{"meta":{"query_hash":"d3232f0dd9bd","filters":{"topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics"},"cohort_total":807,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":807,"exported":807,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d3232f0dd9bd","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Epistemology%2C+Ethics%2C+and+Metaphysics"},"results":[{"id":"W10905981","doi":"10.1016/b0-08-044854-2/01122-6","title":"Epistemology and Language","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Skepticism; Epistemology; Relation (database); Semantics (computer science); Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.03029471805517239,"score_gpt":0.2450336050754534,"score_spread":0.21473888702028102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W10905981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017816433,0.09125733,0.014372635,0.012032636,0.0012967342,0.000036519552,0.0005266723,0.00030212622,0.8783936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18983996,0.085763305,0.027045049,0.0068681426,0.0036946249,0.0005593378,0.002274616,0.0012342642,0.6827208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988568,0.0005215244,0.000080338265,0.0002471576,0.00022119006,0.00007294269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998611,0.00090834283,0.00006945109,0.00019986554,0.00014843527,0.00006293752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014790631,0.0012749169,0.0016167985,0.002027586,0.0022708813,0.009783913,0.0013044227,0.0028715571,0.0518555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034727675,0.0008470139,0.0004694535,0.0031288124,0.009346464,0.00958696,0.0028869978,0.005072911,0.016303433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013307983,0.000018948544,0.00017234519,0.00020933832,0.000010351939,0.00006813749,0.0017191771,0.00013488586,0.00017722195,0.9052425,0.04679048,0.04544326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015690784,0.000010903477,0.0003090745,0.00062605913,0.0000101292535,0.00016947534,0.0009900284,0.00024953825,0.000101335296,0.57385814,0.42365146,0.0000082828265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047478266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005327503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0518555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029633443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002228658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17347395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W119078039","doi":"10.1023/a:1016307111148","title":"Externalism, Memory, and Self-Knowledge","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Externalism; Epistemology; Doctrine; Philosophy; Ontology; Subject (documents); Individuation; Inclusion (mineral); Value (mathematics); A priori and a posteriori; Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Theology; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06696832159040311,"score_gpt":0.25196915492412764,"score_spread":0.18500083333372452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W119078039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26586634,0.019956129,0.10071906,0.030334355,0.0004382444,0.000047387573,0.00020537125,0.00014266695,0.58229053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902712,0.001508517,0.0026542267,0.00043070086,0.00013975464,0.000025160383,0.000059568396,0.000022738835,0.0048880894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979632,0.0009983204,0.00014527132,0.00035117508,0.00033608626,0.00020601979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929773,0.0045757783,0.00062576105,0.0011279413,0.0004528096,0.00024040855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002910156,0.0003606562,0.0005959654,0.0018049008,0.0020694751,0.009105468,0.0011826691,0.0022644491,0.0052766716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0086919,0.00023026949,0.00041832245,0.0014331971,0.02628449,0.0128539605,0.0038812067,0.0026353209,0.00037386816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027318514,0.00001939694,0.00046284884,0.000068205256,0.000011135276,0.000049450977,0.004035438,0.00019697563,0.000118015254,0.9867318,0.00040450768,0.007874867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006328537,0.000005191805,0.00018514231,0.000043605396,0.0000049093796,0.00006221513,0.0014361213,0.00019112686,0.0001276927,0.9949084,0.003024232,0.000004992553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001368888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009596303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009105468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015291885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015306263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017652273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W119769438","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6209-284-6_9","title":"Understanding Denial and Delusion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SensePublishers eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Denial; Relation (database); Scope (computer science); Philosophical theory; Philosophical methodology; Work (physics); Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.2115899258376878,"score_gpt":0.23886932054126522,"score_spread":0.02727939470357743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W119769438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0487019,0.016445229,0.03599937,0.07846569,0.0016925926,0.000093196664,0.00009108491,0.00019736715,0.81831354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565446,0.0043010404,0.0036203142,0.0058155255,0.00043523224,0.00011129153,0.000081397004,0.00013970326,0.028950902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99264354,0.0048482353,0.00017235818,0.0006885646,0.0008287058,0.0008185779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941695,0.0037395528,0.0005238093,0.00066557445,0.0005191003,0.0003825017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071261907,0.0006595794,0.0006266079,0.0018166241,0.0077444958,0.012890071,0.0022608838,0.0041041095,0.009064905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012735676,0.00044761485,0.00063949305,0.0013408911,0.060120862,0.025056219,0.009928583,0.009194988,0.0013209084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008170819,0.0000051568945,0.00016976676,0.000024064137,0.0000022402205,0.0000701471,0.027895464,0.00004279746,0.00003033165,0.9666216,0.0019582375,0.0031718772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007895906,0.000010387547,0.00019494168,0.000156893,0.0000037787509,0.00022816478,0.027205193,0.00026947373,0.000078961355,0.8895986,0.08223427,0.000011400506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034436765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002714282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012890071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006922793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002563597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050228655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W141175123","doi":"10.1023/a:1007837321284","title":"Slippery Slopes and Collapsing Taboos","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.033965186975042326,"score_gpt":0.25552911910522963,"score_spread":0.2215639321301873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W141175123","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120493084,0.004281662,0.42561245,0.030853134,0.0014078775,0.00029767046,0.00039811723,0.0008071425,0.41584885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9291552,0.0008903116,0.04815567,0.0010918817,0.00029711786,0.00020462564,0.00016316916,0.0006414496,0.019400649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776058,0.013400985,0.001044089,0.0022525194,0.003970863,0.0017256704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9491571,0.029319683,0.0027139771,0.0115562575,0.00571809,0.0015349238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01847293,0.00086253835,0.001722072,0.0073458613,0.010253362,0.01674169,0.0027641421,0.005212779,0.025062615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10893917,0.0011479629,0.0012033787,0.005607146,0.040437285,0.027105238,0.015256558,0.0074088746,0.003194201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026798261,0.000008660791,0.0003712896,0.00003367922,0.000010743923,0.00011073714,0.00877508,0.00029891645,0.00007398637,0.98062414,0.0017141002,0.0079519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010829645,0.000005527408,0.00012760944,0.00011162109,0.000008938084,0.00006747743,0.0048591886,0.0009930178,0.00010018283,0.9802941,0.013411418,0.000010251396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023994776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002764677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025062615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029700072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033481473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09769535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1440985897","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511619311.001","title":"Introduction","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Balance (ability); Adversary; The Internet; Political science; Sociology; Positive economics; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Computer security; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07158971641135597,"score_gpt":0.2228153060685934,"score_spread":0.15122558965723742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1440985897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009971634,0.0068409154,0.005023448,0.012730656,0.007524125,0.00013893563,0.002213093,0.0006516389,0.9638801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009175386,0.004574176,0.0026073363,0.0049566342,0.0019972723,0.00012972637,0.002061609,0.00036206786,0.9741358],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882406,0.00018611008,0.00006205382,0.00034707176,0.00043830465,0.0001424364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987882,0.00021468366,0.00006768832,0.00021868944,0.000474322,0.0002364856],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009681051,0.0008285109,0.00067333714,0.0013279693,0.002525105,0.0069726915,0.0020928623,0.003520843,0.4386065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034455569,0.00033941554,0.000684381,0.0016571522,0.0014612977,0.005996744,0.003758792,0.0030290703,0.27568412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044654716,0.000045757286,0.0004127679,0.0002775914,0.0000057441034,0.00015459619,0.00084332953,0.00015886888,0.00038161583,0.1631499,0.7032776,0.1312476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018809967,0.000007706688,0.00013431409,0.00008277345,0.000001054017,0.000067127105,0.00013704055,0.000023448627,0.00004966722,0.006309943,0.9931821,0.0000030991253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029761104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032929357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4386065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027515707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002385746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8007597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1458770969","doi":"10.1111/mila.12112","title":"Full‐On Stating","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind & Language","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Proposition; Sentence; Grice; Phrase; Epistemology; Function (biology); Linguistics; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Pragmatics","score_opus":0.04854387629254079,"score_gpt":0.2784761335739991,"score_spread":0.2299322572814583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1458770969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06837451,0.0017420937,0.07093445,0.01522788,0.0019056711,0.00015655326,0.0009802418,0.0009525452,0.83972615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9010167,0.0010412512,0.011370978,0.0035736647,0.0004782765,0.000097803575,0.0011726288,0.00043833692,0.08081033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956371,0.0024407466,0.00026377916,0.00048952684,0.00071831624,0.00045059668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938259,0.0021963322,0.00044585692,0.0015147667,0.0017399612,0.000277209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032278097,0.00079018815,0.00044025865,0.00076154206,0.002244466,0.0041691475,0.0011686172,0.0018506399,0.025936075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008806255,0.00040011777,0.0006387237,0.00090013235,0.0053533795,0.007672465,0.0038665908,0.0035756768,0.0045129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009025056,0.000024020166,0.00086406944,0.00019180622,0.00001586277,0.00016097713,0.0106072,0.00019668914,0.0021726494,0.93787783,0.013389441,0.03440919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022307884,0.00014237297,0.0023848126,0.0006234781,0.00010790018,0.00070206594,0.012173573,0.0019717116,0.008217715,0.3929572,0.580591,0.00010578465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031641359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027761937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025936075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023807792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016481047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08676481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W146218034","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195309799.013.0001","title":"Introduction: Philosophy and Cognitive Science","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Explication; Philosophy of science; Cognition; Epistemology; Philosophy of mind; Cognitive science; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.055016054628995684,"score_gpt":0.22555136654571836,"score_spread":0.17053531191672266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W146218034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010511994,0.36187983,0.020238433,0.050557867,0.015750235,0.0001268433,0.000996284,0.0005052409,0.5488941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04011275,0.38902107,0.027337918,0.034238234,0.031888094,0.0006360837,0.002159863,0.00072725874,0.4738788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891937,0.00030692152,0.000068440095,0.00017250363,0.00044739747,0.000085323685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825996,0.0011045013,0.000075852826,0.00010964199,0.0003123913,0.00013767644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011543388,0.0011884866,0.0010195004,0.0019631127,0.0019672792,0.0050452296,0.001383962,0.0030517147,0.060768176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029054764,0.00050261547,0.000680494,0.002970414,0.004225008,0.006603296,0.0022580386,0.0070992173,0.024586612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002081957,0.000037850314,0.00020965068,0.0008966965,0.000016144402,0.000098526856,0.0017431033,0.00034599093,0.0002209992,0.47888103,0.42215765,0.09537152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032309824,0.000007037899,0.00015816341,0.0004911641,0.0000022330112,0.00011551601,0.00016778063,0.000062365085,0.000019649608,0.13887759,0.86008865,0.0000066328466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020741206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001856814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060768176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026408727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002926814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2032898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482119929","doi":"10.1002/9781444344431.ch88","title":"Searle and the Chinese Room Argument","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); State (computer science); Citation; Philosophy; Classics; Art; Law; Political science; Medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03473904598967871,"score_gpt":0.2454509603869263,"score_spread":0.21071191439724757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482119929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014778638,0.0024660302,0.0030373721,0.036845423,0.00014911381,0.000018819817,0.000077678975,0.000035214278,0.94259167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.782957,0.0018150994,0.00213667,0.0086948965,0.00036502263,0.000107340406,0.00006811178,0.00015480578,0.20370093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971812,0.0015542064,0.000064322456,0.0003560847,0.00047484817,0.00036936312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963924,0.002411842,0.00013691485,0.0005142042,0.0003492296,0.00019540775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033668908,0.0006154088,0.00072755,0.0018676327,0.009802159,0.008528982,0.0014199357,0.005672371,0.03494217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0083145285,0.0003406954,0.00070813415,0.002424581,0.029569143,0.0102196215,0.004252521,0.005352971,0.0023276906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008114924,0.0000040341597,0.00004197958,0.000010902873,0.0000019432757,0.000019349105,0.0008401535,0.000049667622,0.00000982631,0.99400324,0.003720689,0.0012901053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034208253,0.0000060021125,0.00033743487,0.000096426214,0.000010102889,0.00003808644,0.002472232,0.0003321732,0.00017469843,0.9064611,0.09002457,0.000012974098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029737007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036173984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03494217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008370917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007434211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11689323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484922772","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2010.01371.x","title":"ASSERTION AND CAPITULATION","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Utterance; Coercion (linguistics); Ideology; Speech act; Context (archaeology); sort; Resistance (ecology); Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science; History; Arithmetic; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03470307404019345,"score_gpt":0.25083842446667476,"score_spread":0.2161353504264813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484922772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063823365,0.0053264857,0.12424369,0.028844468,0.0021943254,0.00012371558,0.00018372877,0.00039558267,0.7748647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755307,0.00080129976,0.0071314084,0.0014363669,0.0007398707,0.00009586036,0.000069180875,0.0001131251,0.014082212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903244,0.006297751,0.0005292007,0.0009966162,0.0012518495,0.0006002007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866605,0.007387285,0.0012466876,0.00202637,0.0022811617,0.0003981242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007384907,0.0005372428,0.0004989511,0.0011601229,0.003531677,0.0057965084,0.0019498921,0.0027951954,0.0077166534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016813623,0.00037326364,0.00044254615,0.000939217,0.022062276,0.009421663,0.0057190508,0.004997735,0.0013588539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017956336,0.000004781792,0.00007055196,0.00004260335,0.0000034726027,0.00007517361,0.0047381865,0.00006923574,0.00020445476,0.99084127,0.0012179449,0.0027145138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025217732,0.000045740122,0.0002802494,0.00030727405,0.000025650274,0.00030373028,0.0050531253,0.0014378652,0.0020096723,0.8949353,0.09553908,0.00003702117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015027283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008002723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077166534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021744715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014684554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039055586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486871773","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3893","title":"Govier’s Distinguishing A Priori from Inductive Arguments by Analogy: Implications for a General Theory of Ground Adequacy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Warrant; Ceteris paribus; A priori and a posteriori; Intuition; Epistemology; Property (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Inductive reasoning; Defeasible estate; Defeasible reasoning; Mathematics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.08940304955744048,"score_gpt":0.29413801357619,"score_spread":0.20473496401874952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486871773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061724786,0.004900347,0.3764958,0.12219536,0.0015773696,0.00024865338,0.00032059476,0.0004782986,0.43205884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8266663,0.0015595859,0.13296348,0.012518886,0.001131228,0.00041538398,0.00015005881,0.00023072993,0.02436443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946719,0.0028513644,0.00020992356,0.00094741,0.00094869925,0.00037076138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99141663,0.006156391,0.00041906437,0.0009122205,0.0007586339,0.00033702355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070350976,0.0008559781,0.0010301517,0.0035220643,0.003830964,0.0072111534,0.0027845427,0.008356517,0.00605454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020447474,0.00058640086,0.0017162282,0.0022502546,0.020749746,0.01294844,0.004502552,0.005576336,0.0008918475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013763045,0.0000068563118,0.000083656756,0.000019005376,0.0000040192135,0.000042404805,0.00059663533,0.00018229881,0.0000478768,0.9958905,0.0013023395,0.0018106363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012872668,0.000008700362,0.00013519167,0.000036011374,0.0000066662133,0.00005164672,0.0001531994,0.0006761148,0.00008381204,0.9885311,0.010294803,0.000009944514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003104631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037002482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008356517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042894236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021445488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037205577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489834304","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.431","title":"Three Naturalistic Accounts of the Epistemology of Argument","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Naturalism; Epistemology; Virtue; Philosophy; Naturalistic observation; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08681934052222458,"score_gpt":0.2591182896405862,"score_spread":0.17229894911836163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489834304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0114952,0.004523196,0.44471973,0.04486922,0.0009902635,0.00038570116,0.00037288226,0.00045616442,0.4921876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6025091,0.0049668397,0.33237407,0.0077100922,0.0013132755,0.0031395946,0.00048069382,0.00028455324,0.047221858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841462,0.007816799,0.0007348334,0.0009805626,0.005429109,0.00089246716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98623234,0.008083109,0.0013318325,0.0017923064,0.0016753655,0.00088516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015922545,0.0010780473,0.0010633472,0.008102294,0.0059200753,0.017228069,0.0054221894,0.006730929,0.010047359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019116918,0.0008778124,0.0021259654,0.0045829765,0.04114095,0.014471242,0.0077985614,0.0060166963,0.001689885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032610183,0.0000049083637,0.00003391629,0.000020245083,0.0000015575522,0.000016369471,0.00039860298,0.00006996764,0.000013436695,0.9979627,0.00054003444,0.0009349999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001283249,0.0000062740087,0.0000765641,0.000087033535,0.000003993049,0.00008613531,0.0005144964,0.000901857,0.00007827459,0.9761836,0.02203791,0.000011132369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023424458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030516665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017228069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00876032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004869263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084207475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493333246","doi":"10.1111/meta.12044","title":"Getting Luck Properly Under Control","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Attribution; Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Analogy; Value (mathematics); Control (management); Positive economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Epistemology; Computer science; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0565495966401459,"score_gpt":0.24089496213491396,"score_spread":0.18434536549476804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493333246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14516912,0.0031199676,0.15414181,0.048599932,0.00067942403,0.000107467895,0.00024928767,0.00036871713,0.6475643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874107,0.00034041255,0.0025276963,0.0011891361,0.00010996908,0.000035769484,0.00002926696,0.00007532986,0.0082817385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936811,0.0032211354,0.00022561343,0.0009043151,0.0011190206,0.00084875163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99168956,0.0029448161,0.0012033983,0.0020774612,0.001391245,0.0006935558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007032876,0.00063226465,0.00061094365,0.0014042673,0.0025018728,0.008544052,0.0010632408,0.002574703,0.008446449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017540658,0.00032427014,0.0005882476,0.000847412,0.03156017,0.0095634805,0.004726758,0.0040647835,0.0009871329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024118955,0.000014075976,0.0012439267,0.00003533362,0.000019037532,0.000079591,0.0017966257,0.0014095241,0.00014538519,0.9884294,0.0010814728,0.005721533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009116468,0.000019014637,0.00092295976,0.00007280586,0.00001133316,0.000040770927,0.0007001405,0.0015125875,0.00024248677,0.9846831,0.011769067,0.00001670504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036892213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018758712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008544052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054869894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003565244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039811134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494846022","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2012.01446.x","title":"Contextualism and the Knowledge Norms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Epistemology; Assertion; Normative; Norm (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.061458039001556795,"score_gpt":0.2717297105392614,"score_spread":0.21027167153770462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494846022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0809823,0.006326211,0.22950312,0.07924055,0.00090689986,0.00013513457,0.00020110793,0.00021103767,0.60249364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810363,0.0007708407,0.0120892385,0.001215488,0.00038508492,0.00015582678,0.000037475544,0.000040667102,0.0042689983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800805,0.01192914,0.0009363468,0.0022330533,0.0040529803,0.00076804304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768811,0.014423575,0.0016973151,0.0028934241,0.0032123644,0.00089223194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01427939,0.00045130376,0.00067369465,0.0020091515,0.0040305383,0.0077484394,0.0015588506,0.0030055873,0.0027945044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020806456,0.00048035078,0.00046438852,0.0015604448,0.051543012,0.010224494,0.0061338698,0.004525806,0.0003597037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001821437,0.0000017055751,0.00002501842,0.000007696972,9.826497e-7,0.0000065410254,0.00045085218,0.000077618875,0.000014956672,0.9986243,0.0001279237,0.0006606246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004138519,0.000002394004,0.0000472776,0.000023171142,0.0000017095605,0.000007611794,0.00024989515,0.00024620935,0.000044811037,0.9949116,0.004458412,0.0000028516095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041380296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024210473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01427939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055846795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052936957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075517535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496680931","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511807039.002","title":"ARGUMENTS AND DIALOGUES","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"History; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06642981920992914,"score_gpt":0.21131934346891162,"score_spread":0.1448895242589825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496680931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046684616,0.019420987,0.065070935,0.025273604,0.0016429169,0.00023076609,0.00017152532,0.0002772425,0.88324344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5841375,0.016987838,0.10289345,0.009609526,0.002299579,0.0019877004,0.00075447117,0.0009717127,0.28035817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98063433,0.014183183,0.00058103533,0.0013889355,0.002400496,0.00081215013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989253,0.008281072,0.00053873676,0.00071835547,0.0007761192,0.00043285912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012473695,0.0015401425,0.0011480115,0.0038257316,0.008307752,0.019400802,0.0026382704,0.008290458,0.017004237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021054013,0.0007731716,0.00083552685,0.0031921766,0.034090456,0.023089038,0.009468524,0.007904396,0.0040614796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043293603,0.000003557572,0.000012058801,0.00004426408,0.0000017647338,0.00003598301,0.0042798305,0.000056311143,0.000030130119,0.9904107,0.0026414662,0.0024795872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000116220035,0.0000069925914,0.0000347513,0.00028289156,0.000003082004,0.000080666236,0.0026732457,0.00027506237,0.00008986662,0.74307704,0.25345507,0.000009651855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014766381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012932984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019400802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009351843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003351578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067852736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507824196","doi":"10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00243.x","title":"Virtue Epistemology and the ‘Epistemic Fitness’ of Democracy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemic virtue; Epistemology; Virtue; Normative; Democracy; Social epistemology; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12595829196741012,"score_gpt":0.35493702633302304,"score_spread":0.22897873436561292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507824196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09431121,0.0086064115,0.10371074,0.039971463,0.0005141826,0.00006755958,0.00004574969,0.00007005997,0.7527027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884636,0.0010017575,0.005619645,0.00079834706,0.0002185911,0.000052845193,0.000014646561,0.0000127106,0.0038178866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98945343,0.0071376236,0.00037075632,0.0007138114,0.0017504399,0.00057395146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798734,0.01433399,0.0016961971,0.0017864332,0.0016243438,0.00068564335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012430667,0.00024061603,0.0006380514,0.0022921753,0.0028901638,0.0061845025,0.00073620403,0.0026836465,0.0038572634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02270436,0.00020608108,0.00043270964,0.0010127852,0.027253706,0.007481785,0.004468376,0.0028195383,0.00042571448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035377068,0.000005568232,0.00022139146,0.00002811371,0.0000035793603,0.000012665765,0.0003403218,0.00010940049,0.000031121894,0.9961914,0.00020923653,0.0028436538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040616255,0.0000067169303,0.00036357224,0.000044411296,0.0000022389092,0.000038495153,0.00027891833,0.00027610137,0.000057148052,0.9941216,0.0048021115,0.000004596126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051995297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064078154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012430667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018919584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022342433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065740466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507974668","doi":"","title":"Gender and Philosophical Intuition (Final Draft)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Philosophical methodology; Epistemology; Philosophical theory; Philosophical analysis; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12091564120388351,"score_gpt":0.2665457676904777,"score_spread":0.1456301264865942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507974668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025974622,0.048459888,0.019284016,0.3744513,0.040172447,0.0004497779,0.006287699,0.0004467915,0.48447338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62235767,0.023898965,0.015518451,0.07882427,0.022460474,0.000766869,0.0038913952,0.00046878343,0.23181322],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984493,0.00076016446,0.000119477634,0.0002349915,0.00035020395,0.0000858402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98414373,0.007829056,0.00062611146,0.00064263114,0.006339479,0.0004189912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004975556,0.00044682983,0.00049773627,0.0009793553,0.0015569942,0.0038008618,0.00057664607,0.0016032578,0.05563159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022410499,0.00035388127,0.00066334795,0.0009018978,0.0028951562,0.0033768145,0.0017274636,0.0033230218,0.009356491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013627643,0.00006948367,0.001423792,0.00091010384,0.00006235644,0.00022083668,0.0053835185,0.0003096282,0.0005221255,0.38681892,0.56153923,0.042603746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061053106,0.000067523644,0.012922578,0.0011305043,0.000053273514,0.00043223688,0.0036091036,0.00034421874,0.00044106762,0.17461789,0.8062656,0.00005498651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054356335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045385375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05563159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031673668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013661087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1861062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1511909973","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00528.x","title":"Unenriched Subsentential Illocutions*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Utterance; Proposition; Situated; Assertion; Sentence; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Contextualism; Reflexivity; Cognitive science; Psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; History","score_opus":0.6866357735320964,"score_gpt":0.3794618017876594,"score_spread":0.30717397174443695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1511909973","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21288745,0.0017206394,0.40621665,0.013417797,0.0017189321,0.00022471954,0.00033231065,0.0014888168,0.36199272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96314615,0.0002472668,0.019603912,0.0009382269,0.00017137772,0.00007465178,0.000094100695,0.00022934929,0.015494858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510443,0.0017204857,0.00037749714,0.0011177108,0.0010636094,0.00061625947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98819506,0.0060897875,0.0009863043,0.0023588329,0.0020644567,0.00030547538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00514015,0.0005952456,0.00044208532,0.0009025821,0.0021641932,0.0036470057,0.0018109108,0.0018132292,0.0072866697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0155412415,0.00044619665,0.0007889929,0.00041614723,0.009733686,0.009062648,0.0046143574,0.0048006293,0.0013511041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042518015,0.000014118097,0.0004049021,0.00008350767,0.000011893347,0.0005369926,0.0062538907,0.00019472413,0.0014166733,0.9817115,0.0012698517,0.008059286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017437367,0.00005984349,0.00069277035,0.000110446614,0.00002959432,0.0006198413,0.00289114,0.002445528,0.007984479,0.93937266,0.04572597,0.000050360457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011132335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012041366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072866697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022215312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011439703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02718407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515361935","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i2.3530","title":"The Ethics of Argumentation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Rationality; Epistemology; Normative; Heuristics; Dialectic; Defeasible estate; Reflective equilibrium; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14280636011229497,"score_gpt":0.32591763813883684,"score_spread":0.18311127802654187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515361935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017486328,0.030373398,0.17641333,0.12632091,0.0021274192,0.00019129418,0.00018608588,0.00019290338,0.64670837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8782177,0.013212191,0.053501695,0.00959184,0.003614055,0.00053565437,0.00015283264,0.00018326454,0.04099079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9634499,0.025686357,0.0015435665,0.002367854,0.005632815,0.0013194102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97624654,0.016464468,0.0015078502,0.0030715382,0.0018827684,0.0008268762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016241483,0.00072361215,0.00082292885,0.0019528563,0.0049572866,0.015128049,0.0014672183,0.007509987,0.004288184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026941905,0.0005563701,0.00073501543,0.0014800958,0.05015127,0.0118903965,0.0055832043,0.006931381,0.0017324993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034003347,0.0000033991284,0.000067439825,0.0000289767,0.0000044641342,0.000019823055,0.0006456675,0.00017008331,0.000036894464,0.99457693,0.0010978671,0.0033450406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042864513,0.000003210603,0.00006017335,0.00006979106,0.0000018642709,0.00003434337,0.00020038817,0.00026222502,0.0000442007,0.96250343,0.036812276,0.0000038343774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013725681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076403166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016241483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052411603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005712233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08589417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518980779","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i4.2964","title":"Attacking Character: Ad Hominem Argument and Virtue Epistemology","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Argument (complex analysis); Possession (linguistics); Virtue; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.04225190225435377,"score_gpt":0.263600631053002,"score_spread":0.22134872879864825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518980779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095716126,0.0044649984,0.10790384,0.09512998,0.0012548268,0.00006591276,0.00006202753,0.00013961585,0.69526273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97676384,0.0004499961,0.0071040303,0.0039907787,0.000566077,0.000070453956,0.000015986674,0.00004275091,0.010996067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99041146,0.006883503,0.00021859157,0.0007571532,0.0011602045,0.0005691379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886154,0.007954891,0.0008423898,0.0010187125,0.0009519754,0.00061665627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009775864,0.00045740703,0.00064017787,0.002160071,0.00467387,0.0072055976,0.0013160688,0.0052673267,0.0062401616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013064205,0.00029028923,0.000651756,0.0009241011,0.04449466,0.011630636,0.0068573575,0.00575839,0.0007508204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007042279,0.000008997802,0.000103546154,0.000015676456,0.0000024546318,0.000044482265,0.0011968417,0.000033510376,0.000034789027,0.9967991,0.00059179513,0.0011617779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001155897,0.0000091994925,0.00013030272,0.000045896813,0.0000031981622,0.00006823588,0.0008668232,0.00040034926,0.00012432682,0.98722386,0.011109128,0.0000070340748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056104164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005747147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009775864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038674725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015896487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051700294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525845722","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i3.4055","title":"Arguments that take Counterconsiderations into Account","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Adversary; Balance (ability); Point (geometry); Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07919431369611842,"score_gpt":0.274950669893693,"score_spread":0.1957563561975746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525845722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07268039,0.0044378177,0.18356219,0.055248138,0.0028414808,0.00042297723,0.00009008264,0.00028324156,0.6804337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94364387,0.0012766428,0.023829972,0.008527615,0.0010391392,0.0004606792,0.00006655084,0.00026954248,0.020885976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9759439,0.011901045,0.0011491288,0.0026135885,0.0065990267,0.0017933302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9637655,0.024531951,0.0035806927,0.0035654798,0.0033633406,0.0011931614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018646147,0.001273628,0.0009810331,0.0034327984,0.0048347847,0.011511649,0.0025186492,0.009131844,0.010861807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056636397,0.0006889406,0.0011713861,0.0015200974,0.022831326,0.023754625,0.012043114,0.009865209,0.0017401378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021626674,0.000023212704,0.00031019803,0.00005431188,0.000021623933,0.00016315246,0.0023745669,0.0000880763,0.00025965765,0.99360985,0.0006763995,0.002397356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035761746,0.000037283386,0.00039149285,0.00021755016,0.000056595094,0.0002640398,0.003799679,0.0005718198,0.001248719,0.9236797,0.06966811,0.000029164405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050136395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007041965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018646147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003481379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029750313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098611474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526910648","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1041","title":"Deep Disagreement, Rational Resolutions, and Critical Thinking","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Epistemology; Key (lock); Philosophy; Point (geometry); Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06903815881425727,"score_gpt":0.296677684418392,"score_spread":0.2276395256041347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526910648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0817032,0.022535656,0.17912947,0.22627833,0.0026230046,0.00026426202,0.00010066066,0.00024775215,0.4871176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96302915,0.0022912326,0.02060546,0.005741248,0.00076435006,0.00020837224,0.000040812578,0.00006904745,0.007250333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747546,0.01765665,0.00072091946,0.0017579128,0.0036549005,0.0014550673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791748,0.015783986,0.0016817764,0.0013111604,0.0014158048,0.0006324942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01895528,0.0008426757,0.000823357,0.003336547,0.008391651,0.012730251,0.0021833656,0.008402225,0.003332818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024937779,0.00055577257,0.0008345414,0.0020182233,0.064792804,0.016561562,0.008352693,0.009633916,0.00052685937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008130141,0.000009044382,0.000059753922,0.000027600267,0.0000065573327,0.000039336042,0.0027722565,0.00024037466,0.00002998739,0.99379224,0.0009930858,0.0020216894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009218529,0.0000020122745,0.00001902555,0.00002445281,0.0000018401643,0.000009050768,0.0005713348,0.0001917063,0.00003200756,0.99494547,0.004190345,0.0000036019499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021717295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013491496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01895528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008662991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037836996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10024625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530082090","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2152","title":"Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Philosophy; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.09082178350827413,"score_gpt":0.2956670442864488,"score_spread":0.20484526077817466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530082090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03855739,0.04257239,0.10316566,0.2385867,0.0021720272,0.00048129584,0.00008622184,0.000104561295,0.5742737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9293072,0.00818599,0.018956224,0.0116981445,0.00093763863,0.00094929576,0.000048975893,0.00011094508,0.029805629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9688793,0.024981825,0.00063583226,0.0009359294,0.0032796708,0.0012873891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97892463,0.017098663,0.00076960307,0.00091083517,0.0018282256,0.00046803354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02127057,0.0007828537,0.0006674487,0.003586977,0.007339438,0.016814861,0.0015546505,0.0041364795,0.003919989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031035468,0.00033026355,0.00051938725,0.003418681,0.061456244,0.015540729,0.0075118113,0.006923422,0.00045666707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044317176,0.0000071637573,0.00003319695,0.000027392804,0.0000015743382,0.000013060594,0.0026571157,0.00008003415,0.000021774604,0.99455583,0.0010894629,0.0015090244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011170422,0.000007071942,0.00006383641,0.00016097048,0.0000023684288,0.000017806486,0.0042646606,0.0003336916,0.00009201012,0.96234167,0.03269976,0.0000049811215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047335285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003838102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02127057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020233387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008217229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14680415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536530691","doi":"10.47925/2011.268","title":"An Optimistic Take on Pessimistic Pedagogy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Illusion; Epistemology; George (robot); Section (typography); Dystopia; Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Law; Psychology; History; Art history; Political science; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.20279042381124626,"score_gpt":0.3499665255824054,"score_spread":0.1471761017711591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536530691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034376673,0.009078583,0.036733825,0.411275,0.003176667,0.0000682561,0.000041008745,0.00031110327,0.50493896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9335284,0.0027220026,0.005798195,0.032191288,0.00088967435,0.00010030877,0.000010532734,0.00016833308,0.024591194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98633426,0.009253653,0.00026984233,0.00076812005,0.002720001,0.0006541348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858686,0.008997998,0.0009697914,0.0010578644,0.0019052351,0.001200556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010229133,0.00064421893,0.00055809785,0.0015210637,0.0048544337,0.009555106,0.0014218553,0.0036102661,0.004595251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023543878,0.00035480602,0.00035824123,0.00068412506,0.04278981,0.008916949,0.008373573,0.011642543,0.0013115685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018437791,0.000021002968,0.00027428076,0.00004127961,0.000005126038,0.00003996964,0.010550774,0.00018864186,0.00013444522,0.9729364,0.008547089,0.0072425324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028775692,0.000042611184,0.00028760204,0.00029868216,0.000008804291,0.000083421175,0.007561319,0.0006947158,0.000577508,0.8690345,0.12135131,0.000030735857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021686389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023733736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010229133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063619246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045033856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054097414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542052916","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i2.541","title":"Investigating the Shared Background Required for Argument: A Critique of Fogelin’s Thesis on Deep Disagreement","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.17176234708785432,"score_gpt":0.3072356358019974,"score_spread":0.1354732887141431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542052916","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07942264,0.008143274,0.15492833,0.4344418,0.0014012915,0.00020666783,0.00016654044,0.00032374827,0.3209658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95148927,0.0010998321,0.020366898,0.019191824,0.0013027429,0.0004065725,0.000063065745,0.00019837299,0.0058813905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9729163,0.015119475,0.00094944687,0.0035595412,0.006009445,0.0014458192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92522675,0.060323697,0.0032118466,0.005428291,0.0040561254,0.0017533427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027749296,0.0008597325,0.0017103041,0.0057854387,0.01158429,0.014709382,0.006121345,0.018668665,0.0043375855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07525462,0.00085854344,0.001521344,0.004513536,0.07356581,0.031248637,0.014190732,0.017049072,0.0010093004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013131094,0.000007434204,0.00006651789,0.000025172169,0.0000068997133,0.00007211393,0.006828893,0.000111761074,0.000039303726,0.9892631,0.0012967763,0.0022688713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026889002,0.00000605758,0.00009731194,0.000083232066,0.0000072414123,0.000045122684,0.0014090785,0.0004881958,0.000085692016,0.9860902,0.011650503,0.0000104725805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004796289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025900614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027749296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012791156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008592116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14675409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546474866","doi":"","title":"Strength and promise","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thirdspace","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics","score_opus":0.0468780013437343,"score_gpt":0.25317013983516196,"score_spread":0.20629213849142766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546474866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009025591,0.010854906,0.023413444,0.3486536,0.0033723197,0.00007167238,0.00018393049,0.00012100258,0.6043035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7809521,0.007142207,0.011489168,0.06477199,0.007479,0.00044696283,0.00020673136,0.00036522234,0.12714647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98620194,0.0066307927,0.0003914767,0.002482248,0.0030549504,0.0012386274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97074777,0.015335257,0.001081722,0.006183773,0.004097418,0.002554017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02273211,0.00090716145,0.0019311329,0.002338136,0.01081294,0.01935379,0.0029209948,0.009282678,0.033018146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049838983,0.00058444013,0.0010421294,0.0014196342,0.05435621,0.03039405,0.0115595,0.018158244,0.006382503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013617187,0.000007687381,0.000092315946,0.00002047403,0.000006440756,0.000015521771,0.00048144933,0.00005179354,0.000021001157,0.9918434,0.004629534,0.0028167262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016916114,0.000009570018,0.00008209487,0.00011809334,0.000007111888,0.00003260408,0.00073655613,0.00015954989,0.000064073065,0.9421871,0.05657779,0.00000870752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041069835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003869233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033018146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073606116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009830575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1202203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549987018","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i2.2142","title":"Toulmin's Model of Argument and the Question of Relativism (J. A. Blair Prize, 2005)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Relativism; Epistemology; Warrant; Philosophy; Field (mathematics); Key (lock); Mathematics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.04672540263891843,"score_gpt":0.26036375560586483,"score_spread":0.2136383529669464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549987018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016639376,0.009988226,0.2958319,0.13200106,0.0023844286,0.00024142824,0.00024824892,0.00023725358,0.5424281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8195982,0.0049616173,0.10826626,0.010874351,0.0028598886,0.0007117773,0.00010874127,0.00021591947,0.052403238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99337983,0.0035062952,0.0002931426,0.00083307386,0.001539311,0.00044839588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99381256,0.0035774924,0.0006940248,0.00074169727,0.0008739613,0.00030029775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010820873,0.00094453944,0.00090293563,0.004824215,0.004428956,0.008438957,0.0026430627,0.007275788,0.0055968473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0115942145,0.00055515283,0.0014708212,0.0033037174,0.034407992,0.013554715,0.0035346365,0.0057587335,0.0011153887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003519073,0.0000024977749,0.000017152728,0.000009851532,0.000001911815,0.0000057847383,0.00016253178,0.00007510746,0.000010488842,0.99819833,0.0008027007,0.00071008806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006129221,0.000004456467,0.000030022446,0.00001587808,0.0000025251857,0.000016233937,0.000036584857,0.00021813475,0.000027130422,0.9885283,0.011111131,0.0000034744758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026136283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022460576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010820873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008942729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036983732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064884305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552040573","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i2.1226","title":"Analogies and Other Minds","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Inference; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0862112021793719,"score_gpt":0.2794089140838773,"score_spread":0.1931977119045054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552040573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086506255,0.0090460945,0.28604686,0.06401579,0.0012399356,0.00015522036,0.00020499348,0.00032617289,0.55245864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95413595,0.0013396873,0.028778307,0.0036728985,0.0006114846,0.00014506576,0.00009113357,0.00007467281,0.01115085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98862225,0.007184146,0.0004001488,0.0016065501,0.0017333236,0.0004535374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854854,0.009777546,0.0010003282,0.002266591,0.001047043,0.00042307551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008220086,0.0004906319,0.000856606,0.0027010234,0.0029672792,0.0056001735,0.0017264049,0.003195024,0.010367482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019905644,0.000338887,0.0011386187,0.001278414,0.025197575,0.013431382,0.005467317,0.0052223047,0.0008841458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000432229,0.0000046437303,0.000060448314,0.000018065552,0.000006087447,0.00002587719,0.00032610743,0.00011159097,0.000030232619,0.99746597,0.00030468445,0.0016419989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063255034,0.0000035545854,0.000064314576,0.000020213407,0.0000029584958,0.000028133773,0.00012055167,0.000267923,0.000038593294,0.9936494,0.0057950094,0.0000028434813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091104076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005934912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010367482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027149583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012379386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04347253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W155548036","doi":"10.7202/1044462ar","title":"An Epistemic Argument in Support of Liberal Neutrality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Argument (complex analysis); Neutrality; Action (physics); Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Harm; Law and economics; Seriousness; Set (abstract data type); Vagueness; Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Computer science; Fuzzy logic","score_opus":0.04925576707159765,"score_gpt":0.2993630143034923,"score_spread":0.2501072472318947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W155548036","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0533232,0.000988385,0.18813981,0.16057447,0.0018005178,0.00015776636,0.00020813942,0.0003632977,0.59444445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94873655,0.0002537701,0.017137252,0.018687252,0.0010366574,0.00020937323,0.00006478013,0.000096291245,0.013778031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848978,0.0075415405,0.00044463063,0.001618872,0.0039619044,0.0015353017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96147096,0.02673168,0.0021256865,0.004309461,0.0036896965,0.0016724804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015390951,0.0005421013,0.0008766079,0.0017377697,0.0037158448,0.0060227113,0.0020827546,0.00779713,0.008330206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046950545,0.0003974047,0.0015482795,0.0008608888,0.024120918,0.009973931,0.008292865,0.010508058,0.0014851813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008478718,0.000008279481,0.000086252134,0.000011519152,0.0000041641574,0.000037976228,0.00017000784,0.00014591857,0.00004560321,0.99822456,0.00062036957,0.00063681847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017721663,0.000008515996,0.00006583605,0.000020096373,0.00000402034,0.000042269538,0.00010861562,0.000811386,0.00011025065,0.991029,0.007775522,0.000006694949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007536425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005937984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015390951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00356058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002715963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0813961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558336695","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2262","title":"Informal Logic: An Overview","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; sort; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy of logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Information retrieval; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.16255535349708566,"score_gpt":0.3147098564452695,"score_spread":0.15215450294818383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558336695","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006493606,0.37090132,0.3232702,0.024239829,0.002034912,0.00018253378,0.0003658193,0.000504712,0.27200708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36566755,0.4558652,0.12599829,0.013873413,0.008059173,0.00078078074,0.00086594623,0.00062231964,0.028267322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942139,0.0029297813,0.0004968457,0.000520634,0.0014502958,0.00038856018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992708,0.0057266415,0.0002907448,0.00046085825,0.0006297696,0.00018387563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006214554,0.0009749333,0.0009825719,0.007831542,0.0031320609,0.007829423,0.0018424751,0.00285736,0.007532786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068690977,0.00069164205,0.0011877115,0.0068567866,0.011128922,0.017800553,0.0038996025,0.0042186696,0.0018962513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104239725,0.000013071224,0.00015462634,0.00046475595,0.000008118035,0.000065713735,0.00064105197,0.00044980593,0.00006925692,0.96698684,0.004885888,0.02625054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074119803,0.00001761068,0.00017283975,0.0006811603,0.000009756412,0.0002773896,0.00045032226,0.0010433367,0.00011371009,0.7772407,0.21996787,0.000017870956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028114896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001316072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007831542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046199677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037542153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0335204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566284763","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i4.3620","title":"The Paradox of Charity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Interpretation (philosophy); Dialectic; Epistemology; Informal logic; Point (geometry); Limit (mathematics); Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10705498735975393,"score_gpt":0.2826222878400397,"score_spread":0.17556730048028574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566284763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04851702,0.006291361,0.05096108,0.34404323,0.0026200009,0.000060754184,0.00009089676,0.00019100726,0.5472247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9467205,0.0014632673,0.008435879,0.020950435,0.001310649,0.0001353956,0.000033999826,0.0002038811,0.02074611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749913,0.016812744,0.0005818991,0.002350717,0.0040128697,0.0012504201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96997607,0.021562126,0.0012198748,0.0030225264,0.0027921721,0.0014272449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021215046,0.00039708288,0.0009182058,0.0015924779,0.011198853,0.011866376,0.0016443549,0.007059021,0.007650604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042624798,0.00043966682,0.0008029232,0.0012999722,0.05051391,0.019718233,0.011788443,0.0149835525,0.0014282287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012428885,0.000006334096,0.00006415209,0.000023554769,0.0000031112243,0.000042180116,0.0024833675,0.00006405867,0.00003716951,0.9919418,0.0029372256,0.002384518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011797462,0.000004603724,0.000052056173,0.000044346958,0.0000026649388,0.00006200245,0.0008568423,0.00017174042,0.000070071415,0.97200996,0.026707636,0.0000062565573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015727937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011395643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021215046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005398601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005755093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11219728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567080196","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i3.4019","title":"Conductive Argument, An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Defeasible reasoning; Defeasible estate; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.12153300483844601,"score_gpt":0.3028597746975162,"score_spread":0.18132676985907017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567080196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010087621,0.094442084,0.2080218,0.09495268,0.0065221516,0.00009661525,0.00073878415,0.00053974683,0.5845985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5669198,0.061725836,0.16258748,0.012866158,0.00722548,0.00032987044,0.00092751207,0.001253389,0.18616451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976025,0.0013171247,0.000112756104,0.00036229237,0.0004860282,0.00011934989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996223,0.00262948,0.00016924935,0.0005791312,0.0002817998,0.00011737522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034842072,0.00077057653,0.00066349434,0.0019673917,0.0018747422,0.009615617,0.0020243216,0.0033366645,0.009433611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010026417,0.00067349593,0.0005966995,0.0016758532,0.011629584,0.01448606,0.0032531915,0.004290098,0.0022756672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001229647,0.0000063390316,0.00004289635,0.00008641006,0.000007780325,0.000059042926,0.0007605362,0.00027165393,0.00008206654,0.9625089,0.018481798,0.017680269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005677195,0.00000367397,0.000054734923,0.00017755742,0.000003999033,0.00009428862,0.0002400405,0.0005808126,0.00013263796,0.84957874,0.14912204,0.000005819058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014168418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024124736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009615617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024769632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027716192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031558514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568403290","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00417.x","title":"Contingent A Priori Knowledge","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.39910909695325986,"score_gpt":0.4157532890360827,"score_spread":0.016644192082822862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568403290","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013532826,0.004170995,0.52569026,0.03422002,0.001191686,0.00021142646,0.0005552318,0.000231977,0.42019555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7867831,0.004549488,0.16382004,0.009317026,0.0020365766,0.00082450174,0.00072362524,0.00017584648,0.031769793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884477,0.0049045817,0.0006698892,0.0026582554,0.0026764064,0.00064312393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697081,0.018438539,0.0020024665,0.005845798,0.0029914975,0.0010136389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013697574,0.0009809621,0.0012466997,0.0029077937,0.003790856,0.0074447533,0.003154032,0.004754839,0.016301744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032584604,0.0010460812,0.0020077303,0.0014012487,0.023227725,0.018977704,0.00742275,0.007919367,0.0031298746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008910643,0.00000872801,0.00009882442,0.00004420258,0.000010774334,0.000058290676,0.00031601146,0.00022647988,0.00006997344,0.99598396,0.00090464955,0.0022691453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000502456,0.0000064827846,0.00010261962,0.00008974181,0.000010222895,0.00007551846,0.00011140337,0.0007151072,0.00016705727,0.98601043,0.012696679,0.000009789964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017935878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017687987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016301744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00395673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037847022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072440565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575728999","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2277","title":"Belief and Negation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Negation; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Statement (logic); Informal logic; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04564318697619385,"score_gpt":0.24231837800679357,"score_spread":0.19667519103059972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575728999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041749366,0.030556165,0.2928665,0.057003636,0.0024515232,0.00008475373,0.000357214,0.00030153646,0.5746293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9439557,0.0068956427,0.02855109,0.004646476,0.0014038457,0.00015103222,0.00019762272,0.00010782768,0.014090848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928415,0.0046101296,0.0004105366,0.00077941275,0.0009682346,0.0003901675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98919606,0.008205599,0.0005452176,0.0008149581,0.0010151768,0.00022297102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005818826,0.00062182115,0.0007196948,0.0014544894,0.0029058272,0.0072792023,0.0011087566,0.003551964,0.007283297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012931697,0.00034038263,0.0008334396,0.0013576639,0.01758979,0.017975172,0.0035282585,0.004482014,0.0011015991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012518278,0.000003597066,0.00008316024,0.000036431084,0.0000042811976,0.000053302145,0.0011774715,0.00007781865,0.000066380526,0.9937756,0.0006711385,0.004038411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007591547,0.000008115451,0.00009208266,0.000059017715,0.00000530031,0.00009887529,0.00045152233,0.00030749626,0.00011153399,0.9801477,0.018702757,0.000008126983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027064981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012701367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007283297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032894772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011282488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030773282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581406839","doi":"10.1002/tht3.7","title":"Knowledge Norms and Acting Well","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.09713036496291498,"score_gpt":0.30029271442886024,"score_spread":0.20316234946594525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581406839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030983735,0.0031535362,0.108949214,0.07299086,0.0010531972,0.00009205162,0.00011370739,0.00018043177,0.7824833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9530763,0.001071018,0.018106434,0.006382442,0.00054146163,0.00017360324,0.000078928126,0.00008828865,0.020481404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98126686,0.010814655,0.00091299706,0.0025036014,0.0031223113,0.0013795642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97497195,0.01304504,0.0023329959,0.0041400827,0.0038577947,0.0016521509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017974844,0.0005904934,0.0007461812,0.001494643,0.005009376,0.008587844,0.001405023,0.0054453737,0.007592338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024499258,0.0003166219,0.00082504563,0.00084253954,0.04184049,0.014990466,0.005831235,0.0047220835,0.0014504484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035964176,0.000004139846,0.00008640405,0.000009294556,0.0000031828088,0.000014272169,0.0007798555,0.000117936455,0.000022607614,0.9971106,0.0006178869,0.0012302212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048265692,0.0000060419407,0.00009194993,0.000038076963,0.0000031146749,0.000020168307,0.0006681979,0.00029767837,0.00007226455,0.98614883,0.012641513,0.0000072727667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037234523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002457826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017974844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004087728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004324688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09506118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581876134","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i3.1137","title":"Useful Argumentation: A Critique of the Epistemological Approach","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Argumentative; Criticism; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07410902803833037,"score_gpt":0.2813987166423169,"score_spread":0.20728968860398655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581876134","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005989561,0.014789646,0.15243281,0.6517662,0.0052062976,0.00013470472,0.00010516819,0.00018503767,0.16939057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7395963,0.009691062,0.105657466,0.098833635,0.015947618,0.0015635674,0.00014393752,0.00071055186,0.02785582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.80873984,0.13610715,0.007252843,0.007660448,0.036758777,0.0034809348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7998903,0.14927036,0.007014059,0.013169371,0.026880108,0.003775759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10749986,0.0015056595,0.0023468235,0.008954079,0.014031596,0.022641849,0.009059437,0.024234172,0.004756538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15046369,0.0011944631,0.0028765504,0.0051064445,0.11217104,0.03440509,0.012994344,0.029209455,0.0021224844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005406521,0.000005516979,0.000022413788,0.00005739188,0.000006197933,0.00002328015,0.0013070357,0.000098788885,0.0000122330675,0.9941703,0.002827906,0.0014634965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016592392,0.0000034671648,0.000019646686,0.00011825349,0.0000040401073,0.00002653207,0.00037719155,0.00034592234,0.0000349556,0.9787185,0.020327026,0.000007901838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031379142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016631989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10749986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015347316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011986929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5685204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587538784","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i3.3681","title":"Denying the Antecedent: Its Effective Use in Argumentation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Fallacy; Epistemology; Position (finance); Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.10959721154376895,"score_gpt":0.29624302610621644,"score_spread":0.1866458145624475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587538784","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026630362,0.004716974,0.7133707,0.02311756,0.0007389947,0.0002946637,0.00009284552,0.0010454071,0.22999245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7316703,0.0017666958,0.24989918,0.001607178,0.00073933846,0.00035434493,0.00010724139,0.00040804266,0.013447705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95420015,0.03331265,0.0019454032,0.0031518436,0.006360769,0.0010291334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93366337,0.04806277,0.00240894,0.011443398,0.0033770616,0.0010443954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044592734,0.0011649083,0.0018256736,0.004128516,0.006082063,0.013542045,0.004323524,0.007327771,0.0063493885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070716485,0.0014040339,0.0014659159,0.0021170538,0.030289162,0.021649288,0.012474288,0.007077035,0.001744022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029862686,0.000019740099,0.00019003314,0.00009803015,0.000021087104,0.00012850673,0.0065397355,0.00029370576,0.00042165682,0.97790384,0.00086811645,0.013485756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031043626,0.000028585586,0.00013629008,0.00028038,0.000059456524,0.00019958382,0.001004018,0.0029341315,0.00095610204,0.9586802,0.03566293,0.000027318627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014181662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001314123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044592734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036575813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002630299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23583174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587773505","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498855","title":"Appearances of the Good","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":252,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Slogan; Epistemology; Form of the Good; Psychology; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.047430050037428076,"score_gpt":0.21389549977440658,"score_spread":0.16646544973697852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587773505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050464473,0.0037163498,0.0043137986,0.045937907,0.0026984764,0.000026695854,0.000056628476,0.00010321957,0.93810046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53663987,0.0038418614,0.00487865,0.025833292,0.0027081845,0.00009975175,0.00012941488,0.00056174526,0.42530715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99136895,0.0038429827,0.00021126641,0.00077250774,0.0029498164,0.00085447513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951733,0.0017385862,0.0003367125,0.0008418065,0.001074664,0.0008349059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005625654,0.00062401814,0.0005324764,0.0013037515,0.0066414964,0.014339584,0.00094017904,0.0035678549,0.019150075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013427194,0.00046537787,0.0005703505,0.0009536839,0.03010606,0.011932347,0.008458834,0.009798512,0.003912333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020951145,0.00001067943,0.00016631933,0.000046881796,0.0000035245914,0.00011798913,0.0075530196,0.00003149149,0.0001230894,0.93422604,0.049316697,0.0083834445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008925517,0.000021164176,0.00045602515,0.0001644748,0.00000703401,0.00040471932,0.0052691125,0.000111966176,0.000131554,0.16054599,0.8328616,0.00001732575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030695263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040760064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019150075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004537088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027038984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06406337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587985520","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2264","title":"The Place of Informal Logic in Philosophy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Epistemology; Parallels; Informal logic; Foundationalism; Connection (principal bundle); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Philosophy; Argumentation theory; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06053618799393396,"score_gpt":0.2578871470784355,"score_spread":0.19735095908450156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587985520","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032360576,0.016922433,0.5845244,0.09997885,0.0016937434,0.000079077225,0.00010947169,0.00044162097,0.26388988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90950793,0.005644982,0.062277302,0.008823276,0.0022894773,0.0002869013,0.00007099613,0.00023085732,0.010868351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988926,0.007953445,0.00038478157,0.00079963007,0.0014111552,0.00052507606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9653954,0.024891473,0.0019008998,0.0049042506,0.0017667192,0.0011412455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014980843,0.00076645083,0.0009432952,0.0030887083,0.005230429,0.012711099,0.002159481,0.004325719,0.004512191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01739784,0.0005998419,0.0010242752,0.0024686065,0.04814741,0.020411031,0.0065428535,0.006868148,0.00097285945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042492175,0.00000378423,0.00006413279,0.00002031477,0.0000021868238,0.000017398197,0.00064253027,0.00017754319,0.000021402535,0.9970487,0.00022049507,0.0017773387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056922495,0.0000059865697,0.00003320268,0.000039911018,0.000002965634,0.00002013247,0.00015861336,0.000650467,0.000036599336,0.99113375,0.007908203,0.000004460686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024088211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001188039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014980843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006077764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003284411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07922721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597492954","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i1.4209","title":"Bogency and Goodacies: On Argument Quality in Virtue Argumentation Theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Epistemology; Philosophy; Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.14301484125915587,"score_gpt":0.3319198136403934,"score_spread":0.18890497238123755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597492954","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28289405,0.011351202,0.33308917,0.07324914,0.00084456475,0.00035153402,0.0003409281,0.00038705012,0.29749247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770461,0.0005158443,0.019659558,0.00093130977,0.00024510353,0.00010674632,0.00005913166,0.00011827804,0.001317994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.936971,0.04266458,0.0040574805,0.0036955338,0.010679247,0.0019321238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63010454,0.3189756,0.013692813,0.016887572,0.01666871,0.003670799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0632002,0.0007119278,0.0022150488,0.009197053,0.005374385,0.01839279,0.002984636,0.00859065,0.009238834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24669723,0.0010535733,0.0015186166,0.005430138,0.04127612,0.032012746,0.010911382,0.008496668,0.000838684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073667325,0.000031365005,0.001620883,0.00013518633,0.000034472007,0.000057327536,0.0032758147,0.0007940316,0.000087612854,0.9852497,0.0005104468,0.008129564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022528897,0.000013930041,0.00048402097,0.000109869405,0.000013548009,0.000037948346,0.00061972195,0.002242083,0.00006400404,0.99514765,0.0012303247,0.00001433166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012460793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009836748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0632002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056075873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023646792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33423853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599635683","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00425.x","title":"Unifying the Intellectual Virtues","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Virtue; Trait; Conscientiousness; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Disposition; Cognition; Character traits; Generativity; Psychology; Cognitive science; Sociology; Social psychology; Big Five personality traits; Personality; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.4003030367602114,"score_gpt":0.3891509522163667,"score_spread":0.011152084543844698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599635683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30483496,0.004424453,0.12933306,0.02699704,0.0003895275,0.00016362446,0.00013226901,0.00014603835,0.533579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888459,0.000449342,0.007987186,0.00036677445,0.00006423579,0.000041314415,0.000019013032,0.000011749594,0.002214567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976255,0.0012183528,0.00011858781,0.0002908314,0.00045284937,0.00029383562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967507,0.0015856302,0.00041846986,0.0005876413,0.00036688044,0.00029067893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039215717,0.00025499208,0.0003881436,0.001658974,0.0016619097,0.004992386,0.0005460641,0.001422013,0.0020769127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051738364,0.00020594377,0.0003741047,0.0006641596,0.027576318,0.007925721,0.005469952,0.002361817,0.00021460498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067842448,0.000009735895,0.0009159138,0.000033813543,0.0000035234823,0.000038469727,0.0034351912,0.00012604852,0.00015853072,0.9891852,0.00018151557,0.005905213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008640659,0.00001573331,0.0028521493,0.00007114715,0.000006438853,0.00012798906,0.0023554985,0.00065080606,0.00013672994,0.9842582,0.00950759,0.000009146614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007859186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009675006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004992386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018168436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021384016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020739496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600275594","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i3.1138","title":"Useful Advice and Good Arguments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04805469277669199,"score_gpt":0.26024519275710234,"score_spread":0.21219049998041034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600275594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044005048,0.012709538,0.06563611,0.7551502,0.006923042,0.00008469645,0.000069203874,0.00027363197,0.15475304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60075146,0.01318374,0.10699042,0.17616187,0.009476389,0.00047131415,0.0001648177,0.0007145126,0.09208548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94843566,0.038135797,0.001747002,0.0020779655,0.008008739,0.0015947836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8980055,0.07749439,0.0038471087,0.0047786627,0.013138961,0.0027353761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038772807,0.00083364296,0.0010564805,0.0030061575,0.007022082,0.00975622,0.0020564632,0.010742863,0.011237851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11379403,0.0005557055,0.0008633943,0.0021920926,0.031315207,0.019912967,0.005752046,0.011413673,0.0037960652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017194492,0.000009050376,0.0000849344,0.000094654526,0.000009887762,0.00006313016,0.0024997317,0.00016512499,0.0000412792,0.9504822,0.03903485,0.007497937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017580414,0.0000087915105,0.00004851493,0.00026250095,0.000005872146,0.000058063386,0.0019484368,0.0004046319,0.00012988284,0.86347705,0.13362102,0.000017647437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002692001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038772807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061693485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045771697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20505267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603925014","doi":"","title":"Crossing the Rubicon: Of Sniffer Dogs, Justifications, and Preemptive Deference","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Political science; Psychology; Law; Criminology","score_opus":0.0602817095660839,"score_gpt":0.26273024308975446,"score_spread":0.20244853352367057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603925014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1115253,0.0056419643,0.110707015,0.056061912,0.0007061834,0.00007728252,0.00009513112,0.00013856475,0.71504664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810347,0.0004205944,0.006350493,0.0012335343,0.00017367832,0.000045174667,0.0000149001235,0.000065987646,0.010660857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993905,0.003866744,0.0001784382,0.00077457336,0.0007828705,0.0004923906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98731565,0.00822874,0.0007981986,0.0020095713,0.001210376,0.0004374007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0095772445,0.00041049562,0.00088047364,0.002041078,0.0063954494,0.008104448,0.001873536,0.006344952,0.0105722835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026652427,0.0006260763,0.0005375617,0.0015090952,0.049967937,0.019688642,0.004632996,0.0074142413,0.0007639807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070780593,0.0000047809854,0.000065980465,0.000007191648,0.0000014729892,0.000021654916,0.0017792349,0.00005681079,0.000016192369,0.99612063,0.00054151466,0.001377459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009030697,0.0000053655594,0.000079780606,0.000033220163,0.0000034567706,0.000035517474,0.0010844932,0.00038669462,0.000047228208,0.99137676,0.0069320807,0.0000063834186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004395689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043351743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0105722835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034404148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031829285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05064994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1609079276","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i3.536","title":"Cogency, Compactness and Microstructure","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Relevance (law); Epistemology; Philosophy; Set (abstract data type); Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04873003567549325,"score_gpt":0.2642242689700556,"score_spread":0.21549423329456233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1609079276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10688199,0.012712072,0.08798584,0.022892723,0.00054740533,0.00011960737,0.00046493034,0.00050261157,0.76789284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582951,0.0012376606,0.013508256,0.0012581848,0.0005701141,0.0001352627,0.00022246817,0.00013547274,0.024637405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978508,0.00090207503,0.000098653,0.00059507124,0.00037093286,0.00018260644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975044,0.0013988243,0.00023928015,0.0004785852,0.00026159958,0.00011736648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019548861,0.00043976243,0.00077442697,0.0015303858,0.002757545,0.004672202,0.0008830417,0.0018059355,0.008457639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045206593,0.00046529618,0.000837985,0.0013671585,0.021936482,0.007316868,0.0030416343,0.002074162,0.0011382478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056993554,0.000002523205,0.0000987167,0.000013017122,0.0000033688211,0.000012897506,0.00019627534,0.00012880255,0.000040002593,0.99733114,0.00079338124,0.0013742858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006812327,0.0000062808685,0.00028088255,0.000011237082,0.0000030949102,0.000031162806,0.00006487749,0.00023283096,0.0000561598,0.9870925,0.012211151,0.0000029978426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015242326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012573543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008457639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036394622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010660756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02829361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1630140543","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12218","title":"The Radicalism of Truth‐insensitive Epistemology: Truth's Profound Effect on the Evaluation of Belief","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Rationality; Embodied cognition; Proposition; Philosophy of mind; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.5846625795976647,"score_gpt":0.43469490414118683,"score_spread":0.14996767545647782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1630140543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1268226,0.011244646,0.29632652,0.13581567,0.0019956576,0.00011797433,0.00031448825,0.00056940573,0.426793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97495836,0.0012646898,0.016590768,0.002857192,0.0007834192,0.00008355499,0.00002981081,0.00018260254,0.0032494795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.978114,0.012914423,0.0007157886,0.0020971012,0.0052764905,0.0008821463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9083976,0.07451395,0.0031841013,0.008707502,0.0041298415,0.0010669738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027011842,0.0007376391,0.0013328006,0.0025725083,0.0039736456,0.010712817,0.0022734022,0.004614377,0.0053210817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.080789134,0.0008207975,0.001230305,0.0012702213,0.06368695,0.022811813,0.009046616,0.012310052,0.0005668589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029093067,0.000007781711,0.00015859974,0.000040448696,0.000014127013,0.000029886729,0.0013297346,0.00025014282,0.00019286691,0.9932486,0.000614518,0.0040841983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012815435,0.000009598573,0.00010518056,0.000020186635,0.000006782362,0.000027085682,0.00013047745,0.00034912975,0.00019176179,0.9973456,0.0017916437,0.000009679837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014508747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063931814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027011842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040046065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021136699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14285398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1636038418","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i2.3298","title":"Critical Thinking in Moral Argumentation Contexts: A Virtue Ethical Approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Virtue; Epistemic virtue; Sociology; Criticism; Deliberation; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.09585343320322942,"score_gpt":0.3224022864574426,"score_spread":0.2265488532542132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1636038418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021420708,0.010096535,0.40902933,0.11427248,0.002134996,0.00025046986,0.000048695565,0.00018081177,0.4425659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89802676,0.002086186,0.078886926,0.005864763,0.002441533,0.0005760356,0.000030363899,0.00012048848,0.011966885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96789604,0.026859254,0.00058703416,0.0009435078,0.0028821323,0.0008320244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9656862,0.027170733,0.0015259596,0.0017301978,0.002384503,0.0015023556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02332071,0.000977932,0.0009666225,0.005199412,0.008501092,0.015240396,0.0025242823,0.009070334,0.0035452617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022054225,0.0006124732,0.0010222436,0.002129363,0.080130436,0.014524095,0.00882515,0.009262884,0.0008048302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024248013,0.0000062055556,0.000027585153,0.000017557884,0.0000017432009,0.000022727529,0.0011662486,0.00009670292,0.000017566877,0.99739516,0.0004036023,0.0008425728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102204085,0.000004301506,0.000024983268,0.000056577428,0.0000017641212,0.00002992756,0.00072604953,0.00052303466,0.00003291096,0.9854219,0.013163897,0.0000043971263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009399909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089199666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02332071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007320751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004800253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123333156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1642974254","doi":"10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06186.x","title":"Who am I? Beyond “I think, therefore I am”","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Sociology","score_opus":0.25595479912891816,"score_gpt":0.33611576646334124,"score_spread":0.08016096733442307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1642974254","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075467117,0.018853104,0.006052468,0.8121885,0.008819454,0.000053571897,0.00007037772,0.00005931158,0.14635634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5131672,0.0192835,0.0065596155,0.3555034,0.013775071,0.00025736433,0.00017092426,0.00021046272,0.09107242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909123,0.0064036394,0.00024668776,0.000741908,0.0011428394,0.00055254885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810457,0.012707241,0.0013716479,0.00074721925,0.0025880195,0.0015401231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0106421895,0.00088790135,0.0008341256,0.0013202607,0.009407368,0.011389783,0.0013130952,0.007914473,0.007108238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029003149,0.00032047057,0.0006188308,0.00088423636,0.031405196,0.016385578,0.0053787585,0.016156344,0.0032384265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006832657,0.000056596335,0.0017044549,0.00021023536,0.000027321492,0.0001778972,0.06353086,0.000098238925,0.00029489546,0.7156509,0.19042924,0.027751017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012124902,0.000030433202,0.00084857224,0.00061689306,0.000011684371,0.0002119657,0.050139185,0.00027104374,0.00038961912,0.32846636,0.61897045,0.000031759293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039045599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005956781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011389783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003224948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044198763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056281924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1644355636","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00504.x","title":"The Bootstrapping Problem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bootstrapping (finance); Allowance (engineering); Computer science; Face (sociological concept); Focus (optics); Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Econometrics; Mathematics; Sociology; Economics; Operations management","score_opus":0.12466450989942629,"score_gpt":0.27951727796171755,"score_spread":0.15485276806229126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1644355636","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043631785,0.002356918,0.75701517,0.06982518,0.0014034127,0.00039413056,0.00063848513,0.0010339179,0.12370101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8398536,0.0012712667,0.13605346,0.008067177,0.0018922861,0.00059858675,0.0007671177,0.0005740029,0.010922605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93524885,0.03784542,0.0032379609,0.009697343,0.011995187,0.0019752358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6678974,0.25404564,0.008399429,0.050270975,0.017165897,0.0022206097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04757181,0.0008979898,0.0021573931,0.003887271,0.007022803,0.0066860327,0.004545119,0.008950389,0.015506888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2879495,0.0012117011,0.0018118608,0.004542063,0.023123087,0.023493111,0.010446678,0.010777916,0.0027740796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071300994,0.000033448487,0.0013876327,0.00014751931,0.00006656754,0.00044883302,0.001953745,0.0019373996,0.00018764235,0.9473978,0.010810823,0.03555731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020302727,0.0000076186507,0.00013889687,0.00007911306,0.000012941495,0.00021593754,0.0002956748,0.0043908674,0.0002354256,0.9850552,0.009531168,0.000016809208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025118708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010447312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04757181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031559784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027853174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2515868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1663699010","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2266","title":"How Philosophical is Informal Logic?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Philosophy of logic; Epistemology; Proposition; Mainstream; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08901164352835382,"score_gpt":0.26421813869440863,"score_spread":0.1752064951660548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1663699010","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018086595,0.02362674,0.09289654,0.59542406,0.0035145497,0.00006685816,0.00016480935,0.00028098328,0.26593885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88265526,0.016872143,0.016453508,0.058489002,0.0048678275,0.00022594935,0.00015902678,0.0002327379,0.020044515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927583,0.0045062792,0.000256739,0.0006853638,0.0012135284,0.00057988166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98482877,0.010077367,0.0010726922,0.0010689932,0.0020741066,0.00087807624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0092072515,0.00046450764,0.0005366998,0.0028528746,0.0047594174,0.013501865,0.0013977428,0.0050520827,0.008001897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025724575,0.000320113,0.0005539678,0.0025113598,0.03781256,0.024625517,0.0038581444,0.0049736584,0.0017127801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006139599,0.0000066183875,0.00013667262,0.000043855587,0.0000059698023,0.00003448067,0.0017638165,0.00007287941,0.000026948212,0.9895838,0.0043090875,0.004009784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005991395,0.000004097045,0.000105231156,0.000076860815,0.000003272264,0.000051558032,0.002228787,0.00017392424,0.000040518604,0.961601,0.03570295,0.0000057415837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048154504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026482833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013501865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004948803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039036514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04869318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1678981692","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511809835.019","title":"Confluence proofs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Confluence; Mathematical proof; Computer science; Mathematics; Programming language; Geometry","score_opus":0.07376159514462419,"score_gpt":0.21819818391125126,"score_spread":0.14443658876662707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1678981692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021223854,0.004373223,0.20366776,0.013676824,0.005081864,0.00035456952,0.008432245,0.0066183894,0.7556728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18054406,0.012122498,0.18215705,0.014224992,0.0094613675,0.00169056,0.03036406,0.021550171,0.54788524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99230325,0.0017621178,0.0005718571,0.001506893,0.0031017473,0.00075420423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98256665,0.006480698,0.00043591685,0.0039517907,0.005859361,0.0007055038],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005254067,0.0020646546,0.0018520197,0.0042197537,0.0039998395,0.0089630075,0.0032288379,0.002167328,0.30012098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029228296,0.001092358,0.0033370166,0.0045745224,0.002959581,0.014774861,0.007594397,0.007122271,0.15095368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006744941,0.000052059513,0.00024334651,0.0005373099,0.000044256383,0.0001936863,0.00023891167,0.0004696408,0.00062545453,0.6743315,0.2694373,0.05375913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039580533,0.000017431512,0.0001930642,0.00018694357,0.000042663425,0.00029813751,0.00010296934,0.0011352587,0.0013866607,0.6767614,0.3198032,0.00003273677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019494356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021832618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30012098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044110785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034776968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1682413908","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v45i1.184291","title":"The First Cycle of Study: Teaching and Learning at Cross Purposes?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Higher education; Student engagement; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Pedagogy; Investment (military); Sociology; Public relations; Medical education; Mathematics education; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.05508912867855515,"score_gpt":0.311031780735716,"score_spread":0.2559426520571609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1682413908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2803788,0.009223689,0.056516908,0.15219213,0.0039599463,0.0013148183,0.0003292302,0.0006987777,0.49538577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86128944,0.0019109258,0.018417358,0.01640776,0.00050011475,0.00088715745,0.00024622248,0.00034525097,0.09999565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99151707,0.004439066,0.00020601584,0.0009548879,0.001517989,0.0013649203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97656494,0.004091763,0.0013679202,0.003272942,0.0026710224,0.01203143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009619264,0.00041396238,0.0007756914,0.0013378093,0.007738236,0.021879282,0.0022180923,0.00467943,0.016560359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029578736,0.00067583926,0.00077004696,0.0011437905,0.011807845,0.013603819,0.016325474,0.0069516087,0.004650766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022675074,0.0008280541,0.026781628,0.000385766,0.00002992706,0.00060762314,0.21467492,0.00020900137,0.0019658003,0.5092358,0.04794797,0.19710685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007467552,0.0009170519,0.025081499,0.0018232,0.000031599797,0.0012024718,0.1665326,0.0011253307,0.0014796793,0.18995473,0.611667,0.000110324756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068969307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007395208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021879282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071152747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016600493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055399895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1693546959","doi":"10.1080/00048402.2013.800126","title":"Cognitive Phenomenology, edited by Tim Bayne and Michelle Montague","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Cognition; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Epistemology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.039703474022320176,"score_gpt":0.25473980634755145,"score_spread":0.21503633232523128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1693546959","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002214258,0.8700414,0.01296804,0.04318536,0.016034076,0.00008010075,0.00085029175,0.00016561133,0.054460943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06583511,0.7373407,0.020147191,0.010651827,0.0126676895,0.00043397327,0.0014747486,0.0005755888,0.15087318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992817,0.00034256282,0.000055777637,0.000113286245,0.00017329465,0.00003341994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976768,0.0016239288,0.00009068377,0.00013472365,0.00034400693,0.00012998203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024605352,0.0014991009,0.0012397534,0.003188804,0.0021739854,0.0072169728,0.0013013434,0.0027015475,0.010374809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048594484,0.0009903952,0.0006569045,0.003929089,0.006168413,0.008219153,0.0022351216,0.0050044544,0.0031120218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000761934,0.00007689447,0.00047117771,0.002265517,0.000044590535,0.00021359738,0.019252574,0.00093711977,0.0007810054,0.22552046,0.5771282,0.17323266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017099095,0.0000135693035,0.0013169065,0.001868337,0.000011691926,0.00042139014,0.004831688,0.00028691813,0.00016760862,0.098233834,0.8928053,0.0000257438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021076247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03376886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021076247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037221755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053000315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04190719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1701715910","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01708.x","title":"AN ARCHIMEDEAN POINT FOR PHILOSOPHY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Skepticism; Philosophy; Linguistics; Sociology","score_opus":0.22046507543278415,"score_gpt":0.29212079601589697,"score_spread":0.07165572058311281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1701715910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020363135,0.010097426,0.11260935,0.18361934,0.0033667285,0.00008220544,0.000247687,0.00019586984,0.66941833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8499544,0.004396532,0.04230482,0.024217827,0.00353326,0.00046275603,0.0001569334,0.00018085295,0.074792735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969664,0.0016936283,0.00010196882,0.00045108926,0.0006416877,0.00014518588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771285,0.0011045912,0.00016081754,0.00038770077,0.00045937518,0.00017474036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044499952,0.00046603105,0.00039153325,0.0014444834,0.0043077,0.005794915,0.0011478623,0.0031693247,0.005774878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038088884,0.00021763197,0.00051718025,0.00094771205,0.037179094,0.0076575507,0.0034989167,0.006512875,0.0014025545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022969089,0.0000025205447,0.00001371005,0.000008080094,6.2980206e-7,0.0000059131635,0.00036750737,0.000029112356,0.000017885248,0.9981055,0.0008763819,0.0005704608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004888347,0.0000042937736,0.00003276563,0.00003298711,0.0000014032985,0.000019511086,0.00024481083,0.00016169623,0.00005270858,0.96993005,0.029512586,0.0000021994351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001495849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010143236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005794915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052353563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002884062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037985384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1702479143","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2282","title":"Johnson's Manifest Rationality A Pragmatic Theory of Argument","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.049566897329281025,"score_gpt":0.2604724410737302,"score_spread":0.21090554374444917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1702479143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005895599,0.014370591,0.2097745,0.07778518,0.0018452442,0.0001725133,0.00029141913,0.00032768602,0.6895373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68349254,0.013838109,0.102890335,0.024790261,0.0044031343,0.0008878452,0.00025712381,0.00051213236,0.16892855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99123794,0.0046308185,0.00038284253,0.00097104255,0.0022028354,0.00057449663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940426,0.003988362,0.00035478538,0.00072956353,0.0006799198,0.00020470905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065051443,0.0009805985,0.0009413522,0.0024025126,0.0041116765,0.013091635,0.0017774437,0.005241168,0.0059955395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010853878,0.0006238335,0.0011724008,0.0022801014,0.03302226,0.014066947,0.00331134,0.006093737,0.002007373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022295342,0.000002181013,0.000012758204,0.0000138771,0.0000019311926,0.000011396261,0.00019547642,0.000097344404,0.000014246766,0.9962,0.0023142612,0.0011343439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071961213,0.0000037872212,0.000023476392,0.000038273483,0.0000033988342,0.000024022143,0.00012835958,0.00033732803,0.000048355458,0.94807327,0.051306587,0.000005787189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057379785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004364404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013091635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008186648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006198806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05939859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17145050","doi":"10.1023/a:1020832916983","title":"Is there anything wrong with ``God of the gaps'' reasoning?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of religion; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.055926631845081815,"score_gpt":0.28258501510021533,"score_spread":0.22665838325513352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17145050","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01860712,0.010875619,0.08899058,0.7558611,0.008931344,0.00006109962,0.0002326145,0.00030672012,0.11613371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81127936,0.006076186,0.053095024,0.11168536,0.0063165016,0.00015469933,0.00024115176,0.00032921328,0.010822562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866773,0.007900963,0.0005236733,0.0012225843,0.0026448083,0.001030697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96058816,0.023873087,0.0026889725,0.0046845023,0.0063021057,0.0018631548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021396188,0.0008550265,0.0020675391,0.0023489716,0.0059595658,0.008484489,0.008145932,0.01044106,0.013324677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06189846,0.0006882023,0.0013136112,0.0016373385,0.043134253,0.029908836,0.006195717,0.017683659,0.002708593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008050199,0.000049572853,0.00058654055,0.00020516437,0.00011255522,0.00017839378,0.004012999,0.00031241198,0.00012625715,0.9590897,0.022654468,0.012591385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023496666,0.0000071184463,0.00012453608,0.00013637303,0.000014585392,0.00005463462,0.0022757316,0.0004509377,0.0000943385,0.9805464,0.016256392,0.000015521864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048626987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004415541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021396188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002878467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052150963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113155246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1750196828","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12187","title":"Intuitions, Meaning, and Normativity: Why Intuition Theory Supports a Non‐Descriptivist Metaethic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Intuition; Expressivism; Normative; Epistemology; Categorization; Linguistic description; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.4158417246648114,"score_gpt":0.37561754985732937,"score_spread":0.04022417480748203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1750196828","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20636277,0.008132793,0.17914337,0.32145315,0.0020123802,0.0001258613,0.00046356634,0.0006213938,0.28168467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759616,0.00039977074,0.015121177,0.0052517382,0.00032797427,0.000096485055,0.000071795206,0.0001105285,0.0026589197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908456,0.0047608023,0.0004406175,0.0014789357,0.001942074,0.0005319354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9737181,0.014593816,0.0018195669,0.0042454493,0.004547502,0.0010755162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015548239,0.0005166907,0.00096049835,0.0021923908,0.00308351,0.00750626,0.001862679,0.0045293584,0.004273087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030237377,0.00060333894,0.0013701656,0.0008276516,0.046271756,0.019682908,0.0040250523,0.0067521366,0.0010408573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022838605,0.000015672467,0.00034408676,0.000037438866,0.000011821808,0.000026145963,0.0011320955,0.00017538636,0.00010473987,0.99472237,0.0014491872,0.001958231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017035767,0.000007113834,0.0002561305,0.000025692327,0.0000033935014,0.00002148456,0.0003490564,0.0004963035,0.000069672744,0.9959881,0.0027570154,0.000009006118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027730549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012205965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015548239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047410424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026625886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082227945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1752226307","doi":"10.7202/1044576ar","title":"Le relativisme moral et le projet de coopération épistémique","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.05471432133578694,"score_gpt":0.28404523879794596,"score_spread":0.22933091746215903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1752226307","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05284869,0.009894001,0.4098265,0.14093478,0.0018417652,0.00012724492,0.00006714044,0.00025132735,0.38420856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93143004,0.0044390606,0.04186036,0.0044135856,0.001132652,0.00032337863,0.00004208385,0.00023402995,0.016124822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96406,0.025486685,0.00089024636,0.0031079438,0.005004134,0.0014509559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96712106,0.020802537,0.0025720538,0.0059608226,0.0022330051,0.0013104822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03791356,0.0009362824,0.0013672541,0.0029474641,0.0070694494,0.012269345,0.003170093,0.007965841,0.006273189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028877733,0.0006407611,0.0013329764,0.0020780456,0.06947023,0.021550572,0.01434319,0.01127726,0.0009990999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031049703,0.0000036411245,0.000055861627,0.000019910214,0.0000029372356,0.000008641286,0.0011822794,0.00009316289,0.000025756372,0.99741155,0.00016496872,0.0010280975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012877327,0.000021747832,0.00017375972,0.00011236545,0.000007737372,0.000055395496,0.0022467915,0.0005134518,0.00015419885,0.96545625,0.031231862,0.000013633114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023044674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018933655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03791356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008739355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009081527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20050848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1754502781","doi":"","title":"Varela, Francisco J. Ethical Know-How: Action, Wisdom, and Cognition.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Cognition; Psychology; Need to know; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Neuroscience; Computer science","score_opus":0.06150448730298648,"score_gpt":0.28566309333140055,"score_spread":0.2241586060284141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1754502781","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040474883,0.6005731,0.01349581,0.27756467,0.005379827,0.0000704883,0.00039175502,0.00014900161,0.09832781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31550235,0.5700452,0.026678087,0.031562414,0.004650671,0.00030387778,0.00030132727,0.00026255404,0.050693545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885774,0.0005291374,0.00010626721,0.0000882573,0.00033632977,0.0000823197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98619103,0.009660005,0.0004094647,0.00038026716,0.002765151,0.0005940389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039937175,0.00074398465,0.00077518594,0.0045457925,0.004885911,0.005305419,0.0016269416,0.0052639297,0.0066639422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018600399,0.0005794518,0.0004443808,0.0024899167,0.010934593,0.008552906,0.0017414687,0.006959168,0.0014549237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013101057,0.00007620201,0.0013309991,0.0011463641,0.00005730075,0.00060225336,0.026260879,0.00059723726,0.00038979037,0.42424953,0.35788298,0.1872755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051576648,0.00003080076,0.0049686115,0.0027840831,0.00009180924,0.0005044907,0.012914948,0.00038329442,0.0005688029,0.54085904,0.43677378,0.00006871114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051864117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08519763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051864117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037036054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005921541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10312444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1760838892","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1039","title":"Introduction: Deep Disagreement Re-examined","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05390979412536434,"score_gpt":0.260394562558912,"score_spread":0.20648476843354768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1760838892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025968863,0.011622046,0.120144516,0.37851202,0.018245768,0.000225621,0.0011565557,0.0006035269,0.44352108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79704547,0.004398333,0.025995905,0.061232917,0.0123351,0.00043068142,0.000867773,0.0010307045,0.09666316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881612,0.005789499,0.0006021785,0.002068222,0.002539122,0.0008397955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9527939,0.029734746,0.001880083,0.006518103,0.008082347,0.000990761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012057682,0.000751495,0.00081828714,0.0034261525,0.0060311635,0.0106648905,0.0031967028,0.006468967,0.031745993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045960065,0.00043074592,0.0010425404,0.0029972787,0.018785713,0.016288942,0.0066510383,0.013548059,0.0047329627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028704057,0.000011920436,0.00019681996,0.00014787783,0.000009346896,0.00004474401,0.0045968667,0.00010028536,0.00015780669,0.95771956,0.025229154,0.011756912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016766475,0.000012970046,0.00045486746,0.00055166695,0.00001522467,0.000120216784,0.0037973265,0.0006732199,0.0004749572,0.81189156,0.1819647,0.000026543967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025491829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021437735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031745993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059353695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004805742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10620093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1776105220","doi":"10.1353/hms.2009.a403838","title":"Doxastic Virtues in Hume's Epistemology","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Causation; Essentialism; Philosophy of science","score_opus":0.14331821018823493,"score_gpt":0.3434410694255357,"score_spread":0.20012285923730078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1776105220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09469945,0.0064796256,0.21978174,0.05307075,0.0006438045,0.0000769129,0.00011044196,0.00028441538,0.6248529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97804195,0.0005414248,0.010768976,0.0019267851,0.0001841306,0.00006197124,0.000017225655,0.000026667709,0.008430849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700624,0.0018779553,0.00009673973,0.00026481005,0.0004870444,0.00026725704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954122,0.0027428379,0.00027770337,0.0006404051,0.00056827994,0.00035863943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007343727,0.00027816033,0.00049845723,0.0014612323,0.0035323563,0.0044239005,0.0007756345,0.002289014,0.002539909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058349823,0.00021033664,0.00038737254,0.0006790798,0.031877685,0.0056166905,0.0044126976,0.002774936,0.00036795295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027780713,0.0000037683278,0.00008474765,0.000009162055,0.0000013586475,0.000011027586,0.0010525914,0.00007535384,0.000019984705,0.9972506,0.0002961673,0.0011923647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004204078,0.0000043334817,0.00011045906,0.000016649443,0.0000013827147,0.000024152017,0.00035436038,0.00030966458,0.000056253968,0.98874,0.010374255,0.0000041443823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012536471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013869843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007343727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002464609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021473833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03883779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1779280761","doi":"","title":"A New Middle Ground Between Humanitarian Non-Governmental Organizations and Epistemic Communities? The Cases of the Ottawa Convention and the Convention on Cluster Munitions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Convention; Political science; Epistemic community; Public administration; Public relations; Context (archaeology); Humanitarian aid; State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.027612221698923356,"score_gpt":0.23739127006548175,"score_spread":0.2097790483665584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1779280761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1379977,0.009468579,0.019208765,0.25818878,0.0014308722,0.00019921527,0.00006561983,0.00008369239,0.5733566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822467,0.0009944985,0.0023904426,0.0068332837,0.00031844946,0.00014584768,0.000016500053,0.00004199444,0.007012235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.961067,0.026333395,0.000688884,0.002691794,0.0035918523,0.005627091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.965278,0.022750203,0.0024819295,0.0028863682,0.0020035808,0.0045998227],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03192941,0.00080540875,0.00082706974,0.0051480397,0.040578704,0.03560177,0.0033095824,0.016838668,0.0071035614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030546552,0.000960524,0.0011834877,0.0039617643,0.14651638,0.061244935,0.025246467,0.014569764,0.0007264865],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001574945,0.000012765171,0.00025079487,0.000016617294,0.0000018506937,0.00012484704,0.041360885,0.000042587882,0.000027005526,0.95546085,0.0011055398,0.0015804498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009955399,0.00004186839,0.0008350774,0.0006004862,0.00001618068,0.00028417146,0.16995575,0.00057725835,0.00016346616,0.6595385,0.16780536,0.00008236301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050851084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043498207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9594213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025099145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021590943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18210787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1786940742","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00447.x","title":"Belief Ascription and Context Dependence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Ascription; Context (archaeology); Proposition; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.19211245606870664,"score_gpt":0.2563218023199825,"score_spread":0.06420934625127583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1786940742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82551914,0.00126671,0.05773377,0.002775626,0.000052889114,0.000065249515,0.00027124598,0.000121225334,0.11219408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983871,0.00005939429,0.0011931397,0.00007158398,0.000011109184,0.000007646284,0.000019457364,0.000006959432,0.00024379285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99437165,0.0030554973,0.00030191924,0.0006742003,0.0013260511,0.0002706015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9532783,0.03190221,0.0050433674,0.005061731,0.004060518,0.0006538873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049831937,0.00022527088,0.0003533229,0.0013071527,0.0006995811,0.0032873063,0.0007502246,0.0009076499,0.0043993294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03583776,0.0003696136,0.00028311872,0.0011353845,0.005614824,0.0049705016,0.0026611239,0.0017675034,0.00024496554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068444357,0.0001991702,0.06917703,0.0005864417,0.00029746286,0.00082093984,0.03398028,0.0041506574,0.012803728,0.7896948,0.0010473579,0.0865576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088897876,0.00021705012,0.11088652,0.00035553216,0.00020857368,0.00094387174,0.010027886,0.012010323,0.00988042,0.8454018,0.009830682,0.00014833611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009557556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004828373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049831937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010861068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005040553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026353896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1799915287","doi":"10.1002/tht3.100","title":"Basic Knowledge and Contextualist “E = K”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Subject (documents); Identification (biology); Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.06956186225621573,"score_gpt":0.27674724919219484,"score_spread":0.2071853869359791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1799915287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03718149,0.0066174637,0.23870575,0.11837629,0.0010968489,0.0002362987,0.0002562827,0.00018842448,0.5973412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416484,0.0013281186,0.04025647,0.009214202,0.00047079808,0.00030101408,0.00006698218,0.0000726472,0.006641382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98081034,0.012221446,0.0012018485,0.0027100556,0.002128935,0.0009274172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97146535,0.018511128,0.0018054317,0.0051375236,0.0022766425,0.000803867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020667022,0.0007613102,0.001076872,0.0029094035,0.006067311,0.008413833,0.0020866413,0.0058453814,0.0049172067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024171354,0.00094954047,0.001129833,0.0023857413,0.09547172,0.020596692,0.009996233,0.008167667,0.00063607696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006589654,0.0000027494636,0.000068858564,0.00003788993,0.0000047379062,0.000022919288,0.0010984868,0.000045617195,0.000024071858,0.99735343,0.0002960823,0.0010386575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011032305,0.0000067053825,0.000100927566,0.00008142492,0.0000056952904,0.00004167179,0.0006909558,0.00010602164,0.00008891466,0.9894546,0.009404291,0.000007767084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049533625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005573275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020667022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005106231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051261066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109298944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1831783994","doi":"","title":"Arne Naess and Possibilism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Trumpeter","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mantis; Biology","score_opus":0.027262574236213314,"score_gpt":0.21755593709203352,"score_spread":0.19029336285582021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1831783994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03220432,0.045382023,0.1281751,0.1692758,0.0031476899,0.000056745634,0.0002604796,0.00016432597,0.62133354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9009388,0.007047897,0.028793028,0.008492464,0.0023629752,0.00017044162,0.0000896699,0.00017743571,0.051927123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960193,0.0024931335,0.00014048223,0.00060029124,0.0005551707,0.00019160872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935616,0.0048128883,0.0001989589,0.000718336,0.0005467529,0.00016145005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050367634,0.0006165072,0.0010788399,0.0017787954,0.0042286147,0.0064276275,0.0011684379,0.0037101298,0.007053285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014736061,0.00058703223,0.00096941344,0.0012348437,0.020296652,0.013755524,0.0031332313,0.007239608,0.0011610255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004575041,0.0000024880997,0.000024859663,0.000010859201,0.000002182115,0.000008786136,0.00012439732,0.00008215053,0.000013200048,0.99790263,0.0010308963,0.00079303375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024379583,0.0000010890711,0.000009220311,0.0000092262135,9.054222e-7,0.000008877714,0.000036401434,0.00013013746,0.000012478626,0.9953827,0.004404513,0.000001968622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022716627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023629349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007053285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003964917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017004343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028767586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1850974401","doi":"10.1111/papq.12092","title":"Is Understanding Epistemic in Nature?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Skepticism; Articulation (sociology); Philosophy; Focus (optics); Rationality; Order (exchange); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.1963590482312692,"score_gpt":0.30964752311100197,"score_spread":0.11328847487973276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1850974401","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04427634,0.019337008,0.06787084,0.5200787,0.0024479635,0.00005289744,0.00014274385,0.00011213008,0.34568134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716787,0.006028409,0.004273592,0.0114254905,0.0013483532,0.00006173514,0.00005730383,0.000048530277,0.0050780466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99144167,0.0056936005,0.00024052139,0.00084536383,0.0013291832,0.00044965665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827692,0.011724721,0.0012061946,0.0014320282,0.0020724258,0.00079543394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013291456,0.0004224835,0.0009483656,0.0024653033,0.0051099313,0.01369776,0.0014485664,0.005004319,0.0042814864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016936652,0.0002761932,0.0005218628,0.002207163,0.06747151,0.024082715,0.0045656543,0.0067411507,0.0005856139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073790325,0.00000795903,0.000100642224,0.00003974626,0.000004697776,0.0000349513,0.00399691,0.000108803484,0.000047484424,0.99197185,0.0015957205,0.0020838743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019260488,0.0000031266018,0.00007448035,0.00011073054,0.000004249539,0.000026220418,0.001995749,0.00015836615,0.000057592988,0.9810961,0.016466405,0.00000507037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033117915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014650046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01369776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053328048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058108866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07029283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1869766104","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2011.01416.x","title":"HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT ‘HOW DO YOU KNOW?’ CHALLENGES A SPEAKER'S KNOWLEDGE?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Need to know; Psychology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.09897644136040398,"score_gpt":0.27387017781486467,"score_spread":0.17489373645446069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1869766104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.442512,0.0020201292,0.060243145,0.14807762,0.0013596726,0.00007582224,0.0004797383,0.00010884853,0.34512308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948336,0.00023798832,0.0011988846,0.0019545301,0.00018405121,0.00002113655,0.00004429129,0.00002916955,0.0014963187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9725627,0.016764795,0.0013166182,0.002455076,0.005894262,0.0010065762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8829488,0.09158385,0.007963445,0.008755488,0.0075709233,0.0011774984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024677848,0.00031947394,0.00080177793,0.0013271859,0.003810253,0.008877953,0.0016251674,0.0051108506,0.006955715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078468405,0.0004219454,0.00039847186,0.0013936602,0.038096096,0.021324767,0.006068769,0.008622752,0.0009485648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015415193,0.0000629821,0.0038870163,0.00035408637,0.000045938188,0.00061173283,0.22672476,0.0002797771,0.0017265737,0.75098014,0.00393126,0.01124152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002562252,0.000063083375,0.004345124,0.0009389312,0.0000593767,0.0005877183,0.2305065,0.0015786414,0.004015882,0.68186516,0.07591121,0.00010282323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030439212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016314021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024677848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002361361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024817868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13051045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1876167642","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2015.24238","title":"Knowing is not Enough","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Nursing; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.43147896142138664,"score_gpt":0.341432849274697,"score_spread":0.09004611214668962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1876167642","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025206018,0.022134151,0.00018639122,0.18635853,0.78845835,0.000005827545,0.000015605763,0.000026222668,0.0027897812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015389274,0.017030668,0.0002254643,0.1559052,0.8144616,0.00003209187,0.000019334051,0.00005924084,0.010727536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771319,0.009219247,0.0017647691,0.0021295135,0.008905722,0.0008489484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8974386,0.07805328,0.002780649,0.0025738366,0.014300204,0.0048533804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022443298,0.003060222,0.0047065564,0.004608299,0.009824372,0.023455663,0.004843001,0.025595868,0.009151177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07801267,0.0013582736,0.002180357,0.0020355773,0.02488477,0.016729048,0.0054283226,0.06614984,0.00623288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012117876,0.0000131446,0.000018794792,0.00034574996,0.000024606483,0.00005439667,0.0002959771,0.000025936193,0.000017813245,0.009831584,0.9828872,0.006472764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015838634,0.000009801118,0.000079546284,0.0014117393,0.000032129214,0.00009818553,0.0007658768,0.00007184133,0.000040923296,0.018550023,0.97889817,0.00002588126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053428025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0140524255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025595868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071368124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01315442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118692875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1881342488","doi":"","title":"Building an Island of Rationality around the Concept ofDifferentiation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Sociology; Geography; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.048073449111700466,"score_gpt":0.2964235119549421,"score_spread":0.24835006284324163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1881342488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051560182,0.011691594,0.248599,0.1096707,0.0014966984,0.000086752545,0.00017921404,0.00030759766,0.5764083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9431346,0.0018960277,0.035678186,0.003049582,0.00039001496,0.00010116946,0.000061669445,0.00024574157,0.01544301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99147874,0.005024912,0.00029640252,0.0010714802,0.0013435003,0.0007849388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867269,0.0075344597,0.0005120001,0.0028546506,0.0016315163,0.0007404919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013921913,0.00066876353,0.0013876593,0.0033750003,0.008153013,0.013585678,0.002995643,0.0038193003,0.007863999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015168571,0.00071498164,0.0008827476,0.0025802942,0.110122964,0.020070437,0.01145258,0.011586839,0.0009040845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046985433,0.0000024094952,0.000039794628,0.00000565404,0.0000012177144,0.0000050418303,0.00088561216,0.00006408446,0.000020844303,0.9973515,0.00019603843,0.0014231997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006923833,0.000003869987,0.00006370883,0.000025869453,0.000001964055,0.000010574019,0.0006129834,0.0002537542,0.000060062353,0.9884476,0.010505355,0.0000073254496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0359851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027654957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0359851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009962845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015530686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073626995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1894958704","doi":"10.1007/s11406-015-9655-x","title":"Understanding and the Norm of Explanation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of mind; Introspection; Philosophy of language; Epistemology; Norm (philosophy); Speech act; Psychology; Metaphysics; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.5850479768524158,"score_gpt":0.2990073746570184,"score_spread":0.28604060219539745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1894958704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05894722,0.0134698525,0.23206653,0.29686958,0.0017239522,0.00012607478,0.00034240627,0.00026300485,0.3961914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573169,0.0012859966,0.026071377,0.0077846553,0.001090946,0.00032005523,0.00011926572,0.00012530736,0.0058854427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9437807,0.041471027,0.0022985893,0.005695056,0.0051764473,0.00157808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8932618,0.080436766,0.004341173,0.0146561125,0.0056471517,0.0016569939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05262637,0.0006662859,0.0023342895,0.0031728817,0.0067648184,0.015648974,0.0030440239,0.010023123,0.004231704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07682929,0.00089147023,0.0011859671,0.0016306567,0.08773538,0.023872014,0.006708043,0.011420848,0.0006541995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007898133,0.000004296975,0.000088539164,0.000014321271,0.0000043722002,0.000005623737,0.00044993756,0.00012552514,0.000015994368,0.9978662,0.00044695713,0.00097034214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008216476,0.0000018382564,0.000032500237,0.000016445472,0.0000018658466,0.0000058358414,0.000115848416,0.00018660833,0.000026873764,0.9975432,0.0020574767,0.0000033742806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003966714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002186393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05262637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005939819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008678475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27831817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1896317508","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00625.x","title":"Précis of <i>Knowledge in an Uncertain World</i>","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Adventure; Politics; Sociology; Library science; Art history; Law; Computer science; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.5146541832854877,"score_gpt":0.45284365521136877,"score_spread":0.061810528074118964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1896317508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06494569,0.013239726,0.11331396,0.1325218,0.0018932649,0.00021969022,0.00047607702,0.00012032706,0.67326945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97149336,0.0021727218,0.009799866,0.0052098096,0.00070109725,0.00015254697,0.00012487025,0.0000628062,0.010282844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99056107,0.005292224,0.00053216115,0.0011640707,0.0018049761,0.0006453825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790228,0.012132228,0.001906388,0.003986101,0.0021427926,0.0008096341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009711599,0.00047052043,0.0007501085,0.002601653,0.00968388,0.022030745,0.002158838,0.005678824,0.0054530054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017974498,0.00063166925,0.00077104376,0.0024976507,0.08995631,0.028292201,0.0070652873,0.008541988,0.00089225976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015665823,0.00000713076,0.00020398218,0.00008210104,0.000009528625,0.00010556561,0.011275639,0.00015225474,0.00009533138,0.9836205,0.0014942354,0.0029380675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053743247,0.000010924943,0.0002653126,0.00018809068,0.000008777718,0.00017623894,0.009618385,0.0003361421,0.00025361663,0.95886385,0.030254675,0.000018491033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004650446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00393888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022030745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070897792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007403031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05144018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189894983","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-5934-3_1","title":"Virtue, Intuition, and Philosophical Methodology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Virtue; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.21333593330484107,"score_gpt":0.3023210647752008,"score_spread":0.08898513147035975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189894983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011473972,0.049731735,0.0713919,0.03392499,0.0010123997,0.00005302718,0.0001370172,0.00012340906,0.8321515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8665336,0.016339164,0.03231573,0.005894099,0.0020565167,0.00028620852,0.00015990026,0.00017242889,0.07624253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963117,0.0023789913,0.0001300551,0.00029513345,0.0007060075,0.00017808953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943299,0.004436739,0.0001866188,0.0005443655,0.0003682541,0.00013405381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005558685,0.00055882393,0.0008538915,0.0018726848,0.00269996,0.007866172,0.0012935257,0.00295286,0.00683114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008151544,0.00043814746,0.0005199708,0.0017296079,0.03406619,0.009332271,0.0022942743,0.0049747247,0.0010283887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017667859,0.0000041435833,0.00002341349,0.000018960116,0.0000012645279,0.0000038012884,0.0002503806,0.0000581656,0.000010668351,0.99679023,0.0011274625,0.0017096414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018819751,0.0000014605266,0.00004041801,0.000028729293,6.951571e-7,0.00000976536,0.00011698485,0.00013022096,0.000016014768,0.9911651,0.008486911,0.0000018683822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023062506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024107965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007866172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037762402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003395444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029397488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1908302690","doi":"10.1111/rati.12097","title":"Epistemic Value Monism and the Swamping Problem","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Epistemology; Premise; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08529585516567487,"score_gpt":0.26259036325555307,"score_spread":0.1772945080898782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1908302690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06857009,0.005277765,0.38792685,0.10518225,0.0011805431,0.00013151091,0.00016059897,0.0005372007,0.43103322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97312784,0.0005118754,0.015527441,0.0027842366,0.00059033564,0.000104280756,0.000025406282,0.00013901999,0.007189562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98313737,0.00879736,0.0008532033,0.0023327183,0.003667841,0.0012114963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95959336,0.027587581,0.0018750575,0.006766252,0.0032375988,0.00094009505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017614856,0.00078671216,0.0015500424,0.0032173037,0.004918467,0.008808869,0.0028205696,0.0057056206,0.011009521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045916945,0.0010879526,0.001453177,0.0018859986,0.04418009,0.02400051,0.012191416,0.01214201,0.0011133421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072155763,0.0000037968446,0.000034207922,0.0000149785365,0.000004324792,0.000022935516,0.00018485312,0.000101354344,0.000032947264,0.9979177,0.0003132043,0.0013624394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000588901,0.0000029420225,0.000019378129,0.000018531098,0.000003279263,0.000031942494,0.000058375812,0.0005084775,0.000083285944,0.99699163,0.0022729135,0.0000032660016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019369251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011068507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017614856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006467211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027144097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09315735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910537218","doi":"10.1111/meta.12107","title":"You Make Your Own Luck","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Luck; Counterfactual thinking; Causation; Epistemology; Positive economics; Metaphysics; Psychology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.08191204937160894,"score_gpt":0.26948065994830483,"score_spread":0.18756861057669588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1910537218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042913314,0.00462272,0.02647395,0.15415427,0.004171531,0.000058532198,0.00015503241,0.0003340418,0.7671165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8210304,0.0021426762,0.0033910424,0.019011104,0.0011115136,0.00006743429,0.00008290131,0.00025462132,0.15290833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943039,0.0030671563,0.0001545873,0.0005410152,0.0013182809,0.0006150421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945661,0.0018171875,0.0006217211,0.000829657,0.0012513107,0.0009140756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00402978,0.0004660155,0.0003686938,0.00063026114,0.003821834,0.0071454505,0.00073797547,0.0023137927,0.01588701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011578132,0.00023282043,0.00037652516,0.00035751163,0.017594323,0.006529353,0.0042204186,0.005226183,0.006246019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042648815,0.000052597297,0.0016822349,0.00011569977,0.00003300545,0.00035501417,0.01547724,0.00032028643,0.0005250731,0.8889812,0.06486145,0.027553549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014737803,0.00008241547,0.0014347102,0.00044595488,0.00002597516,0.000511292,0.00968514,0.0005135262,0.0013449307,0.3193869,0.66649616,0.000058274247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011358929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011955753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01588701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022823536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001545877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053147376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1920291627","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511732270.003","title":"Could integrity be an epistemic virtue?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Content (measure theory); Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09334157844013001,"score_gpt":0.23796208287209866,"score_spread":0.14462050443196867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1920291627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024499537,0.011818765,0.013198907,0.061563376,0.0014548548,0.000018985254,0.00009198447,0.00006493034,0.90933824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55508035,0.021400006,0.009423423,0.025842294,0.0045730863,0.00019381818,0.00022111881,0.0003643405,0.38290158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802125,0.000972324,0.00006296289,0.00025968687,0.00043704658,0.00024678372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975898,0.0014886364,0.00011852795,0.0003482697,0.0003232548,0.00013153824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035698272,0.00043717126,0.00050710794,0.00078756275,0.0031074407,0.0075031198,0.0009456434,0.0040516797,0.017736431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006319974,0.00029035704,0.00053125387,0.0008356328,0.023197865,0.013780342,0.0029867839,0.005892504,0.0052090315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003382902,0.000001612759,0.000017526956,0.000020271162,8.328623e-7,0.000017514943,0.0004373271,0.000018492887,0.000021160286,0.9888101,0.007899224,0.0027525553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030161737,0.0000049638934,0.00008093332,0.00017925916,0.0000030608064,0.00009042483,0.00059317495,0.000081709324,0.00012493414,0.84349716,0.15533493,0.0000064633355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014275768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018898452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017736431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028494422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002741574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059334278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1921503942","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00469.x","title":"Can We Be Self‐Deceived about What We Believe? Self‐Knowledge, Self‐Deception, and Rational Agency","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Self-deception; Order (exchange); Relation (database); Self-knowledge; Epistemology; Content (measure theory); Social psychology; Psychology; Self; Common knowledge (logic); Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09298263487289923,"score_gpt":0.2563550489335183,"score_spread":0.16337241406061906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1921503942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3820147,0.009472437,0.07835999,0.16500501,0.00065309205,0.00006573426,0.000118493874,0.000120036064,0.3641905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99569714,0.000458741,0.0012160616,0.0010489961,0.00004042158,0.000010205848,0.000010024709,0.0000053723215,0.0015128574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937028,0.0039772866,0.00022757579,0.00059992523,0.0010084175,0.00048389522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761189,0.014450017,0.0036568865,0.0030497138,0.0021117239,0.0006126755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007324283,0.0003119971,0.00047949693,0.0009022532,0.0021384472,0.0053097866,0.0009469706,0.004908938,0.003145752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027368689,0.00026415146,0.00048090584,0.0006269018,0.024878396,0.0087308,0.0028039534,0.0051917518,0.00041489355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075742064,0.0000544883,0.0030471422,0.00007650199,0.00005253599,0.0008423433,0.011470535,0.0015439612,0.00027482247,0.9682424,0.0026055328,0.011714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016452792,0.000020264473,0.0010420707,0.00008227566,0.000016650703,0.00037959055,0.0029249298,0.0028300998,0.00036921565,0.9817394,0.010553258,0.00002589753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027807106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015059435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007324283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021980216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011247194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038734972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924137967","doi":"10.1111/nous.12017","title":"Knowledge, Stakes, and Mistakes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Noûs","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.0880633502216077,"score_gpt":0.26448848871069974,"score_spread":0.17642513848909203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924137967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8037156,0.0032415611,0.03265385,0.026532123,0.00016347361,0.0000762916,0.00024023223,0.000073410345,0.1333035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985518,0.00019601845,0.00048155943,0.00021852844,0.000027821961,0.0000078319945,0.000011883129,0.00000899686,0.0004955565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9802366,0.010814531,0.0010470513,0.0016664757,0.0050041233,0.0012312479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8405933,0.11103642,0.02571665,0.011392711,0.006881431,0.004379676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017662225,0.00033907188,0.00053889473,0.0021130976,0.0014471166,0.00711914,0.0007051838,0.002199095,0.004372519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13691922,0.00046715568,0.00033834792,0.00120543,0.020861538,0.012603129,0.0050866907,0.0033783813,0.0005014385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005135406,0.0003016335,0.24378633,0.0002931598,0.00037424546,0.00093950494,0.03994122,0.005358907,0.0011320354,0.6475183,0.0025519584,0.057289165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004761108,0.00013443809,0.07935141,0.00032593333,0.00007550266,0.0006114325,0.012853705,0.0031388062,0.0011705658,0.89478254,0.0074140173,0.00009406563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013260854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093529274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017662225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020755364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010156981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09340793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19262010","doi":"10.1007/978-94-010-0013-0_13","title":"The Dialectical Illusion of a Vicious Bootstrap","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Coherentism; Appeal; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Dialectic; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Philosophy; Illusion; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09554469878600108,"score_gpt":0.2689426364004918,"score_spread":0.17339793761449074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W19262010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031108184,0.006748678,0.18517037,0.13019311,0.0014305044,0.00013522814,0.00011819118,0.0002543685,0.6448413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93441254,0.0013257312,0.030488918,0.007734426,0.0006883564,0.00034829622,0.000048198657,0.00032270877,0.024630858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836268,0.012039279,0.00029170423,0.0015330696,0.0019696958,0.00053942925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831986,0.011483424,0.00047374392,0.0029497035,0.0012994158,0.00059510855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015016462,0.0006197303,0.0010935616,0.0021039494,0.0073902146,0.012106509,0.002454167,0.0073578563,0.007513073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029803617,0.0007302827,0.0006399095,0.0011793554,0.08245511,0.02495683,0.007925458,0.011571052,0.0014579737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003185106,0.0000026115201,0.000012178848,0.000006203854,0.0000014061275,0.000008221671,0.000863121,0.00004921922,0.000021113741,0.9981396,0.00038753703,0.0005055662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000637795,0.0000017114578,0.000012168404,0.000021719043,0.0000012171056,0.000011632619,0.00043176158,0.0002242831,0.000041591284,0.9914526,0.007791958,0.0000030939407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018798977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016970864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015016462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059745987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060529127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07941562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1937457939","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i2.2578","title":"Reasoning Under Uncertainty: The Role of Two Informal Fallacies in an Emerging Scientific Inquiry","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Epistemology; Heuristics; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Function (biology); Argumentation theory; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.12100827948780749,"score_gpt":0.30743743939493345,"score_spread":0.18642915990712597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1937457939","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18444498,0.0031743862,0.6104467,0.037611663,0.00043104505,0.0004467343,0.00010633601,0.0004975252,0.16284068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9162678,0.0004254168,0.07948253,0.0006890343,0.000087760585,0.0002886057,0.000047904323,0.000083781124,0.0026272058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9726078,0.018341817,0.0013650889,0.0020459886,0.0041348673,0.0015043534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9417586,0.042099353,0.0041725603,0.0060989847,0.0036785195,0.0021919217],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023877751,0.00075534516,0.0012159137,0.006181631,0.008500529,0.018234335,0.0028311051,0.005328666,0.0036489465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061991498,0.00085697504,0.0011628623,0.0033710762,0.074648045,0.031267446,0.014373173,0.007560357,0.00046743007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018663199,0.000017030496,0.00054364617,0.000045454126,0.000005772961,0.00014206224,0.01832153,0.00031474783,0.00014397019,0.97487426,0.000215357,0.0053575295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009281885,0.000012324523,0.0002072329,0.00006983376,0.0000058260575,0.00008757187,0.005173752,0.0014641855,0.00011563467,0.9881605,0.004681724,0.000012183028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027073014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026010394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9914995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063922624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005903335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12627918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963816739","doi":"10.1002/bies.201200182","title":"When peers are not peers and don't know it: The Dunning‐Kruger effect and self‐fulfilling prophecy in peer‐review","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BioEssays","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Subconscious; Objectivity (philosophy); Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Medicine","score_opus":0.04089134716365799,"score_gpt":0.2649940997960596,"score_spread":0.2241027526324016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963816739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3142981,0.009309291,0.09025834,0.19770339,0.0018993015,0.00023834371,0.0001300134,0.0003699667,0.38579336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989402,0.0006217409,0.0038809525,0.0017092632,0.00036341764,0.000077466866,0.000009099636,0.000058019883,0.0038780952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9454499,0.03691063,0.0011955076,0.0036987483,0.011187722,0.0015575786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7761633,0.16422738,0.020346873,0.020819355,0.014391778,0.0040513105],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04889952,0.00028824044,0.00073512574,0.0022157633,0.0060318667,0.009193316,0.0016601906,0.004124156,0.00461627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1869475,0.00053942617,0.00035284858,0.0016924767,0.04232753,0.015284005,0.00620962,0.0037150083,0.0009167861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008980892,0.000039607778,0.0031163024,0.00014839687,0.000044169195,0.0004644588,0.018125283,0.00063676987,0.0004608002,0.94264305,0.005856512,0.028374905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096001226,0.000062793166,0.0035244492,0.00015231676,0.000034321267,0.00051456224,0.0049464446,0.0021818036,0.0009162673,0.96078,0.026706643,0.000084349624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022943376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021850606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95110047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043541035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051190522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25860846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966971714","doi":"10.1177/0191453706059845","title":"On the public use of practical reason","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Legitimacy; Epistemology; Public reason; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Variety (cybernetics); Cornerstone; Deliberation; Generalizability theory; Politics; Deliberative democracy; Law and economics; Democracy; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.24450179181631218,"score_gpt":0.3236907243889362,"score_spread":0.07918893257262402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966971714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03501451,0.008848792,0.07125812,0.24026771,0.00094857387,0.0000682205,0.00006966495,0.0002289399,0.64329547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741358,0.001717249,0.0056623956,0.0075007826,0.00077663496,0.00010329054,0.000027574119,0.00012565825,0.009950555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9622229,0.027374085,0.0008286323,0.0024669797,0.005219636,0.0018877093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9451349,0.043308176,0.0020358267,0.005684087,0.0030754725,0.0007614706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03331318,0.000530853,0.0009318894,0.0026909155,0.00952066,0.018595887,0.0023103335,0.010424352,0.005004511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03835128,0.0004981967,0.0010188285,0.002008768,0.089957714,0.021061052,0.008725964,0.010752257,0.0010094773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029682774,0.0000037338136,0.00003738904,0.000010177832,0.0000020075754,0.00001626163,0.001381645,0.000094164345,0.000014820807,0.9965564,0.0007529779,0.0011274565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062782265,0.00000437846,0.000049453716,0.000055887787,0.0000030984243,0.000020980298,0.0008339845,0.00028582104,0.000060598777,0.98021436,0.018459463,0.000005655086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024575186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016961746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03331318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009662273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006448949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17617905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967032030","doi":"10.3138/tjt.1993","title":"Theology and Rationality: Some Conceptual and Epistemic Remarks","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Virtue; Duty; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Principal (computer security); Sociology; Expression (computer science); Philosophy; Computer science; Theology; Economics","score_opus":0.03349980824642458,"score_gpt":0.2610466418696843,"score_spread":0.22754683362325973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967032030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03348013,0.013128512,0.1006875,0.36903432,0.0026513047,0.000101068435,0.0001831094,0.00016863875,0.4805655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95096,0.0037525932,0.014769834,0.01236067,0.0030804577,0.00022734153,0.000071654176,0.00008174903,0.014695677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992859,0.004778641,0.00021806064,0.00046560503,0.001260456,0.0004182297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98805594,0.009068894,0.00054947054,0.00078118383,0.0011026439,0.00044190043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010687106,0.00069001055,0.000687591,0.003271192,0.0053860387,0.008949015,0.00286354,0.008209496,0.008472447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011978421,0.0005179099,0.0010358054,0.0023830961,0.049504768,0.0120448265,0.006539157,0.009487541,0.000873294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002640864,0.0000033165516,0.00001376836,0.000009172291,8.742596e-7,0.00002267725,0.00038408538,0.000086700784,0.000011162788,0.9987037,0.0004968446,0.00026506037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000910506,0.0000037146767,0.00004769614,0.000039954786,0.0000026508003,0.00002301809,0.0005568005,0.0005675686,0.000039870018,0.9890321,0.009671701,0.0000057539028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054339487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034065587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010687106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007682666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031470754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05651951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969509720","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v1i1.2972","title":"Experts, Evidence, and Epistemic Independence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Western Washington University; University of Washington","keywords":"Epistemology; Intellect; Autonomy; Proposition; Rationality; Empirical evidence; Irrational number; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12328303810701075,"score_gpt":0.29683321272867147,"score_spread":0.17355017462166072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969509720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06789586,0.01509953,0.1021949,0.102109455,0.0006741034,0.00013274567,0.0003162793,0.00012055627,0.7114566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648222,0.002768644,0.011735721,0.005365848,0.0008931211,0.00013624453,0.00009446766,0.000035533918,0.014148153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856651,0.0067972946,0.00081480376,0.0023792794,0.0032664808,0.0010770642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96165866,0.028663639,0.0020526466,0.0035889652,0.0027758458,0.0012602702],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020144047,0.0005913475,0.0010520899,0.003165675,0.004080755,0.0073372885,0.001866074,0.004477304,0.006126386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031745218,0.0006928272,0.00079716236,0.0015547089,0.040718965,0.016916396,0.009146534,0.009267558,0.0005760709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001082204,0.0000055576234,0.00016456512,0.00002144479,0.000006526036,0.000036722944,0.0006115821,0.00013567996,0.000021461343,0.9964395,0.0006149496,0.0019310577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013640187,0.0000039597694,0.00017667419,0.000040282444,0.000006969949,0.000027858827,0.00016163134,0.0002441743,0.000045429148,0.9929229,0.006349132,0.0000074189484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004087361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029048147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046180296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032268218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10653317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969780184","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2929.2007.02724.x","title":"Effect size enhancement on McLeod's test of tacit knowledge","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Medical Education","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Citation; Library science; Test (biology); Visitor pattern; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.026034046117666913,"score_gpt":0.33005500905447127,"score_spread":0.30402096293680436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969780184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6364623,0.006615146,0.103526145,0.09512566,0.01257467,0.005442491,0.006397861,0.001600812,0.13225496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9339312,0.00028064582,0.03378275,0.015658086,0.0012289494,0.002688785,0.0004068865,0.00039507262,0.011627627],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.82571405,0.13487114,0.0069893845,0.01331299,0.017642297,0.0014700952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.17055261,0.7971378,0.0071814167,0.017359616,0.006027932,0.0017405766],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09613724,0.0011726868,0.0026898459,0.0031610439,0.002167981,0.0027741073,0.0038204344,0.0072209127,0.03248656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48640186,0.000570503,0.0043901266,0.00202327,0.0076411967,0.0063966373,0.0033261122,0.005094071,0.0021793428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.185677,0.0041212193,0.14977452,0.004623437,0.020849839,0.0074850908,0.008646371,0.0049966727,0.021787774,0.10303213,0.096856944,0.39214906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0362142,0.037940323,0.4831269,0.0014838076,0.01680946,0.007062312,0.0051714703,0.040690325,0.038514514,0.25245515,0.07956135,0.0009701927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016300094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020140996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9038628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017046568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019255586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5084284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971338664","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.00004.x","title":"An Introduction to Philosophical Methods. By ChrisDaly. (Toronto: Broadview, 2010. Pp. 257. US$32.95.)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Media studies; Art history; Library science; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.07592193641619185,"score_gpt":0.3191050254458789,"score_spread":0.24318308902968702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971338664","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027689873,0.6554275,0.01566775,0.07443484,0.008779974,0.0001336474,0.0026501217,0.0014303275,0.24119882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004543331,0.3137431,0.0143226115,0.012852521,0.0053538475,0.00028738487,0.0018332575,0.0013836023,0.64568037],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998389,0.00040258368,0.00015593176,0.0001644157,0.0007902264,0.00009778698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624145,0.002161889,0.00022313393,0.00019121074,0.00078646163,0.00039583264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023016264,0.002386022,0.0012765487,0.0038929472,0.0017448209,0.0032882972,0.0012888089,0.0026682483,0.24215378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044704336,0.0019933935,0.00095709285,0.005479989,0.0026688892,0.008763761,0.0028464252,0.005633077,0.13711001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007733382,0.0000075867847,0.000043119355,0.00037903097,0.000005171306,0.000027827049,0.00030312705,0.00006551082,0.0001077227,0.005821949,0.9371098,0.05612138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026783296,0.0000043039854,0.00024227865,0.00038795077,0.0000023860823,0.00007086114,0.00014320025,0.000030352076,0.000025751953,0.0054986277,0.9935847,0.0000069231824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03192806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.089745075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24215378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047796047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004909315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81008506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973116765","doi":"10.1162/posc_a_00127","title":"On the Origins of the Philosophy of Thought Experiments: The Forerun","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Parallels; Epistemology; Period (music); Subject (documents); Philosophy; Philosophy of history; Order (exchange); Thought experiment; Aesthetics; Computer science; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.08000198462229284,"score_gpt":0.3050809371873372,"score_spread":0.22507895256504434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973116765","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038681276,0.17530622,0.09173202,0.382061,0.0032977199,0.00015457495,0.00015585922,0.00019799267,0.30841327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8981153,0.041470084,0.025040653,0.018272027,0.0031274126,0.00042308017,0.000054765078,0.00022793053,0.013268738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97522473,0.020001672,0.00041750545,0.0014594751,0.0023713782,0.00052524195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9092324,0.081204794,0.0016451394,0.0047849496,0.002013684,0.0011191114],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03516693,0.000557766,0.0011289396,0.0033637227,0.0060350182,0.015175438,0.0014858341,0.0077869855,0.0047733984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028160548,0.00079748954,0.00057835464,0.0028489882,0.111080825,0.02617001,0.0066070845,0.011866912,0.0006741658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014877556,0.0000073602614,0.000056111712,0.00005046157,0.0000020265463,0.000009429039,0.0016630196,0.000071408045,0.000036732617,0.99275947,0.0005741301,0.004754885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014705338,0.000015419044,0.00013222983,0.0002525725,0.000002630221,0.000023941846,0.0010125277,0.00019342112,0.000096512784,0.9636418,0.034605063,0.000009251316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014776841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001328517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99396497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010101833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006734759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18598276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975946204","doi":"10.1007/s11229-010-9773-8","title":"Is knowledge justified true belief?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Point (geometry); Philosophy of mind; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07907218540409477,"score_gpt":0.30288243207220483,"score_spread":0.22381024666811006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975946204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038134314,0.03344108,0.10799095,0.35490495,0.0045232247,0.00012386682,0.0009969156,0.00019712528,0.45968753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95259565,0.008204176,0.019547595,0.008208196,0.0024680998,0.00018943574,0.0003529541,0.00009541611,0.008338501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98958546,0.007085797,0.0004271524,0.0010940405,0.001397832,0.00040978656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92302316,0.061506588,0.003186954,0.0066234083,0.004968089,0.0006917581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013694172,0.00066586665,0.0013609403,0.0039452645,0.002944842,0.009772227,0.002473429,0.0068293507,0.016042968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06212018,0.0006466632,0.0005509647,0.0029873874,0.03452668,0.02168675,0.0028128268,0.0053484156,0.0021004495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014859642,0.000009351216,0.000089853354,0.00012092728,0.000015909261,0.00003310773,0.0010296116,0.00011071995,0.00002118503,0.9931512,0.0018034237,0.0035997308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010649689,0.000003454475,0.00009602552,0.00022980625,0.000010206731,0.000027456048,0.0010788464,0.00027325246,0.00007914898,0.9873115,0.01087468,0.0000050303215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022308081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016774334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016042968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005548228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005570556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072422564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976545681","doi":"10.1017/epi.2014.14","title":"EPISTEMIC CIRCULARITY, RELIABILISM, AND TRANSMISSION FAILURE","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Legitimacy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.025876716604097065,"score_gpt":0.22793908531024548,"score_spread":0.2020623687061484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976545681","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17238814,0.0061025717,0.43733948,0.11652701,0.0013675208,0.00026638267,0.00032817287,0.00068409625,0.26499644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817816,0.00069574063,0.01098508,0.0016667943,0.00052844494,0.00014872532,0.00005910324,0.0000934562,0.004041137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97761613,0.013065944,0.0011979509,0.0024213505,0.004362136,0.001336563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8213645,0.14383899,0.008628672,0.014487114,0.009543836,0.002136874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026619473,0.0006706224,0.0013189531,0.0037374028,0.0046997974,0.0077776294,0.002811213,0.006958383,0.008428131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085914195,0.0008395175,0.0014779775,0.0022878663,0.040639546,0.01563476,0.010920885,0.010266989,0.0009854311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001966612,0.00001462371,0.00022891043,0.000050219056,0.000015404526,0.0001173707,0.00079606636,0.00058710505,0.00007235055,0.99516666,0.00090069923,0.002030952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013099087,0.0000058711603,0.00005487724,0.000041839397,0.0000073600054,0.00004368724,0.00010039114,0.0010611779,0.00012426492,0.99669206,0.001845892,0.000009476868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018953984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082922215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026619473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005780797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003058916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14077896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977467634","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2013.05.009","title":"Taking ‘know’ for an answer: A reply to Nagel, San Juan, and Mar","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Humanities; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09762473502353419,"score_gpt":0.30004801333688175,"score_spread":0.20242327831334755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977467634","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018183308,0.0025845035,0.00020594957,0.99341726,0.0025612647,0.0000016955851,0.00000960521,0.0000064035407,0.0010314954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015089327,0.0029114299,0.0006737043,0.96657205,0.012182422,0.000033969685,0.0000209526,0.00008221704,0.0024339866],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98805654,0.0067523527,0.0006656066,0.0018596483,0.001979729,0.00068608223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9050458,0.07553127,0.0028167013,0.0026865364,0.011117346,0.0028024656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021460671,0.0012919336,0.0029129414,0.0020269318,0.012919681,0.015446742,0.005631747,0.051588655,0.009008667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.083265565,0.0010067918,0.0011407661,0.0029874016,0.035925236,0.026678497,0.009672176,0.07717013,0.0051963124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058091147,0.000030003366,0.00024860064,0.00016333883,0.000038563387,0.000152057,0.009860207,0.00007211773,0.00006403075,0.13557327,0.8472583,0.006481454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011214396,0.000019682771,0.00067790836,0.0013675005,0.000052755116,0.0003114026,0.02100473,0.0003449537,0.0002929422,0.30165863,0.6740165,0.00014082555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015137864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016803702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051588655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068023107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01086506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113496184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982432424","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9224-9","title":"Character and Knowledge: Learning from the Speech of Experts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Pathos; Ethos; Character (mathematics); Logos Bible Software; Epistemology; Psychology; Social knowledge; Sociology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13704088616481985,"score_gpt":0.2752474300216571,"score_spread":0.13820654385683723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982432424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.652963,0.0024769735,0.17110796,0.019095665,0.00034862218,0.00019234723,0.0004062271,0.00024710008,0.15316212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822015,0.00048851914,0.012086243,0.00035784562,0.00008243128,0.00006457179,0.00023115933,0.000049851456,0.004437842],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887388,0.00900447,0.00022934946,0.0007602374,0.0009816702,0.00028549702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89719766,0.091938145,0.0024924674,0.0037342734,0.003331615,0.0013057801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0108985845,0.0005947616,0.00052990357,0.0017406539,0.00206646,0.009551718,0.0015064649,0.0036723432,0.0067250654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10214507,0.0003762661,0.00037239073,0.0010198515,0.0070884097,0.017718654,0.004683029,0.0037078762,0.0012825956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008471703,0.00050069694,0.031498786,0.00088838505,0.00012453234,0.0014247106,0.34404674,0.00537562,0.0032855726,0.32454866,0.010482627,0.27697653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007262164,0.00018742098,0.01132349,0.00089895393,0.000059155896,0.00060841895,0.09590506,0.029557724,0.0034640892,0.8098719,0.047945764,0.00010536842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011613009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012416082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0108985845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014100604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014213726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05763793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983036506","doi":"10.1167/12.9.33","title":"Judging faces on trustworthiness and emotions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vision","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Psychology; Trustworthiness; Social psychology; Anger; Valence (chemistry); Face (sociological concept); Face perception; Dominance (genetics); Cognitive psychology; Perception","score_opus":0.0617752597605914,"score_gpt":0.313952061054982,"score_spread":0.25217680129439063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983036506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9608716,0.00023469786,0.0052448544,0.00013665739,0.000035134122,0.00006041006,0.00009114124,0.000025581643,0.033299845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964127,0.00015080531,0.002437971,0.000048345282,0.00002672183,0.000033626624,0.000082337225,0.00002254973,0.0007849015],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978644,0.0007574133,0.00013298253,0.00028236426,0.0008392632,0.00012361632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98041683,0.012230707,0.0028505153,0.0011893872,0.0027259197,0.0005867545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028030283,0.00038026823,0.00038456073,0.0015799617,0.00062884064,0.001561712,0.00031238672,0.00058101106,0.005893739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027361104,0.00021370774,0.00033622442,0.0006851397,0.0014955549,0.0021370375,0.0020099585,0.0008822595,0.00047151133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041080485,0.0006133605,0.43755236,0.000993364,0.00053754065,0.0011064637,0.04452472,0.004812639,0.16039656,0.030823885,0.0033116809,0.31121936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003654264,0.0005871766,0.96042746,0.00012636563,0.00009558493,0.000491974,0.00643762,0.0051800595,0.008678596,0.01592032,0.0019043349,0.000113890084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020017743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016284488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005893739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058098754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023825007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019716501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987355271","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00007.x","title":"Epistemic Side Constraints and the Structure of Epistemic Normativity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Rationality; Constraint (computer-aided design); Order (exchange); Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics; Economics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.023699987076120508,"score_gpt":0.22233272757256536,"score_spread":0.19863274049644486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987355271","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05978231,0.00091257837,0.5849089,0.01051729,0.00041717416,0.00011945459,0.00018154543,0.00018494399,0.34297574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93062943,0.00040979098,0.059147257,0.0010476721,0.00032057465,0.00028121416,0.00011905608,0.00010225068,0.007942748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98817676,0.006617328,0.00060436793,0.0012726024,0.0026030245,0.00072591717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98425806,0.0088990405,0.0012120395,0.0025783547,0.0024128202,0.00063969084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009499939,0.0005059699,0.0007826411,0.001445649,0.0034690385,0.0060031833,0.0014366255,0.002671095,0.0060630054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014422711,0.00054055284,0.0008207071,0.0013333306,0.01695412,0.011867718,0.0057819188,0.0049844543,0.00077258056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053962926,0.0000029734558,0.000042358955,0.000009723809,0.000002311716,0.000013723601,0.00024888213,0.000165511,0.00008667911,0.99847585,0.00011471557,0.0008319111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006914779,0.000004899928,0.000034965233,0.00001352186,0.000002414995,0.00001424879,0.000090092755,0.0006953273,0.00013830415,0.9960537,0.0029414855,0.00000420613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006509883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071925257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009499939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019788737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025276127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050241053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988614922","doi":"10.1111/j.0029-4624.2004.00479.x","title":"Epistemic Virtues, Metavirtues, and Computational Complexity","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Noûs","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Virtue; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Verstehen","score_opus":0.10526565768056691,"score_gpt":0.2817324138864518,"score_spread":0.17646675620588492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988614922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19448186,0.005462598,0.33349976,0.05589962,0.00039893517,0.00005928313,0.00012664858,0.00032833352,0.40974298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776909,0.0005684095,0.017907834,0.0007182725,0.0001598593,0.00004252461,0.000021848458,0.000023076745,0.00286722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729794,0.0014929046,0.00015734466,0.00029532926,0.00049591204,0.00026064555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842285,0.011139242,0.0013458804,0.0019856768,0.0007251696,0.00057552307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047742776,0.00034224466,0.00039561876,0.001236024,0.0018230372,0.0059310384,0.0008566929,0.0023177962,0.0038697328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010088077,0.00030122598,0.0007373376,0.00070367364,0.018695597,0.009295089,0.003923258,0.003050083,0.00040209194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029821276,0.0000032025516,0.00010826528,0.000008770721,0.0000018440322,0.00000927025,0.00012834989,0.00021642352,0.000033175413,0.9984907,0.00013393353,0.00086312246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003204299,0.000003595297,0.00014484578,0.000011292931,0.0000021693077,0.000032699685,0.000090846064,0.0011960512,0.00008357765,0.9958687,0.0025595187,0.0000037285727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040557206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048152206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059310384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017251775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009088451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025249064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990488681","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2004.12.007","title":"Naturalized epistemology, or what the Strong Programme can’t explain","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Rationality; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy of science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2651493157997661,"score_gpt":0.34166672357479155,"score_spread":0.07651740777502547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990488681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019518027,0.008181963,0.131165,0.4035421,0.004629315,0.00014125541,0.00036307456,0.0003081215,0.4321512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86155075,0.0048900624,0.02700039,0.04654134,0.0050627906,0.00056412624,0.00028309782,0.00049239874,0.053615034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946403,0.0030439368,0.00022232218,0.00077072065,0.00086817617,0.00045460596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861065,0.008350743,0.0008194189,0.0029153419,0.0011307145,0.0006771721],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009466105,0.0005961884,0.0010963833,0.001528272,0.0038489774,0.0068905153,0.001984993,0.0047101625,0.015862428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022274546,0.00040688523,0.00088675285,0.00090994034,0.040431384,0.02143391,0.0044933367,0.009446725,0.002561313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046375694,0.000009059784,0.00009266838,0.000042230968,0.0000058175256,0.000008371278,0.000337794,0.00004946972,0.000022495919,0.99510115,0.0023998304,0.0019265073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070264273,0.000004823453,0.00006537903,0.00004471394,0.0000025313284,0.000013317435,0.00030874106,0.000106571344,0.00003873387,0.98589003,0.0135148605,0.0000032064181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019797187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023992301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99615103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029674694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005386611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05306512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991160143","doi":"10.5007/1808-1711.2012v16n2p297","title":"The cognitive importance of testimony","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Principia an international journal of epistemology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Cognition; Epistemology; Function (biology); Psychology; Power (physics); Reliability (semiconductor); Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.07992154211989265,"score_gpt":0.3403069579943643,"score_spread":0.2603854158744716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991160143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4374919,0.006247781,0.2145206,0.031352207,0.00082506816,0.00015145908,0.00030834015,0.00018621713,0.3089165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884956,0.0005406684,0.009500127,0.0003912171,0.00023018786,0.000021654267,0.000038926453,0.000018287592,0.00076334795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98895967,0.00585286,0.0004492823,0.0010043196,0.003306724,0.00042721521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9032552,0.079143345,0.0048845555,0.0054928903,0.0055252593,0.0016987068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011901102,0.00044221658,0.0004663115,0.0028793104,0.0016181266,0.00478415,0.0009689753,0.0018150312,0.0037809627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10083335,0.00043592657,0.00053392,0.0012653171,0.010307269,0.008468366,0.004146484,0.0029328316,0.000260527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025423025,0.00007664774,0.01079752,0.0007742705,0.00014661557,0.00026118712,0.014366759,0.0024690914,0.0042278776,0.88285494,0.0018199548,0.081950955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049881786,0.00009819107,0.017549701,0.00025839452,0.0001201307,0.00057399814,0.0033148644,0.0056154327,0.0017926011,0.959176,0.011389681,0.00006110852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00124635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010754121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011901102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022966026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011625277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06293976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992034051","doi":"10.1017/s0012217311000333","title":"How to Be an Epistemic Value Pluralist","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Pluralism (philosophy); Monism; Sketch; Value pluralism; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.17957963643219838,"score_gpt":0.2722297903846509,"score_spread":0.09265015395245252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992034051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02681003,0.0027691564,0.3076459,0.24627514,0.0028304001,0.00020391174,0.000109090004,0.00026870598,0.4130876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.899329,0.00068420655,0.06397148,0.014042403,0.0011849564,0.0002860117,0.000074161486,0.00024372057,0.020184167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9676849,0.017720105,0.0012814747,0.0043571326,0.0068059713,0.002150348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730523,0.011813315,0.0014744528,0.0051130997,0.0062850984,0.0022618445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03867015,0.0007350102,0.0011228995,0.0022284524,0.009607075,0.017252615,0.0026609492,0.010770765,0.0077109016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03789782,0.000901854,0.0013678612,0.0011010735,0.053084087,0.023297904,0.011820994,0.015511137,0.0024075648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006061981,0.000009177267,0.000059563852,0.00001708738,0.0000071468953,0.000021943393,0.0010660945,0.00013762077,0.00005822019,0.9956879,0.0012275741,0.0017015107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000889194,0.000004228675,0.000021358806,0.00004478841,0.0000041220246,0.000021105703,0.00047303372,0.0003888198,0.00009214285,0.9841793,0.01475513,0.0000070803944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028499055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002319537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03867015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007921534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071109105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20450974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992103826","doi":"10.1017/s0953820812000374","title":"Playing Dice with Morality: Weighted Lotteries and the Number Problem","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Lottery; Dice; Morality; Outcome (game theory); Action (physics); Economics; Mathematical economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Microeconomics; Law and economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.028476265113334016,"score_gpt":0.22992297309469634,"score_spread":0.20144670798136233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992103826","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08382603,0.0027602208,0.59530103,0.048228253,0.0010649808,0.00024212478,0.00010475203,0.0001851721,0.26828736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88432884,0.000747062,0.09304014,0.0032489041,0.00058177917,0.00038845115,0.000039464474,0.00011155829,0.017513804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856161,0.010821024,0.00038366398,0.0009938432,0.00160791,0.00057749037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98201054,0.01379374,0.0011272636,0.0016773626,0.00084282784,0.00054831617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017890982,0.00080938404,0.0010684091,0.0011099629,0.003425581,0.005964381,0.0026391854,0.005012027,0.007909226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032368332,0.0005599436,0.0014369915,0.0008907363,0.025003448,0.013227179,0.004194172,0.0062655695,0.0006782357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013661034,0.000011119515,0.000055537057,0.000017867867,0.0000052811074,0.000016739079,0.00014868543,0.001339491,0.00003070712,0.9954861,0.000473527,0.0024012418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009654467,0.000006304856,0.000023995035,0.000011452364,0.0000019450042,0.000010758163,0.00004052201,0.0025546432,0.000033164564,0.9956012,0.0017018899,0.000004526508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010424525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095384836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017890982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036596449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023969852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094617665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993280526","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01253.x","title":"QUANTUM PHYSICS AND THEOLOGY: JOHN POLKINGHORNE ON THOUGHT EXPERIMENTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zygon®","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Eschatology; Subject (documents); Thought experiment; Nothing; Philosophy; Epistemology; History of physics; Philosophy of physics; Physics; Modern physics; Theoretical physics; Theology; Computer science","score_opus":0.10103322677938852,"score_gpt":0.3067831112680287,"score_spread":0.20574988448864018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993280526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04778703,0.06540428,0.034118775,0.34491137,0.00462359,0.00013939363,0.00009595443,0.00011181915,0.5028078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9310104,0.0144287385,0.008180988,0.01776522,0.002783571,0.00017391852,0.000018688268,0.00007776649,0.025560657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930997,0.0050158454,0.00015071039,0.0005082928,0.00091464666,0.000310799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9690504,0.028245227,0.00042564308,0.0008872027,0.0009795885,0.00041193352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0098268865,0.00029104354,0.0005983228,0.0020797125,0.005633389,0.005820514,0.000885442,0.0045945765,0.0022726841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013081123,0.00041408555,0.00035028244,0.0014954305,0.07294329,0.011124101,0.0039319023,0.006757556,0.00034064896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005608828,0.00000452012,0.000025528101,0.000019382102,0.0000013047314,0.000033549142,0.0024969939,0.00009759908,0.000020886238,0.9937337,0.0020837684,0.0014771445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009458146,0.0000048267743,0.000054554464,0.00007611363,0.0000015742019,0.000030799794,0.0005928329,0.00020320326,0.00007771417,0.960445,0.038494505,0.000009480044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005016064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028905496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0098268865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007014784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036330202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051970124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995999972","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300014104","title":"The Universe Is One: Towards a Theory of Knowledge and LifePaul A. Olivier Lanham, MD, University Press of America, 1999, XL, 203 p.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Universe; Sociology; Library science; Theology; Media studies; Physics; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Astrophysics","score_opus":0.060481147476583584,"score_gpt":0.22814091701381292,"score_spread":0.16765976953722933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995999972","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00261326,0.49471885,0.018882297,0.25284958,0.0020745948,0.00003549623,0.0001565095,0.000119424265,0.22854997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3527981,0.48813632,0.024760783,0.022841059,0.0049135475,0.00031829992,0.0002556773,0.00035699306,0.10561927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865913,0.0008687308,0.000050649647,0.00014032108,0.00020835426,0.0000728279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733645,0.0019293797,0.00013376567,0.00013840345,0.00025738828,0.00020457961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003259607,0.0010746974,0.0009312166,0.0027701093,0.004619371,0.008182363,0.0013087484,0.003782833,0.005518253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038340567,0.0006616665,0.00044676018,0.0032131227,0.02472927,0.021608053,0.002871725,0.005935755,0.0015388042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010360758,0.000012122127,0.00008188421,0.00011602121,0.000006438517,0.000058684363,0.0066734054,0.00012395777,0.0000402698,0.9294152,0.049018312,0.014443384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008968434,0.000008970888,0.0002830069,0.00062353595,0.0000066267394,0.000111589536,0.005751266,0.00028024032,0.00005651583,0.73246735,0.26039106,0.000010892066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011343684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01590007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011343684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055527864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046376814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04028845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998570890","doi":"10.1007/s11017-004-4804-4","title":"Ethical Reasoning And The Embodied, Socially Situated Subject","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Metamedicine","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Situated; Philosophy of medicine; Embodied cognition; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Ontology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.1187775919735823,"score_gpt":0.3617884733723568,"score_spread":0.24301088139877453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998570890","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033187296,0.9811477,0.0023446167,0.0048021385,0.000249683,0.000011500477,0.0000069533808,0.000005915829,0.011099562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021972602,0.9708674,0.0025910353,0.0019289016,0.00053663313,0.000054566095,0.000025302104,0.000007026382,0.0020166172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99431497,0.0035060383,0.00028745257,0.0003010648,0.0014558278,0.00013470113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98921764,0.009095278,0.000661317,0.00022409487,0.00067377987,0.00012790856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051326454,0.00085817056,0.0020245095,0.0045872615,0.0015899468,0.0058358097,0.0017420506,0.00552433,0.004546703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009722506,0.00043417228,0.0005527062,0.0071540447,0.014899945,0.006903636,0.0026228228,0.005012493,0.00085913105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027813141,0.000058276186,0.0004380575,0.011487433,0.00009116924,0.00033131134,0.0018548425,0.0006329167,0.00021727773,0.52307343,0.013875122,0.44791237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024055811,0.000029406774,0.0011785376,0.021421703,0.00005783763,0.0015553402,0.002493362,0.00028738956,0.00022108761,0.4005026,0.57219446,0.000034175886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003925418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072847833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058358097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032991813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01094988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027144372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999514253","doi":"10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9","title":"Presupposition and the a priori","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Presupposition; A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Philosophy of mind; Rationalization (economics); Philosophy of science","score_opus":0.18194464978820737,"score_gpt":0.3315458218216278,"score_spread":0.1496011720334204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999514253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066068016,0.021737453,0.22318837,0.10875585,0.0012756932,0.00008713379,0.00041963535,0.00014780513,0.5783201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9606399,0.0030643425,0.023611102,0.0029547785,0.0009863554,0.00014455277,0.00014093865,0.000061295585,0.008396828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98916,0.007703636,0.00041262462,0.0011555234,0.0011947851,0.00037351687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9625593,0.029798608,0.0012081944,0.0038851318,0.0017188732,0.000829868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013450794,0.00069346663,0.00114677,0.002512571,0.004238831,0.008796807,0.0023329086,0.00545134,0.008578621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026223516,0.0009235303,0.00083918683,0.0014494723,0.036663823,0.019245218,0.004472024,0.007489759,0.0010612812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075418366,0.0000056416407,0.000036504058,0.000016248814,0.0000029467185,0.000013077175,0.00021789994,0.00006763203,0.000023677514,0.99857354,0.000245718,0.00078958407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004027263,0.0000021222568,0.00002625051,0.000019894698,0.0000018092754,0.000013112986,0.00009343751,0.0001731574,0.000028137289,0.9978382,0.0017977562,0.0000021889416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012907191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010763351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013450794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003747985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033735987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0711354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000132399","doi":"10.1017/s0012217310000077","title":"Does Epistemic “Ought” Imply “Can”?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029757198700302873,"score_gpt":0.24767829986835194,"score_spread":0.21792110116804905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000132399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019539783,0.0034796505,0.027284859,0.11915525,0.001454711,0.000027323733,0.00014671995,0.00011212295,0.8287995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97334415,0.0011988588,0.0044262595,0.007738024,0.000644965,0.0000448823,0.00008501016,0.000105076295,0.01241271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883548,0.0075781876,0.00045929741,0.0012381072,0.0013655439,0.001004038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851756,0.008780308,0.001126213,0.0021675474,0.002061335,0.00068887434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010560385,0.00046397658,0.00084043236,0.0016282605,0.0060812505,0.01073016,0.001210238,0.005305374,0.017926013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028195225,0.00062059856,0.0006763438,0.0015560196,0.032738432,0.02333717,0.0041591562,0.0061246296,0.0028913636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014097364,0.000003971781,0.00011617788,0.00003027596,0.000003733428,0.000033241016,0.002322036,0.00002077412,0.000029755196,0.99430436,0.0018362107,0.0012853565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000100006855,0.000005527076,0.00035576,0.00011924733,0.000010973709,0.00009113056,0.0031425864,0.00015400627,0.00011708226,0.9666703,0.029311288,0.00001203439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038519881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041246167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017926013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036274493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037906885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05996847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003018970","doi":"10.1017/s0953820808003208","title":"Benefit versus Numbers versus Helping the Worst-off: An Alternative to the Prevalent Approach to the Just Distribution of Resources","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"sort; Metric (unit); Distribution (mathematics); Aggregate (composite); Characterization (materials science); Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Operations management","score_opus":0.1623778619965742,"score_gpt":0.3084663210537725,"score_spread":0.14608845905719828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003018970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029592866,0.0062059946,0.25880793,0.15219375,0.0014866628,0.00010202956,0.000120362914,0.0001232747,0.5513671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9219748,0.0019773464,0.040856272,0.011769562,0.0013053915,0.00031257444,0.000035499786,0.00016270428,0.02160584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877538,0.007839443,0.00037111426,0.0011440917,0.0021855198,0.00070592004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99071866,0.005203288,0.00093098904,0.0012130812,0.0012071332,0.0007268599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012472445,0.0010615244,0.0010153591,0.0025804501,0.005740397,0.0113813775,0.00269573,0.007276852,0.0060055763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016521094,0.00043604666,0.0008214473,0.0020534475,0.0642552,0.019779209,0.007898132,0.008132913,0.0008830922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065158606,0.0000031922252,0.000033344455,0.000012490251,0.000001921639,0.00000599896,0.0005633771,0.000052048417,0.000025180543,0.99801314,0.0003709619,0.00091185194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007633393,0.000010956385,0.00008590646,0.00004927062,0.000004608701,0.00001999021,0.00070839556,0.00021665123,0.00006265195,0.98513967,0.013687662,0.000006653837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021835163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003432475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012472445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063479654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036344614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06596142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003146617","doi":"10.4000/etudes-benthamiennes.675","title":"Sidgwick’s Argument for Utilitarianism and his Moral Epistemology: A Reply to David Phillips","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d’études benthamiennes","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Object (grammar); Medicine","score_opus":0.06728666743146006,"score_gpt":0.2621656290886392,"score_spread":0.19487896165717916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003146617","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003164321,0.00626497,0.0088278605,0.9021554,0.0025107737,0.000015346755,0.000053375537,0.00003058678,0.07697738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44424358,0.006596992,0.011626307,0.4743088,0.014085821,0.0003547338,0.00006997779,0.0003414827,0.048372407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98612183,0.008028819,0.00052449526,0.0020844196,0.0025663408,0.00067405734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97275734,0.022108652,0.00063549925,0.0015012622,0.0022465405,0.00075071736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017279493,0.0009810088,0.0014152561,0.0018723292,0.0074059013,0.009851112,0.0031857481,0.026352882,0.0071619307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03971824,0.000856433,0.0012721997,0.0022485917,0.05099027,0.019680627,0.007603178,0.036159817,0.0019298668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006274541,0.0000039049755,0.00002712116,0.000019625613,0.0000035077023,0.00002715004,0.0008811189,0.000047551384,0.000012604213,0.9794446,0.018321674,0.0012048946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014262141,0.000004587136,0.00003840597,0.00008250851,0.0000022624315,0.00004487095,0.00033071206,0.00014984582,0.000046581357,0.9334055,0.06587007,0.000010492131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050094356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036864323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026352882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008910036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004781905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091383755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004109686","doi":"10.1177/1056492613501228","title":"Can We “Regain” Truth and Objectivity? A Reply to Baillie and Meckler","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Inquiry","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Confusion; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Statement (logic); Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Medicine","score_opus":0.06438789368515797,"score_gpt":0.26861510834229224,"score_spread":0.20422721465713428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004109686","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007586778,0.0019418614,0.0004742842,0.9926386,0.0013485721,0.0000027846424,0.000008311187,0.0000111734025,0.0028157495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10832529,0.0042954814,0.001916441,0.86599076,0.011707633,0.00007997547,0.000035141205,0.00014296193,0.007506294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97537225,0.015264678,0.0010963809,0.0024490154,0.0045214486,0.0012963479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91248345,0.07169686,0.0030672725,0.0041880365,0.0064490368,0.0021153796],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02856779,0.0009386485,0.00190664,0.0015875212,0.009336857,0.013357731,0.004944869,0.041087087,0.0046825022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090946145,0.0009973671,0.0012249763,0.0021561813,0.05480761,0.030445786,0.009310352,0.051985,0.0022540253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007919309,0.000028174894,0.00027374507,0.00015687934,0.000019283969,0.00034751373,0.018827086,0.00017733463,0.00020472772,0.6013489,0.3705462,0.007991003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010143257,0.00003236608,0.0005621453,0.00069559214,0.00001847827,0.0004014788,0.015586947,0.00052587234,0.0006310841,0.58921576,0.39209038,0.00013845995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011905051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007842677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9906632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008518996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057991967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15108275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006480301","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00308.x","title":"The Good, the Bad, and the Social: On Living as an Answerable Agent","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Sociology; Drama; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06966309308549744,"score_gpt":0.32055127419387885,"score_spread":0.2508881811083814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006480301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090770595,0.010398021,0.17924382,0.1795091,0.001192624,0.00011032745,0.000120413475,0.00014599659,0.53850913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95535237,0.0033074769,0.017178105,0.0058094766,0.0006308784,0.00016021874,0.00007115884,0.00008678024,0.01740336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939137,0.0043650214,0.0001468497,0.00047805655,0.00069542055,0.00040106833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936605,0.004299965,0.0005204291,0.0005562743,0.00052287243,0.0004399439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006662711,0.0004471526,0.0004996698,0.0013353768,0.005971102,0.0066340202,0.0013635677,0.00422018,0.0047015618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008565029,0.00025022443,0.0005664358,0.0010014571,0.04820169,0.01575895,0.007123408,0.004037533,0.00063249096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049767814,0.0000072964085,0.00009311877,0.000011666369,0.0000019050472,0.000036865997,0.003447617,0.0001959015,0.00004064777,0.9938645,0.00053525344,0.001760281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004255795,0.0000090084095,0.00007733457,0.00003185789,0.0000024902674,0.000026574175,0.0018755723,0.00049168535,0.000056832374,0.9778972,0.019519607,0.000007566564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034157108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00239868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006662711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003262127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021808457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03523618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008113637","doi":"10.1007/s12136-014-0222-z","title":"Swinburne on Basing and Deviant Inferential Pathways","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"Swinburne University of Technology","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Relation (database); Epistemology; Counterexample; Simple (philosophy); Subject (documents); Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06145798561347454,"score_gpt":0.2461109013355658,"score_spread":0.18465291572209125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008113637","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043282267,0.0069671804,0.56534904,0.09395682,0.0012202102,0.0002707662,0.00025980343,0.0003012419,0.28839278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8062468,0.0027783446,0.15356816,0.0059758206,0.0007703189,0.00047739936,0.00015519276,0.00042184038,0.02960604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831383,0.01041907,0.00072326773,0.002548412,0.0024740994,0.00069683796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95864075,0.02936291,0.00094764424,0.0069226515,0.0035368523,0.0005892514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020515313,0.0010691895,0.0015703219,0.0037624957,0.005668513,0.009248498,0.00327137,0.005893382,0.0073742187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059276678,0.00097272324,0.001488296,0.0020980511,0.05550924,0.020558538,0.008958307,0.0120167555,0.0011289637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070398246,0.0000044954522,0.000080826256,0.000017162143,0.0000062929876,0.000022931368,0.0008950684,0.00022417505,0.000025275627,0.9962853,0.00044651103,0.001984817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003558155,0.0000022642496,0.000021914395,0.000021088701,0.0000027443473,0.000009943202,0.00009909696,0.00037521892,0.0000606986,0.99654996,0.00285004,0.000003500219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057722256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047612716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020515313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004835629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043121916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10849661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011931323","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzq003","title":"Conditionals, Probabilities, and Utilities: More on Two Envelopes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Argument (complex analysis); Stipulation; Basis (linear algebra); Presupposition; Absurdity; Mathematical economics; Conditional probability; Philosophy; Envelope (radar); Epistemology; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.05367025140232995,"score_gpt":0.28862454659955317,"score_spread":0.23495429519722322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011931323","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07294406,0.01486011,0.48806936,0.08059439,0.0014429309,0.00007896123,0.0003671002,0.0002780431,0.34136513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94351035,0.0027126358,0.033380553,0.005684649,0.0010692844,0.00009532019,0.00010963776,0.00023470029,0.013202894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936585,0.0036825137,0.00022754089,0.0007225369,0.001283469,0.00042544343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98650557,0.009480907,0.00062820717,0.0019409887,0.00094743946,0.0004969488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00904065,0.0010011628,0.0013656508,0.0028301051,0.0026636538,0.010852957,0.0016528049,0.0056879264,0.015144049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017507572,0.0007241336,0.0012644466,0.0021813284,0.0275351,0.04318965,0.0066962913,0.008923416,0.00094744656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056174276,0.0000033238384,0.000040830553,0.00000938722,0.0000022570532,0.000015941863,0.00029742118,0.0001316234,0.000027635422,0.9980147,0.00024477104,0.0012064712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027405952,0.000003281687,0.000042598902,0.000017794468,0.000001638455,0.000021148206,0.00009872714,0.00046093418,0.000025777832,0.9961694,0.0031504903,0.0000054511984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023687189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012403004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015144049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003325036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012108184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05066192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012272852","doi":"10.1007/s11098-012-9916-5","title":"Probabilizing the end","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Construct (python library); Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of language; Transmission (telecommunications); Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Telecommunications; Data mining; Computer network","score_opus":0.33053102000403156,"score_gpt":0.3524795400323163,"score_spread":0.021948520028284735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012272852","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069262445,0.0017569693,0.65331435,0.034571532,0.0014579935,0.00023455148,0.0015334799,0.00084180926,0.23702693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8923937,0.0012042316,0.048296843,0.004579031,0.0020289777,0.00043733374,0.0010156733,0.00039785946,0.04964629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934109,0.0020044313,0.0003203254,0.0022406625,0.0011386888,0.00088500197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.956604,0.031913683,0.0016337058,0.0060222624,0.0026554724,0.0011709556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074635143,0.00095287967,0.0014671282,0.0019031905,0.0040335353,0.00766709,0.0020257893,0.003595276,0.02865107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062510155,0.00102643,0.0017387128,0.0009984272,0.0071064145,0.013312371,0.0044370056,0.009722915,0.0028276476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048023994,0.000029074019,0.0008908162,0.000057400124,0.000032308115,0.000050594354,0.00015500178,0.0012697012,0.0001220729,0.9891755,0.0028226052,0.0053468347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010507349,0.00000904591,0.00028523512,0.00002527478,0.000012595105,0.00004404844,0.00005034536,0.00400027,0.00015918797,0.9927248,0.0026701295,0.000008607582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001559034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020987422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02865107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027062744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031426416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09584737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012977568","doi":"10.1007/s10699-014-9373-z","title":"Scientific Consensus and Expert Testimony in Courts: Lessons from the Bendectin Litigation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Foundations of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University; Azrieli Foundation","keywords":"Deference; Skepticism; Scientific consensus; Philosophy of science; Epistemic community; Epistemology; Scientific evidence; Value (mathematics); Philosophy of language; Sociology; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.10588196342595235,"score_gpt":0.3314058282883268,"score_spread":0.22552386486237447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012977568","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05177841,0.009835469,0.024282873,0.6503159,0.00086579943,0.00007184534,0.000121167635,0.00005176735,0.26267684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9487056,0.0033895886,0.006591516,0.031019213,0.0011227772,0.00010907251,0.000045777757,0.00004917981,0.008967258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9426755,0.036981836,0.0023285768,0.0035974192,0.009316334,0.0051004426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7102332,0.25934967,0.006802802,0.0070113433,0.013108783,0.0034941717],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08042942,0.0005516846,0.0016865066,0.0036300402,0.01660574,0.024407431,0.0045962455,0.038330987,0.009983688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20519508,0.000783901,0.0011145752,0.00362767,0.0558612,0.023729784,0.014185069,0.02444295,0.0009772084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022447295,0.000025927044,0.00041619307,0.000046970155,0.000016474416,0.0002276825,0.0034224645,0.0005492863,0.000035251396,0.98321253,0.004774907,0.0072499127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003600971,0.000009334051,0.00033580099,0.00018704172,0.000011533678,0.00006561325,0.002032793,0.00073888793,0.00008641791,0.9871553,0.009315861,0.000025355117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020130353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023456808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98339427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015726684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0280427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4253565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014972689","doi":"10.4148/biyclc.v4i0.129","title":"Theory Of Knowledge In Britain From 1860 To 1950","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition Logic and Communication","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Sketch; Order (exchange); Ideology; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Classics; History; Law; Politics; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.0965306949269695,"score_gpt":0.28888331172728676,"score_spread":0.19235261680031726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014972689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028772168,0.124645196,0.006449494,0.026024329,0.0020126281,0.00005841092,0.00040610263,0.000086674605,0.811545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6788,0.04322401,0.0039717867,0.00488614,0.0014747417,0.00014195517,0.00040658485,0.00012197895,0.2669728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741805,0.000922961,0.00012755988,0.00044852417,0.00073539896,0.00034750745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979438,0.0010733593,0.00015983025,0.00016621524,0.00047962135,0.00017704998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019296345,0.00065302657,0.00085120497,0.0039012101,0.004473669,0.0071076993,0.0007136855,0.0030886068,0.007505848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004101002,0.00082630914,0.00041800836,0.0038907328,0.018844033,0.0054586767,0.0027253896,0.0034209446,0.0029167954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029320767,0.00001496075,0.00033625294,0.00017455721,0.00000877176,0.00017791077,0.008253257,0.0004632307,0.00008372751,0.9621625,0.011957438,0.016338183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023653905,0.000033679567,0.002429218,0.00030347292,0.000010712611,0.0001512337,0.0010955354,0.0004331346,0.00015534974,0.26134694,0.73399675,0.000020325902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091963224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061351232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091963224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03891158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072358213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2823246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016435477","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.923240","title":"Justification is potential knowledge","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; University of Aberdeen","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.06459974620442645,"score_gpt":0.25092442753209715,"score_spread":0.18632468132767072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016435477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016179794,0.0072916704,0.23503163,0.080872275,0.0013255919,0.00010261787,0.0002099116,0.00019776754,0.6587888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416375,0.002705268,0.025703035,0.00580528,0.0011223118,0.00020390794,0.00013433029,0.0001251647,0.022563247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914704,0.0044179163,0.00031747867,0.0012532283,0.0018243904,0.00071651646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876166,0.007984473,0.0006644174,0.0015578077,0.0017558865,0.00042083336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009245339,0.00048895465,0.0009270258,0.00243747,0.0046082684,0.009166037,0.001437988,0.0061804065,0.008465248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015289776,0.0004219102,0.0010255055,0.0014728935,0.04257462,0.015924135,0.0047202306,0.0054270723,0.0016076182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015380929,0.0000014067542,0.000015837551,0.000012772262,0.0000013989585,0.000008927001,0.00016924574,0.000050327984,0.00001024946,0.9984549,0.0004443003,0.0008289959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034498528,0.0000023364742,0.000024698655,0.0000403235,0.0000017699786,0.000024620882,0.00011119871,0.0001955503,0.000037589438,0.986839,0.012715798,0.0000036417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029268055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018565624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009245339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005875498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050055445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048894584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016936562","doi":"10.5840/symposion2014118","title":"For True Conditionalizers Weisberg’s Paradox is a False Alarm","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposion","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.044863477369113544,"score_gpt":0.2756459070691836,"score_spread":0.23078242970007007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016936562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093107656,0.0047945892,0.27572525,0.23684242,0.004238144,0.00014582055,0.00059954857,0.00077997363,0.3837666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92591476,0.001338402,0.038181216,0.017515372,0.0014633718,0.00012573454,0.00017907945,0.00021167287,0.015070413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989363,0.003841133,0.0007808533,0.0022306247,0.002975277,0.0008091024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733055,0.016413692,0.0021776322,0.0038528466,0.0036924086,0.0005579035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011836846,0.0005912089,0.001020216,0.0019228122,0.0036906325,0.005149285,0.0014320415,0.004696932,0.010449256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037557833,0.00054885395,0.0009685124,0.0010888776,0.014589933,0.014134202,0.0040143235,0.008035209,0.001358524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003346951,0.000014381842,0.0005494168,0.00005930019,0.000020727874,0.00017009852,0.0010817349,0.00014298646,0.00022340444,0.98312265,0.0072018513,0.0073800455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012576212,0.0000068382983,0.00026740268,0.000037334186,0.000011652455,0.00024794822,0.00033625565,0.00048582404,0.00038171042,0.985268,0.012927286,0.000017262075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094200764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060236186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011836846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027509637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001647336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06259996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017501627","doi":"10.1007/s11229-013-0394-x","title":"The traditional conception of the a priori","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Government of Canada; University of Georgia","keywords":"Philosophy of language; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Independence (probability theory); A priori and a posteriori; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07577999644456604,"score_gpt":0.23780127874574028,"score_spread":0.16202128230117424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017501627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012494428,0.017311614,0.31689465,0.10051681,0.004844025,0.00013848887,0.0007002212,0.00021296825,0.5468868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7783933,0.011230439,0.14043376,0.017712615,0.00546979,0.00082914584,0.0004550807,0.00031792457,0.04515793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99112284,0.005741804,0.00043214991,0.0012093965,0.0012451308,0.00024871522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833552,0.011290721,0.0009007059,0.0024714835,0.0015337159,0.00044808924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011345341,0.0009452398,0.0009984087,0.0043855836,0.0032790408,0.009784763,0.0025221007,0.005104042,0.00786846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018542962,0.00069559464,0.00086442573,0.0026008366,0.039165847,0.014254679,0.0031825819,0.007396146,0.0020540338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004428259,0.0000022471008,0.000015381736,0.000028825252,0.0000021599424,0.000003329327,0.0002951717,0.00004184816,0.000018136081,0.99805474,0.00056055316,0.0009732806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060189905,0.000004133625,0.00003434187,0.00011855658,0.0000044448097,0.000019931103,0.0002679624,0.00020381693,0.000061411505,0.98182136,0.01745435,0.0000036977467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017798819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018728827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011345341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005181817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006658493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0600006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017694486","doi":"10.1037/h0086865","title":"When reviews attack: Ethics, free speech, and the peer review process.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Psychology; Tone (literature); Process (computing); Peer review; Engineering ethics; Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.19331130056336224,"score_gpt":0.36765140462908175,"score_spread":0.1743401040657195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017694486","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0104733305,0.07104878,0.049671803,0.7155053,0.024957966,0.00037967807,0.00007403632,0.00036935395,0.12751973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63678765,0.036864553,0.04946315,0.16349353,0.04186293,0.0016330632,0.00010033429,0.00070913933,0.069085635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6655062,0.25529444,0.012180274,0.010245552,0.052005038,0.0047684833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.54555607,0.32413507,0.052476853,0.01994951,0.04613603,0.011746519],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15302174,0.00075293146,0.0009857288,0.0032627145,0.008363803,0.02953448,0.0022076764,0.020062402,0.004760827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4349044,0.0007534723,0.00064809434,0.0023962508,0.038435288,0.023388524,0.010473489,0.013018787,0.002836886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009319802,0.000030191883,0.0015796568,0.0008309485,0.00008077363,0.00065207784,0.03134284,0.00023015578,0.0004255489,0.753971,0.12147223,0.08929136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004998964,0.0000704561,0.0019017789,0.0020845465,0.00004072968,0.0010577248,0.0121669825,0.0007161823,0.0005477316,0.51100314,0.47024077,0.000119932876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027552564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031822114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9799376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00784183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020193918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.809266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017901305","doi":"10.7202/017645ar","title":"Le débat de la pertinence existentielle de la théodicée. Positions, enjeux et éclairages sur les rapports entre théorie et pratique","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Théologiques","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.041362626848814955,"score_gpt":0.29219294894205555,"score_spread":0.2508303220932406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017901305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07196499,0.062321726,0.03974372,0.15713888,0.0038046527,0.00006719644,0.000116684234,0.00008403297,0.66475815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.928513,0.014333583,0.004407562,0.0055069677,0.0017978993,0.00010178839,0.00005060837,0.00011916635,0.045169428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874166,0.007779842,0.0005098356,0.0013835473,0.0022381758,0.0006720594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807108,0.014017819,0.0011014544,0.0013826471,0.0019503757,0.00083695207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011268586,0.00046665923,0.0005790551,0.0031129862,0.008137192,0.015878135,0.0010233276,0.0037017355,0.0077668764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026607232,0.00043849178,0.0005901615,0.0025904484,0.04883014,0.016577281,0.008753088,0.008089647,0.00096945034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000224244,0.000009149556,0.0003566992,0.00008997278,0.0000070383267,0.000049259655,0.023294406,0.000052778643,0.00021824919,0.96226263,0.0018774574,0.011759914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017801494,0.0000514266,0.0021814897,0.00064339343,0.000016569575,0.00030428031,0.03333388,0.00025352678,0.000767355,0.71063197,0.25175372,0.00004457886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005965981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076522655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015878135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009167266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064937924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06651348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018109134","doi":"10.1007/s11229-010-9855-7","title":"Socially relevant philosophy of science: an introduction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Philosophy of computer science; Philosophy of language; Epistemology; Philosophy education; Philosophy of biology; Economic methodology; Western philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Social philosophy; Philosophy of sport; Social epistemology; Philosophy of mind; Metaphysics; Sociology; Philosophy of medicine; Engineering ethics; Social science; Philosophy; Social relation; Engineering","score_opus":0.04323880442566755,"score_gpt":0.28373717736337745,"score_spread":0.2404983729377099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018109134","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063604075,0.39868158,0.21855867,0.1131033,0.013340603,0.00038797897,0.0008770655,0.0003257236,0.24836473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24380393,0.39530748,0.23831199,0.03345628,0.039604288,0.0027384246,0.0014131542,0.0009531225,0.044411313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967546,0.0021627059,0.00021287487,0.00025337347,0.00047843638,0.00013802214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98979133,0.008796084,0.00026743556,0.00047685916,0.000454396,0.00021385035],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005535692,0.0016368671,0.001668992,0.007653128,0.0036159393,0.008740797,0.0022901075,0.0066541266,0.008765633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008019717,0.0010616487,0.0016986527,0.005809504,0.018040909,0.012277536,0.0040008784,0.00859151,0.0020597912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064736896,0.00004364112,0.00007120859,0.0003986701,0.000009989357,0.00004820471,0.0015073053,0.00043124528,0.00010888135,0.979505,0.0074454783,0.010423837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063451553,0.000016093136,0.00013975086,0.0010262314,0.000005053919,0.000104963736,0.0007057145,0.00039135644,0.000090540765,0.8495994,0.14789908,0.000015493762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023870661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002877761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004968064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00453538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03604597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019330996","doi":"10.1007/s11229-013-0294-0","title":"Saving Pritchard’s anti-luck virtue epistemology: the case of Temp","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Luck; Philosophy; Epistemology; Virtue; Epistemic virtue","score_opus":0.04346735699027647,"score_gpt":0.26243632322462584,"score_spread":0.21896896623434936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019330996","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043341823,0.005272726,0.03370768,0.08259886,0.0017014887,0.000044558197,0.00009567566,0.00017355052,0.83306366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9236299,0.0012775332,0.010003963,0.009852557,0.0004982236,0.00008235814,0.000045252054,0.00038966097,0.054220602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969214,0.0019766942,0.000060582228,0.0003686462,0.0003943005,0.00027830165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947431,0.0038697002,0.00014657501,0.0007220577,0.00033304672,0.00018544037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004551488,0.00043064557,0.00056313135,0.0015030203,0.007517032,0.008290041,0.0010878848,0.0059867823,0.008024586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012809468,0.00042142722,0.0004285345,0.0010472813,0.028141445,0.011492846,0.0039403467,0.0095085045,0.0011636635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009257563,0.0000063370207,0.000034218952,0.000017357997,0.000002342876,0.000056263416,0.0075181755,0.00007939969,0.00002940648,0.9852283,0.004221099,0.0027979135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001103992,0.000008503826,0.00014103673,0.00014077309,0.0000056582685,0.00013722426,0.005231619,0.00040368506,0.0002780237,0.8802755,0.11335046,0.000016446735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003309057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008203317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008290041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030386744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027188242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021095616","doi":"10.1007/s10670-010-9221-7","title":"Developmental Process Reliabilism: on Justification, Defeat, and Evidence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Epistemology; Process (computing); Ontology; Internalism and externalism; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.08143505972504642,"score_gpt":0.29671524185062126,"score_spread":0.21528018212557484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021095616","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09879137,0.026732193,0.51370376,0.14593922,0.00077378575,0.00021044802,0.00035824077,0.0003284037,0.21316265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9517614,0.002719596,0.040664826,0.0016020127,0.0003297838,0.00018936265,0.00013373305,0.00012945346,0.0024697557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9767488,0.014832624,0.001316012,0.0026249979,0.0033249317,0.00115267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8205647,0.15022084,0.0054190247,0.014896231,0.007071773,0.0018273127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04118197,0.0010094494,0.0017346274,0.0060671186,0.004023441,0.009044932,0.005220923,0.007721664,0.006111446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12732859,0.0011007154,0.0015238842,0.0029744992,0.071597725,0.027163006,0.009256754,0.010876458,0.00065019936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015355825,0.000008898838,0.00026653928,0.000046861813,0.0000073540036,0.000044939185,0.0009311394,0.00021660108,0.000025447682,0.9947507,0.0002839613,0.0034021374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008399605,0.0000038641847,0.0000981894,0.00007542672,0.000004493477,0.000037221,0.00027708235,0.00066191563,0.00010109663,0.99697256,0.0017532881,0.000006365911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029627203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021472792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04118197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006491676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006347039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21779364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023038545","doi":"10.1111/1468-0017.00199","title":"False Photos, False Beliefs, and Coherence: A Response to Kamawar <i>et al.</i>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind & Language","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.04275782833178031,"score_gpt":0.2793803977913255,"score_spread":0.23662256945954518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023038545","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037631852,0.0013936101,0.00017107255,0.9938327,0.0035106798,0.000003725214,0.000013894305,0.000011201352,0.0006867497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0109156715,0.0015637841,0.0004464318,0.9797385,0.0062187053,0.000032110274,0.00001573817,0.000036243924,0.0010328533],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98290974,0.010634494,0.0011628568,0.0017222795,0.0028679934,0.00070264976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82963115,0.14336179,0.004404738,0.0034608813,0.015843023,0.003298392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024277994,0.0011754967,0.001563315,0.0012840867,0.013721138,0.010697103,0.00405289,0.045703303,0.0044203694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10866478,0.0009675638,0.0011836297,0.0017559003,0.028716937,0.020391434,0.0060375556,0.07593781,0.0024243225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007657967,0.000037732196,0.00047800902,0.00013087246,0.000022062814,0.00040785433,0.017845007,0.00005577286,0.00012698815,0.031702742,0.9395876,0.009528704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015192488,0.000046952326,0.0012130663,0.0012469594,0.000045608987,0.0027897956,0.069508374,0.0006002245,0.0006769377,0.077083685,0.84640193,0.00023443453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011377917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011362587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045703303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057375077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00683366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12839586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023111101","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01014.x","title":"Introduction: Philosophy in and Philosophy of Cognitive Science","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Topics in Cognitive Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Experimental philosophy; Normative; Philosophy of mind; Epistemology; Western philosophy; Philosophy of science; Psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy of computer science; Philosophy; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.08674229483091075,"score_gpt":0.3277596229913722,"score_spread":0.24101732816046142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023111101","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049292576,0.20427148,0.05684413,0.3465705,0.05259119,0.0001415602,0.0015081081,0.00050534523,0.3326384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24231583,0.15122944,0.04418001,0.17939875,0.11537515,0.0006570817,0.0017039089,0.0007061606,0.26443365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983254,0.00073975476,0.000099384626,0.00034294775,0.0003972516,0.00009524178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951179,0.0035212105,0.00021933454,0.0002100856,0.0006625424,0.00026896968],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020625924,0.00075241295,0.00057663315,0.0012011536,0.0026502197,0.005200588,0.0010426531,0.0042202123,0.030642992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046372875,0.00028559443,0.0005647953,0.002135705,0.0070731994,0.0068533877,0.0021905557,0.009221943,0.008365461],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028084412,0.000014742506,0.00028113768,0.00034375678,0.000011488759,0.00006989172,0.0016558965,0.00017082282,0.00020005925,0.76584184,0.20691201,0.024470204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008305355,0.00001893721,0.00047237918,0.00033753915,0.000005559634,0.00019807291,0.00034291414,0.00023479582,0.00005869319,0.35499048,0.64331925,0.000013058956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001845894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010049605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026273946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001487142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10251099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024283275","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9203-1","title":"Enthymemes: From Reconstruction to Understanding","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Phenomenon; Set (abstract data type); Resolution (logic); Philosophy; Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","score_opus":0.3097350493222602,"score_gpt":0.28115900681270983,"score_spread":0.02857604250955037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024283275","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029818257,0.0090582445,0.7185442,0.031850107,0.0006554437,0.00013923987,0.0002302035,0.00051891216,0.20918542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8495025,0.0036704345,0.12993222,0.0014156206,0.00050688797,0.00020595036,0.00030471265,0.00043898588,0.014022647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883847,0.008890635,0.0003546329,0.00080569915,0.0011640659,0.00040014862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891747,0.0072170063,0.00067937304,0.0019207725,0.00065172923,0.00035639724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012408595,0.0010388008,0.0007995585,0.0035281915,0.003450489,0.013392844,0.002815092,0.004609767,0.0072066113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022685999,0.00065655954,0.0009071883,0.0022770262,0.045465965,0.03027562,0.00919392,0.0069491477,0.0012465079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010898476,0.0000034360098,0.00005190014,0.00003269295,0.00000330206,0.000054254477,0.0055073453,0.00022246625,0.00007667279,0.98989105,0.0004454377,0.0037005944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043244877,0.0000047092935,0.000036459012,0.000051188046,0.0000023087723,0.000072111165,0.0019084984,0.0009024747,0.00015622962,0.9828767,0.013979475,0.0000055493583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001347035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009143993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013392844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036539081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022059092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0656237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026055402","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2014.907542","title":"No Work for a Theory of Grounding","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":771,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Economics; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.1570767361856183,"score_gpt":0.30786570342929775,"score_spread":0.15078896724367946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026055402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012454509,0.01655369,0.25835714,0.21585451,0.0055465056,0.00011699956,0.0009778779,0.0007957434,0.48934305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6601574,0.008336877,0.14983085,0.041143946,0.009069306,0.0006441861,0.0015087103,0.0015718641,0.12773684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947126,0.0020546764,0.00023564216,0.001409643,0.0010501354,0.00053735095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99141437,0.0036397872,0.0005751246,0.0026607548,0.0010310203,0.00067893614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007819936,0.0012472039,0.0019294277,0.0023503373,0.0050132065,0.009299525,0.0051802383,0.007711357,0.03537817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013059226,0.0008812656,0.0030999768,0.0018402622,0.031408284,0.042605083,0.0071205217,0.015812729,0.007688677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036751642,0.0000053513418,0.000024790437,0.000017920367,0.0000035480853,0.0000065660624,0.00006831028,0.0000663822,0.000014604489,0.9965731,0.0016547255,0.0015611071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006184365,0.0000041028748,0.000015734753,0.00003022699,0.000002198642,0.000009502723,0.00006599167,0.00014778438,0.00002327196,0.9864807,0.01321055,0.0000036554698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029111125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002601841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03537817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005376134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028100715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11835176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026241495","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.944814","title":"Lexical norms, language comprehension, and the epistemology of testimony","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Comprehension; Underwriting; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.035859880952245314,"score_gpt":0.23333721370638028,"score_spread":0.19747733275413495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026241495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23377348,0.013351204,0.25939763,0.10125925,0.0006984159,0.00016231666,0.00024394355,0.00027071036,0.39084312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98621297,0.00089787086,0.010180957,0.00076619006,0.00017198773,0.00007154093,0.00003732529,0.000042962012,0.0016182428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9674508,0.024882197,0.0012891581,0.0016951975,0.0038401692,0.00084258907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90685976,0.07354194,0.006132223,0.0059019825,0.0063273394,0.001236744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028724108,0.0004726122,0.000838567,0.00437718,0.0048797666,0.011550564,0.0018989932,0.0043233517,0.0025786418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08776504,0.0005076143,0.0005418096,0.0018745885,0.06170471,0.017462796,0.0064409124,0.0046428195,0.00036306898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024416518,0.000022387743,0.0005460504,0.000085237305,0.000010335292,0.000075459415,0.017321825,0.00032955073,0.00022146395,0.9727374,0.0005121313,0.008113801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010589069,0.000009116603,0.00036266906,0.00008694383,0.000004993595,0.000047017555,0.0032379893,0.000559113,0.00027305298,0.9918624,0.0035323987,0.00001376684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004726989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023816673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028724108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005359736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004324869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15190941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027938774","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x09000648","title":"Non-interpretative metacognition for true beliefs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Interpretation (philosophy); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Neuroscience; Linguistics","score_opus":0.13170999151212884,"score_gpt":0.3682362702415026,"score_spread":0.23652627872937373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027938774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54594755,0.0009776526,0.30293944,0.009619486,0.00036049547,0.00014970083,0.00032733986,0.00068156834,0.1389968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98824126,0.00008966368,0.009317233,0.00018418807,0.00007339769,0.000044412616,0.000085420965,0.000049888462,0.0019145161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957125,0.0013103823,0.00032288628,0.0011627115,0.0011177667,0.0003737051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93226427,0.040453758,0.0059162374,0.015193082,0.004663955,0.00150868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005129493,0.0004582024,0.0005949405,0.0012159258,0.0009960581,0.0042569856,0.0015153879,0.001816248,0.014651065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06328467,0.0007301561,0.0011689217,0.00055762596,0.0076666037,0.010140008,0.0040876544,0.0038673955,0.00092864624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006643174,0.0003136749,0.018526657,0.0007842089,0.00020178717,0.0010512106,0.004776749,0.0031174957,0.008273412,0.8902161,0.0017199264,0.07035438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006768713,0.000045794943,0.00958288,0.00008054082,0.000044909957,0.0005201736,0.0002582377,0.009075757,0.002936728,0.9758834,0.0014665839,0.00003731445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009892771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007077523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014651065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015392196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012267411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04901266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028155864","doi":"10.1007/s10670-011-9271-5","title":"Believing For a Reason","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Ontology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.24672533188121026,"score_gpt":0.27170041660330635,"score_spread":0.024975084722096086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028155864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04433132,0.011410168,0.1984504,0.18506865,0.0027883113,0.00012530688,0.00048792877,0.0003450611,0.5569929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9126325,0.003351504,0.04121861,0.013997975,0.0013886226,0.00023220268,0.00047549664,0.00020059281,0.02650241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929287,0.0038473792,0.00029174465,0.001346271,0.0011915455,0.00039426403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99017966,0.006156804,0.00049311115,0.0018332452,0.00095831323,0.00037882253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063740625,0.00078548293,0.0009882753,0.0015348187,0.0038860545,0.0076632956,0.0017094038,0.005411161,0.010957944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02068919,0.0005017223,0.0011370026,0.0007784253,0.024993662,0.013362992,0.003790685,0.008776761,0.0018468545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136100825,0.000012570079,0.00013847614,0.00004060524,0.0000120495415,0.000036908925,0.0010516947,0.00013763183,0.00008364224,0.99336255,0.0022288724,0.0028813728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006160389,0.000003745427,0.000046811216,0.000035553083,0.0000051251463,0.000044577013,0.0002883426,0.00021032357,0.00008030699,0.9874521,0.0118221305,0.000004779614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018358179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012939582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010957944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025606102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022838253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03665799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028438277","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01016.x","title":"Why Cognitive Science Needs Philosophy and Vice Versa","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Topics in Cognitive Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Normative; Generality; Cognition; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09463861549067291,"score_gpt":0.32932463676283885,"score_spread":0.23468602127216592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028438277","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017670935,0.016203225,0.018690288,0.7980552,0.0048397263,0.000033759083,0.000083538354,0.00014366688,0.14427964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7959291,0.01391348,0.016729958,0.14357443,0.0071595972,0.00015691442,0.00010370352,0.0002385687,0.022194173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99291766,0.003966329,0.00020624077,0.0008598986,0.0012633862,0.0007865092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831162,0.010840484,0.00090426445,0.0017002216,0.002045102,0.001393733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011798257,0.00044091573,0.00078754063,0.0011899224,0.0031307065,0.0066139237,0.0009158219,0.006997262,0.007915031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017931815,0.0003742961,0.00073550484,0.0010040978,0.037786614,0.020648593,0.003287358,0.006873702,0.001822582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020909327,0.000019596988,0.0002671337,0.00010635476,0.000012326824,0.000084955296,0.0015966548,0.000112150294,0.00010188327,0.98280704,0.009188968,0.005682162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016680266,0.0000069274756,0.00024100982,0.000071248214,0.0000041420085,0.00011605516,0.00081751274,0.00012512192,0.000047717374,0.95941734,0.039127916,0.0000081929065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031509807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019574063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011798257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036657976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004072458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06239593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028647064","doi":"10.1177/0306312711414759","title":"Models of democracy in social studies of science","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Studies of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Democracy; Politics; Deliberative democracy; Sociology; Egalitarianism; Normative; Political philosophy; Publics; Public reason; Epistemology; Vision; Environmental ethics; Public sphere; Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.40765696991575573,"score_gpt":0.3948934533291963,"score_spread":0.012763516586559442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028647064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024677217,0.020232039,0.24565634,0.15226226,0.0013137335,0.0002802892,0.00020267934,0.00021614027,0.55515933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9384937,0.007065779,0.030966684,0.0048081875,0.0013407418,0.0008702145,0.00011582749,0.00009484394,0.016244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96129894,0.03188979,0.0006403808,0.0020980793,0.0028746894,0.0011981728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724558,0.020876063,0.0014792175,0.002915648,0.0013426538,0.0009305854],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02698737,0.0010835066,0.0010598843,0.004883297,0.0069658635,0.013451535,0.0024818776,0.004629617,0.005715169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020880228,0.00054323586,0.0010514635,0.0046721334,0.046699475,0.015251778,0.007641071,0.0063602272,0.0008923583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001500512,0.0000032724538,0.000052735355,0.000008988077,0.0000028157901,0.0000059113963,0.0005855708,0.00027089368,0.0000034097259,0.99815935,0.00028648332,0.0006189831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048443344,0.0000037272885,0.00003642438,0.000020337917,0.0000012115017,0.000006253295,0.00021095766,0.00047466333,0.000006596926,0.99272037,0.0065124487,0.0000022295235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003136495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030606731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010317585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006829733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14272457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034366862","doi":"10.1007/s11229-008-9327-5","title":"Entitlement as a response to I–II–III scepticism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Wright; Entitlement (fair division); Presupposition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of language; Transcendental number; Metaphysics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07563051157642947,"score_gpt":0.28572125980669727,"score_spread":0.2100907482302678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034366862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13763061,0.0016152427,0.035969246,0.0889048,0.002137752,0.00024791274,0.00015175543,0.0002026854,0.7331399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713695,0.00022580146,0.004643392,0.0065303682,0.00026463394,0.0001556893,0.000042227828,0.00011968391,0.016648866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.985635,0.0077644056,0.0006874049,0.0019312254,0.0024705757,0.0015115099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733917,0.015970943,0.001998122,0.0036563573,0.0037794155,0.0012033895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015714,0.00039930083,0.0005294575,0.0023855225,0.007777765,0.009033635,0.002170524,0.005628333,0.008959493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045601744,0.00034745445,0.00066236884,0.0017884884,0.03133886,0.008647407,0.00625441,0.00945853,0.0011036358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019294646,0.000010518416,0.0003184617,0.000043063526,0.0000059827457,0.00014388183,0.029996727,0.00006672883,0.00022588995,0.9627344,0.0032424661,0.0031925342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031572716,0.000028513512,0.001160991,0.00038201935,0.000020943296,0.00027940964,0.04232755,0.0007390709,0.00096985186,0.83756506,0.11646142,0.000033613596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002780539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032367553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074061686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006831641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08310461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034894669","doi":"10.1177/0048393114550807","title":"Experts within Democracy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Rationality; Enthusiasm; GRASP; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Politics; Computer science; Theology","score_opus":0.12972467962030537,"score_gpt":0.3181099485397181,"score_spread":0.1883852689194127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034894669","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010431412,0.01825464,0.012407559,0.48703018,0.0057898564,0.000038091977,0.00006426719,0.00010580913,0.46587816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60925287,0.013171863,0.0053547383,0.0951072,0.006367687,0.000111979454,0.00007937368,0.00016794949,0.27038625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917018,0.0049107773,0.00018296526,0.00093292573,0.0012276019,0.0010439329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925202,0.004433016,0.00032875128,0.000409437,0.0009807285,0.001327782],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065465025,0.0003885916,0.00037520225,0.0012146437,0.0082749,0.008800741,0.0006224553,0.005708123,0.0116966525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0145362355,0.0002433247,0.00029519512,0.0008149729,0.012461971,0.010531546,0.0050718756,0.0075898594,0.0025602242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009410691,0.000008786665,0.00020172492,0.000029018414,0.0000020928715,0.00005759395,0.0030957449,0.00011308245,0.00007324278,0.9321163,0.05744308,0.0068498882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071885643,0.000008454235,0.00014164872,0.00014038618,0.0000021201824,0.00006865099,0.0025932456,0.00020656323,0.00014673056,0.39928058,0.5973964,0.000008062642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033497105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036155803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9917251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049536964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006159813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039129257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035535055","doi":"10.1163/221057012x627249","title":"Characterizing Skepticism’s Import","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Study of Skepticism","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Normative; Philosophy; Contextualism; Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.11097615490415554,"score_gpt":0.3498976499892086,"score_spread":0.23892149508505306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035535055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29996857,0.0020255225,0.04892532,0.03183466,0.0002686888,0.000081914906,0.00013677422,0.00011063476,0.616648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99408144,0.00031086156,0.0017823788,0.00079660397,0.00019683955,0.00003907779,0.00003965511,0.00003933773,0.002713852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815183,0.0051864455,0.0011307115,0.0019002464,0.008324604,0.0019395937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87341136,0.08359211,0.017707512,0.0084791845,0.013999784,0.0028100363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015871333,0.00045597935,0.00087710045,0.0055049416,0.0042909165,0.01841645,0.0017780209,0.005719181,0.006859537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07598638,0.00058194884,0.00087051635,0.0032269952,0.022902818,0.016240655,0.011547852,0.009509475,0.0009953543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008005182,0.000040949453,0.004251372,0.00007514674,0.000018464933,0.000317913,0.017694475,0.00023283117,0.0005621761,0.9687529,0.00090346264,0.0070701665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003797369,0.00006658732,0.0065801116,0.00029681352,0.000047827085,0.0007195102,0.009623561,0.0018991781,0.001582447,0.9507192,0.028379593,0.000047081958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096350966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060403976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01841645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059427987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003113426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08393663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037679592","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300003103","title":"Précis of<i>Philosophy and Its Epistemic Neuroses</i>","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05332798940969196,"score_gpt":0.2550589167077141,"score_spread":0.2017309272980221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037679592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012838571,0.011080656,0.022570502,0.1798828,0.0016885939,0.00003100993,0.00013063737,0.00014783516,0.77162933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91409904,0.0047515943,0.0073586702,0.017912896,0.001833234,0.00010750224,0.000092391034,0.00014893313,0.053695813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505866,0.0031958525,0.00015235497,0.00048826088,0.00075433915,0.00035066632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99344456,0.0038402337,0.00048625213,0.0009817369,0.0008097048,0.00043756847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006256304,0.0003347193,0.00041111946,0.0016546895,0.0064600916,0.012802488,0.00088676426,0.0037490095,0.008454468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009545788,0.00032238918,0.00063313387,0.0012946096,0.04639085,0.01099055,0.0044566016,0.0089022415,0.0015238277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070658302,0.000003191292,0.000047732374,0.00002078445,0.0000023556372,0.000021274724,0.002370926,0.000024841165,0.00004266678,0.99050575,0.0051474525,0.0018060025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057103944,0.000008752001,0.00023336722,0.00010163567,0.00000436512,0.000109235356,0.002211742,0.0001900897,0.00015443296,0.9353302,0.061642107,0.000008456714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033629283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027712185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012802488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051623606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041450467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037455678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041414122","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0149.2006.00402_4.x","title":"ALL THE WAY: SUBSTANTIVE SOURCE‐HISTORICISM FOR SEMI‐COMPATIBILISTS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Books","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Historicism; Computer science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Library science","score_opus":0.09671095972440064,"score_gpt":0.2774603926611459,"score_spread":0.18074943293674528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041414122","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022243133,0.0020122495,0.57619137,0.032284226,0.0009655375,0.00016735044,0.00023115073,0.00037120245,0.36553383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8751622,0.0006656723,0.093747206,0.002563234,0.00077976496,0.00056330784,0.00022506404,0.00056740607,0.025726233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938274,0.0036816702,0.0002748015,0.000944773,0.00087657326,0.00039467335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877324,0.0076412153,0.00042438164,0.0028283193,0.0010257635,0.00034784622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010530318,0.0006435559,0.0009133313,0.0018945643,0.006248565,0.007961931,0.0028879384,0.0045143655,0.014028813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026867285,0.0010054378,0.0012305352,0.0017052313,0.027624862,0.02436969,0.006811386,0.009700549,0.001519771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051390316,0.000003826616,0.0000190556,0.0000085977435,0.0000020711198,0.000007970852,0.0004008048,0.00007079697,0.000023358121,0.99789304,0.0004394023,0.0011259491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004944199,0.0000019548597,0.000013112155,0.000012569399,0.0000021462627,0.000008757432,0.00013764013,0.00026634897,0.00007317154,0.99549663,0.003980442,0.0000023806722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018506232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001953283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014028813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004577969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042924816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05569035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042031934","doi":"10.1007/s11098-008-9303-4","title":"Advice for fallibilists: put knowledge to work","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy of language; Pragmatism; Philosophy; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of science; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.3403526572243801,"score_gpt":0.3724533458028709,"score_spread":0.032100688578490855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042031934","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064881344,0.0012953093,0.0065242774,0.9242089,0.01772845,0.000109472756,0.00015959576,0.000697214,0.04862789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022552574,0.0020325193,0.04347362,0.6816673,0.01338792,0.0005177427,0.000533753,0.002254864,0.23357971],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890749,0.004148566,0.0013057549,0.0010552816,0.0026275932,0.00178805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9322763,0.027765656,0.0012978538,0.0043754955,0.02496732,0.009317304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018348917,0.0011431789,0.0019580352,0.004109498,0.015624233,0.011145884,0.004115529,0.03259955,0.12243458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09630577,0.0011140486,0.0019005681,0.002439972,0.008027384,0.028830031,0.008457627,0.025144402,0.041665647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005540541,0.0000498033,0.0002700969,0.00010427334,0.000009221008,0.00017023348,0.0018438807,0.000045664696,0.00013114828,0.02889098,0.9447538,0.023675503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006145841,0.000019820913,0.00022700691,0.0007193438,0.000021868664,0.0001451177,0.0045968904,0.00018255398,0.00024352568,0.06197543,0.9317591,0.000047751117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02262298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062392138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12243458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004455658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02022175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40958452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042069495","doi":"10.1007/s13164-012-0118-z","title":"On Robinson’s Response to the Self-Stultifying Objection","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Philosophy and Psychology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Qualia; Philosophy of mind; Premise; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Psychology; Metaphysics; Event (particle physics); Philosophy; Consciousness","score_opus":0.09678687586879149,"score_gpt":0.3562124627010008,"score_spread":0.25942558683220934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042069495","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00096725137,0.008652676,0.0017478118,0.96083385,0.00938508,0.000008449391,0.000024437142,0.000036165522,0.018344305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05491174,0.0041715046,0.0032900916,0.9014913,0.018419893,0.00007832432,0.00002240281,0.0002122149,0.017402494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808915,0.010664186,0.00094078004,0.0026870836,0.0037866028,0.0010298105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9621078,0.02894723,0.0012862377,0.001524565,0.0048951525,0.0012390366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019808237,0.00081200636,0.0015456341,0.0027845637,0.0052101216,0.009048322,0.0035238822,0.025004411,0.006001567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06543352,0.0005317666,0.0012713507,0.0016068806,0.038832217,0.016120993,0.00784628,0.03383532,0.0032736745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027298927,0.000010055604,0.00010249225,0.00009202798,0.00001811157,0.00020115064,0.0039453045,0.00008076195,0.00008734182,0.78637683,0.20424847,0.0048101246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004578491,0.000020178039,0.00017099756,0.0004098843,0.000016633021,0.00032120728,0.0031797658,0.00019565967,0.00024840192,0.41059518,0.5847314,0.000064994834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00701159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067521846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025004411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042950423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057799565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10475719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044703139","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0061","title":"Promises to the Self","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Epistemology; Reflexivity; Negativity effect; Philosophy; General interest; Contemporary philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.06033349264577125,"score_gpt":0.24681202057070065,"score_spread":0.1864785279249294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044703139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010015232,0.008279656,0.019848261,0.15471886,0.0017706812,0.00003101024,0.00010203486,0.0001629715,0.8050713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8388207,0.008377792,0.007392999,0.021683767,0.0022090084,0.0001354279,0.000109440065,0.00024293983,0.12102792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993533,0.003930089,0.000108645974,0.0005966455,0.0013153689,0.0005162106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99300236,0.0030925258,0.00052896736,0.0012708172,0.0013515374,0.0007538173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00791893,0.00040947553,0.00044599324,0.000823516,0.0077600367,0.00922163,0.0009704913,0.004120731,0.009370375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01600464,0.00033436783,0.0005579306,0.0008101441,0.02894861,0.014497978,0.005454557,0.007022225,0.003015494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064904148,0.0000033586293,0.000052372172,0.000020237441,0.0000025182599,0.000027029524,0.0026731542,0.00004229026,0.00004901229,0.9840024,0.010660432,0.0024606965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005854602,0.000013302216,0.00012761331,0.00017210908,0.0000072421794,0.000093345196,0.0036825489,0.00018407959,0.00020215742,0.6909072,0.30458996,0.000014615925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038708798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003279298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009370375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005237825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005764719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041879773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049149587","doi":"10.1353/cjs.2004.0043","title":"What do We Know about Knowledge? An Essay on the Knowledge Society","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heaven; Adam and Eve; Ignorance; Immortality; Tragedy (event); Paradise; Wife; Philosophy; Happiness; Cartesian anxiety; Sociology; Law; Environmental ethics; Aesthetics; Political sociology; Theology; Epistemology; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.07506628568583118,"score_gpt":0.2962703891615365,"score_spread":0.2212041034757053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049149587","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006470618,0.26253626,0.0016554972,0.5690092,0.01654622,0.000020980218,0.000044532993,0.000026427711,0.1495138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15864983,0.5079927,0.0027023174,0.13907972,0.06179047,0.00020480684,0.00021837333,0.00014280222,0.12921898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906094,0.005106402,0.00052569207,0.0006385946,0.002401913,0.00071789953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98102194,0.015164426,0.00067720393,0.00062205864,0.0017588106,0.00075550226],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009949209,0.0014370613,0.0012428204,0.00555162,0.010745077,0.017786728,0.0017057875,0.011754965,0.0049206475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013491795,0.0004825495,0.0008136569,0.0061865803,0.03823687,0.04440225,0.0062496313,0.011060753,0.0020674998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001410407,0.00004278696,0.00010271812,0.0004611073,0.000013214416,0.0002153977,0.020076673,0.00020102623,0.00007121376,0.6987302,0.23808195,0.041989658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004031052,0.0000081411235,0.00016489787,0.0015749333,0.000004903388,0.000085709245,0.0065173544,0.00009113753,0.000038936887,0.19243312,0.7990628,0.000014006269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010886579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007976795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98925495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014179003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016107121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102876365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049365968","doi":"10.1007/bf02380929","title":"Causes and causal explanations: Davidson and his critics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of language; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.11287014455721103,"score_gpt":0.2881848383726581,"score_spread":0.1753146938154471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049365968","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034599097,0.019769385,0.013999372,0.9225266,0.0045964876,0.000044042656,0.0001614431,0.0000811259,0.03536158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52004254,0.033115838,0.023083221,0.3724677,0.02591916,0.00045261663,0.0002472471,0.0004154105,0.024256188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841674,0.009068268,0.0009871372,0.0021573624,0.002992904,0.0006269421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8925219,0.093066946,0.0018878988,0.0030975877,0.008147168,0.0012785551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02280657,0.0011640127,0.0021474068,0.0066703376,0.0072769453,0.008929047,0.004753314,0.021614077,0.0034862426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08099774,0.0017639694,0.0015524847,0.003971091,0.04786619,0.011380868,0.005254119,0.028222589,0.0010786112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036988633,0.0000144841815,0.00036434783,0.00019445845,0.00004764159,0.00011606452,0.0033022156,0.0004642549,0.00001290244,0.9367032,0.053417306,0.0053261644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052623047,0.0000031826867,0.00013591848,0.00026000224,0.00003149622,0.000071947485,0.0012839066,0.00057370536,0.00006510609,0.9496427,0.047856156,0.000023222328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024901802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026928388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024901802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00875344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009674866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12061411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050757252","doi":"10.1080/05568641.2011.634242","title":"Reflective Knowledge and Epistemic Circularity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Papers","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy","score_opus":0.15729763265796753,"score_gpt":0.29259332251921844,"score_spread":0.1352956898612509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050757252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12473758,0.005600141,0.35858756,0.13378498,0.001208433,0.00021736385,0.00015058005,0.00028529708,0.37542805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97912025,0.0007135526,0.013300549,0.0019272206,0.0003308573,0.00010103153,0.00002689847,0.000038969367,0.0044406606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97692823,0.01345579,0.0010756704,0.0028014453,0.0043599606,0.001378944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9140047,0.06012781,0.0055307113,0.012188993,0.006714952,0.0014328174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025328381,0.0003777731,0.0008534237,0.002311466,0.0056494977,0.008394084,0.0018166379,0.004950975,0.004184719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064797096,0.0005917374,0.0010092893,0.001566624,0.07266925,0.016976714,0.009354308,0.0073319734,0.00052341586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007357542,0.0000070115625,0.00011968494,0.000025837466,0.0000048263764,0.00004652017,0.0018707409,0.00028261033,0.000037576945,0.995684,0.00035282772,0.0015610358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005251924,0.000003606907,0.00004548147,0.000042097192,0.000003100332,0.00003209012,0.00042557367,0.0004765565,0.000115809744,0.9936854,0.005158816,0.000006205808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002624381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011658364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025328381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005803201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060480377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13395089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051649935","doi":"10.5840/logos-episteme2014536","title":"What is the Permissibility Solution a Solution of? – A Question for Kroedel","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logos & Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.07862813190076014,"score_gpt":0.30829293183202927,"score_spread":0.22966479993126915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051649935","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025955908,0.010915813,0.27538374,0.56134963,0.0041966005,0.00014363763,0.00053470384,0.00036659732,0.12115343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6901814,0.006984015,0.23207843,0.034887515,0.005539364,0.00073702855,0.00055182044,0.00057267194,0.02846774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99226624,0.0038602324,0.0003905892,0.0017615354,0.0011967559,0.000524676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858246,0.009117529,0.0007554221,0.0015745154,0.0021740177,0.00055403943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00973444,0.00093078025,0.0016207041,0.0013271772,0.003951289,0.0058862115,0.0020844094,0.007912231,0.013801607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036307126,0.00068833644,0.001749936,0.0011359806,0.01643304,0.020089626,0.005069384,0.012329026,0.0029123735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017709153,0.000018548893,0.00007183865,0.00009184335,0.000015088876,0.000039003506,0.00023663782,0.000478453,0.00009408871,0.9853571,0.006647057,0.006932637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011069125,0.0000028171153,0.000017680062,0.000028254115,0.0000021302412,0.000023102975,0.000114456016,0.00041502077,0.000032821892,0.9937875,0.0055577825,0.000007394027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015643337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009656349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013801607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033631122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004713792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051481247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053724899","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x09000703","title":"Carruthers' marvelous magical mindreading machine","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Introspection; Confabulation (neural networks); Psychology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Theory of mind; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.128628256594198,"score_gpt":0.34023540806842895,"score_spread":0.21160715147423095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053724899","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08713511,0.001502217,0.5030835,0.018482968,0.0010390183,0.00016090888,0.0002570762,0.0036552101,0.38468397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8512279,0.00031665407,0.11801668,0.0010825222,0.00020580752,0.00011214261,0.00008242399,0.0002823823,0.028673595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983146,0.0006300408,0.00005956923,0.00038871792,0.00045736274,0.00014968519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940235,0.0035556427,0.00026818697,0.0012807889,0.00063170015,0.00024015446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020520496,0.00040155108,0.00047118982,0.0010545016,0.0019540463,0.004365034,0.0016266273,0.002270837,0.015065063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018757239,0.0003908549,0.00055978243,0.00038985224,0.010099278,0.008019542,0.0033216907,0.0018968866,0.002571735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004875095,0.000009617014,0.00020907311,0.000048591002,0.000008319023,0.00020207113,0.0014440485,0.0009292427,0.0014805251,0.97250956,0.004819248,0.01829086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021682421,0.000016698294,0.00010080756,0.00005110297,0.000008633368,0.00024070131,0.00026273527,0.012667614,0.002797577,0.9553359,0.028466254,0.000030144254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011520106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088615186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015065063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011231086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077346305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050397694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056414158","doi":"10.1007/s10670-007-9055-0","title":"The Two Faces of Evidentialism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Ontology; Philosophy of science","score_opus":0.061620227689477364,"score_gpt":0.31269785326664845,"score_spread":0.25107762557717106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056414158","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027756205,0.023527753,0.20710683,0.3884515,0.0024817516,0.000057365665,0.00029755736,0.00023026126,0.35009083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91511977,0.005843579,0.04284468,0.013528145,0.0046116235,0.0002694911,0.00013587395,0.00024720203,0.0173996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815523,0.011353848,0.0006710183,0.001674346,0.003911439,0.0008370194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95734805,0.032176875,0.0013105082,0.0052484856,0.0027331044,0.0011830854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023931786,0.0006064374,0.0020051864,0.0026363577,0.0055725006,0.012615186,0.0028806373,0.007157924,0.010568524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042128958,0.00081198505,0.0009826715,0.0015598201,0.055912543,0.031639595,0.008135137,0.013421927,0.0014336858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053084655,0.0000034468342,0.000021755015,0.000012779604,0.000001593866,0.0000064489864,0.00044749878,0.000030304456,0.0000132664,0.9973239,0.0008106731,0.0013230284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048788165,0.0000015391928,0.000029221412,0.000021944741,0.0000010544743,0.0000140620705,0.00024443862,0.00012398622,0.000019711404,0.99483514,0.0046999916,0.0000039709084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012885162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001237585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023931786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033882791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003073806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12656492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056506274","doi":"10.4000/etudes-benthamiennes.673","title":"Utilitarianism and Egoism in Sidgwickian Ethics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d’études benthamiennes","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical egoism; Utilitarianism; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07928877958811302,"score_gpt":0.2681040817411833,"score_spread":0.18881530215307024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056506274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031340368,0.020188317,0.12327085,0.12481206,0.0016966462,0.0000525103,0.00008205353,0.0000793176,0.69847786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88828385,0.00450503,0.023429722,0.010332246,0.0014816889,0.00016964278,0.000035403606,0.00013113905,0.07163127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935087,0.0045274976,0.00022798008,0.00051966886,0.00087077223,0.00034542684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969721,0.0019414849,0.00018800567,0.00030892482,0.00040935882,0.0001801853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057424987,0.00051739695,0.000375828,0.0013531013,0.0036724322,0.0054052332,0.0009494894,0.0035660402,0.0032640516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00646602,0.00030827575,0.00049945316,0.0013242194,0.028570937,0.00772545,0.003744408,0.004829039,0.00072836026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015285633,0.0000012559717,0.000020510763,0.0000058486285,6.1515766e-7,0.000007104945,0.00044630948,0.000045307308,0.000009868031,0.9977725,0.0008222403,0.00086679077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027600124,0.0000042671986,0.00005644185,0.000026538717,9.138258e-7,0.000018928853,0.00024308039,0.00016792127,0.00004943873,0.96551025,0.03391571,0.0000038386347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036439332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030282696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005907909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005907909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00241642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042865098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058766829","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-2567.2009.01037.x","title":"Epistemic Supervenience and Internalism: A Trilemma","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Supervenience; Trilemma; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.042286531527206475,"score_gpt":0.26228032594042844,"score_spread":0.21999379441322198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058766829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053870693,0.006348717,0.30061558,0.08092508,0.0010192181,0.00012077105,0.00028863805,0.00023906377,0.55657226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.949387,0.0025287555,0.032111112,0.0036390335,0.0013130464,0.00021939984,0.0001370238,0.000105671425,0.010558878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960295,0.0019623272,0.00023653473,0.00050968933,0.000895337,0.00036658108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98815584,0.008609745,0.0005945859,0.0009548153,0.0013303182,0.00035470517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006267428,0.00039001598,0.00095194957,0.0025161935,0.0026547129,0.005817645,0.0011204456,0.0037802695,0.0078645535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010082602,0.00044841346,0.0013898615,0.0018583772,0.021363692,0.014231789,0.005532798,0.008220009,0.0009417228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014943388,0.0000026634082,0.000023163662,0.0000107578635,0.0000014531942,0.000013163475,0.00014186134,0.000044564513,0.000024759882,0.99903464,0.00024706183,0.00045444057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036905578,0.0000027016179,0.000032570842,0.00001884506,0.0000021668893,0.000023211518,0.00007601131,0.0003975479,0.000043645334,0.99673176,0.0026652066,0.0000026710115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009214489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005490117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078645535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034368085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017641397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033145726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061227443","doi":"10.7202/004996ar","title":"Les arguments transcendantaux et le problème de la justification de la normativité morale","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.28823844220432837,"score_gpt":0.3745171775598076,"score_spread":0.08627873535547925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061227443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03278416,0.014257165,0.07504601,0.081439115,0.0017145069,0.00006285227,0.00008655186,0.00007843785,0.7945311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8830311,0.007072957,0.018197024,0.008467659,0.0009634827,0.0002561749,0.00006744044,0.00017786311,0.08176626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830225,0.009833266,0.00043985684,0.0014583342,0.004285882,0.00095999346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887609,0.007452956,0.0008198885,0.0009882898,0.0016080854,0.0003698023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012541678,0.00080773176,0.0009575462,0.0026507566,0.00631695,0.011120848,0.0016630746,0.0068940204,0.008438749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01876226,0.00045192454,0.0014244493,0.0018704828,0.044183988,0.010462681,0.0052445154,0.011386052,0.0011500606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036594527,0.0000023749603,0.000023523815,0.000015185233,0.0000024176204,0.000016625485,0.0009559396,0.00008776398,0.000022877079,0.9972926,0.00053772057,0.0010393115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008763699,0.000008380614,0.00014665737,0.00012262861,0.0000064924866,0.00003460674,0.0011541159,0.0003866958,0.000119739714,0.9495981,0.048404813,0.000009045615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0082181925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009206916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012541678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0100122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008549709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072643876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065056736","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqv014","title":"Moral Deference and Deference to an Epistemic Peer","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Morality; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.24432780029377044,"score_gpt":0.31490333800443804,"score_spread":0.0705755377106676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065056736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45349672,0.0022296866,0.123694204,0.06856796,0.0012531132,0.0001518762,0.000092643444,0.00029271725,0.35022104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932672,0.00013361598,0.0023104094,0.0010030096,0.00014513258,0.000023490567,0.0000089199175,0.0000156073,0.0030925705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97400314,0.013659226,0.0011414599,0.0030839427,0.0060109966,0.0021011436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91816854,0.038160708,0.010171488,0.011261232,0.016565692,0.0056724106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019542985,0.00040993717,0.0006571646,0.0017554582,0.00623566,0.0065551666,0.0016454502,0.0058448743,0.0034418032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10932956,0.0003667827,0.0006088574,0.0008485997,0.028479999,0.009796792,0.008563341,0.005481026,0.00051794644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006254438,0.000032943237,0.0032961306,0.000101094636,0.000024286974,0.0007435482,0.021390747,0.0003905033,0.00071709603,0.961863,0.0017040387,0.009674115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029751578,0.00010050212,0.0028262169,0.00016363806,0.000041251573,0.0010716986,0.00762449,0.0016093802,0.001059124,0.9572821,0.028132796,0.000059067224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026063207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014652517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019542985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024533651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034802395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103354394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065190707","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2006.00326.x","title":"UNDERDETERMINATION AND THE ARGUMENT FROM INDIRECT CONFIRMATION","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Underdetermination; Argument (complex analysis); Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Medicine","score_opus":0.0314890652546003,"score_gpt":0.230720348990048,"score_spread":0.1992312837354477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065190707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085392006,0.01020666,0.24306752,0.28598264,0.0029040182,0.0002674562,0.00022613075,0.0004787996,0.3714748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97200733,0.00085344864,0.010706002,0.01076014,0.0011946695,0.00018438735,0.000039189057,0.0000953125,0.004159555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93808055,0.041645847,0.0020600506,0.0049394723,0.011520674,0.0017534232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69439214,0.24569228,0.009895539,0.028556434,0.019115288,0.0023483038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046062317,0.00087230525,0.0016175791,0.004374928,0.0038145178,0.007239467,0.004305999,0.010339306,0.0095783705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16295974,0.0009419417,0.0013366623,0.0015411422,0.033787753,0.017608315,0.011793921,0.015202263,0.0014616366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007710745,0.000023640248,0.0006815265,0.00014065193,0.000042859778,0.0003036376,0.0013791268,0.00031931172,0.0001497252,0.9878563,0.0029583643,0.0060677645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007463636,0.000035083656,0.00031431112,0.00023892244,0.000037748152,0.00030753415,0.00042016737,0.0015981119,0.00070201146,0.97903717,0.01720519,0.00002910063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009531403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005647444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046062317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038884492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024528168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24360377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070710280","doi":"10.1163/174552412x628940","title":"Reasons, Answers, and Goals","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.11053687137056291,"score_gpt":0.27941504007924994,"score_spread":0.16887816870868705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070710280","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021561006,0.013413764,0.08803808,0.5577246,0.005667533,0.00022432013,0.00023672647,0.00018808847,0.3129459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82863677,0.00677679,0.047853246,0.07293512,0.0043521216,0.0013870179,0.00023060288,0.00035673985,0.03747166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9671814,0.021155577,0.001555876,0.0026714907,0.0053122193,0.0021233745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94841504,0.039194565,0.0032074288,0.0024517756,0.0047667106,0.001964497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03168161,0.000943903,0.0015186006,0.0035614565,0.007577775,0.016062537,0.0032937292,0.02002274,0.011503659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06706938,0.0010309952,0.0017501543,0.003114123,0.046747394,0.025405953,0.010846662,0.017866593,0.0023561867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028723085,0.00000796984,0.00011183032,0.000054394,0.0000046605123,0.00004784778,0.0029365185,0.00007284208,0.00003182884,0.9894164,0.005227549,0.0020592385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041670657,0.000038944512,0.00042997688,0.0005521376,0.000017801365,0.00013512165,0.012078701,0.0006551546,0.00027496106,0.86864203,0.117084175,0.00004938838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028379438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018304233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03168161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062364875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038132672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16755038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072056355","doi":"10.4148/biyclc.v5i0.288","title":"Intellect and Concept","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition Logic and Communication","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Individuation; Intellect; Epistemology; Extant taxon; Relevance (law); Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.056173331945422934,"score_gpt":0.28337148216393493,"score_spread":0.227198150218512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072056355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025144363,0.039837226,0.0271283,0.029721344,0.000851453,0.000059207137,0.00013774031,0.00013037707,0.87698996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9259025,0.015146179,0.012757563,0.0044771894,0.0013984728,0.00016067206,0.00016577313,0.00008029838,0.039911453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952727,0.0024818904,0.0002287742,0.000711415,0.0009876412,0.00031766543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99309206,0.0040706317,0.0007491016,0.00104631,0.00068162126,0.00036020868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006035859,0.00054089195,0.00062963285,0.0027267805,0.002669825,0.009350165,0.0011691465,0.002304452,0.007510489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009155376,0.00018585715,0.00045471863,0.0016712213,0.03543642,0.009217518,0.0050632115,0.002487269,0.0014377711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003632967,0.0000038364456,0.00016570809,0.00004071177,0.0000050641665,0.000027844526,0.0015623028,0.00008855877,0.000030857907,0.99088496,0.001081073,0.0061054733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005151296,0.0000074890977,0.00026908453,0.00007827305,0.0000027858734,0.000097052136,0.00046696913,0.00011149442,0.000035333695,0.9546671,0.044253554,0.000005745848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001445309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086798973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009350165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034974723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019775012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03192109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074407027","doi":"10.1080/00201740310002406","title":"Interpretation, Reasons, and Facts","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Coherentism; Intentionality; Doxastic logic; Epistemology; Appeal; Relation (database); Objectivity (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Nothing; Philosophy; Slogan; Subjectivism; Perception; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Foundationalism; Linguistics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08846054933456955,"score_gpt":0.2984510055341341,"score_spread":0.20999045619956458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074407027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031031972,0.03323561,0.10044069,0.14859965,0.0015353702,0.00007941832,0.0003153292,0.0002224387,0.68453944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9359065,0.009452396,0.023578426,0.0069711693,0.0008609414,0.00014178066,0.00021145777,0.00013436588,0.022742836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99321705,0.004160243,0.00027381052,0.0007666254,0.0011236754,0.00045860015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99435836,0.0039689015,0.00028494885,0.0006268298,0.00053764845,0.00022325486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067026634,0.00062663807,0.0008057645,0.002598496,0.0039406745,0.010820137,0.001302284,0.0037399959,0.0038028718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008361217,0.0005969222,0.0005260146,0.0017933344,0.048746657,0.013547709,0.0039394484,0.0047508334,0.000729803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004470589,0.000003366888,0.00008166828,0.000019672822,0.0000031614632,0.000027667298,0.0016986356,0.00006180439,0.000019647006,0.99493825,0.001317029,0.0018247509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053776653,0.0000022350373,0.000059553746,0.00004094584,0.0000029963803,0.000021720574,0.0011069635,0.00009165256,0.00003941717,0.97157073,0.027054783,0.0000036483527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046601105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004198885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010820137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057552946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003516638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041757762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075114051","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2265.2009.00484_12.x","title":"An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. By Dan O'Brien","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Heythrop Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Foundationalism; Skepticism; Internalism and externalism; Philosophy; Coherentism; Event (particle physics); Externalism; Subject (documents); Morality; Computer science","score_opus":0.037927122745135336,"score_gpt":0.28893753080564333,"score_spread":0.251010408060508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075114051","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005774291,0.6201972,0.017809425,0.053965706,0.009747871,0.000043673783,0.00057969545,0.00032575277,0.29675326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037444025,0.47979516,0.019924678,0.022214495,0.015064129,0.00036687698,0.001064455,0.00063392473,0.4234922],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998728,0.00043760266,0.000068586,0.00017538117,0.00048194075,0.0001085081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972722,0.0019971563,0.00013583907,0.00015885103,0.00026939492,0.00016649987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015214048,0.0014647578,0.001070153,0.0028953901,0.001941656,0.0058267815,0.001882969,0.003145744,0.04211771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041265814,0.0010914188,0.0011805625,0.0038532233,0.0073130312,0.011036556,0.002954788,0.006420277,0.020510873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028432514,0.00003490595,0.00019752234,0.0007618368,0.000022780725,0.00016237985,0.001416228,0.00042901386,0.00012199744,0.44705796,0.44897228,0.10079465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041301264,0.0000067018755,0.00017420559,0.00059229723,0.0000029197572,0.00012146592,0.00026284572,0.00013563508,0.000021822796,0.17338029,0.82528925,0.000008475285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042778123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056954366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04211771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033759852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034807026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14089781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075522519","doi":"10.1007/s11229-010-9713-7","title":"Clarity about concessive knowledge attributions: reply to Dodd","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Attribution; Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Pace; Psychology; Metaphysics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06596993155315543,"score_gpt":0.319403231354713,"score_spread":0.25343329980155754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075522519","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008812589,0.0020883998,0.0012897839,0.9881406,0.0024876164,0.000009391689,0.000044489392,0.000014137762,0.0050442955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18149342,0.005347878,0.007181719,0.7738404,0.023924414,0.00026351813,0.00016460329,0.00022200144,0.0075620413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770872,0.012009691,0.0018849757,0.0035116596,0.004537788,0.0009687693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66703,0.29715437,0.00425424,0.0090127215,0.019729376,0.0028192084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048197918,0.00091332966,0.00242284,0.0039887624,0.010934429,0.01211227,0.0055542663,0.04278955,0.009398515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20454061,0.0012024965,0.0010285773,0.0037451822,0.045161452,0.031168673,0.010069898,0.04655286,0.003037158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015377258,0.00004148375,0.00023544228,0.00043278723,0.00004835237,0.00033937366,0.022686714,0.00032707525,0.00017573091,0.64789695,0.31373674,0.013925662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015051407,0.000013404685,0.00032596412,0.0012813482,0.0000317649,0.00023356068,0.011485549,0.0005971603,0.0004885104,0.72111124,0.2641826,0.000098388016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008144468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063420488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048197918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013789463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012256338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25489795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078167306","doi":"10.1111/j.2153-960x.2012.00564.x","title":"Pragmatic Encroachment and Belief‐Desire Psychology","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytic Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Citation; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.10028205910449957,"score_gpt":0.3185657902363977,"score_spread":0.21828373113189814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078167306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11412124,0.0041040014,0.29405275,0.08579819,0.0006984091,0.00015057328,0.000091550726,0.00020793761,0.5007753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798052,0.00029976454,0.013004904,0.0014152956,0.00015867868,0.00009866444,0.000016957296,0.00006238625,0.0051381383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875607,0.0076526846,0.0003694993,0.0012091469,0.0024803802,0.0007275962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98074085,0.014191983,0.0010145784,0.002143386,0.0012249956,0.0006842156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011503962,0.0006110479,0.0010334152,0.0014688532,0.0052524745,0.0074081277,0.0020181283,0.0052228873,0.0062815505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021315156,0.00079409446,0.0010276247,0.0010801088,0.047603976,0.013795715,0.006188443,0.008273675,0.0004065665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007695647,0.000008711342,0.00004500055,0.000015461565,0.000004037654,0.000018000399,0.0012382814,0.0000759999,0.00005325317,0.9972905,0.00018798446,0.001055208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009319533,0.0000036704055,0.000038057336,0.000008167961,0.0000019191616,0.000016062158,0.00025749402,0.00032547995,0.000057934463,0.9980268,0.0012513612,0.0000036464746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022619232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020717839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011503962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005103887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039530597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060839534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080486303","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00137.x","title":"Knowing‐How and Knowing‐That","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Brown University","keywords":"Intellectualism; Epistemology; Need to know; Order (exchange); Statement (logic); Bit (key); Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Political science; Computer security; Business","score_opus":0.17355371187974125,"score_gpt":0.26546582326489543,"score_spread":0.09191211138515418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080486303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018263703,0.010100922,0.027667677,0.15810426,0.00087084016,0.000040214032,0.00012930665,0.00009344133,0.7847298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95010144,0.0048809038,0.004897954,0.010774665,0.0005243113,0.000051457762,0.00009497026,0.000054877473,0.028619502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99338245,0.004368615,0.00022671642,0.00065690506,0.0009225692,0.00044264595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985579,0.009626502,0.00087964314,0.0013652294,0.0017577576,0.0007918174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055116597,0.00042475984,0.00046614237,0.0015962085,0.004889334,0.009426627,0.0007072223,0.0036133325,0.009369774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012007272,0.00025497677,0.00035518405,0.00096661155,0.053595662,0.014447268,0.0040867906,0.005513173,0.0015467693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070686438,0.000011027033,0.00019033402,0.000030955885,0.000004132133,0.000037643196,0.004512012,0.00008976683,0.000035901954,0.98571825,0.004835727,0.0045272363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000660104,0.000008347838,0.00029387264,0.00018354759,0.0000061858636,0.00010158253,0.0043006884,0.00017642914,0.00016122192,0.8877171,0.10703273,0.0000116891615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056312396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027378781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009426627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004463309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042023975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03238374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081718739","doi":"10.3758/s13423-014-0683-5","title":"Knowledge and luck","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation; Wake Forest University; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Luck; Attribution; Psychology; Social psychology; Relation (database); Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.052838008806889165,"score_gpt":0.2934667803510117,"score_spread":0.24062877154412254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081718739","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019432327,0.4367238,0.007264516,0.09855608,0.0023389384,0.000031562253,0.00032429892,0.0000586513,0.43526986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70719737,0.21903008,0.0018751053,0.018255573,0.0028702288,0.000060412647,0.00029752287,0.000054405744,0.050359413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789655,0.0008384898,0.00011293378,0.00028031223,0.0006116291,0.00026008766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671656,0.0017974925,0.00042717016,0.00043292533,0.0003719887,0.0002538751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023486654,0.00029206646,0.00066483876,0.0019361455,0.0014638968,0.008054193,0.00072662154,0.0022904715,0.016126879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072080404,0.00020745936,0.0002923158,0.0018720147,0.018429058,0.009657315,0.0031069976,0.0028936684,0.0021608213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046372257,0.00003448063,0.0012069144,0.00090558047,0.000059592297,0.00015080799,0.0019123252,0.00028076122,0.000115378345,0.8530036,0.017094886,0.12518933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014185449,0.000022475882,0.0027445767,0.0020920297,0.000025671301,0.0003050539,0.0018292763,0.000081763304,0.00018518235,0.73473,0.2579473,0.00002245872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002686342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034412863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016126879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029202893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039203577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053949773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081725103","doi":"10.1163/187226311x582301","title":"Re-enacting in the Second Person","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Ascription; Operationalization; Epistemology; First person; Order (exchange); Medieval history; Point (geometry); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; History","score_opus":0.21465460513159007,"score_gpt":0.24942458198128184,"score_spread":0.03476997684969177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081725103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09520676,0.0028912262,0.13507108,0.03695832,0.0010046287,0.00015818879,0.000055317745,0.00033783843,0.72831666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9620986,0.00038364035,0.009642875,0.0018106297,0.000117441814,0.000058607926,0.0000249987,0.00010943357,0.025753744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98077685,0.012887585,0.00050823635,0.002243906,0.0023236403,0.0012598257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899963,0.0029971327,0.0009863143,0.0036710082,0.0015485776,0.0008006845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013349495,0.0007338487,0.00062928576,0.0014642447,0.005312825,0.01128211,0.0017832995,0.0064717443,0.0053595505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0104069095,0.00047185417,0.00078328274,0.000675819,0.045283325,0.016238019,0.011281928,0.0077265142,0.0009061244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010605226,0.000021453321,0.00017659117,0.000023518221,0.0000059223926,0.00014084246,0.036454078,0.00018334683,0.00028906908,0.95870256,0.0008495087,0.0031424705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016753746,0.00006323611,0.00038768243,0.00026969484,0.000017638331,0.0004970932,0.022784919,0.0014682191,0.001707367,0.76178825,0.21094945,0.00004970342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035889803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002470426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013349495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006906565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004811184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070599675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082214600","doi":"10.1086/392929","title":"Science, Biases, and the Threat of Global Pessimism","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Criticism; Race (biology); Order (exchange); Affect (linguistics); Population; Epistemology; Positive economics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.10292833158159341,"score_gpt":0.30666339277004234,"score_spread":0.20373506118844892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082214600","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14517142,0.017360216,0.015680647,0.6196057,0.0013587158,0.000056444253,0.00006461092,0.00008984892,0.20061241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95882154,0.003441554,0.0031715576,0.030540187,0.00078573765,0.000058754056,0.000014856995,0.00003722275,0.0031284764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9777539,0.015403106,0.0006381208,0.0014590032,0.0036853475,0.0010605174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91832644,0.066605054,0.004772659,0.0047117798,0.0039471798,0.001636907],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040186368,0.000535127,0.0008261506,0.0031446815,0.0058847805,0.011327182,0.0011682293,0.0065799495,0.002494342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056281686,0.0003859372,0.00051149406,0.0021924598,0.07547458,0.012361299,0.010781083,0.008648118,0.00033927461],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038026694,0.000018659,0.0027352262,0.0000890132,0.000033921715,0.00016692714,0.019567251,0.00045736143,0.000124898,0.9610059,0.0058996375,0.009863224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018791327,0.000013229524,0.0007789283,0.00014657377,0.000010908982,0.000082094135,0.004981997,0.00028156672,0.0001576629,0.9778616,0.015650284,0.000016467235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018119436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017342477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99411523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046418044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029227328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21252835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084171255","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00497.x","title":"Critical Notice of Robert C Roberts and W. Jay Wood, <i>Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Citation; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.3215027559344425,"score_gpt":0.37207324825664984,"score_spread":0.05057049232220734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084171255","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015148701,0.00440414,0.0001334256,0.96893007,0.02434391,0.000017546718,0.000065856664,0.000013873265,0.0019397051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007673928,0.004615176,0.00043510518,0.9217826,0.04858759,0.00018022425,0.00005427511,0.00010384695,0.01656722],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855224,0.0057274187,0.0009454523,0.0025036742,0.0042212433,0.0010796648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93126327,0.05182286,0.001965206,0.0013354105,0.011610837,0.002002411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018520873,0.0020642527,0.0027669603,0.002509455,0.015466834,0.013535524,0.007534344,0.033925347,0.009920027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06474303,0.001115816,0.001789286,0.0026520013,0.021283139,0.016753845,0.006660758,0.050123964,0.0034422036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014206489,0.000007317562,0.000038792015,0.00007767017,0.000004648536,0.000072850344,0.001820565,0.000021448848,0.000039013394,0.016151322,0.9806435,0.0011086587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028492048,0.000008178623,0.00046096946,0.0005637191,0.000012473743,0.00009187221,0.005395612,0.00010980867,0.00014612025,0.020594964,0.9725357,0.000052027142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06714029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10507412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06714029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013180605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014563699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13349897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085234070","doi":"10.1007/s13347-012-0088-1","title":"Book Symposium on Expertise: Philosophical Reflections By Evan Selinger Automatic Press/VIP, VINCE INC. PRESS 2011","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Technology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of technology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of science","score_opus":0.07134869010974274,"score_gpt":0.3006192835595315,"score_spread":0.22927059344978876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085234070","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014782218,0.44581327,0.0024768037,0.3811583,0.019454375,0.000010152894,0.0002131339,0.00007095102,0.1493247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.085160494,0.35818154,0.0043284968,0.058541086,0.025183644,0.00006595459,0.00030607102,0.00033219368,0.46790054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964714,0.00012738857,0.000016980768,0.00006442877,0.000106845364,0.000037226866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859565,0.0008510814,0.000039481412,0.000048744994,0.00031245552,0.00015246117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010538734,0.00064432,0.00060368405,0.0019019679,0.0022247222,0.004482289,0.00091946305,0.0037699866,0.022305015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021568679,0.00039372736,0.00033298053,0.0023570724,0.004210365,0.008606275,0.0017425499,0.005065273,0.00679816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009904714,0.000011085836,0.000060344,0.00009979262,0.0000043382342,0.000032837415,0.0009359892,0.00010738498,0.000059474325,0.08581702,0.891956,0.02090581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035293504,0.000003419123,0.00017466153,0.00026539856,0.0000028304926,0.00006326811,0.0007068715,0.000052287494,0.000042360145,0.029464414,0.96921563,0.0000052309515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063409973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013555548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022305015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002939957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026000128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074617684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089261701","doi":"10.1007/s11406-012-9395-0","title":"Sure the Emperor Has No Clothes, but You Shouldn’t Say That","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Absurdity; Assertion; Utterance; Emperor; Philosophy of language; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Philosophy of mind; Focus (optics); Metaphysics; Linguistics; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.2419071922481962,"score_gpt":0.2869433213110515,"score_spread":0.045036129062855285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089261701","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048101745,0.012300948,0.01142733,0.66349405,0.03114308,0.00003848231,0.00018275158,0.0003024808,0.2763007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19118746,0.0062877056,0.0117217945,0.3231225,0.009042849,0.00010821154,0.00019152065,0.00091110304,0.45742685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956067,0.0016890385,0.00019261794,0.00077039725,0.0013493667,0.00039185124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99368894,0.0019509037,0.0004317962,0.0010040429,0.0021131046,0.0008112135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054094777,0.00077,0.001038039,0.00073853595,0.008236429,0.0077733286,0.0010925105,0.0071795834,0.030574372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025233662,0.00053567585,0.000727394,0.00048130937,0.02065844,0.016430752,0.0033327516,0.019890398,0.016798511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008941167,0.000038979793,0.0006959315,0.0001826292,0.000049977687,0.00020732323,0.007385597,0.00008985352,0.00084052957,0.54257834,0.42698684,0.020854585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020391702,0.000029862076,0.0007673898,0.0004289324,0.000016922173,0.00034584745,0.008281975,0.00013177148,0.000601188,0.15539116,0.83392984,0.000054775526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005634113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059295176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030574372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019520369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023625037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10228151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091924307","doi":"10.1007/s11098-009-9459-6","title":"In support of anti-intellectualism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dalhousie University; University of Arizona; Arizona State University","keywords":"Intellectualism; Epistemology; Action (physics); Philosophy of language; Philosophy of mind; Need to know; Metaphysics; Relation (database); Descriptive knowledge; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.18983973861417305,"score_gpt":0.35220347464032226,"score_spread":0.1623637360261492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091924307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024457878,0.0049867737,0.0137379365,0.40949464,0.002861471,0.000037247086,0.00007374444,0.000078659505,0.5442717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91354334,0.0015651239,0.0041976925,0.052044407,0.0037850705,0.00013060418,0.00004928708,0.000120149874,0.024564322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845471,0.008012516,0.0004797994,0.0020164796,0.0037038228,0.0012402593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9405239,0.03919707,0.0029622961,0.0073534404,0.007849861,0.0021133379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021829972,0.0004955088,0.0008246145,0.0027531516,0.0074445587,0.011647937,0.002308011,0.006979436,0.008656977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042122863,0.00024161446,0.00060617336,0.0014062077,0.067787685,0.010030792,0.0065261154,0.016029583,0.0010537851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010359263,0.000008155417,0.000109002416,0.000021850561,0.0000053170133,0.000018103541,0.0017773625,0.000023230717,0.000026113667,0.99364144,0.0031658954,0.0011931629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026666818,0.000008173602,0.00032497648,0.00010304381,0.000007765616,0.00007010618,0.0018448777,0.0002073504,0.00019158296,0.9344671,0.06274108,0.000007419946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022495238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021559761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021829972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004825836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054806494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11544931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092885606","doi":"10.7202/011874ar","title":"Introspection, déploiement et simulation","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Introspection; Epistemology","score_opus":0.3392743951598934,"score_gpt":0.40782064332993007,"score_spread":0.06854624817003668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092885606","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12267226,0.0058885626,0.45944473,0.01976734,0.0007818265,0.00016569167,0.00018572829,0.0011311654,0.38996273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91102076,0.0021321576,0.05815994,0.0013942682,0.00014028436,0.00017016128,0.000128581,0.00025004742,0.026603809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952447,0.0030590575,0.00012060872,0.00067197264,0.0006526491,0.00025090695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925525,0.00445854,0.0005308721,0.0017039,0.00042745585,0.00032664498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00380658,0.0007264879,0.0005031564,0.0008227598,0.0011093271,0.00558874,0.0013637884,0.0018821185,0.0067904466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010697108,0.0005324221,0.0012086078,0.0006276626,0.018334864,0.007305157,0.0045317216,0.003481958,0.0010295277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045916568,0.00003075208,0.000707072,0.00012963726,0.000025424079,0.00007461173,0.004253481,0.0027410365,0.0005769536,0.9766797,0.0012192688,0.01351622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042975815,0.00007218644,0.00081115164,0.0002141181,0.000026602193,0.0001602093,0.0015680664,0.0072520655,0.0021190275,0.9370799,0.050599847,0.000053970463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023388613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017128321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067904466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031862478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025382726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0231179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094094968","doi":"10.7202/1026681ar","title":"Value Monism, Richness, And Environmental Ethics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Pluralism (philosophy); Value pluralism; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Value theory; Anthropocentrism; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03679093419942407,"score_gpt":0.24592093855210054,"score_spread":0.20913000435267648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094094968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.116483144,0.011349447,0.13869457,0.08645695,0.0004306308,0.0000641407,0.00008008135,0.00011852719,0.6463225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843783,0.00096083665,0.00623405,0.0016156521,0.00020440835,0.00003834439,0.000013566129,0.000028164415,0.006526658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950113,0.0034153184,0.000099989775,0.00030815412,0.00079576485,0.00036945427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957195,0.0027952043,0.0003875505,0.00046221705,0.00031521008,0.00032023134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052323425,0.00033883034,0.00038861975,0.0012061576,0.0030062487,0.005592441,0.00077021134,0.00235788,0.002637242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040968894,0.00023433012,0.0004651082,0.0007539413,0.040135663,0.008081898,0.0056378227,0.0028092128,0.0002270581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039236998,0.000004428809,0.00012459383,0.000015420663,0.0000025762035,0.000014861918,0.00053993287,0.00017501894,0.000046144098,0.9972281,0.00038989674,0.0014551249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034384836,0.000005082079,0.00012603309,0.000027283848,0.0000021845622,0.000029643747,0.00053435285,0.00031638003,0.00007370666,0.99169266,0.0071859583,0.0000033390459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015440506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002448336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005592441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043195947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022682662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031341016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098052878","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i1.3938","title":"In Defence of Virtue: The Legitimacy of Agent-Based Argument Appraisal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh; Florida Institute of Technology","keywords":"Virtue; Argumentation theory; Ambiguity; Argument (complex analysis); Fallacy; Epistemology; Legitimacy; Criticism; Philosophy; Epistemic virtue; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05033415478823391,"score_gpt":0.2871719785788954,"score_spread":0.2368378237906615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098052878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044619177,0.006129868,0.34723237,0.1320335,0.0027617083,0.00024175641,0.00012439628,0.00048579538,0.46637142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9408834,0.0008125441,0.0457646,0.00291819,0.0012523521,0.00024256753,0.00006065374,0.00017355602,0.007892028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94364226,0.03793605,0.0024525388,0.0042598275,0.01035899,0.0013504145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7696859,0.18417889,0.009642144,0.019924602,0.013938537,0.0026299153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06227085,0.0007038842,0.0017833053,0.0060599428,0.004830079,0.019908527,0.0038015386,0.011619515,0.010321614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22450238,0.0007692571,0.0012290336,0.0024162026,0.039509807,0.024372457,0.010186337,0.010333817,0.0017446397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002946677,0.000010298443,0.0003104697,0.000076934266,0.000015586025,0.00006893167,0.0019995407,0.00028372926,0.00010899457,0.98829865,0.0016193971,0.007178011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027852317,0.000008335001,0.00013391559,0.000113965696,0.000008342779,0.00005481349,0.00030115407,0.0023092674,0.0001479112,0.9867098,0.010173367,0.000011296729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009772801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009318619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06227085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004453195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042530578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32932365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098137601","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.432","title":"In Defense of the Objective Epistemic Approach to Argumentation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":153,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Fallacy; Subjectivism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07432956683130892,"score_gpt":0.2587859281955193,"score_spread":0.1844563613642104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098137601","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015337356,0.003164307,0.6289083,0.0526822,0.001295621,0.00012006431,0.00012039143,0.00016882185,0.29820302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84987456,0.0028622996,0.10513332,0.013110013,0.0026863876,0.00059654936,0.00014053748,0.0002469004,0.025349388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9735231,0.014747844,0.0013729128,0.002214115,0.0072090635,0.00093291805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736007,0.01536121,0.002586891,0.0039899903,0.0035146016,0.0009465622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02495793,0.00089291245,0.0010674141,0.003107225,0.00457175,0.011231409,0.0032696708,0.007885734,0.0049241553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029883083,0.0005697466,0.0017579092,0.0018734087,0.024354741,0.015333567,0.008016862,0.011157605,0.0011766825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036012507,0.0000040107093,0.000060934068,0.000025155663,0.000006505537,0.0000112413,0.00029386245,0.0001923822,0.000023088714,0.99766433,0.00028855706,0.0014262042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010405549,0.000010207451,0.00007940823,0.000103265076,0.0000103399925,0.0000460162,0.00018082684,0.0010011286,0.00009118631,0.9817446,0.01671522,0.000007474043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010646096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013414532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02495793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003946756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039563486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13199168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098314264","doi":"","title":"Disaffiliation in associations and the ousting of John","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hts Teologiese Studies-theological Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4210701432112357,"score_gpt":0.36059742249420684,"score_spread":0.06047272071702886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098314264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11041892,0.002975846,0.0054508606,0.066004075,0.0009156675,0.000035893874,0.000025885558,0.000040784216,0.8141321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9483765,0.0005395495,0.00057224854,0.0031579912,0.00015912058,0.000018953095,0.0000070173487,0.000041868374,0.047126725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888833,0.0063353255,0.00031520228,0.0014845396,0.0012191952,0.0017624403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846032,0.009243638,0.0012480371,0.001845088,0.0014983702,0.0015616375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010855799,0.00030742958,0.00058156735,0.0017413335,0.02917181,0.015011292,0.0014785356,0.005291843,0.011517944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026861714,0.00050208374,0.00027253293,0.0021306805,0.067095496,0.014864068,0.011599057,0.007740283,0.0010181565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002427409,0.000013423872,0.00063360325,0.000017677046,0.000003867307,0.00016899638,0.05894665,0.000035710014,0.000040294035,0.9295632,0.0052648117,0.0052875075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018278815,0.000020641817,0.0012673967,0.0001822888,0.000016617483,0.0004520106,0.08799142,0.00031364014,0.00036841756,0.6372431,0.27208695,0.000039281233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024657616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037612233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02917181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061314483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007432551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05741161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099752566","doi":"10.1111/j.1520-8583.2009.00160.x","title":"MODERATE DEONTOLOGY AND MORAL GAPS<sup>1</sup>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Perspectives","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Deontological ethics; Citation; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.07834119569037902,"score_gpt":0.29021388256236574,"score_spread":0.21187268687198674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099752566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10226865,0.003345561,0.047715086,0.086675525,0.0008460759,0.00007985204,0.00023649071,0.000091470094,0.7587414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98185456,0.0005176936,0.0045588547,0.0028474438,0.00031058595,0.00013592104,0.0000662444,0.000066172164,0.009642494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906256,0.004759825,0.0004620932,0.001395943,0.0015409159,0.001215691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97944266,0.013077953,0.0013773083,0.0027952308,0.002063435,0.0012434425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014039918,0.0005183393,0.0010650195,0.0017893849,0.0074399943,0.010175352,0.0019428374,0.0056758844,0.01177741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02131076,0.0004251887,0.00083352055,0.0016650495,0.03773435,0.017848004,0.0117961,0.01034057,0.00073836313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045370366,0.0000041648723,0.000040962943,0.000009630846,0.0000010478993,0.000007128733,0.0007910718,0.000023307772,0.00002042729,0.9983302,0.00027057366,0.00049698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043119826,0.0000034122106,0.00012459757,0.000027333595,0.0000020486925,0.000018952125,0.0012504676,0.000076195836,0.0000623293,0.9921497,0.0062776892,0.0000028750442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021392107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028102454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014039918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007068439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005466236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074251056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099848887","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-2567.2007.tb01210.x","title":"Evidentialism and the Numbers Game1","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02890549949402321,"score_gpt":0.2690204381239677,"score_spread":0.24011493862994449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099848887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2117507,0.0029620433,0.22477467,0.034360632,0.000498924,0.00017014053,0.00029260368,0.00016223933,0.52502805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787765,0.00034247333,0.010524091,0.00056927186,0.000105857194,0.000078295605,0.000048546233,0.000020801286,0.009534179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611557,0.0023336716,0.00018692309,0.0004043423,0.0006471343,0.00031232458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98899055,0.008764431,0.0006617816,0.0004491087,0.0007037409,0.00043038148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053207157,0.0004115414,0.00058345165,0.00077123917,0.0019296877,0.0037904473,0.0011091616,0.0019275501,0.0070556696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010452422,0.00026990444,0.00071398926,0.00059840665,0.00908691,0.0066750813,0.0024903552,0.0031853772,0.00053459476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000107740025,0.0000066040416,0.000051537918,0.000013746046,0.0000023376356,0.000018153763,0.00009552627,0.00055697566,0.00003462092,0.9980422,0.00031908453,0.0008483005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009879299,0.0000038145306,0.000041225343,0.000007749693,0.0000014723375,0.000011087137,0.000043694556,0.0018063257,0.00003419119,0.9960741,0.001963937,0.000002720346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023031258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023157727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070556696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036283368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017374925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028138936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100332354","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12147","title":"Intuition Fail: Philosophical Activity and the Limits of Expertise","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Skepticism; Philosophical methodology; Philosophical theory; Cognition; Philosophy of mind; Psychology; Philosophy; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.3433338980840962,"score_gpt":0.3786579380425524,"score_spread":0.03532403995845618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100332354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58928573,0.0068421853,0.102660865,0.08322011,0.00036670675,0.000091485155,0.00010446388,0.00022624338,0.21720222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950612,0.00028659028,0.0031507874,0.0007689614,0.000056411016,0.000030149753,0.000011610781,0.000021278445,0.0006128929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9504247,0.03346119,0.001806821,0.004003824,0.008805549,0.0014979644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6549436,0.29318517,0.013711804,0.023196468,0.011685266,0.0032776792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055939984,0.00043111833,0.0008409783,0.002627126,0.0034331637,0.009370702,0.0017244328,0.0042330725,0.0032726603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21135962,0.00060098246,0.0005977457,0.0013975145,0.05133382,0.02300985,0.01255412,0.0060556503,0.00046668013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019275038,0.00009261309,0.012176519,0.00027107476,0.00007158489,0.00025332475,0.061226524,0.002315768,0.0010001933,0.87942266,0.0026398934,0.04033713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004241399,0.00005943189,0.004050689,0.00020051283,0.000013999006,0.00020582182,0.008816779,0.0025130715,0.00058209366,0.975568,0.007911261,0.000035860325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013560221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060025824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055939984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00286911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002769514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29584247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101406057","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.008","title":"Lay denial of knowledge for justified true beliefs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":275,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Denial; Psychology; Attribution; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09085125245716436,"score_gpt":0.2885738848519348,"score_spread":0.19772263239477045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101406057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108419016,0.0048460574,0.22794582,0.1662722,0.0019044206,0.00017679863,0.0004397537,0.0002841686,0.48971182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97690475,0.00061636546,0.012978252,0.0033399907,0.00074607617,0.00011817706,0.0001362583,0.00006368957,0.0050963396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98287106,0.00807216,0.0010622919,0.0026341232,0.003886787,0.0014735985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93133426,0.042066094,0.0040974463,0.0122931115,0.0082439,0.0019650697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017236775,0.0006682137,0.0016330011,0.00318449,0.0045795906,0.008650305,0.0028413679,0.009619218,0.012441993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07551217,0.0009872881,0.0016108993,0.0013696698,0.039312724,0.01747242,0.0062471856,0.011883659,0.0014255355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029804765,0.000017161035,0.00021323685,0.00005696757,0.000020842986,0.00007514299,0.0011575049,0.00018248997,0.00007764978,0.9952325,0.001027662,0.0019089789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011887217,0.0000035128323,0.00009920228,0.000035844223,0.0000066567063,0.00004000493,0.0002764028,0.00039439232,0.00008835358,0.9973846,0.0016528858,0.000006182346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002493668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00213658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017236775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060592303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004772069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09115785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104601679","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2009.tb00088.x","title":"The Solution to the Surprise Exam Paradox","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surprise; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Wright; Epistemology; Psychology; History; Social psychology; Medicine; Art history","score_opus":0.06441762251572031,"score_gpt":0.26277322146600063,"score_spread":0.19835559895028032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104601679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14032666,0.002934795,0.20220338,0.20018359,0.0035174878,0.00010340315,0.00027718933,0.00091549376,0.44953808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96309406,0.00057743053,0.009987081,0.007558415,0.0006763848,0.00006569634,0.00006254051,0.00013391627,0.017844481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99553216,0.00213037,0.00020639767,0.0005581066,0.0011127769,0.0004601445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98685443,0.0067920946,0.00087795616,0.002436412,0.0019442221,0.0010948578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058185887,0.00035510265,0.0008527312,0.0008692945,0.0028697334,0.003953392,0.0016106004,0.0057742293,0.014302395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03397998,0.00038786934,0.00061147107,0.0006925942,0.010215161,0.008999749,0.006801357,0.005984371,0.0013720238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032867774,0.00001827496,0.00024057507,0.000032136046,0.000005167787,0.00021702168,0.00039720145,0.000386366,0.00012721027,0.9868542,0.006569873,0.005119097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001748204,0.0000087837425,0.000108222186,0.000020145611,0.0000028785032,0.00012288633,0.00026434718,0.0009882291,0.00012338317,0.9850043,0.013330487,0.000008677204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009887114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014302395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021754887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028228087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047846317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105313662","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6253.2012.01747.x","title":"Replying to Armour:Certainty and Exceptionalism: Threats to a World-Humanities?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Chinese Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; Certainty; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Sociology; Natural (archaeology); Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.1138904025636839,"score_gpt":0.32557878138412694,"score_spread":0.21168837882044303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105313662","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035960705,0.0015947578,0.0011299913,0.98699236,0.002428208,0.000003161551,0.000008023144,0.000015583515,0.0042319205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39367276,0.004382677,0.0021174906,0.5749401,0.014060933,0.000055181863,0.000019699828,0.00010467404,0.010646547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99022406,0.005821115,0.00031930994,0.0012647419,0.0017778508,0.0005929355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9441698,0.045684036,0.0029510087,0.0014101553,0.003992869,0.0017921404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016005691,0.0004255171,0.0009447221,0.0011587075,0.008159925,0.010148248,0.002326744,0.021922158,0.0040488583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057924435,0.00034389977,0.00055496185,0.0015933978,0.02341977,0.015931124,0.0075037917,0.029303003,0.0010995965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108079825,0.000031800908,0.0013784418,0.00018215433,0.000049306847,0.001106711,0.041078836,0.00030436006,0.00039034084,0.65187424,0.28635618,0.017139556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047007878,0.000049305618,0.0011462052,0.00048406984,0.000035492205,0.0007198498,0.037267428,0.0012617803,0.0006450138,0.493187,0.46499255,0.00016412823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065544555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038128688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021922158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048668217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036640079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08464724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105991975","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2010.01636.x","title":"Mental Causation: The Mind‐Body Problem. By Anthony Dardis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Citation; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Library science; Epistemology; Computer science; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.035612631576947065,"score_gpt":0.2596950115166866,"score_spread":0.22408237993973956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105991975","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012838194,0.3701626,0.003120397,0.5824707,0.0152548235,0.000014437563,0.00007186985,0.000035356334,0.027586006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19466884,0.45346847,0.0076343226,0.18135524,0.07792796,0.00025941845,0.00018585668,0.00020939359,0.08429052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988996,0.0005850667,0.00004848111,0.00017794405,0.0002336754,0.000055320987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942714,0.005017941,0.00015869585,0.00010586808,0.00026436133,0.00018183311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026860493,0.0011561876,0.001264808,0.0018342641,0.0029568188,0.0045718867,0.0012488426,0.0051854043,0.0041124616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00844736,0.0008409815,0.000554189,0.0019189306,0.013583211,0.009598172,0.0032702163,0.013529972,0.00133904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004480343,0.000023707713,0.00021306584,0.000335772,0.000028875202,0.0001813838,0.0024258797,0.00040719725,0.00009421086,0.55109483,0.41654137,0.028608924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002274934,0.00001274534,0.00039555266,0.0006859376,0.000011837406,0.00033186562,0.0011395578,0.0005997327,0.00008058361,0.58932406,0.40737182,0.000023595505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042434884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037687833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051854043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002111564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001900069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015320599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107055168","doi":"10.1017/s0012217313000681","title":"Interests, Disagreement and Epistemic Risk","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Order (exchange); Subject (documents); Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03619910133377254,"score_gpt":0.2299125579139815,"score_spread":0.19371345658020894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107055168","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09375446,0.005743899,0.41950953,0.074431844,0.00053885346,0.00018054021,0.00014307577,0.000092339666,0.40560558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822404,0.00055711996,0.011632409,0.001238708,0.00025324107,0.00011083612,0.000025002815,0.000022100941,0.0039201425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96521807,0.02215263,0.0014852649,0.003430024,0.0061946325,0.0015193926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93557596,0.049619455,0.004967143,0.0042862594,0.0043455795,0.0012055166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037008803,0.00071627944,0.0011483938,0.0034893882,0.0044728727,0.008993938,0.0023243565,0.0076722726,0.0069093495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062956125,0.00052241125,0.0010746184,0.0021501551,0.032740362,0.02167661,0.00839961,0.007007746,0.000628441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074888326,0.000005655213,0.0001509069,0.000015532783,0.000005592538,0.000022534769,0.0006493638,0.00028467324,0.00002342233,0.99730456,0.00013868957,0.0013914491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067896103,0.000005049355,0.000079091864,0.000024049918,0.0000034724499,0.000026919815,0.00032393876,0.0006274287,0.000043428834,0.99683595,0.0020185425,0.0000053611266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011080988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066764175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037008803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005165851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025478483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1957236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107553779","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2006.0011","title":"Motivating the Relevant Alternatives Approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Core (optical fiber); Philosophy; General interest; Positive economics; Contemporary philosophy; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.06275002607445239,"score_gpt":0.22920596469630186,"score_spread":0.1664559386218495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107553779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021539994,0.008347503,0.115472116,0.18491839,0.0015539506,0.00019087188,0.00015460902,0.00008906673,0.66773343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8975079,0.003983345,0.048538964,0.017384792,0.0016915214,0.00034248343,0.0000900384,0.0001274429,0.030333396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871617,0.009225785,0.00024063488,0.0010173096,0.0016568075,0.0006977206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979228,0.016611777,0.00058257265,0.0010002679,0.001743241,0.0008339454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016017968,0.00074436906,0.0009199546,0.0019486137,0.0058748215,0.0075078593,0.0021044041,0.0067227697,0.011375204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023225477,0.0004458693,0.0010296499,0.0012453598,0.030667424,0.013241737,0.0059827142,0.009366215,0.0016041144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005466763,0.000007748615,0.00003566913,0.000015621465,0.0000018899259,0.00004274605,0.00041546565,0.000121962876,0.00001620725,0.99648464,0.0013612874,0.0014913024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066500365,0.0000029063663,0.000026952688,0.000031636268,0.000001810501,0.0000216209,0.00036974097,0.00042660747,0.00003063308,0.9844737,0.014603847,0.000003911917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043194676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045215865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016017968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063995775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004613444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08471215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110946410","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00015.x","title":"Agent Reliabilism, Subjective Justification, and Epistemic Credit","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Order (exchange); Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0411197691073327,"score_gpt":0.23919623394467543,"score_spread":0.19807646483734273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110946410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1745213,0.003747618,0.36996895,0.056803375,0.00051496935,0.00016054095,0.00021054856,0.00030140096,0.39377132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901265,0.0002330429,0.0061654453,0.00056442444,0.00014326758,0.00005430476,0.000022926946,0.000029919833,0.0026602598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915863,0.005265355,0.00033699156,0.00075030595,0.0015474847,0.00051355973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94457954,0.039410822,0.0036112955,0.0057943705,0.0052394676,0.0013644446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014442021,0.00043842744,0.0009314167,0.0021278164,0.001974697,0.0057508624,0.0015618125,0.0046281954,0.005932532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04407338,0.0003786462,0.0006229734,0.0013861748,0.02170278,0.0082728695,0.0042788954,0.004911664,0.00045314315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075400553,0.000009154041,0.00019962952,0.000015796972,0.000005992807,0.000026086092,0.00024062883,0.00058017566,0.000036330763,0.9969657,0.00033734806,0.0015757537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010618264,0.0000042353113,0.0001477142,0.000024032639,0.0000035853755,0.000018697907,0.00006021017,0.0017268792,0.0000685167,0.99573225,0.002197306,0.0000058637834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002281103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020897584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014442021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033102932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024405282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07637763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113518045","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i3.455","title":"Evaluating Inferences: the Nature and Role of Warrants","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Inference; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14724920243985806,"score_gpt":0.32551370930484225,"score_spread":0.17826450686498418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113518045","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15222265,0.014350658,0.68608075,0.07012465,0.0008162578,0.00042825032,0.0005787864,0.0007450606,0.07465287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90508264,0.0022278535,0.088300765,0.0011149243,0.0008883832,0.00017793609,0.00011449479,0.00015480658,0.0019382322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9307364,0.041768793,0.0062544807,0.0058482317,0.013689219,0.0017028548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44978526,0.4892911,0.024856033,0.017873233,0.016185254,0.0020091229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08939313,0.0010168809,0.0020638392,0.007170137,0.003532486,0.01404586,0.0034986523,0.006750058,0.0046883817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4254003,0.0018862778,0.0015259592,0.00437358,0.026750805,0.04062075,0.0064049684,0.005472188,0.000602241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014401082,0.000027557648,0.0027653992,0.00030197523,0.00009552106,0.00024496648,0.0034777676,0.0031142195,0.0002950934,0.9543368,0.0012675024,0.03392922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003105493,0.000031848118,0.0006617193,0.00017592892,0.00005614163,0.0000931133,0.0005749015,0.0056442074,0.00039754115,0.98912674,0.003170126,0.000036644447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037796285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030394257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08939313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004343986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031251768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4727617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114712101","doi":"10.1163/22105700-03031081","title":"How not to Argue from Science to Skepticism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Study of Skepticism","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08472458139384767,"score_gpt":0.3459477251552891,"score_spread":0.2612231437614414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114712101","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004640572,0.011298011,0.009805844,0.93901503,0.0041657505,0.000022877522,0.000038853195,0.00006439399,0.030948743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6250885,0.016657162,0.023544898,0.30978802,0.011154686,0.0004071162,0.00011750727,0.0004975274,0.012744633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91274625,0.055677634,0.003489338,0.0074312785,0.017788235,0.0028672293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71277845,0.22797866,0.01386742,0.011827057,0.02820474,0.00534373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10046143,0.001028326,0.0021255529,0.004563044,0.009038554,0.021959465,0.0052320445,0.023595564,0.0066216625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24631369,0.00097452226,0.0016649876,0.003001355,0.08298626,0.044296015,0.009096188,0.04050846,0.00412562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059201873,0.000035433073,0.00062761747,0.00040585047,0.00009560436,0.00024794787,0.012470242,0.00025202427,0.00012320727,0.9107803,0.06076185,0.014140725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033036536,0.0000063824373,0.00012741669,0.00064382004,0.000016265145,0.00007860507,0.003773326,0.00020885268,0.00012258173,0.9532584,0.041700408,0.000030830255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027417308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019800984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10046143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007992734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008832779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5312972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115206405","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3891","title":"Trudy Govier and Premise Adequacy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.054675651937541724,"score_gpt":0.24272749440630823,"score_spread":0.1880518424687665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115206405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07489486,0.011915894,0.24799491,0.118387364,0.0035270664,0.0002788233,0.00031118307,0.0005973436,0.54209256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9285497,0.001750533,0.04381938,0.007562749,0.0018302676,0.00037022642,0.0001608704,0.00035878492,0.015597479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97354275,0.017300824,0.0011046806,0.0030405528,0.0035980598,0.001413088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564823,0.03216127,0.0015647488,0.002898482,0.0059300815,0.00096315873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016028546,0.00080773607,0.0018065975,0.004294175,0.0079574995,0.010747277,0.0028201821,0.0073494054,0.006604134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05181746,0.0008419417,0.0024079492,0.0020918099,0.027633835,0.011335071,0.0066397884,0.010107009,0.0013335643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036846082,0.000010635978,0.00023419868,0.000055529694,0.000013927949,0.00009174414,0.0015134977,0.00023971323,0.000078140896,0.99347067,0.0020083294,0.0022467158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029802028,0.000015929041,0.00015594,0.00011268329,0.000018164026,0.00007484623,0.00051107357,0.000641946,0.00016389116,0.97923744,0.019021941,0.000016429465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046046106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027117792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016028546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005446637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002417627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121059243","doi":"10.1163/221057011x588037","title":"Pyrrhonian Skepticism Meets Speech-Act Theory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Study of Skepticism","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Mistake; Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Epistemology; Philosophy; Speech act; Key (lock); Linguistics; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08782809139287939,"score_gpt":0.3456985279878681,"score_spread":0.2578704365949887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121059243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123935945,0.003638773,0.17257977,0.107986815,0.0012760825,0.000098736884,0.00015498408,0.00021047422,0.5901183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878405,0.00029346664,0.004303562,0.0023701657,0.00023202483,0.000040506646,0.000018152043,0.000028032775,0.00487369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897608,0.006088447,0.00052508496,0.0013053974,0.0016550478,0.00066527154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807263,0.0138855,0.0013590211,0.002080795,0.0015020916,0.00044633634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011251747,0.0005264083,0.00079566246,0.0011643902,0.0027227923,0.005393874,0.0013106925,0.0053226897,0.0034540223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017881569,0.00034745393,0.0008002838,0.0005376319,0.025691397,0.0079606995,0.0046914867,0.00657669,0.0009218231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020137502,0.000003950867,0.00013501749,0.000023385677,0.0000036332342,0.00012645892,0.0027204016,0.00019309715,0.0000832556,0.99469227,0.0005207591,0.0014777891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013680352,0.000014634316,0.0001630977,0.000048973707,0.000004965457,0.00015621881,0.00066725095,0.0010414415,0.00022279167,0.9845451,0.013109307,0.0000124872295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012694817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067458965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011251747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002942116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018233793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05950564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121580608","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00006.x","title":"Self‐Knowledge Failures and First Person Authority<sup>1</sup>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Externalism; Utterance; Obstacle; Attribution; Self-knowledge; Task (project management); Psychology; Epistemology; Counterfactual thinking; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.3828202229710673,"score_gpt":0.35024837297055045,"score_spread":0.03257185000051688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121580608","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44211078,0.0015603023,0.056473665,0.023965528,0.00027282198,0.00005875623,0.00006982847,0.0002525739,0.4752357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99522495,0.00011817121,0.00085573556,0.00025828966,0.000033126467,0.000014757018,0.000016348898,0.000027129063,0.0034514542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923316,0.003788704,0.00038059364,0.000819743,0.0016982214,0.0009810829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978836,0.01072824,0.0032094899,0.0033826584,0.0027978243,0.001045843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076083248,0.00039888572,0.0005353974,0.0012921965,0.003767369,0.006876642,0.0014460097,0.0035452365,0.005038188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015977876,0.00056028954,0.0005963575,0.0007344826,0.032101404,0.015122011,0.0061586048,0.0063245515,0.0009166796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049088063,0.00002213638,0.0016090132,0.00004217132,0.000010974284,0.0002717609,0.043030232,0.00028566006,0.0003532937,0.9489545,0.00091946736,0.0044516525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004092809,0.000069187096,0.004252386,0.00016361466,0.000026214895,0.00064109766,0.02801124,0.0024854608,0.0021110887,0.93116176,0.030973911,0.000063228195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038637158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016571728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076083248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039203316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018615349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04023713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124662483","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i2.2868","title":"Why Fallacies Appear to be Better Arguments Than They Are","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Heuristics; Appeal; Defeasible estate; Epistemology; Jump; Scheme (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Psychology; Computer science; Positive economics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Economics; Law; Political science; Mathematical optimization; Physics","score_opus":0.06121604731127619,"score_gpt":0.2623205485938987,"score_spread":0.2011045012826225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124662483","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24241759,0.008466164,0.36041036,0.1258648,0.004206429,0.000381191,0.0003459142,0.001468872,0.25643882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92562467,0.0009624747,0.056224104,0.0063474462,0.00047824997,0.00018481415,0.00017039897,0.0006015189,0.009406374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96804464,0.016756492,0.0020622693,0.0028468815,0.008140527,0.002149193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9247356,0.04458953,0.0119872,0.009430048,0.007417548,0.0018400972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021549048,0.0011921921,0.0016101236,0.0054170513,0.0059202216,0.012335839,0.0019581888,0.008434545,0.012820875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10389365,0.0010947791,0.0011204783,0.002936258,0.02050979,0.028174605,0.0074878493,0.008322718,0.00274217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011437294,0.000047533315,0.0017136557,0.0003183043,0.00007698859,0.0004028078,0.006881809,0.00055698305,0.0008007475,0.97088,0.0038097475,0.014397011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041498926,0.000026565443,0.0007925964,0.00017480568,0.00003562244,0.0003109987,0.0032533007,0.0013770803,0.00068691396,0.9666135,0.026654642,0.00003237712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00109274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014037777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021549048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033835066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022600116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113963604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127214494","doi":"10.1111/j.1746-8361.2001.tb00222.x","title":"Ordinary Language, Conventionalism and a priori Knowledge","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"dialectica","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conventionalism; A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Entitlement (fair division); Character (mathematics); Face (sociological concept); Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05884641840765568,"score_gpt":0.3093620255155093,"score_spread":0.2505156071078536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127214494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10947836,0.024848994,0.32564795,0.10359273,0.0010053252,0.00008984629,0.00018673466,0.00020073014,0.43494925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633095,0.0028493244,0.02470394,0.0031255712,0.00069622096,0.00012117386,0.000072381896,0.0000519708,0.005069815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99237543,0.0047651823,0.00029172984,0.00091144757,0.0012913576,0.0003648759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98284817,0.013112104,0.0010121344,0.0015588867,0.0010403475,0.00042840204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010830044,0.00045411137,0.00078450335,0.002793638,0.0029671309,0.0048528,0.0018251905,0.0036627704,0.002865263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013048469,0.00041189714,0.00061804266,0.00174697,0.05531604,0.013615949,0.004103642,0.00476035,0.00050170266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033279803,0.0000026826337,0.000047428854,0.000017014358,0.0000021120022,0.000017130671,0.00063619256,0.00007511376,0.000024229832,0.9979127,0.00020266428,0.0010592496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026338637,0.0000023478294,0.00003317831,0.000014980671,9.3376127e-7,0.000016967133,0.0001628476,0.00013497168,0.00001917088,0.9970515,0.002558079,0.0000023072935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018707489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018441983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010830044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037801922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020440144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057275414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128594499","doi":"10.1007/s11229-013-0377-y","title":"Iffy predictions and proper expectations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of language; Successor cardinal; Philosophy of science; Metaphysics; Epistemology; sort; Philosophy of mind; Speech act; Philosophy; Connection (principal bundle); Process (computing); Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04550433135311171,"score_gpt":0.2389985798613773,"score_spread":0.19349424850826558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128594499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040419538,0.002673057,0.28123885,0.069375694,0.0019160961,0.00015086535,0.0009596478,0.0004648287,0.60280144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95065874,0.00093961577,0.02913088,0.003629141,0.0010678883,0.0002550729,0.0005130138,0.0002849783,0.013520612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98998076,0.005611853,0.0006044028,0.0016004507,0.0015469317,0.00065562554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97483134,0.014749801,0.001637463,0.004885826,0.0033065237,0.0005889967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0102638975,0.0010404211,0.0010586481,0.0025539012,0.0024282096,0.0083863195,0.0027218135,0.004034062,0.030523635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057022877,0.00074548856,0.000850556,0.001289025,0.012450481,0.021150578,0.003782224,0.0047358586,0.0034982304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024329302,0.0000133278245,0.00017627048,0.00004441905,0.000009042032,0.000034534423,0.0004430366,0.000489194,0.000033717224,0.9930339,0.0018172642,0.0038808421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006431947,0.0000026745765,0.00009455309,0.00003576896,0.0000032340288,0.000010180103,0.00023961195,0.0012346843,0.00009698738,0.99546885,0.0028032144,0.0000036946412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015587446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015478993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030523635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036130648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029328982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1021117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134720723","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i1.2236","title":"Revision and Immortality in Philosophical Argumentation: Continuing Thoughts on the Rhetorical Wedge","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Argument map; Immortality; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Philosophy; Fallacy; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12089603935311828,"score_gpt":0.31216809696240516,"score_spread":0.1912720576092869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134720723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09384816,0.03465444,0.19092162,0.3370685,0.0024796894,0.0000843899,0.00006151135,0.00017851625,0.34070316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692348,0.0040394426,0.010823071,0.0060331244,0.002016456,0.00010997393,0.000024109826,0.00011945222,0.0075996695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97019243,0.024345553,0.0005894076,0.00096050865,0.0025746892,0.0013373621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9150765,0.07481225,0.0017099896,0.0036760704,0.00343977,0.0012853458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032826167,0.0006263503,0.0013367516,0.0038883605,0.008423099,0.019388631,0.0026657854,0.0108794905,0.0036612463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045762308,0.00067217567,0.0011466084,0.0029050508,0.079285726,0.048032407,0.011026604,0.013899536,0.00053007127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070719693,0.0000065059885,0.000047049827,0.000024976895,0.00000223041,0.000053312557,0.010357871,0.00011222804,0.00003596241,0.9871022,0.0006092961,0.001641329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007462329,0.00000793391,0.00003733888,0.00008532352,0.0000025679196,0.00004841512,0.0038563123,0.00033567642,0.00006111257,0.97940135,0.016148312,0.000008199213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016965679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013455099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032826167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005261476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003723652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17360348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135187704","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i2.2891","title":"A pragma-dialectical response to objectivist epistemic challenges","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Objectivism; Epistemology; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Presupposition; Medicine","score_opus":0.06646282060450644,"score_gpt":0.28877686783745976,"score_spread":0.22231404723295334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135187704","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019533873,0.0038131364,0.3499095,0.53708094,0.0029425449,0.00016941332,0.000119793054,0.00036611222,0.08606471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8035567,0.0016804794,0.12770157,0.042771123,0.003751341,0.0011983187,0.00010565915,0.00045938283,0.018775366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9188988,0.056722075,0.0029859897,0.0061255996,0.013195973,0.002071571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9209855,0.056471862,0.0035041375,0.008519907,0.008549065,0.0019694539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07299986,0.0014730253,0.0023692956,0.0048022876,0.010434648,0.018531442,0.0064396826,0.022249654,0.006392378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09269166,0.0013339422,0.0023148993,0.0031715143,0.086606435,0.033693206,0.018797742,0.032019913,0.0016396068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008144745,0.000008125581,0.000020447123,0.000021892485,0.0000053157914,0.000030414798,0.0017826018,0.000119364704,0.000062842024,0.9960769,0.0010744443,0.00078951026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013614362,0.0000037093023,0.000012699594,0.000029494455,0.000002052942,0.000025980851,0.00043376436,0.0004295976,0.00009162737,0.9908568,0.008094072,0.0000065098175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010924835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008606357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07299986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011955733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006372951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38606477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135214580","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716599","title":"Contemporary Skepticism and the Cariesian God","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Genius; Psychology","score_opus":0.06418901640702497,"score_gpt":0.2300197583400521,"score_spread":0.1658307419330271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135214580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065622695,0.032224204,0.0055874693,0.19266462,0.00089630904,0.000011595151,0.00005152764,0.00006732005,0.7028743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746534,0.0049303183,0.00078096497,0.0071359198,0.0007147611,0.0000138833175,0.000017670407,0.000039282553,0.011713744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99533325,0.0023587341,0.00012382584,0.0005651417,0.0011575255,0.00046135398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993523,0.0041294307,0.0005741644,0.00057382503,0.0008915803,0.00030792036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005480415,0.00031552624,0.00045633418,0.0018759292,0.008375541,0.008402388,0.00078767905,0.005705066,0.00326599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009467572,0.00034402884,0.0003525784,0.0014160973,0.04738484,0.0077785267,0.0040876037,0.0075952373,0.00059802266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009700639,0.0000050378544,0.00013884682,0.000019473524,0.000002457646,0.00007855873,0.008047404,0.000038295777,0.000028865243,0.98521495,0.004041833,0.002374611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013363994,0.000012917484,0.00043300315,0.00017729854,0.000005149754,0.0002706263,0.005352469,0.00017549987,0.0001419556,0.83577734,0.15762725,0.000013036403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048949146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00409335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008402388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007644474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030835043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055464804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135933060","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i4.4077","title":"Virtue, In Context","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Virtue; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.057326803594014195,"score_gpt":0.2504277423336299,"score_spread":0.1931009387396157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135933060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010090527,0.010622657,0.013389786,0.020670258,0.0010130393,0.000023362523,0.000076590346,0.00007014906,0.9440436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.913407,0.0037068909,0.0062635927,0.0053549646,0.0010708148,0.000089129266,0.0000871904,0.0001063031,0.06991402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734664,0.0016167957,0.0000714485,0.00039519693,0.0003311461,0.00023872357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988397,0.0004537863,0.00009728776,0.0002377735,0.00018415604,0.0001872549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024916916,0.00038668662,0.0005140944,0.0011266115,0.005574261,0.01010916,0.0007619874,0.002618357,0.009913478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037160253,0.00020060841,0.00030962183,0.001126222,0.02082698,0.0063391137,0.0043408093,0.0038040173,0.0013549422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000298955,0.0000018366952,0.000070231385,0.00001023238,0.000001087514,0.000022317989,0.0011280663,0.000026931391,0.000019995416,0.9944563,0.0022139347,0.0020460351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000617775,0.000007772822,0.000260542,0.00009575868,0.000004457724,0.00013531005,0.0017080815,0.00012480476,0.00006748667,0.732473,0.26511088,0.0000055461874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024675427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029355437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01010916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031456503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029955478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033163905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137091212","doi":"10.3102/0013189x13515746","title":"Knowledge and Responsibility","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Researcher","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.1868085660854804,"score_gpt":0.41032925948436905,"score_spread":0.22352069339888864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137091212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010763021,0.010867985,0.050068527,0.07818539,0.0011397814,0.00006788439,0.0001111322,0.00009129305,0.84870493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8602012,0.004396331,0.011247654,0.010688049,0.0015100641,0.00022540586,0.000107343374,0.0001358799,0.11148801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935703,0.0034105966,0.00024209594,0.001173471,0.0011314267,0.0004720583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934069,0.0037056876,0.00038816108,0.0012822058,0.0008035107,0.00041352905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006655933,0.00062496413,0.0008056993,0.0015218243,0.004679825,0.010693384,0.0013136844,0.006559105,0.011563326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012268455,0.00045164803,0.0005877603,0.00090469676,0.045765486,0.011573135,0.0039123846,0.006607438,0.0020917023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027958042,0.000004292212,0.000064389475,0.000008681958,0.0000025162205,0.000011898605,0.000688276,0.00006607485,0.000018368542,0.9962316,0.0014668204,0.0014342731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005194303,0.00000505664,0.00008569984,0.000045719218,0.0000031410987,0.000030403418,0.0004223827,0.0001289942,0.000061106424,0.9679721,0.0312355,0.0000046669684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056710965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035882418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011563326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005168648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064729587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038683176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139794519","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i2.2931","title":"Truth and Argument Evaluation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Falsity; Premise; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Logical truth; Criticism; Focus (optics); Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0797422625294547,"score_gpt":0.2921479428081424,"score_spread":0.21240568027868767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139794519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070382487,0.020441681,0.09966189,0.05477362,0.0019595555,0.00022322839,0.00015832979,0.00024310098,0.8155003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8221781,0.010468398,0.058548275,0.012817902,0.004271163,0.0006203785,0.00035826626,0.0006458819,0.09009155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96462506,0.023401344,0.0015862964,0.0029645034,0.005599697,0.0018230877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741132,0.018711427,0.0011558919,0.0022605162,0.003144885,0.0006141285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02352624,0.0011310445,0.001565516,0.0038175213,0.005461007,0.015668355,0.0027493734,0.007525891,0.022431118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04853089,0.0007026979,0.00158551,0.0022582235,0.03301964,0.022944465,0.0078088287,0.0072939377,0.0031725033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010572839,0.0000064146348,0.00006852261,0.0000645692,0.0000068834083,0.00002753723,0.00062600465,0.0001384088,0.00003216878,0.99064445,0.0022824486,0.006092041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011816692,0.000008326944,0.00005602815,0.00010568687,0.0000053944445,0.000041308784,0.00023831717,0.0002849252,0.000103698265,0.96346915,0.035669703,0.0000056281697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019596198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011147748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02352624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010724356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040143314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12442011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139989865","doi":"10.1007/s10670-012-9422-3","title":"Indexical Reliabilism and the New Evil Demon","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indexicality; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Ontology; Demon; Philosophy of language; Counterfactual conditional; Appeal; Counterfactual thinking; Metaphysics; Law","score_opus":0.04357527472585419,"score_gpt":0.2513776039974619,"score_spread":0.2078023292716077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139989865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03684161,0.008159393,0.07309758,0.039728064,0.00095691456,0.000040701554,0.00013044561,0.00018781389,0.84085757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713442,0.0009858828,0.0069301846,0.0016297915,0.00064951804,0.000075568016,0.00004419136,0.00011031465,0.018230531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99545753,0.0023900867,0.0001980164,0.000600723,0.0009317713,0.0004218347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934521,0.003887163,0.00035407674,0.0013986295,0.00061907514,0.00028904525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006459761,0.00064756244,0.0009594812,0.002756466,0.0046475073,0.009606816,0.0017903671,0.0035152647,0.008622927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010896636,0.00048067485,0.00067747437,0.0010177667,0.057974394,0.013197324,0.006815893,0.00771289,0.0008775904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003948424,0.0000019951217,0.0000136250965,0.0000072577836,0.000001118912,0.00000559095,0.00035596514,0.000046904865,0.00001550539,0.99870574,0.00028440735,0.0005578626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036522176,0.0000020478135,0.0000209371,0.0000133720805,0.0000012774198,0.000013053499,0.00014686951,0.00014791476,0.00003940917,0.99489564,0.0047127577,0.0000031388506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001208864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014267871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009606816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004572575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019031534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03416288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140116216","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.017","title":"The folk conception of knowledge","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Luck; Epistemology; Psychology; Attribution; Counterexample; Class (philosophy); Point (geometry); Descriptive knowledge; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10507118841854861,"score_gpt":0.3031589412682219,"score_spread":0.19808775284967328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140116216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03435945,0.013246885,0.184114,0.05227566,0.0010208614,0.00006345743,0.00039802003,0.00024022696,0.7142814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9503874,0.0024965345,0.022904355,0.0042864853,0.001164952,0.00016817643,0.00019195236,0.00010404578,0.018296111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579144,0.002184351,0.00018781275,0.00078235945,0.0007429059,0.000311122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99508333,0.002663877,0.0003499539,0.0010353096,0.00058158935,0.00028590107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038830396,0.0005802009,0.00092118565,0.0032759975,0.0039356407,0.013291806,0.0019530887,0.0042720176,0.005200916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005484183,0.0005146195,0.00079826004,0.002094493,0.05233036,0.014376814,0.0027675193,0.0056396406,0.0009620118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002768932,0.0000030472027,0.000044462187,0.000016182821,0.0000037960137,0.000007483379,0.000653197,0.00008243804,0.000020801204,0.99796295,0.00037076778,0.00083208585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003468103,0.000002520256,0.00008050714,0.000024038764,0.0000029068062,0.000022628032,0.0002231046,0.00018830986,0.000032099786,0.9930534,0.0063636918,0.0000033716744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037587013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028655953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013291806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059090406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036504986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042873263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140958637","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00093.x","title":"On Pragmatic Encroachment in Epistemology","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":329,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Implicature; Argument (complex analysis); Inference; Subject (documents); Orthodoxy; Philosophy; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Social epistemology; Computer science; Pragmatics; Linguistics; Theology","score_opus":0.28901598514164767,"score_gpt":0.4006608074164328,"score_spread":0.11164482227478512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140958637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029113175,0.0074459324,0.26757815,0.17653294,0.0019324903,0.00020084383,0.00011348662,0.00032546057,0.51675755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9354587,0.0014701391,0.039049752,0.008884928,0.001854197,0.0005731903,0.000054506716,0.0002855101,0.012369127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9370841,0.041477904,0.0021367588,0.0050192224,0.011577939,0.0027040779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92766404,0.055068124,0.0026348885,0.008194827,0.0046266606,0.0018114091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05018266,0.0012834215,0.001967207,0.0042479057,0.011709618,0.015226478,0.0037708643,0.012931838,0.0068328804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05417054,0.0015148838,0.0020270892,0.0022965556,0.11106788,0.034297924,0.01872412,0.017966926,0.0011714626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045979864,0.0000044600033,0.000029793804,0.000016965023,0.0000036300087,0.000022027061,0.0011894694,0.00007233645,0.000024085823,0.9976265,0.00027762548,0.00072853477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011038351,0.0000043233154,0.000022938357,0.000026827503,0.0000025293448,0.000019823607,0.00024292503,0.00027477863,0.00003880156,0.99415034,0.005200154,0.0000055528453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002830836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022387463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05018266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010095699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063483836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26539445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142934754","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqu033","title":"Counter Closure and Knowledge Despite Falsehood","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Prima facie; Epistemology; Denial; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Political science","score_opus":0.045700079642187946,"score_gpt":0.2577492157369722,"score_spread":0.21204913609478424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142934754","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18405955,0.0070434534,0.42908388,0.06107873,0.0022067802,0.00018232547,0.00035360866,0.00065354444,0.31533813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741805,0.00074227556,0.019022264,0.0017390068,0.00043410357,0.000093541734,0.00009619093,0.00008921049,0.0036029057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98241526,0.0077659898,0.0012000444,0.0036171859,0.0037040843,0.001297529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93360674,0.045949146,0.0041881725,0.010475441,0.004553482,0.0012270442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017724533,0.00065175624,0.0013835786,0.0029251822,0.0046907105,0.008667914,0.0021718617,0.0056019104,0.004736839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06832392,0.0007578011,0.0016479212,0.0013844597,0.045733437,0.028710252,0.009533529,0.0074836756,0.0006248287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003527107,0.000009404458,0.00029858688,0.000062991465,0.000010522765,0.0002459029,0.0021550034,0.00018872666,0.00015344303,0.99242216,0.0005772018,0.0038407915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013554384,0.00001128195,0.000110422705,0.000058453257,0.000010986457,0.00023147833,0.00039642386,0.00057043997,0.00044938232,0.99118793,0.006948749,0.000010957577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010684421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004944767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017724533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032196122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002549434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093737364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143510213","doi":"10.1111/theo.12005","title":"That's Outrageous","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Outrage; Presentism; Philosophy; Compatibilism; Epistemology; Political science; Determinism; Law","score_opus":0.06095525434760405,"score_gpt":0.23948096913494446,"score_spread":0.17852571478734042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143510213","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025242423,0.0053202263,0.0059191957,0.83522624,0.02963911,0.000019013845,0.000105496016,0.0003238949,0.12092263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19857803,0.006477535,0.005269416,0.5900471,0.012886263,0.00009562623,0.00016954512,0.0010786789,0.18539779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930902,0.0030179152,0.00019217195,0.0010419998,0.0017382975,0.00091953395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99005777,0.0031030313,0.00048016137,0.0019512409,0.0032854092,0.0011224473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009442037,0.00082540425,0.0007880842,0.0010483544,0.007828127,0.0090740025,0.0016190067,0.007817964,0.027714387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021103295,0.00034055416,0.0008480561,0.0005701676,0.02163051,0.017522326,0.0057771946,0.020204684,0.010676192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042748878,0.000040691484,0.0003325226,0.000105587365,0.000023236067,0.00017015904,0.0052362415,0.00008272234,0.0002970945,0.5027768,0.4751704,0.015721794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011238806,0.000017749715,0.00017038548,0.00028519888,0.000011209711,0.00018712059,0.0055260574,0.00011312493,0.00025208466,0.14296323,0.8504352,0.000027429649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006313491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066359844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027714387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035574788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038777257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09271389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144144446","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i3.2175","title":"Three Potential Problems for Powers' One-Fallacy Theory","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Counterexample; Ambiguity; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Inference; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Linguistics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.07424296417331332,"score_gpt":0.2579567446520901,"score_spread":0.1837137804787768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144144446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028139867,0.005626712,0.2553006,0.31573543,0.0026436874,0.00032493434,0.00018977244,0.00054529565,0.39149368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.840466,0.0032864597,0.09310059,0.0283942,0.0037461207,0.0012241624,0.00012849252,0.00040165192,0.029252253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97039187,0.015080461,0.0015460072,0.0030443054,0.008265062,0.0016721714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94100976,0.04464964,0.002638592,0.0057401326,0.0044205757,0.0015413141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027105933,0.0012488972,0.0018323638,0.004251877,0.008713745,0.010964494,0.0043857167,0.011874665,0.01051845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07400986,0.00095356756,0.0019406066,0.0025819635,0.062238496,0.02543323,0.010916785,0.017945256,0.0020297214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070591386,0.0000065850063,0.000057090016,0.00001571487,0.0000027198876,0.000043799828,0.00041008883,0.0000761393,0.000009062816,0.99632794,0.0012952819,0.0017485498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081282315,0.0000031751301,0.000015124544,0.000021512597,0.0000013468292,0.00003522674,0.0001347856,0.00025469033,0.00003260101,0.9955715,0.0039170044,0.000004778555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002250971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015185232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027105933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005900308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037669651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14335155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144840764","doi":"10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.109","title":"Epistemic Trust and Social Location","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Epistemology; Character (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Order (exchange); Trustworthiness; Social character; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03924211562831722,"score_gpt":0.24320220153468292,"score_spread":0.2039600859063657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144840764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39445308,0.00440004,0.13849688,0.025497206,0.0002855369,0.00010089221,0.00022472907,0.00014516222,0.4363964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761355,0.00017824316,0.0008211009,0.00005736777,0.00001896371,0.000009662725,0.000009824704,0.0000058872693,0.0012854025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941578,0.0036512674,0.0003065359,0.00071496284,0.0006971926,0.0004721235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97517085,0.012970756,0.0052450816,0.0023840086,0.0028233961,0.0014059797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004204683,0.0003087705,0.00055901543,0.0018843665,0.0034898312,0.008810755,0.0008615416,0.0024082104,0.0073497077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026531782,0.00025813017,0.0003255724,0.0016302544,0.014460181,0.009600443,0.007646793,0.0015551767,0.0006843132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052089777,0.00003293574,0.0035699455,0.000094697076,0.00003168514,0.00023239506,0.0075951065,0.0020108712,0.00017954227,0.9749452,0.0006643917,0.010591127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018123188,0.000035126555,0.001649222,0.0001243913,0.000027453316,0.00016951017,0.006228935,0.0033128732,0.00021722715,0.97776574,0.010424999,0.000026473477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003956978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024426326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008810755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036541303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022436802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026512742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145849627","doi":"10.2478/disp-2004-0010","title":"Of counterfeits and delusions: Revisiting Ryle on skepticism and the impossibility of global deceit","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disputatio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Impossibility; Proposition; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Absurdism; Law; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.027751266840540273,"score_gpt":0.2839260045232231,"score_spread":0.25617473768268284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145849627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3453976,0.008641724,0.08822436,0.16822049,0.00076682906,0.00010333471,0.00009256867,0.00012876744,0.3884243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99511564,0.00058617344,0.0013628233,0.0013698689,0.00014024145,0.000019241728,0.0000066409166,0.00001738387,0.001382002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882189,0.007608198,0.00045763934,0.0014263855,0.0015196869,0.000769157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9258993,0.05739195,0.0057510645,0.006313409,0.0038505327,0.00079374155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015147983,0.00062487426,0.0013418378,0.0030718485,0.0034534512,0.0123147955,0.0027212054,0.009841846,0.0061303386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04758193,0.0007073622,0.0006792031,0.0014329534,0.07586243,0.023224557,0.013017739,0.01209357,0.00068786164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034264944,0.000019204655,0.00044168226,0.000055378314,0.000012729556,0.00046128576,0.016869063,0.00029196785,0.000103407045,0.9778282,0.00071043486,0.0031724137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020793661,0.000022522669,0.0004434469,0.00019957908,0.000011540385,0.00026599926,0.009056252,0.0014241508,0.00024816947,0.9806551,0.007623449,0.000029009481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001228284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009279785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015147983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035280858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015674506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080111146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148252766","doi":"10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.80","title":"Objectivity and Perspective in Empirical Knowledge","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; San Francisco State University","keywords":"Warrant; Precondition; Objectivity (philosophy); Legitimacy; Rationality; Epistemology; Perception; Perspective (graphical); Positive economics; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06977953594066864,"score_gpt":0.3231146883300579,"score_spread":0.25333515238938925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148252766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09081805,0.022261495,0.3962202,0.08013481,0.00079317455,0.00020042271,0.00036916308,0.00031295719,0.40888968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558039,0.0047748433,0.031914625,0.0018298757,0.0008573053,0.0002727707,0.0001246118,0.000097706834,0.0043243486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97595686,0.016713014,0.0011254654,0.0023002843,0.0031226547,0.00078164256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95402163,0.037641916,0.001873737,0.0043304046,0.0015029153,0.0006293423],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029471178,0.00068500446,0.0012968576,0.004563308,0.0045322166,0.013071432,0.0017784601,0.004027624,0.0034581856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03282516,0.0009430031,0.0012048573,0.0029922428,0.09128896,0.0209496,0.0074235434,0.0062433532,0.0003796492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033881624,0.0000035791932,0.00008701323,0.000025632587,0.0000045611196,0.000022272421,0.0013025225,0.00013501843,0.000030170355,0.99727976,0.00010478416,0.0010013151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005650142,0.000002492906,0.00005189861,0.00003098789,0.000002388035,0.000013167692,0.0002496325,0.00015212897,0.000030995103,0.9971945,0.002263495,0.000002603713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019131108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010057727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062442143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035606578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1558603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148809725","doi":"10.1162/106361403322286689","title":"The Contexts of Philosophy of Science","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Citation; Search engine optimization; Download; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Search engine","score_opus":0.06425133029479069,"score_gpt":0.3141780603158631,"score_spread":0.2499267300210724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148809725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006983401,0.06476147,0.003468371,0.1386518,0.002538647,0.000029479055,0.0002676092,0.00010708427,0.78319216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4725626,0.055260714,0.0031060288,0.014459665,0.0015292515,0.00013281635,0.00035495617,0.00021137447,0.45238256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772006,0.0011453214,0.00005849651,0.00030624797,0.00056273985,0.00020719145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987386,0.00044974827,0.00009804481,0.00017357747,0.0003026555,0.00023747707],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002272201,0.00046923943,0.00045468006,0.0007535873,0.0058031976,0.013473973,0.00066362147,0.0028380745,0.021689678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004123044,0.00039611704,0.00036117164,0.001499817,0.014951594,0.004854194,0.0035504657,0.0050258785,0.0031277747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020082753,0.0000075855687,0.00028395496,0.00009461669,0.000005949134,0.00006745024,0.007531011,0.00009198154,0.00011312228,0.8778198,0.09816794,0.015796596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006254276,0.000005329822,0.00048708258,0.0003838362,0.0000035535163,0.000050982937,0.0034764225,0.00006311814,0.000061486375,0.13927211,0.8561846,0.0000052037913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05034984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07126236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022835918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014892654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16568696},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2150056758","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2012.00082.x","title":"The Ought-Is Gap: Trouble For Hybrid Semantics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Expressivism; Epistemology; Normative; Semantics (computer science); Ontology; Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.11911483433510818,"score_gpt":0.30034796166571776,"score_spread":0.1812331273306096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150056758","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09341479,0.0022044505,0.5848167,0.041349053,0.0007480567,0.000103697246,0.00025226927,0.0008313053,0.27627966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578418,0.00032362936,0.033689335,0.0017451147,0.0002229388,0.00014271526,0.0000894332,0.00026192388,0.0056832647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994718,0.002656368,0.00033289922,0.00082341896,0.0011246413,0.00034477454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897995,0.00594364,0.00042033286,0.0024636292,0.0009134487,0.00045949087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00981073,0.0005058041,0.001224456,0.0018422445,0.0040373662,0.0074866517,0.0018191056,0.0033274954,0.006446279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013287929,0.00060445874,0.0014266995,0.0010165573,0.024658628,0.023429304,0.0068189125,0.006152117,0.0007685346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007103504,0.0000032495425,0.000050621733,0.000010470471,0.0000029117268,0.000014824215,0.0006663576,0.00004957236,0.00005144304,0.99765575,0.00022150045,0.0012661663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040323735,0.0000039352312,0.00003360425,0.000010741281,0.0000028848817,0.000031525735,0.00040426006,0.0004031745,0.00008055945,0.9964174,0.0026041951,0.0000036739555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011114246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010064868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00981073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024200997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017302213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05188471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150078957","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1043","title":"Treacherous Ascents: On Seeking Common Ground for Conflict Resolution","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generality; Common ground; Resolution (logic); Computer science; Conflict resolution; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13516825870943205,"score_gpt":0.3132166242604163,"score_spread":0.17804836555098424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150078957","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12057348,0.0021200583,0.52888817,0.11621931,0.00063786685,0.00041703784,0.00008429061,0.000630839,0.23042902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9196205,0.0006383522,0.067417674,0.0028534953,0.00024432447,0.00019354143,0.00008103185,0.00018472185,0.008766401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9712452,0.02082028,0.0009148901,0.0022859226,0.0029758287,0.0017578717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9508256,0.03089749,0.0038240035,0.007332951,0.004185689,0.0029343609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034309354,0.0008328394,0.0009823855,0.0031986937,0.008874257,0.014225427,0.0040933364,0.007537999,0.008594281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08753565,0.0006760081,0.0013847814,0.0021310821,0.056689285,0.02809905,0.01782191,0.009331028,0.0017048458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008660334,0.00004371404,0.0007650798,0.00004870662,0.000016737857,0.00022410133,0.015133349,0.0016403189,0.00023143367,0.9580653,0.0036241356,0.020120542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000186597,0.000013251258,0.00014274502,0.00006466113,0.0000060776506,0.000044633776,0.0035503916,0.0030961852,0.00020913535,0.9823418,0.010498201,0.000014151513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029289634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032371308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034309354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054028756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065235407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18144739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150102685","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3896","title":"Govier on Trust","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Social trust; Politics; Express trust; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Blind trust; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Law; Social science; Philosophy; Social capital","score_opus":0.07036793476111594,"score_gpt":0.25225399418691247,"score_spread":0.18188605942579653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150102685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015255034,0.013758133,0.061240822,0.18408939,0.0017578097,0.000074012045,0.00016297869,0.00014321253,0.7235186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87689435,0.0071501043,0.009230272,0.023744715,0.0017645329,0.0002134118,0.000084489475,0.00023129076,0.08068688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98970276,0.006059218,0.00033084195,0.0012876673,0.0015226845,0.0010967841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878535,0.008309073,0.00069829053,0.0012620988,0.0013684041,0.00050857244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007609822,0.0006684612,0.0008420512,0.0017745711,0.0075211553,0.010268679,0.0011792284,0.008608045,0.008621316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022558123,0.0003905039,0.0008971192,0.0017246463,0.028970568,0.012114124,0.0053701457,0.008461351,0.0016181892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003804097,9.88248e-7,0.000032992546,0.0000076071024,0.0000011302969,0.000021591299,0.0003884791,0.000055431512,0.000005428241,0.997209,0.0015318332,0.0007416696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008500113,0.0000068372856,0.000056871275,0.00010363388,0.000004637621,0.000056224737,0.0003280603,0.00020565114,0.000043948014,0.94294876,0.056229863,0.0000070088386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014370524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064809485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014370524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009943824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004942753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072147846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151491297","doi":"","title":"From tracking relations to propositional attitudes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ascription; Propositional formula; Relation (database); Social psychology; Epistemology; Psychology; Propositional variable; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.025848263779187326,"score_gpt":0.21418427507962845,"score_spread":0.18833601130044111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151491297","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25784838,0.0016705119,0.5312503,0.008942599,0.0005730492,0.00012290705,0.0015196105,0.0015748892,0.1964978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9065433,0.0008759861,0.080035776,0.0010478208,0.00019616433,0.00009887373,0.0008684462,0.0005497857,0.009783815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963012,0.0011668436,0.00019336429,0.0014356226,0.0006657845,0.00023715588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768127,0.011470108,0.0022072543,0.0066094194,0.0023144912,0.0005860428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038575816,0.0006055232,0.00046696357,0.0022932617,0.0023816593,0.009745032,0.0011405281,0.0018490094,0.011471084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041300517,0.0010706374,0.0010143274,0.0020944471,0.005562284,0.022441713,0.006717448,0.004469861,0.0015823774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015348526,0.0000465407,0.013692119,0.00014178587,0.000053714786,0.00028018293,0.017514074,0.0019896377,0.0032769,0.8928929,0.0024506361,0.06750809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018736695,0.00004678493,0.0066921418,0.00019406634,0.000046213947,0.00027731596,0.0028424503,0.00852214,0.0031183725,0.9492151,0.028977998,0.00004871158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007806716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004453005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011471084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027477057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001297649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038374603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151840772","doi":"10.1017/epi.2011.3","title":"PRAGMATIC ENCROACHMENT: IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT KNOWLEDGE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Position (finance); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.11624474444326378,"score_gpt":0.32281953424766463,"score_spread":0.20657478980440086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151840772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07669262,0.0041401796,0.2798372,0.121347524,0.0009615089,0.00016965265,0.00010789683,0.0004572499,0.51628613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97446024,0.00054014986,0.01385787,0.0041142767,0.0004659466,0.00013150513,0.00003034392,0.00016708617,0.0062325634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9638644,0.019108767,0.0019159177,0.003914467,0.009413922,0.001782644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9515658,0.028526193,0.0034730644,0.010096376,0.005039575,0.0012990444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027126376,0.00076675555,0.0014025157,0.0023625854,0.0071051694,0.014335002,0.002077401,0.008130763,0.006173616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039419726,0.0010503404,0.0011581013,0.001927751,0.10425121,0.039875206,0.013605476,0.01413734,0.0009091118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009107965,0.000007781775,0.00011538405,0.000027681901,0.000008653647,0.00006622051,0.00295189,0.000102654165,0.000191449,0.9942082,0.00041414276,0.001896695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008883472,0.000008511256,0.0001560089,0.00005620559,0.000007895436,0.00009074042,0.0007081691,0.00034678864,0.00025276854,0.9870112,0.011338963,0.000013962128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029876216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020914436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027126376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00610677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050791334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14345968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152897019","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.016","title":"Authentic Gettier cases: A reply to Starmans and Friedman","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Attribution; Argument (complex analysis); Presentation (obstetrics); Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05863602659064587,"score_gpt":0.26524457849697397,"score_spread":0.2066085519063281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152897019","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010099657,0.0024095727,0.0032122442,0.92824835,0.0019951204,0.000019803956,0.00004049817,0.00003326847,0.0539415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59674764,0.0024650805,0.0038757664,0.3626561,0.0062821647,0.0001290426,0.000053599182,0.00017015326,0.027620418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908608,0.0050453236,0.00037957134,0.0011161293,0.0016225909,0.00097560807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735477,0.021138672,0.00100184,0.0014786015,0.00195609,0.00087710156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013275924,0.00054011354,0.0011285836,0.0011970367,0.010466543,0.008492267,0.00256945,0.035436008,0.009070534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049689427,0.00044973235,0.00088950223,0.0013992464,0.027877336,0.022465933,0.0078148795,0.024650263,0.001443861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033948043,0.000017928338,0.0001712916,0.000040338567,0.000010236949,0.00028203503,0.011017513,0.0000715754,0.000042699983,0.8997351,0.085002385,0.0035749685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055003467,0.000010545478,0.00027695845,0.00018760172,0.000014239023,0.0004002532,0.014824285,0.00030708854,0.0002847343,0.76830673,0.21529114,0.00004147526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053569963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008234006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035436008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004011398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003577546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070210636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154108805","doi":"10.1515/krt-2005-011904","title":"A Neo-Hintikkan Theory of Attitude Ascriptions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Ascription; Virtue; Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Perception; Causal theory of reference; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08428689025647347,"score_gpt":0.2828760510128702,"score_spread":0.19858916075639677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154108805","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1098094,0.0015719469,0.46318257,0.018164303,0.00038889644,0.00011025186,0.00023618915,0.00028240442,0.40625402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96894985,0.00022528603,0.022492293,0.0006360017,0.00013930551,0.000077649376,0.000051907682,0.00003832232,0.0073892935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961294,0.0022255164,0.00014386482,0.00036693751,0.000896695,0.00023755974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99561214,0.0021129511,0.0004128216,0.00063261564,0.0010419709,0.0001875706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037599532,0.0004023017,0.0004638775,0.0017130434,0.0019005239,0.004327888,0.0015184444,0.002271135,0.0043483814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056561795,0.00043478195,0.0009508808,0.0011035459,0.012860218,0.009940783,0.0025076354,0.0034854922,0.0007569034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041405137,0.0000043465398,0.000042680815,0.0000086348155,0.000002255901,0.000023079025,0.00061983214,0.00026083953,0.000058710306,0.9980354,0.0001576027,0.0007824783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006715753,0.0000061686837,0.00006983828,0.000013205066,0.0000032644273,0.000028145538,0.00023422393,0.0031355321,0.00007082971,0.99442434,0.002002952,0.000004797606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019164371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013046527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043483814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034663244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010798527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02515006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154127350","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i3.4295","title":"Inference, Circularity, and Begging the Question","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Begging; Inference; Semantic reasoner; Epistemology; Statement (logic); Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1490930985878663,"score_gpt":0.3231040273235812,"score_spread":0.1740109287357149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154127350","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053754594,0.004552994,0.66873264,0.061321214,0.0012870693,0.00022026195,0.00021261923,0.0004010576,0.20951751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8784167,0.0013657005,0.102579795,0.005628241,0.0009944878,0.00037302132,0.00017512083,0.00029849762,0.01016839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98604935,0.008368339,0.0010258527,0.0018608763,0.0018697343,0.0008259152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9618814,0.027188428,0.0022433545,0.005756537,0.0024177886,0.00051251595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020311909,0.00066211284,0.00095886673,0.0025131055,0.004458684,0.00853279,0.0027988527,0.0059116436,0.0064799385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040015966,0.00084906473,0.0016216116,0.0018804157,0.041221566,0.024424715,0.0077794055,0.0074070375,0.001169855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059681006,0.000003881688,0.000077544886,0.000023409619,0.000003848958,0.000036637928,0.0009503269,0.00010599777,0.000048455044,0.9972301,0.000322592,0.0011912361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005254945,0.000004018078,0.00003856978,0.00005754421,0.0000067381457,0.00004511853,0.0003493466,0.0005917582,0.00023182775,0.99017674,0.008485624,0.0000074953405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001647325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009974536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020311909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038232957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031822354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10742092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154311707","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i2.3886","title":"Throwing the Baby Out with the Water: From Reasonably Scrutinizing Authorities to Rampant Scepticism About Expertise","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Expert opinion; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.06019313579507564,"score_gpt":0.2553742799430113,"score_spread":0.1951811441479357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154311707","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121123575,0.0118551385,0.110029325,0.5417331,0.0017846001,0.00012172822,0.00007855482,0.00019127101,0.21308275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96716726,0.0016483224,0.008133132,0.019995186,0.0009074995,0.00006711393,0.000023901606,0.00008178173,0.0019758358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94872355,0.0328034,0.002302435,0.0041707675,0.0101244515,0.0018754546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75214213,0.20921801,0.010642143,0.014007248,0.011445272,0.0025452257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056814708,0.0005405059,0.0011834708,0.004193591,0.006236431,0.015357026,0.0032827614,0.016485237,0.004752531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16546303,0.00062050094,0.0010426596,0.0023592308,0.091803946,0.027410131,0.010771598,0.016946573,0.0009291955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041667885,0.000014287524,0.00076305645,0.0001278955,0.000031692878,0.00025106888,0.015056729,0.00024584113,0.00015512251,0.97156197,0.0038307828,0.0079198275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031187243,0.000018949097,0.00053245894,0.0005880038,0.000021887934,0.00010622705,0.0057996125,0.0006897904,0.00038584849,0.9753924,0.0164019,0.00003170654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028315063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017850116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056814708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006409683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047502625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3004685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154612823","doi":"10.1007/s11229-008-9362-2","title":"On the general argument against internalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of mind; Chemistry","score_opus":0.08977492457558882,"score_gpt":0.264598720397324,"score_spread":0.17482379582173518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154612823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023175897,0.01102801,0.08999002,0.34357852,0.004166818,0.000100707985,0.00060751545,0.00031625485,0.52703625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.859034,0.0055234837,0.032842286,0.056904696,0.008175848,0.0005209268,0.00051025563,0.0006222441,0.035866253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99244374,0.00415416,0.00025785365,0.0012485894,0.0014228026,0.00047274868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97956777,0.014461527,0.0010096827,0.0028749702,0.0016562686,0.00042973002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012846979,0.0008518647,0.0013188934,0.00327958,0.0036417318,0.009645693,0.003123619,0.00705247,0.016813513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028310262,0.0005611842,0.0011602561,0.0022065195,0.038078915,0.016704962,0.0049775937,0.011656509,0.0037090972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009998825,0.0000058924356,0.000048895658,0.000030319787,0.0000055341216,0.000010946708,0.00054996007,0.00007027511,0.0000262191,0.9952624,0.002713025,0.0012665025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018497627,0.000004053802,0.00010292668,0.00012015815,0.000008070002,0.000024605275,0.00045200472,0.00023694967,0.00010916583,0.9825775,0.016340012,0.0000059500776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001615239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013945709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016813513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004055842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026278333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06794214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W215540139","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511806544.009","title":"SAMPLING","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Sampling (signal processing); Computer vision","score_opus":0.14448924539020866,"score_gpt":0.2538052668815421,"score_spread":0.10931602149133343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W215540139","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056271963,0.0056999433,0.27376112,0.0055292235,0.0069018537,0.34650502,0.036578096,0.0024326716,0.2663202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1387418,0.0060655307,0.26626125,0.015139511,0.0024728775,0.31870303,0.028541043,0.0011140218,0.2229609],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9629664,0.019000297,0.0032932374,0.0040713125,0.008704402,0.0019644462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9665968,0.0068266415,0.001541848,0.009699597,0.013148265,0.0021869608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031179791,0.0013416851,0.0014698452,0.005980517,0.0027025137,0.0023120497,0.004773113,0.0020756559,0.09216495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06940475,0.0010416002,0.0008196348,0.0049947286,0.0016146646,0.0019610464,0.0047837505,0.002442995,0.048097905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030033994,0.0013918277,0.018691575,0.002708056,0.00011974278,0.0022531105,0.017603837,0.0017675558,0.006840381,0.073326066,0.36709452,0.5051999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075986417,0.0009531341,0.013053586,0.0012524697,0.000079901874,0.0009488624,0.005422775,0.0033846542,0.0033920074,0.026444286,0.9442043,0.00010418029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009680415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011006789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09216495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033738937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059097465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157689524","doi":"10.1111/phil.12032","title":"The Epistemic Argument for Mental Causation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Forum","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Argument (complex analysis); Citation; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Library science; Medicine","score_opus":0.05995215967090298,"score_gpt":0.2804983357918484,"score_spread":0.22054617612094543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157689524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033617303,0.007632862,0.18694824,0.27547568,0.0020764144,0.00007402737,0.00038244028,0.00016702194,0.49362606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96040857,0.001525127,0.015596098,0.0072308243,0.0018993786,0.00018759785,0.00009953256,0.000079897065,0.01297288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99077904,0.0057346583,0.00034031662,0.0012135057,0.0013511567,0.00058132206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97559154,0.019333674,0.000991236,0.0021621962,0.0013324729,0.0005889053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011464321,0.0006283308,0.0010518613,0.0026596969,0.0055749505,0.008448974,0.0020906297,0.00997873,0.010922188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03139185,0.00074950926,0.0013683464,0.0014095884,0.037066445,0.01722895,0.005482674,0.00968919,0.0012217643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032022374,0.0000026785056,0.000026601323,0.000008437874,0.0000019588033,0.000013833528,0.00016200395,0.000048782655,0.000009607405,0.9989213,0.0004278224,0.00037389854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005589318,9.892129e-7,0.000025977564,0.000012078904,0.0000019249742,0.000014771294,0.00007258742,0.00017908595,0.000018900902,0.9973151,0.002350773,0.0000022466586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021767488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012673772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011464321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037136711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033744148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060629904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157873197","doi":"10.2478/disp-2004-0009","title":"Reasons, contents and experiences","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disputatio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Perception; Analytic philosophy; Psychology; Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.059146966853287235,"score_gpt":0.27766258996119003,"score_spread":0.2185156231079028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157873197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1037426,0.0060506873,0.09147303,0.05115675,0.00087150914,0.00012471863,0.0003193031,0.00020447426,0.746057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98111516,0.0008501356,0.006298778,0.0012401255,0.00018568533,0.000049397724,0.00007979405,0.000051034847,0.010129799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952467,0.0030175096,0.00020956984,0.00042452084,0.00074601144,0.00035569942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289787,0.004364034,0.00050405256,0.0010333658,0.00083340536,0.00036716007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004694543,0.00035173373,0.00034209475,0.0015726426,0.0021613447,0.008650208,0.0010824719,0.0031356553,0.009307361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012900844,0.0003605132,0.00041621766,0.00093410426,0.028070807,0.011024904,0.0036107532,0.0030499133,0.0007082154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000094762745,0.000007149957,0.0002853925,0.000037748396,0.000004706588,0.00007116533,0.0048503075,0.0000826401,0.0001289326,0.99100924,0.0007261449,0.002787152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013669282,0.000016763965,0.00066689006,0.00013597544,0.000009223256,0.00013189981,0.008214102,0.0002804681,0.00032540268,0.93812746,0.052064445,0.000013834554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001038864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083459466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009307361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002112767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015557025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031136215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161719373","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300003115","title":"Idealism, Scepticism, and Internal Relations: Remarks on Hymers's<i>Philosophy and Its Epistemic Neuroses</i>","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Skepticism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.041824757905313426,"score_gpt":0.25028534020856424,"score_spread":0.20846058230325082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161719373","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040904645,0.010440192,0.06370715,0.5178537,0.0020789753,0.00008550462,0.00015457378,0.00022371957,0.36455148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9414641,0.0027672194,0.012947618,0.025303168,0.001959878,0.00021919145,0.00004179877,0.00017464304,0.015122424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894093,0.0072691278,0.0003831597,0.0010037343,0.0013440745,0.0005905314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97987515,0.01539892,0.0010753362,0.001440689,0.0015218261,0.000688161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017441709,0.00057734095,0.0009794851,0.0031489534,0.008368597,0.010502368,0.0026421153,0.009319526,0.0049186395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01964231,0.0005968317,0.0011300871,0.0022396913,0.10427108,0.01792049,0.0074807685,0.013527783,0.00087120547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056391686,0.0000028038723,0.000029372384,0.000011123732,0.0000017030578,0.00002700667,0.0042464444,0.00004087374,0.000013960033,0.9925754,0.0023451878,0.0007004917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008981996,0.0000033674198,0.00006406388,0.00005088453,0.0000027734982,0.000041573065,0.0021554602,0.00021925871,0.00006622293,0.98943466,0.007944251,0.000008581787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006229783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042616935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017441709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007540347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004588287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092241645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161834173","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.013","title":"Slurring and common knowledge of ordinary language","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Utterance; Contempt; Linguistics; Sentence; Contradiction; Psychology; Meaning (existential); Competence (human resources); Emotive; Philosophy; Epistemology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03050663867209077,"score_gpt":0.2922494981573361,"score_spread":0.26174285948524534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161834173","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33946717,0.0030025176,0.38417077,0.023639677,0.00044480443,0.00014556694,0.00041068302,0.00041797588,0.24830079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824766,0.00024397779,0.014364809,0.00038812842,0.00014785699,0.000052598905,0.00009979291,0.00005314903,0.0021731479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98345816,0.008147475,0.0018502858,0.0028208483,0.0025224518,0.0012008447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9349055,0.042526044,0.002292555,0.014939645,0.0043282346,0.00100808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01455895,0.00043020406,0.00174914,0.0036919569,0.004483589,0.011027853,0.002538462,0.0039817896,0.005437075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055379905,0.00094479416,0.0013739621,0.0027058881,0.045614332,0.031725876,0.0093777785,0.0048880256,0.00046479993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025106998,0.000011814732,0.0003283434,0.00003711749,0.000011535124,0.00009858196,0.0083093215,0.00029927955,0.00017142638,0.98617804,0.00030793188,0.004221422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007812157,0.000004802046,0.00012141463,0.00001809655,0.000007724354,0.00005217289,0.0012350018,0.00058804627,0.000114598195,0.99580234,0.0020372847,0.000010633291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004816189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002776327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01455895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028110165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003803365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07699603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161873852","doi":"10.7202/011070ar","title":"L’interprétationnisme radical","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.25934951122825617,"score_gpt":0.3669458424763485,"score_spread":0.10759633124809231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161873852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01839909,0.0074398057,0.04745635,0.07252175,0.00524795,0.000061627085,0.00017900098,0.00011606191,0.8485784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81865543,0.004644314,0.014884635,0.01927704,0.0024688784,0.00023800915,0.00017061882,0.00034858758,0.13931264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953113,0.0023222638,0.00013537856,0.00084573973,0.0009358465,0.00044955575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971975,0.0013221211,0.0002035998,0.00048329943,0.00062788796,0.00016555295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003158519,0.0006263314,0.0005191992,0.0010057564,0.004513862,0.0057631717,0.0012935189,0.0025247037,0.010602724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048960526,0.0003739029,0.00074925466,0.00068833085,0.019281233,0.0060247523,0.00522938,0.008339961,0.0021242383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015173099,0.0000056479807,0.00010691804,0.00003934511,0.000004851589,0.000035486948,0.0047773477,0.00003914099,0.00016857906,0.98568106,0.004986715,0.0041396734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002070746,0.000030039173,0.00045382138,0.00012902259,0.000018214241,0.00015509725,0.004814025,0.00025151877,0.00054655346,0.5702936,0.4232595,0.000027883143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051447167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059753065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010602724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004701234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037068531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03546959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163687581","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/8g2av","title":"Manifest Failure: The Gettier Problem Solved","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Section (typography); Key (lock); Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law and economics; Economics; Computer security","score_opus":0.08326859743021658,"score_gpt":0.23392681129655415,"score_spread":0.15065821386633757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163687581","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032694332,0.0046034115,0.45279604,0.2206014,0.005654684,0.00021410761,0.0003208111,0.0014235078,0.28169176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8632174,0.0021288816,0.053173125,0.03161896,0.0028533617,0.00037339792,0.0002149395,0.0011155659,0.04530418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98670596,0.005257271,0.0008598477,0.002514616,0.0033280256,0.0013342542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97482204,0.0114858635,0.0014090259,0.0075587463,0.0036995478,0.0010247529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022150286,0.0011481757,0.0015619693,0.0016193066,0.0051660105,0.006621274,0.003607336,0.00983415,0.021511488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056900997,0.0008235572,0.0016961391,0.0012008689,0.035149463,0.027288772,0.012186628,0.015021379,0.0033400438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017130324,0.0000065932645,0.0001315893,0.000038706225,0.0000074733284,0.000072020935,0.0006621176,0.0001528636,0.00008225144,0.98900837,0.005103386,0.0047173672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017599375,0.000010625302,0.000051521056,0.000050415194,0.000008121691,0.00010537574,0.00027606456,0.0006520687,0.00016172482,0.9810867,0.017565873,0.00001384634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022003811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014546786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022150286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042655906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004773453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11714333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166139333","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2153","title":"An Epistemological Approach to Argumentation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Epistemology; Interpersonal communication; Simple (philosophy); Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09099506718038776,"score_gpt":0.2969452559415837,"score_spread":0.20595018876119597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166139333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029239124,0.012142529,0.3840885,0.058294084,0.0022406422,0.0002119829,0.00018663197,0.00019473564,0.5397171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5482918,0.012531111,0.32697418,0.012970214,0.0052272454,0.0014942049,0.00034985162,0.00030345327,0.09185791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98005235,0.013473085,0.0011240068,0.0014169378,0.0031578415,0.00077581947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875964,0.0079222275,0.00076176017,0.0014998768,0.0015875666,0.00063225895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013852297,0.0011856519,0.0012251653,0.0049338187,0.007477852,0.0162109,0.0036000009,0.0069168196,0.00877088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01436513,0.000731018,0.0019176789,0.0034767846,0.041070763,0.018023541,0.007203153,0.008490846,0.0020766063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001353229,0.0000037559557,0.000013544032,0.000023300996,0.000002837549,0.0000140834445,0.0003599463,0.00008051261,0.000014686913,0.99766314,0.0006009492,0.0012218965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044877575,0.0000029861883,0.000012286907,0.000048147685,0.0000021441308,0.000025800347,0.00019191895,0.00027031454,0.00002339961,0.97294235,0.026473051,0.000003158408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001953508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016758649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0162109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007681262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064229635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07325882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167832813","doi":"10.1111/cogs.12182","title":"Is Probabilistic Evidence a Source of Knowledge?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Denial; Distrust; Psychology; Perception; Social psychology; Population; Trustworthiness; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Sociology","score_opus":0.14625263471767175,"score_gpt":0.3397310837496137,"score_spread":0.19347844903194195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167832813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50875854,0.009715972,0.28843027,0.0625099,0.0006095534,0.00020060893,0.00033026753,0.00026540426,0.12917948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856631,0.0012865985,0.0106898155,0.001248245,0.00022091251,0.000049155915,0.00009340349,0.000027667113,0.00072112534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97652686,0.012286564,0.0011793767,0.0024857703,0.0068380916,0.0006833332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6350656,0.29690528,0.030395433,0.025180021,0.010351747,0.002101863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02557997,0.00046362024,0.0008574949,0.0032362293,0.001557344,0.0057262057,0.0019002018,0.00397619,0.009534897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23350237,0.0010710908,0.00078475603,0.0022978373,0.011804796,0.026127633,0.004452459,0.0034181434,0.0009475166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013591684,0.00046535296,0.055476483,0.0034983295,0.0010066862,0.0018680585,0.031337697,0.0033144997,0.008019759,0.54519236,0.0038691566,0.34459242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014953678,0.0002619274,0.014073071,0.00082248024,0.0003185585,0.0020136216,0.0053829676,0.005334365,0.0042507634,0.9464091,0.0208624,0.000121226716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062248437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046411174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02557997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011395508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001235359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13528144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168133519","doi":"10.1177/0048393106296572","title":"Unwrinkling the Carpet of Meaning","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Reification (Marxism); Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Relation (database); Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy of language; Extension (predicate logic); Natural (archaeology); Metaphysics; Linguistics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.16461753626215953,"score_gpt":0.3356673704731893,"score_spread":0.17104983421102976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168133519","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008450339,0.1666952,0.031961452,0.498191,0.014628095,0.00003642507,0.00011229754,0.00011566263,0.27980942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65419775,0.095552206,0.014452696,0.11335371,0.033599455,0.00022773696,0.00016637234,0.00063508283,0.0878149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931924,0.0037487024,0.00018391377,0.00083518395,0.0017078364,0.00033198314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923878,0.0052735624,0.00027358558,0.00081440556,0.0010359908,0.0002146419],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056540426,0.0006254474,0.00063790125,0.0024941391,0.0042720484,0.0075775823,0.0012882556,0.004485829,0.0054885666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013756702,0.00031671338,0.00054419175,0.0014846043,0.044009663,0.019917158,0.0038230522,0.00887102,0.0014310129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009491288,0.0000025936852,0.0000405716,0.00006563288,0.000003928127,0.00003682703,0.002052554,0.00008253661,0.00003374917,0.97290593,0.017176116,0.0075901463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044181565,0.000008589416,0.00012240905,0.0002587482,0.0000034358436,0.000077221346,0.0014748778,0.00011473184,0.00006366622,0.7451071,0.25275442,0.000010303733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040212367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034036476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99572796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041489853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037448227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030103147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168458288","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i1.3608","title":"Virtue and Argument: Taking Character Into Account","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.044226886786066295,"score_gpt":0.25235894873701714,"score_spread":0.20813206195095085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168458288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042504273,0.006661957,0.21371344,0.041884784,0.0011172644,0.00012152096,0.00006743887,0.0001876959,0.69374156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575689,0.0010275138,0.02371972,0.0026188886,0.0005865825,0.00017788376,0.00003980192,0.00010742932,0.014153197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886473,0.008357018,0.00034749106,0.00074946234,0.0013241578,0.000574696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873137,0.007788488,0.00096119515,0.0016837611,0.0012786557,0.0009742279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011146899,0.00056153355,0.0010296347,0.0023014457,0.004783149,0.013910323,0.0014428006,0.0070465854,0.006143345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013770092,0.00039628267,0.0009461575,0.0013455426,0.043047808,0.020734007,0.006565017,0.0065878117,0.0010000294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005125968,0.000004589562,0.00011131143,0.000017284989,0.0000029742973,0.000022955694,0.00045971893,0.000066291286,0.000032733926,0.998111,0.00021191982,0.0009540626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007907656,0.000008952502,0.00010789664,0.000036593727,0.000003577705,0.000074314215,0.00036039363,0.00046648923,0.000056135985,0.9868198,0.012052816,0.0000050717613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000544645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000582842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013910323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002531853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023086558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05895114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171784418","doi":"10.1007/s11229-010-9800-9","title":"Two kinds of a priori infallibility","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Infallibility; A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Philosophy of language; Falsity","score_opus":0.0450158265678674,"score_gpt":0.2905311945748012,"score_spread":0.2455153680069338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171784418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038575612,0.0043707048,0.4128366,0.032701723,0.0010567788,0.0003017659,0.00063893833,0.00046600043,0.50905186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87931573,0.0013497351,0.098468296,0.0029560358,0.00083843444,0.00083392777,0.00051295187,0.00036532956,0.015359417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830263,0.008927773,0.0012746411,0.0032077036,0.002653205,0.0009103839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90811926,0.06175269,0.0027794684,0.021150783,0.004430684,0.0017671117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018797582,0.0012254816,0.0016022042,0.005057565,0.0044328896,0.011593104,0.0038694039,0.0082408395,0.027563814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07732719,0.0016943509,0.0016728083,0.0023364716,0.040601008,0.030047372,0.010185428,0.010106416,0.0026726907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014585937,0.000007651356,0.00008280283,0.000050857027,0.0000061718174,0.000016615031,0.00072317995,0.0000762958,0.000045701516,0.9962559,0.0004105847,0.0023097538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009142432,0.00000557839,0.000099263205,0.00007861612,0.0000051650354,0.000032835957,0.00024661236,0.0003682245,0.00014954644,0.9952513,0.0037469438,0.0000067568467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006674058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010095004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027563814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039850553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035420859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09941226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172009470","doi":"10.1017/s0012217310000041","title":"The Limits of Internalism: A Case Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Externalism; Presumption; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.09161990156836854,"score_gpt":0.3120470316840336,"score_spread":0.22042713011566506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172009470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94318986,0.00066221994,0.0073947203,0.009050663,0.00008394336,0.00035699905,0.0000943509,0.000027406062,0.039139777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991097,0.00071470666,0.0034687703,0.0007882757,0.000034870423,0.00023215057,0.000026957983,0.00002720123,0.0036101197],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848534,0.011952777,0.00033467048,0.0005248321,0.0010478724,0.0012864296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.963089,0.03093416,0.0017096052,0.0016346197,0.0010454555,0.001587145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014358231,0.00076658017,0.00091609766,0.0024107264,0.02178169,0.00702946,0.002722567,0.008149883,0.006120866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027236484,0.00074625545,0.0008052288,0.002492461,0.016008306,0.0065425523,0.008939539,0.0080295745,0.00066130783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015125619,0.0011713319,0.012498097,0.00030028002,0.00003136417,0.06335852,0.8342637,0.0004927032,0.00067940634,0.06747177,0.0028457055,0.016735798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080811114,0.00027316707,0.0033218805,0.0005353066,0.00004744311,0.029889511,0.9120027,0.0012336017,0.0013465682,0.01928372,0.031930473,0.00005495824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009548633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015411023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02178169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047861845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002926092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07593453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181526211","doi":"10.29173/irie214","title":"Government Secrecy, the Ethics of Wikileaks, and the Fifth Estate","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Review of Information Ethics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Fourth Estate; Public interest; Political science; Government (linguistics); Journalism; Estate; Public relations; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.07159690985232728,"score_gpt":0.3225260801470421,"score_spread":0.25092917029471484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181526211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20980272,0.008913479,0.020737063,0.07498672,0.00088790705,0.000047446647,0.000059468144,0.00007074689,0.6844945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98408276,0.0012599367,0.0018170865,0.0012360342,0.00015236362,0.000026653357,0.000012978008,0.000023944287,0.011388217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98129845,0.01164705,0.0009902267,0.0008647144,0.003979585,0.0012200644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95580727,0.03018834,0.005291583,0.004906443,0.0023037787,0.0015026211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012874815,0.00027898024,0.00034700293,0.0018532067,0.0058992845,0.020038221,0.00092273863,0.00470529,0.0026089065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032229144,0.0004143718,0.00030027665,0.0016121246,0.042478465,0.015616239,0.00739721,0.004520565,0.000532549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015466672,0.000008149865,0.0006122291,0.000031661213,0.0000029067417,0.00011062923,0.010735159,0.000080541526,0.000057545338,0.9834072,0.0008168876,0.0041215206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002893004,0.00003687491,0.0014793883,0.0007860022,0.00002346784,0.0006654963,0.03194155,0.0006354153,0.0012582004,0.81237745,0.15071578,0.000051323193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031429362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003525405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020038221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003603329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007055118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06808931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182859523","doi":"","title":"A pragma-dialectical default on the question of truth","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Epistemology; Criticism; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05861650614167141,"score_gpt":0.2945879025731903,"score_spread":0.23597139643151888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182859523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018754125,0.0042189937,0.4280869,0.08789279,0.0015354581,0.00018087933,0.00041774017,0.00044653623,0.4584666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85612524,0.0019789005,0.080130875,0.011958718,0.0015625835,0.0005863277,0.00028551547,0.00023703293,0.04713483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988139,0.006827687,0.00064953516,0.0018342232,0.002053541,0.0004961067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98779476,0.0077580074,0.0005245354,0.0021980454,0.001342997,0.00038170608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014304178,0.0006291595,0.00092049694,0.0022088364,0.0043865745,0.0075826007,0.0024031855,0.0072356267,0.011527134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02417532,0.00045722286,0.0010979647,0.0018979876,0.040671088,0.019496929,0.0069540488,0.008840759,0.0030569183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005689994,0.0000021477324,0.000013764711,0.000013905825,0.000001496726,0.000012137358,0.00039857044,0.00007095512,0.000028257959,0.9977329,0.00074949476,0.000970665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006961442,0.0000035064338,0.000020135036,0.000029379118,0.0000017916387,0.000025428224,0.00014761997,0.0002823338,0.00006543403,0.9906731,0.008740725,0.0000035496616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016668919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009919996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014304178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067014857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035177376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075648606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190559544","doi":"10.1080/0092623x.2015.1106763","title":"A Review of \"Tolerance of Uncertainty\"","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.19952226018164654,"score_gpt":0.3817107811412678,"score_spread":0.18218852095962124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190559544","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011736884,0.998831,0.000018462702,0.0007853476,0.00019542211,0.0000018495084,0.0000041927683,7.121037e-7,0.00015118875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00033312966,0.9983804,0.000055845492,0.0008616229,0.00024342554,0.00000717978,0.000007532221,0.0000011080546,0.000109751156],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980286,0.0008412321,0.00032788317,0.0001840616,0.00051428,0.000103918865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931298,0.0051447935,0.00062521995,0.000113371054,0.00081334903,0.000173452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046278746,0.00128788,0.0025067697,0.004317196,0.0007806196,0.0032225272,0.0015763988,0.0020871926,0.0044575753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016299894,0.00086979126,0.0008351249,0.007468582,0.0028512485,0.0054558767,0.0030461936,0.0045220926,0.0011418441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009706866,0.0000461042,0.00021131232,0.06777887,0.00023181332,0.00010788961,0.00076563866,0.00019414944,0.0001408393,0.013214662,0.1941751,0.7230364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002840364,0.000057442743,0.0013773596,0.07255664,0.00016317086,0.0005876157,0.0006441078,0.000047342943,0.00009874742,0.008649055,0.9157449,0.000045278382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00835645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015210068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00835645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028491819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00709308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0244748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2192421421","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i4.4386","title":"Mizrahi and Seidel: Experts in Confusion.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expert opinion; Confusion; Epistemology; Key (lock); Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.16153640127224797,"score_gpt":0.28933537933286396,"score_spread":0.127798978060616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2192421421","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05124502,0.0717567,0.12023871,0.4752932,0.0059020594,0.00009688353,0.00014163955,0.00031378935,0.275012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9188465,0.0069675855,0.01546942,0.03812144,0.0030355637,0.00012073745,0.000039406146,0.00009952423,0.017299837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98269457,0.012133893,0.0007339731,0.0012580479,0.0024270955,0.0007525584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9614531,0.030250324,0.0025265962,0.0016860141,0.0033084557,0.000775605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016067043,0.0005697248,0.0005707662,0.00362672,0.0056558093,0.007628837,0.0013433556,0.0083943615,0.0046510664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05167904,0.00046446224,0.00053476344,0.0022425107,0.030682877,0.017484875,0.0065496755,0.005622222,0.0010175698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003291124,0.0000058806722,0.0005317953,0.00010999001,0.000012095066,0.00018362577,0.02324318,0.00011983472,0.00015218873,0.9470655,0.015611833,0.012931282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025995529,0.000028633263,0.001324202,0.00045894075,0.000032579625,0.0005808771,0.017204635,0.0010150941,0.00082888774,0.81641746,0.1620326,0.00005019192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026860829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036458517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016067043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049784603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029916356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08497167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2194365097","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i4.4330","title":"Virtues, Evidence, and Ad Hominem Arguments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Epistemology; Legitimacy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemic virtue; Appeal; Philosophy; Character (mathematics); Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.19395576315062887,"score_gpt":0.30317661237687565,"score_spread":0.10922084922624678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2194365097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08454268,0.010769207,0.16788977,0.10046121,0.001730245,0.000116961855,0.00016656781,0.00021370157,0.6341097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96265924,0.0010395121,0.022954432,0.0026122085,0.0005658746,0.00009914607,0.000040863837,0.00004807696,0.00998063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866887,0.008839994,0.00063221,0.0010472364,0.0021807386,0.0006111541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9622327,0.029356645,0.0023700849,0.0026447496,0.0023917374,0.0010040457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016179971,0.00042091132,0.00082676834,0.0032070836,0.003976526,0.009273518,0.0015025744,0.005627377,0.007076358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033548634,0.00044791427,0.00070240133,0.0016826238,0.040319286,0.013339124,0.005484409,0.0057022134,0.00077866565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005908771,0.000005743802,0.00010084096,0.00002602752,0.000003452737,0.000034486715,0.00035204957,0.00006218778,0.00003103779,0.9972395,0.0005905076,0.001548324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007653959,0.0000049084756,0.000115282644,0.000051026273,0.0000031128009,0.000039538943,0.00021964814,0.0003383702,0.000077604505,0.9904248,0.008711927,0.000006062175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059977075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007787736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016179971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002880614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021390966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085568845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200912703","doi":"10.1111/meta.12160","title":"Getting off the Wheel","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Attribution; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.17678346117820307,"score_gpt":0.28260890735972716,"score_spread":0.10582544618152409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200912703","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00919766,0.013833365,0.05894206,0.70668083,0.0060166838,0.000039710438,0.00014008446,0.00034223284,0.20480745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7900761,0.013945888,0.029773092,0.07349889,0.007080673,0.0002650827,0.00017480722,0.00083567353,0.08434991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877908,0.0074407,0.0002802582,0.0010053216,0.0028084093,0.00067448633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981045,0.011694081,0.0005529585,0.0027020113,0.0028989522,0.0011069585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017900236,0.00063899107,0.0009780476,0.0035465218,0.0066663953,0.013083154,0.0017442453,0.0063757086,0.011784005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029828662,0.00055326225,0.0006934217,0.0016145018,0.049757283,0.031256087,0.008387601,0.016673442,0.0031276883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076263295,0.000008487696,0.00005700019,0.000027325135,0.0000037096409,0.00001743706,0.0013191986,0.000119067525,0.00002692881,0.9798957,0.014099224,0.004418286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041911653,0.000004574605,0.0000479674,0.00012121,0.000002663541,0.000023169478,0.0010614935,0.0003079815,0.00008116202,0.9353112,0.063027024,0.000007312666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054763444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00415302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017900236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008022427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070375227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09466666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213350869","doi":"","title":"Deception, Disadvantage, and Democratic Deliberation: Aboriginal Strategies and Deliberative Institutions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Disadvantaged; Deception; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Political science; Persuasion; Solidarity; Rhetoric; Sociology; Social psychology; Democracy; Law and economics; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.03390672667657278,"score_gpt":0.3128211535632359,"score_spread":0.2789144268866631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213350869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24547505,0.009331685,0.042992342,0.102296755,0.00024945842,0.00009867208,0.000035027875,0.00006467815,0.5994562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991829,0.00074444717,0.0023709224,0.00076550216,0.00004186559,0.000033160915,0.000005458425,0.000011172759,0.0041984622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98907334,0.008148072,0.0002094455,0.0005587861,0.00097329746,0.0010370871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903003,0.0062079495,0.001421857,0.00090142444,0.00051751366,0.0006509556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011850395,0.00044525551,0.00042377063,0.0015908456,0.008910011,0.008667841,0.0013776342,0.0038932262,0.002574081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011613246,0.00026180712,0.00044319374,0.0012743997,0.058397263,0.0069409315,0.008686093,0.0034389358,0.00030181013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020990623,0.00001801756,0.0010028373,0.00005981657,0.000010866637,0.0001418999,0.055888884,0.00061262684,0.00010112214,0.9361239,0.00055398606,0.0054650162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002131068,0.000030651314,0.0015974523,0.00023157302,0.000016642009,0.00012013998,0.02806739,0.0013609205,0.00032147538,0.93114096,0.037068464,0.000022975939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019033905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01327708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019033905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008289199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00717342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06267166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229666405","doi":"","title":"Trudy Govier , The Philosophy of Argument . Reviewed by","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cégep de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.09986515626382288,"score_gpt":0.25144744209197323,"score_spread":0.15158228582815036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229666405","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011929223,0.95379025,0.0005711209,0.031680703,0.005653566,0.0000046463515,0.00006517502,0.000020330363,0.00809497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010374409,0.942142,0.0010727149,0.013627562,0.016051067,0.0000404705,0.00020461265,0.00008881889,0.016398387],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985258,0.00066847814,0.00009557137,0.0002493044,0.0003907017,0.00007023395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99595875,0.0027389685,0.00018074959,0.00012268024,0.0008079688,0.00019099886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015353938,0.002205645,0.0018164676,0.006106724,0.0031795942,0.0049492465,0.002181458,0.0070039215,0.019146519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060213213,0.001150569,0.0008728706,0.009057493,0.007059536,0.010675063,0.001962444,0.006906239,0.0072870594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045070912,0.00002859864,0.00028412955,0.0024874732,0.000056589302,0.00014723501,0.0011093615,0.00043309297,0.00008239586,0.13156189,0.79740584,0.06635843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026961312,0.0000068970053,0.0008970625,0.0037965856,0.000026653835,0.00023486163,0.0007792119,0.00025280594,0.00006788611,0.105413675,0.8884673,0.0000301452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021352278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034612585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021352278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004316413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034739873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06405151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237172662","doi":"","title":"Trust, in So Many Words","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03685049037616735,"score_gpt":0.24744134971473536,"score_spread":0.21059085933856803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237172662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006039424,0.00705785,0.018746145,0.17346777,0.007109034,0.00009314127,0.00031654414,0.000339526,0.7868306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58705753,0.0077590495,0.003979168,0.066380575,0.0053810063,0.00022371029,0.00036901498,0.00039778397,0.32845205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890997,0.0045409906,0.0007304407,0.0014140242,0.0030167298,0.0011980659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870896,0.0034714844,0.0013134246,0.002964737,0.0033766215,0.0017841369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054677497,0.0006290043,0.00077211385,0.00096259126,0.0067660557,0.012970418,0.0011575768,0.004427855,0.025180083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024334027,0.00032755247,0.0003734747,0.0013599854,0.021107795,0.017471561,0.0067749857,0.0067812037,0.0132113965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023161996,0.000013883667,0.00036314517,0.00009162486,0.000021622796,0.00015702404,0.0080726985,0.00008653046,0.00015320063,0.8426499,0.1294813,0.018885978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007838746,0.000016034683,0.0002584589,0.00020165747,0.000010723166,0.00028770397,0.004189702,0.00010159459,0.00009129785,0.15986001,0.8349512,0.000023711265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008662389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063664084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025180083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044555697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006390976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08423573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253989905","doi":"10.1177/0048393115613570","title":"On the Hidden Thought Experiments of Economic Theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Epistemology; Presentation (obstetrics); Positive economics; Formal description; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24039315092660887,"score_gpt":0.3515014101262487,"score_spread":0.11110825919963982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253989905","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06275772,0.024000684,0.41207814,0.19469742,0.0040426003,0.00048150422,0.0005760059,0.00058395567,0.30078194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9147134,0.00579438,0.05959988,0.009630811,0.0020676728,0.00086140307,0.00011906898,0.00021369333,0.0069996384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95898694,0.03211655,0.00096143683,0.0027011596,0.004226058,0.0010078645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77341104,0.20301913,0.0054795314,0.013121793,0.003657612,0.0013110166],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045418363,0.0011942374,0.0018285286,0.0027746959,0.0035076847,0.008764676,0.00294994,0.0062836586,0.009496593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10197347,0.00080893375,0.0015718567,0.0018430497,0.058170296,0.026765704,0.006204687,0.010803992,0.000934248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022033119,0.000013866725,0.00006474874,0.000046792924,0.000009594533,0.000015889516,0.00023927688,0.0005656933,0.000027042206,0.9967604,0.00055948517,0.0016750727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019174699,0.000006076468,0.000028301201,0.000031739157,0.0000032749867,0.000005001942,0.00003523492,0.0005417934,0.000029383724,0.99783605,0.0014598739,0.000004142503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013237421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058476883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055217813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035791371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24019814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259059179","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-21103-9_5","title":"Conductive Argumentation, Degrees of Confidence, and the Communication of Uncertainty","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Argumentation library","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Obligation; Epistemology; Position (finance); Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.08968408533064168,"score_gpt":0.2707410418836537,"score_spread":0.18105695655301204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259059179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011332848,0.015241813,0.11827183,0.033636782,0.0006818105,0.000051395637,0.00010673287,0.00018454119,0.8204922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90513605,0.006602208,0.01850522,0.0020183555,0.0011412592,0.00020683605,0.00012437385,0.00020380964,0.06606189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872351,0.009216248,0.0004871365,0.0005681933,0.0021396277,0.00035368506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735579,0.022569682,0.0009145584,0.0013054269,0.0012101345,0.00044230302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008337264,0.0008059422,0.00079250394,0.0029209158,0.0042324034,0.022966422,0.0023051274,0.0075279935,0.013430454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03417182,0.00048018026,0.00052683626,0.002914939,0.025360499,0.021293238,0.0058119725,0.0064046253,0.001932314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046414366,0.0000040634804,0.000016588796,0.000023076424,0.0000018508407,0.0000111754935,0.0008785258,0.000120187986,0.000018954634,0.9935574,0.0012423694,0.0041212365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033615574,0.0000020439768,0.00001867597,0.00007834606,0.0000015736894,0.000023677838,0.00043041952,0.00028904996,0.00005033436,0.9852248,0.013873873,0.00000385281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009099936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008264226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022966422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00520212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038334813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044929326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270106044","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2016.01.004","title":"Vision, knowledge, and assertion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Consciousness and Cognition","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Assertion; Attribution; Psychology; Perception; Object (grammar); Social psychology; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.031437683380987444,"score_gpt":0.27327609775244305,"score_spread":0.2418384143714556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270106044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08701795,0.023025615,0.11161058,0.065528214,0.0011713142,0.000096584496,0.00034387346,0.00020624607,0.7109996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982452,0.0018579087,0.008155218,0.001190376,0.00035117884,0.00007711852,0.00009977271,0.00004529852,0.005771077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943541,0.0034083333,0.00024025977,0.0007584869,0.0008425876,0.00039628407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920845,0.005033108,0.0006213236,0.0011366511,0.0007336616,0.00039071921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006361189,0.0004815072,0.0008045891,0.0026083903,0.004040859,0.013072464,0.001956393,0.0043247,0.006556095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014974836,0.00041855645,0.000625305,0.0019128725,0.05121583,0.014896493,0.0040455097,0.0037146187,0.0005964226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012900175,0.000009120972,0.00015790627,0.000037074726,0.000005274607,0.000021535721,0.0027333642,0.00011262796,0.00005420031,0.99207664,0.00080676825,0.0039726854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059864487,0.0000033939502,0.00010973473,0.00004271219,0.000003657667,0.00001968798,0.000946384,0.0001714839,0.000053019932,0.9939221,0.0047162264,0.000005542641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066248314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032139716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013072464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034192933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052062897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033641577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270115566","doi":"10.1561/107.00000009","title":"Meta-Rationality in Cognitive Science","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Behavior","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Ecological rationality; Great Rationality Debate; Epistemology; Cognition; Principle of rationality; Psychology; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.4114615557399521,"score_gpt":0.38542586922342364,"score_spread":0.026035686516528433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270115566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030203806,0.1557332,0.29008433,0.172309,0.003288659,0.00015494821,0.0003017695,0.00041517615,0.3475091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88812757,0.0241107,0.063171245,0.01031946,0.004994395,0.00041585244,0.00013286219,0.00014633864,0.008581621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848564,0.009040002,0.00062281016,0.0016996452,0.0031164263,0.00066476525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819119,0.0134983,0.0007998218,0.0021598968,0.0011665868,0.00046350234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019866202,0.0010576411,0.0015527708,0.0044396794,0.003012975,0.0098453,0.0022855503,0.0055129305,0.0031202368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01748245,0.0006371141,0.0015203411,0.0030973607,0.03619809,0.015487055,0.004381446,0.009187827,0.00066370773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055455907,0.0000063211896,0.000078382065,0.0000385662,0.000014408744,0.000016298543,0.0004173762,0.0004752431,0.000021620024,0.99602854,0.00062528986,0.0022724934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002834777,0.0000021502942,0.000030218594,0.000028321301,0.0000022317765,0.0000070791034,0.00004641007,0.0003645957,0.000016461716,0.99709547,0.0024016423,0.000002580919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002326568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013538433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019866202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074052396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038462982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10506374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271316954","doi":"","title":"Beyond Questionable Certainties","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.08435286807289265,"score_gpt":0.2566685653317343,"score_spread":0.17231569725884166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271316954","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010301598,0.012960919,0.009551648,0.5545712,0.007389527,0.00007390231,0.00022342651,0.00014031176,0.40478748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68130744,0.0067346618,0.0076783556,0.19440898,0.007446931,0.0002352507,0.00015692641,0.0002833228,0.10174818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98645765,0.0052492637,0.00044128025,0.0021320195,0.0040590405,0.0016606797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9650576,0.017640088,0.0011432766,0.0047885515,0.008986159,0.0023842375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021986641,0.0007218118,0.0011276943,0.0023180223,0.02113281,0.0137871215,0.0034826333,0.009853619,0.013867366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07355567,0.00036606047,0.0005995359,0.0017335304,0.06287889,0.011764663,0.005543928,0.01890762,0.0015483341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012952045,0.000007394986,0.00013311057,0.00003071047,0.0000053389194,0.000025039257,0.0028243894,0.000041140167,0.000035410663,0.9663172,0.026629286,0.003938147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014344066,0.0000069387847,0.0003798074,0.0003434409,0.000013116214,0.00003053913,0.0053875702,0.0002055258,0.00015275375,0.77261174,0.2208352,0.000019075282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21311368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21727197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21311368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022604441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029908067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4237464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283539597","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12264","title":"Relativism, Retraction, and Evidence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Taste; Citation; Epistemology; Psychology; History; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.5960111162237574,"score_gpt":0.4148227171307891,"score_spread":0.18118839909296824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283539597","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0496137,0.034968473,0.28296742,0.33831236,0.012342444,0.0005312136,0.000956226,0.00070247904,0.2796057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86780936,0.010052061,0.083526105,0.013426019,0.008017378,0.0009313533,0.00066767563,0.00037592195,0.015194126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9098672,0.056578495,0.006447464,0.013805817,0.010607245,0.0026937511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63249093,0.2658332,0.01611949,0.061025783,0.021609856,0.0029207824],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09830212,0.0013922262,0.0032927368,0.008652518,0.008048226,0.013701775,0.0061513213,0.012221485,0.016580561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35042715,0.0016164075,0.00223678,0.0055907867,0.055302296,0.04319199,0.013355769,0.014807234,0.0016309773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009052905,0.000020365085,0.0006828137,0.00040136333,0.000055386343,0.00011341543,0.0017785084,0.00019837337,0.00005317545,0.983491,0.0031992916,0.009915803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003412488,0.000013403354,0.00021721057,0.00026689214,0.00002795567,0.000085151216,0.00081229006,0.0003378302,0.00012659938,0.98662865,0.011431379,0.000018473993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002493865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001559091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98777854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006526406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008209111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5198775},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2284672934","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/9pcqk","title":"An Open and Shut Case: Epistemic Closure in the Manifest Image","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Epistemology; Ambivalence; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12290814369156448,"score_gpt":0.3216421648689699,"score_spread":0.1987340211774054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284672934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14992256,0.002214929,0.1671274,0.051077176,0.00067756214,0.00012433848,0.00017277282,0.0002533594,0.62842995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98689497,0.00022967074,0.006446308,0.00076466106,0.00011300052,0.00006564138,0.000029338838,0.00007836953,0.005378006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934673,0.0031679359,0.0002633218,0.0010329178,0.0013220924,0.0007465514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98403704,0.010597741,0.00078917143,0.0031304688,0.0008040238,0.00064160593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011587259,0.00038196295,0.0007366725,0.0015410798,0.0070380424,0.013522623,0.00141436,0.0066852504,0.008944208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030157158,0.0005059285,0.0010028831,0.0011593782,0.059726145,0.033991657,0.009719196,0.009279571,0.00074867473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011634598,0.0000042553306,0.0000802123,0.0000075375733,9.250614e-7,0.0000852944,0.0038404195,0.000031175823,0.000056618996,0.99459994,0.0003113442,0.0009705805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016201418,0.000009731133,0.0001071559,0.00004648879,0.0000053845793,0.00013948334,0.0030258973,0.00048072464,0.00024307726,0.9866621,0.009252122,0.000011639546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016047164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010411548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013522623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039428743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002625617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061280012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298495033","doi":"","title":"Emotion Does Not Have to Cause Harm to an Argument","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"York University Digital Library (York University)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Harm; Unit (ring theory); Public relations; Academic community; Sociology; Political science; Public policy; Public administration; Management; Psychology; Social science; Economics; Law; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.039674685070143205,"score_gpt":0.2042375596541849,"score_spread":0.1645628745840417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298495033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09560943,0.0018189037,0.10386536,0.08845919,0.003796719,0.00033090977,0.0002709961,0.00038226854,0.70546615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9370934,0.0006282823,0.027587784,0.009080112,0.00087324996,0.00043569904,0.00020164704,0.00019625288,0.023903482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.971076,0.012262579,0.0026547953,0.004057837,0.007048112,0.0029007036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9210671,0.046935264,0.0054139555,0.01444709,0.009631421,0.002505025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015931461,0.00083696115,0.001574119,0.0013048422,0.0050657387,0.006620349,0.002082085,0.013138206,0.014931396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0963715,0.0008537739,0.0021509246,0.0005214608,0.016312476,0.018310988,0.0085078385,0.00860962,0.003240744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019046401,0.00011284287,0.00095779187,0.00038503495,0.00016811372,0.0009885437,0.002811494,0.0005182991,0.0019709712,0.97622836,0.0054991078,0.010169005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011628845,0.000058465528,0.00055992126,0.0001996675,0.00012837388,0.00069660705,0.00111353,0.0009396141,0.0013440745,0.96140087,0.03341016,0.00003251209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003381375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037886176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015931461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021868923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026947702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08425462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2304176691","doi":"","title":"Commentary on Godden","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0577851769983521,"score_gpt":0.24113857192459956,"score_spread":0.18335339492624747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2304176691","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018244058,0.003941641,0.000038050774,0.96203375,0.029344333,0.000007430804,0.000040509127,0.0000073857505,0.004404427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030741126,0.0012431457,0.000074602896,0.97257406,0.012961563,0.000033288045,0.0000143172,0.00003387933,0.009991033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867098,0.0042366157,0.00077092135,0.0028766333,0.0035884161,0.0018176279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96212643,0.026482128,0.001361274,0.0012668724,0.0057510007,0.0030122297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016752793,0.0012021472,0.003312103,0.0021711695,0.018391714,0.009840012,0.005231027,0.061581932,0.013081751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0767745,0.0012445071,0.0017786905,0.0025146191,0.01931685,0.010113867,0.008407661,0.07666113,0.0049564545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016473063,0.0000045100956,0.000036174908,0.00006484941,0.0000071006757,0.000118250966,0.0009653329,0.000010486347,0.000014075545,0.012512462,0.9850247,0.0012255234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033076038,0.000006841763,0.00022326743,0.000670404,0.00001741848,0.000091242655,0.0023698218,0.000027509217,0.00006722019,0.010630786,0.98583674,0.000025638428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042752795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0780752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061581932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012216783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017045109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08863932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313633624","doi":"10.2307/2653426","title":"Virtue Epistemology and the Epistemology of Virtue","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemic virtue; Epistemology; Philosophy; Meta-epistemology; Philosophy of mind; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Social epistemology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.18229631021101286,"score_gpt":0.3442842049268116,"score_spread":0.16198789471579875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313633624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057754636,0.026705792,0.06879957,0.046052642,0.0013309087,0.000063185675,0.000108185755,0.00009047987,0.7990947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96578526,0.004939102,0.011071821,0.003415562,0.0010319779,0.00010703732,0.000058132944,0.000041905067,0.013549129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961184,0.0026456024,0.00013296753,0.0003305267,0.00050709693,0.00026543322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956376,0.0028945082,0.00033339483,0.00045230746,0.00037883827,0.00030339824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049877167,0.00032796364,0.00062129216,0.0025109749,0.0030709577,0.0059645195,0.00078270416,0.0030183524,0.003566255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052936203,0.00026205988,0.0004858178,0.0014943954,0.051671132,0.008022248,0.0041001085,0.0041635646,0.00067401736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002942561,0.0000035911733,0.000093334915,0.000021719557,0.0000016319522,0.000018457742,0.0007310803,0.00005131573,0.000023862163,0.9967482,0.00035711858,0.001946871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042819247,0.000004702626,0.00017202664,0.000034555273,7.925993e-7,0.000038847575,0.00032100215,0.00012935208,0.000022465354,0.98855317,0.01071546,0.0000032956666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009929702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080989674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059645195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028405788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002196842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026377857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313683257","doi":"10.1177/171516350714001s02","title":"A Skeptic's Collaborative Experience","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pharmacists Association","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06481746601098676,"score_gpt":0.2915163502584931,"score_spread":0.22669888424750634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313683257","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31040096,0.004021645,0.006400734,0.35919017,0.007103698,0.0001785088,0.00014275174,0.00032970693,0.31223184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89014095,0.0012543274,0.0013542034,0.039696377,0.00067133835,0.00006232244,0.0000588167,0.00024766938,0.06651405],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.939726,0.038881484,0.0011789972,0.0028520203,0.010536165,0.0068253353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9176355,0.03665614,0.0034389608,0.0030744674,0.01831461,0.020880355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027081523,0.0007567324,0.0011704364,0.0025529966,0.07978254,0.024984367,0.004266267,0.017044222,0.013474968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.089541405,0.00083223404,0.0011075177,0.0023473708,0.028273173,0.009522188,0.016241828,0.023666808,0.0020897049],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002351434,0.00034971433,0.0040716063,0.000117670344,0.000046441033,0.009827367,0.77063185,0.00023158483,0.0006011948,0.08262964,0.1086192,0.02263867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004653118,0.00010373072,0.001014664,0.00021838248,0.000026072294,0.003918896,0.59011465,0.0003909526,0.0002803736,0.0096675,0.3941071,0.000111102745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12551385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15345818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12551385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026463196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045118466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24956656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317644171","doi":"10.1017/s0012217313000656","title":"Lotteries, Knowledge, and Irrelevant Alternatives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Assertion; Epistemology; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.0467119708768763,"score_gpt":0.25889552336611943,"score_spread":0.21218355248924314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317644171","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13999781,0.0073466133,0.37342423,0.10473755,0.0010780523,0.00015001772,0.00016616592,0.00018610756,0.37291342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780779,0.0007511608,0.01470379,0.0022951053,0.00029113694,0.000104375904,0.000031414886,0.000040790503,0.0037044089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819718,0.012709172,0.00063775806,0.0014376316,0.002559388,0.0006843091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9638263,0.028538862,0.0020459858,0.0030430404,0.001747908,0.00079797953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018173765,0.0005986223,0.00081831595,0.0025221533,0.0049680145,0.007108598,0.0022153733,0.005742101,0.0041629714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035386402,0.00051971315,0.0010737195,0.0015759966,0.049913954,0.01797874,0.005365652,0.007322823,0.0003991745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005156592,0.000003118767,0.000028806206,0.000011540623,0.0000022303834,0.000023434628,0.00048561502,0.00010932878,0.000021538033,0.9984688,0.00014233496,0.0006980489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003752637,0.0000020606612,0.000019013803,0.0000121175435,0.0000014642015,0.000012836949,0.0001684884,0.00026405492,0.000033876157,0.9982352,0.001243847,0.0000032693272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010538835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018173765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004390064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00250827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096113205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320056789","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzs032","title":"Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity, by John Greco.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemic virtue; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04099503176027172,"score_gpt":0.2752202346472124,"score_spread":0.23422520288694068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320056789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072082095,0.15459491,0.019514618,0.24359982,0.004102986,0.000039679227,0.00013007552,0.00010990027,0.57069975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6584272,0.09654854,0.012544063,0.043720078,0.00624776,0.00024436088,0.0002067241,0.00024166098,0.18181956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908364,0.00041685128,0.000033856508,0.0001256228,0.00026711245,0.00007292907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988558,0.00073433155,0.0000800278,0.00006720853,0.00018965309,0.0000729692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014990631,0.00043142334,0.00026647915,0.0008427752,0.0028161914,0.0050171516,0.0005940908,0.0023740535,0.00233183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046397797,0.00031270733,0.00031798167,0.0013963246,0.010531754,0.007952088,0.0015927273,0.0036926442,0.0008116625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075191333,0.000011667015,0.000087585526,0.000048732185,0.0000040933833,0.000030207551,0.0010325353,0.00025304416,0.00004754795,0.9289325,0.06219068,0.0073539494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006938685,0.0000037303962,0.00032517736,0.0001534208,0.0000032583048,0.00005069225,0.00056561676,0.00035093763,0.000066410845,0.81816715,0.18029879,0.000007920661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008819312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0101050865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008819312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042292476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031381845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030685484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320808839","doi":"10.1215/00318108-2683576","title":"When Truth Gives Out","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Epistemology; Normative; Rationality; Irish; Property (philosophy); Analytic philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Subject (documents); Sociology; Aesthetics; Contemporary philosophy; Linguistics; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.15160631348221734,"score_gpt":0.3153493341004285,"score_spread":0.16374302061821114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320808839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077440613,0.0041667116,0.012449341,0.09460583,0.010124376,0.00008570447,0.00031861055,0.00041279744,0.8700924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6890918,0.004042409,0.0052003046,0.031362955,0.005714836,0.00022474401,0.00045963243,0.0010902338,0.26281315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.985502,0.004514752,0.00082891114,0.0022609201,0.0041771415,0.0027162158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920989,0.0033463878,0.00063510635,0.0015219478,0.0016697451,0.0007279749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0090190135,0.00062185904,0.0008243211,0.002192054,0.009660271,0.02272357,0.001572284,0.00782932,0.055662632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035223417,0.00069254666,0.00079576403,0.0014733977,0.025055466,0.025225524,0.009873327,0.008724043,0.014637629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003957003,0.000007690558,0.00030375368,0.00006787888,0.000009422417,0.0003189766,0.011471714,0.000045284483,0.00013116891,0.94167465,0.037743084,0.008186792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018679357,0.000019393712,0.00029952655,0.00040085823,0.000016674812,0.00031526136,0.014856921,0.00015430457,0.00051440176,0.5361154,0.44725606,0.000032524757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004408872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003658676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055662632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007649116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051243487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18621004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322233634","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01714.x","title":"Distant Peers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Epistemology; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.23389744417782146,"score_gpt":0.24805714729496037,"score_spread":0.014159703117138905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322233634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04844198,0.002589282,0.062031906,0.055123236,0.0011640176,0.0001465906,0.00012055384,0.00022143219,0.83016104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9387935,0.00088551285,0.0054500294,0.0051282435,0.00050042005,0.0000643416,0.000058772668,0.000094296294,0.049024824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99060094,0.004826348,0.00026117725,0.0017303979,0.0019083817,0.0006726513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898608,0.0038118951,0.0011100136,0.0015112361,0.0019549932,0.0017510327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046106246,0.00050634966,0.00052320235,0.0012945246,0.0052149133,0.0075205932,0.0016813779,0.004197625,0.036180254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018613541,0.00027088486,0.0003659769,0.00072819786,0.0147015955,0.010649857,0.007703563,0.003911196,0.003990555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028522212,0.000023326575,0.0005560326,0.000060233135,0.000015061774,0.00031782087,0.0049598105,0.00031328044,0.00033575235,0.9760558,0.006558126,0.010776276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026586114,0.00003983109,0.00055255584,0.00014486948,0.00001782667,0.00036794605,0.0073743453,0.001148576,0.00044537187,0.8533675,0.13648531,0.000029177645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016889964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011743758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036180254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030632422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015306212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12103504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324823836","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i1.4294","title":"Being a Correct Presumption vs. Being Presumably the Case","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Correctness; Presumption; Epistemology; Modal; Order (exchange); Speech act; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Economics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.055784847355519786,"score_gpt":0.261305293653185,"score_spread":0.20552044629766522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324823836","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08998393,0.0029164753,0.44988158,0.066333756,0.001616189,0.00027154933,0.0005461561,0.00037460157,0.3880757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95012337,0.0008400115,0.037710454,0.0022196446,0.0006063488,0.00016695342,0.00014952212,0.0001494611,0.008034246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98910856,0.0050822543,0.0011869567,0.0018543316,0.0019111501,0.0008567693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9680136,0.020226648,0.004269009,0.004141566,0.0025476906,0.00080160296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0141021395,0.00061259547,0.00082242116,0.0019318803,0.003161131,0.0072246916,0.0030735487,0.005579465,0.011930205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033119544,0.0006801646,0.0011237715,0.0012493916,0.02551454,0.016633298,0.005680752,0.0062492318,0.002510157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002644648,0.000009565154,0.00039795847,0.00003771967,0.0000073683636,0.00010291328,0.0018544162,0.00009614728,0.00022664006,0.9941414,0.00064923224,0.002450179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021121796,0.000043399665,0.0014169439,0.00017791163,0.000046399426,0.00044230392,0.0026740665,0.0018352529,0.0017848987,0.9648769,0.026642162,0.00003875782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016303842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013388091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0141021395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025823899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018137435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07458019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334047895","doi":"10.1017/s0012217313000711","title":"Les raisons épistémiques sont-elles instrumentales?","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07566229811969474,"score_gpt":0.28578859417235025,"score_spread":0.2101262960526555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334047895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034265988,0.021571593,0.18992876,0.115559235,0.0028709588,0.00013075605,0.00021884385,0.00026433758,0.6351895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91045123,0.008772497,0.0316649,0.008254787,0.0015428717,0.00027843702,0.00011776506,0.00023457439,0.038682863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97474,0.016041588,0.0009051038,0.0027523036,0.003780634,0.0017804187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806169,0.011820998,0.0015161353,0.0028590858,0.0024699708,0.00071686145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017044814,0.0009303919,0.001136059,0.0023372541,0.0057392893,0.019477244,0.0023045156,0.0058294116,0.009654785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03041278,0.0007088576,0.0011626624,0.002245205,0.047884263,0.030221252,0.0095345685,0.010460814,0.002356947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001150583,0.000006822429,0.00014962352,0.00005876292,0.000008930949,0.000027998938,0.003884233,0.000037326132,0.0000734442,0.99212635,0.0005142461,0.0031006662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015943722,0.000019264235,0.00047009793,0.00029760005,0.000021738162,0.00011447089,0.010612447,0.00024642562,0.0005581832,0.88073593,0.10688419,0.000023785251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002732019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031327934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019477244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005076182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006883944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09014267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335090607","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i1.4469","title":"Denying the Antecedent: The Fallacy That Never Was, or Sometimes Isn’t?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); sort; Section (typography); Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Positive economics; Computer science; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.13073839555469155,"score_gpt":0.27912212409223525,"score_spread":0.1483837285375437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335090607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18697529,0.00620802,0.2374031,0.1409183,0.004403195,0.00022395658,0.00028809754,0.00047758548,0.4231024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97722137,0.0008757303,0.009671773,0.004769461,0.0008438385,0.00006340872,0.00007789704,0.0001411214,0.0063352627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98646975,0.0064942013,0.0007902205,0.0025085823,0.003073531,0.00066372723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96898806,0.021431485,0.0020436805,0.0040883357,0.0028136095,0.00063485024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014860131,0.000486115,0.0011109742,0.0017510602,0.006224831,0.0065353904,0.0023850526,0.0061495313,0.0070749577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040947948,0.0007508204,0.0005160922,0.0013196127,0.044622857,0.016522968,0.005909934,0.012377476,0.0010760429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058022688,0.00002481345,0.0006205925,0.00009086386,0.000015583106,0.00021004396,0.008028579,0.0001144654,0.0003550072,0.9829648,0.0018054873,0.005711575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000358415,0.000037479807,0.0009660395,0.00045513114,0.000050663333,0.00035707778,0.0066302298,0.0012373823,0.001639295,0.94744253,0.04111251,0.000035745514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004181978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030401857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014860131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039750836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003625578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07858884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335807053","doi":"10.1075/ld.5.2.02col","title":"Disagreement and the speaker’s point of view","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Utterance; Assertion; Meaning (existential); Dialogic; Linguistics; Conversation; Perspective (graphical); Value (mathematics); Point (geometry); Truth value; Normative; Psychology; Function (biology); Relativism; Truth condition; Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05636213227530506,"score_gpt":0.26306258807132754,"score_spread":0.20670045579602248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335807053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.128138,0.0036661378,0.15762055,0.15116492,0.00178354,0.000118884294,0.0000988167,0.00019090282,0.5572182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98578703,0.00036215113,0.0047609885,0.0031265146,0.0003485583,0.00007350498,0.000028782577,0.00007511302,0.0054373364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9354081,0.04227528,0.0023326376,0.006023457,0.01026873,0.0036916905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9678905,0.021501783,0.0024924872,0.003198882,0.0038896438,0.0010267973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03608434,0.0007418279,0.0014714306,0.0032334866,0.010943711,0.01635314,0.003526408,0.015663775,0.004473276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048480537,0.0010385178,0.001340113,0.0016887882,0.05486129,0.02666571,0.015399958,0.015508161,0.0010304507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019621892,0.0000070184274,0.00019808697,0.000029082445,0.0000111848885,0.00020797283,0.029609589,0.00012256515,0.00017434548,0.96692765,0.0007875671,0.0019053018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002846426,0.000017618495,0.00015489887,0.00017162347,0.000017736944,0.00022953279,0.018847967,0.00075363537,0.00044392352,0.95018613,0.029106352,0.00004210124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016787084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007562721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03608434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065326486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003652266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19083452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337315440","doi":"10.1080/09515089.2015.1065314","title":"Knowledge, certainty, and assertion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Assertion; Certainty; Norm (philosophy); Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16230429036707034,"score_gpt":0.37073504930790435,"score_spread":0.20843075894083402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337315440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5289998,0.0050747325,0.043238644,0.039863553,0.0005458433,0.00008883935,0.00013209395,0.00009652289,0.38195992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99590564,0.00030230745,0.0021904476,0.00057298347,0.00006387364,0.000020735586,0.00001591315,0.0000092762,0.0009188563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833414,0.011467035,0.0007537188,0.0011600339,0.0025997544,0.00067802804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94850934,0.036564108,0.005923351,0.004291139,0.003115951,0.0015962222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013236997,0.00030226394,0.00046585538,0.001184781,0.0023109973,0.0052518095,0.00079420384,0.0023015824,0.0057486193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0569325,0.00028835726,0.0003606449,0.00071605766,0.023411544,0.010633502,0.003951995,0.0025458848,0.00036908296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018836712,0.00008162206,0.0068540783,0.00023180559,0.0000390805,0.00014589098,0.013454259,0.0005496582,0.00080462033,0.9529665,0.0009968613,0.023687288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054227505,0.000119173776,0.0067979894,0.00022946452,0.000032721884,0.00019766916,0.006835099,0.0012679917,0.0006549531,0.9695389,0.014230198,0.00004163016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017340025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091751537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013236997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017903995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016291157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07000476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338011633","doi":"","title":"Deep Disagreement, Rational Resolutions, and Critical Thinking","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Epistemology; Key (lock); Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06903815881425727,"score_gpt":0.296677684418392,"score_spread":0.2276395256041347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338011633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0817032,0.022535656,0.17912947,0.22627833,0.0026230046,0.00026426202,0.00010066066,0.00024775215,0.4871176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96302915,0.0022912326,0.02060546,0.005741248,0.00076435006,0.00020837224,0.000040812578,0.00006904745,0.007250333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747546,0.01765665,0.00072091946,0.0017579128,0.0036549005,0.0014550673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791748,0.015783986,0.0016817764,0.0013111604,0.0014158048,0.0006324942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01895528,0.0008426757,0.000823357,0.003336547,0.008391651,0.012730251,0.0021833656,0.008402225,0.003332818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024937779,0.00055577257,0.0008345414,0.0020182233,0.064792804,0.016561562,0.008352693,0.009633916,0.00052685937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008130141,0.000009044382,0.000059753922,0.000027600267,0.0000065573327,0.000039336042,0.0027722565,0.00024037466,0.00002998739,0.99379224,0.0009930858,0.0020216894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009218529,0.0000020122745,0.00001902555,0.00002445281,0.0000018401643,0.000009050768,0.0005713348,0.0001917063,0.00003200756,0.99494547,0.004190345,0.0000036019499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021717295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013491496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01895528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008662991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037836996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10024625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342721975","doi":"10.1111/nous.12132","title":"Truth Incorporated","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Noûs","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Pragmatic theory of truth; Value (mathematics); Truth value; Alethiology; Dialectic; Perspective (graphical); Coherence theory of truth; Semantic theory of truth; Cognition; Field (mathematics); Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2759284876211445,"score_gpt":0.2893217167283361,"score_spread":0.013393229107191595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342721975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010170773,0.0016791108,0.03285026,0.011272587,0.0019214895,0.0000985161,0.0004934009,0.000320951,0.9411929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7600272,0.0022987225,0.022327077,0.006349713,0.0013292218,0.00015771783,0.0012568344,0.0004672635,0.2057863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99550784,0.0013151395,0.00034919038,0.00089826004,0.0014657798,0.00046388214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961093,0.0011644268,0.00026936966,0.0009568294,0.0012846171,0.00021551998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038590755,0.00052129384,0.00046293816,0.0021502748,0.0030984534,0.0103443805,0.0013081902,0.0026198917,0.04569056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01012599,0.00032699146,0.00073011604,0.0014941891,0.0056474786,0.01140716,0.0057275333,0.0029044403,0.0076265424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039364415,0.000009372535,0.00021940115,0.00009972375,0.000009576689,0.0001302269,0.0034300515,0.00009720838,0.00030333805,0.9646001,0.006001201,0.025060397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001541672,0.000031046908,0.00043802848,0.0003192212,0.00002999319,0.0003129947,0.002806908,0.0006145819,0.0011280054,0.54765034,0.44662932,0.000024219511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001908028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017927333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04569056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038953682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022109782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15285015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346631310","doi":"10.3998/ergo.12405314.0003.008","title":"A New Paradigm for Epistemology From Reliabilism to Abilism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; University of Waterloo; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1834604714436106,"score_gpt":0.39416729191176164,"score_spread":0.21070682046815103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346631310","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027295962,0.008769276,0.7069632,0.07214444,0.0013888591,0.0001509369,0.0002292363,0.00041664008,0.1826415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82609236,0.0032817794,0.15047131,0.008345332,0.0019438069,0.00067761296,0.00015155145,0.00026120245,0.008774996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98691237,0.008531192,0.000523488,0.00137899,0.0021796685,0.00047427745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759393,0.016837887,0.0012125279,0.0036596374,0.0016650825,0.00068564824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017864913,0.0010070993,0.0014632897,0.004395509,0.0035007212,0.009411847,0.0030832684,0.0038373272,0.0053622024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021565588,0.0006892906,0.0014195692,0.0025544541,0.050084103,0.022003105,0.00942847,0.011431323,0.0010065928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008019567,0.000006916827,0.0000862243,0.000035938257,0.0000054036345,0.000016750482,0.00075443374,0.00016669728,0.00005504185,0.99609596,0.00040227812,0.002366375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062600416,0.000008826095,0.00005623425,0.000024375442,0.000002218968,0.000024637664,0.00015565738,0.00052244583,0.000048408303,0.9937431,0.005402567,0.000005270528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012824617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009622066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017864913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044228337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035682484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0944798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2361290106","doi":"","title":"On the View of James Robert Brown's on Thought Experiments","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ziran bianzhengfa yanjiu","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalism; Philosophy; Epistemology; A priori and a posteriori; Thought experiment; Field (mathematics); Environmental ethics; Classics; History; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10641305794265854,"score_gpt":0.29353106461356593,"score_spread":0.1871180066709074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2361290106","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004987024,0.03706253,0.042869445,0.70916224,0.008236061,0.0001401508,0.00018379273,0.0001649946,0.19719365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35881805,0.02741119,0.053999808,0.465882,0.015923508,0.0012530984,0.0001388971,0.0005605791,0.07601278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97146726,0.01810799,0.0007270719,0.0032060402,0.0056374567,0.000854279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9602983,0.02918983,0.0012934437,0.0031377506,0.0045002108,0.0015804633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028226279,0.00093466026,0.0014223523,0.0030372676,0.0047863913,0.009248406,0.002793395,0.010877423,0.0043642544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034397297,0.00060071924,0.0008192171,0.0018917414,0.0683933,0.015084405,0.004762705,0.020174796,0.0013106294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013852331,0.000007792657,0.00002428203,0.00003923017,0.0000029266976,0.000007841547,0.0006337027,0.000050967825,0.000042557236,0.98816353,0.009655148,0.0013581818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004482445,0.00001755287,0.000083254,0.00020422702,0.000007935183,0.000021092228,0.00048317167,0.0001831336,0.00019516455,0.85603535,0.1426995,0.000024857934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073774694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057777455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028226279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008626152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007136894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14927655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2377025835","doi":"","title":"Agreeing to Disagree","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hunan University of Science & Technology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Prevention of Organ Failure","funders":"","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Common knowledge (logic); Law and economics; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Physics","score_opus":0.020447434338599593,"score_gpt":0.2162057012369398,"score_spread":0.1957582668983402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2377025835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08950459,0.0024679904,0.038877442,0.26618782,0.012347833,0.0008705576,0.0009221542,0.00022508315,0.5885965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8764828,0.0016261016,0.009948411,0.08410796,0.00392377,0.00063138414,0.00059789076,0.00011425439,0.02256751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9382365,0.035321977,0.0041200137,0.0058207824,0.011259201,0.0052415202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8953142,0.062988736,0.0065738535,0.011726848,0.017729895,0.005666527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032883663,0.00054963655,0.0008620758,0.0012668462,0.0038057847,0.006357971,0.0022372813,0.007957933,0.023970153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16715792,0.00045368884,0.000812961,0.0011260015,0.009358918,0.007438382,0.006693634,0.0078012845,0.0037876035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000494131,0.00014486568,0.017852494,0.0006701237,0.000541907,0.0023506344,0.0323184,0.0010107803,0.001624905,0.67685336,0.17052986,0.09560854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001523974,0.000048646372,0.0048776707,0.00048479624,0.0001249965,0.0007647273,0.020290358,0.0015176643,0.00075186096,0.7595824,0.21127945,0.00012510859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001155494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011595075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032883663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016212573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034741159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17390752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2409494481","doi":"10.47925/2015.273","title":"Counteracting Epistemic Totality and Weakening Mental Rigidities: The Antitotalitarian Nature of Wonderment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Chemistry","score_opus":0.08140904244587957,"score_gpt":0.31785963290251384,"score_spread":0.23645059045663427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2409494481","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15385237,0.0010641124,0.45336562,0.047462035,0.0005609463,0.00013047275,0.00014406552,0.00067425024,0.342746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762014,0.000121970465,0.01747838,0.0008197192,0.00008082487,0.00007602525,0.000024059844,0.00013762049,0.0050599277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887102,0.0070771435,0.00049493334,0.0015232072,0.0013341884,0.0008603331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9580744,0.020767406,0.0028864092,0.014342731,0.0027364772,0.001192479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015743699,0.00068667775,0.0011887861,0.0010566249,0.0037548146,0.0073719225,0.0020309417,0.0030097566,0.009843622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043165892,0.00079205784,0.0010536124,0.0008070009,0.033997875,0.016170198,0.012369132,0.0063644177,0.00074325723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036420483,0.0000115114535,0.00013690472,0.0000375354,0.000010375481,0.00002196263,0.0015933668,0.0005746302,0.0002475216,0.9935167,0.00051595434,0.00329723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016355316,0.0000060264438,0.00006060486,0.000014718445,0.0000050378326,0.0000138391,0.00024999375,0.001041812,0.00018111551,0.9967699,0.0016342424,0.000006354973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010930727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015502231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015743699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023613495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035849614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08326167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2413561503","doi":"10.12978/jat.2016-4.122413150417a","title":"John Stackhouse’s Vocation-Centered Epistemology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Analytic Theology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.05676491895392546,"score_gpt":0.2786996993982315,"score_spread":0.22193478044430606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2413561503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009710649,0.019012466,0.09570918,0.30460346,0.010841154,0.00007686622,0.00023481615,0.0001676978,0.55964375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6682331,0.012029192,0.0606535,0.051795315,0.012678065,0.00030699838,0.00024744237,0.0006440301,0.1934124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99534875,0.0026398434,0.00019158894,0.0006261489,0.000911352,0.0002822841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993652,0.0039372128,0.00022610245,0.0007289647,0.0010784327,0.0003772968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005033713,0.0006820685,0.0008463265,0.0030104478,0.0069217375,0.009345263,0.0014413429,0.0044901557,0.006757146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011805909,0.0004383409,0.0007448579,0.0021646123,0.032836776,0.014589288,0.0045586596,0.008711294,0.0014653521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028806212,0.000004376158,0.00002309162,0.000010333586,0.00000225622,0.000013828471,0.00091957604,0.000046006062,0.000013490139,0.9897956,0.0075424723,0.0016261355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004358452,0.0000021612063,0.000026270392,0.000048217702,0.0000024868452,0.000019431705,0.0004556611,0.00011897177,0.00005110377,0.92959,0.06967513,0.0000062809845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008551484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009151259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009345263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00402567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004107022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029208422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467380273","doi":"10.1093/analys/anw043","title":"<i>Assertion: on the Philosophical Significance of Assertoric Speech</i>By Sanford G. Goldberg","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05649360545132209,"score_gpt":0.26099393978031865,"score_spread":0.20450033432899656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467380273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020847201,0.11308367,0.026006583,0.3406955,0.012863455,0.000042340715,0.00010433994,0.00013886018,0.4862181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73443687,0.041361872,0.0112773655,0.05738993,0.012927932,0.00019076926,0.00015463929,0.0002991997,0.14196144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980532,0.0012184114,0.00005573415,0.00021184591,0.00038296846,0.00007791368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996409,0.0028618097,0.00015135371,0.00014275592,0.0003360658,0.00009908284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024810892,0.0004186564,0.0003465191,0.000802462,0.0023113955,0.0041133873,0.00075974583,0.0018061135,0.0017113384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046870406,0.00025920765,0.00042255037,0.0010802818,0.013316831,0.007119817,0.0017048636,0.0062634083,0.0008060034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023182825,0.0000131225015,0.00019216057,0.00007461116,0.0000064395467,0.000083209925,0.0065764147,0.00017067969,0.00020334563,0.9176081,0.06420661,0.010842132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014623715,0.000024228884,0.00070606306,0.00044219074,0.000010784909,0.00019134967,0.001974105,0.00073870743,0.00023147858,0.5866499,0.4089953,0.000021339096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035303882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026489936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041133873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031202973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016881275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022639513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468793022","doi":"10.1017/s0953820816000170","title":"Effort and Achievement","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Competence (human resources); Distributive justice; Epistemology; Distributive property; Positive economics; Sociology; Economic Justice; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05411237397655988,"score_gpt":0.25748381885523397,"score_spread":0.2033714448786741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468793022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08307832,0.01391718,0.018898172,0.015867656,0.00039441275,0.000035883757,0.00008132057,0.00005896218,0.86766815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97146446,0.0038790167,0.00197731,0.00054247165,0.00026449503,0.00003344444,0.000040340426,0.0000334874,0.021765044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965233,0.0017598001,0.00012302169,0.0003943493,0.00068630965,0.0005131014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964057,0.0016024939,0.0005586336,0.0003166525,0.00044506224,0.00067147944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002764046,0.00051928184,0.00031275235,0.0015881903,0.0020313011,0.007943602,0.00071333535,0.0015719539,0.00614186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057075303,0.000104973326,0.0002589256,0.0015519062,0.01681382,0.0055712587,0.0060680793,0.0016998159,0.00087708666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001199946,0.000016386512,0.0010081616,0.000051346655,0.0000058683777,0.0000348311,0.003260703,0.00013815305,0.00006793023,0.98039037,0.0006505566,0.014363673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008681974,0.00006091361,0.0049599647,0.00022836713,0.000010753809,0.00013105695,0.004659656,0.0003103504,0.00021847061,0.8937062,0.09568991,0.000015692818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010588564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010492972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007943602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002175371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001218386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020546615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474203456","doi":"10.1111/nous.12160","title":"Reconsidering Intentions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Noûs","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Agency (philosophy); Action (physics); Epistemology; Economic Justice; Ecological rationality; Computer science; Psychology; Economics; Philosophy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.25890184482554673,"score_gpt":0.2808807652306056,"score_spread":0.021978920405058888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474203456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118466124,0.0020400668,0.1729351,0.025758868,0.00074211456,0.00008965472,0.00011299864,0.00027223804,0.67958283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97073394,0.00045678823,0.01243491,0.001343864,0.00013724914,0.000058496273,0.000055430715,0.00009561725,0.014683743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930218,0.003575981,0.00030849763,0.0010278685,0.0012062693,0.0008595849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925162,0.0036532357,0.0005287281,0.0018812808,0.0010350987,0.0003854213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006444593,0.00040608968,0.0005031888,0.00093583507,0.0024036225,0.006613936,0.001259008,0.0035940225,0.005001354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009665874,0.00044005766,0.0010381478,0.00055778463,0.023613272,0.009955914,0.0058829566,0.005290616,0.0008191804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008527737,0.0000064644,0.0001698472,0.000016323356,0.0000041323106,0.0000676423,0.0026520602,0.00039822314,0.00015537407,0.9935961,0.00041362533,0.0025116971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010291935,0.000014956764,0.00026458385,0.00007633288,0.000010722607,0.00006933479,0.0018504189,0.0015729199,0.00036664493,0.96489954,0.03084978,0.000014490125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044495496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00360094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006613936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003725328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034298957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03408265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W24743767","doi":"10.1007/978-90-481-2381-0_1","title":"Mental Transparency, Direct Sensation, and the Unity of the Cartesian Mind","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in the history of philosophy of mind","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Sensation; Cartesian coordinate system; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Geometry; Computer security","score_opus":0.14527492739262626,"score_gpt":0.27416024771737413,"score_spread":0.12888532032474787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W24743767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0526823,0.029426148,0.08001729,0.023506751,0.0005285298,0.00002903827,0.0001037824,0.00011791732,0.8135882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629308,0.003450292,0.008806063,0.0007511626,0.000318247,0.000038033595,0.00003779524,0.00005482502,0.023612788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987357,0.00076098536,0.000040777173,0.00015288603,0.00022875548,0.00008094728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704164,0.0023466086,0.00013164764,0.00026681574,0.00014389527,0.00006925431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014933514,0.00036100092,0.00038429903,0.00080421346,0.0015947175,0.006245978,0.0007109166,0.0020949356,0.005114792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046820557,0.00029132282,0.00034451997,0.0008867706,0.028474743,0.009641057,0.0020024355,0.004224974,0.0004359872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060610732,0.0000022320826,0.00003139555,0.00001632031,0.0000010413999,0.000008861604,0.0016932318,0.00006259216,0.000050003335,0.99583036,0.0004525823,0.0018452479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039876495,0.0000033178292,0.000106811516,0.000028553579,0.0000014274284,0.000033201795,0.00051038514,0.00013702124,0.00006709883,0.99034965,0.008755825,0.0000027711878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021347997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018552665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006245978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017889275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015472001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017110705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477333637","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511973499.005","title":"FROM COST–BENEFIT ANALYSIS TO ETHICS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.1281805563729595,"score_gpt":0.2472813004462426,"score_spread":0.11910074407328311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477333637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046502613,0.06994339,0.30401233,0.057479545,0.0022873231,0.00026313987,0.00023823568,0.00012542805,0.5610004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5127326,0.122206636,0.1865668,0.025293885,0.0074945567,0.002227511,0.0003396724,0.0005027095,0.14263572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954424,0.002831134,0.000147656,0.00025285946,0.0011389272,0.00018708737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938328,0.005195567,0.00016832915,0.00027566447,0.00045181578,0.00007575404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058915797,0.0012692756,0.0007537104,0.0024330183,0.0012191092,0.0045031016,0.0014416702,0.0032990072,0.009779456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010216747,0.0004895857,0.0007394249,0.002002223,0.010790887,0.0072792647,0.0023246582,0.0054017995,0.0013705578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033082367,0.000007870159,0.000028604982,0.00008099425,0.0000054000925,0.000021462505,0.00014561137,0.0014992472,0.000033861907,0.98590744,0.004823668,0.007442494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025618397,0.000006368601,0.000043903176,0.00016535074,0.0000028902878,0.000018161878,0.00009327227,0.000820021,0.00004902174,0.9541209,0.044672936,0.000004571479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001985425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014091247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009779456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006123747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024600762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04443115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477656499","doi":"10.11647/obp.0083.03","title":"3. Objections and Replies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; National Endowment for the Humanities","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0784390136909983,"score_gpt":0.2653694012196088,"score_spread":0.18693038752861046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477656499","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016601852,0.006082544,0.0018048935,0.8200261,0.061451305,0.000045618337,0.00023035733,0.00024407903,0.10845484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046882335,0.005191912,0.0027671296,0.7261516,0.047388587,0.0003291591,0.0002858423,0.00061253697,0.17039087],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874099,0.0038526836,0.00085883297,0.0017309916,0.0049553486,0.0011923477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97597355,0.012970549,0.0008638609,0.0020017547,0.0073396773,0.00085061317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015026904,0.0011275418,0.0009972901,0.001979062,0.0063912394,0.011739704,0.004634744,0.019031113,0.028582534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07092629,0.00052490045,0.0020164195,0.0023129717,0.0095250085,0.011698103,0.005836706,0.024122484,0.01498406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047755027,0.00003489397,0.00032974966,0.00016762223,0.000017217813,0.00023746357,0.0041994615,0.00011477805,0.00018153623,0.27952406,0.7013533,0.013792149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070414426,0.000009521495,0.00021963354,0.00030263074,0.000013608326,0.00023405682,0.0033262153,0.00017601057,0.00020861026,0.049103804,0.946369,0.000029876726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050549717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032537375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028582534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071833404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037950773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09561813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W248404143","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-5934-3_8","title":"Bi-Level Virtue Epistemology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemic virtue; Virtue; Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology of Wikipedia; Meta-epistemology; Social epistemology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.12706995796281878,"score_gpt":0.2599633051427643,"score_spread":0.1328933471799455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W248404143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010442958,0.003406719,0.118928805,0.00815031,0.00038334655,0.00006089575,0.000119879456,0.0001233176,0.8583839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80620193,0.0024609712,0.06404097,0.0030331681,0.0006487272,0.00036252296,0.00026771176,0.00022741797,0.12275658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763846,0.0010724558,0.0000948951,0.00033832682,0.0006416783,0.00021416147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809283,0.0008574529,0.0000852852,0.00045194032,0.00034597924,0.00016648375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003058625,0.0004381191,0.0007736259,0.0017730918,0.002940076,0.008625977,0.0013210047,0.0021674384,0.012194903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031366975,0.00037693404,0.00052613247,0.0014448157,0.014795052,0.008154389,0.0039824476,0.005102558,0.0023435515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012339452,0.0000035439725,0.000038732836,0.0000098115825,0.0000015920735,0.0000043238847,0.00021929649,0.00003861341,0.000022600829,0.99738866,0.00063007313,0.0016415467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020982445,0.0000019736274,0.00008494475,0.000030817457,0.0000015147878,0.000017841643,0.00016128569,0.00035775,0.00004995912,0.98239934,0.0168899,0.0000025256204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017365159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020761697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012194903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003023862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028296662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040795982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2488997023","doi":"","title":"You gotta believe","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.021422950916222563,"score_gpt":0.23848623432181998,"score_spread":0.2170632834055974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2488997023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011465927,0.0021929056,0.011399903,0.13806854,0.0047445768,0.000049223137,0.00033574004,0.00019218173,0.83155096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65105367,0.0034127862,0.0034570438,0.032173123,0.002523677,0.000085286796,0.0004137533,0.00023714015,0.30664346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798274,0.00075525575,0.00009348376,0.0003903183,0.0005380142,0.00024016506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966427,0.0011296106,0.0003843801,0.00044003545,0.0010236934,0.000379643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022049998,0.00032175175,0.00033108762,0.0006933566,0.0029891063,0.0037384627,0.00070151995,0.0022397044,0.089446716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009763008,0.00024080789,0.0003092074,0.00069272384,0.005120859,0.0059954426,0.0030102849,0.0040383805,0.025449425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007253826,0.000036579557,0.0016840417,0.0001691136,0.00003304908,0.0005959058,0.008990546,0.000071644565,0.0003585985,0.7769244,0.18320058,0.027863022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020824877,0.00004390061,0.0015717254,0.0003319237,0.000042968924,0.0009308204,0.006380138,0.00025342012,0.00065714563,0.22422512,0.7655148,0.000027352517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025094647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002878693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089446716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001458118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010628438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2992291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492220561","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511811654.015","title":"Beyond Belief: Probability, Dynamics, and Intention","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamics (music); Connection (principal bundle); Computer science; Belief revision; Epistemology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045938766061272666,"score_gpt":0.20224254315101783,"score_spread":0.15630377708974516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492220561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03374287,0.013803895,0.37082368,0.027375773,0.0007148169,0.00007572972,0.00026189178,0.00019230343,0.55300903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9215554,0.00559575,0.032342322,0.0014424473,0.0005246101,0.00015190124,0.00011179685,0.00011672981,0.03815902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830663,0.00091826014,0.000056775018,0.0002236112,0.0003499244,0.0001447825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997081,0.002101418,0.00016058363,0.00025508596,0.00025740065,0.00014444956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026076946,0.0005680927,0.00049694005,0.001031537,0.0012852895,0.005685586,0.00095506565,0.0019062544,0.0070751086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054234597,0.00032336495,0.0006879,0.0011963447,0.010562347,0.013307668,0.0017229608,0.0034829276,0.0009942316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029361777,0.0000029271725,0.000051948697,0.000011056477,0.00000220354,0.000012988623,0.00031263023,0.0003778811,0.00003058074,0.9969668,0.0003211444,0.001906946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002544446,0.0000045747474,0.000067403496,0.000021321399,0.0000021919714,0.000015411279,0.00013141529,0.0013240798,0.00003732773,0.99088377,0.0075057885,0.0000041020758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037776865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021116633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070751086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002817445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013876851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023668587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496029585","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4670","title":"Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are still Weak: A Reply to Seidel","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Epistemology; Philosophy; Medicine; Intensive care medicine","score_opus":0.08802790957842942,"score_gpt":0.28870144220549887,"score_spread":0.20067353262706944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496029585","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036460338,0.0021337345,0.00665453,0.9748532,0.0032963853,0.0000070578253,0.000019348965,0.0000365671,0.009353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28108272,0.004628206,0.00986976,0.68068266,0.014899556,0.00011973736,0.000059257676,0.00022333156,0.008434709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9598718,0.021361576,0.0025928388,0.004407788,0.010238938,0.0015270347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.606111,0.3286809,0.010172464,0.010579464,0.04106905,0.0033870158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06729632,0.0009355708,0.001676964,0.0033929937,0.0061102267,0.011031431,0.004372432,0.03244431,0.0038432518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2707306,0.0007909566,0.0011730286,0.002857534,0.038422037,0.022514531,0.008868114,0.037299216,0.0021441195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008400249,0.000030238529,0.0009075721,0.00026099716,0.0000843442,0.00044429873,0.014952177,0.00041779326,0.0002634494,0.78260046,0.18366514,0.016289541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068045134,0.000037351358,0.00052817096,0.00081530714,0.00005243929,0.00029776926,0.0062269787,0.0011333387,0.00079030945,0.8262174,0.16371024,0.00012269894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003216249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023845227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06729632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059472765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005515969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35590118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496468702","doi":"10.1007/s11098-016-0731-2","title":"Everybody needs to know?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of language; Conceptual framework; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17060004977510965,"score_gpt":0.3346420372139278,"score_spread":0.16404198743881818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496468702","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015117252,0.02389208,0.0058648004,0.745932,0.003001804,0.00002091017,0.00006183078,0.000032750977,0.20607659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77039236,0.023720277,0.0065879556,0.15294138,0.0033804073,0.00012844738,0.00012672738,0.00011095976,0.042611606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901239,0.007096701,0.00024930955,0.0006748365,0.0010782346,0.00077700993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97896135,0.014655835,0.0012293173,0.0013494778,0.001867948,0.0019361384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011259935,0.00047219073,0.0010855834,0.0016817021,0.0100020245,0.010198927,0.0017744893,0.007420666,0.012825578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021058358,0.00042637854,0.00048664742,0.0014610216,0.06589404,0.033578023,0.005911512,0.0115165,0.0024673233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002550288,0.000055882778,0.00055781135,0.00018646878,0.00001438222,0.00014112687,0.021646421,0.000033634024,0.0000787507,0.94607717,0.018933363,0.012249546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013884531,0.000015331181,0.00036275858,0.00064102793,0.000013215912,0.00024199339,0.04249345,0.000073568684,0.00011942607,0.8163343,0.139675,0.000015902548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041009006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040950216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012825578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047342815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008536377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059548914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498487844","doi":"10.5840/cpsem200127","title":"On Belief Limitations in the Normative and Natural Sciences","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Semiotics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Psychology; Natural science; Sociology; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.1363830830337813,"score_gpt":0.2829735806283707,"score_spread":0.1465904975945894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498487844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032300655,0.03921761,0.21319242,0.07620456,0.0011250183,0.000078587975,0.00017214208,0.00010799429,0.6376011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92799264,0.012193415,0.03299123,0.00368082,0.0015673022,0.00034823272,0.00013410379,0.00011564416,0.020976612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99002355,0.0069176825,0.00040846627,0.0005698465,0.0017201944,0.0003603712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95401675,0.0412161,0.00089337747,0.0019819923,0.0015791969,0.00031268084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013488565,0.0007735555,0.0013333242,0.0025232008,0.0031108812,0.009393926,0.0024426593,0.005338005,0.005468115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028947566,0.0007507592,0.00065366254,0.0024198869,0.043525796,0.022634886,0.0038479122,0.0073080584,0.0005894973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027253718,0.0000033070821,0.000018649296,0.000013946166,0.0000012106481,0.00001086258,0.0004409662,0.00012570262,0.000014023053,0.9974119,0.00035969712,0.0015969914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015601765,0.0000011032469,0.000015668067,0.000023341252,6.4383806e-7,0.000009739867,0.0001285944,0.00017310424,0.000018400851,0.9976708,0.0019556175,0.0000014869515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023817013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021443355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013488565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004871519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027892457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0713352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498910725","doi":"10.1163/18758185-01302002","title":"Defending Shah’s Evidentialism from his Pragmatist Critics: the Carnapian Link","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Pragmatism","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Pragmatism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Opposition (politics); Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09576828534889088,"score_gpt":0.27423479391983446,"score_spread":0.1784665085709436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498910725","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03466324,0.0076610297,0.14486526,0.62705344,0.0023945468,0.00008098021,0.00008844193,0.00022128868,0.18297178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9159538,0.0016986661,0.029400572,0.03644998,0.002184175,0.00018337941,0.00002698225,0.00017892929,0.013923576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98637784,0.0067991707,0.000656656,0.0019133934,0.0036556048,0.00059728464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96569455,0.02519771,0.0018821033,0.0029956757,0.0033745235,0.00085545296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020256773,0.00078421185,0.0011746729,0.0020166575,0.0056662373,0.008222916,0.002468799,0.009456131,0.002643919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040945552,0.0006610617,0.000961566,0.0014035131,0.05345873,0.010690348,0.007189229,0.019229874,0.0007781294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009459161,0.000005126325,0.00007831693,0.000028220482,0.000007988608,0.000045230237,0.002123218,0.0001345256,0.000050110735,0.99274844,0.0028398535,0.0019295713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012253992,0.00000830058,0.00009138204,0.00006187631,0.000007886679,0.00006490688,0.0005805271,0.00073052914,0.00015478898,0.9746216,0.023646228,0.00001976705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035980174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039075804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020256773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050700135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042215027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107129335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2499506438","doi":"10.7767/boehlau.9783205793656.ack","title":"Acknowledgements And Dedication","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Böhlau Verlag eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Science and Engineering Research Board; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Download; Cover (algebra); Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.05836819594992175,"score_gpt":0.24769153338881605,"score_spread":0.1893233374388943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2499506438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065104417,0.0092834635,0.01720951,0.32045308,0.18990079,0.0010179038,0.022767263,0.0030435051,0.429814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058373462,0.0045402907,0.01129134,0.05104254,0.028019782,0.0015289382,0.00925715,0.0037768173,0.83216965],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99051803,0.0026184558,0.00037639996,0.0009862108,0.004907931,0.0005929243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93211085,0.009571353,0.0015334265,0.0043167393,0.041234545,0.011233112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007057891,0.0008756921,0.0014434885,0.0021908632,0.0029603816,0.008097077,0.0020330476,0.0013706883,0.23783743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07055133,0.00026148485,0.00046699206,0.0012269557,0.0016618875,0.0034896338,0.0061002006,0.0048546935,0.1444459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000490772,0.00002736809,0.00033771063,0.00020092599,0.0000060425164,0.00013253055,0.0024029375,0.000072068804,0.00047891043,0.034951523,0.92429626,0.037044592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000680006,0.000005946715,0.00028554106,0.00032312932,0.0000032505172,0.00013446853,0.0015437867,0.00006817497,0.000109275345,0.0051968247,0.99231213,0.000010557178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003312898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047700787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23783743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003225733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007463783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7956455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2499849929","doi":"10.1017/s0034412516000202","title":"Indirect epistemic reasons and religious belief","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religious Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Absurdity; Epistemology; Normative; Philosophy; Religious belief; Psychology","score_opus":0.060558183299239544,"score_gpt":0.2878282442080933,"score_spread":0.22727006090885374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2499849929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3274288,0.0021828425,0.11555132,0.03329246,0.00031830065,0.00012969447,0.00018282111,0.00010991168,0.52080375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99399537,0.00012300344,0.0034348886,0.00033605137,0.000050073344,0.000021581076,0.00001884875,0.000010927083,0.0020092798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554056,0.0026734357,0.00021787111,0.00042671335,0.00083097065,0.00031042815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96922094,0.021934569,0.0031336923,0.002704002,0.002253409,0.00075348245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064200494,0.00031911477,0.00032856077,0.0011547573,0.0015917683,0.003968917,0.0009203939,0.0029722604,0.012160154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028473966,0.0002607723,0.0005269063,0.0006681249,0.016011791,0.004830556,0.0039924732,0.0043383883,0.00052867614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024209163,0.000028596945,0.0021566479,0.00007195712,0.000026558964,0.00015162608,0.0022814537,0.00039324106,0.0003274739,0.98915976,0.0003696577,0.005008743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025183914,0.000028493114,0.002835146,0.00013042528,0.000029711366,0.000158495,0.0013853743,0.0015112417,0.00049955474,0.98624516,0.0071338876,0.000017354849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057147606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083608995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012160154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015426517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009305399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040679753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503233496","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3642831","title":"Knowledge as Achievement, More or Less","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.08266020930281968,"score_gpt":0.30467414050248043,"score_spread":0.22201393119966073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503233496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14516738,0.005825078,0.023164816,0.039427917,0.0006312142,0.00006181621,0.0003272517,0.00012293468,0.78527164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850129,0.00087445363,0.001765357,0.00057034177,0.0002537068,0.000033403983,0.00010314165,0.000022455568,0.011364165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961892,0.001390983,0.0002191901,0.00054181664,0.001058214,0.00060055027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99279046,0.0023748518,0.001222813,0.0012248041,0.001163727,0.0012233822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003793812,0.0003957898,0.00057368254,0.00222308,0.0017662856,0.011401784,0.0010665805,0.0023763133,0.0068581738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007322629,0.00014845621,0.0004091893,0.002540114,0.020207098,0.011204209,0.005097281,0.0030687572,0.00096452236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000389824,0.00006937704,0.0025518665,0.00010985279,0.000026152711,0.000052264015,0.0032804164,0.00039559358,0.0001818014,0.97535396,0.0012437325,0.016695848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016216105,0.00006189223,0.0035740782,0.00010953092,0.000035089408,0.000104017454,0.0031634502,0.0005363487,0.00028086777,0.97233945,0.019758053,0.00002101007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020133436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001450635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011401784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00220098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031733885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022942841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503619367","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.016","title":"Categorically different: unintended consequences of trust taxonomy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Unintended consequences; Taxonomy (biology); Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.08375159263136771,"score_gpt":0.2060125634055777,"score_spread":0.12226097077420998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503619367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11308575,0.0030773126,0.38088763,0.11391761,0.0017328307,0.00028502833,0.001506591,0.00035289823,0.38515437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946722,0.00057918095,0.039537057,0.0039268066,0.0004380109,0.0003475623,0.00043444254,0.00019856701,0.007816462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9648963,0.01982953,0.0021824755,0.0041044196,0.007150955,0.0018362649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89130986,0.06735046,0.0051124627,0.023536805,0.010263453,0.002427041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02523233,0.0006188172,0.0020383932,0.0024337266,0.008653254,0.011327774,0.003809592,0.0071610427,0.012409506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1231509,0.0011966337,0.0011604804,0.003197207,0.040555023,0.040549066,0.010267817,0.01748784,0.0012858621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012368787,0.000007945141,0.00018995648,0.000012498986,0.0000043800483,0.000019861405,0.0007502811,0.000079665486,0.000022782617,0.9964012,0.00078307744,0.0017159919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046932855,0.0000018676759,0.00007293975,0.000014185112,0.000003495656,0.000021311362,0.00032602463,0.0004307196,0.000036634843,0.9973858,0.0016968924,0.0000054456104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055342643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063199885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02523233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006653238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004772465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13344294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2506174737","doi":"10.11647/obp.0083","title":"Knowledge and the Norm of Assertion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; National Endowment for the Humanities","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05981341063276695,"score_gpt":0.27961574667822997,"score_spread":0.219802336045463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2506174737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006209216,0.0078692455,0.013912978,0.017093781,0.0013326355,0.000027100494,0.000052212014,0.00008090859,0.9534219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7272843,0.010632958,0.011069414,0.008101215,0.0032055194,0.00025435846,0.00020410499,0.00025270364,0.23899546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950244,0.002314145,0.00022015783,0.00056417024,0.0016236572,0.0002535524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941711,0.0035594702,0.00035666264,0.0006556443,0.0010643953,0.00019274435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004122725,0.0002880248,0.00039245703,0.0009477973,0.0030693058,0.008936291,0.00076525327,0.0017515412,0.0033815617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011131478,0.00025954994,0.000278704,0.0008906085,0.022116559,0.00958649,0.0027830747,0.0037755428,0.001369947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004445907,0.000002405697,0.000037207734,0.000013596901,0.0000010051838,0.000011822378,0.0015082319,0.00005979323,0.000035827743,0.98785293,0.0042416756,0.0062312335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045285683,0.000009117772,0.00015288519,0.00009914918,0.000003242505,0.000039092854,0.00069946464,0.0003074271,0.000120437086,0.8538756,0.14468119,0.000007791231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023922327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016874317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008936291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038560778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038598182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027977943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510917024","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4621","title":"The Real Struggle: An Objective Notion of Expertise?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06397860815651764,"score_gpt":0.27931182389956416,"score_spread":0.21533321574304654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510917024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030121816,0.01466272,0.1648334,0.36887154,0.0021571042,0.00006289195,0.0001405213,0.00020449392,0.4189456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492812,0.001953322,0.010458516,0.017318137,0.0021414557,0.00012432628,0.00005483914,0.00016781095,0.01850033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98590475,0.008969353,0.00047931416,0.0020006502,0.0017293356,0.0009166687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830132,0.012281314,0.0015221022,0.0014077018,0.0010978791,0.00067773904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0099561075,0.0007101335,0.00073397736,0.0025400708,0.00535211,0.010812036,0.002592123,0.008954477,0.011042419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024841255,0.00044667968,0.0007275077,0.001899709,0.049713075,0.028605606,0.008737282,0.0077228295,0.0017416849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006141083,0.0000030142016,0.00009054238,0.000026092423,0.000002720628,0.000022928989,0.002955004,0.00004430372,0.000024183082,0.9935416,0.0017929332,0.0014905459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010208585,0.000013017242,0.00019909543,0.00012785492,0.000006486261,0.00009421039,0.0024045012,0.00036524353,0.00010804169,0.951119,0.045539007,0.000013294013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012828129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011951585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011042419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049602347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002128751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05265355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511031155","doi":"","title":"Intentionality and the Aristotelian-Thomistic view of concepts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of mind and behavior","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Intentionality; Object (grammar); Essentialism; Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive science; Pessimism; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.053368738640769235,"score_gpt":0.2981929682930619,"score_spread":0.24482422965229267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511031155","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04669606,0.017931726,0.1699838,0.03166943,0.0010090193,0.000104956576,0.00017664791,0.00022165678,0.7322067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94186443,0.0035307284,0.036421284,0.002065498,0.0006447566,0.00015127259,0.00008644236,0.000059748014,0.015175811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705136,0.0012651216,0.00014065395,0.00045160935,0.0007986674,0.00029260223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979381,0.0009475528,0.00022110912,0.00030852368,0.00035838044,0.00022618014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031140137,0.0005240948,0.0007279394,0.0033238255,0.0035505688,0.0059731943,0.0012198375,0.002857481,0.0028771383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030912107,0.00042375972,0.00086749025,0.0014222187,0.03314418,0.008696626,0.004334761,0.003523467,0.00072099676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030673802,0.0000029758266,0.000051507268,0.000013424165,0.000002328809,0.00001547932,0.00056751276,0.0000664835,0.000023405506,0.9975714,0.00034153525,0.0013408805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045920056,0.0000047851963,0.0001005541,0.000017558812,0.0000021156177,0.00004421801,0.00015300827,0.00018618554,0.000022513494,0.9900566,0.0094035715,0.0000042615816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028074125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020926401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059731943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040502353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018672255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0293867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521535665","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4720","title":"An Epistemological Theory of Argumentation for Adversarial Legal Proceedings","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Adversarial system; Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06811105210042746,"score_gpt":0.28864140674621463,"score_spread":0.22053035464578719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521535665","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010085843,0.0029416252,0.57955843,0.03347534,0.00079306564,0.00017711632,0.00019816084,0.00020252392,0.37256792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8249097,0.001999071,0.13436924,0.0031496764,0.0016267878,0.00085827213,0.0002244125,0.00016765903,0.03269521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905191,0.0060448498,0.00045563086,0.0007016952,0.0017362486,0.0005425285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883543,0.008514321,0.000700388,0.0010996625,0.0009507207,0.00038049903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011475276,0.0009631031,0.0009749913,0.0038968914,0.005826328,0.012308331,0.0033722923,0.008499248,0.0094234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015907764,0.0006572251,0.0021887773,0.0024777905,0.025145072,0.016945276,0.0050753276,0.006557698,0.0014695801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.9260334e-7,0.000002446693,0.000007909788,0.000007868709,0.0000012801349,0.000010643682,0.00013904962,0.00018927724,0.0000072514003,0.9990777,0.00019208217,0.00036352407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005194783,0.0000021249257,0.000011481588,0.000018365155,0.0000017088333,0.000016950557,0.00006921894,0.0012042596,0.00001708593,0.994865,0.0037857986,0.0000028843124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015213737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012034929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012308331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064138444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038535786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06068778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522061514","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4725","title":"Errors of Reasoning, Naturalizing the Logic of Inference","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology","score_opus":0.08521820864784566,"score_gpt":0.2969468926641764,"score_spread":0.21172868401633074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522061514","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06628631,0.0048455093,0.72348493,0.089729525,0.0015844848,0.0002704526,0.0003443662,0.0004017576,0.113052614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.914293,0.0012244208,0.07549269,0.0027140402,0.00094366376,0.00026686306,0.00013788344,0.00019372236,0.004733796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96139634,0.028608976,0.0016046682,0.0032020647,0.0041404217,0.0010476237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79287374,0.17968772,0.005404299,0.013416855,0.007308886,0.0013085129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04240375,0.001311674,0.0013218682,0.0050659697,0.0051622917,0.01362666,0.004673347,0.0055647874,0.005538888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15149811,0.0010688774,0.0012051006,0.0020100265,0.06906512,0.030105362,0.0063765487,0.008987666,0.0004928328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029901086,0.000011638948,0.00022270529,0.00006515301,0.000013832445,0.000049508402,0.0024294301,0.0010302758,0.000067423825,0.99283147,0.0009742956,0.0022743652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009682415,0.0000023268374,0.000038445123,0.000026369755,0.000005182411,0.000015978669,0.0004230983,0.0011873042,0.00013536762,0.99597245,0.0021791202,0.000004557847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046462673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002678219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04240375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068872604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070855613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22425508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524483968","doi":"10.1002/tht3.213","title":"Actionability Judgments Cause Knowledge Judgments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12007274588769724,"score_gpt":0.313337800412243,"score_spread":0.1932650545245458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524483968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69498324,0.0021000376,0.105506964,0.0067199124,0.00067016593,0.00073581113,0.001102129,0.001066509,0.18711534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846628,0.00029706402,0.011224955,0.0008508353,0.00011115058,0.00011358056,0.00036705745,0.0001642143,0.0022084021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783245,0.008228447,0.0011417755,0.0060863975,0.0053023817,0.0009165836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72749627,0.21827029,0.026769714,0.0154616805,0.00954793,0.0024540904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013915315,0.00091633765,0.00071844284,0.0019270318,0.0012934492,0.002580963,0.00096918806,0.002363567,0.015554919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19718058,0.0011619875,0.0013500821,0.00081806805,0.0041012303,0.009052111,0.003385905,0.0037698292,0.00068613776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005218427,0.003120364,0.23620366,0.0059129284,0.0024559272,0.0019625938,0.0387899,0.0181901,0.06467157,0.38683453,0.008992507,0.22764754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084008666,0.0011879127,0.3453941,0.00057718623,0.0011751456,0.0011771063,0.0045137145,0.018997842,0.03587062,0.56555074,0.024280349,0.00043511254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006292442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049696225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015554919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020386474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017009451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07359213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528290432","doi":"","title":"Carbon-Based Brain, Consciousness and Cognition: Understanding Cognitive States in the Context of the Kk Thesis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal Of Applied Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Burman University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Cognition; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Consciousness; Need to know; Existentialism; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.14862527863792874,"score_gpt":0.3311644760961682,"score_spread":0.1825391974582395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528290432","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24866655,0.01331684,0.3462127,0.04549508,0.0008381383,0.00008610172,0.00020804061,0.00022801338,0.34494856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97445405,0.0018913347,0.019007599,0.0010092843,0.00028270803,0.00006690983,0.000043905744,0.00003896936,0.0032051704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936324,0.00027766704,0.000029535313,0.00011559187,0.00012509468,0.00008891334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983071,0.0009685173,0.0001963599,0.00024830035,0.00016523954,0.00011452174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001748564,0.0003359085,0.0004599635,0.0011678064,0.00091749744,0.004188526,0.00090528297,0.0020861954,0.00283901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038133182,0.00027830733,0.00061072997,0.00077243143,0.011930492,0.012078876,0.0024660209,0.0028825663,0.00040577332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015165385,0.000009311242,0.00047726126,0.000047304973,0.000007911345,0.000064861546,0.0014048667,0.0008363077,0.0004605557,0.9920908,0.00031799622,0.0042677345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027431436,0.000010372774,0.00074139365,0.000024994586,0.000004241182,0.00005267353,0.00039778673,0.0018697189,0.00014626025,0.993936,0.0028050998,0.000008690307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010927073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000648224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004188526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001282389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007921204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009497404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557832967","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2016.2.6","title":"Responsibilism and the Analytic-Sociological Debate in Social Epistemology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Artificiality; Social epistemology; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Sociological theory; Philosophy of science; Code (set theory); Social science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.061726967857170995,"score_gpt":0.2803678219097562,"score_spread":0.21864085405258518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557832967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061193828,0.030502914,0.11299263,0.38130915,0.0032919399,0.00009840461,0.000060761227,0.00016471297,0.41038567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97668266,0.003651805,0.0072438293,0.0061081033,0.00095178885,0.00013988196,0.000019298306,0.00010227377,0.005100319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.939175,0.051536825,0.00093445845,0.0019444886,0.0050132764,0.0013959588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94150275,0.049377404,0.001886735,0.002718985,0.0029327662,0.0015814132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04146172,0.0009001254,0.0010063138,0.0043387217,0.013298868,0.018031806,0.0019029984,0.006504479,0.0025170387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0419468,0.0005761558,0.00073958,0.0024635778,0.13423948,0.017904637,0.010544587,0.008574895,0.00043683505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003351426,0.000005549093,0.00005300562,0.000022511216,0.0000018743528,0.000016748645,0.0059449486,0.000047574962,0.000016021833,0.9915249,0.0006961049,0.0016672933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071537665,0.0000066950483,0.000069392285,0.000119274366,0.0000023278765,0.000037056117,0.005486404,0.00022262952,0.00009361176,0.9637144,0.030234007,0.00000697663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031919337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026092725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04146172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013196332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0093215555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21927315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563658370","doi":"10.1017/epi.2016.20","title":"DISAGREEMENT, DRUGS, ETC.: FROM ACCURACY TO AKRASIA","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Epistemology; Subject (documents); Psychology; Subject matter; Reliability (semiconductor); Philosophy; Computer science; Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.06129047173476556,"score_gpt":0.28407845940926113,"score_spread":0.22278798767449556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563658370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45624802,0.008188661,0.20784613,0.1531487,0.0012702188,0.00020251179,0.0007511342,0.0003567331,0.17198788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99254286,0.0004175486,0.005156898,0.0010804916,0.00020352528,0.000025759788,0.00003341238,0.000019746625,0.00051982456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9131519,0.060576055,0.0062516937,0.0066050817,0.0114338985,0.001981347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4120837,0.50392425,0.03544711,0.03105305,0.015555759,0.0019362197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060989294,0.0005101142,0.0016587898,0.0047532055,0.0031382993,0.00859828,0.0021346025,0.0052543706,0.008039224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39600852,0.0006792238,0.00093780196,0.0034410704,0.033072498,0.027365312,0.007374568,0.006505092,0.0005600015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006149686,0.000104155,0.018966623,0.00082658266,0.0001900288,0.0004828482,0.01776517,0.0024533041,0.00032124677,0.91132677,0.002912247,0.044035994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006073045,0.000050680963,0.0052795922,0.00037509997,0.00006917898,0.000344067,0.003491558,0.0056886305,0.00054607494,0.9791996,0.004816333,0.00007845984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034508677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016795204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060989294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041911285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024464512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32254606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563753395","doi":"10.1017/s0012217316000718","title":"Le problème de la justification des lois logiques de base","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.049984357660904366,"score_gpt":0.27704693049569956,"score_spread":0.2270625728347952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563753395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023861393,0.010684248,0.27290642,0.12268385,0.0018060723,0.0001336454,0.0002690615,0.00025559912,0.5673997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8858228,0.0063231257,0.059895333,0.008162328,0.0029977255,0.00039261478,0.00017242535,0.00038461428,0.035849083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98300743,0.008142289,0.00072462193,0.0014181896,0.0057591386,0.00094826036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689679,0.021796698,0.0016378706,0.0031982616,0.0037399025,0.000659494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01668796,0.00078876776,0.0018249758,0.0043678014,0.007492585,0.01245879,0.0033756162,0.008714634,0.011163468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043492105,0.00082669663,0.0011562735,0.003437186,0.042193547,0.019496579,0.0079623675,0.012225251,0.00209097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043578784,0.000003496935,0.00003758717,0.000024232415,0.000003195979,0.00002007963,0.0004922736,0.00006946714,0.000025313047,0.9972095,0.000546989,0.0015635153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008614484,0.0000062178706,0.000069098656,0.000090267524,0.00000447695,0.000043873635,0.00042937242,0.00030455005,0.00012010449,0.9812494,0.017665932,0.000008210806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044605467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055269157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01668796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006767408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078053577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088255405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2570406893","doi":"","title":"Emma Lazarus: Spinster-Versifier Well Worth Knowing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Women in Judaism A Multidisciplinary e-Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.043033823681805895,"score_gpt":0.2687350463197094,"score_spread":0.22570122263790351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2570406893","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027732862,0.018784558,0.005955185,0.51620376,0.013288105,0.00003573422,0.00006685378,0.00019826397,0.41773462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7032466,0.0040304367,0.0022388645,0.06667491,0.004316131,0.000042543063,0.00003678882,0.0004122277,0.21900147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960842,0.0024575207,0.00012204707,0.00043739635,0.000451882,0.00044682575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954716,0.0025302249,0.00027133548,0.00044465478,0.0005492377,0.0007330635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00435338,0.00037928493,0.0004955735,0.0008164432,0.009634972,0.009286846,0.0006867429,0.004699193,0.014148761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01175336,0.00024782785,0.00023392339,0.0005377101,0.029320221,0.010345376,0.004750736,0.008577806,0.00288563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030482042,0.000019683988,0.00027108873,0.00003921878,0.0000057351454,0.0001383712,0.02490069,0.000040039544,0.00016972584,0.89212996,0.07312449,0.009130575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018438033,0.000024919478,0.00025896681,0.00022359107,0.000008099056,0.00019641142,0.022577172,0.00015137531,0.0003651749,0.29492122,0.6812306,0.000024017247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003190329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006591448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014148761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003150581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003088953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047332346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573666881","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i4.4347","title":"Clarifying our Ideas in Persuasion Dialogue","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Epistemology; Accidental; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10135079636543842,"score_gpt":0.2871500701404811,"score_spread":0.18579927377504268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2573666881","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054588906,0.010343821,0.5152632,0.19496317,0.0048350217,0.00054255483,0.00012470206,0.0005469885,0.21879162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8652682,0.0018070559,0.11007389,0.008630142,0.000946431,0.0008245834,0.00008696808,0.00028284354,0.012079925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9130316,0.072327904,0.0025751516,0.004189957,0.005458109,0.0024172678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94581985,0.041967217,0.0030394092,0.0041236267,0.0038114663,0.0012384834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05707463,0.0019180924,0.0014664507,0.0042689294,0.010960952,0.020723287,0.0040851976,0.016545959,0.00614788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057378028,0.0011453987,0.001772168,0.0028546127,0.06863461,0.04271672,0.013185909,0.02019814,0.0014770734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002314006,0.000012626203,0.000061065846,0.000088825545,0.0000057545312,0.000105789804,0.049486283,0.00015904363,0.0002128383,0.9465014,0.00062059483,0.0027225823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003736565,0.000031356143,0.00009734532,0.00023959363,0.000011566412,0.00015902157,0.01675729,0.0009297996,0.000673462,0.920939,0.060091212,0.000032957618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013811041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005696798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05707463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067857467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040439367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30184305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580904948","doi":"10.7202/1073415ar","title":"One More Span in the Bridge: A Rejoinder to Michael Apple, Ulf Lundgren, and John White","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Bridge (graph theory); Span (engineering); Life span; Art; Sociology; Gerontology; Engineering; Medicine; Genetics; Biology","score_opus":0.10731138039702964,"score_gpt":0.2742381731235564,"score_spread":0.16692679272652677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580904948","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002291132,0.0027377047,0.00051705464,0.98664504,0.007536063,0.0000072441535,0.000008287692,0.000009271141,0.0023102493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009448803,0.002084956,0.0014189549,0.9592469,0.015720585,0.00008408774,0.00001006995,0.00011952098,0.011866247],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986158,0.006415204,0.0008212635,0.0023303854,0.0031386288,0.0011365485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93948656,0.042743213,0.001091852,0.0016651945,0.00886761,0.0061456454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024247,0.001168405,0.00306168,0.002103247,0.021362362,0.017817527,0.006183061,0.059615795,0.008437249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06555538,0.0012143481,0.0014334188,0.0015690139,0.032736793,0.032308683,0.012636812,0.11438219,0.0031580778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004156123,0.00004627514,0.00015662907,0.000075669464,0.000025725458,0.00021903079,0.00786632,0.000061407234,0.00009976336,0.1544037,0.82900697,0.007997004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005000823,0.000025477626,0.00019784091,0.00073464244,0.000024548604,0.0001596757,0.014005354,0.00021619005,0.00014216418,0.1391568,0.8451814,0.00010589348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034709692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062358506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059615795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005701883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015645117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12823194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586999247","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1286886","title":"Critical Notice of <i>Beyond the Analytic-Continental Divide: Pluralist Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century</i>. Edited by Jeffrey A. Bell, Andrew Cutrofello, and Paul M. Livingston (New York: Routledge, 2016. 334 + viii pp)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Analytic philosophy; Notice; Political philosophy; Continental philosophy; Ontology; Personhood; Meaning (existential); Politics; Agency (philosophy); Contemporary philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.040745096591124866,"score_gpt":0.25842399026233626,"score_spread":0.2176788936712114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586999247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056161573,0.19793986,0.002735796,0.71550524,0.018958334,0.000033709897,0.00008069836,0.000041713673,0.059088487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4860776,0.1970571,0.0061497604,0.1569053,0.043867614,0.00040085646,0.00019493917,0.00041911192,0.10892776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952389,0.0034028725,0.000103271945,0.00027871013,0.0006664296,0.0003099212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889753,0.0086972015,0.00036166306,0.00035916732,0.00096909906,0.00063758076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009094916,0.0007145781,0.000684336,0.0025019716,0.0097731,0.014658041,0.0016719478,0.0052036997,0.004181398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007953533,0.00036013295,0.000468861,0.0028756121,0.034219984,0.013216116,0.005479849,0.009614527,0.0005074363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000214532,0.000020083098,0.00019317752,0.00027517977,0.000006587252,0.00017042753,0.04611197,0.000112232345,0.0001112531,0.5944273,0.3428351,0.015715232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007972499,0.000010527703,0.00046499894,0.0013757114,0.000003794545,0.0001360582,0.034258425,0.000104743514,0.000118781,0.13723499,0.826261,0.00002310942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02118381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0463966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02118381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014693447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00960165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10660893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588495035","doi":"10.1163/18756735-000013","title":"Re-Thinking Gareth Evans’ Approach to Indexical Sense and the Problem of Tracking Thoughts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Grazer Philosophische Studien","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Indexicality; Cognition; Dynamics (music); Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13208561421437512,"score_gpt":0.30685258832020335,"score_spread":0.17476697410582823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588495035","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043900434,0.012490833,0.21009251,0.41517067,0.002567313,0.000043288735,0.00013505321,0.00030212398,0.31529784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91401446,0.0029049946,0.03296092,0.0152182905,0.0015822533,0.0001324294,0.000045292967,0.00019268914,0.032948636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969318,0.0016761885,0.000104612125,0.00057009596,0.0005574806,0.00015977555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941186,0.0040722447,0.0003465837,0.00066208636,0.0005728681,0.00022765233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00394685,0.0006010377,0.00043131952,0.0019882955,0.0031452405,0.0067887395,0.0019911486,0.0050280895,0.00426632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008373197,0.0003410581,0.0004965092,0.0010634687,0.037799638,0.023673385,0.0043132887,0.006144078,0.0006396284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066847306,0.0000037583864,0.000046400648,0.000014687857,0.000002192448,0.0000353424,0.0051200995,0.00007254548,0.000059045982,0.98990715,0.0020781006,0.0026540214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005058764,0.000004157061,0.000046259527,0.000033483506,0.0000023877892,0.000059676175,0.0016793348,0.0003066865,0.0001317138,0.97201127,0.025711747,0.00000822628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003061236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00267119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067887395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003391841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015203115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024609685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588631651","doi":"10.3721/037.002.sp1002","title":"Dedication and General Acknowledgments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the North Atlantic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.05799260578682626,"score_gpt":0.27870683353761344,"score_spread":0.2207142277507872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588631651","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005784447,0.0074870554,0.014394749,0.47330302,0.23842582,0.0011553139,0.033362962,0.0034128206,0.22267385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.080492795,0.005617132,0.01439032,0.12010655,0.07224175,0.0026273716,0.01570623,0.0035828103,0.6852351],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99176735,0.0025231822,0.00048205722,0.0009111579,0.0036677737,0.0006485042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8833611,0.01940073,0.0041793366,0.006385339,0.06744456,0.0192289],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009241938,0.001030807,0.0016840902,0.0023348792,0.0028357396,0.0064664637,0.0022643048,0.0017713256,0.1703562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095553026,0.00033362146,0.0005191386,0.0015354552,0.0012703363,0.0031495374,0.004561552,0.0065259235,0.091287576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037168327,0.00001771656,0.00045696364,0.00014928269,0.0000056836525,0.000049198028,0.00083513826,0.000050220548,0.00021018452,0.013831109,0.9694429,0.014914409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015201347,0.000011654155,0.0011088331,0.00044548497,0.000007376826,0.00017101728,0.0017773643,0.00015259162,0.00013475104,0.006463981,0.98969114,0.000020571206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005997515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007356791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8296438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034839541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008610816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56989825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589461463","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-43355-4_1","title":"The Philosophy of Trust","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Peace psychology book series","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Express trust; Law and economics; Business; Social trust; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Law; Social capital","score_opus":0.06775460382103411,"score_gpt":0.28674898000245735,"score_spread":0.21899437618142326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589461463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024820017,0.019375293,0.014205272,0.038412612,0.0010439008,0.000025962143,0.00006843468,0.000047855086,0.9243385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.562811,0.020053891,0.0042125806,0.008024799,0.0016195171,0.00016092749,0.00009430595,0.0001833209,0.4028396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986111,0.00068428786,0.0000442489,0.00017465699,0.00033680818,0.0001488955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987828,0.00066814915,0.00011018087,0.0001665731,0.0001538221,0.00011854911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015968932,0.00068392226,0.00042282802,0.0008301554,0.0039824457,0.008676962,0.000786813,0.003952611,0.015238694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004353626,0.00038892237,0.0003019365,0.0012063087,0.020490397,0.009226032,0.0023966169,0.0061217686,0.0032934146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020009784,0.000002596142,0.000023930346,0.000009894047,0.0000010140697,0.0000088574125,0.00043806288,0.000056225133,0.00000929333,0.98903185,0.0077243946,0.002691979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033459844,0.0000037927844,0.00007213991,0.00011665192,0.0000021347785,0.00003714553,0.0006517345,0.00017693329,0.00003471307,0.8642059,0.13469145,0.000003993486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061686845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00833995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015238694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058695525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057248264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05097854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597563908","doi":"10.1080/13668790802048357","title":"Exchange","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics Place & Environment","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Obituary; Human rights; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.1447613686544509,"score_gpt":0.26664011353972117,"score_spread":0.12187874488527026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597563908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003785404,0.00024005659,0.0016082728,0.0027530226,0.003344222,0.0001636048,0.008055537,0.0059434413,0.9775134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002500397,0.00024440372,0.0009068788,0.0019416783,0.0006869995,0.00013712866,0.0055773654,0.0033231697,0.98468196],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908197,0.00011795187,0.00005126643,0.00015872552,0.00041138794,0.00017880386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729663,0.00033927243,0.00009630997,0.00067828124,0.00086720317,0.00072241126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008877305,0.00077396963,0.0008961316,0.001715258,0.0018511931,0.0066960566,0.0018054912,0.002219298,0.93390936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005723117,0.00042217574,0.0007461196,0.0017868093,0.00039996332,0.0072474843,0.005049473,0.0019568494,0.8696133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003249381,0.000013682394,0.00006395961,0.0000658864,0.0000018003657,0.00002789045,0.000052610838,0.0000172723,0.0001006081,0.0031071717,0.9571563,0.03936031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005901742,0.000003828656,0.00011276892,0.000025639152,7.6591095e-7,0.000022921084,0.000050424824,0.00002181011,0.000052063147,0.0006880825,0.99901175,0.000004036165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022038186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031970658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93390936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011158687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010536466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600040101","doi":"10.3998/ergo.12405314.0004.005","title":"Objectivism and Perspectivism about the Epistemic Ought","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; Queen's University; University of Birmingham; Queen's University Belfast; University of Southampton","keywords":"Perspectivism; Objectivism; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.22984154815331467,"score_gpt":0.4166930429679461,"score_spread":0.18685149481463145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600040101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022333456,0.026459076,0.05574477,0.13539836,0.0011728598,0.00008045153,0.00012435706,0.00007857274,0.7586081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88154525,0.009788927,0.015640588,0.012431257,0.0012253273,0.00031476945,0.0001298317,0.00021841953,0.078705676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948084,0.0032777195,0.00021975557,0.0007434249,0.00074681663,0.0002040159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933722,0.0049008597,0.00035766303,0.0006445998,0.00043859816,0.00028608553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060481583,0.0008002262,0.000820453,0.0017948005,0.004622929,0.010710913,0.0012785303,0.006450843,0.010681607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008711352,0.00078282866,0.0006843187,0.0016758147,0.049624927,0.016970342,0.0060797976,0.012070099,0.0011998832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049539835,0.0000026981545,0.00004037642,0.000019017256,0.0000021116225,0.00002512896,0.00207406,0.000040572893,0.00002412863,0.99589264,0.0007850753,0.0010891565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005380234,0.0000032692328,0.00010484962,0.000084782456,0.0000022679462,0.00002215216,0.00045021222,0.000104846724,0.00003621171,0.97817147,0.021010317,0.0000041267426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005027338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038676492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010710913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009932873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029911546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07206839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605974930","doi":"10.22329/cjpp.v1i1.8157","title":"Why Practical Ethics Should be Interested in Cognitive Science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Practical Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Cognition; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.51443259865772,"score_gpt":0.4433573921493324,"score_spread":0.07107520650838756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605974930","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00831188,0.005826162,0.01931764,0.8775236,0.0015642211,0.0000718997,0.000024800926,0.0000726201,0.08728725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75540453,0.0041286186,0.026992058,0.19272967,0.0034412208,0.00043334215,0.000046321875,0.00017138598,0.016652793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9488838,0.033283602,0.0013809237,0.00285599,0.009405202,0.0041904757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8954547,0.07578601,0.0044821193,0.005846076,0.01235071,0.006080413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044709977,0.0005219752,0.0010332952,0.0017079414,0.008464804,0.011975036,0.0018840859,0.022127837,0.0054372894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077018,0.0006495868,0.00095354894,0.0013613915,0.08842956,0.022456242,0.006452206,0.016882615,0.001743343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011082669,0.000030812094,0.00030550617,0.00008821842,0.000008515078,0.00007780758,0.0042381813,0.00017038846,0.000085364336,0.97669685,0.013560731,0.004726482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013015961,0.00000676862,0.00019750572,0.0001341941,0.0000025193663,0.00006531191,0.0015518689,0.00019145248,0.000056912577,0.95854384,0.039224673,0.000011947592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005896198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046342053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044709977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008851981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013351404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2364518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607495368","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199688234.003.0009","title":"Epistemic Situationism and Cognitive Ability","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Situationism; Virtue; Epistemic virtue; Epistemology; Experimental philosophy; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Social epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Western philosophy","score_opus":0.07211824943830239,"score_gpt":0.239394380772415,"score_spread":0.16727613133411262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607495368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40702316,0.0014518951,0.048601393,0.01436665,0.0001280248,0.00005726699,0.0001331236,0.00014101987,0.5280974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978853,0.0001068623,0.0011441376,0.00008221305,0.000015847425,0.000009760615,0.000017419688,0.0000058536307,0.0007326364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704176,0.0018911333,0.00014333239,0.0003536529,0.00033430342,0.0002357416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98357856,0.010466649,0.0026906456,0.0011546124,0.0012138977,0.0008956134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035693438,0.00030855363,0.00024662758,0.0014640786,0.0012448954,0.005170549,0.00066538074,0.001204447,0.008643778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014052524,0.00019369827,0.0004932421,0.00090046163,0.013667818,0.006466948,0.0042532072,0.0017988015,0.00041666403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038257225,0.000066533255,0.003878799,0.00008938244,0.000026716609,0.00012618199,0.004395963,0.001465449,0.00019407456,0.9797952,0.0007859252,0.009137491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001646291,0.000020496474,0.003260244,0.000047206468,0.000013985661,0.00012401254,0.001782049,0.002622453,0.0001214153,0.9875808,0.0043955958,0.000015386047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008069544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005235501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008643778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020476582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0289163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26102380","doi":"10.2214/ajr.14.12960","title":"Insensitive Enough Semantics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Principia an international journal of epistemology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Sentence; Linguistics; Semantics (computer science); Truth condition; Point (geometry); Computer science; Slogan; Relevance (law); Ellipsis (linguistics); Philosophy; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.04601516086217675,"score_gpt":0.2965572149190003,"score_spread":0.2505420540568235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26102380","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03276719,0.0017213965,0.723766,0.0085048545,0.0013717731,0.00031102836,0.0034319274,0.004476459,0.2236493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81253564,0.0010879145,0.12725037,0.005543241,0.0012011125,0.00039651437,0.0042578382,0.0036454198,0.044081982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916197,0.0024178142,0.0008568998,0.0028224015,0.0015011147,0.00078204274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902243,0.0035172107,0.00048437045,0.0033869762,0.0020908639,0.00029622656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005348875,0.0015048354,0.0016240684,0.0023737587,0.00299731,0.0067443736,0.0018917631,0.0026351032,0.019000087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020888222,0.0013337827,0.0022979742,0.0015714017,0.00606994,0.019857893,0.007836327,0.004740167,0.006358456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012211464,0.000023327199,0.001367424,0.00021076266,0.000057439902,0.00034895723,0.0012216384,0.0004794039,0.0019410008,0.96413624,0.008414988,0.021676632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018092234,0.000015371998,0.00033957724,0.000049007216,0.000048945796,0.00046293953,0.00040179133,0.0020088474,0.0015752887,0.9500743,0.044975296,0.000030559913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001971068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015912903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019000087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023168086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020194857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06356162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613095313","doi":"10.1163/17455197-01403002","title":"Has Jonathan Bernier Rescued Critical Realism?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster Divinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Realism; Confusion; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.1852723032266653,"score_gpt":0.32305277171882785,"score_spread":0.13778046849216255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613095313","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030090401,0.011838059,0.0016382273,0.95531136,0.0032977774,0.0000059909316,0.000014357046,0.00004174576,0.02484339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41148135,0.01733134,0.004981145,0.505992,0.0153543465,0.00013122954,0.000055248147,0.00048744064,0.044185877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98936206,0.0059601665,0.00025071338,0.0012131091,0.002007879,0.0012060805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793493,0.014306036,0.00090477907,0.00090910937,0.002633154,0.0018976128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013867879,0.0006059969,0.00069953245,0.0015217141,0.010204252,0.013653625,0.0018590754,0.012462205,0.0056238296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03764757,0.0004225951,0.00058066566,0.0012312885,0.028379744,0.012222839,0.0054441215,0.012765002,0.0014218646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003173071,0.000014545928,0.00027541697,0.00009666146,0.0000127534895,0.00018166698,0.007881639,0.0001319415,0.00010364121,0.8181193,0.16637783,0.006772925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031969892,0.000014557479,0.00035531592,0.00039213296,0.0000098975415,0.0001654375,0.008208634,0.00030796853,0.0003406717,0.42853257,0.5615828,0.00005810167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02138194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021685656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02138194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010779289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008335514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07820958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616329343","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v5i5.3206","title":"Ryle on the Explanatory Role of Knowledge How","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Åbo Akademi; Universitetet i Oslo; Université de Montréal","keywords":"Intellectualism; Epistemology; Possession (linguistics); Framing (construction); Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.18700933372943965,"score_gpt":0.30468931881527667,"score_spread":0.11767998508583702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616329343","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044302773,0.0271714,0.07469923,0.42726168,0.0014965074,0.000104839004,0.00024614044,0.00020095702,0.42451644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94716346,0.0063433084,0.010012141,0.0136107085,0.0009315869,0.00016063784,0.00006669098,0.000096915035,0.021614514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960284,0.0029982165,0.00006832837,0.00036888543,0.00028729785,0.0002488522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899601,0.00824648,0.00039166334,0.00054661813,0.0006141753,0.00024100285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004577059,0.000563815,0.0007995097,0.002022238,0.0044969833,0.008016107,0.0012114126,0.00429441,0.0042271493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010134257,0.00031228072,0.0006597762,0.001550841,0.037236426,0.012089474,0.004092273,0.0066325245,0.00082739495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008080546,0.0000029794048,0.000049505485,0.000020536925,0.0000016396317,0.000035282697,0.0020192228,0.00015542445,0.000016781263,0.9944957,0.0021681658,0.0010266715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009508853,0.000006936606,0.00012426017,0.00012689273,0.0000055254422,0.00004266655,0.0015941617,0.0005306099,0.000105309075,0.95751435,0.039931018,0.00000879957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004673209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030529872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008016107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003274372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026584184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024206102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617962162","doi":"","title":"Rationality and Salience","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aporia","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Salience (neuroscience); Salient; Irrational number; Epistemology; Ecological rationality; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2073546961187617,"score_gpt":0.29979701784454765,"score_spread":0.09244232172578595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617962162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19314179,0.0057966555,0.14629896,0.034266178,0.00033466905,0.00012817587,0.00027786198,0.00014085342,0.61961484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98813033,0.00042553313,0.006088889,0.0005177382,0.00009906125,0.00003982383,0.00003515986,0.00002601506,0.004637447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993899,0.0031707303,0.00026808615,0.0010383836,0.001027156,0.00059661455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925115,0.004368764,0.00088817196,0.0011789044,0.00070828333,0.00034440006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058838935,0.0004411213,0.0005662698,0.0012218073,0.002562952,0.0049055293,0.00090037554,0.0025683052,0.004868355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013923438,0.0004491142,0.0007701695,0.0008708203,0.021659005,0.0081308745,0.0048628026,0.002771552,0.00054268725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017702409,0.000007337616,0.000611603,0.00002552813,0.000010804859,0.000039350543,0.0014441026,0.00039923994,0.00017176894,0.9938221,0.00038702492,0.0030634182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012964886,0.000010306652,0.00093284535,0.00002727112,0.0000102808835,0.00004716635,0.00063462585,0.00070761447,0.0001970638,0.9897508,0.007659602,0.000009546578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035040944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023174963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058838935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004242969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002063788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03111732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2725111037","doi":"10.1007/s11406-017-9867-3","title":"Epistemic Uniqueness and the Practical Relevance of Epistemic Practices","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy of language; Relevance (law); Philosophy; Epistemic virtue; Metaphysics; Philosophy of mind; Sociology; Political science; Virtue","score_opus":0.19290650555385228,"score_gpt":0.37254892096295555,"score_spread":0.17964241540910328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2725111037","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09529279,0.011517853,0.23407428,0.08570399,0.0010823024,0.00016594701,0.00022697737,0.00017157907,0.5717643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97864294,0.0010148243,0.014309978,0.00096867443,0.00046617113,0.00015147777,0.00004481228,0.000047898535,0.004353117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678592,0.02275712,0.0013609921,0.0033547282,0.003248963,0.001419004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9131408,0.06604071,0.0038074153,0.010765235,0.004623685,0.0016221053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026946777,0.0008129958,0.0017029236,0.004467481,0.00964352,0.01534751,0.0028591186,0.010005986,0.008698025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07508141,0.0012831667,0.0014560734,0.0027888466,0.07799356,0.03304418,0.01159093,0.008427462,0.0008606731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009672045,0.0000072608336,0.00013303115,0.00003019145,0.0000059035115,0.000023278406,0.0009880932,0.00011990738,0.000021915828,0.9968651,0.00017673703,0.0016189335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075975,0.000003866733,0.00006383053,0.00003469069,0.000005054862,0.000035919504,0.00054664956,0.00018903219,0.000044728557,0.99709547,0.0019684704,0.000004594531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013358651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095685263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026946777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042192526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054952963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14250994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727273490","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12425","title":"Experimental work on the norms of assertion","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation; Rolex","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Cognition; Principal (computer security); Work (physics); Cognitive science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1933476619438803,"score_gpt":0.31189174323549074,"score_spread":0.11854408129161043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727273490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7445743,0.0007089781,0.022972096,0.0037512737,0.0007702048,0.0007629946,0.00029625391,0.00011026615,0.2260536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98658735,0.00019881446,0.005894854,0.0005247589,0.00014201085,0.0007120764,0.00011228455,0.000094271614,0.00573366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97192335,0.017900342,0.0018358232,0.003363103,0.0044092904,0.00056815124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75792015,0.1718438,0.022133963,0.03300924,0.012473218,0.0026196074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025438052,0.0007122488,0.0006071569,0.0009705163,0.002889345,0.00531371,0.0020666588,0.001992979,0.029337816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14926293,0.0006664987,0.00033523794,0.00076971494,0.01304608,0.0059398077,0.0042653494,0.0034895476,0.002025233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0054003997,0.009190609,0.023572842,0.0021312512,0.00022043746,0.00088943035,0.103649475,0.0016541525,0.051320575,0.71439844,0.006170877,0.08140157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003421372,0.008019683,0.05090726,0.0018043882,0.00041894327,0.0016757715,0.04320006,0.010203466,0.04364584,0.74968064,0.08662739,0.00039523642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011852867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087662047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029337816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019296554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014989919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1345309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734800671","doi":"10.7202/1040326ar","title":"Rationalité et affectivité des intuitions","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.5502084713390207,"score_gpt":0.4378429910160865,"score_spread":0.11236548032293425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734800671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14332405,0.0049722907,0.34188333,0.018211527,0.00051163643,0.00016293838,0.00038485668,0.00039639193,0.49015307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96245086,0.0010763984,0.02466932,0.00070247153,0.00014383755,0.00011112752,0.00009728823,0.000045986573,0.010702697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954595,0.0022009716,0.00020712578,0.00067826186,0.0011087119,0.00034542088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958098,0.002127022,0.00041575645,0.00066057575,0.0007968524,0.00018997394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004587529,0.0006107809,0.0004262501,0.0011411677,0.0010976221,0.005769052,0.0008221055,0.0016395679,0.00621501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008502539,0.00040645356,0.0009093033,0.00059072196,0.013100281,0.0054341774,0.002841245,0.0021634437,0.0007748566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011879774,0.000010365164,0.00024673532,0.000057638114,0.000012368949,0.000033303135,0.0017528879,0.00040928414,0.00031928578,0.9940462,0.00040857375,0.0026915153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018207988,0.000017865965,0.0010172423,0.00005065194,0.000014061511,0.000093151975,0.0007916306,0.0013577337,0.0004312308,0.98222363,0.013963366,0.000021198219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015774049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008371869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00621501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022976801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012876795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024261475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734814182","doi":"10.7202/1040328ar","title":"Intuition et lois logiques","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Intuition; Epistemology; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.5044543442902811,"score_gpt":0.428652675167189,"score_spread":0.07580166912309211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734814182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032967683,0.009807638,0.30517665,0.054666355,0.0015663931,0.0001451158,0.00056122406,0.0005739852,0.594535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8733352,0.0060255863,0.06834337,0.006619046,0.0014093575,0.0003509187,0.00051326596,0.00036329043,0.043039955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993194,0.0030729985,0.00037629087,0.00067935843,0.0020231311,0.0006541758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991996,0.004899471,0.00057239854,0.0008246785,0.001383683,0.00032376006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007127973,0.0009838477,0.0011251324,0.003783926,0.0038575032,0.008534597,0.0017397692,0.0039068493,0.012722504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013494493,0.0007200138,0.0015224556,0.0022498395,0.022421198,0.015229473,0.0048826896,0.007664504,0.0018651019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046220525,0.0000061490905,0.000036722224,0.000032216227,0.0000029850528,0.000019498504,0.00024463056,0.00018697628,0.000042355347,0.99760747,0.0006456495,0.001170642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006492342,0.0000049985733,0.000072560644,0.00004447017,0.0000027226165,0.000032574935,0.00019747838,0.0005848949,0.000071991446,0.9895834,0.009390323,0.000008263551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032577016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029692433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012722504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00638126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004058208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046299458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735266767","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1341781","title":"Epistemic buck-passing and the interpersonal view of testimony","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Testimonial; Epistemology; Reductionism; Philosophy; Interpersonal communication; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.07887050824485706,"score_gpt":0.26424391813652787,"score_spread":0.1853734098916708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735266767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075935155,0.002769299,0.13008356,0.058032762,0.0007296931,0.000111721005,0.00008285805,0.00015378011,0.7321012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98549277,0.00033069844,0.0060483273,0.0012891444,0.00020647563,0.00003253174,0.000013094877,0.000025101135,0.006561814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98226756,0.010759544,0.00067550916,0.0014924761,0.0036798427,0.0011250378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969249,0.02050692,0.0021512904,0.003458139,0.003427153,0.0012075232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013009887,0.00055564725,0.00069593283,0.0031476156,0.0075144926,0.009613855,0.0020996192,0.005412039,0.0060107936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03162753,0.0005667093,0.0008123005,0.0010557033,0.04293801,0.012857923,0.00851786,0.007933977,0.00063154224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007841289,0.000006537723,0.00009704131,0.000033805383,0.0000055208884,0.00011906874,0.003929475,0.00021876734,0.00006901877,0.9933351,0.0004517308,0.0017259754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007504918,0.000012040911,0.00013686816,0.00009182437,0.000014638236,0.0001367283,0.0016716114,0.00091264845,0.00030023782,0.9853527,0.011349604,0.000013630575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032911098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022812919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013009887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006194898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002656289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06880373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736235872","doi":"10.7202/1040329ar","title":"De l’impossibilité du savoir intuitif conçu comme état purement mental et d’une difficulté que cela soulève pour l’évidentialisme1","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.34992668815973754,"score_gpt":0.3865103299351215,"score_spread":0.03658364177538398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736235872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08469793,0.00869111,0.31825715,0.13574877,0.0031220422,0.000112960945,0.00020849932,0.00023717835,0.4489242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9377701,0.0022968203,0.032329153,0.005369759,0.0014315692,0.0001797119,0.00010690974,0.00015169542,0.020364303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893891,0.005177316,0.0005256647,0.0018415168,0.0023726162,0.0006938318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762971,0.014602483,0.0017130385,0.0042293756,0.0024775534,0.0006804714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012470177,0.0008135755,0.0009068029,0.0016367291,0.0048540854,0.009772061,0.0024816038,0.006539559,0.00900651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023296949,0.0007725934,0.0015505576,0.00094614667,0.049386583,0.017839413,0.0072028087,0.010595753,0.0014217658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008519979,0.0000062510485,0.00012723354,0.00002954289,0.000007527199,0.00003063049,0.001228668,0.000081988794,0.00008270714,0.9965994,0.000501961,0.0012956372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011433051,0.0000131290135,0.0002922581,0.0000836892,0.0000103197635,0.00009762634,0.0009169603,0.0005240456,0.00023244607,0.9815223,0.016280629,0.000015164139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026184232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028354174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012470177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042963107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004033219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06594938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736825968","doi":"10.1093/analys/anx082","title":"Epistemic Evaluation: Purposeful Evaluation By David K. Henderson and John Greco","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology of Wikipedia; Social epistemology; Sociology; Epistemic virtue; Philosophy; Virtue; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13646189563495761,"score_gpt":0.3459592797178043,"score_spread":0.2094973840828467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736825968","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005106781,0.10791479,0.060975175,0.59466064,0.008286298,0.00019799704,0.00009341575,0.0003113367,0.22245361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4622061,0.14110924,0.057848148,0.113116995,0.0082279,0.00089583755,0.00017632805,0.0012189085,0.21520056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98765415,0.008654805,0.00029253814,0.000653411,0.0024240278,0.00032112427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97137475,0.022870772,0.00054104696,0.000734087,0.0037377644,0.0007415593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01476199,0.0005471321,0.0006901507,0.0020111832,0.0042912466,0.011022248,0.00086852326,0.0029375036,0.0030098238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027707236,0.00050909317,0.0003469146,0.001784631,0.018085675,0.014779157,0.0034088404,0.006881584,0.0013649715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026646792,0.000024645946,0.00022729077,0.00017668332,0.00001164524,0.00007773966,0.0063576433,0.00044622447,0.00011071723,0.73185635,0.21638025,0.04430415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009508922,0.000010050303,0.0002615087,0.00064433616,0.000013053427,0.00009174013,0.0035039904,0.0008349016,0.00033604607,0.35785723,0.6363994,0.00003828691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011848665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0115051875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01476199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076093148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060210098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07806975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740630192","doi":"10.7202/1073305ar","title":"On Taking Experts' Word for Things: Disagreeing with Battersby","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Word (group theory); Computer science; Linguistics; Psychology; Natural language processing; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10812300725362532,"score_gpt":0.2683463765193482,"score_spread":0.16022336926572284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740630192","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024736503,0.0017786222,0.0012775413,0.97784597,0.0043033366,0.000008277603,0.000008585537,0.00001073403,0.012293274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1757049,0.002933367,0.0033247564,0.79908246,0.0061349683,0.00010974888,0.00002681097,0.00019198479,0.012491004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.947012,0.034666374,0.002273984,0.0047986116,0.008233928,0.003015034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7954359,0.15752974,0.0047513545,0.00441389,0.029248804,0.008620363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06674689,0.0008253602,0.0020851395,0.0029407023,0.024060365,0.019981267,0.005564624,0.029525096,0.005902294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16567548,0.0007296656,0.0007339176,0.0029802592,0.058927733,0.030500898,0.010302133,0.067888446,0.0021728363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006779706,0.00003449373,0.00063034607,0.00011835378,0.000035179895,0.00038805042,0.06639448,0.000093311595,0.00010888868,0.4613739,0.45725897,0.0134962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006999927,0.000025116313,0.0006890776,0.0014823949,0.000042866723,0.0005348085,0.119399354,0.00063370046,0.00038449222,0.51318073,0.3634002,0.0001573107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018081564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023058001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06674689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071308888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015441817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3529955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744991123","doi":"10.7202/1073425ar","title":"Open-mindedness Revisited: A Response to Cornel Hamm","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Crisis response; Political science; Public relations","score_opus":0.18079778987981013,"score_gpt":0.3147020651341823,"score_spread":0.13390427525437218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744991123","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044932566,0.00485402,0.00018448247,0.9889792,0.0036726862,0.0000025912225,0.000008111951,0.000004620649,0.0018449462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04361646,0.0064871144,0.00068617135,0.92972744,0.013031047,0.000054264343,0.000016512422,0.000104932966,0.0062760483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866064,0.007318297,0.0006120562,0.0019674064,0.0025096177,0.0009862708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91838497,0.07037412,0.0011806816,0.0014005813,0.005992583,0.0026671574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024423078,0.0008452716,0.002454098,0.0019676462,0.014192407,0.015970584,0.0042910734,0.036873672,0.0059043732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069368854,0.0006936127,0.0009840201,0.002688283,0.03614705,0.026177498,0.010756021,0.06515379,0.0018472474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051538747,0.000040160165,0.00018342433,0.00015451062,0.000017120548,0.00036916888,0.016170941,0.00010898368,0.000092237446,0.4011862,0.5756049,0.006020718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008521156,0.000018713909,0.00034717994,0.0009509075,0.000022668679,0.00036612203,0.028688367,0.00039004494,0.00025144004,0.2865706,0.6821804,0.00012838028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011567524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011737226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036873672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008388953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010365485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12916315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746667616","doi":"","title":"Scientifically Responsible Metaphysics: A Program for the Naturalization of Metaphysics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metaphysics; Naturalization; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.1585404972896758,"score_gpt":0.3164575112740445,"score_spread":0.15791701398436866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746667616","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011897508,0.0037525825,0.6087699,0.1511106,0.0020249903,0.00034587478,0.0002485663,0.00063153193,0.2212185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67162377,0.0033884111,0.27217346,0.014641119,0.0038951456,0.0016380145,0.00031666976,0.0009670001,0.031356327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98767763,0.0075649866,0.0004175675,0.0015114462,0.0023337626,0.0004945631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765139,0.014785853,0.0010839759,0.0046653887,0.002346715,0.0006041217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02020391,0.0009336558,0.0010073996,0.0027001014,0.0041967663,0.008554916,0.0026868018,0.003976766,0.007955219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029387826,0.0007645517,0.002107661,0.001246486,0.05702194,0.015826233,0.0068590986,0.012927712,0.0017926319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037310626,0.000006360227,0.00001850156,0.000010554566,0.000002161504,0.0000048922157,0.00016331812,0.00022183596,0.000032038268,0.9979061,0.0006043628,0.0010261941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071472027,0.0000037869922,0.000019674379,0.00001612636,0.0000012734082,0.000004260356,0.000045074547,0.0005059762,0.000053000796,0.9925377,0.0068020243,0.00000393066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026112304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014216298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02020391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075712763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007729633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10684973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751008220","doi":"","title":"Judging the Superego: A Dialogue","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of psychoanalysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Id, ego and super-ego; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.1054580604502129,"score_gpt":0.27619806734935376,"score_spread":0.17074000689914087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751008220","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032994613,0.018263644,0.016700879,0.70428514,0.0044358545,0.0000874373,0.00010202907,0.000053330503,0.22307706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.922977,0.0062627024,0.009802585,0.046996653,0.0017990379,0.0001073337,0.000051631803,0.00022978356,0.011773365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97482294,0.017635178,0.0005904794,0.0017152464,0.0034895015,0.0017466354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94405144,0.046293076,0.00094586355,0.0015439163,0.0047387565,0.002426906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036975365,0.00083096826,0.001551773,0.003884137,0.021333866,0.027187122,0.0057750666,0.021983463,0.008328116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06461388,0.00073849893,0.0007428766,0.003174591,0.078956224,0.029736822,0.009261216,0.02237233,0.0008351193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004157765,0.000018787112,0.00029123435,0.00010517365,0.000011792371,0.00041191955,0.10589467,0.00016840023,0.00018954145,0.86282545,0.018852845,0.011188579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030660947,0.0000143100215,0.00084436464,0.00095932314,0.000014592135,0.00024371991,0.17039564,0.00063696975,0.0002798096,0.56022966,0.2662842,0.00006670438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0925642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12502265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0925642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027596377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02807847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20022666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755107964","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4936","title":"Wohlrapp's concept of justification","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Foundation (evidence); Principal (computer security); Section (typography); Focus (optics); Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.13700339787255736,"score_gpt":0.3094114464042696,"score_spread":0.17240804853171224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755107964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01206944,0.01341629,0.07750672,0.17740414,0.0025067916,0.00011856042,0.00022446802,0.00016199138,0.71659166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8940572,0.0058263494,0.033168077,0.016927414,0.003650136,0.00055455614,0.00011185545,0.00014120972,0.04556321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898873,0.0059203412,0.0003498387,0.0010886863,0.0022038824,0.0005498869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98960334,0.0075495704,0.0006589372,0.000855504,0.0010071058,0.00032549992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007435344,0.0005175393,0.000593425,0.0029216518,0.004704162,0.0070223347,0.0015056052,0.006220093,0.0065068644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01700062,0.00036310425,0.00069522223,0.002116523,0.039752338,0.012041389,0.004429118,0.007542203,0.0010817817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017590617,9.0767907e-7,0.00001037179,0.000008967933,5.9030805e-7,0.000009480495,0.00048791373,0.000018713165,0.000006934351,0.99712557,0.0016306782,0.0006980452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006945376,0.00000407208,0.000053641845,0.00006183596,0.000002327224,0.00004259524,0.00030237762,0.00015084323,0.000044833374,0.9297599,0.06956497,0.000005637608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002321322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018515139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007435344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004421893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039214655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039322317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755214255","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4832","title":"Issues of Logicism and Objectivity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Objectivity (philosophy); Sociology","score_opus":0.10860358335288248,"score_gpt":0.31582165329602374,"score_spread":0.20721806994314126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755214255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015152395,0.015900806,0.18052824,0.3332311,0.0024909915,0.00010200993,0.00020874981,0.00027542814,0.4521103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8268804,0.007504222,0.06608886,0.042801768,0.0072054956,0.00078289467,0.00016086214,0.00047065783,0.04810483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809239,0.012569091,0.00062082434,0.0018104679,0.0030489345,0.0010268092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97490704,0.020308876,0.00080818345,0.0019669663,0.0014559918,0.0005529627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022817113,0.0008068363,0.0012139544,0.003096701,0.0069260327,0.014638418,0.0028009643,0.0076360684,0.0068307063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024419453,0.00065376604,0.0016312794,0.0019814398,0.07052891,0.023088511,0.006895954,0.014157465,0.00141436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017313071,0.0000022711204,0.000011732235,0.000007612733,0.0000015356356,0.000008058542,0.00034588636,0.000034574932,0.000010647862,0.99834025,0.00066603534,0.0005696168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003904884,0.000001653711,0.000011188923,0.000016745655,8.9709516e-7,0.000008962499,0.00011566,0.00008216366,0.000023389968,0.9922936,0.00743921,0.0000025902273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020684416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001142517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022817113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008577194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037774155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1206699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W27621635","doi":"10.2147/ndt.s109328","title":"Argumentation and the epistemology of disagreement","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Social epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02405682799969686,"score_gpt":0.23355752707945726,"score_spread":0.2095006990797604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W27621635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16793801,0.0074922363,0.13618891,0.17966853,0.0020002632,0.00034639335,0.00012555471,0.00019147892,0.50604856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860853,0.00068826997,0.007345535,0.0025830776,0.00029260208,0.000115236544,0.000034110963,0.000052552496,0.002803217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8012293,0.16931778,0.005399088,0.0066761007,0.012944004,0.0044336994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7760156,0.18190359,0.013333329,0.01282247,0.012462638,0.0034624347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10038473,0.00093917444,0.0013343209,0.00801602,0.01763055,0.020866565,0.0036420273,0.01099563,0.0042414907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14413977,0.00082613685,0.00143881,0.0040437407,0.096086025,0.029581433,0.019574706,0.008881444,0.0006879164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026862206,0.000014311748,0.0008286946,0.00008872914,0.000020089796,0.00032394976,0.105258346,0.00019660899,0.00009706988,0.88586354,0.0016078728,0.00567385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045078235,0.000017866769,0.0003790685,0.00036887507,0.000015822712,0.0002958696,0.050552323,0.0010923019,0.00020705459,0.90088123,0.046107326,0.000037212554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018978312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083815504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10038473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010893436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007595694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53089154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763699835","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v12i1.207","title":"Ends to Means","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Action (physics); Mathematical economics; Epistemology; Probability theory; Mathematics; Philosophy; Statistics; Physics","score_opus":0.2549660712055516,"score_gpt":0.3692213849265189,"score_spread":0.11425531372096731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763699835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01994687,0.0051498404,0.33152807,0.034148008,0.0027840396,0.00011805804,0.00025530905,0.00036156538,0.6057083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8890731,0.0028368037,0.041141037,0.009736385,0.002560575,0.0003859405,0.00021011237,0.00046750493,0.053588543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890548,0.0046487832,0.0005327821,0.0023584953,0.0024975971,0.00090757426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816881,0.011177088,0.0014290437,0.002880542,0.0021024682,0.0007228513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006707103,0.0010016904,0.00080910214,0.001950498,0.005000348,0.008719409,0.0014390264,0.0041167936,0.014096738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02426346,0.0006578627,0.0016976133,0.0009729555,0.025813825,0.017174173,0.0074377446,0.0077400818,0.0025269852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004405188,0.0000017345707,0.00003307788,0.000014660201,0.000002471994,0.000014255505,0.0003257566,0.00007328333,0.000027619237,0.9975139,0.00065665034,0.001332114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036313984,0.000008007959,0.000063011146,0.000046336376,0.000005811304,0.000048617654,0.00020816032,0.00016794738,0.0001589836,0.9731887,0.026093718,0.0000071080954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008081156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006039128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014096738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029879215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019196816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0471583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765822788","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12467","title":"Frauds, Posers And Sheep: A Virtue Theoretic Solution To The Acquaintance Debate","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Competence (human resources); Pessimism; Philosophy; Epistemic virtue; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.28017045503461835,"score_gpt":0.3819201367417756,"score_spread":0.10174968170715726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765822788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08560987,0.0032188443,0.2827569,0.16384561,0.0011516318,0.0002010764,0.00007935407,0.00017612724,0.46296054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9425517,0.0005668603,0.028949032,0.006416273,0.0005172912,0.00016622075,0.000025544048,0.0000736793,0.02073341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866579,0.0079071475,0.00045325523,0.0015445504,0.0025177666,0.000919315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98831975,0.00692009,0.0010165118,0.0022137635,0.0010445276,0.00048535486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018219534,0.0005083353,0.0009817053,0.0021554662,0.0068949973,0.007604013,0.0024418554,0.011011561,0.006543938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028015323,0.00070813077,0.0011149182,0.0010341362,0.04909538,0.0153791625,0.0093773175,0.009822461,0.0006789814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039581,0.000004656137,0.000043529533,0.000007498492,0.000002188419,0.000046985915,0.00072606665,0.00010197983,0.000023132494,0.9974554,0.0005898328,0.0009948404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008694808,0.0000049475566,0.000056436384,0.000018330864,0.000002848799,0.00008005111,0.000328326,0.0007981123,0.000050022525,0.99245924,0.006186977,0.0000059015265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014993465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014852011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018219534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035846517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029171656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09635526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767561991","doi":"10.4000/books.pum.3421","title":"4. Le savoir selon Guillaume d’Ockham","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.02417717989502342,"score_gpt":0.18883550735466326,"score_spread":0.16465832745963985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767561991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063876705,0.089161046,0.0043879757,0.089915805,0.0072046565,0.00003768774,0.00026134966,0.00010327312,0.80254054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15569036,0.022188319,0.003236975,0.02657064,0.0031010655,0.00008777487,0.00012683474,0.00030793913,0.78869015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912494,0.00021607247,0.000029156934,0.0002198887,0.0002728965,0.00013710833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995028,0.00019336966,0.000037893664,0.000059231388,0.0001612155,0.000045499204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007963535,0.0006105726,0.0003813452,0.0010325626,0.0045142863,0.003980791,0.0006593365,0.002645052,0.016504567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022534432,0.00029319778,0.00039346624,0.00094320625,0.006854306,0.0045767114,0.0019590054,0.0044187703,0.0044334535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037773418,0.000011060613,0.00021440301,0.00008909513,0.0000051272605,0.00007248177,0.0032839405,0.0000706167,0.00017737261,0.8589648,0.114202246,0.0228711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008791195,0.000006921536,0.00038570433,0.00015345859,0.0000029697926,0.00007135609,0.00041787952,0.000053676573,0.00017827706,0.06492665,0.93378407,0.000010230577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031058472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05196538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031058472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005221503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003439081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06175536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767785985","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12420","title":"Reply to Hofweber and Ninan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Art history; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Art; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.48682226019361063,"score_gpt":0.4249492441244035,"score_spread":0.06187301606920714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767785985","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008655203,0.0012217241,0.00006819817,0.9872175,0.010884182,0.00000271208,0.000018577837,0.00000612194,0.00049454113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024649308,0.0008514812,0.00013583597,0.98050666,0.014076781,0.000030856918,0.000013531356,0.000020191215,0.0018997256],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908839,0.003736399,0.000878621,0.0015537026,0.0022725356,0.0006748395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9305397,0.054313637,0.002289127,0.002520892,0.007966473,0.0023701289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017690178,0.0010874128,0.0024595568,0.0019545858,0.0071978485,0.00789892,0.0042342083,0.047897715,0.0073059034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090891235,0.001099255,0.0012538084,0.0019918953,0.015710173,0.015437585,0.006992986,0.07647523,0.0062706154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035687925,0.000011809001,0.00012774392,0.00008463987,0.000016770808,0.00009119151,0.0007312533,0.000030143725,0.000034473476,0.015740111,0.98087597,0.0022203496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008854474,0.00001751948,0.0010255645,0.0008178646,0.000042757656,0.00036811753,0.0037098438,0.00020582203,0.00021748284,0.058790036,0.93461716,0.00009913722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007962191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008211833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047897715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059085367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073889103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09355575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769791745","doi":"10.1017/s1358246117000273","title":"Three Ways to Improve Religious Epistemology","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Epistemology; Work (physics); Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.08454944971527283,"score_gpt":0.29289736016581225,"score_spread":0.2083479104505394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769791745","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011130482,0.010514959,0.10424416,0.6207869,0.0068965983,0.00021811377,0.000100351266,0.00047859963,0.24562973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7132685,0.008439615,0.17648898,0.06430641,0.006618189,0.0007368812,0.00012808367,0.00048410587,0.029529171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775574,0.015704216,0.00088959694,0.0010656987,0.0034823385,0.0013005972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9544924,0.020839639,0.0027750037,0.011055264,0.0073518953,0.0034858196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0341717,0.0010910238,0.0013503452,0.004927116,0.008003168,0.015515552,0.0037857634,0.011230245,0.012358471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052294478,0.0006783236,0.001468154,0.0032099506,0.059837066,0.024594944,0.021332268,0.020165,0.0026987942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013789526,0.000020270547,0.0000764769,0.00004981846,0.000006148383,0.000022995378,0.0011591134,0.00010239657,0.000045589466,0.98934513,0.003935868,0.0052224337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026828393,0.000016567694,0.00010838488,0.00016209259,0.0000081461485,0.000034998364,0.0010743727,0.00031311848,0.00012779582,0.9604742,0.0376334,0.000019943709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036301578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042054355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0341717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008461882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010256363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18071938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778934366","doi":"","title":"Dueling Theories: Thought Experiments in Cognitive Science - eScholarship","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thought experiment; Narrative; Epistemology; Cognition; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.045103569255898694,"score_gpt":0.31227094882319867,"score_spread":0.26716737956729997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778934366","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031539515,0.022256786,0.7420727,0.07033096,0.0023584075,0.00058631075,0.00019774941,0.0007938089,0.12986389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7136175,0.0058532525,0.26454803,0.0047671073,0.0015876951,0.0019158932,0.00013866737,0.00032110227,0.0072507923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95122296,0.041017547,0.001135721,0.0026528346,0.0033110615,0.00065983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77226657,0.20711468,0.0052590067,0.0101762,0.0037962813,0.001387389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060964834,0.0012058181,0.0014788483,0.0048692795,0.005123593,0.010609725,0.0030700997,0.006356085,0.009240636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11441151,0.0010672555,0.0022723523,0.003611817,0.073451504,0.04056433,0.0073290197,0.009702349,0.0008407179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015429168,0.000012008195,0.000077574405,0.00005877987,0.0000075332637,0.000026983109,0.0016318224,0.00023072847,0.000036977013,0.99319553,0.00062289176,0.004083729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017784487,0.000006652812,0.000030797455,0.00004117164,0.000002667679,0.000017255736,0.00017673259,0.00046187663,0.000036925696,0.99657106,0.0026307388,0.0000063665766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011401284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070571556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060964834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067168525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00295277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32241672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782079141","doi":"10.1111/meta.12279","title":"Show Me the Argument: Empirically Testing the Armchair Philosophy Picture","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Inductive reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; A priori and a posteriori; Point (geometry); Mathematics","score_opus":0.14925560794152187,"score_gpt":0.28480463656376265,"score_spread":0.13554902862224077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782079141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9647338,0.0009110334,0.0051703663,0.0035498252,0.000118868134,0.0002542314,0.0002880415,0.000033461027,0.024940426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956618,0.00023378052,0.0022975435,0.0004373368,0.000062738,0.00025137,0.00021494253,0.000020836831,0.00081953395],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96010286,0.026537223,0.0023921968,0.0034007835,0.0064183804,0.0011484686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45714247,0.44919556,0.04052276,0.017578669,0.03225377,0.0033067963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041634645,0.00038642867,0.00092558196,0.0053913523,0.0023286752,0.0061400356,0.0021430904,0.003628804,0.009148989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28565553,0.0004634004,0.00046307716,0.007354977,0.006145037,0.014409039,0.004950029,0.0046913847,0.001916002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0063913907,0.0069176843,0.4299551,0.003038997,0.001179842,0.0024215619,0.19222191,0.0042891437,0.007466117,0.21078762,0.0101437755,0.12518685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011958454,0.007800373,0.41113764,0.003011019,0.0017602383,0.0014703968,0.24188219,0.026465282,0.012117591,0.18892674,0.103854746,0.0003780242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010802555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087038695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041634645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017085497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001497925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22018772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787680258","doi":"10.1111/meta.12194","title":"Truth Analysis of the Gettier Argument","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Scrutiny; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Construct (python library); Analytic philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Contemporary philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06180871193112166,"score_gpt":0.24956945785407172,"score_spread":0.18776074592295006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787680258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06918578,0.0031140037,0.34110746,0.049040418,0.0018405961,0.00015850754,0.00027243147,0.00046028022,0.5348205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957053,0.0004347484,0.02574314,0.0036935892,0.0005825069,0.000093863295,0.00008800688,0.00013403356,0.012176977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858655,0.0068718507,0.00058539433,0.0018667205,0.003927819,0.0008828037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97164065,0.020179864,0.0011333869,0.0029844083,0.003522319,0.0005393803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012641465,0.0006462307,0.0008961086,0.0049092243,0.004081575,0.006003724,0.001965692,0.00561439,0.017231226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03804509,0.000556992,0.002013033,0.002468159,0.021416396,0.012776979,0.007919391,0.0056101163,0.0010870192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008018831,0.0000039904626,0.00005018021,0.000016202917,0.0000066368475,0.00003560876,0.00032837645,0.00013178654,0.00004743424,0.9976483,0.0006412392,0.0010822151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068737872,0.000005769599,0.0000604298,0.00002715205,0.000008844882,0.00003476966,0.00015847314,0.00144731,0.00023447181,0.99332494,0.004685183,0.000005690608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011212282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008259353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017231226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042539244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001253246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06685525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789571051","doi":"10.1007/s10988-017-9211-1","title":"Decision-theoretic relativity in deontic modality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistics and Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deontic logic; Expressivism; Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Modality (human–computer interaction); Meaning (existential); Semantics (computer science); Modal; Truth condition; Implicature; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Modal logic; Linguistics; Pragmatics; Possible world; Metaphysics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","score_opus":0.05751073847903755,"score_gpt":0.28891538731528504,"score_spread":0.2314046488362475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789571051","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08451339,0.007122777,0.592266,0.041277662,0.0013304999,0.00011494378,0.00050823647,0.00028297413,0.2725836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9477372,0.0013331971,0.038204353,0.0014878165,0.0016666703,0.00019120036,0.00021837244,0.00013601975,0.009025117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867662,0.006847042,0.0009406753,0.0022618352,0.0023277653,0.0008563771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731727,0.019982731,0.001030166,0.0032049587,0.0019788593,0.0006306197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016398517,0.000796591,0.0018293338,0.0033015087,0.0057152724,0.01025088,0.0026679565,0.0050702374,0.007931936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029880473,0.0015265434,0.002440217,0.0026169852,0.018852502,0.025605006,0.005711713,0.008976143,0.0007737564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044277285,0.000005039323,0.000035105455,0.000011043095,0.0000043520627,0.00000841902,0.00014413455,0.00018145457,0.000022440083,0.9989016,0.00017841697,0.00050348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040662026,0.0000021474023,0.000026452208,0.0000064099813,0.0000031616557,0.000008829035,0.00003180829,0.00044955657,0.000029242337,0.9986456,0.00078937714,0.0000034441357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034015437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00248222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016398517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069483635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003218284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0867247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792093414","doi":"10.1007/s10503-018-9456-z","title":"David Hitchcock (2017): On Reasoning and Argument: Essays in Informal Logic and Critical Thinking","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Communication studies; Political communication; Critical thinking; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science; Argumentation theory; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.05187436558278319,"score_gpt":0.31249694906645137,"score_spread":0.2606225834836682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792093414","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037949858,0.1924129,0.013230824,0.7349211,0.022439227,0.000049409286,0.00020913918,0.00009488017,0.032847535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27135843,0.12816224,0.01748851,0.37791145,0.07763219,0.00044866014,0.00050548214,0.000702787,0.12579018],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580127,0.0030205576,0.00012525571,0.00033749692,0.00057424366,0.00014127645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98181087,0.014785703,0.000506126,0.00033436983,0.0018287174,0.00073421304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004847486,0.0015068084,0.0010012906,0.002723866,0.005239058,0.010359407,0.0017235997,0.0107110385,0.010656552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022196008,0.00044793202,0.0004920212,0.00469567,0.012729735,0.01595269,0.004810182,0.012176518,0.0035755306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005042803,0.00005053365,0.00052243436,0.0003282045,0.00002666362,0.00011674993,0.009216375,0.00021909639,0.000107352884,0.35493872,0.6137569,0.02066656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053677737,0.000014169665,0.0009801477,0.0016103459,0.000028174154,0.00015250572,0.0075358343,0.0004204211,0.00039147623,0.4701236,0.51863223,0.00005740767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009307801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014606025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0107110385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004250593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004201623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035649776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792140173","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i1.5070","title":"Critical Review: On Reasoning and Argument","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Philosophy; Sociology; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.08499954083385157,"score_gpt":0.31517669242290136,"score_spread":0.23017715158904978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792140173","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003295292,0.74782926,0.009282362,0.20760189,0.025043467,0.0000807036,0.000060745217,0.000043512046,0.009728592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047575977,0.7265613,0.0134608345,0.12382113,0.08089349,0.0005984917,0.00015376387,0.00018291318,0.0067520943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9120112,0.06602555,0.0042391955,0.0035563756,0.012721874,0.0014457874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69475436,0.2688797,0.00722437,0.0063686385,0.020889824,0.0018830633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0610131,0.0018452624,0.0026982902,0.010867454,0.003334548,0.010805526,0.0031420963,0.011395884,0.005092981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21460804,0.00077282795,0.0013993764,0.006229573,0.02623769,0.014944734,0.005274287,0.010567373,0.0018694594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011647141,0.000026135673,0.00020868825,0.010290424,0.00035466647,0.00027224893,0.0027569835,0.0005642697,0.00019880278,0.5885218,0.3137182,0.082971305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090124435,0.00004053539,0.0002464985,0.016382083,0.00010208465,0.00018059956,0.0009793759,0.0002484695,0.00021711778,0.47181413,0.50964385,0.00005513759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036088852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035331354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0610131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00899475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01299273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.322672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792538394","doi":"10.1080/07468342.2000.11974126","title":"Fallacies, Flaws, and Flimflam","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College Mathematics Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Mathematics education; Calculus (dental)","score_opus":0.04480239454484786,"score_gpt":0.24269056182721496,"score_spread":0.1978881672823671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792538394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23742162,0.0063437917,0.20881826,0.14590023,0.0016616575,0.00016478538,0.00053991383,0.0012513408,0.39789844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720231,0.0005111634,0.020018257,0.0016874248,0.00018509333,0.00006911817,0.000085502215,0.0001290619,0.0052913832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891685,0.005449282,0.0006551132,0.0013473823,0.0023641242,0.001015483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96491086,0.019678894,0.0026151726,0.007226027,0.004574162,0.0009949276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014314931,0.0006210062,0.0010019653,0.0043751793,0.006882558,0.008353092,0.001974679,0.0047068796,0.010454602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0796958,0.0007778132,0.0009755907,0.002835532,0.028851843,0.017693475,0.007994795,0.0060587823,0.0011796014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003592444,0.000019851588,0.001475624,0.000039663344,0.000013858483,0.00012538288,0.0023249974,0.00035264075,0.00006500227,0.9803405,0.0038762493,0.011330253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011787422,0.000007797494,0.00027252067,0.000063013096,0.000011152661,0.00014059582,0.0009309292,0.0012338532,0.00017499384,0.9863055,0.010836495,0.0000113947735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030776924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003084365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014314931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045073186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029678715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07570553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792688094","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2017.1402698","title":"Assessment context-sensitive logical claims","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Logical consequence; Logical truth; Taste; Relation (database); Coherence theory of truth; Logical conjunction; Logical form; Philosophy; Computer science; Psychology; Pragmatic theory of truth; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.17838227393059344,"score_gpt":0.3583122909505455,"score_spread":0.17993001701995207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792688094","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043477505,0.0041589,0.7121225,0.025183713,0.00050524424,0.00018287078,0.00019510879,0.00031498467,0.21385916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9218667,0.0011501391,0.06678178,0.002873507,0.0004738423,0.00022351774,0.00010152608,0.00012724537,0.006401677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840391,0.008350554,0.0011059338,0.0025146944,0.003305962,0.0006836602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767295,0.015354998,0.0016062417,0.0027937102,0.0029809622,0.0005346005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01770835,0.00081273325,0.00090617023,0.0037133568,0.0034602517,0.007187616,0.0022653393,0.0041208616,0.0064601195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031083632,0.0008081444,0.0020371587,0.0023554203,0.020760518,0.022418523,0.008440389,0.006780301,0.00079037866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012395973,0.000009276198,0.00013468598,0.000044927856,0.00000967187,0.000049423143,0.00139311,0.00032640557,0.00014789101,0.99480623,0.0002686981,0.0027972958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076406695,0.0000098485625,0.00017250984,0.000036100002,0.000008738943,0.00004053738,0.0002508534,0.0010652047,0.000271231,0.9934204,0.0047056573,0.000011262042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011820574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095447706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01770835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050438414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018781644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09365183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794670849","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.023","title":"Revisiting norms of assertion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Assertion; Psychology; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Cognition; Cognitive science; Principal (computer security); Process (computing); Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.08697616063877135,"score_gpt":0.2940381862622796,"score_spread":0.20706202562350828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794670849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10557019,0.0043993797,0.30031505,0.07092753,0.0016642297,0.00009896404,0.00022033199,0.00026000474,0.51654434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97501254,0.00043321692,0.018200565,0.0016938199,0.0005003194,0.000096485775,0.00008144467,0.00011842481,0.0038631852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95898074,0.026411092,0.0021900043,0.0049537895,0.005797621,0.0016667572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9092176,0.061938148,0.004936767,0.012611057,0.009984296,0.0013120549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029505437,0.00069731305,0.0012493815,0.0034953323,0.0056727314,0.014895165,0.0036685523,0.005380044,0.006521903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08582913,0.00073036767,0.0010914011,0.0021187146,0.054751363,0.027519932,0.0069954502,0.00725796,0.00076919066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072153407,0.0000048939655,0.00013908524,0.000016526667,0.000004383405,0.000014094654,0.0023735152,0.00007292797,0.00002560169,0.99539584,0.00031206768,0.0016339034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067703204,0.0000031523912,0.00008576564,0.00003646799,0.000004583388,0.000014192208,0.000921795,0.00033446375,0.00007521969,0.995106,0.0034069717,0.0000045410584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044784136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003295591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029505437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047554346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006260847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1560415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798608906","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.429","title":"Argument Strength, the Toulmin Model, and Ampliative Probability","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Explication; Warrant; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Rebuttal; Demonstrative; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.13417846293780228,"score_gpt":0.26761529086573543,"score_spread":0.13343682792793315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798608906","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09503306,0.003933221,0.5294783,0.060362805,0.0006041548,0.00027100663,0.00028163678,0.00027155742,0.30976424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9550223,0.00083034666,0.035076756,0.0020655624,0.00057169935,0.00030723476,0.000063944826,0.00008267724,0.0059794174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852437,0.0070463,0.00091907295,0.0021463546,0.0036835528,0.0009610789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93309635,0.04883096,0.0058317403,0.0062099006,0.004272853,0.0017581936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018914673,0.0008497083,0.0014955527,0.005565701,0.0032682023,0.0070292046,0.0027618036,0.0056045777,0.007656464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05561219,0.00081322284,0.0018808623,0.00250396,0.028839951,0.02067472,0.0076908604,0.0056780623,0.0009642104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008294766,0.0000050630765,0.000108221146,0.00002742155,0.000006333695,0.00002465292,0.00019270845,0.00020215944,0.000043126704,0.9981846,0.00024915364,0.00094822585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009442527,0.000005511239,0.00007759092,0.000019680534,0.0000069549633,0.000032521973,0.000069835194,0.0007641611,0.00008018144,0.9971733,0.0017556131,0.000005072826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085964735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007721952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018914673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005539978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002271576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100031555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800787243","doi":"10.1017/s0012217317000518","title":"Early Studies in Human Reasoning: A Case Study of the Pitfalls of Interdisciplinary Work","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Cognitive science; Natural language; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.1478935531200956,"score_gpt":0.36783383029239786,"score_spread":0.21994027717230225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800787243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49932083,0.037632443,0.05378566,0.14031658,0.0011504153,0.00043192093,0.00008978393,0.00014274224,0.26712963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700317,0.0055489624,0.011696826,0.004610955,0.00028800598,0.00022009922,0.00003311811,0.00014181242,0.0074284873],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92133844,0.06740236,0.0012145282,0.0024541565,0.0051576537,0.0024328528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81777287,0.16127315,0.0037971255,0.008271698,0.004971242,0.0039140163],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06479702,0.0007432941,0.0010606116,0.0075619454,0.037829183,0.01567413,0.004709997,0.009771761,0.005708594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07431569,0.0010614293,0.0008196809,0.008863694,0.071276695,0.025268203,0.021113727,0.015961315,0.00062363193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051230927,0.00014359041,0.0018927275,0.0001523391,0.000015978609,0.0030864924,0.59026986,0.00015779784,0.00011721229,0.3875927,0.0027720837,0.013748031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048465972,0.00006596081,0.0016498802,0.0012031584,0.000021020309,0.0026103153,0.6102626,0.0006501748,0.0005463874,0.19331765,0.18958275,0.000041647094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009397889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015899355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96217084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013742902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006826259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3426835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809304055","doi":"10.1111/theo.12150","title":"Disagreement and Conceptual Understanding","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17736725409407775,"score_gpt":0.2910917078219759,"score_spread":0.11372445372789816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809304055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12716532,0.008748511,0.3379483,0.10497525,0.0011488082,0.0001667268,0.00018485905,0.00023899028,0.41942328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98118067,0.0007656421,0.01282156,0.0014610236,0.00021728658,0.00012504379,0.00007748508,0.00005163185,0.0032997476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9721068,0.01926555,0.0012446014,0.0027420036,0.003543795,0.001097289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735724,0.017602857,0.0023717463,0.003235585,0.002534774,0.0006826814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022356512,0.00073943415,0.0013906196,0.005325073,0.0072173825,0.012546095,0.002853051,0.005973831,0.004924758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038282663,0.00058464793,0.0011876323,0.0032363278,0.0738113,0.0319547,0.012444015,0.007284331,0.0006274709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055057403,0.000003482359,0.0000722238,0.000020720743,0.00000449419,0.000020403817,0.0048236065,0.00014694239,0.0000314558,0.99340147,0.0002469664,0.0012227304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050890135,0.0000032949142,0.00003544161,0.000039248807,0.0000028669524,0.000017538045,0.0016260479,0.0004013254,0.00003824605,0.9936464,0.00417964,0.0000049775545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019533583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006774638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022356512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007938118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003695673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11823392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811066564","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i2.4966","title":"The Epistemic Value of Deep Disagreements","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Monash University","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Humanities; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.048758547514344705,"score_gpt":0.2748051771569413,"score_spread":0.22604662964259659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811066564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09485241,0.00776911,0.26593965,0.07640996,0.0014563408,0.00021820627,0.000282652,0.00027474272,0.5527969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776324,0.0011071971,0.011332981,0.0020730156,0.00076580315,0.0001812586,0.00007008932,0.0000905054,0.006746775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9433858,0.035037432,0.0029637818,0.0053182933,0.009927909,0.0033668743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83680326,0.12911354,0.0096548395,0.012683896,0.008488779,0.0032555994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036902048,0.0009634418,0.0014889204,0.0037195664,0.008378048,0.01514383,0.002680723,0.010361148,0.008938893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.123304464,0.0010561565,0.0017762496,0.003303708,0.03783203,0.032830425,0.022607565,0.012522447,0.001027992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032733835,0.000010308952,0.0004053065,0.000079028854,0.000019330284,0.00011021402,0.0030849418,0.00051514787,0.00009492856,0.98949593,0.0005514134,0.0056008333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000083083,0.000005731996,0.00008739206,0.0000500096,0.000008532379,0.000046828478,0.0005021711,0.00060514105,0.000057171444,0.99515945,0.0034604236,0.00000877975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090766646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065518037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036902048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006093142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032096056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19515908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2813142211","doi":"10.1558/imre.32244","title":"Tacit &amp; Explicit Knowledge, by Harry Collins","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Implicit Religion","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Theology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06279518369909488,"score_gpt":0.31634681227504763,"score_spread":0.25355162857595276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2813142211","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023277514,0.8168295,0.008991865,0.06832757,0.0074152094,0.00004961763,0.00033858378,0.0003885056,0.097426295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02043908,0.5821085,0.014437044,0.024833983,0.00750225,0.00037471167,0.0005349269,0.0010177941,0.34875175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801266,0.0006387434,0.00019371993,0.00037729306,0.0006420953,0.00013549726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956726,0.0025462522,0.0003085957,0.00027284765,0.00089611456,0.00030360112],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003475054,0.00247349,0.0011348482,0.003749542,0.0024326895,0.0064729094,0.0017609124,0.004152271,0.023716472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076719816,0.0014623529,0.0005083963,0.005020678,0.007611796,0.017265659,0.0025791912,0.006136344,0.017722614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017617149,0.000014155155,0.0000771749,0.00052562926,0.000008859201,0.00005676519,0.0008793957,0.00014935683,0.00009200913,0.042288076,0.87762433,0.07826651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034189532,0.00000499156,0.00019804676,0.00071823923,0.0000058739947,0.00014123345,0.0003996519,0.00010487474,0.00012182878,0.02416044,0.9741277,0.000013788582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025518524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0395642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044098496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005440599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079339504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2859406215","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.013.34","title":"Subjective and Objective Reasons","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Adjudication; Task (project management); Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.04211841625498198,"score_gpt":0.21920399104239144,"score_spread":0.17708557478740947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2859406215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040778033,0.01462429,0.05426033,0.040273774,0.0021597124,0.00010678945,0.00022668122,0.00007790599,0.88419276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58143306,0.016052915,0.039811857,0.029426878,0.005845197,0.00069805136,0.0005110984,0.00054990384,0.32567108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839124,0.0078032603,0.00073587295,0.0015632737,0.0049800063,0.0010051873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98765695,0.0074114646,0.00074268674,0.0019512451,0.0017240201,0.0005136263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01278356,0.0009523007,0.0007078565,0.0026940873,0.003428522,0.013989038,0.0014982976,0.006289586,0.019383958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01809898,0.00055335165,0.0010747301,0.002206995,0.034748096,0.019927405,0.0069347783,0.009133311,0.0037735954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015293764,0.0000022242152,0.000032421965,0.000021352438,0.0000019057081,0.0000075262324,0.00058876607,0.000023069859,0.000014005902,0.99576265,0.0018884379,0.0016561591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048680804,0.00000583767,0.00015042776,0.00019203212,0.0000048428574,0.000052409217,0.0008994894,0.00011851297,0.00006849572,0.83352184,0.16497122,0.0000099818435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001550269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020771974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019383958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005454448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043864227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06760675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2866961001","doi":"10.1111/cogs.12621","title":"Knowledge and Assertion in Korean","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Assertion; Psychology; Norm (philosophy); Cognition; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09377786921119317,"score_gpt":0.34251630995632465,"score_spread":0.24873844074513146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2866961001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896798,0.00014292217,0.00056885416,0.000190055,0.00001158619,0.000018455217,0.00001854357,0.0000041155913,0.009365658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873656,0.00007756329,0.00043934133,0.00008356294,0.0000023066084,0.000012087447,0.0000208129,0.0000026288187,0.000625212],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785477,0.0009736546,0.00022824328,0.00036174688,0.0003831637,0.00019834795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98970795,0.005798052,0.0019125673,0.0010235702,0.0010962262,0.0004616673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045992024,0.00036668655,0.00032237777,0.00063995493,0.0019044064,0.0030829767,0.000578555,0.00066530146,0.0031623181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010538946,0.00022729159,0.00028131864,0.00079375936,0.003589908,0.003635971,0.0033294098,0.0010324729,0.0002244243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008510397,0.0012794146,0.14206383,0.00084377616,0.00008520171,0.0022687437,0.6791319,0.00056712556,0.026038699,0.05280716,0.0010705371,0.09299256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023555434,0.0016464822,0.2367605,0.00064086454,0.00034740023,0.0019690343,0.65721077,0.004509888,0.01771788,0.044647284,0.034020104,0.00029422608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004817311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045909625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004817311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012018352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013517418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024323165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883514089","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2018.1492837","title":"Succeeding competently: towards an anti-luck condition for achievement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Epistemology; Psychology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.10222320331851563,"score_gpt":0.2989897489072842,"score_spread":0.19676654558876855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883514089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22651182,0.0009631041,0.09080229,0.035969403,0.0003841434,0.00021209253,0.00045195004,0.00033505645,0.64437014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99284005,0.0001293652,0.0041910987,0.0005286202,0.000088930225,0.00008160057,0.0000563918,0.00003761286,0.0020464126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917653,0.0032511686,0.0007533329,0.0014067555,0.0014302714,0.0013930866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754234,0.011778863,0.0032592325,0.0025407802,0.0040119346,0.0029858595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008277538,0.0003485448,0.0008840633,0.0015900036,0.002537815,0.0051756725,0.0012115118,0.0037899432,0.011937144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020215986,0.00046637436,0.0007101792,0.0006754771,0.024346052,0.007904509,0.0060164053,0.005137753,0.0016595846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030173802,0.000025213054,0.00082116737,0.00003847202,0.0000052158553,0.00015583857,0.0009022213,0.0002285723,0.00020836132,0.9961123,0.0004617622,0.0010107349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003510418,0.000046470108,0.002412781,0.00006415908,0.000008866911,0.00018746323,0.0014539264,0.0017945876,0.00047502117,0.9869561,0.006536371,0.000029133158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012332588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011487587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011937144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028261328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032841894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043776333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884250261","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-94673-3_8","title":"The Wittgensteinian Position","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Skepticism; Certainty; Epistemology; Philosophy; Realism; Argument (complex analysis); Coherentism; Foundationalism","score_opus":0.0622197870584758,"score_gpt":0.2454484686237472,"score_spread":0.1832286815652714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884250261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069360775,0.014789735,0.027678372,0.04009551,0.0017154322,0.000019185325,0.00014098755,0.00008545213,0.90853924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5955857,0.010651629,0.020463614,0.019778846,0.0044814106,0.00025993204,0.0002403027,0.00044736106,0.3480912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984126,0.0005788061,0.000054476805,0.0003767865,0.00041098177,0.00016633613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893945,0.0005363676,0.00006977665,0.00021829829,0.00016710619,0.00006902117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002204665,0.0006204462,0.0005639795,0.002080428,0.0034729855,0.006761804,0.0013165685,0.003944822,0.008962045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038159417,0.00038900523,0.0005180654,0.001585374,0.026980795,0.012005868,0.002677529,0.007897347,0.0024929186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016926952,0.00000196978,0.000008553169,0.000006241326,9.719487e-7,0.0000033450863,0.00020729016,0.000015935031,0.000009031413,0.9970669,0.0015803511,0.0010977235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027471017,0.0000017575767,0.00002630919,0.00003117858,0.0000016448811,0.000015115734,0.00012920896,0.00007185261,0.000039799143,0.96644676,0.033231393,0.0000022385918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029166762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034646909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008962045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003991137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026246184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029981017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884478036","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-94673-3_2","title":"The Principal Argument for Epistemic Relativism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Skepticism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Principal (computer security); Philosophy; Function (biology); Computer science","score_opus":0.09381224563455343,"score_gpt":0.2751559788814113,"score_spread":0.18134373324685787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884478036","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012165854,0.008040379,0.11329101,0.1530263,0.0040910877,0.000116969015,0.0004891119,0.0002828428,0.7084964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8455981,0.004235753,0.03605012,0.025028436,0.010806032,0.0007578713,0.000313205,0.00047334397,0.07673723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98698634,0.006449657,0.0005045712,0.002465151,0.0028485458,0.00074582064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98534065,0.009178022,0.0007056206,0.0026490847,0.0016408175,0.00048577256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012133919,0.0008169817,0.0015648557,0.0027929845,0.0057939724,0.0098948255,0.0027338734,0.00921347,0.014642311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029351506,0.0009928411,0.0015853846,0.001940613,0.031087363,0.019440496,0.0061418163,0.013199225,0.0041140416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006922231,0.00000478427,0.000021777063,0.000020514139,0.0000033967963,0.0000066217576,0.00013848794,0.000032899636,0.00001475774,0.9972613,0.0016091564,0.000879285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011591103,0.000002644783,0.000032999706,0.00003880203,0.0000058095043,0.00002174445,0.00007112888,0.0001132299,0.00005424893,0.9867757,0.012867156,0.0000049830323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007942284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014642311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004630215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003670477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064171016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887841596","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12535","title":"Accidentally Doing the Right Thing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; University of Notre Dame; Florida State University; University of Michigan; University of Southern California","keywords":"Citation; Philosophy; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.29127516127989167,"score_gpt":0.3883605457535414,"score_spread":0.09708538447364973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887841596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11138026,0.0015357839,0.10228649,0.041675653,0.002306505,0.00008642476,0.00014956975,0.00025046355,0.7403288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93594193,0.000727019,0.0130567355,0.004810805,0.00042579297,0.00008944789,0.00008607379,0.0001545011,0.044707645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940329,0.0028300078,0.00024079015,0.001054897,0.0012598095,0.00058162434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939063,0.0019462567,0.00096883264,0.0017088018,0.0008748226,0.00059496757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005054796,0.00037087259,0.00032752965,0.00054623844,0.002650444,0.004130297,0.000586,0.0019043059,0.006772894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010982373,0.00023788172,0.0004979351,0.00033252625,0.018350985,0.0058489954,0.0035039296,0.0034492349,0.0017265191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019736148,0.000021138732,0.0014540629,0.00004635972,0.000018488308,0.00013326443,0.003376343,0.000099847486,0.0004300428,0.97939724,0.0040459954,0.010957498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010222735,0.000047435995,0.0014333703,0.00010506066,0.000024505956,0.00076479587,0.0038389484,0.0004014196,0.0012407383,0.8884977,0.103611164,0.000024566652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051586964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078260753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006772894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007952356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009754829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026732683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888535219","doi":"10.1111/rati.12201","title":"One standard to rule them all?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Irrational number; Doxastic logic; Rational agent; Permissive; Rationality; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.13433064359998698,"score_gpt":0.29985269255798613,"score_spread":0.16552204895799916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888535219","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08659977,0.00486634,0.5410292,0.20267893,0.0031808252,0.00033071593,0.00035151793,0.0008876283,0.16007504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86813897,0.0011530948,0.11284122,0.009438191,0.0014067577,0.00024060637,0.00010879994,0.000270938,0.0064015137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9632001,0.013671357,0.003560032,0.0063580414,0.012094479,0.0011159357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9019671,0.051065322,0.01092061,0.015872931,0.017254923,0.0029191293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052038345,0.0008924527,0.0018835927,0.0029437223,0.0026926398,0.009652332,0.004211942,0.0069313906,0.0039282977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13463517,0.00094181433,0.0011239038,0.0011614714,0.028792705,0.020800788,0.0069001154,0.014519421,0.0016385457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029944025,0.00003853332,0.0008239863,0.00008903594,0.00006271442,0.00007103792,0.0005000483,0.0005576971,0.0003915318,0.98292875,0.0027183695,0.0117884185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025893936,0.00002046977,0.00024503394,0.00011368661,0.000024860525,0.00007795183,0.0002980432,0.0012486044,0.0007607879,0.9897181,0.007439379,0.000027160846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015689207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016832672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052038345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031094947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053671636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27520835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888843569","doi":"10.5840/qd2018823","title":"Complexly Based Beliefs and the Generality Problem for Reliabilism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quaestiones Disputatae","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wycliffe College","funders":"","keywords":"Generality; Computer science; Psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.06604358357300329,"score_gpt":0.2885971400802377,"score_spread":0.2225535565072344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888843569","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16790588,0.006681104,0.54577196,0.057917144,0.00045787785,0.00017514621,0.00051936886,0.000525253,0.22004634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97490203,0.000500413,0.02075466,0.0006758015,0.0002771403,0.000108389744,0.00009020738,0.000077087774,0.002614224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914289,0.0040791095,0.00053956767,0.0018029939,0.001576847,0.0005725975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9620795,0.025322512,0.0015262405,0.008415785,0.0019221992,0.0007336714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012815789,0.0007286741,0.001680604,0.002870513,0.004331971,0.008099927,0.002800863,0.004356703,0.0070090275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03786848,0.0011965624,0.0020736114,0.0018979071,0.04293328,0.019670295,0.007731594,0.008538395,0.0006901737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008292115,0.0000055715564,0.00012367175,0.000021869973,0.000011150123,0.000020535223,0.00056244514,0.00048355374,0.000045042387,0.9969001,0.00021293254,0.0016048508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005170705,0.0000015375143,0.000042042488,0.0000064408673,0.0000026037233,0.000012616511,0.000041740543,0.0004862988,0.000026669017,0.9988888,0.00048217908,0.0000039830334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031351561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018346625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012815789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040777912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015542131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06777716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889157766","doi":"10.1086/699972","title":"The Science of Extraordinary Beliefs: An Introduction to This Issue","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.13464796545585672,"score_gpt":0.41029322234650056,"score_spread":0.27564525689064384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889157766","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038023284,0.19954962,0.0032792208,0.30951196,0.3526418,0.000084007384,0.00022892113,0.00012027961,0.13420397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007090058,0.20707844,0.0023331682,0.09425472,0.54117376,0.00017940062,0.00033879722,0.00025903925,0.14729266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979639,0.0005721259,0.00012253244,0.00023819864,0.00092634954,0.00017685576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922564,0.0050956607,0.00025563315,0.0003829878,0.0012099827,0.00079943327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002500507,0.0014968708,0.0011422449,0.0036555473,0.0032690258,0.009190337,0.0018196088,0.007493954,0.05032389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009463704,0.0006751479,0.0010748488,0.002915646,0.005585301,0.011551936,0.003959873,0.014232766,0.014682557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013193092,0.000057933474,0.00017731766,0.0002497034,0.000006733516,0.00006511573,0.00035433867,0.00005880506,0.000087829016,0.04471426,0.9057504,0.048464436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029075004,0.000009048665,0.00022716334,0.00052706664,0.0000024756248,0.000077180084,0.00020139782,0.000039536295,0.000025694144,0.017763292,0.98111373,0.000010437243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027472458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004559506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05032389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042333277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042127743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16835016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889204284","doi":"10.22215/etd/2018-12863","title":"Testimony - An Exploration of Our Trust in Others","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Psychology; Information source (mathematics); Content (measure theory); Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.16028495885810404,"score_gpt":0.34646264203559135,"score_spread":0.1861776831774873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889204284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.843543,0.0028446708,0.012086732,0.008991365,0.000114674,0.00012518677,0.00008366759,0.000024901476,0.13218592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972928,0.00062096014,0.0007836362,0.00021200471,0.000012916274,0.00002015008,0.000011990284,0.00000681464,0.0010386825],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96358335,0.030793581,0.00084564317,0.0007064973,0.003511638,0.00055930705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8673664,0.11453271,0.008433706,0.004269416,0.0041414904,0.0012562957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0233163,0.00024005964,0.00034132416,0.0020739944,0.004486678,0.008491131,0.000916298,0.0012933292,0.0029671325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067125395,0.0002930796,0.00035225286,0.0014268665,0.010830534,0.010057124,0.005474776,0.0026830747,0.00029648523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000836096,0.00006373805,0.013201927,0.00040728427,0.000053719108,0.00062010635,0.8908545,0.00012990538,0.0010753755,0.06742282,0.0011576607,0.024929494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019004698,0.00017804542,0.016590906,0.00090138376,0.000080925754,0.0014992434,0.89421237,0.000671853,0.0014503932,0.03448917,0.049853683,0.000052925072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019110544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019352805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0233163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026332089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019916357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12330985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891405385","doi":"10.1007/s11229-018-01942-8","title":"The explanatory role of consistency requirements","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rationality; Philosophy of science; Irrational number; Philosophy of language; Consistency (knowledge bases); Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0653998525236487,"score_gpt":0.28024314335405126,"score_spread":0.21484329083040254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891405385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08826677,0.0045054257,0.36790958,0.11973395,0.001845606,0.00030877796,0.0008996649,0.00040609488,0.41612408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955449,0.00069125806,0.036861558,0.0016228082,0.0005711645,0.00022078957,0.00028054308,0.00019704271,0.004105793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98019546,0.015000127,0.00083637825,0.0015593634,0.0018482619,0.00056026666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8608855,0.111185804,0.005679907,0.015889144,0.005510491,0.0008491563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023641296,0.0007931092,0.0008105573,0.0033197762,0.0028837207,0.008182011,0.0036755968,0.004729305,0.021689747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.124187484,0.000891297,0.0007498954,0.0028159758,0.018202275,0.025444169,0.004628635,0.005891303,0.0014399724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002280923,0.000011186211,0.0001975757,0.0000547321,0.000008454391,0.00003036262,0.0010695657,0.00024848303,0.00003926398,0.9947607,0.00072274805,0.0028342293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025583106,0.0000061269766,0.00027940466,0.00014699753,0.000016297006,0.000042941443,0.0010040124,0.0017092586,0.00020717346,0.98775464,0.0088001955,0.0000073860706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016001961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013894116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023641296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037243792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040843287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12502867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891769145","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-90983-7_13","title":"Mathematical Problem Choice and the Contact of Minds","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Society for the History and Philosophy of Mathematics, Société Canadienne d'Histoire et Philosophie des Mathématiques","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Testimonial; Beauty; Constraint (computer-aided design); Feeling; Argumentation theory; Psychology; Focus (optics); Computer science; Social psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Advertising; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05685487559235594,"score_gpt":0.2430773254667431,"score_spread":0.18622244987438716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891769145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08917408,0.009947568,0.080619,0.04084866,0.00037923196,0.00007284781,0.00025099548,0.00009483023,0.77861273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564027,0.0012752594,0.008870778,0.00061321823,0.00019417427,0.00007641463,0.00009910001,0.000053091986,0.03241519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597293,0.0024605105,0.00016123829,0.0005349323,0.00062028976,0.0002500997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892211,0.008454233,0.00037571645,0.00093953084,0.000634014,0.00037541738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036686899,0.00031476188,0.00054771366,0.0010169114,0.00207137,0.0073826835,0.0011135346,0.0027246263,0.021281889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022329284,0.0003499178,0.0005880279,0.001118165,0.01263623,0.009467836,0.0030433987,0.0030711067,0.0010876507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012468843,0.000007496143,0.00007249458,0.000014885074,0.0000030461654,0.000013621586,0.00062827684,0.0002662587,0.000036130205,0.9953862,0.00074298534,0.002816167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000097184075,0.0000032325142,0.000079452155,0.000015036166,0.000001603847,0.000015450656,0.00024613025,0.0006662133,0.00003358497,0.9908202,0.008106706,0.0000025918978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025291736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015616422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021281889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003373788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020435338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071195066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892164305","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5040","title":"Deep Disagreement and the Virtues of Argumentative and Epistemic Incapacity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Common sense; Resolution (logic); Philosophy; Point (geometry); Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04200780743109701,"score_gpt":0.262437827132096,"score_spread":0.220430019700999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892164305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13837416,0.0070002032,0.22417988,0.120573334,0.0010128516,0.00015445727,0.0001502813,0.00037796787,0.5081768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856608,0.00046028267,0.009157328,0.0016323917,0.00029989236,0.00011311803,0.000021592577,0.00007700455,0.0025776427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94844335,0.032537185,0.0027054716,0.004360497,0.008999517,0.0029539408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8904156,0.07979198,0.006412627,0.014964228,0.006191215,0.002224447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046702567,0.0007022868,0.0012931068,0.0036278304,0.0071231215,0.01608196,0.003118656,0.00892151,0.0040673823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0871528,0.0009730871,0.001202756,0.0022554658,0.08253251,0.029138485,0.016354451,0.0096946405,0.0007465606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018729475,0.000006748369,0.00014261964,0.000035836234,0.000010462829,0.00005698872,0.0032285526,0.00017421343,0.0000641231,0.9940519,0.0003640399,0.0018457737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011744032,0.000002879476,0.000046433,0.000029250792,0.0000036992956,0.000031519037,0.00041648405,0.00024673992,0.00006557733,0.99626285,0.002877449,0.0000055147625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009703472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006120122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046702567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004968484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00358331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24698973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895653417","doi":"","title":"Stanley and the Stakes Hypothesis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Riviste UNIMI (Università degli studi di Milano)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem; Universiteit van Tilburg; Universitat de Barcelona; Universität Potsdam; Queen's University; Sorbonne Université; University of Twente; Universiteit van Amsterdam; Oxford Brookes University; Durham University; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; University College Dublin; University of Bristol; Universität Zürich; Radboud Universiteit; Università degli Studi di Milano; University of Aberdeen; University of Leeds; Queen's University Belfast; University of St Andrews; Birkbeck, University of London; University of Central Lancashire; University College London","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.08294824667313556,"score_gpt":0.23830596985821798,"score_spread":0.1553577231850824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895653417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09996196,0.005109197,0.058523543,0.09620577,0.00096067705,0.00013665014,0.00014193586,0.00015448911,0.73880583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645024,0.0011340736,0.0069348696,0.006264218,0.0005357375,0.00011056511,0.00003612285,0.000060091315,0.02042197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98984516,0.0043387543,0.0005065312,0.0019028317,0.002723132,0.0006835563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812298,0.012646367,0.0019119743,0.0018253688,0.0015168644,0.00086952397],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010218792,0.00052943686,0.0007567378,0.0023473897,0.003730134,0.0064893914,0.0011606452,0.004157006,0.008182034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02146693,0.0005694059,0.0006506394,0.0013710343,0.034456518,0.01697536,0.0066225193,0.006791421,0.0010315876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011591037,0.000007818982,0.00016228826,0.00002604603,0.0000040243144,0.00007348481,0.00084996683,0.00009991588,0.00007917071,0.99504167,0.0011613517,0.002482712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016137092,0.000008991106,0.00028948166,0.00003898678,0.000004024079,0.000053503092,0.0003837076,0.0002432084,0.00017747645,0.98520887,0.013564855,0.0000107043015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015232023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013306253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037586086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00241067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054042757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895901617","doi":"10.14195/1984-249x_24_3","title":"Ὑπόκρισις. Da arte da atuação à arte do engano","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Archai","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Visual arts; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.10126680541161233,"score_gpt":0.3048473235331375,"score_spread":0.20358051812152517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895901617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03288882,0.009447445,0.028057545,0.03539206,0.001995901,0.000110893576,0.00022860117,0.00020470191,0.89167404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6634739,0.0064794035,0.011771132,0.0069999616,0.0009226302,0.00027130917,0.00016450523,0.0003271237,0.30958998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971539,0.0013675858,0.00008530181,0.00043954232,0.0006713258,0.00028230235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979215,0.00087225426,0.00020583051,0.00030894164,0.0005003397,0.00019114964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025023643,0.000715826,0.00033556967,0.0012625025,0.0045123966,0.009142433,0.000993378,0.00298764,0.021803148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041649686,0.00039215188,0.00050166703,0.0010975975,0.013579596,0.0063722506,0.0039579687,0.0049799443,0.004895479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023370745,0.000014825017,0.0005325093,0.0001134425,0.0000051137877,0.000113259375,0.014145668,0.00007258028,0.00061303866,0.9616675,0.0072780494,0.015420707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000151322765,0.000038000333,0.0014950711,0.00041863602,0.0000141368555,0.000265004,0.013582408,0.0002518059,0.0011644964,0.24116363,0.74155957,0.000032140175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056954585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075660013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021803148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046801497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034504083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0729388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897455137","doi":"","title":"On Difference-splitting and the Equal Weight View","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Triviality; Bayesian probability; Quarter (Canadian coin); Mathematical economics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Statistics; History; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.042116024476991365,"score_gpt":0.22224236074897746,"score_spread":0.1801263362719861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897455137","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064224854,0.0059981355,0.45039254,0.06239341,0.0011319156,0.000086680484,0.00020768595,0.00021223661,0.41535258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94016814,0.00097564684,0.036362242,0.0057265363,0.0006902779,0.00009612865,0.00006483414,0.00015685277,0.015759302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953686,0.0020183737,0.00018003865,0.0008166922,0.0012373469,0.00037897978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99262273,0.0041622543,0.000442105,0.0014971175,0.00090204383,0.00037379476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069352454,0.0005372103,0.00064659666,0.0011440265,0.0029597597,0.0037652794,0.002161212,0.0037631409,0.0063274945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015197909,0.00040613016,0.00089262455,0.0010354306,0.021661315,0.01341867,0.0039800806,0.008260734,0.000798405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004157485,0.0000020194404,0.000023497665,0.000004689339,0.0000013342329,0.000005764439,0.00016643989,0.00016147023,0.00002218972,0.99820113,0.00027409208,0.001133218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035454595,0.0000025065424,0.000025435114,0.000005184912,0.0000011295673,0.0000071207264,0.000039814786,0.00054067397,0.000027648499,0.99739814,0.0019463856,0.000002366511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034063351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018487613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069352454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038775285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011039617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03667748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899197228","doi":"10.1007/s11098-018-1189-1","title":"Just too different: normative properties and natural properties","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; York University","keywords":"Normative; Naturalism; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Intuition; Philosophy; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of language; Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.30702692484156197,"score_gpt":0.31216995413700294,"score_spread":0.005143029295440971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899197228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18069483,0.0055447053,0.23778646,0.08700624,0.0015714717,0.00016522472,0.0004406404,0.0001917408,0.4865986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977949,0.0005347096,0.015115721,0.0024593393,0.00041415534,0.00017870212,0.00011774331,0.000092037364,0.00313841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98646903,0.008231882,0.0008136176,0.0020178042,0.0016612897,0.0008063234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9549045,0.03243846,0.0024473926,0.005936803,0.0029405903,0.0013322915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013143784,0.0005614137,0.0013597155,0.002378522,0.006004945,0.009246344,0.0017673621,0.004605922,0.007149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036787797,0.00063768,0.0013874553,0.0015837952,0.043025237,0.024274345,0.004516001,0.0071877013,0.00044208107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058023047,0.000009292471,0.00012261506,0.000014831436,0.000005771917,0.000015352796,0.00027473547,0.00006436114,0.000032873988,0.9986082,0.00019289946,0.0006533242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054110087,0.0000023947127,0.00006791396,0.0000119992155,0.0000036006709,0.000019832496,0.00022962643,0.00018758353,0.000045433506,0.99813277,0.00129022,0.000003144526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015049222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013751718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013143784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029458727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027808947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06951177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901566063","doi":"10.7202/1070737ar","title":"The Epistemic Goods of Higher Education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"University education; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Position (finance); Sociology; Economic Justice; Higher education; Distribution (mathematics); Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.17440107205352323,"score_gpt":0.35883219898788604,"score_spread":0.1844311269343628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901566063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04711379,0.0063844062,0.06922599,0.05086196,0.000520817,0.00006189459,0.00013077095,0.00011102007,0.8255893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98101175,0.0012101377,0.004339184,0.0017868513,0.00042931281,0.00006331857,0.000030081037,0.00003649406,0.011092867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98801756,0.0066289916,0.00045081394,0.00086828275,0.0027349573,0.0012992613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781321,0.013102452,0.001685662,0.0035377212,0.0020453604,0.0014967531],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010924512,0.0005255032,0.00062342425,0.0037990964,0.005888188,0.01657516,0.0010864255,0.004069956,0.008723887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020807682,0.00039922568,0.0005631912,0.0029119886,0.034997284,0.018121865,0.010037712,0.004113747,0.00093034527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042646493,0.0000046630407,0.00011299022,0.000016468577,0.0000025583151,0.000010056706,0.00087288726,0.000098100034,0.000016778184,0.9968369,0.00029327758,0.0017309578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052953887,0.0000061826295,0.00022982246,0.00007675224,0.000004007693,0.00002169406,0.0009311641,0.00017796755,0.0000686486,0.97836214,0.020110387,0.000005900125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020387443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015370204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99411184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071089584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004086653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05777508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902641480","doi":"10.1016/j.jvir.2018.05.020","title":"Why Do We Believe What We Believe?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Radiology; Interventional radiology; Purchasing; Medical physics; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.046507984790370036,"score_gpt":0.28920517033938764,"score_spread":0.2426971855490176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902641480","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0157112,0.01863184,0.018754411,0.88430905,0.0052099396,0.000043181164,0.000111654466,0.00008140422,0.057147406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8172891,0.013097153,0.01463274,0.14168437,0.0055508614,0.0002189583,0.00014331617,0.00029899293,0.007084375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9715559,0.018163115,0.0010733306,0.0020022243,0.005251937,0.0019535257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9154481,0.052336786,0.0077735637,0.0053388136,0.01359227,0.005510487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029030241,0.0006525332,0.0011598223,0.0027220182,0.007534384,0.013682474,0.002369528,0.011108501,0.0056111375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09896083,0.000678929,0.00066854525,0.0014706418,0.07927269,0.020035889,0.004287306,0.0175798,0.0022156094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058060898,0.00008818193,0.0029114822,0.00046316744,0.00011354207,0.0002758003,0.034668047,0.00021146463,0.00026776796,0.9074164,0.03427829,0.019247806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044176715,0.000020192847,0.0007438596,0.00064391526,0.000032508135,0.00021659002,0.017416693,0.00021949303,0.00023017792,0.9201443,0.060235947,0.000052086256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058577135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004862823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029030241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051120073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009840671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15352845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905498512","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i4.5065","title":"Two Types of Argument from Position to Know","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Position (finance); Point (geometry); Cognition; Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04554174471056073,"score_gpt":0.28244212796945395,"score_spread":0.23690038325889323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905498512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015569014,0.0023592438,0.23286483,0.09699934,0.0032508622,0.00039004412,0.0003573867,0.00023703171,0.6479723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75260293,0.0026112327,0.10474763,0.035976376,0.004553658,0.0020821597,0.0007450825,0.0005237997,0.09615711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798779,0.0083211195,0.0008739837,0.0026788826,0.0065595745,0.0016885949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9411531,0.044600148,0.00249249,0.0051794006,0.004924716,0.0016500091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019223288,0.001147818,0.0013281343,0.005487528,0.0041346005,0.009598018,0.0053055324,0.0147063695,0.024034766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07360316,0.0009766816,0.0025438343,0.002996794,0.024396358,0.03289958,0.013631878,0.01367289,0.004194326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001771362,0.00001817801,0.00009087628,0.00005971868,0.0000060643756,0.000055902103,0.0006256295,0.000042316122,0.000048117654,0.995538,0.0013413344,0.0021561547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005054039,0.000024611038,0.00016438033,0.00018258046,0.000016440641,0.00016047279,0.00081787136,0.0005024452,0.0003910964,0.9689326,0.028739344,0.000017554816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004419382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042736085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024034766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038987412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023507567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10166365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907551885","doi":"10.1007/s13194-018-0240-6","title":"Understanding does not depend on (causal) explanation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognitive science; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.27557985721054296,"score_gpt":0.304684522003964,"score_spread":0.029104664793421053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907551885","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07400662,0.002221551,0.4973584,0.060561404,0.0005211393,0.0001301419,0.0004923758,0.000535663,0.36417267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580048,0.0007095863,0.031131549,0.0023267649,0.00021408562,0.00015554072,0.0002830108,0.00013727952,0.0070374175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905743,0.004012116,0.00056369853,0.0020323526,0.0018890714,0.00092851225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97284794,0.015204938,0.0018261931,0.007469166,0.0018580941,0.0007936049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010137582,0.0006978143,0.0015315252,0.0023067894,0.002822476,0.0061102756,0.0020823486,0.005917671,0.009095006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030611683,0.0008531429,0.0020385522,0.001089527,0.023467693,0.030414369,0.008184654,0.006962846,0.0013645757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011777381,0.000008506658,0.0003290467,0.000044330445,0.000014539836,0.000044445078,0.0007114991,0.00051782804,0.00008742058,0.99523085,0.00045255985,0.0025471018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006392531,0.0000059095655,0.00015729362,0.000032857406,0.000011822835,0.00006142465,0.00021093183,0.0011051479,0.0001115299,0.9944654,0.0038248822,0.0000063427237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023727561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001638048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010137582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025925953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002800265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053613305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908879543","doi":"","title":"Fundamental Problems of Epistemology, Symposium in Honour of Brian Grant","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Epistemology; Skepticism; Pragmatism; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of mind; Interpretation (philosophy); Linguistics","score_opus":0.05995603944548294,"score_gpt":0.26472231430440757,"score_spread":0.20476627485892462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908879543","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00084220705,0.19142438,0.0021651192,0.7514278,0.035104807,0.000016617696,0.000091729074,0.000058816328,0.018868413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12785211,0.25628847,0.009674588,0.3112229,0.17167673,0.00025413686,0.00026720297,0.00083626335,0.12192759],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563074,0.0023592266,0.00017941785,0.0007675432,0.00085836166,0.00020474769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909135,0.006671964,0.00025934645,0.00033154569,0.0011981942,0.00062541105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006675707,0.0014858504,0.0015621032,0.002010833,0.006463658,0.0091574695,0.00272112,0.0054051233,0.0062966174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016674733,0.0009024664,0.0009344719,0.001883444,0.016000075,0.015501027,0.0042366073,0.016609143,0.002977138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003991716,0.000028639759,0.00015243738,0.00015330133,0.00002883822,0.00013220291,0.0025859661,0.00022074822,0.00011486624,0.13596305,0.84687215,0.013707898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032929896,0.000012333072,0.0002627927,0.0005584821,0.000010892557,0.00009835581,0.0021122925,0.00039023542,0.00010072869,0.17777696,0.8186102,0.000033833843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028458603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042355657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028458603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007173611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004136739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056585908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912804059","doi":"10.1111/rati.12228","title":"Excuses, exemptions, and derivative norms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Excellence; Focus (optics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036950695592575036,"score_gpt":0.2428804490552681,"score_spread":0.20592975346269304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912804059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20209876,0.0026231052,0.22191112,0.025789017,0.0006130979,0.00011055581,0.00013301751,0.00017603666,0.5465452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974189,0.00030324297,0.01587424,0.0008690248,0.0001869177,0.000099134915,0.00004381413,0.00004550525,0.008389059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97938776,0.010819963,0.0014005131,0.0023044723,0.0052067735,0.0008804751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9679976,0.019277342,0.0025319892,0.0048778527,0.003922668,0.0013925271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013677437,0.00042244003,0.00070562237,0.0020518582,0.0033791682,0.0062533165,0.0014335485,0.0033773344,0.004532959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03545492,0.0003735174,0.0005170977,0.0009922675,0.034008775,0.012948537,0.0069017685,0.0053864093,0.0005363321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005741545,0.0000041865424,0.00007924628,0.000006516753,0.0000010111703,0.000015290023,0.0002952142,0.000098089964,0.000059658258,0.9981128,0.00013422352,0.001188042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004948808,0.000006061845,0.00009084027,0.000020342093,0.0000017344437,0.000032064378,0.0002086625,0.0004627215,0.00014907459,0.99472505,0.0042923624,0.000006151917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011071734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001009146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013677437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025849778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022554486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07233405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922307189","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i1.5719","title":"You Will Respect My Authoritah!? A Reply to Botting","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Appeal; Epistemology; Defeasible estate; Empirical evidence; Empirical research; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.05664282117680272,"score_gpt":0.27781461651055406,"score_spread":0.22117179533375134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922307189","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027692597,0.001486269,0.0004828698,0.9865997,0.0087895375,0.0000039335096,0.000020051364,0.000036895755,0.0023037803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011135107,0.0010389792,0.00068504515,0.9690856,0.010581055,0.000028754168,0.000015863363,0.000085723834,0.007343874],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98979235,0.003866129,0.0008954098,0.0025357266,0.002199386,0.0007109906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.948587,0.038732056,0.0017576066,0.0022825345,0.006698194,0.0019425917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01289518,0.0012728603,0.0016788427,0.0017071838,0.00947827,0.010460085,0.0037633984,0.04059538,0.010072898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06580681,0.0008874138,0.0012841809,0.0024500135,0.016356293,0.018506153,0.004469596,0.04578854,0.0063661216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003766997,0.0000146582215,0.000259292,0.00005909134,0.000008911407,0.00018686969,0.0016038973,0.000047754696,0.00011398445,0.057877626,0.9349846,0.0048056548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003421748,0.000032125714,0.0007382564,0.00029490405,0.000021907079,0.00047828475,0.0028029045,0.000396141,0.00047388818,0.07224018,0.9223297,0.00015763353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007804389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0079159485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04059538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072993594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004364031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06819707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922599164","doi":"10.1007/s12136-019-00383-3","title":"A Puzzle About Knowledge, Blame, and Coherence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Cegep Edouard Montpetit","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Deontic logic; Epistemology; Norm (philosophy); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Belief revision; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03447358632831219,"score_gpt":0.2694467857178974,"score_spread":0.2349731993895852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922599164","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08275637,0.013400559,0.107069544,0.5615536,0.0012639799,0.00007332186,0.000246964,0.0001885562,0.23344712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731242,0.0014352546,0.012492533,0.0072705415,0.0007120984,0.000084172054,0.00006394641,0.00013786687,0.004679489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98302644,0.011038725,0.0007022411,0.0021663262,0.0022996084,0.000766497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9337676,0.05015248,0.0030342382,0.007821916,0.0040627075,0.0011610754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021708393,0.00061578956,0.0016864246,0.0025693474,0.01004349,0.013151661,0.002905443,0.00989534,0.006919359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06758621,0.0009839119,0.0008250904,0.0022619867,0.11069505,0.04206891,0.007452964,0.012888505,0.0009706874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016214111,0.000011322966,0.00019404094,0.000037580412,0.000010208874,0.000026623911,0.00665435,0.00015638134,0.00003680858,0.9876752,0.0018250613,0.0033562316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008067032,0.000002785513,0.000078153724,0.00004914984,0.0000030296756,0.000018174223,0.001890965,0.00017015343,0.000031801017,0.9933258,0.004415025,0.0000068734457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065586264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004461951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021708393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058138655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00838251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114806354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2931378986","doi":"10.4324/9781315712550-26","title":"Virtue Epistemology and Abilism on Knowledge","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Canada Research Chairs; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Epistemology; Virtue; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.06871299612366548,"score_gpt":0.27210033532031197,"score_spread":0.20338733919664648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2931378986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007260419,0.008916128,0.015888609,0.0136960475,0.0005984133,0.000023593697,0.000041660307,0.00004295529,0.9535322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79455656,0.011248908,0.015730785,0.0077737872,0.002355391,0.00025412082,0.00014403221,0.0001390368,0.16779736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973966,0.001377834,0.0000656995,0.0002409239,0.0006802434,0.0002387148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978174,0.0014041242,0.000117945005,0.00024973814,0.00026086837,0.00014983125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002816723,0.00043229447,0.0004600609,0.0017818714,0.0035549828,0.0050606946,0.00070857024,0.0022739635,0.0047853645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003134304,0.0002566421,0.00043141638,0.0013590999,0.032044817,0.007404955,0.003780356,0.0044802167,0.0016018676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011884332,0.0000019089343,0.000017267108,0.00000813615,4.283434e-7,0.000008403918,0.00033328307,0.000027447542,0.000009157067,0.9976254,0.0008211733,0.0011462383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023600028,0.000002883921,0.000054874243,0.00003662657,6.8127326e-7,0.000021048421,0.00015310373,0.000113812945,0.0000215389,0.97243154,0.027159581,0.0000018602494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020559828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018270584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050606946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041894433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027411557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0303967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942284900","doi":"10.1111/rati.12235","title":"Secondary self‐deception","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Self-deception; Doxastic logic; Phenomenon; Misrepresentation; Epistemology; Psychology; Sketch; Self-knowledge; Lying; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.028600403830870574,"score_gpt":0.23732171294123675,"score_spread":0.20872130911036618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942284900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06682458,0.0037160062,0.2030107,0.026123008,0.000951557,0.00014479211,0.00022373142,0.00021336369,0.6987922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674997,0.0006729452,0.0056734807,0.0016412768,0.00027272105,0.0000698803,0.00005286475,0.000043706288,0.0240734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99552035,0.0019362725,0.000286094,0.00066941924,0.0012498611,0.00033791678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98871547,0.004354521,0.0014400457,0.0032066822,0.0019266175,0.0003566723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004503762,0.00048435273,0.00037430503,0.0009040237,0.0017643126,0.0042229146,0.0011505476,0.0024748647,0.008371966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013133862,0.00022700701,0.00035848023,0.0004467342,0.020876111,0.006439115,0.0043288604,0.005985991,0.0012777093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008855791,0.000011146744,0.0002123048,0.000053846412,0.00000453628,0.000078239376,0.002952771,0.00015735366,0.00024330794,0.9913011,0.001037675,0.0039389473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008488143,0.000028966324,0.0005515039,0.00025390397,0.000008558143,0.00032457782,0.0013667255,0.0016487659,0.0016981153,0.94443226,0.04966306,0.000015145249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010853601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005995361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008371966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024989792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014394979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02800703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945461406","doi":"10.5840/eps201956231","title":"Epistemic Progress Despite Systematic Disagreement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Epistemology & Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Domain (mathematical analysis); Philosophy of medicine; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.04281006697869233,"score_gpt":0.27121869457112674,"score_spread":0.2284086275924344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945461406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13410081,0.0063095293,0.22791481,0.17560583,0.0015787452,0.00026142286,0.00043448008,0.00047592912,0.4533185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706322,0.00091279496,0.018097358,0.003995572,0.00056204776,0.00019965919,0.00012216788,0.0001017957,0.0053765588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9498871,0.027200516,0.003059296,0.008132301,0.009095993,0.0026248249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83754283,0.0996904,0.009895184,0.033963636,0.01585711,0.003050784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.068833075,0.0006711787,0.001491459,0.0035477674,0.0073930062,0.009812522,0.002315114,0.0070194355,0.0057520107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15989092,0.0008016641,0.0012555867,0.002125845,0.04475157,0.029541546,0.017023655,0.009709687,0.00095702073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027488846,0.000013356043,0.0006452405,0.00006414625,0.000026158468,0.00008024555,0.0033707495,0.0005616837,0.00011938993,0.98892456,0.0011760652,0.004990815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013383935,0.0000071599425,0.00012764311,0.000054276323,0.0000072931425,0.000025921347,0.00038496614,0.00045579148,0.00011658139,0.9934708,0.0053286054,0.0000075562207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012461565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007728294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068833075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053178244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005862856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36402845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945477073","doi":"10.7202/1059498ar","title":"SELF-DECEPTIVE RESISTANCE TO SELF-KNOWLEDGE","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Self-deception; Deception; Resistance (ecology); Confusion; Epistemology; Psychology; Phenomenon; Social psychology; Focus (optics); Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.033281223257821214,"score_gpt":0.28707770136782557,"score_spread":0.25379647811000433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945477073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2644316,0.004534573,0.1264611,0.070946164,0.00049826456,0.00006975337,0.00007373441,0.00015306211,0.5328317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904461,0.00047370556,0.0030966643,0.0010922434,0.00010076342,0.000028300916,0.000013961791,0.00002270588,0.004725543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98688066,0.007386714,0.0006218034,0.0012809678,0.0030202244,0.0008096997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9554923,0.027325459,0.004240925,0.008529998,0.003586593,0.0008246655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00992714,0.0002634824,0.00050004025,0.0010096317,0.002108628,0.006708348,0.0012153907,0.0036889727,0.0025231661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04061675,0.00025553725,0.00045827508,0.0006563456,0.039287295,0.012199142,0.005014629,0.0076806005,0.00048196592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011855008,0.000012258419,0.00057098625,0.000038803886,0.000007004214,0.00008769119,0.009618927,0.0002180267,0.00024744874,0.9841069,0.00049658254,0.0045835297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009296458,0.000028636581,0.0010552628,0.00010920115,0.000009198909,0.00027598598,0.0042480356,0.001427128,0.0007769408,0.9700557,0.021986641,0.000017869253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094259763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006965137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00992714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027255542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015512938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052500367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945850595","doi":"10.7202/1059501ar","title":"COSTLY FALSE BELIEFS: WHAT SELF-DECEPTION AND PRAGMATIC ENCROACHMENT CAN TELL US ABOUT THE RATIONALITY OF BELIEFS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Fribourg; Universität Basel; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Irrationality; Rationality; Dilemma; Irrational number; Deception; Self-deception; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03376995306588552,"score_gpt":0.2698096644149186,"score_spread":0.2360397113490331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945850595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31391412,0.017216574,0.21239902,0.18868625,0.0012078229,0.00016836156,0.00039178703,0.00019254413,0.26582354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987165,0.0016075798,0.006695617,0.002592103,0.00025275876,0.000060764818,0.000051438103,0.000029175972,0.0015455645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842435,0.008407963,0.00079650944,0.0015741286,0.003437449,0.0015403983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91209185,0.06565303,0.008976223,0.009246068,0.0030397736,0.0009931226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018826963,0.0007197751,0.0013215925,0.0021742242,0.0029008451,0.008529176,0.0021199358,0.009660527,0.0048253415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07452972,0.00060166273,0.0013624642,0.0011421639,0.042293947,0.030198243,0.004295409,0.007453098,0.0006482213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014139205,0.00004215521,0.0038671477,0.00024159186,0.000084766616,0.00063458964,0.009163124,0.0009227103,0.00033173803,0.97009486,0.0011258754,0.013350123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000249106,0.000027016615,0.0014993381,0.00016123228,0.000029858558,0.00039637674,0.0021390202,0.0012626172,0.0003822318,0.98972183,0.0043215044,0.000034026612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019485395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011120914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018826963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002319633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014490996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09956765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947594774","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v44i3.52236","title":"A Mindful Approach to Teacher Education: An Interview With William Hare","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Pedagogy; Teacher education; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Sociology; Applied psychology","score_opus":0.08741101982629987,"score_gpt":0.3300629314067518,"score_spread":0.24265191158045193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947594774","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38209647,0.014435087,0.007205477,0.55639917,0.0041982145,0.00036161047,0.00008599393,0.00015285391,0.035064988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8924888,0.0053787953,0.0034279816,0.076080956,0.00044030324,0.00033565785,0.000033800694,0.00010831871,0.021705488],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97937715,0.015443371,0.00044035225,0.00081782456,0.002165082,0.0017562126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976363,0.012776456,0.0015444981,0.00050002267,0.002588876,0.0062271035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01331841,0.00053073204,0.0012921484,0.0016609953,0.03034106,0.008544771,0.0019950941,0.007246925,0.0016668377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031625953,0.0016110314,0.00046628682,0.0018403323,0.022795487,0.008047856,0.0068631056,0.022701893,0.00041004017],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002534598,0.00009975397,0.0012621561,0.000064255815,0.0000050165927,0.003099116,0.9578675,0.00007763173,0.0011694408,0.008336044,0.023661971,0.0043318695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005871229,0.00007107471,0.0014193391,0.000306265,0.0000034927325,0.0022301332,0.80867624,0.00014794493,0.0002471584,0.0024375103,0.18438,0.00007493739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041471757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047410723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041471757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0088352375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009230063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0824607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948887261","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i2.4940","title":"The Appraisal of Conductions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Inference; Dimension (graph theory); Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Balance (ability); Epistemology; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics; Pure mathematics; Medicine; Internal medicine; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.07020105457511219,"score_gpt":0.29186607081554206,"score_spread":0.22166501624042986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948887261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07852388,0.004020423,0.33909932,0.05160896,0.0022725349,0.00030495317,0.00033987605,0.0005167751,0.5233133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95884323,0.0008989737,0.025946047,0.002033007,0.0012686619,0.00018589731,0.00011519259,0.00026775646,0.010441289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9713212,0.013284617,0.001735658,0.0031505954,0.008620254,0.0018875621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91098315,0.060855016,0.0052549015,0.0075218086,0.013147462,0.0022375947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030757895,0.00089389866,0.0011673248,0.0058932723,0.004325559,0.0115477815,0.0024072828,0.005732815,0.010589521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11315132,0.00063219713,0.0015482435,0.0025217624,0.033265453,0.027696114,0.008529906,0.009023921,0.0015314587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026354302,0.0000055008672,0.00025468122,0.000064948574,0.000007742737,0.000063727224,0.0015978682,0.0002448379,0.0001450402,0.9918609,0.00084320985,0.0048851795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008747176,0.000015304937,0.0002999848,0.000117791984,0.000010705171,0.000067170215,0.0011526822,0.0011778845,0.00021233619,0.9868715,0.010054482,0.000011470697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010450438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080890715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030757895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005280044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031945654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16266519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953614120","doi":"10.1002/tht3.417","title":"Knowledge from Falsehood","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Premise; Verdict; Epistemology; Simple (philosophy); Extension (predicate logic); Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07153808595598073,"score_gpt":0.27900952413600877,"score_spread":0.20747143818002806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953614120","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12365752,0.008693379,0.52885675,0.10845254,0.0020710563,0.00021195045,0.00068774883,0.0005293855,0.22683969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489281,0.0019627875,0.034715775,0.008952807,0.0010630159,0.00016406718,0.00023857226,0.00013374948,0.0038410446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752008,0.014642246,0.0013323579,0.003993918,0.003847603,0.0009829884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8935657,0.08510692,0.00399737,0.011888438,0.004514589,0.00092706026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022739502,0.0009704049,0.0013827059,0.002347238,0.0038112518,0.005862231,0.002377723,0.0061284425,0.0075467667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09363789,0.0011023601,0.0019299974,0.0011411133,0.04573201,0.031717125,0.006989709,0.0106120575,0.0009158485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010430964,0.000020857511,0.001268151,0.0002557365,0.000066796885,0.00039138022,0.004507257,0.00062483683,0.00034932207,0.97689223,0.0026736446,0.012845413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016409402,0.0000114246,0.0002732405,0.00007428995,0.000017221293,0.00023554265,0.00034337817,0.0007150052,0.00034288925,0.9919532,0.0060026417,0.000014648047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017021382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077572354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022739502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034825671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017512068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120259404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954376322","doi":"10.1163/22105700-20191358","title":"Disagreement, Deep Time, and Progress in Philosophy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Study of Skepticism","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Convergence (economics); Philosophy of science; Economics","score_opus":0.046373980003366636,"score_gpt":0.315932148819268,"score_spread":0.2695581688159014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954376322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.201289,0.02527617,0.0881586,0.18934444,0.0015987466,0.00012889695,0.00012182821,0.00016544179,0.49391687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98400486,0.0019337666,0.0052575003,0.0018963786,0.0003288996,0.000054117754,0.000023220682,0.000044570766,0.0064567016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97540194,0.016528096,0.0010055954,0.0020133553,0.0037585746,0.0012924692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96316504,0.025327986,0.003559923,0.002802983,0.0032720945,0.0018719159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027123759,0.0005065944,0.0008720563,0.002753077,0.007062802,0.013048217,0.0017226827,0.0050752074,0.0035468878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042360708,0.00041813392,0.00067625457,0.002391393,0.074465945,0.028027518,0.014164101,0.01015248,0.0005127589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002439651,0.000012834839,0.0003294429,0.00004152029,0.0000060129814,0.000038157013,0.013571778,0.00029590738,0.000063657426,0.9808626,0.00053128204,0.0042224242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010775057,0.000007961874,0.00013228183,0.000051168925,0.000002837232,0.000019923518,0.002568923,0.00028130406,0.000051728162,0.98989165,0.006975013,0.000006396399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017642338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083303184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027123759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008115331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046014995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14344591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2960241565","doi":"10.1017/epi.2019.19","title":"A Defense of Intrapersonal Belief Permissivism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Intrapersonal communication; Proposition; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication","score_opus":0.03800906982054655,"score_gpt":0.2420789842637067,"score_spread":0.20406991444316014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2960241565","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13600416,0.0019459762,0.31853813,0.09604033,0.0006714351,0.0001397495,0.00019292826,0.00024285345,0.4462244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863833,0.00023128344,0.007966608,0.0022654887,0.00028367236,0.00009757453,0.000028723789,0.000027423175,0.0027158759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854092,0.0077390843,0.0006189885,0.0020041778,0.003168715,0.0010598259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97832894,0.011485693,0.0023611172,0.004246563,0.0023978683,0.0011798517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014975159,0.0006803157,0.0007739895,0.001982034,0.0032458955,0.005866064,0.0029302253,0.0048760907,0.0064325472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023780348,0.0005823011,0.0010663052,0.001261792,0.028997755,0.009575978,0.010242214,0.010737711,0.0008319324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012206162,0.000013504678,0.00025416535,0.000019145535,0.000009240021,0.000060656323,0.0009315305,0.000198988,0.00007777819,0.99639255,0.0003409082,0.0016891783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009624287,0.00000867499,0.00016538738,0.000031224827,0.0000045736483,0.00005834116,0.00033533628,0.00085283286,0.00013845069,0.9957054,0.0026846877,0.0000055148475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009273408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057727494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014975159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033124038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023912385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07919717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963008078","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199385195.013.17","title":"Virtue Epistemology and the Democratic Life","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Democracy; Epistemic virtue; Flourishing; Epistemology; Eudaimonia; Sociology; Humility; Virtue ethics; Autonomy; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04882605168476949,"score_gpt":0.22202326192059865,"score_spread":0.17319721023582915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963008078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012380749,0.015823415,0.013745137,0.033935197,0.00063834863,0.000032871798,0.000026374115,0.000050055434,0.9233679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86584496,0.008741425,0.008880751,0.0065472247,0.00096993183,0.00021738687,0.000055778524,0.00009357159,0.10864909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972029,0.0017276838,0.00006958702,0.0002183619,0.0005164032,0.00026513444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998408,0.00086798286,0.00012238046,0.00022516468,0.00015302855,0.00022347465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031427133,0.00032266777,0.00038575256,0.0010630742,0.0051142704,0.0065345177,0.00049061904,0.0021036922,0.0031370048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024946064,0.00023032195,0.00036217688,0.00073669315,0.040356275,0.005950652,0.004634724,0.00499334,0.00082195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011130775,0.000003752666,0.000023241146,0.000007811709,5.9323156e-7,0.000008578576,0.0010045156,0.000041808737,0.000017694932,0.9955752,0.0011190252,0.0021966523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040551804,0.0000041083454,0.000086313594,0.000045275516,6.870778e-7,0.000031199623,0.0006053482,0.00010764492,0.000039902417,0.93106884,0.06800342,0.0000032574624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001024874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015438742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065345177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004519634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00455019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03279233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963407655","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190675233.013.24","title":"Assertion of Knowledge","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Pragmatics; Epistemology; Semantics (computer science); Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy of science; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11374037914745189,"score_gpt":0.3056375601450385,"score_spread":0.19189718099758662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963407655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007988534,0.0043570492,0.10236826,0.014311256,0.0017687143,0.00017803226,0.0011758576,0.00047856104,0.8673738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72609586,0.0104045905,0.0648278,0.005050277,0.0027845365,0.0004426455,0.003257529,0.0006170389,0.18651973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98948973,0.004167921,0.0010068942,0.0018646827,0.0029246132,0.00054615916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844631,0.007504446,0.00095912634,0.003951272,0.002715325,0.00040679314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008274743,0.0005453866,0.0006198962,0.0030205145,0.0029816662,0.012235857,0.0025244746,0.0032122433,0.027068486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02575185,0.000436459,0.0006832477,0.0026936196,0.01649998,0.020178642,0.0063474607,0.0030404255,0.009852154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000108567465,0.000006673037,0.0001412959,0.00010085672,0.000005805115,0.00008730986,0.003474326,0.00006086875,0.00014248356,0.97686607,0.0056871586,0.013416263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070554966,0.000016690288,0.0002955028,0.00043451905,0.000015004544,0.00036642482,0.0027436574,0.0003683638,0.00061260065,0.59074,0.40437952,0.000020652451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027701803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017011977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027068486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028090482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039046488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090553164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967973863","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-34503-7_6","title":"Disagreement and Change of View","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Humility; Scope (computer science); Irrational number; Worry; Context (archaeology); License; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Theology; History","score_opus":0.306624217954912,"score_gpt":0.3563655715107863,"score_spread":0.04974135355587428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967973863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0854669,0.0054677413,0.035338376,0.18830821,0.0032202504,0.00010839703,0.00011698938,0.000086088156,0.68188703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96341735,0.00078333064,0.0039001952,0.007993059,0.0007158184,0.0001223746,0.00007461271,0.00013758158,0.02285565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9497925,0.033363067,0.0011635128,0.0056290994,0.0075432924,0.0025084827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9479767,0.03421858,0.0024489262,0.0075920396,0.0057242564,0.0020395326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036877345,0.000394747,0.0009605446,0.003120842,0.008717101,0.017053708,0.003015094,0.008523617,0.008111673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08444098,0.00045560178,0.00078233465,0.0021204855,0.06233834,0.021272842,0.012518862,0.0130878715,0.0011036462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016335172,0.000011024969,0.00023728027,0.00002138043,0.000007869037,0.00006592845,0.025351265,0.00005027549,0.00007406881,0.96564263,0.0038653852,0.004656521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017483915,0.000008731005,0.00034020902,0.00012524355,0.000008526376,0.00007721758,0.020376598,0.0002904583,0.00015714334,0.900904,0.07767908,0.000015398571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017652839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015863691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036877345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007991736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005077943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19502836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968537301","doi":"","title":"Peer idealization, internal examples, and the meta-philosophy of genius in the epistemology of disagreement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brock University Digital Repository (Brock University)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Idealization; Epistemology; Genius; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Social epistemology; Psychology","score_opus":0.036255291160360824,"score_gpt":0.20527953434531396,"score_spread":0.16902424318495313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968537301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14964953,0.0044368114,0.17509277,0.09423559,0.0012952643,0.00016558413,0.000113237125,0.00021778187,0.57479346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98460084,0.00048911996,0.009603058,0.00069127907,0.0001297852,0.00007880576,0.000034166875,0.00008306364,0.0042899027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9714337,0.02272866,0.00080116524,0.0013825215,0.0027400253,0.00091395696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.957801,0.029834867,0.0022192174,0.0043769386,0.004592166,0.0011758411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030939909,0.00051375665,0.0010139188,0.0035114132,0.0095934,0.012032283,0.0023033603,0.0038690069,0.006442984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057795253,0.00053948787,0.000711167,0.0027610732,0.06759971,0.023654012,0.011243066,0.0064468593,0.00056690467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010816713,0.0000048764878,0.00015522927,0.000026952686,0.00000322145,0.000029535862,0.01064097,0.00010376476,0.000033807562,0.98580766,0.0006539779,0.0025292484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011767639,0.0000059103895,0.00016532849,0.00010669544,0.000008118164,0.00005323441,0.007811491,0.00081740797,0.0001303248,0.9806167,0.010261495,0.000011517207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005147585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053016003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030939909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008593058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00599334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1636278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969530177","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000295","title":"Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present DIEGO E. MACHUCA et BARON REED, DIR. Londres, Bloomsbury Academic, 2018, xvi + 746 p.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Content (measure theory); Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.060664613508670584,"score_gpt":0.28904848990148463,"score_spread":0.22838387639281404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969530177","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026857643,0.26001662,0.0019006837,0.6308741,0.00859459,0.0000073403567,0.000043324526,0.000060492897,0.09581713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45038238,0.2836164,0.0036443206,0.14918815,0.020519331,0.00012728761,0.0001067559,0.00072905107,0.09168628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98949045,0.007853239,0.00022357491,0.0006080628,0.0013739789,0.00045072348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843204,0.012037289,0.00071104756,0.00089052756,0.0013669186,0.0006737747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013380337,0.0006019223,0.00081300666,0.0015172029,0.0074521387,0.012465433,0.0012415964,0.0068278247,0.0077513917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020019941,0.00047879654,0.0003383842,0.0017220377,0.04041225,0.015472485,0.0049166186,0.013041426,0.0022931318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004621907,0.000015625805,0.00015850826,0.0002689826,0.000009713355,0.00016421656,0.039913308,0.00006199156,0.00010687488,0.6770241,0.24398574,0.03824459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009905341,0.000009587567,0.0002511025,0.0016289748,0.0000046260857,0.00021503473,0.01619214,0.000072450064,0.00016001206,0.22179721,0.75964254,0.000016426475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005265828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007091471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013380337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066812267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005268873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07076281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969893280","doi":"10.65214/2164-7992.1431","title":"Epistemic Inclusion and the Argument from Circumspection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Democracy & Education","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Inclusion (mineral); Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015444640374617718,"score_gpt":0.24583232272057887,"score_spread":0.23038768234596116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969893280","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027036738,0.0045629553,0.05068665,0.69149613,0.0018732343,0.00006653452,0.000058556358,0.00015047331,0.22406876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85688305,0.001203361,0.009727588,0.109520726,0.0020833914,0.00035228452,0.000027520626,0.0001523298,0.020049768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9723423,0.02040785,0.0005678008,0.002079433,0.0029140012,0.0016885835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.957535,0.0341575,0.0022708555,0.002349478,0.002626705,0.0010604237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026854636,0.00066822994,0.0008008861,0.0017218171,0.008412922,0.006811276,0.0028081804,0.016353907,0.0042610806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038760778,0.00064874225,0.0014804631,0.0010530545,0.0730367,0.017169803,0.01204042,0.020549353,0.00072909845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046246846,0.00000251648,0.000043421227,0.000013102593,0.0000012970144,0.000025403115,0.0041857944,0.000035846348,0.000019336601,0.99233645,0.0027268021,0.0006054838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001861989,0.000018924278,0.00020293274,0.00029868376,0.000008833696,0.000108278386,0.0025260337,0.00036152065,0.0002661631,0.8965918,0.099575296,0.000022884626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041129226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030266389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026854636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059848446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043275263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14202255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972914130","doi":"10.1007/s11229-019-02384-6","title":"Elgin’s community-oriented steadfastness","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Philosophy of language; Philosophy of science; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Biology; Communication; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05240745648778027,"score_gpt":0.25869308278478226,"score_spread":0.20628562629700198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972914130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012066456,0.003662981,0.10808026,0.07376187,0.0027448984,0.00013483883,0.00022427096,0.00031254248,0.79901195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75907487,0.0017235993,0.06957182,0.013790044,0.0014448143,0.00045692312,0.00026900065,0.0006513607,0.15301761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99385804,0.0039234622,0.0001760633,0.0007763452,0.00085174263,0.00041434114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99309844,0.0037906412,0.0002515822,0.0013871706,0.0010694946,0.00040273907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064010727,0.0007316439,0.0007057697,0.0029680652,0.005628341,0.009692293,0.0017584682,0.0040672724,0.018568465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01777154,0.0003837148,0.0006170568,0.0015025509,0.021002797,0.011213875,0.006463195,0.0059736636,0.002968724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000090543135,0.000010353751,0.000034562378,0.000022072525,0.0000040639748,0.000023647188,0.0018173151,0.00009602179,0.000032037544,0.9896449,0.00474359,0.0035625035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012009429,0.0000044975013,0.00003961666,0.000068280955,0.0000037921293,0.000031363936,0.0008585167,0.0002602892,0.00015783124,0.928352,0.07020641,0.00000541025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030451457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004968689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018568465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039330716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039880616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062117696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977484258","doi":"10.1007/s11229-019-02415-2","title":"Two types of epistemic instrumentalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Rationality; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Naturalism; Norm (philosophy); Philosophy of language","score_opus":0.033962397511502485,"score_gpt":0.25872796484278643,"score_spread":0.22476556733128394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977484258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022189835,0.0012496432,0.25235406,0.025084963,0.00095301575,0.00033443395,0.0004235418,0.00037393937,0.6970366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8851382,0.0009937881,0.06480566,0.005064761,0.00086107117,0.0017221933,0.000357949,0.00038550567,0.040670827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986743,0.0069032535,0.000721391,0.0019368605,0.0024421723,0.001253307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96405345,0.02309547,0.0014839228,0.007984808,0.0023385268,0.0010439326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013339913,0.0010541064,0.0011762752,0.005884192,0.004246853,0.0124646695,0.0034678832,0.00730208,0.02233503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044242118,0.0010075143,0.001776641,0.0035185164,0.029090676,0.023588099,0.010101424,0.0085862,0.0028918006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009037386,0.000006997911,0.000057273985,0.000024118137,0.000003228082,0.000009039696,0.0011418816,0.000028527158,0.000026712309,0.9966497,0.0005095876,0.0015339451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022954944,0.0000085065185,0.0001523469,0.00011858702,0.000010180426,0.000052342337,0.0015865201,0.00046261647,0.0002902401,0.9819433,0.015342116,0.000010331242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053470815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006881046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02233503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003972834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031617004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07471812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978502643","doi":"10.1111/papq.12298","title":"KNOWLEDGE AND TRUTH: A SKEPTICAL CHALLENGE","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Philosophy","score_opus":0.056002850331290994,"score_gpt":0.2697287505763414,"score_spread":0.2137259002450504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978502643","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036771223,0.004591301,0.06587136,0.7753178,0.0022679288,0.000050624676,0.000090355374,0.00013121954,0.11490819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95224845,0.0012590426,0.0073679653,0.03327269,0.002584085,0.00007314885,0.000035448385,0.00007584061,0.0030832593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9360731,0.040675975,0.0027730416,0.0047978926,0.014269557,0.0014104272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73011345,0.20492361,0.011392214,0.02309173,0.0265737,0.0039053177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060677227,0.00060151046,0.001670208,0.003773963,0.0071571814,0.015645001,0.0033476828,0.01917773,0.0056733983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15151575,0.00081861037,0.001007546,0.0024215577,0.08181175,0.029409327,0.009784911,0.023264885,0.0014252871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048504127,0.000027902415,0.0003495646,0.0000723012,0.000016655717,0.00016994373,0.003967157,0.00031876215,0.00012750649,0.98333585,0.006330313,0.0052354992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018355047,0.0000114392005,0.000111087444,0.0001388785,0.000007330282,0.000114198156,0.0011019305,0.0007082625,0.00016118058,0.98663133,0.010977681,0.00001837659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001787581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008472476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060677227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065171807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004973118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32089567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982282514","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.3","title":"Moral Understanding and Cooperative Testimony","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Morality; Epistemology; Moral disengagement; Moral reasoning; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1488294891675281,"score_gpt":0.24871565293418713,"score_spread":0.09988616376665901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982282514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086808026,0.0063819867,0.16247126,0.08588094,0.0007792454,0.0001356227,0.00011655227,0.00013821691,0.6572882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98025435,0.0009948575,0.010252109,0.002336734,0.00019019403,0.00004379672,0.000033437937,0.000016642522,0.0058778552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782572,0.015204208,0.00069707655,0.0013136228,0.0035842136,0.00094369333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9637836,0.02552102,0.003282082,0.0024627917,0.0038015253,0.0011489092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019593216,0.00054608204,0.0007481998,0.0023813997,0.00425263,0.007424281,0.0015950135,0.0065841493,0.009078519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051581502,0.0004028376,0.00055132137,0.0009776889,0.029761575,0.009615858,0.010593564,0.0069987066,0.0006365254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010867778,0.000021799879,0.00014057414,0.00008714564,0.000010412361,0.00014442526,0.0062603387,0.0004603511,0.00020231577,0.9859286,0.0011950664,0.0055380175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013179236,0.000014784628,0.00032704472,0.0002454037,0.000012226964,0.00014660924,0.0027571884,0.0012868638,0.00030231726,0.97607327,0.018800935,0.000020211466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033714878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023021302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019593216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047711586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00385601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10362011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986504323","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzz056","title":"Practical Knowledge and Luminosity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Epistemology; Analogy; Counterexample; Connection (principal bundle); Action (physics); Philosophy; Accidental; Luck; Psychology; Law; Mathematics; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.09555211909169986,"score_gpt":0.32108479545437657,"score_spread":0.2255326763626767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2986504323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07852215,0.005396555,0.12703829,0.07762448,0.0006329848,0.00006279729,0.00011976236,0.00020421846,0.71039873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773547,0.00087743485,0.0063476786,0.0031608825,0.0003649515,0.00004860616,0.0000365827,0.0000492336,0.011759939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949875,0.0024099003,0.00020850428,0.0009101328,0.0011479915,0.00033587837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892865,0.0068198843,0.0010121629,0.0015671208,0.0009598551,0.00035444566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045187282,0.00033658088,0.00044530944,0.0014916565,0.0022502216,0.006079075,0.0012934542,0.003997758,0.00914586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013593558,0.00033587823,0.00053851324,0.0008531603,0.045171868,0.011613842,0.0066986545,0.0046104454,0.0010411742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035235748,0.0000035937842,0.00010055327,0.000014000844,0.0000019010129,0.00002191888,0.00043165716,0.00009746719,0.000043941127,0.9973539,0.00033691636,0.0015907205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052090636,0.000005919464,0.00016756226,0.000029668223,0.0000023847376,0.00004072443,0.00018837699,0.00022309645,0.00011830452,0.98857516,0.010639013,0.000004493698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012129223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072997523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00914586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004056994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015372401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030595958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990335875","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-34503-7_4","title":"The Benefits to Inquiry Argument","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Focus (optics); Psychology; Empirical research; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.23532784793882838,"score_gpt":0.3519613905553805,"score_spread":0.11663354261655212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990335875","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004539625,0.015751626,0.01370686,0.51508665,0.0063886354,0.000045115477,0.000096088785,0.00011233767,0.44427302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62320477,0.010302327,0.016481632,0.15079412,0.021930894,0.00053897646,0.00017484074,0.00046272704,0.17610973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752051,0.015823893,0.0005444924,0.0019442267,0.005553912,0.00092838646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.925383,0.058233008,0.0012951824,0.008459773,0.004750329,0.0018787154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024939964,0.0005481356,0.0011524793,0.0018550784,0.005302574,0.01327954,0.0021729036,0.012281081,0.02134619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07890788,0.00048351916,0.0007023732,0.0010772435,0.035799067,0.02743025,0.009419323,0.016987246,0.0047243135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010764297,0.000008996017,0.00006191508,0.000028047978,0.000003000882,0.000023533237,0.0005807745,0.000026156007,0.000017999286,0.9844327,0.012186659,0.0026193229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002146814,0.00000500549,0.000100015626,0.00013698403,0.0000057487982,0.00005276916,0.0009123063,0.00018602185,0.00004684889,0.87030196,0.12822461,0.0000062487293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018666507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023346727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024939964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042491364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005669532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13189673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991162242","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-34503-7_2","title":"An Analysis of Ideal Cases of Disagreement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Carry (investment); Psychology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.19357284664180038,"score_gpt":0.36698499496930576,"score_spread":0.17341214832750537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991162242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20151314,0.000996417,0.09240626,0.0112519665,0.00026678256,0.00045727578,0.0004275596,0.00018254861,0.692498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671118,0.00028729273,0.017969055,0.0003958028,0.00005391094,0.00042879462,0.00017682466,0.00008482069,0.013491663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98113155,0.011452984,0.00069895876,0.0009295909,0.003542691,0.0022442488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9311419,0.05817769,0.0020808773,0.0036793614,0.0038197949,0.0011003548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01603108,0.00047349196,0.0007575708,0.0042481073,0.008929857,0.008446094,0.0025307802,0.0046281735,0.020224342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.082448445,0.0006723061,0.0012586706,0.0041411966,0.013394973,0.010380328,0.0052843383,0.0045258035,0.0016991437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041441122,0.000018730903,0.0005554851,0.000023391758,0.000004268976,0.0003879274,0.0033456397,0.0006062146,0.00003318769,0.9899054,0.002198029,0.002880261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005151934,0.000027081756,0.0010845899,0.00021621305,0.000020920694,0.0014490209,0.02330392,0.014300014,0.00034681745,0.9187225,0.040440094,0.000037310536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002534154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025826048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020224342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004460399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027182915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08478153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991357184","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-34503-7_5","title":"Objections to the Benefits to Inquiry Argument","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Rationality; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.24333865252077974,"score_gpt":0.35525924248763585,"score_spread":0.11192058996685611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991357184","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044668824,0.0033960983,0.0049063624,0.8305234,0.0060779937,0.00005328636,0.00009675847,0.00007003638,0.15040924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39957348,0.0028481092,0.013190837,0.47883543,0.025317872,0.0008950178,0.00011483705,0.00036586335,0.07885855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96490586,0.01672123,0.0010746848,0.0033782015,0.0123582035,0.0015617384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8628364,0.11504305,0.0028595293,0.007152686,0.009989432,0.0021188417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04384507,0.0007344511,0.0012383667,0.0026436711,0.0066598873,0.0118267,0.005473343,0.031244164,0.012138447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12817262,0.0006291194,0.0013089173,0.0019540137,0.054337315,0.019745344,0.009885123,0.03382037,0.0034760663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002209153,0.00001574321,0.00009950746,0.00003652699,0.000008522568,0.00006191576,0.0015621233,0.00006271913,0.0000354427,0.96024424,0.035654824,0.002196316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006664711,0.000007859186,0.00017896315,0.0002218763,0.000019998444,0.00009730345,0.0015418822,0.0004240069,0.00015877817,0.8298491,0.16741602,0.000017520642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027485762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027956432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04384507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061417846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064136647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23187768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995016241","doi":"10.14746/il.2018.41.7","title":"Testing Epistemic Injustice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Investigationes Linguisticae","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Converse; Injustice; Affect (linguistics); Categorization; Social psychology; Psychology; Competence (human resources); Reliability (semiconductor); Epistemology; Ethnic group; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09095911920763457,"score_gpt":0.26836426598987223,"score_spread":0.17740514678223768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995016241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9345743,0.00012754418,0.024982229,0.0010324101,0.000087312495,0.00044131526,0.0001989862,0.00014491653,0.038410928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99190056,0.00003984644,0.006220244,0.00020675285,0.000022823044,0.00031872516,0.00010080529,0.000046949368,0.0011433281],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96933806,0.015736248,0.002372335,0.0038830007,0.0074727894,0.0011975474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.55769414,0.35516432,0.03341856,0.037598535,0.012879776,0.0032447095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022782627,0.00093223935,0.0007579557,0.0014073115,0.0019721594,0.0028039746,0.0018252078,0.0022313592,0.009785067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21614031,0.0004728896,0.0006318252,0.00070215965,0.006592785,0.0072028725,0.0059094974,0.0038063487,0.00084720197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007214285,0.010212715,0.3117496,0.0028445618,0.0006927744,0.0025266903,0.1987803,0.006101507,0.066631496,0.1985558,0.0040032337,0.19068696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010037349,0.010333519,0.32089993,0.0010632678,0.0007504694,0.004850827,0.07542528,0.04231539,0.11200924,0.38989246,0.040875282,0.0005806225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009180406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005072312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022782627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012219942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012203611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12048745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996507848","doi":"10.1007/s10677-019-10052-4","title":"First-Personal Moral Testimony: a Defence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Political philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Deliberation; Constitution; Philosophy of medicine; Moral responsibility; Sociology; Moral psychology; Contractualism; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.07534344144396948,"score_gpt":0.30975995060497785,"score_spread":0.23441650916100837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996507848","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013876849,0.008459437,0.07854597,0.47167704,0.0049453196,0.00015885566,0.00022683783,0.00010555449,0.42200416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7726816,0.004367762,0.027087476,0.1090488,0.0072069345,0.00076850725,0.00013021247,0.0001942295,0.07851452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97828114,0.011905332,0.0010285471,0.0029588302,0.004663845,0.0011622632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92960143,0.053542834,0.0024183954,0.007453154,0.0058168136,0.0011674438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026096012,0.00090366934,0.001878936,0.0021865105,0.0077965586,0.010590661,0.0060411193,0.038105972,0.010951785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08697301,0.0009982958,0.0017542262,0.0016207973,0.029315807,0.017734049,0.010016814,0.034267094,0.0031129715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000105971385,0.0000047168783,0.00004994383,0.000043306583,0.000006649499,0.000054697,0.001257321,0.000031828014,0.000028589498,0.9908535,0.005042609,0.0026163394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003067522,0.000011825618,0.00011628413,0.00037811184,0.000014201666,0.00030197354,0.0011030658,0.0004904058,0.00014508262,0.95797527,0.03941682,0.000016250428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038319249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039798613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038105972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005353286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068932376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13801056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997545171","doi":"10.1017/s0229705100008338","title":"Introduction: Belief and Agency","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03272854096133959,"score_gpt":0.23327151182994074,"score_spread":0.20054297086860115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997545171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005276571,0.1179195,0.034018137,0.12774801,0.008583761,0.000066498986,0.0021043073,0.0001996118,0.70408356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49574792,0.10921474,0.01834394,0.032149334,0.023784207,0.00032106237,0.002074393,0.00031418045,0.31805024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994791,0.00022625824,0.00002202871,0.000104681276,0.00012146124,0.000046467674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857104,0.0009879689,0.00005331367,0.000099191166,0.00020596113,0.000082575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088763237,0.0005913095,0.0004714664,0.0009783342,0.0015102862,0.0036988594,0.0007351674,0.0024254068,0.042508103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031713843,0.0002981332,0.0005529351,0.0013739818,0.0045679286,0.003952083,0.0008845739,0.0037206747,0.0048098667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015735062,0.0000076244655,0.000121798825,0.00014851903,0.000005277929,0.00003764206,0.0007779737,0.0001563816,0.00007613476,0.9258769,0.06060849,0.012167502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007921322,0.000014308714,0.00071807386,0.00041481887,0.000007752568,0.00013187091,0.00037396915,0.00022706746,0.000084087675,0.65460396,0.34340635,0.0000098320115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005401343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003707885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042508103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025179896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014348883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14220375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998387000","doi":"10.1017/psa.2023.94","title":"Beyond finite additivity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Additive function; Countable set; Lottery; Axiom; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Closure (psychology); Argument (complex analysis); Pure mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Statistics; Economics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.08063606741575231,"score_gpt":0.2888697624128787,"score_spread":0.2082336949971264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998387000","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041985825,0.0046443585,0.4611171,0.034984466,0.0019182486,0.00009867351,0.0004573713,0.00062217144,0.45417187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93327415,0.0013576667,0.033068124,0.0052835387,0.001193659,0.00022555236,0.00018840717,0.00020296974,0.025205892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99375397,0.0024169483,0.00031679164,0.0010637986,0.0019796365,0.00046880828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98214126,0.011042783,0.00063682266,0.0032994743,0.0021314903,0.0007482271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073573063,0.00077845127,0.0011653262,0.002568177,0.0029669108,0.0059330296,0.0017588071,0.0018456208,0.0105288075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018397525,0.0006331804,0.0020377522,0.0008746514,0.021698564,0.009127902,0.0060021956,0.0071414295,0.0015395002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045621327,0.00000495997,0.000038379603,0.000016736149,0.0000052353516,0.00001479269,0.00006400069,0.00024715715,0.00005453026,0.9979371,0.00055491534,0.0010576866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029567673,0.0000042882707,0.000029677722,0.000020794718,0.000003742744,0.000021952983,0.000016525277,0.0006462428,0.000113323986,0.9951166,0.004019903,0.0000039989914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001709133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010400139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0105288075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037532786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017219556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038909554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998568607","doi":"","title":"Collateral Beliefs and the Rashomon Effect","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Collateral; Argumentation theory; Cognition; Psychology; Work (physics); Social psychology; Rash; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Medicine; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.020396544838116714,"score_gpt":0.22962599050379426,"score_spread":0.20922944566567755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998568607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4373557,0.001728503,0.03741233,0.021463068,0.00026354674,0.000108761145,0.0002575694,0.0001852874,0.50122523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995194,0.00018207546,0.0017115608,0.00035266706,0.000035266352,0.00002571914,0.000024717538,0.000018609653,0.0024553956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961473,0.002296779,0.0001562381,0.0005376797,0.00061456265,0.0002475069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97855264,0.014634154,0.0022948137,0.002929055,0.0010684314,0.0005209813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004704419,0.00033172203,0.00033436177,0.0011003808,0.002206341,0.0030648396,0.0008055726,0.00203378,0.014687354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036292434,0.00039227091,0.00029186718,0.00078185543,0.012805254,0.008013139,0.0067172125,0.002953704,0.0006652504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024841333,0.000041200197,0.0068459073,0.00018991895,0.000034584635,0.00065202394,0.03401606,0.00033761663,0.0017137259,0.93080777,0.0022567452,0.022856195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012231342,0.000116848256,0.015704995,0.00036866797,0.000074673706,0.0010542443,0.02167433,0.0014918727,0.00166703,0.90544635,0.052198347,0.000080251215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016974146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00241389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014687354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014915484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008235022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049134135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999479811","doi":"10.1080/00048402.2019.1699127","title":"Evidentialism as an Historical Theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Internalism and externalism; Denial; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Social epistemology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Chemistry","score_opus":0.11479277114888586,"score_gpt":0.2956678500458718,"score_spread":0.18087507889698595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999479811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017536197,0.012302028,0.37729067,0.034469865,0.0011837309,0.000103342594,0.0003250444,0.0002160611,0.5565731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8507635,0.005269725,0.09361058,0.004644244,0.0019295942,0.00024662534,0.00027643048,0.00023816667,0.04302106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950412,0.0025343134,0.0002616768,0.0009941685,0.0008740555,0.0002945382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99181443,0.005043633,0.0005560368,0.0011683966,0.0011055105,0.0003119839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009092815,0.0005499141,0.0005966076,0.0022070464,0.0031131536,0.0055441726,0.0014608831,0.0022206455,0.006182308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008708767,0.00051266555,0.0014087968,0.0012224261,0.021006562,0.010802963,0.003188293,0.006123164,0.0010712495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.984087e-7,0.0000013755171,0.00001709714,0.000006932215,0.0000013171734,0.0000063356447,0.00013465551,0.00007525922,0.00001027176,0.9991549,0.00017857901,0.00041249974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040188706,0.000003892349,0.000041021616,0.000022237376,0.000003621728,0.000018384184,0.000059960177,0.00040725607,0.000052007388,0.9860351,0.013349389,0.0000031991403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002310671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018392946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009092815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069070756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025059434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050114572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006942597","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i1.5969","title":"Adversariality and Argumentation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Adversarial system; Epistemology; Argument map; Variation (astronomy); Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1232533442587925,"score_gpt":0.27046581143204734,"score_spread":0.14721246717325484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006942597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03144888,0.0119194565,0.4158602,0.074324034,0.0010436437,0.00024229095,0.00011498051,0.00018129732,0.46486515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94665533,0.0026645926,0.03331113,0.0037222197,0.00082041067,0.00029895615,0.00005216158,0.0000927126,0.012382612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96728075,0.023540488,0.001316525,0.002733355,0.0036036216,0.0015252744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9657438,0.025459647,0.002798092,0.0032880483,0.0015934961,0.0011169201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019940242,0.000833353,0.0009932313,0.0025619015,0.00665096,0.01303863,0.0021682975,0.007465338,0.005076847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026954196,0.00051995175,0.0014055336,0.0015979009,0.054908726,0.015618431,0.009956313,0.007645169,0.0007863464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021214105,0.00000249193,0.000031674026,0.000012789754,0.000004013999,0.000015069711,0.00034016115,0.00017586909,0.000018290188,0.998553,0.00016931306,0.0006752008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046499867,0.0000033671367,0.000028523331,0.000033007276,0.0000023754453,0.000026676804,0.00014218115,0.0003632948,0.000034787605,0.99173015,0.007626829,0.000004108858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013575436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076524017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019940242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066474257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003093457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10545534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007649577","doi":"10.1007/s11245-020-09693-3","title":"Epistemic Coverage and Argument Closure","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Topoi","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.06250444303548561,"score_gpt":0.24254009791495218,"score_spread":0.18003565487946657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007649577","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04117158,0.0064072716,0.34048593,0.09224692,0.0016683862,0.00019422278,0.0006724882,0.00053215446,0.516621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9321611,0.0015132558,0.04295115,0.0036513659,0.001741446,0.0003828557,0.00048322824,0.00031362803,0.016802019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97001487,0.019436613,0.0016294783,0.0037280563,0.003482958,0.0017080077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8916237,0.09166538,0.0024883933,0.008227318,0.004787122,0.001208158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025851673,0.0009165329,0.0028257188,0.005668543,0.008539122,0.014823902,0.0035995631,0.008104069,0.019047255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0836899,0.001434717,0.0026944971,0.0038060327,0.029079676,0.03466836,0.011730524,0.01173378,0.0018684942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017638464,0.000011008087,0.00008465429,0.000041507617,0.000010384536,0.000035188204,0.00084123976,0.00013555185,0.000032872074,0.99567527,0.0011274158,0.0019873034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009640107,0.0000019264332,0.000024668178,0.000025815149,0.000006510989,0.000015500873,0.00021208782,0.00035609023,0.000055050416,0.996249,0.0030401815,0.0000035366024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024243838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013511227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025851673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052458816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036009226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13671833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009626191","doi":"10.22330/he/35/002-005","title":"Thinking We Know More than We Do","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Ethology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.1551963241839536,"score_gpt":0.3277417587784189,"score_spread":0.17254543459446528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009626191","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008726818,0.022863945,0.0529492,0.5132831,0.0075241425,0.00007831357,0.00018385191,0.00048597675,0.39390478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47461537,0.018890897,0.04016573,0.287912,0.005359597,0.00032084,0.0005038163,0.0008732812,0.1713586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853903,0.0082955025,0.00035662454,0.0015854613,0.0033806164,0.0009915198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985658,0.0067401985,0.0013995715,0.0018466735,0.0023306457,0.002024958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009183167,0.0011440667,0.0006850822,0.001647187,0.0059378063,0.017251521,0.0017244763,0.004416181,0.009835877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01848447,0.0006866042,0.00076447485,0.0011645633,0.05259348,0.02757518,0.006013985,0.010819643,0.007114076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026858934,0.00004173488,0.0010839673,0.00028806407,0.00008718011,0.00018949098,0.06319352,0.0002319187,0.0003140752,0.69528335,0.20519876,0.034061063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000099038225,0.000015532652,0.00036047213,0.00039464817,0.000017573799,0.00016960078,0.024701457,0.00015761504,0.00020749585,0.36623767,0.60769385,0.0000341965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008164856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075745205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017251521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004653166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065482794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048565805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011876580","doi":"10.1111/rati.12261","title":"The knowledge norm of assertion in dialectical context","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Dialectic; Epistemology; Injustice; Deontic logic; Natural (archaeology); Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10974393688812152,"score_gpt":0.29286056849595526,"score_spread":0.18311663160783376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011876580","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25794497,0.0012949428,0.4055645,0.01880424,0.0005384882,0.0001491562,0.00010604179,0.00036379963,0.31523386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917686,0.00006216113,0.006917723,0.00021296921,0.000049861068,0.000049053317,0.000010186019,0.000022258198,0.0009071231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9415068,0.041242108,0.0031100137,0.0044707595,0.007745369,0.001924933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91569436,0.0568918,0.005657414,0.011306775,0.008726316,0.0017233859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03014705,0.0003370802,0.0008296149,0.0017996082,0.0046889028,0.0090273535,0.0019220655,0.0037502581,0.0026942014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06641401,0.0005342387,0.00051574403,0.0010186087,0.045910683,0.014919842,0.008256349,0.0044956966,0.00041374814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022250118,0.0000080732125,0.00024665598,0.00002464447,0.0000038117012,0.000055870572,0.0060515986,0.00028885918,0.00019901281,0.99092263,0.00011764095,0.002058942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020771387,0.000023668521,0.0002403218,0.00006748298,0.0000104688625,0.00010064806,0.0040742783,0.003586131,0.0010342451,0.98286104,0.0079564,0.000024613151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026504893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010170387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03014705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045359936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035876266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15943474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012043692","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-35304-9_9","title":"Explaining Sherlock’s Glance. On the Perception of Historical Past","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in the history of philosophy of mind","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Intentionality; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Perception; Object (grammar); Philosophy; Relation (database); Philosophy of mind; Phenomenology (philosophy); Metaphysics; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.26631171774850754,"score_gpt":0.2884752393437134,"score_spread":0.02216352159520585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012043692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073146573,0.04341154,0.010682854,0.4102087,0.004904031,0.0000324236,0.00036802073,0.00012622851,0.52295154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39163414,0.013720475,0.0058961282,0.09033952,0.00353278,0.00014671845,0.0002411297,0.0005143992,0.49397475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994172,0.00025543652,0.000015264211,0.00013343523,0.00010131148,0.000077420984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855596,0.0009635955,0.00007448244,0.00008633872,0.00023896425,0.00008068371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013358301,0.00045520806,0.00033203335,0.0012079409,0.0034755345,0.0039010453,0.0010086178,0.0042462703,0.012691601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050648474,0.00033129725,0.0002894916,0.0010259198,0.010069327,0.010761457,0.0023895032,0.0063050813,0.0028247368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014962427,0.000004863206,0.00013685905,0.000019460747,0.0000016967257,0.000060333605,0.0033605269,0.000049393693,0.00004187469,0.90422446,0.08504988,0.0070356415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016568372,0.0000058413093,0.00039976934,0.00021568815,0.00000532981,0.00015734737,0.0030081423,0.00021302118,0.00023021112,0.5200285,0.47570503,0.000014614176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012893262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028051876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012893262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002779886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014660319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04245758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012377090","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqaa007","title":"Epistemic Judgement and Motivation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Judgement; Epistemology; Doxastic logic; Expressivism; Normative; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12314749931926806,"score_gpt":0.252096904582415,"score_spread":0.12894940526314697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012377090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19593617,0.0013290189,0.11875629,0.036735803,0.00063274254,0.000110894296,0.00016780107,0.0001452865,0.64618605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99386036,0.00015378797,0.002639467,0.0006131137,0.00010575138,0.000023403161,0.000024517976,0.000016952943,0.0025624915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992668,0.004144007,0.00029508845,0.0009284613,0.0012216062,0.0007428399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875985,0.0068287696,0.0012788939,0.0014071134,0.0019994185,0.00088729704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008134536,0.00031870915,0.0005836285,0.0013650462,0.002138136,0.005487148,0.0008020947,0.0027450768,0.006504507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022370933,0.00027631724,0.00065847335,0.0008020351,0.023057407,0.006725945,0.0050667436,0.004163396,0.00060265674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010836569,0.000013337728,0.0003468941,0.00003293296,0.000006377043,0.00003125172,0.0010116796,0.00021499433,0.00016628642,0.9952722,0.00042310497,0.0024702689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075453563,0.000009762993,0.00041359046,0.00003402427,0.0000041906296,0.000029874012,0.00042242222,0.0005305056,0.00009829946,0.99504787,0.003392179,0.000009703094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010131728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000686752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008134536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002788885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015544514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04302001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3019303899","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/mdqt6","title":"Descartes’s Schism, Locke’s Reunion: Completing the Pragmatic Turn in Epistemology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Schism; Philosophy; Action (physics); Descriptive knowledge; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.09798251607200524,"score_gpt":0.26177161339147664,"score_spread":0.1637890973194714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3019303899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026924975,0.09318794,0.117522486,0.30652994,0.010354511,0.00009710648,0.00022153782,0.0002247413,0.44493675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8489927,0.021975417,0.038028974,0.027457876,0.0082054315,0.00026080702,0.00015208792,0.00045298628,0.0544738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990388,0.0063829212,0.0003671951,0.0009117465,0.0013601097,0.0005900383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926846,0.004735932,0.00025936094,0.0011049346,0.0008839468,0.0003311145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012917098,0.00095768116,0.0015744601,0.0028469083,0.007456619,0.009748328,0.0011960907,0.004962403,0.0033711165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017990068,0.0007658405,0.0011000439,0.0018373303,0.077054486,0.02437886,0.008142947,0.0112140225,0.0011971103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070536325,0.0000028924896,0.000027949798,0.00001843439,0.0000022277795,0.000021624457,0.0018725343,0.000062165534,0.00001763747,0.99322367,0.0025187419,0.002225188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065348295,0.000004285736,0.000028688117,0.000039683346,0.0000017651537,0.000023476514,0.0006551206,0.00010915872,0.00003239138,0.9594607,0.039630286,0.0000079424535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010873201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072802464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012917098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071555357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052819075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020100236","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.9","title":"Credence: A Belief-First Approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.1280423749139143,"score_gpt":0.23477625197244703,"score_spread":0.10673387705853274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020100236","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024453918,0.0070427954,0.63559407,0.07251842,0.0011860679,0.00013757426,0.00024520306,0.00016996972,0.258652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9424463,0.001268671,0.045515798,0.0026826153,0.0010457841,0.00013020735,0.000057090223,0.00004766156,0.006805917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98646927,0.008162836,0.0003917053,0.0014916185,0.0027677596,0.0007167868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599577,0.029700743,0.0018858535,0.0033766152,0.0037201848,0.0013587816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01929554,0.00080334954,0.0014520129,0.0046079666,0.0036559294,0.009922777,0.0035629354,0.0059629763,0.00884518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037225727,0.00077251135,0.0014104525,0.0018038352,0.030356966,0.014898202,0.004228456,0.0093330415,0.0009583384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006206188,0.0000060188645,0.00006601103,0.000020171354,0.000007820176,0.000024632152,0.00021653247,0.00050792145,0.000017793656,0.9972742,0.00030010825,0.0015524937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052501277,0.0000048961597,0.00005273168,0.000028920269,0.0000041239823,0.000025193574,0.000049648163,0.0016647523,0.00003449325,0.9961261,0.001998139,0.000005827362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038249453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022325187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01929554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008287322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028750668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102045834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020355059","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12668","title":"The relationship between belief and credence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Credence; Proposition; Normative; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.2932182884735981,"score_gpt":0.30660321665271006,"score_spread":0.013384928179111966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020355059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19317365,0.0062078927,0.14298552,0.052300777,0.0005745391,0.00006064723,0.00032663933,0.00014251075,0.6042279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995713,0.00035320918,0.0023398986,0.00028849987,0.00007399086,0.000019923868,0.000015497662,0.000013016977,0.0011829486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99272245,0.0045344653,0.00023081791,0.0006822643,0.0015039381,0.00032618502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9559026,0.0341288,0.0035862857,0.0021384119,0.0028462238,0.0013977587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007052079,0.00024137198,0.00032838978,0.0026674846,0.0018540367,0.00746384,0.0007152829,0.0024050886,0.0077608735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046156187,0.0002842268,0.00025938218,0.0020374379,0.027077643,0.00867202,0.0031937305,0.0035092782,0.00052325247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001155712,0.000011095088,0.0011117755,0.000024531655,0.00000764271,0.00003339848,0.0013450177,0.00022282594,0.00007074708,0.9933229,0.0003330705,0.0035053655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006117263,0.000009983172,0.0016984801,0.00007760254,0.000005470233,0.00005198717,0.00082532555,0.0009083491,0.00009166952,0.99198407,0.004328944,0.000012045359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023189434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011596998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077608735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029802648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012792588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0372954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025542601","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/zhb7j","title":"Knowledge and Luck","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Wake Forest University; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Luck; Attribution; Psychology; Relation (database); Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Data mining","score_opus":0.12054616959462217,"score_gpt":0.2819917698219886,"score_spread":0.16144560022736643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025542601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5515464,0.0038434926,0.025238516,0.014132163,0.00020124197,0.00012051751,0.00035428142,0.000101674246,0.40446165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99628085,0.00031952112,0.00088357547,0.00026443624,0.00002441677,0.000021532318,0.000034915156,0.000015603797,0.002155049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910382,0.0045070713,0.0004512066,0.00084818964,0.0019824638,0.0011729382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96422386,0.01824567,0.006717745,0.0046518217,0.0030970485,0.003063817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008803783,0.00043191528,0.00048006768,0.0032842641,0.0023269365,0.0066558667,0.0007812682,0.0015164568,0.008123775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038789604,0.0002866564,0.0004883999,0.0021167325,0.024811022,0.007689699,0.0063378196,0.0020197826,0.0007220715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018896873,0.00019053476,0.102638036,0.00043375374,0.00019595667,0.00035477892,0.020217467,0.002706017,0.00049415394,0.791998,0.0026053523,0.07797697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003648035,0.00018369092,0.11012712,0.00058069546,0.00006780864,0.00035650836,0.013727083,0.0016251983,0.000806054,0.83432174,0.03804517,0.00012247148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030230365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028070775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008803783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033862123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021832057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046559393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029758781","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6689","title":"Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patience; Virtue; Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Power (physics); Politics; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.051573007410098064,"score_gpt":0.28711575886308616,"score_spread":0.2355427514529881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029758781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1506489,0.007439809,0.1748662,0.15907025,0.002130724,0.00013161838,0.000081457605,0.00024548479,0.5053855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873546,0.00046692704,0.0054221256,0.002380515,0.00030414425,0.00005394819,0.0000118673115,0.00005332151,0.003952686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96635365,0.025578277,0.001160906,0.0020027827,0.0032701667,0.0016342213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9433214,0.041344646,0.0050068703,0.005342508,0.0025286428,0.0024559943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0250964,0.00055315153,0.00090718054,0.0019723405,0.008124686,0.017195145,0.002033631,0.007198322,0.0048409645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048483636,0.0005105267,0.00095179945,0.0016691112,0.07283927,0.02952772,0.01586111,0.009257879,0.00071763573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016386475,0.000010470045,0.00022739642,0.00004133861,0.000008611061,0.00009195886,0.008521321,0.00012828186,0.00008877846,0.9878439,0.00063234026,0.0023892175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000142832705,0.000014220436,0.00015918852,0.00008043443,0.000004931922,0.000099489655,0.0028179947,0.00034515775,0.00011761413,0.9799619,0.016370643,0.00001407142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042496054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042425242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0250964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031464577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002634712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13272405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3030518148","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i2.6312","title":"On Presumptions, Burdens of Proof, and Explanations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Deontic logic; Function (biology); Epistemology; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.11392229568995417,"score_gpt":0.27014979179833964,"score_spread":0.1562274961083855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3030518148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037417166,0.015737843,0.41323385,0.09033454,0.0008328208,0.00021259736,0.00042027974,0.00018780037,0.44162315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9069351,0.0067234943,0.057898954,0.007657615,0.0021985997,0.00067187694,0.00022856073,0.0001996217,0.017486138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9706139,0.01737827,0.001567636,0.0022889932,0.0066184932,0.0015327965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9312465,0.054221343,0.0036061232,0.006781507,0.0030196954,0.0011247698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026930304,0.0012867446,0.0013877851,0.0043200273,0.005798608,0.013054464,0.0038909803,0.008852391,0.010418943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055368233,0.0012151101,0.0010841438,0.0034230032,0.072907366,0.03369072,0.009567209,0.009523889,0.0015295569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002791351,0.0000018622482,0.000020920565,0.000008119573,0.0000011920717,0.0000083501645,0.00019454889,0.00008867119,0.0000097459415,0.9989968,0.00015371572,0.0005132974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051793377,0.0000018649616,0.00003273277,0.000031218577,0.0000017092922,0.000010978302,0.00008562439,0.00017403392,0.000020495716,0.99702734,0.002605588,0.0000031762481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004123839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022899737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026930304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010038442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004904612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14242274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3031012013","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2020.102950","title":"Knowledge, adequacy, and approximate truth","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Consciousness and Cognition","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Denial; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Truth value; Attribution; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07589878001258941,"score_gpt":0.2646032141199301,"score_spread":0.18870443410734067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3031012013","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22932397,0.019132419,0.4838884,0.03950878,0.00059919053,0.00010910457,0.0005105576,0.00031610887,0.22661142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803889,0.00093948585,0.016254006,0.00045467756,0.0002201835,0.0000673808,0.00011315866,0.000032344804,0.0015300149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98868036,0.0069216443,0.00080517266,0.0012946406,0.0018458448,0.00045231092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9401374,0.048523415,0.0019272775,0.0057570147,0.0028789374,0.00077595905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010912338,0.0005037035,0.0015910009,0.004240542,0.002790506,0.008459066,0.001944717,0.0037835068,0.0044737626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062418796,0.0006256597,0.0011519212,0.0025063572,0.031823196,0.021918578,0.0053627035,0.0035950458,0.00044162115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003425875,0.000013346294,0.00040261503,0.000057472935,0.00001585982,0.000023038521,0.0006017299,0.0009901397,0.000038686645,0.99288815,0.00034159978,0.0045929966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037864336,0.000002594495,0.00006790229,0.000011889384,0.0000026630066,0.000013827974,0.0001253084,0.0008391847,0.000025932397,0.998444,0.00045990787,0.0000030596232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004092205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022029937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010912338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035170205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025426527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057710707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033019224","doi":"10.33735/phimisci.2020.1.28","title":"Is mental time travel real time travel?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and the Mind Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Carlsbergfondet","keywords":"Chronesthesia; Episodic memory; Reconstructive memory; Autobiographical memory; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Semantic memory; Cognitive science; Explicit memory; Cognition; Recall; Computer science","score_opus":0.11869765040306593,"score_gpt":0.2704323677258901,"score_spread":0.15173471732282415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033019224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1889185,0.035427094,0.12852237,0.15000024,0.0028686575,0.00008112176,0.00077249744,0.00030667929,0.49310282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818711,0.0058785286,0.00350335,0.0016203383,0.0006712507,0.00003472174,0.00015283233,0.00006074556,0.006207069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995035,0.00021764616,0.000022556773,0.00011978848,0.00006611475,0.00007035979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808395,0.00086517475,0.00032545422,0.0003319647,0.00020499533,0.00018855902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010292762,0.00021172219,0.00025038482,0.00080102764,0.0009553655,0.004334139,0.00056082377,0.0013497396,0.008829034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007041579,0.00017302285,0.00033274476,0.0011433138,0.011434638,0.011766659,0.0016635158,0.0017239979,0.00078653597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029283587,0.0000069123334,0.0007192291,0.00009221957,0.000013740368,0.00010823738,0.004789817,0.00029551212,0.00011420332,0.97569066,0.0024931936,0.015647005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000955105,0.000015595313,0.0022324752,0.00012689237,0.000012362311,0.0003255969,0.004687245,0.0006541397,0.00012675424,0.92712146,0.06466888,0.000019057858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036343804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014209815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008829034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017953448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007733952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029536068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033382224","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i2.6327","title":"Should Climate Scientists Fly?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Skepticism; Argument map; Epistemology; Climate science; Work (physics); Action (physics); Climate change; Sociology; Philosophy; Argumentation theory; Engineering; Ecology; Medicine","score_opus":0.21233637359910273,"score_gpt":0.3018732965723466,"score_spread":0.0895369229732439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033382224","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039262094,0.009326843,0.030940136,0.73898166,0.004570138,0.00008538565,0.00011123449,0.000093148155,0.17662941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8795667,0.0047842944,0.007859644,0.08728871,0.0018811737,0.00019180872,0.00008503339,0.00013726344,0.018205436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885527,0.0072972355,0.0003448739,0.0014785862,0.0013885442,0.00093803596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9583626,0.032721423,0.002888966,0.0015501046,0.0032273605,0.0012496881],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02440394,0.00041722888,0.00054459675,0.00126271,0.007458772,0.011735035,0.0018818993,0.008435594,0.011913556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04849012,0.0002769587,0.00066170754,0.0014719471,0.01932174,0.015866313,0.005275908,0.012231852,0.0019322028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038248807,0.0000264823,0.001660787,0.00015565402,0.000029222016,0.00014043313,0.021783872,0.0001839418,0.0003478579,0.9488328,0.019889036,0.006911616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002545171,0.000038813036,0.0014101791,0.00064502045,0.000037897596,0.00013639731,0.041170537,0.0007978236,0.00086240255,0.6460034,0.3088415,0.000030560204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017674378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018391651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99254125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050065108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038774898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12906194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035896799","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2020.2.8030","title":"The Epistemic Significance of #MeToo","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Virtue; Narrative; Harassment; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07227289438995121,"score_gpt":0.2552564044160197,"score_spread":0.1829835100260685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035896799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07303596,0.0044405693,0.064382225,0.07652556,0.0014567877,0.00005266933,0.00008126162,0.00006134264,0.7799636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823844,0.00085815793,0.0032890234,0.0024595584,0.0004261796,0.000042115764,0.000015784406,0.000023590983,0.010501204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885783,0.0074945875,0.0004097097,0.000755335,0.0020620888,0.0006999164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9705202,0.021838456,0.0020824478,0.002308942,0.0024973054,0.0007527622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008043538,0.00028208975,0.00034104963,0.0010498286,0.005238029,0.009985941,0.0011249728,0.003055268,0.0054073464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03578748,0.00028392804,0.00026511247,0.00078863814,0.030838436,0.010455894,0.010102863,0.004095471,0.00059781777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002556702,0.000009136358,0.00055295695,0.00009556956,0.000006272486,0.00023369734,0.017258817,0.00015093917,0.00030944668,0.9685135,0.0014449175,0.011399281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009097467,0.000034301967,0.0010896085,0.00050289766,0.000020917023,0.0006550745,0.021591263,0.0006271499,0.0016361689,0.8538514,0.11995505,0.000027070293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013961956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013092957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009985941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027465469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021768752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04253882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036287516","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000374","title":"Peer Idealization and Internal Examples in the Epistemology of Disagreement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Universidade Nova de Lisboa","keywords":"Idealization; Epistemology; Extant taxon; Discipline; Genius; Analytic philosophy; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Contemporary philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.10639091111988579,"score_gpt":0.27810875838514937,"score_spread":0.17171784726526357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036287516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12866537,0.0020448335,0.395265,0.028605781,0.0006753046,0.00017012731,0.00010901415,0.00030472723,0.4441598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790055,0.00030048608,0.016961759,0.00045209983,0.00014374041,0.00012777359,0.000034019104,0.00009313606,0.0028814508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91708064,0.06274249,0.0024485572,0.004915184,0.01017775,0.0026353442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9285134,0.04504528,0.005337946,0.012595678,0.00635967,0.0021480443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03648741,0.0006553761,0.0012214308,0.0047452445,0.0103800725,0.015819475,0.0032776603,0.0067710145,0.0053822165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076321654,0.00085184595,0.0011818255,0.0024213076,0.09299581,0.035540253,0.020274911,0.008866849,0.0008812786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011398352,0.000005633641,0.00025286266,0.000031764193,0.000004871926,0.00007154896,0.008446793,0.00024525964,0.00006229759,0.98860824,0.00035910268,0.0019002103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000138688465,0.000010529481,0.00011875256,0.00010386013,0.000007412359,0.0001979537,0.007230371,0.0013467708,0.00025250952,0.9807452,0.009953824,0.000018948422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009091898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054268725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03648741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004273687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028007154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19296622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037136899","doi":"10.7202/1069951ar","title":"CONNAISSANCE MORALE ET DOGMATISME","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.04025045925198805,"score_gpt":0.2844940444281234,"score_spread":0.24424358517613537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037136899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02283445,0.016160749,0.033156022,0.1205976,0.0018269306,0.000038852977,0.000117671516,0.00010386783,0.80516386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87304395,0.0059139556,0.007279707,0.010680987,0.0017859375,0.00014127733,0.00011025829,0.00015524522,0.10088874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98957974,0.0058455565,0.00023542387,0.0016053075,0.0018975065,0.0008364083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951603,0.002309066,0.0005451641,0.0007317647,0.00081255956,0.0004412982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059225173,0.0007450737,0.0007076285,0.0013816416,0.005151205,0.010530507,0.0015282086,0.0050663324,0.011375187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007967036,0.00037277,0.00070736086,0.001090711,0.05180259,0.008165511,0.0054210657,0.009769016,0.0017390009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000314135,0.0000028201878,0.000042697575,0.000012503706,0.0000015835594,0.000011724075,0.0007366216,0.000042047475,0.000021039492,0.99719113,0.0010390918,0.000895543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010631266,0.000012254485,0.00029047974,0.00009483636,0.0000037982727,0.000053785487,0.000943549,0.00023491573,0.00010295901,0.8634728,0.13476974,0.000010281365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006433897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004323528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011375187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0096579855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00515873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07007384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037751890","doi":"10.1007/s11229-020-02744-7","title":"Impurism, pragmatic encroachment, and the Argument from Principles","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of science; Metaphysics; Falsity; Philosophy; Philosophy of mind; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06874420071102443,"score_gpt":0.24410333624792097,"score_spread":0.17535913553689653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037751890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038046166,0.017658196,0.08630789,0.14951073,0.001475472,0.00009368418,0.000144505,0.0001251664,0.7066382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96506816,0.0026044578,0.012992324,0.004978116,0.0007099981,0.00017847716,0.00006437217,0.00014353657,0.0132606095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839135,0.01245557,0.00037445992,0.00095764286,0.0016431947,0.00065566984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971019,0.02278003,0.0010924995,0.0032668586,0.0013203588,0.00052119355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0141477175,0.0009222053,0.0013536259,0.0030590685,0.006570506,0.0118457675,0.0030015593,0.008148665,0.006775842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026780961,0.0008332768,0.000698469,0.0027635414,0.07220217,0.022031529,0.006576553,0.010040921,0.00086530467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040999153,0.0000037390291,0.000017245984,0.000023865641,0.0000021600254,0.000013886298,0.0012848306,0.000048893802,0.000010794773,0.99735475,0.00050760584,0.00072819286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006080695,0.0000028803981,0.000051537452,0.00008944861,0.00000313168,0.000022211818,0.001439357,0.000191862,0.000068029316,0.98799884,0.010122964,0.0000037149741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025114755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033057497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0141477175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006420217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061687874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074821174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037879725","doi":"10.1111/cogs.12850","title":"Expert or Esoteric? Philosophers Attribute Knowledge Differently Than All Other Academics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Descriptive knowledge; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.35991246098685536,"score_gpt":0.37126529886756787,"score_spread":0.011352837880712507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037879725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9704554,0.0009769,0.002718924,0.004314708,0.0000737342,0.00004566604,0.000047302256,0.000036296857,0.021331176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954797,0.0006103244,0.00088972185,0.0016251508,0.000057315698,0.00001629096,0.000046137455,0.0000083844525,0.0012669574],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99377054,0.002551857,0.00036837772,0.0007454543,0.002163073,0.00040063498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9633791,0.018756138,0.008508083,0.0039196033,0.0031713804,0.0022656687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069992277,0.00030811972,0.00060778565,0.0028192166,0.002672063,0.0048675374,0.00047475175,0.0019641258,0.0053925514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05353278,0.00036411177,0.0006505669,0.0015569822,0.0053629195,0.006490409,0.0027307137,0.0026220619,0.0009095321],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007275302,0.0007123204,0.53970087,0.0006277112,0.0006784863,0.0016616591,0.25778192,0.0012241303,0.008055434,0.046504736,0.0074035465,0.13492164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001560284,0.00080708927,0.53216064,0.000826671,0.00041511696,0.0051662824,0.2878888,0.003161186,0.0035069163,0.12437439,0.0411919,0.00034498627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022722927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015440866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069992277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010358914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007853433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037015855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038867160","doi":"10.1017/9781316818992.013","title":"The Non-Factive Turn in Epistemology: Some Hypotheses","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Epistemology; Turn (biochemistry); Mathematics education; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05567295360274918,"score_gpt":0.22104805179332532,"score_spread":0.16537509819057614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038867160","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12892532,0.015763184,0.16330929,0.34403968,0.003656284,0.0004666448,0.00060788717,0.00039777101,0.34283403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518103,0.0044724373,0.017262477,0.01066235,0.006397791,0.0005853068,0.00026624714,0.000087895336,0.008455182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989861,0.0063770614,0.00039379616,0.0010915429,0.00159023,0.00068646553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9308588,0.054953177,0.0054197926,0.004024927,0.003106689,0.0016365794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026084678,0.0010804402,0.0011519255,0.0035994772,0.0033922312,0.01168619,0.0042379536,0.0072522066,0.016247055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04248802,0.0006913524,0.001352977,0.0033634976,0.050203606,0.023772292,0.006494688,0.0058842115,0.0017114335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052104853,0.000059535356,0.00084137334,0.00010813059,0.000010625249,0.00016778063,0.0011699429,0.00023060995,0.00006815868,0.99139965,0.0022207638,0.0036712058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029244571,0.00004345087,0.00062112574,0.00011264013,0.000011538485,0.00009101195,0.0012309266,0.0017885887,0.00013094976,0.99174774,0.0041796463,0.000013099467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008979684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046010345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026084678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029112964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017126839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1379506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039638078","doi":"","title":"In Gettier's Wake","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Wake; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Physics; Mechanics","score_opus":0.03054529119385646,"score_gpt":0.2620787002222826,"score_spread":0.23153340902842612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039638078","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0103610335,0.33010373,0.0046277586,0.48287362,0.018734606,0.00005844386,0.000114375915,0.00006992146,0.15305644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56158817,0.14724597,0.0043209833,0.23768261,0.011855866,0.0002107475,0.00021301833,0.00035841667,0.036524158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99074733,0.004700688,0.00051016686,0.0008301739,0.002354881,0.0008566519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865492,0.009879609,0.0006627759,0.00085297035,0.0017670281,0.00028836148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010238328,0.00043453375,0.00048578216,0.003141916,0.0040044715,0.008550897,0.001579688,0.006475234,0.004984856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04060474,0.0003008434,0.0006351894,0.0040005744,0.023604468,0.01682408,0.004559326,0.006951991,0.00075472455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024554329,0.000006363083,0.00017148022,0.00032656192,0.000013774873,0.00023544532,0.009000254,0.00007004096,0.00007096891,0.8380793,0.12950118,0.022500036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011932246,0.000010411838,0.0005418155,0.0016877701,0.000018014869,0.0002697373,0.010823033,0.00008747773,0.0002915606,0.26415813,0.7220801,0.000020047535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073780036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010971337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010238328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003956061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056192237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05414611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040569033","doi":"10.1017/s1755020319000522","title":"KNOWLEDGE, JUSTIFICATION, AND ADEQUATE REASONS","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Symbolic Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Externalism; Axiom; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Possession (linguistics); Axiomatic system; Philosophy; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.15314799005203852,"score_gpt":0.3214384787004625,"score_spread":0.16829048864842397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040569033","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0928166,0.049334526,0.50773954,0.11302133,0.0010313052,0.000104868275,0.00043839202,0.00035772086,0.23515572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97577024,0.0036108762,0.014614179,0.0028872539,0.0004952577,0.000062643376,0.000109414745,0.000036260666,0.0024138992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991707,0.0049085375,0.00053236284,0.0008508242,0.0015756822,0.0004255624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855285,0.010178136,0.0012309821,0.0011933602,0.0014990811,0.0003698575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008132516,0.00050432177,0.0010019314,0.003078942,0.002094873,0.0069973315,0.0013757029,0.004495086,0.003963317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014886903,0.00046106277,0.0010204299,0.0026327693,0.036711734,0.012558496,0.0035339782,0.0047599906,0.00058059284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005376143,0.000003408919,0.00008751823,0.00004764055,0.000007867445,0.000031875825,0.0002530249,0.00019932845,0.0000423854,0.99719244,0.00032770753,0.0018015306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031726847,0.0000028412328,0.00006894518,0.000054435983,0.0000048253623,0.000025871263,0.0001018966,0.0004944626,0.00004910533,0.99711096,0.0020789353,0.0000044128083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020734516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014011313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008132516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004122396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022417938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0430094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043210258","doi":"","title":"The Slippery Business of Measuring Beliefs","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Slippery slope; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14837649731055663,"score_gpt":0.23538422057063976,"score_spread":0.08700772326008313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043210258","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057287816,0.024761273,0.44128478,0.3529003,0.007636105,0.0008655427,0.0020313938,0.0010723739,0.11216041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6482667,0.007039545,0.2811626,0.039662033,0.007435674,0.0030138285,0.0005537258,0.00087380793,0.011992146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7856742,0.14576794,0.009684374,0.010982507,0.046651058,0.0012399491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.25303292,0.61617374,0.020024939,0.07025286,0.036397837,0.0041175806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16320714,0.002050125,0.0036609317,0.0110115195,0.0054111737,0.01499705,0.004885225,0.006900125,0.010108897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6377855,0.00192028,0.0011227893,0.008512522,0.049653515,0.04008035,0.010619269,0.015240526,0.0036393534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036010126,0.000263694,0.018997198,0.0014084853,0.00052835303,0.00013345589,0.009848152,0.0011470169,0.0006823808,0.74701023,0.0427967,0.1768242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006752227,0.00008509785,0.006638377,0.0013900124,0.00007698412,0.00024987973,0.0038374534,0.0027019202,0.00090494315,0.9585875,0.025335032,0.00012515149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056496505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004677729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16320714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047628605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008700537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8631322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047744003","doi":"10.5840/envirophil20201716","title":"Thinking Ecologically, Knowing Responsibly","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Situated; Epistemology; Certainty; Agency (philosophy); Neutrality; Sociology; Order (exchange); Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.08090052525648017,"score_gpt":0.23200156080576492,"score_spread":0.15110103554928475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047744003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04506923,0.0032059392,0.19106765,0.059778783,0.00068788754,0.000074003554,0.00008101861,0.00023181789,0.69980365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.940739,0.0023364632,0.024727242,0.004401118,0.00024059016,0.00012495766,0.00007247972,0.00013662042,0.027221583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958203,0.0022198295,0.00013488886,0.0005240576,0.00087259104,0.00042827343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970331,0.001286366,0.0002510234,0.00065271853,0.00043228298,0.0003445005],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051264497,0.00047100015,0.0005519039,0.0010727216,0.004089522,0.010889716,0.0012612237,0.0033247734,0.004404625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008081807,0.0004423631,0.00066888594,0.00081108534,0.035861548,0.021534419,0.007150605,0.0042835195,0.0012539865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002693078,0.000008855985,0.0002041063,0.00003223323,0.000006908344,0.000041482017,0.0064419787,0.0003142021,0.00021771059,0.9871077,0.001007353,0.004614745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023369623,0.000008038409,0.00013119215,0.00009811435,0.0000070734895,0.00006664479,0.0049858596,0.0002626618,0.00020308084,0.9430836,0.05114152,0.000009822966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024736985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034497364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99591047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025398883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063855182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02711159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3066479015","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12726","title":"There is a distinctively epistemic kind of blame","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"Research Manitoba","keywords":"Blame; Epistemology; Skepticism; Philosophy; Focus (optics); Philosophy of science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.5326447610816943,"score_gpt":0.3799021787370339,"score_spread":0.15274258234466043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3066479015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33812538,0.0016714348,0.18461391,0.08466839,0.0007523114,0.000082046725,0.00010523852,0.00035133542,0.38963002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99492645,0.00008239533,0.0026536086,0.0008477318,0.00003147817,0.000014300653,0.000008457428,0.000019450074,0.0014161671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99108934,0.0050686784,0.00036223192,0.00093124324,0.0016522446,0.00089621893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98465157,0.0069490657,0.002341236,0.0032410957,0.0019480756,0.00086897874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007944891,0.0003626542,0.000600353,0.001250793,0.006322406,0.0065977555,0.0011857107,0.004107826,0.004391538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01576182,0.0004986737,0.0006376821,0.0006583347,0.05482824,0.015602633,0.007783592,0.0065672323,0.0003854072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022320663,0.00003070461,0.0014268482,0.000057320784,0.000013948957,0.00013622874,0.024933172,0.00020859392,0.0005524069,0.96803,0.0010609303,0.0035274157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011301227,0.000023702363,0.0015123137,0.00017075437,0.000011779837,0.00036425376,0.015382066,0.00085706275,0.0006598048,0.9645536,0.016412921,0.00004038966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012481855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012090805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007944891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002983704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028093196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04201716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080724725","doi":"10.1017/s0034412520000323","title":"Mapping the epistemic arguments for religious toleration","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religious Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Epistemology; Conflation; Philosophy; Variety (cybernetics); Philosophy of religion; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.17772830582338434,"score_gpt":0.3097111834898216,"score_spread":0.13198287766643724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080724725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19336767,0.0017177028,0.18480311,0.04840511,0.0006903728,0.000110568086,0.00012280219,0.00014303814,0.5706396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99353725,0.00016718573,0.003934461,0.00059258647,0.00010731627,0.00004201552,0.000013542296,0.000025217954,0.0015803608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98674405,0.009203589,0.00038145814,0.00065426395,0.0024688202,0.0005478223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619193,0.029317433,0.002879303,0.002362846,0.002745386,0.0007756159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010960941,0.00040949913,0.0004859116,0.0038358036,0.0031805495,0.0077521065,0.0013853784,0.0038661961,0.008955408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05045633,0.00030195087,0.0006558589,0.0021353096,0.025188101,0.0106800655,0.0096624335,0.0053027757,0.0007245816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001908842,0.000015822501,0.0001882054,0.000028210909,0.0000051113643,0.000042470438,0.0019420628,0.00010529233,0.00009859053,0.99499595,0.00023678645,0.0023225488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021648271,0.000017816132,0.00062116573,0.00012442855,0.000012240248,0.000056195382,0.0041653155,0.0010775225,0.000459751,0.98610187,0.0073289527,0.00001310677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054860365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040083454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010960941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036582975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014881656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057967663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081735501","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6205","title":"Other-Regarding Virtues and Their Place in Virtue Argumentation Theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Epistemology; Epistemic virtue; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Virtue ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059708128957152884,"score_gpt":0.2543450000964259,"score_spread":0.19463687113927303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081735501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06876873,0.008551375,0.23514996,0.031767663,0.0010582802,0.00008275865,0.00005203027,0.00016009893,0.654409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736988,0.0009993253,0.01671979,0.0012762534,0.00026842434,0.000072839146,0.000023370816,0.000040830502,0.0069001997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99119884,0.0064584115,0.00026136855,0.0005718358,0.0009978983,0.00051164697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877985,0.008193429,0.0009783551,0.0009685138,0.0009901784,0.0010710764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012022639,0.00042338623,0.0008382905,0.0026296498,0.005604655,0.009122024,0.0012765415,0.0037197538,0.0041322173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009348927,0.0003089684,0.0010142651,0.0014953271,0.03902815,0.010847353,0.0055009644,0.0050115823,0.00068704726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033061453,0.000004571065,0.00008316529,0.000013365879,0.0000021609465,0.000018145483,0.0010184855,0.000057449128,0.000016821195,0.99761164,0.00014529093,0.001025562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008763991,0.000009121716,0.00012334897,0.00006153176,0.00000418762,0.00005097257,0.00074073364,0.00067077304,0.00004884294,0.98930794,0.008966768,0.000007168011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008135456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009373463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012022639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002425034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023455236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0635826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082735929","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6214","title":"What is Wrong with Deductivism?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Inference; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.09978874048651296,"score_gpt":0.2585445522149686,"score_spread":0.15875581172845563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082735929","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009625265,0.016640738,0.08642563,0.8093446,0.006085385,0.000046316032,0.00016239143,0.00035793774,0.07131177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.680829,0.017953493,0.049941584,0.21061228,0.020612426,0.00041614106,0.00027866277,0.00095361075,0.018402807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795585,0.01171358,0.0010723552,0.0022338752,0.0044773524,0.0009442632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94693315,0.04003839,0.001780583,0.0046538585,0.0056415973,0.0009524514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035884827,0.00092545635,0.0018462262,0.0028884767,0.006052038,0.01283761,0.0038525737,0.012813883,0.006504211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05340666,0.0006229779,0.0019749796,0.0023356257,0.055750426,0.032473225,0.005572355,0.018395305,0.0027593132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026909303,0.000022490813,0.00018558408,0.00010983817,0.000031526688,0.00005648444,0.00206114,0.00017607567,0.000055420678,0.9794567,0.010852654,0.006965141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017924125,0.0000072856224,0.000043687523,0.00006295774,0.0000047426765,0.000034724962,0.00034764127,0.0002379261,0.000069520924,0.9885725,0.010591006,0.000010047833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002860854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018722374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035884827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00542021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036148364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1897794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082914421","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6172","title":"Resolution of Deep Disagreement: Not Simply Consensus","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Reading (process); Resolution (logic); Common ground; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.11829525222959104,"score_gpt":0.26951155422027623,"score_spread":0.1512163019906852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082914421","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0360967,0.00677178,0.4114479,0.25369972,0.0042867716,0.0002257021,0.00011630132,0.0004220722,0.28693303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8694852,0.0017421389,0.08534941,0.01778131,0.0016613018,0.00031150167,0.00012562146,0.00027811315,0.023265315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9580897,0.026486637,0.0017633353,0.004792214,0.006819809,0.0020483062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94742316,0.030363876,0.004807881,0.009326025,0.0053727687,0.0027062315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039009377,0.00062464556,0.001421531,0.0025137234,0.007239951,0.013622176,0.0032245282,0.00961346,0.00662342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08000265,0.0005534147,0.001069271,0.0016827536,0.03188575,0.02872965,0.015141241,0.01178165,0.0018191532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002159414,0.000012091505,0.0001599168,0.000085003856,0.000030882453,0.00007479533,0.005512948,0.00032903042,0.00019948179,0.9803462,0.004868288,0.008359877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000123739555,0.0000065928066,0.000040436516,0.00007637188,0.000006487444,0.000025212097,0.0011418202,0.0004346715,0.0001722819,0.9755342,0.022537988,0.000011458125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010256134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011057584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039009377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041103116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047023473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20630378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083188059","doi":"10.1007/s11229-020-02844-4","title":"Other minds are neither seen nor inferred","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Attribution; Slogan; Philosophy of science; Mental state; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of mind; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Psychology; State (computer science); Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.14870421228325698,"score_gpt":0.2656107985149932,"score_spread":0.11690658623173622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083188059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044289943,0.0069454187,0.16143356,0.044699125,0.0027581486,0.000105739964,0.0010137237,0.00029076842,0.73846364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90569955,0.0041202814,0.046115637,0.0037909497,0.0007279439,0.00014637104,0.00068786915,0.0002796479,0.038431738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955273,0.0017333954,0.00029780276,0.0012479947,0.0009397274,0.00025383665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99114555,0.0038880387,0.0008030678,0.002409362,0.0013301644,0.0004237411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004286071,0.00062227406,0.0008889506,0.0016634325,0.0032926274,0.010200621,0.0019356092,0.0030586917,0.022946987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017350769,0.0007206385,0.0006639773,0.0012178528,0.022643898,0.021010734,0.0043306854,0.0051610284,0.00404419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003672559,0.000015928903,0.0004137019,0.0002612539,0.000037571925,0.00008217356,0.0047421274,0.0001902672,0.0005451096,0.9798182,0.001818621,0.012038253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018634115,0.000010118775,0.00029491863,0.0003072359,0.000029092407,0.00012530133,0.0037337018,0.00031130164,0.0007123479,0.9422788,0.052159734,0.000018805105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016735643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002093678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022946987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023770833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027779434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0767653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084794170","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3650250","title":"Sustaining Rules: A Model and Application","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.032960499881262116,"score_gpt":0.2808363260069402,"score_spread":0.24787582612567807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084794170","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074159004,0.0015938518,0.5670087,0.015961587,0.00036927688,0.0003034366,0.00043844097,0.00042718436,0.33973855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8820223,0.0010791546,0.0940259,0.0005347029,0.0001818444,0.0003881327,0.00018328111,0.00010670179,0.021478064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982887,0.0006413706,0.00015450503,0.00034675756,0.00035495803,0.00021371937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99269015,0.0044110236,0.00055021443,0.00095532316,0.000870166,0.00052314904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029795591,0.0006131664,0.00076458196,0.0022726192,0.0028150268,0.007881657,0.0032732266,0.0055697,0.013407487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013570381,0.00041825307,0.0012460444,0.0026712853,0.00797706,0.009627753,0.0027968213,0.0024730985,0.0014928593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060637476,0.00001692138,0.00022236381,0.000011919163,0.000003895902,0.000045994537,0.00018946032,0.0037024817,0.000028239212,0.99169594,0.00052891823,0.00354776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011610998,0.000008841356,0.00006702115,0.000015515658,0.0000060554717,0.000033554566,0.00017216404,0.012265816,0.00005201852,0.98316044,0.004200161,0.000006900492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007840769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005602575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013407487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003684683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004524141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044852555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088844768","doi":"","title":"Solving the Contact Paradox: Rational Belief in the Teeth of the Evidence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5577524151402756,"score_gpt":0.5435108853321101,"score_spread":0.01424152980816551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088844768","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11032486,0.011774542,0.17358144,0.43014568,0.0023156754,0.00011956422,0.0002561126,0.00017807221,0.27130413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95241463,0.002969151,0.023304377,0.010519805,0.001752339,0.000099944,0.00008157114,0.00008237509,0.008775806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98856163,0.006918299,0.00055808015,0.0014638316,0.0020837004,0.00041436264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9284569,0.060632173,0.0032913494,0.0035125979,0.0028101974,0.001296909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017743835,0.0004081997,0.00100826,0.0016316203,0.0038640704,0.009673523,0.0020887672,0.0074496525,0.0064932047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06775506,0.00050396664,0.0006747063,0.0015360665,0.026629027,0.021884825,0.0055683986,0.009903365,0.0007530872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003160792,0.000013561222,0.000280722,0.000068976515,0.000015607086,0.00020075255,0.0014624808,0.00030175177,0.00011617214,0.9893321,0.0029547333,0.0052215983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017448736,0.0000058740593,0.00014722605,0.00003137728,0.000004543946,0.00007570883,0.00035799667,0.0008775383,0.00008589667,0.9935998,0.004788597,0.000007994063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013357035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010092821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017743835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033653951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028764396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093839526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094278271","doi":"10.1093/analys/anaa035","title":"Moderate pragmatic invariantism and contextual implicature cancellation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Implicature; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Pragmatics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05170688961517459,"score_gpt":0.25555054870121413,"score_spread":0.20384365908603955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094278271","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15581922,0.000874201,0.4188721,0.014054367,0.00046475022,0.00017635146,0.0002480232,0.00076826167,0.40872282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98730403,0.000072851246,0.009189042,0.00049338274,0.0000912547,0.000059039565,0.000041007363,0.00007979631,0.0026695302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868891,0.0073429635,0.0005616047,0.0016730657,0.0023691119,0.0011640715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98564076,0.009087475,0.0008786284,0.0025093586,0.0014197711,0.00046405054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009160399,0.00059272296,0.00082483736,0.0014969847,0.0037370936,0.0055235205,0.0022241191,0.0024210636,0.00854381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019773284,0.0006683115,0.0010678656,0.0009931566,0.022284912,0.00823396,0.0072956015,0.0055630594,0.0006670458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014389358,0.0000065044364,0.00013221725,0.000021799322,0.000006027944,0.0000573913,0.0017443368,0.00015635275,0.00023010439,0.9958008,0.0003312729,0.0014988421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014111823,0.000010264945,0.00022123226,0.00002758898,0.000015272479,0.00006170207,0.0012045616,0.0016804256,0.00060482486,0.9884312,0.0077132345,0.000015660233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028551368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020940206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009160399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043794853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022112706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048445404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094539809","doi":"10.1111/theo.12288","title":"False Beliefs and Misleading Evidence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Normative; Doxastic logic; Psychology; Epistemology; False accusation; Scientific evidence; Positive economics; Social psychology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.17747749986801842,"score_gpt":0.2908205842105531,"score_spread":0.1133430843425347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094539809","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062326875,0.024872417,0.22155944,0.35101092,0.00516113,0.00017732353,0.0006395779,0.00031825042,0.33393407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94535726,0.0048084226,0.019342922,0.021188974,0.0021553955,0.00010604686,0.00014326493,0.000094554096,0.00680318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9578489,0.027556706,0.0024853582,0.0033382855,0.007587982,0.0011827644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7595801,0.19763108,0.012462154,0.013889313,0.013930075,0.0025072906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02914222,0.0009515392,0.0012558552,0.0060372152,0.004300125,0.011423492,0.0027740968,0.010414067,0.00893896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14042443,0.0009816651,0.00079379,0.0031604262,0.05815999,0.023471465,0.006347954,0.011144608,0.0010858745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022512517,0.000009748408,0.0004973388,0.0001369024,0.000028482926,0.0002733494,0.0020509947,0.00019706595,0.00006993324,0.98941714,0.0035215218,0.0037749028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001296441,0.000007824942,0.00016273727,0.00029344126,0.00002323144,0.0002579386,0.00071096513,0.00048662437,0.000203672,0.9865133,0.01131161,0.000015677439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022213927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014327201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02914222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057298634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028060847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15412062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3103247259","doi":"","title":"The Therapeutic Value of Intellectual Virtue","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Red Deer Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Character (mathematics); Deception; Value (mathematics); Character traits; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4138537470222998,"score_gpt":0.5388305111534157,"score_spread":0.12497676413111591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3103247259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030700149,0.009592954,0.029926486,0.045009773,0.00077360246,0.00004793543,0.000020469934,0.00009647367,0.8838321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779139,0.0019665915,0.0045323987,0.0025744603,0.00043784734,0.000055875487,0.000009488597,0.000026162654,0.012483284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940661,0.0043051024,0.0001023526,0.00027372382,0.000813675,0.00043898495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955051,0.0023812444,0.0005191812,0.00066137675,0.00039090577,0.0005422044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051262793,0.00029097142,0.00030873663,0.001325891,0.0039376863,0.0078523485,0.00078994164,0.0028820606,0.003845458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065172887,0.00014929632,0.0003145096,0.00047821747,0.039353527,0.0050640595,0.005599518,0.0043045003,0.0006618756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007644616,0.000014974471,0.00013705205,0.000034467586,0.0000023106998,0.000057711444,0.001942242,0.00008021462,0.000106158725,0.9880825,0.000887817,0.008646906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013462571,0.00004133805,0.000395124,0.00019050916,0.0000056575336,0.0004451797,0.0023312506,0.0004704484,0.00046772376,0.93715096,0.058475666,0.000012667146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036354605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045819167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078523485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027750758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027947049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027110696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107385141","doi":"10.1007/s10677-020-10142-8","title":"Thinking the Right Way (at the Right Time) about Virtues and Skills","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of medicine; Political philosophy; Ontology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Politics; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.030316566703023597,"score_gpt":0.28736537289053204,"score_spread":0.25704880618750847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107385141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031164905,0.0073068384,0.19917324,0.29114693,0.0024386414,0.0001214882,0.00012966486,0.00020727767,0.46831095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91275525,0.0028737376,0.05571513,0.012573691,0.0010918202,0.00017499036,0.0000649634,0.00014983957,0.014600552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860659,0.009382282,0.00043777755,0.0011765392,0.002141435,0.00079592795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812036,0.010795277,0.0014784149,0.0021691828,0.002606548,0.0017470238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01582177,0.0005118511,0.0009911059,0.0018342503,0.0049860533,0.013612146,0.0014130407,0.005842342,0.005574763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02592308,0.00044773007,0.0006001985,0.00093648845,0.052571863,0.014256125,0.003832272,0.01208448,0.0012032664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054164784,0.000012439897,0.00021429853,0.000032871234,0.0000064905075,0.000027857312,0.0027088337,0.00015204203,0.00011839441,0.98877174,0.0021333334,0.005816234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041848652,0.000004036962,0.0001924213,0.00007363973,0.0000024437916,0.00003254137,0.0013389086,0.00019858338,0.00012485737,0.9864862,0.011532944,0.000009271629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023734977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023266696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01582177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035739527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010816214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08367449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112963609","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2020.4.8168","title":"Mansplaining and Illocutionary Force","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Focus (optics); Speech act; Linguistics; Psychology; Sociology; Communication; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.06789706391376149,"score_gpt":0.24350105982562917,"score_spread":0.17560399591186768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112963609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2010436,0.0021558567,0.19460353,0.015907591,0.0003904074,0.00021996521,0.00005522849,0.00030292082,0.5853209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793179,0.00021018794,0.0049868026,0.0007325778,0.00008490343,0.00009547433,0.000019729243,0.000056973695,0.014495521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98672104,0.0066962135,0.0006862204,0.0016766122,0.0028065855,0.0014133437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886874,0.005799311,0.0014803822,0.0022281972,0.0012778033,0.0005269856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010584567,0.00087884424,0.00047111147,0.0014892386,0.0061122254,0.004866103,0.0015446483,0.003504446,0.0044193645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016416585,0.00045246034,0.0006530318,0.00079061446,0.049233794,0.009134446,0.008546993,0.0048992927,0.0006871609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011093203,0.0000062449103,0.00026678742,0.000023783015,0.0000036611345,0.00010426703,0.01291423,0.0001304478,0.00046388718,0.98275065,0.0002958525,0.0030291767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021619157,0.00006243659,0.0009599749,0.00021147905,0.000017729617,0.0003977265,0.015991947,0.0014778402,0.002862679,0.8883328,0.089610465,0.000053328502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002306774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017656771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010584567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035067727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002533625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055977166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116995137","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i4.6070","title":"Putting Reasons in their Place","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Reflection (computer programming); Cognition; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.11057870179605298,"score_gpt":0.2589531819822904,"score_spread":0.14837448018623742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116995137","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019901838,0.019737387,0.23304112,0.3092175,0.013239827,0.00016229323,0.00025118433,0.00054002024,0.4039088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84236336,0.005787595,0.08341754,0.026530022,0.0039556543,0.00036882426,0.00020822123,0.00063185615,0.03673684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97475636,0.016437095,0.0012926945,0.0026093281,0.0035111008,0.0013934483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9527115,0.031416196,0.002361932,0.0064854687,0.005417081,0.0016077288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02899926,0.0013717075,0.0016727399,0.004859861,0.008200632,0.02188488,0.002794338,0.013416509,0.0090444535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053235687,0.0011145603,0.0017451297,0.0019953668,0.07654931,0.042263027,0.011110125,0.013457547,0.0026447212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012175654,0.0000051202665,0.0001025667,0.000042332213,0.000011102267,0.000052839026,0.0028658588,0.00010414762,0.000039601106,0.9912423,0.0023613663,0.0031605545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012088219,0.0000066651633,0.000060035007,0.00016491774,0.000010410168,0.000039670536,0.0020765716,0.00018888035,0.00010805765,0.9369341,0.06037983,0.00001885142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002422341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002959785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02899926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057984763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069158175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15336454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120664428","doi":"10.3917/rphi.211.0033","title":"Common Sense in Reid’s Response to Scepticism","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue philosophique de la France et de l étranger","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05124387955630529,"score_gpt":0.331619542929662,"score_spread":0.28037566337335673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120664428","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042724352,0.015802646,0.02821274,0.64266247,0.006762945,0.00007180412,0.00018094489,0.0002338472,0.26334828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88552904,0.003970367,0.0045334077,0.06401596,0.0029779612,0.00017330637,0.000062475505,0.00025464405,0.03848281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96398264,0.023994677,0.0014618322,0.0036547987,0.0053552412,0.0015508707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9467863,0.038605746,0.0038146602,0.0045294664,0.005196192,0.0010676372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023028143,0.0008963964,0.0007797297,0.0037695195,0.009451331,0.009436303,0.0034520861,0.013531723,0.0060390695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0648903,0.0006194031,0.0010500301,0.0042375694,0.05154089,0.017126702,0.0089436965,0.014183643,0.0012954935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030489407,0.0000053463523,0.0003804888,0.000082787796,0.000013185073,0.0003502457,0.045853857,0.000105208666,0.00008114133,0.9193292,0.02946823,0.004299747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003431934,0.000027140104,0.0007421037,0.00043019908,0.000020594813,0.00062163523,0.03568898,0.00041076908,0.0004938216,0.5532682,0.40817598,0.00008634614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00773668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006580398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023028143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014063831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004507813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12178594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121936961","doi":"","title":"Investigating the Shared Background Required for Argument: A Critique of Fogelin's Thesis on Deep Disagreement","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.0819047116214753,"score_gpt":0.29310964403998846,"score_spread":0.21120493241851315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121936961","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077908285,0.008580469,0.14379378,0.43931544,0.0015360449,0.00019395447,0.00016721117,0.00033009605,0.32817477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9485577,0.0012720289,0.021158729,0.020985747,0.0014214807,0.00041250524,0.0000658483,0.00020834271,0.0059176087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747456,0.013781711,0.00087840983,0.003471229,0.00576328,0.0013597269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93001914,0.056624193,0.0030712644,0.005004074,0.0035980782,0.0016832383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027271809,0.0008287947,0.0017563249,0.0056231604,0.011089445,0.014216309,0.0060620513,0.01855404,0.0041428134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07450851,0.00084551406,0.0015062217,0.004550106,0.07192151,0.029879421,0.0146453595,0.017600283,0.001027402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013031687,0.0000069658454,0.00006873785,0.000024902654,0.000006701078,0.00007214129,0.0066885836,0.000106633874,0.000038031918,0.9890288,0.0014403085,0.0025051925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025007466,0.0000060223924,0.000106633976,0.00008244295,0.000007168901,0.000048915987,0.0012497207,0.0004520018,0.00007702791,0.9863171,0.011617875,0.000010189781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042843167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022837222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027271809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011272067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008050544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14422882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124226346","doi":"10.1017/9781316827413.014","title":"Experimental Epistemology and “Gettier” Cases","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07021174378295578,"score_gpt":0.23436535633234665,"score_spread":0.16415361254939087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124226346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.114990786,0.011414274,0.0900222,0.042561177,0.0019471033,0.00048676395,0.00020981481,0.00021851709,0.73814934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403554,0.004538722,0.029209547,0.009762848,0.0006933404,0.0008823628,0.00028644514,0.00021602948,0.014055296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95268095,0.03335948,0.002403794,0.0024349177,0.008241424,0.00087941973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86269987,0.11510858,0.0039464403,0.013694138,0.0037148546,0.00083615206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030531524,0.000669845,0.00081498036,0.0024854217,0.004133438,0.00803773,0.0023277435,0.004521627,0.0162176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.099804156,0.0007168323,0.00077375496,0.002211461,0.035591833,0.020822786,0.007262465,0.0070639527,0.001109019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027823631,0.00005521224,0.00048275955,0.00018816836,0.000009982244,0.00009545571,0.004545958,0.00010907707,0.00020101682,0.9835254,0.0016281175,0.009131087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004948618,0.000056935438,0.0009894377,0.00048995554,0.000014738206,0.00030869222,0.005630307,0.00056522,0.0013648036,0.9391241,0.051378753,0.000027520942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043837645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046752562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030531524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033278912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011985913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16146809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124357432","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/m5yw4","title":"Is Probabilistic Evidence a Source of Knowledge","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Probabilistic logic; Denial; Psychology; Perception; Social psychology; Trustworthiness; Population; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Sociology","score_opus":0.2398368034321854,"score_gpt":0.31552042742824693,"score_spread":0.07568362399606152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124357432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43135867,0.0068151983,0.27388185,0.064104624,0.00070543686,0.00018668016,0.00047794898,0.00040144453,0.22206818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98217255,0.0012300247,0.01330944,0.0015249833,0.00023443867,0.000049329676,0.00015011487,0.00005057063,0.0012786209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9763375,0.011503862,0.0012320498,0.002694483,0.007478574,0.00075348397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69805837,0.22855072,0.02403375,0.0363037,0.010812202,0.0022412387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022367002,0.00046099816,0.00084614236,0.0031517986,0.0015418585,0.0076783663,0.0018011754,0.0044072587,0.01110307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21147476,0.0011719263,0.00080908835,0.0020431138,0.011332539,0.02596405,0.0048991414,0.0035684996,0.0015273584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001038171,0.00041157354,0.039657332,0.0026554437,0.0008631848,0.0014840476,0.02515696,0.003984986,0.007485371,0.6628618,0.0053032627,0.2490978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001322251,0.00018272504,0.009737188,0.0008215569,0.000311931,0.001438843,0.0039974414,0.0049324287,0.004663176,0.94399035,0.029691558,0.00010046663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006533627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036345303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022367002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011701443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013367763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11828941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125584685","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4544","title":"On There Being Wide Reflective Equilibria: Why it is Important to Put it in the Plural","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Coherentism; Normative; Generality; Epistemology; Morality; Sociology; Political philosophy; Politics; Liberalism; Reflective equilibrium; Philosophy; Law; Foundationalism; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.11873980687484718,"score_gpt":0.3390400621543505,"score_spread":0.2203002552795033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125584685","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016500654,0.018400272,0.17512922,0.49129117,0.0035780862,0.000108628155,0.00019971794,0.00036129702,0.29443094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8152739,0.007919581,0.06040463,0.059945792,0.004112056,0.0003809644,0.00016289194,0.00096696103,0.050833285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810177,0.01068527,0.0006987663,0.0030315071,0.0030059342,0.0015607718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97291857,0.01525126,0.0014294449,0.004387571,0.0046747294,0.0013383728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02170913,0.00089572964,0.0015290049,0.002156729,0.010433195,0.017104138,0.0031083713,0.0118492395,0.012898149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048641752,0.00067993975,0.0011850095,0.0023957198,0.057223294,0.049970545,0.010539757,0.012863323,0.0036808879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057824996,0.0000039107176,0.00008080403,0.000024209601,0.0000036634299,0.000022635277,0.0016457954,0.00006101322,0.00002090903,0.9908791,0.0037447198,0.0035074388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005396821,0.000003353277,0.000047243368,0.000057173314,0.0000021370352,0.00003350542,0.0010091319,0.00014050484,0.00004113145,0.9772499,0.021401068,0.000009361233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004235065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048618265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02170913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00511636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004340438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11481023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125589595","doi":"","title":"Abduction and Inference to the Best Explanation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Epistemology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11107736316115657,"score_gpt":0.3001762207104441,"score_spread":0.1890988575492875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125589595","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03311662,0.011397661,0.826074,0.054020688,0.0008312106,0.00014666287,0.0005851931,0.00034679894,0.07348112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79516745,0.003711617,0.19020724,0.002505271,0.0013544065,0.00028534973,0.0007438626,0.0001572632,0.0058675646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9774146,0.016764717,0.0011263756,0.0022164087,0.0018471782,0.0006307924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89870125,0.08603085,0.0022908081,0.009569274,0.0027355799,0.00067218574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021020006,0.0013529112,0.0029316342,0.0053465567,0.0030954692,0.007921387,0.004549652,0.005185783,0.010136792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10137572,0.0012671177,0.0034773466,0.003324922,0.02396489,0.017696816,0.0067692352,0.0067329635,0.0008925518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007691551,0.000026400452,0.0003159249,0.00020111247,0.00011711706,0.00007886201,0.00052024634,0.0053600953,0.00005928839,0.98109996,0.0019429685,0.010201113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009215432,0.0000016100879,0.000028300548,0.000025903113,0.000007928661,0.000009820429,0.000049465038,0.002957399,0.000039770923,0.99614346,0.00072271604,0.000004275316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005373993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004154111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021020006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004650605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004373696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11116576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127872091","doi":"10.1017/9781108379755.004","title":"The Psychological Dimension of the Lottery Paradox","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Epistemology; Odds; Skepticism; Realm; Rationality; Ticket; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.06776773083546732,"score_gpt":0.2308368106266343,"score_spread":0.16306907979116697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127872091","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031070314,0.016395234,0.056483503,0.08301499,0.0009908926,0.000046084984,0.00013544237,0.00006771056,0.81179583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9414253,0.0052266344,0.013580791,0.008865189,0.0010365557,0.00018986665,0.000076863995,0.0000671204,0.029531691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964914,0.001988082,0.000082575156,0.00029655488,0.00096857006,0.00017274864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99592847,0.0029485214,0.00019981511,0.00041248754,0.0002972615,0.0002134283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003893722,0.00038177022,0.00043834528,0.0011198347,0.0024997033,0.007799823,0.0009822681,0.003426514,0.004424472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063825757,0.00038325338,0.00036186748,0.0012524776,0.041488055,0.012221976,0.0031865933,0.007322823,0.0005392337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028027853,0.0000035761302,0.000027920754,0.000010109652,0.000001296846,0.000013526856,0.0002715501,0.00006767693,0.00002567842,0.997632,0.00079880597,0.0011450211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002145452,0.0000013777562,0.000050203373,0.000014115518,7.0872613e-7,0.000024540617,0.00014862332,0.00012628964,0.000016539107,0.99395305,0.0056599015,0.000002551055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011970624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011970658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007799823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003843471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002656428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02788645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128175181","doi":"10.5840/cpsem20194","title":"Conceiving the Inconceivability of Conceivability","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Semiotics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.07010020022249425,"score_gpt":0.261892786582268,"score_spread":0.19179258635977375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128175181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024096834,0.018794805,0.21019855,0.07446366,0.0021912493,0.0000646131,0.00018509325,0.00023094485,0.6697743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90516037,0.0059770835,0.036249567,0.005833596,0.0019285671,0.00031591448,0.00017453144,0.00047905857,0.043881364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918976,0.005497099,0.00024225068,0.00085771066,0.0011854531,0.00031976667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831139,0.011900107,0.0004933205,0.0030539834,0.0011003228,0.000338418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010980043,0.00089787005,0.0012145883,0.002378118,0.0041807387,0.012763254,0.0023679887,0.0047234125,0.0072778827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021919928,0.0008323245,0.0007689283,0.0012511201,0.072542906,0.031446703,0.006646069,0.012137194,0.0015546113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022564582,0.0000018997368,0.000013397363,0.000008225148,0.0000010192394,0.000006880815,0.00033101844,0.000044160544,0.000016070642,0.99842453,0.000371524,0.00077895116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022319375,0.0000012150061,0.000007951115,0.000015234994,8.826512e-7,0.000012913357,0.0001585075,0.000105134386,0.000031049876,0.99471694,0.004946053,0.0000018754084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012584422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011013577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012763254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038927456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033661518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058068693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129561315","doi":"10.1515/krt-2019-330305","title":"Letting the Truth Out: Children, Naive Truth, and Deflationism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Falsity; Epistemology; Pragmatic theory of truth; Philosophy; Focus (optics); Norm (philosophy); Representation (politics); Reading (process); Coherence theory of truth; Linguistics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0385749328108841,"score_gpt":0.2490922352097897,"score_spread":0.2105173023989056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129561315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88271475,0.004781198,0.009908617,0.0112548,0.000102289414,0.00003793497,0.00016009388,0.00013411266,0.090906225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651355,0.0005770708,0.0013686916,0.00023408944,0.000011039064,0.000011939306,0.000020433179,0.0000131142515,0.0012500127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846965,0.00065450976,0.00008493544,0.00022315599,0.0003419184,0.00022565582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99291706,0.0048974096,0.0010081582,0.0003702282,0.0004857731,0.0003213843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038564843,0.00028225034,0.0004410973,0.001002553,0.0015995313,0.0042827446,0.00044516963,0.0017357293,0.004355042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010310358,0.00037920955,0.00028759125,0.00049850426,0.013246236,0.0053645554,0.0027000525,0.0027647233,0.00041555145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001734972,0.00015933624,0.043427132,0.00028703353,0.00002547712,0.0034333179,0.35068002,0.0004960519,0.005152477,0.5419406,0.003995501,0.050229512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008819464,0.00028371002,0.06350596,0.0010558139,0.00009493394,0.005900514,0.13258861,0.0016541457,0.0072803446,0.61239165,0.17496806,0.00018807553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041938457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049431943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004355042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015909745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001028694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020395279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131748492","doi":"10.1007/s43545-021-00070-4","title":"On moral equivalence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SN Social Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Deliberation; Epistemology; Logical equivalence; Social psychology; Politics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Political science; Pure mathematics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.2608433413644697,"score_gpt":0.3608877721005691,"score_spread":0.10004443073609942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131748492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01368557,0.010602598,0.06225835,0.04498926,0.0022416043,0.00006848032,0.0002131217,0.00007182353,0.86586916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.854666,0.005450488,0.02759295,0.014207887,0.0046985247,0.00041036206,0.0004061401,0.00027518475,0.0922925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954116,0.0024679701,0.00014882027,0.000814405,0.00079762726,0.00035960466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943329,0.0038214268,0.00020497594,0.0007079035,0.00070689723,0.00022589583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005517633,0.00067480246,0.0012002501,0.002450558,0.0056093824,0.0050173183,0.0014148927,0.003737346,0.017471306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015760297,0.00039400614,0.0011140339,0.0014991859,0.021046972,0.011711915,0.0045604734,0.009870395,0.0018095417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022135148,0.0000034526454,0.000017736098,0.0000056530657,0.0000014102277,0.000003982651,0.000115193,0.00003089159,0.000007523141,0.99791795,0.0010765041,0.0008175643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024596307,0.0000016044551,0.000028908204,0.0000101474425,9.985355e-7,0.000004693179,0.00005332805,0.000080916165,0.000010701106,0.99449193,0.0053131194,0.0000011058493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002784323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017056154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017471306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00389385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017654604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05844736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131993214","doi":"10.1002/tht3.473","title":"Surprise, surprise: KK is innocent","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Surprise; Analogy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Blame; Counterintuitive; Wright; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science; History; Social psychology; Art history","score_opus":0.08003400529711314,"score_gpt":0.2827868260427748,"score_spread":0.20275282074566164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131993214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06264551,0.006002367,0.14383164,0.22482084,0.0039016749,0.000078513585,0.00020909678,0.000676044,0.5578343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.940491,0.0010223063,0.009693902,0.020389404,0.0009136912,0.00008852501,0.00005174898,0.00029142344,0.02705797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99464816,0.002353665,0.00025615725,0.0011076545,0.0010935115,0.0005409424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98618096,0.009136295,0.0009721918,0.0016337703,0.0014340288,0.0006427328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006198048,0.00053283,0.00077587215,0.00086518016,0.004394896,0.0073099714,0.001215356,0.005367467,0.007051201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029947298,0.0005114546,0.00084799994,0.00055119896,0.023452848,0.020392293,0.0059776804,0.00894119,0.0014376965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004420736,0.000008924807,0.00025300798,0.000056593755,0.000008420123,0.0002533484,0.0030478986,0.00019910651,0.0001696111,0.9810425,0.0100943865,0.0048219864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130210055,0.000014219858,0.00020906614,0.00004752976,0.000008369706,0.0002532061,0.0010847523,0.0006022032,0.00026563345,0.9694177,0.02806592,0.000018376068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034656774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020583987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073099714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00391938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031383275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0327788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134221673","doi":"10.1007/s10781-021-09461-6","title":"Gaṅgeśa on Epistemic Luck","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Indian Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Localism; Luck; Epistemology; Event (particle physics); Philosophy of religion; Judgement; Hindsight bias; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06350312864739766,"score_gpt":0.266998458694861,"score_spread":0.20349533004746334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134221673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0704393,0.0059800954,0.013805386,0.02254935,0.00052425644,0.000045682547,0.000054823136,0.00009891324,0.8865022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96286666,0.0015828068,0.0020799215,0.0015804515,0.00010938389,0.00006086348,0.000014646865,0.000040999206,0.031664304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984931,0.0008278539,0.000051608182,0.00023227392,0.00022770574,0.00016737038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979101,0.0012572319,0.00011295923,0.00032073478,0.0002841019,0.00011485127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002324581,0.00023546696,0.00052432914,0.00061491254,0.0049548578,0.0045777303,0.0005325919,0.00117842,0.004866235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041454346,0.00023352362,0.00027613263,0.00062172156,0.017342918,0.0046683983,0.0062621674,0.004923758,0.0007195512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011565182,0.0000071396307,0.00013258516,0.000032256747,0.000002247296,0.00009624577,0.004289003,0.00009902923,0.00008960396,0.99126107,0.00095058547,0.003028808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000108082395,0.000020195317,0.00051353604,0.00016370481,0.0000134178235,0.00018898476,0.0031641251,0.0005662764,0.000494487,0.86486423,0.12998019,0.000020096526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034468605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032906735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049548578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003792787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023917868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02751875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134735527","doi":"10.1111/theo.12310","title":"Should Acknowledgments in Published Academic Articles Include Gratitude for Reviewers Who Reviewed for Journals that Rejected Those Articles?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universitetet i Oslo; Ryerson University","keywords":"Gratitude; Argument (complex analysis); Publishing; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2973672460105159,"score_gpt":0.4024448103015438,"score_spread":0.10507756429102788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134735527","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12395964,0.03769937,0.013971537,0.6838375,0.095785804,0.0011539921,0.0015313505,0.0015000999,0.040560786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7319096,0.0147094745,0.018308869,0.16272436,0.049151085,0.0015430223,0.0006210844,0.001084591,0.019947894],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7935857,0.111286275,0.038034227,0.008272164,0.043438055,0.0053835902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.114158995,0.33742434,0.23127241,0.029912375,0.26825604,0.018975854],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16484046,0.0007086016,0.001590754,0.005873229,0.005743411,0.017261162,0.0028900069,0.0076993876,0.01042294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.68750757,0.00090067537,0.00069683767,0.0071588866,0.006171407,0.01403809,0.004115046,0.004550438,0.0071132774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000871421,0.00022123555,0.09103525,0.010084285,0.0005253124,0.002417245,0.088726,0.00016165283,0.007079059,0.018801069,0.63845164,0.14162591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019558401,0.0003769179,0.06814006,0.009109365,0.00033308662,0.0022323981,0.080448136,0.00053727493,0.0044010496,0.012794893,0.820797,0.0006341946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011558039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018041339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83515954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044312864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011576871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8717701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137284872","doi":"10.1007/s11229-020-03007-1","title":"Pathways of influence: understanding the impact of philosophy of science in scientific domains","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Metaphysics; Face (sociological concept); Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Work (physics); Philosophy of computer science; Science education; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Western philosophy; Social science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.12849002577294788,"score_gpt":0.31074139899676945,"score_spread":0.18225137322382157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137284872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23611408,0.008299774,0.1289242,0.06422775,0.00052672636,0.00025705577,0.00041189155,0.00028096305,0.5609576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99052155,0.0012969718,0.0057833632,0.00044769706,0.00005962245,0.00008793981,0.000036864807,0.00009752643,0.0016684289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860096,0.010511993,0.00025334276,0.0010556286,0.0014361581,0.0007333436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9391662,0.048908852,0.0028314295,0.0030367144,0.0033419107,0.0027149078],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016461264,0.0005742698,0.0007189785,0.005071267,0.0049682194,0.01747892,0.0019428837,0.0030061216,0.009910426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05858475,0.00059226074,0.0005983795,0.0039416756,0.03958692,0.025871908,0.009463038,0.004404947,0.00070167973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006689796,0.000023549623,0.0022536903,0.000117714655,0.000029666182,0.000066101304,0.01349754,0.00076558697,0.00019949506,0.9730768,0.0003836013,0.009519342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022468872,0.000015263751,0.0012832871,0.00012758555,0.00002617959,0.000028599155,0.006918637,0.00090610766,0.00026191116,0.9775033,0.012895563,0.000011067475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059770285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051448145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9950318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009252762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012736988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08705652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142413089","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3652620","title":"Experimental Evidence that Knowledge Entails Justification","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1677429648881246,"score_gpt":0.32351638326987187,"score_spread":0.15577341838174727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142413089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61041653,0.0019893926,0.015048884,0.016675094,0.00087712845,0.00037260648,0.001060232,0.00011611529,0.35344398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98914915,0.0005397112,0.0029222588,0.0010669206,0.00018078493,0.000178991,0.00030757804,0.000050576607,0.005604036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944047,0.0027328448,0.0004400731,0.0011263652,0.0010487225,0.00024727755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7463413,0.20364948,0.015388671,0.026530141,0.0060760025,0.0020144477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008979168,0.00071869144,0.0005953336,0.0010296332,0.0011075975,0.0027501804,0.0013533476,0.0034911893,0.0751956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090225615,0.0006854316,0.00047721976,0.0008691524,0.006483427,0.0054617915,0.0020173965,0.0027476822,0.0028315536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012501796,0.01003313,0.018718736,0.0033906791,0.0006882368,0.0010181405,0.005885516,0.0027320017,0.02577241,0.8492839,0.011896566,0.058078926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046857675,0.0024415874,0.030568782,0.00058692956,0.00054516055,0.0011940555,0.002077053,0.0048067835,0.01193677,0.9093627,0.031665817,0.00012863668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085048465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000787756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0751956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013400039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013625965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25155437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3144906648","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/mp5na","title":"Epistemic Contextualism: An Idle Hypothesis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Contextualism; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Test (biology); Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.24907631227824356,"score_gpt":0.27443819424763527,"score_spread":0.02536188196939171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3144906648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35370135,0.0033336363,0.23008874,0.09721459,0.0008211893,0.00031677395,0.0005454331,0.0005088647,0.31346935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893072,0.0002996422,0.007184271,0.001387169,0.00023149214,0.000112021735,0.000069836635,0.000048322734,0.0013598776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98237544,0.0096946135,0.0008568197,0.0032288288,0.0027432588,0.0011010703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93198526,0.050615624,0.003494481,0.00944204,0.0030434383,0.0014192554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018536126,0.00058810634,0.0011387386,0.0019381709,0.002996187,0.0059177247,0.0022661209,0.0041800304,0.00995434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04906358,0.00069113565,0.0010150244,0.0011785749,0.04476468,0.022557434,0.009277761,0.0056540826,0.0008364597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083506864,0.000027462633,0.000693486,0.000085281,0.000012551912,0.00012438025,0.0026505962,0.00018923193,0.00030183455,0.99134725,0.0006014822,0.0038829504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050295737,0.000027514623,0.00071654754,0.000060751965,0.000016287422,0.00009865984,0.0011813105,0.00097160187,0.00041963052,0.99193466,0.00450596,0.000016760205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011593137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006156012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018536126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023568112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021762548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098029554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146535767","doi":"","title":"It's What's on the Inside that Counts … or is it? Virtue and the Psychological Criteria of Modesty","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Extant taxon; Epistemology; Psychology; State (computer science); Mental state; Folk psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13026000781159647,"score_gpt":0.35186920592041354,"score_spread":0.22160919810881707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146535767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29261994,0.0019913432,0.06403809,0.060007878,0.0007269925,0.00006667347,0.00016084734,0.00017413021,0.58021414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990716,0.00021148981,0.004581445,0.0012028195,0.000082214414,0.00003352301,0.00002269139,0.000038753315,0.003111141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644285,0.0021126755,0.00009912638,0.00046597177,0.0006448576,0.00023442581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920923,0.0042207325,0.0010827155,0.001245087,0.00086741016,0.0004917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003973166,0.00020733279,0.00047920266,0.00054791465,0.0024235882,0.0033637115,0.0004706985,0.0009979137,0.0043126605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013695757,0.00017272402,0.0003212218,0.0006015758,0.025008881,0.005274875,0.0017989203,0.002440629,0.000671956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009558193,0.000033413,0.0042127543,0.00009739492,0.000017187176,0.00007645643,0.0081980415,0.00015027141,0.0011648467,0.9710863,0.004147636,0.010720192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027080663,0.000099366065,0.010367086,0.00015695082,0.000023654306,0.0002496717,0.0071555884,0.0011644684,0.0011568629,0.931339,0.04821397,0.000046337005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010941665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011851985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043126605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011149351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009815341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021012366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147097235","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/mfhez","title":"Knowledge and the Norm of Assertion: A Simple Test","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Simple (philosophy); Observational study; Test (biology); Epistemology; Body of knowledge; Computer science; Mathematics; Knowledge management; Statistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.087830275459607,"score_gpt":0.27611174403941074,"score_spread":0.18828146857980374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147097235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5715806,0.0019171666,0.075949654,0.028595362,0.0013977617,0.00042055504,0.0017760316,0.0003496338,0.31801322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916339,0.00017556864,0.0041362685,0.0010870436,0.00042764022,0.0001788722,0.00028981647,0.000039256447,0.0020315864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9703629,0.014239244,0.0014940904,0.0052118306,0.0073068845,0.0013849543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66113573,0.29006657,0.015198812,0.016331632,0.013301089,0.003966108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024587628,0.0008553593,0.0018902484,0.002309539,0.002263091,0.004961353,0.004064814,0.004005746,0.03839937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19524093,0.00038489923,0.0016997682,0.0022522449,0.019222282,0.026683487,0.008365206,0.0032887612,0.0029994207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002134618,0.00050694775,0.036397282,0.0009788458,0.0006159988,0.0005876156,0.0036677306,0.0018789402,0.0009953694,0.90839314,0.0051999446,0.03864375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005770225,0.0009293796,0.023905091,0.000296464,0.00033089353,0.0004081394,0.0039128526,0.013726626,0.0011802667,0.9423994,0.012200333,0.00013355365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016808602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053464266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03839937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016215391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021283005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13003337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152037860","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3650207","title":"A New Paradigm for Epistemology: From Reliabilism to Abilism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029127228766303522,"score_gpt":0.2616167939952068,"score_spread":0.2324895652289033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152037860","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018049434,0.0137436725,0.6026434,0.097732686,0.0029422322,0.0001024386,0.00021244839,0.00033961635,0.264234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8394336,0.005116911,0.12740636,0.0070053567,0.003799649,0.00052694,0.00017731785,0.00055419997,0.015979556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865189,0.009304117,0.000543411,0.0012502006,0.0018145842,0.00056869833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762087,0.016262788,0.0008741722,0.0036779835,0.0020270215,0.0009493716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018384648,0.0013276025,0.0023025572,0.0055913804,0.0060831388,0.0161358,0.0035136947,0.006079412,0.0074765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021933375,0.0009965764,0.0017313518,0.0027709408,0.08101043,0.037423465,0.009869295,0.016065437,0.0016103795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028226893,0.0000025986901,0.000015211861,0.000012570226,0.0000016603931,0.0000050608055,0.0004134857,0.000039995826,0.000011479384,0.99852127,0.00026508042,0.000708603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036611877,0.000002481722,0.000008162723,0.000018336586,0.0000011416491,0.000008478173,0.00013093119,0.0002057991,0.000016443817,0.9967753,0.002826279,0.0000029076675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021138377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015134154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018384648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006195009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005652536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09722847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153240413","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/c5rpn","title":"Knowledge and Assertion in Korean","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Psychology; Cognition; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1166346675663665,"score_gpt":0.2875049584554771,"score_spread":0.17087029088911057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153240413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98809797,0.00015657351,0.000625928,0.00020653282,0.000012889393,0.000020856227,0.00002046251,0.0000045557213,0.010854264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868447,0.000080731195,0.00046208364,0.00008700915,0.000002437843,0.000013299697,0.000021950844,0.0000026760706,0.0006453367],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775994,0.0010301298,0.0002359951,0.00037448746,0.00039312476,0.00020631302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896941,0.0058508,0.0018706077,0.001038536,0.0010849565,0.0004610192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047814106,0.00037667484,0.00032920824,0.0006645122,0.0019751424,0.003194385,0.0005974996,0.00067243486,0.0033929648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106961895,0.00023238419,0.00029765663,0.00081377244,0.0036996575,0.0037466625,0.0034424919,0.0010422381,0.00023734635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009341762,0.0012953657,0.13897184,0.0009090308,0.000088342786,0.0021268767,0.67408967,0.0005692529,0.025755707,0.05833894,0.0010924245,0.095828325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026089654,0.0017085881,0.2264082,0.0006830713,0.00036865,0.0019152096,0.6639192,0.0045036045,0.017972903,0.04734164,0.03461636,0.0003016397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048921793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004535912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048921793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001237503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014203564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025286794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154949570","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3643897","title":"Reasons, Answers, and Goals","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Data science","score_opus":0.02848750294398813,"score_gpt":0.2554422374152888,"score_spread":0.22695473447130068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154949570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038293775,0.0068497327,0.10053278,0.3326665,0.0019722837,0.0002910334,0.00066610455,0.0002599429,0.51846784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8954989,0.0025132792,0.042702567,0.013235939,0.001069837,0.00051782554,0.00049606827,0.00024072258,0.043724872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858224,0.008259917,0.0006861508,0.0016012854,0.0023537248,0.0012765075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98183894,0.008801065,0.0014942704,0.0023836077,0.003762599,0.0017194421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018836768,0.00077499024,0.0010446645,0.0019668974,0.0055550593,0.0125380345,0.0019945018,0.009823402,0.010832807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03693558,0.0007348498,0.00091163383,0.0014229409,0.021487834,0.01849458,0.0050240117,0.0073255487,0.003125052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022327336,0.000018963245,0.00051736814,0.000052580723,0.0000095648265,0.000049275746,0.00245808,0.00011829569,0.00007783647,0.98826385,0.0044560274,0.0039558755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015784586,0.0000058245173,0.00026496084,0.00008367504,0.000007458379,0.000036135552,0.004384612,0.00039838048,0.00011382952,0.9664311,0.028245278,0.000012875266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002869716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003149317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018836768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036546893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076688565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09961951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156898609","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/kjy7r","title":"Belief Through Thick and Thin","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Logical consequence; Psychology; Experimental philosophy; Philosophy; Social psychology; Philosophical methodology","score_opus":0.1283903247322142,"score_gpt":0.2712959703647008,"score_spread":0.14290564563248662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156898609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37209815,0.003303783,0.19380254,0.015533028,0.0004610779,0.0001166258,0.0004811521,0.00017984674,0.41402388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988577,0.00030978542,0.0074926727,0.0004714959,0.00006407701,0.000045202025,0.0000795874,0.00002897568,0.0029311425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660623,0.0013560622,0.00019621165,0.00063851895,0.0008042046,0.00039879562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97976935,0.010441143,0.003810013,0.0025095346,0.0024847,0.0009851439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004600652,0.00048153792,0.00038650198,0.0021196543,0.001977827,0.006137621,0.0009229071,0.0018672417,0.008923035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027475737,0.00036749424,0.0004844303,0.001289849,0.014048515,0.011280818,0.0049011735,0.0035014234,0.00088720745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001621493,0.000025838943,0.003952005,0.0001250482,0.00002256741,0.00010109537,0.007223194,0.00038203166,0.00073989335,0.96771073,0.0010100825,0.018545398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018239354,0.00005588288,0.004465758,0.00019062296,0.000032081844,0.0001766111,0.0036261322,0.0025659027,0.0008500826,0.9794574,0.008531995,0.000029101548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024629952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017371402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008923035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001874967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082209177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029850483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W315888995","doi":"","title":"Receptivity as a virtue of (Practitioners of) argumentation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Receptivity; Argumentation theory; Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.0388025871809708,"score_gpt":0.24143473429023676,"score_spread":0.20263214710926597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W315888995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070987545,0.0048954454,0.30008298,0.09363992,0.0015135149,0.00030670446,0.000057478606,0.0005088349,0.52800757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96166253,0.00072800874,0.024595805,0.0031918278,0.00067374314,0.0003622455,0.000022335993,0.00010068231,0.008662761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9213912,0.063436784,0.0023770332,0.0032998342,0.007550882,0.0019442869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91174227,0.059116077,0.0066779936,0.011702089,0.007151073,0.0036105332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052458864,0.0005488895,0.0006954488,0.0024267582,0.005189782,0.018570576,0.002033101,0.0071509066,0.0037255525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072723605,0.00066154014,0.0007832387,0.0012171245,0.052505057,0.023069272,0.012676893,0.008384496,0.0012646224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011436423,0.000013513751,0.00030549947,0.00003838663,0.000005679442,0.000058755548,0.017346509,0.00007330987,0.0001704447,0.97816783,0.00078862003,0.0030199979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028398144,0.000038165075,0.00018495502,0.00017850113,0.000009053363,0.00022448025,0.0044373525,0.0006068876,0.0003757806,0.9380578,0.05583891,0.000019721798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036325454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002713447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052458864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026923937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036896209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27743232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163624476","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/4eub2","title":"Infinitism, finitude and normativity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.13990370335292582,"score_gpt":0.247732902195912,"score_spread":0.1078291988429862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163624476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07440656,0.0032255712,0.28580326,0.059468642,0.0011988024,0.00007559067,0.00008496343,0.00027689754,0.5754598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537166,0.00079212926,0.02184274,0.003724384,0.00045548842,0.00015867474,0.00003396328,0.00013034216,0.019145666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532086,0.0022865494,0.0002514383,0.0006004326,0.0010587614,0.00048198795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894188,0.006887292,0.00076168764,0.0016462953,0.00086501194,0.0004208754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077170874,0.0005046937,0.0007736311,0.001398045,0.0030601332,0.005898633,0.001962347,0.0026747112,0.007003865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015896184,0.000267083,0.00083910284,0.00094664533,0.031693783,0.011793638,0.005986566,0.0052711032,0.0008894874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006306944,0.0000049176742,0.00008064632,0.0000093371455,0.0000020764996,0.000014432692,0.00051655865,0.000063905245,0.000031539385,0.9976573,0.0004001308,0.0012128362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006206697,0.0000075614166,0.000091755515,0.00003322277,0.000003543586,0.000028644325,0.0004426607,0.00044431505,0.00019627165,0.99169946,0.0070402,0.0000061820983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016001292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019551653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077170874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037422106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019443202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040812373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168698922","doi":"","title":"Belief's Own Ethics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.14634534080982523,"score_gpt":0.3005148551926571,"score_spread":0.15416951438283186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168698922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026687304,0.0015947695,0.096592166,0.047931984,0.00061053823,0.00008652996,0.00013178824,0.00012925673,0.82623565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9357698,0.0005273082,0.011823749,0.0033960068,0.0005209408,0.000126627,0.0000696091,0.00008605927,0.047679827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991527,0.004922578,0.0002801229,0.0009054645,0.0017770606,0.0005878105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98661846,0.007871928,0.0004456288,0.002673927,0.0018274907,0.0005626012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077350955,0.0004312367,0.00057549716,0.0012793099,0.003562458,0.008284285,0.001469424,0.0038581777,0.008648192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018191567,0.00034996853,0.0005496403,0.0006710812,0.021372588,0.006801064,0.0032057485,0.006202368,0.0011159361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029978767,0.0000048180104,0.000040254505,0.0000063028715,0.0000026256644,0.000006465435,0.00066406006,0.000050973307,0.000024187728,0.99733645,0.00074486615,0.0011160016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068396675,0.000004401331,0.000070250455,0.000023199593,0.0000049167925,0.000017432938,0.0003384061,0.00036413356,0.00009282572,0.98321426,0.015859777,0.00000349046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025223407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026160057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008648192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038856429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035555402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04090756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170645942","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i2.6249","title":"Metaphilosophy and Argument: The Case of the Justification of Abduction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentative; Warrant; Epistemology; Dialectic; Philosophy; Argumentation theory; Metaphilosophy; Modern philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.07601258236806627,"score_gpt":0.2633447537202323,"score_spread":0.18733217135216604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170645942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03683363,0.027546521,0.30601352,0.21851175,0.0019556324,0.00016057087,0.00012997928,0.00023749153,0.40861088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93440086,0.004183915,0.0420548,0.008205069,0.0021543994,0.00035432598,0.000057869504,0.00022575834,0.008363043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96567065,0.025501866,0.0011235885,0.0016746337,0.00459269,0.0014366214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94664687,0.044949286,0.0016885647,0.0040817987,0.0021483635,0.00048520957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03429774,0.0008552505,0.0019966224,0.004427081,0.0068802806,0.01264124,0.0032522406,0.014723611,0.0036831936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049238194,0.0010428801,0.0015733569,0.0030293667,0.10010429,0.029474445,0.009243811,0.014159901,0.00067562616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006076762,0.0000025396928,0.000019081386,0.000028899572,0.0000044527624,0.000047477657,0.001064824,0.00009791118,0.000021759855,0.9975077,0.00034147484,0.0008579357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012668975,0.0000035584817,0.000026858435,0.00007871159,0.0000031354175,0.000047273075,0.0003393965,0.00041046017,0.00006740494,0.98905724,0.009946825,0.000006451498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00256095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014878425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03429774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076620816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045112767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18138593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170886814","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/7dp36","title":"Deciding Without Intending","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Replicate; Epistemology; Coin flipping; Computer science; Data science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Statistics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.1980184634170561,"score_gpt":0.2899746338328987,"score_spread":0.09195617041584259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170886814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4588569,0.00090970873,0.119534105,0.018194128,0.0010914323,0.00028448834,0.0004056693,0.0003733521,0.40035015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98686177,0.00018606713,0.008779287,0.0014837602,0.00011531959,0.00006381612,0.000091262285,0.000054537733,0.002364215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9732776,0.015095376,0.0015971342,0.0037438867,0.005354078,0.00093191466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9523469,0.027461965,0.00532681,0.007427275,0.006200136,0.0012368767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015684094,0.0005406927,0.00047551174,0.0010600131,0.0022880198,0.0032249696,0.0009858251,0.0019735827,0.005040189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060677633,0.00031636783,0.0006206956,0.00081796513,0.017315261,0.008234953,0.00332393,0.003927378,0.00073158526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018270362,0.000046031248,0.007115542,0.00023731866,0.000039674193,0.00015505544,0.020404117,0.00035945803,0.0025809484,0.9437852,0.0028789348,0.022215143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007238813,0.00022643924,0.011748735,0.0003195631,0.00014230495,0.000851535,0.015090782,0.0025186732,0.006066275,0.8897477,0.07308289,0.00013276203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013479475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010741517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015684094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013613675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020967317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08294642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171997934","doi":"10.1007/s11098-021-01655-8","title":"Epistemology without guidance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leverhulme Trust; York University","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Normative; Philosophy of mind; Internalism and externalism; Appeal; Externalism; Metaphysics; Mistake; Legitimacy; Meta-epistemology; Philosophy of science; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Social epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.21353781879878858,"score_gpt":0.3541081293911323,"score_spread":0.1405703105923437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171997934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010853071,0.015570793,0.20787108,0.2825885,0.005762243,0.00016903393,0.00032595458,0.0003727959,0.4764865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83497626,0.008740383,0.07134176,0.041543145,0.0053747683,0.00061584223,0.00035706683,0.00055000524,0.036500774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762723,0.015107401,0.0012035088,0.0021511954,0.0045424127,0.0007232042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95963985,0.026073426,0.0018654596,0.0056174863,0.005384107,0.001419589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022378631,0.00089090224,0.0015121828,0.0028065918,0.004500682,0.011924304,0.0024271184,0.007977788,0.007763525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04993929,0.0007537356,0.0009068608,0.0018406984,0.05835821,0.020377332,0.007319608,0.015391392,0.0028398186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033733886,0.000003031951,0.00002428138,0.000030083005,0.000002870487,0.000015336143,0.00047848324,0.000077608,0.000024833575,0.995891,0.0020392155,0.0014099494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004053147,0.0000021450364,0.000011845728,0.00007377488,0.0000017763654,0.000016363092,0.00012740618,0.00015981686,0.00003592337,0.9804552,0.019108174,0.0000035617393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023608396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014311916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022378631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061930898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006119364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11835098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172410781","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3649785","title":"From Virtue Epistemology to Abilism: Theoretical and Empirical Developments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemic virtue; Epistemology; Virtue; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04460026040968473,"score_gpt":0.2988598727081741,"score_spread":0.25425961229848937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172410781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08666715,0.034022223,0.091335796,0.08711319,0.0010349595,0.00006302104,0.0001257913,0.000093718656,0.69954413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698074,0.009346575,0.01128043,0.002565688,0.00081257045,0.00007479381,0.00006604365,0.000060706814,0.0059857736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99359894,0.0044541196,0.00017737459,0.0004314523,0.0010218257,0.00031618596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9353446,0.055800553,0.0018686258,0.0025611578,0.0030596533,0.0013653998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0109877465,0.00048829237,0.0010376006,0.0045807622,0.0038170135,0.012030327,0.0016644639,0.0039867624,0.013495502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024168763,0.00043085395,0.00045139517,0.004874941,0.03847787,0.015198701,0.004807334,0.0076058735,0.0010555006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069347607,0.000025006517,0.0003168099,0.00005529203,0.0000028657987,0.00001228034,0.0009475228,0.00007237884,0.000012580483,0.99393165,0.00048374748,0.0041329986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049343835,0.0000070008373,0.00048282288,0.00016696283,0.0000022327758,0.0000313713,0.0014970714,0.00050743413,0.000032616383,0.9904683,0.006794487,0.0000047778453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015558292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020110675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013495502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037242272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054302467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058109462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174367982","doi":"10.1215/00318108-8809906","title":"Self-Knowledge Requirements and Moore's Paradox","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Irrationality; Nothing; Irrational number; Rationality; Appearance of impropriety; Epistemology; Philosophy; Consistency (knowledge bases); Blame; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Theology","score_opus":0.16036985983275928,"score_gpt":0.34438372195903333,"score_spread":0.18401386212627405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174367982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09837222,0.041773655,0.13586305,0.18688907,0.0012500695,0.000106887186,0.00023629722,0.00025876533,0.5352499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644926,0.009643831,0.014349977,0.0060259714,0.00065834704,0.00011151216,0.00007478024,0.000044535773,0.004598485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920101,0.0037239117,0.000551365,0.0008201275,0.002463806,0.00043077816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982307,0.01163493,0.0015693154,0.002054872,0.0019187301,0.000515227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009291173,0.00031328446,0.0010511461,0.0019945968,0.0021578819,0.0048435614,0.0016232869,0.0045699384,0.0030525168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016365102,0.0004655795,0.00087824155,0.001568748,0.027168633,0.015135873,0.0035137984,0.0059918463,0.0005448015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004715706,0.000004571844,0.000046705,0.000043000815,0.00000426577,0.000044213964,0.00040221855,0.000167404,0.000032591666,0.99661297,0.00045975664,0.0021777502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004342497,0.0000023894772,0.0000695493,0.000040905892,0.0000016475345,0.000041984753,0.00014447304,0.00019061516,0.000045575845,0.99480104,0.004653066,0.000004467125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015834762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001086986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009291173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040849415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033576794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049136996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175100152","doi":"10.1017/can.2021.8","title":"Group Agents and Moral Status: What Can We Owe to Organizations?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Zürich; University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"Gratitude; Collectivism; Individualism; Collective action; Action (physics); Social psychology; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.07136009597545154,"score_gpt":0.25179041115233675,"score_spread":0.1804303151768852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175100152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23904565,0.0061643953,0.024280487,0.16168861,0.0010575213,0.000090036745,0.000078705474,0.00004730868,0.56754726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948278,0.00040315694,0.0009520005,0.001246941,0.000104079416,0.00001895575,0.00001012352,0.000014145656,0.0024227141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830315,0.011665239,0.0003442368,0.0010211171,0.0025698843,0.0013679892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824179,0.007633665,0.0023119582,0.001544709,0.002779433,0.0033123714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015522437,0.0004034244,0.00072015176,0.0025658354,0.009702519,0.014283935,0.0017189246,0.005657684,0.0062332437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022941599,0.00029517233,0.00034773743,0.0016210544,0.067198545,0.012379883,0.005960128,0.004645077,0.0005424641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011032412,0.000025711619,0.00095803925,0.000029513878,0.000007386354,0.000027036745,0.008736417,0.000121538535,0.000038942977,0.985336,0.001233557,0.003474911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016526843,0.000024273526,0.0016878067,0.0001860407,0.000011779368,0.00003060264,0.012366012,0.00038894947,0.00006395863,0.96448296,0.020724054,0.000017008422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006807541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005762593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015522437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0089936275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005518394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08209145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175336634","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/sj29w","title":"Epistemic Modals and Alternative Possibilities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Modal verb; Proposition; Epistemology; Modal; Meaning (existential); Epistemic modality; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12737331929601947,"score_gpt":0.26457112947140915,"score_spread":0.13719781017538968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175336634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31691387,0.0035194654,0.25566944,0.017402584,0.00034813612,0.00022596083,0.00043686255,0.00029326236,0.40519047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810704,0.0003788592,0.016312877,0.0004923165,0.00008829399,0.000092822986,0.000061157596,0.00002861933,0.0014746181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776768,0.013869447,0.00097346894,0.0022180649,0.0044296193,0.00083253224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9436621,0.043583393,0.003996185,0.0041604703,0.0035036176,0.0010942031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012919748,0.0007771353,0.00056585274,0.0032024027,0.0025217023,0.006500462,0.0013614595,0.0029245175,0.008612343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057612434,0.0006594867,0.0011494517,0.0019068797,0.02096852,0.02072515,0.006044141,0.0038751848,0.00046964327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008273047,0.000035886525,0.0008576018,0.00012424754,0.00003316291,0.000084473766,0.00442038,0.00074435415,0.0006812703,0.9824076,0.0004505843,0.010077717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017462155,0.00002169829,0.0010284142,0.00007376422,0.000017803271,0.000076457196,0.00095282326,0.0015825591,0.0003814125,0.9925552,0.0032676784,0.000024739113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009288494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074578554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012919748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002570313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010329147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06832701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175495792","doi":"10.1007/s11229-021-03267-5","title":"Salience and metaphysical explanation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Sketch; Analogy; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Explication; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06249898446690601,"score_gpt":0.2594852331257799,"score_spread":0.19698624865887393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175495792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06796577,0.014746954,0.22814322,0.11516938,0.0017237909,0.00017034417,0.00066181953,0.00025519895,0.5711636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971281,0.0016649984,0.018340208,0.0011951459,0.00073166017,0.00010591254,0.00019661339,0.00009770352,0.0063867164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99405164,0.004368243,0.00018495324,0.0004990067,0.00063922734,0.00025689727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771952,0.017878933,0.00094194186,0.0024349815,0.0012230872,0.00032587274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008135029,0.00070671126,0.0007931953,0.004748423,0.0030992208,0.008009868,0.0023721894,0.0030176865,0.0153204035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030977326,0.0005597974,0.0005582224,0.0030529988,0.023375511,0.015080984,0.003475974,0.0036501067,0.0010096888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068882227,0.000005344602,0.00005879884,0.000032590935,0.0000041251233,0.000013630776,0.0009107503,0.00012543787,0.000022973358,0.99676657,0.00048626674,0.0015665768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000644058,0.0000015856205,0.000078783014,0.000047047168,0.0000033978304,0.000012857001,0.00082047924,0.000427817,0.00006786037,0.99281186,0.0057193916,0.0000025036065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018011488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018316575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0153204035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051558036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033704482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05125183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175573316","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12810","title":"Epistemic Akrasia and Belief‐Credence Dualism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Dualism; Epistemology; Proposition; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.43140037651408075,"score_gpt":0.39346633643776496,"score_spread":0.03793404007631579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175573316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20091493,0.0020329037,0.2386139,0.029818634,0.00061249285,0.00010743471,0.00016164956,0.00023712817,0.5275009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99083674,0.00013328968,0.00649506,0.00046622,0.000096341464,0.000035146317,0.00002076316,0.000013549659,0.0019028897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99032545,0.004990058,0.00063048035,0.0011206823,0.0017851671,0.0011481917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802609,0.012266161,0.0020359016,0.003154364,0.0015307587,0.00075190235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00785622,0.00039501913,0.000796755,0.002207353,0.0038054124,0.007840588,0.0013299393,0.003981521,0.0058496697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01862733,0.0005145435,0.0012284742,0.001353296,0.0318922,0.013443614,0.006944555,0.0056939893,0.0005924033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008440709,0.0000063379534,0.00010976623,0.000012340673,0.0000037577354,0.000046165096,0.0006076383,0.0001059237,0.000046514488,0.9983358,0.00013825044,0.0005791008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010255581,0.000003815507,0.00008982284,0.000020766454,0.0000042496713,0.000086388296,0.0003231102,0.0009481499,0.00011399362,0.9959757,0.0024168137,0.0000069115144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001123138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006611027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00785622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003384515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011983607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041548133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175593634","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/3tsm9","title":"Knowledge From Falsehood: An Experimental Study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Premise; Verdict; Epistemology; Simple (philosophy); Extension (predicate logic); Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.21326256379948094,"score_gpt":0.3378427071475165,"score_spread":0.12458014334803558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175593634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9524546,0.00078222796,0.010173233,0.0029483386,0.0003280659,0.001767611,0.0005095438,0.00015723667,0.030879138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97862476,0.00042577024,0.013711806,0.0020483537,0.0002517575,0.00187509,0.00036304406,0.00007902109,0.002620393],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840268,0.00939958,0.0013152715,0.0025900232,0.0020954234,0.0005729727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6643079,0.29907307,0.0099564195,0.020938976,0.0040806546,0.0016428633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01624508,0.0010865321,0.0011092452,0.00082640006,0.0025766923,0.0034799862,0.0027444959,0.004301346,0.017112453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13925654,0.0012464717,0.00087995915,0.0007116158,0.006361876,0.007935411,0.00360211,0.005996656,0.0013437861],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03872604,0.11745002,0.07266255,0.009876183,0.0015372467,0.0071898275,0.21780188,0.0052087004,0.11648127,0.17709823,0.02137845,0.21458969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.025995618,0.071484424,0.13226669,0.002339679,0.0021146121,0.013647118,0.05091224,0.052599426,0.072558366,0.46129033,0.113398984,0.0013925303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010267245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059483136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017112453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001097893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008912172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08591324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176353597","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0109","title":"Fooling the Victim: Of Straw Men and Those Who Fall for Them","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Adversarial system; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Law and economics; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.12006824338450683,"score_gpt":0.2821851329781331,"score_spread":0.16211688959362625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176353597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21406871,0.011809442,0.054644015,0.22773829,0.004526949,0.00013982007,0.000047638165,0.00017814832,0.48684704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96406186,0.001016732,0.0017665239,0.0103528835,0.00055187003,0.000036473266,0.000010998989,0.00012568939,0.022076853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812858,0.013834474,0.00029452457,0.0012334136,0.0018948185,0.0014569662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826806,0.012076472,0.001517929,0.0011748074,0.0015031367,0.0010470714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01845396,0.00074880855,0.0011522745,0.002032622,0.019124426,0.012674904,0.002088801,0.011179312,0.008728382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036296967,0.000615322,0.0004998901,0.0011739016,0.065731384,0.019617405,0.00960687,0.012474916,0.0017758893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033232398,0.00002198485,0.00072896015,0.000058586807,0.000016897216,0.00070262305,0.16495244,0.000056797653,0.00020185468,0.8174162,0.008949734,0.006860612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019283605,0.00005549943,0.0006836642,0.0008911281,0.00003231941,0.0011147974,0.2150646,0.0005943064,0.000981179,0.4853913,0.29511636,0.000055554818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020600292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023568426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019124426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004326171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002950125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097595036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180377919","doi":"","title":"Review of Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemic virtue; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027739477147372404,"score_gpt":0.28397444430716057,"score_spread":0.25623496715978816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180377919","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031231192,0.8864347,0.009704529,0.05741755,0.003049692,0.000018524977,0.00011129784,0.000032313063,0.040108304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26783395,0.6999707,0.0043155947,0.010998539,0.009760148,0.00010444919,0.00023649594,0.00007185571,0.0067082183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99402547,0.0033236446,0.0003809391,0.00062918826,0.0013982082,0.0002424955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822036,0.0123944115,0.0010289389,0.0009525095,0.0030682385,0.00035220126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076748575,0.00047331036,0.0011998358,0.004635765,0.001165651,0.0050645326,0.0015291469,0.0027120705,0.003383965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022225797,0.00034932734,0.0004613914,0.004683549,0.0070614745,0.008301387,0.0019101495,0.0028832436,0.00073281757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005203335,0.00001197292,0.0002572061,0.00350377,0.000079426245,0.000042515145,0.0006629318,0.0007437226,0.00015436966,0.8382983,0.041932,0.11426175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002325091,0.00004051258,0.0014142485,0.005107258,0.000095243035,0.0001612653,0.0006193488,0.0005882475,0.0003250849,0.46986708,0.52172166,0.00003684651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028273868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034833297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076748575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004247139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005984989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040589035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180651173","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3649537","title":"An Open and Shut Case: Epistemic Closure in the Manifest Image","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0654817544281566,"score_gpt":0.31614082049281544,"score_spread":0.2506590660646588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180651173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15890926,0.001028853,0.1462435,0.093570836,0.0009282918,0.00019558909,0.00022301069,0.00021494109,0.5986857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98485374,0.00011253442,0.0063180933,0.0009711493,0.00012911366,0.000108119006,0.000025340018,0.000085721396,0.007396228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892925,0.0061646486,0.00037158196,0.00131082,0.0016631032,0.0011973669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97348195,0.018683504,0.0009918468,0.004359372,0.0011577826,0.001325477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015514189,0.00048613444,0.0010738611,0.0014188334,0.011600194,0.016762422,0.0023115627,0.011256145,0.015157526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04856796,0.0007563907,0.0010564211,0.0013023075,0.054807656,0.037173856,0.0109570185,0.014635324,0.00090849446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001722845,0.00000760016,0.000063906235,0.0000059874687,0.0000012922224,0.00012125122,0.0033875091,0.000055989774,0.000046707293,0.995168,0.0004809601,0.00064369146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023140283,0.00000698999,0.000057836674,0.000022786653,0.000004484387,0.000082507926,0.0030838344,0.0006304466,0.00012480159,0.99091244,0.005039724,0.000011160038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026166455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017208338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016762422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003944361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004544925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08204788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181281194","doi":"10.1007/s11229-021-03293-3","title":"Standing to epistemically blame","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Epistemology; Harm; Philosophy of science; Metaphysics; Wrongdoing; Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07674753896987704,"score_gpt":0.2796177497125697,"score_spread":0.20287021074269265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181281194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019798456,0.012683043,0.077686116,0.32878357,0.0085130045,0.00007347618,0.00041983675,0.00030827988,0.5517343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8984915,0.0048884433,0.022312865,0.025105583,0.002684264,0.00015187114,0.000281501,0.00045380206,0.04563019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99100024,0.0063674576,0.00031935918,0.00085638533,0.0010525489,0.00040397048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97180396,0.019010054,0.0014515844,0.0035995152,0.0035621475,0.00057283655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010674339,0.00089903944,0.0006433452,0.002364525,0.005572094,0.010985937,0.0017885555,0.006383244,0.019686129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0382209,0.0004973519,0.00040157864,0.0014699348,0.023719387,0.018971384,0.0043856977,0.008123126,0.0035142659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015141092,0.000009109246,0.00007516727,0.00007122574,0.000009115582,0.000038052178,0.005122757,0.000069268135,0.000071008915,0.9825555,0.007998524,0.003965043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010617588,0.00000610032,0.00010637722,0.00048128565,0.000012377235,0.00006823996,0.0071650934,0.00020656307,0.00039133118,0.88878125,0.10275855,0.000012188202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019304234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003273709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019686129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041983686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054243705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065856695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181382971","doi":"10.1007/s11098-021-01703-3","title":"How to modify the strength of a reason","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Conditional probability; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Mathematical economics; Measure (data warehouse); Mathematics; Epistemology; Star (game theory); Computer science; Philosophy; Discrete mathematics; Statistics; Data mining","score_opus":0.20201982524177362,"score_gpt":0.32580405825088776,"score_spread":0.12378423300911415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181382971","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032055672,0.0039645345,0.4518908,0.15294467,0.0072338516,0.00029800477,0.00018414638,0.0008076265,0.35062075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73565096,0.0014974445,0.22374979,0.012311271,0.0014484056,0.0003687843,0.00007854785,0.00079065555,0.02410426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908991,0.004104405,0.00054413127,0.002006182,0.0018186952,0.00062762166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95378613,0.023537826,0.0018829851,0.013659553,0.0057106805,0.0014227757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017636184,0.00086959737,0.0010317325,0.001965565,0.0033679425,0.00792895,0.0027007202,0.005613735,0.020596923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06534193,0.0009116281,0.0014948417,0.00076314353,0.02512653,0.02487445,0.005365283,0.009014539,0.0035762067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034253695,0.000022213144,0.00022952573,0.00008076228,0.00004389709,0.00004538271,0.0005988051,0.00048075523,0.0004534782,0.9844338,0.0021310467,0.0114459405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031492174,0.000013368482,0.00012377338,0.00008022741,0.000025462505,0.000051796887,0.0003571847,0.0007314898,0.0004562725,0.97604704,0.022059713,0.000022133368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022881406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024855128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020596923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002892253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004853747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09327012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184969065","doi":"10.1017/epi.2021.23","title":"On the Epistemic Costs of Friendship: Against the Encroachment View","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Doxastic logic; Defeasible estate; Irrationality; Closure (psychology); Epistemology; Realm; Obligation; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Rationality; Law","score_opus":0.06567017976221233,"score_gpt":0.26778977031700746,"score_spread":0.20211959055479511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184969065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61961085,0.0009208805,0.0809389,0.04635608,0.00020432427,0.00007782554,0.00009566537,0.00020503382,0.25159046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99711394,0.000051847026,0.0014403464,0.00039383132,0.000049529426,0.000022811224,0.000007747158,0.000020996933,0.00089880277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900497,0.005145691,0.00032603642,0.0012440342,0.002564211,0.00067046826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.941802,0.034046724,0.00595318,0.012592039,0.003596625,0.0020094195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009269546,0.0004470205,0.000876689,0.0013345438,0.0032889566,0.004853775,0.0018776656,0.004825394,0.0064047347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04121031,0.0005222054,0.0004902511,0.0006234822,0.03928365,0.01368548,0.008702606,0.0061249025,0.0005158598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007414182,0.00004122649,0.0018781958,0.00004693007,0.000018088425,0.00018900575,0.0030128998,0.0007617666,0.0003984921,0.9874907,0.00071552885,0.0053730006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035551482,0.0000411972,0.002285464,0.000049666734,0.00001918005,0.00028718638,0.0015813699,0.0029494686,0.000560978,0.98671395,0.0054489383,0.00002697209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088108506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085320213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009269546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002301772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082805194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049022675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185666711","doi":"10.1111/phib.12242","title":"Lacking, needing, and wanting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytic Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Epistemology; Psychology; Internet privacy; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.08896742578172938,"score_gpt":0.26927003054492094,"score_spread":0.18030260476319154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185666711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19057457,0.005148985,0.048729658,0.047863655,0.0006895845,0.00007174871,0.00016734513,0.00008820447,0.7066662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99161035,0.00047449424,0.001967463,0.001006411,0.00007663862,0.000026775479,0.00002690179,0.000018793591,0.004792361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960459,0.0025140499,0.00013697993,0.00030265265,0.00063680176,0.0003635699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945491,0.0027839572,0.0006938993,0.0005541306,0.00062901917,0.00078978966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00413916,0.00029453394,0.0003992304,0.0013925883,0.0031938322,0.0062497025,0.00074525236,0.0017261723,0.005164457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058259913,0.0002183936,0.00041900054,0.0009429726,0.03200127,0.0083043,0.0042757187,0.0036106864,0.0003116166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012538827,0.000015852103,0.00043918358,0.000032062097,0.000004358543,0.00007102381,0.0064016692,0.00006388861,0.00011858606,0.990123,0.0009162835,0.0018015396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013313397,0.000022933089,0.0008139955,0.00015483682,0.0000112956695,0.0003066222,0.012077114,0.0005056855,0.00020354643,0.9478184,0.038050156,0.000022026326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010284891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009123702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062497025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024056837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013413746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021890223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186997889","doi":"10.1007/s13194-021-00398-x","title":"Symmetry and partial belief geometry","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Credence; Metric (unit); Epistemology; Pairwise comparison; Space (punctuation); Commutative property; Philosophy of science; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Theoretical physics; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Pure mathematics; Physics; Geometry; Machine learning","score_opus":0.08882463160913935,"score_gpt":0.28686787312208845,"score_spread":0.1980432415129491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186997889","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20595147,0.0025214665,0.614724,0.015586806,0.0003459413,0.00015626963,0.00092609605,0.00026788955,0.15952015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96114033,0.000401842,0.03145146,0.00039416063,0.00016606045,0.00012650274,0.00030779518,0.00005512867,0.0059567303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99526477,0.0026016615,0.00030253097,0.00079715345,0.00070765935,0.00032614925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98803407,0.0076314043,0.000743167,0.0015953504,0.0014366558,0.0005594017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004480876,0.0005485433,0.0015709692,0.0014587014,0.0027690558,0.004535251,0.0012397156,0.0015689858,0.0077244453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016199838,0.0005242195,0.0020207334,0.0011795773,0.010234956,0.008563588,0.0036530474,0.003241394,0.0007110748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009988503,0.00000358299,0.00007281015,0.000010371829,0.000009782453,0.000010951117,0.00012699308,0.000391158,0.000031444506,0.99823016,0.00013545857,0.00096733635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052076302,0.0000037757438,0.00004339541,0.0000025286802,0.0000024330468,0.000009880169,0.000029942817,0.0009548566,0.000023568218,0.9986016,0.0003197945,0.000002916823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025018228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012779363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077244453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023483324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017781961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025840819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187438196","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/wbjrv","title":"A Peculiar and Perpetual Tendency: An Asymmetry in Knowledge Attributions for Affirmations and Negations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negation; Attribution; Psychology; Experimental philosophy; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Philosophical methodology","score_opus":0.1665951980839617,"score_gpt":0.31981004941574775,"score_spread":0.15321485133178606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187438196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.982314,0.00023209218,0.0078147445,0.0009078396,0.000025118194,0.000018872262,0.000038259273,0.00004770402,0.008601256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984295,0.00005308548,0.0011590153,0.000120619654,0.000015698983,0.000008422508,0.000023177663,0.000011877844,0.00017851096],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99325764,0.0031152314,0.00051793567,0.0010943315,0.0017454411,0.00026942897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9441011,0.03637876,0.008063303,0.007515814,0.0031736263,0.0007673825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010657602,0.00020463993,0.00042827355,0.0017645007,0.000940338,0.0024465187,0.00058131653,0.0011284595,0.0024593684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06569384,0.00040759682,0.00038645777,0.0007176676,0.0054291855,0.0056961956,0.0031985373,0.0015114889,0.00024684047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024090372,0.00032051766,0.33463338,0.000679456,0.0003783963,0.0017251538,0.24160193,0.0009812055,0.07594589,0.15258731,0.0021949036,0.18654285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021201065,0.00046311005,0.5244561,0.00046592415,0.00036176885,0.0047002365,0.06997977,0.008841603,0.018492484,0.3574328,0.014203717,0.00039046397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007809235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005954797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010657602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004928739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042857867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056363523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193570546","doi":"10.3390/rel12090673","title":"Religious Disagreement, Mystical Experience, and Doxastic Minimalism: Critical Notice of John Pittard’s Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religions","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Mysticism; Deference; Epistemology; Philosophy; Notice; Universality (dynamical systems); Philosophy of religion; Coherentism; Skepticism; Psychology; Social psychology; Theology; Law; Foundationalism; Political science","score_opus":0.053503461076809415,"score_gpt":0.30545863299007375,"score_spread":0.25195517191326433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193570546","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09620267,0.03432515,0.02091961,0.63616633,0.0028436494,0.000053725074,0.000043219774,0.0000352462,0.2094103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742484,0.0031871672,0.0016739042,0.014970641,0.0011486579,0.000048771,0.000009965317,0.000029708188,0.0046827444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928845,0.0049766516,0.00013261208,0.000488939,0.0010554859,0.0004618387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835802,0.013949559,0.00063455815,0.00051824056,0.000776324,0.0005411467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009206499,0.00036208247,0.00050994696,0.0013252256,0.009228054,0.008665714,0.0020706584,0.005715378,0.0018386671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014385296,0.00030145785,0.00031871037,0.001389438,0.07192035,0.014485026,0.006997669,0.012943419,0.00016479369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010584615,0.0000107499245,0.000099184035,0.000022075847,0.0000018800866,0.00009207047,0.028656997,0.00006462935,0.000036674443,0.96550715,0.0037481978,0.0017499444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016604912,0.000017186469,0.00035449682,0.00016431058,0.0000034938314,0.00012491723,0.02598999,0.0005395964,0.00016162795,0.9227694,0.049839772,0.000018539246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054166093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061698514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009228054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006523346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036681653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048689246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195026659","doi":"10.5070/bs325254492","title":"Bringing Philosophy into Scientific Research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkeley Scientific Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23392003248449034,"score_gpt":0.36621609072251143,"score_spread":0.1322960582380211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195026659","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025599375,0.21192624,0.031773545,0.521771,0.02638905,0.000029079058,0.00015016693,0.00031690902,0.20508398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50794435,0.18169437,0.045645,0.09731934,0.058203094,0.00038589237,0.00023992959,0.0009828269,0.10758535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98906416,0.0075042187,0.00038146597,0.00076421653,0.0019473486,0.00033869594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96824956,0.024170015,0.0009825347,0.0027854473,0.00217764,0.0016349746],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0209776,0.0006300384,0.001349253,0.0041916,0.0064243795,0.015971722,0.0010406238,0.005341396,0.008145959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025754508,0.00096189487,0.0005391198,0.0028819854,0.043720417,0.014449319,0.005570823,0.016636807,0.0015786603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065656864,0.000011957625,0.00011533897,0.00010496566,0.000011411395,0.000015731139,0.0010569579,0.0000841265,0.000039915656,0.9492812,0.04099113,0.008280744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009314057,0.0000048424117,0.00014336438,0.00022783018,0.0000066658004,0.000019939596,0.0005602987,0.00014324766,0.000044308475,0.8169055,0.18192847,0.0000062259082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035262622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050240974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99357563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060413997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012508733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11094147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195700337","doi":"","title":"Manifest Failure: The Gettier Problem Solved","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.044431776175462415,"score_gpt":0.22430869635088513,"score_spread":0.17987692017542273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195700337","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030185675,0.0026940994,0.5449903,0.09730961,0.0031289412,0.00032028256,0.00041179644,0.0020491036,0.31891018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8148407,0.0017297717,0.09826904,0.021764297,0.0020938236,0.00057980255,0.00044047253,0.0017087462,0.05857341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869976,0.0042660744,0.0009240967,0.0027363023,0.0035648802,0.0015111505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98041785,0.009126383,0.0011075255,0.0056260396,0.0029507296,0.0007714532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014086344,0.0015884595,0.0016615489,0.0022103009,0.0049458803,0.005717142,0.004043948,0.009318685,0.031556718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04900392,0.0011638863,0.002628886,0.0015648856,0.024628019,0.02856421,0.013837961,0.014416693,0.0041449973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002017532,0.000008745495,0.0002355051,0.00004343906,0.000008530848,0.00018890297,0.0006589219,0.00023330696,0.00010041913,0.9863007,0.005748329,0.0064529446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025287145,0.000014190784,0.00008372614,0.00005711451,0.00001158598,0.00027568292,0.00030687527,0.0016183147,0.0001999963,0.9758297,0.021558534,0.000019033641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034898408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002228622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031556718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042842743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004225506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10556775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196644496","doi":"10.1017/apa.2020.47","title":"Using and Abusing Moorean Arguments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Dialogical self; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07847848016735143,"score_gpt":0.3007912275173255,"score_spread":0.22231274734997408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196644496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08372509,0.004885318,0.20750394,0.2043456,0.0030889222,0.000115681905,0.00014984835,0.0004350727,0.4957505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94844615,0.0008614925,0.023664806,0.00896654,0.0009595367,0.00011873169,0.000038810125,0.00011449589,0.016829276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815901,0.011711218,0.00074467476,0.0014978996,0.0038121857,0.00064388325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9572434,0.03069484,0.0022296843,0.0044928906,0.0044472455,0.00089194375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018372364,0.00063291367,0.00077070843,0.0028129178,0.0048473,0.007856323,0.0022471426,0.0064184284,0.00833272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043426473,0.00037858772,0.0007476335,0.0011074872,0.02535907,0.015943635,0.007695218,0.0066386154,0.0012127109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000110019655,0.000008445079,0.00009376944,0.000021760743,0.0000045178426,0.000057442034,0.0013082989,0.000099275174,0.0000747065,0.9945581,0.0012437981,0.0025189074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009400945,0.000013780106,0.00010898597,0.00012701168,0.000010935135,0.00006469613,0.0011193611,0.0018156319,0.0005398486,0.9664855,0.029687768,0.000017009168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001346858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015380628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018372364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004696961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023732393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09716356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198216133","doi":"","title":"Knowledge and Truth: A Skeptical Challenge","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03229981596449075,"score_gpt":0.2652815560203146,"score_spread":0.23298174005582387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198216133","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022014752,0.005541967,0.05602382,0.811691,0.0021645864,0.000048798312,0.0000938561,0.00013105743,0.10229019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9111399,0.0026162562,0.014611431,0.06064046,0.005109196,0.00013607336,0.00007616016,0.00014407617,0.0055263997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93084204,0.042084478,0.0032197242,0.00605292,0.016150227,0.0016506603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74359393,0.19605067,0.009546582,0.02388613,0.022985242,0.0039374903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06620024,0.00073106465,0.002082827,0.0037546894,0.007476709,0.015782686,0.0040951306,0.019574188,0.0062458925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15236545,0.0008686822,0.0015408664,0.0025054682,0.080030166,0.042036507,0.011608036,0.02778897,0.002045505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004046599,0.000025738558,0.00028964964,0.00007873978,0.000016871052,0.00013342543,0.0038955403,0.00021132232,0.00010510794,0.9828199,0.0060794028,0.0063038073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021089105,0.000012169071,0.0001065623,0.00011757881,0.000007315992,0.00013550234,0.0011118633,0.00049658545,0.00012250013,0.9851532,0.01269841,0.000017226499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016587845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008968757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06620024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006493355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055972375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3501045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199257122","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i3.6844","title":"Inference Claims as Assertions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.10907747504918679,"score_gpt":0.3166324414169478,"score_spread":0.207554966367761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199257122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058087785,0.0030304682,0.37266487,0.031068651,0.0015625868,0.00028149626,0.000661048,0.00069097505,0.5319521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91713166,0.001101278,0.05315156,0.0024253847,0.001142221,0.0004368635,0.0004670281,0.0003182532,0.0238258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98157823,0.010426309,0.0014220398,0.0023078439,0.0031743057,0.001091228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97291946,0.018105196,0.0017659252,0.0038064024,0.0027641335,0.0006388394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018129082,0.00084732275,0.0007263681,0.0022792383,0.0042651105,0.010665198,0.00240878,0.004883642,0.012612704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03480004,0.00090684084,0.0013320588,0.0017163181,0.022054017,0.028445031,0.008072031,0.0058576553,0.0021739698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014354257,0.0000059628665,0.00006988415,0.000035185425,0.000004871277,0.000060735678,0.0029432203,0.00007984978,0.00015120592,0.9942806,0.0006083797,0.0017458004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001896279,0.000015010704,0.00012911345,0.00012530286,0.000025842128,0.00009812079,0.0015314993,0.0010764936,0.000756819,0.96360177,0.032606844,0.000014272508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013103393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009857194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018129082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003514675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020194377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09587687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199877200","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12840","title":"Banks, Bosses, and Bears: A Pragmatist Argument Against Encroachment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pragmatism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Doxastic logic; Philosophy; Affect (linguistics); Admiration; Order (exchange); Psychology; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.26984150371992155,"score_gpt":0.36596592583023063,"score_spread":0.09612442211030908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199877200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.143346,0.0021168594,0.051081683,0.18362395,0.0008828083,0.00008166343,0.000048146612,0.00013864564,0.6186802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98227453,0.0002452801,0.0026338142,0.0045311484,0.00016718452,0.000049703438,0.0000067321735,0.00003765394,0.010053871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98479885,0.010043164,0.000414524,0.0014781161,0.0024020374,0.00086333725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745343,0.01723901,0.0020125653,0.0033651963,0.002116846,0.00073214027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015786435,0.00043180518,0.00065755437,0.0012810914,0.007135934,0.0070222053,0.0015800497,0.0075426884,0.008428258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03078935,0.0006029492,0.00043631857,0.0012302874,0.07825945,0.013480383,0.009049353,0.009502834,0.0008708967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000791842,0.0000046780433,0.0000660516,0.000009000531,0.0000019086997,0.000046359208,0.0032529088,0.0000722819,0.00003724161,0.99510646,0.00087176636,0.0005234855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002631682,0.000012090294,0.00016864906,0.00007653181,0.000006004923,0.00007522604,0.0028099362,0.00057450397,0.00024260185,0.97321904,0.022775512,0.000013619981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035455732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029649087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015786435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004764461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035240012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08348769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200687122","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/bgn8m","title":"On the General Argument Against Internalism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.10702999027385383,"score_gpt":0.26878183952198353,"score_spread":0.1617518492481297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200687122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024407657,0.0049567637,0.044447996,0.43719175,0.002426336,0.000068301284,0.00021248849,0.000261479,0.48602733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84122396,0.0030832435,0.009812821,0.11024437,0.0053136135,0.00027758253,0.00016984454,0.0005107872,0.02936378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98818016,0.005502109,0.00029411793,0.0021863298,0.0026252687,0.001211905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97851,0.012805003,0.0017200493,0.0030323504,0.0029307296,0.001001779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014529127,0.0008964766,0.0014066242,0.0027321982,0.005150057,0.011012148,0.002746875,0.0090027265,0.012088603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031141642,0.0005662194,0.0014973647,0.0023694276,0.056019623,0.017000923,0.010461042,0.016041366,0.0027992374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009158768,0.000008151455,0.00014099875,0.000029647566,0.000006020563,0.000023570492,0.00051941903,0.00009329159,0.000023492688,0.9918819,0.00608909,0.0011753145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002185681,0.000006981407,0.00018246357,0.000119014934,0.000009202302,0.000052922624,0.00051759847,0.0002973163,0.00012065327,0.97165537,0.027006773,0.00000981953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028089376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015124162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014529127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062309937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032093665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076838255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200981892","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3649820","title":"Knowledge, Certainty, and Assertion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Certainty; Epistemology; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03216753604662609,"score_gpt":0.2682203493431813,"score_spread":0.2360528132965552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200981892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11549403,0.023640461,0.14398253,0.11337058,0.001441057,0.00013210182,0.00042681134,0.00012770273,0.6013847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98439586,0.0017163557,0.007840058,0.0014985962,0.0005076006,0.00008031002,0.000077810335,0.000025653428,0.0038577088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866649,0.008057413,0.0008671321,0.0015647807,0.0021528215,0.00069298985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689051,0.022279166,0.0024132929,0.0033796132,0.0022448716,0.000777872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0146852685,0.00048619628,0.0011178529,0.0032530369,0.004331823,0.012093393,0.0019211126,0.005203747,0.006716904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04108081,0.0006224704,0.00076576206,0.0021420105,0.05222701,0.01886514,0.005261788,0.004951664,0.0006988891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020992766,0.000010358897,0.00029987082,0.000045395303,0.000010270032,0.000029189992,0.0021461544,0.0001785563,0.00003492209,0.9933827,0.0005622791,0.0032795477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008859974,0.000003925337,0.00010332328,0.000047322083,0.0000056305767,0.000018879678,0.0005535154,0.0001881297,0.00003733235,0.99657345,0.0024527628,0.000006864882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044287583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022634766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0146852685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003183414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004129724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07766408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202302542","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12776","title":"Teaching &amp; Learning Guide for: Epistemic blame","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"Research Manitoba","keywords":"Blame; Citation; Philosophy; Library science; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11815804855242666,"score_gpt":0.31729652522828883,"score_spread":0.19913847667586215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202302542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021276902,0.0014887255,0.22621214,0.018251222,0.0017636658,0.0008733997,0.010506596,0.049724244,0.68905234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009747717,0.0014188479,0.18865108,0.0048613134,0.00032129954,0.0008572891,0.004152635,0.012802877,0.777187],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945265,0.00015933263,0.000041900137,0.00005770106,0.00022710701,0.00006133326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551266,0.002504646,0.00014960096,0.00031694275,0.0011094746,0.00040655796],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013875721,0.0010850328,0.00047942152,0.0012640402,0.0012707636,0.0032345932,0.0016931301,0.0026578244,0.36292347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008259766,0.0008286029,0.0005555583,0.0007089616,0.000993036,0.0052431547,0.002335937,0.0034235676,0.23904322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022770173,0.000054487482,0.00012796263,0.00014258284,0.000001564148,0.000082909115,0.0006329909,0.00016580739,0.00039641242,0.009905535,0.81975883,0.1687081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017033737,0.000011261416,0.00015547061,0.000181582,0.0000019337801,0.00015198215,0.00034459113,0.00043335222,0.00060558395,0.013063305,0.9850212,0.000012639919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036163602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012617391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36292347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009473117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042699166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9087123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202309894","doi":"10.1007/s11787-021-00289-y","title":"The Role of the Common in Cognitive Prosperity: Our Command of the Unspeakable and Unwriteable","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Relevance (law); Principal (computer security); Criminal justice; Criminal law; Inference; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0354634357098894,"score_gpt":0.24073988237091842,"score_spread":0.205276446661029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202309894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16285533,0.0072715348,0.24313262,0.15262294,0.0009653553,0.00009333474,0.0002867971,0.0003001935,0.4324719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819462,0.00052907364,0.011186414,0.0016638541,0.0002532932,0.000064721935,0.000040020317,0.00012271188,0.0041936333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930219,0.003652792,0.00027830654,0.0015578609,0.00083346735,0.00065561815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980354,0.010410351,0.0013252321,0.004519698,0.0019079319,0.0014826446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010907913,0.00071996445,0.0012622542,0.0027417878,0.008060139,0.010543214,0.0034941337,0.0052994136,0.0070995335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019208487,0.0007570797,0.0010007885,0.001813274,0.11707219,0.03637431,0.009241492,0.0077939252,0.0007186161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014973307,0.0000073504066,0.00015894914,0.000028894963,0.000008919092,0.00002689513,0.0057543963,0.0001767398,0.00007725337,0.99128926,0.0005419191,0.001914509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005288997,0.0000029611201,0.00006218363,0.000017303839,0.000004163291,0.000017046572,0.0008930781,0.00021905635,0.000066124594,0.99578357,0.0029234965,0.0000056534045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007975094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006336375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010907913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044303862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004947113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057687283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202812941","doi":"10.3998/ergo.2277","title":"Knowledge, Practical Knowledge, and Intentional Action","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.40026785894055994,"score_gpt":0.4920426712474265,"score_spread":0.09177481230686657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202812941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040790096,0.0032811793,0.12966725,0.0869165,0.0005341906,0.00009510556,0.0001032893,0.00012777936,0.73848456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599874,0.0010196042,0.01654047,0.005670857,0.00028179155,0.00012827342,0.00006488986,0.000057766876,0.016248858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99164456,0.004132492,0.0004131308,0.0012950265,0.0014760515,0.0010387524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98794425,0.007712894,0.0010856638,0.0016168847,0.0010554303,0.00058489805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009748861,0.00066947547,0.00074138294,0.0019507136,0.004776609,0.0075922906,0.0022062673,0.00729955,0.007877255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010435543,0.0005400332,0.0011789926,0.0014551544,0.0684462,0.016851233,0.007972574,0.007002923,0.0012899013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029969806,0.0000029855441,0.000039156927,0.000011421929,0.000001212001,0.000022433518,0.0006222831,0.000056170436,0.000010379918,0.9982753,0.00027898277,0.00067671237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008453198,0.000007274197,0.000099836616,0.000044707984,0.0000040830005,0.000050836763,0.00077328226,0.0003537238,0.000105524545,0.98765206,0.010892691,0.0000075617104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063619334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038559113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009748861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005367365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003662245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05155754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203187718","doi":"10.1093/analys/anab025","title":"Settling the Unsettled: Roles for Belief","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Credence; Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Ecological rationality; Belief system; Bayesian probability; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.057532957944919146,"score_gpt":0.2836102128633554,"score_spread":0.22607725491843628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203187718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12709448,0.007060428,0.29891568,0.111094944,0.0009087553,0.00007363178,0.00016594808,0.00024365177,0.45444247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861655,0.00042694443,0.007886332,0.0013435691,0.0001781678,0.000028348846,0.000015284335,0.00005503975,0.0039007072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98638815,0.009876403,0.00033604214,0.0010402334,0.0016710653,0.0006881637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96600467,0.025860153,0.0016953155,0.0027463601,0.002619913,0.0010734816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013093501,0.00045469785,0.0007955635,0.0018061985,0.0040318193,0.010757055,0.0019762989,0.0038899046,0.0073890747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037963677,0.00049571786,0.00067071285,0.0013506892,0.04195505,0.0172297,0.0054760408,0.007110503,0.0005872773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010711684,0.000004502686,0.000073168136,0.0000131747165,0.0000025692746,0.000025260295,0.0015534703,0.00013435366,0.000037102796,0.9965749,0.00036558884,0.0012051731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005470017,0.000004294391,0.00006375365,0.000027729966,0.0000030692474,0.000014962734,0.00057097635,0.0008087856,0.000058673555,0.99529934,0.003138173,0.0000048494303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031339373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018610202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013093501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004565483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023572105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069245875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203384996","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/7n6rx","title":"Selfless Assertions: Some Empirical Evidence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Assertion; Epistemology; Criticism; Popularity; Norm (philosophy); Attribution; Cognition; Psychology; Natural (archaeology); Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.48663212646851356,"score_gpt":0.3693280784431999,"score_spread":0.11730404802531363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203384996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4867603,0.10070359,0.043884806,0.09829887,0.0020721091,0.0019233051,0.0061100996,0.00026946943,0.25997743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481249,0.018776694,0.010867142,0.012391992,0.0009302378,0.0007040569,0.0030402334,0.00018526734,0.004979498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94860363,0.027905911,0.0051457454,0.007030704,0.010172372,0.0011417462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.17994231,0.72730136,0.02751198,0.03404999,0.029415622,0.0017786479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.065081775,0.0011096215,0.0015155027,0.004409387,0.0030026524,0.004737819,0.006891374,0.005863651,0.050231516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4093387,0.0011992491,0.0009875044,0.0059216814,0.015930347,0.014836588,0.0040921643,0.00696944,0.0056790393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068193004,0.010185809,0.14990824,0.034747235,0.0031337042,0.0023429287,0.06294287,0.0013673079,0.0024923747,0.348038,0.055068042,0.32295427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002536304,0.0021791565,0.2014627,0.02745636,0.0022868519,0.004169541,0.07220986,0.004852241,0.0050637294,0.40790728,0.2694253,0.0004507018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036315015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035290665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065081775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020443392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001925201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34418947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205692119","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3935587","title":"The Ex Post Accuracy of Subjective Beliefs: A New Measure and Decomposition","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Decomposition; Psychology; Statistics; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Data mining; Chemistry","score_opus":0.021414995517094394,"score_gpt":0.2679416412658198,"score_spread":0.24652664574872543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205692119","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4847635,0.00078389316,0.48906088,0.0013158745,0.00023541736,0.00021994852,0.003040661,0.00032915425,0.020250667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94891995,0.0002304933,0.047177415,0.00007116576,0.00022233817,0.00015715414,0.0014295728,0.00009516113,0.0016966669],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835232,0.005813582,0.002405492,0.0028259114,0.0047713867,0.00066039583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75822914,0.15398088,0.023576377,0.04001397,0.021593118,0.002606568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019280702,0.00095880957,0.0011138078,0.00561257,0.0008229606,0.007826549,0.0017648083,0.0015209457,0.006412835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15963739,0.0005942491,0.0011128448,0.0061059105,0.004708576,0.00973489,0.003574491,0.0034288252,0.00083320925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013577957,0.0005977239,0.46362212,0.0006560489,0.0018474987,0.00022563984,0.008962337,0.014316045,0.0036549335,0.19875629,0.002266614,0.303737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013644216,0.0017943545,0.42238525,0.0005937396,0.0012067304,0.0006457127,0.005047605,0.17235656,0.010281873,0.3755642,0.009576943,0.0004106592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020676337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014889296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019280702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011755942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015234605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101967335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207406646","doi":"10.1093/analys/anaa040","title":"Scottish dentistry and broken promises: Woollard on presuppositions and substantial negative facts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.06009612882935518,"score_gpt":0.27451066253296746,"score_spread":0.2144145337036123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207406646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10829748,0.0059120967,0.012117454,0.31986684,0.0011897677,0.000051030576,0.00010751506,0.00007168032,0.5523861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97289586,0.0009312063,0.0014614117,0.013294966,0.00034979964,0.00001817753,0.000015735633,0.00002803896,0.011004857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896908,0.006073443,0.0003203049,0.0010244421,0.0017218315,0.0011692314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97363937,0.020634733,0.00092027226,0.0016766917,0.0023031207,0.0008257902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018107705,0.00034938595,0.000647385,0.0014708107,0.011318342,0.008257451,0.0021015343,0.009268421,0.010571138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024141286,0.00051555235,0.000560057,0.0011598465,0.05591854,0.011074923,0.0069948207,0.0097439,0.0006772798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003052696,0.000017214572,0.0002594084,0.000021547065,0.0000044900553,0.00044208567,0.014244276,0.00013120013,0.00005963088,0.9753372,0.0062110703,0.0032413297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023187424,0.000034573877,0.00093747367,0.00028552438,0.000015423764,0.00027027234,0.018445333,0.0007021294,0.00040181648,0.85636663,0.122459054,0.000058545553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03529663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039902363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03529663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009506676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00507177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0957638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209010997","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/t74ne","title":"Revisiting Norms of Assertion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Cognition; Process (computing); Principal (computer security); Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Computer security","score_opus":0.12385055501636688,"score_gpt":0.2735409270998621,"score_spread":0.14969037208349523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209010997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16707753,0.007088466,0.22717813,0.058894057,0.0024227584,0.0001699906,0.00021763536,0.00027049897,0.536681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753422,0.00091932254,0.017374596,0.0021821389,0.00066955015,0.00015389302,0.00006375055,0.00009589651,0.0031986379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92835015,0.045434244,0.0035872052,0.0069885994,0.013301475,0.0023382828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8140578,0.1191493,0.013130435,0.025852257,0.025443917,0.0023662364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05668546,0.00053564087,0.0010546724,0.0026364343,0.005184659,0.012361701,0.002662819,0.0045637283,0.0038599481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.116920136,0.0005370222,0.00084994064,0.0015742952,0.066583,0.023433613,0.009457453,0.0072530066,0.00064970256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015242354,0.000006382186,0.0003063398,0.000041226358,0.0000039699303,0.000025851798,0.0033846807,0.00009005823,0.00009834893,0.9926779,0.00028630332,0.0030636375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015230436,0.00001621791,0.00032046836,0.000097109805,0.0000070784677,0.00003760829,0.0015228374,0.00057720876,0.0003358047,0.98686326,0.01019387,0.000013347437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027026576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015401389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05668546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052719833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006598859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29978496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210903325","doi":"10.18192/cjcs.vi8.5790","title":"Knowing the Skeptic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conversations The Journal of Cavellian Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Nothing; Philosophy; Dream; Epistemology; Certainty; Shadow (psychology); Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.21538752515290543,"score_gpt":0.3115197297319449,"score_spread":0.09613220457903948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210903325","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020585397,0.008203104,0.01639301,0.58380944,0.009430337,0.000049064252,0.00008946276,0.00018305397,0.36125717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7674887,0.0032366603,0.0053148624,0.15125826,0.006031813,0.000092578295,0.000075311356,0.00021997924,0.0662819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839669,0.007756962,0.0006252338,0.0023268678,0.004163676,0.0011603779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96951574,0.015141396,0.0026599418,0.0039658807,0.0070323064,0.0016847735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014887176,0.0006582312,0.00070780795,0.0015407387,0.008280768,0.015684992,0.0013858231,0.009912541,0.006426522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049166966,0.0004858234,0.00066323415,0.000924446,0.039472323,0.015616857,0.0053420016,0.017997894,0.003672066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003671871,0.000022177637,0.0006538082,0.00007772335,0.000012972212,0.00029830856,0.021080563,0.000060136466,0.00026346734,0.8871218,0.0794488,0.010923496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016576088,0.00002303338,0.00031659106,0.00045201866,0.000017156946,0.00091416494,0.014512835,0.0003245831,0.0006247872,0.4687053,0.5140475,0.00004549337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020715364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016642864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015684992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051577534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005817855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078731835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211784270","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x20001892","title":"Two distinct concepts of knowledge","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Descriptive knowledge; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Body of knowledge","score_opus":0.1791827637263522,"score_gpt":0.3985260757059329,"score_spread":0.2193433119795807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211784270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046957523,0.020716326,0.19784914,0.066584595,0.00224486,0.00029251556,0.00050441065,0.00024043735,0.66461015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89997256,0.0068302043,0.06335457,0.0066767856,0.0014845007,0.0009813504,0.0004993106,0.000127598,0.020073129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98714566,0.005599412,0.00068816956,0.0016957165,0.0035891798,0.0012818576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842153,0.008261853,0.001348421,0.0023730197,0.0023460397,0.0014553188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009498154,0.00091985246,0.0010933132,0.0062389886,0.00357663,0.015162154,0.0024968013,0.005894781,0.0051014787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022158725,0.0005677398,0.000823567,0.0035338525,0.062901236,0.027707627,0.010533916,0.009216783,0.0009273001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000651341,0.0000046515074,0.000073716605,0.000027016884,0.0000022235747,0.000013021685,0.00216445,0.000026613428,0.000034104276,0.99410015,0.0004178107,0.0031296604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009011519,0.000010377517,0.0003633567,0.00012289484,0.000005179669,0.00010034882,0.0023658324,0.00019249773,0.000116817806,0.9750308,0.021669885,0.000013070583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021573112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013009605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015162154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055921944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051274737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050231636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212298668","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3643862","title":"Promises to Keep: Speech Acts and the Value of Reflective Knowledge","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Business; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.052893780357980466,"score_gpt":0.28146849911680993,"score_spread":0.22857471875882945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212298668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13585213,0.006047551,0.07691551,0.13962142,0.0010331414,0.000076119264,0.00011962332,0.000205455,0.6401291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98864263,0.00063357194,0.0039982535,0.0012508552,0.0002683403,0.00004267771,0.000024360155,0.00006176191,0.0050776037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97687984,0.017208453,0.00062681996,0.0015402889,0.0027869358,0.00095755357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8651246,0.10721286,0.0064250287,0.014181336,0.0047073583,0.0023486856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025711015,0.00039777352,0.00053505506,0.0014998427,0.005620924,0.017888395,0.0022680375,0.008206095,0.007946985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10117588,0.0005749418,0.00048983446,0.0013557179,0.039836325,0.026212838,0.0068631996,0.0076361476,0.0010696454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001057818,0.000035995494,0.00084391766,0.00007854142,0.00001987981,0.000176774,0.02998795,0.000439151,0.0002653459,0.94813263,0.0022951372,0.017618943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026417962,0.000025756766,0.00045414342,0.00015863177,0.000023199547,0.00015763118,0.009893565,0.0011418601,0.0005968128,0.96568054,0.021817036,0.000024369629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010678138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074561563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025711015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028279352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004308905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13597447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213320442","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x2000179x","title":"The distinctive character of knowledge","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Action (physics); Social knowledge; Characterization (materials science); Relation (database)","score_opus":0.1501800006378297,"score_gpt":0.3503179901462314,"score_spread":0.20013798950840167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213320442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073075764,0.0068386947,0.38132635,0.039008465,0.0014434833,0.00017400528,0.0005749583,0.00044681327,0.4971114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9443427,0.0015438698,0.03878369,0.0023108576,0.0009773701,0.00022748335,0.00023513459,0.000100475954,0.0114783915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940904,0.0020620544,0.00030632282,0.0016392972,0.0014025605,0.00049936754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99142796,0.004228926,0.0007081436,0.0022365004,0.00087567826,0.0005227819],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036483123,0.00034109302,0.0006972276,0.0021193326,0.0031761455,0.008068686,0.001219712,0.0030906305,0.0040108724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01167497,0.00036837938,0.0007102587,0.001687276,0.040691763,0.012582093,0.0051087267,0.0034416218,0.00070285896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068160516,0.0000038461917,0.0002143907,0.000037572758,0.000007216088,0.000032291322,0.00087913807,0.00010109817,0.00012003621,0.9931899,0.00051294465,0.004894774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006659561,0.000008240747,0.00037040247,0.000036068675,0.0000070567967,0.00012538498,0.00028997377,0.00035218918,0.0001278053,0.9818688,0.016798794,0.000008663807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015485001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097494444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99682385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001981552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001958762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019294322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213733289","doi":"10.1017/psa.2022.65","title":"Prospects for Analogue Confirmation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Analogical reasoning; Computer science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Analogy; Cognitive science; Value (mathematics); Conjecture; Artificial intelligence; Position (finance); Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Psychology; Machine learning; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.11169857541287524,"score_gpt":0.29150062112907327,"score_spread":0.179802045716198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213733289","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05175166,0.009877664,0.35994717,0.2427415,0.004983151,0.00023694105,0.0005115144,0.0008785136,0.32907194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9401362,0.0017164719,0.03801589,0.009827467,0.0019605558,0.00025550817,0.00016020553,0.00011478771,0.007812882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98151934,0.011684381,0.0005453911,0.0023030206,0.0033567457,0.00059113273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8774529,0.09280248,0.0030292103,0.019116255,0.0061439197,0.0014552042],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029120022,0.000633551,0.0013741879,0.0019549215,0.0020974642,0.0048085316,0.003995609,0.0074378783,0.029464645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10467754,0.00061063014,0.0015410682,0.0011836974,0.022428254,0.018892393,0.0068595116,0.010672425,0.0022025441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044985016,0.000025364136,0.00010472135,0.00006618179,0.000012333712,0.00005555787,0.00010119457,0.0008527966,0.00008070882,0.9936838,0.0013129463,0.00365947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038545902,0.000013894282,0.00004691817,0.0000324292,0.0000034942732,0.000032723405,0.000035621433,0.0015961293,0.000061703366,0.9941989,0.0039325994,0.0000070726755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012880248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005918192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033180395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021707295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15400326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214122145","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x20001399","title":"Why is knowledge faster than (true) belief?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Cognition; Cognitive systems; Social cognition; Belief revision","score_opus":0.1649302867177256,"score_gpt":0.3489909621085375,"score_spread":0.18406067539081186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214122145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6008426,0.008553518,0.1777346,0.05554183,0.0039712884,0.00019381935,0.001305696,0.002627817,0.1492289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97683024,0.00068983855,0.01645641,0.0018201356,0.000440245,0.00004522314,0.00022983075,0.00032716105,0.0031610038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920576,0.001958153,0.00040019472,0.0030201671,0.0018817559,0.00068208115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8951559,0.07478499,0.009085676,0.009734289,0.009409878,0.0018292628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009433682,0.00040591825,0.00082016917,0.0012250212,0.0006805333,0.004944006,0.0012437808,0.0031787825,0.013601681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1367555,0.0007220429,0.0007275146,0.0009856311,0.00352731,0.013303061,0.0018104255,0.003744812,0.002940424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002920348,0.00046133963,0.08975003,0.0028174417,0.0007274803,0.0010182902,0.010638595,0.0036753553,0.03496957,0.4429467,0.017219348,0.3928554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026699266,0.00043182372,0.12096625,0.00044110123,0.00024288477,0.001911594,0.0028908807,0.011642741,0.021301305,0.81719595,0.022402203,0.00030617602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023031335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071116193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013601681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011912646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009413281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049890697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216706552","doi":"10.1017/s003441252100041x","title":"Probing the mind of God: divine beliefs and credences","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religious Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09396858306584,"score_gpt":0.30513931156578367,"score_spread":0.21117072849994367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216706552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5703419,0.010040075,0.026851501,0.04956754,0.00038903984,0.00004101848,0.00011550297,0.000026308617,0.34262708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976198,0.0004861602,0.00080928346,0.0004469874,0.000043302913,0.0000052769287,0.0000061820588,0.0000031696213,0.000579719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966281,0.0024631117,0.000082710234,0.00021974894,0.0004527378,0.00015353094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779173,0.017297534,0.0018821295,0.0009821318,0.0011777992,0.00074313435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005696876,0.00019955476,0.00036247273,0.0017162199,0.002208391,0.005399853,0.00074788113,0.0021079627,0.0059449337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024097914,0.00020460034,0.00015738043,0.001254699,0.034817744,0.00799101,0.0043286383,0.0030668029,0.00021420694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006125611,0.00004361184,0.0036103956,0.00015589265,0.000016364207,0.00018068589,0.038603146,0.00036378775,0.00038859725,0.9426944,0.0007039148,0.013177803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014074508,0.00003062997,0.004337485,0.0003925591,0.0000115950525,0.00013142935,0.026718419,0.000760885,0.00029922865,0.95296,0.014319668,0.000023883846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014507283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013990938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059449337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017019187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000936986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0301283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W357019491","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977206","title":"Reasons for Belief","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Rationality; Normative; Perception; Psychology; Cognition; Wish; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0823958830189237,"score_gpt":0.22430197259248152,"score_spread":0.14190608957355783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W357019491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0102314055,0.020123377,0.061895743,0.06680109,0.0015552164,0.00008905609,0.00028990515,0.00015885656,0.83885527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8796501,0.008748362,0.020177582,0.0075502885,0.0012358157,0.00024504354,0.00034958456,0.00016670376,0.08187659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99436474,0.0026276873,0.00029864168,0.0007598456,0.001480015,0.0004691324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921617,0.0048650075,0.0005080239,0.0011063861,0.0011159211,0.00024299184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062338314,0.00055124226,0.0005099246,0.001340536,0.0026943064,0.0077203894,0.0011918118,0.0047273953,0.0076193353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015828164,0.00043851562,0.00071843737,0.00093267194,0.023825593,0.01084363,0.0027794351,0.0057764,0.0018949304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037585341,0.0000020410857,0.00008243831,0.000023518567,0.0000031909738,0.000019256335,0.00071277807,0.00006596209,0.000023253282,0.99348044,0.0022696152,0.0033137791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004907533,0.0000046839705,0.00017625163,0.00008935824,0.000004007658,0.000069975125,0.0004254372,0.0001744566,0.00006035784,0.94270664,0.056277916,0.0000058966366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017722102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014890161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077203894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004643223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029780495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03368908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W38472305","doi":"10.1038/s44320-024-00029-6","title":"Is Gettier\"s First Example Flawed?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute; National Institutes of Health; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; Vector Institute; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Counterexample; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.12685252012595877,"score_gpt":0.25355672144396724,"score_spread":0.12670420131800847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W38472305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003817455,0.06219654,0.060433984,0.31230927,0.025845766,0.0000638171,0.0005184772,0.0026630748,0.5321517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15094277,0.045454174,0.042306244,0.13659836,0.008701289,0.00024765226,0.00060662284,0.0047499877,0.610393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983102,0.0005923035,0.000086122425,0.00031056232,0.0004980675,0.00020277034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980369,0.0009678213,0.00008271829,0.00035918257,0.0003678059,0.00018561506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021016533,0.0009831355,0.0006022367,0.0018893309,0.0034517124,0.0059003416,0.0015095349,0.0036646328,0.017468065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072970693,0.0003951843,0.00074792135,0.0012791314,0.015198881,0.012906195,0.003607262,0.0077396273,0.009374005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004179237,0.000010237677,0.00019731294,0.00015367745,0.0000123592445,0.00018458994,0.0030206952,0.00013942938,0.00027916863,0.6134751,0.33112836,0.05135734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035071441,0.000007812823,0.00010047054,0.00013773669,0.0000052607616,0.0003511599,0.00049425964,0.00015871065,0.00025732355,0.098062836,0.9004062,0.000014694757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006201263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011620675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017468065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031310548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016721546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058436513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200107502","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/q79ku","title":"The Ethics of Nudge: Towards a governance structure for the ethical use of nudge theory by Governments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Nudge theory; Ethical theory; Point (geometry); Political science; Sociology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Economics; Epistemology; Management; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09922172144883287,"score_gpt":0.31732004562958027,"score_spread":0.2180983241807474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200107502","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031882484,0.0037569108,0.5199355,0.16286728,0.0012394325,0.00030090276,0.000060932634,0.00018179488,0.27977484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8558264,0.001383596,0.11999808,0.010633737,0.00041761482,0.0005876877,0.000042910986,0.00018006976,0.010929923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92986643,0.05688138,0.0016226508,0.003105029,0.006592916,0.0019316075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9350068,0.046010382,0.003365459,0.008452275,0.005121501,0.0020435427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.058370627,0.0005992377,0.0010053292,0.003000238,0.009338374,0.016741052,0.0021768713,0.012103709,0.003251964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06708135,0.0007720797,0.0010587052,0.0023713242,0.075593315,0.02007616,0.013609635,0.01159734,0.0007583578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021039468,0.0000037088573,0.000070366346,0.000009698,0.0000011964239,0.000012557761,0.0015893888,0.00013922615,0.000019715644,0.996564,0.00043709006,0.0011509793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010109166,0.000007517769,0.00008678432,0.00016717495,0.0000031477769,0.000037792655,0.0013595226,0.0006468781,0.00013487248,0.9627566,0.034774255,0.000015305857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004120361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003566657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058370627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010076303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016153205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3086971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200286320","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.11.016","title":"On the very idea of pursuitworthiness","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Spell; Epistemology; Computer science; Work (physics); Sociology; Management science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.21600713299829363,"score_gpt":0.3145594462258061,"score_spread":0.09855231322751248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200286320","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054882217,0.01856525,0.14282072,0.1585441,0.002200533,0.00009677591,0.0002855302,0.00018947043,0.62241536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94371986,0.003502706,0.013030121,0.007901367,0.0021536925,0.00014858636,0.000090683694,0.00019175014,0.029261196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689215,0.0015269554,0.00015836253,0.0006220081,0.000550097,0.0002503568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888598,0.007865717,0.0005252239,0.001405747,0.0009306825,0.0004128894],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067845383,0.00047168822,0.00076063577,0.0022863052,0.003725554,0.007354117,0.0018441586,0.005551799,0.007593735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015222923,0.00045229556,0.0007845407,0.0018268767,0.053997576,0.025271561,0.0038228075,0.009793073,0.0009319729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006274534,0.0000025096638,0.000039221333,0.00000806424,0.0000015160294,0.0000059103145,0.00023943385,0.000043347536,0.00001874486,0.99798334,0.0005357113,0.0011159461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006238499,0.00000434804,0.000060527305,0.00001709382,0.0000017017268,0.000012729121,0.00012001301,0.000109277666,0.000028154256,0.993407,0.0062297657,0.0000031396976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021566686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011509921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029132958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016153274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035880506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205467926","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12762","title":"Epistemic blame","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"Research Manitoba","keywords":"Blame; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Key (lock); Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Social psychology; Mathematics; Physics; Computer security","score_opus":0.10752378679218974,"score_gpt":0.2723402997177292,"score_spread":0.16481651292553948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205467926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03153607,0.06627434,0.05754815,0.3104243,0.005980123,0.00008995438,0.00007511018,0.00017081985,0.5279011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9236077,0.024507461,0.005216898,0.025322836,0.0019017669,0.0000920823,0.000041634463,0.00011476276,0.019194864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97890157,0.014326378,0.00048791713,0.0011100703,0.0038304161,0.0013437239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9624383,0.026494313,0.0028278849,0.0024427776,0.004604359,0.0011923724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016450953,0.0006899688,0.0007962221,0.0028953943,0.008701071,0.010200275,0.0019054617,0.006727968,0.009106694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037822813,0.00032269082,0.0006768223,0.0015785369,0.050437782,0.015822029,0.008610568,0.011832089,0.0010784997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014573335,0.000012780482,0.00029666003,0.000191123,0.000008278342,0.00018677222,0.016893432,0.00015574093,0.00007137496,0.96074843,0.00852313,0.012897667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008421546,0.00003399798,0.0007381871,0.0032622023,0.000017184148,0.0010154236,0.025319478,0.00047934803,0.00042332787,0.5798639,0.38878945,0.000048964004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027025368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022881974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016450953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008250873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071889674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08700204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206020775","doi":"10.3138/tjt.2525","title":"Religious Skepticism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Wonder; Religious belief; Epistemology; Philosophy; Belief in God","score_opus":0.028256658126721464,"score_gpt":0.26441364064352274,"score_spread":0.23615698251680128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206020775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4624629,0.0035011782,0.009612751,0.30994454,0.0019104612,0.00007718486,0.000081821934,0.000083192914,0.21232598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989242,0.0002510981,0.00033997017,0.008361041,0.00026515505,0.000011458188,0.000009181992,0.000013698792,0.0015064061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97243655,0.016178744,0.0009340879,0.0018894386,0.007155487,0.0014056804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8894196,0.07626377,0.013676226,0.0054340353,0.012858565,0.0023478088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026636153,0.00038182826,0.00052385184,0.0018958261,0.007764466,0.008418999,0.0015270087,0.009718696,0.00335122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.079529375,0.00044750865,0.0007795588,0.0012312845,0.03351765,0.006646891,0.0057285107,0.01737105,0.00051684934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002693639,0.00015270432,0.017978339,0.00036153162,0.00012329056,0.0028603515,0.3623505,0.00044451043,0.002835929,0.56048256,0.029949153,0.02219187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015800755,0.00024199106,0.017610775,0.002263074,0.00018267872,0.0043678735,0.29655173,0.0035514454,0.004555893,0.3786248,0.29160455,0.00028721313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027042842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001785937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026636153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006646299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003531126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14086711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206105180","doi":"10.1007/s10503-007-9021-7","title":"Book Review","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Social science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.047168097385020986,"score_gpt":0.31497934462574345,"score_spread":0.26781124724072247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206105180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034761196,0.3950786,0.0012886093,0.042993084,0.04408694,0.00010294575,0.0016812999,0.000335441,0.5140855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027211052,0.18498294,0.00086322136,0.014346192,0.014758312,0.00007693786,0.0014942213,0.00020464508,0.78055245],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925464,0.00010294414,0.000034335422,0.00009439356,0.0004443446,0.00006939062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759066,0.0006220265,0.00012837112,0.0001579558,0.0011561501,0.00034484337],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008861438,0.00046124365,0.0008206684,0.003581703,0.0009780709,0.0048377616,0.001504781,0.0022397053,0.29892388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004956962,0.00029431778,0.0004128658,0.0047345823,0.00082781725,0.0028809044,0.0015422263,0.0022823818,0.19924328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067373135,0.000009090773,0.000024487199,0.00026671548,0.0000025944257,0.00002200004,0.000023468378,0.000028394597,0.000040272585,0.004704171,0.9185947,0.07627737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021289184,0.0000019234583,0.00005100023,0.00023448518,0.000001636065,0.00003748655,0.00001809784,0.000004891156,0.00000984815,0.0007883804,0.99884856,0.0000016028287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042456877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009145074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29892388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020654083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038991596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":1},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206171194","doi":"10.3138/9781442690097","title":"High Ideals and Noble Intentions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University; ECW Press (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Noble metal; Materials science; Metallurgy","score_opus":0.06398985151460496,"score_gpt":0.21518210134256385,"score_spread":0.1511922498279589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206171194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058666725,0.0021800539,0.0042896625,0.020310484,0.00037623418,0.000035560428,0.000056853423,0.00005152995,0.914033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93827474,0.0010849071,0.001870708,0.0017755893,0.000057893576,0.000024047204,0.000035365847,0.000054867138,0.056821812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99223524,0.001713536,0.00011896514,0.00044391138,0.0027200286,0.002768189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953519,0.00071098463,0.00025810837,0.0002388697,0.001310745,0.0021293454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005008319,0.0003214528,0.00030474487,0.0012216548,0.018299667,0.01140967,0.0007613966,0.0014238511,0.003792297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005408554,0.00028765431,0.0002425876,0.0012476043,0.058865916,0.0032950696,0.0062262737,0.005689367,0.000907436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010441169,0.000010619966,0.0008552288,0.000015753521,0.0000022664992,0.00007198817,0.0245803,0.00005608904,0.000078334015,0.9606185,0.0066051176,0.0070952573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014121473,0.000021424234,0.00603171,0.00029259018,0.0000108638305,0.00019812562,0.04862945,0.00030343924,0.00036502376,0.52900845,0.4150659,0.000058814225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43391538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54243356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43391538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020613108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04495062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86277944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206396444","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199235018.003.0018","title":"Epistemic Emotions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05733908400313674,"score_gpt":0.22219139445189304,"score_spread":0.1648523104487563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206396444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046268264,0.0047522644,0.013148851,0.008454031,0.00054967793,0.000024490722,0.00003853696,0.00008303218,0.9683223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64173627,0.013357579,0.008834003,0.0076488196,0.0016090091,0.0002562834,0.00015861233,0.0001976562,0.3262017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865025,0.0005875925,0.000056199628,0.00016056726,0.00036606588,0.0001792903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985703,0.00079241523,0.00010905258,0.00014376584,0.0002793802,0.000105084284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012398355,0.00055669184,0.00025217663,0.0007615145,0.0019829746,0.005558933,0.0005730265,0.002438662,0.010020796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004107863,0.00020333969,0.00047939044,0.00045993223,0.007930994,0.007120296,0.0027506747,0.004080635,0.0033541466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011968751,0.000010479789,0.00012261776,0.000088833716,0.000003744039,0.00008931997,0.005490975,0.00013101504,0.0003243068,0.96269506,0.011285176,0.019746602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001003225,0.000021181191,0.00069154927,0.00043088052,0.000013190716,0.0006305939,0.004116022,0.00036433467,0.00059097045,0.46935272,0.5237559,0.000022645096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052209216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050044246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010020796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017380493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010244449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033522904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206566555","doi":"10.5558/tfc86560-5","title":"Of Relevance / Question d’information","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.022516154748655162,"score_gpt":0.2569581286496641,"score_spread":0.23444197390100896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206566555","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013031297,0.025566945,0.120565176,0.42872497,0.015258889,0.0003513201,0.0013656982,0.00043626447,0.39469942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76870817,0.019944323,0.053153295,0.051675435,0.025966344,0.0007694293,0.0016630313,0.00067945494,0.077440545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9395106,0.0365769,0.0033217573,0.005250571,0.013444505,0.0018957116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8883587,0.08172759,0.002592772,0.015791986,0.0104242675,0.001104748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031554777,0.0013029638,0.0021485782,0.005238193,0.0051556155,0.023883153,0.0028028642,0.01461749,0.022576202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1318494,0.0008951631,0.0019565523,0.0045313,0.025487782,0.032924857,0.0064966446,0.015966844,0.005067085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005848591,0.00001736019,0.00021072054,0.00025472252,0.000026208105,0.00017054372,0.0016466893,0.00021682231,0.0001962027,0.966579,0.014788077,0.015835091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051002677,0.00001707988,0.00029608872,0.0004456314,0.000018371597,0.000546881,0.0018663745,0.001035274,0.0008094441,0.6532557,0.3416224,0.000035662768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007878432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035150456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031554777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011269548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009205538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1668796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206679803","doi":"10.1002/9780470413708.refs","title":"References","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Citation; Art history; Media studies; Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.13138853783985668,"score_gpt":0.27233501501254975,"score_spread":0.14094647717269307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206679803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020735888,0.0047741462,0.0022922328,0.0084633,0.0042407075,0.0001351984,0.007439179,0.0004223081,0.9720256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016360832,0.0034886298,0.003130594,0.0031384302,0.00066707644,0.00010897712,0.0060242806,0.0005657515,0.9812401],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874604,0.00018609056,0.00004901372,0.00009609279,0.00084709976,0.00007556211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971464,0.0006042057,0.00007913468,0.0002576452,0.0017400683,0.00017237918],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011388448,0.0005260559,0.0006047722,0.006568337,0.0022916007,0.0033285553,0.0017823525,0.0017471196,0.44040838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006223692,0.00024133055,0.0005346161,0.0070420825,0.0006813441,0.00259803,0.0016014354,0.0021163076,0.3118624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032723979,0.00000988681,0.0000405057,0.000069697235,7.7351353e-7,0.000016965107,0.000075281954,0.000028275002,0.000023424062,0.010344569,0.96421635,0.025171075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011868425,7.050933e-7,0.000105501684,0.00014595017,0.0000010145852,0.0000198153,0.000070282964,0.000011314335,0.000029465104,0.0018370007,0.99777526,0.0000025411543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02498913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05780175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55959165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033270055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003007797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210350043","doi":"10.1163/17455243-20213640","title":"Kowtowing to a Non-natural Realm","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Realm; Doxastic logic; Epistemology; Normative; Natural (archaeology); Irrational number; Philosophy; Modus ponens; Face (sociological concept); Inference; Law; Political science; History; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08923116644136242,"score_gpt":0.27432625688627477,"score_spread":0.18509509044491235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210350043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07162193,0.0034325058,0.13973735,0.10082253,0.0016090131,0.000082837105,0.00017503333,0.000374049,0.6821447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717495,0.0007934459,0.007192931,0.0043289126,0.00025411064,0.000056405974,0.000041162704,0.00013082141,0.01545263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952748,0.0024666085,0.00021623356,0.00080369296,0.0008798097,0.0003588585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99340445,0.0028882555,0.00046952962,0.0018457327,0.0010079637,0.00038403476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049712355,0.00028978844,0.0005607207,0.0010659666,0.004916409,0.006268904,0.0011219799,0.003033161,0.007120889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009999834,0.0003373303,0.00052507635,0.0005917797,0.055622034,0.014698544,0.006522156,0.007467164,0.0010606606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006897246,0.0000048701672,0.00007359153,0.000015757747,0.000002513068,0.000034891313,0.0008073223,0.00006579505,0.00008341621,0.9971988,0.0008577256,0.0008482415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003429568,0.0000036895372,0.000055033353,0.000030311574,0.0000024926787,0.00003976493,0.0005162207,0.00023396524,0.00016205604,0.98673576,0.012211961,0.0000052993514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023166486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002125497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007120889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003175963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026492155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026290715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210825720","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14638488","title":"(Free) Single Sign On Solution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sign (mathematics); Single sign-on; Computer science; Mathematics; Computer security; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.14981881911790296,"score_gpt":0.27777994585119525,"score_spread":0.1279611267332923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210825720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"software","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009799957,0.00081220904,0.26238725,0.017525723,0.009151925,0.0002569264,0.0014390078,0.003159625,0.6954674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27771106,0.0010674238,0.087920874,0.002776336,0.0017662636,0.00047949675,0.0014704027,0.0020439064,0.6247642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977568,0.00064954587,0.00012993258,0.00046577485,0.000687523,0.00031059654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958831,0.001099912,0.00020615385,0.001667107,0.0008467379,0.0002971445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018708692,0.0009948522,0.0010583078,0.0011195329,0.0023399666,0.0051797866,0.0019587593,0.004585603,0.24221934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015186867,0.0004435509,0.0011653062,0.0012823029,0.0024181055,0.007275037,0.008345097,0.003283843,0.057806555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001713921,0.00005283386,0.00016362852,0.00020915715,0.000026347474,0.00022299257,0.00032509927,0.0022707551,0.0014190142,0.82698464,0.102198415,0.065955706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008994147,0.00004688213,0.00012260186,0.00015256011,0.000025740344,0.00022982765,0.00022819749,0.011242519,0.0024442228,0.7157964,0.26957908,0.000042094744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081364025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010618869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24221934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011510969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018622148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8103044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210930766","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14638488.v1","title":"(Free) Single Sign On Solution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sign (mathematics); Single sign-on; Computer science; Mathematics; Computer security; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.14981881911790296,"score_gpt":0.27777994585119525,"score_spread":0.1279611267332923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210930766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"software","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009799957,0.00081220904,0.26238725,0.017525723,0.009151925,0.0002569264,0.0014390078,0.003159625,0.6954674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27771106,0.0010674238,0.087920874,0.002776336,0.0017662636,0.00047949675,0.0014704027,0.0020439064,0.6247642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977568,0.00064954587,0.00012993258,0.00046577485,0.000687523,0.00031059654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958831,0.001099912,0.00020615385,0.001667107,0.0008467379,0.0002971445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018708692,0.0009948522,0.0010583078,0.0011195329,0.0023399666,0.0051797866,0.0019587593,0.004585603,0.24221934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015186867,0.0004435509,0.0011653062,0.0012823029,0.0024181055,0.007275037,0.008345097,0.003283843,0.057806555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001713921,0.00005283386,0.00016362852,0.00020915715,0.000026347474,0.00022299257,0.00032509927,0.0022707551,0.0014190142,0.82698464,0.102198415,0.065955706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008994147,0.00004688213,0.00012260186,0.00015256011,0.000025740344,0.00022982765,0.00022819749,0.011242519,0.0024442228,0.7157964,0.26957908,0.000042094744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081364025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010618869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24221934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011510969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018622148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8103044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212858841","doi":"10.5558/tfc86009-1","title":"Of Relevance / Question d’Information","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Political science","score_opus":0.022516154748655162,"score_gpt":0.2569581286496641,"score_spread":0.23444197390100896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212858841","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013031297,0.025566945,0.120565176,0.42872497,0.015258889,0.0003513201,0.0013656982,0.00043626447,0.39469942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76870817,0.019944323,0.053153295,0.051675435,0.025966344,0.0007694293,0.0016630313,0.00067945494,0.077440545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9395106,0.0365769,0.0033217573,0.005250571,0.013444505,0.0018957116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8883587,0.08172759,0.002592772,0.015791986,0.0104242675,0.001104748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031554777,0.0013029638,0.0021485782,0.005238193,0.0051556155,0.023883153,0.0028028642,0.01461749,0.022576202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1318494,0.0008951631,0.0019565523,0.0045313,0.025487782,0.032924857,0.0064966446,0.015966844,0.005067085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005848591,0.00001736019,0.00021072054,0.00025472252,0.000026208105,0.00017054372,0.0016466893,0.00021682231,0.0001962027,0.966579,0.014788077,0.015835091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051002677,0.00001707988,0.00029608872,0.0004456314,0.000018371597,0.000546881,0.0018663745,0.001035274,0.0008094441,0.6532557,0.3416224,0.000035662768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007878432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035150456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031554777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011269548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009205538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1668796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212931209","doi":"10.1111/meta.12542","title":"Grounding interventionism: Conceptual and epistemological challenges","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Interventionism (politics); Epistemology; Causation; Counterfactual thinking; Impossibility; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Ground; Political science; Law; International relations; Politics","score_opus":0.20608622477043415,"score_gpt":0.275872038539246,"score_spread":0.06978581376881188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212931209","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025504379,0.024633681,0.47412917,0.39253128,0.0013825117,0.00013639982,0.00019153378,0.00027205658,0.081218965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86840445,0.0085722655,0.1045892,0.011317566,0.0025004726,0.0006991156,0.00013621157,0.00021761257,0.003563141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9525157,0.032012742,0.0017261108,0.0053574503,0.0067318976,0.0016561381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8597179,0.11753549,0.0050911293,0.010411573,0.005355022,0.0018888653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.065718725,0.0013836273,0.0034295989,0.0056367186,0.0072305934,0.015711118,0.008424441,0.011909044,0.006206187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06051659,0.0013943452,0.0021818494,0.0040807263,0.12482132,0.040662847,0.014667051,0.020852074,0.00074234157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032913854,0.000007152338,0.000031749132,0.000030674008,0.0000035215432,0.0000071546438,0.0004762329,0.00020157672,0.000006828194,0.99728847,0.00019727073,0.0017461888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005226243,0.0000023699365,0.000013238578,0.00003246994,0.000001226539,0.0000050911844,0.00029250325,0.00034248483,0.000014829444,0.9976146,0.0016724376,0.0000035010492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030799226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021105532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065718725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010805775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009782421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34755802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220671018","doi":"10.1080/02691728.2022.2040637","title":"Optimizing Individual and Collective Reliability: A Puzzle","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Epistemology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Reliability (semiconductor); Voting; Crowds; Democracy; Sociology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Law; Mathematics; Philosophy; Power (physics); Statistics; Politics","score_opus":0.06759999381491154,"score_gpt":0.27686283821425467,"score_spread":0.20926284439934312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220671018","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29204047,0.0071159494,0.330269,0.14699285,0.00085941504,0.00018834612,0.00034753073,0.00034861636,0.22183783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801871,0.0007730854,0.012793537,0.002000474,0.0004845297,0.00013012887,0.00004027738,0.000118481665,0.0034722965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97271514,0.014445059,0.0012476556,0.003954807,0.0056910077,0.0019462538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8973305,0.06877268,0.010383813,0.013938091,0.00587935,0.0036955625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03243337,0.0006855054,0.0022224742,0.0014271798,0.003253193,0.0063190726,0.0021755476,0.004366524,0.0057881195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09765691,0.0007783311,0.0011602996,0.0011597241,0.016611604,0.014371463,0.0074872607,0.007266196,0.001209103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014270259,0.0000764525,0.0035755404,0.00021628503,0.00010609712,0.000130853,0.002285094,0.0077066305,0.00063706865,0.944275,0.0037968056,0.037051506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034914243,0.00003182463,0.0018020667,0.00006001355,0.00002135466,0.00006267273,0.0006717915,0.00402949,0.00029629678,0.988896,0.00406493,0.000028645542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019545243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010822548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03243337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029374005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003471677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17152613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220722819","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i1.7211","title":"Is Every Definition Persuasive?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Meaning (existential); Term (time); Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14162785444208084,"score_gpt":0.26839635873142303,"score_spread":0.1267685042893422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220722819","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03955633,0.028469272,0.111518234,0.466871,0.0066473354,0.0001346696,0.00017334947,0.00034709892,0.3462827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9239072,0.0043961797,0.025131134,0.030891938,0.0025964202,0.00024794883,0.00020200183,0.00037691573,0.012250225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9542015,0.033323344,0.0018777212,0.0037405961,0.0057946127,0.0010622377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9377609,0.04180244,0.0038925316,0.0061994586,0.009093614,0.0012510066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029635075,0.0006410246,0.001077146,0.0023219604,0.00498365,0.009772808,0.002162297,0.0061353003,0.0053487527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06973421,0.00051605754,0.0009982103,0.0014695597,0.042615235,0.022533417,0.0055180616,0.008072351,0.0016060966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026021879,0.000011574238,0.0002917089,0.00019536616,0.000022955994,0.00006489214,0.009914479,0.00004929117,0.00019179602,0.97372955,0.0079580685,0.0075442865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029278644,0.000026296215,0.00033801078,0.00048519776,0.00003964008,0.0002629588,0.009600112,0.00029809584,0.00076335133,0.7923864,0.19573264,0.000038069502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009772433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087966956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029635075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032390316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002756584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15672714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220957334","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192859549.001.0001","title":"On Believing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07669755258246316,"score_gpt":0.2562382750942365,"score_spread":0.17954072251177336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220957334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017808678,0.006852294,0.04065389,0.04493134,0.0010381376,0.000049920312,0.0001498886,0.0000907125,0.88842505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9178878,0.0045751617,0.009297239,0.0081925485,0.0008722498,0.000115711635,0.0002183059,0.000094286916,0.058746573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742043,0.0014103879,0.00007409823,0.00027670548,0.000610776,0.00020757712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961492,0.0025715802,0.0001555597,0.00040520018,0.00055265636,0.00016583155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024532964,0.00042738125,0.00037583392,0.0009168451,0.002431248,0.00419725,0.001041262,0.002774362,0.011154829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006567382,0.00026935508,0.00038782775,0.00056942465,0.01876572,0.006876287,0.00279755,0.0046998463,0.0016097726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050994886,0.0000052461223,0.00007323091,0.000015806392,0.0000016990151,0.000033297398,0.0014525651,0.00007524035,0.000026167276,0.9929645,0.0022863764,0.003060852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005436293,0.000008540215,0.00013180193,0.00007848906,0.0000031796828,0.00008460524,0.0006534246,0.00028697264,0.000081931306,0.9401665,0.058493882,0.000005330688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002664025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017339893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011154829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002686452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009685382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03731662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221147807","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2022.1.13641","title":"Epistemic Agency and the Value of Knowledge and Belief","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.032117502596920575,"score_gpt":0.2484859545414973,"score_spread":0.2163684519445767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221147807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123220064,0.011120981,0.12423612,0.059171174,0.00034730684,0.00006680607,0.00025812557,0.00012196174,0.68145746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98981184,0.0010076133,0.0035637538,0.00055042974,0.00016507161,0.00003974517,0.000035216533,0.000021592366,0.0048047747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926508,0.004526368,0.00029141476,0.0007968139,0.0011193998,0.0006151637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821876,0.012441264,0.0015293192,0.0019173264,0.00129374,0.0006307062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067984234,0.00048207576,0.0005789836,0.0019416967,0.0023032562,0.010454538,0.0011226257,0.0032171875,0.004849444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016342305,0.00039874698,0.00082393904,0.0018203581,0.030631147,0.013769945,0.0045355414,0.0033974114,0.000535645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010882221,0.0000059641143,0.00015838047,0.000017881417,0.0000070667597,0.000026982552,0.00083151006,0.00030559397,0.00003232112,0.99609655,0.00028229633,0.0022246072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005958948,0.0000031601858,0.00011382345,0.000017425522,0.0000036884496,0.000016485445,0.00019053936,0.000367485,0.00003231666,0.99666697,0.0025779763,0.000004033745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020497912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011512476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010454538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004956734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018073219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035963833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224316046","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190907686.013.13","title":"Anonymous Welfarism, Critical-Level Principles, and the Repugnant and Sadistic Conclusions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Neutrality; Sadistic personality disorder; Population; Positive economics; Economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Personality; Demography","score_opus":0.10246191585107117,"score_gpt":0.23439640359040168,"score_spread":0.1319344877393305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224316046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087618336,0.0019368407,0.27856642,0.031304535,0.0009614478,0.00018394054,0.00023792463,0.0001371329,0.5990534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9276104,0.00045938013,0.04446144,0.0035491616,0.0004647429,0.00025391867,0.000076779135,0.000060092912,0.023064015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99201316,0.004100116,0.0002897203,0.0008856838,0.0021631,0.00054823904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919996,0.004162431,0.00062593684,0.0010484074,0.0016783606,0.00048515562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009844286,0.00051655655,0.0006381767,0.0014006944,0.0025186625,0.0040455502,0.0016246119,0.002412142,0.006703733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01379556,0.00029661244,0.0011908767,0.00064681296,0.012430175,0.0038077629,0.0037194588,0.0045158463,0.0008001667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008542627,0.0000062302156,0.00007606935,0.000013755981,0.0000050873696,0.000016454178,0.00018432701,0.0003881328,0.0000550884,0.9956766,0.0009950153,0.002574667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005494453,0.00000995682,0.00009915775,0.0000182244,0.0000035192008,0.000016048303,0.000109323046,0.0007591339,0.000097751894,0.99397874,0.0048963497,0.00000638827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091869844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011190019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009844286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030507124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001628562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052062213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225136396","doi":"10.35995/jci02010007","title":"Figleaves Right and Left: A Case-Study of Viewpoint Diversity Applied to the Philosophy of Language","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Controversial Ideas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Politics; Epistemology; Social science; Sociology; Statement (logic); Public relations; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.031485674297283585,"score_gpt":0.24885086865458853,"score_spread":0.21736519435730495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225136396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86849266,0.0010575319,0.014441122,0.01778071,0.00029716536,0.000089462344,0.00007808404,0.000064251566,0.097699106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98912024,0.00031266414,0.0031553034,0.0011800046,0.000047627982,0.00004927783,0.000022554881,0.00006722158,0.0060451506],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833482,0.013828036,0.00023100208,0.0008181491,0.00092607085,0.00084850006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97756755,0.01791417,0.001328762,0.001409202,0.00063126633,0.0011490444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010484337,0.000835874,0.0008265864,0.0018491554,0.021787787,0.008183152,0.0020518093,0.0074684047,0.006686026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024561819,0.0006081895,0.0008357514,0.0020360674,0.022138365,0.009748599,0.007948361,0.009669381,0.00086344534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008203812,0.00009031615,0.0036548907,0.00007413732,0.000011008868,0.018168272,0.8496873,0.0001703779,0.0008269682,0.11722862,0.0027374353,0.007268647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034919205,0.0000724068,0.0019297537,0.00028463406,0.00001681518,0.009556496,0.8863012,0.0010996632,0.0009361392,0.028130027,0.07158449,0.00005340786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01026013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022109248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021787787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004045975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022473328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05544716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226323143","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4077726","title":"Resolute and Correlated Bayesians","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.019072471079439105,"score_gpt":0.22331493309851702,"score_spread":0.20424246201907792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226323143","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056944795,0.002771722,0.84686595,0.026239784,0.00031037655,0.00017296932,0.0009382755,0.0003064164,0.065449744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8465192,0.0023488924,0.12655376,0.0029620037,0.001565307,0.00060315715,0.0011592202,0.00024299421,0.018045519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95686877,0.027289877,0.0017725747,0.0058302297,0.006435051,0.0018035133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67221355,0.27510658,0.012101647,0.026865253,0.010784009,0.0029289648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04255426,0.0013792234,0.004413875,0.00443366,0.004792603,0.011938387,0.004843952,0.0065092472,0.01391302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23151048,0.002334515,0.0030728783,0.0048107225,0.01716052,0.023600403,0.0076176296,0.0125881145,0.0016002236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013820587,0.000009446426,0.00020192246,0.000019888515,0.00002435818,0.000017832353,0.00012304548,0.0015649975,0.000010418197,0.9960879,0.00054440455,0.0013819342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007955349,0.0000015796835,0.00004609737,0.000010339865,0.0000053134945,0.000009412776,0.000016092885,0.0037536991,0.000010132006,0.99578035,0.00035480584,0.0000043215587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048049274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057719764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04255426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056536696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047225095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2250511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226450307","doi":"10.1017/s0012217321000299","title":"Civility, Trust, and Responding to Echo Chambers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Compromise; Distrust; Echo (communications protocol); Chorus; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Computer science; Computer security; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.05978608826616006,"score_gpt":0.2795026484633342,"score_spread":0.21971656019717417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226450307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3605105,0.0011849842,0.032315478,0.08567828,0.00091750524,0.00012262838,0.000046100115,0.00013670755,0.51908785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952312,0.00008674717,0.00048235265,0.001493258,0.00005582229,0.000013080524,0.000003984646,0.00002364422,0.0026098103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94891244,0.039771736,0.0013993775,0.0019298658,0.0047403937,0.0032461465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8760979,0.08185014,0.018460691,0.006642829,0.008889468,0.008059057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03227139,0.0003214859,0.00040508652,0.0009578655,0.00882116,0.013172898,0.0010441054,0.0066298665,0.009441746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11079239,0.00032933033,0.00029368768,0.0006329824,0.027674144,0.008425454,0.009660854,0.0066816765,0.0013569244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021315711,0.00011412655,0.009663159,0.00022362759,0.000059015958,0.0015193578,0.27710274,0.0009865576,0.002181559,0.67903775,0.008441203,0.020457814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006280659,0.00021431051,0.008786693,0.00086823455,0.000069010865,0.0012597956,0.2861963,0.0036828811,0.002831174,0.5148712,0.18094723,0.00021035066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023016143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018768017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03227139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034694227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041839383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17066944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229068784","doi":"10.1007/s11406-022-00513-z","title":"Abilism, Ableism, and Reliabilism’s Achievement Gap: A Normative Argument for A New Paradigm in Epistemology","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Philosophy of language; Thought experiment; Metaphysics; Biology","score_opus":0.09264403375102466,"score_gpt":0.2843770374792366,"score_spread":0.19173300372821195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229068784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0656027,0.0037902382,0.22942397,0.18949102,0.0014214404,0.0000979359,0.0003429463,0.00023908699,0.5095907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96440125,0.000579206,0.022386028,0.004431547,0.0006824292,0.00027489636,0.00009629049,0.00013093221,0.0070173712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923355,0.0039780005,0.00040314646,0.0011614178,0.0014731177,0.000648814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807488,0.012832826,0.0010254066,0.0025915033,0.0019293014,0.00087208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014116719,0.0008072878,0.0016444315,0.0035198173,0.006241274,0.009284144,0.0031136465,0.0067113456,0.009295177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02343117,0.0007100746,0.0017037553,0.0021161756,0.049904842,0.025135456,0.009923991,0.013225746,0.0010614773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051245297,0.000004777266,0.00002538437,0.0000070635538,0.0000017574864,0.0000046236573,0.00023425055,0.000043104064,0.000009786752,0.9990012,0.00023735788,0.00042555196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072541707,0.0000017596393,0.000023283585,0.000008711382,0.0000016709687,0.0000068947747,0.00011383688,0.00016381775,0.000024169087,0.9982838,0.0013622548,0.0000025345332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019935083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014963064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014116719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004549099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004606582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07465726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229513038","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198852834.001.0001","title":"Prejudice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08718266495232815,"score_gpt":0.2533728501548577,"score_spread":0.16619018520252957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229513038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010398954,0.0028010635,0.00079390063,0.012731177,0.0017219887,0.000054986092,0.00018318686,0.000059170983,0.97125554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2862887,0.0044938675,0.0010379134,0.023741247,0.0010929808,0.00009920268,0.00054092234,0.000105119616,0.6826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979443,0.0006244474,0.00009266551,0.00022976246,0.00063983555,0.0004690105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984419,0.000272834,0.00017839202,0.00028310053,0.00050349726,0.00032037302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011427178,0.0005307604,0.00048046137,0.0010465133,0.004239962,0.004878412,0.0006749327,0.0023216412,0.086903855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004502582,0.00017415365,0.00039241064,0.00074173626,0.002862006,0.0025525556,0.003852762,0.003334383,0.026874475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041881183,0.00013432701,0.0056397347,0.00024141534,0.000022104208,0.0007890915,0.013785694,0.00020224036,0.0006922588,0.46594363,0.34067363,0.17183408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005153541,0.00002597238,0.0020014052,0.00025585998,0.000004603236,0.00041755868,0.003191652,0.000048011763,0.00013709272,0.025920711,0.9679813,0.000010675932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003864874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045357095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086903855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015016627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013363671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229698470","doi":"10.1002/tht.27","title":"Aha! Trick Questions, Independence, and the Epistemology of Disagreement","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Epistemology; Independence (probability theory); sort; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.039163960784125124,"score_gpt":0.2591638248835249,"score_spread":0.21999986409939978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229698470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10175768,0.0029224511,0.36459392,0.08566601,0.001093239,0.00026034992,0.00032496135,0.00046225934,0.44291902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9549253,0.0003633771,0.030885825,0.0036644635,0.0003444144,0.00024363109,0.000114424474,0.00014147685,0.009316979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96627307,0.022569189,0.001380292,0.0029834914,0.004767236,0.0020267377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9271019,0.056803748,0.002746536,0.008573394,0.003512528,0.0012618923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029009199,0.00076505204,0.0012827929,0.0028640602,0.012598905,0.0081391735,0.0029419593,0.009909796,0.009733935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066902034,0.00095620775,0.001786527,0.0020228636,0.052102152,0.024496272,0.01299333,0.013951642,0.0012640427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002440712,0.000009442208,0.0003343318,0.000031063286,0.0000064404758,0.00015863677,0.003600514,0.00016399055,0.00007302718,0.99158174,0.0014706027,0.0025457325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002412485,0.0000069620182,0.00015012089,0.000048274072,0.0000053286567,0.00020902575,0.0011662262,0.0011465912,0.00020785094,0.9826888,0.01433129,0.00001548798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024309498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013397456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029009199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003871886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002243363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15341711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229710647","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/ahrzt","title":"The Point of Assertion is to Transmit Knowledge","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Cognition; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1366534153234211,"score_gpt":0.3196607569625679,"score_spread":0.1830073416391468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229710647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07559211,0.0032451325,0.37222508,0.070673965,0.002382365,0.00015678754,0.0002414658,0.00047907262,0.47500402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94162613,0.0012585726,0.037621178,0.0036619373,0.0010753378,0.00014361477,0.00011849085,0.00015340699,0.014341352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757941,0.012703748,0.0015146168,0.0030212316,0.0059477594,0.0010185335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95085657,0.026472054,0.005612648,0.008249068,0.007610784,0.0011987354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016851991,0.00047182923,0.0006933708,0.0017499252,0.0037203704,0.008460727,0.0016118024,0.0058617196,0.006886917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043413676,0.0004981238,0.0007905324,0.0014255912,0.029031603,0.01608058,0.0054351212,0.005486399,0.0022598032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002519639,0.000014406009,0.0006063771,0.000095928975,0.000018965618,0.00011697742,0.0054408973,0.00010752382,0.0006128413,0.9834869,0.0012787359,0.008195192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019972864,0.000030481277,0.00069383736,0.0002389471,0.000027007412,0.00025664808,0.0023601686,0.00058855145,0.0013434965,0.9544456,0.039971996,0.000023199129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012136942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007513407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016851991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018758684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002875075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08912289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230029321","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-35713-8_12","title":"Truth Values","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in physics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Truth value; Interpretation (philosophy); Coherence theory of truth; Truth function; Statement (logic); Topos theory; Theoretical physics; Quantum logic; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Interpretations of quantum mechanics; Quantum nonlocality; Quantum; Physics; Logical truth; Pure mathematics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Quantum mechanics; Pragmatic theory of truth; Computer science; Quantum process; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05558997345585254,"score_gpt":0.25415924037280946,"score_spread":0.19856926691695692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230029321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005178815,0.0017532249,0.05936445,0.0067832456,0.0005806381,0.00008867917,0.00067716785,0.00019136442,0.9253825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6918757,0.0032674533,0.052356906,0.0038183571,0.0018112236,0.00049082784,0.0020452798,0.00045776894,0.2438765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957385,0.0015120909,0.00027300604,0.0010685062,0.0010253697,0.00038253746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663264,0.0013830361,0.00019740872,0.0007801198,0.0008342529,0.00017246495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003155296,0.0008531128,0.0008279825,0.0025150985,0.0033777135,0.009790369,0.0013219254,0.0028541582,0.05360136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009798171,0.0006783307,0.00081304344,0.0017163386,0.007903485,0.011813026,0.0030736467,0.0041904976,0.010255071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006710015,0.000005660522,0.00003433593,0.000018574676,0.0000044122594,0.00001052728,0.00016701272,0.00006173652,0.000054560227,0.992619,0.002715401,0.0043021794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054771062,0.0000034399948,0.00004521963,0.000031844942,0.0000054051557,0.000027359847,0.000115775045,0.00017643941,0.00017268438,0.97114986,0.0282626,0.0000039576053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092922605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009199349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05360136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032057804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00148244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17931437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230128308","doi":"10.22215/etd/2010-09338","title":"Thought, meaning and reference : cognitive and contextualist challenges to the truth-conditional view of meaning","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Cognition; Humanities; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10891077232366742,"score_gpt":0.3166733871971906,"score_spread":0.2077626148735232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230128308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10690339,0.01919572,0.22379795,0.28322598,0.0010246746,0.00008564764,0.00050347444,0.0002236915,0.36503953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97242844,0.0025907233,0.018162431,0.0024014236,0.0006643478,0.0001191044,0.00012093919,0.00011469867,0.0033979476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929125,0.004971161,0.0003048903,0.0007251542,0.00081331684,0.0002730953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752897,0.019245299,0.0010641689,0.0023327803,0.00152142,0.0005466484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009980008,0.00051816663,0.00084281416,0.0024991445,0.0049276613,0.013386985,0.0025084598,0.0046297223,0.0051710266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02556798,0.000661647,0.0009049265,0.0030970075,0.060098607,0.029571975,0.0047467966,0.007580526,0.00059524644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012016716,0.000008963545,0.000072580944,0.00002802833,0.0000044265917,0.000023820183,0.0051158937,0.00015741981,0.000031385567,0.99128574,0.00070740894,0.0025521717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008521675,0.0000017017622,0.000081993465,0.000040441606,0.0000029921393,0.00001720774,0.0016986612,0.00030165393,0.000036678455,0.9942504,0.003555642,0.0000040715336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009606004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008321635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013386985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063460437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006492894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052779973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230413506","doi":"10.1017/s0012217310000466","title":"Knowing Persons","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.054448058937236705,"score_gpt":0.26216938296328474,"score_spread":0.20772132402604804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230413506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003709474,0.0020018087,0.0064594042,0.009449682,0.00079225533,0.000050908104,0.00029310683,0.00011186914,0.9771314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39186668,0.0064642956,0.0060339835,0.0065157134,0.0013733603,0.00019323379,0.0011593045,0.00019961027,0.58619374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980453,0.00080400065,0.00011078328,0.0004141963,0.00036075222,0.00026490257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857867,0.00043286145,0.00015693043,0.00034642688,0.00029133869,0.00019383535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013627704,0.0005063989,0.0003207686,0.0011400225,0.003950246,0.0067957193,0.00076804,0.0025527098,0.09700338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036537522,0.00023166301,0.0004247044,0.001282645,0.005771391,0.009040356,0.0041284105,0.0023197322,0.024145555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016297248,0.0000114832455,0.0002846024,0.00007076218,0.0000034834616,0.00012149175,0.005185497,0.00003973565,0.000104495484,0.92844284,0.039866734,0.025852548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005016645,0.000011586057,0.0003801609,0.00014075979,0.0000045468632,0.00028662602,0.002780008,0.00005867769,0.00018094592,0.10320439,0.89293885,0.000008475013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029283785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026274608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09700338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027545323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002157156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3245086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230708296","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/r5htu","title":"From virtue epistemology to abilism: theoretical and empirical developments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Wake Forest University; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Epistemology; Virtue; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Epistemic virtue; Empirical research; Social epistemology; Cognition; Empirical evidence; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09056768956157125,"score_gpt":0.324400382215548,"score_spread":0.23383269265397677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230708296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053517975,0.2436456,0.084918424,0.1654466,0.002982205,0.00010093519,0.00017156053,0.00014357253,0.44907308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82198924,0.12976302,0.025693364,0.010136682,0.0043935077,0.0001938498,0.00018969111,0.00013537763,0.0075052455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930434,0.003989715,0.00028052376,0.0006519164,0.0016961462,0.00033823785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9342842,0.057690643,0.0023009046,0.0016288835,0.002837225,0.0012582218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01218502,0.00056725624,0.0010620357,0.0064376453,0.003365194,0.011700887,0.00190216,0.0043129204,0.009964585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027273715,0.0004362117,0.0005098685,0.007287584,0.028583866,0.017644389,0.005367602,0.0076846904,0.0013091456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007733756,0.00003066547,0.0004937321,0.00025246473,0.000006308329,0.000037367936,0.001139523,0.00012344569,0.000025505815,0.98244137,0.0016887038,0.013753236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004825433,0.000010591141,0.00096075586,0.00093361153,0.0000058127944,0.000096483804,0.0021499265,0.0006637274,0.00007281584,0.96459264,0.03049703,0.000011834341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014197018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012539887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01218502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004457207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045182672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06444132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231089120","doi":"10.32920/14636133.v1","title":"Truth, Superassertability, and Conceivability","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Epistemology; Statement (logic); Wright; Argument (complex analysis); Coherence theory of truth; Philosophy; Pragmatic theory of truth; Legitimacy; Truth condition; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10081561519758016,"score_gpt":0.29297838797343123,"score_spread":0.1921627727758511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231089120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15671322,0.009635283,0.3716669,0.040752,0.0005671225,0.00010511301,0.00036679074,0.000368655,0.41982487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982018,0.0010652208,0.011977577,0.00058614276,0.0002588778,0.000062744744,0.000091385664,0.000057779198,0.0038822913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571013,0.0021056205,0.00021268589,0.0007357111,0.0008904618,0.00034533357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895042,0.007017481,0.00082602823,0.001619024,0.0006882813,0.0003449074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066443756,0.0004474873,0.0007283749,0.0019285777,0.0023381193,0.0064149164,0.0014378985,0.0026693018,0.007878361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014130264,0.00044453205,0.0008833072,0.0015029924,0.03241096,0.014427212,0.005348512,0.0062669287,0.0007021139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049266932,0.0000039001757,0.00012397635,0.000014030935,0.0000023641799,0.000025263897,0.000573534,0.00008606185,0.000047174424,0.99743587,0.00017347427,0.0015094763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031175318,0.000002808409,0.00006990449,0.0000119287215,0.000001819238,0.000030508098,0.00015522736,0.00021009975,0.00005782434,0.99766797,0.0017859209,0.000002701825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012741048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070770405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007878361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025703572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012583247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035139263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232158781","doi":"10.1017/s0012217320000116","title":"Introduction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Spell; Philosophy; Sketch; Epistemology; Triangulation; Miller; Sociology; Theology; Computer science; Cartography","score_opus":0.07974375601866021,"score_gpt":0.24270391303687702,"score_spread":0.1629601570182168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232158781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001361141,0.0048257625,0.00848725,0.04839506,0.009552883,0.00016796366,0.002636461,0.0005577259,0.92401576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045225833,0.007349763,0.007594406,0.024804695,0.0049756295,0.00038871364,0.0042765047,0.00075940916,0.90462506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975483,0.00063098886,0.00009487231,0.00057646533,0.0009048292,0.00024456918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965526,0.0007712325,0.00017092835,0.00044550095,0.0016110713,0.00044866334],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020874965,0.00072697125,0.00046279014,0.0014849585,0.003406643,0.007967175,0.0021566397,0.0037156318,0.3239955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077763926,0.00036501783,0.0006137503,0.0016376674,0.00236188,0.0051993793,0.004090948,0.004455692,0.14164893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004228773,0.000031424555,0.0004600804,0.000228959,0.000005269279,0.00008734815,0.0017654699,0.000115697294,0.00018886857,0.24793467,0.683714,0.065425895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027282329,0.000006608954,0.00018652652,0.00017651389,0.0000015747347,0.0000378042,0.0003688716,0.000028309636,0.000051847994,0.00961462,0.98951995,0.0000046735786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008333674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006067064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3239955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00422943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041765464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9642384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232487124","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_100596","title":"Collective Beliefs","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.07497944928657534,"score_gpt":0.2425566575904702,"score_spread":0.1675772083038949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232487124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006735149,0.0009926825,0.023892194,0.0056997896,0.00025510392,0.000050851544,0.00009691337,0.00006979656,0.96220756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6423429,0.0018361829,0.016611315,0.0024270553,0.0004526906,0.00026204874,0.00039777442,0.0001435105,0.33552653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981914,0.0006329415,0.00006508251,0.00043551804,0.0005083646,0.00016663744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834776,0.0005722728,0.00012235089,0.00047756263,0.00034046767,0.00013958367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020715836,0.00049136364,0.00041056293,0.0012829767,0.0028968786,0.0074396674,0.0012002988,0.0022690995,0.03377304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046769585,0.00030457845,0.0003874558,0.0009694346,0.011211384,0.0060820053,0.0030055586,0.003326817,0.004764839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043635346,0.000008711989,0.00008578824,0.000021903359,0.0000048383044,0.0000147173405,0.0026111307,0.00006746195,0.000093904906,0.98562175,0.0033637718,0.008101686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008754556,0.000014409506,0.0004651714,0.00016875807,0.000010929481,0.00006531269,0.0026815038,0.0003577574,0.00027607818,0.8243294,0.17161141,0.000010514788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020673238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027683107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03377304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028726317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022573124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112982035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232561879","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/2huft","title":"How to Do Better: Toward Normalizing Experimentation in Epistemology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Epistemology of Wikipedia; Epistemology; Introspection; Social epistemology; Formal epistemology; Philosophy; Meta-epistemology; Commonsense knowledge; Experimental philosophy; Commonsense reasoning; Field (mathematics); Philosophical methodology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1435987317532526,"score_gpt":0.32005415634754397,"score_spread":0.17645542459429137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232561879","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023417246,0.0065467423,0.5370393,0.2010444,0.0031190508,0.0006073568,0.00012537617,0.0011376092,0.22696295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64215267,0.0028778582,0.3103892,0.026277859,0.0015218606,0.0028321901,0.00011308607,0.0012285331,0.012606778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8257833,0.13467194,0.0051792036,0.014636045,0.016906612,0.0028228858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77924865,0.14091624,0.009378561,0.050054807,0.015693711,0.004708002],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1280599,0.0015144914,0.0028932916,0.0038674208,0.0097987065,0.028785832,0.004935514,0.010631671,0.004689835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17900471,0.0012863636,0.0018037313,0.0029545226,0.17110424,0.05233787,0.02361712,0.024576403,0.0016026717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014464221,0.00003088129,0.0001895873,0.00006829297,0.000011591378,0.000020691137,0.0062494758,0.0002534736,0.0001947901,0.98676246,0.0008101202,0.0053941095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014844155,0.000010510284,0.000047609956,0.00013117504,0.000007903243,0.000015835116,0.0014889668,0.00039995505,0.00040523073,0.9812227,0.016241454,0.0000138421465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026929178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019312891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87194014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012495611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018957894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67725354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232575378","doi":"10.1215/00318108-3321751","title":"<i>Epistemological Disjunctivism</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; General interest","score_opus":0.13529463736851016,"score_gpt":0.29880055248784515,"score_spread":0.163505915119335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232575378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010298781,0.025252115,0.06986847,0.27777907,0.004721576,0.00006667486,0.00021930716,0.0002291578,0.6115648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7074017,0.015421,0.038880337,0.11031613,0.014524021,0.000705928,0.0004354504,0.00043148233,0.111883864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996714,0.0012729284,0.00013713064,0.0007162231,0.0008851435,0.0002745027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99607277,0.0023067025,0.00026466302,0.00057533226,0.00057788676,0.00020267045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029261503,0.0005296334,0.000522078,0.0012676578,0.004152056,0.009011874,0.0018570414,0.0032168098,0.010267512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064745867,0.00041542645,0.0006719025,0.0013294638,0.023726676,0.01207487,0.004641811,0.010135376,0.0022893408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006174772,0.000006740677,0.00008628206,0.000029801451,0.0000031814902,0.000031455573,0.00065161893,0.000058228787,0.000041860305,0.97594154,0.020242477,0.0029007068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050308904,0.0000074659756,0.0002060232,0.00008864616,0.0000031243435,0.00010452084,0.0005659749,0.00035810992,0.00019268836,0.85077196,0.14768493,0.000011485123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003845847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026672285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010267512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047334903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025406627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03434831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233557003","doi":"10.32920/14753850","title":"Externalism, Memory, and Self-Knowledge","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Externalism; Doctrine; Epistemology; Individuation; Self-knowledge; Subject (documents); Inclusion (mineral); Psychology; Value (mathematics); A priori and a posteriori; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Mathematics; Computer science; Theology","score_opus":0.07167107920821292,"score_gpt":0.290100854881818,"score_spread":0.2184297756736051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233557003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24649715,0.013917677,0.06031738,0.025866708,0.00029789793,0.000041847292,0.00016799288,0.0001499806,0.65274334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98905635,0.0012833101,0.0025601825,0.00042834508,0.0001456298,0.00002374029,0.000047328656,0.000022022215,0.006433205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882144,0.0005178413,0.000062529856,0.00023068665,0.00023370102,0.00013379389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664694,0.002009525,0.00035899287,0.0005428551,0.0002895205,0.00015202702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017799989,0.00027001306,0.00034821616,0.0013505747,0.0014554982,0.0059523275,0.00072908145,0.0014831235,0.0039825253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004887553,0.00015847279,0.00029311562,0.0012266284,0.02221007,0.008388973,0.003468557,0.0018838187,0.00033136707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013602274,0.000016459004,0.0005978905,0.000038315873,0.0000061521746,0.000048242648,0.0021236767,0.00016242487,0.00009261718,0.9887599,0.000458975,0.0076817246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044787935,0.000004852115,0.00045834275,0.000029878895,0.0000029648565,0.0000658083,0.00067231327,0.00019451998,0.00013235275,0.993729,0.0047013406,0.0000041329263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00146371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082093553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059523275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018475157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010300104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013404787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233742189","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/7uc2b","title":"Vision, Knowledge, and Assertion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Attribution; Perception; Psychology; Object (grammar); Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10449003541209659,"score_gpt":0.32833523298365913,"score_spread":0.22384519757156254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233742189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88597614,0.0011702018,0.027757023,0.0034625144,0.00015600516,0.00007405247,0.00008863385,0.0001143643,0.08120096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99589276,0.00011912057,0.0028778506,0.00025801078,0.000019541101,0.000021043543,0.00003167167,0.000013038039,0.0007669421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946944,0.0022249115,0.00029139072,0.001183095,0.0013094906,0.00029679888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95181865,0.037061952,0.004507084,0.00460247,0.0011618204,0.00084812567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004999724,0.00032089092,0.00043852982,0.00057784055,0.0010016604,0.0030908317,0.0010179398,0.0018642951,0.00642955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04303159,0.00035770392,0.0004770872,0.0003883664,0.005800241,0.007248541,0.002700597,0.0024226832,0.00036966312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003385671,0.002578101,0.07086536,0.0021185433,0.00042271073,0.0011354228,0.049668897,0.0044521824,0.09393179,0.5182743,0.0028496466,0.2503174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041620518,0.001889378,0.108365335,0.00047955208,0.00037901895,0.0013935631,0.010505984,0.01176317,0.032909945,0.8155026,0.0160606,0.00033462216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013837834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008640009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00642955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008670998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057724054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026441395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233965954","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/zd9y7","title":"Knowledge and Assertion in \"Gettier\" Cases","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Assertion; Epistemology; Norm (philosophy); Cognition; Process (computing); Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1927301818297894,"score_gpt":0.3326239336127368,"score_spread":0.13989375178294738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233965954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7208835,0.0005578234,0.04183207,0.008663001,0.0002550054,0.0003054286,0.00018041438,0.00018410245,0.22713877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909757,0.00013856457,0.0064644804,0.00042318876,0.000030975396,0.000103642786,0.000064467335,0.000036206486,0.0017627736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97130054,0.018760446,0.0017882257,0.002093467,0.00462418,0.001433115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90323764,0.079076774,0.004011438,0.0101209385,0.0025432038,0.0010101345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014881218,0.0005403421,0.00085934147,0.0015827195,0.0053478396,0.005361628,0.0015220621,0.0052542263,0.011427397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07979159,0.00054462557,0.0008906098,0.0016672497,0.017833121,0.015765771,0.0075534442,0.0041716746,0.00065746123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000459814,0.00022056354,0.007468709,0.00024831758,0.000042792784,0.0029649811,0.06459294,0.00092259934,0.0026211021,0.8969519,0.002468685,0.021037512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022904713,0.0002245983,0.008815155,0.0003955089,0.00014598106,0.0043781083,0.053580634,0.011376398,0.0075142533,0.8646009,0.048600655,0.00013863744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002523183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020433431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014881218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017487395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008154802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07870036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234313437","doi":"10.1177/095647480001100214","title":"Book Review: “I Need Thinkers – not Reporters”","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journalism Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.04196776680039939,"score_gpt":0.27933155915965224,"score_spread":0.23736379235925287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234313437","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016800247,0.29003707,0.0005582399,0.3970698,0.28390852,0.000096578486,0.0003466666,0.0001586401,0.027656496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034462959,0.211653,0.00096463505,0.375569,0.20688309,0.00031220008,0.00067626295,0.00034810405,0.20014744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927891,0.0019170454,0.0005628358,0.0005759457,0.0038362762,0.00031876552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95475084,0.020535849,0.002667285,0.0011409224,0.018531691,0.0023734502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065244706,0.0007996941,0.002470165,0.0048701526,0.0017046438,0.0073726405,0.0027192985,0.007845151,0.036809344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0332602,0.000802144,0.00075769896,0.0066840914,0.0036097786,0.007342851,0.001616079,0.009124585,0.03151453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044631365,0.0000019222973,0.000009327373,0.00024067084,0.000002719019,0.0000056650906,0.000013183052,0.0000048074,0.000018667442,0.0006326538,0.99334234,0.005723613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010041064,0.0000056882836,0.00010785746,0.00072918367,0.00000924758,0.000032140935,0.000045482127,0.000011395815,0.0000211266,0.00095657306,0.9980648,0.000006379124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075781913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019767143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036809344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051476755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010847518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12313956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235941408","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/cbxh3","title":"The Radicalism of Truth-insensitive Epistemology: Truth's Profound Effect on the Evaluation of Belief","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Embodied cognition; Rationality; Proposition; Skepticism; Psychology","score_opus":0.1720948845666625,"score_gpt":0.33948506361326125,"score_spread":0.16739017904659875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235941408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1297178,0.01078688,0.33322966,0.12900026,0.0019188016,0.00009981561,0.00033640946,0.00065168703,0.3942587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713623,0.001357226,0.019341705,0.0028188068,0.0008805643,0.000074115414,0.000036020658,0.00022290686,0.0039064153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809091,0.010904181,0.00060597475,0.0019533364,0.0048440434,0.00078330014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9166267,0.06792328,0.0027560336,0.008036643,0.0036570427,0.0010002705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02421944,0.00073086406,0.0013396804,0.0023172596,0.0034299267,0.010014119,0.0020563772,0.004331208,0.005316132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0754228,0.0007809596,0.0012017648,0.001211037,0.05413857,0.02189314,0.008468639,0.012543072,0.0005934341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002812927,0.0000074893333,0.00014719258,0.000035465564,0.000012408085,0.000029035533,0.0008473717,0.00027186284,0.00018724512,0.99391973,0.00060910155,0.0039050665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011202189,0.000007311626,0.00009007751,0.000015632611,0.0000054994134,0.000023030423,0.00007965909,0.00038097467,0.00018033816,0.9977265,0.0014720801,0.000007693331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013283613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000584497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02421944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037228651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017808591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12808615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237462899","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12064","title":"Unreliable Knowledge","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Successor cardinal; Inference; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.439834482939109,"score_gpt":0.39175419009185797,"score_spread":0.048080292847251016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237462899","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06338633,0.00927237,0.48045292,0.068248756,0.0012993077,0.00020690156,0.0008086704,0.0006447876,0.37567994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96058345,0.0026728178,0.02241585,0.0029925175,0.00073687255,0.00014172989,0.00030686587,0.00013965904,0.0100101335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836447,0.00751607,0.0008875406,0.0024880203,0.0046498035,0.0008138516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92508143,0.045411315,0.0045367195,0.01662705,0.0071480856,0.0011952772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014350561,0.0007313566,0.0010248862,0.003491259,0.0024197567,0.008978387,0.0031641105,0.0041687237,0.013423492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057110824,0.000765549,0.0009206916,0.0019850545,0.03113661,0.016342482,0.0072497963,0.0054825027,0.0019589216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029047302,0.000011900645,0.00072617986,0.00020716758,0.000038594622,0.00024496476,0.0014688618,0.0018200625,0.00018030232,0.98332524,0.002427096,0.00952052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075346575,0.000008820693,0.00016769677,0.00017157327,0.000013372037,0.0001121002,0.00031811482,0.0017002447,0.0003052461,0.9832397,0.013942052,0.000013603435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018569106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008285046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014350561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036535314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029900442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07589394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237654671","doi":"10.1093/analys/63.3.173","title":"Solidity and impediment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Solidity; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05338023569034206,"score_gpt":0.26365561498305456,"score_spread":0.2102753792927125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237654671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07127807,0.007395967,0.011092954,0.038411945,0.0008313387,0.00006876109,0.00013273249,0.0000879748,0.8707003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611498,0.0029773181,0.0013367161,0.0014316301,0.00033546297,0.00006342145,0.000071089096,0.00007665189,0.032557953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99179274,0.0036301848,0.00043518638,0.0008296514,0.0024051515,0.00090698124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833772,0.008991496,0.0019946077,0.0022538884,0.0019401015,0.0014425848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004228426,0.00054181507,0.0005163309,0.0023927141,0.005484531,0.013480034,0.001117552,0.0023701412,0.026240895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02544884,0.00033080616,0.00046877045,0.0031009407,0.03400153,0.014365178,0.013133633,0.003931501,0.0021556334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021220278,0.000015414262,0.000700803,0.00008230797,0.000008304751,0.000074243755,0.007578051,0.00013369587,0.00007776644,0.9800618,0.0040872977,0.007159126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018895358,0.000040046245,0.0023132553,0.00055433204,0.000022780634,0.0002998074,0.021572486,0.00034108653,0.00026179312,0.74836594,0.22618471,0.000024818917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031480317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002055702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026240895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004305479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004902741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08778453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239093844","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_3444","title":"Reference Reconciliation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Encyclopedia of Database Systems","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.0819483191719738,"score_gpt":0.26316955859619057,"score_spread":0.18122123942421675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239093844","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009887849,0.006289773,0.6037161,0.008515152,0.003737196,0.00091305654,0.0039067944,0.018047392,0.3449867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1796779,0.0050538206,0.49888965,0.004077418,0.0015264282,0.00076005724,0.020949172,0.010187206,0.2788783],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98076653,0.005888331,0.0019225477,0.0036886067,0.006741419,0.0009924925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700926,0.0030654883,0.0007546896,0.01687729,0.008864399,0.0003455344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009994383,0.0015844022,0.0017781259,0.011688338,0.0043447264,0.012066631,0.0069369036,0.003554402,0.076984465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039012667,0.00086493045,0.0019066618,0.009212329,0.0031142298,0.015362341,0.014918671,0.003003138,0.03575909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121642006,0.00006786765,0.00067525904,0.00044681938,0.00006625783,0.00029102,0.0021000972,0.0012377524,0.0017754536,0.37524548,0.11180424,0.5061682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027702989,0.000038057773,0.0003712669,0.00039923194,0.00006870229,0.0005169553,0.0008342587,0.003550858,0.0059077255,0.12610173,0.8621294,0.00005415645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032918733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034513762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076984465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027459136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005118226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25753868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239116814","doi":"10.1002/9781118748213.index","title":"Index","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Citation index; Sociology; Library science; Citation; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1306499535056179,"score_gpt":0.30818072469660085,"score_spread":0.17753077119098296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239116814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000181347,0.00042028044,0.0008825808,0.001998719,0.0021576616,0.00015967549,0.005881182,0.0006917395,0.98762685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011029607,0.00044822763,0.0006093314,0.00063395133,0.0004592265,0.00013860069,0.0030426097,0.0003894971,0.99317557],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902916,0.000115860435,0.000060674203,0.00013709336,0.0005646245,0.000092619244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971077,0.0004546927,0.00010205341,0.0004117627,0.0013817752,0.00054197916],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093593623,0.00078329846,0.0008821208,0.0047045997,0.0027610392,0.008217901,0.0017976031,0.0018706769,0.84329486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007519287,0.00038482915,0.00050751463,0.0050667846,0.0007396142,0.0059846803,0.003065424,0.0018827146,0.720063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009198072,0.00001558173,0.00007694484,0.000086911896,9.861677e-7,0.000016613294,0.00005843966,0.000028275264,0.000058107664,0.0105484035,0.93051887,0.058581565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018601969,0.000002916298,0.00013287751,0.00005560865,3.9414428e-7,0.000014240451,0.00006107439,0.000020478283,0.000027016824,0.0016458231,0.9980354,0.0000023216564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006053231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00865033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15670514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002799662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002947666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239331224","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2128","title":"Self-Perceived Burden to Others","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0520120408551226,"score_gpt":0.2480768425581832,"score_spread":0.19606480170306062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239331224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42155135,0.0019504961,0.0093531,0.008153022,0.0003284888,0.0000471326,0.00019257306,0.00004682159,0.55837697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893968,0.00035250463,0.00055909605,0.00026308282,0.000058087793,0.000014513489,0.00005742244,0.00002017548,0.00927839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967559,0.0015297236,0.00012563706,0.00019925924,0.0011156589,0.00027390284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99160355,0.0028768962,0.0015985181,0.0008582958,0.0016836235,0.0013791223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031175562,0.00033425025,0.0002419337,0.0014614591,0.0018339125,0.0051855664,0.0004559861,0.00084965804,0.011665577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012652505,0.0001405506,0.00028881757,0.00072503096,0.0047421334,0.0042148517,0.0033354184,0.0017183634,0.0010877848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028002565,0.00048682519,0.08880884,0.00031635148,0.00018917784,0.00068672607,0.2230983,0.00092896534,0.0023175303,0.5554369,0.017801994,0.10964847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068817564,0.00037512553,0.21577567,0.0014469808,0.00018872088,0.0025616412,0.23935585,0.0031715084,0.0023200773,0.34161457,0.19295895,0.00016226208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011852013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011157198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011665577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001402029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008788502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039025247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239598162","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00104.x","title":"Epistemic Intuitions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sketch; Relevance (law); Philosophy; Formal epistemology; Epistemic virtue; Psychology; Social epistemology; Computer science; Algorithm; Political science","score_opus":0.10793054532606942,"score_gpt":0.29289884825377277,"score_spread":0.18496830292770333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239598162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034811586,0.0025107935,0.38011506,0.025024187,0.0011186536,0.0002196169,0.0005730401,0.00043270065,0.5551944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92838734,0.0011485505,0.055990625,0.0029002822,0.0007202329,0.00021064574,0.00024662635,0.00009423041,0.0103014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98171705,0.008997483,0.0014705383,0.0021669508,0.004695152,0.00095280795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731592,0.015895378,0.0019193401,0.0035066032,0.0047532856,0.0007661544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015545918,0.0009765015,0.0008862,0.0031441553,0.0034535318,0.008752273,0.0017915572,0.0038536955,0.010857068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04169194,0.00066427287,0.0014625124,0.0013355961,0.022742512,0.014469317,0.005919068,0.0042107627,0.0015996151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008673208,0.000007276216,0.00009153995,0.000043891745,0.000009831997,0.000025888725,0.0004902597,0.00047583174,0.00004997173,0.99539363,0.0011699228,0.0022332773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006492373,0.0000052294154,0.000094460636,0.000046700614,0.0000062251397,0.00003178888,0.0001386071,0.00093668443,0.000064242144,0.99236465,0.0062953224,0.000009652965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016625143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011395187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015545918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034431855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021640419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08221567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240045488","doi":"10.1215/00318108-3683702","title":"Book reviews","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Presupposition; Contextualism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Extant taxon; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.16457040432500217,"score_gpt":0.32653637707859307,"score_spread":0.1619659727535909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240045488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005202023,0.048867315,0.0017214275,0.012801106,0.017590456,0.00013386758,0.0039906483,0.00091110106,0.91346383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032740834,0.025952755,0.0012703314,0.005888392,0.0039703916,0.000093242335,0.0038221646,0.0006140953,0.9551145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854064,0.00017916311,0.000093100476,0.0003575841,0.0006928726,0.00013666209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828255,0.00032961124,0.00009991966,0.00026846136,0.0006829169,0.00033652195],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007608982,0.00106364,0.0012653297,0.0024692311,0.0015222273,0.008171415,0.0026521059,0.003188064,0.62654483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042130905,0.00049560325,0.00083757984,0.0036518688,0.0010383031,0.0051447167,0.0031100933,0.0028004225,0.56857574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026003312,0.000027643504,0.000119145945,0.0005723212,0.000007739141,0.000119196404,0.0001275248,0.000072431816,0.00022775655,0.0141415065,0.85031796,0.13424076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021617336,0.0000037208558,0.00007261398,0.00013541181,0.0000016321933,0.00006957512,0.00003589083,0.000009318294,0.000023520166,0.0012163994,0.9984273,0.0000024871697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003162649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045634704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62654483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022010521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037884815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53268844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241581630","doi":"10.1023/a:1015823716891","title":"Collective Responsibility","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Ethics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Virtue; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Moral responsibility; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.26137485680682826,"score_gpt":0.3316648048393938,"score_spread":0.07028994803256555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241581630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005027382,0.003215437,0.03308618,0.03042088,0.0011149715,0.000096495714,0.00010725106,0.00012876229,0.9268027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5366352,0.0028971415,0.014978638,0.009160066,0.0013951272,0.00033252386,0.00022959348,0.00020147851,0.43417022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99576217,0.0016973969,0.00017666191,0.000873376,0.0011290323,0.00036148142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545884,0.0014076028,0.00030257582,0.0012226854,0.0011249708,0.00048327967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004926707,0.0005948078,0.000566061,0.0012361312,0.0043384377,0.008421864,0.0012103503,0.004544966,0.032968648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009392692,0.0003686726,0.0005866575,0.0009135968,0.009937924,0.005621625,0.0033873757,0.004250351,0.005460383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055383175,0.00001441776,0.00015452776,0.000020477039,0.0000058499477,0.00001808092,0.00074403227,0.00014001378,0.000056691122,0.97913617,0.012436979,0.0072671743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010360168,0.000015655474,0.0004137312,0.0001276952,0.000009618805,0.00007090038,0.0007294139,0.00038844184,0.00018934628,0.7186104,0.27942234,0.000012051322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036523321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004247635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032968648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039821337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059176604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110291064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241757869","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1683066","title":"Gender and Philosophical Intuition","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03920508153699433,"score_gpt":0.26340784581029064,"score_spread":0.22420276427329633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241757869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060490247,0.0036268204,0.044263504,0.046211455,0.0010678412,0.000053767784,0.00018204279,0.00011261396,0.8439917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722964,0.0006837518,0.0062035657,0.003302193,0.0003845957,0.000052801155,0.00007660048,0.00007561584,0.016924465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959726,0.00222996,0.00015615708,0.0006892398,0.0006038174,0.00034817363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954609,0.002608836,0.000278897,0.00077451376,0.00061422,0.00026262185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060936357,0.0005047659,0.00070686755,0.0019201146,0.0032885687,0.006352858,0.0011139357,0.003522118,0.012600661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013038727,0.00035547148,0.00083109486,0.0007673768,0.024830807,0.010104356,0.0033209804,0.0043625436,0.0011990275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008686527,0.0000053954295,0.0000989919,0.0000106427115,0.0000029000146,0.000013786648,0.0009137411,0.000055678054,0.000035582714,0.997218,0.0007068926,0.00092976814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066654256,0.0000043804907,0.00012798033,0.00001580903,0.0000023287253,0.000023547816,0.00048168816,0.00013415856,0.00003435653,0.99418867,0.004976651,0.00000375279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020480119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014454721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012600661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025163526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016035776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042153418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242272019","doi":"10.3138/9781487535933","title":"Necessary but Not Sufficient","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ontario Arts Council; Canada Council for the Arts; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.061767756935356445,"score_gpt":0.21888571075564905,"score_spread":0.15711795382029262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242272019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033951667,0.012971529,0.0068201385,0.030892538,0.00087810983,0.00002621833,0.00046029766,0.00008600292,0.9444701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5735286,0.016490487,0.01290838,0.010102871,0.0015586175,0.00020048315,0.000975142,0.0003351057,0.38390037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997757,0.0006912644,0.0001015558,0.00058574264,0.000543693,0.00032075995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612844,0.0016654469,0.00019800798,0.0007887342,0.00091040164,0.0003089202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002721508,0.00058958516,0.0011317364,0.0011936659,0.0054279524,0.00855243,0.0007773553,0.002876961,0.0435774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055629434,0.00083010324,0.00048642204,0.0013546803,0.019018436,0.009360138,0.0029731703,0.004447894,0.0057735746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072538055,0.0000048406923,0.0000692948,0.000040285264,0.0000032533542,0.000021135977,0.00048569046,0.00003644065,0.00005031659,0.97951996,0.01610759,0.0036540073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013382997,0.0000064721007,0.0003164256,0.00015906358,0.000010858988,0.00007668945,0.00088766444,0.00012122531,0.00012633298,0.7020033,0.29626766,0.000011053896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035892762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06293043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0435774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007475884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009645096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14578092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242909947","doi":"10.1093/analys/anz012","title":"Explaining Knowledge","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Philosophy; Epistemology; Foley; Art history; Classics; History; Law","score_opus":0.05527764643097315,"score_gpt":0.28380846024099105,"score_spread":0.22853081381001789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242909947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004509887,0.0071529564,0.046517536,0.069245465,0.0015172319,0.000059806625,0.0004563618,0.00035178076,0.870189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68604857,0.0113928225,0.023509802,0.015854111,0.0021908311,0.00033238233,0.0015792949,0.0005642164,0.258528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970921,0.0015076445,0.00010141296,0.00059690565,0.00040430718,0.00029767753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972057,0.0014303988,0.0001638015,0.0008087651,0.0002589096,0.00013241476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032878157,0.00075295445,0.0004512719,0.0019183826,0.0027698893,0.008715515,0.0017552184,0.0042519514,0.045687098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008048835,0.0003669614,0.0007612217,0.0016815123,0.017526817,0.014903171,0.0059761847,0.003503657,0.007603825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003306312,0.0000032113946,0.00009374649,0.000031011965,0.000004223582,0.000035099827,0.0012950132,0.00012360208,0.000020555719,0.982501,0.00983873,0.0060505765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004510413,0.0000037432526,0.00011460827,0.0001386066,0.000004475953,0.000056940586,0.0010900164,0.00036253873,0.00009758146,0.780535,0.2175858,0.0000061448764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005093865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033063346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045687098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053180843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033534216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15283859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243106686","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5328","title":"From the Editors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07177379185878373,"score_gpt":0.2706586713046958,"score_spread":0.19888487944591204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243106686","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012953616,0.009978108,0.00045749484,0.08037916,0.87453026,0.00004117544,0.00027296884,0.00020769167,0.034003563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002064497,0.010769539,0.0005189702,0.068198174,0.5868723,0.000096430085,0.000445861,0.0004385753,0.3305957],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965869,0.0005340434,0.00032188717,0.0006518891,0.0015949691,0.00031036642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98471504,0.0033923048,0.000823657,0.0011173189,0.006702859,0.0032488932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032777633,0.0016330602,0.001301504,0.002861402,0.0028369252,0.010512105,0.0026033265,0.005388793,0.2044066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02274524,0.0006073349,0.0008706926,0.0018904454,0.0018522596,0.0059892596,0.0039754594,0.0075153173,0.14915758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013116381,0.00000712224,0.000033247146,0.000090703994,0.000002455725,0.000022088985,0.000019111194,0.000012850646,0.00006222721,0.0010422841,0.9869152,0.011779709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036722645,0.0000055557307,0.00006261587,0.0000993081,0.0000019949312,0.00003153906,0.000024721767,0.000015273648,0.00003263273,0.0005708478,0.99914765,0.0000039955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009115057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024548746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2044066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002514064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002762774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6838082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243834848","doi":"10.32920/14636133","title":"Truth, Superassertability, and Conceivability","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Epistemology; Statement (logic); Argument (complex analysis); Wright; Philosophy; Legitimacy; Coherence theory of truth; Pragmatic theory of truth; Computer science; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.10081561519758016,"score_gpt":0.29297838797343123,"score_spread":0.1921627727758511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243834848","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15671322,0.009635283,0.3716669,0.040752,0.0005671225,0.00010511301,0.00036679074,0.000368655,0.41982487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982018,0.0010652208,0.011977577,0.00058614276,0.0002588778,0.000062744744,0.000091385664,0.000057779198,0.0038822913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571013,0.0021056205,0.00021268589,0.0007357111,0.0008904618,0.00034533357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895042,0.007017481,0.00082602823,0.001619024,0.0006882813,0.0003449074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066443756,0.0004474873,0.0007283749,0.0019285777,0.0023381193,0.0064149164,0.0014378985,0.0026693018,0.007878361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014130264,0.00044453205,0.0008833072,0.0015029924,0.03241096,0.014427212,0.005348512,0.0062669287,0.0007021139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049266932,0.0000039001757,0.00012397635,0.000014030935,0.0000023641799,0.000025263897,0.000573534,0.00008606185,0.000047174424,0.99743587,0.00017347427,0.0015094763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031175318,0.000002808409,0.00006990449,0.0000119287215,0.000001819238,0.000030508098,0.00015522736,0.00021009975,0.00005782434,0.99766797,0.0017859209,0.000002701825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012741048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070770405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007878361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025703572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012583247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035139263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243881088","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/yev3s","title":"Is Knowledge Justified True Belief?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Point (geometry); Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2515479990223647,"score_gpt":0.3381484366118795,"score_spread":0.0866004375895148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243881088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05439406,0.014891994,0.09861503,0.3190233,0.0025999302,0.00012092567,0.00043959092,0.00018221006,0.50973296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97023016,0.003576811,0.0071926382,0.010705365,0.0018841746,0.00010523052,0.00017003335,0.00006957244,0.0060659386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98577195,0.006485914,0.0007133886,0.0024743606,0.0033681674,0.0011861881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9629589,0.02515047,0.002744487,0.004467537,0.0039689788,0.00070970814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013677721,0.00035978208,0.0011969564,0.0020453697,0.0031901759,0.008567042,0.0015102503,0.008258649,0.009582896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051641613,0.00044008324,0.00082995335,0.0019560643,0.043281827,0.021732073,0.0035666977,0.005125956,0.0020725213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001239596,0.0000058686187,0.00021283636,0.000061905244,0.000011719348,0.00007339354,0.0008900272,0.00007450226,0.000034450204,0.9933159,0.001640394,0.0036665723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008917164,0.000004812335,0.00017762632,0.000089193636,0.000007707653,0.00007482174,0.0005364316,0.00027656934,0.000080041464,0.98739016,0.011346618,0.0000070298743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030658538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014700791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013677721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004016564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034565642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07233554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243934947","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/ysqnj","title":"Understanding and the Norm of Explanation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Assertion; Introspection; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4511930415737336,"score_gpt":0.2960137743835239,"score_spread":0.1551792671902097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243934947","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11456325,0.005907747,0.4020808,0.085802466,0.0013721149,0.00008694316,0.00028930712,0.00035503824,0.3895423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97357255,0.0007906246,0.017027808,0.0022806106,0.0006142191,0.00011393683,0.00011159507,0.00008404388,0.005404474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773885,0.0134714525,0.0011863107,0.0027819565,0.004155166,0.0010165611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95275396,0.029593222,0.0043673464,0.0072852033,0.004958747,0.0010414995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016931865,0.0003338394,0.00079004094,0.0014876336,0.0024345547,0.0066902614,0.0014159839,0.0037502581,0.005141357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041398074,0.00032247647,0.00079859147,0.00090249913,0.02121413,0.015677733,0.005310752,0.004439728,0.000736244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016313488,0.000006386882,0.00039317552,0.000025805866,0.0000059159033,0.000019647257,0.00051712315,0.00021532542,0.00007558272,0.99443215,0.00045350438,0.0038389808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007887416,0.000009188501,0.00024490652,0.00003270797,0.0000050509802,0.000033773595,0.00020571085,0.0007961361,0.00015473174,0.99104005,0.007461983,0.000007800121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014309803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081119273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016931865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028787109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029380778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08954531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245134956","doi":"10.1111/papq.12299","title":"Unacknowledged Permissivism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Proposition; Epistemology; Permissive; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09859490224146784,"score_gpt":0.26310399378009874,"score_spread":0.1645090915386309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245134956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083617665,0.005020896,0.34930193,0.091450065,0.002494682,0.00036648402,0.0005559163,0.00043684768,0.46675548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661401,0.0009003529,0.020889452,0.0049946224,0.0009330858,0.00022238017,0.00011872691,0.00008905753,0.0057120835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9584621,0.018627966,0.003571105,0.008585218,0.008998431,0.001755117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92357963,0.04112359,0.006995026,0.01861224,0.008400991,0.0012884479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03184502,0.0008471608,0.0012544187,0.0029296207,0.0046109334,0.01019754,0.004739418,0.009247636,0.0083067035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08784476,0.0010765526,0.0012914342,0.0019062336,0.050446704,0.024423653,0.010669625,0.012084988,0.0014054023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022660732,0.000010207351,0.00026824386,0.000059892755,0.000023561186,0.00013497529,0.0009403319,0.00024703346,0.00013029958,0.9943709,0.00065655576,0.0031353035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009793543,0.000009414434,0.00007262727,0.00008977085,0.000012311004,0.000110259665,0.00022295742,0.00045763425,0.00039353478,0.99165654,0.006951872,0.0000132106015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010586708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007007833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03184502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00403042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004908747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1684146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245195506","doi":"10.1111/1467-9973.00287","title":"Oracularity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Falsifiability; Judgement; Argument (complex analysis); Metaphysics; Credibility; Philosophy; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.1064484508213111,"score_gpt":0.2662004836574623,"score_spread":0.1597520328361512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245195506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06805413,0.003577011,0.04444365,0.11628034,0.0034863574,0.0000808962,0.00016251636,0.00034403105,0.7635711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637429,0.00072593987,0.0033061511,0.009875824,0.0007581642,0.000060789796,0.00006919846,0.00011872452,0.021342382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98864657,0.0055086897,0.0005985787,0.0019649789,0.002435174,0.00084601325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773393,0.008783307,0.003186152,0.0030167853,0.0068911323,0.0007833935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013427679,0.0004623946,0.0004724235,0.0011022971,0.0065118326,0.008110745,0.0015851664,0.0037963705,0.011401499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02147745,0.0002530864,0.0003706183,0.0014129773,0.029284824,0.009511751,0.005696873,0.0062947082,0.00185867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018134408,0.0000075128664,0.0003089237,0.00006457755,0.000006464345,0.00005674041,0.0108882915,0.000044524128,0.00016359505,0.9774039,0.005963785,0.005073621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019038107,0.000056076944,0.0013844186,0.0006733011,0.000052708863,0.000299886,0.020965712,0.001055765,0.0012432456,0.5787359,0.3954657,0.00004817714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050634877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004156986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013427679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034068336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004750177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07101315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245343541","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/e368c","title":"Contingent A Priori Knowledge","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20774104811930547,"score_gpt":0.3247151762239398,"score_spread":0.11697412810463434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245343541","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012589524,0.0037088194,0.5636409,0.027114414,0.0011868522,0.00013035139,0.00055074506,0.00025159313,0.39082688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7862063,0.004708771,0.1551083,0.0078058047,0.0024960157,0.000595582,0.0007551737,0.00023857053,0.042085543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912832,0.0033761896,0.00043626604,0.0022005276,0.002190278,0.0005135002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783159,0.01292281,0.0012184628,0.004676584,0.002081228,0.00078489457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009854159,0.00095199625,0.0010601347,0.002592942,0.0031444752,0.0069069252,0.002781126,0.004143313,0.017747143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025105817,0.00096315815,0.0018763213,0.0014084412,0.017713154,0.016931795,0.0067994767,0.007966418,0.0033817384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005827139,0.0000058352302,0.000056569592,0.000025361955,0.0000067087103,0.00003467382,0.00015641934,0.00020471537,0.00005651599,0.99710494,0.0007232867,0.0016190397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034923607,0.000004044157,0.00006766752,0.000049186554,0.0000075502717,0.000047129877,0.000051812072,0.0007941655,0.00015158647,0.98826224,0.010554434,0.0000067494175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016186198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001527221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017747143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003661316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028859028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0593701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246667039","doi":"10.1002/9781118785317.weom020040","title":"Reflective Equilibrium","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Wiley Encyclopedia of Management","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflective equilibrium; Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03897551974540666,"score_gpt":0.274034554507316,"score_spread":0.23505903476190934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246667039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008254289,0.0011776289,0.38614717,0.012214868,0.0006846603,0.0004364784,0.0002681304,0.00042330768,0.5903935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.695972,0.0019269777,0.16702192,0.0040803375,0.0007981659,0.0011811752,0.00046161842,0.0006673093,0.12789048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9763326,0.012391031,0.0012903631,0.0036312498,0.0048981733,0.0014564766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762008,0.010922955,0.0016587238,0.0056258067,0.004500231,0.0010914593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015471236,0.0014911189,0.0013609792,0.0025942074,0.003862927,0.010981104,0.0036730939,0.0044104294,0.046134897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048226845,0.0006602127,0.0017698794,0.0021237663,0.010632353,0.010337339,0.008046163,0.004235433,0.008479095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015292982,0.000022434233,0.00011679518,0.0000595007,0.000016818658,0.00003597584,0.00030210437,0.0010581907,0.000087160355,0.98907125,0.0024533838,0.0067611467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018285422,0.000013569185,0.0000573747,0.00007469703,0.00001071247,0.000041706087,0.00015545958,0.002772473,0.00022944824,0.9745035,0.022110697,0.0000119463275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021807502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017284802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046134897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006181807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007228102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15433657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246804678","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_101380","title":"Trust","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.10173698126920636,"score_gpt":0.25791559195364,"score_spread":0.15617861068443364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246804678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012139259,0.00067048625,0.0097071985,0.008165586,0.00052513863,0.00007929315,0.00026939716,0.00019341207,0.97917545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13507958,0.001717713,0.0036645646,0.005054929,0.000645194,0.00019424444,0.0005949182,0.0003908328,0.8526579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99458283,0.0014984988,0.000312892,0.0012156311,0.0017241308,0.00066605274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909924,0.00216658,0.0006428186,0.002879644,0.002546278,0.0007722505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032728114,0.0006164535,0.00063373515,0.0014459381,0.0032173542,0.011279845,0.0016509655,0.0036399465,0.20218678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020602627,0.0005192749,0.0005220835,0.0014962308,0.0045901258,0.012802886,0.0049603074,0.003900619,0.0869317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019242265,0.0000116114625,0.00018228247,0.000062314975,0.000009600515,0.000081368904,0.0007336078,0.00012813987,0.00012806035,0.9032662,0.0687898,0.026587727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009739505,0.000012620996,0.0002288939,0.00015856893,0.000009236713,0.00017138376,0.00044263745,0.000288019,0.00022064193,0.21988815,0.77855486,0.000015236668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006025723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005168175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20218678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047694338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059999917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247010926","doi":"10.32920/14753850.v1","title":"Externalism, Memory, and Self-Knowledge","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Externalism; Doctrine; Epistemology; Individuation; Subject (documents); Inclusion (mineral); A priori and a posteriori; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Self-knowledge; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Mathematics; Computer science; Theology","score_opus":0.07167107920821292,"score_gpt":0.290100854881818,"score_spread":0.2184297756736051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247010926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24649715,0.013917677,0.06031738,0.025866708,0.00029789793,0.000041847292,0.00016799288,0.0001499806,0.65274334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98905635,0.0012833101,0.0025601825,0.00042834508,0.0001456298,0.00002374029,0.000047328656,0.000022022215,0.006433205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882144,0.0005178413,0.000062529856,0.00023068665,0.00023370102,0.00013379389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664694,0.002009525,0.00035899287,0.0005428551,0.0002895205,0.00015202702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017799989,0.00027001306,0.00034821616,0.0013505747,0.0014554982,0.0059523275,0.00072908145,0.0014831235,0.0039825253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004887553,0.00015847279,0.00029311562,0.0012266284,0.02221007,0.008388973,0.003468557,0.0018838187,0.00033136707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013602274,0.000016459004,0.0005978905,0.000038315873,0.0000061521746,0.000048242648,0.0021236767,0.00016242487,0.00009261718,0.9887599,0.000458975,0.0076817246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044787935,0.000004852115,0.00045834275,0.000029878895,0.0000029648565,0.0000658083,0.00067231327,0.00019451998,0.00013235275,0.993729,0.0047013406,0.0000041329263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00146371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082093553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059523275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018475157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010300104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013404787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247478580","doi":"10.1111/phpe.12110","title":"SEMANTIC INDECISION","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Perspectives","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.10235160998711826,"score_gpt":0.3177550435448089,"score_spread":0.21540343355769062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247478580","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020799676,0.0064472207,0.58983266,0.0202396,0.0017634936,0.00015851807,0.0010806216,0.0008793925,0.35879877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77509004,0.0039372826,0.14619648,0.005279397,0.0023169112,0.00043519403,0.0032929573,0.0010022218,0.062449478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912328,0.0033456513,0.000628488,0.0027334758,0.0015957899,0.00046374917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99178386,0.0035387985,0.00032058614,0.0025871224,0.001543385,0.00022622662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056749913,0.0012901672,0.0016048003,0.0035444433,0.0049934536,0.0097987205,0.0027561423,0.0037498784,0.02221689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019241376,0.0011432546,0.0021662381,0.0029615094,0.012942694,0.030799873,0.008767826,0.0077564684,0.003489143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015996302,0.000007903699,0.00006206097,0.000037216185,0.000009966831,0.000031214044,0.00033960844,0.000159821,0.000075148586,0.99245924,0.0015647238,0.005237064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005231715,0.0000037039874,0.000038812883,0.000024864396,0.000008829627,0.000046562494,0.00015230359,0.0007876921,0.00020121183,0.9809193,0.01780674,0.000004726046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017452185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014635475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02221689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036952994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022370098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07432288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248019717","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/4zq8s","title":"Sustaining rules: a model and application","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Normative; Connection (principal bundle); Normative model of decision-making; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Rule of law; Rule-based system; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Mathematics; Law; Philosophy; Machine learning","score_opus":0.10513269572734638,"score_gpt":0.2962433106957255,"score_spread":0.19111061496837914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248019717","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024123762,0.003198412,0.6564012,0.022741865,0.00044984877,0.00021538395,0.0002839234,0.00047652313,0.29210913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73007184,0.0032271098,0.22408041,0.0025440764,0.00078712584,0.0007845763,0.00028320696,0.0003018186,0.037919912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971718,0.0010590918,0.00018970386,0.00062555575,0.000644371,0.00030946385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994356,0.0029590062,0.00057974353,0.00090152124,0.0007099482,0.0004938393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004097321,0.00068589125,0.00075770007,0.002470608,0.0031198438,0.00648292,0.003412959,0.006761721,0.009870005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011394008,0.00059267017,0.0014451962,0.0026870484,0.013655756,0.011396485,0.0044063297,0.0040263906,0.0021334167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034967204,0.000010160043,0.00012688838,0.000012022414,0.000003019938,0.00005183339,0.0002744113,0.0015200758,0.00005817839,0.9949313,0.0005243624,0.0024842722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005001739,0.0000067466412,0.000048419584,0.000023801505,0.0000033830293,0.00003454878,0.00011503506,0.005617386,0.00006881686,0.9857026,0.008367865,0.000006425239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006061454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037294624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009870005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003899854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034063596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03301841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248191072","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_394-1","title":"Slippery Slope","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Slippery slope; Bioethics; Argument (complex analysis); Abortion; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Environmental ethics; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Medicine; Law; Family medicine; Pregnancy; Internal medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.0769545466007768,"score_gpt":0.2407107466193551,"score_spread":0.1637562000185783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248191072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033202514,0.0056737512,0.010690625,0.045062363,0.0023914939,0.000041010342,0.00013145481,0.00015601417,0.9325331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.208417,0.0064920294,0.006766831,0.026256116,0.0019762965,0.0001846817,0.00021905743,0.0007971743,0.74889076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748576,0.000908081,0.00006486962,0.0005036612,0.00075738254,0.000280234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977464,0.0007036245,0.00008716758,0.0004951542,0.0007206677,0.00024689862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027593789,0.000683745,0.0007777517,0.0015537174,0.0067414,0.011220173,0.0011553233,0.0033858246,0.053627938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00945067,0.0004513827,0.00047082527,0.0010324342,0.017806992,0.014056646,0.0066448795,0.0096055325,0.014203879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010738758,0.0000074281274,0.00006505388,0.000022202914,0.0000029445614,0.000032528533,0.0016064907,0.00003820022,0.00003925794,0.9499567,0.03755965,0.0106588425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065336153,0.000008548546,0.0001400609,0.00025672777,0.0000034451082,0.0000644407,0.001960283,0.00014083805,0.00008408668,0.44803232,0.5492947,0.000007965796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062280707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009744792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053627938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039348183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043955445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1794033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248250607","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12654","title":"Evidential Preemption","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Preemption; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Epistemology; Psychology; Empirical evidence; Law and economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.6838566920612632,"score_gpt":0.4103988827310323,"score_spread":0.2734578093302309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248250607","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025453184,0.003267379,0.61128384,0.022436606,0.0011723692,0.00040547154,0.00020654903,0.0002696647,0.33550504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88169116,0.0012980854,0.090202704,0.005196181,0.0009867471,0.00043391314,0.00011702384,0.00014386492,0.019930318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793027,0.009285265,0.0016480522,0.00355701,0.005343951,0.00086298084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9463832,0.03306034,0.0036057883,0.010820832,0.0051301373,0.0009997055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022098439,0.00071795925,0.00084785855,0.0016822875,0.002937554,0.0053535323,0.0032023338,0.00579614,0.007707388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06391375,0.00094669504,0.0012258331,0.00081011513,0.022867221,0.012526427,0.007327771,0.011794415,0.001922158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010813944,0.000010017855,0.00009411249,0.00006111403,0.000009991216,0.0001500438,0.00087362697,0.0002247133,0.00033890078,0.9945838,0.00065083225,0.0029921054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013789629,0.000015632359,0.00009518883,0.000116892355,0.000012084232,0.0001902155,0.00012681601,0.0012037195,0.0007903252,0.97941464,0.018006764,0.00001388811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007367124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007088076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022098439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003462933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030409317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11686909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248282835","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/zf64s","title":"Reasons and Basing in Commonsense Epistemology: Evidence from Two Experiments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Relation (database); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.2507180676652423,"score_gpt":0.35802207498836974,"score_spread":0.10730400732312745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248282835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9526818,0.0010350338,0.010736061,0.0027256496,0.00018234001,0.00091112906,0.0003489485,0.00007923855,0.031299874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862075,0.00041444486,0.009327544,0.0010227562,0.00006470432,0.00096858654,0.0002881069,0.00006504962,0.0016413793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809154,0.012115765,0.001624528,0.0021821465,0.00257607,0.0005861048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5368325,0.4168287,0.015111572,0.023400724,0.005329774,0.0024966693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028680477,0.0008234866,0.0012417968,0.0009129899,0.0023979887,0.0039168564,0.0027340217,0.004607378,0.015972434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17908537,0.0011469317,0.0006947165,0.00082995766,0.008854207,0.011573685,0.0057879407,0.0042645214,0.0013623539],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.033153336,0.05995677,0.08355045,0.012888111,0.0018462274,0.003967908,0.22849454,0.008578786,0.05960029,0.26739565,0.016281763,0.2242861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017766733,0.015220392,0.16537008,0.0022967793,0.0012706405,0.004013225,0.0575654,0.02646427,0.039553773,0.5960831,0.073069006,0.0013266515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011920701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011815954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028680477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011369096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011574924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15167868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248358268","doi":"10.5558/tfc85341-3","title":"Of Relevance / Question d’information","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Computer science; Information retrieval; Political science","score_opus":0.02662145254103627,"score_gpt":0.2615677472097801,"score_spread":0.23494629466874384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248358268","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013600508,0.025179116,0.12984101,0.41581282,0.014759518,0.0003673575,0.001401896,0.00045586444,0.3985819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7713439,0.019340595,0.05564302,0.048403095,0.024326608,0.0007779545,0.0017031741,0.0006735242,0.07778807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93938714,0.036529917,0.0033435863,0.0052735107,0.013556909,0.0019089892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88997436,0.0803293,0.0025412834,0.015645616,0.010426159,0.0010833093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031493854,0.0013206035,0.002163594,0.0053362255,0.005138046,0.023733238,0.0028057282,0.01444513,0.022579972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13116841,0.0009116812,0.0019997756,0.0045608026,0.02495684,0.033036,0.0064948443,0.015934654,0.005061031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059408056,0.000017749244,0.00021409216,0.00025267949,0.000026527709,0.00017516907,0.0016452026,0.00022384986,0.00020323088,0.9668315,0.014330594,0.016019952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051755316,0.000017539642,0.00030440808,0.00043748567,0.000018857942,0.00056000374,0.0018733179,0.0011111957,0.00085994264,0.6607296,0.33399934,0.000036491383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007956543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035141706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031493854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011315019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009025264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16655743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248547016","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498879.003","title":"Cogency","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Persuasion; Epistemology; Philosophy; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.055576789089679945,"score_gpt":0.20531267081251975,"score_spread":0.1497358817228398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248547016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011123019,0.0020670372,0.10094052,0.013637237,0.0014899169,0.00046313304,0.00023826522,0.00031906497,0.86972183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8223923,0.0018173585,0.091043845,0.009533068,0.0020796799,0.0021176303,0.00049243163,0.0006421484,0.06988147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9780682,0.009289231,0.0017520147,0.004363539,0.005126682,0.0014003158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793199,0.01192807,0.0012420737,0.0035075087,0.003271837,0.0007306535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020086162,0.0012464236,0.0014643297,0.0047480157,0.00503901,0.011817853,0.0025189368,0.0065657888,0.017187508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03987314,0.0010801465,0.0019154185,0.0021204634,0.02692158,0.01465981,0.0096031185,0.007614901,0.005016952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017066675,0.000009181475,0.00014342056,0.00006555178,0.00001108144,0.000046647307,0.000725561,0.00007491605,0.00010467636,0.99270004,0.0017858597,0.004315984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027164548,0.000027230064,0.0002441927,0.00012366517,0.00002313559,0.0001697768,0.0004675299,0.0003558656,0.00037083263,0.93434143,0.06383555,0.000013614844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007223382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000704869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020086162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050834366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040162345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249581682","doi":"10.5558/tfc86299-3","title":"Of Relevance / Question d’Information","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Information retrieval; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.022516154748655162,"score_gpt":0.2569581286496641,"score_spread":0.23444197390100896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249581682","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013031302,0.025566952,0.120565124,0.42872533,0.015258919,0.00035132057,0.0013656999,0.00043626459,0.39469907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76870805,0.019944338,0.053153258,0.051675476,0.02596639,0.00076943,0.001663031,0.0006794555,0.07744053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9395106,0.0365769,0.0033217557,0.005250573,0.013444524,0.0018957116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88835883,0.08172746,0.002592771,0.015791973,0.010424272,0.0011047482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031554766,0.0013029663,0.0021485803,0.0052381977,0.0051556155,0.023883171,0.0028028642,0.01461749,0.022576192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13184951,0.0008951631,0.0019565532,0.004531305,0.025487801,0.032924872,0.0064966446,0.015966874,0.0050670896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005848591,0.000017360207,0.00021072074,0.00025472278,0.000026208156,0.00017054388,0.0016466909,0.00021682231,0.0001962027,0.966579,0.014788077,0.015835075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051002833,0.000017079914,0.0002960893,0.0004456321,0.000018371633,0.0005468816,0.0018663784,0.0010352747,0.0008094447,0.65325516,0.34162295,0.000035662873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007878447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003515044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031554766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011269559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009205529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1668796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250997771","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/97ycz","title":"Iffy Predictions and Proper Expectations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Successor cardinal; sort; Epistemology; Process (computing); Connection (principal bundle); Speech act; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1387050347070976,"score_gpt":0.28861274006475873,"score_spread":0.14990770535766113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250997771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1063727,0.0013620161,0.41400295,0.026927624,0.0005362431,0.00009866646,0.00039882635,0.00053555315,0.44976532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97236925,0.00026399034,0.017367166,0.0011461128,0.00026254318,0.00008328575,0.00014907334,0.00014392984,0.008214727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992023,0.003942173,0.00043349818,0.0015751983,0.0013704519,0.0006555554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915087,0.004270577,0.0008217022,0.001991911,0.0010593751,0.00034767517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007752077,0.0005258667,0.00057149027,0.0009234806,0.0020777637,0.0054488047,0.0010817637,0.002943715,0.0053234724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016728068,0.0005024773,0.00093459786,0.00056874234,0.01567579,0.011278647,0.0029654908,0.0035956725,0.0011407271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014859982,0.000006375803,0.00034776225,0.000012375762,0.0000052436867,0.0000333808,0.0005978134,0.00044832478,0.00010058407,0.9953738,0.0004692501,0.0025901913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006203946,0.0000058854807,0.00022697954,0.000015153233,0.0000039078723,0.000020322275,0.00015431244,0.0021362698,0.00021746958,0.99430674,0.0028997713,0.000006960944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023339763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012982362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007752077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025263147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002020122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040997386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251201465","doi":"10.2478/disp-2010-0001","title":"Epistemology neutralized","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disputatio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Counterintuitive; Skepticism; Epistemology; Normative; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Analytic philosophy; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Contemporary philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03984698466051083,"score_gpt":0.28098708453989657,"score_spread":0.24114009987938573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251201465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013658995,0.0013012651,0.056972627,0.044677507,0.003305149,0.00012657128,0.00017180253,0.00016528534,0.87962073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9194808,0.0007079854,0.0129661495,0.013762779,0.0017577807,0.00038775872,0.00014567531,0.00024046583,0.050550558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851865,0.0070025865,0.0004958254,0.0028110093,0.0034887723,0.0010152402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867225,0.0048322966,0.00067754055,0.0033176935,0.003880921,0.00056899147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009031219,0.0005001847,0.0008948083,0.0019163952,0.003823054,0.010185206,0.0020488824,0.0049540303,0.016287467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022066329,0.00037154814,0.0008434802,0.0008522674,0.029366123,0.00925543,0.009015942,0.010000911,0.002940719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007761057,0.000005300643,0.000030730433,0.000018425453,0.000004302042,0.000018958775,0.00036267028,0.000043766482,0.00006095248,0.99685955,0.0011864344,0.0014010275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013858387,0.0000070631213,0.000053768636,0.000069245565,0.0000074342342,0.000040374787,0.0003188387,0.00035688747,0.0002572049,0.95868427,0.0401841,0.000007016983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013056416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009705469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016287467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070094056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004543469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05448705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251883786","doi":"10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.52","title":"Masking Disagreement among Experts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Credibility; Masking (illustration); Position (finance); Focus (optics); Politics; Scientific consensus; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Business; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03783743041043254,"score_gpt":0.23319073510138663,"score_spread":0.19535330469095408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251883786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45290095,0.0019164552,0.33467007,0.08000552,0.003964394,0.0036408794,0.00090957625,0.0012378569,0.12075432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93602055,0.00023109243,0.048437305,0.007831188,0.0009847967,0.0016306903,0.00028032277,0.00015898814,0.004424993],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.59520984,0.30983955,0.020496184,0.019056732,0.04738023,0.008017367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2701379,0.57169384,0.047694515,0.060849823,0.045064144,0.0045597027],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.23741385,0.0012352372,0.0022684117,0.0055743186,0.0077776294,0.007701814,0.0037964084,0.008905739,0.010482595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.52542895,0.0012776837,0.0016238226,0.0028104738,0.00691073,0.00866322,0.016413921,0.00817839,0.002951288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0059899306,0.0006908845,0.06590355,0.0042156223,0.0013347586,0.002986268,0.22682402,0.006299733,0.04588221,0.19226667,0.041829,0.40577745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011646366,0.0013121375,0.035409153,0.0050626043,0.0012326343,0.0013400775,0.05721265,0.04574589,0.05393537,0.59444666,0.20238905,0.0007491343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014324111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010007385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23741385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047280886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007543999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9404045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252252122","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_100010","title":"Adversarial Knowledge","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1037802495597827,"score_gpt":0.273553490365412,"score_spread":0.16977324080562928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252252122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032363592,0.0025149242,0.075012706,0.013724102,0.00057752745,0.000054177057,0.0001578638,0.00008146827,0.904641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6072733,0.006012716,0.021382937,0.0053796005,0.0019089209,0.00030791137,0.00056014885,0.00018674423,0.35698783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967539,0.0013842059,0.000117940814,0.0005522419,0.0009350958,0.00025650032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951121,0.00285715,0.0002315689,0.0011714906,0.00047299918,0.0001546979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034782025,0.00076092145,0.0005745386,0.0013286973,0.002684489,0.006704921,0.0019013652,0.0033662096,0.031503033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012081545,0.00037853126,0.00054669136,0.00093119574,0.011954342,0.009119055,0.004115429,0.0054753576,0.0057009803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000180521,0.0000033422707,0.000019146037,0.000010556518,0.0000019930371,0.000012072938,0.00011379466,0.00020947435,0.000015510952,0.993916,0.002743825,0.0029525496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016318054,0.0000023692733,0.00003390794,0.00005705066,0.0000020674947,0.000028339415,0.00008051135,0.0005573217,0.00007067628,0.9567958,0.042366747,0.0000035822927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015633123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001502091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031503033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003584587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023400523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105388105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252625169","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3643920","title":"Irksome Assertion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.04889217102827129,"score_gpt":0.25109852115688347,"score_spread":0.20220635012861218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252625169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033846362,0.0026292678,0.0035980113,0.19314711,0.014033798,0.000038068734,0.00046036646,0.00019019851,0.7825186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15440455,0.002577357,0.004950359,0.17189012,0.015010733,0.00025788997,0.00042028836,0.00024496837,0.6502438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979322,0.00039066147,0.0000972143,0.00069884444,0.0006140946,0.0002670696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781185,0.0008293782,0.00013527997,0.0003420852,0.00073735334,0.00014412678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023758295,0.0005150764,0.00080310914,0.0014154689,0.0038767755,0.00612803,0.0018011059,0.0069562458,0.08198445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010433721,0.00032121965,0.0007368364,0.0007577636,0.006118674,0.0070274533,0.0038856706,0.0105521465,0.025663994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048955146,0.000025034478,0.00019459563,0.00005833088,0.000009880383,0.00012386993,0.00070370914,0.000036130736,0.00017010186,0.8347224,0.1555716,0.008335303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029272738,0.000012087413,0.00042451944,0.00016491226,0.000016181551,0.00020826099,0.0007239802,0.00020327642,0.00035871714,0.26871428,0.7291237,0.000020881414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028164913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028800073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08198445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021918141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001630662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27426535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252732268","doi":"10.1016/s1499-2671(14)00544-9","title":"Duality/Conflict of Interest","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Diabetes","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Duality (order theory); Pure mathematics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13694773711238684,"score_gpt":0.26708957414146517,"score_spread":0.13014183702907833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252732268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032205947,0.056859173,0.020656733,0.1960578,0.1358807,0.0047076307,0.01632392,0.00085777993,0.5364504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.561217,0.020248754,0.04633986,0.07740031,0.03446744,0.0064250026,0.01099605,0.00059499644,0.24231061],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98950535,0.002538237,0.001101783,0.0019336994,0.0037539045,0.0011670111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93871206,0.019686224,0.006046586,0.0055223955,0.017707912,0.012324881],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011232146,0.00079886924,0.004144354,0.0012448522,0.0016365633,0.0061128074,0.0032793153,0.006139006,0.11697189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081461824,0.0005510747,0.0009524457,0.001687402,0.0029477964,0.0017701472,0.0037288708,0.0040823524,0.02486573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026846298,0.0010226186,0.011136822,0.005665165,0.00041393965,0.009892098,0.0068033347,0.00046259936,0.002979554,0.3504994,0.3752069,0.23323293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005631154,0.00026512746,0.00391796,0.0066044373,0.00020686365,0.008025612,0.0035029552,0.0014551767,0.00081737235,0.02029446,0.9542643,0.00008269777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017043581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037844293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.993861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026535315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010576819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39130992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253128174","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12253","title":"Sensitivity Actually","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sensitivity (control systems); Lottery; Appeal; Epistemology; Modal; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6236328143476552,"score_gpt":0.41096779576559506,"score_spread":0.2126650185820601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253128174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013544387,0.0011415932,0.0759603,0.019973846,0.0010723436,0.00010818766,0.00031628783,0.00047251314,0.8874105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83765656,0.001071123,0.013915075,0.008775153,0.00063364446,0.00020903627,0.000424064,0.0006091061,0.13670619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938751,0.0021039248,0.00029601698,0.0018612155,0.0011702541,0.0006935768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99378186,0.0022852914,0.00040789953,0.0018744757,0.0013946191,0.0002559268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047240313,0.0008798326,0.00059273874,0.0012818548,0.004024947,0.006279015,0.0014651937,0.003211498,0.049393844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012646294,0.0005158527,0.00093299424,0.0009930643,0.015485193,0.013963246,0.007201686,0.005754656,0.008112571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011534428,0.000005389944,0.00017116267,0.000038644765,0.000007664974,0.00007425985,0.0021232113,0.00006368542,0.00016975164,0.98737013,0.0051946654,0.0047698305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010651767,0.000017314274,0.00035595565,0.000089361536,0.000022130958,0.00038916737,0.0017625856,0.00043238056,0.00056477933,0.7874428,0.20888908,0.000023707302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023949235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017286984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049393844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033525245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017611135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16523886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253941914","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9205.2006.00304.x","title":"Index for 2006","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Performance studies; Library science; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.12113738370492089,"score_gpt":0.28897972467894006,"score_spread":0.16784234097401918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253941914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020826215,0.011148215,0.0007887086,0.012824513,0.11099605,0.00036135857,0.007662564,0.0013903921,0.85462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000521001,0.00337361,0.00025829868,0.0025555019,0.006760163,0.00008236337,0.0024655322,0.00027376492,0.9837097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998782,0.000114927614,0.00012407052,0.00022436421,0.0006414012,0.00011330121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955649,0.00039310622,0.00020361647,0.00024011525,0.002848911,0.0007492843],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011057288,0.0011921388,0.0016435471,0.0034171867,0.0020933053,0.009950661,0.001938133,0.0022671171,0.7373526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00727302,0.00052686816,0.00060820923,0.00345572,0.00062459114,0.0037879632,0.0017386228,0.0026334042,0.75446457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068366226,0.000004081224,0.000014425589,0.000095182106,7.0031314e-7,0.000014225906,0.000009825301,0.000006983586,0.000034721415,0.00039011228,0.98530084,0.01412194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029447517,0.0000029984392,0.000064900116,0.00007855221,6.43038e-7,0.0000148908985,0.000015975143,0.0000069481234,0.000013440416,0.00013115436,0.9996654,0.0000021173025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004081608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006961907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2626474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023761017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038659498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37463462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254036064","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i4.5001","title":"From the Editors","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Informal logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.10014445378068881,"score_gpt":0.2894497823457241,"score_spread":0.1893053285650353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254036064","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027791265,0.02308369,0.0011337695,0.11824807,0.7651752,0.0000713361,0.0006960507,0.00032976706,0.09098421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004005459,0.017680703,0.0008888987,0.06821724,0.32631513,0.00010260606,0.00075415254,0.00048796803,0.58154786],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970692,0.00048350365,0.00030292428,0.0005449497,0.0013740106,0.00022541797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868449,0.0029801014,0.0006436932,0.0011293899,0.006408766,0.001993157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027589183,0.0010662372,0.00088729244,0.0024281694,0.0024003661,0.0077608773,0.0020550985,0.0034455196,0.23148374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02135669,0.0004641947,0.0006854248,0.0018030282,0.0013499768,0.0057148035,0.0032905624,0.005859086,0.1687518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011274412,0.000006073378,0.000029409337,0.00008895999,0.0000017713785,0.00002301755,0.00003575113,0.000013778871,0.00006685971,0.0022795117,0.9800759,0.017367596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001845254,0.0000032623436,0.000036419682,0.00006790855,0.000001070779,0.00003149277,0.000022413991,0.000010148578,0.000029159512,0.000517829,0.9992761,0.000002431676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010140481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002197984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23148374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023029658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027835788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7743903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254815433","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_110144","title":"Adversarial Knowledge","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08290938162915383,"score_gpt":0.25862726399513714,"score_spread":0.1757178823659833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254815433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036607601,0.0023190994,0.090818666,0.013935185,0.0005260548,0.00005864272,0.0001669394,0.00008885739,0.8884258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6438457,0.0053900764,0.024332004,0.005083246,0.0016819759,0.00030453294,0.0005422822,0.00017793429,0.3186423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642855,0.0015357146,0.00012826646,0.00060235447,0.0010308805,0.00027419988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99457574,0.0031495837,0.0002511236,0.0013543594,0.00050257135,0.00016664935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036432615,0.00074129534,0.0005917594,0.0013764395,0.002598491,0.006594118,0.0019657454,0.003330701,0.03162755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01277013,0.00038863867,0.00055359985,0.0009297148,0.011604387,0.009015853,0.0042368066,0.005300768,0.0052670497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018830104,0.0000035362957,0.000022388627,0.000009949978,0.0000022447923,0.000013365023,0.00010951864,0.0002396018,0.00001689241,0.9938018,0.0025633438,0.003215486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016749418,0.0000024215524,0.000035253463,0.00005185112,0.0000021373978,0.000031269286,0.0000779758,0.0006644436,0.00007662047,0.96156055,0.03749217,0.0000036699548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015699697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001549787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03162755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034537811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022844903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10580474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255351806","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_100147","title":"Trust","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.08105420561333207,"score_gpt":0.2435173219063202,"score_spread":0.16246311629298812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255351806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014335009,0.000651181,0.011119791,0.008238688,0.00051331724,0.000088034314,0.00029704077,0.00021578296,0.9774426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15177284,0.0016030142,0.004007671,0.005058594,0.00062271155,0.00019825141,0.000623292,0.00040326547,0.83571035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99425054,0.0015963286,0.00032549698,0.0012604633,0.001857576,0.000709636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99015725,0.002387073,0.0007105815,0.0031732062,0.0027256806,0.00084621616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034340888,0.0006054516,0.0006378517,0.0014892834,0.0030944045,0.011165842,0.0016864255,0.003551591,0.20364963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021867335,0.0005214305,0.0005258752,0.0015246563,0.0043815877,0.012641573,0.0049598417,0.0037656338,0.08322168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022097385,0.0000131625,0.00023149679,0.00006437821,0.000010909099,0.00009627242,0.00076033187,0.00014917906,0.00014769916,0.89731157,0.071462065,0.029730808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010580644,0.0000145783715,0.00026968512,0.00015985007,0.000010223221,0.00020136649,0.00047697528,0.00035270076,0.0002525073,0.22530472,0.77293,0.000016809556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059596533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005175893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20364963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004703613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060265716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255821334","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/kwx2n","title":"A New Paradigm for Epistemology: From Reliabilism to Abilism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Epistemology; Nothing; Counterfactual conditional; Luck; Relation (database); Philosophy; Commonsense knowledge; Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Body of knowledge","score_opus":0.12027528428523938,"score_gpt":0.30668919556904667,"score_spread":0.1864139112838073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255821334","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037686743,0.01829367,0.71776044,0.082540154,0.0015320875,0.0001289172,0.00022108953,0.00043294416,0.14140394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85687846,0.0047293226,0.12356219,0.0066188537,0.0019342571,0.0004837922,0.00013297462,0.0002322272,0.0054279175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765304,0.016379464,0.0008081661,0.002098753,0.0034432213,0.00074004644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9480236,0.038481787,0.0020706083,0.007568559,0.0028116158,0.0010437666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027362552,0.0010209345,0.001782696,0.0051086084,0.003929798,0.011387045,0.0030942294,0.0041448832,0.005227267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037732553,0.0007883872,0.0015265768,0.002936483,0.05885812,0.03118567,0.011509776,0.012647997,0.0009919315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012261686,0.000007051683,0.0001432325,0.000053093456,0.000007983672,0.000017041533,0.00090897497,0.00021599038,0.000057669786,0.9945669,0.0003891284,0.0036206662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005547297,0.000007120995,0.00005319129,0.000026952717,0.000002203139,0.000018749555,0.00015682828,0.0005139836,0.000037086713,0.99595684,0.0032164857,0.0000050102076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015137056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001041763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027362552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005276384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00422018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14470875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255917206","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198847205.003.0004","title":"Losing Knowledge by Thinking about Thinking","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06639461169239262,"score_gpt":0.2695674433269028,"score_spread":0.20317283163451016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255917206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012874421,0.0043624914,0.09868341,0.039938923,0.0009374427,0.000060075283,0.000081804275,0.00038355103,0.8426778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79426163,0.0046047876,0.05003088,0.010839591,0.0010411073,0.00022486686,0.00020555535,0.00046671188,0.13832478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660444,0.0017540603,0.00011875081,0.0004748805,0.0007691887,0.00027869543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953306,0.0027266305,0.00030135908,0.00094819657,0.00043861207,0.00025464856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005026839,0.0008399829,0.00048439266,0.0012215665,0.0031551176,0.011661362,0.0014486023,0.003458838,0.007305976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058531454,0.00043695062,0.00061678933,0.0007297923,0.04741519,0.016782029,0.003832793,0.008947642,0.0022770988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000548884,0.0000046610558,0.00003989606,0.000021542064,0.0000035689836,0.000040240655,0.0025441113,0.00022575514,0.00010019027,0.989279,0.0038693452,0.0038661528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034995471,0.000004841738,0.000026291624,0.00005918194,0.000004116716,0.000059509573,0.0005893868,0.00042435745,0.00016401218,0.9472332,0.05142555,0.0000061264873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017954515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016561925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011661362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044797235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025239717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03250283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256219179","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/p9r7d","title":"Reasons, Answers and Goals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Positive economics; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.11322331642770474,"score_gpt":0.2883748825209712,"score_spread":0.1751515660932665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256219179","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017504731,0.017688252,0.11131829,0.48100963,0.0065214294,0.00021462097,0.00031377908,0.00023005123,0.36519924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78861535,0.009815734,0.05861005,0.07937509,0.0062320824,0.0014651841,0.00034982074,0.00063352723,0.054903198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9675495,0.01979897,0.0015044141,0.003167191,0.00584527,0.0021347217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95345795,0.03599922,0.0023076849,0.0025638093,0.0040909196,0.0015804725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026806273,0.001044556,0.0017779404,0.0037679833,0.0066600707,0.016873911,0.0032755628,0.019416973,0.013462512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0519283,0.0010414614,0.0020853302,0.0034689412,0.04762624,0.023821423,0.0116948,0.018569194,0.0031933784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023204311,0.000006854506,0.000073988864,0.00005033116,0.000004816258,0.000041278043,0.0019935914,0.000072016825,0.00003751783,0.9911131,0.0046077473,0.0019754714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030840507,0.000024390525,0.0003080998,0.00039888176,0.000014218606,0.00011630922,0.0066671628,0.00044135642,0.00024673785,0.8673226,0.12439464,0.000034752884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028497754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001683808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026806273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00754783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035201353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14176685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281694601","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i2.7005","title":"Deeper into Argumentative Bullshit","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Utterance; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05870631369202928,"score_gpt":0.2732412752028867,"score_spread":0.21453496151085744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281694601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05587087,0.016833657,0.25836766,0.15250328,0.0014991264,0.00012985201,0.00015366785,0.00042427878,0.51421756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563567,0.001950626,0.016725587,0.007324191,0.00073391217,0.000106787615,0.0000797769,0.00021878423,0.016503736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863142,0.008303895,0.0005085757,0.0016688744,0.0023655647,0.0008389755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773542,0.016113082,0.001463971,0.0026927537,0.0020051852,0.0003708859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018895062,0.001002692,0.0009486579,0.0035497318,0.0057904082,0.01086028,0.002162888,0.006626611,0.008212835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025068836,0.0005775735,0.0012046036,0.0024389592,0.041412707,0.029358564,0.0074386667,0.01124367,0.0009647309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037704747,0.000003957767,0.000059785616,0.00002094935,0.0000028997426,0.00003014998,0.0037652506,0.000052588868,0.000037296926,0.99423015,0.00043726014,0.0013560351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008325742,0.0000057408974,0.000099126635,0.000080056,0.0000046383325,0.000048161648,0.0011238289,0.00033189476,0.00012098775,0.9679004,0.03026917,0.000007699054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028355024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019119324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018895062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008441112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032005585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09992784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281721018","doi":"10.1007/s10670-022-00571-5","title":"Imperfection, Accuracy, and Structural Rationality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Rationality; Irrational number; Deliberation; Imperfect; Obligation; Worry; Irrationality; Epistemology; Ecological rationality; Positive economics; Economics; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0437841269974259,"score_gpt":0.2709830557930916,"score_spread":0.22719892879566572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281721018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2038854,0.01337755,0.29251444,0.08114845,0.0006271404,0.00010126245,0.00041186533,0.00027893434,0.407655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98221064,0.001012669,0.012683431,0.00079729146,0.00023490564,0.00006567864,0.000069638394,0.000052034226,0.0028738072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754122,0.013620999,0.0016342205,0.0028013184,0.005094217,0.0014370572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92597485,0.05394378,0.0042472477,0.011629459,0.0035178864,0.0006868104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022853991,0.00076477544,0.001979067,0.003871667,0.0034735266,0.009888419,0.00278503,0.0046562767,0.0050572837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060508683,0.00086861436,0.0012027307,0.0023726455,0.060194988,0.02183152,0.0063828025,0.0059896596,0.0005535906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010530041,0.0000046591726,0.00014548951,0.000021135967,0.000007147544,0.000008963165,0.00038438308,0.000434438,0.000022418031,0.9975823,0.00017988856,0.001198782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046811792,0.0000015720968,0.000051552208,0.000012628907,0.0000026397358,0.0000067682295,0.00010098304,0.000335676,0.000034507422,0.9989304,0.00051568705,0.000002882036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004916455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032305878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022853991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053243204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004795417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12086487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282937470","doi":"10.1017/s0953820822000139","title":"Clifford's Consequentialism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Argument (complex analysis); Proposition; Counterexample; Consequentialism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.08721855486844853,"score_gpt":0.2675061887832756,"score_spread":0.18028763391482705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282937470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029193051,0.0025360924,0.0876049,0.076949306,0.001125484,0.00014212201,0.00019918106,0.00015495808,0.8020949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456901,0.0007645022,0.013918737,0.009216703,0.0007509526,0.00016026701,0.00006493257,0.00009367193,0.029340217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99127275,0.0032613408,0.0005378301,0.0017269374,0.0025633639,0.0006378174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984969,0.008169803,0.0006134588,0.0026828428,0.0030006513,0.00056424807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012798632,0.000527998,0.00069703395,0.0025648861,0.0035945487,0.005248258,0.0023678578,0.0049431897,0.00735388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018745003,0.0005843215,0.0009363314,0.000908047,0.028431613,0.0059905653,0.00478092,0.006389398,0.0009899272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004991813,0.0000055630953,0.00005528546,0.000021124506,0.000003218681,0.00002929448,0.00032804025,0.00008490522,0.00003121559,0.9968245,0.0012325435,0.0013792654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009073084,0.0000031941809,0.00007247334,0.000045493707,0.000006158096,0.0000318152,0.00009567275,0.00040416297,0.0001472365,0.9865216,0.012657701,0.0000054510274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005116122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033810523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012798632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006329462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034957314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0676865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283396670","doi":"10.3765/sp.15.6","title":"Keep only strong","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semantics and Pragmatics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Meaning (existential); Inference; Operator (biology); Scope (computer science); French horn; Linguistics; Extension (predicate logic); Computer science; Mathematics; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04381410208818345,"score_gpt":0.25551493596452984,"score_spread":0.2117008338763464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283396670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04392212,0.0017250864,0.23779435,0.019088458,0.0019041831,0.00027339224,0.0022569105,0.003175826,0.6898597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7530841,0.0015488641,0.056440677,0.011238787,0.0015847499,0.0004813717,0.0019714672,0.0030438812,0.17060597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654263,0.0006996206,0.00024310354,0.0011888163,0.0007514127,0.0005745172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99435127,0.0013634476,0.00025924522,0.0022210365,0.001592911,0.00021214338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034202116,0.0010451458,0.0010341204,0.0014662197,0.004015778,0.0047528557,0.0016019904,0.0025912148,0.03738095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009287228,0.0012337851,0.0014063142,0.00078483537,0.0061717345,0.020618351,0.008197507,0.005965249,0.0107435165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008043747,0.000022834234,0.0005241244,0.00015736175,0.000048594804,0.00019625848,0.0021226138,0.0002136928,0.0030578205,0.9602926,0.009868026,0.02341578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002993304,0.000066305,0.0007095523,0.0001248506,0.000096324,0.00040467107,0.0009304337,0.0011078744,0.004351616,0.7270724,0.26504678,0.000059274655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023909449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027101624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03738095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024084123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016214735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1250518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283800421","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21485","title":"Toward a New Science of Common Sense","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Common sense; Commonsense knowledge; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Common knowledge (logic); Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; History; Philosophy; Knowledge base","score_opus":0.24207004612749122,"score_gpt":0.32494956778369083,"score_spread":0.0828795216561996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283800421","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010582892,0.023744136,0.6427156,0.19554842,0.003576991,0.0001378922,0.00035815718,0.0004151862,0.12292072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64037025,0.01895405,0.28742394,0.02395704,0.0075549344,0.0008876049,0.0006715519,0.0006228011,0.019557782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96779245,0.017709201,0.0016367732,0.0054793856,0.006247863,0.0011343642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9249065,0.048527904,0.003587392,0.0122766225,0.007841348,0.0028601128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03999657,0.001427203,0.0028266408,0.009905843,0.007166018,0.020327995,0.0055329893,0.008314674,0.005237403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05050962,0.0010601954,0.0028578695,0.0057894588,0.08009899,0.05442817,0.013677257,0.01826551,0.0018033029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005430693,0.00000558887,0.00011152611,0.000048398164,0.000011232661,0.000021464843,0.0007488002,0.00021688876,0.000034420882,0.9941823,0.0013782077,0.0032357825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030739416,0.0000033372794,0.00003163564,0.00004094643,0.0000026388473,0.000020264251,0.00025416666,0.0004400777,0.000027614575,0.98859555,0.010574115,0.0000066902585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003906393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020453434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03999657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008406988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008180602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21152467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285040605","doi":"10.1108/978-1-80262-849-420221002","title":"Disruptive Knowledge","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario College of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.10964619551919937,"score_gpt":0.28207311104066796,"score_spread":0.1724269155214686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285040605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039963983,0.0027321316,0.02018423,0.006604647,0.0004214853,0.000037898964,0.00007571005,0.00007549109,0.9658719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56882495,0.0054935524,0.012214667,0.0051329997,0.0011695583,0.00027025156,0.0003678591,0.0002209211,0.40630516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965004,0.0011060457,0.00012759793,0.00067742425,0.001249309,0.00033923145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659234,0.0012911137,0.00020233766,0.0012312545,0.00051803177,0.00016493355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024322036,0.0006211409,0.00061443326,0.0018090499,0.003559722,0.009960611,0.0017263785,0.002877211,0.01807872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061358265,0.0004107896,0.00042214393,0.0014722532,0.025053855,0.011285541,0.0058903256,0.005559663,0.004631909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021900182,0.0000031773209,0.000029127457,0.000010767278,0.0000013968797,0.000016124275,0.00071179,0.00003004977,0.000033045417,0.99351174,0.0023645004,0.003286029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028330228,0.000004796653,0.00008404907,0.00006450746,0.0000030930617,0.00007724039,0.0006996389,0.00012598767,0.00015324607,0.8731642,0.12561625,0.000004184565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003073797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033470734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01807872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005520433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003990644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060479343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285040609","doi":"10.1108/978-1-80262-849-420221015","title":"The Contemplative Interval","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario College of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Contemplation; Interval (graph theory); Philosophy; Mathematics; Theology; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.1264093919640708,"score_gpt":0.2722454603359333,"score_spread":0.14583606837186247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285040609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042048455,0.0012908548,0.039719835,0.0033770746,0.00025664258,0.000042875294,0.000048338203,0.00005796326,0.9510016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7702642,0.0012482057,0.024577614,0.0022360408,0.0006043843,0.00040148082,0.0001502915,0.00021900737,0.2002987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729055,0.0010991186,0.00007218813,0.00060133927,0.00065578247,0.00028102263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970831,0.0015943699,0.00011844357,0.0006387051,0.00035173583,0.0002136998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033036796,0.00044364898,0.00053079304,0.0007675348,0.0031658374,0.004884024,0.0013973449,0.0021318223,0.015814042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009718549,0.00037520117,0.0004609951,0.0006678741,0.015471133,0.0075239856,0.0032163525,0.0070211445,0.0025179712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040640753,0.0000029654007,0.000009030107,0.0000025518098,3.450549e-7,0.0000037673294,0.00016386717,0.000021168797,0.000020296517,0.9975827,0.0006013755,0.0015878015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052079645,0.00000514807,0.000045592224,0.000018039822,0.0000012593231,0.000013974902,0.00012351117,0.00020246435,0.00010065711,0.97853196,0.020949628,0.0000025873462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014249845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013076053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015814042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028934705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021839703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052903235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285093258","doi":"10.1007/s11229-022-03784-x","title":"A normative comparison of threshold views through computer simulations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Normative; Action (physics); Philosophy of language; Strengths and weaknesses; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Threshold model; Simple (philosophy); Epistemology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy of science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Metaphysics; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Machine learning; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1899978752220474,"score_gpt":0.3498660922149744,"score_spread":0.159868216992927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285093258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18986148,0.0009817489,0.3872484,0.015713364,0.00045914738,0.00023494895,0.00044458944,0.00040538821,0.40465093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96168256,0.00030974433,0.03497021,0.0003579294,0.000058495323,0.00025148006,0.00009534199,0.00015274304,0.0021215405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98128957,0.012902638,0.00062357803,0.0010130497,0.0035124035,0.00065867807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8861772,0.0963372,0.00254943,0.007639673,0.006277132,0.0010194014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018928377,0.0008060721,0.0011285347,0.0031718188,0.0030798994,0.01043194,0.0035306332,0.0045481515,0.017715301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.108158655,0.00058105815,0.0006864769,0.002174781,0.011229175,0.015209111,0.003949616,0.004532853,0.0011717125],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041484025,0.00002350489,0.00009600302,0.00002685651,0.000006148815,0.000012447558,0.0010854779,0.002494806,0.0000837434,0.9935448,0.0003445803,0.0022401535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032955006,0.000021977337,0.00013487246,0.00007582532,0.0000099230565,0.0000157533,0.0011199157,0.021052815,0.00026551695,0.9743969,0.0028611976,0.000012274474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025807484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025985355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018928377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057582366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003817182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100104034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285494459","doi":"10.1111/rati.12347","title":"The comparison problem for approximating epistemic ideals","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Worry; Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Bayesian probability; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.08906752553776437,"score_gpt":0.3022916171046589,"score_spread":0.21322409156689454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285494459","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095588,0.0009554717,0.86020887,0.003105969,0.0001572759,0.00008163437,0.00021465169,0.000276501,0.039411623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8586184,0.00034343416,0.13717319,0.0002633231,0.00014224822,0.00011373584,0.00027270024,0.00011069788,0.0029622782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98281914,0.011129259,0.00074967527,0.002033409,0.0026820442,0.00058641034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95118326,0.038412403,0.003186215,0.0028546148,0.00330602,0.0010574927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02417527,0.00065145665,0.0013772491,0.003075465,0.001756993,0.006393035,0.002816952,0.0023751955,0.007909487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.116292216,0.0006168093,0.0011530871,0.0022463761,0.0064664856,0.013069672,0.004958369,0.0035850706,0.0006445552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001189412,0.000019678535,0.0007579852,0.00007742044,0.000029013621,0.000036850168,0.00032755735,0.017017018,0.00014623003,0.9703212,0.0006897007,0.010458357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020930001,0.000039651215,0.00020607447,0.000054514752,0.000011760277,0.000048791226,0.00017256437,0.098851725,0.00026033315,0.8978824,0.0024367329,0.000014591165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028875703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011094803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02417527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050470945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013199138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12785256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285663443","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/uagf8","title":"Epistemic situationism and cognitive ability","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Wake Forest University; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Situationism; Virtue; Epistemic virtue; Epistemology; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Experimental philosophy; Social epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Western philosophy","score_opus":0.1199727490701657,"score_gpt":0.3007530126159024,"score_spread":0.18078026354573673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285663443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10546445,0.0043563833,0.10492796,0.03186328,0.0003372507,0.00004192742,0.00014565689,0.00024575743,0.7526173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862335,0.0006798931,0.006417417,0.00039638343,0.00013984207,0.00003564295,0.00004394174,0.00003384908,0.006019626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725026,0.0016024584,0.00011161419,0.00037947035,0.00036182321,0.0002942567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99290997,0.0049404097,0.0005322523,0.0006624624,0.00052248023,0.0004323647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034103405,0.00042168924,0.00033676976,0.0017693276,0.001941426,0.006287146,0.000721262,0.0018375436,0.007558869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009280272,0.00023249499,0.00068528915,0.0010273184,0.021537932,0.008601529,0.004693603,0.002960393,0.0007625075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003638508,0.0000052626174,0.00011191016,0.000012586928,0.0000026385094,0.000016507645,0.0005387106,0.00022296292,0.000023878549,0.9968754,0.0003290352,0.0018575726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027402764,0.0000018940311,0.000111139714,0.000010804063,0.0000015218548,0.000015666734,0.00016783821,0.00036426837,0.000023108287,0.9963955,0.0029028885,0.0000027003252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012382588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072786416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007558869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025712873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015036109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025286973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285663493","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/b3ef9","title":"Knowledge Judgments in \"Gettier\" Cases","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; University of Waterloo; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Epistemology; Ignorance; Categorization; Attribution; Cognition; Philosophy; Psychology; Counterexample; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.26301156984729873,"score_gpt":0.34321796020873047,"score_spread":0.08020639036143173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285663493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68390185,0.000811387,0.058469787,0.009075273,0.00039820973,0.00029402244,0.00019501397,0.00019968124,0.24665481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912074,0.00013577365,0.006395764,0.00058718934,0.000078864214,0.000060636834,0.00010022697,0.000049875027,0.0013843061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94590104,0.024492266,0.004237649,0.0065451195,0.015620849,0.0032030693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8563102,0.10582444,0.010668315,0.012958949,0.011502994,0.0027351698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023524182,0.0006538707,0.0010394739,0.004824815,0.003934366,0.011245494,0.0016859898,0.008036513,0.011436206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2201714,0.0009673422,0.0011981643,0.0025592793,0.018076414,0.027072556,0.010627397,0.005264969,0.00078952056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066015986,0.00017752532,0.017733458,0.00031485982,0.0001465666,0.0014930681,0.053934455,0.0017710528,0.0039095874,0.86932987,0.0041360515,0.046393424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007799807,0.00008498906,0.014102994,0.00022472434,0.00008073743,0.00087825826,0.021795362,0.00915472,0.0034246736,0.9328857,0.017176023,0.000113897346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020281775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020840156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023524182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035362104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013201358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12440926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286488953","doi":"10.1111/papq.12423","title":"The Cognitive Demands of Friendship","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Doxastic logic; Cognition; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05132110497605342,"score_gpt":0.26061929141733786,"score_spread":0.20929818644128445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286488953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63530236,0.00095349655,0.017241767,0.011551198,0.00009008367,0.000025119467,0.00008390365,0.000052313288,0.3346998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887174,0.00007130332,0.0003606098,0.00008296476,0.000016210091,0.000004645031,0.000009714,0.0000035315431,0.0005792797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972389,0.0015939028,0.00008033298,0.00030946048,0.0005536199,0.00022381791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884644,0.00693145,0.0012621465,0.0012814199,0.0010855932,0.00097496336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002401788,0.00022836444,0.00021078275,0.0008377682,0.0018998059,0.0032104496,0.00058994803,0.0013376531,0.0066447817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011891445,0.0002523859,0.00020617875,0.00055341783,0.00911046,0.005043241,0.0036111411,0.0015194366,0.00033304884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014599538,0.00013689672,0.013807059,0.00024386191,0.000064306776,0.00054594304,0.041611224,0.0011157952,0.002647027,0.9095144,0.0030990737,0.027068427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044466105,0.00010059005,0.0390969,0.00013920481,0.000064072054,0.00051797024,0.030045172,0.0045123957,0.0011949175,0.8881268,0.036094747,0.00006277433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026687179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020871696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066447817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001566601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052097987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022229016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294188545","doi":"10.1515/krt-2006-012005","title":"Virtue Foundherentism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Philosophy; Principal (computer security); Computer science","score_opus":0.04667644760325159,"score_gpt":0.25779055139847357,"score_spread":0.21111410379522197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294188545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078923605,0.0031344914,0.24752733,0.02911791,0.00094898744,0.00012147015,0.00017909938,0.00026043924,0.6397867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755014,0.00041241045,0.010772173,0.0015350295,0.00026989065,0.000066699875,0.000050706698,0.00005859008,0.011333022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948456,0.002886634,0.0002600934,0.0006534914,0.0009655692,0.00038858983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99169344,0.0043349187,0.00045461085,0.0015639788,0.0015342991,0.0004189012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062521757,0.00022723134,0.000651194,0.0012252955,0.0025874279,0.0035984362,0.0008237071,0.0019487166,0.0051164543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010099951,0.00022657798,0.0006793238,0.00067054346,0.01832378,0.004798493,0.0040407404,0.003579758,0.0006763432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043589985,0.0000039243578,0.00013552587,0.000016837095,0.0000033219378,0.000018602677,0.0004049286,0.00006503297,0.00008468683,0.9970188,0.0007172484,0.0015266741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007402779,0.000007661755,0.00015185078,0.000030638515,0.00000463597,0.000051638763,0.00018415978,0.00048173353,0.00016899,0.9849208,0.013984321,0.000006142196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094757666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011274558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062521757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002324646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019775773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03306502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295993527","doi":"10.5840/tht2022912","title":"A Higher-Order Approach to Diachronic Continence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Temptation; Normative; Order (exchange); Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07426243732536746,"score_gpt":0.2699445828771557,"score_spread":0.19568214555178826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295993527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022010151,0.0035854036,0.32656202,0.020129396,0.0005871006,0.000084974236,0.0001899696,0.0002744312,0.6265765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.905311,0.001371205,0.06031996,0.0019974094,0.00052109064,0.00014777729,0.00010805546,0.00016968719,0.03005391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954436,0.0025218125,0.00023143826,0.00063425937,0.0007557776,0.00041313807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935514,0.0035522273,0.00048668784,0.0014345187,0.0007062551,0.00026893814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004696515,0.00062237965,0.00054372667,0.0026355092,0.0032863223,0.0079314215,0.0019913986,0.0029357767,0.00919524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008078573,0.0005311263,0.0011639883,0.001267163,0.028823176,0.01391506,0.004403492,0.0052083377,0.0012488972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020822515,0.0000016966404,0.00003618197,0.000006890017,0.0000012031833,0.00001287037,0.00042731082,0.000063447515,0.000020865682,0.9986916,0.00013808055,0.0005978432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004064475,0.000003934326,0.000072180985,0.000021029637,0.000002731165,0.000042009986,0.00016980994,0.0005469965,0.00007693598,0.98879015,0.0102643315,0.000005893058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030414013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003077126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00919524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005851564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019844642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04245627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297892670","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192856500.001.0001","title":"Pragmatist Quietism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Normative; Objectivity (philosophy); Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.056694142080500526,"score_gpt":0.25188571052549746,"score_spread":0.19519156844499694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297892670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0120525835,0.0024781672,0.08735354,0.047502007,0.0015369419,0.00009903062,0.00009956975,0.00024668983,0.8486315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7687228,0.0016708135,0.029356638,0.011972277,0.0017039478,0.00063245307,0.0002082429,0.00044685067,0.18528596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99138075,0.004299165,0.00030707978,0.0011756038,0.0024069776,0.0004304503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993411,0.003784771,0.00037457817,0.0010482222,0.001093868,0.00028758592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065483944,0.0005641225,0.0006280764,0.001455616,0.004954531,0.010458229,0.0016332834,0.0043198615,0.009044407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011200643,0.00040380552,0.0008716671,0.0010200478,0.035823353,0.010864968,0.007125344,0.009936991,0.0031045217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002344728,0.000003836692,0.000011944419,0.000011429619,0.0000012523069,0.000015429787,0.0010107243,0.00008149305,0.00004615168,0.9960289,0.0015502224,0.0012363411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056442686,0.0000055604733,0.000017475704,0.000034988607,0.0000017893325,0.000030435556,0.00029163834,0.00030412967,0.00012840638,0.95142937,0.047745835,0.0000047190765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010831765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001119374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010458229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006500028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043262714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047161162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299790271","doi":"10.23943/princeton/9780691154725.001.0001","title":"When Is True Belief Knowledge?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Princeton University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Point (geometry); Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.09073848087924115,"score_gpt":0.23907487922865175,"score_spread":0.1483363983494106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299790271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008917572,0.03317576,0.029624809,0.23352809,0.003265462,0.00004545832,0.00024377352,0.00016300456,0.69103605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85184497,0.025304569,0.010231452,0.029799582,0.0035308744,0.00019186058,0.00033616752,0.0002488538,0.07851167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99517316,0.00242705,0.00017791198,0.00053960294,0.0012189783,0.00046325522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99140733,0.006009554,0.00038851638,0.00076185464,0.0010970392,0.0003357974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005087376,0.0004436181,0.0006155291,0.0015493326,0.0037063388,0.014595021,0.0012869101,0.005499329,0.007753424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017768428,0.0005386729,0.00043603042,0.0016727383,0.02778117,0.026920509,0.0025582644,0.00743489,0.0026828696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007791921,0.000006995073,0.00013796623,0.00004931367,0.000006330947,0.000086287015,0.0064220554,0.00005445122,0.000030174297,0.9667109,0.013481196,0.013006395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057037137,0.0000061457317,0.0002708183,0.00024960208,0.0000066111006,0.00016580087,0.0048662433,0.00019066226,0.000101786274,0.8931221,0.10100351,0.000011058804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008220649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005135558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014595021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058897706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035361752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04273349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301284864","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-01883-1_2","title":"The Notions of Repair and Consistent Answer","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Synthesis lectures on data management","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; History; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.14527470404633736,"score_gpt":0.26083651861006363,"score_spread":0.11556181456372627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301284864","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054748813,0.013152496,0.81852347,0.04801436,0.0015689755,0.00015771898,0.0006078884,0.00061413844,0.11188606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4796406,0.010574539,0.45615482,0.010685466,0.0053255055,0.0015498416,0.001683487,0.0012188983,0.0331668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9711719,0.01500589,0.0027063098,0.004396488,0.00566987,0.0010495299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90306014,0.07176477,0.0026936068,0.016231373,0.0053993645,0.0008507376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02909345,0.0015146427,0.0028941913,0.004841668,0.0051102587,0.01373931,0.0056198896,0.010474501,0.017711908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090966046,0.0021197754,0.0035054954,0.0051607196,0.051631805,0.06131398,0.009271219,0.013802321,0.0032020023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009813401,0.0000045445627,0.00002015168,0.000038818787,0.0000043852597,0.000009675771,0.00024102548,0.0002046144,0.000024287057,0.99451584,0.0014556311,0.0034712022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000850354,0.0000027417177,0.000009446211,0.000032426902,0.000004099916,0.000015827756,0.0000801498,0.00046877516,0.00006506868,0.99405247,0.005255245,0.0000052878945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023076378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010097813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02909345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055343905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041439584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15386266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W43043250","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-2363-4_8","title":"Relevance, Acceptability and Sufficiency Today","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Argumentation library","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Argument (complex analysis); Credibility; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Trustworthiness; Dimension (graph theory); Dialectic; Subject (documents); Psychology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.052937499533605006,"score_gpt":0.24118303897206023,"score_spread":0.18824553943845523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W43043250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062963823,0.021060092,0.055338662,0.053868003,0.0009839477,0.00003579879,0.00013736461,0.0001681547,0.8621115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6817727,0.014451683,0.029354567,0.010130954,0.0044756746,0.0003768513,0.0004920259,0.0008889561,0.25805658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902047,0.00621814,0.00040309073,0.0006603202,0.002157899,0.00035584337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98364246,0.013127419,0.0003324607,0.0012065413,0.0013805449,0.00031068388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007245014,0.0006965721,0.0014949676,0.0030359353,0.0050173686,0.021673262,0.0022051823,0.00782539,0.021502372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018961735,0.0006706122,0.0005892672,0.0027632904,0.024843493,0.031569205,0.0048715556,0.00970371,0.004626994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004872937,0.00000780055,0.000023167255,0.000038305745,0.0000018553494,0.000014755553,0.00072107284,0.000029178851,0.000033872053,0.98935294,0.0039481297,0.0058241086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035930798,0.0000021650937,0.000034804358,0.00006692772,0.000002396136,0.00003616179,0.00047660695,0.0000833559,0.00007306673,0.9452943,0.053922296,0.000004337981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014290675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021628025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021673262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046222266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039502163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071932614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306759524","doi":"10.1007/s13171-022-00295-2","title":"On Resolving Problems with Conditionality and Its Implications for Characterizing Statistical Evidence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sankhya A","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Power Generation; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Statistic; Equivalence (formal languages); Statistical inference; Sufficient statistic; Econometrics; Context (archaeology); Mathematics; Conditionality; Sampling distribution; Ancillary statistic; Statistical hypothesis testing; Statistics; Test statistic; Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.17394126090791692,"score_gpt":0.327869291352021,"score_spread":0.15392803044410405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306759524","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019234944,0.0011474811,0.95646286,0.0080799805,0.00015171361,0.00011312408,0.00019160262,0.00012214738,0.014496261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65295273,0.0006672867,0.340113,0.002792284,0.0006679631,0.00047749467,0.00027410826,0.00015365056,0.0019015346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9475278,0.034123108,0.0032625545,0.0058166846,0.007951385,0.0013183459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7471603,0.21638116,0.009137146,0.014623247,0.010129284,0.002568749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.073488355,0.0008503562,0.0023438558,0.005792874,0.0045568966,0.007041316,0.0030584258,0.0046889004,0.0031692688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17431925,0.0010087754,0.0027841576,0.004206686,0.033379667,0.016755408,0.010385123,0.010498939,0.00037328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016080176,0.000008347474,0.00023827948,0.00003942866,0.00001663742,0.000039600956,0.00021448884,0.001271911,0.00012209313,0.9945642,0.00031471226,0.0031543009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059609365,0.000012484553,0.00012077485,0.000032044412,0.000005914701,0.00005323424,0.00003696036,0.005195973,0.00019013819,0.9931752,0.0011588779,0.0000124049175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024408174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015308785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073488355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004182979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003836487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3886482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306764908","doi":"10.1017/epi.2022.35","title":"Curious to Know","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Curiosity; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Metacognition; Psychology; Need to know; Philosophy; Social psychology; Computer science; Cognition","score_opus":0.04914850377599462,"score_gpt":0.2682847627537974,"score_spread":0.2191362589778028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306764908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102814145,0.0066222963,0.084704444,0.13414253,0.0013015772,0.00009869836,0.00023559584,0.00027612064,0.6698046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787482,0.0010746507,0.0033770155,0.0062738517,0.00023425868,0.000036912188,0.00004612937,0.00007811256,0.010130874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925808,0.0044125635,0.00029101956,0.0009136458,0.0013714232,0.00043069068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876913,0.0059641134,0.0015912973,0.0018672905,0.002072247,0.00081378204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051676063,0.00042252138,0.00042721318,0.0010147281,0.0025122424,0.0064316792,0.00090829283,0.0024699597,0.0069147367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016553931,0.00031805353,0.00040254372,0.00063909614,0.029697087,0.010649361,0.005184895,0.0042012823,0.0013206626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025730653,0.000018207487,0.0011532156,0.00014804101,0.000025631318,0.00017465533,0.030317789,0.00012975285,0.0008369293,0.95204127,0.004926902,0.010201911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007948254,0.000026790973,0.00075455685,0.0002601386,0.00002128636,0.000406757,0.012484431,0.00034282636,0.0012093963,0.8600153,0.12443795,0.000032662483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010464934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007652963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069147367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023247413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015569592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027329206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308450111","doi":"10.1111/phis.12225","title":"On the independence of belief and credence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Issues","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Normative; Independence (probability theory); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10426348735065323,"score_gpt":0.29417144826884245,"score_spread":0.18990796091818923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308450111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17406069,0.0030560172,0.23097341,0.038256753,0.00051100843,0.0000846499,0.00036790533,0.00015741405,0.5525322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902845,0.00033345463,0.0045761797,0.0008081074,0.0002909109,0.00004445286,0.00007942798,0.000030773746,0.003552295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888538,0.0052063297,0.00048993673,0.0014300125,0.0031650753,0.0008548932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9645891,0.025853701,0.001750229,0.0033067842,0.0033063681,0.001193811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008905704,0.00039402887,0.001029038,0.0025887054,0.0028947846,0.006143921,0.0013374627,0.0023572408,0.007414894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026400646,0.0006268265,0.001058687,0.0012564235,0.03294139,0.010450183,0.008619402,0.007954921,0.0006822018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000130776,0.000009758467,0.00020386094,0.0000151838285,0.0000074352074,0.000025668929,0.0004396081,0.0001278583,0.000050214152,0.99751425,0.00023384189,0.0013591838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006448467,0.00000495772,0.00026856715,0.000014441243,0.0000059726963,0.000030497215,0.00012326402,0.000599344,0.00007638135,0.99729973,0.0015649771,0.0000053298145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023309793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008934052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008905704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032381231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016059467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047098458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308801558","doi":"10.1017/s0266267122000268","title":"Revisiting variable-value population principles","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Japan Securities Scholarship Foundation; Mitsubishi Foundation","keywords":"Axiom; Property (philosophy); Sadistic personality disorder; Class (philosophy); Variable (mathematics); Limit (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Value (mathematics); Population; Focus (optics); Mathematics; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Statistics; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Demography","score_opus":0.07074229758254054,"score_gpt":0.2384464532403738,"score_spread":0.16770415565783325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308801558","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20303005,0.0022474246,0.43007466,0.020388884,0.0006626641,0.00013261677,0.00013781653,0.0002446952,0.34308118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634974,0.00034206014,0.026450796,0.001799656,0.00020497602,0.000090489746,0.000032654036,0.000064761196,0.007517258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941444,0.0025189933,0.0001733714,0.00082944444,0.0017489939,0.0005848635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942009,0.0031373247,0.0004551116,0.000936935,0.001054795,0.00021485859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0086603295,0.0003176623,0.00074116886,0.0011823863,0.0019642445,0.0035586467,0.0019971165,0.0024619845,0.0039679953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010472114,0.00030519234,0.0009185694,0.000615578,0.011031555,0.004844288,0.0047812155,0.0036829924,0.00040407854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003965408,0.000007880351,0.00018690132,0.000014530582,0.000006335374,0.000030052961,0.00019041156,0.00079493836,0.00015830931,0.9952911,0.0004749182,0.0028406964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006775188,0.000014056239,0.00018194437,0.00001943038,0.0000044734693,0.00004405259,0.00008892429,0.0024453015,0.0001868654,0.99067605,0.006326095,0.000005937358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012567748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014791532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0086603295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019229841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016813787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045800745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309806407","doi":"10.3998/phimp.2073","title":"Moral Encroachment under Moral Uncertainty","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophers Imprint","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Intersection (aeronautics); Moral dilemma; Epistemology; Bayesian probability; Modular design; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.14771639008013704,"score_gpt":0.2825632207658839,"score_spread":0.13484683068574688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309806407","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2570133,0.0014688983,0.46098194,0.041667674,0.00030792248,0.00014087665,0.000057047782,0.0003708602,0.23799157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98114705,0.00013391236,0.015851505,0.00087665184,0.000088270936,0.00006426429,0.0000074149784,0.000046853027,0.001783979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95610327,0.02596635,0.0016461335,0.0036419213,0.010123141,0.0025191125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94018364,0.036038943,0.0057395496,0.011647893,0.0049651936,0.0014248043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033282716,0.0006082272,0.0008470252,0.0014130023,0.0050889594,0.0069287354,0.0018548311,0.005457939,0.0025365732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07307515,0.0007571595,0.0009140979,0.0009977834,0.055772316,0.016520234,0.011430694,0.009650855,0.00028303938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002195589,0.000014816087,0.00064239034,0.000031055864,0.0000146615275,0.00013179755,0.006647092,0.0014718962,0.00032510978,0.9850353,0.00034227196,0.005321719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009207765,0.0000123055925,0.0003554565,0.00004238817,0.000008452302,0.00009218358,0.0010898197,0.0036885322,0.00048378005,0.9884708,0.0057270085,0.000020067906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001762159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013779129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033282716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038498186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031066006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17601788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311441906","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i4.7165","title":"You Cannot Judge an Argument by its Closure","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Rhetorical question; Dialectic; Closure (psychology); Epistemology; Identity (music); Word (group theory); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.06573458011078719,"score_gpt":0.26390506638099964,"score_spread":0.19817048627021244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311441906","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031695817,0.0061561423,0.41806534,0.2137313,0.01882566,0.001146759,0.0006981996,0.0021128184,0.3075679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5878485,0.0035474962,0.2990864,0.029973092,0.009148947,0.0019281617,0.0010060996,0.0018800504,0.0655812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.957233,0.01824362,0.0047338856,0.007035887,0.010978602,0.0017749142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8278659,0.0936657,0.013963655,0.023887353,0.035975203,0.004642164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040340133,0.0015322946,0.0026516593,0.005448603,0.005368292,0.013598067,0.00418996,0.010203722,0.023316486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26562476,0.0010934861,0.0016293444,0.0017578512,0.023796804,0.03556823,0.009782042,0.012036596,0.012754858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020613987,0.000070706,0.0007169296,0.0004227445,0.00009471376,0.0004104633,0.0058861547,0.00031212726,0.0009144758,0.91370803,0.038986254,0.03827136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006609201,0.0000466325,0.00028613422,0.0005682576,0.000043591685,0.00035943458,0.002171709,0.001487466,0.0007945475,0.8750003,0.11910557,0.00007032353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013599668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010903525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040340133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028982263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005420148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2133416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312125916","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.42","title":"Mental Imagery and the Epistemology of Testimony","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Testimonial; Externalism; Appeal; Epistemology; Internalism and externalism; Mental image; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognition; Law","score_opus":0.04555395362339027,"score_gpt":0.22928907143700436,"score_spread":0.1837351178136141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312125916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29474124,0.0058423798,0.13393283,0.061731823,0.0006540538,0.00013067995,0.0001620766,0.00013183207,0.50267303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99460936,0.0003584604,0.0035487227,0.0003856879,0.00007742405,0.000020183983,0.00001880834,0.000012293061,0.00096909504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886645,0.0084235985,0.00043240815,0.00065561046,0.0012762528,0.0005475156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96628165,0.025930947,0.0025745216,0.002336687,0.0021019827,0.00077418564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008911725,0.00035411667,0.0003978727,0.0031147138,0.0043873577,0.0070575173,0.0015886206,0.0029855515,0.0045553287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0343417,0.0004346216,0.00038892752,0.0013395508,0.06263731,0.009539798,0.006925833,0.004194583,0.000305755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024493502,0.00002310248,0.00071476673,0.00013374165,0.000009681931,0.0002494787,0.041932188,0.00029628957,0.00030290367,0.94976074,0.0007267799,0.005825859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028727087,0.000021469186,0.0012002889,0.0003567778,0.000011737988,0.00051929435,0.02289064,0.0018187765,0.0006563156,0.9580456,0.014421659,0.000028711172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036458464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022228782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008911725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039295815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002402389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047130287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312131384","doi":"10.14307/jfcs114.4.58","title":"Principle-Based Practice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Position (finance); Movement (music); Power (physics); Engineering; Sociology; Aesthetics; Business; Art; Physics","score_opus":0.13452355507814376,"score_gpt":0.3533295662925538,"score_spread":0.21880601121441004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312131384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055491594,0.0019730607,0.44591045,0.04304094,0.0012392765,0.0010720931,0.00015590855,0.0003569347,0.50070226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4835567,0.0027412113,0.44587737,0.008761555,0.0006341576,0.002859411,0.00029744854,0.00034725797,0.054924887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95342547,0.03164514,0.0016763443,0.004932412,0.007057646,0.0012630562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96188384,0.022430645,0.0012211935,0.00784766,0.0052117817,0.0014048828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051075283,0.0011427766,0.0012019812,0.0024938602,0.0060017463,0.011845365,0.004546774,0.005747772,0.019835899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052555475,0.00079900544,0.0015227471,0.0018951757,0.030939724,0.0076834946,0.0071716006,0.009028962,0.006818987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009858586,0.000046227004,0.0001447031,0.00011657599,0.00001431374,0.00003989344,0.0021786948,0.00064725144,0.00008264813,0.97733134,0.006893761,0.012494762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029364142,0.000024264622,0.00010341503,0.0003813277,0.000007550302,0.00007333965,0.00096258975,0.0013448976,0.0001675615,0.9124066,0.08448589,0.000013191579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028414193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031496796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051075283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0090156095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015687348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27011514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312137337","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12945","title":"Entitlement and misleading evidence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Premise; Entitlement (fair division); Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Empirical evidence; Relation (database); Psychology; Positive economics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.6616221113959211,"score_gpt":0.4232730971534841,"score_spread":0.23834901424243699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312137337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09895572,0.012432625,0.24952556,0.17166322,0.0019451753,0.00020803242,0.000394888,0.00023678449,0.464638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97361165,0.0012757286,0.0126862265,0.007425195,0.00075014663,0.000117754425,0.00007262836,0.000057000074,0.004003578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9649159,0.02134802,0.0023435603,0.0032644311,0.006966508,0.0011616029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8670908,0.10254901,0.0076526976,0.012599695,0.0085525215,0.0015552841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031106925,0.0007513207,0.0014462762,0.0047621983,0.005923621,0.01005936,0.0029335178,0.009790341,0.005069362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09575647,0.0009920062,0.0008517133,0.0028454387,0.06519594,0.02130532,0.01001298,0.008889292,0.00065594574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013614621,0.00000570668,0.00031048676,0.000071499315,0.000015949683,0.00028970538,0.0026112988,0.00016887297,0.00012132761,0.9935516,0.0008898976,0.0019500892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008973188,0.000009387138,0.00020847705,0.00021229756,0.000018834755,0.00026217097,0.0006786586,0.00040563784,0.00027779862,0.9844268,0.013472877,0.000018122622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014947832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010744557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031106925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005347845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003225679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16451108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313205244","doi":"10.3998/ergo.2236","title":"Assertion, Implicature, and Iterated Knowledge","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Tel Aviv University; University of Toronto; Brown University","keywords":"Implicature; Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Iterated function; Linguistics; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Pragmatics","score_opus":0.20428411076241193,"score_gpt":0.4136098364767337,"score_spread":0.2093257257143218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313205244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43221867,0.0021489663,0.3360861,0.011143356,0.00030715292,0.0000661956,0.00012706457,0.00032884718,0.21757364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892113,0.00015425721,0.008089958,0.00019458105,0.00008681545,0.000028471923,0.000028274475,0.000024693914,0.002181737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895499,0.00514273,0.0007901686,0.0017145345,0.0021620225,0.0006407248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9596186,0.027748052,0.003343549,0.004860446,0.0036921,0.0007372214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010090435,0.0003301587,0.0004973476,0.0011069614,0.001845475,0.0049541057,0.0013883396,0.0018120843,0.0024973645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026647795,0.00035944284,0.00080226245,0.00059221586,0.01718902,0.012249482,0.0040631793,0.0030320294,0.00036210282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057681707,0.000022890388,0.00093946455,0.000067412315,0.000014240209,0.00017747469,0.005077443,0.0006295704,0.00053104124,0.98369133,0.00023840122,0.008553168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001248034,0.000028847691,0.00071210775,0.000052390482,0.00001883469,0.00019051338,0.0013354368,0.0031812321,0.00096922956,0.99002624,0.0034500724,0.000022669563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021303592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011221136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010090435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020619123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017239995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05336398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318982896","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09603-y","title":"Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Argument (complex analysis); Communication studies; Economic Justice; Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Positive economics; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.16370481807376638,"score_gpt":0.32816689764985746,"score_spread":0.16446207957609107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318982896","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19106467,0.010532886,0.21869175,0.3481959,0.0016967752,0.00024553324,0.0003582458,0.00024139129,0.22897278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793363,0.0008103012,0.01374701,0.0029094412,0.0006032672,0.00017159617,0.00006999561,0.00008185477,0.0022702368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90880495,0.05726349,0.0051969243,0.010500819,0.014017706,0.0042159767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65704584,0.28350776,0.016640205,0.026518252,0.0130683165,0.0032196885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09331504,0.0007849606,0.002874255,0.0079142405,0.013508592,0.019418065,0.004660442,0.014707655,0.007584222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2221335,0.0011093192,0.0013543075,0.005335474,0.08474559,0.032374687,0.01276829,0.013241402,0.00067866826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022313088,0.000019610294,0.00056722277,0.000055559765,0.000029084553,0.00007189406,0.004681539,0.00018992406,0.000039691327,0.98992187,0.0010178991,0.0033833839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011896862,0.0000018036551,0.00006909401,0.00004392381,0.0000050862277,0.000018868059,0.000749377,0.00028236402,0.000036298483,0.9973574,0.0014198758,0.0000038495114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030987759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024710523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09331504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009316383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009103575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49350303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319790968","doi":"10.1177/22925503231153441","title":"Time Does Not Necessarily Make A “Real Expert”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Plastic Surgery","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07635507316081018,"score_gpt":0.26522100416785627,"score_spread":0.18886593100704607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319790968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022547726,0.0038163615,0.04625168,0.39898166,0.008007158,0.00008649474,0.00007935698,0.000115651834,0.5201138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8149641,0.0022926778,0.01564847,0.08703366,0.0030847997,0.00022455829,0.00008372122,0.000311978,0.076356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788179,0.010386938,0.0009795106,0.0029385402,0.0045712925,0.0023057344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96049136,0.01865166,0.003478007,0.004830328,0.0061339648,0.006414588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017199924,0.000702637,0.0007904997,0.0012084426,0.0089936955,0.0104774125,0.0024883044,0.011787682,0.017486433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049006812,0.00060182443,0.0006875002,0.0005744239,0.049287792,0.027449057,0.009247216,0.014259168,0.0047951783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003357765,0.000035763787,0.00030626365,0.00008663801,0.000020485597,0.00011369577,0.005899005,0.00016949284,0.00028558238,0.9694434,0.016088573,0.007517524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003321808,0.00003918386,0.00023451267,0.00027743643,0.00001945212,0.00035999386,0.010278501,0.00025794966,0.00049269,0.8267433,0.16121373,0.00004995025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015060776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00212504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017486433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002954319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007989631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09096295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319871818","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09606-9","title":"Committing Fallacies and the Appearance Condition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.048006236654045804,"score_gpt":0.28564047049037,"score_spread":0.2376342338363242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319871818","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13828737,0.0015962889,0.5071589,0.07500176,0.0012669035,0.00030893163,0.00041002032,0.00070960313,0.27526024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92890525,0.0004344369,0.054930333,0.002217724,0.0006161708,0.0003799432,0.00022772886,0.00022945632,0.012058937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96520543,0.018810354,0.0023166924,0.005313803,0.0054626153,0.002891107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7972608,0.1581137,0.006950735,0.022428604,0.011702885,0.0035432694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028129006,0.00088630343,0.0023300769,0.0033037786,0.009019602,0.01114154,0.004641456,0.016890327,0.01737463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20349835,0.0015628559,0.002232777,0.0024528038,0.029424587,0.025951019,0.012229179,0.018809767,0.0016977644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027220754,0.000021699629,0.0002528339,0.000036130696,0.0000083116765,0.00009496012,0.0006147926,0.0003136963,0.00006651349,0.9949935,0.00091171416,0.002658556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021964683,0.000004904668,0.000041858395,0.000025928079,0.000006204103,0.000060210816,0.00012812894,0.0012800742,0.00007747482,0.99701524,0.0013315249,0.00000645766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020844908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013588293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028129006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004126801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038930818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14876223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321487541","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197584132.002.0006","title":"Preface","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Regret; Preference; Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.16350990803099524,"score_gpt":0.267090401908682,"score_spread":0.10358049387768675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321487541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00079975184,0.0043556686,0.0026345102,0.008910032,0.019931719,0.00025331933,0.009193222,0.001163298,0.9527585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037739438,0.002497177,0.0012544446,0.0024112582,0.0028758221,0.00014176643,0.0077902908,0.000755538,0.97849977],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913317,0.0001019642,0.00005625598,0.000188924,0.00043311462,0.000086647706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810624,0.00029062352,0.00008336435,0.00023414115,0.0010415893,0.0002439424],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008110096,0.0009586507,0.00081626617,0.0021965893,0.0022785661,0.0053266343,0.0014889345,0.0016258097,0.64356345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048424583,0.000484154,0.0007743321,0.0022690098,0.00069712405,0.003956751,0.0026283932,0.0027850973,0.49771056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022583621,0.000019515477,0.00010281703,0.00013989944,0.00000237039,0.000053682692,0.00011837532,0.00006058972,0.000121455436,0.008790458,0.94886047,0.041707754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024571766,0.0000071367335,0.0001736535,0.00009766771,9.834739e-7,0.000048382833,0.00008057606,0.000018686858,0.000049693717,0.0016140206,0.9979038,0.0000029512873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033020189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004329674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35643655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022260626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021159933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322101446","doi":"10.1007/s10516-023-09673-3","title":"Can the Epistemic Basing Relation be a Brain Process?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Epistemology; Process (computing); Psychology; Doxastic logic; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.09042735606022542,"score_gpt":0.3005804277281917,"score_spread":0.2101530716679663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322101446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056504264,0.0018963818,0.25989747,0.078420095,0.0008555516,0.00010005283,0.00027908734,0.0003156192,0.6017314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9557238,0.0006690945,0.025831854,0.0022529357,0.00038945582,0.00012298985,0.00006448471,0.00019156965,0.014753845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761474,0.00095025566,0.00008302457,0.00064982846,0.00044340346,0.00025884816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915284,0.0053258836,0.0005154364,0.0014260077,0.00078232057,0.0004218812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005069302,0.0005173952,0.0008846885,0.0017607622,0.0037187112,0.008511617,0.0018533618,0.004184427,0.024441103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018645214,0.00052152737,0.0008612646,0.001675605,0.023690175,0.022652296,0.0043528345,0.0053104013,0.0019025772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004653687,0.0000039366423,0.000042271862,0.000008442319,0.0000039018746,0.000009687525,0.00024978543,0.00007993633,0.0000328875,0.9982948,0.0002930099,0.0009767226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033184738,0.0000014381967,0.000041062045,0.000006343661,0.0000017545194,0.0000067753763,0.00009820679,0.00020707093,0.000034607398,0.9980406,0.0015566263,0.0000021254461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028011268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002560285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024441103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028708882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034264405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081763625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323904039","doi":"10.5840/tht20233815","title":"Reconciling the Epistemic and the Zetetic","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Epistemic virtue; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06218353819122607,"score_gpt":0.2499699023227975,"score_spread":0.18778636413157143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323904039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04409477,0.007868374,0.2094664,0.33372495,0.00317039,0.000060998027,0.00008246187,0.00024613828,0.4012855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95203435,0.0019548405,0.015741933,0.016924083,0.0016371666,0.00016815471,0.000042433654,0.00016187776,0.011335163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96584654,0.018116392,0.0014687529,0.0027494114,0.009907976,0.001911045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9670848,0.020334443,0.002713776,0.0040437826,0.004213979,0.0016090793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029061977,0.0006693741,0.0010143225,0.002713635,0.0053474796,0.014315005,0.0023994173,0.006445876,0.002490432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044974767,0.0005215073,0.00055212225,0.0013712699,0.07201401,0.022902792,0.015520571,0.010763269,0.0005702358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062786016,0.00000364072,0.000053146818,0.000011852689,0.0000019542924,0.000010896914,0.00071910117,0.00006310938,0.000025544421,0.997141,0.0004281083,0.0015353088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009046336,0.000008372927,0.000110315676,0.000059490187,0.0000026671771,0.000022597182,0.0009466806,0.00029311434,0.00013730252,0.9823272,0.0160755,0.0000076124998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019448283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030080602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029061977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073533338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008481124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15369624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323912230","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.36","title":"Indifference to Anti-Humean Chances","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Pittsburgh; York University; University of Michigan","keywords":"Deference; Principle of sufficient reason; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08500891616053127,"score_gpt":0.24697262138926027,"score_spread":0.161963705228729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323912230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22700214,0.002501273,0.24308062,0.03286691,0.0007519942,0.0001329402,0.00015013314,0.0001792236,0.49333477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850038,0.00019302491,0.0069673015,0.001877961,0.00019573301,0.000043286895,0.00001511039,0.00002234168,0.0056814635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836007,0.0071776216,0.00062417344,0.0024320802,0.0049699275,0.0011954844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96028113,0.023911983,0.00242321,0.0049778707,0.0062061776,0.002199578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016295888,0.00042820373,0.000919307,0.0016743229,0.0030684597,0.005208592,0.0019230548,0.00396828,0.006972704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058181036,0.00048442083,0.000688039,0.0008422578,0.021527473,0.0078109982,0.0053840973,0.006346365,0.0008039231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049928964,0.000016112095,0.00053734676,0.000031680593,0.000014151424,0.0000716465,0.0007526653,0.0007773566,0.00022242527,0.99150276,0.00067005074,0.005353933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001989491,0.000022562272,0.00043140023,0.000027274511,0.000007906135,0.0000923309,0.00023541995,0.0018670573,0.0002754184,0.99177223,0.005234068,0.000014367874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020494557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014357934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016295888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039766645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018893102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08618194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327911459","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04113-6","title":"Questioning and addressee knowledge","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ask price; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11613279191161362,"score_gpt":0.31169668253871596,"score_spread":0.19556389062710233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327911459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05369918,0.015329982,0.21266058,0.16335416,0.002811504,0.00033816308,0.000733305,0.00037909579,0.550694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9112785,0.005056527,0.045158125,0.00597458,0.0012632689,0.00047129582,0.00053638435,0.00030833675,0.02995304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.956584,0.033163697,0.0014991598,0.0034376918,0.004031799,0.0012836978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9002517,0.07830588,0.0030246698,0.011347582,0.0060656453,0.001004547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030965455,0.00094631076,0.001182651,0.005876827,0.0060022157,0.022861078,0.0034136726,0.0074602026,0.025577974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09317939,0.000731349,0.0007928054,0.004034173,0.028949328,0.03523719,0.010692668,0.005835417,0.003178689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002383524,0.000021934988,0.00030587302,0.00020960806,0.000018273964,0.00011076644,0.020444421,0.00019039454,0.00020068692,0.96230435,0.0028640777,0.01330574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012310057,0.000008606108,0.00017280884,0.0005288722,0.000015842179,0.00009295829,0.0148603255,0.000576313,0.00056303845,0.90009993,0.08305723,0.000011808777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013459943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015294651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030965455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008421232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008830708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16376299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361011051","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04115-4","title":"Justification and epistemic agency","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Externalism; Philosophy of language; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy of science; Agency (philosophy); Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Epistemic virtue; Virtue","score_opus":0.10720715413733556,"score_gpt":0.2857021834009739,"score_spread":0.17849502926363836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361011051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013917655,0.031858366,0.09017866,0.10115801,0.0017721474,0.000075244185,0.00041173535,0.0001613694,0.7604669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.910354,0.0074692946,0.031115806,0.0050551444,0.0018789906,0.00023890895,0.00032581863,0.00019934613,0.04336275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99302727,0.005105566,0.00022086805,0.00065867056,0.00072481344,0.00026270287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880384,0.008617503,0.00042158444,0.0016581436,0.0010337571,0.00023066426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074848235,0.00085693825,0.0010928775,0.0037384576,0.004358277,0.010088635,0.0016453884,0.005243329,0.012666965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018651837,0.0005417926,0.0007339722,0.0022823764,0.030809509,0.0127218515,0.0032150198,0.00543641,0.0014047013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023891168,0.000002820157,0.000014663477,0.000014914818,0.0000021588116,0.00000532369,0.00028087554,0.000053345786,0.000009009996,0.9978119,0.0009557585,0.0008466372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031271504,0.0000011159603,0.000020961474,0.000043880926,0.0000020142706,0.0000090061285,0.00023798323,0.00011710107,0.000028167422,0.98744905,0.012085885,0.0000016687301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029221452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028129942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012666965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060078544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003959123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043590188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362456789","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffad001","title":"Copredication and Meaning Transfer","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Reinterpretation; Sentence; Philosophy; Predicate (mathematical logic); Property (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07281292118925622,"score_gpt":0.2725259959081947,"score_spread":0.19971307471893848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362456789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25804844,0.004492026,0.2873942,0.019721318,0.0015544619,0.00019574414,0.00048211502,0.001437281,0.42667434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822391,0.00031762506,0.0077402224,0.00091891555,0.00024062986,0.000044434983,0.00013260599,0.00014323392,0.008223237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704736,0.0013486838,0.00021763332,0.000675812,0.00046751768,0.00024304535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957748,0.0016710403,0.00042831388,0.0012577397,0.0007424583,0.00012561723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029924945,0.00058843294,0.00052391697,0.00090676965,0.0017231535,0.0029840984,0.0014232709,0.00158146,0.006237809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007177466,0.00046218486,0.000580465,0.00083322596,0.010788378,0.007262413,0.004604464,0.0041319584,0.00075830315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050008595,0.000013384136,0.000321488,0.000090620124,0.0000122588735,0.0004648768,0.007645286,0.00024835634,0.0017956328,0.97791153,0.0019454563,0.009501044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032940785,0.000058823964,0.0013250972,0.00015399986,0.000056681376,0.00085113983,0.0027779746,0.0033025872,0.0055596433,0.90605456,0.07977006,0.00005652499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001085754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005222681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006237809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028207412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006553071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020867527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362552178","doi":"10.32920/22551655.v1","title":"Succeeding Competently: Towards an Anti-Luck Condition for Achievement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Epistemology; Positive economics; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.20916455736964287,"score_gpt":0.3552015285455771,"score_spread":0.14603697117593425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362552178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19949874,0.0013497247,0.09718019,0.040832665,0.00040481455,0.00017134128,0.00042279,0.00031758202,0.65982217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863685,0.00026223855,0.0080434205,0.00083498505,0.00015635656,0.0001365923,0.000086550026,0.00008018261,0.004031101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922644,0.0034604026,0.0005823507,0.0012819312,0.0012044134,0.0012065114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98293394,0.008466122,0.002321014,0.0022198725,0.0019368889,0.0021221987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077381916,0.00042431732,0.0007928265,0.0013851778,0.0028137793,0.005750214,0.0010113106,0.004172956,0.009370366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016569696,0.0005274618,0.0009063071,0.0006627817,0.026728107,0.010788618,0.00683287,0.0058586914,0.0016274119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019500458,0.00001601942,0.0004993755,0.000025341315,0.0000038219328,0.00009554605,0.00074385584,0.00015566355,0.00014056702,0.9969312,0.000406889,0.00096213183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026777305,0.000028422015,0.0012161842,0.000036093574,0.0000061520877,0.00013429407,0.0009186608,0.001220133,0.00038306217,0.9896807,0.006331799,0.00001775134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009218209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007601108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009370366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026046443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002782421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040923953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362600893","doi":"10.32920/22551655","title":"Succeeding Competently: Towards an Anti-Luck Condition for Achievement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Epistemology; Positive economics; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.20916455736964287,"score_gpt":0.3552015285455771,"score_spread":0.14603697117593425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362600893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19949874,0.0013497247,0.09718019,0.040832665,0.00040481455,0.00017134128,0.00042279,0.00031758202,0.65982217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863685,0.00026223855,0.0080434205,0.00083498505,0.00015635656,0.0001365923,0.000086550026,0.00008018261,0.004031101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922644,0.0034604026,0.0005823507,0.0012819312,0.0012044134,0.0012065114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98293394,0.008466122,0.002321014,0.0022198725,0.0019368889,0.0021221987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077381916,0.00042431732,0.0007928265,0.0013851778,0.0028137793,0.005750214,0.0010113106,0.004172956,0.009370366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016569696,0.0005274618,0.0009063071,0.0006627817,0.026728107,0.010788618,0.00683287,0.0058586914,0.0016274119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019500458,0.00001601942,0.0004993755,0.000025341315,0.0000038219328,0.00009554605,0.00074385584,0.00015566355,0.00014056702,0.9969312,0.000406889,0.00096213183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026777305,0.000028422015,0.0012161842,0.000036093574,0.0000061520877,0.00013429407,0.0009186608,0.001220133,0.00038306217,0.9896807,0.006331799,0.00001775134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009218209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007601108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009370366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026046443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002782421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040923953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362652749","doi":"10.46692/9781847424419.009","title":"Myths and counterarguments: a quick reference summary","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Computer science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.048336255237516404,"score_gpt":0.26825464357810364,"score_spread":0.21991838834058725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362652749","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00063124567,0.059379693,0.00076969946,0.761484,0.13655868,0.00007544656,0.0004998615,0.00013344106,0.04046788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01929788,0.11091574,0.0016250188,0.68681073,0.09818035,0.00039892585,0.0007074068,0.0003245367,0.08173941],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949561,0.002422099,0.00041613594,0.00045875076,0.00129419,0.00045290764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977728,0.016383326,0.0010185407,0.0008464237,0.0033086266,0.00071506074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006841425,0.0013944614,0.0010648156,0.003887201,0.0051002004,0.012576472,0.0032691206,0.011546061,0.046709552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047638133,0.00053551886,0.0009738801,0.0040869107,0.007976648,0.019164374,0.0068712253,0.016934391,0.017343601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001604142,0.000010876468,0.000080858925,0.00043485733,0.0000062504478,0.000107354055,0.0012704873,0.000028298122,0.000041903277,0.031133363,0.9505268,0.016342882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064272667,0.000012334181,0.00021960594,0.002390086,0.0000051332736,0.00015499747,0.0030326839,0.000034033073,0.000041936953,0.013682015,0.9804027,0.000017999673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064995536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049734176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046709552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005628848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045417785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15625906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366398836","doi":"10.3998/phimp.3481","title":"First-Person Propositions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophers Imprint","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Ascription; Property (philosophy); Epistemology; Conjunction (astronomy); Truth value; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.15507037930156745,"score_gpt":0.28659059764503003,"score_spread":0.13152021834346259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366398836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029947624,0.0036999867,0.1569965,0.02459416,0.00079281593,0.00012157727,0.00041160925,0.00037057075,0.78306514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9323514,0.0018031388,0.025868692,0.0031858932,0.00061376824,0.00020017503,0.00027791708,0.00009840936,0.035600588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955448,0.0021361585,0.00019233045,0.0008912879,0.0008195127,0.00041587258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939493,0.0033606703,0.0005565511,0.0010753258,0.0008617899,0.0001964037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006368354,0.00050974917,0.00058668543,0.0014116982,0.0035905407,0.0068998933,0.001285565,0.0031537213,0.015197739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011182132,0.0004980858,0.00066799886,0.0015536885,0.01240121,0.013072943,0.002632116,0.0034373507,0.0030495205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034060895,0.0000031196687,0.000080184385,0.000014144142,0.0000029634955,0.00002042407,0.0015113944,0.000032020682,0.00003091581,0.9958281,0.00088408106,0.0015892962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074244285,0.000016919099,0.00026003976,0.00006511946,0.000010141295,0.00018986959,0.0012499836,0.00044241,0.00030722067,0.9299564,0.06748341,0.0000110329065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012923749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008148355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015197739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029711542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012479649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05084145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366425388","doi":"10.1007/s10677-023-10388-y","title":"Asking before Arguing? Consent in Argumentation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Philosophy of medicine; Worry; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Permission; Law; Political philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.1159527112203184,"score_gpt":0.37185949710131616,"score_spread":0.25590678588099774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366425388","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035055917,0.010842958,0.39563015,0.27029887,0.0027757613,0.00038602055,0.00021297636,0.00019089859,0.2846064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9091032,0.0026831,0.064841345,0.0076692295,0.0012298023,0.0006834118,0.00012956756,0.00014953209,0.013510787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.83450425,0.14362231,0.005491429,0.006246223,0.0071086064,0.0030271462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7568994,0.21923749,0.0047297366,0.010760612,0.006270136,0.0021025953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11526582,0.0014743872,0.0029762846,0.002846041,0.009843455,0.019673288,0.004858549,0.025317257,0.008748117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19462408,0.0016889361,0.0019680986,0.002891908,0.07198021,0.04771106,0.01098097,0.020220384,0.0017695659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014343589,0.000009770132,0.000058666097,0.00004779646,0.000005982657,0.000040742674,0.002798404,0.00015776587,0.000028698878,0.99444604,0.00073833915,0.0016534913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014054819,0.0000022893482,0.000012993563,0.00005809837,0.0000026644884,0.00001977216,0.0005989785,0.0003644743,0.00004162507,0.99562114,0.003257871,0.0000059645545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033956554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001974771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11526582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073985867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01108081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6095912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366809551","doi":"10.1353/rss.2009.0017","title":"The Ethics of Belief","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genius; Social Darwinism; Atheism; Art history; Philosophy; Alchemy; Environmental ethics; Classics; Sociology; Law; Politics; Religious studies; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.09699486660392616,"score_gpt":0.32588659262568054,"score_spread":0.2288917260217544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366809551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002311937,0.011972065,0.0048168916,0.033145487,0.00062956265,0.00003246994,0.00020063655,0.00010109896,0.9467898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34417638,0.011053518,0.0051985537,0.00929989,0.001151165,0.00022062143,0.0002801453,0.00038299573,0.6282368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970408,0.0013127348,0.000120751276,0.00045224416,0.0007707402,0.00030259835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877256,0.0004347115,0.00009343746,0.00028175846,0.00027234713,0.00014522119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025919147,0.0005591516,0.00049918564,0.0006905955,0.0045113233,0.010226024,0.0007810221,0.0030758593,0.034080893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043550753,0.00045580618,0.00045026987,0.00067268807,0.016385708,0.0051824995,0.0031818727,0.0041474076,0.010756438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000110854635,0.0000055136065,0.000082295795,0.000029672212,0.0000034352202,0.000021400543,0.0014617492,0.000050459883,0.00007885124,0.9446084,0.042864833,0.010782302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009272637,0.0000125545075,0.00032048492,0.00024944093,0.0000026072091,0.0000582975,0.0008213131,0.00010547006,0.00010254262,0.37985268,0.6184575,0.000007793977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058750445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068670753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034080893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055448716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037645497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11401194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376130193","doi":"10.1007/s11098-023-01970-2","title":"Guidance and mainstream epistemology","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Epistemology; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Social epistemology; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.20011805754054685,"score_gpt":0.3432882139970351,"score_spread":0.14317015645648823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376130193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021378284,0.04628166,0.07426037,0.31325337,0.0029478115,0.00008621568,0.00017300433,0.00017466329,0.5414446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90350085,0.011906617,0.023626877,0.020252468,0.004283873,0.00033554717,0.00016022852,0.00034170743,0.0355918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97232854,0.019021614,0.0009270376,0.002385325,0.0041672774,0.001170074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94684035,0.039879337,0.001396034,0.0056926254,0.0045571937,0.001634411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024620816,0.00085259264,0.002231701,0.0060659884,0.010760573,0.019840263,0.0035477455,0.011186045,0.009946852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04114372,0.0007027608,0.0008549881,0.004378176,0.10682756,0.025622051,0.009534209,0.017631376,0.0014533035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028875381,0.00000610354,0.000023439627,0.000018151874,0.0000013362612,0.0000049514406,0.00091763027,0.000026903745,0.00000603946,0.99726844,0.0007387732,0.0009853692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053809927,0.0000016611139,0.000015044463,0.000048580245,0.000001020895,0.0000057526663,0.00048810145,0.00009827706,0.00001237852,0.98906004,0.010262209,0.0000014704322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007388906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054840916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024620816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013734703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012119683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13020885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377007133","doi":"10.32920/cd.v1i3.597","title":"Difficult Truths","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Critical Dietetics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.05674368233536783,"score_gpt":0.29409885923520873,"score_spread":0.2373551768998409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377007133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01918174,0.011316318,0.031674612,0.23704512,0.004286289,0.0000890068,0.00022588871,0.000104347484,0.6960767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87515855,0.005001872,0.01339645,0.028098026,0.004200606,0.00025985713,0.00024594943,0.00019514064,0.07344357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937878,0.0034399042,0.00023545676,0.0009724961,0.0010722067,0.00049194717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890161,0.0067778714,0.0004970875,0.0016496966,0.001387767,0.00067146216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007150175,0.00058065454,0.00087717944,0.0018764,0.008601804,0.011225683,0.0014006104,0.0060886275,0.019336982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026698276,0.00040073885,0.00051334937,0.0011176426,0.040086277,0.015484684,0.0056042564,0.009769353,0.0024423818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006932741,0.0000056348704,0.000043265347,0.000015997251,0.0000026495475,0.00003218005,0.0010721519,0.000039380175,0.00002289683,0.9910492,0.0059182164,0.0017914927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005888196,0.0000025939448,0.000042930067,0.000055286295,0.000002138557,0.000039225546,0.0013134296,0.00012605125,0.000038231217,0.9490869,0.049282815,0.0000044102526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001396778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017589796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019336982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038297155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002754117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06468862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377031492","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198744221.003.0013","title":"Eliminativism, Dialetheism, and Moore’s Paradox","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; Singapore Management University; Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux","keywords":"Assertion; Irrational number; Absurdity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Absurdism; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11916636921590246,"score_gpt":0.2567617159103714,"score_spread":0.13759534669446893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377031492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044934597,0.007035875,0.05538101,0.02679311,0.0004828356,0.000027787552,0.00009456388,0.00015689946,0.8650933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395538,0.0023333004,0.010628323,0.00241068,0.0003350815,0.000075805765,0.0000604242,0.0000727625,0.044529792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991234,0.00040305234,0.000029615594,0.000088955,0.0002924655,0.000062467625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864763,0.0009418308,0.00006749548,0.0001483752,0.0001405627,0.000054035016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013302326,0.00026167114,0.000374572,0.0009336585,0.0018815751,0.002371402,0.00070480147,0.0012310346,0.004258172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020009913,0.00019130741,0.000380978,0.000737437,0.010352136,0.004646272,0.002018233,0.0029087688,0.00062481826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018079475,0.000002436737,0.000010190719,0.000006139976,5.910495e-7,0.000016688004,0.00018416854,0.00007672441,0.00002800993,0.99811906,0.00066290627,0.00089143025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019456681,0.0000012271058,0.000017663087,0.000008086274,6.448965e-7,0.000019010637,0.00006558849,0.000251157,0.000052497315,0.9919504,0.007630145,0.0000015679873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012553368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013820976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004258172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033318363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011063615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024174333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377967813","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad053","title":"Degrees of Epistemic Criticizability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Normative; Criticism; Rationality; Context (archaeology); Function (biology); Epistemic virtue; Focus (optics); Philosophy; Sociology; Virtue; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11664729969934759,"score_gpt":0.2987964625216315,"score_spread":0.1821491628222839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377967813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40680268,0.0006873094,0.3453475,0.009232214,0.00034749196,0.0002566662,0.00029545647,0.00062777376,0.23640293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908731,0.00006742213,0.006400721,0.00017223971,0.000056161105,0.000052385414,0.00003757251,0.000042307853,0.0022980927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9653499,0.016037462,0.0029806085,0.0037227168,0.009652158,0.002257182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88729525,0.054677155,0.0126504125,0.019959677,0.022200737,0.0032167127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019163424,0.000731609,0.00095256243,0.0047855712,0.0023989312,0.008139648,0.0015886417,0.0027794326,0.0055090655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10291298,0.0005573181,0.0011461732,0.0018298668,0.016598867,0.0099125095,0.006714655,0.003629004,0.0005344564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008579529,0.000028748404,0.0072016576,0.00008987531,0.00007291448,0.000119642296,0.003579336,0.0043754703,0.0013689008,0.96896523,0.0008043601,0.013308038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013322983,0.00002831115,0.0018887534,0.000055399203,0.00002730551,0.00008718037,0.000787843,0.0051254584,0.000673947,0.9878135,0.0034692313,0.000029909379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018045763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010645762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019163424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035659636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013222875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10134709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378651348","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad055","title":"Attribution and Explanation in Relativism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Attribution; Epistemology; Philosophy; Nonsense; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10490703284357576,"score_gpt":0.28338271502863105,"score_spread":0.17847568218505527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378651348","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094017155,0.0065683,0.5888609,0.08219189,0.0025891536,0.00015677861,0.00029597626,0.0005036599,0.22481619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97837615,0.0007316082,0.016726622,0.0011060695,0.00076704676,0.00007403539,0.00008110411,0.000062166706,0.0020750635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98526484,0.00958039,0.0006626931,0.0015176373,0.0023747436,0.00059970847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743834,0.016907265,0.0020959997,0.0036225282,0.0024566634,0.0005341028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017568562,0.0005651149,0.0009498807,0.0040228753,0.002848518,0.006644574,0.0017497387,0.0038704332,0.0062606223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034868248,0.0005455836,0.0013134956,0.002646216,0.03578939,0.014057996,0.0063219503,0.0050909324,0.0005156108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007803854,0.000006357668,0.0001612076,0.000029028204,0.000008818116,0.00002181406,0.000983535,0.0003132494,0.000043079577,0.9961357,0.00032807345,0.0019611958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006944365,0.0000035714565,0.00009971179,0.000022809338,0.0000050450362,0.000015203876,0.00020959102,0.00056501705,0.000050405615,0.9968148,0.0022018778,0.0000050565823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001885453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006236617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017568562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004896146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002437586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092912555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378831396","doi":"10.1007/s11098-023-01945-3","title":"Justification and gradability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of language; Adjective; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Metaphysics; Philosophy; Falsity; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of science; Absolute (philosophy); Linguistics; Mathematics; Noun","score_opus":0.37977933893639065,"score_gpt":0.3740336892074225,"score_spread":0.005745649728968127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378831396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04319042,0.008234224,0.13786422,0.056098267,0.0011141447,0.0001440201,0.00034926352,0.00022216614,0.7527833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94049996,0.001301476,0.019964661,0.0030884375,0.0010157466,0.0002449233,0.00024265976,0.0001472651,0.033494867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923563,0.0038392986,0.00037051874,0.00155771,0.0012858642,0.0005903149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857238,0.008977625,0.00058863417,0.0025410715,0.0017465972,0.00042229838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008333071,0.00058296,0.0013430044,0.0028087024,0.0054737534,0.006739264,0.0018904129,0.0045480174,0.016305575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023924908,0.00053213217,0.001109651,0.0015646174,0.038292356,0.013833974,0.0045164893,0.0070906584,0.0017288052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003513504,0.000004463493,0.000053039654,0.000010175603,0.0000019466854,0.000005494669,0.00011905981,0.000036592213,0.000014269127,0.99830425,0.00048757732,0.00095960696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047494445,0.0000014974694,0.000045297333,0.000009088516,0.0000012638056,0.00000753657,0.000057069017,0.000108046974,0.00002463471,0.9958352,0.0039041294,0.0000014229174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027515169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020132584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016305575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046988227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025937916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05454755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380149559","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2023.2222950","title":"Gerken on epistemic focal bias","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Cognitive bias; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Confirmation bias; Psychology; Philosophy of science; Cognition; Philosophy; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.3852047704680641,"score_gpt":0.34924673792297317,"score_spread":0.035958032545090945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380149559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12812048,0.0070313457,0.11099436,0.1562434,0.0014009977,0.00013711897,0.00064218004,0.0003281333,0.59510195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978744,0.0011232065,0.006514973,0.007297902,0.0005416249,0.0001075633,0.000071623086,0.00009786281,0.005501377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98879844,0.005732156,0.00056282565,0.0018032462,0.0021618337,0.00094153814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97272444,0.018840713,0.0015504818,0.0034650788,0.0029849347,0.00043438267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012956145,0.00043497348,0.00088376773,0.0029317776,0.0034447452,0.0056552836,0.0012556998,0.004491659,0.008899532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0493935,0.00031887056,0.0006202979,0.0029297168,0.027110161,0.016006337,0.0065846075,0.004609113,0.0009709108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016197248,0.0000044043354,0.0003728489,0.00003190749,0.0000054225115,0.00003852167,0.002232227,0.00011806216,0.000040302355,0.9908194,0.002837018,0.003483668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010619238,0.0000053978206,0.0003173061,0.00006559331,0.000007813739,0.000053170326,0.001034839,0.0002477022,0.00014209062,0.97998464,0.018119289,0.000011551394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038536207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019953193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012956145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030546044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020527109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06851947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380204502","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad059","title":"The Essential Berkeley and Neo-Berkeley","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Classics; Environmental ethics; Art history; Library science; History; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.047042627083861366,"score_gpt":0.269722702647228,"score_spread":0.2226800755633666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380204502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008144897,0.07679998,0.00861038,0.10515015,0.004676233,0.000019020094,0.00025462173,0.00022428049,0.79612046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71936834,0.043049928,0.0052714744,0.018096019,0.0072955606,0.00008030476,0.00029019982,0.0003566778,0.20619154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788874,0.00087222725,0.00007722079,0.00019985664,0.000701705,0.00026025236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969602,0.0013653144,0.0002786567,0.00038195596,0.00062936597,0.0003843634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025696787,0.00037897142,0.00045179788,0.0019872738,0.003050463,0.0065486394,0.00068012613,0.0016010908,0.016839465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006528645,0.00024772814,0.0003579079,0.0017828845,0.013871284,0.0062511186,0.0036077762,0.0032916337,0.002258204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014174429,0.000008089397,0.00015599972,0.000074730866,0.0000026932798,0.000020445017,0.0007246882,0.0000505342,0.00003399212,0.9512249,0.036128324,0.011561582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009100902,0.0000071501076,0.0006666305,0.0003720882,0.000005757784,0.000086448475,0.0007534341,0.00017252052,0.000105458676,0.5908446,0.4069674,0.00000941565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056136823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045769718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016839465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005213761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052404846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05633366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380486638","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12934","title":"THE MORALITY OF BELIEF I: HOW BELIEFS WRONG","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit Antwerpen; York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Morality; Surprise; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14627878031106328,"score_gpt":0.2871261165920353,"score_spread":0.140847336280972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380486638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07320632,0.009149831,0.094175346,0.31620693,0.0021902986,0.000072850984,0.00019020609,0.00016431934,0.5046439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864659,0.0012831806,0.0024790026,0.005330093,0.0003706947,0.000030300218,0.000019033047,0.00004876425,0.003972944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825089,0.011113922,0.00062205346,0.0011621361,0.003336338,0.001256683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.945762,0.03859731,0.003996569,0.003848073,0.0064424844,0.0013536384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015009087,0.0004630483,0.0007721772,0.0024575233,0.004697086,0.010355272,0.0016965807,0.008059341,0.008892452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053377472,0.00049635215,0.00059569796,0.0018462832,0.050061602,0.010992768,0.0043024714,0.009344755,0.0010216316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013559843,0.0000091141155,0.00031862655,0.000035882083,0.000011298705,0.000084270534,0.0031677715,0.00023679105,0.000048182,0.9910349,0.00217485,0.0028647648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061444784,0.000004854808,0.0001621561,0.00009877271,0.0000068554723,0.0000526614,0.0012412627,0.000615633,0.00010013058,0.9914929,0.006206651,0.000011850379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005239441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021648223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015009087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068567246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002917475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07937658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380486643","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12935","title":"Morality of Belief II: Three Challenges and An Extension","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit Antwerpen; York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Morality; Doxastic logic; Credence; Psychology; Epistemology; Extension (predicate logic); Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.2835522038713345,"score_gpt":0.325109992634859,"score_spread":0.041557788763524506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380486643","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06849018,0.0104044415,0.18201049,0.40045753,0.003531855,0.00022891634,0.00017218657,0.0002083879,0.334496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96630526,0.0020141322,0.014847796,0.008845216,0.0026220893,0.0002796635,0.00003753551,0.0000570818,0.004991124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836336,0.009788413,0.0005720193,0.0017403066,0.003201303,0.0010644268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9624866,0.025272647,0.0021608206,0.0039437586,0.0039233356,0.0022127416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017719228,0.00071031693,0.0016223559,0.0020899344,0.0041850805,0.012543675,0.0028732915,0.009663036,0.005850421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02970052,0.000620937,0.0016221165,0.0014036421,0.05802101,0.017186677,0.011748719,0.019699533,0.0006973841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012230365,0.000018694578,0.00011828967,0.000036205114,0.000004751002,0.000053124157,0.0010223853,0.00024945842,0.000065893335,0.99406356,0.0007334791,0.0036219396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075066046,0.000011064299,0.00010065723,0.000047994297,0.0000022812599,0.000042125488,0.00046235847,0.00081944995,0.000044072844,0.9947412,0.0037132069,0.000008115646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016396077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005142152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017719228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051003722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005348971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09370935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381249554","doi":"10.3390/philosophies8030051","title":"Armchair Evaluative Knowledge and Sentimental Perceptualism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Epistemology; Empirical research; Social knowledge; Empirical evidence; Social psychology; Descriptive knowledge; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15458938485839427,"score_gpt":0.34242750742135264,"score_spread":0.18783812256295837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381249554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12037837,0.0021249964,0.099051036,0.042948764,0.0003350222,0.000052254716,0.00009290162,0.00016310885,0.73485357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904508,0.00039474107,0.003638459,0.0010135847,0.00007967622,0.000023168934,0.000020801242,0.00003237415,0.0043464736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968516,0.0018227439,0.000093256596,0.0004134408,0.0005155787,0.00030332932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965004,0.0016374903,0.00053760817,0.0006023712,0.0005139471,0.00020821599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038202584,0.00028045152,0.00027773395,0.0007304372,0.0019212936,0.004482308,0.0006258025,0.0014328375,0.005063634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0080237845,0.00023537292,0.0004433744,0.00049789407,0.021902714,0.008279679,0.0038139343,0.0032365695,0.00052298646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000129663795,0.000010509381,0.0002873165,0.000041957657,0.0000058479677,0.000047555775,0.0045248484,0.00016029623,0.00023236334,0.9888704,0.0008884038,0.004917643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006303124,0.00000882893,0.0007394322,0.00004620927,0.0000052164955,0.000048958642,0.0022552582,0.0005396294,0.00021397171,0.9832797,0.012848413,0.0000080733125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011750859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009341492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005063634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021228956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089109235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02020371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381618496","doi":"10.32388/apuhnb","title":"Review of: \"Either you know or you've gotta believe\"","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.16470823276016863,"score_gpt":0.35863434089671653,"score_spread":0.1939261081365479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381618496","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020280837,0.024355143,0.004740917,0.35961187,0.4675623,0.003977803,0.004158224,0.0015383998,0.13202733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021956127,0.034842778,0.0092882,0.09970551,0.15878399,0.0046882774,0.0061093443,0.0020625263,0.66256326],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9572579,0.010736516,0.0038747077,0.0019741775,0.024525309,0.0016313618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.563682,0.047282808,0.007185337,0.015148133,0.35541508,0.011286636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041437123,0.0010252241,0.0036588903,0.007382824,0.00718468,0.015243825,0.0045233015,0.011492489,0.115464896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26033726,0.0010161458,0.0017851415,0.0039765225,0.0056859097,0.00621297,0.0050828746,0.005997728,0.11014423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022598078,0.000013055773,0.000086884764,0.0005480676,0.000016417529,0.000060860053,0.000108064785,0.0000118575135,0.00012494058,0.0010404618,0.9807982,0.017168686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030636103,0.000016461456,0.00095945504,0.0012173123,0.000033091015,0.00013899828,0.00025575425,0.00014430918,0.00023399848,0.0015452136,0.9953961,0.000028667619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006795472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014614702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115464896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050018574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034743235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38626856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382562358","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04230-2","title":"Cogito and Moore","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cogito ergo sum; Assertion; Philosophy of language; Irrational number; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Rationality; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09824327239586214,"score_gpt":0.2751527697158968,"score_spread":0.17690949732003466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382562358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043377313,0.05077929,0.019574653,0.1463179,0.008586947,0.00006782464,0.00064857467,0.000257363,0.7694297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3367755,0.05117788,0.050015926,0.05178914,0.010038564,0.000382671,0.0011891446,0.0012131176,0.4974181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974922,0.0013051846,0.00007855821,0.00044498363,0.0005513191,0.00012775259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99598545,0.0021914593,0.00016372046,0.00069335144,0.00079238514,0.00017351698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023973398,0.00088417996,0.0008045151,0.003504851,0.004350087,0.008238677,0.00095251924,0.0036858052,0.030004987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011391694,0.0004806107,0.0005641214,0.003026898,0.008384849,0.008942957,0.0032872923,0.0038251341,0.007186064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031694588,0.000021070184,0.00016514024,0.00011297169,0.0000119389215,0.000034079916,0.0016061715,0.00013278936,0.00006966552,0.8966815,0.08364021,0.017492773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017229037,0.000008139259,0.00020528503,0.00033314122,0.000012912681,0.00007116117,0.001191755,0.00016402015,0.00020977578,0.4835154,0.5142582,0.000012838723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00616791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00858088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030004987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040362715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035185681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100376666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384616469","doi":"10.3998/ergo.3590","title":"Intentional Action, Know-how, and Lucky Success","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Conflation; Epistemology; Judgement; Action (physics); Tacit knowledge; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.26765947042928145,"score_gpt":0.42024480708739326,"score_spread":0.1525853366581118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384616469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12198502,0.0061136098,0.038754612,0.052800056,0.00028497592,0.0000443053,0.000056223616,0.00006242658,0.77989876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98347974,0.00069149164,0.0023655994,0.0008942539,0.000046989597,0.00002456463,0.000011704301,0.000020762907,0.012464936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970943,0.0017256475,0.00012326625,0.00035369696,0.0004127936,0.00029033134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99410737,0.0039359867,0.00055358023,0.00059166714,0.00042488737,0.00038653135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004209621,0.0003543661,0.00032633526,0.0006895245,0.0023806612,0.0068874005,0.0006889323,0.0027258224,0.0035362744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056396937,0.00021532213,0.0003262009,0.00048981135,0.038897835,0.006981376,0.0040687174,0.0028589852,0.0005308064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059500467,0.000008209334,0.00026997592,0.000019303301,0.0000026808784,0.00004014185,0.0020825083,0.00017096763,0.000033111646,0.99414235,0.00064598233,0.002578809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053062736,0.000008099848,0.0005403608,0.000065806256,0.0000031646432,0.00004466496,0.0019452525,0.00038112848,0.00013475076,0.9813385,0.015521882,0.000011058296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034025137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004221373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068874005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003040349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015641289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022262871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385286416","doi":"10.3998/jpe.4624","title":"Participation, Collective Impact, and Your Instrumental Significance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Practical Ethics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conflation; Harm; Core (optical fiber); Epistemology; Outcome (game theory); Positive economics; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Economics; Philosophy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.31148319377137096,"score_gpt":0.45473190702402627,"score_spread":0.1432487132526553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385286416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030418206,0.006543767,0.036788233,0.250729,0.0018350225,0.000106368774,0.00007074143,0.00008235933,0.6734262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93091476,0.0017450646,0.005958541,0.012506497,0.00089229963,0.00022344303,0.000030829622,0.00007854412,0.047649942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864007,0.0084366845,0.00027073693,0.0016781983,0.0018449401,0.0013687451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98711306,0.006286984,0.000982368,0.002721837,0.0013259155,0.0015698615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015088393,0.0005518111,0.0006715357,0.0010288851,0.007939113,0.011707065,0.0019935074,0.007181555,0.011285217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016177883,0.00035396058,0.00083865563,0.0006982503,0.07910671,0.014898817,0.015310243,0.008374951,0.0013019044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076115684,0.000010690674,0.00017574086,0.00002677479,0.000004562437,0.000028892031,0.0038354855,0.000051661853,0.00004658095,0.9910563,0.0018810277,0.002874719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012381805,0.00002173995,0.0004078632,0.00016535673,0.000007415638,0.00009179548,0.0052322177,0.00017795188,0.00019542738,0.8876522,0.106019884,0.000015884185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017570674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014524561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015088393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030586089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00399533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079796016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385325100","doi":"10.1017/9781009329934.003","title":"Virtue, Knowledge, and the Good","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05296711819118081,"score_gpt":0.21845531855631753,"score_spread":0.16548820036513673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385325100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006973351,0.022577906,0.00515735,0.013492788,0.00046369806,0.000015657932,0.000038555754,0.000034905843,0.95124584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70832586,0.025941493,0.006364104,0.006015967,0.0012325882,0.000110360226,0.00009808709,0.00007370144,0.25183785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929845,0.00035446027,0.00001583564,0.00006075356,0.0001746246,0.00009589356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943954,0.00036328103,0.000032755215,0.000049875387,0.00005513715,0.000059366583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091890205,0.00035028777,0.00031282837,0.00087591953,0.0023059335,0.004529081,0.00038940113,0.0015111141,0.0091969175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001124211,0.00015668926,0.00023911348,0.0010419992,0.01518335,0.005237592,0.0017543831,0.002410122,0.001148587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019980484,0.000004378438,0.000035869667,0.000020536902,8.296317e-7,0.000014394128,0.0010233754,0.000049925784,0.000018392366,0.990164,0.0034915963,0.005174778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023418634,0.0000076340175,0.000278338,0.00011065029,0.0000016108444,0.00007076136,0.0010740643,0.00014113246,0.000055464636,0.8218999,0.17635286,0.0000052253263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021355757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031104244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0091969175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029357555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021185009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030766726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385805837","doi":"10.31124/advance.23929176.v1","title":"The Demands of Expertise","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Focus (optics); Face (sociological concept); Pandemic; Epistemology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Philosophy; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.21151157454587863,"score_gpt":0.3197156595812854,"score_spread":0.10820408503540677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385805837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040267296,0.00433038,0.03946311,0.11838349,0.00065677357,0.000041154573,0.00012650355,0.00009430596,0.7966369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720696,0.0015726258,0.0046949713,0.005394165,0.00089176116,0.00007524289,0.000081852464,0.00007854233,0.015141193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98324466,0.009076552,0.00060115446,0.0019892787,0.0030439673,0.0020443355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9605827,0.024657276,0.0020438645,0.006220154,0.003158564,0.0033375118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0124260485,0.00050654757,0.00074750563,0.0016987215,0.0066912533,0.01129558,0.001661261,0.0055876807,0.012990614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02985146,0.00046740708,0.0005298028,0.0012980464,0.039512932,0.017950332,0.013828977,0.0054217703,0.002425626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102997665,0.00000788714,0.000257957,0.000047687085,0.000005015863,0.00012887687,0.005896558,0.00018474269,0.00010506022,0.9857701,0.0026840942,0.0049017016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011632549,0.000008388565,0.00023082156,0.00009452115,0.0000028860509,0.00021619565,0.0034497613,0.0003588609,0.00007922341,0.93707913,0.05845942,0.0000092294995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002421068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013628224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012990614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004554533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044291224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06571603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385839372","doi":"10.31124/advance.23929275.v1","title":"Inductive Risk and Epistemically Detrimental Dissent in Policy-Relevant Science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Faith; Harm; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08713129383442356,"score_gpt":0.32731960503647467,"score_spread":0.2401883112020511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385839372","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052160032,0.0035444289,0.5217932,0.12267204,0.0012856052,0.00049420237,0.0002440268,0.00022857275,0.29757795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9103515,0.00092613243,0.06862609,0.009028957,0.0013864398,0.0010498344,0.00007024192,0.00010091018,0.008459895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90102756,0.06440234,0.0041301483,0.008481208,0.017988628,0.0039701336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7994662,0.16062346,0.013107173,0.016146237,0.007873801,0.0027831432],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.090188846,0.0013835765,0.0020103308,0.004395672,0.0065577663,0.011945273,0.0043979785,0.01009003,0.006222752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14533943,0.0010855839,0.0035248152,0.002643386,0.06628453,0.018551985,0.016036075,0.012377371,0.00093805837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010667545,0.000009543686,0.00022662428,0.000024827019,0.000009561797,0.000029254801,0.00044232936,0.0006361584,0.00002729652,0.9973016,0.000239744,0.0010424354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012690537,0.000004363375,0.000080693775,0.00002613019,0.0000057691705,0.000013912729,0.00009886704,0.0013628684,0.000063064595,0.99715495,0.0011676135,0.000009013471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021584127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017351013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99344224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011521153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008437601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4769699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386297582","doi":"10.5840/eps202360346","title":"Social Scientific Knowledge about Knowledge and Information","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Epistemology & Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Epistemology; Computer science; Relation (database); Phrase; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Knowledge management; Procedural knowledge; Object (grammar); Commonsense knowledge; Body of knowledge; Set (abstract data type); Phenomenon; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07669607980000458,"score_gpt":0.3146905150535573,"score_spread":0.23799443525355268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386297582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012414816,0.025355648,0.15917438,0.16875815,0.003854286,0.00024073762,0.0008179167,0.00027100177,0.6291131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7962276,0.043138895,0.06953922,0.028804319,0.013849474,0.00085346034,0.0011110471,0.0002236182,0.0462524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869141,0.006010347,0.0009708884,0.0014170128,0.0041823396,0.0005054264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96388465,0.024110572,0.0024831067,0.005670877,0.0030518072,0.0007989953],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013805501,0.00060401415,0.0012734509,0.004704738,0.0032582795,0.0115919905,0.0018112462,0.0066647627,0.00930941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031007469,0.0005110024,0.0007209699,0.004296931,0.034627628,0.016849574,0.0058412957,0.0050046532,0.0023032627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051191028,0.00000917783,0.00016092387,0.00015696911,0.000026505215,0.00006406416,0.0009642881,0.00035564956,0.00007942103,0.9875309,0.0035869014,0.0070601017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040502327,0.0000060537704,0.00009361856,0.00017271435,0.0000064824953,0.00006180631,0.00033042714,0.00027181036,0.00009944254,0.95519954,0.043744523,0.00000956891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002156293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012548061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041820393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005725567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07301128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386636150","doi":"10.1093/analys/anad007","title":"Perceptual noise and the bell curve objection","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada First Research Excellence Fund","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Doxastic logic; Perception; Appeal; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Cognitive psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04486903487056938,"score_gpt":0.2656883515451143,"score_spread":0.2208193166745449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386636150","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07302821,0.004489501,0.5775995,0.14412591,0.0011900254,0.0001142463,0.00041077964,0.00059083995,0.19845092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725864,0.000627192,0.015952535,0.005733311,0.0006177599,0.00012179552,0.000054457752,0.00018210063,0.004124521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820433,0.0077996985,0.00074541697,0.0029821128,0.005527843,0.00090168795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90555304,0.07165423,0.0054382654,0.009239044,0.006599986,0.0015154668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021935033,0.00072818605,0.0015951102,0.0028117811,0.0027538852,0.008364238,0.0034369149,0.006491202,0.0090941815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090629086,0.00073869526,0.0012059514,0.0015589426,0.04433737,0.020478772,0.009176505,0.011657498,0.0010086293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029563242,0.0000056975805,0.0002490744,0.000029416717,0.000008363072,0.000036398033,0.0004948721,0.00042211608,0.000104400584,0.9952441,0.00077636034,0.0025996407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006912015,0.0000066925154,0.000120407916,0.00002659555,0.0000041070766,0.000019079953,0.00009504878,0.0015257188,0.00009363544,0.99639076,0.0017003849,0.000010552579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032415835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010524021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021935033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005678902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018810441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116004944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386828047","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190068226.013.22","title":"Prospects for a Quietist Moral Realism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Moral realism; Epistemology; Realism; Pragmatism; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Ontology; Order (exchange); Moral psychology; Philosophy; Moral philosophy; Philosophical realism; Moral reasoning; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.11968186010121629,"score_gpt":0.24003579283514906,"score_spread":0.12035393273393277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386828047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015817666,0.010219973,0.07114979,0.38196024,0.0025005133,0.00007308104,0.00012025676,0.0002069355,0.5179515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84985393,0.0056841634,0.024347981,0.038854893,0.0036563661,0.0003396003,0.00016286588,0.00023804276,0.07686215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878207,0.007726925,0.0002443271,0.00073412893,0.0028525395,0.0006213643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885485,0.0072656786,0.00052647485,0.0011618163,0.0016362235,0.00086117245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013730563,0.00050849206,0.0007007899,0.0013417113,0.0046911463,0.0123702325,0.00178753,0.0055752993,0.008474651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014891002,0.0004210217,0.0009008719,0.00064905797,0.0317364,0.01321289,0.007972596,0.011830774,0.002424972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002705225,0.0000058973046,0.0000116321935,0.000012108598,9.1995014e-7,0.000008295676,0.0004996086,0.00007958423,0.000028634046,0.99610376,0.0021435206,0.0011032688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005001727,0.000004296296,0.000018631354,0.00004225316,9.967753e-7,0.000007687589,0.00037645845,0.00030168463,0.000032554886,0.97971636,0.019490367,0.0000035950823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014726102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011087544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013730563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006987538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062484113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07261509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387120749","doi":"10.1017/s001221732300029x","title":"Can a Thought's Whole Subject-Matter Be Itself? The Case of Pain","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Infallibility; Cogito ergo sum; Subject (documents); Subject matter; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.062483248677963614,"score_gpt":0.26858207164493647,"score_spread":0.20609882296697285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387120749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045477446,0.010990972,0.027270468,0.13943651,0.0017705976,0.000058180143,0.00006887406,0.00006882494,0.7748581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809131,0.0015524043,0.0021511682,0.0035917398,0.00068077294,0.00004496595,0.000015551468,0.00005543696,0.010994869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99470973,0.003379873,0.00015525182,0.00047489663,0.0006775536,0.0006027286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935742,0.004132533,0.00032589442,0.00087109796,0.00066317053,0.00043316424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006851989,0.00032368727,0.00071162183,0.0013491214,0.0071134088,0.010177432,0.0012469918,0.0047422345,0.009097001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011791048,0.00042032835,0.00063145615,0.0009923228,0.08112394,0.019448657,0.0068286685,0.008070683,0.0006778861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007314216,0.0000027661629,0.000033508888,0.000017448725,0.0000021733488,0.00007226215,0.0053602485,0.000022003198,0.000031368614,0.99264634,0.00088978274,0.0009147847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000181276,0.0000095039395,0.0001603602,0.00014497287,0.000007845864,0.00016631829,0.007291419,0.0001396787,0.00007017956,0.9549993,0.036981985,0.000010373196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038405766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033724383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010177432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004050162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028381152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03623718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387264426","doi":"10.1017/epi.2023.46","title":"Partisan Epistemology and Misplaced Trust","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Irrationality; Misinformation; Epistemology; Virtue; Rationality; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07855720426159295,"score_gpt":0.28336191399822913,"score_spread":0.20480470973663617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387264426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5781072,0.0024715255,0.13215843,0.03640837,0.0003491814,0.000107292966,0.00010970638,0.000113013135,0.25017533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983284,0.00010036759,0.0009097041,0.00016743262,0.000041926676,0.0000076233146,0.0000050132185,0.000005532229,0.0004339885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781763,0.012659288,0.0011900474,0.0023375538,0.0043864404,0.0012503822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8802424,0.07565586,0.01707685,0.016686035,0.007495174,0.0028437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024942826,0.0003676954,0.00078009465,0.0038185767,0.004824655,0.008433995,0.001631719,0.0047111083,0.004536513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08871426,0.00063371006,0.00046012056,0.0020279796,0.039429896,0.012644056,0.009532786,0.0043655834,0.0003502923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052783333,0.000035337296,0.004090359,0.000057888396,0.0000488849,0.00033657416,0.013626017,0.00082061946,0.00023024272,0.9749613,0.0004491468,0.0052907793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015042803,0.000017038335,0.0012845289,0.00005825963,0.000016730373,0.00018773932,0.0032236031,0.0025278053,0.00026656355,0.9886906,0.0036915063,0.000020472224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016428814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011496525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024942826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050105006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001954119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13191187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387324408","doi":"10.3765/sp.16.4","title":"Probabilities and logic in implicature computation: Two puzzles with embedded disjunction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semantics and Pragmatics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation; European Commission","keywords":"Implicature; Probabilistic logic; Utterance; Computer science; Ignorance; Sentence; Inference; Deviance (statistics); Context (archaeology); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Pragmatics; Machine learning; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04579230929807469,"score_gpt":0.2880126100749286,"score_spread":0.24222030077685391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387324408","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22071522,0.0028142089,0.68947315,0.034051437,0.00015488028,0.00007660888,0.00036395394,0.0005272746,0.051823363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9385035,0.0005306163,0.058294594,0.000649698,0.00028248332,0.00006549586,0.00008970253,0.00011399032,0.0014699392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906481,0.005397431,0.0005318517,0.0015254128,0.0014926736,0.00040443245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9500647,0.04187583,0.0024484335,0.0035416272,0.0011827026,0.00088671234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012463872,0.0006268573,0.0010625836,0.0025285075,0.0019788616,0.008268195,0.0021965476,0.0032110158,0.006000662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052409146,0.0011535711,0.0014428521,0.0020509143,0.020937594,0.029990481,0.0052702758,0.0057423706,0.00046501955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004494767,0.000020328673,0.00083975226,0.000042592586,0.000014993855,0.000063118125,0.0010343166,0.0019394354,0.00021075562,0.989106,0.00030263144,0.0063812463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007813882,0.0000058561686,0.00027253592,0.000010793437,0.0000036944011,0.00003084385,0.000115937386,0.004994234,0.00009337907,0.9941016,0.00035533216,0.000008010818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015349779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001175644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012463872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002098766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012485737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387334457","doi":"10.3765/sp.16.3","title":"Context Dynamics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semantics and Pragmatics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Computer science; Generalization; Conversation; Natural (archaeology); Context (archaeology); Simple (philosophy); Sentence; Natural language; Artificial intelligence; Dynamics (music); Natural language processing; Linguistics; Epistemology; Psychology; Programming language","score_opus":0.050413288795176224,"score_gpt":0.26466510428716916,"score_spread":0.21425181549199293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387334457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02806098,0.002789606,0.27715093,0.009599085,0.00062319636,0.00017832575,0.00063415134,0.0005091865,0.68045455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82975286,0.0019768367,0.062688485,0.0013879942,0.00040215987,0.00038231246,0.00058840326,0.0003787495,0.10244208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985538,0.0004469342,0.00006556248,0.00048118326,0.00028289692,0.00016954928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849963,0.00054679695,0.00009517631,0.00040368945,0.0002547264,0.00019993514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014084915,0.0006672327,0.00054985983,0.0013813232,0.0029643646,0.0048565897,0.0016662222,0.0018830451,0.044736844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005623027,0.0005258156,0.000825129,0.0010539517,0.0032985809,0.012436838,0.0057515604,0.002299595,0.0046663005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007275944,0.0000043006085,0.00010828699,0.00001555684,0.0000041947883,0.00006178569,0.0003917389,0.00047437943,0.00019146656,0.994769,0.00090854376,0.003063658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012151798,0.000012148437,0.00018122875,0.000042021067,0.000010960743,0.00016229755,0.00072142354,0.00500538,0.00029533487,0.9135719,0.07997033,0.000014824413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038620096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036282835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044736844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025426913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014868419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14965963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387429766","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12952","title":"Norms of Inquiry","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Normative; Epistemology; Norm (philosophy); Relation (database); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.2256646157597476,"score_gpt":0.3166112092298294,"score_spread":0.09094659347008177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387429766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019568093,0.01978485,0.2664904,0.0712831,0.0019647009,0.00025796975,0.0003274072,0.0003256267,0.61999786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8982436,0.010179267,0.057446737,0.009332934,0.0025689006,0.0007694922,0.0003839505,0.00029124078,0.020783797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9157985,0.05805879,0.004094169,0.0061060414,0.013814664,0.0021278262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9011455,0.070922635,0.005164531,0.010369014,0.010305752,0.0020925626],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03861093,0.0007340302,0.0013542688,0.003403701,0.0050215167,0.018164525,0.0026035556,0.0062362775,0.0058012228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07121894,0.0005354931,0.00085662724,0.0028959864,0.06305783,0.019034866,0.0074129472,0.0073169195,0.001142578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021038875,0.0000020058305,0.00005482857,0.000016936057,0.0000016273001,0.0000062981253,0.0008087416,0.00008508934,0.000013822754,0.99692184,0.0005510333,0.0015356633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000338287,0.000003948501,0.000061361316,0.00010211619,0.0000019469996,0.00002206266,0.0005441467,0.00030899417,0.000038690683,0.96442074,0.034486383,0.0000062630634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030977996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016226897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007416376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072042886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20419657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387709035","doi":"10.1093/monist/onad025","title":"Disingenuous Infallibilism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Monist","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Assertion; Skepticism; Epistemology; Proposition; Relevance (law); Action (physics); Norm (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Premise; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10851475183553676,"score_gpt":0.2802762184136467,"score_spread":0.17176146657810992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387709035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054021254,0.0049039605,0.23361516,0.106221214,0.0014004352,0.000119572534,0.00021748558,0.0009321555,0.5985688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96678644,0.0007510646,0.01636681,0.005592044,0.00091406255,0.00012785943,0.000066849534,0.00019749222,0.009197284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9742682,0.011319477,0.0016132217,0.004826257,0.0067500765,0.0012228598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9609116,0.021216765,0.0019294061,0.009740434,0.0047524283,0.0014494876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021605074,0.0009127302,0.0014128765,0.0025517812,0.004857807,0.009439436,0.0029298242,0.0058358232,0.008462206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045534138,0.00094419566,0.0012011067,0.0012352755,0.052165158,0.017165089,0.011929182,0.011283104,0.0014092213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008905211,0.000005617024,0.000053129133,0.000021206113,0.0000048598777,0.000020952637,0.0003798205,0.00012133462,0.00005716157,0.99741876,0.000571956,0.0013363754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040810137,0.0000033274514,0.000019701143,0.000018944309,0.0000027040794,0.000018275154,0.000052604366,0.00034831624,0.000094425086,0.9949994,0.004433506,0.0000046851387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023596382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018394102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021605074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006891126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032143248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1142599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387867109","doi":"10.1111/phpe.12187","title":"Knowing what it's like","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Perspectives","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Epistemology; Character (mathematics); Appeal; Inference; Cognitive science; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13008296737289965,"score_gpt":0.32053458954666325,"score_spread":0.1904516221737636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387867109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06441636,0.004150059,0.121790685,0.08344907,0.0016397099,0.00007283428,0.0006328703,0.0005316662,0.72331685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528911,0.0011752115,0.0091744745,0.0045433794,0.00028442344,0.000027622227,0.00025385813,0.00012073663,0.031529132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976261,0.0012263891,0.00010656408,0.00037845483,0.000517622,0.00014492024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975737,0.000993709,0.00019896605,0.00043745112,0.00060525653,0.00019091506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018034986,0.00030572613,0.00023510556,0.0007561136,0.002094259,0.0036123267,0.0005864537,0.0013316346,0.012357231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073029366,0.0001590582,0.00027841772,0.0006779349,0.012640414,0.0082870675,0.0019773138,0.002706569,0.0018515218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035375877,0.000017048058,0.0008390644,0.000083114326,0.000012761698,0.00013127548,0.013109683,0.00039364636,0.00067548954,0.9514596,0.015136882,0.018106174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006337481,0.000029977351,0.0010668209,0.00019461733,0.000014827543,0.00040744027,0.007088439,0.0011095135,0.0010459363,0.7459532,0.24304165,0.000041192885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044663185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032111804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012357231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025392745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011604102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04133904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387894874","doi":"10.1111/phpe.12178","title":"A planning theory of belief","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Perspectives","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15891932487628246,"score_gpt":0.3266843273695514,"score_spread":0.16776500249326892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387894874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009611763,0.0053646704,0.44321272,0.024350299,0.00047670022,0.00022883125,0.0010480022,0.00043007827,0.5152769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77429736,0.0051460834,0.15259519,0.0034733163,0.00073973177,0.000588785,0.000940498,0.0001889857,0.06203016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790704,0.0009840406,0.00010661838,0.0003717073,0.00042854797,0.00020213406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711275,0.0017765006,0.00020822715,0.00032840058,0.00039210805,0.00018189767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024411203,0.0008041411,0.0005645539,0.0011621431,0.0021900316,0.0054632737,0.0017053823,0.0026106753,0.016588494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051586833,0.0004665331,0.0015225398,0.0016133753,0.009025946,0.00899056,0.0026417107,0.0040228926,0.0024298297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043526625,0.000004266183,0.00005600868,0.000024469851,0.0000030631638,0.000019343073,0.00023126409,0.00058480055,0.000021907956,0.9947135,0.0010211103,0.003315972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000088827655,0.000007536362,0.00006788654,0.000034737786,0.000005032033,0.00002892197,0.000110061126,0.0021274067,0.000034575638,0.9849244,0.01264561,0.000005020155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009111243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054998877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016588494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048745847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032127684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05549401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387934042","doi":"10.32920/24435328.v1","title":"Lacking, needing, and wanting","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Epistemology; Psychology; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.2498286428352913,"score_gpt":0.31878755060483716,"score_spread":0.06895890776954586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387934042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061867133,0.005636416,0.050618816,0.052226774,0.0007609078,0.000052823212,0.00021068778,0.00014232239,0.8284842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601431,0.0013393769,0.0059923097,0.0024179725,0.00024052439,0.00007668356,0.00007887645,0.00008888936,0.029622337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977946,0.001263415,0.00007139612,0.0002507204,0.0003549986,0.0002648734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979646,0.0010076296,0.00024090645,0.0002655833,0.0001921749,0.0003291909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022241771,0.00041082993,0.0003484883,0.0010057588,0.003024299,0.0058757267,0.000665098,0.0022710152,0.009891916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031439804,0.00024927364,0.00050552544,0.00093136664,0.022540666,0.009306156,0.0037212844,0.0036173519,0.0009136168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059158333,0.0000068676327,0.00014852341,0.000022004735,0.0000018466822,0.0000359714,0.002627367,0.000034286135,0.000080558326,0.99401927,0.0014680881,0.0015491681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007511759,0.000012343762,0.00041556772,0.00007106238,0.000006077658,0.00019251983,0.0037256887,0.0003448075,0.00020063984,0.9410674,0.053942937,0.000013426323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014493812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001306157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009891916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024508971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001055648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033091784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387958773","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04331-y","title":"On the zetetic significance of peer disagreement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; State (computer science); Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.11093289523001966,"score_gpt":0.2861970942935,"score_spread":0.17526419906348034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387958773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063165605,0.008807583,0.054867025,0.1856809,0.002709021,0.00011126281,0.00025841416,0.00010025984,0.68429995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840121,0.0016308989,0.0044169575,0.0023220258,0.000858808,0.000086545406,0.000053723383,0.00007333535,0.006545694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98049575,0.015790764,0.0003715047,0.0009778012,0.0017361394,0.00062809134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9144102,0.072464734,0.0026824304,0.0051936856,0.004503823,0.0007451917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019483794,0.0005067146,0.00060519663,0.0038947542,0.0066338317,0.009873569,0.0021790245,0.004457696,0.011769699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084812336,0.0003736547,0.00030800077,0.002925669,0.04186729,0.021609304,0.0059232446,0.0053003537,0.0010893076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014069698,0.0000051523966,0.00014532698,0.00004329154,0.000004398353,0.00003204801,0.0048710136,0.00009869853,0.000023620243,0.9905613,0.0013984713,0.0028025163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015097476,0.000005654054,0.00039955947,0.0002022472,0.00000807823,0.00005255309,0.0067662457,0.00047776423,0.00015208178,0.97024477,0.021668661,0.0000073565466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013069889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001644527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019483794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004230631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040957145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10304135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388267503","doi":"10.32920/24435331","title":"The metaphysics of responsible believing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Mental state; Epistemology; Philosophy; Inference; State (computer science); Reflection (computer programming); Psychology; Cognitive science; Computer science","score_opus":0.21207122091008862,"score_gpt":0.3231747090998357,"score_spread":0.11110348818974708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388267503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056928586,0.009771387,0.10754588,0.11278976,0.0009083681,0.0000875228,0.00028549775,0.00027746917,0.7114055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775344,0.0013754411,0.008131841,0.0020024176,0.00036954752,0.00010155155,0.000075441654,0.00006535386,0.010344003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636465,0.00200957,0.00014354628,0.00049341965,0.0007056925,0.00028313437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681085,0.0018298198,0.00023876764,0.0005833421,0.00035973982,0.00017751049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037139885,0.00041183163,0.00041125296,0.0010833282,0.0033070398,0.006177434,0.0010789499,0.0037924626,0.0040926347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070733298,0.00039625398,0.0007954994,0.0006259734,0.029854923,0.007900344,0.00334673,0.0055235727,0.0007900203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022176632,0.0000033388078,0.00003652881,0.000008736751,0.0000020700822,0.000017102433,0.00051849557,0.00013463282,0.00002924934,0.99794596,0.0006243815,0.00067729154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038803037,0.0000011784635,0.000048783415,0.000009999131,0.0000013865607,0.000013555816,0.00011023486,0.0003338374,0.00002653829,0.99556726,0.0038813904,0.0000020410203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005002092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018438444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006528722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006528722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002510963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04736942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388267728","doi":"10.32920/24435331.v1","title":"The metaphysics of responsible believing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Mental state; Epistemology; Philosophy; Inference; State (computer science); Reflection (computer programming); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.21207122091008862,"score_gpt":0.3231747090998357,"score_spread":0.11110348818974708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388267728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056928586,0.009771387,0.10754588,0.11278976,0.0009083681,0.0000875228,0.00028549775,0.00027746917,0.7114055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775344,0.0013754411,0.008131841,0.0020024176,0.00036954752,0.00010155155,0.000075441654,0.00006535386,0.010344003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636465,0.00200957,0.00014354628,0.00049341965,0.0007056925,0.00028313437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681085,0.0018298198,0.00023876764,0.0005833421,0.00035973982,0.00017751049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037139885,0.00041183163,0.00041125296,0.0010833282,0.0033070398,0.006177434,0.0010789499,0.0037924626,0.0040926347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070733298,0.00039625398,0.0007954994,0.0006259734,0.029854923,0.007900344,0.00334673,0.0055235727,0.0007900203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022176632,0.0000033388078,0.00003652881,0.000008736751,0.0000020700822,0.000017102433,0.00051849557,0.00013463282,0.00002924934,0.99794596,0.0006243815,0.00067729154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038803037,0.0000011784635,0.000048783415,0.000009999131,0.0000013865607,0.000013555816,0.00011023486,0.0003338374,0.00002653829,0.99556726,0.0038813904,0.0000020410203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005002092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018438444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006528722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006528722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002510963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04736942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388270033","doi":"10.32920/24435328","title":"Lacking, needing, and wanting","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Epistemology; Psychology; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.2498286428352913,"score_gpt":0.31878755060483716,"score_spread":0.06895890776954586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388270033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061867133,0.005636416,0.050618816,0.052226774,0.0007609078,0.000052823212,0.00021068778,0.00014232239,0.8284842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601431,0.0013393769,0.0059923097,0.0024179725,0.00024052439,0.00007668356,0.00007887645,0.00008888936,0.029622337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977946,0.001263415,0.00007139612,0.0002507204,0.0003549986,0.0002648734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979646,0.0010076296,0.00024090645,0.0002655833,0.0001921749,0.0003291909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022241771,0.00041082993,0.0003484883,0.0010057588,0.003024299,0.0058757267,0.000665098,0.0022710152,0.009891916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031439804,0.00024927364,0.00050552544,0.00093136664,0.022540666,0.009306156,0.0037212844,0.0036173519,0.0009136168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059158333,0.0000068676327,0.00014852341,0.000022004735,0.0000018466822,0.0000359714,0.002627367,0.000034286135,0.000080558326,0.99401927,0.0014680881,0.0015491681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007511759,0.000012343762,0.00041556772,0.00007106238,0.000006077658,0.00019251983,0.0037256887,0.0003448075,0.00020063984,0.9410674,0.053942937,0.000013426323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014493812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001306157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009891916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024508971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001055648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033091784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388387924","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195140774.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Epistemology; Counterexample; Demise; Philosophy; Defeasible reasoning; Focus (optics); Class (philosophy); Quarter (Canadian coin); Mathematics; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.06976207689463149,"score_gpt":0.24222754908409277,"score_spread":0.1724654721894613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388387924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010885918,0.004441499,0.0034385764,0.011076575,0.006857083,0.00015505137,0.0041395347,0.00083769875,0.9679653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012267649,0.0038211914,0.0020946711,0.0042491667,0.0024048558,0.00016998344,0.00463203,0.0004723688,0.96988803],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872285,0.00016240423,0.00006874995,0.00034105632,0.0005386721,0.0001663342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837923,0.00018219698,0.0000866152,0.00025742408,0.0007694481,0.00032501537],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010163205,0.0010138955,0.00062452385,0.0018601869,0.0025752834,0.0075889146,0.0021048929,0.003196496,0.5582152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034816868,0.0003786435,0.00073580525,0.0018465441,0.0011525024,0.0047209454,0.0039288257,0.0029584204,0.3826626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055878256,0.00006412477,0.0004241496,0.00030336433,0.0000061488336,0.00013770592,0.0005143166,0.00015030145,0.00034927443,0.112049654,0.7649084,0.121036656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029495359,0.00000829232,0.00018308725,0.00010555007,0.0000014551898,0.000051325937,0.00008979335,0.000023208884,0.00006169,0.0052774968,0.9941912,0.0000038390845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037897003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029543992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5582152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030847448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028792035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63015234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388634726","doi":"10.1080/02580136.2023.2273119","title":"Knowledge and society: A comprehensive approach to social epistemology","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Social epistemology; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Epistemology; Sociology; Dimension (graph theory); Evolutionary epistemology; Meta-epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1223028523450762,"score_gpt":0.2941428951324007,"score_spread":0.1718400427873245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388634726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024866628,0.032383855,0.2798707,0.08295628,0.0009140378,0.00021233973,0.00014169002,0.00017520343,0.57847923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89748937,0.013219113,0.066574074,0.004383662,0.0009327949,0.00034760794,0.00008554906,0.00007993579,0.01688779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946648,0.0032532967,0.00016396806,0.00035018267,0.0011962589,0.00037146444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996176,0.0022969977,0.00023466026,0.00042402587,0.00047822957,0.00039002008],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006820453,0.00070846756,0.0009445723,0.005225735,0.0056864894,0.012260246,0.0011307984,0.0036447314,0.0021936544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040616766,0.000385745,0.00068656984,0.003264388,0.03623309,0.014688644,0.008201218,0.0037018585,0.00033367012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.1174153e-7,0.0000035307485,0.00004148743,0.000026253452,0.0000027009994,0.00002196472,0.0017999548,0.00022781797,0.00002672743,0.99492633,0.0005041336,0.002418374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021054802,0.0000047195504,0.00008256802,0.00007686056,0.0000026722382,0.00002898272,0.0010302216,0.0003921203,0.000019812696,0.97480243,0.023553276,0.000004197531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043665613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004512343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99431354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007452886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009660293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054074764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388752012","doi":"10.3998/ergo.4656","title":"The Motivation Problem of Epistemic Expressivists","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Collège Montmorency","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Templeton World Charity Foundation; Université de Montréal","keywords":"Expressivism; Epistemology; Praise; Criticism; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.2396739129198414,"score_gpt":0.39749582501040454,"score_spread":0.15782191209056315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388752012","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042038478,0.0032809414,0.35057193,0.30405962,0.0014759157,0.0001464147,0.00012924639,0.00036173523,0.29793566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9275554,0.0011600745,0.041446842,0.014025502,0.0017654316,0.0004844928,0.000055963574,0.0002933017,0.013213112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741571,0.014482168,0.001126339,0.003142664,0.005920058,0.0011717642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9591842,0.02753812,0.0025509554,0.0050189327,0.0044410694,0.0012665486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03063845,0.0008273374,0.0012033134,0.0016605526,0.0053497017,0.0094206985,0.0028042665,0.009996105,0.006541384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04913268,0.0010305522,0.0016668799,0.0011330675,0.033455055,0.025198083,0.010032956,0.015476285,0.0012263433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063421166,0.000006269879,0.000052532807,0.000015084959,0.000005103368,0.000014136764,0.00077046105,0.00006870225,0.000051363284,0.996759,0.00071008835,0.0015408244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010267737,0.0000044541653,0.000032334807,0.000017689732,0.0000034663842,0.00001988838,0.00019281048,0.0003264787,0.000071234026,0.99353385,0.0057808897,0.0000064919936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009604586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007360988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03063845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004068437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033537226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16203356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388786092","doi":"10.1332/20437897y2023d000000022","title":"Decentring the Western perspective on knowledge: a reply to commentaries on ‘Building a cooperative child: evidence and lessons cross-culturally’ by Tanya Broesch and Erin Robbins","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Discourse","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Cultural knowledge; Psychology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06450200393729129,"score_gpt":0.3973585444825702,"score_spread":0.3328565405452789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388786092","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027378922,0.0011032259,0.00008575698,0.9924656,0.0052872715,0.0000032312348,0.000018050023,0.0000067009723,0.0007563413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008087936,0.0011931077,0.00017082371,0.98072815,0.007202301,0.00003899266,0.00001797931,0.000053596046,0.0025071271],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9758403,0.012551934,0.0023928888,0.002964834,0.00442633,0.0018237528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8636559,0.10938064,0.005295889,0.0031748086,0.013860747,0.004632077],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027504278,0.0016520582,0.0019646569,0.0015134593,0.014446929,0.009744107,0.007349593,0.057341587,0.007140334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10702095,0.0014687286,0.0015226434,0.003530754,0.033467446,0.020957705,0.009231007,0.08890426,0.0032329515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043999757,0.000009285041,0.0002028619,0.00018346473,0.000014824384,0.00048428983,0.025690166,0.000035873836,0.00014016473,0.014300832,0.9563229,0.0025715157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048715592,0.000033674703,0.0016028184,0.0015819182,0.00003967755,0.0005792937,0.05131027,0.00013862211,0.00049338106,0.016176142,0.9278159,0.00017954574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056687616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06376606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9855531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01034112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010914382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14545828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388940084","doi":"10.32920/24624669","title":"Armchair Evaluative Knowledge and Sentimental Perceptualism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Social knowledge; Epistemology; Social psychology; Empirical research; Empirical evidence; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2161068861106995,"score_gpt":0.3675215643998273,"score_spread":0.1514146782891278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388940084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13423839,0.0017649514,0.062261287,0.0368683,0.00029121008,0.0000402808,0.00011481719,0.00013030235,0.76429045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924551,0.00030100474,0.0021047543,0.00067513064,0.00007172435,0.000016268405,0.000022044554,0.000029600493,0.004324365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976217,0.0013633874,0.00006870697,0.00033438148,0.0003923621,0.00021942641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752504,0.0011821078,0.0003696794,0.00037915882,0.0003993415,0.00014468528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027731275,0.0002660869,0.0002494812,0.00065151503,0.0018556815,0.004715177,0.000486515,0.0013824083,0.0058329585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006037673,0.00021050479,0.00034207111,0.00051631243,0.018587036,0.0068581174,0.0030226705,0.0025271669,0.00047529896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011707185,0.0000098157625,0.00031701557,0.00003453841,0.0000058496953,0.00006404706,0.004898934,0.00015539446,0.00025559033,0.98809797,0.0012761371,0.004873103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061845267,0.000006783208,0.00097136444,0.000034522727,0.0000050850267,0.00005368188,0.0026840854,0.0005544303,0.0001933465,0.98235786,0.013125012,0.0000077037885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014471787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009599248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058329585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002375252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007284533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01951325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388946646","doi":"10.32920/24624669.v1","title":"Armchair Evaluative Knowledge and Sentimental Perceptualism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Empirical research; Empirical evidence; Social knowledge; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2161068861106995,"score_gpt":0.3675215643998273,"score_spread":0.1514146782891278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388946646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13423839,0.0017649514,0.062261287,0.0368683,0.00029121008,0.0000402808,0.00011481719,0.00013030235,0.76429045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924551,0.00030100474,0.0021047543,0.00067513064,0.00007172435,0.000016268405,0.000022044554,0.000029600493,0.004324365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976217,0.0013633874,0.00006870697,0.00033438148,0.0003923621,0.00021942641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752504,0.0011821078,0.0003696794,0.00037915882,0.0003993415,0.00014468528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027731275,0.0002660869,0.0002494812,0.00065151503,0.0018556815,0.004715177,0.000486515,0.0013824083,0.0058329585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006037673,0.00021050479,0.00034207111,0.00051631243,0.018587036,0.0068581174,0.0030226705,0.0025271669,0.00047529896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011707185,0.0000098157625,0.00031701557,0.00003453841,0.0000058496953,0.00006404706,0.004898934,0.00015539446,0.00025559033,0.98809797,0.0012761371,0.004873103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061845267,0.000006783208,0.00097136444,0.000034522727,0.0000050850267,0.00005368188,0.0026840854,0.0005544303,0.0001933465,0.98235786,0.013125012,0.0000077037885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014471787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009599248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058329585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002375252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007284533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01951325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388976940","doi":"10.1017/epi.2023.57","title":"Echo Chambers and Friendship","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Echo (communications protocol); Friendship; Individualism; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.09795813894547933,"score_gpt":0.27666603838623116,"score_spread":0.17870789944075183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388976940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33846077,0.0036539629,0.02544716,0.03033529,0.0007530081,0.00004284833,0.000050429586,0.00010713068,0.60114944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957411,0.0001630829,0.0004580635,0.00044609184,0.00006871186,0.000007036026,0.000003967129,0.0000115644925,0.0031003265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934214,0.004312884,0.00016360823,0.000597119,0.00087392516,0.0006309934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898878,0.004979554,0.0016515041,0.0014418351,0.001079688,0.0009596136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046593607,0.00031982257,0.00033690783,0.0011528257,0.0069439895,0.006276983,0.00077638804,0.0026349763,0.0068222554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012086462,0.00025315685,0.00025900855,0.0007902842,0.03090484,0.007663365,0.006447494,0.0030518365,0.00063388865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002605507,0.00001563132,0.0018819447,0.00003553279,0.00001871859,0.00024078587,0.034213684,0.00012786286,0.00032059549,0.95609564,0.0017006388,0.005322919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035011315,0.00009629962,0.005143975,0.00026541826,0.00006175254,0.0008922612,0.052460205,0.00094518793,0.0013614256,0.77958685,0.15909368,0.000057946894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016606743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014465022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069439895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018281692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091754424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024641335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389001647","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04389-8","title":"A theory of advice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Absurdity; Extant taxon; Philosophy of language; Quality (philosophy); Agency (philosophy); Metaphysics; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08212697711355707,"score_gpt":0.27984905143614147,"score_spread":0.1977220743225844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389001647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066330456,0.003367265,0.13905373,0.12855749,0.001614872,0.00021494142,0.00025663959,0.00020506998,0.72009695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72583836,0.0033761647,0.12132455,0.016620066,0.0013363239,0.00068211526,0.00031344118,0.00041863337,0.13009034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818778,0.011326525,0.0007082556,0.0021337818,0.0029953932,0.00095828716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96278876,0.026156886,0.0012308307,0.004025126,0.0047712335,0.0010272145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015921656,0.000830948,0.000870598,0.004348522,0.0074690236,0.013876719,0.0030100243,0.009103583,0.03119046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050997496,0.00069786614,0.00094874244,0.0029399332,0.025721934,0.016237652,0.0043247375,0.0069686705,0.0038767958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004360859,0.0000068465415,0.00004535175,0.00002651517,0.0000025259953,0.000013486712,0.00092830654,0.00014559123,0.0000134045695,0.99243814,0.003089011,0.0032865424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017866254,0.0000066396474,0.000047987396,0.00017338191,0.000006168856,0.000022760027,0.0010132272,0.0007581715,0.000056144643,0.92287296,0.07501844,0.0000062424356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006618894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007575438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03119046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009309226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014356646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10434246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389397857","doi":"10.1017/can.2023.36","title":"On the Practical Significance of Irrelevant Factors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Scarborough; University of Toronto","keywords":"Worry; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Gray (unit); Subject (documents); Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.1705623482703091,"score_gpt":0.2948098967463087,"score_spread":0.12424754847599959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389397857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1609943,0.0039584353,0.24407955,0.14022939,0.0011608647,0.00021702622,0.00010508844,0.0002990438,0.44895634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98224545,0.00060825393,0.008790343,0.0029835133,0.00022887532,0.000054249027,0.00001726977,0.00006493582,0.005007074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9761939,0.015315203,0.00063057686,0.0022404061,0.0040826285,0.0015372197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90465283,0.07674604,0.0033618992,0.007823202,0.005693759,0.0017221986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024393203,0.00083391694,0.0010455413,0.0017779379,0.005675096,0.007690336,0.002201509,0.005235006,0.007160537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08012619,0.00058570487,0.0007385422,0.0009306113,0.05803583,0.012155177,0.008581302,0.009330534,0.0007050081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042098778,0.000021636666,0.00057586434,0.00005921138,0.000013559185,0.00036425274,0.0036808387,0.0008088024,0.00023846627,0.9869436,0.0016046271,0.0056469627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009910621,0.000010454553,0.00016710846,0.000068552465,0.000014660224,0.000069436384,0.0013452068,0.0009855366,0.00032227128,0.9884312,0.008562892,0.000012691275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043381494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003797375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024393203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054735197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004447989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12900513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390018218","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4671269","title":"Increased Attention Decreases the Convincingness of Belief-Confirming Evidence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.1022727919626587,"score_gpt":0.3067043497290412,"score_spread":0.2044315577663825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390018218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88790363,0.0027169236,0.029642476,0.02083538,0.0007421085,0.00024805282,0.0004040866,0.0011061667,0.05640116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98589826,0.00046504155,0.0073535503,0.0027255977,0.0003805348,0.00008413827,0.00015686691,0.00020515807,0.002730895],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822061,0.008535169,0.0012647323,0.0027060038,0.0041259034,0.0011620144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39770737,0.51930046,0.036666706,0.026916565,0.011200613,0.008208357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016669448,0.00070611114,0.0014131381,0.001979663,0.00082478154,0.004115425,0.0017359358,0.00599797,0.02582567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28420392,0.0008392312,0.00066787156,0.0009107409,0.0019252037,0.0030214824,0.0029382398,0.004882597,0.002689218],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018466996,0.008481773,0.14936054,0.005378578,0.0025375017,0.0020897936,0.006688647,0.0061142156,0.18587609,0.041684538,0.02913029,0.544191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044425824,0.011695324,0.4829448,0.0015372889,0.004703108,0.0044886167,0.005178435,0.03516605,0.08735453,0.32307222,0.03894514,0.00047192042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012451231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012046689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02582567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013660451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015622644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088157535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390635778","doi":"10.1007/s11098-023-02088-1","title":"Epistemic blame as relationship modification: reply to Smartt","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Blame; Skepticism; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.31095522275474585,"score_gpt":0.3889637598222555,"score_spread":0.07800853706750965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390635778","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00208049,0.0013452274,0.00181946,0.97745204,0.0019068595,0.000011737663,0.000038113936,0.000024457908,0.015321558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16876128,0.0024175192,0.0022342221,0.7997854,0.013573508,0.00014495118,0.00004080021,0.00018389421,0.012858433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930606,0.002920975,0.00044033641,0.001824165,0.001151667,0.00060224946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9532703,0.03831543,0.0017155762,0.0027864191,0.003070479,0.0008417234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013826955,0.00073049916,0.0020610364,0.0016030334,0.0068296646,0.006894746,0.004597114,0.04911139,0.008761069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061874397,0.00087672914,0.0013765057,0.0021007713,0.039984584,0.021565653,0.0071590496,0.049179718,0.0033276079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086148786,0.000024602725,0.00026585773,0.00008845886,0.000030581963,0.00042212344,0.0057011596,0.00020808968,0.00011253711,0.8001713,0.18737835,0.005510726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095004965,0.000013497424,0.0003854981,0.00025153425,0.000031537023,0.00039197496,0.003280525,0.0007794334,0.00032830663,0.87165266,0.122724146,0.00006588061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007132672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005265006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04911139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075814235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055028456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07312477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390720424","doi":"10.1017/9781108779968.004","title":"A Philosophically Informed Virtue Science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemic virtue; Epistemology; Generality; Aside; Philosophical methodology; Philosophy of science; Philosophical theory; Set (abstract data type); Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06155738962334452,"score_gpt":0.23521027692120794,"score_spread":0.17365288729786343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390720424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00843225,0.022507785,0.04670977,0.14742242,0.0027744411,0.00004809215,0.00011109545,0.000085684565,0.77190846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70427865,0.021876287,0.05109172,0.051424526,0.0047034137,0.00032822235,0.00019272743,0.00023145693,0.16587299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975284,0.0014279729,0.000063541134,0.00019225951,0.000637575,0.00015033854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981646,0.0011474589,0.00006921973,0.00021309755,0.00024101653,0.00016452036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047902227,0.00038489685,0.000574615,0.0012446049,0.0030384215,0.0045071,0.0008994666,0.0034986972,0.0075459443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036351837,0.00030293385,0.00044802658,0.00079130713,0.02378017,0.00788655,0.003983734,0.00735332,0.0018711399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014397468,0.000005633902,0.000028797464,0.000017375749,6.794607e-7,0.0000090882495,0.00037942317,0.00006645324,0.000028145318,0.994335,0.0026733002,0.0024546022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017117409,0.0000031481363,0.0000511692,0.00005041771,5.975483e-7,0.00001759488,0.00022364693,0.00019312878,0.000031751504,0.9471967,0.052227814,0.0000022994134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010520647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016163274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075459443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003512635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032613238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025486052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390802113","doi":"10.1515/9780773585539-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill-Queen's University Press","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.02910638672481102,"score_gpt":0.22160526653351245,"score_spread":0.19249887980870142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390802113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027822706,0.0008978719,0.00030591292,0.0024313913,0.0023742642,0.000025976846,0.00086919515,0.00043562005,0.9923815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00087828765,0.0005772013,0.00015218537,0.001113797,0.00028940034,0.000011966858,0.00043818608,0.0001433312,0.99639577],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992255,0.0000459568,0.000031201234,0.00021482867,0.0003753266,0.00010722024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898046,0.00018465861,0.000054922097,0.00014584744,0.00032869173,0.0003054452],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043336948,0.0009470495,0.0009052835,0.0011786316,0.0020290667,0.008587812,0.001259915,0.0039782696,0.9046787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026144038,0.00036086602,0.000630494,0.0013043544,0.0010332213,0.0033030156,0.0023132502,0.0022466218,0.8974628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041019743,0.000031503674,0.00026821726,0.00023651766,0.000004701361,0.00011609262,0.00010617495,0.000040596136,0.00056731096,0.008990248,0.8395151,0.15008251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034605644,0.0000055938494,0.00019034457,0.00007543334,0.0000010036673,0.000048084392,0.00006635551,0.000021277132,0.00007275068,0.0008955287,0.9986179,0.0000023233551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002004613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048387325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0953213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012328071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016416078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13596416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390820159","doi":"10.5430/wjel.v14n2p166","title":"A Philosophical Investigation of the Context Sensitivity of Know: Contextualism versus Semantic Minimalism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Journal of English Language","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Southwest University","keywords":"Contextualism; Minimalism (technical communication); Inference; Context (archaeology); Hierarchy; Epistemology; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Political science; History; Law; Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.04180750912442059,"score_gpt":0.2737510228664704,"score_spread":0.2319435137420498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390820159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20252301,0.013816336,0.3081305,0.094077356,0.00062458037,0.000111394096,0.00024157131,0.00018326241,0.38029197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827137,0.0011536088,0.012259542,0.0015272903,0.00030711424,0.00005882461,0.000033928583,0.00005847626,0.0018875505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476904,0.0033483298,0.00016299798,0.0007153813,0.0006751357,0.00032911805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915877,0.006513088,0.00046564365,0.0006372811,0.0005239928,0.00027233534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005774741,0.0005266031,0.0008284982,0.0019524149,0.0032407532,0.0038269858,0.0014245347,0.0025690943,0.0030694737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008028439,0.0006745035,0.0011214697,0.00127481,0.030884618,0.014475941,0.0047736363,0.0057639075,0.00027571252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009326588,0.000004166131,0.00008376497,0.00002828102,0.000004940792,0.000025635416,0.0013155504,0.00013992384,0.00014211512,0.9972671,0.00011007223,0.0008690286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006555684,0.000008002557,0.00016012443,0.000026376714,0.0000070942015,0.000029113697,0.0005759446,0.0004027609,0.0001502938,0.9958268,0.0028014972,0.0000054378193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021532234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017897502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005774741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042649787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016930738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030944765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391354115","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04445-3","title":"Don’t get it wrong! On understanding and its negative phenomena","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Philosophy of language; Epistemology; Explanatory power; Metaphysics; Phenomenology (philosophy); Relation (database); Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.1547436171822127,"score_gpt":0.29751868112655777,"score_spread":0.14277506394434508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391354115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16740756,0.01589381,0.109020725,0.30955884,0.0021357783,0.000070539456,0.00023082734,0.00028752073,0.39539447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865709,0.0018748525,0.0043271906,0.0031837902,0.00027981732,0.000043991753,0.000057454086,0.000092900795,0.0035690833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98359805,0.011433649,0.0004724517,0.001136179,0.0026957612,0.00066396303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9303147,0.055351038,0.0040710825,0.0050290814,0.0044857524,0.0007482338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01664756,0.000638215,0.00079772476,0.0028901554,0.0037845334,0.0068282024,0.00163986,0.0051324842,0.0058269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04660108,0.00035997713,0.0006557885,0.0016652715,0.05433869,0.022564204,0.006004503,0.0061257794,0.000850695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021812235,0.000008787016,0.000519189,0.0001381458,0.000010213512,0.000113464,0.01903966,0.00029214914,0.00011527388,0.97307265,0.0019557856,0.00471287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000913579,0.000016397207,0.00043304585,0.00049946934,0.000016606877,0.0001912491,0.011182783,0.000876693,0.00048764265,0.94783866,0.03842756,0.000020779273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012259037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007574853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01664756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003869494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002007348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08804178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391639765","doi":"10.3998/ergo.5640","title":"Correction Notice for \"Epistemic Exploitation\" by Nora Berenstain (&lt;i&gt;Ergo&lt;/i&gt;, 2016, Vol. 3)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0967997716446078,"score_gpt":0.3566896205713321,"score_spread":0.2598898489267243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391639765","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027782362,0.0010196168,0.0012271388,0.14253494,0.8411817,0.00004373525,0.0016771408,0.0012275889,0.010810223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031005107,0.005559475,0.0066091553,0.14168338,0.23919539,0.0006060594,0.0038421135,0.0063626585,0.56513673],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98804957,0.0012463728,0.0014883396,0.0014153187,0.006941091,0.0008593819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92664963,0.018209295,0.004052266,0.0051464867,0.043574944,0.00236742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061152326,0.0020976448,0.0018195082,0.0036025192,0.009367188,0.009052411,0.003902782,0.011818131,0.103126265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.099777184,0.0011743881,0.001296736,0.0034684022,0.0054928395,0.004460047,0.0048404043,0.015160486,0.07084299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009108908,0.0000024335927,0.000024000426,0.00004214609,0.0000018087202,0.000054073982,0.00010616676,0.000011037254,0.000017558887,0.0013161959,0.9961953,0.002220134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014233955,0.000008130445,0.00033401634,0.00024939797,0.0000079206675,0.0001850246,0.00026906573,0.00012715452,0.00016319864,0.0015949138,0.99701524,0.000031724696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033062622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024863008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103126265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008162547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011139938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34499168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391759162","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-46367-9_10","title":"Reconstruction from Ultimate Scepticism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave companions.","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0723496848527052,"score_gpt":0.25737604629723915,"score_spread":0.18502636144453394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391759162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016749298,0.0029084675,0.052677196,0.038591374,0.0011338294,0.00005300543,0.00027313197,0.00020285137,0.8874109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8617258,0.0018941663,0.0127632925,0.0048818034,0.00064858067,0.000116572686,0.0003603016,0.00041906952,0.11719035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976252,0.0012222539,0.00007841837,0.0003485788,0.00046962217,0.00025594325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645364,0.0011875362,0.00016110764,0.001094091,0.0009166135,0.00018717101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030024182,0.0005386719,0.00044383042,0.001250007,0.0035386682,0.006747556,0.0017329463,0.0027963428,0.0156971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011941778,0.00035476225,0.00040384752,0.0008233061,0.027009163,0.0080977855,0.0039868457,0.006011603,0.004105205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009610767,0.0000042120846,0.000045256158,0.000014251731,0.0000019213046,0.00006843454,0.0012653795,0.00008590109,0.000029166702,0.99043417,0.004669787,0.0033717975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065627833,0.000005313072,0.000077832,0.00008052328,0.0000023647005,0.00009371255,0.0017677709,0.000380044,0.0001634284,0.9361038,0.06131335,0.0000052252763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026110415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027923323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0156971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038435003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025846225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05251199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391907095","doi":"10.56526/10451/60012","title":"A self-descriptionist theory of knowledge","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kairos","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Self-knowledge; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08286822144446326,"score_gpt":0.2710002206976556,"score_spread":0.18813199925319235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391907095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028614506,0.0035332101,0.37448454,0.032255225,0.0004842162,0.00012093002,0.0003495057,0.00018501752,0.5599729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9087617,0.0013430836,0.056317803,0.0014470685,0.00042489564,0.00024926473,0.0002153601,0.000101568665,0.031139255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611855,0.0019928028,0.00021229843,0.00053102226,0.0008349601,0.0003104209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953275,0.0024680735,0.0003179148,0.000956139,0.00064549944,0.00028493677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004652947,0.00052254525,0.00094667147,0.0033237261,0.003568211,0.0086155115,0.0027465825,0.003025268,0.0075870617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065325373,0.0005786469,0.001421795,0.0021686172,0.02705523,0.019942041,0.0040139537,0.0041051367,0.0011386089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014550941,0.000002201716,0.00001717894,0.0000070057927,0.0000011457909,0.00000500032,0.00018156305,0.0000928574,0.000007714078,0.99907947,0.00014489044,0.00045956572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044707235,0.0000020136338,0.000023658451,0.000011885976,0.0000018972725,0.000012527147,0.0001119013,0.00056940934,0.000023431574,0.99529856,0.0039373958,0.000002829177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036104873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027008564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0086155115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060364227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004290715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043797493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392292889","doi":"10.1017/epi.2024.6","title":"Epistemic Complicity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Wrongdoing; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Philosophy; Collective responsibility; Sociology; Political science; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.14379891357584362,"score_gpt":0.29538249379222126,"score_spread":0.15158358021637763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392292889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15936056,0.00151602,0.23810531,0.024095984,0.00061043684,0.00019406258,0.00019111115,0.00047848807,0.575448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880228,0.00019214992,0.0037881823,0.0007238313,0.00016328871,0.00004455924,0.00004367364,0.00004176264,0.0069797337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99043906,0.00426984,0.0005768348,0.0015461085,0.0021467165,0.0010213804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97873986,0.012159135,0.0019083943,0.003783781,0.0027570128,0.00065177947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069412016,0.0006488211,0.00067608996,0.0017371154,0.0039096205,0.005405464,0.0014001402,0.0029582304,0.0058753844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024088142,0.00040666515,0.0011211626,0.0010148333,0.02161018,0.008259219,0.0092194695,0.0049089515,0.00056456844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001618238,0.000008232355,0.0004995188,0.000036676996,0.00001080553,0.00031505112,0.0026366962,0.00048783442,0.0002288071,0.992219,0.0006992878,0.0028418736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009552489,0.000010978492,0.00024193859,0.000053126325,0.000016222963,0.00025371657,0.0009621693,0.0015104082,0.0005709647,0.98050344,0.015853373,0.000014082392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017895356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010912068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069412016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038001882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021007333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03670901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392672923","doi":"10.1086/728629","title":":<i>Bias: A Philosophical Study</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.32545378093771543,"score_gpt":0.3729506229512032,"score_spread":0.04749684201348775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392672923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05665908,0.026101947,0.055268336,0.7112883,0.0035912097,0.00022230226,0.000285304,0.000099174635,0.14648436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9031739,0.0063128225,0.01470128,0.06342255,0.0032432838,0.0004170601,0.00012080625,0.0002110297,0.008397333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95388556,0.03358868,0.0015016365,0.0029405635,0.0068208934,0.0012626399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82529354,0.14922832,0.0076053306,0.0067498866,0.009801574,0.0013212649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048219535,0.00054764684,0.0010838474,0.0042973105,0.008043237,0.017196339,0.0032166385,0.010340799,0.0076847523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100738145,0.00042950583,0.00080992025,0.006629575,0.0671899,0.030022059,0.0072154286,0.008159381,0.0010130729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020429996,0.00001465828,0.0015215789,0.00025517933,0.00002198635,0.00007181955,0.017869512,0.000056321405,0.00008751761,0.9610391,0.011191229,0.0078505995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003177887,0.000024054245,0.0019119901,0.0016362558,0.00005204063,0.0005168765,0.0388073,0.0006586902,0.0005256524,0.88068897,0.07511093,0.000035564655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005669002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004524616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048219535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007919615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010440345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25501233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392782479","doi":"10.1080/00048402.2024.2310193","title":"Ambiguity Tests, Polysemy, and Copredication","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Polysemy; Ambiguity; Epistemology; Prima facie; Causation; Argument (complex analysis); Term (time); Vagueness; Philosophy; Phenomenon; Linguistics; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of language; Psychology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.06406636689470722,"score_gpt":0.2962612529781869,"score_spread":0.23219488608347966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392782479","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25059524,0.0076359455,0.48033544,0.018245012,0.0011309626,0.00049973966,0.0013214602,0.00079183636,0.23944433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592452,0.0007669003,0.0346312,0.0010072355,0.00041912045,0.00020030244,0.00027688305,0.00015500745,0.0032980687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912689,0.0035110028,0.0010200012,0.0014379605,0.0022677744,0.0004943211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.950707,0.030455047,0.005443173,0.005422772,0.006291998,0.0016799893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011153887,0.0012811432,0.0012240666,0.0063951407,0.003667085,0.0044105486,0.0018047617,0.0027339412,0.008132333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05124353,0.0007550742,0.0017029324,0.004348049,0.032760754,0.020886196,0.006467864,0.005743558,0.0006835972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006930659,0.000015046388,0.0015395685,0.00013915788,0.00002609127,0.00025139336,0.0020848715,0.00029851703,0.00037037669,0.98240924,0.001039241,0.011757269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015554402,0.000029728491,0.0015664567,0.00007061038,0.000016856437,0.0002870289,0.0007210788,0.0014160869,0.0005544921,0.9913668,0.003916336,0.000038834987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023070376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016029213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011153887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027771587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016979261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058988094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392877232","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i1.8183","title":"The Distinctiveness Problem of Analogical Arguments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; Sun Yat-sen University","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Analogical reasoning; Epistemology; Psychology; Analogy; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.058694777136298205,"score_gpt":0.28215423052417177,"score_spread":0.22345945338787357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392877232","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08186772,0.002138843,0.5967746,0.03672646,0.0007898219,0.0002573082,0.00021028728,0.00043480739,0.28080022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9428789,0.00047542792,0.04783265,0.0020250017,0.00050942966,0.00020917402,0.00008039742,0.00009959895,0.005889464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830936,0.006580854,0.0010727003,0.003110673,0.005378858,0.00076330936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9624759,0.021984097,0.0021296593,0.009078137,0.003479894,0.0008522424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018630099,0.00057980703,0.0014731257,0.0030147387,0.0029923609,0.0059475554,0.0035782582,0.004504553,0.0074875616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04237692,0.0008086652,0.0019647689,0.001670103,0.027176505,0.01717729,0.008550476,0.010077411,0.0008578692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007172745,0.000004655063,0.000072525596,0.000018158133,0.000006727833,0.000020983825,0.00021369806,0.00008618305,0.00008060155,0.9972995,0.00019773586,0.0019919723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015077549,0.000008182329,0.00006993277,0.000014167762,0.0000074604122,0.00006292566,0.00008762504,0.0005051702,0.00014136995,0.9963064,0.002777177,0.000004386708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055034296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038208003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018630099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037278417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002256126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0985266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392877428","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i1.8222","title":"What Makes an Argument Strong?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09379951201748599,"score_gpt":0.3052495666163226,"score_spread":0.2114500545988366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392877428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03326727,0.008474185,0.045758896,0.30662566,0.01088016,0.00023462863,0.00024313132,0.00028191225,0.59423417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90011567,0.005259423,0.029844219,0.024644874,0.006955245,0.0003166108,0.0003092423,0.00033317157,0.032221653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754098,0.012420134,0.0012582649,0.0032186615,0.0061518024,0.0015413439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95036674,0.03192464,0.0041841757,0.0027579255,0.008278722,0.002487855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020709418,0.0010700633,0.0014388579,0.0033270372,0.004537249,0.0131175,0.0017597986,0.008610702,0.013983672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056022245,0.0006553771,0.0012269989,0.0014126806,0.014235568,0.014720948,0.0043318826,0.0051811673,0.0061827595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013572173,0.00007690491,0.002109897,0.0007931356,0.00022187586,0.0011097741,0.0075509734,0.00021090591,0.0014419691,0.93485475,0.02355822,0.027935874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007174012,0.00006321969,0.0014570451,0.0012612421,0.00018348102,0.0006228395,0.007862418,0.0007422264,0.0012952585,0.7884036,0.19798581,0.000051041203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007237911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013294163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020709418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034944091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003992151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10952312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392927328","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2307336","title":"Reorienting Clifford’s evidentialism: returning to social trust","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11515375989045752,"score_gpt":0.2998163492941909,"score_spread":0.18466258940373337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392927328","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061776903,0.012121827,0.1984451,0.4051349,0.0025367418,0.00009469168,0.00008524816,0.0001063952,0.31969827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962811,0.0018461073,0.015057851,0.00901805,0.000913124,0.00007354735,0.000017527165,0.000095246345,0.010167525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846624,0.010270603,0.0005812885,0.0012123287,0.0024086663,0.00086468545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736649,0.01894509,0.0014661489,0.0025526115,0.0027427252,0.00062847737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018647902,0.00052103354,0.00087140844,0.0019829113,0.005126525,0.011568041,0.0025846434,0.0069375806,0.0026061013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035281043,0.00050866,0.0008253433,0.0015553329,0.05708604,0.02069571,0.006508431,0.011455793,0.00048017383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035358519,0.0000035920064,0.0000399349,0.000012625909,0.0000019673264,0.00004188352,0.003429969,0.00008173591,0.000018473875,0.99402964,0.0007851738,0.0015515803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043576483,0.0000033020742,0.000043876422,0.000039662867,0.0000022333788,0.000022923758,0.0008849578,0.000370741,0.00005521231,0.9872028,0.01136362,0.000006365934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009344296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006929162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018647902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010340067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048729638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09862065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393031669","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4735851","title":"A.I. and the Nature of Disagreement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.013432177817925247,"score_gpt":0.2514620363788881,"score_spread":0.23802985856096284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393031669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062662885,0.0039568217,0.068529576,0.09786735,0.0012022854,0.00024775436,0.00031304872,0.00016609806,0.76505417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841174,0.0005254307,0.0052664173,0.0037601474,0.00047733818,0.00023868946,0.000056449102,0.00004960037,0.005508502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.970842,0.016960582,0.001647667,0.0042793048,0.0042958385,0.0019745643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8689798,0.09637403,0.00881173,0.0132215405,0.009548281,0.0030646815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027773507,0.0004951252,0.0010996751,0.003126147,0.009584955,0.010864717,0.002349716,0.009674515,0.016494447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10069486,0.00050300057,0.00109543,0.002880633,0.032639377,0.018399524,0.005886722,0.008255259,0.0018304748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023887598,0.000007832677,0.0004259162,0.000035070796,0.000008139221,0.00004009992,0.0013755178,0.000073574345,0.000058816273,0.99311334,0.0018972298,0.0029405851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022389231,0.0000073582173,0.00029574553,0.000062638195,0.0000051163825,0.00006317,0.0011737933,0.0004891893,0.00006153085,0.99242496,0.0053872387,0.0000069488697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018280718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010702314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027773507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052467496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047612945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14688212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393347039","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-52585-8_10","title":"A Foundational Scepticism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1028139080989273,"score_gpt":0.27289003458483996,"score_spread":0.17007612648591264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393347039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0099234115,0.01302127,0.04774803,0.31231728,0.008266422,0.00009095293,0.0003302053,0.00022598224,0.60807633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6829101,0.008742551,0.02952037,0.11821955,0.01268627,0.00070201966,0.000319402,0.00044042137,0.14645945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931652,0.002891112,0.00022498099,0.0010180023,0.0023091326,0.0003915137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858504,0.008263217,0.0004338912,0.0019741785,0.002938988,0.0005393129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009526188,0.00055952586,0.00092871534,0.0024469364,0.0052329535,0.008691679,0.0028236464,0.0056173056,0.007880344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020714564,0.00039886922,0.0005430073,0.0013163051,0.05212798,0.010796752,0.0040205396,0.012152848,0.002170522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066809557,0.0000072173,0.000030210691,0.000017198634,0.0000031598381,0.000018105815,0.0006946909,0.000052952393,0.000018931492,0.98409075,0.012722545,0.0023375605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012986461,0.0000048178526,0.00007133256,0.00013259852,0.0000038597627,0.000048236616,0.00051480514,0.00031056567,0.000088863904,0.93216026,0.066644914,0.000006814455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005328916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041334853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009526188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006292645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055980813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050379932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394052408","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10373125","title":"Increased Attention Decreases the Convincingness of Belief-Confirming Evidence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.1374469288259309,"score_gpt":0.2957793859990915,"score_spread":0.15833245717316058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394052408","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001082219,0.0005464538,0.00022972579,0.00048959535,0.000080233156,0.000029886507,0.9955438,0.00038814283,0.0016099954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005492559,0.00022110675,0.0012538024,0.00040470093,0.000043826654,0.00016156735,0.9904779,0.000119796954,0.0018247346],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965,0.0012392331,0.0004261339,0.00093044294,0.00063304993,0.0002710889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719633,0.020218026,0.0019220597,0.003059468,0.002106052,0.00073121017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005322619,0.002045353,0.0015613508,0.0041007414,0.0009747317,0.0041423095,0.003673769,0.0051313937,0.08672282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051881634,0.00075303053,0.0025201591,0.0043425285,0.00088253064,0.0018765794,0.002437746,0.002185227,0.04160924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004598085,0.00006698451,0.007697245,0.0031606774,0.00030077863,0.000051157505,0.000054739925,0.0011497834,0.00020691263,0.00151987,0.97852325,0.006808838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004243084,0.0001455185,0.030577034,0.0030717594,0.0011674487,0.0004905884,0.00025862994,0.0073796543,0.0015568441,0.019230753,0.9317369,0.00014175239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025351616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06889367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08672282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020011931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030792316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29011673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843815","doi":"10.4000/aad.8119","title":"Michael A. Gilbert: Not arguing logically is not illogical: Other ways of communicating arguments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.126980649537492,"score_gpt":0.3387212657828483,"score_spread":0.21174061624535628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394843815","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007198845,0.04432809,0.048386104,0.758027,0.0060912766,0.0000634003,0.00010691371,0.00023745894,0.13556086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6530845,0.044273257,0.07577046,0.13216223,0.008115188,0.00039898595,0.00017378137,0.00066545646,0.08535617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990952,0.006679357,0.00023423025,0.0006750056,0.0012393545,0.00022001503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9727768,0.021480454,0.0011824247,0.00088483706,0.0025817603,0.001093926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008444034,0.0006661707,0.00064643833,0.0019810542,0.0052486816,0.009794224,0.0014212,0.0076766224,0.0085503515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03559825,0.00048068495,0.0005231318,0.0020130859,0.016638828,0.018688617,0.00297557,0.008518839,0.0027051214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047175272,0.000015027791,0.00023373606,0.00017062669,0.0000183202,0.00017520686,0.011160898,0.00017728635,0.00017130742,0.8921017,0.08199019,0.0137385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040752973,0.000017534005,0.00023650135,0.0004406304,0.000020499368,0.00037441458,0.0044310824,0.00078118726,0.00057691714,0.6133356,0.3796969,0.00004795819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005574657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005467586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009794224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003937692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030954736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044656813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394876917","doi":"10.5406/21521123.61.2.01","title":"Evidence and Emotions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Proposition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.09464240576296391,"score_gpt":0.3074725949150349,"score_spread":0.21283018915207103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394876917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083046824,0.018741932,0.041898035,0.16140285,0.0012573549,0.00006646581,0.00025059117,0.00006976101,0.69326615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863652,0.0025005578,0.0027612764,0.0029243736,0.00034123202,0.000034531015,0.000036281286,0.000016272003,0.0050202366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99312794,0.0047135903,0.00027135367,0.0005521858,0.0009799445,0.00035499394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732346,0.020853914,0.0018601937,0.0012654541,0.0021491332,0.00063669146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006116317,0.00032336742,0.00046004468,0.0016074429,0.0017041327,0.007602537,0.0009038101,0.005140945,0.010421879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030304221,0.00024375287,0.00036895295,0.0010102171,0.019043941,0.009190897,0.003373435,0.0039180135,0.0005410054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021752796,0.000014328128,0.0005229979,0.00009202956,0.000014203804,0.00013589495,0.0012649981,0.0002360594,0.00012050757,0.9905691,0.0013289433,0.0056791552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018460436,0.000013964628,0.0008492157,0.00026509422,0.000012119704,0.000105334926,0.0016560602,0.0004429516,0.00015428604,0.97365123,0.022818312,0.000012918249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009936459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008023572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010421879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002515459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012477237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034864664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395010243","doi":"10.1017/epi.2024.17","title":"Deep Agreements","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Business","score_opus":0.06704883959129587,"score_gpt":0.2843049394522583,"score_spread":0.21725609986096245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395010243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037877023,0.0037502532,0.32563692,0.04095119,0.001082969,0.00029076834,0.00031280375,0.00021169549,0.5898863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9382265,0.001364441,0.029666156,0.0044367537,0.0005070731,0.00033678094,0.0001681888,0.00012425082,0.02516992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9588355,0.02317036,0.002157757,0.005752606,0.007619551,0.002464135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9428463,0.031873606,0.0046646837,0.011152605,0.007150738,0.0023120537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02356158,0.0006890601,0.0012564068,0.0022249615,0.006160668,0.012044384,0.002412391,0.005919343,0.012568978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04853766,0.0005206636,0.0010848101,0.002130993,0.039187834,0.015397939,0.01241275,0.0070444406,0.0022169382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049822224,0.0000038169505,0.00013160094,0.000033433225,0.00000594782,0.000024095429,0.001540636,0.0001678076,0.000060905793,0.9948409,0.00069528905,0.0024906325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033466583,0.0000068187173,0.00008278325,0.00007300596,0.000004044617,0.00002952164,0.00074647635,0.00039173372,0.0001047275,0.97717196,0.021378644,0.0000068989884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013493528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009143139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02356158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004568852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00506721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12460703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396628435","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-443-13829-4.00009-x","title":"The fundamental problem","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04307051387976071,"score_gpt":0.25265588186852367,"score_spread":0.20958536798876296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396628435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042258017,0.009559097,0.018143943,0.14686365,0.0035290355,0.000041863434,0.00028299258,0.00012230339,0.8172315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40132245,0.012580689,0.02876722,0.08263624,0.010996684,0.0006738769,0.0007085416,0.0005445371,0.4617698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972914,0.00084083836,0.00009535278,0.0009180803,0.0005767672,0.0002776572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969999,0.001377705,0.00013861546,0.00072112784,0.0005701518,0.00019249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036488113,0.00064233004,0.0011341496,0.0011869645,0.004588812,0.006527418,0.0016684495,0.0071154432,0.038707286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0100045595,0.0004774259,0.0006751479,0.0008239991,0.016126212,0.012405749,0.003836511,0.011351943,0.008966609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003918476,0.0000054512648,0.000023123739,0.000014337975,0.0000016656635,0.000005762616,0.00010438677,0.000023784138,0.000014483818,0.98601717,0.011158405,0.0026275988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007153538,0.0000029019404,0.000039723025,0.00004386568,0.0000017925969,0.00003464337,0.00010277334,0.00008561986,0.00003196386,0.92381287,0.07583323,0.0000034852521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027689228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025256898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038707286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038057957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003245061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12948877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396791295","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/34rza","title":"Meta-judgment: Meta-theories and beliefs about good judgment across societies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Meta-analysis; Clinical judgment; Epistemology; Social psychology; Metatheory; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.1800362454699678,"score_gpt":0.32422441242751204,"score_spread":0.14418816695754424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396791295","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08385378,0.023455508,0.74305415,0.023840168,0.000640275,0.00028013028,0.0008412299,0.0006844874,0.12335027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87541294,0.0044180797,0.11351268,0.002419259,0.0005478248,0.0002805649,0.000583734,0.0002189199,0.0026059523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795574,0.010654123,0.0015489353,0.0034390874,0.0040305443,0.000769885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8929484,0.06557124,0.011491122,0.019874917,0.008149999,0.001964357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029759089,0.0012824105,0.0017836194,0.00882545,0.002513391,0.018041804,0.0039962903,0.0033725137,0.0049185203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08514112,0.00096479716,0.0023610834,0.0057002963,0.02512291,0.029346311,0.006488039,0.0054260655,0.0009083473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056969107,0.00004189972,0.0068343445,0.0006348848,0.00035616022,0.00022293441,0.014361006,0.0026833832,0.0005363522,0.940108,0.0018436713,0.03232043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007783303,0.000020558555,0.0020930178,0.00045247763,0.00007510897,0.00017948163,0.0014508097,0.0024407255,0.00033365708,0.9837373,0.009170278,0.00003892041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028516473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020077054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029759089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051862258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037088452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15738302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397012953","doi":"10.1007/s11153-024-09914-4","title":"Book symposium: Patrick Todd, The open future: why future contingents are all false. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021. 224 pp. $80.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of religion; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.05382649079618494,"score_gpt":0.2841327138678885,"score_spread":0.23030622307170356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397012953","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037920533,0.7457647,0.0011182281,0.1697604,0.026611643,0.000034946144,0.00074536284,0.00020628053,0.05537935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016353661,0.5087633,0.0025064663,0.041442934,0.02718566,0.00011419989,0.0009453235,0.00040926947,0.40227908],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951434,0.000123803,0.000025934412,0.00007895881,0.0002108862,0.000046054905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985061,0.0006610509,0.00010351547,0.000043975193,0.0004913337,0.00019395698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011256293,0.0017903714,0.0012829736,0.0021858707,0.0024246075,0.0037400688,0.0015119029,0.003789311,0.07544963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00310303,0.0012012601,0.0006966926,0.0025110943,0.0025252805,0.008041046,0.0017513919,0.004844122,0.033808168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010207159,0.0000045230536,0.00003069909,0.00009349101,0.0000038670614,0.000019236704,0.00013461422,0.000027096426,0.00002302185,0.002378188,0.9877908,0.009484237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010780979,0.0000047391745,0.000321309,0.0005495995,0.000009630224,0.00011557586,0.00047134783,0.000045368022,0.00004725894,0.005564621,0.9928463,0.000013431458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017861666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03909323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07544963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026319744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035384812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25240415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397023067","doi":"10.1038/d41586-024-01478-7","title":"Daniel Dennett obituary: ‘New atheism’ philosopher who sparked debate on consciousness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Atheism; Consciousness; Philosophy; Obituary; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.03862181159439163,"score_gpt":0.2777593416201284,"score_spread":0.23913753002573676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397023067","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015638623,0.011787819,0.0005444802,0.8177766,0.1639968,0.0000064254978,0.000052011823,0.000041109324,0.0056383465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010504503,0.006155507,0.0006849358,0.75522655,0.1708391,0.00006149863,0.000057845496,0.00029622696,0.05617381],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912628,0.0035739488,0.0005802402,0.0014713668,0.002517746,0.00059390336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810496,0.012600649,0.0009413517,0.0008204753,0.0034946918,0.0010931843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007298627,0.0014388552,0.0018699754,0.0019481778,0.010511634,0.012635046,0.0026997342,0.01928181,0.006240058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044553254,0.00076877995,0.00088874955,0.001400607,0.016670212,0.011700529,0.005724596,0.039857402,0.0048979633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012859597,0.0000071332797,0.000029882016,0.00003656911,0.0000048742913,0.000030944684,0.00039266018,0.000028171587,0.000019027757,0.029556181,0.96848404,0.0013976059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011996087,0.000005085929,0.00015892362,0.00024308485,0.0000066521675,0.000052425545,0.0006348836,0.00008642711,0.0001402718,0.032934517,0.9656929,0.000032861804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017580127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02800767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01928181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063205548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006022905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04585904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398254997","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192896278.001.0001","title":"The Fundamentals of Reasons","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.07454060258095942,"score_gpt":0.2791117726853412,"score_spread":0.2045711701043818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398254997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031468214,0.012435895,0.069923446,0.027718535,0.001532234,0.000100783014,0.00017293113,0.00015599221,0.8848133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5473752,0.019529378,0.067208566,0.0115181,0.0027214687,0.0006864565,0.00046835083,0.00040445966,0.35008803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996682,0.0016123841,0.00013851102,0.00038818602,0.0008952659,0.00028364838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649745,0.0023894869,0.00016156987,0.0002909581,0.0005235617,0.00013705903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032320786,0.00069195684,0.0005139653,0.0015918245,0.0026513946,0.0067966403,0.0012620938,0.0034053368,0.008218065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048594,0.00044268326,0.00075946935,0.0011902212,0.02618524,0.010172187,0.0024468482,0.006076805,0.0028261985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011656826,0.0000010536028,0.000012183144,0.000010131448,6.1938226e-7,0.000008386794,0.0002379878,0.000057465102,0.00001146082,0.9954169,0.0027335975,0.001509007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002944228,0.000004529955,0.00004893,0.000073634845,0.0000021486924,0.00004300706,0.00022833918,0.00028382184,0.000052629268,0.83787453,0.1613805,0.000004983003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032944246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025550032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008218065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004526792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039269268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032844365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399010122","doi":"10.1093/analys/anad100","title":"If epistemic partialism is true, don’t tell your friends","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.057890290552340254,"score_gpt":0.3020855116151529,"score_spread":0.24419522106281266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399010122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09497119,0.0029597173,0.092391245,0.30097795,0.001266322,0.00006687583,0.00035499266,0.00026158587,0.50675017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855554,0.00048845995,0.0028717215,0.0038385119,0.00022163133,0.000024216924,0.00005341498,0.00003260391,0.0069141495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993793,0.003728163,0.00025230716,0.0008598645,0.0009470325,0.00041956798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97827804,0.014021445,0.0016522096,0.0029125626,0.0023301444,0.0008056535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077351504,0.0002599541,0.0004925341,0.00070299057,0.003687415,0.004298543,0.00085456256,0.0033743011,0.010465362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022499435,0.00027919922,0.00042823804,0.0008064001,0.020551251,0.008534149,0.0027501907,0.0040367544,0.0015511881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033714026,0.000013843864,0.00044075708,0.000039903818,0.000016790358,0.0001361242,0.002097376,0.00031179975,0.00013080753,0.9864921,0.006233846,0.0040528756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010462885,0.0000075927624,0.00017071886,0.000043124288,0.000011725845,0.00009223901,0.0009008679,0.00065285235,0.00027175888,0.97864574,0.019181855,0.000011025155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003539211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025183486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010465362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028654304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017130524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04090786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399214606","doi":"10.1007/s13194-024-00583-8","title":"Overdetermination, underdetermination, and epistemic granularity in the historical sciences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Underdetermination; Overdetermination; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Granularity; Quine; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.12991325091226683,"score_gpt":0.3202747933627813,"score_spread":0.19036154245051448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399214606","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29000935,0.0074822702,0.48334566,0.057460096,0.0006838722,0.0001241401,0.00020576056,0.0002062769,0.16048263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894912,0.0004369759,0.009050557,0.00029385867,0.0001255266,0.000018571855,0.000017217255,0.000016310487,0.00054965355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98093146,0.012092398,0.0010608424,0.0016187845,0.0035308744,0.00076563854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8837757,0.08972582,0.009002486,0.010895503,0.0047068307,0.001893687],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028553123,0.00045617216,0.0011128813,0.005599433,0.0041274535,0.010541131,0.0015245888,0.0041679437,0.0035668856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069656424,0.0007558452,0.0007886716,0.0038046495,0.05741504,0.019261682,0.009991599,0.004975476,0.00023410968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021553013,0.000007873721,0.0004436608,0.00004324736,0.000009674062,0.000037780785,0.0016895565,0.0012769342,0.00008605146,0.99418074,0.00012583786,0.002077024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005160374,0.000004766475,0.0001929413,0.000038188155,0.0000072537073,0.000028185825,0.0003685569,0.0017195408,0.0001056176,0.99642247,0.0011001398,0.0000070871147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021388696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016408828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99587256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050567226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028604933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15100521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400595737","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v17i1.876","title":"The Hard Things about Hard Choices? A Reply to Chang","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.08733137235003517,"score_gpt":0.2796765872030998,"score_spread":0.1923452148530646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400595737","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017712123,0.0014102138,0.00009922457,0.993547,0.004159373,0.0000012383404,0.00000802673,0.0000076195784,0.0005901618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009010706,0.0012877259,0.0001935536,0.98211575,0.0059615723,0.000013411739,0.000009276354,0.00003832516,0.0013697369],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889475,0.005651657,0.00043522604,0.0014274406,0.0026921025,0.0008460726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90846485,0.07460809,0.0026264882,0.0023297905,0.0075749303,0.0043958183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019862162,0.00094618823,0.0016638491,0.0013244736,0.005957425,0.0071432455,0.0043875077,0.034115553,0.0056889704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10206869,0.001020494,0.0010916672,0.0022967434,0.020111566,0.01580976,0.0063791475,0.06294286,0.0025762073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034324938,0.000015293808,0.00020843236,0.00007565806,0.000012378833,0.00012544122,0.001915146,0.00008522754,0.00007745196,0.03971342,0.95371723,0.004019996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012320091,0.00008261644,0.0015048707,0.0011598864,0.000036543155,0.0006679483,0.0092255175,0.0005659717,0.0005043785,0.17699769,0.8088534,0.00027790054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009722184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010126458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034115553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053826915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007470363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1050424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400778818","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2024.2376940","title":"Conceptual engineering, cognitive deficiency, and the foundations of conceptual inquiry","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Management science; Cognitive science; Engineering; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.11917328364700132,"score_gpt":0.3156778693292747,"score_spread":0.1965045856822734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400778818","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06522175,0.03311521,0.35036886,0.23296063,0.0012830407,0.0003282705,0.00021329834,0.00044550278,0.31606346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9131482,0.004838841,0.07213076,0.004697978,0.00051480014,0.0003841726,0.00009889118,0.00009148756,0.004094833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95929927,0.029356288,0.0017389384,0.00233538,0.005761001,0.0015091209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9117155,0.06550013,0.0052802432,0.007938567,0.007031839,0.0025337492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04075791,0.0008612669,0.0014491715,0.007204796,0.005181581,0.015051088,0.003917245,0.005924491,0.0029066245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0577689,0.0007746823,0.0008460501,0.0042407094,0.13254783,0.026050061,0.010336988,0.009028203,0.0006098072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032663681,0.0000064360484,0.000099077995,0.000049457874,0.0000028633974,0.000024230627,0.0014562891,0.00017083962,0.000018857718,0.9960562,0.000367819,0.0017447642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036655047,0.000002278524,0.000045113728,0.000036676083,0.000001135529,0.000026969201,0.0005056029,0.00040421967,0.000021860433,0.99582964,0.003118759,0.000004183687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048817997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001727096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04075791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011957469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008583883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21555102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400797778","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192890580.001.0001","title":"Epistemic Blame","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06744904619528803,"score_gpt":0.25976240961485586,"score_spread":0.19231336341956784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400797778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008486024,0.014016844,0.022278614,0.122192465,0.0077593443,0.000055765206,0.00005439092,0.00027513906,0.82488143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6360652,0.014131087,0.0077736955,0.049064133,0.005184703,0.00016745477,0.000119697244,0.0005237413,0.28697038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911039,0.0050659305,0.00019777707,0.0006600736,0.0023651244,0.0006072103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890205,0.0063846456,0.00072671025,0.0010998583,0.0021683194,0.0005998737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048127663,0.00071273226,0.00063532445,0.0012502624,0.008981176,0.010375905,0.0017603759,0.005456562,0.012438366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017525602,0.0003853457,0.0007227289,0.0007235887,0.025095982,0.0117907645,0.005323447,0.01180991,0.0029843126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015391288,0.000021060821,0.00019648574,0.000098556535,0.000008037381,0.00012842652,0.009676879,0.00022742218,0.00010575983,0.88794714,0.08320763,0.018367194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070377423,0.000026080495,0.00023353458,0.0009573282,0.00001101713,0.0004150427,0.0067009903,0.00050018943,0.00042102885,0.30338922,0.6873079,0.000030639232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026840218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032033022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012438366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062126573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004945052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04507613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401053144","doi":"10.1007/s11229-024-04687-9","title":"Inquiry and reasons","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10021976976895125,"score_gpt":0.30234733478125514,"score_spread":0.2021275650123039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401053144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011690149,0.013898782,0.058447782,0.11686296,0.0025447202,0.00018335093,0.0003834562,0.0001706805,0.7958181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81140363,0.006582424,0.03758569,0.015203184,0.0023441631,0.0005650635,0.0005974895,0.00047743577,0.12524089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98514867,0.009048503,0.000518729,0.002148927,0.0022446737,0.0008904621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823632,0.011018282,0.00075089553,0.003313078,0.001937504,0.0006169451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014847111,0.0009955519,0.0012224719,0.003509358,0.0057037654,0.017480878,0.002326922,0.0066870083,0.025206195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03157568,0.0007302264,0.0009530027,0.0019201648,0.03762394,0.019670846,0.005680095,0.0072433343,0.003595927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043888554,0.000006163109,0.00006380887,0.00002550937,0.000003436023,0.000015827047,0.0013538194,0.000040189014,0.000026582096,0.9951443,0.0017144713,0.001601482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009991806,0.000003840014,0.00009107734,0.00018860814,0.000005304103,0.00003361513,0.0034458863,0.00018310278,0.00013247656,0.905748,0.09015196,0.000006064279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036410294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040312256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025206195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006772708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008863686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08432317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401456222","doi":"10.29173/pandpr29564","title":"Explorative Note on Phenomenology, Truth, and Correctness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phenomenology & Practice","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Correctness; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.07833873274901937,"score_gpt":0.3310338849085447,"score_spread":0.2526951521595253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401456222","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025624144,0.005317932,0.0012505213,0.08731132,0.8990326,0.00003460101,0.000067430294,0.00004803013,0.006681418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0075408765,0.0034087754,0.00090530224,0.026389107,0.95226043,0.00006770734,0.000026137655,0.000085973355,0.009315679],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98451114,0.0062820087,0.0012286797,0.0016100642,0.005601369,0.00076669443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7365024,0.228843,0.003397369,0.0069414414,0.02104685,0.003268904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022065748,0.001262122,0.0018056056,0.005207923,0.008138462,0.012341137,0.002896964,0.011224867,0.006958829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11341504,0.0006556023,0.0015203245,0.0019000978,0.017771922,0.0078907,0.0037918233,0.01993706,0.0022081723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003672403,0.000013614146,0.000040061088,0.00036479812,0.000019413354,0.00030543777,0.0011541374,0.000088751774,0.00016097097,0.03796377,0.9528726,0.006979839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017544864,0.000014530979,0.00015469673,0.0010061408,0.000027111066,0.00022202755,0.0009371823,0.00023916911,0.00019192486,0.02452184,0.97264004,0.000027849303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022340731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002673395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022065748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004092885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042522987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11669618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401473350","doi":"10.1007/s11406-024-00769-7","title":"A New Argument for Ethical Evidentialism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Doctrine; Philosophy; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of mind; Internalism and externalism; Deontological ethics; Metaphysics; Theology","score_opus":0.13857238471559946,"score_gpt":0.3445676835304498,"score_spread":0.20599529881485035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401473350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016887106,0.004124111,0.2248454,0.2890494,0.0049206815,0.000100627454,0.00022447595,0.00016693522,0.4596814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8505237,0.0016790756,0.059308283,0.034156173,0.0072082914,0.00051471445,0.00015564608,0.0003101905,0.04614406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98794925,0.0063903695,0.00051793567,0.0018168098,0.0025637671,0.00076176785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96894383,0.021395179,0.001313776,0.0040143123,0.0033137682,0.0010191147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015485274,0.0007453827,0.001305902,0.0026065253,0.00625698,0.009474617,0.0030115086,0.009509025,0.013459345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039354347,0.00075377146,0.0017780521,0.0012910971,0.037979666,0.021545997,0.006805395,0.018917019,0.0018500965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003312743,0.000004240628,0.000020555259,0.0000069861753,0.0000015358098,0.000008795505,0.00012974584,0.000027960323,0.000012428101,0.9985201,0.0007947979,0.00046955104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009474819,0.0000025327618,0.000020074842,0.000017734512,0.0000024374692,0.00001715876,0.00007811935,0.00021669503,0.00002993437,0.9923701,0.007232408,0.0000034019786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011917703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011198316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015485274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049821585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032864253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081894934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401479091","doi":"10.1007/s11098-024-02173-z","title":"Updating on the evidence of others","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of language; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.39232133899535065,"score_gpt":0.3875033772673601,"score_spread":0.0048179617279905385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401479091","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2247118,0.005559739,0.29331166,0.08319949,0.00203747,0.00032992303,0.00046785604,0.00038131082,0.3900008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568734,0.000896459,0.030480413,0.0023063119,0.00058654795,0.000053615255,0.00008947571,0.00009058595,0.008623114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97860384,0.012032107,0.0011141264,0.0029756245,0.0047335634,0.0005407209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86740065,0.08807866,0.008752055,0.020180527,0.013612344,0.001975767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025745163,0.0005231323,0.0007118878,0.0038782137,0.0028588576,0.006749879,0.0017468459,0.003375942,0.012008368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11451364,0.0005341201,0.0006446584,0.0018267568,0.013739923,0.013147633,0.0060404264,0.0052847518,0.0012675462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022624532,0.0001036037,0.00952745,0.0005614986,0.00021489551,0.0013435902,0.029865218,0.0020457434,0.0043536876,0.8013521,0.0080575105,0.14234847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040839528,0.00011698785,0.0062636193,0.0012921365,0.00020600062,0.001004819,0.010024816,0.0075019677,0.005720961,0.8315421,0.13616715,0.000118668526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016594463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013950957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025745163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022777738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019300167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13615507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402215799","doi":"10.7202/1111531ar","title":"Leaping and Lurching into the 21st Century: A Review of Réal Fillion’s The Elective Mind Fillion, R. (2021). The elective mind: Philosophy and the undergraduate degree","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Degree (music); Psychology; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.0774328851998357,"score_gpt":0.3512932104552837,"score_spread":0.273860325255448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402215799","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000023650526,0.9988136,0.000012613686,0.0006268497,0.00015530695,0.0000013351497,0.0000033613774,8.266109e-7,0.0003624189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00039734706,0.9986524,0.000048670096,0.0005728956,0.00010180061,0.0000028215127,0.0000067076235,0.0000010293214,0.00021636054],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987882,0.00034920318,0.00014977777,0.00011169052,0.0005227947,0.000078332916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604756,0.0024420542,0.0003128133,0.00004530902,0.00095946057,0.00019293364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003245621,0.0007068126,0.001662113,0.0055508274,0.0010012706,0.0032050842,0.00093266176,0.0017550631,0.0031002937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063772164,0.0005186867,0.0005715638,0.009835933,0.0020885516,0.0037835087,0.001491792,0.0027947088,0.0009342658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006348965,0.000042927015,0.00023846173,0.05787387,0.00012998786,0.00016412164,0.001531928,0.0001928091,0.00023866715,0.020513598,0.13738707,0.7816232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071950917,0.000032987853,0.000720864,0.026171356,0.000056004472,0.00025469277,0.0006400555,0.000015956995,0.000048606184,0.0017074056,0.97032565,0.000019228988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03400258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0744985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03400258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042284383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012704113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06760931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402216249","doi":"10.7202/1110367ar","title":"János Tőzsér, \"The Failure of Philosophical Knowledge: Why Philosophers are not Entitled to their Beliefs\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.12684465057941238,"score_gpt":0.32397682958813456,"score_spread":0.19713217900872218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402216249","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031555735,0.9133975,0.0006494254,0.071100846,0.0077508343,0.00001452921,0.00019126623,0.000024207557,0.0065558027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0160622,0.9284904,0.0009809106,0.035900094,0.005306831,0.00009489725,0.00041987957,0.00008024707,0.012664588],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994599,0.0021839603,0.0004553946,0.00041297692,0.0021198438,0.0002288045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99139977,0.0049578324,0.0007099888,0.00014602608,0.0025597627,0.00022670736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052781557,0.00067040644,0.0009696221,0.0030890238,0.001366181,0.0039331424,0.0013073188,0.0033119929,0.008199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020620508,0.00046473174,0.00054388266,0.0045080613,0.0022466967,0.00778146,0.0019768698,0.0041811876,0.004448145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017494916,0.000030926392,0.0006564496,0.008933549,0.00013906338,0.00017847767,0.0028160473,0.00012279031,0.00031020746,0.08318764,0.7777626,0.1256873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042271666,0.000019288706,0.0015774281,0.0038922513,0.00008153526,0.00018150182,0.00081977074,0.00004436692,0.000390933,0.022753464,0.97016966,0.000027577433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010833578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01075669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010833578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024674747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008467469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027913868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402474251","doi":"10.1007/s10670-024-00860-1","title":"Explaining Deontic Status by Good Reasoning","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Deontic logic; Ontology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.034566074911670026,"score_gpt":0.2666271057852702,"score_spread":0.2320610308736002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402474251","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086029984,0.004755607,0.42892876,0.051615104,0.0007138708,0.00012142047,0.00057693484,0.0004192026,0.42683905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489573,0.0010631734,0.03802753,0.0015572887,0.0005287122,0.00011810119,0.00027762426,0.00017819063,0.0092920065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917516,0.0043715355,0.0005509937,0.0011571469,0.0014651553,0.00070348004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97747916,0.014679283,0.0010723775,0.0046916283,0.001528505,0.00054904487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013490996,0.0007598838,0.0013735214,0.0034198149,0.00438545,0.0087713525,0.0031797604,0.005288511,0.011403106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027142514,0.0011677988,0.001712339,0.0020369117,0.0294735,0.030232003,0.006997431,0.007356885,0.0013381552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047136823,0.0000032276423,0.000035481473,0.000011236116,0.000002351176,0.000010228443,0.00027444365,0.00016996011,0.000022065515,0.9986203,0.00022556528,0.00062045216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031609159,8.1001315e-7,0.000015371386,0.000006811644,0.0000013825754,0.0000055128876,0.000056245663,0.00033838328,0.000022873264,0.9985642,0.000983281,0.0000019838806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004294604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033851166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013490996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004225809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028821894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07134801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402735461","doi":"10.1111/phis.12270","title":"The relational foundations of epistemic normativity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Issues","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13942213779372395,"score_gpt":0.34003044071721017,"score_spread":0.20060830292348622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402735461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085425735,0.0024554143,0.33745646,0.038917266,0.000506849,0.00011194366,0.00019322825,0.00023479047,0.5346983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98265,0.00037236424,0.012273357,0.0008318095,0.00018498242,0.00008853658,0.00004519368,0.00004463117,0.0035090945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97825706,0.014188045,0.0009823288,0.0026153699,0.0029919774,0.00096519926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9714732,0.017036362,0.0028410403,0.004163826,0.0036253657,0.00086016825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01564555,0.0003970045,0.00068492646,0.0017053775,0.0041632266,0.010521275,0.0012621502,0.0030510386,0.0051962016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027184399,0.00047778987,0.00072953425,0.0016824444,0.035572466,0.01345625,0.0057717357,0.0038430698,0.00078913325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031797524,0.0000031456998,0.00009287319,0.0000081988555,0.0000033992242,0.000015439133,0.0007366923,0.00012507946,0.000038976443,0.9981664,0.00015812097,0.0006486297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005991079,0.000003393839,0.00010224486,0.000022508462,0.0000034266084,0.000017478395,0.000505895,0.000537425,0.00006955718,0.9940355,0.004690849,0.0000057194757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035213667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016051412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01564555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004109342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024658157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08274257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402942414","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i3.8818","title":"On the Ethics of Real-Life Examples of Argument","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.17396522314448498,"score_gpt":0.3165458129415229,"score_spread":0.14258058979703792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402942414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016679006,0.015296586,0.16963667,0.2072042,0.0016898311,0.00013530714,0.00011776155,0.00025447426,0.5889862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8798554,0.0039385883,0.07092676,0.012393739,0.001117897,0.0006569095,0.00012075544,0.00039805067,0.03059196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89303964,0.09419482,0.0017654885,0.0032038167,0.0060075917,0.0017886221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9189289,0.06321674,0.0031943696,0.008968332,0.0042849197,0.00140671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036830932,0.0011413678,0.0011668113,0.0039455453,0.013968064,0.021886447,0.0041111144,0.0128785,0.0068890867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059516624,0.0009148189,0.0014522529,0.0026787212,0.10094144,0.027157847,0.010148986,0.014171899,0.002097607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037212003,0.000003197948,0.00003490629,0.000025204476,0.0000025810045,0.000062217994,0.0034672325,0.000091086855,0.000014459061,0.99407876,0.0014399312,0.0007767717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009996654,0.0000042901443,0.0000349511,0.00015634073,0.0000031270486,0.00013697788,0.0025554562,0.0005015716,0.00007049363,0.9302606,0.066257134,0.000008984303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001805823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015835576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036830932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0087455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045206915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19478291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402942428","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i3.8693","title":"Particularism About Arguments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; European Regional Development Fund; University of Windsor","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06390580805537117,"score_gpt":0.2839270534649076,"score_spread":0.22002124540953644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402942428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031600215,0.010015664,0.44623163,0.031200107,0.0011434748,0.0001423406,0.00028145485,0.0003791404,0.4790059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9001228,0.0032817468,0.066431105,0.0046838555,0.0011599697,0.00029195307,0.00028088983,0.000293484,0.023454182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98765546,0.0067689596,0.0006409507,0.0024335983,0.0015984506,0.0009026415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885245,0.007064119,0.0008388701,0.0021462338,0.0010130146,0.0004132711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011375928,0.00080676336,0.0010817832,0.0028702945,0.0038119652,0.008696089,0.001881328,0.0047642644,0.0091852145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016155124,0.00087108265,0.002468772,0.001639592,0.026344601,0.019719975,0.0075444705,0.007876912,0.0012756943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032473242,0.0000015331054,0.000058045687,0.00002496109,0.0000059549184,0.000021637714,0.00055813044,0.000107202795,0.000047730326,0.99767286,0.0003119055,0.001186766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004844279,0.000003910212,0.00006625896,0.000032382362,0.000006324949,0.000056251156,0.0001761078,0.00028533695,0.00006413965,0.98171073,0.0175898,0.000003979455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001207835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010127892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011375928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053860205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014376431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060162425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402943298","doi":"10.1093/analys/anae066","title":"Prescriptive and Evaluative Norms of Assertion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.05896211011207234,"score_gpt":0.3113359419764128,"score_spread":0.2523738318643404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402943298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031707,0.008095412,0.05649768,0.41855824,0.0014160004,0.00008780721,0.0001365736,0.000101916936,0.48339942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97609204,0.0011760802,0.005853768,0.0073567713,0.000843074,0.0001600576,0.00002772782,0.00008672281,0.0084038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9704315,0.02261246,0.00074298726,0.0016113773,0.0035087653,0.001092901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9498202,0.041188445,0.0012058258,0.0032544837,0.003963446,0.0005675159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030970192,0.0005615981,0.0006053298,0.0017435688,0.0075918026,0.011643864,0.0027862103,0.0067410073,0.003081154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038787078,0.0006031932,0.0005511847,0.0017268676,0.088947065,0.0195761,0.0054417625,0.010934769,0.000387891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055153023,0.0000030352378,0.000019434128,0.000007982828,0.0000012774558,0.000014408954,0.004376424,0.00005051263,0.00001689441,0.9931879,0.0014571978,0.00085930736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008600933,0.000003709531,0.00008152171,0.000066237124,0.000002597243,0.000018981651,0.0022834002,0.00032912332,0.000116779695,0.9827172,0.01436271,0.000009091806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008600687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005895122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030970192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009252626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070709693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16378796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403262715","doi":"10.1111/phib.12361","title":"What Second‐Best Epistemology Could Be","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytic Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11779552250451471,"score_gpt":0.31308587345759925,"score_spread":0.19529035095308456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403262715","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041271232,0.0060089044,0.47508767,0.13166237,0.0027527998,0.000096530806,0.00023126147,0.00040241505,0.34248686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9264678,0.0011978986,0.05269203,0.005553817,0.00076879526,0.00012586974,0.00014373365,0.00020420353,0.012845861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851892,0.009276051,0.0005025075,0.0016538478,0.0023794011,0.0009989257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772207,0.008948869,0.0013853037,0.0057160347,0.004970999,0.0017580503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019126711,0.0008218036,0.001345863,0.0025687537,0.004313385,0.012646097,0.0021613212,0.0051684077,0.00864529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033353284,0.0006191564,0.0013056545,0.001382357,0.025191683,0.021334568,0.0056219744,0.0070203464,0.0019085783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000096314725,0.000006513476,0.0000517833,0.000017990098,0.0000059372364,0.000009112183,0.00019016168,0.00031625244,0.000019599282,0.99703825,0.00088744814,0.0014472769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004236745,0.000002289789,0.000015545047,0.000028128798,0.000001908811,0.000010012449,0.0001521332,0.00094457786,0.000046117697,0.99547017,0.0033210001,0.0000039737915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021845056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017464045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019126711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00609903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044651297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10115296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403886270","doi":"10.1007/s11245-024-10116-w","title":"Should we Trust Our Feeds? Social Media, Misinformation, and the Epistemology of Testimony","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Topoi","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Collège Montmorency","funders":"","keywords":"Misinformation; Social media; Social epistemology; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09409951057208775,"score_gpt":0.29622390479604516,"score_spread":0.2021243942239574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403886270","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07909208,0.019071532,0.08359622,0.4452569,0.0021786813,0.000091502196,0.00043725793,0.0001616048,0.3701142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765489,0.003960263,0.0069709206,0.0067926925,0.00081999064,0.00006208819,0.00006675424,0.00008872958,0.0046895915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96863717,0.023507047,0.0013372169,0.0017593644,0.0036635569,0.0010956753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8462061,0.12665063,0.008197885,0.008068754,0.00926914,0.0016075106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029650938,0.00056164764,0.00092977646,0.0056533855,0.009546896,0.02692597,0.0024508657,0.010381361,0.0062649576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.117374666,0.0008882047,0.00047513025,0.004466289,0.058213666,0.041832842,0.0069104484,0.009296349,0.0011536716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037551865,0.00002018443,0.0010597832,0.00017409603,0.000027245202,0.00015519341,0.027490031,0.00015254713,0.000112384696,0.95555574,0.0036225934,0.011592697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015646183,0.00001250139,0.0004731505,0.00060851197,0.00002799048,0.00017118388,0.025130587,0.0007431027,0.00044829593,0.9417896,0.030543143,0.000036316145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007334736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053039496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029650938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004957847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059999605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15681106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403916222","doi":"10.3998/ergo.6788","title":"Autonomy as Practical Understanding","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychology; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.4746616869622343,"score_gpt":0.47891760958848395,"score_spread":0.004255922626249631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403916222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041307684,0.0014539631,0.24942657,0.018768925,0.0002611036,0.00010732745,0.00007517169,0.00016812781,0.68843096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96630067,0.00059737155,0.01858878,0.0011018068,0.00018429448,0.0001309271,0.000068502406,0.00005063571,0.012976998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734986,0.0010896517,0.00013634858,0.0005168333,0.0006106187,0.00029663747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651355,0.0016349326,0.00044659266,0.0006530344,0.00040148117,0.00035042813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028847354,0.00048229084,0.0002959238,0.0012902681,0.0019384633,0.0047596726,0.0010725275,0.0017963141,0.005327006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053968164,0.00020112208,0.00093585026,0.0006236685,0.021896478,0.008083358,0.0043520965,0.0032549084,0.0008793184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017279655,0.000005222629,0.00009467306,0.00001375822,0.0000014318439,0.000011440412,0.00081818894,0.00019768665,0.00004906302,0.9968905,0.00022594832,0.0016904866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043593623,0.000009250322,0.00017765803,0.000031805463,0.0000043777554,0.000027375749,0.000417072,0.0007864233,0.00013660359,0.98401654,0.014384525,0.0000040867835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017886969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011923618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005327006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028151525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020644718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020425498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403952721","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.30","title":"Opportunity Costs and Resource Allocation Problems: Epistemology for Finite Minds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Resource allocation; Resource (disambiguation); Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.12312714624079654,"score_gpt":0.2737110599725582,"score_spread":0.15058391373176164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403952721","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082730606,0.006216081,0.5805353,0.043378036,0.0004846944,0.00017436255,0.00021283835,0.00012944915,0.28613877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9463161,0.00111369,0.045664594,0.0008805581,0.00042725555,0.00032915242,0.00005554273,0.000056268233,0.0051567024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886402,0.0077088308,0.00044336132,0.0010303677,0.0015953985,0.00058183563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9454711,0.04526381,0.002134303,0.003362136,0.0022735838,0.0014951108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018784974,0.00076480024,0.0013797061,0.004213919,0.0033101756,0.009660773,0.0028186764,0.0042870743,0.009326066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035998955,0.0007453606,0.0015279446,0.0020816233,0.0305066,0.01599738,0.006841477,0.005672584,0.0004632079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000231767,0.0000031989978,0.00003527659,0.000011525198,0.000003849139,0.00000874934,0.000064298634,0.000574504,0.0000085951815,0.9986313,0.000092307375,0.0005640553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002953248,0.0000011952792,0.000019521127,0.00000943665,0.000001216166,0.000006383062,0.000032749056,0.0011150853,0.000006393474,0.9982887,0.00051454426,0.0000017066286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018948464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013163878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018784974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008299448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029077828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099345624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404297810","doi":"10.1162/opmi_a_00168","title":"When New Experience Leads to New Knowledge: A Computational Framework for Formalizing Epistemically Transformative Experiences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Mind","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Philosophy; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.16232369331795912,"score_gpt":0.39285729298984573,"score_spread":0.2305335996718866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404297810","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028011514,0.00029827372,0.9395631,0.0025995634,0.000097237666,0.00014880548,0.00018929367,0.00027757816,0.028814679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7604885,0.00026045484,0.23466924,0.00038854376,0.000086680535,0.00045114133,0.0002559826,0.0001449324,0.0032544949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518883,0.0024309207,0.0003722121,0.00088077225,0.0006560426,0.00047125036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98086137,0.013560744,0.001647064,0.0021564628,0.00087436463,0.00089999445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057446957,0.0007930041,0.00069890375,0.0021694822,0.002208562,0.006032598,0.0030191548,0.002883216,0.011646494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023011671,0.0008635646,0.002770889,0.0014734876,0.014753788,0.014972409,0.008224067,0.0046765106,0.0007233915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019391364,0.000021680173,0.00031147976,0.000051207437,0.00001750758,0.00017872691,0.0011036757,0.013871482,0.00026345623,0.9809544,0.00024006727,0.002967081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000194812,0.000017075057,0.00010452481,0.00004572325,0.0000168916,0.0000698241,0.00031503403,0.062656365,0.0002791923,0.93339694,0.0030578617,0.000021189479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033929357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030778358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011646494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027259078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016116343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03896135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404530073","doi":"","title":"Believe it or not, it’s all about Beliefs !","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Information technology; Psychology; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06751289495492263,"score_gpt":0.28217365666557737,"score_spread":0.21466076171065473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404530073","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008183,0.016300373,0.014256708,0.48101547,0.014894073,0.000035870606,0.0008299344,0.00021644619,0.46426815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4656913,0.010843676,0.0070510404,0.05789703,0.009870029,0.00013785782,0.00092061225,0.00082960457,0.4467589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973738,0.0013607477,0.000081969134,0.00046399856,0.00057344773,0.00014609848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99168265,0.004289354,0.00029189172,0.00075251114,0.002502846,0.00048080218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003924596,0.0006032113,0.00086959486,0.00095821015,0.004443958,0.011864644,0.0006731052,0.005142262,0.055840354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015801594,0.00032697307,0.0005182195,0.0009308144,0.007520836,0.008842097,0.0027591886,0.007012672,0.009542867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057705212,0.000013068899,0.00035666797,0.00014830675,0.000027217204,0.00010112321,0.008008715,0.000115647235,0.0006723272,0.80496013,0.16087997,0.024659105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013987801,0.0000107734295,0.00097273686,0.00044602744,0.000019466235,0.00015125234,0.0068583847,0.00040882046,0.00039468933,0.21142496,0.7792699,0.000029079609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009263504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066078044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055840354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00566847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026999216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1868046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404530841","doi":"10.1017/s0012217323000446","title":"Précis of <i>The Limitations of the Open Mind</i> and Replies to Nathan Ballantyne and Miriam Schleifer McCormick","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.14092687640607413,"score_gpt":0.2865326816158594,"score_spread":0.14560580520978525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404530841","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015548902,0.0021402435,0.00014662389,0.9895822,0.007144311,0.0000025602794,0.0000061375226,0.000011999417,0.0008104672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014338743,0.0031596737,0.0007486415,0.95648265,0.020496286,0.0000631543,0.000012940065,0.00009607628,0.0046018027],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757776,0.012935498,0.0015463281,0.0026034287,0.005989102,0.0011479784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8830753,0.08271424,0.006338184,0.0034685167,0.01904906,0.005354689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029901026,0.0012921884,0.0015847204,0.0013493269,0.009942227,0.013965641,0.004539358,0.018392533,0.0045508486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0936803,0.0009235937,0.0011352748,0.0011162163,0.032267936,0.014363158,0.007906782,0.065704405,0.0034971335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030219848,0.000011358553,0.00015488012,0.00012408136,0.000014164232,0.00018728204,0.0035316271,0.000048003698,0.000112170565,0.034845773,0.95676225,0.004178202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003471975,0.000038327384,0.0005912422,0.0011271348,0.000025654508,0.0005816092,0.0075852047,0.00029731085,0.00051844615,0.04729694,0.9417597,0.00014371064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021020845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017631665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029901026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009487738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010733072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15813363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404611290","doi":"10.1007/s11229-024-04793-8","title":"Against cross-world anchoring","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Anchoring; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.07519814419614304,"score_gpt":0.31735295221713533,"score_spread":0.2421548080209923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404611290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029976737,0.013685369,0.11222215,0.24636042,0.0047893096,0.00017947232,0.00047765218,0.00034827203,0.59196067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9154188,0.005020385,0.03320575,0.022358704,0.002116151,0.00062481966,0.0003345232,0.00061307184,0.02030776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9528242,0.035399303,0.001457494,0.0041258424,0.0050240187,0.0011691101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8791213,0.08848404,0.0039579305,0.01947358,0.0076526795,0.001310482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046526425,0.0013259901,0.0015455921,0.0060110213,0.0057507674,0.014817038,0.0033748636,0.0073330593,0.01863027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14244466,0.0007736178,0.0006836402,0.0045889188,0.03541135,0.03417303,0.014515178,0.012992027,0.0034665223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023600804,0.000008559342,0.00010223233,0.00008230588,0.000018360317,0.000038308874,0.0066834996,0.00010136074,0.000032125205,0.9820363,0.0037497722,0.0071235574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020053954,0.0000078050525,0.00014019605,0.00066447107,0.00002086049,0.00003994592,0.0073075797,0.000541007,0.00020075818,0.9327616,0.058284085,0.000011623274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021647306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002473001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046526425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049389107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039729644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24605817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404749374","doi":"10.3998/ergo.6914","title":"The Ideology of Pragmatic Humeanism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University; University of Bristol","keywords":"Ideology; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.16432249596325463,"score_gpt":0.4132564516425135,"score_spread":0.24893395567925888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404749374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009671685,0.0070140073,0.0948987,0.17764388,0.0015527935,0.000069697846,0.0001648305,0.00030521114,0.70867926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.888067,0.0031839602,0.02629088,0.027334403,0.003415,0.00043041486,0.00009028058,0.00025389693,0.050934218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98634815,0.007896977,0.00029350325,0.0016918076,0.0029091716,0.00086042075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927108,0.0043370263,0.00040850305,0.0012827293,0.000796622,0.00046423986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013488616,0.00069471425,0.0010009329,0.0024027652,0.0059311087,0.009261356,0.0017465899,0.005952906,0.0063189915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012289245,0.0005359647,0.00081524753,0.0011034107,0.061072722,0.0124362055,0.0069350023,0.008820646,0.0015990911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027345743,0.000001960375,0.000014908891,0.000010147645,0.0000016447857,0.0000056738745,0.00028747166,0.00004109334,0.000012373656,0.99758375,0.0012601723,0.0007780945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007304871,0.000003441884,0.000029762276,0.000021972657,0.0000018405779,0.0000142519475,0.000108495966,0.00020211807,0.000035836638,0.97450894,0.025061646,0.0000043439254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002803224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018580015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013488616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074987398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044388515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071335495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405083585","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2024.2436950","title":"Gambles between obvious truths","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Action (physics); Counterexample; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Statistics; Physics","score_opus":0.20687401070306144,"score_gpt":0.34685276947978094,"score_spread":0.1399787587767195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405083585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2907746,0.0020038073,0.11322876,0.01993897,0.0008777995,0.0003588482,0.00061462953,0.00049870816,0.5717039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631768,0.00038477016,0.012248675,0.0013490593,0.00017493298,0.00018026971,0.00023114552,0.0000807568,0.022173518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99193656,0.0038134262,0.0004422085,0.0012862707,0.0017738874,0.00074763404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836383,0.011607572,0.0012129021,0.001788867,0.0008098242,0.000942602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075199455,0.0010715184,0.0010787839,0.0014022413,0.0019778325,0.005722002,0.0012674037,0.0042734477,0.042748865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043695386,0.0006498782,0.0009916112,0.00075563596,0.0061953473,0.011999954,0.0052141324,0.0042692497,0.002980524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038698476,0.00015375644,0.0020881966,0.000120102915,0.000083470695,0.00045200624,0.0009659582,0.0018072147,0.0005873555,0.9713978,0.003688297,0.018268792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067596935,0.00009412261,0.0013147852,0.00011595046,0.000034727564,0.000186852,0.00052218675,0.0053690397,0.00041562918,0.9786477,0.0131961405,0.000035209578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005102647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000619937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042748865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016508404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091377966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14300919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405234122","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.57.3.0333","title":"Sophisms and Contempt for Autonomy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Autonomy; Philosophy; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09365532945548626,"score_gpt":0.2821873199907969,"score_spread":0.1885319905353106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405234122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14331174,0.0013509174,0.094471924,0.046752825,0.0010005984,0.000097422846,0.000057601686,0.00017425383,0.7127827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921217,0.00013158435,0.003189728,0.0009379683,0.00011676399,0.000026052749,0.000008720338,0.00002411292,0.0034434854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98804283,0.00856646,0.00038044062,0.0008913211,0.0015594822,0.00055944355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98587704,0.009680732,0.0008920919,0.0012393333,0.0016160486,0.0006946771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010154084,0.00033889187,0.00041744843,0.0010961327,0.0029532167,0.0041818605,0.0005027391,0.0024863263,0.0033361681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018596768,0.00021560788,0.0006635244,0.00036543407,0.024218272,0.0073046763,0.0039497362,0.0038455676,0.00038757164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001107674,0.000005338777,0.00020845115,0.000017358914,0.000003331764,0.00006457165,0.0026106914,0.00011257296,0.00013821194,0.9946419,0.00064832135,0.0015380709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007936327,0.000014089326,0.00029112512,0.00004502844,0.000005686753,0.00006507704,0.0008740636,0.00067514775,0.00019819751,0.98716146,0.010655101,0.000007125532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073908083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006517038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010154084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003081777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001644016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053700566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156245","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.8380","title":"On the Virtue-theoretic Approach to Argument Appraisal","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.0414757071857795,"score_gpt":0.28457642547190787,"score_spread":0.24310071828612836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018800909,0.0082362555,0.3348056,0.07904909,0.002126555,0.0002168269,0.00009404722,0.00024939943,0.5564213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9065391,0.0026893376,0.065976486,0.0069741537,0.0020167117,0.00028957333,0.000079200436,0.00017208367,0.015263243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9719295,0.019391043,0.00074797304,0.0012919817,0.0059109526,0.000728414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9566697,0.029867271,0.0021988023,0.0026819268,0.0075229346,0.0010593805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028366176,0.0007740721,0.00088116445,0.006329312,0.0030524533,0.011674097,0.0022212807,0.0042995084,0.007976577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033479102,0.0004952722,0.0011460263,0.0020177355,0.035703883,0.011198404,0.005817626,0.007377284,0.0015299189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012531983,0.000009611849,0.00011574003,0.00007622501,0.000009061345,0.000034102064,0.000884361,0.0002706081,0.00005796963,0.992168,0.0018266893,0.004535141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014630309,0.0000137112,0.00015249553,0.00015671598,0.000007343901,0.000049504506,0.00037252606,0.0015978605,0.000104494255,0.982044,0.015475569,0.000011143534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074395345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009419041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028366176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057118325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003376163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15001649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406365300","doi":"10.1007/s44204-024-00237-9","title":"Understanding, knowledge, injustice and the right to know","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Right to know; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Social psychology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.0768248542710949,"score_gpt":0.29440306964788865,"score_spread":0.21757821537679375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406365300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15979853,0.016961059,0.038125318,0.15233164,0.0004568844,0.00006828328,0.00013303006,0.000041582163,0.63208365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99014354,0.0013601085,0.0016167377,0.0024200736,0.00011934447,0.000022794786,0.000024432342,0.000010683517,0.0042822906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909237,0.005253115,0.0005985701,0.00086414843,0.0015042297,0.0008562183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97235537,0.019216847,0.002738877,0.0030366082,0.0016600693,0.0009921112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011743555,0.00034267415,0.0007204932,0.001979309,0.0055118636,0.012070548,0.0012189043,0.008288843,0.0045165885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01838857,0.0003799751,0.0004531898,0.0013457758,0.089028515,0.018246144,0.006881483,0.0076446515,0.00037568706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001078934,0.000017341708,0.00049418566,0.00004527608,0.0000065683375,0.00006792468,0.008619001,0.00013672413,0.000065200285,0.9874063,0.000420285,0.002710402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056937906,0.0000055638943,0.00024560493,0.00008005374,0.0000038987687,0.00006951841,0.0031438463,0.00011107008,0.0000722009,0.9914484,0.004805736,0.000008442367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0080860015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004536758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012070548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040654205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008108704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06210661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406721302","doi":"10.1017/epi.2024.35","title":"Luck and normative achievements: Let not safety be our guide","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Normative; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04906550307172895,"score_gpt":0.3053013587497436,"score_spread":0.25623585567801466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406721302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042850327,0.0037898128,0.10075082,0.16722322,0.0007853467,0.00006155302,0.00014101442,0.00023555056,0.6841623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96570164,0.0007616307,0.010130363,0.006215093,0.00033600687,0.00008459538,0.000043864828,0.00007347895,0.016653284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99413574,0.0033982107,0.00024691876,0.0006459232,0.0010981732,0.00047496354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892847,0.006241955,0.00069343613,0.0015649038,0.001569192,0.0006457457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008393266,0.00042232947,0.00058803125,0.0010529858,0.0038446651,0.006324704,0.0010876174,0.0038160542,0.004306305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012955414,0.00030303004,0.00046897517,0.0005272751,0.047538556,0.009254682,0.0038697717,0.005950979,0.0011010325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030259096,0.000004643767,0.00004076082,0.000007658214,0.000001623683,0.000013478128,0.00041658155,0.00008154602,0.00002122501,0.99774325,0.00074887596,0.00091743964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033725248,0.0000039648903,0.000038261205,0.00002656491,0.0000013855685,0.00001658355,0.00026505635,0.00020615477,0.00009415798,0.98761463,0.011724444,0.0000053819504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024859135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024944453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008393266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034099082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032117849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044388413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406772888","doi":"10.1017/s0012217324000301","title":"Group Belief: The Cognitive Non-Summative Account","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Summative assessment; Group (periodic table); Cognition; Psychology; Belief system; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics education; Formative assessment; Chemistry; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.04900467390224225,"score_gpt":0.27667186482645106,"score_spread":0.2276671909242088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406772888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24712689,0.0009444212,0.14166756,0.03574516,0.00027656878,0.00019562182,0.00013209411,0.00015351766,0.5737582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942694,0.000046463865,0.0028780096,0.00055708434,0.00006249654,0.00005597636,0.00001810305,0.000012173741,0.0021003892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874556,0.006636794,0.00036575404,0.0012672597,0.0031069976,0.0011676692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980371,0.011375083,0.0018951456,0.0026711328,0.0025550441,0.0011326467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010686118,0.0005603523,0.0005886856,0.0023603297,0.0040922984,0.0050018877,0.002067678,0.003018242,0.006229328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023299105,0.00023419209,0.0005946429,0.0011629957,0.020052271,0.006561144,0.005406944,0.0031466598,0.0005186719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036331367,0.00003061813,0.0012149423,0.000045767127,0.000015909369,0.00013980985,0.0076578767,0.0009633255,0.00020020574,0.9833487,0.00096862623,0.0053779227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022338587,0.00001770059,0.0009842105,0.000053221494,0.000015900636,0.00006114631,0.002654923,0.0037555438,0.0002491461,0.9854312,0.0067420416,0.000012651079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049130647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032573459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010686118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037976922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021182187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056514263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406772918","doi":"10.1017/s001221732400026x","title":"Conceptual Dynamite: An Argument for Thoughtful Language in Conceptual Engineering","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamite; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; History; Chemistry","score_opus":0.04923661759232381,"score_gpt":0.2841665873978861,"score_spread":0.23492996980556227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406772918","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031452153,0.0025561056,0.51221186,0.21628061,0.0014938005,0.00026657936,0.00012680519,0.00048215984,0.23512995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9158139,0.0006208374,0.06645935,0.0074810646,0.0007659836,0.00069280417,0.00005722212,0.00033803226,0.007770825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95754224,0.03290913,0.0012118384,0.0028043294,0.004300556,0.0012319456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8854257,0.09269436,0.004101585,0.011288518,0.004499256,0.0019905744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055620592,0.0010255724,0.0013746349,0.0052753855,0.009123413,0.014901918,0.004781454,0.011835518,0.0076003065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07580393,0.0011831248,0.00199521,0.0024606942,0.11686353,0.035248186,0.01617966,0.01687109,0.0011329823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004723859,0.0000038908242,0.000024161154,0.000011388209,0.0000018233038,0.00001656679,0.0011958416,0.00006592413,0.000019354784,0.9980494,0.00024451007,0.00036242267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000175458,0.000004183365,0.000015496613,0.00004163872,0.0000031016407,0.000037801,0.000609014,0.00061047677,0.000076515535,0.99168175,0.006896103,0.000006385401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019391766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010268247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055620592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009268337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056155534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29415333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406913208","doi":"10.4324/9781003183853-57","title":"Knowledge as Wisdom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.09822102220543513,"score_gpt":0.291272884015731,"score_spread":0.19305186181029585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406913208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027400793,0.027315151,0.0026183187,0.025819799,0.001134587,0.000024130788,0.000038100305,0.00005877412,0.9402511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36109418,0.034271494,0.005816771,0.01006829,0.0012519188,0.00010590112,0.00018200107,0.00016568573,0.5870439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823135,0.000561887,0.000043002925,0.00020278468,0.00063176185,0.0003292412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983754,0.00072221085,0.00008295312,0.0002043265,0.00036915744,0.00024589806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019291166,0.00068501564,0.0005669965,0.0022048412,0.011118469,0.01520267,0.0020390635,0.0033200854,0.010805413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002743139,0.00025829783,0.00033620308,0.0029759025,0.040788107,0.010305251,0.0041160546,0.004501977,0.0029741232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004168636,0.0000068110885,0.00006281432,0.00006775951,0.0000022962502,0.00010616037,0.0120365005,0.00010185079,0.000045878514,0.95009035,0.02267776,0.014797724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038109656,0.0000058357537,0.0001730315,0.0003131821,0.000002664012,0.00010649836,0.0070604724,0.000078304256,0.000051496536,0.3183072,0.6738898,0.0000076592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09245047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12619022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09245047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020232422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018758934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18382472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408192811","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2025.2470869","title":"Faith and the practical self","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Medicine; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0865048685046294,"score_gpt":0.33896903432683045,"score_spread":0.25246416582220105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408192811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02773899,0.02021814,0.023454446,0.13393094,0.0011139198,0.000054549575,0.000061041195,0.0001107167,0.7933172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9307301,0.0037760283,0.005716984,0.01392611,0.0006303495,0.00013372011,0.000033901433,0.000061435996,0.044991497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966537,0.0022229229,0.000060972212,0.00027562608,0.00049292616,0.00029386478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960995,0.0027185886,0.00022119838,0.00038058887,0.000322139,0.0002580026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031988276,0.00039920682,0.00033957878,0.0011149293,0.004150595,0.005387914,0.0008040046,0.0035558715,0.0046361103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006695261,0.00022238052,0.00032631785,0.0006984593,0.046272956,0.007994738,0.0044635567,0.005443337,0.0006508171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021328317,0.0000023871007,0.00002227992,0.000008869332,6.6033743e-7,0.000019168869,0.0015067767,0.000032445172,0.0000130498365,0.99521047,0.0021056682,0.0010760474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054195825,0.00000816911,0.00012091189,0.00006690036,0.0000015127225,0.00006349287,0.0013309172,0.000111261645,0.00005285747,0.910344,0.0878894,0.0000051135275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029152578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030289304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005387914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042277877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026876417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030674875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408377166","doi":"10.1111/mila.12549","title":"Learning from presupposition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind & Language","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Presupposition; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.024644692752510307,"score_gpt":0.2675436541497517,"score_spread":0.24289896139724138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408377166","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12531601,0.0026234502,0.6090083,0.03253677,0.0010160247,0.00011404832,0.00047578587,0.0011557215,0.22775392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933073,0.0013322352,0.051163536,0.0021496725,0.0003471105,0.00007727586,0.0005251241,0.00018405923,0.011147862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975617,0.0012455216,0.0000881807,0.0005966732,0.00039857277,0.0001092679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854742,0.011608368,0.0003725402,0.0016078448,0.0006749342,0.00026212377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037100383,0.000659241,0.00043554275,0.0004760612,0.0013171975,0.0029425398,0.0014424401,0.0018081409,0.011039851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029602528,0.0005262182,0.000678722,0.00039640133,0.0048982254,0.014056205,0.0051288945,0.0045600818,0.002132429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019398135,0.00012356915,0.002867557,0.00036504076,0.00008271968,0.00057447405,0.0047985557,0.0026970187,0.004004855,0.8277257,0.0114190625,0.14514743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001629805,0.000026045253,0.00035762807,0.00005860769,0.000015373604,0.00018843869,0.00036666106,0.0041297744,0.0021904148,0.97996324,0.012672959,0.000014557101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000888929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009773192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011039851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011487582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001087287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03693199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408722686","doi":"10.3819/ccbr.2025.200002","title":"Are You Studying Occasion Setting? A Review for Inquiring Minds","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative cognition; Psychology; Animal behavior; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Neuroscience; Cognition; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.5828025599235268,"score_gpt":0.4896650970985617,"score_spread":0.0931374628249651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408722686","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002308299,0.99894017,0.000048448972,0.0005117043,0.00019712896,0.0000021530914,0.0000068924355,0.0000023867372,0.00026809843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00026476063,0.9983853,0.00012338089,0.00063741475,0.00036570642,0.000008401142,0.000017041712,0.000002049526,0.00019590372],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994697,0.00016250879,0.00010169579,0.000102424514,0.00012459767,0.000039006125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960615,0.00310738,0.00024630618,0.00007148026,0.0003946139,0.00011879913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015297586,0.001237434,0.0020960204,0.006212319,0.00059175235,0.0019397838,0.0013523141,0.0024327303,0.006038402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047468957,0.00064579846,0.0010426437,0.0057645165,0.0018755515,0.004403333,0.0013917199,0.0039254273,0.0026823538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007758873,0.00007588694,0.00033344302,0.050108906,0.00017772388,0.00019592517,0.0005154766,0.00019684983,0.00040405794,0.0117788585,0.08586467,0.85027057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000137397865,0.000055030683,0.0011767106,0.03145514,0.00012694405,0.0007590074,0.00028133244,0.000037413458,0.00008174087,0.008378132,0.9576002,0.000034805897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022688943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038317519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006212319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013957602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023098774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020200431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408733675","doi":"10.1007/s12630-025-02929-z","title":"When our intuition lets us down—something believed to be beneficial may actually be harmful","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; St. Boniface Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Philosophy; Psychology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.03151400182921381,"score_gpt":0.2582160054669556,"score_spread":0.2267020036377418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408733675","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016543549,0.0028864185,0.00011046597,0.028076004,0.967744,0.0000118029075,0.000029240684,0.000021256217,0.0011043283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00045145355,0.004070094,0.0001756705,0.022308243,0.96644187,0.000028086137,0.000020363204,0.00003210249,0.00647208],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99132687,0.0021168166,0.0010702172,0.0007097362,0.0043952893,0.00038113442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9475883,0.035326812,0.0014756137,0.0010791388,0.011902779,0.002627349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011060925,0.0037748325,0.004115343,0.0047077,0.0049271937,0.011064273,0.003545191,0.020411883,0.014417744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063567154,0.0014680366,0.0026571709,0.0022268794,0.005078675,0.0053291363,0.0018558529,0.03397282,0.008960881],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026212078,0.000008333092,0.000018576477,0.00025087025,0.000022623888,0.000073964075,0.000029587252,0.000020201705,0.000034466662,0.0009209544,0.9950688,0.0035254688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009980017,0.000031588934,0.00036104006,0.0012594924,0.00012492784,0.00028420798,0.00019759737,0.00024943752,0.00013228891,0.0060905945,0.99112636,0.000042600128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004465068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014486625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020411883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039644875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062816516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058496475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408923871","doi":"10.1017/epi.2024.64","title":"Safety, Lotteries, and Failures of the Imagination","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Imagination; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.018141313910389006,"score_gpt":0.24552333374629173,"score_spread":0.22738201983590273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408923871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4040549,0.0022667574,0.33048555,0.04042661,0.00023194996,0.00014437629,0.00021968005,0.00036966163,0.22180043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99466527,0.00014057237,0.003550906,0.00029803705,0.000041811934,0.00002587733,0.000020855956,0.000018354378,0.0012382261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920568,0.0050995303,0.00035989154,0.0007182776,0.0012353464,0.00053017546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96183276,0.026325352,0.0029558868,0.0062867184,0.0017473093,0.00085196784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013427212,0.00047869224,0.0007350217,0.0015551826,0.0024662802,0.004597107,0.0015412964,0.0031094458,0.0052862535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033510182,0.0005578681,0.00085762935,0.0006932876,0.03690744,0.013066676,0.005381969,0.0051468136,0.00053345604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003653374,0.000014496627,0.00048346314,0.000033225668,0.000012877875,0.00007424669,0.001320076,0.001896896,0.00012223596,0.9935231,0.00034269283,0.0021400491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008604645,0.00000811657,0.00012856998,0.000013395509,0.0000033885403,0.000025009358,0.0001980713,0.0016663019,0.00011394374,0.9970962,0.0007327178,0.000005836537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014086014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078925275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013427212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026134467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001346978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07101071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409146083","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzae069","title":"<i>The Meaning of</i> If, by Justin Khoo","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.042840520023571936,"score_gpt":0.26548384705780703,"score_spread":0.2226433270342351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409146083","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005082037,0.11235356,0.006856167,0.63500935,0.022955291,0.000024212677,0.00014103795,0.000119507895,0.21745886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46366096,0.058077443,0.007319025,0.24110089,0.036715485,0.0002197158,0.00020895504,0.0006272069,0.19207026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889404,0.0005841377,0.00004594305,0.00019702701,0.00020469326,0.000074140364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801934,0.0015160656,0.00010049166,0.000072663475,0.00020755424,0.00008381744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014189287,0.00045776973,0.00049698295,0.0007800374,0.0039926306,0.005447838,0.00067699095,0.0027176219,0.004516093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00548985,0.00026863877,0.00018707487,0.0010951792,0.015210068,0.007693099,0.002251799,0.008560359,0.0014309651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026795697,0.000013534147,0.00016828756,0.00012207782,0.000009088684,0.00007167386,0.006202513,0.000092115864,0.00010142163,0.74775225,0.23436719,0.011073014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010984757,0.000009463422,0.00039479107,0.0003056108,0.0000058790997,0.00017625092,0.0024068912,0.00022134413,0.00013570207,0.31183228,0.6844758,0.000024967108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007714751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00629167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007714751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021295322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015747487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015450835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409163593","doi":"10.1080/00048402.2025.2481918","title":"Knowledge and the Onslaught of Desire","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0565058951522663,"score_gpt":0.29256044676754855,"score_spread":0.23605455161528227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409163593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03665545,0.0044682864,0.02494152,0.05557564,0.00037974675,0.000026699836,0.000079928235,0.000047671696,0.8778251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678772,0.000975396,0.0023413056,0.0027563246,0.00016233904,0.0000394628,0.000026198444,0.000034199336,0.02578769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950557,0.002697111,0.00014710764,0.0007812396,0.00069288653,0.00062597345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545634,0.0026217436,0.00031892257,0.0008303696,0.0005183441,0.00025422967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006288829,0.00029774237,0.000537387,0.0010903078,0.0058415583,0.008339015,0.0011226803,0.004927301,0.007085712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008246379,0.0004211441,0.00067530136,0.0009740661,0.042898305,0.013317264,0.0056188884,0.0047471593,0.00084499735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044308936,0.0000019639895,0.000034524903,0.0000054220563,0.0000010978889,0.000023893343,0.00097530254,0.00003269039,0.000014401293,0.9978536,0.00036203087,0.0006906101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071633276,0.0000055291857,0.00006746374,0.00003354646,0.0000029157445,0.00006851274,0.0010337685,0.0001538432,0.00007598532,0.97183853,0.02670639,0.000006337883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046809604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041996883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008339015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00592841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028187325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04301387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199590","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.8444","title":"Frustrated and Aware","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Tartu Ülikool","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04706731336458759,"score_gpt":0.2870231179197723,"score_spread":0.23995580455518473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51660293,0.0052126646,0.057029907,0.07008242,0.0012730645,0.00011211475,0.00016534618,0.00018331193,0.34933826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917698,0.00032453687,0.0010922818,0.0025249731,0.0001078538,0.000020803871,0.0000283949,0.000033167125,0.004098237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98617315,0.008144874,0.0005392407,0.0014349984,0.0025216516,0.0011859842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831572,0.007805544,0.003708537,0.0016997468,0.0022723728,0.0013565464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006935836,0.00044983742,0.00055590656,0.00096056424,0.004184252,0.008267859,0.0009041969,0.0027548058,0.005178769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029203316,0.00029713553,0.00048680423,0.0006608567,0.016082006,0.008556567,0.006628256,0.004843968,0.00081301364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003053349,0.00010928818,0.01667207,0.0004620398,0.00013527709,0.0016418119,0.4071143,0.0006868463,0.0048887026,0.5129039,0.010807138,0.04427324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006715833,0.0002116063,0.01647732,0.0007080198,0.0001625882,0.0020191085,0.2594047,0.002994837,0.0030225287,0.47063988,0.24407314,0.00021918523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017089191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010021329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008267859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035864522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015706306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03668064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199671","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.8416","title":"Argumentation, Cooperation, and Disagreement","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0385041081269105,"score_gpt":0.2797476144594394,"score_spread":0.24124350633252892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15731308,0.019519625,0.09694208,0.102135,0.0014766555,0.00024176486,0.00020589826,0.00016640313,0.6219995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98025423,0.0017854443,0.0067923013,0.0013593966,0.00027864662,0.00013519677,0.00007517675,0.000025193547,0.009294353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728205,0.021949967,0.00079338084,0.0014246467,0.0022105325,0.00080103683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9593775,0.032543465,0.0026375307,0.0017392901,0.002494862,0.0012073411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018631564,0.0007099001,0.00082112016,0.0030433596,0.0056081563,0.0105581125,0.0017747579,0.0066228015,0.007519846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036650468,0.00032527887,0.0006669626,0.0027084155,0.021267641,0.009998319,0.008274199,0.0045383414,0.00078109215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054118645,0.00003614091,0.00072122214,0.0001859496,0.000029165547,0.0002941349,0.009700733,0.0017395866,0.000124339,0.9732194,0.0028218832,0.011073283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000334385,0.000017109296,0.00042977568,0.00022099486,0.000012281713,0.00011373996,0.0034806917,0.0024582588,0.00010939026,0.9697813,0.023328086,0.000014983858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014384626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010097639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018631564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006155544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034644722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098534286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409363352","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v39i22.34542","title":"Nuance Matters: Probing Epistemic Consistency in Causal Reasoning","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne","keywords":"Epistemology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Causal reasoning; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Cognition","score_opus":0.10365670077106878,"score_gpt":0.3092672336486346,"score_spread":0.20561053287756584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409363352","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38846955,0.00048510218,0.59047157,0.002569056,0.00007162408,0.00018769689,0.0004450516,0.00094468176,0.016355636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95780516,0.000049842805,0.04125139,0.00012985316,0.000026119684,0.000066202374,0.0002194366,0.00014218027,0.00030972832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709,0.016894685,0.0021152925,0.004609173,0.0046304306,0.00085042114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.711532,0.22357696,0.021238457,0.03151862,0.009938695,0.0021952505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031124627,0.00066325726,0.0012647217,0.004440784,0.0034017344,0.008347813,0.0028798387,0.0024986346,0.0038121014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28419945,0.00088824664,0.0014635168,0.002916525,0.009147225,0.020731146,0.008354309,0.004786344,0.00047455385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012120265,0.0003862181,0.12517394,0.00088615925,0.00061366946,0.0007529775,0.040338982,0.049036518,0.0070066913,0.62687725,0.0018415439,0.14587413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007214939,0.00013013608,0.014998369,0.0001761796,0.00017000419,0.00033547927,0.0038701356,0.12593916,0.005369514,0.84487903,0.003945359,0.00011438855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035909878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002841688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031124627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027200177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023192335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16460472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409654683","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190949945.013.8","title":"Knowledge Attributions and the Social","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07187835229587548,"score_gpt":0.24872806658930435,"score_spread":0.17684971429342888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409654683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31021062,0.0031516752,0.16968349,0.041432485,0.0006376147,0.00019965197,0.00027056082,0.00029448382,0.47411942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99491775,0.00024285165,0.0028005647,0.0001960046,0.000081002785,0.000033196335,0.00003310484,0.000017982627,0.0016775391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9705645,0.01837949,0.0010975245,0.003227806,0.0052398727,0.0014909302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9356264,0.04089078,0.007836214,0.0074103256,0.0054352446,0.0028010893],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022454856,0.0005554439,0.00049411814,0.004477714,0.006366224,0.011531112,0.0022755177,0.0031836033,0.007532832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052341323,0.0006754807,0.0006066363,0.0030707156,0.06438085,0.01769771,0.014107764,0.0038452386,0.0004490964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014718429,0.00002639044,0.0019926347,0.000032435975,0.000017382752,0.000138347,0.022545574,0.00039049922,0.00011431835,0.96715796,0.00049547595,0.0070742043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011921579,0.000014825374,0.0020738156,0.00007929857,0.000014712077,0.00010429208,0.012304107,0.0015330673,0.00019021338,0.9693375,0.014307896,0.00002824922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004557217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023300769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99363375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073615103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004448728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11875403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409661463","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190949945.013.39","title":"Epistemic Contextualism and the Sociality of Knowledge","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Sociality; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.057159959965072275,"score_gpt":0.23521137060041802,"score_spread":0.17805141063534574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409661463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071890354,0.008884083,0.1331539,0.065345205,0.0005473458,0.000085602784,0.00014303008,0.0001695008,0.71978104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98897237,0.000878235,0.005525442,0.0006532965,0.00022709827,0.000055397748,0.00003025904,0.000033272503,0.0036246702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834831,0.012143346,0.00046715525,0.0014495351,0.0017390185,0.0007177951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828042,0.011893165,0.0012948225,0.001978302,0.0014497617,0.0005798314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012108939,0.00048958615,0.00065252976,0.0029348219,0.0063940925,0.011900934,0.0014376362,0.0027800973,0.005079538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013315671,0.00051919377,0.00055252656,0.0020458377,0.06854512,0.01464516,0.009543624,0.003530692,0.00039278116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040584177,0.0000031000593,0.00005319705,0.000018157942,0.000003121916,0.000024263578,0.0033934035,0.000120558994,0.000033410917,0.9949084,0.00019901249,0.0012393149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000555555,0.0000041731146,0.0000990936,0.00006577587,0.0000040562522,0.000023957065,0.0023542095,0.00025569342,0.00008646009,0.9822604,0.014835011,0.000005534846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033384184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002195703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012108939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076498003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040682266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06403893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409776382","doi":"10.1017/apa.2025.12","title":"Disagreement, Public Reason, and Epistemic Abstinence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; McGill University; University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee","keywords":"Legitimacy; Public reason; Politics; Classical liberalism; Liberalism; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Positive economics; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.03106477962561927,"score_gpt":0.26949855813710233,"score_spread":0.23843377851148306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409776382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22055876,0.0027283218,0.08781362,0.123540595,0.0006142879,0.00011728576,0.00018335217,0.00011766981,0.56432605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961676,0.00015463324,0.0010462914,0.0009056637,0.000104615014,0.000035253415,0.000019222873,0.0000123092805,0.0015544008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9679431,0.019364107,0.0014251651,0.0031013882,0.0057315174,0.0024347024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91170365,0.06337542,0.008045326,0.008109516,0.006846249,0.0019198683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026329914,0.00040442962,0.001002107,0.0025656864,0.0083487285,0.010355053,0.002095151,0.008036924,0.00955286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06587747,0.0004008485,0.0008933925,0.0020068858,0.05069373,0.016497897,0.012594012,0.009574087,0.00064940075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017172333,0.000022770744,0.0006879584,0.000032414348,0.0000073650353,0.00007496412,0.0032722505,0.00023716823,0.00004919996,0.993266,0.00067335845,0.0016594563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012718279,0.000007001351,0.0003477555,0.00005700927,0.000005595341,0.0000430998,0.0021370507,0.0005358864,0.0000731555,0.99199307,0.004777652,0.000010027241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019994958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010074636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026329914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059028957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037065572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1392476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409797367","doi":"10.3138/topia-2023-0062","title":"Time, History, Freedom, and the Machiavellian Problem","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06684373785396978,"score_gpt":0.2583511898585836,"score_spread":0.19150745200461378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409797367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077403806,0.02025943,0.01769124,0.07874246,0.0005880781,0.000040833012,0.00007063155,0.000032855933,0.8051706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766616,0.0020509963,0.001967299,0.0019098055,0.0003552346,0.00005194782,0.00002015639,0.00002349233,0.01695948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997815,0.0011275115,0.00007559859,0.000353917,0.00029725934,0.00033067155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984687,0.0008400586,0.00018923475,0.00023595947,0.00009837858,0.000167591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031600778,0.0002779764,0.00040306518,0.0011866337,0.008524665,0.0066259988,0.0009933175,0.0024133413,0.0034137408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034246256,0.0001835268,0.00034498537,0.0010455846,0.065370984,0.008649839,0.004907694,0.003944871,0.00027103545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001533907,0.0000013413751,0.000038108446,0.0000032475134,3.626722e-7,0.0000109700095,0.0014752208,0.000024043384,0.000007213098,0.99755305,0.00018869556,0.000696275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006205599,0.0000042457164,0.00020251906,0.000033136374,0.0000010698693,0.000039213526,0.0019870838,0.00009785079,0.000039019433,0.94889474,0.048689663,0.0000052292576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073513156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065198913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008524665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006614089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030446288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047988772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409834334","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.101912","title":"Same modality, different field: Repositioned, not redefined","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Veterinary Medical Association","funders":"","keywords":"Modality (human–computer interaction); Field (mathematics); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.044939760027195574,"score_gpt":0.342027997293893,"score_spread":0.2970882372666974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409834334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07567433,0.03541578,0.165474,0.30425668,0.0074569825,0.000119796976,0.00019285938,0.00020186756,0.41120765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9553354,0.0033298414,0.017424043,0.012724963,0.0013492334,0.00012072192,0.000045802433,0.00022249225,0.009447588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826401,0.0112991845,0.0007993024,0.0016442137,0.00267037,0.00094687054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806143,0.010433751,0.001314947,0.0032388302,0.0031119662,0.001286162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02157457,0.0004671272,0.0011370573,0.0024319098,0.0074884696,0.015252554,0.0022354447,0.007951805,0.0035235405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028242191,0.0007287088,0.00055072474,0.0017725005,0.118414365,0.03410596,0.009069014,0.015909504,0.0007794177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017891904,0.0000079517595,0.00017578309,0.000030291905,0.000004904266,0.000036345464,0.0069698063,0.000033611625,0.00011857588,0.9869817,0.0013828799,0.0042402614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021214637,0.000017192511,0.00027389568,0.00023686995,0.000013108644,0.0002509741,0.009918208,0.00021618736,0.0002377136,0.95988774,0.028896153,0.000030799572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041503687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037994967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02157457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00554013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009362407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11409861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409984353","doi":"10.1080/13869795.2025.2496817","title":"Self-deception as normative violation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Explorations","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Normative; Psychology; Self-deception; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07557690353509351,"score_gpt":0.3090523426107769,"score_spread":0.2334754390756834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409984353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13083582,0.002661256,0.37133726,0.044092078,0.0009065475,0.0000961528,0.00009623876,0.00016357719,0.4498112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865524,0.00042720526,0.007052733,0.0012213592,0.00017687056,0.00005412422,0.000021975913,0.000033434473,0.004459886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993379,0.0029242602,0.0003510419,0.00064028543,0.0021650167,0.00054039137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857576,0.007177514,0.0017164228,0.0031556468,0.0018505944,0.00034230007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075806235,0.000405007,0.0005188054,0.000904451,0.0019177801,0.004776106,0.0016430286,0.0037426741,0.0018787313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016699653,0.00024285674,0.00051956106,0.00053134403,0.018655607,0.009945223,0.0037237087,0.007478917,0.00039264414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056464837,0.000005214584,0.00016334926,0.000013138838,0.0000019362126,0.000040686642,0.0009734798,0.00029156587,0.000088140405,0.99665904,0.0001488745,0.0016089369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062995714,0.000012237057,0.00023671746,0.000062216306,0.000005017879,0.0001617637,0.0004351603,0.0025859827,0.00039660392,0.9886873,0.00739733,0.0000134054835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011784087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006891382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075806235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017672529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019799336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04009062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410776358","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000493","title":"Beliefs about what disadvantaged groups would do with power shape advantaged groups’ (un)willingness to relinquish it.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada); Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Psychology; Social psychology; Power (physics); Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.04563694342867145,"score_gpt":0.3472128670252905,"score_spread":0.301575923596619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410776358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887877,0.00011696855,0.0006066018,0.0007526533,0.000012946935,0.000012936148,0.00007271426,0.000004194877,0.00963324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99917704,0.000038175873,0.00016199985,0.00007211021,0.000004944508,0.000007801194,0.000026496236,0.0000021736225,0.0005090956],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986539,0.00071547343,0.00005762949,0.00016182657,0.00024317662,0.00016798296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98112136,0.012064694,0.004226339,0.0010313723,0.000548002,0.0010084006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049065487,0.00020862452,0.0001757134,0.0005537717,0.0009791007,0.0020725431,0.00036627866,0.0005404784,0.011619871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018698642,0.00018256408,0.000277063,0.00050583924,0.001799728,0.0012391802,0.0013210601,0.0013612378,0.00057176704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021161987,0.00026179134,0.93528336,0.00008786692,0.00010117529,0.00011000441,0.035391346,0.00022043675,0.0009067673,0.008402719,0.0010400085,0.017982887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047814243,0.00022850877,0.91419774,0.00013393527,0.000088209024,0.00027893487,0.064007826,0.0014682498,0.00072789594,0.014638422,0.0041557825,0.0000266757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029329543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071354043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011619871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071602355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006475124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0388723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410796526","doi":"10.18357/kula.301","title":"Demanding Epistemic Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Johannesburg","keywords":"Epistemology; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.11715493346736171,"score_gpt":0.4203570675310338,"score_spread":0.3032021340636721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410796526","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024248658,0.006155947,0.029451843,0.47953683,0.009847566,0.00011188719,0.00005792045,0.00014446616,0.45044494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8401557,0.0036051446,0.0070067206,0.10031381,0.006567705,0.0002323193,0.00005374714,0.00017171059,0.041893102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96656823,0.017940236,0.0016607116,0.002943436,0.007434259,0.003453136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9540866,0.031905457,0.002332675,0.0036133833,0.0053639733,0.0026977926],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020183919,0.0004863372,0.00075062865,0.0010427734,0.017371692,0.015216762,0.0022027094,0.013468143,0.005031053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053160205,0.00030450037,0.00090995803,0.0007749064,0.055064864,0.018753203,0.014319426,0.013944345,0.0012536979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012639905,0.00001454668,0.00015726393,0.00012299675,0.000005327842,0.00027137317,0.042362716,0.00007921654,0.00016719518,0.93583775,0.013658835,0.0073101544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012412019,0.000018349707,0.00028043834,0.00055575004,0.000009183787,0.00032652126,0.031607505,0.00018448872,0.00036361764,0.60911787,0.357495,0.000028801785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044204323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055950405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9826283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069640623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014888667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10674405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411274175","doi":"10.1007/s10670-025-00977-x","title":"Epistemic Rationality Begins Unreflectively","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Rationality; Ontology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05687095642354797,"score_gpt":0.3090321360568537,"score_spread":0.25216117963330575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411274175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21246696,0.0033846223,0.21850394,0.034823135,0.00036098747,0.00010524056,0.0001459338,0.00049565814,0.5297135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97883976,0.00036128427,0.012415086,0.0007683157,0.00006855071,0.00004447652,0.00003577615,0.000085900065,0.00738088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924861,0.00346141,0.0003802594,0.0013654975,0.0016078948,0.00069876574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874094,0.007440505,0.0008799961,0.0024179397,0.0015138297,0.00033830444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074705724,0.00047646704,0.0005232849,0.0013397869,0.002391559,0.0058662863,0.00094530336,0.0024909521,0.003023333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017874595,0.00045818667,0.0005705315,0.00049080775,0.036831666,0.009985465,0.00656932,0.0050247484,0.00068108377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009977922,0.000006164679,0.0003169219,0.000025911284,0.000005508745,0.000098710145,0.007438254,0.00013006399,0.0003517919,0.9871732,0.00028386866,0.004159643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046847604,0.000006802954,0.00022749868,0.00003711063,0.0000046854084,0.00007370005,0.0012338499,0.0002598731,0.00041277966,0.98562443,0.012106921,0.0000077186505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015629014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010494201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074705724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027840976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002347746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03950864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411420836","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2025.2519272","title":"“Epistemic Blame and Positive Epistemic Norms: On Ichikawa’s <i>Epistemic Courage</i> ”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Courage; Blame; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.06230323943560859,"score_gpt":0.3444219502833311,"score_spread":0.28211871084772255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411420836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031756893,0.009581782,0.09067632,0.17884877,0.0030379265,0.00010317485,0.00003825006,0.00009739069,0.6858595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93815094,0.0038739967,0.013120119,0.014613606,0.0013082236,0.00021322981,0.000020901753,0.000085832304,0.028613042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633265,0.0020331182,0.00010376078,0.0003908185,0.0008881819,0.00025142066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922569,0.0051300675,0.0005487169,0.0004543456,0.0012962002,0.0003138085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006970876,0.00063816545,0.00043266654,0.0011593866,0.0046245,0.004856583,0.0017066525,0.0037094161,0.0028325121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016973794,0.00032033614,0.0003638236,0.0008327656,0.036992483,0.010929882,0.0061815428,0.0066490606,0.0005846775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010912324,0.000005724794,0.00009838623,0.000030282485,0.0000020456655,0.0000696358,0.0061564776,0.000083303086,0.000055607517,0.98698723,0.0034133927,0.003086961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000097200955,0.000015912254,0.00034519396,0.00016722173,0.000008698981,0.00007798523,0.0028376202,0.0006156013,0.00026255538,0.9482024,0.047432385,0.000024697782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003808078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050332397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006970876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030961786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003152966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03686601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411426840","doi":"10.1017/s1477175625000168","title":"Vice-Charging and Epistemic Vices of Consequence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Think","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Domain (mathematical analysis); Vice president; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Psychology; Mathematics; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.040367214234454614,"score_gpt":0.27684798149628,"score_spread":0.23648076726182538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411426840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073550604,0.0026802602,0.17930037,0.031708952,0.0011893451,0.00007665738,0.000063080704,0.00024715895,0.7111835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98714256,0.00045206028,0.0048111454,0.0014047273,0.00022375662,0.00003897897,0.000011375855,0.00006034194,0.0058550625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803082,0.012727682,0.0008793431,0.0020281598,0.0025095872,0.0015469939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761362,0.013538059,0.0015632169,0.005244254,0.0024552848,0.0010629179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02080496,0.00052772637,0.001088849,0.0022444136,0.006749751,0.010842448,0.0014591007,0.0041259136,0.0075670783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03131912,0.0005486808,0.0010008953,0.001738242,0.071688145,0.015883062,0.009934571,0.0074062315,0.00067034026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040782998,0.0000019310212,0.00007647297,0.000009047776,0.0000029651055,0.000022853605,0.00067793345,0.000060768838,0.000023363722,0.99787533,0.00024152736,0.0010037138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006564621,0.000006809202,0.000115066934,0.000058259775,0.000006782759,0.00006448308,0.0008193559,0.00030407772,0.00013609898,0.9837572,0.014713959,0.000011289994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017223844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001436525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02080496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039196257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028050547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110028446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411747412","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2025.2521673","title":"Group respect","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.1127039417008866,"score_gpt":0.32857921477529106,"score_spread":0.21587527307440446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411747412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016173707,0.0011467513,0.02416809,0.01916582,0.00077761826,0.00010470921,0.000098444965,0.00011898081,0.9382459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8590153,0.0007813813,0.0069538965,0.008809243,0.0004964513,0.00016748784,0.00017122309,0.0001660053,0.12343903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99257046,0.002857237,0.0003589738,0.0017388705,0.0015260774,0.00094844715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961169,0.00090022164,0.00043785872,0.0013756712,0.00070469093,0.00046481867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005134983,0.00048520876,0.00046067373,0.00086928747,0.0056170635,0.0076358262,0.0010901116,0.0035930204,0.01980157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0093454,0.0002205647,0.0006127003,0.00068124477,0.025291814,0.010647598,0.008151741,0.003995093,0.0035682367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006699122,0.0000044489457,0.00020314149,0.000018303424,0.0000028756428,0.0000224554,0.003629322,0.000027707914,0.0000762221,0.98798984,0.0028264876,0.005192396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010620373,0.000034479548,0.0004966123,0.00009665548,0.000009044495,0.00012533882,0.004814555,0.000095054485,0.00023594697,0.6832437,0.3108244,0.000013649762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026093507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002411433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01980157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029165181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026462337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066242814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411750739","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i2.9636","title":"Meta-Arguments, Para-Arguments, and Intentionally Bad Arguments","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11482985345442225,"score_gpt":0.30106749596354343,"score_spread":0.18623764250912117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411750739","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06591208,0.014807398,0.4063687,0.12070399,0.0016486672,0.00024157898,0.00022883112,0.00043432115,0.38965446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92514104,0.0019724718,0.055377316,0.005315191,0.00085508596,0.00037494334,0.00009150815,0.0003879587,0.010484509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95661676,0.030324811,0.0017739035,0.0038063882,0.005549259,0.0019288844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90668714,0.071154,0.0069518634,0.010215011,0.0030788898,0.0019130647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037431464,0.0012663146,0.0015051428,0.005254398,0.007087638,0.016173968,0.0026575525,0.011818131,0.0069550066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066160195,0.0011519069,0.0016133278,0.003831992,0.05469407,0.036256775,0.011383465,0.012606363,0.0010945325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008569628,0.000004842279,0.00014962292,0.00003185276,0.0000076890365,0.000068852634,0.0015695735,0.000051244773,0.000046684356,0.9965193,0.00046906492,0.0010726942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010691509,0.000007346828,0.00009155539,0.000115196286,0.000010548703,0.00013710328,0.0011973324,0.0004372377,0.00019830829,0.9828712,0.014913695,0.0000097284465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054953207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061416544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037431464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058393436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025151705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19795889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412273931","doi":"","title":"Nyere nordisk retsfilosofi","year":2011,"lang":"da","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.25053028516820985,"score_gpt":0.2873043208233573,"score_spread":0.03677403565514742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412273931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030335465,0.09760463,0.012594659,0.0470682,0.016817566,0.00018081443,0.007483811,0.000879459,0.7870354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24472971,0.038947552,0.02062438,0.0025566714,0.0012113166,0.000303693,0.0045906682,0.000892603,0.68614346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963108,0.0010334114,0.0003324765,0.00071245426,0.0011787069,0.00043229744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973705,0.00074350514,0.00024473507,0.00038972896,0.0008642611,0.0003873163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045524063,0.001548472,0.0016657597,0.0032121742,0.004774246,0.012718438,0.0012156676,0.002950275,0.049467757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005928107,0.0008108226,0.0006171445,0.0016622524,0.0028604036,0.0048311837,0.004943119,0.0044435887,0.017562076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003825686,0.00016259188,0.002160541,0.0017248989,0.00006823021,0.0014493437,0.008150352,0.0011035842,0.002076733,0.6000671,0.20195486,0.18069914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003088353,0.000014810111,0.0010712771,0.00086326414,0.00001898005,0.00027711169,0.0019451538,0.0002359216,0.000752046,0.023688316,0.9710742,0.000028152535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025790004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024956545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049467757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008101911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0131645715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16548616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412910056","doi":"10.1007/s11229-025-05167-4","title":"Inferentialism and collaged assertions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of language; Philosophy of science; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Programming language; Computer science","score_opus":0.03634273392466699,"score_gpt":0.27989537609713594,"score_spread":0.24355264217246894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412910056","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049774352,0.010317632,0.5233374,0.05513796,0.0024644593,0.00020985983,0.0008419785,0.0003546534,0.3575617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.889159,0.0028899556,0.08720592,0.0020892983,0.0014206253,0.0003225159,0.0005189314,0.00023818351,0.016155506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98058516,0.0135686565,0.000938524,0.0018670511,0.0024550399,0.0005855036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9305468,0.056417763,0.0018779238,0.006642324,0.0039946027,0.00052060204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01975064,0.00100896,0.0011216599,0.0054211016,0.004543122,0.012421638,0.003677321,0.0038258953,0.01886587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072530344,0.000906684,0.0011899536,0.004402658,0.026086599,0.022225391,0.0069565414,0.0060216775,0.0020472957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016275097,0.000008293771,0.000062820545,0.000058158214,0.0000117794425,0.000060803213,0.0017436228,0.00016160651,0.000028300292,0.99459285,0.0006851209,0.0025703015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070324613,0.0000024640701,0.00003433202,0.000107945176,0.000008042859,0.000028849428,0.0006261073,0.0005380726,0.00013351727,0.9928913,0.0056185946,0.0000037007683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011378776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011499433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01975064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00459972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031326578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10445261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413291949","doi":"10.1017/epi.2025.10066","title":"Contractualism and Moral Disagreement","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Contractualism; Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.054624415589601946,"score_gpt":0.27772789356566324,"score_spread":0.22310347797606128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413291949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11840308,0.0026491813,0.15964785,0.07870231,0.0006885958,0.0001193368,0.000100258956,0.00011817099,0.6395711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882929,0.00026839535,0.004797694,0.0013946508,0.0001754597,0.00005801114,0.000023557883,0.000027395989,0.0049619325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9710872,0.018888233,0.000991659,0.0022765659,0.0050739227,0.0016824586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9699033,0.020490117,0.0022554677,0.0031874331,0.003044912,0.0011188589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025868177,0.00038385307,0.00068592135,0.0017658047,0.0083738025,0.009256439,0.0021982472,0.006664346,0.0061184587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033508785,0.00040746437,0.0006793487,0.0016339133,0.059572767,0.012088569,0.00895846,0.0076797726,0.0005265122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032399944,0.000003954176,0.00006124847,0.000007905565,0.0000013496044,0.000021040152,0.0015048161,0.00012137808,0.000019669325,0.9973832,0.00022724796,0.0006450166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063676957,0.0000034898148,0.000059400933,0.000029963041,0.0000017971859,0.000026393089,0.00079577306,0.00063801545,0.000058392292,0.992018,0.0063573173,0.0000051587044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022322393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010317365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025868177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008144761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004745114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13680565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W44134613","doi":"","title":"Commentary on Barron","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.05452034162860032,"score_gpt":0.23837280973849523,"score_spread":0.18385246810989492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W44134613","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009170549,0.006393899,0.00017371206,0.9515933,0.0382233,0.00000505737,0.0000262292,0.000014398152,0.0034783324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031144877,0.0030988415,0.00025274802,0.9548028,0.033304147,0.000043579934,0.000015069974,0.00005669554,0.005311744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818138,0.0069600996,0.0010882725,0.003858815,0.00503606,0.0012429878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90976673,0.069307126,0.0017248719,0.0020742714,0.012811822,0.0043151905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02211634,0.0016685089,0.003187731,0.002584464,0.013700247,0.012065522,0.0074412124,0.059230417,0.015224253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10173816,0.0013397518,0.0018633682,0.002839885,0.025076587,0.02241974,0.007436597,0.11070157,0.009394534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022230515,0.0000078547455,0.000042751657,0.00007530519,0.00000659655,0.00014657302,0.0007628001,0.000021281541,0.000020915048,0.019162267,0.97625947,0.003472046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002298046,0.000010494425,0.0001463247,0.0010187929,0.000011773975,0.00026754747,0.0012521563,0.00007841218,0.00007541451,0.03194909,0.96511394,0.000053001815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024457954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025840256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059230417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013692196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011692541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116963804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413876466","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10019","title":"Bergmann’s Intuitions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; General interest","score_opus":0.0776643556991139,"score_gpt":0.25904500497105193,"score_spread":0.18138064927193803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413876466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01302435,0.0022460627,0.1259364,0.028826684,0.0009748695,0.000084437466,0.00033837144,0.00019231143,0.8283765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91984767,0.0015445633,0.03770515,0.0058956314,0.00078435807,0.00025199627,0.00022704889,0.0001387411,0.033604823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99258435,0.0031066719,0.0004514406,0.0012879813,0.0019704315,0.000599128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99445915,0.0028196108,0.0003414743,0.00081901683,0.0013355331,0.00022523824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00833302,0.0008252622,0.00077741634,0.0030497874,0.0025134399,0.0052546826,0.0016371966,0.0027947393,0.011915448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015686426,0.0005380295,0.0010980055,0.0013794623,0.015887726,0.009141281,0.0033113067,0.0031817046,0.0017201353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002634449,0.000002059421,0.000014197517,0.000009043548,0.0000018600512,0.0000069448415,0.00014408799,0.00011847212,0.000010976505,0.9980647,0.0009973081,0.0006277907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004524842,0.0000019135502,0.000029403205,0.000020111454,0.000002886315,0.000012877495,0.000078846984,0.00046299046,0.00003457718,0.99111474,0.008233348,0.0000038336048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003914794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024554795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011915448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005460396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026304666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044069707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413968291","doi":"10.1007/s42330-025-00385-x","title":"Beyond Blind Trust and Informed Trust: Earned Trust? A Critique of Osborne and Allchin (2024)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Science education; Psychology; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020367193541937247,"score_gpt":0.28653409422347204,"score_spread":0.2661669006815348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413968291","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007925083,0.012205464,0.014205246,0.8416813,0.0017538669,0.000058224985,0.000110056426,0.000034166507,0.12202654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8011252,0.0056337276,0.006400242,0.16196787,0.00260318,0.00033373016,0.00003693653,0.00011802928,0.02178107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98162144,0.010093694,0.0008029861,0.0020276674,0.003982864,0.0014713629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95564294,0.03259605,0.0020797097,0.0026620687,0.0054493635,0.0015698973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022512874,0.0009257963,0.0016717123,0.0027529697,0.011837063,0.0161053,0.004309995,0.03600245,0.0053441375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05096952,0.0008303888,0.0008930699,0.0029498658,0.12160479,0.02928355,0.009861783,0.03176907,0.0011419534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006607175,0.000003815332,0.00003585128,0.000022553275,0.0000028463157,0.000023918936,0.0035157856,0.000034564917,0.0000068563804,0.9891611,0.005994869,0.0011912929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015957043,0.000003472835,0.00009992412,0.00019798888,0.0000061353835,0.000054625285,0.0019528563,0.00013585493,0.000051721534,0.96094096,0.036523536,0.000017035241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05035917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038243804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05035917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020931264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021500058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15186769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414240826","doi":"10.22329/cjpp.v8i1.7796","title":"Preface to Volume 8 (2022)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Practical Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Range (aeronautics)","score_opus":0.09953812264309043,"score_gpt":0.29096015140746273,"score_spread":0.1914220287643723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414240826","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032587448,0.00724044,0.00087964843,0.02134933,0.80383044,0.00020346577,0.002570436,0.00057987275,0.16302054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030433189,0.005691967,0.0007602552,0.014513051,0.29427117,0.0003419963,0.0041546607,0.0009089988,0.6763145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774015,0.00025422964,0.00016357028,0.0002478854,0.0013905914,0.00020357194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893678,0.0011345206,0.0004886926,0.00056078174,0.006810419,0.0016377427],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022317225,0.0015540001,0.0010567623,0.005163933,0.0027183236,0.008430127,0.0014949981,0.0025771728,0.32447696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011009162,0.0004293916,0.0009618354,0.003313898,0.0007045288,0.0027454123,0.0026176649,0.0034443815,0.2789192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012054575,0.0000057795855,0.000023975623,0.00005993977,9.3731666e-7,0.000014581209,0.00000838699,0.000014497295,0.000059063812,0.00038987809,0.991217,0.008193815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051736865,0.000012231695,0.0002604693,0.00013215875,0.0000016153838,0.000029939532,0.000024938572,0.000026516305,0.00005022571,0.00061664137,0.9988349,0.0000051605098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003640929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005192089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32447696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026796244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027634522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96355164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414240837","doi":"10.22329/cjpp.v12i1.10468","title":"MacIntyre, Moore and the Fact-Value Distinction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Practical Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Proposition; Key (lock); Compatibilism; Consequentialism; Incompatibilism","score_opus":0.05580748947750942,"score_gpt":0.291186149047623,"score_spread":0.2353786595701136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414240837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024136472,0.03733772,0.11796039,0.23681346,0.0016160161,0.00014646717,0.000266971,0.00013825596,0.5815842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8644824,0.012280064,0.04834953,0.024533706,0.0026623928,0.00042458661,0.00007791006,0.00017661758,0.04701273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962359,0.001968406,0.0001512329,0.00055008155,0.00080392684,0.00029051577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991561,0.0060736495,0.00065433804,0.0006520171,0.0006938876,0.00036515092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050668158,0.00069552,0.00089557254,0.0029353243,0.0047576604,0.008225627,0.0015462759,0.005386892,0.0055817803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011399371,0.0006601309,0.0008960258,0.0024066693,0.042160917,0.014256434,0.0034916026,0.007703797,0.0009166651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003339882,0.000003568731,0.00002688526,0.000014554001,0.0000016947567,0.000016797672,0.0006000166,0.000059000282,0.000014910695,0.9963923,0.0017996345,0.0010673689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005175354,0.0000053225344,0.00008563478,0.000052088788,0.0000031923803,0.00004213333,0.00023128338,0.00017661737,0.000054030097,0.96758515,0.031752594,0.0000068007466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006155585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048685973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008225627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062262975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028559964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045175195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414331524","doi":"10.1111/japp.70050","title":"The Epistemic Harms of Botched Apologies for Past Wrongs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation; Public Health Agency of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Silence; Reciprocal; Exploit; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.049895031536452535,"score_gpt":0.2816146781738573,"score_spread":0.2317196466374048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414331524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38753444,0.0023729196,0.16810565,0.066469185,0.0016826325,0.00022301498,0.00006763478,0.0006820026,0.37286243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888997,0.0001592364,0.003629816,0.0014606252,0.000100858844,0.000041413983,0.000006371867,0.00006120409,0.0056407573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810893,0.011352161,0.0006735141,0.001541312,0.0040404117,0.0013032339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9400725,0.040591,0.0045169047,0.00995337,0.0037141663,0.0011520045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020232486,0.00043801634,0.0005139864,0.0014002209,0.006800549,0.008205435,0.0019797487,0.010256755,0.0053046667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0672864,0.0005584536,0.0006917356,0.0005460971,0.033581473,0.013236143,0.011101165,0.009219034,0.0008285764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074805816,0.00006141598,0.00081945467,0.000088728426,0.000030547122,0.0012882239,0.04263373,0.0008495551,0.0011102278,0.9381733,0.0033691346,0.011500856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028054561,0.00006030263,0.00063209183,0.0003216315,0.00003593236,0.00088587706,0.013812483,0.0027173853,0.0021307652,0.9465537,0.032758713,0.0000631442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007829093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010057789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020232486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031646308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002827197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10700089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414394958","doi":"10.1007/s10670-025-01016-5","title":"What Good Are Knowledge Norms?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Canada First Research Excellence Fund","keywords":"Normative; Norm (philosophy); Ontology; Ask price; Social knowledge; Social ontology","score_opus":0.05003477379501068,"score_gpt":0.29401917793687593,"score_spread":0.24398440414186526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414394958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06994234,0.026759123,0.13181092,0.32915342,0.002456053,0.00013757488,0.00052572123,0.00039013167,0.43882474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96524054,0.00404054,0.018068293,0.006812211,0.0015471294,0.0002295665,0.00015513883,0.00015904398,0.003747617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93894774,0.038716078,0.003265377,0.004843402,0.012003305,0.0022241469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77253866,0.16678399,0.017609116,0.017846327,0.020345498,0.0048763445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045140587,0.00078596396,0.002003647,0.0055301148,0.006173089,0.024105564,0.002875831,0.008270432,0.005688819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15465194,0.00071186875,0.00067503983,0.0032519319,0.06216523,0.04672398,0.004867138,0.0069493772,0.0012572196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021829284,0.000026167452,0.00073179154,0.00011997111,0.000023022681,0.000021115582,0.002572403,0.0001800832,0.00005125357,0.98349965,0.0019923446,0.010760369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009334955,0.000005326069,0.00025175276,0.00015642704,0.0000080982145,0.000020118001,0.0016124727,0.00022899955,0.00007864994,0.99100715,0.006611113,0.000010562486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004095014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034767238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045140587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061828555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008522139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23872906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414525063","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.70008","title":"Duality in skepticism: Contrasting judgment and action","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Operationalization; Audit; Action (physics); Psychological intervention","score_opus":0.2942926657219079,"score_gpt":0.42199698847462525,"score_spread":0.12770432275271737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414525063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9059285,0.00047626425,0.032716073,0.0033829124,0.00009420056,0.00011637065,0.000025183364,0.000040012907,0.057220455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973967,0.00003835355,0.0021853081,0.00018075973,0.000009760136,0.000032733245,0.000004762221,0.0000050347644,0.00014649151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9359944,0.04606971,0.001982701,0.003183233,0.01114328,0.0016267593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7953097,0.1550381,0.027414026,0.011138756,0.0075077903,0.0035916397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031482678,0.0003586694,0.0005405312,0.0020905652,0.0016602625,0.0077606533,0.0010515287,0.0024425918,0.0025850243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14140998,0.0005652598,0.00052156666,0.0008486475,0.015094631,0.0049185087,0.00643752,0.00390273,0.00016119405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028236764,0.0013217852,0.17050563,0.001564796,0.0003331214,0.0011520237,0.22294235,0.0048239348,0.031764634,0.45297453,0.0013975748,0.108395934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004310998,0.0012836455,0.2648241,0.0013491495,0.00026910778,0.0014452358,0.08759731,0.015529269,0.014144657,0.5992434,0.013481814,0.00040127814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010128244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008143434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031482678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034259735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029298533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1664983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414692400","doi":"10.1215/00318108-11964820","title":"A Dominance Argument Against Incompleteness","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Argument (complex analysis); Outcome (game theory); Ex-ante; Ranking (information retrieval); Dominance (genetics)","score_opus":0.09144817609546423,"score_gpt":0.3230929386317196,"score_spread":0.23164476253625538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414692400","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037386585,0.012263194,0.68832946,0.043769713,0.0006982883,0.000110512556,0.00036986105,0.00012123524,0.21695116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89185244,0.005720598,0.06953351,0.008852926,0.0017261808,0.0004318772,0.00024429773,0.00013748223,0.021500746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98559374,0.0073831985,0.0006044077,0.0015088622,0.004102379,0.00080748094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96883374,0.022298478,0.0018120618,0.0027160924,0.0036077641,0.00073186896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018296167,0.0008220953,0.0014487298,0.0016446923,0.0019928766,0.003950513,0.0018328748,0.0024042903,0.0060135005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027979806,0.0006228443,0.0015203984,0.0011136231,0.010425833,0.011422651,0.004418982,0.0061481562,0.0007773997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073925526,0.000006605076,0.00010108321,0.000051659234,0.000015791202,0.000022419114,0.00013790108,0.0007963673,0.00007136319,0.9936226,0.0008102258,0.0043566553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010488803,0.000009456723,0.000081992795,0.000048918082,0.0000075120975,0.000035533416,0.00003325654,0.001014024,0.000104650986,0.9917489,0.006899155,0.000006000669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012381409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000999109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018296167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034478991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030310322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09676051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414970603","doi":"10.1007/s11098-025-02418-5","title":"Bearing Witness, Understanding, Knowledge and the Right to be Known","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Argument (complex analysis); Injustice; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Bearing (navigation); Philosophy of mind","score_opus":0.19919867103325528,"score_gpt":0.34532894024963345,"score_spread":0.14613026921637817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414970603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062387455,0.008134789,0.034677934,0.13015166,0.0012214588,0.00006203624,0.00014219803,0.000051583247,0.76317096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680454,0.002379827,0.0036837163,0.004279044,0.00044238436,0.000037357466,0.000050084444,0.000041836505,0.021040374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98625606,0.008597754,0.00063011487,0.0015176501,0.0017858744,0.0012125123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9627775,0.025491454,0.0026162728,0.005154295,0.0021895499,0.0017710017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018688146,0.00041219548,0.0009042353,0.0018370058,0.008771112,0.014693454,0.001683352,0.008706884,0.015259739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041899905,0.0004974477,0.000439056,0.0014166401,0.09388118,0.025875455,0.010253551,0.009115243,0.0013391294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009808389,0.000010159319,0.0002121385,0.000033060533,0.00000402724,0.000052659707,0.00761067,0.00005164561,0.00007153808,0.9881045,0.0010738212,0.0027659608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011112183,0.0000074366058,0.0001559331,0.0001470522,0.0000059747567,0.000088599074,0.006386158,0.00006554278,0.00014858907,0.9665337,0.026439112,0.000010704179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050633242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033987858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018688146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028283927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066795754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0988335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415098404","doi":"10.1111/papq.70004","title":"Pulling Down the Hierarchy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Meaning (existential); Focus (optics); Value (mathematics); Word (group theory)","score_opus":0.04134218617910647,"score_gpt":0.2678413251231641,"score_spread":0.22649913894405765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415098404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099341564,0.002703766,0.16040541,0.04386983,0.0013601694,0.0001371892,0.00028764058,0.0005145535,0.69137985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93725294,0.0009041473,0.03017247,0.00360791,0.0004714662,0.000103518294,0.00014611958,0.00031382375,0.027027493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99439937,0.0023665049,0.00024746047,0.00084402616,0.0015308138,0.0006116925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99260825,0.002992631,0.0004916042,0.001622711,0.0016163369,0.0006684108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004414024,0.0007030331,0.0007019282,0.0025661453,0.005122942,0.0071908874,0.0012717176,0.0026042515,0.0144321015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012721917,0.00062529783,0.00072655716,0.0015364921,0.023085194,0.018306151,0.008657423,0.0056747734,0.0023458905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014866721,0.0000067543506,0.00033967412,0.000042957574,0.000005582438,0.000068408575,0.0054188636,0.00013979005,0.00037773635,0.98530734,0.0020917128,0.006186304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015367306,0.0000182398,0.00026129387,0.000099417164,0.0000103684515,0.000075598415,0.0025727113,0.00072044384,0.00032199646,0.9487522,0.04713896,0.0000134793345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065242266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006753134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144321015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004048558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028922614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04828018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415604132","doi":"10.5840/idpp2009/2010163","title":"Countries Included","year":2009,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Directory of Philosophy and Philosophers","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Government (linguistics); Information system; Developed country","score_opus":0.06193190440709293,"score_gpt":0.3078542651100662,"score_spread":0.24592236070297327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415604132","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002875298,0.0033843138,0.00046682134,0.0006407876,0.002018292,0.00024770925,0.7166575,0.00075292477,0.27295634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022878373,0.00689105,0.0019268208,0.0010517727,0.00041094984,0.0006566703,0.6454292,0.00078093645,0.3199742],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984261,0.00012527223,0.00022796642,0.00030917657,0.0005542842,0.00035727024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958509,0.00027370657,0.00060730084,0.0003150548,0.0026728618,0.0002801335],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050448475,0.0009925583,0.001092663,0.008077519,0.0013829792,0.0029958838,0.00096463173,0.00060811534,0.25706995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034439543,0.00037738006,0.00045804013,0.025623437,0.00027327682,0.0017083042,0.0013168881,0.0011306873,0.18606618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011952369,0.000019445113,0.0022376738,0.0010380127,0.000023653858,0.00007893731,0.0001548929,0.00008235342,0.00022884001,0.007616051,0.96823823,0.0201623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011930584,0.000006750591,0.0049452367,0.00019204612,0.000008191557,0.000035608096,0.0001993761,0.0000106969965,0.00013347506,0.00020143887,0.9942503,0.00000488755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06524947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058345195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74293005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012832137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004160892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85998464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415981529","doi":"10.1017/epi.2025.10088","title":"Curiosity and Mental Search","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Curiosity; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Norm (philosophy); Metacognition","score_opus":0.0496375096589411,"score_gpt":0.2948370538143552,"score_spread":0.24519954415541412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415981529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5342668,0.00858177,0.084450655,0.03045724,0.0001565702,0.0001667891,0.0002166541,0.00028977467,0.34141374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945076,0.00052524795,0.0030400136,0.0003186472,0.000024067514,0.000018578134,0.000031913758,0.00002227391,0.001511564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606776,0.0019795508,0.00019551907,0.0006299398,0.0008618187,0.0002652871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9749708,0.017296566,0.0031127569,0.002017578,0.0017182326,0.0008840353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004728719,0.00030158492,0.0004650282,0.0017199198,0.0012843644,0.005440867,0.0011500907,0.0016994389,0.0070967274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029905224,0.00034574085,0.00048575783,0.0009373767,0.013753861,0.008094009,0.0052578715,0.0023029682,0.00043765345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118594675,0.000082687395,0.00584532,0.0005654944,0.00013110318,0.000380493,0.03144533,0.0024861582,0.002005433,0.92261285,0.0021493663,0.03217707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029612924,0.000028846716,0.0022686685,0.00013118974,0.000027384707,0.00019443674,0.0032786883,0.0031039643,0.00065375975,0.97997004,0.010284654,0.000028816361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001563208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075841014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070967274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00221312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001482976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025008142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416132973","doi":"10.1007/s11229-025-05342-7","title":"Justification does not aggregate: de-generalizing the lottery paradox","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Reductio ad absurdum; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of science; Metaphysics; Probabilistic logic; Conjunction (astronomy)","score_opus":0.05240397940437524,"score_gpt":0.2845809836993515,"score_spread":0.23217700429497623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416132973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08602365,0.0045652986,0.3972003,0.0799846,0.0021026523,0.0001446077,0.0004851478,0.0004196651,0.4290741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93921626,0.0009576021,0.046259098,0.003499407,0.00075881404,0.00015155772,0.00018041849,0.00026771956,0.008709206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99455714,0.00324926,0.00023863369,0.00090420776,0.0006786818,0.00037209058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98366123,0.009493559,0.00088570704,0.0040293075,0.0015023871,0.00042787616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008067435,0.0008526231,0.0016654015,0.0030139992,0.003436598,0.006267033,0.0024992109,0.0043791565,0.013368067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030452669,0.0005747429,0.0014003555,0.0023163655,0.018622236,0.016588291,0.0058572395,0.005891683,0.0013814567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058304286,0.000004670819,0.000034523153,0.000018858565,0.0000059971767,0.00001761371,0.000254283,0.00026823563,0.000022895267,0.9971922,0.0005677474,0.0016072068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033881845,0.0000010982258,0.00002041942,0.0000128078555,0.0000026193998,0.0000100676025,0.00007610577,0.0005002205,0.000019885418,0.99801314,0.0013379027,0.000002317992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019584657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021017152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013368067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032102084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034714774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04472065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416965781","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2524788122","title":"Reply to Neveu and Neveu: Inference in an information-restricted environment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Feature (linguistics); Interpretation (philosophy); Stability (learning theory)","score_opus":0.07094397723564619,"score_gpt":0.3159769722627033,"score_spread":0.24503299502705714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416965781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012498825,0.0010303102,0.0004050343,0.98636615,0.01174502,0.000005696105,0.00004247987,0.000028373765,0.00025198548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0041730213,0.0006596158,0.0008840869,0.9682102,0.025364535,0.00005115555,0.000016469987,0.000043753997,0.0005971734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96113044,0.021276642,0.0032392687,0.0055214656,0.007584615,0.001247603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57426476,0.37677273,0.00650634,0.008883077,0.02917696,0.0043961545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061561238,0.0016199913,0.0044916435,0.0026236984,0.0068500093,0.0074460567,0.010135251,0.05466949,0.0045850826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32114744,0.0013319358,0.0026672133,0.0034369149,0.022847246,0.018645877,0.005755947,0.0868981,0.0031033636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055775905,0.00001694838,0.00031522842,0.0001291731,0.00004630737,0.00029154643,0.00085658353,0.00011729398,0.000047381516,0.014016007,0.9798431,0.004264701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022128724,0.00007813502,0.0017172748,0.0016021528,0.00018989136,0.0016369971,0.0037073998,0.0027233558,0.00075216097,0.15694793,0.8299484,0.00047506517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01269674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009310369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061561238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00678746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006557281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32557088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417315573","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v30i7.3854","title":"Reframing Epistemic Partiality: A Case for Acceptance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Rationality; Analogy; Philosophy of science; Doxastic logic; Cognition; Friendship; Dimension (graph theory)","score_opus":0.15584821091684672,"score_gpt":0.37081291333517863,"score_spread":0.2149647024183319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417315573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31669053,0.002363468,0.1708941,0.13465914,0.00075427885,0.00013988488,0.00006889543,0.00029468542,0.374135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99316096,0.00013873339,0.0028008015,0.0014613728,0.00013754814,0.000044957873,0.000010394284,0.000046217017,0.0021990223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834479,0.008880305,0.0007081631,0.002115598,0.003035926,0.0018121187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738227,0.015012913,0.0018618248,0.005253639,0.0026539501,0.0013950008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015360097,0.0005546059,0.00097654294,0.0015114797,0.008562564,0.011805809,0.0023781327,0.0089532705,0.0048751147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037983917,0.00062043825,0.0012183737,0.0010136864,0.057441752,0.023883209,0.012838214,0.013675502,0.00068520557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020326777,0.000013915168,0.00045793763,0.000023392698,0.000008172898,0.00027000494,0.02025782,0.00008870095,0.00018269605,0.97447205,0.0004967349,0.003708317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001772978,0.000024984309,0.00027490358,0.000056997884,0.000015266049,0.00029206957,0.0068547823,0.00080245826,0.00021300047,0.9796832,0.011743042,0.000021618343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002330537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015016583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015360097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003219952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023739089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081232965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4466147","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-2363-4_13","title":"Towards a Philosophy of Argument","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Argumentation library","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Argument map; Variety (cybernetics); Confusion; Construct (python library); Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08732303712556261,"score_gpt":0.2476586354953577,"score_spread":0.16033559836979508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4466147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00387841,0.015701544,0.1689102,0.068956085,0.0013966957,0.000067771995,0.00017438112,0.00036312133,0.7405518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42431533,0.014212896,0.15090904,0.011496796,0.003220863,0.0006915447,0.0005720861,0.0012004233,0.39338103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934111,0.00499117,0.00016007805,0.0003672068,0.00090649235,0.0001638495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99299365,0.005166907,0.00019732163,0.0006519567,0.00070618925,0.0002839075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070846085,0.00080592197,0.0010068138,0.003535532,0.0055213,0.019310027,0.002161822,0.0063986834,0.017007153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0098412605,0.000690376,0.00088456797,0.0028252217,0.019843604,0.019389698,0.0044222497,0.009669212,0.005079232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021565409,0.000007751026,0.0000125394245,0.000018227414,0.0000014370619,0.000007813965,0.00047917396,0.000075317745,0.000013962962,0.99033827,0.0051417914,0.0039015014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004230329,0.0000017625557,0.000018806728,0.0000818649,0.0000017331574,0.000017414608,0.00035323823,0.00038389384,0.000039941664,0.934514,0.064580165,0.000002952418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018117557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002731007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019310027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00612997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064614387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05689454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W621402145","doi":"10.51644/dqpq7790","title":"Asking the Questions and the Importance of Saying No","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Consensus","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0442229947907461,"score_gpt":0.2602072199384394,"score_spread":0.21598422514769333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W621402145","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06619598,0.017528031,0.076522924,0.61656684,0.0038140866,0.00013142075,0.00014310253,0.00008146034,0.21901621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599538,0.0028445835,0.013286778,0.017368702,0.001666664,0.00021404176,0.00006114197,0.000096467535,0.0045078364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89052117,0.09125673,0.002887613,0.005309203,0.007817887,0.0022073558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72823787,0.23292866,0.009243995,0.010086913,0.015323239,0.004179302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08699024,0.00062291767,0.0015319765,0.0031936744,0.011991912,0.015467597,0.0033441465,0.0160347,0.006776664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1957623,0.0008594929,0.00086991553,0.002256478,0.106283076,0.03373908,0.008663207,0.015353521,0.0009766268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004735191,0.00002649507,0.0005548079,0.00015321301,0.000026680398,0.000073732095,0.016612252,0.00023615046,0.00009592654,0.97012615,0.0036791766,0.008368027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014320694,0.0000054424736,0.000135695,0.00011709113,0.000006077311,0.000028166505,0.005997876,0.00021453353,0.00006419492,0.9871476,0.0062562753,0.000012750725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033637516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023382585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08699024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005923032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010913007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46005386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W623521812","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0074-1","title":"Dynamic Formal Epistemology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Collation; Epistemology; Key (lock); Social epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06282954175862769,"score_gpt":0.25395924484122695,"score_spread":0.19112970308259924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W623521812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058141565,0.006297154,0.17764594,0.020237753,0.00089170976,0.00008100331,0.000295137,0.0002186053,0.78851855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72364134,0.005642618,0.06070939,0.004358658,0.0014660277,0.00053410727,0.0007245829,0.0005598944,0.20236333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966949,0.0016193397,0.0001162129,0.0005944834,0.000748694,0.00022640802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645567,0.0019289134,0.00014327695,0.0008727748,0.00046142735,0.00013790603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003217053,0.00071117136,0.00087736547,0.0019850347,0.003761438,0.0111710075,0.0019459567,0.0028435518,0.018921187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071814223,0.00064262585,0.00080491044,0.0017301752,0.023579322,0.015503524,0.004017959,0.0055825454,0.002998745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010201046,0.0000019009395,0.000009243423,0.000005889081,8.2867257e-7,0.0000039089914,0.00013809401,0.00005400191,0.0000103031425,0.99789584,0.0009337473,0.0009451824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021592036,0.0000011872296,0.000012226797,0.000018563429,0.0000010070623,0.00001139127,0.000120666904,0.00025981857,0.0000313795,0.9762265,0.023313422,0.0000017657746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030613872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028148056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018921187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007444239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00422897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06329769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64399390","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/37uw9","title":"Winners and Losers in the Folk Epistemology of Lotteries","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Lottery; Odds; Contrast (vision); Epistemology; Statistical evidence; Ticket; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics; Advertising; Econometrics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Null hypothesis; Statistics; Logistic regression; Mathematics; Business","score_opus":0.08751766594496235,"score_gpt":0.25711767363959837,"score_spread":0.169600007694636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64399390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9480518,0.00030008063,0.01572343,0.0026355435,0.00008217451,0.00016804575,0.000051996823,0.000042289204,0.032944657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964605,0.000060781887,0.0025898595,0.000283204,0.000018318018,0.00010141446,0.000021434445,0.000013642519,0.00045088804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9685231,0.021600274,0.001638623,0.0033022459,0.003671549,0.0012641748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7786127,0.19371933,0.012231949,0.010712439,0.0024575728,0.0022660398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034729112,0.00054516,0.0011814119,0.0009887231,0.0023489024,0.00491958,0.0016069562,0.003316457,0.00862097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14644052,0.00075733336,0.0005428769,0.0005319714,0.013115808,0.009027682,0.003995799,0.0039081057,0.00050170004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009190879,0.0047818967,0.0725992,0.0024784766,0.00076533185,0.0007751901,0.11033955,0.009923985,0.0199257,0.673286,0.0028816105,0.09305219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002101412,0.0039301016,0.06438829,0.0006456935,0.00048325403,0.0007236223,0.048900135,0.039114464,0.012206266,0.8090055,0.01804917,0.0004521255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079199707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062554877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034729112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014687993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090271584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1836673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W658619875","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511806544","title":"Fallacies and Argument Appraisal","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Dialectic; Epistemology; Identification (biology); Critical appraisal; Order (exchange); Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.04932347582373089,"score_gpt":0.23728999339342327,"score_spread":0.18796651756969238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W658619875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01717287,0.063975945,0.19000928,0.16385034,0.01450151,0.0012985377,0.00019085169,0.00044375527,0.54855686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66364795,0.032403693,0.18294488,0.019276498,0.0065103895,0.002233192,0.00040688924,0.0006404649,0.091936044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9285039,0.047773235,0.0037387665,0.0029841622,0.014795891,0.0022040838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9223148,0.06220912,0.003288925,0.0023876252,0.008633925,0.0011656004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034877084,0.001351776,0.001593293,0.00882455,0.0071782474,0.020894133,0.00259059,0.007331449,0.008627151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10934744,0.0007012676,0.00080521265,0.004461665,0.044972792,0.026063329,0.009569907,0.011614854,0.0019767794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001259684,0.000010654544,0.00010671145,0.00020263858,0.0000066796565,0.00011897531,0.009595892,0.00015110738,0.00008160927,0.9553612,0.0126739675,0.02167782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006205646,0.000011601914,0.0001213143,0.00090466725,0.0000040725886,0.00012130228,0.0073578497,0.00043845354,0.00014581282,0.86228275,0.12858821,0.000017717854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011726349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013755228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034877084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010515925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006692214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18444979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6906479353","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/chkr7","title":"Bias Justification Project","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open Science Framework","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Set (abstract data type); Focus (optics); Perspective (graphical); Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.3093541618077442,"score_gpt":0.41854694236490514,"score_spread":0.10919278055716092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6906479353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006057536,0.0025848257,0.18787251,0.07403249,0.0049958304,0.002082429,0.0031071836,0.0009425258,0.7183247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25629842,0.0022668745,0.2327918,0.032813795,0.003114114,0.006242928,0.0046150903,0.0025791195,0.4592778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92866594,0.035043754,0.0027059524,0.0058902777,0.02556408,0.0021300532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8418312,0.07724702,0.0034542386,0.022377452,0.051539104,0.0035509823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07052494,0.0007999368,0.0012112481,0.0052076755,0.0066772257,0.014069904,0.0037297227,0.0067610038,0.08834876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18426716,0.00061062345,0.0010297181,0.0034883174,0.0073487237,0.008310896,0.009033631,0.0076188906,0.019357668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058278216,0.000044031374,0.000438781,0.0002271194,0.00002416628,0.000035065557,0.0009800191,0.00018883076,0.00015978154,0.86578953,0.0672685,0.064785816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000674471,0.000018591038,0.00034103016,0.0007895934,0.000037846046,0.000070338916,0.0008500753,0.0011078389,0.0010183301,0.43139952,0.5642769,0.000022445849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006060764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0079333875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08834876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008108409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028520368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.372976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017828681","doi":"","title":"Coherence and Incoherence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Bielefeld; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; Linköpings Universitet; Stockholms Universitet; York University; Uppsala Universitet; Vetenskapsrådet; Universität zu Köln; New York University Abu Dhabi; University of Missouri","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Coherence theory; Phase difference; Spatial coherence; Significant difference","score_opus":0.036453717356320095,"score_gpt":0.2738567058224379,"score_spread":0.2374029884661178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017828681","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15416315,0.011031893,0.552642,0.034923,0.0007785981,0.00016292366,0.0002565026,0.00023467957,0.24580729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96882844,0.0011760005,0.022810493,0.0014843796,0.00033542086,0.00017931034,0.00009970402,0.00006389643,0.005022329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796592,0.008633555,0.0015925012,0.0039565917,0.004990741,0.0011674622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96590304,0.0195315,0.003413635,0.006531601,0.0037679775,0.0008521567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014189065,0.0005469345,0.0010276287,0.002735836,0.0041068606,0.0065348702,0.0014248997,0.0029327353,0.0039299866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03241736,0.00057802344,0.0008375627,0.0024631417,0.036687616,0.015595466,0.008458626,0.00473607,0.0004167189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010174033,0.000006065502,0.0002937536,0.000034869154,0.000013728522,0.000019447034,0.0012353786,0.00024372616,0.0000869107,0.9944332,0.00021794428,0.0034049104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006593782,0.000011159787,0.0002201562,0.000025068894,0.0000064058013,0.000024090043,0.00027850346,0.00039223515,0.000094922805,0.9950009,0.003933914,0.000006022924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022170078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016063482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014189065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036102952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002800257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07503986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017881168","doi":"","title":"Brandomâs Account of Defeasible Reasoning: Problems and Solutions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Defeasible estate; Entitlement (fair division); Inference; Defeasible reasoning; Relation (database); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.017299345663754934,"score_gpt":0.17494052190589177,"score_spread":0.15764117624213683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017881168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03199928,0.018972497,0.29230615,0.29170033,0.0021398757,0.00012463592,0.000615658,0.000707745,0.36143383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79829603,0.008936599,0.113497995,0.01652518,0.004920518,0.00043088352,0.00050700235,0.00045240734,0.056433324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961844,0.001641327,0.00018447751,0.0006490689,0.0009988198,0.0003419557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994612,0.0037098664,0.00028411945,0.00071655086,0.00046522694,0.0002122822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052927467,0.0010746052,0.0013064855,0.002751262,0.0032449933,0.006999764,0.0032531794,0.0066913776,0.010067451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010638198,0.0010964323,0.0017481587,0.0035892583,0.014503122,0.019673673,0.005589379,0.009662018,0.0013144686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007847621,0.0000076161778,0.000039460338,0.000013455864,0.0000036699491,0.000031906227,0.00017826185,0.00047231105,0.000012804227,0.99420375,0.0024277286,0.0026013143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049002438,0.0000010533468,0.000014374145,0.000008340438,0.0000014217599,0.000014198297,0.00003600409,0.001302031,0.00001714377,0.9952206,0.0033764255,0.0000034891252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005704823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038711245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010067451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007128458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029823382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051720858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019484727","doi":"","title":"House Speaker Says President's Tweet About Mika Brzezinski Not Appropriate : CSPAN : June 29, 2017 7:39pm-8:03pm EDT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Internet Archive (Internet Archive)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Homeland security; Homeland; Immigration detention; House of Representatives","score_opus":0.044239314518637,"score_gpt":0.2677351953838917,"score_spread":0.22349588086525468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019484727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011661801,0.0020693007,0.00042738713,0.047934677,0.032521103,0.00016998341,0.005209624,0.0010718526,0.90942985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022502604,0.0005732782,0.00008242827,0.0029753877,0.0012992612,0.00004734757,0.0008442876,0.00034387948,0.9915837],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996768,0.000036333244,0.000010854342,0.00004099066,0.00014719751,0.00008788039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990527,0.00009424155,0.00003730976,0.0000410873,0.00035674009,0.00041797705],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007283849,0.0006196355,0.00042976384,0.000649971,0.0035457604,0.0042149336,0.000501185,0.0019559807,0.5174143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021258106,0.00024549352,0.00027409405,0.000734751,0.00057115103,0.0018391676,0.0018922321,0.0035733872,0.34469062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007425814,0.000004074031,0.000034427147,0.000010640558,3.58974e-7,0.000016829525,0.000023701925,0.0000038034416,0.000023413817,0.0003361353,0.9971199,0.0024193528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030827605,0.000004103452,0.00028897615,0.000030125679,5.496608e-7,0.00000988854,0.00014518348,0.000013755576,0.00004866888,0.00011383394,0.99933916,0.0000026070295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009989718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042439364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5174143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016573092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017509975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68834996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027331226","doi":"","title":"Comments on Derek Allenâs âEthical argumentation, objectivity, and biasâ","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Subject (documents); Context (archaeology); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.06976383971585301,"score_gpt":0.25162284222959974,"score_spread":0.18185900251374673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027331226","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028244546,0.00091379456,0.0001596482,0.9807786,0.015862864,0.000010246851,0.00004369482,0.000015900872,0.0019328112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008950409,0.0010782847,0.0004408124,0.95427305,0.021356147,0.00008427068,0.00003078018,0.000092245005,0.01369387],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785648,0.007996697,0.0021251894,0.0032228488,0.006025957,0.002064404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8460231,0.103721544,0.0051304977,0.003888064,0.03722642,0.0040103965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027572995,0.0011855209,0.002002746,0.002054199,0.012427173,0.010415266,0.0053087897,0.047060892,0.0127515495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1733867,0.0012424706,0.0014864829,0.0027382062,0.013553457,0.013486662,0.0069069252,0.06823234,0.007082281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037166737,0.000010818315,0.00012406071,0.00007245373,0.0000095816995,0.0001774833,0.0030639255,0.0000447659,0.00008973057,0.019199803,0.97541445,0.0017556804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031144562,0.000010382832,0.00053279224,0.0004760669,0.00002252017,0.00014528478,0.0046305223,0.00019843651,0.00031667,0.012063455,0.9814875,0.00008522245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038636453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04218227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047060892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01163107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010541313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14582163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7040713462","doi":"","title":"Belief in context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Northwestern University","keywords":"Assertion; Context (archaeology); Salient; Relevance (law); Semantics (computer science); Belief revision","score_opus":0.04298620803928681,"score_gpt":0.18336911460911146,"score_spread":0.14038290656982466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7040713462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012553502,0.014858881,0.2428362,0.06781413,0.0014712876,0.00013335054,0.00062094815,0.0004171628,0.65929455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8795634,0.007319593,0.04530409,0.010595366,0.0021745798,0.0003668403,0.00054221356,0.00026397983,0.05387003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942584,0.002882536,0.00029065198,0.0013180942,0.00080040557,0.0004498865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948094,0.002828781,0.00037673436,0.0010502886,0.00060955493,0.00032523548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004621812,0.0009745117,0.00088128116,0.002263107,0.0040139365,0.010120251,0.0021126955,0.0041937423,0.018308328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009203342,0.00067895226,0.0014188787,0.0019713794,0.018920178,0.02191722,0.00662219,0.006814286,0.0030328135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034862762,0.0000019182467,0.00003950293,0.000018859646,0.000003815129,0.000017550714,0.00068430376,0.000095082796,0.00002167931,0.996238,0.0011666293,0.001709158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049517753,0.0000067166216,0.000067152156,0.000056041685,0.0000069791945,0.000052128806,0.00033706852,0.00038883154,0.00006821219,0.9413293,0.057674482,0.000007988526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004419362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024471832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018308328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058876155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017027232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061247528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043832388","doi":"","title":"On Understanding âProbablyâ and Other Modal Qualifiers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Utterance; Modal; Semantics (computer science); Speech act; Meaning (existential)","score_opus":0.1285611422431374,"score_gpt":0.26606068766137725,"score_spread":0.13749954541823986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043832388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05327188,0.004780549,0.19821584,0.024847789,0.00047763222,0.0001426487,0.0001728489,0.00020915635,0.7178817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95038325,0.0022448373,0.023541352,0.0023613675,0.0005273744,0.00021789824,0.00012344323,0.00019163436,0.020408709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975122,0.0012591612,0.00012460448,0.00035067947,0.0004029992,0.0003502976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942767,0.0038899,0.0005352159,0.0004696323,0.00061401195,0.00021455267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007410632,0.00081189064,0.0006831725,0.0036698263,0.005620532,0.0074050464,0.0018383801,0.0041084853,0.0110619785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00852597,0.00057203084,0.0010207668,0.0024027717,0.030805254,0.027056372,0.0062411195,0.006276359,0.0011337218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055905443,0.000002641018,0.00006176203,0.000013130697,0.0000010292587,0.000040862018,0.00284441,0.00004294789,0.000092211056,0.9955857,0.00018182117,0.0011279488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071653817,0.000018060677,0.00031300908,0.000098555254,0.000006242865,0.0001401263,0.003781621,0.0006050902,0.00037171989,0.9673185,0.02732496,0.000015030152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036198723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003991086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0110619785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029239098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001905596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039191604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7083448813","doi":"10.7202/1120415ar","title":"Thomas W. Simpson, 'Trust: A Philosophical Study'","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.1136723382969731,"score_gpt":0.35064095020462926,"score_spread":0.23696861190765617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7083448813","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00066657027,0.65175426,0.0010550711,0.33458465,0.0069148336,0.000022689464,0.00016647633,0.000027698994,0.0048076846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04298577,0.7674778,0.002704348,0.16102512,0.015136029,0.00017529212,0.00017276895,0.00010763633,0.010215169],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902035,0.0046415315,0.0010375051,0.00061107747,0.0031741746,0.00033234447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586231,0.034339618,0.0016471,0.00065145426,0.003883421,0.00085527543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012112578,0.0008304699,0.0013179642,0.004600235,0.00290512,0.0075964523,0.0019855828,0.008707856,0.0028199968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042366784,0.0007267531,0.0007211692,0.0079842135,0.008521977,0.017434886,0.0023907265,0.0077255196,0.0011307967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086225016,0.00002785235,0.0006785616,0.0032794059,0.000109729655,0.00024225845,0.007864209,0.00019573647,0.00018738305,0.2082891,0.74565774,0.03338168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007791282,0.00003881206,0.0028359385,0.005890138,0.000081195336,0.0003881552,0.0050898627,0.00017411802,0.00042540822,0.22359386,0.7613252,0.00007951803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030725416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04351939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030725416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059549324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010581841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064058185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095708478","doi":"","title":"Categorization Criteria","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Prioritization; Process (computing); Risk assessment; Human health; Risk management","score_opus":0.06467501772958623,"score_gpt":0.2680717355651352,"score_spread":0.20339671783554897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095708478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034643177,0.004605582,0.09398359,0.014461317,0.003985214,0.041505076,0.070650265,0.0013411274,0.7348248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19140601,0.003828153,0.39058968,0.006238858,0.0010723359,0.051500484,0.14884782,0.0018771525,0.2046395],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728643,0.0051169572,0.006101699,0.0024091252,0.010919621,0.0025884237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9294774,0.008229954,0.002784702,0.004934931,0.051409557,0.0031634686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017721692,0.0013007084,0.0016061303,0.017731149,0.0059364582,0.010308305,0.0046841875,0.0032109425,0.07841124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08000167,0.00047770084,0.0019861553,0.015477425,0.0022137265,0.007317377,0.005792168,0.0019186547,0.030546043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063106103,0.00029803443,0.01401258,0.0053696823,0.00010522911,0.00073454226,0.010482617,0.0006529554,0.0032999534,0.22145903,0.43805996,0.30489445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086688924,0.00009900753,0.006174784,0.002502392,0.00006045356,0.00049188413,0.008933503,0.0010685881,0.0011529279,0.054532412,0.92481303,0.00008446237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016706504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018525757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07841124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009585299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024657004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2623117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097113805","doi":"","title":"The Role of Academic Confidence and Epistemological Beliefs on Syllogistic Reasoning Performance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Syllogism; SOCRATES; Premise; Set (abstract data type); Deductive reasoning; Defeasible reasoning; Analytic reasoning","score_opus":0.0392687097162052,"score_gpt":0.25316752131765186,"score_spread":0.21389881160144666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097113805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7201568,0.00086242397,0.027301742,0.011607265,0.00009178481,0.00009356637,0.00018117759,0.0001704088,0.2395349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979048,0.00008633163,0.0011550405,0.00015360658,0.00003044749,0.000019619498,0.00004383427,0.000032187923,0.00057415856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9686094,0.018071553,0.0014471466,0.0028749222,0.0066384515,0.002358519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62214935,0.29460412,0.035246246,0.01894285,0.019424425,0.009632921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031234644,0.0005533875,0.0006428221,0.0035966907,0.002054328,0.0144339055,0.0024445574,0.0035047207,0.013133713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26831937,0.00057003496,0.00051036687,0.002561006,0.016759265,0.018074933,0.0074998965,0.0048221187,0.0009981304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012471563,0.001301507,0.15406767,0.00035004772,0.00039871296,0.0005293952,0.057660345,0.0055313944,0.0015705484,0.7035469,0.003182407,0.07061401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031461078,0.00031629318,0.09842242,0.00035605492,0.00012947594,0.0003430231,0.018436465,0.018564206,0.0017758573,0.8549004,0.0062576807,0.0001834426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004492699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019652543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031234644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003765868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025001087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16518652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106125003","doi":"10.5840/dap2008/2009242","title":"Preface","year":2008,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Directory of American Philosophers","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; State (computer science); Rank (graph theory); Period (music)","score_opus":0.10240685289917349,"score_gpt":0.2980306949928888,"score_spread":0.1956238420937153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106125003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013767683,0.012595261,0.0048440485,0.03406671,0.13691193,0.0004599283,0.022717016,0.0015671331,0.7854611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0071488223,0.008889415,0.0032648002,0.0069004647,0.02760527,0.00034245136,0.02000409,0.0009789092,0.92486584],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989832,0.00013855954,0.00007992847,0.0001619939,0.00056374085,0.000072588344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99439985,0.0010269477,0.0002014006,0.0004616069,0.0033843974,0.00052583026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014202062,0.0008627401,0.00065882487,0.0033215187,0.0026075963,0.0040597348,0.001234826,0.0010278994,0.37870842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010836737,0.00030360985,0.00044822585,0.002857981,0.00077236304,0.0031304562,0.0016563358,0.0029869513,0.24412109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010782022,0.000007668491,0.00006197458,0.00006213549,7.8378326e-7,0.000017475466,0.00007847309,0.000022140748,0.000045328474,0.0033564833,0.9729639,0.023372794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013712419,0.0000046418036,0.00018627134,0.000073739466,6.032414e-7,0.000025279913,0.000063994936,0.0000117231675,0.000022548433,0.0010936932,0.99851376,0.0000022722734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005411205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051947646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37870842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019454577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026332138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116762133","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i4.9435","title":"Two-Tier Fallacy Theory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Uniwersytet Łódzki","keywords":"Fallacy; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Conflation; Categorization; Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.04602294356571903,"score_gpt":0.2884172560950775,"score_spread":0.24239431252935847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116762133","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013981999,0.0010030771,0.8439627,0.0066567115,0.0003030144,0.0005794645,0.00023885732,0.00061210245,0.13266206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57014805,0.0007105215,0.408025,0.0020011463,0.00030356259,0.0014714156,0.00038724937,0.00038443555,0.016568573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96479225,0.015817905,0.0028715015,0.0042005307,0.010716079,0.0016018325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97187805,0.01512968,0.001542565,0.005476472,0.005098306,0.0008749813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026212052,0.0012843166,0.001931368,0.008864876,0.0059709856,0.013985889,0.004611428,0.006348221,0.009965545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040020935,0.0011304531,0.0027978562,0.004630061,0.026492724,0.019413901,0.007699759,0.0070295036,0.0023465892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007877,0.000007825539,0.0001251611,0.00003002182,0.000005609983,0.000020239793,0.00069461204,0.00015355648,0.00006580209,0.99518,0.00037643666,0.00333285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070039696,0.000007520256,0.000086098924,0.000043930013,0.00000689683,0.000052054573,0.0002308814,0.0016729406,0.000109423214,0.9922619,0.005512802,0.000008484977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022277632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016605707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026212052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067960764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042522727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13862425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117117968","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2024.4.16686","title":"What’s in a Perspective?","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Extant taxon; Cognition; Point (geometry); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.056852493660318526,"score_gpt":0.3083139244406533,"score_spread":0.2514614307803348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117117968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022180999,0.01625087,0.018857803,0.4024873,0.010452308,0.000048747308,0.00017983149,0.00008909899,0.52945304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8888037,0.01692753,0.008230036,0.043254174,0.003755155,0.00008644997,0.00021761646,0.00018385395,0.038541533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993222,0.0042668,0.00016264147,0.00069139234,0.0009269361,0.00073016464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99518883,0.0018277623,0.00042507952,0.00048820762,0.0010068227,0.0010632427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005570937,0.00073140295,0.0006589574,0.0013465964,0.008180463,0.009936386,0.0009882776,0.0037279923,0.009459177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010021879,0.00025269168,0.0007031846,0.0015892809,0.025291333,0.0180304,0.0040992536,0.0066648354,0.0023114735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041068844,0.000033378197,0.0012978701,0.00019810254,0.000038948187,0.0007690102,0.06538052,0.000055044206,0.00042771467,0.8855168,0.026795646,0.019445866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018406015,0.00004302136,0.00072240515,0.0007607544,0.000035102195,0.00078870915,0.085355185,0.00011625486,0.00027411146,0.44354764,0.46830818,0.000030214105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067323446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007828123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009936386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004653926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004170587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033766806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118551792","doi":"10.1353/rss.2025.a979300","title":"A Neo-Russellian Defence of Knowledge as Justified True Belief","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Conjunction (astronomy); Outcome (game theory); Carry (investment); Belief revision; False accusation","score_opus":0.06560876058177574,"score_gpt":0.3245159361542743,"score_spread":0.2589071755724986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118551792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033354517,0.0034245874,0.242322,0.06476434,0.0008420387,0.000088099216,0.00017940388,0.00023837497,0.6547866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95449066,0.00073842646,0.029128423,0.0035541041,0.00045977274,0.00011277793,0.000050224487,0.000080588,0.011384896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889897,0.0059447386,0.000440916,0.00087866426,0.003089829,0.0006560519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98982036,0.0054412424,0.0007376154,0.0016459947,0.0018704289,0.00048429737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011595827,0.0004587806,0.0008873618,0.0028810182,0.0031107957,0.008790851,0.0024315615,0.0069864625,0.0031262466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012141861,0.00067329995,0.00095716206,0.0016474961,0.049427498,0.010815714,0.004873854,0.0089851655,0.00073375675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002507424,0.0000014511774,0.000009598107,0.000005117628,0.0000010263515,0.0000086461305,0.00019005948,0.00009482175,0.000011505388,0.9991392,0.0001828199,0.00035331966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048842358,0.000002566781,0.000018909,0.000020314643,0.0000015596445,0.000016804626,0.0000824939,0.0006129029,0.000045644003,0.99553937,0.0036510087,0.0000034913983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032486536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002611419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011595827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008390683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004336119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06132537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7129048751","doi":"10.1111/phis.70014","title":"Pluralist Pragmatism and Rationality","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Issues","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Rationality; Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Pluralism (philosophy); Great Rationality Debate","score_opus":0.06784665982479686,"score_gpt":0.3316994581708203,"score_spread":0.26385279834602343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7129048751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0499069,0.010492218,0.08272435,0.26266742,0.0010942363,0.00006689783,0.000083534054,0.00019984599,0.5927646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677358,0.0012351497,0.008966491,0.0061917864,0.0005027328,0.00007471872,0.000021006377,0.00006389769,0.015208482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794277,0.013533383,0.0006307418,0.0020272166,0.0034751152,0.0009058137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97921264,0.012761617,0.0017209372,0.0028429783,0.0028078756,0.00065396697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016714035,0.00053053023,0.0008356574,0.0016127634,0.0049644965,0.008818459,0.001657987,0.0043057473,0.0037432737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017954292,0.0004247951,0.00090042735,0.0011703065,0.04873715,0.008176823,0.006514471,0.007231572,0.00069133425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003899194,0.0000039513393,0.000027920752,0.000011264394,0.0000034040202,0.000015623633,0.0007287986,0.00020267123,0.00003130458,0.9975273,0.00093528786,0.0005086762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005667438,0.0000023651862,0.000027159089,0.000029829649,0.0000020023917,0.00001311164,0.00026681798,0.0004083999,0.00004964437,0.9914055,0.0077853072,0.00000419734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037093528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022600936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016714035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009768209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051721237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08839333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132925719","doi":"","title":"Inquiry and its Norms","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Curiosity; Argument (complex analysis); Doxastic logic; Skepticism; Verisimilitude; Counterintuitive; Philosophy of science","score_opus":0.15438390785815193,"score_gpt":0.39021117923294985,"score_spread":0.23582727137479792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132925719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019150632,0.008888175,0.14768356,0.06485155,0.0013289553,0.0002057599,0.00021443321,0.00030670024,0.75737023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.912895,0.0026961453,0.037550867,0.0061364076,0.0015398564,0.0007135587,0.00021715715,0.00028587133,0.037965078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9648846,0.019886011,0.0021811058,0.0050741686,0.006703974,0.0012701402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9621078,0.024029111,0.0017049765,0.005847215,0.0049358285,0.0013750986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027898856,0.00051797007,0.0009797823,0.0018316007,0.005928011,0.014244028,0.0018482176,0.0045961076,0.0060986606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03504882,0.0006394376,0.00079304713,0.0012732386,0.063011445,0.016302295,0.00746637,0.007245193,0.0010916387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025397326,0.0000023252924,0.000045792614,0.0000060392927,8.365801e-7,0.000004964353,0.000832162,0.00003797366,0.00001500704,0.9975556,0.00033543742,0.0011612324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007857789,0.000005824218,0.000077922276,0.000034770415,0.0000018324216,0.000026041196,0.00043665856,0.00028433066,0.000054309352,0.9633155,0.035748597,0.0000063395414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003987238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00199296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027898856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00616552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052989586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14754504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132952533","doi":"","title":"The Cognitive Conception of Intentional Action","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Cognition; Conflation; Eliminative materialism; Rational analysis; Causation; Identity (music); Philosophy of mind; Argument (complex analysis)","score_opus":0.10671480604127426,"score_gpt":0.4049746432772674,"score_spread":0.29825983723599314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132952533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026682105,0.008388944,0.19582759,0.03956145,0.00078753603,0.00009545362,0.00013823947,0.00023182547,0.7282869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.936201,0.0039245146,0.033971936,0.0044612535,0.00080773537,0.00026094494,0.00017128713,0.00011757133,0.02008383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547833,0.0020541227,0.0001885236,0.000894311,0.0009665373,0.00041812027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99686784,0.0016272424,0.00031792797,0.0005170002,0.00037443996,0.0002955715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00410273,0.0009607207,0.0006178237,0.0023524202,0.0034319193,0.009784773,0.0021578409,0.004758679,0.004864785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048102844,0.00043534435,0.0011548899,0.0015973868,0.052889712,0.011584688,0.0047595142,0.004850687,0.0010201908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016658746,0.0000033646043,0.000052572068,0.000015393536,0.0000023260634,0.000011590457,0.0010807014,0.00011898841,0.000027676913,0.9971539,0.0003557796,0.0011760138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004505008,0.0000067712717,0.00015383518,0.000051452364,0.0000045690176,0.00004886818,0.0008296692,0.0005705807,0.000051088533,0.9714829,0.026788417,0.000007440193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044938275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021909142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009784773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046672733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030612987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033863544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7138826711","doi":"","title":"The true, the good and the justified: Essays on epistemic normativity and value","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Wishful thinking; Teleology; Commit; Philosophy of science; Falsity; Natural (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis)","score_opus":0.01929695107059497,"score_gpt":0.2571992966110584,"score_spread":0.2379023455404634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7138826711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052001856,0.056104098,0.038097918,0.23355186,0.00410468,0.00006133483,0.000104230436,0.000044008782,0.61592996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9507218,0.008582455,0.0032391683,0.009497321,0.002652847,0.00011011044,0.000041955984,0.00010642359,0.025047882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98782015,0.008723044,0.00031185822,0.000707259,0.0019013556,0.000536493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767592,0.02016262,0.0008063428,0.0007495584,0.0012356691,0.0002867106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011036244,0.0005227308,0.0006108936,0.001412978,0.005039551,0.008652706,0.00097337307,0.0048189024,0.0027058304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01891571,0.0003736232,0.0005722531,0.0013596648,0.03767072,0.013240528,0.0031149727,0.0067387507,0.00039926067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004420696,0.0000061340525,0.00005227971,0.000024499686,0.0000018978214,0.000016901358,0.0039045056,0.00006422945,0.000020718664,0.9925632,0.0021093502,0.0012319271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009167761,0.000006978616,0.00015458636,0.00024852736,0.0000038907247,0.0000234498,0.002602283,0.00020511501,0.000056402645,0.95228475,0.044396635,0.0000081779845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024256734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024188834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011036244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070598666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032573552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05836594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139574039","doi":"","title":"Commentary on âLevels of Depth in Deep Disagreementâ","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Feature (linguistics); Margin (machine learning); Focus (optics); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.05607707101966159,"score_gpt":0.24984480043567567,"score_spread":0.19376772941601408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139574039","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035822115,0.0016681453,0.00018594114,0.9835871,0.009497181,0.0000051304946,0.000033209246,0.0000065433305,0.0046585277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035025995,0.0015696678,0.00039825466,0.9334608,0.021442536,0.00010457833,0.000036553934,0.00010689061,0.007854701],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96081513,0.020194955,0.0025125742,0.0052510775,0.0069850064,0.004241233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7807845,0.1934007,0.003876923,0.0036373963,0.013618797,0.0046817157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041959994,0.0011887436,0.003046169,0.0030838843,0.021393178,0.01414168,0.0073399837,0.06500757,0.00802694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17051284,0.0015862045,0.0017613246,0.003426312,0.054067694,0.023970377,0.01109306,0.10619674,0.002645876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007100611,0.000010774065,0.00012153466,0.00024481677,0.000034568864,0.00027220952,0.018263733,0.00007188532,0.00005946745,0.2382216,0.7387652,0.0038631924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101914884,0.000011602126,0.00046832993,0.0018976851,0.000042685027,0.00017189702,0.015354628,0.00019688667,0.000173622,0.13685146,0.84464085,0.00008850374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041413616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061176702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06500757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01868459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016651675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22190827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7159893944","doi":"","title":"What Could Go Wrong?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Counterintuitive; Nothing; Plural; Politics; Perspective (graphical); Romance; Undoing; Multitude","score_opus":0.15789751790826803,"score_gpt":0.3848963618884558,"score_spread":0.22699884398018774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7159893944","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025536092,0.008616229,0.0031067522,0.6080056,0.015696486,0.00004973255,0.00016428863,0.00008591915,0.36172137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18190257,0.012377482,0.0033979777,0.47329065,0.007979219,0.00023245534,0.00029560327,0.00029069805,0.32023337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99254566,0.0032011785,0.00020710623,0.0009714659,0.0018127005,0.0012619558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962298,0.0017406022,0.00024060167,0.0003428672,0.00076818635,0.00067793374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009383482,0.00060318055,0.000613191,0.00091306685,0.008721145,0.013063357,0.0019523713,0.009015188,0.04420409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015417471,0.00028809346,0.0005886284,0.0006979207,0.020738315,0.016633078,0.0058657364,0.013864119,0.0104551995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002008812,0.000030012901,0.0006754893,0.00010377313,0.000013205783,0.00041652718,0.008384151,0.00005893864,0.000068667396,0.6424988,0.31861746,0.029112881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006229233,0.000010966403,0.00022776604,0.00045317205,0.0000064890933,0.00026984556,0.013643597,0.000057499423,0.00007887976,0.17337736,0.8118547,0.000013664215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006462244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008966138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04420409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048317206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007398513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1478774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7160057930","doi":"10.5840/idpp2003/2004132","title":"Preface","year":2003,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Directory of Philosophy and Philosophers","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Latin Americans; Period (music); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.08154009085969305,"score_gpt":0.29949724399619815,"score_spread":0.2179571531365051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7160057930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012727208,0.007933739,0.0041563693,0.023157177,0.098616384,0.00048714472,0.0248299,0.0019377427,0.8376088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004854365,0.0046823686,0.0022022668,0.0044304957,0.014005392,0.00028026322,0.01950308,0.0008381473,0.94920355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991677,0.00010957237,0.00006486583,0.00013194735,0.00045940932,0.00006644943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946115,0.0008267559,0.00017856862,0.00042580478,0.003415143,0.00054224214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012518616,0.00077250396,0.00061870134,0.0028592518,0.002526263,0.0036253782,0.0012538921,0.0009881539,0.4916067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008722031,0.00029328978,0.00039016176,0.0025358892,0.0006198809,0.0028207037,0.0014939884,0.0024971126,0.33000615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000121394505,0.000007743581,0.00005201951,0.000053129846,6.329339e-7,0.000017761511,0.000060386516,0.000021059393,0.00004728036,0.002295886,0.97552603,0.021906037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017429337,0.000005296214,0.0001799547,0.00006401283,5.4573525e-7,0.000024834566,0.000055921806,0.000010584668,0.00002333105,0.0007979439,0.9988337,0.0000022019806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005992165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065864795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4916067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017465774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025109523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7160077894","doi":"10.5840/idpp2005/2006142","title":"Preface","year":2005,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Directory of Philosophy and Philosophers","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Latin Americans; Period (music); Information system","score_opus":0.07444456918034942,"score_gpt":0.305219929566386,"score_spread":0.23077536038603658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7160077894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013208797,0.008934711,0.0041013313,0.02702392,0.12290074,0.0005183498,0.0273583,0.0020030236,0.80583876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049743406,0.0050667864,0.0021349804,0.005077738,0.016704626,0.00028727454,0.020648647,0.00083233847,0.94427335],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912006,0.00011501094,0.00006936929,0.0001352517,0.00048915105,0.00007115128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99403363,0.0008852662,0.000196458,0.00045163048,0.0038282017,0.0006048644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013253322,0.0007624937,0.00061850355,0.002964221,0.0025139085,0.0037694818,0.0012363471,0.0010201354,0.48547044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009444436,0.00029996247,0.00039734223,0.002582622,0.0006353484,0.0029064408,0.0014972284,0.002569973,0.32081294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011304854,0.0000072822204,0.000049625793,0.000053597367,6.099084e-7,0.000016309603,0.000053381133,0.000019864341,0.00004396841,0.0021317608,0.97780025,0.019812088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017567177,0.000005364417,0.00019047089,0.00006999325,5.6068234e-7,0.000022803762,0.000053740358,0.000010321337,0.00002323925,0.00074741757,0.99887186,0.0000023505013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064381296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068133664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48547044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018424233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026362147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164567720","doi":"10.1515/9780820372273-023","title":"Depraved indifference","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Semiotics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.10785407016030275,"score_gpt":0.26249738771798686,"score_spread":0.15464331755768412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164567720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055054626,0.010047231,0.017610015,0.05095534,0.0030185375,0.00005106221,0.00011673674,0.00011137091,0.9125842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39406878,0.0057337256,0.0090495,0.041092798,0.0028125602,0.00026682395,0.00019066877,0.00050364045,0.5462815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99456996,0.0028010798,0.00012461086,0.0011633517,0.000970879,0.00037007005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608326,0.0016185233,0.00011823703,0.001043161,0.0008628593,0.00027385063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005160918,0.0007493589,0.0010386048,0.0015746865,0.006094133,0.008749801,0.0015377721,0.0040948894,0.018095836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011213673,0.00047416176,0.00057313737,0.00093669636,0.035257738,0.013801491,0.0069858567,0.01157686,0.0059429365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074970962,0.0000051719135,0.000021357017,0.000009718558,0.0000011360817,0.000008477954,0.0009909796,0.000021265436,0.000022396693,0.98969483,0.006585775,0.0026314273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009646166,0.000009192681,0.00004910037,0.000090079055,0.0000027019346,0.000044310455,0.0009104484,0.00013563047,0.00012901431,0.7332825,0.2653301,0.0000073215137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036481612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040763835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018095836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060257176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004100537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060536563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165919550","doi":"10.53437/ppa8e353","title":"Epistemic Indefinites: Are We Ignorant About Ignorance?","year":2013,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Existentialism; Doxastic logic; Identification (biology); Component (thermodynamics); Externalism","score_opus":0.08473799824798596,"score_gpt":0.26656997731541554,"score_spread":0.1818319790674296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165919550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22024778,0.026439562,0.1433009,0.27253273,0.0009823978,0.00007449938,0.0003605691,0.00021464539,0.33584696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98459285,0.0027154083,0.0037088234,0.0047494676,0.0005338355,0.000027930173,0.000051578114,0.000055562203,0.0035646441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950336,0.0025410086,0.00026196046,0.00078530225,0.0009224104,0.0004557846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785429,0.014029817,0.002290438,0.0023066856,0.0021754636,0.0006547049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011496737,0.0004209364,0.000822839,0.0014338538,0.0037243934,0.008365824,0.0016873459,0.00459295,0.0031835095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026295012,0.00046490674,0.000578132,0.0011908187,0.034405295,0.031037843,0.004332983,0.006408,0.00045635548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003910337,0.000012635097,0.00097637874,0.000088194116,0.000018952285,0.00025738933,0.0179019,0.00017746787,0.00021392628,0.9703946,0.0013359075,0.008583627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007710465,0.00000821275,0.00055211835,0.0001109721,0.000012516358,0.00015905891,0.0038269588,0.0003608359,0.00014448419,0.9773038,0.0174959,0.000017451595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004528309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024349864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011496737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033235366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016801539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060801268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W768171620","doi":"10.5007/%x","title":"Anonymity and testimonial warrant","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Worry; Warrant; Reductionism; Anonymity; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Computer security; Business","score_opus":0.038871976899541826,"score_gpt":0.25168924097819023,"score_spread":0.2128172640786484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W768171620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037391935,0.010897949,0.084346086,0.10266093,0.0018289242,0.00016319774,0.0006192631,0.00020588105,0.7618858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91345876,0.003725987,0.010375817,0.007129508,0.001338115,0.00017895637,0.00023352288,0.00008342317,0.06347599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97628003,0.015190853,0.0014745105,0.0021037117,0.0036020516,0.0013488288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92544955,0.053523116,0.0046567637,0.008810041,0.005982574,0.0015778535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014930224,0.00065292325,0.0008846392,0.0019223235,0.0073600956,0.008398458,0.001920683,0.0075247553,0.016650222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060915004,0.0006027932,0.000793689,0.001950293,0.014817818,0.012252616,0.009323903,0.005761951,0.0026769037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003034911,0.0000063833363,0.00018859608,0.000097858785,0.000009497394,0.00023684594,0.0019774192,0.00024289073,0.00010276787,0.9848177,0.004961326,0.007328537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019582778,0.000018364062,0.00023533724,0.00020291246,0.000018195471,0.00034886858,0.0012249647,0.0008275051,0.0003547855,0.927017,0.06970271,0.00002983287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003007897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027224335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016650222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005371371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045880694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078959465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W808749601","doi":"","title":"Anticipating Objections as a Way of Coping With Dissensus","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Epistemology; Argumentation theory; Task (project management); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.04901128884923234,"score_gpt":0.25887892102703675,"score_spread":0.2098676321778044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W808749601","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10845075,0.00087434147,0.6926913,0.101331465,0.0013912278,0.0008556968,0.000056635097,0.0013284434,0.09302011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8391552,0.00046866524,0.14706011,0.005334589,0.00068812777,0.0007177533,0.00006900331,0.0003175474,0.0061889933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.86392987,0.08898592,0.007562639,0.009356242,0.024959235,0.0052059987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72666645,0.20237994,0.029572912,0.020686332,0.015328609,0.005365644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12095767,0.0014681764,0.0014088725,0.0032930877,0.008046456,0.016284235,0.0065715206,0.017784845,0.006240118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23423444,0.001427205,0.0019759575,0.0015490288,0.02818787,0.033152185,0.019352024,0.019123893,0.001116705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001909259,0.00018399343,0.004511254,0.00043544243,0.0001361708,0.0024063648,0.1188971,0.00545264,0.004033465,0.8014152,0.0058383057,0.05649911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007763247,0.0001396276,0.0012378705,0.00040627594,0.000054917047,0.0005037062,0.024825137,0.011233607,0.0025770767,0.9208708,0.03788807,0.00018538094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010507941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011577957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12095767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050011594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010789055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63969296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W816523984","doi":"","title":"Virtuous agency as the ground for argument norms","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Agency (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Virtuous circle and vicious circle; Practical reason; Philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.04868161694541547,"score_gpt":0.23518089674726092,"score_spread":0.18649927980184544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W816523984","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032412067,0.0041963966,0.516019,0.10051978,0.0012127624,0.00012800952,0.00013598814,0.00040071097,0.34497526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.916525,0.0007720324,0.069968164,0.0031543935,0.0005644855,0.0002650697,0.000054585267,0.00015828307,0.008537873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9738695,0.017382983,0.0015052803,0.00240908,0.0038119638,0.0010211782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9557724,0.029897828,0.002866551,0.006119471,0.0038974576,0.0014463613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029616682,0.0006593167,0.0009430396,0.0030869846,0.004808607,0.013236984,0.0025365779,0.0066784522,0.0033308975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038087748,0.00073826284,0.0011540893,0.0012100559,0.061856322,0.017950559,0.0061148936,0.0077611827,0.0008551771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030315614,0.0000021426195,0.000026748654,0.000006868103,0.0000017889728,0.000008311285,0.0004722368,0.000085874424,0.000019715884,0.99849975,0.0002673867,0.00060606346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054841526,0.0000027531828,0.000014504318,0.000021517468,0.0000014440325,0.000008922753,0.00013572743,0.00030815252,0.00008411681,0.9946372,0.0047758445,0.0000043056607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016017678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015108745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029616682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004982492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045197904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15662986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W829009663","doi":"","title":"Revision and Immortality in Philosophical Argumentation: Reconsidering the Rhetorical Wedge","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Immortality; Argument map; Linguistics; Theology","score_opus":0.2514490582201403,"score_gpt":0.3188525034603191,"score_spread":0.06740344524017883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W829009663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12523901,0.013003197,0.3107003,0.073894024,0.0016840349,0.000108778775,0.00006484225,0.00023320947,0.47507256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833167,0.0011016745,0.009052766,0.00131415,0.0004209569,0.000077157776,0.000018099925,0.00008140677,0.004617024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96777433,0.025138818,0.0010354662,0.0011954793,0.0034443496,0.0014116156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94187224,0.046376754,0.0022944333,0.0047294586,0.0035680886,0.0011590053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029413663,0.000575289,0.0011470628,0.00465797,0.007586139,0.015322145,0.0020066728,0.006088082,0.0030092432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05129781,0.000628633,0.000985817,0.0023924308,0.06315618,0.033730254,0.013538643,0.0072312197,0.0005583849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009188764,0.000004212286,0.00009209156,0.000029267518,0.0000030252759,0.00005867378,0.008164828,0.00012580345,0.00006556942,0.98867524,0.00021155855,0.0025605108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010919236,0.000011814573,0.000072865296,0.00008825408,0.000006040765,0.00008026426,0.0030348776,0.00048277245,0.00013871968,0.9834805,0.012583082,0.000009760236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011164773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008986789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029413663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004395547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003991863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15555614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W8712222","doi":"10.1016/s0272-6386(96)90130-4","title":"COMMON GROUND AND MODAL DISAGREEMENT","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Common ground; Modal; Common cause and special cause; Linguistics; Epistemology; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Statistics","score_opus":0.10461236430995692,"score_gpt":0.3057051897609112,"score_spread":0.2010928254509543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W8712222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19092618,0.012643663,0.08199241,0.15606841,0.005881367,0.00056438637,0.0017212,0.0006235777,0.54957885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95947397,0.0017256024,0.007122599,0.014115806,0.0017331468,0.00033729762,0.00073156937,0.00022293736,0.014537129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96330726,0.017819433,0.003084316,0.004816053,0.0072865565,0.0036863945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9303073,0.040516872,0.0054875407,0.009821337,0.010258775,0.003608204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03382371,0.00041531023,0.00092635397,0.0056907935,0.0075107524,0.008517032,0.0025619124,0.0036246309,0.02447942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.129749,0.00041299057,0.0007181865,0.00534074,0.013973013,0.010733987,0.012276165,0.0046828715,0.0018882324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002210259,0.00005011918,0.024956785,0.00057380024,0.00007766045,0.00097201235,0.08511984,0.00029238246,0.0004262869,0.7228025,0.047117334,0.117390245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005260515,0.000031278945,0.00951868,0.0010525808,0.00004967369,0.0011665127,0.052409142,0.0014470759,0.0003730801,0.6172295,0.3166152,0.000054688502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037840984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031514661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03382371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004685526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046889475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17887902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W88368385","doi":"","title":"Lies and Misdemeanours","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Essays on Canadian writing","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.07567826423696451,"score_gpt":0.2276232283313177,"score_spread":0.1519449640943532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W88368385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027770927,0.019599413,0.001820808,0.29876518,0.0029087025,0.00002786972,0.00011117916,0.000045542496,0.64895034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8800985,0.0057168063,0.00079319294,0.016195437,0.001002078,0.00002560397,0.000036549107,0.00009509273,0.096036695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98593116,0.004526068,0.0003754739,0.0010647161,0.0053637205,0.0027387862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756285,0.011449922,0.0010580174,0.0012701937,0.008581809,0.0020115746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010640261,0.0008065274,0.0008001133,0.0047082067,0.04179551,0.020593027,0.0024750577,0.0097528305,0.008979299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033039544,0.00045233523,0.00035319658,0.0052733165,0.094166696,0.010309045,0.0054262155,0.011191015,0.0008133802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012311389,0.000007295126,0.00017733431,0.000032575008,0.0000056683903,0.000098445715,0.061882865,0.00006718614,0.000039303337,0.9039835,0.02951627,0.0041771294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018792414,0.000008193231,0.0010895233,0.00051540957,0.000020123973,0.00012838842,0.11995278,0.00017532658,0.00025501344,0.31251487,0.5652711,0.00005058819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7498219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81817216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2501781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07220312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081947386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52387273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W88740960","doi":"","title":"Higher Level Moral Principles in Argumentation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Reflective equilibrium; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Ideal (ethics); Function (biology); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16612955522986197,"score_gpt":0.267662331379803,"score_spread":0.10153277614994102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W88740960","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034457345,0.005477559,0.572726,0.0641651,0.0014275908,0.0003721863,0.00020250014,0.0003395799,0.32083213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79368895,0.001226359,0.18564092,0.004137482,0.00095405657,0.000560558,0.00017123023,0.00016462138,0.013455739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91898227,0.055457313,0.0040484625,0.0057335496,0.011693546,0.0040848786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9496343,0.034253456,0.003119989,0.005489335,0.0057716668,0.0017313513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052270588,0.0013028372,0.0020849153,0.0047704773,0.009374342,0.023159144,0.0041986518,0.016177444,0.00752022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048284065,0.0013693586,0.0029401486,0.0030671137,0.05236893,0.024853617,0.011171467,0.014485769,0.0017702727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048718703,0.000006686676,0.000056167184,0.000026774394,0.000009497485,0.000028255728,0.0010393417,0.00042655072,0.000033829612,0.9965767,0.00045406236,0.0013372205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010650504,0.0000030402025,0.000034578065,0.000031108553,0.000002938471,0.000017726674,0.00016886598,0.00083344895,0.000032740445,0.9942888,0.004569207,0.0000067325614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032461022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021572402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052270588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010255027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064121583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27643663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89770856","doi":"","title":"Resolving Deep Disagreement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argumentation theory; Statement (logic); Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05055932912690555,"score_gpt":0.24168903376236137,"score_spread":0.1911297046354558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W89770856","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049128465,0.0066599683,0.47666723,0.27911478,0.008573502,0.00027219715,0.00020016273,0.00050799805,0.17887565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8529555,0.0020298532,0.08921003,0.024988538,0.002955683,0.00033736535,0.0002035868,0.0003954396,0.026924051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91209024,0.057623014,0.003932153,0.008227146,0.013556576,0.004570868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86491007,0.09601373,0.008338869,0.016021388,0.011089789,0.0036261536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.069827445,0.0011359438,0.0017483291,0.003054189,0.0135165695,0.015664186,0.0034644045,0.014685435,0.008593526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15007645,0.0010751571,0.0017998145,0.0022213727,0.028308677,0.030755788,0.027535655,0.019779684,0.0020313156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006242495,0.000026790578,0.0004661783,0.00015700802,0.000058718142,0.00030435438,0.019823639,0.0005261007,0.0005387091,0.947153,0.010202307,0.020680835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002072362,0.000012679251,0.000078649784,0.00014592748,0.000020819021,0.00009815943,0.0047063427,0.0010397214,0.0005052629,0.9420315,0.051315043,0.000025196568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013981821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014063437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069827445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005528992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068791504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36928725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W921136551","doi":"","title":"Commentary on: Suzanne McMurphy's \"Trust, distrust, and trustworthiness in argumentation: Virtues and fallacies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argumentation theory; Objectivity (philosophy); Distrust; Context (archaeology); Rationality; Sociology; Interpersonal communication; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.025931796916785096,"score_gpt":0.21916474619546883,"score_spread":0.19323294927868373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W921136551","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009492065,0.0014040322,0.00006257958,0.9779816,0.019692402,0.0000035771877,0.000030638552,0.000010898102,0.00071932527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055806004,0.0016241922,0.00014145787,0.9542355,0.031936992,0.000039874536,0.000025490855,0.00005066697,0.006365207],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936545,0.0028868797,0.00033666304,0.0009985776,0.0016422793,0.00048119386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798148,0.0135887535,0.00095416943,0.00047710634,0.0038419364,0.0013233479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057465755,0.0013038707,0.0017110736,0.0015427293,0.008441818,0.007383191,0.006685833,0.042967502,0.010802815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041698396,0.00079739874,0.0016703908,0.0017361317,0.010814703,0.009907357,0.0043875803,0.05481302,0.006325771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011603722,0.0000018109828,0.000026270822,0.000038222108,0.0000034330876,0.0000734998,0.00045270668,0.000013522815,0.000013081574,0.0021979597,0.99624085,0.00092705654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002797394,0.000013752505,0.00036848336,0.0007971494,0.000018170522,0.00042442905,0.0030983945,0.00016419498,0.0001507304,0.01368193,0.9811958,0.000059101054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03982582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046053115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042967502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0081937285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008218461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07918805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W92744926","doi":"10.2307/jj.21995739.19","title":"Relativism, Coherence, and the Problems of Philosophy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Notre Dame Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Art history; SAINT; State (computer science); KISS (TNC); Pessimism; Performance art; Psychoanalysis; Classics; Epistemology; Art; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07359699502013638,"score_gpt":0.19774581906282962,"score_spread":0.12414882404269324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W92744926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070277475,0.1011295,0.08081684,0.33975044,0.0027781993,0.00008619322,0.0002862893,0.00028167816,0.4045934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492436,0.011778972,0.0131215155,0.0067515243,0.0032329988,0.00011675905,0.00013353238,0.00013200234,0.015489104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98682517,0.009896378,0.00036654348,0.0011096722,0.0012331989,0.00056905986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988574,0.008273671,0.0008546802,0.0012379502,0.0006040343,0.0004556219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0117676025,0.0006259919,0.000941852,0.0020893796,0.006218336,0.008954946,0.0012074871,0.004098224,0.0046284324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012363856,0.0005837554,0.0007649543,0.0027069475,0.040939353,0.018409228,0.0054872916,0.008549526,0.00060391944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004695437,0.0000029231026,0.000047317608,0.000018701068,0.0000029875914,0.000008212505,0.00060215994,0.000108373075,0.0000123509535,0.9967834,0.0011046154,0.0013043436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003192107,0.0000019654453,0.00004363936,0.000009413574,9.330278e-7,0.0000066343587,0.00015937196,0.00008747608,0.000005636723,0.99480057,0.004879199,0.0000018761995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042285267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025482955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0117676025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008675802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003069284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06294763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W998192189","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139035217.009","title":"New Kinds of Subjective Uncertainty?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04828418737801474,"score_gpt":0.20967694683130705,"score_spread":0.16139275945329232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W998192189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015008886,0.03803539,0.10895978,0.08286738,0.0023019533,0.000049258615,0.00043405435,0.00011489532,0.7522284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8890103,0.022273542,0.019686695,0.009118608,0.003819467,0.00024602743,0.00028507368,0.00023840157,0.05532182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99512404,0.0026244326,0.00018675183,0.0005086358,0.0012503333,0.00030587145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99164444,0.006014698,0.00033969985,0.0009947876,0.0007258564,0.00028050257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075581637,0.0007706901,0.00077672437,0.0016825172,0.0023594585,0.009890314,0.0012410855,0.0025496471,0.009703741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015639992,0.00048733354,0.0008856171,0.0017278164,0.023942314,0.0192809,0.0039652125,0.0059153293,0.001214206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040228783,0.0000017514603,0.000036116282,0.000023957817,0.0000028940854,0.00001361622,0.0005583121,0.00008878112,0.0000127819385,0.9943082,0.0017760161,0.0031734821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001348323,0.0000016138252,0.000057396817,0.000049565202,0.0000017593802,0.00002202967,0.0002875605,0.00018198136,0.000019215482,0.9877545,0.011618507,0.0000044226426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014891217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016394866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009890314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035733639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018813395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039971888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}