":"Should Family Disputes Be Arbitrated?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.03006524766995438,"score_gpt":0.25490976712022745,"score_spread":0.22484451945027306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107598956","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101702586,0.0074661616,0.007975576,0.54004586,0.0030583527,0.00007315053,0.00015322944,0.00005283059,0.33947223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456285,0.0018552593,0.0012717457,0.02469804,0.0016746835,0.000071911076,0.00004401948,0.000029834851,0.024726031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917251,0.0038685172,0.0003174906,0.00064212346,0.0009242205,0.0025224455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97228503,0.017134055,0.0028242075,0.0021446585,0.0028898832,0.0027222685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021511806,0.00028289825,0.0005986297,0.0012046179,0.00634749,0.006163551,0.0022846817,0.020130247,0.02720443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11423922,0.00036703577,0.0005669168,0.001186524,0.007931475,0.012198022,0.002646479,0.00745295,0.0025434557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002446014,0.00016456879,0.008790561,0.000071871815,0.000049867213,0.0011489927,0.009230532,0.00029851298,0.00012794246,0.85361797,0.067188494,0.05906616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015084466,0.00008409713,0.00811316,0.00065375754,0.000048311766,0.0013813425,0.017428532,0.0010063924,0.00038146038,0.7599936,0.21070379,0.000054727643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012431826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012630858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02720443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003048829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067034885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11376667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114672316","doi":"10.82308/20900","title":"Fairness in class action settlements","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"St. Jude Medical; Northwest Airlines","keywords":"Class action; Settlement (finance); Human settlement; Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Political science; Class (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Engineering; Geography; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.052521995089979456,"score_gpt":0.24441199024920426,"score_spread":0.1918899951592248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114672316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0696366,0.0014626272,0.20977938,0.013004175,0.0009412071,0.0006710883,0.00038165424,0.00055875775,0.7035646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8564253,0.00048424394,0.027175287,0.0011204504,0.00047984708,0.0006708936,0.0001816969,0.00019888644,0.11326341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9727322,0.012117927,0.001530985,0.0044627856,0.0053036734,0.0038523236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9739048,0.012806199,0.0020866594,0.0058246693,0.0038510724,0.001526666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028328435,0.0007978471,0.0014325851,0.002138252,0.008946999,0.009239593,0.0028270641,0.0051041045,0.04942025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061131205,0.00057183404,0.0014318519,0.0019011219,0.009323137,0.009892005,0.008658045,0.0041237646,0.0047581797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047654852,0.000022440981,0.00058024714,0.000028264092,0.000008899886,0.000049463073,0.00090191176,0.00094362465,0.00007782621,0.98282164,0.0025063474,0.012011559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006394737,0.000035691188,0.0006038895,0.00008731071,0.000017801764,0.00004487004,0.0006564918,0.004171755,0.0002536293,0.9591897,0.034856517,0.000018400953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008939721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074267555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04942025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006981123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00851894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16532719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120272835","doi":"","title":"Replacing Inadequate Class Representatives in Federal Class Actions: Quo Vadis?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Supreme court; Class (philosophy); Political science; Redress; Law; Civil procedure; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.03805700763069122,"score_gpt":0.29116472290773904,"score_spread":0.25310771527704784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120272835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58383965,0.008425723,0.02406702,0.13748367,0.00091885024,0.00027789958,0.00018330943,0.000118101016,0.24468578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835074,0.0006316801,0.0017202791,0.006924043,0.00009238719,0.000064311345,0.000016011565,0.000011812777,0.007032108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96565276,0.018136585,0.0012532605,0.0024205185,0.0076044626,0.0049324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95384705,0.02747024,0.007756329,0.005901354,0.00435212,0.00067281077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03652805,0.00017475066,0.000448278,0.0013695452,0.011018677,0.010248427,0.0024579545,0.0071524503,0.002636818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08245095,0.00040942107,0.0004928387,0.0017527204,0.019168718,0.011258114,0.0047480897,0.007143519,0.0003649992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051423587,0.000043260072,0.007970268,0.0001422902,0.000020354613,0.00021313019,0.08985953,0.0001797854,0.00044841945,0.8350886,0.008185398,0.05779751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059208898,0.00033678525,0.06270655,0.0014572432,0.00022406458,0.0006335804,0.1409386,0.0014900093,0.005708679,0.18377672,0.60247916,0.00018938554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06637476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10666775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06637476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013320421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012647319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1931811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W212664854","doi":"","title":"International Class Actions in the Canadian Context: Standing, Funding, Enforceability and Trial","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Liability; Law; Class (philosophy); Settlement (finance); Action (physics); Political science; Res judicata; Business; Multinational corporation; Law and economics; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.05975093314548166,"score_gpt":0.29075638991564995,"score_spread":0.2310054567701683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W212664854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04932376,0.013555406,0.0030231422,0.30580664,0.0017148185,0.00025836896,0.00056767795,0.0001464407,0.62560374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72625977,0.011744533,0.0037881494,0.07243336,0.00076281506,0.00017015723,0.00032204317,0.00011668943,0.18440253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98354244,0.0011717457,0.0003488831,0.0013492454,0.0057285978,0.007859084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98528177,0.0037668713,0.0009959242,0.0004681884,0.004143298,0.0053439685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072191525,0.00050718774,0.0004978931,0.002276922,0.029891126,0.024519889,0.0043240804,0.012472503,0.020851742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02508426,0.00058576517,0.00057079754,0.0029618558,0.0149324825,0.0051093935,0.0049631563,0.00959912,0.0011400844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046906887,0.00005337918,0.0056533534,0.00017881091,0.000017351163,0.0007374059,0.006801715,0.00063370966,0.0003743406,0.7681642,0.17166986,0.045668915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035425317,0.000058481663,0.016591398,0.0010294933,0.00007627934,0.00039847405,0.02200735,0.0012192072,0.00072928035,0.04435845,0.9133075,0.0001886368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9853216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99310315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1671706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1671706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37314612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9659641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126997884","doi":"10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020110703.100","title":"The Revelation of Administrative Case System in Taiwan to the Transformation of Administrative Case Guidance System in Mainland China","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainland China; Political science; China; China mainland; Humanities; Revelation; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06941208281526139,"score_gpt":0.3374247432158517,"score_spread":0.2680126604005903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126997884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8969916,0.00045599186,0.007830727,0.0072691515,0.00008950705,0.0001809165,0.00018111726,0.00007935967,0.08692163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99154484,0.000120335346,0.001538224,0.00018292219,0.000015826223,0.000046074532,0.00008519044,0.000007657618,0.006459043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981711,0.0006151162,0.00014044711,0.00031441523,0.0003988383,0.00036009983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963736,0.00079216197,0.0006425587,0.0006298463,0.0011063543,0.00045532695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023133273,0.00013799212,0.00012799562,0.001938789,0.0023528612,0.0032631627,0.00065333594,0.000586088,0.005731518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006316136,0.00016601219,0.0004096309,0.0024016097,0.0052325483,0.0022418161,0.0021026453,0.001117196,0.0002516408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009772589,0.00010730071,0.16298784,0.00013995332,0.000043498563,0.0024273575,0.04741872,0.002803842,0.0032532813,0.66662544,0.009397863,0.10469719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008395908,0.00029554527,0.5928334,0.00030000656,0.000075942844,0.0013329397,0.058179192,0.017847015,0.0041759554,0.10957366,0.21515429,0.00014810369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045875844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037205994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045875844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068625207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007813808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127043129","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720120802.2011","title":"A Rational Thinking of the People’s Mediation System of China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Political science; Social harmony; China; Humanities; Harmony (color); Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Social science","score_opus":0.009535233055668025,"score_gpt":0.2134191263422014,"score_spread":0.20388389328653336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127043129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1873648,0.0023701317,0.1690447,0.047578856,0.00038412723,0.00076894753,0.00029909558,0.00019592974,0.59199333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95736784,0.00064498564,0.022947982,0.0009339038,0.000068879635,0.0002022918,0.000078719975,0.000020313071,0.017735021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970951,0.0013486043,0.00013830003,0.0005197984,0.000530469,0.00036770647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991715,0.00023902788,0.00011126244,0.00013033625,0.00024418294,0.00010375539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004230336,0.0006312561,0.00030753337,0.0020112712,0.0040694186,0.005207105,0.0016027999,0.00209618,0.00607864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025815351,0.0002483823,0.0010226541,0.0010871724,0.017346535,0.005202498,0.0021664267,0.0016669775,0.00050792453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049573364,0.000007032933,0.0005186909,0.000019651967,0.000008025185,0.000100968195,0.003313772,0.0014738899,0.0001315927,0.9915176,0.00082434685,0.002079389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060206057,0.000043140735,0.002166252,0.000106486965,0.000038267877,0.00012884592,0.0047889054,0.017192163,0.0005110068,0.93078846,0.044122647,0.000053657317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04298719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017344957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04298719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012502685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010823384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09071374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129017052","doi":"10.3390/laws3010106","title":"Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) within Developing Nations: A Qualitative Evaluation of Transfer and Impact","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Developing country; Agency (philosophy); Public relations; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.07268586706380831,"score_gpt":0.3638266194231166,"score_spread":0.2911407523593083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129017052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838824,0.00033144647,0.0011948961,0.0013048096,0.00003328664,0.0012046658,0.00011638939,0.000012587316,0.011919506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930815,0.0005431711,0.0021683993,0.00052944006,0.000012190663,0.001628431,0.00006807893,0.00001759515,0.0019511705],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9288605,0.06271418,0.0015374674,0.0011873338,0.0027589928,0.002941496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8391641,0.1360353,0.0071348217,0.004043087,0.00842017,0.0052025826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0997831,0.00043464167,0.0009286109,0.0027673878,0.01145143,0.005973364,0.0026187357,0.001645148,0.0057396274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09462213,0.0006508615,0.00040662984,0.0035324066,0.014479043,0.005955889,0.0115304645,0.003175133,0.00038180512],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009000498,0.00053552596,0.005138307,0.00037488632,0.000006051625,0.0003383326,0.972801,0.000065912944,0.0002981535,0.0022031295,0.00044726138,0.01770148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027080676,0.00022309028,0.0037600882,0.0002885546,0.0000057024026,0.00007732561,0.9880586,0.0001370792,0.0002827167,0.00040823914,0.0067184223,0.000013035388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009117001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014641245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0997831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01127936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012566505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5277098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137409652","doi":"","title":"Additional Compensation to Representative Plaintiffs in Ontario: Conceptual, Empirical and Comparative Perspectives","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Plaintiff; Milestone; Economic Justice; Commission; Empirical research; Political science; Law and economics; Situated; Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Compensation (psychology); Jurisprudence; Law; Sociology; Business; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Epistemology; Geography","score_opus":0.041672967724941036,"score_gpt":0.2888849815970956,"score_spread":0.24721201387215455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137409652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6454439,0.005464427,0.0009379163,0.034098532,0.00015735337,0.00017907158,0.00042395855,0.000017667424,0.31327713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821405,0.0017308821,0.0002755127,0.0010291898,0.00004388702,0.000038669146,0.00008455395,0.000004916798,0.014652051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99148625,0.0012201979,0.000226302,0.0004676912,0.0031549006,0.003444655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901945,0.0032296446,0.0016256787,0.0004509291,0.0030134504,0.0014857753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00623156,0.000257864,0.00062376447,0.0035403986,0.01926166,0.0075870687,0.0026302827,0.0031679072,0.0072653363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01528834,0.0003561351,0.00042967105,0.0060007367,0.015024611,0.002625778,0.0038602948,0.0018870706,0.00025979205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025003927,0.00014495602,0.10428923,0.00041906774,0.000071460956,0.0016966102,0.17446192,0.00093942037,0.00077056047,0.6620932,0.019021235,0.035842236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010680644,0.00014335717,0.3960649,0.000990693,0.00021600857,0.00046829923,0.3032325,0.001729239,0.0007521378,0.031794384,0.2643393,0.00016229166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97599834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99201363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1625326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1625326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.110597454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97134346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144353970","doi":"10.2105/ajph.2014.302040","title":"Estimating the Proportion of Cases of Lung Cancer Legally Attributable to Smoking: A Novel Approach for Class Actions Against the Tobacco Industry","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Public Health","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Lung cancer; Medicine; Tobacco industry; Plaintiff; Environmental health; Cigarette smoking; Disease; Demography; Law; Pathology; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.08657632060352975,"score_gpt":0.3437355660831894,"score_spread":0.2571592454796596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144353970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55131656,0.00096185185,0.43499017,0.0018488172,0.0000534128,0.0018617866,0.0018643744,0.0001917797,0.0069112205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9061567,0.00018221106,0.091770984,0.00017846846,0.000036645986,0.000429691,0.0004289111,0.000007873007,0.0008084847],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815336,0.012325037,0.0009125366,0.002461716,0.0023242845,0.00044292383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9410369,0.045033105,0.008568845,0.0026797913,0.0022455356,0.00043577317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027195977,0.00075438264,0.00079062884,0.0048257215,0.0009873332,0.0017397047,0.001977042,0.0012270211,0.001935659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087901056,0.00038426678,0.0013775274,0.0022190677,0.0013596299,0.0012341059,0.0019019508,0.0014081657,0.00019444514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025554962,0.00030416428,0.7908998,0.0002556569,0.0018390467,0.0004250033,0.0012526328,0.06875923,0.0013527949,0.013754061,0.0018060512,0.11909602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022482172,0.00059502333,0.39321312,0.00026371673,0.0006684912,0.00089972484,0.0018456499,0.572277,0.0034144854,0.018058436,0.008391666,0.0001479561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14521903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13069578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14521903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00496007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003536113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2887475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150371631","doi":"","title":"3680 Banff Court, North Vancouver, BC","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.029871216011848934,"score_gpt":0.20201279552396736,"score_spread":0.17214157951211842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150371631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021240534,0.00214124,0.0004517691,0.0029579734,0.00077422144,0.00017217666,0.0030521255,0.00015534052,0.96905476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011924143,0.0004105888,0.00020064609,0.00029645764,0.000018366363,0.000020787931,0.00034282153,0.00006244911,0.9867237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989548,0.000099627636,0.000045807847,0.00020853485,0.00039759872,0.0002935343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979412,0.0002768357,0.000040764164,0.00007415587,0.0013100252,0.00035700543],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004988765,0.00073283294,0.00051156356,0.001702819,0.019353237,0.004454954,0.0015970104,0.0031747387,0.45819598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002524997,0.00084937474,0.00042407957,0.0021121737,0.00091786426,0.00087822066,0.0014129182,0.003798488,0.07809083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003983772,0.00024365808,0.008288962,0.00034578654,0.00006309672,0.001668575,0.0011408029,0.00094188034,0.0021368107,0.021058727,0.8073044,0.15640897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005721058,0.00006508529,0.02512433,0.0003061539,0.00002583138,0.00029060218,0.0030316755,0.0007540869,0.00096206326,0.0016944421,0.96764517,0.000043385266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7448036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.965867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.541804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012854147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012588926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7728177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2186614908","doi":"","title":"Saskatchewan The Class Actions Act","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02382941476035606,"score_gpt":0.2408809970475123,"score_spread":0.21705158228715626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2186614908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012758874,0.0025370794,0.0009243322,0.017272603,0.0010299659,0.0002625831,0.0075327912,0.00016997755,0.95751184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0423103,0.0015135414,0.00087064866,0.008320605,0.000069555805,0.0003658129,0.0020689592,0.000056564542,0.944424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706906,0.00036944397,0.0001729388,0.00033882514,0.0010699207,0.0009798079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952674,0.0014476372,0.00028600686,0.00082751416,0.0015520685,0.0006193517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023283307,0.00082046393,0.00068108476,0.0018603817,0.007765161,0.01026556,0.0016808178,0.0055339285,0.073516786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008426306,0.0011188313,0.00074053666,0.0028270064,0.0029291261,0.002237443,0.0034619097,0.0065342546,0.017366784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018734552,0.00007678056,0.0039230566,0.0001541897,0.000046604153,0.0005832885,0.0011730399,0.00068206375,0.00078509626,0.43731132,0.51043296,0.04464432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060015645,0.000012793006,0.0086655235,0.00025745993,0.000029197121,0.000076846736,0.00079128094,0.00026048336,0.00037523056,0.015633468,0.9737714,0.00006618729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8433903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9327114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15660971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032218907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.099388115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.315064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187960577","doi":"","title":"A Layered Approach to Internet Legal Analysis","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Internet privacy; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Computer security; Computer science; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.023528547577304187,"score_gpt":0.2309727675822997,"score_spread":0.20744422000499552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187960577","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009848254,0.00049931015,0.92128223,0.004207134,0.00006431953,0.00010850998,0.0002469446,0.0005406713,0.06320263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36429054,0.001183736,0.60754395,0.0009946012,0.00035107307,0.00046617576,0.00048860995,0.0004893374,0.024192043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934127,0.0031953878,0.00041442114,0.00038828535,0.002019977,0.0005693358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98505485,0.0077943564,0.0008114442,0.0036225163,0.002115906,0.0006008964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006104079,0.00077306473,0.0007743303,0.008967884,0.0034232459,0.014217386,0.003641024,0.002851376,0.017388133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022351444,0.0015476237,0.0027655053,0.005908192,0.007850717,0.02403448,0.007070521,0.005553163,0.0026815173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006674212,0.00002154236,0.0003216076,0.000013966041,0.000015248835,0.00004157288,0.0003920868,0.0023080478,0.00010768972,0.98706657,0.0011228062,0.008582236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037643385,0.0000045911515,0.00017470142,0.0000455732,0.000026941296,0.00004289981,0.0002630645,0.02183743,0.00024397869,0.9701084,0.0072369585,0.000011703417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010581017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009776778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017388133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047658226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004330007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058169127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2194271303","doi":"","title":"The Colour of E-consent","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Precept; Core (optical fiber); Expression (computer science); Internet privacy; Computer science; Law; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01088136415921299,"score_gpt":0.23258157059072035,"score_spread":0.22170020643150737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2194271303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017580694,0.015314673,0.06927762,0.11212011,0.0024916292,0.00016854222,0.0001883663,0.00020244134,0.78265595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8287113,0.011315959,0.024697622,0.01873173,0.0028456673,0.0003231063,0.0001589817,0.0001942412,0.11302152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784877,0.012979776,0.001147154,0.0020405638,0.004297332,0.0010475138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97162884,0.01801511,0.0018767262,0.0054133,0.0020592157,0.0010068486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014762337,0.00049981463,0.0004900962,0.0016726864,0.004366296,0.012784325,0.0017385292,0.007756083,0.013201312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0399345,0.00038468832,0.0006041848,0.0022062075,0.036505435,0.019884463,0.008002173,0.0078915255,0.0024204704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008329866,0.0000053689773,0.000094336356,0.000033640223,0.0000014883641,0.000067002,0.0009083415,0.00007036894,0.000060829003,0.9861253,0.002238569,0.010386355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010417784,0.000021397811,0.00028790484,0.00026750157,0.0000039846864,0.00037412537,0.0012384505,0.00032105978,0.00042223203,0.8022486,0.1947848,0.000019525933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002487503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014915734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014762337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041134674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048001623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078071654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198285942","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2355838","title":"Substantive Unfairness of Pre-Dispute Arbitration Clauses in Consumer Contracts: The Argument for the Unconscionability Doctrine","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Doctrine; Arbitration; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Arbitration clause; Dispute resolution; Business; Compulsory arbitration; Law; Economics; Political science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.021147938566335452,"score_gpt":0.24691740740275733,"score_spread":0.22576946883642188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198285942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18812586,0.0024374803,0.1409956,0.06755377,0.0009865104,0.00030407368,0.00017661958,0.00011157586,0.5993086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980031,0.00037737514,0.0056548244,0.002892201,0.00049572723,0.000197976,0.00003204075,0.000036887606,0.010281994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97578794,0.009672288,0.001122377,0.0023937807,0.0077969716,0.003226606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91900444,0.06644589,0.0034548945,0.0061384244,0.0040102825,0.0009460725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027215753,0.000572983,0.0012280172,0.0018681225,0.0061994204,0.010587923,0.004816701,0.016919237,0.0100559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087024435,0.0011366063,0.0015469342,0.001734876,0.026667293,0.017622475,0.00557887,0.023301668,0.0008973342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013013947,0.000012692201,0.000052125735,0.000008010461,0.000003033422,0.000031777578,0.00022465648,0.00017702674,0.00006442792,0.99817824,0.00041350865,0.0008215566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002325033,0.0000071542913,0.00011206915,0.000019220426,0.000006939661,0.000020122367,0.00010591296,0.0011859037,0.00016223245,0.99673635,0.0016129626,0.0000079363845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030387365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025900614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027215753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005750489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073104315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14393234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198988274","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-18135-6_19","title":"Les Diverses Facettes de la Médiation au Québec : Présent et Avenir","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius comparatum","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Political science; Settlement (finance); Law; Civil code; Civil procedure; Computer science","score_opus":0.07314410340528188,"score_gpt":0.31250488846488667,"score_spread":0.23936078505960479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198988274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04521724,0.13681814,0.0034917896,0.054666292,0.0015250345,0.00008846819,0.0007264675,0.000100842095,0.7573657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4107302,0.041686736,0.0027829069,0.005286529,0.0003120769,0.00008303606,0.00037811653,0.00009419158,0.5386463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773395,0.00044286097,0.000061851635,0.00023952838,0.00085719855,0.0006646178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990658,0.00023309213,0.00005971556,0.00004866114,0.00044619385,0.00014661049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018298589,0.000609397,0.00048796312,0.0029573038,0.013540809,0.0132902665,0.0018936708,0.0032082591,0.021364067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029828134,0.00046615483,0.00056864665,0.007136688,0.0069290083,0.003539529,0.0022196663,0.0036695057,0.00086417294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055999448,0.000049858932,0.0037919302,0.0002899452,0.00004604949,0.00060323643,0.027510768,0.00077869487,0.00048164523,0.67237943,0.13481069,0.15920179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012674347,0.000018280203,0.012095487,0.00065397,0.000031723073,0.00023948723,0.021598957,0.000507008,0.0003138836,0.018239303,0.9462258,0.0000633289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99014133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99536765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097516745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.097516745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08942046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7075368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201120073","doi":"","title":"Interoperability and Standardization of Cyberjustice Systems: The Challenges Ahead","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Interoperability; Standardization; Work (physics); Computer science; Information flow; Economic Justice; Process management; Risk analysis (engineering); Political science; Computer security; Engineering management; Engineering; Business; Law; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.010161544456684834,"score_gpt":0.2149077903075565,"score_spread":0.20474624585087167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201120073","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045960482,0.046103366,0.6622684,0.12118592,0.0013404464,0.00042515423,0.00020633875,0.0007140563,0.1217958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7013625,0.036586322,0.2501523,0.004021149,0.0020778233,0.00055095233,0.00041945835,0.0002380173,0.0045914385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9503575,0.02775004,0.004565687,0.00193404,0.013796208,0.0015966045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94172645,0.034437556,0.0045876163,0.013065663,0.005191891,0.000990876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04037111,0.00077949866,0.001481204,0.0072704763,0.0030528232,0.024689054,0.004431059,0.0060984637,0.0034963624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046634965,0.00060972525,0.0016779125,0.00843067,0.02266097,0.03839113,0.007474373,0.0076428168,0.00061848556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004142281,0.0000262187,0.00030836384,0.00010602454,0.000015286161,0.000026284844,0.0007601765,0.0027802696,0.00009244759,0.95924896,0.00063829793,0.035993494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053656677,0.000026060763,0.0006080702,0.0005729476,0.0000110881365,0.0000700876,0.001574117,0.0038550224,0.00035001518,0.9605896,0.03231238,0.00002520294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032400354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002424182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04037111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005753265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010399649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21350539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202588340","doi":"","title":"New Trends in Procedural Law: New Technologies and the Civil Litigation Process","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Civil litigation; Law; Civil procedure; Process (computing); Political science; Procedural law; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.009825095959582942,"score_gpt":0.22722900346586378,"score_spread":0.21740390750628083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202588340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11663447,0.12691876,0.015160388,0.16302344,0.0029372512,0.00007910622,0.00024250241,0.00016759743,0.5748365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81943774,0.10587751,0.00775241,0.014760262,0.003744997,0.00008501054,0.00023218227,0.00016886143,0.04794099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989643,0.0035615454,0.00040739597,0.0004695682,0.004910653,0.00100786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96473956,0.023638057,0.004655091,0.0016057721,0.0034545895,0.0019070025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008221361,0.0003237481,0.0003546924,0.0038294152,0.0026827853,0.019731736,0.0013164437,0.003967524,0.016858201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026594492,0.00023675893,0.000755622,0.0063313814,0.015735049,0.02315884,0.0035807532,0.00468463,0.0019240507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012024603,0.000093173876,0.0036849089,0.00029418268,0.000024232673,0.00024272931,0.005092689,0.00061623653,0.00033732873,0.88735706,0.014475955,0.08766118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045191955,0.0003176819,0.020406058,0.0014960141,0.00005590865,0.0011640596,0.02728143,0.0021951282,0.0010432465,0.49297693,0.45291916,0.000099205936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008152176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020199357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019731736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068663363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061523438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203930612","doi":"","title":"집합동산담보의 활성화에 관한 입법론적 고찰","year":2011,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"한양법학","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Security interest; Economic security; Business; Security through obscurity; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Cloud computing security; Finance; Security information and event management","score_opus":0.04320078157489102,"score_gpt":0.22223115397070373,"score_spread":0.1790303723958127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203930612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015013224,0.0034381414,0.0033608149,0.013656698,0.0016828299,0.000110063585,0.0006573887,0.00030279777,0.9617779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13958402,0.0034737983,0.0026804141,0.0053992625,0.000335553,0.00006224582,0.0009831518,0.00009995598,0.84738165],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991322,0.00010516528,0.000030447753,0.00017529962,0.00038240716,0.00017444292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897385,0.00009101954,0.000081629005,0.00007213585,0.0006100576,0.0001713752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068728207,0.00028658373,0.00018505611,0.00067991484,0.0035544306,0.0036638216,0.0005032893,0.0009651392,0.09594865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014991908,0.00017318988,0.00024087816,0.0008718224,0.001326345,0.0016297454,0.001194685,0.0015755525,0.026352223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008748259,0.000094444316,0.005668537,0.00029015975,0.00002032762,0.0007307953,0.0042235334,0.0002870732,0.0023962895,0.28250507,0.51776993,0.18592641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030705066,0.000013452952,0.0037420169,0.00006070019,0.000004599251,0.00017605837,0.0008342675,0.00012497799,0.00053005357,0.004273968,0.99022573,0.000011230022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036991864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046996612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09594865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033744725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053136516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3209802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204671290","doi":"","title":"Access to Justice and the Evolution of Class Action Litigation in Australia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Class action; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.027350835218240357,"score_gpt":0.2828622483874474,"score_spread":0.25551141316920706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2204671290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85891116,0.0018544649,0.0014927585,0.013416813,0.000051858147,0.00005297257,0.000033316126,0.000024164165,0.12416252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925291,0.00030930233,0.00027275173,0.0006056486,0.000021128431,0.000012439079,0.000005930728,0.0000052176574,0.0062384126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99296194,0.0019124832,0.0003287283,0.00070079055,0.0020884993,0.0020075259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872162,0.0053941505,0.00296555,0.0007122354,0.0017747938,0.0019370103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054620816,0.00009999322,0.000357045,0.0029705267,0.006041303,0.008326784,0.0015931149,0.0035578827,0.006476164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027363246,0.00048701777,0.0003421093,0.0021027955,0.010679763,0.0042019067,0.0067370404,0.0035126614,0.00033089513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017656418,0.00047032844,0.05974967,0.00019703359,0.000058286965,0.0023790586,0.13458776,0.002284648,0.0027393193,0.6572565,0.0036100508,0.13649076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069633636,0.00054170954,0.6414047,0.00050136214,0.00007496062,0.0016042158,0.04411027,0.007829923,0.0012889026,0.13240641,0.16994323,0.00022465101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18218568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.234452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18218568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02192183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009191048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3622505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204923942","doi":"","title":"Clashing Classes Down Under-Evaluating Australia‘s Competing Class Actions Through Empirical and Comparative Perspectives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Supreme court; Political science; Empirical research; Civil procedure; Law; Action (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; State (computer science); Epistemology","score_opus":0.23561866315567,"score_gpt":0.386035088000742,"score_spread":0.15041642484507198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2204923942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7133467,0.0023611004,0.0015878965,0.015044839,0.00010251248,0.00006418268,0.000025988913,0.0000074745567,0.26745927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928099,0.00045242597,0.00036686155,0.0008195576,0.000018372033,0.000014619357,0.0000077360555,0.000005818773,0.005504745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98783034,0.0053932336,0.00031538957,0.0006640509,0.003395142,0.0024018518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794144,0.012751855,0.001889732,0.0011683544,0.003823346,0.000952333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014335702,0.00020159839,0.0004331083,0.0044104275,0.015097842,0.010882169,0.0016383289,0.0027143515,0.0047129756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026826972,0.0002528134,0.0003339938,0.003808684,0.024961887,0.0069658044,0.007659171,0.0050219265,0.00017601474],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003213906,0.00008178479,0.010858846,0.00013535644,0.00001648924,0.000581523,0.4528069,0.0002664873,0.0004013234,0.49652135,0.0028444633,0.035453286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011329424,0.00008369028,0.074147165,0.0007806981,0.000040543408,0.00034626914,0.71385175,0.0016037035,0.00091598806,0.070031986,0.13811752,0.000069330745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29669747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47192204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29669747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027342636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020548455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.589941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210701602","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2423956","title":"Commercial Litigation Funding: Ethical, Regulatory and Comparative Perspectives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.029718876492234467,"score_gpt":0.2674443768134488,"score_spread":0.2377255003212143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2210701602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01592542,0.03889596,0.0130769815,0.43903804,0.0019254785,0.00004743491,0.00014203096,0.000044702378,0.49090394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8926292,0.020508658,0.0051664216,0.046212345,0.0087822,0.0003812113,0.00010532345,0.000101850186,0.026112687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9563726,0.027029797,0.0014679852,0.0018842347,0.008546426,0.004698962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85776395,0.12134688,0.00474674,0.0035736854,0.009864227,0.0027045656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.062933676,0.0007128443,0.0012657914,0.00881138,0.00965918,0.03429067,0.0041879336,0.028505951,0.012825536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09612139,0.0007310727,0.00080307055,0.009270658,0.0450248,0.023253046,0.006430588,0.012060072,0.0009497449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007884953,0.000008788503,0.00009719256,0.00002668374,0.000002271217,0.000026256546,0.00055840914,0.00005952996,0.000017891223,0.9943065,0.0026272691,0.0022612272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003866936,0.00004250905,0.0007836392,0.0006796682,0.000021188778,0.00021327357,0.00586355,0.0005118685,0.00025135497,0.8925917,0.098971054,0.000031456955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058783987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008708424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062933676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013428508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012457008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33282906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216654447","doi":"","title":"Lepine v. Canada Post: Ironing Out the Wrinkles in the Inter-Provincial Enforcement of Class Judgments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Plaintiff; Appeal; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Enforcement; Damages; Civil procedure; Notice; Class action; Jurisdiction; Class (philosophy); Sociology; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.008445621826692574,"score_gpt":0.21644397902678436,"score_spread":0.2079983572000918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2216654447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13596527,0.007955793,0.0027142658,0.31942788,0.0010311735,0.000092621,0.00078773213,0.00013930231,0.53188586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7842851,0.0017730683,0.001144971,0.040425934,0.0001600657,0.00003180575,0.00009842814,0.000046187986,0.17203443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969584,0.00029811938,0.000044677687,0.00024922492,0.0012334799,0.0012161606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971111,0.00107253,0.00018097478,0.00011666148,0.0010720605,0.00044660398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018173419,0.00020636403,0.00026784546,0.0006784998,0.021918604,0.007965189,0.001279678,0.0072072423,0.0059475326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066469666,0.00033407088,0.0002962315,0.00106285,0.0064379317,0.002073714,0.001629035,0.006726808,0.00043344204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111177535,0.00002049721,0.0066157277,0.00008512725,0.000018399687,0.0015670407,0.012090355,0.00058527506,0.0007819155,0.6611396,0.28692147,0.03006342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006362052,0.000057549958,0.031158013,0.00031649176,0.00005095382,0.00047410352,0.017577648,0.0023198484,0.002199238,0.036477447,0.90909296,0.00021200451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9793759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051576823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051576823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06760561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3742178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224284647","doi":"","title":"Consumer Privacy and Radio Frequency Identification Technology","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Consumer privacy; Radio-frequency identification; Identification (biology); Business; Internet privacy; Telecommunications; Information privacy; Advertising; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.010524500300039465,"score_gpt":0.22596889175610416,"score_spread":0.2154443914560647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224284647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038548306,0.0076884576,0.032573137,0.07610622,0.00056473527,0.00009140993,0.00006212127,0.00006802078,0.8442976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85950387,0.0042447806,0.008177719,0.025754213,0.00076227915,0.0001400821,0.000035120225,0.000044567805,0.10133733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916568,0.0040589403,0.00032036015,0.00082351646,0.0021302127,0.0010101353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99288636,0.004914707,0.00062524143,0.00090484007,0.000502722,0.00016622704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00585418,0.00031432015,0.00036082714,0.0007944635,0.004528092,0.010775242,0.00081044674,0.011060779,0.0055150115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0089138765,0.00041069015,0.00053458253,0.0014090898,0.019058427,0.0084952945,0.0034223576,0.006407976,0.0009774449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067057167,0.000011698626,0.00035459799,0.000008382266,0.000001833839,0.000093336355,0.0019801045,0.000071142254,0.000082443235,0.9912815,0.0014873304,0.0046209255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013124385,0.00006760705,0.0016328734,0.00021847936,0.000015237859,0.00072577276,0.004862968,0.00072315906,0.0012679134,0.7246473,0.26578978,0.000035815447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034412537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002277089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011060779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029857445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023987086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030960202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228481979","doi":"","title":"El acuerdo de arbitraje como clausula abusiva en los contratos de consumo (The Arbitration Agreement as Abusive Clause in Consumer Contracts)","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Consumer law; Arbitration; Humanities; Consumer protection; Political science; Welfare economics; Business; Economics; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00526994858622993,"score_gpt":0.2470837671617793,"score_spread":0.24181381857554937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228481979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14606614,0.0058289757,0.1247509,0.021915972,0.0013009912,0.000764265,0.0005400899,0.00024008997,0.69859254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8738349,0.0010370376,0.015787229,0.0035865167,0.00048738168,0.00038666563,0.00017180796,0.00010433079,0.10460413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99137914,0.0027760433,0.00073371077,0.0011313705,0.0029951117,0.0009846574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917134,0.004170859,0.001161795,0.00096942735,0.0016617378,0.00032288046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008577258,0.000325175,0.00039487606,0.00073252816,0.0034968576,0.004541735,0.0013105159,0.0052883853,0.011634397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013006233,0.00049717986,0.0005536663,0.0012706056,0.0077691954,0.004142115,0.0030460202,0.0043373094,0.0015126206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005339737,0.000027136139,0.0007305349,0.000064088155,0.0000071478826,0.00023874303,0.0018262136,0.00034228968,0.0007835066,0.9790244,0.005693675,0.011208768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018256957,0.0001488757,0.0074454155,0.00044261717,0.0000710605,0.0008702974,0.0017310398,0.0072085573,0.0060011875,0.6008072,0.37495226,0.00013899151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011254713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009311935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011634397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003639734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055097155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0453614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W223741241","doi":"","title":"About Preferability in the Quebec Class Actions Regime (À Propos De L'Opportunité Du Recours Collectif...)","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Certification; Action (physics); Political science; Welfare economics; Humanities; Economics; Mathematics; Law; Physics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.020845628789541,"score_gpt":0.2590425709837497,"score_spread":0.23819694219420873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W223741241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19423817,0.00443674,0.009913074,0.060423464,0.00023175136,0.00010730999,0.00040895626,0.000032279357,0.7302083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.968198,0.0005536466,0.00088657276,0.0032231293,0.00008753923,0.000043649165,0.0000382667,0.000010218578,0.026959078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934702,0.001337798,0.00022416093,0.0006651165,0.0014094136,0.0028932826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922977,0.003669772,0.00095957314,0.00056547043,0.001934308,0.0005731791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073458645,0.00026898732,0.0005242452,0.0016017549,0.013451408,0.011763089,0.0018663787,0.007639328,0.010250276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011550481,0.00027843736,0.0006334652,0.0020004096,0.01820981,0.0051719104,0.0029920435,0.0061191986,0.00046719884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016800235,0.000008402444,0.001390348,0.000012531026,0.0000062827366,0.00013069465,0.0029432122,0.00017225504,0.00006254022,0.98932207,0.0029983826,0.002936545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007290824,0.00007367402,0.03226515,0.00038041334,0.0000752541,0.0006701711,0.02036843,0.0029907133,0.0006113394,0.80918336,0.13311152,0.00019701678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7891012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8643932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21089882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037570875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017139766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42428166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2239273003","doi":"","title":"Green Light For Indirect Purchaser Claims in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Antitrust chronicle","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Class (philosophy); Law; Economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01194097999907091,"score_gpt":0.2020969606499891,"score_spread":0.1901559806509182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2239273003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3032,0.008982048,0.0012135957,0.059732378,0.0008464102,0.00029964882,0.0010807988,0.00019497868,0.6244501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8118752,0.0052821054,0.0011894278,0.012024682,0.00020542173,0.00004702475,0.0004804568,0.000081270555,0.16881445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549663,0.00016320372,0.00007898619,0.00025242651,0.002559026,0.0014497178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99430877,0.0011448499,0.0001829211,0.00017458948,0.0032367345,0.0009522445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022368375,0.00030490675,0.00047275054,0.0021363196,0.017557165,0.008159995,0.0019518213,0.005175044,0.018217513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008919806,0.00039994158,0.0007512903,0.0018748885,0.002552596,0.0011314653,0.0028245125,0.004615939,0.0011519629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082932616,0.00068767584,0.07134698,0.00039021941,0.00019841475,0.0056674425,0.009977568,0.0039288653,0.0035062304,0.26620325,0.44345808,0.193806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053357426,0.0003774859,0.19239098,0.0010424848,0.00048997044,0.0013480949,0.02282427,0.008847626,0.0041192854,0.02711692,0.74038994,0.0005193412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9898431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07550553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07550553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15389638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54783356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240799370","doi":"","title":"Family Dispute Resolution by Negotiation and Mediation: A Canadian Perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Mediation; Dispute resolution; Perspective (graphical); Alternative dispute resolution; Lawyer supported mediation; Online dispute resolution; Dispute mechanism; Conciliation; Political science; Law and economics; Family mediation; Resolution (logic); Law; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.004047159503693628,"score_gpt":0.2020274444758071,"score_spread":0.19798028497211345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240799370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01790077,0.069671325,0.010574696,0.10666073,0.0007119356,0.0000977397,0.00032863702,0.00004187543,0.7940123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80099094,0.10397253,0.012231801,0.008458499,0.00076901674,0.00013909838,0.00019801584,0.00007931038,0.07316079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99293834,0.0024215765,0.00019853242,0.00057832076,0.0019616138,0.0019016891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507153,0.0023241888,0.00030163137,0.00018491255,0.0015298367,0.00058791484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006329435,0.0010142067,0.0012401815,0.008890502,0.019431906,0.015383092,0.0045036613,0.008122169,0.017604308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011796078,0.0008813047,0.00089369086,0.011510726,0.03175822,0.007869578,0.0032521558,0.006389556,0.00065462897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136118215,0.000013519295,0.0002511399,0.000046010577,0.0000055723817,0.00014273578,0.0032526832,0.0006488807,0.00002005238,0.98325306,0.004830617,0.00752206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008650004,0.00003397938,0.0037044669,0.0009830053,0.000062662424,0.0004605825,0.02023923,0.0043971413,0.00018864486,0.62382793,0.34587395,0.00014192292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9854726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98174196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17060499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17060499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1645342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96198064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246192528","doi":"10.29173/alr1333","title":"Thinking About Dispute Resolution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University; University of Toronto; University of Alberta; University of Victoria","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Dispute board; Dispute mechanism; Political science; Law; Resolution (logic); Computer science","score_opus":0.01787457590951703,"score_gpt":0.24780583663760572,"score_spread":0.2299312607280887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246192528","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005362395,0.57632387,0.025823733,0.25966182,0.012488271,0.000057533747,0.0000864926,0.00008424986,0.12493779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06589462,0.69798857,0.02986674,0.14205939,0.024709852,0.00041124824,0.00026372584,0.00028255125,0.03852337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728425,0.014971372,0.0013990272,0.0022872777,0.007159935,0.0013397598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793635,0.014227974,0.0011039288,0.001281685,0.003157228,0.0008655715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024957547,0.001766342,0.0019401227,0.007650886,0.009648057,0.023925763,0.0056018494,0.012429268,0.010082574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027969662,0.00096351205,0.0015674067,0.007349412,0.06292877,0.037964113,0.0069891396,0.02112465,0.0046827937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060619523,0.000011144172,0.00006496778,0.00048718357,0.000012748096,0.00005542873,0.003186877,0.00018597534,0.000038830196,0.8960376,0.07345709,0.02645615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042976503,0.000006712371,0.000054339183,0.0013971437,0.0000043520895,0.0001058792,0.002212907,0.00007900817,0.00003245242,0.5208614,0.47522983,0.00001165034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009313655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01025078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024957547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017076023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012031291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13198972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246233972","doi":"","title":"Resolving Mass Legal Disputes Through Class Arbitration: The United States and Canada Compared","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Supreme court; Compulsory arbitration; Political science; Dispute resolution; Law; Class (philosophy); Federal Arbitration Act; Arbitration clause; Law and economics; Civil procedure; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.054179599218939806,"score_gpt":0.2501517217395624,"score_spread":0.1959721225206226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246233972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40180108,0.011788384,0.0026364133,0.033640172,0.00031666827,0.00016649658,0.00026625636,0.00004624003,0.5493383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770315,0.003725457,0.0013671152,0.0019092466,0.000025795447,0.000020393116,0.00007251767,0.000013440864,0.015834633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949285,0.0006749401,0.00010347768,0.00026488592,0.0019302084,0.0020980698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968335,0.00082598825,0.00020110371,0.00011242896,0.0014751074,0.0005519269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027597148,0.00016174463,0.00040315342,0.0023334436,0.014510234,0.008851675,0.0013612846,0.0019814228,0.0053668967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009435599,0.00024358493,0.0003064782,0.0040854383,0.0058723046,0.001988023,0.0028123907,0.0019296473,0.00019384464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021682706,0.000083066996,0.020739743,0.00027298977,0.00007874734,0.00093769794,0.03593938,0.0035533293,0.00073283334,0.78620017,0.030874893,0.12037035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019949167,0.00011416612,0.105845645,0.0013244052,0.00028473086,0.0005239445,0.16178381,0.007598868,0.0026360615,0.0659392,0.65342695,0.00032274882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99079424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99681973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08411369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08411369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.112724945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6102904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252319907","doi":"","title":"Angle droit sur la visiojustice! Petit décalogue à l’usage du praticien (Spotlight on Videoconferencing in the Courtroom: Practitioners’ Ten Commandments)","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Discretion; Political science; Law; Art; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.017105536554473548,"score_gpt":0.24513874117692766,"score_spread":0.2280332046224541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252319907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13026524,0.019065361,0.013548777,0.15165961,0.0026049332,0.00018772196,0.0014127151,0.00042816423,0.68082744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7726548,0.0075998255,0.0037726723,0.007955974,0.00030497214,0.000098474804,0.00026817236,0.00026974443,0.20707537],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99466115,0.001812883,0.00013487082,0.0005380528,0.0020116642,0.00084137893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99085194,0.0028215316,0.00054788304,0.00046705804,0.004249083,0.0010625969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003181552,0.00044516387,0.00028546486,0.001550748,0.013394841,0.008570526,0.0011010331,0.0020827993,0.03511434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010249066,0.0002571557,0.00021828162,0.0030732902,0.01098241,0.0036911797,0.002533649,0.003149708,0.0026423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011717855,0.000046842753,0.008372361,0.0006733277,0.00001748072,0.001158763,0.30924642,0.00038147936,0.0030015665,0.23573439,0.2508083,0.19044189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041102385,0.000030960906,0.012467748,0.00050408154,0.000008807294,0.00023295163,0.100180455,0.00013330152,0.0005914619,0.0027078725,0.8830884,0.00004984773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85657185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9055774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85657185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034571078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028435824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2885456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255784613","doi":"10.29173/alr1327","title":"Standing to Sue and Multiple Defendant Class Actions in Australia, Canada, and the United States","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Plaintiff; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Law; Political science; Ideal (ethics); Law and economics; Sociology; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.03532496756690896,"score_gpt":0.26559521193724356,"score_spread":0.2302702443703346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255784613","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38103637,0.029173851,0.0011079237,0.08714558,0.0006794957,0.00014006683,0.00024571127,0.000028871638,0.50044215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95418924,0.0068866955,0.0005311837,0.008474699,0.00019770802,0.00004280244,0.00005948836,0.000015063838,0.02960314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98172474,0.0022196004,0.0005856236,0.0011430939,0.008303218,0.006023725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98147523,0.006656499,0.0016413338,0.0005797502,0.0054947236,0.0041525075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008416897,0.00030725406,0.00093052216,0.00502559,0.023962721,0.011142132,0.0026333542,0.007818977,0.0048769703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022944342,0.000644871,0.0006872952,0.0038392656,0.014908849,0.0027549276,0.0064820666,0.009297746,0.00026921977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011916476,0.00017666955,0.032353047,0.00018661802,0.000107288426,0.003505242,0.019547487,0.0014083491,0.0004008118,0.8296082,0.04871911,0.063868165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026719974,0.00017216802,0.29151592,0.001980749,0.0005786096,0.0025550474,0.061699323,0.007822931,0.0015958428,0.16177648,0.46936607,0.0006696069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94925725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98461145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061911587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061911587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09834383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44920206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259500538","doi":"","title":"Hidden Costs Of The Wireless Broadband Lifestyle: Comparing Consumer Protections In The United States, Canada, And The European Union","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Legislature; European union; Business; Wireless broadband; Consumer protection; Wireless; Consumer privacy; Broadband; Duty; Telecommunications; Computer security; International trade; Commerce; Wireless network; Engineering; Information privacy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.010209166564430534,"score_gpt":0.19857383168434642,"score_spread":0.1883646651199159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259500538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86693573,0.0035828617,0.0004594761,0.0051486082,0.0000410676,0.000064622276,0.0005532945,0.000014370553,0.12320001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962365,0.0008779208,0.00011153466,0.00034490426,0.000007631174,0.000008118286,0.00015359552,0.000004397265,0.0022555569],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930408,0.0005360505,0.00014356861,0.00021281272,0.0038931002,0.0021735765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914341,0.002522896,0.0018080415,0.0003530402,0.0028940253,0.0009878349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023542834,0.0001893827,0.00047073577,0.0030789683,0.005469736,0.0058300444,0.0010588337,0.001157101,0.0035660297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013812969,0.00017994734,0.0005791909,0.005029039,0.0053671356,0.0016015971,0.0029603466,0.0018304713,0.000101978825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010063548,0.00044499023,0.47655678,0.00027677751,0.00039998756,0.0011541441,0.026472842,0.0073826634,0.0005709702,0.31677377,0.01495975,0.15400088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008508135,0.00015819991,0.8775176,0.00046428104,0.00029379767,0.0002118706,0.043657664,0.002530687,0.0007974027,0.010708213,0.06343829,0.00013698872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96034896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9766778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049601696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049601696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035328783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35988718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261790605","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i1.209","title":"The United States Experience with Competition Class Action Certification: A Comment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Enforcement; Class (philosophy); Competition (biology); Certification; Action (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.0496901022622414,"score_gpt":0.27518986055539557,"score_spread":0.22549975829315416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261790605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012169811,0.0054034996,0.00016296626,0.96485025,0.00831996,0.000022952761,0.00016807379,0.000037390375,0.01981784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014622497,0.0027955659,0.00023639778,0.96595377,0.0031868506,0.000045910474,0.00007073972,0.00003344626,0.013054882],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9714802,0.0046618036,0.001948055,0.0034917193,0.013134826,0.0052833566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9340464,0.034379005,0.0029062866,0.0018047835,0.022698548,0.0041650413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022218172,0.0007452186,0.001179188,0.00195726,0.020847075,0.01356007,0.0064470517,0.060110163,0.008121497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05246511,0.0012458859,0.0016348276,0.005161386,0.011752329,0.007590107,0.004220381,0.044316094,0.0022543073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024683171,0.000013750954,0.0005239087,0.00009274122,0.000010004328,0.00028034978,0.0018042008,0.000038879694,0.00010759996,0.032442648,0.96080184,0.0038594592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020397461,0.000017500382,0.0017066464,0.00029268343,0.000032120694,0.00012769963,0.002045129,0.000057502937,0.00024856022,0.0017581187,0.9936178,0.00007586864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.800519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84939104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.800519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03986387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09338275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40131158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263057021","doi":"","title":"Internet Intermediaries Liability. A North American Perspective or Perspectives from the United States and Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Intermediary; The Internet; Legislation; Liability; Business; Perspective (graphical); Internet governance; Political science; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science; Marketing; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.012131959113442801,"score_gpt":0.2240093146384938,"score_spread":0.211877355525051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263057021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025853278,0.069547266,0.0017241477,0.17368858,0.00075828395,0.000047264602,0.0003580862,0.000029077226,0.727994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7572146,0.07646348,0.0023417356,0.043631487,0.0006706725,0.00005909651,0.00022928914,0.000049300896,0.1193404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558216,0.00043203175,0.00010138509,0.00043337766,0.0019030393,0.0015479835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732095,0.0005839624,0.00023914284,0.00011394258,0.0012503404,0.0004917555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019897039,0.0005520091,0.0003533483,0.0035913459,0.014810727,0.013465304,0.0019193761,0.007643808,0.006545485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035429446,0.0003428794,0.0005755825,0.004446397,0.015061575,0.0061357506,0.0022895879,0.0056353235,0.0005841027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006104108,0.000012793593,0.00061915384,0.000035389046,0.000003368778,0.00013325167,0.003323072,0.0001425885,0.000070605616,0.9693657,0.017770479,0.008517431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012675411,0.000017692857,0.006114173,0.00079090084,0.000036089055,0.00024998718,0.012348637,0.0005982623,0.00032556313,0.11215687,0.86727524,0.00007379135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9616186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97438264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08872101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08872101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09440051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64371896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263155033","doi":"","title":"[새로운 범죄대응전략으로서 화해조정체계구축(I)] 주요 외국의 형사화해조정 운용 및 평가에 관한 연구","year":2008,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"형사정책연구원 연구총서","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Mediation; Psychology; Neglect; Political science; Government (linguistics); Criminal justice; Party-directed mediation; Social psychology; Criminology; Public relations; Alternative dispute resolution; Law","score_opus":0.025446917947799328,"score_gpt":0.22678616405529453,"score_spread":0.2013392461074952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263155033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004661367,0.0045855907,0.006328238,0.06276328,0.012663383,0.0002645336,0.00028799675,0.00027161662,0.908174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13730012,0.0042922706,0.006883202,0.060539823,0.0033126539,0.00039789607,0.00036716394,0.00015183983,0.7867551],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769104,0.0005406833,0.00012821848,0.00040881571,0.00084520644,0.00038595498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828005,0.00027891755,0.00017063926,0.00014239344,0.0009121149,0.00021582842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017365888,0.00048917474,0.0002867748,0.00045025937,0.006507663,0.00458359,0.0012613697,0.004168146,0.02268136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004262072,0.0003132734,0.0003354203,0.00063866685,0.0057016453,0.003508775,0.0022304123,0.006325426,0.0149552105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026207155,0.000028017404,0.00076218316,0.00019685214,0.0000073644705,0.0003476584,0.009914602,0.000069549984,0.00054277095,0.42569098,0.52558005,0.03683368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003949342,0.000014416627,0.00072990725,0.00011911234,0.0000037878158,0.00030720455,0.0015980307,0.00008792195,0.00025789675,0.013597855,0.98326427,0.000015782793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018084202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024750149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02268136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028097748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004816902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07587671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263549130","doi":"","title":"Facets of Fairness: Kidd v. Canada Life Assurance Company and the Approval of Class Action Settlements","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Class action; Appeal; Context (archaeology); Law; Pension; Political science; Human settlement; Sociology; Law and economics; Business; Finance; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.019541074970604644,"score_gpt":0.2298481794428143,"score_spread":0.21030710447220965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263549130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10823079,0.006477837,0.0058914223,0.1700085,0.0015928458,0.00035083768,0.00037128077,0.000108736174,0.7069678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85225576,0.0015935119,0.0021067383,0.05425906,0.00040543993,0.00016705254,0.000097851735,0.00006394322,0.0890506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96543616,0.0044772536,0.0010420566,0.0030081777,0.014999311,0.01103713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983743,0.00722377,0.00082290557,0.0008878587,0.0049603144,0.0023621134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01640724,0.00043706913,0.0008319328,0.0020452694,0.042182405,0.02061556,0.0042954767,0.020786526,0.0048116455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039700747,0.0009983834,0.00097556005,0.0021025084,0.025035093,0.0049728374,0.0070417426,0.019023774,0.0004353381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003904448,0.000036152105,0.0035431671,0.000037493424,0.000018682951,0.00063724385,0.009549678,0.0002786781,0.00020339295,0.9409214,0.035740986,0.008994136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000323013,0.00013235482,0.03153722,0.0008194186,0.00024513426,0.0008140706,0.028242327,0.0033984077,0.0023825925,0.24397945,0.68741584,0.0007101389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9405818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9600619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08546216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08546216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1421381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6200743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264270468","doi":"","title":"Mandatory Mediation in Civil Cases: Purposes and Consequences","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Civil procedure; Alternative dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Intervention (counseling); Sample (material); Law; Political science; Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.011658879518094292,"score_gpt":0.23253187358220967,"score_spread":0.22087299406411537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264270468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9316233,0.0019140666,0.0059821797,0.013140944,0.00019165278,0.0017546448,0.00020239422,0.00014195831,0.04504887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993863,0.00030076093,0.0024179225,0.0008917654,0.000060708844,0.0006497824,0.000058795256,0.00002627065,0.0017310074],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.72830987,0.19703975,0.0075851497,0.0040429947,0.050715666,0.012306619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46160287,0.40179327,0.039222192,0.039090224,0.049752507,0.008538987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15620446,0.00060155004,0.0007873804,0.0027076632,0.009529135,0.0055613895,0.0045934054,0.0028775216,0.0053433245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4213003,0.00072493736,0.0009013175,0.004174865,0.01419284,0.006382216,0.013138169,0.0030398692,0.00061391847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027597283,0.0038966963,0.29190847,0.002116174,0.00015741111,0.0035515998,0.15679272,0.0036460252,0.0036304388,0.11430208,0.012391396,0.40484726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007551217,0.006976546,0.5891013,0.0031671494,0.00021860542,0.0031709226,0.24835433,0.0066546192,0.010767818,0.031878833,0.09867041,0.00028426974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025497425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041011147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15620446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014647728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022300882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.826098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266080888","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1454","title":"Class Actions as Alternative Dispute Resolution","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Class action; Political science; Realm; Dispute resolution; Legislature; Settlement (finance); Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Legislation; Class (philosophy); Business; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.03475755917033904,"score_gpt":0.27112096154805787,"score_spread":0.23636340237771883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266080888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016280254,0.0024234124,0.12872744,0.008261145,0.00039496826,0.000228365,0.000058215224,0.00011498442,0.8435112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86320037,0.0013464608,0.050634805,0.0017894686,0.00035348686,0.00036660317,0.00008963715,0.00009797826,0.08212117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9618539,0.017643593,0.0015738006,0.003924086,0.011667832,0.0033366233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862373,0.006517539,0.0017214352,0.0031572394,0.0016107252,0.00075582776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021398036,0.0008146701,0.00076632603,0.0046487115,0.006764216,0.015251364,0.004363068,0.007135641,0.017293474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02269691,0.00045555574,0.0013837899,0.00260087,0.0324547,0.012778013,0.010823834,0.00555762,0.0022857657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016625611,0.000005149011,0.000034336284,0.000007532883,0.0000011079946,0.000015519025,0.0005505181,0.00012194569,0.000020210957,0.99643826,0.00019883305,0.0026049253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021627548,0.000014221876,0.00013480117,0.00008809051,0.000007282718,0.000089576955,0.0012075556,0.0019330245,0.0001592909,0.92817223,0.06815353,0.00001864598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009382838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008777474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021398036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01187259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073431116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11316502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267292937","doi":"","title":"Book Review: 'E-Discovery in Canada' by Todd J. Burke, Kelly Friedman, Andrew J. Mccreary, James Morton, Susan Nickle, Vincenzo Rondinelli, Glenn Smith, James Swanson & Susan Wortzman","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Civil litigation; Civil procedure; Law and economics; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Law; History; Political science; Operations research; Engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.0038183254076258615,"score_gpt":0.20257561947198635,"score_spread":0.1987572940643605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267292937","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040801792,0.49164695,0.0003634076,0.20839807,0.11313653,0.0001640402,0.0013083286,0.00015708455,0.18441762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0051184734,0.41094053,0.00045033137,0.055554148,0.0272526,0.00008458846,0.0009189888,0.00014438784,0.4995358],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714893,0.00013684187,0.00007797609,0.0001649967,0.0021763432,0.0002948962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99087584,0.0013711005,0.0002581524,0.00017205582,0.0062980345,0.0010249658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014500052,0.0011789617,0.0013724923,0.0038896478,0.004701301,0.006728478,0.0027908604,0.0045459885,0.04761004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007688754,0.00054905907,0.00047440638,0.011112073,0.0033289872,0.0031159178,0.0013207733,0.0035898092,0.01619126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016981983,0.0000016923685,0.000020873731,0.0000662566,7.6505995e-7,0.0000075600724,0.000013403788,0.000021887272,0.000006058489,0.0007695361,0.99279296,0.006297343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002503027,0.0000019661215,0.00022850257,0.0002849679,0.0000019335143,0.000020942383,0.000044972985,0.000014271117,0.000008129352,0.00021280731,0.9991731,0.000005902594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8172647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9351091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18273532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038001467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06850125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3676229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267937921","doi":"","title":"Social Media: The Basics for the Family Law Practitioner","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Public relations; Face (sociological concept); Reading (process); Identity (music); Media relations; Family law; The Internet; Sociology; Internet privacy; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.018350541159685728,"score_gpt":0.2405584900273625,"score_spread":0.22220794886767675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267937921","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013970499,0.025681458,0.0030403065,0.9329807,0.0033640128,0.00005197753,0.00003069173,0.00008432917,0.033369508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.186546,0.1639886,0.029660128,0.49176374,0.021911474,0.0009373496,0.000118287455,0.0003946649,0.10467974],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937558,0.0035221486,0.00034792983,0.0003230632,0.0014718747,0.0005791207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731785,0.014610907,0.000751483,0.0015537004,0.0036501603,0.0062551484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011925125,0.0006604481,0.0009196873,0.002290917,0.010035395,0.008341188,0.0018809044,0.017063024,0.015242451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033300515,0.0005960438,0.0004685187,0.001148848,0.019277845,0.023541082,0.006666569,0.016370568,0.007083381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055828055,0.00030310045,0.0019640534,0.00065634237,0.000017464961,0.003426587,0.03985483,0.00010921891,0.0006304752,0.14928107,0.54880404,0.2548971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017471048,0.000068981666,0.00073078164,0.0019610657,0.000006973729,0.0022429838,0.02076552,0.00008020457,0.00009386966,0.10795006,0.8660514,0.00003077323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006439222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074757324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017063024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033663455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011949973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0630669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270962194","doi":"","title":"The 'Third Option': International Commercial Mediation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Mediation; Arbitration; Adversarial system; Alternative dispute resolution; Political science; Dispute resolution; Ethos; Context (archaeology); Law; Dispute mechanism; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.00845316482941001,"score_gpt":0.2459251175484324,"score_spread":0.2374719527190224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270962194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066509634,0.0028033718,0.056252763,0.021664865,0.0004599224,0.00009644037,0.000040971372,0.000069287344,0.85210276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97993016,0.0006959186,0.0048292414,0.0025033702,0.00015272482,0.00009956265,0.000018166442,0.000031714942,0.01173917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986115,0.0071923807,0.00042815923,0.0014547331,0.0033143787,0.0014953413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987379,0.0073280693,0.001447874,0.0025654624,0.00094073365,0.0003389253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0140836425,0.00034669405,0.00047043097,0.001160879,0.004195559,0.00858588,0.0014306933,0.0046277847,0.009244915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022513134,0.00020706806,0.00063676236,0.0016136965,0.018810714,0.008803932,0.007775804,0.004929504,0.00069434947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006522041,0.0000050712197,0.0003219522,0.000017003533,0.0000034991933,0.00004746042,0.0014052856,0.00006022042,0.000057358204,0.99375373,0.0005350828,0.0037867106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003793109,0.00004675697,0.0019157868,0.0003228007,0.000040529016,0.000547469,0.004576509,0.0020615363,0.0015473804,0.8732439,0.11562151,0.000037957834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018070698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017231158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0140836425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031440957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024625536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07448226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275101560","doi":"","title":"Conference Opening The Management and Resolution of Cross Border Disputes as Canada/U.S. Enter the 21st Century","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Resolution (logic); Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.009548860026014697,"score_gpt":0.2447957324123971,"score_spread":0.23524687238638242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275101560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06228651,0.020812409,0.0016152018,0.12802485,0.008809498,0.0002791011,0.0004343976,0.00014643467,0.77759165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60259444,0.011045826,0.0017233806,0.02529639,0.003131437,0.00018585213,0.0005698432,0.00012214662,0.35533065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99438596,0.00097306847,0.00012877159,0.00030443617,0.0017824225,0.002425439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897821,0.0027746959,0.000531769,0.00038478168,0.002370082,0.0041566156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051922663,0.00032367586,0.00042815477,0.0017310386,0.027190346,0.019389447,0.0023171802,0.009386682,0.03083466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0180192,0.0003200727,0.00042726635,0.0032655303,0.005917273,0.005453212,0.01019166,0.008832858,0.0022531964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016896085,0.00012697327,0.003682074,0.00026197947,0.00001978866,0.0013291892,0.029902115,0.00070339284,0.0010462168,0.21225064,0.66129696,0.08921176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014225815,0.000016559903,0.0030566675,0.00016004317,0.000006369481,0.000058825968,0.02308119,0.0001489455,0.00021485268,0.006225302,0.9669931,0.0000240481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4173142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66282684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5826858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024512608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0489696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8297703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276896539","doi":"","title":"Consumer Arbitration in the Evolving Canadian Landscape","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Legislation; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Compulsory arbitration; Business","score_opus":0.01292715659039607,"score_gpt":0.22671601982122996,"score_spread":0.2137888632308339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276896539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10078972,0.00933909,0.0029753635,0.14350812,0.0004739729,0.000070192196,0.00026653553,0.00008931621,0.74248767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8589179,0.00587235,0.0033023842,0.018858578,0.00017228039,0.000041943626,0.0001173229,0.0000938218,0.11262328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991994,0.0007953601,0.00015758263,0.0009521492,0.0031945044,0.002906236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99377996,0.0012218241,0.0002797163,0.0002846981,0.0030027472,0.0014310094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056637013,0.0002768684,0.00044302183,0.0030126525,0.038321912,0.017971847,0.002457867,0.0043659336,0.014056396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009059771,0.00047422593,0.0005593126,0.0042235563,0.020229556,0.0032122904,0.0059776893,0.005081688,0.0006090332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034697063,0.000018297675,0.0026436495,0.000040343337,0.000009612018,0.0004936077,0.009696632,0.0004140758,0.00021968131,0.92700756,0.03205338,0.027368337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002679825,0.000015688018,0.009169377,0.00021515666,0.000026378055,0.00030611528,0.018304378,0.0014206707,0.00030116912,0.06628331,0.9037911,0.00013981924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18595326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18595326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19683404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9441788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278069200","doi":"","title":"Confidentiality in Judicial Mediation: Lessons from (and for) Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Mediation; Political science; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.028823884951713844,"score_gpt":0.2703055995514613,"score_spread":0.24148171459974743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278069200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16982381,0.02735696,0.0046405285,0.3812429,0.00085823337,0.0001802692,0.00035985876,0.00005100695,0.41548648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494628,0.01037217,0.001417146,0.012233175,0.0001973731,0.0000534722,0.00007717538,0.000042367294,0.026144397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98079073,0.0053272634,0.0004510118,0.0011298959,0.0038897095,0.008411505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95824707,0.023556592,0.0012205932,0.0011702651,0.011298868,0.004506616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017469546,0.00039406793,0.0010251396,0.002010169,0.034485463,0.019793887,0.004444521,0.008863791,0.010247122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054504246,0.00064248126,0.0006536209,0.0049031833,0.027062586,0.007138168,0.0069810958,0.0113302525,0.0004263119],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010212823,0.00008482714,0.008537769,0.0001996542,0.000049381182,0.00094673445,0.0524562,0.0020595382,0.00013157117,0.8528847,0.036796134,0.045751378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027060445,0.00008552138,0.03161014,0.0023472996,0.00023772391,0.0006708577,0.19991584,0.003741494,0.0010829888,0.32209665,0.4376078,0.0003330781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99603707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16999117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16999117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35214102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9626926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278532848","doi":"","title":"Current Socio-Legal Perspectives on Dispute Resolution","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Political science; Legal research; Law; Survey data collection; Survey research; Geography; Sociology; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.018541206307017697,"score_gpt":0.24146461249315934,"score_spread":0.22292340618614165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278532848","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09473827,0.14557838,0.0061031096,0.3041718,0.0013426375,0.00002802865,0.00017998286,0.000024766048,0.447833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8980283,0.077433795,0.0012593871,0.012626445,0.0022993379,0.000050970804,0.00012280152,0.000024347963,0.008154663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.987183,0.0082789445,0.0004731284,0.0007900848,0.0021043667,0.0011705263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781108,0.01474441,0.0025094792,0.00065673597,0.0017065027,0.0022720431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010820061,0.0004089372,0.0005418259,0.006429373,0.010630763,0.014139127,0.0022835028,0.0055204253,0.011458195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013552948,0.00041080682,0.00045018445,0.0076549747,0.04460975,0.014795239,0.006553254,0.0053982474,0.0010076065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015386247,0.00008758176,0.0023771776,0.00017175956,0.000006188568,0.00028940113,0.057618257,0.00015937652,0.000049236278,0.9152644,0.0040307846,0.019930437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001399738,0.000041189738,0.0052705244,0.0007740232,0.000005493814,0.0004691161,0.23872238,0.0002672522,0.000070188165,0.37823078,0.37610406,0.000030991054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075884657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007137725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014139127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0104241995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004101625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07563317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280813928","doi":"","title":"Mediation an increasingly acceptable solution to commercial disputes : the law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Without Prejudice","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Lawyer supported mediation; Dispute mechanism; Political science; Accreditation; Law; Online dispute resolution; Public relations","score_opus":0.021609949591649035,"score_gpt":0.27520756994433637,"score_spread":0.25359762035268735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280813928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063929013,0.033586357,0.05652103,0.29860535,0.0041612894,0.00014505917,0.000051183317,0.00013839833,0.6003984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6703452,0.026683928,0.033666283,0.107701,0.008222483,0.0007617836,0.00011469778,0.00039203095,0.15211257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9671103,0.015077693,0.0014770672,0.0031177145,0.0108029675,0.002414211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98284507,0.00973428,0.0011567172,0.0023343612,0.0028040851,0.001125506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024192149,0.00056771515,0.0010170199,0.0016585625,0.0102786925,0.022348935,0.004219351,0.022078391,0.018611094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046550393,0.00049096334,0.0009726468,0.0016707934,0.052480426,0.02198404,0.016100902,0.01995865,0.0029736538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040342716,0.000008229026,0.000028048991,0.000031635103,0.0000021684061,0.000048022815,0.00082315423,0.00006167527,0.000032137414,0.98925215,0.0055956524,0.004113036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002209986,0.000017674376,0.0000656503,0.0003734383,0.0000072307575,0.00014811762,0.0012149779,0.00029347293,0.000095909214,0.74448407,0.2532588,0.000018620387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0079573635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055565424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024192149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065727253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014197111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12794185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280980506","doi":"","title":"Class Proceedings as a Framework for Employee and Retiree Claims","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Pension; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Substantive law; New class; Political science; Law; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.021696853997028264,"score_gpt":0.24446317835284714,"score_spread":0.2227663243558189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280980506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017253762,0.006727357,0.2172722,0.027659621,0.001724131,0.0009350919,0.0002455454,0.00039453653,0.72778773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7613516,0.0040519475,0.11534346,0.012981691,0.0022242398,0.0018114563,0.00023527798,0.00032031295,0.10168004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95385116,0.01719598,0.002639844,0.004192016,0.016895428,0.005225546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742106,0.015081782,0.0019809718,0.003064089,0.004200449,0.0014621061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038451783,0.001053786,0.00099427,0.006576232,0.014390003,0.023997977,0.007594817,0.017105171,0.008165763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03544112,0.00094951416,0.0018024988,0.0034635537,0.034377158,0.012740683,0.010490289,0.016815925,0.0014546592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016749526,0.000004921124,0.000047160163,0.000008575198,9.601068e-7,0.000046938156,0.00061441684,0.000116294425,0.000031601114,0.9963702,0.00093144336,0.0018259244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036398727,0.00006579189,0.0006203935,0.00060354033,0.000032930802,0.00031076424,0.0025337026,0.0019777126,0.00048634352,0.69761944,0.29558536,0.00012758799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.069608696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06958387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069608696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021510424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03561872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20335484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297472318","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2238386","title":"Unpacking Pandora's Box: Consumer Arbitration Law after Seidel","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Unpacking; Arbitration; Law; Political science; Computer science; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007295693149131467,"score_gpt":0.20989158074006367,"score_spread":0.2025958875909322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297472318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035223834,0.008095283,0.017187743,0.31637892,0.0068773166,0.00010372396,0.00016021462,0.00022423585,0.6157487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5083878,0.0025690303,0.0049365596,0.13263695,0.0029385395,0.00025323953,0.000049606137,0.00028206303,0.34794626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705756,0.0008828537,0.0001503103,0.000644451,0.0007097698,0.00055496104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649304,0.0025645378,0.00010990113,0.00024202644,0.00047873455,0.00011180228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005384813,0.0005495921,0.00075829565,0.0011035585,0.010442947,0.010358753,0.0014559943,0.021697044,0.00814448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012501572,0.000660231,0.0006543619,0.0011566774,0.013457972,0.01194985,0.004123152,0.016678024,0.0012019062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007647568,0.000004938474,0.000051552524,0.00000696469,0.0000020758691,0.000046720048,0.0006783952,0.000047977275,0.000033294556,0.96838343,0.028190775,0.002546186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025263376,0.000023987368,0.00036400466,0.00016786359,0.000020822587,0.00008732375,0.0013520338,0.0009715612,0.00043940707,0.59698844,0.3994966,0.00006273023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04192498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07483754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04192498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005744067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006301999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08336192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298471142","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v4i1.15","title":"Rethinking the Approval of Class Counsel’s Fees in Ontario Class Actions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Res judicata; Settlement (finance); Law; Incentive; Political science; Legislation; Class (philosophy); Economics; Actuarial science; Business; State (computer science); Finance; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07981463738685277,"score_gpt":0.28110422586311246,"score_spread":0.2012895884762597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298471142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8764447,0.0027700276,0.002494146,0.012957526,0.00014846904,0.0003816597,0.00059614395,0.00005666787,0.10415057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98993087,0.00067597115,0.0012959297,0.0010794924,0.00004839938,0.000037050566,0.000101635436,0.000013693971,0.006816869],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9667226,0.0031761427,0.0015523417,0.0014387195,0.02265239,0.0044578123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9466208,0.023387292,0.008612464,0.001795681,0.017791336,0.0017924609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016912527,0.00018250316,0.00044020597,0.0060333307,0.0066211177,0.0062431195,0.002440872,0.0018704783,0.0021481356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08465436,0.00041633967,0.00042840667,0.0049031507,0.0043349583,0.0014554856,0.0017937296,0.0015003306,0.00021702173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002790259,0.00017303729,0.47259194,0.00052936235,0.00015315964,0.0025011566,0.054647025,0.006229684,0.006234781,0.14411594,0.04558137,0.2669635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005172565,0.00010664144,0.8204151,0.0003117055,0.00012460681,0.00028921393,0.017014379,0.0043204245,0.0026267187,0.0038945705,0.15070589,0.0001390002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92590517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97571576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07409483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07075203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.080682404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5133443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299388231","doi":"","title":"Et s’il était possible d’obtenir justice en ligne ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Research Unit on Children's Psychosocial Maladjustment; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ligne; Art","score_opus":0.007754558220605337,"score_gpt":0.18553259377578343,"score_spread":0.1777780355551781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299388231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027897997,0.0076237065,0.049094763,0.35911283,0.0038244447,0.00012698078,0.00015838245,0.0002507106,0.5519102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6903519,0.007506011,0.024739608,0.066275194,0.0024279547,0.000284544,0.00023574839,0.00064155215,0.20753746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828568,0.0065675047,0.000520001,0.0024009752,0.004699947,0.0029547615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823054,0.0073788427,0.0014241658,0.0027983394,0.0039354446,0.0021577622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015339846,0.00066296116,0.0008679971,0.0016073197,0.015524936,0.027683731,0.0028740966,0.013193586,0.03349762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03564649,0.0005059521,0.001080918,0.0015646277,0.03243948,0.04207362,0.011538152,0.01875284,0.0085013015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025813537,0.000042693802,0.0008331755,0.0001104481,0.000022864859,0.00032264122,0.011023302,0.00022606722,0.00029177868,0.93565786,0.02227032,0.029172994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015122426,0.00003896896,0.0009880383,0.00066377374,0.000020642525,0.0004564903,0.0332093,0.0005583215,0.00066800026,0.49445045,0.4688634,0.000067522786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013115925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017849976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03349762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012132662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112060726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2309075897","doi":"","title":"A Summary of the American Bar Association’s (ABA) Jurisdiction in Cyberspace Project : “Achieving Legal and Business Order in Cyberspace : A Report on Global Jurisdiction Issues Created by the Internet”","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Jurisdiction; Political science; Humanities; Ligne; The Internet; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.004632878019241105,"score_gpt":0.1926883853095985,"score_spread":0.1880555072903574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2309075897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008438666,0.13749717,0.033556454,0.14969128,0.030155968,0.004135487,0.029574322,0.0021602365,0.60479033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05467541,0.24910225,0.05954363,0.054608475,0.010736358,0.0041621802,0.050836384,0.0015055338,0.51482975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875038,0.0023366788,0.0012066998,0.0009002116,0.0070313485,0.0010211694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847937,0.0031745567,0.00099724,0.0005497197,0.009249789,0.0012349499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011919104,0.0014791419,0.0007516297,0.008755671,0.0042148074,0.011775322,0.002647675,0.00555961,0.024256276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01822673,0.00080839015,0.0013802823,0.009899419,0.0016019776,0.0058363355,0.003382277,0.0044781077,0.012075109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035824993,0.0001569792,0.0009735485,0.0023054355,0.000026328775,0.00017670784,0.0016946034,0.00052701304,0.0007501768,0.05146257,0.83929545,0.10259539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058135247,0.000041493553,0.0018054532,0.0008162641,0.000014515492,0.000041408755,0.00065948593,0.00006980665,0.0003403417,0.0020446673,0.99412847,0.0000323305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06747127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0700745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06747127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00797153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027297426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13415706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312058398","doi":"","title":"Online Dispute Resolution and Autism Spectrum Disorder: Levelling the Playing Field in Disputes Involving Autistic Parties","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Online dispute resolution; Arbitration; Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Mediation; Negotiation; Psychology; Nonverbal communication; Dispute mechanism; Accommodation; Social psychology; Process (computing); Public relations; Internet privacy; Computer science; Political science; Law; Communication","score_opus":0.06684593786800738,"score_gpt":0.2741599261634583,"score_spread":0.20731398829545092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312058398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863599,0.00041386898,0.0006018448,0.0012359045,0.000014640669,0.000022520591,0.000015560257,0.000010083671,0.011325636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984617,0.00016946123,0.0005940629,0.00011195748,0.000009028158,0.000019216752,0.00001554274,0.000002546329,0.0006164113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963295,0.0016917975,0.0003530726,0.0003877402,0.0008463373,0.00039153354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904218,0.00470553,0.003426777,0.00030555524,0.00042100702,0.0007193116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026505261,0.00024751332,0.00035209843,0.0025224786,0.003860856,0.002236765,0.0008577654,0.0017974235,0.0035116335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0158267,0.00026188703,0.00027717953,0.001312872,0.00558616,0.0019106069,0.003887666,0.0014089448,0.00025727955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005126286,0.00096753077,0.62542856,0.0005206794,0.00007464056,0.055980567,0.17042722,0.00083784567,0.0036195884,0.025005355,0.0038335035,0.112791896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006523052,0.0003451777,0.61691624,0.00045932425,0.00006467711,0.10929415,0.23366125,0.0024540504,0.0008909576,0.025904685,0.009867585,0.00007670443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010448965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015423407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010448965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018449769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012382028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020776272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315960087","doi":"10.2966/scrip.090112.1","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada and Emerging Technologies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SCRIPTed A Journal of Law Technology & Society","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.011450191765496614,"score_gpt":0.22036510712293456,"score_spread":0.20891491535743795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315960087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04396712,0.010230189,0.0020603521,0.25734556,0.0037240153,0.00026251058,0.0016109096,0.000108724154,0.6806907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4589736,0.0032633618,0.0019548293,0.13187706,0.0013408515,0.00021480855,0.00034204058,0.00021163782,0.4018217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98498034,0.0012101242,0.00039208605,0.0015433122,0.0052035907,0.006670543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98766476,0.003988623,0.00038238635,0.00053537905,0.005293176,0.0021356791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068461117,0.0008397911,0.0011663784,0.0026144958,0.042958826,0.027034951,0.0042484943,0.028315531,0.014440671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02214885,0.001141246,0.0012405851,0.0034016345,0.015705692,0.0050982414,0.003860388,0.026608344,0.0011695498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003178574,0.000029915007,0.0010733758,0.000029903258,0.000023558077,0.00030546763,0.002340118,0.00028788703,0.00015306925,0.8682273,0.12316224,0.004335406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011059477,0.000030146191,0.006791143,0.0005359821,0.0001533899,0.00012333185,0.0064178375,0.0014177646,0.0006988711,0.12999037,0.8534619,0.0002686798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9838933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13925584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13925584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27589992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320706894","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i2.393","title":"… and Yet so Far? The Utility of the Cy Près Doctrine in Class Proceedings Against the Crown","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Class action; Settlement (finance); Political science; Appeal; Law; Legislation; Economics; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.03258443076726511,"score_gpt":0.2500400612930387,"score_spread":0.21745563052577357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320706894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057509955,0.0041551,0.023997316,0.10216332,0.0017175105,0.00008471909,0.000031701922,0.000060115235,0.8102802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9155816,0.0016088068,0.0033555685,0.014021901,0.00080055464,0.00008516157,0.000015346935,0.00004326872,0.06448768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99443686,0.0016703497,0.00014882434,0.0008858467,0.0020282571,0.00082989584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99616146,0.0019090441,0.00035625984,0.00040502977,0.00094016735,0.0002280301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007356122,0.00024090227,0.00032230528,0.0007940389,0.009651046,0.009958124,0.0014270195,0.0048933006,0.0037822474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014364131,0.00020852928,0.00039324723,0.0007479456,0.037100382,0.007979679,0.004283619,0.010097605,0.00058975234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023352814,0.0000016367339,0.000120109726,0.0000069436883,0.0000012230323,0.000031735406,0.0021526522,0.000038264625,0.000044373264,0.99266523,0.0019536726,0.0029818374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014530949,0.00004378515,0.0018862883,0.0003365765,0.000021192023,0.000133059,0.018061196,0.00059892284,0.0011460638,0.57578003,0.40192547,0.000052877065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070192546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07454378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9298074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009145982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012740406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13956797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329223241","doi":"10.1017/s1598240800006792","title":"<i>Troubled Apologies Among Japan, Korea, and the United States.</i> By Alexis Dudden. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008. 167 Pp. $40.00 (Cloth).","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of East Asian Studies","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic history; History","score_opus":0.025683586425282838,"score_gpt":0.226194731542858,"score_spread":0.20051114511757515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329223241","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04614302,0.41026998,0.0002841877,0.34839678,0.011749296,0.0000476286,0.0017793895,0.00014713826,0.18118261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4824716,0.19408281,0.00049508695,0.026129983,0.0047252956,0.00008402023,0.0012466295,0.00015086994,0.29061374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965966,0.00009187591,0.000026638561,0.000035370012,0.00011394291,0.000072430244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826366,0.0005636159,0.0005345931,0.000042824526,0.0002896557,0.00030576618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007402816,0.00043702414,0.00026158706,0.0012848758,0.0028609354,0.002208348,0.0006148234,0.0013884373,0.019642351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038545523,0.00028485153,0.00014680624,0.0025083644,0.0015896746,0.003779553,0.0014503249,0.0018277324,0.0026142234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017796532,0.000011617458,0.0018782936,0.00012625018,0.0000057911643,0.00012512464,0.011151133,0.000010228599,0.0000481918,0.0041573597,0.95836836,0.024099803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000849084,0.000020870788,0.045672994,0.0010471238,0.000011070404,0.0006914778,0.054285333,0.000048971502,0.0001144841,0.0023400283,0.89573675,0.000022424616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03171994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0977035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03171994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017953388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015012773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06571025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341316884","doi":"","title":"La Cyber Diffusion Des Documents De La Cour: Dans La Quête D’Un Juste Équilibre Pour Assurer L’Accès À La Justice Dans L’Ère Numérique ('Purposively' Posting Court Documents Online: Striking a Balance with an Eye Towards Protecting Access to Justice in the Digital Age Post Ab v Bragg)","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008707218531947558,"score_gpt":0.27079089548114627,"score_spread":0.2620836769491987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341316884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06387298,0.009759344,0.015304797,0.24541143,0.0016619879,0.000062603336,0.0001846513,0.00014575658,0.6635965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90408534,0.004196649,0.0037341951,0.014334975,0.0015930058,0.00008142444,0.000060790553,0.00022480829,0.07168882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890491,0.003809198,0.00064605504,0.0014753413,0.0037079433,0.0013123341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9714633,0.017509324,0.0027267009,0.003432484,0.0030450125,0.0018231366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010936719,0.0003438006,0.0004789168,0.0029470846,0.010166289,0.050073575,0.0015384518,0.010553323,0.016086224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041568965,0.0004909367,0.00045409036,0.0030458895,0.042090505,0.0480507,0.011469706,0.010155527,0.002096641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013310267,0.000008403411,0.0004722769,0.00002787852,0.000004070963,0.00009025132,0.006753935,0.000046827437,0.00012238341,0.97522074,0.0067434637,0.0104965195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020876836,0.000025974112,0.001614616,0.0003956834,0.000018648298,0.00042577193,0.013098512,0.00032382127,0.0011414629,0.4964758,0.48641148,0.000047281377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01331729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010748889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050073575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008187027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00917197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059401333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346138769","doi":"","title":"A Critical Reappraisal of Class Action Settlement Procedure in Search of a New Standard of Fairness","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Settlement (finance); Context (archaeology); Human settlement; Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Legislature; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Geography; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01975198680626534,"score_gpt":0.31591498712805166,"score_spread":0.29616300032178633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346138769","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016629377,0.015554649,0.32970092,0.46626028,0.016995002,0.0010006296,0.00007922946,0.00033348182,0.15344642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5901937,0.0065547307,0.2471395,0.09093723,0.0141559495,0.0019012268,0.000072108254,0.00028066762,0.048764817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.867145,0.068028964,0.011462851,0.010041717,0.03928593,0.00403558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87622607,0.0789412,0.005251435,0.009389109,0.028885303,0.001306948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12566073,0.0006592473,0.001360505,0.0041433326,0.011762806,0.019007893,0.00493929,0.014863845,0.0015394555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15573467,0.0008495783,0.0011515964,0.0018720288,0.055906564,0.01591671,0.005291027,0.026425276,0.0008095017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000085587735,0.00001075868,0.00008408227,0.00004632415,0.0000037609952,0.000065992455,0.0039575202,0.00013986214,0.00017717246,0.98017657,0.0061759963,0.00915336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032121457,0.000065928936,0.00060513936,0.0006516579,0.000024913648,0.0002136395,0.0031430617,0.00207038,0.0013563983,0.7398269,0.25191098,0.00009887106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071179834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008902994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12566073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014590626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023849932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66456544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2357475284","doi":"","title":"The Third-party Mediation Mechanism of Financial Consumer Dispute in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Canada and Enlightenment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"West China Finance","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Enlightenment; Dispute resolution; Dispute mechanism; China; Mechanism (biology); Alternative dispute resolution; Settlement (finance); Online dispute resolution; Arbitration; Third party; Business; Dispute board; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Finance; Economics; Computer science; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.0038581230705240993,"score_gpt":0.1727266696703448,"score_spread":0.1688685465998207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2357475284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84332496,0.0019774127,0.003882818,0.0061940565,0.00008801523,0.00025653114,0.00015731672,0.000039513325,0.14407945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884481,0.00035054784,0.00042930077,0.000135638,0.000006102106,0.00003167306,0.000033869677,0.0000037284176,0.010560948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704677,0.00045726087,0.000118671254,0.0001890417,0.00073224877,0.0014560866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997891,0.0005357305,0.00036737122,0.0001740447,0.0006339959,0.0003978968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018379373,0.00025178673,0.00025164222,0.0015293173,0.0091132885,0.004280927,0.0011045582,0.0015287226,0.00517034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045769527,0.00024612065,0.0005339147,0.0018065193,0.0046926048,0.001973978,0.0022915592,0.0015794819,0.00019210987],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003233799,0.0001526265,0.06567729,0.00018552152,0.000080161735,0.008868536,0.06390311,0.0036879936,0.0012034832,0.80376244,0.013298592,0.03885686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042139608,0.00019851918,0.26701033,0.00065085106,0.00044917353,0.005786667,0.20445669,0.034190167,0.008652374,0.12738217,0.3502058,0.00059586973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8655446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7959698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13445538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03261256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037074685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2704944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2365164988","doi":"","title":"Investigation and Inspiration of Extraterritorial Judicial Accountability System──Taking the United States, Canada, Australia, Germany, France and Japan as the Samples","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hunan Police Academy","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Judicial review; Political science; Credibility; Judicial independence; Judicial activism; Economic Justice; China; Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.0387203964212356,"score_gpt":0.27339044300723325,"score_spread":0.23467004658599766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2365164988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7794182,0.002084884,0.0064819516,0.008416294,0.00019608326,0.00017553086,0.00021334426,0.000054760254,0.20295905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943058,0.0003936401,0.0011281193,0.00044720096,0.000029715453,0.000016717573,0.000054501324,0.0000061117257,0.0036183128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945221,0.001532443,0.00033304704,0.00061258534,0.0019815671,0.0010183224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98941165,0.003029238,0.0020981377,0.0008360657,0.003632975,0.0009919222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052368687,0.00015202301,0.00015296425,0.0038733056,0.0047849244,0.0044646547,0.00073231873,0.0006381859,0.002402502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010342033,0.00019211628,0.00019312033,0.0027784386,0.0037984177,0.0028814152,0.0018897842,0.0013580777,0.0001267947],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061147526,0.00011482252,0.22428359,0.00019734654,0.000034226447,0.0011195946,0.03002646,0.0005920972,0.001253002,0.60857064,0.010828207,0.12291883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043698103,0.00015795245,0.6497403,0.00068979873,0.00011730396,0.0011613609,0.058697235,0.006847568,0.004816219,0.07735257,0.2002467,0.00012933867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057187043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10814068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.942813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007645169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014162583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11370838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2371204571","doi":"","title":"Discussing on the Causes and Countermeasures of Seed Disputes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seed","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.01829989726587747,"score_gpt":0.2270458106138828,"score_spread":0.20874591334800532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2371204571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19105197,0.017340519,0.017178675,0.2479894,0.0028561861,0.00025845066,0.00013107363,0.00008155485,0.5231122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9475527,0.0031167546,0.0019870172,0.010197103,0.00059190416,0.00004515812,0.00003628938,0.0000186783,0.036454465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966691,0.0012260857,0.0001424806,0.00027369987,0.0010942686,0.00059444504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98353946,0.011602853,0.0023886357,0.0006237731,0.0014678871,0.00037730052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056196977,0.00023382284,0.0002631861,0.0018147919,0.0051429523,0.004916775,0.0013927069,0.00561729,0.0061796014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021943444,0.00018773029,0.00044607845,0.0016749159,0.0056966655,0.0032260076,0.0013794506,0.004894515,0.00032474936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020472444,0.000043456173,0.00578796,0.0000776637,0.000011933695,0.00062749296,0.0054598884,0.00043185853,0.00038994505,0.9469912,0.018433861,0.021724254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067545516,0.00010113139,0.02728936,0.0007460094,0.00007414965,0.0008106266,0.028334862,0.003375077,0.004312121,0.4224687,0.5123629,0.00005744312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069119637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013134281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069119637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039106198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048635225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029720187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2382007721","doi":"","title":"On the Improvement of Simple Procedures of Chinese Lawsuit","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Central China Normal University","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Prairie Improvement Network","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Simple (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Civil procedure; Economic Justice; Computer science; Law and economics; Law; Management science; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Mathematics; Political science; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.007787753266658113,"score_gpt":0.1792117901674709,"score_spread":0.1714240369008128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2382007721","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19732296,0.007642064,0.47736427,0.016606165,0.0009185776,0.0039010763,0.0002990869,0.0015579836,0.29438773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.857592,0.0042881393,0.11596289,0.0014318246,0.00047716356,0.00076088385,0.00023686864,0.0001096952,0.019140547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98500025,0.005637117,0.0014059433,0.0012809491,0.005543533,0.0011321511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99110305,0.003342791,0.0011003132,0.0013779213,0.0027748826,0.00030107494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01623456,0.0005889163,0.0004564921,0.003982234,0.0037859825,0.0040269988,0.0017021099,0.001443714,0.005581349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024152474,0.00038696616,0.0008746952,0.002829037,0.005105025,0.0067848787,0.0041115712,0.002007519,0.00074692565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009629876,0.00018278722,0.0047854185,0.0006684867,0.000035306366,0.00027522692,0.0039590364,0.0063544884,0.0033139475,0.6153555,0.008319968,0.35665345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004063729,0.001098203,0.040359706,0.0014660312,0.0004921886,0.0012032804,0.00469443,0.079991125,0.022584468,0.48533154,0.36193082,0.000441846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018682327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011374522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018682327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005061297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014714041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08585757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W23823880","doi":"10.17269/cjph.104.3739","title":"Why Complaints Become Disputes: What Factors Encourage Dispute Development","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Dispute mechanism; Dispute resolution; Public relations; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Alternative dispute resolution; Economics","score_opus":0.01783152075128556,"score_gpt":0.2153252105870164,"score_spread":0.19749368983573085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W23823880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.817142,0.0019633842,0.004360595,0.07151757,0.00048211255,0.00038575387,0.00026246576,0.00017417221,0.10371203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993736,0.00048492954,0.00080665934,0.0016104095,0.00014553271,0.000030390933,0.000054500753,0.0000352802,0.0030962352],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98080057,0.006871694,0.0015015779,0.001139921,0.0048935884,0.004792528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8311545,0.07582018,0.062082097,0.005044029,0.016797733,0.009101437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013671378,0.0002902646,0.00044212362,0.0021533044,0.008251728,0.011158526,0.0020337908,0.0041127447,0.015722426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15471323,0.00049784826,0.00062856503,0.0025819023,0.005466329,0.0075133042,0.0039596832,0.004016927,0.0015849053],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033717032,0.0011289942,0.6347642,0.00078252604,0.00012564458,0.0049482905,0.15063274,0.00069113745,0.0013372737,0.05240191,0.045835316,0.10701483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105008316,0.00016041982,0.31638157,0.0011068439,0.0000819857,0.002982928,0.53177637,0.002084988,0.0011497223,0.03962367,0.104378864,0.00016771033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033768464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03136783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033768464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060598855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010779822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07230204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2392706136","doi":"","title":"Mediation Mechanism of Financial Consumer Protection in SFTZ","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Business Research","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Business; Consumer protection; Legislation; China; Dispute resolution; Mechanism (biology); Order (exchange); Alternative dispute resolution; Consumer Protection Act; Law and economics; Marketing; Finance; Commerce; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.10357990985843901,"score_gpt":0.3476251895761625,"score_spread":0.2440452797177235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2392706136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14673181,0.002838229,0.11113305,0.018307447,0.0007813881,0.00067452947,0.00035144883,0.0005486784,0.7186335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93584764,0.0007346948,0.007581261,0.0011034947,0.00021714847,0.00022796585,0.000097043056,0.000038184502,0.054152526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932974,0.0018694248,0.0003815478,0.00091539166,0.0019843164,0.0015519123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99514467,0.0019111803,0.0006450465,0.00089346746,0.001111796,0.00029387043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049939537,0.00042067425,0.0004990101,0.0023529418,0.0041860943,0.004563802,0.0016307599,0.0043351683,0.02427996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013108311,0.0003256183,0.0012143938,0.0012209888,0.005183973,0.0054181996,0.004932412,0.003372443,0.002242054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050878556,0.00003270456,0.0012643972,0.00007045293,0.000017810897,0.00095658767,0.002538952,0.00032204695,0.0009212397,0.9803285,0.0031748419,0.010321609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017062554,0.00009136245,0.0033510209,0.00027456626,0.00010413829,0.00209544,0.0034138502,0.0074191918,0.00520878,0.841559,0.13620637,0.00010561816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052418243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021483102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02427996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031904397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003964789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08122456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2415891566","doi":"","title":"How Much is Too Much? Contingency Fees in Class Actions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Contingency; Class (philosophy); Legislation; Work (physics); Law; Law and economics; Settlement (finance); Actuarial science; Human settlement; Economics; Political science; Business; Computer science; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.01308093064130115,"score_gpt":0.22758318304557318,"score_spread":0.21450225240427204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2415891566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16784956,0.007770652,0.014650368,0.18311311,0.0012429586,0.00012945393,0.000096887656,0.00006720889,0.62507975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834304,0.0008175654,0.0007603183,0.006070919,0.0003729933,0.00003125017,0.000011164354,0.000014954238,0.008490317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98230493,0.0058288057,0.00079916464,0.0013813239,0.006439041,0.003246621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98411393,0.009308046,0.0022742955,0.0010668597,0.0014928301,0.0017440482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010093297,0.00022115622,0.0004976167,0.001651897,0.008336275,0.013497978,0.0016093748,0.008367877,0.007528716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039767303,0.00027595813,0.00043177142,0.001250266,0.027229162,0.012370716,0.0062313736,0.007436287,0.0006352312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014349427,0.000033569337,0.0025040708,0.000019475914,0.000006637737,0.00014559928,0.0031062455,0.0002137672,0.00009124239,0.9665837,0.0071910038,0.020090321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046121073,0.00006208554,0.012311939,0.0003947613,0.0000392622,0.00047243838,0.01690562,0.0009860905,0.00050196244,0.84079814,0.12741031,0.00007128332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030845653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03675184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030845653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01237645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008060642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089797795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2418691867","doi":"","title":"On the Net: Litigation online","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Net (polyhedron); World Wide Web; Data science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.008236444914162703,"score_gpt":0.2069091157145216,"score_spread":0.1986726708003589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2418691867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010239121,0.002443554,0.00064634724,0.05465952,0.0053001526,0.000039876326,0.0008004392,0.0007660783,0.9343201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018748043,0.0024457301,0.00060028926,0.021848185,0.007376537,0.000053366875,0.0008568655,0.00051894085,0.947552],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810433,0.00025522168,0.000075727825,0.00007945765,0.0011643814,0.00032091292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99420196,0.0025737009,0.00031789523,0.000467061,0.0011076678,0.0013316831],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021086491,0.0006299729,0.0006036616,0.002344379,0.0072615505,0.012965925,0.00137415,0.0102035245,0.47821498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01457885,0.00057713763,0.0004059509,0.0020543153,0.0017571194,0.011315136,0.0039439998,0.0049921414,0.16938038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010859155,0.000015615517,0.00008478111,0.0000100724665,0.0000012033908,0.00005432437,0.000039684106,0.00002286645,0.0000362083,0.010466434,0.9747635,0.014494431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018681512,0.000010345948,0.0006758963,0.000098835284,0.000004936884,0.00008620049,0.0002436395,0.0002533438,0.00010059326,0.013559663,0.9849309,0.000016923936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019617528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061439995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98038244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035327913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057346304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.744263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2423013223","doi":"10.1177/1473779516657745","title":"Evolution, revolution and culture shift","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Settlement (finance); Economic Justice; Adversarial system; Law; Political science; Process (computing); Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.01663805972798435,"score_gpt":0.25173558595008605,"score_spread":0.2350975262221017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2423013223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44404447,0.01276666,0.0028754731,0.09338532,0.0008736129,0.00008295183,0.00022691,0.00008306115,0.4456616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700041,0.0032477523,0.0008279454,0.0054641613,0.00015072436,0.000020393054,0.000058680955,0.000045074536,0.020181168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995048,0.0012343971,0.00017455939,0.0008322936,0.0012780896,0.0014326072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949537,0.0010283141,0.0004910212,0.00060519966,0.001755402,0.0011662961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005742161,0.00021620694,0.0004770638,0.002365452,0.010811751,0.010498455,0.0011746136,0.0018700485,0.0046436973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062717535,0.000235719,0.00027757327,0.0025951897,0.03545729,0.0037282186,0.004187687,0.00380487,0.0005259672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049279275,0.000052667347,0.0044601248,0.00007124329,0.000011366902,0.00025651194,0.082431845,0.00018443364,0.0005390755,0.85532415,0.009405079,0.047214158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026150792,0.00006799177,0.022485174,0.00027686555,0.000014821021,0.00027321416,0.06672492,0.00034481555,0.00060280046,0.06066166,0.84845024,0.00007134507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4073566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41207317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4073566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035007246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022959713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80997103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463460408","doi":"","title":"Talking it out: Mandatory mediation in Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Society Journal: the official journal of the Law Society of New South Wales","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Business; Political science; Internet privacy; Psychology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.02658600687833978,"score_gpt":0.23053131277819205,"score_spread":0.20394530589985227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2463460408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79619753,0.0013990167,0.00094484293,0.049625214,0.00025525692,0.0002473728,0.00049946096,0.000048219837,0.15078318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9217232,0.00076231774,0.000631392,0.004412491,0.000037732316,0.000083706735,0.00011448406,0.000030287501,0.07220459],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994369,0.00090213807,0.00018175699,0.00044679455,0.0013651015,0.0027353438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914746,0.0018931078,0.0009033144,0.0005143032,0.0022924973,0.0029221496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037961414,0.00018080988,0.00037815145,0.0006372762,0.035056394,0.0051045576,0.0020205998,0.0032858597,0.011442866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011267481,0.00056376343,0.0004493253,0.0020740307,0.0049936697,0.0025681367,0.005138019,0.0034719952,0.00058555865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009188538,0.00042102506,0.16059907,0.0006798436,0.00013842044,0.013308032,0.42658365,0.0011368523,0.0035959366,0.2103788,0.096169695,0.08606978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013101134,0.00021515344,0.19744396,0.00043648633,0.00011602713,0.001475683,0.3616943,0.0014455579,0.0013781276,0.01049011,0.42494285,0.00023077046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98378974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99752647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09461582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09461582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19598968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.686489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473080226","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2005.11421452","title":"Statutory Limitation Periods and the Traditional Representative Action Procedure","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statutory law; Action (physics); Order (exchange); Federal court; Political science; Commonwealth; Statutory interpretation; High Court; Business; Supreme court","score_opus":0.04205754940978738,"score_gpt":0.24605602946236166,"score_spread":0.2039984800525743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2473080226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017329706,0.0017993627,0.34729552,0.0068057035,0.0008587616,0.0005776039,0.00029610566,0.00042080245,0.6246165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57944715,0.0019110908,0.23410322,0.007630043,0.0014901335,0.0027197392,0.0004418662,0.00032156476,0.17193522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98112327,0.006941918,0.0012773159,0.0027546787,0.006698519,0.0012043754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98429835,0.009248584,0.0008953389,0.0036055106,0.0017176806,0.00023460889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020084726,0.0005497655,0.00062469643,0.0018488828,0.0027805336,0.005343175,0.002994867,0.004936828,0.014081947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03209999,0.0008184478,0.00076855836,0.0023233437,0.011605318,0.008704778,0.0034344592,0.0063109756,0.00575494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012161002,0.000007764152,0.000042702224,0.000013488785,0.0000016518476,0.000024173927,0.00026189187,0.00011559249,0.00011974799,0.9890491,0.0020943256,0.0082573695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000422924,0.000047556878,0.0002798922,0.00011701027,0.000012899829,0.000165855,0.00014446166,0.0022258407,0.00087490556,0.89019626,0.10586103,0.000032001582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021599014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020019086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020084726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002613857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004705964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10621947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476111539","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-18135-6","title":"New Developments in Civil and Commercial Mediation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Ius comparatum","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.034655690811130756,"score_gpt":0.25266152628885585,"score_spread":0.2180058354777251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476111539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006945859,0.06554581,0.0040577417,0.01062307,0.0035179195,0.00002292481,0.000030457104,0.000057060915,0.9154504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05406331,0.06325301,0.0058552045,0.006500818,0.008764379,0.00014556704,0.00016665614,0.00020906013,0.861042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976871,0.0008021431,0.000079547615,0.00019146684,0.001074024,0.00016578057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985055,0.00093842275,0.000065673696,0.00018436112,0.00020994149,0.00009606341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027861837,0.00067852344,0.00075586146,0.0023215495,0.002956026,0.010946007,0.0020204093,0.0038748588,0.05314044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049037044,0.00036703158,0.00048163824,0.0042359177,0.0076896227,0.0136607345,0.0036772664,0.00589223,0.006549449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042525185,0.000015777016,0.000016181668,0.000058428235,0.0000011976925,0.000015478163,0.00030352653,0.00007019136,0.000024846118,0.92035186,0.044198982,0.03493922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004033129,0.0000067109954,0.00008242319,0.00013418637,0.0000016164771,0.00005279553,0.00030265865,0.00014929382,0.000036446654,0.20214361,0.7970817,0.0000046550654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004228661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012008035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05314044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005618502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040649553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17777246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2506866618","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316534205.018","title":"A proposed model code of conduct for mediators","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code of conduct; Ethical code; Code (set theory); Product (mathematics); Political science; Computer science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.0416719815234027,"score_gpt":0.28830819807267927,"score_spread":0.24663621654927656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2506866618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010307184,0.00047951806,0.2693606,0.051994838,0.0011869789,0.0038450176,0.0011765455,0.00050185487,0.6611475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4242975,0.0011693912,0.36541143,0.015459176,0.0008979855,0.009170232,0.0024898692,0.00032471336,0.18077967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9399567,0.028674714,0.0040381653,0.00479689,0.017994953,0.0045385975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9172901,0.024301765,0.00424361,0.008746542,0.03954364,0.005874307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032253895,0.0008295541,0.0006341829,0.0035087115,0.008160115,0.017417071,0.005069773,0.011688895,0.02183372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07718436,0.0007151322,0.001129601,0.0036121705,0.01055753,0.010684823,0.0065198825,0.0066820495,0.0076276893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000085005395,0.000027254935,0.00039158534,0.00003333757,0.0000021936376,0.000079441095,0.0007410942,0.00055032125,0.000055677898,0.9827928,0.010255351,0.0050623924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008683017,0.000060799255,0.00082278106,0.00063789455,0.000021192782,0.00053313747,0.0023141666,0.0073297946,0.00047925915,0.6466903,0.34093544,0.00008835338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022814145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018489944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032253895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014383708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05544188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17057693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W252455294","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2173752","title":"The New Old Lawyer: How Lawyers Have Adapted to Mediation to Preserve Their Power, Income, and Identity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Identity (music); Power (physics); Law; Political science; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.014199725094456656,"score_gpt":0.22825714559184954,"score_spread":0.21405742049739288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W252455294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42133525,0.005257198,0.018152185,0.19857259,0.0016736309,0.000089674126,0.000038565784,0.00018686484,0.35469407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9497098,0.0007422614,0.0026227161,0.008986715,0.00018854224,0.000025749578,0.000012668458,0.000104406805,0.03760721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99114484,0.005103667,0.00016415186,0.0009671213,0.0010026954,0.0016176165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920433,0.0037115596,0.0006607455,0.0010786364,0.0008446983,0.0016610434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01245723,0.00018714873,0.00032551808,0.0010576214,0.017322995,0.021890424,0.0026101873,0.006545035,0.016909095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028554386,0.00036116078,0.00034276777,0.0009800326,0.03490507,0.015225125,0.009044963,0.009851252,0.0012958292],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006741829,0.00020991023,0.005163269,0.000054780423,0.000022764621,0.00080945936,0.30456018,0.00016938387,0.00079560414,0.60011536,0.01773146,0.07030035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004635798,0.00009901811,0.006195769,0.0002557991,0.00003057251,0.00077522226,0.24768686,0.00066724536,0.0007867067,0.1673814,0.575978,0.00009704608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011663604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031085579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021890424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006299846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006878655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065880954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W252615043","doi":"","title":"Class Actions in Canada: 2005 State of the Union: Growing, Expanding, and Developing","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Plaintiff; Legislation; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.01415921890431619,"score_gpt":0.21302251372267741,"score_spread":0.19886329481836124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W252615043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13066503,0.073641196,0.0029056035,0.0872107,0.0024354726,0.0006276669,0.006959347,0.0005964402,0.69495857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.630061,0.05822792,0.005862891,0.02828412,0.0005992514,0.00019528122,0.0046223947,0.0002055837,0.2719416],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899906,0.00022110717,0.0002323153,0.0005165084,0.0066095856,0.0024298304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916481,0.0006392216,0.0006172118,0.00013811722,0.004608061,0.0023492426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026968587,0.00036360812,0.00035875133,0.004572579,0.014496057,0.013077141,0.0024796568,0.0032194776,0.0075568585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070030657,0.00055966264,0.00067173666,0.006443815,0.004022522,0.0015744682,0.0024868525,0.00359481,0.00077141414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089584995,0.00015313811,0.04403226,0.0008723408,0.000058004367,0.0012897466,0.010003209,0.0014190074,0.0010976817,0.23239763,0.40737298,0.3012144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010963452,0.000021148053,0.060120337,0.0005203842,0.00003943263,0.0001641496,0.004887704,0.00044414419,0.000436752,0.0018626621,0.9314192,0.00007312709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20277396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20277396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36126086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9246692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528829189","doi":"","title":"Bending in the Breeze: American Class Actions in the Twenty-First Century","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Miller; Plaintiff; Class (philosophy); Demise; Action (physics); Face (sociological concept); Enthusiasm; Law; History; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social science; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.019069574865048417,"score_gpt":0.25001547608920294,"score_spread":0.2309459012241545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528829189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13041563,0.048822273,0.0014722059,0.33492187,0.0030410036,0.000018798013,0.00006056054,0.000052006533,0.48119572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7750766,0.008146455,0.0007476623,0.08599928,0.0015916562,0.000044731532,0.000026982498,0.0000461461,0.1283205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996418,0.00089192035,0.000085240965,0.00045545932,0.001103326,0.0010459513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977864,0.0007816779,0.0003012344,0.00011989031,0.00035334402,0.0006572897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00403126,0.00020098843,0.00022764291,0.0011108869,0.019364065,0.011149206,0.00094017055,0.007315568,0.0040213303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045470116,0.00026448737,0.00026987228,0.0010544444,0.01881901,0.006203681,0.0036126939,0.010904996,0.0005263439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012649349,0.00004215939,0.0012421286,0.000021691903,0.0000038560825,0.00016716028,0.029615775,0.00004815378,0.00015065007,0.9075661,0.04221447,0.018915217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064168044,0.000022784374,0.00360391,0.00014331884,0.0000054649754,0.00014329617,0.009613814,0.000090401096,0.00016585877,0.049809918,0.9363545,0.000040379007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05834043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11019435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05834043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011745353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007023738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116001725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529163734","doi":"","title":"Gli Avvocati e le nuove forme di ADR: il diritto collaborativo","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UnissResearch (Università degli Studi di Sassari)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Mediation; Cornerstone; Political science; Law; Commit; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Sociology; Computer science; Legislation; Geography","score_opus":0.05908126074027129,"score_gpt":0.274905910526121,"score_spread":0.21582464978584973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529163734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016185777,0.075962216,0.054291166,0.13550127,0.005905142,0.00024084774,0.00022498409,0.00045647068,0.7112322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64208114,0.06069704,0.06205441,0.025497131,0.0070777023,0.0008146991,0.00045909238,0.00062532496,0.20069347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97216684,0.014768437,0.00095349364,0.0031246834,0.0069922716,0.001994299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878804,0.004923282,0.00092141354,0.0030870538,0.0018521298,0.0013358659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0148772,0.0007906522,0.0007763681,0.002441529,0.0049682194,0.019371461,0.0027172146,0.0042089736,0.008581638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019228848,0.00058947556,0.00057463034,0.0030426395,0.020580119,0.01584458,0.01193183,0.009000541,0.003323017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003906629,0.0000638999,0.0011667901,0.00035416096,0.000011474661,0.00036852385,0.016719237,0.00020769062,0.00030438803,0.82128644,0.04518458,0.1142938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019645664,0.00004205613,0.0007256263,0.0006829291,0.000012708628,0.0011620125,0.0063120755,0.00051526795,0.00027632434,0.09406896,0.8961466,0.00003580972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010325984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012003849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019371461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009340982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010492849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078679085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529965099","doi":"","title":"OPEN GOVERNANCE: The Case For Unregulated E-Commerce","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Government (linguistics); Key (lock); Payment; Corporate governance; E-commerce; Face (sociological concept); Business; Postponement; Computer science; Internet privacy; Computer security; Marketing; World Wide Web; Finance; Sociology","score_opus":0.026512671708514637,"score_gpt":0.268926119840406,"score_spread":0.24241344813189136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529965099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09952148,0.003180559,0.046006266,0.18505569,0.00081657333,0.0002405831,0.000051540705,0.000106153384,0.66502124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972877,0.000668455,0.0031656518,0.009341782,0.00038078192,0.00024743687,0.000018673285,0.000050646537,0.013249585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95866543,0.020801092,0.0010884914,0.0037045132,0.008326674,0.0074137514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9666461,0.018636346,0.0026636259,0.006764713,0.0022868116,0.0030024734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03134844,0.0003890579,0.00089864037,0.0017978915,0.014580469,0.026999775,0.0036331494,0.02233405,0.0056888084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052958965,0.00068329397,0.0014260006,0.0016745117,0.095362484,0.025130304,0.020186407,0.023004597,0.0009697214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026360885,0.0000070518354,0.000098115204,0.000003816702,0.0000010710409,0.00009274773,0.0013508261,0.000058486443,0.000018161123,0.9970994,0.0006623373,0.0006054588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021435302,0.000010850768,0.00020633747,0.00009622049,0.0000047468143,0.00016655466,0.002424949,0.00056980114,0.00007606065,0.9660798,0.030327601,0.000015773672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008999149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006053633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03134844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008692994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010979987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16578835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531130657","doi":"10.1177/1473779516661939","title":"Can class members appeal class action settlements? A study from British Columbia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Plaintiff; Appeal; Settlement (finance); Law; Negotiation; Political science; Human settlement; Class (philosophy); Supreme court; Action (physics); Business; History","score_opus":0.03313534164684181,"score_gpt":0.2782867312496811,"score_spread":0.2451513896028393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531130657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9374328,0.0024135849,0.00008116379,0.004219634,0.0000343405,0.00013112914,0.0003528172,0.000006069279,0.05532851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782562,0.0028411252,0.000107599335,0.0022689814,0.000012784619,0.00006842405,0.00023475761,0.000011679993,0.016198335],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995849,0.0007178417,0.00011977489,0.0003362673,0.0011555448,0.0018215115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909705,0.0029395788,0.0007116098,0.0003044699,0.0032150657,0.0018587491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028169146,0.00035303566,0.0006752875,0.002706345,0.019795375,0.0056239897,0.002540682,0.0019197335,0.005936278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009293797,0.00044840088,0.0002847562,0.006382403,0.0037524784,0.0016499001,0.0024006423,0.003116509,0.000736029],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006329821,0.002413717,0.41555303,0.00074630906,0.00013543153,0.0063771405,0.35921443,0.00051649834,0.0021149467,0.033468273,0.0546369,0.12419029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008159908,0.00020953629,0.49211887,0.00093179336,0.00010617375,0.0004301895,0.41752532,0.0004145022,0.0004446527,0.0011932297,0.08643232,0.000111798196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9933575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08154615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08154615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.095054634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5916615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531384980","doi":"","title":"Mediation: Principles, Process, Practice (Canadian Edition)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Process (computing); Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.028163035938826783,"score_gpt":0.28161693436902974,"score_spread":0.25345389843020294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531384980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044910813,0.47658756,0.008896621,0.020279042,0.005034178,0.00027738023,0.0018672122,0.0004920526,0.48611677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022180682,0.45105916,0.014314542,0.006028374,0.002299955,0.0004278475,0.0017750409,0.0003827246,0.50153166],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962528,0.0005483624,0.00018086021,0.0002839589,0.0023092818,0.00042470123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771833,0.0005211263,0.00010935053,0.00015919698,0.0012968767,0.00019516551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030116946,0.0012692466,0.001175644,0.0030741245,0.004464521,0.0070127486,0.002408716,0.0032065685,0.068607286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005478313,0.0008891709,0.0008452266,0.007836383,0.004947178,0.005207552,0.0025579252,0.002951831,0.023679508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021054264,0.00002011368,0.00016128807,0.0010755497,0.000011494449,0.0001249644,0.0010036697,0.00039275305,0.00019668305,0.068580754,0.7685799,0.1598318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029893804,0.000005010951,0.00020712799,0.00047094366,0.000005350311,0.0000815389,0.00020685478,0.000029844483,0.000055375083,0.008269755,0.99065536,0.000009724002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46344867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5292782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46344867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020679587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057664596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92150223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2537124847","doi":"","title":"Implementation of E-Consent Mechanisms in Three Countries: Canada, England, and the Netherlands","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public relations","score_opus":0.011719150412103339,"score_gpt":0.24117296243489159,"score_spread":0.22945381202278825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2537124847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9112157,0.0020173376,0.002576349,0.008281764,0.00014109952,0.0017705214,0.00081431755,0.00012452558,0.07305843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98427564,0.00043649497,0.0022284724,0.00082897505,0.000008872903,0.0002704638,0.00029080853,0.000017821523,0.011642424],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9718105,0.007856567,0.0021294567,0.0013125935,0.007098321,0.009792596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9336636,0.03450065,0.0038292338,0.003365875,0.019474858,0.0051658214],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024674315,0.0003725473,0.00068671117,0.0018155471,0.009629454,0.008409975,0.0031504866,0.0034031656,0.0037148478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05878566,0.0007014317,0.00050810806,0.0040707407,0.0052959058,0.0030369484,0.0048971614,0.0023337987,0.00024233286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038429096,0.002580864,0.17265883,0.0024501306,0.00037379682,0.006144103,0.109453015,0.023621647,0.0049388097,0.27689394,0.034576096,0.3624659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029630987,0.0012261779,0.5091487,0.001838659,0.000490608,0.00063493114,0.15142131,0.012630976,0.011390498,0.01048389,0.29713014,0.00064104126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9677555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97279173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07545948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21775907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5474994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W255601659","doi":"","title":"Resolving Mass Wrongs: A Command-Consensus Perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Political science; Law and economics; Arbitration; Politics; Scrutiny; Negotiation; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.009599708442629959,"score_gpt":0.23498008379136767,"score_spread":0.22538037534873773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W255601659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026727911,0.008956303,0.35424915,0.095814265,0.0011363236,0.00020740251,0.00005862634,0.00020750302,0.51264256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9291341,0.0037440525,0.035714377,0.00501082,0.0010173926,0.0002491053,0.00005305488,0.0001282064,0.024948964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770247,0.012565509,0.0009814647,0.0020596164,0.005323678,0.0020450759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849384,0.009496457,0.0014364119,0.0013302881,0.001963348,0.0008349824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026284635,0.001182197,0.0010404806,0.005477773,0.012603135,0.014416808,0.0053185835,0.013060658,0.006690632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025969567,0.0005424502,0.0012685625,0.003077009,0.05628551,0.025550952,0.010060016,0.009337593,0.0014684707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003896991,0.000008750338,0.000055615936,0.000025895233,0.000003835615,0.000069339425,0.0030001118,0.0008461571,0.00004149744,0.9928818,0.00050039747,0.002562615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000707719,0.000013288018,0.00005014267,0.000090387126,0.000004681825,0.00004997448,0.0021665238,0.0018956737,0.00013247623,0.97629434,0.019281903,0.000013652859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005960377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032806573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026284635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013127806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010717847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1390081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2558528735","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n10p88","title":"Mistakes in Electronic Contracts in Iranian Law and UN Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in Electronic Contracts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Convention; Electronic communication; Compensation (psychology); Business; The Internet; Law; Law and economics; Computer science; Telecommunications; Political science; Economics; World Wide Web; Psychology","score_opus":0.0305068174550904,"score_gpt":0.25043693201110917,"score_spread":0.21993011455601877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2558528735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068096615,0.01846772,0.01676082,0.07295632,0.0028256217,0.00023883773,0.00021711321,0.00016768234,0.8202693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8963362,0.00646365,0.014667374,0.027679022,0.0017068585,0.00029588162,0.00017192746,0.00008154261,0.052597515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9643813,0.008980597,0.003390724,0.0023642352,0.017986711,0.0028965129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852909,0.0068468004,0.0020309563,0.001623097,0.003805126,0.00040313113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018126562,0.0002995555,0.00035461632,0.0015805607,0.0062034936,0.0077095446,0.0012895617,0.00536496,0.0022449326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026416829,0.0003793748,0.00042107145,0.0025529831,0.015670126,0.006401877,0.002535713,0.006058323,0.00044902216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010373538,0.000017584565,0.0009100954,0.000038941285,0.0000030283584,0.00014856411,0.003684114,0.0002512178,0.00011152711,0.9630253,0.014080357,0.017719045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026780323,0.00006908709,0.008211897,0.00057373755,0.000020952608,0.0007918733,0.0036237214,0.0018735052,0.0009120318,0.2617225,0.72207314,0.0001008198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024720423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012465545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024720423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078115407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0123364255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09586358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561107346","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n1p32","title":"Investigation and Comparison of Time and Location of Contract Conclusion in Iranian Electronic Commerce Act and UNCITRAL Model Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Confusion; Business; Law; Work (physics); Computer science; Political science; The Internet; Engineering","score_opus":0.020850705823077086,"score_gpt":0.25986534372104086,"score_spread":0.2390146378979638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561107346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9426696,0.0005160727,0.0040139537,0.00096980785,0.000070577094,0.00013655773,0.0001748253,0.00001990255,0.051428728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997488,0.00014465136,0.00077671575,0.000054721608,0.000012759249,0.000028219034,0.000100973106,0.0000041553863,0.0013898243],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99244845,0.0020170656,0.0006744523,0.0005658433,0.003743293,0.0005508333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697772,0.015240061,0.0064113815,0.00095970166,0.006753037,0.00085851876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060162176,0.0001024329,0.0001868866,0.0044528483,0.0014732414,0.0030448746,0.00076972484,0.00061617355,0.0033302403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033947375,0.000115381845,0.00027030127,0.0035997154,0.0033258593,0.002999344,0.0012239278,0.0009835004,0.0002475081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005106539,0.00029407087,0.4984174,0.00029652883,0.00006077095,0.0014976909,0.0768817,0.0022688608,0.0013285717,0.27261025,0.0052033323,0.14063005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033651093,0.00034208395,0.80246973,0.00025524205,0.00009069562,0.00079297606,0.11649602,0.009550201,0.0024499467,0.023442838,0.04400211,0.000074463875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01731338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01285523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01731338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005322369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031006034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038616657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562342201","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n1p252","title":"Principles of the Development of Transactions Jurisprudence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Worship; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.024657531593290472,"score_gpt":0.24666844197645849,"score_spread":0.222010910383168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562342201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006670546,0.007809624,0.3325957,0.037074298,0.0021068458,0.00068502704,0.00027487727,0.00029825015,0.61248493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61983556,0.0059201717,0.2573357,0.017467123,0.005027754,0.0038381373,0.000365477,0.0006432622,0.08956678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95531636,0.017748084,0.0038042967,0.007047601,0.01355417,0.00252956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9677509,0.016754052,0.0021436925,0.005212564,0.007235269,0.0009035509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038493555,0.0011594688,0.0018991521,0.0047536884,0.008080943,0.018737853,0.005077399,0.00976588,0.0056135515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03625401,0.0015462134,0.002361726,0.00329928,0.0858984,0.014939365,0.008039384,0.021002837,0.0035959133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012037902,0.0000030115584,0.00001778911,0.000011412076,0.000001954759,0.000013394314,0.00043006914,0.000058971975,0.000019521274,0.9982849,0.00039823266,0.00075949804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010548934,0.000009824205,0.00006932198,0.000080750586,0.00000350035,0.0000691298,0.00018489228,0.00035920547,0.00009174338,0.94663596,0.052471846,0.000013273364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048979907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020567647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038493555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010844192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012856641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20357585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564448290","doi":"10.1145/3018992","title":"Why less is more when it comes to internet jurisdiction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications of the ACM","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Jurisdiction; Computer science; Internet privacy; Computer security; World Wide Web; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06120091830732004,"score_gpt":0.2925925441221761,"score_spread":0.23139162581485606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564448290","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061262142,0.010712947,0.007641806,0.6748744,0.001340285,0.000035978468,0.0001863098,0.00002811031,0.24391806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9577134,0.0023113093,0.0013541654,0.032144636,0.0012013476,0.000023269124,0.000038512986,0.000047875503,0.0051653893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879289,0.0065861135,0.00029575222,0.0010862404,0.002254031,0.0018489998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95003366,0.03679094,0.0031461446,0.0012958245,0.0054567386,0.0032767202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011420573,0.00020535005,0.0006082811,0.0013786802,0.00570825,0.017386798,0.0017290078,0.009823133,0.017227843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06497555,0.00028346875,0.00039518642,0.0015051579,0.02208061,0.02894802,0.0049170973,0.009900008,0.00088706805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080494014,0.00007020183,0.0054618134,0.00015975966,0.000050583483,0.0005105779,0.006966867,0.00094015215,0.00014700256,0.9213507,0.039737467,0.024524372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018806417,0.000020372592,0.0023797494,0.0002657504,0.0000316066,0.00017116556,0.019074013,0.0008346388,0.00016226196,0.9228216,0.054188084,0.00003195213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016834721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025716456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017386798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065019187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007246606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06039852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580367862","doi":"","title":"Book review: R.L. Campbell, Legal Issues in Electronic Commerce","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.011578094067662371,"score_gpt":0.2581104052956027,"score_spread":0.24653231122794034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580367862","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014227869,0.8471554,0.00030525972,0.047380235,0.024151264,0.00010722289,0.0007573683,0.000104753264,0.07989617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015968647,0.7801648,0.0005094988,0.028621217,0.013215558,0.00012064645,0.0011511161,0.00010654428,0.17451382],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983677,0.00017283244,0.000114705996,0.00020353007,0.0010440351,0.00009725599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960969,0.0013479239,0.00022611147,0.00008831175,0.001959946,0.0002808314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011068692,0.001376026,0.0023147992,0.003727902,0.0013856528,0.005289843,0.0023743256,0.005081358,0.0810113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006724349,0.00073697267,0.0007419208,0.008821689,0.0011707658,0.005032168,0.0014027742,0.005200408,0.060608402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040825694,0.0000063471807,0.000020787365,0.000611211,0.000003570286,0.000016535685,0.000027914417,0.00002128128,0.000020477837,0.00082498736,0.97355676,0.02488609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000592306,0.0000058802066,0.00017294241,0.0014063766,0.0000069267535,0.00009627054,0.000038160924,0.000013154575,0.000015050629,0.00038696296,0.9978452,0.0000071266763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015951784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032754354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0810113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036231792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008649966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2710098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W259280662","doi":"","title":"Status of Standards of Tenure and Promotion in Debate","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Political science; Business; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.012300131987909796,"score_gpt":0.22674682968758936,"score_spread":0.21444669769967956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W259280662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16639751,0.04426496,0.022735277,0.14730693,0.0047286516,0.00020290176,0.0005064744,0.00024088698,0.6136164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98124415,0.0019188175,0.0037590486,0.0035245132,0.0018932181,0.00020158372,0.00014368285,0.00008392144,0.0072310762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8877157,0.05798066,0.009522363,0.008865219,0.026624426,0.009291564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70185196,0.19387354,0.017927373,0.031774923,0.043054312,0.011517771],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11498928,0.0004587677,0.0017904465,0.009423471,0.016508687,0.039101478,0.0049648075,0.016671848,0.0048559564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21987653,0.0009617483,0.0009296989,0.012440077,0.041184586,0.018246459,0.011038524,0.013547408,0.0006659949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007120246,0.000038143095,0.0015571825,0.00007333416,0.000008750527,0.000008179999,0.004245207,0.00008042454,0.000058829413,0.970892,0.0027884366,0.020178214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013956676,0.00018982509,0.018382046,0.0013224626,0.000061219784,0.00007809203,0.012807423,0.0009055427,0.00086935493,0.8482335,0.11690719,0.00010389462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009896157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009748907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8850107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015478624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021453457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60812867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594779207","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n2p146","title":"A Comparative Study on the Role of the Electronic Commerce Act in Remote Transactions and Its Effect on Compensation from Iran and France Legal Perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Database transaction; Business; E-commerce; Compensation (psychology); Legislature; Credibility; Law; Perspective (graphical); The Internet; Competition (biology); Bad faith; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.020567029471783273,"score_gpt":0.2873603086956823,"score_spread":0.266793279223899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594779207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9595179,0.0010516781,0.0001148939,0.00086838857,0.00001599945,0.00001555611,0.000026208747,0.0000032597395,0.03838605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975938,0.00028324203,0.000045063847,0.00009054117,0.000013805451,0.0000040491955,0.000021868127,0.000001052794,0.0019465076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976622,0.0009082772,0.00008133242,0.00012255207,0.00065118674,0.00057452865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938909,0.0028850425,0.0013759226,0.00017848673,0.0011839444,0.00048573976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002510877,0.00013529521,0.00020089993,0.0024848543,0.0019255528,0.0020966588,0.0004881665,0.00084836123,0.009058307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006002634,0.00008733161,0.00042554713,0.0015727669,0.001983808,0.0013534263,0.0010101362,0.00090282597,0.0003340075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008473949,0.002390577,0.5817422,0.00038436856,0.00017823544,0.005845509,0.08060823,0.0018501951,0.0013701052,0.18732525,0.008170699,0.12928721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003384098,0.00055794185,0.8873262,0.00019772927,0.00009879522,0.0010255062,0.06715106,0.0014527387,0.00037340846,0.0020317305,0.039715715,0.00003527197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02501776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025872324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02501776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004181106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020244487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049744308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597013458","doi":"10.3390/laws6010005","title":"Prospects for a Sports Ombudsman in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Athletes; Political science; Dispute resolution; Law; Resolution (logic); Public administration; Public relations; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.015663912198140152,"score_gpt":0.22295811861284814,"score_spread":0.207294206414708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597013458","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17986245,0.012086984,0.009530265,0.44957823,0.0046445746,0.0011480057,0.00061352254,0.00044596894,0.34208992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6643796,0.0058279024,0.020722322,0.08574641,0.00061955774,0.00032006207,0.0004945305,0.0001113416,0.22177826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98357165,0.0020126712,0.00054095354,0.0011306795,0.0046516624,0.00809234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790709,0.0022588356,0.0010610471,0.00078748196,0.008523993,0.008297696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014511289,0.00041396084,0.0005037171,0.0021877654,0.017928138,0.010803992,0.003926216,0.008485271,0.012245582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016898602,0.000689581,0.00088730047,0.0025817265,0.0049210605,0.0041561928,0.00589839,0.005905882,0.00079449185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020506226,0.00029910257,0.023509732,0.00030029556,0.0000377034,0.00085861,0.004228262,0.0013484837,0.0013860097,0.7470502,0.10250974,0.11826677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000138702,0.00017055107,0.023324521,0.0007003091,0.000039704206,0.00021533846,0.008859168,0.0027988572,0.00080439216,0.018136092,0.94466764,0.00014475959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.954695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9678724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07110878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07110878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3396904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51593274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598830428","doi":"","title":"Some leading academic ICT-law programmes in the EuropeanUnion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information and Communications Technology; European commission; Informatics; European union; Action plan; Commission; Plan (archaeology); Action (physics); Political science; Column (typography); Computer science; Law; Library science; Management; Telecommunications; Business","score_opus":0.029082099688897415,"score_gpt":0.270571487265745,"score_spread":0.24148938757684757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598830428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09207894,0.08142832,0.0025420222,0.036663104,0.0070645134,0.00050438766,0.0024134163,0.0018613294,0.7754439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20833413,0.04428389,0.0059617544,0.0072498308,0.0030588696,0.00046629983,0.0033945767,0.0007250294,0.7265256],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958413,0.0011700259,0.00024551543,0.00038420034,0.00083276414,0.0015261105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920866,0.00082246185,0.00033387227,0.00030319794,0.0012475336,0.005206261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005010653,0.0011824572,0.0005582772,0.007742708,0.005298094,0.0075434344,0.001477148,0.0026021085,0.06250134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00374863,0.00062276714,0.0005102149,0.015521737,0.0014303399,0.0023768637,0.0051553366,0.0020984136,0.018264903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005634481,0.0024735061,0.010539615,0.0015940302,0.000030625422,0.0013910726,0.0074636773,0.0011645692,0.002670364,0.07792012,0.26125625,0.63293266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032070482,0.00012099708,0.009874393,0.0002503152,0.00000793757,0.00018468846,0.0021585135,0.0001056981,0.000819413,0.0012450208,0.9851857,0.000015257402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064321514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010247103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06250134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007901077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009121572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20908779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604546065","doi":"","title":"The trouble with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, UDRP, deconstructing common assumptions and developing a new approach to cybersquatting","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Domain name; Political science; Law; Intellectual property; Alternative dispute resolution; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; World Wide Web; The Internet","score_opus":0.006251406419049386,"score_gpt":0.17536557560361318,"score_spread":0.1691141691845638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604546065","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040132426,0.006786357,0.12790766,0.4442196,0.001168183,0.00010715102,0.00028529356,0.00018123152,0.37921217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83448017,0.004774929,0.061368257,0.038078308,0.0006196496,0.0002694315,0.00014095374,0.00036366127,0.05990461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9689173,0.015680226,0.0014825435,0.0031233225,0.008289022,0.0025076228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9476654,0.031071262,0.0023872247,0.006644856,0.010983494,0.0012479083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038591545,0.0004988413,0.0009553618,0.003082105,0.021827197,0.03239012,0.0042109266,0.0095937215,0.0046479083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06169397,0.00097619125,0.00069816585,0.005772124,0.08892805,0.029402412,0.00850899,0.024300093,0.0008073486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027279139,0.0000032238183,0.000060299528,0.000010261096,9.4313754e-7,0.000006559108,0.0025681318,0.00010282151,0.000016264506,0.9916563,0.002389033,0.0031835495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013130219,0.000005388549,0.0004671417,0.0002503918,0.000012032707,0.00005717111,0.010986436,0.0010649795,0.00041892365,0.9013858,0.085299276,0.000039446615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39734173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51263064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39734173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052108955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08199099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7900579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614751776","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2931538","title":"Proccdure et immattriel au Quubec (The Intangible in Quebec's Civil Procedure)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Civil procedure; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.006774504502097103,"score_gpt":0.2198739633170191,"score_spread":0.213099458814922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614751776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16069566,0.0199254,0.005589554,0.05567047,0.002199827,0.0002343912,0.0015337082,0.0002468436,0.7539041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43251392,0.0019120323,0.0014453527,0.0031740926,0.00016696233,0.00007514359,0.00017788734,0.00007563961,0.56045896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996977,0.0006190001,0.000087721826,0.00032425474,0.00089085527,0.0011012204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980793,0.00061625626,0.00013955132,0.00014773065,0.00056351017,0.00045361152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023955626,0.0003927647,0.00029007703,0.0011648124,0.0162621,0.009488415,0.0012467572,0.004720266,0.036686685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052100574,0.00036411348,0.0004382536,0.0017174712,0.0062427437,0.0020298518,0.002149928,0.0053103413,0.002287367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006696707,0.00006574124,0.008664224,0.00012458944,0.000012019286,0.000595283,0.014798497,0.0005739034,0.00058142975,0.76245916,0.12002193,0.09203628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016485008,0.000038428017,0.037170496,0.00019200782,0.0000125181305,0.00021590039,0.006323383,0.00050593406,0.0005637512,0.009345465,0.9455588,0.00005688947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9791711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058254424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058254424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05822615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42266738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617019007","doi":"10.1002/hed.24830","title":"Cases in head and neck cancer: A multidisciplinary approach Bari Hoffman Ruddy, Henry Ho, Christine Sapienza, Jeffrey J. Lehman Plural Publishing, San Diego, CA, 2016, USD 130, 279 pages","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Head & Neck","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Plural; Citation; Library science; Art; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Literature","score_opus":0.046145139284879226,"score_gpt":0.2964685422391986,"score_spread":0.2503234029543194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617019007","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1276077,0.34033793,0.013884261,0.24762787,0.010909883,0.0014462718,0.0006666629,0.0003635592,0.25715587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49894804,0.39892724,0.026446937,0.017342256,0.014457524,0.0005616961,0.0008435383,0.00017058014,0.042302262],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862146,0.0004407212,0.00018215361,0.00009039326,0.0004088408,0.00025642765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879265,0.00037048094,0.00018071174,0.00005053136,0.00022132442,0.000384263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020363117,0.0008051152,0.0004516588,0.0035479614,0.0042575416,0.0027105645,0.0014090819,0.002609873,0.0057788407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004541315,0.0006805038,0.00052131567,0.002429892,0.0022462907,0.002675944,0.0058922837,0.0023511448,0.0011231374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015709084,0.00039606408,0.042972714,0.0015728392,0.00008657771,0.13008866,0.009706024,0.0015554574,0.002282933,0.016208667,0.4442831,0.35068986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006155735,0.0001772997,0.07219971,0.0045564063,0.00008428919,0.4437038,0.050673474,0.0012675371,0.00065223366,0.03247934,0.39401415,0.00013030335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061977142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01600124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061977142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024756016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003779894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01933217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619444766","doi":"","title":"Book Review: The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act: An Annotated Guide by Stephanie Perrin, Heather H. Black, David H. Flaherty and T. Murray Rankin, Q.C. (Concord, Ont.: Irwin Law, 2001)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.010276382095731824,"score_gpt":0.22626142021990622,"score_spread":0.2159850381241744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619444766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00053975097,0.22883506,0.0029207475,0.047389857,0.017124066,0.000697915,0.004620027,0.0007294137,0.69714314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002747814,0.15626006,0.0024373273,0.012775074,0.003217183,0.00068449334,0.0047241123,0.00033580133,0.81681806],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968129,0.00046544606,0.00018159828,0.00020597708,0.002135267,0.00019885601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955649,0.0015954181,0.00027321314,0.00018143527,0.0021877906,0.00019732626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017928684,0.0014967361,0.0010794572,0.0050700186,0.0026917271,0.005550796,0.0021337008,0.004571835,0.08059078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005745938,0.00080661685,0.00049473596,0.007981698,0.0015176762,0.0048842933,0.0015075612,0.003889007,0.078490965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014402615,0.000009491297,0.000021711068,0.00010305206,4.4902492e-7,0.00001193795,0.000047366324,0.000044794797,0.000015891535,0.002855053,0.97423077,0.022658031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011295373,0.0000029973048,0.000193568,0.00045213415,8.142971e-7,0.000020834726,0.000052842748,0.000019691863,0.0000137360375,0.0008317066,0.9984061,0.0000044165263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042150725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06891743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95784926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050622053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011360772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.269603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620972567","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n3p174","title":"Position of Commercial Arbitration in Resolving Disputes among Customers and Banks in Iran","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Position (finance); Business; Negotiation; Order (exchange); Financial services; Intermediary; Confidentiality; Legislation; Online dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Mediation; Law; Accounting; Alternative dispute resolution; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.01838624770016251,"score_gpt":0.26335048278457207,"score_spread":0.24496423508440957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620972567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8450057,0.00424965,0.0035539013,0.016842963,0.0001960321,0.0002080672,0.000021136966,0.000028609553,0.12989394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784195,0.0002820756,0.00033688403,0.00029980665,0.000032581138,0.000013664065,0.000004463384,0.0000028156626,0.0011857187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9710032,0.01711246,0.0015021879,0.001201952,0.005759689,0.0034204235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97004503,0.017090734,0.004300789,0.0010627261,0.005253201,0.0022474546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022910973,0.0002459574,0.00041327078,0.0023944837,0.012044471,0.009388474,0.0016035852,0.0034523208,0.00686477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038918536,0.00030625972,0.00035411955,0.0024554562,0.0075645517,0.004953191,0.004116246,0.0027486624,0.0004986155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007904512,0.00065181724,0.13309477,0.0005557619,0.00009187307,0.0052114557,0.25074708,0.0010664458,0.0015545986,0.32960987,0.014953826,0.26167214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026221244,0.0005834603,0.13177939,0.0011717477,0.00023290685,0.0066524274,0.5513695,0.011536222,0.0032259729,0.11644859,0.17646046,0.00027705086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008305081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065815896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022910973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006648131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010528287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12116623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625298576","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canadian Legislation, Court Cases & Related Information Online (freely available): New Brunswick","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Business; Law; Internet privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06320233718098392,"score_gpt":0.298497852923826,"score_spread":0.2352955157428421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625298576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015014482,0.0026028552,0.0009988946,0.0043292088,0.00050348026,0.0018556966,0.32190132,0.00092193997,0.6653852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0053430833,0.004213932,0.0041398862,0.0011765646,0.00007913478,0.0011877912,0.08148667,0.00068528956,0.9016876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961966,0.00023583308,0.00032490477,0.00024255374,0.002365944,0.0006340618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751397,0.003968663,0.00059309317,0.0010658158,0.017816346,0.0014163645],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005020395,0.0013842843,0.001157707,0.019786658,0.009646153,0.0077251983,0.0036407092,0.0024918837,0.39694625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018426482,0.0018982178,0.0006289884,0.035085883,0.0020392209,0.0034634483,0.0017991088,0.0027413627,0.10054786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008506297,0.000016888853,0.00025942567,0.00016756488,0.000001205857,0.00001633236,0.00024976264,0.00006142145,0.000028912153,0.0038398958,0.98147756,0.0138725145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011637736,0.000004075404,0.004268261,0.00035749536,0.0000055845176,0.000015772112,0.00089865027,0.0000658512,0.00011160645,0.0010886737,0.99314946,0.000022991615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39694625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0738072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25664598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.860183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2733769483","doi":"","title":"Settling for Less: How the Rules of Civil Procedure Overlook the Public Perspective of Justice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Civil procedure; Settlement (finance); Honour; Autonomy; Mediation; Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.030294150786374277,"score_gpt":0.23773102650554007,"score_spread":0.2074368757191658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2733769483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14379616,0.0065481933,0.014391572,0.24869592,0.00094231137,0.00013090186,0.00012161745,0.000088966444,0.5852843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958829,0.0017215069,0.0017507408,0.011088193,0.00021959996,0.00005912752,0.000026176273,0.0000866399,0.02621901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97183585,0.009609927,0.0006455828,0.00239945,0.009722019,0.0057871654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847787,0.008445793,0.0012817612,0.0018053913,0.0025673,0.0011210699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015144278,0.00047998712,0.00078914524,0.0013290999,0.026413757,0.017393788,0.0028261181,0.0077050515,0.00402411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026848555,0.0006061462,0.0008764793,0.0015578906,0.064551584,0.008618868,0.007337681,0.009725959,0.0005441643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025728867,0.000019067751,0.00223251,0.000053053544,0.000014949047,0.00023982294,0.035296187,0.0005636283,0.00020583828,0.93757814,0.009744909,0.014026159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098703546,0.00006998842,0.011422192,0.00029016653,0.00008447675,0.0002185911,0.045418244,0.0014467017,0.0006479896,0.5768413,0.3633241,0.00013758091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.848139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88907665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.848139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07965782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.075177334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57796067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741262743","doi":"","title":"Teknik Dinlemeye Dair! \"Gizli Dinleme Kanunlarõna ve Uygulamalarõna Dair Bir Aratõrma\"","year":2004,"lang":"tr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Law enforcement; Political science; Enforcement; Art","score_opus":0.009129492678511554,"score_gpt":0.22403557647337605,"score_spread":0.2149060837948645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741262743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01458717,0.037733275,0.008687711,0.023129744,0.009103251,0.00007240798,0.00049922976,0.00070907647,0.9054782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.065962315,0.014260883,0.004544449,0.0026040736,0.0009834013,0.000057400335,0.0004940492,0.00026807224,0.9108254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995765,0.000095316864,0.000019620265,0.00007679015,0.00016388587,0.00006793065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964297,0.000086481676,0.000034312292,0.00002923087,0.00015162902,0.000055457112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042110618,0.0005799764,0.0002996629,0.0005177768,0.0019068089,0.003924439,0.00055518746,0.0009871846,0.039049618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009592825,0.0002360273,0.00035916606,0.00075145136,0.0019535897,0.0028035867,0.0011646604,0.0025351583,0.011465004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009686495,0.000039420804,0.0008904664,0.00041980864,0.000011167065,0.00030053916,0.0073217982,0.00032963415,0.001489359,0.19002569,0.6028046,0.1962707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002742967,0.000019790217,0.0009415584,0.00015946802,0.0000039593915,0.00013638892,0.00163249,0.00011900103,0.00032981875,0.0036993134,0.99294734,0.000008098894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076765325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012657092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039049618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022765733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028459392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13063401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748972388","doi":"","title":"The Role of Courts in Assisting Individuals in Realizing Their s. 2(b) Right to Information about Court Proceedings","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Freedom of information; Court of record; Supreme court; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.00854641027460112,"score_gpt":0.2201169760048365,"score_spread":0.2115705657302354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748972388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022066219,0.0033806823,0.01721929,0.26477453,0.0009693597,0.00019005669,0.0001677089,0.0001936923,0.6910385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7555285,0.003632107,0.017063068,0.09954973,0.00074125617,0.00019813796,0.00014097491,0.00010952324,0.12303672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9529946,0.01144947,0.0016714076,0.0043058507,0.018986858,0.010591948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94772077,0.021409556,0.0029006763,0.0038010476,0.015741922,0.008426099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02926852,0.0005297397,0.0006263022,0.0023815618,0.023087867,0.024066187,0.0034922427,0.013605783,0.009162775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041675113,0.0007050477,0.00083144975,0.0020626944,0.03552018,0.011917301,0.009396167,0.010957179,0.0016845425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015188567,0.000026265101,0.0021663327,0.00005240803,0.000012030946,0.00029748367,0.009774336,0.00028409733,0.00037833233,0.93537986,0.025398483,0.026215155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050982166,0.000057797697,0.007550901,0.00080921274,0.00008567049,0.0005854565,0.01328465,0.0010615989,0.0012418262,0.22190228,0.75309056,0.00027898158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7268421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7616003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7268421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03322664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11666397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5495331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757274567","doi":"","title":"Did You Really Send It? Email Evidence in Litigation and Arbitration in Argentina","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Arbitration; Law; Civil procedure; Order (exchange); Liability; Economic Justice; Business; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05439256140919605,"score_gpt":0.287463436352665,"score_spread":0.23307087494346898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757274567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5235385,0.07179152,0.0015809152,0.10462042,0.0012231416,0.00017393772,0.00040471673,0.000040014187,0.29662687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758177,0.0075131417,0.00044437012,0.004687099,0.0005504204,0.00006118098,0.00009738391,0.000013559174,0.010815164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909952,0.0037363952,0.0005885178,0.00069137,0.0023204784,0.0016680793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98695415,0.008115528,0.0024327424,0.0003240619,0.0014630196,0.00071046624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007924611,0.0003568211,0.0007367999,0.0028898185,0.0088587105,0.006619634,0.0014531784,0.0066470704,0.01029038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02452814,0.0004059668,0.00025265242,0.003427126,0.005808865,0.0033485722,0.0046733622,0.0030326347,0.00061140937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000654215,0.0005120473,0.083712086,0.0015743712,0.00013495803,0.020956364,0.096558236,0.000705031,0.00094424805,0.5452539,0.11119801,0.13779655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018649777,0.0002735041,0.19363873,0.0055321427,0.00021407803,0.0064828717,0.08813955,0.0035429876,0.00096545095,0.07597119,0.6248795,0.00017362181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039579242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050097056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039579242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011052108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052569485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08018899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759396475","doi":"","title":"Collective Action and Class Action","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Redress; Political science; Collective action; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Civil procedure; Class (philosophy); Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; State (computer science); Politics","score_opus":0.036924360579755594,"score_gpt":0.280688400602602,"score_spread":0.24376404002284638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759396475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021360708,0.0050232415,0.0076286416,0.02727161,0.000477372,0.00008182608,0.00006617283,0.000039978193,0.93805045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90763533,0.0021485486,0.002308085,0.0043505975,0.00042216867,0.00014936258,0.00007323692,0.00004024343,0.08287243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927492,0.0020216235,0.00012941357,0.0013432836,0.001521203,0.0022352291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685365,0.000976737,0.00042131453,0.0004479819,0.00057022035,0.00073026464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063603814,0.00081397913,0.000557223,0.001882013,0.020122366,0.008473709,0.0017940523,0.004266824,0.013488565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004663823,0.00017641076,0.0005927834,0.001418899,0.07782754,0.0038679615,0.006783966,0.0037249385,0.0007786954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029329642,0.000006341713,0.00025723342,0.000011577508,0.000003173269,0.000022557657,0.005008479,0.000095722084,0.000020601146,0.98717713,0.003211889,0.0041822633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019659885,0.00001632478,0.0027697305,0.00015897703,0.000009933789,0.000051503128,0.00739235,0.0003561319,0.00007767905,0.6748095,0.31431574,0.000022437094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27366358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2167642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27366358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025326885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015295181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54414135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759857153","doi":"","title":"Judicial Mediation in British Columbia: Moving Towards a More Effective Process","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"University Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Process (computing); Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.0049701109029485924,"score_gpt":0.18046794047988085,"score_spread":0.17549782957693225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759857153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34106374,0.011692481,0.008677537,0.1866131,0.0012713328,0.00088583323,0.00029247333,0.00028196472,0.44922152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8821906,0.004318912,0.010327316,0.014190719,0.00011536047,0.00023809624,0.00019427718,0.00012705941,0.08829774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838484,0.006042939,0.0006357526,0.001603835,0.0042689964,0.0036000288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9706303,0.010814065,0.0009628154,0.0015676728,0.010727024,0.0052981167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013962806,0.00030462316,0.0005563996,0.002178643,0.022804864,0.01758366,0.0033781053,0.005384248,0.014853368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031492665,0.00058216543,0.0003328971,0.0031118086,0.008613341,0.0044547874,0.0066555133,0.008099846,0.0011254862],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002052109,0.0004222346,0.023740795,0.00093620206,0.00006711885,0.004988444,0.08581925,0.0027598639,0.004415283,0.4129686,0.108793154,0.35488373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019876359,0.00012085573,0.05368768,0.0017628456,0.00007539223,0.00060521154,0.105702415,0.0031008972,0.00205021,0.039870538,0.7925249,0.00030030098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94128853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97627443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082774386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082774386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21322179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.600573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764219949","doi":"10.5539/ibr.v10n11p103","title":"Understanding the Nature and Process of Alternative Dispute Resolution and Collective Conciliation: Lessons from United Kingdom, Canada, South Africa and Japan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Business Research","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Dispute resolution; Negotiation; Alternative dispute resolution; Confidentiality; Dispute mechanism; Political science; Collective bargaining; Public relations; Arbitration; Business; Law","score_opus":0.17348725031544032,"score_gpt":0.36539343033997984,"score_spread":0.19190618002453952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764219949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9137104,0.020866927,0.0011184154,0.006370102,0.00007170057,0.00013106807,0.00012848641,0.000009843257,0.057593018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810693,0.013767851,0.0012775331,0.0005407487,0.000014010685,0.00003458668,0.00009054156,0.000011785203,0.0031935012],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967229,0.00083046325,0.00024393301,0.0002723762,0.0006139878,0.0013164359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900339,0.0047439733,0.0010568923,0.00028175826,0.002901963,0.0009815375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005176736,0.0004975847,0.0006980757,0.003916222,0.012808901,0.00728668,0.0010857157,0.0012635551,0.0018928491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010691398,0.00041024742,0.00043125803,0.009590262,0.0073677744,0.0045062276,0.0035672789,0.0019441062,0.00012375727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012608008,0.00007132626,0.06070018,0.0009801612,0.000031160613,0.0021877696,0.85586476,0.00034319804,0.00058233325,0.021325296,0.0014428404,0.056344885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009383903,0.000024066841,0.08007367,0.0010520424,0.00004756667,0.00022894012,0.88409954,0.00027948726,0.0003245134,0.0016615133,0.032155998,0.00004325711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96785295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9837007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05449243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05449243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07992512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3953721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768509059","doi":"","title":"Emerging Trends in Access to Justice and Dispute Resolution in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Online dispute resolution; Political science; Alternative dispute resolution; Law and economics; Computer science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.017534625541929215,"score_gpt":0.2587397691812636,"score_spread":0.2412051436393344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768509059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8371515,0.017062379,0.00050161587,0.06652653,0.00032697312,0.00007661106,0.005105344,0.000066409426,0.07318268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762024,0.005831725,0.00028812524,0.0023028103,0.00007662942,0.000021560792,0.0010116425,0.00002748685,0.014237672],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922862,0.00036853694,0.0003356052,0.00056604843,0.0027518892,0.003691696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9675713,0.00361355,0.003486008,0.00040894025,0.015247703,0.009672501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028336006,0.00023545169,0.0007337585,0.0067709214,0.011268613,0.009158357,0.003751648,0.0019859183,0.013969037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015871676,0.00052591355,0.00081167213,0.016770167,0.0041875676,0.0025377485,0.0035185101,0.004092061,0.0004730607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043218074,0.00035223665,0.71873313,0.0005470057,0.00018029234,0.0008723779,0.031446498,0.0014394112,0.0006037028,0.06715573,0.049004264,0.12923329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039621118,0.000043444914,0.8840959,0.00043149994,0.000049661994,0.00018488996,0.032906275,0.001011681,0.00017093019,0.0020046595,0.078965604,0.000095859294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99890256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81698567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18301435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25575846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94758755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770253679","doi":"10.1080/19186444.2010.11658220","title":"Elinor Ostrom, Institutional Analysis and Design, and Dispute Systems Design","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transnational Corporation Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institutional analysis; Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Management science; Regional science; Economics; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.036538044700349284,"score_gpt":0.2516466358078716,"score_spread":0.21510859110752234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770253679","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029877685,0.082739964,0.5167344,0.14398445,0.0013956398,0.00054394983,0.0003496401,0.00036557362,0.22400868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6780472,0.05544943,0.19846636,0.009351576,0.0010740798,0.0012784491,0.00018503949,0.00022855538,0.055919312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99301696,0.004548897,0.00039611818,0.00053649326,0.0012281097,0.00027340782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732955,0.023355732,0.0007844525,0.0008343233,0.0015297715,0.00020016599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011477514,0.00046433185,0.0006253911,0.002408576,0.0029456194,0.007183772,0.0011845846,0.0037731114,0.00824932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034293555,0.0006180368,0.00036448825,0.0027659999,0.0069809835,0.011100725,0.0023187303,0.0021639296,0.0010356293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029228027,0.000034251876,0.00065002544,0.000280124,0.00001452414,0.00005805264,0.0015887247,0.0011976631,0.00017426252,0.9497813,0.014937152,0.031254582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006633702,0.000040292194,0.0007505162,0.0004000297,0.00006584414,0.00010242704,0.0022047246,0.004575101,0.0009729069,0.85268176,0.13810015,0.00003996964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055528283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010325112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011477514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003374325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003938122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06069964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774218734","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3080367","title":"Mediation-Arbitration in Ontario: Labour Relations, Human Rights, and Beyond?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Mediation; Human rights; Political science; Industrial relations; Law; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.008801438755072895,"score_gpt":0.23178914506654805,"score_spread":0.22298770631147516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774218734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31662732,0.019263081,0.002234479,0.17373823,0.0006995901,0.00019036763,0.001305382,0.0000674301,0.48587406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91652584,0.0042314613,0.00094695133,0.002309567,0.00009075391,0.00006030151,0.00016668052,0.000028060733,0.07564032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99257565,0.0014007333,0.00022184524,0.0004741196,0.0013937888,0.003933942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325997,0.0021011515,0.0008274596,0.00048044397,0.0014961354,0.0018348349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051853573,0.00031972257,0.0006666048,0.0011568492,0.020859288,0.010895892,0.0022524076,0.003794068,0.026645321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016714528,0.0004894387,0.00045053646,0.0049034622,0.013395238,0.0053636394,0.006426793,0.0028563752,0.00083466823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043650492,0.00010414567,0.037334733,0.0005059129,0.00006886727,0.0011019094,0.052514363,0.0011564922,0.00044663972,0.7571169,0.07175854,0.077454925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017037256,0.000052028427,0.108865425,0.00088424335,0.00008951414,0.00029158263,0.11044331,0.0014462434,0.0006558122,0.10231058,0.67460275,0.00018811981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98980826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98980826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12987304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24301344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94229925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775761272","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5008","title":"ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND JUSTICE SYSTEM INTEGRATION: BRITISH COLUMBIA’S CIVIL RESOLUTION TRIBUNAL","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Online dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Dispute resolution; Proposition; Transformational leadership; Political science; Resolution (logic); Law; Alternative dispute resolution; Mediation; Computer science; Public relations; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.037443886373358194,"score_gpt":0.28219286545571165,"score_spread":0.24474897908235346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775761272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14314567,0.007937738,0.0031747026,0.08138497,0.0012431841,0.00030057697,0.0005027696,0.00026194722,0.76204836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6636454,0.0027208717,0.0030712613,0.01691748,0.0001762068,0.00015921146,0.0004830153,0.00011841355,0.3127081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876694,0.0016120536,0.00028813363,0.0007260169,0.005277485,0.0044269986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99111664,0.0019922727,0.00028280145,0.00060859206,0.0034012431,0.0025984591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004385267,0.0002865485,0.0003617895,0.0018891322,0.03525485,0.020856781,0.0026771915,0.0052956594,0.018451972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010816504,0.0004831347,0.00028911207,0.0041231345,0.0075338087,0.0037491606,0.006699933,0.007022098,0.001586283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011403044,0.00039728233,0.012552079,0.00028413304,0.000043411077,0.002840454,0.03332666,0.0015745386,0.0012293332,0.3834729,0.28026706,0.28389817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040356357,0.000046909114,0.02377787,0.00026843714,0.00002138622,0.00030325228,0.02856733,0.0011998803,0.0005670046,0.009903426,0.935169,0.00013524514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98011625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99143815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10977835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10977835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15293959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7965014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W277828456","doi":"","title":"Mediator Liability in Canada: An Examination of Emerging of American and Canadian Jurisprudence","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Jurisprudence; Mediator; Statute; Context (archaeology); Law; Liability; Political science; Malpractice; Business; Medicine; History","score_opus":0.004432102030006322,"score_gpt":0.20468368245521948,"score_spread":0.20025158042521315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W277828456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5682098,0.05934055,0.0015622834,0.09089934,0.00037722406,0.00034251323,0.0012887798,0.00008941112,0.2778901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96441644,0.022472933,0.0012523456,0.005398745,0.000044084434,0.00004512715,0.00024684626,0.000024293713,0.0060992264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97536045,0.00103184,0.0008206612,0.0011383712,0.016787076,0.0048615728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9529885,0.008766937,0.0030167962,0.00066603866,0.03042086,0.0041408897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010513018,0.00035195207,0.00067945325,0.0130440425,0.030465048,0.010065061,0.0038721932,0.0034792079,0.00291697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03352318,0.00052999705,0.0007582779,0.020103795,0.009120288,0.0021929396,0.004578384,0.003958574,0.00016594699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002965118,0.00014182834,0.2207811,0.0013799814,0.00019241184,0.003677295,0.15902051,0.0014736847,0.0015263251,0.3661279,0.053120997,0.19226138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005720662,0.00007087626,0.4893362,0.0019970024,0.0002570703,0.0011471512,0.12949029,0.0012962093,0.00083015626,0.008411416,0.3668093,0.00029721073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.283581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.283581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40520737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83094454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782876359","doi":"","title":"The Bi-modal Pattern of Mediation in the United States and Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Modal; Geography; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014654035371679587,"score_gpt":0.20913823183559185,"score_spread":0.19448419646391227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782876359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41227654,0.011133236,0.0030487718,0.03688566,0.00030351573,0.00042619242,0.004036437,0.0002887199,0.531601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95588547,0.0044970703,0.0016330602,0.002925352,0.000021038783,0.00009561689,0.0010491274,0.00006716161,0.03382603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917129,0.00080742594,0.0002599223,0.0007587644,0.00258723,0.0038736695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920351,0.000721876,0.00052832946,0.0003450219,0.0041235806,0.0022460446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020166142,0.00030807155,0.00061297946,0.0039261305,0.018061206,0.00795324,0.0023204386,0.0012682853,0.011053911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008410997,0.0004386569,0.0005801578,0.012883095,0.005987503,0.0012355025,0.005334553,0.002589139,0.0006131939],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020825234,0.00014169201,0.109450094,0.00047639234,0.00014742704,0.0023322243,0.051826406,0.001532493,0.0011501045,0.6303968,0.074457005,0.12788118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012099773,0.00005972641,0.3519756,0.001138305,0.0001263321,0.0014126445,0.12049813,0.002382589,0.00084372214,0.02203552,0.49912718,0.0002792493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99508625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106569335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.106569335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21612276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7732183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788510423","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Supreme Court rules on the matter of standing to sue for damages held by indirect purchasers in class action proceedings (Sun-Rype Products / Archer Daniels Midland)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Class action; Supreme court; Law; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Political science; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02551611969357193,"score_gpt":0.2330439522027972,"score_spread":0.20752783250922527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788510423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018096771,0.004438828,0.0033572086,0.11863962,0.004150679,0.0006758913,0.005696743,0.00049190124,0.8444523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21244325,0.003804048,0.008385112,0.114290856,0.0011164284,0.00039504663,0.002519383,0.00037109377,0.6566748],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754773,0.0009268813,0.00090640533,0.0012625087,0.016110124,0.0053167515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802886,0.0034880652,0.00040441452,0.0009656857,0.01276939,0.0020838808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009610959,0.0009784194,0.0009959798,0.0032397367,0.021528387,0.0147640975,0.006000074,0.018449292,0.017381934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025834056,0.0017814857,0.0014820336,0.0034598506,0.0069514806,0.0025784087,0.0031428179,0.018388284,0.0052260347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033974422,0.000048299233,0.001780574,0.000055114182,0.00002598052,0.00024861566,0.0015428864,0.00023610379,0.00073897117,0.2128769,0.76750445,0.014908153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009669835,0.000039750947,0.014758406,0.0005035213,0.00013672165,0.00015181002,0.0021010288,0.0007730031,0.001352948,0.018778095,0.960987,0.00032109968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98123187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99350595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06463859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06463859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21334267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.468988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788959582","doi":"","title":"'Online Speech and the Workplace: Public Right, Private Regulation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"City Research Online (City University London)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Social media; Public relations; Expansive; Scope (computer science); Business; Labour law; Work (physics); Political science; Sociology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.05928838914796203,"score_gpt":0.29575718388973143,"score_spread":0.2364687947417694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788959582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10798595,0.0031395569,0.011929627,0.24534889,0.00075265986,0.000059704416,0.00012912916,0.00014559367,0.63050884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93777454,0.00041725332,0.0007542087,0.018650506,0.00025064475,0.000046231096,0.000021803831,0.000036012436,0.042048797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840189,0.004486468,0.0005002476,0.0016414349,0.0045878016,0.0047650496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98089874,0.012603903,0.0013928482,0.002158467,0.0018476162,0.0010983316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013604478,0.00030402493,0.00043151056,0.00091037527,0.01461282,0.01828302,0.0021773663,0.01582162,0.010282283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023432456,0.0003775015,0.00045719914,0.0009243442,0.041441098,0.0074488097,0.0073924917,0.008623836,0.0012377405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014845353,0.000032039858,0.0009145242,0.000025095807,0.0000029545213,0.00032527905,0.026023224,0.000108110195,0.00019867523,0.9457847,0.016995491,0.009575156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007030223,0.00006877979,0.006807632,0.00076658715,0.00003671962,0.00073554256,0.08614321,0.0012149111,0.001609967,0.41596508,0.4864514,0.00012992152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15306883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14804298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15306883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010732235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013992734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30435574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789945070","doi":"","title":"Canada - Class action: The Superior Court of Québec rules that class action applicants can obtain access to the totality of the communications intercepted during the public inquiry (Ultramar ltée)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; False accusation; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Cartel; Political science; Law; Economics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Epistemology; State (computer science); Collusion","score_opus":0.12089144804366951,"score_gpt":0.3280649907917791,"score_spread":0.20717354274810956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789945070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052630242,0.007065054,0.005627501,0.104947306,0.0029390093,0.0011105025,0.0037156243,0.0003792124,0.8215856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29977903,0.001802551,0.003479394,0.085248224,0.00040712176,0.0003878118,0.0006658508,0.00011458585,0.60811543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846675,0.0010892628,0.0006388556,0.0016013448,0.007063511,0.0049393945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863413,0.003343837,0.0004979986,0.0008529077,0.007555191,0.0014088434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008444561,0.000604948,0.0007053894,0.001906866,0.02244994,0.011439124,0.0038646336,0.016993018,0.016948605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016134696,0.00086580904,0.0012833903,0.0023876238,0.0067317607,0.0024836042,0.0030391887,0.010833845,0.0026377724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008044993,0.00008706131,0.005894083,0.00019397217,0.0000550839,0.00066640176,0.006955337,0.0002548487,0.0016795268,0.504737,0.4528469,0.026549337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007603962,0.00004720786,0.015745202,0.00028933023,0.000089023524,0.0001645502,0.003258265,0.0003876536,0.0014495271,0.008650612,0.9696574,0.00018513796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9853726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06993192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06993192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17829637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50739396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792860342","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Supreme Court rules on the matter of standing to sue for damages held by indirect purchasers in class action proceedings (Pro-Sys Consultants / Microsoft)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Class action; Supreme court; Law; Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.020600476128208027,"score_gpt":0.23247632174760577,"score_spread":0.21187584561939773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792860342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015118184,0.0041553895,0.0038917495,0.10318715,0.0041209096,0.000644403,0.0060819373,0.00057260215,0.8622277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18852821,0.00355631,0.009899443,0.08838214,0.0010868134,0.00038672963,0.0028474827,0.00042628028,0.70488656],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97477835,0.0008778787,0.00095210073,0.0012081774,0.017341986,0.004841553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975962,0.0033920251,0.00043927412,0.0010509823,0.016804071,0.0023515588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00919673,0.0009666073,0.0009433837,0.0032628821,0.019324344,0.014193327,0.005591887,0.015568074,0.018522605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027852038,0.0017638416,0.0013321635,0.0034329793,0.00612084,0.0024329582,0.0028673739,0.01658928,0.005552478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029733652,0.000036858455,0.0015894672,0.000050957067,0.000021714886,0.00020143727,0.0012616205,0.0002276101,0.00069659716,0.1967483,0.78409064,0.015045093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007846433,0.000031508942,0.012762079,0.00043713415,0.00010580887,0.0001282553,0.0014825237,0.00071396166,0.0011141138,0.017124396,0.9657724,0.00024936363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9811141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06472075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06472075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22950093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4695841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795259350","doi":"","title":"Ontario's New Invasion of Privacy Torts: Do They Offer Monetary Redress for Violations Suffered via the Internet of Things?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Internet privacy; Hacker; Personally identifiable information; Business; Privacy laws of the United States; Privacy law; Computer security; Damages; Information privacy; Punitive damages; The Internet; Legislation; Public disclosure; Data breach; Privacy software; Tort; Privacy policy; Law; Liability; Computer science; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0887149804975094,"score_gpt":0.28294640461065873,"score_spread":0.19423142411314934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795259350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093700655,0.0045059794,0.008222625,0.09007389,0.00086815853,0.00030932907,0.00063748553,0.00016832203,0.80151355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7009694,0.006755843,0.004759362,0.035356566,0.000586535,0.00020453788,0.0002889818,0.00006474287,0.25101414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931491,0.0005217249,0.00019389727,0.00040714908,0.0043777204,0.0013503676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99330986,0.0024093487,0.0009206983,0.0007687892,0.0019674574,0.00062394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025655632,0.0003664552,0.00029012322,0.0010626778,0.009543706,0.0072477,0.0013211475,0.0061623533,0.0055852407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01351945,0.00047266853,0.0008509909,0.0017557315,0.008871418,0.005279966,0.0031212366,0.0046165395,0.00057970674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007905252,0.0000465653,0.016603164,0.00015452217,0.000027690196,0.0018506364,0.013757289,0.0003414867,0.0013874687,0.8469832,0.077857204,0.040911753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030812604,0.000060097587,0.03733198,0.00048078003,0.00010184477,0.0012125879,0.0076034153,0.0011571466,0.000978214,0.046764806,0.9041417,0.00013660139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7722149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88031435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22778511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030434947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03760646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45825315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800822049","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Supreme Court rules on the matter of standing to sue for damages held by indirect purchasers in class action proceedings (Infineon Technologies / Option Consommateurs)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Class action; Supreme court; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Law; Political science; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.018652666004652135,"score_gpt":0.22594725515482372,"score_spread":0.2072945891501716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800822049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01828778,0.003202334,0.0040182457,0.08918347,0.0039692065,0.00072971993,0.0057594124,0.0005441802,0.8743056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1960107,0.002721568,0.009252422,0.086699456,0.0009614062,0.00042723565,0.0023775264,0.00036413287,0.7011855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97429764,0.00088674296,0.00095663033,0.0013890268,0.016913475,0.005556568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802334,0.003328057,0.00035638703,0.0010224974,0.013157506,0.001902129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009634134,0.0010138062,0.0010051434,0.0031029356,0.020750675,0.014853772,0.0059447032,0.0178442,0.01863934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025159847,0.0019236441,0.00159731,0.0032534096,0.006351392,0.0025867256,0.0029529724,0.01852962,0.0052230014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042433705,0.0000479187,0.0017730499,0.000059051854,0.000028638025,0.00026710422,0.0015129332,0.00028409134,0.00091327116,0.2728998,0.70722216,0.014949562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009940689,0.00003775832,0.012073919,0.00041314683,0.00013196681,0.00013547408,0.0015395223,0.0008602257,0.0014665665,0.019776696,0.96316516,0.00030022007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9789587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07071688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07071688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20534036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5130893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804891416","doi":"","title":"Forum Selection Clauses and Consumer Contracts in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Roger Williams University - Digital Commons (Roger Williams University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Plaintiff; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Selection (genetic algorithm); Precedent; Business","score_opus":0.008023942056280684,"score_gpt":0.16296803087228676,"score_spread":0.15494408881600608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804891416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06470658,0.0024530676,0.0032327408,0.036206942,0.00023833482,0.00019138619,0.00024604794,0.000050745915,0.892674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89896613,0.0016247516,0.0016113645,0.016724693,0.00015617716,0.00016231865,0.00012420777,0.000039464467,0.08059098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850537,0.0019059201,0.0005329564,0.0012049502,0.0065014004,0.0048010396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98388034,0.008567404,0.0009072936,0.0007877736,0.004379787,0.0014773685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009539569,0.00034361222,0.000503981,0.0020427308,0.028325595,0.0117521025,0.0022752264,0.011662169,0.014191826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02282161,0.0008546836,0.00070869987,0.0033632896,0.016813206,0.0042407513,0.006325453,0.008350896,0.00066326256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013501922,0.000015085224,0.0011810818,0.000015985726,0.0000044947965,0.00017202034,0.0026839927,0.00021667553,0.00007573275,0.9798772,0.011540698,0.004203509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021550576,0.00006468873,0.014213323,0.00064132025,0.0000961123,0.00026728277,0.010466196,0.0043218248,0.0008354272,0.37080753,0.5978105,0.00026027672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9299373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9330516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078576386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.078576386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10978152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57011425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887306513","doi":"","title":"A comparative survey of legal awareness between Hong Kong and Canadian managers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HKBU Institutional Repository (Hong Kong Baptist University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.029733722698160117,"score_gpt":0.2121826243482199,"score_spread":0.18244890165005978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887306513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976273,0.0001515493,0.000013306681,0.0001471919,0.0000050086996,0.000011985821,0.00023646408,0.000001128089,0.0018061558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977985,0.0002388306,0.000033209308,0.00013564892,0.000003859527,0.00001282019,0.00016671234,0.0000015807792,0.0016088636],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875057,0.00018342136,0.00010535616,0.00011454825,0.0002774402,0.0005686778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99262226,0.0008315622,0.0018201924,0.00017455517,0.0025051048,0.0020463762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001337259,0.00023460486,0.00030686238,0.0020005382,0.0035193244,0.0021120994,0.00071205606,0.0004691162,0.0031588296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00382633,0.00033133547,0.00030597489,0.004700353,0.0012268586,0.0008670081,0.0010818163,0.00079186645,0.00036622823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010034192,0.00009683104,0.9392691,0.000052503772,0.000028400642,0.00020393504,0.05288327,0.000024919002,0.00020519667,0.00025538553,0.0011974417,0.0056827078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035815049,0.000051897605,0.9251,0.000035984332,0.000011636092,0.00003782262,0.07284289,0.00003368171,0.000048549606,0.000010937362,0.0018089892,0.000013992729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9408595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96531695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059140503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013496562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014406305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11897755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892604209","doi":"","title":"Informed Decision-making in Judicial Mediation and the Assessment of Litigation Risk","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Mediation; Framing (construction); Political science; Judicial opinion; Conversation; Litigation risk analysis; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Public relations; Business; Engineering; Accounting","score_opus":0.010376406813522298,"score_gpt":0.2481724362680288,"score_spread":0.23779602945450648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892604209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050531622,0.017141093,0.2904641,0.15401539,0.0017625545,0.0009836188,0.000087373344,0.00023489556,0.48477933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92099184,0.0037977905,0.055874065,0.0056438274,0.0006655512,0.00059421203,0.000034591245,0.00009703317,0.012301216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7659017,0.20063171,0.0058467467,0.005650879,0.014669225,0.007299751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8877247,0.09623123,0.005441738,0.0037531098,0.004878476,0.0019707817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13383482,0.0015568822,0.0014953975,0.0046915873,0.017759932,0.03749971,0.0054095625,0.017381584,0.008659593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14607413,0.0011486827,0.0017083619,0.0034823818,0.066629775,0.025442036,0.018374506,0.01392844,0.0010965274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002846234,0.000029991948,0.0003710513,0.00010224378,0.000026713527,0.00033705792,0.021124443,0.0014633368,0.00014398154,0.9617968,0.0018972434,0.012678632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025978483,0.000028400416,0.00022495663,0.00038269148,0.00001743717,0.000112653026,0.010717215,0.0015654447,0.0003410687,0.95750386,0.029023463,0.000056788835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057905754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006052339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13383482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013275798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020131394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70779467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W289858534","doi":"","title":"Review of R.P. Mulheron, the Modern Cy-Près Doctrine: Applications & Implications","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Class action; Settlement (finance); Class (philosophy); Law; Action (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Business; Epistemology; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.01284579838229124,"score_gpt":0.269787366769253,"score_spread":0.2569415683869618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W289858534","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000529237,0.9808411,0.00014073124,0.011564832,0.0026485787,0.0000031178997,0.000041929863,0.0000039590927,0.004702811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008307812,0.9867546,0.00014655993,0.006216149,0.0036833412,0.0000055967507,0.00005773923,0.000006322082,0.0022987963],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991665,0.00014451734,0.000080559075,0.00013027334,0.0004321205,0.000046150577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99552095,0.0022246228,0.0003493935,0.0001000404,0.0015950557,0.00020996755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017416186,0.0005724088,0.0012325223,0.0046365615,0.00075734884,0.00232183,0.00130619,0.0023890622,0.008195705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072859796,0.0004250258,0.00040141176,0.0071609747,0.0018345943,0.0035586215,0.0011258492,0.0033287373,0.0057041575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022537135,0.000021260239,0.00015870146,0.005044965,0.00003605252,0.00007725476,0.00015553589,0.00019288572,0.00014758826,0.020185338,0.7151429,0.25881496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030476376,0.0000072141393,0.0004374827,0.0023800817,0.0000132585365,0.00011593161,0.000056882523,0.00001662075,0.000029792362,0.0018372213,0.9950954,0.0000069678604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072073545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013232127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008195705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025364212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004679994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027417362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899859627","doi":"","title":"Public Policy is an Unruly Horse and the Law of Contract is an Ass: A Comment on Douez v Facebook, Inc","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Boilerplate text; Supreme court; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Legislature; Jurisprudence; Freedom of contract; Choice of law; Legal doctrine; Public interest; Law and economics; Sociology; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.03073184135447818,"score_gpt":0.27234925488621986,"score_spread":0.24161741353174168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899859627","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016878968,0.0024692544,0.00094707764,0.837831,0.0022207093,0.000077360055,0.00032709158,0.000083698425,0.13916488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15012157,0.0009649315,0.000795516,0.78976893,0.0018892208,0.0001316061,0.000075402386,0.00006472726,0.056188013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929536,0.0010695503,0.0003366974,0.0012189547,0.0023244454,0.0020968118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905772,0.0065060263,0.0003120878,0.00035702408,0.0015728638,0.0006747734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052779256,0.0006637963,0.00086305663,0.0008936372,0.023474509,0.011152409,0.0044380757,0.05931159,0.0052895215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015814494,0.0009769022,0.0013723981,0.001388647,0.015234772,0.0048295157,0.0031439418,0.028502485,0.0013338831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007302263,0.00003332069,0.0015968207,0.000060285365,0.000019970988,0.00096203404,0.009183864,0.00022632955,0.0003985085,0.6082673,0.37438667,0.0047918377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014020728,0.00004815968,0.0047540427,0.00040052182,0.00012611863,0.00044495505,0.012367734,0.0015223906,0.0015258851,0.06777518,0.9105939,0.00030089496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7180001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7982365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7180001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02644963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030791385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5673213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902103393","doi":"","title":"Ethical and Legal Issues in E-Discovery of Facebook Evidence in Civil Litigation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of law and technology","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Civil litigation; Political science; Duty; Legal ethics; Professional conduct; Law; Civil procedure; Professional responsibility; Public relations","score_opus":0.029156092260276347,"score_gpt":0.2760850121796816,"score_spread":0.24692891991940527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902103393","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070010945,0.015929159,0.028313618,0.562317,0.00086643995,0.00039623276,0.000103203034,0.00009872367,0.32196465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.901803,0.008844195,0.024009962,0.042518023,0.0008506271,0.0002615315,0.00005022123,0.000050799463,0.021611474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.89248496,0.066764265,0.0046216226,0.0035576106,0.024352958,0.008218648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8492213,0.12343355,0.00519646,0.006173274,0.011992716,0.0039826497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.063541606,0.0003883579,0.0005992442,0.0033686499,0.03275591,0.03444417,0.0031939873,0.020689353,0.0022122157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09984214,0.00076684245,0.00075800484,0.0036202027,0.052427787,0.014826696,0.01145163,0.008916063,0.00054869987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027045902,0.00006360174,0.004002632,0.00017391937,0.000018010252,0.0028906427,0.061748367,0.0005626868,0.00038727743,0.86102265,0.019847265,0.04925584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003363124,0.000056229634,0.0060254936,0.0026660813,0.00006410349,0.004567332,0.17269729,0.002315289,0.0019784106,0.43122882,0.378171,0.00019624592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19390129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29400137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19390129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02418237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06365065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3855453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913050508","doi":"","title":"PUBLIC POLICY IS AN UNRULY HORSE AND THE LAW OF CONTRACT IS AN ASS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Boilerplate text; Supreme court; Law; Doctrine; Legislature; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.06346364556507723,"score_gpt":0.28204363402229554,"score_spread":0.21857998845721832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913050508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013589264,0.0149078695,0.008512159,0.27071145,0.0016008058,0.00006641677,0.00016449064,0.000068655485,0.6903789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77821165,0.009893487,0.0044806004,0.08136589,0.0024626786,0.00014254951,0.0001431806,0.000096980395,0.123202965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9724973,0.0073247096,0.00082569284,0.0028641496,0.012568107,0.003920032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882569,0.006032393,0.00069132017,0.0014868719,0.0028095108,0.000723085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012014248,0.0004090144,0.0006409892,0.0014466046,0.015930548,0.017022299,0.0020154926,0.015457501,0.0060579493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020210553,0.0005422423,0.0007051734,0.0017591999,0.05427266,0.008521389,0.0033985788,0.012265445,0.0012487248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024582835,0.0000026094574,0.00006684835,0.000010755973,0.0000017887924,0.000027436965,0.000573394,0.000036942663,0.000022855702,0.9890219,0.008298034,0.0019349015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001888151,0.000012210717,0.0009816767,0.00029575976,0.000020723643,0.0000963868,0.0022166567,0.00035859633,0.00021147702,0.46040952,0.53533375,0.000044361932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45908245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41168454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5409175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027676472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05815281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9128206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913521190","doi":"","title":"Data Driven Innovation, Privacy and National Sovereignty in a Global World-Two 2018 Key Cases on Internet Jurisdition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Key (lock); The Internet; Internet privacy; Information privacy; Business; Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Law; World Wide Web; Politics","score_opus":0.10067616144082583,"score_gpt":0.32386099173348226,"score_spread":0.22318483029265643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913521190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06713348,0.004916777,0.0025285226,0.09246467,0.0008123014,0.000084480154,0.00014140763,0.000033983433,0.8318844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8587299,0.003369402,0.0016686002,0.03785388,0.0011753355,0.00030411588,0.00012956494,0.000047190988,0.09672188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944061,0.0017554718,0.00021690635,0.0005718298,0.0018723408,0.0011773447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603844,0.002665708,0.00031709863,0.0003653952,0.0003337238,0.00027948254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004585962,0.00037351562,0.0003347809,0.0011661918,0.009068058,0.01581813,0.001444544,0.009769598,0.004975445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008002162,0.00024156262,0.00048281794,0.0020713282,0.02106843,0.00782836,0.009133493,0.01079466,0.0007541264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065462027,0.000015321624,0.00038388095,0.000014463563,0.000001258226,0.00031621818,0.0050142584,0.00005455411,0.000056632703,0.9797152,0.011517424,0.0029041385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026323165,0.00003513806,0.0026043623,0.0004971736,0.000017548826,0.00063169026,0.017138934,0.0006132194,0.0011931641,0.3255797,0.65160537,0.000057401114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016373593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018447055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016373593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068675983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004514871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04982817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W291410679","doi":"","title":"Canada's internet law in a nutshell","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Carswell eBooks","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.011168846579608486,"score_gpt":0.17988372998131297,"score_spread":0.16871488340170449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W291410679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005828426,0.005197275,0.0016295289,0.0877841,0.0014289038,0.00006681023,0.0013058953,0.00023937783,0.8965198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08281396,0.005821719,0.0020417639,0.03948026,0.00046176923,0.00006958527,0.0004865882,0.00023493408,0.8685893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956808,0.00018151905,0.000073553674,0.00030774213,0.0026904973,0.0010658602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969805,0.0004068193,0.000064290005,0.00014971729,0.0017900171,0.00060865335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001122083,0.0005851034,0.00045974308,0.0030895597,0.012634665,0.017728135,0.0022630943,0.009497934,0.031009255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051045166,0.00073201,0.00065099145,0.0044505997,0.0069520534,0.004440624,0.0021472536,0.007151722,0.0039046414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009534331,0.000022312403,0.0005267433,0.000034795834,0.0000061529568,0.00011702989,0.0005790953,0.0002700222,0.000087996326,0.5649022,0.41743323,0.016010933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011087308,0.000006441637,0.0013807297,0.00014327811,0.00001184447,0.00005897667,0.0008728161,0.0003142396,0.00014060136,0.026724588,0.9702973,0.000038049344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99219173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99590623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08910992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08910992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19307496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64654076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918473456","doi":"10.5539/ass.v15n3p46","title":"The Discourse Analysis of Social Factors Influencing Interest Contention in Business Dispute Settlement: A Perspective of Discourse Information Theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Zhongyuan University of Technology","keywords":"Negotiation; Mediation; Settlement (finance); Public relations; Context (archaeology); Dispute resolution; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Business; Law","score_opus":0.012963783234556181,"score_gpt":0.28588388816984045,"score_spread":0.2729201049352843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918473456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49321067,0.00783212,0.19539078,0.03512514,0.00056169595,0.00073160796,0.00045430212,0.00013195035,0.26656178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861108,0.00088853744,0.010324249,0.00030099478,0.00010026153,0.00016123078,0.00008928635,0.000031277963,0.0019933921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873082,0.008909137,0.000543065,0.00073109515,0.0019670743,0.0005413901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691069,0.025878996,0.0021593072,0.00078935793,0.0016410272,0.0004243049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011002762,0.00082300726,0.000701962,0.006988686,0.0064784717,0.01215563,0.0016765185,0.0028107797,0.0031396092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022092316,0.00044048845,0.00073182373,0.0062419544,0.019417016,0.017458085,0.0058037457,0.0032156024,0.00027073175],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006385423,0.00006360098,0.0024606665,0.0003088904,0.000022409045,0.00085646653,0.32687613,0.00048284244,0.0013289665,0.6502641,0.0008303941,0.016441727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005351503,0.00007251924,0.0062092734,0.0008090696,0.000088252404,0.00057921984,0.41129473,0.008561417,0.0029418466,0.50568885,0.063603655,0.000097729935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033908498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017402257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01215563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076029217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004433778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058188856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920713456","doi":"10.5553/ijodr/235250022019006001004","title":"Mobile Online Dispute Resolution Tools’ Potential Applications for Government Offices","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Online dispute resolution; Government (linguistics); Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Business; Computer security; Telecommunications; Internet privacy; Computer science; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015022741417569874,"score_gpt":0.27983022920628,"score_spread":0.2648074877887101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920713456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46166334,0.004738782,0.02742314,0.027295448,0.000333116,0.0006939371,0.00040210594,0.0012204928,0.47622955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9488799,0.0022113419,0.02893058,0.0008982626,0.0002718644,0.00029538426,0.00018818733,0.00005790895,0.018266551],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970168,0.0019407806,0.0001103822,0.00009263627,0.00050158467,0.00033780237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99024135,0.006326547,0.0009611344,0.0010037802,0.0006867444,0.00078041555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00354799,0.00021406462,0.00017007158,0.001258896,0.0016533753,0.0041138325,0.0009943297,0.0013187947,0.0283369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010949348,0.00017611598,0.00047135339,0.0012778747,0.00082012935,0.0047755395,0.0032382847,0.00077836146,0.0030423487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021139017,0.00064725353,0.0104788095,0.0005338915,0.0000140769025,0.001047969,0.018779432,0.000386228,0.0027928092,0.03635264,0.017720977,0.9110346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019560619,0.0013586537,0.04412557,0.0018473326,0.000073372685,0.0028672155,0.06000479,0.004032168,0.004404192,0.029598556,0.8513817,0.00011089885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007219786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018577459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0283369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089961744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012958883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09479642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920897800","doi":"","title":"The Ontario Superior Court holds that misleading information can trigger class actions as a breach of the Competition Act (Rebuck / Ford Motor)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Competition (biology); Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.015607779308719373,"score_gpt":0.2161136998357288,"score_spread":0.20050592052700944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920897800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038618494,0.0010274646,0.0026354701,0.056701064,0.0007863946,0.00072582404,0.0021178708,0.000232061,0.89715534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5178079,0.0012478497,0.0048439344,0.041632693,0.00039015035,0.0004550501,0.00064153346,0.00011660324,0.43286425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811291,0.0011283773,0.0008565507,0.0010617991,0.011730258,0.004094005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801675,0.00583002,0.0013292818,0.0010725175,0.010285314,0.0013153912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055445745,0.0005388046,0.0005367924,0.0016569659,0.02039186,0.009285846,0.0022916475,0.0130788395,0.020886762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02713014,0.0011761131,0.0008379986,0.001815496,0.0073825894,0.002270997,0.0024153143,0.007262688,0.0033168162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017294534,0.00006869312,0.012091026,0.0002206596,0.000040866493,0.0027032893,0.012683591,0.0005497801,0.0027140419,0.5318085,0.41711822,0.019828292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012036322,0.000050649414,0.021164108,0.00032627178,0.00013025703,0.00054985745,0.003914141,0.0009558102,0.0019908126,0.01774027,0.95284474,0.00021262854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97053695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98781174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97053695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053392597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12636262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38739222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922319483","doi":"","title":"Skating to Where the Puck Will Be: Exploring Settlement Counsel and Risk Analysis in the Negotiation of Business Disputes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Settlement (finance); Adversarial system; Function (biology); Realm; Business; Law; Work (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Engineering; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.012582604159995311,"score_gpt":0.21420144692476958,"score_spread":0.20161884276477426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922319483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29051054,0.0048455256,0.2962868,0.062484793,0.0003685563,0.00034832084,0.00004630051,0.00013535489,0.34497386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726857,0.0011283894,0.015336203,0.00080733455,0.0000894793,0.00008955596,0.000009700485,0.000035550238,0.009817945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9744184,0.021368476,0.0003333659,0.0006736495,0.0018627043,0.0013433455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683509,0.02720916,0.0019446487,0.00061130716,0.0010842102,0.00079982507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023098245,0.0005202953,0.0007271113,0.003511989,0.011357468,0.02100664,0.0027142419,0.009872441,0.008540292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034564964,0.0005185046,0.0006956732,0.0030566324,0.034069303,0.018861603,0.009697837,0.006516526,0.001012656],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018789626,0.000066407585,0.0006967013,0.00004333192,0.0000063767848,0.00033523707,0.05194252,0.0009586145,0.00007876281,0.9292165,0.00080586836,0.015830828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039389794,0.000063206615,0.0009785745,0.00031820798,0.000017842942,0.0005626103,0.1659999,0.012698259,0.00047314816,0.7838664,0.034934346,0.00004816294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005073847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056313304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023098245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008858368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008126761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12215668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937100179","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v9n3p176","title":"The Discourse Analysis of Psychological Factors Influencing Interest Contention in Business Dispute Settlement: A Perspective of Discourse Information Theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Zhongyuan University of Technology","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Settlement (finance); Context (archaeology); Affect (linguistics); Public relations; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.019920524164534128,"score_gpt":0.31755546901383014,"score_spread":0.29763494484929603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937100179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63478583,0.004528308,0.14741139,0.027563937,0.00039327084,0.000546894,0.00025530974,0.00009602353,0.184419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915965,0.00043839993,0.0063767564,0.00026574786,0.00005262016,0.00010267148,0.00004855235,0.000018614883,0.0011001646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98686755,0.009416181,0.00055080454,0.00070527184,0.0019357144,0.00052443007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96102595,0.03292165,0.002712627,0.00087900634,0.0019256899,0.0005351136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012395552,0.00065286225,0.0006053731,0.005103107,0.005653922,0.010528774,0.0015986275,0.0026141019,0.0029841552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029784169,0.00042774418,0.0006312419,0.0044385963,0.018883163,0.015989417,0.005372451,0.003986545,0.00022174788],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009629047,0.000101232814,0.0032909645,0.00035092956,0.000023947001,0.00067151326,0.4671181,0.0003581718,0.0019722967,0.5102438,0.0006682937,0.015104489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006835362,0.00009403617,0.008931685,0.00069441396,0.0000782331,0.0005514561,0.54685044,0.006460257,0.0034249718,0.39393482,0.038807012,0.000104378225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024802312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012123857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012395552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057947417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036063434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06555468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945579649","doi":"","title":"Certainty of Persuasive Appeal","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MacEwan University Student Research Proceedings","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Appeal; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.10002770184599738,"score_gpt":0.3528065769200506,"score_spread":0.25277887507405317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945579649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2591291,0.0046669426,0.09783256,0.014631685,0.0008300926,0.0004337802,0.0007464121,0.00042136063,0.62130797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930235,0.0002567579,0.0021415916,0.0003271951,0.00030091757,0.000065154,0.00009962731,0.000040744304,0.003744348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9738584,0.0075311125,0.0019959332,0.0043074717,0.010540639,0.0017663353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7686276,0.17740038,0.014841448,0.017976502,0.01741321,0.0037408504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019653248,0.00073927344,0.0018902357,0.0039508,0.0024156694,0.010990191,0.0017922992,0.0047602826,0.025095468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2792511,0.0011715312,0.0012872522,0.0014584048,0.004549397,0.014544612,0.0041523282,0.006482014,0.001816139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012962196,0.00030459682,0.011901639,0.0004846902,0.00027007976,0.00032819467,0.004436141,0.0041349833,0.0009986641,0.9114242,0.004332277,0.060088325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013304266,0.00022639177,0.010228245,0.00012060038,0.0002409436,0.00051349314,0.0014255552,0.010192873,0.0008435253,0.96844447,0.0075503984,0.00008042418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018307413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010871368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025095468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002855237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017210314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10393757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946504863","doi":"","title":"Access to Commercial Justice: A Roadmap for Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Design for Small and Medium-Sized Businesses (SMEs) Disputes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Online dispute resolution; Business; Dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Predictability; Alternative dispute resolution; Field (mathematics); Resolution (logic); Industrial organization; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.05184424021081379,"score_gpt":0.31426361569070344,"score_spread":0.26241937547988964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946504863","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04046765,0.0017652493,0.7569925,0.035930544,0.0007982561,0.003397918,0.0003617327,0.005157132,0.15512903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33239123,0.001728603,0.62301123,0.0038411643,0.0005194649,0.003212046,0.00068541453,0.0012756486,0.033335086],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97095156,0.020841395,0.00135554,0.0010540492,0.004602958,0.0011944132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93311286,0.036441106,0.00291515,0.008028342,0.013039025,0.006463449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032033052,0.00072827487,0.0006891812,0.0025989423,0.0035003154,0.016925225,0.004502439,0.003726875,0.061077345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07147511,0.00085553696,0.0009353863,0.0016244187,0.0038960143,0.025164835,0.009519409,0.0038149832,0.0077915983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052635866,0.0020259211,0.004108185,0.0008340026,0.000042178,0.0002790159,0.009566079,0.0024351974,0.0030032215,0.24315344,0.03591022,0.6981162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063321146,0.0018046662,0.003024058,0.0014915784,0.00014232876,0.0006323313,0.022682171,0.055053018,0.0048284964,0.49228436,0.41719338,0.00023038786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018767205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031719333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061077345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002176719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067815348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20432407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947740181","doi":"","title":"OVERCOMING THE BARRIERS TO ENVIRONMENTAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN CANADA","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Limiting; Resolution (logic); Political science; Alternative dispute resolution; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Business; Geography; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.016246230771807826,"score_gpt":0.1890343635667311,"score_spread":0.17278813279492328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947740181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23838791,0.09272323,0.0050115683,0.2238026,0.002127657,0.0002960046,0.00060393807,0.0001465417,0.43690056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9078124,0.039907932,0.004071585,0.016512305,0.00031599574,0.00006612484,0.00023948343,0.000047234767,0.031026902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.971484,0.0027683778,0.0010155031,0.0009236999,0.017981442,0.0058269133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94289935,0.014239003,0.0035353294,0.00081787753,0.035846908,0.0026615078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013418258,0.00022557523,0.0005687044,0.005848347,0.018693047,0.0128046395,0.002772314,0.0026756998,0.003215182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039836932,0.0005087548,0.00051844626,0.0090016,0.005790949,0.0030490335,0.0038409198,0.003711641,0.00022300392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011498777,0.000110596695,0.03282314,0.0016203556,0.00008559472,0.0016184275,0.027130261,0.003739665,0.0007849704,0.516205,0.13728476,0.27848232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037446658,0.00005842832,0.052912902,0.0014102623,0.00011835535,0.0004424006,0.027820619,0.0026027078,0.0008742599,0.012833564,0.9006733,0.00021573225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98874474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122109964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.122109964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2299834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88597393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949051790","doi":"","title":"A DISPUTED ALTERNATIVE TO ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION - A DISCUSSION OF CLASS-WIDE ARBITRATION AND ITS RELEVANCE FOR QUEBEC CLASS ACTION LITIGANTS AND PRACTITIONERS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Class action; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Compulsory arbitration; Dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Damages; Relevance (law); Civil procedure; Class (philosophy); Consolidation (business); Alternative dispute resolution; Law and economics; Sociology; State (computer science); Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.036205248364237365,"score_gpt":0.2909591379021896,"score_spread":0.2547538895379522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949051790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030241728,0.041869663,0.052080672,0.11855377,0.0010084602,0.00016190004,0.0001393131,0.000056410157,0.7558881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91019505,0.010043866,0.0150658935,0.008402065,0.00047888508,0.00016873199,0.000046812216,0.00003736494,0.05556125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.981417,0.00772056,0.0005350926,0.0011428305,0.006370465,0.0028139711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930032,0.0037104113,0.00039505956,0.0005303534,0.0019956348,0.00036535782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016147198,0.0005573457,0.00078047125,0.0036448403,0.015058505,0.017571697,0.006282214,0.00985301,0.007883883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01941013,0.00041095726,0.0011993959,0.0040350775,0.029795354,0.0058192755,0.0050809165,0.0073496355,0.0005027151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031886473,0.000004065806,0.000079963036,0.000014174624,0.000002060914,0.00008625197,0.00074521377,0.00021800271,0.000027978422,0.9930478,0.0016186555,0.0041526393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043207492,0.00003558625,0.002208705,0.0008750519,0.000034639845,0.0006546034,0.0065632123,0.010026207,0.00040607437,0.5886961,0.3903231,0.00013354972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72848535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77372956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27151465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060671087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02770689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54622734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949157537","doi":"10.1080/17441048.2019.1599773","title":"Understanding public policy limits to the enforceability of forum selection clauses after <i>Douez v Facebook</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Political science; Supreme court; Doctrine; Public policy; Law; Selection (genetic algorithm); Law and economics; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0513721871613127,"score_gpt":0.27256223669674323,"score_spread":0.22119004953543053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949157537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3216352,0.0030418206,0.023222793,0.061265424,0.000530274,0.00021978303,0.00024155474,0.0001268274,0.58971626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97886974,0.00043878175,0.0017934984,0.007918915,0.00015232433,0.00012524685,0.000037094214,0.000027459975,0.010636894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98470795,0.00288409,0.00070978585,0.0024705587,0.0049806996,0.0042468742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774606,0.015770394,0.0018944744,0.0017345542,0.0025164648,0.00062356767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019593187,0.00027752592,0.00058571773,0.0015266126,0.010894268,0.016457211,0.003296752,0.0115366345,0.0033360254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034882113,0.0006293257,0.00066696637,0.0010099857,0.018545771,0.00906559,0.005772001,0.0103924135,0.00035162142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021130927,0.00002151464,0.0015133955,0.000021415726,0.000006368236,0.0002386791,0.004561374,0.00034168814,0.00042537425,0.9863945,0.0025342815,0.0039202957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012388632,0.00010743257,0.015219643,0.0008397478,0.00012012123,0.0003862838,0.023050254,0.004458328,0.0053007733,0.7222843,0.22785655,0.00025260338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1668123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20021991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1668123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01877163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016819766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33168268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952010171","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.cs/0109012","title":"Is There a There There: Towards Greater Certainty for Internet Jurisdiction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ArXiv.org","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; The Internet; Jurisdiction; Medicine; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06623821766272882,"score_gpt":0.2806171493879487,"score_spread":0.21437893172521988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952010171","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2740493,0.0029990976,0.3370713,0.11845588,0.0004893628,0.00022524249,0.0002833479,0.0003050843,0.2661213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98593265,0.00036541116,0.010092063,0.0018381897,0.00015237456,0.000033486103,0.000027713659,0.000029714163,0.0015283985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96735495,0.014216029,0.0018048169,0.0041676797,0.010351474,0.00210501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91759986,0.044264186,0.013699669,0.013730499,0.008675538,0.0020302464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03361688,0.00030308493,0.001107203,0.0030477988,0.0046612737,0.02118321,0.0025598516,0.0072023375,0.007070772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11736274,0.0005678047,0.0011231947,0.002381215,0.024677895,0.045513492,0.010299581,0.009134515,0.00081542856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034148892,0.000021703398,0.002607957,0.00004909732,0.000017961356,0.00009930803,0.0026601148,0.0009818696,0.00020742408,0.9710533,0.0009916882,0.021275453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014190769,0.000034151177,0.0020038672,0.00018799402,0.000028692783,0.00013002793,0.0032525046,0.0045191017,0.0007875469,0.9733472,0.01565408,0.000040581253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052696955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033277296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03361688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053123464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00757996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17778522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955187526","doi":"","title":"SESSION 3.2: Where Is the Internet? Judicial Responses in British Columbia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); The Internet; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01135363771269555,"score_gpt":0.22834303735038222,"score_spread":0.21698939963768668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955187526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26593944,0.0076701106,0.00069099164,0.1795956,0.0034496838,0.0008209321,0.004167817,0.00022757602,0.5374379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45253322,0.0023590196,0.00043648572,0.024331572,0.00038815124,0.00026091342,0.0015851883,0.00006918906,0.51803625],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971745,0.00043803302,0.00008208761,0.00023271969,0.00060661335,0.0014660127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99358386,0.0020109077,0.0001736909,0.0001486299,0.002254233,0.0018287431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003931217,0.00023690096,0.00045056525,0.0016265413,0.022022208,0.007106616,0.0017564947,0.007143171,0.04306692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005891555,0.00029088155,0.0002818029,0.0015248808,0.00242103,0.0015892863,0.0026711826,0.0039850227,0.0039571887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004084466,0.00027276465,0.0155959595,0.00044310399,0.00002624517,0.0018070594,0.023294665,0.00034683145,0.002896895,0.016345479,0.8977848,0.04077768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000749875,0.0000428031,0.06933414,0.00048493067,0.000027310665,0.00009792665,0.061838154,0.00040438838,0.0013102139,0.002658007,0.8636313,0.000095881755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9398753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98591423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060124695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039718714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06806868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28818083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955947169","doi":"","title":"A Delicate Balance: Defining the Line Between Open Civil Proceedings and the Protection of Children in the Online Digital Era","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Line (geometry); Law and economics; Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Law; Internet privacy; Sociology; Medicine; Mathematics; Physical medicine and rehabilitation","score_opus":0.02057004563540449,"score_gpt":0.24902814124606268,"score_spread":0.2284580956106582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955947169","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03945945,0.015554187,0.013805075,0.53169405,0.0025644312,0.00014825046,0.000056533467,0.00010124015,0.39661685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83984745,0.005035423,0.0056322524,0.11824356,0.0016727624,0.0002950179,0.000029535275,0.00017184168,0.029072147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97114605,0.016214987,0.00087972364,0.0024068905,0.004157675,0.0051947553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96078134,0.025402255,0.0025921816,0.0024317026,0.003209546,0.0055829263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022561166,0.0005311582,0.0006225114,0.0024111944,0.027727243,0.03670108,0.0038739482,0.019224474,0.0075325184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044554263,0.0007085999,0.0005179015,0.0012636087,0.11525265,0.033424985,0.022875275,0.023815835,0.0011345942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020010377,0.00002870802,0.0011504854,0.00005410618,0.000005725654,0.00029282822,0.04159939,0.00007024011,0.00010501919,0.9230126,0.019714294,0.013946606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002626579,0.000081938604,0.0026506481,0.0023009954,0.000025805832,0.00067486055,0.123749234,0.00021880718,0.0006189807,0.45627987,0.41327953,0.000093074144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041436307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06385482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041436307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014955245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03166748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11931628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956128234","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1362","title":"There Is a There There: Forum Selection Clauses, Consumer Protection and the Quasi-Constitutional Right to Privacy in Douez v. Facebook","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Privacy policy; Internet privacy; Consumer protection; Business; Service provider; Supreme court; Power (physics); Vulnerability (computing); Consumer privacy; Information privacy; Service (business); Political science; Law; Computer security; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.020385955675059235,"score_gpt":0.2523212359180849,"score_spread":0.23193528024302568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956128234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14638796,0.0061493893,0.007496942,0.1273016,0.0009887394,0.00025689238,0.00059359986,0.00008565542,0.71073925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92133576,0.0008578153,0.0016348836,0.026765024,0.00028470895,0.00017254133,0.000077709374,0.00003144813,0.048840135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99146396,0.0021315827,0.00032380066,0.0012480838,0.00268007,0.0021523703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99249333,0.0050289626,0.00043102354,0.00050592894,0.0010378958,0.0005029536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0116665065,0.00042106202,0.0005708,0.0012901464,0.014597482,0.012760454,0.0027361405,0.015004545,0.004157823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014205167,0.0006583058,0.00080136466,0.0012974383,0.016934333,0.0055636554,0.0044678985,0.009024073,0.00045075215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018106033,0.000013676813,0.0006854037,0.000014257227,0.0000050628196,0.00016818749,0.00241052,0.0000885647,0.00015022566,0.9844781,0.009416585,0.002551302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020870406,0.00007607328,0.008647157,0.00053816783,0.00014077747,0.0003060091,0.011217114,0.0017399994,0.002923059,0.5231504,0.45080194,0.00025060627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4777824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55881417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52221763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017468417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025623426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9500028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968666194","doi":"","title":"Chat Blackberry: il sistema “pin to pin”. Nascita di un nuovo paradiso processuale","year":2016,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Archivio Penale","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.017817408907101893,"score_gpt":0.23256840650807512,"score_spread":0.21475099760097321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968666194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05878797,0.002327053,0.056378506,0.020055186,0.0021154855,0.00043343756,0.001331023,0.0071286955,0.85144275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38910234,0.0012134813,0.024981106,0.003697517,0.0008261479,0.00034360075,0.0014561825,0.0019121598,0.57646745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794453,0.00057660084,0.00006817888,0.00036604347,0.0008121386,0.00023244384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99638087,0.0008471069,0.00026290017,0.0012587404,0.0008107153,0.0004397873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002071704,0.0005009531,0.0002356381,0.0012484293,0.0039615026,0.006494989,0.0014457867,0.0018644806,0.0536296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006262773,0.00036208006,0.00024896985,0.0012124105,0.004294977,0.0077254283,0.005308271,0.002332682,0.013210931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004306273,0.000112954614,0.004071178,0.00031841407,0.000018297618,0.0009187938,0.014046565,0.0005674553,0.0071515883,0.4435804,0.2336099,0.29517385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016556607,0.00006919236,0.002524254,0.0001202778,0.000009339838,0.0003061088,0.0019001209,0.0012044213,0.0025203042,0.014904858,0.9763889,0.000035622066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009430007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015047583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0536296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019467209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024101266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17940891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971463373","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3390","title":"Re-Imagining Resolution of Online Defamation Disputes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Online dispute resolution; Intermediary; Dispute resolution; Dispute mechanism; Alternative dispute resolution; Tribunal; Economic Justice; Business; Law; Action (physics); Resolution (logic); Law and economics; Dispute board; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.017005535639495348,"score_gpt":0.24047460801974674,"score_spread":0.22346907238025138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971463373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04768609,0.009893919,0.15464588,0.2322182,0.0042796223,0.00029722406,0.000086360225,0.00038079108,0.5505119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8502835,0.0053799995,0.061198793,0.018945696,0.0023311253,0.00026667913,0.00008891106,0.00034695512,0.06115829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.954333,0.029430768,0.002029864,0.0027601912,0.008138589,0.003307632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94576573,0.03958574,0.0028185279,0.005792116,0.00420319,0.001834742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030933307,0.00074816635,0.00087105104,0.002746611,0.012109309,0.035311896,0.0054056384,0.016531844,0.017707048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07830092,0.0006419782,0.0012963401,0.001677154,0.038072288,0.052683182,0.018641323,0.017981106,0.0038153077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021851158,0.00004835641,0.00032094368,0.00013797206,0.000009827302,0.00046773732,0.018641626,0.00051833113,0.0003767138,0.943482,0.009001977,0.026972637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031360316,0.0000493704,0.0002872065,0.00074278197,0.000020418614,0.0007377917,0.03249559,0.0034882298,0.001566002,0.6077114,0.35281,0.000059881702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003372337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039140335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035311896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006323802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062480737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16359293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978683314","doi":"","title":"Class Actions in Canada:: The Promise and Reality of Access to Justice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.034714270771525196,"score_gpt":0.2697260425167119,"score_spread":0.2350117717451867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978683314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11393986,0.023834083,0.0020826145,0.38295293,0.0011990798,0.000095161355,0.00078817765,0.000089483336,0.47501865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9195834,0.008153663,0.0008693272,0.02112042,0.00020484156,0.000042709158,0.00013839484,0.000058966016,0.049828205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889269,0.0010403666,0.00019783844,0.00074257335,0.004229682,0.004862701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99105245,0.0014917685,0.00053427735,0.0003036964,0.0023708683,0.004246935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003502187,0.00029348055,0.000508218,0.001668208,0.04020792,0.0186696,0.003313046,0.006728529,0.010089515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012654465,0.00041599647,0.0003903584,0.0036165044,0.02168278,0.0047555543,0.0076567065,0.009458655,0.0004379433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005405388,0.00004494144,0.010544208,0.00018808575,0.000032762266,0.00080764823,0.052655593,0.0004628964,0.00026968415,0.7337971,0.12745018,0.073692866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003498682,0.000029135506,0.036143277,0.0008524689,0.000046483292,0.00030213484,0.08397227,0.00094981544,0.0003144715,0.06326574,0.81387246,0.00021675088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99713695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20873955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20873955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33509886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992437048","doi":"","title":"Mediation Outcomes: Lawyers' Experience with Commercial and Construction Mediation in the United Kingdom","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Dispute mechanism; Compromise; Conciliation; Lawyer supported mediation; Settlement (finance); Civil procedure; Dispute board; Party-directed mediation; Family mediation; Online dispute resolution; Law; Public relations; Political science; Opposition (politics); Order (exchange); Strengths and weaknesses; Business; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.019648284962514636,"score_gpt":0.22160667968339642,"score_spread":0.20195839472088178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992437048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9721068,0.0018154528,0.00083028997,0.004333795,0.00008470831,0.00013139915,0.000044289412,0.000030290734,0.020623026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99067944,0.0007218062,0.00035212009,0.00063234114,0.000015519709,0.000037141403,0.000027466021,0.0000226747,0.0075114616],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97876877,0.013746193,0.00080361374,0.00092534465,0.0024656004,0.0032904516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97394025,0.01611749,0.0027352923,0.00097185746,0.0030979642,0.0031371138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01150212,0.00040740258,0.00072841445,0.0013104203,0.019148404,0.009526921,0.0025339033,0.0040742434,0.013954241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039066833,0.00066794123,0.00034781336,0.0019721913,0.0064822077,0.004067873,0.009678714,0.004124454,0.0014174255],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018222764,0.00026924847,0.0064202426,0.00022635661,0.00001335497,0.006331647,0.9576723,0.00019991986,0.0009763435,0.00424509,0.0023732446,0.021090098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022749571,0.00021883065,0.005710434,0.00016992564,0.00001062928,0.0013358308,0.94659996,0.00019463518,0.00048890396,0.00052372465,0.04468535,0.000039101607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056010462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.118226804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056010462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011933792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074408078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111368895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992951926","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canadian Legislation, Court & Related Information Online (Highlighting Open Access Options): Alberta","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Internet privacy; Business; Access to information; Political science; Law; Information access; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.09027872577007592,"score_gpt":0.3772550726646379,"score_spread":0.286976346894562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992951926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026550982,0.0028464296,0.0010163705,0.011733711,0.0012769619,0.0010327733,0.09576986,0.0009879913,0.8826807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005391545,0.0018625362,0.0013759555,0.0014937801,0.000099026285,0.00029474322,0.010070384,0.000279911,0.9791323],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800545,0.00010452842,0.000092577466,0.0001405247,0.0013314644,0.00032558598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98688275,0.0021129525,0.00020588533,0.00034964507,0.009428784,0.0010199127],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026315877,0.00070764136,0.0005450732,0.007522028,0.008020275,0.006411751,0.0017852045,0.003209888,0.29559392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008433771,0.0010092618,0.00039353952,0.012899029,0.0015642466,0.0023005304,0.0012568795,0.0023966169,0.05483044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070297174,0.00001594548,0.00024404265,0.00007744125,5.5022684e-7,0.000021403768,0.00022872878,0.000055299657,0.000043374617,0.0031486538,0.9850225,0.011135016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010126302,0.000005077786,0.0050674323,0.00021284648,0.0000043708137,0.000015670841,0.0011366996,0.00009170675,0.00012832438,0.00091187935,0.9923993,0.000016662365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9751247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99358827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038785014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1404599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997858797","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Supreme Court expands the scope of potential liability in price-fixing class actions (Pioneer / Godfrey)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Scope (computer science); Law; Liability; Political science; Class (philosophy); Law and economics; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.010747301916298255,"score_gpt":0.21330146687092097,"score_spread":0.20255416495462272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997858797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032316446,0.00464484,0.007394215,0.19091865,0.0017847371,0.00037582053,0.0008049356,0.00023281969,0.76152754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5854602,0.0042708893,0.0114400415,0.2285716,0.002574827,0.00030793552,0.00034258075,0.00021813462,0.16681373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739774,0.002012005,0.00084111554,0.0023979428,0.013509381,0.007262132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750914,0.012649083,0.000542295,0.0010044454,0.008362216,0.0023506735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015220022,0.0010767689,0.00148496,0.0063539445,0.030047592,0.021230562,0.0077544255,0.035736535,0.011467467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029812176,0.0017110965,0.002862507,0.00358985,0.020688754,0.0057835877,0.0072268085,0.029699227,0.0014773175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034382378,0.000060518385,0.0020083948,0.000053766853,0.000031821863,0.0007044987,0.0027598487,0.00083281385,0.0006268618,0.8496245,0.12906225,0.014200253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024267884,0.000093772986,0.01582115,0.0010486075,0.00044315,0.00065190264,0.0056363773,0.005065358,0.0019800474,0.20327853,0.76513267,0.00060565566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.926509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97228235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07349098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05903683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12127979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4283442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003407905","doi":"","title":"The assertion of judicial jurisdiction over cyber-torts. A comparative analysis","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Derecho, Comunicaciones y Nuevas Tecnologías/Revista de derecho comunicaciones y nuevas tecnologias","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Tort; Law; Political science; Derecho; Civil procedure; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Arbitration; Humanities; Liability; Commercial law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043826348182436185,"score_gpt":0.29831537877115816,"score_spread":0.25448903058872197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003407905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42379144,0.0100989835,0.004133509,0.00726185,0.00018854585,0.00005007043,0.00014673888,0.000020830721,0.55430806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944916,0.00089877844,0.00021467866,0.00034807954,0.000035481706,0.000009569874,0.000023318364,0.0000046514397,0.0039739143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876736,0.0045572035,0.00044113415,0.0012330299,0.0041453904,0.0019496876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97641295,0.013522867,0.002839708,0.0009547011,0.0057871183,0.00048248848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009226585,0.00017451022,0.00042005314,0.0036120056,0.005030497,0.008237387,0.0014251636,0.0026711926,0.00869416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02733048,0.00018774497,0.00037728724,0.00282548,0.013552628,0.005302702,0.0034047088,0.0021110917,0.00035112412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006345034,0.000021056898,0.006373557,0.00015339168,0.000027593933,0.00077620044,0.02570499,0.00056694367,0.00043686765,0.9449027,0.0029374221,0.018035777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010736754,0.00022811358,0.15372317,0.002283628,0.00038833453,0.0024434489,0.18293166,0.0044723637,0.004756849,0.30191582,0.34655052,0.00019874384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06157127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07692939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06157127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012037413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005640676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122425795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005413826","doi":"","title":"A Study on Warrant Issuance Process in the U.S.A and Canadian Criminal Procedure -Focused on the Telewarrant through Advanced Technology-","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"korean Journal of Public Safety and Criminal Justice","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Process (computing); Business; Political science; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.038261084219824486,"score_gpt":0.27462318129046104,"score_spread":0.23636209707063655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005413826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931092,0.00016590765,0.00011036812,0.00026670692,0.000006625833,0.00006847197,0.00008926912,0.0000034900906,0.006179909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99546367,0.00031495423,0.00015567518,0.00012758377,0.000005715312,0.000016106758,0.00014394346,0.0000029261003,0.0037694438],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974784,0.00031804747,0.00013149597,0.00016673421,0.0011303821,0.00077489635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936388,0.0017842462,0.0011137021,0.00014024155,0.0026120036,0.0007109984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017495387,0.00023232482,0.00018238365,0.002141546,0.004480919,0.0022213536,0.0009223884,0.00093491276,0.0038541479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010165693,0.00019637542,0.0004199895,0.0032224,0.0013413599,0.0011990166,0.0007593163,0.0014140987,0.00039543622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003722987,0.0013398664,0.8637828,0.00018447723,0.00005289027,0.0016937078,0.05833484,0.0012693132,0.0019234046,0.013451124,0.0029595182,0.054635845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022218726,0.00026125225,0.9028104,0.00008052168,0.000060698578,0.00022569233,0.0830178,0.0015514884,0.00073765975,0.00056380883,0.010624256,0.000044174652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88322216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9364705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11677784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020677732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04466908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23493111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006649387","doi":"10.3968/11503","title":"The Protection of Privacy in the Disclosure of Judicial Documents","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Unification; Political science; Law; Democracy; Business; Internet privacy; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.0247110486159144,"score_gpt":0.24589726332386308,"score_spread":0.2211862147079487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006649387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06371803,0.01563576,0.0820755,0.13433166,0.0013347445,0.00032041018,0.0005230794,0.00013212723,0.70192873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9501758,0.005672303,0.014409286,0.00842676,0.0016365688,0.00020203482,0.00014381608,0.00004670071,0.019286819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9253036,0.040267244,0.0049711126,0.005078638,0.019244965,0.0051344037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91150975,0.050730005,0.0078749955,0.019439753,0.008989721,0.001455832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04095635,0.00036040274,0.0008836102,0.0021826625,0.007447971,0.015672363,0.0022470593,0.008638451,0.0036426936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09897268,0.0006915329,0.00092035835,0.003401791,0.021621274,0.011999201,0.007161239,0.007918667,0.0011726761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022187427,0.000014653699,0.0006611333,0.000055388566,0.000008908546,0.00016066007,0.0032111537,0.00023473077,0.00021867738,0.9750905,0.0031863146,0.01713571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044741882,0.000050792696,0.0019768474,0.00075085857,0.000058329933,0.000648064,0.0020573318,0.0013342506,0.0022083414,0.84052336,0.15027082,0.000076247845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010821297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052370923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005579158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015401568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21660048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007455390","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttz115","title":"Resolution of estate and trust disputes: mediation and Alternative Dispute Resolution in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Estate; Dispute resolution; Focus (optics); Perspective (graphical); Lawyer supported mediation; Dispute mechanism; Resolution (logic); Online dispute resolution; Real estate; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.015167481774974961,"score_gpt":0.20372296855858937,"score_spread":0.18855548678361442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007455390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16881439,0.048995852,0.01681738,0.07222469,0.0010026465,0.00051804533,0.00061277405,0.00011042693,0.6909038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94296795,0.01333892,0.0071479785,0.0015545413,0.00007521573,0.00007714628,0.0001423422,0.000028358154,0.034667682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878494,0.0027381454,0.00044871497,0.00062113116,0.004560302,0.0037823215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99287546,0.0020496715,0.00062779244,0.00028825633,0.0028916618,0.0012671866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005650301,0.00036790717,0.00047979958,0.0026631192,0.018669507,0.013327712,0.002487915,0.0026881848,0.010316696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0129314475,0.00039822998,0.00056428387,0.005437431,0.010908181,0.0026281031,0.004654529,0.0032339613,0.0003727761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013711673,0.00009356025,0.011486601,0.00057306373,0.00005158828,0.0019127947,0.030751703,0.005647905,0.00047884736,0.80558676,0.043489434,0.09979064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012766027,0.0000587111,0.04220793,0.0017512167,0.00010789358,0.0010764719,0.07374493,0.008690226,0.0010924628,0.07599529,0.79484093,0.0003062361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9909127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99546766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13814862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13814862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18846983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007625440","doi":"","title":"Význam rodinné mediace při řešení právních konfliktů v rodině","year":2011,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012557065118225564,"score_gpt":0.22987551788941907,"score_spread":0.2173184527711935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007625440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08402019,0.06818944,0.011896893,0.03943926,0.0033074026,0.000100719975,0.00033762248,0.00027625222,0.79243225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76619583,0.023780754,0.004402473,0.0022959886,0.0009716925,0.00009601507,0.00016483763,0.00024914628,0.20184322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913436,0.00038395592,0.00004082887,0.0001408289,0.00020315211,0.00009687321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992737,0.00027547864,0.00009203509,0.00008951451,0.00012682131,0.00014230958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011316744,0.0002542262,0.0004276714,0.0010272523,0.0031162377,0.006393786,0.00045255653,0.00088487315,0.014971658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021702605,0.00017841501,0.0002287011,0.0009797273,0.0033462911,0.003032528,0.0026077838,0.0033173882,0.002834269],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092673705,0.00008897159,0.001609003,0.0005449095,0.000023594333,0.00067756546,0.018588059,0.00076163444,0.0010715051,0.82263005,0.050983515,0.10292855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014232261,0.00007019321,0.0039855135,0.00077725673,0.000020051573,0.00068583083,0.006389416,0.0004112335,0.0010519342,0.04691472,0.9396538,0.000025935007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025121623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030000883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014971658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025289454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025092391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050085127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024201204","doi":"10.1017/s0008423920000505","title":"Trial by Zoom? The Response to COVID-19 by Canada's Courts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science; Jurisdiction; Law; Legislature; Economic Justice; Openness to experience; Democracy; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.025173038375297496,"score_gpt":0.2636502158871446,"score_spread":0.2384771775118471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024201204","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060477667,0.70236665,0.0009160686,0.17865305,0.002235705,0.00032488097,0.0034794675,0.000052753177,0.051493805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5471371,0.3326989,0.0023679386,0.110228896,0.0007471294,0.0002774907,0.0016402765,0.00007189916,0.004830383],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9533122,0.011693287,0.004117589,0.0022420255,0.02541596,0.0032190166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.871274,0.06188776,0.01556994,0.0026441382,0.04507601,0.0035480738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030352052,0.00026527303,0.0009906093,0.0065687043,0.0068493187,0.00835654,0.0025043802,0.0027552252,0.001689442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12172611,0.00044507012,0.0005998931,0.017507924,0.008683827,0.0029261573,0.0020961072,0.003762324,0.00017991423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031549865,0.000043324508,0.039906036,0.036453463,0.0008478624,0.0012032359,0.0468797,0.00063182315,0.0009427969,0.07926778,0.41123563,0.38227278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009149749,0.000057814595,0.07009632,0.07531077,0.0008501937,0.0004071563,0.042850606,0.00019704083,0.0007149749,0.0049444567,0.8043055,0.00017366353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9485802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9791574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9166617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08333834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23696986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6046648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3030375759","doi":"","title":"Designing Online Dispute Resolution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Online dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02966217512322199,"score_gpt":0.24502406462408108,"score_spread":0.21536188950085908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3030375759","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014106089,0.0015976717,0.8111033,0.015786538,0.0018889429,0.0030067514,0.00034691906,0.0021208688,0.15004292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13551435,0.0013207573,0.80875427,0.003163779,0.0005054241,0.003718816,0.001052051,0.0011477204,0.04482284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9380419,0.045653943,0.0035685804,0.0044956044,0.0062992284,0.0019406792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9032725,0.06992724,0.0041134693,0.012865641,0.0063157575,0.0035054332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048144154,0.0014919889,0.00097616896,0.0034789215,0.009583642,0.018444974,0.0068460433,0.006198454,0.053495053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12489789,0.0014461178,0.0015018178,0.002532389,0.0073689227,0.028844262,0.016920552,0.005205196,0.015258348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001302328,0.00056252925,0.0028925203,0.001361554,0.000052938678,0.0010370354,0.060668144,0.0042437348,0.002391356,0.5604552,0.062502526,0.30370215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008186881,0.00013020527,0.0003062815,0.00066794944,0.000030955172,0.0005973439,0.02184812,0.008735785,0.002663776,0.13321225,0.83165854,0.00006696706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007269439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010002389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053495053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039171632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005740857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25461364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W303070228","doi":"","title":"Global Strategies and Techniques for Defending Class Action Trials: Defending the Global Company in Multinational Litigation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Redress; Damages; Mass tort; Law; Compromise; Legislation; Plaintiff; Multinational corporation; Political science; Jurisdiction; Liability; Tort; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.05994085514934693,"score_gpt":0.34135989735633665,"score_spread":0.2814190422069897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W303070228","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03040642,0.01430115,0.43284258,0.09547909,0.0012789627,0.00090884854,0.00009577759,0.0006636209,0.42402348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6725685,0.007808793,0.2219114,0.026838921,0.0014711359,0.0015822144,0.00013779888,0.000578444,0.06710276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9695795,0.020447016,0.001021441,0.0029158453,0.0041875523,0.0018486473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586219,0.02735216,0.0026277096,0.0067130174,0.003190797,0.0014943617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06106307,0.0012813018,0.0011616976,0.0059418157,0.006791987,0.022190616,0.0035029345,0.010992893,0.009642933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057730734,0.0009217906,0.0016757519,0.0037870312,0.031070966,0.0147229675,0.013965668,0.011410897,0.0025016943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003058344,0.00002666037,0.001451843,0.00012487966,0.000035422843,0.00021544988,0.005579688,0.0012223166,0.0003955578,0.9346832,0.009243669,0.046990793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009769694,0.00016893641,0.0015856652,0.0014691476,0.00012927469,0.000594532,0.005730346,0.0049579004,0.0012394845,0.7572192,0.22671734,0.00009053042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066503426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011277127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06106307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066703153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010218661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32293624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034816969","doi":"","title":"ACPNS Legal Case Notes Series: 2020-62 Hasson v Habitat for Humanity - Edmonton Society","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanity; Series (stratigraphy); Geography; Law; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.01781344874304642,"score_gpt":0.20765066907200333,"score_spread":0.18983722032895692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034816969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070198504,0.0014167774,0.00041748982,0.02704365,0.0020758891,0.00020414488,0.001982978,0.0001306263,0.9597086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036053903,0.00048115896,0.00028247113,0.025754549,0.0003692049,0.00014399446,0.0008611605,0.000049609156,0.9360041],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974584,0.00019149015,0.00006168713,0.0002196901,0.0011914457,0.0008772766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983785,0.0004612498,0.0000485852,0.00007980707,0.0007080038,0.0003238833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019175446,0.0007029186,0.00028488412,0.0015751895,0.010666949,0.0043296004,0.0021736957,0.014893961,0.082344934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049110185,0.0008055212,0.0006407846,0.0011462338,0.0018511888,0.0017562013,0.002180522,0.0073813847,0.0155606875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042360803,0.00007579486,0.00085983827,0.000041289437,0.0000054156703,0.0007601997,0.0006178052,0.0001205722,0.00031271274,0.070500985,0.91920036,0.0074625905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000518819,0.00003589606,0.004861614,0.00020637657,0.00001652831,0.00028332052,0.0010402176,0.00030246275,0.0005948936,0.005974159,0.9865937,0.00003892098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55351776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7564101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44648224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010762472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021440502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89822334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035464921","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198837138.013.37","title":"The Equustek Effect: A Canadian Perspective on Global Takedown Orders in the Age of the Internet","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Jurisdiction; Political science; Order (exchange); Law; Supreme court; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.017064735269005912,"score_gpt":0.24663585712108857,"score_spread":0.22957112185208267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035464921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009414878,0.004715389,0.0015385818,0.025268504,0.00034278678,0.000041111296,0.00019717298,0.000053953157,0.9584277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68847686,0.015826017,0.004557724,0.028308047,0.00058080896,0.00009728152,0.0003336991,0.00025935404,0.26156014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98728055,0.0011927078,0.00020483219,0.0010506563,0.0061091855,0.0041620797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993996,0.0019302458,0.00031195502,0.00037653834,0.0026885858,0.00069657643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043898476,0.0010015187,0.0006734334,0.00675762,0.026240554,0.025583858,0.0031710153,0.0074340417,0.020637926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011959148,0.0006518056,0.0008556797,0.008178068,0.025709832,0.009939961,0.0057826256,0.010485504,0.0013405303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059741496,0.0000054521565,0.00031726205,0.000018677332,0.0000026332689,0.00019297903,0.0026047125,0.00018618246,0.00003695457,0.97964305,0.012586214,0.0043998333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001893211,0.000022561393,0.0045756814,0.00043770706,0.000036787726,0.00041936943,0.017479757,0.0012493783,0.00040993578,0.15154031,0.8236216,0.00018803001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98339427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15073603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15073603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13085708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9850258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035886097","doi":"10.18272/iu.v25i25.1634","title":"American Legal Realism in Dispute Resolution. Alternative Dispute Resolution as a “Realist” Project","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Iuris Dictio","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stanford Bio-X; University of Oxford; Connaught Fund; Yale University; University of Cambridge; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Realism; Economic Justice; Legal realism; Pragmatism; Normative; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Political science; Phenomenon; Epistemology; Legal research; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029857059928471808,"score_gpt":0.2726161531493165,"score_spread":0.24275909322084466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035886097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014870827,0.029347718,0.026134951,0.1897841,0.0018568845,0.000043384727,0.000040618546,0.00003906631,0.7378824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90995,0.011425591,0.008679933,0.020097677,0.0024483192,0.00019539603,0.00004241817,0.00006226921,0.047098383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889811,0.0075692227,0.00019426472,0.00063091895,0.0020663769,0.0005581471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99460274,0.00362589,0.00046049818,0.00050728477,0.00046254217,0.00034102192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007960123,0.00037584844,0.00033137467,0.0015139565,0.007813493,0.01016852,0.0012283155,0.006652066,0.0051140203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084734205,0.00034741632,0.0005391892,0.0018869854,0.046813477,0.009219235,0.0048158234,0.010270706,0.0008095252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010401665,0.0000035210262,0.0000132073565,0.000005126352,2.834451e-7,0.000006433916,0.00040477864,0.00003811109,0.000006688581,0.9980192,0.0008459014,0.0006556558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061748565,0.0000044372705,0.00005156022,0.000039212344,0.0000014332749,0.000023101462,0.00047935668,0.00030106705,0.000029001105,0.94468564,0.054374795,0.0000043684977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006389392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063570435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01016852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009453947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053548017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06859356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036615066","doi":"","title":"Online Dispute Resolution: A Canada-United States Initiative","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.014532655974931374,"score_gpt":0.21389293704083256,"score_spread":0.1993602810659012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036615066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20884508,0.011059733,0.007367341,0.34037885,0.003227885,0.0012996392,0.0025108461,0.0006025243,0.42470807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7918895,0.007220911,0.01368608,0.04125439,0.00059665734,0.0005217715,0.0022572342,0.00021867914,0.14235486],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98372537,0.002999297,0.0003426564,0.000926116,0.0080469,0.003959684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9377609,0.013472265,0.0014952775,0.0018379936,0.020873867,0.024559697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0212046,0.00047363646,0.0005146472,0.0045067174,0.029376172,0.01712058,0.003691741,0.0073021557,0.017651828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026897248,0.00058700563,0.0006693001,0.008552272,0.0075666136,0.006340264,0.009043514,0.0056940485,0.0011744597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000606395,0.0027421762,0.024583194,0.0002533809,0.00007974215,0.00090064394,0.0121474685,0.0010998395,0.0013722916,0.19755158,0.4482367,0.31042665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006587315,0.00024196543,0.053093713,0.0002974288,0.000084094776,0.0003082805,0.035051376,0.00377887,0.0014976126,0.0098607475,0.89500177,0.00012544649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9728238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9870755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9076552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.092344806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31573102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67001164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047320569","doi":"","title":"Nota sobre Jurisprudência Canadense Histórica em defesa do consumidor sobre matéria bancária","year":2018,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Direito do Consumidor","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economy; Welfare economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01802794365747756,"score_gpt":0.25457472749546933,"score_spread":0.23654678383799177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047320569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046630364,0.009681306,0.00502507,0.04088132,0.0006692226,0.000078133635,0.00017234204,0.000055307908,0.8968069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89675707,0.0048848586,0.001977885,0.009875857,0.00029167777,0.000055933913,0.00006973035,0.000051920306,0.08603515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99143195,0.0010355928,0.00015740984,0.0009440962,0.0042670323,0.0021638994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99326575,0.0034763708,0.00039555502,0.0004843267,0.0020983822,0.0002795646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069030933,0.00046023197,0.0005920003,0.0024802631,0.01874585,0.016113393,0.002387325,0.005513299,0.006376231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013443773,0.0004492897,0.00045569302,0.0027956779,0.032636818,0.0046191714,0.0032137414,0.009283586,0.00047733236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000626083,0.0000040250616,0.0003177261,0.00002754471,0.0000033230313,0.0001206905,0.0047706896,0.00009023496,0.0001170999,0.98705125,0.0040949234,0.0033961383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016943446,0.00002062254,0.0037350506,0.00054937956,0.000046166337,0.0002826607,0.01941708,0.00044365207,0.0016013813,0.17413206,0.79968846,0.00006661756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80448747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8774119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19551253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.066410504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060661457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4818442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047802480","doi":"10.1002/iir.1390","title":"The performance of the courts in the digital era: The case of insolvency and restructuring proceedings","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Bankruptcy; Economic Justice; Insolvency; Function (biology); Business; Politics; Public relations; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.020515845927218602,"score_gpt":0.24744175428630158,"score_spread":0.22692590835908297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047802480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6341824,0.0026500465,0.0018785917,0.07001305,0.00024439752,0.00007802316,0.000038438255,0.000018333292,0.2908968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99090815,0.0003989012,0.00019563346,0.0023140472,0.00009980875,0.000017144694,0.000006843273,0.000007672614,0.006051745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97288436,0.017251184,0.0007295358,0.0012252441,0.0036130748,0.004296713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9320282,0.05549401,0.0044546165,0.0015728273,0.003660548,0.0027898925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020998318,0.00018242504,0.0004120835,0.0031197828,0.019704325,0.022705704,0.0019288467,0.009439963,0.006646192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051528297,0.00031745312,0.00025802216,0.0037201974,0.02505256,0.008414799,0.00835199,0.0074494374,0.0005757262],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000857595,0.00018788705,0.010546039,0.000109606925,0.000019907464,0.012039358,0.29001626,0.00064831355,0.00073750626,0.64737767,0.01439834,0.023833293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054272812,0.00016769083,0.02119273,0.00067555846,0.0000543602,0.002988266,0.672853,0.0021893764,0.001633217,0.06572954,0.23231208,0.00014989007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023569541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036035363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023569541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011885844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006683693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11105102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047819823","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3602294","title":"Cy Près Settlements in Privacy Class Actions","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Human settlement; Class (philosophy); Internet privacy; Business; Computer security; Computer science; Geography; Artificial intelligence; Archaeology","score_opus":0.028222248741514192,"score_gpt":0.2613289433194855,"score_spread":0.23310669457797129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047819823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11061187,0.0010248821,0.021824762,0.02075137,0.0007451097,0.00028622444,0.00018927106,0.00009170881,0.8444747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93301433,0.00021262853,0.001376297,0.0011031249,0.00021634511,0.00012388645,0.000051771476,0.00002737618,0.063874096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797632,0.007882549,0.0012345735,0.0023795883,0.0033309544,0.005409153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9660433,0.022336064,0.0031043517,0.0040844693,0.0025760205,0.0018556892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017776584,0.00037566596,0.0008642363,0.0022250323,0.011407638,0.014277559,0.001998635,0.011163468,0.042893894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07057167,0.0007271899,0.000891173,0.0016189773,0.009507624,0.01341169,0.009717815,0.011691951,0.0030936145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004480882,0.000039502636,0.0007015368,0.000012388588,0.0000049133255,0.000084881984,0.0014269225,0.00018076132,0.000051939645,0.9888719,0.003056177,0.0055243275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007480174,0.000059043567,0.0023085382,0.00012095154,0.000026340269,0.00021900116,0.0060463315,0.0022997146,0.0006620535,0.92408806,0.06406138,0.000033796554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00749011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006455221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042893894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005960391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006764354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14349437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049681128","doi":"10.38124/ijisrt20jul858","title":"Are Browse-wrap Agreements Legally Binding: As Analysed Across Multiple Jurisdictions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Enforcement; Business; Abandonment (legal); Element (criminal law); European union; Ambiguity; International trade; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09432533011570833,"score_gpt":0.41255917008175663,"score_spread":0.3182338399660483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049681128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4484293,0.0014292272,0.06986477,0.01309506,0.0002448853,0.00070063426,0.0010280258,0.00030563818,0.46490246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730198,0.0004180352,0.01273937,0.001591492,0.000049782357,0.00031690358,0.0004168085,0.000106952575,0.011340867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93947625,0.019033918,0.0041438704,0.0053621395,0.02332704,0.008656745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89742476,0.045304876,0.015500769,0.019844493,0.01956122,0.002363886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035247765,0.00024564125,0.0010429954,0.004760646,0.00868294,0.02082962,0.0028169467,0.006813705,0.0136156855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13805339,0.0008750328,0.0008041108,0.007618203,0.016513774,0.026309863,0.013121019,0.0048388955,0.001939447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057452824,0.00005951499,0.014851793,0.00013450363,0.00003560808,0.00083466433,0.033963326,0.00041097196,0.0008657742,0.9181796,0.0037010058,0.026905794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065902976,0.00009766495,0.043844927,0.001867723,0.00015756815,0.001648975,0.1326293,0.005058072,0.0036034004,0.6040981,0.20672543,0.00020297221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028897488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019080548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035247765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005885015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017134635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18641019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W307601363","doi":"","title":"Judicial supervision of individual settlements with class members in Australia, Canada, and the United States","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Settlement (finance); Human settlement; Law; Political science; Negotiation; Civil procedure; State (computer science); Geography; Business","score_opus":0.018597823018660073,"score_gpt":0.2494729458172701,"score_spread":0.23087512279861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W307601363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52417964,0.0073685166,0.002094212,0.027912566,0.0006679007,0.0006680332,0.0006461162,0.00030157907,0.43616146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88313055,0.0024706547,0.0018336673,0.00461292,0.00016570558,0.00016537942,0.0004405248,0.000046303554,0.10713422],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988713,0.0010493173,0.0005949268,0.0006537542,0.006096258,0.0028926905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981139,0.0033759086,0.0015310505,0.00065110304,0.010263534,0.0030394583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005950914,0.00022509569,0.00032322377,0.0022586691,0.014367681,0.004528075,0.0019674797,0.0030209725,0.00492964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019291904,0.00053044077,0.00032284253,0.0019097915,0.004093727,0.0006522127,0.0025827645,0.0042408924,0.0006417784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023966757,0.0005138094,0.07155882,0.0005230729,0.00010002414,0.0038560242,0.0650759,0.006665738,0.004378178,0.26657838,0.32848793,0.2520225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001310528,0.00015082906,0.26350477,0.00081237504,0.00011266342,0.00064845505,0.020767821,0.0051982705,0.002951641,0.012151977,0.6932711,0.00029908304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8892086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9414442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110791385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03278662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10387592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2378847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088370415","doi":"10.1177/1023263x20949685","title":"Class action certification and constitutional claims: The South African case","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Class action; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Business; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; History; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1395839156609319,"score_gpt":0.27318722575248466,"score_spread":0.13360331009155277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088370415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3376393,0.00412442,0.0066750366,0.039960444,0.0003518431,0.00019944354,0.000047403544,0.00002195749,0.61098015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810322,0.0008439175,0.0007435722,0.0027844154,0.00006089078,0.00006800356,0.0000071820496,0.0000058109563,0.014453955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907506,0.0032336889,0.00037134104,0.0006485914,0.0016257404,0.0033700934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929865,0.004770743,0.0007694256,0.00047539367,0.00048955425,0.0005082865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010156883,0.0003640519,0.00056127406,0.0017194214,0.02127586,0.0090722535,0.0013696705,0.011021827,0.0052172295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014127799,0.00059902295,0.00085586886,0.0019059079,0.025821796,0.0057177767,0.009978317,0.01013132,0.00041583672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011223076,0.000015150597,0.0007144685,0.00002243713,0.000003071415,0.0010962918,0.0055605303,0.00018658822,0.00017020514,0.9902165,0.00051123515,0.001492412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023634075,0.00020753901,0.011175644,0.0018600085,0.00014352301,0.00423788,0.05720969,0.004212267,0.0046776393,0.5636777,0.35208127,0.0002804703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08311531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10468986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08311531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012354844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015060649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16526306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092761120","doi":"10.16960/jhlr.21.2.202006.127","title":"A Study on the Recent Advanced Legal System & Litgation Related to Grenhouse Gas Emision Rights -Focused on Canadian Legislation and EU-ETS’s Major Cases-","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of hongik law review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.03260700983479384,"score_gpt":0.26483628560265016,"score_spread":0.23222927576785632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092761120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6901863,0.0050430107,0.00051712844,0.011932168,0.00014597925,0.00010574435,0.0004874454,0.000016265103,0.291566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95677453,0.0024774948,0.00017167217,0.0023483243,0.000051377585,0.00001310579,0.00017831684,0.000008108828,0.03797705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978896,0.00016740245,0.000054291464,0.00016267996,0.00084942905,0.00087663485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617887,0.0015922382,0.0004942914,0.00012295769,0.0013163812,0.0002952602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023133326,0.00012747261,0.00016770438,0.0033543843,0.006692185,0.0052138795,0.0013067705,0.0021865312,0.006141185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057772524,0.00018698818,0.00034505923,0.0052057886,0.0057128933,0.0021233885,0.001366274,0.0029680748,0.00025431273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014310252,0.00022178826,0.07300222,0.0003542561,0.00004961561,0.0030076636,0.054383323,0.0011170916,0.0020850413,0.7660078,0.029800976,0.0698271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002165014,0.00008193572,0.44791934,0.00035297513,0.000076993216,0.00063231535,0.07482858,0.00079752074,0.002247393,0.011505119,0.46145588,0.00008026937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8551429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94404835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14485711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03138811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03070362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29142034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3104562674","doi":"","title":"Being Innovative in Exploring Litigation Alternatives","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Project commissioning; Legislature; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Oppression; Pandemic; Business; Engineering; Political science; Publishing; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.035402859913827064,"score_gpt":0.24278435132517287,"score_spread":0.20738149141134582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3104562674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04464046,0.0024711273,0.042494465,0.062250115,0.0004626802,0.00015627145,0.000051514722,0.000057320653,0.84741604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94434756,0.0024908385,0.01897744,0.007408254,0.0003093456,0.0002671007,0.000056927514,0.00005465338,0.026087949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855198,0.008474736,0.00033477816,0.0013084603,0.0023158453,0.0020462666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831079,0.011001704,0.0014242029,0.0015636693,0.0014810413,0.0014215134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018364746,0.000650676,0.0006586692,0.0027689806,0.0075921216,0.024626736,0.0030025083,0.009390048,0.020489177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023780337,0.0003730404,0.0011633161,0.0023832368,0.027883999,0.022366393,0.010695524,0.007194102,0.0020122842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010631384,0.00003290776,0.00030178067,0.000031720385,0.000006404972,0.00012753993,0.0022614056,0.0005151114,0.0000874601,0.9886646,0.0012104079,0.006749936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024333402,0.00004625527,0.00025286296,0.00016187812,0.000011945727,0.00021193319,0.011847144,0.001699336,0.0001993607,0.9106681,0.07485967,0.000017199109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014192646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033927925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024626736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055937166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007663622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097123206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107899937","doi":"10.29173/mlj1272","title":"Triaging and Mediating to Meet the Needs of Families Under The Family Dispute Resolution (Pilot Project) Act of Manitoba","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Commit; Dispute resolution; Mandate; Resolution (logic); Alternative dispute resolution; Set (abstract data type); Family mediation; Government (linguistics); Process (computing); Dispute mechanism; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03668561358687203,"score_gpt":0.24478650386286904,"score_spread":0.208100890275997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107899937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70023125,0.005140379,0.016274305,0.15479468,0.0009318437,0.005666882,0.0004645755,0.00021295065,0.11628313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89954954,0.0039876094,0.026048832,0.018629638,0.00008951814,0.0030503697,0.00017196032,0.00003801583,0.048434433],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99150676,0.0048415675,0.00026848735,0.00032526127,0.00078756403,0.0022704047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886692,0.003322509,0.00071997097,0.0007668716,0.0026221815,0.0038991403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017041754,0.0003490931,0.00028375562,0.00086563535,0.018153738,0.0041767284,0.0027556848,0.0019570217,0.0051808483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017197449,0.00073140266,0.00031776194,0.0010369408,0.005798349,0.0017822989,0.00658467,0.0029185545,0.00055180636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023335138,0.00084464066,0.09753099,0.000995745,0.00006511779,0.011654891,0.532829,0.0014871965,0.011842536,0.11806172,0.07714698,0.14730778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013689585,0.0005268856,0.11777437,0.0016562922,0.00008823063,0.001908589,0.4344246,0.0013215519,0.0027791506,0.008037752,0.43117073,0.00017488976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66508615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90838003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33491385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021184037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13370502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67377245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108721619","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v14n1p43","title":"The Application of the Third Party&amp;#39;s Right Relief System in Civil Procedure Law of the People&amp;#39;s Republic of China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Law; Civil procedure; Revocation; Political science; Order (exchange); China; Position (finance); Enforcement; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.011778622207410822,"score_gpt":0.22781991926014974,"score_spread":0.21604129705273892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108721619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48677295,0.0037570135,0.03725264,0.018806161,0.0006933788,0.0010805827,0.00037871895,0.00022950955,0.451029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9382659,0.0006122978,0.0053271726,0.0016895871,0.00011101917,0.00021150638,0.000055063192,0.000015567692,0.053711794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958704,0.00063034974,0.00035487823,0.00065114704,0.0011987694,0.0012944629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986357,0.00032407301,0.0002131656,0.00016875078,0.00045403172,0.00020424822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004810974,0.00021625272,0.00020882853,0.0011734762,0.00394781,0.0040028933,0.00091595366,0.0021932682,0.0020978195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037059959,0.00039980363,0.0004302061,0.0011266228,0.0051398184,0.00207299,0.0022200285,0.0030371537,0.00036672535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003622148,0.000043610937,0.006668723,0.00006612802,0.000008744766,0.0007083349,0.0056368057,0.0009248161,0.0016980409,0.94610095,0.008094926,0.030012675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026522737,0.0005249449,0.1266802,0.0006256669,0.00019215673,0.0015129844,0.0065688654,0.031956177,0.010478249,0.2573417,0.5634022,0.00045161982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09413006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09433923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09413006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012872936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03221397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18716437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109734141","doi":"","title":"The Ontario Government introduces Bill 161 with amendments to process for class actions and private enforcement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Class (philosophy); Enforcement; Government (linguistics); Business; Law and economics; Public administration; Computer science; Process management; Law; Political science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.012264482282624601,"score_gpt":0.22247297303977331,"score_spread":0.2102084907571487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109734141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010071486,0.000622116,0.002290852,0.034129467,0.0032261303,0.0015096738,0.00421993,0.0010119722,0.94291836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017499775,0.00025732178,0.0017259802,0.014270898,0.00048281622,0.0003430651,0.00076736935,0.00019635036,0.9644564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97369236,0.0013024173,0.001155863,0.00096855767,0.017450374,0.0054305317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827297,0.0039915205,0.0006541893,0.0014667483,0.009266148,0.0018917865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008368523,0.0009222518,0.0010503693,0.0038572757,0.018239692,0.010873011,0.0038673608,0.021236101,0.056606594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024795223,0.0022411048,0.0020935487,0.0034440414,0.0056775855,0.00238897,0.0028680586,0.010175986,0.017411793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008667356,0.000173788,0.0020599768,0.0001357665,0.000016245258,0.00028099888,0.001720106,0.00022064417,0.000739989,0.16362995,0.8154406,0.015495299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060572867,0.000038348953,0.0087938905,0.00007255724,0.000027546084,0.000039063012,0.00053649524,0.00017996306,0.00034627953,0.003223547,0.9866196,0.00006226822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93090403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9749737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06909597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061722323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15283327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4478289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111068757","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Supreme Court clarifies several procedural questions relating to class actions, with potential significance to class actions in the UK and EU (Pioneer / Godfrey)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Res judicata; Class action; Epistemology; Philosophy; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.010739267220622248,"score_gpt":0.2151343034631421,"score_spread":0.20439503624251987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111068757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039775856,0.004949265,0.0049566478,0.29385158,0.004711292,0.00031871736,0.001701588,0.0002458614,0.6494891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34617868,0.0032527628,0.008377703,0.23689832,0.0012146194,0.00030753706,0.00050651125,0.00026096147,0.40300292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760478,0.0020447972,0.00091547676,0.0017044689,0.01081398,0.008473465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98242664,0.0078956,0.00055420696,0.00078886445,0.0066331816,0.0017015821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01087713,0.00086650805,0.0011504496,0.0039512464,0.040798906,0.021947753,0.0072525195,0.032603487,0.014388982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031102212,0.0012362135,0.0020348208,0.005830564,0.017930446,0.0044001443,0.005670228,0.030467257,0.0018550361],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002085933,0.000037707196,0.0010255809,0.00004549805,0.000019122203,0.00030418258,0.0047462014,0.00022625527,0.0003139249,0.80279636,0.18255308,0.0079112565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121966004,0.00003988901,0.013047629,0.0004897835,0.00016766839,0.00027267542,0.011099647,0.0009866494,0.0015845387,0.063100465,0.90861696,0.00047217714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9844639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99339175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082384095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082384095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16898692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59774125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115381380","doi":"","title":"The Emergence and Reform of the New Zealand Class Action: The Second Empirical Study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Plaintiff; Civil procedure; Class (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Action (physics); Law; Opt-out; Business; Economics; Computer science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.0272939414246185,"score_gpt":0.2787477875590845,"score_spread":0.25145384613446603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115381380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9076816,0.0014971254,0.0006673769,0.00415468,0.000061734485,0.0004424561,0.00046011782,0.0000112426205,0.08502365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882883,0.0007247042,0.00047609553,0.00048413608,0.000046070512,0.00020339267,0.00027790436,0.000022394872,0.009477062],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157315,0.0012381283,0.0006410706,0.0009943646,0.004030264,0.0015229557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631587,0.009557334,0.014676998,0.0029735593,0.006882357,0.0027510135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008598126,0.00032492925,0.00091656955,0.0052687833,0.0045364117,0.007761785,0.0024254092,0.0015007992,0.014786567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041476622,0.000409352,0.000622337,0.005675376,0.010262251,0.008105847,0.006386653,0.00402746,0.00094197993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036267846,0.00088854413,0.44992423,0.0013404709,0.00012251674,0.002077275,0.32991365,0.00034778402,0.001199299,0.12046214,0.016062966,0.077298395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002936911,0.000118486256,0.7034254,0.0008769318,0.00007625472,0.00030149723,0.21852952,0.0008592478,0.00021958856,0.0032697266,0.07223754,0.00005655125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3609072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4024086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3609072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020294016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01658746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.717613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115395913","doi":"","title":"A Study on the Way of Improving Korea's Parole System by the Analysis of Canada's Corrections and Conditional Release Act","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Korean Journal of Correctional Discourse","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.014807907612286033,"score_gpt":0.24758384887673177,"score_spread":0.23277594126444573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115395913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92530733,0.00050230295,0.0032738838,0.0035895305,0.0000706278,0.00015160635,0.0002827635,0.000073432886,0.0667485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923827,0.00015006882,0.0015597314,0.0001869324,0.0000069935354,0.000016848755,0.00010319263,0.000039890452,0.0055536563],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956181,0.0020586986,0.00018976138,0.00038403383,0.0010209926,0.0007284892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810275,0.009505573,0.0011129273,0.0009860074,0.0068289847,0.000539005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040676007,0.00020649984,0.00020440028,0.0020806766,0.01008435,0.0054708906,0.0012190192,0.0009946333,0.0033483638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022112196,0.00023342475,0.0001777965,0.003319874,0.0040478334,0.003116737,0.001290378,0.0021172704,0.00032921074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016263324,0.00012204108,0.0611404,0.00026112737,0.000022289585,0.0017098447,0.7180149,0.00050989195,0.0046812026,0.095591,0.014897802,0.102886885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000118509415,0.0000469051,0.1079812,0.0002739377,0.0000846128,0.00047673588,0.74912417,0.0034384385,0.0039272015,0.0046319156,0.12990262,0.00010036755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60793114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7868567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39206886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017138949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02908114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78875566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120148104","doi":"","title":"Single Family For Sale - Pender Harbour, British Columbia, Canada v0N 2H1 - Price $1,688,000","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harbour; Geography; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.01378495193856776,"score_gpt":0.1888463081540677,"score_spread":0.17506135621549992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120148104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027913174,0.000354341,0.00015642378,0.0011406312,0.00048172497,0.0001330992,0.005676159,0.000479331,0.9887869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021375436,0.000087949775,0.0000409547,0.00016136348,0.00000968723,0.0000103006405,0.00080955087,0.00006297661,0.99667966],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945956,0.000019454965,0.000011761138,0.000059074093,0.00023849856,0.00021162692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871004,0.00006214569,0.000019001325,0.00005621532,0.0006343877,0.0005181325],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030117144,0.0007390657,0.0005743171,0.0010817451,0.006386456,0.002856424,0.001362291,0.0024083883,0.78629184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012844561,0.0006726073,0.0005423245,0.0012700157,0.0007330093,0.000843244,0.0013730897,0.0020631861,0.4638516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060830527,0.000033540284,0.0008221968,0.00003777442,0.0000036906224,0.00008368155,0.00004498509,0.000077528784,0.0002820202,0.0010470685,0.9768767,0.020630077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033684195,0.000026736834,0.009939426,0.00008994855,0.000007084184,0.000056051067,0.00038826885,0.00016367147,0.00017613173,0.0002350723,0.98886555,0.000018238728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8649016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97272724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21370816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007357442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017954318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3048287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121612408","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2012.0017","title":"Justice for Profit: A Comparative Analysis of Australian, Canadian and U.S. Third Party Litigation Funding","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Class action; Economic Justice; Political science; Context (archaeology); Civil procedure; Law; Civil litigation; Public administration; Business; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.11209026076870873,"score_gpt":0.3554160378716755,"score_spread":0.2433257771029668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121612408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6396422,0.007529588,0.00042033568,0.019396521,0.0001577198,0.00012470833,0.00071342697,0.00003821532,0.3319773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98100084,0.0036379057,0.00031203113,0.0020003177,0.00004767743,0.000049129125,0.00027369772,0.000018467294,0.012659831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.985823,0.0015078938,0.00025828741,0.0004162777,0.0062676696,0.0057269232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97564566,0.0064762644,0.002487068,0.000573399,0.011193813,0.0036238134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049831797,0.00023513044,0.0006218342,0.012892176,0.01872314,0.009779372,0.002129129,0.002664173,0.0055909194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031587165,0.00032676553,0.00054759544,0.022539742,0.005677995,0.003286961,0.004151045,0.0028299745,0.00032242358],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025650737,0.0002901233,0.14387761,0.0006685546,0.00014006425,0.0027516868,0.22544742,0.0010989886,0.0007321163,0.45569804,0.053041134,0.11599782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025570991,0.00011907884,0.5906885,0.0008611675,0.00015897019,0.00071379845,0.16564447,0.0017389278,0.00041331898,0.007396573,0.2320735,0.0001661316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9745222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98908347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11895827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11895827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13123587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8631067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121641312","doi":"","title":"Administrative and Judicial Enforcement in Consumer Protection: The Way Forward","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Enforcement; Directive; Commission; European commission; Member state; Political science; Business; Ex-ante; Intervention (counseling); Law and economics; European union; Public administration; Law; Economics; Member states; International trade; Computer science","score_opus":0.0667493287423278,"score_gpt":0.3168314278449908,"score_spread":0.250082099102663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121641312","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04884444,0.13880618,0.02389445,0.5360077,0.002339269,0.00006321413,0.00007290697,0.000042042037,0.2499298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8773789,0.055022113,0.0047542932,0.030453444,0.008730742,0.0001085028,0.000051397637,0.000055473276,0.023445224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9802207,0.010219687,0.0006561256,0.0017129015,0.0044719903,0.0027186095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90632784,0.07559411,0.007294764,0.0031567807,0.0060031908,0.001623387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017955612,0.0005275714,0.0019435929,0.003008216,0.004333522,0.020987332,0.0029349185,0.021811526,0.013259794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04169863,0.00067617046,0.0015501389,0.00670756,0.04147297,0.032125104,0.005786473,0.015499172,0.00083678646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002013029,0.000025897867,0.0004195973,0.000052122854,0.000009934036,0.000043228756,0.00046022743,0.00034757485,0.000015520453,0.9928323,0.0015867107,0.004186772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043067135,0.000046781173,0.0032903417,0.00062849006,0.00003193605,0.00011618149,0.004361443,0.0021555314,0.0001437722,0.94907737,0.040047284,0.00005792244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023706285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016838558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023706285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012353332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011270414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0949595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122267361","doi":"","title":"Fessing up to Facebook: recent trends in the use of social network websites for civil litigation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Business; Advertising; Social media; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04529120209842322,"score_gpt":0.2801356768294126,"score_spread":0.23484447473098938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122267361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5637658,0.09726709,0.0039913985,0.10733975,0.0012921751,0.00016607172,0.0026760248,0.00045566968,0.22304595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.916645,0.051028546,0.0030901926,0.009838451,0.0014656907,0.00007146104,0.0010338941,0.000114575254,0.01671225],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960323,0.00095684436,0.00019291064,0.00052916043,0.0017582454,0.00053047313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96918947,0.014774377,0.00732218,0.0008102487,0.005061723,0.0028419686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024154156,0.00020704398,0.00028395726,0.0065704593,0.0026451903,0.0064819744,0.0012832321,0.0025378775,0.0076794494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012392793,0.00026991885,0.0002861657,0.009364755,0.0033912675,0.0064099557,0.002286578,0.0020995282,0.0013318844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012880724,0.00018056284,0.15907219,0.0015030591,0.0000696165,0.0016794946,0.06555458,0.000318481,0.0020041657,0.045864414,0.08975843,0.6338662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007030428,0.00006977517,0.32379746,0.0011688448,0.0000519515,0.0035055997,0.06356412,0.0010358403,0.0006330051,0.002206337,0.60384583,0.00011421948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06770983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15748848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06770983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004055582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028093555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13463145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123234609","doi":"","title":"Commercial Litigation Funding: Ethical, Regulatory and Comparative Perspectives","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Windsor; Principal (computer security); Commodification; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.03809475646544214,"score_gpt":0.2775871903078297,"score_spread":0.23949243384238755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123234609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02732081,0.07216118,0.0035789618,0.43440777,0.0016904046,0.00004019047,0.00006644043,0.000022843173,0.4607114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88254464,0.042012405,0.0020665363,0.047637593,0.0038709168,0.00020488311,0.000054970427,0.000046280733,0.021561742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96682346,0.019166164,0.00074251386,0.001063929,0.0070734005,0.0051305434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9466501,0.042652156,0.0023259574,0.0010572106,0.0051662023,0.002148382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034489363,0.0005372518,0.0007690723,0.006262408,0.018583527,0.0316533,0.0037687514,0.014773834,0.0052030804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03510767,0.00042091694,0.00051390874,0.010748539,0.072648786,0.013869125,0.007206932,0.008652853,0.00037864997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004085888,0.000010306677,0.00015913612,0.00005352909,0.0000012326227,0.00007710071,0.007477937,0.00005161499,0.00002965888,0.9845255,0.0042477706,0.003362202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020258747,0.00004274314,0.001990403,0.0015525819,0.000013218698,0.00034532728,0.08297864,0.00042093455,0.00034604137,0.37543297,0.53681296,0.000043847413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06616019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06823706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06616019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040127646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03385199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29114783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123354223","doi":"10.1177/0270467607300637","title":"<i>Hoffman v. Monsanto</i> : Courts, Class Actions, and Perceptions of the Problem of GM Drift","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of Science Technology & Society","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Denial; Harm; Law and economics; Compensation (psychology); Class (philosophy); Civil procedure; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Collective action; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.008185032515739344,"score_gpt":0.23363561402489025,"score_spread":0.2254505815091509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123354223","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12988503,0.0048175487,0.002791743,0.60164547,0.00075925596,0.00008745343,0.000089089386,0.00007917052,0.25984532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84381145,0.0016685245,0.0011714288,0.12978898,0.0006724695,0.00007059006,0.00002537227,0.00003120834,0.022759974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959331,0.001082556,0.0001317977,0.0002975655,0.0014971877,0.0010577106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920099,0.005650396,0.0010992427,0.00013587487,0.0006571229,0.00044749767],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044987598,0.00017795117,0.00024576002,0.0007744199,0.009075384,0.009756565,0.0015842228,0.010349317,0.0033699325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011462804,0.00034100088,0.0003744947,0.0010033428,0.013090422,0.0041734236,0.002739424,0.009546874,0.00019005963],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031356725,0.000034138182,0.0031679566,0.00006925919,0.000010504981,0.0010302141,0.027250223,0.00014076612,0.0012010277,0.8650543,0.088564925,0.013445306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092753595,0.00017398599,0.035154186,0.0009343375,0.00009461249,0.0023429852,0.1160659,0.0016747228,0.0042749294,0.22448243,0.6143041,0.00040492593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14228803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2014858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9909246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00950242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00850278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28291965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123617422","doi":"","title":"Contracting Out of Access to Justice: Enforcement of Forum Selection Clauses in Consumer Contracts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Redress; Scrutiny; Legislature; Forum shopping; Enforcement; Business; Selection (genetic algorithm); Consumer protection; Inherent powers; Economic Justice; Intervention (counseling); Choice of law; Law and economics; Common law; Law; Political science; Economics; Constitution","score_opus":0.02458728696266504,"score_gpt":0.2936206095375613,"score_spread":0.26903332257489626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123617422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7137048,0.0011576293,0.033064753,0.014373013,0.00008138553,0.0005843407,0.00016889129,0.000060144568,0.23680499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921176,0.00016101474,0.0030344217,0.00081915635,0.00002275789,0.000050221228,0.000024732852,0.00000680097,0.0037633947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97099304,0.00911929,0.0017473837,0.0020230766,0.010577134,0.0055401274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.936835,0.040965226,0.008963362,0.0048025628,0.0071918657,0.0012420465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02728231,0.00021391938,0.00044477958,0.0028634365,0.008130498,0.009296762,0.002216606,0.0045886445,0.00479362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.082016006,0.00046116934,0.00046940608,0.0033758665,0.015211097,0.0071424646,0.0038449557,0.004288888,0.00023458585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072328745,0.00015451839,0.038585663,0.00011480586,0.00003094213,0.0015751498,0.03867489,0.0010384638,0.0011250203,0.8735421,0.0040129903,0.041073117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028286365,0.00021665025,0.231112,0.001569499,0.00024975132,0.0017956381,0.094338976,0.01913981,0.0068046893,0.49111375,0.15298755,0.0003888029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32067642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4478451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32067642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019567953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029173566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63761973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123930796","doi":"","title":"Introduction: Current Socio-Legal Perspectives on Dispute Resolution","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Political science; Legal research; Law; Survey data collection; Survey research; Geography; Sociology; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.22772899441542213,"score_gpt":0.48734671177699285,"score_spread":0.2596177173615707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123930796","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023963943,0.14964211,0.0057657254,0.44837964,0.0024634583,0.00002334621,0.00028011407,0.00003263328,0.36944896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7724597,0.14230289,0.0030798956,0.046614174,0.00952118,0.000104594525,0.00032703954,0.00006776756,0.025522783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915842,0.0048748744,0.00035804985,0.0007661417,0.0018567545,0.00055995997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98012334,0.014425011,0.0018708538,0.0007632555,0.0016928704,0.0011247068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00708157,0.00039720064,0.00043613312,0.0043101693,0.006469129,0.012998908,0.0024735453,0.006239943,0.018748738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01089696,0.00029883182,0.00044895365,0.007877314,0.029480908,0.014914643,0.004670391,0.0055553094,0.0023402325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012331467,0.00003387874,0.0012120318,0.00027460878,0.0000032830374,0.00007568627,0.024453463,0.00009620077,0.00002580069,0.93113756,0.02214289,0.020532278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008205798,0.000021137283,0.0025094622,0.0012319436,0.0000037924392,0.00034815026,0.05379344,0.00021909388,0.000053160813,0.32270727,0.61908764,0.000016605136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005270613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034401712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018748738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006679471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031746468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062720776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124578864","doi":"","title":"Mobile and Web-based Legal Apps: Opportunities, Risks and Information Gaps","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of law and technology","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mobile apps; Internet privacy; Business; World Wide Web; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.03149029417844041,"score_gpt":0.2388607020320292,"score_spread":0.2073704078535888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124578864","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13351987,0.104815215,0.007793034,0.52919483,0.0025778916,0.00014963344,0.001544038,0.0003187892,0.22008677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81597227,0.11111515,0.011532693,0.032681823,0.0060996916,0.00036540432,0.0010773242,0.00018288825,0.020972827],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99458057,0.0020194307,0.00035439813,0.00046138818,0.0019041678,0.00068005297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90829545,0.07216103,0.0040859883,0.001799129,0.009515767,0.0041427366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011879976,0.00035712856,0.00051373045,0.0040005404,0.0027598708,0.014286412,0.0019836014,0.005189179,0.024357064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03696112,0.00042955147,0.0004181947,0.0034723172,0.0038614557,0.030724926,0.004877819,0.004542089,0.0032551575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036237083,0.00057706586,0.020703716,0.0011493838,0.000026014573,0.00075050944,0.008988305,0.00030460404,0.00055931613,0.18693958,0.07072048,0.7089187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090231435,0.0005224745,0.03031388,0.010906105,0.00010516217,0.002736155,0.047590002,0.0028912567,0.00120807,0.20140244,0.70205545,0.00017876479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005610318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011317493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024357064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021959434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006190455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08148247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125255200","doi":"","title":"Shift Happens: Pressure on Foreign Attorney-Fee Paradigms From Class Actions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Supreme court; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Liability; Civil procedure; Res judicata; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05653539633804575,"score_gpt":0.29704541234216847,"score_spread":0.24051001600412272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125255200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11046614,0.0035563698,0.005027847,0.23428984,0.0017952782,0.000038035007,0.00008578771,0.000068926645,0.64467174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.940772,0.0011292293,0.0007568475,0.034836587,0.0007869819,0.000049285605,0.00003464142,0.000071597926,0.021562986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908819,0.002828773,0.00024499244,0.0013617525,0.0026300335,0.0020526084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990726,0.0054719993,0.0008218095,0.00080377737,0.0012927878,0.000883662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00957227,0.0002490596,0.00036408487,0.0011590581,0.009573704,0.018523395,0.0015022649,0.007667083,0.009186404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019199375,0.0002188547,0.0006309875,0.00136682,0.023824014,0.019394558,0.0069138855,0.012897456,0.001056634],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000143356565,0.000020928514,0.0011282316,0.000020114167,0.0000034334018,0.00010253154,0.011248212,0.000041465933,0.00013464733,0.9682049,0.010204351,0.008876954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026443759,0.000058360845,0.0055544674,0.0003746149,0.000015405603,0.00023564685,0.057830274,0.000513175,0.0008322902,0.5113421,0.42314327,0.00007390805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012885084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012151273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018523395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01172529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006606255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08507335},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3125316057","doi":"","title":"Cloudy Weather, with Occasional Sunshine: Consumer Loans, the Legislature, and the Supreme Court of Japan","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Statute; Dismissal; Legislature; Notice","score_opus":0.010741343310158424,"score_gpt":0.21248374181080873,"score_spread":0.20174239850065032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125316057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26305017,0.022950098,0.0029102277,0.3246146,0.0021422482,0.00007065513,0.00012564997,0.0000781732,0.38405818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91704154,0.0029477938,0.00071454135,0.045594495,0.0011676577,0.000060917482,0.000029650473,0.000052818075,0.032390717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929322,0.0021347452,0.00033066625,0.0009445974,0.0014175719,0.002240203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99381965,0.0034364075,0.0006722474,0.00020367556,0.0010202919,0.0008477608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008881536,0.0002503149,0.00050596875,0.0010061743,0.024816921,0.017157665,0.0013479667,0.014542466,0.0037247792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013417812,0.00066221226,0.0005475471,0.0017112251,0.018743517,0.0060858894,0.005352171,0.012397445,0.00041725373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031325908,0.00003451,0.0026914892,0.00003554321,0.000019633806,0.0010959387,0.020455608,0.00021338458,0.00046177834,0.9282137,0.03969268,0.0070544225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013183765,0.00007782813,0.020020334,0.00050029694,0.00020637998,0.0004281969,0.049774587,0.0020892974,0.0013416286,0.28236258,0.64275163,0.0003153486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14650315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19208899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14650315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015493877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01544952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29130083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125565119","doi":"","title":"Mediation essentials: The definitive deskbook","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Appeal; Party-directed mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Lawyer supported mediation; Political science; Psychology; Transformative mediation; Family mediation; Law; Online dispute resolution","score_opus":0.010723638236521395,"score_gpt":0.21981439933584715,"score_spread":0.20909076109932576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125565119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015017125,0.033255164,0.024962673,0.2002447,0.048146214,0.00013483266,0.0006086505,0.0010746532,0.69007146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10100686,0.030793937,0.02878367,0.06928274,0.021814529,0.0005074964,0.0011878379,0.0019031535,0.7447198],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869611,0.0043973955,0.00085577054,0.0008384648,0.005972484,0.00097466324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854897,0.0054345895,0.00053802517,0.0024692258,0.00439942,0.0016690355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0118284775,0.00090803404,0.0009787234,0.001870084,0.005557939,0.016491454,0.0022866663,0.007434127,0.07803476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039244983,0.0009158022,0.00081069133,0.0013643074,0.010394522,0.01790825,0.009839156,0.012480986,0.024034396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003927027,0.000017008073,0.000047068403,0.00019378639,0.0000054091065,0.00007531652,0.0008386914,0.000078409306,0.00013158303,0.47352645,0.48224974,0.042797226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007852768,0.000009543762,0.000046437483,0.00031689982,0.0000039191063,0.000086294865,0.0003410845,0.0000413215,0.00010136196,0.062715724,0.93631667,0.0000127912845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036072428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043111923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07803476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005346587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011684587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26105225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125727772","doi":"","title":"THE “ILLUSION OF COMPENSATION”: CY PRÈS DISTRIBUTIONS IN CANADIAN CLASS ACTIONS","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Class action; Class (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Compensation (psychology); Dispose pattern; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Finance; Psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.027909516866580775,"score_gpt":0.24963464977016406,"score_spread":0.22172513290358328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125727772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17565742,0.014058692,0.010327851,0.07636216,0.0005467491,0.000110354486,0.00025449702,0.000091435795,0.7225908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96477026,0.0036551084,0.0015020568,0.0065487,0.00010354796,0.000023465967,0.000033106142,0.000022796263,0.023340994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98263794,0.0030112304,0.00038695175,0.0013357075,0.008985245,0.0036430627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893329,0.00426911,0.00092492107,0.00054070906,0.004325563,0.00060679595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00865258,0.0003035343,0.00034015294,0.002955204,0.01957131,0.012661796,0.0020855654,0.003268695,0.0035625787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021465048,0.00043133003,0.00039574888,0.0036429446,0.02245494,0.0033902314,0.0036148247,0.0053932955,0.0001658913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001547141,0.0000066424154,0.0019558393,0.000043193868,0.00000789513,0.00013340324,0.0077145174,0.000384815,0.00015489783,0.9615791,0.009646182,0.01835809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005112359,0.00005764679,0.03725128,0.0006433721,0.00011449179,0.00030622826,0.031042451,0.0028086524,0.0016714946,0.13135909,0.7944136,0.00028053904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9737325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9854011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11348915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11348915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.106574535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8234253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125739230","doi":"","title":"Collaborative Family Law and Gender Inequalities: Balancing Risks and Opportunities","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Settlement (finance); Process (computing); Work (physics); Family law; Power (physics); Law; Political science; Inequality; Legal process; Empirical research; Law and economics; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1207567725947849,"score_gpt":0.2813467608021537,"score_spread":0.1605899882073688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125739230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5793262,0.017517168,0.008744874,0.09447222,0.00051250734,0.00008241669,0.000087617474,0.000027003207,0.29923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99445975,0.0015051427,0.00037404985,0.0009966574,0.00011397991,0.000025053756,0.0000051792445,0.0000038009678,0.002516411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946339,0.0029158497,0.000091845344,0.00033217817,0.0006836516,0.0013425058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926905,0.0045374427,0.00096658315,0.00026364942,0.00033609752,0.001205757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005386767,0.0002661389,0.00031653797,0.0013802672,0.008679452,0.0062997714,0.000834916,0.002135087,0.008076728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013272845,0.00015959905,0.00022163543,0.0008464729,0.014664669,0.00643145,0.008266498,0.0018026901,0.00022112693],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011266663,0.00013402775,0.050256994,0.00016132626,0.000024257037,0.0012304884,0.10523592,0.00020127643,0.0002547959,0.6772385,0.0045046974,0.1606451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004616522,0.00030068716,0.05703097,0.0015760997,0.000055955406,0.0031752472,0.3924072,0.00069814676,0.00061025796,0.41321984,0.13080724,0.00007224262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00796958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018154532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008679452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038418577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040800637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028488278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126456561","doi":"10.1017/9781108770927.016","title":"The Emergence and Reform of the New Zealand Class Action","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Civil procedure; Class (philosophy); Political science; Law; Action (physics); Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Law and economics; Subject matter; Sociology; Computer science; State (computer science); Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.023690387719743033,"score_gpt":0.19881783267311104,"score_spread":0.17512744495336802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126456561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04981941,0.022114193,0.03142408,0.327195,0.0045971223,0.000715588,0.00030940006,0.00038072176,0.56344444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54002446,0.0136917895,0.049834877,0.061919697,0.0015135857,0.0006914995,0.00025192782,0.00023962282,0.33183253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814403,0.0021175153,0.0011813019,0.003539518,0.009345972,0.0023753413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98489755,0.003264812,0.0019895693,0.0019230683,0.0049805897,0.0029442986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019430319,0.0004932981,0.000664152,0.0020429445,0.0058351234,0.011093573,0.0032865393,0.007132699,0.0076903184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03382723,0.0008160391,0.0011341117,0.0013397583,0.020791031,0.0072245784,0.0066559142,0.012726973,0.001426518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029081173,0.00005020901,0.00090221263,0.00024631742,0.0000103665925,0.00040926074,0.00490271,0.00041161219,0.0014885615,0.8898358,0.027592367,0.074121594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005815653,0.00011319585,0.012332621,0.0005459012,0.000020214,0.00040035695,0.0017662159,0.000999158,0.000713742,0.07376137,0.9091728,0.00011623161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48675144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47737503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48675144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043954313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08448217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96783644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127946555","doi":"10.1017/9781108770927.007","title":"Cold Facts from the Great White North","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); White (mutation); White paper; Class (philosophy); Law; Political science; History; Law and economics; Sociology; Art; Philosophy; Visual arts; Epistemology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.024938622732502035,"score_gpt":0.17719447229286522,"score_spread":0.1522558495603632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127946555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027257027,0.027005961,0.00043147942,0.048348576,0.0036115774,0.000013644379,0.0002122998,0.000042277083,0.9176086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041556325,0.010217963,0.0003045838,0.02234937,0.0007932866,0.000019852572,0.000112351554,0.00011212741,0.92453414],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897754,0.00014865285,0.00002650093,0.00014794739,0.0004817611,0.00021766113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994112,0.00023420058,0.000029159255,0.000054712305,0.00018286724,0.000087757144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000932497,0.0004205662,0.0003457506,0.0011364488,0.0128094265,0.0063779145,0.0007892655,0.0024350942,0.02859932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019818377,0.00039607423,0.00025127205,0.0013224392,0.005696844,0.0033697723,0.0025774646,0.00566534,0.004929118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016994147,0.000011676242,0.00015232388,0.00007101738,0.0000038314565,0.00021411141,0.0070286863,0.000057584944,0.00011823893,0.3957009,0.57476217,0.021862427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014251575,0.0000010738895,0.00023179495,0.00009272811,0.0000013844289,0.000022661477,0.0011409016,0.000010011494,0.000035359662,0.007312676,0.9911466,0.0000033230112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5345196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82704157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4654804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014015654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011843887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9364434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128822049","doi":"10.1017/9781108770927.019","title":"Class Actions in Australia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Jurisdiction; Jurisprudence; Class action; Class (philosophy); Political science; Law; Legislature; Action (physics); High Court; State (computer science); Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05619899112558568,"score_gpt":0.229420445771609,"score_spread":0.17322145464602332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128822049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008450871,0.009377151,0.0013817098,0.00901554,0.00096828485,0.000050674385,0.000015595751,0.000042522857,0.97069764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15889508,0.008296863,0.0018432471,0.009293996,0.0003914424,0.000097499906,0.000031449305,0.00007329735,0.8210771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982534,0.00040582498,0.000052338477,0.00021209703,0.0007527105,0.00032361917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992618,0.0002517033,0.00006234444,0.000096000214,0.00017099043,0.00015727806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001351693,0.0003234932,0.0002797052,0.0009326209,0.0077077756,0.0055926163,0.0010033156,0.0034487923,0.013704192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028548383,0.00030284806,0.0003666481,0.00092182576,0.008620229,0.0037473927,0.0048407377,0.0054925447,0.0025746552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040783593,0.000021703685,0.00011715124,0.00006007777,0.0000012886574,0.00010536298,0.01806379,0.00007887877,0.00021264674,0.90267813,0.032654855,0.046001982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014568377,0.000010827357,0.00058344856,0.00012009099,0.0000014043861,0.00007678073,0.0011624821,0.00006567296,0.00009914639,0.021631146,0.9762418,0.0000056396493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072911344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07864276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072911344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01049018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011488384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14497393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132227458","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3782887","title":"Privacy Class Actions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Internet privacy; Computer security; Business; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.017725889202472953,"score_gpt":0.249091123675564,"score_spread":0.23136523447309104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132227458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065986314,0.00034476497,0.0077467402,0.010275769,0.001237604,0.00037678357,0.00087399775,0.00040840148,0.97213733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21533352,0.00032978173,0.0040730163,0.016455831,0.0010481786,0.0006137968,0.00079003954,0.00032244215,0.76103336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9732468,0.0047264053,0.001391993,0.0036584323,0.011241704,0.005734729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9749439,0.008694839,0.0016522286,0.0077275736,0.0055217864,0.0014596755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01225844,0.0006882797,0.00085963507,0.002393339,0.009878186,0.013514865,0.0026433219,0.010686934,0.10937424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042156275,0.0008078057,0.0013144586,0.0014451162,0.0039968863,0.007870106,0.0067551597,0.013011057,0.029902635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006609175,0.00007886999,0.0011775383,0.000060590693,0.000012598791,0.0001632095,0.0017972911,0.000074198346,0.0003636267,0.8458991,0.11967075,0.030636111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000261259,0.00003423446,0.0013878233,0.00012609712,0.000033976077,0.0003173351,0.0011497863,0.00037413934,0.0018361273,0.10342055,0.89124763,0.000046194422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009093347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008549531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10937424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041657537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007373336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3658933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132434827","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.14058071.v1","title":"Reforming New Zealand's Class Action Procedures to Enhance Efficiency and Improve Access to Justice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Class action; Statute; Political science; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Law; Business; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.018394651804208087,"score_gpt":0.32656514238520723,"score_spread":0.30817049058099916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132434827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1382318,0.0040963474,0.062812485,0.06801883,0.0022754772,0.0031195856,0.00055597426,0.0013293535,0.71956015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55313885,0.0037951542,0.100116774,0.02664586,0.0007093862,0.0014507058,0.00037729403,0.00044990217,0.31331608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785311,0.002807838,0.0017205597,0.0028551754,0.010586811,0.0034984658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836519,0.0035505062,0.0027865586,0.0026540202,0.0057810294,0.0015759935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021060143,0.00061199616,0.00064352463,0.0033167722,0.0066975923,0.008771731,0.0035277524,0.005924848,0.012902332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033496484,0.001018011,0.0015202673,0.0015933417,0.008645293,0.006498168,0.0046612807,0.008291661,0.003095833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015617519,0.00040609675,0.006831754,0.0007883601,0.00008837702,0.0011536978,0.010655943,0.0025554027,0.014337485,0.747909,0.050999954,0.16411772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022335099,0.0004741621,0.041045107,0.00092653616,0.00021032008,0.0007732283,0.0029869473,0.004113148,0.008815505,0.03752343,0.9024491,0.00045913077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34082374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35073185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34082374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020284906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07060301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67767984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133879727","doi":"","title":"The Doors to Justice Are Open, but How Do I Get In?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Economic Justice; Class (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Social psychology; Perception; Political science; Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Geography; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.010435544776892024,"score_gpt":0.2397393613074191,"score_spread":0.2293038165305271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133879727","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13598472,0.010396776,0.008657414,0.6014052,0.0055986224,0.000089449255,0.00008488421,0.00021374779,0.23756924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9223509,0.0035640236,0.0018924819,0.03735682,0.0013360373,0.00008057939,0.000040998835,0.00012727019,0.033250798],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895028,0.005000398,0.00022143451,0.0007959324,0.001705765,0.0027736193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884481,0.0031671277,0.001966863,0.001014544,0.0010242224,0.004379135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074504805,0.0003630693,0.0006986347,0.0009289972,0.021088423,0.016628828,0.0014267531,0.0050869463,0.011301834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032572746,0.00026746574,0.00049580313,0.0008360374,0.034803487,0.01720884,0.009257672,0.012671427,0.0023585057],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000931681,0.00023778561,0.013789006,0.00022738747,0.000071148774,0.0012289707,0.47560576,0.00013837674,0.0013123062,0.2762775,0.11316762,0.11785103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012731859,0.000119833836,0.0051672086,0.0004627275,0.000021629343,0.00066065055,0.4352702,0.00008902306,0.00038448407,0.06686517,0.4908666,0.000079756384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072790645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008291382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021088423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033448217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00504433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039402366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134648257","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canadian Legislation, Court Cases & Related Information Online (freely available): Alberta","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Internet privacy; Law; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.05576781201278337,"score_gpt":0.2946399232839777,"score_spread":0.23887211127119434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134648257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017048115,0.0017615358,0.00090510567,0.0041952436,0.0006491796,0.0012084376,0.22095734,0.001178605,0.7674397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0048237448,0.0019604373,0.0023923009,0.0008542027,0.00007851799,0.00050256087,0.041745797,0.0004659343,0.9471766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679583,0.00016536762,0.00016558872,0.00022836647,0.0021400366,0.00050475105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817321,0.0026277006,0.0003406666,0.00075629,0.013353196,0.001190087],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033214507,0.0010264458,0.00093069114,0.013343743,0.00902062,0.00669782,0.0026953316,0.002447033,0.4917198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012634606,0.0013709806,0.0005422832,0.019629959,0.0016325192,0.0023360015,0.001480186,0.0020893656,0.12704013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000896005,0.000016490478,0.00021495551,0.000080889076,8.839314e-7,0.000012226409,0.000135853,0.000054442793,0.000024354153,0.002606473,0.98417574,0.012668765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015102316,0.000005777305,0.0041833743,0.0002703431,0.0000057264992,0.000013908541,0.00072541053,0.00011527612,0.00012211704,0.0011324469,0.99338996,0.000020502728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97980887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4917198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052511483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17743503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135288029","doi":"10.1504/ijbg.2020.10035905","title":"Online Mediation in Resolving Divorce Matter: A Literature Review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Business and Globalisation","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Adaptability; Political science; Psychology; Public relations; Online dispute resolution; Online participation; Social psychology; Alternative dispute resolution; Sociology; Law; Computer science; The Internet; Economics; Management; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02481237251989263,"score_gpt":0.3035057109970181,"score_spread":0.27869333847712546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135288029","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017642778,0.998546,0.00007300655,0.00022456101,0.00005012076,0.000008745823,0.000011486654,0.0000025942256,0.0009072012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015530469,0.9980388,0.0001474907,0.000109430104,0.00004381525,0.000009303768,0.000013366974,0.000001128052,0.000083626095],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819994,0.00064119376,0.00034797724,0.0002053336,0.0005033968,0.00010216102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879935,0.009681795,0.0008580745,0.00016848795,0.001081416,0.00021672112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037494279,0.00090075517,0.0018282572,0.0073294435,0.0010106142,0.0027635177,0.001797106,0.0022399237,0.0063112266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010188101,0.00060718984,0.0012381603,0.010353337,0.0014755642,0.0033741726,0.0014810546,0.0017043899,0.0012146854],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006865845,0.00015748965,0.00070481875,0.13455029,0.00021383629,0.00031957388,0.00087625266,0.00030999634,0.00023611578,0.0061196163,0.013383064,0.8430603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002412667,0.00017947219,0.0047296216,0.22776327,0.0009342791,0.0019208164,0.0023415277,0.00019005785,0.0004659827,0.003482077,0.7579081,0.000060679202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048616417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008246987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073294435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014545213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068664895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021113217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138972855","doi":"","title":"Plus or Minus America: Spanski, Geoblocking Technology, and Personal Jurisdiction Analysis for Nonresident Defendants","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.02004947324064026,"score_gpt":0.254182097477762,"score_spread":0.23413262423712172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138972855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5912899,0.002374938,0.009591948,0.017106542,0.00020798518,0.00018235513,0.000140843,0.000064338084,0.37904105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97752964,0.00089550193,0.0014145818,0.004368848,0.00013394197,0.00009455422,0.000048314483,0.00001592158,0.015498692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99395037,0.0012384943,0.00032947375,0.00079043733,0.0020767911,0.0016144324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99166274,0.0048951753,0.0010209535,0.0005086503,0.0011842218,0.00072838075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005004998,0.0003908212,0.0005558909,0.0031417918,0.009367879,0.008577233,0.0020456237,0.00749283,0.0062952866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014933388,0.00043969203,0.0008410556,0.0019791403,0.009002173,0.008563572,0.00587017,0.008466273,0.0005904293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049770853,0.00013165626,0.014953294,0.00006774705,0.00002811734,0.002868914,0.008534846,0.0008054916,0.00083939434,0.95201254,0.0057191383,0.013989179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013356216,0.0007588585,0.061781332,0.0016247345,0.0007611677,0.007815869,0.07933025,0.011616454,0.01057365,0.6055959,0.219547,0.00046118774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030307494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044915594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030307494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004422414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067651393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060262203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142149213","doi":"","title":"Mediating in the Shadow of Australian Law: Structural Influences on ADR","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Shadow (psychology); Lawyer supported mediation; Dispute resolution; Dispute mechanism; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Psychology","score_opus":0.009582367694420342,"score_gpt":0.24081824181374892,"score_spread":0.23123587411932858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142149213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5194301,0.001497517,0.0038242228,0.020138336,0.00011056956,0.00025321625,0.000095638345,0.000049009155,0.45460135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98865765,0.0004597884,0.0009459471,0.0009104196,0.000030005194,0.00004274064,0.00001396737,0.000023705792,0.008915645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751473,0.013875665,0.00081952545,0.0013971848,0.005246271,0.0035140568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9562623,0.023594866,0.0051635792,0.0039451006,0.0073047318,0.0037295616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015828714,0.00023300362,0.0005149021,0.0023500423,0.010037414,0.010560226,0.0022988478,0.0015415738,0.021012485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06469405,0.00042464532,0.000428265,0.0036432857,0.011636454,0.005578965,0.008851433,0.003293094,0.0013439821],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019082174,0.0005326432,0.055248752,0.000366477,0.000071947645,0.001354839,0.20248619,0.0006674965,0.002263807,0.6111292,0.0053594457,0.12032837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010512661,0.0004376413,0.3660547,0.0010597726,0.00020101253,0.00093786157,0.19026111,0.003482929,0.0013958067,0.21177453,0.22412643,0.00016304532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.098947376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10788704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098947376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015336503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015199059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19674289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3144413542","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3512227","title":"Class Actions: Objectives, Experiences and Reforms (Final Report)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; Université de Montréal; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Political science; Process management; Psychology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.013537023245573751,"score_gpt":0.24816366008036916,"score_spread":0.2346266368347954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3144413542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2804938,0.0131338565,0.004511185,0.06900423,0.007421461,0.0027481506,0.009353175,0.00052303914,0.612811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41816914,0.0029988615,0.0024184885,0.0045356397,0.0008369894,0.0014301795,0.0034348324,0.00019377924,0.5659821],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535674,0.000923275,0.00017978463,0.00021990438,0.0012463956,0.002073889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99442965,0.00098044,0.000496016,0.00039556858,0.0012162869,0.0024820112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006585063,0.00036351645,0.000379689,0.0015623658,0.006262993,0.010891473,0.0023737813,0.004121703,0.060491003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009124034,0.0002962109,0.0005869827,0.002272895,0.0016970298,0.004378381,0.0055128103,0.0032463123,0.009306332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009139119,0.0026139931,0.024169391,0.00053382333,0.000024463265,0.0006663838,0.022801142,0.00066056236,0.0010261247,0.1260553,0.46760556,0.35292938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013825171,0.00035682713,0.066719815,0.00034001778,0.000022974917,0.00018100115,0.031771872,0.00019972141,0.0015605923,0.006570765,0.8920714,0.00006671334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04680616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05253847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060491003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00429195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011738879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20236254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151827019","doi":"","title":"Unconscionable Inaccess to Justice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Economic Justice; Arbitration; Doctrine; Law and economics; Business; Law; Undue influence; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.007869139988595751,"score_gpt":0.23260079213879245,"score_spread":0.2247316521501967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151827019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047467545,0.0017609929,0.011802705,0.06489517,0.0009870887,0.00037372592,0.0002887638,0.00017195384,0.8722521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85071576,0.00095610134,0.005222013,0.05499004,0.000575536,0.00023745683,0.00011490966,0.000116992924,0.08707112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9559979,0.005471477,0.0019174259,0.003960107,0.021906931,0.010746117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818548,0.007645802,0.0010787102,0.0023668157,0.006061926,0.0009919803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016861703,0.00058167597,0.00077757053,0.0014379806,0.015458689,0.012915038,0.005012676,0.016900716,0.007750064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055661254,0.00078634155,0.0010842491,0.0015028236,0.028848514,0.0054008593,0.005458133,0.013622835,0.0012798175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013918454,0.000019963007,0.0011185952,0.000025607816,0.000013667392,0.00029849925,0.0031516755,0.00019616686,0.0002046937,0.9751354,0.015042751,0.004778942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009752571,0.00007434487,0.00877754,0.0006227922,0.00013942826,0.00060768187,0.007137332,0.0033328007,0.0028603477,0.54883605,0.42724836,0.00026584847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6515709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6928259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6515709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023924122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06408471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70096207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153766830","doi":"","title":"Arbitration and Mediation of IP and IT Disputes in Québec","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TDM","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Mediation; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.011453105091102663,"score_gpt":0.21836420190314593,"score_spread":0.20691109681204325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153766830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3850176,0.005343602,0.009147276,0.021977374,0.00029297423,0.000358261,0.00070680253,0.00011935526,0.57703674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9085779,0.0005794158,0.0017889335,0.0007809253,0.000038284503,0.00006589726,0.0001056809,0.000018631847,0.08804441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931524,0.0024960048,0.0002769979,0.00047915656,0.0014351568,0.0021602795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99079037,0.005399511,0.0005920094,0.0005226458,0.0020296394,0.0006658931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007397354,0.0001918075,0.00045999757,0.001515971,0.011567022,0.0093009705,0.002438233,0.0030513376,0.017756589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016336832,0.0003149402,0.00046196018,0.002227794,0.003919499,0.0018656185,0.0026262992,0.0030092516,0.0006262754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033441596,0.00021262042,0.022142775,0.00024037926,0.00007592328,0.0024980272,0.010953779,0.013473873,0.0010339317,0.82278574,0.035241313,0.09100728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003809864,0.00016967191,0.08692212,0.00059641246,0.0001373534,0.00066298107,0.022295889,0.06538469,0.0027482263,0.073052384,0.74743176,0.00021762548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97444534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9788334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0764221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0764221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0704873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5544838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154346497","doi":"","title":"Big Data, Bigger Disruption: Is Institutional Arbitration Ready?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Dispute resolution; Business; Online dispute resolution; Big data; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Alternative dispute resolution; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05783808971118366,"score_gpt":0.2625459138744302,"score_spread":0.20470782416324657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154346497","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006673656,0.014743534,0.01411401,0.8952532,0.004810365,0.00006471837,0.00025982,0.00026983867,0.06381088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6019918,0.03373541,0.018025123,0.2935557,0.02466927,0.0005064371,0.0007690509,0.001042662,0.025704544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9599247,0.020581836,0.002061578,0.003162879,0.009658875,0.0046102023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90218276,0.055371135,0.009252237,0.013154494,0.009240618,0.010798841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06253339,0.00062356424,0.0017189664,0.00249298,0.009504612,0.039881706,0.0035812997,0.012889306,0.028801048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13540478,0.00069582637,0.0013085534,0.0049033533,0.03132435,0.07080833,0.015911072,0.02034107,0.007433687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017206355,0.000092233015,0.0020133292,0.00038213778,0.000070950766,0.00015912062,0.002901217,0.000393903,0.00022701257,0.8423236,0.090100445,0.061163884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040043647,0.00003127454,0.00078763894,0.0005180526,0.0000202608,0.00008106523,0.0035244226,0.0004452724,0.00021514684,0.82460976,0.16967908,0.00004803689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034064064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021106629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06253339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056923754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0149898175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33071214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157286340","doi":"10.1002/alt.21891","title":"‘I Sometimes Catch Myself Looking Angry or Tired …’: The Impact of Mediating by Zoom","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Zoom; Psychology; Social psychology; The Internet; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01877361661552804,"score_gpt":0.28889672967920654,"score_spread":0.2701231130636785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157286340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34907925,0.007273712,0.003877837,0.28691196,0.0020449406,0.00016742639,0.00010932232,0.00016601048,0.3503695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564231,0.002275994,0.0008912066,0.028472116,0.00029386493,0.00010528079,0.00002691188,0.00008831642,0.011423225],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96442574,0.028965898,0.00033209438,0.0009301141,0.0028599154,0.0024860804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9654508,0.024380786,0.0029393632,0.0012564602,0.0030213264,0.0029511799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020793978,0.00043259768,0.00036321802,0.0012409519,0.019321255,0.010378021,0.002045143,0.0053473455,0.019048762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065175846,0.0004685558,0.0006536564,0.0011482047,0.026884828,0.013576185,0.009224257,0.009728035,0.0020801725],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002576833,0.00033867196,0.013819832,0.0003917092,0.000081291386,0.0025148506,0.6826803,0.00017732117,0.00066449953,0.08582507,0.13299397,0.08025484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008183297,0.00012436624,0.0075843967,0.0007758941,0.00005121841,0.00094276574,0.8032822,0.0002374965,0.00043472173,0.0131911365,0.17321394,0.000079976584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026824377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044633348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026824377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007228287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047983266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10997039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157696246","doi":"10.26577/japj.2021.v97.i1.08","title":"Singapore’s judicial system (experience in the 2020 pandemic)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of actual problems of jurisprudence","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Openness to experience; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03619851052677191,"score_gpt":0.27625221757464435,"score_spread":0.24005370704787243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157696246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87175244,0.0021411304,0.00055446336,0.035633918,0.00039868036,0.000037271882,0.0002914108,0.000052350224,0.08913829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98785365,0.0007308377,0.00014181879,0.0023271227,0.000039739956,0.000013192965,0.00008726061,0.000018047094,0.00878841],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955024,0.002689932,0.00022152925,0.00024298855,0.0006627488,0.0006803789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977677,0.00051716296,0.00045363794,0.00016463494,0.00043524787,0.0006616735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004123673,0.00022354122,0.00034250124,0.00050734467,0.009030719,0.0066749677,0.0007201257,0.0023510351,0.0068406444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040732333,0.00024735148,0.00030179258,0.0012075722,0.0066655087,0.003888325,0.005047756,0.0032582115,0.0011053354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009918776,0.00015964103,0.024798565,0.00035826451,0.00002647461,0.01079968,0.7787856,0.00068825204,0.0016038902,0.06803326,0.076729454,0.037917744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002281118,0.0002644114,0.043100357,0.00030040718,0.000015033322,0.002603152,0.51752293,0.00058081624,0.000861508,0.0045871045,0.43002746,0.00011396175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04074189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07789047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04074189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067835613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005625897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08100951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157859237","doi":"","title":"지식재산 분야의 대체적 분쟁해결제도에서 온라인 분쟁해결절차의 도입방안","year":2021,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"LAW & TECHNOLOGY","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Online dispute resolution; Intellectual property; Arbitration; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Mediation; Dispute mechanism; Dispute board; Law and economics; Settlement (finance); Law; Agency (philosophy); Business; Political science; Negotiation; Sociology","score_opus":0.010673422365834698,"score_gpt":0.22628381826431346,"score_spread":0.21561039589847875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157859237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057254795,0.019780077,0.22737537,0.036702853,0.0036129144,0.00077570253,0.0005134937,0.0019107858,0.6520741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50350887,0.029516099,0.16041303,0.010875148,0.0019863572,0.00059243245,0.0017152405,0.00048931624,0.29090357],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99217755,0.0017672392,0.00048689052,0.00097411923,0.00402404,0.0005700984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913127,0.0031740202,0.0012263259,0.001250819,0.0025503957,0.00048575702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045497576,0.0004905802,0.0005336084,0.001626354,0.0027867153,0.006285004,0.0015312283,0.00204778,0.029961813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00995708,0.00033130424,0.000555229,0.0019100133,0.0025308381,0.0077596554,0.003137306,0.0025859172,0.019263776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008663641,0.0002634313,0.0048729153,0.0013186076,0.000055572236,0.0011931591,0.0024705015,0.0017103249,0.012042203,0.19855143,0.09347538,0.68395984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029224206,0.00011282972,0.003987683,0.000550051,0.000043131833,0.0017713233,0.005612128,0.005432511,0.0075103086,0.086826675,0.8880406,0.000083719046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022732595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022462008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029961813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015970774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004046088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1002323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159762856","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12574","title":"Taking a Shot: Access to Justice, Judging and eCourt","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Settlement (finance); Supreme court; Economic Justice; Dispute resolution; Law; Nova scotia; Political science; Online dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Process (computing); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08464916832842004,"score_gpt":0.3367907881952229,"score_spread":0.25214161986680284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159762856","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04849179,0.0085523,0.010422298,0.11261593,0.0009548659,0.00021316079,0.00009550803,0.0002435436,0.8184107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7802775,0.0031927163,0.0053036674,0.018957613,0.0007877374,0.00014276362,0.000072428404,0.00013931215,0.19112633],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98107797,0.009090683,0.00065899966,0.0011521581,0.004956725,0.0030634543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97581077,0.012212554,0.0012759947,0.0016592109,0.004508367,0.004533178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014016636,0.00020899886,0.0003951732,0.0019438177,0.009357459,0.0149180535,0.0016178972,0.004687325,0.037314806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042958923,0.00037279207,0.00023796721,0.0009616562,0.008279613,0.00828539,0.008095461,0.0038467553,0.0031917242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012513075,0.00029752855,0.016224943,0.00022516366,0.000024824249,0.0038855013,0.038964853,0.00026305643,0.001190246,0.34888256,0.18630342,0.40361273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003169404,0.00013345775,0.018280568,0.0005181771,0.00001918652,0.0011323238,0.020505661,0.0006027843,0.00065007363,0.07640896,0.8816463,0.000070955306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052626643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10926896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052626643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071779015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014629233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124830425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164474675","doi":"10.1017/9781108348683.006","title":"The Limits of Enforcement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Content (measure theory); Computer security; Internet privacy; Computer science; Business; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027873968886863443,"score_gpt":0.19908552156359688,"score_spread":0.17121155267673344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164474675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004182673,0.018523742,0.010610058,0.03414036,0.00044563977,0.000025638828,0.00010388837,0.000075119715,0.93189275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7666232,0.027668886,0.008493212,0.012157365,0.002122716,0.00044456642,0.00017472629,0.00028478558,0.18203059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986647,0.0047832583,0.00050222647,0.0019595756,0.0044558644,0.0016521098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794105,0.0133451875,0.0008303456,0.004015741,0.0017922138,0.0006060567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011066873,0.0005076687,0.0009649314,0.0020637126,0.0042686677,0.016740872,0.0019492556,0.00500486,0.02384637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029450288,0.0007027907,0.00084062654,0.0017677189,0.027956149,0.015252961,0.005642821,0.008251868,0.0035133911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067475607,0.000004034809,0.000051307015,0.000026182977,0.000002793943,0.0000161806,0.00020320709,0.00015191536,0.000027526119,0.98826736,0.0045734374,0.006669392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006877081,0.000006648931,0.0001690778,0.00023443878,0.0000050787203,0.000038853974,0.0002625973,0.0004260012,0.00009505711,0.9417332,0.05701494,0.0000073417914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005447319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003971687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02384637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068395757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060284114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07977402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164663803","doi":"","title":"Subcontractor Claim Management and Dispute Resolution Methods in the State of California versus the Province of British Columbia: A Case Study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Dispute resolution; Political science; Resolution (logic); Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01884769137853024,"score_gpt":0.24709610788367398,"score_spread":0.22824841650514374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164663803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9456864,0.0013239227,0.00058952835,0.0013069782,0.00003071037,0.0003311325,0.00010501268,0.000018573422,0.050607834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860225,0.0011433357,0.001241455,0.00030589927,0.000010224219,0.00015246577,0.00008903196,0.000009872488,0.011025263],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99342114,0.0023880925,0.00026894262,0.00040093285,0.0019208856,0.001599991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99000436,0.0050654695,0.00068529526,0.0004154073,0.0025719206,0.0012574793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004033311,0.00039031258,0.00041610975,0.0024792335,0.023105888,0.005171179,0.0032713355,0.002577505,0.0030901297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010672304,0.0004552695,0.00024736114,0.005316505,0.0041548447,0.00083551527,0.0024963657,0.002333649,0.00027131598],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082457304,0.0048194975,0.21868828,0.0014889794,0.00014856312,0.04915721,0.436262,0.00965107,0.0038828666,0.042013187,0.030169599,0.20289417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117057374,0.0005065439,0.13204071,0.0007982513,0.00011761408,0.004170517,0.7454208,0.006616714,0.0013022957,0.0017868542,0.10696076,0.00016187337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9223789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9728203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0776211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048363317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03988976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35090202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164705728","doi":"","title":"Consumer Collective Redress in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Yearbook of International Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Political science; Business; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.012325777542320702,"score_gpt":0.22543626488425955,"score_spread":0.21311048734193885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164705728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29407358,0.015543816,0.00047522446,0.08791332,0.0015739006,0.00013745182,0.0016182975,0.00013938581,0.59852505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50980395,0.005155487,0.00048827069,0.009415564,0.00019653948,0.00005358236,0.00041720195,0.00007952963,0.47438988],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637175,0.00017174137,0.000067074645,0.0002902416,0.0012821421,0.0018170158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961133,0.00045777153,0.00013906103,0.0001245879,0.001922102,0.0012430847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018794879,0.00025447816,0.0004706918,0.0025043706,0.025578925,0.007173142,0.0019719398,0.004204627,0.019377192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042492975,0.00050498964,0.00053175515,0.0047148927,0.0034451627,0.0013644814,0.0025524439,0.0046602054,0.0007979057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021744659,0.00018935162,0.02650265,0.0002631616,0.00005631732,0.0015585237,0.031863835,0.000759524,0.0004521917,0.36613363,0.46875867,0.10324467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002774567,0.000025809819,0.041787542,0.0001665801,0.000037656137,0.000114096656,0.020099692,0.00038243624,0.0003068939,0.0022471957,0.93474185,0.000062514264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14756855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14756855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21649523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168418648","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3465152","title":"The Speech Act of Presumption by Reversal of Burden of Proof","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Presumption; Speech act; Proof of concept; Law and economics; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.006039609129784606,"score_gpt":0.21713924502368895,"score_spread":0.21109963589390435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168418648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038179576,0.000650513,0.27433252,0.0469675,0.00344316,0.00040972285,0.00043319626,0.0005054165,0.6350784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8307051,0.0003198311,0.0585391,0.0066166096,0.0010051478,0.00048232966,0.00010304714,0.00030717684,0.10192167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811211,0.0075030206,0.00139778,0.002903905,0.0049673254,0.0021068454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697063,0.021145994,0.0011400569,0.005224756,0.0022515005,0.00053145946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01805328,0.0007244104,0.0012616725,0.0014057966,0.004722106,0.008245626,0.0030044029,0.012466174,0.01701548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058895033,0.0012681313,0.0017468752,0.000983782,0.015831262,0.01154098,0.004558058,0.013739393,0.0043951315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028619395,0.000006381424,0.000036792706,0.000014465878,0.0000050108297,0.000073725925,0.0005436088,0.00012587527,0.00026039264,0.9949269,0.0020923766,0.00188578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000728694,0.000032951295,0.00017968052,0.000060676455,0.000034714332,0.00018519071,0.00039692209,0.0031370972,0.0015868574,0.9629722,0.031304844,0.000036051817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003713482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027698616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01805328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036231228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057114745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09547603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169044383","doi":"","title":"Legal Liability in Informed Consent Cases: What are the Rules of the Game?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill journal of law and health","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Informed consent; Strict liability; Business; Law; Psychology; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.06513818182526492,"score_gpt":0.30816358505969793,"score_spread":0.243025403234433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169044383","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05208711,0.017894818,0.11387074,0.57750285,0.0018889529,0.0009549979,0.000554137,0.00012079773,0.2351256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91126597,0.0061823493,0.033100963,0.03773494,0.0027309286,0.00094576314,0.00013177318,0.00008868669,0.007818669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.84427667,0.10588077,0.008366548,0.010459502,0.022241922,0.008774601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46077323,0.51220006,0.010235042,0.00523011,0.0070776613,0.004483878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15998435,0.0014122166,0.0051207915,0.0036338212,0.00952101,0.037637416,0.009681557,0.04609578,0.010883493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40547603,0.0023940064,0.0025523189,0.0031011472,0.054869805,0.048384964,0.008733665,0.030110704,0.001934831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008004696,0.000060935497,0.00090620574,0.00012016507,0.00006532296,0.00028367533,0.0013001445,0.000964604,0.00005244504,0.9809357,0.0070454567,0.008185298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008014551,0.000014473713,0.00028455784,0.00023108855,0.00003538181,0.00010886346,0.0005044371,0.0024505286,0.00005775825,0.99229056,0.0038980432,0.000044249748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018333023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019555423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15998435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010942997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019804195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84608823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169392731","doi":"","title":"Osnove građanskog pravosuđa - prema vrijednosno-utemeljenom okviru za reformu","year":2018,"lang":"hr","type":"article","venue":"Pregled: časopis za društvena pitanja / Periodical for social issues","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"BATES; Humanities; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.03327829465637389,"score_gpt":0.31277560862809267,"score_spread":0.2794973139717188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169392731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23979044,0.019504864,0.010818336,0.10376211,0.0015913007,0.00027742298,0.00026762276,0.00018807377,0.62379986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91585666,0.0048858416,0.0045447773,0.003821825,0.00035172913,0.00014011447,0.00012715044,0.00011822328,0.07015365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99298966,0.0030457529,0.0003258192,0.00077740056,0.0018550963,0.0010062666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915679,0.002460386,0.00097214564,0.0019464146,0.0018056594,0.0012475218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007353574,0.00032309533,0.00046672637,0.0016781754,0.0061393226,0.018443843,0.0010499532,0.0022244398,0.017011747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012973134,0.00031334805,0.00047886657,0.0018817917,0.012744762,0.007716328,0.007675497,0.0045223953,0.0021439744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009766941,0.00021922114,0.008427047,0.00034893432,0.000031636962,0.00019713661,0.03607199,0.00034532492,0.0012612261,0.8625513,0.015007465,0.075440995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032924527,0.0002334822,0.019361332,0.00093302125,0.000061661936,0.00024047897,0.04598452,0.00039104608,0.0027430383,0.16870594,0.761242,0.00007049352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005385025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013701723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018443843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006469761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012343155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05690992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172594646","doi":"10.5937/rkspp2101095p","title":"The new directive on an EU-wide representative action and third-party litigation funding: An opportunity for European consumers?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revija Kopaonicke skole prirodnog prava","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Directive; Political science; Context (archaeology); Opt-out; Business; European union; Public administration; Law and economics; Public relations; Economics; Law; International trade","score_opus":0.09579492107580295,"score_gpt":0.3374772446525678,"score_spread":0.24168232357676483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172594646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04081592,0.010056496,0.019746613,0.20136502,0.004804565,0.00027136775,0.00046039422,0.00042085286,0.7220588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42608497,0.0038470882,0.022730326,0.2099951,0.0019679684,0.00060274993,0.000581241,0.00031895062,0.33387163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.981888,0.005059756,0.001142648,0.0026043854,0.006573695,0.002731587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99322236,0.003215147,0.00061240117,0.0012465824,0.0012219562,0.00048160285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016495058,0.000558142,0.0007213503,0.0010566436,0.003244108,0.013872929,0.002407291,0.027468946,0.008227078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025378788,0.00057776977,0.0017183446,0.0014734047,0.0059800637,0.008725788,0.00540335,0.011535439,0.0020265828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044039298,0.00004493129,0.00042942294,0.00008258432,0.000009255919,0.00023200343,0.0015840743,0.000117202726,0.0005754214,0.93837607,0.04066556,0.017839339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068988535,0.0000928229,0.0025388328,0.00039681012,0.000031729116,0.0003905937,0.0007538313,0.00022509904,0.0009478604,0.07365884,0.9208221,0.000072526986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014086489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013818069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027468946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004756362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0124642365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08723527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175488539","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7192","title":"Civil Revolution: User Experiences with British Columbia’s Online Court","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval; University of Windsor; Université du Québec à Montréal; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Online dispute resolution; Exploratory research; Dispute resolution; Political science; Alternative dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Law; Public administration; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Social science","score_opus":0.023583093107586682,"score_gpt":0.25257431049699947,"score_spread":0.22899121738941278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175488539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9733102,0.00026598907,0.0002748421,0.0018538525,0.000030373847,0.00004782252,0.00016809559,0.000061010152,0.023987751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802592,0.00030682576,0.00035401032,0.0010333043,0.000011023381,0.000046866862,0.00018587647,0.00005823338,0.017744673],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722594,0.0012073552,0.000094738694,0.00021534305,0.0006892091,0.00056735525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991087,0.004558971,0.00043873247,0.00049403816,0.0015482042,0.0018731449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030178935,0.00029055064,0.0004558679,0.0012052079,0.014145941,0.0064889058,0.0011038786,0.0016720855,0.009286113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010460129,0.00036371264,0.0001843367,0.0024712568,0.0036108561,0.0028940854,0.003511625,0.0019384678,0.001357594],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011865654,0.00026283285,0.018177385,0.00007316333,0.0000104559795,0.0016862347,0.93756366,0.000081503706,0.0012704477,0.0011493749,0.011817658,0.02778864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016090988,0.00010669063,0.0373338,0.0001164875,0.0000139078975,0.00041252782,0.87920845,0.0005209959,0.00042538872,0.00023586843,0.08152872,0.00008103247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6771199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82880473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3228801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01045624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064671463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6495632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181443687","doi":"","title":"Mediators Using Non-Binding Evaluations and Making Settlement Proposals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Mediation; Arbitration; Lawyer supported mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Outcome (game theory); Process (computing); Party-directed mediation; Law and economics; Political science; Negotiation; Dispute mechanism; Settlement (finance); Autonomy; Business; Law; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.018657703557983504,"score_gpt":0.29493999436843443,"score_spread":0.2762822908104509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181443687","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09635834,0.0024152405,0.5417842,0.022770857,0.001168408,0.0045257444,0.00021427833,0.00093256414,0.32983038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7839496,0.00095678715,0.17149065,0.0015547957,0.00025098393,0.0031139106,0.00022160962,0.0003659065,0.03809572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.6989251,0.23555222,0.01098513,0.007915651,0.038834285,0.007787619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7557128,0.18567102,0.013614185,0.020793837,0.020171182,0.004037019],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.22527024,0.0016909812,0.0016656695,0.005541008,0.006765661,0.028512793,0.006586027,0.008281159,0.019518012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24914126,0.0013730878,0.0019184805,0.003724664,0.012335258,0.022722453,0.02635065,0.0070487703,0.004623383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042055585,0.00028900424,0.002448036,0.0006498864,0.00011459832,0.0004338751,0.039069824,0.0026920773,0.0020818103,0.73726183,0.008423323,0.20611507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059979036,0.00049231655,0.0024514438,0.0020751522,0.00020415561,0.00042430346,0.029546931,0.017292889,0.011120516,0.7623975,0.1730707,0.00032429493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014349903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021499698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22527024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005551862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014062074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9553797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194682896","doi":"","title":"Class Actions in Canada: The Promise and Reality of Access to Justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Class (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07677247350128512,"score_gpt":0.2875630770785393,"score_spread":0.21079060357725415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194682896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060762696,0.03097989,0.0023561753,0.13983612,0.0009832261,0.00009119474,0.0007527169,0.00010140903,0.76413655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7763403,0.016279304,0.001952783,0.010479738,0.00026894422,0.00006409392,0.00029442043,0.00008816277,0.19423218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99462885,0.00047031592,0.000071836075,0.0003419385,0.0025863196,0.0019007602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722797,0.00063596765,0.00013095142,0.00014519128,0.0009839798,0.00087584316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020476815,0.00037627041,0.00040050398,0.0018195559,0.02423295,0.01676434,0.0022560616,0.0032939045,0.007880583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005391991,0.0002990299,0.0003626611,0.003940738,0.018446105,0.003078942,0.0038007246,0.004569505,0.00046968405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017638675,0.000020994281,0.0030290426,0.00009780036,0.00001454384,0.0002550257,0.032970365,0.00045938653,0.000115552175,0.7755078,0.11860035,0.06891155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000137924435,0.000013635294,0.012817985,0.00052130484,0.000031791384,0.00014866293,0.034860346,0.00064722914,0.00022602444,0.050544087,0.9001022,0.000072958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99540126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99796873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15217423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15217423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27502105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9833577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204664374","doi":"","title":"Identifying Ascertainability: A Historical and Comparative Perspective","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Law and economics; Certification; Identification (biology); Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Value (mathematics); Civil procedure; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08299823321040076,"score_gpt":0.3010627996532025,"score_spread":0.21806456644280173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204664374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014142284,0.04676203,0.029710338,0.096407294,0.0017971669,0.000079757694,0.00013338913,0.00003522296,0.8109325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84475464,0.051302813,0.014462427,0.02703973,0.004918086,0.00028003452,0.00019939418,0.00015972772,0.056883123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799329,0.01150159,0.0008545825,0.0025396051,0.0033524854,0.0018186932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730949,0.020340394,0.001303364,0.0016573536,0.0029420736,0.0006619659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032302447,0.00047262394,0.0006545238,0.0071640196,0.013726238,0.016045129,0.0027989992,0.008527918,0.0062288977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03365504,0.00054169167,0.00058228086,0.005206784,0.065960616,0.01794797,0.0061126943,0.012218636,0.000804215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021097312,0.0000037523257,0.00009405782,0.000016938457,8.391764e-7,0.000042535543,0.0022788004,0.00003135585,0.000015883219,0.9931115,0.0013203309,0.0030819187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071783857,0.0000373467,0.0011925435,0.0006810572,0.0000130472,0.00037708724,0.008965273,0.0002917138,0.0003987289,0.41305754,0.5749426,0.000035945646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037241966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03296205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037241966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02241429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010808049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17083377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204797148","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781529210002.003.0002","title":"Class Actions in Historical and Comparative Perspective","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Policy Press eBooks","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Comparative case; Political science; Sociology; Genealogy; History; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.15143208913033476,"score_gpt":0.31530843670271824,"score_spread":0.16387634757238348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204797148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012615208,0.058225747,0.0020519742,0.015019347,0.0007956121,0.000015221357,0.000047418747,0.000015007181,0.91121453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81817615,0.04983295,0.0022348305,0.005598304,0.001733342,0.0001265741,0.00011072918,0.00005753673,0.122129515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699306,0.0019477087,0.000048043345,0.00020710702,0.0004104628,0.00039352864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837637,0.0011448945,0.00010582339,0.00011535489,0.00013694356,0.00012058414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026350704,0.00046258286,0.00041146766,0.0033579348,0.006866284,0.009326291,0.0009027175,0.0023587672,0.011209551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030291812,0.0002446654,0.00020628533,0.0036783149,0.024869898,0.008276501,0.0030580491,0.0035011154,0.00072513806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023222244,0.0000055420796,0.000062212566,0.00002422085,0.0000010080518,0.000030152021,0.0064731752,0.00004259007,0.000014207966,0.98772705,0.0019708518,0.003646645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003913278,0.000014723064,0.0008859901,0.00038936784,0.0000032937144,0.00012254411,0.022149287,0.00010012523,0.00007276636,0.27085182,0.7053969,0.000009285056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011906346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017717693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012807685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012807685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020409643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09292668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206327354","doi":"10.4337/9781788978262.00005","title":"Judges and technology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Technological change; Pace; Context (archaeology); Function (biology); Economic Justice; Political science; Law and economics; Service (business); Law; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Marketing; History; Artificial intelligence; Geography","score_opus":0.01752950415817788,"score_gpt":0.20481409198638365,"score_spread":0.18728458782820576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206327354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012742192,0.012167037,0.0022757743,0.011277698,0.001158236,0.00003422389,0.000024474997,0.00003539125,0.971753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13063507,0.018280685,0.0026506616,0.009356803,0.0025266972,0.0001343723,0.000079591395,0.00012660447,0.83620954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787056,0.00074332266,0.00008440973,0.00027907264,0.0007585901,0.00026402445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855715,0.00092856353,0.00007176474,0.00012353214,0.00021134572,0.000107713764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014175829,0.00044000146,0.0003742822,0.0015352264,0.0061683194,0.010935332,0.0010617261,0.003814289,0.027957989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042160843,0.0003335121,0.00033953105,0.0016030136,0.012154113,0.007101894,0.0032226343,0.005421603,0.005780093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017046787,0.0000038978046,0.000034521654,0.000024534138,5.165005e-7,0.000028018972,0.0012343117,0.000046474655,0.000039721373,0.974865,0.016069602,0.0076516597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000368275,0.0000075974694,0.000079485406,0.0001446246,0.000001319721,0.00006771273,0.0007310991,0.000065249485,0.000075573815,0.15826766,0.8405517,0.0000044473904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039069904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061256485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027957989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052317246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003585336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09352875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208368172","doi":"","title":"Reflections on the Influence of Social Media on Judging","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of law and technology","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Internet privacy; Business; Advertising; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.033553081972432466,"score_gpt":0.2543378825169847,"score_spread":0.22078480054455224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208368172","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028045418,0.007650098,0.00071428507,0.6745734,0.0022178616,0.00002497445,0.00019751096,0.000022513832,0.28655386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85163015,0.0059401956,0.00070432766,0.10612305,0.006586619,0.000058686383,0.00006234135,0.00014056909,0.028754052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97513235,0.012652383,0.00076976785,0.0018008687,0.0076000174,0.0020446766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67135257,0.3004161,0.0050751404,0.0045453887,0.0154507,0.003160125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023054216,0.00032362647,0.0004790887,0.0032575657,0.009441818,0.02238802,0.0032045618,0.01785714,0.02318649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09675075,0.00051496836,0.000555727,0.0034635554,0.037155244,0.016727418,0.0049534542,0.016342703,0.0019417771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022633329,0.0001502154,0.0055061528,0.00026223905,0.000044118962,0.001238318,0.113043964,0.00035598566,0.0005925172,0.59765196,0.21752371,0.06340448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006598623,0.0000510483,0.008646195,0.0011404252,0.000035097364,0.00025488445,0.11250465,0.00038265344,0.0013083665,0.13762216,0.73787844,0.00011006986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13869217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15508436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13869217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01238673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009003876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27576977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213462452","doi":"","title":"On the (Data) Breach of Confidence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Data breach; Appeal; Class action; Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Political science; Law; Subject (documents); Cause of action; Reading (process); Internet privacy; Business; Supreme court; Computer science; State (computer science); History; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.023786081014593247,"score_gpt":0.2461253240623332,"score_spread":0.22233924304773994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213462452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03856183,0.0037560463,0.01607031,0.19834286,0.0011883476,0.00015233087,0.00018478167,0.0001273407,0.7416161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8643408,0.0018842197,0.0021682738,0.07209302,0.00083971256,0.00012559757,0.00006651531,0.00009259059,0.058389306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94536495,0.010090259,0.0026316026,0.006230643,0.027202448,0.008480178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9574463,0.022049956,0.0027628804,0.005511858,0.010789435,0.0014396172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020922687,0.00059862057,0.0008840153,0.002625441,0.021790404,0.022490755,0.0046021133,0.027346833,0.006727487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06763029,0.0007215353,0.001409728,0.003073509,0.0718025,0.011732591,0.013239763,0.02892207,0.0012037038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063540297,0.000005595894,0.00035829775,0.000014457835,0.000003920197,0.00019171111,0.006333911,0.00008387963,0.000073339805,0.9841283,0.0064521865,0.0023480584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047109115,0.00006400103,0.0026484604,0.000896381,0.00006623459,0.0005634635,0.021066623,0.0011620946,0.0012839342,0.44420326,0.5277884,0.00020997222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40277523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26026842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40277523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026823152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033793774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8008616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213543119","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4529733","title":"Conflict Resolution with Equitative Algorithms: A Tool to Establish A European Common Ground of Available Rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Conflict resolution; Dispute resolution; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Political science; Resolution (logic); Civil procedure; Common ground; Focus (optics); Dispute mechanism; Asset (computer security); Alternative dispute resolution; Computer science; Law and economics; Law; Artificial intelligence; Geography; Computer security; Sociology","score_opus":0.015390682548919874,"score_gpt":0.2307708813973313,"score_spread":0.21538019884841142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213543119","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004011987,0.00009216808,0.9884687,0.00032224602,0.00004173362,0.00016319704,0.00018306647,0.0015813437,0.0051355194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050881743,0.0000767054,0.9467006,0.00010478549,0.00003952197,0.00036637086,0.0004950476,0.000377033,0.0009581543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9693766,0.017754141,0.0033637597,0.0029103586,0.0059248772,0.0006702144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9183012,0.051094074,0.006859724,0.016579704,0.0061907577,0.00097451103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034565054,0.001385373,0.0015066902,0.009032888,0.0023488398,0.011803072,0.003763883,0.002779882,0.012780467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12208158,0.0008240647,0.0015707331,0.007869827,0.0039335345,0.01199442,0.009848954,0.0037453282,0.0026050739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017626086,0.00025228105,0.0030605285,0.00027723407,0.00010215799,0.00018634993,0.0030650469,0.034483574,0.0009193808,0.6802576,0.0062527014,0.27096683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001173161,0.00011513382,0.0008741083,0.00039597,0.000047568537,0.00032507692,0.001388846,0.32409376,0.004348938,0.57021755,0.09798555,0.00009021922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014517752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001044899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034565054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016773782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004106884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18279964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213799191","doi":"10.4324/9781003593058-5","title":"Isn't It Time to Shift to Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) for Passenger Claims in Europe?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Online dispute resolution; Business; Reimbursement; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Law and economics; Dispute resolution; Internet privacy; Political science; Law; Alternative dispute resolution; Computer science; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.025739311364814485,"score_gpt":0.25420229324638255,"score_spread":0.22846298188156805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213799191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046405555,0.06365627,0.00852681,0.05059736,0.004170048,0.000040896477,0.00005223396,0.00025126134,0.8680646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1228341,0.054358732,0.012198333,0.02588582,0.0033436792,0.00010012986,0.0002426039,0.00032245007,0.7807142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719906,0.0008821596,0.0001278235,0.0003135078,0.0010380062,0.0004394455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777514,0.0009951114,0.00014748465,0.00035099377,0.00047078473,0.00026042582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052182837,0.00040991022,0.000428888,0.0015325097,0.0026759785,0.017361406,0.0017427763,0.006835369,0.020026838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005103221,0.0003414646,0.0008089114,0.0023327586,0.004884453,0.017065085,0.003788575,0.005002531,0.00869393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007904893,0.000046749687,0.00016029392,0.000100093304,0.0000034939694,0.000085370804,0.0010964653,0.00018317386,0.00010449152,0.7434298,0.11552827,0.13925388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056366866,0.000015267637,0.00029753745,0.00038367667,0.000004199341,0.00019435667,0.00086235505,0.00021028299,0.00016637657,0.05147174,0.94637835,0.0000101810165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005346787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052358755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020026838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042566536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040394836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066996455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215297465","doi":"","title":"Arbitration’s Primacy? The Law Pertaining to Staying Court Proceedings in Favour of Arbitration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Dispute resolution; Arbitration clause; Federal Arbitration Act; Class action; Political science; Compulsory arbitration; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.008669886770401385,"score_gpt":0.2274632307836931,"score_spread":0.2187933440132917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215297465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022317324,0.0083094435,0.03739114,0.14385839,0.003238479,0.00021250993,0.0001901043,0.00022737733,0.7842552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83621585,0.0038957912,0.010511696,0.06690642,0.0057951426,0.0006769602,0.0001271383,0.00040420613,0.07546666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96438795,0.010662866,0.002473723,0.008885852,0.009050591,0.004539127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664284,0.021826345,0.002685213,0.0039657974,0.003827735,0.0012665204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032437477,0.00090640073,0.001983015,0.0019216213,0.016073665,0.027359296,0.005001283,0.026599875,0.014010291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072502956,0.0013387295,0.0019461289,0.0022249362,0.05288152,0.032144018,0.009873113,0.034481034,0.002714655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050972185,0.0000042764636,0.00006781717,0.000009730305,0.0000025277234,0.000044809498,0.0006379836,0.000017811108,0.000027621974,0.9956605,0.0022855524,0.0012361201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006454601,0.000029448012,0.00030003572,0.00032986235,0.000029822824,0.00022425684,0.00085627486,0.00048667853,0.00035014682,0.86517876,0.13208985,0.00006037916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047167577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027481161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047167577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012500273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0161711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17154783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217541398","doi":"10.5539/ass.v17n12p61","title":"Opportunities, Challenges and Strategies: A Current Overview of Commentaries Towards the Singapore Convention Within China","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China","keywords":"China; Convention; Ratification; Mediation; Political science; Position (finance); Dispute resolution; International trade; Law; Business; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.1674670490195565,"score_gpt":0.3271572633127821,"score_spread":0.1596902142932256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217541398","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16815083,0.11463074,0.0041784775,0.4441774,0.011354849,0.00043028462,0.0010374647,0.00020437983,0.25583556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.741988,0.0803404,0.002369327,0.094402835,0.0071013183,0.0006030469,0.0009949867,0.0002707874,0.071929105],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892896,0.0049088383,0.0010051081,0.0005847652,0.0029005904,0.001311045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97398674,0.016223755,0.0024469295,0.0009240332,0.005436594,0.0009819089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01768297,0.0007847112,0.0007366437,0.0041848305,0.009170078,0.011041591,0.0022269504,0.0045569465,0.008146664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019927444,0.00035187826,0.0009744481,0.012706241,0.007952762,0.006359625,0.006147582,0.006229662,0.00096374523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021206925,0.00009141266,0.022392934,0.006819883,0.00013739493,0.00452211,0.33054918,0.0015302404,0.0035471471,0.2694705,0.23888285,0.121844284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013168753,0.000040194212,0.010246603,0.0028296444,0.00004929928,0.00020716283,0.10929986,0.000591061,0.00075866526,0.005893061,0.8699606,0.00011071834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05179527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0741823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05179527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01164685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020285202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10298759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W35449792","doi":"","title":"Virtual Justice and the Rule of Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Adjudication; Rule of law; Legislation; Political science; Comparative law; Public law; Context (archaeology); Philosophy of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.007228582842066722,"score_gpt":0.2235663119101235,"score_spread":0.21633772906805676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W35449792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05635236,0.009871505,0.051480353,0.051755395,0.0010479535,0.00006581452,0.000054594948,0.00010270464,0.8292693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772561,0.0012703111,0.0034946536,0.0024413615,0.0004474959,0.00005035993,0.000020695601,0.000036284866,0.014982777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98751205,0.0056521385,0.00048757967,0.001958164,0.0024792673,0.0019106783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987993,0.0074975602,0.0011039367,0.0016239419,0.0010337573,0.00074777915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01012796,0.0002843669,0.0007122485,0.0018374231,0.011223914,0.015723525,0.0014508442,0.005160967,0.005385916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017190803,0.00030543163,0.000623653,0.0012159924,0.060766786,0.01007113,0.0077996245,0.0058458084,0.00082677393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021081642,0.0000040963155,0.000066348664,0.000005733219,0.000001343315,0.000022769173,0.00048397115,0.000083559295,0.000013959818,0.9971294,0.00036109422,0.0018257009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005184697,0.0000065949635,0.00012098113,0.00003063305,0.0000020961559,0.00003204104,0.0004630217,0.00018367424,0.00004161409,0.97901523,0.02009307,0.0000056293416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070232293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047461954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015723525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054755807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059333663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053562403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36959017","doi":"10.1016/j.tibs.2023.03.001","title":"La mediación en asuntos civiles y mercantiles en Grecia. Panorama actual y una perspectiva comparativa: comentario a la Ley 3898/2010","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.01713922950827381,"score_gpt":0.24560032210458974,"score_spread":0.22846109259631592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36959017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25995195,0.19717653,0.0030129259,0.093186334,0.0052812723,0.000041385912,0.0009559848,0.00022251617,0.44017118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8425824,0.060884435,0.0017751816,0.0033978885,0.0052010682,0.00005219164,0.00048831117,0.0001512882,0.08546724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967726,0.0009854787,0.00008983678,0.0003842524,0.0012081979,0.0005595774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507767,0.001981843,0.0009968865,0.0004562103,0.0011607602,0.00032666716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005132326,0.0005120619,0.0004202043,0.003179467,0.001975714,0.009145211,0.000938209,0.0023664448,0.014414892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008806117,0.0002295089,0.00040591936,0.004196222,0.0044961874,0.0060319635,0.0031497662,0.0027443655,0.0013748523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054511486,0.00014087927,0.024737632,0.0006308619,0.00008255181,0.0006102517,0.024977276,0.00050025556,0.0012313195,0.5734636,0.06036309,0.3127171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026823383,0.0000944865,0.050593626,0.00066869496,0.000040322462,0.00041549644,0.012044054,0.00033906527,0.0007413011,0.020693189,0.91430163,0.000041347794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026667714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030628521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026667714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064646993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020355948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053025007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W396992388","doi":"","title":"Price-fixing Class Actions: A Canadian Perspective","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loyola consumer law review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pfizer","keywords":"Economic Justice; Harm; Legislation; Price fixing; Class action; Class (philosophy); Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Computer science; State (computer science); Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03214368329196535,"score_gpt":0.2747515464007002,"score_spread":0.24260786310873486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W396992388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013858226,0.054208122,0.0018466616,0.27127212,0.0012335945,0.000106461834,0.00074625714,0.000052446765,0.65667605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.650468,0.13281293,0.0057188715,0.09697553,0.0015292544,0.00013027377,0.00054540863,0.00016013163,0.1116596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98959106,0.0011949672,0.00027958152,0.001103257,0.003855601,0.003975632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98866665,0.0021929722,0.0005469827,0.00022779472,0.005812251,0.0025533547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006134553,0.0009283172,0.0010215616,0.008569921,0.033141013,0.02130521,0.0052019428,0.012054818,0.021563284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011859434,0.0008613434,0.0010521134,0.008521888,0.022177268,0.007257471,0.0035539595,0.011498905,0.0011619598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001960955,0.000035079396,0.0018779747,0.0001405422,0.000013753072,0.0003890512,0.0045781783,0.00036674287,0.00013276315,0.91026986,0.06451071,0.017665874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037977374,0.000042256623,0.013502913,0.0015564042,0.000111967565,0.00045662926,0.020291364,0.0013096536,0.00024402756,0.08201225,0.8801858,0.0002487471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26026776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26026776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3045732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85798454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200222059","doi":"10.1017/9781108854306.013","title":"Multi-tier and Mixed-Method Dispute Resolution in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Skepticism; Online dispute resolution; Popularity; Political science; Law; Legislation; Resolution (logic); Computer science","score_opus":0.019512461588320613,"score_gpt":0.19630374243793464,"score_spread":0.176791280849614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200222059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010162307,0.03397191,0.01776984,0.013623689,0.0011363436,0.00023102913,0.00036545558,0.000277702,0.92246175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26323256,0.033997,0.042082984,0.0041197427,0.00025436902,0.00017964888,0.00056523667,0.00022952267,0.6553389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99372464,0.0006425639,0.00016301237,0.00034529486,0.004205568,0.0009189209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974496,0.0006270126,0.0000879828,0.00015356287,0.0012808756,0.00040102174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003751999,0.00046647087,0.0004561089,0.0025792427,0.010265108,0.010543413,0.002530212,0.0017776366,0.016129088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042425236,0.0004773965,0.00051566,0.0057892916,0.0046145786,0.0022985197,0.0039081336,0.0022332666,0.001626354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020838394,0.000031535117,0.00055768853,0.00024753154,0.000009485352,0.0002580892,0.0049340916,0.0013632373,0.00023652964,0.7606814,0.09004771,0.14161181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011627113,0.00001115559,0.0013868748,0.00035716922,0.000008255055,0.00022973206,0.0025069185,0.0026835613,0.000274555,0.037119064,0.95536715,0.000044023534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.943455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9751995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0955979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0955979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13248616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6936146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200543616","doi":"10.54795/rejub.n.1.89","title":"A FLEXIBILIZAÇÃO PROCEDIMENTAL EXTRAÍDA DA EXPERIÊNCIA DO CASE MANAGEMENT: UMA ANÁLISE QUANTO À PERTINÊNCIA DO INSTITUTO NO ÂMBITO DOS JUIZADOS ESPECIAIS","year":2021,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Judicial Brasileira","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Continental (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03638291864461469,"score_gpt":0.29207296678801825,"score_spread":0.25569004814340357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200543616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8295365,0.0005055376,0.019953074,0.001719432,0.00004351675,0.0005546296,0.00011109382,0.00014890742,0.14742732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864161,0.00027171941,0.0076069855,0.00006799175,0.000013668221,0.00013904169,0.000040813946,0.00002220794,0.005421484],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98392993,0.0075805294,0.0008169139,0.0011996604,0.005478609,0.0009942703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9403915,0.04078569,0.0054823384,0.0056241928,0.004852816,0.002863507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011245972,0.00035137645,0.00037068437,0.0035369413,0.002318468,0.008230569,0.0015283048,0.0012124031,0.0128222285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053513404,0.0002895493,0.00052728184,0.0029308954,0.004298261,0.0035230485,0.0046842387,0.001571879,0.00072488346],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054310024,0.0010944097,0.114222206,0.0014164598,0.00010122581,0.0012527675,0.26785216,0.004030223,0.011551931,0.15220681,0.0024548965,0.44327384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016453669,0.002393584,0.39372167,0.0016573429,0.00027135058,0.0018965432,0.3095633,0.009565045,0.013039598,0.07914084,0.18832725,0.00025891713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029090398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042649345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0128222285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046795877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059475064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206072896","doi":"10.32508/stdjelm.v5i3.804","title":"E-Court in resolving civil cases - Foreign experiences and recommendations for Vietnam","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science & Technology Development Journal - Economics - Law and Management","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Context (archaeology); Business; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Procedural law; Settlement (finance); Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.021940924802827153,"score_gpt":0.2527174238922709,"score_spread":0.23077649908944375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206072896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38438776,0.060178783,0.0046398784,0.2569179,0.0045011253,0.00089478696,0.00070555747,0.000242221,0.28753197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75780123,0.071944006,0.014329134,0.031475585,0.00079682964,0.0002998342,0.00118036,0.00020299274,0.121969976],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768794,0.0013204981,0.00013885976,0.00011979014,0.000263599,0.0004692537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948656,0.0014054847,0.00021201764,0.00016387203,0.0008964969,0.002456568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055396995,0.00028586632,0.00021606745,0.00083790394,0.0043604793,0.005961021,0.0014116794,0.0019493586,0.023283152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062188227,0.00023966904,0.0004314826,0.0014492444,0.0021189305,0.005523908,0.003311845,0.003041109,0.001964682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003344252,0.0040103532,0.022856867,0.0025757537,0.000047223417,0.021667417,0.16230375,0.0012183378,0.0014552614,0.05452983,0.22018208,0.5088186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008742925,0.00041266152,0.00860829,0.0017287235,0.000022011605,0.0054800315,0.31311756,0.00062888034,0.00072880887,0.0084435735,0.6606718,0.00007025204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023234993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042193945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023283152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002735862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010413585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07788992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221126305","doi":"10.1177/09646639221088529","title":"Book Review: Dispute Resolution in China: Litigation, Arbitration, Mediation, and their Interactions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Mediation; Dispute resolution; China; Alternative dispute resolution; Political science; Law; Online dispute resolution; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015527740736148436,"score_gpt":0.27587493846449207,"score_spread":0.26034719772834364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221126305","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003625509,0.93721443,0.0002170299,0.021091798,0.020232094,0.000049749113,0.00039202537,0.00003210963,0.020408304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037245753,0.91193,0.0002386602,0.0072786007,0.014881061,0.0000845491,0.000557121,0.000031597247,0.06127376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991478,0.00015252393,0.000059129994,0.000090310925,0.00047412503,0.000076125616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99616736,0.0015566213,0.00030106527,0.00006493246,0.0016747243,0.00023521027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011837673,0.0010012033,0.0018444493,0.0049205725,0.00087723375,0.0028869375,0.0014315459,0.0022413074,0.030157575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037857345,0.00044991737,0.0004978262,0.01814182,0.0010008352,0.002147414,0.0007971856,0.0022463193,0.0067069056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013448923,0.000018194516,0.0002461508,0.0018927569,0.000016378306,0.000023595041,0.000047077865,0.00016255322,0.00004759303,0.0019822328,0.902446,0.09310402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015131686,0.000040726285,0.0029912193,0.0026514295,0.00003680942,0.000060372015,0.00010726601,0.00011895117,0.000041740615,0.0009617501,0.9929611,0.000013608995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056924615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15571938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056924615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050096423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012601604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11318654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226411447","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4027630","title":"Brief of Professor Phil Lord in Opposition to the Proposed Class Action Settlement in Leung v. Uber Canada Inc. et al.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; McGill University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Opposition (politics); Settlement (finance); Law; History; Political science; Computer science; Programming language; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.0134804202130652,"score_gpt":0.2510240882550399,"score_spread":0.23754366804197471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226411447","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016401288,0.005984707,0.0004961877,0.9252623,0.029583246,0.000108675806,0.00019219492,0.000060642913,0.036671914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014094696,0.0022976692,0.00043639928,0.8405796,0.008796194,0.00014115006,0.00007173611,0.00007306097,0.13350955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924785,0.0020986965,0.00038511364,0.0011664002,0.0021785998,0.001692687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99149585,0.005359732,0.0003193529,0.0002175651,0.0016028184,0.0010046513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061974493,0.0009892521,0.0014829173,0.0010877459,0.023384029,0.008450332,0.0041189347,0.0536059,0.013223171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02388436,0.0013205387,0.0016814148,0.0011382131,0.0034721324,0.005673283,0.0031764323,0.06656848,0.0061232597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003831638,0.000029335688,0.00018421195,0.0000556417,0.000013081913,0.0006943827,0.00063934433,0.00006746523,0.00026806924,0.012723639,0.9823646,0.0029219722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045730038,0.000051526404,0.0013371882,0.00020708107,0.000040364393,0.00032700135,0.0024255204,0.00029200412,0.00063980295,0.005243513,0.98931235,0.00007790746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074892506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16796213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9251075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01091117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016726766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1489132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233200862","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n1p145","title":"Investigation and Comparison of Time and Location of Contract Conclusion in Iranian Electronic Commerce Act and UNCITRAL Model Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Credibility; Law; Business; Conflict of laws; Computer science; The Internet; Political science","score_opus":0.020850705823077086,"score_gpt":0.25986534372104086,"score_spread":0.2390146378979638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233200862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9409309,0.00057380286,0.004330397,0.0010522163,0.00008255409,0.00013377033,0.00016716494,0.000021118138,0.052708067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739754,0.00015356527,0.0008095998,0.00005866305,0.000014789432,0.00002710164,0.00008784465,0.0000044616045,0.0014465703],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926644,0.002050342,0.0006715856,0.0005610492,0.0034985195,0.00055404654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697537,0.015349861,0.0066300808,0.00092759123,0.006442841,0.00089588796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060223485,0.00010155398,0.00018829516,0.004659796,0.0015525927,0.0031684027,0.00077148504,0.00066458347,0.0033426082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033650678,0.00012257438,0.00026150676,0.0035289577,0.0033839343,0.0030744576,0.001271995,0.0010414236,0.00024845265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005229756,0.00027703462,0.44518685,0.00032292216,0.0000587097,0.0018018702,0.09135434,0.0020891011,0.001562453,0.30291155,0.0053522848,0.14855978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035482986,0.00034883953,0.76712954,0.00028770877,0.0000931577,0.00096264784,0.14231175,0.009253012,0.0027206687,0.027433032,0.04933933,0.000084798325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015258428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0120655345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015258428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005326182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031866159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038644314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234293901","doi":"10.18356/2dcf8e2b-en-fr","title":"No. 45884. Netherlands and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"United Nations Treaty Series","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.012696637954568676,"score_gpt":0.18708629558027182,"score_spread":0.17438965762570313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234293901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005812476,0.00823323,0.00041492577,0.0031126942,0.0012190556,0.00006217287,0.008838009,0.0002033502,0.97733533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008319568,0.0006391613,0.00008212564,0.00024616192,0.000029288078,0.000014171165,0.0007374761,0.00006298539,0.9973568],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993511,0.000025778563,0.00002584599,0.00014459823,0.00031283236,0.00013989955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931836,0.00007926667,0.00003703964,0.00005246637,0.00042367962,0.000089189256],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005267602,0.00096375257,0.000660192,0.0018272194,0.0038454141,0.0045689126,0.0014270996,0.0025429742,0.343381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016177624,0.0007040395,0.00031041927,0.00459541,0.0007955116,0.0016560291,0.001035984,0.0021180091,0.13471279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029124007,0.000013223037,0.00019784257,0.00009731464,0.0000032602272,0.00004633481,0.00014248233,0.00010160722,0.00018110906,0.022819402,0.9282394,0.048128895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022821728,0.0000016991901,0.0003895235,0.000042346805,0.0000012150758,0.0000126077975,0.000049873557,0.000019903595,0.000051412666,0.00045438248,0.9989712,0.0000035270346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8097303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.930677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.343381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011094943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018352415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93658733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235431986","doi":"10.4018/9781591407898.ch194","title":"Online Petitions to Queensland Parliament","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.030200053930347224,"score_gpt":0.24352919762135258,"score_spread":0.21332914369100536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235431986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106511004,0.00094120984,0.0015644066,0.028347652,0.0021964468,0.00041743254,0.0004192956,0.0004988051,0.8591037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22137164,0.00042534524,0.0012566971,0.008454777,0.00041030775,0.00021509326,0.00027106356,0.00013099049,0.7674641],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941075,0.0014584273,0.00017936918,0.0006717524,0.0020904918,0.001492489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920798,0.0021219447,0.00049867557,0.0009213032,0.0016410259,0.0027372297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040945397,0.0002760863,0.0002545694,0.0013203582,0.015041888,0.005499572,0.0013645797,0.003173752,0.13532583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010711135,0.000530187,0.0005270929,0.001500377,0.0039672097,0.0029312565,0.0066127144,0.0047550327,0.010204531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020415346,0.0006988903,0.012531345,0.00050515047,0.000024089522,0.007538638,0.059546147,0.00089296733,0.0051530018,0.23697327,0.51873,0.15720233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018320563,0.00009757228,0.0085900305,0.00007864948,0.0000040735063,0.00038221624,0.005518428,0.00016221411,0.00034098513,0.0028227014,0.98195964,0.00002532765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07436752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11342309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13532583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009442461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014838276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45271003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235764360","doi":"10.4324/9780203847756","title":"Online Dispute Resolution for Consumers in the European Union","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"KU Leuven; European Commission; Telstra Foundation; University of Pennsylvania; University of Ottawa; L'Oreal USA","keywords":"European union; Dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Political science; Business; Alternative dispute resolution; International trade; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.026125314092107766,"score_gpt":0.24637209371430835,"score_spread":0.22024677962220057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235764360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02749911,0.044340864,0.0038469206,0.05286466,0.0019944422,0.000075377815,0.00005480957,0.000079606034,0.86924416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59581363,0.022939956,0.006557494,0.024016965,0.0013685271,0.00016108197,0.00018430098,0.00008980452,0.34886828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99004656,0.0049566496,0.0004882159,0.00053614966,0.0029173256,0.0010550447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99461997,0.0033841124,0.00042860594,0.0004386719,0.0007390523,0.000389552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012030094,0.00031633707,0.00056511787,0.00112575,0.006991817,0.016790055,0.0013891476,0.01049365,0.015118654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014771439,0.00029207428,0.00049981865,0.002735736,0.005874596,0.011000299,0.0059418017,0.003335268,0.0016174575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029688112,0.000071929935,0.0005193224,0.000112443275,0.0000058362652,0.00035807796,0.014152968,0.00025617206,0.00007299031,0.7910001,0.09613735,0.09728313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001006278,0.0000299496,0.0007196663,0.00070504413,0.000004836253,0.00027281637,0.014947742,0.0003732626,0.00012325397,0.062592536,0.9202037,0.000017143553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003820694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042919903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016790055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006598265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050787646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235935550","doi":"10.1002/alt.20329","title":"Table of Contents","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Appropriation; Confidentiality; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05171031617373013,"score_gpt":0.2476469299778394,"score_spread":0.1959366138041093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235935550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027558283,0.0016625971,0.00097358745,0.005148229,0.009589747,0.0002557568,0.008785757,0.0011291781,0.9721796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017944033,0.0013148789,0.0005239348,0.002005566,0.0021997641,0.000101746235,0.0058435556,0.00045539957,0.98576075],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989812,0.00010076815,0.000060840703,0.00016750314,0.00058100576,0.00010858634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996885,0.00031130153,0.00010353444,0.0003043514,0.001906194,0.00048962975],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060264237,0.0007669934,0.00085613475,0.0023906615,0.0022058568,0.006326178,0.0013704201,0.0018308382,0.8602234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005530867,0.0003930497,0.00065116986,0.0022063535,0.00048653517,0.003068076,0.002298674,0.0022736553,0.78303254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009396591,0.000013322606,0.00006638061,0.000069063695,0.0000011460684,0.000026053021,0.000017994174,0.000035968704,0.00009095306,0.0020109247,0.9692215,0.02843732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002514999,0.000005554688,0.00016286864,0.00007752216,0.000001046917,0.000028268094,0.00003257854,0.00002306143,0.00004651314,0.0005754281,0.99904114,0.0000034828374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064917346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006280372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13977659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026824777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003391841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19937426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236458001","doi":"10.1002/div.7562","title":"Wal‐Mart Stores, Inc.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mergent s Dividend Achievers","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Club; Business; China; Commerce; Geography; Advertising; International market","score_opus":0.03153708726198527,"score_gpt":0.21310922978136004,"score_spread":0.18157214251937476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236458001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014913991,0.00069928047,0.00030472092,0.0008944841,0.0003374378,0.000067199646,0.0039108493,0.0013467381,0.9909479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004338538,0.0006195403,0.00039435268,0.00026890452,0.000056867968,0.000021483114,0.0027766759,0.00008878759,0.9914349],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950624,0.000016706992,0.000017958377,0.000091137816,0.00032885376,0.00003912681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993069,0.000046373614,0.000039997187,0.00007049471,0.00039312828,0.00014312442],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023016191,0.0007768047,0.00031605008,0.0016958453,0.0015489734,0.0033020112,0.0008033997,0.000894827,0.68130547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007895134,0.00037922402,0.00023099338,0.0019804593,0.00023312008,0.0017175963,0.001062931,0.0011957319,0.49757564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005686694,0.00013116913,0.0008212509,0.00009223684,0.0000037604732,0.00009939378,0.000068157664,0.000049128565,0.00059066375,0.0031713631,0.86288726,0.13202862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016215008,0.000029864948,0.0015578393,0.00007120431,0.0000042385464,0.000079370846,0.00008718146,0.00016490718,0.00023438371,0.00065737293,0.9970919,0.000005597123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008844432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022627039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68130547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079449825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015331176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45457906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238596481","doi":"10.1177/0002716208328283","title":"Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Certification; Class (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Action (physics); Law; Public administration; Economics; Mathematics; Physics; Epistemology; State (computer science); Philosophy","score_opus":0.05536266660566329,"score_gpt":0.3410994038705451,"score_spread":0.2857367372648818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238596481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048585497,0.0029741495,0.0009374423,0.010471389,0.00093897956,0.000104941566,0.011565236,0.00047432212,0.96767485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018815609,0.0014882057,0.00088967767,0.0023199979,0.000044014505,0.000020099678,0.0025810152,0.000098614386,0.9737428],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989266,0.00003250517,0.000022228773,0.00019418915,0.0005138481,0.0003105973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981766,0.0000679951,0.00004109212,0.000069620175,0.00124681,0.00039793245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041835778,0.00045857704,0.00040083128,0.0012003747,0.00911396,0.004558225,0.0010633771,0.0014069008,0.26514235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017146155,0.00039047765,0.0004570538,0.0019313737,0.0008534583,0.0008478307,0.0010471785,0.0013805381,0.047543816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007144354,0.000030454039,0.0026985793,0.00013262473,0.000014199919,0.0003062335,0.00022401939,0.00020601843,0.0004199877,0.046115357,0.8920026,0.057778515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009864829,0.0000057280254,0.0026142185,0.000053701115,0.000005593506,0.00006310809,0.00024681885,0.00013318902,0.00020712442,0.0010553125,0.99559265,0.000012635249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9655195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9879881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26514235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029224738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07341506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240571340","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316534205.006","title":"Mediator competence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Accreditation; Competence (human resources); Political science; Law; Alternative dispute resolution; Psychology; Public relations; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01997077206930726,"score_gpt":0.1810625910322636,"score_spread":0.16109181896295635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240571340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035017442,0.001993137,0.010822266,0.012596389,0.0012322495,0.00016254956,0.0002975391,0.00036252645,0.9690316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22558707,0.0052385894,0.016854208,0.014744054,0.00078793894,0.0005102466,0.0017116014,0.0008798495,0.73368645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98423624,0.005429774,0.001249611,0.0018918735,0.004847572,0.0023449801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822107,0.0048351767,0.00090021925,0.0032546574,0.004850054,0.0039492687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012468123,0.00068487396,0.0007844828,0.0018372595,0.0065464806,0.017737245,0.003278184,0.0045265984,0.2049282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042607512,0.00051756046,0.00086854276,0.0016738264,0.0040978855,0.015199922,0.015311133,0.0046276576,0.07171246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006683826,0.00007102226,0.0016713383,0.00041874236,0.000018359045,0.00058840704,0.011876637,0.00015393068,0.00039961288,0.7286805,0.14241786,0.11363668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009849208,0.00002046551,0.00050522457,0.00043421512,0.000008136573,0.00047301408,0.003288599,0.00007472741,0.00023502644,0.039004695,0.9559333,0.00001277124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002977223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003562949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2049282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047174552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011415164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68555313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242871075","doi":"10.1016/s1350-4789(08)70600-7","title":"Intake manifold class action settled","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sealing Technology","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Settlement (finance); Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Manifold (fluid mechanics); Law; Mathematics; Political science; Engineering; Business; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Physics; Finance; Mechanical engineering; Algorithm","score_opus":0.04169770684251272,"score_gpt":0.2523039846293973,"score_spread":0.21060627778688457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242871075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019004313,0.001011507,0.001957854,0.049354073,0.0074034855,0.001054017,0.0015555822,0.0004422286,0.91821694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044745818,0.00032515964,0.0008849226,0.031597394,0.0011194447,0.00040858318,0.0006827654,0.00014431102,0.9200916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795585,0.00094266026,0.0007655523,0.001997172,0.01235071,0.004385379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99109507,0.0016323593,0.0003068028,0.0007879348,0.0054603876,0.0007173178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076617296,0.00095229206,0.0013639508,0.0019581935,0.026662797,0.010839277,0.005600821,0.033437457,0.102451876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022773383,0.0011389679,0.0017578505,0.0018101515,0.0044111037,0.003283275,0.0065622814,0.024356622,0.024483077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011484122,0.000113834976,0.0010305424,0.00007377393,0.000016329832,0.0010664532,0.0023255146,0.0000847105,0.0011280535,0.20538418,0.7715887,0.0170731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004258666,0.000042352847,0.0015546033,0.00010530103,0.000019117722,0.00007411057,0.0011153126,0.00014880247,0.00070944475,0.0030768686,0.9930721,0.000039376424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33556366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45852646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33556366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021145362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03577549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66722095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243107374","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.14058071","title":"Reforming New Zealand's Class Action Procedures to Enhance Efficiency and Improve Access to Justice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Class action; Statute; Political science; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Law; Business; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.018394651804208087,"score_gpt":0.32656514238520723,"score_spread":0.30817049058099916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243107374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1382318,0.0040963474,0.062812485,0.06801883,0.0022754772,0.0031195856,0.00055597426,0.0013293535,0.71956015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55313885,0.0037951542,0.100116774,0.02664586,0.0007093862,0.0014507058,0.00037729403,0.00044990217,0.31331608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785311,0.002807838,0.0017205597,0.0028551754,0.010586811,0.0034984658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836519,0.0035505062,0.0027865586,0.0026540202,0.0057810294,0.0015759935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021060143,0.00061199616,0.00064352463,0.0033167722,0.0066975923,0.008771731,0.0035277524,0.005924848,0.012902332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033496484,0.001018011,0.0015202673,0.0015933417,0.008645293,0.006498168,0.0046612807,0.008291661,0.003095833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015617519,0.00040609675,0.006831754,0.0007883601,0.00008837702,0.0011536978,0.010655943,0.0025554027,0.014337485,0.747909,0.050999954,0.16411772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022335099,0.0004741621,0.041045107,0.00092653616,0.00021032008,0.0007732283,0.0029869473,0.004113148,0.008815505,0.03752343,0.9024491,0.00045913077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34082374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35073185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34082374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020284906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07060301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67767984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244037646","doi":"10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-1315-2016037","title":"Ontario's highest court certifies G20 class action","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Human Rights Documents online","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Law; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Programming language","score_opus":0.0472864981510644,"score_gpt":0.3106702739903772,"score_spread":0.26338377583931283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244037646","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046504702,0.000044111428,0.000028618137,0.00009812987,0.00001662166,0.0000113340475,0.99782026,0.00014194926,0.001373968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011390903,0.000049124323,0.00012353188,0.000037424063,0.000007368082,0.00004231144,0.99611914,0.000031714295,0.0024504152],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985298,0.00012268369,0.00010570782,0.00029883796,0.0005046555,0.0004383145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949609,0.00075116183,0.0005041297,0.00091197994,0.0021658582,0.0007059633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010827606,0.0020395156,0.0011584036,0.005482154,0.0021863854,0.0031894692,0.0029174057,0.0023651854,0.041325253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008020989,0.00091111753,0.0011504879,0.008969541,0.0009949252,0.001062931,0.0016653277,0.001985233,0.04499096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004740353,0.000016032363,0.0020906646,0.00013657002,0.00001193718,0.000020308673,0.000033635686,0.00014672476,0.00003344112,0.00033189094,0.99597794,0.0011534756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022363586,0.000014364814,0.029631546,0.00032658127,0.00004372683,0.000053994656,0.0003059709,0.0010366283,0.00040473367,0.0008656778,0.9670519,0.000041232666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79756063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9056112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20243937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009760523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018217243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4072631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248625235","doi":"10.9785/cri-2017-0605","title":"Canada: Necessity to Globally De-Index Websites of Distributors in Breach of Court Orders","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer Law Review International","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Business; Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.012545109102931854,"score_gpt":0.2647967453828048,"score_spread":0.25225163627987296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248625235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031120736,0.0045931307,0.0049943672,0.43828186,0.0026949784,0.000804076,0.0017757918,0.0014440265,0.51429105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3875039,0.006232854,0.015147578,0.21875887,0.0010876512,0.00039056633,0.0018878244,0.00051582785,0.368475],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97723573,0.0026312172,0.0010866045,0.0010759715,0.012804584,0.005165986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86712956,0.019840127,0.0053680865,0.004687007,0.08511187,0.01786334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01156622,0.00038834292,0.0004897742,0.0036715248,0.0143027045,0.010642158,0.0025812208,0.00847169,0.020995298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05318091,0.0007328113,0.00036931084,0.0035276297,0.00459977,0.0057928246,0.004285216,0.0064533954,0.0067269383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005043919,0.00009974138,0.011611513,0.00019943208,0.00001827316,0.00077755644,0.0029789307,0.00026582083,0.0012656833,0.04163371,0.84067297,0.100425966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055572433,0.00005450988,0.020299526,0.00036437612,0.000036501748,0.00030644785,0.0061662616,0.00061426696,0.0015068075,0.0056633903,0.9648054,0.000126912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90134424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9532747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09865576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030048525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22967237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21801835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251697223","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-68706-1_1312","title":"Matching Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.016988907086965967,"score_gpt":0.21153395769717578,"score_spread":0.19454505061020982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251697223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009860689,0.0006194308,0.0069768163,0.0016973212,0.00017159389,0.000028899361,0.00007766925,0.000047027843,0.9893952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12715812,0.0014009455,0.0049024923,0.003713416,0.00049976574,0.00018773532,0.0002963856,0.000110849425,0.8617303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985208,0.00028897394,0.0000507518,0.0003438927,0.00058774726,0.00020781247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958426,0.00012022781,0.000024716112,0.0001367989,0.00010432999,0.00002964904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010727027,0.000502735,0.000612226,0.001460502,0.002660542,0.0042104786,0.001419268,0.0035758193,0.067891866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033322147,0.0003686155,0.00050817296,0.001152206,0.0042309407,0.005610957,0.0019587546,0.0035298883,0.013737921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021058092,0.000006011033,0.000013046277,0.00000491722,9.252294e-7,0.0000073218303,0.00003221682,0.00003816877,0.000022381972,0.9836609,0.011402707,0.0048094364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050139693,0.000003893211,0.00007597336,0.000025480917,0.0000027928402,0.00004934411,0.000049007762,0.00034641338,0.00011115701,0.8451326,0.15419412,0.000004085977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055884463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050219884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067891866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035091515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020527733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22712094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254930139","doi":"10.1086/697399","title":"Contributors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The China Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Chinese law; Beijing; Politics; Law; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Political science; Civil society; Comparative law; Municipal law","score_opus":0.011533921243546312,"score_gpt":0.22937410303284922,"score_spread":0.2178401817893029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254930139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008331097,0.0016578386,0.0022783014,0.007892051,0.02047801,0.0003629113,0.012414969,0.0020628455,0.95202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002927415,0.0011130294,0.0009817384,0.001833034,0.0016617684,0.00015487059,0.006939352,0.00096679316,0.983422],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795914,0.0002608661,0.0001308762,0.0004381781,0.00095906213,0.0002519089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99404055,0.0005031365,0.00015016118,0.0009730441,0.0031531588,0.0011799783],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016432343,0.0010858492,0.0009109926,0.0035878052,0.003100973,0.008187576,0.0025708128,0.0026574326,0.85424185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0094162,0.00046914414,0.0009551352,0.0033330098,0.0007156173,0.0053294115,0.0046426416,0.0022615143,0.73106796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003241857,0.000022821672,0.00016100655,0.00014238268,0.0000036909216,0.000055358305,0.000117185606,0.000037736972,0.00009924085,0.0073263813,0.9401584,0.051843185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003561965,0.0000054071093,0.00012625752,0.0000603398,0.0000016804044,0.000030613533,0.00007643656,0.000017038234,0.00004488146,0.00092419604,0.9987061,0.0000035663804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030120166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047047404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14575815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024622504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038211187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20790625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283741225","doi":"10.37417/rivitsproc/859","title":"Small Claims and the Pursuit of (Digital) Justice: A Tiered Online Dispute Resolution Perspective","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Ítalo-española de Derecho procesal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Justice Programme; European Commission","keywords":"Economic Justice; Function (biology); Perspective (graphical); Dispute resolution; Law and economics; Political science; Online dispute resolution; Business; Alternative dispute resolution; Procedural justice; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.024872599089838476,"score_gpt":0.24799102953271057,"score_spread":0.2231184304428721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283741225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0922069,0.006877045,0.3870074,0.03070759,0.0004407527,0.00041717812,0.00012863435,0.0004714767,0.4817431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8996626,0.002026797,0.06294423,0.0023863735,0.00029665866,0.00017600715,0.00006706656,0.00012173802,0.032318573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97366536,0.013381521,0.0015384816,0.0023690804,0.0066623343,0.0023832424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9709835,0.01653611,0.0025262358,0.0057211854,0.0027435445,0.0014894133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018395942,0.00045503912,0.00047958858,0.0038474496,0.0059919115,0.027741492,0.00326653,0.0060294284,0.014721094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025085006,0.0005206262,0.0008813735,0.0035674265,0.024296679,0.02285363,0.0124916285,0.004795745,0.0016937259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014873348,0.00003437344,0.0005005636,0.00005432699,0.000005424206,0.00009003389,0.0029390662,0.00093392376,0.00037065207,0.97334087,0.0007409332,0.020975012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027419568,0.00009955881,0.002502041,0.0003748127,0.000023762019,0.00046167691,0.0074212356,0.01122661,0.0015882144,0.83932704,0.13687074,0.00007691233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006318189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004087592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027741492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00931776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063923206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09728819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283770691","doi":"10.31407/ijees12.323","title":"MEGATRENDS FOR E-COMMERCE ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN VIETNAM","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Ecosystems and Ecology Science (IJEES)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"AIDS Committee of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Normative; Business; Government (linguistics); Online dispute resolution; E-commerce; Dispute mechanism; Resolution (logic); Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02009624853475726,"score_gpt":0.2794696766328371,"score_spread":0.25937342809807984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283770691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57669204,0.018763818,0.033486716,0.05246114,0.0008689501,0.0011112271,0.0003631662,0.00011495278,0.316138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96273595,0.0034878524,0.009203501,0.001338661,0.00009096676,0.00017282685,0.00020501629,0.000026794904,0.022738477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905103,0.004255786,0.00073994824,0.0007055769,0.002683502,0.0011047805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989944,0.0047145835,0.0018245755,0.0005355256,0.0015605156,0.0014208028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008176638,0.00014106954,0.00022363738,0.0017781021,0.0059293713,0.009962774,0.0015881895,0.0018228821,0.008555026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009172252,0.00039564137,0.0004059573,0.0026922121,0.0028760077,0.005510421,0.004067956,0.0025652838,0.00050488836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007531393,0.00027740435,0.045200776,0.0008687421,0.00005595885,0.00807892,0.11749431,0.0017331153,0.0013732492,0.628619,0.017138174,0.17908493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000290429,0.00017280967,0.03457011,0.0015150174,0.000034949335,0.004303555,0.31472993,0.009082146,0.0016776648,0.07381852,0.55999714,0.00006909819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019245889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03422881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019245889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006633401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011145607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048128903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285485142","doi":"10.2478/candc-2021-0004","title":"Concession crossover in electronic negotiations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Control and Cybernetics","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Crossover; Process (computing); Work (physics); Point (geometry); Business; Computer science; Microeconomics; Operations research; Knowledge management; Process management; Economics; Political science; Law; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.005871013344132619,"score_gpt":0.21024543416690056,"score_spread":0.20437442082276794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285485142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9176938,0.0014451998,0.049509566,0.0015471578,0.00008846372,0.00026772774,0.0008325708,0.00047215848,0.028143262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99280167,0.000119848286,0.0052491855,0.00006861122,0.000018866607,0.000047820842,0.00040224608,0.000025149253,0.001266753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902469,0.0056657763,0.0005009315,0.0015886759,0.0013813538,0.00061626086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9052069,0.07736211,0.007081232,0.0075093033,0.0014594173,0.0013809858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012102967,0.00035740566,0.0008551361,0.0018460196,0.0019298043,0.004291685,0.0014749469,0.002211822,0.011480507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06767235,0.00044967834,0.0008646803,0.0024961673,0.004251986,0.007694886,0.002996676,0.0027039305,0.0008216673],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027781734,0.0018469793,0.113783725,0.0010881637,0.00029158464,0.003219572,0.015320673,0.2585683,0.004495757,0.3767626,0.010634677,0.21120983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004503793,0.0003804514,0.041947406,0.00027868364,0.00012144255,0.0009621084,0.004994093,0.4699062,0.0051140604,0.4502882,0.02539505,0.00016185352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033215785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018774933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012102967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026078993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008881087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06400734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287455470","doi":"10.5040/9781509951000","title":"What is a Family Justice System For?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Austerity; Economic Justice; Political science; Dispute resolution; Family law; Element (criminal law); Public administration; Law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0373573094691547,"score_gpt":0.23655396316345273,"score_spread":0.19919665369429804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287455470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006233842,0.060056854,0.005522148,0.20893995,0.0054050107,0.000103343176,0.00016166293,0.00019180747,0.71338534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32344344,0.06338279,0.011374099,0.049014892,0.0037999905,0.00035214922,0.0003171567,0.0002688485,0.5480466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807966,0.0008609618,0.0000470666,0.00016347932,0.00039234644,0.0004563494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929106,0.00019666915,0.000061666535,0.000050764513,0.00016765212,0.00023219411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019048713,0.00039840807,0.00038690676,0.0007190994,0.008993177,0.009716338,0.00074933434,0.002892462,0.0117586395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003254964,0.00022927878,0.0003172746,0.00089042395,0.006576886,0.00940642,0.0016573393,0.0031289419,0.0027317721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011853419,0.000016419093,0.0005128174,0.0001234042,0.0000058365245,0.00027900815,0.014009992,0.00012456138,0.000098522636,0.6765883,0.23027013,0.077959105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002434515,0.000010954624,0.00065513625,0.00039691065,0.0000022967613,0.00022111808,0.0054361103,0.00006120717,0.000033833614,0.062044505,0.9311236,0.000011888251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028188638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026829429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028188638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005685972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009872833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056049168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300923741","doi":"10.36615/9781776405657-09","title":"Online dispute resolution: A Ferrari pulled by donkeys?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"UJ Press eBooks","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Political science; Dispute resolution; Corporate governance; Constitutional court; Alternative dispute resolution; Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.04232735888543382,"score_gpt":0.23313701028909797,"score_spread":0.19080965140366415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300923741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044404985,0.019171057,0.009705853,0.055792872,0.0028448,0.00007668788,0.00006129264,0.00011887713,0.90778816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17875329,0.019930264,0.0064220233,0.02049689,0.0014336237,0.00018393133,0.000084029714,0.00032980798,0.7723661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965642,0.0017604824,0.0001358973,0.00046590142,0.0006461305,0.00042738477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972421,0.0017631868,0.00010955547,0.00039550767,0.0003195739,0.00017011122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004208226,0.0006564457,0.00056963635,0.0016088462,0.006785175,0.01606387,0.0016864849,0.00409082,0.040942557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007682779,0.0004902049,0.00046284532,0.0021693842,0.012299176,0.02745551,0.006243143,0.0055275843,0.011263237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008834113,0.0000116707415,0.0000719656,0.00005485218,0.0000015415586,0.00005120036,0.0037568924,0.000045771525,0.000048793656,0.9288881,0.045201443,0.021858955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005891755,0.000013792298,0.00010871921,0.0003174468,0.0000037773818,0.00019385952,0.00462507,0.00021106483,0.00014005015,0.09628233,0.89808965,0.0000084586945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0094156405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014273934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040942557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006518882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050864806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13696647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309698580","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/dhmx4","title":"Regulation relevant to (long-form) audio-recordings collected in South Korea","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nautical Research Society","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.02091944904047792,"score_gpt":0.2428174518535358,"score_spread":0.22189800281305788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309698580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5360101,0.0034802812,0.071255155,0.011232102,0.0011628951,0.0017005146,0.0061023054,0.0006749552,0.36838186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9196357,0.0014822999,0.017988442,0.0032871114,0.00032063923,0.001092945,0.0018680466,0.00021987941,0.054104906],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98878366,0.0038993915,0.0011555977,0.0018103537,0.0034820435,0.0008689047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98185873,0.0075021368,0.0031576653,0.0028985443,0.004246089,0.00033682448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062779943,0.00030076774,0.00024459916,0.0007577344,0.0021012062,0.0040385593,0.0008759638,0.0019122233,0.009886986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014538447,0.00023526611,0.00027336413,0.001795503,0.0024098079,0.0014443377,0.002239276,0.0018631003,0.0032127912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002694161,0.00056431844,0.06727132,0.0029476935,0.00023557372,0.0099642305,0.10088435,0.0038581602,0.21856405,0.11502,0.0643224,0.4136738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020549241,0.0005618828,0.24207921,0.0020293968,0.00021396502,0.0037805699,0.057430364,0.0023851772,0.06535861,0.016625263,0.60896754,0.00036252112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074083693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011884359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009886986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017520606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002391632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033201575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312407096","doi":"10.51952/9781529210019.fm002","title":"Preface","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Bristol University Press eBooks","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.028465322425206864,"score_gpt":0.1837672055142615,"score_spread":0.15530188308905465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312407096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010254184,0.0055776723,0.0028493027,0.012313462,0.027695943,0.0002143623,0.004245301,0.000527774,0.9455508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004940961,0.0027647903,0.0012171466,0.0024842485,0.004025592,0.0001373126,0.0029181852,0.00034733515,0.98116446],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994579,0.00008917015,0.000033037257,0.00010692308,0.00026077323,0.000052205254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982828,0.00038288158,0.00007842727,0.0001788789,0.0008178515,0.00025926591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008095148,0.0006420222,0.00047169116,0.0020663638,0.0023945188,0.0033873902,0.0010461306,0.0011488944,0.42921692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004366093,0.00026163022,0.00030996208,0.0019683253,0.0007665042,0.003045099,0.001900238,0.0028366053,0.23579285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013996223,0.000016386088,0.0000864243,0.00008117263,6.923728e-7,0.000053404907,0.00030363875,0.0000390223,0.00010650482,0.015348619,0.94804186,0.03590828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.60044e-7,0.000004692357,0.00015670626,0.000060562055,2.4277378e-7,0.0000385073,0.00012017401,0.0000111009895,0.000025886424,0.0015236433,0.99805605,0.0000015756538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037606177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051429546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42921692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020271759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014012901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312441055","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4227329","title":"Open Courts, Privacy and Equality in a Digital Era: The Supreme Court of Canada’s 2021 Open Court Jurisprudence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.016817203835090683,"score_gpt":0.25978699214250545,"score_spread":0.24296978830741475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312441055","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07054679,0.011946571,0.005656151,0.45691392,0.0018138172,0.00018522826,0.000791983,0.000097561715,0.45204794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7276211,0.0029046747,0.00382246,0.14305578,0.0009416793,0.00016619089,0.00015728142,0.00014808204,0.121182814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837698,0.002241549,0.00042889206,0.0018963523,0.006049424,0.0056141163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833582,0.008509305,0.00041051043,0.0006837911,0.0041924966,0.0028457732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010837048,0.0006080701,0.0010352451,0.0022624312,0.04376434,0.028019575,0.0047413055,0.02989033,0.008995353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025787937,0.0009577533,0.0010587419,0.0034566377,0.0328976,0.007488484,0.0069116564,0.027726075,0.0005321621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021261509,0.000022644266,0.0007404645,0.00002294147,0.000013444987,0.00016232194,0.00465925,0.0002426158,0.000098933066,0.9535749,0.035823822,0.0046174284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018036395,0.000030163837,0.006737562,0.00073818146,0.0001372359,0.00015247668,0.012259333,0.0026139515,0.0007242073,0.45624596,0.51986253,0.00031803432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9834447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9907832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1065207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1065207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23318514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77286536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313355810","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4309068","title":"St(D)reaming Resolution: Crowd Based Stepped Online Dispute Resolution for Professional Gamers, Vtubers, and Streamers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Resolution (logic); Psychology; Engineering; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.011741851290224453,"score_gpt":0.2450405107774559,"score_spread":0.23329865948723144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313355810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41223007,0.00029010326,0.33041653,0.004191488,0.001408222,0.002525215,0.0016823482,0.014685919,0.23257016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7953856,0.00008481025,0.14499886,0.00055867864,0.00018286843,0.0005459761,0.0010683883,0.0004224939,0.056752276],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742943,0.0010577351,0.00010930344,0.00037211293,0.0006632871,0.00036822673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936639,0.0031171758,0.00029994032,0.0010629093,0.00081116793,0.0010448756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004471917,0.0005905632,0.000553787,0.0011633204,0.003252428,0.0038115506,0.0019892012,0.0026452749,0.055054087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009849832,0.0003251806,0.000480471,0.0006310284,0.0010688524,0.0037673782,0.0056670215,0.001479895,0.00857693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004122985,0.0044423663,0.0096164625,0.00037162256,0.000121393394,0.001667919,0.010346537,0.0352453,0.012951939,0.05208297,0.13365726,0.73537326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012756697,0.0025011078,0.00881631,0.00022627035,0.00012620882,0.00097284216,0.017573679,0.6311523,0.016554454,0.08469081,0.23582113,0.0002892818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005101626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009254218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055054087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006685064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002213262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18417424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319863569","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4322764","title":"Judicial Notice and the Internet","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; The Internet; Political science; Law; Business; Internet privacy; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.008907113399956163,"score_gpt":0.2184347371501088,"score_spread":0.20952762375015263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319863569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006537748,0.008224012,0.0014762148,0.042206787,0.0011301091,0.000019410085,0.00016707544,0.000058053345,0.9401806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5643554,0.010365422,0.0015222844,0.02389438,0.008656468,0.00009780055,0.000341676,0.0001807329,0.39058587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946518,0.0016670383,0.00020564524,0.0008115373,0.0018742855,0.00078973715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99023235,0.006499978,0.0007244745,0.0011403107,0.00090113224,0.00050173455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004103034,0.00029453955,0.0005401156,0.0037492588,0.0061075976,0.016556872,0.0014629505,0.0107392445,0.07649123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022856303,0.000421874,0.0005240004,0.0035002222,0.0071351505,0.010946354,0.003665225,0.0073368787,0.00669888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022722279,0.000029755007,0.00018040465,0.000018553204,0.0000038359394,0.00006818099,0.0002969467,0.000088643996,0.00006097534,0.9484157,0.03744094,0.013373412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004436135,0.000026387908,0.0014131181,0.00018448356,0.000018359397,0.00011174352,0.00072861026,0.00050210545,0.00019353267,0.5206796,0.47607335,0.000024419074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011442576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016365217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07649123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044259126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003104758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2558887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320002596","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4336547","title":"For Justice, Not Profit: Public Funding of Collective Redress","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Economic Justice; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.051927086643404,"score_gpt":0.28707527196492566,"score_spread":0.23514818532152165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320002596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06988952,0.0032937306,0.006619064,0.13246499,0.0014571248,0.00013553219,0.0001907366,0.00020742821,0.7857419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8620889,0.0011951255,0.0010230647,0.0066279266,0.0013347893,0.00015753128,0.00009508169,0.000093038885,0.12738451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878199,0.004069343,0.00026799968,0.0006546572,0.0030397247,0.004148401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97856164,0.01243809,0.0016493064,0.0027795099,0.0028965422,0.0016750332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014397362,0.00037947064,0.000610622,0.0020990488,0.008239327,0.013678402,0.001640251,0.0105735855,0.037524305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047365937,0.00054460764,0.00051130203,0.002479809,0.004912046,0.0068040863,0.008229802,0.0059534675,0.0027896066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016446458,0.00012624954,0.0019170577,0.00008839911,0.000034528988,0.00014182465,0.003258401,0.0005300477,0.00013342661,0.87563264,0.07130859,0.046664417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026328885,0.00015620282,0.012032239,0.0008123772,0.00018233818,0.0002630364,0.011815448,0.0035487202,0.00094188965,0.44162276,0.52828,0.00008162923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016824458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032015197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037524305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008395112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02140168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12553132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323661029","doi":"10.33137/ic.v15i.40370","title":"Cross-Cultural Mediation: Practice Issues for Lawyers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Italian Canadiana","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.03264986742093366,"score_gpt":0.33378898086439646,"score_spread":0.3011391134434628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323661029","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029950343,0.011194526,0.004021706,0.759969,0.0010916663,0.000100412566,0.000050000363,0.00007892567,0.19354336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8548593,0.0066764574,0.009352504,0.085979246,0.0010723552,0.00043455412,0.00006213648,0.00014348426,0.041419964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9472259,0.03802331,0.0008329917,0.0018283066,0.004754006,0.0073355366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83752644,0.119576514,0.0028613815,0.007337735,0.0188012,0.013896697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07650832,0.0005743656,0.0010738274,0.0031091294,0.041713588,0.032455914,0.008051055,0.019481534,0.04284104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12564196,0.00073512644,0.00077971484,0.005471324,0.031460743,0.017237276,0.015083003,0.013733275,0.0028148969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089159534,0.00036123442,0.0062578013,0.00035823925,0.000039548766,0.0009474068,0.16307168,0.00026603832,0.000172107,0.6346602,0.096256495,0.09752013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007843426,0.00007188094,0.0058426703,0.0026512104,0.00004404562,0.00091132446,0.5846132,0.00046322908,0.0002917487,0.15477428,0.2501569,0.000100980295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2744184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47779867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2744184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026495812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09476567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54564226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378231385","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v16n2p45","title":"A Case Study of Subject Identification and Immunity in the Pre-Litigation Procedure of Shareholder Representative in China","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Identification (biology); Legislature; Judicial interpretation; Subject (documents); China; Business; Legal practice; Judicial review; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Accounting; Law; Corporate governance; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.03572385683796194,"score_gpt":0.3130314291027196,"score_spread":0.27730757226475766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378231385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9591148,0.0005138529,0.005639078,0.0038200058,0.00007423375,0.00026107542,0.000035376914,0.000026908257,0.03051463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98578644,0.00030810566,0.0022567357,0.00055131124,0.000049644328,0.00008138591,0.000026234524,0.000011749332,0.010928427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850567,0.006248009,0.00090822723,0.0014687297,0.0032734964,0.0030447736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98936427,0.0063501657,0.0012835518,0.00089229783,0.0011545352,0.0009551911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015470145,0.00046376433,0.00065869495,0.0023933162,0.018737506,0.0040493966,0.0027481434,0.006608146,0.0049529113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017925233,0.000566476,0.0007106853,0.00294321,0.007818488,0.0040448643,0.0044953506,0.004755717,0.00036106957],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003185511,0.0009613605,0.1238577,0.0003996086,0.00009948041,0.14053255,0.2734493,0.0035171446,0.00572987,0.36512163,0.00972981,0.07628306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034567053,0.0012251135,0.16759634,0.0011532097,0.0005771836,0.042866997,0.37795442,0.037811875,0.022479445,0.10297014,0.24444304,0.000576571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03804207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057924606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03804207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010378319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01085964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081814945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379046468","doi":"10.4337/9781849806305.00040","title":"Index","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vlaamse regering","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.016791180123359756,"score_gpt":0.23277168519459887,"score_spread":0.21598050507123912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379046468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006232592,0.0018404964,0.00024166683,0.0020341733,0.0021835999,0.00016320184,0.020936629,0.00044948334,0.97152746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025480313,0.0013653354,0.00020607014,0.00050607056,0.00037886997,0.00008736709,0.010497327,0.00015729734,0.98425364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994648,0.000043057335,0.000033894146,0.00008690276,0.00027989218,0.000091566755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998985,0.000073827054,0.000051164167,0.00009930897,0.0005408764,0.00024979303],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003665492,0.00078147475,0.00052988564,0.003728102,0.0020160337,0.0054730964,0.0011681858,0.0011294247,0.73253495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024797148,0.00028801436,0.00029867602,0.0053181727,0.00038241074,0.0033123344,0.002397537,0.0010484153,0.5074713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010309721,0.000010175246,0.0002359067,0.0000983789,0.0000010381126,0.000022421342,0.00007798281,0.000021788077,0.000050611714,0.0034259323,0.94638604,0.04965948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015951975,0.0000036881206,0.0007674918,0.000059850096,4.6777444e-7,0.000022205104,0.00010623408,0.000012180337,0.000022294009,0.00040167276,0.99860066,0.0000017184229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019995362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023721777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26746505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023565667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025869124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381051241","doi":"10.35774/app2023.01.194","title":"Abroad experience of electronic jurisdiction","year":2023,"lang":"cs","type":"article","venue":"Aktual’ni problemi pravoznavstva","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Economic Justice; Legislature; Political science; Civil procedure; China; Business; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Engineering management; Public relations; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.0158807372867358,"score_gpt":0.27617507105517286,"score_spread":0.2602943337684371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381051241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90025043,0.0009658436,0.0009089613,0.005217989,0.00015972748,0.000020164916,0.000041088755,0.000029912067,0.09240592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809935,0.00054818747,0.00012972635,0.00075319124,0.000036707206,0.000009635354,0.000030880576,0.0000176314,0.0174806],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955935,0.0025089616,0.00014158548,0.00023677936,0.0006450777,0.0008741404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964128,0.0015826669,0.0005881366,0.00026325585,0.0002902533,0.0008628798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002828944,0.00022116721,0.00036473415,0.00092049735,0.0071465974,0.006975987,0.0007455809,0.0015535044,0.021191457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00852839,0.00023121639,0.00024913083,0.0013040035,0.0045384644,0.0058520907,0.008132794,0.0037276098,0.0013917212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001363558,0.0007491227,0.0266578,0.00018429171,0.000024968112,0.008807383,0.7962201,0.0004904541,0.0010306746,0.08950811,0.011722007,0.064468734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017312519,0.0003627967,0.013553066,0.00025456143,0.00001634786,0.006311561,0.7458166,0.0004336083,0.00086507516,0.003931399,0.22838515,0.00005247409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033743766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038170423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021191457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00165019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015228267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07089245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385207772","doi":"","title":"TURNING THE SPOTLIGHT ON CLASS REPRESENTATIVES -EMPIRICAL INSIGHTS FROM DOWN UNDER","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Political science; Genealogy; Computer science; History; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2738981605630917,"score_gpt":0.5283124431815234,"score_spread":0.2544142826184317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385207772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8478429,0.0031507893,0.0005168285,0.012983974,0.00009720184,0.00010294061,0.00031997616,0.000008795523,0.13497664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98258716,0.0011827918,0.000073556854,0.0013408826,0.000050987026,0.000029699313,0.00013405431,0.000012861502,0.014587996],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99317425,0.0016976158,0.00018466791,0.0007996952,0.001713235,0.0024305785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780709,0.00951561,0.0052462914,0.00088501157,0.0035392782,0.0027428973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005078567,0.00025574368,0.00062613806,0.0029880123,0.013548926,0.007989091,0.0014836369,0.0016797683,0.016778952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023627998,0.0003733238,0.0002548132,0.0035292965,0.009103244,0.0058924817,0.003528874,0.0033523873,0.0010968596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015691022,0.0003358828,0.24544178,0.00019101538,0.0000344832,0.0009929524,0.56367636,0.00010717383,0.00035682507,0.124859616,0.019325148,0.044521905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001945652,0.00006165369,0.34461123,0.0006807928,0.000040237257,0.000117245785,0.52312297,0.00015546504,0.0003093791,0.0039817877,0.12686585,0.00003395854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65924835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.743779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65924835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020051531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012004075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68551683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385509225","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3743","title":"Class Actions in Canada: The Promise and Reality of Access to Justice by Jasminka Kalajdzic","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Class action; Pillar; Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering; Philosophy; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.04598115688036698,"score_gpt":0.26556164774820407,"score_spread":0.2195804908678371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385509225","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023583261,0.07017356,0.0009356591,0.6473811,0.0030646885,0.000047731148,0.00043598172,0.00006217655,0.25431576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63768804,0.09760192,0.0021104962,0.09183714,0.0018118501,0.00007316994,0.00023538034,0.00013915014,0.16850293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430215,0.000568274,0.00011716533,0.0004521781,0.0029516523,0.0016086523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935597,0.0015791799,0.00026077783,0.00016528867,0.0025637033,0.0018713118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025810662,0.00037244044,0.000612566,0.0014927349,0.030438555,0.015398699,0.0018636032,0.005655898,0.0067938115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007299989,0.0006506407,0.00034337168,0.0029966473,0.017831352,0.004060361,0.003455925,0.01105995,0.0005898235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003115674,0.000028792472,0.0017841794,0.00012312486,0.00001608824,0.0005193449,0.012356357,0.000519335,0.0001771477,0.5808004,0.37326565,0.030378494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016131762,0.000009264151,0.005550024,0.00047587432,0.000017398916,0.00015768435,0.012953227,0.0005374214,0.00018343011,0.038081974,0.9418765,0.00014110075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17437552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17437552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24809653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9576074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387134583","doi":"10.59962/9780774869102-001","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.025616769899377372,"score_gpt":0.18248505106746207,"score_spread":0.1568682811680847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387134583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053045773,0.0064529404,0.014469071,0.13798974,0.07671352,0.0014299287,0.052161295,0.0041605663,0.7013184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03188267,0.0035215362,0.01381359,0.051140465,0.0055927723,0.0014388387,0.027553339,0.0022288326,0.862828],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518615,0.00096470024,0.00026384633,0.0008545809,0.002215376,0.00051538786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850424,0.0012644328,0.00039644708,0.00096291734,0.009595169,0.0027387007],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043737795,0.0010565363,0.0008299692,0.0016660842,0.003305698,0.0049412246,0.0024835807,0.0019769452,0.43586984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020427829,0.00035595763,0.000595131,0.0012960216,0.0007322703,0.0024309151,0.004978737,0.0032063962,0.26673526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048288883,0.000016475735,0.0005328452,0.00012954301,0.000004554612,0.00014057403,0.00040387738,0.00004034187,0.0002046101,0.005556085,0.96005726,0.032865413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008003906,0.00000856318,0.0003423357,0.00012980642,0.0000040382843,0.0001463908,0.0004929392,0.00004063467,0.00009417582,0.0013377381,0.997389,0.000006477132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064895237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012015584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5641302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003485282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008430431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8046632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387149697","doi":"10.4337/9781783470440.00030","title":"Index","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01889551837754434,"score_gpt":0.23374648217229702,"score_spread":0.2148509637947527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387149697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002186979,0.0005327789,0.0009619712,0.0014258582,0.0028962984,0.00015858968,0.0051424135,0.00079815,0.9878654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009232122,0.00046133454,0.0005185571,0.00071724784,0.0004699578,0.000094433155,0.0029541634,0.0002493298,0.99361175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901485,0.00009487281,0.000058553993,0.00015561299,0.0005613488,0.00011459977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840194,0.00020137134,0.000058547765,0.00025866975,0.0007455585,0.0003339566],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007536397,0.000938264,0.0008685647,0.002589974,0.0020145194,0.0072239246,0.0018617184,0.002092023,0.8560915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003830709,0.0004356069,0.00065097347,0.0028618046,0.00047903866,0.004459518,0.0030742865,0.0018913704,0.7626038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021180636,0.000032852924,0.00013304407,0.000099857265,0.0000021542774,0.000037211164,0.000042483232,0.00005264111,0.00014640126,0.009825917,0.8975657,0.092040665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028749057,0.000006605435,0.00016730584,0.000042060943,7.321357e-7,0.000021376723,0.000032960754,0.000025581197,0.0000386843,0.0012509322,0.998408,0.0000029190678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004220403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006070239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1439085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018452115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023108984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387934653","doi":"10.4337/9781803920887.00021","title":"Platform responsibility in the Digital Services Act: constitutionalising, regulating and governing private ordering","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Blueprint; Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Business; Corporate governance; Public administration; Dispute resolution; Process (computing); Public relations; Political science; Law; Engineering; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.027908764218002965,"score_gpt":0.22684234788541693,"score_spread":0.19893358366741398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387934653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011446667,0.008747472,0.020032441,0.020004788,0.00058576197,0.000054186417,0.000055466015,0.00008751748,0.9389857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56259656,0.013482776,0.010590284,0.0058784797,0.0011921197,0.0002670529,0.00012334484,0.00018489978,0.40568447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958621,0.0012705609,0.00013521098,0.0002582638,0.0020245335,0.00044927894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998629,0.0008394202,0.0000850904,0.0002049536,0.00014171655,0.00009987754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030972518,0.00037869602,0.00021875165,0.0010127346,0.004014539,0.012151955,0.0008124324,0.0036159751,0.0043612784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048360378,0.00031240575,0.00027327475,0.0019313103,0.01949904,0.008257563,0.004216771,0.00390906,0.0015261119],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016947357,0.000003886213,0.000027366466,0.000007772689,3.6702295e-7,0.000017572997,0.0010500443,0.00011349124,0.0000314984,0.9910653,0.0034500097,0.0042309286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004994044,0.000010159926,0.00026219132,0.00015589906,0.0000032462822,0.00007002665,0.0016820026,0.0004707596,0.00034296524,0.5918448,0.40513906,0.000013874978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017062055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017001001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017062055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007020104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012301192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050934613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388121548","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198298960.003.0014","title":"Class Actions In The Common Law Provinces Of Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Class (philosophy); Law; Geography; Common law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02627769694860877,"score_gpt":0.22343562116417937,"score_spread":0.1971579242155706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388121548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03922933,0.012135081,0.00055815885,0.007855224,0.00022755536,0.000054898766,0.0017904565,0.00008909572,0.9380602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58239937,0.009548974,0.0010282606,0.0019439775,0.00006148717,0.00003884958,0.001121897,0.00007014458,0.403787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987696,0.000049472856,0.000023142173,0.00009247948,0.00055665674,0.00050873857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869055,0.00015772675,0.000064048465,0.000041500476,0.0007108631,0.00033531134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003889485,0.00025303138,0.00020340834,0.0026894328,0.013418284,0.005716481,0.0011383226,0.0010470324,0.01551837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013960686,0.00035681634,0.00024738046,0.0056403065,0.0030453699,0.0010135884,0.0011459739,0.001795527,0.0010082436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029738127,0.00003256198,0.005838331,0.00014303626,0.000010086903,0.00034131823,0.0155835785,0.0009779659,0.00023026712,0.65482724,0.23515941,0.08682649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009639596,0.000005104199,0.018756773,0.00024304661,0.000011642485,0.000061998544,0.005805775,0.00038153658,0.00014925863,0.008943006,0.96559894,0.00003321532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86697537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13302463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18286271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9651658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388247926","doi":"10.59224/bjlti.v1i2.108-153","title":"Adhesion Electronic Contracts (“shrink-wrap” and “click-wrap”) and the terms of use (“browse-wrap”)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brazilian Journal of Law Technology and Innovation","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Business; Advertising; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.01586237613384797,"score_gpt":0.24408337943149994,"score_spread":0.22822100329765196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388247926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15130536,0.006089911,0.08364597,0.007315793,0.00048153795,0.00021955522,0.00021360986,0.00010143164,0.7506269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9442205,0.0021281326,0.012715437,0.0013425997,0.00018834593,0.00026508904,0.0001243596,0.000086996355,0.03892854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917578,0.0034550293,0.0004203487,0.0006610529,0.0031016287,0.0006041648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991791,0.00445561,0.0012899549,0.0013622469,0.000871991,0.00022926855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040708915,0.00035952718,0.00024221666,0.0025167502,0.0036746173,0.0071288194,0.00079433026,0.0021489912,0.005407772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0136956675,0.00021775442,0.0003553622,0.0035385014,0.018701464,0.0067628613,0.0043755737,0.0021460392,0.0007323411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008770917,0.000008607246,0.000946372,0.000039994386,0.000002013849,0.000094572366,0.0079965675,0.000051218234,0.00023231024,0.9773761,0.0012950294,0.011948401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013707165,0.00007844538,0.011031183,0.001203458,0.000033817087,0.0019139438,0.034119118,0.0017411581,0.0028853219,0.48382118,0.46309286,0.00006592352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005864921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005175029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071288194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026610887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003088592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021529198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388469709","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4597917","title":"JudicialTech supporting Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015531034346555006,"score_gpt":0.2697904852370098,"score_spread":0.2542594508904548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388469709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00243538,0.004348039,0.0004729107,0.09294953,0.008007972,0.000046658104,0.00036141617,0.00023014046,0.8911479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04983668,0.0021083208,0.0004704977,0.048224587,0.0044071507,0.00007653431,0.00025533998,0.00018374568,0.8944373],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956338,0.0007146605,0.00018218074,0.0007167714,0.001613358,0.0011392531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936871,0.0028284988,0.00024998587,0.0008067796,0.0013533584,0.0010743134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037585672,0.0005586487,0.0008207463,0.0017902564,0.011847029,0.01646874,0.0019812032,0.01945472,0.18424685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017874368,0.0006609361,0.00062743435,0.001232833,0.0026113049,0.0041802963,0.0044909273,0.0118828695,0.051591393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030588508,0.000054417385,0.00025995247,0.000067393594,0.00000669622,0.00019594996,0.0002293764,0.000050999304,0.00020078915,0.20587824,0.7701709,0.022854695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023707533,0.000016485907,0.0004986186,0.0001368328,0.000010777318,0.00005359579,0.00032516546,0.00013809564,0.00030865226,0.030634288,0.9678419,0.000011928084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01103087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0378454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18424685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040426943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009468206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6163671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389493132","doi":"10.5771/9783748917359","title":"Der Rückgang der Eingangszahlen bei den Zivilgerichten","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Fell; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economic Justice; Law; Christian ministry; Period (music); Geography; Cartography; Arbitration; Art","score_opus":0.027285974923969218,"score_gpt":0.24953153818762075,"score_spread":0.22224556326365152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389493132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21609905,0.17209464,0.0056805057,0.014034341,0.0022093167,0.00007948168,0.004536969,0.00073666545,0.58452904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53205,0.102611534,0.005034526,0.0014350936,0.0007555625,0.000051376897,0.003584887,0.00033591985,0.35414106],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985258,0.00020493183,0.00010639361,0.00017206375,0.0007390133,0.00025190582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998743,0.0006496499,0.00030648592,0.0000939455,0.000093265364,0.000113696515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010008472,0.000317888,0.00026572184,0.0024729313,0.0007567363,0.0035296986,0.00054259936,0.0008243097,0.029317522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035355217,0.00028235072,0.00023137912,0.0040514315,0.00095532177,0.0023377647,0.0012459435,0.0009987701,0.011075664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012521603,0.000052299252,0.013404989,0.00042041173,0.000020593712,0.00020595767,0.002401297,0.00067051733,0.00086658413,0.032130573,0.13415654,0.815545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013210069,0.000114035116,0.06085245,0.00063341274,0.00004472524,0.0012810832,0.0020065818,0.0009037604,0.0017801301,0.008817936,0.9235164,0.000036341567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076593407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021729441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029317522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012733204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011077098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09807688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390927614","doi":"10.1515/9780776624303-015","title":"CHAPTER X Cyberjustice and Ethical Perspectives of Procedural Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.01990179431378491,"score_gpt":0.20732465167129285,"score_spread":0.18742285735750794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390927614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070458264,0.034430604,0.008458041,0.14141695,0.0013572815,0.000056144978,0.00004892524,0.00003275651,0.8071535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75983053,0.027321031,0.005637175,0.047169738,0.006203249,0.00034239472,0.000064242464,0.00011360181,0.15331806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99268603,0.0040965364,0.0001597219,0.0006294692,0.001546765,0.00088135374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541014,0.003351157,0.00037478688,0.0002623001,0.0003756989,0.00022591745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00498524,0.0006866349,0.00046451448,0.0016932501,0.008351276,0.015302539,0.0016611392,0.0116362395,0.007679391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057480307,0.00036521084,0.00068337144,0.0013182536,0.061933998,0.008771386,0.0037482188,0.010470652,0.0008823625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.271648e-7,0.0000035960566,0.000021264024,0.000010056289,5.919435e-7,0.00001820733,0.0005769282,0.00004310528,0.000008027993,0.99671197,0.001931467,0.00067402696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005820017,0.000008145144,0.00017393309,0.00034757121,0.0000031145833,0.00007537974,0.0022035516,0.00031672505,0.00004828087,0.88919586,0.10761322,0.000008395272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011802015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010931057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015302539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014248208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010613469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103378475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391621943","doi":"10.3126/jbm.v7i02.62590","title":"Key Factors Influencing Adoption of Online Dispute Resolution in Banking Sector: An Empirical Analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business and Management","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Key (lock); Dispute resolution; Industrial organization; Marketing; Political science; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.03804544388524723,"score_gpt":0.2846667960757014,"score_spread":0.24662135219045417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391621943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983607,0.00008800532,0.00016394851,0.00014875471,0.000003731933,0.000116160496,0.00010701349,0.0000023112023,0.0010094158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984384,0.00022924111,0.00048214901,0.000056522098,0.000006860395,0.00013226779,0.00016672604,0.000002783206,0.00048495719],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546343,0.001683928,0.000688744,0.0003627092,0.0010305521,0.00077062764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95220804,0.026653133,0.011707092,0.0013015659,0.005027435,0.003102732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063230144,0.00038588457,0.000575898,0.0023668716,0.0016037334,0.0030418655,0.0010196854,0.001172192,0.006377422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028489318,0.0005730669,0.0010936263,0.0032324537,0.00108104,0.0022885033,0.0017351989,0.002165114,0.0007488925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006496587,0.0008223613,0.9776458,0.00011040449,0.00003934807,0.00021656035,0.011088568,0.00008217322,0.000092648705,0.00025288406,0.00026398545,0.009320188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010386888,0.0002639648,0.9412612,0.00017937686,0.0000670423,0.0002242679,0.055287227,0.0015809751,0.00012913722,0.00016469842,0.00081312004,0.000018578274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005877234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006049477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006377422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013555269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036986698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033439696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391693535","doi":"10.55905/revconv.17n.2-048","title":"Teaching appropriate conflict resolution methods as an incentive to de-judicialization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contribuciones a las Ciencias Sociales","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Conflict resolution; Resolution (logic); Political science; Computer science; Economics; Law; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05596491858053373,"score_gpt":0.3690178225435621,"score_spread":0.3130529039630284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391693535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0782195,0.030230017,0.35755444,0.062096775,0.0021064512,0.00097983,0.000044190474,0.0003926559,0.46837607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8339915,0.01486019,0.12465322,0.0041357744,0.0010295099,0.0004232127,0.000035120232,0.00013414082,0.020737369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97222364,0.01934057,0.0010773408,0.0012647931,0.0051587615,0.0009348511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96891963,0.021978784,0.0040170727,0.0023032078,0.0018685319,0.0009127151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017128162,0.00050282414,0.00047175592,0.0024975769,0.0038451839,0.007893624,0.0025790683,0.002821667,0.0048040478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023053411,0.00034600447,0.0004611724,0.0015120072,0.01678604,0.00665165,0.0053869253,0.0052095014,0.00082430535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014563829,0.00021141247,0.00097211305,0.00078374386,0.000016587855,0.0001862649,0.021275619,0.00082932593,0.0013196707,0.85949355,0.0040859333,0.11081128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060421688,0.00016023083,0.0041595157,0.0021858383,0.000034141023,0.0006852479,0.021274045,0.0031409801,0.0031655577,0.58916646,0.37588984,0.00007770368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009637723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026308042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017128162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004763437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0085101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09058344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392415851","doi":"10.5958/2277-4912.2023.00007.3","title":"Analysis of alternative dispute resolution techniques: Apparent future of legal dispute","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INROADS- An International Journal of Jaipur National University","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Dispute mechanism; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.019561352783404175,"score_gpt":0.27140508068054847,"score_spread":0.2518437278971443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392415851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08241887,0.016522368,0.41865078,0.027162319,0.00058065075,0.000263601,0.0001331689,0.00013476088,0.45413345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8650818,0.0053137895,0.1032234,0.0005065776,0.00043935256,0.0002259141,0.00008312311,0.00006578778,0.025060326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867953,0.0065777274,0.00043685135,0.00094799703,0.004673226,0.0005689032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834976,0.009829223,0.0014955746,0.0018684615,0.0029131344,0.0003961063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013415223,0.0004043296,0.00048585603,0.0048168106,0.003799235,0.011404385,0.0024391771,0.0024221798,0.007915941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020055005,0.0002894607,0.0009418161,0.0042608357,0.01294897,0.015800007,0.0032289035,0.0032729108,0.00087035337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008014576,0.0000096466665,0.00022696577,0.000035439956,0.0000025558393,0.000039805724,0.0011958249,0.00029365142,0.00006198766,0.9855247,0.00040415942,0.01219721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010435144,0.000025940333,0.00073613774,0.00014247671,0.000010307592,0.00024358313,0.002763646,0.012745584,0.00034077268,0.9172736,0.06568932,0.000018234601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013068451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013479565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013415223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005925837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034280543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07094729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392419760","doi":"10.7202/1109099ar","title":"A FORMAÇÃO E A CERTIFICAÇÃO DE MEDIADORES EM PORTUGAL: UM MODELO ADAPTADO À NOVA ERA DIGITAL","year":2024,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Nova (rocket); Engineering","score_opus":0.028276462978371823,"score_gpt":0.2616488113852,"score_spread":0.2333723484068282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392419760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13328154,0.0027104493,0.116067804,0.023246037,0.0005384638,0.00041315152,0.0006746208,0.00057043025,0.72249746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8963892,0.0018475661,0.035570703,0.00067107665,0.00016914595,0.00019360322,0.00026954795,0.0001501288,0.06473897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952679,0.0019846896,0.00027621895,0.00081133255,0.0010831037,0.0005767063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98990345,0.0038448682,0.0012613998,0.0018343215,0.0016835041,0.0014725883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006163346,0.000665866,0.00044842734,0.0030631067,0.0042140028,0.016060472,0.0023661375,0.0048468327,0.0115638655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013394829,0.0008163821,0.0011707469,0.0027850815,0.006368867,0.012957207,0.0054354845,0.002164531,0.0025315774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001050527,0.00018812786,0.009686242,0.00026418836,0.000024166637,0.00072451873,0.017063377,0.007885365,0.0006946179,0.91594887,0.005234588,0.042180873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014152772,0.00037901793,0.02564806,0.0017777669,0.00012806026,0.0015972164,0.02585714,0.07480063,0.0019217092,0.39003202,0.4774888,0.0002280685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029169284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024171468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029169284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01067091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009445819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077423275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392419853","doi":"10.7202/1109096ar","title":"CONFLICT TRANSFORMATION THROUGH DIGITAL MEDIATION: A STUDY OF BRAZIL'S JUDICIARY COURTS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Transformation (genetics); Political science; Conflict transformation; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.014868049140132471,"score_gpt":0.26941136416445516,"score_spread":0.2545433150243227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392419853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821441,0.00038848325,0.00039247036,0.0018905925,0.000013146592,0.00007507929,0.000027889684,0.0000049804944,0.015063247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973283,0.0003374503,0.0002169392,0.00037533563,0.0000073001193,0.000032420525,0.000011593811,0.0000051111356,0.0016856288],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969132,0.0017915809,0.00012264473,0.00029935397,0.0003627832,0.0005104065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99484223,0.0027582645,0.0009801899,0.0002882165,0.0003267553,0.00080440426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003531794,0.00024830183,0.00059068366,0.0014893281,0.010775949,0.007426763,0.0014687617,0.0017270682,0.0041873846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011401122,0.0005156516,0.0002645759,0.0022589637,0.0075917454,0.004007641,0.0051604235,0.0025554663,0.0003695019],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014064929,0.00025425426,0.015236442,0.000096788564,0.000007230145,0.001735455,0.9608731,0.00006487284,0.0005710586,0.009962089,0.00058763905,0.010597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001100065,0.0000852506,0.01978086,0.00020305908,0.0000092887685,0.0005787702,0.9554393,0.0003002971,0.00019316367,0.0017426576,0.021638386,0.000018062214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05940293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14610693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05940293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067686774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071706227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11811435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019924","doi":"10.7202/1105760ar","title":"Deceptive Design and Ongoing Consent in Privacy Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Privacy law; Law; Information privacy; Psychology; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Privacy policy","score_opus":0.048726572700979916,"score_gpt":0.2843932778620251,"score_spread":0.2356667051610452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03791133,0.085224286,0.114247635,0.21961705,0.0019438902,0.00045394409,0.00018112389,0.00014457888,0.5402761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.901755,0.02919494,0.020055275,0.0233921,0.0015174709,0.00050262857,0.000060599465,0.000071018425,0.023451079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92648494,0.046189774,0.0042221216,0.004756648,0.014216501,0.0041300296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9131784,0.07066214,0.004008221,0.006288581,0.0047673606,0.0010952778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047593728,0.000552874,0.00088626833,0.0029730955,0.0081094215,0.015994115,0.0027478547,0.012035673,0.0031606965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061062783,0.0007279696,0.0011510492,0.0034477306,0.11146817,0.0181989,0.0056723547,0.012814414,0.00051222736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029972005,0.000004922489,0.0000831003,0.00003215869,0.0000014062502,0.000028866887,0.0009381888,0.00011499853,0.000019367231,0.9956558,0.00056791375,0.0025503044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001778566,0.000027656528,0.000409557,0.00047389843,0.000009508002,0.000088031775,0.0011131448,0.0004280354,0.00018550873,0.9449144,0.052301537,0.000030874984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03821062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030279567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047593728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021421783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031984404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25170273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393542334","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4063985","title":"AILA 2019 Precedent &amp; Statute Retrieval Task","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Task (project management); Information retrieval; Computer science; Chemistry; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.038674865876686074,"score_gpt":0.2499966107189358,"score_spread":0.21132174484224975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393542334","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062768706,0.0014085331,0.00092772546,0.0013074321,0.0005503694,0.00036129027,0.9717953,0.0051560807,0.012216449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034775324,0.00013263636,0.0021074798,0.00028389195,0.000046721423,0.00023925553,0.9896853,0.0001233832,0.0039039056],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748445,0.00040062235,0.000341633,0.0006661406,0.00071840786,0.00038863716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688244,0.0009302839,0.00017799181,0.00064496585,0.0010228953,0.00034142224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022788253,0.003250575,0.0018336846,0.0057103024,0.0026338452,0.003768107,0.0047305594,0.005760211,0.071844675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010491259,0.00058546045,0.0027588883,0.0041683596,0.00072688714,0.0037131102,0.003390961,0.0038315712,0.1103292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001550588,0.0001353318,0.0010460622,0.0005136478,0.000033523713,0.00018305221,0.000039386385,0.00038470826,0.0003466886,0.0005182741,0.98682344,0.009820882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000581511,0.0001636265,0.008398099,0.0006323274,0.00009614492,0.0007148214,0.0006940225,0.009444736,0.002440171,0.0032324255,0.9734954,0.00010683375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07250777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.123560466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07250777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042419317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050500697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24034435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031027","doi":"10.29173/alr2736","title":"Federalism and the Arbitration of Consumer and Employment Disputes in the United States and Canada: The Road Not Taken?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Arbitration; Political science; Law; Compulsory arbitration; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.022546395160782124,"score_gpt":0.2461806803774138,"score_spread":0.22363428521663167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20774174,0.029517401,0.004219551,0.20753624,0.00077516923,0.00010405081,0.0002560337,0.00007129115,0.5497786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95977795,0.0065418244,0.0013948865,0.011519234,0.00012901213,0.000030301055,0.00007816433,0.000031817104,0.020496797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887229,0.0015203881,0.00025636176,0.00062704075,0.003857509,0.005015781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923954,0.002311695,0.00059575634,0.00029993072,0.003211369,0.0011858927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00544682,0.00024192355,0.00059296197,0.002242902,0.026141971,0.014183664,0.002158234,0.004741632,0.0049074823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017374605,0.0004314528,0.00082251645,0.0037657446,0.02140085,0.0041403295,0.005150123,0.0069475453,0.00025565445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025396734,0.000018580844,0.003528174,0.00004699714,0.000027559037,0.00021557661,0.010391402,0.00064761273,0.00010480976,0.95440495,0.013653276,0.016935738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009271258,0.000036324327,0.06721224,0.0013788396,0.00019270182,0.0003984107,0.06927151,0.0045496873,0.0007967344,0.3746607,0.48103434,0.00037590123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99287283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99540293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15149842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15149842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25661793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9841416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686737","doi":"10.29173/mlj1265","title":"Collaborative Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.013629411706465498,"score_gpt":0.2269172645056525,"score_spread":0.213287852799187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011265941,0.000797836,0.0045724814,0.008454446,0.00044806066,0.0000478621,0.000087790926,0.00011968944,0.98434526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09242339,0.0011811923,0.0033522919,0.0061012963,0.0006511963,0.00017847799,0.00021488617,0.00017032551,0.8957269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590516,0.00089559157,0.00013692689,0.0008241564,0.0016660108,0.00057213934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938414,0.001299678,0.00026803583,0.0016753264,0.0018895303,0.0010260259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040006675,0.00061305193,0.0005126211,0.0020846277,0.012327069,0.016320167,0.0023096907,0.0059290538,0.119167306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009103527,0.0006303005,0.00051350624,0.0025319625,0.010335266,0.008732129,0.006330676,0.005737731,0.021080904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025343002,0.000011425041,0.00009363007,0.000011211093,0.0000024826245,0.000024555422,0.0005608383,0.000041568943,0.00003203086,0.9323803,0.05920211,0.007637202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009666172,0.0000061126207,0.00029814226,0.00007819328,0.0000063120233,0.00006310848,0.0007707217,0.00025870968,0.00011019178,0.20724654,0.79114264,0.000009679973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09902835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119167306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00994388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020754207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39865434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396713365","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4817383","title":"Windfalls or Just Rewards: Class Action Fee Ratios in Ontario","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Business; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03180146537819842,"score_gpt":0.2697428513500958,"score_spread":0.23794138597189737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396713365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9447914,0.0009055389,0.00023954507,0.0085157,0.000053348234,0.000067392,0.0022535033,0.0000269901,0.04314657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98056006,0.0003183732,0.00012428084,0.0002979643,0.000016401935,0.000017908622,0.00026977528,0.000020811049,0.018374456],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959467,0.00052191183,0.00022006831,0.00031202222,0.0015241876,0.0014750907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98275983,0.0040116063,0.0036688042,0.00045135108,0.0045853187,0.004523101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025353502,0.00014171386,0.00041707596,0.001979017,0.004889079,0.0031927624,0.0017780843,0.0011695247,0.010629418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017666835,0.0004757627,0.00036329764,0.004927738,0.0018487717,0.001378337,0.0017702956,0.0016403026,0.00054161856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006643792,0.00020755881,0.8533688,0.00012679602,0.00006246618,0.0005868684,0.022055047,0.0012944794,0.00037822512,0.02992062,0.03478096,0.056553718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043544,0.00004105846,0.95449513,0.00005667721,0.000027253895,0.000101442114,0.019377148,0.001429415,0.0001694632,0.0010975043,0.023118703,0.000042617197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99386156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100589864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100589864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.086326934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72983396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396998585","doi":"10.56159/chn.2024.a920962","title":"Understanding Public Perceptions of Chinese Law and the Legal System: Legal Experiences Matter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"China An International Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Perception; Political science; Legal profession; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Legal psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.029118217560336775,"score_gpt":0.2772677949471609,"score_spread":0.24814957738682414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396998585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99198145,0.000121996934,0.000060562026,0.0015138008,0.000011693407,0.0000068600143,0.000020009631,0.0000017429597,0.0062819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99928856,0.000099480225,0.000013742646,0.0002000433,0.0000065369295,0.0000029737114,0.000015246506,9.37525e-7,0.0003725229],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979444,0.0006757824,0.00009488583,0.00013632438,0.00054115977,0.00060732744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99476045,0.001821234,0.0013962254,0.00023803189,0.00087453664,0.00090944365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004022895,0.00024661605,0.00028925214,0.0014281967,0.004054966,0.0038299684,0.00050598895,0.0010183293,0.0042425236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007160395,0.00019255586,0.00022433935,0.001594026,0.0059135435,0.0033993335,0.0020171076,0.0014232857,0.00019637747],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053260635,0.000093711235,0.19796921,0.00007980605,0.000025779831,0.0005823373,0.78180194,0.00007592094,0.00085844024,0.007096023,0.0014919214,0.009871587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008614568,0.00006655417,0.16260582,0.00010970907,0.000016770846,0.00012882915,0.8276564,0.000346885,0.00024423684,0.0012566195,0.0075266915,0.00003278122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07370696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06918799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07370696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005338291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036976929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14655584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173142","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-59940-8_7","title":"Gender Implications and the Community Practice of Dispute Resolution","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.045789143125964014,"score_gpt":0.2713324973253375,"score_spread":0.22554335419937346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008709685,0.006526448,0.0023726008,0.031385373,0.00056232343,0.00003633066,0.000019032519,0.000013757696,0.95037454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7143106,0.0044311853,0.002225639,0.0065292735,0.00067559705,0.0001811788,0.000031659933,0.000085358486,0.2715295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99233043,0.005264824,0.000079403915,0.00040478806,0.0010118746,0.00090869836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99318963,0.0053490563,0.00021972756,0.00029541392,0.0004206604,0.0005254327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007310283,0.00042094765,0.0004767399,0.0013890371,0.014906762,0.011702895,0.0020918497,0.006072055,0.029174855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014331075,0.0002667608,0.0002374088,0.001928407,0.03656902,0.0064879255,0.0049069584,0.0051391334,0.0012635593],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042504194,0.000009328046,0.00005667918,0.000013138041,6.619248e-7,0.00004371073,0.012378585,0.00002850818,0.000012616453,0.97421455,0.007848916,0.005389048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001581759,0.000014033974,0.0004906773,0.00023361725,0.0000030622557,0.00012353768,0.035325013,0.00017579357,0.000071530114,0.6716533,0.29188573,0.000008017592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02271854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053411193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029174855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065618805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008199154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097599626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400453000","doi":"10.1136/bmjebm-2024-sdc.198","title":"199 A Theory analysis of shared decision-making theories, conceptual models, and theoretical frameworks within dental healthcare","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Conceptual framework; Computer science; Management science; Knowledge management; Data science; Epistemology; Engineering; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014584936867220889,"score_gpt":0.28231046301039275,"score_spread":0.26772552614317185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400453000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1530975,0.050459452,0.32831448,0.12194935,0.0013485656,0.0045021083,0.0020775176,0.00022438214,0.3380266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88644975,0.0111412,0.09182715,0.004079527,0.00014776718,0.0028125206,0.00080104097,0.000026257356,0.0027147264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97501975,0.01865015,0.0011774701,0.0012497967,0.0032465197,0.0006563256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541691,0.038954016,0.0022621844,0.0013465483,0.0025138776,0.00075433945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024388399,0.0009150578,0.0009583146,0.010253382,0.003253597,0.009280434,0.0029310891,0.0026547168,0.007198987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028653326,0.0004929573,0.0017180216,0.012211842,0.017375525,0.012433688,0.0047961683,0.003205692,0.00057000073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002144489,0.000102989485,0.0022356056,0.0027443625,0.00008259865,0.00015758298,0.021084232,0.0014847843,0.000063530264,0.93290716,0.0035706179,0.035545126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007410303,0.000098767254,0.0021186853,0.009498618,0.00014234154,0.0002334175,0.055819258,0.0061772824,0.00021094292,0.8775316,0.04804671,0.00004828833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056369114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044611017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024388399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014869285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023750875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12897974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400520869","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4885768","title":"Managing Mass Tort Class Actions: Judicial Politics and Rulemaking in Three Acts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rulemaking; Mass tort; Politics; Class action; Political science; Law; Tort; Class (philosophy); Judicial activism; Law and economics; Sociology; State (computer science); Computer science; Liability","score_opus":0.01618570183423328,"score_gpt":0.2583719968081085,"score_spread":0.24218629497387523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400520869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44902384,0.0012857494,0.021714356,0.036313143,0.000346083,0.00027631855,0.000096719996,0.0000650471,0.49087873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809027,0.00015527304,0.0019065307,0.0011021533,0.00007164346,0.00007535005,0.000012234421,0.000020533322,0.015753673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98708874,0.0052641234,0.00047831412,0.0011132337,0.002220622,0.0038348953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776338,0.016557101,0.0018774915,0.0011225842,0.0012850525,0.001524032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01635409,0.0003772743,0.00051832944,0.0016746736,0.02193118,0.022672411,0.0025603275,0.009777314,0.008924449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029313873,0.00048863643,0.00052645523,0.00165114,0.015471715,0.0058841724,0.0064905477,0.00955883,0.0008283775],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008801273,0.00013394983,0.0024441408,0.00002730939,0.000015105961,0.00035001468,0.020184444,0.0010081346,0.00048257853,0.95492125,0.006019999,0.014324991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001300809,0.00018297294,0.018043647,0.00033086873,0.00013666348,0.00034579966,0.08611683,0.010219607,0.0038308909,0.7137417,0.16674346,0.0001775389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024230074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05041624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024230074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008970448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011548435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08648968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400573686","doi":"","title":"Le développement du recours aux modes amiables en matière civile : étude comparée entre la France, les Etats-Unis et le Canada","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.0194591850053721,"score_gpt":0.2485551731790122,"score_spread":0.2290959881736401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400573686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8322087,0.0032699606,0.0031843865,0.0020728905,0.000062960535,0.00007548746,0.00023660886,0.000052544983,0.1588365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9502409,0.0017475176,0.0018932635,0.00007974282,0.00003126552,0.000034362434,0.00006591686,0.000031937867,0.045875154],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960377,0.0011760027,0.000078216566,0.0003393598,0.0016758996,0.0006927764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962387,0.0013806804,0.0006717703,0.00020151764,0.0009087588,0.00059863477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003225161,0.00039095068,0.0002467127,0.0033274544,0.0059607606,0.010077307,0.0010813825,0.0013169057,0.008916898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061907247,0.0002917609,0.0005146676,0.0037099996,0.0060851714,0.0042044153,0.00239059,0.0020398486,0.0010293924],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011946262,0.0002578518,0.13210666,0.00019617134,0.00005946834,0.0016170284,0.37753552,0.0013604173,0.002165966,0.25143343,0.0053789257,0.22776908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020691426,0.00021766445,0.3227659,0.00038919272,0.00004779648,0.0020581002,0.24651413,0.0019310567,0.002002789,0.007659005,0.41630358,0.00009014497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45443824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5402685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5455618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022982452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009819933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9035862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400881146","doi":"10.7202/1112508ar","title":"Mediator Liability 23 Years Later: The “Three C’s” of Case Law, Codes, &amp; Custom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediator; Liability; Law; Business; Political science; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.03205114993770327,"score_gpt":0.27947457692898076,"score_spread":0.24742342699127748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400881146","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008960285,0.092641085,0.0046689343,0.62691104,0.021989608,0.00019175682,0.0006713427,0.00008242082,0.24388346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24671923,0.023508467,0.0034717089,0.36212474,0.0059916424,0.00033181548,0.00038709844,0.00020552447,0.35725978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811064,0.003920501,0.0011503963,0.0028314786,0.0073302495,0.0036609168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881053,0.004632622,0.00079760264,0.0013626835,0.0037640652,0.0013377434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015850917,0.00060055585,0.000733919,0.0014483926,0.011390019,0.016884768,0.0029018095,0.03149274,0.01015291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034178697,0.00087743776,0.0017652377,0.0016238426,0.026080495,0.017465692,0.0069614444,0.0318004,0.0027324348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046044588,0.000027518612,0.00046491818,0.00005945302,0.00001347905,0.0005686729,0.0033378743,0.00008255817,0.00021249946,0.7778942,0.20255092,0.014741859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028423212,0.000025256972,0.0017002093,0.00043783474,0.000021785621,0.00041120255,0.001564162,0.00007384552,0.0003355957,0.058220692,0.9370959,0.00008503937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35751966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4320952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35751966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03889066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051902868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7108773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402548180","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idae018","title":"Arbitration in cross-border data protection disputes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0320758617540472,"score_gpt":0.3671973468882235,"score_spread":0.3351214851341763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402548180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086208746,0.009974926,0.23470357,0.075130366,0.0016861527,0.0010460403,0.00019029592,0.00019240745,0.5908675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9267134,0.00257378,0.029833544,0.0062922514,0.00069873844,0.0010133164,0.00013067342,0.00010061314,0.032643676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.86413234,0.08730304,0.010901446,0.011444409,0.01713982,0.009078987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8623814,0.10979753,0.0077460622,0.010434809,0.007517291,0.0021229049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11033738,0.0008256906,0.001944844,0.004248636,0.021261469,0.02513875,0.007237069,0.022614157,0.015734503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16982381,0.0011750371,0.0024121683,0.004840145,0.04017647,0.029083716,0.030751847,0.01345623,0.0019767624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001652217,0.000012903212,0.00029498187,0.000060051112,0.000009964594,0.00046131897,0.0077022277,0.00034082064,0.00007937065,0.9848379,0.0013521137,0.004831867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048963357,0.0000270984,0.00032191275,0.00062179886,0.00003175853,0.00047845527,0.0074540684,0.003172729,0.0004016464,0.90523607,0.08215133,0.00005412777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049211117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00299403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11033738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009379932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0123662595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5835268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402571542","doi":"10.1109/snpd61259.2024.10673950","title":"Tracing Economic Vibrancy: AI-Driven Analysis of Geographic Clustering in Legal Businesses","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Algoma University","funders":"Algoma University","keywords":"Tracing; Cluster analysis; Computer science; Economic geography; Data science; Business; Regional science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Geography; Programming language","score_opus":0.010287187438758106,"score_gpt":0.2412138647417038,"score_spread":0.2309266773029457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402571542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5747984,0.00022686228,0.4143624,0.0013168814,0.000026538877,0.00025452126,0.0008921514,0.00043497843,0.0076872883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8979141,0.00007540174,0.10024062,0.00004237438,0.000011478992,0.00007593574,0.00061427563,0.000032801458,0.0009931511],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988637,0.0005297015,0.000073842166,0.00016004746,0.00029070678,0.00008214296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908688,0.006238046,0.0009787122,0.00062331255,0.0010596435,0.000231421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023224233,0.00025606892,0.00030291622,0.0040619234,0.0006786246,0.0025311655,0.0009878343,0.00056716055,0.0013283797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014256032,0.00019838082,0.00047861013,0.00348261,0.0009098124,0.0015661444,0.0012205557,0.0006845656,0.00020755392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018740915,0.00030353785,0.17914176,0.00021825024,0.00014560489,0.0006172853,0.0050826413,0.53451467,0.0037038126,0.09135622,0.003122061,0.18160675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040627274,0.000011419473,0.015733607,0.000015779851,0.000006070055,0.00005319512,0.0011361385,0.95792615,0.0005510809,0.02336846,0.0011797607,0.0000142041345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02129463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018603466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02129463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016496488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010961535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04234135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402624404","doi":"10.37239/0869-4400-2024-21-8-197-207","title":"Class Litigation in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zakon","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.009436601947725052,"score_gpt":0.1956400527447319,"score_spread":0.18620345079700684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402624404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16750826,0.031791184,0.0019755047,0.13748854,0.0022382585,0.00019202118,0.001063128,0.00018332961,0.65755975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8489832,0.011993362,0.0008936498,0.0179917,0.00032549535,0.000052614414,0.0003361654,0.00007768879,0.119346105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911849,0.00053033273,0.00022939911,0.0006243926,0.0028449178,0.0045860684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928301,0.00146912,0.00067517,0.00023812232,0.0023513273,0.0024360702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020656649,0.00033896248,0.00047244737,0.0027662853,0.036767337,0.0117314635,0.0023453583,0.005952708,0.017940626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008389263,0.00041285498,0.00059557986,0.005532575,0.009344826,0.0024253502,0.0053067124,0.0057576117,0.0008330894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005045937,0.000072992436,0.011420139,0.00024453076,0.00003486094,0.0021519253,0.022678852,0.00065776263,0.00043425313,0.71287036,0.17094673,0.07843716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024312469,0.000023409673,0.027468259,0.00036369872,0.000042096723,0.00054859236,0.021531297,0.0007026588,0.00039503828,0.015972907,0.93280864,0.00011907284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99234504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18032493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18032493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28551713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9507069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403418907","doi":"10.58445/rars.1739","title":"Walmart","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.023178597116851326,"score_gpt":0.24800249655891646,"score_spread":0.22482389944206513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403418907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020095177,0.001583317,0.0029919634,0.0029977898,0.0028720764,0.00018382471,0.005089841,0.00879078,0.97348094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0051902253,0.0014575955,0.0019278886,0.0014764299,0.0005688639,0.00007186204,0.0070471372,0.0010669958,0.98119307],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988219,0.000060763632,0.000042259388,0.00023293658,0.00068861013,0.00015352416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983191,0.00009008417,0.00007035112,0.00015637757,0.00093524146,0.00042873883],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007734726,0.001221136,0.00057559344,0.0023134933,0.0020378693,0.005854924,0.001872831,0.0018081382,0.68832463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019221114,0.0005399089,0.0005961694,0.0017168942,0.0003977595,0.003261372,0.0025106957,0.0018944507,0.5470616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006679201,0.0000877053,0.00048184447,0.000104309474,0.000006861308,0.00010847102,0.00008091666,0.00007466423,0.0005670741,0.005390377,0.8865779,0.106453046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006088851,0.000015201724,0.0003605522,0.00002895828,0.0000028859045,0.00007770967,0.00004696629,0.00008061038,0.00015018381,0.00052911555,0.99869555,0.000006336405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045826654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077997646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31167537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011457889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020105105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404223801","doi":"10.34120/jol.v45i5.3123","title":"حق المتهم فـي محاكمة سريعة فـي القانون الأمريكي","year":2024,"lang":"ar","type":"article","venue":"مجلة الحقوق.","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.015028315647099376,"score_gpt":0.23866796054122055,"score_spread":0.22363964489412116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404223801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027863667,0.003873918,0.0009652421,0.021514049,0.003891402,0.0001313258,0.00072075165,0.00016051445,0.96595633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04100308,0.005016546,0.0019693847,0.017983384,0.0019177669,0.00025488323,0.000877466,0.0002935507,0.9306839],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956814,0.0005056853,0.00022579698,0.0006465464,0.0022617944,0.00067874213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669814,0.0008158885,0.00020925912,0.00022138515,0.0017696352,0.00028577517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018689487,0.00059700495,0.00029864357,0.0014674495,0.0048960387,0.0068394816,0.001094838,0.004516676,0.17989734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007818863,0.00054288487,0.00047936803,0.0014776826,0.0019677298,0.0022615488,0.0018445723,0.005519543,0.11682707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007132399,0.0000756117,0.001263699,0.00028271697,0.000012407699,0.00048144598,0.0014812257,0.000102397884,0.0013817344,0.10007641,0.8364778,0.058293294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005330813,0.000011391189,0.0016751536,0.00014232329,0.00000569544,0.00011552365,0.00081127597,0.000051512467,0.00053186005,0.0038826067,0.99275476,0.000012537936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021660758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04014888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17989734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004650298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005399333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60181653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404366632","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v14n6p180","title":"Cultural Factors Influencing Interest Contention of China’s Business Dispute Settlement: A Discourse Information Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); China; Settlement (finance); Business; Law and economics; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Law; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.019884432794919447,"score_gpt":0.2934716492980251,"score_spread":0.27358721650310563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404366632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93956506,0.00085571245,0.002404824,0.0038266852,0.000051548657,0.00008394203,0.000053953798,0.000009826588,0.05314859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874383,0.00016935414,0.0002910028,0.00006171651,0.000011304708,0.000014104038,0.000017000117,0.0000024140556,0.0006891955],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954058,0.0021186478,0.00034289868,0.000337918,0.0012054251,0.00058923464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99149525,0.005515013,0.0013094709,0.00023321976,0.001052985,0.0003939822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005092302,0.0004215592,0.00033565736,0.004531995,0.0067814444,0.0075690774,0.0010634263,0.0009435343,0.0029058356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011624142,0.00024996357,0.00029770544,0.004293274,0.008222403,0.0050786035,0.0033669232,0.0013570447,0.00009460504],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000767174,0.00012115782,0.054430213,0.00030132764,0.000041434392,0.0024985503,0.7472338,0.00068365573,0.0018619836,0.15696575,0.0015757527,0.03420973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003670543,0.00006689086,0.09870162,0.00044012943,0.000098286735,0.00039883648,0.8227326,0.0060209217,0.0020477918,0.031425297,0.037935857,0.00009507444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038208805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0322955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038208805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012616197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009145812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09153736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406923364","doi":"10.3138/tjt-2024-0036","title":"Whither By-laws: Association Regulations, Then and Now","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.007589688814183392,"score_gpt":0.2340520826298419,"score_spread":0.2264623938156585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406923364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03307142,0.014969453,0.007534288,0.25544745,0.0055300477,0.00006557024,0.00036187022,0.0002973059,0.6827226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49110267,0.005643254,0.004094325,0.041092224,0.0012252101,0.00007270128,0.00026690587,0.00015243965,0.4563502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934143,0.0011863973,0.00027027677,0.0009509561,0.0028721043,0.0013059383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949386,0.0009195237,0.00044742713,0.000859644,0.0021649888,0.0006698401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048564835,0.00023767243,0.00024992425,0.0007312469,0.00927262,0.008344348,0.0010258831,0.0033402976,0.011866359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008458267,0.0002420163,0.00021379703,0.0013181192,0.018597618,0.005260625,0.0022568721,0.0053968625,0.002339182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001670898,0.00001307367,0.0013483535,0.000045033605,0.0000043878135,0.00006702122,0.008984974,0.000055185174,0.00028036677,0.88344425,0.07604606,0.029694695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040879654,0.00000730205,0.0023188305,0.00006941762,0.0000046907708,0.000053838834,0.002556779,0.000030959058,0.00016931185,0.02086614,0.9739041,0.000014437021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43796754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46846238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43796754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017540073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021725439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87083656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407705738","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdaf010","title":"Arbitration with Uninformed Consumers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Economics; Microeconomics; Law and economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028582721129087323,"score_gpt":0.29512672789089356,"score_spread":0.26654400676180623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407705738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7865122,0.023306206,0.0483765,0.014774151,0.00025632302,0.00042018938,0.00038424518,0.000053918968,0.12591615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910631,0.0026336485,0.0016775185,0.0007278543,0.0001238388,0.00006709372,0.00008333736,0.000005710504,0.0036179097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97933096,0.014294829,0.0010148763,0.0012602354,0.0031220857,0.0009770093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87187284,0.09608232,0.021830207,0.0063306144,0.003205835,0.0006781479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021981439,0.0002690058,0.000849081,0.000992762,0.0010931279,0.0031958488,0.00091319386,0.0024179744,0.014143123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078151375,0.00033594485,0.00086997106,0.0014022887,0.0023355514,0.0033566838,0.0019015236,0.002067005,0.0011841181],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018697613,0.0011454436,0.17703354,0.0020746307,0.0008386744,0.0020708581,0.0037679987,0.017068833,0.0012472044,0.5014117,0.010314121,0.2811573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012054212,0.001036053,0.097185746,0.002202388,0.001143795,0.0026165629,0.005587649,0.06431897,0.00636827,0.7255378,0.09262403,0.00017339567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012072496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012805734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021981439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013421561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012443686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116250336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409603315","doi":"10.61091/jcmcc127b-073","title":"Research on the Design of Multi-Objective Decision Optimization Model and Legal Suitability in Environmental Legal Dispute Resolution","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Management science; Business; Computer science; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.035642915769521166,"score_gpt":0.2973269665559142,"score_spread":0.261684050786393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409603315","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01834712,0.0012460044,0.9708147,0.000639356,0.000095145995,0.00013421499,0.000056760873,0.00008034746,0.008586446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8126835,0.0035464896,0.17509589,0.00022898284,0.00014984357,0.0008302124,0.00027254643,0.000061776416,0.0071307165],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846894,0.00064761855,0.00009702848,0.00026963744,0.00033493942,0.0001818155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885595,0.00069119735,0.000116606905,0.000031067353,0.00023521033,0.0000700095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025745255,0.0011973082,0.0015103768,0.001016982,0.0010585503,0.0028619736,0.0017003022,0.0016899019,0.0034079477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003568452,0.0007179466,0.0016807138,0.0014345169,0.00092535006,0.0028368456,0.001431625,0.0020413655,0.00024320293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024029761,0.000054795975,0.0008151852,0.0001891739,0.00005781132,0.000084695836,0.0000920981,0.9540845,0.00034588523,0.026000472,0.00078480534,0.017466469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000078183575,0.000020285408,0.00011558789,0.00001234175,0.000013988544,0.000010135901,0.000026035083,0.99430954,0.00008799,0.004876623,0.0005138857,0.000005672981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0113274325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060482416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0113274325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021796664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030386844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022523046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409787835","doi":"10.61091/jcmcc127a-473","title":"The Rise of Online Litigation Based on Time Proof Consensus Algorithms Challenges the Traditional Trial Model in the Framework of the Code of Civil Procedure","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Computer science; Civil procedure; Algorithm; Proof of concept; Model checking; Consensus algorithm; Programming language; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02808257967090761,"score_gpt":0.26324802095261063,"score_spread":0.23516544128170302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409787835","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040567998,0.0009684243,0.9217781,0.004514768,0.00026458147,0.00018553279,0.00007169324,0.0002246084,0.031424418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85718817,0.0012796003,0.1269129,0.00061763026,0.00037139026,0.000263552,0.00010601811,0.00013847744,0.013122308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874429,0.005410975,0.0006083206,0.0018047707,0.00399921,0.00073378376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9578155,0.028363654,0.00379527,0.0056341547,0.0033804527,0.0010109226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008560326,0.00045344522,0.0012376691,0.0018729655,0.0021436326,0.0048924577,0.002789133,0.0028588576,0.008999622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038052283,0.00037571625,0.0013163277,0.0021320211,0.0054054363,0.012318148,0.0033927246,0.0040658913,0.0011386517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007436499,0.000079461555,0.0013794817,0.00015076579,0.0000468685,0.00019662947,0.00031154693,0.05865722,0.0009849614,0.8710466,0.0028064665,0.064265646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040478753,0.00011344494,0.00055145053,0.00006419452,0.000025047662,0.00027464572,0.00023837206,0.33625135,0.0014014434,0.6516305,0.009363767,0.00004526411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022439267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014507379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008999622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025918446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004268881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045271873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410090280","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1712","title":"Volume 69 Index","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Index (typography); Political science; Computer science; Thermodynamics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.016417245645898686,"score_gpt":0.23911616869422578,"score_spread":0.22269892304832709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410090280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002596852,0.0019844172,0.00022437605,0.0025234702,0.008392669,0.0001367494,0.0026927425,0.00052781275,0.9832582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000925731,0.0011875012,0.00010834746,0.0010401779,0.0034462912,0.000056390705,0.001325126,0.00026210127,0.9916483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837214,0.000110970796,0.00008371771,0.0002771492,0.000979886,0.00017628523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972899,0.00032351623,0.00014906624,0.00031968005,0.0013309629,0.0005869094],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007171596,0.001755322,0.0014503718,0.0061017047,0.0026762064,0.010954239,0.0013026163,0.0020344732,0.786994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045669004,0.0005823969,0.00076107593,0.005576156,0.0012307127,0.0037274803,0.0029829224,0.0025160236,0.7792659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011414027,0.00001743666,0.00008907375,0.00007331543,0.000001503192,0.000021747986,0.00001939354,0.00001830889,0.00013178466,0.0017173166,0.97466147,0.023237227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041959993,0.000008050179,0.00030045336,0.000099432174,0.0000011364415,0.000029059087,0.00002399938,0.00002495298,0.00004076557,0.0006022797,0.9988612,0.0000045099864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006082922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008038308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21300602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019138831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026213264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30382723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410755619","doi":"10.52783/jier.v5i2.2803","title":"Towards a Tech-Savvy Judiciary: A Comparative Study of Evidentiary Flexibility in India, the UK, US, Canada, and Singapore","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informatics Education and Research","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Political science; Law; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.0526261892202347,"score_gpt":0.3863207120380707,"score_spread":0.333694522817836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410755619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9751338,0.0004200616,0.000071600756,0.0018046168,0.000007809513,0.0000132933765,0.0000185319,0.000002224056,0.02252814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99917454,0.00017640991,0.00002767171,0.00012725963,0.0000012979336,0.0000033585507,0.000008810667,0.0000021477078,0.0004784205],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902968,0.003185531,0.0005705052,0.00047647135,0.0026744371,0.0027961782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97154003,0.015000788,0.0045632576,0.0012856642,0.004698324,0.0029119053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075571625,0.00019340782,0.00046343665,0.005048623,0.01859394,0.015043613,0.001963994,0.0018044431,0.0031451676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027726477,0.0003670382,0.00031480542,0.010504975,0.022986535,0.0050293417,0.010216424,0.0037246696,0.00021486296],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058137437,0.000064916836,0.041563243,0.000076783,0.000024336015,0.0014900859,0.90598994,0.00011670242,0.00021542746,0.03925782,0.0010203648,0.010122311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004959835,0.000025329642,0.06838103,0.0001566134,0.000013765146,0.00024898813,0.9170917,0.00010567534,0.000114958646,0.0008300808,0.012994075,0.00003276249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59609663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8007905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40390337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039719805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039604153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8125641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410919059","doi":"10.59075/chm5qd21","title":"AI-Enhanced Online Dispute Resolution for Family Disputes: Examining Global Trends, Models, Mechanisms, and Ethical Challenges in Pakistan","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œcritical review of social sciences studies","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Political science; Alternative dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.1714260195044965,"score_gpt":0.43438937948432643,"score_spread":0.2629633599798299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410919059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9063192,0.0038681487,0.0051816893,0.018517246,0.00009241523,0.00011517736,0.00018895527,0.00002185456,0.06569526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995917,0.0018040871,0.0008822278,0.00033431695,0.000014351429,0.000015404003,0.000047469755,0.0000037161547,0.0009813526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973947,0.0011437316,0.00017266249,0.0002466777,0.0005189222,0.00052344176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917828,0.0045872163,0.0016426669,0.00031232968,0.0010927821,0.000582138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005047976,0.00020753058,0.00025020656,0.0019415525,0.0047794236,0.0053734495,0.0008884176,0.0011161536,0.0033269848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009291933,0.00019626346,0.00020983587,0.0038961638,0.004168334,0.0056524957,0.0032266206,0.0015821349,0.00023496682],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021878898,0.0004047863,0.15679403,0.0009952766,0.000053238353,0.009245402,0.1482418,0.00519972,0.0008655698,0.38627672,0.010183986,0.2815206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007149255,0.0003087836,0.14373523,0.0011905163,0.000077373414,0.0033889532,0.5712117,0.014816501,0.0018960368,0.11594904,0.14721072,0.00014365421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03015177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030358236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03015177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071441955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008174983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059952557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410929741","doi":"10.33899/arlj.2023.139694.1249","title":"Electronic civil lawsuit administration -An analytical study-","year":2025,"lang":"ar","type":"article","venue":"الرافدین للحقوق","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.019098800921912337,"score_gpt":0.3050041715906635,"score_spread":0.28590537066875116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410929741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9494938,0.000546301,0.0010563405,0.0008696661,0.000037055936,0.0014692503,0.0006801641,0.000022443457,0.04582495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667341,0.001168686,0.0018006586,0.00063303864,0.000048169582,0.001147731,0.00083053514,0.000026293932,0.027610803],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921056,0.0035828443,0.0006317561,0.00051594205,0.0023047647,0.0008589982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9660036,0.018229356,0.00612869,0.0013130268,0.0068234014,0.0015020563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068704933,0.00041625276,0.00044324808,0.007565675,0.004947096,0.0053855795,0.001501579,0.00128143,0.013591551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025847217,0.0007010611,0.00068128086,0.006932277,0.0021205987,0.004252753,0.0032418468,0.0018920098,0.00394456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040584433,0.010611286,0.7492,0.0006860275,0.000100861536,0.0014752065,0.12341656,0.00036808915,0.0007469796,0.018337058,0.006964133,0.087687954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005289302,0.0014580651,0.6552599,0.0005747537,0.00012515356,0.00083713734,0.30835626,0.0014412279,0.0013896922,0.0019027429,0.028540507,0.00006171161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023787081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036188573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023787081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063569285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069732196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04729724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412219642","doi":"","title":"Facing Up To Internet Giants","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Astronomy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.019835486576293852,"score_gpt":0.2546704407873168,"score_spread":0.23483495421102296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412219642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23911603,0.0053559244,0.0026909315,0.36686423,0.0016293332,0.000070426904,0.00007133745,0.00014018064,0.38406166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7019128,0.0028077778,0.0011013971,0.12868191,0.0011348593,0.00007670289,0.00008706593,0.000120863035,0.16407666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974657,0.00067644386,0.0000493882,0.0003529853,0.00048044746,0.0009749648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714065,0.0009469943,0.00030043026,0.00016976138,0.00036103066,0.0010812194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027866845,0.00036747445,0.00034497073,0.0011278947,0.012417773,0.009987714,0.00077388214,0.010827356,0.01508498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057159364,0.00024902017,0.00040478716,0.00095043017,0.007446106,0.008625703,0.0117783975,0.008529858,0.0024404144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007372718,0.00010342175,0.0060965004,0.000102678976,0.00002527616,0.00418242,0.05500402,0.00018374468,0.0012278474,0.6647954,0.21047293,0.05773204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003133433,0.00005752865,0.002149703,0.00023171755,0.0000171733,0.0014001945,0.063726865,0.00038137715,0.00046346674,0.08651933,0.84498537,0.000035970515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043710894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008401927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01508498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003448363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023948913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050464272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412256225","doi":"","title":"International Commercial Arbitration from the Semiotic Perspective","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Perspective (graphical); Arbitration; Business; Computer science; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.038610992132927485,"score_gpt":0.2626871701026297,"score_spread":0.22407617796970222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412256225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008699258,0.006959853,0.005052196,0.017729567,0.00077107863,0.000020744328,0.00005392443,0.000024813718,0.9606885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8756947,0.004607493,0.0025622754,0.0023028885,0.0007137715,0.00009568348,0.000060159204,0.000073857416,0.11388929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729913,0.001761596,0.000081193415,0.0002203209,0.00034984303,0.00028788834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989447,0.00052524835,0.00009217288,0.0001514139,0.00015726396,0.00012916926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029107525,0.00044478933,0.00032271483,0.0015320822,0.0065597175,0.014869564,0.000655245,0.0031610301,0.015398706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033304794,0.00025548364,0.00031511497,0.0017674725,0.016375829,0.007248781,0.0034871423,0.004180084,0.0015294171],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061113874,0.000004279941,0.000032339693,0.000008849033,8.5092324e-7,0.000024429888,0.0022382238,0.000038241335,0.000031894047,0.9936982,0.0025457053,0.0013709926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014804859,0.000018330653,0.00032899107,0.00019927237,0.00000346002,0.00015090678,0.008692296,0.00026612543,0.0001942388,0.6157572,0.3743644,0.000009924651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025231037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003556091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015398706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049904366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020433587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05151379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412268132","doi":"","title":"The Rise of Smart Courts in China:Opportunities and Challenges to the Judiciary in a Digital Age","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; National Research Foundation","keywords":"China; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09133044657446072,"score_gpt":0.24796437806629296,"score_spread":0.15663393149183225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412268132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.908034,0.0022067854,0.0009973281,0.040435027,0.00017068652,0.00004602749,0.0002633295,0.00005599524,0.04779085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99111396,0.00061082095,0.00028395734,0.0015745123,0.00006211057,0.0000081534845,0.00005643691,0.0000061258556,0.0062839324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983455,0.0002002758,0.000077292105,0.00022856602,0.00035546772,0.0007929836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950612,0.00093469623,0.0008717887,0.0003970315,0.0007678405,0.001967441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020822652,0.00016362002,0.00034074706,0.0021215372,0.005083815,0.0059419903,0.00094095094,0.0017517955,0.010084096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032678063,0.000215055,0.0002673663,0.003185477,0.0059954086,0.0047431868,0.003701734,0.002202127,0.0004733453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012108951,0.0002121205,0.2520983,0.00031021552,0.00008329784,0.003221269,0.039089534,0.0013553993,0.002864639,0.5440752,0.026734428,0.12983459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055481025,0.00024473623,0.58787507,0.00039795216,0.000067129615,0.00059796043,0.051747732,0.005401207,0.002001052,0.10809183,0.24333628,0.0001835786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06998793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16268685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06998793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066332784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013004403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13916111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413105556","doi":"10.32920/29896163","title":"Mediation: A Warning Not to Bully a Client Into Settlement","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Settlement (finance); Psychology; Warning system; Computer security; Social psychology; Business; Political science; Computer science; Telecommunications; Law","score_opus":0.019946959751441586,"score_gpt":0.2861765617894584,"score_spread":0.2662296020380168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413105556","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010915687,0.0018292448,0.005248439,0.61238825,0.011479311,0.00013447487,0.00013329613,0.0009176257,0.3569537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18293597,0.0017086039,0.0047686007,0.5294314,0.0043304265,0.00016655918,0.000115702846,0.00039680357,0.27614596],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99402183,0.001956923,0.00042804924,0.00041051992,0.0021770594,0.0010057364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942568,0.0030326904,0.00043658807,0.0005415346,0.0010560914,0.00067626336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045357505,0.0004172418,0.00034749485,0.00033692888,0.0069983155,0.0053456463,0.002126707,0.027648343,0.032134555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028474182,0.0005230592,0.00051712873,0.00021422654,0.0040273834,0.0051332293,0.0042309584,0.01740473,0.015056369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048482958,0.00005546123,0.00083591044,0.000091204616,0.00000843695,0.0033202118,0.0042199525,0.00007003285,0.0013853168,0.044578426,0.9210977,0.024288781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003298006,0.000079015364,0.0012872424,0.00024387495,0.000013732516,0.0022434152,0.0036411863,0.00026866392,0.001028669,0.012831848,0.9782777,0.000051671403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010088829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0213591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032134555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022632517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005345408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10750085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413186576","doi":"10.32920/29896163.v1","title":"Mediation: A Warning Not to Bully a Client Into Settlement","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Settlement (finance); Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Computer security; Criminology; Business; Computer science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.019946959751441586,"score_gpt":0.2861765617894584,"score_spread":0.2662296020380168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413186576","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010915687,0.0018292448,0.005248439,0.61238825,0.011479311,0.00013447487,0.00013329613,0.0009176257,0.3569537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18293597,0.0017086039,0.0047686007,0.5294314,0.0043304265,0.00016655918,0.000115702846,0.00039680357,0.27614596],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99402183,0.001956923,0.00042804924,0.00041051992,0.0021770594,0.0010057364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942568,0.0030326904,0.00043658807,0.0005415346,0.0010560914,0.00067626336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045357505,0.0004172418,0.00034749485,0.00033692888,0.0069983155,0.0053456463,0.002126707,0.027648343,0.032134555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028474182,0.0005230592,0.00051712873,0.00021422654,0.0040273834,0.0051332293,0.0042309584,0.01740473,0.015056369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048482958,0.00005546123,0.00083591044,0.000091204616,0.00000843695,0.0033202118,0.0042199525,0.00007003285,0.0013853168,0.044578426,0.9210977,0.024288781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003298006,0.000079015364,0.0012872424,0.00024387495,0.000013732516,0.0022434152,0.0036411863,0.00026866392,0.001028669,0.012831848,0.9782777,0.000051671403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010088829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0213591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032134555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022632517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005345408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10750085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243841","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v18i1.121","title":"Are Class Actions Progressive? An Enquiry into the Nature and Function of Modern Class Actions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anachronism; Class (philosophy); Proposition; Function (biology); Supreme court; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.050708275690852,"score_gpt":0.2979998407108927,"score_spread":0.24729156502004068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038472235,0.20764187,0.009626854,0.23467818,0.0018498505,0.00006963714,0.00016680406,0.000043604665,0.5074509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84536105,0.11018098,0.003711394,0.015959505,0.0013979904,0.00004012032,0.000089594374,0.000036084934,0.023223251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926702,0.0018086779,0.00024261541,0.0007761413,0.0032585326,0.0012439518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99202526,0.004280277,0.00061754906,0.0005313036,0.0022474043,0.00029820288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011920688,0.00031941608,0.00040008267,0.0033374685,0.0061903256,0.011931724,0.0018039775,0.0034017782,0.002415635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015422423,0.00019154121,0.00030222765,0.0028877861,0.047075737,0.010370755,0.0019874498,0.0049908934,0.0002394283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023494426,0.0000023825478,0.00028979254,0.00006431349,0.0000035025228,0.000020312624,0.0039999685,0.00006122526,0.000038013237,0.9770195,0.003371067,0.015127711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006294862,0.0000117198315,0.006160424,0.0010207534,0.000017723694,0.00007876307,0.014436057,0.00024681148,0.00020769284,0.3866843,0.59109485,0.000034666675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4841008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54754907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5158992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029981486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03296457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.962566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243844","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v18i2.297","title":"Class Actions Related to Police Conduct During Citizen Protests: $6,000,000 Settlement with the City of Montreal","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Equity (law); Class (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Media studies; Law; History; Business; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.05303558900498386,"score_gpt":0.29318390557697344,"score_spread":0.24014831657198957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08717178,0.2899835,0.0011693747,0.24550948,0.013303483,0.0008701565,0.006230892,0.00019392371,0.3555674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62582946,0.19251196,0.0012563202,0.052381814,0.006702353,0.00041147985,0.0035917955,0.00012836482,0.11718647],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910398,0.0010503127,0.00044730146,0.00035027138,0.0050355913,0.002076613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97986996,0.0041052294,0.0024967587,0.00036637185,0.010991791,0.0021698556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007229768,0.0005109522,0.0003829671,0.0062214043,0.008541767,0.005566936,0.0026158863,0.0040774876,0.003502067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020906702,0.00040512302,0.00054202916,0.00611018,0.0031078705,0.00079492806,0.0017321678,0.0034231546,0.00046470715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014454492,0.00016982702,0.021200966,0.0024688193,0.00018376624,0.001171154,0.011833844,0.0012645448,0.00089238794,0.03013289,0.76162285,0.16891442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033479686,0.00008481221,0.12878889,0.0015830108,0.00017037075,0.0001604685,0.0067763445,0.00013771883,0.00056355615,0.00074841414,0.86084753,0.000105436826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9592187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98454326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04758305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04758305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09855581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34524083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243845","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v18i1.97","title":"Pre-Certification Motions that Dispose of or Limit the Issues at Trial: Six Factors for Judges to Consider","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Plaintiff; Dispose pattern; Law; Political science; Computer science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.17952672805259093,"score_gpt":0.3478639290946511,"score_spread":0.16833720104206015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23047167,0.015197292,0.07113582,0.28161138,0.0041681523,0.0017883993,0.00021012001,0.00079040026,0.39462677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8863266,0.0055221952,0.02540784,0.04048717,0.0010159549,0.0004543939,0.00007628903,0.0001348128,0.040574726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702967,0.005587493,0.0030676527,0.002531829,0.01107102,0.0074454057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9624408,0.024683587,0.002280588,0.0010185263,0.0071706777,0.002405872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030630777,0.00056286115,0.00061359437,0.0013537935,0.01751155,0.0106313,0.0028472848,0.011188214,0.0032000535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057287633,0.0013620341,0.0008479059,0.0010909458,0.01548334,0.006151097,0.0028242413,0.013712256,0.0007774253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114768685,0.00020594825,0.010037136,0.0004232463,0.000030471754,0.002467045,0.050633423,0.002628208,0.0055326843,0.7547194,0.091148,0.08205969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034238896,0.0006281297,0.029906936,0.0019164594,0.00019126733,0.0010254997,0.07387368,0.004016447,0.007891336,0.22665627,0.65274346,0.0008082358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2040116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4955037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7959884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026487537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08709194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4056483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243847","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v18i2.233","title":"L’autorisation D’actions Collectives Mondiales au Canada : Deux Solitudes Aux Antipodes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jurisdiction; Tribunal; Petitioner; Political science; Law; Class (philosophy); Authorization; Supreme court","score_opus":0.084940119584619,"score_gpt":0.3018775754107592,"score_spread":0.2169374558261402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1937568,0.018953571,0.012852599,0.07458907,0.002710281,0.000167954,0.0007884788,0.00040178528,0.69577944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7305626,0.0030087347,0.0037981756,0.00590819,0.00034043248,0.00007067274,0.00013354674,0.00009071383,0.2560869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926645,0.0007600446,0.00012558569,0.00088976295,0.0033023066,0.002257818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962442,0.00095655385,0.00021138106,0.0002683484,0.0014506541,0.00086881977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037173582,0.0007608815,0.00054521085,0.0013834712,0.017551918,0.00983454,0.0014704255,0.0036602586,0.01671804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059834574,0.0005607562,0.0010304025,0.0014603267,0.008343804,0.001979569,0.003031711,0.006495977,0.0010996374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011987082,0.000047087626,0.0064388937,0.00014521476,0.00005104396,0.00086522,0.013396719,0.0006907029,0.0018757154,0.8286677,0.08595461,0.061747205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034681343,0.000034184483,0.020970844,0.00017488965,0.000030751326,0.00039327136,0.006580588,0.00093785266,0.0015163779,0.007173026,0.9620727,0.00008093708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9740369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9823094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09224658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09224658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.093507335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6692989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243850","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v18i1.53","title":"Early Disposition or Prejudicial Attrition? An Analysis of Bill 161 and Pre-Certification Dispositive Motions in Class Actions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Certification; Class action; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Waiver; Class (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06517035933986665,"score_gpt":0.31007754579666846,"score_spread":0.24490718645680182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9685236,0.0003643225,0.0003762548,0.0013151044,0.000008910649,0.000057565747,0.00022035386,0.000006681186,0.029127222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99115455,0.00027334722,0.00011016076,0.00031160185,0.000016359545,0.00003159059,0.00027911732,0.0000070628425,0.007816189],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99190944,0.0011179057,0.00029707755,0.0004144579,0.0030738395,0.0031872361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97374064,0.0087326495,0.010253954,0.0011954309,0.0041048783,0.0019724753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068988544,0.000129489,0.0005285832,0.0027327517,0.0053866724,0.0036075534,0.0013848474,0.0013443506,0.007401024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034121957,0.00029585892,0.0005823533,0.0036415604,0.0034311137,0.0022595956,0.0028625724,0.0026416807,0.001006576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003560694,0.00039011476,0.85498977,0.00007846619,0.00004079423,0.0007624008,0.023842938,0.0015667614,0.00034726472,0.071069986,0.004027915,0.042527564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002495301,0.00020553984,0.94687617,0.00014436345,0.000038940474,0.00011198915,0.027512167,0.0018986383,0.00023423563,0.0056107286,0.017303273,0.00003906288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30289912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4662387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6971009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013842114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0129681025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6022721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243851","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v18i2.201","title":"Time for Change: Advancing the Objectives of Class Actions by Removing the “Residency Requirement” from British Columbia’s <i>Class Proceedings Act</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Class action; Class (philosophy); Multinational corporation; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.04377833322512863,"score_gpt":0.2784079865437274,"score_spread":0.23462965331859875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09004819,0.0024999261,0.010069761,0.13122128,0.0014233951,0.00032452558,0.00014867097,0.00022511889,0.76403916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76490915,0.0013687833,0.009198778,0.07185489,0.0003626083,0.00023847223,0.0001538938,0.00013499829,0.1517784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98321575,0.0025616274,0.0004756987,0.0014713528,0.0066270283,0.005648443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830845,0.0045139366,0.0011165304,0.0012059985,0.005843301,0.004235672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01081527,0.0002974785,0.00028847795,0.0016911655,0.01778348,0.016073665,0.0026763894,0.0062936884,0.0069009685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02779565,0.00036487204,0.00038226895,0.0009995978,0.012596431,0.004582878,0.006201392,0.00899265,0.0011559222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005052983,0.00012190011,0.009038749,0.0001296252,0.000018885868,0.0005565917,0.033449262,0.00077852077,0.0015050494,0.70460826,0.123888984,0.12585367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039859933,0.000073765856,0.021139555,0.0005608836,0.000052395146,0.00018667577,0.0235211,0.0007609659,0.0013319352,0.045558326,0.9066593,0.00011519246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78718096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9119157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21281904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038026586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18294646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4281447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243855","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v18i1.5","title":"Simplifying Access to Justice: Michael Eizenga Publishes <i>the Class Actions Handbook</i>, an Essential, Multi-Jurisdictional Resource for Canadian Jurists","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Resource (disambiguation); Class (philosophy); Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10527926338364928,"score_gpt":0.34506674001048976,"score_spread":0.23978747662684047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243855","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005143534,0.058799114,0.0014358938,0.6934997,0.09543755,0.00013926368,0.0006052019,0.00036347454,0.14920542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012686614,0.058157478,0.0025274518,0.2424542,0.024117144,0.0001391843,0.0005991654,0.0007743002,0.65854454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792756,0.0012812107,0.00052721926,0.0012994212,0.015411162,0.002205385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855457,0.0032423313,0.0003623796,0.0004572357,0.008534158,0.0018582761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009148207,0.0009627219,0.00083048496,0.0036143472,0.014259564,0.015774911,0.0027498102,0.011484955,0.015007338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027308846,0.0009316879,0.0006378283,0.0035423674,0.0071710097,0.005783478,0.0032970132,0.012730078,0.0065354095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014310101,0.000002957175,0.000022010101,0.000026837544,0.0000014449057,0.000009139648,0.00011576347,0.000016304997,0.000029888093,0.010107282,0.98271185,0.0069550416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017180039,0.0000012653254,0.00014984742,0.000065677974,0.000002733637,0.000009230382,0.00012120843,0.000020784033,0.00006828771,0.0015366075,0.99801254,0.000010079596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8168498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89985657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18315017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047399253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.104094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3684575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243889","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i2.069","title":"An Examination of the Viability of a Class Action for Adverse Events Following Covid-19 Immunizations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Class action; Procurement; Action (physics); Certification; Immunization; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Adverse effect; Class (philosophy); Political science; Medicine; Business; Law; Immunology; Computer science; State (computer science); Pharmacology","score_opus":0.056958756201114645,"score_gpt":0.31965927187095333,"score_spread":0.2627005156698387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24108054,0.023337612,0.008814673,0.13924864,0.0017675303,0.0010956901,0.0008107353,0.00009175298,0.5837529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95794946,0.0053152023,0.0023766216,0.020142293,0.0005240698,0.00016628423,0.00015873415,0.000022157046,0.013345243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90761817,0.018933963,0.00463483,0.004603205,0.053337213,0.010872725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64599836,0.27532732,0.021343667,0.00512408,0.049305543,0.0029009937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10061217,0.00046697422,0.00071124017,0.0099030975,0.017455924,0.018317187,0.004925683,0.013710605,0.0057975664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18220332,0.0006984017,0.0013066087,0.0062911743,0.017259454,0.0058309976,0.004620748,0.01342394,0.00057291123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000317849,0.00024784196,0.042592566,0.0013269297,0.0001754082,0.0022203408,0.034190763,0.0013981356,0.0010042934,0.77169216,0.05481058,0.09002312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029099864,0.00078679255,0.17011355,0.0082994625,0.0015027509,0.0019552987,0.083502434,0.00790433,0.008155074,0.1409226,0.57587117,0.00069553795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4385125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54555637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5614875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045828562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07381541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87192017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243900","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i2.141","title":"A More Modest Proposal: Bilingual Submissions Made to the Quebec Minister of Justice in the Context of Possible Reforms to the Class Action Regime","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Civil procedure; Law; Economic Justice; Authorization; Class (philosophy); Political science; Certification; Christian ministry; Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Sociology; Computer science; Computer security; History","score_opus":0.054530453903416744,"score_gpt":0.31264440184244136,"score_spread":0.2581139479390246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02360603,0.0024782135,0.005868189,0.7593133,0.014360251,0.0009815929,0.00071543123,0.00029005972,0.19238693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29038873,0.0012096997,0.012874755,0.43272933,0.004730981,0.00062359706,0.00026731918,0.00018117706,0.2569944],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97065955,0.0075160703,0.0009308422,0.0035126065,0.009384654,0.007996295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9628338,0.011631332,0.000959052,0.001726264,0.018312555,0.0045368387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024498986,0.0008723567,0.0006362467,0.0018736012,0.02178042,0.017845111,0.004543594,0.034067616,0.016941322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05371898,0.000672398,0.0013755104,0.0013505593,0.010899988,0.0061450806,0.003938304,0.018712146,0.0024961731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027290505,0.000111468704,0.0031581656,0.00021637396,0.000043046635,0.0018357055,0.010648693,0.0005657729,0.002726167,0.4544923,0.5065381,0.019391308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020484961,0.00015671458,0.0054009976,0.00041471428,0.00008158579,0.00040426766,0.008343657,0.0013827528,0.0018192227,0.022168113,0.95921963,0.00040352752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7943084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87865424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20569158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05086289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14473265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41380584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243901","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i1.109","title":"Revisiting Class Counsel Fee Approvals: Towards Presumptive Validity of Contingency Fee Agreements","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Civil procedure; Law; Settlement (finance); Statutory law; Class (philosophy); Political science; Business; Computer science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.09226277825083468,"score_gpt":0.30618981095151215,"score_spread":0.21392703270067748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20807242,0.005123425,0.11432231,0.066325665,0.0012957791,0.00073278433,0.00033148698,0.0002697211,0.6035265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623009,0.0009683412,0.015420669,0.003536818,0.00027400014,0.000076875695,0.00007395693,0.000043601063,0.017304812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9579934,0.010833979,0.0025146299,0.002524289,0.02291289,0.003220845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9103782,0.05208188,0.007344144,0.0054792273,0.023667317,0.0010492161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030011648,0.00025922744,0.00042241346,0.0031122214,0.0072347503,0.013291105,0.0036273163,0.005243695,0.005698662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10654852,0.00081640156,0.00045242405,0.0019244627,0.013962182,0.008131813,0.0040677665,0.009046068,0.00080630067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056864625,0.00004312949,0.009662406,0.00019944357,0.000013373896,0.000996027,0.014768874,0.0014672364,0.0011037502,0.9018704,0.011171183,0.05864738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112571695,0.0002394559,0.043815978,0.003375686,0.0001458432,0.0013437191,0.02827267,0.02333943,0.012379582,0.4059852,0.48064277,0.0003470814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22337122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.326895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7766288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029362375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043339398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4441421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244041","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i1.111","title":"Class Actions and Beauty Pageants: The Need for Carriage Motion Reform in Ontario","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carriage; Arbitrariness; Class (philosophy); Law; Prejudice (legal term); Law and economics; Opt-out; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Advertising; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05166718948407666,"score_gpt":0.2620847480961143,"score_spread":0.21041755861203765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244041","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105819054,0.12377646,0.0021853808,0.43838012,0.002506438,0.00056330784,0.0011597823,0.00009181381,0.32551768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7785239,0.057711177,0.004010349,0.04263002,0.0011267179,0.00019124935,0.00051151164,0.00005347058,0.11524158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891262,0.0011766719,0.00054878154,0.0006285544,0.0060050427,0.0025147726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686847,0.0070971153,0.0023656972,0.00076864706,0.017802592,0.0032812753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010660037,0.00022356574,0.000459655,0.0027452088,0.010690196,0.009978496,0.0028400577,0.0056768483,0.0068185795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021184605,0.00041308312,0.00045789583,0.0038990371,0.006239689,0.0025670242,0.0019211913,0.0035497013,0.0003728532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001531643,0.000090952264,0.013985888,0.0024201546,0.00006720402,0.0011337737,0.014603737,0.0019361449,0.0015794609,0.5500916,0.26017788,0.15376005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004070154,0.00003833695,0.02853182,0.0011617253,0.00007562595,0.00009540915,0.0048237136,0.00053771737,0.00052568153,0.0062635783,0.95783514,0.00007048798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9862672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16400579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16400579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34142542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9696348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244055","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i1.127","title":"A Call for Clarity: Ontario’s Disjointed Privacy Class Actions and the Need for Privacy Law Reform","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Seclusion; Tort; Punitive damages; Law; Waiver; Political science; Internet privacy; Computer security; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.08655324007435142,"score_gpt":0.287557646966937,"score_spread":0.20100440689258556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244055","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013111235,0.07864412,0.001424914,0.8190023,0.0029003907,0.000089697685,0.00041499682,0.00005394957,0.08435837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5680032,0.09740063,0.007174082,0.26491427,0.0025129523,0.00015652706,0.00043856245,0.000115195326,0.05928459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9778024,0.003234166,0.0009157202,0.0016089185,0.011462064,0.004976631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9270193,0.02398852,0.0039003307,0.0026582717,0.034521077,0.007912408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021450605,0.00036246373,0.00092081795,0.0029701993,0.016052682,0.014690515,0.0047267647,0.010466562,0.0064729555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043899212,0.0006509117,0.00094275066,0.004448984,0.021577269,0.007301475,0.0040265513,0.010547792,0.0005107328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055773067,0.00003308469,0.0033482024,0.001421656,0.00004137448,0.00057030254,0.0119827865,0.00062747824,0.0005073963,0.6127409,0.3009409,0.06773016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035443183,0.000022469922,0.01095654,0.002788047,0.000067513385,0.00013665718,0.007592805,0.00035539275,0.00030515832,0.026730685,0.95090824,0.00010118522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.986938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99396294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19762248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19762248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.45436773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9306442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244066","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i1.139","title":"Consumer Class Arbitration in Canada: It’s about Time","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Class action; Plaintiff; Compulsory arbitration; Damages; Political science; Res judicata; Enforcement; Law; Law and economics; Class (philosophy); Civil procedure; Business; Economic Justice; Economics; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.02158914075490649,"score_gpt":0.2348257044186489,"score_spread":0.21323656366374238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059058916,0.2596727,0.0056727924,0.21029161,0.0032136673,0.00018384159,0.0009822082,0.000100038764,0.46082422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81343657,0.08966148,0.0040731193,0.02531247,0.0007990954,0.000066213695,0.00041421366,0.000079934805,0.06615681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99006397,0.001157531,0.00027212853,0.000706152,0.006125558,0.0016746281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98183,0.0034411608,0.0010485183,0.00043438617,0.011922489,0.0013235731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070780474,0.00020943732,0.0004424972,0.0026694133,0.0075913463,0.009358294,0.0018548277,0.002309871,0.00754946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016503802,0.00021027931,0.00043736672,0.005282797,0.0058700754,0.0018445249,0.0016118108,0.0029706485,0.00035194537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011027465,0.00004767132,0.01087199,0.0010788807,0.00006412456,0.0005169176,0.007852136,0.0011418064,0.00051755295,0.6068761,0.14626507,0.22465749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022229955,0.000025180665,0.016955044,0.0011645586,0.00007278314,0.00014127545,0.0036684922,0.0006649598,0.00057793537,0.012025604,0.96462125,0.000060708757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98604184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.989917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11364369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11364369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2123313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8245466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244104","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i1.051","title":"Shared Goals, Divided Jurisdiction: The Uneasy Relationship Between Class Actions and Administrative Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Class action; Law; Political science; Legislature; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Civil procedure; Dispute resolution; Administrative law; Arbitration; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.21093960834006106,"score_gpt":0.3321303451885609,"score_spread":0.12119073684849982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10183067,0.021818487,0.023608223,0.1787668,0.00067375303,0.00016528547,0.00019038125,0.000056614863,0.6728898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756516,0.0028385941,0.0027016916,0.005525869,0.00016520906,0.000037134214,0.000025337853,0.000020824904,0.013033659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9745175,0.008436862,0.00059857924,0.0017286371,0.010467745,0.0042505683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726064,0.015066434,0.002046135,0.0012774924,0.007083227,0.0019201863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019130398,0.0002868817,0.0004987852,0.003293058,0.012470112,0.016448893,0.0022449733,0.0034055728,0.006756301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033879083,0.0003419368,0.00038002958,0.0034983417,0.048938014,0.0067536333,0.0064993384,0.006114873,0.00024918737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008888675,0.0000078688045,0.0011813624,0.00003978753,0.000005607199,0.000071677,0.004563682,0.00017726191,0.00004796144,0.97837627,0.00402149,0.011498124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041962012,0.000044161276,0.021784155,0.00085362996,0.00006661747,0.00025343985,0.02843486,0.0016413329,0.00044724022,0.64434457,0.3020092,0.0000788305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76934016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86030626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76934016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061855227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07900889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46403646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244135","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i2.143","title":"The Limits of Case Management: A Review and Principled Approach to the Court’s General Management Powers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Normative; Variety (cybernetics); Divergence (linguistics); Class (philosophy); Power (physics); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Legislation; Test (biology); Sociology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.043999075383298086,"score_gpt":0.2787616463311528,"score_spread":0.23476257094785472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018832728,0.2844219,0.111467645,0.20889753,0.0022228565,0.0012687766,0.0004710843,0.00034740282,0.3720702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7542153,0.10347999,0.0810003,0.032906733,0.002812411,0.0011209606,0.0002676027,0.00010529803,0.024091445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9418259,0.019614028,0.003975392,0.003201598,0.028452449,0.002930525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9042075,0.061450485,0.004451596,0.0034163063,0.025365448,0.0011086322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07098243,0.0007592034,0.0014776706,0.016034052,0.008950361,0.023816807,0.006129023,0.008960475,0.001638215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065382086,0.0012366887,0.0010543274,0.009521689,0.034588534,0.0060815043,0.0035995322,0.0094398465,0.00033349014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009622985,0.00001299763,0.0005162399,0.00048606363,0.00001555813,0.00013138526,0.0017631663,0.0013074916,0.00017306638,0.95040447,0.011412604,0.033767324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040066046,0.0000483582,0.0037645714,0.007190994,0.00015824682,0.00030833925,0.0020364032,0.004898195,0.0010681616,0.5382199,0.44209483,0.0001717812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44520822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57689416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44520822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07331836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13664816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88523364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244142","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i2.005","title":"Book Review: <i>Defending Class Actions in Canada: A Guide for Defendants</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Class (philosophy); Class action; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Programming language; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.04436887130234667,"score_gpt":0.28444372100498244,"score_spread":0.24007484970263576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006561435,0.23234975,0.0014988167,0.19424257,0.055628344,0.0011637966,0.010868756,0.0012470911,0.50234467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003338841,0.10547742,0.0013251286,0.039158728,0.005317879,0.00037197888,0.0031332292,0.00031199976,0.84156483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942462,0.00023609951,0.0002104887,0.00024244991,0.004512575,0.0005522156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777169,0.001862245,0.0006488172,0.0002622606,0.018235883,0.0012738369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027059244,0.0015409434,0.0018181483,0.009996237,0.006517483,0.007862343,0.004155147,0.007338417,0.075140305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014185476,0.0011277222,0.001040479,0.0153528005,0.0025210644,0.0022125589,0.0011768754,0.0052053835,0.031726968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.679527e-7,0.0000019381635,0.000021572565,0.000050283343,7.5326597e-7,0.000004394652,0.000009308465,0.000015237514,0.000007072282,0.0003190863,0.994136,0.0054333443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026935656,0.000002685596,0.0005885244,0.00030731753,0.000005815489,0.000012718014,0.000050363604,0.00002751614,0.000019206083,0.00022334064,0.99874806,0.000011728603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93704945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9817616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075140305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051828057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15196937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413591068","doi":"10.64628/aam.dn9p5g5cj","title":"Online Streaming Act claims to level the playing field … but for whom?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Level playing field; Computer science; Internet privacy; Business; Mathematics; Finance","score_opus":0.0832378161214595,"score_gpt":0.3093397743322972,"score_spread":0.2261019582108377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413591068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085111424,0.001037212,0.014216704,0.109186165,0.0024435383,0.00007165593,0.0002800599,0.00026796313,0.7873852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7864839,0.0005780457,0.0031169506,0.0071251397,0.0016365752,0.00006570095,0.00016369764,0.00020304807,0.20062695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956268,0.0016025053,0.00017574432,0.00048913795,0.0013034234,0.0008022711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98431164,0.008308829,0.0016294711,0.0019834046,0.002198905,0.0015676965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006208625,0.0004131731,0.00040809528,0.0011403793,0.0058501437,0.0114304675,0.0013605763,0.0069162925,0.065444514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031790946,0.00028788424,0.000310266,0.0012568999,0.0053839856,0.0125284325,0.0030093917,0.006117256,0.009153997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016721939,0.00014251661,0.00401521,0.000039094823,0.000013847997,0.00021595451,0.00754806,0.00019718129,0.00038847578,0.8224885,0.104224086,0.06055972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007430343,0.000059468315,0.0074342103,0.00035850803,0.000047339985,0.00043986796,0.027558077,0.005109877,0.002104763,0.5557238,0.40102065,0.00006909309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008439316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007171068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065444514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024013778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025209745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2189337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413722868","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v19i1.39","title":"The Commonality Test in Class Action Certification: The Battleground of Screening Merits and Fair Process","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Class action; Test (biology); Class (philosophy); Process (computing); Action (physics); Computer science; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Programming language; Physics; Biology","score_opus":0.10289825405088047,"score_gpt":0.3236083298095724,"score_spread":0.2207100757586919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413722868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054981794,0.005054801,0.3185331,0.13764288,0.0022627993,0.00087538373,0.000118448166,0.0002065038,0.48032427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88761705,0.0015232445,0.066791296,0.017996892,0.001800042,0.00083691045,0.0000727023,0.00013234904,0.023229502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9358134,0.032031994,0.001977188,0.0059673632,0.02039281,0.0038172114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89494544,0.0878758,0.003613207,0.005398856,0.0059245904,0.0022421565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07276399,0.00078820094,0.001913877,0.00439553,0.010489527,0.018153926,0.0049115545,0.022730602,0.008761648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1841648,0.0008879314,0.0019173777,0.0023432316,0.06898667,0.034344297,0.011586927,0.022119116,0.0012558169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013088753,0.000012162687,0.00025403392,0.000013888926,0.000004004396,0.00009408044,0.00047047558,0.00016246745,0.00004766455,0.9947648,0.00085504184,0.0033083125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032108575,0.000048393627,0.00042559233,0.00013864948,0.000022007856,0.00012526233,0.00055930496,0.0018811479,0.00038083782,0.9853349,0.011011656,0.000040268496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008047274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007048047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9919527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009130326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018229222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38481736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413722882","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v19i1.5","title":"The (Un)Enforceability of Class Action Waivers in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Political science; Computer science; Physics; Artificial intelligence; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.043397756107215815,"score_gpt":0.26007170663569673,"score_spread":0.21667395052848093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413722882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1290194,0.18037635,0.003809244,0.14843011,0.0023944394,0.00033508288,0.0018551507,0.00016539973,0.5336149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87725675,0.05715593,0.002279715,0.014363489,0.00047683404,0.00006799373,0.000420208,0.00007400314,0.047905035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97540504,0.0017744319,0.000992353,0.0012607283,0.016367136,0.0042004543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9465772,0.011901031,0.0026716841,0.0012365859,0.034817785,0.0027955838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014157777,0.00028402577,0.00063922553,0.0046252464,0.013118974,0.012078419,0.0028854788,0.003051671,0.0025263808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046179958,0.00050446094,0.00045997082,0.007245841,0.0073373155,0.0018478814,0.0020515977,0.003735429,0.00017092036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118372154,0.00005574701,0.011880764,0.0013235344,0.00008917952,0.00051752705,0.01276032,0.0026224644,0.0010836573,0.6499908,0.1323887,0.18716899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003702783,0.00006196719,0.06346821,0.0018221069,0.0001920906,0.00013327113,0.0054652602,0.001500635,0.001405962,0.01745573,0.9082585,0.00019930213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99586475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1753191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1753191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35607412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9565129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413733821","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v19i1.99","title":"Class Action Notice and Access to Justice: An accessibility and Design Analysis of Class Action Notice Campaigns","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Class action; Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Economic Justice; Political science; Business; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; State (computer science); Programming language; Physics","score_opus":0.17736318967667777,"score_gpt":0.3858146311411724,"score_spread":0.20845144146449465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413733821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93039274,0.0006763172,0.011456249,0.0012389739,0.000027846292,0.0035841893,0.0015539468,0.00012774514,0.05094197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98124146,0.0003022087,0.010192427,0.00027162326,0.000012306378,0.001902615,0.0005214781,0.00005988559,0.005495943],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728874,0.011521638,0.0012885288,0.0016460075,0.009721309,0.002935073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8044941,0.13369416,0.015555958,0.0075331596,0.036276415,0.0024461432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023137134,0.00035811609,0.0005852624,0.006153887,0.006316154,0.0056193834,0.001260987,0.00070163695,0.0063111163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11257309,0.00041466302,0.00085401104,0.008077515,0.0058931718,0.0025343685,0.0028846257,0.0015288476,0.00032796428],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080062385,0.0012394037,0.26240554,0.0032169032,0.0002683309,0.00055067486,0.4047276,0.002383656,0.0035023945,0.04554298,0.007313219,0.2680487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020060332,0.0012800876,0.69466573,0.001264971,0.00049928256,0.00012881843,0.20143439,0.0038193986,0.0037894228,0.0066477684,0.086105555,0.00016397767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63938767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69120115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36061233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06328955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05208423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7254721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413802921","doi":"10.29173/mlj1457","title":"Online Dispute Resolution (ODR): New Approaches to Enhance Initiatives of Civil Dispute Resolution","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Online dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute mechanism; Political science; Resolution (logic); Business; Law and economics; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07205024897488184,"score_gpt":0.2725232801985187,"score_spread":0.20047303122363686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413802921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119510025,0.0049766866,0.13170375,0.1618203,0.0021583186,0.001837112,0.00027351122,0.0016199627,0.5761003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5576392,0.0038709468,0.26981917,0.025993276,0.0008480027,0.001462877,0.00038250224,0.00029246436,0.1396915],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98812443,0.0067645404,0.00038267963,0.0005920025,0.0029672664,0.0011691634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738105,0.008762141,0.001884923,0.0034540496,0.005318183,0.006770212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015699293,0.00045261174,0.00037546974,0.0033783717,0.0106665315,0.009811471,0.0050245384,0.003797804,0.01666976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016254876,0.0005297263,0.00045121278,0.0028701266,0.006995072,0.0092843985,0.013203617,0.003980933,0.0026004012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009469209,0.001994698,0.015896348,0.0006973057,0.000041820316,0.0008037352,0.03902302,0.0011864965,0.0047925557,0.29904637,0.06753154,0.5688914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010872716,0.00021243734,0.010856754,0.00039213197,0.000023324614,0.0004995695,0.022136914,0.00190514,0.0015752392,0.02956975,0.93264496,0.00007512752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10606852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3030822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10606852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011435107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045302194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21090227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803032","doi":"10.29173/mlj1455","title":"Preface","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.019370120962748837,"score_gpt":0.23077663905465284,"score_spread":0.211406518091904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010199231,0.005453196,0.0012951487,0.045818217,0.15266095,0.00046360496,0.01006498,0.0009796175,0.7822444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027176093,0.0022469647,0.00057692576,0.0055501643,0.012298292,0.000110796354,0.0041734073,0.00038977078,0.97193617],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985833,0.000110799454,0.00006614699,0.00016152034,0.0008984737,0.00017967263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903951,0.00070304604,0.0002083284,0.00054843846,0.006867341,0.0012777391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018772876,0.00078570633,0.00068483903,0.0034657877,0.006075336,0.005848685,0.0018669189,0.0017817223,0.47417235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008835926,0.00043924147,0.00041302072,0.0027319554,0.0010170842,0.0023194079,0.0019276353,0.0030912566,0.28184474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065751074,0.000007828862,0.00007045223,0.00003907978,5.6422067e-7,0.00001740348,0.00006189753,0.000015180915,0.000056053137,0.0025498352,0.98719376,0.009981352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013108158,0.0000029052865,0.0002317295,0.00005435578,5.1132156e-7,0.000014940658,0.00007363959,0.000012251595,0.000024013298,0.00041968637,0.9991622,0.0000023871448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08032081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13664857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47417235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062239016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012044834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414150982","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i3.9900","title":"Virtuous Argumentation and Unendorsed Claims","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Adversarial system; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Faith; Function (biology); Virtuous circle and vicious circle","score_opus":0.010125270121212532,"score_gpt":0.2357595170268332,"score_spread":0.22563424690562067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414150982","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25033823,0.0048606102,0.37596408,0.053786553,0.00060881226,0.00019521818,0.0000874446,0.00020870334,0.3139504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829206,0.00037829965,0.012328367,0.00057737384,0.00012156758,0.000054260283,0.00001994387,0.000019831947,0.0035797106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9643508,0.02458128,0.0017125701,0.002320048,0.0051958608,0.0018395022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9117662,0.06488765,0.007331478,0.008743609,0.004890738,0.0023803571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039716814,0.0005535263,0.0007819083,0.0029026554,0.0055346554,0.011818922,0.002402181,0.0061846403,0.0040103863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06317516,0.0005058417,0.0010825642,0.0015426376,0.039286897,0.015610076,0.010051059,0.0057466626,0.00052405335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012908897,0.000009190394,0.0001585929,0.000016294705,0.0000059382255,0.0000687081,0.0016090452,0.0002931217,0.00006103529,0.9961046,0.00012460035,0.0015360559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009730327,0.0000056116455,0.000058137168,0.000034080804,0.0000037171233,0.000036000893,0.00048730746,0.0009364939,0.00009391345,0.99575305,0.0025774555,0.0000046264586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007660803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006442171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039716814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034766179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027212894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2100451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414761957","doi":"10.55908/sdgs.v13i9.4534","title":"THE RISE OF AI IN PROCEDURAL JURISPRUDENCE: GLOBAL INNOVATIONS, LEGAL FRAMEWORKS, AND FUTURE IMPLICATIONS","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Sustainable Development","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Adversarial system; Process (computing); Transformative learning; Normative; Legal aspects of computing; Automation; Shadow (psychology)","score_opus":0.004433881490708337,"score_gpt":0.2569921014090078,"score_spread":0.25255821991829946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414761957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058967892,0.10535843,0.07756972,0.36219794,0.0017209153,0.00010330544,0.000099849494,0.00025007277,0.39373183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9294287,0.029718237,0.021800077,0.010402998,0.0015569875,0.00011302414,0.000061955514,0.000110837645,0.0068071308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98772407,0.0072387476,0.00048032482,0.0014918909,0.002061146,0.0010038377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96913975,0.021523658,0.0013570727,0.0038444377,0.0031547907,0.0009803133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02427539,0.00053859694,0.00077267876,0.0033591778,0.0040763454,0.015126942,0.002497533,0.0048812535,0.0054945615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015708685,0.00034394814,0.000819859,0.0045214123,0.07479576,0.021053536,0.007168688,0.009809761,0.0005640408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070587284,0.000012631252,0.0002900255,0.00007667568,0.00000393142,0.000044266664,0.0021334905,0.00036027952,0.00009485707,0.97634935,0.00067031826,0.019957071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009582055,0.000037770107,0.0016403347,0.0008084436,0.000012474445,0.00018107567,0.0062812255,0.0016711616,0.00046461236,0.89865977,0.090202056,0.000031451473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040196786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002977063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02427539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009905702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008668259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12838209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414833933","doi":"10.29173/alr2849","title":"Just Words? Judicial Reasons as Remedy in Administrative Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Remedial education; Normative; Function (biology); Citizenship; Judicial review","score_opus":0.035931516553933965,"score_gpt":0.32654583388016484,"score_spread":0.2906143173262309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414833933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03932018,0.04588812,0.052142788,0.1542347,0.0023381878,0.000074544376,0.00008299103,0.00016054205,0.705758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95297897,0.006631593,0.005207888,0.011829717,0.0012382484,0.000070367634,0.000025917287,0.000072004485,0.02194517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98678106,0.006170911,0.00055988866,0.0012594409,0.0033347986,0.0018938597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880745,0.008153246,0.0007961783,0.0010021761,0.0016193696,0.00035464705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011235642,0.0003387515,0.00064905395,0.0024394512,0.0059575997,0.014792925,0.0015509038,0.008215554,0.00436244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022108918,0.00039390515,0.0007212462,0.0018217025,0.047509912,0.015634518,0.0041134674,0.008817708,0.0005547884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015288697,0.000001398636,0.000028212502,0.0000064737746,8.768473e-7,0.000007571555,0.00025365598,0.000053446143,0.000016645425,0.99774987,0.0005547303,0.0013254808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011530402,0.000010798166,0.00024885833,0.00010140248,0.0000075403764,0.000028367773,0.00089892815,0.00022244165,0.00015739635,0.9266694,0.071626455,0.00001685803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024345435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034743477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97565454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012820948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013315147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09302288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414939293","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2505.09338","title":"Llama See, Llama Do: A Mechanistic Perspective on Contextual Entrainment and Distraction in LLMs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ArXiv.org","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Pennsylvania; Microsoft Research","keywords":"Entrainment (biomusicology); Distraction; Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.028881986883485204,"score_gpt":0.2766045203722433,"score_spread":0.2477225334887581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414939293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8762667,0.00047732584,0.11142546,0.0007531709,0.00008414702,0.0001133357,0.00021784799,0.0017022036,0.008959766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926058,0.000053979074,0.0064370087,0.00013330193,0.000012724581,0.00004671972,0.00004900739,0.00008444694,0.00057701167],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937135,0.00020959838,0.00003425197,0.00014193366,0.00015383628,0.00008906623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974323,0.0015034765,0.00032509316,0.0004178413,0.00014821581,0.0001729848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081200554,0.00052910415,0.00044844125,0.00034873243,0.0003511536,0.0011777612,0.00069650076,0.0007152362,0.004203567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008354265,0.0003667743,0.00044151634,0.00019062277,0.0010349907,0.001352143,0.0018574487,0.0011165135,0.00044158116],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020516329,0.00032727505,0.037803072,0.0008639603,0.00021474747,0.0023152197,0.007724321,0.04483121,0.7827547,0.034347236,0.0016081672,0.08515846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024135526,0.002356958,0.14682966,0.00035259,0.0003453613,0.0024496838,0.0043872856,0.38720435,0.31512198,0.12368209,0.016645007,0.0003837035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001054023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008951003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004203567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005794311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041110284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014062285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415769884","doi":"10.47649/vau.25.v77.i2.35","title":"SOME ASPECTS OF LEGAL REGULATION OF GIFT CERTIFICATES IN THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"«Вестник Атырауского университета имени Халела Досмухамедова»","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Certificate; Limiting; The Republic; Legal certainty; Lease; Legal practice","score_opus":0.019440547667870345,"score_gpt":0.2459185042771994,"score_spread":0.22647795660932907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415769884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56955403,0.034192633,0.015813446,0.040009536,0.0007573303,0.00014757586,0.0003874518,0.00021783588,0.33892015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98603904,0.002358873,0.0014774519,0.0017467083,0.00011478409,0.00002728101,0.00006621543,0.000011910283,0.008157681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949096,0.002184581,0.00056189415,0.00049047667,0.0010392272,0.0008142574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994628,0.0028167875,0.0012097752,0.00041920086,0.0008050844,0.00012122115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044382485,0.00017007581,0.00029117288,0.0013364467,0.0057892418,0.005783056,0.0010431997,0.0020280597,0.0022264353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073848823,0.00029809796,0.0004162506,0.0027518156,0.008485492,0.001700648,0.0017212312,0.0022039854,0.00031533587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041846044,0.000035455225,0.008151969,0.00023512745,0.000014642112,0.0012298457,0.022654144,0.0012663604,0.0015747279,0.9381885,0.0036171211,0.022990318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047899004,0.00016435578,0.113422364,0.0013861655,0.0001058467,0.0036919708,0.03665866,0.0035212704,0.005262295,0.1913344,0.6441387,0.0002660887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052427396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034233272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052427396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009414061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008317686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10424447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415812834","doi":"10.3390/genealogy9040122","title":"Clash Actions: Indigenous Peoples’ Human Rights and Class Actions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genealogy","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Indigenous; Class action; International human rights law; Class (philosophy); Economic Justice; Convention; Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.023401869487925296,"score_gpt":0.2796540741449989,"score_spread":0.2562522046570736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415812834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10731671,0.0064850645,0.004649812,0.047275808,0.00036548794,0.000042382486,0.000023124147,0.000017787752,0.83382374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9603471,0.0017113179,0.0010471492,0.0034980753,0.000121242105,0.000023611063,0.0000081796325,0.000010334838,0.033233028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614716,0.0013851945,0.000066733715,0.00033722652,0.0008459936,0.0012176848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781454,0.0010969633,0.00033930846,0.00018496274,0.00023932966,0.00032477794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003464597,0.00024266187,0.00025732347,0.0011586082,0.016222175,0.008274822,0.0011918894,0.0047429684,0.007604585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005191939,0.00016446969,0.0002513243,0.0010100583,0.053385183,0.005508344,0.00908308,0.004767736,0.00024156376],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004435248,0.000014309401,0.0009477268,0.000028528344,0.0000025330587,0.00026225825,0.08834443,0.000061597544,0.00008713695,0.90002334,0.0014640436,0.008759747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010659876,0.0000396547,0.011657366,0.0007101544,0.000024003393,0.00076809,0.27767733,0.00040665874,0.00052238454,0.327978,0.38015223,0.000053482538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17412591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24544732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17412591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01017933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01148468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34622478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416203313","doi":"10.63056/acad.004.04.1039","title":"Necessity and Challenges for Online Dispute Resolution System in Pakistan; A Comparative Perspective","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Online dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Legislation; Dispute mechanism; Alternative dispute resolution; Resolution (logic)","score_opus":0.1250503657529557,"score_gpt":0.4472231501169448,"score_spread":0.3221727843639891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416203313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3318535,0.008318663,0.005534352,0.028616592,0.00034786132,0.00019993375,0.00023206815,0.000052565905,0.62484443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985474,0.0029393428,0.0010505792,0.00057553075,0.00005104678,0.000019067185,0.00004137515,0.0000071912464,0.009841833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946641,0.0022798632,0.00030304436,0.0003935413,0.0014221016,0.0009373907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935313,0.0026731882,0.0009995637,0.00030042266,0.0017226201,0.0007728848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004577476,0.00012327568,0.00018492046,0.0023972907,0.009702646,0.013225629,0.0008932337,0.001715627,0.011452553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074530733,0.0001665392,0.00018222808,0.0037595176,0.0052277874,0.0071548447,0.002277207,0.0014311391,0.00073703966],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057116104,0.00012709085,0.011722012,0.00048347792,0.0000123576665,0.0025894742,0.06616101,0.0005222555,0.00036048793,0.8235599,0.009639666,0.08476513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019480929,0.00015220857,0.03259652,0.000823803,0.000033100216,0.0018654017,0.40392512,0.0026854663,0.0008357177,0.058890637,0.49811107,0.000061461586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031923816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03224315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031923816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011673502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012941556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084697545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416386072","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5604150","title":"FAA Chapter 4-An Empirical Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Harassment; Supreme court; Enforcement; Federal Arbitration Act; Legislature; Legislative intent; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.020734670698215895,"score_gpt":0.29857483412236946,"score_spread":0.2778401634241536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416386072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6085998,0.0046118614,0.03150962,0.012464532,0.000573018,0.0026817834,0.028996356,0.000667323,0.3098958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90645605,0.0018091198,0.00867374,0.001432618,0.00048475122,0.0021717814,0.011569867,0.00025635186,0.0671457],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99474746,0.00227881,0.00031717913,0.0006288693,0.001407359,0.0006202348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9405382,0.049577862,0.0019428259,0.002517686,0.0046631536,0.00076027063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005527548,0.0010283157,0.0009254038,0.0071421433,0.0034305248,0.003946908,0.002660933,0.0016117264,0.1100765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042615768,0.00041960928,0.0017797321,0.005837868,0.0023019658,0.0032921375,0.0020976488,0.0024490766,0.010457025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008811142,0.004511143,0.3690283,0.0014214579,0.00066171825,0.0011769906,0.009428507,0.005564561,0.0016255006,0.32687718,0.115963645,0.16285992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002892288,0.0013029063,0.48366186,0.0026918075,0.0017308994,0.0010181451,0.05710187,0.023035038,0.00551539,0.14701575,0.2764481,0.00018907756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026294285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013141051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1100765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002976436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038929195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36824256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417031845","doi":"10.4324/9781003376248-11","title":"France","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Jury; Criminal justice; Cornerstone; Economic Justice; Criminal law","score_opus":0.011954241704752368,"score_gpt":0.2076278055096764,"score_spread":0.19567356380492404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417031845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047469414,0.01019989,0.002424179,0.0041672974,0.0016007487,0.000057425998,0.0024770065,0.0010515897,0.9732748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02317133,0.0050084954,0.002447468,0.0010618456,0.0004817101,0.00006938785,0.0012592016,0.0003597428,0.966141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911946,0.000116929354,0.000035261,0.00028964784,0.0003149938,0.0001237122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996197,0.00009079844,0.00003926572,0.000058197733,0.00011315168,0.00007876046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049339497,0.0017376184,0.0007576654,0.0024849703,0.003586466,0.0090284245,0.0009747471,0.0032832436,0.37804952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001026634,0.0003854206,0.000982191,0.00206115,0.0010569763,0.0024862257,0.0018283093,0.0031016055,0.13965324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016982025,0.000118332035,0.0014975492,0.00048903737,0.00004095296,0.0013773985,0.00073713815,0.00087178464,0.0022683227,0.37842846,0.31661636,0.29738483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009024809,0.000011800873,0.0006327308,0.00005339005,0.0000027776334,0.00028119574,0.00006949841,0.00008011632,0.00020765755,0.0025207484,0.996123,0.000008129284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044326346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043809928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95567364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006409895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031002744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417040781","doi":"10.53555/kuey.v30i3.11173","title":"Online Resolution Mechanism In The Indian Judicial System: An Exploratory Study","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Online dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Exploratory research; Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; Negotiation; Statutory law; Process (computing); Resolution (logic)","score_opus":0.03666160408978223,"score_gpt":0.2765656662745615,"score_spread":0.23990406218477925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417040781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745702,0.00023475684,0.00090066355,0.00065545103,0.00001153403,0.00014495468,0.00013860049,0.000016750766,0.023327244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997044,0.00021566974,0.00049969094,0.00018021568,0.000012597007,0.00004092726,0.000058107988,0.0000074482487,0.0019412482],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99176764,0.0031469455,0.0005280498,0.00062656467,0.0016158293,0.0023150365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801568,0.009251347,0.0053165774,0.0014614252,0.0022012517,0.0016125697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036103446,0.00016974466,0.00035482988,0.006416555,0.007483509,0.009272993,0.0022605022,0.0012440532,0.00531617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014817831,0.0004109964,0.00033363578,0.008764577,0.0049239756,0.004019835,0.0044418992,0.0022641886,0.0006978442],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013403721,0.0014475625,0.373564,0.00046787687,0.00004667887,0.0045876037,0.46522048,0.0008236177,0.0023437086,0.074863784,0.004291879,0.072208755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008736731,0.0002128881,0.30420494,0.00021725678,0.000049382426,0.0016447792,0.6479083,0.0019518699,0.00096188724,0.0028133944,0.03995996,0.000066694854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021997694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029071562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021997694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006689248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007894397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048534155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W56587732","doi":"10.29173/alr324","title":"Access to Justice, Judicial Economy, and Behaviour Modification: Exploring the Goals of Canadian Class Actions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Jurisdiction; Economic Justice; Law; Commission; Political science; Supreme court; Legislation; Law and economics; Judicial review; Class (philosophy); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.12579439872818157,"score_gpt":0.3181922832417748,"score_spread":0.19239788451359321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W56587732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24825203,0.009810981,0.0028795227,0.13251941,0.00020864554,0.00013156254,0.00012844788,0.0000410247,0.60602844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758917,0.0019733375,0.0007204926,0.0047827745,0.000031136977,0.000027220438,0.000018193676,0.000010795836,0.016544336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98778987,0.0016254579,0.00021134692,0.0006393047,0.00499747,0.004736539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98725766,0.0057167625,0.00094661047,0.00031678283,0.003600943,0.0021612449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006866038,0.00031563695,0.00046418628,0.0029984245,0.02798793,0.018713636,0.0028981888,0.005573748,0.0037436453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016777607,0.00030930378,0.00044107967,0.0036707697,0.034689713,0.0035062414,0.0064049074,0.006104941,0.00015200925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009759477,0.000025639654,0.0054878164,0.00004385472,0.000006898352,0.00020591562,0.03570531,0.0003027494,0.00013000518,0.935423,0.008937401,0.013721492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061635044,0.000058279424,0.08717033,0.0010283957,0.00014335691,0.00026803114,0.255617,0.0028954388,0.0011558721,0.23652235,0.41475117,0.0003280906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98719007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9938804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16760798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16760798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19841792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9654568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W609359509","doi":"","title":"The Implications of Janus on Issuer Liability in Jurisdicitions Rejecting Collective Scienter","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Issuer; Liability; Janus; Law and economics; Law; Business; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.015753308695863232,"score_gpt":0.2510406110741927,"score_spread":0.23528730237832945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W609359509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42955148,0.0015760027,0.0040329066,0.122642756,0.00056888483,0.0001574577,0.00016404549,0.00004742133,0.44125906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851753,0.00024902253,0.00031390958,0.0077932985,0.00036654627,0.000056592784,0.00002108787,0.000013481249,0.006010808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98024654,0.0060276925,0.00092808873,0.0024392002,0.002967704,0.0073907264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94482225,0.034811556,0.007853622,0.0027256482,0.005527663,0.0042593335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020064812,0.0003648543,0.0012587449,0.0025760822,0.016528634,0.015509398,0.0036672174,0.019511232,0.015863381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07174208,0.0006153073,0.0013881855,0.0019565504,0.025225757,0.011104578,0.010757097,0.013464867,0.0010824146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002178704,0.00024512818,0.018857483,0.000051989908,0.000049282753,0.0022111582,0.0065473737,0.0014803535,0.00024724638,0.9518328,0.011019555,0.0072398484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031887088,0.00032620275,0.02751932,0.00048862887,0.0002032895,0.0009871835,0.04471862,0.005135184,0.0010924803,0.8706007,0.048423294,0.00018622134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023738397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03117421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023738397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008048573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010388309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10611415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6886002418","doi":"10.14288/1.0018319","title":"[British Columbia Court of Appeal 1992-06-05]","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; High Court; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.013873367052740802,"score_gpt":0.22213637250188864,"score_spread":0.20826300544914783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6886002418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01759063,0.0044829794,0.00051825406,0.108005635,0.008049956,0.0008031325,0.012440281,0.00055539387,0.84755385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030703621,0.0010551253,0.0003131674,0.101562016,0.00065434544,0.00054829015,0.0013559542,0.00015819809,0.86364925],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920176,0.00038854798,0.0002633097,0.0007662179,0.0022035176,0.004360756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99458116,0.0016513197,0.00014111641,0.00034878813,0.002543939,0.00073373754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002950943,0.0022238006,0.0029613094,0.004391859,0.045508258,0.02190987,0.007662665,0.05619028,0.079313695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012678581,0.003436456,0.0027021423,0.0053012534,0.0045613614,0.0032690102,0.004498023,0.043701444,0.017215174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017928991,0.0001775662,0.0016810931,0.00015054176,0.000071698225,0.0009601151,0.0009945136,0.00038088826,0.00032713506,0.07058682,0.9170405,0.0074498667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024632463,0.00004973524,0.020510258,0.00080880313,0.00023261906,0.00023136746,0.004406347,0.0009491686,0.00068477564,0.011681098,0.9597909,0.00040859918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96510017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99050635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079313695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06372872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09628785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46238637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6889089995","doi":"10.25392/leicester.data.27880083","title":"The Many Faces of Court-Connected Non-Adjudicative ADR in Civil and Commercial Cases: A Comparative Study Across England and Wales, Ontario, Italy, and Turkey","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"University of Leicester","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Civil society; Dispute mechanism; Power (physics); Inequality; Law reform","score_opus":0.020524104335769542,"score_gpt":0.2582805927837209,"score_spread":0.23775648844795136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6889089995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777765,0.0015998711,0.00009834735,0.00081042264,0.000019083112,0.00005255557,0.000066580375,0.0000017510521,0.01957491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994466,0.0010905849,0.00007811519,0.00028924644,0.000009459031,0.000031092055,0.000072271,0.0000055300943,0.003957682],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99413437,0.0016180502,0.00033000714,0.00048421108,0.0013275312,0.0021057916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99176943,0.0029961567,0.0016497314,0.0004660742,0.0019727629,0.0011457937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00400554,0.00020367054,0.0005932463,0.002827501,0.0078077912,0.0046608956,0.001569611,0.0011561734,0.0038889407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009739,0.0004927684,0.00030612893,0.0058914567,0.008290152,0.0023224265,0.0035372253,0.0012693331,0.000404082],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026801846,0.00016805645,0.14925803,0.0007311839,0.0000666176,0.008804861,0.7746964,0.00020276853,0.0012478116,0.026256,0.004804944,0.033495296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012418819,0.00005970227,0.30266753,0.00026937894,0.000027777933,0.0009746835,0.6599604,0.00009315891,0.00013231942,0.00034540915,0.035421383,0.00003587731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7664071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9381158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23359293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040972598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4699372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6906471903","doi":"10.17863/cam.71183","title":"Being Conscious of Unconscionability in Modern Times: Heller v Uber Technologies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Arbitration; Supreme court; Doctrine; Dispute resolution; Power (physics); Bargaining power","score_opus":0.039452593201433975,"score_gpt":0.2707225115906738,"score_spread":0.23126991838923983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6906471903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1898753,0.0019468874,0.013077682,0.12160384,0.0007439884,0.00008427273,0.00005874562,0.00008408984,0.67252517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95881814,0.00033432888,0.0011058963,0.017813712,0.0002096647,0.00003722127,0.000009636935,0.000030207972,0.021641262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872842,0.0041100187,0.0004994783,0.0013391933,0.0038463234,0.0029207866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992912,0.0045044404,0.0006158275,0.0008211609,0.0007403799,0.00040616348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017872276,0.0002275301,0.00034921613,0.00097382674,0.01218179,0.014973634,0.001767825,0.019240556,0.004638974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01664973,0.0005634723,0.00038810069,0.0009322526,0.03993967,0.013415009,0.0058447635,0.014913297,0.00045122157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008158703,0.000009110011,0.0002801513,0.000005404889,0.0000023592766,0.00021935225,0.007603378,0.00008456862,0.00015549627,0.98557276,0.0032059322,0.0028533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035612597,0.00007998145,0.0024446612,0.00032413084,0.000032545908,0.0008812156,0.023095027,0.001654019,0.002480786,0.61301935,0.35571706,0.00023555667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066421844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08369826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066421844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015281636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010912421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13207042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912411414","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.3977272","title":"MULTILEVEL ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN A WORLD OF VANISHING TRIALS: A CONFLICT RESOLUTION PERSPECTIVE","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Adjudication; Economic Justice; Dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Perspective (graphical); Conflict resolution; Dispute mechanism","score_opus":0.21384838131481462,"score_gpt":0.3429203863510554,"score_spread":0.12907200503624075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912411414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14966244,0.0075714802,0.2552688,0.10054834,0.0004348012,0.00051732885,0.00020822047,0.00010573199,0.48568285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97815794,0.0009193925,0.01430663,0.0016944067,0.00012874855,0.0001788641,0.000026336049,0.00001784806,0.004569832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9725538,0.016014695,0.0008138429,0.002494776,0.0040866043,0.004036283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98008895,0.011661479,0.0021022675,0.0018199962,0.002085499,0.0022418213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018173208,0.00043377804,0.0009922638,0.0037070801,0.013943996,0.024046153,0.003864083,0.0051555056,0.0064970413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03291039,0.0004847437,0.0008585423,0.0033724029,0.058603335,0.012830814,0.012274755,0.0071063605,0.0003682918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004136939,0.0000091179245,0.00039154946,0.000019204028,0.0000061133287,0.00012672435,0.0051659076,0.0005001695,0.000045410412,0.99134606,0.00031600235,0.0020697156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022558525,0.000027090424,0.0011926297,0.00016477019,0.000023572105,0.0001467765,0.00960696,0.0040603164,0.00012651477,0.9556972,0.02890369,0.000027963912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07520807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06942075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07520807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026549391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02526872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19263023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6917324523","doi":"10.57660/dpceonline.2022.1745","title":"Immunita delle imprese e sviluppo globale. un male necessario? quando lo stato retrocede dalle politiche di sviluppo: comparare alcune suggestioni giurisprudenziali","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alien Tort Statute; Tort; Jurisprudence; Multinational corporation; Globalization; Jurisdiction; Statute; State (computer science); Politics; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.0439970747400966,"score_gpt":0.2918363357929415,"score_spread":0.2478392610528449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6917324523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08322863,0.014887904,0.0016226657,0.085640565,0.00073299033,0.0000338573,0.000046527293,0.00006484488,0.8137421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9300807,0.0074697733,0.0005672589,0.010096049,0.0003746813,0.00003253948,0.00004140339,0.00006281625,0.051274817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984736,0.0005988121,0.000025864698,0.00015473361,0.00026654868,0.00048049923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991929,0.00035153792,0.0001299248,0.00013089787,0.00009450293,0.00010025353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018426909,0.0002760526,0.00021063468,0.0008097682,0.0023026273,0.007901948,0.0004139665,0.002328622,0.0065267934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021805782,0.000118961856,0.00023131692,0.0008133674,0.013015577,0.005275763,0.0028457756,0.00276059,0.00066256576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012853832,0.000019183706,0.0018813295,0.00006481933,0.0000054785146,0.00021968913,0.008521238,0.000089138404,0.0002774129,0.9535362,0.010516532,0.024856066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001400499,0.00006988791,0.01168029,0.0006196076,0.00002938615,0.000517592,0.032235645,0.00020169579,0.0011897187,0.19477439,0.7586422,0.000025585583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049786093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01032615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007901948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023526195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024928984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021834314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6923593037","doi":"10.14288/1.0018309","title":"[British Columbia Court of Appeal 1992-05-27]","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; High Court; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.01386260349067849,"score_gpt":0.22179193118225868,"score_spread":0.20792932769158018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6923593037","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016465474,0.004444564,0.0005004882,0.09073991,0.007557503,0.00080825126,0.0127880275,0.0005467225,0.86614907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02867197,0.000999685,0.0003147949,0.095051646,0.000612123,0.0005370796,0.0014165175,0.00017867405,0.8722175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99198323,0.000420516,0.00027600638,0.0007739675,0.0022384624,0.0043079033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944319,0.001726859,0.0001465416,0.00036553649,0.002611506,0.0007176027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030617032,0.002244796,0.0028577226,0.004624305,0.043712165,0.021625279,0.0077646123,0.054323085,0.07616287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012672053,0.0035305023,0.0027758821,0.005402266,0.0045142756,0.003241973,0.0045411275,0.043159433,0.018280791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001810892,0.00019798904,0.0016722135,0.0001603364,0.00007032879,0.00092871074,0.0009871734,0.0004025356,0.00037769036,0.07452357,0.91302776,0.0074705365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023067335,0.000051279785,0.020762157,0.00080341863,0.00022081395,0.00022776164,0.00398753,0.00087141764,0.0007246217,0.0113223335,0.9603892,0.00040884063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96403384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07616287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.063257925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.093940124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45897055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6923707164","doi":"10.14288/1.0018298","title":"[British Columbia Court of Appeal 1992-06-17]","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; High Court; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.013898250321913042,"score_gpt":0.2218383483363445,"score_spread":0.20794009801443145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6923707164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016490528,0.0043029906,0.00048689413,0.09166732,0.0074413144,0.0007784969,0.012710293,0.00053382374,0.8655884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027635276,0.0009681633,0.00030067147,0.08781279,0.0005861012,0.00051924674,0.0013728392,0.0001689867,0.880636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920367,0.00040716687,0.0002722018,0.00076252,0.0022342196,0.004287143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99454135,0.0016392444,0.00013982701,0.00035596328,0.0026091011,0.0007145627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030235068,0.002190191,0.0028819893,0.0044749943,0.044245135,0.021900553,0.0075039016,0.053128,0.08034452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012499378,0.0034910417,0.0026809447,0.005371982,0.004471026,0.003273927,0.0046015126,0.04232121,0.018227506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001711694,0.00017781649,0.0016385653,0.00015040314,0.000068482615,0.0008782753,0.0009822719,0.00036786433,0.00034321996,0.07187939,0.9158799,0.007462578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022633736,0.00004630354,0.019458616,0.0007575111,0.0002132607,0.00021294043,0.003915881,0.00084712316,0.0006647281,0.01076079,0.9625084,0.00038810432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96532047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9360537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06394631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09663378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46396512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931644019","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6490106","title":"The development of e-mediation in Europe and in the rest of the world: comparative approach and the reasons for a double speed","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Rest (music); Work (physics); Economic Justice; Dispute resolution; Principal (computer security); Online dispute resolution","score_opus":0.05323384663917537,"score_gpt":0.2575119076096389,"score_spread":0.20427806097046353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931644019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2638754,0.1196684,0.004450749,0.01722912,0.0004831383,0.00003105632,0.000108847504,0.000020695961,0.59413266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97921365,0.014521601,0.0008741837,0.001007132,0.00010917479,0.000012951547,0.00003586286,0.000013136474,0.00421235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936615,0.0039762077,0.00028497246,0.0005105269,0.00068911695,0.0008775167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551517,0.002779674,0.0006035458,0.0004013127,0.00052449125,0.00017568155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008045505,0.00018943814,0.00033737245,0.0050380994,0.0035095334,0.011184742,0.00068851357,0.0023896212,0.003823508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006979281,0.00017215264,0.00031981617,0.008195135,0.010348726,0.010114243,0.0034175112,0.0017369626,0.00018823484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048394126,0.000030570704,0.0024846438,0.00019605231,0.000020053883,0.00043563856,0.014808885,0.00020479261,0.00014863131,0.92872137,0.0013618842,0.05153911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026771419,0.00015369216,0.04883606,0.0033685414,0.000071469745,0.0022956678,0.09760222,0.0007313206,0.0020156412,0.118632056,0.72617817,0.00008831675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00702953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068472303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011184742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004696257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00281623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042549253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6949982499","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6490956","title":"Common law runs, while civil law walks in ODR","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Balance (ability); Economic Justice; Public law; Dispute resolution; Rest (music); Sources of law","score_opus":0.01649919382551662,"score_gpt":0.19004128204481455,"score_spread":0.17354208821929792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6949982499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004150681,0.0064817825,0.006121724,0.017014764,0.0008650585,0.00002842074,0.00003864848,0.00013702233,0.96516186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30589426,0.005559291,0.003534892,0.015756464,0.0015817339,0.0000672587,0.00009867466,0.00031734377,0.66719013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659854,0.000914493,0.00012604792,0.00075821904,0.0010815689,0.00052116526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998061,0.0007567924,0.00019851042,0.00043450535,0.00035421702,0.00019506394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028528152,0.00042215458,0.00039468153,0.0016128492,0.0066602887,0.014524403,0.0010860489,0.004814212,0.018046608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049367365,0.0003131659,0.00034298873,0.0022616521,0.019778635,0.012598473,0.004923882,0.007685523,0.005663068],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018966207,0.0000048637044,0.000046646677,0.000011925462,8.1459376e-7,0.000023516053,0.0018104545,0.000033716013,0.000043738208,0.9765232,0.009769651,0.011729536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037903997,0.0000109586435,0.00019987038,0.00015358317,0.0000034032248,0.00010828176,0.0016352658,0.00011818866,0.0001373719,0.1656945,0.8319254,0.00000941082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015689187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019822128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018046608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057914294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055749193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060371935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6964292671","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5166916","title":"A Modest and Principled Proposal for Civil Justice Reform in Ontario&amp;nbsp;","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Transparency (behavior); Economic Justice; Jurisdiction; Modernization theory; Dispute resolution; Reform Act; Law reform","score_opus":0.021931535402292614,"score_gpt":0.26634671851817093,"score_spread":0.24441518311587832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6964292671","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027205117,0.0012608954,0.013972768,0.50482357,0.0037934969,0.0020382304,0.0015627758,0.0002953964,0.44504777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41314209,0.00055342907,0.021325566,0.14212203,0.0014860134,0.0018831943,0.0003750875,0.00015491349,0.41895774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825935,0.0028123797,0.0005393348,0.00241879,0.0054367613,0.0061992253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941307,0.0011629537,0.00022221294,0.00055873865,0.0023296212,0.0015957145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012747679,0.00073020265,0.0010222645,0.0014769145,0.018536126,0.012283626,0.004648407,0.03359716,0.014634959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020535214,0.0011551523,0.0016022109,0.0013093693,0.013664148,0.004635292,0.0057321596,0.018428449,0.0019017754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037668866,0.000047027206,0.0003278346,0.000049143662,0.00001596248,0.00012495724,0.0012147054,0.0004213998,0.00031024122,0.9228545,0.071084544,0.0035119783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047742756,0.0000804456,0.0061115213,0.00023977543,0.00010820906,0.000112352885,0.0020877495,0.002220578,0.0010959278,0.3452545,0.6419999,0.00021166856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7957278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8974144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20427221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.070076145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1961002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5084404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6968957033","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6490957","title":"Common law runs, while civil law walks in ODR","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Balance (ability); Economic Justice; Public law; Dispute resolution; Rest (music); Sources of law","score_opus":0.039637519719954314,"score_gpt":0.2223253099055043,"score_spread":0.18268779018554998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6968957033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004272528,0.0059933607,0.009967975,0.019767594,0.0010001975,0.00003330591,0.000050822855,0.00020810103,0.9587061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28677326,0.0051213573,0.005153252,0.019080276,0.0018010293,0.000083677194,0.00012377356,0.00043088145,0.6814325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964669,0.000886847,0.00013094385,0.0008607021,0.001174207,0.00048043206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791473,0.0008016947,0.00019742473,0.0004961626,0.00040094674,0.00018901403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003042486,0.0004591652,0.00041693426,0.0015817326,0.0061494266,0.014165672,0.0011326127,0.005345509,0.017575556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049765715,0.00034847684,0.00039094436,0.0019948066,0.01980955,0.0135909505,0.004697592,0.008142027,0.0061723576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020069222,0.0000043051896,0.000039048962,0.000010336904,8.7284076e-7,0.000020650743,0.001187585,0.000034938494,0.00004728292,0.97923934,0.008984689,0.010428859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043107134,0.000011829147,0.00018284837,0.00014050657,0.0000041727185,0.00010953563,0.0011095853,0.00015490828,0.00016827535,0.21715863,0.7809444,0.000010907856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013717176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016806303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017575556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005492938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005438512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058796108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6979746415","doi":"","title":"The ADR Movement: Theoretical Aspects and Practical Potential","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Online dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute mechanism; Mediation; Dispute board; Negotiation; Lawyer supported mediation","score_opus":0.009606335879720698,"score_gpt":0.24758519978220964,"score_spread":0.23797886390248893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6979746415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009322183,0.031764217,0.040044878,0.24348955,0.0023070334,0.00008266288,0.000049249105,0.0000740726,0.67286617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7732244,0.032564618,0.03917988,0.03036142,0.007441541,0.00074716774,0.00010794133,0.00012594636,0.11624715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926978,0.005065537,0.00014049863,0.00055091333,0.00093481166,0.00061053055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99209994,0.005622212,0.00049480115,0.0005359669,0.0006347352,0.00061223964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009207343,0.0008169121,0.0006754323,0.0026846218,0.0066735703,0.013237693,0.0037854593,0.00765433,0.012789051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00818333,0.00048765558,0.0007795822,0.0026527832,0.03579885,0.017915675,0.008561568,0.007676074,0.0018594719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002261139,0.000011146976,0.000046900277,0.000018334686,6.0575564e-7,0.000036817262,0.0005059372,0.00008448373,0.0000071364807,0.99563366,0.0016210993,0.002031534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013822996,0.000018927303,0.0001438989,0.00016998385,0.0000026471446,0.0002087671,0.0040373323,0.001878517,0.000046829537,0.8935074,0.09995836,0.000013446656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009329388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074351477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013237693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008367881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068759224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06071353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6979774293","doi":"","title":"Agreements to engage in âmed-arbâ now enforceable in Ontario","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-publications@bond (Bond University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Process (computing); Negotiation; Legislation; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.03271035378759453,"score_gpt":0.20332472351507447,"score_spread":0.17061436972747995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6979774293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048484843,0.0012411864,0.0024853847,0.026610533,0.00091505906,0.001518377,0.0045919367,0.00024597216,0.9139067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23320912,0.00061955,0.0037461603,0.008420778,0.0001960009,0.0005219846,0.0015638251,0.000058644247,0.75166404],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827481,0.00065567624,0.00072493183,0.000985722,0.010166355,0.004719199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98573893,0.0016755536,0.00049306353,0.001278829,0.009023582,0.0017900735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006218766,0.00042489555,0.00056999206,0.0014582535,0.020065488,0.005900652,0.0033303371,0.007153114,0.031222565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0123039605,0.0010391447,0.0010487325,0.0014132182,0.0033234735,0.0015136964,0.0039978316,0.0056700776,0.004104435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004357148,0.00029706254,0.02373866,0.0006410325,0.00016977344,0.0031232743,0.014123516,0.0008496788,0.0066483165,0.37926453,0.52878684,0.041921612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015796404,0.00005234748,0.03229142,0.00020284609,0.000099123434,0.00018297693,0.0021719032,0.00069130154,0.0020469816,0.0047576437,0.9572274,0.000118089665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9767447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07470251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07470251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15401146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5420072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982336448","doi":"","title":"Il regime di tassazione degli organismi di mediazione","year":2015,"lang":"it","type":"book-chapter","venue":"CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Quarter (Canadian coin); Period (music); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.08161171067447012,"score_gpt":0.26469128860246444,"score_spread":0.1830795779279943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982336448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02413713,0.004932267,0.015100583,0.011097368,0.00048498725,0.000088129564,0.00029172804,0.00014644754,0.94372135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6022314,0.007457817,0.010668653,0.0019206495,0.000670083,0.00031102003,0.00030506673,0.00024471682,0.37619057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983741,0.0003549068,0.00005776883,0.0003561856,0.00058197434,0.0002751275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985505,0.00040030482,0.00021214073,0.0004036996,0.00027325997,0.00016012734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021785744,0.00040225257,0.0002812819,0.0018225862,0.0019952452,0.009502865,0.0010150118,0.0015094437,0.022302235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032418037,0.0003024121,0.00047152213,0.0020699431,0.0060099615,0.004767537,0.0028574755,0.003484454,0.002186707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012903939,0.000021710652,0.00097134575,0.000040646293,0.0000058900373,0.000014727474,0.0014801186,0.0003564151,0.00037508298,0.96784556,0.0072192927,0.021656295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018525272,0.00005710943,0.010566185,0.00030622646,0.000018006993,0.000078902995,0.0022661043,0.0011178202,0.0010529895,0.32543388,0.65905315,0.0000310321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008394739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009357901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022302235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077197826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005445989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074608445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986413426","doi":"","title":"Penn Law Journal: An Rx to Heal Criminal Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Geopolitics; Prime minister; Quarter (Canadian coin); Criminal justice; Capital (architecture); Financial crisis; Austerity; Investment (military)","score_opus":0.03302688693906875,"score_gpt":0.2816406787246764,"score_spread":0.24861379178560766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986413426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060706947,0.031977993,0.0008637344,0.4447651,0.024202174,0.00009012686,0.00023187554,0.00032095402,0.4969411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01202253,0.013282116,0.00095490925,0.18723343,0.011784457,0.00023957461,0.0001825388,0.00027963682,0.77402085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966916,0.00086135615,0.00018396761,0.00035197363,0.0013999635,0.0005112064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99402654,0.0024746696,0.00035149895,0.00051913806,0.0012640738,0.0013640707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028251463,0.0009212655,0.00069727184,0.0019807874,0.011926648,0.015988827,0.0021182175,0.02246642,0.12204674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014606326,0.00074358383,0.0006487318,0.0012797303,0.0073702196,0.009579538,0.006747022,0.017401867,0.049106553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021708404,0.00002245136,0.00006397994,0.000032274875,0.0000018209821,0.000051082272,0.00015355968,0.000013254606,0.000022662152,0.019579496,0.9667624,0.0132949855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000390931,0.000004684815,0.0001141306,0.00023127224,0.0000015871765,0.000048767055,0.0003797506,0.000040068844,0.000019957466,0.0059571397,0.993193,0.0000057624925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013009526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027724236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12204674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004333878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013632321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.408287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986659844","doi":"","title":"The principle of procedural proportionality applied to information technologies : for a modernization in moderation of civil procedure","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Civil procedure; Modernization theory; Notice","score_opus":0.014699803217413774,"score_gpt":0.2569191654734495,"score_spread":0.24221936225603574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986659844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025657492,0.0060078204,0.3802575,0.087577194,0.0012985383,0.00030081026,0.000297933,0.00035226924,0.49825042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87554234,0.0033106427,0.06263036,0.011500348,0.0013096848,0.0007980905,0.00012554703,0.00033632043,0.044446584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772364,0.012637365,0.00085071527,0.0035742559,0.004351224,0.00134993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756192,0.012773859,0.002201364,0.0060125263,0.0027300722,0.0006629038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017995814,0.0006511854,0.0006679721,0.002011434,0.005549338,0.011379135,0.002410434,0.0055201347,0.013502759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036257274,0.00062788243,0.0014578196,0.002175139,0.0400302,0.016260961,0.0076014367,0.009762768,0.0020324294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004419039,0.0000032351168,0.000103340324,0.000018777879,0.0000032816156,0.000010060041,0.00090105337,0.000079306796,0.000039122024,0.99584466,0.00061775005,0.0023749648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019838562,0.000032563472,0.00071362214,0.00019630833,0.000019020461,0.00009555123,0.0006757821,0.0009656518,0.00051550224,0.90050864,0.09622347,0.000034142373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007060629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060489406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017995814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075780624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00920079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09517211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987763506","doi":"","title":"Transplanting class actions: A comparative analysis of the potential of canadian class actions for the Kuwaiti legal system","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Government (linguistics); World class; Class action; Control (management)","score_opus":0.03627507999353401,"score_gpt":0.259059996836784,"score_spread":0.22278491684324997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987763506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8535631,0.00054557034,0.00026433938,0.0017912283,0.000018034865,0.00009445035,0.00019235062,0.000012239481,0.14351876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99457955,0.00027093722,0.00011192214,0.00010800567,0.000002873646,0.000015404721,0.00005737418,0.000005535728,0.004848441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99541414,0.00046621135,0.00008155274,0.00020737108,0.0010688386,0.0027619237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927423,0.0017408659,0.0007301319,0.00037260418,0.0030697486,0.0013443526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002579774,0.00025505092,0.00042911724,0.004575113,0.01855416,0.008581862,0.0023262326,0.0017202827,0.010450435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012609094,0.00026976527,0.00048336966,0.0080811605,0.0076989797,0.002580293,0.0034038448,0.0021728375,0.00031206582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076322135,0.00032301547,0.18917304,0.00021957792,0.00013199166,0.0012827027,0.11081666,0.0038706094,0.0013370194,0.5830234,0.0131645715,0.09589418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008194142,0.00013049073,0.59482193,0.00029286198,0.00030823905,0.00023048201,0.30561632,0.004389523,0.00091147877,0.01033262,0.08273245,0.00015169778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9900457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.123353496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.123353496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08672333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89499646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987774711","doi":"","title":"Understanding Canada/ United States Dairy Disputes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Work (physics); Negotiation","score_opus":0.09570928770347142,"score_gpt":0.23942276864748507,"score_spread":0.14371348094401365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987774711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12715971,0.004659908,0.008223407,0.06483162,0.00022531886,0.000079212565,0.0005442337,0.000056948127,0.7942197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96302706,0.0023187487,0.0027546815,0.0023638192,0.000056020494,0.00002741618,0.00020269622,0.000034528104,0.02921502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967914,0.0006767206,0.000088465065,0.00027163303,0.0008891076,0.0012827519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955237,0.0019153355,0.00038767073,0.0001708053,0.0015328793,0.00046958675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041138385,0.0004582249,0.0004242856,0.0031295056,0.015493774,0.02112498,0.0025867317,0.004611739,0.012672937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009850261,0.00033673365,0.00046941816,0.0043190923,0.011798941,0.0069882525,0.0031603184,0.0038933817,0.0005828347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024901732,0.000029693703,0.004180545,0.0000630358,0.000011960203,0.00029884573,0.035055704,0.002374859,0.00012059454,0.91574264,0.020180574,0.021916598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028245617,0.0000106670395,0.010324829,0.00046520345,0.00004561732,0.00016705212,0.20828392,0.0069146026,0.0003090528,0.38631973,0.3870754,0.00005567711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97631514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.980906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089807265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.089807265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09467917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65160036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989622706","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Approach to Fundamental Rights Disputes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ELTE Digital Institutional Repository (EDIT) (Eötvös Loránd University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fundamental rights; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Legislature","score_opus":0.01542273942708961,"score_gpt":0.18885805986124626,"score_spread":0.17343532043415666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989622706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031883144,0.0030628052,0.0053187218,0.023281885,0.0003556043,0.000038499875,0.00013212788,0.000036655194,0.96458536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5705941,0.010563673,0.014625374,0.008400456,0.00049930793,0.00021028456,0.000209309,0.0001596528,0.39473784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98920023,0.002344266,0.0002644887,0.0010167192,0.0048438646,0.0023303914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99526864,0.0013591575,0.00015373691,0.00041528448,0.0022688245,0.00053430046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00496228,0.00095051486,0.0009507517,0.008186407,0.025163058,0.01841986,0.00367694,0.0068861963,0.025607014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013786091,0.0008462201,0.00095871737,0.009548773,0.027782794,0.008203879,0.004957818,0.00876594,0.0014135116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000247868,0.0000024497326,0.000032236723,0.000008916797,0.0000013705802,0.000013645867,0.00058831694,0.00012723466,0.0000063465286,0.9915324,0.0053002588,0.0023843467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019293135,0.0000043221826,0.0005424275,0.00021349211,0.000017830986,0.000092902315,0.0024147283,0.0010470677,0.00006716347,0.63683605,0.35869545,0.00004927868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9648485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9688796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14571387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14571387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14266121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989869268","doi":"","title":"Civil litigation in a globalising world","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research Publications (Maastricht University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Law Foundation of Nova Scotia","funders":"","keywords":"Civil litigation; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.09524578079319325,"score_gpt":0.29475832399469054,"score_spread":0.1995125432014973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989869268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022775775,0.024940275,0.0004924771,0.01451741,0.0005524792,0.0000123506225,0.00003486806,0.00002606426,0.95714647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13809827,0.029561792,0.0011842691,0.008118993,0.0017661974,0.000061168175,0.0002025068,0.00014150297,0.8208652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763656,0.000619331,0.000072986266,0.00022745704,0.0008426549,0.0006010776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867404,0.0006550219,0.00009975782,0.00014078106,0.0002444173,0.00018603315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015932287,0.00072044897,0.00058808614,0.002178276,0.005691501,0.019153392,0.001192003,0.007954447,0.040820908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038043857,0.00038436573,0.00039801325,0.0046833563,0.008316994,0.007445046,0.0041612303,0.0039960835,0.006194795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006611191,0.000027541693,0.0001246124,0.00006413182,0.0000045166644,0.00017312882,0.0023175087,0.0003295949,0.000078916964,0.7999868,0.1479929,0.048893742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005294294,0.000009150564,0.0005938964,0.0003410346,0.0000057161174,0.00020692499,0.002391617,0.00012691774,0.0000825701,0.18011583,0.8161102,0.000010781938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01961558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039719395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040820908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006789855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007281701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13655949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991024956","doi":"","title":"Ethics, Justice, and the Impact of COVID-19 on the Courts in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Diafiltration; Liquation; Proteogenomics; Fusible alloy; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.0388985017698709,"score_gpt":0.2584177788732932,"score_spread":0.2195192771034223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991024956","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30824268,0.018555753,0.00084729126,0.39013523,0.0010996411,0.00008040187,0.0001887238,0.00003610067,0.28081423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96353555,0.003978127,0.00032090629,0.013531361,0.00013118946,0.000013373377,0.000028190629,0.000017875736,0.018443476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851769,0.0021714265,0.00027762822,0.0006448156,0.0043833237,0.007345946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97627026,0.0063962042,0.0013539202,0.00032063946,0.008011703,0.0076472126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007866901,0.0002670677,0.0005278803,0.0018893542,0.047519,0.017970871,0.0022569161,0.005551294,0.0059424774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02268323,0.0004773276,0.00035772912,0.0030426043,0.026190434,0.0028443458,0.00508463,0.008187034,0.00020456054],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000876675,0.00010177679,0.023252573,0.00017954987,0.000055209104,0.0015645094,0.062215075,0.0018179833,0.0005180105,0.78356105,0.08350717,0.0431394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008337985,0.00010055313,0.108642265,0.0012615359,0.0001414071,0.00041655544,0.14733115,0.0027846887,0.0011209797,0.08545492,0.652203,0.00045957667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99638003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30911282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.30911282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37154502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8013312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991975755","doi":"","title":"Investment in access to justice more than pays for itself, report finds","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Investment (military); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.027717434106363337,"score_gpt":0.2878329135644825,"score_spread":0.26011547945811914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991975755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057850196,0.0012366553,0.00027566706,0.15542729,0.004820163,0.00006976067,0.0011026419,0.00022249534,0.8310604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05596342,0.0013482188,0.000365898,0.07911014,0.002417352,0.00014502293,0.0005794603,0.00020168841,0.85986876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472624,0.00045777386,0.00014892415,0.00036329913,0.0027944457,0.0015092749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99476975,0.001636235,0.00028375475,0.00045056068,0.0018342456,0.0010253887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030546335,0.00036660998,0.000417353,0.001139744,0.0070241373,0.011290326,0.0009571926,0.009242649,0.060543276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019072948,0.00037263503,0.00046474944,0.0012198462,0.0021308793,0.0041801096,0.0023171802,0.006548068,0.012727715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002713854,0.000044746575,0.0019666876,0.000056841734,0.000013042938,0.00013455881,0.0009570986,0.000037256465,0.0003703607,0.09420228,0.8830149,0.019175226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010626838,0.000034988145,0.008374809,0.00016499803,0.00003129126,0.00008473307,0.0036275086,0.00005801733,0.0005041239,0.007985933,0.9790992,0.00002373563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17031923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3242376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17031923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005633632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02407414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3386557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992055563","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Symposium: Alternative Dispute Resolution in Canada-United States Trade Relations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute mechanism; Online dispute resolution; Context (archaeology); Dispute board; International trade law","score_opus":0.009656281784352965,"score_gpt":0.2225326067050618,"score_spread":0.21287632492070885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992055563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045814714,0.11156268,0.0042987317,0.17053479,0.11660463,0.0003891659,0.0011190596,0.0002312016,0.5906782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09806887,0.12803388,0.0038936904,0.057687204,0.061536815,0.00033623536,0.001233631,0.00029518563,0.64891446],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989498,0.0001677482,0.000053546974,0.00009998855,0.00046346348,0.00026542798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986902,0.00024994777,0.000035232977,0.00002968383,0.0007084397,0.00028649223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012497427,0.0008117665,0.0005670087,0.0022548845,0.010573516,0.007420972,0.0016990912,0.0046645207,0.03604735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020956874,0.00034965188,0.00074242335,0.0028548546,0.0034242675,0.0028225794,0.0018645293,0.005746668,0.0042115883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019859182,0.0000423591,0.00025537697,0.00019260473,0.00000434082,0.00019487027,0.0016880466,0.0002954274,0.00033347897,0.05020628,0.9218665,0.02490076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023907317,0.000007978199,0.00066728925,0.0002455017,0.0000039300744,0.000058581143,0.0008487569,0.0000853211,0.00005244649,0.0029143193,0.99510115,0.000012413195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55455536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7639427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44544464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02541002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02382224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8961359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992089315","doi":"","title":"La funzione consultiva delle Corti Supreme in prospettiva comparata. La peculiare procedura di reference nell’esperienza canadese","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Florence Research (University of Florence)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Statutory law; Order (exchange); Power (physics); Normative","score_opus":0.07779870692889455,"score_gpt":0.2935307994828049,"score_spread":0.21573209255391035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992089315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016075484,0.0077400003,0.0025060934,0.020612767,0.0011004986,0.000026998576,0.00019513065,0.000103258615,0.9516397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7037174,0.0042726514,0.0021186408,0.007310311,0.0008081962,0.000043964446,0.00023376824,0.00022969737,0.2812653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923057,0.0013379819,0.00013630794,0.0013901293,0.002797792,0.0020320702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995226,0.0017357304,0.00020877356,0.00071913906,0.0015797329,0.0005305855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003300795,0.0004230181,0.00041311164,0.002759997,0.012127474,0.016752949,0.0016596927,0.0038783797,0.014835615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010316905,0.00038226292,0.00042885082,0.0039054577,0.011226025,0.005185677,0.003288022,0.0055640726,0.0019097986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009833821,0.0000066020402,0.0004629352,0.000030465833,0.000005860407,0.000116860014,0.005147115,0.00008238911,0.00012669426,0.95381844,0.027820652,0.01237217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052005526,0.000011783596,0.0031333228,0.00015979122,0.000015598807,0.00010144102,0.0041246223,0.00028806698,0.00036436616,0.056504052,0.9352596,0.000032069987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45708317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6726805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54291683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026768519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021381047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9088453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992119317","doi":"","title":"Judging in the Time of a Pandemic:The Impact of COVID-19 on Bail and Sentencing in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Public health; China; Government (linguistics); Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pneumonia","score_opus":0.01911707497827093,"score_gpt":0.22210499262992783,"score_spread":0.2029879176516569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992119317","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10576365,0.0124883745,0.00060862914,0.59820807,0.00446746,0.00027033765,0.0015165509,0.00011874546,0.27655825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6762462,0.012761462,0.0013352344,0.1887453,0.0007370293,0.00011131957,0.0008961126,0.00014868657,0.1190186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871688,0.0008267104,0.0003411588,0.00059937336,0.0058096666,0.005254363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98034465,0.0034629595,0.0006284711,0.0002714423,0.0073578763,0.007934546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048792064,0.00041073462,0.0005553209,0.0017928452,0.037073273,0.013311219,0.004616035,0.006569304,0.009735953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025687374,0.00065919734,0.0006784788,0.0030539727,0.00727136,0.0031480885,0.005052612,0.01624848,0.00063083717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017652364,0.00013187424,0.030461896,0.00027637903,0.000077715405,0.004528101,0.025297035,0.0009614908,0.00060093775,0.13303398,0.73759484,0.06685923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012566787,0.00011381397,0.09446175,0.0010731831,0.00014139408,0.000810926,0.081392065,0.0018965774,0.00091575895,0.01018643,0.80845326,0.00042922024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2126432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2126432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4038395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91322225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998370182","doi":"","title":"Access to Justice in Canada:\\nThe Unrepresented Accused and the Role of the Trial Judge","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insecta mundi","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Economic Justice; Obligation; Paragraph; Pace; Administration of justice","score_opus":0.03130633496261244,"score_gpt":0.23869664470359775,"score_spread":0.20739030974098532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998370182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13446139,0.032485034,0.0020085503,0.37220004,0.0020634648,0.0001985223,0.0010814228,0.00016030621,0.4553412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85496175,0.00975347,0.0011219406,0.047008295,0.00036950107,0.000079316174,0.00023706301,0.000086838714,0.086381875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859465,0.001212119,0.00032139127,0.0009274372,0.003936223,0.00765646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850578,0.003014059,0.0006478338,0.00032263884,0.004965198,0.0059925206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005860472,0.00040131685,0.0006054008,0.0022437996,0.039994486,0.015400651,0.0033515908,0.009316088,0.014669995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023267193,0.000748942,0.00047454977,0.003622095,0.014648821,0.003839588,0.0067943167,0.010054144,0.0008433697],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018583893,0.0001118311,0.017689472,0.00040310234,0.00006030781,0.0031903503,0.04062271,0.00067988236,0.0006737717,0.50999385,0.331121,0.095268026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016943838,0.000097692646,0.07751125,0.0015692076,0.00016918908,0.0009647318,0.06445337,0.0023658653,0.000745208,0.06352006,0.78796786,0.00046609604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99715567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17032224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17032224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37658605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9623086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000852309","doi":"","title":"Glenn Zakaib on Multijurisdictional Class Actions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; New class","score_opus":0.023962406913264633,"score_gpt":0.2558052635656317,"score_spread":0.2318428566523671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000852309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009171872,0.017515432,0.0024842527,0.3796812,0.0048805727,0.00007187391,0.0001245156,0.000053887834,0.5860163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2981519,0.01465141,0.0018042934,0.28036934,0.0024962157,0.00015871967,0.0000637431,0.00014586211,0.40215853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99324787,0.001458978,0.00017485203,0.0006549654,0.002216659,0.0022466148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951616,0.002548325,0.00016804956,0.00017355244,0.0013181629,0.00063032086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056733447,0.00040434557,0.0005070698,0.0009755958,0.02452554,0.012855769,0.0022113454,0.013122341,0.010402614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00994867,0.0004308365,0.00043317807,0.0012162344,0.011637501,0.0054103215,0.0045857923,0.01222941,0.0013024204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001597982,0.000020838492,0.0009385429,0.0000346446,0.000005752214,0.00022020555,0.0034990371,0.00023161767,0.00010131779,0.64886695,0.33004642,0.016018761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016053007,0.000012349525,0.001759454,0.00040361276,0.000015467012,0.00007723822,0.005541363,0.00037503545,0.00027728896,0.051658433,0.93981487,0.000048835398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52122515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7135759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52122515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01640448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03205533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9631889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001479198","doi":"","title":"La funzione consultiva delle Corti negli ordinamenti anglosassoni","year":2007,"lang":"it","type":"book","venue":"Research Padua  Archive (University of Padua)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diction; Treasury; Medieval history","score_opus":0.061457576478985435,"score_gpt":0.2935388288454676,"score_spread":0.2320812523664822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001479198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49127758,0.01102402,0.015351768,0.038810443,0.0016623436,0.0006637511,0.0019384649,0.00025749273,0.43901414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88647205,0.0051585813,0.007282145,0.006344924,0.00027525975,0.000331682,0.00064728595,0.00008082957,0.0934072],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681133,0.0013016202,0.0001268432,0.00040757412,0.0007219857,0.0006306298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953934,0.0012644305,0.00096049975,0.00058912893,0.0013248665,0.00046770726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029466306,0.00048325074,0.0004896949,0.0010008333,0.0016810282,0.004655132,0.0010165268,0.00109387,0.028773017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074260808,0.00028408237,0.00062627654,0.0012568365,0.0015690961,0.0018649315,0.002326962,0.0018135365,0.0031563714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011449507,0.0011526899,0.2603177,0.002400208,0.00049902074,0.0012789863,0.025320461,0.0051529245,0.008989749,0.09922614,0.07379603,0.52072114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114386785,0.0015260474,0.26246426,0.002596419,0.0005390066,0.0011499076,0.03848087,0.0053855577,0.0042182845,0.024263803,0.659026,0.00023539731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08054191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16588955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08054191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004058522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064046797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16014618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001589912","doi":"","title":"La rinegoziazione del contratto per imprevision nel diritto civile del Quebec: il caso Churchill Falls (Labrador) Ltd v. Hydro-Quebec.","year":2024,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Constitution; Civil rights; Context (archaeology); Common law; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.010540408841195066,"score_gpt":0.21946333872301002,"score_spread":0.20892292988181496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001589912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071633175,0.036989987,0.002872495,0.2504329,0.002117621,0.00021741797,0.0024449027,0.000140498,0.63315105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5883752,0.005538628,0.001236218,0.03710976,0.00019543775,0.000076723576,0.00038142802,0.00009699925,0.36698964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995093,0.00065412244,0.000127523,0.0005977818,0.0020998197,0.0014277903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545777,0.00081556354,0.00029041013,0.0002273136,0.002597791,0.00061126356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025426198,0.00050441746,0.00031753362,0.0014693219,0.012515603,0.00934838,0.0021024963,0.006809915,0.016363444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00584858,0.00050975697,0.00050650456,0.0023327465,0.007006071,0.0030673891,0.0019825085,0.0076226927,0.0010417422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011032012,0.000055053242,0.01078554,0.0002192758,0.00005803286,0.00089926826,0.012642416,0.00037177018,0.0008635248,0.548765,0.38909814,0.03613165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056431305,0.00003755133,0.030394394,0.00035813503,0.00008331668,0.00018010446,0.007969988,0.00051670894,0.00093437533,0.009142453,0.9501662,0.00016028923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101434626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.101434626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.111464955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73596317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001812441","doi":"","title":"Low-Income Litigants in the Sandbox: Court Record Data and the Legal Technology A2J Market","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Debt; Settlement (finance); Consumer debt; Summons; State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Class action","score_opus":0.013747368035118054,"score_gpt":0.24899636820682688,"score_spread":0.23524900017170883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001812441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05530381,0.0069701723,0.0020433236,0.28052852,0.0019117525,0.0001461518,0.02578707,0.0013417937,0.6259674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51812935,0.010759503,0.004230992,0.07093519,0.004354666,0.0003829426,0.023176273,0.0014305626,0.3666005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970489,0.00070476765,0.00019566389,0.00024984134,0.0013565476,0.00044429454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742537,0.016457729,0.0024025722,0.0009711779,0.0031981473,0.0027165941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033485945,0.00017563635,0.00027237888,0.002881966,0.0054655825,0.009566314,0.0012868195,0.0029301876,0.097509764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026128378,0.00031620893,0.00030929584,0.004797812,0.0014774173,0.008435809,0.0027757923,0.0026791173,0.016531099],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028277162,0.00006403946,0.009353378,0.00007139608,0.00000525552,0.00058782136,0.002942948,0.000060181585,0.00009150031,0.01629739,0.9268279,0.04366998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022500837,0.000031525135,0.054579344,0.00058455626,0.000017893168,0.0008208974,0.019312602,0.0006367836,0.00016562962,0.00943586,0.91433185,0.00006058517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055562526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1388465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097509764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023568347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042547267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3262027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008035902","doi":"","title":"Attack of the Bots: How Fraud Threatens the Integrity of Class Action Settlements","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Human settlement; Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Settlement (finance); Liability","score_opus":0.0417926327093201,"score_gpt":0.2822480378615896,"score_spread":0.24045540515226949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008035902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22064738,0.001806272,0.03712383,0.106533594,0.00074062654,0.00013978296,0.00022170779,0.0004269397,0.6323598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775279,0.0003459808,0.0020993145,0.002471061,0.00015203605,0.00003555692,0.000030000921,0.00007939759,0.017258612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.989447,0.005342295,0.00024378311,0.00081295654,0.002251045,0.0019028584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746953,0.01430833,0.002237895,0.004122945,0.0031194438,0.0015161363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010712161,0.00032827616,0.0006258785,0.002414779,0.010484004,0.015906265,0.002495239,0.010374313,0.016809857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05352872,0.0005430373,0.00072446425,0.001620991,0.011858679,0.014545288,0.007226805,0.008228405,0.0027195483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013927683,0.000094585346,0.004547427,0.00003426347,0.00003138701,0.00066090655,0.009440152,0.002051196,0.0004885663,0.9266008,0.028354108,0.027557388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008443167,0.000083066254,0.0039395033,0.00022915978,0.000082565995,0.0005904793,0.012754615,0.023481475,0.001470026,0.82138616,0.13581064,0.000087999906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015897458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011272534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016809857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004249314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061079073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05665201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008435145","doi":"","title":"Authorized Managerialism Under the Federal Rules – And the Extent of Convergence With Civil-Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Managerialism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Settlement (finance); Promotion (chess); Control (management); Convergence (economics); Civil procedure","score_opus":0.012947657822311479,"score_gpt":0.22697601108728743,"score_spread":0.21402835326497596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008435145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8200323,0.0012526884,0.0027586597,0.009430636,0.00003457959,0.000022987066,0.000029589533,0.00003123773,0.16640724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99919015,0.00004320969,0.00014364862,0.00011917512,0.00001941464,0.000004656928,0.0000072070156,0.0000021700905,0.00047039115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97961915,0.009960446,0.000843249,0.0024754677,0.004739324,0.0023623826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97302395,0.011003944,0.007833258,0.0030385256,0.0033930838,0.0017072483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011900049,0.00011800772,0.00031072542,0.0028228518,0.004518683,0.008774707,0.0010375788,0.0015375444,0.0029303925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03787496,0.0002393564,0.0001924083,0.0020736745,0.015186645,0.009106224,0.005745641,0.0025119772,0.00028780408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018503242,0.00014015869,0.13199781,0.00008004942,0.000040116865,0.00029547155,0.11793191,0.00069457403,0.0013624764,0.67157245,0.0015512372,0.07414869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044880544,0.00042541878,0.60587853,0.0005720117,0.000038638045,0.0008363455,0.07905073,0.002863549,0.002430724,0.24627212,0.061491992,0.000095032774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043997513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051962035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011900049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054219067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002673839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06293422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009200527","doi":"","title":"Dispute resolution institute honouring retiring Ontario Chief Justice is set to launch","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Dispute resolution; Tribute; Service (business); Politics; Alternative dispute resolution","score_opus":0.022319826264940744,"score_gpt":0.2396076828150607,"score_spread":0.21728785655011995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009200527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055074613,0.004107502,0.001352943,0.06918022,0.0067397435,0.00047374977,0.0020353051,0.00086371123,0.9097393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018869149,0.0012698175,0.0010996945,0.009332015,0.0006007839,0.00009061575,0.0011428132,0.00017446133,0.96742076],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888391,0.0003958997,0.00025833282,0.00080691633,0.0060806745,0.003619046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787386,0.0005651731,0.00047523068,0.0008650794,0.010710878,0.008645059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042894767,0.0006187753,0.0005910691,0.0016608537,0.022921098,0.010837392,0.0022348238,0.0052082706,0.146948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008903545,0.00076699007,0.0007475858,0.0014042725,0.0037639595,0.002262598,0.0057064886,0.0055245785,0.030986357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023209737,0.000027020766,0.0011612789,0.000058738813,0.000005106868,0.00017342184,0.00059833704,0.000032143635,0.00036100415,0.013424538,0.9691897,0.014945478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007499649,0.000007734645,0.0018289058,0.0000293484,0.0000026554292,0.000025888561,0.00040260013,0.000032316017,0.00010318536,0.00024729525,0.9973002,0.000012394631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91724277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97030973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.146948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065997764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19602391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49159002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009600520","doi":"","title":"Electronic Commerce - A Practitioner's Guide Edited by Alan M. Gahtan, Martin P.J. Kratz, and J. Fraser Mann (Toronto: Thomson Carwell, 2003)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Statute","score_opus":0.007153366414982874,"score_gpt":0.23497769141248184,"score_spread":0.22782432499749897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009600520","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009908839,0.5721444,0.038018458,0.053893756,0.008917947,0.00059487607,0.004743646,0.0023230955,0.31837296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0064544715,0.5409827,0.052131385,0.0138746565,0.0032135227,0.000538336,0.0044476343,0.0010787738,0.37727848],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998485,0.0003102159,0.00020938412,0.00013977085,0.0007823625,0.00007325742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969663,0.0013173313,0.00017644122,0.00024393047,0.0010750294,0.00022096733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023571374,0.0023107138,0.0018506029,0.006575422,0.0019925968,0.005524922,0.0019360597,0.0038429035,0.02895351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036375194,0.0018436102,0.0005611107,0.009483317,0.0022080264,0.0089675365,0.0022058024,0.00565814,0.047344144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058454875,0.0000273701,0.0001037971,0.00042718163,0.0000033782017,0.00010873684,0.00054428267,0.00021876204,0.0001887455,0.01256195,0.8479467,0.13786325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019137121,0.0000060755438,0.00028441768,0.0006307188,0.0000014014815,0.0001917565,0.00026528523,0.00006488186,0.00003213828,0.00413759,0.99437594,0.000007927927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01319185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030857962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02895351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002155019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006219008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09685916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009736183","doi":"","title":"Enforcement and Enforceability: Tradition and Reform","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Law Foundation of Nova Scotia","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Demotion","score_opus":0.017264978717964577,"score_gpt":0.2162626694661455,"score_spread":0.1989976907481809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009736183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016287532,0.0759606,0.0529151,0.08604718,0.001702846,0.000072101764,0.00013562909,0.00011827929,0.76676077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.870611,0.033257116,0.010438477,0.008888932,0.0043249307,0.00035625903,0.00009133552,0.00021547599,0.07181647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927609,0.002893552,0.0003901652,0.001333632,0.0019312073,0.0006905388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98543143,0.009992409,0.00095460593,0.0022078508,0.0011555064,0.00025823727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0097958995,0.00086230243,0.0012015972,0.002475364,0.005590508,0.016794283,0.0023777278,0.008493676,0.0073243696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017813906,0.0007354996,0.0006359572,0.0050460417,0.07522088,0.019407231,0.0039821165,0.0107930815,0.000806117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024312947,0.0000067010524,0.000028216116,0.00000930916,0.0000011747904,0.0000052881887,0.0002566872,0.000095295174,0.0000050057924,0.99592113,0.0011923757,0.0024762738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074593845,0.000003481736,0.00007796064,0.000085170526,0.0000023285693,0.000012579977,0.00024268011,0.00032957373,0.00003891263,0.9795855,0.019608544,0.0000057999027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014405532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008513774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016794283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009475431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009726046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06874937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010148851","doi":"","title":"Giudice costituzionale e trasparenza: un binomio sempre piu ricorrente","year":2020,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Florence Research (University of Florence)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Duty; Context (archaeology); Constitutional law","score_opus":0.10197048666357006,"score_gpt":0.27559734492548876,"score_spread":0.1736268582619187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010148851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05748137,0.02988192,0.04354652,0.1885619,0.0017519789,0.00010500831,0.00016350721,0.00013368878,0.67837405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95116967,0.0066768453,0.0051536555,0.0074904514,0.0007624425,0.000071611896,0.000047086753,0.00011332555,0.028514875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840252,0.0059506698,0.00033885578,0.0018178606,0.005208653,0.0026586622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98898053,0.0062600933,0.0009624782,0.001547041,0.0016808634,0.0005689588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009648764,0.0005493263,0.0008294078,0.0027079247,0.009691593,0.023262924,0.0017796449,0.004979866,0.0056998995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017706733,0.00028086948,0.0005782769,0.0039516836,0.044659648,0.011611834,0.0062139705,0.0075953775,0.0005790946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004524644,0.0000035717894,0.00025864894,0.0000323584,0.000004413453,0.000028130844,0.0043660915,0.00010332719,0.00006761844,0.9868667,0.0028129786,0.0054516583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012728669,0.0000261436,0.003195317,0.00044699607,0.000030730687,0.00016602906,0.012057885,0.0007031806,0.0006084244,0.5857166,0.39697912,0.000056878947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10777063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11595669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10777063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025548078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02769762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21428663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010187652","doi":"","title":"I Click, You Click, We all Click - But Do We Have a Contract? A Case Comment on Aspenceri.com v. Paysystems","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Order (exchange); Certainty; Jurisprudence; Consistency (knowledge bases); Corporation; Legal certainty; Subject (documents); Legal risk","score_opus":0.028895842536910136,"score_gpt":0.2667428801329847,"score_spread":0.23784703759607456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010187652","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021568332,0.0014734662,0.0013870404,0.5767647,0.0022941544,0.000110839115,0.0004066885,0.0001405459,0.3958542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24031447,0.0013234136,0.00083122303,0.4529979,0.0013574805,0.00011268734,0.00020850998,0.00007946076,0.30277482],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933628,0.0007674505,0.0001966871,0.00070444494,0.0027217355,0.0022468618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952917,0.0024578709,0.00018479073,0.00017775236,0.0013197717,0.00056822033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003719734,0.00058531814,0.00048471647,0.0011104764,0.026483798,0.007583853,0.0030755363,0.028151605,0.024150917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0091232015,0.00074903417,0.0010143989,0.0014075548,0.006524916,0.0038537194,0.002020476,0.020258201,0.002737909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052078733,0.000056978217,0.002292119,0.00003712604,0.000011427857,0.0021822683,0.0042506014,0.00015870768,0.0002835126,0.298045,0.685082,0.0075482116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054459997,0.000083079205,0.0071127075,0.00019611517,0.00006107315,0.0012170788,0.009948302,0.0013051529,0.0011381097,0.018268952,0.9604126,0.00020234518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6728404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7537059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6728404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020845242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020465286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6581726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010558373","doi":"","title":"Introduction: Overview of Canada/U.S. Dispute Management and Settlement: Where We Are in Terms of Successes and Failures","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Government (linguistics); Dispute board; Dispute mechanism; Online dispute resolution; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.008485221382349492,"score_gpt":0.20509508746696517,"score_spread":0.19660986608461567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010558373","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001943234,0.72002363,0.003772058,0.042210273,0.006698058,0.00016002184,0.005254965,0.00037542733,0.21956232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02645526,0.8307235,0.006924233,0.018577348,0.006802437,0.00011192994,0.0046770773,0.00021485434,0.1055134],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982881,0.00013325395,0.00008173276,0.00017623256,0.0009979876,0.00032270336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953009,0.0005988732,0.00025559813,0.00007702215,0.003291499,0.00047620572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018863506,0.0009051757,0.0006705927,0.010222694,0.0045809643,0.009673207,0.0019666634,0.0023438726,0.022550942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033248872,0.00053583854,0.00053128024,0.02248699,0.0028382377,0.003893215,0.0015494609,0.002658833,0.005137707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002206408,0.000041897467,0.0018104609,0.0014639434,0.000011351008,0.00006745114,0.0006592915,0.00074956723,0.00015819691,0.06843029,0.73845714,0.1881284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012167116,0.000005854402,0.0027981806,0.0008857213,0.0000055674927,0.00005062344,0.0003127754,0.00007711905,0.000030302095,0.0028847205,0.99293584,0.000012151155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8559502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8998885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96406364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03593638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05315148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2897963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7012643363","doi":"","title":"Civil Procedure","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Research Publications (Maastricht University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Law Foundation of Nova Scotia","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.1135063002529504,"score_gpt":0.2847040599935631,"score_spread":0.1711977597406127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7012643363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005504909,0.0014351754,0.0007645226,0.0012893374,0.0002457341,0.000032074822,0.00016395541,0.000069097325,0.9954496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0128027955,0.0007100027,0.00044034104,0.0008621056,0.00016526233,0.000050661438,0.00016908029,0.00007506636,0.9847247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981104,0.00044477262,0.00007950225,0.0003125978,0.0007184975,0.00033423182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992797,0.00019940839,0.000034993274,0.00022888683,0.00020161182,0.000055497054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013463617,0.00070855673,0.0005877362,0.0018716129,0.0050014346,0.0066405125,0.0014142583,0.0036025094,0.18162978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035706635,0.0004437962,0.00046201042,0.0018947357,0.0037573483,0.0025505533,0.0026896785,0.0032164766,0.06706864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014513578,0.000026068272,0.000085676635,0.000049952774,0.0000031208249,0.00005328527,0.0007616369,0.00008671385,0.00015317638,0.74055946,0.2098936,0.04831275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003760635,0.000005951083,0.000233118,0.000060462087,0.00000249231,0.000051051727,0.00018867095,0.00004583174,0.0001549148,0.042504597,0.9567447,0.0000045523784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019815462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031235304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18162978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004441695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041961684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60761213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014964680","doi":"","title":"The SCC's Dilemma: What to Do with Interveners?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); State (computer science); Supreme court; Order (exchange); Simple (philosophy)","score_opus":0.013558149424980839,"score_gpt":0.24085763534448995,"score_spread":0.2272994859195091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014964680","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014470252,0.002975752,0.002229339,0.97746867,0.0015264507,0.000035571622,0.000021238497,0.000023621058,0.0142722605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15196535,0.0072656726,0.0058157016,0.8120401,0.0075056385,0.00033316723,0.000056645156,0.00014655256,0.014871215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.954967,0.02410183,0.0021524408,0.0051216604,0.008328869,0.005328204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89303267,0.07381243,0.0034265232,0.0027000983,0.011281784,0.0157465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07356506,0.0009012514,0.0020008057,0.0030535008,0.02194066,0.018993028,0.008074486,0.047179237,0.0146632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13383318,0.0008440189,0.0017211525,0.0024298204,0.056583226,0.033890262,0.011662912,0.04699755,0.003235934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063377614,0.00011040432,0.0026943954,0.00027804176,0.000047309375,0.0012301696,0.0105403755,0.00037335584,0.00010433867,0.69084525,0.23952398,0.054189023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013495554,0.00006371457,0.0010406382,0.0018680155,0.0000529601,0.00092874275,0.02912046,0.0008279054,0.0001744555,0.72232103,0.24337833,0.0000887535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034455106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0399989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07356506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012828108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38905388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015728543","doi":"","title":"Toronto van attack trial, verdict gave glimpse into new reality of virtual court cases","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Verdict; High Court; Blame; Virtual reality","score_opus":0.03580952295145073,"score_gpt":0.29236753474583493,"score_spread":0.2565580117943842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015728543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01925019,0.004759023,0.0022049425,0.33918837,0.011661651,0.000108094224,0.001732266,0.00027826402,0.6208171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25865814,0.002501364,0.0017094268,0.08197978,0.0030195813,0.000101373385,0.0006857759,0.00025096064,0.65109366],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973074,0.0005904701,0.000093423354,0.00031991868,0.0010754311,0.00061330677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633396,0.0017157795,0.00009237193,0.00024285013,0.0008838825,0.0007311163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025188026,0.00047475428,0.0003960806,0.0014205059,0.015447714,0.014041304,0.0017205168,0.012034215,0.024738744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011479895,0.00061893516,0.00067776145,0.0011109944,0.0064726765,0.0030719799,0.0024536257,0.013013506,0.0027089021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046807396,0.000014070289,0.00072339975,0.000032520766,0.000018894862,0.00049458764,0.0016940057,0.00033802784,0.00018965459,0.19202402,0.7947824,0.0096415775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060111328,0.00004370365,0.00669144,0.0001834629,0.000048863916,0.00012540052,0.0047687558,0.000960936,0.00053774385,0.033733167,0.95273405,0.00011230585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6843153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9309583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31568468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025105901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016043993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6350876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7016108176","doi":"","title":"Перезавантаженість судів України: причини, наслідки та шляхи вирішення","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Legislation; Dispute resolution; Legislature; Procedural justice; Mediation; Judicial review; Procedural law; Online dispute resolution","score_opus":0.05334074681387788,"score_gpt":0.31982756725953315,"score_spread":0.26648682044565525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7016108176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12774454,0.02910825,0.12102162,0.011786925,0.0017274659,0.00034517076,0.0006423896,0.000676437,0.7069472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8054482,0.02000462,0.07923999,0.0006072884,0.00042611384,0.00027582637,0.00028277957,0.00025193224,0.09346331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985474,0.00037205406,0.00010877898,0.00021254996,0.0006028141,0.00015642348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991549,0.0002429615,0.00014090353,0.00014505845,0.00024182648,0.00007440228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015483857,0.00038169432,0.0003151315,0.0021692282,0.002256665,0.004689243,0.00054405665,0.0010816426,0.011061353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020997329,0.0004966896,0.00036727954,0.002475783,0.002784544,0.0019690355,0.0017715085,0.001554094,0.0050637973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008106875,0.00008238805,0.0033594836,0.0005956974,0.00002677811,0.00193604,0.010948994,0.0018815023,0.009441676,0.6619467,0.011007048,0.29869255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001996483,0.00007598198,0.005808898,0.0003404961,0.000043940243,0.0018515091,0.004535506,0.0013595233,0.008177843,0.07367292,0.9040398,0.0000736836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008444916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010625223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011061353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027669063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004272545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037003875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7016387601","doi":"","title":"Щодо цифрової трансформації правосуддя та перспектив для сфери господарювання","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Economic Justice; Digital transformation; Judicial activism; Judicial independence; Judicial reform","score_opus":0.06963997720560484,"score_gpt":0.3211082447015755,"score_spread":0.2514682674959707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7016387601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07691525,0.016371885,0.13990763,0.006636138,0.0019717366,0.00031907167,0.00087488856,0.0006172225,0.7563863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7474962,0.015361213,0.09590377,0.0006514291,0.000825284,0.00043681322,0.0004310803,0.0003754725,0.13851866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870634,0.00019787662,0.00008500574,0.00020448038,0.0006654419,0.000140885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988275,0.0003535564,0.00021398325,0.00016985423,0.00035253537,0.00008248325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012122397,0.00038967887,0.0003017313,0.0023102674,0.0018042412,0.004164043,0.00046893716,0.00106869,0.021817874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029272232,0.0004864763,0.0004673726,0.00196749,0.0022869653,0.0018552586,0.0012895579,0.00186035,0.0068388013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007045376,0.00005147522,0.0018912548,0.00031953814,0.000024737636,0.000861371,0.0018294185,0.0013330873,0.0074764127,0.7997755,0.008781715,0.17758511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033623615,0.000072813215,0.006741223,0.00026347584,0.000052727337,0.0014466055,0.0011973787,0.00222698,0.008170855,0.14698774,0.8327135,0.00009306862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00536551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056079673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021817874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001723576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028965012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07298803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017230606","doi":"","title":"Achieving Cultural Normalisation of Mediation in Low Value Civil Justice: Lessons from British Columbia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Transformative mediation; Party-directed mediation; Dispute resolution; Variety (cybernetics); Economic Justice; Online dispute resolution; Dispute mechanism; Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.012761565425352528,"score_gpt":0.21254582782382103,"score_spread":0.1997842623984685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017230606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.510422,0.0071643256,0.0017767414,0.03909307,0.00028490965,0.00013075887,0.00014549014,0.000045568155,0.44093716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94856983,0.0031434367,0.001152537,0.0024146796,0.000009681603,0.00006661487,0.000068910806,0.00005212466,0.04452205],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956981,0.0016365465,0.00013761442,0.0003966502,0.0008527363,0.0012784471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99356306,0.002609963,0.00020047431,0.0004426042,0.0021559023,0.00102801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00368434,0.00037238805,0.00059114466,0.0017282268,0.035950784,0.012059953,0.0023142498,0.0017946289,0.008021763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008633854,0.00039179687,0.00020015884,0.0042042495,0.01522138,0.003447555,0.005669368,0.0054800725,0.0005732545],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020479094,0.00021231255,0.01975006,0.00026019415,0.00003635438,0.0028563933,0.49194098,0.0006329813,0.0010537658,0.29459265,0.028226422,0.16023304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037216378,0.000054868327,0.031733014,0.0010230104,0.000044119653,0.00044623786,0.6402633,0.0008146285,0.0010091393,0.028748622,0.2956382,0.00018754367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98673254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10523752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10523752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11137882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7635552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018196860","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Cases (Pt 8) | Scrutinizing the Supreme Court with Digital Technology","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitutional law; Constitutional right; Work (physics); Constitutional review; Common law","score_opus":0.02127511045832404,"score_gpt":0.23684169012191864,"score_spread":0.2155665796635946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018196860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015715383,0.0033564135,0.0032744375,0.061207473,0.0023489064,0.00029481488,0.0013046898,0.00013084053,0.91236705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40476912,0.0033026303,0.0038256417,0.065761775,0.0020004872,0.0003952092,0.0011661274,0.00015569851,0.5186233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911958,0.001557364,0.00034035035,0.0010685702,0.0036037804,0.0022341616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931104,0.0035531134,0.00021181724,0.00052842445,0.0020079205,0.0005882819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072799223,0.0002896843,0.00030127942,0.0017309578,0.015222045,0.0134134125,0.0021483635,0.009103368,0.025871392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018488647,0.0005728211,0.00086014677,0.0022967467,0.008778013,0.0037743733,0.0045361896,0.0071902466,0.0029262395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024456474,0.000036712605,0.00096774433,0.000048950493,0.00000847875,0.000503181,0.0015794875,0.00022156292,0.0005386596,0.71583873,0.2652501,0.014981898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031603864,0.000025301879,0.0030444677,0.00023123744,0.000017668108,0.000117338306,0.0023562727,0.000421842,0.0012884893,0.047315978,0.9451059,0.000043876615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36414286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49371785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36414286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021882696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025993744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72404665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019635772","doi":"","title":"How do theories of access to justice, judicial economy, and behaviour modification explain developments in the class actions debate from 1970 onward in England and Canada?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Interpretation (philosophy); Class action; Class (philosophy); Supreme court; Economic Justice; Normative; Civil procedure","score_opus":0.03935358463069893,"score_gpt":0.2674952702575487,"score_spread":0.22814168562684978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019635772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42258912,0.012157903,0.007296112,0.10937267,0.00033580634,0.00012795937,0.0006743355,0.000073401956,0.44737267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97713625,0.0023770214,0.0007413464,0.0022463875,0.000047527887,0.00002329972,0.00008499753,0.000031316205,0.017311893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927938,0.0010383488,0.0001358508,0.0009258392,0.0018168873,0.003289227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98965704,0.0036127872,0.0012376771,0.0006740788,0.0032622786,0.0015561703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060748872,0.00034069218,0.00073191966,0.0031875595,0.012342969,0.012632559,0.0029820872,0.0032718736,0.009537514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01819936,0.00037422133,0.0005813861,0.004425104,0.03482234,0.008468947,0.0027938015,0.0045820125,0.0004661368],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002330975,0.000028872422,0.011978996,0.0000655113,0.000016728824,0.00011961944,0.03761917,0.00079833466,0.000072946445,0.92548907,0.0051989444,0.018588472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008228696,0.00005376297,0.12617932,0.0010524989,0.00008524294,0.00014292533,0.13380195,0.00510419,0.0005511918,0.38750437,0.34516335,0.0002788988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9894484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99162954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17874937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17874937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13333392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9525343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019914430","doi":"","title":"IL SISTEMA DI PROTEZIONE DEI \"PENTITI\" evoluzione storica e aspetti critici della normativa","year":2014,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of Pisa)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Border Security; Seismic zone; Montenegro","score_opus":0.006628956009768496,"score_gpt":0.19109041154075132,"score_spread":0.18446145553098284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019914430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04487594,0.0032387162,0.024821976,0.10535199,0.0012235108,0.00019004861,0.00027543845,0.00019131135,0.8198311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81657493,0.0021245023,0.00872738,0.0287819,0.0005912916,0.0004336533,0.00018829489,0.00018110544,0.14239703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97815996,0.008718206,0.00096210575,0.0030697333,0.006952921,0.002137022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97195745,0.014204348,0.0027292056,0.004107441,0.0060076118,0.0009939969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02146045,0.0006461608,0.0005139947,0.0017105395,0.007341856,0.01663169,0.0021819067,0.006036926,0.008602232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027533937,0.0005616827,0.00084631366,0.0016278217,0.027125431,0.0065888916,0.0058450126,0.010910491,0.0017358755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001695871,0.000022877006,0.0016730777,0.000077623496,0.000012505022,0.000069521615,0.009730877,0.00015542009,0.00021581152,0.9631159,0.014535279,0.0103742825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033861485,0.000092808485,0.01524629,0.0007920774,0.00006986483,0.00025437857,0.0150178075,0.0014061906,0.0020579754,0.37905318,0.5858536,0.00012191955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031249922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045892898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031249922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00992572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0163747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11349505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020108619","doi":"","title":"Just-In-Time Click-Through Agreements: Interface Widgets for Confirming Informed, Unambiguous Consent","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NPARC","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interface (matter); User interface; Software; The Internet; Service (business); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.04316639892786085,"score_gpt":0.3077246884308943,"score_spread":0.26455828950303345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020108619","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012475736,0.00074117474,0.8728998,0.0018469163,0.0011402844,0.002758069,0.0008794266,0.039292492,0.067966096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17330514,0.0009063697,0.7751857,0.0018014419,0.0004859748,0.0034017223,0.001342441,0.0042089275,0.039362293],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98480713,0.0098338565,0.000989197,0.00059988594,0.0031760216,0.00059398083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94624835,0.039643146,0.0024900108,0.0065044113,0.0040375832,0.0010765106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022924857,0.001125905,0.00071404706,0.0023255686,0.0011872042,0.005148413,0.0026062527,0.0031392004,0.048242323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06647657,0.0007655344,0.00036767893,0.00095780066,0.002001541,0.0066893655,0.00434802,0.0015890056,0.021127267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032356398,0.0005074841,0.0020142756,0.0010005867,0.000049634575,0.0009977885,0.006654791,0.0008372457,0.014088001,0.12615934,0.19375025,0.65070504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005661927,0.0006668887,0.0022278184,0.0010886701,0.00009582691,0.0023771045,0.0016102664,0.020392578,0.036662623,0.07574795,0.8582108,0.00035325697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005606127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066227536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048242323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007323777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001292162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16138667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020512076","doi":"","title":"Luciana Brasil &amp; Garth Myers on Class Actions Outside Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Working class; Government (linguistics); Class action","score_opus":0.041596039897880036,"score_gpt":0.2507362156883956,"score_spread":0.20914017579051558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020512076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005782399,0.025844531,0.0003672995,0.27111343,0.0013757434,0.00006188062,0.00050750794,0.000051945673,0.69489527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09424456,0.015795838,0.00048404257,0.08681805,0.0006948132,0.00009443076,0.00013273383,0.000077919394,0.80165756],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964594,0.00036059687,0.00006928056,0.00039871692,0.0016073926,0.0011045857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768555,0.00070826785,0.00010852041,0.00007160842,0.00091789983,0.0005081297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013837899,0.00045953732,0.00036866468,0.0012774294,0.02970331,0.006781984,0.0014886325,0.007413519,0.022063345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034370453,0.00063832453,0.00035931863,0.0018227407,0.006593185,0.002544011,0.002136951,0.005323611,0.0025150604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018197463,0.000014343864,0.0013360035,0.000050333238,0.000005770726,0.00017042152,0.0029619765,0.00010635851,0.00017486839,0.15375717,0.8281149,0.013289668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008998514,0.0000042898673,0.005940493,0.00016970499,0.000009337942,0.00003428902,0.0028703767,0.00010381301,0.00013466291,0.0054551903,0.985232,0.000036858564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9821717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091387525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.091387525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.066089615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.663066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020966190","doi":"","title":"The National Class as Extraterritorial Legislation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Flexibility (engineering); Class (philosophy); Class action; Constitutional law; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.01779146077458339,"score_gpt":0.25768401541126207,"score_spread":0.2398925546366787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020966190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0673726,0.001698564,0.011451074,0.0060080388,0.0001892769,0.00006864904,0.00008600579,0.00007585874,0.91304994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92627794,0.000616221,0.0030614852,0.002547752,0.000108566346,0.000084434796,0.00005229752,0.000027936841,0.06722352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961068,0.0005904048,0.00016147326,0.0006450639,0.0013495168,0.001146674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833655,0.0005407249,0.00021811202,0.00045761096,0.0002907269,0.00015618537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023107436,0.00016865757,0.00028332986,0.0006957189,0.0055777137,0.0060715047,0.0013873944,0.0026007597,0.0067181634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034903234,0.00026687427,0.00043650248,0.00074528897,0.009830381,0.0030885448,0.004256385,0.0039653652,0.0007277442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000496882,0.000008106346,0.00037010352,0.000008638975,0.0000014082648,0.000023813267,0.001003505,0.00008146363,0.00016979255,0.99202675,0.000993433,0.005307999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005288023,0.000084902706,0.009115545,0.00031598896,0.000060086815,0.00030240632,0.0032202548,0.0014697845,0.002777275,0.3423112,0.6402337,0.000056008783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058772266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12137083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058772266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009244007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01142025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11686033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7021079745","doi":"","title":"Model Practices in Judicial Reform: A Report on Experiences outside the Region","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Modernization theory; Economic Justice; Judicial reform; Best practice","score_opus":0.043074315753015346,"score_gpt":0.2861922973110925,"score_spread":0.24311798155807718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7021079745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77734333,0.0095663415,0.0057245693,0.031793877,0.0003563017,0.00022101532,0.00007025631,0.00013952483,0.17478475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786522,0.004160072,0.0011446266,0.0020364264,0.000056859215,0.0001061635,0.00003992911,0.000075650394,0.01372816],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9705866,0.021674646,0.0005583422,0.0008610855,0.0022624368,0.004056908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987812,0.0058693234,0.0013662212,0.0014040367,0.001584097,0.0019643474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021010673,0.00033178972,0.00094265956,0.0010622826,0.021343589,0.018251184,0.00279676,0.0045373742,0.0034161753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022554733,0.00064499024,0.00076012645,0.0030868629,0.018275743,0.007203691,0.01277452,0.0077443602,0.000602103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052443516,0.00038978193,0.0029797284,0.00016167857,0.000014211475,0.001189969,0.8507523,0.00089723495,0.000722078,0.112167634,0.0084112175,0.022261782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055718814,0.00029608063,0.0052299,0.00041314983,0.000025982701,0.00080985366,0.7040337,0.0006843803,0.0005467266,0.00747561,0.28037304,0.00005586865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03278101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042888854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03278101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012953505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01709557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11111635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7021214943","doi":"","title":"Nobel, Michael: The Use of Means of Social Communication in the Context of Procedural Law : Questions and Suggestions on the Advantages of Using the Internet at Local Tribunals for Marriage Cases in the Canadian Context. Chambly, 2021","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Publication Server of the Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt (Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Procedural justice; The Internet; Procedural law; Common law; Social media","score_opus":0.0501745468073858,"score_gpt":0.24833359050438158,"score_spread":0.19815904369699577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7021214943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011692614,0.058472734,0.0016228579,0.2630554,0.0012806051,0.00013324773,0.0011321716,0.00011009048,0.6625003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27337262,0.037772078,0.0023271306,0.024849458,0.00045029493,0.0001409244,0.00034092178,0.00015269725,0.660594],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847704,0.00026898115,0.00005054329,0.000117761454,0.00067126786,0.000414352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976927,0.0008423038,0.0000968586,0.000055826717,0.0010125465,0.00029984358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014550609,0.0006242019,0.00021875121,0.0020560375,0.016471319,0.0060096798,0.0020864825,0.008600618,0.024776824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004992682,0.0003361156,0.00021403852,0.003281459,0.0069491733,0.0053050793,0.0016580777,0.0034636508,0.0028605938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071977665,0.000046113084,0.0017164146,0.00024705552,0.000008610767,0.0006237663,0.025276914,0.00015183013,0.00051060325,0.37165874,0.5409491,0.05873877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028331042,0.000014815869,0.014077272,0.00071694696,0.000027895585,0.00016491668,0.03421619,0.00019985734,0.0011350658,0.039118342,0.91023904,0.00006123831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9380302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97974753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061969817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020403478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04061083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14803827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024310352","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Lawyer Immunity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Qualified immunity; Scope (computer science); Common law; Position (finance); Immunity","score_opus":0.1899313627943164,"score_gpt":0.27712907978214935,"score_spread":0.08719771698783294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024310352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10735187,0.008186574,0.031189816,0.21526448,0.0033836125,0.00018398442,0.000027453249,0.0002043779,0.63420784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88207525,0.0020153858,0.0064355917,0.05045639,0.0013204712,0.00009815168,0.000011889652,0.00006469736,0.057522066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746528,0.00886864,0.001162203,0.0028338258,0.008239878,0.0042425175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97402275,0.017216008,0.0012429545,0.002644719,0.0035353955,0.0013382067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030680865,0.00029288183,0.00071548333,0.0017720043,0.009970435,0.013663306,0.0030285448,0.014675262,0.0059977532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043343134,0.00065750076,0.0007811308,0.0008720152,0.037357345,0.013058162,0.015108056,0.01648441,0.0009958916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053199105,0.000022085096,0.00032717604,0.000035354034,0.0000036134786,0.00015951622,0.010608803,0.00009331166,0.00026187501,0.9739183,0.0038300927,0.010734429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051229123,0.00014898978,0.0028123038,0.0008257161,0.000046033343,0.00048120235,0.009929211,0.0018736896,0.0012067894,0.4314605,0.55108476,0.000079518155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024802005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03511754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030680865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010139917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017161759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16225785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025244790","doi":"","title":"Walter Merricks and Stephen Wisking on UK Class Actions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Class (philosophy); Supreme court; Competition (biology); Competition law","score_opus":0.03069319810551902,"score_gpt":0.2482182579514453,"score_spread":0.2175250598459263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025244790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01080622,0.03470637,0.0007147544,0.2741497,0.0066810483,0.00006553878,0.00017215848,0.000044414617,0.6726598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22524785,0.017428488,0.00070140586,0.2710229,0.0042096674,0.00013190796,0.00012487793,0.00011966521,0.48101327],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936226,0.0014275117,0.00023551958,0.00066653616,0.0020729466,0.0019748653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972193,0.0015865308,0.00019934884,0.00016764745,0.0005034378,0.0003237458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025748217,0.00048451274,0.00047553712,0.0011600119,0.012672388,0.007943993,0.0012186801,0.015041675,0.012966277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010664785,0.0005260507,0.00045696646,0.0014466116,0.008565074,0.005442232,0.0037969095,0.012539346,0.0026106974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022865914,0.00001420988,0.00046545372,0.000075983415,0.0000052982505,0.00048120806,0.009585251,0.000067165274,0.00014298764,0.4364724,0.5376437,0.015023612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007314447,0.000007581171,0.00089876115,0.00025864382,0.000004956836,0.00010843068,0.0025974815,0.000029538514,0.0001018746,0.009902297,0.9860617,0.00002144029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2965776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43775144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2965776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01253716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007192089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58970267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026665374","doi":"","title":"Asynchronous Online Courts: The Future of Courts?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholars' Bank (University of Oregon)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Asynchronous communication; Online dispute resolution; China; Dispute resolution; Online discussion; Online participation","score_opus":0.011734975262122608,"score_gpt":0.20547461595696515,"score_spread":0.19373964069484254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026665374","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013487583,0.047619835,0.005575579,0.7617125,0.0037977789,0.000028621584,0.000105962674,0.00015302838,0.16751918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6965289,0.09283588,0.008945466,0.11500033,0.022136448,0.00016703884,0.00020664427,0.00015299342,0.06402627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99417686,0.0026745885,0.00021702972,0.000623056,0.0012925216,0.0010159651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96501344,0.017964436,0.0027414535,0.0024631892,0.0050970125,0.006720486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009527893,0.00021668823,0.00027818157,0.0014003316,0.003546842,0.018927908,0.0015478042,0.008259755,0.025237368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023198558,0.00022809135,0.00031854663,0.0015832379,0.009617115,0.031782214,0.0031159015,0.006572373,0.0024869272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032148113,0.00008506773,0.00090949395,0.00010899385,0.0000029405362,0.00008970927,0.001219023,0.00019507717,0.00012601881,0.7924597,0.07090719,0.13386467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034336674,0.00004518768,0.0014148719,0.00068723405,0.0000064786514,0.00016102925,0.004443189,0.00084800925,0.00018358207,0.38317394,0.6089652,0.00003697338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006086175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006983165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025237368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049004643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008937199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084427476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027192912","doi":"","title":"Chief Justice Winkler to Receive Honourary Doctorate from Osgoode Hall Law School; Plans Underway for New Dispute Resolution Institute and Chair to Honour Legacy of Ontario Chief Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute mechanism","score_opus":0.030313778046500192,"score_gpt":0.2566200483184508,"score_spread":0.2263062702719506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027192912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036348188,0.0036586437,0.000865432,0.07288937,0.0074168835,0.00031738196,0.0015802513,0.0005967903,0.90904033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036237952,0.00041785632,0.00014481979,0.0018189425,0.00013518927,0.00001446509,0.00015390219,0.000049172133,0.9936419],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979595,0.00009063597,0.000063705986,0.00027532814,0.0009876143,0.0006232852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957001,0.00011657309,0.0001210417,0.00012751881,0.001577543,0.0023571665],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012956786,0.0005782692,0.000572563,0.0008396039,0.010356842,0.0055760634,0.0010265792,0.0035466987,0.4249512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028445767,0.0006471321,0.00037325188,0.0007486663,0.0015321866,0.0020992255,0.0022131568,0.0033057735,0.15810998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013570906,0.000016314963,0.0005781088,0.000024006227,0.0000017455119,0.000068745576,0.00022403948,0.000013427954,0.00021704508,0.0023086697,0.9850358,0.011498511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031945497,0.0000042070646,0.0015054769,0.000018133584,9.95836e-7,0.000028690498,0.0003153691,0.000019751305,0.0000527618,0.00010157425,0.99794394,0.0000058158626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57823265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8986852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4249512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022790998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028049562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84850246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027216668","doi":"","title":"Bail in the Time of COVID-19","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Criminal code; Order (exchange); Pandemic; Legislation","score_opus":0.09337362167949098,"score_gpt":0.3060769944052944,"score_spread":0.21270337272580342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027216668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16267774,0.0075225257,0.0042079394,0.2137757,0.0072354525,0.00022081377,0.00051274244,0.00021649989,0.60363054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79240805,0.0011381775,0.0012777904,0.0713699,0.0015265216,0.00008163026,0.00012777996,0.00010140542,0.1319688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99009925,0.0011946048,0.00044732762,0.001075397,0.003794209,0.0033892044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99157315,0.0018279479,0.00086197304,0.00046180794,0.0026455554,0.0026295942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007641017,0.00022593535,0.00040526674,0.0009262334,0.010156534,0.008584573,0.0011611168,0.008867071,0.008769637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027733468,0.00066923816,0.00035538847,0.00063171436,0.008784388,0.003854477,0.0058369273,0.013064445,0.0016337375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034877338,0.00011088991,0.017523311,0.00021603519,0.000036971393,0.0071139866,0.029975591,0.00039360183,0.0030616769,0.7120758,0.1854186,0.043724727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029980476,0.00014692312,0.022010041,0.0003047298,0.0000136976205,0.00076318946,0.0065173465,0.00027483192,0.0013362974,0.016695857,0.951816,0.00009117193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21169946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39667067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21169946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028708804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023189623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42093444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027359568","doi":"","title":"Civil Litigation Process: Cases and Materials, 9th Edition","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Casebook; Watson; Civil procedure; Civil litigation; Indigenous; Flexibility (engineering); Practice of law; Section (typography); Common law","score_opus":0.01549977979884746,"score_gpt":0.2274174775955983,"score_spread":0.21191769779675085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027359568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006954872,0.065310135,0.00392394,0.012600271,0.015393378,0.0004497879,0.0069370656,0.0013928361,0.8932972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004634102,0.051500075,0.0042394362,0.004826257,0.0026831839,0.00037390972,0.007786841,0.00057341374,0.9233828],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829775,0.00011833784,0.000097781674,0.00012372887,0.0012161835,0.00014622266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976057,0.00057648146,0.000100558515,0.00017435539,0.0013094532,0.00023338517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012053725,0.0010727722,0.00076375576,0.003797003,0.0030868617,0.00823879,0.0017836018,0.0024197544,0.12525952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005292222,0.0010177497,0.0005821097,0.004948671,0.0015825342,0.0034869749,0.0021765823,0.0027776235,0.06994849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028505444,0.000014961503,0.000028049475,0.0000911074,5.38181e-7,0.00002722626,0.000079114805,0.00012093344,0.00007172138,0.0061182487,0.9599159,0.033529483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013148018,0.0000020605783,0.00015936224,0.00015033735,4.6885532e-7,0.00003498037,0.000049802984,0.000026661175,0.000023139608,0.0009781234,0.9985703,0.000003480071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19054918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23014282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19054918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011464035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02559874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41903484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028861696","doi":"","title":"Hastings Law News 2000 Vol.2 Iss.3","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impeachment; Principal (computer security); Criminal trial; Work (physics); Public defender; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.014044783285735054,"score_gpt":0.2130396410327222,"score_spread":0.19899485774698714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028861696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016770951,0.0047828574,0.00017281318,0.035485536,0.0053175683,0.000112022026,0.0015802197,0.00059361465,0.9502783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007369748,0.0043402365,0.00018790633,0.027265327,0.002667404,0.00010366154,0.0007786957,0.00014358092,0.9571433],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989668,0.000055388427,0.00005234887,0.0001181675,0.00058075617,0.00022651222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990889,0.00023708165,0.00007502822,0.00009089227,0.00027590644,0.00023216108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009440108,0.0011654578,0.00069710705,0.0016271693,0.0049709803,0.010466508,0.0009377505,0.008534767,0.2894952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039059212,0.0010361801,0.0007744557,0.001366658,0.0020991904,0.002512209,0.0021049979,0.0071532996,0.1741798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031577983,0.0000718616,0.00056386826,0.000114077106,0.000008112295,0.0003193875,0.000104630235,0.00005475108,0.0002580755,0.0077884174,0.9608181,0.029867176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000133766325,0.000018748395,0.0016516709,0.00025029015,0.000006158749,0.00004402864,0.00016352619,0.00007678885,0.000115056355,0.0011893606,0.9964586,0.000012421738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03036531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07215361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2894952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004054619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028925461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96845794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030014730","doi":"","title":"The Long Unwind: British Columbia Court of Appeal Litigation Activity 1995–2022","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; High Court; Government (linguistics); Liability; Supreme court","score_opus":0.009338062405207495,"score_gpt":0.22115919203153933,"score_spread":0.21182112962633184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030014730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1275291,0.011576521,0.0006122966,0.11128626,0.0028120594,0.00050088816,0.003084025,0.00018359885,0.74241525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24341445,0.0024723809,0.00041756977,0.026591344,0.0002644096,0.00017535342,0.0008717683,0.00010010498,0.72569263],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920839,0.0005236277,0.00022036383,0.00048760176,0.0036712685,0.003013249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99019605,0.0025037173,0.0002732324,0.00032373925,0.005067644,0.0016356559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049153566,0.00055728294,0.0008368539,0.0037299392,0.039257627,0.017945742,0.003767557,0.01564884,0.032631226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019579038,0.0014927285,0.0005410077,0.0041226936,0.004023254,0.0029900726,0.004394969,0.015618329,0.0038784165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002822422,0.00021552091,0.008911579,0.00014227764,0.00006780146,0.0019213438,0.0056856866,0.0006128516,0.0009649259,0.060812358,0.8758914,0.04449199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008587885,0.000052624207,0.064036086,0.00052574923,0.00014192313,0.00027225798,0.023921726,0.0013556207,0.0013285101,0.008513464,0.8995532,0.00021303477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9704999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100673884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100673884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13776371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7304436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030434580","doi":"","title":"\\n Dernier appel, Canada [Québec] 2001, 52 minutes","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Fusible alloy","score_opus":0.006758984116816504,"score_gpt":0.14855652429425312,"score_spread":0.14179754017743662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030434580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022071155,0.026706338,0.0006852025,0.036022,0.03072591,0.0012236952,0.029322008,0.0012314528,0.8718763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013826382,0.0017592042,0.00009135339,0.002346562,0.0004117547,0.00012341312,0.0012599982,0.00012096126,0.9925041],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987913,0.000063407155,0.000047241683,0.00015274413,0.00053534727,0.00041006375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857855,0.00009323018,0.000056499095,0.000058398513,0.00091726554,0.0002959048],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011584107,0.0018044859,0.0011873075,0.001731923,0.010863416,0.007346348,0.0021204907,0.009920579,0.3627889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036488806,0.0010635275,0.001015748,0.003632851,0.0009837868,0.0020010446,0.002008273,0.004019753,0.15351105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017242808,0.000005282842,0.00008453385,0.000037230402,0.0000016035052,0.00002566651,0.00002940632,0.00002431526,0.000026732303,0.00041966792,0.9959214,0.0034069046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010751574,0.000003579713,0.0012524704,0.00006664141,0.0000028170896,0.0000061875967,0.00011875121,0.00002495438,0.00001985344,0.000096687334,0.9983896,0.000007778524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91516095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97659373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3627889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018352663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026722513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9089043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030486445","doi":"","title":"No place for courts in affordable housing fight, Ontario’s top court rules","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics); Supreme court; Affordable housing","score_opus":0.01336434538717323,"score_gpt":0.22692086915121204,"score_spread":0.2135565237640388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030486445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040846724,0.0021917024,0.0027227993,0.2954941,0.0027791217,0.00022826392,0.0012267206,0.00014469003,0.6543659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38239327,0.0010226921,0.003190822,0.12832282,0.0007795477,0.00017390081,0.00035631072,0.00017102319,0.4835896],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99184847,0.0007962162,0.0002548559,0.0008651318,0.0029829263,0.0032525237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99192566,0.0015638766,0.0002970773,0.00036332762,0.003536047,0.0023140872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005550054,0.00036356668,0.00055256346,0.0010209705,0.029765904,0.01595049,0.002816896,0.014224786,0.017406922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014837321,0.00095778017,0.0007835067,0.0011762449,0.008475488,0.0041782423,0.0025744531,0.010801739,0.0016056761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006892453,0.0000519359,0.0054926937,0.000057298148,0.00005006554,0.00037395756,0.0054266546,0.0003501522,0.00041606431,0.46820304,0.5069543,0.012554875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009587482,0.000025359444,0.012581667,0.0002462909,0.000075253,0.0000632189,0.0073757623,0.0006398555,0.00042245552,0.039073966,0.9392456,0.00015463727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077372216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.077372216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15031438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56137735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030518908","doi":"","title":"!!Norton 36O!@!Support!@!phone++1.80O.7.5.065.84++ Norton 36O tech Support Phone Number","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phone; Toll; Service (business); Telephone number; Phone call","score_opus":0.012639037245195632,"score_gpt":0.2514808523315614,"score_spread":0.2388418150863658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030518908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005068641,0.00029646396,0.0008538752,0.0004848781,0.0005156232,0.00007769792,0.0018053538,0.0031429017,0.99231625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005279155,0.00017124912,0.00025076797,0.000087079316,0.000028233817,0.000014094786,0.0007670613,0.0004922645,0.99766135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994941,0.000028598044,0.000014862243,0.00010168848,0.0002982424,0.00006251369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982014,0.00010999791,0.000051518222,0.00017100587,0.0009159131,0.000550137],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003607819,0.0009742782,0.0008062361,0.0011656992,0.0016670036,0.00529527,0.0011147424,0.0011075225,0.8953915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018471262,0.0006281569,0.00049281446,0.0013256888,0.00043845875,0.0022295201,0.0015439183,0.0011387044,0.8955875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003973461,0.000032560976,0.00016398744,0.00007937889,0.0000021722733,0.0000594173,0.000047628266,0.00004342198,0.0014328518,0.001562523,0.95538086,0.041155502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065895138,0.000016733982,0.0003256709,0.00004572354,0.0000037081888,0.00007111166,0.00007997685,0.000084879066,0.00041852018,0.00017279763,0.99876654,0.000007707112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01791503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04051338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104608476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016112508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018870878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14921129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030591866","doi":"","title":"Negotiation with Metis: What Courts Can Do to Help","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Dispute resolution; Dispute mechanism; Identification (biology); Online dispute resolution; Resolution (logic)","score_opus":0.010976267029113747,"score_gpt":0.2225987250581087,"score_spread":0.21162245802899496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030591866","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013041947,0.011833864,0.035310514,0.6212832,0.0027044874,0.00027843975,0.000053635948,0.00049281976,0.31500107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7360863,0.011403308,0.049181532,0.11921865,0.00326413,0.0009071382,0.00021383517,0.00049739983,0.079227716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95135844,0.02882286,0.002345195,0.0021583047,0.009288646,0.0060264235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9258855,0.041303303,0.0047694454,0.006993153,0.011129246,0.009919262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05048987,0.000761394,0.0011794002,0.0040459787,0.02039595,0.02973843,0.0055232192,0.023646433,0.01811381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13258103,0.00072560704,0.0010140751,0.0027371724,0.01780108,0.037531875,0.018348495,0.014058009,0.0047320416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049581602,0.00026218154,0.0026579078,0.00026694508,0.00003352323,0.00096896227,0.017931778,0.0006908136,0.00031839975,0.7149578,0.11653924,0.14532289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083540675,0.000070669375,0.00069792225,0.0011313793,0.0000229291,0.00047532064,0.024124058,0.001189415,0.00041737602,0.5575538,0.41414365,0.00008992708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060080253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009007633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05048987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007197716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018352328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26701915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7033089087","doi":"","title":"Overhead Gridline Systems to Exclude Waterfowl From Large Bodies of Water","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utah State Research and Scholarship (Utah State University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Overhead (engineering); Wildlife; Herring; Line (geometry); Overhead line; Herring gull; Wetland","score_opus":0.056828524003050836,"score_gpt":0.2925957803641817,"score_spread":0.23576725636113088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7033089087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9605382,0.0002709318,0.022715827,0.00016593348,0.000105978885,0.00030881775,0.0010678514,0.0009694958,0.013856939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9396544,0.00034102052,0.03798814,0.00017986068,0.000039019764,0.0003152006,0.0012614337,0.000074589116,0.020146314],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998117,0.00003144331,0.000013770378,0.00003876847,0.00007242171,0.000031797237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995065,0.00007352136,0.00013967347,0.00008448436,0.00013735257,0.000058516027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016964627,0.00040106982,0.00013949661,0.00035244905,0.00037975254,0.00029979437,0.0005161377,0.0002140579,0.01061691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004774857,0.000114161565,0.0001538567,0.00034307703,0.00016779812,0.00049956556,0.00036997284,0.000245479,0.0018658221],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012917081,0.0012927531,0.09454812,0.0007311785,0.00014905565,0.0005888557,0.00067414966,0.006179202,0.34865788,0.0010098242,0.014238982,0.5306383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000768729,0.015225655,0.5041312,0.00035612565,0.0003253973,0.0024296849,0.0016189967,0.03391612,0.2659685,0.0011043752,0.1740139,0.0001413481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040072356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011342075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01061691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018511064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028506614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035517037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7037093156","doi":"","title":"The Douglas Edward Leach Papers Finding Aid","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discover Archive (Vanderbilt University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Cover (algebra); Professional association; Professional development; Continuing professional development; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.009091636036541775,"score_gpt":0.1959867473142876,"score_spread":0.18689511127774583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7037093156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010708645,0.024530094,0.0030746995,0.080773145,0.0504051,0.00074160064,0.023106884,0.0020798992,0.8142177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021980554,0.009569633,0.0032242713,0.0038888576,0.0028780664,0.000342488,0.005339296,0.0010246322,0.9715347],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99397635,0.00081980677,0.0005596395,0.0005587699,0.003678554,0.00040685953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751042,0.0037425626,0.0011102894,0.0028970717,0.014509747,0.0026361377],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007503632,0.0011722713,0.001036566,0.009559733,0.006500435,0.017124984,0.002126893,0.001981666,0.3323167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043513075,0.0008257437,0.0007270021,0.01157404,0.001487681,0.008112253,0.0054090624,0.0025815277,0.24609108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032323278,0.0000025493507,0.000031975065,0.000033123288,3.9598302e-7,0.00000870505,0.00003729497,0.0000037341465,0.000009039923,0.0015139666,0.98494095,0.013415009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.731242e-7,8.016749e-7,0.00005595499,0.00007247248,4.0824054e-7,0.000010655584,0.000061727784,0.0000024244875,0.000011730906,0.00020294228,0.99957794,0.0000019441104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0147857405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020588666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3323167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065355613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016226139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9523692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7037533875","doi":"","title":"Development of climate-based indices for assessing the hygrothermal performance of wood frame walls under historical and future climates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cladding (metalworking); Durability; Range (aeronautics); Index (typography); Frame (networking); Masonry veneer; Regression analysis; Climate change","score_opus":0.03172909268456791,"score_gpt":0.28298601912630517,"score_spread":0.25125692644173725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7037533875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76919997,0.0001746171,0.2235164,0.00007433977,0.000025354513,0.00017902724,0.0008180624,0.00070880965,0.0053034537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9344165,0.00012451952,0.063522466,0.000010407811,0.000007812832,0.00010799497,0.0011071137,0.00004971695,0.00065357157],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996315,0.00007538457,0.000025079049,0.000070629,0.00015613284,0.000041302326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989833,0.00025700542,0.0002097093,0.00007701381,0.00042762747,0.000045310368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013973708,0.00094831496,0.00040704082,0.002193625,0.00024350201,0.0009936676,0.00072988647,0.00053963985,0.00056773465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026016457,0.0002818432,0.0006615036,0.0012147647,0.00029634815,0.0010372744,0.0006280506,0.000456961,0.00019285426],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008134963,0.00016375989,0.059045818,0.00007424457,0.000096354444,0.00007741344,0.00011379875,0.87876177,0.009676682,0.0014994548,0.00047678963,0.049932517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026318162,0.000056506356,0.019052584,0.000007497604,0.000013838133,0.000016271859,0.000059061986,0.9766219,0.0035056886,0.00029317255,0.0003553596,0.000015576416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011535988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010200602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011535988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000803745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000825643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022937715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038119849","doi":"","title":"Fairness in class action settlements","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Settlement (finance); Human settlement; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Principal (computer security); Collective action","score_opus":0.007803173895451779,"score_gpt":0.15700075844164885,"score_spread":0.14919758454619708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038119849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09120535,0.0020198817,0.07850772,0.026699344,0.0006841893,0.00058961235,0.000109372515,0.00012460443,0.8000599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96737695,0.00030896478,0.007738154,0.0013144441,0.0002267017,0.00016923416,0.000026983707,0.000043881246,0.022794763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.88971287,0.05826031,0.0056138528,0.008345855,0.026948897,0.011118282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94172674,0.03189032,0.005390932,0.0065075005,0.0119121205,0.0025724634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06613001,0.0004301774,0.0008500135,0.0027431806,0.018149475,0.017494446,0.002211661,0.0061594164,0.011094105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12433501,0.0005074264,0.00081479666,0.0020854531,0.037578266,0.00859277,0.009183318,0.00550472,0.00093930296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015787353,0.00001643586,0.0011432465,0.000028286126,0.0000064849764,0.000060620314,0.006893851,0.00029731615,0.00010105953,0.97755426,0.0019734127,0.011909302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006493035,0.00006032535,0.0065507162,0.0004103129,0.000034546818,0.00012926951,0.010437645,0.0016146296,0.0008164134,0.85138303,0.12842816,0.0000700732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04622646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046905726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06613001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017217763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02898385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3497331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038911959","doi":"","title":"La Responsabilità del vettore aereo dalla Convenzione di Varsavia del 1929 alla Convenzione di Montreal del 1999","year":2003,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"UnissResearch (Università degli Studi di Sassari)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persona; West indies; Ivory tower","score_opus":0.028567399875604575,"score_gpt":0.2619966709060285,"score_spread":0.23342927103042393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038911959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58141035,0.007355029,0.001983578,0.025913283,0.0007079467,0.00017927116,0.0021718307,0.0001225542,0.38015616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77116704,0.0019254552,0.000486683,0.0016421424,0.00012524318,0.000041986114,0.00041000952,0.000026847752,0.22417462],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862695,0.00012442187,0.000013923861,0.00020813248,0.00038348086,0.00064318324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820316,0.00020453452,0.00023161242,0.000082496415,0.0005369548,0.00074135413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009504139,0.0003423357,0.00016029221,0.0008121631,0.0050774924,0.0029573531,0.0009858279,0.0010013512,0.028279807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019142184,0.00027516077,0.00019316729,0.0012447591,0.0029574924,0.00068388187,0.0024596867,0.0013787433,0.001744374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004023386,0.00019707487,0.3296131,0.00075521955,0.00010675267,0.0022637548,0.082483806,0.0012401277,0.015717216,0.14276087,0.15857984,0.26588005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000117627915,0.00012767594,0.4027088,0.00018735298,0.000018331015,0.00018224384,0.012161641,0.000122068916,0.0014881807,0.00086989946,0.58207434,0.000047692178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78912896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89719784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78912896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017271947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024176575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42422575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042527784","doi":"","title":"Perceptual dogmatism and undercutting defeat","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Phenomenon; Perceptual system; Perceptual learning; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.014584388047228244,"score_gpt":0.20228523564892917,"score_spread":0.18770084760170092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042527784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4609988,0.0027885067,0.029910255,0.018211313,0.00017356545,0.000036989546,0.00006126853,0.000056561763,0.48776275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99493235,0.0002969506,0.0011638066,0.0001866286,0.0000238986,0.00000411407,0.000013238829,0.000007659255,0.0033714164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998679,0.0006666388,0.00005071296,0.00016044726,0.00028151236,0.0001616756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99489814,0.0026274975,0.0010805825,0.00067678577,0.00049907214,0.00021791001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029080787,0.000178212,0.00018269014,0.00073114445,0.0017544876,0.0039077364,0.00048644474,0.0011220921,0.005617812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007150919,0.0001501794,0.00025081562,0.0005608118,0.0150645105,0.0047530336,0.0025196173,0.0025192162,0.00029080614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020006475,0.000030750864,0.0022058238,0.00003335569,0.0000060285265,0.00012919106,0.007663856,0.00031068383,0.00030471882,0.9765023,0.0008348786,0.011958411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000157661,0.000048406026,0.0094182575,0.00010381947,0.000013100307,0.0003129789,0.01053163,0.0015583357,0.0008055578,0.9424589,0.034717586,0.000015721103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021826292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002827326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005617812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002245739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013624304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018793404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042665318","doi":"","title":"Personal Reflections on ADR Reforms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute board; Dispute resolution; Dispute mechanism; Jurisdiction; Economic Justice; Civil litigation; Alternative dispute resolution; Settlement (finance); Online dispute resolution; Pace","score_opus":0.022048012494801837,"score_gpt":0.2605485412354811,"score_spread":0.23850052874067926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042665318","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035570532,0.008684348,0.0018322391,0.84020025,0.005403606,0.00009501249,0.00014008765,0.000075925585,0.14001143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09568346,0.008128139,0.00423051,0.775208,0.0068196957,0.00022212227,0.00014914319,0.0001695871,0.10938942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9537138,0.01769918,0.0022885776,0.00560654,0.011174643,0.009517207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9594587,0.021007411,0.0013866727,0.0035094211,0.009512546,0.0051251343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054178227,0.0005673043,0.00069668936,0.0016775907,0.011028066,0.021874048,0.005357187,0.029894097,0.039837793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06910158,0.00055799255,0.0016862842,0.002633548,0.013399971,0.018841207,0.009172205,0.026447255,0.004924912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003516776,0.00017906955,0.00065719726,0.0001827491,0.0000070469396,0.00023877759,0.0024144563,0.00033322006,0.00018741432,0.6542436,0.29719403,0.04432724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000210673,0.000032726406,0.00071743876,0.00018831095,0.000003832976,0.00009235191,0.0023104355,0.00016459661,0.0001743679,0.03020533,0.966062,0.000027627473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047006894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048051946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054178227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021202795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029298138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28652525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042974156","doi":"","title":"Recenti tendenze in tema di risoluzione delle controversie: la prospettiva canadese","year":2007,"lang":"it","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Florence Research (University of Florence)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Barrel (horology); Qualitative analysis; Molecular spectroscopy","score_opus":0.07849037285462188,"score_gpt":0.29282301278753936,"score_spread":0.21433263993291748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042974156","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021318892,0.49725175,0.0013801992,0.37641206,0.002965964,0.000043809294,0.0012996586,0.00012383849,0.09920383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2793262,0.5948686,0.0052522053,0.05629954,0.005042083,0.00013440503,0.0019321819,0.00030500736,0.056839757],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99251986,0.0015539114,0.00031065068,0.00087744393,0.0040262346,0.0007118777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9429053,0.03736617,0.003951111,0.001521137,0.011535843,0.0027205255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013491757,0.000477506,0.00062684953,0.0081493,0.0036509912,0.012079575,0.0024281968,0.0033564717,0.017179117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03732195,0.00044629604,0.0005283177,0.014659673,0.0089761475,0.006018904,0.004514254,0.005615753,0.0010782593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013289097,0.000073407704,0.025492068,0.0027405405,0.00010624375,0.0003314592,0.025784232,0.00033054626,0.0002925046,0.30332124,0.29753235,0.3438625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000159695,0.000030541712,0.038493875,0.002705117,0.00007661698,0.0004232259,0.011177465,0.00012929703,0.00037758515,0.018457854,0.9280565,0.000055978697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3037276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4850573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6962724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023170942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037100933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6039194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043013956","doi":"","title":"Shifting into “Neutral”: Evaluating Mediation as a Peaceful Alternative to the Forceful Resolution of the 2022 Canada–Freedom Convoy Dispute","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Government (linguistics); Argument (complex analysis); Alternative dispute resolution; Party-directed mediation; Dispute resolution; Dispute mechanism; Public policy","score_opus":0.01671276538663173,"score_gpt":0.22889902399015152,"score_spread":0.2121862586035198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043013956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33516365,0.00886147,0.011695621,0.028614765,0.0007691837,0.0039484682,0.00015554662,0.000045908862,0.6107454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848873,0.002137144,0.0045461548,0.0033237564,0.00015245461,0.0010280863,0.00005603487,0.000019700221,0.003849328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9246664,0.049960904,0.0014859074,0.0018502207,0.012828277,0.009208234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95614344,0.03018445,0.0029506204,0.001647174,0.0062055923,0.0028687033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0514532,0.0011578359,0.0010175253,0.0024835083,0.0149421785,0.016912669,0.004617569,0.0075436705,0.009986615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0713593,0.0003380076,0.0013302052,0.0027328858,0.027124023,0.009608685,0.009232903,0.007866187,0.0005920237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002652005,0.0019811739,0.005576185,0.0017752905,0.00034654702,0.00042763472,0.01736225,0.010410668,0.0010535059,0.8875832,0.004300376,0.06653122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053721312,0.014016234,0.018794362,0.0058515845,0.0021493288,0.00034867047,0.22623302,0.044425223,0.006416849,0.47884327,0.19700408,0.0005452056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15407246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21322499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84592754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047210142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05700214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34253514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043327173","doi":"","title":"Self-Represented Litigants &amp; Legal Doctrines of “Vexatiousness” - An Interim Report from The National Self-Represented Litigants Project","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Jurisprudence; Extension (predicate logic); Section (typography); Common law","score_opus":0.03694937151051764,"score_gpt":0.27050990213038156,"score_spread":0.23356053061986393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043327173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31117612,0.010203303,0.006567815,0.08042191,0.0005946263,0.0016543497,0.024753792,0.00039631134,0.56423175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8150797,0.014417192,0.010154554,0.010206287,0.00017603047,0.0008993991,0.02679693,0.00022060775,0.12204923],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810666,0.002019538,0.00058063184,0.00090139866,0.013556442,0.0018754121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95366067,0.012558534,0.0022667272,0.002852517,0.022959374,0.005702072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018977819,0.00020250677,0.00036571515,0.00434699,0.0070889606,0.0125225475,0.0023287924,0.0013289485,0.0058420515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03125006,0.0005489643,0.00035361518,0.0045666555,0.0045590424,0.00289359,0.005524481,0.0025994936,0.00083864166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121893674,0.00035431213,0.11881451,0.00038759198,0.00005480739,0.00081743154,0.04560865,0.00070721214,0.00065532717,0.15310802,0.48353022,0.19583999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029811112,0.000046976635,0.17605607,0.0008257502,0.00004980072,0.0004135391,0.07219286,0.0014622018,0.0016532117,0.0105277775,0.7366433,0.00009870582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8348397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86683923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1651603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038493115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.085896246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33226585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043838528","doi":"","title":"Tracking the Trends of the Self-Represented Litigant Phenomenon: Data from the National Self-Represented Litigants Project, 2019-2021","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tracking (education); Economic Justice; Public health; Health data; Data collection; Confidentiality","score_opus":0.05987234556552366,"score_gpt":0.26437820103502696,"score_spread":0.20450585546950328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043838528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687807,0.00022310964,0.00021257602,0.0018902125,0.000027154618,0.00010787869,0.023277689,0.000015611336,0.0054651415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9574438,0.0005280368,0.00052351056,0.00095295673,0.000041418047,0.00039356056,0.031856604,0.000043631553,0.00821652],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969783,0.0005727192,0.00029977664,0.00033429777,0.0012116664,0.0006033012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856566,0.001310929,0.0035681434,0.00074311584,0.006575936,0.0021453178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045482893,0.00015057214,0.00023600008,0.0029056284,0.0016284256,0.0027318748,0.0009471682,0.0008470018,0.0022350396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0135024795,0.00031671973,0.00021653292,0.0039302404,0.00086770026,0.001777146,0.0033549038,0.0014917552,0.0012608784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007353924,0.000119825614,0.94204646,0.00008148254,0.000023620052,0.0001964363,0.023483425,0.000044641594,0.00029246492,0.0009256683,0.02216394,0.010548628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026016653,0.000025273084,0.9615137,0.000046858146,0.000005470235,0.000092136965,0.025572315,0.00009161474,0.00014799886,0.000047419133,0.0124435155,0.000011011486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24651942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36429623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24651942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002628497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004866565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49016905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7046182124","doi":"","title":"Conference Opening The Management and Resolution of Cross Border Disputes as Canada/U.S. Enter the 21st Century","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Negotiation; Online dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution","score_opus":0.009548860026014697,"score_gpt":0.2447957324123971,"score_spread":0.23524687238638242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7046182124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06239859,0.02231754,0.0017089838,0.11861028,0.007226083,0.000269077,0.0004384067,0.00014456776,0.78688645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5999946,0.013193268,0.0018401392,0.022302503,0.0023039426,0.0001755806,0.0006389122,0.00011055307,0.35944045],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543035,0.00072995183,0.00009637133,0.00023760503,0.0014707835,0.0020350693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920785,0.00185262,0.00038143192,0.0002652449,0.0021504506,0.003271883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004275634,0.00031116002,0.0003706397,0.0015956439,0.025841752,0.01844689,0.0019813993,0.008042442,0.028493647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014299015,0.00031633466,0.0003782095,0.0031205097,0.0053203474,0.004674127,0.008369219,0.0073259263,0.0021081816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013940941,0.000119074546,0.0042553125,0.00022711528,0.000017590048,0.001250865,0.025838936,0.00081257056,0.0010182402,0.18812151,0.684183,0.09401641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013345015,0.000015158673,0.003435206,0.0001695797,0.000006257236,0.00005783767,0.022792613,0.00016845604,0.00020953461,0.005201148,0.9679082,0.000022595923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56282157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7815575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43717843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027972816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055810954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8795061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066986607","doi":"","title":"Judicial dispute resolution (JDR) new roles for judges in ensuring justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Dispute resolution; Variety (cybernetics); Economic Justice; Resolution (logic); Online dispute resolution","score_opus":0.032035192151470375,"score_gpt":0.2669444494409311,"score_spread":0.23490925728946072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7066986607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031211132,0.0137597,0.011423526,0.052878883,0.0030874556,0.00007966887,0.00004141464,0.000109601126,0.9154987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29381076,0.016342571,0.023914969,0.05158689,0.0040864805,0.0003183166,0.000103720115,0.00023359296,0.60960263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827188,0.0069208634,0.00069194374,0.0016292237,0.0064955167,0.0015434796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99379927,0.0034415992,0.0004330151,0.0007160815,0.0010837149,0.0005263267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0120317275,0.000311885,0.00028808523,0.00096858665,0.006262076,0.015672835,0.0015053914,0.005610917,0.008830699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012219788,0.0004921727,0.0005144167,0.0015054689,0.013929429,0.0083706,0.005213427,0.008169707,0.0021817975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035196836,0.000009675878,0.00013633305,0.000046661127,0.0000012542795,0.00009709325,0.002022485,0.0000809007,0.00012988003,0.9085908,0.06539436,0.023487179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009311993,0.000011847122,0.0003495103,0.00017603769,0.0000039021265,0.00027204267,0.0015075197,0.00025402693,0.00019041766,0.07579588,0.92141384,0.000015566318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023923272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04266941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023923272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008512872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010012081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06363064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067048409","doi":"","title":"Jasminka Kalajdzic on Class Action Reform","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Commission; Law reform; Action (physics); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.032774850052629714,"score_gpt":0.25226418296448283,"score_spread":0.21948933291185313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067048409","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002552523,0.042171597,0.0014240625,0.56508553,0.0054995567,0.000034516732,0.00009883775,0.00003858159,0.3830948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18873948,0.052735772,0.002367979,0.33077687,0.008523172,0.0002516957,0.0001188832,0.00014742365,0.4163387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591726,0.0010506564,0.00011555562,0.000607757,0.0015906902,0.00071819156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99574184,0.0020140333,0.00021101936,0.0002102175,0.0012216014,0.00060126773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00397684,0.00027895177,0.00039702005,0.0008212187,0.009564651,0.00601883,0.001155778,0.006060738,0.009867512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009490549,0.00030372766,0.00029675246,0.0010860659,0.008406865,0.004534887,0.0026670368,0.010714844,0.002494081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070027722,0.000014090718,0.000117831485,0.000028835313,0.0000017578902,0.00003327049,0.0007347726,0.000088780136,0.000037663503,0.68061477,0.31066307,0.0076581677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007912065,0.0000042349584,0.00047292703,0.00019235231,0.000004058455,0.000020217945,0.0004982758,0.00013101348,0.00008368892,0.06957312,0.9289974,0.000014810255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.108854234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1315258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108854234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016085712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015985398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21644127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067087574","doi":"","title":"La moto-taxi dans le transport collectif à Dakar (Sénégal) : entre stratégie de survie des acteurs, efficacité dans les déplacements et dérives","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Field (mathematics); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.01858071349748046,"score_gpt":0.23280561121059226,"score_spread":0.21422489771311182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067087574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96029663,0.0025932097,0.0011392557,0.003407803,0.000044283363,0.00006553813,0.0012767616,0.00003071567,0.031145765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819578,0.0014985473,0.0006274593,0.0000622457,0.000007393774,0.000023526829,0.00030672262,0.000011358857,0.01550507],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952805,0.00013045267,0.000022841148,0.000040791,0.000091419584,0.0001864296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893576,0.00023756448,0.0001987333,0.00004027559,0.00041257901,0.000175046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001215098,0.0004320296,0.00022415613,0.0016222694,0.002219505,0.0024856287,0.0007118922,0.00050376635,0.006377401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022326845,0.00020953917,0.0003074803,0.0036969674,0.0008158051,0.0016210111,0.0014881515,0.0009201996,0.0006499091],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009534182,0.0002024065,0.6457676,0.00091679936,0.00031093208,0.00196443,0.027245613,0.020098677,0.005180971,0.06997006,0.006752973,0.22063611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036957903,0.00064334506,0.7509046,0.0006585447,0.0003920603,0.0012112213,0.097857885,0.0135263065,0.0066393195,0.007966412,0.12003486,0.0001284752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2107067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32021508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2107067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005710286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006744996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4189605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067783211","doi":"","title":"The National Self-Represented Litigants Project: Identifying\\tand\\tMeeting the Needs of Self-Represented Litigants Final Report","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demographics; Focus group; Duty; Sample (material); Service (business); Data collection; Qualitative property","score_opus":0.04240969499671346,"score_gpt":0.2564825114815942,"score_spread":0.21407281648488072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067783211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98084956,0.00028545037,0.000447308,0.0030293837,0.00006958567,0.0003431671,0.00039571925,0.000019501076,0.014560317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98528033,0.0006353107,0.0007490975,0.00082328694,0.000016574106,0.00027889913,0.00040988735,0.000019336407,0.0117871715],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995576,0.0015752388,0.00011868371,0.00020891034,0.0012864636,0.0012346675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933414,0.0012700394,0.00042769688,0.00025354512,0.002621083,0.002086207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076079755,0.00025353752,0.00026934224,0.0013754442,0.010819724,0.0044499743,0.0019535534,0.0007637063,0.003933346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007147505,0.00031839908,0.00022139042,0.0017224031,0.004306825,0.0012420429,0.002810323,0.0012454772,0.0003515819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030195866,0.000060818245,0.032719612,0.00013608663,0.00000503907,0.0008839619,0.9357845,0.000042365435,0.00079504657,0.0019710348,0.012618923,0.014952416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023642713,0.000014439888,0.012117151,0.000063295716,0.0000022540119,0.0000726364,0.96859133,0.00004130441,0.000086186155,0.000073483156,0.018928427,0.0000072061894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7998529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90607595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7998529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031220583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06709557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40265155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070524428","doi":"","title":"OSF | 1-800-507-1434++ norton 360 support phone number norton","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phone; Mobile phone; Service (business); Phone call; Telephone line","score_opus":0.012742322395284488,"score_gpt":0.24972195767746608,"score_spread":0.23697963528218158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070524428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006688461,0.00010834469,0.0007270365,0.0002754061,0.00044299528,0.00009702948,0.0020000448,0.004315482,0.99136484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008636738,0.000068342655,0.00022063823,0.000066147804,0.000050771432,0.000021208629,0.0008015901,0.0006920212,0.9972156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952435,0.0000321217,0.000017261675,0.00011298668,0.00025253848,0.000060732244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985971,0.00013579076,0.00005631171,0.00016602263,0.0006137711,0.0004310067],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042261323,0.0012733423,0.0007953739,0.0011088358,0.0013066455,0.0033603276,0.0010497726,0.0010636279,0.9187549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016507745,0.00066212204,0.0004774914,0.00075088657,0.00030615873,0.0020923663,0.0011712456,0.000993116,0.9047877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057876605,0.00008297892,0.0002562689,0.000062642226,0.000002570394,0.000058477584,0.000035517085,0.000075019205,0.0013064467,0.0017465542,0.9290683,0.067247264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029650628,0.000056477802,0.00075811776,0.000044293087,0.000005419948,0.00009033841,0.00005154662,0.00023550379,0.00052680343,0.00027817834,0.9979128,0.000010923847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007775509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014327417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081245124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012211063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016491573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11588633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071268771","doi":"","title":"Securities Scholars' Comment Letter on Draft Whistleblower Award and Protection Act","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Securities Exchange Act of 1934; Supreme court; State (computer science); Section (typography); Securities fraud","score_opus":0.021310146260927337,"score_gpt":0.228401445765653,"score_spread":0.20709129950472566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071268771","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018545805,0.0010373457,0.0006875884,0.8986342,0.024305495,0.00014961294,0.00085790467,0.0003298878,0.072143435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016869841,0.0006744515,0.0004947056,0.88708824,0.007771304,0.00022641853,0.00028310684,0.00014065203,0.08645128],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882125,0.001868023,0.0013980375,0.0015108895,0.0049801306,0.0020304308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829196,0.009290377,0.0011819564,0.00065668055,0.005063391,0.00088800676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0083164275,0.0015703741,0.0012034029,0.0012666339,0.012526905,0.0072233574,0.0028828678,0.057183612,0.023216143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0438607,0.0012583565,0.0018667342,0.001600328,0.0036972398,0.0047840956,0.002552472,0.027649637,0.01609434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019774683,0.00001277702,0.0001328166,0.000020951404,0.0000021374526,0.00026186445,0.00040059528,0.00003186474,0.0001464512,0.010334584,0.9870847,0.001551509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004337197,0.00003653073,0.0007927499,0.00017209281,0.000013520304,0.00012996145,0.00085292436,0.00020696719,0.00046597634,0.004906048,0.9923193,0.00006053246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039359584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036949776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057183612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013677585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013978138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09923828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071270160","doi":"","title":"Singapore Convention Defences Based On Mediator's Misconduct: Articles 5.1(e) & (f)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aside; Convention; Arbitration; Mediation; Settlement (finance); Relevance (law)","score_opus":0.018827068510264108,"score_gpt":0.2330131840605176,"score_spread":0.2141861155502535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071270160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025825806,0.004410163,0.0031786184,0.16945921,0.0039838706,0.00033010298,0.0003758181,0.0002078775,0.7922284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4654247,0.0020399312,0.002141912,0.14854956,0.002115395,0.0005219853,0.00021128746,0.00014158274,0.37885362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97520226,0.006540938,0.0024071005,0.001998274,0.009735476,0.0041158786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98892295,0.005972411,0.0011952149,0.0009269335,0.0023287907,0.00065378106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019453773,0.00114964,0.0011955923,0.0016071575,0.01569413,0.018818332,0.004173384,0.04302299,0.015919825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03310757,0.0008470212,0.0018946346,0.0015937317,0.012130571,0.005133792,0.006844014,0.018781811,0.005152672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000490658,0.000040317726,0.001191488,0.00014258095,0.000048468693,0.002431645,0.009432172,0.00020060384,0.0007474278,0.8104179,0.16908367,0.0062147584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058832728,0.0000858842,0.0030702,0.00062487094,0.00008701284,0.0006179324,0.0045191874,0.00072294485,0.0026703172,0.053526323,0.93386793,0.00014852328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048057552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093651265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048057552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014397492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013646813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10446161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7082284802","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17162668","title":"ENHANCING FAIRNESS, EFFICIENCY, AND ACCESSIBILITY IN CANADA ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SYSTEM","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Journal of Communication (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint; Dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Cornerstone; Administrative law; Administration of justice; Economic Justice; Tribunal; Interoperability; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.02129168565803732,"score_gpt":0.241041534758097,"score_spread":0.21974984910005968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7082284802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35318285,0.0022149729,0.056789406,0.055628814,0.0002871266,0.00083686004,0.0007127607,0.0008034899,0.5295438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9572368,0.00043006218,0.01806052,0.00186906,0.00004192235,0.00008402204,0.000102690625,0.000042093812,0.022132806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97985363,0.004196685,0.00059830904,0.0011800637,0.009775556,0.0043958337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703333,0.008733397,0.0011620185,0.001713367,0.015095989,0.0029619266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013559987,0.00025559645,0.00038877316,0.0034989414,0.015126926,0.0137528265,0.0022064932,0.001801923,0.0068000564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04104793,0.00030567197,0.00045166546,0.0030441687,0.009375289,0.003060635,0.0060385456,0.0022114306,0.00037778285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006387905,0.00012610799,0.018555075,0.00018287881,0.000049116734,0.00024239106,0.011392589,0.012490779,0.0013676211,0.8026256,0.025788186,0.12711577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018778737,0.00019646998,0.103174575,0.0008347669,0.00026286527,0.00027382636,0.017936885,0.061341874,0.0055007203,0.24269703,0.5671086,0.00048463218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9670875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97992104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87714946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12285057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25271988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8913474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093623329","doi":"","title":"Judging in the Time of a Pandemic:\\nThe Impact of COVID-19 on Bail and Sentencing in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Insecta mundi","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Public health; China; Government (linguistics); Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pneumonia","score_opus":0.027708559094245216,"score_gpt":0.26738579637425913,"score_spread":0.23967723728001392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093623329","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028540187,0.009144668,0.00049363216,0.6967684,0.0062969686,0.00013974619,0.0008375708,0.000118039,0.25766078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40820596,0.013040297,0.001771946,0.34219,0.0014101145,0.00007343166,0.0007310309,0.00016653274,0.23241067],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98976433,0.0005989405,0.00032174104,0.0004407825,0.0050838175,0.003790454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98794484,0.0018382665,0.00039328824,0.00019170172,0.0060014063,0.0036305652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049263965,0.00040735016,0.00044114105,0.0013777366,0.02796478,0.0123907905,0.0032542339,0.009252277,0.009063479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020719768,0.000503149,0.0005787925,0.0017224031,0.0068682325,0.0033541913,0.0032999765,0.016203867,0.0009392922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056745776,0.00003791138,0.009390166,0.0001248753,0.000027461012,0.0019749778,0.011375698,0.0002924067,0.0005639481,0.11102088,0.83359134,0.03154353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003037806,0.000035139798,0.022390964,0.00047367188,0.000040695955,0.00034122757,0.024657654,0.00049759,0.0007496426,0.005915377,0.9447037,0.0001639237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9930428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99714714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12339585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12339585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2768124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8953038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093989690","doi":"","title":"Access to Justice in Canada:The Unrepresented Accused and the Role of the Trial Judge","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Pretext; Diafiltration; Hyporeflexia; Demotion; Articular cartilage damage","score_opus":0.02186785048368594,"score_gpt":0.20203799318080903,"score_spread":0.1801701426971231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093989690","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16344184,0.036802966,0.0017751348,0.44705057,0.0022296626,0.0002188852,0.0005633098,0.00011717868,0.34780043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87839746,0.01149841,0.0009514193,0.056386318,0.00040533056,0.00008725254,0.00015013116,0.00009302017,0.052030567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787315,0.002531609,0.0005093866,0.0013772483,0.005843684,0.011006492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771847,0.0057498496,0.0010081504,0.00041717128,0.0072647836,0.008375454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010275825,0.00048131237,0.0007901543,0.0026244423,0.057543762,0.019785132,0.004690203,0.013358084,0.01202912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04307425,0.0009212971,0.0005429421,0.00412324,0.023468925,0.005432902,0.009107404,0.015767835,0.0008197044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025020685,0.00016453094,0.025106387,0.00039865175,0.00007121889,0.0052421684,0.10766621,0.00070165755,0.0006908024,0.4682737,0.2935507,0.09788377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023120739,0.00012425889,0.07451502,0.0020785986,0.0002455872,0.0016349287,0.18824822,0.0028500208,0.00083870476,0.07732939,0.6512661,0.0006379678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99880457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8038347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19616535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.415735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93233424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094498605","doi":"","title":"9781000589931.pdf","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Universitetet i Oslo; European Commission","keywords":"Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Common law; Argumentation theory; Precedent; Human rights; Comparative law; Constitutional economics; Supreme court; Judicial independence","score_opus":0.014101659502418488,"score_gpt":0.22808182498932578,"score_spread":0.2139801654869073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094498605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017277391,0.0011578291,0.00083826034,0.000676616,0.00148017,0.000042597174,0.002226509,0.00082581973,0.9925795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006154803,0.0014610904,0.00062725553,0.00030455904,0.00027868437,0.000045714998,0.0019234953,0.0005651659,0.99417853],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994942,0.000054827116,0.000025800677,0.00006754097,0.0003092356,0.00004832638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986455,0.00037676113,0.00007158263,0.00016315134,0.00046479757,0.00027832203],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054458686,0.00081302645,0.0005868554,0.0023687761,0.0011276755,0.008264584,0.00094571227,0.0015181531,0.85495603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029792748,0.00043986057,0.00053328223,0.004583892,0.00054995413,0.0033282312,0.0027370292,0.0018225074,0.8363229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014767341,0.00001958218,0.000077683144,0.0001509074,0.000001992251,0.000031235282,0.000055335116,0.00005651817,0.00021114088,0.0038940045,0.8257894,0.16969745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018469198,0.000004298822,0.00012475128,0.00007884257,5.268743e-7,0.000025526959,0.000031087842,0.000018024977,0.00004459745,0.00049091247,0.99917716,0.0000024619126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015466698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002441795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14504397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008299189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095113774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20688754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7103390803","doi":"","title":"2020 Canada-U.S. Law Institute Experts' Meeting The United States and Canada: Outlook for Bilateral Relations in 2021 --- Welcom & Opening of the 2020 CUSLI Experts' Meeting","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics); Negotiation; Presentation (obstetrics)","score_opus":0.01404910893859913,"score_gpt":0.21647068661218571,"score_spread":0.2024215776735866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7103390803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058708605,0.015506897,0.0008900008,0.14608954,0.008323623,0.00022471005,0.0063822316,0.00034354857,0.8163685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031348694,0.005782505,0.0015524465,0.034128025,0.000480255,0.000091500624,0.0028008844,0.00011177498,0.9237039],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615073,0.00012584431,0.00004495744,0.000113575115,0.0019551523,0.0016097552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643743,0.00010015361,0.00005551427,0.000033276858,0.001873428,0.0015001652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022866693,0.00081650034,0.00032496522,0.002355047,0.012520183,0.008371808,0.0015773072,0.010625784,0.067373216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002996972,0.00042969052,0.00083518936,0.0023265833,0.0016228311,0.0020705075,0.0024371105,0.004361009,0.012510177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019415893,0.000026763593,0.0005025212,0.00004130271,0.0000040979894,0.000107884334,0.00015734429,0.00012928872,0.00017973068,0.02684656,0.9606897,0.011295307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050073854,0.0000045149254,0.0020899477,0.000079634454,0.0000052492665,0.000021982964,0.0008642862,0.00010119321,0.00012238204,0.0020294143,0.99465936,0.000017017326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9595049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98708165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.948286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051713984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17914031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37521303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7103428575","doi":"","title":"Canadian Law","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.01633050828744328,"score_gpt":0.20850627868345728,"score_spread":0.192175770396014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7103428575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006695351,0.0028303596,0.00034738713,0.010982128,0.0008523596,0.000073583986,0.0019104471,0.00013065014,0.9822036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012862281,0.002214334,0.00066163926,0.0068344814,0.00019954887,0.00004870538,0.0008576015,0.00008714919,0.97623426],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636793,0.00012520407,0.00009867593,0.0005791083,0.0020915018,0.0007375126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975962,0.00016105258,0.000052153948,0.0001657683,0.0017377688,0.0002868804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001149138,0.000739115,0.0005177907,0.0021547445,0.015446822,0.008288536,0.0021157858,0.0053552743,0.2033394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036758974,0.00065601384,0.0005555933,0.0032234525,0.0032055522,0.002178046,0.0018504214,0.0043253736,0.037205968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011136336,0.000013096831,0.0004268123,0.00006832543,0.000005003214,0.000109062275,0.00040412994,0.00006686761,0.00016218664,0.2011472,0.77509385,0.02249233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000212539,0.0000015863939,0.00039296894,0.000035187313,0.0000024502197,0.000019957768,0.00009905223,0.000033980923,0.00003199051,0.001655715,0.99771833,0.000006656375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95987236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97953737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2033394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04774504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08431874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.680238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106502248","doi":"10.1007/978-981-96-9748-9_8","title":"Arbitration","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Appeal; Dispute resolution; Mediation; Online dispute resolution; International arbitration","score_opus":0.01715680446504035,"score_gpt":0.21761643496666988,"score_spread":0.20045963050162952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106502248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003923075,0.0005751413,0.0043416717,0.00061089045,0.00024143804,0.000034545883,0.00006246003,0.0000634397,0.99367803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014319128,0.0005183585,0.0018117939,0.00042225537,0.00012981913,0.00005062261,0.000101697085,0.000050981416,0.9825953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898833,0.00020375468,0.000040787327,0.00020619524,0.00043959168,0.000121364326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952054,0.00012336075,0.000022158236,0.00013860644,0.00015506348,0.000040367173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011175276,0.0005985156,0.0004749989,0.0014589353,0.0025444562,0.0052858572,0.0013602459,0.0018642419,0.1673514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025092117,0.00033450045,0.00041092944,0.0010166551,0.002123645,0.0037480032,0.0024389094,0.0021768617,0.055887688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011249741,0.000018173616,0.000042896645,0.00003544508,0.0000025198249,0.0000308639,0.00024026434,0.00015671486,0.00021235026,0.8653842,0.080006406,0.05385894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036811477,0.000007823513,0.00010270745,0.00004611955,0.0000021835488,0.00007599036,0.00009521133,0.00035214762,0.0003096683,0.15495442,0.84404486,0.0000051656834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023926948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038069405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1673514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002047218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016612334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55984616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106517081","doi":"10.1007/978-981-96-9748-9_5","title":"Mediation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Process (computing); Party-directed mediation; Dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Alternative dispute resolution; Conciliation; Dispute mechanism","score_opus":0.014487532403857573,"score_gpt":0.21408536881794513,"score_spread":0.19959783641408754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106517081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003022342,0.00029339924,0.0027051875,0.00056590745,0.00017578546,0.000037608468,0.000049706472,0.00007298355,0.9957973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018105332,0.0004406081,0.001550281,0.0007184815,0.0001105281,0.00008505632,0.00011874626,0.000069948735,0.9788011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876153,0.00027641983,0.000040537518,0.00025681703,0.00048019335,0.000184587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993197,0.00016192366,0.000028349661,0.00023312225,0.00018381332,0.000073078176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011185304,0.00072318263,0.00047480338,0.0014282396,0.0032819908,0.0066887946,0.0020575663,0.0028158647,0.2265785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032132983,0.00044570272,0.00052521954,0.00095178763,0.0028325284,0.0050337203,0.0038696812,0.0029623446,0.075307526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009927527,0.00002140813,0.000043314827,0.000036239795,0.0000024894578,0.00005657028,0.00039977347,0.00007031019,0.00021525056,0.91328084,0.05663498,0.02922875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060549505,0.000008433688,0.000107404994,0.0000734949,0.000003863198,0.00014669774,0.00035727822,0.00021605,0.00047574763,0.15617071,0.8424273,0.000006845211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003893613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005390066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2265785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025510509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024221174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106540202","doi":"10.1007/978-981-96-9748-9_12","title":"Intelligence Augmentation in Alternative Dispute Resolution","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Normative; Mediation; Dispute resolution; Arbitration; Online dispute resolution; Resolution (logic)","score_opus":0.028411072920053123,"score_gpt":0.26137902809309416,"score_spread":0.23296795517304103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106540202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012295534,0.0048783785,0.3564848,0.0033257597,0.0007510005,0.0001293638,0.00009445541,0.00028100025,0.6217597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6150716,0.004539104,0.21324942,0.0007674969,0.0007556995,0.00030803503,0.000313753,0.00025149912,0.16474338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807763,0.0008521225,0.00007384516,0.00016622705,0.00071284326,0.00011733776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969217,0.0021549128,0.000097433134,0.00054458756,0.00023442307,0.0000468788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023276363,0.00049910124,0.0005440888,0.00092600717,0.0009967814,0.0041173077,0.0016620094,0.0013731446,0.015975777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065668616,0.0004460944,0.00054406,0.0014824161,0.0030195494,0.008147512,0.0021514283,0.00248158,0.0017723932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024247862,0.000035444195,0.00006369997,0.000047367284,0.0000036485344,0.00004382082,0.00023141259,0.0042556385,0.00021084002,0.9120399,0.0044641495,0.07857988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010209003,0.00002124592,0.00013549127,0.00007479548,0.000008599122,0.00013328536,0.00017558585,0.032314863,0.0007735964,0.90999687,0.056343652,0.000011708253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012674809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014456786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015975777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012978832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086625956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053444266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112518514","doi":"","title":"Conference Speakers","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.017536813700435885,"score_gpt":0.2504317207808617,"score_spread":0.2328949070804258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112518514","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023342276,0.011191537,0.000978481,0.13922672,0.5373437,0.001303598,0.002635653,0.00036238972,0.30462375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009766386,0.0046530673,0.00067365344,0.026810532,0.084888175,0.0011342708,0.0015636614,0.00030356413,0.8702067],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997658,0.00028856704,0.000079992235,0.00031612025,0.0010688613,0.00058839057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99042296,0.00079019583,0.00024162543,0.00016231218,0.0038839052,0.0044989195],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004065212,0.0013702373,0.00094248395,0.0026421153,0.0059635444,0.008800409,0.0018347735,0.007036444,0.30668473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009315437,0.00049923325,0.00095816486,0.0016962006,0.000665467,0.0023324993,0.0038392541,0.006553217,0.09699309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005010572,0.000029597384,0.000056533434,0.000054499735,0.0000019190968,0.000049892576,0.000049048336,0.000018642855,0.00012432228,0.00087576814,0.99050623,0.008183543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024806477,0.000013805303,0.00045250397,0.00010481953,0.0000030651677,0.00002022677,0.0003083751,0.000044245106,0.00006188482,0.0005469106,0.99841213,0.0000072414573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067500905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022667954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30668473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039864425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00714945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9889301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113026269","doi":"","title":"英美法國家對吹哨者合法爆料行為之認定：評最高法院98年臺上字第1042號判決","year":2011,"lang":"zh","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Commission; Enforcement; Duty; Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Cause of action; Loyalty","score_opus":0.04991706626873926,"score_gpt":0.2237429062129604,"score_spread":0.17382583994422113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113026269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038135793,0.0029906274,0.006607639,0.088262096,0.0011619173,0.000110938025,0.000257825,0.00010995572,0.8623631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7587149,0.0038393077,0.010073116,0.010101615,0.0005763032,0.00031501253,0.0002865836,0.0000880383,0.21600507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947864,0.0019919912,0.00020358032,0.000643866,0.0018347792,0.0005393104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99478096,0.00235129,0.0004044459,0.00019576526,0.0016927698,0.0005747434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062470855,0.00043116556,0.0005204267,0.0028892679,0.010267288,0.018964166,0.0012979927,0.0030088513,0.018397525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0100081265,0.00042412427,0.00050092617,0.0046898574,0.011739957,0.014412785,0.002741737,0.0043158126,0.0027535902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011099008,0.000042114007,0.0010516616,0.00004000174,0.000008236755,0.000042167296,0.0060748453,0.00033943244,0.000062896834,0.9564401,0.023000477,0.012886997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004417483,0.00003912718,0.004403725,0.0003948309,0.000036946712,0.000074526586,0.044364292,0.0011082508,0.0007644291,0.5382354,0.4104732,0.000061010756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042303886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030733885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042303886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015231303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023823299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11051136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115924808","doi":"10.5287/ora-2akw212ag","title":"To what extent will the proposed model for an online civil court in the UK promote access to justice? A critical review and comparison with the Canadian and failed Dutch models","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislature; Legislation; High Court; Agency (philosophy); Work (physics); Commission; Context (archaeology); The Internet","score_opus":0.0865023167132343,"score_gpt":0.3231545672398388,"score_spread":0.23665225052660452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115924808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049237646,0.048437223,0.013329174,0.36664018,0.0036325338,0.0004612399,0.0008184484,0.00008390459,0.51735973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8997146,0.038344886,0.008409166,0.021934334,0.00085749273,0.00038132563,0.00019309169,0.00008954123,0.03007549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796743,0.007374981,0.0010773056,0.0017389334,0.007109634,0.0030249024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9505101,0.031763535,0.002470897,0.001901007,0.011462223,0.0018922618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020417254,0.00049156137,0.00075316976,0.005843076,0.007872349,0.028639294,0.0042593936,0.011310388,0.015224088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059983138,0.0004991122,0.00086766883,0.006926551,0.03033042,0.015469172,0.003667334,0.007232897,0.0022139277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024595402,0.000012470336,0.0005405738,0.00041934382,0.000009913984,0.00015004081,0.0035705513,0.00033854018,0.00003327304,0.9737177,0.009270753,0.0119123245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014551647,0.00012427682,0.009037399,0.009896188,0.00025334244,0.00077640946,0.05509836,0.004685216,0.0005030001,0.4848004,0.4344995,0.00018047594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42549723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5187159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9355788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06442117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07398018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84604114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116378322","doi":"10.5287/ora-nr4j7yxm8","title":"How do theories of access to justice, judicial economy, and behaviour modification explain developments in the class actions debate from 1970 onward in England and Canada?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Redress; Interpretation (philosophy); Class action; Supreme court; Class (philosophy); Economic Justice; Normative; Civil procedure","score_opus":0.03935358463069893,"score_gpt":0.2674952702575487,"score_spread":0.22814168562684978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116378322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30612317,0.012340084,0.010343678,0.118707806,0.00041884396,0.00012037515,0.0005992121,0.00008034475,0.5512665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778245,0.0024033198,0.00087310595,0.002532869,0.000059157333,0.000024657527,0.00007647821,0.000039064755,0.016166886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923165,0.0012485815,0.00013801697,0.0010053825,0.002085138,0.0032063478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891227,0.0040809754,0.0012148195,0.0007491134,0.0033480367,0.0014843759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061824834,0.00037185554,0.00079383876,0.0031892783,0.012348812,0.014396889,0.0030286945,0.0035264448,0.009960042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018847357,0.00037417567,0.00054883247,0.0044431034,0.040436834,0.010303301,0.003157018,0.0051615625,0.00051752274],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016827526,0.000018668841,0.0057119573,0.000050747654,0.0000111575555,0.00010866849,0.027969163,0.0005377052,0.000055474073,0.9503544,0.003876293,0.011288944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006549807,0.000041521133,0.066903815,0.00091501616,0.00007260999,0.000176367,0.10401501,0.0043459535,0.00043568134,0.49384993,0.3289557,0.0002229256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9808599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9835345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16278195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16278195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11744656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97105426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117240661","doi":"10.46914/2959-4197-2025-1-4-134-142","title":"The role of participatory conciliation procedures in civil litigation","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Relevance (law); Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Settlement (finance); Civil procedure; Legislature; Citizen journalism","score_opus":0.018885177937269782,"score_gpt":0.2727344246664023,"score_spread":0.2538492467291325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117240661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28863916,0.003861721,0.3241258,0.011507615,0.00032934753,0.002111512,0.00007061296,0.00030988027,0.36904442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95856416,0.00047209449,0.034503352,0.00042323564,0.00006624106,0.0004490009,0.00001530387,0.000026559228,0.0054800278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8881672,0.09289225,0.0017331693,0.003700567,0.0093102325,0.0041965046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.899907,0.07474607,0.00920948,0.010154853,0.0042966213,0.0016860024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057047147,0.00055738766,0.00043890768,0.0031645033,0.013213703,0.007036517,0.002931642,0.0030697214,0.0050657056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07166203,0.00052547664,0.00050730404,0.0030520193,0.025957804,0.0072680395,0.011026173,0.0025368943,0.0007398394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017457444,0.0002617955,0.0051919445,0.0005555811,0.0000453304,0.0006423607,0.06657706,0.0043735774,0.0021464403,0.7279957,0.001849063,0.19018655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014222403,0.0013685649,0.016424067,0.0016916429,0.000103022874,0.0013840206,0.06639742,0.010079441,0.0076362854,0.6582219,0.23628165,0.00026982743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003607812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005411659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057047147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051577804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0135176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30169773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118001701","doi":"10.30833/ltpr.2025.11.13.4.187","title":"A Study on Measures to Strengthen the Automobile Insurance Dispute Resolution System in Preparation for the Autonomous Driving Era - Focusing on the Quasi-Judicial Functions of the Civil Resolution Tribunal (CRT) in British Columbia, Canada -","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory & Practice Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Tribunal; Resolution (logic); Online dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute mechanism","score_opus":0.020367079520494998,"score_gpt":0.2724454872583959,"score_spread":0.2520784077379009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118001701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95660466,0.0006933844,0.0003740079,0.002150732,0.00004947365,0.0013886036,0.00019936055,0.000013753306,0.03852593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903984,0.00035352033,0.0009864867,0.0011359786,0.000014968385,0.0003836589,0.0001200379,0.0000046948176,0.0066023087],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98688424,0.0047726515,0.00058539433,0.0006723136,0.0035844482,0.0035009556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9661668,0.012521215,0.0036574157,0.0011290004,0.012833149,0.0036923974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012120655,0.00033403997,0.00045080174,0.0028261086,0.0086388225,0.005087299,0.002576151,0.0019998194,0.0028334942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038819857,0.0003722551,0.00040688523,0.0054909773,0.003826228,0.0023885258,0.002235078,0.0026239331,0.0002461885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016195624,0.008219661,0.44908702,0.0016007756,0.00027981313,0.000834468,0.08369738,0.002502677,0.0047213654,0.07879692,0.016005812,0.3526345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026408496,0.0017456841,0.8882529,0.0004171302,0.00016413114,0.00008654731,0.07900461,0.00076122175,0.0013936041,0.0012823364,0.02658942,0.000038357368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87112755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9666613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12887245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06762929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14329332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49068713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7119312809","doi":"","title":"Class Actions in Canada: Cases, Notes, and Materials, 3rd Edition","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Casebook; Class (philosophy); Legislature; Commission; Class action; Resource (disambiguation); Certification","score_opus":0.025553865617722566,"score_gpt":0.23914405623650156,"score_spread":0.21359019061877899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7119312809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029930188,0.046474885,0.002001458,0.024651337,0.0067613493,0.000773174,0.01817699,0.0008239657,0.8973438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019563785,0.043032426,0.0023337372,0.010480801,0.0010977193,0.00055907114,0.0075501106,0.00035124892,0.9150311],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570423,0.00013506041,0.0001464988,0.00019514767,0.0030611388,0.000757998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956398,0.00076990685,0.00018656424,0.00026664854,0.0026752732,0.0004617241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019008793,0.0012500553,0.00066227344,0.006754414,0.01012565,0.008037266,0.003648773,0.004267369,0.05869508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067963535,0.0009787645,0.00074192823,0.013746399,0.0041129147,0.0020609,0.0023359326,0.0024298988,0.01632561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025666807,0.000011805043,0.00012033015,0.000055416444,9.915832e-7,0.000043646414,0.00022308667,0.00012214456,0.00004549217,0.008934456,0.9773916,0.013048457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019364234,0.0000022132247,0.001258453,0.0001647437,0.0000021570354,0.00003547873,0.00035414536,0.000060400405,0.000038547583,0.00086753786,0.9972012,0.000013264742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98509556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9902604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10342049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10342049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14646515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7503717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7119398680","doi":"","title":"AS FERRAMENTAS DE ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTIONS (ODR) E OS NOVOS INSTRUMENTOS TECNOLÓGICOS EM BUSCA DA EFETIVIDADE DO DIREITO DE ACESSO À JUSTIÇA NO BRASIL","year":2024,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; European union; Third wave; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)","score_opus":0.02604512494416767,"score_gpt":0.26964367572431175,"score_spread":0.24359855078014409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7119398680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08149332,0.098987825,0.079119995,0.03177004,0.0013532435,0.0007098645,0.00081457564,0.00054604845,0.7052051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.873392,0.06360474,0.03703158,0.0017805479,0.00061417953,0.00037315357,0.0003155713,0.00013936637,0.022748813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746909,0.014212828,0.001523173,0.0020401424,0.00658399,0.00094896153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9641961,0.023191553,0.0031989494,0.005243115,0.00365589,0.0005144034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017665254,0.00047081633,0.0006612228,0.007851936,0.004541694,0.012902569,0.0016924993,0.0022933981,0.0048271487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04469164,0.00045210033,0.00062657625,0.0117642805,0.0131791355,0.009368967,0.0037237443,0.0020704584,0.000992087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025994408,0.000033545082,0.0030279513,0.0017786408,0.000019378462,0.00023664918,0.020493245,0.000585992,0.00059981947,0.7347843,0.004613043,0.2338014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024926403,0.00006314893,0.007138385,0.0058942363,0.00010658166,0.00077170326,0.020608198,0.0013842734,0.0017269853,0.15682916,0.8053913,0.000061185325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028703043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038312975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028703043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008761338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017504964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0934239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7120691628","doi":"","title":"The arbitration clause: a comparative perspective of the Brazilian and Canadian law","year":2013,"lang":"pt","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations  (Universidade de São Paulo)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Indignation; Meaning (existential)","score_opus":0.010675600669618477,"score_gpt":0.2245654758208591,"score_spread":0.2138898751512406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7120691628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028376061,0.014313531,0.0011269292,0.02437671,0.00017664285,0.000037863905,0.00018186952,0.000013607861,0.9313967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9010057,0.014153977,0.0012672023,0.006022426,0.00021100588,0.000077245226,0.0001713631,0.000046402572,0.077044696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930883,0.0012201937,0.000119336844,0.0003938409,0.0027100213,0.002468218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955244,0.001425733,0.00026961384,0.00016848126,0.0022447892,0.00036701976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037496754,0.00055897544,0.000686719,0.0054261764,0.016409665,0.013978111,0.0021224027,0.0041839066,0.01003468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010660233,0.00043017676,0.00067930407,0.00952482,0.014991797,0.0046914,0.0031332984,0.003862787,0.0005090587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007595347,0.000004326196,0.00035334483,0.000024354926,0.00000285973,0.0000707248,0.0041628876,0.0000913271,0.00004274468,0.98784524,0.003589424,0.0038049752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042403477,0.000024432145,0.014418713,0.00077065395,0.00008101861,0.00029732333,0.036334828,0.0017650155,0.00027113289,0.19631238,0.74957645,0.00010557865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9754617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97348094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11134538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11134538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08250114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80787104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124152087","doi":"10.70763/f5cfbc876972bd0d031c8abc37344c28","title":"Some Thoughts on Group Process at IPA Conventions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clio s Psyche","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Group (periodic table); Group process; Process analysis","score_opus":0.02805949675846992,"score_gpt":0.2839938967885282,"score_spread":0.2559344000300583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124152087","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005488948,0.014957026,0.020839749,0.6020465,0.009515421,0.000115251496,0.00010394099,0.00013381257,0.34679946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57795596,0.02671577,0.029623302,0.20785259,0.022654543,0.0009757368,0.00021400515,0.00069643784,0.13331166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806676,0.013251504,0.00034964288,0.0010138666,0.0029909308,0.001726541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98923606,0.0065032025,0.00061100844,0.0008294572,0.0017762361,0.0010440629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014110138,0.00089294737,0.0005881907,0.0023571318,0.01284626,0.020630645,0.0035018008,0.014466829,0.018368734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025384083,0.000545839,0.0015368096,0.0040955683,0.03385609,0.032117363,0.006394453,0.019757684,0.00267056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011485132,0.000014147581,0.0001427338,0.000058851758,0.000004132854,0.00013197445,0.0092669325,0.00016347322,0.000044606015,0.95316005,0.03289606,0.0041055265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016161799,0.000036712852,0.00036963267,0.0003519884,0.000004454225,0.00012584847,0.019115644,0.00039736493,0.0001192097,0.57635283,0.40307826,0.00003181235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073558125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057790847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020630645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065760887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030363319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07462239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125654099","doi":"10.1111/caje.70035","title":"Innis Lecture: Algorithmic pricing and competition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Competition (biology); Collusion; Competition law; Game theory","score_opus":0.05257844319458678,"score_gpt":0.1731359265688145,"score_spread":0.12055748337422771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125654099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011414929,0.05092662,0.03445628,0.2216141,0.019748067,0.000044938,0.00037725226,0.00026627615,0.66115165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46938074,0.048300073,0.024561558,0.010601288,0.035528753,0.0001584975,0.00045060198,0.00044477166,0.41057378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986345,0.00047708195,0.000053842028,0.00029217385,0.0003882257,0.0001541752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958811,0.0030445035,0.00012376386,0.00015702257,0.0004133817,0.00038015778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024012534,0.0008651534,0.00079889817,0.001229301,0.0020636262,0.005573761,0.00071239506,0.0023933505,0.035404656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066911397,0.00029221436,0.00064405653,0.001193509,0.003943925,0.003602249,0.0014818049,0.0043085306,0.00458643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041479656,0.000058392634,0.00040242725,0.00009402813,0.000023347711,0.000064869906,0.00014317656,0.0054641264,0.00023313503,0.82976544,0.12816511,0.035544503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026669555,0.000034691166,0.0006914473,0.00026617124,0.000017740544,0.00008269296,0.00016692048,0.015848419,0.00031125636,0.6933409,0.28918087,0.00003222302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077581974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074349116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99279094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00720904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002953611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11844039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126626565","doi":"","title":"Strengthening Courtroom Integrity in Indonesia: Addressing Technological and Security Challenges Through Global Best Practice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Best practice; Order (exchange); Face (sociological concept); State (computer science); Strengths and weaknesses; Scope (computer science); Supreme court; Legislature","score_opus":0.04605571390753531,"score_gpt":0.31942351621420406,"score_spread":0.27336780230666874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126626565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41211042,0.023514865,0.037665304,0.13043474,0.0010687973,0.00055989734,0.0001395793,0.00046587505,0.39404052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687544,0.0061488715,0.013877617,0.0027975123,0.000080472164,0.000062973384,0.000042777716,0.000049935243,0.008185378],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923866,0.0033740718,0.00071019615,0.000713655,0.0019055163,0.00091008545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913129,0.0024278793,0.0018725349,0.001168915,0.0017756165,0.0014421239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008729756,0.00040066798,0.00036174592,0.0021281,0.007357905,0.0154995145,0.0022165088,0.0021596567,0.003960752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010354896,0.00035383357,0.00029447692,0.0023022199,0.0073051015,0.006599953,0.0065106144,0.0039441325,0.0007356124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062722786,0.00072006386,0.04767688,0.0015601787,0.00007645306,0.0025666347,0.056741703,0.0035985229,0.004255786,0.12126022,0.019761566,0.74171925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039964758,0.00033271094,0.11337093,0.007382825,0.0001736712,0.0020834333,0.28612837,0.006066026,0.008722973,0.08072502,0.494744,0.00023012601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007787372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018420674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0154995145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065321317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023623114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047394156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127168517","doi":"10.24144/2307-3322.2025.92.2.25","title":"Modern digital practices of labor dispute resolution: theoretical and legal aspects and prospects of implementation in Ukraine","year":2025,"lang":"uk","type":"article","venue":"Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Relevance (law); Online dispute resolution; Work (physics); Dispute mechanism; Alternative dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Resolution (logic)","score_opus":0.007152353392164218,"score_gpt":0.24998664206084023,"score_spread":0.242834288668676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127168517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6047449,0.14497773,0.030927341,0.02603134,0.00032301538,0.00025114475,0.00021237094,0.00012964183,0.19240248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9607731,0.028403668,0.0065959007,0.0006923551,0.00004755209,0.0000678832,0.000058627284,0.000008570309,0.0033523461],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573153,0.0024290835,0.00037538874,0.000296463,0.0008437612,0.0003238528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959124,0.0021885582,0.00085368636,0.00038995853,0.0004464882,0.00020880441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040850732,0.00014959286,0.00024671058,0.0025993192,0.0030802623,0.0061377026,0.0010956331,0.00089649035,0.001993517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005964777,0.00020814649,0.00026561317,0.0032712156,0.00527932,0.004528279,0.005148435,0.00087338476,0.00021154582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042821834,0.00017142354,0.019637441,0.002200999,0.000033683024,0.0012271208,0.06263992,0.0021893594,0.0008285478,0.41368946,0.0017540273,0.49558514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031123807,0.0002565228,0.07582908,0.0070131267,0.00007068485,0.0020120807,0.1588084,0.0044203973,0.002539532,0.14762405,0.6013243,0.00007070258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007832524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060191927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007832524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064122095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008657865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046524048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128177316","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i2.265","title":"The Doctrine of Cy Près in Ontario Class Actions: Toward a Consistent, Principled, and Transparent Approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Doctrine; Class (philosophy); Nexus (standard); Class action; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.231953379596366,"score_gpt":0.2827192996514638,"score_spread":0.05076592005509781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128177316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0296955,0.048944887,0.04732561,0.14549053,0.0015004562,0.0004834706,0.00041276874,0.00012932291,0.72601736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85277873,0.023886759,0.023904812,0.017684035,0.0008808956,0.00032672405,0.00010066314,0.00004777171,0.08038956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806191,0.0045073144,0.00086573034,0.0013137257,0.010665262,0.0020288562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992423,0.0030426274,0.0006880258,0.00042548013,0.0031170084,0.00030379868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013217802,0.00037206334,0.00046884283,0.0023417773,0.009790267,0.01007256,0.0027042185,0.00476663,0.0013700168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017007593,0.00070372864,0.00043580064,0.002457106,0.021389253,0.0033201121,0.0025778802,0.005715766,0.00023330553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004024148,0.0000025811592,0.00026202167,0.00007832058,0.0000033563424,0.000046226818,0.0022536546,0.0003125169,0.00009804275,0.98226017,0.0070159733,0.0076630027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003855839,0.00002967286,0.0045025344,0.00067747827,0.000049834827,0.00007839012,0.0034816554,0.0014026188,0.0005929345,0.27618763,0.71287006,0.00008864392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89233106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93542665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107668936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.090599775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16924909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6573504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128178239","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v9i1_133","title":"Le Traitement du Lien de Causalité Dans le Cadre du Recours Collectif","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Opposition (politics); Liability; Substantive law; Collective action; Context (archaeology); Civil procedure","score_opus":0.020613348846831157,"score_gpt":0.22907877997759923,"score_spread":0.20846543113076807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128178239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0628061,0.110638246,0.06012803,0.09928229,0.0027216868,0.00031419142,0.0013601298,0.0003883655,0.66236097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8688764,0.028475149,0.012774151,0.006153413,0.001256812,0.00010734481,0.00034356036,0.00008727071,0.08192588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843465,0.0040844968,0.00054642506,0.001463013,0.008162959,0.0013964622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682515,0.015431454,0.0021906001,0.0023367014,0.011348542,0.00044112146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015270856,0.00046693286,0.00065797335,0.0053815986,0.0059973756,0.010095436,0.0022098792,0.0028264232,0.006194739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031914335,0.0005546509,0.0007946797,0.003782842,0.012256026,0.0035742891,0.0015625538,0.0051201405,0.000531648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018619901,0.000008899436,0.0028106624,0.00031919184,0.00005569367,0.00022898514,0.002106398,0.0011903448,0.00033779224,0.93829185,0.01614695,0.038484592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049081395,0.00005329427,0.03095138,0.0016553419,0.0002210887,0.00043624328,0.003024244,0.0029986892,0.002070509,0.16091478,0.79742765,0.00019765414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8593547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90090585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14064533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040847257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062072787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29636896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128179810","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v9i2.385","title":"“Paradise Lost”?: Rethinking Quebec’s Reputation as a Haven for Class Actions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Authorization; Reputation; Pessimism; Deterrence theory; New class","score_opus":0.06191352893827361,"score_gpt":0.30511492935750684,"score_spread":0.24320140041923322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128179810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06643795,0.20295818,0.0015948113,0.36056468,0.0057803695,0.00022329109,0.0015130442,0.00013083807,0.36079678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7958351,0.044103343,0.0015931292,0.06872292,0.0011470153,0.00008860544,0.0004190647,0.00008742037,0.08800343],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99139786,0.002031159,0.00031274965,0.0006521104,0.0037864696,0.0018196238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96931654,0.008453145,0.0013088124,0.0010364875,0.017650645,0.0022343763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0131558385,0.00027080454,0.000502324,0.0030468686,0.011214668,0.0121052945,0.0030169694,0.004724538,0.006044774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022396106,0.00034606928,0.00046349916,0.0030365416,0.005639876,0.0028035494,0.0013270804,0.005103836,0.0004395996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015118925,0.00006832523,0.008216303,0.000917098,0.000093609575,0.0008013899,0.0061889035,0.0008187662,0.0008590909,0.33413315,0.5280324,0.11971983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068176814,0.0000427142,0.021740392,0.0017178517,0.00010859646,0.00013759492,0.003031383,0.00054067024,0.000516123,0.004279847,0.9677119,0.00010466832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13869953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13869953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17770201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128181469","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i2.467","title":"Some Comparisons Between Class Actions in Canada and The U.S.: Securities Class Actions, Certification, and Costs","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Control (management); New class","score_opus":0.04779290514284004,"score_gpt":0.26040220958000737,"score_spread":0.21260930443716733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128181469","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08416769,0.47099873,0.0017542138,0.05765003,0.0026645248,0.00038918306,0.01772921,0.00012684116,0.36451963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71177685,0.2269254,0.0026711973,0.014231557,0.0009875998,0.00020600262,0.008974533,0.00012186421,0.034104988],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98400015,0.0011792268,0.0007395782,0.0005015464,0.01151434,0.0020651347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92184967,0.014643759,0.003415218,0.0007138643,0.057697963,0.0016795589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011503387,0.0005009314,0.00066175166,0.029777972,0.005967396,0.00824098,0.0027454786,0.0016744831,0.00391132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040539276,0.0004058888,0.0010133991,0.04150721,0.0025816814,0.0018777237,0.0009898334,0.002561709,0.00022540688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028930957,0.000090448266,0.050977767,0.004001401,0.00033829798,0.00031801817,0.0064411946,0.0031361163,0.00055429223,0.26105028,0.42794234,0.2448605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004833308,0.00008030817,0.31493706,0.003073171,0.0004967574,0.00010935804,0.0072630723,0.00096498977,0.00078014855,0.0063175736,0.6657567,0.00017247774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99105513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116511784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.116511784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16214922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8453561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128182976","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v10i1-2.81","title":"Ontario’s Class Proceedings Fund: Separating Fact from Fiction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Action (physics); Third party; Disbursement; Sustainability","score_opus":0.11657417075270887,"score_gpt":0.29319725561960963,"score_spread":0.17662308486690076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128182976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014229136,0.34302717,0.0034797394,0.2511541,0.008637852,0.0002126186,0.0006823523,0.00007914409,0.37849784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5100951,0.28319272,0.0066885315,0.047445737,0.0038951105,0.00018676,0.0007134229,0.00015304331,0.14762953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98754233,0.0018023447,0.0006252286,0.00060566794,0.0078065046,0.0016179234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731698,0.01072648,0.0020752014,0.0011052097,0.011186307,0.0017369078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011360268,0.00036479032,0.00042572364,0.005133339,0.011635861,0.009866524,0.002013197,0.0034978397,0.005358936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031657632,0.00033434326,0.0004243131,0.006321753,0.015329146,0.004658761,0.0021547864,0.0026104604,0.0005631775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036239464,0.000014035259,0.0024381105,0.0017270136,0.000025632497,0.00042608674,0.013802746,0.00027248164,0.00033499362,0.5056992,0.32803828,0.14718516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044095746,0.0000049943064,0.0036016684,0.0010615377,0.000015099157,0.000047426525,0.0023008035,0.000056847388,0.00011221774,0.005456902,0.98732144,0.000016644179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96148735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98302436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11950163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11950163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23788773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86704904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128184417","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i2.383","title":"Book Review: <i>Class Actions in Canada: The Promise and Reality of Access to Justice</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.07643526671799572,"score_gpt":0.3169601246635312,"score_spread":0.24052485794553546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128184417","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039026552,0.56373394,0.00029736676,0.21935235,0.06997287,0.00014506471,0.0037675342,0.00016353892,0.14217706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01079528,0.5849448,0.0007582655,0.10276055,0.02121515,0.0001767622,0.002801007,0.00021499845,0.2763332],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994352,0.00025176507,0.00019893229,0.00027565227,0.004324366,0.0005974184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733417,0.0030621272,0.0009706866,0.00032869284,0.02051828,0.0017784622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002858368,0.0011624824,0.0014801394,0.007303092,0.004699737,0.008822998,0.0034984297,0.0059689716,0.037074354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016922066,0.0006675069,0.0008438669,0.016143752,0.0035204613,0.0021225107,0.0012570914,0.0058235917,0.00760538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027443743,0.0000014545809,0.000032573455,0.00016451138,0.0000028468748,0.000006346142,0.000017494209,0.00001642608,0.0000071677596,0.0009475363,0.99193734,0.00686358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004488903,0.000002709359,0.0006498507,0.00075289776,0.0000142028375,0.000020599622,0.00007948935,0.000015287127,0.000014135558,0.00033846503,0.99809605,0.000011757622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9452562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98309267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05988662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05988662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19413081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43450987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128184842","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i1.219","title":"The Certification of Competition-Related Class Actions in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Certification; Control (management); World class; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.03175589741554505,"score_gpt":0.24031039925888725,"score_spread":0.2085545018433422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128184842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17378226,0.2588864,0.0044667013,0.18938503,0.008358898,0.0016826034,0.012053407,0.00048738075,0.3508973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.804007,0.078434,0.00450761,0.029530762,0.0008791639,0.00039652784,0.004715104,0.00015422914,0.077375524],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9658702,0.0026297558,0.0022516982,0.0014398417,0.023468338,0.0043401853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7942991,0.019210218,0.007552017,0.0022675914,0.16844863,0.008222426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030990098,0.0004055595,0.0008881527,0.013425628,0.009405163,0.009474179,0.0049582063,0.005260086,0.0030056087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07273269,0.00082092814,0.0007407961,0.013782131,0.0032422843,0.0017951066,0.0017202466,0.0039304346,0.00038848602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030702722,0.00020729381,0.03782158,0.0038377785,0.00016759706,0.0005379534,0.0061944956,0.0027511695,0.0015391983,0.10960596,0.53744245,0.29958746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008365478,0.00009304123,0.14501937,0.0024455646,0.00018621178,0.0001371239,0.0026686164,0.0012693007,0.001275518,0.0020070733,0.8446413,0.0001730977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99532133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14375666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14375666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41946545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128187074","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i1.027","title":"Absent Foreign Claimants in Canadian Class Actions: Where to After <i>Airia Brands</i> ?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Class (philosophy); Tort; Test (biology); Exclusive jurisdiction; Personal jurisdiction","score_opus":0.0371539470194358,"score_gpt":0.2867792209710797,"score_spread":0.2496252739516439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128187074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1670264,0.019495215,0.0037198574,0.23578247,0.0028743749,0.00035197177,0.0008976774,0.00009466725,0.56975734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8791212,0.004999586,0.0020347803,0.038617626,0.00050402444,0.00008240215,0.00033131783,0.000058398175,0.07425065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98214597,0.0013648592,0.00064584735,0.0017516323,0.008206488,0.005885301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719107,0.009533693,0.0014508165,0.00085848506,0.013478138,0.0027681913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016091304,0.00040701148,0.0006155047,0.0038351004,0.026330356,0.014547981,0.004484253,0.011323257,0.009211585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042992264,0.0005104231,0.0008370146,0.0029950722,0.011605558,0.004619325,0.003939744,0.01069451,0.0006242977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013829154,0.00007028032,0.013925432,0.0004710307,0.00006126907,0.0016155859,0.026374573,0.0005702973,0.0015099641,0.71461064,0.18228231,0.05837033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009997909,0.000062402156,0.044379648,0.0019381176,0.00044235008,0.0005216454,0.040113732,0.0016614997,0.0036011352,0.041930683,0.8648329,0.00041589676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9726218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.987507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09762555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09762555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17990547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7083263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128187123","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i2.381","title":"Class Arbitration in Canada: The Legal and Business Case","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Arbitration clause; Class action; Compulsory arbitration; Context (archaeology); Class (philosophy); Counterparty","score_opus":0.020661624698468228,"score_gpt":0.23688735763747992,"score_spread":0.2162257329390117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128187123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07457194,0.092604496,0.0031167474,0.11732324,0.0010279815,0.00026113458,0.00067515695,0.00006734486,0.7103519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83560646,0.04688716,0.0038613235,0.028194146,0.00036797966,0.00015394941,0.00027999116,0.00003838131,0.08461068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99037546,0.00086907635,0.00029733096,0.00059497193,0.0052054804,0.0026577192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926563,0.0025466324,0.00046604124,0.00019916355,0.0030826365,0.0010493145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005258851,0.00033819166,0.00053577084,0.00386986,0.018034996,0.0105208075,0.0026846973,0.007911134,0.0038800822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01564826,0.0004276545,0.00065182615,0.0063905246,0.007999376,0.002152875,0.0023909654,0.003958307,0.00034970886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037634527,0.000033148055,0.003056341,0.00022319793,0.00002416331,0.0016814695,0.0038493513,0.0011470431,0.00031069963,0.91276836,0.044540193,0.03232841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008598016,0.000038333194,0.019651253,0.00077578437,0.00013813691,0.0010196283,0.0070593143,0.0024278315,0.00062769203,0.06614684,0.9018262,0.00020306262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14710377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14710377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24427412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98923874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128189067","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v10i1-2.185","title":"The Evolution and Devolution of Aggregate Damages as a Common Issue","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Class action; Punitive damages; Devolution (biology); Aggregate (composite); Economic Justice; Eminent domain; Class (philosophy)","score_opus":0.03548926773429586,"score_gpt":0.28198495440637217,"score_spread":0.2464956866720763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128189067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018521475,0.2269522,0.015571199,0.1803532,0.0040109917,0.00045071723,0.00048028727,0.00014022864,0.55351955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61731184,0.16061482,0.022377592,0.08571964,0.0033287436,0.00037107363,0.00038519042,0.00023799748,0.10965303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93855256,0.009530915,0.0021531223,0.0049784095,0.03936166,0.0054233633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93529326,0.01707782,0.003529825,0.0035298856,0.037539773,0.0030293656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04438821,0.00059340236,0.0011147722,0.010539181,0.00947213,0.022969022,0.0065115793,0.008789758,0.0040920554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063562065,0.0008559015,0.0010093143,0.008954824,0.027723748,0.0073270467,0.00476663,0.013325016,0.00057806005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016128071,0.000016701159,0.0005065364,0.00040765165,0.000023662955,0.00011650136,0.001484799,0.0005547677,0.00026806086,0.91933525,0.029018031,0.048251912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002344564,0.000050717066,0.005711746,0.0015912019,0.00005968628,0.00014637994,0.001320155,0.0005906019,0.0005578183,0.045831364,0.9440201,0.000096726966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8635275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89965904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8635275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12748511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19948031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92497355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128189478","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v12i2.235","title":"Class Actions and the “Mixed Law” Regimes that Have Embraced them: A Comparative Reflection on Class Actions in the South African and Quebec Legal Systems","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Context (archaeology); Phenomenon; Common law; Reflection (computer programming); Comparative law","score_opus":0.18128770299761926,"score_gpt":0.3335130219239389,"score_spread":0.15222531892631963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128189478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48798707,0.021931313,0.0028785344,0.05986884,0.00033706828,0.00018423499,0.00022881034,0.00003061092,0.4265535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856619,0.0024818566,0.00048647157,0.0024805826,0.000031822994,0.000026631793,0.00002272624,0.0000112230955,0.008796652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99184895,0.0025743693,0.00021283804,0.0005277993,0.0020984986,0.0027375808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844488,0.008072886,0.0012099361,0.00046149222,0.0048935073,0.0009134793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009436962,0.00028048575,0.0004152184,0.004088856,0.028642803,0.015574243,0.002127042,0.0043685376,0.005381951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014105515,0.00030974555,0.00042417357,0.0053008613,0.02437896,0.0037617483,0.00362672,0.0042109666,0.00016935311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037028574,0.000044255314,0.011064394,0.00021798484,0.000034868724,0.0011409865,0.11950367,0.00057600107,0.0006315636,0.82484674,0.010497169,0.031405352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004019912,0.00006633621,0.09959491,0.0019267749,0.00011913583,0.00078276545,0.30512935,0.0015138047,0.0013728157,0.029279344,0.5599463,0.00022827782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96803916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9845909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106834315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.106834315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08583484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7751408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128190094","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v5i1.3","title":"Fall From Grace? Is Quebec Still Canada’s Class Action Paradise?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Government (linguistics); Class action","score_opus":0.053721807438056206,"score_gpt":0.2553016390867715,"score_spread":0.2015798316487153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128190094","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013757251,0.121485256,0.0006553027,0.70488214,0.011261904,0.00013152361,0.0046016998,0.00014466302,0.14308022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32359,0.10954216,0.0033867676,0.360787,0.0036950323,0.0002810389,0.0027189031,0.00029366548,0.19570541],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892308,0.0011340216,0.00046209255,0.0007257423,0.005387592,0.0030597423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96020544,0.00482013,0.0014798163,0.00093009544,0.027457122,0.005107414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012459518,0.0005706455,0.0010957854,0.0044936673,0.014463328,0.01726803,0.0037269406,0.008367193,0.020386912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029368794,0.00059653714,0.0011488677,0.007256193,0.0059826346,0.0047533205,0.0019506894,0.009038592,0.0014902608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098154014,0.000039740797,0.0033917273,0.00056625804,0.000079568395,0.0001431319,0.0014787812,0.00018743254,0.00015871445,0.073511496,0.86578846,0.05455652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003473969,0.000010453632,0.009952501,0.0008912868,0.000080801095,0.000032584754,0.0029567752,0.000084484665,0.00012933805,0.002061907,0.9837082,0.00005699469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15690792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15690792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4605921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9778673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128190475","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i1.155","title":"Our Aging <i>CPA</i> : It’s Time for Ontario to “Opt-In” to a Modern Global Class-Actions Framework","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; CLARITY; Legislature; Enforcement; Settlement (finance); European union; Class (philosophy); Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.07128358913533174,"score_gpt":0.33445849614376033,"score_spread":0.2631749070084286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128190475","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009647694,0.01735702,0.0022494297,0.7593018,0.0052522058,0.00018031684,0.00065397524,0.00012447944,0.2052331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32383093,0.020356053,0.009192696,0.22720097,0.0025550209,0.00021258819,0.0006844529,0.0002712052,0.41569617],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902739,0.0010364632,0.00032009563,0.0008576543,0.005232179,0.0022796157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800811,0.0031142822,0.00066389784,0.00065487914,0.011811946,0.0036739071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008658729,0.0003527413,0.00040294975,0.0016812162,0.01772923,0.016594663,0.0024715695,0.007969181,0.011538048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014159808,0.0004049848,0.00048215405,0.001878683,0.011999472,0.0037458136,0.0022111738,0.006795002,0.0013709038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023708955,0.000017851986,0.0019073063,0.00018455727,0.000010160024,0.00019993896,0.0033667737,0.0002068438,0.00038938422,0.28360218,0.6860056,0.02408564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005614127,0.00000768055,0.0023301458,0.0002338987,0.0000134076045,0.000041267853,0.0018188057,0.00018270452,0.00024926275,0.006142393,0.9889417,0.00003308523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9802372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9897893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1610886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1610886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27275115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9730183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128190759","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v4i2.328","title":"Shareholder Class Actions in Ontario: Putting John C. Coffee, Jr.’s Findings to the Test","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Class (philosophy); Shareholder; Class action; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.09443692777461131,"score_gpt":0.2707779425995156,"score_spread":0.17634101482490427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128190759","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04192321,0.15456231,0.0008332708,0.604438,0.0050201835,0.00031727916,0.0054306444,0.00008016517,0.18739492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57311153,0.16414751,0.003284361,0.13621573,0.0031376043,0.00036699473,0.0028320358,0.00015328119,0.116751015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820172,0.0016335468,0.0007998073,0.00072716543,0.011445665,0.0033766367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91074526,0.019404564,0.005321578,0.0023936485,0.05544654,0.006688333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0155999465,0.0004195637,0.00075834227,0.0041956403,0.012393668,0.008724352,0.002874982,0.005156357,0.005248522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047022827,0.0006104617,0.00069154025,0.008897021,0.0052567814,0.0030741156,0.0020084735,0.004313633,0.0005006004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017744246,0.00004020809,0.0173589,0.0018707563,0.0001254905,0.00026940854,0.008418038,0.00044035865,0.00041958533,0.076442674,0.82677305,0.06766406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008864304,0.000036646037,0.09594844,0.001759196,0.00022302697,0.000057490673,0.0077080694,0.0002136327,0.0005031539,0.004328778,0.88901615,0.0001166494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15460971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15460971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40005943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9805329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128190817","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v10i1-2.119","title":"Pre-Dispute Mandatory Arbitration Clauses — the Not-So-Secret Weapon of “Class” Destruction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Arbitration; Supreme court; Legislature; Consumer protection; Economic Justice; Class (philosophy); Arbitration clause; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.05800141014158415,"score_gpt":0.28208660878496344,"score_spread":0.22408519864337928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128190817","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075278147,0.59899646,0.00434444,0.06673882,0.0028585226,0.0001692126,0.0002745235,0.00006834812,0.31902176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36963928,0.47988284,0.007960853,0.040892743,0.0018266072,0.00015550753,0.00051690533,0.0001313819,0.09899386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9719668,0.003349667,0.00087931077,0.0015327338,0.019389851,0.0028817004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811075,0.006512876,0.0012480543,0.0007153534,0.009847303,0.00056900876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012311056,0.0005400494,0.0005633171,0.0044915606,0.007146469,0.007634059,0.0031543286,0.0036193582,0.0044245725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019183617,0.0004181325,0.0006373182,0.0043374104,0.012317104,0.0028430314,0.0016890004,0.0044346936,0.0006605041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026882877,0.00002375566,0.0005746579,0.0014837367,0.000027911256,0.00025986953,0.0034339568,0.0003110587,0.00092860806,0.744955,0.115996785,0.13197784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010118914,0.00001425543,0.0019835574,0.0012152534,0.000026898164,0.00009403678,0.00078023714,0.0000799303,0.0005933507,0.008863376,0.9863105,0.000028614111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8831244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9238139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8831244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06450747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1324211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46803665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128191121","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i1.157","title":"Speaking the Class Action, Thinking the Class Action: A Discussion of Changing Trends in Quebec’s Class Action Lexicon","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Lexicon; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.04750860282431501,"score_gpt":0.3010396428241762,"score_spread":0.2535310399998612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128191121","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014634068,0.31806374,0.0031632495,0.52118546,0.006262234,0.0001069102,0.0031731585,0.00014937302,0.13326178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47222295,0.2641404,0.009698292,0.13924745,0.0048621586,0.000393299,0.0030340084,0.0004923151,0.10590913],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99045485,0.0017520401,0.00052973547,0.0006811253,0.0051083528,0.001473764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598577,0.01295358,0.0014064572,0.00069499825,0.023702752,0.0013844342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01469652,0.0007124898,0.0011138964,0.01761046,0.020407706,0.019406889,0.0058893817,0.0054674414,0.011125438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028410409,0.00068279303,0.0008216031,0.029842747,0.012622018,0.0075487015,0.0020279603,0.0069893915,0.0007735272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004418596,0.000025404152,0.002754618,0.0010297031,0.00004847818,0.00021238883,0.015426156,0.0004655512,0.00033237843,0.31812134,0.58338386,0.07815601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015738227,0.000009372092,0.012219177,0.0011420404,0.0000507641,0.000079805504,0.0076919124,0.0003329437,0.00015582689,0.0063974657,0.97182286,0.00008211907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99638224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99797875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21994862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21994862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29261714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90474904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128191485","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i2.227","title":"Class Proceedings and the Future of Boilerplate in Consumer Contracts: Unconscionability as a Common Law Solution to Class Action Avoidance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Boilerplate text; Class action; Legislature; Consumer protection; Legislation; Common law; Framing (construction)","score_opus":0.020900594890051083,"score_gpt":0.2799083363679617,"score_spread":0.2590077414779106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128191485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04971,0.0025208048,0.10632905,0.17206855,0.0012089348,0.00021989754,0.00005463794,0.00014212933,0.66774595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9186462,0.0008432563,0.013347682,0.01865994,0.0009063287,0.00024831656,0.000031852243,0.000102136386,0.047214363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97861564,0.008528955,0.0007444314,0.0025020393,0.007189958,0.0024190089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96384335,0.022911318,0.002246203,0.004152344,0.00519707,0.0016497528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02844337,0.00045233354,0.0006906682,0.0016044916,0.011448623,0.017206091,0.0036254819,0.021727907,0.00954238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04416625,0.00063728506,0.001244199,0.001130493,0.04692564,0.0146294795,0.008935256,0.022320712,0.00097377383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035606033,0.000007062532,0.000072525734,0.0000041645503,0.0000013350965,0.000030083953,0.00041761715,0.0001207241,0.000032702632,0.9969258,0.0011068735,0.0012777451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002885613,0.00002588199,0.00024109567,0.00017898486,0.000018180774,0.00006867413,0.000800763,0.002717874,0.0004325463,0.93737435,0.05806502,0.000047652775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02924064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026027836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02924064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016223643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02115977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15042472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128194070","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v12i2.261","title":"Class Action Case Study: From Certification to Trial in <i>Jer V Samji</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Adjudication; Class (philosophy); Settlement (finance); Action (physics); Certification","score_opus":0.16633741762298207,"score_gpt":0.3629355441518282,"score_spread":0.19659812652884615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128194070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37367827,0.019659342,0.0067589427,0.051854253,0.0014415991,0.0019494746,0.000937485,0.0001812477,0.5435394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9343075,0.0060798656,0.003240737,0.010559823,0.00018442371,0.0003281919,0.00042838985,0.0000440621,0.044827066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98417354,0.0035340441,0.00066239416,0.00097438,0.0067278785,0.00392774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972639,0.013491943,0.0016793332,0.00075682113,0.008826252,0.0026065072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012669171,0.0004135977,0.00041194292,0.0032224627,0.02205166,0.006655016,0.0034011395,0.0072161937,0.005290588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028851794,0.00039822483,0.00052151625,0.0042416616,0.0049212985,0.0017123406,0.0028808617,0.0065064295,0.0006044221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044688734,0.0018270336,0.042913597,0.0018466206,0.00012580896,0.03344383,0.10875459,0.0035805563,0.0025801067,0.26337516,0.29555613,0.24554965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020475077,0.00046650195,0.056879353,0.0017047204,0.00021665008,0.005627925,0.07671897,0.0018262303,0.0033407088,0.008279585,0.8444651,0.00026950656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85288554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94166064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14711446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046924893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09105545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3404655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128195410","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v10i1-2.3","title":"Guest Editor’s Introduction: The Past, Present, and Future of Class Actions in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Control (management); World class","score_opus":0.03436668423072999,"score_gpt":0.2529450624543814,"score_spread":0.21857837822365142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128195410","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029409217,0.037367925,0.00012226852,0.43326882,0.5249455,0.000029955074,0.0004817427,0.00003620557,0.0034535278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011395769,0.069120884,0.00045792313,0.3884639,0.50086755,0.00008119506,0.000452736,0.00010507873,0.029054957],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913967,0.00057427416,0.0008657036,0.00073473516,0.0051805926,0.001248018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9262151,0.01085134,0.0030676925,0.00077505707,0.0527972,0.006293629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076950532,0.0011892568,0.0018240606,0.0049735196,0.006064747,0.009130463,0.0039334767,0.01170681,0.010700485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043919183,0.0006177256,0.0013278737,0.005062887,0.0037785713,0.003089482,0.0016185374,0.013615251,0.0018529464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008509523,0.0000029530177,0.000111230234,0.000105515646,0.000004408131,0.000025558884,0.00003369631,0.000012935848,0.000011170833,0.00044247328,0.996938,0.0023034245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020585478,0.0000087635335,0.002083935,0.00097386754,0.000038636997,0.000081829705,0.00039304415,0.00007865795,0.000050085553,0.00043384207,0.9957931,0.000043633394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64893323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8593105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35106677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029710837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09127991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70626855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128195635","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i2.191","title":"Judicial Scrutiny of Third Party Litigation Funding Agreements in Canadian Class Actions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Commodification; Third party; Subordination (linguistics); Class (philosophy); Demise; Culpability","score_opus":0.08359834846464893,"score_gpt":0.3160594635228563,"score_spread":0.23246111505820738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128195635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42556676,0.055246025,0.002787615,0.10042095,0.0017112474,0.00052066357,0.0010250827,0.00011142677,0.4126102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97471434,0.0058632432,0.0008319341,0.0063547045,0.0002252473,0.00004448824,0.00011208999,0.000014840413,0.011839063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9586572,0.0040489677,0.0014800249,0.0022137107,0.025363274,0.008236838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8867811,0.041311752,0.009303698,0.0018673276,0.05600052,0.0047357087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031215675,0.00028050767,0.0005495831,0.010349953,0.01875577,0.01344073,0.00386678,0.006299366,0.0035827293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07972658,0.00044849893,0.00057314907,0.009924708,0.009150454,0.0016044147,0.0029008607,0.0046108216,0.00021841338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036731383,0.00020347489,0.118814945,0.0020015303,0.00022575646,0.0028123003,0.07330504,0.0032194513,0.0042193076,0.43704858,0.14497925,0.21280305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001143507,0.00015494743,0.30130374,0.0025429402,0.00047254295,0.00048206223,0.0320031,0.002805908,0.0057963883,0.015048041,0.638881,0.00039501232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97785723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9880696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14181748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14181748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18948965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128195647","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i1.73","title":"From Edmonds to Campbell: A Principled Basis for Pre-Certification Costs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Class action; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.06430372801353139,"score_gpt":0.31973176599779374,"score_spread":0.25542803798426233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128195647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014049536,0.011586182,0.04804525,0.16411042,0.0024635878,0.00038580867,0.00040660426,0.0001871501,0.7587655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6916573,0.00502726,0.0437019,0.0730798,0.00093870464,0.00039447285,0.0001591612,0.00017679896,0.18486461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804448,0.0037101505,0.00074396946,0.0023942562,0.010043875,0.0026629867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98914206,0.0045315595,0.0004770256,0.0007590146,0.0043389816,0.0007512819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014574242,0.00055980374,0.0006963335,0.0031266164,0.013214487,0.016380645,0.0041298848,0.012023732,0.0050325617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026701882,0.00075705413,0.00086445827,0.002042235,0.028021147,0.0058608805,0.0038812878,0.012301151,0.0007311309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003846222,0.000002950531,0.0001064943,0.000018206643,0.0000016449625,0.000034368997,0.0008642669,0.00009080362,0.000036774887,0.98566794,0.00991186,0.0032608258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036278692,0.000027205302,0.0013635036,0.00066428,0.00004006245,0.00012700752,0.002217338,0.00093703874,0.0005433039,0.53530514,0.45863968,0.000099256285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74042416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8197198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74042416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059404045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10422428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52220905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128195747","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i2.327","title":"À la Frontière de L’inconnu : Une Analyse des Recours Collectifs Multi-Ressorts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Legislation; Class (philosophy); Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Action (physics); Proposition","score_opus":0.09046652595244307,"score_gpt":0.288166318305136,"score_spread":0.19769979235269292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128195747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40373412,0.027559271,0.00758476,0.013630778,0.00019211168,0.00016679113,0.0005718025,0.000052017796,0.5465084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92290574,0.006892828,0.0030429338,0.00070202915,0.00010903666,0.00005514054,0.00019906017,0.000055230536,0.06603797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98948133,0.0021423064,0.00018550295,0.0006783844,0.005168964,0.0023435473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99261284,0.0031133424,0.0010207522,0.00033364136,0.0023902946,0.0005292584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005979233,0.0004569926,0.0007051149,0.007069795,0.014601421,0.013810119,0.0020522976,0.0016810073,0.009987336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011178053,0.00036551073,0.000759865,0.012259259,0.010219062,0.0035047373,0.00369508,0.0025013934,0.00064135005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007561318,0.000040557938,0.017056994,0.00031585924,0.00004994658,0.0017323347,0.08318825,0.001224345,0.00040677813,0.7901677,0.012117566,0.093623966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028396396,0.00006592268,0.11584736,0.0010618399,0.000084783984,0.0013367332,0.16391316,0.0020801297,0.0006604281,0.038790297,0.67603177,0.000099166675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8907077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9419625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10929233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05211931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048716906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37815386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128196997","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i1.121","title":"“The Sport of Kings”: Financing Class Actions in Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Settlement (finance); Class action; Statutory law; Class (philosophy); Certification","score_opus":0.059440071946710034,"score_gpt":0.27002095233322393,"score_spread":0.2105808803865139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128196997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06855159,0.12834905,0.0016555958,0.13194174,0.0019156581,0.00044902842,0.000999479,0.00006784275,0.6660701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6362394,0.10272696,0.0025479782,0.027702231,0.00060774473,0.00017684678,0.00048237725,0.00006742758,0.22944897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906441,0.0008392758,0.00038823095,0.00048999826,0.0056133945,0.0020250585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916859,0.0020100616,0.00080677896,0.0003596731,0.0040267017,0.001110853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050638355,0.00030697064,0.00031120869,0.0022461913,0.01354727,0.0068438426,0.0024019228,0.0052028485,0.005273604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011810031,0.00043364495,0.00048891414,0.004116553,0.007455952,0.0020538413,0.0019326758,0.0028367862,0.00036788615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007127606,0.000059198228,0.006736798,0.0016972453,0.000035257905,0.00159272,0.018923191,0.00081145903,0.0010862804,0.6318156,0.21235578,0.12481517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016582657,0.000029463215,0.0148546435,0.00065019925,0.00003103214,0.00016585828,0.003764186,0.00015468392,0.0003289078,0.0040368363,0.97592473,0.000042896412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98722947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14145729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14145729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29080358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99578786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128198943","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i2.355","title":"Fee Agreements and fee Approval in Ontario Class Proceedings","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class (philosophy); Class action; American rule; Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.03022811317696147,"score_gpt":0.24130449037040305,"score_spread":0.21107637719344158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128198943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09768022,0.02430456,0.0048402105,0.04105714,0.0006631323,0.0003429601,0.00045394377,0.00007674458,0.83058125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8771465,0.009182046,0.0031784198,0.0045694443,0.00038431727,0.00012081081,0.00015381072,0.000057469984,0.10520714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95879763,0.0069070132,0.0023038003,0.0017264091,0.02520966,0.005055385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95671344,0.020811846,0.005415807,0.0014374264,0.01388959,0.0017318438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019491674,0.00022665468,0.00042892463,0.0057146843,0.0111788325,0.01321927,0.0025316796,0.00417025,0.010397038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061858702,0.0006373901,0.0004813002,0.0055515096,0.009489454,0.0040704934,0.003177967,0.0034487909,0.00065491843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041512256,0.000044337943,0.0064049936,0.00028001313,0.000019279287,0.00046143046,0.008577036,0.0010372524,0.0003927579,0.8765797,0.03623005,0.069931604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054532367,0.000101933714,0.06679364,0.0009799107,0.00007867735,0.0003423303,0.009560503,0.0019392559,0.0012032528,0.058009893,0.8607002,0.00023586092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8779166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9359198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122083426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09564553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09015983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6939602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128201105","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v9i2.419","title":"Putting A Price on Legal Services: Determining Reasonable Class Counsel Fees in the Settlement Context","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Res judicata; Settlement (finance); Class (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Substantive law; New class","score_opus":0.026246108506656467,"score_gpt":0.2562751822815091,"score_spread":0.23002907377485263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128201105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2691826,0.008954454,0.12133248,0.04393717,0.0006951952,0.0011733709,0.000832491,0.00019585772,0.55369645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97132283,0.0010541059,0.018313468,0.0015021459,0.00014236457,0.00009771248,0.00006909426,0.00003531646,0.0074630524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96169865,0.014830302,0.0016776326,0.0019157814,0.01487414,0.00500354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95384663,0.02394103,0.003570999,0.001788348,0.015356976,0.0014960507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029426044,0.0008078773,0.0014164838,0.011592296,0.00734462,0.019368593,0.0036191915,0.006749457,0.005930524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.101783454,0.0006696255,0.0008140005,0.0052653532,0.012332749,0.0082878,0.0044897506,0.0056904377,0.00059686415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048123642,0.00004089634,0.010196091,0.00010882231,0.00004488758,0.00057770626,0.002146007,0.0123754805,0.00027562297,0.92277956,0.007914296,0.043492377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013276313,0.00020693579,0.06388749,0.0026316515,0.00030242724,0.00070758676,0.016300691,0.070169725,0.0022184493,0.6985713,0.14435168,0.0005193363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5622736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7408543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43772638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059002757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058939558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88060844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128201199","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i1.3","title":"Le Recours Collectif et la <i>Loi sur la Protection du Consommateur</i> : Complicité, Utilité, Complémentarité","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Consumer protection; Class action; Alliance; Class (philosophy); Supreme court","score_opus":0.0436673516578199,"score_gpt":0.2648705012976714,"score_spread":0.22120314963985152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128201199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2565998,0.009592725,0.009491782,0.0389907,0.00079157937,0.00020865534,0.0009233022,0.00021921284,0.68318224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72477216,0.002024233,0.0028452892,0.003494826,0.00027761553,0.00018870088,0.00023216869,0.00010536082,0.26605964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99073505,0.0024957657,0.00016994058,0.0007201483,0.0043098954,0.0015692709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941227,0.0026474802,0.00062688865,0.00063463516,0.0015689242,0.00039932947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005692254,0.00067944743,0.0005035657,0.0011233253,0.008998074,0.010345587,0.0015213607,0.0033058848,0.021040674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008197143,0.000356102,0.0006504268,0.0016189488,0.009313699,0.0028154547,0.0024586094,0.004900804,0.0019373188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029621169,0.00017864097,0.009195479,0.00023559976,0.0000626307,0.0005017031,0.020451779,0.0006400471,0.0039749914,0.8389905,0.032209963,0.09326248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013437081,0.00023670982,0.05475584,0.00047488767,0.00008886452,0.0002973217,0.009621178,0.0011398538,0.0063424367,0.030185958,0.89651245,0.00020996002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77687126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79071766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22312874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032031633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03858554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44888556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128203871","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v12i2.125","title":"Is Class Action a Preferable Remedy for Independent Contractors? A Case Study on the Proposed Canadian Hockey League Class Action","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; League; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Certification; Face (sociological concept); Res judicata","score_opus":0.17674665294968334,"score_gpt":0.3498826448859137,"score_spread":0.17313599193623036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128203871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21471573,0.108542524,0.005012311,0.14202435,0.0022528612,0.0006785137,0.0004467999,0.000062343715,0.52626455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9153518,0.030243792,0.0025975632,0.017262679,0.00026415897,0.00013226824,0.00014380466,0.000022599937,0.033981387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97922426,0.005258913,0.00063504424,0.001404051,0.009163332,0.0043144436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98307866,0.008443894,0.0011784106,0.00052432524,0.005674479,0.0011003297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020257462,0.0004093358,0.00047403527,0.0028435315,0.022330096,0.009808173,0.0040162993,0.008451783,0.0045234216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020220276,0.00031508587,0.00061045325,0.0039223707,0.011997913,0.0021214564,0.0024315328,0.0054601864,0.00034710913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009396329,0.00020535532,0.016226918,0.0021460643,0.00008467814,0.006482778,0.052739337,0.0017148509,0.0010097874,0.66342676,0.12169193,0.13417754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007817331,0.000104335755,0.023474896,0.0042174538,0.00023125282,0.0015817964,0.07214026,0.00097026286,0.0012601322,0.008868328,0.88692385,0.00014931231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95180047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9833347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0895313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0895313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1573635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6495981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128204067","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v9i1_179","title":"The Pre-Authorization Disclosure of Legal Grounds: Why Recognition of the Right to Legal Particulars is Appropriate and Needed in the Quebec Class Action Context","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Petitioner; Class (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Scope (computer science); Liability; Class action; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.026422283169025763,"score_gpt":0.2493693327323341,"score_spread":0.22294704956330835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128204067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10374508,0.056143135,0.0052765585,0.39275438,0.001690965,0.0002458714,0.00052781793,0.00010277429,0.43951353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91324633,0.009693257,0.0020252152,0.029073358,0.00037257312,0.000057807378,0.000087308756,0.000058757418,0.04538529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97996324,0.005853209,0.0007132351,0.0016479148,0.0064986525,0.0053237616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95090586,0.018262569,0.002226976,0.0015296589,0.024611061,0.0024638837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023233363,0.0003113505,0.0005603135,0.0028765285,0.018860918,0.020104669,0.0031401585,0.009122521,0.006862611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04978008,0.00049208454,0.00047648113,0.0036383888,0.018644093,0.005748194,0.002630299,0.0077432836,0.00055458955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006607037,0.000043339718,0.007309214,0.00035475192,0.000027168366,0.0011298971,0.01739801,0.0005100641,0.000730109,0.79133004,0.117546916,0.06355445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006794958,0.000050946226,0.040054776,0.0020792878,0.00010168292,0.00048526455,0.029358156,0.0010782977,0.001109182,0.04316888,0.8821991,0.0002464387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98061347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13317515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13317515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1703862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96625787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128204741","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i1.33","title":"Class Reunion: Revisiting Class Action Justification After Twenty Years","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Action (physics); New class; Class analysis; Privilege (computing)","score_opus":0.08277399389543627,"score_gpt":0.27810242312333466,"score_spread":0.1953284292278984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128204741","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02078543,0.11997409,0.010018568,0.6542136,0.040681306,0.00054223614,0.0010191633,0.00023346975,0.1525321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42542085,0.05569486,0.014006944,0.4032031,0.012106727,0.0005365274,0.0008030937,0.00037103365,0.0878569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88389426,0.021037223,0.0073416526,0.007830674,0.07048914,0.009407111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65593356,0.13768335,0.0101217255,0.012255394,0.17971644,0.0042894967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10403974,0.0006386726,0.0012427965,0.009945016,0.015764158,0.015162366,0.008861077,0.011621876,0.0034903598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21102928,0.0007483377,0.0011795308,0.008918125,0.024388619,0.007240985,0.00507396,0.016380092,0.00069455564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000413821,0.000023779294,0.0023150868,0.0008785406,0.000060853916,0.0003277108,0.015383735,0.00017961557,0.00035244998,0.50935245,0.39543948,0.07564497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020559557,0.000015661408,0.004386154,0.002195676,0.000073395466,0.00007115931,0.007163041,0.00028999473,0.0006687799,0.012925595,0.9721004,0.00008956431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8860215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9047394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113978505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.110438034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21077402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8012878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128204937","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i1.071","title":"L’autorisation de L’action Collective : Raisons D’être, Application et Changements À Venir","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legislator; Authorization; Rationalism","score_opus":0.072776719648165,"score_gpt":0.322592384926124,"score_spread":0.249815665277959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128204937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11738867,0.007492715,0.023551213,0.10069976,0.002071576,0.00031857067,0.000079051795,0.00013803651,0.7482605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86004806,0.001124599,0.0042108227,0.007645122,0.00026950712,0.00011783161,0.000023658042,0.000043434815,0.12651686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768038,0.008821462,0.0007988311,0.002279472,0.008208795,0.0030876629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820885,0.007990427,0.0012025198,0.0015124172,0.0058648484,0.0013414093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017121037,0.00039689345,0.00040066015,0.0012175743,0.018618569,0.011609563,0.0019631474,0.0065709413,0.009663241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015882136,0.0003405212,0.00061043986,0.0009282969,0.029456308,0.0029552225,0.0046072123,0.008199783,0.0008817217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034812703,0.000046577796,0.0024550557,0.00013739835,0.000020059051,0.0005861566,0.026444526,0.00050363445,0.0010301728,0.9188668,0.018242642,0.03163219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057629994,0.00017137034,0.016482277,0.0010918125,0.00006771526,0.0007689879,0.042143192,0.0017936016,0.004359938,0.10745774,0.8253685,0.00023729895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47462583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61595434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5253742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034047253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048842933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9437264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128205584","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v9i1_75","title":"“An Unassailable Right to Speak”: Class Communications, Opt-Out Rights, and the Class Proceedings Act","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Class (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Jurisprudence; Opposition (politics); Economic Justice; Class action; Civil procedure","score_opus":0.029671644467252095,"score_gpt":0.27190659672714557,"score_spread":0.24223495225989347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128205584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053865016,0.0044675237,0.005265832,0.25308937,0.0007133369,0.000117206,0.0002895901,0.0000697765,0.68212235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81783277,0.001380629,0.001880877,0.07214752,0.000929065,0.00023220977,0.00011626517,0.00005561449,0.10542506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98355204,0.003697637,0.0005867405,0.0016201151,0.005570686,0.00497278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98809195,0.007239307,0.0009117832,0.00085398887,0.001778588,0.0011243557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00887979,0.0004738672,0.00039716958,0.0008582016,0.016268536,0.012938594,0.0029620416,0.020999385,0.0062175496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017192816,0.0006722228,0.0006529108,0.0008093667,0.043381665,0.0061975583,0.0041973144,0.01416468,0.00095229293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014914559,0.000014102814,0.000586965,0.00001745219,0.0000031830425,0.0002348381,0.005253566,0.00006204179,0.00013817076,0.97019124,0.020433791,0.0030498544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013524231,0.00009609993,0.01039896,0.0006226213,0.000075064505,0.0005466546,0.012311701,0.0011977276,0.001399002,0.3815042,0.5914598,0.00025298842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.575778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67298055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.424222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02473811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040209934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85344064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128209445","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i2.255","title":"“Cost-Shifting” and Access to Justice: A Quantitative Review of Certification Motion Cost Awards in Ontario","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Certification; Context (archaeology); Commission; Class (philosophy); Class action","score_opus":0.19675123671813405,"score_gpt":0.38315626247236273,"score_spread":0.18640502575422868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128209445","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29422683,0.4990808,0.0036841796,0.025848396,0.0010651336,0.002690357,0.027789408,0.00007503773,0.14553982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8194809,0.15724872,0.003757813,0.0029501042,0.000327012,0.0009178489,0.00494747,0.00005930185,0.010310863],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9465696,0.008039983,0.0051826783,0.0016333424,0.036553632,0.002020872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6878554,0.0856578,0.044789214,0.0044586817,0.17382717,0.003411752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036121212,0.00033960905,0.0012168625,0.032008935,0.004218339,0.0067576556,0.0021223298,0.00090782216,0.002899166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11305387,0.0006357678,0.0008631476,0.06454549,0.003484661,0.0016132254,0.0021268295,0.00096907595,0.0001966173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005271584,0.00017793979,0.29637253,0.08111133,0.0021190075,0.0008150987,0.04958902,0.0020338628,0.0023212782,0.044735983,0.11367211,0.40652463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004115347,0.00014127558,0.583289,0.021017589,0.0013723196,0.00015526805,0.0131315,0.00059787487,0.0007029969,0.00097582646,0.37842456,0.00015061312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93738526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98035496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111868806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.111868806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20676461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8116688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128209449","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v5i2.294","title":"Three’s a Crowd: Third-Party Litigation Funding of Class Actions in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Legislation","score_opus":0.06011244629898201,"score_gpt":0.2758319854926089,"score_spread":0.21571953919362688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128209449","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121949665,0.17086782,0.0022452474,0.34904158,0.008019723,0.0010502114,0.0063341106,0.00035041466,0.34014124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73597044,0.08443714,0.002444648,0.07497435,0.0019172988,0.0005075019,0.0022641642,0.0002339616,0.09725056],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9646257,0.0025501964,0.0012858534,0.0013493007,0.022263784,0.007925128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91220677,0.020646092,0.0033145265,0.0016587187,0.052646726,0.009527165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022246039,0.00067874265,0.0015177787,0.01209994,0.022442885,0.017439576,0.0056665675,0.008887087,0.006737716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06421822,0.00094780774,0.0012061243,0.014343238,0.0054158596,0.0031977026,0.0033364962,0.007931215,0.00047156776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003739398,0.00015463209,0.012955024,0.0017837168,0.0002407865,0.0005065636,0.007956602,0.0019479041,0.00051385694,0.16319185,0.6777304,0.13264465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023711252,0.0000973701,0.0760753,0.002545245,0.000585795,0.00013876536,0.0102714775,0.001508207,0.000867856,0.0068972795,0.90048176,0.00029371557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99618185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99803716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20372392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20372392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5397923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9235674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128209984","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i2.239","title":"Mass Actions: How Litigation Investment Makes Class Actions Unnecessary","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Action (physics); Investment (military); Class (philosophy); Mass tort","score_opus":0.14048935723711184,"score_gpt":0.27971500276922506,"score_spread":0.13922564553211322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128209984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026773814,0.015572766,0.043846723,0.094719306,0.001215759,0.00026232784,0.00015098149,0.00022601416,0.8172323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82703626,0.010999326,0.0165506,0.041083276,0.0012285481,0.00036987537,0.00010495844,0.00023220517,0.10239498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96518165,0.0091844555,0.0009882496,0.0033715304,0.015753519,0.005520657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9590091,0.024966126,0.0027750756,0.003565739,0.00853105,0.001153004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028672164,0.00060442503,0.0007967401,0.0031106048,0.010491091,0.01404967,0.0036064854,0.00805443,0.014601544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047093555,0.00065609417,0.0009777583,0.0017749167,0.021559909,0.009171287,0.005251615,0.008503468,0.0016419666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009742375,0.000011179727,0.0003306846,0.000062393934,0.000010152683,0.00008296069,0.0010252894,0.00017034219,0.000098287965,0.9704826,0.011428727,0.016287588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009064538,0.00007161304,0.0027092544,0.0008668609,0.00013271594,0.00026327246,0.00259426,0.0013727286,0.0010797249,0.43638837,0.5543505,0.00008001494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2145316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.247233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7854684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024902401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03417447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42656577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128211567","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i1.015","title":"Case Review of Decertification Motions in Class Proceedings","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Test (biology); Calculus (dental); New class; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.06788700706739034,"score_gpt":0.29958724747809895,"score_spread":0.2317002404107086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128211567","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01951958,0.8201885,0.0036492576,0.024667127,0.0033251755,0.0009377522,0.0017735204,0.00010505285,0.12583406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28672335,0.6645278,0.0048020384,0.023650711,0.0013085075,0.0005064756,0.001875579,0.00008980963,0.016515741],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.976775,0.0042912383,0.0032761334,0.0014615122,0.012595569,0.0016005026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9253437,0.034893956,0.008163929,0.0028088244,0.027749859,0.0010397945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021798268,0.0004930344,0.0008559908,0.0100258915,0.004196846,0.0031695806,0.0034257665,0.0051162676,0.0047910935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08068758,0.00055224757,0.0011328863,0.010144015,0.0036324456,0.0014077378,0.0015867392,0.0035203074,0.0010760418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028647474,0.00015583295,0.0108125005,0.024261601,0.0004919692,0.014780328,0.0050748093,0.0008171162,0.0014528283,0.05881663,0.36231875,0.5207311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035509267,0.00007417456,0.009379173,0.022180066,0.00053943717,0.0074546267,0.0014357115,0.00016361185,0.0017482267,0.0014065319,0.9554918,0.00009114704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34683654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47604913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65316343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021649979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044545714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68963546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128212273","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v10i1-2.7","title":"Beyond the Courtroom: Access to Justice, Privatization, and the Future of Class Action Research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Expansive; Economic Justice; Scholarship; Politics; Class (philosophy); Class action; Public policy","score_opus":0.13576560226060283,"score_gpt":0.3786543577581115,"score_spread":0.24288875549750868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128212273","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029821841,0.5463898,0.0052196924,0.1799204,0.0020343643,0.000072817886,0.000087762965,0.00004273698,0.23641065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7572743,0.20787863,0.001932959,0.015849609,0.001320165,0.00008748084,0.000062482184,0.00003167965,0.01556276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809971,0.008972355,0.00058490806,0.0013114244,0.005367088,0.0027671056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9720043,0.02004252,0.0017910751,0.0016833852,0.0032266777,0.0012521094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01774371,0.00040090884,0.00093838415,0.004482197,0.010623017,0.015452712,0.0025514318,0.0047168084,0.005837301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028197208,0.00023149012,0.00051627547,0.006641739,0.044109054,0.010239581,0.004663157,0.0051805037,0.00028530296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015852427,0.000027751337,0.00068500516,0.0006469357,0.000014219351,0.000057578764,0.011131851,0.0002898719,0.00008156322,0.8818164,0.0058532036,0.09937978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029693396,0.00006901486,0.012267661,0.008798257,0.00006996837,0.00011927723,0.034190305,0.0005008721,0.00043438858,0.27712741,0.6663199,0.00007333209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53303885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56561655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46696115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046421878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09191821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93942237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128213404","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v4i2.220","title":"Seeking Recognition of Canadian Class Action Judgments in Foreign Jurisdictions: Perils and Pitfalls","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Class action; Foreign policy; Control (management); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.09427068207777062,"score_gpt":0.26925571247865815,"score_spread":0.17498503040088753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128213404","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052803043,0.076811336,0.0036279445,0.6460533,0.0080186445,0.0009120425,0.0017755944,0.00029729542,0.20970085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6809304,0.03352641,0.012623164,0.2002605,0.0034090374,0.0008842387,0.0014707457,0.0003086183,0.06658691],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8796416,0.0217125,0.0073465966,0.006158484,0.06531073,0.01983004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5295426,0.12164364,0.009880234,0.008227317,0.31726122,0.013444871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14468339,0.0008319487,0.001977251,0.01933752,0.03184584,0.024173915,0.010063279,0.012201309,0.0047429665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27108943,0.0012395326,0.0013744242,0.018034536,0.011212305,0.006677266,0.005474763,0.012446177,0.00073327444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017089031,0.00009012692,0.014285325,0.002253459,0.00018422505,0.00034892323,0.020817801,0.00051652885,0.000752469,0.14494553,0.6369576,0.17867716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014172672,0.0000659049,0.05643619,0.004108411,0.00034342136,0.00018232258,0.024345007,0.0010556154,0.001585156,0.012309463,0.8990033,0.00042345852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97878075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99262446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16386108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16386108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41193992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9698026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128214096","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i2.659","title":"Canadian Class Action Review—Cumulative Index","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.04032764317773567,"score_gpt":0.2846501868435062,"score_spread":0.2443225436657705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128214096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012417631,0.31748262,0.0008015949,0.06016046,0.0643256,0.002143946,0.09038748,0.001433469,0.4620231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022794718,0.3451772,0.002059096,0.01569009,0.023515658,0.0022926463,0.06819837,0.0004430906,0.5198291],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871748,0.0004165898,0.00065107126,0.00049985276,0.009919802,0.0013378501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9335076,0.0018537192,0.00216687,0.0010873141,0.05684926,0.004535155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00530516,0.0021258541,0.0030666033,0.045803785,0.004717856,0.008103832,0.0041523045,0.0048500495,0.088826776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026627747,0.0009602458,0.0012941147,0.050244547,0.0017844584,0.0022535855,0.002030074,0.0029066592,0.03899521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001246999,0.0000068937447,0.00010876948,0.0004409483,0.0000062554022,0.000004769136,0.000004837928,0.000029428418,0.000012285807,0.00031359823,0.985859,0.013200674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001770204,0.0000063049674,0.003254233,0.0006623025,0.000022957194,0.0000093295275,0.000017472124,0.00004408586,0.000018958253,0.00021466287,0.99571854,0.000013458795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8153098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89278793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18469018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04282731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14933828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3715557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128214363","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i2.195","title":"After the Windfall: Representation of Class Members in Individual Issues Adjudication","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Settlement (finance); Class (philosophy); Representation (politics); Class action; Incentive","score_opus":0.09364897409981149,"score_gpt":0.30696438437873436,"score_spread":0.21331541027892287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128214363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09498216,0.031134328,0.064663656,0.3912513,0.007013272,0.002024163,0.0003528148,0.00033527598,0.40824306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7412397,0.008968084,0.029346678,0.089155234,0.0020801402,0.00069221214,0.0002483731,0.00016492126,0.12810464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90367126,0.030993877,0.0042478237,0.0059931255,0.040128272,0.014965629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9301262,0.029669715,0.0035351377,0.0060281307,0.027767733,0.0028730612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08100825,0.0004074968,0.0007351713,0.0033969886,0.016981281,0.012465516,0.004977322,0.008301155,0.004774776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11337052,0.0005994787,0.0007745395,0.0033036405,0.01131727,0.0065861926,0.005731842,0.011205123,0.0013834626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013149073,0.00008184245,0.006475297,0.00048541042,0.000051644773,0.0011827227,0.02660672,0.00054175337,0.0018559867,0.5036397,0.14289483,0.31605262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012700158,0.00018679725,0.016922098,0.0020185392,0.000114923205,0.00071355025,0.015590395,0.0013303593,0.0027331584,0.056573685,0.9035468,0.00014267235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.398432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56163645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.601568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021627262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07442924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7922257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128214659","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v12i2.157","title":"Deterring Compensation: Class Action Litigation and Damage Awards Against Corporate Defendants","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Fiduciary; Plaintiff; Deterrence theory; Duty; Deterrence (psychology); Action (physics); Damages","score_opus":0.1283942777516027,"score_gpt":0.3057690406135191,"score_spread":0.17737476286191642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128214659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46475774,0.0040506995,0.017895512,0.039048623,0.00079403335,0.00035757935,0.00011810065,0.00011583914,0.4728618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98800176,0.00034001752,0.0007356629,0.0018775789,0.0001664302,0.00004083747,0.000012489932,0.000004834034,0.008820423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97728115,0.006365059,0.001292276,0.0018741958,0.009164789,0.0040225857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9500003,0.03256468,0.007853648,0.0017429646,0.0056602154,0.0021781928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018306242,0.00048442313,0.0005646023,0.0036512217,0.007364061,0.010635042,0.0021198774,0.014002613,0.008722171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060644742,0.0004141246,0.0006311863,0.0016787946,0.009430769,0.0043262243,0.0051174737,0.0077883513,0.00060075533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019356064,0.0004847166,0.041418575,0.0001685896,0.00011217056,0.0020046828,0.004013474,0.0028954255,0.0012681246,0.88494897,0.012510464,0.04998121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005656007,0.00177387,0.16086206,0.0015542349,0.00085596077,0.005287776,0.012368614,0.043111406,0.012911295,0.57652223,0.18344009,0.00074682717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03675113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06738246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96324885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014347357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012162589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10409784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128217306","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v10i1-2.203","title":"Institutional Abuse Class Actions Post- <i>Cloud</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Class (philosophy); Class action; Economic Justice; Certification","score_opus":0.08496053618825773,"score_gpt":0.28724768087558383,"score_spread":0.20228714468732611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128217306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039276376,0.07592906,0.0037290805,0.22485894,0.0056727417,0.0007151707,0.0015871234,0.00017262476,0.6480589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5908456,0.058260813,0.004039027,0.14184469,0.0022237168,0.00048017784,0.0014696709,0.00019358505,0.20064278],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9620388,0.0038460288,0.002016434,0.002330954,0.021936744,0.007830932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9420549,0.017359167,0.004579168,0.0029544544,0.029632835,0.0034194863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024609046,0.00046537316,0.00062016636,0.004061071,0.020213587,0.009193907,0.0046391366,0.008389659,0.00695075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047523603,0.0005581912,0.001020147,0.0043928786,0.012283384,0.0033142099,0.0035244199,0.008648817,0.0010140748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003912748,0.00005203906,0.0057739574,0.0007905393,0.000055197273,0.0007960318,0.015752586,0.00023405979,0.00063109054,0.36619383,0.50472355,0.104958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014044563,0.000016743448,0.0085795205,0.0011820591,0.000063050305,0.00016672073,0.0049859183,0.00010357525,0.0005898144,0.0046644886,0.9795869,0.000047222762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9107559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9449569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10521132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10521132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17860019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7633651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128219693","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i2.527","title":"The Future of Securities Class Actions in Canada: A Comment on the Article of Philip Anisman and Garry Watson","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Watson; Class (philosophy); Class action","score_opus":0.02201113826381872,"score_gpt":0.22544858841733614,"score_spread":0.2034374501535174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128219693","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013830056,0.020447716,0.00014068326,0.9565291,0.006746553,0.000034831548,0.0006134516,0.00003865279,0.0140659455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026157659,0.01730559,0.00046286703,0.91923904,0.007304982,0.00007292251,0.00029782802,0.0001038162,0.029055346],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9686539,0.0018366056,0.0015243924,0.002198972,0.018102903,0.007683258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91164273,0.027547095,0.0047007604,0.0012503369,0.045363177,0.009495887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017435385,0.0012111594,0.0025942088,0.005263708,0.027763003,0.022676982,0.009623726,0.06470798,0.009744163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061374243,0.0019256484,0.0026223124,0.012054603,0.012388818,0.0061031883,0.003483878,0.04368536,0.0014257297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041866344,0.000012347269,0.00065771735,0.00018121801,0.000031951335,0.00013965249,0.0010053827,0.00013236968,0.000079879355,0.034119878,0.95878476,0.004812959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009466392,0.000018200275,0.0067343535,0.00080576475,0.00013557976,0.000060557406,0.00196484,0.00025141696,0.00027243598,0.005128058,0.98433983,0.00019433725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98962677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14636308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14636308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38096195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9900978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128220682","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i1.125","title":"Mi Casa Es Su Casa: <i>Van Breda</i> as the House Rule for Global Securities Class Actions in Ontario","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Jurisdiction; Class action; Misrepresentation; Damages; Shareholder; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.07966346280150141,"score_gpt":0.2932976554087981,"score_spread":0.21363419260729669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128220682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097236924,0.0045635686,0.0026390546,0.1332811,0.0011926331,0.00012708809,0.001199183,0.00011814253,0.75964236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6438575,0.0020876394,0.0019631465,0.029232346,0.00033307087,0.00007144558,0.00034500216,0.000116865915,0.32199308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639976,0.0002748614,0.000080397775,0.00059048296,0.0016190507,0.0010353423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753225,0.00042066735,0.0003179973,0.00020497564,0.0009951257,0.00052906206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012274886,0.0002465728,0.00022908521,0.000589538,0.014108049,0.0071379784,0.0012107781,0.0028552753,0.010069523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004727185,0.00033572392,0.00035372243,0.001264996,0.008682554,0.0021401073,0.0024830739,0.00325688,0.0008360553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005737729,0.000022222366,0.01562827,0.00012878877,0.000020313777,0.0008638211,0.029103057,0.0002108315,0.0009916123,0.68532676,0.24535501,0.022291938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012535547,0.000012411761,0.018157536,0.00012007798,0.00002766045,0.00014735376,0.010278295,0.00022905736,0.0004937901,0.010992233,0.959475,0.00005407546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97679865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06880116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06880116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0805966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49918967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128220956","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v12i1.97","title":"Successful Tobacco Litigation in Quebec: Why Hold Cigarettes to a Higher Standard than Pharmaceutical Products?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Causation; Class action; Damages; Duty to warn; Test (biology); Duty of care; Cause of action; Interpretation (philosophy); Product (mathematics)","score_opus":0.06014535350663752,"score_gpt":0.3221187374384276,"score_spread":0.2619733839317901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128220956","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10413196,0.013096955,0.0023670306,0.6112556,0.0024349021,0.00027026475,0.0006342466,0.00012359304,0.26568538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7289502,0.0057841,0.0016977409,0.16752619,0.0006733214,0.00011210504,0.0002929181,0.000073957824,0.09488952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872479,0.0015879503,0.00037882497,0.001105443,0.005728884,0.003950972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858618,0.003527711,0.00078266696,0.00045647725,0.0067154025,0.002655955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008703568,0.000484813,0.0004505846,0.0019612126,0.027568238,0.012541696,0.004062803,0.01401375,0.014184176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01980093,0.0006527145,0.0009525279,0.0021356582,0.009777405,0.004196541,0.0037161277,0.010792455,0.0011631105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011236446,0.00025433244,0.05413271,0.00043465217,0.00016900439,0.0063104974,0.016731555,0.0017161114,0.0017499387,0.44061565,0.4014088,0.076364376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000359953,0.00018949893,0.10911817,0.0014907065,0.0003265697,0.0015484205,0.035559457,0.0046196734,0.0014770427,0.03730185,0.80752474,0.00048404923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14734264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14734264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20565258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9889617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128221300","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i1.57","title":"The use of Matrix Settlements in Canadian Class Actions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Settlement (finance); Human settlement; Class (philosophy); Compensation (psychology); Matrix (chemical analysis)","score_opus":0.1533918435098147,"score_gpt":0.3068803366885022,"score_spread":0.15348849317868749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128221300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06886743,0.00692335,0.23654705,0.03034105,0.000948964,0.0010117365,0.0014062902,0.0004593437,0.65349483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88498217,0.0031310937,0.06907308,0.0018998632,0.00014392979,0.0002694281,0.0002679445,0.00010663413,0.04012589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97103226,0.0059567536,0.0010853994,0.0025743388,0.0160517,0.0032995087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98111033,0.0072463052,0.0015674965,0.0013971822,0.008179541,0.0004991406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02049424,0.0006037787,0.0006907916,0.007749367,0.010962978,0.010426929,0.003777607,0.002801091,0.0075419284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045848604,0.00084305595,0.0014201225,0.0059007024,0.010488909,0.0049024993,0.004451766,0.002996623,0.0007062427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014337194,0.000008376692,0.0014848453,0.00005794499,0.000009162092,0.00008475446,0.0016088042,0.0059067574,0.00012175347,0.95199555,0.007190474,0.031517062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010473967,0.00009572812,0.018438552,0.00080847944,0.00013753072,0.00041465618,0.00615414,0.06848281,0.0020858864,0.36983684,0.53307164,0.00036896535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9136996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93346995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08630037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082928106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08261262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6016883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128222538","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i2.177","title":"Reconciling Limitation Period Principles with the Purposes and Complexity of Ontario Class Proceedings","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Period (music); Adjudication; Class action; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.09973335154260525,"score_gpt":0.2452948473913408,"score_spread":0.14556149584873557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128222538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06745932,0.042826984,0.023615751,0.2553636,0.0017879079,0.00045329178,0.00038571696,0.00010036277,0.608007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9149313,0.014139899,0.012200401,0.01974954,0.000837286,0.00033138713,0.00014645244,0.000054596414,0.03760906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9296625,0.016274171,0.0051984084,0.0037110518,0.038631428,0.0065224417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92894673,0.0341772,0.0076274145,0.003051657,0.023999937,0.0021970975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041547865,0.00028376025,0.00060886116,0.0061062207,0.016078295,0.018519381,0.0048992205,0.0057992595,0.0029834998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064863905,0.0007084261,0.00069874694,0.005845589,0.026137043,0.007747028,0.005339028,0.006839151,0.00026980232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010489448,0.0000103408765,0.0017616766,0.00035509327,0.000013344405,0.00014587725,0.011283169,0.00043106638,0.00018611512,0.9496173,0.012740093,0.023445478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041734926,0.000047318128,0.026542861,0.0025376445,0.0000899211,0.00018136279,0.018957652,0.0010501966,0.0005662139,0.18295,0.76688904,0.00014602013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8250593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9197952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1749407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11195637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1726382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81230414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128222581","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i2.309","title":"When Numbers Tell A Story: A Quantitative Look at Certification Decisions in Ontario","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Class (philosophy); Class action; Action (physics); Scholarship","score_opus":0.09596527810799173,"score_gpt":0.2893506605083816,"score_spread":0.19338538240038988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128222581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93237334,0.0017149695,0.00067987834,0.008786306,0.000046780166,0.00016205593,0.009468604,0.000020110823,0.046748016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98396814,0.0012180331,0.00041430054,0.00040073958,0.000025820238,0.000054718348,0.0027285137,0.000019561512,0.011170152],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921514,0.0009904174,0.0004232381,0.00052759395,0.0046109934,0.001296424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96257687,0.010061066,0.010365575,0.001003739,0.013751112,0.0022416902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054625534,0.00016462109,0.0003583941,0.006107395,0.0057725706,0.004886484,0.001436382,0.000782259,0.004074073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03205567,0.0002981639,0.00026759275,0.01572707,0.0036562819,0.0020647498,0.0023920336,0.000965871,0.00031276845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016546751,0.00006019746,0.75024575,0.00039700823,0.000097165685,0.0010353117,0.14484027,0.0012549071,0.0008599529,0.019019743,0.03796853,0.044055693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062612007,0.000020543963,0.8577058,0.00016451253,0.00002252948,0.000079454876,0.078242704,0.0007688988,0.0002769706,0.00090626284,0.061749917,0.00005621088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99522334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094836116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.094836116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059327524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6880874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128224353","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i1.29","title":"Canadian Privacy Class Actions at the Crossroads","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Harm; Class (philosophy); Statutory law; Damages; Information privacy; Jurisprudence; Privacy law","score_opus":0.10234758789860363,"score_gpt":0.3087010563084919,"score_spread":0.20635346840988825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128224353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014283427,0.21303716,0.0030692862,0.24949266,0.0037013958,0.00018375367,0.0017447877,0.00017520775,0.5143123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4933118,0.22484164,0.0076244823,0.107843995,0.0019594824,0.00018054576,0.0017179848,0.00026871494,0.16225143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9684513,0.0022484087,0.0008073301,0.0020290867,0.021753853,0.0047100023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95869565,0.0070716813,0.0012109416,0.001118776,0.029611494,0.0022914966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013005847,0.00069808966,0.0008440201,0.007273168,0.022481497,0.014774416,0.004217094,0.0061140824,0.0136915585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033375032,0.0006558304,0.0011501482,0.010556708,0.011879791,0.004298759,0.0037943458,0.00766351,0.0010488254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002886366,0.000025775986,0.0018399399,0.0008110391,0.00003187919,0.00031357884,0.0044396077,0.00046696275,0.00024761623,0.59135395,0.28549132,0.11494952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007321346,0.000009170833,0.004398721,0.0010522136,0.00003936178,0.000097382144,0.0020700218,0.00013394988,0.00024742403,0.010121005,0.98177767,0.000045707257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99266464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20976613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20976613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4387867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9165593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128224900","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i2.379","title":"Book Review: <i>The Class Actions Controversy: The Origins and Development of the Ontario Class Proceedings Act</i> By Suzanne Chiodo","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); World class; Working class; New class","score_opus":0.023819745698018615,"score_gpt":0.24633879383742235,"score_spread":0.22251904813940374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128224900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004149171,0.21513546,0.00025932404,0.55536854,0.08192369,0.00014476472,0.0014174299,0.00011037607,0.1452255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013090795,0.18923129,0.000593374,0.23462495,0.05164843,0.0002654777,0.0013776217,0.00022995577,0.50893813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922328,0.00041118622,0.00024883612,0.00039066674,0.006043473,0.0006730652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691929,0.0065309363,0.0013769084,0.00054626825,0.020476324,0.0018766901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038207048,0.0009048376,0.0011951546,0.0058709243,0.007918731,0.010038419,0.0036247682,0.010775974,0.028570794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024579186,0.00087902095,0.00066056894,0.01042032,0.0070797224,0.0030152146,0.001519823,0.007902811,0.009081286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001273273,9.075406e-7,0.000025330402,0.000044933804,0.0000010021292,0.0000036301933,0.000027008675,0.000006667492,0.0000046775185,0.0013127469,0.9963689,0.0022029611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040133214,0.0000016733428,0.0005790664,0.00029404936,0.000005879604,0.0000092270975,0.000100684156,0.000011442248,0.000009628818,0.00045885224,0.9985159,0.000009590711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8943878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9717221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10561222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068275996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.121413946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49537933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128225383","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i2.321","title":"Developing A Consistent Approach to Balance Distributions in Quebec","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Damages; Distribution (mathematics); Order (exchange); Human settlement; Balance (ability); Settlement (finance); Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.05719553213310316,"score_gpt":0.27342575170274563,"score_spread":0.21623021956964247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128225383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11342872,0.10088985,0.07023019,0.16180186,0.0019072263,0.0038531749,0.0061870795,0.0004639422,0.541238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7656829,0.029629197,0.06493351,0.021783484,0.00027854307,0.0012098564,0.0016951197,0.00012518377,0.11466221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98273176,0.004740506,0.0012805135,0.0014262849,0.0076811286,0.0021398752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.955529,0.0077176644,0.001448692,0.0009765536,0.033482764,0.00084539346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019824509,0.0004796126,0.0005703861,0.00985563,0.009032816,0.0074723936,0.0029863974,0.0024719045,0.0057991166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02826209,0.00052610337,0.00054462295,0.00898157,0.0032401232,0.0028882446,0.00177479,0.002685526,0.00044367524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006321539,0.00012207731,0.01889391,0.0012794832,0.00007554305,0.00085532584,0.009274209,0.007039853,0.0021520634,0.4892941,0.1378591,0.33309108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073555064,0.00009845571,0.047518164,0.0026740741,0.00008642308,0.0002640018,0.010098286,0.0047394074,0.0018979494,0.018864926,0.91350484,0.0001799529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98538536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99321365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15456201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15456201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19575949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98058826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128226642","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i2.395","title":"Our Aging <i>CPA</i> : It’s Time for Ontario to “Opt-In” to a Modern Global Class-Actions Framework","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; CLARITY; Legislature; Enforcement; European union; Settlement (finance); Class (philosophy); Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.07128358913533174,"score_gpt":0.33445849614376033,"score_spread":0.2631749070084286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128226642","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008814468,0.022357617,0.002054961,0.78776896,0.0057704523,0.0001630725,0.000644186,0.000117312746,0.17230901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3177966,0.029551316,0.008981027,0.24166965,0.0030545762,0.00021205419,0.0007163381,0.00026532507,0.39775318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157315,0.00090128166,0.00027795884,0.00074072176,0.004607728,0.0018991043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98106754,0.002837493,0.0005847244,0.0005952311,0.011484917,0.0034300417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008431826,0.00033962753,0.0003934216,0.00168278,0.016448352,0.016434234,0.0023425617,0.0072690337,0.010646698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013194897,0.00039101666,0.00044163797,0.0019078727,0.011931717,0.0038425003,0.0019488132,0.006409524,0.0012943039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022307611,0.000016699885,0.0016950525,0.00019654477,0.000008905009,0.00017309687,0.003007161,0.00018506618,0.0003766999,0.25500426,0.7142536,0.025060557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050591643,0.000007667524,0.0022932591,0.00025292026,0.000012236857,0.000036427547,0.001735323,0.00016163247,0.00023175315,0.005286434,0.98994774,0.000029510225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.980652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15125003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15125003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27374747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98442966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128226701","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v9i1_5","title":"Class Actions in Canada: Conflicting Purposes and Unpredictable Outcomes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Certification; Action (physics); Control (management); New class; Term (time)","score_opus":0.042399503419157554,"score_gpt":0.26369437362000064,"score_spread":0.2212948702008431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128226701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11880079,0.2303563,0.004377643,0.24090004,0.003376732,0.00090402586,0.0056252233,0.00019654816,0.39546266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82437336,0.09167992,0.00393033,0.04152107,0.00089869596,0.00023893394,0.0015728052,0.00011408096,0.035670854],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92587,0.006812381,0.0032367061,0.0030836337,0.051226385,0.009770921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8352996,0.041114546,0.009844134,0.0025385607,0.103948735,0.0072544194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036152724,0.00052894704,0.0009150107,0.012315434,0.016678141,0.017069247,0.0037453547,0.005287427,0.003759044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.088825345,0.00073243637,0.00083554204,0.014733936,0.009328565,0.0025485961,0.0039814436,0.0055698855,0.00037321312],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016458343,0.000089810404,0.03345796,0.0025584155,0.00029694347,0.0012703773,0.0125007145,0.0028613764,0.0007659584,0.34834486,0.3792086,0.21848047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087612185,0.00007197612,0.09714385,0.0048518507,0.0004963043,0.0003511374,0.013071825,0.0017020063,0.0012866219,0.020824471,0.85975254,0.00035977428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99722975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22034386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22034386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4336358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9042906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128226719","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i1.93","title":"Upsetting the Apple Cart: Certifying Class Actions for Food Labelling Reform","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Transparency (behavior); Class (philosophy); Certification; Legislature; Class action; Tying; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.19254362046782583,"score_gpt":0.3175176917761782,"score_spread":0.12497407130835239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128226719","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01688527,0.4131973,0.0043047727,0.22431663,0.0054830234,0.0002491507,0.00022579326,0.00012600057,0.335212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5849002,0.23952265,0.0064713126,0.104965694,0.0031649466,0.00018464039,0.00025035843,0.00010344526,0.06043685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9759093,0.00496765,0.00080171466,0.0010299543,0.01380072,0.0034907027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686763,0.013350226,0.0016578876,0.0013958471,0.013803022,0.0011168012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022183644,0.0003827147,0.00058759225,0.0042097354,0.007442026,0.010156874,0.0033043365,0.008512248,0.0036059322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04018183,0.00031148293,0.0007294793,0.0037936661,0.01284831,0.0035002802,0.0019060532,0.006072115,0.00052297424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025240697,0.000025531479,0.0006216302,0.0011191336,0.000025531795,0.0001635353,0.0030629276,0.00066133525,0.00033391055,0.7741692,0.12702544,0.09276649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029512245,0.000027096581,0.0030112297,0.0024147616,0.000081585225,0.00006637938,0.0017154983,0.00038246848,0.0005474425,0.024477337,0.9671934,0.000053110645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85308677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87749803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14691323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07566422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16347042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5489849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128226945","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v9i1_101","title":"Who Takes the Reins? Carriage in Canada Over the Last Decade","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carriage; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Class action; Duration (music)","score_opus":0.023287705247432698,"score_gpt":0.23269369636388232,"score_spread":0.2094059911164496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128226945","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052905887,0.59401995,0.00083534524,0.14412059,0.0043201176,0.00022743153,0.0024482135,0.00010972664,0.20101278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4210461,0.39639992,0.0020901742,0.050733753,0.0010400284,0.00007207739,0.001888942,0.00012182998,0.12660712],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990908,0.0005021895,0.00046289235,0.0006562174,0.005590144,0.0018804899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97911924,0.0020891968,0.0013080743,0.00026143127,0.015101212,0.002120821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007974301,0.00047508744,0.00069854385,0.004464362,0.009174957,0.008525442,0.0026161724,0.0032742866,0.005392472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014928044,0.0004970936,0.00050006434,0.008729368,0.004953386,0.0015341296,0.001596207,0.0031462244,0.00050857296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118933436,0.00007386943,0.014789285,0.003211171,0.000090845184,0.0011576886,0.01038832,0.0010894816,0.0009749171,0.15203062,0.50415534,0.3119195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007728347,0.000017681154,0.019937288,0.0012431445,0.00004447522,0.00014108096,0.002615152,0.00012386528,0.00025724145,0.0007754038,0.97478867,0.00004825663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17015673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17015673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3465159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9625006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128227546","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v12i2.197","title":"Class Actions, Punitive Damages, and Decreasing Consumption of Tobacco Products","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Class action; Context (archaeology); Consumption (sociology); Damages; Misconduct; Enforcement; Tobacco industry","score_opus":0.11134751075236198,"score_gpt":0.3199324457707194,"score_spread":0.2085849350183574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128227546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18615565,0.00523537,0.007853718,0.046620242,0.0012741564,0.0003211126,0.00024224799,0.00010902429,0.75218844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9461883,0.0010108055,0.0010966709,0.010417266,0.000231979,0.00009414607,0.000050469524,0.0000150806045,0.040895272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99061525,0.002277604,0.00031171518,0.0007861789,0.004066527,0.0019426428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881132,0.004157892,0.0021397015,0.00059821445,0.003421905,0.0015691279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067044604,0.00038516353,0.00031305067,0.0013224996,0.0059089228,0.006061953,0.0015765107,0.006226731,0.01170665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014764487,0.00021657151,0.00059068843,0.00062378944,0.008616782,0.0017560885,0.003410819,0.005903771,0.0007098987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024890868,0.0011614602,0.045883257,0.00045922818,0.00022669882,0.00097324915,0.00550573,0.003880544,0.0025856248,0.7627107,0.07054653,0.105818145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022545925,0.0010492987,0.2118164,0.0019363051,0.00049555156,0.0007533988,0.008341047,0.0075959857,0.0057964334,0.27155685,0.4900546,0.0003786362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.113670126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28008467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8863299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013665871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0154017275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22601694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128227793","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v4i2.399","title":"Ontario’s Class Proceedings Fund: A Good (If Less than Perfect) Class Action Costs Model","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Class action; Control (management)","score_opus":0.0995244795083636,"score_gpt":0.2757512902816063,"score_spread":0.17622681077324268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128227793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024315566,0.006795618,0.024381699,0.13518134,0.0012852954,0.00080702535,0.0036368493,0.0002855948,0.803311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7684196,0.0043538515,0.010670285,0.020018328,0.0010735805,0.0006630162,0.00073636655,0.00013298944,0.19393189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838368,0.002344404,0.00034171864,0.0010885333,0.009675279,0.0027131161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98107576,0.004792387,0.0011984642,0.0014009202,0.00930524,0.002227252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009859362,0.0009186622,0.0010596138,0.0054876273,0.006730668,0.014692281,0.004295446,0.0072824527,0.015535165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02889118,0.0007058652,0.0009293788,0.0039456654,0.007382226,0.0052068233,0.0018316295,0.0041547026,0.0010067986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036881058,0.000022765204,0.0011433476,0.00010672488,0.00003261068,0.000045829893,0.0002740377,0.0026030573,0.0000527096,0.9060848,0.077776834,0.011820474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024879983,0.00006910899,0.010366008,0.0006945839,0.00034518758,0.00013500721,0.0008710414,0.011049237,0.00027694865,0.32089552,0.6548802,0.00016837899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90038174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9375158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099618256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09525746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12609272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69114447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128228888","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v9i1_213","title":"Judicial Consideration of us Proceedings in Canadian Class Action Settlement Approvals","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Class action; Human settlement; Action (physics); Class (philosophy)","score_opus":0.0431715959636538,"score_gpt":0.27511557365874245,"score_spread":0.23194397769508865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128228888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12098985,0.018820088,0.0069747744,0.053165875,0.0036577946,0.0010935426,0.001050028,0.00027847287,0.7939696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8741602,0.008958438,0.008689382,0.025732871,0.0010679055,0.000432379,0.00054569077,0.00010907998,0.080304004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9208254,0.011207799,0.004692936,0.0045245164,0.042146344,0.01660303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9205655,0.031726032,0.0031573623,0.0021908174,0.039827764,0.0025324966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041752663,0.0006919707,0.0010998584,0.008601699,0.033113874,0.017994713,0.0055179964,0.012834721,0.0043121404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10253577,0.0012833953,0.001564195,0.009408696,0.009632065,0.0029716825,0.004462036,0.011862145,0.0005496759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001711609,0.000089042165,0.008240224,0.00039522833,0.00010207587,0.0020325927,0.023579061,0.0011928956,0.0018394089,0.77872384,0.13112265,0.05251177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000128526,0.00014061874,0.028047804,0.0010205574,0.00040149348,0.0005483543,0.014188291,0.0019733424,0.0037475398,0.030503241,0.91882855,0.00047164646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9315409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9709014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086117074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.086117074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16994736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.624826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128229366","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i2.223","title":"Third Party Funding for Class Actions: Problems and Solutions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Third party; Class (philosophy); Economic Justice; Class action; Third world","score_opus":0.13148442767458723,"score_gpt":0.2900929691439829,"score_spread":0.15860854146939568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128229366","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017282117,0.06798905,0.0026596407,0.7972272,0.002943168,0.00010921875,0.0003624174,0.000059243303,0.11136791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64906716,0.09531372,0.0073631573,0.15445034,0.0055081295,0.0003189885,0.00047770853,0.000136433,0.087364286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9560105,0.0062435647,0.001905124,0.0030084066,0.023998946,0.008833417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9438166,0.020906331,0.0048976694,0.0028297082,0.022481095,0.00506867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025652897,0.00057551253,0.000968289,0.0046894657,0.015351892,0.013349978,0.0053407378,0.012101691,0.008417123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059887733,0.0007074889,0.0011951267,0.0068770265,0.018080916,0.0066578216,0.0057780547,0.008441276,0.0006593268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003403871,0.000034208744,0.0061081853,0.00080286054,0.000042581712,0.00060653366,0.0078013344,0.000585073,0.00016511936,0.73053664,0.15892449,0.09435887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000463859,0.00002373391,0.013440278,0.002241136,0.00004438677,0.00023671916,0.011076673,0.0006077628,0.00020316851,0.06345207,0.9085281,0.000099507444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.923168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94501096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1460453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1460453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20880583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9904664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128229371","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v2i2_375","title":"Typicality, Preferable Procedure, and Superiority: Ontario <i>Class Proceedings Act, 1992</i> and Rule 23 of the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Civil procedure; Government (linguistics); Legislation","score_opus":0.022781013862511704,"score_gpt":0.23504190459663885,"score_spread":0.21226089073412713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128229371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042880036,0.039201874,0.0045368467,0.1495182,0.001177574,0.00020794182,0.003093805,0.0000776555,0.759306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8762001,0.015581857,0.004741162,0.016992627,0.0007952099,0.00017152872,0.0009868165,0.000077985256,0.08445281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99127793,0.0013161623,0.0004905316,0.0006080048,0.0051349723,0.0011724631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988289,0.00354499,0.0011463127,0.000491745,0.0059152455,0.0006126575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005106384,0.00029472154,0.00032330176,0.0019677586,0.009461282,0.007750701,0.0014863684,0.004114409,0.0073182215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021074893,0.00043815246,0.00029927687,0.0039255763,0.01485694,0.003945401,0.0014076125,0.0039208303,0.00076982426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035410456,0.000016931117,0.0025741593,0.00008700614,0.000006917731,0.00006754457,0.003933897,0.00012720312,0.000095936855,0.86018753,0.11565959,0.017207887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006525234,0.000035596884,0.064638615,0.00087279227,0.00008419914,0.00016972497,0.008155236,0.0006756116,0.00041863817,0.20369989,0.72105265,0.0001317955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95983595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056738645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056738645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10194802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4116696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128230514","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i2.603","title":"Class Proceedings Vs. Arbitration in Canada: Resolving Class Conflict and Developing Guidelines","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Arbitration; Res judicata; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.05369270424257649,"score_gpt":0.2710420674559669,"score_spread":0.21734936321339038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128230514","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04400935,0.13050574,0.01801157,0.53456926,0.006358657,0.001585909,0.001940069,0.00027209296,0.2627474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71319705,0.07386037,0.041899994,0.09734757,0.0018683461,0.0014345997,0.0013983703,0.0003238053,0.06866998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93468904,0.017862149,0.004127682,0.00254146,0.03138902,0.00939062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.797216,0.07777713,0.009050412,0.0026006126,0.10435994,0.00899588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07271309,0.00062821765,0.001214646,0.015467468,0.021718634,0.017209567,0.0062840274,0.009542453,0.004369255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.176507,0.0011182704,0.000993777,0.016545711,0.009602688,0.0051092673,0.003542118,0.0109376535,0.00040542477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112932015,0.000090126596,0.0067553283,0.0016788567,0.00010476667,0.00027482695,0.014548874,0.0019987414,0.00033679858,0.40139368,0.39187866,0.18082629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017048769,0.000076681135,0.035882894,0.005755909,0.0003929166,0.00012665692,0.01698636,0.0033425041,0.0011436462,0.04128747,0.89449,0.00034436144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18028577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18028577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5577134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9507523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128230674","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v10i1-2.33","title":"Facets of Fairness: <i>Kidd v Canada Life Assurance Company</i> and the Approval of Class Action Settlements","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Settlement (finance); Context (archaeology); Appeal; Human settlement; Pension","score_opus":0.058418378283602156,"score_gpt":0.2645327690796652,"score_spread":0.20611439079606306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128230674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07643289,0.0047882297,0.0070044473,0.16970429,0.0014569162,0.00038073657,0.00029211637,0.00011009642,0.73983026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8596839,0.0011747844,0.0031403261,0.05817533,0.00042494512,0.00020326397,0.00008217676,0.000067498586,0.07704785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9662654,0.0052958075,0.0012544491,0.0033116813,0.013541309,0.010331388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98733044,0.0057280767,0.00073421677,0.00090213754,0.0037462665,0.0015589797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01811829,0.00045929803,0.00081045757,0.0019239691,0.036629282,0.023183698,0.0041003204,0.02051268,0.004795142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036396943,0.0007944991,0.00091532373,0.0021147,0.031108376,0.005277848,0.0071094604,0.018107973,0.00045527206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018424427,0.00002013406,0.0015840413,0.000031824937,0.000010640882,0.00033802513,0.007962432,0.00015643628,0.00016125961,0.96022564,0.023314428,0.006176775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019837086,0.00009611572,0.020651527,0.00077309815,0.00017141752,0.0008225491,0.03177289,0.0025978396,0.0025613764,0.39271733,0.5471524,0.00048502453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87512803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9055894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12487197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0571098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10084457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41436255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128236769","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i1.3","title":"L’étape du Recouvrement en Matière de Recours Collectif : Les Enjeux et les Objectifs Sociaux","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Collective action; Confusion; Authorization; Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.09336310246203268,"score_gpt":0.3144363930022781,"score_spread":0.22107329054024544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128236769","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026517132,0.8249755,0.0013333068,0.033238985,0.0015979704,0.00006721563,0.00035175876,0.00003317646,0.11188503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44034725,0.46414542,0.0021016095,0.0067406762,0.0006561188,0.00006545261,0.00035351777,0.000045467856,0.08554442],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933088,0.0017190574,0.00024285856,0.00045265784,0.0034273788,0.00084922696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906233,0.0020353626,0.00088408793,0.00025409675,0.0056388723,0.0005643547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008236468,0.0004367422,0.00053449336,0.0035554795,0.005923276,0.0073947213,0.0020403224,0.0018664472,0.005561087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010089153,0.00027591264,0.00043140855,0.006257751,0.0063066673,0.0020202,0.0011378061,0.0020620713,0.0004938721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013467474,0.000080250335,0.007862509,0.0044600745,0.00011958656,0.00055859314,0.018489907,0.0014919887,0.00085199735,0.33802378,0.09565105,0.53227556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011989661,0.000031060663,0.023114095,0.0022040147,0.000042582265,0.000111090885,0.0044309893,0.00016826553,0.0002920186,0.0021763914,0.9673761,0.000041469888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.981874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9888887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07406563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07406563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13443446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5373863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128237285","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i2.243","title":"The Fiction of Representative Plaintiff Liability: An Examination of Fee Shifting and Liability for Costs Within the Ontario Class Action Regime","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Discretion; Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Misrepresentation; Liability; Statutory law; Damages","score_opus":0.050010949817039435,"score_gpt":0.2900500588497945,"score_spread":0.24003910903275508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128237285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2387803,0.0049295365,0.008808406,0.05911096,0.00024305764,0.00014413548,0.00015961679,0.000029508823,0.6877944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9581177,0.0021137407,0.0016890924,0.0029942389,0.00011191427,0.000043449058,0.000024120574,0.000014432312,0.034891214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487656,0.0006637359,0.000116325915,0.00036832818,0.0028734545,0.0011016317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496436,0.002562608,0.0005316832,0.0002532326,0.0013849826,0.00030314308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027552198,0.00021984983,0.0002858576,0.0015884798,0.010626842,0.0067277,0.0017347455,0.0036446238,0.0036523528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072513237,0.00035225422,0.00047859873,0.001441448,0.018666016,0.0036265652,0.0026622682,0.0034737613,0.00017326538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013613784,0.000013720505,0.0039731944,0.00005845193,0.000007050463,0.0006703921,0.0128385015,0.0005295804,0.00039210258,0.9673624,0.0048172767,0.009323683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044722117,0.00009167705,0.048192512,0.00077129056,0.00011566308,0.0009936737,0.037523247,0.0064750942,0.0015877603,0.32403117,0.5799772,0.00019610889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87167066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9297745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12832934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09048907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049968947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6565472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128237462","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i2.297","title":"<i>Cy Pres</i> Awards in Canadian Class Actions: A Critical Interrogation of what is Meant By “As Near as Possible”","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Class (philosophy); Settlement (finance); Class action; Ideal (ethics); Human settlement","score_opus":0.02459152054970814,"score_gpt":0.31238086018776184,"score_spread":0.2877893396380537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128237462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081772625,0.08275765,0.0050748778,0.18584932,0.001715651,0.00023397885,0.00031855828,0.000076144875,0.6422012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8995277,0.029133108,0.0028109138,0.02524557,0.0005779153,0.000078160876,0.00008820332,0.000040463765,0.042497948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9745616,0.004684178,0.00086910767,0.0012077376,0.013807294,0.004870094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98107094,0.008632715,0.0013775063,0.00049954146,0.0077464525,0.000672828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017726416,0.00044188852,0.0005383344,0.005332633,0.018959837,0.01548776,0.003878238,0.0067104013,0.0025204914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03166379,0.00044346802,0.00066845387,0.006087551,0.020196978,0.0040553124,0.002860251,0.005921546,0.00018534517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015217064,0.000015726959,0.0014558736,0.0002750522,0.000014689001,0.00027503385,0.010224812,0.0004792323,0.0002899617,0.9292488,0.03086961,0.026835967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051810173,0.00006463431,0.021115799,0.0011739815,0.00014498064,0.0002517093,0.0299367,0.0015332019,0.0015137398,0.07117121,0.8727678,0.00027438832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9747346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12680215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12680215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18506269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92001826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128237509","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i1.261","title":"Class Actions Against Multiple Defendants in Quebec: The Issues of Legal Interest and Standing to Sue","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Res judicata; Class action; Action (physics); Liability","score_opus":0.05856785960879508,"score_gpt":0.2937398207074044,"score_spread":0.23517196109860933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128237509","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14304686,0.29668042,0.0019808316,0.3133435,0.006253712,0.00077941327,0.0059725344,0.00012015331,0.23182254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67336804,0.12316,0.0026205112,0.07322948,0.0018060087,0.00035162273,0.0023726672,0.00009594018,0.12299581],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837414,0.0019856424,0.0010326764,0.0008181255,0.008897783,0.003524319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9478246,0.012780417,0.0038004362,0.00078804005,0.030242987,0.004563543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017675277,0.0006081194,0.0011047876,0.009345666,0.016329287,0.008901169,0.0052578337,0.011360841,0.00674644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03681067,0.0008086883,0.0010478467,0.011580725,0.004754733,0.0024204198,0.001921216,0.008463783,0.0005389058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028623533,0.00017645399,0.043708738,0.0018766285,0.00034389735,0.0010957604,0.007873435,0.0017111275,0.00048190012,0.0657464,0.7095973,0.1671022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002448928,0.000115612136,0.21536952,0.0051525403,0.0008989271,0.00041216778,0.014427218,0.0017499216,0.0006915763,0.0053811367,0.7551657,0.0003907344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99886775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110427774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.110427774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2973488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8012133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128239136","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i2.331","title":"La Dissuasion : 10 Ans de Jurisprudence Canadienne en Matière D’autorisation D’exerc er un Recours Collectif","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Jurisprudence; Function (biology); Analogy; Class action","score_opus":0.0146396095692635,"score_gpt":0.25647703678614386,"score_spread":0.24183742721688037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128239136","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017834311,0.06630133,0.0032003259,0.6757661,0.012176184,0.00009504405,0.00023303801,0.00012371103,0.22426991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45056662,0.023371328,0.0064282133,0.3554255,0.006861025,0.00019223959,0.00020202545,0.00022231745,0.15673077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96907055,0.005737335,0.0012216709,0.0031918206,0.017705686,0.0030729382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96699667,0.013601969,0.001125202,0.0014591864,0.015151766,0.0016652676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020152714,0.0006186444,0.0008100932,0.002660313,0.015763152,0.016504329,0.0039256453,0.014394473,0.0038702548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03235155,0.00046790863,0.0010725647,0.002881107,0.03619477,0.005651692,0.0049577006,0.020640926,0.0012712973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003911668,0.000025371693,0.00066208217,0.00016958486,0.000012422147,0.00025078843,0.01427352,0.00011985273,0.00046964036,0.83104175,0.13508809,0.017847836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002893336,0.00001731931,0.0026116874,0.00042559614,0.000022220904,0.00013392272,0.0041395095,0.00022180709,0.00039839584,0.038594052,0.95334214,0.000064391774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82330453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81526965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17669547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07781322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.107245125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5645771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128239228","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i1.119","title":"Preliminary Merits Review for Class Actions in Ontario: Thanks, but no Thanks!","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Control (management); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.055224077668961084,"score_gpt":0.28655557755995764,"score_spread":0.23133149989099655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128239228","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009194661,0.029085439,0.0016826441,0.55907804,0.066655815,0.004464897,0.01644485,0.0006630198,0.3127307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040599164,0.0146496715,0.0041513597,0.1299098,0.0094894525,0.0016395404,0.0065550287,0.00038420188,0.7926218],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96735805,0.0015701057,0.002231749,0.0012679442,0.022636183,0.004936057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8327104,0.008753576,0.0034305742,0.003927908,0.14022548,0.010952044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01970668,0.0008735359,0.0014736055,0.00616426,0.011251689,0.009756956,0.0042759567,0.01626618,0.04209415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075747706,0.0012689735,0.0018215238,0.005902224,0.0030410155,0.002728294,0.0023814416,0.008045523,0.008405729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043036136,0.000015426353,0.0007248603,0.00022879556,0.000016121368,0.00008243288,0.0002484763,0.000026303096,0.00014398765,0.0031176032,0.9869926,0.008360311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036589186,0.000014306055,0.005133637,0.0002685141,0.000042698794,0.000025392756,0.00028207016,0.000047333127,0.00013216355,0.00033439338,0.9936521,0.000030845313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93873686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97575253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0738363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0738363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31203556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5357224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128239449","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v9i2.271","title":"Paving the Way for Overtime Class Actions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Overtime; Legislation; Class (philosophy); Appeal; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.05720415587066531,"score_gpt":0.2835470121437708,"score_spread":0.22634285627310552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128239449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04622346,0.032301646,0.01203184,0.15689749,0.005637978,0.0011922676,0.00085541664,0.0004014866,0.7444585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58692586,0.013326431,0.011742619,0.069853075,0.0017231068,0.00045253156,0.0008944357,0.00019162217,0.3148904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9461686,0.004800343,0.0021878404,0.0031671266,0.033881508,0.009794595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9491927,0.014520644,0.0048149624,0.0028041601,0.024231965,0.0044355416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021809027,0.00045217964,0.0006092329,0.0037446965,0.014440006,0.01212793,0.0052073817,0.009346676,0.009805237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05091631,0.0007288192,0.0008261738,0.0019903886,0.009727089,0.0038652061,0.004146354,0.010871422,0.0015496403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006142576,0.000084506915,0.0046552354,0.0006760228,0.000026246691,0.000768992,0.012711435,0.00052205025,0.0016981115,0.513832,0.31251633,0.15244767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027374987,0.000039222916,0.010460703,0.0006763776,0.00002218789,0.00011616269,0.0029214066,0.00019226363,0.000621425,0.007810265,0.9770396,0.00007303158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84052444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92079085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15947556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059324067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19555376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43042827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128241995","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i2.339","title":"Using Class Actions to Redress Historical Wrongs Committed by the Government","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Class action; Settlement (finance); Government (linguistics); Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Compensation (psychology)","score_opus":0.08871225043902511,"score_gpt":0.28598279306185076,"score_spread":0.19727054262282565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128241995","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010887722,0.7831681,0.002563711,0.046659462,0.002737841,0.00015793247,0.00007959457,0.00006748284,0.15367812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3625945,0.584463,0.004730287,0.018095465,0.0009802596,0.00010826773,0.00011995636,0.000044275377,0.02886403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.981573,0.0052732816,0.0010440187,0.00074944546,0.008841943,0.0025184294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97905934,0.008596909,0.0024057948,0.0008587739,0.008379183,0.0006999607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019862162,0.00044090414,0.0007328856,0.0074301832,0.0049565597,0.007035124,0.0029584991,0.0032606234,0.00216494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023458315,0.00026701068,0.00060710014,0.004856051,0.011354025,0.0027202687,0.00198197,0.0032707788,0.00041814288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003287941,0.00006340011,0.0018953491,0.0036526355,0.000091850794,0.0003184383,0.0065314504,0.00080723286,0.0004844328,0.5241594,0.087298684,0.37466428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017412063,0.000050674673,0.0050653946,0.0048192274,0.00011319623,0.00017940016,0.0039661266,0.00014109765,0.0006274344,0.009151773,0.9758118,0.000056416426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6409262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7564423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35907382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027366385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06737674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72237694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128246489","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i1.71","title":"Palpable and Overriding Confusion: Appellate Review of Certification Orders in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Appeal; Class action; Legislature; Class (philosophy); Order (exchange); Civil procedure","score_opus":0.06503410693382024,"score_gpt":0.23473476106393015,"score_spread":0.16970065413010993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128246489","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26205352,0.024368737,0.0070770965,0.4465096,0.002757424,0.00076173735,0.0005892563,0.00027801492,0.25560465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91152966,0.0057783984,0.0041750716,0.0439133,0.0003908018,0.000076346645,0.00019267252,0.00006917061,0.0338746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9349867,0.008681048,0.0036045674,0.0039449055,0.035558112,0.013224595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.858718,0.040432032,0.008174438,0.0040139817,0.07741547,0.011246093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032247018,0.0002408102,0.0006901497,0.0046264976,0.024804043,0.016626708,0.004404357,0.00854177,0.002431062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.113928646,0.0009514441,0.00060790207,0.006198172,0.011476995,0.0030292976,0.005085325,0.007527355,0.00026463898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019316631,0.00022042547,0.07139932,0.0010106912,0.00020870232,0.005275382,0.07262965,0.0052857837,0.0033521324,0.391324,0.2546309,0.19446982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001003084,0.00013503004,0.14079371,0.001157133,0.00020366115,0.0008552983,0.035278033,0.004355389,0.002079506,0.020251669,0.7941977,0.000592575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9887111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99557257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19526535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19526535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4008652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9333781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128246501","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v9i2.355","title":"Accumulating Wisdom: An Updated Empirical Examination of Class Counsel’s Fees in Ontario Class Actions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Empirical research; Empirical examination; Compensation (psychology); Class action; World class","score_opus":0.11257524384915082,"score_gpt":0.3275921803295762,"score_spread":0.21501693648042539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128246501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8922899,0.0035506866,0.00044826788,0.0075524016,0.000063600346,0.00014557056,0.0014419344,0.00001211484,0.09449552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99106604,0.001862654,0.0002888423,0.00044571667,0.000033367785,0.000027466,0.00038445153,0.000008201924,0.0058833314],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98598653,0.0010020422,0.00061965897,0.00055360165,0.01036521,0.0014729938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.891259,0.031206211,0.022638302,0.0021712952,0.048703127,0.004022062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009280456,0.00016917169,0.0005872407,0.008341867,0.007864814,0.005458718,0.0016917057,0.0009756795,0.004643521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074407645,0.000302907,0.00024321917,0.011183915,0.003531016,0.0028930523,0.002203243,0.0015376272,0.0002466459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011941635,0.00012742802,0.7153781,0.000548093,0.000105500796,0.00072932435,0.11866487,0.00060664635,0.0003250327,0.032061275,0.02293521,0.1083991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011762053,0.000026542266,0.9081201,0.00040826015,0.00007403438,0.00010030741,0.043690976,0.0004600691,0.00016790738,0.0012908106,0.04560588,0.000043285218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97759205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99220055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076211415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.076211415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11133322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55295515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128246541","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v5i1.49","title":"U.S. Protective Orders in Canadian Class Actions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.06526268784111834,"score_gpt":0.27838581895204695,"score_spread":0.21312313111092862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128246541","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01877611,0.50780106,0.0008721419,0.11445737,0.004686555,0.00025527467,0.009679689,0.00012961587,0.3433422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47229978,0.39080682,0.0026965328,0.052930042,0.0018596,0.0002241007,0.0073438673,0.00012668164,0.07171261],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985129,0.00087753433,0.00085110747,0.00073292974,0.0100934105,0.0023160751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9352345,0.008610525,0.0036645893,0.0010760698,0.048781052,0.0026332482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011155143,0.00050841767,0.00058305974,0.011069372,0.0069193193,0.008687809,0.002855331,0.003294996,0.006331183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041512094,0.00053994625,0.0007525263,0.019236626,0.0032182918,0.0017651931,0.0012948342,0.0040828255,0.0006208393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009584559,0.000032069063,0.0054757064,0.0019633586,0.00006045805,0.00014101845,0.0017495643,0.0007937328,0.0002194392,0.104239486,0.7254857,0.15974362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028621474,0.000023553712,0.03751634,0.0023458216,0.00016013987,0.000064495245,0.001199357,0.00017596885,0.0002983322,0.0023181362,0.9558042,0.00006504381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99181414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99539196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11970166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11970166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28402483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8685004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128248843","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v4i2.459","title":"De La Théorie des Troubles de Voisinage en Matière de Recours Collectif; Un Débat Clos?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neighbourhood (mathematics); Plaintiff; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Annoyance","score_opus":0.024865746114377137,"score_gpt":0.26645084098045635,"score_spread":0.2415850948660792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128248843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070661284,0.02742678,0.09380727,0.14935331,0.0008158328,0.000094867646,0.00042821805,0.00018308326,0.6572294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9121422,0.007207663,0.006553761,0.0031013465,0.00076798967,0.00008313238,0.00009105697,0.000114775656,0.06993806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696475,0.0009034107,0.00006673538,0.0005079593,0.0008624822,0.00069462054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949656,0.0022886717,0.0006606972,0.0007585405,0.0009629383,0.00036355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003971487,0.000669785,0.0010560136,0.002940136,0.00547422,0.00785188,0.004076947,0.0052426327,0.020567581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010465871,0.00068746874,0.0012656467,0.0029705127,0.032820486,0.014458816,0.0033112627,0.005441876,0.0015765723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018995426,0.000003549229,0.0002209322,0.00000995988,0.000002399102,0.00002511217,0.00047196835,0.0003005268,0.0000058337196,0.99619484,0.0014604836,0.0013025313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009801707,0.0000048856377,0.00090605684,0.000077224286,0.000008040142,0.00009049485,0.0008464488,0.0023127145,0.000026793372,0.95822024,0.037483674,0.000013555035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2973423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25071293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7026577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027427068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010095884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5912231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128249169","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v4i1.83","title":"Multiple Defendant Class Actions in Quebec: Recent Developments in the Jurisprudence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Legislation","score_opus":0.06809456782126774,"score_gpt":0.3070941885239821,"score_spread":0.23899962070271438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128249169","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021766955,0.6633519,0.0023360818,0.20071043,0.0056331772,0.000203581,0.001924275,0.00009053369,0.103983074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39242068,0.44901106,0.005322743,0.0803311,0.0042926604,0.00023871922,0.0016980919,0.00013904227,0.06654584],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801477,0.002638152,0.0015687805,0.001753852,0.01180477,0.0020867768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9121919,0.030823814,0.0051765777,0.001098601,0.047116883,0.003592243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023302492,0.0006872647,0.00167969,0.013303412,0.010344664,0.01342921,0.0061128214,0.009785766,0.009437636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047460977,0.0008662484,0.0012162704,0.016493086,0.006570434,0.0036008356,0.0020986572,0.007040086,0.00042686335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020266061,0.00015539463,0.016024133,0.0053667007,0.00030732874,0.0008761608,0.0052658087,0.0031458803,0.00060157385,0.16992238,0.46389553,0.3342365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011039258,0.000060528688,0.06252387,0.004640263,0.00037569663,0.00028574542,0.0027119266,0.0013019805,0.00037927862,0.0065418975,0.9208811,0.00018730138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99381495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99761665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17345706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17345706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3258005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95867264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128250562","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v10i1-2.173","title":"The Impact of the Supreme Court of Canada’s Decision in <i>Infineon Technologies AG v Option Consommateurs</i> on Quebec Class Actions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Class (philosophy); Authorization; Action (physics); Class action; High Court","score_opus":0.04769267322101335,"score_gpt":0.28922603854750994,"score_spread":0.2415333653264966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128250562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06729055,0.03666499,0.0011936784,0.30780777,0.004588868,0.0002667657,0.002289148,0.000102599006,0.57979566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72132784,0.01477896,0.0013468248,0.14206603,0.0014099138,0.00012530606,0.0006947828,0.000109498586,0.11814089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783174,0.002243736,0.0006942477,0.0015820048,0.010588022,0.0065745725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9594665,0.015847487,0.0011689595,0.00082951353,0.019647088,0.0030405056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01519447,0.00053654966,0.00079071324,0.004169009,0.017963585,0.014377449,0.0047084307,0.012873257,0.008185633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03788021,0.00074134726,0.001227567,0.0040507275,0.008576678,0.002680389,0.0021539212,0.0126468055,0.00063836743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017421569,0.000064345266,0.0054534962,0.00042303323,0.00012897195,0.0011230638,0.0039533013,0.0013458374,0.0008876865,0.53710735,0.4124396,0.036899157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025318377,0.00008840165,0.033039223,0.001681006,0.00047328978,0.00018427998,0.005409115,0.0016247731,0.0018869352,0.021501256,0.93340313,0.00045538673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9926407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99647695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17476115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17476115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23797491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9571601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128250618","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i2.293","title":"Class Action Trends in Quebec and What they Mean for Your Business","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Appeal; Res judicata; Class action; Supreme court; Petitioner; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.06444011967867375,"score_gpt":0.29970025783485493,"score_spread":0.2352601381561812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128250618","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06805101,0.30671278,0.00093409256,0.34125325,0.0020128102,0.00008863056,0.002428876,0.000096834425,0.2784218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7509076,0.13427284,0.0016636843,0.03954839,0.00067149336,0.000058725127,0.00094998855,0.000076138516,0.0718512],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551445,0.0005718581,0.00014615302,0.00034752197,0.0021043567,0.001315613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98838824,0.0018604624,0.001045045,0.0002527753,0.0068628117,0.001590712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004740963,0.00026121075,0.00031724194,0.003666409,0.008346444,0.010362233,0.0020853688,0.0027732723,0.012465792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008647259,0.00022957782,0.00045253473,0.005459492,0.006025532,0.002384354,0.00094295514,0.0030072008,0.0005759562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081322505,0.00010169687,0.029051842,0.0011259228,0.000058423433,0.0005405138,0.0129027,0.0008438105,0.0005912308,0.30563653,0.3674306,0.28163543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015336867,0.00002664824,0.07157663,0.0016997905,0.00004024321,0.00014578065,0.009024722,0.0002808246,0.00020702324,0.003958995,0.9129519,0.00007216878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99585766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1787107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1787107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1544657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9525792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128250779","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i2.215","title":"Pharmaceutical Class Actions and Effective Behaviour Modification: Avoiding Ford <i>Pintos</i> Through Punitive Damages","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Deterrence (psychology); Deterrence theory; Damages; Class action; Supreme court","score_opus":0.17363372383199696,"score_gpt":0.3460725674421547,"score_spread":0.17243884361015774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128250779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042509016,0.075717,0.017672487,0.15625899,0.0015782046,0.00030451585,0.000051253486,0.00010552992,0.70580304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86464643,0.022459459,0.006026156,0.042238966,0.00059901696,0.00012676998,0.00002589507,0.00001868164,0.063858524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98881394,0.0028026677,0.0004050876,0.0006209087,0.0055848965,0.0017724794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98914707,0.005859451,0.0018716477,0.0005031861,0.00214464,0.00047393297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006016939,0.000360202,0.0003317916,0.0014594253,0.0041349772,0.005529,0.002106568,0.00624167,0.0032460052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016949432,0.00018835747,0.00047818306,0.00084988354,0.013115883,0.0020555407,0.0023276042,0.0041921693,0.00030257623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021111597,0.0000533173,0.0017924666,0.0003207775,0.000020331694,0.0003060393,0.0024347573,0.000958722,0.0002912582,0.89002335,0.017477464,0.086300366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081862294,0.0002041784,0.016434515,0.001954263,0.00014150918,0.00093138654,0.0051264134,0.002135803,0.0026276463,0.21849214,0.75173396,0.00013625674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28132236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44343454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28132236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015398489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03463815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5593698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128345068","doi":"","title":"Alternative Dispute Resolution","year":2012,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Quarter (Canadian coin); Mediation; Czech; Payment","score_opus":0.011172201129486116,"score_gpt":0.24107760692343794,"score_spread":0.22990540579395183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128345068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007940216,0.009236947,0.24435633,0.027123677,0.010867156,0.001863526,0.0007232118,0.00086001464,0.697029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35846812,0.00825449,0.21241356,0.013443352,0.004311704,0.0023903023,0.001671716,0.000668849,0.3983779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9513559,0.021806583,0.004301637,0.005214797,0.014514164,0.0028068863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9595156,0.015892984,0.0033404462,0.009735546,0.009591105,0.001924316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032035686,0.0010508867,0.0013005103,0.0038481331,0.008378964,0.0154203875,0.006769139,0.0071741543,0.07263948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065656275,0.0006528775,0.0021203363,0.0033254405,0.0091058975,0.01250082,0.01727779,0.0072246604,0.015422605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054687247,0.0000518852,0.0002562931,0.00042074514,0.000027253403,0.00034957158,0.002937517,0.00031114707,0.00028336231,0.8737833,0.046176713,0.07534754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000350597,0.00003722109,0.00012329969,0.0006058397,0.00001865608,0.00043049862,0.0020764126,0.0009757944,0.0005544884,0.25595394,0.7391477,0.000041046802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014676745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018069597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07263948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057929726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01043778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24300325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132876918","doi":"","title":"Effecting a Culture Shift: An Empirical Review of Ontario&apos;s Summary Judgment Reforms","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Summary judgment; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Empirical research; Dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.03836971029072461,"score_gpt":0.372142806613266,"score_spread":0.3337730963225414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132876918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7865298,0.11705131,0.00062726,0.016369168,0.0002961835,0.00027217472,0.004860975,0.000026113834,0.0739671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92751795,0.065187156,0.0005520338,0.0018083814,0.000089559064,0.00007579122,0.001229099,0.000020701997,0.003519262],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888061,0.001589462,0.0008938413,0.00064778933,0.0069233007,0.0011395189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91011816,0.025168391,0.019418377,0.0021252008,0.03984689,0.0033230751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009361947,0.00017130606,0.00054164825,0.005400163,0.00486696,0.0049426877,0.0011676591,0.00053496077,0.002080336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040964093,0.0002803788,0.00043374373,0.01915231,0.0036053157,0.0021272453,0.0015379522,0.00094715465,0.00016149129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023955936,0.000144822,0.49433383,0.009748152,0.00044872597,0.0010278947,0.15658155,0.0007159798,0.0012368219,0.021078225,0.036616538,0.27782792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001192764,0.00004379616,0.8117908,0.003158707,0.00017311,0.00009676341,0.059899293,0.00013657127,0.00029353274,0.00035655522,0.1239853,0.000053647593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9632536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98578066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07464306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07464306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13288043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54157585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132887135","doi":"","title":"Mediation as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism in international joint ventures","year":2003,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec; Bibliographical Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Dispute resolution; Joint (building); Dispute mechanism; Mechanism (biology); Alternative dispute resolution; International joint venture; Joint venture","score_opus":0.02262175097501032,"score_gpt":0.31569206002249844,"score_spread":0.2930703090474881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132887135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12067784,0.008136267,0.25061503,0.01731599,0.0010242648,0.0007576052,0.0000862439,0.00017079957,0.601216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93734795,0.002148309,0.037382882,0.000628917,0.00028369445,0.00038100174,0.000049656228,0.00003493512,0.021742577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.976364,0.01577946,0.001085243,0.0010667444,0.0036496685,0.002054862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97477484,0.01837787,0.0023339004,0.0027403515,0.0011942505,0.0005788585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019828804,0.0005236499,0.0006860031,0.002074544,0.0052817827,0.014824947,0.0030199613,0.005390452,0.010911562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030267188,0.0006446111,0.0013462969,0.0031436814,0.015804628,0.015288497,0.0067909546,0.0059246854,0.00106583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011549744,0.000015710826,0.000080666556,0.000020436917,0.0000030185852,0.000077277364,0.00076917565,0.00044828834,0.00009600169,0.99537367,0.00027205833,0.0028322393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001360315,0.000070037575,0.00028835243,0.00019709213,0.000036004563,0.00031112897,0.002624315,0.0073812585,0.0012294076,0.9366168,0.051068366,0.0000412681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018908061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013986988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019828804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049022436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004180628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10486603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132944279","doi":"","title":"An Economic Assessment of Third Party Litigation Funding of Ontario Class Actions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Permission; Third party; Class action; Economic analysis; World class","score_opus":0.04112571396201386,"score_gpt":0.3290564495581961,"score_spread":0.2879307355961822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132944279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59749395,0.0059295073,0.0014614656,0.009403152,0.00015508263,0.0007810802,0.012605247,0.00008290207,0.37208763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97365993,0.0016020145,0.0003412451,0.00023132766,0.000059964386,0.00013050932,0.0013030821,0.0000129938335,0.022658786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878035,0.0012594457,0.0003337383,0.00033987768,0.007555359,0.002708226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830981,0.0061900173,0.0027737883,0.0005884053,0.005568208,0.0017815029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004102691,0.00039006522,0.0005255067,0.0054271906,0.00305279,0.0067925504,0.0012913641,0.0014893777,0.011102013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027804123,0.0004482045,0.0010627578,0.0065880236,0.0018124888,0.001777239,0.0017991902,0.0012142406,0.00047117053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005367942,0.00059165596,0.32056174,0.001401443,0.0010367855,0.0016019504,0.003282719,0.04679064,0.00175416,0.37265334,0.093023,0.15193462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088626414,0.0010120093,0.74927646,0.00062109606,0.0014568766,0.0004397465,0.0072814142,0.047265206,0.0019703964,0.021706995,0.16775598,0.0003274935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9390071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96478766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12910323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12910323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07409641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9367139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132989246","doi":"","title":"The reconciliation of class actions, commercial arbitration and consumer rights","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Compulsory arbitration; Legislation; Arbitration clause; Class (philosophy); Supreme court","score_opus":0.03238055110191788,"score_gpt":0.34105961932974554,"score_spread":0.30867906822782765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132989246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03210277,0.0048614363,0.039618026,0.020798996,0.0002305041,0.00011014646,0.000043682856,0.000031143492,0.9022033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9362595,0.0018743982,0.0083959,0.0026293376,0.00018259323,0.00010656696,0.00003609085,0.000032279757,0.05048333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887921,0.004131859,0.0002813568,0.0008533541,0.0036754056,0.0022658769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952689,0.0023470954,0.0005126579,0.0006972805,0.0008705672,0.0003033857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0111693535,0.00044135435,0.00062099734,0.0021046705,0.007665127,0.011965477,0.0021489717,0.0041332557,0.0070538027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010805638,0.00033233583,0.0006631463,0.002423905,0.05346698,0.0066612186,0.006715692,0.0041534128,0.00045086304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014845015,0.0000018934443,0.000038303584,0.0000040609584,9.1556007e-7,0.000011480603,0.00070543075,0.00007864611,0.000017426906,0.99690884,0.0003186556,0.001912872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012206195,0.000007644104,0.0006534091,0.00010565188,0.000008155938,0.000045965513,0.0016163004,0.0005809774,0.00018974062,0.9282705,0.068495,0.000014468752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2208383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2221232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2208383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026272202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028206998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43910575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133008001","doi":"","title":"Court-connected alternative dispute resolution: the Ontario mandatory mediation program and the German obligatory settlement procedure. Approaches to achieving early case settlement: a comparative analysis","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Settlement (finance); German; Legislature; Alternative dispute resolution; Civil procedure; Session (web analytics)","score_opus":0.05308464670885633,"score_gpt":0.3232640443923588,"score_spread":0.27017939768350246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133008001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35414305,0.007908143,0.01637205,0.0059249257,0.00012095922,0.0005391648,0.0003972827,0.00003653194,0.614558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97423595,0.0018875141,0.0035521497,0.00024660194,0.000016533908,0.00011162873,0.00014385041,0.000010780943,0.01979501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920123,0.0017848549,0.00017567552,0.00036448505,0.004158525,0.0015041062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962353,0.0014188304,0.00056972436,0.00030403497,0.0010846725,0.00038746698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038492025,0.00022137523,0.00025054815,0.0020848797,0.0043996344,0.0043932623,0.0017725149,0.0012556167,0.010032075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010851581,0.0002217927,0.0004920339,0.0032144543,0.0067678434,0.0029759805,0.0024614097,0.00095883844,0.00046443543],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015344181,0.00012087649,0.008579078,0.0002734843,0.00003653628,0.00026879332,0.0076842094,0.0016571566,0.00069420785,0.90855813,0.00403164,0.06794245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045741003,0.0007180159,0.29611257,0.001274067,0.0006176392,0.0009864982,0.058143266,0.024273539,0.004027867,0.17444472,0.43871498,0.00022943717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62883174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8298773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37116826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033911623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034350526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7467083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133016431","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Approval of Class Counsel&apos;s Fees in Ontario Class Actions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Res judicata; Incentive; Legislation; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.07669664745852536,"score_gpt":0.32219451696492624,"score_spread":0.24549786950640087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133016431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9225416,0.0006834292,0.0021550087,0.006911714,0.000062883846,0.00027956866,0.00038761293,0.00003839828,0.06693981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99298555,0.00022055506,0.0012165337,0.0006019091,0.000025441148,0.00003482287,0.000071697905,0.000010299425,0.0048332],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97186905,0.0027609938,0.0012436351,0.001279804,0.018674098,0.0041724467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.960391,0.017863719,0.008564684,0.0019149396,0.0096219685,0.0016437105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012018833,0.00017395898,0.00038343616,0.0042777555,0.0062646074,0.006092793,0.002107288,0.0017355079,0.0027018173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07365409,0.0004197595,0.00041337794,0.0037935472,0.004832172,0.0016587211,0.002109731,0.0015954769,0.00025074842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026914277,0.00023663613,0.5535223,0.0002630493,0.00012590845,0.00202105,0.04450017,0.00793673,0.0058840485,0.13845694,0.025426624,0.22135754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005345784,0.000107223685,0.8951976,0.00016082496,0.0000892679,0.0002515012,0.01647758,0.006135387,0.002140102,0.00490213,0.074371964,0.000112937785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8616683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9525243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13833171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056063846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048863526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40677357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133065444","doi":"","title":"Are provisinal remedies superseding the trial process?","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Formality; Settlement (finance); Context (archaeology); Civil procedure; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.04778766939722823,"score_gpt":0.3750540859345266,"score_spread":0.3272664165372984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133065444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038799074,0.022016833,0.0472629,0.24853446,0.006909448,0.00054642156,0.0001796444,0.00033521588,0.635416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.886063,0.008655038,0.020181471,0.03235655,0.0055949274,0.0005477536,0.00008148598,0.00015782,0.04636204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9582264,0.014613352,0.0025732107,0.0046112933,0.015078193,0.0048975046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9493968,0.028287997,0.007397618,0.008088467,0.004934234,0.0018949193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03453659,0.00046724922,0.0015382912,0.0021914847,0.0048093214,0.014358008,0.004439304,0.014377531,0.017395997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.121205084,0.0005213169,0.0010267544,0.0013009277,0.029673915,0.020706993,0.005177652,0.011850457,0.0038719908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005585882,0.0000557944,0.0003095971,0.00010482903,0.000012503444,0.00007124985,0.00053569576,0.00019338372,0.000114964285,0.969073,0.0043613873,0.025111679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016661227,0.0001471619,0.0012026038,0.00055772346,0.00004548714,0.000252726,0.0015542514,0.0007126217,0.0007262149,0.87845755,0.1161303,0.000046862857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037643334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004733421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03453659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004056788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013309189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18264908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133068805","doi":"","title":"Whose Justice? A Comparative Approach to Canadian Civil Lay Justice","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Economic Justice; German; Civil society; Democracy; Civil liberties; Civil procedure","score_opus":0.07078701562813074,"score_gpt":0.34817257861789697,"score_spread":0.27738556298976624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133068805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06678689,0.026177574,0.0020575803,0.044092458,0.00071912695,0.00019478149,0.00026049907,0.000019612122,0.85969144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9276638,0.022745786,0.003028798,0.006106471,0.00016057139,0.00017284013,0.00017617668,0.000034568882,0.039910913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913617,0.0032260409,0.00014515327,0.000522883,0.0022299627,0.0025143896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99270016,0.002829953,0.0002862259,0.00019861052,0.002879331,0.0011057552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062014097,0.00054904545,0.0007450322,0.008875058,0.04884827,0.016288437,0.0030890515,0.004208686,0.009478221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011116608,0.00038912354,0.00045844683,0.013420967,0.021219183,0.006117517,0.004824456,0.004441092,0.00036498441],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021110682,0.00003757121,0.0016500218,0.00019254435,0.000010166662,0.0006095232,0.061712522,0.00025228533,0.000097543896,0.90493244,0.0146810645,0.015803266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020068113,0.000035378453,0.013971246,0.0013193464,0.00004641376,0.00043064036,0.38284677,0.0010587223,0.00018806806,0.05769015,0.54230446,0.000088775836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9816784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99127287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24448377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24448377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15771936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87629175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135057556","doi":"10.13140/rg.2.2.12506.61122","title":"POLICY REVIEW ON PROPOSED FUNDING CUTS TO PRISONS AND THE CANADIAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Legislature; Work (physics); Commission","score_opus":0.024525580310556065,"score_gpt":0.2640610898647937,"score_spread":0.23953550955423764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135057556","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008693665,0.15372337,0.0009749789,0.47463518,0.0107793305,0.00054036896,0.0045455443,0.00016498014,0.34594256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21435785,0.28514683,0.0050755986,0.2672442,0.009967138,0.0008274829,0.004351939,0.00022429171,0.21280469],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9581639,0.004250894,0.0017077035,0.0016087925,0.022792062,0.011476547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9071506,0.021231322,0.0023289141,0.0011328373,0.06364649,0.004509776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023214446,0.0016205019,0.00197157,0.01837682,0.017600967,0.019770708,0.008093853,0.018712677,0.021946033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061596476,0.0013495114,0.0024487542,0.017408563,0.009513725,0.0041869134,0.0029464387,0.012023789,0.0015279358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009269261,0.00006093243,0.0017950588,0.0018475179,0.00010297229,0.00024964192,0.0012831381,0.002300551,0.00034059878,0.2593206,0.6870801,0.04552624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010363385,0.000038511607,0.010488101,0.0051946044,0.00024426612,0.00006336799,0.002067071,0.0006374378,0.0003394846,0.008581375,0.9720825,0.0001596886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9933775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.734998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26500204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5419137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85249346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135798486","doi":"","title":"Out-of-Court-Settlement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.08310770960278882,"score_gpt":0.2686865708852321,"score_spread":0.1855788612824433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135798486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14979786,0.00047684676,0.011859561,0.0034214281,0.0007923584,0.0002816881,0.00051357143,0.00018499048,0.8326717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9093085,0.00017097223,0.0013106052,0.00089080783,0.00015984447,0.000071969946,0.00029427052,0.00010548251,0.087687574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864972,0.003916477,0.0008294978,0.0016504064,0.004176261,0.002930043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794335,0.0098107355,0.0016085223,0.004768945,0.0028329222,0.0015453142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009252832,0.0004940689,0.000798953,0.0018562822,0.0073898993,0.007969531,0.0021571182,0.0039071143,0.066783465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046538554,0.0005130449,0.00066747377,0.0016385948,0.0026312748,0.00455151,0.0056274626,0.0057539637,0.0067026853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007468215,0.0009310237,0.015868038,0.00020901259,0.00008597687,0.002011976,0.01681985,0.0013798567,0.0025872244,0.81275463,0.04556638,0.10103926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000293136,0.0003950328,0.044182047,0.00039638535,0.00016008239,0.0020730007,0.024343861,0.0061588436,0.007868309,0.48604405,0.42792797,0.00015728493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007855008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017056914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066783465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038583258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003295339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22341293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7143823841","doi":"10.34382/00005278","title":"A Study on Quality Assurance for Criminal Legal Aid Systems in Common Law Jurisdictions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Quality (philosophy); Quality assurance; Legislation; Delict","score_opus":0.04316212651561169,"score_gpt":0.3158992141415067,"score_spread":0.272737087625895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7143823841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811693,0.0005480667,0.0012832317,0.0022174644,0.000013579762,0.00021415748,0.00011024113,0.000026636357,0.014417239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784243,0.0002362939,0.0007605734,0.00008122107,0.000005985803,0.000030237077,0.000052071435,0.0000045980782,0.0009866098],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98664063,0.0062567787,0.0013420325,0.0007038594,0.0035423052,0.00151449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92196226,0.02665574,0.022818042,0.0037480106,0.02112695,0.0036890514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012567007,0.00011560871,0.00020716661,0.0028576101,0.0027577167,0.004880783,0.0010008104,0.00049110054,0.0027647861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056269623,0.00023707245,0.0003045395,0.004239167,0.0017472627,0.0033601294,0.0016738536,0.00092638173,0.00023364923],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001562954,0.00077730016,0.71411645,0.0005830296,0.00005273574,0.00058264047,0.118791215,0.0009963171,0.0012388286,0.017255379,0.0035915696,0.14185822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017959015,0.0006230666,0.7988941,0.00043164782,0.000052618976,0.0004821748,0.16473113,0.0020353436,0.0009395463,0.0011802097,0.030567497,0.000044633383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032094076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02917678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032094076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010026114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010844785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07274485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7147102892","doi":"10.70675/28e77614zd3a0z4931za2aczcd46f7a5bf7d","title":"Le principe de proportionnalité à l'aune des technologies de l'information : pour une modernisation en modération de la procédure civile","year":2018,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Identity (music); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.010121487395277677,"score_gpt":0.2606101995794294,"score_spread":0.2504887121841517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7147102892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026448231,0.012211922,0.26937556,0.12390244,0.0018220362,0.00033516213,0.00039973806,0.0005634329,0.56494147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7657917,0.010677338,0.08233672,0.020563636,0.0016980168,0.0010146721,0.0003297804,0.0005673428,0.117020845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97107893,0.012486034,0.0011770629,0.0042690644,0.009327897,0.0016610886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697971,0.013232287,0.0024274164,0.0063373307,0.0070890817,0.001116691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018711815,0.00084494427,0.0005904864,0.0026929022,0.0070297895,0.016860344,0.002761181,0.0067357286,0.010344444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03957852,0.0007035422,0.0009989343,0.0023152153,0.038779113,0.01692455,0.0068414123,0.010871519,0.002989487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068295053,0.0000051153656,0.00018577634,0.000053872693,0.000004744667,0.000016732663,0.0019301323,0.00015072647,0.0001283952,0.9901065,0.0019790535,0.005432208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025632977,0.000069785514,0.0015112212,0.00083145587,0.000035083438,0.00021224063,0.0025305827,0.0013146983,0.0015961662,0.51704943,0.47474912,0.00007471999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028152445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021519851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028152445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013708104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021400603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09945977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7147312221","doi":"10.70675/82a98f25zb65fz48f4z992dz3f05cdd6ea41","title":"L'action privée en droit des pratiques anticoncurrentielles : pour un recours effectif des entreprises et des consommateurs en droits français et canadien","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Concurrence; Enforcement; Law enforcement; Civil procedure","score_opus":0.016092953957815508,"score_gpt":0.2815231287106731,"score_spread":0.2654301747528576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7147312221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24954729,0.037115492,0.004899708,0.28847578,0.0016597303,0.00007635662,0.00024939812,0.00006248667,0.41791373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8793486,0.009341733,0.0012852907,0.01829746,0.00030837476,0.00006398916,0.00009230418,0.00004913898,0.09121314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886154,0.0045373286,0.00018105305,0.0007940917,0.002639891,0.0032322959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880526,0.0045420537,0.001224303,0.0007796398,0.0033681889,0.0020332567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071105673,0.00056218717,0.0004696406,0.0012126333,0.012589121,0.0092533175,0.001180851,0.0054811016,0.0146133695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0121661695,0.00033306755,0.0007374518,0.0016756473,0.014396672,0.0051418887,0.0043186126,0.0058971373,0.0013119496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022515445,0.00020861285,0.030997736,0.00040388686,0.00007438158,0.00075991085,0.08408077,0.0008174522,0.00093466387,0.72133344,0.04437175,0.11579223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007220161,0.00022603506,0.061525553,0.0017431747,0.00010851497,0.0004326195,0.10141381,0.0007805602,0.0010628158,0.047051847,0.78542477,0.00015827974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.673349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7494486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32665098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03190845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053035945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6571494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7147707594","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v28i1.2858","title":"Groepsgedingvoering — die voorstel van die Suid-Afrikaanse Regskommissie vir die sertifisering van ’n groepsgeding","year":2003,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promulgation; Commission; Legislation; Certification; Class (philosophy); Class action","score_opus":0.03937184074087862,"score_gpt":0.2945533595771468,"score_spread":0.25518151883626816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7147707594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049945537,0.029346505,0.01383605,0.08796289,0.0056584235,0.0001390667,0.00047667316,0.00021071445,0.81242406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45176387,0.016235018,0.008405498,0.008989504,0.0009274282,0.000109145156,0.00045061103,0.0003886361,0.51273024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971693,0.0006914917,0.00015773707,0.00029170065,0.0010642579,0.0006255554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989203,0.0004945202,0.00012461722,0.00012120154,0.00018443156,0.0001549912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021625124,0.000371189,0.00026271405,0.00068703154,0.0045622787,0.0062680906,0.00090796704,0.0029113144,0.035341382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061673606,0.00035552232,0.00022848032,0.0008178646,0.0029488995,0.003753145,0.0037090338,0.003978697,0.005131077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053391603,0.000047063764,0.0013381972,0.00018155872,0.000012315664,0.0006181447,0.012624662,0.00058988674,0.00095266785,0.70231235,0.14972006,0.13154985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035760002,0.000008464993,0.00074453955,0.00011258943,0.0000026525786,0.00013040726,0.002023838,0.000076943,0.0004189509,0.012006648,0.9844588,0.000012678384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06678871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08378776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06678871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003981708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008878087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13279992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161791003","doi":"10.82308/11480","title":"Transplanting class actions: A comparative analysis of the potential of canadian class actions for the Kuwaiti legal system","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Adjudication; Class (philosophy); Legal research; Economic Justice; Action (physics); Res judicata; Procedural justice; Core (optical fiber)","score_opus":0.03939792780986133,"score_gpt":0.27841744190216816,"score_spread":0.23901951409230682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161791003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8705456,0.0011700145,0.000660836,0.0033701577,0.000052413787,0.00014355757,0.00021985295,0.000016061264,0.123821564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99508494,0.0006226419,0.0003975229,0.00028740783,0.000005595598,0.000026128668,0.000081998136,0.000010327767,0.0034834386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99349034,0.0008408398,0.00014292265,0.00046050415,0.0023512503,0.0027141299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99254143,0.0017254058,0.0007312422,0.0004147645,0.0035075112,0.0010796711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044618216,0.00040981098,0.0006478087,0.0051386897,0.028445479,0.007945947,0.0026744506,0.001971721,0.005867052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01294468,0.0003188833,0.0005542493,0.007880721,0.012244879,0.0035461967,0.0041694306,0.002798246,0.00021507774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003469539,0.00023607278,0.10300842,0.0004213402,0.00013495145,0.0025827242,0.34362987,0.0019443586,0.0020405336,0.45893958,0.012270502,0.07444463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004747937,0.00011546254,0.3381123,0.00062560657,0.0002632152,0.00044222124,0.5181733,0.004029609,0.0008019468,0.008593142,0.12853123,0.00026454884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99021626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99648017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1880577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1880577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13410452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94173795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161992227","doi":"10.82308/39456","title":"L'arbitrage des différends en droit de la consommation : une nouvelle approche","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Dispute resolution; Legislature; Alternative dispute resolution; Control (management); Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.008070645705886531,"score_gpt":0.23871168740188523,"score_spread":0.2306410416959987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161992227","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031595625,0.02407642,0.43992436,0.1334804,0.004241317,0.0005611873,0.00039573025,0.0008580959,0.36486685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6084701,0.00966842,0.14030069,0.015982734,0.0022081723,0.0005034798,0.00023925223,0.000488122,0.22213899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728405,0.0075063305,0.0010145265,0.0034746658,0.012916379,0.0022476208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98854584,0.0036131558,0.0005600781,0.0018764167,0.004928215,0.0004762414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01886948,0.0013344021,0.0016135742,0.0021882318,0.007386728,0.015331839,0.006169913,0.010694248,0.016856937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026764762,0.00068898685,0.0020405098,0.0020005885,0.014800605,0.010580578,0.004674542,0.008486503,0.0037978115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097061136,0.000030761992,0.00055216154,0.00011354924,0.000038718867,0.00025744125,0.0014204552,0.0022122648,0.00096756057,0.9117026,0.021315446,0.06129197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019650137,0.00007781595,0.0014134274,0.00063970085,0.00009237393,0.0007201839,0.001312708,0.016654907,0.0033391854,0.26221445,0.71314985,0.0001889434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20902283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18338874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20902283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016623255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0152039565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41561234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162166201","doi":"","title":"Contractualisation of Civil Litigation in Germany:A Development Towards More Party Autonomy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications)","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Procedural law; Procedural justice; Autonomy; Jurisdiction; Civil procedure; Statutory law; Interim; Situated","score_opus":0.04280426418039953,"score_gpt":0.28949678623469033,"score_spread":0.2466925220542908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162166201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20928712,0.03614965,0.049709015,0.038413838,0.001724618,0.00016682978,0.00034778504,0.0004170186,0.6637842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87550896,0.010912204,0.010973389,0.0023864957,0.0004135818,0.00009029395,0.00023899849,0.0000762106,0.09939976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957973,0.001426036,0.0002580739,0.00039546078,0.0011747301,0.00094840955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987884,0.0005490727,0.00017617669,0.000190362,0.00009679682,0.00019914108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004135374,0.00041877574,0.0003418853,0.002002502,0.0022143312,0.007232366,0.0016775778,0.0031836713,0.0034978213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036470213,0.00043348063,0.00050247007,0.0035287314,0.005338575,0.0051760064,0.004937093,0.0021883838,0.0008200231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007920415,0.000019048293,0.00036105586,0.00004091209,0.0000044034628,0.00011458923,0.0024232378,0.0010823013,0.00017146964,0.95910513,0.0054274513,0.031242374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029672148,0.000062006715,0.008902489,0.0004418823,0.000021597758,0.0004918675,0.0039406386,0.005537804,0.0013109851,0.2616679,0.71751887,0.000074284966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026111756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022385648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026111756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01146114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009147537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083156765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164925153","doi":"10.1080/17153379.2022.12558115","title":"Rights Claiming in South Korea.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.013759097288690635,"score_gpt":0.20733670601183082,"score_spread":0.1935776087231402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164925153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71068627,0.002030755,0.00080512743,0.017770603,0.00024260317,0.00015054124,0.0002797551,0.000024063842,0.26801026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94431627,0.0007302961,0.00023852669,0.0027674355,0.000030401736,0.000037940827,0.000082295934,0.00001078035,0.051786058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986883,0.00031344168,0.000085874664,0.00014694723,0.00012507245,0.00064042734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984792,0.0005052525,0.00031408455,0.00013473934,0.00017823356,0.00038849012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017900151,0.00016611924,0.00016074585,0.0005972642,0.0052245227,0.00343981,0.00068988703,0.0022591387,0.017082796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002921499,0.00021365112,0.00023948174,0.0009209627,0.0022375975,0.0036641,0.0050538494,0.002993314,0.0011781242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038948286,0.00045616785,0.06838209,0.00051938003,0.0000582994,0.017083833,0.073499136,0.00053023867,0.0025866895,0.66664773,0.0475881,0.12225892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012666294,0.0002241792,0.10914164,0.00067345885,0.00011046885,0.005763933,0.18669175,0.0012791466,0.002780637,0.05573963,0.6373735,0.00009500585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028569723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052096616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028569723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024361287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006502871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057147622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164947451","doi":"10.47348/slr/2025/i3a5","title":"Reflecting on 30 Years of Class Action in South Africa: A People Inured to Hardship but Not to Collective Redress?","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Redress; Disadvantaged; Certification; Legislation; Action (physics); Collective action","score_opus":0.09145964438335487,"score_gpt":0.3575166583812133,"score_spread":0.26605701399785847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164947451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6403443,0.008762761,0.0007042091,0.31413564,0.003156052,0.000059711125,0.00007031397,0.000034072767,0.03273294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9159471,0.006171237,0.00053342176,0.050303727,0.00045065873,0.000065297165,0.00002907376,0.00005178778,0.026447637],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542713,0.0013409996,0.00019329031,0.0003640065,0.0005769339,0.0020976414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942766,0.0010944293,0.0014455597,0.0002632236,0.00037168368,0.0025484723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004763148,0.00048048014,0.0007139297,0.001433064,0.02921066,0.0077811293,0.0014987892,0.0057013836,0.012117047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007351869,0.000785831,0.0005748305,0.0011183172,0.016047651,0.013493686,0.011239181,0.009845997,0.001259005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028550168,0.00008394443,0.010309895,0.00017651469,0.00001419845,0.0037569692,0.9158144,0.000025072928,0.0013038267,0.020731697,0.020467434,0.027287502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045295646,0.000042887616,0.0046038292,0.00027810223,0.0000061984533,0.001826645,0.86886084,0.000020279627,0.00017173313,0.0026833443,0.12146919,0.00003231731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023672558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043217797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02921066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057893842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008682369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04706955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W824940282","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2566538","title":"Marital Privileged Communication in Canada and the Proposed Victims Bill of Rights Act (Bill C-32): An Amendment to Canada Evidence Act S.4","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Law; Political science; Amendment; Human rights","score_opus":0.014201887057433821,"score_gpt":0.21938436559314853,"score_spread":0.2051824785357147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W824940282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03612782,0.008895884,0.0032615615,0.17571644,0.002384834,0.0008928717,0.0043379352,0.00020674666,0.7681758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4120884,0.0061979964,0.0073792874,0.10950242,0.000855536,0.0007368952,0.0014995992,0.00014239948,0.46159735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97657543,0.002577924,0.00096460193,0.00085199246,0.011526051,0.007503968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815501,0.0054178145,0.00093531614,0.0012241809,0.007887122,0.0029854954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010678519,0.0007365753,0.00087583903,0.001973729,0.017114233,0.009598127,0.0045876056,0.021172209,0.013279129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03170817,0.0013384458,0.0014565387,0.0027612401,0.007566853,0.0025906984,0.0040505216,0.010441445,0.0018433918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001017983,0.00009265853,0.0037448625,0.00013087911,0.000025488607,0.0005559098,0.005846387,0.00047964236,0.00036855313,0.65349424,0.31763119,0.017528487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015948318,0.000079435296,0.02856351,0.00091018446,0.00011831638,0.00029045503,0.0051635266,0.0010181147,0.0009260135,0.032802034,0.92967385,0.00029504194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9854473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06827102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06827102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3207195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4953432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W8581827","doi":"10.1017/s0731126500009483","title":"Solving the Problems of Finding Law on the Web: World Law and DIAL","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dial; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.020475087159766807,"score_gpt":0.24426534467200758,"score_spread":0.22379025751224077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W8581827","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.091648355,0.017677315,0.4841848,0.21166322,0.0013431753,0.00048604616,0.0016941461,0.0023438688,0.18895912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6846682,0.009745426,0.26780158,0.007773592,0.00093629543,0.00044133904,0.0016732541,0.0009674433,0.025992813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9756497,0.015041144,0.0017042905,0.002316856,0.0043388056,0.00094926654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8764889,0.08828352,0.004244834,0.017432902,0.0102618905,0.0032879992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03255248,0.0005248752,0.0012712302,0.00955226,0.010544259,0.027645413,0.0035877577,0.006251906,0.015022274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.119160846,0.0011201964,0.00092621276,0.008898489,0.015673276,0.07501773,0.01753236,0.00801257,0.0029837294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006350026,0.00012801375,0.0039684013,0.00024514768,0.000037077614,0.0003814346,0.0074501433,0.0024582779,0.00026847128,0.7694269,0.030374821,0.18519774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001462604,0.000012241556,0.00055926066,0.00040294867,0.000015727346,0.00044751563,0.00999765,0.009354445,0.00044218593,0.91491354,0.06380212,0.000037695754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010566958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008326627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03255248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055604037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055758785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17215604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W944740972","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1282","title":"Harmonizing Unfair Commercial Practices Law: The Cultural and Social Dimensions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harmonization; Typology; Rationality; Empirical research; Criticism; Marketing; Business; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0763837442277169,"score_gpt":0.28472471111338105,"score_spread":0.20834096688566414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W944740972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55471,0.0028693564,0.029554635,0.017928448,0.0001843156,0.000107087726,0.000016498618,0.000041182066,0.3945885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99646264,0.00024041292,0.0010005195,0.0007434584,0.00003703866,0.000017925457,0.0000033935905,0.000006846865,0.0014878281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749347,0.014044896,0.0010550114,0.001773374,0.0062348642,0.0019571907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97234994,0.015486683,0.004652385,0.0045480593,0.0023201704,0.00064280437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018525736,0.00028182816,0.00044624155,0.0015383644,0.00922455,0.012736083,0.0015642011,0.0039580963,0.0015730513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032853223,0.00032812724,0.0004124691,0.001576546,0.08022191,0.0071637724,0.008948022,0.00600033,0.000150881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012775526,0.000031911703,0.0028945943,0.000028580596,0.000014744602,0.00035527308,0.060234826,0.00028933233,0.00019757112,0.9203329,0.0004935104,0.015114033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028896597,0.00014098376,0.014968965,0.0005785683,0.00005393516,0.0013488557,0.15439372,0.0017191407,0.0020177618,0.70853055,0.11610331,0.00011530499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063666916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051619466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018525736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005055504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044228104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0979746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W972966411","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1370","title":"The Federal Court of Australia's Power to Terminate Properly Instituted Class Actions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Federal court; Action (physics); Law; Authorization; Political science; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer security; Supreme court; Computer science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.03568943591522623,"score_gpt":0.27675675330811284,"score_spread":0.24106731739288662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W972966411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11743019,0.0030010117,0.012314313,0.042262483,0.0011836343,0.0004652614,0.00020399134,0.00026596375,0.8228731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8389432,0.0011216277,0.007429519,0.020630352,0.0005011046,0.00031967086,0.000072192684,0.00006701042,0.1309153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9654944,0.005121338,0.0024870378,0.0035075229,0.015683398,0.0077063097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95787054,0.02106019,0.0028450529,0.004827866,0.010537751,0.0028585263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021908889,0.0003304834,0.00074584415,0.002205198,0.01795943,0.0155792795,0.003038358,0.015411088,0.0059557194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054335065,0.0011094761,0.00085993775,0.0015537292,0.011539169,0.005417223,0.005879784,0.016520374,0.00089645357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042298776,0.000049767186,0.0018347898,0.000060402584,0.00001573377,0.00032296628,0.0060006077,0.00027617352,0.001240862,0.9473887,0.021154827,0.021612724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016248361,0.00031507463,0.022322958,0.0009238334,0.00025168978,0.00079804694,0.005174354,0.0041173403,0.003982455,0.15324886,0.8082401,0.00046268466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38185835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53191566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38185835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02140546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049945433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7592714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}