{"meta":{"query_hash":"d3232f0dd9bd","filters":{"topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics"},"cohort_total":807,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":807,"exported":807,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d3232f0dd9bd","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Epistemology%2C+Ethics%2C+and+Metaphysics"},"results":[{"id":"W10905981","doi":"10.1016/b0-08-044854-2/01122-6","title":"Epistemology and Language","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Skepticism; Epistemology; Relation (database); Semantics (computer science); Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.03029471805517239,"score_gpt":0.2450336050754534,"score_spread":0.21473888702028102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W10905981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015479482,0.005042409,9.4829016e-7,0.00017499374,0.0010314608,0.0002799926,0.00011406077,0.00009919718,0.99310213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021120524,0.00006958314,0.000044201108,0.0009547365,0.0021594246,0.000015383563,0.000078331446,0.00009189923,0.9944744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986725,0.000048351914,0.00039835123,0.00042467122,0.00016600401,0.00029013192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990165,0.00013854782,0.00025032923,0.00041554024,0.00009967436,0.00007935954],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023846484,0.000400525,0.0006506305,0.000119920114,0.00024252714,0.000085640735,0.00017643094,0.0003778433,0.0006185983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010463708,0.00036103386,0.00020049814,0.0000016960316,0.0013116606,0.000035288253,0.00009788291,0.00064928085,0.00025972692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005343164,0.0000058100177,0.0000018859457,0.00018065576,0.0000864143,0.00007093759,0.0065778643,3.4790165e-8,0.0000048065626,0.6505676,0.0021271317,0.34037155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016960218,0.0000601845,0.0000034121208,0.000121488985,0.00014378963,0.000022588714,0.00014237915,5.4855064e-7,0.00000593981,0.081653126,0.91731757,0.00035939016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020036094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012675959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9151904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029771682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005717592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W119078039","doi":"10.1023/a:1016307111148","title":"Externalism, Memory, and Self-Knowledge","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Externalism; Epistemology; Doctrine; Philosophy; Ontology; Subject (documents); Individuation; Inclusion (mineral); Value (mathematics); A priori and a posteriori; Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Theology; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06696832159040311,"score_gpt":0.25196915492412764,"score_spread":0.18500083333372452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W119078039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15928176,0.0063287155,0.000027935006,0.001305309,0.0019263019,0.00015394557,0.000022282784,0.00026711507,0.8306866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8783629,0.00046425944,0.00016074731,0.00076895376,0.0016947261,0.000012837024,0.0000032940236,0.00002742905,0.11850485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992314,0.00007369399,0.00016598597,0.00021250585,0.00009584159,0.00022056604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999466,0.000108670014,0.000056806533,0.0002122286,0.000072386545,0.000083883635],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018496648,0.00013914217,0.00018738507,0.000051580853,0.000297285,0.000115040886,0.0001251208,0.00006201401,0.0022061646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019762201,0.00012200437,0.00006934872,0.00001906491,0.00031983387,0.00014812013,0.000049311922,0.00019022463,0.00062680466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006661003,0.00048895116,0.00035327353,0.00018772471,0.00015226688,0.000032877764,0.31064335,3.985636e-7,0.00009443935,0.56789285,0.102538295,0.017608928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030709396,0.00006689534,0.0002232092,0.000019389103,0.00004749237,0.000010578668,0.0012339615,0.00022550591,0.000099404606,0.0067356527,0.99083215,0.0001986942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000115336145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038388718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8882938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013304462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007839818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W119769438","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6209-284-6_9","title":"Understanding Denial and Delusion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SensePublishers eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Denial; Relation (database); Scope (computer science); Philosophical theory; Philosophical methodology; Work (physics); Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.2115899258376878,"score_gpt":0.23886932054126522,"score_spread":0.02727939470357743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W119769438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021450459,0.0002546283,0.000056075405,0.0004113592,0.0023928285,0.00034557842,0.000035550394,0.00015838824,0.99613106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014696378,0.000030338279,0.000082528786,0.0009850094,0.0020169537,0.0000059984586,0.000050652172,0.00011802059,0.9820141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839425,0.000041835825,0.00038156082,0.00049251935,0.00033115176,0.00035868728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988048,0.00018077783,0.00027164692,0.0003590969,0.00021104692,0.00017260724],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027543757,0.00044468683,0.00051367,0.00022494736,0.0005829315,0.00096950226,0.0001740171,0.00051754125,0.0018859266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027378033,0.00040654934,0.00019540031,0.0000033167107,0.001427758,0.00027738337,0.00015201027,0.0008601954,0.00017607612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011192991,0.000003553393,6.5741125e-7,0.0000791589,0.00011417781,0.000020669777,0.0105762705,9.262558e-8,0.000008828254,0.9018205,0.08549066,0.0018742869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000212284,0.000049266197,3.4098233e-7,0.00009767362,0.00010025023,0.000011806237,0.0012173528,0.000007879689,0.0000034860414,0.35435784,0.6435912,0.0003505765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021702064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013789084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5581006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013604207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011174282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W141175123","doi":"10.1023/a:1007837321284","title":"Slippery Slopes and Collapsing Taboos","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.033965186975042326,"score_gpt":0.25552911910522963,"score_spread":0.2215639321301873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W141175123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8390789,0.00030816827,0.000022639078,0.00072345015,0.0003984039,0.00013029005,0.000008775942,0.000048098438,0.15928125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740795,0.00015958596,0.0002153821,0.001348067,0.00034939748,0.000011103147,0.000026548303,0.000009273312,0.023801146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995797,0.000035254314,0.000109426255,0.00010843735,0.00007071968,0.00009640861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981004,0.000044502583,0.000030951058,0.00006000013,0.00002990394,0.00002463059],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000097610246,0.00006198068,0.000076438904,0.000025180501,0.00025348816,0.00009692554,0.000028112067,0.000022907072,0.0017008312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000549921,0.00005802863,0.000019607294,0.00001360326,0.00014729344,0.00023311503,0.00000532831,0.000053208103,0.00012884356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005795325,0.00011577014,0.0015254876,0.00009679245,0.00010276344,0.0000061022024,0.20408826,0.000019625279,0.0017479318,0.5418715,0.007792117,0.24257572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007156545,0.0001097281,0.0018423344,0.000035551708,0.000079264675,0.000004796421,0.0117788315,0.00010817769,0.0014189003,0.018177304,0.9654828,0.0002467069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014387167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002855661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95769066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009353519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010034194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1440985897","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511619311.001","title":"Introduction","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Balance (ability); Adversary; The Internet; Political science; Sociology; Positive economics; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Computer security; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07158971641135597,"score_gpt":0.2228153060685934,"score_spread":0.15122558965723742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1440985897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000029642211,0.00015321761,0.000118275915,0.000095364456,0.0022388056,0.0002225384,0.00017044568,0.00017169307,0.9968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00018021345,0.00007872306,0.000031656848,0.00017059573,0.005437426,2.4291163e-7,0.00010417971,0.000047083788,0.9939499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887544,0.000031508003,0.00018815557,0.00043487933,0.00021360244,0.00025638976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883765,0.00006263277,0.00022654174,0.00046127607,0.00030728255,0.00010462456],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018877343,0.00030847057,0.00036902845,0.00018929533,0.00037743468,0.00006136298,0.00028602043,0.0003444166,0.00009430014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008593608,0.00035666348,0.00024620813,0.0000019049303,0.0009953033,0.00010114503,0.00013258019,0.00074476196,0.00011193157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039867562,0.000007254851,9.1623534e-8,0.000073129835,0.00012014155,0.000065079825,0.00077881344,2.497788e-7,0.000004694144,0.8341229,0.16375217,0.0010355973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022081485,0.000049974613,7.0206187e-7,0.000043630836,0.0002452334,0.000006495232,0.00027402095,0.0000021661324,0.000066756744,0.00018051379,0.998545,0.00036468983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023797245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006555511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83479285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012833603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006501511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1458770969","doi":"10.1111/mila.12112","title":"Full‐On Stating","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind & Language","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Proposition; Sentence; Grice; Phrase; Epistemology; Function (biology); Linguistics; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Pragmatics","score_opus":0.04854387629254079,"score_gpt":0.2784761335739991,"score_spread":0.2299322572814583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1458770969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7425651,0.00016157462,0.00005234691,0.0008356823,0.0004868548,0.000058662095,0.00005998864,0.00003789301,0.2557419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464455,0.0000034127584,0.00012145605,0.0005986424,0.0009135037,0.0000057943635,0.0000066075204,0.000014586539,0.05189049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994087,0.000044312073,0.000116512434,0.00014341339,0.00010221631,0.00018481066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999549,0.00015383228,0.000051808885,0.00017501862,0.000032342803,0.00003802515],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016519027,0.000088631656,0.00011066008,0.000034216006,0.00012541606,0.00003609374,0.00008723118,0.00003457904,0.0023811262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064045074,0.000053604726,0.000053359287,0.000009820794,0.00017251038,0.00006923699,0.000017536953,0.00008923518,0.0009088025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056266417,0.000103952916,0.00010342265,0.000045727735,0.000057748166,0.00008223214,0.29622188,3.7865786e-7,0.017697651,0.46962428,0.0065864483,0.20942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010184309,0.0005408089,0.000158068,0.00018646066,0.000045854187,0.000006252946,0.047868647,0.0000054908837,0.013572543,0.008906425,0.9272008,0.00049019785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000077490826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086580816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92061436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013624568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013346592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W146218034","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195309799.013.0001","title":"Introduction: Philosophy and Cognitive Science","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Explication; Philosophy of science; Cognition; Epistemology; Philosophy of mind; Cognitive science; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.055016054628995684,"score_gpt":0.22555136654571836,"score_spread":0.17053531191672266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W146218034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009216236,0.00028897758,0.000020698195,0.00015957394,0.0012919111,0.00024248169,0.00014887584,0.00007820938,0.9976771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031841209,0.00010690017,0.000026171912,0.00012096516,0.0049428935,8.283897e-7,0.000039618957,0.00002261668,0.99155587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988344,0.000050376122,0.00011959651,0.00044013144,0.00025168038,0.00030384705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998944,0.0000877479,0.00018496624,0.0002547853,0.00038225888,0.00014624468],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002374476,0.0002505417,0.00030905657,0.0001892158,0.0008901264,0.00010896601,0.0002898245,0.0001792967,0.00010880187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017266208,0.00026872306,0.000092088005,0.000007150946,0.0051956894,0.00033675786,0.0002895486,0.0005606001,0.000004238411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037979622,0.000015546615,0.0000013481041,0.0001245524,0.000086086424,0.000008757247,0.008027495,4.1245944e-8,0.0000018680909,0.98065156,0.009158769,0.0018859718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025876286,0.00006280989,0.0000027964797,0.00008033825,0.00034801627,0.000005921817,0.00069243024,0.0000010509721,0.000024365541,0.010525842,0.98770016,0.00029750797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033546192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003955458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9785414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009327535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025413325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482119929","doi":"10.1002/9781444344431.ch88","title":"Searle and the Chinese Room Argument","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); State (computer science); Citation; Philosophy; Classics; Art; Law; Political science; Medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03473904598967871,"score_gpt":0.2454509603869263,"score_spread":0.21071191439724757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482119929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004522062,0.0026206293,0.000012312746,0.0004981009,0.00092741934,0.00022233825,0.00002018045,0.00008962469,0.99556416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019724432,0.00046477333,0.00003998903,0.0009628525,0.001499138,0.00001786139,0.000009918913,0.000116982344,0.994916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944925,0.0000690565,0.00010557247,0.0001588194,0.00008911962,0.00012820843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995437,0.00006562917,0.00008311813,0.0002539592,0.000022070662,0.000031499836],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020477151,0.00016811785,0.0002676373,0.00004006131,0.00011642841,0.00006811607,0.00012988616,0.000104155915,0.023356806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010953361,0.00007912863,0.000080398895,0.0000074185987,0.00070908864,0.000021069389,0.000055300825,0.0002125011,0.00041553742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054746197,0.000015332836,0.000018391625,0.000037355814,0.000078104655,7.356856e-7,0.00863732,4.056363e-9,7.137637e-8,0.61880267,0.37207982,0.00032472302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038913364,0.000015355774,0.00001669392,0.000021658545,0.000043710705,7.922884e-7,0.0005683257,0.000001348667,5.494309e-7,0.027967194,0.9708565,0.000118726675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038314427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014024344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5987767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000035609985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015001887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97753596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484922772","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2010.01371.x","title":"ASSERTION AND CAPITULATION","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Utterance; Coercion (linguistics); Ideology; Speech act; Context (archaeology); sort; Resistance (ecology); Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science; History; Arithmetic; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03470307404019345,"score_gpt":0.25083842446667476,"score_spread":0.2161353504264813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484922772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80140764,0.000057206606,0.00010251555,0.018476825,0.0021696517,0.00018573795,0.000025140658,0.00017409024,0.1774012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967876,0.0000030302297,0.00008416593,0.00019487826,0.0019821534,0.00001335675,0.000026044707,0.000015450525,0.0008933417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991061,0.000060044124,0.00021855913,0.00024881985,0.00016097401,0.00020547591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938136,0.000107034575,0.00007135645,0.00021802579,0.00010516732,0.00011702672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003056796,0.00013490288,0.00016978555,0.000060164937,0.0003595845,0.00013351183,0.000077158795,0.00013536793,0.00032392138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033542663,0.000117722186,0.00005992917,0.000020903248,0.0005135765,0.00024490053,0.000006818027,0.00049922254,0.00009929106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013447383,0.00005760137,0.000103948885,0.000020422996,0.0000125564575,0.0000024225549,0.021802988,7.396079e-8,0.0027013987,0.97168964,0.00018089195,0.0034146071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027379944,0.00027743628,0.00095169083,0.000008812921,0.000024915233,0.000009374951,0.002183547,0.00024456275,0.000052486535,0.961288,0.034473155,0.00021222908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003106528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025801166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19537994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000060308207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016878135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48005715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486871773","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3893","title":"Govier’s Distinguishing A Priori from Inductive Arguments by Analogy: Implications for a General Theory of Ground Adequacy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Warrant; Ceteris paribus; A priori and a posteriori; Intuition; Epistemology; Property (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Inductive reasoning; Defeasible estate; Defeasible reasoning; Mathematics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.08940304955744048,"score_gpt":0.29413801357619,"score_spread":0.20473496401874952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486871773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9198047,0.00029574428,0.0024672449,0.0005940525,0.00063864293,0.00076899177,0.0008278798,0.00006466242,0.07453811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936803,0.0000122490355,0.001178744,0.0010950783,0.0005886568,0.00018088169,0.0003335013,0.0000135985165,0.0029169917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990612,0.00004940993,0.00038422423,0.00015796244,0.00008505923,0.00026209743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987889,0.00031664548,0.00029821432,0.0002100688,0.000327765,0.00005839276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024051423,0.0001438866,0.00025158035,0.000043948225,0.0002897993,0.00010764781,0.00023077575,0.0000947352,0.00019883632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021711258,0.00011593392,0.00010362557,0.000033000353,0.0004125961,0.0005714197,0.000062958534,0.00018897087,0.000032693802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001664204,0.00006226102,0.0011765775,0.000029549386,0.00010110516,1.03188064e-7,0.021148514,0.0000015724345,0.00036038877,0.96803254,0.0014961584,0.007574586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006554465,0.00026778728,0.021676848,0.000026241016,0.00010169315,0.0000010878395,0.005949993,0.000070111884,0.00015664089,0.8764571,0.09432935,0.00030768345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019756763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022229213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09283319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003013859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005114519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47276482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489834304","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.431","title":"Three Naturalistic Accounts of the Epistemology of Argument","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Naturalism; Epistemology; Virtue; Philosophy; Naturalistic observation; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08681934052222458,"score_gpt":0.2591182896405862,"score_spread":0.17229894911836163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489834304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8212403,0.00031589397,0.000039771923,0.00038022225,0.0015430677,0.000213197,0.000056718352,0.000022929566,0.17618789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99703336,0.000024868743,0.000057551115,0.0007163765,0.00014906435,0.0000056207878,0.0000063345037,0.000005138287,0.0020017163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991183,0.000028617234,0.00039579882,0.00008071301,0.00019156582,0.00018496955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908453,0.0001192201,0.00030213586,0.000271275,0.00020076834,0.000022094493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019325443,0.000108509026,0.00025672695,0.000040282423,0.00018820133,0.000006807345,0.0003080896,0.00008446461,0.00022939162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007976409,0.000064598215,0.00014211728,0.000033028096,0.0013737142,0.00013613794,0.000093270704,0.00021345346,0.000031752075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026827185,0.000051381925,0.0041986206,0.00011595619,0.00004535405,0.0000031398984,0.012027309,0.000022664324,0.000057180383,0.9823674,0.00080352527,0.00028065807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031193765,0.0017156539,0.25330406,0.00028190145,0.00033154825,0.00029688148,0.0071163005,0.00036200468,0.006089339,0.33105287,0.3951198,0.0012102885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003730097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000640082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6513145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013278726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006937243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5061507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493333246","doi":"10.1111/meta.12044","title":"Getting Luck Properly Under Control","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Attribution; Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Analogy; Value (mathematics); Control (management); Positive economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Epistemology; Computer science; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0565495966401459,"score_gpt":0.24089496213491396,"score_spread":0.18434536549476804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493333246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1566043,0.0018969255,0.00062324986,0.03608565,0.0030343654,0.0014038814,0.00004444406,0.00049452594,0.7998127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800924,0.000009023654,0.00022789983,0.007429152,0.0023368257,0.00010850523,0.000010442046,0.000044407156,0.009741329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849516,0.00017567557,0.00036237604,0.00033009026,0.0002527032,0.00038396768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988959,0.00015628146,0.00014890327,0.00038243155,0.00030460485,0.00011190183],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034846252,0.00024349005,0.00039742107,0.00010534463,0.0004201968,0.0002529515,0.00026133328,0.000092711576,0.001876357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054738117,0.00018400037,0.00022276604,0.000042829306,0.00057077856,0.000444062,0.000036412097,0.0003670008,0.0023932322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007199856,0.000092971575,0.000099669276,0.00004988025,0.00019246449,0.0000031975685,0.005626772,0.00000806035,0.0007733723,0.98909235,0.0026033942,0.0014506396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010203618,0.00020098062,0.0005559422,0.000032104672,0.00019813862,0.000004768659,0.00187625,0.00017840111,0.00023703834,0.78144795,0.21369769,0.0005503748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036851733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000074592775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8234881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002012239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034166398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494846022","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2012.01446.x","title":"Contextualism and the Knowledge Norms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Epistemology; Assertion; Normative; Norm (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.061458039001556795,"score_gpt":0.2717297105392614,"score_spread":0.21027167153770462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494846022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048644803,0.0045645265,0.000084086845,0.04011063,0.002821223,0.0004278188,0.000042495034,0.00016690705,0.9031375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99065906,0.000020640988,0.00001120787,0.0007650102,0.0043957406,0.000041898023,0.000007580922,0.000021746691,0.004077087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985908,0.00028702433,0.00030561708,0.00020931309,0.00016505402,0.00044213538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986654,0.00062408583,0.00009010816,0.00032121208,0.000105029416,0.0001941424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000999709,0.00020611961,0.0003488328,0.000044612992,0.000619069,0.00013165899,0.00017772072,0.0001106763,0.00020569895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056127297,0.0001201195,0.00013690804,0.000030561525,0.0025390307,0.00027524983,0.000023916351,0.00046377836,0.00039909032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045656092,0.00009467362,0.000023581091,0.000024133848,0.000038797178,7.8603983e-7,0.1698471,6.0064416e-9,0.000011459075,0.82717526,0.0007228399,0.002015719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012164932,0.00017775904,0.00013754265,0.00001842882,0.00006301258,0.000015220382,0.014144447,0.000028046761,0.0000051600214,0.8050321,0.17891729,0.00024450463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027150409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046924008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9420143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012557132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018731265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9355165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496680931","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511807039.002","title":"ARGUMENTS AND DIALOGUES","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"History; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06642981920992914,"score_gpt":0.21131934346891162,"score_spread":0.1448895242589825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496680931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022392106,0.00046868547,0.000009898346,0.000042081043,0.00057868066,0.00022272854,0.00041010964,0.00010311879,0.9979408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001985679,0.00040532707,0.000023702863,0.00022625583,0.0011671651,4.5758935e-7,0.00007931209,0.000038496095,0.9960736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905694,0.000034139415,0.00015277318,0.00037549128,0.0001588486,0.00022183917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991947,0.000074528514,0.00017478783,0.00030536018,0.00013176908,0.00011886915],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000869558,0.00030810447,0.0003880216,0.00010925371,0.00035574017,0.00008241308,0.00023529198,0.00026049025,0.000025895217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004934001,0.00034139954,0.00015220854,9.318187e-7,0.0010572772,0.00010646453,0.00020760729,0.0004675572,0.0000362561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022691842,0.000008127643,0.0000010184679,0.00007648842,0.00015469131,0.000054313812,0.0016712768,8.0627274e-8,0.0000029527364,0.96857196,0.028034683,0.001401725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033448948,0.00004501493,0.0000034301295,0.000088217865,0.00025567468,0.0000032173045,0.00018191627,0.0000026786408,0.000021004373,0.00026173855,0.9984494,0.0003532271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022558068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008381691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9704147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006237636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045529097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507824196","doi":"10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00243.x","title":"Virtue Epistemology and the ‘Epistemic Fitness’ of Democracy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemic virtue; Epistemology; Virtue; Normative; Democracy; Social epistemology; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12595829196741012,"score_gpt":0.35493702633302304,"score_spread":0.22897873436561292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507824196","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035410135,0.84704757,0.000016410568,0.05332301,0.0009565802,0.00054067984,0.000024423884,0.000031526823,0.09451876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9106806,0.07758327,0.000032801756,0.008976185,0.0007665216,0.00006341862,0.0000030435049,0.000014709542,0.0018794797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998132,0.00054169935,0.00055786036,0.00015329885,0.00014193193,0.0004732262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723315,0.0020120123,0.00016659267,0.0002667646,0.0002078827,0.000113618786],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013295899,0.00017948462,0.00094476296,0.000019335126,0.0003222172,0.000010880863,0.00015240678,0.00004690444,0.00013664123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012353322,0.00009776951,0.00018416575,0.000031472802,0.004695218,0.00009249907,0.00016351856,0.0002238556,0.000062602645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000722703,0.00003466588,0.0003731287,0.004221015,0.00015849099,6.197365e-7,0.0024065208,4.764464e-9,5.7057764e-7,0.9900947,0.0013484954,0.0013545319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008722049,0.00009590553,0.00068549626,0.0018521632,0.0010614826,0.00005954624,0.004410986,0.000002096329,0.000022034279,0.5025483,0.48805723,0.00033259715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013093295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042326803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90713954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026681922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001876762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99801344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507974668","doi":"","title":"Gender and Philosophical Intuition (Final Draft)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Philosophical methodology; Epistemology; Philosophical theory; Philosophical analysis; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12091564120388351,"score_gpt":0.2665457676904777,"score_spread":0.1456301264865942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507974668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6526662,0.00815441,0.005236598,0.0027416772,0.0019111669,0.0002604256,0.000010982762,0.00014287586,0.32887563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947955,0.0014257969,0.000051684376,0.00038832938,0.0016678628,0.0000032086707,0.0000029153393,0.000018583427,0.0016461166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983441,0.00009997501,0.00022133855,0.00015980304,0.00015399697,0.0010207877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995686,0.00003133261,0.00010837138,0.00010152738,0.00011072541,0.00007948369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009495308,0.00013419059,0.00016638638,0.00007915022,0.00042274364,0.000064271226,0.00012600473,0.00008276489,0.00031768932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025001109,0.000111398644,0.00008941608,0.000018574028,0.00040042514,0.00023622869,0.000027149526,0.0018080004,0.000049904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000368248,0.00005955869,0.00017982506,0.000008478954,0.00009291438,0.0000047045073,0.0100718,7.888367e-8,0.000025292495,0.98671496,0.000058130816,0.0027474556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003735818,0.00029180493,0.00031431843,0.000008490248,0.00005971407,0.00029687525,0.00421004,0.000006585374,0.00002347075,0.98758435,0.0066888137,0.00014192729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006430955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007091784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3421293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011721998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046567366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78549623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1511909973","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00528.x","title":"Unenriched Subsentential Illocutions*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Utterance; Proposition; Situated; Assertion; Sentence; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Contextualism; Reflexivity; Cognitive science; Psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; History","score_opus":0.6866357735320964,"score_gpt":0.3794618017876594,"score_spread":0.30717397174443695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1511909973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049370255,0.0010741702,0.000036980662,0.0025511424,0.00033717373,0.00022915752,0.00002211396,0.00008545786,0.94629353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955717,0.0003076761,0.00013507155,0.00029693777,0.0009685702,0.0000350691,0.000011926794,0.000012815862,0.002660286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818116,0.00035951045,0.00023150451,0.000376691,0.00033200422,0.0005191108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892527,0.0002878368,0.000042098698,0.00025622686,0.00031613748,0.00017243279],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009842569,0.00014736019,0.00022952321,0.00015536443,0.0008605229,0.0000819336,0.0002802897,0.00012407548,0.0023733228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018286782,0.000109754226,0.00007602922,0.00009819821,0.0030270547,0.00014288539,0.00019821273,0.0007678506,0.0003451798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008647848,0.00024087516,0.00015822912,0.000029562427,0.000042870273,0.000014062201,0.021025406,4.9119343e-8,0.00003030922,0.97687435,0.00024733436,0.0012504762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002730642,0.000468822,0.00022810927,0.000009409347,0.000012564395,0.0000027312794,0.0035547398,0.0000060457555,0.00002573494,0.960348,0.0349226,0.0001481826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019384125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042447384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9462014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021717353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003089995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515361935","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i2.3530","title":"The Ethics of Argumentation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Rationality; Epistemology; Normative; Heuristics; Dialectic; Defeasible estate; Reflective equilibrium; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14280636011229497,"score_gpt":0.32591763813883684,"score_spread":0.18311127802654187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515361935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12605736,0.00078157696,0.00016930653,0.0020596746,0.0027601991,0.00017336565,0.000014779463,0.000050805098,0.8679329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942655,0.00007369796,0.000066094806,0.0012119532,0.0004132683,0.000005919668,0.000008076855,0.0000032909888,0.0039521907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994394,0.000045017663,0.00018891296,0.000028205755,0.00012930884,0.00016913126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993469,0.00030345534,0.00011721056,0.00010239175,0.00010452716,0.000025522419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008084402,0.000053466734,0.00007170098,0.00001618009,0.00033316814,0.000032163978,0.00009629904,0.000057145557,0.00011488128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010022415,0.000031695025,0.000048401616,0.000012466798,0.0004246422,0.00031374148,0.000024491112,0.00025180014,0.00010412224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061176083,0.000013358949,0.00043171606,0.000020642328,0.000011233087,4.8054492e-8,0.05184823,0.0000020694465,0.000012560199,0.9456443,0.0003491482,0.0016605577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014976122,0.00009688486,0.0022668173,0.0000088198685,0.00002302644,0.0000017219633,0.014587601,0.000015147787,0.000614747,0.031472877,0.9506652,0.0000973959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058809466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013218728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9503161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000057107445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023455688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25624937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518980779","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i4.2964","title":"Attacking Character: Ad Hominem Argument and Virtue Epistemology","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Argument (complex analysis); Possession (linguistics); Virtue; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.04225190225435377,"score_gpt":0.263600631053002,"score_spread":0.22134872879864825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518980779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7929802,0.00012862476,0.000028015555,0.0011494935,0.0026113952,0.00018256025,0.000024441406,0.00009914668,0.20279612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99023,0.000029256014,0.00017825741,0.0028705816,0.00071098714,0.000018887094,0.000029142695,0.000012428288,0.005920416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990436,0.000030739815,0.00032817273,0.00017799227,0.000115667994,0.00030384166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992997,0.00012184592,0.00016168233,0.00022869803,0.00009588125,0.00009218266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000380139,0.00018277825,0.00026967537,0.00007583299,0.00032963048,0.00013012075,0.00016691154,0.0001530704,0.00043771777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055631826,0.0001448649,0.00007672783,0.000017282713,0.0006646281,0.0003841343,0.000102773316,0.00054706953,0.0002498997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024231784,0.000039610302,0.00154919,0.000067648514,0.000033732966,0.000014516567,0.007380411,6.3096223e-7,0.00070977956,0.9826996,0.00025236668,0.007228313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007474072,0.00038801855,0.01360109,0.000024602576,0.00005002965,0.00010916369,0.0016051376,0.000106630294,0.00044149486,0.019055167,0.9633975,0.0004737691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055657787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007514767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9636444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008251368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003164463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5907419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525845722","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i3.4055","title":"Arguments that take Counterconsiderations into Account","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Adversary; Balance (ability); Point (geometry); Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07919431369611842,"score_gpt":0.274950669893693,"score_spread":0.1957563561975746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525845722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13669981,0.00009546405,0.0008214972,0.0014314993,0.0023496707,0.00022327727,0.000024909683,0.00017323758,0.85818064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842545,0.00001566731,0.0002119712,0.008185797,0.00057460304,0.000021328047,0.000042043182,0.000009052859,0.0066850875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919176,0.000034209577,0.00024079073,0.00011897475,0.00017763056,0.00023662015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937475,0.000110001594,0.00011094221,0.00021525669,0.00013426898,0.000054766293],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032983697,0.00013783482,0.00017272192,0.000057561854,0.00049150974,0.00025418372,0.00015263932,0.00007620276,0.00085811253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000658255,0.00010871268,0.00007884449,0.000014844941,0.00034609705,0.00066038826,0.000050610128,0.00020783591,0.0008441833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006123976,0.000029937577,0.00051629747,0.00003090299,0.00002541665,0.0000011970831,0.019702531,0.000017932007,0.000014076714,0.97464436,0.003337742,0.0016734914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002753723,0.000116587384,0.0005867367,0.000015174323,0.000022505381,0.0000046873142,0.002661161,0.00021171673,0.000106475476,0.06786986,0.92793685,0.00019290169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023444112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018653182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9245991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020497566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003792562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526910648","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1041","title":"Deep Disagreement, Rational Resolutions, and Critical Thinking","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Epistemology; Key (lock); Philosophy; Point (geometry); Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06903815881425727,"score_gpt":0.296677684418392,"score_spread":0.2276395256041347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526910648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05162849,0.0016226139,0.0053200866,0.013482603,0.0011967288,0.00025442636,0.000040978928,0.00020767233,0.9262464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98972946,0.000037787897,0.0016269521,0.004709736,0.0011331134,0.000010063778,0.000028845421,0.0000049783534,0.0027190705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932927,0.000024606814,0.00020703103,0.00009144235,0.00014920252,0.00019844435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958944,0.0001503196,0.000038540868,0.00008791727,0.000083646984,0.000050151026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002582428,0.00008545607,0.00009753905,0.000037949376,0.0006228587,0.00013548753,0.00008259968,0.000051744246,0.0006685593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010390819,0.00006949953,0.000040106548,0.000012116239,0.0005341748,0.0005631498,0.00005487085,0.00018135714,0.00014156307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006735544,0.000023363273,0.00021753578,0.00001776514,0.000008806018,0.000001243564,0.014472124,0.000025628296,0.0000027281108,0.98249966,0.00089124276,0.0018331415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034493871,0.00013882943,0.0016135112,0.000018931158,0.00003442188,0.000022522641,0.0034673451,0.002292649,0.000017915738,0.1487831,0.84302145,0.000244388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019966466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043734378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.938101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000125999795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024413928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73202556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530082090","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2152","title":"Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Philosophy; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.09082178350827413,"score_gpt":0.2956670442864488,"score_spread":0.20484526077817466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530082090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36850813,0.0006486402,0.00017669285,0.0016493519,0.0013980251,0.0003605929,0.000011691605,0.000091155685,0.6271557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960964,0.000046206602,0.00015128142,0.0018180559,0.00039333006,0.0000159372,0.000013474926,0.0000045632814,0.0014608005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994247,0.000018897352,0.00016445316,0.000081238606,0.00015957205,0.00015116464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961,0.000031934855,0.000059724553,0.00009637266,0.0001611022,0.00004086785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038811984,0.00007999842,0.0000979902,0.000036703732,0.00022988311,0.00008146161,0.00005755642,0.00004130085,0.00028826058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007297467,0.000063384585,0.000032032185,0.000013417455,0.00028281755,0.00024171075,0.000027480191,0.00011807285,0.00012338822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005821135,0.000024772058,0.00015567476,0.000019049296,0.000016743312,0.0000010500124,0.021850934,0.000091205766,0.0000058890587,0.9741874,0.00018993676,0.003451566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015556541,0.00044304336,0.0031159022,0.000027060625,0.00010250218,0.000014010237,0.0044839107,0.00012051003,0.00029083758,0.57249725,0.41700575,0.0003435965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001265252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049703644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6275882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025459323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006676576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3156251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536530691","doi":"10.47925/2011.268","title":"An Optimistic Take on Pessimistic Pedagogy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Illusion; Epistemology; George (robot); Section (typography); Dystopia; Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Law; Psychology; History; Art history; Political science; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.20279042381124626,"score_gpt":0.3499665255824054,"score_spread":0.1471761017711591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536530691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09856163,0.000171046,0.00009394908,0.0010246432,0.002898279,0.00018100228,0.000026791391,0.000055829947,0.89698684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957694,0.000010193222,0.00043248382,0.0005033313,0.0017479417,0.000021093136,0.000047206802,0.000017434457,0.0014509626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992745,0.00006743556,0.00022238755,0.00019391767,0.000117426614,0.00012436343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991442,0.00006915293,0.00016281678,0.00032274332,0.00022979715,0.00007131473],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001360356,0.00011812084,0.00016481105,0.00009567346,0.00014212483,0.000017893524,0.00016840188,0.000050731895,0.0009674037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065696324,0.00011142851,0.000060749964,0.000021020118,0.00035376303,0.00013092738,0.000006805714,0.0001332501,0.00008470945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027741893,0.00081317266,0.000073652445,0.000089799585,0.000016250957,3.1347926e-7,0.03479004,0.0000027666897,0.00006545543,0.96165246,0.00036857356,0.0020997738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020389099,0.0007637705,0.0017007927,0.00009640711,0.00011435368,0.0000019809715,0.0040346803,0.00004655926,0.0006540332,0.9798754,0.01222575,0.00028240593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002133873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004120105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89720774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017992705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017607883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542052916","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i2.541","title":"Investigating the Shared Background Required for Argument: A Critique of Fogelin’s Thesis on Deep Disagreement","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.17176234708785432,"score_gpt":0.3072356358019974,"score_spread":0.1354732887141431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542052916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7617048,0.0004890154,0.0011179616,0.004414695,0.0011281576,0.0016201977,0.00026349354,0.00014006648,0.22912158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99211854,0.000043818476,0.00061474054,0.0047898134,0.00039730166,0.00012941303,0.000045619003,0.000013252967,0.0018475038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885833,0.000054680546,0.00045718905,0.00013609305,0.00020980206,0.00028392466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987932,0.00048139962,0.00023545271,0.00025464257,0.00018519683,0.000050099054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004613452,0.0001617358,0.00024032402,0.00004392,0.00059249246,0.0000551428,0.00025635955,0.00007230422,0.00016434967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001758768,0.000102629565,0.00017241128,0.000028067565,0.0007568758,0.00029459296,0.000052313346,0.00016785787,0.000027684724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047997866,0.00008570833,0.00019205379,0.00017909783,0.0000798078,0.000001726947,0.07679998,0.000056298428,0.00010808937,0.91962,0.0014900457,0.0013391952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003748216,0.0038932178,0.0046685487,0.0005271905,0.0003106754,0.00003329021,0.07051161,0.0036290926,0.0040047215,0.2959108,0.6113632,0.0013994812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014121452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032002808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6237092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023791117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005285237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4557033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546474866","doi":"","title":"Strength and promise","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thirdspace","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics","score_opus":0.0468780013437343,"score_gpt":0.25317013983516196,"score_spread":0.20629213849142766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546474866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.340351,0.0009100557,0.000013626334,0.0013092286,0.00058573304,0.00014129048,0.000008912956,0.00009868236,0.6565815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9205615,0.00007893588,0.00026448243,0.00045364187,0.0002397248,0.000007721331,0.0000022051954,0.000015244436,0.078376524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994715,0.00007155136,0.00008328376,0.00013916672,0.000077730794,0.00015678022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963456,0.00007462374,0.00004016287,0.00014902995,0.000046123805,0.00005549416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021679567,0.00009086038,0.00012537146,0.000024113915,0.00018596606,0.00006179683,0.00004873301,0.000041525906,0.0003149372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007638643,0.00007589925,0.000030022566,0.000012858233,0.00030903457,0.00008654681,0.000013006467,0.00015491854,0.000075431504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037149114,0.000033366116,0.00012770883,0.000028898607,0.000015302683,0.0000023709174,0.02380914,2.1792131e-7,0.00006811596,0.97098345,0.0045428793,0.00038482877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003066208,0.00006388824,0.00011274138,0.000015050719,0.000026781408,0.000004208451,0.0057091885,0.0000075858115,0.0006036757,0.038516607,0.95447755,0.00015611672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007193782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005672832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94993466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006675159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029678551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34483415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549987018","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i2.2142","title":"Toulmin's Model of Argument and the Question of Relativism (J. A. Blair Prize, 2005)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Relativism; Epistemology; Warrant; Philosophy; Field (mathematics); Key (lock); Mathematics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.04672540263891843,"score_gpt":0.26036375560586483,"score_spread":0.2136383529669464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549987018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5905929,0.0007507318,0.0033909273,0.0022018352,0.00038727897,0.0005461123,0.000043077544,0.000052553896,0.40203458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963789,0.00011810642,0.00043009227,0.0003554083,0.00006116564,0.0000075257326,0.000005271139,0.0000039630563,0.002639563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993686,0.000026671973,0.00029026877,0.00006185216,0.00012468337,0.00012789684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994964,0.000069322654,0.00019529593,0.00012693036,0.00008913608,0.000022898887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004700789,0.000082281884,0.00018761767,0.00003318524,0.00009797989,0.000014127342,0.000081856146,0.000057147492,0.000023439523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003935493,0.000049361173,0.00006135266,0.0000121189205,0.00092521857,0.0002128336,0.00003897389,0.00014677574,0.000006096726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005015316,0.00002868269,0.000028962224,0.000053619082,0.000021084817,2.2531337e-7,0.021097044,0.002407229,0.000031183212,0.9759124,0.00003644174,0.00033298667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031885123,0.00039982647,0.0006065093,0.00012914492,0.000117771735,0.000005551595,0.003120215,0.004317869,0.0014531168,0.9737962,0.012625765,0.00023955174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017790533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017252489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.405786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010683883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049337836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34090063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552040573","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i2.1226","title":"Analogies and Other Minds","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Inference; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0862112021793719,"score_gpt":0.2794089140838773,"score_spread":0.1931977119045054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552040573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08367118,0.00031516986,0.00004497999,0.0007052665,0.0002546514,0.0000657322,0.000012504342,0.00008004782,0.9148505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829669,0.000022314336,0.00019925098,0.008759573,0.00033738062,0.000002199626,0.000004387116,0.0000037039192,0.0077043087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995336,0.000011734645,0.00013949271,0.000074334326,0.000070188384,0.00017065411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997434,0.000035789635,0.00005026772,0.00009982596,0.000037820264,0.00003288818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001300217,0.000088308516,0.00012173949,0.000042612435,0.00015561043,0.000083623134,0.00008108755,0.000053902062,0.00025125078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002133602,0.00006415128,0.000040506686,0.000013433537,0.00029669632,0.00021141108,0.000017678785,0.00012258402,0.00008263865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008747063,0.000013876578,0.0002529244,0.000009450283,0.000008949478,0.0000023941718,0.009437142,0.0000016714935,0.000007788673,0.9764554,0.0015270916,0.012274584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020871153,0.00029341283,0.0036876996,0.000008504537,0.0000143477455,0.0000072252033,0.0026931483,0.00003800521,0.000043126878,0.050871104,0.94197553,0.00015917943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005578781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001602056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94044846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003663015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000114855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.275102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W155548036","doi":"10.7202/1044462ar","title":"An Epistemic Argument in Support of Liberal Neutrality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Argument (complex analysis); Neutrality; Action (physics); Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Harm; Law and economics; Seriousness; Set (abstract data type); Vagueness; Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Computer science; Fuzzy logic","score_opus":0.04925576707159765,"score_gpt":0.2993630143034923,"score_spread":0.2501072472318947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W155548036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93084735,0.00005504286,0.00006249091,0.0014288971,0.00045607047,0.00016458264,0.000031559972,0.00005276473,0.06690123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945317,0.000044269043,0.00027047415,0.0028010579,0.0005082675,0.000013858707,0.000022730324,0.00001974007,0.0017879182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987129,0.00025770123,0.00037091994,0.00022743204,0.00011410378,0.00031695268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992706,0.000065445456,0.00013273857,0.00030475107,0.00014123843,0.00008520953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000792178,0.00014306701,0.00027475253,0.00007460532,0.00011525236,0.000036881887,0.00022167446,0.00018288348,0.00039273687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025085134,0.0001345956,0.000088889334,0.00003263071,0.00094923755,0.00016034007,0.000027328264,0.00038082927,0.000031507876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079248115,0.0001977267,0.010898206,0.0001736024,0.000040719347,0.000018417157,0.104268424,0.0000119147935,0.0025870001,0.87904584,0.0017040825,0.0009748369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020130768,0.0026109917,0.023182338,0.00020865421,0.000118817516,0.000038074577,0.015370642,0.00026082157,0.041053534,0.68323183,0.23067951,0.0012317253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019498469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007974678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22897543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007357829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008816797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54886496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558336695","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2262","title":"Informal Logic: An Overview","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; sort; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy of logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Information retrieval; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.16255535349708566,"score_gpt":0.3147098564452695,"score_spread":0.15215450294818383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558336695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11010931,0.00067151757,0.000011244744,0.000300909,0.0006252015,0.00018835059,0.000042734344,0.00023226587,0.88781846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8904568,0.0012722297,0.0004352156,0.02894338,0.0021795193,0.00004437254,0.00024799412,0.000034733603,0.07638578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998576,0.000047092057,0.0004714629,0.00016370804,0.00023912567,0.00050262857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992114,0.00005330519,0.00012013731,0.0003550771,0.0001206655,0.0001394412],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038438104,0.0002394524,0.0003030803,0.000069330745,0.000444203,0.00021258932,0.00035598504,0.00015394954,0.013865483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022558113,0.00018239426,0.00015876195,0.000045471053,0.0005026465,0.0016684037,0.000053742817,0.00039512137,0.0027572925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040216044,0.00006522682,0.000095972915,0.00007053348,0.00002399262,0.000009481725,0.020106861,0.00007044075,0.0000020114453,0.9344297,0.0010099425,0.044075627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036057545,0.00046027574,0.0011286581,0.00001960759,0.000025523026,0.000019889645,0.0017979809,0.00013197781,0.000018609744,0.021159325,0.9745502,0.00032741931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024730075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062730553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9735402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000138124515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006377568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99801916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566284763","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i4.3620","title":"The Paradox of Charity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Interpretation (philosophy); Dialectic; Epistemology; Informal logic; Point (geometry); Limit (mathematics); Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10705498735975393,"score_gpt":0.2826222878400397,"score_spread":0.17556730048028574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566284763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18212245,0.00094070326,0.000026940697,0.00047408065,0.0017182877,0.000110897105,0.000014854435,0.00003909461,0.81455266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99456996,0.00005701502,0.000023839208,0.00057137257,0.00051421055,0.000005611967,0.0000037098546,0.0000028585591,0.0042514475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994413,0.000022801742,0.00018396476,0.000032349715,0.00009789067,0.00022167533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952835,0.0001271246,0.00009880252,0.00014441115,0.000066260036,0.000035041863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046179572,0.00006168774,0.000099676094,0.000013824386,0.00027287047,0.000027192898,0.00013945744,0.000039494695,0.00017152097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047160363,0.000034778448,0.00006524268,0.000011831195,0.00051006814,0.0002743964,0.00003731036,0.00014584447,0.00015435315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006853103,0.00001996089,0.0011657032,0.000016083026,0.000011528456,1.0435336e-7,0.01493978,5.108439e-7,0.000004617013,0.9810293,0.0006296912,0.0021758983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010418473,0.0000722357,0.0052186493,0.000004993261,0.00001432607,0.0000022496583,0.0032864,0.000010699236,0.00019557192,0.021480782,0.9695222,0.000087751585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007626801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000100105106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96889246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000039599645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001519571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20987266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567080196","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i3.4019","title":"Conductive Argument, An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Defeasible reasoning; Defeasible estate; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.12153300483844601,"score_gpt":0.3028597746975162,"score_spread":0.18132676985907017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567080196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64404285,0.0000795674,0.000009342345,0.000048074475,0.0002866489,0.0001379134,0.0000060131265,0.00004065143,0.35534894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99462444,0.0000140782995,0.00047804433,0.000848753,0.00016349246,0.0000076026217,0.000024943247,0.0000066464295,0.0038319929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933505,0.000031234664,0.00022557391,0.00009517544,0.00011138705,0.00020156548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928355,0.00004024344,0.00015387416,0.00017447339,0.0002910361,0.000056822166],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015994179,0.00010576986,0.00018593528,0.00005010047,0.00012879125,0.00007092848,0.00013202081,0.0000650451,0.0011996245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054314423,0.00008316991,0.00005615073,0.000027914777,0.00029498537,0.0008338487,0.000028593638,0.00016108331,0.00026098648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001790211,0.000049219747,0.00081792584,0.00002673034,0.00002763815,7.0788883e-7,0.013670418,0.0000144725445,0.00031045437,0.98368114,0.0003958201,0.000987544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031720551,0.0074615125,0.052818153,0.00025882744,0.00027162145,0.000033323406,0.07372656,0.0013955914,0.0075637368,0.46049815,0.39091557,0.0018848984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050922576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008860218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.523183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010516664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000428024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568403290","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00417.x","title":"Contingent A Priori Knowledge","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.39910909695325986,"score_gpt":0.4157532890360827,"score_spread":0.016644192082822862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568403290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120524496,0.0011572366,0.0000039748816,0.0050851107,0.00059697067,0.00025030161,0.000014975941,0.000072234456,0.8722947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919396,0.00015437859,0.00008852173,0.00023488213,0.002679422,0.00005118178,0.000006379236,0.000014121736,0.0048314994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831694,0.0002576119,0.00022294064,0.00039368958,0.0002741357,0.0005346692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982921,0.00080827286,0.00004165563,0.0002854203,0.00036948806,0.00020308128],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016543614,0.00015188528,0.00025603818,0.00012978831,0.0008642154,0.00017571638,0.0003049518,0.00016058168,0.0011919045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044643253,0.000110473804,0.00006618957,0.00007352293,0.0028244075,0.000106778396,0.00025133608,0.0016832092,0.00037859578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035476463,0.00021274528,0.00011847311,0.000050124032,0.000025138777,0.0000059016566,0.014899379,2.1972404e-8,0.00025336663,0.97856116,0.00034502303,0.0054931715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020513021,0.00025713022,0.00006863409,0.000008246935,0.000005361318,0.0000017435266,0.00069342746,0.0000073046617,0.000018536173,0.6375348,0.36109158,0.00010810412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043382952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017117012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87141514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014208627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055013974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575728999","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2277","title":"Belief and Negation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Negation; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Statement (logic); Informal logic; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04564318697619385,"score_gpt":0.24231837800679357,"score_spread":0.19667519103059972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575728999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2877565,0.00012132535,0.0000071367544,0.00034487818,0.00017272828,0.000055310935,0.000006051912,0.00004949118,0.7114866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9650261,0.0000995115,0.00008001101,0.0027791974,0.0003967809,0.000005101368,0.00001615972,0.000004229769,0.03159294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996206,0.00001100307,0.0001241603,0.000059827176,0.000062417945,0.00012200263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998054,0.000030053125,0.000029208953,0.00007245325,0.000033061144,0.000029844512],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000102542384,0.000062697676,0.000079314115,0.000021799548,0.00019352415,0.00006777225,0.000047745696,0.000041596584,0.0020323533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009180889,0.000049251532,0.000025706748,0.00001014118,0.00022969152,0.00031181716,0.000010622088,0.000103864346,0.00036622817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012256012,0.000014521049,0.00015175351,0.0000213744,0.000008864452,0.0000015026976,0.018502312,0.0000106141115,0.000004718323,0.9268249,0.00082412676,0.053623013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020315549,0.00012564543,0.0017896757,0.0000070018045,0.000010775469,0.000005604945,0.00086675613,0.0000860825,0.00002942857,0.0321562,0.9646062,0.000113423805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000097437434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001647699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96378213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000034917277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010215511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581406839","doi":"10.1002/tht3.7","title":"Knowledge Norms and Acting Well","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.09713036496291498,"score_gpt":0.30029271442886024,"score_spread":0.20316234946594525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581406839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19751298,0.014795373,0.00011465041,0.0026590535,0.004537165,0.00010340175,0.0000075744642,0.000031700187,0.7802381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842541,0.0001623615,0.0002948832,0.00034451936,0.012510554,7.433093e-7,7.5155134e-7,0.000020092008,0.0024119571],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991132,0.00009507408,0.00034290343,0.00007306536,0.00013915353,0.00023661816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990217,0.00018444355,0.00033903075,0.00010828947,0.00019623514,0.00015030801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076123996,0.00013329356,0.00029252772,0.00011133829,0.0002250483,0.00005590266,0.00013426537,0.000058533846,0.00021420667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053218504,0.00009676918,0.00013292836,0.000031027135,0.0003015871,0.0005978243,0.000043652795,0.0004339025,0.00008370273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046634148,0.00021836386,0.0008176014,0.00013043861,0.0001269248,0.0000073465253,0.05406923,3.5282036e-7,0.00023200786,0.93825704,0.0019497359,0.004144313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062903407,0.00021989182,0.00022947813,0.00013791755,0.00014993461,0.00010345025,0.0017159119,0.000005535137,0.0005994781,0.15153153,0.8444469,0.00023093064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000040482055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010374212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84249717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018024342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030694886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39461327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581876134","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i3.1137","title":"Useful Argumentation: A Critique of the Epistemological Approach","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Argumentative; Criticism; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07410902803833037,"score_gpt":0.2813987166423169,"score_spread":0.20728968860398655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581876134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2081829,0.00016466962,0.00030599922,0.0021921757,0.0005126493,0.00029392054,0.0000271261,0.000065790875,0.7882548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98737144,0.000011939622,0.000654675,0.004005378,0.000500431,0.000022881866,0.0000114174645,0.0000056905214,0.0074161454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908984,0.000075589705,0.0003513358,0.00010752062,0.00017498757,0.00020074288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993846,0.00008779732,0.0001529434,0.00021776033,0.00012243107,0.000034477813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003220057,0.0001162229,0.0001873943,0.000030302946,0.00022655902,0.00004537163,0.00026779564,0.00009050249,0.0004118718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054725348,0.000068786925,0.00014690093,0.000033672743,0.00073252525,0.00029008216,0.00007117976,0.00025438788,0.000068846224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013151366,0.00008561259,0.000644503,0.000056426336,0.000018469893,6.014124e-7,0.011924643,0.00007720175,0.000016344953,0.9854509,0.0008241565,0.0008879647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011372193,0.0004451375,0.013008117,0.00005109758,0.00009547367,0.00006925055,0.012624831,0.0006070556,0.0014992781,0.050701328,0.91922104,0.0005401496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042435586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000084842075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9347496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016124453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038881928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45097074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587538784","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i3.3681","title":"Denying the Antecedent: Its Effective Use in Argumentation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Fallacy; Epistemology; Position (finance); Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.10959721154376895,"score_gpt":0.29624302610621644,"score_spread":0.1866458145624475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587538784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92914844,0.000270873,0.000043664935,0.00012380697,0.00094816065,0.00032441693,0.000006839237,0.00003571591,0.06909806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99696714,0.000022191223,0.000017641018,0.0012468768,0.000355256,0.00003929423,0.000009432861,0.000005146557,0.0013370333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993559,0.0000675327,0.000170398,0.000056273875,0.00010100955,0.00024885408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995078,0.00024240297,0.00008011301,0.00009047888,0.0000508739,0.000028322986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004454038,0.000086681255,0.00009859135,0.000049710077,0.00021546298,0.00009168257,0.00009039635,0.00004466606,0.00011033867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008894073,0.000054856402,0.00004663727,0.000028404133,0.00017339208,0.0011755151,0.000037217378,0.00021233245,0.00024037858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025327432,0.0000528203,0.012252348,0.000040772695,0.000022675831,0.0000017126174,0.1397462,0.000032671738,0.000069890986,0.84472585,0.00012659054,0.0029031716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028395923,0.0006597674,0.4073018,0.00021989724,0.00017121239,0.000046937697,0.099146284,0.0007401011,0.0049391957,0.019533375,0.46316808,0.0012337161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014006799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008476657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82519245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000243429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008393624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30896604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587773505","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498855","title":"Appearances of the Good","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":252,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Slogan; Epistemology; Form of the Good; Psychology; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.047430050037428076,"score_gpt":0.21389549977440658,"score_spread":0.16646544973697852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587773505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020689933,0.00038196635,0.000022408605,0.000020959917,0.001257861,0.00027806952,0.00031077242,0.000049962004,0.9974711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023606739,0.000042528667,0.000007808692,0.00012739665,0.00061682775,2.907181e-7,0.000017298747,0.000024972198,0.9968022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989542,0.00009275032,0.00019674125,0.00026185648,0.00026635884,0.00022812116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870586,0.00012094346,0.00036302325,0.0005139044,0.00024136243,0.00005488287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019645743,0.00023548066,0.0003937238,0.00008431305,0.000326879,0.000028460494,0.0006833682,0.00026004206,0.000007521611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009376236,0.00019906736,0.0003552178,0.0000051611837,0.0020410544,0.000056237262,0.00022707277,0.00062389916,0.000008826294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023467474,0.000013482221,0.0000024260146,0.00024438,0.00012850146,0.000012992914,0.0017682377,4.1764002e-7,0.0000048740367,0.918284,0.07924679,0.00027043643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023748892,0.000031535375,0.000012168174,0.00021181021,0.00022827015,0.0000017147044,0.0005312367,0.0000014669221,0.00020659962,0.000133497,0.99819076,0.00021346592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036509885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010617127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91894394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007770152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023745981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8117731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587985520","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2264","title":"The Place of Informal Logic in Philosophy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Epistemology; Parallels; Informal logic; Foundationalism; Connection (principal bundle); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Philosophy; Argumentation theory; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06053618799393396,"score_gpt":0.2578871470784355,"score_spread":0.19735095908450156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587985520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17714393,0.00026251693,0.0000027018611,0.0008191714,0.00033522162,0.0001689152,0.000018002675,0.000039308583,0.8212102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841057,0.00022864107,0.00003987962,0.0021741805,0.00036276507,0.000017046434,0.00001555002,0.000007964589,0.013048267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987919,0.000043006276,0.0005198966,0.00009392074,0.00019632415,0.00035498774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992679,0.00021170155,0.00014820111,0.00024520778,0.00008353322,0.000043499873],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005134625,0.00015512445,0.00023129204,0.00006673918,0.00028796398,0.00006803334,0.0003333959,0.00010344202,0.0009417163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047512727,0.000097648845,0.00011307882,0.000056529443,0.000829149,0.0005074625,0.0000497546,0.00037274646,0.00034864052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010740853,0.000038675436,0.0002939861,0.00004771259,0.000016517799,0.0000037534312,0.0146756945,0.00025364725,0.0000015842598,0.9760713,0.00035781227,0.008131911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087856594,0.0005086315,0.0033318459,0.00004766107,0.000018161005,0.0000109909815,0.0034324992,0.0002690377,0.000055597306,0.10585889,0.8852664,0.00032168385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017118422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082816643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8849086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012662609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059857346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597492954","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i1.4209","title":"Bogency and Goodacies: On Argument Quality in Virtue Argumentation Theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Epistemology; Philosophy; Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.14301484125915587,"score_gpt":0.3319198136403934,"score_spread":0.18890497238123755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597492954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6123546,0.00015575078,0.000054927492,0.00031250593,0.0005212763,0.00017937618,0.00001635728,0.00003898226,0.38636625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947816,0.00002692836,0.00004796832,0.002227899,0.00015143232,0.000019462435,0.000021708034,0.00000494908,0.0027180195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991365,0.00011817344,0.00030083023,0.000114184666,0.00016224616,0.00016803994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951637,0.00013101895,0.000105018546,0.00012497984,0.000059478443,0.00006316455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011466525,0.00011127349,0.0001582228,0.00006683114,0.00009942701,0.00006621284,0.000078808225,0.00005841801,0.00009752437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000102474776,0.0000865153,0.000035622987,0.000021395474,0.00025242078,0.00033723848,0.000034842866,0.00017226224,0.00012042333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070545306,0.00005421007,0.0009192513,0.000026091519,0.000009612875,0.0000017705244,0.03590586,0.000018857758,0.000008167712,0.9608622,0.0001114193,0.0020119767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002236093,0.0012366264,0.011750514,0.000056342098,0.000028974395,0.000004689562,0.06845105,0.00007404784,0.00035276863,0.80550736,0.10977467,0.0005268587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017959715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043882462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38364822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003591581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036797355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35279915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599635683","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00425.x","title":"Unifying the Intellectual Virtues","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Virtue; Trait; Conscientiousness; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Disposition; Cognition; Character traits; Generativity; Psychology; Cognitive science; Sociology; Social psychology; Big Five personality traits; Personality; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.4003030367602114,"score_gpt":0.3891509522163667,"score_spread":0.011152084543844698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599635683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12686558,0.00096186996,0.000014262347,0.015993986,0.00047284045,0.0002303534,0.0000118667,0.00006609852,0.85538316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99481225,0.00030632643,0.000048678732,0.00066199614,0.0020574762,0.000035795783,0.0000045549496,0.000011733522,0.0020612176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839646,0.0003555034,0.00018204193,0.0003005194,0.0003275536,0.00043794085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659085,0.0027361675,0.000031528994,0.00030036195,0.0002288253,0.0001122655],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018394513,0.00013235644,0.00017991733,0.00009567606,0.0015064132,0.00023654124,0.0004238041,0.0001223438,0.0015676565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010690396,0.00007420755,0.000056453868,0.00008672326,0.0047494643,0.00010722871,0.00027220778,0.0021313601,0.00024653977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035898505,0.0000672509,0.000020750509,0.000018282053,0.000022918606,0.000003621531,0.024604358,1.3524864e-7,0.0001409443,0.96896493,0.00032653604,0.005794378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097978846,0.00023571558,0.000018007415,0.0000055196533,0.0000048378774,0.0000026225289,0.0031604024,0.000014188207,0.00002408396,0.75293213,0.24341746,0.00008704542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006629243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012525267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8679466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000096298345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036429952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600275594","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i3.1138","title":"Useful Advice and Good Arguments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04805469277669199,"score_gpt":0.26024519275710234,"score_spread":0.21219049998041034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600275594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22302109,0.0002711494,0.000012857596,0.0007233182,0.000378207,0.00009501819,0.000015351212,0.00010726078,0.7753758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96509457,0.000059501148,0.00031739793,0.0051586046,0.00073417544,0.000007796989,0.00001330745,0.000007491238,0.028607141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937755,0.00001518805,0.000191801,0.000095400865,0.00010411415,0.00021593747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996517,0.000044172994,0.000071043796,0.0001187914,0.000056704703,0.00005761323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016211993,0.000105822335,0.00012885817,0.00003839931,0.00020959448,0.000089305075,0.00009759424,0.00005892472,0.00048312542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001679762,0.00008369363,0.000041278083,0.000012982432,0.00023697062,0.00048821926,0.000051353018,0.00017069501,0.00046390865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015630872,0.00005092645,0.0015375481,0.000044765777,0.00003388774,0.0000028505008,0.02110671,0.000011222674,0.000008035057,0.9651528,0.0021610307,0.009874602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031335006,0.0001043969,0.0015863519,0.000008750867,0.000017656062,0.0000068877043,0.0012679633,0.000076785975,0.000044477227,0.005226476,0.9912059,0.00014100714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064369735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046303295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98904485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009299456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001662813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59627616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603925014","doi":"","title":"Crossing the Rubicon: Of Sniffer Dogs, Justifications, and Preemptive Deference","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Political science; Psychology; Law; Criminology","score_opus":0.0602817095660839,"score_gpt":0.26273024308975446,"score_spread":0.20244853352367057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603925014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807258,0.009020427,0.00079112465,0.0013060021,0.0002954338,0.00011073856,0.0000074673085,0.000016025175,0.007726963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99048084,0.003154582,0.000025265268,0.000101040074,0.00039245316,0.0000032754294,0.0000017459233,0.000009598157,0.005831218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877673,0.00011110674,0.00023318607,0.000116018025,0.00014165354,0.0006212913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992885,0.00014890065,0.00019207393,0.0001437968,0.00019436001,0.000032397656],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078581774,0.00009954299,0.00015367773,0.000040393315,0.0013280695,0.00009442233,0.00017319969,0.000044066404,0.000038847193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057983434,0.000065013985,0.00006901893,0.000026500107,0.0014538732,0.00015503647,0.00002270475,0.0011123314,0.000007055155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016320882,0.000033499113,0.001284932,0.000009861465,0.00008333101,8.42778e-7,0.029444981,0.0000017678594,0.00015548551,0.9664418,0.00012016941,0.0024069804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068514823,0.0003930174,0.0083480645,0.000061775405,0.00017662467,0.0007113957,0.03467359,0.00003762381,0.00040509825,0.924603,0.02961132,0.00029336425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018220456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019463256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04183885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006754469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094517047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1609079276","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i3.536","title":"Cogency, Compactness and Microstructure","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Relevance (law); Epistemology; Philosophy; Set (abstract data type); Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04873003567549325,"score_gpt":0.2642242689700556,"score_spread":0.21549423329456233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1609079276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56132466,0.0005933271,0.000038764272,0.0009832417,0.00071997166,0.00014013643,0.00004091726,0.00010091194,0.43605804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926145,0.0000299917,0.00008423273,0.0044357385,0.00032597117,0.0000010521234,0.000020069623,0.0000035205476,0.0024849258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994733,0.000013327233,0.00015885374,0.000085015025,0.000075524826,0.00019399913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968404,0.000027361311,0.00006257683,0.00010609371,0.00006740352,0.000052552194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000096374264,0.00010982077,0.00015431659,0.000033744574,0.0002388069,0.0000985967,0.00009456171,0.00006833008,0.00024241922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001347742,0.0000814574,0.00004319474,0.000014640905,0.000330447,0.000249717,0.000019127032,0.00018576362,0.000048763788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019736184,0.000016514135,0.00033221528,0.000026233307,0.000011710696,0.0000054349666,0.017816685,0.0000042768233,0.00015060407,0.9738019,0.0013278174,0.006486887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073844317,0.0005135667,0.029010529,0.000026885022,0.000043698685,0.00007458189,0.0040132497,0.000059700997,0.00037889913,0.150294,0.8143699,0.0004765419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035353285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008657715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8235079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000049333707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017958173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33217365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1630140543","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12218","title":"The Radicalism of Truth‐insensitive Epistemology: Truth's Profound Effect on the Evaluation of Belief","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Rationality; Embodied cognition; Proposition; Philosophy of mind; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.5846625795976647,"score_gpt":0.43469490414118683,"score_spread":0.14996767545647782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1630140543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47047535,0.002328718,0.0000030916694,0.013450539,0.00047908153,0.001003324,0.000037475886,0.000015934604,0.5122065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987929,0.00010717772,0.0000053795834,0.0001397709,0.0005934105,0.000103931314,0.0000081197295,0.0000109711,0.00023832262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931484,0.0046151495,0.00038127668,0.00031655072,0.0011580606,0.00038058314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98496395,0.01317873,0.0001672361,0.00040606188,0.0011738508,0.00011018307],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015717974,0.00016480338,0.00038035034,0.000094405084,0.00073108985,0.00005762877,0.00035852595,0.00014802767,0.000076571254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065447288,0.00007746487,0.000094908035,0.0001159546,0.006607363,0.000056564728,0.00015560308,0.00082528766,0.000027159298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045633435,0.0001405028,0.00002621864,0.00004726657,0.00009573923,0.0000020783968,0.009291681,0.0000027348754,0.000033871074,0.9854948,0.00015306512,0.004255686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074653013,0.0032503444,0.00015316953,0.000040574454,0.000050272836,0.0000022305396,0.0027435394,0.00009264859,0.00023859022,0.9883203,0.004271332,0.00009050336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060873066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015752239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5283176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057773206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014481207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1636038418","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i2.3298","title":"Critical Thinking in Moral Argumentation Contexts: A Virtue Ethical Approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Virtue; Epistemic virtue; Sociology; Criticism; Deliberation; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.09585343320322942,"score_gpt":0.3224022864574426,"score_spread":0.2265488532542132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1636038418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17858149,0.00047561104,0.0017819558,0.0028808257,0.0021102205,0.0003906649,0.000023703697,0.0001768595,0.81357867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902188,0.0000055219034,0.00081684196,0.0076705045,0.0006876768,0.000031134186,0.00003622684,0.000009065781,0.0005241827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880034,0.00011040546,0.00034835062,0.00011028518,0.00022927819,0.00040131487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993973,0.0002458735,0.000063896005,0.00012009752,0.000086946064,0.00008590563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009798183,0.00013706245,0.00021055619,0.000080653575,0.0003023324,0.00012731776,0.00014176428,0.00023618097,0.00017414044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022676705,0.00011165339,0.0000768034,0.00003249004,0.00059441675,0.00091554184,0.000057687015,0.0009036633,0.00015935618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022679462,0.00009880161,0.0019609954,0.000056479235,0.0000084780895,0.0000019304384,0.057558313,0.00000968531,0.0000061641986,0.939579,0.00014901822,0.0005484599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034501138,0.0008964767,0.025318975,0.00019565715,0.00015700494,0.00008940565,0.08814162,0.002397586,0.0002790435,0.72785616,0.14949387,0.0017240848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012536279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011901429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8130545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030741012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003236784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4553093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1642974254","doi":"10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06186.x","title":"Who am I? Beyond “I think, therefore I am”","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Sociology","score_opus":0.25595479912891816,"score_gpt":0.33611576646334124,"score_spread":0.08016096733442307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1642974254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5170083,0.0036023038,0.0000038131725,0.022621943,0.0007383767,0.00023646456,0.000028586515,0.000040245326,0.45571998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97635096,0.00019532393,0.00016725325,0.0044880565,0.00043630344,0.0000015340534,2.3067636e-7,0.000008205499,0.018352132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986304,0.00009844961,0.00034648037,0.00022016736,0.000420676,0.00028383956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999189,0.00011911071,0.00041028578,0.00014204737,0.00007123712,0.00006828352],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011750442,0.00013634974,0.00028807903,0.00007061316,0.00043529537,0.000031818865,0.0012607707,0.00010960092,0.00031153642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006689724,0.000076377095,0.000211628,0.00012214892,0.004257385,0.00029742857,0.00012745257,0.00029754482,0.000019567076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011261613,0.000041597556,0.000525754,0.000029622524,0.000038539256,6.084879e-8,0.074569285,0.0000029426449,0.0001745527,0.8851214,0.03699307,0.0024919307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011155896,0.00019554507,0.0037827247,0.00012936347,0.000033617183,0.0000011136374,0.0083904555,0.0000115791045,0.03186297,0.8525869,0.102733016,0.00016110612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075942435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000119162505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45934266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000023923915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007237418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1644355636","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00504.x","title":"The Bootstrapping Problem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bootstrapping (finance); Allowance (engineering); Computer science; Face (sociological concept); Focus (optics); Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Econometrics; Mathematics; Sociology; Economics; Operations management","score_opus":0.12466450989942629,"score_gpt":0.27951727796171755,"score_spread":0.15485276806229126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1644355636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008301607,0.0016230379,0.00009374219,0.013938854,0.0024400477,0.00023934882,0.0000136803465,0.00015306206,0.9731966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920552,0.000033367705,0.000048336038,0.00084137527,0.0049385736,0.000030739495,0.000006148998,0.000018169652,0.0020281128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902546,0.00009345976,0.00021199838,0.00011954701,0.00016654035,0.00038299826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992386,0.00022620149,0.00009867172,0.00026377308,0.00008642381,0.00008634413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042112614,0.00013476245,0.00015859761,0.000028009821,0.00089555164,0.00012294947,0.0002372192,0.0000375869,0.00007947174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015110584,0.000090191614,0.00011035218,0.000023424067,0.00053506455,0.0002189068,0.000047895024,0.0002754717,0.00030786186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005785366,0.000055178723,0.00012621081,0.00002685572,0.000044500142,3.792082e-7,0.008135093,0.0000010431374,0.000026735728,0.9865751,0.0045304173,0.00047269202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001031764,0.000020098663,0.00013652814,0.000015074049,0.00001925888,0.0000016867217,0.00050637126,0.000010059938,0.000046098183,0.30439234,0.6946315,0.00011776606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040141316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005057445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98375356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017477962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017338245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.688795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1663699010","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2266","title":"How Philosophical is Informal Logic?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Philosophy of logic; Epistemology; Proposition; Mainstream; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08901164352835382,"score_gpt":0.26421813869440863,"score_spread":0.1752064951660548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1663699010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061313204,0.00017854842,0.000029045415,0.012211653,0.0007040046,0.00021164557,0.00007024425,0.00022783577,0.92505383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9018622,0.00013572827,0.00017071716,0.025343986,0.0020549481,0.000022927275,0.00006421842,0.0000183499,0.0703269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984704,0.00003258766,0.00040298878,0.00019635432,0.0003236966,0.00057396985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991629,0.000076526565,0.00012636324,0.00033669794,0.00015086384,0.0001466525],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026613992,0.0002822731,0.00034152888,0.00008538642,0.00048550984,0.00037437736,0.00036810862,0.00023805104,0.0072397464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041041472,0.00021404622,0.00023066968,0.000050075476,0.000858683,0.0012899372,0.00007236096,0.0006078324,0.0020078619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006384501,0.000056459507,0.00009852962,0.000052676598,0.000042739066,0.000015497531,0.014961949,0.000013520699,0.0000032013625,0.9652438,0.003309695,0.016138094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046279468,0.00035981488,0.00033257352,0.000013832946,0.000029116267,0.000024810706,0.0010868909,0.00009517136,0.000053604224,0.08403366,0.913157,0.0003507396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058699516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008299275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9098473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016120257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060524388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1678981692","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511809835.019","title":"Confluence proofs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Confluence; Mathematical proof; Computer science; Mathematics; Programming language; Geometry","score_opus":0.07376159514462419,"score_gpt":0.21819818391125126,"score_spread":0.14443658876662707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1678981692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000080918435,0.00073373003,0.00002809216,0.000030274065,0.0009927903,0.00037226183,0.00040338488,0.00017052701,0.99718803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002841859,0.00009678046,0.000021080947,0.00024084673,0.0010789583,9.49815e-7,0.00005882057,0.000054783915,0.99560595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987699,0.000047163085,0.0001950884,0.00039551093,0.00023305045,0.00035928324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862295,0.00009242696,0.00027365895,0.0005280955,0.00030760161,0.00017524596],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000145336,0.00037990726,0.00046271062,0.00011322922,0.0005196929,0.00010342804,0.00045996963,0.00035598743,0.00007314551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007910359,0.00041827178,0.00026379435,0.0000015036085,0.001857515,0.0001575973,0.00022190486,0.0007485925,0.0001419882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028000648,0.000011509791,8.995295e-7,0.0001554424,0.00015226466,0.00005880139,0.0023408069,1.16506044e-7,0.000008827911,0.9701521,0.026093153,0.0009980808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025403473,0.000041513744,0.0000023776895,0.00012293943,0.00032670004,0.000005811122,0.00019237261,0.0000016574442,0.00007673411,0.00019659533,0.9983082,0.00047108537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002989375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035004654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.972215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009212088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001353231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1682413908","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v45i1.184291","title":"The First Cycle of Study: Teaching and Learning at Cross Purposes?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Higher education; Student engagement; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Pedagogy; Investment (military); Sociology; Public relations; Medical education; Mathematics education; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.05508912867855515,"score_gpt":0.311031780735716,"score_spread":0.2559426520571609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1682413908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781579,0.0031632436,6.0048217e-7,0.002022938,0.0023958874,0.00006345169,0.0000014839771,0.000002134768,0.014192372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9657977,0.0000059845224,0.000016349668,0.00018380425,0.0007484724,0.0000013957496,9.3406646e-7,0.000007816109,0.033237528],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993669,0.00015375593,0.00021241777,0.00005433154,0.00009418454,0.00011843343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905777,0.00012527153,0.0002449329,0.00008055344,0.000306472,0.0001849897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009442406,0.0000558147,0.00010595858,0.00006396747,0.00089872384,0.00014381205,0.00010725188,0.000024557723,0.000046681187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001502159,0.000040687246,0.000030837142,0.000014057273,0.00026560744,0.00015605503,0.000008095961,0.0003459387,0.00000393752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003383949,0.00013452787,0.36329764,0.000048611586,0.00014264631,0.000007903081,0.4790419,0.00010745469,0.000008343173,0.11134754,0.03971903,0.0061105653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016990445,0.00015431555,0.040254463,0.000024192037,0.000029068658,0.0000101628,0.020276366,0.0000012673786,0.0000035634664,0.0035702644,0.9354551,0.000051342766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011667169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10104367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89573604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101052465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006378846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99491423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1693546959","doi":"10.1080/00048402.2013.800126","title":"Cognitive Phenomenology, edited by Tim Bayne and Michelle Montague","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Cognition; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Epistemology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.039703474022320176,"score_gpt":0.25473980634755145,"score_spread":0.21503633232523128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1693546959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79996526,0.0031499104,0.00008198202,0.041682463,0.002667448,0.0005112282,0.00016820684,0.000053491924,0.15172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993432,0.00018132842,0.00013411231,0.0009965115,0.0026034627,0.000005639294,0.000014708328,0.000025138714,0.0026071116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987963,0.00010779758,0.00047238602,0.0001728039,0.00017214572,0.00027859863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987345,0.00015505121,0.0003975879,0.00010835879,0.00040808253,0.0001964505],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021291769,0.00020711402,0.0003935343,0.0001137282,0.00019456646,0.00010303577,0.00017566049,0.00012201852,0.0010342881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004951484,0.00017284801,0.00012365225,0.000036210407,0.00093750726,0.0004919076,0.00003281653,0.00057946524,0.000121485675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003453688,0.0016006376,0.003980964,0.0004410349,0.002793674,0.0002436876,0.11022119,0.0000038528156,0.006789392,0.53804,0.31981897,0.015721204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053865844,0.0035326234,0.0021990093,0.0004834919,0.00069455,0.00036340565,0.021643694,0.000021121694,0.0017353276,0.75618607,0.20667115,0.0010829667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054186752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015661475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21814607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018848585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035205827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1701715910","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01708.x","title":"AN ARCHIMEDEAN POINT FOR PHILOSOPHY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Skepticism; Philosophy; Linguistics; Sociology","score_opus":0.22046507543278415,"score_gpt":0.29212079601589697,"score_spread":0.07165572058311281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1701715910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028524434,0.00049455464,0.0015627864,0.0036449137,0.0032561002,0.0011084978,0.00029530976,0.00051051594,0.9606029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98611563,0.000013839606,0.004295117,0.0039305803,0.0040597925,0.00014225388,0.000085102474,0.00008355513,0.0012741106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982406,0.00015474233,0.00043026442,0.000505418,0.0002285922,0.00044041773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844015,0.00013018181,0.00018044357,0.00070896413,0.0003334949,0.00020675162],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006297746,0.00031877487,0.00046360926,0.00021125743,0.00048670807,0.00007977723,0.00048936973,0.00010427479,0.00076145964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006992978,0.00027534034,0.00038672512,0.000048425092,0.0008230023,0.0004530325,0.000043317417,0.0002837542,0.00021152906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008730489,0.00034518886,0.000049963946,0.00007626078,0.000141699,0.000004991406,0.028680088,3.5018456e-7,0.00013938118,0.96884835,0.0006090324,0.0010173984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000488493,0.0006563792,0.000063207015,0.000016413971,0.00014629557,0.0000029159353,0.0007493586,0.000032580945,0.00090695557,0.91206217,0.084510595,0.00036462743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012050569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001347925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001595856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003775353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1702479143","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2282","title":"Johnson's Manifest Rationality A Pragmatic Theory of Argument","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.049566897329281025,"score_gpt":0.2604724410737302,"score_spread":0.21090554374444917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1702479143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18909496,0.00014639398,0.00006744318,0.00032743567,0.00025280766,0.0001874967,0.000040688818,0.00004772132,0.8098351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97548103,0.00004913428,0.0001516454,0.0015344633,0.00025742262,0.000018092767,0.000041383468,0.0000059097347,0.022460908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916095,0.00007868867,0.00033677943,0.00008399836,0.00017254877,0.00016705025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942404,0.00014865385,0.00012557086,0.00017380949,0.00009208967,0.00003584403],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006081352,0.00010397592,0.00017839711,0.000034622757,0.00015546719,0.00003990221,0.00013428893,0.000051581985,0.008310243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003769429,0.00007896595,0.00009060516,0.000019258718,0.00039652028,0.0002865148,0.00001942874,0.00014010754,0.0003929061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031970107,0.00006931411,0.00007165915,0.00009081651,0.000030276211,0.0000020202624,0.011378323,0.00003918019,0.000005508553,0.9834702,0.0004984065,0.0043123486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005429356,0.0002873707,0.0033619693,0.00004587974,0.000058895905,0.000012419965,0.0027694486,0.0000942334,0.00015153484,0.31119463,0.68122005,0.00026062378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054473356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009897977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78737414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001161575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046610487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99259627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17145050","doi":"10.1023/a:1020832916983","title":"Is there anything wrong with ``God of the gaps'' reasoning?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of religion; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.055926631845081815,"score_gpt":0.28258501510021533,"score_spread":0.22665838325513352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17145050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7351973,0.004895575,0.00053802656,0.045230024,0.006900248,0.0004532842,0.00018607428,0.0000384986,0.20656098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99507475,0.0004139496,0.00026488368,0.0005859269,0.0014347968,0.0000030860324,0.0000022140414,0.000016149163,0.0022042673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990054,0.000038785718,0.00032245956,0.00010452135,0.00042296093,0.00010588445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846935,0.00010184659,0.000527392,0.0001321188,0.000738803,0.000030476545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021698694,0.00010406585,0.00016826269,0.000080305246,0.00019680508,0.00005622384,0.0003853578,0.000048597383,0.00012069278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057839316,0.000064814434,0.00024203763,0.0000224702,0.00030333427,0.00019338822,0.000029496203,0.0002538932,0.000003829911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001246628,0.00012342382,0.0013762476,0.00006176142,0.00035785168,0.0000048271,0.014660018,0.000040547537,0.00015128164,0.97338843,0.008874248,0.00083671336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018545864,0.0007008135,0.00037271163,0.001699253,0.00016479123,0.00019218591,0.00085863564,0.0004294664,0.0050953357,0.7645473,0.22379524,0.00028970707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000074585085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030541254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25987744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029359104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023314706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2643056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1750196828","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12187","title":"Intuitions, Meaning, and Normativity: Why Intuition Theory Supports a Non‐Descriptivist Metaethic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Intuition; Expressivism; Normative; Epistemology; Categorization; Linguistic description; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.4158417246648114,"score_gpt":0.37561754985732937,"score_spread":0.04022417480748203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1750196828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044236682,0.0024781693,0.00051559723,0.010329352,0.00035945934,0.00058941846,0.00007661032,0.00012552897,0.9412892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996635,0.00037564238,0.00010253653,0.0011549025,0.0007615729,0.00009533316,0.000039373368,0.00001884406,0.00081678317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692047,0.0012504678,0.00031609536,0.0004638668,0.00052598416,0.00052309077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980063,0.0008041575,0.00008605212,0.0002766564,0.0004897171,0.00033713237],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050571314,0.00022328758,0.00039029884,0.0002533573,0.0008536295,0.00032047945,0.00020311344,0.00017585425,0.00045525673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057929766,0.00017019983,0.000059105896,0.00011518688,0.003579219,0.0004509294,0.00032722106,0.0012752168,0.00008391783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009313819,0.00015295151,0.00008583309,0.00009268477,0.00006002349,0.000017490014,0.039037142,2.228183e-7,0.000017632972,0.95510894,0.0013616363,0.0039723176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042248337,0.00086661027,0.000041327978,0.000036438512,0.000027664906,0.000011220181,0.009070888,0.000018278148,0.000013941144,0.93909097,0.05019991,0.00020026807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015315542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012457721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9523983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054978413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009036998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1752226307","doi":"10.7202/1044576ar","title":"Le relativisme moral et le projet de coopération épistémique","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.05471432133578694,"score_gpt":0.28404523879794596,"score_spread":0.22933091746215903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1752226307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055027626,0.0041392553,0.030025356,0.06935654,0.002613253,0.0008441441,0.00016103372,0.00030107706,0.83753175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92186546,0.0007059509,0.0036545184,0.0077448715,0.0024313128,0.00006060653,0.0000812055,0.000091197915,0.06336486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996873,0.001369904,0.000456657,0.00043133151,0.00016963108,0.0006994556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845827,0.0002698708,0.00027417552,0.0003761694,0.00044621126,0.00017532981],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019684674,0.0003389208,0.00039728513,0.00009701852,0.0010900124,0.00028555858,0.00026396615,0.0008291849,0.00016996654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024296451,0.00037686308,0.00019766748,0.00008015612,0.0026690504,0.0005060236,0.000078989986,0.0013828047,0.00017058772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006569202,0.00021869426,0.0007043633,0.00022035101,0.00011317133,0.000033107306,0.030438095,0.00004442915,0.00055881747,0.9590695,0.007205916,0.0013278434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066124235,0.00046467365,0.00073887804,0.00025599753,0.00008117949,0.00005760208,0.0044090603,0.0011473149,0.0037488772,0.3546417,0.63328636,0.0005071229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013887958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01764757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86683786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016788412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014939574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1754502781","doi":"","title":"Varela, Francisco J. Ethical Know-How: Action, Wisdom, and Cognition.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Cognition; Psychology; Need to know; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Neuroscience; Computer science","score_opus":0.06150448730298648,"score_gpt":0.28566309333140055,"score_spread":0.2241586060284141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1754502781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6857792,0.17752767,0.062278327,0.048923615,0.009052185,0.00036718734,0.00009279805,0.00005308014,0.015925938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62652606,0.35481817,0.00014998573,0.009146755,0.0032736044,0.0000031061836,0.000004308956,0.00004623085,0.006031811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991568,0.00009686404,0.0002492707,0.00013308527,0.00013672325,0.00022729556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988019,0.00017371186,0.0001675092,0.000090749745,0.00039308274,0.00037308605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005798526,0.0001370969,0.00024041609,0.00016252162,0.0004891654,0.00024290508,0.00008385794,0.00018300411,0.00040530335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000035553246,0.00012049337,0.00006177073,0.00004078198,0.0006261307,0.00015520347,8.156341e-8,0.0007428801,0.0000061738115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004680256,0.00009869783,0.00061687693,0.00016095604,0.0007394586,0.00024359123,0.29535842,0.000022941222,0.0003944402,0.52990746,0.06263522,0.10935389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057258393,0.0001705129,0.000029113335,0.00009129312,0.0000345958,0.00016821927,0.00075228047,0.000015169935,0.000008465558,0.19866577,0.7993684,0.00012360199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004068674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032503795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73673314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000067760957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012582817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1760838892","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1039","title":"Introduction: Deep Disagreement Re-examined","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05390979412536434,"score_gpt":0.260394562558912,"score_spread":0.20648476843354768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1760838892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037849315,0.00026646003,0.00040515338,0.013189134,0.0027706136,0.00023568964,0.000008755738,0.0002216366,0.9450532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630533,0.000033204593,0.00022716416,0.0054244134,0.0053030825,0.00000779077,0.000052483483,0.000005834946,0.02589272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914145,0.000023245748,0.00027756463,0.00013679996,0.00016237305,0.00025854885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948156,0.000028725302,0.000096096395,0.00023460804,0.00010391565,0.00005508371],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023937432,0.00013201105,0.00016572476,0.000050716557,0.00027252405,0.00009342283,0.00014753459,0.000059507634,0.002334901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044027565,0.00010225619,0.00008040753,0.000029336748,0.00023009948,0.000386213,0.000025463169,0.00020189173,0.0005544199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031447144,0.000066120825,0.000035629262,0.000018033475,0.000019737374,0.0000040387727,0.018533755,0.000035907255,0.000019465764,0.9557517,0.011060033,0.014424136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025163498,0.00045888647,0.0013945815,0.000005075535,0.000021973077,0.0000050530275,0.002694502,0.000057793444,0.000098228156,0.019282073,0.9755469,0.0001832782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022918273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016118173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9644869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020298634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016804805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1776105220","doi":"10.1353/hms.2009.a403838","title":"Doxastic Virtues in Hume's Epistemology","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Causation; Essentialism; Philosophy of science","score_opus":0.14331821018823493,"score_gpt":0.3434410694255357,"score_spread":0.20012285923730078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1776105220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49503192,0.032155663,0.000050041337,0.014077791,0.0050451173,0.00062950177,0.000031882428,0.000408441,0.45256963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982965,0.0005801725,0.00007416366,0.0018053667,0.00082845934,0.00001938886,0.000005184565,0.0000132890955,0.013709003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987098,0.00013710675,0.00036224216,0.00029139715,0.00013259135,0.0003668541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991857,0.0002974453,0.00010235539,0.00022534656,0.00015116807,0.00003801174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035778483,0.00021094915,0.0005121773,0.00012899505,0.0003326978,0.000042765376,0.000162723,0.00007089112,0.00012981858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020509414,0.00017558178,0.00010181161,0.000044734657,0.0009433977,0.00013496017,0.000053545915,0.00027805782,0.00018915371],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000262677,0.00014600481,0.0006921709,0.000084739746,0.000120858036,0.000054111693,0.079090394,0.00000616826,0.00007637098,0.9101309,0.0060204286,0.0035515584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011182877,0.00091065426,0.010900358,0.0002063749,0.00013296938,0.000014281506,0.042990774,0.000012537261,0.0001445374,0.62100136,0.32183567,0.0007321657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009123366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002469972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48793304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043047803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024465053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71600175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1779280761","doi":"","title":"A New Middle Ground Between Humanitarian Non-Governmental Organizations and Epistemic Communities? The Cases of the Ottawa Convention and the Convention on Cluster Munitions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Convention; Political science; Epistemic community; Public administration; Public relations; Context (archaeology); Humanitarian aid; State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.027612221698923356,"score_gpt":0.23739127006548175,"score_spread":0.2097790483665584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1779280761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96764183,0.0016075033,0.0009359511,0.017729718,0.0004212972,0.00058380974,0.00004997702,0.000017979206,0.011011949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933226,0.0005945772,0.000005125178,0.00059659744,0.00043780945,0.0000033983858,0.000019970903,0.000013090114,0.0050068432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985101,0.00047352648,0.000321262,0.000082389255,0.00020373761,0.00040895626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988457,0.0004514878,0.00032037697,0.00021949578,0.00013024782,0.00003271741],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011999955,0.00013569435,0.0001894468,0.00004067575,0.0020167264,0.00016711005,0.00024420954,0.000053029155,0.000051100284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054586384,0.000074844844,0.00009041425,0.000057258287,0.0008501409,0.00017727891,0.00004511119,0.0011762615,0.0000027434544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028156897,0.00004100637,0.00039367843,0.000009672976,0.00013149652,2.1248461e-7,0.016449358,0.0000014764368,0.000016050742,0.98220575,0.00017236489,0.000550752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002706778,0.0007706681,0.004982984,0.00017715752,0.0005277494,0.00028299942,0.14570577,0.00004149958,0.00003820448,0.8383631,0.0062176124,0.00018546818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00234922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031533793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14384267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021577707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029561593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1786940742","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00447.x","title":"Belief Ascription and Context Dependence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Ascription; Context (archaeology); Proposition; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.19211245606870664,"score_gpt":0.2563218023199825,"score_spread":0.06420934625127583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1786940742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102810964,0.0017791545,0.00027289017,0.0026635805,0.0022100268,0.00027903318,0.0000392489,0.00019962073,0.8897455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99694324,0.00006419705,0.00011170028,0.0012986808,0.0007875797,0.00001318685,0.000006514223,0.0000139301355,0.00076098606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992441,0.000065788336,0.0001806499,0.00021346431,0.00012502687,0.00017099208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994787,0.00005241064,0.000083051746,0.00019608236,0.00011695243,0.000072788396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016366277,0.00013303227,0.00019929718,0.00005113583,0.00026145572,0.000051331666,0.00013790523,0.000051013838,0.0003150386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016115238,0.000120513956,0.000058440703,0.000015216209,0.00052409724,0.00023369487,0.000046565645,0.0002045658,0.00017571417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018346826,0.00007291152,0.00034028754,0.0000351119,0.000029792413,0.000004604787,0.024407549,4.884641e-8,0.00003948407,0.9724202,0.00069661695,0.0019350135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000413274,0.00017479557,0.0018883253,0.000043346707,0.000049221446,0.000008007441,0.0014305534,0.000037255828,0.00028537642,0.89408386,0.10132406,0.00026191724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047287307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054248015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89413226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013467757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015272823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49144164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1799915287","doi":"10.1002/tht3.100","title":"Basic Knowledge and Contextualist “E = K”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Subject (documents); Identification (biology); Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.06956186225621573,"score_gpt":0.27674724919219484,"score_spread":0.2071853869359791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1799915287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2319887,0.02218191,0.00011288411,0.0149041265,0.0033180872,0.0003209267,0.00002105007,0.00005024641,0.7271021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98894423,0.00020287745,0.0001540473,0.0009414942,0.0047677234,0.0000032414544,0.0000013801556,0.00002056819,0.004964407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904186,0.00012736591,0.00041309273,0.00010590536,0.0001425565,0.00016925237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987412,0.00019423227,0.0003060463,0.00013546672,0.000494516,0.00012850515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038182037,0.0001453022,0.00035165437,0.00011457376,0.00018882388,0.00011785399,0.00017586502,0.000056126217,0.00063242106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060452596,0.00010740743,0.0001417795,0.000029372268,0.00060207583,0.00042291242,0.00003857437,0.00035821303,0.00017075829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022220212,0.00012326318,0.000093982584,0.000091573296,0.00010606722,0.00001119624,0.02231196,1.614914e-7,0.00022255443,0.9552563,0.017607221,0.004153534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008040806,0.00034078828,0.0002092424,0.00014251156,0.00008859865,0.00007401422,0.0014380799,0.0000120848035,0.00014729041,0.59463906,0.40190652,0.00019770786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027065726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003398705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75695556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015369022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046337478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6924567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1831783994","doi":"","title":"Arne Naess and Possibilism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Trumpeter","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mantis; Biology","score_opus":0.027262574236213314,"score_gpt":0.21755593709203352,"score_spread":0.19029336285582021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1831783994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8260751,0.00045448155,0.00000928002,0.0024719916,0.0005142884,0.000085696614,0.000009413455,0.000048470476,0.17033128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95971364,0.000012859045,0.000023314537,0.0010582788,0.0009739812,0.0000058442,0.0000043044633,0.000011300777,0.038196467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947935,0.000056799894,0.00011778018,0.00011910916,0.00007531576,0.00015161789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999614,0.00010081626,0.000040422477,0.00019538736,0.000031159656,0.000018189628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002005185,0.00008633699,0.00011037567,0.000018243309,0.0002541029,0.00009022687,0.000098646284,0.00003232245,0.00025534572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006718782,0.000050716226,0.000046591867,0.000009158663,0.0005820306,0.000074952615,0.00003073229,0.00014023669,0.00008883164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010916938,0.000029512817,0.00029367825,0.000020723352,0.000019141911,0.0000032315836,0.016323375,7.1014244e-7,0.00015801511,0.9777486,0.0037821503,0.0016099884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000517738,0.000091727,0.0076420796,0.000021439757,0.00007248368,0.000012857258,0.0019162457,0.000037866823,0.00048519578,0.43725055,0.55168366,0.00026813624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044006848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011051479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5479015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004775139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007800479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27958566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1850974401","doi":"10.1111/papq.12092","title":"Is Understanding Epistemic in Nature?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Skepticism; Articulation (sociology); Philosophy; Focus (optics); Rationality; Order (exchange); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.1963590482312692,"score_gpt":0.30964752311100197,"score_spread":0.11328847487973276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1850974401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043715514,0.0007597096,0.00025854522,0.091732614,0.0033186125,0.00035150858,0.000064576016,0.00022536,0.85957354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954147,0.000006539748,0.000035123914,0.0012041103,0.0014538798,0.00001719457,0.000014997532,0.000031138763,0.0018223284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809545,0.00018303898,0.00043645783,0.00042604312,0.00038618475,0.0004728162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895436,0.00019539022,0.00011107837,0.00037678765,0.00011272137,0.00024966628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075688044,0.00024571738,0.00039042463,0.00018020111,0.00020435997,0.0001439295,0.00025141926,0.00031314144,0.00016573578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061551604,0.00022093326,0.00014068729,0.00009152974,0.0006439962,0.00027317888,0.000017619908,0.0011093975,0.00030878632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043817294,0.00009775952,0.00015157602,0.000036123,0.000022845483,0.000029745954,0.07097793,4.012262e-7,0.00002053511,0.9262222,0.0022600067,0.00013703291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063885935,0.0003237945,0.00002541788,0.000055303375,0.00001543736,0.000009565998,0.025187474,0.00009047839,0.000009970741,0.958678,0.014688467,0.00027723092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041452873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018040287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9516992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020936567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009428384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9009397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1869766104","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2011.01416.x","title":"HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT ‘HOW DO YOU KNOW?’ CHALLENGES A SPEAKER'S KNOWLEDGE?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Need to know; Psychology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.09897644136040398,"score_gpt":0.27387017781486467,"score_spread":0.17489373645446069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1869766104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014566099,0.07332521,0.00011933842,0.19220272,0.009462404,0.0009445158,0.0002463117,0.0007385977,0.7083948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96517754,0.0010786207,0.000070229384,0.00018993007,0.014176746,0.00011034779,0.000043691627,0.00012696233,0.019025935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99584115,0.0006173962,0.00041197962,0.0009704294,0.0006618733,0.001497157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99686676,0.0004699398,0.0003274844,0.0012269404,0.00037669853,0.0007321872],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012654486,0.00081217784,0.0010236279,0.00026194614,0.0008607547,0.00086927944,0.00067122263,0.0005497951,0.00042846907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011094416,0.0006820343,0.0005903002,0.00010587046,0.0016047495,0.0011884292,0.00008246361,0.0013454476,0.0010267516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058073434,0.0008047586,0.00009283974,0.0002755822,0.00021568642,0.000018209192,0.12416675,4.947856e-8,0.00007043329,0.83066404,0.0039604027,0.03967315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069292774,0.00075491215,0.000114080656,0.00015406197,0.00014794256,0.000029965599,0.038545273,0.000012275518,0.00004139291,0.26733825,0.69134015,0.00082878885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008229771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010937935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9506114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009542533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008131579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1876167642","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2015.24238","title":"Knowing is not Enough","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Nursing; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.43147896142138664,"score_gpt":0.341432849274697,"score_spread":0.09004611214668962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1876167642","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000118749485,0.002171898,0.000008309416,0.0067615975,0.78897625,0.00015486075,0.00016269238,0.00019639019,0.2015561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016850915,0.000024840425,0.00006674543,0.0011100745,0.8395157,0.000011008491,0.00029885554,0.00012621692,0.15716146],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968522,0.00024598054,0.00044730946,0.00064184744,0.0010427315,0.0007699174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997357,0.0008683688,0.00029648055,0.0005859189,0.00071495917,0.00017723328],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009539117,0.00050676183,0.00074982026,0.00017487198,0.00048685682,0.0003974989,0.00052493665,0.0012314607,0.00037219893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006845053,0.00050782587,0.00031782806,0.000043757667,0.0014460491,0.00024851883,0.000024142098,0.0024730929,0.00074930117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037032194,0.00006893043,1.6630617e-7,0.0002712227,0.00006961541,0.000007506844,0.17448054,3.005141e-7,0.0000035120736,0.0133179035,0.80840844,0.0033348294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038773663,0.00013085199,2.483522e-7,0.0011408073,0.0002499126,0.0000010402268,0.026690183,0.0000035979556,0.000045095003,0.007032148,0.9637581,0.0005602754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022141052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017716612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15534966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033251243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000644371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1881342488","doi":"","title":"Building an Island of Rationality around the Concept ofDifferentiation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Sociology; Geography; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.048073449111700466,"score_gpt":0.2964235119549421,"score_spread":0.24835006284324163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1881342488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9673735,0.0017598674,0.00015798987,0.021057747,0.00552607,0.00046964543,0.0003637359,0.000008402494,0.0032830746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99631715,0.000013830216,0.00004322495,0.0002537397,0.0015585534,0.0000044530834,0.000007122422,0.00000568081,0.0017962393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989417,0.00018217653,0.00040650126,0.000060430255,0.00026833132,0.00014084062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703944,0.00030524563,0.0011557835,0.000082962295,0.0013855828,0.00003098788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001053342,0.00007900078,0.0002211336,0.000053341137,0.00086838467,0.000083033985,0.0001666913,0.000047283174,0.000010245334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005315605,0.00004490648,0.00019241316,0.00004196633,0.00017353638,0.00018934491,0.000010929146,0.00015499258,4.165125e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004728194,0.000060649993,0.040651232,0.000027175243,0.0005004563,2.2363047e-7,0.015271495,0.00030928318,0.0000343318,0.8905217,0.052538656,0.00008003962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018331605,0.00028026704,0.10327448,0.00016148304,0.0011283149,0.0000058000023,0.035472505,0.00039959516,0.00038611022,0.52847195,0.3281903,0.0003960508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015785461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6688693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65308386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047651675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018600524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1894958704","doi":"10.1007/s11406-015-9655-x","title":"Understanding and the Norm of Explanation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of mind; Introspection; Philosophy of language; Epistemology; Norm (philosophy); Speech act; Psychology; Metaphysics; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.5850479768524158,"score_gpt":0.2990073746570184,"score_spread":0.28604060219539745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1894958704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05577288,0.0012961,0.0005644983,0.04013014,0.001379509,0.0002905449,0.000023106562,0.000056001394,0.90048724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877906,0.000026407122,0.000018047473,0.00033913946,0.0005314873,0.0000032837213,0.0000039052393,0.000005119036,0.0002935633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996074,0.000047424943,0.0001119811,0.00006485681,0.000106787644,0.00006153572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960965,0.00013494148,0.000070284914,0.0000910714,0.0000676976,0.000026345759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039570927,0.00004995988,0.00010950752,0.000029114759,0.000102995546,0.00002390903,0.00005697238,0.000021518292,0.000019452826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058360773,0.000031794996,0.00002662856,0.0000124820035,0.00064661127,0.00008936081,0.00001933545,0.0000747573,0.0000072971507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027802107,0.000008441715,0.00006705037,0.000014281702,0.000016847285,3.707125e-7,0.02184839,0.0000012722102,0.0000030745014,0.9773665,0.0006151243,0.000030819963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006578764,0.000030605388,0.000016987931,0.000009109299,0.000025114305,0.0000011075052,0.0047682654,0.0000695304,0.00002376774,0.9866564,0.007696513,0.000044681423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000091580565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017483134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94300616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001571866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016118718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23824662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1896317508","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00625.x","title":"Précis of <i>Knowledge in an Uncertain World</i>","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Adventure; Politics; Sociology; Library science; Art history; Law; Computer science; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.5146541832854877,"score_gpt":0.45284365521136877,"score_spread":0.061810528074118964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1896317508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12100649,0.113706686,0.000003882149,0.007334531,0.00079573167,0.000425466,0.00010992015,0.000022804394,0.7565945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814969,0.0023998453,0.000119544195,0.00018985318,0.0028896246,0.000055519125,0.00001934523,0.000025215153,0.012804156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953699,0.0019666264,0.0005652749,0.00045455812,0.00040756434,0.0012360355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968169,0.0018700121,0.000103169914,0.00039815815,0.00038626548,0.00042554075],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044608926,0.00027368614,0.0006101008,0.00046806582,0.0005154385,0.000077773904,0.000410217,0.0003134305,0.0010871929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025293496,0.00023231885,0.00009925279,0.00041131547,0.0058632833,0.00049695227,0.000327842,0.001496959,0.000117857395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016212475,0.0022333586,0.004082669,0.0006193861,0.0000412852,0.000008555952,0.033521637,0.0000017941934,0.000026105843,0.9524103,0.00037464028,0.0065181544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046465467,0.0009780006,0.00076558924,0.00016222098,0.000019788982,0.0000021796645,0.0033347937,0.000030621733,0.00001776186,0.76601094,0.22797386,0.00023958588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048755237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080711447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8604904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108556174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010766017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189894983","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-5934-3_1","title":"Virtue, Intuition, and Philosophical Methodology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Virtue; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.21333593330484107,"score_gpt":0.3023210647752008,"score_spread":0.08898513147035975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189894983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012924986,0.0007489599,0.0006545556,0.0043847235,0.0010804202,0.00020820819,0.000041120526,0.00010378826,0.9927653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025923585,0.00043710356,0.0010862623,0.0043987157,0.0032371373,0.000016355474,0.00006928754,0.000062177605,0.9881006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988294,0.000094105046,0.000360589,0.000392221,0.00014069681,0.00018295209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865335,0.00055126986,0.00016316035,0.00028971818,0.00024128058,0.00010120792],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003766462,0.00031746097,0.00059574586,0.00011803135,0.00020891991,0.000084951156,0.00013806314,0.0005270066,0.018290905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054967495,0.00025656165,0.00014746655,0.0000027714416,0.0016999386,0.00010491156,0.0001025974,0.0007544685,0.0011984787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056042004,0.000009047947,3.4876047e-7,0.00006416323,0.000110057896,0.000004934577,0.0013241492,2.4277776e-8,0.0000041261956,0.9841471,0.01203762,0.0022928403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007267728,0.000067155175,7.015689e-7,0.000020130403,0.000060284878,0.0000067085025,0.000052181786,0.000001300858,0.000002745496,0.5412925,0.45825526,0.00016832318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010657164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034496657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44621766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015443284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003765137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1908302690","doi":"10.1111/rati.12097","title":"Epistemic Value Monism and the Swamping Problem","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Epistemology; Premise; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08529585516567487,"score_gpt":0.26259036325555307,"score_spread":0.1772945080898782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1908302690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13348024,0.004657251,0.001531052,0.03399073,0.0021849652,0.0009797852,0.000016520975,0.000205207,0.82295424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776903,0.000040048697,0.00019024014,0.0011717404,0.0007249341,0.000025830124,0.00000535576,0.000011091487,0.020140495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939847,0.00012838349,0.00014625012,0.000110040564,0.00010201539,0.00011484462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995316,0.00013299655,0.00006447024,0.0001405166,0.00008956252,0.00004080044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006456402,0.00007597123,0.00013476454,0.000015943458,0.00026422937,0.00013810727,0.00007956716,0.000034711546,0.000016873299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051952782,0.00004751675,0.000034934776,0.000011020084,0.0005748248,0.00012053598,0.000029112658,0.00014420929,0.000047282407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000930428,0.0000068262493,0.000031588814,0.000018678205,0.000015996982,6.943896e-7,0.066095054,0.0000114392515,0.00001716787,0.9316687,0.0018106694,0.0003138591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013193977,0.000058885133,0.0000344038,0.00003726912,0.000055887733,0.00000894735,0.010572619,0.0009168134,0.00013227559,0.68569833,0.30099532,0.00016986128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034045035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003621075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013146034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052424482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2117966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910537218","doi":"10.1111/meta.12107","title":"You Make Your Own Luck","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Luck; Counterfactual thinking; Causation; Epistemology; Positive economics; Metaphysics; Psychology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.08191204937160894,"score_gpt":0.26948065994830483,"score_spread":0.18756861057669588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1910537218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04371581,0.00067049224,0.0002448597,0.0074391193,0.0035827728,0.00023314556,0.00005010524,0.0002936856,0.94377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641565,0.000028312388,0.00035172046,0.004216056,0.005322359,0.000026575584,0.000035361478,0.000054032458,0.025809098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983832,0.00020327826,0.00035555978,0.00038737667,0.00029679827,0.0003737587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881214,0.00013070481,0.00015722077,0.00059959386,0.00017501901,0.0001253083],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064286764,0.00026831677,0.00044201475,0.00014169859,0.00041195445,0.00014298699,0.00034196963,0.00011275743,0.0007982275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012121294,0.00022154524,0.00029321635,0.00005551262,0.0005983747,0.00015595577,0.00007224984,0.00037515725,0.0012171913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011464884,0.00008524697,0.0001081379,0.000048148446,0.00009471064,0.000003582335,0.0064841267,0.0000021226683,0.00008061265,0.9875326,0.0020235884,0.0035256657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026467285,0.0000948449,0.00009387049,0.000010627492,0.0000890562,0.000002344943,0.0002918039,0.00003118481,0.00013748153,0.33248362,0.66627395,0.00022650848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000105751635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016873474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9204407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015155688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002246511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1920291627","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511732270.003","title":"Could integrity be an epistemic virtue?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Content (measure theory); Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09334157844013001,"score_gpt":0.23796208287209866,"score_spread":0.14462050443196867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1920291627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000536442,0.00016867254,0.000053884552,0.00015936185,0.0012793373,0.0005166281,0.0009196773,0.0002671977,0.9960988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005075407,0.00010139367,0.000041410985,0.0006179854,0.00095816114,0.0000019426043,0.00024870556,0.00008545388,0.99286956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814934,0.00012750935,0.00032141196,0.0006914291,0.00033142982,0.00037890827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774176,0.00014631628,0.00038611123,0.00090083294,0.00054722227,0.00027773838],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023236488,0.0005710246,0.0007286176,0.00018146692,0.0005845744,0.00018196562,0.0007878893,0.0007379829,0.0001617885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001448555,0.0006188898,0.00037957588,0.0000027283477,0.001860113,0.00030535675,0.0002908301,0.0018912645,0.00014919836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039119353,0.000024106324,6.2813285e-7,0.0001601406,0.00018628944,0.00008253348,0.0015619408,2.0582121e-7,0.000017472994,0.9319426,0.065497465,0.00048752752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038845235,0.00013741627,0.0000024655699,0.00016234624,0.0003454248,0.000008907367,0.0008712656,0.000022814826,0.00004898626,0.0010224993,0.99630404,0.00068539125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025812823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029397776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93092006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002009863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001848767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1921503942","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00469.x","title":"Can We Be Self‐Deceived about What We Believe? Self‐Knowledge, Self‐Deception, and Rational Agency","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Self-deception; Order (exchange); Relation (database); Self-knowledge; Epistemology; Content (measure theory); Social psychology; Psychology; Self; Common knowledge (logic); Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09298263487289923,"score_gpt":0.2563550489335183,"score_spread":0.16337241406061906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1921503942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27443188,0.03421409,0.00018392786,0.032466628,0.010984112,0.0007184325,0.00011363596,0.00047089276,0.6464164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97382444,0.013273671,0.002356542,0.0013513389,0.007191351,0.0000026770035,0.000012259712,0.00009700079,0.0018907291],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730456,0.00085054594,0.00087530015,0.00029837177,0.0003559353,0.00031526317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776673,0.0001252004,0.0006921236,0.0002713467,0.00085663155,0.0002879596],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012202824,0.00033886987,0.00044699624,0.00024678608,0.0005678246,0.00026741362,0.00041842335,0.000061991515,0.000670319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044232518,0.0002884587,0.00025580428,0.000070405324,0.00039678122,0.00094876013,0.000091916074,0.0006556866,0.00016919358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009381832,0.0011290275,0.0002340665,0.00028733592,0.0007498895,0.0002099903,0.5816098,0.0000019179906,0.00020936402,0.4015,0.009154275,0.004820536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028164797,0.0016552496,0.0046068695,0.0007922623,0.00061249005,0.0002521679,0.005309438,0.000022870165,0.0002079732,0.24379864,0.7390032,0.0009223865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000046877512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040728042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7298489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005129007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016381955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924137967","doi":"10.1111/nous.12017","title":"Knowledge, Stakes, and Mistakes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Noûs","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.0880633502216077,"score_gpt":0.26448848871069974,"score_spread":0.17642513848909203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924137967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20030044,0.0023263646,0.000013582925,0.0009579166,0.00072406494,0.00013987115,0.000012368826,0.00007634778,0.795449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89164925,0.000035933183,0.000101476864,0.00046644767,0.00072988885,0.000017786424,0.00000707063,0.00001401519,0.10697811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951154,0.00003378752,0.00011156788,0.00013329541,0.000055227767,0.00015456731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995644,0.00008974911,0.000033756678,0.00013630032,0.00011902628,0.000056777037],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000094968025,0.00008709849,0.00012477198,0.00002752595,0.0001838531,0.00012074994,0.000068518944,0.00004428545,0.0014027453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002654492,0.00007067159,0.00003341134,0.00001035026,0.0003692252,0.00013332715,0.0000123870395,0.0001241026,0.00063495076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031554296,0.000091205424,0.0004292344,0.00011031631,0.0000386753,0.0000017188962,0.07244741,1.4209331e-7,0.00023106139,0.8390833,0.06981396,0.01774978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016142844,0.00004503377,0.00084905984,0.00001389578,0.0000148353865,0.0000013148315,0.004852746,0.000022884873,0.00010556776,0.02150763,0.97229934,0.00012625415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051576697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001348713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9024854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007486939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022132865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19262010","doi":"10.1007/978-94-010-0013-0_13","title":"The Dialectical Illusion of a Vicious Bootstrap","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Coherentism; Appeal; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Dialectic; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Philosophy; Illusion; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09554469878600108,"score_gpt":0.2689426364004918,"score_spread":0.17339793761449074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W19262010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000024009212,0.0009743473,0.000030579464,0.0008766225,0.0016958697,0.00017340577,0.00001975243,0.000033593533,0.99617183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004734714,0.00067100505,0.00002175119,0.00090532925,0.0007452561,0.0000037246518,0.000008821739,0.00003791561,0.99287146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900556,0.00003773362,0.0003506492,0.00019371069,0.00022784703,0.00018451315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884343,0.00039990788,0.00017717568,0.0003254044,0.00020881441,0.000045236444],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027628397,0.00021444864,0.00034643983,0.00004195774,0.00038740886,0.00005041944,0.00016830886,0.00023749692,0.0023667275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038131824,0.00012978005,0.00025133695,0.000003619956,0.0014979007,0.000028624592,0.000041971958,0.00048699393,0.00015369256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009602311,0.000013727294,2.879397e-7,0.000037469243,0.00007486172,0.000003403058,0.0023976003,7.74191e-8,0.0000047189633,0.986024,0.010085005,0.001349247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007097266,0.00008148202,5.817098e-7,0.000029643743,0.00006486281,0.0000018861006,0.00018907896,9.2689294e-7,0.000015015741,0.25903884,0.7403826,0.00012406411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006881122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015687465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7302976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018508472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066921275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1937457939","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i2.2578","title":"Reasoning Under Uncertainty: The Role of Two Informal Fallacies in an Emerging Scientific Inquiry","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Epistemology; Heuristics; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Function (biology); Argumentation theory; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.12100827948780749,"score_gpt":0.30743743939493345,"score_spread":0.18642915990712597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1937457939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86104894,0.00044946914,0.000020015852,0.00016138106,0.0007522178,0.0001379332,0.000008708059,0.00005078811,0.13737054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714506,0.000019675032,0.000055646135,0.00060159265,0.0002836147,0.000011431892,0.000019263256,0.0000085005595,0.001855243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867487,0.000061485756,0.0004568861,0.0001396775,0.00026699557,0.00040010473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991714,0.000101659294,0.00019830334,0.00031011718,0.00016831391,0.00005023543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078314764,0.00015696936,0.00021641144,0.0001699773,0.0005459771,0.00025420904,0.0003563881,0.000066781184,0.00041390627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000544166,0.00010717394,0.000088625304,0.00011751813,0.0014409162,0.0011525067,0.000110233035,0.0003496868,0.000063908374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013665153,0.000043818618,0.0021627778,0.00002525017,0.000015659876,0.0000013929422,0.2151704,0.005217555,0.0000615984,0.77052736,0.00007626033,0.00668423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018072935,0.0006285578,0.0048753954,0.00018495253,0.00007734901,0.000022616794,0.45515972,0.054608636,0.000635619,0.08247312,0.39852762,0.0009991003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040775136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042408635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68805426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001967915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004062094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53091156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963816739","doi":"10.1002/bies.201200182","title":"When peers are not peers and don't know it: The Dunning‐Kruger effect and self‐fulfilling prophecy in peer‐review","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BioEssays","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Subconscious; Objectivity (philosophy); Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Medicine","score_opus":0.04089134716365799,"score_gpt":0.2649940997960596,"score_spread":0.2241027526324016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963816739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6591138,0.09616186,0.000026128013,0.16424121,0.0023447676,0.0048301164,0.00010009694,0.0003642104,0.07281779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96726626,0.007928916,0.00019638217,0.005977833,0.0007049413,0.0002493272,0.000023208486,0.000058507336,0.017594624],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983604,0.00027956883,0.0003257998,0.00035275004,0.00034106936,0.00034038973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986824,0.00046896108,0.00017301626,0.00028322265,0.00030197698,0.0000904378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016444246,0.0002650649,0.0004639511,0.00006678749,0.0003724479,0.00026011863,0.00019037919,0.000107503765,0.0002600232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032914573,0.00016389374,0.00010703455,0.000042388052,0.0005991673,0.00024518324,0.00009216561,0.00041490028,0.00006253778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009782648,0.000654105,0.037394684,0.029775187,0.00075819273,0.000091061884,0.30279505,0.000008893584,0.0006419453,0.20262212,0.38420036,0.040960573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011938501,0.00033226883,0.0048599048,0.003413104,0.00037688427,0.000021080801,0.011311597,0.00020121041,0.00016842288,0.005255269,0.97206134,0.00080505805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069048983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007525684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.587861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023913475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031960088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66833925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966971714","doi":"10.1177/0191453706059845","title":"On the public use of practical reason","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Legitimacy; Epistemology; Public reason; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Variety (cybernetics); Cornerstone; Deliberation; Generalizability theory; Politics; Deliberative democracy; Law and economics; Democracy; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.24450179181631218,"score_gpt":0.3236907243889362,"score_spread":0.07918893257262402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966971714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12367663,0.00016000564,0.000063863234,0.2602989,0.0014063665,0.00034151532,0.00015932905,0.00012575962,0.6137676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99115103,0.0000057021343,0.000042702115,0.0036898397,0.0036398782,0.000019420295,0.000015467915,0.000024531526,0.0014114113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867123,0.00026492286,0.00028316161,0.0001843889,0.00033048188,0.00026580846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979631,0.0013453969,0.0001194205,0.00020764166,0.0003268515,0.000037618534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032449226,0.00014677644,0.0002431373,0.000046458077,0.00063206826,0.00015725473,0.00013716685,0.00010006539,0.00030010805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005493511,0.00010918935,0.00020350033,0.00004145708,0.0013591466,0.00028310207,0.000035122834,0.00040116187,0.000073907766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015294474,0.00025895948,0.00001417528,0.00002985489,0.000027976386,0.000006469605,0.0032920092,8.875014e-8,0.00003224662,0.9797559,0.016483083,0.000083972154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012508118,0.000068254914,0.00010166452,0.000014396141,0.000046117344,0.0000013994429,0.0004682497,0.000004582002,0.000074385876,0.8434821,0.15549845,0.00011532232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002479624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020208489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86747444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024760795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056811794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5007832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967032030","doi":"10.3138/tjt.1993","title":"Theology and Rationality: Some Conceptual and Epistemic Remarks","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Virtue; Duty; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Principal (computer security); Sociology; Expression (computer science); Philosophy; Computer science; Theology; Economics","score_opus":0.03349980824642458,"score_gpt":0.2610466418696843,"score_spread":0.22754683362325973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967032030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7647479,0.042779908,0.0003621276,0.017061975,0.0033826567,0.00035291334,0.000016208858,0.000032224492,0.17126404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893689,0.0009755854,0.00023268873,0.0018274218,0.0011847721,0.0000043534383,0.0000022461352,0.0000111594045,0.006392878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875695,0.00039174198,0.00042299717,0.00013385496,0.00009581154,0.00019867666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985647,0.0005828229,0.000359977,0.00011954567,0.0002792484,0.0000936677],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006750836,0.00013116696,0.0004123468,0.00003442288,0.00015941769,0.00004027524,0.00013919771,0.00012468483,0.0026449251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013775463,0.00009721834,0.00006838926,0.0000044416656,0.0024491446,0.00053149275,0.00006298001,0.00024952667,0.000014401711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042875396,0.000024789591,0.00055952254,0.00001650656,0.000106582134,0.000006043133,0.01540499,5.21451e-7,0.00022285894,0.9804896,0.0017116894,0.0014139992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008151411,0.0005349959,0.0021345655,0.000021474338,0.00007908315,0.00037456417,0.006441707,0.00002111202,0.000030232513,0.9633308,0.026066078,0.00015026954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072711514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011973623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22462095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033214383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055174445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969509720","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v1i1.2972","title":"Experts, Evidence, and Epistemic Independence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Western Washington University; University of Washington","keywords":"Epistemology; Intellect; Autonomy; Proposition; Rationality; Empirical evidence; Irrational number; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12328303810701075,"score_gpt":0.29683321272867147,"score_spread":0.17355017462166072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969509720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8056918,0.13103005,0.0074267844,0.009530507,0.016864017,0.001013966,0.00004312687,0.000050773368,0.028349012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938421,0.0006731673,0.00056593923,0.00044032998,0.00091057684,0.0000050629533,3.8509336e-7,0.0000064262294,0.0035559952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899274,0.000035285404,0.00030108693,0.0001824768,0.0002929646,0.00019547227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985976,0.00052894704,0.00020239149,0.00015946732,0.00040325843,0.000108287735],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025710203,0.00010331551,0.00014612466,0.00015462606,0.0023923914,0.00007767943,0.00027081984,0.000040388775,0.00004277893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018753212,0.0000720602,0.00005880353,0.000045158347,0.0051544993,0.00040631305,0.000031073687,0.00020472103,7.9049755e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007992141,0.000034260735,0.000023975843,0.000041360378,0.000016968772,0.000032632746,0.040427256,0.000017805178,0.008512692,0.9474561,0.0007421941,0.0026148243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000743291,0.001346031,0.0001760398,0.00041504524,0.00024087814,0.010900448,0.012768234,0.0010030898,0.0013093262,0.55329937,0.41710067,0.00069757254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044975444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003839058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41635847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101191494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023934584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969780184","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2929.2007.02724.x","title":"Effect size enhancement on McLeod's test of tacit knowledge","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Medical Education","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Citation; Library science; Test (biology); Visitor pattern; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.026034046117666913,"score_gpt":0.33005500905447127,"score_spread":0.30402096293680436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969780184","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005399097,0.0012990243,0.00004548105,0.5434216,0.019483676,0.00076875754,0.000037321897,0.00007831133,0.42946666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019882882,0.000108616965,0.000032950433,0.7943428,0.03387863,0.00013958964,0.0004783896,0.00006246465,0.15107368],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980192,0.0002457465,0.00046061925,0.00032311532,0.00065378816,0.0002974981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99573153,0.0033116343,0.00025956603,0.00035621884,0.00026309953,0.00007793778],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011903167,0.00026177708,0.00045966942,0.00012567145,0.00012370132,0.000031424417,0.0002904726,0.0006500679,0.004809471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003159598,0.00020925842,0.00016706796,0.000041259576,0.0006966371,0.000041670522,0.000029330624,0.0016799169,0.00046826308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000085882,0.000534415,0.000013212158,0.0010240389,0.000038226397,0.000004583974,0.0056370767,7.895726e-9,0.000008909802,0.0037250808,0.9610001,0.028005775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018907555,0.0006174729,0.000020351421,0.0006403352,0.00009128212,0.0000014264342,0.00012648161,0.0000018652069,0.0005902294,0.00060175767,0.99692994,0.00018976569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015203914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001239514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.278393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010314927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091149035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99610025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971338664","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.00004.x","title":"An Introduction to Philosophical Methods. By ChrisDaly. (Toronto: Broadview, 2010. Pp. 257. US$32.95.)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Media studies; Art history; Library science; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.07592193641619185,"score_gpt":0.3191050254458789,"score_spread":0.24318308902968702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971338664","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079357736,0.010312462,0.0054593566,0.7699593,0.019600844,0.003636873,0.00042992752,0.0018259869,0.10941753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9603691,0.00017146723,0.0027239663,0.0086591,0.02580586,0.00019390295,0.00010170185,0.00015272193,0.00182216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954038,0.0013750596,0.0008653113,0.0010198475,0.0005387216,0.00079725246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971398,0.00028169074,0.00026551096,0.0014266883,0.00035183303,0.0005344661],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019534077,0.00059317576,0.0007856745,0.000055565724,0.0008355208,0.00020674305,0.0011270948,0.00035295534,0.0035035664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109427136,0.00042894896,0.00035053556,0.000109155226,0.0014427303,0.0007779721,0.000070358656,0.0011528647,0.00078118534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026373874,0.00080701854,0.000010955551,0.0000452441,0.00017670037,0.0000058025566,0.04892595,9.06885e-7,0.0024632423,0.90685165,0.025660686,0.014788098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046530936,0.0026706823,0.00017308955,0.000018243742,0.00020594324,0.00001844473,0.0012464133,0.000071253955,0.00029204314,0.7523632,0.24184002,0.0006353417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002236865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007396166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88101137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009881109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004831659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973116765","doi":"10.1162/posc_a_00127","title":"On the Origins of the Philosophy of Thought Experiments: The Forerun","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Parallels; Epistemology; Period (music); Subject (documents); Philosophy; Philosophy of history; Order (exchange); Thought experiment; Aesthetics; Computer science; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.08000198462229284,"score_gpt":0.3050809371873372,"score_spread":0.22507895256504434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973116765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64833456,0.0002198183,0.000009664531,0.010490094,0.00057104,0.00037698707,0.000011017242,0.000011898368,0.33997488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976184,0.00001997535,0.000017612418,0.0008482172,0.0001982747,0.000027015622,7.186996e-8,0.0000056692616,0.0012647742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989058,0.00010106625,0.00014596678,0.00021563981,0.00046205748,0.00016948063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849296,0.00042665706,0.00016087758,0.00058055477,0.00031639004,0.000022551461],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005625603,0.00009885798,0.00012295264,0.000043059663,0.00072090275,0.00006923506,0.00089764566,0.000018277682,0.0002657959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025862627,0.000038115904,0.00010873421,0.00014180642,0.0070452574,0.00017958552,0.000083228464,0.0001964643,0.000034867113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043989426,0.00008241134,0.000028043441,0.0000031222528,0.000009487803,3.1934164e-8,0.11213776,0.000003865558,0.0011762417,0.8862345,0.00026572446,0.000054382777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026943942,0.000459382,0.0031359745,0.00010816859,0.000025140318,8.66895e-7,0.30298957,0.00012258906,0.040614773,0.63417405,0.017886681,0.00021335714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031904285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032005664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3492838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006241117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007620645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975946204","doi":"10.1007/s11229-010-9773-8","title":"Is knowledge justified true belief?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Point (geometry); Philosophy of mind; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07907218540409477,"score_gpt":0.30288243207220483,"score_spread":0.22381024666811006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975946204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22913764,0.0002486039,0.00001430342,0.0020414747,0.0049264235,0.00014438742,0.000074205345,0.00015016817,0.7632628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91455317,0.000016326256,0.00009290379,0.00060135033,0.0020999848,0.000017888717,0.000006529112,0.000026797265,0.08258503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917066,0.000053405845,0.00018622798,0.00022927491,0.00010410385,0.0002563109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999014,0.0002870395,0.000062043924,0.00041429995,0.00013755912,0.00008501585],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033876076,0.00014726465,0.00020695217,0.000061993545,0.0002961717,0.00008515677,0.00023077163,0.00012054965,0.004077766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001855496,0.000121685036,0.00012616997,0.00002362838,0.00062202185,0.00011546492,0.000046764075,0.00046836067,0.0020078912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010565295,0.00016189953,0.00007173576,0.000080039834,0.00004969048,0.0000043115883,0.07189951,7.1565864e-8,0.0038521287,0.8933037,0.019746926,0.010819432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012636141,0.000027978602,0.00009352833,0.000019096944,0.00004319898,0.0000024866445,0.0023733368,0.00002216545,0.003620445,0.020516811,0.9729649,0.00018971726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019912067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034130802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9532179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000075423527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056858476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976545681","doi":"10.1017/epi.2014.14","title":"EPISTEMIC CIRCULARITY, RELIABILISM, AND TRANSMISSION FAILURE","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Legitimacy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.025876716604097065,"score_gpt":0.22793908531024548,"score_spread":0.2020623687061484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976545681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42217967,0.0033009178,0.007077706,0.054353245,0.0034980602,0.0011517083,0.000060068385,0.00084747927,0.5075311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98699576,0.000055748347,0.00043906228,0.0009258657,0.00084292865,0.000017155393,0.000022587274,0.000036971946,0.010663938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998465,0.00025290408,0.00035931697,0.00039241294,0.00022060807,0.00030977224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989951,0.00024000938,0.00011494766,0.00038080206,0.000121864075,0.00014727797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082353095,0.00022012804,0.0003666093,0.00006818184,0.00043734864,0.00013598398,0.0001894731,0.00015343218,0.00037509136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008015427,0.00018939075,0.0001337269,0.000030994503,0.0007240286,0.0001900874,0.000045198147,0.0003647856,0.000113360686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011445068,0.00006099915,0.00054487423,0.00047200252,0.000034433702,0.000004650879,0.014591423,0.0000021364183,0.0010236842,0.9713561,0.0041898894,0.007708371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004666003,0.00011276056,0.0004421912,0.00011239106,0.000054650747,0.000013577739,0.00082580425,0.00019751553,0.00016882966,0.09779445,0.89950246,0.00030878177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019537391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003419578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89531255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024939329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029918934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77231306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977467634","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2013.05.009","title":"Taking ‘know’ for an answer: A reply to Nagel, San Juan, and Mar","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Humanities; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09762473502353419,"score_gpt":0.30004801333688175,"score_spread":0.20242327831334755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977467634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83449095,0.00035409545,0.0020455571,0.0032343043,0.001364483,0.0016507726,0.00012973342,0.00023379333,0.1564963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896752,0.000019270548,0.0007478286,0.0055603688,0.0010021105,0.00016840574,0.00009528076,0.000021052929,0.002710436],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993701,0.000040917876,0.00014364354,0.00021133573,0.000066508066,0.00016751834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937284,0.000090874324,0.00007862203,0.00012603904,0.00025725848,0.000074382064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018527059,0.00009579415,0.00012793484,0.000055275726,0.00029718297,0.00017340822,0.000052863987,0.000043646753,0.00039354956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098639444,0.000090865375,0.00003808964,0.000016609189,0.00013561116,0.0003271043,0.00001843832,0.000083445295,0.000097144126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016739238,0.0005007458,0.0003164208,0.0006466829,0.00016045198,0.000005106534,0.11119973,0.0000016762579,0.011537074,0.3350241,0.11984236,0.42059827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089793454,0.001187249,0.0020451983,0.00017434034,0.00014905765,0.000006082799,0.011081563,0.00026911162,0.0023531974,0.16109116,0.82024306,0.0005020443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018261571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075032347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7004007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007930964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011526005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43090916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982432424","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9224-9","title":"Character and Knowledge: Learning from the Speech of Experts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Pathos; Ethos; Character (mathematics); Logos Bible Software; Epistemology; Psychology; Social knowledge; Sociology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13704088616481985,"score_gpt":0.2752474300216571,"score_spread":0.13820654385683723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982432424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96175545,0.000261078,0.000023535085,0.00012016263,0.00035659625,0.0000698439,0.0000030476958,0.000013432616,0.03739687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968723,0.00005433115,0.00008651968,0.00017744479,0.00024123535,0.0000057159386,0.000019792604,0.000005564676,0.002537086],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996526,0.00006907105,0.00010238165,0.00007541745,0.00004494433,0.000055579832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970466,0.00010010438,0.000071947215,0.00006343522,0.00004836506,0.000011495847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011967629,0.000046448316,0.00006681742,0.000012726415,0.00012104276,0.000018644023,0.00004019982,0.000019960711,0.0005075323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015267793,0.000032180345,0.000020786862,0.0000075653825,0.0001572356,0.00012111373,0.000015428333,0.000063726264,0.000026810974],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018589575,0.00006819628,0.014741135,0.000016511076,0.00005323998,7.020447e-7,0.86315256,7.75385e-8,0.0025535005,0.09870916,0.0006881714,0.019998172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020818638,0.00055296556,0.22264521,0.0001850329,0.0003259158,0.000004105873,0.27041945,0.00017481911,0.07855284,0.09275351,0.33167183,0.0006324616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070191245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005012765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5927331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004019979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000070535466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5557123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983036506","doi":"10.1167/12.9.33","title":"Judging faces on trustworthiness and emotions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vision","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Psychology; Trustworthiness; Social psychology; Anger; Valence (chemistry); Face (sociological concept); Face perception; Dominance (genetics); Cognitive psychology; Perception","score_opus":0.0617752597605914,"score_gpt":0.313952061054982,"score_spread":0.25217680129439063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983036506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844537,0.00070881436,0.00007897931,0.0013225082,0.0017395277,0.000028458642,0.0000021509206,0.0000074389286,0.011658447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99703,0.0001316558,0.00011169335,0.0002670752,0.0014749476,1.8945441e-7,5.2943955e-7,0.000006343442,0.0009775374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946964,0.000052865835,0.0001917507,0.000040815346,0.00013681603,0.00010812931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947715,0.000110397545,0.00018211744,0.00005673686,0.000108057204,0.00006553052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050382817,0.00006175636,0.00014125844,0.00008032719,0.00020613155,0.0000559524,0.000050027407,0.000032655844,0.000093100054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049518385,0.000041682077,0.00005932569,0.000013708327,0.00010689193,0.00036374174,0.000013865328,0.00022525551,0.000010223636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012889937,0.00082954083,0.011166205,0.00016938077,0.00016953712,0.000017614244,0.14209841,0.000069928814,0.0016770276,0.74032956,0.015191369,0.08815252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017549236,0.0017278129,0.17299333,0.00091102376,0.00027135728,0.00017195409,0.027472105,0.00017865722,0.0004565007,0.034277853,0.75925994,0.00052455824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007743252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015023648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74406856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000095718815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010670887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16997458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987355271","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00007.x","title":"Epistemic Side Constraints and the Structure of Epistemic Normativity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Rationality; Constraint (computer-aided design); Order (exchange); Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics; Economics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.023699987076120508,"score_gpt":0.22233272757256536,"score_spread":0.19863274049644486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987355271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95257944,0.0020500636,0.00008228826,0.017361397,0.0005673394,0.00021392097,0.0002380158,0.0000119525885,0.026895585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781775,0.000024308609,0.00003338343,0.00031051936,0.0014847646,4.5938475e-7,0.0000018450293,0.000015859221,0.0003111154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983809,0.0004701039,0.0006302894,0.00008717242,0.00027418157,0.0001573822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978836,0.00058976654,0.0009881809,0.00023506611,0.0002666512,0.000036726986],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010019753,0.00016653689,0.00044880543,0.00005544689,0.0002954931,0.00005288714,0.0003464462,0.00006376965,0.00009862517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006823564,0.00008025844,0.00023600664,0.000031408814,0.0043677823,0.00010851442,0.00004122638,0.0005568588,0.0000089509585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001769904,0.00003449526,0.00025031145,0.000109038825,0.00017216716,0.000005270544,0.04844451,0.00003028063,0.0015997511,0.94850075,0.00008601093,0.00059039844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012160536,0.00006696071,0.00009857648,0.00011291587,0.00015973333,0.00014062872,0.005596909,0.0000104596265,0.00035170253,0.9916145,0.00053106423,0.00010049713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015633708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015333961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04523831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000146240245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000550952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988614922","doi":"10.1111/j.0029-4624.2004.00479.x","title":"Epistemic Virtues, Metavirtues, and Computational Complexity","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Noûs","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Virtue; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Verstehen","score_opus":0.10526565768056691,"score_gpt":0.2817324138864518,"score_spread":0.17646675620588492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988614922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.775466,0.004310569,0.005551685,0.014736668,0.0026724618,0.00062117295,0.0002935509,0.00050587155,0.19584201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939669,0.000024414498,0.0020560934,0.0013899306,0.0004438582,0.0000068826816,0.00006537643,0.000016032644,0.0020305105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919856,0.000056471912,0.00020532738,0.00020997811,0.00016003866,0.00016962619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995084,0.00010135637,0.000076972006,0.00013682898,0.00010648249,0.00007000202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022581106,0.000129908,0.00021734434,0.00004560849,0.0003370632,0.000111739086,0.00009993322,0.000053669482,0.00018087146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024223387,0.00011780738,0.00006422792,0.00002020842,0.000963207,0.00019142148,0.00003990896,0.0002023094,0.00013729536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007300227,0.000057751065,0.00008166655,0.00003398454,0.000037099453,0.0000044099747,0.005970363,0.00008464951,0.000028544839,0.9926774,0.00023133194,0.0007855173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006339999,0.00008611781,0.0013653829,0.000026876454,0.000041501153,0.000014594192,0.0010163226,0.000078895144,0.000049275837,0.9223818,0.07410873,0.00019648821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007313785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001171346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21850088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035874247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006804664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48040456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990488681","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2004.12.007","title":"Naturalized epistemology, or what the Strong Programme can’t explain","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Rationality; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy of science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2651493157997661,"score_gpt":0.34166672357479155,"score_spread":0.07651740777502547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990488681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5402518,0.25357386,0.0000030472931,0.05706432,0.017906928,0.0016957825,0.00003861897,0.0001346055,0.12933104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938063,0.0020060514,0.000099988596,0.0010848703,0.00071065756,0.000062795,0.000001239644,0.000006949808,0.0022211177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986235,0.00012412423,0.00033647713,0.00031680719,0.00024780474,0.00035127482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990237,0.00032462206,0.00017246781,0.00024068846,0.00018334076,0.000055202163],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014335796,0.00016139215,0.0003465039,0.00011821301,0.00074305653,0.000034098837,0.00034110664,0.000042844105,0.000054853477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020776138,0.00009804787,0.000060551505,0.000087040775,0.025486289,0.00056428247,0.000121722245,0.00026419837,0.0000037939215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065081585,0.0000791653,0.00010927928,0.00013829715,0.00004008266,0.0000051932557,0.241539,0.0000040226028,0.00002467621,0.75187045,0.0019730092,0.0041517634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006010062,0.00030660356,0.000044613193,0.0002694286,0.00004260071,0.000011344076,0.06906103,0.0000262478,0.00006621216,0.057575423,0.8717154,0.00028007678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009041721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002558288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8697424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020315172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015358243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97716576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991160143","doi":"10.5007/1808-1711.2012v16n2p297","title":"The cognitive importance of testimony","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Principia an international journal of epistemology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Cognition; Epistemology; Function (biology); Psychology; Power (physics); Reliability (semiconductor); Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.07992154211989265,"score_gpt":0.3403069579943643,"score_spread":0.2603854158744716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991160143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95631266,0.0009987034,0.0002596941,0.0013496706,0.0059820376,0.00008891379,0.000027732165,0.00001009861,0.034970485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955142,0.00010651644,0.00022752486,0.00046585014,0.0024024576,0.0000035824626,0.0000050929402,0.000013432747,0.0012613566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983792,0.00022979648,0.00072738336,0.00009294402,0.00033597628,0.00023473879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962145,0.00094339094,0.0010545963,0.00014510957,0.0015386599,0.00010372655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013982785,0.00011889207,0.0002700937,0.00009924753,0.00015260212,0.00004348367,0.00056798005,0.000065076645,0.00021177203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007627306,0.000080517006,0.00016174333,0.000021336737,0.00093692343,0.00047473956,0.00006815461,0.000324972,0.000019073743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019274063,0.00025514895,0.16091129,0.000013737532,0.00036975107,0.00002333037,0.009059127,0.0000029517967,0.00013391435,0.8267963,0.00026107123,0.0019806456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034727165,0.002215213,0.32041448,0.0003609999,0.00052055647,0.0022901741,0.014410378,0.0001127702,0.0024542853,0.120480336,0.5324861,0.0007820176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004421578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019929215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70631593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047317943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001142874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34521332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992034051","doi":"10.1017/s0012217311000333","title":"How to Be an Epistemic Value Pluralist","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Pluralism (philosophy); Monism; Sketch; Value pluralism; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.17957963643219838,"score_gpt":0.2722297903846509,"score_spread":0.09265015395245252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992034051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5257314,0.00024987286,0.00039646315,0.017685007,0.0068233707,0.00070765807,0.00048944785,0.00046579412,0.44745103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97793186,0.000009381943,0.00031986274,0.005470075,0.0013778183,0.00003106267,0.000118116586,0.00003101072,0.014710821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990026,0.00012693071,0.00016961747,0.00027410133,0.00013075219,0.00029602426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991947,0.000062752755,0.000069770984,0.00038891318,0.00012458452,0.00015928468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026950025,0.00016314843,0.000237367,0.00006755758,0.00025219424,0.0001382941,0.00027466347,0.000086732914,0.00022794031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008113504,0.00014333325,0.00009788608,0.000027879401,0.0003637907,0.00027516086,0.00004526265,0.00018610904,0.00016820637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014175576,0.00007050457,0.00012799265,0.000023659542,0.000023222314,0.000009743762,0.10619048,4.391688e-7,0.00019165815,0.8881896,0.0046872827,0.00047124515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036533808,0.0004332228,0.0009084658,0.000028334094,0.000071348455,0.0000061743963,0.010654781,0.000011969268,0.0014182845,0.107394874,0.87816674,0.00054044585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002825786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01020932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8734795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022497185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034168785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.584496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992103826","doi":"10.1017/s0953820812000374","title":"Playing Dice with Morality: Weighted Lotteries and the Number Problem","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Lottery; Dice; Morality; Outcome (game theory); Action (physics); Economics; Mathematical economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Microeconomics; Law and economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.028476265113334016,"score_gpt":0.22992297309469634,"score_spread":0.20144670798136233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992103826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74625075,0.00040039103,0.000025512383,0.006917699,0.00017896561,0.00042811048,0.000016961105,0.00008342037,0.24569817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99033844,0.000021255752,0.00034238363,0.0012713078,0.00020293587,0.000071117516,0.000007797397,0.000014735035,0.0077300505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992325,0.00011895767,0.00015805237,0.00017039267,0.00012502105,0.00019510713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993361,0.00023492523,0.00006271427,0.00021035799,0.000114742164,0.00004113917],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026864707,0.00012662982,0.00019565258,0.000013944473,0.00047154716,0.00019122289,0.000098490025,0.000039810824,0.0009540141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000151699915,0.00006670435,0.000037135258,0.000019686751,0.0018671326,0.00025236123,0.00004618963,0.0001919577,0.00015699095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045422275,0.000025058387,0.0037799943,0.000085273525,0.00008265731,0.0000016610223,0.05306634,8.731355e-8,0.0000071363097,0.93897325,0.0030508137,0.0008822887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030320196,0.00016050407,0.012747454,0.00016374848,0.0002706937,0.000033887864,0.03724096,0.0003022389,0.0000802502,0.42416397,0.52116185,0.0006423955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028551132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007315739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51811105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006490108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017572562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993280526","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01253.x","title":"QUANTUM PHYSICS AND THEOLOGY: JOHN POLKINGHORNE ON THOUGHT EXPERIMENTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zygon®","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Eschatology; Subject (documents); Thought experiment; Nothing; Philosophy; Epistemology; History of physics; Philosophy of physics; Physics; Modern physics; Theoretical physics; Theology; Computer science","score_opus":0.10103322677938852,"score_gpt":0.3067831112680287,"score_spread":0.20574988448864018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993280526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53453404,0.0025035394,0.00015691781,0.00077358534,0.0037465708,0.00022030082,0.000024359368,0.0001538952,0.45788682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98673874,0.00005906398,0.00007097337,0.0014045275,0.0024155953,0.000014470801,0.000011098759,0.000027088283,0.009258466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906284,0.00012431672,0.00015095832,0.00018213021,0.00012231374,0.0003574259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939156,0.00015622562,0.00008168825,0.00024002018,0.00004198104,0.00008851482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030661377,0.00016809024,0.000219048,0.000032842378,0.00029933505,0.00005044686,0.00010595257,0.00007984496,0.00024512233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030051866,0.00013471734,0.0000658384,0.000018620574,0.00051093544,0.00020124907,0.000054497134,0.0002282163,0.00023394036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016930728,0.00015447289,0.00062855915,0.000017079765,0.00004114115,0.000001286924,0.030282551,3.1163913e-7,0.00020478826,0.96430427,0.0024107809,0.0019378482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080402114,0.00033659113,0.0014449675,0.000060625465,0.00009575383,0.00000908753,0.00600743,0.000056996294,0.0075913314,0.15011874,0.83287627,0.0005982107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000770274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022658238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83046544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014751171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012707179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54936135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995999972","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300014104","title":"The Universe Is One: Towards a Theory of Knowledge and LifePaul A. Olivier Lanham, MD, University Press of America, 1999, XL, 203 p.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Universe; Sociology; Library science; Theology; Media studies; Physics; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Astrophysics","score_opus":0.060481147476583584,"score_gpt":0.22814091701381292,"score_spread":0.16765976953722933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995999972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15415426,0.027217638,0.00014161711,0.0008073628,0.0011422638,0.0005049703,0.0011728746,0.000073659656,0.81478536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94599605,0.013704659,0.000040954015,0.0002293722,0.00030331325,0.0000015817865,0.00001828584,0.00001744188,0.03968837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921066,0.00025329736,0.00014495735,0.00014196224,0.00009472076,0.0001544165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903977,0.00037067378,0.00014062348,0.00024136434,0.0001577885,0.00004980355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024114054,0.00010438864,0.0002466532,0.00004177142,0.00021727986,0.000014436741,0.00019554862,0.00006531582,0.00023556282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050537175,0.00008259775,0.00009380389,0.000038357353,0.0014995589,0.00009199835,0.00011094136,0.00015494815,0.000018619521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008116573,0.0003469293,0.00015316824,0.00018109618,0.00029046513,0.000007916231,0.11286884,0.0000011162119,0.00006896526,0.799807,0.058368135,0.027825208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035775412,0.00010709467,0.0002567025,0.000034091412,0.00011654272,6.874002e-7,0.0063341837,0.00003601522,0.00026045216,0.004133945,0.98824,0.00012253587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011585436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92987186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012853019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003172926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5525187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998570890","doi":"10.1007/s11017-004-4804-4","title":"Ethical Reasoning And The Embodied, Socially Situated Subject","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Metamedicine","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Situated; Philosophy of medicine; Embodied cognition; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Ontology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.1187775919735823,"score_gpt":0.3617884733723568,"score_spread":0.24301088139877453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998570890","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000016249111,0.9093485,0.000017308841,0.0048162374,0.0010549525,0.0005747379,0.00002224313,0.000084676205,0.08407972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000039444083,0.9763789,0.00008185762,0.0030262223,0.0065097148,0.00006712627,0.00009428159,0.00006260462,0.013739836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671745,0.0012835949,0.00077937177,0.0004270716,0.00041033392,0.00038214508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966946,0.0021197947,0.00049123,0.0004173876,0.00017076041,0.00010621385],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039508315,0.00048647443,0.0027761657,0.00012191516,0.0005872611,0.0001183176,0.0003412993,0.00061108125,0.0004725495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010411766,0.00024903077,0.00053307955,0.00007538324,0.0035940523,0.000052159525,0.00010530674,0.0029739933,0.000107677435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012902344,0.000014504692,1.5274206e-7,0.0018234901,0.0004242845,0.000010823035,0.0099091,2.122028e-8,1.5237596e-8,0.5499651,0.0030679281,0.43477172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080509385,0.000052479954,3.59669e-7,0.0029809312,0.0037998362,0.000028618215,0.000688626,0.0000049434657,2.9137325e-8,0.005266589,0.9861092,0.00026331417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002989026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001207029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9830412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044749064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034206695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999514253","doi":"10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9","title":"Presupposition and the a priori","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Presupposition; A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Philosophy of mind; Rationalization (economics); Philosophy of science","score_opus":0.18194464978820737,"score_gpt":0.3315458218216278,"score_spread":0.1496011720334204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999514253","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20080146,0.09333337,0.000031688644,0.39441583,0.0038743224,0.00093997474,0.000035166162,0.00023988604,0.3063283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931301,0.00072920375,0.00002119538,0.0019113792,0.003544927,0.00004046032,0.0000015983453,0.0000073352526,0.0006138127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932647,0.00012515036,0.00013990814,0.00010224703,0.00011795012,0.00018829085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992326,0.0004852565,0.000047734327,0.00010922771,0.00008199217,0.00004316984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004509617,0.0001006314,0.00021114736,0.000014401675,0.00054378883,0.00003548637,0.00006311266,0.000033263226,0.000030897303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016458116,0.000053919117,0.000060111786,0.000012857541,0.0020143015,0.0001370704,0.000089564994,0.00019025385,0.000041511412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003595697,0.000034492834,0.00014439646,0.000034946504,0.000121701545,3.3061934e-7,0.04606499,4.7650076e-8,0.00000327125,0.9526033,0.0005997276,0.00035683042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056807813,0.000043675842,0.00044606466,0.000017458124,0.00012413968,0.0000034477207,0.0021919247,0.000004079394,0.000015271924,0.9062938,0.09018608,0.000105985906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021586684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025865018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79232866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009390423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000036906813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7421778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000132399","doi":"10.1017/s0012217310000077","title":"Does Epistemic “Ought” Imply “Can”?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029757198700302873,"score_gpt":0.24767829986835194,"score_spread":0.21792110116804905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000132399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6595287,0.00011402884,0.00003604357,0.012928648,0.023334112,0.0003840882,0.00045317417,0.00036229164,0.30285892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97511995,0.000022281023,0.000086829314,0.0017325454,0.00392947,0.000025887419,0.00010285957,0.000028183866,0.018952016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899787,0.000062513034,0.00023980906,0.00025406867,0.00013174907,0.00031402212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911106,0.00018762737,0.00009679552,0.00038578463,0.0001269524,0.00009179245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002962414,0.00016711987,0.00024536034,0.00005649725,0.0003249548,0.000115204304,0.00024831205,0.00013365649,0.00079384114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010039104,0.000102961894,0.00013636015,0.000022861335,0.0006907533,0.000121361474,0.000045494882,0.00052134355,0.00040859575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068557765,0.00005431271,0.00066345953,0.00004006104,0.00003285352,0.000008886462,0.019766923,1.6497398e-7,0.002640552,0.96871376,0.0062955236,0.001776619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002563662,0.000041206637,0.00055037293,0.000011401323,0.000033622942,0.0000039505826,0.0010237264,0.000003770573,0.0014697479,0.16985561,0.82649636,0.00025386078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094401755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024753127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82020086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010843442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060676197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003018970","doi":"10.1017/s0953820808003208","title":"Benefit versus Numbers versus Helping the Worst-off: An Alternative to the Prevalent Approach to the Just Distribution of Resources","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"sort; Metric (unit); Distribution (mathematics); Aggregate (composite); Characterization (materials science); Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Operations management","score_opus":0.1623778619965742,"score_gpt":0.3084663210537725,"score_spread":0.14608845905719828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003018970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93281776,0.0011279136,0.00016801641,0.005578589,0.0026554575,0.000927647,0.00041376098,0.000052633022,0.056258224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99603415,0.00007582438,0.000032552016,0.00035652466,0.0010467223,0.000069154994,0.000056642803,0.00001531469,0.0023131236],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855286,0.0002536038,0.00025857575,0.0002812127,0.00036375158,0.0002900106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843657,0.00056358817,0.0001134237,0.00062064215,0.00018978637,0.0000759853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074283394,0.00017090591,0.00019010334,0.000025595533,0.0010324869,0.00005714419,0.00062314933,0.000049143007,0.00005706138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020116963,0.00008207619,0.00013398635,0.00008741981,0.0006995247,0.00010464418,0.00013652805,0.00028494722,0.00004969458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011244067,0.00022046857,0.000084248575,0.00004901149,0.0002975191,0.0000014791846,0.58330643,0.0017171777,0.00000547858,0.39548483,0.011823836,0.0058850977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008516189,0.00060537196,0.003100295,0.00004504199,0.00019129003,0.000002613726,0.123346135,0.0005103645,0.00014183113,0.0010609581,0.86989367,0.00025083288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014756195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003464425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85806984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006884739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029781439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79411584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003146617","doi":"10.4000/etudes-benthamiennes.675","title":"Sidgwick’s Argument for Utilitarianism and his Moral Epistemology: A Reply to David Phillips","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d’études benthamiennes","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Object (grammar); Medicine","score_opus":0.06728666743146006,"score_gpt":0.2621656290886392,"score_spread":0.19487896165717916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003146617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93000174,0.0015808359,0.00024428594,0.03203478,0.003067739,0.0032797463,0.0002989649,0.0002993465,0.029192543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97854525,0.000083114435,0.0017105849,0.0036093642,0.0012082596,0.0005548781,0.000068257024,0.000058757934,0.014161507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800915,0.00009871002,0.00051787467,0.0006520494,0.00014307715,0.0005791538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841005,0.0003773123,0.00017153272,0.0005176773,0.00029485827,0.00022855113],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004466112,0.00033765574,0.00056564016,0.00013796793,0.00047054118,0.00018960355,0.0002799309,0.00013127462,0.00032904756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018640242,0.00030728892,0.00019875634,0.000045051966,0.0004835041,0.00031682797,0.00014572014,0.0002143801,0.00014855353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033926277,0.00020995253,0.000718355,0.00042790527,0.00014490976,0.0000072335206,0.030734915,0.0000055330634,0.00039817442,0.95738304,0.0066530625,0.0032830185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009211074,0.0009932881,0.00317252,0.0001942903,0.00019548286,0.000037888978,0.0096440585,0.00020684973,0.00030801145,0.07695427,0.90658784,0.0007844009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012978731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022581145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89993477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007463019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040864605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004109686","doi":"10.1177/1056492613501228","title":"Can We “Regain” Truth and Objectivity? A Reply to Baillie and Meckler","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Inquiry","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Confusion; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Statement (logic); Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Medicine","score_opus":0.06438789368515797,"score_gpt":0.26861510834229224,"score_spread":0.20422721465713428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004109686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8786319,0.0018020249,0.00035458684,0.04269284,0.0036648544,0.00059569837,0.000007194771,0.00003323473,0.072217695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813766,0.0010436705,0.00073912984,0.005992756,0.0014037262,0.000011886127,0.0000010867776,0.000020878144,0.00941029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902225,0.000083709885,0.0003272183,0.00016432666,0.00020744251,0.00019504364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992099,0.000128556,0.00021737163,0.00016348422,0.0001431221,0.0001375877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057526736,0.00013577698,0.00027489034,0.00020343876,0.00016326747,0.00021663203,0.00011901575,0.000032710785,0.00025828945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047757567,0.00010469998,0.00006515599,0.000032748016,0.00026965898,0.0003236291,0.0001125787,0.00020786603,0.000017115726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009697347,0.00024077175,0.0008133305,0.00059790746,0.0007966689,0.00011736492,0.13153093,0.000013104891,0.000070559516,0.5947155,0.19731124,0.07369571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011103839,0.0007085207,0.0060239565,0.00027549718,0.00024656582,0.000044058663,0.045970295,0.000022452266,0.00004977025,0.12069091,0.8244956,0.00036196355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000090439054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000083856125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6271844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025947065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013781524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42695412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006480301","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00308.x","title":"The Good, the Bad, and the Social: On Living as an Answerable Agent","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Sociology; Drama; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06966309308549744,"score_gpt":0.32055127419387885,"score_spread":0.2508881811083814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006480301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5711958,0.0020967629,0.00006402158,0.0094751045,0.00093231094,0.00038881795,0.000006504733,0.0001026735,0.41573802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791212,0.00030305202,0.0000036648833,0.008633742,0.0015490844,0.000021016589,0.0000018741092,0.000012020069,0.010354367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972805,0.0018023829,0.0002054216,0.00020286546,0.00015468305,0.00035415875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895287,0.010019777,0.000104161605,0.0002444917,0.00005902873,0.00004381252],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009819241,0.00014808131,0.00019664981,0.000009384638,0.0040630247,0.0001623548,0.00035601767,0.00014228202,0.00024468976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006000699,0.00005368738,0.00015834103,0.000017584589,0.0064506275,0.000053115396,0.00008730135,0.0006986473,0.00006534428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102119375,0.000037433096,0.000043937103,0.00000271593,0.00004633064,0.0000016376799,0.07546099,4.0061522e-7,0.000006102999,0.9192863,0.0004413737,0.0045706267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017584565,0.00013850376,0.001482813,0.000006460153,0.000027953267,0.0000014495737,0.0813392,0.0000035413823,0.0000066701914,0.81056345,0.10616175,0.00009233893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048963037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012307694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4079254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019854218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018953697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99723357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008113637","doi":"10.1007/s12136-014-0222-z","title":"Swinburne on Basing and Deviant Inferential Pathways","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"Swinburne University of Technology","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Relation (database); Epistemology; Counterexample; Simple (philosophy); Subject (documents); Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06145798561347454,"score_gpt":0.2461109013355658,"score_spread":0.18465291572209125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008113637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6041496,0.00006624224,0.00020571961,0.0028875517,0.0007431125,0.0001092592,0.000016053868,0.00009304749,0.39172944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99592704,0.000025796731,0.0000444924,0.0011484991,0.0007727148,0.0000019262045,0.0000094723355,0.000014003145,0.002056042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992209,0.00006953387,0.00017265865,0.00020119913,0.00012941958,0.00020626307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993466,0.00022852185,0.00006545523,0.0002140007,0.00006582545,0.000079564095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002612261,0.00012665434,0.0002143035,0.000068385845,0.0002543396,0.00013956931,0.00009213418,0.00005685564,0.0003830372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013245932,0.00010234091,0.00006961072,0.000019354258,0.00028933457,0.000102634884,0.000036902016,0.0002017645,0.00006653141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014856175,0.00006292323,0.00023541688,0.00003533728,0.00006358931,0.0000031319275,0.006365444,6.4659423e-7,0.00030443337,0.98510104,0.0019466043,0.0058665858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067326304,0.000434913,0.0021981553,0.000110061614,0.00023758753,0.0000046396103,0.0014860611,0.00189852,0.00061959226,0.05747737,0.93440485,0.0004549791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000071470204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039404715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9324583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010838879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022187403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41939887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011931323","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzq003","title":"Conditionals, Probabilities, and Utilities: More on Two Envelopes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Argument (complex analysis); Stipulation; Basis (linear algebra); Presupposition; Absurdity; Mathematical economics; Conditional probability; Philosophy; Envelope (radar); Epistemology; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.05367025140232995,"score_gpt":0.28862454659955317,"score_spread":0.23495429519722322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011931323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8482507,0.00010101935,0.000002073918,0.0016975069,0.00079631474,0.00015181248,0.00019911726,0.000025529145,0.14877596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95779985,0.000008843573,0.00020249735,0.0009919057,0.0010438401,0.000028523433,0.000059823262,0.000014106754,0.03985062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929744,0.000032766384,0.00015428937,0.00021078961,0.00012879209,0.00017593084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937016,0.00025824373,0.00004712612,0.0001836381,0.000082428436,0.000058431073],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002099876,0.00012508329,0.00015501869,0.000044651806,0.00026375122,0.00008726818,0.000083174484,0.000060118997,0.0029159146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007905414,0.00010440371,0.000042985586,0.000010139409,0.0012278316,0.000109045766,0.000024507834,0.00028509102,0.00010396405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010173412,0.000063620246,0.00017621799,0.000046899073,0.000024294923,0.0000023659832,0.04617435,3.5654415e-7,0.00014749433,0.94698817,0.004276687,0.0020893957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029911607,0.00007412868,0.0004943575,0.000020875943,0.00001619699,0.0000045966804,0.008003378,0.000008897959,0.00089014333,0.06969285,0.9203257,0.00016979314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015307557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018001246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.916049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008125604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005640601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99799556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012272852","doi":"10.1007/s11098-012-9916-5","title":"Probabilizing the end","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Construct (python library); Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of language; Transmission (telecommunications); Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Telecommunications; Data mining; Computer network","score_opus":0.33053102000403156,"score_gpt":0.3524795400323163,"score_spread":0.021948520028284735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012272852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12522426,0.04875398,0.000012722241,0.3078743,0.005953161,0.000657776,0.000023575494,0.00031178913,0.51118845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898636,0.00024134664,0.00003221657,0.0024623477,0.006451234,0.000051817464,0.0000014840552,0.000013104456,0.00088289025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990443,0.0001122458,0.00019286023,0.0001363757,0.00018552053,0.0003287089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902076,0.00054117525,0.00006152081,0.00019670211,0.0001238895,0.000055977853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005605108,0.00013979271,0.00022808458,0.000017539109,0.00079586206,0.00003742017,0.00015233019,0.00004005196,0.00013106232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028768243,0.000075926895,0.00010641709,0.000025207326,0.0017951389,0.00015077631,0.00012565077,0.0003059031,0.00019010933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004594402,0.00006619988,0.00037389796,0.000039167702,0.00012851572,5.4828814e-7,0.041122407,2.801443e-7,0.000008420201,0.95635176,0.0012710252,0.0006332071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008644641,0.000036090885,0.00023383384,0.000015617157,0.00006192085,0.0000019786505,0.003828928,0.0000012692444,0.000028661469,0.697784,0.29780108,0.00012015696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021425481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008309307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8646393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023449065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008370222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6614264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012977568","doi":"10.1007/s10699-014-9373-z","title":"Scientific Consensus and Expert Testimony in Courts: Lessons from the Bendectin Litigation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Foundations of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University; Azrieli Foundation","keywords":"Deference; Skepticism; Scientific consensus; Philosophy of science; Epistemic community; Epistemology; Scientific evidence; Value (mathematics); Philosophy of language; Sociology; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.10588196342595235,"score_gpt":0.3314058282883268,"score_spread":0.22552386486237447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012977568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9774844,0.000104079445,0.00023600535,0.009045173,0.00094243645,0.00011950606,0.000030176872,0.00001848482,0.012019748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982986,0.0000055013074,0.0008858261,0.00018057608,0.000108892236,0.000007394681,0.000009092194,0.0000029729297,0.00050117745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992056,0.00006159808,0.00017194983,0.00021904398,0.00021084544,0.00013100277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854964,0.0007866504,0.00009465951,0.00023979273,0.00029700002,0.000032251],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012664859,0.000056370154,0.000086392254,0.00009319699,0.0011405983,0.00033868206,0.00022328473,0.000018696885,0.000053378448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001062797,0.000042171356,0.000016520473,0.00013357759,0.009695152,0.00024772732,0.000045997065,0.00009495887,0.000011221581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016505887,0.00003706914,0.0011477185,0.000003911079,0.0000024812355,1.015306e-7,0.041730236,0.000015286992,0.0028647182,0.9495902,0.00063633657,0.0039702556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006635477,0.00012704,0.07195988,0.0002019267,0.00003126655,0.0000033652555,0.038251188,0.008404657,0.0036927005,0.6568435,0.21944244,0.00037848193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017204693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053744134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29274672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000188433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016459369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014972689","doi":"10.4148/biyclc.v4i0.129","title":"Theory Of Knowledge In Britain From 1860 To 1950","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition Logic and Communication","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Sketch; Order (exchange); Ideology; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Classics; History; Law; Politics; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.0965306949269695,"score_gpt":0.28888331172728676,"score_spread":0.19235261680031726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014972689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6331723,0.0012378312,0.00057072146,0.0021561738,0.00018013497,0.00024085416,0.000058665057,0.000016784512,0.36236656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974809,0.0003769845,0.00022417885,0.0003913857,0.00007555906,0.000016595617,0.00005017223,0.0000045813267,0.0013796128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930847,0.0002207281,0.00024108478,0.00007359692,0.00010093342,0.000055189757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887764,0.0005634157,0.000120791985,0.00018477955,0.00023827798,0.000015070349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004250392,0.000056861994,0.000120003904,0.0000679491,0.00008951342,0.000007926898,0.00024562114,0.000031502,0.00022727101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092505274,0.000045257344,0.000034279023,0.000023198108,0.00056262943,0.00006859104,0.00007955201,0.000116766525,0.000027169268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006668582,0.00012263161,0.00012933637,0.000009514365,0.000035150533,2.997103e-7,0.026870998,0.0000035115568,0.00027306675,0.96928114,0.00015930233,0.0030483746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071490067,0.00010522183,0.017169442,0.00022426766,0.000045689347,0.0000038622265,0.008242788,0.00022309637,0.0007780044,0.95884943,0.013506259,0.00013705039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003400197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042309353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36430866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012503745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026339023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24884582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016435477","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.923240","title":"Justification is potential knowledge","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; University of Aberdeen","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.06459974620442645,"score_gpt":0.25092442753209715,"score_spread":0.18632468132767072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016435477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06464401,0.0027759436,0.0010111408,0.036684476,0.013450845,0.00017725622,0.00010269582,0.000026229844,0.8811274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99007386,0.000008864192,0.00006738854,0.0012725915,0.006308422,7.0338456e-7,0.000004141747,0.0000147491055,0.002249281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926186,0.00007970703,0.00028881873,0.00009225913,0.00009398969,0.00018338162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880195,0.000038279297,0.00020419498,0.00015127617,0.00046350784,0.00034076924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036501748,0.000095861666,0.0001823295,0.00021425176,0.000302871,0.00009140609,0.00021786914,0.00006291113,0.0006192601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069387876,0.00008699922,0.00014273108,0.000029317773,0.00037400765,0.00016401705,0.0000047803737,0.00027159502,0.00018299915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050945946,0.000019056757,0.000054358243,0.00004030841,0.00004608998,0.000010525288,0.017517244,0.000004744519,0.000055697306,0.9551513,0.023321439,0.0037740998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021513017,0.000109123226,0.00013175608,0.000041621443,0.000067328445,0.000020637346,0.00031084052,0.00003780501,0.00008168622,0.29421893,0.70464903,0.00011609426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076281594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00881708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9254299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046019777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038647105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67804646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016936562","doi":"10.5840/symposion2014118","title":"For True Conditionalizers Weisberg’s Paradox is a False Alarm","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposion","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.044863477369113544,"score_gpt":0.2756459070691836,"score_spread":0.23078242970007007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016936562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39086685,0.0015705223,0.009842043,0.042696886,0.013311536,0.0027189502,0.0012706554,0.000739571,0.536983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9621147,0.000055944733,0.0002903461,0.0060769804,0.0015411191,0.00009952458,0.0001892956,0.00003411878,0.029597951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914396,0.00006913623,0.00020421357,0.00022556914,0.00014498789,0.00021215594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992418,0.0002584819,0.00009472511,0.0002042599,0.0001352282,0.00006544811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031756627,0.00013218012,0.00020127544,0.000048102753,0.0003769168,0.00006604458,0.000115986666,0.00008621237,0.00048346605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004566644,0.000112528876,0.00015949497,0.000014510642,0.0002532113,0.0001236888,0.000020620642,0.000107916676,0.00017472351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026745174,0.000055546636,0.00005996739,0.0000714763,0.000027520757,4.20357e-7,0.007748513,0.0000024814624,0.00078529,0.94469637,0.045853686,0.00067196443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005342378,0.00015335946,0.00004172442,0.00003622534,0.000042116717,0.0000014385604,0.00047148782,0.00014958516,0.0012666426,0.15733473,0.8398155,0.00015295658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007590855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014085941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7939618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019135186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025767402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5293614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017501627","doi":"10.1007/s11229-013-0394-x","title":"The traditional conception of the a priori","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Government of Canada; University of Georgia","keywords":"Philosophy of language; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Independence (probability theory); A priori and a posteriori; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07577999644456604,"score_gpt":0.23780127874574028,"score_spread":0.16202128230117424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017501627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4413864,0.00029071505,0.0001567094,0.009807404,0.003917292,0.00032127782,0.000065387074,0.000053616743,0.54400116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99342036,0.000010464377,0.000010745508,0.00022302338,0.0008092057,0.000008794883,0.0000013040673,0.0000051461766,0.005510942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994643,0.00014688601,0.000114603594,0.00006447284,0.00012490219,0.000084846775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905264,0.0006008781,0.00008027618,0.00018877088,0.00006416869,0.000013277688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039704234,0.000048911934,0.00007465299,0.000007410425,0.0003268755,0.000026713622,0.00015773301,0.00002539518,0.00015493172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018739636,0.000024059796,0.000083557585,0.000010495585,0.0009506592,0.00004178374,0.000014312989,0.00010671213,0.000030533032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041800413,0.000017093578,0.00005662619,0.0000089259165,0.000012378106,3.1285076e-8,0.0073963497,0.0000010094456,0.00017472428,0.9879837,0.0012390031,0.0031059796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010222679,0.00004082074,0.0015186907,0.000031742056,0.000024321289,9.2117443e-7,0.0028446715,0.00007194551,0.0007687,0.18559694,0.80893236,0.000066646964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045898007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034718626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80769336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000067269207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022562373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35027435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017694486","doi":"10.1037/h0086865","title":"When reviews attack: Ethics, free speech, and the peer review process.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Psychology; Tone (literature); Process (computing); Peer review; Engineering ethics; Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.19331130056336224,"score_gpt":0.36765140462908175,"score_spread":0.1743401040657195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017694486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007899903,0.067923315,0.00000346987,0.44193667,0.0027443722,0.0016762139,0.00037663023,0.000118052325,0.4773214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039340675,0.11135461,0.0004248732,0.64490366,0.0025504844,0.0006529337,0.00026549862,0.00018680152,0.20032047],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507564,0.0010236177,0.0009423549,0.0010946275,0.0003386634,0.001525104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954202,0.00043744777,0.00028677593,0.0020994514,0.00073580217,0.0010203068],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072876313,0.000573399,0.0010908179,0.0002179867,0.0010833185,0.0001585798,0.0016477808,0.0005317117,0.0109400535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031562543,0.00041373353,0.0002813794,0.00018957803,0.0046368614,0.00023382292,0.00003884484,0.0023178793,0.00083622325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045573404,0.00002724763,0.00006297404,0.0003127007,0.0000837056,0.00010315942,0.016818456,2.2264264e-7,5.7590233e-7,0.049955685,0.88593864,0.04665108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013227504,0.0001056719,0.00031307567,0.0004513836,0.00015448061,0.00018792803,0.0007493759,0.00000165402,3.806644e-7,0.054370224,0.94185144,0.00049161783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1267743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91837096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79159665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001742688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004984627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017901305","doi":"10.7202/017645ar","title":"Le débat de la pertinence existentielle de la théodicée. Positions, enjeux et éclairages sur les rapports entre théorie et pratique","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Théologiques","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.041362626848814955,"score_gpt":0.29219294894205555,"score_spread":0.2508303220932406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017901305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49939921,0.025699439,0.0027217348,0.036390185,0.0007215175,0.00047652866,0.00023940456,0.00053486804,0.43381712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89645416,0.05658947,0.0021895943,0.0029315823,0.00059477484,0.000070364906,0.000105173516,0.000063681204,0.041001216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99187446,0.0061178426,0.0005587075,0.00050999096,0.00023960636,0.0006993835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958482,0.002837856,0.00034416953,0.00044814945,0.00034168543,0.00017997944],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033541375,0.00047092116,0.000562209,0.00011463924,0.0011514421,0.00027816504,0.0003793286,0.00085723924,0.00042551986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072266714,0.0004515833,0.00029538592,0.00006524247,0.003992511,0.0005153135,0.00015834802,0.0015419148,0.0000295335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049038204,0.0007862588,0.004874197,0.00028356665,0.00013980443,0.0005588302,0.08325756,0.000030511292,0.0007189147,0.8784412,0.030199232,0.0006608553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007608272,0.00092081906,0.011070582,0.000819104,0.00026403286,0.0012715602,0.030348497,0.00007177313,0.006467972,0.277774,0.6691052,0.0011256656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069334996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001901976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63890594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010939844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028699683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018109134","doi":"10.1007/s11229-010-9855-7","title":"Socially relevant philosophy of science: an introduction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Philosophy of computer science; Philosophy of language; Epistemology; Philosophy education; Philosophy of biology; Economic methodology; Western philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Social philosophy; Philosophy of sport; Social epistemology; Philosophy of mind; Metaphysics; Sociology; Philosophy of medicine; Engineering ethics; Social science; Philosophy; Social relation; Engineering","score_opus":0.04323880442566755,"score_gpt":0.28373717736337745,"score_spread":0.2404983729377099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018109134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.881782,0.000020774056,0.00000845554,0.0063778893,0.004351932,0.00010239942,0.000015521946,0.000058177524,0.10728284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933267,0.0000041993553,0.00029102474,0.00008173101,0.0047787377,0.0000039923816,0.0000029132639,0.000010457649,0.0015002185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992189,0.00004082032,0.00016449211,0.00020017657,0.00021516901,0.00016045429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991884,0.000058916532,0.000102217,0.00030694224,0.0002911781,0.000052342868],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008790464,0.00007591838,0.00014091034,0.000096087715,0.00034627717,0.00004577622,0.00022322715,0.00005211694,0.00049911335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035429065,0.000063040345,0.000052818825,0.0000453831,0.00419037,0.00032894703,0.000028362358,0.00025992427,0.00003808783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008408879,0.00008110204,0.000039337796,0.000020466772,0.000007012297,4.0791687e-7,0.017499851,3.0112543e-7,0.048983213,0.9309227,0.0002192907,0.0022179247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001793481,0.00023075903,0.00048888754,0.000016267286,0.000048701248,0.0000042029255,0.0069484874,0.000033728946,0.032866422,0.72809786,0.23081397,0.00027138868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010677729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088136847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23059468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009633823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016428396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99851966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019330996","doi":"10.1007/s11229-013-0294-0","title":"Saving Pritchard’s anti-luck virtue epistemology: the case of Temp","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Luck; Philosophy; Epistemology; Virtue; Epistemic virtue","score_opus":0.04346735699027647,"score_gpt":0.26243632322462584,"score_spread":0.21896896623434936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019330996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9314972,0.0004844759,0.000035600915,0.0031643903,0.0010044072,0.00042475635,0.000039610903,0.00006522311,0.0632843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99008566,0.00002313457,0.00007083655,0.00046331086,0.0004993505,0.00004573018,0.0000027983997,0.000026889316,0.008782303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987239,0.00028755,0.00036824867,0.00023088463,0.00011032792,0.0002790403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816567,0.00081775826,0.00020066142,0.00053963775,0.00021536436,0.000060887713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006505911,0.00017698162,0.0003531638,0.00006229767,0.0003784858,0.000106376305,0.0002857941,0.00010280842,0.00087443076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027796577,0.000113967195,0.00016094474,0.00003471748,0.0012161663,0.00027565187,0.00008878763,0.0003070282,0.00032968257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008749198,0.00016107988,0.00068872527,0.00024753227,0.00017654053,0.0001991925,0.032754317,0.000004721363,0.002269564,0.9539982,0.0034220906,0.0060692504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017768798,0.0008323445,0.0058429088,0.00091858214,0.0008331881,0.0027285018,0.23412994,0.0009159793,0.017141981,0.29746652,0.43484965,0.0025635276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004539146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017504278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65653175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016631733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046376972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9574404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021095616","doi":"10.1007/s10670-010-9221-7","title":"Developmental Process Reliabilism: on Justification, Defeat, and Evidence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Epistemology; Process (computing); Ontology; Internalism and externalism; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.08143505972504642,"score_gpt":0.29671524185062126,"score_spread":0.21528018212557484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021095616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9465399,0.00020752719,0.0000129267355,0.002245142,0.0009803211,0.00019183813,0.000009344268,0.0000912943,0.049721725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990067,0.00004612079,0.00036991655,0.0007287778,0.00049932,0.000035124587,0.0000055039936,0.000015873065,0.008232344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919957,0.000032418142,0.00017763654,0.00027148152,0.0001519582,0.00016690817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929553,0.00023856157,0.00007488168,0.00015403396,0.00016830701,0.00006865443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035358354,0.0001239078,0.00013026116,0.000045718454,0.00040381023,0.000107253545,0.00014537758,0.00007338218,0.0003492296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033698222,0.00010491531,0.00003042831,0.00002731134,0.00054519536,0.00021386961,0.000024511612,0.00034069322,0.00018799839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065549204,0.00020798843,0.005124693,0.00042567865,0.00004971754,0.0000069509056,0.13353628,0.0000018844426,0.00545725,0.8299333,0.014994098,0.0101966085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005930858,0.0002735679,0.017145187,0.00034673454,0.000117991876,0.00003702281,0.0144740185,0.00005763125,0.0081579145,0.05463921,0.9032445,0.0009131283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006734403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008570724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8882504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012553629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008372145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4278322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023038545","doi":"10.1111/1468-0017.00199","title":"False Photos, False Beliefs, and Coherence: A Response to Kamawar <i>et al.</i>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind & Language","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.04275782833178031,"score_gpt":0.2793803977913255,"score_spread":0.23662256945954518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023038545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96739924,0.0057132985,0.000023056235,0.0067681805,0.00041203326,0.00031863642,0.00022554153,0.0000903975,0.019049594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9177757,0.000088162415,0.00027409644,0.022388913,0.00032928944,0.000044139637,0.000023439965,0.000038501646,0.059037767],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866426,0.00023820969,0.00022624157,0.00035311515,0.00019721208,0.000320972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906796,0.00034872763,0.00005224074,0.00032472258,0.000057364035,0.0001489644],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006513058,0.00020414538,0.00026246236,0.000103182785,0.00022508916,0.00021188114,0.00015738302,0.00006813552,0.002378018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014539907,0.00017804399,0.000076335375,0.000047095284,0.0002838333,0.00016847343,0.000057551566,0.00027819126,0.0003958651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002707861,0.000300473,0.00012628235,0.00010902402,0.000120385885,0.00050988153,0.75168025,0.0000021137612,0.029356021,0.021620553,0.1660589,0.02984535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003758209,0.00020945806,0.00012401577,0.00007849445,0.00002498642,0.000016808686,0.008195936,0.000020820955,0.001498389,0.00028736104,0.98888546,0.0002824397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041989842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001574497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82282656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018708053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002719314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023111101","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01014.x","title":"Introduction: Philosophy in and Philosophy of Cognitive Science","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Topics in Cognitive Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Experimental philosophy; Normative; Philosophy of mind; Epistemology; Western philosophy; Philosophy of science; Psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy of computer science; Philosophy; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.08674229483091075,"score_gpt":0.3277596229913722,"score_spread":0.24101732816046142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023111101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7458882,0.000251743,0.000042757358,0.0055913753,0.00070657715,0.00028993725,0.00001983038,0.000019163674,0.24719048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99775434,0.000053672407,0.00007643389,0.00078797544,0.0010231105,0.0000065917275,0.0000021064775,0.000003785509,0.00029201267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833906,0.000052485848,0.00030087607,0.0005417438,0.00042873292,0.00033713243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876636,0.00020069527,0.000120404664,0.00014228329,0.0006970369,0.000073209725],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013736885,0.00013642535,0.00024245252,0.0005406996,0.00032606907,0.000084713305,0.00028157368,0.000041692758,0.00007408578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011607182,0.00012956599,0.000028776953,0.000615962,0.0106052,0.00079175096,0.000088013454,0.00032651177,0.000008066254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003587832,0.00018520228,0.0023148286,0.0000260398,0.0000028253971,0.000008208991,0.027234841,8.911435e-7,0.0003560841,0.9575317,0.00000954137,0.012293951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011588513,0.00064603036,0.035490263,0.000539189,0.000017943961,0.000009700485,0.009053512,0.00008427667,0.005987595,0.94591695,0.0007023011,0.00039338777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003819374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010540272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25186616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048778464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000243961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99208736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024283275","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9203-1","title":"Enthymemes: From Reconstruction to Understanding","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Phenomenon; Set (abstract data type); Resolution (logic); Philosophy; Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","score_opus":0.3097350493222602,"score_gpt":0.28115900681270983,"score_spread":0.02857604250955037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024283275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70065296,0.000042332034,0.008328325,0.00053500716,0.0037290354,0.000266933,0.000032950295,0.0001187162,0.28629377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683595,0.000010673393,0.0011832096,0.00056154147,0.0003289146,0.000012567267,0.00003329583,0.000008850512,0.0010250113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995126,0.000037240257,0.00013884547,0.0001353305,0.00007717866,0.00009876645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999749,0.000037370246,0.000061355866,0.00008833063,0.000026817137,0.00003714244],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009257671,0.00006535326,0.000074305215,0.00005469052,0.00017761136,0.000044441294,0.00004733778,0.000026742322,0.0025257021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010220372,0.000064384294,0.000032105112,0.00001888875,0.00008402992,0.00025395944,0.0000100553925,0.000058289785,0.00026440047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023572078,0.00003317117,0.0013887275,0.0000075289763,0.000048160364,9.699471e-7,0.20616598,7.376478e-7,0.0006301496,0.7852274,0.00079831365,0.005675249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007492104,0.00025198894,0.0031940658,0.00007755642,0.00012243638,0.0000023308255,0.18367207,0.0000422664,0.012852167,0.779895,0.018744282,0.0003966369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009478506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012788221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.296183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006905833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010263958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99838614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026055402","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2014.907542","title":"No Work for a Theory of Grounding","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":771,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Economics; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.1570767361856183,"score_gpt":0.30786570342929775,"score_spread":0.15078896724367946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026055402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31493962,0.00062341377,0.02910324,0.00038900442,0.015863672,0.0005245954,0.00002520775,0.00017274237,0.6383585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825584,0.000004560868,0.00033781677,0.00044887688,0.0031030488,0.000018366747,0.000006287633,0.000015020762,0.013507594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994647,0.00007645819,0.00015414409,0.00010481674,0.00006455629,0.00013536222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900544,0.0006114598,0.00008404245,0.00016074518,0.00011571478,0.000022624705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007078691,0.00006904343,0.00015980542,0.000033595017,0.00014354012,0.00002460002,0.000104990526,0.000046453486,0.0001399047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018496308,0.000057822468,0.00009258654,0.0000127978465,0.0005551199,0.00007065066,0.00001913649,0.0000808529,0.0000583252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034440007,0.000024689907,0.00009425548,0.00008418539,0.000024705574,1.182024e-7,0.028628465,5.522268e-7,0.000045843026,0.964368,0.0027237248,0.003971057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027092532,0.00013479378,0.00017132284,0.00006522509,0.000035534496,3.0078635e-7,0.0033663902,0.000007807491,0.00015675205,0.2807589,0.7149143,0.000117725605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011461254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023693894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7121906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000065556437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000097902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23579317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026241495","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.944814","title":"Lexical norms, language comprehension, and the epistemology of testimony","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Comprehension; Underwriting; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.035859880952245314,"score_gpt":0.23333721370638028,"score_spread":0.19747733275413495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026241495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7071772,0.008460103,0.00022248813,0.056212444,0.0032207868,0.00029506232,0.000083732724,0.0000160307,0.22431214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965599,0.000012602798,0.0001011014,0.0018402511,0.0012085953,6.379879e-7,0.0000018707632,0.0000102346485,0.0002648139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910074,0.0002071138,0.00035332562,0.000078625766,0.00009827605,0.00016190388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867123,0.00043599907,0.00026388105,0.00015650244,0.00025045767,0.00022190317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005827216,0.000098056786,0.0003588461,0.000118713695,0.00020643648,0.000031700507,0.00019785049,0.0000602394,0.00011590373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025218632,0.00006172201,0.00011101339,0.000024460353,0.0022494786,0.00006990252,0.000012653663,0.00031384922,0.000007512204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027365359,0.000009556688,0.0005708353,0.000045064648,0.000047930393,0.000022940098,0.011875101,0.0000037909595,0.000030262323,0.9850883,0.0015204606,0.00075838435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002106303,0.00048763823,0.0017609079,0.00015062359,0.00015862343,0.000262317,0.0016140543,0.00009020976,0.000074263866,0.8495161,0.14356776,0.00021120015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003965433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016555166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2893827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013792075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017426473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92381716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027938774","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x09000648","title":"Non-interpretative metacognition for true beliefs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Interpretation (philosophy); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Neuroscience; Linguistics","score_opus":0.13170999151212884,"score_gpt":0.3682362702415026,"score_spread":0.23652627872937373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027938774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96807265,0.0002740166,0.0005183762,0.006646396,0.00066901004,0.00040879915,0.00007862278,0.0000568536,0.0232753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99400204,0.000007883933,0.0005534533,0.0018781854,0.00026794782,0.000020363703,0.0000105678055,0.0000032975004,0.0032562467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992734,0.000027686287,0.00014508999,0.00023567064,0.00012619642,0.0001919119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996281,0.0001107202,0.000066556364,0.00005515984,0.00009145478,0.000047998135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044396863,0.00010248341,0.00015722976,0.000058865447,0.0006006256,0.00018126616,0.000114692164,0.000036420257,0.000058489833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024836478,0.00007334742,0.0000735389,0.00003767275,0.0009789629,0.0003479961,0.0000126509,0.00007404159,0.0000067381875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058573773,0.0004781973,0.0005586705,0.0000438201,0.000021131744,0.0000051837287,0.16406019,0.000001453476,0.0066349744,0.6664794,0.0067887665,0.15486963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025300677,0.012051566,0.012492974,0.00028055112,0.0004359067,0.000022755663,0.06362685,0.00064879353,0.011499028,0.73120385,0.16356586,0.0016418147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007859197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026492646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1567771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005095885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028270022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4619587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028155864","doi":"10.1007/s10670-011-9271-5","title":"Believing For a Reason","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Ontology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.24672533188121026,"score_gpt":0.27170041660330635,"score_spread":0.024975084722096086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028155864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04701462,0.0008384572,0.000994857,0.0005896751,0.0025710035,0.00040090346,0.00006698679,0.00021494078,0.94730854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9425979,0.00004380077,0.0024424833,0.0010424647,0.0016817042,0.00007852474,0.000020125426,0.0000401592,0.052052792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938136,0.000028773953,0.00014629622,0.00016242912,0.000069178444,0.00021198155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949163,0.00009823,0.00006603891,0.00019246645,0.00010490148,0.000046704285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026077664,0.00009807776,0.00015015378,0.000034115114,0.00027219066,0.000036572645,0.00012677377,0.00005194433,0.0008479755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006898672,0.00008591361,0.000113429305,0.000012277737,0.00020325521,0.000115739545,0.000022702145,0.00010562234,0.00013155275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022611779,0.000058447673,0.00022969756,0.000053182568,0.000040219387,0.0000018485769,0.061862133,4.7339054e-8,0.00004344277,0.9204056,0.012068068,0.0052146614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023929753,0.00013607962,0.0003327273,0.00002720723,0.000046994115,0.0000015259661,0.0024380423,0.000017748405,0.0004308599,0.059777465,0.9363861,0.00016595633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029977763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073076005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.924318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010593601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002253124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9284737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028438277","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01016.x","title":"Why Cognitive Science Needs Philosophy and Vice Versa","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Topics in Cognitive Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Normative; Generality; Cognition; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09463861549067291,"score_gpt":0.32932463676283885,"score_spread":0.23468602127216592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028438277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43503553,0.00024771414,0.00017788465,0.0038097235,0.0008085819,0.00029796496,0.000027484466,0.000051799263,0.5595433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889283,0.000052313197,0.00008416966,0.009635072,0.00046312404,0.0000071815953,0.000002318951,0.0000054133498,0.000822105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998165,0.000051189963,0.00022098066,0.0005165825,0.00054087973,0.0005053755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984586,0.00029040463,0.00009407413,0.0001497387,0.00086011185,0.00014703425],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012240696,0.00017571122,0.00021351996,0.00052271195,0.0009646542,0.00032131403,0.00039387232,0.000050394367,0.00008893899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008304322,0.00016392868,0.000035418852,0.00067578413,0.010367834,0.001092507,0.00012649763,0.00037147084,0.000027647493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003424634,0.00013470722,0.0009261617,0.00001987356,0.0000057861917,0.000017388034,0.058391575,3.8952783e-7,0.00039172487,0.9197025,0.000063526924,0.02031215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033037649,0.0016911966,0.03055024,0.0011187213,0.00013562776,0.000034829758,0.07279081,0.0004309112,0.01071654,0.84933317,0.028263196,0.0016310031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000099666664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001698482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5587212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006061592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003090575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99232537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028647064","doi":"10.1177/0306312711414759","title":"Models of democracy in social studies of science","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Studies of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Democracy; Politics; Deliberative democracy; Sociology; Egalitarianism; Normative; Political philosophy; Publics; Public reason; Epistemology; Vision; Environmental ethics; Public sphere; Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.40765696991575573,"score_gpt":0.3948934533291963,"score_spread":0.012763516586559442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028647064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9486894,0.001607968,0.0000072341013,0.00037152192,0.0007893717,0.000141662,0.000016183249,0.000012228722,0.048364446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900556,0.00032467666,0.000220134,0.0000530702,0.00016532686,0.000006088826,1.0096418e-7,0.000004802914,0.00022026434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981697,0.000050207746,0.0004887078,0.0002741792,0.00065545493,0.0003617315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760073,0.00015190085,0.00041827717,0.00011564309,0.0016866965,0.000026744792],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023630199,0.00012267557,0.0005642426,0.00022158463,0.002060284,0.000010701152,0.0006224931,0.00003511996,0.000009658022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005249279,0.00010277528,0.00010051571,0.00047497026,0.087141134,0.0006231381,0.00039551232,0.00013202983,0.0000013340645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009671649,0.0000761541,0.00035825625,0.000095484334,0.000031333897,3.3061625e-7,0.48100606,0.0000013018489,0.0010958656,0.5166942,0.00010559722,0.0005257502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025285804,0.00013445868,0.0035309545,0.00006876466,0.000040092462,1.267861e-7,0.48015797,0.000014571106,0.005821151,0.50973135,0.00009046953,0.00015722368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004905378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080354634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08508085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007434785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003133312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034366862","doi":"10.1007/s11229-008-9327-5","title":"Entitlement as a response to I–II–III scepticism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Wright; Entitlement (fair division); Presupposition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of language; Transcendental number; Metaphysics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07563051157642947,"score_gpt":0.28572125980669727,"score_spread":0.2100907482302678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034366862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8067635,0.000093023074,0.00003121278,0.003415359,0.0007846986,0.00021102911,0.000020110621,0.000085381536,0.18859565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8347572,0.000017815304,0.00013928293,0.0016129952,0.00045074028,0.00003289025,0.0000024063238,0.000018205428,0.16296844],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989529,0.0001303611,0.00020442053,0.00021979454,0.00022119656,0.00027128664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991746,0.00022875839,0.000049653216,0.00033185937,0.000101805344,0.00011335179],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051695155,0.0001327882,0.00019514977,0.00010023773,0.0005419678,0.000034426153,0.00017925222,0.000048812544,0.005706685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028167063,0.000114839946,0.00010272569,0.000030978295,0.000340195,0.000082622,0.000090107904,0.00014445209,0.002346517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010021812,0.00054318405,0.00009064671,0.000041193227,0.00017156109,0.00019853254,0.45866323,0.000007223976,0.009338594,0.44527066,0.08065367,0.0040193186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022204625,0.00026569868,0.00012849046,0.000034758577,0.000021756066,0.000011539159,0.004732035,0.000003288378,0.0021741053,0.004115627,0.98810166,0.00018900873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000463236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004254827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.907448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035438432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007912135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034894669","doi":"10.1177/0048393114550807","title":"Experts within Democracy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Rationality; Enthusiasm; GRASP; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Politics; Computer science; Theology","score_opus":0.12972467962030537,"score_gpt":0.3181099485397181,"score_spread":0.1883852689194127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034894669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2600937,0.000100123754,0.000013171507,0.039556857,0.00265944,0.000115556606,0.0000065827294,0.000040718114,0.69741386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956832,0.0000024336177,0.000053132233,0.0013878512,0.0019226501,0.0000025410634,2.4752353e-7,0.000004193901,0.00094375794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991099,0.00015063865,0.00016466415,0.00013991751,0.00028944373,0.00014542481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995102,0.00011622641,0.00017981058,0.000107195396,0.00006727674,0.00001924706],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006841354,0.00007666852,0.00014595136,0.000024899959,0.0016911753,0.0000503557,0.0004932825,0.000034783312,0.00006320685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118476986,0.00004639645,0.00013353417,0.00005766469,0.003841779,0.00014263918,0.00006610947,0.00009042329,0.000010791946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017453009,0.000021096836,0.00020778968,0.000010590528,0.0000063678644,3.1781436e-8,0.047395524,0.0000021810868,0.00006843113,0.9514009,0.0006147459,0.00027063242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066773995,0.00004487773,0.00026821566,0.000014874215,0.000012926852,2.1761801e-7,0.0020516687,0.000026695641,0.00036236594,0.98461217,0.012458371,0.00008083669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001757237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016765812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7355895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000073052925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038659113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035535055","doi":"10.1163/221057012x627249","title":"Characterizing Skepticism’s Import","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Study of Skepticism","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Normative; Philosophy; Contextualism; Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.11097615490415554,"score_gpt":0.3498976499892086,"score_spread":0.23892149508505306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035535055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96372724,0.00035229826,0.00041249607,0.0029269715,0.018881863,0.00049312535,0.000060099836,0.000025301986,0.013120605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888652,0.000046555026,0.000074557676,0.0006080625,0.0059655863,0.000025820917,0.0000062513504,0.0000224183,0.004385566],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854094,0.000057713438,0.000534035,0.000100978,0.0004932278,0.0002731205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983351,0.00041576487,0.00043965745,0.0001581461,0.00057667645,0.0000746115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011775858,0.00014248106,0.00023176699,0.000109857894,0.0004908217,0.00013082603,0.0005694303,0.000036686026,0.0002985812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013509022,0.00009334107,0.00022418208,0.00001699025,0.0002253432,0.00038322638,0.00007738941,0.00032037398,0.000027173606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037248168,0.0033400531,0.007279194,0.0000400461,0.0036870483,0.000018211174,0.49961576,0.000025925392,0.0020071578,0.45334435,0.009439393,0.020830376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035403394,0.0012621265,0.0223854,0.00012451297,0.0007469188,0.00022433186,0.1535503,0.0001588849,0.0006303958,0.020513186,0.7963231,0.00054048916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000122030535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009586779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7868837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040672116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029163373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38063383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037679592","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300003103","title":"Précis of<i>Philosophy and Its Epistemic Neuroses</i>","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05332798940969196,"score_gpt":0.2550589167077141,"score_spread":0.2017309272980221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037679592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50256324,0.1687518,0.00008797289,0.048913434,0.018247154,0.0011205492,0.0027100788,0.00016048782,0.2574453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98453933,0.0042086253,0.000049428887,0.0015271476,0.0022853932,0.000013131072,0.0000614901,0.00004573036,0.007269698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843085,0.00016655681,0.00047580345,0.00036428805,0.00018395309,0.00037857908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988803,0.00025593714,0.00023848306,0.00028725562,0.00019805816,0.00013996099],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030068532,0.0002804946,0.0005105748,0.00008923821,0.0003188905,0.00006180213,0.00018571476,0.00025274744,0.0000735222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013460242,0.00029035058,0.00018676234,0.00006113653,0.0013760842,0.0002355528,0.0000827604,0.0004502462,0.00015660713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023560213,0.0002027822,0.00009158425,0.0008942701,0.000067365305,0.00003675812,0.012253607,0.000024646299,0.00038155273,0.9848771,0.00056212617,0.00058463926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013359115,0.0005373004,0.00034074966,0.00052467897,0.00024423047,0.00004913452,0.00042394004,0.000010993953,0.0017512914,0.70926565,0.2850299,0.00048620848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010618637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005236902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48197615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033856428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012605479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041414122","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0149.2006.00402_4.x","title":"ALL THE WAY: SUBSTANTIVE SOURCE‐HISTORICISM FOR SEMI‐COMPATIBILISTS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Books","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Historicism; Computer science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Library science","score_opus":0.09671095972440064,"score_gpt":0.2774603926611459,"score_spread":0.18074943293674528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041414122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.107755974,0.0029609173,0.0021753032,0.098028116,0.0044682594,0.0021000006,0.0003033085,0.0006483972,0.7815597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774736,0.0000070597403,0.000057078545,0.0032402375,0.005896555,0.00007307749,0.000046368288,0.000043347434,0.013162653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854124,0.000103439175,0.00037601878,0.0003480766,0.00025312518,0.0003780752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984884,0.00068698695,0.00015301754,0.00038054655,0.00022166372,0.00006936445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040275737,0.00023498798,0.0003283244,0.000044933648,0.0006022494,0.00009452526,0.0003022034,0.00012496779,0.00008621601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006731472,0.00016140685,0.0002675706,0.000020287174,0.0009825403,0.00008202991,0.000047390487,0.00042841808,0.000068628084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042046075,0.00010333474,0.000028732513,0.00003399158,0.000045721285,0.0000030646781,0.006899987,0.0000070126534,0.00009226459,0.9840802,0.008394959,0.00026866316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002492743,0.00005869081,0.0000440892,0.0000092640485,0.000055016786,0.0000015458393,0.00012536312,0.00008537016,0.00009025863,0.5312455,0.46788815,0.00014746342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039660573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007120732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86971766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006573049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032599015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.658198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042031934","doi":"10.1007/s11098-008-9303-4","title":"Advice for fallibilists: put knowledge to work","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy of language; Pragmatism; Philosophy; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of science; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.3403526572243801,"score_gpt":0.3724533458028709,"score_spread":0.032100688578490855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042031934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21424893,0.043592203,0.0003365919,0.29108208,0.010032457,0.003176908,0.00025184487,0.0015022897,0.4357767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778567,0.00033705376,0.000508242,0.0038393438,0.006262464,0.00028311255,0.000008892704,0.000038703278,0.010865519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869466,0.0000633083,0.0003284908,0.00039094823,0.00015837901,0.0003642294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982169,0.00082535413,0.000064289496,0.00025506824,0.00051239494,0.00012596053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027378314,0.00023047261,0.00048612157,0.00006001441,0.00095244707,0.000028270397,0.00021993247,0.00007715846,0.00004223532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056766014,0.00018224011,0.00019641047,0.000075983466,0.0009698038,0.00009249989,0.00014608423,0.00023548194,0.00031877452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088841756,0.00023413404,0.00018160127,0.0001578404,0.00024813288,0.0000070348374,0.060854595,0.000002700883,0.0000057098973,0.8996213,0.03789518,0.0007029359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035817924,0.00022916392,0.00018696698,0.000058896243,0.000059445087,0.0000020851476,0.0013449476,0.0000032791081,0.000019314873,0.38434142,0.61311406,0.00028224572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020009937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034307988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76360774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049626924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030136216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74315363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042069495","doi":"10.1007/s13164-012-0118-z","title":"On Robinson’s Response to the Self-Stultifying Objection","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Philosophy and Psychology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Qualia; Philosophy of mind; Premise; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Psychology; Metaphysics; Event (particle physics); Philosophy; Consciousness","score_opus":0.09678687586879149,"score_gpt":0.3562124627010008,"score_spread":0.25942558683220934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042069495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085015796,0.26197404,0.00009812034,0.15168583,0.008336203,0.0018562162,0.00007622128,0.00016397986,0.4907936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92439365,0.02776721,0.000110501256,0.045523997,0.0017181578,0.000051574385,0.000005328149,0.00001839694,0.00041119303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998733,0.00056179496,0.00026531558,0.00016469907,0.00009229069,0.00018289045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908376,0.00034242278,0.00013017624,0.0003080041,0.000071154485,0.00006450536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001568875,0.00012258714,0.00028434987,0.00006032185,0.00020387257,0.000008878366,0.000120984994,0.00005954784,0.00018177486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013087965,0.000079205034,0.00009887413,0.000049303715,0.00017352376,0.00007241909,0.00002204592,0.00021767685,0.00015130482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021484875,0.00022909262,0.000058338424,0.0017231612,0.00007283419,0.0000010916825,0.015684716,1.955769e-7,0.000072679904,0.95799255,0.017342081,0.0066084135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018910751,0.00037824336,0.0006841709,0.00088943803,0.00007228032,0.000018415612,0.000103091996,2.991298e-7,0.000011522821,0.01878609,0.9787492,0.00011814711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008214987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000081724875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9614071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009579328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011155882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32298875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044703139","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0061","title":"Promises to the Self","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Epistemology; Reflexivity; Negativity effect; Philosophy; General interest; Contemporary philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.06033349264577125,"score_gpt":0.24681202057070065,"score_spread":0.1864785279249294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044703139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0884015,0.0020620828,0.00002838957,0.34081352,0.004390936,0.0003727448,0.000061144776,0.000028871673,0.5638408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835891,0.0000073061988,0.00010898655,0.010830958,0.004498324,8.7435325e-7,7.1607735e-7,0.0000081243115,0.0009555863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934125,0.000051635354,0.00022290368,0.00006953461,0.00011368836,0.00020097815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905944,0.000038014925,0.00011445273,0.00014777016,0.0002597529,0.00038059393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002937321,0.00008921128,0.00015726867,0.00013565247,0.0003476375,0.000113861504,0.00030724434,0.00003290393,0.000200354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069316724,0.000058754853,0.00011391111,0.000038395858,0.00013617711,0.00012388306,0.0000034509262,0.000267839,0.00007613588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073550113,0.000018841603,0.00005120744,0.000008333297,0.000045522982,0.000059733353,0.032826785,0.00001002077,0.000011799367,0.92982584,0.034915544,0.0022190015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116956275,0.0002699081,0.0003082773,0.00003277487,0.00003245004,0.000026994263,0.00037615406,9.748733e-7,0.00002735623,0.22546482,0.77326053,0.00008280954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000553311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01795149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8951876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045998753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005385844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049149587","doi":"10.1353/cjs.2004.0043","title":"What do We Know about Knowledge? An Essay on the Knowledge Society","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heaven; Adam and Eve; Ignorance; Immortality; Tragedy (event); Paradise; Wife; Philosophy; Happiness; Cartesian anxiety; Sociology; Law; Environmental ethics; Aesthetics; Political sociology; Theology; Epistemology; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.07506628568583118,"score_gpt":0.2962703891615365,"score_spread":0.2212041034757053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049149587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5067212,0.19291854,0.000038077655,0.20137262,0.01924301,0.0005155036,0.00006034282,0.00004439097,0.07908633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821904,0.003802353,0.000016441436,0.003796041,0.00405008,0.0000060430793,0.000002811699,0.000030813044,0.006105042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828076,0.000606228,0.000376446,0.00015622283,0.000100341764,0.0004800056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795306,0.0006295781,0.0002914488,0.00033179767,0.00049789733,0.00029623916],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001969563,0.00020359406,0.00035517087,0.00007591265,0.0017846804,0.00025092094,0.000739034,0.00023167448,0.00050856627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097408025,0.0001120284,0.000355324,0.000039844042,0.004380352,0.00027036085,0.000021918993,0.0013324863,0.00020555808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005784129,0.000034658133,0.000021105698,0.000010441469,0.00011743752,0.000006670794,0.36539418,0.00001766414,0.000006652842,0.6238364,0.006411925,0.004137063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034142172,0.00030084932,0.00015004644,0.00020057661,0.00006903451,0.00003435014,0.06750628,0.000003770336,0.000020882298,0.29566067,0.6355691,0.00014303689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015232938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21338643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6291571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000359975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028008684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049365968","doi":"10.1007/bf02380929","title":"Causes and causal explanations: Davidson and his critics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of language; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.11287014455721103,"score_gpt":0.2881848383726581,"score_spread":0.1753146938154471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049365968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4930629,0.017915845,0.0000930756,0.029803678,0.0029986014,0.0005699247,0.00025214575,0.0002895132,0.4550143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99579686,0.00040589884,0.0001596794,0.001226717,0.0005776391,0.000012204071,0.000011323163,0.00001674102,0.0017929218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993473,0.000067655616,0.00015004961,0.00018475117,0.0000980553,0.00015216773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952424,0.00013672926,0.00004078072,0.00013391052,0.000093706745,0.00007062951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015751884,0.00011958585,0.0001581838,0.000059671063,0.00031548072,0.000090928086,0.000043155378,0.00005328086,0.00013003981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001395647,0.00011131434,0.00002336979,0.000015905309,0.0004959591,0.0001760522,0.000018136796,0.00014444324,0.000021810052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021999995,0.00003033254,0.00042482166,0.0000490884,0.0000226551,0.000005689378,0.0076895794,1.6010137e-7,0.000035040597,0.9901802,0.0014505759,0.000109672874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002866626,0.00008054721,0.00025553876,0.000024104536,0.00007259393,0.000017211922,0.0012763449,0.00000818494,0.00014257956,0.6516735,0.3459605,0.00020220113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006925322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032079036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50273395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010266456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022666542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45392668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050757252","doi":"10.1080/05568641.2011.634242","title":"Reflective Knowledge and Epistemic Circularity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Papers","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy","score_opus":0.15729763265796753,"score_gpt":0.29259332251921844,"score_spread":0.1352956898612509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050757252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0462952,0.0010103039,0.0000059986205,0.004043456,0.0005773149,0.00015585723,0.000013391951,0.000111045454,0.9477874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969551,0.0000741076,0.000080959755,0.00100749,0.00083674025,0.000016697944,0.000005247346,0.0000216008,0.0010020313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897397,0.0001371122,0.0002072864,0.00032992926,0.000107688946,0.0002440132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933285,0.00013574977,0.00006210769,0.0002226227,0.00010707228,0.00013962881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002650386,0.0001733091,0.00026124556,0.00005113278,0.00032202186,0.000029475983,0.00013801895,0.0001304576,0.0004349188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000087743494,0.00014940467,0.00010677925,0.00003094895,0.0012354939,0.00010729112,0.000062352265,0.00044937307,0.00013074314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025111818,0.000110166184,0.00027822022,0.00005768609,0.0000597564,0.0000080024565,0.028623845,2.1038517e-8,0.00031645017,0.9697348,0.000070505404,0.00071542314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003012039,0.00013899046,0.001756312,0.000027786771,0.000067704874,0.000009308792,0.0006406451,0.0000054424663,0.00008279057,0.96967983,0.02704262,0.0002473747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011223481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002900179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95065993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030483028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034391767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60925454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051649935","doi":"10.5840/logos-episteme2014536","title":"What is the Permissibility Solution a Solution of? – A Question for Kroedel","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logos & Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.07862813190076014,"score_gpt":0.30829293183202927,"score_spread":0.22966479993126915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051649935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4750083,0.010002188,0.22154224,0.155292,0.030518845,0.0089562,0.00051838177,0.0010140899,0.09714773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885271,0.00008190722,0.00025918675,0.0011738527,0.00093806157,0.00009022722,0.000042868636,0.000019372334,0.008867417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848366,0.0003187323,0.00042780137,0.0002998914,0.00019054621,0.00027938286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843943,0.0003905409,0.0002847161,0.00046215227,0.00037576692,0.000047382997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00179285,0.00016260894,0.00028834085,0.00004148304,0.0005330118,0.00012026744,0.0002002003,0.00012074867,0.000072863884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018991707,0.00011764294,0.00023512199,0.000029036133,0.0007820818,0.00040259672,0.000040108273,0.00017513451,0.000030161107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068117115,0.00013326395,0.00016724809,0.0004303405,0.000049188395,1.4810651e-7,0.023949075,0.0000052709297,0.0011445795,0.9591562,0.0044794637,0.010417104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010249696,0.0006270531,0.0012536049,0.0003331319,0.00026489436,0.0000053213603,0.005013747,0.013345094,0.001849789,0.46566996,0.51015157,0.0004608831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005326217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015806598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5135188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005241324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051191015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.479734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053724899","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x09000703","title":"Carruthers' marvelous magical mindreading machine","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Introspection; Confabulation (neural networks); Psychology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Theory of mind; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.128628256594198,"score_gpt":0.34023540806842895,"score_spread":0.21160715147423095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053724899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.958436,0.00045616616,0.000009067437,0.006166515,0.00038881483,0.00008605924,0.000018679715,0.00004945721,0.034389216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99042505,0.000009203937,0.0002131262,0.0014102989,0.00026825783,0.0000020918692,0.000003991662,0.0000034628636,0.007664521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999111,0.000050974417,0.00014683748,0.00025278982,0.00019058994,0.00024779874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999691,0.00006686288,0.000048365426,0.00008003221,0.00003589732,0.00007782353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004604082,0.00011478751,0.0001581111,0.000058327325,0.0005943887,0.00023345421,0.0001675994,0.000045141558,0.00028021864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017388968,0.00007940877,0.000053127667,0.000049155486,0.0012709505,0.00021614245,0.00002510986,0.00013278984,0.00001900267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024784944,0.0003814997,0.009507005,0.000019140945,0.000008502444,0.00005622189,0.06162354,0.0000011905236,0.0023922129,0.7237641,0.004877477,0.19734429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021943606,0.0056863073,0.0611041,0.00020091375,0.00025354468,0.00021072094,0.0483957,0.0004375239,0.0015118143,0.17918333,0.6983443,0.0024773867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004281839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061714865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69346684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006873547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026055463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46828705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056414158","doi":"10.1007/s10670-007-9055-0","title":"The Two Faces of Evidentialism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Ontology; Philosophy of science","score_opus":0.061620227689477364,"score_gpt":0.31269785326664845,"score_spread":0.25107762557717106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056414158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43618703,0.0047361464,0.00049415336,0.0028472764,0.0060507343,0.0002779669,0.000030710577,0.00010676362,0.5492692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722863,0.00010741458,0.000051936982,0.0002837828,0.00091578765,0.000002824822,0.0000029020762,0.00001084763,0.026338203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992197,0.000054607917,0.00024692097,0.00010444534,0.00016927,0.00020503961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905026,0.00043121897,0.00012435754,0.00022739428,0.00013282092,0.00003392054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009873098,0.00008185014,0.00013425293,0.000031458312,0.00039458307,0.000066529836,0.00020583556,0.00003304572,0.00024486423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007134498,0.00005365882,0.00009943518,0.000022978496,0.00071938656,0.00009182792,0.000036223075,0.0001429898,0.00007068087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001688254,0.000028015664,0.00023761125,0.000022684379,0.000057052872,0.000002828428,0.0265865,0.0000010509957,0.0003291188,0.958348,0.0074940794,0.0068762028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019304277,0.0000446939,0.0005267709,0.000018322306,0.000034872995,0.0000013143086,0.0058294507,0.000005809364,0.002187712,0.032962862,0.9580959,0.00009923501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006418634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006811392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9506018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000080968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021164042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38009167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056506274","doi":"10.4000/etudes-benthamiennes.673","title":"Utilitarianism and Egoism in Sidgwickian Ethics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d’études benthamiennes","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical egoism; Utilitarianism; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07928877958811302,"score_gpt":0.2681040817411833,"score_spread":0.18881530215307024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056506274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90139997,0.0017306623,0.000018585877,0.0066492604,0.0011820737,0.0005415834,0.000028013925,0.00012361266,0.08832622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99309784,0.0004168884,0.0002085469,0.0008534843,0.0005406069,0.00005520989,0.000018762334,0.000031543404,0.0047771083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985558,0.000163388,0.00036585235,0.0003754172,0.00014644848,0.00039312523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988195,0.0005089045,0.00010061052,0.0003081172,0.00015389349,0.0001089767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052703917,0.00022716212,0.0003515361,0.00013239963,0.00027682175,0.00016843042,0.00020040173,0.00022338735,0.00046026285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020641659,0.0002111659,0.0000889701,0.000047833022,0.00064743235,0.00039642234,0.00009721983,0.00072548195,0.00016257766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035888222,0.00010852789,0.0014304746,0.00023455519,0.00002837234,0.000009990933,0.07552444,0.0000023761495,0.00015568573,0.9200219,0.00022294887,0.0022571424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016723872,0.0004935201,0.040192157,0.00084666547,0.00013915723,0.00004818128,0.083191015,0.0006439108,0.00028361924,0.30493045,0.56594545,0.0016134874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031623922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024532793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61509144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034771456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004839451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99326694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058766829","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-2567.2009.01037.x","title":"Epistemic Supervenience and Internalism: A Trilemma","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Supervenience; Trilemma; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.042286531527206475,"score_gpt":0.26228032594042844,"score_spread":0.21999379441322198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058766829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84349906,0.0007769651,0.00010883609,0.0038075363,0.0014217944,0.00013371064,0.000019072528,0.00010789787,0.15012513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893166,0.00005189868,0.000040051156,0.0011009569,0.00080481847,0.0000029450307,0.0000032616053,0.0000068941945,0.008672578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993384,0.00008508052,0.00016462269,0.00015934232,0.00008445034,0.00016813798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956393,0.000110632245,0.000050819956,0.00017141418,0.000051807532,0.00005138824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039238468,0.00010263104,0.00017431223,0.000036582274,0.00014947675,0.00008241957,0.00014293795,0.00004161169,0.000293139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004817632,0.00008227679,0.00005633767,0.000015969443,0.0003974263,0.00013489374,0.000020814627,0.00015766948,0.000064959204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024703933,0.000021285394,0.000038077906,0.000011839746,0.0000093561885,0.000005036537,0.024588007,9.6997255e-8,0.00025860165,0.97067624,0.0006433738,0.003723371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036402402,0.00020669303,0.00030276037,0.000049052935,0.00002745933,0.0000170929,0.0020611554,0.000016364422,0.000279163,0.8969666,0.09954522,0.0001644332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011390756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009975075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14581755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009913538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000140073225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33551502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061227443","doi":"10.7202/004996ar","title":"Les arguments transcendantaux et le problème de la justification de la normativité morale","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.28823844220432837,"score_gpt":0.3745171775598076,"score_spread":0.08627873535547925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061227443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08928533,0.047925677,0.0018931234,0.18512161,0.0007682815,0.0007387637,0.0004425807,0.0004304564,0.6733942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818217,0.008172638,0.0011484448,0.001931598,0.0017748078,0.000067652305,0.000038590497,0.000056734887,0.0049878294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971433,0.0016058919,0.00037655098,0.0002869813,0.00018241585,0.00040484642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876624,0.0005371906,0.00019264464,0.00026497786,0.000119261174,0.00011968354],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011890258,0.00028809835,0.00031891617,0.00009464619,0.0005455106,0.0002668206,0.00023078441,0.00034231332,0.0002866782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007737877,0.00030797484,0.00018357272,0.000037819533,0.0019284297,0.00050565216,0.000025790116,0.0007461008,0.00009151084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013544688,0.00088672905,0.00029667106,0.00050642906,0.000097966265,0.000018686405,0.043577004,0.000024678737,0.0006970203,0.9450091,0.005416884,0.0034552766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005672821,0.00013135262,0.00092761026,0.00026747235,0.00018720626,0.000038729337,0.00096579944,0.00087238254,0.0022268016,0.5544595,0.4389407,0.00041514108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019961384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018336417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8925364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013262036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084861844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065056736","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqv014","title":"Moral Deference and Deference to an Epistemic Peer","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Morality; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.24432780029377044,"score_gpt":0.31490333800443804,"score_spread":0.0705755377106676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065056736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8249231,0.00017332273,0.0001333824,0.12856796,0.00068009336,0.00031376525,0.000053992884,0.00014329924,0.04501105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943308,0.0000024262947,0.000107626125,0.0026523287,0.0013627011,0.000027431968,0.000012910044,0.000021441308,0.0014822826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984503,0.0002504547,0.00026656664,0.0003391513,0.0003706106,0.00032295362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985686,0.00016671028,0.00006812686,0.00048312102,0.0003478171,0.0003656481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007145525,0.00020839072,0.00027450235,0.000048237365,0.00029497387,0.00021385985,0.00041435557,0.00009215759,0.00006164575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008840524,0.00013967685,0.00005838907,0.0000423965,0.0008064244,0.00023557717,0.000044097553,0.00043431876,0.00032828766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049680337,0.00005706258,0.00010988862,0.000011884905,0.000014973861,0.0000044446338,0.070434384,0.0000012484807,0.000033719298,0.92664737,0.00041218568,0.002223173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002659814,0.0012223179,0.0002943193,0.000019371142,0.000038806003,0.000014634473,0.0045457077,0.0000716644,0.000008095673,0.9855041,0.007786875,0.00022815686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029901776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007415824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16940773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020889125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055524706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5695856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065190707","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2006.00326.x","title":"UNDERDETERMINATION AND THE ARGUMENT FROM INDIRECT CONFIRMATION","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Underdetermination; Argument (complex analysis); Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Medicine","score_opus":0.0314890652546003,"score_gpt":0.230720348990048,"score_spread":0.1992312837354477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065190707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7532151,0.0006783305,0.0012233732,0.0049660266,0.0008351091,0.0003721027,0.0000325702,0.000070256465,0.23860717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951286,0.000011755239,0.000028703033,0.00034583046,0.00048732123,0.000013199977,0.00004760357,0.000003811582,0.003933205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995643,0.000104163846,0.00011354424,0.00006996293,0.000095217,0.00005280718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964553,0.00015332077,0.000065792505,0.00007310677,0.000054831402,0.0000074135337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025252,0.000049286868,0.000077885314,0.000016112563,0.00021801113,0.0001201468,0.00003192598,0.00002439724,0.00011596403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014402203,0.000032913198,0.00002107966,0.000006928754,0.00024856857,0.00010340078,0.000007534724,0.00005885179,0.000023981767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062640283,0.000013311007,0.000070159076,0.000004994918,0.00001281389,2.1590895e-7,0.0167157,0.000008075133,0.00006322903,0.98016787,0.0011682353,0.0017691118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023732663,0.00004032222,0.006581761,0.000023665394,0.0001656734,0.0000013852776,0.0047204234,0.004489779,0.002493795,0.7555738,0.22331002,0.00022607067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092133286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035728468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24191351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011614898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012260293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19937323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070710280","doi":"10.1163/174552412x628940","title":"Reasons, Answers, and Goals","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.11053687137056291,"score_gpt":0.27941504007924994,"score_spread":0.16887816870868705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070710280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70098263,0.01962352,0.000029569273,0.022373572,0.0053640385,0.00016556059,0.00004060243,0.000038839553,0.25138167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912278,0.00018943497,0.00033208902,0.0011082281,0.0063917795,5.562006e-7,0.0000012950917,0.000013382699,0.0007354197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991807,0.000082161045,0.0002967577,0.000062728126,0.00018700624,0.00019069375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992161,0.00008010291,0.0002860836,0.000102041806,0.00015806788,0.00015761459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005560718,0.00010936179,0.00026875903,0.00008217278,0.00013961706,0.000052314503,0.000106338324,0.000054892076,0.00012848612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055297885,0.000081931365,0.0001225054,0.000017776465,0.00032756405,0.00053082017,0.000024912102,0.00031485673,0.000023044795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048153433,0.00012983596,0.0065957694,0.00004943133,0.00009761672,0.000012184196,0.00918242,5.0565825e-7,0.00008143555,0.9712343,0.011322628,0.0012456838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008147326,0.00044915013,0.0037365763,0.0001267677,0.00018853563,0.0001455591,0.0014141083,0.0000021723522,0.00014048244,0.5504528,0.44224995,0.00027911575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014496457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000056628173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43092734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014047503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023159328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33410642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072056355","doi":"10.4148/biyclc.v5i0.288","title":"Intellect and Concept","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition Logic and Communication","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Individuation; Intellect; Epistemology; Extant taxon; Relevance (law); Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.056173331945422934,"score_gpt":0.28337148216393493,"score_spread":0.227198150218512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072056355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08916417,0.003249514,0.0009848212,0.022131339,0.00029373038,0.0003448354,0.00002851201,0.000060566126,0.8837425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957385,0.0006870759,0.00014153548,0.0015629056,0.00009219862,0.000004830944,0.000032771677,0.0000027138299,0.0017374472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995425,0.000093484625,0.00015334788,0.000067217195,0.00009164338,0.000051825693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999333,0.00023406211,0.000104851446,0.00012996008,0.00018336377,0.000014748177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023114038,0.00005642875,0.00008339595,0.000032403423,0.00015480617,0.000037822727,0.00014934652,0.000027459188,0.00019475493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006578765,0.000041103445,0.000024093853,0.0000108147005,0.0006114884,0.0000910854,0.00003743661,0.000119899,0.000009357516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020184541,0.000031924726,0.000007188332,0.0000035650653,0.000023098168,1.0239977e-7,0.007887426,7.055332e-7,0.00011348059,0.9834024,0.00031022675,0.008199723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048459286,0.0001844197,0.0018170417,0.00008619348,0.00006811567,0.000010260256,0.0042643687,0.00054966676,0.00035526222,0.9556416,0.036416814,0.00012166269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030198336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019333038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90657437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000062046697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001021808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22530547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074407027","doi":"10.1080/00201740310002406","title":"Interpretation, Reasons, and Facts","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Coherentism; Intentionality; Doxastic logic; Epistemology; Appeal; Relation (database); Objectivity (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Nothing; Philosophy; Slogan; Subjectivism; Perception; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Foundationalism; Linguistics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08846054933456955,"score_gpt":0.2984510055341341,"score_spread":0.20999045619956458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074407027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50413847,0.002065046,0.00074744364,0.0008349583,0.0037360017,0.00016160004,0.000011509443,0.00012149635,0.48818347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933518,0.000043836073,0.00011043583,0.0008340364,0.0002889718,0.0000051302495,0.0000045558263,0.00000892346,0.0053523113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995259,0.00007462989,0.000106657026,0.00012190816,0.000060492126,0.000110393004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964917,0.00009603507,0.00003970399,0.00011358229,0.00006181612,0.000039694507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001844533,0.00007057035,0.00009900432,0.000029917308,0.00016272675,0.00006216385,0.00004171457,0.00003880347,0.00022306519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001298409,0.000061627106,0.000027085807,0.000010231566,0.00045012278,0.00012836512,0.000010403975,0.00010564023,0.00007524051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042882148,0.000018792862,0.0004963018,0.000023517641,0.000019071791,0.000002480225,0.09130542,4.8059036e-7,0.000019304598,0.90043133,0.0056576235,0.0020213795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020170535,0.000056365017,0.000687622,0.000031715153,0.000024384657,0.0000073997085,0.013696972,0.000008470627,0.00021338393,0.058359556,0.9265532,0.00015924184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035193218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019469642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9208956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006725941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017600712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25130805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075114051","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2265.2009.00484_12.x","title":"An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. By Dan O'Brien","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Heythrop Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Foundationalism; Skepticism; Internalism and externalism; Philosophy; Coherentism; Event (particle physics); Externalism; Subject (documents); Morality; Computer science","score_opus":0.037927122745135336,"score_gpt":0.28893753080564333,"score_spread":0.251010408060508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075114051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75161374,0.004471735,0.003072836,0.16269988,0.00757832,0.00048655385,0.000030871175,0.00008891147,0.06995719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98429644,0.00007153624,0.000030633993,0.0011306199,0.008443175,0.0000015714646,0.0000029039984,0.0000109776865,0.0060121305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883175,0.0004812002,0.00024353298,0.00010784452,0.00015208524,0.00018357763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991454,0.00009295997,0.00014594043,0.00033219703,0.0002192884,0.00006420155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001832178,0.00010065778,0.00015463393,0.0000360569,0.00082735874,0.000111810616,0.00036594062,0.00003318909,0.0002998017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069135196,0.000050238854,0.000084719904,0.000039366554,0.00051269936,0.00016306905,0.00001821724,0.00044587516,0.00003707607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006018276,0.00015313797,0.000009613003,0.0000049595865,0.00004588074,9.199261e-7,0.11406321,0.000024204708,0.001663309,0.7591867,0.09385493,0.030932989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017494363,0.000589482,0.00030885576,0.000013798824,0.0000695021,0.000074781776,0.020354798,0.000016793623,0.0014328932,0.10511078,0.87174,0.000113368056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012931331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007899407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7778851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020185353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041599807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63634586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075522519","doi":"10.1007/s11229-010-9713-7","title":"Clarity about concessive knowledge attributions: reply to Dodd","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Attribution; Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Pace; Psychology; Metaphysics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06596993155315543,"score_gpt":0.319403231354713,"score_spread":0.25343329980155754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075522519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3650507,0.0008102265,0.00017108524,0.00828977,0.0075283996,0.0005672689,0.00035586863,0.000309789,0.6169169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96770555,0.000016909042,0.00018043243,0.001866574,0.001928563,0.00006156548,0.000015590289,0.000020150215,0.028204652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892485,0.00011318611,0.00024275552,0.0002957211,0.00012134856,0.00030212486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984507,0.00045551552,0.00008837784,0.0004761212,0.00038501018,0.00014426843],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058172824,0.00015472386,0.00025121015,0.0000639762,0.0004682404,0.00012327607,0.00027373058,0.00011722739,0.001709486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091779046,0.00013115343,0.000117939715,0.000045845736,0.00072238874,0.00016161618,0.00007985946,0.00059534115,0.0014560581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014236549,0.00013124132,0.00031469474,0.00004189162,0.000041363804,0.000005956146,0.028718151,2.897612e-7,0.0010272831,0.94575065,0.020793831,0.0031603877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113130416,0.00004490647,0.0008391415,0.000041428644,0.00003096573,0.0000029813343,0.0021731188,0.0000067653723,0.0010599985,0.015238941,0.98025006,0.0001985608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058173656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061551067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9594562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021325282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010873036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078167306","doi":"10.1111/j.2153-960x.2012.00564.x","title":"Pragmatic Encroachment and Belief‐Desire Psychology","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytic Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Citation; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.10028205910449957,"score_gpt":0.3185657902363977,"score_spread":0.21828373113189814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078167306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060390398,0.0035369545,0.00012493438,0.009498422,0.0014497981,0.00029315718,0.000026758962,0.00011768464,0.9245619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913566,0.000105228624,0.0001530664,0.0045223306,0.001923572,0.000016228325,0.000016987262,0.00001886677,0.0018870813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989204,0.00009757891,0.0002676786,0.00021756599,0.00014918874,0.00034759057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992567,0.000115837705,0.00011427478,0.0003114104,0.000058146907,0.0001436361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042515938,0.00017578769,0.00029365456,0.00010157287,0.00024982498,0.000044596614,0.00012952567,0.00007866319,0.00032262004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003827443,0.00014817981,0.00009237183,0.000037431608,0.00059200655,0.0002365266,0.00004631893,0.00022778306,0.0002554108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066758844,0.00016947393,0.0008716716,0.00008089743,0.00011556482,0.000002654044,0.009171264,2.3643581e-7,0.000021057307,0.9870506,0.0014769249,0.0010330155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005414718,0.00017801646,0.0016907739,0.000046524787,0.00027008314,0.000021473099,0.0005988676,0.00004637884,0.00002425902,0.8422365,0.15398829,0.00035731425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032257914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017537144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93096626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017554703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016071017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6042597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080486303","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00137.x","title":"Knowing‐How and Knowing‐That","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Brown University","keywords":"Intellectualism; Epistemology; Need to know; Order (exchange); Statement (logic); Bit (key); Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Political science; Computer security; Business","score_opus":0.17355371187974125,"score_gpt":0.26546582326489543,"score_spread":0.09191211138515418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080486303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14970477,0.0027912161,0.00013333124,0.028347617,0.0029257867,0.0003745815,0.00005314881,0.0003830337,0.8152865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98961157,0.00014156154,0.00010711346,0.0012482462,0.0023573304,0.00001531057,0.000014146132,0.000029757814,0.0064749895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893403,0.00008757214,0.00016739544,0.0003068293,0.00021291264,0.0002912417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917465,0.00021677295,0.00009001924,0.0002893602,0.000109922694,0.00011926342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001549647,0.00022082441,0.00035458396,0.000090878224,0.0007088782,0.00010116559,0.00018752598,0.000073320865,0.00010895112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003419756,0.00020064245,0.00012928041,0.000030199493,0.00096713804,0.0002938765,0.00007757745,0.00031867708,0.0001206295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015826921,0.00011032596,0.0008758249,0.00008946334,0.000087014756,0.00003918362,0.021805102,0.0000012248917,0.000049139522,0.9671826,0.008886993,0.00085731613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056241505,0.00011031903,0.0006195257,0.00004925306,0.000048042162,0.000027532584,0.00065048947,0.000072874245,0.00019872621,0.177064,0.82021594,0.00038089202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000065284934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006350896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83990675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019277935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002983266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8181962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081718739","doi":"10.3758/s13423-014-0683-5","title":"Knowledge and luck","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation; Wake Forest University; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Luck; Attribution; Psychology; Social psychology; Relation (database); Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.052838008806889165,"score_gpt":0.2934667803510117,"score_spread":0.24062877154412254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081718739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015491544,0.31324884,0.000045912027,0.016577993,0.0019748942,0.0003859965,0.00000761165,0.000085937514,0.6661237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14121595,0.61415803,0.0013305508,0.061313786,0.008922117,0.00030083876,0.0000540371,0.00018870964,0.17251596],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895376,0.00018291303,0.00032598214,0.0002913836,0.00004666957,0.00019928509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922204,0.00017474011,0.000123695,0.00033697337,0.00006006416,0.00008251091],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008139027,0.00016690891,0.00041810077,0.0000270642,0.0001661808,0.00005150827,0.00016540056,0.000045754525,0.0030459724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006521393,0.000139797,0.0001161102,0.000013966331,0.0003237221,0.00002788039,0.000037953625,0.00020065357,0.0036369727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003994042,0.00005980404,0.000033451946,0.0024309685,0.000033513512,2.6871444e-7,0.0018591972,2.9834283e-8,0.0000034532482,0.37974268,0.51519215,0.100640476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018498348,0.00003962411,0.00005306287,0.00092643156,0.00006345117,0.000003885354,0.00004810035,0.0000027359845,0.0000014067552,0.003325919,0.9951786,0.00017179908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034326527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060924132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4936077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010808089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013010918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081725103","doi":"10.1163/187226311x582301","title":"Re-enacting in the Second Person","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Ascription; Operationalization; Epistemology; First person; Order (exchange); Medieval history; Point (geometry); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; History","score_opus":0.21465460513159007,"score_gpt":0.24942458198128184,"score_spread":0.03476997684969177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081725103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21358629,0.0033383083,0.0000016658718,0.0036317818,0.0030600063,0.00007522939,0.0000039945326,0.000003898749,0.7762988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99475527,0.00001124091,0.000044848508,0.0012268063,0.0010560473,6.9571206e-7,8.538986e-8,0.000008667964,0.0028963657],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999103,0.00021617312,0.00031732183,0.000058658923,0.00020671492,0.00009809247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887353,0.0001381599,0.0006467807,0.0002027765,0.00011820226,0.000020567839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009720098,0.00008060942,0.00020635017,0.00008536791,0.00011627179,0.000005638119,0.00045510597,0.0000395713,0.0005512448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006582119,0.00004456441,0.0002524185,0.000016527176,0.00053538114,0.00015675786,0.000016419213,0.0005650941,0.0000044109565],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000831032,0.00024045027,0.0003586489,0.00013296018,0.00008735512,0.000018379604,0.7254184,0.0000010082896,0.0003778698,0.25273147,0.020355947,0.000194399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082576775,0.0005566918,0.002449851,0.0003062531,0.00017418753,0.000056677265,0.06219488,0.0000036505585,0.0005333698,0.25365794,0.6789971,0.00024365891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007710176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004366582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78116894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010170006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007253581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6035744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082214600","doi":"10.1086/392929","title":"Science, Biases, and the Threat of Global Pessimism","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Criticism; Race (biology); Order (exchange); Affect (linguistics); Population; Epistemology; Positive economics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.10292833158159341,"score_gpt":0.30666339277004234,"score_spread":0.20373506118844892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082214600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5790119,0.0006353582,0.0000109508255,0.003767072,0.00042670002,0.0001066125,0.000015630643,0.000012418055,0.41601336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913305,0.000094423216,0.00008553129,0.00029302642,0.00019761616,0.0000017967967,2.1828086e-7,0.0000021682063,0.00019215829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988132,0.000025998504,0.0002024055,0.00023072698,0.00051830494,0.00020935023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902403,0.0001409184,0.00014936429,0.00026238515,0.0003591038,0.0000641834],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014227654,0.00008302779,0.00019080946,0.00009239749,0.0007198111,0.00006412908,0.0005956503,0.000017569362,0.000028714025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024938333,0.0000503608,0.0000499012,0.0004121284,0.058207713,0.0004254912,0.00012785054,0.00007968168,0.0000032003684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001810662,0.000033612203,0.0008039557,0.00001413554,0.000003238757,5.761795e-7,0.0043132063,0.000002072987,0.00031565502,0.9938314,0.000016921684,0.0006471446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000552989,0.00012652655,0.0033654307,0.00006637269,0.00002737676,0.000010568817,0.0013605877,0.0001785594,0.00071618037,0.99107754,0.002405485,0.00011235246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026078685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005191855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42012116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001701363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002566473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9443553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084171255","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00497.x","title":"Critical Notice of Robert C Roberts and W. Jay Wood, <i>Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Citation; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.3215027559344425,"score_gpt":0.37207324825664984,"score_spread":0.05057049232220734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084171255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30186883,0.0027073582,0.000062230756,0.0021169025,0.00020411854,0.00042333134,0.000040286403,0.00004444867,0.6925325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980613,0.00029356807,0.00038245102,0.00030343063,0.0003142314,0.00003644465,0.000008063678,0.000019345522,0.00058116013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967138,0.0012621485,0.00046894467,0.00060885085,0.00033425822,0.0006120072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99561673,0.0033417768,0.00006564217,0.00032238022,0.00041744675,0.00023604903],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00206154,0.00023299249,0.00054831477,0.00026721306,0.0003930708,0.00006192767,0.00030545643,0.0002684662,0.0006700656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016107142,0.0001820326,0.000056395584,0.00013706135,0.0070229825,0.0003286707,0.0002791983,0.0010551374,0.000021784897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037410116,0.00055192097,0.0002866354,0.00013482013,0.000031887583,0.000026977406,0.091897935,4.481554e-7,0.000057889374,0.904871,0.000021085258,0.0017453267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046730225,0.0022546572,0.00043001384,0.00007026548,0.000018862944,0.000009764464,0.0063710185,0.000054174,0.00010797229,0.9877139,0.0022700862,0.0002319807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004276443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003029927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69619244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034503795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000659031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085234070","doi":"10.1007/s13347-012-0088-1","title":"Book Symposium on Expertise: Philosophical Reflections By Evan Selinger Automatic Press/VIP, VINCE INC. PRESS 2011","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Technology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of technology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of science","score_opus":0.07134869010974274,"score_gpt":0.3006192835595315,"score_spread":0.22927059344978876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085234070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015397766,0.098357,0.00039427035,0.24715465,0.009143091,0.0026783023,0.00054471806,0.0066247806,0.61970544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819039,0.0010628186,0.00017458248,0.0062436224,0.0037689842,0.0005298356,0.000055018914,0.00012466402,0.0061365482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735683,0.00019183916,0.00061684015,0.0006237243,0.0003607292,0.00085004803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981071,0.00019481052,0.00028591606,0.0010006509,0.00021568379,0.00019588912],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002985641,0.00048713718,0.00060140004,0.0002927589,0.00071895274,0.00007338315,0.0006392149,0.000646921,0.00064614567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008421503,0.0004474967,0.00017974041,0.00007109379,0.0016163819,0.0004933248,0.00021882201,0.0012250452,0.0007168927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004219283,0.0010373106,0.000029533072,0.00014184325,0.00021378776,0.0000068181466,0.0065981885,0.0000037279308,0.0030488272,0.9164554,0.07176469,0.0006576911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045355555,0.00047056377,0.0000043762743,0.00007597543,0.00015396553,0.000025017074,0.00012241324,0.0001106976,0.004322206,0.14999856,0.84371126,0.00055141724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013816856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021970724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9665062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001422399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039593808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089261701","doi":"10.1007/s11406-012-9395-0","title":"Sure the Emperor Has No Clothes, but You Shouldn’t Say That","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Absurdity; Assertion; Utterance; Emperor; Philosophy of language; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Philosophy of mind; Focus (optics); Metaphysics; Linguistics; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.2419071922481962,"score_gpt":0.2869433213110515,"score_spread":0.045036129062855285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089261701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13146198,0.009891902,0.000031989268,0.10809873,0.011719526,0.0007977718,0.00025802228,0.00043596816,0.7373041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96740836,0.00007451697,0.000034427685,0.0054227514,0.011268958,0.000032996664,0.000025740266,0.00005133781,0.015680928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985853,0.00017183939,0.00022984059,0.00022914611,0.00029288858,0.00049102004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988254,0.00023876494,0.00012561918,0.00055693404,0.00013024751,0.00012304724],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063722895,0.0002531337,0.00028534723,0.000044166718,0.0008345337,0.0001728707,0.00037956162,0.0001262414,0.0012914976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007362783,0.00016176038,0.00019972926,0.000025462927,0.001077822,0.00033470365,0.00008146861,0.00048190507,0.0015565014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025132902,0.00015177426,0.001730546,0.00005417889,0.000112511734,0.0000024115768,0.03129718,4.6830007e-7,0.00015327895,0.94300675,0.023143908,0.00032182934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021738744,0.000057327554,0.0008071083,0.000019589166,0.00009699161,0.0000056521117,0.0013850532,0.0000033717677,0.00026205182,0.07703933,0.91984123,0.00026488403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031111503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021448272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89669734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026296773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004425108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091924307","doi":"10.1007/s11098-009-9459-6","title":"In support of anti-intellectualism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dalhousie University; University of Arizona; Arizona State University","keywords":"Intellectualism; Epistemology; Action (physics); Philosophy of language; Philosophy of mind; Need to know; Metaphysics; Relation (database); Descriptive knowledge; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.18983973861417305,"score_gpt":0.35220347464032226,"score_spread":0.1623637360261492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091924307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3702985,0.005402691,0.000011931635,0.31899548,0.0020021605,0.00038924275,0.00004800067,0.00012627724,0.3027257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992412,0.0004947272,0.000023109966,0.005367169,0.000861805,0.0000045507545,0.0000024907258,0.0000068570016,0.00082733174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990422,0.000060427097,0.0003495274,0.00018208407,0.00016324043,0.00020249416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993445,0.0002443996,0.00007775091,0.0001433498,0.00015697614,0.00003299366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002698035,0.00013282869,0.00045788934,0.000079936,0.00010945082,0.000010993568,0.000125159,0.00005492087,0.00021128106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026362823,0.000104315,0.00010264862,0.000047534344,0.00077403797,0.00009438859,0.00004024108,0.00023543902,0.00004989585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016625512,0.00017024821,0.000061384875,0.00004129381,0.000058389593,0.000014742173,0.036395036,9.894575e-7,0.00008796289,0.95698947,0.005934156,0.00022969415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025878305,0.00027505535,0.0002555523,0.00002103052,0.000025958152,0.0000018720579,0.00091562764,0.0000018526973,0.0003461123,0.92150337,0.07625895,0.00013585296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029141545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008835614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62211347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016153894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014939678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42538422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092885606","doi":"10.7202/011874ar","title":"Introspection, déploiement et simulation","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Introspection; Epistemology","score_opus":0.3392743951598934,"score_gpt":0.40782064332993007,"score_spread":0.06854624817003668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092885606","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074525415,0.039032925,0.0020235672,0.67895263,0.0048928657,0.0005551997,0.00015006305,0.00040946808,0.26653075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9169278,0.0029758178,0.00083578005,0.016489502,0.034693323,0.000026777147,0.00005366805,0.000055346954,0.027941959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983757,0.00024975068,0.00046275617,0.00034143115,0.00024448335,0.00032588383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880326,0.0002175481,0.00020198239,0.00029675322,0.0003795134,0.000100951576],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055418466,0.00027298884,0.00030435275,0.00010169953,0.00045505888,0.00018602543,0.0001390482,0.00018402087,0.0013207038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080501326,0.00028524446,0.00017636037,0.00003207065,0.0006489721,0.0006733267,0.000055140095,0.00047535409,0.0006978597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020961692,0.00033984237,0.0000847741,0.000110358924,0.000103559476,0.0000027257631,0.01269987,0.0023850945,0.000022247306,0.9629633,0.017669551,0.0035977433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020477315,0.00013543355,0.00008704369,0.000069734866,0.00007404806,0.0000015301847,0.00015556463,0.0014644931,0.00013788418,0.3445765,0.6528831,0.00020990796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042867145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009200984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90947527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020904906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057075722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094094968","doi":"10.7202/1026681ar","title":"Value Monism, Richness, And Environmental Ethics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Pluralism (philosophy); Value pluralism; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Value theory; Anthropocentrism; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03679093419942407,"score_gpt":0.24592093855210054,"score_spread":0.20913000435267648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094094968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8205633,0.0017455011,0.0035568182,0.007199111,0.0011871052,0.000337233,0.000067011955,0.0002615532,0.16508235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895767,0.0005694132,0.0005470704,0.0059828637,0.000553521,0.000013498096,0.000024886585,0.00003207151,0.0026999947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987939,0.00034750768,0.00018326618,0.00024298562,0.00015034,0.00028199342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992035,0.00037860533,0.000082406936,0.0002123743,0.000024719462,0.00009840133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008798778,0.00017106843,0.00020679114,0.000040085022,0.0005249916,0.000101069854,0.0001407204,0.0003421511,0.00009187026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011292484,0.00015834703,0.00007055079,0.0000117377385,0.0010135183,0.00010597158,0.00006111361,0.0010237165,0.00004206409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009793764,0.000037673875,0.0013694819,0.00008348099,0.000034143286,0.0000049154737,0.04426191,0.000024028608,0.0005498746,0.9516285,0.00033881376,0.0016573868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005430764,0.00019435612,0.001171004,0.000061837134,0.00009413498,0.000025098067,0.014096473,0.0011092706,0.0014053629,0.35168362,0.62905604,0.00055970816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041708906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025288505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62871724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045035078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030396275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6457205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098052878","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i1.3938","title":"In Defence of Virtue: The Legitimacy of Agent-Based Argument Appraisal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh; Florida Institute of Technology","keywords":"Virtue; Argumentation theory; Ambiguity; Argument (complex analysis); Fallacy; Epistemology; Legitimacy; Criticism; Philosophy; Epistemic virtue; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05033415478823391,"score_gpt":0.2871719785788954,"score_spread":0.2368378237906615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098052878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5824277,0.00011727496,0.00093490904,0.0009697456,0.0011936162,0.0003107749,0.000030622465,0.000029397785,0.413986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980613,0.0000042495026,0.00009952415,0.0012687364,0.000118220356,0.000012120848,0.000006089949,0.0000041407593,0.0004255897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992117,0.000060004895,0.00034570548,0.00007122272,0.00015854111,0.00015280202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991728,0.00032956243,0.00019587333,0.00019844259,0.000082144405,0.000021168125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005342911,0.00008889171,0.00018802554,0.00005236495,0.00006697954,0.000017061584,0.00021776064,0.000041685656,0.0001562192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011246732,0.0000568289,0.00008489016,0.00003034983,0.0006452851,0.00017137104,0.000037746115,0.00015669025,0.000030054616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027406935,0.00006360877,0.0006239799,0.000088963076,0.000009649456,6.473178e-7,0.006996478,0.00045719882,0.00007093606,0.9905099,0.00023695917,0.0009142667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036333613,0.0020776184,0.012310494,0.00023945962,0.00011603417,0.00000621612,0.012070461,0.0070618424,0.011157858,0.06910356,0.88143104,0.0007920554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027729548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002885826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9214063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000061467604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041491792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.237758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098137601","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.432","title":"In Defense of the Objective Epistemic Approach to Argumentation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":153,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Fallacy; Subjectivism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07432956683130892,"score_gpt":0.2587859281955193,"score_spread":0.1844563613642104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098137601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4906804,0.000035077548,0.00014686753,0.00016943889,0.0003754041,0.00025934362,0.000009329325,0.000013608847,0.50831056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99504596,0.000008725886,0.00010981556,0.0014912855,0.000091498856,0.000021804179,0.0000044308404,0.000004100886,0.0032223766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939,0.000044248878,0.0002364358,0.00007801343,0.0001122809,0.00013903051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996222,0.000050948496,0.000098411525,0.00013235083,0.00007473317,0.000021357715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017842896,0.00007633979,0.00013383932,0.00005807106,0.00013671706,0.000009601661,0.0001304775,0.00004286749,0.000028214357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042546402,0.00005040993,0.00006539878,0.000054191656,0.00029990554,0.00020325843,0.000040491515,0.00015126335,0.000030310128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030928346,0.0000709978,0.0021947261,0.000035762972,0.00001202251,0.0000012301484,0.1286229,0.000675933,0.000027291795,0.8679261,0.00029120233,0.00011089391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008481704,0.0027854315,0.29143438,0.00037012066,0.00024503903,0.00042513153,0.21555725,0.003381743,0.009444113,0.27798846,0.18681079,0.0030758532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032210327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024115073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5899376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002445225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003526954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20556574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098314264","doi":"","title":"Disaffiliation in associations and the ousting of John","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hts Teologiese Studies-theological Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4210701432112357,"score_gpt":0.36059742249420684,"score_spread":0.06047272071702886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098314264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8108718,0.047418635,0.000031650794,0.0050112917,0.0013550816,0.0008674616,0.000032581305,0.0002035416,0.13420795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98991114,0.007766988,0.00022666805,0.0003212834,0.00015805558,0.0001114778,0.0000022383228,0.000007940281,0.0014942363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980685,0.00052983285,0.00058574625,0.00030341203,0.00017313998,0.00033934606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995067,0.003942477,0.0003652582,0.00020079705,0.00040300912,0.000021455055],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017874566,0.00022880123,0.00085198134,0.0000708267,0.00064274506,0.000013108697,0.00020901834,0.00009623024,0.00005854092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007778421,0.000117245596,0.00012911338,0.000099690136,0.0072043724,0.00011010961,0.00047462163,0.00032809295,0.0000079873835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008975949,0.00010158365,0.024518633,0.00006027477,0.00054312486,0.0000055611717,0.17239547,0.0000043000036,0.000002962162,0.800527,0.0007416207,0.0010097582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018111503,0.00041738452,0.07615892,0.000083923995,0.0002664831,0.0000022335248,0.28716463,0.00003147806,0.000043781427,0.63134855,0.002328349,0.00034311676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023738688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023712986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1790393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004282965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014023705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99549747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099752566","doi":"10.1111/j.1520-8583.2009.00160.x","title":"MODERATE DEONTOLOGY AND MORAL GAPS<sup>1</sup>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Perspectives","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Deontological ethics; Citation; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.07834119569037902,"score_gpt":0.29021388256236574,"score_spread":0.21187268687198674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099752566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48324734,0.0066953762,0.00010103361,0.14139158,0.0002872883,0.0003549459,0.000044017776,0.00032454677,0.3675539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945798,0.00019168011,0.00020058884,0.0021396892,0.0020491423,0.000009131488,0.0000063191824,0.000018254063,0.0008053969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998592,0.00014164204,0.00023854618,0.0004902054,0.0001701703,0.00036743373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992122,0.0001299484,0.00006702866,0.00024265371,0.00019845397,0.00014971476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018738456,0.00025193224,0.0004187777,0.00009619487,0.00044251385,0.00011866296,0.00015741253,0.00015004004,0.00024094661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000119591445,0.0002171121,0.0001237123,0.00003571155,0.001356321,0.00026558296,0.00003806574,0.00053382956,0.000054312142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089739886,0.00017852022,0.000049875704,0.000012763052,0.000047808473,0.00001847431,0.058545284,0.000024014118,0.000033321194,0.9401955,0.00021016772,0.00059452676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004940045,0.00036556748,0.0006103591,0.000014182153,0.000048289243,0.000019635076,0.0072029997,0.0009709534,0.000022202115,0.9862311,0.0037370457,0.00028364305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006102837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054211767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51133245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038080485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003283357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88535744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099848887","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-2567.2007.tb01210.x","title":"Evidentialism and the Numbers Game1","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02890549949402321,"score_gpt":0.2690204381239677,"score_spread":0.24011493862994449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099848887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21687278,0.0013982571,0.0003383965,0.0024199176,0.00447873,0.00022912906,0.0000070022434,0.00009003291,0.77416575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98007894,0.000066032946,0.000021545413,0.0011716841,0.0017125346,0.0000029451137,0.0000018204605,0.000009878231,0.016934598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994045,0.000106544074,0.00013703507,0.00009967225,0.00009445521,0.00015777379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917394,0.0005174605,0.000055912198,0.00017081253,0.000049417566,0.00003247349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017759743,0.000075747994,0.00013028746,0.000019786874,0.0002643557,0.000084463856,0.00010955282,0.000037016587,0.00038621458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073729534,0.00004556382,0.000056330904,0.000013007917,0.0013892277,0.000077825935,0.000031863186,0.00015392237,0.00009179704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006142754,0.0000065958516,0.000020452579,0.000008964772,0.000026363079,0.0000018018076,0.051845215,6.4541034e-8,0.00001397557,0.9454647,0.0014589749,0.0010915038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005924037,0.000013935938,0.00008310728,0.000010550735,0.000048231563,0.0000034612638,0.006059543,0.0000025177608,0.00006586591,0.663734,0.32930672,0.00007966142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044025303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009563979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7632062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005692976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000933403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51186675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100332354","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12147","title":"Intuition Fail: Philosophical Activity and the Limits of Expertise","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Skepticism; Philosophical methodology; Philosophical theory; Cognition; Philosophy of mind; Psychology; Philosophy; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.3433338980840962,"score_gpt":0.3786579380425524,"score_spread":0.03532403995845618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100332354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.331673,0.0016717577,0.00016321673,0.06421942,0.00017012648,0.00051272154,0.000021079059,0.00005200153,0.60151666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978066,0.00051450083,0.0000255098,0.00043348913,0.000978252,0.000055556535,0.0000031082898,0.000010108761,0.00017286818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739945,0.0013543016,0.00022468495,0.0003308227,0.00036795498,0.00032276308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683815,0.0024891237,0.000072509996,0.00026205365,0.0002234078,0.000114766124],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025994624,0.0001439151,0.00036018412,0.0000931035,0.00072745513,0.00008859013,0.00021540764,0.00013605207,0.00012465379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089207274,0.000083568084,0.00006637793,0.00006487875,0.0070300167,0.00013628161,0.00019524667,0.00095087226,0.000015896345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040445055,0.0001065966,0.000018456718,0.000075430056,0.000029803085,9.542672e-7,0.011606845,3.338669e-7,0.00012500524,0.97724944,0.00002605483,0.010356642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008589537,0.0006093961,0.00010255283,0.00002441289,0.000013097225,0.0000018821937,0.000590094,0.0001558085,0.00005330465,0.9926794,0.0048074936,0.000103576895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000095277865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002429828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6661336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014232451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001686383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101406057","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.008","title":"Lay denial of knowledge for justified true beliefs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":275,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Denial; Psychology; Attribution; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09085125245716436,"score_gpt":0.2885738848519348,"score_spread":0.19772263239477045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101406057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4604806,0.0007257055,0.002512596,0.0010705135,0.004455566,0.0016345587,0.0003854016,0.00017115539,0.5285639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98958635,0.000012063392,0.00014402744,0.00016898575,0.0012639477,0.00011552839,0.00013391061,0.000013257561,0.008561913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994945,0.000034743553,0.00017882054,0.00011270962,0.000053931755,0.0001253194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913484,0.00019026473,0.00008138958,0.00008758401,0.00047570898,0.000030200008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012595154,0.00007684844,0.00014553759,0.000045173045,0.00014930981,0.000030801515,0.000059386333,0.000064476386,0.00057200895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084556494,0.00006963796,0.00008576009,0.000014527336,0.0002487845,0.00013212673,0.000012589626,0.00007709978,0.00025028683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007302384,0.0005051342,0.000040008763,0.0009604529,0.00014051823,6.1461685e-7,0.0629989,8.833109e-7,0.0127631305,0.8323508,0.04754686,0.042619657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032492578,0.0007155359,0.0010158569,0.0002649788,0.0004957256,0.0000031266661,0.008185548,0.00026238538,0.04017959,0.4905284,0.45448452,0.0006150511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033271626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032826245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5291058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000067247393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002834582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6263097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104601679","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2009.tb00088.x","title":"The Solution to the Surprise Exam Paradox","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surprise; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Wright; Epistemology; Psychology; History; Social psychology; Medicine; Art history","score_opus":0.06441762251572031,"score_gpt":0.26277322146600063,"score_spread":0.19835559895028032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104601679","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27110875,0.008787474,0.0007975605,0.5853437,0.0056479755,0.0007728939,0.00006770995,0.00007501486,0.12739888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98804486,0.00007683127,0.000019661895,0.0036486727,0.0058821463,0.0000019614706,4.958425e-7,0.0000140395705,0.0023113575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985874,0.00035677594,0.000389162,0.00008763932,0.00034509282,0.00023390255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859744,0.00034026202,0.00035935955,0.0003729593,0.00026049613,0.00006949247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019629523,0.00013875174,0.00019219136,0.000036563422,0.0012099528,0.00016854428,0.0007250511,0.00004004518,0.000051649124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010976202,0.000055368117,0.0002541106,0.000046054833,0.0004587052,0.00008927285,0.00003131737,0.0005457606,0.00024533932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027328066,0.00011382716,0.000026751011,0.0000074872705,0.0001924332,0.000010373417,0.20571364,0.00011362303,0.0001632869,0.76778156,0.010171498,0.015432242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026373073,0.00036641932,0.000116406714,0.00004134703,0.0001057289,0.000027516608,0.0075103743,0.000012517321,0.000040666248,0.74939555,0.24199976,0.00012000364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025865957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009962217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7169361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020943253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045640558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9306101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105313662","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6253.2012.01747.x","title":"Replying to Armour:Certainty and Exceptionalism: Threats to a World-Humanities?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Chinese Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; Certainty; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Sociology; Natural (archaeology); Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.1138904025636839,"score_gpt":0.32557878138412694,"score_spread":0.21168837882044303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105313662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8441334,0.0019499788,0.00018861164,0.026893929,0.0031400495,0.000295107,0.000032399723,0.00003987922,0.12332666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97649294,0.000028193575,0.0005491641,0.0080740405,0.011725868,0.000007842016,0.0000027196345,0.000031278483,0.003087979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855375,0.00010055297,0.00053017936,0.00014788086,0.0003652025,0.0003024581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855816,0.00022063234,0.00029934398,0.00020214655,0.0004019206,0.00031779308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082633283,0.00022632544,0.00046259217,0.0004218285,0.00032080547,0.00013527616,0.00020047989,0.000043360218,0.00035677382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017372145,0.00016449888,0.00019148657,0.00009136095,0.00017291833,0.000555423,0.00008542101,0.00038257908,0.00006405107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023991565,0.0002627526,0.006274869,0.00011817541,0.00020854146,0.000021920489,0.09815723,0.000027754662,0.0002801037,0.8873905,0.00554344,0.0014747921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063838763,0.00035519034,0.010361544,0.00019251526,0.000094641495,0.00011950216,0.0008972901,0.0000041862177,0.000022285263,0.79781616,0.18910629,0.0003920013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027727643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014199934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18356284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051670893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034516383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67080694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105991975","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2010.01636.x","title":"Mental Causation: The Mind‐Body Problem. By Anthony Dardis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Citation; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Library science; Epistemology; Computer science; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.035612631576947065,"score_gpt":0.2596950115166866,"score_spread":0.22408237993973956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105991975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1620361,0.0014102699,0.000064886626,0.052676927,0.0076398677,0.0010742432,0.00061813,0.00018024456,0.7742993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860576,0.00003656136,0.0002302861,0.0017231202,0.0026898386,0.000061351784,0.0001274437,0.000035255576,0.009038578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986036,0.00013761922,0.00031907466,0.00032274256,0.00033205614,0.0002849296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998994,0.00013430622,0.00015829652,0.0005015165,0.00012942782,0.00008248844],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006001584,0.00023153255,0.00027595676,0.000059316353,0.00081634714,0.00018922462,0.00035795284,0.000103829836,0.0015060249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035330886,0.00015362405,0.00020165117,0.000055286335,0.0011431137,0.00024613316,0.000069754766,0.0006120664,0.0003717797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001649804,0.00019317049,0.00017949895,0.000029218154,0.0002202842,0.0000037530383,0.024079993,3.0180934e-7,0.009249816,0.91824,0.046140276,0.0016472092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026358227,0.00007184895,0.00006675027,0.0000073782244,0.00011579019,0.0000061595097,0.0007711876,0.0000123145155,0.0020290553,0.11383385,0.8825939,0.00022816792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014835509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004522151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8364536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000121312505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040282608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107055168","doi":"10.1017/s0012217313000681","title":"Interests, Disagreement and Epistemic Risk","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Order (exchange); Subject (documents); Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03619910133377254,"score_gpt":0.2299125579139815,"score_spread":0.19371345658020894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107055168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91879797,0.00079233554,0.00008812159,0.0020981242,0.001582471,0.00034188238,0.00008511709,0.00008582884,0.07612813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99363923,0.00018076085,0.00004309671,0.0005609626,0.00062476227,0.000036132806,0.000035733454,0.000012517717,0.0048668026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930483,0.000087851564,0.00017537121,0.00017429091,0.000075627046,0.00018201301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946845,0.00013834632,0.00008018433,0.00018293157,0.000063281324,0.00006679925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016893733,0.00011198284,0.00016301058,0.000033394033,0.00019195692,0.00011551258,0.0000966899,0.00004746765,0.00059407036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005698503,0.00008886055,0.000051865787,0.000009879703,0.0004470884,0.00014193806,0.000055263303,0.00018078125,0.0005635947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000080999625,0.00010371692,0.012495888,0.00009899769,0.00010637059,0.0000038462276,0.058104485,7.4605214e-7,0.00013191937,0.88279104,0.025086261,0.021068636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009334318,0.00029861106,0.026322309,0.000097563076,0.00013157858,0.0000060108578,0.009767338,0.000108472384,0.00018263786,0.4160395,0.54548156,0.00063099357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003448617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00453126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5203953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000131572915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010930989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7244057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107553779","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2006.0011","title":"Motivating the Relevant Alternatives Approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Core (optical fiber); Philosophy; General interest; Positive economics; Contemporary philosophy; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.06275002607445239,"score_gpt":0.22920596469630186,"score_spread":0.1664559386218495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107553779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104557306,0.0025688217,0.0002945681,0.015892744,0.0021670256,0.00015691498,0.000048887447,0.000013401197,0.87430036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918875,0.000006137617,0.00024306677,0.00075407216,0.005579225,0.0000013193595,0.0000031948919,0.00001614682,0.0015093462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911535,0.00010045542,0.0003286612,0.00008771695,0.00014974394,0.00021809936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905926,0.00011762455,0.00029231035,0.00013448978,0.00025629043,0.00014000906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042095926,0.000109342625,0.00018322257,0.00013328182,0.00047382148,0.00012620976,0.0003025014,0.000036187455,0.00011195812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008115703,0.00007114364,0.00014095656,0.00003502535,0.00063630816,0.00017116156,0.0000074672776,0.0004121873,0.000013633312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002789626,0.000015150295,0.0004144072,0.000017581473,0.000044750872,0.000029547142,0.010596881,0.000066405395,0.000020222953,0.9846395,0.003806288,0.00034646367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027591523,0.00009795984,0.0006567796,0.00006886926,0.00004523523,0.000058995938,0.002198339,0.000043259846,0.000066787696,0.78811055,0.20821558,0.0001617395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061683045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011064079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8873302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050168583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027858504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9324672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110946410","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00015.x","title":"Agent Reliabilism, Subjective Justification, and Epistemic Credit","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Order (exchange); Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0411197691073327,"score_gpt":0.23919623394467543,"score_spread":0.19807646483734273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110946410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9097751,0.0037121044,0.00015417165,0.025584262,0.0019260067,0.0002477078,0.000087314336,0.000037634127,0.058475696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919937,0.00003958069,0.000047804606,0.00029015358,0.0052206665,0.0000024468904,0.0000027153228,0.000021041842,0.0023818898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889994,0.0001809889,0.00043709733,0.0001157419,0.00022507139,0.00014117567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986428,0.0002102355,0.00048990984,0.00020770806,0.00040202524,0.000047303078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000815785,0.0001323985,0.00023248118,0.000067102155,0.00033906943,0.000074956704,0.00023050944,0.000051527673,0.0000846759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058713387,0.00008200703,0.00014588563,0.00003063309,0.00081525784,0.00011000142,0.000024307486,0.00036837623,0.00005743995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009507983,0.00011779534,0.0005098401,0.000065745815,0.0001220657,0.0000102804415,0.077906474,0.000046101133,0.00043361317,0.9182264,0.0020334483,0.00043313848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038639567,0.00015281989,0.0004164334,0.000061573526,0.0001634159,0.000045132692,0.0069996254,0.000008785628,0.0001016737,0.9640473,0.0274847,0.00013211227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010355818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056120985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0822186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029034032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044474717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33441496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113518045","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i3.455","title":"Evaluating Inferences: the Nature and Role of Warrants","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Inference; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14724920243985806,"score_gpt":0.32551370930484225,"score_spread":0.17826450686498418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113518045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8165363,0.0008614536,0.0000026548544,0.00012928256,0.00020059466,0.00008143543,0.000008828907,0.000017991944,0.18216142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979647,0.000095710784,0.00007915656,0.00076482253,0.00017167225,0.000004685205,0.0000042689903,0.0000029374662,0.00091204996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994368,0.00003302025,0.00018277479,0.00006138386,0.00014512087,0.00014088077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949706,0.0001404888,0.00010735599,0.00011093697,0.00012245333,0.000021701759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033216606,0.00007419189,0.00012565329,0.00002371948,0.00033159545,0.000021432177,0.000120637254,0.00008015034,0.00012533109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010420762,0.000041529034,0.00003938949,0.000017692737,0.000643628,0.00019039451,0.000043595548,0.00030746812,0.000014435221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019441744,0.000020205363,0.0040063434,0.000048193764,0.00003102859,0.0000013619298,0.12417426,0.000022612916,0.000084021514,0.86386144,0.00013480643,0.007596279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022331718,0.002158696,0.08899248,0.0002109077,0.00019258424,0.00014932384,0.1058476,0.003231177,0.0021801894,0.40498996,0.38874325,0.0010706485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010352098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016975662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45887148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000026323155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004684318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25503978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114712101","doi":"10.1163/22105700-03031081","title":"How not to Argue from Science to Skepticism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Study of Skepticism","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08472458139384767,"score_gpt":0.3459477251552891,"score_spread":0.2612231437614414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114712101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9428281,0.000022692122,0.011746352,0.028439151,0.011381505,0.00065747835,0.0001122364,0.000021953812,0.0047905124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98806804,0.0000040653686,0.0006637277,0.002973467,0.003361817,0.000024596078,0.0000019807621,0.000017740138,0.00488458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814653,0.000056238692,0.00036888066,0.00023775572,0.0009312777,0.0002592967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972708,0.0007130555,0.00022530642,0.00026157117,0.0013841281,0.00014510295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013261598,0.00014950287,0.00024739964,0.00023773452,0.0007186582,0.0005635341,0.0014014412,0.000027220034,0.00006887625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008460105,0.00010054379,0.000144183,0.000054866374,0.00039508028,0.00025924793,0.00017976286,0.00025357358,0.00004224826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044849853,0.0010090265,0.00023180878,0.000010594119,0.0009306094,0.000009610444,0.3106797,0.0006887304,0.0091291275,0.62137514,0.011158954,0.044328205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036249228,0.0037560307,0.009876592,0.00019989123,0.00037829322,0.000026699965,0.110253215,0.0008839586,0.0048112166,0.1198835,0.74561065,0.0006950132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046421622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078253675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7344517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006214088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005378642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55274105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115206405","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3891","title":"Trudy Govier and Premise Adequacy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.054675651937541724,"score_gpt":0.24272749440630823,"score_spread":0.1880518424687665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115206405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30094922,0.00031214353,0.000018798832,0.0005954575,0.0004239056,0.00023137507,0.000009204801,0.00008000107,0.6973799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96906865,0.000050059283,0.00013176646,0.0024650304,0.00040836955,0.000031698735,0.000009759804,0.0000080273985,0.027826628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993632,0.000019689065,0.00020091815,0.00009877406,0.0000929891,0.0002244605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995627,0.000065235334,0.00006985623,0.00014156889,0.00008796134,0.00007268646],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013165677,0.000112481604,0.00014794509,0.000033567285,0.0001955229,0.00014803352,0.00010316049,0.00006702997,0.0021181954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003891857,0.00008185019,0.00004834995,0.000012991364,0.00036754736,0.00062153494,0.00005338193,0.00018789437,0.0007915541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008809922,0.000032661992,0.000560776,0.000074960444,0.000025769912,0.0000022260153,0.027144698,0.000003035366,0.000025510237,0.94998693,0.005137495,0.016997106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049448956,0.00023984099,0.005025121,0.000019105093,0.000029172828,0.0000102986105,0.005020151,0.00012440053,0.00006438491,0.054865986,0.9338066,0.0003004667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022411505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000114224604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9286691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006143211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001886732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121059243","doi":"10.1163/221057011x588037","title":"Pyrrhonian Skepticism Meets Speech-Act Theory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Study of Skepticism","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Mistake; Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Epistemology; Philosophy; Speech act; Key (lock); Linguistics; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08782809139287939,"score_gpt":0.3456985279878681,"score_spread":0.2578704365949887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121059243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8983159,0.0011752477,0.0013736531,0.005680635,0.03219764,0.0011048652,0.00012846295,0.000061203405,0.05996241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98531574,0.000073776566,0.0001796555,0.0005282336,0.005383828,0.000023469665,0.000004515874,0.00003200311,0.008458782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981857,0.00015822382,0.0005599681,0.00013357171,0.0006227665,0.00033978414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975897,0.0009541151,0.00043121222,0.00022503965,0.000698408,0.000101513135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020123804,0.00019182068,0.0002849776,0.00014514144,0.0006022212,0.0001551666,0.00080831436,0.00005438001,0.0005535362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026434893,0.0001238632,0.00029623034,0.000024099914,0.00042587254,0.00037033737,0.00009484087,0.00041308318,0.00005347027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003442813,0.0018449131,0.0010577124,0.000019574665,0.0024858685,0.000015645037,0.19483897,0.000038792637,0.00026520476,0.75230855,0.0056432034,0.041137286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038066702,0.0013314894,0.0075541385,0.00012487959,0.0008840376,0.0002384415,0.11375741,0.00010296698,0.0005624015,0.15201977,0.7190587,0.0005591261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013267512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002242431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71341544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057011668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040330076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60608333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121580608","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00006.x","title":"Self‐Knowledge Failures and First Person Authority<sup>1</sup>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Externalism; Utterance; Obstacle; Attribution; Self-knowledge; Task (project management); Psychology; Epistemology; Counterfactual thinking; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.3828202229710673,"score_gpt":0.35024837297055045,"score_spread":0.03257185000051688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121580608","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03274689,0.012621462,0.0000039096726,0.024584582,0.00012766887,0.0003802773,0.000041031653,0.00015838684,0.9293358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903426,0.0018633966,0.00013256825,0.00019763429,0.0017332075,0.000057839126,0.0000065614868,0.000020654814,0.0056454954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770766,0.00045931034,0.00022852878,0.000582754,0.00035069976,0.0006710466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807084,0.0010799413,0.000041544557,0.00027397866,0.0002549211,0.00027875218],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010849064,0.00024209757,0.0003690071,0.00019300655,0.0016986895,0.00029172673,0.00028420467,0.00022422263,0.0014064241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027845046,0.00018481108,0.00007443751,0.00011306772,0.002431786,0.00020920983,0.0002322651,0.0011740571,0.00029637286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025848669,0.00029950196,0.00012496761,0.00023171009,0.000055204513,0.000012968421,0.084955946,5.9697174e-7,0.0000016080579,0.91086036,0.0013471687,0.0020841223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045004944,0.00077453465,0.000043831908,0.000032931326,0.000021190492,0.0000063254247,0.006740786,0.0008603863,0.0000018374342,0.48031738,0.5104963,0.00025444818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008999869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000072184295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95759577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040354545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001637862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124662483","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i2.2868","title":"Why Fallacies Appear to be Better Arguments Than They Are","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Heuristics; Appeal; Defeasible estate; Epistemology; Jump; Scheme (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Psychology; Computer science; Positive economics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Economics; Law; Political science; Mathematical optimization; Physics","score_opus":0.06121604731127619,"score_gpt":0.2623205485938987,"score_spread":0.2011045012826225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124662483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6915356,0.000020070864,0.000023370816,0.0074806623,0.00182742,0.0002075246,0.00005563453,0.00011925206,0.2987305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9419584,0.0000051779825,0.00018488408,0.04780194,0.0008694744,0.000022757862,0.000022407796,0.000014125653,0.009120806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990464,0.00002087211,0.0002325659,0.0001443326,0.00020266157,0.00035319268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993492,0.000046806465,0.00010304815,0.00027978016,0.00012054325,0.000100629106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020985416,0.0001719948,0.00019975986,0.000074144715,0.00032258072,0.00019131269,0.00028581964,0.0000916744,0.0008169192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048653743,0.00012731289,0.000105674575,0.000019350688,0.00021549113,0.00036955715,0.000112438946,0.00042718204,0.0006867915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005028642,0.00011692911,0.005258008,0.00010781295,0.00010310374,0.000018992054,0.11007817,0.000016485188,0.00045651867,0.8544552,0.026873805,0.0024647461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016747692,0.0001180812,0.0017971705,0.00001158142,0.000014950011,0.000004289335,0.0044283797,0.000006182431,0.00019053662,0.008845823,0.98419774,0.00021778325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003314329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012235955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95732397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007238172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016766267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89446926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127214494","doi":"10.1111/j.1746-8361.2001.tb00222.x","title":"Ordinary Language, Conventionalism and a priori Knowledge","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"dialectica","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conventionalism; A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Entitlement (fair division); Character (mathematics); Face (sociological concept); Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05884641840765568,"score_gpt":0.3093620255155093,"score_spread":0.2505156071078536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127214494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3783794,0.0028587063,0.000035690184,0.001216861,0.0011698507,0.00013487421,0.0000114268405,0.00009799808,0.6160952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416397,0.00012580103,0.000059224523,0.00039637124,0.0012488842,0.00001296305,0.000012692006,0.000013824401,0.056490537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994531,0.00006706735,0.000112738984,0.00014842334,0.00006376384,0.00015486813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955684,0.00016535436,0.0000342609,0.00011168409,0.00007823685,0.000053616346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016092366,0.000085694264,0.00013273099,0.000047863425,0.00022188858,0.00006254366,0.00005684471,0.000044863038,0.0007930583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070228845,0.000077646066,0.000052013143,0.000029090445,0.00034885047,0.00008647757,0.000030551353,0.0001388163,0.00015740798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002142611,0.00013123716,0.0006168573,0.00005024308,0.00005184998,0.00003060623,0.05057333,4.5509598e-8,0.00012665361,0.935494,0.0073622474,0.0055414983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036193867,0.000088179935,0.001088456,0.000020497077,0.000046954287,0.00002696642,0.0018603768,0.000014867191,0.000047357935,0.027534323,0.9687597,0.00015034653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001295398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007511639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96139747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011532961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037504546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86834323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128594499","doi":"10.1007/s11229-013-0377-y","title":"Iffy predictions and proper expectations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of language; Successor cardinal; Philosophy of science; Metaphysics; Epistemology; sort; Philosophy of mind; Speech act; Philosophy; Connection (principal bundle); Process (computing); Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04550433135311171,"score_gpt":0.2389985798613773,"score_spread":0.19349424850826558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128594499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36771846,0.0005980877,0.00012941951,0.0047505773,0.0008806731,0.00047305317,0.000039639555,0.000191185,0.6252189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712499,0.000017588764,0.00012861259,0.00016317,0.00039430897,0.00011671195,0.0000037331993,0.00001076157,0.02791521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995632,0.000039724746,0.00010109338,0.00011527781,0.00006386454,0.000116841584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995887,0.000111304376,0.000027759732,0.00013023897,0.000094634706,0.000047310034],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005484262,0.000067628935,0.00008582272,0.000037691174,0.00027813044,0.00009520764,0.000051335937,0.000031737967,0.0014313832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007543845,0.000050634517,0.000030847652,0.00001243804,0.00038993088,0.00020595454,0.000018148734,0.00010200839,0.0004983356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030076935,0.0001260618,0.000542053,0.000051919407,0.00007858444,0.00000143177,0.1447963,0.0000016338594,0.00040337694,0.8328742,0.015935512,0.005185951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003954053,0.00018473624,0.0048498763,0.0001003456,0.00013147209,0.0000134692045,0.14315099,0.0006129039,0.0005529795,0.097939275,0.75152963,0.0005389368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041103875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039187836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7355941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000061260935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001620956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134720723","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i1.2236","title":"Revision and Immortality in Philosophical Argumentation: Continuing Thoughts on the Rhetorical Wedge","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Argument map; Immortality; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Philosophy; Fallacy; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12089603935311828,"score_gpt":0.31216809696240516,"score_spread":0.1912720576092869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134720723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85129434,0.00020958215,0.000017661618,0.005439448,0.00053494034,0.00021669414,0.0000046397836,0.000035500863,0.1422472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99590415,0.00014733225,0.000017170225,0.002037903,0.0010557587,0.000008354841,0.000008137466,0.0000044212456,0.0008167856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920046,0.00007894546,0.0002761017,0.00011866828,0.00014870375,0.0001770914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947745,0.00022641245,0.00008130684,0.00013192424,0.000045376084,0.000037524773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051575917,0.0001073326,0.00016043131,0.00003596405,0.00019451723,0.00009096124,0.00009581691,0.00006896708,0.0001342918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080869824,0.00006423016,0.00006083811,0.000035467798,0.0003047118,0.00023442792,0.000039642666,0.00032409752,0.00006618324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042573247,0.00003793115,0.0013128163,0.000015262105,0.00000763947,0.000012453289,0.011459697,0.0000023116088,0.0000038312833,0.98427284,0.00022072061,0.0026119044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014996938,0.00062248204,0.020525135,0.0002225417,0.000051442967,0.00005093194,0.0068687615,0.00029507503,0.00009764739,0.31989163,0.64932925,0.00054539455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026873795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009177451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66438127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016417227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000084080275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.261923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135187704","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i2.2891","title":"A pragma-dialectical response to objectivist epistemic challenges","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Objectivism; Epistemology; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Presupposition; Medicine","score_opus":0.06646282060450644,"score_gpt":0.28877686783745976,"score_spread":0.22231404723295334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135187704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42873535,0.00012501715,0.00004405139,0.009613239,0.0028280509,0.0003099981,0.000020415004,0.00021509899,0.5581088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98469484,0.000018036568,0.00029199294,0.0023980692,0.0011805544,0.00005197698,0.000004875983,0.000018317625,0.0113413595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987103,0.000114810704,0.0003153596,0.00022305899,0.00020799463,0.0004284736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867415,0.00052424584,0.00009087853,0.00035857293,0.00018224954,0.00016991558],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010869975,0.00019765114,0.00026600825,0.00013086463,0.00034880143,0.00013241667,0.00026179268,0.00016001193,0.00061357365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077766465,0.00016084345,0.00011729804,0.000041799827,0.00052454375,0.00030613563,0.000073580384,0.00069916574,0.0013526641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044078377,0.00007140832,0.00003200702,0.000050491853,0.0000245995,0.000028224063,0.039612316,0.0000025163974,0.0010213131,0.9537746,0.00060343253,0.004338313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036711188,0.0006778044,0.0019460982,0.00001972418,0.000021832164,0.00007706343,0.0037325188,0.000016785156,0.00030426725,0.018939734,0.97354966,0.00034738777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007777326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002067636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9729462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002083819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001282218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135214580","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716599","title":"Contemporary Skepticism and the Cariesian God","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Genius; Psychology","score_opus":0.06418901640702497,"score_gpt":0.2300197583400521,"score_spread":0.1658307419330271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135214580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03152107,0.015182329,0.000026871017,0.18600598,0.0019327572,0.00020588048,0.0000705675,0.000010843397,0.7650437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98936456,0.000026883154,0.00005105102,0.005324376,0.0039711157,0.0000011607268,0.0000015785427,0.000012876831,0.0012464211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992384,0.00010445413,0.00030644695,0.00007469844,0.00010387627,0.00017214104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990547,0.0001281988,0.00019273694,0.0001292557,0.00018915217,0.00030597262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047991134,0.00010551479,0.00025324806,0.00011666366,0.00040278744,0.00013157247,0.0001904644,0.000049840946,0.00020589984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007285838,0.00006949085,0.00011918013,0.000020247364,0.0017037565,0.00022286273,0.0000074592544,0.00036882926,0.000018452489],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020679416,0.0000057306097,0.000108260705,0.000012119777,0.000073295356,0.00003973757,0.02914672,0.0000018130595,0.0000015564074,0.9549938,0.014731981,0.0008643057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009343434,0.000072935974,0.000081435384,0.000038577517,0.000048361482,0.00006165908,0.0014162819,0.000008405907,0.0000086628115,0.25664094,0.74058676,0.00010161715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037963665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033768356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9578435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034682445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005552183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9838629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135933060","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i4.4077","title":"Virtue, In Context","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Virtue; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.057326803594014195,"score_gpt":0.2504277423336299,"score_spread":0.1931009387396157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135933060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27400243,0.00012084575,0.000013034476,0.00055921864,0.00056310825,0.00016275114,0.000004985326,0.00005134242,0.7245223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812332,0.000010354725,0.000029830859,0.0052027423,0.00023316417,0.000029389663,0.000008323452,0.000005338668,0.01324767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937856,0.00002077166,0.00023198868,0.00007673717,0.00008232412,0.00020962999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996343,0.00006555801,0.00005899341,0.00012265195,0.000078548495,0.000039893872],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014717954,0.000092086615,0.00014692983,0.00005978255,0.000092662485,0.00008829126,0.00012833573,0.000062771134,0.0021475437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034918605,0.00007026864,0.000052012878,0.00001920016,0.00027708744,0.00053034874,0.000035852274,0.00021573126,0.0026953402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042381184,0.000023232116,0.0005847187,0.000016456848,0.0000062538047,0.0000023870914,0.0135395955,0.000004091092,0.00000957847,0.9773186,0.0018800374,0.006610845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000706126,0.0002466582,0.007987743,0.000028854358,0.000008488774,0.00000508382,0.018055547,0.00018838691,0.000092207214,0.10273419,0.869603,0.00034371493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011457881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002370263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8745844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001054141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021562655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137091212","doi":"10.3102/0013189x13515746","title":"Knowledge and Responsibility","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Researcher","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.1868085660854804,"score_gpt":0.41032925948436905,"score_spread":0.22352069339888864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137091212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31809062,0.00079166266,0.000011975328,0.020896386,0.00081840967,0.00012435409,0.000014153328,0.000021610469,0.6592308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80396795,0.00001739558,0.00013380506,0.00027781414,0.0021818094,0.00002250658,0.00001734635,0.000008771147,0.19337259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999118,0.00031444497,0.00009755099,0.00016835128,0.00014741822,0.00015428914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811655,0.0013000768,0.000019540852,0.0001778698,0.00029483842,0.00009113268],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015508672,0.000056097946,0.00007711439,0.00005754632,0.00024377956,0.00006761532,0.000094872084,0.000034041914,0.002822962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015164545,0.00004758608,0.000026803804,0.000024399926,0.0007017381,0.00008780578,0.00004328502,0.00021136287,0.00035660787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014196981,0.000096501295,0.0011633642,0.00003415511,0.000008592259,4.6797023e-8,0.012577505,4.935997e-8,0.00003540949,0.93501407,0.048648,0.002408127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008175776,0.00003174855,0.030505566,0.000008662683,0.0000028121465,4.7574574e-7,0.00057397847,0.000017412323,0.000023696168,0.1611012,0.8075957,0.00005700285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018180982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010256392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77391285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026877133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026246897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139794519","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i2.2931","title":"Truth and Argument Evaluation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Falsity; Premise; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Logical truth; Criticism; Focus (optics); Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0797422625294547,"score_gpt":0.2921479428081424,"score_spread":0.21240568027868767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139794519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56611365,0.000053755844,0.000010325368,0.00025426858,0.001366848,0.00011840903,0.000005782649,0.000033127806,0.43204385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969749,0.000009857534,0.000108945285,0.00075759133,0.00045017299,0.000014542294,0.000015818301,0.0000035198973,0.0016646589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995073,0.000016885651,0.00013657012,0.00007325746,0.00013971228,0.00012623689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963933,0.000055647633,0.000057927133,0.00010368719,0.000106341526,0.000037057198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005095334,0.000069542555,0.00008337663,0.000031807896,0.00017430609,0.00007901562,0.00005724913,0.000052706982,0.0008513974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074090916,0.000052139683,0.000028342578,0.000008229604,0.00025028063,0.00024408642,0.00002513998,0.00020438901,0.000111332316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005440379,0.000013907549,0.00016361328,0.000013525764,0.00000856809,4.0327916e-7,0.009422364,0.0000021091075,0.00005861228,0.9766935,0.00019640563,0.013421515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092661765,0.00029947635,0.0071824156,0.000010993531,0.00008585457,0.000013329451,0.004020306,0.0011858748,0.0004180405,0.18917416,0.79635316,0.00032978947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038251786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031264368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79615676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004499032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027708567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9322204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139989865","doi":"10.1007/s10670-012-9422-3","title":"Indexical Reliabilism and the New Evil Demon","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indexicality; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Ontology; Demon; Philosophy of language; Counterfactual conditional; Appeal; Counterfactual thinking; Metaphysics; Law","score_opus":0.04357527472585419,"score_gpt":0.2513776039974619,"score_spread":0.2078023292716077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139989865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4113361,0.011534351,0.00023340313,0.030859075,0.0052718264,0.0005443135,0.00001573395,0.00019861278,0.5400066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616738,0.00015704971,0.00009715501,0.0025435525,0.0031135792,0.000009609056,0.0000033608328,0.000015997453,0.032385882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991909,0.00013409618,0.00016394632,0.00012348885,0.0001280184,0.00025955334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919426,0.00037193845,0.00005690421,0.0002223242,0.00003805233,0.000116488314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066423044,0.000112296126,0.0001878525,0.000021177682,0.00031526017,0.00007132575,0.00011722347,0.000077611185,0.00043623356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013249337,0.0000673688,0.00008089448,0.000017357279,0.0009106217,0.00017719084,0.00005871354,0.0002942,0.0001486913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027724443,0.000027078757,0.0011071793,0.000014278117,0.00002545972,4.180089e-7,0.051928293,1.3980154e-7,0.0000080695245,0.91512805,0.029342495,0.0023908305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057318056,0.000024928862,0.0010687477,0.0000109254115,0.00005169294,0.000004362325,0.0014379814,0.000017489458,0.00003660498,0.052368056,0.94429207,0.00011398939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044330495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002846748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91494954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000095027945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029181543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47764516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140116216","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.017","title":"The folk conception of knowledge","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Luck; Epistemology; Psychology; Attribution; Counterexample; Class (philosophy); Point (geometry); Descriptive knowledge; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10507118841854861,"score_gpt":0.3031589412682219,"score_spread":0.19808775284967328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140116216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21881178,0.003361403,0.00029411766,0.0003259128,0.0034033605,0.0002109494,0.000027307742,0.000058238278,0.77350694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99463785,0.000071029506,0.000009186218,0.000070272064,0.0013323841,0.000012312361,0.000022584449,0.0000055186247,0.003838878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960625,0.000068601,0.00011376237,0.000044125263,0.00005458211,0.000112704176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994888,0.0001696078,0.00007049193,0.00007362343,0.00017581925,0.000021694204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029161753,0.00004561677,0.00006576412,0.000014806042,0.00023928707,0.000016852378,0.00004240515,0.00003077854,0.00017163935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005053243,0.000031790758,0.000047053873,0.000012098141,0.00041020598,0.00013425994,0.000010979574,0.000074583986,0.00020221718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013742508,0.00010879669,0.00017153699,0.000047542428,0.00003075082,6.157622e-8,0.044071916,5.239404e-8,0.0008291479,0.9243001,0.0054836175,0.02494277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037242618,0.00008977738,0.001278329,0.000051505012,0.00011746524,0.0000012495658,0.0129189305,0.000014532337,0.007215257,0.061919678,0.9158832,0.00013767503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005432975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001067494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91039956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000062755403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001103644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25991604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140958637","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00093.x","title":"On Pragmatic Encroachment in Epistemology","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":329,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Implicature; Argument (complex analysis); Inference; Subject (documents); Orthodoxy; Philosophy; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Social epistemology; Computer science; Pragmatics; Linguistics; Theology","score_opus":0.28901598514164767,"score_gpt":0.4006608074164328,"score_spread":0.11164482227478512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140958637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13417299,0.00066750735,0.00002603539,0.005773747,0.00020803159,0.00036269,0.000008925757,0.0000371031,0.85874295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99688566,0.000107616084,0.0000685302,0.0008286112,0.00053222204,0.00004070328,0.0000093813505,0.000011652442,0.0015156417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759024,0.0005118341,0.00037002712,0.00042397215,0.00038953015,0.0007143734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968756,0.002541729,0.000053536798,0.00025539377,0.000121476216,0.00015226312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043197325,0.00016474936,0.00031615703,0.0003384846,0.000409932,0.000065317894,0.00025083954,0.00016054623,0.0005336394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004747064,0.00012269797,0.00004885994,0.000118722695,0.0019115915,0.00007578471,0.00014201617,0.0011235164,0.00020356293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016024259,0.0003530165,0.00021512725,0.00007564154,0.000016957601,0.000059523405,0.010030075,0.0000014973594,0.0000145390995,0.9864775,0.00009629895,0.0024995615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044668323,0.0010602196,0.00037170807,0.000036610385,0.0000034151324,0.0000035711785,0.0017453884,0.000010227307,0.000008323961,0.97847015,0.017703155,0.00014052299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000087866196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016342671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8627127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008252055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003054172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70433384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142934754","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqu033","title":"Counter Closure and Knowledge Despite Falsehood","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Prima facie; Epistemology; Denial; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Political science","score_opus":0.045700079642187946,"score_gpt":0.2577492157369722,"score_spread":0.21204913609478424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142934754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6124309,0.0011170026,0.00030657364,0.11165909,0.0018784078,0.00043660047,0.000053549156,0.00025964587,0.27185827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99262595,0.000009893536,0.000016055586,0.00233222,0.0034991826,0.00001766436,0.0000061458722,0.000025677746,0.0014672269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987598,0.0002964978,0.00025453602,0.00026048048,0.0001533046,0.000275352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989081,0.0004145188,0.00007678107,0.0003786203,0.0001220698,0.00009993147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006511919,0.00019773522,0.00027378663,0.000039063438,0.00045252746,0.00015548048,0.0002547023,0.00010593486,0.00012941353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031981814,0.00012489893,0.00011028103,0.000025858653,0.0011186065,0.00012845318,0.000029214685,0.00045546942,0.0003601755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019359122,0.000073161995,0.000061566636,0.00003743287,0.00004055292,0.0000011301951,0.037815835,9.403581e-8,0.00003685263,0.95732456,0.0005729903,0.0040164865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038695103,0.00062729296,0.00035010694,0.000026422926,0.00006665778,0.000007701889,0.0007625914,0.00009305203,0.0000078035955,0.86951,0.12796956,0.00019183713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038299175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033053666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38019508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000091912425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019126117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50932306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143510213","doi":"10.1111/theo.12005","title":"That's Outrageous","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Outrage; Presentism; Philosophy; Compatibilism; Epistemology; Political science; Determinism; Law","score_opus":0.06095525434760405,"score_gpt":0.23948096913494446,"score_spread":0.17852571478734042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143510213","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1817574,0.00016360913,0.00005563167,0.0012108793,0.0026899106,0.00016796205,0.00000867909,0.00015055567,0.8137954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9439865,0.000010186834,0.00004118094,0.00081439887,0.0012097566,0.00001824715,0.000005571493,0.0000142966,0.053899866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944913,0.000063606014,0.000099032535,0.000116466035,0.00008588733,0.00018589229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951184,0.00011482391,0.000044067838,0.00021684084,0.00006823326,0.000044169654],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019335523,0.00009119026,0.00013103976,0.000024487475,0.00016606029,0.000115621864,0.00014122081,0.000043909942,0.0062154075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023324643,0.00006932157,0.00006425248,0.000008691088,0.00033531245,0.00015669085,0.000023906337,0.00015186275,0.0033128045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002695991,0.000020514872,0.000034739493,0.000010500911,0.000018902092,0.0000015151032,0.016199188,2.4497353e-7,0.000056323363,0.9723841,0.009223074,0.0020482016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013511276,0.00003634669,0.00017617241,0.0000068354325,0.000016357977,0.0000015865253,0.0034504547,0.00000657681,0.00021174263,0.6692681,0.32656786,0.0001228872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045646064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014593542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7622291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007032542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012661157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144144446","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i3.2175","title":"Three Potential Problems for Powers' One-Fallacy Theory","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Counterexample; Ambiguity; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Inference; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Linguistics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.07424296417331332,"score_gpt":0.2579567446520901,"score_spread":0.1837137804787768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144144446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019441592,0.00054052315,0.021937177,0.0004547492,0.0026660224,0.00091949885,0.000064091735,0.00020250509,0.95377386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821296,0.00002747346,0.0011085905,0.0025951236,0.0007130465,0.00008114896,0.000044014247,0.000025135241,0.013275919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989664,0.000036536974,0.0003070927,0.00015101639,0.00014878616,0.00039016982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992916,0.00012353073,0.00012969263,0.00021299296,0.00018007267,0.000062125735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071159675,0.00016406226,0.00021644248,0.000059155678,0.00039374642,0.00012784325,0.00018545988,0.00011275128,0.00082537543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011251866,0.00013170965,0.0001792174,0.000020719026,0.0003933717,0.0003690684,0.000029856765,0.00021919343,0.00019813486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003969105,0.00005845271,0.00003767662,0.000080895334,0.000051905532,0.0000012871307,0.0063329577,0.000033859207,0.0000249344,0.9912814,0.00077917427,0.0012777903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056180946,0.0002903303,0.00007876466,0.000013871151,0.00004477036,0.00000516693,0.0015676824,0.000035656325,0.00008242893,0.57609385,0.42101198,0.00021366052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035044282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034562362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96268797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007014318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90372825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144840764","doi":"10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.109","title":"Epistemic Trust and Social Location","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Epistemology; Character (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Order (exchange); Trustworthiness; Social character; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03924211562831722,"score_gpt":0.24320220153468292,"score_spread":0.2039600859063657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144840764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47664627,0.0017372158,0.00027652283,0.01175303,0.0019829108,0.00039905033,0.000056906076,0.00028244196,0.5068657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95502424,0.000007681696,0.000044379245,0.0004067171,0.0019986613,0.000015382133,0.00005014668,0.00001947851,0.042433307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990898,0.00008150644,0.00027046018,0.00021397491,0.00013340535,0.00021088099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995233,0.00006958994,0.00011971293,0.00013236732,0.00012879439,0.000026242065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027864843,0.0001350524,0.0002071643,0.000050947012,0.00047898252,0.00010989726,0.00008913432,0.00008209253,0.00015720862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013127786,0.00012767421,0.00006009977,0.0000270556,0.00064960646,0.0001467009,0.000025581805,0.00015629941,0.00013071968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007269107,0.00003947448,0.00065598334,0.00014901855,0.000014395463,0.000002641093,0.006986007,0.0000015268041,0.00009933623,0.9844578,0.0068567824,0.0007297668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007260627,0.00008069053,0.0075753564,0.000044697368,0.0000772044,0.000012063259,0.00385503,0.000106072635,0.00016532843,0.160944,0.825958,0.00045547678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083239126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015341548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8235138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003400516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003249715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5206403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145849627","doi":"10.2478/disp-2004-0010","title":"Of counterfeits and delusions: Revisiting Ryle on skepticism and the impossibility of global deceit","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disputatio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Impossibility; Proposition; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Absurdism; Law; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.027751266840540273,"score_gpt":0.2839260045232231,"score_spread":0.25617473768268284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145849627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880931,0.0007918634,0.00012596483,0.0007119309,0.000085777436,0.00014925138,0.00006745582,0.000007735291,0.009966941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994656,0.000051358493,0.00009124057,0.00026760835,0.00006108102,0.0000027489016,0.0000036252388,0.000003922481,0.00005280073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938995,0.00006260869,0.0002389576,0.00011854145,0.000106396714,0.0000835758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933034,0.00027036437,0.00014172432,0.00011492869,0.00011941816,0.000023213652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039946372,0.00007293189,0.00019574213,0.0000103437105,0.00013607668,0.000025929741,0.000054053835,0.000028896335,0.000011527226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016313979,0.00004740296,0.000043223168,0.00002062476,0.0009764979,0.00006290243,0.00003053957,0.000073105424,0.0000013739873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060511888,0.000033671568,0.0017535359,0.00013430761,0.000027516726,6.5179836e-7,0.023303768,0.00002685985,0.000026300273,0.9730666,0.000010753758,0.0015555138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004979669,0.00045226625,0.07441436,0.00056953996,0.00026788,0.000008924596,0.024049375,0.00033613484,0.00043772667,0.89252484,0.0016486704,0.00031060944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038415598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061322557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08054176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012910278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032442724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3597947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148252766","doi":"10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.80","title":"Objectivity and Perspective in Empirical Knowledge","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; San Francisco State University","keywords":"Warrant; Precondition; Objectivity (philosophy); Legitimacy; Rationality; Epistemology; Perception; Perspective (graphical); Positive economics; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06977953594066864,"score_gpt":0.3231146883300579,"score_spread":0.25333515238938925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148252766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3920821,0.0015656318,0.000021305214,0.0017487443,0.00047319886,0.00013913003,0.000011980465,0.000058841135,0.60389906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790223,0.000010440157,0.000032680462,0.00014624614,0.0008018696,0.000013399913,0.0000036172714,0.000013184383,0.01995623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990981,0.00015628661,0.00018726006,0.0002656095,0.000079800746,0.00021295017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994556,0.00020898663,0.000050174836,0.00014288569,0.000106458174,0.000035920493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034658602,0.00012612362,0.0002352128,0.0000840759,0.00016680545,0.00005894657,0.00006876985,0.00006963155,0.0000929672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053673848,0.00011350335,0.000059108625,0.00004133951,0.0005901922,0.00012744068,0.000040538358,0.0002492836,0.000072119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011231546,0.0002033092,0.010841996,0.000042809646,0.000011345017,0.000010486397,0.03688582,8.178017e-7,0.000030725492,0.9484302,0.0032881435,0.00024316146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001199096,0.00020276471,0.10289753,0.00007430897,0.000040039602,0.000013464665,0.018192438,0.00013887146,0.00014415651,0.43466872,0.44185364,0.00057494594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029418722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035716865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5869402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009003929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048587783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9818788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148809725","doi":"10.1162/106361403322286689","title":"The Contexts of Philosophy of Science","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Citation; Search engine optimization; Download; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Search engine","score_opus":0.06425133029479069,"score_gpt":0.3141780603158631,"score_spread":0.2499267300210724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148809725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31211996,0.0007210476,0.00002314366,0.0005943402,0.00068775745,0.00012089929,0.0000068069744,0.000012164817,0.6857139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884456,0.000053354208,0.00007015728,0.00006935684,0.000060117713,0.000002716013,2.8993519e-8,0.0000032905837,0.0008964195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871415,0.00005042058,0.00016844581,0.0002749717,0.00056417234,0.00022786428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829435,0.00027650353,0.00015567325,0.00035158749,0.00087189,0.00005000069],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020225497,0.00007499505,0.00013464826,0.00013671022,0.0010716993,0.00006734386,0.0006024133,0.000012868087,0.000036445974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011670028,0.000047182206,0.00005643071,0.00028269956,0.039579757,0.000284445,0.00003725641,0.00011862091,0.000009845816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006127177,0.00005699215,0.00004578124,0.0000047021053,0.0000031013924,1.412345e-7,0.07634165,0.0000018532139,0.0039462056,0.91936404,0.000013939127,0.00021544204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045502637,0.0007646933,0.0022852547,0.00008665063,0.000019365094,0.000003196429,0.28015986,0.000041291194,0.089682415,0.6062255,0.019975169,0.00030162005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037808775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003260315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6867246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004178939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034654574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.963034},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2150056758","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2012.00082.x","title":"The Ought-Is Gap: Trouble For Hybrid Semantics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Expressivism; Epistemology; Normative; Semantics (computer science); Ontology; Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.11911483433510818,"score_gpt":0.30034796166571776,"score_spread":0.1812331273306096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150056758","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102830194,0.0028020937,0.0013228616,0.7915099,0.008045084,0.0017363841,0.0003180485,0.00032488536,0.09111051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831151,0.000026290068,0.000047721987,0.0039681406,0.008395099,0.00008608622,0.000013287557,0.000036888305,0.0043114005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984498,0.00015490189,0.00033813235,0.00019064754,0.00025621994,0.00061027857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799365,0.001012389,0.0001348634,0.00057808764,0.00015799404,0.00012299762],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009773086,0.00021258357,0.00025582797,0.000022544202,0.0014065732,0.00020332458,0.0004820104,0.00007033662,0.00009583544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046967238,0.00011187712,0.00026955563,0.00002552183,0.0009854325,0.00021202464,0.000026192023,0.00042576794,0.00030618283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045709196,0.00009913672,0.000011398108,0.000026866266,0.00008111845,5.20217e-7,0.024140308,1.2475682e-7,0.000023450539,0.9660644,0.007518028,0.0019889395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024977708,0.00027229745,0.000015461635,0.000008087603,0.00008427524,0.000005114779,0.0013142849,0.00006350139,0.000067558176,0.67602277,0.32175827,0.00013862636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034414647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006545899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8802849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018052597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026567095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150078957","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1043","title":"Treacherous Ascents: On Seeking Common Ground for Conflict Resolution","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generality; Common ground; Resolution (logic); Computer science; Conflict resolution; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13516825870943205,"score_gpt":0.3132166242604163,"score_spread":0.17804836555098424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150078957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24873407,0.0004010625,0.0007902144,0.001891054,0.0014689066,0.0006990461,0.00008670918,0.00029822113,0.7456307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98437285,0.000027460159,0.00020188242,0.004916325,0.0015940393,0.00003473321,0.00009198428,0.00001449978,0.0087462375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991002,0.000032986383,0.00029278002,0.00012695951,0.00013451831,0.00031256393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994027,0.00014582675,0.00013755534,0.00017475072,0.00009070165,0.000048482776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034312293,0.0001476451,0.0001997816,0.00006073714,0.00040810753,0.000110843146,0.00013973229,0.00010723483,0.000109991546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038135273,0.000121845536,0.00011948868,0.000016554364,0.00022184849,0.0003847086,0.000024623527,0.00023367367,0.00018556429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012652327,0.00011170055,0.00008174331,0.000059858216,0.00003656891,0.0000013305566,0.021762528,0.0001387069,0.000021513446,0.954147,0.002325429,0.021187108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007160184,0.0005017635,0.00047470676,0.000028765127,0.00003651925,0.000004129741,0.0015598421,0.0011748689,0.000059951588,0.003945518,0.9912995,0.0001984003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019677024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010857508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005589204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020005822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49687168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150102685","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3896","title":"Govier on Trust","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Social trust; Politics; Express trust; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Blind trust; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Law; Social science; Philosophy; Social capital","score_opus":0.07036793476111594,"score_gpt":0.25225399418691247,"score_spread":0.18188605942579653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150102685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099473484,0.000036501602,0.0000065083645,0.00069832784,0.0007747484,0.00013208966,0.000007802379,0.00007466919,0.89879584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93148834,0.00001221577,0.00005222081,0.008134491,0.00067384844,0.000027713166,0.000013014735,0.000008154271,0.059590027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937147,0.000016460976,0.00018214376,0.0000850343,0.000114910836,0.00022997103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995834,0.00005602559,0.00006363255,0.0001674218,0.00007626778,0.000053233787],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011281238,0.00010765055,0.00013114416,0.00004012473,0.00019643099,0.00011531716,0.00013558987,0.00006492482,0.005254856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030511615,0.000075341595,0.00007607232,0.000013927766,0.00027131144,0.000307793,0.000028856115,0.00021778618,0.008134555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005269775,0.000026034128,0.00012503199,0.000016319207,0.0000119110055,0.0000013481714,0.006576366,0.000005939242,0.0000074356544,0.9766281,0.010070661,0.0065255617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018343021,0.00027714364,0.001139428,0.000008918082,0.000008088022,0.0000019165204,0.0017398526,0.000051207233,0.000062405066,0.026886504,0.96948624,0.00015486252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018325601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008539488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95941556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000956012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017263867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99565446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151491297","doi":"","title":"From tracking relations to propositional attitudes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ascription; Propositional formula; Relation (database); Social psychology; Epistemology; Psychology; Propositional variable; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.025848263779187326,"score_gpt":0.21418427507962845,"score_spread":0.18833601130044111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151491297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9671073,0.000027642474,0.003314748,0.003029074,0.0003035961,0.00017324631,0.00012232811,0.00014554104,0.025776505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98852646,0.0000033887968,0.0028832164,0.00014758472,0.00022405002,1.9642085e-12,0.00007681209,0.0000053676677,0.008133088],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904734,0.000113044545,0.00011380656,0.00028172997,0.00022718478,0.00021686626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901,0.0001357611,0.00013832112,0.00017545305,0.0003995319,0.00014090407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013275073,0.00013643877,0.00022859695,0.00016000701,0.00067424466,0.000032200052,0.00031089137,0.000080829544,0.00039891482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021359998,0.00017763807,0.00013576004,0.0000971115,0.0002810783,0.00025526798,0.000101267564,0.00021322955,0.000103827864],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105784406,0.00030518987,0.0004463817,0.000016737633,0.00013209184,0.00008360702,0.8036091,0.0012995959,0.00016968217,0.18176211,0.009581676,0.002488062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018233478,0.00027697737,0.016516805,0.00033516446,0.0003420704,0.0000039350866,0.9086656,0.0014265412,0.00009093053,0.005157448,0.064653024,0.0007081363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012644586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011357444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17660467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016864018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010694649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.724387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151840772","doi":"10.1017/epi.2011.3","title":"PRAGMATIC ENCROACHMENT: IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT KNOWLEDGE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Position (finance); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.11624474444326378,"score_gpt":0.32281953424766463,"score_spread":0.20657478980440086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151840772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021981524,0.0026327865,0.00011513686,0.0033152278,0.005499029,0.00037294166,0.000053747404,0.00019084709,0.96583873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8738458,0.000047512312,0.00012961873,0.001622285,0.003361227,0.000053384367,0.000035613673,0.00003573207,0.120868795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982937,0.00022986696,0.0004468722,0.00023192154,0.00021243816,0.0005852277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987909,0.00028056005,0.00018341729,0.0004285192,0.00013661277,0.0001799964],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010084274,0.00024362096,0.00036341857,0.000081554885,0.00047740643,0.00012181759,0.0002586891,0.00010908581,0.0016793123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000099335426,0.0002096821,0.00017611272,0.00004031533,0.0005695106,0.0004176615,0.00008127986,0.0003373342,0.003269999],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007487533,0.0002690995,0.0003498573,0.00038953315,0.000071793205,0.0000019184563,0.10803795,4.2041358e-7,0.0000718719,0.85286206,0.03688908,0.0010489159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032225493,0.00005027014,0.0006379658,0.00008858705,0.000091410475,0.0000057521993,0.0052994625,0.000022497052,0.00022346988,0.0019773748,0.99097705,0.00030388648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000111120346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004073625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.954088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063842854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055209108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152897019","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.016","title":"Authentic Gettier cases: A reply to Starmans and Friedman","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Attribution; Argument (complex analysis); Presentation (obstetrics); Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05863602659064587,"score_gpt":0.26524457849697397,"score_spread":0.2066085519063281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152897019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8996179,0.00024043841,0.00013527158,0.0031912725,0.00065156264,0.0004871948,0.00005363027,0.00010697104,0.09551576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98615843,0.000011817838,0.00008087117,0.0047762985,0.00042010998,0.000061654275,0.00003688131,0.000013327341,0.008440621],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994334,0.000044931498,0.0001276809,0.00015923029,0.00009376137,0.00014101261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999448,0.00006513473,0.000037751124,0.000111141286,0.00024447482,0.0000935125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001403486,0.00008398834,0.00010534808,0.000053880078,0.00017148317,0.00012556333,0.00003870662,0.000030258914,0.0007264702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082687155,0.00007629514,0.000027221147,0.000017435084,0.000169243,0.00019522173,0.000024047584,0.00009610374,0.00067553594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007950107,0.00035331887,0.0002944419,0.0004267014,0.00020362673,0.00006609506,0.38820547,0.0000013616119,0.0014563138,0.18429498,0.3916927,0.03292549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006799358,0.00046205142,0.00076035125,0.00010380209,0.00018811924,0.000025658503,0.026833711,0.00007118685,0.00059047755,0.17088677,0.7989639,0.0004340401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029634527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027261933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4072712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011063847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017961485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86828727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154108805","doi":"10.1515/krt-2005-011904","title":"A Neo-Hintikkan Theory of Attitude Ascriptions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Ascription; Virtue; Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Perception; Causal theory of reference; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08428689025647347,"score_gpt":0.2828760510128702,"score_spread":0.19858916075639677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154108805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6073362,0.008331402,0.0021076757,0.029980222,0.0068862378,0.00037014205,0.0001515876,0.00008653387,0.34474996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921245,0.00014617047,0.0010528764,0.0010754208,0.0042266767,0.0000013140804,0.0000032961095,0.000018601808,0.0013511386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986686,0.00017858806,0.0006330223,0.00010318779,0.00026175563,0.0001548508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860513,0.00010584914,0.0005541083,0.0001910397,0.00045570216,0.00008817709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007294292,0.00013872198,0.00036169196,0.0002072648,0.00016519263,0.000055157707,0.000251367,0.00006726416,0.0008715942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006637141,0.00011155358,0.00032383492,0.0000373353,0.00050163403,0.00042623948,0.000033942895,0.00037101834,0.000044906887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075664524,0.00025166885,0.0000805504,0.000068706635,0.00014783446,0.000009525843,0.018781018,0.00001438641,0.0022924887,0.972784,0.0013584428,0.0041357535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079124933,0.00048184773,0.00039806287,0.00025033078,0.00015597981,0.00007795077,0.00093589054,0.0000115615985,0.00063373207,0.61999774,0.3760632,0.00020242893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007642512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033727603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38478827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028306316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053858566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9543345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154127350","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i3.4295","title":"Inference, Circularity, and Begging the Question","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Begging; Inference; Semantic reasoner; Epistemology; Statement (logic); Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1490930985878663,"score_gpt":0.3231040273235812,"score_spread":0.1740109287357149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154127350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31849676,0.0004879626,0.0005289757,0.001719327,0.0012009148,0.00016603456,0.000008313811,0.00012177923,0.67726994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630123,0.000020531854,0.00005665935,0.0017401672,0.0003205084,0.000006317734,0.000008883501,0.0000033870497,0.0015422818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995125,0.00004031169,0.00013225451,0.000063794,0.000111593254,0.00013957056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956304,0.00007315137,0.000057602432,0.00011015634,0.00014805008,0.00004801472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005385489,0.00007343111,0.00009086869,0.00002865014,0.00023299403,0.00014835453,0.00009558868,0.000048208945,0.000033721157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011535151,0.00004527274,0.00002631558,0.000015828839,0.000417587,0.00033042618,0.00006351042,0.0002009639,0.000066445056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034181005,0.0000068217137,0.0015943447,0.000012700324,0.0000074411932,0.0000012085619,0.014255815,0.000011699877,0.0000014616593,0.98167,0.00029514017,0.002139926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038764012,0.00019340511,0.0047394936,0.000026734611,0.000038381295,0.000019144241,0.009251867,0.0005895338,0.00001931574,0.35932344,0.625176,0.0002350052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003198462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044533616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6778045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008247964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040675888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18461686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154311707","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i2.3886","title":"Throwing the Baby Out with the Water: From Reasonably Scrutinizing Authorities to Rampant Scepticism About Expertise","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Expert opinion; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.06019313579507564,"score_gpt":0.2553742799430113,"score_spread":0.1951811441479357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154311707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52015,0.0005723788,0.002345448,0.022116099,0.0026704466,0.0007856273,0.000052524065,0.00035241465,0.45095506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779349,0.000016212081,0.00022664422,0.0129304165,0.0015342236,0.000060018447,0.000021229409,0.000022605886,0.0072537293],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998493,0.00013215549,0.0003231006,0.00020140683,0.00030982998,0.00054047984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889857,0.00032070215,0.00009723993,0.0004528024,0.00014606364,0.000084628766],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083259953,0.00024437142,0.00028560025,0.000036661633,0.0013431566,0.000492766,0.00049028255,0.00008416261,0.00025860453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008829825,0.00009107537,0.00011126192,0.000022258393,0.00080569356,0.00038672617,0.00016305897,0.00041810094,0.00039735445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007548856,0.0000226397,0.0001111127,0.000025060763,0.00007961519,0.0000040562986,0.52786064,0.00008758295,0.00016574048,0.45830372,0.0026328124,0.010631565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039883686,0.00034824802,0.00052649534,0.00011797086,0.00008007837,0.0000048258003,0.06560804,0.00031077233,0.00085180596,0.010490987,0.9208636,0.00039832314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008174663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001757709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91823083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021424168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032381387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154612823","doi":"10.1007/s11229-008-9362-2","title":"On the general argument against internalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of mind; Chemistry","score_opus":0.08977492457558882,"score_gpt":0.264598720397324,"score_spread":0.17482379582173518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154612823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7319807,0.00009065959,0.000012477268,0.0029329374,0.00090747845,0.00008678287,0.000012260689,0.000040231083,0.26393646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95330536,0.00006934534,0.000017587336,0.004387059,0.0009512947,0.000018539391,0.000002978997,0.000014252527,0.041233603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930274,0.00010214228,0.00013443007,0.00013561874,0.00015394772,0.00017108701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932414,0.0002739318,0.000054257733,0.00026671623,0.000044726297,0.000036231362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021651121,0.00010764113,0.000121842684,0.000028516903,0.00034230525,0.000038837985,0.00019777483,0.000033010718,0.00075410935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008997439,0.00006322383,0.00010466982,0.000010458428,0.0004919475,0.000047409285,0.00003270048,0.00020949724,0.0005033523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010465738,0.000067639754,0.000038042945,0.0000061641135,0.000046433648,0.000022141461,0.026718317,0.000005861533,0.00014049119,0.9559375,0.016117226,0.0008897328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017967662,0.00009568552,0.00014083166,0.00006507074,0.00002024104,0.000008552123,0.002608755,0.000112677844,0.002412909,0.04633318,0.9477762,0.00024624317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018334949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016630483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9316589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020042005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019363639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8256968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W215540139","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511806544.009","title":"SAMPLING","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Sampling (signal processing); Computer vision","score_opus":0.14448924539020866,"score_gpt":0.2538052668815421,"score_spread":0.10931602149133343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W215540139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004265298,0.00024629003,0.0003344051,0.000017205888,0.0011900992,0.00023445419,0.0003033859,0.00018570348,0.9974458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003576473,0.00008237178,0.00008898539,0.00026370952,0.0012640168,2.3688679e-7,0.00007671103,0.000060100963,0.9978062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987744,0.000026466028,0.00021387533,0.00042457058,0.00023448198,0.00032617044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987225,0.00015455499,0.00024112534,0.00046175387,0.00028089568,0.00013917302],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019728654,0.00035930425,0.00044442335,0.00018948714,0.00046975102,0.00007874845,0.0003976549,0.00039117716,0.00004903834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008611865,0.00041670987,0.00031763155,0.0000017522731,0.000994414,0.0000839054,0.00019824757,0.00083247776,0.00007506356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034492346,0.000007188878,2.6294126e-7,0.00010776424,0.00015554493,0.00011470146,0.0012205354,3.8644683e-7,0.000004037461,0.9789193,0.018250294,0.001185494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025318717,0.000038637536,0.0000010185823,0.00012981957,0.00024814025,0.000004731256,0.00033544935,0.0000026629614,0.00003087998,0.00028384782,0.99822664,0.00044497472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003396183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000086547145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97997636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011481244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086546126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157689524","doi":"10.1111/phil.12032","title":"The Epistemic Argument for Mental Causation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Forum","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Argument (complex analysis); Citation; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Library science; Medicine","score_opus":0.05995215967090298,"score_gpt":0.2804983357918484,"score_spread":0.22054617612094543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157689524","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017511386,0.0002863535,0.00071170524,0.930979,0.0028788124,0.00086472475,0.000058206708,0.000092612754,0.046617206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99035054,0.000030119108,0.000020467713,0.0038875993,0.002157213,0.00010247602,0.000026058622,0.000018572322,0.0034069594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989953,0.00013070961,0.00023510923,0.00015849808,0.00017867328,0.00030171673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987568,0.00070612784,0.000098046905,0.00031807038,0.00007486559,0.00004608327],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008350496,0.0001252534,0.00014265,0.000014236112,0.0015672621,0.0001045254,0.00028309328,0.000054698197,0.000036834645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000102950195,0.00006420875,0.00014555357,0.000014036796,0.0007350795,0.00006304152,0.00005895701,0.00021748104,0.000088200766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003385976,0.00002657906,0.000009983169,0.000011640273,0.000033509186,6.092359e-8,0.0027127597,0.0000016317412,0.00007274842,0.99260736,0.0028450608,0.0016448335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018278355,0.00010220305,0.000009981008,0.000006988908,0.00002373456,0.0000011055722,0.0004828761,0.00028569438,0.00006447803,0.63352376,0.3652514,0.00006501802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030580108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024879162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9728392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031076936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014971008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157873197","doi":"10.2478/disp-2004-0009","title":"Reasons, contents and experiences","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disputatio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Perception; Analytic philosophy; Psychology; Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.059146966853287235,"score_gpt":0.27766258996119003,"score_spread":0.2185156231079028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157873197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9606997,0.00049601233,0.00008627304,0.00079193874,0.0004904293,0.00007054112,0.000012090313,0.000039167644,0.037313867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970275,0.000016559827,0.000090101,0.00058910454,0.000146886,0.000020816555,0.000009740395,0.0000059092467,0.0020933782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960005,0.000017258146,0.000091453556,0.0001126082,0.00007631394,0.000102297745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997816,0.000035593872,0.000036460227,0.00006229526,0.000045883407,0.000038138987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005636408,0.00006306978,0.000090083406,0.000018457238,0.00018420702,0.000072194634,0.000046744626,0.000022119435,0.000067474786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034620254,0.000051810603,0.00002546562,0.000009740348,0.00041080863,0.00013311942,0.000011440397,0.00005913961,0.000028477703],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041372614,0.00002668169,0.00034323154,0.000013523962,0.00001252633,0.0000038276366,0.30212143,0.0000016610734,0.000012257964,0.69611406,0.00021885677,0.0011277961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001476835,0.00022107981,0.004848925,0.00009272001,0.00005752107,0.000008950573,0.67108315,0.00001998431,0.00047819255,0.14907181,0.17216519,0.00047566948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029378835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037306827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54704225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007013883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014773935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2112775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161719373","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300003115","title":"Idealism, Scepticism, and Internal Relations: Remarks on Hymers's<i>Philosophy and Its Epistemic Neuroses</i>","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Skepticism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.041824757905313426,"score_gpt":0.25028534020856424,"score_spread":0.20846058230325082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161719373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69883764,0.0028431516,0.00011416839,0.016207254,0.0032616423,0.00061117066,0.00026283236,0.0002055687,0.27765656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933925,0.00030716907,0.00003492657,0.0037198125,0.0009164985,0.000013717022,0.0000482176,0.000027223787,0.0015398838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895245,0.00009879945,0.0002770686,0.00031670707,0.00014089905,0.0002140952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932736,0.00019699444,0.00011586682,0.00017926881,0.00007883904,0.00010164553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023179843,0.00018805717,0.00024736614,0.00009970526,0.00032917628,0.000107573826,0.00010371912,0.00010758194,0.000043213695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014103152,0.00017181659,0.0000656909,0.000027859387,0.0004760261,0.00012440972,0.000051438583,0.00039017404,0.0000859851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025586496,0.000032684013,0.00010110885,0.000055691467,0.00002531556,0.00001854354,0.011295418,0.000014860938,0.00016696971,0.9874376,0.0005323099,0.00029387823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023032946,0.00074345776,0.0021142627,0.0005112019,0.0001431261,0.000064240936,0.0009940816,0.000056816465,0.000381305,0.9479683,0.044042174,0.00067773735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025287233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052669377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2945549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027218603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032464115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7006477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161834173","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.013","title":"Slurring and common knowledge of ordinary language","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Utterance; Contempt; Linguistics; Sentence; Contradiction; Psychology; Meaning (existential); Competence (human resources); Emotive; Philosophy; Epistemology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03050663867209077,"score_gpt":0.2922494981573361,"score_spread":0.26174285948524534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161834173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9373376,0.0015643813,0.00039411095,0.0002576162,0.0006539421,0.000042802523,0.000003532149,0.000007267676,0.059738778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698937,0.000054251577,0.0012162429,0.000079061196,0.0006148476,2.5521615e-7,5.3510405e-7,0.00000940785,0.0010360329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992987,0.00011436486,0.0003772507,0.00003792286,0.00008883839,0.000082930295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989305,0.00034460062,0.00041684197,0.00009838357,0.0001661113,0.00004353259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079564727,0.000068708105,0.00028322596,0.0000708187,0.00006988056,0.000026898946,0.00010062314,0.000037586116,0.00004117809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014795733,0.000052248604,0.00006680604,0.000014920618,0.00020320374,0.00011885822,0.00003392892,0.00022288147,0.000004095706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003605156,0.0003395424,0.0016450927,0.0013086479,0.00019778984,0.00001380712,0.2735688,0.000017091836,0.0016852976,0.69038224,0.003548612,0.027257023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039971704,0.0032966374,0.003887163,0.0022569927,0.0009930697,0.00039598718,0.09684872,0.0038283488,0.004216215,0.16634212,0.7130718,0.00086571736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020063275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015538985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70952326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000078730955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002273234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21306363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161873852","doi":"10.7202/011070ar","title":"L’interprétationnisme radical","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.25934951122825617,"score_gpt":0.3669458424763485,"score_spread":0.10759633124809231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161873852","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005255662,0.06797241,0.00022809446,0.46317628,0.0033331227,0.00022830821,0.00010076956,0.0001740849,0.45953128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85406524,0.0040984573,0.0019614794,0.026129438,0.06063367,0.000034286444,0.0000704624,0.00007529518,0.052931696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823743,0.00024322202,0.0004820318,0.00036250043,0.0002451167,0.0004296898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998883,0.00025096833,0.00015841906,0.00031793123,0.00021113073,0.00017855431],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039629618,0.00029627056,0.00036957584,0.000101875565,0.000473623,0.0001593041,0.00026442748,0.0002554285,0.0043639718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008982057,0.00030170163,0.0002592683,0.00002672067,0.0022605737,0.00039543246,0.000063265936,0.0006209445,0.0011320913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020671625,0.00029850367,0.000030802054,0.00017423971,0.0001032957,0.000014492608,0.014285782,0.0000061433443,0.000040987838,0.94347715,0.03369725,0.007850654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020034578,0.00011727583,0.00003387467,0.00013940131,0.00006441872,0.000010601142,0.00019461726,0.00016288848,0.00018468832,0.35150856,0.6471556,0.00022772475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034367436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033163652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84880954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120527635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000083286686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163687581","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/8g2av","title":"Manifest Failure: The Gettier Problem Solved","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Section (typography); Key (lock); Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law and economics; Economics; Computer security","score_opus":0.08326859743021658,"score_gpt":0.23392681129655415,"score_spread":0.15065821386633757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163687581","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041543157,0.00021451456,0.00020564336,0.11882351,0.00048923335,0.00031425935,0.000013568277,0.00022357432,0.87556136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89941585,0.000014216126,0.00064618554,0.028888078,0.0029861701,0.000030157453,0.000018062305,0.000033238124,0.067968056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992705,0.00006346931,0.00016320862,0.00016437058,0.00015373157,0.00018472904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951506,0.00006936389,0.000050557148,0.00016232513,0.00012331686,0.00007940472],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021412554,0.00011088347,0.00013746085,0.000009903324,0.0002618297,0.0001335904,0.00021323499,0.00004337301,0.0013290603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029028399,0.00006415787,0.00007861053,0.000021923564,0.0003483045,0.000114508744,0.000055281223,0.00025183574,0.00065770524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049481628,0.000016024258,0.00003773472,0.000024349649,0.000030346291,0.0000032186442,0.04133241,0.000002198912,0.000035822137,0.7703429,0.18791176,0.00025827184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001585109,0.00006436133,0.000013567363,0.000003561502,0.000026489079,0.0000013953232,0.011423379,0.000059475657,0.00007154355,0.025082577,0.9629814,0.00011374189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012845178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014087093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8952615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000075008043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004773031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166139333","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2153","title":"An Epistemological Approach to Argumentation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Epistemology; Interpersonal communication; Simple (philosophy); Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09099506718038776,"score_gpt":0.2969452559415837,"score_spread":0.20595018876119597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166139333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31804815,0.000034602323,0.012735504,0.00052108185,0.0007135696,0.00038512552,0.00001749768,0.00022639638,0.6673181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906493,0.0000037511238,0.0023472498,0.005163495,0.00044656402,0.000037059817,0.0000772737,0.000008245161,0.0012670973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991038,0.000035158315,0.00026268998,0.00016968754,0.00015214503,0.0002765603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994997,0.00002371409,0.000072189454,0.00019522126,0.000089842564,0.00011934245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028415167,0.00013675768,0.0001721485,0.000066966895,0.00027437427,0.00013089439,0.00020547652,0.00008758407,0.00012502266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002727299,0.00010371553,0.00006945375,0.00003618252,0.00024735316,0.00047654432,0.00003265622,0.00018939028,0.00034868333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021402067,0.00014796469,0.00008074466,0.000018156292,0.000009925688,0.0000028609738,0.01633348,0.0024163956,0.00003505843,0.9799878,0.000068106856,0.00087808183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005617182,0.008491385,0.025227956,0.00008429573,0.00019881428,0.00018557269,0.064379744,0.0017921603,0.001699531,0.44158974,0.44765815,0.003075487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001445888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007515585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6726011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034573193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003059785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4481735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167832813","doi":"10.1111/cogs.12182","title":"Is Probabilistic Evidence a Source of Knowledge?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Denial; Distrust; Psychology; Perception; Social psychology; Population; Trustworthiness; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Sociology","score_opus":0.14625263471767175,"score_gpt":0.3397310837496137,"score_spread":0.19347844903194195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167832813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5672989,0.0008696622,0.0054017943,0.000589266,0.0012777284,0.00044595826,0.000019865522,0.000088677974,0.42400816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922957,0.000010317239,0.000061647355,0.00045510542,0.00024411092,0.00001250674,5.4604e-7,0.0000070078086,0.006913101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988266,0.00010276738,0.00019751137,0.00034361987,0.00027047395,0.0002590089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973338,0.0009817778,0.00012842464,0.0001976301,0.0012767491,0.000081566206],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013982977,0.00010705971,0.00018806366,0.00010129391,0.00040708642,0.00007312231,0.00035329448,0.000028198476,0.00022309953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033583108,0.000088621746,0.00006464927,0.00015318724,0.0071515334,0.00035064286,0.00010771841,0.00014315496,0.00022285209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029185341,0.00023927273,0.0015550515,0.00039807658,0.000020391226,7.520111e-7,0.20729169,0.0000022268357,0.002756066,0.74182343,0.00064258935,0.045241274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00264725,0.003817752,0.027403526,0.008369783,0.0007389899,0.000026628224,0.06168262,0.0103184115,0.096832156,0.48817435,0.2970334,0.0029551506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060092294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000118205615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42499676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018232535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021636483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99555045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168133519","doi":"10.1177/0048393106296572","title":"Unwrinkling the Carpet of Meaning","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Reification (Marxism); Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Relation (database); Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy of language; Extension (predicate logic); Natural (archaeology); Metaphysics; Linguistics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.16461753626215953,"score_gpt":0.3356673704731893,"score_spread":0.17104983421102976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168133519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21419376,0.00020992037,0.000012189306,0.009123869,0.0010907857,0.000097652635,0.000007845954,0.000013395028,0.77525055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817836,0.0000054661896,0.000032129803,0.00033787746,0.0012129772,6.9512873e-7,1.4707791e-7,0.0000031247648,0.00022921512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914306,0.000076006625,0.00019896898,0.00009488017,0.00033149956,0.00015559029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932534,0.00023911436,0.00022974919,0.000096276235,0.00009813884,0.000011403957],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017027996,0.000061354556,0.0001323093,0.000026715657,0.0012675916,0.000023449655,0.0005428832,0.000028748529,0.000025254954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008050823,0.00003211364,0.00015053015,0.0000957524,0.0044532693,0.00007966807,0.00007632064,0.00013249286,0.0000017744577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024794167,0.000013027896,0.00027980996,0.0000142284725,0.000011535223,6.4034715e-8,0.067584336,0.000004739231,0.00014102981,0.93160266,0.000057232053,0.00028884312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006678279,0.00004179719,0.00080311595,0.000029554609,0.000032859512,2.9144095e-7,0.014922145,0.000007804746,0.0016978905,0.9775354,0.004790846,0.000071505536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046837024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059754826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7839846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000839272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042768035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168458288","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i1.3608","title":"Virtue and Argument: Taking Character Into Account","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.044226886786066295,"score_gpt":0.25235894873701714,"score_spread":0.20813206195095085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168458288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67539597,0.00018258818,0.00003456241,0.000901084,0.00080750877,0.00022173874,0.0000060649363,0.000080941,0.32236952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99010366,0.000031482916,0.00009596745,0.0052127205,0.000563533,0.000031188876,0.000013943444,0.000008008081,0.003939494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934053,0.000015603811,0.00021848387,0.000107296815,0.00010653203,0.00021154036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999532,0.00004864025,0.0001375293,0.00013036693,0.00009674328,0.000054746495],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016400902,0.00012466351,0.0001536094,0.000051239567,0.00026960138,0.0002642007,0.000109997505,0.000070320464,0.0012924002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027446436,0.00009249474,0.000045415094,0.000012899679,0.00030084036,0.0009450228,0.00007588884,0.00020849341,0.0008303971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060014045,0.000022319757,0.0007952049,0.00006705863,0.000027268008,0.0000021744809,0.02724905,0.0000010624077,0.00012808955,0.95815146,0.0005544943,0.012995841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053534115,0.00026347104,0.01848684,0.0000512216,0.000036576494,0.000013788675,0.0065888506,0.00024037002,0.00023748672,0.083864085,0.8891732,0.00050873373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050519436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017079672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88861877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011875575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015062735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171784418","doi":"10.1007/s11229-010-9800-9","title":"Two kinds of a priori infallibility","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Infallibility; A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Philosophy of language; Falsity","score_opus":0.0450158265678674,"score_gpt":0.2905311945748012,"score_spread":0.2455153680069338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171784418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79230154,0.00003347493,0.0000074498266,0.0002874506,0.0010182319,0.00008755035,0.000023499553,0.000040065923,0.20620073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99576,0.0000038596027,0.00022784583,0.00013949005,0.00056537724,0.0000069950456,0.0000023644345,0.000011521793,0.003282534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930835,0.000056718272,0.00020431151,0.00015383314,0.00012406564,0.00015271289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906,0.00026830615,0.0000953971,0.00039751784,0.00013212647,0.000046668876],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005236976,0.00009191275,0.00019720777,0.000039004,0.00008708773,0.00002578595,0.00017111299,0.000060615792,0.0010619864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030128728,0.00007401337,0.00009964912,0.000018391027,0.0007721492,0.00010081228,0.000039331255,0.0003141175,0.00007340099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017138811,0.0001474167,0.0030131529,0.00007696738,0.00003528703,0.0000018269831,0.023916773,3.1565287e-7,0.007753117,0.96055865,0.0002140197,0.0042653196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058554456,0.00015293696,0.004847581,0.000060283877,0.00009747719,0.0000044729672,0.004887514,0.00004400441,0.02124124,0.17812389,0.78949887,0.00045617053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008270128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006979306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7892849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000046204473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000520701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172009470","doi":"10.1017/s0012217310000041","title":"The Limits of Internalism: A Case Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Externalism; Presumption; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.09161990156836854,"score_gpt":0.3120470316840336,"score_spread":0.22042713011566506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172009470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9740359,0.000053997548,0.0000038741714,0.00030106973,0.0027222005,0.00015315338,0.000020770105,0.000020315596,0.022688719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99670094,0.0000062525387,0.000007563786,0.00014225492,0.0007706556,0.000014078963,0.0000029546607,0.00000887791,0.0023463946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943703,0.00008097405,0.0001798623,0.00009767794,0.00008609323,0.0001183589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999143,0.00034806435,0.000086339045,0.00026482748,0.00012797948,0.000029783585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004305228,0.00007260173,0.00012886208,0.000022673214,0.00026456278,0.0000577174,0.0001649291,0.00003506171,0.00005749889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012617276,0.00004534033,0.00006825956,0.000013069172,0.0004831422,0.000049464383,0.000032927986,0.00028952234,0.000028940805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018084604,0.00035118707,0.0023066655,0.000017496155,0.00011452618,0.0003579726,0.24012905,2.7326254e-7,0.0003183896,0.74946886,0.0020372744,0.0048802164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015494284,0.0009855045,0.0014448127,0.000027433074,0.00025327253,0.00041849693,0.17792836,0.00003562393,0.0012722573,0.05413966,0.76145524,0.0004899413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038856003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1209964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75941795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002421765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022155748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89504313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181526211","doi":"10.29173/irie214","title":"Government Secrecy, the Ethics of Wikileaks, and the Fifth Estate","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Review of Information Ethics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Fourth Estate; Public interest; Political science; Government (linguistics); Journalism; Estate; Public relations; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.07159690985232728,"score_gpt":0.3225260801470421,"score_spread":0.25092917029471484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181526211","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007896362,0.037821148,0.0029175584,0.541867,0.0048708073,0.0018950369,0.00050246605,0.000045058747,0.40218455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7241305,0.22104909,0.00015820834,0.052760396,0.00054188166,0.00005741877,0.00007040573,0.000012265685,0.0012198337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977321,0.00045662513,0.0006591139,0.000043344404,0.000996262,0.0001125231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941622,0.004095394,0.00077770784,0.00026357637,0.00067728,0.000023811332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010798307,0.000104298175,0.00020733543,0.000015893678,0.0002979716,0.000050559247,0.00048270723,0.000075399985,0.00018502711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034447033,0.000045672736,0.00012004279,0.000031823827,0.0014775634,0.00052688865,0.000137714,0.0010522935,0.00002715472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018594823,0.000011356736,0.000017868653,0.0011136584,0.0000681572,1.2505498e-8,0.12531623,0.0000039059296,8.9274494e-7,0.86782867,0.0013247572,0.004295921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002572403,0.000019446672,0.00015483912,0.001127613,0.00009218549,0.000005125296,0.008468876,0.00014337375,0.00005840352,0.021071274,0.9685315,0.000070132235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002169188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000109130066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9672067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028110164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010716651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5444144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182859523","doi":"","title":"A pragma-dialectical default on the question of truth","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Epistemology; Criticism; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05861650614167141,"score_gpt":0.2945879025731903,"score_spread":0.23597139643151888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182859523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37530205,0.000010995133,0.000033812346,0.0010712676,0.001550122,0.00011613046,0.000009927779,0.000042206437,0.6218635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964115,0.0000039395436,0.0000705869,0.0012201564,0.00056486577,0.000010911588,0.000005635324,0.000004994645,0.0017074016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994018,0.000044469227,0.00019641538,0.00006910395,0.00013671289,0.00015148726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991646,0.00041418074,0.00009874972,0.00017600742,0.00011642143,0.000030079374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047094192,0.000083792744,0.00011792559,0.00003322058,0.00017994396,0.000042352433,0.00013509722,0.00008554809,0.00051510957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045791615,0.00004773786,0.000073035844,0.000020255493,0.00057547435,0.00013213564,0.000023367533,0.0004549304,0.00019298111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002393119,0.000035392135,0.000038833066,0.000014064946,0.000009392919,0.0000012723726,0.003947285,0.000002623223,0.00008788392,0.99453986,0.00033030348,0.0009691758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005052505,0.0010058274,0.0020050327,0.000039038692,0.00006030878,0.000024546143,0.0037592223,0.00028668556,0.0022009474,0.22335899,0.76643884,0.00031530726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012471563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004788764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77118087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000057531615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004027523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5640089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190559544","doi":"10.1080/0092623x.2015.1106763","title":"A Review of \"Tolerance of Uncertainty\"","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.19952226018164654,"score_gpt":0.3817107811412678,"score_spread":0.18218852095962124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190559544","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000120156565,0.9851149,0.0000021450678,0.00009614125,0.0010968784,0.00033589767,0.00008569628,0.0000051661127,0.013251213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000015248476,0.9962934,0.00007021943,0.00041328536,0.0013924604,0.0000055653163,0.0000149123,0.000041015785,0.0017538957],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688303,0.00041647407,0.0018867498,0.00015110144,0.00047345585,0.00018915907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946652,0.00029730977,0.0033664966,0.00034327758,0.0012358928,0.00009183522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020942914,0.0003432073,0.0035996987,0.00016152953,0.000045764566,0.000025276939,0.0005582202,0.00018311052,0.0003068518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008359839,0.00022247146,0.0013373686,0.000084444284,0.000533041,0.00015754074,0.00003550155,0.0007756839,0.0000068747513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029980869,0.00019478725,7.787867e-7,0.085361205,0.0006304289,0.000011261546,0.0026355044,4.2396655e-7,5.838368e-7,0.00660971,0.008636119,0.8958892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029728672,0.00049225596,1.3486668e-7,0.08760673,0.00036644994,0.000055483306,0.00021544429,2.1404408e-7,7.718386e-7,0.0029533217,0.9078367,0.00017524042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044724675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011126581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89920056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005374486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064318156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90721226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2192421421","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i4.4386","title":"Mizrahi and Seidel: Experts in Confusion.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expert opinion; Confusion; Epistemology; Key (lock); Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.16153640127224797,"score_gpt":0.28933537933286396,"score_spread":0.127798978060616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2192421421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46036154,0.00067114114,0.00001690659,0.0007448175,0.0007450632,0.00012869763,0.000007125897,0.000060311504,0.5372644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892094,0.000044678884,0.00009358519,0.003949115,0.0002585184,0.000010438458,0.000009925631,0.000006151258,0.006418182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993839,0.000026512505,0.00020714574,0.00008931026,0.00010444593,0.00018867609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996267,0.000051794294,0.000052559495,0.00010364295,0.00008544132,0.00007987127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029479995,0.00009466656,0.00015546265,0.000059985443,0.000081520106,0.00006470455,0.00007904335,0.00006849491,0.0001298274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006448272,0.000071912735,0.000027177588,0.000016830594,0.00031229883,0.000343187,0.000060394363,0.00013434753,0.00007259442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035764075,0.000036330835,0.0015426911,0.000028623414,0.000008558636,0.00001984222,0.103264436,0.000015656,0.000009291673,0.88632387,0.0054661515,0.0032488008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000840493,0.0001962265,0.0007422737,0.000021323576,0.000006993685,0.000015039777,0.022108318,0.00020143276,0.000034923985,0.030036489,0.94558245,0.00021402373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042857067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011639758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9401163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011051404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044465127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2932516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2194365097","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i4.4330","title":"Virtues, Evidence, and Ad Hominem Arguments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Epistemology; Legitimacy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemic virtue; Appeal; Philosophy; Character (mathematics); Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.19395576315062887,"score_gpt":0.30317661237687565,"score_spread":0.10922084922624678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2194365097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44067255,0.0034138053,0.000052724,0.00096513366,0.0018614277,0.00026515935,0.000022599323,0.00015317721,0.5525934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788987,0.00015449041,0.00018815338,0.0022154686,0.00035147154,0.0000109555185,0.000010276716,0.000007248541,0.018163215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993012,0.000026662769,0.0002035627,0.00010619002,0.00015795811,0.00020445076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994658,0.0000733904,0.00008287603,0.00013975256,0.00012593914,0.000112205555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000372244,0.00011455882,0.00015980827,0.00004840849,0.00014055478,0.00011897768,0.000121084195,0.000062706036,0.000121755096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011961553,0.000086696586,0.00003876011,0.000018040078,0.00036252374,0.00067001884,0.000077875644,0.00016297375,0.00030628085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008339088,0.000070992064,0.002714928,0.00010322592,0.000054906093,0.000017678429,0.04621361,0.000007941544,0.000018163666,0.9278272,0.0106517505,0.012236237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058107084,0.0005151249,0.0018102233,0.000061663035,0.00003750281,0.000014597507,0.00535112,0.00007879235,0.00005310287,0.039940923,0.9512778,0.00027808492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000092232505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020270442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.940626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013147488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004860234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39367226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200912703","doi":"10.1111/meta.12160","title":"Getting off the Wheel","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Attribution; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.17678346117820307,"score_gpt":0.28260890735972716,"score_spread":0.10582544618152409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200912703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040366217,0.0041439137,0.00004940147,0.024352489,0.0033125426,0.0002631333,0.000022995066,0.000189085,0.9273002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785012,0.000025180943,0.00017536277,0.0057022953,0.0045487396,0.000026589783,0.000011633936,0.000033479504,0.010975546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876076,0.00019921707,0.00025761375,0.00022173396,0.0002986313,0.0002620178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989281,0.00017197388,0.00012523727,0.00043772956,0.00023589101,0.00010105919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097058853,0.00017068554,0.00024696827,0.00006175344,0.00040751527,0.00014656773,0.0003433641,0.000058262733,0.00015801052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016890671,0.00010735906,0.00016950592,0.000049356742,0.0006705085,0.00019862769,0.00007890746,0.00034850347,0.00058895536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008480894,0.000043702945,0.00005673327,0.000013705411,0.00007954686,0.0000049753194,0.026813354,0.000004603247,0.000023459175,0.95997614,0.011217045,0.0017582445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018802432,0.000048469876,0.000023295826,0.0000069502685,0.00006380441,0.0000027538683,0.0022601064,0.000034370496,0.000056445802,0.33809334,0.65909046,0.00013195093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011435305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015817923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93813497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001819635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005267234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7570026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213350869","doi":"","title":"Deception, Disadvantage, and Democratic Deliberation: Aboriginal Strategies and Deliberative Institutions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Disadvantaged; Deception; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Political science; Persuasion; Solidarity; Rhetoric; Sociology; Social psychology; Democracy; Law and economics; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.03390672667657278,"score_gpt":0.3128211535632359,"score_spread":0.2789144268866631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213350869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9313299,0.019876556,0.021776622,0.0017828445,0.0009717991,0.0002147834,0.0000111349145,0.000062564366,0.023973783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98859745,0.006046316,0.00023478427,0.00024298986,0.0014271452,0.0000062682934,0.000008427936,0.0000137107445,0.003422896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983714,0.000116223455,0.00025194214,0.00013428055,0.0001363347,0.0009897711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994538,0.00007151706,0.00011391946,0.00008108785,0.00016087592,0.00011879635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074509677,0.00016543902,0.00017726784,0.0000729347,0.0011783544,0.00036585168,0.000068551344,0.000058309484,0.00007029423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021317182,0.0001350749,0.000043388085,0.000032718566,0.0005903119,0.001920202,0.0000142629815,0.0010122901,0.000015350106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000117787795,0.000044358738,0.00047361947,0.000010544046,0.00008183201,6.812342e-7,0.014775675,0.0000061401647,0.000052140458,0.98173267,0.00012819539,0.0026823797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006966869,0.0003199758,0.001142476,0.000031630963,0.00018013432,0.0006629862,0.08219447,0.000039327955,0.000027673545,0.8464091,0.067939594,0.00035595827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048455833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005540791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13532357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012894763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011562514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9063068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229666405","doi":"","title":"Trudy Govier , The Philosophy of Argument . Reviewed by","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cégep de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.09986515626382288,"score_gpt":0.25144744209197323,"score_spread":0.15158228582815036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229666405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031886979,0.008207063,0.00001715505,0.0110655045,0.00050428166,0.00024009301,0.000024570103,0.000031458447,0.97672117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8257649,0.0019605823,0.000056984638,0.0056688543,0.00069903233,0.000025260742,0.0000075993844,0.000017121285,0.16579965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992871,0.00008759452,0.00024528478,0.000115945026,0.00013994846,0.0001241155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994276,0.000096757896,0.00009932909,0.00027355098,0.00007620532,0.000026546857],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002498558,0.000095223346,0.00020175579,0.000013909429,0.0001491739,0.000023809082,0.00016046285,0.000030166064,0.0066462997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023665558,0.000052762018,0.00011723288,0.000018522182,0.00042516817,0.00006173922,0.000023010096,0.00012878746,0.00026932344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001579492,0.00010143749,0.000015489868,0.00005952261,0.000038886254,2.7967423e-7,0.008160778,1.0300852e-7,0.00003324876,0.8460882,0.14307895,0.0024215651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013931318,0.00006335115,0.0000056536906,0.000022663637,0.000038631748,4.1471608e-7,0.00061333313,0.000013081661,0.00018533657,0.024403442,0.9744352,0.000079569676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006755384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007440915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8313563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000070709407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003850437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99426174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237172662","doi":"","title":"Trust, in So Many Words","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03685049037616735,"score_gpt":0.24744134971473536,"score_spread":0.21059085933856803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237172662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.826869,0.0040262463,0.00012984015,0.0048726723,0.0068080234,0.00020958963,0.00022596565,0.000059188336,0.15679948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98726356,0.0001687888,0.0000838495,0.0057112346,0.0016910959,0.000004424257,0.00006693064,0.000032088592,0.004978026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983645,0.00017256007,0.0004072638,0.00010952008,0.00029024144,0.00065589923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990285,0.00014669265,0.00016257576,0.00016001171,0.00018199235,0.00032021647],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063829974,0.00018200111,0.00025301665,0.00016899714,0.0008513302,0.00020696968,0.00021577938,0.000065971384,0.0010152798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039062208,0.00015779964,0.000069174646,0.000089428824,0.0004295392,0.0003424423,0.00002837402,0.00087509607,0.000014771056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026148815,0.00008992093,0.0023333465,0.000040847368,0.00010608629,0.000121211015,0.03700854,0.00008982672,0.0000071238856,0.92199695,0.03704738,0.001132607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003765769,0.00003267666,0.00041442097,0.000039392606,0.00003192249,0.00006046228,0.015253858,0.000091393485,0.000027102396,0.007130291,0.9763285,0.00021340682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49893963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9461208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9392811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023412243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003246312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253989905","doi":"10.1177/0048393115613570","title":"On the Hidden Thought Experiments of Economic Theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Epistemology; Presentation (obstetrics); Positive economics; Formal description; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24039315092660887,"score_gpt":0.3515014101262487,"score_spread":0.11110825919963982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253989905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34120587,0.00020624546,7.406949e-7,0.011132911,0.0013360751,0.00011594619,0.000017316615,0.000009010085,0.6459759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974604,0.0000037137636,0.000008911297,0.0005784968,0.0008715886,0.0000045985125,2.1736312e-7,0.000003664466,0.0010683964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991651,0.00023917278,0.0001518165,0.000106633335,0.00022763711,0.00010964373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935764,0.0002451565,0.00020378055,0.00013162913,0.000045317945,0.000016485996],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011277014,0.0000696828,0.00013830855,0.000020318786,0.00057748286,0.000026730382,0.0006149396,0.000027723125,0.00009363653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000750063,0.000034816825,0.00012851332,0.000029771109,0.004087025,0.00008671996,0.000075949196,0.00008536539,0.000018672878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009598029,0.000027198768,0.00003075517,0.0000037980565,0.000015951995,2.3864091e-8,0.045460217,0.00000200714,0.000026610485,0.95301867,0.0013031991,0.00010198152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007512753,0.000068027686,0.000040809664,0.000011237127,0.000012141939,6.407811e-8,0.0075928527,0.0000031814084,0.0014246173,0.9882443,0.0024802207,0.000047450125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013083735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004498875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65625453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018708479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008969448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259059179","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-21103-9_5","title":"Conductive Argumentation, Degrees of Confidence, and the Communication of Uncertainty","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Argumentation library","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Obligation; Epistemology; Position (finance); Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.08968408533064168,"score_gpt":0.2707410418836537,"score_spread":0.18105695655301204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259059179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026896913,0.006317195,0.000020833228,0.0021169425,0.00040064112,0.00082531426,0.00038306104,0.00004188507,0.98720443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3170279,0.0035134298,0.00086936215,0.000861443,0.0002592366,0.00005597033,0.001693686,0.000071920644,0.6756471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881923,0.00016306808,0.0005366352,0.00016392801,0.00023989344,0.00007723525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791205,0.000564516,0.0008746956,0.00032159826,0.00029287647,0.000034287394],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034316853,0.0001758561,0.00039543267,0.0001010224,0.00013787807,0.000051234554,0.00021735783,0.00010474059,0.0011073521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026656126,0.00013094414,0.00009322947,0.000014406724,0.0027848794,0.00064895005,0.00008569388,0.00021903864,0.000011868726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009033857,0.000014994642,0.000022916467,0.00008853777,0.00017730247,2.0209227e-7,0.03752475,0.000016236985,0.0000052980317,0.95500743,0.0065821805,0.0004698341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015232202,0.00011362961,0.00004710526,0.00021876078,0.0002789675,0.0000016634997,0.0154309925,0.000052047715,0.0001616325,0.8666697,0.11530266,0.00019959437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002768822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012784346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3143382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000125926435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011616008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270106044","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2016.01.004","title":"Vision, knowledge, and assertion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Consciousness and Cognition","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Assertion; Attribution; Psychology; Perception; Object (grammar); Social psychology; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.031437683380987444,"score_gpt":0.27327609775244305,"score_spread":0.2418384143714556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270106044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91090775,0.0023403347,0.0008698994,0.0022578875,0.000972323,0.00021085018,0.000042048287,0.00012261902,0.08227627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954502,0.00045411437,0.000011022566,0.0002075623,0.00029778123,0.00001770728,0.000008838569,0.000009044125,0.0035437236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999472,0.000055286062,0.00012399761,0.00017890024,0.00005420793,0.00011557391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994698,0.0001553963,0.000049387345,0.00007099199,0.00020156997,0.00005283597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017230028,0.0000903664,0.00012141679,0.00004742361,0.00030252786,0.00007728213,0.000027721922,0.00005595195,0.00015147407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039980976,0.00005990985,0.000023593586,0.00001371772,0.00055421994,0.00022571256,0.000024296492,0.00005493293,0.000052991887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042325082,0.00012663253,0.0012373179,0.0001302685,0.000042344698,0.000003386508,0.009482377,8.98441e-9,0.0041083544,0.6520766,0.002411764,0.33033863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031527434,0.0005110577,0.015313852,0.000721658,0.0002839062,0.000033342858,0.005795225,0.000049438026,0.0026523557,0.5133138,0.45739457,0.0007780514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001576576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005772739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45498282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000053442855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017934412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24430527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270115566","doi":"10.1561/107.00000009","title":"Meta-Rationality in Cognitive Science","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Behavior","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Ecological rationality; Great Rationality Debate; Epistemology; Cognition; Principle of rationality; Psychology; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.4114615557399521,"score_gpt":0.38542586922342364,"score_spread":0.026035686516528433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270115566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792407,0.0003168391,0.000014382219,0.00041604557,0.0010074575,0.00008020796,0.0000093518165,0.0000063775265,0.018908648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997817,0.000006892296,0.00029002046,0.00016679113,0.00044956515,0.0000056612057,9.370445e-7,0.000006205225,0.0012569192],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983579,0.0004160561,0.00045015546,0.00010749033,0.00050601154,0.00016242349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975184,0.0006037759,0.0003946558,0.00007323663,0.001304889,0.00010501105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014639345,0.00008635769,0.0002793334,0.00017095785,0.00013935956,0.000111426474,0.00018038665,0.000032187767,0.00026766825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022560556,0.00006464786,0.00013316447,0.000068362635,0.0007378474,0.0004455044,0.0000354502,0.00038074504,0.000006194931],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044629895,0.00684077,0.46857178,0.0003133833,0.0021356998,0.0013964135,0.3284907,0.000065744345,0.005024468,0.13347283,0.015955398,0.033269826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008154509,0.0015845704,0.74873316,0.0008229421,0.011765281,0.0005438391,0.11410153,0.00007291385,0.0034792689,0.021356383,0.08772039,0.0016652183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057730398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019651274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28016138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006802565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045396693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5073734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271316954","doi":"","title":"Beyond Questionable Certainties","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.08435286807289265,"score_gpt":0.2566685653317343,"score_spread":0.17231569725884166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271316954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2839918,0.0018236036,0.0000011796675,0.0005566042,0.0025106966,0.00015406392,0.00007307615,0.000089555855,0.7107994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9171591,0.00011026724,0.00006383672,0.0028749767,0.00062194956,0.0000925155,0.000007316804,0.000022803924,0.07904727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989279,0.00004886653,0.00018048652,0.0002056469,0.000096476746,0.00054062344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915224,0.000070406066,0.000055992303,0.00019837086,0.00029391507,0.0002290553],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002406684,0.00016693489,0.00027377796,0.00015824032,0.000763656,0.000046593832,0.00015088593,0.000051384326,0.0013962467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109127686,0.00014990916,0.00005657964,0.000036438603,0.0009995009,0.00016010458,0.00003173154,0.00016118682,0.00026597444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032450084,0.0000110253095,0.00027574942,0.000042444062,0.00016062756,0.00001567734,0.24263294,2.2324437e-7,9.052714e-7,0.75017726,0.0065552904,0.00012458708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011068451,0.000086715394,0.00012503042,0.000018031973,0.000025968944,0.0000016261278,0.30762106,6.8834396e-7,0.00001859171,0.4007894,0.29098043,0.0002217599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010774454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25025812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63316727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002551797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022772067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283539597","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12264","title":"Relativism, Retraction, and Evidence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Taste; Citation; Epistemology; Psychology; History; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.5960111162237574,"score_gpt":0.4148227171307891,"score_spread":0.18118839909296824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283539597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10615295,0.009169138,0.00008015928,0.0674237,0.0003607969,0.0003614951,0.000018151133,0.000111262314,0.8163223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903482,0.0028251403,0.000047036043,0.00025678746,0.00092365546,0.000026795602,7.114471e-7,0.0000094222305,0.0055622407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983534,0.0004044438,0.00018623848,0.00038848483,0.00031150982,0.0003559054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99676794,0.0025923324,0.000045472043,0.00020435103,0.00024587213,0.00014402534],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016416167,0.000118044234,0.00018988387,0.000103338294,0.0006687859,0.0001004454,0.00014204046,0.00013645337,0.0005340998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011176288,0.00006677921,0.00003063803,0.000056410154,0.0029661607,0.00036089605,0.00015385832,0.00060600654,0.00012760908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007053404,0.00004336769,0.00045371128,0.000047136164,0.000018628973,0.00000569211,0.004106566,1.4843437e-8,0.00014593183,0.98660016,0.00029224047,0.008216024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019180603,0.00049153937,0.0005949945,0.00011755953,0.000006341865,0.0000036959811,0.00043713648,0.0000017071874,0.000013925408,0.93491036,0.06311921,0.00011175006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032946053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016767928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88419527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027296735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002694149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997472},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2284672934","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/9pcqk","title":"An Open and Shut Case: Epistemic Closure in the Manifest Image","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Epistemology; Ambivalence; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12290814369156448,"score_gpt":0.3216421648689699,"score_spread":0.1987340211774054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284672934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58154774,0.00024374228,0.000022973485,0.027002571,0.000179724,0.0004927091,0.00004227939,0.000052912157,0.39041537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98949337,0.000025055428,0.00012212213,0.0078409,0.0004379245,0.000014077844,0.0000118337375,0.000012476019,0.0020422607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999183,0.00019791875,0.0001761285,0.00021565951,0.00007892339,0.00014839947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995254,0.00012351548,0.00004353894,0.00020881937,0.000040412728,0.000058302845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004554598,0.000106907544,0.00016971574,0.000016477892,0.00023729367,0.0004261374,0.00034908493,0.000045372686,0.0004098476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025065152,0.00006843552,0.000024731451,0.000023996661,0.00032437764,0.00035193004,0.00008561005,0.000257325,0.000047967023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014143125,0.000054673495,0.0008960635,0.00006785449,0.000012358113,0.00070144376,0.103766985,2.8722607e-7,0.00012101417,0.88939375,0.0046184952,0.00035295685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023904983,0.0014110195,0.0034945966,0.000066312954,0.00015068323,0.0015529928,0.40456223,0.00054087414,0.00019209922,0.08579916,0.4988449,0.0009946406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022189824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016136544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8035946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005242809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.900457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298495033","doi":"","title":"Emotion Does Not Have to Cause Harm to an Argument","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"York University Digital Library (York University)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Harm; Unit (ring theory); Public relations; Academic community; Sociology; Political science; Public policy; Public administration; Management; Psychology; Social science; Economics; Law; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.039674685070143205,"score_gpt":0.2042375596541849,"score_spread":0.1645628745840417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298495033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54312754,0.000010693555,0.00034575685,0.0056974413,0.0006399165,0.0005359543,0.0012131626,0.00068063237,0.44774887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7601327,0.000010560146,0.00030002475,0.0020072705,0.00032202186,6.964629e-8,0.00020349206,0.00002094172,0.23700294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984558,0.00009586581,0.0001562421,0.0005822889,0.00025197925,0.0004578086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987366,0.00006673637,0.00009900829,0.00044823872,0.00007874287,0.0005706638],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000046075333,0.0003043827,0.00031597726,0.0006132914,0.00068598334,0.00052228,0.00073227513,0.00013331347,0.000377034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000112146845,0.00032136106,0.00019513677,0.0002844198,0.0002401825,0.0036966887,0.0002461663,0.00026979903,0.00034639344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094763597,0.0008434675,0.0017736778,0.000038782793,0.000191205,0.0006087855,0.03857501,0.0001372504,0.00013708259,0.9152889,0.034016076,0.0074421186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053519855,0.0006383029,0.0008218117,0.000050850165,0.00007766122,0.000002281819,0.039005432,0.000009301412,0.00040344518,0.001490287,0.95643777,0.00052767666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000091290174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025258787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9224217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014105042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011012463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2304176691","doi":"","title":"Commentary on Godden","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0577851769983521,"score_gpt":0.24113857192459956,"score_spread":0.18335339492624747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2304176691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8668937,0.000108654196,0.0000113570795,0.01008369,0.00059224793,0.00017292473,0.00007686353,0.00009278716,0.121967785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9607486,0.000071900686,0.00011354371,0.0042050364,0.000501051,3.6968356e-7,0.00006717328,0.000026433372,0.034265883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847525,0.00022436601,0.00018111961,0.00036594036,0.00037735625,0.00037594428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880034,0.00018876417,0.00019172364,0.00048825837,0.0001679223,0.00016301335],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005260337,0.00022346176,0.00035321116,0.00020611653,0.0009753526,0.000046475616,0.00056717254,0.00016720263,0.003659486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036133875,0.00025850645,0.00025938914,0.0000926265,0.00083912007,0.0005736101,0.00018114716,0.0005999442,0.0007571359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029941725,0.0025512988,0.20597517,0.00041371345,0.0014182354,0.0007998303,0.20292768,0.00006799706,0.0036592346,0.35128316,0.21593158,0.011977906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017750561,0.0004446906,0.025250165,0.00011243311,0.0001593649,0.000010943931,0.013552869,0.0000113013875,0.0004011688,0.0075283884,0.95025635,0.0004972677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000471262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030344722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73432475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102068945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035055506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313633624","doi":"10.2307/2653426","title":"Virtue Epistemology and the Epistemology of Virtue","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemic virtue; Epistemology; Philosophy; Meta-epistemology; Philosophy of mind; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Social epistemology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.18229631021101286,"score_gpt":0.3442842049268116,"score_spread":0.16198789471579875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313633624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14556345,0.005208658,0.000008831025,0.022210816,0.00017231509,0.00050873717,0.000042162777,0.0000393736,0.82624567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924458,0.0012600332,0.000038717273,0.0008872275,0.0006467759,0.000071120885,0.000008078662,0.00001627764,0.004625918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964678,0.001726561,0.00048202576,0.0004917693,0.00032754603,0.00050429476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596936,0.003153342,0.00009485356,0.0004097462,0.00022965287,0.00014305135],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029113016,0.00021727318,0.0006366292,0.00013515119,0.000845806,0.00007273367,0.00041334293,0.00022958174,0.0013648272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034459532,0.00013049263,0.000100590674,0.000107987165,0.015350862,0.00010375038,0.00022553677,0.0010282219,0.00010108079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006420985,0.00012315999,0.00009401821,0.00010284227,0.0000771586,0.000010870379,0.006139568,0.0000011443426,0.000016866341,0.98681295,0.00009028742,0.0058890386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012193497,0.0008175193,0.0001297541,0.00002193189,0.000023753299,0.000025586243,0.0010328228,0.00003405014,0.000010282133,0.9615395,0.03499834,0.00014711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026845207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005537506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8468824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018489125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004316072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313683257","doi":"10.1177/171516350714001s02","title":"A Skeptic's Collaborative Experience","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pharmacists Association","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06481746601098676,"score_gpt":0.2915163502584931,"score_spread":0.22669888424750634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313683257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88708866,0.002402652,0.00023112868,0.00034581427,0.013105928,0.00051289744,0.0007150668,0.000071317336,0.09552654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98434275,0.0009917998,0.00014313469,0.0051270635,0.0034208824,0.000011932859,0.000018144267,0.000053035503,0.005891225],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970615,0.00015706658,0.0006623921,0.00037989428,0.0004561783,0.0012829489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577576,0.0002199044,0.00030940905,0.00023996196,0.0013027597,0.0021521994],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010433769,0.00038041366,0.00039890246,0.0003422855,0.0020480012,0.00040633293,0.0006372924,0.000069330876,0.0025620388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020856793,0.00038773895,0.00014750812,0.000300922,0.001082753,0.00057794654,0.00003309824,0.0008962467,0.000040075003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036699133,0.00020998227,0.0016347009,0.00039879535,0.0008118811,0.1862128,0.45604885,0.00025557788,0.0037600403,0.057550434,0.162181,0.13056895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001071589,0.000059517723,0.000009557725,0.000019230194,0.00009840594,0.06407374,0.0015821183,0.00014001767,0.0023137536,0.0006536515,0.92927957,0.0006988726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04491122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6971793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76709855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016149735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039410256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317644171","doi":"10.1017/s0012217313000656","title":"Lotteries, Knowledge, and Irrelevant Alternatives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Assertion; Epistemology; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.0467119708768763,"score_gpt":0.25889552336611943,"score_spread":0.21218355248924314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317644171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62556374,0.0029235159,0.00007547437,0.001932937,0.0029471905,0.00035145186,0.00007077837,0.0001411885,0.3659937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98265636,0.00018682107,0.00005858185,0.0006204642,0.0010657056,0.000035280835,0.00003153302,0.00001574764,0.015329496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941176,0.000062113286,0.00013612148,0.00016198753,0.000055518893,0.00017249622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951917,0.00014101634,0.000046933386,0.00013018055,0.0001043981,0.00005829043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010120797,0.000109537476,0.00016210989,0.00003929494,0.00017220512,0.00011612871,0.00009087239,0.000040752362,0.0005006568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004113615,0.00008770596,0.000038041257,0.000011195949,0.00059361156,0.00019661609,0.000048956375,0.0001303248,0.0006058333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044235812,0.00009533275,0.00079354167,0.00007421294,0.000059585236,0.0000035714622,0.08907149,1.7249076e-7,0.00030924485,0.872747,0.024075128,0.012766288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028844093,0.00009196538,0.003882258,0.000026951817,0.000020720889,0.0000026709263,0.0021910688,0.000035636283,0.00023864786,0.08594793,0.90704536,0.00022833723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008305171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014907016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8829703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007646589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018124649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77869636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320056789","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzs032","title":"Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity, by John Greco.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemic virtue; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04099503176027172,"score_gpt":0.2752202346472124,"score_spread":0.23422520288694068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320056789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8146097,0.0027331016,0.00008853208,0.0003654918,0.0012303767,0.00014751556,0.000079749174,0.00002135232,0.18072417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910207,0.00003266131,0.000050015136,0.00010636181,0.0006527356,0.000011841707,0.000020128344,0.000022414755,0.00808318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998873,0.00017305168,0.00033926024,0.00014594327,0.00014502955,0.00032373925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903005,0.00030533774,0.00020189182,0.0002654556,0.00011290898,0.00008436018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081050524,0.00017329311,0.0003235731,0.00007411424,0.00019674185,0.000047280777,0.00019912394,0.00009715525,0.00087069336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000077482146,0.00014978048,0.00012349906,0.000036523812,0.00069517887,0.00033849853,0.00008113821,0.00026945892,0.00045130122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003551043,0.000835828,0.0060183033,0.00078675046,0.00016399946,0.0000013984833,0.20381533,7.8631723e-7,0.004721947,0.754587,0.01342837,0.015604785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009829521,0.00028328874,0.001604056,0.0003702734,0.00030316727,0.000021442183,0.012263964,0.00007259822,0.0108206095,0.017284462,0.9550883,0.0009048595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008185261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022833336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003723797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037990918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95334816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320808839","doi":"10.1215/00318108-2683576","title":"When Truth Gives Out","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Epistemology; Normative; Rationality; Irish; Property (philosophy); Analytic philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Subject (documents); Sociology; Aesthetics; Contemporary philosophy; Linguistics; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.15160631348221734,"score_gpt":0.3153493341004285,"score_spread":0.16374302061821114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320808839","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018002301,0.03863095,0.0000772957,0.6154137,0.0009635479,0.00032338768,0.0000114528575,0.00009597872,0.34430364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8838941,0.03276949,0.00008856993,0.066409715,0.0082555525,0.0000796861,0.000021534232,0.000055371678,0.008425967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986008,0.00042400727,0.00032432473,0.0002131457,0.00021468682,0.0002230474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851483,0.00065372104,0.00012266978,0.0005315462,0.00009433555,0.000082923994],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011042309,0.00016876373,0.0004385152,0.000016175922,0.00028795554,0.00005087621,0.0004158227,0.000050289764,0.0010254453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006381478,0.0000929196,0.00023185655,0.000017263197,0.0007863573,0.00007522585,0.00007364995,0.0004144075,0.0013464451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027786475,0.000028093249,0.0000012696172,0.00057108875,0.000025194004,5.641592e-7,0.0022412466,4.811555e-8,0.0000016955325,0.98795104,0.0024435392,0.006733466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005220352,0.00003427114,0.0000035927612,0.00038441026,0.00007701373,0.0000011695935,0.000016183738,0.0000036374784,0.0000018845925,0.5528531,0.44649547,0.000077023156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000112941425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026428483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8837141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008647515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018394934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322233634","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01714.x","title":"Distant Peers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Epistemology; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.23389744417782146,"score_gpt":0.24805714729496037,"score_spread":0.014159703117138905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322233634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02391746,0.0004815066,0.000085560016,0.0009825871,0.00237708,0.00015017853,0.000034862933,0.00017225745,0.9717985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98938787,0.000021143627,0.00039267863,0.0011830514,0.0010757832,0.000019310099,0.00001441444,0.000031303,0.0078744525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998942,0.00008269009,0.00025099033,0.00026497885,0.00019646912,0.0002628828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992513,0.00004885044,0.00009839963,0.00038247945,0.00012494334,0.00009403802],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029231622,0.0001816561,0.00027262417,0.000094432056,0.00026733143,0.00004815535,0.00024523458,0.0000596349,0.0019809424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035055775,0.00014754407,0.00020916743,0.000039853247,0.00068697217,0.00019151393,0.000043211687,0.00023228202,0.00066275697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017454006,0.00009702185,0.00010950632,0.000024444285,0.00008870683,0.000012864857,0.030113276,7.427776e-8,0.000037524955,0.9677528,0.0013832389,0.00036309942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019309775,0.00010523451,0.000117754396,0.000008914662,0.00009897778,0.0000019923298,0.0014851051,0.0000036715096,0.00041048683,0.60370636,0.39363956,0.00022880353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019803923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001620581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96547043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013072421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021130398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324823836","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i1.4294","title":"Being a Correct Presumption vs. Being Presumably the Case","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Correctness; Presumption; Epistemology; Modal; Order (exchange); Speech act; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Economics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.055784847355519786,"score_gpt":0.261305293653185,"score_spread":0.20552044629766522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324823836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3829273,0.000110041365,0.00047048877,0.0015388374,0.0020908818,0.0003747349,0.000031107822,0.00020716706,0.61224943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98172617,0.00004449443,0.000034401834,0.0012277638,0.0007783602,0.000030080568,0.000005431633,0.000011297938,0.016142016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990333,0.00007640627,0.00029346716,0.0001386839,0.00013138373,0.00032677798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990737,0.00035940902,0.00013546472,0.00026879655,0.000112861926,0.000049763097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005134602,0.00014945731,0.00016019435,0.00004765284,0.0006773943,0.00014589688,0.00019256078,0.00007860869,0.00038744658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013359358,0.00007408593,0.00011113898,0.00002098118,0.00047110478,0.00063917827,0.00008555751,0.00021599169,0.00031876663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005832568,0.000020477039,0.00036423438,0.000044229047,0.000042838517,0.00010985323,0.029335959,0.0000091722595,0.00005580529,0.9418887,0.0017916687,0.026278717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010335136,0.0004543465,0.001002135,0.00016092787,0.00012788836,0.00058498076,0.0051651206,0.00026228657,0.0006639993,0.082491525,0.9075185,0.0005347784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030498818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009956857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90572685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022978775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033154134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5210038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334047895","doi":"10.1017/s0012217313000711","title":"Les raisons épistémiques sont-elles instrumentales?","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07566229811969474,"score_gpt":0.28578859417235025,"score_spread":0.2101262960526555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334047895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3757919,0.031227764,0.00022421041,0.030983761,0.012453527,0.0011029965,0.0010527745,0.00032260077,0.5468405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9073772,0.0022972801,0.00034800824,0.001425613,0.0035729546,0.00010887421,0.00027052927,0.00006756681,0.084531985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977798,0.00037429866,0.0004814576,0.00041398898,0.00019902078,0.0007514712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860686,0.0003457614,0.00020915073,0.0003983149,0.00021723734,0.00022267428],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036525622,0.00038857752,0.0004997935,0.00009808088,0.0009036888,0.0004137333,0.0003208112,0.0003704592,0.0050885295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104951054,0.00037815323,0.00030956598,0.00004292127,0.0024994717,0.00050204044,0.00011901647,0.0005948315,0.003014617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007154484,0.0002888165,0.0017017861,0.00024321883,0.00015514297,0.000010913784,0.016484836,0.0000014878203,0.00011023503,0.9017638,0.044265207,0.03496741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044050993,0.0001910097,0.002781284,0.000197476,0.00011594828,0.000009771071,0.0068155467,0.000038630926,0.0004630155,0.079456374,0.90897983,0.00051057525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048353527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019864917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8647147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011140376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012067888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335090607","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i1.4469","title":"Denying the Antecedent: The Fallacy That Never Was, or Sometimes Isn’t?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); sort; Section (typography); Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Positive economics; Computer science; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.13073839555469155,"score_gpt":0.27912212409223525,"score_spread":0.1483837285375437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335090607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20425092,0.00188375,0.00054625084,0.031838946,0.0043027466,0.00090992416,0.00007848273,0.00036611507,0.75582284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91203415,0.00029444232,0.000023702056,0.007885476,0.0008165091,0.000025668593,0.0000030403467,0.000013746355,0.07890327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989234,0.00007437507,0.00025034507,0.00012923447,0.0002360465,0.00038654867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876976,0.0005806104,0.000149659,0.0003679775,0.000090291134,0.00004168867],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005392908,0.00017621822,0.00017893816,0.000038976363,0.0008556585,0.00020128407,0.0005252369,0.00007585795,0.0020234922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011308218,0.000057506306,0.00014075013,0.000032055046,0.0011440141,0.00079608336,0.0001559497,0.0002413159,0.0007537066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006533827,0.0000264896,0.0005632176,0.0000314724,0.00008691802,0.000007422438,0.033867948,0.0000033354559,0.00003848606,0.9401224,0.009219235,0.015967706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035995166,0.00011220631,0.0012083902,0.000045043704,0.000040644725,0.000019801122,0.011854272,0.000013953272,0.00024719976,0.012636175,0.9732635,0.00019884491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012651067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005975303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9640443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018551871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056997942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335807053","doi":"10.1075/ld.5.2.02col","title":"Disagreement and the speaker’s point of view","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Utterance; Assertion; Meaning (existential); Dialogic; Linguistics; Conversation; Perspective (graphical); Value (mathematics); Point (geometry); Truth value; Normative; Psychology; Function (biology); Relativism; Truth condition; Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05636213227530506,"score_gpt":0.26306258807132754,"score_spread":0.20670045579602248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335807053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74010026,0.03053226,0.00007465158,0.005194481,0.0008940684,0.00043139668,0.0000876825,0.000040317438,0.22264488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961404,0.00022743721,0.000028239394,0.0013035916,0.00038943448,0.0000060198818,0.000015083917,0.0000053263307,0.00188447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954563,0.00008008259,0.00012487291,0.00008611748,0.0000758768,0.000087430475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996191,0.000118650365,0.000052229156,0.00012747392,0.00003766737,0.00004484404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004225914,0.00006730515,0.00017334263,0.000013736501,0.00006343722,0.000032577187,0.000051109724,0.000022935,0.000053448613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065704626,0.00003769041,0.00003255904,0.000009161392,0.0006437537,0.000052356187,0.000046034602,0.00006827442,0.000008682264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039272105,0.000027831185,0.00016623763,0.00006325583,0.00003291971,0.000005978158,0.29307345,1.5979663e-7,0.000021227748,0.69952095,0.0021695476,0.0048791543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008267545,0.0005162626,0.0012163732,0.00017892859,0.00041641179,0.000020127172,0.26684362,0.000060702238,0.0006646121,0.3123631,0.40886533,0.0005869698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018017042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034557136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4066958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000029495895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012463304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27236497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337315440","doi":"10.1080/09515089.2015.1065314","title":"Knowledge, certainty, and assertion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Assertion; Certainty; Norm (philosophy); Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16230429036707034,"score_gpt":0.37073504930790435,"score_spread":0.20843075894083402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337315440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093296036,0.0009338637,0.00050446065,0.26773912,0.0025741213,0.0001977467,0.000022479197,0.0001934879,0.6345387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99285287,0.00012818999,0.000033095843,0.002666108,0.0020817094,0.000016319396,0.0000028047614,0.000018908446,0.0022000067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893373,0.0001641191,0.00022931631,0.0003479934,0.00007397116,0.00025083884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918157,0.0002881298,0.000062564905,0.00025231778,0.00010968438,0.00010573209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002707463,0.00014220907,0.0002272821,0.00007668093,0.00016328736,0.000022735132,0.00013444263,0.00016140266,0.0006653968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001057786,0.000091651586,0.00006827764,0.000022784541,0.0011799609,0.00010921264,0.000045701563,0.00021541947,0.0005428097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004118078,0.00013288128,0.00022372871,0.0000120277,0.000027610664,0.0000038579874,0.0014171833,7.979859e-9,0.00073371606,0.9809414,0.0024262266,0.014040162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054641016,0.00016728742,0.0011695111,0.000016685472,0.000017502587,0.000011177586,0.00002966896,0.0000017678572,0.000033781533,0.79672575,0.20115024,0.00013020076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012990462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014213056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8995568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012546155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012903263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72856283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338011633","doi":"","title":"Deep Disagreement, Rational Resolutions, and Critical Thinking","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Epistemology; Key (lock); Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06903815881425727,"score_gpt":0.296677684418392,"score_spread":0.2276395256041347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338011633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05162849,0.0016226139,0.0053200866,0.013482603,0.0011967288,0.00025442636,0.000040978928,0.00020767233,0.9262464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98972946,0.000037787897,0.0016269521,0.004709736,0.0011331134,0.000010063778,0.000028845421,0.0000049783534,0.0027190705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932927,0.000024606814,0.00020703103,0.00009144235,0.00014920252,0.00019844435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958944,0.0001503196,0.000038540868,0.00008791727,0.000083646984,0.000050151026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002582428,0.00008545607,0.00009753905,0.000037949376,0.0006228587,0.00013548753,0.00008259968,0.000051744246,0.0006685593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010390819,0.00006949953,0.000040106548,0.000012116239,0.0005341748,0.0005631498,0.00005487085,0.00018135714,0.00014156307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006735544,0.000023363273,0.00021753578,0.00001776514,0.000008806018,0.000001243564,0.014472124,0.000025628296,0.0000027281108,0.98249966,0.00089124276,0.0018331415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034493871,0.00013882943,0.0016135112,0.000018931158,0.00003442188,0.000022522641,0.0034673451,0.002292649,0.000017915738,0.1487831,0.84302145,0.000244388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019966466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043734378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.938101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000125999795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024413928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73202556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342721975","doi":"10.1111/nous.12132","title":"Truth Incorporated","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Noûs","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Pragmatic theory of truth; Value (mathematics); Truth value; Alethiology; Dialectic; Perspective (graphical); Coherence theory of truth; Semantic theory of truth; Cognition; Field (mathematics); Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2759284876211445,"score_gpt":0.2893217167283361,"score_spread":0.013393229107191595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342721975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10505451,0.00018350006,0.000053044416,0.0007569801,0.0026525424,0.000070969465,0.000016640653,0.00013474321,0.89107704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97340846,0.00000317275,0.00012386379,0.00069198763,0.0010341238,0.000004956447,0.000020360087,0.000012492793,0.02470056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994936,0.000046857698,0.0001134732,0.00010953562,0.000109418004,0.00012709852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949485,0.000047336704,0.000054863758,0.00015006676,0.00017640939,0.00007647317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023209023,0.000073161675,0.00011854726,0.000030207932,0.00008805822,0.000050838375,0.000091343856,0.000045987326,0.00031521058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007428018,0.00006020215,0.000036306858,0.000020118747,0.00023491993,0.000099363286,0.000021166032,0.0001325458,0.0006910475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010290751,0.00004077295,0.00016342149,0.000009729049,0.000016705788,0.000008174438,0.0177965,0.0000034302461,0.0000149227035,0.95581114,0.025183503,0.0009414166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000377566,0.00009723833,0.000058806403,0.000007971388,0.000018802826,0.0000024357191,0.0033793317,0.000052066578,0.00017578938,0.15207529,0.8436155,0.00013923376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002081075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041490598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86835396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013326077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000766454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8882248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346631310","doi":"10.3998/ergo.12405314.0003.008","title":"A New Paradigm for Epistemology From Reliabilism to Abilism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; University of Waterloo; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1834604714436106,"score_gpt":0.39416729191176164,"score_spread":0.21070682046815103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346631310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49935436,0.0018210215,0.023313243,0.356346,0.021888243,0.0036458378,0.00079908525,0.00013175378,0.09270045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702296,0.00007472488,0.0051073087,0.006180407,0.012900022,0.000037311278,0.000011718791,0.00008058149,0.0053783185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787027,0.00023439023,0.000890922,0.00038839685,0.0002678247,0.00034819715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970336,0.0007949713,0.0007106813,0.0005442304,0.0004710423,0.00044548803],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090862956,0.0002646026,0.0007505614,0.00019767974,0.00028787617,0.00076311576,0.0029465621,0.00013315471,0.0013079161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034684574,0.00017242052,0.00024508568,0.00005579366,0.0002957859,0.002979297,0.00039424747,0.00026344313,0.0000738165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007457979,0.00019505713,0.0002503694,0.000031353637,0.00017901702,0.000023150511,0.008136902,0.0000066852576,0.0005014223,0.9451619,0.035296492,0.009471855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013479266,0.00086393836,0.0002660913,0.00014505046,0.000070423586,0.00001161847,0.00009892774,0.0000011009535,0.0002795691,0.7437454,0.25294593,0.00022401118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073572504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069207203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47087526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007462258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003316197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2361290106","doi":"","title":"On the View of James Robert Brown's on Thought Experiments","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ziran bianzhengfa yanjiu","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalism; Philosophy; Epistemology; A priori and a posteriori; Thought experiment; Field (mathematics); Environmental ethics; Classics; History; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10641305794265854,"score_gpt":0.29353106461356593,"score_spread":0.1871180066709074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2361290106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33202586,0.005819051,0.000031042604,0.0035635338,0.0040171077,0.00066333817,0.00007574831,0.00014543426,0.65365887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97904694,0.00012555996,0.000041564614,0.0042642034,0.0012318991,0.00003153805,0.000011339753,0.000042685897,0.015204297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984637,0.00025325862,0.00032610598,0.00021752201,0.0003280763,0.00041135613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985722,0.0005071566,0.0001746581,0.00057034957,0.00008269929,0.00009296952],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005152227,0.00024934058,0.0003469544,0.00006979938,0.00036466698,0.000055286102,0.00032220987,0.00009515432,0.0016235295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008528058,0.0001579867,0.00020813498,0.0000487398,0.00051380444,0.00017440783,0.000048094233,0.00034281754,0.00048266063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036892066,0.00036840496,0.00011229404,0.00005675605,0.00008873779,8.616271e-7,0.037480973,0.0000019055713,0.00036120278,0.9375363,0.021950379,0.0020052989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003807002,0.00025516364,0.00032248217,0.00018262009,0.00005282209,0.000001261697,0.0047721807,0.0000046059686,0.013479431,0.006819095,0.9734463,0.00028331365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017758275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006330166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95149595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025174675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022796956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2377025835","doi":"","title":"Agreeing to Disagree","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hunan University of Science & Technology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Prevention of Organ Failure","funders":"","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Common knowledge (logic); Law and economics; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Physics","score_opus":0.020447434338599593,"score_gpt":0.2162057012369398,"score_spread":0.1957582668983402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2377025835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95831454,0.00006895839,0.0008064607,0.0044703945,0.000402946,0.000044108925,0.000003026473,0.000022155584,0.03586742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968392,0.000012930838,0.0011776325,0.0000578037,0.000099034725,1.3766922e-8,1.0711316e-7,0.0000027001051,0.0018105424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992312,0.000011733784,0.00018273141,0.000118237775,0.00025257017,0.0002035248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989565,0.000030119509,0.0003034428,0.0001525913,0.00050547416,0.0000518594],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004883546,0.000065793865,0.00021117303,0.0009669962,0.00044044864,0.00002136933,0.0007643319,0.000058952046,0.000057442434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061415114,0.00006178681,0.0000790438,0.00034589448,0.005318224,0.00033818337,0.00012387637,0.00022286679,0.000012606221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029733766,0.000104242434,0.0034320955,0.000013742725,0.000014997834,0.000060037382,0.0071707047,0.000052603322,0.019804401,0.9631553,0.0014747911,0.0046872967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011325484,0.0020795867,0.008751571,0.00024744557,0.00013545928,0.00015179579,0.10433389,0.000035525412,0.015292879,0.15633848,0.71104234,0.0004584591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020316963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061906176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8068169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006121819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014467089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2409494481","doi":"10.47925/2015.273","title":"Counteracting Epistemic Totality and Weakening Mental Rigidities: The Antitotalitarian Nature of Wonderment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Chemistry","score_opus":0.08140904244587957,"score_gpt":0.31785963290251384,"score_spread":0.23645059045663427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2409494481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89726406,0.0014973906,0.0000028199238,0.0070821666,0.0027917156,0.00020311588,0.000041701416,0.000011668139,0.09110533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823284,0.000023178412,0.00006280101,0.00025672946,0.0009440861,0.0000092809605,0.000034858764,0.000008045054,0.00042820285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992257,0.000092297516,0.00027427112,0.00013147898,0.00018455311,0.00009169357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911344,0.0001366821,0.0002904369,0.00017902149,0.00024197932,0.000038457238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044675297,0.00009589194,0.00017032892,0.000043288583,0.00016056487,0.000031446147,0.000098212666,0.000056272755,0.000025462397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008796047,0.00007369639,0.00005186013,0.000023699233,0.00047702395,0.00022156996,0.000028121754,0.00021134973,0.0000019257789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021625125,0.00015884709,0.0012478466,0.00020414739,0.000053988257,9.414229e-8,0.11856007,0.0000012884922,0.00030807167,0.8779042,0.0012108847,0.00032898525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050546706,0.0002265982,0.0018410779,0.00042020253,0.00012638641,0.0000151903705,0.14666757,0.00004695364,0.0016051704,0.81759995,0.030676028,0.0002694293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005544038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006951129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100968726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041537187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015729174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30052516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2413561503","doi":"10.12978/jat.2016-4.122413150417a","title":"John Stackhouse’s Vocation-Centered Epistemology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Analytic Theology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.05676491895392546,"score_gpt":0.2786996993982315,"score_spread":0.22193478044430606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2413561503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6621247,0.0024719262,0.03211543,0.07966019,0.01654414,0.00043160314,0.00007846552,0.00013803491,0.20643553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97805643,0.00017903492,0.00019463754,0.0010275211,0.0014377796,0.0000013680419,0.0000011949041,0.000020339354,0.019081673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826455,0.00034849448,0.0007460903,0.0001615178,0.00017225705,0.00030709468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752045,0.0007235895,0.00077048375,0.0002741867,0.00060360087,0.00010766643],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009823187,0.00015827212,0.0005447745,0.00025160305,0.00013299608,0.0000271879,0.000361884,0.00012260713,0.0018992921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037728157,0.00009310549,0.0002718855,0.000037229496,0.0011289055,0.00020852058,0.000043296102,0.00026068857,0.00018155246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001708279,0.00016577721,0.001771296,0.000028962642,0.00047240587,0.00007927754,0.006114708,0.0000024406818,0.0009462984,0.9785007,0.008876998,0.0028702973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030703582,0.0016517248,0.0017103999,0.00014157363,0.00049658224,0.0007071739,0.0026844325,0.000017746817,0.00069732586,0.48659796,0.5018196,0.0004051138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035734854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003564562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49294263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006858499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017496594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467380273","doi":"10.1093/analys/anw043","title":"<i>Assertion: on the Philosophical Significance of Assertoric Speech</i>By Sanford G. Goldberg","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05649360545132209,"score_gpt":0.26099393978031865,"score_spread":0.20450033432899656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467380273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5609654,0.0007107472,0.0015762186,0.12036031,0.0012652278,0.00050752255,0.0003705736,0.00019552688,0.31404844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872813,0.0000930339,0.000014245125,0.0009297418,0.00045817686,0.000015336347,0.000014561001,0.000011031469,0.0111825345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988424,0.00014170186,0.00031004165,0.00023241065,0.00028951908,0.00018391809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984948,0.0006150777,0.00019153945,0.00045802278,0.00019270729,0.0000478699],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040879656,0.00013855637,0.00033451512,0.000093266746,0.00018467501,0.00003252204,0.00026362162,0.00007014029,0.0012417954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007234361,0.000070631904,0.00035901953,0.00020872855,0.00043321078,0.000096959906,0.000021771193,0.0001401367,0.000115139694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030101013,0.000151544,0.0012009583,0.000016407384,0.0012120814,0.0000025359352,0.0015908014,0.0000037197694,0.0023383347,0.9820761,0.009460668,0.0019167565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009187926,0.00070437323,0.0018631717,0.0001342594,0.0049060844,0.0000014084312,0.0027436856,0.00012921351,0.040744483,0.26700547,0.6798413,0.0010077847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029160842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071255193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7150706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027604492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025809397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468793022","doi":"10.1017/s0953820816000170","title":"Effort and Achievement","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Competence (human resources); Distributive justice; Epistemology; Distributive property; Positive economics; Sociology; Economic Justice; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05411237397655988,"score_gpt":0.25748381885523397,"score_spread":0.2033714448786741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468793022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7405575,0.00092753523,0.00007153969,0.005884038,0.0009999586,0.00016716713,0.000053701366,0.00009577151,0.25124282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733483,0.000047873033,0.000044008302,0.000560552,0.0003000529,0.000007201482,0.00000218841,0.0000073332367,0.02568245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953365,0.000020068726,0.00010430884,0.0001302586,0.00007302598,0.00013867868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967396,0.000080791084,0.000024187957,0.00014308217,0.000035522833,0.000042470037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001869791,0.00007065468,0.000097041884,0.000021084667,0.00012789352,0.000020901458,0.000054281325,0.000027934308,0.0005790723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020372512,0.00004183395,0.000034629928,0.000005167568,0.00039837646,0.00007926836,0.000032787455,0.000048658916,0.00013959993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008340131,0.000043622687,0.0016028584,0.000022574857,0.000028654873,0.0000016083452,0.006740219,7.804867e-9,0.00011581591,0.97525716,0.0046784636,0.011500698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002448813,0.00010363006,0.0021411718,0.000020960782,0.000017359707,8.2139707e-7,0.0008108609,0.000001261324,0.00020738508,0.04661875,0.9497448,0.000088106455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000062707535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000286133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94506633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000895948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010647367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6340436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474203456","doi":"10.1111/nous.12160","title":"Reconsidering Intentions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Noûs","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Agency (philosophy); Action (physics); Epistemology; Economic Justice; Ecological rationality; Computer science; Psychology; Economics; Philosophy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.25890184482554673,"score_gpt":0.2808807652306056,"score_spread":0.021978920405058888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474203456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16627488,0.00018482235,0.00075231184,0.008459701,0.0032719274,0.000095231226,0.00002568051,0.0001871272,0.8207483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94279957,0.000023401808,0.000106817344,0.00043844135,0.00057352,0.0000071424683,8.8747106e-7,0.000008706468,0.056041505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961287,0.00002198559,0.00009938124,0.0000934704,0.0000586772,0.00011362902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999637,0.000099834935,0.000030936684,0.0001290798,0.000075749536,0.000027415192],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011845646,0.000050091414,0.000075500335,0.000028198401,0.00014004405,0.000028256478,0.00005619002,0.000025791694,0.0014550368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076076365,0.00003213955,0.000056760717,0.0000066773014,0.00022662393,0.00010631522,0.000018667663,0.00006151308,0.0005271848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028671957,0.000026206411,0.00031939358,0.000013809934,0.000029667477,0.0000028839092,0.010271316,8.8158735e-8,0.0022323853,0.9620157,0.008298058,0.016787643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017687162,0.00002903899,0.00017076076,0.000052253356,0.0000149020225,0.0000029975429,0.0012728407,0.000001736613,0.0012886724,0.084267646,0.91261584,0.00010647385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028895836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015380544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90431774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011433709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019791083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W24743767","doi":"10.1007/978-90-481-2381-0_1","title":"Mental Transparency, Direct Sensation, and the Unity of the Cartesian Mind","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in the history of philosophy of mind","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Sensation; Cartesian coordinate system; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Geometry; Computer security","score_opus":0.14527492739262626,"score_gpt":0.27416024771737413,"score_spread":0.12888532032474787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W24743767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003012066,0.042384405,9.857955e-8,0.00240663,0.0017208064,0.0004962624,0.0002009474,0.0000023468558,0.9497764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.887342,0.0016681988,0.000016137707,0.00024064297,0.00058465253,0.0000086320515,0.0000095416835,0.000021998752,0.11010821],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852276,0.0002448273,0.00057937735,0.00019888037,0.0003454264,0.00010875496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981441,0.0005268647,0.00067887106,0.0004395258,0.00019753065,0.0000131059805],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008827472,0.00025549842,0.0007521677,0.00008210149,0.00022324182,0.0000026691164,0.00036494815,0.00010875727,0.00005885293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005162779,0.00013819533,0.00029048545,0.000012433369,0.012239971,0.00003410656,0.000045075896,0.00038887325,0.0000010079075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093108676,0.0000620226,0.000009728769,0.0003422363,0.00041831646,0.0000016086359,0.514454,8.377902e-7,0.000008564238,0.48018843,0.0030856982,0.0013354257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010902517,0.00027138917,0.000065568296,0.0007516255,0.00086489227,0.000004225379,0.011800806,0.0000010881683,0.000051727402,0.49435127,0.4904603,0.00028685108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011684354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013463814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8843299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101197846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008698946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9904481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477333637","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511973499.005","title":"FROM COST–BENEFIT ANALYSIS TO ETHICS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.1281805563729595,"score_gpt":0.2472813004462426,"score_spread":0.11910074407328311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477333637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016966969,0.00014002778,0.0005900636,0.00008865095,0.0009254343,0.00040399385,0.0026225161,0.0001606051,0.99489903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017669736,0.00010679065,0.00008046252,0.0007786063,0.0009240659,0.0000015825541,0.00032963557,0.00006233706,0.99594957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982125,0.00007696425,0.00028645727,0.0007222099,0.00035405485,0.00034781318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759746,0.0003075095,0.0003077378,0.0009198684,0.0005803281,0.0002870816],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023029301,0.00048327039,0.00083333976,0.00042180796,0.0005294573,0.00011032176,0.00073168176,0.0007378486,0.00022023669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021682883,0.0005541268,0.0006700674,0.000009579065,0.0007770909,0.00009485864,0.00037759525,0.001482298,0.00017599354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069949565,0.00001344715,0.0000015136216,0.000038945258,0.0022539503,0.00008758451,0.013200559,0.000002947559,0.000002669949,0.9656627,0.018117588,0.0005481479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022784692,0.000051518608,0.000010152007,0.00008179246,0.0038765303,5.060979e-7,0.00054473145,0.000005571164,0.000043779237,0.0011815846,0.9933597,0.0006162957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008605745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018535294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9752421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013642677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012592787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477656499","doi":"10.11647/obp.0083.03","title":"3. Objections and Replies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; National Endowment for the Humanities","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0784390136909983,"score_gpt":0.2653694012196088,"score_spread":0.18693038752861046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477656499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000033265692,0.0013674708,0.0000033703755,0.0038711047,0.0018814983,0.00044366802,0.00013637867,0.000082970226,0.9922102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011440928,0.000325541,0.00003939998,0.0024259873,0.0012321232,0.000036093228,0.000048231108,0.00008141589,0.9956968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866414,0.000029181683,0.00032552585,0.00053577655,0.0001902719,0.00025507936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998606,0.00015663602,0.00026276193,0.0005963666,0.00025223865,0.00012597912],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038909397,0.00032379586,0.0004799833,0.0001350752,0.00058280723,0.002985117,0.0005337654,0.00028944385,0.011057824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056683948,0.0002543127,0.000136991,0.0000054429106,0.0012875249,0.0024989333,0.00037349525,0.0004899574,0.00037724536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000666934,0.0000053625217,0.0000012569398,0.000023427478,0.00010987369,0.0000037878237,0.0021092736,1.11416085e-8,0.0000010673452,0.6818834,0.31333762,0.002518282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019344981,0.00004950582,0.000001533154,0.000121298246,0.0000751187,0.0000048482843,0.0005240172,9.7277265e-8,0.0000022459337,0.18167545,0.81705034,0.00030211292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027236846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019662294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5037127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057860307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021174092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W248404143","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-5934-3_8","title":"Bi-Level Virtue Epistemology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemic virtue; Virtue; Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology of Wikipedia; Meta-epistemology; Social epistemology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.12706995796281878,"score_gpt":0.2599633051427643,"score_spread":0.1328933471799455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W248404143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016115322,0.0006831154,0.00010516858,0.0013486549,0.0034592883,0.00034639204,0.0001713058,0.00018994093,0.99368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019886792,0.00016805998,0.0002227593,0.0033197028,0.0028983513,0.000024519482,0.0001403152,0.00012025626,0.99111736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982474,0.000046906647,0.000571788,0.0005321613,0.00024005224,0.00036169775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982636,0.00027101376,0.00032645647,0.00064321584,0.00036459707,0.00013112795],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002406252,0.0005297485,0.0008182385,0.00018075935,0.00029979734,0.00013062816,0.00038863282,0.00069257035,0.048329428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025536836,0.00043535893,0.00038356485,0.0000045940246,0.0014715035,0.00013470608,0.0001317841,0.00089341914,0.019954177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042281854,0.000016372165,7.0216595e-7,0.00009180094,0.00016444805,0.000016213806,0.0013257692,1.0604198e-7,0.0000032876515,0.8955415,0.10055292,0.0022826556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011431312,0.000068783134,0.000001997205,0.000045289697,0.00007367388,0.000009232253,0.0001282852,0.0000022322047,0.0000057020557,0.34908953,0.65009946,0.00036150357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056386524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023566114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54954654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004930219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011752841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2488997023","doi":"","title":"You gotta believe","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.021422950916222563,"score_gpt":0.23848623432181998,"score_spread":0.2170632834055974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2488997023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27781585,0.009594178,0.009951475,0.013961742,0.0067576654,0.0003240028,0.00001527039,0.00028431267,0.6812955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.939815,0.0010354482,0.000032880544,0.00083798915,0.0038732733,0.0000029662735,0.0000049491146,0.000029933437,0.054367583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975802,0.0001537369,0.00026341225,0.00016646514,0.00020752374,0.0016287066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993353,0.000083992585,0.00015831279,0.00019348618,0.00014981268,0.0000791153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020743557,0.00015337743,0.00021731446,0.00007144705,0.000555778,0.00012634747,0.00028065563,0.00007290184,0.00022512297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008574342,0.00012535043,0.00016179278,0.000024854853,0.00025053378,0.00018844155,0.00002719694,0.0020519705,0.00027859656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010609736,0.000036625806,0.00009978703,0.000006412583,0.000090613066,7.722343e-7,0.0034765096,0.0000021097728,0.000034031335,0.98380345,0.00085328263,0.011585815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028234345,0.00024869063,0.000025892215,0.000009431826,0.000036661844,0.00006213975,0.0030481792,0.000017380724,0.000022041666,0.59356755,0.40254843,0.0001312582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012559493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004993431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6619991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018713684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005756587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89149046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492220561","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511811654.015","title":"Beyond Belief: Probability, Dynamics, and Intention","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamics (music); Connection (principal bundle); Computer science; Belief revision; Epistemology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045938766061272666,"score_gpt":0.20224254315101783,"score_spread":0.15630377708974516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492220561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000661097,0.0003353367,0.000050926978,0.00006319662,0.000702207,0.0004365438,0.0005236081,0.00012994806,0.99709713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037632766,0.0004759605,0.00004628119,0.000115444105,0.00031297223,8.195977e-7,0.00019055772,0.00004421252,0.9950505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987658,0.000051821593,0.00022681439,0.0005138493,0.00019913913,0.00024255888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988026,0.000075914504,0.00024291826,0.000412721,0.000341953,0.00012388354],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012947431,0.00035627044,0.00046310542,0.00014148033,0.0005174018,0.00007124342,0.00026911573,0.0003527471,0.000021007367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011447206,0.00040419964,0.00022616381,0.0000020538325,0.0021314167,0.00013101568,0.00031630677,0.0006648642,0.000014244127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000355647,0.000017378417,0.0000040330733,0.00021722737,0.00014905402,0.000067620975,0.0016955066,1.3364078e-7,0.0000014728771,0.9802237,0.016289491,0.0012988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038967445,0.00009862782,0.0000119252245,0.0001279637,0.00026651804,0.000019116747,0.00029701143,0.000041838335,0.000009514667,0.002550183,0.99572396,0.000463687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005002289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045173685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97943443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017566961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007659718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496029585","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4670","title":"Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are still Weak: A Reply to Seidel","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Epistemology; Philosophy; Medicine; Intensive care medicine","score_opus":0.08802790957842942,"score_gpt":0.28870144220549887,"score_spread":0.20067353262706944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496029585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21657911,0.0017596412,0.003369517,0.05649208,0.01561409,0.0014205346,0.0010855108,0.00093218626,0.70274734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8248857,0.0003123277,0.00078025553,0.14819889,0.003631035,0.00010910049,0.00007897301,0.00004239323,0.021961287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988656,0.000035903784,0.00034035183,0.0002163138,0.00020901264,0.00033281528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991202,0.00012345826,0.00015677085,0.00033888224,0.00013690899,0.00012381299],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017147062,0.00018115694,0.00023648854,0.00006733598,0.00017460347,0.000093617804,0.00024382862,0.00008359198,0.0009710553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011584603,0.00011316834,0.00010215515,0.000022824586,0.00018429213,0.00046029474,0.00011539377,0.00012813427,0.0010134989],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028284956,0.00019871577,0.0021279592,0.00005615985,0.00019007197,0.000017640194,0.08628731,0.000011268257,0.00059176685,0.4724608,0.40998527,0.027790166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038736087,0.00015981308,0.00079744455,0.00009859233,0.000005204098,0.0000013925404,0.0023513783,0.000005850199,0.00025117825,0.00817882,0.9875489,0.00021408725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011442447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042375393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6807861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034039098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029797944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496468702","doi":"10.1007/s11098-016-0731-2","title":"Everybody needs to know?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of language; Conceptual framework; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17060004977510965,"score_gpt":0.3346420372139278,"score_spread":0.16404198743881818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496468702","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0956374,0.0059180534,0.00010790963,0.6386496,0.0041076588,0.00046538832,0.000084486615,0.000410341,0.25461915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97842354,0.00047063775,0.000042904478,0.0044915956,0.004068444,0.000051232088,0.0000010479094,0.000021646814,0.012428954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988828,0.000071589275,0.00025701875,0.00024558452,0.00021869002,0.00032434086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987995,0.0005022597,0.000052341788,0.0002451343,0.0002795141,0.0001212328],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025114897,0.0001932841,0.00036803054,0.000092747425,0.00038839274,0.000032373333,0.00019262871,0.000058968966,0.00026429995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004113854,0.00011060452,0.00012575947,0.000055207027,0.000852381,0.00012183797,0.00017748514,0.00014620833,0.0012783661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024181665,0.000059345002,0.00014616433,0.000027847303,0.00015303968,0.000004633864,0.013378723,1.5596255e-7,0.00021631083,0.96837515,0.015132866,0.0024815686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019597613,0.00014453576,0.00007351579,0.000063359854,0.000034267774,9.0259095e-7,0.000980914,1.4549448e-7,0.000083407365,0.49228618,0.5059639,0.00017288652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018027615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011692281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88278615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043899938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015745432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498487844","doi":"10.5840/cpsem200127","title":"On Belief Limitations in the Normative and Natural Sciences","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Semiotics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Psychology; Natural science; Sociology; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.1363830830337813,"score_gpt":0.2829735806283707,"score_spread":0.1465904975945894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498487844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00055154046,0.0007727108,0.0000022556862,0.0022432972,0.0006256082,0.00014815805,0.0000342101,0.0000146356815,0.99560755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22245489,0.0017476476,0.00008510182,0.006258161,0.0009537625,0.0000043107716,0.000049770555,0.000027204082,0.76841915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992573,0.000044385968,0.00018831927,0.00016316943,0.0002017326,0.00014505633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985129,0.0011340376,0.000117639865,0.00013899078,0.000077818506,0.000018612322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035663284,0.00016295625,0.00018993582,0.000104145685,0.00039981832,0.000115295974,0.00018276968,0.000105294595,0.000051044753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009158389,0.00010662186,0.000055951674,0.000013089424,0.0013940604,0.000076525124,0.000028085868,0.0006550216,0.000048286867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018898958,0.000012208899,0.0000038126566,0.000020877673,0.000013895699,0.0000046652463,0.032561593,0.0000064690616,1.2823048e-7,0.96394587,0.0027706507,0.0006579386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007692686,0.00011635043,0.000036765377,0.00011863455,0.000030118643,0.000003884291,0.0037879169,0.000036929017,6.161675e-7,0.56870514,0.42693958,0.00014713503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028969047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030148977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4241689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018673816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044306365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5136474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498910725","doi":"10.1163/18758185-01302002","title":"Defending Shah’s Evidentialism from his Pragmatist Critics: the Carnapian Link","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Pragmatism","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Pragmatism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Opposition (politics); Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09576828534889088,"score_gpt":0.27423479391983446,"score_spread":0.1784665085709436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498910725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10326829,0.03773692,0.010724536,0.15588029,0.025704645,0.0029863217,0.0025820173,0.0014400706,0.6596769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729369,0.00020328873,0.0002304953,0.0027805804,0.003568478,0.0000914452,0.00007608773,0.00007186609,0.02004084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731135,0.0006088424,0.0007491007,0.0004914382,0.0004153974,0.0004238388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665403,0.0016981381,0.00040985012,0.0008536565,0.00023411198,0.0001502115],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008854833,0.00035769446,0.000495313,0.00009819944,0.000860452,0.00040397872,0.00068175886,0.00017844974,0.0017844798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047173098,0.00021383411,0.00024830402,0.000041802352,0.0014264163,0.001086382,0.00017820645,0.00042375067,0.00072935387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018576722,0.000045298446,0.00053170073,0.00008247058,0.0002469197,0.00006659772,0.04214185,1.7842599e-7,0.0005547681,0.85553676,0.08800416,0.012770726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008697014,0.00006809561,0.00063009403,0.0005514447,0.00010789346,0.000010636313,0.0032752068,0.000022148592,0.00031130004,0.12238561,0.87130684,0.0004610345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002011833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015128049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8696686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006545043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017933811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2499506438","doi":"10.7767/boehlau.9783205793656.ack","title":"Acknowledgements And Dedication","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Böhlau Verlag eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Science and Engineering Research Board; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Download; Cover (algebra); Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.05836819594992175,"score_gpt":0.24769153338881605,"score_spread":0.1893233374388943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2499506438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001253554,0.00050583924,0.000058360103,0.00007671542,0.001957066,0.00025765863,0.000036652786,0.00009628963,0.9968861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003918003,0.000071719696,0.0000454337,0.0006732838,0.0029492073,0.000016331309,0.000064514395,0.0000702182,0.9921913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988684,0.00003012789,0.00031197048,0.0003684641,0.0002155751,0.0002054817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988572,0.00009559538,0.00024569355,0.00038040688,0.0003249521,0.00009617231],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025197995,0.00030835552,0.00038643053,0.000109528635,0.00029544873,0.000104054445,0.00018180077,0.00029429776,0.0025600374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036714813,0.0002913615,0.00012240431,0.0000014707246,0.0007794015,0.00003549202,0.000094219824,0.0004047114,0.0023324015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073385036,0.0000058850865,0.0000036734407,0.00015872624,0.00009629801,0.0000022543663,0.004274926,1.4155909e-8,0.000004744082,0.9412996,0.033042397,0.021104142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022113361,0.00007101759,0.000009007332,0.00013918625,0.00014775764,0.00000132365,0.000059074682,0.0000032576334,0.000013341651,0.10595421,0.8931016,0.00027910795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011507094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007292527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8600592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003234743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007087224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2499849929","doi":"10.1017/s0034412516000202","title":"Indirect epistemic reasons and religious belief","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religious Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Absurdity; Epistemology; Normative; Philosophy; Religious belief; Psychology","score_opus":0.060558183299239544,"score_gpt":0.2878282442080933,"score_spread":0.22727006090885374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2499849929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6301817,0.21675937,0.000031591666,0.028525412,0.0038618832,0.00071441353,0.00014851826,0.00085499714,0.11892206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.895252,0.088620774,0.000080250524,0.0007380399,0.0010805569,0.00004932766,0.0000025648615,0.000039685292,0.014136799],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984677,0.00011336071,0.00035598787,0.00042581253,0.00020366392,0.00043348662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983709,0.0007477761,0.00016964626,0.00034925347,0.00027228572,0.00009012919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003964073,0.000282138,0.0005583361,0.00010419861,0.00057800463,0.000055790766,0.00015237306,0.000099840356,0.000009665858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037822936,0.00017680576,0.00012649591,0.000039936982,0.0014640399,0.00010250122,0.00015479818,0.00017657773,0.0001873173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008161005,0.00013096511,0.0048984187,0.00043085008,0.0013794706,0.00009177218,0.19217208,3.3712783e-7,0.00075299595,0.34921572,0.4359063,0.01493947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010146847,0.00038536862,0.00029372924,0.00060394005,0.00026381973,0.000062288156,0.009116066,6.2532064e-7,0.000477529,0.27555528,0.71155196,0.0006747237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023890093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014069211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27564564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006780922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004260383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7209929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503233496","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3642831","title":"Knowledge as Achievement, More or Less","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.08266020930281968,"score_gpt":0.30467414050248043,"score_spread":0.22201393119966073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503233496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8244611,0.009019194,0.00053085334,0.0042772917,0.0020688544,0.00023378426,0.00000981409,0.0001272477,0.15927188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8121412,0.00487548,0.000017083483,0.0005272416,0.0023044674,0.00000622908,0.0000056640088,0.000033650547,0.18008901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751055,0.000120440774,0.00030562724,0.00019192383,0.00021042784,0.0016610245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992714,0.000092692935,0.000161155,0.00018499143,0.00019188545,0.00009790309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008893156,0.00019543088,0.00026156948,0.000101951926,0.0010815428,0.00006705705,0.00031676583,0.00008079814,0.0003203566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005645835,0.00014298657,0.00017574988,0.000046984,0.0004863661,0.00023323076,0.000040525687,0.0021123877,0.00029362843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007012997,0.00019189739,0.00027431254,0.00001346472,0.00020601739,0.00002330968,0.021336434,0.0000013103382,0.00003032484,0.97147596,0.001840658,0.0045361957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012798922,0.0009703224,0.00016720695,0.000038600974,0.00010032516,0.001353911,0.043424238,0.000011343192,0.00011373656,0.35659045,0.595521,0.000429006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002021862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010425641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6148855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030427717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024910448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91773903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503619367","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.016","title":"Categorically different: unintended consequences of trust taxonomy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Unintended consequences; Taxonomy (biology); Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.08375159263136771,"score_gpt":0.2060125634055777,"score_spread":0.12226097077420998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503619367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023006991,0.00017060334,0.00008702579,0.000067447625,0.00064883917,0.0005267565,0.00047005454,0.000086638094,0.99771255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019837985,0.00013348348,0.000032570435,0.00009679809,0.00028639933,0.0000030894964,0.00008794094,0.000036577447,0.97948515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868524,0.00006996106,0.00032665514,0.0004168923,0.00022388548,0.00027739108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982268,0.00012548527,0.0005093786,0.00048151365,0.00051223673,0.00014457035],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006313533,0.00042054872,0.0007476767,0.00016953878,0.00025686325,0.000061858125,0.000564898,0.00034851982,0.00018984386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011375995,0.0004041989,0.00035054798,0.0000025659956,0.0052703563,0.000102647115,0.00021305794,0.00062842504,0.0000433682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037676684,0.000018593793,9.308295e-7,0.00018983934,0.00029640403,0.0000431875,0.0009446838,2.1889157e-7,0.000037635622,0.9785122,0.019421319,0.0004973082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036301353,0.000101543184,0.0000026843027,0.000119098135,0.00034917975,0.0000037397585,0.00089781685,0.000006384523,0.0002703073,0.0013652669,0.99610096,0.00042001376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014413539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053623957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9771469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009622731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014799344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2506174737","doi":"10.11647/obp.0083","title":"Knowledge and the Norm of Assertion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; National Endowment for the Humanities","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05981341063276695,"score_gpt":0.27961574667822997,"score_spread":0.219802336045463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2506174737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010566283,0.0035985087,0.0000035877827,0.0024739283,0.0013773654,0.0006653068,0.000046890833,0.000020812398,0.99180305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003713311,0.0002562608,0.000009428374,0.00081449584,0.00092402654,0.000049258404,0.000059275906,0.000043981738,0.9974719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876845,0.00015574716,0.00038699684,0.0003069395,0.00017997835,0.0002019034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981498,0.00047883662,0.00042069863,0.00048789574,0.00039922772,0.00006355506],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012330321,0.00024212938,0.0005844928,0.00008221799,0.00028489603,0.0012052733,0.00084528985,0.00024088557,0.001913785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010133454,0.00013718374,0.00016204022,0.000011997449,0.002230214,0.0017867091,0.0003737951,0.00041411017,0.000104810715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003180018,0.000012194713,0.0000016332708,0.00006829038,0.000094438685,3.792296e-7,0.005278349,7.913688e-9,5.459333e-7,0.53815514,0.45413214,0.0022250977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088611234,0.000043365693,0.000005078646,0.00019742045,0.00011416886,9.899863e-7,0.00041248865,8.1909883e-7,0.0000049007685,0.09011805,0.9080367,0.00017987419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026129308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019680983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4539046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006648496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060219667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510917024","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4621","title":"The Real Struggle: An Objective Notion of Expertise?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06397860815651764,"score_gpt":0.27931182389956416,"score_spread":0.21533321574304654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510917024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49640614,0.00008343718,0.00012419595,0.00038769926,0.0009973574,0.00015030819,0.000040037605,0.00006531717,0.5017455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99505097,0.00009504039,0.000020284731,0.00017875017,0.00036913608,0.000010597291,0.000004629476,0.0000050748176,0.004265517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936914,0.000046141417,0.00021770677,0.000075328884,0.000119710254,0.00017199249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934787,0.00014404082,0.00012976407,0.00018300819,0.00016294021,0.000032377906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024399355,0.00007998706,0.00011000225,0.000024061168,0.0002749379,0.000034686094,0.00014820059,0.000053827065,0.00011162923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052674965,0.00003742569,0.000058121685,0.000013010124,0.0006293204,0.0004478703,0.00003023488,0.00008065563,0.00004949729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048028433,0.000023004177,0.00021064185,0.000008342973,0.00001753174,6.011407e-7,0.031088538,0.0000012128335,0.00036708033,0.9320793,0.00015899092,0.035996687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00349421,0.0053995056,0.050946876,0.00021197295,0.00013389291,0.000018630946,0.09464075,0.00027789234,0.01913179,0.3583544,0.46601295,0.0013771396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025826803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011457518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.573725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016620506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035935795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23187573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511031155","doi":"","title":"Intentionality and the Aristotelian-Thomistic view of concepts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of mind and behavior","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Intentionality; Object (grammar); Essentialism; Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive science; Pessimism; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.053368738640769235,"score_gpt":0.2981929682930619,"score_spread":0.24482422965229267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511031155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941244,0.0024161518,0.00017398904,0.00069615553,0.0005138754,0.0001002457,0.0000150666465,0.0000015804943,0.0019585495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974766,0.00014657818,0.000039951407,0.00017755342,0.00036319392,0.0000016831038,8.905737e-7,0.0000043557934,0.0017891919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991752,0.0002253072,0.00032797543,0.000056947443,0.00013638918,0.00007816407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892336,0.00041344902,0.00031389634,0.0000970089,0.00021548447,0.000036791487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014370175,0.000076376666,0.00024537012,0.000020890586,0.00018686113,0.000034220986,0.000114882234,0.000034420664,0.00013079256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046291094,0.00003678426,0.000092868715,0.000011281418,0.001725068,0.000048436013,0.000025472054,0.00021745241,0.0000020543196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008444011,0.0011008439,0.013061986,0.0006363387,0.0004240821,0.000022222832,0.13095754,0.0000024866004,0.0021382784,0.6022217,0.004061658,0.24452841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008979404,0.0013326285,0.0692417,0.00065660046,0.005061195,0.000648193,0.030001149,0.00008713466,0.0006391569,0.075972974,0.80677944,0.0006004458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006744413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018505995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80271775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003895866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021701326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6356085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521535665","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4720","title":"An Epistemological Theory of Argumentation for Adversarial Legal Proceedings","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Adversarial system; Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06811105210042746,"score_gpt":0.28864140674621463,"score_spread":0.22053035464578719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521535665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75533646,0.000035487414,0.0046120016,0.00075223536,0.0016525508,0.0007488074,0.00015800858,0.00015652918,0.23654792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948329,0.000005434359,0.00044154277,0.0005263513,0.0006796649,0.000037870872,0.000018747918,0.0000075692105,0.003449951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991777,0.000024611263,0.00032841688,0.00012946912,0.00012329844,0.00021653168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923134,0.00018598037,0.00020438901,0.00008804251,0.00024208453,0.000048187972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061640114,0.000114541916,0.0001964498,0.00005130004,0.00015682155,0.00004505286,0.000167399,0.00009691523,0.00029206675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012233832,0.000066623514,0.00010827607,0.000014789711,0.000568226,0.0008422796,0.000022305972,0.00007494315,0.000027024158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029503615,0.000054760607,0.0002056779,0.00005414059,0.000021853832,4.6027594e-7,0.005360597,8.609918e-7,0.00086900586,0.98820496,0.00022802685,0.0047046263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039543775,0.004867494,0.0025198336,0.00008835456,0.00014897676,0.000016163474,0.013670137,0.000075153155,0.008120281,0.6857832,0.28013724,0.00061881717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017901284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022701299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30242178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016600125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036550784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3197926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522061514","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4725","title":"Errors of Reasoning, Naturalizing the Logic of Inference","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology","score_opus":0.08521820864784566,"score_gpt":0.2969468926641764,"score_spread":0.21172868401633074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522061514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53927183,0.00068371237,0.0002499507,0.0012131463,0.0010096611,0.0002096653,0.00004734693,0.000065765475,0.45724893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99640477,0.0000815242,0.00012142722,0.00051124115,0.000118815355,0.0000043436835,0.0000025392808,0.000004474838,0.0027508417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920577,0.00004331363,0.0003314023,0.000077039,0.00015441273,0.00018808343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989206,0.0003150192,0.0003076093,0.00022082556,0.00021193063,0.000023985369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036904242,0.00010302634,0.00020032687,0.00004278756,0.00012473625,0.00001527733,0.00027715397,0.000070048896,0.00034371237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029996372,0.000046068286,0.000102549435,0.000029683746,0.0010121809,0.0002684517,0.00007647202,0.0001533818,0.000036001413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001409942,0.000012868911,0.00074707123,0.00003950592,0.000018677838,5.8965026e-7,0.011630352,0.000004120371,0.0002439321,0.984001,0.0001848128,0.0031029687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022385924,0.0020449467,0.02338693,0.0014532601,0.0002327673,0.000027653728,0.031241026,0.00017883786,0.018876087,0.47475395,0.44433665,0.0012292829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016505412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020887573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50924706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007840174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042021722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37634093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524483968","doi":"10.1002/tht3.213","title":"Actionability Judgments Cause Knowledge Judgments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12007274588769724,"score_gpt":0.313337800412243,"score_spread":0.1932650545245458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524483968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48623893,0.003539284,0.0008501333,0.028314,0.017802982,0.0005949676,0.00019133903,0.00014434599,0.46232402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98476887,0.00015442526,0.0001383864,0.0004344324,0.0057545872,0.0000043184727,0.0000014206087,0.000027432352,0.008716128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832726,0.00027782607,0.0006176656,0.00018427873,0.00033219936,0.00026076485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981354,0.00031720838,0.0005148573,0.0002838188,0.00058820966,0.00016053708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088748644,0.00020202501,0.00039496753,0.00015440375,0.00029570682,0.000050924336,0.00031734485,0.00008587436,0.0007739984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016588267,0.00012486996,0.00029364382,0.000046973386,0.00053360575,0.00060059753,0.000060589402,0.0003869639,0.0002624675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003962096,0.0014805306,0.0018123209,0.00019841956,0.00087594485,0.000055000393,0.01970852,0.0000010526315,0.0028954863,0.93970793,0.019791007,0.013077556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017951943,0.0004468639,0.0005553655,0.00028617028,0.00019898951,0.00004134941,0.00030330135,0.0000012544934,0.001791736,0.54103935,0.4532462,0.00029422314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006219573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034086388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49852994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012706459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012600565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8474739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528290432","doi":"","title":"Carbon-Based Brain, Consciousness and Cognition: Understanding Cognitive States in the Context of the Kk Thesis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal Of Applied Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Burman University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Cognition; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Consciousness; Need to know; Existentialism; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.14862527863792874,"score_gpt":0.3311644760961682,"score_spread":0.1825391974582395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528290432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9545859,0.0002557433,0.000035933794,0.014497049,0.00015880707,0.00044010504,0.000066366214,0.0000035591902,0.029956553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999031,0.00006202369,0.0000032475937,0.0006325917,0.00017811483,0.000010064877,7.883985e-7,0.000010900168,0.000071248054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982069,0.0005634378,0.0003328322,0.00010753509,0.0005301227,0.00025914144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99212337,0.006997287,0.00022746884,0.00011604159,0.00048109595,0.000054753873],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036548793,0.00009331134,0.00022855742,0.00021977544,0.0003367084,0.00008193708,0.00027997798,0.000061505605,0.000056187644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032093955,0.000042619737,0.00006916637,0.000106842555,0.003289514,0.00005911182,0.000032413853,0.0005594946,0.0000024724684],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011612904,0.00029099933,0.003119828,0.0002787805,0.0003450566,0.00015681844,0.4623439,0.0000023078787,0.0016767839,0.51963764,0.0014973717,0.009489197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037011374,0.00038162802,0.0008651974,0.0010490326,0.00007022931,0.000034382192,0.73429877,0.000006796805,0.00860748,0.24822386,0.0025735546,0.00018794433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006291646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012875973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27195486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005421305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030934444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557832967","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2016.2.6","title":"Responsibilism and the Analytic-Sociological Debate in Social Epistemology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Artificiality; Social epistemology; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Sociological theory; Philosophy of science; Code (set theory); Social science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.061726967857170995,"score_gpt":0.2803678219097562,"score_spread":0.21864085405258518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557832967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68149406,0.000386689,0.00001959534,0.085641414,0.001141435,0.00049803255,0.00014194874,0.00011888797,0.23055795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930414,0.000015511472,0.000013924028,0.0026337907,0.00168853,0.000047933132,0.000006426494,0.000019285737,0.002533212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770856,0.000813819,0.00050770654,0.00042804927,0.00016024616,0.0003816354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975586,0.0018132592,0.00018664968,0.00029907754,0.00007846395,0.000063935746],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012702409,0.00023345293,0.0005740249,0.0001255977,0.00052112737,0.000076452015,0.0002778282,0.0002041852,0.0001653256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014226142,0.00012225422,0.00018255349,0.000053823118,0.0053140647,0.00010913191,0.000037773963,0.00033439163,0.00009099848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040844706,0.000058239224,0.00027397907,0.00001886958,0.000058403657,0.000029291397,0.061103653,1.5518706e-8,0.000039488656,0.9355671,0.0005514629,0.0018910946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024807279,0.0005250571,0.0022722823,0.000043228683,0.00007424891,0.000015100245,0.0034262221,0.000009984529,0.0000040017885,0.96187633,0.02901219,0.00026060964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056789526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027222998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31154734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041982632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049794136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563658370","doi":"10.1017/epi.2016.20","title":"DISAGREEMENT, DRUGS, ETC.: FROM ACCURACY TO AKRASIA","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Epistemology; Subject (documents); Psychology; Subject matter; Reliability (semiconductor); Philosophy; Computer science; Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.06129047173476556,"score_gpt":0.28407845940926113,"score_spread":0.22278798767449556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563658370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39437217,0.0008332616,0.0013559854,0.045883752,0.0073669115,0.0008803617,0.0008726221,0.00048047327,0.54795444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9162788,0.00003938366,0.00015662696,0.0034204565,0.0024046444,0.00004444418,0.000027767232,0.000036772624,0.0775911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843794,0.00012968022,0.0003763939,0.00040062392,0.0002678756,0.00038749812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839735,0.00059691636,0.00014291762,0.0005645948,0.00012504632,0.00017318864],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003192116,0.00022244261,0.00030932887,0.000062928186,0.0002830319,0.000117912045,0.00036330085,0.00007499935,0.0038806628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002016215,0.00014809181,0.00018490334,0.000032492906,0.00035435057,0.00028547624,0.00011458573,0.0001382104,0.0040446823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047471403,0.00013370655,0.002135552,0.000045890592,0.0001902225,0.000009609949,0.045817293,2.8011044e-7,0.001820631,0.81601906,0.110599,0.023181306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044817792,0.00007588954,0.0016564735,0.00011273775,0.000043444088,2.4249786e-7,0.0017806551,0.0000010039603,0.00056567806,0.04755604,0.94746083,0.00029880585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010916169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018190907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83686185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000627639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004450566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563753395","doi":"10.1017/s0012217316000718","title":"Le problème de la justification des lois logiques de base","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.049984357660904366,"score_gpt":0.27704693049569956,"score_spread":0.2270625728347952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563753395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47891793,0.025603903,0.080174714,0.064572304,0.004455864,0.0010348642,0.0014340641,0.0005982281,0.34320813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9572988,0.00312626,0.0017939861,0.0007139034,0.0019061448,0.000057770194,0.000044017084,0.000039005874,0.035020106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982076,0.00079153024,0.0002431877,0.0002491217,0.00008512914,0.00042338145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984338,0.00088866387,0.00012674536,0.00025817225,0.00017277499,0.00011983538],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012981622,0.00017134254,0.00020856009,0.000055429722,0.00046621906,0.00013020786,0.00017271432,0.0003012477,0.00014186538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000537919,0.00014113479,0.00012433493,0.000028649276,0.0027374267,0.00025071861,0.000034932906,0.0002380784,0.00022555517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001657455,0.00022828543,0.0008780849,0.000197821,0.000043518354,0.000015831216,0.027632007,0.0000036499823,0.0022948883,0.94503313,0.0054997928,0.018156387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034723326,0.000101968566,0.0020039333,0.00019817764,0.00009734118,0.000013248453,0.0012722415,0.000025267605,0.005369038,0.46150276,0.52882177,0.0002470238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005610973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004927024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.523322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020365058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051363284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2570406893","doi":"","title":"Emma Lazarus: Spinster-Versifier Well Worth Knowing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Women in Judaism A Multidisciplinary e-Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.043033823681805895,"score_gpt":0.2687350463197094,"score_spread":0.22570122263790351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2570406893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9178151,0.0004308036,0.00013491709,0.0021475644,0.004953006,0.00021954738,0.000025288675,0.00007045597,0.074203305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9460909,0.00036425202,0.0003362194,0.00019525876,0.0031497849,0.000027639657,0.0000041255257,0.00006353966,0.04976828],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684244,0.00030903568,0.00084228534,0.00042425867,0.0004295856,0.0011523789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827194,0.00030269934,0.00039340355,0.00040302024,0.00021076023,0.00041817976],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019547523,0.00037488915,0.0005598882,0.00042342747,0.0010765997,0.00030549598,0.0005807952,0.00017328438,0.0031271838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100679055,0.000257347,0.00027642536,0.00009597363,0.0007436987,0.0011246488,0.00027505608,0.0009794304,0.00070451136],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011517998,0.001960144,0.053791486,0.00033993192,0.00069893966,0.0032341166,0.80638224,0.0000800055,0.0023230866,0.056070175,0.019496845,0.054471254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0099084675,0.0015110688,0.018553529,0.0017293983,0.00011624059,0.0007999489,0.12537473,0.00010048181,0.0002751293,0.091620944,0.74803334,0.0019767142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025016725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018011211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7285365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045575007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020446665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573666881","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i4.4347","title":"Clarifying our Ideas in Persuasion Dialogue","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Epistemology; Accidental; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10135079636543842,"score_gpt":0.2871500701404811,"score_spread":0.18579927377504268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2573666881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47658753,0.00030623053,0.00026072108,0.003975228,0.0025465626,0.00026284892,0.000036030284,0.0001732324,0.5158516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99253964,0.00005017217,0.000056025954,0.0014238438,0.0005466575,0.00001053276,0.000007847199,0.000007986268,0.0053572613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916923,0.00004085638,0.00026052987,0.00011727969,0.000121473364,0.0002906212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995807,0.00007765712,0.000082408435,0.00014763222,0.000063992,0.00004760276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037154823,0.00011651635,0.00016926223,0.000091719456,0.00015328598,0.00005041151,0.0001472956,0.00011841229,0.00016047459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010742289,0.00007032467,0.00007871838,0.000023187546,0.000144468,0.00049030426,0.000058686637,0.00022825271,0.0005144862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031070227,0.000031392912,0.0024894322,0.000032297827,0.0000105647305,0.000012324442,0.016611235,0.000003248518,0.00012634526,0.9702599,0.00076501863,0.009627138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002354493,0.0005294584,0.011179732,0.0002432834,0.00003707196,0.00001735913,0.020415246,0.000049913106,0.00034832046,0.17497975,0.78905505,0.00079032115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022749888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001319846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7952802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027517342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003739993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6612851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580904948","doi":"10.7202/1073415ar","title":"One More Span in the Bridge: A Rejoinder to Michael Apple, Ulf Lundgren, and John White","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Bridge (graph theory); Span (engineering); Life span; Art; Sociology; Gerontology; Engineering; Medicine; Genetics; Biology","score_opus":0.10731138039702964,"score_gpt":0.2742381731235564,"score_spread":0.16692679272652677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580904948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.736004,0.0012733341,0.000626544,0.20246352,0.00048360522,0.001058666,0.00018414481,0.00014667293,0.057759497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654971,0.00006468396,0.00022178676,0.031732503,0.000886436,0.000042200478,0.000019394478,0.000023882414,0.0015120207],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890214,0.00013220387,0.00023138792,0.0002877015,0.00019185813,0.000254721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993755,0.00015325072,0.000061797036,0.00023889438,0.00006916759,0.000101357866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041061678,0.0001483262,0.00026302016,0.000058081314,0.00019126646,0.00012630194,0.00020901914,0.00006144107,0.00016098325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012675152,0.000118169926,0.000066824134,0.00008619843,0.00025619782,0.00009986791,0.00008640887,0.00029945333,0.00009571298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007239626,0.00015563381,0.010015248,0.00030114295,0.00011228775,0.000025596926,0.8229136,0.000015971036,0.00020000395,0.10057908,0.05980192,0.005807105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088591763,0.00027345013,0.065408476,0.00010394011,0.00016287086,0.000006600286,0.04315573,0.00025990338,0.00008867834,0.008160309,0.8808725,0.00062165846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008431564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004559168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82107055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011101024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025928812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48188296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586999247","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1286886","title":"Critical Notice of <i>Beyond the Analytic-Continental Divide: Pluralist Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century</i>. Edited by Jeffrey A. Bell, Andrew Cutrofello, and Paul M. Livingston (New York: Routledge, 2016. 334 + viii pp)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Analytic philosophy; Notice; Political philosophy; Continental philosophy; Ontology; Personhood; Meaning (existential); Politics; Agency (philosophy); Contemporary philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.040745096591124866,"score_gpt":0.25842399026233626,"score_spread":0.2176788936712114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586999247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18415901,0.047893584,0.000039463946,0.56590796,0.01343535,0.0012729823,0.0017380466,0.000030496478,0.1855231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899842,0.000578827,0.00001946141,0.0031917307,0.0056390315,0.0000032672926,0.000020332085,0.00003745427,0.000525707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762774,0.0002568455,0.0008242845,0.00029197126,0.0004357544,0.00056338654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969233,0.00072402577,0.0007642423,0.00062487734,0.00040444397,0.0005591089],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011160835,0.00035151982,0.0006526615,0.00021094334,0.0014925357,0.0006029077,0.0012131215,0.00017202766,0.00018810316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006997149,0.00023410804,0.00030319608,0.000077528224,0.0027551888,0.0006600597,0.00007372646,0.0010734656,0.000012847862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016739022,0.00033947363,0.010566019,0.00041095066,0.0004918796,0.00032511962,0.051824912,0.0000061045034,0.000108854394,0.48241833,0.45247936,0.0008615889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002553771,0.0006899167,0.0033275844,0.0009850787,0.0007486256,0.00015387461,0.003636928,0.000038501807,0.00008641529,0.16005845,0.8269932,0.00072764663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009881974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051047374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8058252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077126904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041280375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588495035","doi":"10.1163/18756735-000013","title":"Re-Thinking Gareth Evans’ Approach to Indexical Sense and the Problem of Tracking Thoughts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Grazer Philosophische Studien","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Indexicality; Cognition; Dynamics (music); Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13208561421437512,"score_gpt":0.30685258832020335,"score_spread":0.17476697410582823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588495035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105598904,0.0012587515,0.00026165528,0.027114084,0.00073157204,0.0014518971,0.000043262,0.0000992222,0.86344063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952702,0.000058162044,0.0010201348,0.0008348061,0.0019019446,0.00005353716,0.0000035195767,0.00002971193,0.0008279843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982689,0.0002144275,0.0003968179,0.00041797123,0.00037488705,0.00032702097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983982,0.00026057323,0.0003292155,0.0006653415,0.0002611669,0.000085529624],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016225604,0.00025340228,0.00056523806,0.000065567045,0.0020679997,0.00022882604,0.00037723128,0.000103177415,0.0000064149963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018063212,0.00015621401,0.00016241796,0.000029167639,0.002368845,0.00022703348,0.00039338227,0.0005145535,0.000009049532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010039476,0.000100249505,0.00032898944,0.00012301047,0.00020702889,0.0000054645993,0.15295163,0.0000037627033,0.000016868276,0.84498805,0.00047172332,0.00070286234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002442374,0.00020431347,0.0017079323,0.00020368733,0.00036686752,0.000012509502,0.01034349,0.00005405309,0.00016152157,0.9329488,0.051039822,0.0005146015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013896298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003430633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88967127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014622663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027034586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588631651","doi":"10.3721/037.002.sp1002","title":"Dedication and General Acknowledgments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the North Atlantic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.05799260578682626,"score_gpt":0.27870683353761344,"score_spread":0.2207142277507872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588631651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916143,0.00018208926,0.000013964773,0.0016059323,0.0018584719,0.00003694122,0.0000014048775,0.0000023550137,0.0046845623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945315,0.000121355675,0.000043117947,0.00020115763,0.0015589838,3.3932943e-7,4.9388666e-7,0.0000046649952,0.0035383622],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954623,0.00003852345,0.000167992,0.000044823137,0.000122009296,0.00008044871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999156,0.000026133257,0.00045005104,0.00018752858,0.00014157924,0.000038700793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021936164,0.000052608764,0.00011645492,0.000021408236,0.0005639851,0.00012901393,0.0002808996,0.000021329386,0.00003063615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000119095785,0.000030000945,0.00007068271,0.0000042421975,0.0002908254,0.00016144347,0.000050989984,0.00017492537,0.000010979586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032218242,0.00008629509,0.9420804,0.000085489686,0.00018424043,0.000011745199,0.010512906,0.000004006144,0.00011025512,0.0312948,0.01133743,0.0042602313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000797732,0.000114068775,0.78789157,0.00013385132,0.00024630892,0.00006552304,0.00025423037,0.00008646228,0.000080442354,0.015159942,0.1950266,0.00014325876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007150251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014173478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18368918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008563851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003294714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43377745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589461463","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-43355-4_1","title":"The Philosophy of Trust","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Peace psychology book series","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Express trust; Law and economics; Business; Social trust; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Law; Social capital","score_opus":0.06775460382103411,"score_gpt":0.28674898000245735,"score_spread":0.21899437618142326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589461463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013903812,0.016567696,0.00000615833,0.013874613,0.0032620418,0.00023230581,0.00017023727,0.000076953074,0.9657961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00052318705,0.0135416975,0.00001930887,0.0021325166,0.002393837,0.000024061586,0.00001713214,0.00008413699,0.9812641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842834,0.00007158775,0.0005531039,0.0004229791,0.00019976808,0.00032419772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794257,0.00029365477,0.0005623197,0.0008756664,0.00026585616,0.000059935734],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034137204,0.00040470276,0.00061313953,0.00009202764,0.00051129266,0.000040201525,0.0005208251,0.00041245634,0.0024419136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031524876,0.00025520974,0.0003306151,0.000005027453,0.0067408406,0.00021299951,0.00008310766,0.0006022656,0.0006015083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011760483,0.00001536193,0.0000031826125,0.00006368733,0.00023474683,0.0000068298127,0.004461456,1.1531263e-8,0.000013752339,0.9451379,0.04828271,0.0016627191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015146422,0.0001488438,0.000003930871,0.000078022655,0.000060850252,0.000008992287,0.000112570284,1.29817534e-8,0.000010014083,0.38154176,0.61770236,0.00018115087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000051617835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022760274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5694197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018535045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006309568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597563908","doi":"10.1080/13668790802048357","title":"Exchange","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics Place & Environment","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Obituary; Human rights; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.1447613686544509,"score_gpt":0.26664011353972117,"score_spread":0.12187874488527026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597563908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42232335,0.0051073316,0.0009086289,0.032019515,0.0042341165,0.00090974866,0.00014181514,0.00040836516,0.5339471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80960304,0.0041656126,0.0005453802,0.0062102266,0.0017132156,0.00006384706,0.000049723527,0.00006335284,0.17758562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854016,0.00020121367,0.00022272284,0.00030363514,0.00042331452,0.0003089535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900424,0.00039575735,0.00009563474,0.00038220247,0.000023188337,0.000098963086],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078075274,0.000187623,0.00021000956,0.000042544405,0.000747167,0.000027712464,0.00018450229,0.00020829916,0.0030964494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006544684,0.00017525618,0.000106116335,0.000011798527,0.0012965024,0.000116942705,0.00008893454,0.0010813426,0.0016892488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032513093,0.00033043916,0.0003226436,0.00012380487,0.00009037376,0.00007891552,0.43027315,0.0001025288,0.0002287216,0.5377013,0.03001286,0.00070275844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025828497,0.00009316742,0.00024760462,0.000013077555,0.000023297996,0.000009439377,0.002096531,0.000019480905,0.00021927609,0.004678099,0.9921108,0.00023096651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014954721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025044396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96209794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007270759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054800672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600040101","doi":"10.3998/ergo.12405314.0004.005","title":"Objectivism and Perspectivism about the Epistemic Ought","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; Queen's University; University of Birmingham; Queen's University Belfast; University of Southampton","keywords":"Perspectivism; Objectivism; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.22984154815331467,"score_gpt":0.4166930429679461,"score_spread":0.18685149481463145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600040101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4691142,0.00305003,0.000063195286,0.047678333,0.0039405567,0.00051924516,0.00003090883,0.000024118212,0.4755794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99142826,0.0003742809,0.00006235361,0.0009783285,0.004492787,0.0000064004394,0.0000011352295,0.000031310312,0.0026251655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985777,0.00022799204,0.0004331871,0.00023849138,0.00029600598,0.00022663319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974254,0.00016123461,0.0011451188,0.0006785388,0.00044795906,0.00014179689],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012918747,0.00021064507,0.00046099254,0.00009507833,0.0021634777,0.0053411103,0.0035256557,0.00007082202,0.00019679536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019765175,0.00013243982,0.00013399996,0.000020087868,0.0013035254,0.005288451,0.00074454746,0.00069254916,0.000012101017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001185841,0.00015476129,0.0010783756,0.000043195487,0.00019261903,0.00004719378,0.02291165,0.0000022985541,0.000076835044,0.9709569,0.0018852948,0.0025322495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009324894,0.0003819639,0.009095557,0.00018236833,0.000115896015,0.00010665318,0.0016557327,0.000012359273,0.000110766625,0.95107204,0.03607043,0.00026375253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051017385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056766265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.522314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036250713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013618135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605974930","doi":"10.22329/cjpp.v1i1.8157","title":"Why Practical Ethics Should be Interested in Cognitive Science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Practical Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Cognition; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.51443259865772,"score_gpt":0.4433573921493324,"score_spread":0.07107520650838756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605974930","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059022304,0.00015041785,0.00023763606,0.78620267,0.0046611642,0.00032295572,0.00009962095,0.000045920908,0.14925729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754443,0.000030295181,0.00021940086,0.022719754,0.0013476841,0.0000032611372,0.0000056668778,0.000025824378,0.00020378674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751335,0.00041254505,0.0005951345,0.00026308585,0.0006172325,0.00059866323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994074,0.003264443,0.00033188795,0.00018062585,0.0012702665,0.00087879074],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003766603,0.00018401943,0.000361392,0.000965043,0.0005410816,0.00033873285,0.00029974055,0.00021016398,0.0005079428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019547913,0.0001651212,0.00013650772,0.0004437073,0.0037493962,0.0014052185,0.000047222962,0.0033822714,0.00010727554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008086886,0.000082303355,0.00030614552,0.000040920087,0.000058927428,0.002096845,0.02308931,0.0000030064057,0.000038523634,0.95887256,0.015142119,0.00018850394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011321576,0.0007946961,0.00074463064,0.000528669,0.0001813546,0.00048883,0.01576857,0.00011628087,0.00014196243,0.59495467,0.38463637,0.00051179534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026749773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058799688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.916422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018861631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005435963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607495368","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199688234.003.0009","title":"Epistemic Situationism and Cognitive Ability","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Situationism; Virtue; Epistemic virtue; Epistemology; Experimental philosophy; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Social epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Western philosophy","score_opus":0.07211824943830239,"score_gpt":0.239394380772415,"score_spread":0.16727613133411262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607495368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043868847,0.00017117748,0.000048048314,0.00007903475,0.00042909908,0.00038641164,0.0004593679,0.00007900057,0.9979092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027560798,0.00022651374,0.00001910111,0.00007964137,0.00034453033,9.959872e-7,0.00007176354,0.000030628133,0.97166604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894625,0.000052482344,0.0001709892,0.00045103845,0.00017588791,0.0002033525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855506,0.00021462677,0.0003740612,0.00042945636,0.00032121106,0.00010555484],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018443109,0.00030927174,0.00043905395,0.00007731393,0.0010888536,0.00016145478,0.0002902055,0.0003389876,0.00009719811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026330457,0.00034242263,0.00017713483,5.0954446e-7,0.002341695,0.00016129947,0.00024073348,0.0005750636,0.000003856515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053704112,0.000009122827,0.000004661049,0.00015824822,0.00019772467,0.000032127133,0.0071531455,5.0647927e-8,0.0000020682928,0.98614115,0.00031968567,0.0059283394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004460237,0.00006106352,0.000016814736,0.00020271217,0.00046141123,0.0000034939371,0.0005229926,0.00000385393,0.000010065543,0.05667551,0.9412469,0.0003491078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026486942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008638436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94092727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005494752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009825904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26102380","doi":"10.2214/ajr.14.12960","title":"Insensitive Enough Semantics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Principia an international journal of epistemology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Sentence; Linguistics; Semantics (computer science); Truth condition; Point (geometry); Computer science; Slogan; Relevance (law); Ellipsis (linguistics); Philosophy; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.04601516086217675,"score_gpt":0.2965572149190003,"score_spread":0.2505420540568235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26102380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91080403,0.00015254207,0.000827712,0.0040000966,0.0075425315,0.000088122055,0.000033872457,0.000032168984,0.07651891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98882604,0.00003993664,0.00091223494,0.0008762072,0.005371411,0.00000165496,0.000020752239,0.00002263532,0.0039291503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815834,0.00024923752,0.0007741604,0.0001798924,0.00040393806,0.0002344326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970635,0.00025349055,0.00074600993,0.00017499387,0.0016823255,0.00007965843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006775988,0.0001714364,0.00036949088,0.0002503078,0.0001351062,0.00011158334,0.0005275618,0.000109503,0.00028398522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014167353,0.00015060286,0.00020494241,0.000025427225,0.00058761763,0.00045696014,0.00007125541,0.00040856205,0.000058202022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012192212,0.00030064816,0.0032604113,0.000014239179,0.0002088949,0.00042614382,0.005051903,0.00007720705,0.00049146276,0.9887984,0.0006917216,0.0005570857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021080081,0.0010963124,0.020640638,0.00012474174,0.0001909848,0.002718173,0.0023501178,0.00024290549,0.00188677,0.15472287,0.8133381,0.0005804002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036742826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073955196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8340755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010081471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014354617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6141406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613095313","doi":"10.1163/17455197-01403002","title":"Has Jonathan Bernier Rescued Critical Realism?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster Divinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Realism; Confusion; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.1852723032266653,"score_gpt":0.32305277171882785,"score_spread":0.13778046849216255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613095313","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32034117,0.008087578,0.0020453103,0.4424141,0.14963959,0.0042259768,0.00029343652,0.00021849234,0.07273433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94346464,0.000041452022,0.000035575507,0.00028007457,0.0029910186,0.000021213502,1.3254919e-7,0.000024966694,0.053140905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830824,0.00028896713,0.00049142196,0.00016211726,0.0004631632,0.00028610814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967046,0.0020963394,0.00024951095,0.00043206528,0.0004271653,0.00009034398],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011539843,0.00015106899,0.0003303338,0.00004599096,0.002003311,0.000068589936,0.00068576983,0.000063672036,0.0000994832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014660951,0.00005988912,0.00040343753,0.000035882993,0.0007199927,0.000098729855,0.000099969664,0.0004183779,0.000009406101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082248327,0.0022694971,0.0003144007,0.000071208655,0.00072059536,0.000018668648,0.11368706,0.0000048746815,0.00060999766,0.44096956,0.43132305,0.009188581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011266116,0.0008244985,0.00030147453,0.000042199277,0.00033446806,0.000020742134,0.0046107937,0.000003698449,0.00003433651,0.067490235,0.9250779,0.0001330174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042758734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008276413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62312347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030900474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006480957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616329343","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v5i5.3206","title":"Ryle on the Explanatory Role of Knowledge How","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Åbo Akademi; Universitetet i Oslo; Université de Montréal","keywords":"Intellectualism; Epistemology; Possession (linguistics); Framing (construction); Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.18700933372943965,"score_gpt":0.30468931881527667,"score_spread":0.11767998508583702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616329343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013306586,0.009008215,0.000056896817,0.04817478,0.010770414,0.00040285502,0.000073376475,0.00001918081,0.9181877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655019,0.00006292097,0.000009888239,0.0003882981,0.0022345204,0.0000050610392,6.2635837e-7,0.000017068005,0.031779703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911845,0.00008855229,0.00028443252,0.00011316235,0.0002353232,0.00016007994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770725,0.0007880811,0.0005541436,0.0005489896,0.0003324217,0.00006911367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094233244,0.00012953785,0.00032051292,0.000070857706,0.0009786519,0.000045256398,0.00074381335,0.00006172398,0.00017864144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039766534,0.00006872226,0.00048157657,0.0000080381915,0.0023687985,0.00013474566,0.000043931588,0.00045988854,0.000015270121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009302829,0.00013443247,0.000013320337,0.000042846303,0.00019262951,0.0000010495959,0.005970489,0.0000019801066,0.00004658049,0.9124932,0.08060264,0.00040777697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002559034,0.00023521564,0.000054759825,0.000048060418,0.00016079661,0.0000022410663,0.0007510958,0.00020923809,0.00004046217,0.32501063,0.6731575,0.000074056086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014320781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034246073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95219535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011026263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012731859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8727937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617962162","doi":"","title":"Rationality and Salience","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aporia","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Salience (neuroscience); Salient; Irrational number; Epistemology; Ecological rationality; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2073546961187617,"score_gpt":0.29979701784454765,"score_spread":0.09244232172578595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617962162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49377906,0.00049905846,0.0001299741,0.0032370428,0.0031666576,0.00011526548,0.00001859048,0.000078733145,0.4989756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901808,0.00000684226,0.00012309742,0.0006329518,0.0007322197,0.0000035142098,0.000008058612,0.0000034763946,0.008309072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999656,0.000031052765,0.00007617444,0.000086383756,0.00008253033,0.000067839144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996964,0.000049414608,0.000029741434,0.00008207437,0.000094625604,0.000047759473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028877097,0.00004114798,0.00006577981,0.000009458226,0.000084943415,0.00004141547,0.00004122202,0.00002088187,0.000082421066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006706854,0.000034323966,0.00001320958,0.000007381975,0.00026799735,0.000110448025,0.000016812794,0.000058198006,0.00006167495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028307252,0.000009944846,0.0005283036,0.000005005815,0.0000046019577,7.282806e-7,0.014429257,2.2453911e-7,0.000012542642,0.9766395,0.008089377,0.00027767412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016282454,0.00003152355,0.00073687267,0.0000032127325,0.00000859564,0.0000014733231,0.0021203374,0.00001442456,0.00004893799,0.28100443,0.7157963,0.00007106838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024641072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041271438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7077069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006765871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036605583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13996908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2725111037","doi":"10.1007/s11406-017-9867-3","title":"Epistemic Uniqueness and the Practical Relevance of Epistemic Practices","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy of language; Relevance (law); Philosophy; Epistemic virtue; Metaphysics; Philosophy of mind; Sociology; Political science; Virtue","score_opus":0.19290650555385228,"score_gpt":0.37254892096295555,"score_spread":0.17964241540910328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2725111037","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19210307,0.00321622,0.000058232923,0.48290786,0.0019337093,0.00073666655,0.000050509763,0.00008741316,0.3189063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958934,0.0006932738,0.00017049849,0.0005828689,0.0011080299,0.00002739183,0.0000028226036,0.000021530503,0.0015001572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863756,0.00031041075,0.00036623678,0.00027154307,0.00021604278,0.00019819596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99562836,0.0016995844,0.0015167635,0.00085018954,0.000248041,0.00005707834],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013131557,0.00016948192,0.0003976052,0.000032792428,0.00095738226,0.00021114324,0.0004031114,0.00008918974,0.00004220441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002903349,0.00011237288,0.00009914969,0.000011872004,0.004443495,0.0006061043,0.0001472677,0.00043646593,0.000027163052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001765986,0.00004701936,0.00033919798,0.0001941928,0.00006834218,0.00000754428,0.0052008117,2.7636779e-7,0.0001260803,0.99337167,0.00019362796,0.00027465547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009159746,0.00006424164,0.00040519366,0.00011442805,0.00014981741,0.00003723125,0.00077559263,0.00004929687,0.0002356616,0.96642697,0.030656526,0.00016904835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006106925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003805605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8037904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014345717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008501104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99826586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727273490","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12425","title":"Experimental work on the norms of assertion","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation; Rolex","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Cognition; Principal (computer security); Work (physics); Cognitive science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1933476619438803,"score_gpt":0.31189174323549074,"score_spread":0.11854408129161043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727273490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45432562,0.00009481005,0.000007974535,0.011464324,0.001321511,0.00015161633,0.00001094156,0.000030286652,0.5325929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975601,0.0000030387075,0.0000109395605,0.00055133,0.0011568456,0.000017182536,0.0000041550525,0.000011336964,0.0006850675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999365,0.00005274846,0.00016120294,0.00013042541,0.00016923728,0.00012142836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999031,0.00011297379,0.00021048405,0.0005473385,0.00006997773,0.00002822603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018390012,0.0001076498,0.00017383054,0.000023753988,0.0007609186,0.00010602956,0.00038266927,0.00003431153,0.00018276295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031048356,0.000068371584,0.00011229775,0.000007870041,0.0006714314,0.00012283909,0.00005592399,0.0001795654,0.000113969734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036340174,0.00014906087,0.00022550837,0.000011482036,0.00003419323,9.0055295e-7,0.0061002285,0.0000013697618,0.00028763464,0.99154246,0.0014765665,0.00013426115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011049954,0.00064376515,0.010637989,0.0002893216,0.000072705545,0.0000013233108,0.0030078478,0.000066563414,0.042968616,0.82859606,0.11204058,0.000570255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007835034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002499853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54323447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013696755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000103420025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5852448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734800671","doi":"10.7202/1040326ar","title":"Rationalité et affectivité des intuitions","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.5502084713390207,"score_gpt":0.4378429910160865,"score_spread":0.11236548032293425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734800671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038246267,0.022035575,0.00037756845,0.24976273,0.0033429125,0.00040035768,0.00060383906,0.0001789645,0.6850518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612033,0.0034801543,0.00045125146,0.0046770643,0.011492391,0.000065098735,0.00006235491,0.000049187038,0.018519243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844307,0.0003950524,0.00028911608,0.00034024235,0.00019597175,0.00033653298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809676,0.00040751608,0.00029747415,0.0006890901,0.0003886674,0.000120462006],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007441174,0.0002772798,0.00034434322,0.000071567,0.0031012432,0.00077199034,0.00036979516,0.00019881738,0.00062957115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046599755,0.00028320766,0.0002449241,0.000010823619,0.0044439207,0.0012571455,0.00014475094,0.0005240355,0.00032251287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012916619,0.00028323737,0.0004503132,0.00025739148,0.00013795686,0.000015939098,0.0079181325,0.0000021752687,0.000060567807,0.98173153,0.007086742,0.0020431164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018069097,0.0001298263,0.0022257958,0.00023927115,0.00008681844,0.0000074787354,0.00016763603,0.000014154826,0.00024204023,0.7096964,0.28677633,0.00023353002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020691846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027462975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.922957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007998477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000119357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734814182","doi":"10.7202/1040328ar","title":"Intuition et lois logiques","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Intuition; Epistemology; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.5044543442902811,"score_gpt":0.428652675167189,"score_spread":0.07580166912309211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734814182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012219854,0.02121669,0.00027611802,0.30346698,0.0054002246,0.0003259587,0.0003117296,0.00024148796,0.656541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93629134,0.0135845775,0.00042887838,0.011470112,0.017803466,0.000037559013,0.00006522327,0.00006788202,0.020250976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809647,0.0004043812,0.00041324281,0.00043711162,0.00022591246,0.00042287953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780357,0.00022181062,0.00049194414,0.00094255025,0.00040389405,0.00013620315],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009533005,0.00035538015,0.00046591982,0.00008590449,0.0016487993,0.0008994941,0.0005685152,0.00036530857,0.0006763028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037059537,0.0003552844,0.00027162905,0.000008442219,0.0029749384,0.0012555138,0.00021620683,0.0007975814,0.0005476542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024538322,0.00021286798,0.00020602309,0.00029975857,0.000112607995,0.000035209767,0.013559261,6.5845296e-7,0.000037920214,0.9658067,0.016271295,0.0034331346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014781395,0.00019180722,0.0003231408,0.00024981573,0.00007371693,0.000004913424,0.00021541967,0.000012058236,0.00038046174,0.57026464,0.42788395,0.00025228734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037081328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001790304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9240715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013162395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010293672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735266767","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1341781","title":"Epistemic buck-passing and the interpersonal view of testimony","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Testimonial; Epistemology; Reductionism; Philosophy; Interpersonal communication; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.07887050824485706,"score_gpt":0.26424391813652787,"score_spread":0.1853734098916708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735266767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37140694,0.024431802,0.00008790256,0.18383148,0.006639337,0.00040775147,0.00018016483,0.000011904224,0.41300273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997432,0.000056995657,0.00006179639,0.0007709831,0.0012771442,7.969378e-7,5.590217e-7,0.0000109948405,0.00038873678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924564,0.00008397884,0.00033043808,0.00007758366,0.00010772981,0.00015462273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985773,0.00016307754,0.0005628728,0.00022374412,0.00026910738,0.00020388771],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062197214,0.000102724705,0.00032645208,0.00009343332,0.00074331654,0.00020153912,0.00038304448,0.000044552202,0.00010241541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029070547,0.00006776371,0.00014637175,0.0000093203735,0.003139807,0.00022160154,0.00001847388,0.0003384078,0.000004212984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029685729,0.000008307959,0.001130307,0.00010456298,0.00011612326,0.000045313674,0.018159524,7.5989703e-7,0.00002539916,0.9747281,0.00089894497,0.004752942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015273743,0.00020001897,0.0014839395,0.00095533655,0.00019901586,0.00018680118,0.001439699,0.00003855912,0.00004869425,0.9063108,0.08740224,0.00020751297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004488973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018554205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6260251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029897943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038243542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736235872","doi":"10.7202/1040329ar","title":"De l’impossibilité du savoir intuitif conçu comme état purement mental et d’une difficulté que cela soulève pour l’évidentialisme1","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.34992668815973754,"score_gpt":0.3865103299351215,"score_spread":0.03658364177538398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736235872","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26465526,0.011971057,0.00012367342,0.61247134,0.0065759337,0.0011481789,0.0011540944,0.00027658828,0.10162385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95839024,0.006396608,0.00022229199,0.014491869,0.012310418,0.00010099883,0.00017147293,0.00012329727,0.0077928132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958599,0.00088571245,0.0009525001,0.0008297416,0.00053099066,0.0009411388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639225,0.00049901084,0.0008767888,0.0013246234,0.00052699813,0.00038032173],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001659452,0.0007493932,0.000924927,0.00011778853,0.0029777107,0.0017107198,0.0010931274,0.0004965351,0.0007042798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004204469,0.00073287776,0.0006006524,0.00002332717,0.0037883287,0.001053845,0.00055338803,0.0012333001,0.00022249183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096955875,0.0010237638,0.0015370413,0.00047833397,0.0004745455,0.00012992845,0.056316964,0.000004414729,0.00097041496,0.8925527,0.04555709,0.00085785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013629629,0.00039112338,0.0015841313,0.00057728577,0.00036248853,0.000051396913,0.0036363679,0.00011585622,0.0019792903,0.6707528,0.31837472,0.00081156765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009660215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051031667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.693735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004976819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003378529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736825968","doi":"10.1093/analys/anx082","title":"Epistemic Evaluation: Purposeful Evaluation By David K. Henderson and John Greco","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology of Wikipedia; Social epistemology; Sociology; Epistemic virtue; Philosophy; Virtue; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13646189563495761,"score_gpt":0.3459592797178043,"score_spread":0.2094973840828467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736825968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7834794,0.0058595915,0.00034890426,0.010080025,0.0011779097,0.0007795079,0.00011571474,0.000080435144,0.1980785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99068254,0.00016961353,0.000034631197,0.00027068835,0.00038710973,0.00005127069,0.00021954921,0.000012507216,0.008172091],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982699,0.0003108508,0.00028371782,0.00037333308,0.0005669228,0.00019524299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982283,0.0001045659,0.0003694124,0.00066932244,0.00055698364,0.000071397306],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024308101,0.00015927442,0.0003552084,0.0001518953,0.0012103077,0.00045864156,0.00022868563,0.0000888321,0.0016251629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026530868,0.0001451777,0.00020810221,0.000051443123,0.00045601034,0.00041945564,0.00004743562,0.0001587249,0.000058925856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012614159,0.00066481344,0.10697133,0.00038221103,0.018787788,0.000013303335,0.1656421,0.00033062955,0.000998177,0.2060096,0.07086293,0.429211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005946492,0.0005212132,0.077932,0.00015378474,0.07631484,0.000011366417,0.02863092,0.1516702,0.00089614943,0.24610676,0.40910146,0.0027148356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014529242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076781344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42649615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066018074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065883454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740630192","doi":"10.7202/1073305ar","title":"On Taking Experts' Word for Things: Disagreeing with Battersby","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Word (group theory); Computer science; Linguistics; Psychology; Natural language processing; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10812300725362532,"score_gpt":0.2683463765193482,"score_spread":0.16022336926572284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740630192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69155127,0.0007066126,0.021920016,0.066679426,0.0026590738,0.0016362822,0.00011729749,0.0009630587,0.21376696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749079,0.00000693565,0.00073233683,0.021776116,0.0011556236,0.00005357032,0.000013598892,0.00003942276,0.0013145091],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910593,0.00004430009,0.00017039872,0.0002786209,0.00015201802,0.00024874244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991351,0.0004203292,0.00013360223,0.00016017136,0.000071686,0.00007914989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016191199,0.00016157413,0.00023145779,0.000032439984,0.00037222143,0.00012752233,0.00015151866,0.0000433731,0.00034713856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018825728,0.000121858655,0.00010918492,0.000027567728,0.00018240957,0.00021002509,0.000028515702,0.00014847347,0.00003795264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028959592,0.00010319715,0.0007221416,0.000378364,0.00024906697,0.000017531504,0.48247975,0.00005165128,0.00045970836,0.47065178,0.026128357,0.018468851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020432165,0.0014145658,0.00015499184,0.0005480153,0.00030207782,0.000003085614,0.066633165,0.0019106055,0.0016323148,0.022120375,0.9019957,0.0012418429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013938111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021897141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87586737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017432354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018726712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49692518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744991123","doi":"10.7202/1073425ar","title":"Open-mindedness Revisited: A Response to Cornel Hamm","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Crisis response; Political science; Public relations","score_opus":0.18079778987981013,"score_gpt":0.3147020651341823,"score_spread":0.13390427525437218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744991123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53162235,0.0009999438,0.001703438,0.15109429,0.0026748646,0.0023543423,0.00061423867,0.000653861,0.30828267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94010466,0.000020543624,0.00046127656,0.038176797,0.0008620135,0.00005925433,0.00002159601,0.000045079643,0.020248746],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985292,0.00031738795,0.00029376766,0.00039785684,0.00018138085,0.00028040697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874306,0.00035736038,0.00009332942,0.0003633704,0.00019307998,0.00024982076],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000896987,0.00017667546,0.00036200884,0.000059020964,0.0003244678,0.0003553837,0.00062339526,0.00006819572,0.0014220217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095658423,0.00016080658,0.00010890547,0.000100876256,0.00018298175,0.00022226463,0.00035514467,0.00023358563,0.001430673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028901042,0.00025769582,0.0009399008,0.0003522709,0.0002538713,0.00013929766,0.37176695,0.000019092246,0.0040991544,0.33379522,0.2709399,0.014546565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003755424,0.00024332618,0.00034085792,0.00004351734,0.0000519535,0.0000015869663,0.0055717486,0.00003619893,0.00033497225,0.002840632,0.9898879,0.00027178242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035302556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025460168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.718948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025380643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000891292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746667616","doi":"","title":"Scientifically Responsible Metaphysics: A Program for the Naturalization of Metaphysics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metaphysics; Naturalization; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.1585404972896758,"score_gpt":0.3164575112740445,"score_spread":0.15791701398436866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746667616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80649525,0.009761153,0.06662393,0.033657078,0.009868256,0.008515131,0.00076984876,0.00066022726,0.06364911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96884406,0.00029553205,0.003332328,0.0001276395,0.00060701557,0.000002733107,0.000043636643,0.000022751647,0.026724335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986813,0.00010113298,0.00027329623,0.00032127573,0.00031181995,0.0003111915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746025,0.00049831276,0.00079502515,0.0006881047,0.000469944,0.00008837875],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091496675,0.00018052447,0.00042119066,0.00009511895,0.0017391928,0.000118034375,0.0013208654,0.00024491156,0.000103797116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025858908,0.00015551904,0.00039730174,0.00010358076,0.002644492,0.0006010987,0.00020961501,0.0006409985,0.0000062664326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040497532,0.00014548798,0.00037513292,0.00017560819,0.0005267866,8.172352e-7,0.026927764,0.00008845634,0.0011090202,0.897431,0.032148905,0.04066603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019018404,0.00024317135,0.0016197916,0.00042988185,0.0012822981,8.881141e-7,0.014827826,0.0019895819,0.0033444746,0.11212513,0.86172634,0.0005087483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005871825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007077915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82957745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028472386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002462961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751008220","doi":"","title":"Judging the Superego: A Dialogue","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of psychoanalysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Id, ego and super-ego; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.1054580604502129,"score_gpt":0.27619806734935376,"score_spread":0.17074000689914087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751008220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43578404,0.014108977,0.0012762811,0.0766839,0.014981135,0.00028692925,0.00013951154,0.000036600683,0.45670262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991925,0.000023025474,0.000077694116,0.0017382574,0.0019734893,0.0000011155312,0.0000037296284,0.000014589145,0.0042430786],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885124,0.00017249794,0.00038405426,0.000102523656,0.0002141137,0.00027557014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820983,0.00009984028,0.00023328445,0.00026544862,0.0006080747,0.00058348814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011560065,0.00011638821,0.00029302473,0.00031861442,0.0003508431,0.00021742133,0.00041629697,0.000049344984,0.0005357098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021904102,0.00007601435,0.00031633684,0.00012415605,0.00049188157,0.00018961591,0.000005767913,0.00037867896,0.000063990745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037409824,0.000060485192,0.012341769,0.000027307271,0.002342098,0.00035938591,0.27115166,0.0005312341,0.000022153341,0.3361124,0.36848137,0.008532723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028290637,0.00007417765,0.00025217552,0.000025439625,0.00048595326,0.00007376081,0.020870995,0.00006549758,0.0000058550518,0.023170296,0.9545404,0.00015255106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020245308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4601032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58605903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008384886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008089749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98627895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755107964","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4936","title":"Wohlrapp's concept of justification","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Foundation (evidence); Principal (computer security); Section (typography); Focus (optics); Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.13700339787255736,"score_gpt":0.3094114464042696,"score_spread":0.17240804853171224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755107964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103041664,0.00013615625,0.000121061305,0.0006119239,0.0012383835,0.00012793651,0.000036717673,0.000043103424,0.89464307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904831,0.0000110529745,0.00008201519,0.0003123292,0.0003202459,0.000005118172,0.00001593294,0.0000036981328,0.0087665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995079,0.000011791046,0.00020266318,0.00006585915,0.000090157635,0.00012164627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991969,0.00003591556,0.0002774446,0.00032683078,0.00013734298,0.000025594303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015570881,0.00006745346,0.00013092,0.000025868787,0.00039691932,0.00008559105,0.00025514018,0.000054195163,0.0003463686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086533735,0.000053497268,0.00005998765,0.000004671961,0.0008785009,0.0003864555,0.00004163259,0.0001139822,0.000111447625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008209903,0.000017090902,0.00015685215,0.00003125617,0.000011827912,6.0454835e-7,0.01605745,0.0000061076103,0.00004441297,0.9763022,0.0009234232,0.006440582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007757642,0.00032558342,0.012674322,0.000050703904,0.00007162574,0.0000036363747,0.010036788,0.00017529746,0.0046921005,0.05142664,0.9193921,0.00037540344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017346416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012544091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92487556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000043377013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026199246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3792493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755214255","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4832","title":"Issues of Logicism and Objectivity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Objectivity (philosophy); Sociology","score_opus":0.10860358335288248,"score_gpt":0.31582165329602374,"score_spread":0.20721806994314126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755214255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4398731,0.00026599978,0.000015821348,0.00044789902,0.00046017717,0.00007377605,0.000015674916,0.00002756694,0.55882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927175,0.0000832722,0.000087084016,0.0002948476,0.00025307073,0.0000027749893,0.0000022767638,0.000003399349,0.0065557403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995369,0.000015680913,0.00015175405,0.00007764095,0.000082245715,0.00013579543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993991,0.000049668848,0.00018486755,0.00025071413,0.00008680293,0.000028809414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002566775,0.00008249155,0.00018597409,0.000026406593,0.00044541748,0.00010741205,0.00016506191,0.000059292885,0.00012787837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011524201,0.00006059879,0.00004802084,0.000003499031,0.0010036774,0.000441875,0.00010035533,0.00012909262,0.000030281417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013384497,0.00002330888,0.003133721,0.00006312404,0.000018008903,0.0000025685583,0.013631414,9.239323e-7,0.00003740495,0.9781772,0.00025183527,0.004647141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000976448,0.00087651977,0.12681578,0.00007311489,0.00007479386,0.000016047037,0.0067685843,0.000097837605,0.0021253538,0.3493587,0.51226443,0.0005523658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064519263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057318725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62881845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000028546506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000143292145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3698091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W27621635","doi":"10.2147/ndt.s109328","title":"Argumentation and the epistemology of disagreement","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Social epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02405682799969686,"score_gpt":0.23355752707945726,"score_spread":0.2095006990797604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W27621635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98210675,0.0028648453,0.000006521511,0.0054286458,0.00045297755,0.0006595245,0.000027139606,0.000017573235,0.008436036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995876,0.0009410987,0.000022059492,0.00050711667,0.0001798132,0.00010547689,0.000011692942,0.000008251523,0.0023485012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992993,0.00013037064,0.00019106753,0.00017810405,0.000085449254,0.000115716415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946755,0.0001417807,0.00010039898,0.00016446777,0.00004071682,0.00008511107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000058594498,0.000121672405,0.00017620681,0.00003787399,0.00019113452,0.00004853057,0.000043428536,0.000014620701,0.00012916917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008523985,0.00006751891,0.00006817559,0.000020414705,0.00058799586,0.000073212665,0.000021584166,0.000038348262,0.00001836156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024880475,0.0005802474,0.016821066,0.00010948311,0.00027721355,0.0000060475113,0.012307785,0.0000019107388,0.000010698842,0.9404435,0.000856379,0.028336847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026015623,0.0036183374,0.51584446,0.00007350134,0.004760059,0.000021881464,0.012820562,0.0006348774,0.000056512075,0.3545743,0.080603756,0.000976117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061539357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001244007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58586925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000079079255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001960194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27533412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763699835","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v12i1.207","title":"Ends to Means","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Action (physics); Mathematical economics; Epistemology; Probability theory; Mathematics; Philosophy; Statistics; Physics","score_opus":0.2549660712055516,"score_gpt":0.3692213849265189,"score_spread":0.11425531372096731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763699835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103801824,0.00046292023,0.00014551924,0.38467047,0.005396075,0.00013961284,0.000054739736,0.000020149073,0.5053087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986416,0.00010216479,0.00013325315,0.004651668,0.0077422787,7.662155e-7,6.577294e-7,0.00001358443,0.00093962805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990301,0.00012285617,0.00029874174,0.000096719305,0.00030401855,0.00014753768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985353,0.00021880057,0.0004386051,0.00014048992,0.0005689348,0.000097922464],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015974256,0.00010752407,0.00030226546,0.00006941635,0.0023886363,0.00032658322,0.00029184282,0.00017130819,0.0000446163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041617974,0.00008873303,0.00017137156,0.000007861112,0.0007689529,0.00024713099,0.00006992931,0.001313894,0.000009628924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023598941,0.00003275566,0.000054368895,0.000040487463,0.0000629581,0.000011294704,0.10442432,2.897132e-7,0.000038804705,0.89314634,0.0011050234,0.0010597785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029864942,0.00019964157,0.00045246727,0.00004504843,0.000055765748,0.0000046990504,0.0018798674,0.0000011237667,0.000018770941,0.75042313,0.24649975,0.000121073834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005326967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001941648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8826142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001471174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097915654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765822788","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12467","title":"Frauds, Posers And Sheep: A Virtue Theoretic Solution To The Acquaintance Debate","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Competence (human resources); Pessimism; Philosophy; Epistemic virtue; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.28017045503461835,"score_gpt":0.3819201367417756,"score_spread":0.10174968170715726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765822788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13993205,0.0025390743,0.00011750415,0.117245525,0.00037359566,0.00067999435,0.000046850382,0.000054096534,0.7390113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597806,0.0005992298,0.000051911826,0.0012128303,0.00096078997,0.000064139764,0.0000031618472,0.000011909113,0.0011179744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827516,0.00037612926,0.00017148706,0.0004043837,0.00030951653,0.00046332192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844235,0.00061179016,0.000063355736,0.0005272086,0.00018302417,0.0001722975],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018894231,0.00015213084,0.00021928754,0.0000683909,0.0034953973,0.00051418843,0.0005535961,0.00010382743,0.0001556925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066504173,0.000091155925,0.000043654818,0.000032923686,0.004280048,0.00017083851,0.00047812145,0.00071052235,0.00010713349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010526089,0.00004537792,0.00010229806,0.00003513034,0.000025803001,0.000007635531,0.009464363,5.974606e-7,0.00003382244,0.98533934,0.00020920242,0.004631147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021092236,0.00050268165,0.0005751407,0.000030387067,0.0000103553475,0.00000299024,0.0013042112,0.000056411765,0.000008223134,0.96180606,0.035358146,0.00013445629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014884908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018603161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.856046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024120429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025035557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767561991","doi":"10.4000/books.pum.3421","title":"4. Le savoir selon Guillaume d’Ockham","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.02417717989502342,"score_gpt":0.18883550735466326,"score_spread":0.16465832745963985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767561991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002229678,0.010742327,0.00025980812,0.0031564583,0.00096087455,0.0004824631,0.0006633261,0.00023611965,0.98126894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06112684,0.0029830392,0.0002412792,0.00075474556,0.0016090675,0.000011488714,0.00004884834,0.00018378726,0.9330409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697834,0.00022807758,0.00053932227,0.0008137095,0.00040545443,0.0010350813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700105,0.0006752067,0.00056896993,0.0008965995,0.00040399164,0.00045420905],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034939445,0.00085626735,0.0009408897,0.00022048641,0.0023246915,0.00016738423,0.0008640055,0.0010323848,0.005848572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055923014,0.0008660926,0.000716105,0.0000088211045,0.0020864143,0.00019263699,0.0007780793,0.0009827203,0.00083357963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002643651,0.000055719982,0.00009807875,0.00040949034,0.00077940343,0.000560543,0.017097278,0.000016937976,0.0007229397,0.9531553,0.017263092,0.009576855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010110734,0.0001923804,0.0001358096,0.0005068105,0.0006525964,0.00010789605,0.0010759912,0.000029200093,0.0007887286,0.12949885,0.8651134,0.00088726945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069458336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024523932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84785026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085149193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004279188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767785985","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12420","title":"Reply to Hofweber and Ninan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Art history; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Art; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.48682226019361063,"score_gpt":0.4249492441244035,"score_spread":0.06187301606920714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767785985","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09646383,0.0007509707,0.000004022992,0.053642884,0.00018647649,0.0002607819,0.000022219125,0.000035368415,0.84863347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894965,0.0002746608,0.000093820825,0.002080456,0.0011911854,0.000042363947,0.0000027865221,0.000012142085,0.0068060625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846226,0.00018145409,0.00016672762,0.00045339577,0.00027939276,0.000456752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985767,0.00038152986,0.000051477884,0.0005291505,0.00021008015,0.0002510552],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012767923,0.00013808522,0.00025106143,0.000100615514,0.0023954017,0.0005240174,0.00037815678,0.00009017876,0.000304936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007185977,0.00010127669,0.000036073456,0.00002373925,0.0028310854,0.00018407014,0.0005386964,0.0006382805,0.00014770447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006751471,0.00005850501,0.00041357498,0.00003979682,0.000020950096,0.000013808944,0.008163646,5.649736e-8,0.000019869762,0.984884,0.0011369832,0.005181286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018147928,0.00048187003,0.00097170897,0.000018881145,0.0000048331676,0.000001905383,0.0005945141,0.0000022656143,0.0000073110555,0.70414025,0.2934801,0.00011488755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027949834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059280894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89303267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015016536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022063272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769791745","doi":"10.1017/s1358246117000273","title":"Three Ways to Improve Religious Epistemology","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Epistemology; Work (physics); Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.08454944971527283,"score_gpt":0.29289736016581225,"score_spread":0.2083479104505394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769791745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054997988,0.0005426771,0.0066730687,0.0666076,0.024830844,0.0024629484,0.0018050803,0.00022813857,0.84185165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99234414,0.000019537969,0.0024753741,0.0010024318,0.0029717055,0.000083153725,0.00007293129,0.000032606855,0.0009981146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982023,0.000016308655,0.00057579775,0.00046410967,0.00030560012,0.00043584747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979334,0.0000408376,0.00039536646,0.0011885517,0.00027087957,0.00017098589],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036933715,0.00028885517,0.00052428414,0.00010529131,0.00084929395,0.00012924166,0.00082781597,0.00011044378,0.0004801465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103331055,0.000262,0.00022669956,0.000013767137,0.001131828,0.00020315152,0.0003653762,0.00025672268,0.0002198617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005824512,0.0001454318,0.00016363944,0.00014211783,0.00012624465,0.000028126795,0.0031605395,0.00001906338,0.0001781519,0.97351414,0.021191554,0.0012727532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007573372,0.0005530617,0.00011863666,0.000059198468,0.00007504987,0.0000017352588,0.000099289726,0.000021244656,0.0011165594,0.36472717,0.6321758,0.00029493665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003687793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009135388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93734616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060531533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096781994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778934366","doi":"","title":"Dueling Theories: Thought Experiments in Cognitive Science - eScholarship","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thought experiment; Narrative; Epistemology; Cognition; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.045103569255898694,"score_gpt":0.31227094882319867,"score_spread":0.26716737956729997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778934366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89430267,0.0001317374,0.0000010113101,0.00030042444,0.00044297293,0.0003997915,0.000051419058,0.000023534769,0.10434644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975265,0.00003737967,0.00014364043,0.0006074506,0.00017202704,0.000020564956,3.4120046e-7,0.000015346892,0.0014767522],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971545,0.000052713673,0.00047928613,0.0005438328,0.0011613364,0.00060833053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995778,0.00042520286,0.00052653765,0.00015333026,0.003039894,0.00007703753],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060741184,0.00022771703,0.00032147713,0.00008547486,0.001982601,0.00023671765,0.0017608413,0.000070571004,0.00006009522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035906688,0.00014330646,0.00029678256,0.0010298992,0.01932596,0.0017001815,0.00057838793,0.00058214966,0.0000060838347],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014478415,0.0004039459,0.015211163,0.00022365621,0.000076068645,2.424404e-7,0.7760614,0.0000076479755,0.06182717,0.14224128,0.00009784288,0.0037047707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071056926,0.00013000832,0.005165261,0.0023370292,0.000095582735,0.0000031626794,0.5156828,0.00007250194,0.43639457,0.038770087,0.00028499306,0.0003534389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000114167815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000131879115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3745674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008586424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036837137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782079141","doi":"10.1111/meta.12279","title":"Show Me the Argument: Empirically Testing the Armchair Philosophy Picture","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Inductive reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; A priori and a posteriori; Point (geometry); Mathematics","score_opus":0.14925560794152187,"score_gpt":0.28480463656376265,"score_spread":0.13554902862224077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782079141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036472682,0.0016227687,0.00020565777,0.119570374,0.004813969,0.0010430535,0.00011351013,0.0004349206,0.83572304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9596997,0.000016907667,0.00029697196,0.021559618,0.015154495,0.00007483106,0.00001701189,0.00006527419,0.0031151974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974272,0.0004244589,0.00050906424,0.00052271626,0.000563232,0.0005532895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970984,0.00087037496,0.00030163128,0.0010702992,0.00054647285,0.00011286027],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011283688,0.00042856595,0.00044012602,0.00009942348,0.0022627995,0.0003356044,0.0010514102,0.00013818558,0.00062625285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036332512,0.00021728213,0.00035253062,0.00022075055,0.0032318255,0.00023298641,0.00021290683,0.00086422125,0.0006422616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026800884,0.00011841133,0.00017949425,0.00003954045,0.00028665763,0.000007103968,0.026814973,0.000004239334,0.00023291327,0.96489495,0.0063322573,0.0010626802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023815731,0.00025690458,0.00016169177,0.00003122103,0.00020098133,0.000009867735,0.00089719275,0.00010704298,0.00018094869,0.5999063,0.3977195,0.0002901595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000066245135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015450556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.923227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029275396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006673741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787680258","doi":"10.1111/meta.12194","title":"Truth Analysis of the Gettier Argument","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Scrutiny; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Construct (python library); Analytic philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Contemporary philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06180871193112166,"score_gpt":0.24956945785407172,"score_spread":0.18776074592295006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787680258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4652099,0.0013586713,0.00019995373,0.018779537,0.004358395,0.0004087854,0.00044497725,0.00010471165,0.50913507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922975,0.00001620678,0.000038817678,0.0005873974,0.00044551466,0.000011134247,0.0000040935297,0.000012429693,0.006586913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988386,0.00016785203,0.0003044174,0.00020348624,0.0003183342,0.00016729953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881935,0.00019122366,0.00019408006,0.00053766783,0.00020619875,0.000051460032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045905128,0.00013411872,0.00039080548,0.00017742917,0.00013194891,0.000020988484,0.00029279143,0.0000471932,0.00059495005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009804833,0.00006272643,0.0005012295,0.0001742921,0.00069752353,0.0000966529,0.000065491826,0.00009278284,0.000050302373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010559468,0.000074261974,0.0006944182,0.000011131586,0.0015107495,6.061033e-7,0.004608815,0.0000039199485,0.00018437633,0.991267,0.00080712343,0.00082700024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005668673,0.00009853695,0.0021631587,0.000029518194,0.0041118893,4.32947e-7,0.0005986264,0.000019924983,0.0019458528,0.62385565,0.36632454,0.00028498823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046271354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011510048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5270876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022988472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003211669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6514286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789571051","doi":"10.1007/s10988-017-9211-1","title":"Decision-theoretic relativity in deontic modality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistics and Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deontic logic; Expressivism; Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Modality (human–computer interaction); Meaning (existential); Semantics (computer science); Modal; Truth condition; Implicature; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Modal logic; Linguistics; Pragmatics; Possible world; Metaphysics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","score_opus":0.05751073847903755,"score_gpt":0.28891538731528504,"score_spread":0.2314046488362475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789571051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16681738,0.00045537515,0.00046887924,0.00084079185,0.00414634,0.00020099446,0.00005733205,0.000062793246,0.82695013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99403584,0.000039856528,0.0006839132,0.00048049798,0.0043721306,0.0000040419313,0.0000056684516,0.000015926771,0.00036213148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990537,0.00007920766,0.00027547087,0.00025731686,0.0001323618,0.00020194813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887043,0.00046222206,0.00007956782,0.00025150596,0.00026030562,0.00007595223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000469843,0.00014469572,0.00024112135,0.000075334334,0.0002717443,0.00006956554,0.00011110166,0.00008951571,0.00011982022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014911346,0.00012783599,0.00005209994,0.00003936672,0.0012318703,0.000023426312,0.000058439426,0.00027129214,0.00005861063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028894221,0.00006161866,0.0018590464,0.00004409872,0.000010980781,0.000007668933,0.006580847,7.415105e-7,0.0000014869906,0.99062574,0.00011078151,0.00066810194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024590947,0.00011220284,0.0006336213,0.00006573467,0.000023200073,8.221733e-7,0.00005380628,0.00032920807,0.0000112222915,0.937009,0.061361942,0.0001533391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015845252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007304941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8272185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015441552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031095104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792093414","doi":"10.1007/s10503-018-9456-z","title":"David Hitchcock (2017): On Reasoning and Argument: Essays in Informal Logic and Critical Thinking","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Communication studies; Political communication; Critical thinking; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science; Argumentation theory; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.05187436558278319,"score_gpt":0.31249694906645137,"score_spread":0.2606225834836682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792093414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91495067,0.00014794704,0.00012564546,0.0012305565,0.000529348,0.00016270338,0.000006443529,0.000041469717,0.082805224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969249,0.00005861847,0.0004749139,0.0016811149,0.00033624514,0.000012069861,0.000018224007,0.000008565143,0.00048536103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922127,0.000060998573,0.00019765383,0.00018450526,0.000139317,0.00019623314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995666,0.00017489106,0.00006143213,0.00009139,0.000060840433,0.000044817334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039239868,0.00010910859,0.00012694008,0.00008364109,0.00040905058,0.00017174546,0.000051345298,0.00005595941,0.00010158795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000957504,0.00009899733,0.000016881691,0.000021702892,0.00044417725,0.00046755362,0.000039307164,0.00016433101,0.000033073968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027751257,0.000036100366,0.0034990069,0.000041422663,0.000009543353,0.0000037452576,0.074609436,8.6963536e-7,0.00006377598,0.9188894,0.00014793515,0.0026710078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038363382,0.002306047,0.052478697,0.0007068334,0.00016432998,0.000042269916,0.05643518,0.0018332177,0.001980528,0.85034657,0.028839502,0.0010304743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015040231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059259706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08231986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019703308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014195387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4036994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792140173","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i1.5070","title":"Critical Review: On Reasoning and Argument","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Philosophy; Sociology; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.08499954083385157,"score_gpt":0.31517669242290136,"score_spread":0.23017715158904978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792140173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014538776,0.0031610087,0.000033490323,0.0027253337,0.00091809186,0.00014749146,0.000010209175,0.00007202699,0.97839355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94904333,0.0016461904,0.0003621202,0.040467102,0.0017478558,0.000019105704,0.000011147746,0.000011040223,0.006692119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999391,0.000026384694,0.00017799466,0.000099392586,0.00011091742,0.00019430561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954426,0.0001024248,0.000041354477,0.00012874145,0.00012677586,0.000056445926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031509247,0.000092857925,0.0001500714,0.000024602388,0.00027276957,0.000064571046,0.00007072225,0.00004006659,0.00061777333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025483593,0.000066826,0.000039367595,0.000011719759,0.0007121189,0.00019864975,0.00003957766,0.00016370519,0.00042561634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008844732,0.00001578769,0.000033970355,0.00018079675,0.000006928319,0.000002501589,0.0032696342,5.7146824e-8,0.0000017212827,0.9871895,0.005692172,0.0035981224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012372268,0.0005996961,0.00026487754,0.00045782025,0.000027751199,0.000009377657,0.00052471773,0.000025457475,0.00005195297,0.014216294,0.9835529,0.00014546695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021168731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041902535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9778607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000073323354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000146538305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6764184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792538394","doi":"10.1080/07468342.2000.11974126","title":"Fallacies, Flaws, and Flimflam","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College Mathematics Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Mathematics education; Calculus (dental)","score_opus":0.04480239454484786,"score_gpt":0.24269056182721496,"score_spread":0.1978881672823671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792538394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33129779,0.0017028219,0.00017383596,0.0018222979,0.0010103002,0.00023055197,0.00005804505,0.00008086053,0.6636235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5928331,0.0019568917,0.008065068,0.0013445583,0.0040268227,0.000016294585,0.0000066337575,0.00009591323,0.3916547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989793,0.000056663957,0.00037286774,0.00011914017,0.00021909647,0.00025293566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992917,0.00015531063,0.0001251478,0.00017074018,0.00012727134,0.00012978264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053218444,0.00015633072,0.0002890344,0.000065732114,0.0007409836,0.00026514803,0.00016970775,0.00006776574,0.003858126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048284,0.00012398405,0.00009712428,0.000029118099,0.0004318195,0.0001769187,0.000024166886,0.00038435674,0.00018679653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011812205,0.00014186188,0.000014702269,0.00012987574,0.0000927118,0.000056813253,0.045264367,0.000002782281,0.000031559393,0.92624927,0.023502544,0.004501684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052903814,0.00010731495,0.00002049261,0.00010171972,0.000076560784,0.0005477575,0.0075913407,0.00032166863,0.00003845054,0.27963236,0.7107971,0.00023622693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000048595493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000090471556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68729454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023281658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061872364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792688094","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2017.1402698","title":"Assessment context-sensitive logical claims","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Logical consequence; Logical truth; Taste; Relation (database); Coherence theory of truth; Logical conjunction; Logical form; Philosophy; Computer science; Psychology; Pragmatic theory of truth; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.17838227393059344,"score_gpt":0.3583122909505455,"score_spread":0.17993001701995207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792688094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3993906,0.00009982464,0.00144269,0.0017871988,0.0071729044,0.00021783654,0.000027236327,0.00018011942,0.58968157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838092,0.000008508845,0.00013919428,0.0040396983,0.0059844856,0.000008928335,0.000013281728,0.000013961733,0.0059827617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990403,0.00012636944,0.00019657981,0.00023442195,0.0001604361,0.00024190727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991971,0.00017468102,0.00007498025,0.00021355494,0.00027373276,0.00006593772],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030836367,0.0001297089,0.00021561036,0.000036903413,0.0003942869,0.00008174994,0.0001149095,0.0000927732,0.0010304163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029479712,0.00010257858,0.000092274706,0.000017873934,0.002566635,0.000117949574,0.0000560903,0.00025880444,0.00070828333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001342789,0.00007789438,0.00015835589,0.000009804607,0.000046285542,0.00001717276,0.042087037,1.2283101e-7,0.00014340777,0.94222164,0.011880771,0.0033440567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004983533,0.0006148651,0.0045350585,0.000039993785,0.000049930077,0.0000098667915,0.031897906,0.000046869,0.0007861883,0.056624558,0.9045611,0.0003353126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000095547264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007457939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89268035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031676638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004294181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794670849","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.023","title":"Revisiting norms of assertion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Assertion; Psychology; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Cognition; Cognitive science; Principal (computer security); Process (computing); Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.08697616063877135,"score_gpt":0.2940381862622796,"score_spread":0.20706202562350828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794670849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5578669,0.000098038436,0.00066526234,0.0002712239,0.00074621313,0.000098116005,0.000016048403,0.000059204653,0.44017905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967218,0.000011314425,0.00007923912,0.00020623159,0.0018106737,0.0000038204817,0.000039210212,0.0000067281676,0.0011209607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995746,0.00003419248,0.00014758471,0.00008426623,0.00007712593,0.00008221462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937487,0.000047125603,0.0001022958,0.000074275966,0.00038528867,0.00001614657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020907648,0.000049319573,0.00009029262,0.00003541562,0.00014705236,0.000021557875,0.000036617854,0.000034122473,0.00047527588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007725343,0.000043934317,0.000042267304,0.000018505554,0.00029112343,0.0001387641,0.000009906311,0.00006695927,0.00017036105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008414567,0.00016542566,0.0010900005,0.0005685556,0.000108902954,0.0000021648068,0.05257343,3.444161e-7,0.030817492,0.81496537,0.002188252,0.09743592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018802547,0.0011859038,0.01201978,0.0012976123,0.000543423,0.000012417055,0.01920781,0.0004336443,0.2397556,0.43301302,0.28971276,0.0009377623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016931479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001127788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43905807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000056291083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011230653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5203938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798608906","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.429","title":"Argument Strength, the Toulmin Model, and Ampliative Probability","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Explication; Warrant; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Rebuttal; Demonstrative; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.13417846293780228,"score_gpt":0.26761529086573543,"score_spread":0.13343682792793315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798608906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7600005,0.00015403824,0.00011727738,0.00081189914,0.00022682417,0.00030643446,0.00003588087,0.00005858717,0.2382885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993351,0.00006877097,0.00024765663,0.0014400602,0.00016526852,0.0000300476,0.000009007545,0.0000044936373,0.0046836846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993046,0.000033903212,0.00021101903,0.00011675271,0.00013047525,0.00020327437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994826,0.000114013084,0.00008408221,0.00018153738,0.000095692805,0.00004209988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024020382,0.00011765673,0.00014321541,0.000018599156,0.0005454075,0.000047691537,0.00012282752,0.00005085738,0.000105746534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004879404,0.00006847588,0.000053845557,0.000015176709,0.000987731,0.00025982092,0.00007026854,0.00023172106,0.00003688304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017141057,0.000047998805,0.0004098183,0.000026859163,0.000021587077,0.0000016414332,0.06841873,0.00024159308,0.0000028697082,0.929101,0.00070235407,0.0010083974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011941361,0.0008609268,0.008501417,0.000036030604,0.000091566086,0.000041491596,0.015632853,0.008684698,0.00022496386,0.6288345,0.33507755,0.0008199066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009659121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034540572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3343752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015263611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004850327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4194889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800787243","doi":"10.1017/s0012217317000518","title":"Early Studies in Human Reasoning: A Case Study of the Pitfalls of Interdisciplinary Work","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Cognitive science; Natural language; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.1478935531200956,"score_gpt":0.36783383029239786,"score_spread":0.21994027717230225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800787243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991748,0.00016390679,6.609747e-7,0.000060907998,0.0008418629,0.00026229135,0.000009840181,0.00001116837,0.0069013964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986836,0.0000028648835,0.000007772005,0.000034126708,0.00041436465,0.0000173391,0.0000012759112,0.00001101561,0.0008276926],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901325,0.00022783103,0.00034860833,0.000156141,0.00011482817,0.00013937276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908537,0.0001712503,0.0001930469,0.0003312033,0.00020159657,0.000017555329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043834234,0.00010686017,0.00032047185,0.000069581656,0.00026286015,0.000012541729,0.00019131873,0.00004109836,0.000017330874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078621975,0.00007173992,0.00007825487,0.000074536394,0.001463029,0.00006236105,0.00030128166,0.0001816217,0.0000037897016],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030896743,0.00058348145,0.025777474,0.000057997557,0.00014308828,0.00009043574,0.9221449,0.0000013746555,0.00004903915,0.050433245,0.0005406195,0.00014745782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020276012,0.0032710962,0.051633485,0.0007741212,0.00024345091,0.000034349763,0.90696484,0.000003377104,0.0004989256,0.033076886,0.001061645,0.00041024206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002238636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04197091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039732274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015684493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018067596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9755106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809304055","doi":"10.1111/theo.12150","title":"Disagreement and Conceptual Understanding","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17736725409407775,"score_gpt":0.2910917078219759,"score_spread":0.11372445372789816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809304055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12835066,0.00016910728,0.0013640319,0.0021909007,0.0029694813,0.00013231934,0.000018875295,0.00007296648,0.86473167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99040407,0.00001331485,0.00002814813,0.0009092196,0.0016895572,0.0000020975715,0.0000026251093,0.000007183391,0.0069437935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954695,0.000050684117,0.00009131579,0.00010910477,0.00007084682,0.00013109438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968565,0.00010606404,0.000034104723,0.00010483187,0.00003455352,0.000034810906],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002700536,0.00006867416,0.000095960204,0.000017244329,0.0002981451,0.000052057094,0.000057040255,0.000026243995,0.0012368875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020139545,0.00005415811,0.000021788735,0.00000832463,0.002114687,0.00007108827,0.000031029045,0.000070439455,0.000107657856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011584461,0.000008471687,0.00004099638,0.000005183566,0.00001924666,5.017701e-7,0.08807275,1.5455015e-8,0.00003536441,0.9079553,0.0037000384,0.00015053198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022738233,0.00013594939,0.000017145107,0.000014143322,0.000021679318,4.7867184e-7,0.05910906,0.0000068792656,0.00009625641,0.7659957,0.17428234,0.00009298496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004203148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048247568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8620534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019965413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011271232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811066564","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i2.4966","title":"The Epistemic Value of Deep Disagreements","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Monash University","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Humanities; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.048758547514344705,"score_gpt":0.2748051771569413,"score_spread":0.22604662964259659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811066564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16622715,0.00027868885,0.00020265284,0.0006227726,0.0019524888,0.00018192091,0.000016131866,0.00004634209,0.8304719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99167824,0.00003200892,0.00005519219,0.00082526624,0.00062954455,0.000007284549,0.0000064706264,0.0000057935777,0.0067602065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918526,0.000036640864,0.00030938428,0.000075823205,0.00016095267,0.0002319423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992553,0.00013668583,0.00016730881,0.00023480206,0.00017290292,0.000032989163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003894667,0.000095511685,0.00013431792,0.00002385733,0.0004768071,0.00005332612,0.0002696246,0.00004819782,0.00026302136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063695785,0.00005608963,0.000069598704,0.000021882985,0.0014598008,0.0001859047,0.00007324713,0.00012954255,0.00031498916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019508236,0.000016280177,0.0003525689,0.00002495331,0.000031053376,4.4007515e-7,0.013763606,0.0000021319054,0.000022893093,0.9808091,0.0004281334,0.004529346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051087607,0.0008928528,0.0030111063,0.000037147267,0.000057580728,0.0000061210926,0.008782393,0.00040997876,0.0007046833,0.17250694,0.8127998,0.00028047856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011450205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007546678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8254511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009984103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023428109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5378697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2813142211","doi":"10.1558/imre.32244","title":"Tacit &amp; Explicit Knowledge, by Harry Collins","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Implicit Religion","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Theology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06279518369909488,"score_gpt":0.31634681227504763,"score_spread":0.25355162857595276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2813142211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39027518,0.002329433,0.0014101838,0.0021993318,0.0038302145,0.0005229689,0.00017337072,0.00047715486,0.5987822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8915878,0.0003958336,0.00012879437,0.002463286,0.004086004,0.00006297666,0.00010223055,0.00006856539,0.101104535],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842864,0.00008592913,0.00039955668,0.00042898487,0.00018348152,0.00047340852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986082,0.00015312202,0.00015662124,0.0005255386,0.0004108468,0.00014571416],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027052776,0.0002692859,0.00034050088,0.00010323099,0.00063691154,0.00017738689,0.0003040599,0.0001847451,0.0004412527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065441935,0.00024433323,0.0001612674,0.00008194382,0.00054847164,0.00019922364,0.000080542624,0.00029783582,0.0033838076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025525116,0.00013242016,0.00009469057,0.00003955309,0.00004513664,0.0000012371812,0.016894985,1.7920351e-7,0.004993549,0.31810743,0.65848315,0.0011821552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003135644,0.00018558411,0.000043604126,0.00004290774,0.00004059589,0.0000067933593,0.00038817775,0.000009474927,0.0023472756,0.023157317,0.9731555,0.00030919517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008484017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039405236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5013126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060386523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006411111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2859406215","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.013.34","title":"Subjective and Objective Reasons","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Adjudication; Task (project management); Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.04211841625498198,"score_gpt":0.21920399104239144,"score_spread":0.17708557478740947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2859406215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033346054,0.00013525004,0.000030148984,0.000019555078,0.0006656062,0.00035992567,0.0004419259,0.00012710916,0.997887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00077229587,0.00016792463,0.000053010026,0.0000991111,0.00096954696,0.0000014281434,0.000053279153,0.000043473905,0.9978399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987507,0.0001386427,0.00013332676,0.0005023801,0.00018075378,0.00029420367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986846,0.0002324608,0.0002346155,0.000363867,0.00036331842,0.00012115641],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001573112,0.0003470677,0.00046304284,0.00014156214,0.0006607536,0.0000941606,0.00029582216,0.00037857972,0.0000692049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020447795,0.00037316312,0.00017735665,0.00000417568,0.0022286382,0.00013658876,0.00027453486,0.0006491146,0.0000037226698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008675299,0.0000150887,0.0000046075875,0.00009811556,0.0003061558,0.000037121423,0.023035636,5.2833794e-8,8.707403e-7,0.94895256,0.026823627,0.0006394342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036329543,0.00017378054,0.0000140799875,0.00012740254,0.00035139685,0.000004928774,0.0020068642,0.000002480202,0.000017589457,0.015102965,0.9814367,0.00039846834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033738845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015551564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95461315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017835981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028348019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2866961001","doi":"10.1111/cogs.12621","title":"Knowledge and Assertion in Korean","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Assertion; Psychology; Norm (philosophy); Cognition; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09377786921119317,"score_gpt":0.34251630995632465,"score_spread":0.24873844074513146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2866961001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6811406,0.00011553294,0.000058651007,0.00009318951,0.0004207188,0.00006625332,0.0000036520203,0.000015852405,0.31808555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975207,0.000011515085,0.000022642416,0.00024253695,0.00030905392,0.0000046777886,0.0000011857625,0.0000033376623,0.001884357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994003,0.000037423306,0.00008494331,0.00021342521,0.00008929069,0.00017458654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936444,0.00010323124,0.000029676146,0.0000589873,0.00039817806,0.000045512454],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062496,0.000058309903,0.00007545793,0.00011041283,0.00035982294,0.000084903906,0.000090271926,0.00001960251,0.00007927864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026330844,0.000049783575,0.000011971152,0.00009923481,0.005035139,0.00033168573,0.00005015677,0.00009254555,0.00012737338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021277143,0.00013274756,0.0072781937,0.000028576078,0.000005463756,0.0000035615471,0.17014866,1.6310114e-8,0.0030367945,0.7707358,0.00021553526,0.0483934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003121397,0.0020569444,0.39924827,0.0010274112,0.0001012696,0.000022217384,0.0990591,0.0015819002,0.0756016,0.32619828,0.09038113,0.0016004505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000061755294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023231993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4445375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014457097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008111219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99767256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883514089","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2018.1492837","title":"Succeeding competently: towards an anti-luck condition for achievement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Epistemology; Psychology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.10222320331851563,"score_gpt":0.2989897489072842,"score_spread":0.19676654558876855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883514089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84440225,0.00054093276,0.00059274805,0.02164526,0.011341217,0.00051617844,0.00062426535,0.000033193443,0.120303966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98846626,0.000005761838,0.00031312575,0.0016637169,0.009267513,0.0000027205308,0.000027872362,0.00002187175,0.0002311443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990457,0.000047152167,0.00035596604,0.00012477441,0.00013968482,0.00028668376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835896,0.000033915177,0.0002693676,0.00012332437,0.0007801439,0.0004342992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046983932,0.00013103634,0.00026572472,0.0002435231,0.0005791121,0.00014529802,0.00023700087,0.000062341926,0.00038123137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047714024,0.00011954183,0.0001548889,0.000028596824,0.0006696094,0.00038347073,0.000006448622,0.00020382392,0.000019089202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020097328,0.000038024067,0.00041899728,0.00005016698,0.00011006228,0.000017981354,0.012442847,0.000002700847,0.000223208,0.98165816,0.0040632877,0.0009544814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011107596,0.00213285,0.0011026369,0.00015842571,0.00015855071,0.000036560756,0.0024811954,0.000054464133,0.00069727656,0.45803457,0.53369486,0.00033783846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014542241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021430084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5296316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089716756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046114772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884250261","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-94673-3_8","title":"The Wittgensteinian Position","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Skepticism; Certainty; Epistemology; Philosophy; Realism; Argument (complex analysis); Coherentism; Foundationalism","score_opus":0.0622197870584758,"score_gpt":0.2454484686237472,"score_spread":0.1832286815652714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884250261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017445074,0.00047119163,0.000012518008,0.0014138723,0.0022095006,0.00014967995,0.000032799413,0.00008206905,0.99561095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001084154,0.00020044865,0.000022953804,0.0014222872,0.0043459437,0.000004418766,0.0000443734,0.00004211453,0.9928333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921143,0.000019548657,0.00022675759,0.00020113196,0.00017084477,0.00017026695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990695,0.00012686034,0.0001487098,0.0003652979,0.00024810113,0.0000415035],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021967388,0.00020545548,0.00019913455,0.000033380224,0.00074050226,0.00017913224,0.0001888565,0.00019084166,0.007022842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007471871,0.00012582216,0.0001705209,0.0000018234298,0.001370161,0.000054231703,0.0000417152,0.00032652676,0.0028097515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006053053,0.000003294087,7.494443e-8,0.000013130995,0.000075087264,0.0000023910877,0.004378614,8.056212e-9,0.000001309373,0.92618173,0.06808214,0.0012561654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003888226,0.00006988959,3.0164495e-7,0.000025984798,0.000052889212,0.000002144232,0.00027831714,7.757787e-7,0.0000067064907,0.32019016,0.6792095,0.00012451742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045581426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033309688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6111273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022566655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047191555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99796665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884478036","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-94673-3_2","title":"The Principal Argument for Epistemic Relativism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Skepticism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Principal (computer security); Philosophy; Function (biology); Computer science","score_opus":0.09381224563455343,"score_gpt":0.2751559788814113,"score_spread":0.18134373324685787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884478036","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002013376,0.0006819486,0.0001637709,0.001980704,0.0027869137,0.00068569515,0.000074747775,0.00008713828,0.99351895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010304548,0.00021621016,0.00011680247,0.0006212668,0.0036139048,0.00006298867,0.00005067665,0.00007224661,0.9942154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871325,0.000023812905,0.000428424,0.00033206452,0.00020948323,0.0002929425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982122,0.00062663446,0.00030483192,0.0004998617,0.00029833862,0.000058113903],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005937724,0.0003124528,0.00035700717,0.000039650415,0.00087188603,0.00015032497,0.0002932373,0.0002657405,0.0020316772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003716266,0.00019105453,0.00033806916,0.0000020938694,0.0013453793,0.00005643747,0.00007895529,0.00042106307,0.00076179963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016028896,0.0000073046767,3.2591822e-7,0.00006123608,0.00016606919,8.1708055e-7,0.005305677,5.13304e-8,6.240939e-7,0.9482417,0.04532951,0.0008706199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010126962,0.00009684931,3.0599196e-7,0.00004946553,0.00006639725,9.750875e-7,0.00018074775,0.0000041714234,0.0000045028887,0.43903777,0.5603043,0.00015322087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002265928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015063486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5149748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006170955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000092224254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887841596","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12535","title":"Accidentally Doing the Right Thing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; University of Notre Dame; Florida State University; University of Michigan; University of Southern California","keywords":"Citation; Philosophy; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.29127516127989167,"score_gpt":0.3883605457535414,"score_spread":0.09708538447364973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887841596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03532747,0.0009755183,0.000026415746,0.01395027,0.00035277547,0.00022541183,0.000007693113,0.00006127959,0.94907314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919796,0.00016075926,0.00007728321,0.0013538457,0.0040125363,0.000028005894,0.000003851305,0.000012351783,0.0023717438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980292,0.00047228162,0.00021294875,0.00034753804,0.00041939996,0.0005186326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981493,0.001088865,0.00004813568,0.00030479996,0.00030161763,0.00010728982],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020604366,0.00013930953,0.00019284336,0.00008818438,0.0024901833,0.00033161024,0.00047489905,0.00009782472,0.0016478788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002191918,0.00007713288,0.000060868948,0.00008797211,0.0047663813,0.00018877863,0.00035592687,0.0009639971,0.00040368122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040173745,0.000052594292,0.000053132564,0.000017731132,0.00003105672,0.000007358665,0.022371862,1.10324955e-7,0.000041219453,0.9749115,0.00048199622,0.0019912543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013443106,0.00036993212,0.00004910459,0.000017790671,0.0000069814046,0.0000034654436,0.0021939718,0.00001052557,0.000027727261,0.781106,0.21598245,0.000097595366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000079679034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012383141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95665216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026166217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003280978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888535219","doi":"10.1111/rati.12201","title":"One standard to rule them all?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Irrational number; Doxastic logic; Rational agent; Permissive; Rationality; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.13433064359998698,"score_gpt":0.29985269255798613,"score_spread":0.16552204895799916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888535219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1315742,0.000055225824,0.002255502,0.009065757,0.0017507691,0.00024419767,0.000070482725,0.00014193529,0.85484195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393157,0.000007538114,0.0007397109,0.006833242,0.0032960817,0.000013290148,0.000013265598,0.000017082564,0.049764104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994651,0.000031960408,0.00011493829,0.00012099368,0.0001236416,0.0001433856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995319,0.00003844163,0.000031672196,0.00017424954,0.00017338275,0.00005031936],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001849009,0.000065608605,0.00011840354,0.00001947693,0.00021127034,0.00009134096,0.00009054736,0.00003239205,0.002066657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003311699,0.00005778071,0.00003631811,0.000013665326,0.00022499412,0.000086920816,0.000023937946,0.000080192454,0.001747742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020742418,0.000028402155,0.000028857095,0.000010252104,0.000033566695,6.688456e-7,0.049173318,3.7569018e-7,0.00042231474,0.9076057,0.040647164,0.0020286138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012264535,0.00015672274,0.000059068905,0.000009448585,0.000016203201,3.0760083e-7,0.0009434309,0.0000065953363,0.0029649946,0.038284894,0.95733815,0.00009754705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007479755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001486754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.916691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017540924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036779547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888843569","doi":"10.5840/qd2018823","title":"Complexly Based Beliefs and the Generality Problem for Reliabilism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quaestiones Disputatae","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wycliffe College","funders":"","keywords":"Generality; Computer science; Psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.06604358357300329,"score_gpt":0.2885971400802377,"score_spread":0.2225535565072344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888843569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5816052,0.005134722,0.085170835,0.20399976,0.010091215,0.009325376,0.0022366561,0.0013374474,0.101098806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886503,0.0000137959105,0.0029038382,0.003744717,0.001993875,0.00019417898,0.00011320596,0.000027173151,0.0023588757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989803,0.00016462567,0.00025820924,0.0002604364,0.00012438881,0.0002120447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987382,0.0005118266,0.000110428584,0.0002691793,0.00031877676,0.000051553427],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081801787,0.00014026176,0.0002214754,0.000029057408,0.00090657425,0.00013636518,0.0001406131,0.0000515258,0.00009093963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013101674,0.00009049708,0.00009194695,0.000025821311,0.0027534463,0.00012112332,0.000032982327,0.00011839087,0.00003465045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009480957,0.000051942734,0.00010992454,0.00009252671,0.000021109612,2.0821213e-7,0.008830276,0.000012100373,0.0000135121445,0.98433435,0.005243439,0.0011958187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002150272,0.00024228747,0.0011474905,0.00003938699,0.0000899809,0.0000023313767,0.0009120735,0.0037176674,0.000049622584,0.47361755,0.5177924,0.00023892123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063180656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018484847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.512549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013051638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004509063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889157766","doi":"10.1086/699972","title":"The Science of Extraordinary Beliefs: An Introduction to This Issue","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.13464796545585672,"score_gpt":0.41029322234650056,"score_spread":0.27564525689064384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889157766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70644397,0.0009473177,0.00005351516,0.23932141,0.01426866,0.0012881241,0.00006554578,0.000020808237,0.037590668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95227504,0.000047777627,0.00012295827,0.00013320618,0.005671295,0.0000075067114,6.261326e-7,0.000010485186,0.041731097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979818,0.00038934694,0.00033534304,0.00010515036,0.0009209907,0.00026740375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99324536,0.000785048,0.00041749826,0.00026114302,0.005228022,0.000062931234],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013738839,0.000052033996,0.00013545703,0.00016193422,0.0018565446,0.00018952593,0.00063756347,0.00004155918,0.000086796055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004035699,0.00002932921,0.00009264432,0.00019058761,0.0013433701,0.00032815535,0.00008705229,0.00037809464,0.00002988727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003646211,0.00027343578,0.0022641502,0.000047611422,0.000280787,3.821529e-7,0.06530188,0.0000060814486,0.021803645,0.40642473,0.491392,0.011840673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002054786,0.0006149042,0.0011254924,0.000018857962,0.000027999671,0.0000025011066,0.0035749308,0.000015473293,0.0072953496,0.017259352,0.96981096,0.000048669044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009622476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003362581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.478419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020309628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033084344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889204284","doi":"10.22215/etd/2018-12863","title":"Testimony - An Exploration of Our Trust in Others","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Psychology; Information source (mathematics); Content (measure theory); Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.16028495885810404,"score_gpt":0.34646264203559135,"score_spread":0.1861776831774873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889204284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31716982,0.00011065092,0.000040833536,0.00017771978,0.0029634729,0.00033120153,0.00003777148,0.00007123556,0.6790973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7626257,0.000045135614,0.00047695034,0.00019002653,0.001475421,0.00004106182,0.0012895224,0.000058197213,0.23379798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991858,0.000058422684,0.00031507402,0.00019325798,0.00012886677,0.00011856001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993114,0.000023519184,0.00021384479,0.00019707225,0.00022704071,0.000027117268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022074724,0.00015015683,0.0002735705,0.00014670637,0.000070123235,0.000042470005,0.00012353405,0.00018016512,0.00045291116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042342974,0.00013196186,0.00006294428,0.000025059986,0.000086255684,0.0004999897,0.0000038496933,0.00018401844,0.00005288451],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008883095,0.00027688764,0.0001694761,0.0004110046,0.000052993586,0.0000020371856,0.33241042,0.0000046364876,0.00021852204,0.65696734,0.0050997217,0.0042981124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076142285,0.0009021732,0.00080878474,0.00041290815,0.00014982869,3.1781065e-7,0.74582464,0.00018545263,0.0031804105,0.1508756,0.09608776,0.0008107055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017270619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09839531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5060918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015095664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008093891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9180566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891405385","doi":"10.1007/s11229-018-01942-8","title":"The explanatory role of consistency requirements","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rationality; Philosophy of science; Irrational number; Philosophy of language; Consistency (knowledge bases); Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0653998525236487,"score_gpt":0.28024314335405126,"score_spread":0.21484329083040254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891405385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19047274,0.0013171448,0.000004230576,0.0004943887,0.0013675207,0.00012699353,0.000024435629,0.000039773568,0.80615276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99250406,0.000040738618,0.000019449122,0.00016599991,0.0005199798,0.000008576256,0.0000010143189,0.000009341427,0.006730868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993366,0.00008461157,0.0001872747,0.0001028222,0.00013386112,0.00015482877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991408,0.0002698117,0.00010251746,0.00028805985,0.00017034568,0.000028451399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041119094,0.00007182635,0.00011875023,0.000022317283,0.0003747403,0.00002774984,0.0001804686,0.00003229385,0.0003836776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015809893,0.000046297,0.0000626622,0.000012579837,0.0016702448,0.000070440205,0.000033296128,0.00007800491,0.00017081335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017457918,0.000038970946,0.00024078235,0.000017090939,0.00006201832,7.544491e-7,0.022252038,1.8205359e-8,0.0010802036,0.96873355,0.002034004,0.0055231364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094774805,0.00009898172,0.00015316544,0.000038859434,0.000030945583,8.4335005e-7,0.022303753,0.0000081579055,0.005792363,0.080495246,0.8908829,0.00009998004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018208055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001070794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8888489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008476038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039889026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61540866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891769145","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-90983-7_13","title":"Mathematical Problem Choice and the Contact of Minds","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Society for the History and Philosophy of Mathematics, Société Canadienne d'Histoire et Philosophie des Mathématiques","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Testimonial; Beauty; Constraint (computer-aided design); Feeling; Argumentation theory; Psychology; Focus (optics); Computer science; Social psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Advertising; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05685487559235594,"score_gpt":0.2430773254667431,"score_spread":0.18622244987438716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891769145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04217243,0.057925895,0.00004293561,0.06309274,0.0032829535,0.008335853,0.0041089654,0.00009475296,0.8209435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9005738,0.0070662796,0.014160649,0.00465596,0.0041575828,0.0006261736,0.00007321122,0.00070267066,0.06798366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962982,0.00007086819,0.0018077365,0.0005941195,0.00051264756,0.0007164439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912753,0.0027971128,0.0031493558,0.00063040765,0.0017374406,0.0004103788],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003554269,0.0009317456,0.0020614353,0.000137709,0.0026204817,0.00008637383,0.0013225585,0.0007570455,0.00021195953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063212623,0.00061537046,0.0017633899,0.000061906176,0.035245724,0.00032308899,0.00023922723,0.0010407966,0.000001994799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049321614,0.00008591011,0.0000092118025,0.015584364,0.0013067714,3.0458267e-7,0.12861817,2.1336925e-7,0.0000246596,0.85087305,0.0032080044,0.00024000628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009741072,0.00031661606,0.000009479108,0.0031918124,0.002133939,0.000030298801,0.004511007,0.00011989615,0.00003899218,0.86666536,0.1214904,0.00051807467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030022472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.079245776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85840136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012458046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007608846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892164305","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5040","title":"Deep Disagreement and the Virtues of Argumentative and Epistemic Incapacity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Common sense; Resolution (logic); Philosophy; Point (geometry); Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04200780743109701,"score_gpt":0.262437827132096,"score_spread":0.220430019700999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892164305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8424468,0.00050366885,0.00025909895,0.00080450485,0.0003147391,0.00026223663,0.000020240032,0.00002053657,0.15536815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997755,0.000114192255,0.0000990957,0.0010292847,0.0001835594,0.000009616664,0.0000037308887,0.0000031068555,0.00080240186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994146,0.000059064696,0.00022324192,0.000080429825,0.00009768149,0.000124943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945414,0.00017885739,0.00013978875,0.0001034146,0.000095176765,0.000028647499],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004199663,0.00009220053,0.0001771143,0.000024339142,0.00027064845,0.00004526999,0.00008134251,0.00003388879,0.00010820679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004223214,0.000051930398,0.00003438834,0.00001331758,0.0041619847,0.00021134573,0.0000834708,0.00010873778,0.000014004069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007678822,0.000012915372,0.0006871034,0.000046794026,0.000040236166,2.7186906e-7,0.11845289,3.238067e-7,0.000017041944,0.87828237,0.0000417313,0.0023415547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005332326,0.0022004796,0.014256035,0.00013105964,0.000260504,0.000027585605,0.11462316,0.0009864845,0.0020616557,0.7840339,0.07544539,0.00064139377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023088229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062266807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15530819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005864635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009762502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895653417","doi":"","title":"Stanley and the Stakes Hypothesis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Riviste UNIMI (Università degli studi di Milano)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem; Universiteit van Tilburg; Universitat de Barcelona; Universität Potsdam; Queen's University; Sorbonne Université; University of Twente; Universiteit van Amsterdam; Oxford Brookes University; Durham University; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; University College Dublin; University of Bristol; Universität Zürich; Radboud Universiteit; Università degli Studi di Milano; University of Aberdeen; University of Leeds; Queen's University Belfast; University of St Andrews; Birkbeck, University of London; University of Central Lancashire; University College London","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.08294824667313556,"score_gpt":0.23830596985821798,"score_spread":0.1553577231850824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895653417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47930136,0.001427342,0.000054345015,0.0075418837,0.00093312387,0.00044718332,0.00012443693,0.000115910174,0.5100544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9451951,0.00062196853,0.00006803594,0.00046329535,0.00031370533,0.000004244232,0.0000050044796,0.000026108211,0.05330253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987118,0.00017975135,0.00016927988,0.00034283235,0.00024633668,0.00034996806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981189,0.0005242361,0.00027183318,0.00079496973,0.00019454645,0.00009554746],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043765546,0.00024644035,0.00042871587,0.00008178301,0.0038877253,0.000384871,0.0006579971,0.00007607023,0.00013320701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014632473,0.00018159568,0.00016427034,0.000024518886,0.0035884208,0.00039915487,0.00030258225,0.0002822786,0.000055641645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015420311,0.000075162396,0.0027504337,0.00006598806,0.00044539,0.000050645278,0.064005956,0.0000013632932,0.000017860973,0.92255706,0.0053373734,0.004538564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053648166,0.00022311536,0.036833227,0.000117642914,0.0008275345,0.000010746105,0.101765506,0.00013167548,0.00004522149,0.026523987,0.8273499,0.0008066121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009662659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055086683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89603305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004255527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048824277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895901617","doi":"10.14195/1984-249x_24_3","title":"Ὑπόκρισις. Da arte da atuação à arte do engano","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Archai","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Visual arts; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.10126680541161233,"score_gpt":0.3048473235331375,"score_spread":0.20358051812152517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895901617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39979094,0.0051043066,0.001203586,0.0068796044,0.0051390273,0.0011068197,0.0002864058,0.0006823367,0.579807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96100485,0.00022906602,0.0001965652,0.0016694347,0.0046840454,0.000022394073,0.00004326966,0.000058592468,0.03209175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980712,0.00022930664,0.00042331126,0.00045573252,0.00029276704,0.0005276616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984181,0.00022103816,0.0001786684,0.00073943974,0.00027784944,0.00016490831],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006861702,0.00028044288,0.0004446706,0.000102540725,0.00061392726,0.00041074574,0.00037808734,0.00010112026,0.001578171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011737987,0.00024304676,0.00021477956,0.00006286585,0.0017232058,0.00021281105,0.00013468321,0.00047723125,0.0017696532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002105514,0.000065571956,0.00011867804,0.0001674002,0.00007695543,0.000015309282,0.04299243,2.2842664e-7,0.00032844144,0.936303,0.012528082,0.007382851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027182966,0.00020021603,0.0001224142,0.00013189342,0.00005796076,0.000008123967,0.0018112742,0.000026012713,0.00017011001,0.021247597,0.97563314,0.0003194332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010462411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031758434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036384332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008789117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897455137","doi":"","title":"On Difference-splitting and the Equal Weight View","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Triviality; Bayesian probability; Quarter (Canadian coin); Mathematical economics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Statistics; History; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.042116024476991365,"score_gpt":0.22224236074897746,"score_spread":0.1801263362719861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897455137","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16027871,0.0021077967,0.6778755,0.033628546,0.0037763335,0.0018418613,0.00028225314,0.0003957392,0.11981326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984725,0.00021825594,0.000021536638,0.0005368406,0.0005464183,4.6560626e-7,0.00000619761,0.0000106622065,0.00018712014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892855,0.00024870088,0.0001306057,0.00026627764,0.00019138296,0.00023446632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985242,0.0008346417,0.00016440017,0.00027822008,0.0001230024,0.00007553262],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046706267,0.00014985817,0.00032118507,0.00009427826,0.0009915698,0.000036656947,0.0003420922,0.000044343768,0.00038962945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006336285,0.000116825904,0.000134166,0.00004066769,0.004927957,0.000116186005,0.00018588398,0.0002788521,0.00003719965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013776444,0.000042646163,0.00001951717,0.000040388168,0.00006609722,0.0000030841832,0.07359566,1.8083738e-7,0.000065890694,0.92036164,0.0009910491,0.004676059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094103214,0.00018963902,0.0011392635,0.000077740646,0.00007681996,0.0000014487048,0.005788444,0.00012053126,0.000002184543,0.934223,0.057302456,0.00013746214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062789646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083647977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8381938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011865618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034494715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899197228","doi":"10.1007/s11098-018-1189-1","title":"Just too different: normative properties and natural properties","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; York University","keywords":"Normative; Naturalism; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Intuition; Philosophy; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of language; Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.30702692484156197,"score_gpt":0.31216995413700294,"score_spread":0.005143029295440971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899197228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91762394,0.01651804,0.000001798283,0.040885184,0.0017324153,0.00035685196,0.000016944032,0.0001756959,0.022689113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911082,0.00057083997,0.000013394543,0.0019662082,0.0033173244,0.000055533186,0.0000024817257,0.00001999118,0.0029460322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870974,0.000118479016,0.00030255833,0.00030789454,0.00023716371,0.0003241907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990713,0.00010969829,0.000091133654,0.00017400517,0.0004870455,0.00006682184],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015764788,0.00028698196,0.00047936858,0.000052937856,0.0011330051,0.0001202061,0.00015343764,0.0000648279,0.00003748557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025619153,0.00016333637,0.00008379152,0.000028101695,0.0053562415,0.0002784647,0.00026428368,0.00036488852,0.00008438803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016752961,0.00015523216,0.00028601632,0.000508501,0.0006101425,0.000004944168,0.24928166,1.1289478e-7,0.0005113497,0.74541885,0.001542409,0.0015132516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018858399,0.0024034726,0.0021400782,0.00084187376,0.00056761305,0.000025526075,0.068634056,0.000209735,0.0066610044,0.8322889,0.08253128,0.001810588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048381262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003735274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1806476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030666655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001352847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99735063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901566063","doi":"10.7202/1070737ar","title":"The Epistemic Goods of Higher Education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"University education; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Position (finance); Sociology; Economic Justice; Higher education; Distribution (mathematics); Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.17440107205352323,"score_gpt":0.35883219898788604,"score_spread":0.1844311269343628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901566063","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24424705,0.0050542075,0.000012412505,0.6137249,0.014512919,0.00057935977,0.000010855163,0.00007822685,0.1217801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867494,0.00012239972,0.000036332523,0.004931923,0.006624888,0.000068312154,0.000029939569,0.000016026162,0.0014207577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988946,0.00016849754,0.00041276202,0.00020799771,0.0001633357,0.00015283935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908406,0.000255492,0.00018036633,0.00023618579,0.0001704808,0.00007342287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000246348,0.00011828585,0.00018074393,0.00004730359,0.00015995339,0.00004698036,0.0002409328,0.00009005921,0.00015722687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015169648,0.000091534734,0.00007360677,0.00009195155,0.0007991956,0.00015683797,0.000032208914,0.00033352635,0.00006170501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020676383,0.00027717545,0.00033622765,0.00008726162,0.000011410857,9.1123695e-8,0.02257656,0.0000018325849,0.00014637185,0.9680695,0.0043680887,0.004104807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011915453,0.000082336475,0.0017116548,0.000056300243,0.000025110776,7.1751515e-7,0.004542731,0.000013471783,0.000105078725,0.7772212,0.21598884,0.00013339843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008899202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037515314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7425024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048836664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037101094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3732678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902641480","doi":"10.1016/j.jvir.2018.05.020","title":"Why Do We Believe What We Believe?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Radiology; Interventional radiology; Purchasing; Medical physics; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.046507984790370036,"score_gpt":0.28920517033938764,"score_spread":0.2426971855490176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902641480","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42502537,0.46277055,0.008292386,0.06547989,0.023996424,0.00045083716,0.000067862275,0.00006228982,0.013854399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933954,0.044450954,0.00078958337,0.00444216,0.012069349,0.000008045848,0.000017178687,0.000049695856,0.004219029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843943,0.00030115675,0.0006296209,0.00018006231,0.0002235547,0.00022614871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986808,0.00015917806,0.00038687116,0.00014841344,0.0005172451,0.000107507236],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010151092,0.00016464051,0.00045578164,0.00017519473,0.0002401987,0.0001519803,0.00022231747,0.000131656,0.0018472022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091270806,0.00012597781,0.00068519055,0.000028283514,0.0010646983,0.00057243835,0.00006051082,0.00040442107,0.0000414098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024097713,0.0005636125,0.00043879618,0.00028004622,0.0025577832,0.000061636674,0.020647123,0.000005755685,0.0004131911,0.8102547,0.13926364,0.025272759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000809099,0.0016543992,0.00039623736,0.00047920377,0.0001568024,0.0004421551,0.0025132874,0.000012598673,0.00007165126,0.09728084,0.8960342,0.00014953634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026484733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018532752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75677055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029687653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004882123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905498512","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i4.5065","title":"Two Types of Argument from Position to Know","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Position (finance); Point (geometry); Cognition; Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04554174471056073,"score_gpt":0.28244212796945395,"score_spread":0.23690038325889323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905498512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49491256,0.00010347089,0.00016239173,0.00055727316,0.001040912,0.00012561973,0.00006807559,0.000044121873,0.50298554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928316,0.000007047087,0.000500058,0.002499688,0.00089917914,0.0000050606645,0.000029216502,0.0000043495793,0.0032238108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951226,0.000015341091,0.00017943498,0.00007123906,0.00009421834,0.00012750953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995778,0.000036098383,0.00007004948,0.00012424054,0.00015474993,0.00003705342],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010881415,0.00007056513,0.00012217434,0.000039806448,0.00010446803,0.000029232171,0.00009727152,0.000033418582,0.0009946169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016755652,0.000055271063,0.00004492151,0.000016922682,0.00022547662,0.00015305277,0.000040267114,0.00006948367,0.0007663195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005057142,0.000043161137,0.00016793767,0.000016232092,0.000033568853,0.0000010667013,0.032364912,0.00001616402,0.0005441328,0.9605024,0.0025173624,0.0037424809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066526415,0.0016218211,0.0022409724,0.00008859864,0.00007641862,0.0000017163804,0.0046465523,0.00012744294,0.014392901,0.07948364,0.8962968,0.00035789597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060746033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011097067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8937794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009657694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001893611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907551885","doi":"10.1007/s13194-018-0240-6","title":"Understanding does not depend on (causal) explanation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognitive science; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.27557985721054296,"score_gpt":0.304684522003964,"score_spread":0.029104664793421053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907551885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3499629,0.000036108388,0.0018011887,0.004601566,0.008000466,0.0002991533,0.000050815215,0.000036952617,0.6352109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970051,0.000013808813,0.0001972468,0.0004165944,0.00094806036,4.4898974e-7,0.0000012862239,0.000014477279,0.0014029808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988224,0.000090305824,0.00027773855,0.00019271272,0.00041240914,0.00020444575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991215,0.0001461077,0.0002847188,0.0001514261,0.00021402838,0.00008224657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022534716,0.000099221,0.00014291822,0.00021682157,0.0007546903,0.00016065672,0.00039444814,0.000010907799,0.00008630589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010568257,0.00006784113,0.000095204996,0.000052220377,0.00096158,0.00048967934,0.00003103001,0.00021657911,0.00006228996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004488056,0.000029822819,0.000024434605,0.000031545424,0.000010919868,0.0000039836873,0.0070118983,0.0000386093,0.004060971,0.98829216,0.00015233213,0.00029846537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020019335,0.002735265,0.00038477086,0.0005368851,0.00005913131,0.000039062343,0.011540458,0.0003783038,0.012854666,0.9236526,0.04522372,0.00059318956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000018003416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005880473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6470422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058499536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051703715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5804544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908879543","doi":"","title":"Fundamental Problems of Epistemology, Symposium in Honour of Brian Grant","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Epistemology; Skepticism; Pragmatism; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of mind; Interpretation (philosophy); Linguistics","score_opus":0.05995603944548294,"score_gpt":0.26472231430440757,"score_spread":0.20476627485892462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908879543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73079944,0.00014700014,0.000036562444,0.00087941875,0.0009806205,0.00026739197,0.000037400787,0.00002677314,0.26682538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990955,0.000027886383,0.00012698819,0.00018873409,0.0002881266,0.000007881931,0.0000082767065,0.000012487715,0.008384637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891275,0.00011675235,0.00046459713,0.0001789287,0.000114901864,0.00021209536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993145,0.00009488595,0.00018938314,0.00020014727,0.00016587955,0.00003523343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050020544,0.00011720422,0.0003486239,0.00011292777,0.00008442156,0.00001328834,0.00016502266,0.0000787719,0.0005672959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018915604,0.00009648324,0.00009568099,0.000038345082,0.0017154209,0.000095977324,0.000049871138,0.00014948205,0.00003416983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005473871,0.00042325904,0.006516666,0.00039989562,0.00007641456,0.0000038228363,0.069151,0.0000025028216,0.009612068,0.91241497,0.00093897077,0.00040569258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009854965,0.009176994,0.025082001,0.0017910518,0.00037705805,0.000107556174,0.09121785,0.0005308459,0.11745633,0.25654057,0.4855488,0.0023159795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038298299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017582249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6558744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017251095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047804853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9811307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912804059","doi":"10.1111/rati.12228","title":"Excuses, exemptions, and derivative norms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Excellence; Focus (optics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036950695592575036,"score_gpt":0.2428804490552681,"score_spread":0.20592975346269304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912804059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80676705,0.00045659023,0.0002595599,0.0012153595,0.00089522725,0.00024506997,0.000020848911,0.00007008188,0.1900702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612351,0.00004917542,0.00010048008,0.00068193546,0.00032666294,0.000008519792,0.000016466869,0.000008267027,0.03757336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996086,0.000027833054,0.00009670428,0.00011257504,0.00006182572,0.000092496426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996898,0.00006933879,0.00004058269,0.000115480645,0.00006023744,0.000024570545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000092784394,0.000065536085,0.00010354427,0.000024356023,0.00014260525,0.00006947725,0.000042281237,0.00003164975,0.0007091477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001605687,0.00005257956,0.000023828617,0.000010415049,0.00016726529,0.00023809861,0.000017765891,0.00009568002,0.00032702796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035897576,0.000018110131,0.001523447,0.000028033654,0.00001867724,5.515445e-7,0.02563212,0.0000011205526,0.00029889998,0.9698401,0.0020734004,0.0005619476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004693621,0.00014009587,0.0042729643,0.00003071289,0.00002689224,0.0000024356698,0.008886294,0.00007893592,0.000589198,0.053050634,0.9321902,0.0002622981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000092705566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051668496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9301168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007936337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021803064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.776467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922307189","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i1.5719","title":"You Will Respect My Authoritah!? A Reply to Botting","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Appeal; Epistemology; Defeasible estate; Empirical evidence; Empirical research; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.05664282117680272,"score_gpt":0.27781461651055406,"score_spread":0.22117179533375134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922307189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24765325,0.00008931624,0.000037315065,0.002163849,0.0017529011,0.00030433704,0.000019731828,0.00017999524,0.7477993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9092876,0.000006743759,0.0005453953,0.013078146,0.0011589325,0.000018188251,0.000016128013,0.000019756031,0.07586913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987549,0.000039678125,0.0003684438,0.00021264878,0.00021243157,0.00041187124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991392,0.00011580295,0.00012708918,0.00036672014,0.00015048528,0.000100726385],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064002554,0.0001674133,0.0002567433,0.00010112633,0.00026423033,0.00016196698,0.00025267445,0.0000806332,0.0009475925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016610476,0.00013575255,0.00012521925,0.00005120518,0.000145421,0.0005714924,0.00011710773,0.00034059858,0.002390631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004634883,0.000022137641,0.00058725564,0.00006162847,0.000025984084,0.000008198238,0.037338294,0.000028296712,0.00008811008,0.95514417,0.004606897,0.0020426596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024755445,0.00040953959,0.00083617104,0.000037351903,0.000014248633,0.0000074657205,0.0055282237,0.000044019023,0.00008108389,0.0115503045,0.9809924,0.00025163975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024079991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012987787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9763855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002752173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005492843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922599164","doi":"10.1007/s12136-019-00383-3","title":"A Puzzle About Knowledge, Blame, and Coherence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Cegep Edouard Montpetit","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Deontic logic; Epistemology; Norm (philosophy); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Belief revision; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03447358632831219,"score_gpt":0.2694467857178974,"score_spread":0.2349731993895852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922599164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.316011,0.00048219148,0.0000041007124,0.0008613297,0.00048682408,0.00014191872,0.000012856536,0.00005217191,0.6819476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8975765,0.000069951,0.000028675497,0.00029100728,0.00027372013,0.0000044996386,0.0000056762656,0.000012730975,0.101737216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992354,0.000043241518,0.0001678995,0.00023663255,0.00009503354,0.00022181388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924684,0.00019238496,0.00008747884,0.00027792272,0.000119439625,0.00007593342],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018519002,0.00012563133,0.00024116682,0.00005564715,0.00015892602,0.00011790081,0.00014649834,0.00006342505,0.0016416605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062094754,0.0001051211,0.000067735135,0.000034284712,0.00040807464,0.00014782921,0.000058582304,0.00020210167,0.000723267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019706824,0.00016007153,0.0033898416,0.00019613066,0.00017895875,0.0000052289497,0.030974288,3.6254784e-7,0.0004496356,0.94228244,0.0198751,0.002468221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003288412,0.00011476307,0.0020062784,0.000054930584,0.00009604606,0.0000031135505,0.0024066642,0.0003206416,0.000099828445,0.009393174,0.9849286,0.00024713267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009964573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010554155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9650535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011482296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042869695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2931378986","doi":"10.4324/9781315712550-26","title":"Virtue Epistemology and Abilism on Knowledge","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Canada Research Chairs; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Epistemology; Virtue; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.06871299612366548,"score_gpt":0.27210033532031197,"score_spread":0.20338733919664648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2931378986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021997635,0.00095546053,0.00000788453,0.00060906535,0.0027889137,0.00024244764,0.000059862265,0.00011712991,0.99499923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008344614,0.00016365042,0.000032371358,0.0015087725,0.003741644,0.000009500891,0.000038140457,0.00007936916,0.98608196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986649,0.00005487585,0.000371711,0.0005420067,0.00012284615,0.00024364678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857163,0.00041730757,0.00017747516,0.00047897064,0.00024953036,0.00010505634],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031329575,0.00042484837,0.00063373306,0.00014963353,0.00030416896,0.000077644545,0.00019385265,0.000539374,0.009203917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024445178,0.00034255767,0.00018120774,0.000003484533,0.0026238798,0.000057786652,0.00010962918,0.0006109742,0.0034059947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001470255,0.000027951124,8.819889e-7,0.00011823397,0.000094056384,0.000007949895,0.0067742458,1.3193139e-8,0.0000014501082,0.9552041,0.036483042,0.0012733235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013255593,0.00030394347,0.00000212022,0.000075131815,0.000057968988,0.000006510347,0.00015518177,0.000001499026,0.000006013522,0.35792455,0.64107186,0.0002626973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056707806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021734142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6045888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003692533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000720216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942284900","doi":"10.1111/rati.12235","title":"Secondary self‐deception","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Self-deception; Doxastic logic; Phenomenon; Misrepresentation; Epistemology; Psychology; Sketch; Self-knowledge; Lying; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.028600403830870574,"score_gpt":0.23732171294123675,"score_spread":0.20872130911036618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942284900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35251892,0.00011473521,0.00006181298,0.0005644374,0.0018880712,0.0001487645,0.000011004251,0.00011912017,0.64457315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242995,0.0000130869175,0.000094815165,0.0009972119,0.0008202683,0.000005752467,0.000030449115,0.000010003978,0.07372891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995777,0.000035617002,0.00010539926,0.00010864315,0.0000746232,0.00009802981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969393,0.0000393251,0.000042237,0.00014193992,0.00006129106,0.0000212745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012676028,0.00006168127,0.000094282725,0.000024148516,0.00010848939,0.00006242665,0.000057181955,0.000040206873,0.0051385704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005784309,0.00005475929,0.000046137095,0.000009337427,0.00006022602,0.00018473816,0.0000115100875,0.00013644343,0.0027287134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036744675,0.000035696776,0.00026322808,0.00004716232,0.000024657125,6.517393e-7,0.032800317,0.0000025576435,0.0005889427,0.95335644,0.011439741,0.001436932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002240039,0.00006980906,0.00052313315,0.000007673976,0.0000139592,9.970295e-7,0.0019007428,0.00009242721,0.00035170576,0.011414578,0.9852872,0.000113768525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035908917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002836463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97384745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013425629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004137173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99804777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945461406","doi":"10.5840/eps201956231","title":"Epistemic Progress Despite Systematic Disagreement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Epistemology & Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Domain (mathematical analysis); Philosophy of medicine; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.04281006697869233,"score_gpt":0.27121869457112674,"score_spread":0.2284086275924344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945461406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8206332,0.0022709293,0.00004118363,0.005801317,0.0057468317,0.0019630597,0.0000336881,0.00014981549,0.16336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948258,0.000013265326,0.00025871868,0.00047680206,0.0003437918,0.00006972413,0.000005246743,0.000024346427,0.003982325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659973,0.0002626407,0.0009578889,0.0007382743,0.0007877067,0.0006537332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971915,0.0003384678,0.00075644813,0.0009888991,0.0005597584,0.00016495281],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002351439,0.00032505297,0.0009385631,0.00035825474,0.00053293945,0.00009137224,0.0012638584,0.00011741291,0.00025625358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014551281,0.00026275925,0.00023257748,0.00025421384,0.013629149,0.0005310499,0.00023118062,0.00031810984,0.0006354199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022077435,0.00015971747,0.0030506076,0.008781703,0.000060547434,0.000010594528,0.0112314895,0.000004770501,0.0011583383,0.9753935,0.000052798056,0.000073859046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030803706,0.00365523,0.004813924,0.0140429605,0.0006190127,0.0003200162,0.012619482,0.00058727415,0.005938418,0.9469071,0.0049348907,0.0024813283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055953253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029138286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1741926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011184466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022776607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945477073","doi":"10.7202/1059498ar","title":"SELF-DECEPTIVE RESISTANCE TO SELF-KNOWLEDGE","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Self-deception; Deception; Resistance (ecology); Confusion; Epistemology; Psychology; Phenomenon; Social psychology; Focus (optics); Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.033281223257821214,"score_gpt":0.28707770136782557,"score_spread":0.25379647811000433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945477073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03115564,0.017251832,0.001218892,0.014859882,0.00649641,0.0007714384,0.00018361433,0.0006073578,0.92745495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44364724,0.0058116657,0.0353671,0.015728893,0.01950308,0.0001712652,0.000033676573,0.00029464866,0.47944245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677527,0.0007730224,0.00052346627,0.0006798641,0.00021986714,0.0010285369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973784,0.00044980334,0.00020702269,0.00060113246,0.00095015235,0.0004134888],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011566518,0.00048576965,0.0005495556,0.0001518996,0.0012699347,0.00025637625,0.00052555953,0.00075248437,0.0006667296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019342954,0.00051876897,0.00026519402,0.0001638491,0.0016246538,0.0002414511,0.00016476172,0.0011596793,0.0029964452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007340467,0.0002901917,0.000114348186,0.0005897449,0.00026050908,0.000030095716,0.21738516,0.0000015065891,0.00007079075,0.72933465,0.05078258,0.0010670354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003438548,0.0004088824,0.0001636882,0.00035518824,0.00018592781,0.000010575892,0.008067627,0.00006222933,0.0014332596,0.054821342,0.93354505,0.0006023838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006237706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015923938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88276243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059364113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040927492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945850595","doi":"10.7202/1059501ar","title":"COSTLY FALSE BELIEFS: WHAT SELF-DECEPTION AND PRAGMATIC ENCROACHMENT CAN TELL US ABOUT THE RATIONALITY OF BELIEFS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Fribourg; Universität Basel; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Irrationality; Rationality; Dilemma; Irrational number; Deception; Self-deception; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03376995306588552,"score_gpt":0.2698096644149186,"score_spread":0.2360397113490331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945850595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728061,0.0024292946,0.00029117806,0.0040432033,0.000775673,0.0007028798,0.000059276805,0.0001061097,0.01878629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917088,0.0019001698,0.0006009601,0.0039985944,0.00079546263,0.000047173085,0.00003572553,0.000022310189,0.00089081324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850476,0.00036180575,0.0003928023,0.0002449871,0.00022869359,0.00026694185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987297,0.00028040502,0.000255439,0.00030841248,0.00034820734,0.00007781116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011847954,0.00018882295,0.0002684966,0.00004799387,0.0005774037,0.00021818125,0.00019243984,0.00017455047,0.00014314328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008902622,0.00013941973,0.00008749879,0.000038200513,0.0013391931,0.00025898803,0.00005990015,0.00036434535,0.000019633384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047751735,0.00021081635,0.0040240907,0.0004181501,0.00023688153,0.0000028995123,0.25670835,0.000020865185,0.0008363244,0.73338556,0.0012307769,0.0028775423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028672107,0.0019318579,0.06645184,0.0013327873,0.0007436995,0.00008679647,0.098994546,0.0012063978,0.014933019,0.4043945,0.40525773,0.0017996158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012120124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005242303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40402696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009157692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011283843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5685372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947594774","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v44i3.52236","title":"A Mindful Approach to Teacher Education: An Interview With William Hare","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Pedagogy; Teacher education; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Sociology; Applied psychology","score_opus":0.08741101982629987,"score_gpt":0.3300629314067518,"score_spread":0.24265191158045193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947594774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24733287,0.0022707412,0.0012711788,0.041137367,0.008702705,0.0005301692,0.000035272707,0.000025513358,0.69869417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7414069,0.000020314188,0.034465414,0.009265086,0.041931845,0.00006259126,0.00005409189,0.00006285634,0.17273086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885136,0.0001527292,0.00038049815,0.00016998648,0.0002808408,0.00016458918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777585,0.000081832455,0.000328209,0.00022921055,0.0013862718,0.00019860675],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005595488,0.00014741713,0.00024076455,0.0001518876,0.000234539,0.00014362784,0.0003271047,0.000049139922,0.001795914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009856168,0.00010434703,0.000094907446,0.00008519648,0.00032404275,0.00048561647,0.000020018899,0.00027952206,0.000110294095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008822858,0.002992487,0.0009316949,0.00010832017,0.00015368355,6.311705e-7,0.06515521,0.0000039471765,0.000017516992,0.67923814,0.24121827,0.010091853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016336226,0.00056248537,0.0026545587,0.0001918505,0.00007267429,0.00010109741,0.00993647,0.000002658623,0.00006120927,0.0113355005,0.9747443,0.0001738159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017168206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014650077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73352605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006749143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009927447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948887261","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i2.4940","title":"The Appraisal of Conductions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Inference; Dimension (graph theory); Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Balance (ability); Epistemology; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics; Pure mathematics; Medicine; Internal medicine; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.07020105457511219,"score_gpt":0.29186607081554206,"score_spread":0.22166501624042986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948887261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23445289,0.000115050054,0.000011157215,0.00042136686,0.0023857767,0.00009732751,0.000012022081,0.000029830173,0.7624746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795131,0.000018905781,0.000023867395,0.00031035664,0.0002414248,0.0000049069404,0.0000061442856,0.0000034567565,0.019877799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995489,0.000016963246,0.00017463896,0.000046019606,0.00008555095,0.0001279219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941576,0.0002217994,0.000090007146,0.00015710513,0.00009830297,0.000017000955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002015357,0.000054743377,0.00009537369,0.000018487164,0.00019444656,0.000035466568,0.00012848752,0.000034859047,0.00042132015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044312797,0.000031940333,0.00006596752,0.000014321891,0.00046374823,0.00018055974,0.000029378629,0.00014251402,0.00040778355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064641554,0.0000095002015,0.00024036187,0.000015450962,0.000016000522,1.1668312e-7,0.00627773,0.000011071237,0.000032265074,0.9917774,0.00094708544,0.00066651835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013908067,0.00011799309,0.00051209185,0.0000045468855,0.000009612962,0.0000024474941,0.00741915,0.000027698517,0.00012313452,0.010928873,0.98065007,0.00006531081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006629573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014275828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98084855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000027793908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029269635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52413684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953614120","doi":"10.1002/tht3.417","title":"Knowledge from Falsehood","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Premise; Verdict; Epistemology; Simple (philosophy); Extension (predicate logic); Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07153808595598073,"score_gpt":0.27900952413600877,"score_spread":0.20747143818002806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953614120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3039147,0.0070807245,0.00007614058,0.0034352266,0.006867273,0.00015490467,0.000058047972,0.000038918755,0.67837405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98385036,0.00008431182,0.00027623549,0.0005942377,0.009178886,9.450366e-7,0.000004640394,0.000028135024,0.0059822495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883515,0.00013595093,0.00047601078,0.00013730614,0.00022744262,0.00018817149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986564,0.00023478098,0.0004154481,0.00024211698,0.0003515797,0.00009970242],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039904378,0.00016448266,0.00044709854,0.00012567635,0.00010839169,0.00007184177,0.00033881984,0.00007942864,0.0014335484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037345242,0.0001263013,0.0002979985,0.000039803246,0.00020741786,0.0003366285,0.00004595996,0.000502163,0.0009110036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008810898,0.00025999077,0.00037614125,0.00006149121,0.00026319272,0.000021422398,0.027599767,0.0000028055651,0.000711262,0.9640687,0.004719707,0.0018273996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008423663,0.00030711404,0.00013079494,0.00014478629,0.00010300124,0.000012622068,0.00074062747,0.000009122663,0.00044489186,0.58492565,0.41215253,0.00018651223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017679811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034527788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67993563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026006544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008919927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954376322","doi":"10.1163/22105700-20191358","title":"Disagreement, Deep Time, and Progress in Philosophy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Study of Skepticism","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Convergence (economics); Philosophy of science; Economics","score_opus":0.046373980003366636,"score_gpt":0.315932148819268,"score_spread":0.2695581688159014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954376322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868148,0.0004701528,0.000021114753,0.0027512517,0.002173444,0.0005099988,0.000018647177,0.0000057338334,0.007234873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968133,0.000030659892,0.000031768006,0.00017862293,0.000686422,0.000013552471,0.000002353193,0.0000090993035,0.002234252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920005,0.00003797152,0.00028637308,0.000096541706,0.00027458958,0.0001044534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922615,0.00023575142,0.00018336927,0.00008493539,0.0002477335,0.00002208497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043641988,0.00008186992,0.00015349271,0.00008754123,0.00012233209,0.0000823857,0.00029651803,0.000019610834,0.0001510709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023587356,0.00005297641,0.00006730104,0.00001241796,0.00020235844,0.00013497134,0.00005755798,0.00017327078,0.000016850337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008016784,0.0031710211,0.06597018,0.00009028548,0.0024737807,0.000030003843,0.27615142,0.0001637415,0.00012344231,0.607667,0.0014186159,0.04193882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021580447,0.0068632304,0.09640078,0.0006875183,0.0006199845,0.00009882951,0.11835185,0.006021331,0.000105896135,0.65231836,0.09589638,0.0010553823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003539323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022239698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15779957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001819483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011094413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21603154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2960241565","doi":"10.1017/epi.2019.19","title":"A Defense of Intrapersonal Belief Permissivism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Intrapersonal communication; Proposition; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication","score_opus":0.03800906982054655,"score_gpt":0.2420789842637067,"score_spread":0.20406991444316014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2960241565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5071095,0.0005650388,0.000014335256,0.001048179,0.0013865437,0.00019998541,0.000042135718,0.000058151534,0.48957613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416477,0.000017652766,0.00008567561,0.00054764125,0.0004725424,0.0000061448172,0.000013428386,0.000019480203,0.057189733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990277,0.00007706487,0.0002795821,0.00020255565,0.00019612405,0.00021696073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923277,0.00015245959,0.00014008515,0.00027270662,0.0001424466,0.000059547452],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000272195,0.00013395742,0.0003003403,0.0000565308,0.00010014992,0.00002980461,0.0001615777,0.00007013419,0.0025790387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003539456,0.0001153337,0.0001641147,0.00002428573,0.00041763263,0.00010735068,0.000034755947,0.00019875003,0.0005517434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021229207,0.00008847258,0.0010589311,0.00023964496,0.00006803626,0.0000048434795,0.028325954,0.0000012581165,0.00091364083,0.9657119,0.002649327,0.0009167458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086823694,0.0003740724,0.0013562348,0.00014173133,0.00007004641,0.000010400067,0.005688482,0.00008647046,0.00059504417,0.027035555,0.96336824,0.0004054991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014265187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001502362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96071887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016447695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005613712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99833274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963008078","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199385195.013.17","title":"Virtue Epistemology and the Democratic Life","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Democracy; Epistemic virtue; Flourishing; Epistemology; Eudaimonia; Sociology; Humility; Virtue ethics; Autonomy; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04882605168476949,"score_gpt":0.22202326192059865,"score_spread":0.17319721023582915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963008078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006890457,0.00046869175,0.00004015172,0.00037363544,0.00093656,0.00047339982,0.00011463417,0.00007041324,0.99745363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013946133,0.0003277642,0.000018608554,0.00053724705,0.0007957978,0.0000025020606,0.000030731186,0.000035744397,0.996857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986447,0.00029239376,0.00021545435,0.0003966633,0.00017498726,0.0002757701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793315,0.00052306475,0.00048615158,0.00076932553,0.00015938899,0.00012893886],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037454325,0.00034587728,0.000701801,0.00008041871,0.001586089,0.00018905645,0.000788222,0.00039350448,0.00003284099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006589974,0.00027360424,0.0002463913,0.0000014896291,0.005601275,0.00011206684,0.00043133626,0.0008418877,0.0000031325428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014028754,0.000007790636,0.0000013624174,0.00018746064,0.0002896657,0.000048360056,0.004663709,3.0844873e-7,1.9229327e-7,0.9648566,0.029168267,0.00063595746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011675883,0.000054758537,0.0000026209862,0.00009173653,0.0005050614,0.000008284765,0.0004009289,0.000020537116,0.0000011511792,0.055122513,0.94233537,0.000289436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028223955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073749817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9131671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059634225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033140945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963407655","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190675233.013.24","title":"Assertion of Knowledge","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Pragmatics; Epistemology; Semantics (computer science); Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy of science; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11374037914745189,"score_gpt":0.3056375601450385,"score_spread":0.19189718099758662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963407655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031535033,0.004685892,0.00002274737,0.00007573397,0.006633234,0.00016379578,0.0001385308,0.000047927686,0.98791677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009616399,0.0074491356,0.000025212565,0.00008821522,0.0020329743,0.0000073165365,0.0004063161,0.000029103892,0.9803453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990304,0.00008642675,0.00033344177,0.00022287968,0.00015251288,0.0001743322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888384,0.00017560215,0.0002378884,0.00032200626,0.00034788123,0.00003276548],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019333344,0.00020087927,0.00053329475,0.00011035119,0.00007259462,0.000035432276,0.00020398501,0.00033123774,0.0030399477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002967352,0.0001536075,0.00022025079,0.000016531196,0.0002584102,0.00007649217,0.000053129348,0.00047335756,0.00090190343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004286067,0.00008667349,0.00001622076,0.0011610549,0.000091325826,2.889262e-7,0.0066730147,6.5186896e-8,6.8698546e-7,0.55560416,0.4292999,0.007062358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121241996,0.00008051726,0.000014510956,0.00030084173,0.00009764545,3.4441274e-7,0.0011804836,0.0000042730985,0.000033481912,0.005296372,0.9926865,0.00018379706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029323614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017130907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5633866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027151633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024648695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967973863","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-34503-7_6","title":"Disagreement and Change of View","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Humility; Scope (computer science); Irrational number; Worry; Context (archaeology); License; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Theology; History","score_opus":0.306624217954912,"score_gpt":0.3563655715107863,"score_spread":0.04974135355587428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967973863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017278292,0.036518518,0.000006819264,0.011941537,0.0018805631,0.0010431941,0.00024724283,0.000025158677,0.94816417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6333039,0.10393064,0.0004838866,0.016321866,0.0068103955,0.00039172012,0.0005386253,0.00020331549,0.23801567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980682,0.00010762113,0.00072743796,0.0005481622,0.00032570734,0.00022285928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724364,0.0016785527,0.0004629681,0.00027974497,0.0002873907,0.000047689387],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010806631,0.00043880162,0.0011203629,0.00017324694,0.00035706413,0.0000150349715,0.00014712712,0.0007413306,0.00010411236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007475442,0.00038353808,0.00010034712,0.000014608691,0.006079757,0.00005676557,0.00027457788,0.0015190939,0.000028611032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057517933,0.000031225012,0.00003351659,0.0028496326,0.00038495276,0.000006919898,0.032763273,7.5829706e-7,0.0000023037228,0.9631855,0.00023291622,0.00045148443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044366886,0.00016001608,0.000058154204,0.00058174063,0.00014366726,0.000005080641,0.0007704906,0.0000020182279,0.0000020794903,0.89657897,0.10090859,0.00034550257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030430727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008203164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7101485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004884248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014003218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968537301","doi":"","title":"Peer idealization, internal examples, and the meta-philosophy of genius in the epistemology of disagreement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brock University Digital Repository (Brock University)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Idealization; Epistemology; Genius; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Social epistemology; Psychology","score_opus":0.036255291160360824,"score_gpt":0.20527953434531396,"score_spread":0.16902424318495313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968537301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6003137,0.00040873562,0.0004153942,0.00020704902,0.00050975726,0.0007055506,0.00013867473,0.00003608161,0.39726505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7771024,0.000029741772,0.000009360677,0.00005216334,0.0000455099,1.4999054e-7,0.000012178997,0.000006443436,0.22274202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869525,0.00030881652,0.00025795904,0.00025444475,0.0003161179,0.00016739621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848276,0.0004499618,0.0003283531,0.00032724446,0.00036829148,0.000043398464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000027038532,0.00016956168,0.00042438423,0.00020679274,0.00020025844,0.000049234346,0.00056864676,0.00008159181,0.000016185591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004012513,0.00012345039,0.00025510232,0.00012833605,0.0010344753,0.00048027388,0.00025284325,0.00019752383,0.0000045562174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010783324,0.0003609514,0.05274746,0.0003508184,0.0016021773,0.00005382398,0.010028765,0.0001355415,0.0006040086,0.9226662,0.010249839,0.0001221008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005938,0.0006932402,0.008845139,0.00014621692,0.0020600243,0.00008103979,0.20875257,0.00001630777,0.0002368692,0.015595207,0.75699186,0.00064353686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084264355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014683373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.907071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005697456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057625562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50341606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969530177","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000295","title":"Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present DIEGO E. MACHUCA et BARON REED, DIR. Londres, Bloomsbury Academic, 2018, xvi + 746 p.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Content (measure theory); Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.060664613508670584,"score_gpt":0.28904848990148463,"score_spread":0.22838387639281404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969530177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7233309,0.015327796,0.00016749484,0.0350277,0.013785847,0.0025313052,0.0032142482,0.00041790953,0.20619676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9290071,0.0011847962,0.00008210474,0.016041918,0.005985172,0.00007876551,0.00055479916,0.00008275484,0.04698259],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976936,0.00038899685,0.00042083906,0.0005181398,0.00045810858,0.0005202889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998168,0.00064279407,0.00016361193,0.0007200466,0.00015432309,0.00015120562],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009609631,0.00029670578,0.00044974778,0.00006988658,0.00030950116,0.00015062523,0.0006946465,0.0002488249,0.0011494755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018353498,0.00021274977,0.00018242607,0.000048326037,0.00040758637,0.00023732707,0.0003259413,0.0009947146,0.0028737911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100623685,0.00018829718,0.0013880219,0.00006849823,0.00018539975,0.000011367604,0.03488202,0.000053528245,0.0010494797,0.30797738,0.6518549,0.0022405256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037785998,0.00012869998,0.0022779221,0.00005581832,0.000076928285,0.0000013788159,0.00072898704,0.000043017662,0.00042577158,0.026592031,0.96896577,0.00032580335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071888953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009200364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31711093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043878325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009529545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969893280","doi":"10.65214/2164-7992.1431","title":"Epistemic Inclusion and the Argument from Circumspection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Democracy & Education","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Inclusion (mineral); Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015444640374617718,"score_gpt":0.24583232272057887,"score_spread":0.23038768234596116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969893280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9177462,0.0012104294,0.0000424068,0.02133192,0.004041943,0.0004203996,0.000006751896,0.0000448214,0.05515514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98328,0.0001755096,0.000044906265,0.0013956049,0.0011400891,0.000022163409,0.000062995205,0.00001216801,0.013866541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919313,0.0001494655,0.00019823237,0.00020598751,0.00014055052,0.00011266026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992533,0.00021170836,0.00014248623,0.00025358296,0.000106568514,0.000032387525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040002307,0.000100828736,0.00014814468,0.00004387952,0.00078252185,0.00009608043,0.0001052418,0.000048910086,0.00044763714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003359014,0.00007156494,0.00005275026,0.00002456028,0.00023537857,0.00021995364,0.00007340807,0.00018071887,0.00024289581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040245788,0.00010591218,0.0019020883,0.000036471083,0.000033115546,1.05390086e-7,0.11021278,0.0000013407491,0.00044703664,0.8720504,0.0024341168,0.01273641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007163826,0.000035575747,0.0046947566,0.00006330693,0.00007758695,0.0000031570232,0.01374842,0.00014872312,0.00018929089,0.76704794,0.21310847,0.00016637461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001988294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000500957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21067435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005694232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001092898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60186046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972914130","doi":"10.1007/s11229-019-02384-6","title":"Elgin’s community-oriented steadfastness","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Philosophy of language; Philosophy of science; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Biology; Communication; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05240745648778027,"score_gpt":0.25869308278478226,"score_spread":0.20628562629700198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972914130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63080174,0.000082339655,0.000024994528,0.00037915894,0.0015784309,0.00015368628,0.000030971063,0.00010676886,0.36684188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9398625,0.000007566409,0.000034360703,0.0004886444,0.00031189536,0.000012753002,0.000017581075,0.000024777642,0.05923992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989207,0.00035451804,0.000181062,0.0001396728,0.00015605168,0.00024803335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987005,0.0004778162,0.000078160214,0.00055926695,0.0001275671,0.00005670823],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005723163,0.00013979028,0.00024048249,0.000060817205,0.00033691354,0.000061094084,0.00026314345,0.00006659045,0.0019285893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092340124,0.00011818056,0.00009595177,0.000028691367,0.0003792513,0.00016696643,0.00007578839,0.00053174386,0.0017786815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028684795,0.00022217362,0.0012574404,0.00016253596,0.00007648238,0.0000035421417,0.07973559,0.000003546225,0.00046361348,0.91424996,0.0015482119,0.002248194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003177178,0.00011706364,0.0003178934,0.00009073285,0.000035140394,0.0000029562232,0.050262105,0.00003927071,0.00066418404,0.009278438,0.9385972,0.0002772773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084607094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011001689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93704903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021322077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031794418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977484258","doi":"10.1007/s11229-019-02415-2","title":"Two types of epistemic instrumentalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Rationality; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Naturalism; Norm (philosophy); Philosophy of language","score_opus":0.033962397511502485,"score_gpt":0.25872796484278643,"score_spread":0.22476556733128394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977484258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6978743,0.0001658042,0.000001473286,0.0004061851,0.00086482,0.000096067706,0.000024381181,0.0000263705,0.30054063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817622,0.000016323422,0.00005057912,0.00016385889,0.00021122431,0.0000040729237,0.0000053505055,0.000013216605,0.017773217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940646,0.000054619308,0.000173397,0.00012541881,0.00010878771,0.00013134032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994595,0.00013012919,0.000092368085,0.00023677244,0.000054396703,0.000026844013],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001899048,0.000085407126,0.00019855387,0.000043046548,0.000046756144,0.00001826996,0.00013474833,0.00003516537,0.0017051636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028118957,0.00007009081,0.0000809327,0.000015119819,0.00029117372,0.00009510684,0.00003320762,0.000105322004,0.00063980167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000134690745,0.000047944897,0.0015040644,0.00011259101,0.000051573534,0.0000011432957,0.01319716,0.0000019936745,0.002944583,0.9801315,0.0002001087,0.0017938749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020697988,0.00052782526,0.0010346181,0.0006985836,0.00023596198,0.000020211362,0.04570699,0.00014412458,0.05306378,0.32929242,0.5660977,0.001108014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054470624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032358197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6508391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000126412515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000251823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978502643","doi":"10.1111/papq.12298","title":"KNOWLEDGE AND TRUTH: A SKEPTICAL CHALLENGE","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Philosophy","score_opus":0.056002850331290994,"score_gpt":0.2697287505763414,"score_spread":0.2137259002450504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978502643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13047627,0.0009989019,0.000021863507,0.014243083,0.002139314,0.00029469255,0.00003567024,0.00018238141,0.85160786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934991,0.000029150362,0.000031201056,0.0001643545,0.0020296385,0.000021709175,0.00001122053,0.000033375298,0.004180222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983908,0.00015021906,0.00033236056,0.00048991083,0.00020261024,0.0004341298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872345,0.0004744741,0.0000680806,0.00038933379,0.00011368984,0.0002309965],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035893492,0.0002574276,0.00043085444,0.000089388064,0.0002498815,0.00012196116,0.0001746443,0.00018771974,0.0007870663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003454923,0.00021692488,0.0001430825,0.00003422233,0.000786318,0.00020272614,0.000027132899,0.00055490446,0.001708987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032505624,0.00022053997,0.000027120968,0.00010796643,0.000040119,0.0000069451244,0.041228216,2.3632314e-8,0.000050585357,0.9545914,0.0002452769,0.003449333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007080059,0.0013480114,0.000117323914,0.000049776445,0.00003902401,0.000011190298,0.004833773,0.0001473303,0.0000055909345,0.9003702,0.09199344,0.0003763805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000055829805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002230353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86302286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019200554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036597423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982282514","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.3","title":"Moral Understanding and Cooperative Testimony","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Morality; Epistemology; Moral disengagement; Moral reasoning; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1488294891675281,"score_gpt":0.24871565293418713,"score_spread":0.09988616376665901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982282514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29046014,0.0025104296,0.0000917619,0.016499512,0.0039785425,0.0002451621,0.00008885982,0.00001395492,0.6861116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969695,0.000009634587,0.00005540394,0.00095839327,0.0008720417,3.1876516e-7,0.0000015649686,0.0000120255445,0.0011210955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942994,0.00004305012,0.0001917427,0.000082831,0.000083438725,0.00016900663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992549,0.000079446494,0.00012246633,0.00007767447,0.00017573449,0.0002897818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019344968,0.000094022944,0.00020619898,0.00016102684,0.00021779664,0.000115483985,0.00009903303,0.00004308296,0.00043157523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044425484,0.000079956604,0.0000571509,0.000025681098,0.00044907205,0.0002367787,0.000005754526,0.00021812045,0.000031289248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005631206,0.0000044497224,0.0024140377,0.000020469159,0.00004426634,0.0000415177,0.010179998,0.000010169574,0.000016485124,0.9857633,0.0014410485,0.000058589496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060917164,0.00047657164,0.0002695991,0.00015283837,0.000053412623,0.000069713096,0.005102374,0.00003748683,0.00002557705,0.9472259,0.045760185,0.00021716839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009503039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012851341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70650935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009087333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039410536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71713495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986504323","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzz056","title":"Practical Knowledge and Luminosity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Epistemology; Analogy; Counterexample; Connection (principal bundle); Action (physics); Philosophy; Accidental; Luck; Psychology; Law; Mathematics; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.09555211909169986,"score_gpt":0.32108479545437657,"score_spread":0.2255326763626767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2986504323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66857094,0.00018897238,0.0000070323017,0.0005949515,0.00058363035,0.00006875934,0.00000488882,0.000008876521,0.32997194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9412614,0.000008696791,0.00013776452,0.00016001213,0.0003989175,0.0000017968468,0.000003422346,0.0000059454355,0.058022045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995932,0.00003936833,0.00007742779,0.00012951354,0.000048591104,0.00011188654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962926,0.00014229967,0.000028243585,0.000112955175,0.00004866011,0.000038592243],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015873436,0.00006146183,0.00010943182,0.000018978611,0.000091678725,0.00004547387,0.00003516989,0.000046120025,0.0011569645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027772741,0.0000519134,0.00002781093,0.000006876444,0.00023038259,0.00010126943,0.00003252909,0.00014963582,0.0011805356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020309179,0.000206926,0.0067476053,0.00011309696,0.000051762334,0.000008292396,0.07032102,5.29818e-8,0.00030093713,0.8945289,0.02155833,0.0061427234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019414068,0.00006912305,0.001563137,0.000010326176,0.000023602071,0.0000053560434,0.0017017836,0.000023517543,0.00033600192,0.002345133,0.9936275,0.00010040653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032842727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003610419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97206914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000061257524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002784041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990335875","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-34503-7_4","title":"The Benefits to Inquiry Argument","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Focus (optics); Psychology; Empirical research; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.23532784793882838,"score_gpt":0.3519613905553805,"score_spread":0.11663354261655212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990335875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011027568,0.014247152,0.000010726408,0.037596416,0.006377635,0.0011067265,0.00013035865,0.000048803646,0.94037193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17702886,0.028336499,0.00036279275,0.033041988,0.013714485,0.00055796,0.00035787458,0.0002550279,0.7463445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973635,0.00014638314,0.0008387762,0.000743767,0.0005016352,0.0004059501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943468,0.0042416146,0.0003660954,0.00050127285,0.00045798568,0.00008624723],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018856431,0.0005678953,0.00090122595,0.00017824567,0.0015662995,0.000069229245,0.00036631158,0.00089452695,0.00006540577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022824688,0.00042587426,0.00014737251,0.0000240515,0.005446104,0.000046264235,0.00043182223,0.0026336012,0.00031888296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011003157,0.000022547261,0.0000050501067,0.0003765118,0.0004256831,0.000008001698,0.03117317,0.00005502163,0.0000011715837,0.96442544,0.0028877591,0.00050958846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024837902,0.00011141692,0.000012241781,0.00019889267,0.00006351114,0.000006357662,0.0011272635,0.000001469385,0.0000017216548,0.63144,0.36646396,0.0003248102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001264254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001404311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3635762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013968494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000329274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991162242","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-34503-7_2","title":"An Analysis of Ideal Cases of Disagreement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Carry (investment); Psychology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.19357284664180038,"score_gpt":0.36698499496930576,"score_spread":0.17341214832750537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991162242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033340475,0.0077542043,0.000045241533,0.0023668478,0.0015605687,0.00080736744,0.0012447966,0.000029440405,0.98285747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97576493,0.0027449613,0.00016144884,0.0007714668,0.00064612995,0.000029045072,0.0005344222,0.0000382784,0.019309307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974823,0.0001676273,0.0011199157,0.00056243147,0.00046024082,0.00020746212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506855,0.0030064185,0.0008474585,0.00045478359,0.0005738122,0.000049001454],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013063148,0.000417508,0.0017055527,0.0005304543,0.0002731256,0.000010505706,0.00023633656,0.0007337237,0.00018312663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012228655,0.00037187117,0.0002657873,0.000051001865,0.0063242815,0.000054113523,0.00015012022,0.0011978358,0.000008171134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014194532,0.00009119674,0.00020722569,0.0011875419,0.0033877208,0.000012032978,0.020821735,0.00019712564,0.000012128089,0.9737928,0.000069610345,0.00007892466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005008725,0.0004361426,0.0002465848,0.00025092546,0.0021431139,0.000005356456,0.0026615479,0.000046811667,0.000014687125,0.9836749,0.009553943,0.00046512502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000116579475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037835105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9724309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006281135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026788487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991357184","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-34503-7_5","title":"Objections to the Benefits to Inquiry Argument","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Rationality; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.24333865252077974,"score_gpt":0.35525924248763585,"score_spread":0.11192058996685611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991357184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015458667,0.0046002986,0.00005108644,0.07820649,0.007313343,0.0016793638,0.00026370207,0.000059656555,0.90767145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27822638,0.0063070958,0.00070562976,0.082431376,0.017579237,0.0010099347,0.0003908654,0.00024743355,0.613102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974907,0.00014082984,0.0007442191,0.00079121935,0.0004648569,0.00036816718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99634045,0.0023008042,0.00025475468,0.00052481453,0.00047306498,0.00010613707],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014696154,0.00054387725,0.0008697693,0.0002934754,0.0013223268,0.000055412584,0.00034694772,0.0007621434,0.00012051037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022438019,0.00042120458,0.00014600968,0.00004512731,0.002624849,0.00004443154,0.00045864223,0.0024336788,0.0006076556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007522376,0.000030425732,0.0000047015474,0.0002797453,0.0003656371,0.0000051065063,0.061078273,0.00035659852,0.0000016165881,0.9321579,0.005390895,0.00025392306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021175081,0.00016244617,0.000025277368,0.00022071907,0.000088826724,0.000009332633,0.0018208055,0.0000015202606,0.00000222814,0.57352245,0.42356682,0.00036782134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030739342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00351319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41817594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015981514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003171177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995016241","doi":"10.14746/il.2018.41.7","title":"Testing Epistemic Injustice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Investigationes Linguisticae","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Converse; Injustice; Affect (linguistics); Categorization; Social psychology; Psychology; Competence (human resources); Reliability (semiconductor); Epistemology; Ethnic group; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09095911920763457,"score_gpt":0.26836426598987223,"score_spread":0.17740514678223768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995016241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42245695,0.00024025595,0.0001228933,0.0013708454,0.0055543114,0.00037783774,0.00003720985,0.00039841322,0.56944126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831127,0.0000021628448,0.003093743,0.0016580867,0.002840649,0.000016845433,0.000036972466,0.00003555104,0.00920331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986785,0.000090587724,0.00040094918,0.00031769133,0.00022615495,0.0002860965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977214,0.0009647973,0.00019586808,0.00034580662,0.00064830156,0.0001238822],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039274938,0.00018583154,0.0002535962,0.00008520239,0.00030781492,0.00014395319,0.0002149318,0.00008530365,0.00041307867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042532785,0.0001787245,0.000063809486,0.00008097048,0.00069444085,0.00010705981,0.000051868217,0.00030893672,0.0018332492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040895166,0.00002644993,0.0056741447,0.00019358935,0.000024292713,0.000004694991,0.009903549,0.00003554369,0.00095238973,0.98220867,0.0006404276,0.0003321365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006412765,0.0002188913,0.004233399,0.0004007801,0.00021828325,0.000017234226,0.0045199688,0.0025513663,0.0007964826,0.6191309,0.36642185,0.0008495662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034710584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000105600484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5606557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003358795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013863207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996507848","doi":"10.1007/s10677-019-10052-4","title":"First-Personal Moral Testimony: a Defence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Political philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Deliberation; Constitution; Philosophy of medicine; Moral responsibility; Sociology; Moral psychology; Contractualism; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.07534344144396948,"score_gpt":0.30975995060497785,"score_spread":0.23441650916100837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996507848","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27527583,0.0019010609,0.00055663363,0.07893061,0.0030600256,0.0006944391,0.00006129913,0.00032485393,0.63919526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96186215,0.000074126205,0.0005544371,0.022539614,0.0005995075,0.00001266102,0.000006570827,0.000022039761,0.01432888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795854,0.0008600454,0.00022816301,0.00036980512,0.00026888622,0.0003145647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928934,0.006393065,0.00014249093,0.00022757618,0.00020494845,0.00013849615],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029966705,0.00019886521,0.00027624724,0.000037813017,0.00047499748,0.0001889466,0.0001652986,0.00029931727,0.0013164808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029297976,0.00016325309,0.000095970354,0.00003761351,0.0011979812,0.00060680544,0.00009480591,0.001943383,0.0005900126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040997058,0.00008662181,0.000241891,0.00008330709,0.000051107334,0.000023523216,0.024226183,0.000006436994,0.000030426358,0.97309375,0.0011022536,0.00064452045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048789947,0.0003369491,0.00024064274,0.00006444869,0.00012092817,0.000037438156,0.0077497936,0.00022856203,0.00002936422,0.567571,0.42281544,0.00031754607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013873968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006918784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6865863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015313432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068152505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997545171","doi":"10.1017/s0229705100008338","title":"Introduction: Belief and Agency","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03272854096133959,"score_gpt":0.23327151182994074,"score_spread":0.20054297086860115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997545171","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2525256,0.006360275,0.000060048897,0.66785306,0.010166998,0.00046207124,0.0012161742,0.000026447475,0.061329346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791449,0.000059843478,0.0002921656,0.0042384337,0.013765945,9.04066e-7,0.00005971205,0.000013105073,0.0024249973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998944,0.000061720326,0.00041502612,0.00014898779,0.00014586578,0.00028440577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900794,0.000016402146,0.00018293342,0.00015514174,0.00020377661,0.00043380115],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000301782,0.00014555374,0.00024531843,0.00023672552,0.00040210827,0.00009838363,0.00018178626,0.0000417021,0.010213819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022748143,0.0001407885,0.00010946398,0.00003762628,0.00037481968,0.0003114809,0.0000068795193,0.00032689754,0.000024462002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024211271,0.00005542033,0.0024348916,0.000037045913,0.00016052614,0.00020552325,0.026354954,0.000003918237,0.000062790714,0.5270189,0.43663803,0.0070037832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031792527,0.0005516304,0.0008993344,0.000017016031,0.000068571695,0.000090506794,0.0006730389,0.0000022203199,0.000019551017,0.18573438,0.81148535,0.00014049165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031163925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023807254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7266193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007465537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002821148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99400574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998387000","doi":"10.1017/psa.2023.94","title":"Beyond finite additivity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Additive function; Countable set; Lottery; Axiom; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Closure (psychology); Argument (complex analysis); Pure mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Statistics; Economics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.08063606741575231,"score_gpt":0.2888697624128787,"score_spread":0.2082336949971264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998387000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032844078,0.0008630343,0.00007447445,0.0037630696,0.0027996255,0.000088067434,0.00014045989,0.000101890764,0.9593253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969612,0.000019993773,0.00010581252,0.00034511593,0.00092086854,0.000004260782,0.0000027211024,0.000006440703,0.0016336247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999068,0.000020339528,0.00014985715,0.0002573514,0.0003189176,0.00018553884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993157,0.00024583933,0.000042862564,0.00019024628,0.00014785568,0.000057488232],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006208452,0.00008451933,0.00013083286,0.0001548242,0.00031311103,0.00011281232,0.00029342793,0.000023006338,0.0002910777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000111980415,0.00006976043,0.00007609525,0.00014570644,0.006749965,0.0005323748,0.00006173769,0.00016649858,0.00014707685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000174165,0.000025624038,0.000007243586,0.00009685529,0.0000064795095,0.0000037089615,0.010017677,0.0000017030588,0.0009839288,0.98692834,0.00048051332,0.0014461548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043351884,0.00007519144,0.00008418593,0.00007730222,0.000014495446,0.0000014203101,0.0003003265,0.00023712908,0.0019879383,0.9432737,0.053790014,0.00011494251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003965603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020073789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9641171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014518841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001340473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998568607","doi":"","title":"Collateral Beliefs and the Rashomon Effect","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Collateral; Argumentation theory; Cognition; Psychology; Work (physics); Social psychology; Rash; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Medicine; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.020396544838116714,"score_gpt":0.22962599050379426,"score_spread":0.20922944566567755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998568607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7760521,0.0026116013,0.000045465054,0.0044531045,0.0019436948,0.00041056148,0.00002604224,0.00007562255,0.21438178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782703,0.00016844076,0.0000040758596,0.00036667468,0.00069264165,0.00001943449,0.0000012523401,0.000009097465,0.020468114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994226,0.00013853646,0.00010994331,0.00012027534,0.000071399045,0.00013725732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933225,0.00040610964,0.000039942646,0.0001510644,0.00004095342,0.0000296586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036633166,0.000086322645,0.0001484736,0.000015960093,0.00026033795,0.00004170033,0.00008808559,0.00003559529,0.00029852116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005025192,0.000036999798,0.000059730148,0.000009800887,0.0008318203,0.000066414585,0.000033710716,0.00006531808,0.00012429748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009064481,0.000019302566,0.0016017568,0.000048291386,0.00006568472,0.0000047891644,0.021095255,2.9720146e-8,0.00068246986,0.94027096,0.004600529,0.0315203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041979337,0.00035780622,0.0015849167,0.00010195986,0.0001279792,0.0000115054445,0.00041063983,0.0000064703027,0.0021126044,0.16447212,0.826294,0.0003220919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058582013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020093101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8216934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006273245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011929479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32685974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999479811","doi":"10.1080/00048402.2019.1699127","title":"Evidentialism as an Historical Theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Internalism and externalism; Denial; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Social epistemology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Chemistry","score_opus":0.11479277114888586,"score_gpt":0.2956678500458718,"score_spread":0.18087507889698595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999479811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33074784,0.0031946828,0.0009240882,0.28255975,0.015258073,0.00049690536,0.000048632985,0.00022898754,0.36654103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842472,0.000027885919,0.00017329853,0.0030217443,0.010959452,8.472058e-7,0.0000023453842,0.00002662837,0.0015406171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850255,0.0002684608,0.0005358261,0.00016363451,0.00032667216,0.00020284728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987186,0.000088994115,0.00040989407,0.00015850464,0.00026062457,0.00036334034],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046402434,0.0001692484,0.00037546238,0.00008896294,0.00017183175,0.000100621466,0.0003947718,0.00008866224,0.0011026117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015126016,0.00014185102,0.00029962507,0.00004084958,0.00030737548,0.0006156017,0.000024263582,0.0006467561,0.00013597029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012402418,0.000109265326,0.000058806974,0.00004746397,0.00011749966,0.00018194213,0.032483254,0.0000031150566,0.00018453907,0.9587384,0.006921073,0.0010306092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050826155,0.0013601526,0.00004879828,0.000051032726,0.00016902311,0.00008586698,0.0015367207,0.0000018830114,0.00017054108,0.7593368,0.23653626,0.00019463756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001649168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006271973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65349936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006378761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093969415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006942597","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i1.5969","title":"Adversariality and Argumentation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Adversarial system; Epistemology; Argument map; Variation (astronomy); Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1232533442587925,"score_gpt":0.27046581143204734,"score_spread":0.14721246717325484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006942597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29870036,0.00014732976,0.00036304022,0.0059026005,0.0009303936,0.0002248992,0.000039402108,0.00015435343,0.69353765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99041295,0.000016123244,0.00010089053,0.008285411,0.00045653185,0.0000031574857,0.00001950618,0.0000028191043,0.00070263114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996255,0.00001687638,0.00012893819,0.00006807504,0.00006626727,0.00009431211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979085,0.000029038198,0.000051559586,0.00004425066,0.000036086156,0.00004824704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009839492,0.000058041784,0.000086761516,0.000010705812,0.0001293618,0.0000596104,0.000046149686,0.000031053445,0.00030503664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034998793,0.000047358273,0.00002737472,0.000010194562,0.0001844033,0.0002985351,0.00002828596,0.00009907272,0.000113253496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023703953,0.00000775295,0.00043540433,0.000047260975,0.00001426555,0.0000015187961,0.048897672,0.000005233098,0.000025512763,0.94720024,0.00083891785,0.0025024961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007898404,0.000365811,0.0028855384,0.000007331153,0.0000444585,0.000002409932,0.011827278,0.00036754663,0.00021780193,0.028983159,0.9542614,0.0002473905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006707793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050928233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9534225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000037196758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001279319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3339937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007649577","doi":"10.1007/s11245-020-09693-3","title":"Epistemic Coverage and Argument Closure","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Topoi","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.06250444303548561,"score_gpt":0.24254009791495218,"score_spread":0.18003565487946657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007649577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63730866,0.0017097112,0.000116394665,0.030036086,0.00089296786,0.0002574489,0.000061787425,0.0001646839,0.32945228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851999,0.00008766612,0.000027905224,0.0051496825,0.0008312545,0.000005012908,0.0000091820375,0.000010997393,0.0086783655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994587,0.000039295497,0.00012941872,0.00015710293,0.00008687013,0.000128648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969727,0.00005182715,0.000044339202,0.000098970166,0.00003239207,0.00007522284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009481864,0.00008943588,0.00015206746,0.000011320791,0.00013846936,0.000061081686,0.000069154696,0.000039452552,0.0005458226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022232261,0.00007749376,0.0000459308,0.000010657972,0.00019547214,0.00007353029,0.000035368037,0.00015756226,0.0001514579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001835747,0.000026193758,0.0006903287,0.00013883422,0.00004214589,0.0000137337365,0.05145292,0.0000020453447,0.0001870474,0.93686754,0.008800057,0.0017607851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039838275,0.00014569044,0.00025238615,0.00001619215,0.00003533694,0.0000029320315,0.0019331591,0.000032391403,0.0002511955,0.035700276,0.9610602,0.00017181026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005838578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007818692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9522602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007936474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000162786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5976375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009626191","doi":"10.22330/he/35/002-005","title":"Thinking We Know More than We Do","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Ethology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.1551963241839536,"score_gpt":0.3277417587784189,"score_spread":0.17254543459446528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009626191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19511388,0.019549325,0.00073614885,0.2226966,0.005080716,0.00076970155,0.00009200254,0.001376658,0.554585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96323264,0.00071996305,0.00042189678,0.016566932,0.004119913,0.000026077509,0.000039099494,0.00006940207,0.01480408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984465,0.00027271893,0.0003061211,0.00041080333,0.00018255175,0.00038127322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914986,0.000176157,0.00014276951,0.00030798124,0.00010640144,0.00011680438],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003818579,0.000222862,0.00040240173,0.00007203059,0.0006282468,0.00011334919,0.0004307269,0.00021140053,0.0017737607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089214904,0.00020048943,0.00016681751,0.0000348867,0.0011764766,0.00013000132,0.00016160289,0.00077473966,0.00044228946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010065158,0.000032161824,0.00019404264,0.000091025344,0.00003204107,0.00004711967,0.2260295,0.000002088789,0.0003626961,0.7582436,0.013612222,0.001343401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033929865,0.00021398146,0.00026813662,0.000050195315,0.00005406857,0.000011047769,0.011789699,0.000011268858,0.00012109433,0.21172577,0.77514464,0.0002708091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043581123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041399166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76811874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014747046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039504463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011876580","doi":"10.1111/rati.12261","title":"The knowledge norm of assertion in dialectical context","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Dialectic; Epistemology; Injustice; Deontic logic; Natural (archaeology); Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10974393688812152,"score_gpt":0.29286056849595526,"score_spread":0.18311663160783376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011876580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4929823,0.0016936209,0.0005496849,0.019498473,0.0019660888,0.00042409895,0.000012211119,0.00006328811,0.48281023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99729866,0.000018100332,0.000004832904,0.00036912368,0.00041597406,0.000006095841,0.0000024720125,0.0000039850584,0.001880779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996018,0.00007023395,0.00014620373,0.00006318343,0.000047594138,0.00007100396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995762,0.00023510658,0.00003639611,0.000059974765,0.000072461895,0.000019863865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015273609,0.000040163264,0.000090763395,0.000009066173,0.00010244217,0.000028132949,0.0000590272,0.000025767078,0.00007369923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015491826,0.000027713082,0.00003280826,0.00002044899,0.0001941985,0.00005741668,0.000011479148,0.000117973424,0.000069649606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016709982,0.000031923457,0.00025717437,0.0000206795,0.000008901881,4.1106554e-7,0.060243882,9.3661515e-7,0.0003887484,0.93523794,0.0014268137,0.0023658553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062927295,0.00030111708,0.002362043,0.000026892487,0.000028962866,3.2606783e-7,0.013938238,0.0015187347,0.0037654277,0.019275853,0.95799184,0.00016129279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007057768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008017079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.956565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008375946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004306412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4473718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012043692","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-35304-9_9","title":"Explaining Sherlock’s Glance. On the Perception of Historical Past","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in the history of philosophy of mind","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Intentionality; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Perception; Object (grammar); Philosophy; Relation (database); Philosophy of mind; Phenomenology (philosophy); Metaphysics; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.26631171774850754,"score_gpt":0.2884752393437134,"score_spread":0.02216352159520585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012043692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005824185,0.01611599,8.4700184e-7,0.0038369994,0.005199146,0.00028756226,0.000055110653,0.0000071910968,0.97391474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71345353,0.0018100177,0.00008486393,0.0012442537,0.009632233,0.0000481307,0.000022346647,0.00009708364,0.27360755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983103,0.00013728799,0.0006820107,0.00027962966,0.0004642616,0.00012647186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977486,0.00074903533,0.00083039375,0.00043305985,0.00021978503,0.000019125047],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006142133,0.00029783085,0.00090266234,0.00012688017,0.00013576685,0.0000020877796,0.00046950715,0.00014614114,0.00022947641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010359959,0.00019399807,0.00035866996,0.000012016576,0.0035558627,0.00003468142,0.00008044835,0.0006801846,0.000016112286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009733711,0.00006129029,0.0000032356875,0.0004701283,0.00023200909,0.000005506419,0.2787922,9.920284e-7,0.000018987268,0.6522198,0.067632996,0.00046555424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022084877,0.0006206726,0.000005264459,0.0006475172,0.00019085857,0.0000010308743,0.013105399,7.0372215e-7,0.0000030751346,0.1260702,0.8589298,0.0002046199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034598444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007792588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7912968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006126098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006855618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012377090","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqaa007","title":"Epistemic Judgement and Motivation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Judgement; Epistemology; Doxastic logic; Expressivism; Normative; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12314749931926806,"score_gpt":0.252096904582415,"score_spread":0.12894940526314697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012377090","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28435504,0.00021165842,0.0002233477,0.6854607,0.0003819748,0.00029389767,0.00002116288,0.00012891764,0.028923327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890546,0.00000869047,0.0000152073035,0.008660958,0.0020054153,0.0000130074095,0.000008137485,0.000013313952,0.0002206482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991626,0.0001155238,0.00021300618,0.00019906748,0.00015418963,0.00015561737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994222,0.00019473338,0.00007014502,0.00016486355,0.000059646478,0.00008841911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019112232,0.00012137292,0.00016648341,0.000015770973,0.00027868553,0.00008438481,0.0001546646,0.000046224628,0.00014658629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039708593,0.000080453756,0.000059210044,0.000024779092,0.0005731351,0.00010511047,0.000020561845,0.00028373508,0.00014939136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020916412,0.000025041007,0.000046278623,0.000036412435,0.00002875029,0.0000016487104,0.048343346,5.7106e-7,0.00019279242,0.94913054,0.00033117182,0.0018425093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031937336,0.00060830906,0.00045193676,0.0000144492105,0.000049071892,0.0000022335862,0.002443076,0.00020251353,0.000022605507,0.97799546,0.017741408,0.000149561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025499963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016813376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7046996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000064273877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010845187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3280809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3019303899","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/mdqt6","title":"Descartes’s Schism, Locke’s Reunion: Completing the Pragmatic Turn in Epistemology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Schism; Philosophy; Action (physics); Descriptive knowledge; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.09798251607200524,"score_gpt":0.26177161339147664,"score_spread":0.1637890973194714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3019303899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16116177,0.0013023824,0.0008361368,0.17493904,0.0016651124,0.00087817473,0.000022732713,0.00035059478,0.65884405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98308647,0.000015750242,0.0002866446,0.012470485,0.00082611566,0.000019723717,0.000014292597,0.000022253002,0.0032582697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842614,0.00043115395,0.00042086243,0.00025692672,0.0001504955,0.00031443883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988434,0.0005918539,0.00013626604,0.00026293052,0.000092061826,0.000073529925],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006339244,0.00016820422,0.00032829368,0.00004073578,0.0003372095,0.000098139324,0.00032598822,0.00007543456,0.0009413581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002429101,0.00011185051,0.00009438736,0.00006362158,0.0006487918,0.000111508285,0.00010109489,0.0005289015,0.00030464516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012527325,0.000037190057,0.0006737078,0.00010825787,0.000028340615,0.000015029616,0.057216123,0.0000133101,0.00006856484,0.93285763,0.008349983,0.0006193229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010996696,0.00032870588,0.0009887653,0.000114676026,0.00007244134,0.00003385113,0.04412496,0.003176062,0.0001354347,0.0774467,0.8719287,0.0005500437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004496852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00391017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8635787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022749131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051419804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020100236","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.9","title":"Credence: A Belief-First Approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.1280423749139143,"score_gpt":0.23477625197244703,"score_spread":0.10673387705853274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020100236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017812662,0.004311326,0.00035695714,0.102472275,0.002854274,0.00023998135,0.00014078058,0.00003322484,0.87177855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98696256,0.000019810523,0.00027513967,0.0061540175,0.0061606984,0.0000014531479,0.0000042767565,0.000021390319,0.0004006795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905103,0.000052260853,0.00034275796,0.00012842362,0.00017184367,0.00025370705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985137,0.00004534101,0.00021412809,0.000120130746,0.0002873769,0.00081933045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021276706,0.0001342971,0.00028644037,0.00013163738,0.00038358968,0.00012427435,0.00035703395,0.00006916082,0.0005411153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013007352,0.00011909189,0.0001890468,0.000056696706,0.00052614027,0.00022112872,0.000010256382,0.0004981821,0.000071672795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015886886,0.000024637518,0.00031523974,0.000118897784,0.00010921793,0.00014689953,0.06599514,0.000035831126,0.000009830614,0.90697575,0.025925307,0.00032737743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044389794,0.0003733549,0.000074980424,0.00006849459,0.000080568076,0.000055485638,0.0023988592,0.000042689826,0.000020254061,0.12519465,0.87100273,0.00024405982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013355553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070167664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9691499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046671572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063165167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5924833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020355059","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12668","title":"The relationship between belief and credence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Credence; Proposition; Normative; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.2932182884735981,"score_gpt":0.30660321665271006,"score_spread":0.013384928179111966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020355059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13494061,0.0026673093,0.00033576798,0.3750232,0.0010485108,0.00047581756,0.0001008918,0.00031132138,0.4850966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99536145,0.000020571948,0.000033776607,0.0016366816,0.0025376005,0.000008272589,0.00000833538,0.000011243031,0.0003820708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926656,0.00010060849,0.00018299183,0.00016739436,0.0001369428,0.00014549855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983333,0.0012767849,0.0000766647,0.0001565756,0.00006409909,0.00009258427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018380418,0.00010252061,0.00015254285,0.000014769879,0.0009003536,0.00013867815,0.00018854885,0.00003632885,0.000020414309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019343884,0.00007464146,0.00005144365,0.000028667971,0.00064543245,0.00011676222,0.000061205,0.0003140315,0.000103456805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006122612,0.0000066118837,0.0114536015,0.000028057542,0.000019325757,8.493796e-7,0.009619369,4.9960374e-7,0.0000019380063,0.9766238,0.0019929921,0.00024685802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018561613,0.00008624034,0.016204499,0.000018846938,0.000038557253,5.7834006e-7,0.000536062,0.000036434267,0.000011885958,0.75613624,0.2266009,0.00014411655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000261025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034689827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8604208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000065427466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017370254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6924883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025542601","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/zhb7j","title":"Knowledge and Luck","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Wake Forest University; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Luck; Attribution; Psychology; Relation (database); Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Data mining","score_opus":0.12054616959462217,"score_gpt":0.2819917698219886,"score_spread":0.16144560022736643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025542601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025424313,0.0008059774,0.00006543456,0.0057450943,0.00029626608,0.000051810057,0.0000043199957,0.00008708081,0.9675197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565558,0.000043416356,0.000078948084,0.003951892,0.00094073755,0.0000021953476,0.000002480505,0.000007666937,0.038416874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970573,0.000019196208,0.00006934348,0.00009896362,0.000029033285,0.000077759396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997953,0.000045916335,0.000013780973,0.000050153798,0.000037181235,0.000057645764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000050385544,0.000051732568,0.00008793752,0.0000086367045,0.00009909749,0.000039482133,0.000043055028,0.00002189333,0.00089445995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018461496,0.00003999214,0.000024561814,0.000007839336,0.00019970885,0.00005928777,0.000028252494,0.00008452905,0.00030591234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022923653,0.0000112499465,0.00008627984,0.00003428927,0.000010377432,8.1813687e-7,0.0509209,3.7072542e-8,0.000035485024,0.9233979,0.023840323,0.001660059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011230388,0.0000492949,0.00007038338,0.0000027546407,0.000010374606,3.9012696e-7,0.002658149,0.000059825925,0.000103975406,0.007544964,0.98931813,0.00006947844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003205008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030019073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96547776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000016919781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011247705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97937095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029758781","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6689","title":"Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patience; Virtue; Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Power (physics); Politics; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.051573007410098064,"score_gpt":0.28711575886308616,"score_spread":0.2355427514529881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029758781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68750393,0.00029247755,0.000261543,0.00036602162,0.0005599117,0.00013079045,0.000018133065,0.00004510497,0.31082207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992552,0.000045226294,0.000244865,0.0037686073,0.00016264997,0.000013255519,0.0000435431,0.00000478741,0.0031650935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933594,0.000042976182,0.00018340728,0.00013472063,0.00013250748,0.00017044993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955666,0.000056824294,0.00007228459,0.00012885072,0.000113444396,0.00007195694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012696437,0.00010342275,0.00012806847,0.000021474352,0.0003056142,0.00012183939,0.00007887226,0.000037926766,0.0006680439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003588537,0.0000828199,0.00003455882,0.00001863371,0.000383495,0.00056128704,0.00006666831,0.0001349148,0.00011137886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015958056,0.000056883826,0.00043691328,0.000024490155,0.000020433577,0.000015922307,0.07996901,0.00000884772,0.000023704792,0.9132173,0.00004403305,0.006166498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019454078,0.0032966333,0.012195899,0.000081525475,0.00014096314,0.0000704353,0.26464912,0.0010916732,0.003323742,0.37302428,0.3389809,0.0011994124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012329685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087938947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.540193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010978971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037853108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7314612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3030518148","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i2.6312","title":"On Presumptions, Burdens of Proof, and Explanations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Deontic logic; Function (biology); Epistemology; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.11392229568995417,"score_gpt":0.27014979179833964,"score_spread":0.1562274961083855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3030518148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2982115,0.00027025124,0.00014036418,0.0053289197,0.00039364415,0.00034469817,0.00014641235,0.00009406924,0.69507015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964592,0.00002202792,0.00006650285,0.0018074443,0.00019608747,0.000008524908,0.000018700217,0.0000033774813,0.0014181546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996018,0.00001339592,0.00015626219,0.0000629143,0.00008023264,0.000085395055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996968,0.000072337876,0.000066297944,0.00006487031,0.000060120725,0.00003961134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006596086,0.000059230537,0.00009998569,0.000027939213,0.00011317942,0.000024861525,0.000060418777,0.000033379296,0.00023265652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006436335,0.000046549052,0.00003109926,0.000013317726,0.00020360637,0.00013903627,0.000023297742,0.000113749265,0.000045390887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013982082,0.000016433482,0.000076195276,0.000059857506,0.000013007484,7.4962986e-7,0.02460919,0.000039928036,0.0000156207,0.9728856,0.0017823385,0.0004870804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013234871,0.0020163436,0.0034448705,0.00008347757,0.00010333709,0.000006871484,0.014810304,0.0011501,0.0011503773,0.10589691,0.86947215,0.00054175773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019321062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006365738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86768985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002359375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015711443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25474256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3031012013","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2020.102950","title":"Knowledge, adequacy, and approximate truth","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Consciousness and Cognition","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Denial; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Truth value; Attribution; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07589878001258941,"score_gpt":0.2646032141199301,"score_spread":0.18870443410734067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3031012013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71205366,0.0070590605,0.0012842761,0.0047000176,0.0012922146,0.00055642286,0.00018353612,0.0003589942,0.2725118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781865,0.00024513336,0.000022585436,0.0009315538,0.0005056122,0.000020763198,0.000031488467,0.000013199992,0.00041100115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993825,0.000053002474,0.00014172183,0.00022551486,0.000057850542,0.0001394025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995437,0.00012113316,0.00005535978,0.00005761271,0.000119813696,0.00010237943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000103278195,0.000118316704,0.00018681884,0.000028608347,0.0003085918,0.0001320153,0.000041592448,0.000054893404,0.00012054506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005320896,0.00010524684,0.00003148755,0.000023116396,0.0005934738,0.0001453135,0.000040442483,0.00013545013,0.0000351851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059927468,0.00008651047,0.00023452767,0.00056251435,0.00006440243,0.000008621252,0.0663772,1.9064161e-7,0.00025011142,0.88459873,0.001077927,0.04667933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006634594,0.001071023,0.0015197529,0.00046844652,0.0010062014,0.00005482968,0.08960774,0.0050827023,0.002257816,0.448364,0.44191325,0.0020196794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013005566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009223555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4408353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000026838013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002290836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42918417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033019224","doi":"10.33735/phimisci.2020.1.28","title":"Is mental time travel real time travel?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and the Mind Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Carlsbergfondet","keywords":"Chronesthesia; Episodic memory; Reconstructive memory; Autobiographical memory; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Semantic memory; Cognitive science; Explicit memory; Cognition; Recall; Computer science","score_opus":0.11869765040306593,"score_gpt":0.2704323677258901,"score_spread":0.15173471732282415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033019224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11257004,0.00046946193,0.0000033041263,0.07570991,0.00029952129,0.0002215817,0.000107604574,0.000021138841,0.8105974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99068034,0.0000884269,0.000040851526,0.0037929001,0.001207492,0.000004930173,0.000004981074,0.0000067241044,0.004173386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898815,0.00009885486,0.00018533228,0.00028453182,0.00024369186,0.00019946505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995432,0.00016551801,0.000080068225,0.000095181844,0.000029786537,0.00008624899],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005315952,0.00013601521,0.0002363095,0.000023601242,0.0009470327,0.00016493197,0.00029831502,0.000038802944,0.0010037612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019871813,0.00008001497,0.00010153947,0.000056029035,0.0040739137,0.00018301181,0.000051925454,0.0001449875,0.00040542317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006021634,0.000033988552,0.000013382596,0.000016449856,0.0000410623,0.0000022583008,0.1969449,3.3806023e-7,0.0005324014,0.79984736,0.0017538748,0.0007537486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002177317,0.0008013533,0.00016915292,0.000050863953,0.00017247663,0.000015309783,0.011590077,0.0039772764,0.0024135166,0.9355515,0.042440403,0.00064074557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006911017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007977006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8781103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000383567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035060708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033382224","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i2.6327","title":"Should Climate Scientists Fly?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Skepticism; Argument map; Epistemology; Climate science; Work (physics); Action (physics); Climate change; Sociology; Philosophy; Argumentation theory; Engineering; Ecology; Medicine","score_opus":0.21233637359910273,"score_gpt":0.3018732965723466,"score_spread":0.0895369229732439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033382224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06038132,0.00016034865,0.000081330756,0.003658077,0.0016045534,0.00015936758,0.00007159815,0.00024583723,0.93363756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778012,0.000033233122,0.00015247558,0.018424144,0.00091580016,0.0000071027544,0.000032643133,0.000010063583,0.00262334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990969,0.000019344958,0.00023981437,0.00013864251,0.00017850779,0.00032682315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995482,0.000038773433,0.00008433076,0.00012959489,0.000089701505,0.0001093818],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021793395,0.00011936885,0.00016851866,0.000033856075,0.00035355138,0.00016863216,0.00021479871,0.00006300186,0.0010237735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005659083,0.00009386694,0.000097758755,0.00003929974,0.0004413719,0.00040835515,0.0001032164,0.00024976296,0.0015705437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018775423,0.000016760601,0.0002463617,0.000087169356,0.000013401273,0.000010399278,0.026436642,0.000015613743,0.000032019507,0.9670326,0.004557899,0.0015323517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026247848,0.00019636394,0.00039096188,0.000010358029,0.000019247726,0.000003942927,0.0022348834,0.00028479955,0.00012484741,0.0039970344,0.99226946,0.00020565308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025553129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000928584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98771155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000069876446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028683115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035896799","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2020.2.8030","title":"The Epistemic Significance of #MeToo","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Virtue; Narrative; Harassment; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07227289438995121,"score_gpt":0.2552564044160197,"score_spread":0.1829835100260685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035896799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039572205,0.0017138032,0.00015236592,0.07153424,0.0028408193,0.00085921667,0.0003877636,0.00028570477,0.8826539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943645,0.00001355979,0.000044258424,0.0019587723,0.0022577595,0.00003246875,0.000011780009,0.000028620325,0.0012882656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849254,0.00014072502,0.00052448025,0.0002995693,0.00026974763,0.0002729092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855,0.00045426615,0.0003169025,0.0004019521,0.00015825547,0.00011860295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027937238,0.00020387133,0.00034749013,0.000024919818,0.00046540852,0.000110236186,0.0005039446,0.000071996306,0.00009791728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053704007,0.00015006503,0.0002145839,0.000059707345,0.0014740205,0.00010556679,0.000019534402,0.0003265515,0.0002053853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006226267,0.000045741606,0.000037704183,0.0001660529,0.00006238027,0.0000051001584,0.06969563,4.084917e-7,0.00037051344,0.9250027,0.0026582638,0.0018932429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005460863,0.0020223206,0.000053001295,0.00007675601,0.00009037207,0.0000033098197,0.015305112,0.00004608985,0.0006015264,0.45889032,0.5219483,0.00041683772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004245783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045090594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9547923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013537254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007337477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6119474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036287516","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000374","title":"Peer Idealization and Internal Examples in the Epistemology of Disagreement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Universidade Nova de Lisboa","keywords":"Idealization; Epistemology; Extant taxon; Discipline; Genius; Analytic philosophy; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Contemporary philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.10639091111988579,"score_gpt":0.27810875838514937,"score_spread":0.17171784726526357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036287516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8852718,0.0007436622,0.0013549086,0.03625958,0.0009818191,0.000444917,0.00013445088,0.00003205498,0.07477681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972058,0.000029919649,0.000020276002,0.002019318,0.00032136886,0.0000072531284,0.000048541347,0.0000047368153,0.0003427841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935675,0.00015277129,0.00018702615,0.00010518052,0.00011119908,0.0000870807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996219,0.00014569974,0.00007026244,0.000077529025,0.00006494423,0.000019655381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034097387,0.00006133271,0.00013938996,0.000021809503,0.000048284543,0.000023088263,0.000107655025,0.00003066025,0.000063880994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014824257,0.00004204071,0.000029046312,0.000018747796,0.00032483548,0.000045241148,0.000031234653,0.0000976016,0.0000064024557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000117058125,0.000029277151,0.005754113,0.00006323184,0.000014851421,0.0000037975642,0.17100763,0.0000038063656,0.00006959712,0.8198814,0.0024283489,0.0007322407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001779112,0.0008519277,0.054249093,0.00009656723,0.00011721442,0.000010405817,0.055632323,0.00040497887,0.00040060328,0.15840922,0.7275947,0.0004538954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010554066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042726956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7251663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004376235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010809581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23842646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037136899","doi":"10.7202/1069951ar","title":"CONNAISSANCE MORALE ET DOGMATISME","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.04025045925198805,"score_gpt":0.2844940444281234,"score_spread":0.24424358517613537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037136899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22503684,0.02897975,0.0007397484,0.031036424,0.0064019095,0.00063842855,0.0002492189,0.00018724758,0.7067304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8229958,0.0038005,0.0009772945,0.013327714,0.0010643478,0.000027567123,0.000044892444,0.00008110366,0.15768082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997664,0.0006059758,0.0004216418,0.0004301528,0.00020627888,0.00067195325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984761,0.0003961712,0.00023639001,0.000506673,0.00021569613,0.00016897821],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097491656,0.0003473957,0.00050681207,0.00007084914,0.0003442647,0.00024046638,0.000333668,0.00062599825,0.0033189673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009091658,0.00036469768,0.00024512425,0.0000513865,0.0014721743,0.00035831917,0.00008557015,0.0014103843,0.0017130066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027258053,0.00009462624,0.0017072901,0.000713642,0.00012224785,0.000041470837,0.029459378,0.00018751319,0.00026549402,0.9528486,0.012767587,0.0017648962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051986554,0.00019361646,0.0007497156,0.00046242497,0.00007720683,0.00003352433,0.005203139,0.00061019213,0.00051742885,0.1827202,0.80841184,0.00050087715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035611647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015852172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7956442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013625073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017543042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037751890","doi":"10.1007/s11229-020-02744-7","title":"Impurism, pragmatic encroachment, and the Argument from Principles","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of science; Metaphysics; Falsity; Philosophy; Philosophy of mind; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06874420071102443,"score_gpt":0.24410333624792097,"score_spread":0.17535913553689653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037751890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7085316,0.004708017,0.00024423964,0.060690176,0.0009626725,0.001029282,0.00018311558,0.00021646991,0.22343439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99451745,0.00012562455,0.0001456125,0.0024839214,0.00073593884,0.000037543374,0.000008461796,0.000013889748,0.0019315446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918264,0.00015489968,0.00019681158,0.00018537084,0.00013261243,0.00014767793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989993,0.00061705074,0.000096893324,0.00019086528,0.000028136226,0.000067774454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032423972,0.00011820908,0.00021591582,0.000011867561,0.00022316333,0.00012445574,0.0001591186,0.000033827113,0.00043005217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020759994,0.00006962121,0.00008774838,0.000012386606,0.00069795304,0.00008017665,0.00008882532,0.00017427368,0.000106923006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048218688,0.000037378544,0.00013326864,0.00006680898,0.00016632516,0.0000042829524,0.16356753,0.0000023860127,0.00006995335,0.83262086,0.0010052078,0.0022777994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095825404,0.000063980304,0.00019052994,0.000056577206,0.00020039182,0.0000012040214,0.021057045,0.00082839176,0.00040954896,0.06076837,0.9152268,0.0002388938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037811665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019176892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9142216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000079562615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020432382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47087696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037879725","doi":"10.1111/cogs.12850","title":"Expert or Esoteric? Philosophers Attribute Knowledge Differently Than All Other Academics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Descriptive knowledge; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.35991246098685536,"score_gpt":0.37126529886756787,"score_spread":0.011352837880712507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037879725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64468527,0.0026087249,0.0036960752,0.021443537,0.004518185,0.0012730419,0.00061474554,0.0006150124,0.3205454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98205435,0.0000817624,0.0000498186,0.013505443,0.0015191467,0.000024005663,0.000009349339,0.000025157977,0.0027309894],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983211,0.00009701467,0.00023300608,0.0005558259,0.0003127938,0.0004802591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987751,0.0002710615,0.00011675402,0.00014305346,0.0004191197,0.0002748704],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034455923,0.0002273518,0.00027583705,0.000064490014,0.0005235107,0.00018357583,0.0005555203,0.00008407859,0.00060489145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050179736,0.00016820872,0.0000971187,0.00017802583,0.003588721,0.0004566647,0.00019868193,0.0004136469,0.00047472547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034162158,0.0004386609,0.0016095124,0.00016682732,0.0001864807,0.00003819789,0.6902893,8.459707e-7,0.010706616,0.27226642,0.006745563,0.017209938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029724597,0.0016125091,0.0022057085,0.0004958724,0.00023676948,0.000013873026,0.076340176,0.00094171637,0.02374129,0.020500818,0.86880666,0.0021321436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030286965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008719389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8620611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039869592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019852261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038867160","doi":"10.1017/9781316818992.013","title":"The Non-Factive Turn in Epistemology: Some Hypotheses","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Epistemology; Turn (biochemistry); Mathematics education; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05567295360274918,"score_gpt":0.22104805179332532,"score_spread":0.16537509819057614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038867160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012995502,0.00032360465,0.0000084593,0.00010006338,0.0014372537,0.00048668197,0.0003262985,0.00007548911,0.9959426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0072853435,0.00024305754,0.000007596006,0.000245412,0.00111031,0.0000023268294,0.000023827684,0.00005911906,0.991023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983881,0.00013227484,0.00028726153,0.0005261808,0.00022543564,0.0004407367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979707,0.00060595514,0.00037536514,0.0006567635,0.00028775967,0.00010344801],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031483214,0.00044185156,0.0005805691,0.00017373636,0.0007801733,0.00011899856,0.00072878465,0.00044589074,0.000027363072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003125834,0.00038259785,0.00029776027,0.0000035444077,0.0035811886,0.00015930594,0.00032088856,0.000994809,0.00010711673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109236484,0.00001287362,0.0000020477164,0.00006591538,0.00020441467,0.00013525924,0.0038725322,2.0108041e-7,0.0000049999876,0.9673904,0.027834615,0.0003674846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041101727,0.00010983216,0.000020994143,0.00015599607,0.00015509753,0.0000060716516,0.0013432597,0.0000066430007,0.00007002607,0.0029697912,0.99431956,0.00043171472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006882179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005788553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96648496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001993368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001718156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039638078","doi":"","title":"In Gettier's Wake","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Wake; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Physics; Mechanics","score_opus":0.03054529119385646,"score_gpt":0.2620787002222826,"score_spread":0.23153340902842612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039638078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68858683,0.03409496,0.00035811402,0.006698176,0.0071151373,0.0002228721,0.0000078250905,0.000075265794,0.26284084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706292,0.0008381323,0.000016761516,0.00061302964,0.0035568278,0.0000033147248,0.0000021474343,0.000019145386,0.024321444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974068,0.00011857184,0.00023049861,0.00008615962,0.0001699212,0.001988076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995788,0.000042773692,0.00009633409,0.00010523448,0.00008167889,0.000095183306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026275679,0.00011367512,0.00017254913,0.00009907151,0.00017762989,0.000050336555,0.00015690598,0.00006113792,0.00023374526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045197274,0.000095441246,0.0000859546,0.000030183719,0.00013896174,0.0004887003,0.000018693465,0.0019297507,0.00017756395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010616031,0.000078321,0.0010601662,0.00000408327,0.00004449344,0.00000171421,0.0124881575,0.0000014531049,0.00001137418,0.9826193,0.0016645101,0.0020158528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035443946,0.00009878818,0.0001003418,0.0000070337687,0.00001930374,0.00010138374,0.011773081,0.000003303675,0.00001617198,0.5905211,0.3968714,0.00013365137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001594448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065413467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39520687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041210285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071875536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83839136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040569033","doi":"10.1017/s1755020319000522","title":"KNOWLEDGE, JUSTIFICATION, AND ADEQUATE REASONS","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Symbolic Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Externalism; Axiom; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Possession (linguistics); Axiomatic system; Philosophy; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.15314799005203852,"score_gpt":0.3214384787004625,"score_spread":0.16829048864842397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040569033","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025809456,0.69128114,0.00006268574,0.056811266,0.00036774328,0.0005933043,0.00002684269,0.00007304038,0.24820302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70562637,0.27310857,0.00007182923,0.014493232,0.0012138883,0.000059451886,0.000019850957,0.00002376054,0.0053830794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992236,0.00017655204,0.00026971515,0.00014171837,0.000075730175,0.00011271287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992466,0.00016515866,0.00015585845,0.00023440819,0.00014441909,0.000053563253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048201118,0.000099594006,0.00032305188,0.000011390096,0.00014760479,0.00001635613,0.00019756643,0.00002650586,0.0003887697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020937431,0.00005718777,0.00008150539,0.000051887277,0.00055529526,0.000044124878,0.000048456895,0.0001452588,0.00018906039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016113268,0.000022087368,0.000008051634,0.003826077,0.000029036548,3.2337283e-7,0.017011262,6.31288e-8,0.00001221337,0.95995927,0.009264932,0.009865092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108968605,0.00007502933,0.0002480037,0.0015080281,0.00030847147,0.0000044139592,0.0018055172,0.000013936581,0.00002666373,0.024456048,0.97129774,0.00014717208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020307327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010573751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9620328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000039654506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003185608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42567557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043210258","doi":"","title":"The Slippery Business of Measuring Beliefs","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Slippery slope; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14837649731055663,"score_gpt":0.23538422057063976,"score_spread":0.08700772326008313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043210258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07970863,0.0014452382,0.0003682023,0.032081075,0.0015950721,0.00019553506,0.000012249923,0.00015023169,0.88444376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899155,0.000080975675,0.000038844053,0.0014383795,0.000868489,0.000003194943,0.000001499207,0.000009752747,0.007643354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948996,0.00003416962,0.00015819613,0.00008835226,0.00011735524,0.00011194435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994522,0.00013749287,0.00005429148,0.00011918637,0.00020572134,0.000031152544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001764503,0.00006316498,0.00012004594,0.000009109173,0.00025443643,0.00004370282,0.00014456635,0.00002336341,0.00017434292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010397465,0.00003776359,0.000053891355,0.00002650674,0.00034537612,0.000067646535,0.000038789734,0.00010316099,0.00004799374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009979394,0.000016934353,0.00012089248,0.00007720992,0.000037572572,8.209599e-7,0.027487835,0.000005692933,0.00037439726,0.96603245,0.00376038,0.0020758442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021734467,0.00005153954,0.00075726456,0.000025468391,0.000029720046,6.6098943e-7,0.010043736,0.0000536222,0.0020755609,0.0098311575,0.9767638,0.00015015497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001513653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050828257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9730034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000031876023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030378864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19569449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047744003","doi":"10.5840/envirophil20201716","title":"Thinking Ecologically, Knowing Responsibly","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Situated; Epistemology; Certainty; Agency (philosophy); Neutrality; Sociology; Order (exchange); Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.08090052525648017,"score_gpt":0.23200156080576492,"score_spread":0.15110103554928475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047744003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23711474,0.00083279505,0.0000651012,0.038999084,0.0010960343,0.00044453455,0.00009724883,0.0003329389,0.72101754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981499,0.000037890553,0.00029244114,0.014997481,0.0020794724,0.000010461853,0.000030272184,0.000028441462,0.0010245219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988087,0.000118955664,0.00023813917,0.00033351118,0.00026292144,0.0002378158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994828,0.00012401298,0.00008542563,0.00017444076,0.000004583451,0.00012874357],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019637166,0.00018559147,0.00022395558,0.000030664,0.00045131342,0.0000796339,0.0002827327,0.00008069473,0.0022153242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003591013,0.00016664983,0.00015031462,0.00001915933,0.00056815636,0.0002082469,0.00017684764,0.00036793354,0.0013290206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009230477,0.00018872142,0.0007516558,0.000039211798,0.0000844034,0.00006644637,0.039404564,0.000022143904,0.0025980324,0.9532659,0.0020618427,0.0014247457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055039534,0.000505638,0.0008784476,0.000021461952,0.000054717922,0.0000035257417,0.0018794249,0.000047382127,0.0005382341,0.46215308,0.53292286,0.0004448134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000044888225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000045036786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7443843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040026698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010218575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3066479015","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12726","title":"There is a distinctively epistemic kind of blame","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"Research Manitoba","keywords":"Blame; Epistemology; Skepticism; Philosophy; Focus (optics); Philosophy of science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.5326447610816943,"score_gpt":0.3799021787370339,"score_spread":0.15274258234466043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3066479015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117785,0.0024085124,0.000027296186,0.04681481,0.00008192384,0.00033802743,0.00015743425,0.00004946929,0.8323375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971096,0.00025808212,0.00004160262,0.0010469182,0.0008252854,0.000022588403,0.000007258415,0.0000140985,0.000674593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820256,0.00034275497,0.00028817277,0.00040446743,0.0003850447,0.00037700028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855167,0.00069533987,0.000083095365,0.0001912155,0.00029023952,0.00018842309],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062250084,0.00015566275,0.00036636222,0.000063485546,0.00036399005,0.00006149311,0.00031653626,0.00011834743,0.0013336319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032520498,0.00011275673,0.00008743931,0.00010421302,0.0028087485,0.00009187455,0.00023205322,0.00079367065,0.0001195192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016215783,0.00011063637,0.00025183862,0.00020244853,0.000057877,0.000008970924,0.031794727,2.4596557e-7,0.00013764853,0.96558857,0.00025637686,0.0014285229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034386807,0.001036358,0.00017040069,0.00003155686,0.00001380991,9.943299e-7,0.0030893364,0.000028844883,0.00006362,0.95330536,0.04177048,0.00014539088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005832814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007583822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87932456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016413964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004324085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080724725","doi":"10.1017/s0034412520000323","title":"Mapping the epistemic arguments for religious toleration","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religious Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Epistemology; Conflation; Philosophy; Variety (cybernetics); Philosophy of religion; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.17772830582338434,"score_gpt":0.3097111834898216,"score_spread":0.13198287766643724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080724725","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3363548,0.20560288,0.0033527666,0.3536532,0.011048836,0.0059071006,0.0002423088,0.0014498364,0.08238828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796255,0.0072737182,0.00014925438,0.008593747,0.0021186466,0.0001820044,0.000016452268,0.000031944863,0.0020087382],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882585,0.00006897328,0.0003636259,0.0002859958,0.00016988494,0.00028566038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889,0.0003901847,0.00017197707,0.00019650592,0.00030542075,0.00004592665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027823966,0.00019333076,0.00034977563,0.000030147476,0.0008806251,0.00009759328,0.00018765495,0.000051950294,0.00000414127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002720516,0.00013118333,0.00017085354,0.00004389638,0.00039423007,0.00006903509,0.00007945858,0.00018067859,0.0000881253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042748627,0.00003041088,0.0001219248,0.00042304164,0.00055147667,0.0000048233364,0.521355,0.000034191347,0.0002265865,0.13077483,0.34525913,0.001175847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006452511,0.00028690303,0.000013371167,0.000107888605,0.0001342143,0.0000038860135,0.06673777,0.0002046597,0.00027224072,0.107038975,0.82422066,0.00033420406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006602677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018279234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64327073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004217107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032004184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6773145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081735501","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6205","title":"Other-Regarding Virtues and Their Place in Virtue Argumentation Theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Epistemology; Epistemic virtue; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Virtue ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059708128957152884,"score_gpt":0.2543450000964259,"score_spread":0.19463687113927303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081735501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7078478,0.0004821769,0.0010365421,0.0018147222,0.00039724723,0.00027269678,0.000039039587,0.00013007529,0.28797972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918713,0.000021564694,0.000048409616,0.007044131,0.00026271664,0.000009150302,0.000008862449,0.000008088388,0.00072575593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942654,0.00006394647,0.00019698207,0.00010748546,0.00006224208,0.00014280673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963063,0.00015833463,0.00007410529,0.000065598644,0.000027168087,0.00004419103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032086048,0.0001124707,0.00015622911,0.000040729345,0.00012702985,0.000086952125,0.00008508874,0.000052138894,0.00012979584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005595869,0.000081636696,0.00003984536,0.00002351282,0.00022881095,0.00042592976,0.00004215836,0.00019034586,0.00005317721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058099053,0.000010226596,0.0003793913,0.00003892269,0.000015017905,0.0000016022107,0.0746815,0.000041600957,0.00010409451,0.9210636,0.000059373546,0.0035465523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025301646,0.0009885819,0.0016044023,0.00011705565,0.000044405817,0.000009933409,0.15771486,0.0019708502,0.0023726516,0.4656108,0.36617038,0.0008659204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050271618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020839892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45545283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009544723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016161199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3329048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082735929","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6214","title":"What is Wrong with Deductivism?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Inference; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.09978874048651296,"score_gpt":0.2585445522149686,"score_spread":0.15875581172845563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082735929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25441223,0.000961835,0.00033642267,0.022047987,0.0020400246,0.00037964978,0.000026551754,0.00034529998,0.71945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96810544,0.000088127315,0.00015205359,0.025417907,0.0009182539,0.000009698743,0.000012685097,0.000012605388,0.005283241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932754,0.000015355801,0.00016137867,0.0001280327,0.00014318168,0.00022450577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958545,0.000034343255,0.000079297264,0.00012394352,0.00009146725,0.00008550663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008193116,0.00012795802,0.00016822998,0.000022530983,0.00019515303,0.00025084507,0.00014335444,0.000050810253,0.0008194539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011618011,0.0000884701,0.000059559658,0.000027936208,0.00038036559,0.0012913075,0.000042925072,0.00023890493,0.00048268776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070273556,0.000030160716,0.0002607108,0.00010444647,0.00006821787,0.000015278403,0.20369199,0.000028313165,0.000014003504,0.7852875,0.0043748566,0.0060542505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041312794,0.0006345473,0.00021610745,0.000034261302,0.000040708386,0.000009780356,0.034273006,0.00011725311,0.0003779077,0.0066861003,0.95688486,0.00031234356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035814064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000073187606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006527971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041926098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8972446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082914421","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6172","title":"Resolution of Deep Disagreement: Not Simply Consensus","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Reading (process); Resolution (logic); Common ground; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.11829525222959104,"score_gpt":0.26951155422027623,"score_spread":0.1512163019906852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082914421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24223492,0.0002608888,0.00067266973,0.0085552195,0.00096393516,0.00036609793,0.00015139177,0.00017064443,0.74662423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929302,0.000014802579,0.00014666434,0.0059088017,0.00034941366,0.0000037329926,0.000024102099,0.0000055445057,0.0006167906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921614,0.000029840667,0.0003228672,0.000092882154,0.00015062223,0.00018767247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946314,0.00008787271,0.0001554382,0.00011317571,0.00011770424,0.00006265786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015222124,0.00009805582,0.00018254585,0.000025681711,0.0001323748,0.000026530503,0.000121841316,0.000056171022,0.00041762597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010513552,0.00007993334,0.00008745296,0.000025132225,0.0004690165,0.00011675312,0.000054377957,0.00016065052,0.00016845384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010247539,0.000027563434,0.00018965105,0.00013629383,0.000036277237,0.000004568886,0.044457834,0.000139855,0.0001235878,0.9509829,0.0015734385,0.002225544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011394854,0.0010999419,0.0015253878,0.000027287067,0.000093260554,0.0000054855595,0.012941464,0.0035913088,0.0012670931,0.011998706,0.96589196,0.00041863145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011021248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002006128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9643185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000074283735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002568708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45727116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083188059","doi":"10.1007/s11229-020-02844-4","title":"Other minds are neither seen nor inferred","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Attribution; Slogan; Philosophy of science; Mental state; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of mind; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Psychology; State (computer science); Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.14870421228325698,"score_gpt":0.2656107985149932,"score_spread":0.11690658623173622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083188059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24474633,0.00043123114,0.00014054998,0.025495658,0.0011569703,0.00035904028,0.0002694864,0.00031981902,0.72708094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96744704,0.0000046583764,0.00005675454,0.006330199,0.0016417739,0.000015152202,0.0000041858025,0.000041586318,0.024458641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992114,0.000078354045,0.00016514155,0.0002078144,0.00012944009,0.00020788006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994005,0.00013594121,0.000091557864,0.00020883688,0.000068409885,0.0000947563],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012207075,0.00014326851,0.00022925925,0.000026734653,0.00012426237,0.00007604852,0.00017994453,0.000073046576,0.0031655284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014595884,0.000115294635,0.00011052304,0.0000256588,0.00028276697,0.00011216512,0.000040232953,0.00019688676,0.0011489164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017710026,0.00036088214,0.013952619,0.0004222915,0.0005467569,0.000064328444,0.3529923,0.0000144623,0.0015776594,0.54597586,0.07111771,0.012798015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017469905,0.00005088004,0.00043764414,0.000031482767,0.000035877412,6.690947e-7,0.006390589,0.000053731597,0.00044108144,0.0032961867,0.9888884,0.0001987815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020252433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070726086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9177707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000921423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002609439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084794170","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3650250","title":"Sustaining Rules: A Model and Application","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.032960499881262116,"score_gpt":0.2808363260069402,"score_spread":0.24787582612567807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084794170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78375536,0.005822799,0.055560347,0.008743239,0.0006396505,0.00036871148,0.0000135426735,0.000106220454,0.14499012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883817,0.0014287746,0.00006578142,0.00013178577,0.00072655536,0.000005588967,0.0000021723677,0.000014576877,0.0092430655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875927,0.000027241693,0.00014458229,0.0001281806,0.000102615944,0.0008381352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993947,0.000024839646,0.00021248288,0.00020903538,0.000112039554,0.00004689267],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010636287,0.00009290846,0.00012971058,0.000039322895,0.0016496555,0.00030787732,0.00022430549,0.00004773312,0.0000075333387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050396913,0.0000798465,0.00005333627,0.0000036403364,0.00033165005,0.00030820165,0.000038810103,0.001033746,0.000013682118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009494665,0.000013335447,0.00012849743,0.00000774433,0.00004216917,5.2726364e-7,0.0056636017,0.000012037609,0.000043565633,0.97943854,0.000032690226,0.014607769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002952255,0.00007074436,0.00006471597,0.000009812336,0.000035030935,0.000038018945,0.008848534,0.0022070077,0.0000069876387,0.97779816,0.010514924,0.0001108407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001398478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030709382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20462634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011794058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005592928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088844768","doi":"","title":"Solving the Contact Paradox: Rational Belief in the Teeth of the Evidence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5577524151402756,"score_gpt":0.5435108853321101,"score_spread":0.01424152980816551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088844768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8855133,0.04478132,0.00013973039,0.031110048,0.0018616389,0.0015142687,0.00008905472,0.000027012566,0.034963597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99110985,0.0029650815,0.000013720125,0.004993293,0.00059185893,0.00002815279,0.0000022125264,0.00001749133,0.000278361],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971695,0.00094284693,0.00072924915,0.00023544925,0.00069079996,0.0002321457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960442,0.0023648364,0.0008031047,0.0004235386,0.00030464915,0.00005963393],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026496502,0.00019471446,0.00046499807,0.00008656376,0.0006210171,0.0008678713,0.0033598247,0.000059512906,0.0028046723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092810614,0.00009738314,0.00023730173,0.00023773506,0.00062430784,0.0012698087,0.0004599753,0.00076987816,0.000008488096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045937687,0.00059521256,0.34728885,0.0005229824,0.0006059941,0.000031601514,0.18296938,0.00047726187,0.028092172,0.2974689,0.13446043,0.0070278496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009631149,0.000075120886,0.704159,0.0018843432,0.00032871135,0.000014728675,0.014438824,0.0004103451,0.007137773,0.09417885,0.17571656,0.0006926021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012488262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011282362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3568702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026012862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021472656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094278271","doi":"10.1093/analys/anaa035","title":"Moderate pragmatic invariantism and contextual implicature cancellation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Implicature; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Pragmatics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05170688961517459,"score_gpt":0.25555054870121413,"score_spread":0.20384365908603955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094278271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72867775,0.00443632,0.018795455,0.0686967,0.00046540637,0.0006933649,0.00032026306,0.0003429711,0.17757176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99506956,0.000064172964,0.00008298671,0.0028426624,0.00025952526,0.000005216676,0.000056674387,0.0000069880043,0.0016122274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994031,0.00006285504,0.00016099308,0.0001862702,0.00008234126,0.0001043946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995802,0.00007242363,0.00008904578,0.00011402042,0.000080014346,0.00006426312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001037053,0.00008718383,0.00026029925,0.00004937909,0.00018417147,0.00010930425,0.000058830534,0.00004814832,0.00027549866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003315494,0.000074338735,0.000094723735,0.000092926944,0.00013426822,0.00010882216,0.000020879224,0.00013453377,0.000025971753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027901466,0.000029112192,0.0013368495,0.000105585415,0.0022116918,0.000007321831,0.10976178,0.00040455282,0.000445727,0.8778657,0.005197217,0.0026066129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002659745,0.00045486473,0.009154894,0.00006580242,0.018108547,0.0000065051645,0.03003786,0.26173866,0.0008071063,0.116367355,0.5586103,0.0019883127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005282286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033337043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7614983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000056549034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017888611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30314457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094539809","doi":"10.1111/theo.12288","title":"False Beliefs and Misleading Evidence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Normative; Doxastic logic; Psychology; Epistemology; False accusation; Scientific evidence; Positive economics; Social psychology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.17747749986801842,"score_gpt":0.2908205842105531,"score_spread":0.1133430843425347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094539809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6467056,0.010051927,0.0005766825,0.037947234,0.0036972617,0.0005029693,0.00004492846,0.00051048165,0.2999629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923571,0.00012696233,0.00006813771,0.0025252022,0.0017226439,0.00000337659,0.000001394727,0.000011136495,0.0031840685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994584,0.00007273877,0.00011196849,0.00015277525,0.000074487536,0.00012967383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947083,0.00027005735,0.0000416826,0.000103332844,0.0000434586,0.00007061611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026501942,0.00008240257,0.00014048877,0.000013189271,0.00017776298,0.00007364718,0.00010009376,0.000032316053,0.00033263504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020634211,0.00006886473,0.000034666118,0.000015127993,0.000337041,0.0001487427,0.00004129606,0.00014667436,0.00018632972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015932375,0.0000054328116,0.00006334839,0.00005429419,0.000014798894,0.0000029245987,0.070149034,3.7641504e-7,0.0007034084,0.9260928,0.0017885262,0.0011091429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039038793,0.00027165073,0.00016890377,0.00017610188,0.000085292806,0.0000035594906,0.00876832,0.000085088985,0.001138156,0.45517412,0.53336644,0.0003719708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004174357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049741262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53157794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004531981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013965314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36421204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3103247259","doi":"","title":"The Therapeutic Value of Intellectual Virtue","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Red Deer Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Character (mathematics); Deception; Value (mathematics); Character traits; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4138537470222998,"score_gpt":0.5388305111534157,"score_spread":0.12497676413111591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3103247259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70644975,0.1284799,0.0004540102,0.0007348784,0.0061885207,0.0007494306,0.00006698891,0.00005845835,0.15681808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868023,0.00829191,0.000024457977,0.0005995798,0.000937163,0.000020185511,0.0000039292263,0.00004462909,0.0032758585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997463,0.00057973247,0.00080573995,0.00020489654,0.00051158643,0.00043506673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960407,0.002124683,0.00076796475,0.00049707794,0.0004113355,0.00015821603],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026360704,0.00026294866,0.0006313533,0.0002544894,0.0007025471,0.00075003767,0.002137911,0.00009916738,0.006770077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045341917,0.00017530573,0.00028787582,0.00017335423,0.0011163643,0.0014701968,0.000466512,0.00057994825,0.00004886663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045751335,0.0010703932,0.05885418,0.0003119274,0.0016687278,0.0000054110383,0.059196666,0.000040050465,0.022490464,0.7414688,0.07110947,0.043326426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062499935,0.000057103935,0.052058827,0.00038109164,0.0003933747,0.000013157747,0.0066442885,0.000056661,0.026310673,0.12446621,0.7882749,0.00071870175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063198636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018653454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7171654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003976993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011730309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107385141","doi":"10.1007/s10677-020-10142-8","title":"Thinking the Right Way (at the Right Time) about Virtues and Skills","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of medicine; Political philosophy; Ontology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Politics; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.030316566703023597,"score_gpt":0.28736537289053204,"score_spread":0.25704880618750847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107385141","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030729609,0.0057397727,0.00033991196,0.534867,0.000880991,0.00053599675,0.000047865502,0.00017440734,0.42668444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8111229,0.0007339018,0.000118693395,0.16533487,0.0017405922,0.000015694255,0.0000103839075,0.00003118442,0.020891808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961993,0.002641816,0.00025933268,0.00033446238,0.0003102171,0.00025487336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869108,0.01238294,0.00018871024,0.00026414916,0.0001305487,0.00012285494],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052774786,0.00021106903,0.00026497207,0.000013675256,0.0021831691,0.0004349944,0.0002949579,0.0002491323,0.0012737403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002852874,0.00010309373,0.00009056496,0.000035778394,0.002812005,0.00042175042,0.00027630816,0.0022181831,0.0002204682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021754907,0.000033970955,0.000004663119,0.00003024728,0.000093821385,0.000020434698,0.07598476,0.000001368787,0.00006469223,0.917525,0.004919443,0.0011040309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016263998,0.0000831848,0.00003414002,0.000019528632,0.00014365531,0.000016222717,0.0023529378,0.000019511775,0.00015998648,0.4298853,0.5669989,0.00012400105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033361186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053162763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78039324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009973978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030030435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112963609","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2020.4.8168","title":"Mansplaining and Illocutionary Force","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Focus (optics); Speech act; Linguistics; Psychology; Sociology; Communication; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.06789706391376149,"score_gpt":0.24350105982562917,"score_spread":0.17560399591186768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112963609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07049529,0.000757927,0.00018769332,0.027471386,0.0010872856,0.00032685927,0.00021146587,0.00036636292,0.8990957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890099,0.000008681268,0.000147395,0.0069123586,0.0027317146,0.00001577087,0.00003919685,0.000027510185,0.0011074281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894655,0.000055109107,0.00026985485,0.00033444658,0.00016292339,0.00023109416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993881,0.00011392132,0.000102458245,0.00017021259,0.000060887964,0.0001643941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011393781,0.00019331388,0.00025289124,0.000037403188,0.00043555684,0.00011596532,0.00015652631,0.000076354845,0.00017988223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014476596,0.00018691244,0.00009390159,0.000030031379,0.000656359,0.00018303258,0.000020956208,0.00027240044,0.00017783251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037226375,0.00002762147,0.00012087445,0.0001439063,0.000040637653,0.00002483893,0.12554295,2.606485e-7,0.000054907072,0.8716238,0.0011541188,0.0012288085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011371017,0.002851661,0.00018992393,0.00013636834,0.00013413215,0.000031647618,0.024987435,0.00025150017,0.000055280903,0.5312721,0.4381427,0.0008101452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001533388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011551371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91851467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009241139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026719508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7622068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116995137","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i4.6070","title":"Putting Reasons in their Place","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Reflection (computer programming); Cognition; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.11057870179605298,"score_gpt":0.2589531819822904,"score_spread":0.14837448018623742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116995137","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19518138,0.00024463763,0.00008380756,0.0068125175,0.0004544493,0.00016913797,0.000029106266,0.0001661674,0.7968588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990672,0.000019613823,0.00019197921,0.0072719934,0.0005048447,0.0000071509,0.0000130024255,0.0000074165973,0.0013120029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936366,0.000031044543,0.00020694562,0.000099915145,0.00007595339,0.00022245324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996309,0.000109893364,0.000070525624,0.000089502326,0.000041299703,0.000057842168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021865992,0.000100538535,0.00015590798,0.000029271912,0.00012278302,0.00006229736,0.00014405159,0.000056575303,0.0002693084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000119451935,0.00007682876,0.000059299102,0.0000331767,0.0001612815,0.00026922283,0.000057256657,0.00029496703,0.00022487038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019924493,0.0000189099,0.00094219635,0.000058471927,0.000012277419,0.000010831315,0.106342025,0.000082049584,0.000016581953,0.8854096,0.0011850126,0.005902098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000527912,0.00019964551,0.0008860917,0.00004742399,0.000010736106,0.000005278784,0.014876524,0.0009507099,0.0001361931,0.022812683,0.95927274,0.00027407968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009396079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039772884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9580877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008889495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034025074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31329855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120664428","doi":"10.3917/rphi.211.0033","title":"Common Sense in Reid’s Response to Scepticism","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue philosophique de la France et de l étranger","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05124387955630529,"score_gpt":0.331619542929662,"score_spread":0.28037566337335673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120664428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56383115,0.02181676,0.0002519483,0.30084965,0.0018312836,0.00048692044,0.00028883532,0.00010018493,0.11054325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91029733,0.004190442,0.0018231088,0.043163124,0.0041471147,0.00011299916,0.000028070177,0.00014624356,0.036091585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993058,0.0045548873,0.0006575426,0.0006497463,0.00022888162,0.0008508962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99584746,0.002646715,0.00015698014,0.00076177274,0.00027799164,0.00030907255],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038156006,0.00043627457,0.00080583873,0.00021162107,0.00024179035,0.0002207436,0.00025920253,0.0006754727,0.0003237056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083540427,0.0005440296,0.0003087811,0.00023599817,0.00083807006,0.00024708925,0.000086895634,0.0019326075,0.00025830348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005769769,0.0005773182,0.0010169458,0.0010664647,0.00009788796,0.005416808,0.06446086,0.00050628046,0.007335859,0.9154135,0.0025816879,0.0009494364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095366,0.0001691872,0.007785605,0.0018957934,0.00010492407,0.00053522177,0.00050048984,0.00008442254,0.0013880322,0.252402,0.733516,0.00066469744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074022997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020313337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73093426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030734413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048151088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121936961","doi":"","title":"Investigating the Shared Background Required for Argument: A Critique of Fogelin's Thesis on Deep Disagreement","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.0819047116214753,"score_gpt":0.29310964403998846,"score_spread":0.21120493241851315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121936961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95656186,0.0061209863,0.0070100864,0.013747237,0.0011468554,0.0010993206,0.00006726145,0.000067297406,0.014179093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933854,0.0012011665,0.00015586037,0.00096540275,0.0010760052,0.00004079492,0.0000103627335,0.00003013638,0.0031349184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777234,0.0001866478,0.00045600565,0.0001828989,0.00028282017,0.0011193162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986959,0.0004485957,0.00033867368,0.00021880606,0.00023873059,0.000059308957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001774395,0.00018004695,0.00027308275,0.000061186525,0.0010262819,0.00006847706,0.00032514604,0.000063572115,0.0000641661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017594351,0.000121021956,0.00025700673,0.000035212655,0.0005382206,0.00018505832,0.000026325799,0.0009530949,0.000007491693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046012578,0.00010620765,0.00008859338,0.000036903577,0.00026581885,0.0000010651773,0.022641443,0.000014008311,0.00031120598,0.97405094,0.0004621643,0.0019756565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011076953,0.001216768,0.00009998162,0.00012395885,0.00014922959,0.00007930624,0.034252573,0.00020671297,0.0005273689,0.9331851,0.028781042,0.00027028276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001305914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027321046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04086584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024347052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067705574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78934336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124226346","doi":"10.1017/9781316827413.014","title":"Experimental Epistemology and “Gettier” Cases","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07021174378295578,"score_gpt":0.23436535633234665,"score_spread":0.16415361254939087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124226346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025256497,0.001149403,0.0000070488886,0.000027262635,0.0010625336,0.00027474048,0.0004231727,0.000114584924,0.9944156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009789692,0.000045770357,0.000026368256,0.0002106407,0.0009923364,9.082158e-7,0.00006605244,0.00005125534,0.988817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876386,0.00007601586,0.00019753278,0.0005056414,0.00017944443,0.00027749166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988073,0.0001282751,0.00022026627,0.00039299848,0.00026852626,0.00018263682],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013360003,0.00038676642,0.0005244948,0.00013288425,0.0004185434,0.00007289673,0.0002717271,0.0003599533,0.00007567022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011782767,0.00043090616,0.00016178838,0.0000015339102,0.003000037,0.00009796217,0.00032555495,0.0004214716,0.00004480587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007673066,0.000013143715,5.0975945e-7,0.00007587192,0.00014863472,0.00043821294,0.0034353908,2.470929e-8,0.000014488673,0.90011466,0.095570385,0.00011194916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046139566,0.00028355056,6.123276e-7,0.000077777324,0.00020983415,0.00008666284,0.001848464,0.0000026512307,0.00023908613,0.00024060652,0.99610114,0.00044824355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041668784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004929828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90053076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118454554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000106545805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124357432","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/m5yw4","title":"Is Probabilistic Evidence a Source of Knowledge","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Probabilistic logic; Denial; Psychology; Perception; Social psychology; Trustworthiness; Population; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Sociology","score_opus":0.2398368034321854,"score_gpt":0.31552042742824693,"score_spread":0.07568362399606152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124357432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12171322,0.0034415566,0.0018969163,0.019638885,0.00078285625,0.00056809915,0.000021415528,0.0002866178,0.8516504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683435,0.000020898466,0.00010461817,0.0020939237,0.0004372609,0.0000060769667,8.5987676e-7,0.000009800584,0.02898304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939346,0.00005194075,0.00019392527,0.00015945168,0.000087179375,0.00011403912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929386,0.00026170415,0.00006395313,0.00013995505,0.00018099647,0.000059518206],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014193352,0.00008150133,0.00018462841,0.000016068736,0.000076795586,0.000023236065,0.00014826865,0.000033321645,0.0016114411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026191285,0.000063915184,0.0000859622,0.00002850543,0.00042968465,0.00009516783,0.00004845955,0.00011806496,0.00028452717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016045165,0.00006906539,0.0002555157,0.0006083138,0.000033405267,6.7416653e-7,0.23196389,0.0000031682464,0.00023164846,0.74552953,0.019820992,0.001467741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025824172,0.000418326,0.00012552415,0.00018181496,0.000101377605,9.3738123e-7,0.008303505,0.0010949404,0.001804715,0.0206182,0.9668133,0.00027906348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013617583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024797107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94699234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005997412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005633469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125584685","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4544","title":"On There Being Wide Reflective Equilibria: Why it is Important to Put it in the Plural","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Coherentism; Normative; Generality; Epistemology; Morality; Sociology; Political philosophy; Politics; Liberalism; Reflective equilibrium; Philosophy; Law; Foundationalism; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.11873980687484718,"score_gpt":0.3390400621543505,"score_spread":0.2203002552795033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125584685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5480392,0.00010990819,0.000047185087,0.026301306,0.00067057787,0.0006757937,0.000034469307,0.000037705835,0.42408386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9405335,0.00003443263,0.0000897575,0.053172134,0.0007379725,0.00004219003,0.0000038910543,0.000034446206,0.0053516743],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827117,0.0001406086,0.0004582216,0.00035137762,0.00040768198,0.00037096874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983931,0.00072412344,0.00016898694,0.00043936764,0.0001870815,0.000087338354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005147251,0.00021828034,0.00035169968,0.0001651807,0.000259928,0.00012620597,0.00073643756,0.00009237779,0.00042934399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036826447,0.00016250391,0.00011234991,0.00013482405,0.0002598533,0.0003491551,0.00014513044,0.00041533393,0.000113141235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005921531,0.00039851727,0.0020738472,0.0003440335,0.00018684831,0.00019060944,0.474989,0.00016259326,0.00089356484,0.24355026,0.27631605,0.00030251042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023917425,0.0026440513,0.01723716,0.0013358317,0.0008998599,0.0000348928,0.06100668,0.00021440384,0.0058372207,0.08032252,0.8261993,0.0018763375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009212512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002572414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54988325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004878155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009969817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66267174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125589595","doi":"","title":"Abduction and Inference to the Best Explanation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Epistemology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11107736316115657,"score_gpt":0.3001762207104441,"score_spread":0.1890988575492875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125589595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39704198,0.00051186315,0.0025761065,0.039359618,0.0024808785,0.00018426024,0.000014034304,0.00007220904,0.55775905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612088,0.00006770744,0.00010916703,0.0017115682,0.00050132675,0.000006926562,0.0000075925163,0.0000029792047,0.03638389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972093,0.000029648554,0.00006029684,0.00008150384,0.00005307989,0.000054520016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970347,0.00006565748,0.0000141627415,0.00008429078,0.00011423694,0.00001818834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000971031,0.0000352563,0.0000444546,0.000013015039,0.00018386614,0.00008432428,0.000028670504,0.000016099712,0.00029151453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056754234,0.000023069788,0.000012050681,0.000014334918,0.00006831054,0.00008003285,0.00001857264,0.00006006741,0.00009154081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010726144,0.000012814056,0.00010007128,0.0000067303986,0.0000064142537,6.1382906e-7,0.017530398,0.000002738026,0.00009776266,0.97471523,0.0023362045,0.005189932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069575966,0.000040784267,0.00039953232,0.000010312387,0.000016693011,0.0000035063197,0.030211952,0.00003578042,0.00092079863,0.023240102,0.9449699,0.00008108551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022158645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007433884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95147514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000040870905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016212407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41482818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127872091","doi":"10.1017/9781108379755.004","title":"The Psychological Dimension of the Lottery Paradox","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Epistemology; Odds; Skepticism; Realm; Rationality; Ticket; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.06776773083546732,"score_gpt":0.2308368106266343,"score_spread":0.16306907979116697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127872091","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018842652,0.0005356001,0.0000072932335,0.00017821415,0.0015068826,0.00023664022,0.00013014507,0.000034596065,0.9954864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013049796,0.00023903268,0.0000054617126,0.00028667095,0.0003285032,4.8233085e-7,0.000014259809,0.000022299564,0.98605347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889034,0.00013759105,0.00021142262,0.0003195251,0.00024386785,0.00019722966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983642,0.00027409848,0.00030666668,0.00075606897,0.00024817247,0.00005079112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016967465,0.00024019055,0.00034564344,0.000030430121,0.0006944893,0.000053250445,0.0005843344,0.00025713883,0.00001928867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016379874,0.0001542157,0.00040903763,0.000002812976,0.0021101995,0.00003434263,0.00037487535,0.00070886477,0.000007959128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003846987,0.000013756173,0.0000012079984,0.000039970513,0.00011596054,0.00003627537,0.00057438796,2.7703516e-7,0.000019489033,0.96605855,0.032542363,0.0005592612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019971424,0.000043053973,0.000022140712,0.00013361688,0.00019352422,0.000006478162,0.00036238763,0.0000024651974,0.00010872189,0.00037664114,0.99836564,0.00018562641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000075411364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040377527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9658233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003783067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77751184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128175181","doi":"10.5840/cpsem20194","title":"Conceiving the Inconceivability of Conceivability","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Semiotics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.07010020022249425,"score_gpt":0.261892786582268,"score_spread":0.19179258635977375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128175181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021206501,0.0009111576,0.000020542788,0.000773985,0.002888142,0.00062293967,0.00035979023,0.00006306284,0.9922397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38839462,0.00016645662,0.000050198432,0.00080290315,0.0013062785,0.000002759435,0.00005021315,0.00006984362,0.6091567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979175,0.00012939695,0.0008086842,0.00045129703,0.00040055733,0.00029256346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953944,0.0019034495,0.00072555494,0.0012985636,0.0006158574,0.000062140796],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001098209,0.00040408684,0.0009664406,0.00004109873,0.00023286295,0.000057274952,0.00061133405,0.0004129209,0.0014916607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003152834,0.00028879254,0.00044310943,0.000010507066,0.004997131,0.00008733883,0.00019201217,0.0011389868,0.00016981814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011149358,0.000022321652,0.0001975576,0.00048785986,0.00014292145,0.0000012645794,0.0121148955,0.000009600004,0.000009286572,0.98366326,0.0027614196,0.0005784561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001870321,0.000114345705,0.000079018035,0.00027188298,0.00022378219,0.0000016690896,0.0011392038,0.000030640665,0.000066166016,0.25123066,0.7462799,0.00037569378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001381115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006166778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7435185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093350456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040203918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129561315","doi":"10.1515/krt-2019-330305","title":"Letting the Truth Out: Children, Naive Truth, and Deflationism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Falsity; Epistemology; Pragmatic theory of truth; Philosophy; Focus (optics); Norm (philosophy); Representation (politics); Reading (process); Coherence theory of truth; Linguistics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0385749328108841,"score_gpt":0.2490922352097897,"score_spread":0.2105173023989056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129561315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94964486,0.0015999662,0.000059973765,0.007102048,0.0045376807,0.00017121804,0.000020422714,0.000028164546,0.03683568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954032,0.00009315684,0.000098550656,0.0007888622,0.003361658,0.0000010082287,0.000002160948,0.00002750868,0.00022391214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891496,0.00013334646,0.00042755736,0.00013263787,0.00023608224,0.00015538945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867684,0.00039283172,0.0004929607,0.00016003505,0.00021588993,0.000061446946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005706019,0.00014336545,0.0002776893,0.00008961458,0.00034162836,0.00018892997,0.00017887869,0.00006113323,0.00014571096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010270557,0.00009437189,0.0001643732,0.000021405296,0.00032218266,0.00040615036,0.000037888247,0.00044608043,0.000039809827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060096958,0.000060813207,0.0031156589,0.000047835376,0.00018608647,0.000007952543,0.038581517,0.000007017102,0.00031019395,0.9534293,0.00025504996,0.003938518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032004232,0.0011377478,0.014676696,0.00056229037,0.00033921452,0.0004007471,0.0033818642,0.000071736664,0.00047400527,0.89793706,0.077142216,0.0006760098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008455828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000079724905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07688716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018410647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028098642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38483742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131748492","doi":"10.1007/s43545-021-00070-4","title":"On moral equivalence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SN Social Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Deliberation; Epistemology; Logical equivalence; Social psychology; Politics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Political science; Pure mathematics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.2608433413644697,"score_gpt":0.3608877721005691,"score_spread":0.10004443073609942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131748492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15537816,0.00015595042,0.000009693244,0.0043944516,0.0016402421,0.00003289295,0.000011939233,0.00004167672,0.838335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842563,0.000008629158,0.000059260045,0.0015962168,0.0011269144,0.000002882971,0.0000018680287,0.000003152585,0.012944739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918795,0.000074439864,0.00008939061,0.0001852804,0.0002568284,0.00020614178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996855,0.00010496163,0.00004302234,0.000057627505,0.0000852979,0.000023593842],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003371206,0.00006146598,0.000102081955,0.000020218751,0.0011519314,0.00016245159,0.00016660479,0.000032915865,0.0009177223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007892179,0.00005025117,0.00006826105,0.000071136805,0.0018023455,0.00013667069,0.000036833106,0.00011156068,0.00012940545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010894248,0.0000238021,0.000090707596,0.000005396654,0.000003479922,0.0000037983218,0.017745622,8.568574e-7,0.00006265882,0.977004,0.0034124067,0.0016462187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010947618,0.00010930215,0.00047635305,0.000017323084,0.0000122090305,8.7947444e-7,0.0126173915,0.000011488202,0.00050000445,0.8332148,0.15274985,0.00018090339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000111289155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008607413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82887816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012633231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001253344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131993214","doi":"10.1002/tht3.473","title":"Surprise, surprise: KK is innocent","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Surprise; Analogy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Blame; Counterintuitive; Wright; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science; History; Social psychology; Art history","score_opus":0.08003400529711314,"score_gpt":0.2827868260427748,"score_spread":0.20275282074566164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131993214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124980345,0.02629088,0.00044626548,0.0543404,0.011749681,0.0002627379,0.00016880999,0.00009952556,0.78166133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96969754,0.0010160416,0.0007080946,0.0055589746,0.010360837,0.0000021767648,0.000010031257,0.00005431532,0.012591979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980632,0.00023098435,0.0007308453,0.00019914295,0.0004824986,0.0002933328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975014,0.00018773584,0.00055311836,0.00032960475,0.001265402,0.00016274399],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000673143,0.0002218122,0.0005555402,0.00014801373,0.00025304497,0.00013964725,0.00031396374,0.00010490976,0.0015884056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000130766,0.00018573915,0.0004255407,0.00011777472,0.0003774916,0.00035647536,0.00005984399,0.000692786,0.00012437871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012160559,0.000513439,0.00043759024,0.00019575514,0.0005035948,0.00061461737,0.03443319,0.000004544615,0.0005427759,0.9099844,0.04908179,0.0035666917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007428456,0.00016971031,0.00008747213,0.00014811616,0.00015144021,0.00011807649,0.001006415,0.0000033551535,0.0029324535,0.32057604,0.6738146,0.0002494572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010590219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031551353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8447172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004651867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027725528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134221673","doi":"10.1007/s10781-021-09461-6","title":"Gaṅgeśa on Epistemic Luck","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Indian Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Localism; Luck; Epistemology; Event (particle physics); Philosophy of religion; Judgement; Hindsight bias; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06350312864739766,"score_gpt":0.266998458694861,"score_spread":0.20349533004746334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134221673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2643946,0.0024328406,0.000012853132,0.04496489,0.006718759,0.0001226916,0.000050259856,0.000036194022,0.6812669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865535,0.00012877506,0.00009716361,0.004136055,0.0058948174,0.0000010856008,0.0000052079827,0.000024655725,0.003158738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986851,0.00014095077,0.0005109408,0.0001384408,0.00032068693,0.0002038416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853,0.00017732794,0.00044832457,0.00023120284,0.0004740168,0.0001391766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003676889,0.00015269694,0.00036374456,0.00016386512,0.00020512249,0.00009939026,0.00021515285,0.00009197893,0.00056876783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013432412,0.00012659113,0.0003171066,0.000050899962,0.0002682794,0.00019811116,0.000019011453,0.0006713139,0.00019688153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006059537,0.00027309387,0.00018582666,0.00014736642,0.00020763562,0.0010473148,0.020317312,0.000011945056,0.00028659613,0.9683783,0.007648379,0.0014356191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087529933,0.0005731283,0.00017178708,0.00044030702,0.00007335995,0.00040231456,0.0015931425,0.0000012329629,0.0024983315,0.7911476,0.20194712,0.0002763941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005187595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029730749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7221589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050345247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019821196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6227609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134735527","doi":"10.1111/theo.12310","title":"Should Acknowledgments in Published Academic Articles Include Gratitude for Reviewers Who Reviewed for Journals that Rejected Those Articles?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universitetet i Oslo; Ryerson University","keywords":"Gratitude; Argument (complex analysis); Publishing; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2973672460105159,"score_gpt":0.4024448103015438,"score_spread":0.10507756429102788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134735527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7408843,0.16203937,0.0044919983,0.037990406,0.014914497,0.00904258,0.00059756014,0.00052777404,0.029511504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94119656,0.019925253,0.0026191776,0.009117153,0.0047251233,0.001203652,0.00016533228,0.00017379015,0.020873966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739254,0.00052623334,0.000828825,0.00043184136,0.000274592,0.0005459744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727935,0.00092699943,0.00036033036,0.00048368645,0.0008151594,0.00013449627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003992061,0.00026921823,0.0007611368,0.00012883084,0.00036661682,0.00029912477,0.0003730928,0.00019198551,0.00059338164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00406699,0.00021937833,0.0003063132,0.0001727564,0.00023724647,0.00065231824,0.00010744413,0.00056387874,0.000038374135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020996432,0.00022693172,0.00082410866,0.0010424537,0.00018113524,0.000006279783,0.028498154,0.0000024478104,0.0040247636,0.9125269,0.040855464,0.011601363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019526941,0.00011698703,0.0003543706,0.0016471564,0.00024239479,0.0000036417962,0.0038228133,0.00009113248,0.007975876,0.6075598,0.37581402,0.00041910054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000178732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001052257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33495855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008009846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015732949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89459884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137284872","doi":"10.1007/s11229-020-03007-1","title":"Pathways of influence: understanding the impact of philosophy of science in scientific domains","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Metaphysics; Face (sociological concept); Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Work (physics); Philosophy of computer science; Science education; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Western philosophy; Social science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.12849002577294788,"score_gpt":0.31074139899676945,"score_spread":0.18225137322382157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137284872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96552706,0.0001686573,0.000019946949,0.000101839134,0.00025201964,0.00007451577,0.00005696776,0.0000046895734,0.03379428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99979633,0.000012024693,0.00002237598,0.000010731979,0.000037463717,0.0000018078299,0.0000010663548,0.000005248104,0.000112928145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898505,0.00009519605,0.00028960052,0.00016379288,0.00029430375,0.00017205329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874383,0.00037275162,0.00019306381,0.00035964602,0.0003029376,0.000027782915],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013131038,0.00007585715,0.00022257653,0.00017131619,0.0002181425,0.000039915365,0.00028547208,0.000029575875,0.000094372335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048899796,0.000049279355,0.00012397121,0.0002898755,0.007954264,0.00018641993,0.00007557546,0.00012359611,0.0000018510042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010136705,0.00010935167,0.0019998734,0.00009628391,0.000018781275,0.000002559585,0.06893914,0.00012580043,0.0574246,0.87119424,0.000011226778,0.000067984285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031781383,0.00015224956,0.0058744466,0.0005236329,0.00003345857,0.000003215487,0.068186045,0.0001417068,0.060947727,0.86349213,0.00015179199,0.00017580457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027366806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032852485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03426927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006156836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004959572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142413089","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3652620","title":"Experimental Evidence that Knowledge Entails Justification","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1677429648881246,"score_gpt":0.32351638326987187,"score_spread":0.15577341838174727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142413089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70869285,0.16249494,0.011657987,0.03274599,0.005600541,0.0008377684,0.0000164022,0.00040630883,0.07754719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903709,0.0016101971,0.000016405284,0.0005814675,0.0021858101,0.000007704549,0.0000038506464,0.000020713995,0.0052029206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982344,0.00014467331,0.00022982848,0.00020687046,0.00018807055,0.0009961732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936205,0.000092154245,0.00020583424,0.00012139061,0.00010945759,0.00010913248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007752626,0.0001459625,0.00017685728,0.00004075882,0.00046086422,0.00015000775,0.00028607962,0.00005384338,0.00031021403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009018997,0.00012719502,0.0001358462,0.00003414264,0.000221196,0.00044540685,0.000034778386,0.0013742797,0.00032257065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004505515,0.000084093306,0.000110853834,0.000020560408,0.000084241794,0.000001768057,0.04642437,0.0000016600331,0.0036225417,0.9433155,0.0012517673,0.0050375815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001667716,0.0023909016,0.00015005532,0.0002288729,0.00033128637,0.00022584351,0.29889044,0.0002593968,0.029303627,0.21217059,0.45327514,0.0011061529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035724377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039463898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7311449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031278774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078434136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5970638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3144906648","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/mp5na","title":"Epistemic Contextualism: An Idle Hypothesis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Contextualism; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Test (biology); Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.24907631227824356,"score_gpt":0.27443819424763527,"score_spread":0.02536188196939171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3144906648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1428393,0.00030788287,0.00029846973,0.02428796,0.00087345944,0.00024873015,0.00006375638,0.0004831205,0.83059734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96077263,0.000017307799,0.00020411015,0.016441906,0.0013471587,0.000008573669,0.000011089331,0.00002403263,0.021173183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991226,0.000101439,0.0002188191,0.00023702743,0.00012296751,0.00019712147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993277,0.00016562828,0.000063596446,0.00019859015,0.000096395255,0.0001480822],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015351342,0.00013172242,0.00023928165,0.000021914722,0.00020388381,0.00010436939,0.0001993666,0.00005931386,0.0030991978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008599965,0.00010776692,0.000096977004,0.000019725887,0.00035622562,0.00022095568,0.000028457356,0.00016683103,0.00079880067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014723094,0.000042621596,0.000044112257,0.000038297378,0.000032621243,0.0000052105192,0.05434348,8.1491606e-7,0.00039148857,0.93057084,0.012117017,0.0023987833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050425174,0.00034664985,0.00007443353,0.000014188152,0.000063934924,0.000003445971,0.032821488,0.00019464237,0.0012234664,0.050145954,0.9141947,0.00041285442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030432284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009071091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9020777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009078323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030265772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146535767","doi":"","title":"It's What's on the Inside that Counts … or is it? Virtue and the Psychological Criteria of Modesty","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Extant taxon; Epistemology; Psychology; State (computer science); Mental state; Folk psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13026000781159647,"score_gpt":0.35186920592041354,"score_spread":0.22160919810881707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146535767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6004897,0.004927412,0.00016201286,0.15745835,0.0028653154,0.00040687845,0.000019438627,0.000021896882,0.23364905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97714084,0.0099798385,0.0000034225475,0.005558453,0.0004981089,0.000003594623,4.305556e-7,0.000009285421,0.0068060155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998938,0.00016605761,0.00016093736,0.00011497514,0.00016426979,0.00045572178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913806,0.00022872094,0.00022164627,0.00031119827,0.00007525406,0.000025148409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001739842,0.00010631097,0.0001839489,0.000018955123,0.0008796158,0.00044814954,0.00036779852,0.000062054336,0.00044401392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010987946,0.000045639237,0.000089464214,0.000006527054,0.0010966059,0.0002676633,0.00003754487,0.0011282198,0.000028126027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017707905,0.00003570904,0.000020515741,0.000004466369,0.00008662032,0.0000016251515,0.005807422,1.498588e-7,0.000009072238,0.9856474,0.0039530685,0.0042568925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009393878,0.00042126927,0.00020417139,0.0000806475,0.00006784592,0.000105575324,0.018290356,0.000059909857,0.00004641661,0.8989045,0.08075034,0.00012955524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043468128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011148107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3766512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003365876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016515299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6765382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147097235","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/mfhez","title":"Knowledge and the Norm of Assertion: A Simple Test","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Simple (philosophy); Observational study; Test (biology); Epistemology; Body of knowledge; Computer science; Mathematics; Knowledge management; Statistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.087830275459607,"score_gpt":0.27611174403941074,"score_spread":0.18828146857980374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147097235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07463594,0.0009833177,0.00009329192,0.0182655,0.00021324043,0.00019077674,0.000016977534,0.000059658974,0.9055413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99171793,0.000029541325,0.000020189429,0.0013915534,0.0003757938,0.0000040491127,0.0000025014456,0.000004639853,0.0064538224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996619,0.000033355394,0.000120571436,0.00007603267,0.000043682154,0.0000644319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993732,0.00039735693,0.00003875776,0.00007784852,0.00008433068,0.000028506698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014625964,0.000051231047,0.00013039718,0.0000073943256,0.000118258205,0.00002596473,0.000066462795,0.00002032271,0.0003896619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010994368,0.00002879207,0.000043104923,0.000015780788,0.0005376647,0.000050827395,0.00003394072,0.000084691485,0.000034436696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001590919,0.00002708532,0.00037918473,0.000052409752,0.000015996828,2.048498e-7,0.040214803,1.2829422e-7,0.000057572528,0.9540958,0.004564192,0.0005767298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001161866,0.0002938281,0.0006010333,0.0000096101585,0.000066649336,0.000001096371,0.009007513,0.0006603294,0.0006374994,0.042201944,0.9452294,0.00012924476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016046283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012446373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9406652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000016477085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001845108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42665246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152037860","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3650207","title":"A New Paradigm for Epistemology: From Reliabilism to Abilism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029127228766303522,"score_gpt":0.2616167939952068,"score_spread":0.2324895652289033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152037860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45687962,0.010671845,0.24065506,0.2523795,0.014179557,0.0023475124,0.00029528348,0.00045011353,0.022141507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8879658,0.001084117,0.001128968,0.0024753928,0.009578047,0.00005572236,0.000011023567,0.00009678652,0.09760414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968301,0.00013689454,0.00045500844,0.00036883645,0.00019219353,0.0020169895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984212,0.00064781815,0.00020156898,0.00034262362,0.0001580887,0.00022870574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014710333,0.00023906278,0.00039565476,0.000105460975,0.0004312782,0.00009586129,0.00043082866,0.00014203828,0.00032271474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028547086,0.00015836889,0.00028966242,0.000032796623,0.00021678333,0.00023676766,0.000038825518,0.00088099774,0.0002364858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011033697,0.000034559216,0.000090196336,0.0000055514574,0.0001599239,0.0000015767492,0.004903662,9.781564e-7,0.00031999545,0.96121794,0.007126883,0.02602839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007563942,0.00042581148,0.000040697814,0.000030148401,0.000052716237,0.000027875716,0.00094450795,0.0000010743494,0.00006904802,0.65288484,0.34459192,0.00017498982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070783874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010514681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43108618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005114402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017842829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6458096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153240413","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/c5rpn","title":"Knowledge and Assertion in Korean","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Psychology; Cognition; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1166346675663665,"score_gpt":0.2875049584554771,"score_spread":0.17087029088911057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153240413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3261054,0.0003571045,0.000043838154,0.004325893,0.00019832098,0.00007077242,0.000002119423,0.00005628074,0.6688403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933893,0.000025944533,0.000035171885,0.0011284874,0.000292768,0.0000023175037,0.000003452472,0.0000048160787,0.0051177153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996937,0.000029279978,0.00008460299,0.0000937957,0.000026929942,0.0000717189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998474,0.00003874658,0.000014073698,0.00003909759,0.000025376346,0.000035283654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008263668,0.000045896377,0.00008281763,0.000017799763,0.000048086134,0.000029111605,0.000031460462,0.00002497323,0.00022531305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002182037,0.00003748034,0.000016542614,0.000013247071,0.00010026715,0.00008056623,0.000016948215,0.000093365816,0.00007273971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052262235,0.000026085085,0.0013396753,0.000038586648,0.0000051288207,0.0000013465551,0.062785804,1.9483993e-7,0.00012367888,0.9306858,0.0026455848,0.0023428502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082899444,0.0002483684,0.0057609426,0.00003104578,0.00002485718,0.0000011611645,0.01630222,0.0010702914,0.0010788821,0.042873766,0.9314564,0.00032310016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012551133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036996931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9288108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000038782637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010492016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24670199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154949570","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3643897","title":"Reasons, Answers, and Goals","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Data science","score_opus":0.02848750294398813,"score_gpt":0.2554422374152888,"score_spread":0.22695473447130068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154949570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78615975,0.08793055,0.00065751496,0.0056171017,0.0030380504,0.00022365936,0.00001549453,0.000114157985,0.1162437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745228,0.005718619,0.000033393273,0.00038546423,0.0025335108,0.000002182029,0.0000028385205,0.000019057585,0.01678211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978328,0.000111462316,0.00017564475,0.00009939242,0.00013604775,0.0016446783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995312,0.000069140486,0.0001080534,0.00010869261,0.00006771722,0.00011517611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017966469,0.00012250773,0.00017061921,0.000055753157,0.000440882,0.0000877729,0.000111236346,0.000060586437,0.00012296603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048819424,0.00009894217,0.00007744904,0.000017803593,0.00024049223,0.00036530464,0.000021498749,0.0013520322,0.000054961336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010293532,0.00003857966,0.0025755027,0.0000066578036,0.000093380935,6.063147e-7,0.006501352,8.347438e-8,0.00002960235,0.9838451,0.0009468613,0.0059519545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000432049,0.0002101338,0.00060726685,0.00002034598,0.00009889804,0.000337015,0.021284824,0.0000020128005,0.0000331844,0.4640886,0.5126408,0.00024489607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000101433216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013499554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51975656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012781864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033954837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58739823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156898609","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/kjy7r","title":"Belief Through Thick and Thin","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Logical consequence; Psychology; Experimental philosophy; Philosophy; Social psychology; Philosophical methodology","score_opus":0.1283903247322142,"score_gpt":0.2712959703647008,"score_spread":0.14290564563248662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156898609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020462198,0.0006592417,0.00020871894,0.030889856,0.00039391487,0.00009750796,0.000010608728,0.0001585662,0.9471194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92742795,0.00025141664,0.0007399993,0.043768696,0.0015034499,0.000004755079,0.0000079760475,0.000018889452,0.026276894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994879,0.00003418994,0.00011623801,0.00015665327,0.00008462436,0.00012039789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970263,0.000079939586,0.000030239387,0.00008858404,0.000047851547,0.000050764324],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000090508605,0.000084194,0.0001373384,0.00000717743,0.00019181777,0.000076113385,0.00007533778,0.000046329507,0.0010604553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037772657,0.0000634509,0.00003918971,0.00001228415,0.0003386175,0.00020204841,0.000044307657,0.00019253322,0.00019244815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037180635,0.000011213799,0.000051563722,0.00003218368,0.000016638121,0.000001840448,0.100424245,4.0875878e-7,0.000022448874,0.885031,0.014181525,0.00022323635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017485222,0.000096017335,0.00005034465,0.000005902326,0.000018996796,9.61617e-7,0.008441804,0.000060476556,0.00017111003,0.06800012,0.92286026,0.00011915225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025392786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051787676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92084247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000025103311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015815029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W315888995","doi":"","title":"Receptivity as a virtue of (Practitioners of) argumentation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Receptivity; Argumentation theory; Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.0388025871809708,"score_gpt":0.24143473429023676,"score_spread":0.20263214710926597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W315888995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9555706,0.000052357747,0.000041290285,0.00077090313,0.00027674946,0.00025472898,0.00006618516,0.00002767181,0.04293953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908742,0.00003380444,0.000450529,0.00010074465,0.000069768874,8.186725e-7,0.000046403173,0.000013936115,0.008409836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998677,0.00026240858,0.00026117987,0.0002479949,0.00036163733,0.00018978448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982427,0.00021870194,0.0005834588,0.00031560872,0.00054679415,0.00009276846],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005574036,0.00015191558,0.000373752,0.00021686152,0.0003217885,0.000022563641,0.0003004632,0.00015645853,0.0043577645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012042529,0.0001791216,0.00022403972,0.000109278975,0.0009742646,0.001370563,0.00010440765,0.00033317096,0.00029762115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095263,0.001723847,0.07322536,0.0011596291,0.0011195524,0.000018800041,0.18919869,0.000050888255,0.18721922,0.5342924,0.004228341,0.006810631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008973318,0.0029063679,0.3932283,0.0009014333,0.00128721,0.000025726824,0.2714616,0.000086306456,0.101363964,0.1515935,0.06611082,0.002061431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021200834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012081534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38269892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005812072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008721797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163624476","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/4eub2","title":"Infinitism, finitude and normativity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.13990370335292582,"score_gpt":0.247732902195912,"score_spread":0.1078291988429862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163624476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13881083,0.00014517478,0.00031262406,0.011859028,0.00027539945,0.00009419972,0.000026040485,0.00014693433,0.8483298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987265,0.00003630905,0.00016351283,0.009397442,0.0004074203,0.000003185142,0.000005142741,0.0000065539207,0.0027154684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958044,0.00003807424,0.000109515575,0.00010350787,0.000065389024,0.00010305027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967915,0.000114482726,0.00003123664,0.0000649771,0.000040107163,0.000070025664],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008174534,0.00007228004,0.00012567938,0.000012177337,0.00014303839,0.000072108916,0.000054589094,0.000029308983,0.00094261003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053368123,0.00005931213,0.000030063933,0.000010748405,0.00027389886,0.00015447772,0.00004188527,0.00014331634,0.00018308753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004342778,0.000015859303,0.00033982753,0.000052472453,0.000018101315,0.000003390427,0.05755027,3.6902566e-7,0.000026144928,0.9336644,0.006527946,0.0017968995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033191236,0.00013929373,0.0008974475,0.000008625414,0.000023451708,0.0000020052794,0.005439091,0.00015207157,0.00018378052,0.020984048,0.9716363,0.00020199054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000117710726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005356328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96510834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002071634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013679192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168698922","doi":"","title":"Belief's Own Ethics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.14634534080982523,"score_gpt":0.3005148551926571,"score_spread":0.15416951438283186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168698922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013893842,0.00023551277,0.00017630741,0.0005922835,0.0015271135,0.00010872385,0.000013707826,0.0001200761,0.98333246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9457944,0.00008318386,0.00035230885,0.011830748,0.0005358377,0.000014105619,0.000020048898,0.000015321946,0.04135404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990277,0.00007867687,0.00026443854,0.00011652554,0.0001970691,0.00031558058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992373,0.00020520206,0.00009845631,0.0002160709,0.00017449884,0.00006847891],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071258424,0.00014064574,0.00017543863,0.00005174653,0.00044824302,0.00010530368,0.00015593339,0.00017531813,0.0013953137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030564904,0.000109115936,0.00010257665,0.000027908241,0.0005084859,0.00032125966,0.000029308429,0.0007326161,0.00090655347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042315073,0.00002515665,0.00006820008,0.00003526711,0.000015782118,0.000003979512,0.029055264,0.000012406602,0.0000062006725,0.9688737,0.0014070807,0.00049277814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018680574,0.00011155501,0.00008122366,0.000009411875,0.000014591347,0.00000768217,0.0027420458,0.000008052084,0.000108860426,0.073300876,0.92325735,0.00017153553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000093696464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038018514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9419784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012489163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010499725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170645942","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i2.6249","title":"Metaphilosophy and Argument: The Case of the Justification of Abduction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentative; Warrant; Epistemology; Dialectic; Philosophy; Argumentation theory; Metaphilosophy; Modern philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.07601258236806627,"score_gpt":0.2633447537202323,"score_spread":0.18733217135216604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170645942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8824942,0.00086708943,0.000036057943,0.0028505423,0.0009092548,0.00017180333,0.000031700052,0.000012920351,0.11262644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853873,0.000050980965,0.00003161492,0.00031677677,0.00013199807,0.0000042978504,0.000004638608,0.0000022460774,0.0009187423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957114,0.00004861951,0.00019984129,0.000054399196,0.0000642804,0.00006168883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940485,0.00006862446,0.00016097577,0.00018821904,0.000166991,0.000010344888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022673715,0.00005092548,0.00009504703,0.000016572756,0.00019615008,0.00001942758,0.00006569307,0.000030569474,0.00005937221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005111997,0.000026710955,0.00006064461,0.000033501517,0.00053302496,0.00012734889,0.00004039474,0.00010546027,0.0000030494866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004542494,0.000019392282,0.000039320126,0.000069622736,0.000026472688,0.0000025538204,0.012585797,0.000013656371,0.0001941247,0.9853303,0.000056141846,0.001658105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010277396,0.00036327436,0.0051515875,0.00010335711,0.0008686096,0.0009663164,0.08461981,0.00050107,0.038999908,0.6380448,0.22890441,0.00044916634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000121296755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024664766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3472855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000031431919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022987664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19639526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170886814","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/7dp36","title":"Deciding Without Intending","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Replicate; Epistemology; Coin flipping; Computer science; Data science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Statistics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.1980184634170561,"score_gpt":0.2899746338328987,"score_spread":0.09195617041584259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170886814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051703636,0.00010652812,0.0023381463,0.0069465856,0.0008816053,0.0000874292,0.0000038545827,0.0002555987,0.9376766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98313123,0.00000817155,0.00038475957,0.0059132418,0.0010967824,0.0000027109481,0.0000028150475,0.00001267182,0.009447605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949396,0.000025266627,0.00012598102,0.00013616208,0.00007837484,0.00014022947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997003,0.00006284073,0.00003566875,0.000075245254,0.00005540209,0.00007054624],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000107207576,0.000076832184,0.00013367325,0.000019104362,0.00017507747,0.00008280396,0.00010066499,0.000026482237,0.0013946585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085216045,0.000061014147,0.00005962222,0.000015437838,0.00015885456,0.00012892125,0.000037920756,0.00015422388,0.0003443417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005290958,0.00000717978,0.0005807256,0.000021336378,0.00002062958,0.0000024465105,0.039955307,8.13047e-7,0.00028345533,0.9530609,0.0051034354,0.00095848145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024518408,0.00008895784,0.000043899625,0.000022526148,0.000032755157,0.0000017805637,0.022968713,0.000463372,0.00149165,0.01431602,0.9600969,0.00022821956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000066653505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019192915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9549935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000072327953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013418628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171997934","doi":"10.1007/s11098-021-01655-8","title":"Epistemology without guidance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leverhulme Trust; York University","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Normative; Philosophy of mind; Internalism and externalism; Appeal; Externalism; Metaphysics; Mistake; Legitimacy; Meta-epistemology; Philosophy of science; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Social epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.21353781879878858,"score_gpt":0.3541081293911323,"score_spread":0.1405703105923437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171997934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07321172,0.05522054,0.00009809214,0.29236346,0.0065849195,0.00031093982,0.00006792171,0.0004285589,0.57171386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797632,0.000676108,0.00028114766,0.0055976417,0.0035057587,0.00004057571,0.000009425433,0.000024731593,0.010101418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849445,0.00020960503,0.0003570533,0.00040000762,0.0002058211,0.00033308537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985365,0.00039014497,0.000101653306,0.00032329434,0.0005732139,0.000075177704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029237592,0.00021032532,0.0005531186,0.000031229705,0.000533185,0.000046350702,0.00016242474,0.00008935618,0.00026205074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006195101,0.00017174186,0.00016172173,0.000046376994,0.0016651629,0.000093695104,0.00018611924,0.00035831306,0.00029065402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013497289,0.00009248162,0.00073114055,0.000111637,0.00027191118,0.00007312797,0.0074763466,9.852935e-7,0.000059663875,0.9883452,0.0024533486,0.0003706361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027147832,0.00006986532,0.00020437373,0.000047814523,0.000070010356,0.000018890583,0.0014640376,0.0000045557463,0.00018530879,0.7737968,0.22365096,0.00021588961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021945414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039137766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9065515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035529214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004758406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.700343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172410781","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3649785","title":"From Virtue Epistemology to Abilism: Theoretical and Empirical Developments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemic virtue; Epistemology; Virtue; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04460026040968473,"score_gpt":0.2988598727081741,"score_spread":0.25425961229848937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172410781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9572791,0.0013386018,0.0027957198,0.0134641025,0.0015653773,0.0001740803,0.000012371876,0.00005254869,0.023318116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933589,0.00013438317,0.000280717,0.002070611,0.0015356239,0.000006857663,0.00000719881,0.000026121174,0.002579586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975293,0.0002922186,0.000349378,0.0002785934,0.000251629,0.0012988668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990253,0.00021001532,0.00009320071,0.00015944673,0.00020593406,0.00030610274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019158517,0.00019066011,0.00032455998,0.000088578294,0.00028021404,0.000119194425,0.0002479086,0.00012601067,0.00010714593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027420168,0.00015157287,0.00007131986,0.000035390072,0.0006913459,0.00013433909,0.00009049717,0.0015164622,0.00016265803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010031977,0.0000537106,0.00084974867,0.0000027541491,0.0001171945,0.000008539614,0.016662363,0.0000012238866,0.000015434673,0.97852415,0.00094087154,0.0027236976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005699306,0.00054663204,0.000206201,0.000012127949,0.000041742867,0.00015702988,0.0121559,0.0000107530395,0.000019121082,0.93087965,0.05519949,0.00020140065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015030276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015559962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05425862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035357222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015745481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6588358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174367982","doi":"10.1215/00318108-8809906","title":"Self-Knowledge Requirements and Moore's Paradox","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Irrationality; Nothing; Irrational number; Rationality; Appearance of impropriety; Epistemology; Philosophy; Consistency (knowledge bases); Blame; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Theology","score_opus":0.16036985983275928,"score_gpt":0.34438372195903333,"score_spread":0.18401386212627405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174367982","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010897671,0.39537096,0.000007937754,0.3864535,0.00061352167,0.00040067977,0.000015309004,0.000098789154,0.2159495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56485903,0.3934999,0.00018876426,0.031960957,0.003916536,0.00009666282,0.000034613062,0.00005464723,0.005388863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987093,0.00034858374,0.00031742727,0.00025166397,0.00016559822,0.00020743537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989642,0.0002648134,0.000087112145,0.00042428664,0.00016916245,0.00009041803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006668176,0.00015978063,0.00039399313,0.000012382766,0.0003169332,0.00005835379,0.00019690988,0.000048979506,0.00041170482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021006394,0.00009928958,0.00014017885,0.000050224044,0.00045221415,0.00008284211,0.00013883275,0.00034570563,0.00032211555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019217894,0.00009246935,0.0000055191094,0.0016581453,0.00006276847,0.000008854361,0.0017992038,9.616571e-9,0.0000049109285,0.99137104,0.0010772011,0.003917983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009674747,0.000023568433,0.000012694888,0.00061200716,0.0001679437,0.000011094807,0.00003226648,0.0000049504915,0.0000082272945,0.53238356,0.4665492,0.000097762226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000044511194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029980953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5637693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013938394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057649493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4507879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175100152","doi":"10.1017/can.2021.8","title":"Group Agents and Moral Status: What Can We Owe to Organizations?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Zürich; University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"Gratitude; Collectivism; Individualism; Collective action; Action (physics); Social psychology; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.07136009597545154,"score_gpt":0.25179041115233675,"score_spread":0.1804303151768852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175100152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7313449,0.018522492,0.00011773213,0.2010621,0.011750138,0.00035952777,0.00051226676,0.00003140952,0.036299422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98945725,0.00047565575,0.0001992674,0.0072932215,0.0016214632,8.5846546e-7,0.000018109144,0.00002464504,0.00090953865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991677,0.000072819246,0.00025824888,0.00012214847,0.00012280807,0.0002562955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834526,0.000036156704,0.00011154725,0.00012885804,0.0006117378,0.0007664321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012261422,0.000112125126,0.00021476859,0.00019286873,0.0003125008,0.0003828114,0.00011469149,0.00004708602,0.0006698255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011760408,0.0001086616,0.000054883152,0.00010297342,0.00021458104,0.00037448475,0.00001553583,0.00023145456,0.00001817132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007720611,0.000039219733,0.0035473618,0.00007602554,0.00015961373,0.00055580965,0.09852321,0.000012718521,0.000054039807,0.88242966,0.011675496,0.0029191426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006084009,0.00024614818,0.0012270128,0.00032953956,0.00010842622,0.0001172946,0.015754567,0.000003580008,0.0000946773,0.3487318,0.63245755,0.00032103385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016729248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.116077706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6207821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008357084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008029594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9000516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175336634","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/sj29w","title":"Epistemic Modals and Alternative Possibilities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Modal verb; Proposition; Epistemology; Modal; Meaning (existential); Epistemic modality; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12737331929601947,"score_gpt":0.26457112947140915,"score_spread":0.13719781017538968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175336634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52940613,0.0006504342,0.00022086565,0.014928259,0.00045312426,0.00018275098,0.00004654767,0.00015462401,0.45395726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971087,0.000045815148,0.000110374815,0.004229224,0.00069980946,0.000005975669,0.0000044683507,0.000010916905,0.023806462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936485,0.00005369895,0.00016091207,0.00019685716,0.00008877814,0.00013491366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995609,0.00013920096,0.000048866157,0.000092168724,0.00007829609,0.00008059136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010860553,0.00010238187,0.00018067902,0.00001792317,0.0001394505,0.00008840401,0.00008620993,0.000031822103,0.0006522327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056550758,0.00007991926,0.00004683379,0.000010372224,0.00053110026,0.00015409921,0.00004538774,0.00013546519,0.00008145069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008937397,0.000009590647,0.00014848706,0.000055676555,0.0000296217,0.000002550386,0.10585714,0.0000012832259,0.00008959144,0.8919358,0.001391239,0.00047005774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009098528,0.0005098583,0.0002419226,0.000048296446,0.000073381,0.00000674007,0.088687055,0.0012503003,0.0022582065,0.7297201,0.17569052,0.00060373615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041681807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024453033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44168082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007024596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018856625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71414906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175495792","doi":"10.1007/s11229-021-03267-5","title":"Salience and metaphysical explanation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Sketch; Analogy; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Explication; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06249898446690601,"score_gpt":0.2594852331257799,"score_spread":0.19698624865887393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175495792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70402795,0.0012920582,0.00036265774,0.004303219,0.0011829595,0.000112311245,0.000040907522,0.00011831377,0.28855965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99318326,0.00005294899,0.00019379298,0.0004029094,0.00036360061,0.0000071589893,0.000007120238,0.0000074068093,0.005781821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946564,0.00007500869,0.00009245066,0.00015588391,0.000101575366,0.0001094179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995057,0.00020825173,0.000031062533,0.00013243283,0.00008485159,0.000037705664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014044248,0.00006659219,0.000121339595,0.00002108094,0.00013396113,0.00007069538,0.00004943592,0.000027786473,0.00029308125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014127418,0.000056860543,0.00004135728,0.000018981635,0.0002822352,0.00013771553,0.000027756185,0.00009537142,0.000064097236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029943035,0.000035435096,0.00007165794,0.000024910245,0.000025651701,0.000012256957,0.013962465,4.587238e-7,0.0012066088,0.9781281,0.00051919976,0.0060102893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031416278,0.00007333708,0.001212138,0.000076139935,0.00013521542,0.000023024246,0.026321651,0.00019162029,0.019806769,0.2021029,0.7492817,0.00046134813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000615315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038166923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7760252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000055530113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024837145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32090342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175573316","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12810","title":"Epistemic Akrasia and Belief‐Credence Dualism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Dualism; Epistemology; Proposition; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.43140037651408075,"score_gpt":0.39346633643776496,"score_spread":0.03793404007631579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175573316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11796238,0.016408762,0.000011607527,0.030977517,0.00027504558,0.00023150655,0.00005289321,0.00007530109,0.834005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906579,0.0021340833,0.000108480104,0.0008279413,0.0010211612,0.0000349921,0.000018654988,0.000014553456,0.0051822225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770087,0.000568958,0.00026216402,0.0005485025,0.00039631204,0.0005231864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801916,0.0010400461,0.00004571947,0.00029464945,0.00038396844,0.00021648235],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011627489,0.00017355611,0.00033280376,0.00009533288,0.00095675513,0.0002461728,0.00019760303,0.00015611346,0.000690286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048632815,0.00013862789,0.000053200507,0.00010202727,0.0028718251,0.0001535261,0.00036669636,0.0009509363,0.000087772845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030318326,0.00010483592,0.00016030937,0.00011914981,0.00003721895,0.000068038324,0.010394654,1.12539624e-7,0.00014327768,0.9862376,0.00021550704,0.002488972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026980558,0.00028842004,0.00018148117,0.00004321153,0.000011701323,0.00002403533,0.002969656,0.000007759341,0.000037788675,0.9343394,0.06165735,0.00016939835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006341478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005241638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8726955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025349746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000716273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175593634","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/3tsm9","title":"Knowledge From Falsehood: An Experimental Study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Premise; Verdict; Epistemology; Simple (philosophy); Extension (predicate logic); Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.21326256379948094,"score_gpt":0.3378427071475165,"score_spread":0.12458014334803558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175593634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77593577,0.00032422872,0.000016549853,0.00036861986,0.00057536224,0.00017798312,0.000020537986,0.00015579851,0.22242515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99213606,0.0000015449899,0.00005919436,0.0014592729,0.0017775818,0.000014397539,0.00002067329,0.000017662605,0.0045136013],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922824,0.0001109965,0.00016764016,0.0002592464,0.00009628602,0.00013756637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995721,0.00005192342,0.0000329651,0.00017390904,0.000048377307,0.00012071111],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007869924,0.00012339598,0.00019339474,0.000015661259,0.00019823077,0.00010454032,0.00017322162,0.00003320554,0.0038810787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011085092,0.0001009139,0.000057922756,0.000014563998,0.00015061357,0.00019232914,0.000061986306,0.00014541706,0.00064176804],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025499363,0.0019634815,0.0008758764,0.0000068338777,0.00008177966,0.000008270801,0.7815448,3.9344903e-7,0.0011609726,0.20756172,0.006225879,0.0005444846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013519721,0.0025073562,0.00047431342,0.000005757181,0.000072872914,2.7194577e-7,0.65287685,0.000147438,0.005823308,0.0037670077,0.33250743,0.00046540136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073186524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025455942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32628155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008891007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022249687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176353597","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0109","title":"Fooling the Victim: Of Straw Men and Those Who Fall for Them","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Adversarial system; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Law and economics; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.12006824338450683,"score_gpt":0.2821851329781331,"score_spread":0.16211688959362625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176353597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1987961,0.02752005,0.00029966573,0.012698656,0.002074276,0.00075101235,0.00023110463,0.000084119514,0.757545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99543136,0.0014330627,0.00007074618,0.0002789967,0.0011395535,0.000014295706,0.0000066056014,0.000012170847,0.001613197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942195,0.000048329577,0.00016050015,0.00016203479,0.00008044597,0.00012675904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993143,0.00029412328,0.00007792765,0.00014586377,0.00013301655,0.000034733785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002066445,0.0001026065,0.0002032579,0.000017764678,0.00035309515,0.00004752143,0.00006793224,0.000049846512,0.000021339043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031420695,0.000067686335,0.000069714944,0.000024525994,0.00029603785,0.00008051359,0.00004087311,0.00012613242,0.0000013315404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016375354,0.000035580888,0.00007266035,0.00019157697,0.0000727957,0.0000010977794,0.033044726,7.7586515e-7,0.000106661755,0.9651049,0.00026977522,0.001083114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005484925,0.00013077195,0.00012804513,0.00011759426,0.00014281573,0.000007510947,0.0064236703,0.00010637832,0.0006881587,0.90529007,0.08622849,0.00018802448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038532224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004952906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79663527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004552471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025694593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27601686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180377919","doi":"","title":"Review of Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemic virtue; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027739477147372404,"score_gpt":0.28397444430716057,"score_spread":0.25623496715978816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180377919","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20670152,0.71971804,0.001464185,0.0016190935,0.0016589166,0.00040584974,0.000023633966,0.000039022285,0.06836977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92293936,0.07509619,0.000018456798,0.00019100467,0.00069953135,0.0000044087205,0.000003211908,0.00002006227,0.001027779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974893,0.00040621375,0.0006581622,0.00010080922,0.00020497323,0.0011405557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984321,0.0002297469,0.0006861386,0.0002353303,0.0003448572,0.00007182518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005792365,0.00017364336,0.00052711216,0.00009560454,0.00019534491,0.000016480613,0.0002948631,0.00006552044,0.00015647615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002279822,0.00013690387,0.00028435967,0.000064084794,0.00049651024,0.00038935937,0.000050595576,0.001483924,0.000037399343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013793315,0.00016624543,0.00039755518,0.0027718267,0.00014056059,1.224243e-7,0.005893847,2.1521434e-7,0.0001940432,0.98520666,0.00015932822,0.005055799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001159424,0.00096811506,0.0003831489,0.012939614,0.0009741353,0.00045895966,0.01516345,0.000017618144,0.00084328424,0.8807884,0.085530385,0.00077349454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004532382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035932608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71623784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024308325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008565789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6446994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180651173","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3649537","title":"An Open and Shut Case: Epistemic Closure in the Manifest Image","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0654817544281566,"score_gpt":0.31614082049281544,"score_spread":0.2506590660646588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180651173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94843453,0.004236341,0.00007555129,0.00571603,0.00044336947,0.00031632723,0.000010810201,0.000020590973,0.04074647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995171,0.0005886414,0.000030097817,0.00051976484,0.00092299003,0.000008079121,0.000005529062,0.000020456995,0.0027334483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978943,0.0004666917,0.00026796394,0.00018284409,0.00017645341,0.0010117446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933046,0.00008481967,0.0001353664,0.00023492308,0.00012617838,0.000088275156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051335054,0.00014666129,0.00020922643,0.000062797604,0.00042359318,0.0005597755,0.00054811436,0.00006672835,0.000027728474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047743804,0.00009833332,0.0000416664,0.00003564021,0.0003083744,0.0006124342,0.000057042544,0.0019528569,0.000020125466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033986737,0.000085163,0.00081679586,0.000009070956,0.00003940089,0.0003146339,0.028421579,0.0000010167388,0.00002329551,0.9685034,0.00047662275,0.0012750357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010649156,0.00082308345,0.00017364635,0.000021458936,0.00005496941,0.016201137,0.15384087,0.000023339933,0.0000049894347,0.8047993,0.02278299,0.0002093171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017800716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084075384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16370411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018413407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010392646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9326379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181281194","doi":"10.1007/s11229-021-03293-3","title":"Standing to epistemically blame","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Epistemology; Harm; Philosophy of science; Metaphysics; Wrongdoing; Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07674753896987704,"score_gpt":0.2796177497125697,"score_spread":0.20287021074269265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181281194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3198361,0.0005925953,0.00063598616,0.009223343,0.0023522365,0.00019349993,0.000086761276,0.00019241846,0.66688704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946081,0.000020194968,0.0004648687,0.001652304,0.0008672861,0.0000136416065,0.000006884475,0.00002367,0.050870173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908143,0.00009963668,0.00018944783,0.0002295566,0.00015619375,0.00024372857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910897,0.00029156797,0.000040530937,0.0002873936,0.00016899618,0.00010252457],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028190998,0.000109284534,0.00020598958,0.000041776573,0.0001824315,0.00011546225,0.00012979942,0.00005069793,0.0016163567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040459645,0.00009831162,0.0000965442,0.00003665806,0.00017827583,0.00008172997,0.00006529726,0.00016692415,0.0005958233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013364843,0.00006488509,0.00014197807,0.000066004286,0.00005320175,0.0000629178,0.027907403,0.000002832829,0.004886319,0.96009636,0.0038511273,0.002853613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012257542,0.000046544235,0.00006501496,0.00012518586,0.00003535626,0.000009781943,0.010226906,0.000010315203,0.0065689096,0.03125105,0.95127946,0.000258895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006574312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082692254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94742835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034569788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006739647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181382971","doi":"10.1007/s11098-021-01703-3","title":"How to modify the strength of a reason","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Conditional probability; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Mathematical economics; Measure (data warehouse); Mathematics; Epistemology; Star (game theory); Computer science; Philosophy; Discrete mathematics; Statistics; Data mining","score_opus":0.20201982524177362,"score_gpt":0.32580405825088776,"score_spread":0.12378423300911415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181382971","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15383103,0.017364398,0.000026763597,0.7479677,0.0014391106,0.00029110842,0.00010194815,0.000083653285,0.07889425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932845,0.00045343337,0.000076786026,0.0016830018,0.001539634,0.000025721576,0.0000034061559,0.000010769215,0.0029227477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991049,0.000115807736,0.00017634865,0.00020545654,0.0002190281,0.00017845177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868697,0.0004807997,0.000067344685,0.00027041815,0.00044639828,0.000048064274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001990359,0.00012752613,0.00033254697,0.000020440488,0.00031640148,0.000052746855,0.00014979811,0.00004130169,0.00003764131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075794995,0.0000774017,0.00012801752,0.00005303012,0.00072400336,0.000053785814,0.00016603274,0.000230271,0.000016175176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011581709,0.00008140205,0.00003999899,0.00006623453,0.00022555207,0.0000071778645,0.01972287,0.0000011550558,0.000056921483,0.9765591,0.0020249854,0.0012029905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019095183,0.00012981934,0.00013871795,0.00006397778,0.00010325032,0.000002130354,0.0120430095,0.0000060383213,0.0007843805,0.7597592,0.22662404,0.00015448866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029541845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042884029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83945346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014412118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023769522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.315635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184969065","doi":"10.1017/epi.2021.23","title":"On the Epistemic Costs of Friendship: Against the Encroachment View","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Doxastic logic; Defeasible estate; Irrationality; Closure (psychology); Epistemology; Realm; Obligation; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Rationality; Law","score_opus":0.06567017976221233,"score_gpt":0.26778977031700746,"score_spread":0.20211959055479511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184969065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15310995,0.0051440755,0.000053720065,0.03553057,0.0030033132,0.0005758044,0.000117298165,0.000075181124,0.8023901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98113996,0.0002411707,0.000013430517,0.005019115,0.00044019823,0.000048719823,0.000026938542,0.000022179052,0.01304828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980834,0.000576524,0.00045196922,0.0002680059,0.000343176,0.00027689972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731934,0.0013622834,0.00024065039,0.00078700046,0.00024170429,0.000049015438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010519252,0.00019477199,0.00032399557,0.000027014368,0.00052210595,0.00009126924,0.00040501484,0.00006593113,0.000670013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002576754,0.000106120286,0.00023838751,0.00006874032,0.0008553117,0.000060447273,0.000094608484,0.00040628048,0.0002002393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010846406,0.000092424714,0.00003294884,0.00008633402,0.00008253689,0.000010126894,0.010840177,0.000005477215,0.00018416693,0.98147863,0.0058085574,0.0013677537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047608255,0.00016775823,0.00025993268,0.00056953327,0.000115493305,0.000011547602,0.018767146,0.000050872717,0.003081661,0.10776148,0.86836183,0.00037668782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009069843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073257374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8737172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000642311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010755822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7336173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185666711","doi":"10.1111/phib.12242","title":"Lacking, needing, and wanting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytic Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Epistemology; Psychology; Internet privacy; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.08896742578172938,"score_gpt":0.26927003054492094,"score_spread":0.18030260476319154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185666711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.114866234,0.0014731443,0.00003861618,0.00808078,0.00080484286,0.00006041632,0.000012908666,0.000096050426,0.87456703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894361,0.00008670456,0.00009191575,0.0022350622,0.0018172134,0.000002045324,0.000011938394,0.000016816652,0.006302207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919313,0.000038231035,0.00019289892,0.00024350993,0.00013274665,0.00019949315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994058,0.00010061332,0.00007849542,0.000191191,0.00015776328,0.000066125955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019267276,0.00012297541,0.00022927675,0.000062429826,0.00029273183,0.00013849519,0.00008010515,0.000049350834,0.00032879153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009946797,0.00011542456,0.00009608115,0.00004846747,0.00033636755,0.00015098634,0.00006708239,0.00020698104,0.00006858229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020446353,0.000031033276,0.0008214227,0.00006775363,0.00008268699,0.0000358575,0.0075965747,6.73087e-7,0.00009559169,0.9894726,0.0010563207,0.00073740765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036967042,0.00005181191,0.00024942646,0.00010354064,0.0001826414,0.000020635856,0.0023072734,0.00025806922,0.00038176423,0.76449347,0.23126625,0.00031545715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006854925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013159584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87456983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009617288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003821449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4706877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186997889","doi":"10.1007/s13194-021-00398-x","title":"Symmetry and partial belief geometry","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Credence; Metric (unit); Epistemology; Pairwise comparison; Space (punctuation); Commutative property; Philosophy of science; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Theoretical physics; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Pure mathematics; Physics; Geometry; Machine learning","score_opus":0.08882463160913935,"score_gpt":0.28686787312208845,"score_spread":0.1980432415129491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186997889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5106052,0.0031118316,0.0010994083,0.007252519,0.0068149655,0.0001619838,0.00007444854,0.000040053033,0.4708396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948521,0.0000940072,0.0008242643,0.00056559476,0.0019326037,4.5014679e-7,0.0000012427246,0.0000136091385,0.00171613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882334,0.00011326649,0.0003090149,0.00021665268,0.00029927722,0.00023844566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886036,0.00010496916,0.00019824572,0.00015562243,0.0005283396,0.00015246612],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020028814,0.00009809158,0.0001771333,0.00019578652,0.0010519591,0.00019339171,0.00029197457,0.000011869741,0.00006517166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003419659,0.00008307286,0.00010466371,0.00014906729,0.003393897,0.00036400705,0.00009546728,0.00024242749,0.000012617644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014784852,0.00006988337,0.00007020051,0.00006279374,0.000022745524,0.000038459,0.0060744323,0.0000026741939,0.0027911796,0.9861631,0.00053221977,0.0041575707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019353626,0.0014912537,0.0015638067,0.00038637966,0.000151388,0.00050552323,0.00643145,0.000111721354,0.01576076,0.39474696,0.57623553,0.00067985855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000012276192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001040786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5914161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010956546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011391719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187438196","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/wbjrv","title":"A Peculiar and Perpetual Tendency: An Asymmetry in Knowledge Attributions for Affirmations and Negations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negation; Attribution; Psychology; Experimental philosophy; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Philosophical methodology","score_opus":0.1665951980839617,"score_gpt":0.31981004941574775,"score_spread":0.15321485133178606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187438196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63681,0.003081911,0.01515081,0.06201894,0.00091636035,0.002094902,0.0013769368,0.0004967194,0.2780534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99661225,0.000044102293,0.0007425893,0.0006874836,0.00034221436,0.000050097602,0.00007174515,0.000009572395,0.0014399217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939436,0.000052825337,0.00017821531,0.00018518211,0.00004523652,0.00014419839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994473,0.00020726134,0.00003218413,0.00007969995,0.00012751594,0.00010605303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001429713,0.00009312583,0.0001500009,0.000063305706,0.00040918493,0.00009885182,0.000055614157,0.000053817133,0.00009231701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014566773,0.00008440271,0.000034245448,0.000050242237,0.0003103011,0.0002950771,0.000030963547,0.00013789975,0.000012922724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040524997,0.00006909513,0.00032911278,0.00004927732,0.000012232001,2.9077097e-7,0.060209893,0.000001189685,0.00003064307,0.9371634,0.0014937391,0.00063706376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025393155,0.0009010798,0.0075687002,0.000056610366,0.00021336385,0.000009530919,0.13998893,0.015141312,0.00014636801,0.13413103,0.69851464,0.00078913633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009706644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054930463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8030324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010340565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057860274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34418425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193570546","doi":"10.3390/rel12090673","title":"Religious Disagreement, Mystical Experience, and Doxastic Minimalism: Critical Notice of John Pittard’s Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religions","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Mysticism; Deference; Epistemology; Philosophy; Notice; Universality (dynamical systems); Philosophy of religion; Coherentism; Skepticism; Psychology; Social psychology; Theology; Law; Foundationalism; Political science","score_opus":0.053503461076809415,"score_gpt":0.30545863299007375,"score_spread":0.25195517191326433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193570546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9265975,0.014175752,0.0008905006,0.0064160796,0.0017067611,0.00055963657,0.00031392914,0.00014422505,0.049195636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99133235,0.0058358777,0.000786209,0.00087454566,0.00031025158,0.000035768822,0.000037949307,0.000030497704,0.00075654325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976476,0.0001894596,0.0006714935,0.0005926169,0.0004002976,0.00049855706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975701,0.0011233183,0.00013652499,0.00050448504,0.00036941236,0.00029613634],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023455462,0.00032256,0.000579524,0.00010771284,0.00044983692,0.00017239439,0.00018074403,0.00014787268,0.00012281646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006807122,0.00029246486,0.00013861505,0.000099016026,0.0022702792,0.00014124195,0.00027283008,0.0003590625,0.000028355866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096959564,0.0006221672,0.0042361626,0.00048680123,0.00019137419,0.00014160994,0.060831923,0.0000034952511,0.00065200205,0.90484756,0.027597234,0.00029272115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004931054,0.0024452594,0.007132755,0.0016961436,0.0028769874,0.00051050796,0.0897802,0.00052281667,0.0026275157,0.3145137,0.56995666,0.0030063856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026769104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050674984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5903338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031032578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111355155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195026659","doi":"10.5070/bs325254492","title":"Bringing Philosophy into Scientific Research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkeley Scientific Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23392003248449034,"score_gpt":0.36621609072251143,"score_spread":0.1322960582380211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195026659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67583895,0.0052388115,0.00023074826,0.009008021,0.040304285,0.00022593555,0.000030370753,0.0001222249,0.26900062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8430715,0.000028323058,0.0006361673,0.00016538287,0.0037677994,0.000005487831,0.000031005027,0.000034298155,0.15226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957915,0.0006041126,0.00053429307,0.0006988264,0.0014897248,0.00088155345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955546,0.00027877936,0.00017346606,0.00067351956,0.0029835438,0.00033607782],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0092894975,0.00018606955,0.00027606558,0.00068593636,0.008641948,0.0071280617,0.00066523976,0.00008889778,0.0025712901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006604815,0.00017033574,0.00026378245,0.0005846885,0.004258807,0.00075848243,0.00026538988,0.0014988768,0.0009570699],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018265453,0.00037183138,0.0004093207,0.00016347067,0.00011874426,0.00037981413,0.112229384,0.000017048676,0.014402783,0.71328235,0.14931604,0.009290942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025692143,0.000032907465,0.00005943428,0.00016265574,0.000021607268,0.00014616371,0.0075972755,0.00007965444,0.0022301108,0.23039976,0.7588009,0.00021256896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040099407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088362553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6094849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013195783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009803826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195700337","doi":"","title":"Manifest Failure: The Gettier Problem Solved","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.044431776175462415,"score_gpt":0.22430869635088513,"score_spread":0.17987692017542273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195700337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12114537,0.012955521,0.0022842851,0.016744703,0.004210354,0.0009566373,0.000017795552,0.00030535806,0.84138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95903397,0.00063619553,0.0001271338,0.00067928777,0.002114174,0.000012677349,0.0000035596079,0.00003921259,0.037353806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754304,0.00016702441,0.00029006557,0.00016075073,0.0002471171,0.0015920128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922407,0.000044677992,0.00019475735,0.00022209717,0.00023832668,0.00007609536],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002329185,0.00017425012,0.00018545079,0.00005270936,0.0006965034,0.00012077126,0.00042983048,0.00007449264,0.00034055978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027456392,0.00010825851,0.00015917244,0.00003282459,0.0004104795,0.00024434904,0.000039704126,0.002412716,0.00019094444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021154263,0.000058526904,0.00011854059,0.000005973746,0.00016949743,0.000004499362,0.0244605,5.2866073e-7,0.0000150412325,0.9703137,0.0031425802,0.0016894148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029141578,0.000244698,0.00003458846,0.00000933144,0.000071858485,0.0001971044,0.023825841,0.0000035087903,0.000024532574,0.7664125,0.20873447,0.00015014077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000283048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016952815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8378886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002001208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011757577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196644496","doi":"10.1017/apa.2020.47","title":"Using and Abusing Moorean Arguments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Dialogical self; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07847848016735143,"score_gpt":0.3007912275173255,"score_spread":0.22231274734997408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196644496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9650288,0.00014407949,0.000030670566,0.031602763,0.0007365838,0.00002981235,0.0000062553318,0.000005458328,0.0024155625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99548733,0.000059324826,0.00030780738,0.0021464264,0.0017007949,2.015241e-7,6.5594884e-7,0.000009475193,0.00028796674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989093,0.00025703482,0.00030056626,0.00008078982,0.00032506915,0.00012721597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980897,0.00024330923,0.0011118208,0.00009069612,0.00041654197,0.000047954392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048408963,0.000077351426,0.00026604065,0.000034434805,0.00025657067,0.00009064536,0.00009562669,0.00003252789,0.00001798479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005695968,0.000054507862,0.00014458627,0.000068933114,0.00023578525,0.0001513327,0.000048286172,0.00036307468,0.0000017255861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025573917,0.0012135142,0.19765934,0.00015418614,0.0027229623,0.00013471252,0.044143192,0.0003140448,0.027938766,0.70764536,0.0031077128,0.014710455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012230948,0.00028245267,0.03722038,0.0002543425,0.00079172704,0.00015082957,0.0032211742,0.0004708073,0.001388173,0.93056583,0.024005799,0.00042539276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003758069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002427938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22292046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016120564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007476124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2222766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198216133","doi":"","title":"Knowledge and Truth: A Skeptical Challenge","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03229981596449075,"score_gpt":0.2652815560203146,"score_spread":0.23298174005582387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198216133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65477836,0.026147509,0.00016201408,0.0027023356,0.0025580146,0.00019795285,0.000004941603,0.00006986446,0.313379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97033465,0.0039988286,0.000010161134,0.0000956285,0.0014336098,0.0000024209342,0.0000016934036,0.000022145297,0.024100838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981331,0.00009890284,0.00020432577,0.00018124092,0.00012265702,0.0012597216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994455,0.00016042392,0.000077995945,0.00013314634,0.000100256264,0.00008267437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010631331,0.00014151698,0.00023102181,0.000071933646,0.00025194086,0.000087548295,0.00014633893,0.00008138388,0.00029531674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038391103,0.000113673086,0.00010429415,0.00001827316,0.00023605136,0.00017489296,0.00003527506,0.001823019,0.00035916342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017202372,0.00007053385,0.000113421935,0.000019799518,0.000092184186,0.0000012984129,0.0076818806,1.3477394e-7,0.000017486629,0.98442006,0.00009519108,0.0074708196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075453985,0.0006949739,0.000097163414,0.000028008215,0.000052820604,0.00013746141,0.01025535,0.000035772646,0.000007699133,0.7945096,0.19321638,0.00021022667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020185395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019981377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3155563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001342179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056985056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79202116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199257122","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i3.6844","title":"Inference Claims as Assertions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.10907747504918679,"score_gpt":0.3166324414169478,"score_spread":0.207554966367761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199257122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12414,0.00013791079,0.00013159608,0.0012963107,0.00083251344,0.000057353394,0.000012563666,0.000104057886,0.8732877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95609134,0.00005249968,0.00014891342,0.0059891953,0.00039189713,0.000011898409,0.000052129606,0.0000061994015,0.037255917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930704,0.000029864967,0.00021353677,0.00010533889,0.00012571283,0.00021850821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993255,0.00010942076,0.000063121166,0.00019575281,0.0002484378,0.000057771987],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012623113,0.00009891261,0.00013822682,0.000033305198,0.0003117593,0.00014260228,0.00012217075,0.00007520216,0.0026914936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011557817,0.00008281954,0.00008846896,0.000035061596,0.00024993974,0.00038318813,0.00005815641,0.00026403464,0.0014737258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033692318,0.00003282775,0.00025566595,0.000018756544,0.00001680564,0.000013834776,0.00777367,0.000012191843,0.000039072816,0.9898712,0.0008289476,0.001133669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018026531,0.00010720518,0.0012531825,0.00001735756,0.000022286058,0.000015531927,0.0048593967,0.00004371027,0.0005086116,0.13745145,0.8553473,0.00019374049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009945737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088486413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8545183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000102317545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014894131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199877200","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12840","title":"Banks, Bosses, and Bears: A Pragmatist Argument Against Encroachment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pragmatism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Doxastic logic; Philosophy; Affect (linguistics); Admiration; Order (exchange); Psychology; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.26984150371992155,"score_gpt":0.36596592583023063,"score_spread":0.09612442211030908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199877200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098674834,0.012472321,0.000022865426,0.021789663,0.0002464608,0.0004324318,0.000095231444,0.0000753069,0.8661909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919258,0.0032461856,0.00038620757,0.0012478099,0.0007761035,0.00007855456,0.000050779163,0.000015307207,0.002273259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976094,0.0005368304,0.00029009694,0.0005560944,0.0004603805,0.0005472184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843514,0.0006914889,0.00005283065,0.00029556826,0.00029900897,0.00022594893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012409715,0.0001920532,0.00033197957,0.00009578021,0.000875484,0.0003474787,0.00017257902,0.00012741727,0.0005675645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029395198,0.00015107174,0.00005506481,0.000087641514,0.0019784193,0.0001424464,0.00039103738,0.0008310161,0.00006310704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032561427,0.00027406582,0.00014414509,0.00015012166,0.0000698675,0.000078277386,0.008629703,3.306276e-7,0.000067431225,0.98160297,0.00043899447,0.008511534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042824485,0.00039733297,0.00016477703,0.00004810852,0.000014411628,0.000009896801,0.0027020045,0.000021653465,0.000043149277,0.79744905,0.19851927,0.00020212473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036284804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004085343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89325094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045162156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007992349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7289569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200687122","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/bgn8m","title":"On the General Argument Against Internalism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.10702999027385383,"score_gpt":0.26878183952198353,"score_spread":0.1617518492481297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200687122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25621754,0.00004493314,0.000106048494,0.049929667,0.0007542944,0.000101095655,0.000008350338,0.00006811262,0.69276994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8804344,0.00001606778,0.000025286543,0.08622383,0.0013281519,0.000007085728,0.0000046487694,0.000009085257,0.031951435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995007,0.000051537532,0.00011224321,0.00011609966,0.0001069454,0.00011248287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968237,0.00008650852,0.000034044842,0.000118560674,0.000034018543,0.000044529035],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000104714985,0.00008000649,0.00009082666,0.000008905743,0.00015036049,0.000083056344,0.00015530785,0.000020816733,0.001782924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028634522,0.00004379144,0.0000772482,0.000008154158,0.00016665479,0.000035612717,0.00003580839,0.00018121701,0.0004913366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005278822,0.000015626667,0.0000061604824,0.0000048989345,0.000025751948,0.000002447666,0.019151814,0.000005294708,0.00007514813,0.9257785,0.054486383,0.00044267235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001446126,0.0001048394,0.000011954209,0.000009113957,0.000011040384,2.2059407e-7,0.0026556628,0.00039120167,0.00083628314,0.031226294,0.96450007,0.00010870583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008145915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013595483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9100137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007971659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000101570395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200981892","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3649820","title":"Knowledge, Certainty, and Assertion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Certainty; Epistemology; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03216753604662609,"score_gpt":0.2682203493431813,"score_spread":0.2360528132965552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200981892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81826174,0.015254902,0.00417708,0.012066818,0.0025857885,0.00021567676,0.000008171258,0.00013544134,0.1472944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521883,0.0033059523,0.000007842478,0.000098762655,0.0012374483,0.000002512437,7.632801e-7,0.000015233195,0.043143198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850833,0.00010401655,0.00017769361,0.0001304811,0.00009323968,0.0009862352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999506,0.000107263564,0.00009387332,0.00009283178,0.00013978287,0.000060243674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010979512,0.000107467604,0.00013959412,0.00006668235,0.00035915244,0.0000719848,0.000107752545,0.000055032815,0.00012557882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005874952,0.00006580997,0.000071955394,0.000015737845,0.00024191961,0.00022999999,0.000022247566,0.0006841281,0.00008958363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014719481,0.00003320969,0.00023078285,0.0000054949905,0.0000657248,6.8264234e-7,0.0024889198,4.602941e-8,0.00029986782,0.9529051,0.00032501944,0.043630417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052412477,0.00025073698,0.0001686734,0.000032051994,0.00003671714,0.000093429924,0.0033500935,0.0000034866357,0.00008607442,0.8348257,0.16049248,0.00013644164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046154124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068924935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16016747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019651187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050757057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3846173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202302542","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12776","title":"Teaching &amp; Learning Guide for: Epistemic blame","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"Research Manitoba","keywords":"Blame; Citation; Philosophy; Library science; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11815804855242666,"score_gpt":0.31729652522828883,"score_spread":0.19913847667586215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202302542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021650564,0.0012508368,0.0031416446,0.030898986,0.0027001,0.00031313088,0.00006911525,0.00039848857,0.93957716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435052,0.000029187611,0.0014432358,0.0019066005,0.0046209116,0.000042920776,0.0001661862,0.00005494564,0.048230797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984188,0.0002617239,0.00039898106,0.00037668383,0.00019695153,0.00034685398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858326,0.000498967,0.00016912862,0.00036586638,0.00029489948,0.00008788241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054851925,0.00021596802,0.00039797695,0.000066304594,0.0008592532,0.00015772834,0.0002269922,0.00007985039,0.00018579044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024369857,0.00021757826,0.0002739071,0.000026484377,0.00027442278,0.00016495402,0.00008859257,0.00067610276,0.00020501862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011200987,0.00008156106,0.00012316609,0.00017716896,0.00009226673,0.0000068305576,0.012250537,0.000036153993,0.0005510826,0.9793421,0.006348225,0.0009796866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028101116,0.00003411318,0.0000148169975,0.000059003454,0.000045005483,0.000007770665,0.0006425828,0.00008929781,0.00008296707,0.32041407,0.6781287,0.00020064341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015075733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052508985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9218547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005065412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007557628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8872584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202309894","doi":"10.1007/s11787-021-00289-y","title":"The Role of the Common in Cognitive Prosperity: Our Command of the Unspeakable and Unwriteable","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Relevance (law); Principal (computer security); Criminal justice; Criminal law; Inference; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0354634357098894,"score_gpt":0.24073988237091842,"score_spread":0.205276446661029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202309894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6929137,0.0018753635,6.714643e-7,0.0027794463,0.00020771757,0.0003116792,0.00009378891,0.000008219376,0.3018094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993943,0.00017166091,0.000004100568,0.00020078299,0.00003597588,0.0000032273117,0.0000039231427,0.0000052318833,0.005632149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912256,0.00032863423,0.00015278318,0.00011807687,0.00014499732,0.00013294541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913216,0.00024170712,0.00013327465,0.0002498373,0.0002268024,0.000016216118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032122832,0.00008224663,0.00018749556,0.000013740929,0.0003904974,0.000036360412,0.00021633768,0.0000519781,0.000039910283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008339694,0.000041432908,0.000077019344,0.000079762154,0.00083357864,0.00006646477,0.00017992438,0.00023445542,5.8891015e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042866515,0.0001566947,0.0335932,0.000044013952,0.000082894476,0.0000038580665,0.0377598,0.000008774629,0.00044187444,0.9261999,0.0005187804,0.0011473336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015609885,0.00013350155,0.022478875,0.00032712866,0.00026494742,0.000007825725,0.45247546,0.00016781462,0.014818605,0.15733725,0.35017046,0.00025716654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014900425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01799152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76886266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016153554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006575856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202812941","doi":"10.3998/ergo.2277","title":"Knowledge, Practical Knowledge, and Intentional Action","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.40026785894055994,"score_gpt":0.4920426712474265,"score_spread":0.09177481230686657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202812941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36865196,0.0019337878,0.00026311996,0.019436719,0.011471129,0.00058041955,0.00005103246,0.00012541773,0.59748644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868075,0.00044077093,0.00019701442,0.0003193315,0.005346553,0.000008380284,0.00001902755,0.000032988264,0.006828408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861085,0.00027016914,0.0004990409,0.00020724823,0.00021226988,0.00020040566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814457,0.0002991237,0.00042805437,0.00016724046,0.00077538996,0.0001856438],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011924732,0.00016222299,0.00035129924,0.00032013492,0.00043625114,0.0011755519,0.0007794016,0.000082734296,0.0006020237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002226401,0.00013330777,0.000106920816,0.00013363041,0.0004240656,0.004642948,0.0005185201,0.00057377986,0.00016133746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020947999,0.0006206487,0.00033576923,0.00012123634,0.00018878577,0.000042050488,0.007998219,0.000003502028,0.000120452874,0.9472065,0.037240926,0.0059124273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094509515,0.0005632111,0.0025102512,0.00017084468,0.0001179785,0.00010728339,0.0015217315,0.00010278575,0.0001128548,0.6850514,0.30853805,0.00025853651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026732703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003012019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6181556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003522861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002356282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203187718","doi":"10.1093/analys/anab025","title":"Settling the Unsettled: Roles for Belief","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Credence; Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Ecological rationality; Belief system; Bayesian probability; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.057532957944919146,"score_gpt":0.2836102128633554,"score_spread":0.22607725491843628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203187718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.579282,0.018884944,0.018396523,0.095840976,0.0034855474,0.00083045196,0.0011363815,0.0004637929,0.28167942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627183,0.00011321313,0.00024710476,0.0033039094,0.0010695353,0.000028749677,0.000196007,0.000015220394,0.032307982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929833,0.000076529286,0.00017230427,0.00018030325,0.00010994132,0.0001625883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989812,0.00038066274,0.00007039595,0.00029844322,0.00024346611,0.000025846448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003324879,0.00008586524,0.00022839266,0.000060279835,0.0005084447,0.00013296033,0.0001121254,0.00003859484,0.0004993275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008528539,0.000058582125,0.00044178887,0.00012373563,0.00017650565,0.000057402605,0.00002635953,0.000111099915,0.00003435384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000084780295,0.00008550967,0.00087335194,0.000041812436,0.0042586117,0.000006693004,0.034920346,0.0004057365,0.00014579635,0.94573474,0.010150022,0.003368891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018452664,0.00002443119,0.00025247256,0.000008352308,0.0042648125,8.6614904e-7,0.015575528,0.00139482,0.0007421366,0.044082787,0.93327343,0.00019582939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001351977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010376757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9231234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000083911145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035761437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57904744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203384996","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/7n6rx","title":"Selfless Assertions: Some Empirical Evidence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Assertion; Epistemology; Criticism; Popularity; Norm (philosophy); Attribution; Cognition; Psychology; Natural (archaeology); Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.48663212646851356,"score_gpt":0.3693280784431999,"score_spread":0.11730404802531363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203384996","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32287613,0.0041988,0.0026192216,0.2972397,0.003119252,0.00063069165,0.000032458618,0.0013660407,0.36791772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586784,0.00009393389,0.00030506833,0.028603293,0.001744571,0.000008266593,0.000004036247,0.000013623916,0.010548763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924207,0.00007502029,0.00017892722,0.00019818326,0.00014359728,0.00016220097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993792,0.00023417104,0.0000401614,0.00013607914,0.00010736129,0.000103012615],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001486562,0.00009523124,0.00015865041,0.000018357681,0.00020487142,0.00010092731,0.00016013574,0.000049364444,0.0013446814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017403597,0.00007485268,0.00008587452,0.000026180996,0.00023620154,0.00039271638,0.000043338652,0.00021303566,0.0008439748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010199589,0.000044804252,0.00056559965,0.000060453356,0.000027864493,0.000005340544,0.03683015,0.0000024627916,0.00010966233,0.9189972,0.042896893,0.00044933177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019522737,0.00020050062,0.00035536228,0.00004736151,0.000056775363,0.0000016146945,0.00891996,0.00036278553,0.00049622514,0.028780693,0.96028495,0.00029853065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064669715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017050454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9173881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000103539005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005258183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205692119","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3935587","title":"The Ex Post Accuracy of Subjective Beliefs: A New Measure and Decomposition","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Decomposition; Psychology; Statistics; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Data mining; Chemistry","score_opus":0.021414995517094394,"score_gpt":0.2679416412658198,"score_spread":0.24652664574872543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205692119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8589087,0.07526005,0.0020011137,0.025021592,0.0017402999,0.00034198916,0.00002505039,0.000050884693,0.036650326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98558664,0.008008723,0.000023945457,0.00022751768,0.0008783514,0.0000012442994,0.000004850441,0.000014125668,0.005254615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986144,0.00018096105,0.00022724844,0.00012181477,0.00017621076,0.0006794077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884635,0.00031619883,0.00019586137,0.00012286441,0.00046553975,0.00005316542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096299313,0.00010417702,0.00016474478,0.000032532076,0.0006050418,0.00012875618,0.00012039366,0.000049412432,0.00003254275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000192437,0.000073461626,0.00010874018,0.000032887718,0.00022302245,0.00018758375,0.000027342274,0.0011347992,0.000005903849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006037066,0.00004199015,0.00010284898,0.000009729495,0.00026227243,0.000003040025,0.013470655,0.0000011702834,0.0017844123,0.9685653,0.00017661638,0.015521607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081574835,0.00047382913,0.0006210171,0.00007177205,0.00013417377,0.0004939881,0.03989856,0.000006585835,0.0013309759,0.92992765,0.026048286,0.00017744137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026461467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024050826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12667793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011961076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021633469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207406646","doi":"10.1093/analys/anaa040","title":"Scottish dentistry and broken promises: Woollard on presuppositions and substantial negative facts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.06009612882935518,"score_gpt":0.27451066253296746,"score_spread":0.2144145337036123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207406646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9726138,0.00032064493,0.00019579478,0.0020518857,0.0001125177,0.00016479535,0.00023700921,0.00005205471,0.024251498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99674124,0.0001154313,0.000087470544,0.0009157263,0.0002480751,0.0000073941887,0.000047578782,0.000009371355,0.0018277174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920076,0.00008368065,0.00016383076,0.00027752906,0.00013301612,0.00014116944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994559,0.00014258662,0.00008064278,0.0001193805,0.0000862971,0.000115179195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000074322044,0.00012118596,0.00028324174,0.000079344325,0.00032095474,0.00022969904,0.00007019709,0.000054455668,0.00028756415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006857166,0.000110858535,0.000114607974,0.00010866622,0.0003564392,0.00015914574,0.00003674177,0.00016047792,0.00002324405],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050674786,0.00055267545,0.029982105,0.00073050783,0.019270722,0.00033474446,0.44565493,0.00017505465,0.0017364289,0.47334167,0.020858763,0.006855656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01543893,0.005280674,0.26400995,0.0006465141,0.08184865,0.000069852525,0.15429308,0.01160261,0.023264728,0.108522974,0.32744318,0.007578867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046832598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029820509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3648187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000059570802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020027283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45206797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209010997","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/t74ne","title":"Revisiting Norms of Assertion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Cognition; Process (computing); Principal (computer security); Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Computer security","score_opus":0.12385055501636688,"score_gpt":0.2735409270998621,"score_spread":0.14969037208349523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209010997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19147393,0.0001718845,0.0006964425,0.0070164544,0.00027859383,0.00008349611,0.0000060184802,0.00009307203,0.80018014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949147,0.00000974114,0.00016615182,0.0013416297,0.00071766414,9.974048e-7,0.000004780636,0.000005304721,0.002839005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996267,0.000021081803,0.00014436223,0.000074855445,0.00006620356,0.000066800996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997272,0.00004313351,0.00006113314,0.00005879293,0.00008237946,0.000027374306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010761054,0.00004318585,0.00011124784,0.000010171108,0.0000595458,0.000017410192,0.000052700765,0.000020811714,0.000717146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005494395,0.00003298068,0.00005147328,0.000012948455,0.000086189364,0.000085630505,0.000014526836,0.00007822265,0.00006767214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049006044,0.000008857483,0.00053909264,0.00012076772,0.000014938246,4.5546e-7,0.01946869,0.0000016955233,0.0012539516,0.9751533,0.00080045074,0.0026328578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007012972,0.00038771407,0.002200173,0.00012431314,0.00011685136,0.0000014522251,0.033025693,0.0011420777,0.01848746,0.029815383,0.9134924,0.0005051954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000765618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006348128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94533795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000025504617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009963178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78522456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210903325","doi":"10.18192/cjcs.vi8.5790","title":"Knowing the Skeptic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conversations The Journal of Cavellian Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Nothing; Philosophy; Dream; Epistemology; Certainty; Shadow (psychology); Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.21538752515290543,"score_gpt":0.3115197297319449,"score_spread":0.09613220457903948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210903325","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15453242,0.063524485,0.0029841003,0.6532915,0.011072588,0.000884735,0.000040557876,0.00010260977,0.113567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98896575,0.001427491,0.00004146854,0.0041622017,0.0016194513,0.0000016437797,3.4453603e-7,0.00000933264,0.0037722911],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916506,0.00017900723,0.0003121675,0.00005151927,0.00017869555,0.0001135628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824864,0.000812299,0.00027654602,0.0001170454,0.00050737115,0.000038076436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062651903,0.00009060356,0.00020375082,0.00002579117,0.00075358845,0.000050194813,0.00026452087,0.00001768751,0.00012473266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035600635,0.000043966887,0.00013513025,0.000047865575,0.0008887892,0.00014124243,0.00004597907,0.00032034007,0.00008863242],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023599765,0.000017993787,0.00009178778,0.000050498405,0.00081837364,0.0000050906124,0.8425224,0.000057017078,0.00006036636,0.09294891,0.062361598,0.0010423623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002531084,0.00012445603,0.00009607139,0.000038602808,0.00041382675,0.000008891369,0.3569278,0.000052250478,0.00011168938,0.007006943,0.63488334,0.000083010564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008837232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055035518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8344334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021087184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058903708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57960695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211784270","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x20001892","title":"Two distinct concepts of knowledge","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Descriptive knowledge; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Body of knowledge","score_opus":0.1791827637263522,"score_gpt":0.3985260757059329,"score_spread":0.2193433119795807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211784270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9407954,0.0010484296,0.000004652881,0.0006920837,0.0005225737,0.000039320286,0.000024571642,0.000015972091,0.056856986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99062926,0.0000095939695,0.00012248171,0.00013989533,0.00018455043,0.0000029128498,0.000004395395,0.000002750803,0.008904184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993266,0.000073417265,0.00014904134,0.00019170866,0.00011836204,0.00014090842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955386,0.00013811044,0.000058733007,0.00007964029,0.00012591257,0.00004373506],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033974246,0.0000732021,0.0001564687,0.00002653854,0.00032714932,0.00007542264,0.00010924961,0.00002253113,0.000326697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003716429,0.000053762094,0.000050097307,0.000058231893,0.0027244359,0.00013590575,0.000060739487,0.0000711139,0.000008663636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003981608,0.00028678155,0.017124364,0.00004841842,0.00000649204,0.000012186641,0.04619062,2.5562673e-7,0.0031641477,0.9073585,0.0018515768,0.023952637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020842743,0.0015665777,0.04538724,0.00031144306,0.00022840222,0.000058362286,0.10449832,0.00009182458,0.018723171,0.09150636,0.7343059,0.001238092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026258078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028365112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81585217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000032780183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009386177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212298668","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3643862","title":"Promises to Keep: Speech Acts and the Value of Reflective Knowledge","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Business; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.052893780357980466,"score_gpt":0.28146849911680993,"score_spread":0.22857471875882945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212298668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6370445,0.009313414,0.00031671528,0.0012274429,0.0008740363,0.0005197739,0.000005608783,0.000033924607,0.3506646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877209,0.0013338359,0.000091558126,0.0001739764,0.0005768593,0.0000072753933,4.052851e-7,0.000017263514,0.010077905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847144,0.00022840941,0.00024070214,0.00013601112,0.00011875809,0.00080466527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992572,0.00014217831,0.00015989749,0.00014269922,0.00023772237,0.000060299786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017134239,0.0001252221,0.0002517423,0.00006050555,0.0003337383,0.000038242568,0.00022115807,0.000049103783,0.00004968917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013187209,0.00007738265,0.00010175773,0.000040947943,0.0005543162,0.00012182964,0.000047053512,0.0010725344,0.000020806561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019666382,0.00006418111,0.000060031132,0.00001260623,0.00017139899,7.41571e-7,0.06218479,1.6609418e-7,0.000088647015,0.9326294,0.00008446357,0.0045068823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009448643,0.00060338393,0.00019078016,0.000034950626,0.00011252066,0.000088847635,0.016852325,0.0000036359559,0.0012229779,0.9654976,0.01431818,0.0001299274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023809068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068128416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35067642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010416039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072555064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4659688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213320442","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x2000179x","title":"The distinctive character of knowledge","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Action (physics); Social knowledge; Characterization (materials science); Relation (database)","score_opus":0.1501800006378297,"score_gpt":0.3503179901462314,"score_spread":0.20013798950840167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213320442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9653774,0.0008730815,0.0000027559029,0.0025150122,0.00063272536,0.000043833414,0.000018369603,0.000009540156,0.03052729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857794,0.000028150294,0.000022197684,0.00013534004,0.00018755361,0.000004484933,0.000002188104,0.0000020904629,0.013838602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994558,0.000069830734,0.00011600313,0.00013800328,0.0000989418,0.00012140768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947774,0.0002375844,0.000055133307,0.00007475826,0.00012872396,0.000026039768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040690307,0.00005618077,0.00009790879,0.00001381989,0.00067880657,0.00010849466,0.00010963194,0.000019842966,0.00008254136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041834195,0.000031224212,0.000041267886,0.0000416742,0.0026065635,0.00011420049,0.00005539882,0.00007236614,0.0000063815464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000583701,0.00017302162,0.005927276,0.000018979106,0.000007610584,0.0000040766604,0.047330897,3.6774246e-8,0.001790363,0.8999491,0.0014663336,0.043326516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029119305,0.00041301877,0.051502004,0.000060393802,0.000061518454,0.000011708446,0.042499542,0.000021039205,0.004184822,0.0363226,0.86433667,0.00029551788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008253969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015253235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8636265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000028242816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064215135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96039915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213733289","doi":"10.1017/psa.2022.65","title":"Prospects for Analogue Confirmation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Analogical reasoning; Computer science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Analogy; Cognitive science; Value (mathematics); Conjecture; Artificial intelligence; Position (finance); Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Psychology; Machine learning; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.11169857541287524,"score_gpt":0.29150062112907327,"score_spread":0.179802045716198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213733289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31993032,0.00046204653,0.00060258474,0.016759798,0.005056297,0.0014761101,0.00048814286,0.0001383856,0.65508634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986649,0.0000015317916,0.0001823227,0.00041295812,0.00026467378,0.00004674499,0.000008090808,0.0000037808431,0.00041496992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926937,0.000018327666,0.00014246932,0.00015748631,0.00027900608,0.00013337348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945617,0.000060518512,0.00012193072,0.00013156552,0.00020083656,0.000028973365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066673796,0.000050915416,0.0001035041,0.000102315724,0.0009466975,0.000028212924,0.00028271697,0.0000076178217,0.00010840158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058287485,0.000048235957,0.00004833922,0.000087869084,0.002269998,0.0002145937,0.000057627953,0.00008217368,0.000004213193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069227126,0.000041099705,0.000028847458,0.00003589898,0.0000031143184,1.6862403e-7,0.012104359,0.000019564077,0.0010676464,0.9863431,0.00018401316,0.00016525324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023404135,0.00031674365,0.00015702857,0.000007682179,0.000012238802,0.0000014858338,0.0020788666,0.0004160155,0.002101046,0.94500923,0.04955558,0.000110060835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003625597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000140941665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6787346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024199016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091482696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8363902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214122145","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x20001399","title":"Why is knowledge faster than (true) belief?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Cognition; Cognitive systems; Social cognition; Belief revision","score_opus":0.1649302867177256,"score_gpt":0.3489909621085375,"score_spread":0.18406067539081186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214122145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93062276,0.0014755189,0.000009644382,0.012264111,0.0010985219,0.00007519206,0.00003651948,0.00004306887,0.054374684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9441596,0.00004484029,0.00015787463,0.007569274,0.0005624453,0.000009173159,0.000007926276,0.000008780137,0.047480058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899423,0.00007806637,0.00015920338,0.0003372931,0.00017799424,0.0002532182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953204,0.00008575943,0.00004822939,0.0001318558,0.00012445047,0.00007766254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033980826,0.00012373149,0.00017122329,0.00004901797,0.00071448873,0.00034272994,0.0001655846,0.000053636926,0.0008174535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016594655,0.00009127449,0.00007597496,0.00007873158,0.0016759954,0.00029708978,0.00010105318,0.00012881095,0.00005300086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010898411,0.0008501144,0.017478487,0.000113058435,0.000028035318,0.000055964527,0.28440702,2.6184134e-7,0.0044371425,0.47593972,0.16096596,0.055713315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019995526,0.00021953479,0.00218076,0.000040580882,0.000033655822,0.000013767192,0.015447491,0.000011616414,0.0016960106,0.0101925135,0.9697013,0.00026281195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035569572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050090738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8087353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000056447116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000794066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8950543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216706552","doi":"10.1017/s003441252100041x","title":"Probing the mind of God: divine beliefs and credences","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religious Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09396858306584,"score_gpt":0.30513931156578367,"score_spread":0.21117072849994367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216706552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7108742,0.22553165,0.000005916025,0.010810176,0.0010313417,0.00021181976,0.000023269096,0.000033029504,0.05147858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97592723,0.016890196,0.00006685641,0.0002690412,0.00041638856,0.000011844035,0.000001747321,0.000007794598,0.0064088884],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993192,0.00006580069,0.00019816993,0.00015383595,0.00012092774,0.0001420917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990621,0.00040252556,0.00009644262,0.0001488434,0.00027403707,0.000016040753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024016193,0.000099905934,0.00025955646,0.000019292846,0.0004318191,0.00003852569,0.000074875876,0.000026835716,0.00001469122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017596454,0.000060862465,0.000059216945,0.000028324928,0.0010283942,0.00003974674,0.00012613565,0.00011457234,0.000006116323],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010752523,0.00009321002,0.0015693326,0.00051694433,0.00083469704,0.000023444445,0.679494,0.000004580626,0.00049004756,0.28956625,0.023610327,0.0037864104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006111684,0.00038678412,0.00079279975,0.0006487178,0.00046209895,0.000036289748,0.30000946,0.000010417669,0.0062874616,0.16253771,0.5277308,0.00048626415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013633276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021785984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5041205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000069681896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003288456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3789161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W357019491","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977206","title":"Reasons for Belief","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Rationality; Normative; Perception; Psychology; Cognition; Wish; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0823958830189237,"score_gpt":0.22430197259248152,"score_spread":0.14190608957355783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W357019491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001576638,0.00023239535,0.00020619597,0.000023938086,0.0013597787,0.0006275759,0.0016682274,0.0001784514,0.99568766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000078918994,0.00006295512,0.000095736796,0.00020387633,0.001349215,0.0000043780524,0.0002829594,0.00006651132,0.9978554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987614,0.000068590045,0.00018549239,0.00046916783,0.00015240886,0.00036290716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984461,0.00019560884,0.000272398,0.0005485157,0.00039653954,0.00014083965],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016794707,0.0003595682,0.0005139328,0.00013051533,0.0005630065,0.00006412496,0.00055040506,0.00040728666,0.000020557185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020650094,0.00040579526,0.00043076533,0.0000024544527,0.0010235362,0.00009667284,0.00018149988,0.00054594444,0.00003391657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043553908,0.000015401405,1.413294e-7,0.00018015824,0.00014741563,0.000018701041,0.0016832376,3.6069967e-8,0.0000011576342,0.6141762,0.383486,0.000247958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047751796,0.00011245245,9.66701e-7,0.00013190428,0.0005190373,0.0000026458997,0.00034758684,0.0000026474142,0.000040269577,0.00051857554,0.9973928,0.00045359373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000396902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010164621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6139068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013994765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034633468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W38472305","doi":"10.1038/s44320-024-00029-6","title":"Is Gettier\"s First Example Flawed?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute; National Institutes of Health; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; Vector Institute; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Counterexample; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.12685252012595877,"score_gpt":0.25355672144396724,"score_spread":0.12670420131800847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W38472305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000089704714,0.0016694518,0.000025491232,0.0010907796,0.0037180302,0.00092314626,0.0005366019,0.00029784584,0.991649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012386214,0.00021910791,0.00038912427,0.007797258,0.004201902,0.00004860691,0.00020677799,0.00032986284,0.98556876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573886,0.00008998618,0.0010874629,0.0012280229,0.00090400135,0.00095163746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963909,0.00027311963,0.0007997625,0.001436161,0.0006766894,0.0004233726],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009021098,0.0011803525,0.0014014954,0.000100896235,0.0011737784,0.00035331133,0.0006616677,0.0014687299,0.0033899122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030647265,0.0011959475,0.0016826555,0.000017565775,0.0024995082,0.00013394598,0.00019190802,0.0018801042,0.0009993996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012008748,0.000019231566,0.0000022519519,0.0001846856,0.0006951832,0.000019710926,0.036640137,5.5735086e-7,0.000006037402,0.47832844,0.48291585,0.0011759268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009269178,0.0001887298,3.9023374e-7,0.00023089028,0.00053460186,0.000014507098,0.0027038488,0.0000036701524,0.00008977312,0.07671714,0.9173913,0.0011982439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047777774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084250694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43447545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034338812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047360017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200107502","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/q79ku","title":"The Ethics of Nudge: Towards a governance structure for the ethical use of nudge theory by Governments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Nudge theory; Ethical theory; Point (geometry); Political science; Sociology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Economics; Epistemology; Management; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09922172144883287,"score_gpt":0.31732004562958027,"score_spread":0.2180983241807474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200107502","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15677361,0.06417264,0.051031396,0.45878246,0.05444535,0.013260151,0.07190039,0.00045763777,0.12917636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91310257,0.007287551,0.0010808511,0.022434182,0.00092032,0.0001596083,0.00022421291,0.00012367964,0.054667052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966767,0.0008391591,0.0007457322,0.0004609567,0.00094757543,0.0003299049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98878735,0.008203376,0.00092273194,0.0011369012,0.0008982701,0.00005138137],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002435232,0.00037941616,0.0006864004,0.000010673445,0.0005766873,0.00026885793,0.0009724712,0.0012577496,0.00036971326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026368506,0.0002052743,0.0005689752,0.000028114444,0.0026837473,0.000085333646,0.0007259274,0.0046852203,0.000001006064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012378053,0.0000668961,0.000016438382,0.00064926926,0.0006115991,6.19275e-7,0.031766962,0.0000190846,0.00014571345,0.9340838,0.030448908,0.002066923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047935947,0.00011567638,0.000217535,0.00016370001,0.00048788494,0.0000015221567,0.013598679,0.00018174978,0.0038024369,0.21134786,0.7691847,0.00041886943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013780358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037995605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75632894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007847552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006421946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200286320","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.11.016","title":"On the very idea of pursuitworthiness","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Spell; Epistemology; Computer science; Work (physics); Sociology; Management science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.21600713299829363,"score_gpt":0.3145594462258061,"score_spread":0.09855231322751248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200286320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63493633,0.023832537,8.078531e-7,0.0029780504,0.0046338122,0.00011934648,0.000014314179,0.000010074509,0.3334747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800104,0.00048507025,0.000009237213,0.0004938541,0.00019416951,0.000008081931,3.9485792e-7,0.000002873508,0.0008052856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991958,0.000062482126,0.00021123943,0.00018439534,0.00022627845,0.00011978049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900067,0.00040566587,0.000114007926,0.00019622434,0.00026397067,0.000019490586],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086872524,0.00007985319,0.00023495562,0.00006885944,0.0002997537,0.000005276151,0.00017026614,0.000018341327,0.000051584433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003532611,0.000054798504,0.00004722505,0.00008258574,0.014462254,0.00011120125,0.00008507391,0.00013419945,0.0000018436898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010657656,0.000049907176,0.00015963236,0.000104667146,0.000016897506,0.0000032415396,0.062480386,0.000003489142,0.00011227,0.93554026,0.0014142052,0.00010440387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021414997,0.00017676858,0.00026429282,0.0003428902,0.000029250614,0.0000019381798,0.0149205765,0.0000066887924,0.00075438246,0.88421535,0.09891174,0.000161968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019609015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011660987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36306468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042151358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011547657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9882198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205467926","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12762","title":"Epistemic blame","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"Research Manitoba","keywords":"Blame; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Key (lock); Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Social psychology; Mathematics; Physics; Computer security","score_opus":0.10752378679218974,"score_gpt":0.2723402997177292,"score_spread":0.16481651292553948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205467926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023017967,0.0011372837,0.000095252835,0.029642176,0.002755114,0.00011519846,0.000056839835,0.00020139653,0.9429788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98557925,0.000043303433,0.000110518624,0.0027418404,0.0030596454,0.000014049469,0.000048753715,0.000026529162,0.008376134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988465,0.00012888142,0.0002706393,0.0002949922,0.00019850228,0.00026049174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898773,0.00015650778,0.00009386389,0.00041138355,0.00026307063,0.00008745247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015576689,0.00017085594,0.00031449125,0.00004739072,0.00029746533,0.000111777365,0.00020016405,0.00006179358,0.00087115006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040156025,0.00016514232,0.00018196268,0.000043127464,0.00043417697,0.00013480113,0.000073975556,0.00031658766,0.0007631863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062943404,0.000101253536,0.00007465669,0.00007560018,0.000060588598,0.000039894956,0.0051095313,0.00000244924,0.00018840165,0.98936266,0.00464743,0.00033124976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026509582,0.00003061975,0.00007610932,0.00004012301,0.000035838184,0.000012512576,0.000521294,0.000031812007,0.0005029222,0.60278,0.39549845,0.00020520363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044786993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016391372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96256125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028746828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007213325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.980947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206020775","doi":"10.3138/tjt.2525","title":"Religious Skepticism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Wonder; Religious belief; Epistemology; Philosophy; Belief in God","score_opus":0.028256658126721464,"score_gpt":0.26441364064352274,"score_spread":0.23615698251680128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206020775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11847198,0.006147072,0.002004718,0.0032170112,0.007950084,0.00008644119,0.000004134147,0.000041066087,0.8620775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98728395,0.00026290322,0.00034890752,0.0014673591,0.0028383094,8.100003e-7,7.4629236e-7,0.000014135322,0.0077828784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989899,0.00024067266,0.00037041158,0.00008397253,0.000118188575,0.00019686458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885213,0.00029131788,0.00035467776,0.00017123841,0.00025909228,0.00007152136],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008255491,0.00010326852,0.00033807507,0.000032049236,0.000106368905,0.000023214443,0.0002643755,0.00008081361,0.0013231874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016707412,0.00007630086,0.00016180066,0.0000046975283,0.00048828544,0.00016163533,0.000030620522,0.00022526261,0.00007053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050603478,0.00004637596,0.000067953566,0.000011585039,0.00007829499,0.000009544946,0.021945525,0.000004981924,0.0001012952,0.95949095,0.015056937,0.0031359629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004987446,0.0007093377,0.00011330957,0.000018332701,0.00008168291,0.00012119701,0.0016134839,0.000017492745,0.00007312201,0.33332285,0.66331345,0.00011699939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000454983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028248916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86881196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042165037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003450712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206105180","doi":"10.1007/s10503-007-9021-7","title":"Book Review","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Social science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.047168097385020986,"score_gpt":0.31497934462574345,"score_spread":0.26781124724072247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206105180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054614875,0.30123073,0.0012397973,0.010312291,0.0028104335,0.0007406289,0.000012089106,0.0002044987,0.67798805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12145451,0.044233683,0.00057979726,0.51219165,0.0031134544,0.000055820612,0.00032247193,0.000057709472,0.31799093],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953514,0.000023852848,0.00015868728,0.00008384007,0.00009333684,0.00010513021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997131,0.00005311274,0.00006609671,0.00008520625,0.00005776878,0.000024721898],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036117207,0.00005249377,0.0000801732,0.000022692377,0.00011447977,0.000019676154,0.000042064177,0.000016569917,0.003018213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001592964,0.000046956444,0.000040320912,0.0000136060835,0.00008379059,0.00017764205,0.000006435035,0.00006354068,0.00039664187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059653403,0.000046771256,0.00008176879,0.00036982924,0.000026795531,0.0000036523456,0.011806403,1.519176e-7,0.00013911072,0.2977962,0.6783063,0.011417074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009820456,0.000025824766,0.00015704556,0.000095999916,0.000029240404,7.8218596e-7,0.0005046835,7.9519805e-7,0.00048789493,0.002146147,0.99639255,0.000060853214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037665486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011943075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50187933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016455584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008318368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99789315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206171194","doi":"10.3138/9781442690097","title":"High Ideals and Noble Intentions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University; ECW Press (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Noble metal; Materials science; Metallurgy","score_opus":0.06398985151460496,"score_gpt":0.21518210134256385,"score_spread":0.1511922498279589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206171194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000378173,0.0016717694,0.00003978682,0.000010924387,0.0005162696,0.00018118555,0.00022004508,0.000047621215,0.9972746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00086232205,0.00046353653,0.00015912086,0.000032415664,0.00021180771,3.1226503e-7,0.000030131392,0.000017954293,0.9982224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992854,0.000048827027,0.00014449285,0.00023366175,0.00014021632,0.00014740425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910057,0.00006292082,0.00024369307,0.00027887733,0.00024339148,0.000070574584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010618972,0.00018004018,0.0003889886,0.000021589087,0.00024881572,0.00002287875,0.00026123173,0.00021114404,0.00078526273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000058192354,0.00020359037,0.00015259412,1.9969718e-7,0.0010664152,0.00011707977,0.00018386953,0.00021231087,0.000007656653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025282581,0.00001872872,6.470516e-7,0.00019361697,0.0002066707,0.0000070159776,0.044080164,7.542397e-8,0.000007666304,0.9241163,0.03016228,0.0011815685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025766966,0.0000826223,0.000008709881,0.00013727833,0.00030020924,8.264653e-7,0.0006619066,9.748557e-7,0.00001860166,0.01725065,0.9810858,0.0001947563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.223409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24600571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9509235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000805221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011090964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8598076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206396444","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199235018.003.0018","title":"Epistemic Emotions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05733908400313674,"score_gpt":0.22219139445189304,"score_spread":0.1648523104487563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206396444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000034086235,0.00011667393,0.00005799644,0.00011006798,0.00064764405,0.00030815174,0.00022994593,0.00022774852,0.9982677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002750028,0.00018314322,0.000058083206,0.0002596392,0.00095582433,6.657331e-7,0.0001621347,0.000039348542,0.9980662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870723,0.00010403548,0.00021665379,0.00041368112,0.00022482079,0.00033357868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873435,0.000113855865,0.00027082957,0.0005353956,0.00022055519,0.00012500603],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012689854,0.00035525853,0.00048717676,0.000167616,0.0006319177,0.0000971994,0.0005405981,0.00041098098,0.0001366189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008157124,0.00040066204,0.00036420583,0.0000041781077,0.00083949807,0.00011867149,0.0001381114,0.0008446101,0.000011147529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001673653,0.00002229266,2.411944e-7,0.000109763074,0.00011833388,0.000050884388,0.0043061394,0.0000013915028,0.000001055988,0.9036597,0.08974389,0.0019695652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029768303,0.000081658516,0.0000018659699,0.00016235016,0.00030456725,0.00000464007,0.00041066622,0.000004696397,0.0000039501188,0.023904104,0.97442263,0.00040118478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010576344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004354817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8846787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021390847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028878075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206566555","doi":"10.5558/tfc86560-5","title":"Of Relevance / Question d’information","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.022516154748655162,"score_gpt":0.2569581286496641,"score_spread":0.23444197390100896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206566555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94196314,0.00009327646,0.00010451487,0.0014412979,0.0011817291,0.00012243443,0.000017945307,0.000052708205,0.055022955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980683,0.000012851038,0.00006407689,0.00015642581,0.00038459324,0.0000060248703,0.00001083714,0.000004838245,0.001292099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956393,0.000024257419,0.00015754366,0.00004777849,0.000097014316,0.0001094519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994584,0.000081254366,0.00011460557,0.00023599772,0.000092304275,0.000017445314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029048664,0.00005551953,0.00007509534,0.000014902869,0.00015974611,0.00002884923,0.00014758889,0.000043090506,0.00020205323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074081,0.000037426096,0.000042555715,0.000016266209,0.00048389527,0.00032557116,0.00002125283,0.0002440557,0.00008756286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008497416,0.000015219872,0.000102796614,0.000035363744,0.000007160614,9.90257e-8,0.007238625,0.000022226117,0.00065295474,0.98823625,0.0012512164,0.0024295722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004494964,0.0001395024,0.0029314626,0.00003076164,0.000034508892,0.0000058627697,0.0016138173,0.0010060907,0.008193045,0.13820247,0.8472304,0.0001626001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023837303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010512781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8500338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009654935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047045178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22123411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206679803","doi":"10.1002/9780470413708.refs","title":"References","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Citation; Art history; Media studies; Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.13138853783985668,"score_gpt":0.27233501501254975,"score_spread":0.14094647717269307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206679803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000028956276,0.0011931105,0.000006858867,0.00016614758,0.0015725776,0.0000679201,0.00003211357,0.00025977328,0.9966986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001779048,0.0010083098,0.000097604905,0.00058984006,0.002721252,0.000005748953,0.000031884094,0.00014450868,0.9952229],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948233,0.000028228398,0.00010030727,0.00016057392,0.000101927784,0.0001266388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996424,0.000028457729,0.00008205275,0.00019155108,0.000027262691,0.000028322565],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000039866092,0.00014058167,0.00022527207,0.00007588888,0.000083486084,0.00002949706,0.00013422075,0.00015503119,0.054214444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000070392894,0.00010118893,0.000074085176,0.0000066519046,0.0004905021,0.000018634966,0.000017758664,0.00018912503,0.0020489835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.9920923e-7,0.000008561966,0.0000018563468,0.000019519957,0.00002434735,0.0000019485324,0.0016480802,2.4304583e-9,6.774312e-8,0.3956611,0.6022854,0.0003488789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044759377,0.00001920873,0.0000010475682,0.000033310756,0.0000146720895,9.679273e-7,0.00052428537,1.4950673e-7,0.0000016118659,0.003540271,0.9956717,0.00014800354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022195322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016438387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39338636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000042373376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036648882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99872804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210350043","doi":"10.1163/17455243-20213640","title":"Kowtowing to a Non-natural Realm","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Realm; Doxastic logic; Epistemology; Normative; Natural (archaeology); Irrational number; Philosophy; Modus ponens; Face (sociological concept); Inference; Law; Political science; History; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08923116644136242,"score_gpt":0.27432625688627477,"score_spread":0.18509509044491235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210350043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7109842,0.0013584672,0.00005307897,0.05865708,0.01425775,0.00033716808,0.00006738946,0.00005401178,0.21423088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98876137,0.0000064614014,0.00031197973,0.0045329947,0.004478774,0.000004396513,0.0000031072782,0.000020608693,0.0018803385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987174,0.00010628336,0.00042150996,0.00012016244,0.00042993118,0.00020466225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914724,0.00007043729,0.00029854223,0.00015419819,0.0002140019,0.00011557871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057675573,0.00012876243,0.0003218695,0.00020007083,0.00047226818,0.000065562,0.00033749413,0.000023293942,0.0003726645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044033568,0.000109000845,0.00027207183,0.00006446549,0.00011654386,0.00023943964,0.00012567519,0.0007925353,0.000028653061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005137304,0.00042319426,0.0005049515,0.00009460444,0.0003382341,0.00048069743,0.06448736,0.0006022493,0.0013885228,0.8543844,0.07336177,0.003420234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011430979,0.0017431339,0.00043464222,0.00007991342,0.00013230111,0.00018090983,0.004015399,0.000064595646,0.00018923289,0.5128292,0.47877485,0.00041276132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041838208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013209089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40541306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007304733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070728645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44449252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210825720","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14638488","title":"(Free) Single Sign On Solution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sign (mathematics); Single sign-on; Computer science; Mathematics; Computer security; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.14981881911790296,"score_gpt":0.27777994585119525,"score_spread":0.1279611267332923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210825720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016235234,0.00053357804,0.0013762764,0.0029828588,0.0070703113,0.00024677417,0.000078718105,0.0002476324,0.9712286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8553717,0.000078925535,0.0005345196,0.002660791,0.003398385,0.00003269106,0.00029442424,0.00004754034,0.137581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873024,0.0001414399,0.0002611155,0.00041782053,0.00021854664,0.00023082674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873513,0.00014035935,0.00013844608,0.0007024628,0.00023181787,0.00005176368],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026104526,0.00023310089,0.0003410243,0.000067409936,0.00022843087,0.00031026645,0.00028158826,0.00027660202,0.0022371253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000938467,0.00020836275,0.00024621337,0.000010731525,0.000313582,0.000065390064,0.0003740818,0.0007869571,0.000117258496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001205975,0.0003586067,0.0000050324365,0.0002643558,0.00013311116,0.000014632944,0.024248097,0.00004821357,0.00022424471,0.92982143,0.042113587,0.0027566515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005406189,0.0004024746,0.00005868158,0.00055387913,0.00023350431,0.0000030047195,0.0111203985,0.00023169674,0.0033588412,0.2522194,0.73013043,0.0011470867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009678011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004953275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8391365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067723355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115790564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210930766","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14638488.v1","title":"(Free) Single Sign On Solution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sign (mathematics); Single sign-on; Computer science; Mathematics; Computer security; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.14981881911790296,"score_gpt":0.27777994585119525,"score_spread":0.1279611267332923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210930766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016235234,0.00053357804,0.0013762764,0.0029828588,0.0070703113,0.00024677417,0.000078718105,0.0002476324,0.9712286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8553717,0.000078925535,0.0005345196,0.002660791,0.003398385,0.00003269106,0.00029442424,0.00004754034,0.137581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873024,0.0001414399,0.0002611155,0.00041782053,0.00021854664,0.00023082674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873513,0.00014035935,0.00013844608,0.0007024628,0.00023181787,0.00005176368],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026104526,0.00023310089,0.0003410243,0.000067409936,0.00022843087,0.00031026645,0.00028158826,0.00027660202,0.0022371253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000938467,0.00020836275,0.00024621337,0.000010731525,0.000313582,0.000065390064,0.0003740818,0.0007869571,0.000117258496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001205975,0.0003586067,0.0000050324365,0.0002643558,0.00013311116,0.000014632944,0.024248097,0.00004821357,0.00022424471,0.92982143,0.042113587,0.0027566515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005406189,0.0004024746,0.00005868158,0.00055387913,0.00023350431,0.0000030047195,0.0111203985,0.00023169674,0.0033588412,0.2522194,0.73013043,0.0011470867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009678011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004953275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8391365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067723355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115790564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212858841","doi":"10.5558/tfc86009-1","title":"Of Relevance / Question d’Information","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Political science","score_opus":0.022516154748655162,"score_gpt":0.2569581286496641,"score_spread":0.23444197390100896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212858841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94196314,0.00009327646,0.00010451487,0.0014412979,0.0011817291,0.00012243443,0.000017945307,0.000052708205,0.055022955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980683,0.000012851038,0.00006407689,0.00015642581,0.00038459324,0.0000060248703,0.00001083714,0.000004838245,0.001292099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956393,0.000024257419,0.00015754366,0.00004777849,0.000097014316,0.0001094519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994584,0.000081254366,0.00011460557,0.00023599772,0.000092304275,0.000017445314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029048664,0.00005551953,0.00007509534,0.000014902869,0.00015974611,0.00002884923,0.00014758889,0.000043090506,0.00020205323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074081,0.000037426096,0.000042555715,0.000016266209,0.00048389527,0.00032557116,0.00002125283,0.0002440557,0.00008756286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008497416,0.000015219872,0.000102796614,0.000035363744,0.000007160614,9.90257e-8,0.007238625,0.000022226117,0.00065295474,0.98823625,0.0012512164,0.0024295722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004494964,0.0001395024,0.0029314626,0.00003076164,0.000034508892,0.0000058627697,0.0016138173,0.0010060907,0.008193045,0.13820247,0.8472304,0.0001626001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023837303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010512781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8500338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009654935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047045178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22123411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212931209","doi":"10.1111/meta.12542","title":"Grounding interventionism: Conceptual and epistemological challenges","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Interventionism (politics); Epistemology; Causation; Counterfactual thinking; Impossibility; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Ground; Political science; Law; International relations; Politics","score_opus":0.20608622477043415,"score_gpt":0.275872038539246,"score_spread":0.06978581376881188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212931209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42092338,0.06954128,0.00014590855,0.03352545,0.010179469,0.0008711408,0.00022323,0.0005912677,0.46399885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945813,0.00020861678,0.00009054464,0.00091380574,0.001062706,0.00009039606,0.000031312706,0.000022236565,0.0029990857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834144,0.00048319134,0.0003059856,0.00036644973,0.00025782618,0.00024508304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993099,0.00019789471,0.00014135294,0.0002196297,0.000056798024,0.000074400086],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008040908,0.00017970032,0.00034724275,0.00011146331,0.001064703,0.00008358639,0.00021680801,0.000046484944,0.0015556769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045459343,0.00016409936,0.00019467389,0.000034459677,0.0011586325,0.00014745592,0.00027023986,0.00046152578,0.000059801776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017559798,0.000111708796,0.00005335815,0.00004323974,0.00010886925,0.000020930165,0.01938992,9.553281e-7,0.00001389984,0.9782928,0.00033777457,0.0016089714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004014286,0.00049430033,0.00015288439,0.000010165915,0.00009319445,0.000024484612,0.015460935,0.0000125325705,0.000010454387,0.46953914,0.5135581,0.0002424169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035163557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033465283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57365793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000341317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013977349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220671018","doi":"10.1080/02691728.2022.2040637","title":"Optimizing Individual and Collective Reliability: A Puzzle","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Epistemology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Reliability (semiconductor); Voting; Crowds; Democracy; Sociology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Law; Mathematics; Philosophy; Power (physics); Statistics; Politics","score_opus":0.06759999381491154,"score_gpt":0.27686283821425467,"score_spread":0.20926284439934312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220671018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59601223,0.0011214372,0.00008289612,0.017320825,0.004763928,0.0009040194,0.0005058449,0.00029456266,0.3789943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748557,0.000007737085,0.00019119235,0.0017862028,0.00080824236,0.00016749052,0.00004416189,0.000030465098,0.022108775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799424,0.0007580236,0.00029114596,0.0003771378,0.00021666718,0.00036280323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991299,0.00038989595,0.00016794709,0.00014629042,0.000110055706,0.00005592435],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009326149,0.00016304718,0.0004040673,0.0000997491,0.0031526934,0.000068022855,0.0002059254,0.000102353966,0.0007613384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118644755,0.00017678413,0.00011919275,0.00007817731,0.0013739781,0.00009072292,0.00033672678,0.0006146152,0.000013063527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008247107,0.00014656708,0.00042809502,0.000058375044,0.00013809602,0.000026592696,0.29742235,0.0000124261705,0.000019573605,0.6908935,0.009651284,0.0011206858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013006864,0.0006786531,0.0010586033,0.000005512431,0.00017897424,0.00005592409,0.076429404,0.000050454575,0.000020721758,0.29628626,0.6233988,0.00053605414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003293401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048997113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6137475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015626621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018062955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99814504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220722819","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i1.7211","title":"Is Every Definition Persuasive?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Meaning (existential); Term (time); Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14162785444208084,"score_gpt":0.26839635873142303,"score_spread":0.1267685042893422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220722819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1050155,0.00019479381,0.000019604315,0.0010167474,0.0013754688,0.00011182847,0.00012516018,0.00010037592,0.8920405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746916,0.00002129067,0.00006223431,0.012101213,0.00036834658,0.00004257668,0.00007364073,0.000008505493,0.012630588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992771,0.000039301576,0.00018226457,0.00010047811,0.0001940033,0.0002068148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961525,0.00005915484,0.00008819827,0.00013544125,0.000068452675,0.00003351009],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002193064,0.00009409506,0.00011905691,0.0000633243,0.0007726794,0.000056693272,0.00014726954,0.00003216946,0.0069306567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019296582,0.00008593162,0.00011017947,0.000027169546,0.0002038156,0.0002823838,0.000108772074,0.00031285282,0.00041965838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002239165,0.00003643185,0.00014161556,0.00002173977,0.000019771185,0.000006717434,0.041958537,0.000016112836,0.000007353115,0.94854915,0.008390556,0.0008295955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025109327,0.00028478392,0.00036467466,0.0000031165864,0.000021049618,0.000016102154,0.01862661,0.00003806322,0.00002952362,0.057349652,0.92283875,0.0001765642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000112616624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052310454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9144482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028427681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005336714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220957334","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192859549.001.0001","title":"On Believing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07669755258246316,"score_gpt":0.2562382750942365,"score_spread":0.17954072251177336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220957334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000074432555,0.00036304325,0.0000034456925,0.00035671136,0.002720387,0.00012542735,0.00006700615,0.00012310885,0.9962334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011383236,0.00005957706,0.000011197083,0.004108794,0.0019783378,0.000015951013,0.00017180237,0.000049614013,0.9934909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990883,0.000046410918,0.00019492384,0.00025469498,0.0002443644,0.00017129442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991797,0.00030895238,0.00011545477,0.00030661622,0.00005329012,0.00003596561],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020857605,0.00020084262,0.0002994742,0.00008797261,0.00043539278,0.000069917485,0.00021180544,0.000113880036,0.06543827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023300312,0.0001745472,0.00019384448,0.000004574058,0.0002533861,0.000036684494,0.00008852398,0.00085116754,0.0009517538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020418745,0.000012293374,9.9417335e-8,0.000038834933,0.000033013035,0.0000053529884,0.0031832347,6.3065363e-7,7.853155e-8,0.6086534,0.38760036,0.00047063013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050380706,0.000089401176,1.8190211e-7,0.00002799407,0.000032614724,5.7958135e-7,0.00032079616,7.330721e-7,5.5228253e-7,0.23400387,0.7653063,0.00016660719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005446888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049031054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37770593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000949072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017178617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221147807","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2022.1.13641","title":"Epistemic Agency and the Value of Knowledge and Belief","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.032117502596920575,"score_gpt":0.2484859545414973,"score_spread":0.2163684519445767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221147807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36234793,0.011532978,0.000013251887,0.009272441,0.0019853427,0.0007289387,0.00036244205,0.00008993567,0.6136668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963083,0.000040069106,0.000019730363,0.0005188597,0.00063166383,0.00007011272,0.000013282168,0.000021202104,0.0023767734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986481,0.00034627164,0.00037655834,0.0002681205,0.00017538221,0.00018553916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989427,0.000418499,0.00020617075,0.0003143043,0.000061401166,0.000056941233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068344484,0.00017293388,0.0003624032,0.000066717526,0.0008850238,0.00004945616,0.00023356805,0.000040039962,0.00013686015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015676853,0.00013230092,0.00011234711,0.00004282681,0.0020454414,0.000069051406,0.00008171531,0.00034722188,0.000010888671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060791204,0.000083177874,0.00007506598,0.00014724703,0.00004806685,0.0000027459178,0.18402511,2.0603171e-7,0.000020515525,0.8136641,0.00036821028,0.0015047874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014905181,0.0011577918,0.00027476434,0.00003990893,0.00012129829,0.000031529653,0.011194672,0.00005564986,0.000011535618,0.90380794,0.08157383,0.00024057995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011033671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037934788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63396037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014775505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004816195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7536514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224316046","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190907686.013.13","title":"Anonymous Welfarism, Critical-Level Principles, and the Repugnant and Sadistic Conclusions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Neutrality; Sadistic personality disorder; Population; Positive economics; Economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Personality; Demography","score_opus":0.10246191585107117,"score_gpt":0.23439640359040168,"score_spread":0.1319344877393305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224316046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007573288,0.00080759457,0.000045176406,0.0005436663,0.00046017647,0.000422953,0.00082126394,0.00006750066,0.99675596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0060708937,0.0011871718,0.000058119058,0.00035032522,0.00020183073,0.0000029516423,0.000041290437,0.00003865753,0.99204874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987297,0.0001309856,0.00022132845,0.000437225,0.0002301103,0.0002506362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983823,0.00075169746,0.00017844759,0.00043174464,0.0001324982,0.00012334328],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031039203,0.00030426454,0.000495925,0.00008058713,0.0020374483,0.00011296836,0.0003108411,0.00019442299,0.0003130868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056769968,0.0002522084,0.00014575798,0.0000023728842,0.0040337034,0.00007522497,0.0010356184,0.0008756078,5.1541224e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001084051,0.000010546562,8.60712e-7,0.00013243969,0.00013514727,0.000108231565,0.00898449,3.9496845e-7,5.335727e-7,0.98901206,0.00066363363,0.00084323145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007320043,0.00007466249,0.0000043133355,0.00006879755,0.00053992355,0.000022928227,0.0012799498,0.00002987036,7.535883e-7,0.029373225,0.9675688,0.00030475648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005162136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005383662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058998034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009611996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225136396","doi":"10.35995/jci02010007","title":"Figleaves Right and Left: A Case-Study of Viewpoint Diversity Applied to the Philosophy of Language","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Controversial Ideas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Politics; Epistemology; Social science; Sociology; Statement (logic); Public relations; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.031485674297283585,"score_gpt":0.24885086865458853,"score_spread":0.21736519435730495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225136396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874598,0.0005048618,0.0000141392375,0.0017682923,0.0005052602,0.00026510173,0.000060199476,0.0000036659083,0.009418692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986146,0.00000763376,0.000011421439,0.00064543367,0.0004514022,0.0000010079151,4.904291e-7,0.0000056794784,0.0002623369],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989657,0.00017113042,0.00034932068,0.000085417145,0.00032829077,0.00010016248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998893,0.00026658026,0.00049531856,0.00013532187,0.00015557674,0.000054163254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006493268,0.00009062388,0.00039075204,0.00009750453,0.0005038418,0.000017116188,0.0002095302,0.000018949833,0.0002395067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052381296,0.00006324233,0.00013909092,0.00003042702,0.00018132493,0.0000762247,0.00026927068,0.00028970983,9.578523e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012048167,0.00081309595,0.0006584784,0.0001025638,0.0008360782,0.0008466316,0.74064547,0.00017201716,0.0005483896,0.24868292,0.0047974247,0.0006921062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009944774,0.0070484956,0.0011233852,0.00007090052,0.0016294892,0.00096473884,0.8203569,0.000033617478,0.00040428838,0.045710914,0.11225022,0.0004623022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008567793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001142169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20297201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027295266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037257018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38751948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226323143","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4077726","title":"Resolute and Correlated Bayesians","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.019072471079439105,"score_gpt":0.22331493309851702,"score_spread":0.20424246201907792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226323143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7283976,0.043742187,0.002903799,0.017990189,0.0070481743,0.0005665509,0.000073504445,0.00031625805,0.19896175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525798,0.0014026765,0.000012890505,0.0005451323,0.00057232444,0.000006782869,0.000006470534,0.000023713113,0.04485019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981376,0.0001936658,0.00020110518,0.00014516962,0.00019302232,0.0011294697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959767,0.000060356237,0.00012323653,0.000107633125,0.00005611203,0.000054978347],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014333167,0.00010758842,0.00015588314,0.00008179978,0.0014237127,0.00007544639,0.00016718746,0.000031781783,0.00044626556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021537997,0.00010007249,0.00007872961,0.000035190184,0.00019860748,0.000112951,0.00006352742,0.0028879198,0.000015734031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003265968,0.000038068316,0.00012717675,0.0000035903015,0.00011081744,0.00000841855,0.008949092,0.000011098001,0.000024255989,0.9860568,0.0012159551,0.0034220563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005201021,0.0005127515,0.00004473841,0.0000046695504,0.00006232921,0.0005959871,0.023973523,0.00009819316,0.000003095076,0.60365194,0.37036642,0.00016621861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016174627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023636292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38240483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026319647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006676909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226450307","doi":"10.1017/s0012217321000299","title":"Civility, Trust, and Responding to Echo Chambers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Compromise; Distrust; Echo (communications protocol); Chorus; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Computer science; Computer security; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.05978608826616006,"score_gpt":0.2795026484633342,"score_spread":0.21971656019717417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226450307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7384067,0.00043134118,0.000054162563,0.0031247323,0.0016294824,0.00012651613,0.00008997985,0.0000749854,0.25606206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97372663,0.000038934355,0.0001779973,0.0026897406,0.0006937043,0.000010751534,0.00004249891,0.000015580325,0.022604177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992355,0.00010263163,0.0001396657,0.00023198537,0.00009393311,0.00019629822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994189,0.00016527942,0.000029688408,0.00020417309,0.00009154821,0.00009037974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032078757,0.00009699334,0.00017999137,0.00007972718,0.00028068825,0.00014570798,0.00006573852,0.000057513207,0.00029348672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020284893,0.000094246054,0.000053622076,0.00006595009,0.00024680118,0.00008785907,0.00007889729,0.0001545988,0.00009036498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026004049,0.000050707415,0.0015368129,0.00006486769,0.000044277454,0.000054607783,0.10525428,0.0000021283001,0.0006302866,0.8839992,0.005997081,0.002339699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027835392,0.00006569642,0.0012335235,0.00003878283,0.00003191284,0.000007497081,0.005285046,0.00001631179,0.0010686334,0.035675943,0.95606273,0.00023555846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017805668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034672667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9500657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016089007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055584995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38432425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229068784","doi":"10.1007/s11406-022-00513-z","title":"Abilism, Ableism, and Reliabilism’s Achievement Gap: A Normative Argument for A New Paradigm in Epistemology","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Philosophy of language; Thought experiment; Metaphysics; Biology","score_opus":0.09264403375102466,"score_gpt":0.2843770374792366,"score_spread":0.19173300372821195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229068784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5495631,0.005138533,0.00038671464,0.36570558,0.0066017844,0.005959228,0.00071808504,0.00031242828,0.06561453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901081,0.00005942037,0.00031965508,0.004983742,0.0010889422,0.00069608033,0.00007137372,0.000039291866,0.0026334145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981823,0.00025011055,0.0005019423,0.00044282147,0.00021634052,0.0004064859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989084,0.000410535,0.00019708526,0.00031699328,0.000050957624,0.00011600796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081409625,0.0002419192,0.00045031498,0.00016355843,0.00052757724,0.000052865966,0.00023370562,0.000058999598,0.00030619363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060123934,0.00023698318,0.00012101591,0.000056844212,0.00037934052,0.00016382097,0.0001940332,0.00041563064,0.000015635884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013746088,0.00026507766,0.000308441,0.00012792337,0.00005587588,0.000008090692,0.04965662,0.00010186466,0.000018715606,0.9451591,0.0037244812,0.00043635687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001225361,0.00054516364,0.00020271578,0.000014936015,0.000037069156,0.000008031149,0.0021957646,0.00016040968,0.000013015232,0.68573976,0.30962744,0.00023032077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006343211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006687794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44054496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016509222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121225305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96638936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229513038","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198852834.001.0001","title":"Prejudice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08718266495232815,"score_gpt":0.2533728501548577,"score_spread":0.16619018520252957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229513038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002487715,0.0020153155,0.000014474761,0.00046307824,0.0024043294,0.000100708276,0.00004823453,0.000107930755,0.9948434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000035562563,0.0001916657,0.00005812204,0.002383321,0.0040718373,0.000007983788,0.00023932043,0.00004218264,0.99297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991199,0.00003966993,0.00021608117,0.00027325208,0.0001747853,0.00017633507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991112,0.00015138728,0.000107750886,0.000346311,0.00023388844,0.000049459795],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013350979,0.00020270336,0.0003680145,0.000044452485,0.00016647052,0.000121292884,0.0001659755,0.00023685845,0.016069544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023337625,0.00017775912,0.00021201835,0.000004937002,0.00043188359,0.00005966015,0.00006815265,0.0005392537,0.001046593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.200725e-7,0.000009843262,1.2911805e-7,0.00008245226,0.00006112737,0.00000987425,0.0032281193,3.6675978e-8,2.814053e-7,0.5896144,0.40665996,0.00033292454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057690904,0.000021802005,3.983429e-7,0.00007652403,0.00007890811,0.0000019022085,0.00044644333,5.777901e-7,0.000006292278,0.10952408,0.889584,0.00020138247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007801416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022751081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.482924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041956204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229698470","doi":"10.1002/tht.27","title":"Aha! Trick Questions, Independence, and the Epistemology of Disagreement","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Epistemology; Independence (probability theory); sort; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.039163960784125124,"score_gpt":0.2591638248835249,"score_spread":0.21999986409939978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229698470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5240138,0.036829617,0.0010825819,0.11042559,0.006201537,0.001719079,0.00006203084,0.000055381002,0.31961036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954751,0.00047221457,0.0002606961,0.0006489342,0.0015426679,0.000007909462,9.22066e-7,0.000011320961,0.0015802298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984192,0.00037627984,0.00065127277,0.000101925616,0.00029742208,0.00015386398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980547,0.00047663247,0.00070002483,0.00019305112,0.00050579984,0.000069827154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011023887,0.00013509374,0.00046548827,0.00012537594,0.0001836552,0.00005121206,0.0002682322,0.00007444691,0.00028737998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013988612,0.000077051554,0.00017827435,0.000047376507,0.0015692071,0.00027387,0.000057913297,0.00043786378,0.000023017286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008916036,0.00009439513,0.00032532657,0.00006496846,0.00014261715,0.0000054601906,0.00777534,0.0000019786987,0.000035464775,0.9884315,0.0014241713,0.0016096045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001692535,0.00034273078,0.0005741213,0.00010756566,0.00016291735,0.000088663226,0.0011059127,0.000021680524,0.00007547423,0.9739166,0.021794079,0.000117723546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012650648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041782507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4714613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015700502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005976801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5781809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229710647","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/ahrzt","title":"The Point of Assertion is to Transmit Knowledge","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Cognition; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1366534153234211,"score_gpt":0.3196607569625679,"score_spread":0.1830073416391468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229710647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012004065,0.0012813023,0.0025926162,0.048810378,0.0038467806,0.0007550386,0.00011566382,0.00014008752,0.9304541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9382618,0.00023131788,0.00023278806,0.002658349,0.0012493095,0.000057288784,0.000024142057,0.00003469685,0.05725033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896914,0.00010285446,0.0003643116,0.000269948,0.00013820291,0.00015552474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897057,0.00018690445,0.00011769808,0.0003700793,0.00028816654,0.00006656861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036361028,0.00017470792,0.00032332202,0.000036211753,0.00019334628,0.000099654506,0.00034177373,0.00013523614,0.00051235687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004341311,0.000113554976,0.00027318083,0.000018209841,0.00024838178,0.00003272568,0.00016547096,0.0005084146,0.00020479562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002155859,0.000053651158,0.0000060079824,0.00032977364,0.00012754659,4.4870836e-7,0.13652338,0.000002694228,0.00011574816,0.8260433,0.033301733,0.0034741429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010458849,0.0001037402,0.000073899755,0.00009420557,0.00009633589,2.0570185e-7,0.0055713584,0.00007755776,0.0025484709,0.1582472,0.832873,0.00020946415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043995224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038576017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9262577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019144514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011267669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56099486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230029321","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-35713-8_12","title":"Truth Values","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in physics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Truth value; Interpretation (philosophy); Coherence theory of truth; Truth function; Statement (logic); Topos theory; Theoretical physics; Quantum logic; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Interpretations of quantum mechanics; Quantum nonlocality; Quantum; Physics; Logical truth; Pure mathematics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Quantum mechanics; Pragmatic theory of truth; Computer science; Quantum process; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05558997345585254,"score_gpt":0.25415924037280946,"score_spread":0.19856926691695692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230029321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000864545,0.0015168884,0.0013027366,0.0003466552,0.0029854039,0.00034822954,0.00009883592,0.00013235694,0.9931824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17797785,0.00078241626,0.0011107457,0.0054780664,0.035967905,0.00008022028,0.0006339918,0.0005863123,0.7773825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998383,0.00004360238,0.00039612016,0.00050243596,0.0003012599,0.0003736018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817085,0.000706392,0.00027773468,0.0005784036,0.00020161104,0.00006503406],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012925774,0.0005577002,0.0007411977,0.000089643334,0.00018242806,0.00014487727,0.00033062414,0.0004954589,0.0018565175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075954784,0.00048571452,0.00033149007,0.000015096476,0.00080963713,0.0001429586,0.00008276598,0.0014285195,0.0009412922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006302865,0.00003167096,0.000002833314,0.0001402073,0.00010089289,0.000008130726,0.010136411,0.000054297947,0.000005872791,0.9543751,0.0012286812,0.033909585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013767996,0.000055450713,0.0000016349642,0.00015333698,0.00007630345,9.47103e-7,0.00002050955,0.000031961634,0.00010683512,0.7257955,0.27320373,0.00041609874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013314416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003585891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27197504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007069252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008841677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230128308","doi":"10.22215/etd/2010-09338","title":"Thought, meaning and reference : cognitive and contextualist challenges to the truth-conditional view of meaning","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Cognition; Humanities; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10891077232366742,"score_gpt":0.3166733871971906,"score_spread":0.2077626148735232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230128308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046428755,0.010133866,0.000021324355,0.0009238051,0.0013133025,0.0004771143,0.0003829073,0.000046860794,0.9402721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98114747,0.002693737,0.00006985271,0.00039643366,0.0005894633,0.000052134343,0.0006291399,0.000030009756,0.014391761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887335,0.000118882745,0.00031574361,0.00032982492,0.00020232642,0.00015984023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978953,0.00115751,0.0002452316,0.00013482712,0.00050699327,0.000060133458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043717038,0.00023988022,0.00043695176,0.00007308374,0.00038350897,0.000095345364,0.00012345635,0.00018908807,0.0003075238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002843158,0.000164214,0.00005620443,0.000016040449,0.00041890194,0.000114795344,0.000033834087,0.0005753152,0.000009835829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003754095,0.00001573997,0.0000020333166,0.00033351217,0.00009239981,8.5619826e-7,0.097249754,2.9448593e-8,0.000032987977,0.89253706,0.0001390152,0.009559097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008427295,0.00050381804,0.0014948205,0.0020468575,0.0006932331,0.000013854735,0.5283196,0.0000099694425,0.0008536392,0.17907892,0.28522503,0.0009175131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024420104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054156333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9347187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004945674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005149847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9631028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230413506","doi":"10.1017/s0012217310000466","title":"Knowing Persons","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.054448058937236705,"score_gpt":0.26216938296328474,"score_spread":0.20772132402604804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230413506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3123793,0.000078975434,0.000030798252,0.001350289,0.006374881,0.00009669812,0.000056607518,0.00013345969,0.679499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98015785,0.000003980089,0.00010145157,0.0008214778,0.002618215,0.000009014611,0.00003311273,0.000014251535,0.016240643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950516,0.000027495395,0.000095342686,0.00012778779,0.00007015525,0.0001740655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959,0.00010219089,0.000031514537,0.00017632278,0.000050797426,0.000049203212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018206637,0.00008023658,0.00011580972,0.00003486381,0.00026917167,0.000068106114,0.00011419943,0.00006497495,0.0007129795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007518551,0.000070106194,0.00008373892,0.000012041129,0.0003517755,0.00009764395,0.000021396,0.00035329472,0.0004335102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001994381,0.000034760506,0.00023022354,0.000011908448,0.00001734907,0.0000043777686,0.043669913,1.8151943e-7,0.0013050477,0.9440291,0.008463191,0.002231956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012231542,0.000021215888,0.00021094318,0.000004791394,0.00001799595,0.0000017346148,0.0017651395,0.000010367803,0.000258869,0.01573655,0.98172736,0.00012273695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041258297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006929767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97326416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000039524057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028276525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78066254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230708296","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/r5htu","title":"From virtue epistemology to abilism: theoretical and empirical developments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Wake Forest University; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Epistemology; Virtue; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Epistemic virtue; Empirical research; Social epistemology; Cognition; Empirical evidence; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09056768956157125,"score_gpt":0.324400382215548,"score_spread":0.23383269265397677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230708296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4528717,0.00036874413,0.0051016435,0.10312871,0.007815119,0.0013395649,0.00055670936,0.0005053526,0.42831245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971411,0.000029095498,0.004406206,0.018377345,0.0021543878,0.00007648705,0.00017801225,0.00005520858,0.003312252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976249,0.000312431,0.0005471614,0.000942531,0.00024113744,0.00033183783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983247,0.00063103205,0.00011224505,0.00043847336,0.00016165119,0.0003318821],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003323253,0.0004125843,0.0008171662,0.00007886855,0.00019807815,0.00021619358,0.0004167697,0.00048370424,0.001876006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002890435,0.0003410134,0.00014568507,0.000021411095,0.0015827408,0.000043929434,0.0013500917,0.0010860502,0.00047529372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060289978,0.000058521196,0.00032609145,0.00010428805,0.00016982656,0.000026808646,0.044181563,0.0000014590003,0.000017029048,0.94468814,0.009621031,0.00074495655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024426935,0.00014422859,0.00085464824,0.00006839716,0.00010255464,0.0000033008077,0.0024643561,0.000064565895,0.00007580271,0.8438511,0.15158021,0.00054659235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000492728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044046732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5185393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049297734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022585702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231089120","doi":"10.32920/14636133.v1","title":"Truth, Superassertability, and Conceivability","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Epistemology; Statement (logic); Wright; Argument (complex analysis); Coherence theory of truth; Philosophy; Pragmatic theory of truth; Legitimacy; Truth condition; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10081561519758016,"score_gpt":0.29297838797343123,"score_spread":0.1921627727758511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231089120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8261057,0.0009165656,0.000033610737,0.0011517052,0.0031298085,0.0002519921,0.000053139935,0.00012134413,0.1682361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918265,0.000137971,0.000258913,0.0005370099,0.000733177,0.00003426662,0.000102039885,0.00002236012,0.0063478146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982165,0.00025598073,0.00039684455,0.0007126182,0.00017553219,0.00024251977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981644,0.0005561649,0.000088470326,0.0007167133,0.0003733047,0.00010093502],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005895625,0.0002902834,0.00060660916,0.000033430413,0.00021973325,0.00044310302,0.00020871247,0.00030115282,0.002810684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002664286,0.0002500912,0.00021269431,0.000010989594,0.0013434102,0.000115742296,0.0005764089,0.00090909866,0.000014571754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011332745,0.00019702979,0.0050291386,0.0012226702,0.00016618417,0.000008048487,0.06786332,0.0000024762116,0.000037016966,0.9238009,0.0004322905,0.0012296113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010808659,0.0002098879,0.013715115,0.0003467763,0.0005318579,0.000013959026,0.09721301,0.00026397622,0.0012864204,0.73448855,0.14851691,0.0023326648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00227478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0095465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18931231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003422987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021726366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232158781","doi":"10.1017/s0012217320000116","title":"Introduction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Spell; Philosophy; Sketch; Epistemology; Triangulation; Miller; Sociology; Theology; Computer science; Cartography","score_opus":0.07974375601866021,"score_gpt":0.24270391303687702,"score_spread":0.1629601570182168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232158781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099965185,0.00065539754,0.001281491,0.25239047,0.01420509,0.000445377,0.00014510789,0.00075080956,0.6301611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.968936,0.000018373501,0.00006753131,0.0059477733,0.021230578,0.000006782577,0.000091409776,0.00001295099,0.003688599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958545,0.000035824443,0.00009233107,0.00013078414,0.000058300244,0.00009733004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997624,0.00002672422,0.000030767595,0.00008630473,0.00004916169,0.00004463963],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007376224,0.00005732428,0.000097725846,0.00001275266,0.00010863945,0.000037601843,0.000064519234,0.000029252511,0.0008215267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000823078,0.000051243987,0.000045823454,0.000015375152,0.0001675506,0.000083656036,0.000015081217,0.00012691149,0.00087698386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008533462,0.000018006654,0.0000401309,0.000021829299,0.000016659355,0.0000020657742,0.038600214,0.000003483355,0.00029985778,0.8280859,0.13133922,0.0015641246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089306726,0.000048698083,0.000041428928,0.0000011621787,0.0000120052455,3.765085e-7,0.00087886263,0.000021341588,0.0002642182,0.007825876,0.99074733,0.00006939324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006838486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001666618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8689708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005065263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001290265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232487124","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_100596","title":"Collective Beliefs","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.07497944928657534,"score_gpt":0.2425566575904702,"score_spread":0.1675772083038949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232487124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000016408056,0.00029233133,0.00009926076,0.0004145206,0.0015577353,0.00018599567,0.000051737665,0.00011699656,0.99727976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006012907,0.000057275436,0.0000473793,0.0020571472,0.0031396206,0.0000082594115,0.000043933804,0.000061815874,0.99398327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990776,0.000020876287,0.00024474095,0.00029703634,0.00017592993,0.00018378106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990303,0.00019251433,0.00015726108,0.0003027753,0.0002570228,0.000060164217],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016897095,0.00028096655,0.0004522062,0.00009213788,0.00030300097,0.00007978966,0.00016419849,0.00028545954,0.011928097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017477825,0.00023390437,0.00022876426,0.0000028486847,0.00067937956,0.000033277538,0.00005066719,0.00050296326,0.0021226327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040610776,0.000006143876,2.7953664e-7,0.000039313796,0.00011460255,0.000002719789,0.009706147,9.351518e-8,4.175977e-7,0.91127527,0.07809982,0.0007511078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008183677,0.00007222203,4.980491e-7,0.000036761616,0.000050663253,9.569399e-7,0.00009475654,9.550714e-7,0.000003903502,0.34505695,0.65439755,0.00020291083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000098706994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00245539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57629776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007642767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002052491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232561879","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/2huft","title":"How to Do Better: Toward Normalizing Experimentation in Epistemology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Epistemology of Wikipedia; Epistemology; Introspection; Social epistemology; Formal epistemology; Philosophy; Meta-epistemology; Commonsense knowledge; Experimental philosophy; Commonsense reasoning; Field (mathematics); Philosophical methodology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1435987317532526,"score_gpt":0.32005415634754397,"score_spread":0.17645542459429137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232561879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37689796,0.0023086818,0.009883223,0.187574,0.015661469,0.0029287615,0.00020241548,0.00065015705,0.40389332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816988,0.000045149816,0.002275185,0.008588487,0.0018291055,0.00018741631,0.00013296014,0.000046475074,0.0051964303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817634,0.00021766573,0.00043394137,0.0006303127,0.0002014637,0.00034030073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999117,0.00010903981,0.00018491765,0.00035444848,0.000118945376,0.00011563388],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027543996,0.0003276241,0.00060003734,0.0001940238,0.000106219326,0.0004489054,0.000365897,0.0002661908,0.00037658776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006448494,0.000316369,0.00017446399,0.00003331124,0.00021349247,0.00014916615,0.00050720444,0.0007671723,0.0001221971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044382363,0.0000829445,0.00080199435,0.00064103655,0.00011408462,0.000057501984,0.3039354,0.000033261887,0.0005322667,0.68302083,0.0076036872,0.003132615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012196217,0.0004917136,0.00093972357,0.0004533767,0.00014237792,0.000009183351,0.10452268,0.00016343938,0.0065396745,0.1665063,0.71697766,0.0020342318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012813358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015469836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70937395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099286946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000080348684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232575378","doi":"10.1215/00318108-3321751","title":"<i>Epistemological Disjunctivism</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; General interest","score_opus":0.13529463736851016,"score_gpt":0.29880055248784515,"score_spread":0.163505915119335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232575378","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005686615,0.029334715,0.00011611064,0.83710974,0.0006542842,0.00042054625,0.000027325432,0.00012639092,0.13164224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9091511,0.03576038,0.000017935863,0.042444397,0.0029248653,0.00010065997,0.000004720349,0.00003180159,0.009564178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983063,0.00042929203,0.00039053743,0.00029197853,0.00027334277,0.00030858407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981807,0.0008752938,0.00013517817,0.0005877163,0.00011482099,0.000106295214],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010097239,0.00020831214,0.00047451642,0.000015286972,0.00031083685,0.00003237442,0.00046817795,0.00006796861,0.0016072916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000528607,0.000079308054,0.00029714304,0.000040196534,0.0015675897,0.00010753889,0.00011375208,0.00031433016,0.0017211956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008040706,0.00005194939,0.00000793689,0.00027497203,0.000027816142,0.000005395393,0.00018349683,7.500319e-9,0.000028133481,0.98536164,0.0027536405,0.011296951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100694364,0.000059511003,0.000016432516,0.00073713454,0.000073003954,0.000008810352,0.000006386618,2.3652728e-7,0.0000068485847,0.61249894,0.38638064,0.000111382964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008311509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000133398635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9085824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002200765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028740038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233557003","doi":"10.32920/14753850","title":"Externalism, Memory, and Self-Knowledge","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Externalism; Doctrine; Epistemology; Individuation; Self-knowledge; Subject (documents); Inclusion (mineral); Psychology; Value (mathematics); A priori and a posteriori; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Mathematics; Computer science; Theology","score_opus":0.07167107920821292,"score_gpt":0.290100854881818,"score_spread":0.2184297756736051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233557003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13791241,0.00859649,0.00016516619,0.0008233915,0.006292783,0.00026086136,0.000034626548,0.0003170544,0.8455972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7546521,0.001903039,0.0012484326,0.001484533,0.0051429966,0.000058529287,0.000105449624,0.000076954835,0.23532796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987513,0.00014829561,0.00028161242,0.0004745002,0.00012647593,0.00021781395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989466,0.00013332721,0.0001207153,0.0004478962,0.00026079486,0.000090669186],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031926355,0.0002742763,0.00045539625,0.00006570288,0.00020010179,0.00047573663,0.00021717841,0.00024098279,0.0015613112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023312228,0.00023844295,0.00017635705,0.000009262666,0.0003542554,0.000084178384,0.0006537749,0.0007478357,0.00006708803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004791769,0.00036516896,0.00007906009,0.0015315729,0.00043964002,0.00004765151,0.2727025,0.0000023821617,0.000021356347,0.70989966,0.01144416,0.0034620939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046922403,0.00006203339,0.0002740908,0.00036484277,0.00040121475,0.000018994493,0.017751096,0.00025059487,0.000404558,0.062224086,0.9168011,0.0009781885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085664267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040151384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90535694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024391795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015542899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233742189","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/7uc2b","title":"Vision, Knowledge, and Assertion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Attribution; Perception; Psychology; Object (grammar); Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10449003541209659,"score_gpt":0.32833523298365913,"score_spread":0.22384519757156254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233742189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016724424,0.0025152925,0.00055409834,0.0065983925,0.0037530113,0.0002998147,0.000031594667,0.00027573883,0.96924764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93187505,0.00045800602,0.00035672047,0.0012944613,0.0027027903,0.000025685871,0.00010760433,0.000036795234,0.06314287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991505,0.000080379425,0.00021717888,0.00034470312,0.00008582904,0.00012140535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993595,0.000087891036,0.000091049944,0.00021124602,0.0001762981,0.000074000935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018822192,0.0001773562,0.00028703938,0.000044111894,0.00016563151,0.00019455588,0.0001250592,0.00018334333,0.0005399897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043511627,0.00014643332,0.00009353838,0.000008792208,0.00027385994,0.0000675818,0.0003449104,0.0005842892,0.0002060792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065840427,0.00005973313,0.00004646163,0.00043692935,0.000062830084,0.0000019358656,0.028818568,8.0832984e-7,0.000033092427,0.9267424,0.040454462,0.0033362438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001238821,0.00007079498,0.00039299898,0.000085067164,0.00007256154,6.715052e-7,0.0012512298,0.00026328446,0.00007030938,0.23491119,0.76250046,0.00025752166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017565608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014465725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91515064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012615932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006859161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59713775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233965954","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/zd9y7","title":"Knowledge and Assertion in \"Gettier\" Cases","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Assertion; Epistemology; Norm (philosophy); Cognition; Process (computing); Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1927301818297894,"score_gpt":0.3326239336127368,"score_spread":0.13989375178294738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233965954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21930543,0.0062961085,0.000061000872,0.004127106,0.003161249,0.00045578319,0.00006670182,0.00020134356,0.7663253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98356444,0.00020202644,0.00010863968,0.00047888167,0.0009855562,0.000026742053,0.00007011683,0.000020001296,0.014543595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991331,0.00011278887,0.00023358641,0.0003082007,0.00007937984,0.00013293455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944335,0.00013189817,0.000073038624,0.00016052689,0.00012312364,0.00006807592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002553064,0.00017073247,0.0003204484,0.00007625914,0.000065299,0.00011366592,0.00009923313,0.0001712468,0.00016000766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010349044,0.00015142355,0.000060626808,0.000014027036,0.00022647354,0.00006532228,0.00025204703,0.0006063182,0.000058428246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023145243,0.0001222239,0.00065429305,0.00079896976,0.000059053367,0.00004733803,0.092681445,0.0000051448887,0.000016710153,0.8810793,0.021525336,0.0029870295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046878416,0.00015463319,0.00096137903,0.00023688533,0.00009880343,0.0000072312123,0.010864431,0.00056098413,0.00009576989,0.33543915,0.6504875,0.0006244703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011885574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017863702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76425904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003292731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001343775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99683654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234313437","doi":"10.1177/095647480001100214","title":"Book Review: “I Need Thinkers – not Reporters”","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journalism Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.04196776680039939,"score_gpt":0.27933155915965224,"score_spread":0.23736379235925287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234313437","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000049137034,0.8531664,0.0000021324947,0.02776507,0.0007255646,0.00050420297,0.00003491935,0.0000900812,0.117662475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00004609499,0.6438138,0.000032632335,0.2628836,0.00080718903,0.000025196176,0.000028537448,0.000029725257,0.09233325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714893,0.00036495834,0.001236391,0.00035923888,0.00046870322,0.00042179297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984244,0.00007236983,0.0005135695,0.00048798995,0.00029048804,0.00021118538],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016253316,0.00025977485,0.0010068425,0.00003410293,0.00045490725,0.00027320208,0.00037319315,0.000081289574,0.06413854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018756198,0.00026041773,0.000617043,0.00006974183,0.00035496976,0.0005156623,0.000028584693,0.0006912824,0.0008145976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002128651,0.000036540358,0.000001630428,0.0049934834,0.00006614585,0.00042394278,0.00043739937,6.134111e-8,8.313758e-7,0.0018569778,0.9206569,0.07152391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018800166,0.000032311014,0.000024293258,0.046749752,0.00037261625,0.002159832,0.000047314796,5.0130836e-7,0.0000015550647,0.0005573277,0.9495567,0.00030977966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037104866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012616723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23511852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037470203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009295035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235941408","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/cbxh3","title":"The Radicalism of Truth-insensitive Epistemology: Truth's Profound Effect on the Evaluation of Belief","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Embodied cognition; Rationality; Proposition; Skepticism; Psychology","score_opus":0.1720948845666625,"score_gpt":0.33948506361326125,"score_spread":0.16739017904659875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235941408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51041776,0.0016233228,0.00013203445,0.026185375,0.011185625,0.005011817,0.00033405534,0.00011644279,0.44499356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99664843,0.00007613289,0.000017747307,0.00058477855,0.0009820262,0.0001591096,0.00006976809,0.000036079044,0.0014259208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938988,0.0036122527,0.0007871834,0.00050232775,0.0009288196,0.0002706223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874121,0.009833989,0.0008921097,0.00085173635,0.00095458166,0.000055500677],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066216276,0.00037635508,0.00085523544,0.00006778802,0.00046477647,0.00008172668,0.0005436522,0.00034116965,0.0002361537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029544288,0.00019042031,0.00048741626,0.000041985157,0.0028341974,0.00003388298,0.000291753,0.0012289217,0.000035511403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000158074,0.000075437165,0.000009077492,0.00033830342,0.0005591187,0.000001916079,0.01779471,0.000028847546,0.00008710724,0.9762767,0.0015235189,0.0031472095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016987984,0.0020282462,0.0009616579,0.0006738589,0.0022502362,0.000006036863,0.008366157,0.0025269089,0.012881389,0.9476379,0.020292053,0.0006767147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043300464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036589857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48623067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007403685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038786398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237462899","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12064","title":"Unreliable Knowledge","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Successor cardinal; Inference; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.439834482939109,"score_gpt":0.39175419009185797,"score_spread":0.048080292847251016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237462899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021869168,0.0027953293,0.0000062765957,0.0072235195,0.00027734935,0.00033233306,0.000009384558,0.0000766035,0.96741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817169,0.00033716118,0.00006897199,0.0004126539,0.0013877928,0.0001311399,0.000007859189,0.000014590665,0.015922965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982481,0.00032581718,0.00021324228,0.0003713817,0.00025710557,0.0005843646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981637,0.0009102549,0.000031140975,0.0002592547,0.000434718,0.00020095793],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091073796,0.00014962807,0.0002467267,0.00013571829,0.00083007757,0.00023588633,0.00028770528,0.00012661942,0.004385293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002508767,0.00010622736,0.00005527723,0.00009274754,0.002287569,0.00022017403,0.00024319216,0.00084190606,0.0026733265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012511358,0.00017464202,0.00005705843,0.00005960198,0.000023121518,0.0000022793515,0.008145821,1.8743981e-7,0.00002906834,0.9839659,0.0038410663,0.0036887536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016600115,0.00032320732,0.000052776864,0.000015165552,0.0000038677085,9.2599174e-7,0.0013313679,0.000022094924,0.000007006644,0.77605534,0.22190665,0.00011562975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021157619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025517898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9598477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002720097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038401195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237654671","doi":"10.1093/analys/63.3.173","title":"Solidity and impediment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Solidity; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05338023569034206,"score_gpt":0.26365561498305456,"score_spread":0.2102753792927125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237654671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6831995,0.0010800352,0.00044926748,0.0006687143,0.0003952486,0.0000761323,0.00001700376,0.000053355165,0.3140607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894774,0.00008433658,0.00006981182,0.00041800944,0.00012382305,0.0000034514646,0.0000070700403,0.0000041207413,0.009811967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994895,0.000066257526,0.00011298176,0.00013515474,0.00007943123,0.00011667466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965227,0.000057976977,0.00004363259,0.0001481001,0.000054922202,0.000043119144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024697412,0.00006759554,0.00018053614,0.00007984347,0.00018612258,0.000052011685,0.000037425107,0.000027344078,0.00089484296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027642282,0.00005568024,0.00012333487,0.000056308138,0.00017397683,0.00005805576,0.0000105210775,0.00007401751,0.00003812058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016022864,0.00004850376,0.0053866417,0.000012577708,0.0011561401,0.0000027936478,0.014405491,0.000008202389,0.00002780178,0.9766126,0.0018056964,0.00053191406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029668308,0.0000733797,0.002060579,0.0000040111736,0.0041388143,0.0000014056459,0.007752536,0.00020540137,0.0006006584,0.059625756,0.9248945,0.00034628122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003399826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019379469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9230888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006926671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011177887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9797903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239093844","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_3444","title":"Reference Reconciliation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Encyclopedia of Database Systems","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.0819483191719738,"score_gpt":0.26316955859619057,"score_spread":0.18122123942421675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239093844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004403453,0.0035580213,0.00002574296,0.000066766544,0.0036191577,0.00046111093,0.0030819292,0.00008468953,0.98905855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013046202,0.0041379347,0.00007869644,0.000091343776,0.0032417432,0.00001727863,0.0025459472,0.000056294914,0.98852617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786997,0.00007779869,0.0008908935,0.0004686707,0.0004509186,0.00024176513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975138,0.00021512405,0.00088510924,0.0008568385,0.00043322533,0.000095905365],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058701594,0.00039297368,0.00078551425,0.00017510039,0.00014219577,0.00005101639,0.00033391386,0.00031350096,0.0009091237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008398527,0.00036417425,0.00016218513,0.00001063975,0.00032887355,0.00027512357,0.000059705442,0.00061871606,0.00052747567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011678033,0.000022747176,0.0000032709688,0.0005729428,0.00007741629,0.000011445832,0.0024643086,0.0000011085264,0.000005455629,0.9535794,0.039429434,0.0038207436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016219298,0.00010479201,0.0000028565812,0.0007599837,0.00013566228,0.000003884675,0.00032445736,0.000005901221,0.0000035201524,0.0067560645,0.9913662,0.00037447189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006582441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001103169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9519368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006030254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002071922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239116814","doi":"10.1002/9781118748213.index","title":"Index","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Citation index; Sociology; Library science; Citation; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1306499535056179,"score_gpt":0.30818072469660085,"score_spread":0.17753077119098296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239116814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003142506,0.0017356543,0.000049809827,0.00044642924,0.013066883,0.00012441468,0.00012800258,0.000054201504,0.9843632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033088475,0.0001462857,0.000017135533,0.0016063368,0.0068068597,0.000014282176,0.00029366495,0.00004125452,0.9877653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989704,0.000069330476,0.0002382665,0.00025469167,0.00022407898,0.00024326766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903333,0.00006517718,0.00013108128,0.00033120523,0.00034877114,0.00009041514],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024026202,0.00024092267,0.0004207031,0.0000854907,0.00014397841,0.0001467159,0.00024966025,0.00031775495,0.053426888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020238736,0.00018707126,0.0001380091,0.000012925273,0.00049096276,0.00008004331,0.00006537752,0.0006208287,0.06379127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003209762,0.00002046159,7.5568124e-7,0.00006416188,0.000051055948,0.0000014530226,0.0054954407,0.000001069594,2.0930116e-7,0.19770788,0.7963192,0.00033513975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012956651,0.000041749874,4.8833834e-7,0.000027338972,0.000029775341,9.630459e-7,0.001486935,0.000003955621,0.000004237844,0.009690535,0.98832524,0.0002592425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009899306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022195904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19200604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033721673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024931098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9474384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239331224","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2128","title":"Self-Perceived Burden to Others","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0520120408551226,"score_gpt":0.2480768425581832,"score_spread":0.19606480170306062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239331224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000042595573,0.00008887897,0.000072680254,0.0014309307,0.0012900893,0.00028137173,0.000030404377,0.00026921995,0.9964938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001477906,0.00006530939,0.00038072775,0.004433666,0.004274998,0.00000950175,0.000025075891,0.00009663769,0.9892362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988595,0.00002467807,0.00028538264,0.00037380276,0.0002110557,0.00024555135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990018,0.000117223804,0.00011339116,0.00045195673,0.00018547804,0.00013013973],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019923333,0.00033991656,0.00048603214,0.00011323668,0.00019461951,0.00011036536,0.0002790756,0.00028573824,0.010618306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012308056,0.00028288463,0.00023260238,0.0000030131152,0.00026630837,0.00003618911,0.00005830263,0.00040443984,0.005418109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004283848,0.0000047344633,1.9104532e-7,0.00007452836,0.00013629012,0.0000028541826,0.02663247,7.415193e-7,0.0000047249646,0.9378463,0.034268398,0.0010244595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010776009,0.000097573306,6.0365187e-7,0.00006298916,0.0000988175,0.0000010163216,0.0007183931,0.000004850361,0.0000026684152,0.045994043,0.9525284,0.00038287553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002856489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019411212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91826004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004109439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005166814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239598162","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00104.x","title":"Epistemic Intuitions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sketch; Relevance (law); Philosophy; Formal epistemology; Epistemic virtue; Psychology; Social epistemology; Computer science; Algorithm; Political science","score_opus":0.10793054532606942,"score_gpt":0.29289884825377277,"score_spread":0.18496830292770333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239598162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019421957,0.00026086156,0.0011656197,0.01002275,0.0021789747,0.00017665004,0.000045697918,0.0002376909,0.9664898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925767,0.000012143726,0.00013617975,0.00170205,0.0033475957,0.0000100508705,0.00003316246,0.000022581937,0.0021595324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892926,0.00005036004,0.00031600572,0.00021630166,0.00018107302,0.00030702644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990948,0.00023087604,0.00010504731,0.00030226205,0.00016212156,0.000104935025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043116912,0.00015707941,0.00023414563,0.000114748924,0.0004136773,0.00006395812,0.00021903584,0.00006217444,0.00041066046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002754767,0.000147994,0.0001429683,0.000044681045,0.00059412094,0.00014817581,0.00004384052,0.00032424778,0.00065736775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011405829,0.00009345699,0.00007490835,0.00003822467,0.000034475932,0.000008911508,0.005856676,0.0000010895782,0.00007261737,0.9900695,0.0031380688,0.00060063106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022576653,0.000055201617,0.00022020997,0.000030351881,0.000026712403,0.000005579292,0.0006001269,0.000011668723,0.00015153365,0.7127477,0.28573555,0.00018959718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000904574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038888745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9731547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004033191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024938978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8449352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240045488","doi":"10.1215/00318108-3683702","title":"Book reviews","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Presupposition; Contextualism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Extant taxon; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.16457040432500217,"score_gpt":0.32653637707859307,"score_spread":0.1619659727535909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240045488","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000044651315,0.45746824,0.000018132841,0.4812228,0.0002646298,0.000352523,0.000007142418,0.00003621422,0.060625862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00426912,0.8039489,0.000012395637,0.16299975,0.0027352497,0.00010795076,0.0000027928586,0.00002328024,0.025900556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985018,0.0004175106,0.0004540589,0.00021409776,0.00018020942,0.00023232975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986395,0.00039877382,0.00016440482,0.00062808034,0.00008555571,0.00008366584],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012542176,0.00017375476,0.0005118714,0.000014064709,0.00023347158,0.000022820272,0.00040659445,0.000043516986,0.005900551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005304295,0.000067435205,0.00030630492,0.000030127107,0.0008181391,0.00012522493,0.00007127709,0.00024360357,0.0048229857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022078702,0.000020688034,5.081317e-7,0.0005876454,0.000014828767,0.0000013059258,0.0002324515,1.234742e-9,0.000009888697,0.8823249,0.096419185,0.02038642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052859767,0.000023159628,0.0000010834971,0.0019349017,0.000068410256,0.00000274105,0.0000017507426,6.297511e-8,0.0000030834456,0.3769456,0.62088746,0.00007887364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004678504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008874242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52446824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001638551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023214408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241581630","doi":"10.1023/a:1015823716891","title":"Collective Responsibility","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Ethics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Virtue; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Moral responsibility; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.26137485680682826,"score_gpt":0.3316648048393938,"score_spread":0.07028994803256555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241581630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41940483,0.0048600384,0.00041126157,0.07611479,0.005009527,0.00029898004,0.000027802716,0.000045112047,0.49382767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9605096,0.00034143307,0.00008808456,0.002640549,0.0010609629,5.1465196e-7,1.5838107e-7,0.000011233097,0.035347488],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803454,0.0010868891,0.0003473596,0.00005794224,0.00033291627,0.00014038518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994993,0.003557516,0.00033064047,0.00021293717,0.00085761497,0.000048340462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005507621,0.00008587886,0.00020178255,0.000054599295,0.0005645315,0.000045634493,0.00027010907,0.00011094318,0.0006876627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019074236,0.000050378043,0.00012621302,0.00004558699,0.0010055708,0.00013067419,0.000028845712,0.0019410786,0.00004868957],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019256992,0.00013785552,0.00005783955,0.000033231147,0.00012596241,0.000010892332,0.7225593,0.00002004189,0.0001648788,0.2581854,0.01808992,0.00042213066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007492043,0.00087319245,0.0004594153,0.00010306287,0.0002689065,0.00011658313,0.028391434,0.00011239525,0.0006096633,0.43944064,0.528648,0.0002275115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041063227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047982618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69416785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006973985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025411183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84331286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241757869","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1683066","title":"Gender and Philosophical Intuition","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03920508153699433,"score_gpt":0.26340784581029064,"score_spread":0.22420276427329633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241757869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8965062,0.0018449232,0.0011943714,0.006456135,0.0024557407,0.00012864641,0.000006195668,0.000074216965,0.09133357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942306,0.00073473563,0.000030481497,0.00042083298,0.0032379695,0.0000021676708,0.0000030244794,0.000015080817,0.0013250508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986687,0.000053671403,0.00016527812,0.00012753405,0.00013311298,0.00085172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996073,0.000047274883,0.000079586236,0.000096951255,0.0000996038,0.00006924609],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010014914,0.00010290642,0.00012749074,0.000059773967,0.00041091812,0.000101373276,0.00010358639,0.00008861266,0.00020327876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044501558,0.00008386892,0.000067389265,0.000013818025,0.00036200567,0.00018214651,0.000020282576,0.0032001093,0.000036074838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010069726,0.000029672614,0.000103847466,0.0000052919413,0.0000509,0.0000014993873,0.002381511,1.0702472e-7,0.0003855724,0.99355114,0.000066386514,0.0034139932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002597494,0.0001093649,0.000121890356,0.000003131907,0.00003171404,0.00025646848,0.0018395578,0.0000093539875,0.000024179317,0.9716059,0.02563258,0.00010610199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025379404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017744084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09772445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004881763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040920035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242272019","doi":"10.3138/9781487535933","title":"Necessary but Not Sufficient","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ontario Arts Council; Canada Council for the Arts; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.061767756935356445,"score_gpt":0.21888571075564905,"score_spread":0.15711795382029262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242272019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000045235556,0.0013153376,0.000031216918,0.000067167195,0.0008034147,0.00025090654,0.0005066398,0.00009536411,0.9968847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00076918973,0.00021231233,0.00006498802,0.00022486824,0.00063830713,2.716465e-7,0.00007745833,0.00003047059,0.99798214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882156,0.00007816132,0.00020155273,0.00037550976,0.00030385552,0.0002193391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988171,0.000110129855,0.00034035568,0.00038251912,0.00022909092,0.000120823745],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010178974,0.00027467907,0.00055581034,0.000019092702,0.0002776258,0.000036160567,0.0005975524,0.00027267652,0.0007949321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008959062,0.00031862588,0.00031908913,3.7865124e-7,0.0010093836,0.000110025976,0.0002852693,0.0003948846,0.00003035354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011541899,0.000042491807,3.3243393e-7,0.00047038184,0.00028357326,0.0000551288,0.113890044,0.0000024205704,0.00002363255,0.73607737,0.14799263,0.0010465491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031935133,0.0001302163,0.0000023056225,0.00011239133,0.00028698146,6.5188e-7,0.0018090581,0.000016145039,0.000080153266,0.0006515633,0.9962844,0.00030676826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062107947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042588107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84829175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019284568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027430913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242909947","doi":"10.1093/analys/anz012","title":"Explaining Knowledge","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Philosophy; Epistemology; Foley; Art history; Classics; History; Law","score_opus":0.05527764643097315,"score_gpt":0.28380846024099105,"score_spread":0.22853081381001789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242909947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29872787,0.0003430486,0.000078392324,0.00016666453,0.00034641675,0.000039779567,0.0000055522314,0.00005043175,0.70024186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9169606,0.000014676848,0.000034138997,0.00024790026,0.00026534253,0.0000037034117,0.000022251214,0.000007731705,0.08244365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939376,0.000054323285,0.00014759862,0.00017207759,0.000081424114,0.0001508187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943525,0.00012179888,0.00005921977,0.0002553819,0.00009358191,0.00003474236],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023586386,0.000082467166,0.00025592864,0.00017162024,0.00013466385,0.000060091657,0.00011386649,0.00003700943,0.0039374833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000150913,0.0000702766,0.00027108708,0.00012280307,0.00009872127,0.00010447861,0.000026930287,0.00011497264,0.0019322231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004310785,0.000062544736,0.012139861,0.000028724913,0.0017167155,0.0000020454759,0.06218816,0.000043692784,0.000053608717,0.92006516,0.0020932711,0.0016019115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002250105,0.000054993747,0.0013629656,0.000011498982,0.0017094433,3.1051619e-7,0.01558459,0.0011224302,0.00010982276,0.0050693336,0.9744652,0.0002844091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021535961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021696312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97237194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010749169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016739526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243106686","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5328","title":"From the Editors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07177379185878373,"score_gpt":0.2706586713046958,"score_spread":0.19888487944591204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243106686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078431405,0.00007742715,0.000052339234,0.0032530543,0.016922398,0.00010465887,0.00005262797,0.00010861071,0.90099746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88779944,0.000006119853,0.00006718999,0.008212842,0.094675615,0.000007436051,0.000026024934,0.000007549765,0.009197752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994711,0.00002267805,0.00014708095,0.000072560586,0.000113453156,0.00017311699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994546,0.00015353046,0.00006268084,0.0001920192,0.00010882119,0.000028342853],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017968063,0.000080521226,0.00008944407,0.0000125747965,0.00039999592,0.00009633445,0.00022139918,0.00005401183,0.0016270633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005357501,0.00004469234,0.00005901511,0.0000139404465,0.0009071533,0.00022202882,0.00005347107,0.00017362442,0.0016877587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014836452,0.000015717573,0.0002279511,0.0000045443444,0.000032558557,0.0000013466259,0.07671042,6.65549e-7,0.00000818901,0.6748396,0.24577971,0.0023644664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085201194,0.00009156488,0.00052391854,0.0000048385023,0.000011488276,5.2632856e-7,0.004064322,0.000014195147,0.00006220052,0.031820834,0.9632462,0.00007470161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068260834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055750425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89179975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005290467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002498481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243834848","doi":"10.32920/14636133","title":"Truth, Superassertability, and Conceivability","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Epistemology; Statement (logic); Argument (complex analysis); Wright; Philosophy; Legitimacy; Coherence theory of truth; Pragmatic theory of truth; Computer science; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.10081561519758016,"score_gpt":0.29297838797343123,"score_spread":0.1921627727758511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243834848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8261057,0.0009165656,0.000033610737,0.0011517052,0.0031298085,0.0002519921,0.000053139935,0.00012134413,0.1682361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918265,0.000137971,0.000258913,0.0005370099,0.000733177,0.00003426662,0.000102039885,0.00002236012,0.0063478146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982165,0.00025598073,0.00039684455,0.0007126182,0.00017553219,0.00024251977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981644,0.0005561649,0.000088470326,0.0007167133,0.0003733047,0.00010093502],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005895625,0.0002902834,0.00060660916,0.000033430413,0.00021973325,0.00044310302,0.00020871247,0.00030115282,0.002810684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002664286,0.0002500912,0.00021269431,0.000010989594,0.0013434102,0.000115742296,0.0005764089,0.00090909866,0.000014571754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011332745,0.00019702979,0.0050291386,0.0012226702,0.00016618417,0.000008048487,0.06786332,0.0000024762116,0.000037016966,0.9238009,0.0004322905,0.0012296113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010808659,0.0002098879,0.013715115,0.0003467763,0.0005318579,0.000013959026,0.09721301,0.00026397622,0.0012864204,0.73448855,0.14851691,0.0023326648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00227478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0095465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18931231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003422987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021726366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243881088","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/yev3s","title":"Is Knowledge Justified True Belief?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Point (geometry); Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2515479990223647,"score_gpt":0.3381484366118795,"score_spread":0.0866004375895148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243881088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016490425,0.0013157604,0.00026528243,0.00974888,0.0072300676,0.00035796495,0.00027846542,0.00037383244,0.9787807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4735179,0.00041105988,0.00052892725,0.009999964,0.010972612,0.00009892717,0.00037281157,0.00012252462,0.5039753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983302,0.00011148658,0.00043570175,0.00064353313,0.00017604517,0.00030307446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862343,0.00015933023,0.00017759344,0.0006156035,0.00028263128,0.00014140827],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023371779,0.00038158742,0.0006265984,0.000080359845,0.00027964325,0.00024688066,0.0004954397,0.0003844285,0.005332559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062691535,0.00033207535,0.0003991819,0.000021030317,0.00053258514,0.000060507486,0.00064784003,0.0013555937,0.002319334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008331886,0.00008076402,0.0000054674783,0.0006778202,0.00016536549,0.0000050329977,0.0938885,0.0000011952059,0.000019147385,0.7258126,0.17793529,0.0014005001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001739132,0.000042124353,0.000016779804,0.00007864581,0.0001724996,5.9945535e-7,0.0028312537,0.000115544295,0.00024250653,0.13543683,0.8604778,0.0004115008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053214806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017955827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6825425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035847865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002516755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243934947","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/ysqnj","title":"Understanding and the Norm of Explanation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Assertion; Introspection; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4511930415737336,"score_gpt":0.2960137743835239,"score_spread":0.1551792671902097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243934947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005003777,0.0005660155,0.008774231,0.019539548,0.0016250248,0.00042184282,0.000052781586,0.000066309694,0.96395046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963611,0.00020469044,0.00006280736,0.0005423225,0.00037628537,0.0000070120423,0.000021502485,0.000007605298,0.0024167066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947137,0.00006343278,0.00017501939,0.0001280484,0.00010267996,0.000059438087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994005,0.0002632195,0.00014177151,0.0001248387,0.00005262079,0.000017071388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028748365,0.000086991306,0.0002214601,0.000027144215,0.00011426588,0.00006634135,0.00009715549,0.000070098184,0.00013897523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042589112,0.000052945878,0.00007004243,0.000006281126,0.0006937017,0.000031952957,0.00014239237,0.00029751463,0.0000035210755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001554751,0.000004433724,0.000015900667,0.00016732697,0.000057869045,2.7605518e-7,0.044170193,0.0000031328732,0.0000019898919,0.95416576,0.0013469257,0.00005063568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000364592,0.000017021324,0.00001720234,0.000045847068,0.00008506625,3.4200448e-7,0.021467797,0.00039585363,0.0000403142,0.9656572,0.011811563,0.000097245626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004486995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013926984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99135727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016398664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031215182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25559726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245134956","doi":"10.1111/papq.12299","title":"Unacknowledged Permissivism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Proposition; Epistemology; Permissive; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09859490224146784,"score_gpt":0.26310399378009874,"score_spread":0.1645090915386309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245134956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017085,0.00037698908,0.00024294533,0.14199153,0.0016486543,0.0002836053,0.000066545,0.0005274001,0.8377773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889696,0.000006669373,0.000049179213,0.0024822217,0.005620627,0.000019460225,0.000021650425,0.000041349205,0.0027892122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982931,0.0001638737,0.00038185922,0.0004637038,0.00027878178,0.00041868052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884075,0.00015739333,0.00009889739,0.00030565503,0.0001848838,0.00041242046],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020084699,0.00026434055,0.00039925508,0.00004775639,0.0004412134,0.00015443457,0.00030006966,0.00013855322,0.0014660833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009661763,0.00023064594,0.00022755217,0.0000615485,0.00071800273,0.0002018868,0.000020766847,0.00062558515,0.002201748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041864074,0.00011190745,0.000013085182,0.000087566805,0.000050219096,0.000026945128,0.10320393,2.2048431e-7,0.00038427033,0.88734776,0.00618951,0.0025427325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056416716,0.0009210028,0.000031138024,0.000028573568,0.000051639036,0.00000388907,0.0068408363,0.00030026174,0.000048888487,0.6614719,0.32929212,0.00044560505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000053264253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012913791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018259552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005791638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245195506","doi":"10.1111/1467-9973.00287","title":"Oracularity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Falsifiability; Judgement; Argument (complex analysis); Metaphysics; Credibility; Philosophy; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.1064484508213111,"score_gpt":0.2662004836574623,"score_spread":0.1597520328361512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245195506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028420238,0.0010074276,0.00014030111,0.001610292,0.0019304052,0.000164797,0.00002162395,0.0001516029,0.96655333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98833495,0.000019893316,0.0005434292,0.0020756433,0.0008053699,0.000017068003,0.00001125035,0.000027529262,0.008164854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885154,0.00021222839,0.00022799695,0.00025798558,0.00020009284,0.0002501707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992384,0.000084745814,0.0000819614,0.00036942,0.0001420108,0.00008350869],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050855457,0.00017115643,0.00027849758,0.00008317665,0.00034016112,0.000089328096,0.0001576536,0.00007326704,0.0013637345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013168583,0.0001456709,0.00020605608,0.000051156705,0.00047027867,0.00017882112,0.000020048466,0.00028529813,0.0006865758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032971914,0.00008591795,0.000113971335,0.000021947886,0.000069091264,0.0000075976627,0.003273959,6.896117e-7,0.000044696106,0.9950002,0.0011965149,0.00018213631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014204072,0.000031459316,0.000022592503,0.0000035662463,0.00004868108,0.0000024620163,0.00022986147,0.0000018077188,0.00031738373,0.44062456,0.5584425,0.00013312719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004969515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008559052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95991474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013311102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003361478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245343541","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/e368c","title":"Contingent A Priori Knowledge","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20774104811930547,"score_gpt":0.3247151762239398,"score_spread":0.11697412810463434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245343541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004061114,0.0018240395,0.0002949726,0.0042214426,0.0067614745,0.00041026124,0.00005821323,0.0003572409,0.98201126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74739885,0.0002417154,0.00063408416,0.0028570378,0.010033881,0.00009057315,0.00013784581,0.000085643995,0.23852037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870896,0.00010215516,0.0003530092,0.00045970516,0.0001343251,0.00024185704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989606,0.000117103766,0.00017627022,0.0003854992,0.00025263568,0.00010785171],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024632816,0.00027896493,0.00050639536,0.000049872273,0.00017744215,0.00022239712,0.00034330285,0.00021910896,0.0015396866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007584132,0.00023745473,0.0002963211,0.000011621114,0.00036803732,0.00003952244,0.00061727216,0.0009989461,0.0009977202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006190081,0.000072137904,0.00002120006,0.0004598336,0.00014618514,0.0000055540413,0.078313276,7.0164907e-7,0.000013401913,0.8808502,0.038458742,0.001652605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014643761,0.000038562186,0.000022189277,0.000079145415,0.00009778151,4.3332884e-7,0.0021751977,0.0000731245,0.00008331343,0.07132603,0.92565346,0.0003043521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034017264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021399478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8871947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003383099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021451952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246667039","doi":"10.1002/9781118785317.weom020040","title":"Reflective Equilibrium","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Wiley Encyclopedia of Management","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflective equilibrium; Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03897551974540666,"score_gpt":0.274034554507316,"score_spread":0.23505903476190934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246667039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000086648115,0.0027908017,0.000015382557,0.000116882315,0.003423234,0.0005339417,0.00017477733,0.00019532457,0.992741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00008053217,0.0030444087,0.00053768256,0.00021996225,0.00232992,0.000053371426,0.00014042118,0.00029957527,0.9932941],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984542,0.00009494602,0.00034664792,0.00039465458,0.00040785596,0.00030168044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988117,0.000035875473,0.00038435622,0.00056695193,0.00011654478,0.00008454653],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031548057,0.0003291601,0.0005341984,0.00029486528,0.000039258975,0.000028190252,0.00038725074,0.00017302077,0.004017123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021093909,0.00030112462,0.00013630844,0.00005170024,0.0004717519,0.000061195235,0.00021358396,0.00025342056,0.0005518156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102578015,0.00008734812,0.0000034085037,0.00051135325,0.00032431236,0.000014816817,0.0042931377,6.8834265e-7,2.6066064e-7,0.11994844,0.8721718,0.0026341758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028449256,0.000093412,0.0000034549737,0.00033173486,0.00023852664,3.4399204e-7,0.0013463114,0.0000010154619,0.0000011637918,0.0111701945,0.9862226,0.00030674582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038862604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013188218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1140508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046384284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058966452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246804678","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_101380","title":"Trust","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.10173698126920636,"score_gpt":0.25791559195364,"score_spread":0.15617861068443364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246804678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001161746,0.00026541617,0.00001037805,0.00029460035,0.0022407025,0.00010159571,0.000051815867,0.0001164507,0.9969074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00028492772,0.0000899479,0.00005125742,0.001568711,0.0058895126,0.000002705858,0.000046917332,0.000052414074,0.99201363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923265,0.000008217853,0.00021557543,0.00024116662,0.0001434182,0.00015897669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992646,0.000054587836,0.00011558337,0.00032858798,0.0001854676,0.00005115992],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012462509,0.00022971428,0.00031188945,0.00006174441,0.00018767394,0.00007950426,0.00016789687,0.00024816056,0.10364786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007698774,0.00018325918,0.0001936707,0.000001326842,0.0010366497,0.000054631615,0.00004644284,0.00034042023,0.007833189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024182948,0.000004734783,2.46319e-7,0.00002954757,0.00005899828,0.000003253406,0.0043302397,4.492985e-9,2.7762448e-7,0.83598936,0.1590189,0.0005619965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004655417,0.000047270787,1.9200615e-7,0.00002623018,0.00004559603,9.679428e-7,0.0001725946,5.044209e-7,0.0000035772416,0.32762244,0.6718673,0.00016677726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005709772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014097344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5128484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016425929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004635668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99293935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247010926","doi":"10.32920/14753850.v1","title":"Externalism, Memory, and Self-Knowledge","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Externalism; Doctrine; Epistemology; Individuation; Subject (documents); Inclusion (mineral); A priori and a posteriori; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Self-knowledge; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Mathematics; Computer science; Theology","score_opus":0.07167107920821292,"score_gpt":0.290100854881818,"score_spread":0.2184297756736051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247010926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13791241,0.00859649,0.00016516619,0.0008233915,0.006292783,0.00026086136,0.000034626548,0.0003170544,0.8455972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7546521,0.001903039,0.0012484326,0.001484533,0.0051429966,0.000058529287,0.000105449624,0.000076954835,0.23532796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987513,0.00014829561,0.00028161242,0.0004745002,0.00012647593,0.00021781395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989466,0.00013332721,0.0001207153,0.0004478962,0.00026079486,0.000090669186],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031926355,0.0002742763,0.00045539625,0.00006570288,0.00020010179,0.00047573663,0.00021717841,0.00024098279,0.0015613112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023312228,0.00023844295,0.00017635705,0.000009262666,0.0003542554,0.000084178384,0.0006537749,0.0007478357,0.00006708803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004791769,0.00036516896,0.00007906009,0.0015315729,0.00043964002,0.00004765151,0.2727025,0.0000023821617,0.000021356347,0.70989966,0.01144416,0.0034620939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046922403,0.00006203339,0.0002740908,0.00036484277,0.00040121475,0.000018994493,0.017751096,0.00025059487,0.000404558,0.062224086,0.9168011,0.0009781885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085664267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040151384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90535694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024391795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015542899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247478580","doi":"10.1111/phpe.12110","title":"SEMANTIC INDECISION","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Perspectives","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.10235160998711826,"score_gpt":0.3177550435448089,"score_spread":0.21540343355769062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247478580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22561033,0.0008583064,0.0002543986,0.044517037,0.0017107422,0.00023878153,0.000020166135,0.0002805681,0.7265097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888527,0.000031793457,0.00011988252,0.0008838109,0.0084116785,0.0000073873393,0.000002811155,0.000023769077,0.0016662101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880654,0.00008737275,0.00020523237,0.00038125858,0.00026026464,0.00025935253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989589,0.00016776357,0.00006760741,0.0003068519,0.00040142928,0.00009746364],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025472353,0.00016846991,0.00024244316,0.000098889985,0.0004964406,0.000095088646,0.00021798034,0.000096449075,0.0016887271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025268452,0.00013605873,0.00013542875,0.000052440642,0.0023217297,0.00019577901,0.00007406951,0.0003586332,0.0010883103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034810502,0.00014176694,0.000040390798,0.000008979815,0.00003770897,0.0000048585175,0.057756744,1.2013453e-7,0.00011226078,0.94063646,0.0007525981,0.00047331746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026166314,0.0002956061,0.000412254,0.000024016648,0.000029206627,0.000004468538,0.007487802,0.000038923285,0.00011390422,0.9458354,0.045288276,0.00020846438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054953107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012841776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7632423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039025035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003189788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248019717","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/4zq8s","title":"Sustaining rules: a model and application","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Normative; Connection (principal bundle); Normative model of decision-making; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Rule of law; Rule-based system; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Mathematics; Law; Philosophy; Machine learning","score_opus":0.10513269572734638,"score_gpt":0.2962433106957255,"score_spread":0.19111061496837914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248019717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021072458,0.0009110875,0.107338496,0.011135947,0.000623666,0.00092761463,0.00015619608,0.0005437996,0.85729074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98259133,0.0001437594,0.002203722,0.0018483561,0.00090678345,0.00009028527,0.00014287635,0.000030914725,0.012041945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991978,0.000028964007,0.00019442225,0.00034917612,0.00009602848,0.00013362528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994235,0.000053844786,0.00011123189,0.00023148023,0.000120012795,0.00005991915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001570982,0.00016249358,0.0002567244,0.000037276954,0.00016407586,0.00015612834,0.00013787816,0.00014867815,0.000048421858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023388755,0.00014676304,0.00006993613,0.0000055741402,0.00028625003,0.000050622453,0.00031445417,0.0005195902,0.000035247358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004229008,0.000011811492,0.000007805093,0.00032477398,0.000034335724,6.7858e-7,0.045340836,0.00017805706,0.000015589847,0.9515084,0.0009850768,0.0015884131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011548076,0.000018359739,0.000008608317,0.000033510078,0.00007425422,4.5696467e-7,0.008130671,0.0774291,0.000013599589,0.85884964,0.05505731,0.00026899658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003064434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033504926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9615189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001711873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095264004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59848225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248191072","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_394-1","title":"Slippery Slope","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Slippery slope; Bioethics; Argument (complex analysis); Abortion; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Environmental ethics; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Medicine; Law; Family medicine; Pregnancy; Internal medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.0769545466007768,"score_gpt":0.2407107466193551,"score_spread":0.1637562000185783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248191072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000046107866,0.00045190865,0.00007825704,0.00064188655,0.0025255391,0.00012132138,0.00003135493,0.0001477395,0.99599737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012310138,0.00017093628,0.000056888788,0.0033012934,0.004495706,0.000004364418,0.00006514803,0.000072086266,0.99060255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990067,0.0000178398,0.00028777137,0.00029874058,0.00018488955,0.00020404822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990732,0.00013180533,0.00014660026,0.00041341037,0.00016635194,0.000068624584],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020897642,0.0002981321,0.00045671212,0.00008196304,0.00020709798,0.00009812163,0.00020906131,0.0003031944,0.022890035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013058185,0.00023958775,0.00026423993,0.0000016589419,0.0006170707,0.000045992216,0.00006234289,0.0005298072,0.0048026345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002614283,0.000004463352,3.790155e-7,0.000063479114,0.000070400376,0.0000037735215,0.0018720201,7.104156e-8,6.92176e-7,0.90460926,0.08953852,0.0038342972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006774646,0.000044312455,3.7521548e-7,0.000050394377,0.000060648483,0.0000015936077,0.00009055005,0.0000011665608,0.00000296005,0.19967487,0.7997391,0.00026629012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006786607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013495509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71020055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018294002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050459625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248250607","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12654","title":"Evidential Preemption","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Preemption; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Epistemology; Psychology; Empirical evidence; Law and economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.6838566920612632,"score_gpt":0.4103988827310323,"score_spread":0.2734578093302309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248250607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04273439,0.0021212487,0.000062489155,0.056283902,0.00025137202,0.00036976364,0.00004477814,0.00012968286,0.8980024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946563,0.00029685913,0.00004141879,0.0013516382,0.0029462217,0.000028343993,0.000014622352,0.000010390449,0.00065420946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983872,0.00034403536,0.0001879362,0.0003592911,0.0003650574,0.00035643583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906176,0.0003744401,0.00003443801,0.00013654819,0.00018605971,0.00020675572],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006708323,0.000115159084,0.0002007604,0.00005844101,0.0005661628,0.00016047819,0.00022898536,0.00009594205,0.0013523656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035023392,0.000088404326,0.000056987978,0.000070684655,0.0014613232,0.00017263596,0.0002023019,0.00074978464,0.00040275534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098736,0.00006191807,0.000057383044,0.000078463665,0.00002410551,0.000007638828,0.015013989,5.363058e-7,0.000054321168,0.9816507,0.0009234295,0.0020287721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024299057,0.0007530284,0.000039541177,0.00001255933,0.000008906873,8.36946e-7,0.0011390389,0.000046306322,0.0000132496425,0.8375297,0.16009513,0.000118718715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023941651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009071891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9519219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014538632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002504297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248282835","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/zf64s","title":"Reasons and Basing in Commonsense Epistemology: Evidence from Two Experiments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Relation (database); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.2507180676652423,"score_gpt":0.35802207498836974,"score_spread":0.10730400732312745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248282835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9209778,0.009130487,0.00023155463,0.013538379,0.002865863,0.00067261833,0.00019872437,0.00021942057,0.05216521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929701,0.000460924,0.0017431653,0.0016786769,0.00086069433,0.000035792804,0.00007060643,0.000039783405,0.002140273],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977246,0.0005669587,0.0004917378,0.000744446,0.00017848589,0.00029376496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997898,0.0011189274,0.00022797112,0.0005403373,0.0000865957,0.00012818574],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042884875,0.00035760854,0.0007315357,0.000092471324,0.00019454092,0.00023211534,0.00030030764,0.0002495537,0.00037253826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000274488,0.00033840383,0.00012791739,0.000021233333,0.00085487607,0.0001296566,0.0007758812,0.0011692479,0.00005559986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036683126,0.00029130472,0.036562417,0.0009622886,0.0006004616,0.0005955229,0.4900743,0.000042142143,0.0013721989,0.4542624,0.010852527,0.004017568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004373133,0.0005177527,0.01846594,0.010555937,0.0008819862,0.000046086825,0.07223821,0.003913642,0.0031407466,0.7741174,0.10699114,0.0047580167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027252994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020743335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4178361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006377716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248358268","doi":"10.5558/tfc85341-3","title":"Of Relevance / Question d’information","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Computer science; Information retrieval; Political science","score_opus":0.02662145254103627,"score_gpt":0.2615677472097801,"score_spread":0.23494629466874384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248358268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84516823,0.00077778066,0.00046784984,0.006455652,0.00076720456,0.00026538124,0.000025004701,0.00012321514,0.14594968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99804395,0.000033831395,0.000041398016,0.00043691506,0.0002508708,0.00000238905,0.000010616861,0.000002864071,0.0011771355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995431,0.00003195886,0.00016568539,0.00004685181,0.000099865945,0.000112593756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955434,0.000051202853,0.00011110638,0.00019236437,0.00007558101,0.000015397109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022570234,0.000056637095,0.00008188811,0.00001541476,0.00014355806,0.000026036521,0.00012592698,0.000031489046,0.00007645572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041694922,0.000038603495,0.000044397555,0.000019257077,0.00024032177,0.0003364442,0.0000097443135,0.000119472475,0.000057649166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013230362,0.00002050242,0.000025225912,0.000021434214,0.0000057396783,1.4778901e-7,0.008070196,0.0000994749,0.000099887395,0.9834076,0.0018762004,0.0063603697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007224457,0.0005659998,0.0064733024,0.0000902368,0.000052268504,0.0000062852278,0.0025289648,0.0015045826,0.005165541,0.40021667,0.58243513,0.00023856331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000908808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010384472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5831909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021843744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036056463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15742049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248547016","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498879.003","title":"Cogency","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Persuasion; Epistemology; Philosophy; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.055576789089679945,"score_gpt":0.20531267081251975,"score_spread":0.1497358817228398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248547016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000045742774,0.00031408542,0.00005611442,0.000025796127,0.0010644855,0.00026688963,0.0006787308,0.00018084777,0.9973673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00087270746,0.00006565112,0.000015916636,0.00014768133,0.0011041305,5.06392e-7,0.00016158984,0.000057916222,0.9975739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881583,0.00003884136,0.0002091102,0.00042857716,0.0002242665,0.00028337433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988273,0.000077425226,0.0002469505,0.00047767037,0.00026831275,0.00010233947],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000929098,0.000373798,0.00045239058,0.00013626799,0.00043023634,0.00007152943,0.00040919398,0.00035342944,0.00005821257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000043284667,0.00042798193,0.00034284228,0.0000015615296,0.0010656394,0.00008342027,0.0001742194,0.00063484616,0.000095940784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016134145,0.000009206028,3.6467628e-7,0.00008448908,0.00010600942,0.0001261549,0.00042238302,3.759244e-7,0.0000031781499,0.7840531,0.2149141,0.00026449308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028288848,0.000044225395,0.0000014924004,0.000086343054,0.0003141459,0.000004142078,0.000117930686,0.0000035451792,0.000031322732,0.0003430872,0.9983094,0.00046150744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008296428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009263695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009541649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010051165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249581682","doi":"10.5558/tfc86299-3","title":"Of Relevance / Question d’Information","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Information retrieval; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.022516154748655162,"score_gpt":0.2569581286496641,"score_spread":0.23444197390100896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249581682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94196314,0.00009327646,0.00010451487,0.0014412979,0.0011817291,0.00012243443,0.000017945307,0.000052708205,0.055022955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980683,0.000012851038,0.00006407689,0.00015642581,0.00038459324,0.0000060248703,0.00001083714,0.000004838245,0.001292099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956393,0.000024257419,0.00015754366,0.00004777849,0.000097014316,0.0001094519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994584,0.000081254366,0.00011460557,0.00023599772,0.000092304275,0.000017445314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029048664,0.00005551953,0.00007509534,0.000014902869,0.00015974611,0.00002884923,0.00014758889,0.000043090506,0.00020205323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074081,0.000037426096,0.000042555715,0.000016266209,0.00048389527,0.00032557116,0.00002125283,0.0002440557,0.00008756286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008497416,0.000015219872,0.000102796614,0.000035363744,0.000007160614,9.90257e-8,0.007238625,0.000022226117,0.00065295474,0.98823625,0.0012512164,0.0024295722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004494964,0.0001395024,0.0029314626,0.00003076164,0.000034508892,0.0000058627697,0.0016138173,0.0010060907,0.008193045,0.13820247,0.8472304,0.0001626001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023837303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010512781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8500338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009654935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047045178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22123411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250997771","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/97ycz","title":"Iffy Predictions and Proper Expectations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Successor cardinal; sort; Epistemology; Process (computing); Connection (principal bundle); Speech act; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1387050347070976,"score_gpt":0.28861274006475873,"score_spread":0.14990770535766113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250997771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060328795,0.0009056251,0.0014274598,0.013225754,0.0026611674,0.00059021544,0.00024377134,0.00041296793,0.9745002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92463356,0.00015453267,0.00086905493,0.0011187176,0.0025353334,0.00019082101,0.00016347662,0.0000369989,0.0702975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919367,0.000053705473,0.00020665376,0.0003166046,0.00010740248,0.00012194963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942684,0.00006315757,0.0000754628,0.00021360246,0.00014460192,0.000076345124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000057976686,0.00016083274,0.00022610232,0.000049776485,0.00031574498,0.00019378797,0.00011080742,0.00012710367,0.0007405765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044964003,0.0001295329,0.00008965243,0.000010677393,0.00045665534,0.00007008451,0.00021547209,0.00059553306,0.000109109016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030252008,0.00004032107,0.00003790753,0.0001693172,0.00011386542,0.0000019655406,0.104931496,0.0000069735606,0.000008297397,0.8744881,0.019946761,0.00025194022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002951077,0.00011938277,0.00034128333,0.00011289481,0.00031857658,0.0000038192775,0.047189634,0.00091923174,0.000050945426,0.22791319,0.7221654,0.00057052256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002966516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010927047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9186007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012406147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009557026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8108793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251201465","doi":"10.2478/disp-2010-0001","title":"Epistemology neutralized","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disputatio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Counterintuitive; Skepticism; Epistemology; Normative; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Analytic philosophy; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Contemporary philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03984698466051083,"score_gpt":0.28098708453989657,"score_spread":0.24114009987938573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251201465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65656245,0.000055434477,0.00013622189,0.002335685,0.00468136,0.00015793173,0.000032185188,0.0001495373,0.3358892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98004436,0.0000036287527,0.00026674845,0.0012957109,0.0007878137,0.000021705104,0.000044456767,0.000019526637,0.017516034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992487,0.000059810507,0.00019856977,0.00018269043,0.00009150524,0.00021876581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993744,0.00016313861,0.00007996593,0.00020414923,0.0001146833,0.000063643725],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018970443,0.000114381815,0.00018444391,0.00004776735,0.00022707321,0.00007384395,0.00014455857,0.00008261012,0.0014664445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006774088,0.00009989265,0.00009560962,0.000020749463,0.00061233237,0.00012177515,0.000019446752,0.00034036112,0.0005200654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007947707,0.000042709627,0.0004640363,0.000023223838,0.000022316444,0.0000069930907,0.015959095,0.0000015726678,0.0006216905,0.9792762,0.0022251946,0.0013490488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051479245,0.000065476146,0.0027973524,0.000005769898,0.00004459465,0.000009319262,0.0016797644,0.000063726264,0.00031638137,0.15647359,0.8377733,0.0002558735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002519823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003084633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83554816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005028518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037190268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251883786","doi":"10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.52","title":"Masking Disagreement among Experts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Credibility; Masking (illustration); Position (finance); Focus (optics); Politics; Scientific consensus; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Business; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03783743041043254,"score_gpt":0.23319073510138663,"score_spread":0.19535330469095408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251883786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22776859,0.0006317482,0.00061647524,0.0012695338,0.0023659805,0.00024819144,0.000017339005,0.00019447877,0.76688766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9071034,0.000006300648,0.00006988525,0.0003390455,0.002072445,0.000029280367,0.000029431923,0.00002360853,0.09032658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988207,0.000075172946,0.00032121252,0.00024933083,0.00022069804,0.0003128455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993865,0.00008118763,0.00012252959,0.00028771695,0.00007234778,0.00004972843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002577382,0.00016689803,0.00022035824,0.00005123383,0.00036603265,0.00013250085,0.00015959537,0.000058887872,0.00083854096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014659242,0.0001445007,0.00013084913,0.000022065835,0.0005258706,0.00018468195,0.000047017995,0.00012686763,0.00016736316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006844026,0.00013830703,0.006387857,0.00008399343,0.000040372346,0.000026137448,0.015506974,0.00003041215,0.00011284351,0.9386019,0.038191658,0.000872696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035963595,0.00005810699,0.0038475362,0.00007280217,0.000035001634,0.000002366943,0.0038343219,0.00014233796,0.0003333788,0.03539345,0.9555529,0.0003681924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018673195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006224301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9173612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044377153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016801285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9181436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252252122","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_100010","title":"Adversarial Knowledge","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1037802495597827,"score_gpt":0.273553490365412,"score_spread":0.16977324080562928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252252122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000537558,0.00048568804,0.00001877975,0.0001423099,0.0069812383,0.00014514952,0.00006229819,0.00013744031,0.99202174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00044991786,0.00007385835,0.000045580717,0.00048468667,0.015351309,0.0000033804504,0.00006469598,0.00006112598,0.98346543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990729,0.000017099193,0.0002682531,0.0003092467,0.0001329292,0.00019955207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903536,0.000106669184,0.00013344313,0.00035307795,0.0003032733,0.000068204645],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017811131,0.00029086915,0.00039187336,0.00008596408,0.00023782358,0.00007616968,0.00021615333,0.00035017973,0.06823007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013962825,0.00024154561,0.0002668225,0.0000022359468,0.0011825862,0.00007310295,0.00008628688,0.00042571366,0.012975161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070689002,0.000011187239,8.342473e-8,0.00003863848,0.000090781956,0.0000024896472,0.010170951,6.1585785e-9,4.0230918e-7,0.7794246,0.20955807,0.0006956822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001321142,0.00007559383,1.06470985e-7,0.0000431729,0.00008776196,8.6246615e-7,0.0001999709,0.0000010701596,0.000004253078,0.251395,0.747824,0.00023611984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058922393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035158908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53826594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031198582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011771984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9877933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252625169","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3643920","title":"Irksome Assertion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.04889217102827129,"score_gpt":0.25109852115688347,"score_spread":0.20220635012861218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252625169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69354457,0.012641173,0.010872739,0.08532352,0.004247259,0.00043064822,0.000016689373,0.00044322188,0.19248019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880938,0.00095507456,0.000016861279,0.0019537685,0.0030370518,0.0000020107216,0.0000045256184,0.000019774987,0.0059171594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830896,0.00008598158,0.00021253286,0.00013457726,0.00017129858,0.0010866502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995675,0.000034664998,0.00011920954,0.00007877235,0.00010895753,0.00009090075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066966325,0.0001108792,0.00015998927,0.000035452627,0.00035212832,0.00010765672,0.00018120214,0.00005229377,0.00023449791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062041254,0.00009367259,0.00012989342,0.000029903451,0.000117511685,0.00024665333,0.000017676604,0.001841013,0.00023168504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002196542,0.000024106204,0.000089377994,0.000008098417,0.00008456128,0.0000024322171,0.0073096575,0.0000039063516,0.00020651374,0.98790324,0.00064860715,0.0036975485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051064696,0.00057974085,0.000058378406,0.000010876916,0.000065877284,0.00006096991,0.014912462,0.0000759631,0.000105897256,0.6902318,0.29316926,0.00021814217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042126834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011142765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29767144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014539332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006243248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7998388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252732268","doi":"10.1016/s1499-2671(14)00544-9","title":"Duality/Conflict of Interest","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Diabetes","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Duality (order theory); Pure mathematics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13694773711238684,"score_gpt":0.26708957414146517,"score_spread":0.13014183702907833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252732268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96531045,0.00068780116,0.0000060452285,0.0010788885,0.0012956795,0.000029074752,0.000026116262,0.000003331741,0.031562634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755466,0.0000033232477,0.000029446912,0.0006385803,0.0007978829,4.2483688e-7,0.000001776003,0.000010412324,0.00096352043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999224,0.00010426988,0.00034134832,0.00005984207,0.00006189737,0.00020861735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988308,0.0001916782,0.00026904934,0.00012463877,0.00031892076,0.00026489337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006027871,0.00008217574,0.00027867872,0.00016498676,0.00009920073,0.00005317206,0.0001993864,0.00004632514,0.00040737365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030423942,0.00006942253,0.00013229944,0.000021118542,0.0005121174,0.00011640614,0.000005923988,0.00021937453,0.0000144036985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020440223,0.000029800041,0.034136266,0.0001773252,0.0002271753,0.0000042827073,0.03359482,0.0000047939743,0.00037323576,0.9119538,0.013417982,0.006078454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003976159,0.00044868194,0.0068488847,0.00022741995,0.00009382581,0.0000019681058,0.0024514794,0.00001497879,0.001770823,0.03489317,0.9526538,0.0001973356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011202344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07602905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9392358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002161578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024301164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.940831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253128174","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12253","title":"Sensitivity Actually","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sensitivity (control systems); Lottery; Appeal; Epistemology; Modal; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6236328143476552,"score_gpt":0.41096779576559506,"score_spread":0.2126650185820601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253128174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060016893,0.00076104107,0.000024015422,0.008815091,0.0002518432,0.00019144813,0.00002478939,0.00008157188,0.9298333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951027,0.00009272342,0.00008159993,0.0006397913,0.0015739241,0.000018981958,0.0000103101665,0.000011829257,0.0024681229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781334,0.00070736324,0.00017536605,0.00035485678,0.00046479836,0.000484285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805695,0.0008989955,0.0000345568,0.00023920236,0.0004682189,0.00030206217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002854694,0.00014093438,0.00025287454,0.000109789406,0.0005006667,0.0001510754,0.00015492935,0.00012066275,0.00024529546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073625176,0.00010331064,0.000048391794,0.00007001665,0.002375314,0.00016286974,0.00023361164,0.0008361183,0.00033547552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000802399,0.00013008485,0.00006715463,0.000023370802,0.00002487524,0.000030799398,0.020224132,7.77631e-7,0.000018892702,0.97629505,0.00087161333,0.0022330172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028023828,0.00051992934,0.000036720638,0.000008932963,0.0000057289294,0.000004748454,0.0034700132,0.000020590522,0.000008351168,0.87762016,0.117894135,0.00013045488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010576752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007371702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93508583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003795235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007661755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8751944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253941914","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9205.2006.00304.x","title":"Index for 2006","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Performance studies; Library science; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.12113738370492089,"score_gpt":0.28897972467894006,"score_spread":0.16784234097401918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253941914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05631695,0.000515996,0.004984099,0.3014151,0.00244948,0.0012295507,0.00082471006,0.0006420294,0.6316221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845705,0.0000020205612,0.00090444076,0.0034626173,0.004844658,0.00013656524,0.0001851942,0.000024962454,0.0058690542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999112,0.0000417792,0.000280599,0.00021004296,0.00013553281,0.00022006461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991623,0.00026434506,0.00008176344,0.00019579488,0.00020692845,0.000088850335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016070287,0.00012858275,0.00016779969,0.0000707198,0.0005140779,0.000088143985,0.00013417787,0.00009595459,0.0001532919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014503517,0.00011930503,0.000119987206,0.00004487059,0.0011622831,0.00015417166,0.000020487012,0.00021832176,0.000098467164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003797667,0.00007047972,0.00030130032,0.00002440246,0.000013420311,5.105578e-7,0.0005730352,0.00003990697,0.00006271234,0.98579186,0.013077111,0.00004147747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018912755,0.000038012207,0.00021189277,0.000009471557,0.000028223114,7.2093184e-7,0.000043567903,0.00030447185,0.000072732415,0.7845196,0.21445924,0.00012295529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028649135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010007183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92825353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001772016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005854206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48651177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254036064","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i4.5001","title":"From the Editors","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Informal logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.10014445378068881,"score_gpt":0.2894497823457241,"score_spread":0.1893053285650353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254036064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06503132,0.000076849894,0.000016601984,0.006285133,0.015274735,0.00009770028,0.000061888095,0.0000632228,0.91309255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9467193,0.0000118408925,0.000033809236,0.0029856008,0.038966738,0.000007778056,0.000018571869,0.0000061964383,0.011250154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950916,0.000015493333,0.00013223576,0.000070744245,0.000111343456,0.00016103302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992163,0.00012591598,0.00013634871,0.00043015505,0.00006254078,0.000028723636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001926357,0.00008105661,0.00010046813,0.000008289779,0.0012217329,0.0003635235,0.0004806786,0.00005492524,0.00060777855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012222421,0.000045277357,0.00007314049,0.000002778725,0.0007412368,0.0004218353,0.00010039284,0.0002153064,0.00064691145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011814139,0.000015849055,0.0009780674,0.000007107553,0.000038799688,0.00000398866,0.039024595,0.0000021096344,0.0000046072296,0.8316834,0.12438374,0.00384595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011132661,0.0000316491,0.0038862932,0.0000064510714,0.00001309375,4.2919697e-7,0.0024125439,0.000011571089,0.000023498646,0.037780836,0.9556438,0.00007851197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015504864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064918323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9018424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004520918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023161128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93967056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254815433","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_110144","title":"Adversarial Knowledge","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08290938162915383,"score_gpt":0.25862726399513714,"score_spread":0.1757178823659833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254815433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000015330866,0.00045405672,0.00010733451,0.00021586714,0.00560824,0.00013537573,0.000035785437,0.00013850344,0.9933033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014383076,0.00006780184,0.00003451607,0.00066342315,0.010047534,0.0000037518969,0.00006819386,0.00006268919,0.9876138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990788,0.000023126468,0.00027748727,0.0002956248,0.0001322371,0.00019274357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906933,0.00016495296,0.00014133248,0.00035235233,0.00020154151,0.00007050647],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021182149,0.00029470216,0.00045171328,0.00008440826,0.00020785202,0.00007129203,0.00020867337,0.00034338413,0.016236464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001622151,0.00024556118,0.00029165516,0.0000017977148,0.0006657812,0.000041071064,0.00007104397,0.00051569013,0.006324354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005634795,0.000008044276,1.238164e-7,0.00006199227,0.00008334669,0.0000018832213,0.004211209,5.2527316e-8,4.0403785e-7,0.88912255,0.103718966,0.0027858168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015897707,0.000054997534,1.4120204e-7,0.000044148986,0.00009448235,8.0070345e-7,0.000078913705,0.0000028278464,0.0000023437178,0.19009306,0.80920804,0.00026127248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007063517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026574961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7054891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026596055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008468006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255351806","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_100147","title":"Trust","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.08105420561333207,"score_gpt":0.2435173219063202,"score_spread":0.16246311629298812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255351806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000030998551,0.0002470217,0.00006496338,0.00045637198,0.0017747477,0.000094292474,0.000028859728,0.00011727724,0.99721336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009678483,0.00008188267,0.000038047532,0.0021737397,0.0037404918,0.0000030091592,0.000049428763,0.000053630472,0.9928919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923944,0.000011300838,0.0002234057,0.00022998148,0.00014263045,0.00015326247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992893,0.000086463166,0.00012279932,0.00032787336,0.00012058636,0.00005298615],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014967736,0.00023291032,0.00036229021,0.000060580405,0.00016279127,0.00007415755,0.00016179524,0.0002430916,0.023529407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009019836,0.0001864737,0.00021273502,0.0000010540952,0.0005655417,0.000029773282,0.000037840942,0.00041678245,0.003667633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018438571,0.0000032381631,3.6217688e-7,0.000047054804,0.000052177103,0.000002347683,0.0016472815,4.165396e-8,2.70127e-7,0.9270403,0.0688609,0.0023442197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056958437,0.000034011737,2.605644e-7,0.000027024893,0.00004960845,9.006627e-7,0.00006526354,0.0000014148995,0.0000019238219,0.2644593,0.73511654,0.00018679879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006905822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001049072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66625565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013874301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032752145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255821334","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/kwx2n","title":"A New Paradigm for Epistemology: From Reliabilism to Abilism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Epistemology; Nothing; Counterfactual conditional; Luck; Relation (database); Philosophy; Commonsense knowledge; Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Body of knowledge","score_opus":0.12027528428523938,"score_gpt":0.30668919556904667,"score_spread":0.1864139112838073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255821334","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026565323,0.0027612543,0.09512427,0.45232671,0.04701817,0.01024423,0.004342545,0.0022281066,0.3593894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.350554,0.00028655157,0.12842357,0.09222013,0.06258074,0.0024816033,0.0035509327,0.0007699624,0.3591325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970916,0.0001547892,0.00076104666,0.0012540673,0.00023685524,0.0005016241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970023,0.0010148319,0.0002776483,0.0010641078,0.00020650926,0.0004346133],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003716839,0.0005608309,0.0011557165,0.000101477526,0.0002564686,0.00029065507,0.00081986526,0.00060643035,0.0016888173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039223424,0.0005040453,0.00062728673,0.000027801821,0.00033900733,0.00008063281,0.00063138857,0.0010371164,0.00058206567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007007933,0.000041704978,0.000016296859,0.0002471094,0.00019623371,0.000005336502,0.041294876,0.00002714446,0.000024304756,0.7443764,0.21222557,0.0014749315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002556863,0.000110274705,0.00003062493,0.000057996247,0.00012651578,4.5109445e-7,0.0006009227,0.000048417223,0.000051162537,0.5021688,0.49618623,0.00036293734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009620868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057030767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3601066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087617096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005102338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255917206","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198847205.003.0004","title":"Losing Knowledge by Thinking about Thinking","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06639461169239262,"score_gpt":0.2695674433269028,"score_spread":0.20317283163451016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255917206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016519938,0.018587636,0.00018740105,0.00059645093,0.00356323,0.00017505433,0.00006585443,0.0002734241,0.9765344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00072905835,0.00075513776,0.00029871654,0.0027140996,0.0034480144,0.000005253316,0.00029307487,0.00014885396,0.9916078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979489,0.000061949744,0.00055905315,0.0006177418,0.0004031313,0.0004092244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831396,0.0003311614,0.00032117643,0.0005233255,0.00041612296,0.000094248564],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005709935,0.0005495123,0.0007706767,0.00012442781,0.0010189802,0.0006578357,0.00044220133,0.0005476498,0.009700813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029194198,0.0005001192,0.00045062095,0.000009446419,0.0006414724,0.00020129445,0.00025078058,0.0013415804,0.0006562739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002290567,0.000025134083,0.000001047091,0.00019036677,0.00020169585,0.000022936674,0.030933842,1.8871397e-7,0.000010775964,0.9019379,0.064514466,0.002159327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106903564,0.000022305569,1.5363331e-7,0.00063207187,0.00012856806,0.0000047529084,0.00086959155,0.000004173062,0.000044029694,0.28002056,0.7177195,0.00044737878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012598102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021106184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65320504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090230285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018007487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256219179","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/p9r7d","title":"Reasons, Answers and Goals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Positive economics; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.11322331642770474,"score_gpt":0.2883748825209712,"score_spread":0.1751515660932665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256219179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015886804,0.0024416412,0.00016606324,0.018480843,0.002847101,0.00039034916,0.00018658118,0.00031912493,0.9592815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87281734,0.0017286827,0.0013121093,0.009334429,0.004061532,0.000051822,0.0002076337,0.00007947631,0.110406965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902636,0.00008001707,0.00021129982,0.0003910699,0.00012283248,0.000168434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993132,0.00010861528,0.00010742847,0.000282407,0.00008609445,0.00010230469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019046104,0.00021272477,0.00037991055,0.000037510006,0.00015039394,0.0002093382,0.0001705275,0.00018995149,0.00072265195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062555475,0.00018049392,0.00011842936,0.0000073548435,0.00050469954,0.000051449915,0.000325254,0.00067789335,0.000100026606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072350094,0.000017897048,0.00010697978,0.0003142122,0.00011044065,0.000007656016,0.022158418,7.980472e-7,0.000008979224,0.9317306,0.04407404,0.0014627032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013237626,0.00004374825,0.00010754078,0.00007535505,0.000105347965,0.0000013942541,0.004560912,0.00003916266,0.000035657977,0.182449,0.8121172,0.0003323102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007976666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009796271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85693055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000118198295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077777586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7912532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281694601","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i2.7005","title":"Deeper into Argumentative Bullshit","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Utterance; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05870631369202928,"score_gpt":0.2732412752028867,"score_spread":0.21453496151085744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281694601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1744648,0.00025691718,0.00008330591,0.0012704015,0.0019056001,0.00023168573,0.000056517034,0.0001359147,0.82159483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96673906,0.000010610353,0.0002179935,0.00787477,0.00036313926,0.000083803134,0.0000617226,0.000010694238,0.024638189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991963,0.000058120837,0.00021069509,0.000110426,0.00020081853,0.00022366272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995957,0.00007150023,0.00009553315,0.00013201755,0.00006178937,0.000043452445],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027686963,0.000108965054,0.00014169606,0.00005956026,0.0008229192,0.00006477626,0.00020047811,0.00002670163,0.006936005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002009751,0.00009385877,0.00008577644,0.000030089495,0.0003045605,0.00026313934,0.00016921705,0.0003470561,0.00040221369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021538926,0.000040382893,0.00013545579,0.00001615634,0.000029911385,0.000007918144,0.10799755,0.000060974635,0.000010251832,0.88721335,0.0029026484,0.0015638568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002529883,0.0002926375,0.00013252447,0.0000019441866,0.000016368305,0.000006263309,0.032370854,0.00001979155,0.00006196041,0.07342765,0.89325386,0.000163142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028113238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025893646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89035124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042283467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043446395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99397177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281721018","doi":"10.1007/s10670-022-00571-5","title":"Imperfection, Accuracy, and Structural Rationality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Rationality; Irrational number; Deliberation; Imperfect; Obligation; Worry; Irrationality; Epistemology; Ecological rationality; Positive economics; Economics; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0437841269974259,"score_gpt":0.2709830557930916,"score_spread":0.22719892879566572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281721018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9614383,0.0004847962,0.000024027573,0.0023536629,0.0021549733,0.00015852904,0.0001361642,0.00008832985,0.03316122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99103224,0.000011624951,0.000031358577,0.00087320386,0.0006092377,0.000028486898,0.000048053786,0.000008924245,0.0073568877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993016,0.0001326859,0.00013653305,0.00016222162,0.00014400123,0.00012295597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955493,0.00015300917,0.00006638818,0.00012773684,0.000063100124,0.00003485611],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002765298,0.000080372236,0.000107598054,0.00003113325,0.0012037397,0.00007716767,0.000079873585,0.000018444936,0.003521079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005326814,0.00007513879,0.00004696369,0.000021707072,0.00024329493,0.00015111346,0.00008485652,0.00022989846,0.000013982278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002566618,0.000028156774,0.00279345,0.000030061492,0.000054364045,0.0000033736599,0.03641457,0.000020008456,0.00021730148,0.94268805,0.015147516,0.0025774734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031055667,0.00010534686,0.007018398,0.0000018842385,0.000028314933,0.00002227159,0.005466309,0.00017740436,0.0000817793,0.078003116,0.9085937,0.00019092631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004477875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048464222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8934462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027400081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003831494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99738985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282937470","doi":"10.1017/s0953820822000139","title":"Clifford's Consequentialism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Argument (complex analysis); Proposition; Counterexample; Consequentialism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.08721855486844853,"score_gpt":0.2675061887832756,"score_spread":0.18028763391482705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282937470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18736501,0.00158505,0.000030179506,0.0041975677,0.006838063,0.00028707247,0.00041513646,0.00024867008,0.7990333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9598631,0.00000733484,0.000035154662,0.0025045478,0.00047192688,0.000040741237,0.00005482558,0.0000148625295,0.037007477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991184,0.00015225094,0.00017315931,0.00017371438,0.00017895944,0.00020353588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951065,0.00010314699,0.00005449142,0.00023581015,0.000053086085,0.000042821965],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037938275,0.000089392226,0.0001418109,0.000045848992,0.0007729036,0.000042535055,0.00017146903,0.000022229427,0.012664438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031366686,0.00008845227,0.000107189284,0.000022028178,0.00048338962,0.00006490779,0.00010774974,0.0002790102,0.00016947504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012731408,0.000055939934,0.00005401483,0.000014174555,0.00003263023,0.000015572114,0.022303874,0.0000022446102,0.00002823967,0.93383086,0.042863816,0.0007859144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016671223,0.00007395998,0.000029254295,0.0000018118192,0.000023396036,0.0000070923475,0.008445852,0.000017288005,0.000033483702,0.06780052,0.92329925,0.000101396705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000473019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028979642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8804354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030890882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005578368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9882381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283396670","doi":"10.3765/sp.15.6","title":"Keep only strong","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semantics and Pragmatics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Meaning (existential); Inference; Operator (biology); Scope (computer science); French horn; Linguistics; Extension (predicate logic); Computer science; Mathematics; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04381410208818345,"score_gpt":0.25551493596452984,"score_spread":0.2117008338763464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283396670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5955499,0.002492805,0.0013431013,0.008855183,0.005150703,0.00069130614,0.000353219,0.0002527628,0.38531104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98417634,0.00009883011,0.0005295391,0.0009466802,0.00042932713,0.00001142788,0.000036442827,0.00002617064,0.013745256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990841,0.00010433474,0.00022920282,0.00015190247,0.00021771606,0.00021269922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940234,0.00015874638,0.00011721834,0.0002063122,0.000060636117,0.00005472042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004218696,0.000121829304,0.00020024959,0.00005382977,0.0009248955,0.00011969719,0.00013616307,0.000029299295,0.00060654496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003168021,0.00011650521,0.00005640215,0.000028053611,0.0002683908,0.00007627554,0.00015608985,0.0003469477,0.000018486518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042849206,0.00006523776,0.00026329624,0.00010086897,0.000043166714,0.0000072505777,0.024952848,0.000025943536,0.000009117548,0.9701605,0.0023613854,0.0020061107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032080844,0.00021023725,0.00011167012,0.000015593569,0.0000995438,0.00002333479,0.01960872,0.0023602599,0.000013274235,0.10989589,0.86706424,0.00027645443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060118866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028809637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8647028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014213525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054062068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7113642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283800421","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21485","title":"Toward a New Science of Common Sense","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Common sense; Commonsense knowledge; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Common knowledge (logic); Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; History; Philosophy; Knowledge base","score_opus":0.24207004612749122,"score_gpt":0.32494956778369083,"score_spread":0.0828795216561996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283800421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8108959,0.000057262445,0.00006128155,0.005536029,0.001652508,0.00045858973,0.000041883588,0.000058628328,0.18123788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971308,0.000013728658,0.00009242875,0.0003119571,0.00014982643,0.000012882057,5.8901634e-7,0.0000116126985,0.0022761351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981994,0.00002455961,0.0005030741,0.00031232412,0.0006740761,0.0002865921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984543,0.00010119327,0.0004794296,0.00021263698,0.0006755843,0.00007685544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009323703,0.00015645835,0.0003013267,0.00015168668,0.0006400223,0.000107244756,0.0010359113,0.000031381787,0.0007465046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028428977,0.00012349144,0.00013525045,0.00027996665,0.002396632,0.00020426515,0.00043403855,0.00044599266,0.000024387544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070908995,0.00015000053,0.000031375617,0.000045114113,0.000011081348,3.535469e-7,0.036311593,0.000022226744,0.02002438,0.93716764,0.0004139169,0.0057514217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003647941,0.0004669307,0.000029193174,0.00009004345,0.000036072415,0.000005785192,0.029229896,0.0011491034,0.37584436,0.58879614,0.0040997863,0.00021617484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062417955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007913906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048442827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003171102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.883049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285040605","doi":"10.1108/978-1-80262-849-420221002","title":"Disruptive Knowledge","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario College of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.10964619551919937,"score_gpt":0.28207311104066796,"score_spread":0.1724269155214686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285040605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000030619174,0.0015316069,0.000005708446,0.00029817855,0.0027436947,0.000175123,0.00018007998,0.00013067515,0.9949319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00078158674,0.00024104425,0.000015748232,0.000563658,0.002028938,0.000018544231,0.00014175852,0.00007025518,0.99613845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990536,0.00002871078,0.00024710546,0.00032141182,0.00016262462,0.00018653063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917877,0.00017585226,0.00013424786,0.00031868418,0.00013478727,0.00005768577],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016899125,0.00028203073,0.00039424753,0.000095564996,0.000420677,0.000058328413,0.00022186831,0.0001485661,0.1058946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009210777,0.0002446312,0.00028928195,0.0000034357568,0.00062725676,0.00007786969,0.00017099918,0.0007820082,0.002057842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000454136,0.00002194233,2.2239146e-7,0.000048531514,0.00011720875,0.000009940136,0.022019565,7.1052995e-8,2.3115354e-7,0.9336651,0.04244106,0.001671605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007134922,0.00007130531,2.85758e-7,0.000018258557,0.00007582011,0.0000015034144,0.0008978289,8.441502e-7,9.978171e-7,0.20888346,0.7897232,0.00025511265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009808636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021871252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7472822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063830055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009682553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99871916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285040609","doi":"10.1108/978-1-80262-849-420221015","title":"The Contemplative Interval","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario College of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Contemplation; Interval (graph theory); Philosophy; Mathematics; Theology; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.1264093919640708,"score_gpt":0.2722454603359333,"score_spread":0.14583606837186247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285040609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000028580594,0.00092284055,0.0000073160004,0.0016304955,0.002859436,0.00018501276,0.00010423918,0.00006794835,0.99421984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016085315,0.0002277811,0.000005124803,0.0012355368,0.0010651071,0.000017858541,0.000045891553,0.00004024286,0.99575394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991338,0.00004379531,0.0002641401,0.00020591087,0.00019845238,0.0001539009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988296,0.0005408153,0.00017978944,0.00028973384,0.00012824562,0.000031783904],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003075154,0.00021038737,0.0002845144,0.000033511773,0.00090371317,0.00011751461,0.0002821796,0.00008965915,0.02324134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001887249,0.00013119093,0.0002577164,0.0000018911188,0.001002412,0.000062488354,0.00014988927,0.0008010974,0.0004047904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011386183,0.000004344027,1.7486133e-7,0.0000108442955,0.00016716681,0.00000531874,0.010221889,5.275119e-8,1.1752559e-7,0.935622,0.05249514,0.0014616034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059352624,0.00007143155,2.0307537e-7,0.000012807409,0.000035412144,0.0000013373942,0.0017769509,9.4990133e-7,7.826454e-7,0.26919582,0.7287153,0.0001296506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018587978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004469457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6762201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041367417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058166246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97765154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285093258","doi":"10.1007/s11229-022-03784-x","title":"A normative comparison of threshold views through computer simulations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Normative; Action (physics); Philosophy of language; Strengths and weaknesses; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Threshold model; Simple (philosophy); Epistemology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy of science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Metaphysics; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Machine learning; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1899978752220474,"score_gpt":0.3498660922149744,"score_spread":0.159868216992927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285093258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65659785,0.0013979138,0.003410925,0.0023271155,0.0034386406,0.0009000178,0.0008601909,0.00018706659,0.33088028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975183,0.0000032751036,0.00042567315,0.00042846182,0.00025360988,0.000020669666,0.000026146168,0.000011996949,0.0013118575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907374,0.00016156165,0.0003081295,0.00012915231,0.00019043042,0.00013699167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991299,0.00035925148,0.00017993868,0.0002270738,0.00008325321,0.000020571475],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019922353,0.000098579265,0.00029001583,0.00004303053,0.00044344238,0.000022953442,0.00017738395,0.000022389058,0.0018514843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018641296,0.00008728334,0.00010843973,0.000039083632,0.00032538833,0.0001369471,0.00011504955,0.00025508757,0.000036944482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019250232,0.00037821394,0.00055520446,0.00006354511,0.00008809932,0.0000013703511,0.34810042,0.004183013,0.00010422046,0.6385244,0.0070579695,0.00092429324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033053453,0.00030099458,0.00010946663,0.0000367357,0.00008224745,0.0000016794444,0.034906127,0.017904311,0.00065873464,0.047665082,0.8977122,0.00029194338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014208317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047034124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89065415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021968715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026446085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285494459","doi":"10.1111/rati.12347","title":"The comparison problem for approximating epistemic ideals","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Worry; Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Bayesian probability; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.08906752553776437,"score_gpt":0.3022916171046589,"score_spread":0.21322409156689454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285494459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09698857,0.01139755,0.030865429,0.062412336,0.0121282395,0.009527013,0.0006419815,0.0010114558,0.7750274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644117,0.000008560853,0.00095499743,0.00069342955,0.0007670979,0.00077360665,0.00006369903,0.000024067453,0.032302853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910074,0.00013300986,0.0003130147,0.00013044641,0.00013870934,0.00018405773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990346,0.00051225314,0.00019307909,0.00016212852,0.000078474746,0.000019492581],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009591375,0.00007805305,0.00015376217,0.000017012482,0.0024414787,0.0001425356,0.0001759107,0.000016873691,0.00009213213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005483921,0.000058179423,0.00007739548,0.000018386803,0.00016149791,0.000062234074,0.000051891828,0.00020426538,0.000012037971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009958871,0.000026942917,0.00004894524,0.000068932364,0.000023610048,1.5334516e-7,0.030833038,0.00012532812,0.00010486218,0.9540819,0.012773619,0.0019027062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002010337,0.00010836056,0.0000053750946,0.0000063470134,0.000021422002,0.0000013461107,0.017130824,0.0037633982,0.0001146077,0.13214222,0.8464012,0.00010387736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006006391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004814398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8674231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003519678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000495255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285663443","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/uagf8","title":"Epistemic situationism and cognitive ability","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Wake Forest University; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Situationism; Virtue; Epistemic virtue; Epistemology; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Experimental philosophy; Social epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Western philosophy","score_opus":0.1199727490701657,"score_gpt":0.3007530126159024,"score_spread":0.18078026354573673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285663443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1859243,0.001611583,0.0026228388,0.022748524,0.0033389628,0.0013335897,0.00057303865,0.00046690795,0.78138024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98951626,0.00009158199,0.0001480014,0.0017828513,0.0010002521,0.000045500125,0.00017838407,0.000021491844,0.007215681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986946,0.00015533925,0.0003175543,0.00051860954,0.00015244848,0.00016142288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988381,0.00039195217,0.00016759378,0.00021998747,0.00029005998,0.000092284885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031087102,0.0002373392,0.00041744154,0.000035257548,0.0002547413,0.0002245251,0.00012788737,0.00021228788,0.00066440867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001994463,0.0002132277,0.00013119256,0.000009395466,0.0010058796,0.00007244932,0.00034966134,0.00081120135,0.00012409365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020677877,0.0000594167,0.00026782657,0.00081897026,0.00020686221,0.0000052124788,0.07163985,9.051138e-7,0.000032442254,0.92243314,0.0013074018,0.0032072822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034728754,0.00007523647,0.00112465,0.00016201561,0.0003139016,0.0000021062126,0.009962849,0.00015939608,0.000109542016,0.96773493,0.019522866,0.00048518725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006645649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011987909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80359197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021730228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012904221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8695173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285663493","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/b3ef9","title":"Knowledge Judgments in \"Gettier\" Cases","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; University of Waterloo; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Epistemology; Ignorance; Categorization; Attribution; Cognition; Philosophy; Psychology; Counterexample; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.26301156984729873,"score_gpt":0.34321796020873047,"score_spread":0.08020639036143173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285663493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022915054,0.0022225985,0.000024616136,0.0023020238,0.0050290106,0.00040322673,0.00012677448,0.00018255325,0.96679413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9140856,0.00013688758,0.00017548022,0.001639643,0.0024115378,0.00007243652,0.00017762765,0.00005001927,0.081250735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986266,0.0001480606,0.0003796679,0.00044205142,0.00015663532,0.00024701218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999128,0.00014905728,0.00011700752,0.00032806906,0.00016957073,0.000108302025],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002905593,0.00027331876,0.0005015895,0.000111637746,0.000082399805,0.00013592921,0.0003051005,0.00022117638,0.00082016055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011930765,0.0002460371,0.00015506547,0.000023689969,0.0003053651,0.00006536492,0.00053768686,0.0009733507,0.00054684933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028217115,0.00032988182,0.0002888111,0.0008711139,0.00014755166,0.00014977618,0.12280823,0.00001712318,0.0000050991084,0.73658514,0.13678919,0.0019798332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000370631,0.00008447824,0.00006236817,0.000172408,0.00006586667,0.0000024483327,0.0066810525,0.00014429931,0.000050529594,0.1540415,0.8378369,0.00048750654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015633076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013749384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89117056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007992553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028633393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286488953","doi":"10.1111/papq.12423","title":"The Cognitive Demands of Friendship","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Doxastic logic; Cognition; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05132110497605342,"score_gpt":0.26061929141733786,"score_spread":0.20929818644128445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286488953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.107805274,0.00087206444,0.00008980185,0.025754238,0.0025942193,0.00042579527,0.0003860739,0.00013259772,0.8619399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99704117,0.0000068590266,0.0000051593756,0.00028062816,0.0008067002,0.00009773829,0.000024356317,0.000020266294,0.001717105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822325,0.00037757348,0.00039318713,0.0002554987,0.0004203351,0.00033016928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834126,0.00093392364,0.00018859105,0.00028360361,0.00016725036,0.00008536106],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008461738,0.00015706333,0.00026357468,0.000056987843,0.0017008276,0.00006379071,0.00030857034,0.000046933368,0.0005694155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067974455,0.00011551961,0.00019070093,0.000066747714,0.0012490008,0.000085177075,0.000043560038,0.0006228508,0.000043106033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010979689,0.00014166701,0.000036790778,0.000018809078,0.000068895475,0.000007412972,0.0451783,4.750253e-7,0.000031107138,0.95154583,0.00046964543,0.002391262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039360343,0.0011578614,0.0000655369,0.00001058889,0.000050096136,0.00000759091,0.04872525,0.0000380508,0.000024597552,0.89366853,0.05568645,0.00017186177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017055245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003290746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8892359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021052356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006264377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294188545","doi":"10.1515/krt-2006-012005","title":"Virtue Foundherentism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Philosophy; Principal (computer security); Computer science","score_opus":0.04667644760325159,"score_gpt":0.25779055139847357,"score_spread":0.21111410379522197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294188545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38152957,0.003820745,0.00094344554,0.011773684,0.012030668,0.000245417,0.000054136795,0.000084336396,0.589518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882787,0.000031836305,0.00027104438,0.0006069504,0.008120355,0.0000014039458,0.0000064949068,0.00002179125,0.0026614587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988134,0.00009463624,0.00054495485,0.000110120796,0.00027445387,0.00016245071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894065,0.000063990854,0.00046008598,0.0001450345,0.00032573348,0.00006451463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033766322,0.00014505058,0.00030303316,0.00015456183,0.00020222283,0.00014589129,0.0002061952,0.00006824254,0.00052360084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018410848,0.00011982267,0.00026644563,0.000030472791,0.00032205446,0.00039786284,0.000025681691,0.0003378817,0.000095585274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003615985,0.00016302236,0.0001278165,0.000048221405,0.00005396265,0.000057866935,0.0016757632,0.0000040731074,0.0013215523,0.9893727,0.006090734,0.0010481508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005455971,0.00025341677,0.00026930976,0.00009600285,0.000050086,0.00006930041,0.000120975834,0.000004695419,0.00021133819,0.6633398,0.33489436,0.00014514815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049388913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006215712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6067491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028151728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037465416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5733062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295993527","doi":"10.5840/tht2022912","title":"A Higher-Order Approach to Diachronic Continence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Temptation; Normative; Order (exchange); Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07426243732536746,"score_gpt":0.2699445828771557,"score_spread":0.19568214555178826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295993527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045947473,0.0071771145,0.00150508,0.030584529,0.008394152,0.0005718722,0.000113231334,0.000094594136,0.90561193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98211056,0.00002682533,0.0012352037,0.0032841603,0.0054397904,0.000021451238,0.000004963312,0.000033868477,0.007843192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983849,0.00024620845,0.0004682649,0.00017331811,0.00046757038,0.00025975987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883825,0.000109091336,0.00038134353,0.000229282,0.00031295573,0.00012910074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007637348,0.00016646896,0.00040162646,0.00017129381,0.0004661764,0.0000651412,0.0004870023,0.00003137574,0.0007995224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004110256,0.00014104828,0.00022170148,0.00013100279,0.00024965467,0.00020122787,0.00014458176,0.00071941223,0.00003661312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100282195,0.00036599408,0.000026155796,0.000047317008,0.000114761664,0.000022450748,0.015733242,0.00017142066,0.00013553508,0.97217196,0.010609918,0.00050096074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007068392,0.000615673,0.000044411125,0.00002532513,0.00008711784,0.00005628938,0.0010315923,0.000023065697,0.000036262707,0.1659725,0.8311731,0.00022782593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016574853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047985027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93616307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074032214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012995927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.875421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297892670","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192856500.001.0001","title":"Pragmatist Quietism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Normative; Objectivity (philosophy); Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.056694142080500526,"score_gpt":0.25188571052549746,"score_spread":0.19519156844499694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297892670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000015145431,0.0007443547,0.000012793834,0.0008097388,0.0036522294,0.000208992,0.00022377314,0.00017477213,0.99417186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000444492,0.00011933264,0.000065015614,0.0029079565,0.002420867,0.000040417828,0.000524796,0.00006568756,0.9938115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880415,0.00007561452,0.00029835347,0.00030210498,0.00030281063,0.00021698662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990656,0.00018876077,0.00019802705,0.00039318769,0.00010132579,0.000053140117],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026586142,0.0002547283,0.00040810026,0.00008347306,0.00048540343,0.00012842179,0.00029518903,0.00016614204,0.13226345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020713618,0.00023118174,0.00021841112,0.000006434191,0.0005577293,0.000083830746,0.00014385619,0.000894819,0.0011306976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010950536,0.000011605642,1.1166872e-7,0.00007432204,0.000045880715,0.000011317632,0.0043851687,1.0875324e-7,1.1682982e-7,0.5394189,0.4556108,0.0004405963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006726288,0.000050674174,4.102157e-7,0.000017388547,0.000056991088,0.000004461612,0.0004202256,8.433176e-7,4.847572e-7,0.2452248,0.7539311,0.00022535677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001442205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015024731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2983203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009797734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032354175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299790271","doi":"10.23943/princeton/9780691154725.001.0001","title":"When Is True Belief Knowledge?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Princeton University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Point (geometry); Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.09073848087924115,"score_gpt":0.23907487922865175,"score_spread":0.1483363983494106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299790271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000047511872,0.0008383563,0.00003316874,0.00007036849,0.0015975652,0.00041997866,0.0002941625,0.0002126586,0.99648625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00044290075,0.00013883309,0.00007391736,0.00026293026,0.002118213,0.0000022331708,0.00007124636,0.00006567096,0.996824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829894,0.00015441628,0.000255936,0.0005188871,0.00026725064,0.0005045616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982428,0.00016592667,0.00032785969,0.0007277947,0.00031783333,0.00021780483],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002504712,0.00046827816,0.00064241537,0.00017665651,0.0005834058,0.000102638835,0.00081177085,0.0005298697,0.0006664798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008795904,0.00051224633,0.0003713315,0.0000037584468,0.001168715,0.0001961226,0.0005482299,0.0010355518,0.00026169795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028037597,0.000054158056,0.0000021302048,0.00035087008,0.00024315261,0.000013677983,0.063203566,6.4046425e-8,0.0000019336983,0.8214706,0.111452624,0.0031791432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004077852,0.000048959817,0.0000020317118,0.00015615416,0.00042768262,0.0000021139551,0.00038788485,0.0000027777583,0.000092380054,0.012656445,0.98525804,0.0005577357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033807076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004560861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8738054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002785611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038961016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301284864","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-01883-1_2","title":"The Notions of Repair and Consistent Answer","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Synthesis lectures on data management","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; History; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.14527470404633736,"score_gpt":0.26083651861006363,"score_spread":0.11556181456372627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301284864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007198861,0.002288459,0.000036896443,0.0008781643,0.00078160723,0.0004619384,0.000872805,0.00007020963,0.99460274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017938918,0.008874343,0.00029437474,0.0012037278,0.0006766898,0.00006490584,0.00028449236,0.000108686094,0.9705539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852,0.000069388254,0.0003978125,0.00053123734,0.0002791654,0.00020240877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99691314,0.0006427402,0.00029931156,0.0020149841,0.000085340296,0.000044488035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005878271,0.00031240136,0.00039619245,0.0001191335,0.00046749058,0.00009220601,0.0006994745,0.00012507013,0.000703517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089983725,0.0002054848,0.00017150467,0.0000065163795,0.0012240547,0.00007118206,0.0004987546,0.00030313674,0.00006310854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029780449,0.000033130535,7.246371e-7,0.00023026875,0.0009750892,0.000008548299,0.0007390232,4.8571695e-7,2.5025108e-7,0.9264682,0.058054585,0.013459908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059230064,0.000055160213,0.00002308713,0.0002237531,0.0007203008,9.647125e-7,0.00022192326,0.0000032174096,0.000011060414,0.06440971,0.9340593,0.00021224121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008919021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016443705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87600476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002004092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020921389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83794266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W43043250","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-2363-4_8","title":"Relevance, Acceptability and Sufficiency Today","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Argumentation library","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Argument (complex analysis); Credibility; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Trustworthiness; Dimension (graph theory); Dialectic; Subject (documents); Psychology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.052937499533605006,"score_gpt":0.24118303897206023,"score_spread":0.18824553943845523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W43043250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011200203,0.0011812752,0.000010729494,0.00044457987,0.0009681373,0.0002616881,0.00011826604,0.00013940874,0.9957559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028342094,0.0012473552,0.0002937169,0.0015420765,0.00070274214,0.000014797627,0.00028156192,0.00006224049,0.96751344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895674,0.000036345955,0.00034146977,0.00036309764,0.00014546824,0.00015684955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992393,0.0001513627,0.00023063569,0.00026755157,0.000041306885,0.00006984601],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010469421,0.00023831263,0.0002742923,0.000088318026,0.0002253586,0.00012536359,0.00014561314,0.00015945507,0.01931735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010953508,0.00022156135,0.00010388312,0.0000073888477,0.00069636706,0.000999629,0.00008566876,0.00031396115,0.0002737855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014916534,0.000025921228,0.00011020288,0.00008769578,0.000034914334,0.0000025530496,0.009617036,3.7212807e-8,0.0000016950497,0.97458833,0.009348375,0.006168342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010761126,0.000076118136,0.00017681006,0.000024403167,0.000041083906,8.804671e-7,0.00028041878,6.3543865e-7,0.00003030213,0.3529531,0.6461245,0.0001841322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024158468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027813881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6367761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000112157295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060465314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9815791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306759524","doi":"10.1007/s13171-022-00295-2","title":"On Resolving Problems with Conditionality and Its Implications for Characterizing Statistical Evidence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sankhya A","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Power Generation; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Statistic; Equivalence (formal languages); Statistical inference; Sufficient statistic; Econometrics; Context (archaeology); Mathematics; Conditionality; Sampling distribution; Ancillary statistic; Statistical hypothesis testing; Statistics; Test statistic; Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.17394126090791692,"score_gpt":0.327869291352021,"score_spread":0.15392803044410405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306759524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91797817,0.0017776141,0.004082162,0.046251204,0.00090821314,0.003059712,0.007928206,0.00027431728,0.01774042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99686486,0.000011271244,0.00018625359,0.001295342,0.00013927116,0.00043467816,0.00012253936,0.000011343485,0.0009344628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937075,0.000072382376,0.00012567431,0.0001955071,0.0000982121,0.00013744169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885213,0.00083741534,0.000073365794,0.00010537777,0.00009507995,0.000036637306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030735802,0.00007230763,0.00011176628,0.000027389104,0.00084814435,0.000057399902,0.00006919454,0.000013760387,0.0003165191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011612064,0.00006274847,0.00002079318,0.000016738148,0.00016290283,0.00011284666,0.000034167646,0.00015893036,0.0000040474747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033362077,0.000039691167,0.00020570293,0.00008942238,0.00001867188,5.92219e-7,0.0041468926,0.000004129536,0.0004508065,0.9936627,0.0011879618,0.0001600677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009361934,0.001682503,0.038414378,0.00026124917,0.00014997959,0.000025643618,0.0026196362,0.00032655898,0.00013735623,0.6886237,0.26627028,0.0005525282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002444463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000087846536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.305039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026837733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052267067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65233266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306764908","doi":"10.1017/epi.2022.35","title":"Curious to Know","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Curiosity; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Metacognition; Psychology; Need to know; Philosophy; Social psychology; Computer science; Cognition","score_opus":0.04914850377599462,"score_gpt":0.2682847627537974,"score_spread":0.2191362589778028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306764908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07901836,0.001385662,0.000087336324,0.02173174,0.00785874,0.000543599,0.0001953545,0.00034402075,0.8888352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78550124,0.0000074302257,0.00008458912,0.0057648076,0.0011072188,0.00011796481,0.00002413069,0.00002955591,0.20736308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989379,0.00014290052,0.00020688972,0.00022752644,0.00022886669,0.00025594103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940765,0.00008477256,0.00006377579,0.00029602402,0.00006341993,0.0000843794],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003976247,0.000114179806,0.0001888202,0.00007488708,0.0007799468,0.000060860606,0.00025844947,0.00002051076,0.004193898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003434138,0.00011421068,0.00010147399,0.00004557486,0.0001540525,0.0000625197,0.000169719,0.00027745595,0.00074589584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012726395,0.00007857026,0.00007029648,0.00002919161,0.000023230275,0.000018483557,0.03499499,0.00002589434,0.00007498681,0.8225959,0.14069161,0.0013841359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013412796,0.00015684137,0.000046621764,0.0000055020337,0.000012732244,0.0000052835826,0.0030476593,0.000009301454,0.000028878043,0.0124108,0.98398453,0.00015769927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027427558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006509374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84329295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060494134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004622529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308450111","doi":"10.1111/phis.12225","title":"On the independence of belief and credence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Issues","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Normative; Independence (probability theory); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10426348735065323,"score_gpt":0.29417144826884245,"score_spread":0.18990796091818923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308450111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66572905,0.003245297,0.0000070387796,0.17851906,0.00082315004,0.00033843712,0.00011920753,0.00007975391,0.151139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99603796,0.00006256876,0.000011069005,0.0020542855,0.00039960496,0.00002380371,0.000002850994,0.000008438254,0.0013994277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990554,0.00016595497,0.00015630374,0.00016661714,0.00033815423,0.00011756628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991341,0.00048664576,0.00007257988,0.00021093662,0.000063663,0.00003204292],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044216725,0.00008758889,0.00015979508,0.00003077283,0.00050520233,0.000028830922,0.00023495522,0.000030155907,0.001397691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014238682,0.000060016766,0.000046181874,0.000027465145,0.00083338056,0.00005153823,0.00015719779,0.00047991073,0.000015644695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018901195,0.00007472456,0.00004495902,0.000016458327,0.000015420404,0.0000034596703,0.012406828,0.0000043338373,0.00006123892,0.98664975,0.0005497877,0.0001541392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007834105,0.00027365013,0.000076807424,0.000012971206,0.000013545482,0.0000022941879,0.001504637,0.000025818663,0.00018064646,0.94996125,0.047789346,0.00008072561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016738893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003492202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3303089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007685881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015324058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308801558","doi":"10.1017/s0266267122000268","title":"Revisiting variable-value population principles","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Japan Securities Scholarship Foundation; Mitsubishi Foundation","keywords":"Axiom; Property (philosophy); Sadistic personality disorder; Class (philosophy); Variable (mathematics); Limit (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Value (mathematics); Population; Focus (optics); Mathematics; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Statistics; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Demography","score_opus":0.07074229758254054,"score_gpt":0.2384464532403738,"score_spread":0.16770415565783325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308801558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5189882,0.0008160352,0.000017403438,0.005160136,0.0016897146,0.00021999641,0.00020965363,0.00006541058,0.47283348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99477863,0.0001111134,0.0003091766,0.0013575937,0.0021407052,0.000019406501,0.000096579985,0.000019196852,0.0011675741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993454,0.00006447306,0.0002275434,0.00019981412,0.000038289454,0.00012446751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958766,0.00007434458,0.00013855446,0.00014205783,0.000018852845,0.000038515736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000402523,0.000094824696,0.0001698001,0.00004915054,0.0007831106,0.00008823033,0.00008861996,0.000023812467,0.00034925208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012286022,0.00010461064,0.000048629463,0.0000127083695,0.00007962409,0.0001226146,0.00010660267,0.0001796756,0.000008942666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073373203,0.000012557486,0.00051984005,0.000028954793,0.000022171134,5.459125e-7,0.0022700639,0.00077842164,0.0000017200432,0.9955592,0.000039879327,0.000759297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012226764,0.000032189626,0.00016766743,0.00000557743,0.000014417029,0.000002959474,0.00020531744,0.0012654569,0.0000013004296,0.58059347,0.4174742,0.000115156356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019296618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001656156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4757905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034763612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019918045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6023133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309806407","doi":"10.3998/phimp.2073","title":"Moral Encroachment under Moral Uncertainty","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophers Imprint","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Intersection (aeronautics); Moral dilemma; Epistemology; Bayesian probability; Modular design; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.14771639008013704,"score_gpt":0.2825632207658839,"score_spread":0.13484683068574688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309806407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2803405,0.00072199275,0.00012969662,0.028890364,0.0067362995,0.0008302434,0.00021500446,0.00053492264,0.681601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901256,0.000008318851,0.00009327242,0.00377124,0.001038431,0.00010958145,0.00004111232,0.000032389686,0.0047800606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983889,0.00017863499,0.00030044751,0.00036307593,0.00038558425,0.00038339838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992238,0.00006428278,0.00012998228,0.00039850976,0.00007160887,0.000111797264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042026668,0.00021610352,0.00026976017,0.00006585205,0.0008377972,0.00008254149,0.00035257015,0.00003956111,0.004627785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012297236,0.00020780278,0.0002006033,0.00004349423,0.00049720495,0.0001054584,0.00032135763,0.0005748769,0.000109187815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033003656,0.00018267217,0.00021324049,0.000020520294,0.00009087338,0.000010861887,0.012269556,0.002573193,0.00007833958,0.98219633,0.0015493566,0.00078207895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006477821,0.0002650237,0.00017436485,0.000005440111,0.00006116931,0.0000088243805,0.010632079,0.0004501525,0.00009533497,0.86711174,0.12015346,0.00039460327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067510054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001310355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7097851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022866068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000907543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311441906","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i4.7165","title":"You Cannot Judge an Argument by its Closure","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Rhetorical question; Dialectic; Closure (psychology); Epistemology; Identity (music); Word (group theory); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.06573458011078719,"score_gpt":0.26390506638099964,"score_spread":0.19817048627021244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311441906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46785513,0.0007878921,0.000011065078,0.0022132637,0.0026408047,0.000343449,0.00069456926,0.00020946912,0.52524436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9519833,0.00001981912,0.00001936563,0.008247982,0.0004510645,0.00006754328,0.00028471055,0.0000137246125,0.038912494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988705,0.000079785044,0.00028881108,0.00015394646,0.000280097,0.00032687883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946654,0.00003166857,0.00012748747,0.00021129173,0.000080552425,0.00008246498],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004474772,0.00014553979,0.00018101076,0.00005017476,0.00079360034,0.0000899786,0.0002798438,0.000048089827,0.0033216914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016461527,0.00012736589,0.00008536104,0.000031161162,0.00016230984,0.00038249715,0.00013351477,0.0004239076,0.00016461663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003964244,0.00016820498,0.0003058466,0.000042488195,0.000044414843,0.000012948321,0.04258351,0.00011260761,0.00006582679,0.9153162,0.03967788,0.0016304003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002688769,0.00053619384,0.00012649293,0.0000019198594,0.00001864058,0.0000072193966,0.0066592023,0.0000574736,0.00010614533,0.0030919795,0.9889249,0.00020090853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025655507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033638455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94924706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004253942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006508431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312125916","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.42","title":"Mental Imagery and the Epistemology of Testimony","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Testimonial; Externalism; Appeal; Epistemology; Internalism and externalism; Mental image; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognition; Law","score_opus":0.04555395362339027,"score_gpt":0.22928907143700436,"score_spread":0.1837351178136141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312125916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53498363,0.019644964,0.00001971629,0.1285153,0.009367076,0.000549389,0.0006795049,0.00001402864,0.30622637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970023,0.000016786547,0.000035598285,0.0016487861,0.0006527054,0.0000028581974,0.0000027997507,0.000010296758,0.0006278517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990962,0.0002301919,0.00032581983,0.000072104456,0.00012516034,0.00015049061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990805,0.00021637657,0.0003070416,0.00011509481,0.00013135692,0.00014963688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070840865,0.000081682774,0.00027059633,0.000156588,0.00054248126,0.000027781112,0.00022417474,0.000020960859,0.00053233735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081231075,0.00005985226,0.00012494042,0.000031927753,0.001873742,0.000079809404,0.00002827734,0.0003812764,0.000002224505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057136614,0.000018109236,0.0006954526,0.000029783652,0.00010427718,0.00009200205,0.024929643,0.000007996391,0.000029488145,0.9668562,0.0066912915,0.0004886564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015673357,0.00044814186,0.00036200904,0.000030189578,0.00011841105,0.00054573576,0.00458932,0.000019036528,0.000032213033,0.75385135,0.23828349,0.00015273318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032078254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046751183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46201867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000456996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038988976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.690388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312131384","doi":"10.14307/jfcs114.4.58","title":"Principle-Based Practice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Position (finance); Movement (music); Power (physics); Engineering; Sociology; Aesthetics; Business; Art; Physics","score_opus":0.13452355507814376,"score_gpt":0.3533295662925538,"score_spread":0.21880601121441004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312131384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7732496,0.009614023,0.0002665327,0.013897298,0.009414268,0.00020348823,0.000032995165,0.000041583695,0.19328019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900538,0.00006685059,0.0014884766,0.0065639876,0.00036554915,0.000004579236,5.4927466e-7,0.0000072320795,0.0014489836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981398,0.00034592726,0.0004080883,0.00013886375,0.0007605282,0.00020681716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997981,0.00077284017,0.0006465801,0.00012287608,0.00040417965,0.00007252934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003169423,0.00009416322,0.0002120141,0.00017905641,0.0011709323,0.00017771134,0.0005215496,0.000018133076,0.0003479949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003434025,0.000072463925,0.00013828748,0.000112348716,0.0012044884,0.0005169514,0.00006984901,0.000476464,0.000015853358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029871584,0.0010942889,0.0057863146,0.00007175953,0.00032630152,0.00033138032,0.046597905,0.0014853802,0.0017677713,0.89631975,0.03385461,0.01206585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032974072,0.0005099425,0.00043401978,0.0000132977575,0.00007257449,0.000060863837,0.016706785,0.00009398073,0.000059185633,0.001979309,0.9796271,0.000113217284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010015021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039661536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94577247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040554693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076003093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90059835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312137337","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12945","title":"Entitlement and misleading evidence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Premise; Entitlement (fair division); Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Empirical evidence; Relation (database); Psychology; Positive economics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.6616221113959211,"score_gpt":0.4232730971534841,"score_spread":0.23834901424243699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312137337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13129655,0.012069381,0.000010000133,0.02326975,0.00036758615,0.0004550269,0.000048688707,0.0000668912,0.8324161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948103,0.00068028114,0.000037456954,0.00052179844,0.0004688153,0.00009287558,0.0000046909063,0.000008033038,0.0033757475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828565,0.00046172037,0.0001578371,0.00033392833,0.00041066983,0.00035018803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988285,0.00079147384,0.00003288118,0.0001560537,0.00008973191,0.00010141018],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018243773,0.00009591695,0.00016338681,0.00011218021,0.0016452684,0.00012129637,0.00019954436,0.000031319392,0.0028677585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018731637,0.00007872826,0.000030585943,0.00006407305,0.0011773187,0.00011066605,0.00057767663,0.00076075236,0.00003609163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004451152,0.00007462813,0.00016674862,0.00005734851,0.000020585454,0.000010532101,0.012538904,8.156242e-7,0.00006555699,0.98428786,0.00050799,0.0022245138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001488001,0.0006446241,0.000048306996,0.000015943255,0.0000070867786,0.0000033909703,0.0043879137,0.000019388146,0.000005014226,0.80366474,0.1909516,0.00010320544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006397547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013821588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86351377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004201824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025124285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313205244","doi":"10.3998/ergo.2236","title":"Assertion, Implicature, and Iterated Knowledge","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Tel Aviv University; University of Toronto; Brown University","keywords":"Implicature; Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Iterated function; Linguistics; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Pragmatics","score_opus":0.20428411076241193,"score_gpt":0.4136098364767337,"score_spread":0.2093257257143218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313205244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7199907,0.0059156716,0.00005362826,0.011449595,0.0045840293,0.0006163385,0.00018579107,0.00005196675,0.25715232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99500525,0.000066707755,0.00006799692,0.001524205,0.0016499012,0.000013613546,0.000024660822,0.000025893527,0.0016217972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986702,0.0003179403,0.00045515737,0.000189222,0.00020444472,0.00016301997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862814,0.000080169935,0.00047996792,0.00021458477,0.00045861493,0.00013853131],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008340916,0.00014609481,0.00033749003,0.00018028206,0.0008568835,0.00120688,0.0015141694,0.0000377273,0.0010831818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033645498,0.00012383737,0.00007580084,0.00009574002,0.00019903005,0.002474332,0.00073990424,0.000648001,0.000006867113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026963768,0.00061197736,0.000701263,0.000056494988,0.00017044692,0.00003850735,0.019492062,0.000016916038,0.00033751695,0.95616436,0.020068796,0.002072046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010085211,0.0008792633,0.0011213465,0.000039444792,0.00008206296,0.00011738106,0.0012099021,0.000023579405,0.00014302015,0.5751884,0.41991475,0.00027234128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060422924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000097796576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39984593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000377658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013919176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318982896","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09603-y","title":"Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Argument (complex analysis); Communication studies; Economic Justice; Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Positive economics; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.16370481807376638,"score_gpt":0.32816689764985746,"score_spread":0.16446207957609107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318982896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97150403,0.00008776487,0.000010978995,0.0013831094,0.00047056045,0.00012433619,0.000023212755,0.000060781196,0.026335223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99188113,0.00010276499,0.00002871219,0.00024206567,0.0002667166,0.000010986775,0.000060128605,0.00000827411,0.007399222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942845,0.000047760892,0.00016415642,0.00011159398,0.00013187069,0.00011617189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966615,0.000086702064,0.0001012068,0.000053171345,0.00007256258,0.000020226142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020744091,0.00007005794,0.00011478721,0.000075587974,0.00026613715,0.000043448348,0.000041181025,0.000029353047,0.00008569491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002281671,0.000066064495,0.000064797794,0.000039770028,0.00025821436,0.00012586928,0.00002368683,0.00005449494,0.000054778808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023331831,0.000068220965,0.0018589582,0.0003820634,0.00015930037,0.0000018906524,0.21359472,0.000010749062,0.0019736118,0.7659927,0.012668725,0.0032657504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036044933,0.00095113955,0.035207488,0.00012742371,0.0017926114,0.000005248053,0.52559805,0.0009606301,0.006708186,0.108050086,0.31601188,0.0009827536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064127475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012505196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6579426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013275376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012116541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2694032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319790968","doi":"10.1177/22925503231153441","title":"Time Does Not Necessarily Make A “Real Expert”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Plastic Surgery","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07635507316081018,"score_gpt":0.26522100416785627,"score_spread":0.18886593100704607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319790968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9395003,0.000092847775,0.000017917055,0.0014035446,0.022057017,0.00009805592,0.00018680975,0.0007932874,0.03585023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678828,0.00017923664,0.000010102711,0.000492874,0.0030470917,0.000043650518,0.00011169373,0.00004958898,0.02818296],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986516,0.000097569355,0.00030953164,0.00027513714,0.00024925455,0.00041688766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854084,0.014096634,0.00009618882,0.00022057646,0.000087429406,0.000090765745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047424744,0.00018317916,0.00037282507,0.00018243016,0.0002846525,0.00011426953,0.00012158932,0.000087262546,0.0013785866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011671102,0.00013528188,0.00018280392,0.00007321473,0.00045900734,0.00011342396,0.000055807275,0.00018052246,0.00283588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000390215,0.0005303571,0.0060134693,0.0006344875,0.0007726545,0.00072784186,0.12449291,0.00006616278,0.0033117433,0.24536708,0.5995838,0.018109264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040735598,0.000063497726,0.0054662246,0.00019227066,0.000104430874,0.000007915995,0.0069953375,0.0015028125,0.0008636853,0.006901447,0.97652197,0.0009730401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003543053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045482515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37693816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017050132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008312314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319871818","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09606-9","title":"Committing Fallacies and the Appearance Condition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.048006236654045804,"score_gpt":0.28564047049037,"score_spread":0.2376342338363242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319871818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95784473,0.0002580233,0.000104248866,0.0066170595,0.00068297604,0.0002425471,0.000010409563,0.0001396864,0.034100335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995261,0.00009231542,0.000012494058,0.0007894097,0.00019477628,0.000023012173,0.000035803623,0.0000050358167,0.0035861342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995994,0.00007707324,0.0000969433,0.0000730223,0.00007450622,0.00007907658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996927,0.00015003233,0.000054917757,0.000059208913,0.00003338594,0.000009782233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035896793,0.000044585788,0.0000655114,0.000024186565,0.00039424017,0.00008559706,0.000035161836,0.000014329519,0.000034715766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002732004,0.000031564894,0.000022211847,0.000024262612,0.000417295,0.0001366055,0.000014108429,0.00006327236,0.00011895014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011635045,0.0000050203357,0.00047412832,0.000031052143,0.000019008821,4.886081e-7,0.075274065,0.0000072919074,0.000109765286,0.9199103,0.0016099294,0.002547286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049148845,0.00011816845,0.023720227,0.00013433298,0.00014914642,0.000004966446,0.17065404,0.003156122,0.0012795118,0.5951406,0.20030715,0.00042086534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011366604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022658943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32476977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000052824635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000040187806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30322164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321487541","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197584132.002.0006","title":"Preface","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Regret; Preference; Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.16350990803099524,"score_gpt":0.267090401908682,"score_spread":0.10358049387768675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321487541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000024681929,0.00018426335,0.0000074464497,0.0005886643,0.0023820503,0.00013349311,0.00007320005,0.00034186326,0.9962866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00013664858,0.00021617196,0.000021601969,0.0007221391,0.0019423042,0.0000054448933,0.0000644644,0.00008167836,0.99680954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992012,0.000008823487,0.00020880852,0.00024927602,0.00016684216,0.0001650745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993164,0.00012236166,0.000098859084,0.00030102488,0.00011516737,0.000046175515],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001375035,0.00021833242,0.00030279675,0.00006967508,0.0001581355,0.00007238792,0.00016102385,0.00022451732,0.008807368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000113246715,0.00018048767,0.00018930843,0.0000023095736,0.000423966,0.000048112975,0.00006508332,0.00044048004,0.00940946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015545143,0.0000034451239,1.6255598e-7,0.000059523696,0.000075790245,0.000007096503,0.0032170694,1.4875928e-7,4.3330715e-7,0.9122816,0.0836461,0.000707126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036102054,0.00002223777,3.68719e-7,0.000036717873,0.000038444166,4.1877715e-7,0.00015029991,7.9491133e-7,0.0000022255417,0.3327867,0.6667707,0.00015497196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009287323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023665864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58312464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014743662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046424237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322101446","doi":"10.1007/s10516-023-09673-3","title":"Can the Epistemic Basing Relation be a Brain Process?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Epistemology; Process (computing); Psychology; Doxastic logic; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.09042735606022542,"score_gpt":0.3005804277281917,"score_spread":0.2101530716679663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322101446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14247048,0.0002632694,0.000014271747,0.32082993,0.0017169463,0.00040771646,0.0002816059,0.00048871763,0.5335271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990259,0.000010145459,0.000008322506,0.006044781,0.0016022346,0.000020768884,0.00007624235,0.000015454061,0.001963037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989023,0.00011890669,0.00022522382,0.00023526186,0.00024793192,0.0002703568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993027,0.00015320272,0.00011481379,0.00025910794,0.00011774005,0.00005246824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040742577,0.00014772521,0.00016236806,0.00003807497,0.000616452,0.0001063109,0.00021871194,0.00007628494,0.0000574349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014363747,0.000109173685,0.00010702508,0.00015668476,0.00047300544,0.0001411589,0.00004442221,0.0002287742,0.00021703386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010325783,0.000016203972,0.00032952757,0.00006614966,0.00003223622,0.0000061748965,0.01215714,0.000027997121,0.000009668935,0.97876924,0.008092111,0.00048323462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017494161,0.000039777726,0.00064825465,0.0000470164,0.000029357972,0.0000047734816,0.0014396025,0.00009585312,0.0000069114253,0.9381283,0.05924254,0.00014266511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023980052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006348449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8477885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057561534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006854222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4741313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323904039","doi":"10.5840/tht20233815","title":"Reconciling the Epistemic and the Zetetic","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Epistemic virtue; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06218353819122607,"score_gpt":0.2499699023227975,"score_spread":0.18778636413157143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323904039","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30282065,0.05670317,0.00013691667,0.3492541,0.010127428,0.00081543595,0.000070419745,0.000058719892,0.28001317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919024,0.00023624544,0.000036893853,0.0028547368,0.002967798,0.000008025419,6.860592e-7,0.000015180818,0.0019780027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984408,0.0006155155,0.0004127641,0.00009058574,0.00029666617,0.00014368421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983939,0.0007845083,0.00045128143,0.00019458789,0.00013705606,0.00003865363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024775274,0.00010881234,0.0002773854,0.000054943055,0.0011146674,0.000081307,0.00038458817,0.000019512368,0.0002437734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009848212,0.00005516051,0.00020090876,0.000043437383,0.0010464175,0.00011053138,0.00011055947,0.00083888636,0.0000061717037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015521291,0.000024482626,0.000017547096,0.00002367925,0.00010011614,0.000013395553,0.037299868,0.000024416391,0.000028925033,0.9600677,0.0011990864,0.0010456102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097582594,0.00016254163,0.000010462131,0.000027465712,0.00013198196,0.00027525466,0.004851145,0.00005203703,0.000017412976,0.76817286,0.22523502,0.00008801257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001647904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014972671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6890818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028406486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065091095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85732335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323912230","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.36","title":"Indifference to Anti-Humean Chances","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Pittsburgh; York University; University of Michigan","keywords":"Deference; Principle of sufficient reason; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08500891616053127,"score_gpt":0.24697262138926027,"score_spread":0.161963705228729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323912230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88491946,0.0015725046,0.000027291944,0.021720046,0.007269083,0.00018708142,0.0002652357,0.000014803233,0.08402449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931659,0.000007202097,0.000039807877,0.0037953067,0.002047722,0.0000039913666,0.0000033638426,0.000014263227,0.00092245004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990854,0.00009077371,0.00026383746,0.000107590786,0.00020200343,0.00025037263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990365,0.00004081165,0.0001854252,0.0001322555,0.00016880773,0.00043619933],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033072534,0.00010382703,0.00023351153,0.00035276177,0.00071484235,0.000076957134,0.00040179375,0.000022327087,0.0015754829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004245613,0.00009871118,0.00011086407,0.000067468594,0.00023284616,0.0001236986,0.000024183664,0.00045209602,0.0000327469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012231761,0.00003191466,0.0013684737,0.00003095232,0.00009697672,0.00023554229,0.11148993,0.000026965106,0.00006605378,0.8753756,0.0097220205,0.0015433162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019848146,0.0004695121,0.0005711003,0.000034486755,0.000034566456,0.000052333908,0.0026291052,0.000002071706,0.00004882718,0.44564587,0.5501235,0.00019011606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022148734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018780213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5404015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008934076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005624359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327911459","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04113-6","title":"Questioning and addressee knowledge","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ask price; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11613279191161362,"score_gpt":0.31169668253871596,"score_spread":0.19556389062710233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327911459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41770673,0.0015478411,0.000020542151,0.001783659,0.0017648829,0.000146355,0.000032704986,0.0005259047,0.5764714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962035,0.00009320358,0.000022675085,0.00008001283,0.00064141804,0.000014309246,0.000006241856,0.0000144617425,0.037092652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995082,0.00006151398,0.00009414979,0.00013049076,0.00005439943,0.00015124286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994454,0.00031372535,0.000027280994,0.00011869314,0.000055093336,0.000039848157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031420702,0.00007189918,0.000110042776,0.00006341436,0.00024237784,0.00006806091,0.00006319136,0.000037895566,0.00021679832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018523868,0.000061927996,0.000031334464,0.000030102374,0.00031400137,0.000088367175,0.000042547552,0.00011411111,0.00069538364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042919505,0.000024182891,0.0003282805,0.000094342184,0.000028021,0.000007667073,0.051111728,0.0000012008568,0.00015443377,0.93051285,0.0077206655,0.010012359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013629129,0.00004117388,0.0012571634,0.00013976287,0.00003359754,0.000003135409,0.009456521,0.0002105127,0.00033256775,0.05262621,0.9355472,0.00021586509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011565135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073190074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9278265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000060424377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018895616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8937982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361011051","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04115-4","title":"Justification and epistemic agency","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Externalism; Philosophy of language; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy of science; Agency (philosophy); Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Epistemic virtue; Virtue","score_opus":0.10720715413733556,"score_gpt":0.2857021834009739,"score_spread":0.17849502926363836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361011051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79509604,0.0005733681,0.000039759634,0.0060178945,0.0016028743,0.00021523172,0.00004643653,0.00040496202,0.19600342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9657751,0.00016115478,0.000018777184,0.0001108861,0.00037609893,0.000017754832,0.000013368297,0.000012365221,0.03351452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994654,0.000052497202,0.00012094671,0.00014809435,0.00007545694,0.00013758216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995141,0.00019287567,0.00004296173,0.00017020488,0.000044554345,0.000035299232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031457542,0.00006969427,0.00010076347,0.000060694874,0.00019449877,0.000047260644,0.00007190714,0.000039291004,0.00021540023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012695233,0.000060219318,0.000033424276,0.0000325991,0.00029056767,0.00008213609,0.00002389196,0.00009139842,0.0007459189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052663263,0.00002130622,0.00021312937,0.00014625854,0.000023864797,0.0000063328775,0.04691787,0.0000013339767,0.0013161221,0.9272608,0.004673214,0.019414457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022134735,0.000065150954,0.0054247044,0.00011208433,0.00009789968,0.000007100096,0.017282786,0.00036509044,0.0010022509,0.25737843,0.71761334,0.00042980048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010342085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016132092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71294016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007350152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000143574025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9587527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362456789","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffad001","title":"Copredication and Meaning Transfer","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Reinterpretation; Sentence; Philosophy; Predicate (mathematical logic); Property (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07281292118925622,"score_gpt":0.2725259959081947,"score_spread":0.19971307471893848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362456789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9624723,0.0004847298,0.002118834,0.007546494,0.0022927618,0.00008545146,0.000008214438,0.00005674498,0.024934432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99712646,0.0006160933,0.00007558402,0.00020512537,0.0007829801,2.6446938e-7,0.0000016767812,0.000008916729,0.0011829217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994502,0.000029700983,0.00023107942,0.000045464236,0.00015273686,0.00009080002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955887,0.00009888404,0.00007847188,0.000052270007,0.00017034102,0.00004118324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046323132,0.00005203277,0.00014139537,0.0000918497,0.00011818745,0.00004882055,0.00006227879,0.000034763703,0.000035891644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045193297,0.00004132705,0.00005103212,0.000029212839,0.00015787002,0.00013577254,0.00000878783,0.00018592153,0.000015352796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019527915,0.000042452506,0.0009344726,0.0001724752,0.00012768741,0.00004441938,0.087015994,0.000027045484,0.0013211144,0.8996028,0.008085478,0.0026065349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020707052,0.0008386695,0.0040922747,0.00057277194,0.00064693176,0.00021526712,0.03377503,0.002020708,0.0021803475,0.28345573,0.669626,0.0005055894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004935566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003758359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6615405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000061899277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026060688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16852683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362552178","doi":"10.32920/22551655.v1","title":"Succeeding Competently: Towards an Anti-Luck Condition for Achievement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Epistemology; Positive economics; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.20916455736964287,"score_gpt":0.3552015285455771,"score_spread":0.14603697117593425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362552178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5774006,0.00041850618,0.013318837,0.020897824,0.054726426,0.006764896,0.005913351,0.0037244055,0.31683517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94323885,0.00015371169,0.0014033465,0.0012951602,0.0054889712,0.00037268607,0.0043923142,0.00012979092,0.043525178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981947,0.00007572438,0.00048272294,0.00059251755,0.00026815737,0.00038618885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987051,0.00012926469,0.0002644082,0.0004071463,0.00039280608,0.00010129426],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007750193,0.00033930416,0.0005715249,0.0001592154,0.00047459576,0.0003962593,0.00036168253,0.0002636094,0.000484205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039754093,0.00030743025,0.0003239237,0.00001677126,0.00035151155,0.00017259376,0.0003097744,0.00055898476,0.00010106647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001418533,0.00015404994,0.00012588357,0.00076322193,0.00024418795,0.0000029175371,0.012759917,0.00007778044,0.00009728627,0.9755851,0.009479903,0.000695553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013421542,0.0006673087,0.0021329785,0.00045969503,0.00059992465,0.0000017870428,0.025898507,0.0028001864,0.0010536624,0.483565,0.47989446,0.0015843292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013311906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026624836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4920201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006845422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012056747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362600893","doi":"10.32920/22551655","title":"Succeeding Competently: Towards an Anti-Luck Condition for Achievement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Epistemology; Positive economics; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.20916455736964287,"score_gpt":0.3552015285455771,"score_spread":0.14603697117593425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362600893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5774006,0.00041850618,0.013318837,0.020897824,0.054726426,0.006764896,0.005913351,0.0037244055,0.31683517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94323885,0.00015371169,0.0014033465,0.0012951602,0.0054889712,0.00037268607,0.0043923142,0.00012979092,0.043525178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981947,0.00007572438,0.00048272294,0.00059251755,0.00026815737,0.00038618885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987051,0.00012926469,0.0002644082,0.0004071463,0.00039280608,0.00010129426],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007750193,0.00033930416,0.0005715249,0.0001592154,0.00047459576,0.0003962593,0.00036168253,0.0002636094,0.000484205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039754093,0.00030743025,0.0003239237,0.00001677126,0.00035151155,0.00017259376,0.0003097744,0.00055898476,0.00010106647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001418533,0.00015404994,0.00012588357,0.00076322193,0.00024418795,0.0000029175371,0.012759917,0.00007778044,0.00009728627,0.9755851,0.009479903,0.000695553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013421542,0.0006673087,0.0021329785,0.00045969503,0.00059992465,0.0000017870428,0.025898507,0.0028001864,0.0010536624,0.483565,0.47989446,0.0015843292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013311906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026624836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4920201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006845422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012056747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362652749","doi":"10.46692/9781847424419.009","title":"Myths and counterarguments: a quick reference summary","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Computer science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.048336255237516404,"score_gpt":0.26825464357810364,"score_spread":0.21991838834058725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362652749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012070368,0.003394821,0.0000086038535,0.00029161805,0.0006161675,0.00015924728,0.0000989426,0.00018166527,0.9952369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00028684447,0.0017642174,0.000114859045,0.0031915826,0.001012307,0.000007706578,0.00009009318,0.0001238802,0.9934085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915856,0.000047226386,0.00017020784,0.0002864708,0.00013751052,0.00020003227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994817,0.000039828978,0.000122879,0.00025546484,0.0000430608,0.00005707787],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010050813,0.00023754268,0.00034017718,0.00009915674,0.00009137829,0.000117311145,0.00013690672,0.00020839077,0.009947189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000077062505,0.000187983,0.00004875594,0.000009247812,0.0003738814,0.00006244098,0.000035524972,0.0002909757,0.00030973103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030996089,0.00002717902,0.000003716843,0.00007887061,0.000046658773,0.000003826732,0.0021177274,2.8437024e-9,6.684747e-7,0.30663624,0.6895879,0.0014940895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016860352,0.00006894713,0.000003879772,0.00018921505,0.000041164778,0.0000015058179,0.0009108498,7.166938e-7,0.0000010654055,0.0051448806,0.99323523,0.00023391681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011041195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007509678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30364734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013435067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003747056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99095786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366398836","doi":"10.3998/phimp.3481","title":"First-Person Propositions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophers Imprint","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Ascription; Property (philosophy); Epistemology; Conjunction (astronomy); Truth value; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.15507037930156745,"score_gpt":0.28659059764503003,"score_spread":0.13152021834346259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366398836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12227927,0.00020485657,0.00013604615,0.07265768,0.004118717,0.00068572117,0.000098417775,0.001687336,0.79813194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98955595,0.000027755628,0.000101886355,0.00082079176,0.0015163063,0.000057098394,0.000025781368,0.000029765442,0.007864655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999139,0.000037586433,0.00015407657,0.00023198088,0.00016004428,0.00027727586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994244,0.000080899365,0.000057647198,0.0002687012,0.00008727905,0.00008105885],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019181073,0.00013668615,0.00016054454,0.000080102975,0.00051977765,0.00008188789,0.0001668327,0.000056943616,0.00064472004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000383311,0.00012310361,0.00013020662,0.00006515167,0.000400098,0.00011993765,0.000046948928,0.00023066801,0.0020762573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068863956,0.000056500467,0.00007400912,0.000072256116,0.0000599146,0.00001299409,0.02888037,0.00004238215,0.0001440215,0.9639087,0.0060372283,0.0007047537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006774788,0.00022199296,0.0008878513,0.00008076521,0.000098162935,0.000007555576,0.010168519,0.00074498286,0.0006111565,0.5934393,0.3924694,0.00059286243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016556459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002589094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86727667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003714057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030456535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366425388","doi":"10.1007/s10677-023-10388-y","title":"Asking before Arguing? Consent in Argumentation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Philosophy of medicine; Worry; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Permission; Law; Political philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.1159527112203184,"score_gpt":0.37185949710131616,"score_spread":0.25590678588099774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366425388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6996406,0.00036981373,0.0003450453,0.07888763,0.0022673851,0.00048626197,0.000022908045,0.00033662136,0.21764375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834489,0.000106257015,0.00012137093,0.010802222,0.00038619316,0.000015033276,0.000017397962,0.000013481168,0.0050891195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998089,0.0011078882,0.0002224447,0.00020803946,0.00016112775,0.00021145528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950881,0.004557839,0.000103411854,0.00011486551,0.0000803668,0.000055430177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045978716,0.000106041494,0.00015846145,0.00007673091,0.0002792489,0.00011312621,0.00006821929,0.00017308712,0.00014435488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033369185,0.0000924709,0.000041411527,0.00006271093,0.000581458,0.00032263505,0.000054080218,0.0011298829,0.00012905203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014391863,0.000036299505,0.00008769706,0.00004880535,0.000022668051,0.000042265907,0.062804125,0.000006561428,0.000038656297,0.93358314,0.000518751,0.0026670964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036205852,0.00010485413,0.00037758437,0.000057004327,0.000043933804,0.0000077618915,0.026764505,0.000061569444,0.000042898682,0.8116682,0.16037917,0.00013045527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013903754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004112274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28380835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016329477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041709583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49088418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366809551","doi":"10.1353/rss.2009.0017","title":"The Ethics of Belief","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genius; Social Darwinism; Atheism; Art history; Philosophy; Alchemy; Environmental ethics; Classics; Sociology; Law; Politics; Religious studies; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.09699486660392616,"score_gpt":0.32588659262568054,"score_spread":0.2288917260217544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366809551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35604987,0.33234566,0.00029320028,0.17642559,0.009286939,0.00085574226,0.000034903278,0.0000756333,0.12463247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92328125,0.06941424,0.000058413912,0.0011466146,0.0011924619,9.540992e-7,4.054942e-7,0.000015386846,0.004890267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768364,0.0005095068,0.0008797397,0.000101711754,0.00051705504,0.00030836393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945515,0.003427516,0.0008048983,0.00029293794,0.00086622796,0.000056951078],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004252749,0.00022277002,0.00058637676,0.00006269113,0.0015123811,0.00006148698,0.000540798,0.00010340649,0.000027371767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003493608,0.000097749034,0.00033833925,0.00007114396,0.0016745193,0.00014455874,0.00003494287,0.0011432759,0.000011128626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055994425,0.0003624358,0.000062121355,0.00019634911,0.0017996347,0.000014509043,0.41188103,0.00009275738,0.001078755,0.5484321,0.0294928,0.0060275486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012397614,0.0015171082,0.00053710764,0.0003636627,0.001115913,0.00007754996,0.06256977,0.0000108962895,0.00424549,0.21203338,0.7159491,0.00034023885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003880692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042101214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6864563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020809328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010032317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376130193","doi":"10.1007/s11098-023-01970-2","title":"Guidance and mainstream epistemology","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Epistemology; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Social epistemology; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.20011805754054685,"score_gpt":0.3432882139970351,"score_spread":0.14317015645648823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376130193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4363036,0.016504552,0.000009655364,0.2848647,0.003823056,0.00046261583,0.000100269186,0.000984429,0.25694713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901825,0.0015035623,0.000038258335,0.0017123651,0.0018454167,0.0000459416,0.000007819855,0.00001903759,0.004645107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998884,0.00009944147,0.0002540352,0.000307439,0.00014168791,0.0003133474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990278,0.0005165849,0.00006709893,0.00018015136,0.00014139593,0.00006699681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037211846,0.00017174531,0.00038380534,0.00006949465,0.0005306968,0.00003356015,0.00011668122,0.000071484574,0.000039895916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033320542,0.00013478758,0.000073922056,0.000062443614,0.0019872605,0.0000752679,0.00018680096,0.00022848375,0.00029515018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010704571,0.000025589621,0.0005593564,0.0001163365,0.00014508456,0.000031842468,0.009359353,7.269683e-7,0.000013973923,0.9847051,0.003956986,0.0010749636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022719796,0.00010717816,0.00088666414,0.000034194974,0.000038161215,0.0000059423655,0.0018581507,0.000014465041,0.000013754868,0.89037967,0.10626344,0.0001712135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029712914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016722368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5538789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001727394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000114852255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73221445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377007133","doi":"10.32920/cd.v1i3.597","title":"Difficult Truths","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Critical Dietetics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.05674368233536783,"score_gpt":0.29409885923520873,"score_spread":0.2373551768998409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377007133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4073269,0.004913234,0.0051775826,0.14739837,0.023280986,0.0005098056,0.00007548645,0.00015680719,0.41116083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99471015,0.000055288114,0.0007631906,0.0011509835,0.0019758516,0.0000016879242,7.7604307e-7,0.00001540194,0.0013266472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881977,0.00008126922,0.0004819274,0.000080050326,0.00028910046,0.00024786495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783725,0.00063551706,0.00011405153,0.00013279673,0.0010994241,0.00018095055],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022656847,0.0001154557,0.00028777227,0.00005558631,0.00014260798,0.00018162253,0.00020159456,0.000075720964,0.0012479908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095487747,0.00008264248,0.00018260111,0.000022814547,0.000917595,0.00026244068,0.000021219477,0.00046010365,0.00020217297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010985604,0.00035501373,0.000047511483,0.0001266969,0.00004989445,0.000028111313,0.008168811,0.0000029005785,0.0007247301,0.944556,0.04414821,0.0017811462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008395959,0.00136765,0.0015720843,0.00017330173,0.00031741871,0.00007984089,0.012431014,0.00021083697,0.00096278876,0.4168167,0.5647645,0.00046428398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010112471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006713867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5873833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016993918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000395231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377031492","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198744221.003.0013","title":"Eliminativism, Dialetheism, and Moore’s Paradox","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; Singapore Management University; Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux","keywords":"Assertion; Irrational number; Absurdity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Absurdism; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11916636921590246,"score_gpt":0.2567617159103714,"score_spread":0.13759534669446893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377031492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000056943212,0.00053007726,0.00001780587,0.0013438239,0.0015424447,0.00021451998,0.00011676406,0.00027462313,0.995903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027689112,0.0012792433,0.000033929537,0.0009202274,0.0017394313,0.000014418979,0.000075295044,0.00011520379,0.9930533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987964,0.000025494644,0.00030982093,0.0004037419,0.0002184842,0.00024606063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988991,0.00040185679,0.00016051637,0.0003199532,0.00013186343,0.000086681845],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027446268,0.0003601245,0.0005220889,0.00013243294,0.00024294031,0.0001272225,0.00015307806,0.00030382987,0.001664471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002742591,0.0002969801,0.00017464045,0.0000048527354,0.0011007178,0.00008366082,0.000109545224,0.00057016994,0.001021553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004586361,0.000007930224,0.0000012134768,0.00011604381,0.0001085504,0.00001906445,0.008504148,6.89116e-8,7.1566916e-7,0.97049975,0.015847754,0.0048901876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000874071,0.000054416538,0.0000048877178,0.00006604211,0.0000793526,0.0000016611014,0.00029736356,0.000003945889,0.0000032509138,0.39583164,0.6033183,0.00025175145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013698536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016591186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58747053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016161408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042710413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377967813","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad053","title":"Degrees of Epistemic Criticizability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Normative; Criticism; Rationality; Context (archaeology); Function (biology); Epistemic virtue; Focus (optics); Philosophy; Sociology; Virtue; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11664729969934759,"score_gpt":0.2987964625216315,"score_spread":0.1821491628222839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377967813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76081836,0.00016666848,0.000040164938,0.18973595,0.0012257795,0.00034460556,0.0001196795,0.00033394786,0.047214832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99758494,0.000007762499,0.000015032792,0.00037987565,0.001106147,0.000021667467,0.000013239572,0.000018736846,0.000852597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985907,0.0002566198,0.0003974135,0.00021901386,0.0002553872,0.00028085426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835026,0.0008061842,0.00009483409,0.0005136159,0.0001714635,0.00006366487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007865292,0.00014717487,0.00030324285,0.000059202564,0.00027881213,0.000038668306,0.00037758035,0.00007953412,0.00023021769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010069688,0.00009685254,0.00019211495,0.00008623575,0.0018052607,0.00009470942,0.000029427818,0.00034275078,0.000450605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020069143,0.000067561814,0.000054984997,0.0000953653,0.00003450734,0.0000035267221,0.025589287,0.0000034843379,0.00020654296,0.97265565,0.00032386289,0.0009451468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016795498,0.0003557737,0.0008487637,0.000028516659,0.00004593619,0.000002559809,0.0027113305,0.00017632266,0.00003372361,0.99336314,0.0021417544,0.00012424501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018810593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021208882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23676656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012141706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030260257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6651558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378651348","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad055","title":"Attribution and Explanation in Relativism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Attribution; Epistemology; Philosophy; Nonsense; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10490703284357576,"score_gpt":0.28338271502863105,"score_spread":0.17847568218505527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378651348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8516546,0.00008520992,0.000065893575,0.13535902,0.0004564344,0.00020496665,0.000021712523,0.00014701439,0.012005126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833083,0.000014988847,0.0000033556119,0.00038531105,0.0006121752,0.000018905996,0.000029624636,0.000008401685,0.0005963792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992604,0.00014324585,0.00017301111,0.00014149577,0.00012388268,0.00015796836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994968,0.00025891187,0.00004410744,0.00013489294,0.00003518498,0.000030058636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005274607,0.00008163406,0.000120770244,0.00007321161,0.00020130734,0.00004695527,0.00008134562,0.000061081155,0.00003551316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024542172,0.000056825436,0.000033120887,0.000067471985,0.000341725,0.00013406594,0.000011472929,0.000282894,0.00020733119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009962354,0.00001711379,0.00009230178,0.0000100528705,0.000007310056,0.0000040161785,0.035902303,0.0000010132262,0.00003358424,0.9618568,0.00013806319,0.0019274994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023048723,0.00015584091,0.00530122,0.000016477741,0.000010259116,0.0000018316084,0.0015825782,0.00032260656,0.0000042120596,0.9868024,0.0054898444,0.00008226868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007669995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003219154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14667624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013781416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000094080315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2664892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378831396","doi":"10.1007/s11098-023-01945-3","title":"Justification and gradability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of language; Adjective; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Metaphysics; Philosophy; Falsity; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of science; Absolute (philosophy); Linguistics; Mathematics; Noun","score_opus":0.37977933893639065,"score_gpt":0.3740336892074225,"score_spread":0.005745649728968127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378831396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67674774,0.004766767,0.00000868168,0.27187973,0.0020759455,0.0003692238,0.000052193187,0.00068693364,0.043412756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965745,0.00073710334,0.000015439362,0.00048423666,0.0010808902,0.00003151809,0.000008715514,0.000008388923,0.0010591983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992725,0.00006075249,0.00016798763,0.00022080897,0.0001233128,0.00015462918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925977,0.00037804694,0.000039850307,0.00014362943,0.0001379105,0.000040807518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036536533,0.00009869477,0.00020154359,0.00003810795,0.00046301683,0.00003120075,0.0000629489,0.000038018818,0.000022549546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036012143,0.00007478001,0.00004566181,0.000047650596,0.0012206906,0.00007251589,0.00008316952,0.00015497171,0.00014171169],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062878394,0.000026002688,0.0003052174,0.000109516084,0.00006284136,0.0000019343197,0.013967846,4.2172636e-7,0.00001926952,0.9822778,0.0016839455,0.0015389335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000937541,0.000039787436,0.002236779,0.000011389976,0.000038313075,5.2924025e-7,0.00256925,0.000020527488,0.000016678445,0.9463528,0.048519146,0.00010103928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023157409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010149457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31982675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012772108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000064899946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44976854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380149559","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2023.2222950","title":"Gerken on epistemic focal bias","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Cognitive bias; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Confirmation bias; Psychology; Philosophy of science; Cognition; Philosophy; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.3852047704680641,"score_gpt":0.34924673792297317,"score_spread":0.035958032545090945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380149559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6777446,0.00017531609,0.000029695579,0.0053135846,0.008868791,0.00020445648,0.000038823222,0.0006694306,0.30695528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9585227,0.0000407081,0.000010001765,0.0016146553,0.0033253103,0.000021312902,0.00003709336,0.000029741948,0.036398526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990005,0.00009663839,0.00020739349,0.00022632517,0.0001851593,0.00028402088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991737,0.0003527497,0.0000646071,0.00028881783,0.00006142823,0.00005871092],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042083673,0.00013056726,0.00019214489,0.00011079587,0.00028982558,0.000069645575,0.00016954032,0.00008737722,0.00037872005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009599449,0.00011126474,0.000116350035,0.00005419965,0.00063516,0.00008747264,0.00004894539,0.0002612136,0.0046451627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020920494,0.00004980749,0.00020282535,0.00006269511,0.000045221703,0.000041772866,0.05576002,0.000012354187,0.000074291864,0.835904,0.10368123,0.0041448628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029945569,0.0001835704,0.0008030384,0.00006733131,0.000023930366,0.0000035309695,0.007336567,0.00006243757,0.00023225036,0.061980635,0.9287495,0.00025777228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009089369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021115276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82506824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023214869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028966837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380204502","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad059","title":"The Essential Berkeley and Neo-Berkeley","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Classics; Environmental ethics; Art history; Library science; History; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.047042627083861366,"score_gpt":0.269722702647228,"score_spread":0.2226800755633666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380204502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51721644,0.0006556863,0.000027937083,0.4192326,0.0028012432,0.00051346375,0.000056809422,0.00046934732,0.059026472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919351,0.00009176544,0.0000039297447,0.0011948439,0.0037754332,0.000036172823,0.0000135883165,0.000028942659,0.0029202646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848676,0.00026051793,0.00029319673,0.00026570112,0.00027920987,0.00041464064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983004,0.00096077396,0.00008739771,0.00046169813,0.00009379998,0.000095973846],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078030775,0.00018422402,0.0002177592,0.00003947211,0.0015686234,0.00032117672,0.0003945186,0.0000901085,0.00007579896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052263655,0.00010355479,0.00013214054,0.000073944204,0.0019104338,0.0001212264,0.00005533383,0.0005334419,0.0005761893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000313023,0.000024622997,0.000010136381,0.000016513988,0.00006416726,0.000007973189,0.021595914,4.7339088e-7,0.000077113815,0.96898156,0.0022670107,0.0069231973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023736939,0.00026790547,0.00032480166,0.0000124889975,0.00005848906,0.0000074136487,0.0023255579,0.0001623969,0.000013127835,0.9235924,0.07283728,0.00016078785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014212534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006113955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47471863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008479715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027917706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380486638","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12934","title":"THE MORALITY OF BELIEF I: HOW BELIEFS WRONG","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit Antwerpen; York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Morality; Surprise; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14627878031106328,"score_gpt":0.2871261165920353,"score_spread":0.140847336280972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380486638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10574338,0.0014856948,0.00006145027,0.23531428,0.006562954,0.00078254676,0.00034313207,0.0007503141,0.64895624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99382263,0.0000993051,0.000015323174,0.00035583758,0.0016423394,0.000022964485,0.000027211032,0.000020719486,0.0039936784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988132,0.00014786376,0.00025794594,0.00020358588,0.00028570503,0.0002916863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986409,0.00046511588,0.00016957601,0.00046586827,0.00020117241,0.000057368732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005579868,0.0001542372,0.0002874736,0.000060201684,0.0006531057,0.00010134781,0.00038496614,0.00005220998,0.000038519687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066563276,0.00010929884,0.00017939358,0.00008672472,0.0010479932,0.00012405343,0.00011290164,0.0002664933,0.00015672274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000099443305,0.00004704548,0.00014623003,0.000073180854,0.00006938457,0.0000025453355,0.0060635842,0.000007654687,0.000048119764,0.98114985,0.011838508,0.0005439222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002588241,0.0000842024,0.0017579977,0.000034225803,0.00003320915,6.7698903e-7,0.0011300744,0.0001308518,0.00022785763,0.61571014,0.38045353,0.00017838573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012712317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026596306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8880792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015404401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031515818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5023227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380486643","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12935","title":"Morality of Belief II: Three Challenges and An Extension","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit Antwerpen; York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Morality; Doxastic logic; Credence; Psychology; Epistemology; Extension (predicate logic); Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.2835522038713345,"score_gpt":0.325109992634859,"score_spread":0.041557788763524506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380486643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83848226,0.0034416514,0.0000067720944,0.027407214,0.0011056527,0.00026987548,0.0000781229,0.000323323,0.12888515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801505,0.0005664584,0.000039586794,0.00020440177,0.0009649287,0.0000085982565,0.000023502713,0.00001690084,0.00016055135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907976,0.000081524064,0.00022294752,0.0002627862,0.00017559867,0.00017739982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922234,0.00010422947,0.00010038416,0.00035099787,0.00015195878,0.00007010053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003671095,0.00013654292,0.00031635017,0.00008455199,0.00028648952,0.000018963425,0.00014221165,0.000058298272,0.000032019412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020869114,0.00011967674,0.00006774904,0.000030023817,0.0005723112,0.00016801617,0.00011909451,0.00016112774,0.000027201082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016250691,0.00012055987,0.00005926939,0.00014738273,0.00003091392,0.0000036338915,0.015268359,0.0000024388944,0.0001240913,0.98057455,0.00030008084,0.003352499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030430956,0.00032646,0.010248552,0.00005393151,0.00003483517,0.0000012630398,0.0009572589,0.00026482492,0.00009903722,0.95886964,0.028655754,0.00018416205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011317626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005767531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15953283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000057311195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012371202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4880276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381249554","doi":"10.3390/philosophies8030051","title":"Armchair Evaluative Knowledge and Sentimental Perceptualism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Epistemology; Empirical research; Social knowledge; Empirical evidence; Social psychology; Descriptive knowledge; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15458938485839427,"score_gpt":0.34242750742135264,"score_spread":0.18783812256295837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381249554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60378164,0.0022160984,0.0000032416588,0.011857616,0.002076417,0.00033391337,0.00011401884,0.00047605895,0.37914103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98345387,0.00024756792,0.000019439693,0.00040771998,0.001891548,0.000029295734,0.00004835862,0.000023777677,0.013878415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912125,0.00011153911,0.00016518135,0.00023832543,0.00014955622,0.00021412809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999455,0.00018093325,0.000050530547,0.00014706017,0.000106944965,0.000059528662],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032207032,0.00015428965,0.00020868373,0.000147508,0.0004314118,0.00006855871,0.0000932684,0.00004972355,0.00041266953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041099564,0.00013486008,0.00007521142,0.000059543192,0.0010393054,0.0001668498,0.00010764861,0.00016675756,0.0010596932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009353911,0.000050337694,0.00007779284,0.00006466371,0.00007400955,0.000005334731,0.20463143,7.316864e-7,0.00022343863,0.78342384,0.01074797,0.0006911182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005964895,0.00015901137,0.0010479377,0.000054587617,0.00009942712,0.00000608604,0.031441543,0.0002143403,0.00027738392,0.7846839,0.18103062,0.00038869787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037316688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001313528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37967226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014793132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020647749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381618496","doi":"10.32388/apuhnb","title":"Review of: \"Either you know or you've gotta believe\"","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.16470823276016863,"score_gpt":0.35863434089671653,"score_spread":0.1939261081365479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381618496","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[2.51451e-7,0.5483066,0.0000047388244,0.044845626,0.0066685774,0.00083371066,0.0010172225,0.00016239187,0.3981609],"genre_scores_gemma":[2.306064e-7,0.44951317,0.00004824872,0.022589076,0.0017617431,0.00007486487,0.0007624783,0.00008445528,0.52516574],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657536,0.00032985554,0.0013332603,0.0006849279,0.00057583424,0.000500758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99625033,0.0004534513,0.0008121693,0.0012354769,0.0011240139,0.00012453191],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018544635,0.00064933277,0.0023169345,0.00013116987,0.000204705,0.000060507416,0.0007956932,0.00038864795,0.031782284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007369805,0.0004261841,0.0008811702,0.00014025312,0.00068653125,0.00010454453,0.00023911739,0.0010448599,0.0031625999],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035975893,0.000057772522,3.8955463e-7,0.1378758,0.00025731366,0.0000084348,0.0009253826,1.5057172e-8,1.4875776e-7,0.04549651,0.8055336,0.009841042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012029747,0.000115465795,5.100706e-7,0.106078826,0.00092347455,0.000004495742,0.00024610735,3.7628564e-7,0.0000018904119,0.0015112938,0.89049566,0.00050159445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010867352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062520076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12700482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044627985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046879004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382562358","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04230-2","title":"Cogito and Moore","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cogito ergo sum; Assertion; Philosophy of language; Irrational number; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Rationality; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09824327239586214,"score_gpt":0.2751527697158968,"score_spread":0.17690949732003466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382562358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6412924,0.000293318,0.000005449767,0.0030283195,0.0010662882,0.00011270476,0.000044726014,0.00030071803,0.35385612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659861,0.000071737326,0.000014787237,0.0002715668,0.0005054963,0.000009978757,0.0000058003566,0.000012420762,0.033122156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995555,0.000033352437,0.00007913686,0.00011792623,0.00007130568,0.0001427511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995797,0.00020143378,0.00002260256,0.00012513204,0.000033513974,0.000037617963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001967065,0.000065601394,0.00010481805,0.000043976215,0.00015774083,0.00005299893,0.000061613435,0.000034352717,0.00035375025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009425768,0.000052927782,0.000032818756,0.000021890251,0.0003396452,0.000066095585,0.000035615212,0.00009116021,0.00056944526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008537151,0.000024545356,0.0005734586,0.000088845074,0.00004310796,0.000021575066,0.043561775,8.882243e-7,0.00022793128,0.9254871,0.01639777,0.013564457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012358626,0.00004186062,0.0011384604,0.00003633803,0.00002546615,0.0000024721433,0.012720463,0.0000808508,0.0002852474,0.06378775,0.92158365,0.0001738195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014588771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003893106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90518594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000036144893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000107138085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73192567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384616469","doi":"10.3998/ergo.3590","title":"Intentional Action, Know-how, and Lucky Success","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Conflation; Epistemology; Judgement; Action (physics); Tacit knowledge; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.26765947042928145,"score_gpt":0.42024480708739326,"score_spread":0.1525853366581118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384616469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8596767,0.0010046379,0.00013925358,0.039623197,0.0074160476,0.0004283716,0.000086362794,0.000096299686,0.09152913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989212,0.000489861,0.000070879876,0.000758146,0.0038266738,0.0000066190614,0.000022977385,0.000029520117,0.0055833254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998676,0.00016631627,0.00042105844,0.00020571369,0.0003244708,0.00020642334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983428,0.00013047301,0.00050210906,0.00018638966,0.00067117746,0.00016705188],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008927122,0.0001666382,0.00036130587,0.00030598242,0.00049874105,0.0021102775,0.0013134215,0.000068551286,0.0006418891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009840124,0.00013631422,0.000109095614,0.0001221329,0.00043115678,0.00538033,0.00045750264,0.00044515496,0.000037251266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021907117,0.00024053591,0.0024978882,0.00014455362,0.00027925815,0.00007581012,0.0061052,0.000017670247,0.00021404773,0.957937,0.026781905,0.005487033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010212951,0.00043112217,0.0057235267,0.00018084941,0.00009714771,0.00006462589,0.0019496835,0.00004357779,0.00018432869,0.801904,0.18809064,0.00030920634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009287222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032617553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16130874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025430225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010964825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385286416","doi":"10.3998/jpe.4624","title":"Participation, Collective Impact, and Your Instrumental Significance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Practical Ethics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conflation; Harm; Core (optical fiber); Epistemology; Outcome (game theory); Positive economics; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Economics; Philosophy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.31148319377137096,"score_gpt":0.45473190702402627,"score_spread":0.1432487132526553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385286416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8960537,0.00022756268,0.0005243274,0.07781761,0.0023314487,0.00023622804,0.000046979952,0.000060967363,0.022701195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99551135,0.00026535822,0.00026877553,0.0011188689,0.00081301184,0.0000034647908,0.0000022883687,0.0000147097535,0.0020021615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984771,0.00037859453,0.00041230142,0.000109806424,0.00040828233,0.000213888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960865,0.0026068925,0.00040214864,0.00008604824,0.0006646135,0.0001538102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022069148,0.00010948849,0.00025358153,0.0001075364,0.00037003867,0.00015351071,0.00007491766,0.00014711305,0.00017235297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042577614,0.00008327844,0.00010722259,0.00009736654,0.0006926182,0.00053857756,0.000037038822,0.0016661943,0.000040933905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005226047,0.00045217367,0.0027244773,0.00016095514,0.00059457286,0.0002213247,0.25798422,0.00006032749,0.0007942633,0.7044946,0.029650277,0.0023402215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030351821,0.0038403426,0.02528665,0.00026234932,0.00073900126,0.00034670072,0.07371049,0.0009866904,0.0013217172,0.48966393,0.40001076,0.0007961639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040567684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014067734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3703605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079592304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008115861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72388774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385325100","doi":"10.1017/9781009329934.003","title":"Virtue, Knowledge, and the Good","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05296711819118081,"score_gpt":0.21845531855631753,"score_spread":0.16548820036513673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385325100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000026690544,0.0006325961,0.000012215092,0.000118935226,0.0011032165,0.00036275422,0.0002933106,0.00018131988,0.997269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00093621237,0.0004087381,0.00000350117,0.00016498203,0.0007477671,0.0000013397106,0.00003357754,0.000057822774,0.99764603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989843,0.00009451356,0.00017319381,0.00037910521,0.00015288482,0.00021601022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986439,0.00043436445,0.00018261664,0.00044468543,0.00020315203,0.00009131183],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002775894,0.00031900458,0.0004723015,0.00010973774,0.00065181917,0.000102420636,0.0003931806,0.0002631833,0.000009616723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015190562,0.0002657111,0.00024956476,0.0000028414279,0.002784352,0.00006498299,0.00040553516,0.00071706256,0.00009463543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060058213,0.0000055720016,2.0680635e-7,0.00011462369,0.00023377637,0.00004181878,0.0026307586,9.116189e-8,5.536179e-7,0.94651157,0.04989529,0.00050565484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008706784,0.00003255964,0.0000023373254,0.0001133615,0.0004090339,0.000003789611,0.00050463254,0.000012932877,0.0000056076615,0.0016223375,0.99611664,0.0003060924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028081762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017472846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94622135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004008132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007850535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385805837","doi":"10.31124/advance.23929176.v1","title":"The Demands of Expertise","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Focus (optics); Face (sociological concept); Pandemic; Epistemology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Philosophy; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.21151157454587863,"score_gpt":0.3197156595812854,"score_spread":0.10820408503540677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385805837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02929155,0.0036372608,0.0004342741,0.008919037,0.015326805,0.0005814843,0.00010911968,0.00044293722,0.94125754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61339587,0.0011654643,0.000065590946,0.00035299538,0.0016040872,0.0000799599,0.000031000804,0.000042710584,0.3832623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991219,0.000069859816,0.00030994992,0.00018527404,0.00015406145,0.00015892647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884605,0.0003279358,0.00016104046,0.00047478787,0.00016322224,0.000026953669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042033847,0.00013485235,0.00025490948,0.00003493942,0.0002510447,0.000089947614,0.00033277972,0.00013053222,0.00022184468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073929936,0.00007913935,0.00020176104,0.000008841385,0.0006983829,0.000021917795,0.00034320104,0.0003903795,0.00010329651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006110622,0.000020116782,0.00003411433,0.00014297583,0.0001151091,0.0000015297448,0.03398537,0.000008321433,0.000007442753,0.933972,0.030190337,0.0015165961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013977884,0.000047866528,0.00014233928,0.0001292896,0.000082711,4.0108702e-7,0.011860882,0.00017123047,0.0003861213,0.41415766,0.5726098,0.00027191697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010632398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056109754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58410436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011335985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007550158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3227209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385839372","doi":"10.31124/advance.23929275.v1","title":"Inductive Risk and Epistemically Detrimental Dissent in Policy-Relevant Science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Faith; Harm; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08713129383442356,"score_gpt":0.32731960503647467,"score_spread":0.2401883112020511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385839372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94330186,0.00031325605,0.00007983794,0.0026195522,0.0024156491,0.0006461637,0.0002024842,0.00016800608,0.05025318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98950505,0.0004715788,0.00028857213,0.00019413095,0.0007961488,0.0000453025,0.0000198613,0.000032357253,0.008646992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978656,0.00013472856,0.00044971242,0.00075703143,0.0003581609,0.000434724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876666,0.00030099505,0.0002327559,0.00039906238,0.00016479434,0.00013572487],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011019883,0.0002867814,0.00044556533,0.0005642448,0.00035053917,0.00027707743,0.00040303136,0.00018943781,0.000046877823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041204153,0.00023761347,0.00010204883,0.000120949444,0.003606166,0.00014360827,0.0011436767,0.0012128408,0.00006468009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024062032,0.00016227074,0.0048288302,0.00021034386,0.00007277958,0.000019301668,0.071212724,0.000018524737,0.0005085402,0.92045057,0.0002723339,0.0022197294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000991728,0.00025615268,0.02716685,0.0007237571,0.0001539774,0.000009564811,0.04360681,0.0004964579,0.0020109045,0.9118199,0.011263825,0.0015001127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024493307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012947364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046203185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024499168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004892668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386297582","doi":"10.5840/eps202360346","title":"Social Scientific Knowledge about Knowledge and Information","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Epistemology & Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Epistemology; Computer science; Relation (database); Phrase; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Knowledge management; Procedural knowledge; Object (grammar); Commonsense knowledge; Body of knowledge; Set (abstract data type); Phenomenon; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07669607980000458,"score_gpt":0.3146905150535573,"score_spread":0.23799443525355268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386297582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55040675,0.00071501406,0.000014597306,0.0039620465,0.0046780747,0.0002840695,0.000048009468,0.00019380252,0.43969762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954859,0.000023860777,0.000038627808,0.00014523018,0.00058518356,0.000015913094,0.00001917066,0.000008836199,0.0036772718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831206,0.00010946271,0.00046350976,0.00037752072,0.00028868465,0.00044873857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984613,0.00020717781,0.00025132156,0.0002717201,0.0007042932,0.000104169376],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022439458,0.00017332369,0.00033591868,0.0007451292,0.0021862674,0.00017907051,0.00053442566,0.00010607426,0.000044155197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019215971,0.00016058875,0.00009240325,0.00064004154,0.023273,0.0014721649,0.0002671849,0.00023612365,0.00059147214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076232686,0.000045465466,0.00015086004,0.00019337352,0.000010684993,0.0000012552189,0.07173692,5.6036777e-7,0.00047849186,0.92267936,0.00234405,0.0023513283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008524356,0.00031110566,0.01233065,0.00013697192,0.000062967025,0.000023344759,0.0042826002,0.00042293238,0.0011124706,0.54583883,0.4340448,0.00058087055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025030577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059626185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44507915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039969127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033490593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386636150","doi":"10.1093/analys/anad007","title":"Perceptual noise and the bell curve objection","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada First Research Excellence Fund","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Doxastic logic; Perception; Appeal; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Cognitive psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04486903487056938,"score_gpt":0.2656883515451143,"score_spread":0.2208193166745449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386636150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.916512,0.0003639465,0.00010642487,0.003447935,0.00043005767,0.00011132712,0.00002408694,0.00014099306,0.07886322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679035,0.00024494508,0.0000048106444,0.00040753328,0.0003738301,0.0000089167115,0.000034639033,0.0000061740416,0.031015668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993781,0.00012881854,0.00012485677,0.00014258579,0.00010668977,0.00011896091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946237,0.00022585662,0.000048152033,0.00016934221,0.00007030259,0.000023965025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005020329,0.000070862814,0.00019481701,0.00010682334,0.00042937827,0.00008258616,0.00006814381,0.000033012802,0.00044020044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045206,0.000044820234,0.00020039963,0.00020730268,0.00058289646,0.00007152628,0.000032526408,0.00011904528,0.00020228015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004698512,0.00004490141,0.008281082,0.000033313092,0.00296679,0.0000057210445,0.30844077,0.00017193513,0.00004528416,0.66507065,0.011474575,0.0034179725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026955048,0.00018100956,0.06726958,0.00002145876,0.015723819,0.0000038032026,0.2161519,0.02252781,0.000092810355,0.10383589,0.5705351,0.0009612937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001927089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008588607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5612348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006023962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000082320375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4819886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386828047","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190068226.013.22","title":"Prospects for a Quietist Moral Realism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Moral realism; Epistemology; Realism; Pragmatism; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Ontology; Order (exchange); Moral psychology; Philosophy; Moral philosophy; Philosophical realism; Moral reasoning; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.11968186010121629,"score_gpt":0.24003579283514906,"score_spread":0.12035393273393277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386828047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014281176,0.000042706033,0.000046974714,0.00009729928,0.0012179409,0.00075705646,0.0012964852,0.00031317226,0.9962141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00021461732,0.00013548543,0.00009743517,0.0001179808,0.0009927832,0.0000053996096,0.00022524217,0.00009505014,0.998116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987731,0.000022867502,0.00019680936,0.00046396122,0.0002088894,0.00033435537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880844,0.0001387536,0.0002564764,0.00042279455,0.00026809858,0.00010543466],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014409231,0.000349711,0.0004904402,0.00013469107,0.0005546058,0.000100961566,0.00040432595,0.00036538145,0.000052756837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010708843,0.00038664544,0.0003744051,0.0000024594526,0.00080129335,0.00008448198,0.000196002,0.00047193124,0.000007547062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008460243,0.000009081458,4.029943e-7,0.0002795834,0.00019668964,0.000062601815,0.00500985,6.051814e-7,0.0000012445256,0.9684357,0.025215229,0.00070442085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004663581,0.0001068295,8.068725e-7,0.00013019687,0.00027553536,0.0000015799435,0.0003488135,0.00000960802,0.000009590175,0.09016329,0.90809864,0.00038877327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031666385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017515621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88288337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008477971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010180988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387120749","doi":"10.1017/s001221732300029x","title":"Can a Thought's Whole Subject-Matter Be Itself? The Case of Pain","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Infallibility; Cogito ergo sum; Subject (documents); Subject matter; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.062483248677963614,"score_gpt":0.26858207164493647,"score_spread":0.20609882296697285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387120749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86289155,0.00029024642,0.000030180952,0.042119093,0.0025230965,0.00052417023,0.0011364996,0.00023707731,0.09024808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806379,0.000014374469,0.000007568798,0.0039294474,0.0008109549,0.000033613844,0.00012249177,0.000022677672,0.014420946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894273,0.0003519387,0.00020819646,0.00016060748,0.00009268793,0.00024383947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987594,0.000703039,0.000086682165,0.00031931067,0.00009310653,0.000038493265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010952149,0.00011793331,0.00020425548,0.000060881805,0.00031273716,0.000053559346,0.000163869,0.00006330947,0.00022961079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012641653,0.00007953201,0.0001211872,0.00007484767,0.00051926635,0.000055787645,0.00005156514,0.00020664088,0.00024458498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013484484,0.000083009894,0.00078535243,0.00018027429,0.00012586416,0.0004432681,0.21267371,0.000011343307,0.00024241327,0.5052825,0.27811018,0.0020485937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038932727,0.00012550157,0.00061828434,0.000040136965,0.0000979264,0.000043331678,0.032576326,0.000107159,0.00053001835,0.044287346,0.9208646,0.0003200608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040687583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043714147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64275444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009480956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042484095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9737356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387264426","doi":"10.1017/epi.2023.46","title":"Partisan Epistemology and Misplaced Trust","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Irrationality; Misinformation; Epistemology; Virtue; Rationality; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07855720426159295,"score_gpt":0.28336191399822913,"score_spread":0.20480470973663617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387264426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6711658,0.0008244163,0.000029832387,0.01217546,0.00372452,0.00043136213,0.000090874084,0.0007458867,0.31081182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8662941,0.000088174645,0.00004368655,0.0008509537,0.00092129316,0.00004465834,0.000055052013,0.000038097154,0.13166398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984876,0.00019068028,0.0003508348,0.00036445857,0.00015814549,0.00044831348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990261,0.0003213383,0.00011657103,0.00032855244,0.00008129198,0.00012610063],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063049805,0.00020103922,0.00036562892,0.00012144943,0.00044383333,0.00010145294,0.00016604156,0.00011920305,0.00059105636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011082078,0.0001827268,0.000099045574,0.00007538658,0.0009972946,0.00013262947,0.00008502362,0.00024364413,0.0011528858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000267437,0.000038861886,0.0024391226,0.00023167067,0.00008043377,0.0000690588,0.019698923,0.000002336617,0.00024871467,0.93371767,0.041676745,0.0017697001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062091585,0.00015266062,0.003225128,0.00004047368,0.000052004943,0.000024099492,0.003610378,0.00019278757,0.0001424651,0.036956295,0.9546335,0.00034933034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020688915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082939246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9129567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002047944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003594626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387324408","doi":"10.3765/sp.16.4","title":"Probabilities and logic in implicature computation: Two puzzles with embedded disjunction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semantics and Pragmatics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation; European Commission","keywords":"Implicature; Probabilistic logic; Utterance; Computer science; Ignorance; Sentence; Inference; Deviance (statistics); Context (archaeology); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Pragmatics; Machine learning; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04579230929807469,"score_gpt":0.2880126100749286,"score_spread":0.24222030077685391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387324408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812538,0.00045361166,0.00073092134,0.006247325,0.00037406018,0.00052651775,0.000033653054,0.0001572587,0.010222874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969778,0.00019960142,0.0010083433,0.00022966076,0.00017718502,0.000018368162,0.00005001308,0.000016927363,0.0013220705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999262,0.00006208347,0.00020465018,0.00017920378,0.00011441961,0.00017768887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994296,0.00024370155,0.000085420004,0.00011356472,0.00008860559,0.000039136336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030807167,0.00013316915,0.00021661908,0.00008453672,0.00020509677,0.0001563212,0.00004342019,0.000056866837,0.000008560383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035970545,0.000098176926,0.000019624718,0.00007537304,0.00043749547,0.0001170093,0.00003995494,0.0001889387,0.000006395792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001658448,0.000043306612,0.0020201309,0.0006635588,0.00003430612,0.000007809857,0.052052155,0.00010567209,0.000015579257,0.9430309,0.00062968483,0.0013803131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001326954,0.00035721448,0.004326683,0.00027586697,0.00012229322,0.000032647975,0.05931697,0.018750226,0.000029342045,0.901814,0.013129446,0.0005183505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003666295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017898451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04121689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000072951743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022511325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40035388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387334457","doi":"10.3765/sp.16.3","title":"Context Dynamics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semantics and Pragmatics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Computer science; Generalization; Conversation; Natural (archaeology); Context (archaeology); Simple (philosophy); Sentence; Natural language; Artificial intelligence; Dynamics (music); Natural language processing; Linguistics; Epistemology; Psychology; Programming language","score_opus":0.050413288795176224,"score_gpt":0.26466510428716916,"score_spread":0.21425181549199293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387334457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6916865,0.0010777909,0.0017581977,0.020944579,0.005943434,0.00074501627,0.0003403138,0.00089440943,0.27660972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97742087,0.0005184888,0.0002120121,0.0008171953,0.0004323919,0.000006626208,0.00007925236,0.00003112035,0.020482041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991773,0.00004763649,0.00023906163,0.00014803014,0.00014610366,0.00024188281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924946,0.00028047146,0.00009166826,0.00020435307,0.00010903267,0.00006502124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039846764,0.00013361922,0.00022444614,0.00007977818,0.00032610254,0.00015750516,0.00010414705,0.00007278537,0.00007823019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008905152,0.00011673993,0.00005580231,0.000054936037,0.0003902518,0.00008896194,0.000068768,0.00019475867,0.00022778776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023008906,0.00001970643,0.00023576948,0.00018391144,0.000039997187,0.00000841559,0.020043079,0.0000034465884,0.0000052103273,0.9692066,0.0057530156,0.004498586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004933457,0.00013747296,0.0003453192,0.000109357425,0.00013293435,0.000009937929,0.033601977,0.040402018,0.000036748625,0.30274984,0.62150973,0.00047133517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060637387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015312398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6664567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009916586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024943009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47605163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387429766","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12952","title":"Norms of Inquiry","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Normative; Epistemology; Norm (philosophy); Relation (database); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.2256646157597476,"score_gpt":0.3166112092298294,"score_spread":0.09094659347008177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387429766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2704057,0.00022249618,0.00004914422,0.009992318,0.005155031,0.0002484078,0.00009214842,0.00046677855,0.713368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99573094,0.000025210651,0.0000220289,0.0004263179,0.0021450373,0.000011267425,0.00003353482,0.000017889211,0.0015877542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991819,0.000047214915,0.00024374269,0.0001575585,0.00017975317,0.0001898296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993145,0.00014345456,0.00010359876,0.00026520618,0.00012642996,0.000046839352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002159513,0.00011237049,0.00026076086,0.00011985392,0.00014667927,0.000023435385,0.00020512073,0.00004373364,0.00017380308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024893694,0.000096213604,0.00012456477,0.00007577822,0.00061460485,0.00010486782,0.000065409426,0.00016543407,0.00062146503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009542053,0.000053870117,0.00016726743,0.000111793655,0.00004540047,0.0000044339426,0.022766976,0.000009364225,0.000086064996,0.9665207,0.009887898,0.00033666764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033372123,0.00010360239,0.0009337201,0.000045382356,0.000030810188,9.56132e-7,0.0016777075,0.00010143031,0.0003711276,0.7883544,0.20784438,0.00020273495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006340172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005175621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7253252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008808489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021525699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7987883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387709035","doi":"10.1093/monist/onad025","title":"Disingenuous Infallibilism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Monist","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Assertion; Skepticism; Epistemology; Proposition; Relevance (law); Action (physics); Norm (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Premise; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10851475183553676,"score_gpt":0.2802762184136467,"score_spread":0.17176146657810992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387709035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63579386,0.00036248585,0.000009603594,0.013040319,0.0023711328,0.00018600211,0.000035887442,0.00046881355,0.3477319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91598547,0.000046174184,0.0000068504232,0.00080434297,0.0008983067,0.000011812285,0.000014620344,0.000017071625,0.082215354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942803,0.00005477279,0.00011116546,0.00011196403,0.0001101764,0.00018389484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994737,0.00013634899,0.000038897255,0.00028853895,0.000036464015,0.000026031501],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031774412,0.00007802758,0.0001017177,0.00002382359,0.0006635852,0.00013742012,0.00019499639,0.00002834713,0.00012869171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032805205,0.000049387865,0.00006759244,0.000038314833,0.00063750235,0.000049191323,0.00005702852,0.00016132032,0.0012443373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065855265,0.000022983968,0.00009822427,0.000022828159,0.000035424797,0.000009873172,0.07006396,0.000010288937,0.000080586724,0.8963789,0.02971342,0.0035569214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008637597,0.000026156937,0.00059028435,0.0000080857235,0.000023026048,0.0000012107365,0.0037867904,0.00006265127,0.00009479145,0.09548164,0.8997393,0.00009965749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034569102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009999204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87002593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008621877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017145352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387867109","doi":"10.1111/phpe.12187","title":"Knowing what it's like","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Perspectives","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Epistemology; Character (mathematics); Appeal; Inference; Cognitive science; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13008296737289965,"score_gpt":0.32053458954666325,"score_spread":0.1904516221737636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387867109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07034215,0.004691442,0.00002510575,0.35729414,0.0051826127,0.00042614952,0.00003301912,0.0012918143,0.5607136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833409,0.00091369,0.00003026337,0.002142902,0.004807514,0.00002803768,0.000014786104,0.00004028444,0.008681611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985981,0.000106103755,0.0002182911,0.00043134866,0.00027201313,0.00037416967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990301,0.00030758092,0.000057467903,0.00029412765,0.00019602285,0.00011467986],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034333387,0.00020091762,0.00028515165,0.00015531253,0.0005181173,0.00031888997,0.00023067721,0.00010398903,0.0006927221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016421799,0.00017702993,0.00021572805,0.00011654456,0.0009846566,0.0007167846,0.00010206622,0.00048688354,0.001550516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014636901,0.00008286006,0.00000985392,0.000026590145,0.000066300694,0.000021071433,0.11768947,0.0000038332855,0.00006646401,0.8781637,0.0030176155,0.0008375856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023208864,0.00009095088,0.00010682266,0.00006088226,0.000033902314,0.0000026236146,0.10190757,0.000072280716,0.000022548753,0.6994397,0.19776666,0.0002639406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003861426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000077827324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91299874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048434027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003723441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387894874","doi":"10.1111/phpe.12178","title":"A planning theory of belief","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Perspectives","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15891932487628246,"score_gpt":0.3266843273695514,"score_spread":0.16776500249326892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387894874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31798682,0.0022487268,0.00008007289,0.024220593,0.00085937843,0.00024987885,0.000077987876,0.0005245804,0.65375197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99637455,0.000043191292,0.000031315376,0.0002123021,0.0015080352,0.0000115642515,0.000007180269,0.000020748012,0.0017911249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990415,0.00011779408,0.0001958149,0.00024181293,0.0001903799,0.00021272678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907583,0.00043574837,0.0000777871,0.00020001529,0.00015505777,0.000055558634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043738843,0.00012592874,0.000254173,0.00013673994,0.00021423587,0.00002467384,0.00016577107,0.00006840967,0.0003488805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002697881,0.00010611686,0.00014552423,0.00008287967,0.0011922373,0.00010482201,0.00006269273,0.00030055802,0.00015592127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003547831,0.0000769787,0.000058605543,0.000033218585,0.000067062356,0.000008352452,0.13294259,0.000008088768,0.00014597776,0.86616147,0.00030036253,0.00016184336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018395476,0.00011292656,0.00071428553,0.000035197627,0.000027358818,0.0000011784514,0.03721868,0.000022537952,0.00007675196,0.95582145,0.0056573516,0.0001283421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016606858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000059451013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6783877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017062397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027301021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43928477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387934042","doi":"10.32920/24435328.v1","title":"Lacking, needing, and wanting","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Epistemology; Psychology; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.2498286428352913,"score_gpt":0.31878755060483716,"score_spread":0.06895890776954586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387934042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090358615,0.0011831977,0.0002146676,0.003031353,0.012552903,0.0003609812,0.000072020746,0.0009376373,0.89128864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62331825,0.00077372184,0.0003425435,0.00083347125,0.005597844,0.000035592562,0.0000842706,0.000100790516,0.36891353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898803,0.00003878648,0.00024660188,0.00035001745,0.00013709965,0.00023945537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928623,0.00016001795,0.00014339612,0.00023323575,0.00012624254,0.000050864426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045477957,0.00020216433,0.00031730972,0.000101979895,0.000270828,0.00047581803,0.0001603884,0.000193945,0.0002502531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080124264,0.00017496748,0.000093683106,0.000010684773,0.00040119397,0.000062160245,0.000576196,0.0007457519,0.0001297119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014206297,0.000010876952,0.00050900655,0.00033368717,0.00007873197,0.0000062254917,0.027918518,0.000013464304,0.000004630619,0.9506602,0.019838883,0.0006243056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017995565,0.00003509934,0.00034564413,0.00029097943,0.00013021736,0.0000022580382,0.017244112,0.00085195893,0.000027640468,0.18213251,0.7981727,0.0005869379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023039756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013325117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7783338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010338071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041695643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7134967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387958773","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04331-y","title":"On the zetetic significance of peer disagreement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; State (computer science); Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.11093289523001966,"score_gpt":0.2861970942935,"score_spread":0.17526419906348034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387958773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63642967,0.0000830609,0.000019305711,0.021907961,0.0014779671,0.00039492224,0.000107309745,0.00012151799,0.33945832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95662135,0.000012677313,0.0000038483395,0.00031192988,0.00020024752,0.00002886502,0.00000346969,0.000010356617,0.04280728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992671,0.000091073045,0.0001345904,0.0001143588,0.00024625583,0.00014660998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856704,0.000994471,0.000059745867,0.00027208764,0.00008607607,0.00002056812],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005757559,0.000075646756,0.0001189558,0.000032738833,0.00013553003,0.000023228344,0.00016686018,0.000023141947,0.0009485385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034692866,0.00004486659,0.0000753379,0.00003529092,0.00046005403,0.000026424876,0.000027679174,0.00011554974,0.0006167031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008564748,0.000040881754,0.000031199794,0.000037617254,0.000031730284,0.0000020653092,0.021721939,0.000010405763,0.0003282202,0.9585842,0.01820909,0.000994124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001852264,0.00023000143,0.0007512786,0.00015924203,0.00006759587,4.0429836e-7,0.03263603,0.00016632944,0.0063504125,0.2587519,0.70041203,0.00028951114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000120721765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001997416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69983226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008294201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017485503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388267503","doi":"10.32920/24435331","title":"The metaphysics of responsible believing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Mental state; Epistemology; Philosophy; Inference; State (computer science); Reflection (computer programming); Psychology; Cognitive science; Computer science","score_opus":0.21207122091008862,"score_gpt":0.3231747090998357,"score_spread":0.11110348818974708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388267503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033452775,0.0036046663,0.00047688096,0.013456503,0.01867537,0.0011752024,0.0003444099,0.0008062078,0.92800796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37052467,0.002413895,0.0009040863,0.0006512537,0.0036039478,0.00013941187,0.000104520186,0.00017197905,0.62148625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837625,0.00023665254,0.00049749995,0.0003131887,0.000302863,0.0002735539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969321,0.0014342604,0.00035641468,0.0008536634,0.00038493722,0.000038646478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013997284,0.00023067577,0.00046803465,0.000084253326,0.0004900012,0.00018230456,0.000575817,0.0001630688,0.00011533402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024284153,0.00014891503,0.0003956574,0.000038740443,0.0009506786,0.000056012683,0.00068633875,0.0008150818,0.00014969167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013887181,0.000023860382,0.00001885091,0.00020804105,0.0002639354,0.0000014361265,0.015558785,0.000037494454,0.00003642449,0.97188663,0.011092491,0.0008581383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007765922,0.000036306028,0.00007593121,0.00012530117,0.00015971564,2.2110706e-7,0.0065140566,0.00008325166,0.0006588161,0.70651627,0.2855195,0.00023297837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009303842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004826862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3370719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018696324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027786984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6072579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388267728","doi":"10.32920/24435331.v1","title":"The metaphysics of responsible believing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Mental state; Epistemology; Philosophy; Inference; State (computer science); Reflection (computer programming); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.21207122091008862,"score_gpt":0.3231747090998357,"score_spread":0.11110348818974708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388267728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033452775,0.0036046663,0.00047688096,0.013456503,0.01867537,0.0011752024,0.0003444099,0.0008062078,0.92800796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37052467,0.002413895,0.0009040863,0.0006512537,0.0036039478,0.00013941187,0.000104520186,0.00017197905,0.62148625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837625,0.00023665254,0.00049749995,0.0003131887,0.000302863,0.0002735539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969321,0.0014342604,0.00035641468,0.0008536634,0.00038493722,0.000038646478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013997284,0.00023067577,0.00046803465,0.000084253326,0.0004900012,0.00018230456,0.000575817,0.0001630688,0.00011533402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024284153,0.00014891503,0.0003956574,0.000038740443,0.0009506786,0.000056012683,0.00068633875,0.0008150818,0.00014969167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013887181,0.000023860382,0.00001885091,0.00020804105,0.0002639354,0.0000014361265,0.015558785,0.000037494454,0.00003642449,0.97188663,0.011092491,0.0008581383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007765922,0.000036306028,0.00007593121,0.00012530117,0.00015971564,2.2110706e-7,0.0065140566,0.00008325166,0.0006588161,0.70651627,0.2855195,0.00023297837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009303842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004826862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3370719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018696324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027786984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6072579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388270033","doi":"10.32920/24435328","title":"Lacking, needing, and wanting","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Epistemology; Psychology; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.2498286428352913,"score_gpt":0.31878755060483716,"score_spread":0.06895890776954586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388270033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090358615,0.0011831977,0.0002146676,0.003031353,0.012552903,0.0003609812,0.000072020746,0.0009376373,0.89128864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62331825,0.00077372184,0.0003425435,0.00083347125,0.005597844,0.000035592562,0.0000842706,0.000100790516,0.36891353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898803,0.00003878648,0.00024660188,0.00035001745,0.00013709965,0.00023945537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928623,0.00016001795,0.00014339612,0.00023323575,0.00012624254,0.000050864426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045477957,0.00020216433,0.00031730972,0.000101979895,0.000270828,0.00047581803,0.0001603884,0.000193945,0.0002502531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080124264,0.00017496748,0.000093683106,0.000010684773,0.00040119397,0.000062160245,0.000576196,0.0007457519,0.0001297119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014206297,0.000010876952,0.00050900655,0.00033368717,0.00007873197,0.0000062254917,0.027918518,0.000013464304,0.000004630619,0.9506602,0.019838883,0.0006243056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017995565,0.00003509934,0.00034564413,0.00029097943,0.00013021736,0.0000022580382,0.017244112,0.00085195893,0.000027640468,0.18213251,0.7981727,0.0005869379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023039756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013325117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7783338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010338071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041695643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7134967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388387924","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195140774.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Epistemology; Counterexample; Demise; Philosophy; Defeasible reasoning; Focus (optics); Class (philosophy); Quarter (Canadian coin); Mathematics; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.06976207689463149,"score_gpt":0.24222754908409277,"score_spread":0.1724654721894613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388387924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000025155823,0.00031565886,0.00003334701,0.0031174847,0.0035594169,0.00009427434,0.000013984584,0.00012335452,0.99274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011164974,0.000334398,0.000028033823,0.0007269612,0.022538122,0.0000026297555,0.00008519962,0.000039702452,0.9761333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927974,0.000008818853,0.00020116131,0.00025143544,0.00012874976,0.00013007487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993985,0.000030705956,0.00010721926,0.00027811257,0.00015023863,0.00003517319],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011644398,0.00019247844,0.00025582503,0.000073812254,0.00015465969,0.000061888335,0.000093353636,0.00019310963,0.05111483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000819675,0.00016312436,0.00014512199,0.0000020532266,0.00041275175,0.00007220143,0.000024006787,0.0004105563,0.0029222711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024626786,0.0000054593156,1.1437676e-7,0.000019399162,0.000042356925,0.0000028622965,0.0011132804,1.2507088e-7,6.622318e-7,0.77149016,0.22495021,0.0023729429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038789243,0.00002920663,1.3695724e-7,0.000010114942,0.00004561159,0.0000035530686,0.00011052419,4.4083825e-7,0.0000028751053,0.25924942,0.7403608,0.00014850972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000070088245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010052203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5154106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002499215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026837868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99785405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388634726","doi":"10.1080/02580136.2023.2273119","title":"Knowledge and society: A comprehensive approach to social epistemology","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Social epistemology; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Epistemology; Sociology; Dimension (graph theory); Evolutionary epistemology; Meta-epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1223028523450762,"score_gpt":0.2941428951324007,"score_spread":0.1718400427873245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388634726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45531976,0.0021307785,0.0006001056,0.01933367,0.004239986,0.00070333807,0.00035849996,0.00023322046,0.5170806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934735,0.000015511463,0.00037267676,0.0008472887,0.004214566,0.0000065040745,0.000005416623,0.000030683193,0.0010338759],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986338,0.0001905097,0.00043717487,0.00021058595,0.00020761183,0.00032031233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871737,0.0001767921,0.00032478923,0.0001204556,0.0004766258,0.00018395878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000472611,0.00019255083,0.0005406979,0.00021894465,0.0004535654,0.00006419579,0.00023734695,0.00009435623,0.000019082821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004358173,0.00016293842,0.00032428367,0.00016764733,0.0008697444,0.000098033095,0.00010615256,0.00045994314,0.00008237079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056536683,0.00009835184,0.00009363564,0.00017364183,0.0002622813,0.00001507163,0.50432396,0.0000063021216,0.000067252826,0.4840658,0.010312949,0.00052420085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023414125,0.001270628,0.0018996461,0.00011413475,0.0003808215,0.000113274844,0.17213295,0.000096763004,0.00002363155,0.53679234,0.2840307,0.0008036839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000485209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000025046324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5381537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029938772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009505331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66444355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388752012","doi":"10.3998/ergo.4656","title":"The Motivation Problem of Epistemic Expressivists","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Collège Montmorency","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Templeton World Charity Foundation; Université de Montréal","keywords":"Expressivism; Epistemology; Praise; Criticism; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.2396739129198414,"score_gpt":0.39749582501040454,"score_spread":0.15782191209056315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388752012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78104293,0.0009712607,0.00010532096,0.026273265,0.003053277,0.00088396727,0.00005863797,0.000065759166,0.18754558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958438,0.0002468016,0.000081959886,0.00020950113,0.0014987779,0.000009646204,0.000009251042,0.000024821915,0.0020754137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983557,0.0002499473,0.0007159113,0.00013788036,0.00035248254,0.00018807159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750865,0.0003968863,0.0011106159,0.0002823462,0.0006236055,0.000077882025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014258941,0.00013400339,0.00033343796,0.00014891602,0.00047902236,0.0008027331,0.0021047704,0.00005007533,0.00009653713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013380643,0.000086617336,0.00011890199,0.00012250042,0.0004309264,0.0023435156,0.00035617492,0.00033061043,0.000016453829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016468976,0.00014989694,0.00087113347,0.00016801877,0.00014812229,0.00001592539,0.012419498,0.00009441037,0.00082216255,0.97521675,0.007004915,0.0029244632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051470473,0.0003204116,0.0015900676,0.0002953672,0.000040541,0.000008763328,0.0009375114,0.000019898203,0.0007966058,0.97175735,0.023578744,0.00014002512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000063521526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007763557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2148009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022694336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012223177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77407736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388786092","doi":"10.1332/20437897y2023d000000022","title":"Decentring the Western perspective on knowledge: a reply to commentaries on ‘Building a cooperative child: evidence and lessons cross-culturally’ by Tanya Broesch and Erin Robbins","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Discourse","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Cultural knowledge; Psychology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06450200393729129,"score_gpt":0.3973585444825702,"score_spread":0.3328565405452789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388786092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8864379,0.001358729,0.000011550467,0.09699013,0.0005017798,0.0005232717,0.0004537718,0.00008258148,0.013640321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910965,0.00024850477,0.000010233219,0.0056207688,0.00023977403,0.000035970155,0.000013926071,0.000013791957,0.0027205176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860966,0.00016631391,0.00019795864,0.00046430752,0.00018470171,0.0003770761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898505,0.00034023452,0.000070793525,0.0002487833,0.00020571306,0.00014945203],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036907435,0.0002442704,0.0002575237,0.00004101174,0.0014516104,0.00081758026,0.00020875056,0.000047230173,0.000020764224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000317574,0.00015926255,0.000059338367,0.00010662213,0.0009764148,0.0003032417,0.00017500842,0.0002973958,0.00007070357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001314774,0.00012070303,0.003518733,0.000028965796,0.00012737092,0.000014221443,0.120802276,0.000071109025,0.00004562574,0.8394411,0.034852397,0.00084599986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025541985,0.0019794328,0.08212761,0.0027236585,0.0003295082,0.0000555925,0.32102782,0.00020159042,0.0006263683,0.011863107,0.57481915,0.001691977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055577825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036398403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.827578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020518861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000586013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388940084","doi":"10.32920/24624669","title":"Armchair Evaluative Knowledge and Sentimental Perceptualism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Social knowledge; Epistemology; Social psychology; Empirical research; Empirical evidence; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2161068861106995,"score_gpt":0.3675215643998273,"score_spread":0.1514146782891278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388940084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17011558,0.0028981562,0.0001397507,0.003151442,0.012141906,0.0011649907,0.00046877298,0.00079921994,0.8091202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5260201,0.00044738798,0.00019677106,0.0005431411,0.0027322958,0.00011211632,0.00033134717,0.00008440026,0.4695324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844307,0.00023426271,0.00030924557,0.0005499636,0.00020436502,0.00025911725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989927,0.00023881248,0.00012583743,0.00032437374,0.00023127029,0.000087046974],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006123203,0.00031685104,0.00044931116,0.00012331149,0.0003076689,0.00018571127,0.00018860478,0.00023489037,0.0020745646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003988235,0.00027172267,0.00018692287,0.0000150295255,0.0009878312,0.00007148634,0.00079599035,0.0007511628,0.001008055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009235516,0.00011967854,0.000059860144,0.00038747102,0.00034172172,0.0000067828587,0.4395675,0.000003763291,0.000026244552,0.5008384,0.057453997,0.0011853392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010448336,0.00022033282,0.0012058467,0.00049780187,0.000655823,0.0000067917304,0.14917392,0.0018981174,0.00017727439,0.44638184,0.39712602,0.0016114165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006806991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002941549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35590455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006413754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014028083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388946646","doi":"10.32920/24624669.v1","title":"Armchair Evaluative Knowledge and Sentimental Perceptualism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Empirical research; Empirical evidence; Social knowledge; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2161068861106995,"score_gpt":0.3675215643998273,"score_spread":0.1514146782891278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388946646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17011558,0.0028981562,0.0001397507,0.003151442,0.012141906,0.0011649907,0.00046877298,0.00079921994,0.8091202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5260201,0.00044738798,0.00019677106,0.0005431411,0.0027322958,0.00011211632,0.00033134717,0.00008440026,0.4695324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844307,0.00023426271,0.00030924557,0.0005499636,0.00020436502,0.00025911725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989927,0.00023881248,0.00012583743,0.00032437374,0.00023127029,0.000087046974],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006123203,0.00031685104,0.00044931116,0.00012331149,0.0003076689,0.00018571127,0.00018860478,0.00023489037,0.0020745646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003988235,0.00027172267,0.00018692287,0.0000150295255,0.0009878312,0.00007148634,0.00079599035,0.0007511628,0.001008055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009235516,0.00011967854,0.000059860144,0.00038747102,0.00034172172,0.0000067828587,0.4395675,0.000003763291,0.000026244552,0.5008384,0.057453997,0.0011853392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010448336,0.00022033282,0.0012058467,0.00049780187,0.000655823,0.0000067917304,0.14917392,0.0018981174,0.00017727439,0.44638184,0.39712602,0.0016114165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006806991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002941549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35590455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006413754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014028083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388976940","doi":"10.1017/epi.2023.57","title":"Echo Chambers and Friendship","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Echo (communications protocol); Friendship; Individualism; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.09795813894547933,"score_gpt":0.27666603838623116,"score_spread":0.17870789944075183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388976940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3213792,0.00041123977,0.000013563987,0.00520848,0.0023524312,0.00018915662,0.00004780153,0.00050351163,0.6698946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616157,0.000054266817,0.000035724246,0.00063067,0.00062481256,0.000016058442,0.00002469461,0.00002189796,0.036976174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918187,0.00006200505,0.00016981164,0.000206851,0.00012613881,0.00025335298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946755,0.00015524376,0.000055756493,0.00019796069,0.000050761777,0.000072712355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041304107,0.00011442869,0.00017646051,0.000059170838,0.00037522576,0.00011764243,0.00009061319,0.00005808822,0.00030757123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005490985,0.00010200008,0.00005922856,0.00004928322,0.00060695776,0.00011530146,0.0000511291,0.00016799856,0.0007343413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006212971,0.000015400006,0.0007178811,0.000108577624,0.000035226025,0.000021304963,0.043244667,0.0000014966386,0.00003842248,0.94422567,0.010322303,0.0012628359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025778275,0.00006241652,0.001403693,0.000030089057,0.000022264978,0.0000041260278,0.0057771467,0.00012666766,0.000048304417,0.078821145,0.91323125,0.00021509182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017765739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053777214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.902909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011239119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000231922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9438716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389001647","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04389-8","title":"A theory of advice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Absurdity; Extant taxon; Philosophy of language; Quality (philosophy); Agency (philosophy); Metaphysics; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08212697711355707,"score_gpt":0.27984905143614147,"score_spread":0.1977220743225844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389001647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25337696,0.00023251593,0.000019626417,0.00085367274,0.0010246516,0.00011009738,0.000055973353,0.00031029046,0.74401623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9507512,0.00002793879,0.000022512791,0.00017165435,0.0003034665,0.000008809026,0.0000042802026,0.000012776328,0.04869739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994678,0.00009459806,0.00012368734,0.00009361872,0.00009025943,0.00013006212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991442,0.00053081254,0.000051492738,0.00018660823,0.000063421285,0.000023451577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005330826,0.000060483133,0.00013140548,0.000061058025,0.0000774429,0.000012272219,0.00011391307,0.00003226348,0.0007867547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019529022,0.000048341622,0.00007228183,0.000036521393,0.00036650198,0.000054232667,0.00003048806,0.00008612959,0.0006204912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000113634915,0.000023636476,0.000045632125,0.00006504852,0.00003185174,0.0000035214323,0.03313328,0.0000010710036,0.0002343067,0.9599224,0.002917139,0.0036107993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014395922,0.00006237421,0.00035025593,0.00007543248,0.0000491689,0.0000011197458,0.031702045,0.00004550776,0.0016616106,0.3826814,0.58305585,0.00017125662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000918238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017221826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6973742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003703661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002031606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8614412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389397857","doi":"10.1017/can.2023.36","title":"On the Practical Significance of Irrelevant Factors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Scarborough; University of Toronto","keywords":"Worry; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Gray (unit); Subject (documents); Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.1705623482703091,"score_gpt":0.2948098967463087,"score_spread":0.12424754847599959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389397857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77096987,0.0002701791,0.000021052136,0.08194695,0.0047067753,0.00025771005,0.00021225878,0.000020960228,0.14159425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976757,0.000012411433,0.000010449201,0.00079417066,0.0008831256,0.0000011374856,0.0000021855587,0.000013634298,0.0006071879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911207,0.00011574799,0.00030021215,0.00007736373,0.00019259198,0.00020198895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982712,0.0008316946,0.00027139002,0.0001582153,0.00024650892,0.00022093627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049850123,0.00009653702,0.00020856404,0.0001867272,0.00022712909,0.000041618798,0.00020624818,0.00004671539,0.00041464117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005899938,0.0000606255,0.00015431279,0.00007142887,0.00065113895,0.000099297875,0.0000059025324,0.0004418691,0.00006617915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008889534,0.000012438957,0.00013667888,0.000019344574,0.000057627112,0.000061301274,0.0095128445,0.000011827948,0.000037759324,0.97468835,0.015387975,0.00006495799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018202998,0.00039951308,0.00067374296,0.00011184632,0.00005869439,0.000010720186,0.0037936727,0.000011883816,0.0003157135,0.8267802,0.16751884,0.00014312491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010596357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061538205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22670583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003765503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006436647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.454003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390018218","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4671269","title":"Increased Attention Decreases the Convincingness of Belief-Confirming Evidence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.1022727919626587,"score_gpt":0.3067043497290412,"score_spread":0.2044315577663825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390018218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9618562,0.023579529,0.0019877967,0.0041739778,0.004671039,0.00071906863,0.000054132874,0.00015960999,0.0027986818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833476,0.009257166,0.000014258691,0.0001504347,0.002105915,0.000027966536,0.000026486321,0.000056060027,0.005014101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996449,0.0005592497,0.0007432759,0.00034977883,0.0005009383,0.0013977597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968297,0.00096679875,0.0010455712,0.00048678866,0.0005951785,0.0000759744],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005529846,0.0003201577,0.0005514631,0.00017440456,0.0007169467,0.00021292485,0.0008102914,0.00020772876,0.00010484251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072912755,0.00023223837,0.00048763613,0.000053116153,0.00070676475,0.0001854191,0.00029339592,0.004579777,0.000040070692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010031017,0.00011022905,0.0012697672,0.00041821424,0.000992481,0.000010464513,0.008507296,0.00006529276,0.00032383908,0.98347294,0.00033413616,0.004395055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000507009,0.0003305667,0.0013658422,0.002139958,0.00090609427,0.00013619903,0.02855472,0.00013522954,0.0002049053,0.9613071,0.003872197,0.0005401789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006360174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021436928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022165814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041077804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040171957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390635778","doi":"10.1007/s11098-023-02088-1","title":"Epistemic blame as relationship modification: reply to Smartt","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Blame; Skepticism; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.31095522275474585,"score_gpt":0.3889637598222555,"score_spread":0.07800853706750965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390635778","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039750077,0.016281316,0.0001014461,0.7272216,0.0034626336,0.00050712685,0.00004847926,0.00067364186,0.21195365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781157,0.00022961268,0.000083262756,0.005881117,0.0036579818,0.00012950679,0.000013200446,0.000030655312,0.011858999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984684,0.000118513046,0.00041034073,0.00046993946,0.00027185353,0.00026092824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982317,0.001000386,0.00005154244,0.00034879713,0.00025733907,0.00011020068],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005065954,0.00020907802,0.00032882465,0.00011262509,0.00059696095,0.00015671045,0.00018077905,0.000073918454,0.00013352837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008395988,0.00016940845,0.000155663,0.00011441863,0.000704082,0.00016468721,0.00010465591,0.0004579549,0.002487089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014436589,0.000033698878,0.00008831757,0.00016754048,0.0001609948,0.000015546853,0.024486408,0.0000061013066,0.000013991476,0.9653391,0.009228732,0.0004451054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060518778,0.000087425826,0.00014194149,0.000110750116,0.00006838655,0.0000053651233,0.0011790524,0.000019350844,0.00001581327,0.7228214,0.27532145,0.00016851642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006610705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008685984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9383656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080878584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000447092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390720424","doi":"10.1017/9781108779968.004","title":"A Philosophically Informed Virtue Science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemic virtue; Epistemology; Generality; Aside; Philosophical methodology; Philosophy of science; Philosophical theory; Set (abstract data type); Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06155738962334452,"score_gpt":0.23521027692120794,"score_spread":0.17365288729786343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390720424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000056656347,0.0001842076,0.000013971741,0.00016564608,0.0015772982,0.00031327785,0.00040371154,0.00025629872,0.99702895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005996492,0.0000729398,0.000019179932,0.00035621313,0.0010026449,9.0125627e-7,0.000032569533,0.00005092925,0.9924681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983326,0.00001529418,0.00024603758,0.00059099833,0.00046228728,0.000352776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984656,0.00011623614,0.00018570547,0.0005727024,0.00044704607,0.00021268662],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022393957,0.00039793315,0.00044302715,0.0003788262,0.0006551183,0.00026728841,0.000828363,0.000305832,0.000025986914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025037934,0.00041288705,0.00030266552,0.0000077974,0.004827111,0.00024340933,0.0005516528,0.0010435955,0.00020497743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030916974,0.000007209266,6.1818945e-8,0.00024155734,0.0001221713,0.0001838055,0.0014060475,3.626007e-7,0.0000137658835,0.98799276,0.009756321,0.00024504666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021116548,0.00007985059,4.59599e-7,0.00028533925,0.0002834604,0.000008751437,0.00021021342,0.000019260397,0.000040630755,0.0057335002,0.992663,0.0004643501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001391642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004347484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9829067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023628258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064691954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390802113","doi":"10.1515/9780773585539-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill-Queen's University Press","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.02910638672481102,"score_gpt":0.22160526653351245,"score_spread":0.19249887980870142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390802113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025968295,0.000011001888,0.00004630829,0.0002453969,0.0035994437,0.00041879463,0.002805077,0.00012562542,0.9927224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008881778,0.000067303205,0.000067107234,0.0008123293,0.0013334109,0.000004260209,0.0005075745,0.00008899303,0.99623084],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767727,0.00030740374,0.0003406885,0.0007207176,0.0003447211,0.00060921436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983017,0.00012508997,0.0003923192,0.0007259557,0.00030763345,0.00014729564],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012936756,0.0006022493,0.00079865276,0.00024278645,0.0010124919,0.00014292424,0.0006999111,0.0006046616,0.0053209737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004266185,0.0006352663,0.00044632904,0.000008131772,0.00085534574,0.00017231499,0.0003673482,0.0010832003,0.0070819645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003874671,0.000049420094,0.0000017426742,0.00026206212,0.00019869562,0.000055198336,0.0012830154,0.000011648596,0.0000016088649,0.28536683,0.7126539,0.000077124525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049847126,0.000053582546,0.0000057061584,0.00013934809,0.00030510908,0.0000011280141,0.0004886415,0.0000020819455,0.00012212271,0.00026804398,0.99739707,0.00071871787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01830431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003478027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2850988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020670623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007224596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390820159","doi":"10.5430/wjel.v14n2p166","title":"A Philosophical Investigation of the Context Sensitivity of Know: Contextualism versus Semantic Minimalism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Journal of English Language","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Southwest University","keywords":"Contextualism; Minimalism (technical communication); Inference; Context (archaeology); Hierarchy; Epistemology; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Political science; History; Law; Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.04180750912442059,"score_gpt":0.2737510228664704,"score_spread":0.2319435137420498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390820159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97098655,0.005686099,0.000009444316,0.0026737934,0.0061315177,0.00012158823,0.000067841305,0.000022598226,0.014300597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99608284,0.000032954056,0.00002660303,0.00024083891,0.002516939,8.2604254e-7,0.0000028055083,0.000016624255,0.0010795778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849826,0.00039414284,0.00055642636,0.000108966895,0.00031039803,0.0001318133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975292,0.0011139704,0.0004025116,0.00018676055,0.0007091361,0.00005839322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011874817,0.00012807015,0.0003930663,0.00016763022,0.00006759812,0.00004645706,0.00015743151,0.00005968596,0.00010807465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011251274,0.00008644535,0.00032245778,0.00010650112,0.0008554621,0.00019271238,0.000043917848,0.0005416121,0.0000027553606],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014079163,0.000057265017,0.00010979731,0.00032884575,0.00029713876,0.00008443741,0.37065914,0.000003823507,0.0039480673,0.6199895,0.0024733513,0.0019078207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00936205,0.0017060011,0.0019235159,0.010479964,0.003130133,0.00013760323,0.40571383,0.0005789141,0.06648938,0.06337383,0.43565857,0.0014461906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016126542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024380884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5566157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002629552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012084194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35251388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391354115","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04445-3","title":"Don’t get it wrong! On understanding and its negative phenomena","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Philosophy of language; Epistemology; Explanatory power; Metaphysics; Phenomenology (philosophy); Relation (database); Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.1547436171822127,"score_gpt":0.29751868112655777,"score_spread":0.14277506394434508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391354115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056285314,0.0026313919,0.00013742562,0.0080073085,0.0022108986,0.0002987423,0.00012100441,0.00023457757,0.9300733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778187,0.00015164302,0.0000115658995,0.0005273765,0.0008367776,0.000011496358,0.0000030784624,0.000024590654,0.020614747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921876,0.00007363848,0.00013120829,0.00024505195,0.0001269119,0.00020439849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907154,0.00069594046,0.00002976621,0.00011846123,0.000027063239,0.000057206897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027758998,0.00013888537,0.00016550224,0.000083057465,0.00024185017,0.00020210049,0.00007636102,0.000050949613,0.00068801024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008582944,0.00010970756,0.00005567852,0.000025791975,0.00030003773,0.00017623318,0.00003203013,0.00024615027,0.00021407707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012389396,0.000019949568,0.0000039766833,0.00012916299,0.00007540268,0.000013785098,0.060844034,0.0000018723101,0.000051719137,0.9360294,0.001945065,0.0008732517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023409867,0.0002495875,0.000016268239,0.000570195,0.000109717876,0.0000050179874,0.07195261,0.0006646826,0.00066842925,0.3579469,0.5671419,0.00044060042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052007614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004738498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9215334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007604565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031379088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75332296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391639765","doi":"10.3998/ergo.5640","title":"Correction Notice for \"Epistemic Exploitation\" by Nora Berenstain (&lt;i&gt;Ergo&lt;/i&gt;, 2016, Vol. 3)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0967997716446078,"score_gpt":0.3566896205713321,"score_spread":0.2598898489267243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391639765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2020335,0.040991396,0.0237651,0.052633148,0.15647781,0.0058185477,0.0018735701,0.0006607236,0.51574624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95126706,0.00057224446,0.0005764211,0.0015573375,0.010651989,0.000081918704,0.00015277308,0.00014031162,0.03499994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728423,0.00031784282,0.0010862307,0.0004451331,0.00047942015,0.00038714206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629796,0.000807956,0.0007764038,0.00035158082,0.0015205689,0.00024556098],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016036413,0.00036275096,0.00069361035,0.00037572,0.0006791925,0.0028817335,0.001637377,0.00016921226,0.0007114025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004024903,0.00031406272,0.0003334587,0.00015486593,0.00039516273,0.005968113,0.00021984646,0.0006294813,0.00007759452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039349718,0.0003308495,0.000014328174,0.0003786459,0.0003814582,0.000031290183,0.010397313,0.000088882836,0.0020701995,0.5253177,0.45633438,0.0042614047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001011148,0.0010194118,0.000025312056,0.000704779,0.00032815585,0.000034037526,0.00086348166,0.0005920201,0.00053732644,0.39712363,0.5972535,0.00050722127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008175438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053057616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74923354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001588691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042472163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391759162","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-46367-9_10","title":"Reconstruction from Ultimate Scepticism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave companions.","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0723496848527052,"score_gpt":0.25737604629723915,"score_spread":0.18502636144453394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391759162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014498405,0.0031070868,0.00007624821,0.0004478851,0.009709335,0.0002663886,0.0010853467,0.0003403693,0.98482233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09311054,0.0009651922,0.00043884615,0.0005564276,0.0068633202,0.000026906,0.0014838693,0.00016046053,0.89639443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827707,0.000031495263,0.0005453739,0.0005978567,0.00026212164,0.0002861072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867916,0.00021622304,0.0002549259,0.0005099212,0.00022823288,0.00011154893],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016120517,0.00048347894,0.0006641907,0.00020586271,0.00033533748,0.00027949427,0.00025248065,0.00036321758,0.0075566666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015227833,0.0004499238,0.0004215248,0.000010672583,0.0009614022,0.000040507024,0.00009776504,0.0010772697,0.004090209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056708254,0.000006260238,0.0000030160816,0.00008001621,0.00036158322,0.000013859425,0.0048436103,9.238507e-7,0.000016619411,0.9843648,0.00559763,0.0047059925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000923364,0.00002562083,0.0000075155604,0.00037181212,0.00033754852,0.0000084844405,0.00031998297,0.000057268284,0.000008995875,0.5879585,0.41048738,0.00032456065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032910795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010167623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40488973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007567837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006696436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391907095","doi":"10.56526/10451/60012","title":"A self-descriptionist theory of knowledge","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kairos","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Self-knowledge; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08286822144446326,"score_gpt":0.2710002206976556,"score_spread":0.18813199925319235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391907095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09236327,0.0027775874,0.00013166294,0.00013221847,0.0024354612,0.0001536109,0.000025874804,0.00014558122,0.9018347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674102,0.000021096357,0.00016482302,0.00014115483,0.001088208,0.000010038387,0.0000055223572,0.0000132149,0.03114575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940807,0.00010502986,0.00015370155,0.00007823858,0.00006820315,0.0001867443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995193,0.00009989566,0.00006840566,0.00017335067,0.000088423534,0.000050618157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043351058,0.0000823279,0.00014816559,0.00003354975,0.00018076407,0.000022219338,0.00009357597,0.000047596837,0.0005255093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002717844,0.00006886617,0.00008625048,0.00001625427,0.0003817247,0.00014863694,0.000027490321,0.000118282056,0.00033918972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005323083,0.00022403184,0.00058963895,0.00009738974,0.00003210806,1.602429e-7,0.08229293,3.2469494e-8,0.00013440452,0.9132694,0.0027175522,0.00063702103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020406085,0.00005062127,0.0012326002,0.000019300893,0.0000653638,0.0000018614729,0.0047597326,0.000005413208,0.000699896,0.039689068,0.95313925,0.00013286351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022117187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009024989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9504217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015411562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026743566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5753958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392292889","doi":"10.1017/epi.2024.6","title":"Epistemic Complicity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Wrongdoing; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Philosophy; Collective responsibility; Sociology; Political science; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.14379891357584362,"score_gpt":0.29538249379222126,"score_spread":0.15158358021637763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392292889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31758964,0.00024227204,0.000094235154,0.009756185,0.0038216878,0.00038649776,0.00014513305,0.0013507941,0.6666136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84294677,0.000029969257,0.000033660104,0.00093095045,0.0011570493,0.000031452386,0.000088439665,0.00003432387,0.15474737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861646,0.0001256368,0.00033690393,0.00029540283,0.00022383193,0.00040179654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903595,0.00023472225,0.00011377692,0.00039906052,0.00012305295,0.00009344798],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005799577,0.00017778508,0.00030688572,0.00011225275,0.00047199792,0.00009979155,0.00027198755,0.00007784986,0.00071306655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006606199,0.00016242596,0.0001633367,0.000090764006,0.0006086804,0.00013599293,0.00008439338,0.00026808813,0.005714576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007003583,0.000034586097,0.00044707526,0.00013408589,0.000042388187,0.000014404429,0.009118919,0.0000049402433,0.00046935605,0.9420704,0.0470536,0.00060320983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033335589,0.000068334026,0.0011285777,0.00004505285,0.00002651187,0.000005333898,0.002702138,0.0001549439,0.0003382271,0.072119236,0.92273265,0.00034561948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033490357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073698955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8756791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003688044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035506288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392672923","doi":"10.1086/728629","title":":<i>Bias: A Philosophical Study</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.32545378093771543,"score_gpt":0.3729506229512032,"score_spread":0.04749684201348775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392672923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13739707,0.005439529,0.00028009628,0.17367443,0.017463617,0.0009314505,0.0001134229,0.0017309965,0.66296935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975879,0.00006744918,0.000039767932,0.003982127,0.0036827247,0.00002494889,0.000008959895,0.000037645,0.016277337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984809,0.00031207115,0.0002633166,0.00032227024,0.00038583376,0.00023556408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821496,0.0012249564,0.000032912285,0.00029344228,0.00016107837,0.00007263151],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001701714,0.00016515957,0.00021738949,0.00007540662,0.00039395367,0.00032494063,0.00019869319,0.00020659802,0.0005201809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036642308,0.00013413497,0.00013993763,0.000053210348,0.000642073,0.0001572429,0.000068252,0.002295282,0.00089049677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050485187,0.00011760697,0.000033432432,0.0001188714,0.00007068895,0.00006061702,0.19407575,8.600319e-7,0.000009139842,0.80139667,0.003590739,0.00052060914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013216957,0.00019576737,0.000019536259,0.000065295564,0.00007474993,0.000004678373,0.009650679,0.00005102219,0.00001947132,0.31449258,0.67511016,0.00018390692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013874471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090017536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83848196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022055043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018528741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392782479","doi":"10.1080/00048402.2024.2310193","title":"Ambiguity Tests, Polysemy, and Copredication","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Polysemy; Ambiguity; Epistemology; Prima facie; Causation; Argument (complex analysis); Term (time); Vagueness; Philosophy; Phenomenon; Linguistics; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of language; Psychology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.06406636689470722,"score_gpt":0.2962612529781869,"score_spread":0.23219488608347966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392782479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58171946,0.014723369,0.00038374477,0.11270391,0.011085654,0.00042340072,0.00017355809,0.00025450124,0.2785324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946071,0.00012874517,0.00018282906,0.00025296587,0.003553548,0.0000010457447,0.0000033138276,0.000016308906,0.0012541331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991126,0.00005988832,0.00036169766,0.00012530896,0.00019629658,0.00014420149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938524,0.00009094499,0.00015451202,0.0001096987,0.00013770573,0.00012191653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037796673,0.00012073936,0.0002087736,0.00015357876,0.00012561608,0.00017195284,0.00013432182,0.00006714671,0.00016162195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044018343,0.000096882875,0.00012361027,0.000042195505,0.0004921227,0.00038815025,0.000017883945,0.00046060467,0.00004597662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001871244,0.00007279094,0.0005526456,0.00024987973,0.00019738628,0.00011489372,0.012494113,0.0000011713402,0.00041545666,0.9667731,0.009197577,0.009912271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038490602,0.0005808546,0.002488644,0.00047411514,0.00025613027,0.0003352684,0.0008069056,0.000021762815,0.00029235528,0.79869044,0.19543801,0.00023058547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001435466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016176053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41288763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021467851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007380473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3950769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392877232","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i1.8183","title":"The Distinctiveness Problem of Analogical Arguments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; Sun Yat-sen University","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Analogical reasoning; Epistemology; Psychology; Analogy; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.058694777136298205,"score_gpt":0.28215423052417177,"score_spread":0.22345945338787357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392877232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08326436,0.001221017,0.00033220692,0.0007148978,0.0014142467,0.00026236635,0.00005843322,0.0001342603,0.9125982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925318,0.000047241614,0.000045785997,0.00018215294,0.0002599453,0.00001870627,0.000012870101,0.000005288471,0.0068962616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929905,0.00003397594,0.00025109662,0.0000892176,0.00014254072,0.00018410425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994964,0.00021951442,0.00005916097,0.0001131913,0.000084123516,0.00002761363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037739228,0.00009047293,0.00012707195,0.00002759308,0.00026248043,0.00013219105,0.00016828097,0.000045373366,0.00017998007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023316394,0.000047196896,0.00009662162,0.000033264543,0.00062454154,0.0001928202,0.000057714387,0.0001960877,0.000108287444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014087092,0.000018692885,0.00015867263,0.000096164804,0.000041092466,0.000004247953,0.0049923477,0.000008830338,0.000008827811,0.9858814,0.00032816685,0.00844748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001007649,0.00019767274,0.0012593701,0.000049133763,0.00003114853,0.000004433162,0.0017232386,0.00016452753,0.00007666371,0.14321701,0.85305953,0.000116529445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046627905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012353057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90926737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010490715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038812144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23011494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392877428","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i1.8222","title":"What Makes an Argument Strong?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09379951201748599,"score_gpt":0.3052495666163226,"score_spread":0.2114500545988366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392877428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19243474,0.0041000876,0.00015894929,0.0016227228,0.012391205,0.00029827948,0.000049265505,0.00060263183,0.7883421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673272,0.00019968628,0.0000731471,0.0020268392,0.0013467042,0.00001865872,0.00005737579,0.000013487585,0.028936924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999242,0.000023019571,0.00020521335,0.00013351438,0.00014571185,0.0002505537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963206,0.00004733933,0.000033200737,0.00017234754,0.000052777865,0.00006225614],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024015814,0.00012616553,0.00013164594,0.000062351035,0.00017666494,0.00084991066,0.00014410092,0.00006253088,0.0010467892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000756872,0.00009300329,0.00008611898,0.00001951528,0.00026092757,0.0014524651,0.00003905309,0.00024081262,0.0006766092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005858285,0.000022484952,0.000015552865,0.00007381193,0.000027756252,0.0000130603385,0.03281522,0.000016723106,0.0000064042792,0.9469644,0.00064459926,0.019394156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009132137,0.00027655606,0.00006521202,0.00005574387,0.000026806121,0.0000072220996,0.020715171,0.000394141,0.00007073083,0.024859823,0.9532569,0.00018038278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004763339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000475072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9526123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016794284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004216418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392927328","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2307336","title":"Reorienting Clifford’s evidentialism: returning to social trust","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11515375989045752,"score_gpt":0.2998163492941909,"score_spread":0.18466258940373337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392927328","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087814614,0.24585123,0.005103279,0.044141866,0.3113542,0.0022523748,0.00094983017,0.00059569953,0.30193692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87869257,0.00035257696,0.00030223245,0.0017779195,0.028199486,0.000038165657,0.000013739072,0.00009854286,0.090524785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986713,0.0001001312,0.00048616866,0.00019572912,0.00029403446,0.00025263906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990609,0.00024537803,0.00020914899,0.000108808716,0.0003001666,0.00007556267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013411819,0.00012972216,0.00027614416,0.00012003122,0.0012539543,0.00026964993,0.00032482416,0.000068780784,0.00029143292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019220125,0.00012492175,0.00048027807,0.000037298323,0.0005546209,0.00030261354,0.00004396453,0.00059904373,0.00002091035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006534829,0.0000600681,0.0000032134815,0.00044978168,0.00024909573,0.000075506156,0.084846914,0.0000044935714,0.0002577609,0.52326876,0.36641994,0.024299104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002074901,0.000083720806,0.000009469804,0.0004661862,0.00016213386,0.00016683925,0.00111653,0.00003081043,0.000009323171,0.13607994,0.8615244,0.00014317871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014474698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012162834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79087794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023846545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014780847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9644529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393031669","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4735851","title":"A.I. and the Nature of Disagreement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.013432177817925247,"score_gpt":0.2514620363788881,"score_spread":0.23802985856096284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393031669","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3623332,0.44411278,0.0011404332,0.04871566,0.0060285316,0.00047993005,0.000026700955,0.00009603991,0.1370667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98042184,0.006623368,0.0000041430544,0.00021334828,0.0008801491,0.0000019603865,0.0000010033491,0.000008834744,0.01184538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990429,0.000079378115,0.00015805675,0.00008239609,0.00013446614,0.0005027772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996581,0.00013961855,0.000053326752,0.000078808764,0.000051209114,0.000018901948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015656427,0.00007370687,0.00012871726,0.000036225214,0.00019707736,0.000094014584,0.00011367376,0.00004707377,0.00005881063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002586975,0.000039261096,0.00009886869,0.000019669307,0.00050990307,0.00008660083,0.00002110342,0.002047144,0.000007074537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021146696,0.0000095489495,0.000014841327,0.000024560495,0.00018500438,0.0000010286273,0.0085573355,3.8952174e-7,0.000010948332,0.98524857,0.0003514705,0.0055751535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029875772,0.00008948681,0.000012832098,0.00003357217,0.00007778586,0.00006093161,0.008920895,0.000029764216,0.000017706432,0.8647842,0.12562181,0.000052304982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052597745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001863015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6180886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056986944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003510908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8893937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393347039","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-52585-8_10","title":"A Foundational Scepticism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1028139080989273,"score_gpt":0.27289003458483996,"score_spread":0.17007612648591264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393347039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000019463464,0.00058384,0.000025880701,0.0012687529,0.0032426638,0.00010925693,0.00009409394,0.00015063901,0.9945229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005394047,0.00006839131,0.0000694396,0.0012684374,0.004133606,0.000006493421,0.00017011334,0.000056016248,0.9936881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991582,0.0000047171734,0.00023462121,0.0002636577,0.00020652564,0.0001322571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994554,0.000094486255,0.00006656789,0.00019518452,0.00014591552,0.000042447737],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011820382,0.00021842142,0.00025033692,0.000099507626,0.00015011069,0.00019270675,0.00011923152,0.00018519838,0.0424085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005877297,0.0001781477,0.00022233718,0.0000023080433,0.0005986621,0.000060395098,0.00005304783,0.0004893506,0.012318293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016169847,0.0000052856685,5.0298073e-8,0.00008401436,0.0001249629,0.000009235834,0.0028603307,9.201968e-8,5.513236e-7,0.9435688,0.052616697,0.0007283132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023838002,0.000016890584,7.7418804e-8,0.00004738929,0.00006227102,0.0000016544521,0.000077537254,0.0000031575073,4.211229e-7,0.4766712,0.52297795,0.00011763031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004521952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001173469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47036126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031243402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000877443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394052408","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10373125","title":"Increased Attention Decreases the Convincingness of Belief-Confirming Evidence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.1374469288259309,"score_gpt":0.2957793859990915,"score_spread":0.15833245717316058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394052408","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019770674,0.00048696258,0.000049259368,0.0008004675,0.000896058,0.0008327059,0.9844141,0.0005235478,0.0100198435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007764707,0.00074938353,0.000009513659,0.0002659399,0.00079732074,2.3552582e-7,0.98756266,0.0009516257,0.0018985905],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974388,0.0008319557,0.0004623853,0.00041771712,0.0005226982,0.0003264454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971687,0.00039631946,0.00044074995,0.0007841174,0.0011057557,0.00010434668],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017306724,0.00022805714,0.00033124542,0.00024033299,0.0028654246,0.0007008391,0.0014690637,0.00012841797,0.0069754673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027253993,0.00019058108,0.00014196253,0.00018520198,0.0010877139,0.0002297767,0.0010062497,0.00057324505,0.00911303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003749641,0.000081105136,3.5966423e-7,0.0005243346,0.000100713674,0.000010611181,0.001569933,0.0000023721798,0.00011461784,0.0060993,0.9893639,0.0020952635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018816376,0.00015680643,0.000062854175,0.00044657761,0.00014145518,0.000017981953,0.0016838048,0.000014687978,0.00003280719,0.00029343032,0.99676156,0.00019986025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00232202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008552425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008121253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075476164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001824915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843815","doi":"10.4000/aad.8119","title":"Michael A. Gilbert: Not arguing logically is not illogical: Other ways of communicating arguments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.126980649537492,"score_gpt":0.3387212657828483,"score_spread":0.21174061624535628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394843815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77914953,0.00070230244,0.0030752555,0.12515374,0.001022711,0.00060067594,0.0003326668,0.00032320403,0.08963991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96763605,0.00013964828,0.00087076455,0.028785901,0.00025859888,0.000029092642,0.00012415215,0.000038883114,0.002116895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802506,0.00024086336,0.00065518735,0.00038334544,0.0003972196,0.0002983033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859476,0.00048120413,0.00028859198,0.00040840195,0.00015827762,0.00006874324],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077116163,0.00025536813,0.00039660616,0.00016751906,0.00029181858,0.00025337096,0.00035844877,0.00010123501,0.00122108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006732406,0.00020266356,0.00031718088,0.000105451516,0.0005782718,0.0004432698,0.00010265595,0.00041686255,0.00013273623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036827994,0.000275597,0.0010957364,0.0001644504,0.000736975,0.000017227787,0.13467331,0.00007942223,0.0059513142,0.8504384,0.004139887,0.002390817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00406706,0.0011226421,0.0035531526,0.0015885876,0.0036501724,0.000029731747,0.21606202,0.017571975,0.04334628,0.23330314,0.472346,0.0033592302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066445296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005225812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6171353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048497077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004479654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394876917","doi":"10.5406/21521123.61.2.01","title":"Evidence and Emotions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Proposition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.09464240576296391,"score_gpt":0.3074725949150349,"score_spread":0.21283018915207103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394876917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5816678,0.0076873223,0.00094011874,0.29271638,0.0032006523,0.0004975149,0.00011752452,0.001202764,0.11196996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953037,0.00011601608,0.00011874331,0.0016105463,0.0018225064,0.000017479551,0.0000044975395,0.000022784589,0.0009837438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989439,0.00010456007,0.00021383249,0.00034653654,0.00016464763,0.00022650913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904835,0.00050271436,0.00004264398,0.00021770672,0.00006368351,0.00012489068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018728645,0.00015382165,0.00023461231,0.00008487026,0.00021708134,0.00025135133,0.00012358568,0.000037483693,0.00022121379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039567505,0.00012818298,0.00009875959,0.00007999512,0.002273506,0.0003016579,0.000015746828,0.0003739025,0.00031049197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005284712,0.000032970012,0.000023604745,0.000055013712,0.000039799772,0.000022323973,0.016790891,9.349819e-8,0.000059609094,0.9394349,0.0006864484,0.0428491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081475875,0.0015348472,0.0005468172,0.00025982695,0.00009903952,0.000028635763,0.0033517075,0.00023378234,0.000004147342,0.9154705,0.078060694,0.00032856385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028982287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014989729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41363594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015779171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040321607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8376827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395010243","doi":"10.1017/epi.2024.17","title":"Deep Agreements","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Business","score_opus":0.06704883959129587,"score_gpt":0.2843049394522583,"score_spread":0.21725609986096245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395010243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010541747,0.0051680095,0.0007310721,0.0036160438,0.008414683,0.00020452352,0.000026003292,0.00042801147,0.9708699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8281415,0.000045366764,0.00009293286,0.00081644865,0.0020867332,0.000020092479,0.00002534751,0.000028840162,0.16874273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912125,0.000055062053,0.00020992554,0.00022620111,0.00016415108,0.00022340323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995494,0.000098953016,0.000030365934,0.00021099599,0.000055609857,0.000054694134],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026457044,0.00012374356,0.00015327416,0.00006455176,0.00019156947,0.00021397829,0.00014189168,0.000048639424,0.0022786313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020699794,0.00010311773,0.00011990955,0.000030291038,0.0002921629,0.00017096392,0.000036787045,0.00020096598,0.0027660585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002543852,0.000025955844,0.000044906596,0.00019641223,0.00007576781,0.00003373614,0.018991727,0.0000013737556,0.000038394886,0.95761317,0.01838475,0.004591249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008144882,0.000042757954,0.000048060836,0.00006301363,0.000033893066,0.0000032452779,0.0010986287,0.00029421895,0.000046968456,0.039727766,0.95841694,0.00014308676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012517198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075371144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9400322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029937008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003066298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99863344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396628435","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-443-13829-4.00009-x","title":"The fundamental problem","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04307051387976071,"score_gpt":0.25265588186852367,"score_spread":0.20958536798876296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396628435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000037558877,0.0075492314,9.524982e-8,0.0006739912,0.0031282876,0.00046246487,0.00010952306,0.00013554913,0.9879371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00019287303,0.00034851092,0.000015610229,0.00057987083,0.0028955392,0.00005359085,0.000027656113,0.00011637341,0.99577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860144,0.000023686835,0.0004092561,0.0003706033,0.0002875158,0.00030748427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990532,0.00015065192,0.00017178181,0.00045066027,0.00010406639,0.00006967995],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034350881,0.0003663859,0.00036998547,0.000079687816,0.00079954934,0.00067498,0.00032992783,0.00020916689,0.0007199358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004079888,0.00024730107,0.00038925445,0.000002334323,0.0015624259,0.0000347667,0.000153914,0.0010082202,0.0024865253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003555714,0.0000025527863,5.8281277e-8,0.00011377994,0.00016379643,0.000011918919,0.0051907115,1.501169e-8,7.2584e-7,0.64090526,0.0024344383,0.35117316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043741275,0.00003886512,5.7525774e-8,0.00019646026,0.00012719196,0.0000043303867,0.00018784705,4.0038037e-7,0.0000013704216,0.37747252,0.62173545,0.00019175904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000074026625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029480702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.619301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081412414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001246984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396791295","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/34rza","title":"Meta-judgment: Meta-theories and beliefs about good judgment across societies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Meta-analysis; Clinical judgment; Epistemology; Social psychology; Metatheory; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.1800362454699678,"score_gpt":0.32422441242751204,"score_spread":0.14418816695754424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396791295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012102933,0.2872307,0.00022013609,0.021387314,0.012803126,0.0019777631,0.0047848304,0.0013082465,0.65818495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23220812,0.008154214,0.0010780216,0.006569764,0.003789491,0.0013820298,0.00030107328,0.0002460301,0.74627125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963602,0.00026813065,0.00089363725,0.0011575847,0.0005990619,0.00072140683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978741,0.00041524103,0.00034898316,0.00087544566,0.00032406373,0.00016217043],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018316014,0.0009704424,0.0021628938,0.00009808791,0.0008504334,0.0016889957,0.000502172,0.00053645216,0.0031302993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034984747,0.0006560542,0.0019301941,0.00003494404,0.0024602355,0.00016191894,0.0023100495,0.0019199018,0.0002155695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008622718,0.00008549997,0.0000035474943,0.0018248374,0.03728643,0.000008837599,0.115513206,0.000010237787,0.000006150666,0.83256304,0.012401823,0.0002877608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016556801,0.000080142076,0.000006723909,0.00007209317,0.022890156,0.0000033741255,0.019723864,0.000011022254,0.00035627835,0.6532228,0.30278283,0.0006851791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008341864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00239619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29038098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006795852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015889759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397012953","doi":"10.1007/s11153-024-09914-4","title":"Book symposium: Patrick Todd, The open future: why future contingents are all false. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021. 224 pp. $80.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of religion; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.05382649079618494,"score_gpt":0.2841327138678885,"score_spread":0.23030622307170356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397012953","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026399004,0.28465816,0.0011603324,0.5234844,0.06372764,0.0019330095,0.0011678208,0.0001483415,0.121080376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1862694,0.40895918,0.000936309,0.04046507,0.19869868,0.000032170643,0.00060142967,0.0002868964,0.16375086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985161,0.00009755048,0.0004096255,0.00027384103,0.00049026136,0.00021261128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998498,0.00016458485,0.0004398195,0.00019082864,0.00059867173,0.00010806392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037536424,0.00021649711,0.00028030408,0.00011357932,0.0003608859,0.00063264655,0.0012483703,0.00013522996,0.00012778389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019482275,0.00016029479,0.00043146947,0.00004135417,0.00016547546,0.00069088157,0.00018959364,0.000554769,0.000009056583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020823155,0.00004680521,0.000019823707,0.000042242857,0.00046541897,0.000030270998,0.0020811528,0.000013346072,0.00001710989,0.3724332,0.62371147,0.0009309137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006436135,0.00014078431,0.000008816314,0.00022983953,0.00015568356,0.000040861996,0.0005613306,0.000034447974,0.00005906455,0.09031705,0.9076441,0.00016440608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028380702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000093629475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48301932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010678679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013781319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65366316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397023067","doi":"10.1038/d41586-024-01478-7","title":"Daniel Dennett obituary: ‘New atheism’ philosopher who sparked debate on consciousness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Atheism; Consciousness; Philosophy; Obituary; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.03862181159439163,"score_gpt":0.2777593416201284,"score_spread":0.23913753002573676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397023067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062199418,0.021528525,0.00004936887,0.03594049,0.014511934,0.00053971313,0.00019145815,0.00081286253,0.8642262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73983026,0.00014096145,0.000047089205,0.0108456295,0.0055066766,0.000010145051,0.00004659737,0.00006453975,0.24350807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875766,0.00007693258,0.00019545175,0.00040708767,0.0002555306,0.0003073402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991457,0.00026426234,0.000050359587,0.00033011273,0.00010298526,0.00010658317],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022761812,0.00025560622,0.00029539102,0.00009255452,0.00024451385,0.00024476746,0.00025796363,0.000814205,0.0005703468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058406316,0.0001976968,0.00017563518,0.00006338337,0.00031313195,0.0001640243,0.00004325305,0.0028012013,0.0005099405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002323782,0.000033003358,0.000010315224,0.000090723,0.00010109416,0.00006859382,0.00869318,0.0000026466953,0.0000565137,0.7837419,0.2057577,0.0014211157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021349009,0.000074141644,0.000024787878,0.00019531758,0.00007043834,0.0000089161695,0.00030447915,0.000055255976,0.00023025203,0.14832532,0.85025764,0.00023997485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000096730844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008161173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67763084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000363101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001286023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398254997","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192896278.001.0001","title":"The Fundamentals of Reasons","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.07454060258095942,"score_gpt":0.2791117726853412,"score_spread":0.2045711701043818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398254997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000069821913,0.005223585,0.0000016479238,0.0010952293,0.002518319,0.00013980683,0.00015352937,0.000055327102,0.99080557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00040354452,0.0005511781,0.0000089766545,0.000317672,0.0013261628,0.000009137854,0.00004326672,0.00003254584,0.99730754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999243,0.00003318826,0.00025544214,0.0001587347,0.00017084298,0.00013879575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990612,0.00038837563,0.000120307785,0.0003082536,0.000095492476,0.000026349842],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029901537,0.00015555703,0.0002632684,0.000036093912,0.00021803542,0.00012009704,0.00021085165,0.00012490203,0.0015205166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016168953,0.00008840205,0.00024013042,0.000005609824,0.0011544339,0.00002789854,0.00007276883,0.00040229037,0.0006463859],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013461014,0.000004709038,1.4351862e-7,0.00009778928,0.00010195252,0.0000011582262,0.0028173802,1.1911029e-8,5.995907e-7,0.58816594,0.4082798,0.00052916794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002174911,0.000029252025,2.1430024e-7,0.00009518834,0.00008996348,7.067222e-7,0.00100915,4.2266674e-7,0.000007238846,0.2755511,0.72311807,0.0000769111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009104142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023634734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3148383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003386269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021548085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399010122","doi":"10.1093/analys/anad100","title":"If epistemic partialism is true, don’t tell your friends","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.057890290552340254,"score_gpt":0.3020855116151529,"score_spread":0.24419522106281266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399010122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43942398,0.014831085,0.0014808208,0.021357413,0.005380279,0.00032302848,0.00063433946,0.00097642484,0.51559263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9105206,0.0002477867,0.00002872183,0.001148857,0.0014312748,0.000015131011,0.0000782811,0.000025666475,0.0865037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985122,0.00010107941,0.00038305376,0.0004327014,0.00025104175,0.0003199061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910516,0.00014892696,0.000079382255,0.00046101748,0.00011216771,0.000093326154],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040041047,0.00020571888,0.0004495007,0.0003431444,0.00028514318,0.00034542382,0.0002175055,0.00011030333,0.0057850676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001822443,0.00017046713,0.0007179175,0.00033450665,0.0003410944,0.00021020081,0.000044469885,0.0003003066,0.00077909103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012050498,0.00010286368,0.0015198156,0.0002081128,0.0078557255,0.00008169582,0.13168511,0.000057236055,0.00019283843,0.80810386,0.045934316,0.004246358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010874903,0.00004409699,0.00014197329,0.000029688617,0.005625536,0.0000019813672,0.0053021926,0.002253773,0.00035431492,0.029564042,0.9562244,0.00034929923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016770457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001981623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91029006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034597364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004957857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399214606","doi":"10.1007/s13194-024-00583-8","title":"Overdetermination, underdetermination, and epistemic granularity in the historical sciences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Underdetermination; Overdetermination; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Granularity; Quine; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.12991325091226683,"score_gpt":0.3202747933627813,"score_spread":0.19036154245051448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399214606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67635006,0.005700563,0.0015784818,0.058706995,0.009015754,0.00063768483,0.000031030257,0.00010578327,0.24787368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986664,0.000045213783,0.00017519656,0.00020836182,0.00058435666,0.0000015340705,2.6359297e-7,0.000008445164,0.00031023534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986005,0.00024217961,0.00031512917,0.00020730268,0.00046842895,0.00016649671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992224,0.00027816027,0.000115865856,0.000095404255,0.00024591023,0.000042251602],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008650508,0.000083516694,0.00011356024,0.0002830791,0.0008721125,0.00036825688,0.0004953235,0.000010738614,0.0000044903054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002667715,0.00005458731,0.00006628059,0.00018224737,0.0038768556,0.0005849927,0.000034967517,0.00023730243,0.0000019727763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035974747,0.00003207055,0.00006438925,0.0000814126,0.0000032836099,0.0000139983495,0.02566939,0.0000038262524,0.00017486655,0.9687532,0.00046921187,0.004730712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027234404,0.0004911764,0.0017157856,0.00023234356,0.00003482365,0.0001472231,0.0019413634,0.00079678465,0.00005554447,0.93368167,0.060469,0.00016196916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008647903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011029191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32231635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007842838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012981122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400595737","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v17i1.876","title":"The Hard Things about Hard Choices? A Reply to Chang","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.08733137235003517,"score_gpt":0.2796765872030998,"score_spread":0.1923452148530646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400595737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37610844,0.03208556,0.0005583378,0.31619415,0.059556402,0.00182824,0.00065203157,0.00035552165,0.21266133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79052633,0.013620413,0.0014610788,0.065408595,0.061683327,0.00020609447,0.000046192697,0.00025695705,0.066791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988787,0.000034979603,0.00040909566,0.00027647172,0.000062045256,0.00033870767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903005,0.00036346808,0.00013922258,0.00019212117,0.00010252104,0.00017262984],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010434161,0.00019147992,0.00026066854,0.00010304501,0.0017148892,0.001598888,0.00023744753,0.000066684726,0.00007015395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007390805,0.00013862703,0.0002425805,0.000020971393,0.00023567094,0.0006073465,0.000050197556,0.0005000571,0.00007122301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007442257,0.000013711977,0.000009232372,0.000097356264,0.00020176006,0.0000050912154,0.023383342,0.000014238896,0.000010110868,0.9535445,0.014205202,0.0084410375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015987176,0.00012926578,0.000013784081,0.00007513338,0.00004048876,0.0000401699,0.0005052637,0.00022397473,0.00001509654,0.31645244,0.6822049,0.00013963993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031161602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008229468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6679997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053158292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006340254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400778818","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2024.2376940","title":"Conceptual engineering, cognitive deficiency, and the foundations of conceptual inquiry","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Management science; Cognitive science; Engineering; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.11917328364700132,"score_gpt":0.3156778693292747,"score_spread":0.1965045856822734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400778818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9311279,0.015113144,0.0038143273,0.0010172919,0.008673188,0.00051491446,0.00013797844,0.00023075241,0.039370496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724776,0.000093967756,0.00002599477,0.00024374359,0.0012417558,0.000027794007,0.000020382884,0.000016252703,0.0010823819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991645,0.000084109764,0.00024672257,0.00019133,0.00014594824,0.0001673559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842954,0.0012204195,0.000054656244,0.00012079123,0.00013980365,0.000034771172],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037846877,0.00012630678,0.0002098077,0.00006275434,0.00020606152,0.00009163149,0.00010878423,0.00006186554,0.000252356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019639057,0.00008786983,0.000088514775,0.00004755071,0.012542403,0.00017865143,0.000058285154,0.00025896382,0.00004862789],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009667315,0.00001281947,0.000011928243,0.00003107996,0.00004248643,0.000002166311,0.32929918,0.000004439459,0.000021954236,0.6694736,0.0007346246,0.0003560482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017116293,0.0002927406,0.0002530827,0.00034489966,0.0003749381,0.000022142842,0.66113484,0.000718399,0.00032886668,0.02155094,0.3128146,0.00045291122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000704162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053583793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64792264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010584535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006997872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9901449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400797778","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192890580.001.0001","title":"Epistemic Blame","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06744904619528803,"score_gpt":0.25976240961485586,"score_spread":0.19231336341956784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400797778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000049082823,0.003595064,0.000008289493,0.001559413,0.0055157235,0.00017859922,0.00012455689,0.00035171577,0.9886617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00023001149,0.00020981806,0.000021146101,0.0014763359,0.006063598,0.000014699091,0.00017223103,0.00009601212,0.99171615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987552,0.00003290141,0.0003471972,0.00039576873,0.00021535327,0.00025356666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991397,0.00016579307,0.00010533132,0.0003985231,0.00012531746,0.00006533851],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002251391,0.00032882852,0.00047685739,0.00012609274,0.00014138588,0.00021807518,0.0002539413,0.00034253896,0.0072513977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013134364,0.0002611365,0.00035050832,0.000008070756,0.00075348,0.00006468127,0.00008831285,0.0009674461,0.012444327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010264325,0.000005421447,6.569156e-8,0.0003200273,0.00008666461,0.000016156237,0.004042404,4.098385e-8,6.034044e-7,0.56753516,0.42764446,0.0003479694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032295964,0.000026196138,5.1312227e-8,0.00015519682,0.00011425209,0.0000035151695,0.0002412611,0.0000019106105,0.0000020216457,0.39705563,0.6021668,0.00020086068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000080973085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013292362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17452234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009705128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035730802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401053144","doi":"10.1007/s11229-024-04687-9","title":"Inquiry and reasons","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10021976976895125,"score_gpt":0.30234733478125514,"score_spread":0.2021275650123039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401053144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3258723,0.0115759745,0.000092410424,0.007360472,0.005694127,0.00017730537,0.000063900174,0.00048412374,0.6486794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748809,0.00012619772,0.000041315576,0.0002488513,0.0012232392,0.000008244894,0.0000026020339,0.000014762946,0.023453895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995677,0.00003852584,0.0000760408,0.00014211956,0.00006048354,0.00011511866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995618,0.00024872876,0.000010743131,0.000119672055,0.000021502705,0.000037544432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020297938,0.00006967494,0.000093521216,0.000040844192,0.000107195425,0.00013500555,0.000050533523,0.000036810965,0.00043485532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006822157,0.000053957727,0.000040498242,0.000013567987,0.00047642027,0.00010823051,0.000025635207,0.00013784599,0.00024979684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023068867,0.000011298146,0.000031665248,0.00009481487,0.00003236573,0.00001641807,0.050960843,7.309271e-8,0.00006431828,0.93046314,0.008206314,0.010116427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026215195,0.00002171459,0.00005831421,0.00008840376,0.00003076678,0.0000066115754,0.00604222,0.000033570745,0.000083135645,0.04148458,0.9520288,0.00009567692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010355664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002521586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9438225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000062640174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002145409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47613606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401456222","doi":"10.29173/pandpr29564","title":"Explorative Note on Phenomenology, Truth, and Correctness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phenomenology & Practice","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Correctness; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.07833873274901937,"score_gpt":0.3310338849085447,"score_spread":0.2526951521595253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401456222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046957906,0.012185158,0.0006984685,0.045215055,0.014820752,0.00064399716,0.00010674543,0.00083281344,0.8785391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97872233,0.0011309014,0.000499609,0.0066441977,0.0021431893,0.0001554457,0.00004191819,0.00008875127,0.010573647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977355,0.00051362894,0.00036485522,0.000714356,0.0001682987,0.00050338684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952207,0.0039218534,0.00017447789,0.0003838687,0.000194886,0.00010419136],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066608284,0.00034030172,0.0004477347,0.00024030155,0.00050834933,0.00026463193,0.00022971192,0.00020061275,0.00057300593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007311171,0.00030139362,0.000073146024,0.000096692886,0.0016619251,0.000937678,0.00012351904,0.0011009981,0.001158629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017839612,0.00016514031,0.000005506366,0.00007204039,0.0002827641,0.00008544608,0.09866185,0.0000045246697,0.000073780335,0.88641804,0.0017240937,0.012328428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037545804,0.0009571312,0.000012591413,0.00004478804,0.00025749966,0.000052030067,0.036716487,0.000097894255,0.0000621116,0.14613125,0.8149326,0.0003601454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000107181135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001130855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9317644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009186919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001379567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401473350","doi":"10.1007/s11406-024-00769-7","title":"A New Argument for Ethical Evidentialism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Doctrine; Philosophy; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of mind; Internalism and externalism; Deontological ethics; Metaphysics; Theology","score_opus":0.13857238471559946,"score_gpt":0.3445676835304498,"score_spread":0.20599529881485035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401473350","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047985124,0.016039783,0.008090332,0.7605523,0.03119078,0.0017733854,0.00027760465,0.0013464225,0.17593089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94289094,0.00009232909,0.0010608732,0.0087458,0.023388973,0.00009515351,0.000050162085,0.00006965328,0.02360614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990735,0.000036007546,0.00022038222,0.0002740993,0.00017926579,0.00021674379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993061,0.00030008893,0.000031943808,0.00018742667,0.00007645912,0.000097976816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034762127,0.0001404013,0.00018924088,0.0000713864,0.00016819772,0.00026711327,0.00014966963,0.00014559481,0.0007285829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007946585,0.00011970677,0.00021437739,0.000024203528,0.0001460051,0.000121329635,0.000036290745,0.0004561752,0.00041021162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011437932,0.00001523221,9.275101e-7,0.00018051508,0.00007760744,0.0000060206426,0.008045855,7.0108825e-7,0.00006216718,0.91874474,0.071728475,0.0011263464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104461295,0.0000507527,0.0000018813356,0.00005780739,0.00006155653,0.000001651638,0.000044036467,0.00006873428,0.000056425877,0.4796309,0.5198325,0.000089304274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013340196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011449515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9380924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026470889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011890612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7977472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401479091","doi":"10.1007/s11098-024-02173-z","title":"Updating on the evidence of others","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of language; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.39232133899535065,"score_gpt":0.3875033772673601,"score_spread":0.0048179617279905385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401479091","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12292682,0.059998292,0.000013998566,0.55944765,0.0031765983,0.00039340742,0.000028495097,0.00025264767,0.25376213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99559754,0.00063386204,0.000010672405,0.001709266,0.0013988941,0.000018906147,3.2360742e-7,0.000011272633,0.0006192601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922395,0.00009466161,0.00019997409,0.00016883665,0.00018744472,0.0001251226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737835,0.002300414,0.00004474016,0.0001590412,0.000100030935,0.00001744095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052218064,0.00010443093,0.00019645163,0.00002733605,0.00026577394,0.000042638625,0.00014074953,0.000027403568,0.00013289883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005716665,0.000055338325,0.00010709353,0.000037042006,0.0011218505,0.00007238371,0.00006178148,0.00027625848,0.00010175303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008684414,0.000016645881,0.000011256014,0.00018804442,0.00017090488,0.0000029006626,0.021596607,0.0000017377214,0.000041187785,0.9758121,0.0015884272,0.0005615281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033661967,0.00015914899,0.000015515676,0.0007979707,0.00006142539,5.505516e-7,0.0053445054,0.00003281756,0.00016915928,0.9609932,0.03229568,0.00009639259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023435516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004047017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8726707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015669702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013970703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4133505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402215799","doi":"10.7202/1111531ar","title":"Leaping and Lurching into the 21st Century: A Review of Réal Fillion’s The Elective Mind Fillion, R. (2021). The elective mind: Philosophy and the undergraduate degree","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Degree (music); Psychology; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.0774328851998357,"score_gpt":0.3512932104552837,"score_spread":0.273860325255448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402215799","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000040769304,0.8208545,9.3975126e-7,0.16872165,0.00044549676,0.00046228187,0.00010103007,6.9423555e-7,0.009372668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011688214,0.98166513,0.0000128402135,0.002106438,0.0031617722,0.000037234957,0.000040452065,0.000020677473,0.0012672557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796665,0.0007117279,0.00070861453,0.00020167185,0.00020387348,0.00020746606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966343,0.0017504737,0.00081692205,0.00019470282,0.00041862202,0.00018498997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012780295,0.00028168567,0.0005970675,0.00022100238,0.0011286059,0.00035167276,0.00029139913,0.00009103931,0.000104350635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078087964,0.00012401641,0.00026438857,0.00019273323,0.0017535046,0.00012604352,0.000024866273,0.00092209247,0.00000489182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008888926,0.000011399104,0.000002887086,0.0028038605,0.00036967598,0.0000013831992,0.026226817,7.4174515e-8,3.5463874e-8,0.87203854,0.00498309,0.09355334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009957891,0.00008697548,0.000022285649,0.007160876,0.0009001338,0.0002956823,0.0035965634,0.0000012413968,2.2404464e-7,0.08502122,0.9026849,0.00013030153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002473372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03285971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89770186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012645788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007932087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402216249","doi":"10.7202/1110367ar","title":"János Tőzsér, \"The Failure of Philosophical Knowledge: Why Philosophers are not Entitled to their Beliefs\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.12684465057941238,"score_gpt":0.32397682958813456,"score_spread":0.19713217900872218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402216249","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014880046,0.35785618,0.000026174002,0.48215744,0.0030469948,0.0023191872,0.00026856,0.00024809677,0.15258938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586301,0.015905032,0.00005934863,0.019306935,0.0048486097,0.00029870198,0.000034594905,0.0000993991,0.0008173108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972985,0.0004068442,0.0009274092,0.0005893453,0.0003517662,0.0004261373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801874,0.00057033944,0.00019965811,0.00078006287,0.0002811477,0.00015003921],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011737801,0.00043135937,0.0009953998,0.00019923964,0.000190429,0.00010143999,0.0007259979,0.00014520905,0.0012106581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027147587,0.00028546975,0.00055819476,0.00035896007,0.0007065466,0.00020524506,0.00017737725,0.0008757324,0.0009127931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015317066,0.00021487671,0.000019781395,0.00966106,0.00015687088,0.000021301412,0.00800708,0.0000017916227,0.000044499808,0.9574722,0.021868486,0.0025167295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017241602,0.00010937261,0.000014202723,0.010430305,0.00015729755,0.0000070973747,0.00017468624,0.000011265966,0.00006616797,0.31523898,0.6732958,0.00032239774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003063169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032318398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95714206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006947895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000112867405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402474251","doi":"10.1007/s10670-024-00860-1","title":"Explaining Deontic Status by Good Reasoning","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Deontic logic; Ontology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.034566074911670026,"score_gpt":0.2666271057852702,"score_spread":0.2320610308736002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402474251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098668724,0.027387422,0.0009399016,0.0015979196,0.0071949847,0.00024998534,0.00021386966,0.000950105,0.8627971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94193834,0.00027642306,0.00028860942,0.0005027436,0.0012122735,0.000024638115,0.000067010726,0.000052615218,0.055637356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879706,0.000077443525,0.0002197476,0.00030027135,0.00017712031,0.00042834796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993482,0.00024451627,0.000043839274,0.00020832565,0.00005460119,0.00010046707],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033843718,0.00016900265,0.00020457407,0.00007035404,0.00034558386,0.0003794596,0.0001243589,0.00007342217,0.00096466165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070464375,0.00015187837,0.00011523682,0.000046262176,0.0002489679,0.00027107124,0.00004036648,0.00037938976,0.00047569512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007536994,0.00003634082,0.0002513902,0.00018888194,0.00013153219,0.000040959327,0.07464133,0.0000015828223,0.00021052496,0.8327956,0.081951775,0.009742501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012125186,0.00006643797,0.00003075299,0.0001376313,0.000057571942,0.0000046308637,0.0063216086,0.00026354042,0.00016285009,0.0060506808,0.9865688,0.00021421016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004497129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004768549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9046171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004279815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007117718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402735461","doi":"10.1111/phis.12270","title":"The relational foundations of epistemic normativity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Issues","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13942213779372395,"score_gpt":0.34003044071721017,"score_spread":0.20060830292348622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402735461","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03183193,0.011593886,0.0004488986,0.5643533,0.0036811193,0.00034331813,0.00019363867,0.00031653975,0.38723737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99254405,0.0001663684,0.00006630955,0.00014338164,0.0016821952,0.00001405797,0.000028192444,0.000011126953,0.0053443057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916124,0.00010726732,0.000275233,0.00013030965,0.00020514977,0.000120806515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860376,0.0009964348,0.000054018656,0.00017881875,0.00013511544,0.000031839176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000430444,0.00008937691,0.00014095278,0.000038241426,0.00041319974,0.00011291876,0.00013152717,0.000053041324,0.0003018729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015490582,0.000058145462,0.00011359303,0.0000417495,0.0010613683,0.00020304778,0.00003660362,0.00029685049,0.00024830404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004638596,0.000025721063,0.000026956162,0.00006847326,0.00004972569,0.0000012345142,0.007149128,0.0000025892853,0.000031199266,0.99103385,0.0008935892,0.0007128942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028909188,0.000022197411,0.00006460558,0.00003713048,0.00002132236,0.0000012660015,0.00016728466,0.00022700655,0.000032896638,0.69074565,0.30860028,0.000051440926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007078338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014691136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96071213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015996444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041603886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39106557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402942414","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i3.8818","title":"On the Ethics of Real-Life Examples of Argument","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.17396522314448498,"score_gpt":0.3165458129415229,"score_spread":0.14258058979703792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402942414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28216714,0.0004974271,0.000088957124,0.0036584032,0.0011769041,0.00019499997,0.00008159491,0.00006920446,0.7120654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954035,0.00021866262,0.000024635927,0.0016282295,0.00017772282,0.000007674814,0.000008455347,0.0000062289405,0.002524888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920356,0.00006229981,0.00031156326,0.00007365355,0.00021750016,0.00013144362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985057,0.0010721126,0.000099596844,0.00018828026,0.00010921479,0.000025074052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008538424,0.00008962697,0.00016284203,0.000049590075,0.00011490799,0.000037963004,0.00015975349,0.00008452768,0.0005024563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001993199,0.000050069884,0.00010616551,0.000028015036,0.0005984871,0.00009987751,0.000042211755,0.00042000573,0.00006727744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000117759055,0.000020252808,0.000014553439,0.00022996464,0.000042425258,0.0000010040242,0.041571297,0.000025365827,0.00002988483,0.95658094,0.0011276178,0.00034493828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023015896,0.0009612267,0.00072032167,0.0003708385,0.00009856891,0.000002557355,0.019264018,0.00030791346,0.0019646944,0.39388138,0.58191884,0.00027950003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034447524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021116505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7132364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000073594924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000108159875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55015445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402942428","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i3.8693","title":"Particularism About Arguments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; European Regional Development Fund; University of Windsor","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06390580805537117,"score_gpt":0.2839270534649076,"score_spread":0.22002124540953644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402942428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08122818,0.0018027986,0.000278516,0.0009227366,0.004114108,0.00016579304,0.000028490294,0.0003732351,0.91108614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96577674,0.000055144345,0.00008694993,0.0023276068,0.0008369283,0.000020544056,0.000026073893,0.000011077164,0.030858919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992429,0.000018574117,0.00022196201,0.00011566746,0.00014202733,0.00025887653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996715,0.000052335497,0.000032175718,0.00014001592,0.00005008806,0.00005385855],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022720189,0.000112950256,0.00012745486,0.00005246935,0.00017887283,0.00023060836,0.00010449509,0.00006934054,0.0010842377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020983214,0.00008295071,0.00010690151,0.000025402409,0.00025527438,0.00040611508,0.000043244814,0.00026160615,0.002277221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003453855,0.000015989563,0.000054135347,0.00007937349,0.000043301912,0.000023784276,0.014813991,0.000007639438,0.000010905641,0.97677857,0.0038913703,0.0042774947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008803187,0.00007104233,0.00022508278,0.000034191617,0.000029499022,0.000005914192,0.00079866505,0.00027392947,0.00008911847,0.026998432,0.9712519,0.0001342089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060313196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006704213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9673605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012711712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036530295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402943298","doi":"10.1093/analys/anae066","title":"Prescriptive and Evaluative Norms of Assertion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.05896211011207234,"score_gpt":0.3113359419764128,"score_spread":0.2523738318643404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402943298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8892961,0.004143721,0.0010966777,0.00068134244,0.0004177742,0.00012681636,0.00006240692,0.00006380968,0.10411132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99217814,0.00008011231,0.000039562805,0.000056207384,0.00011584202,0.0000057431967,0.000018935345,0.00000469285,0.007500743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994661,0.00006397836,0.00014123804,0.00014188075,0.00011729056,0.00006948124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958396,0.000111389076,0.000042236232,0.00009727768,0.00014569437,0.000019447003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030050473,0.000061803075,0.00018962368,0.00016675417,0.00006705514,0.000054539763,0.000038780745,0.000029020186,0.0003457049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003255784,0.000045855493,0.00014304054,0.00013084192,0.00022656487,0.00014400858,0.00001517751,0.00008386597,0.000016851329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001496757,0.00005692518,0.0021960526,0.00015961406,0.00560633,0.0000039392316,0.16402611,0.000045613015,0.00061705604,0.82010275,0.0009498208,0.006220809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093619607,0.0011739464,0.055150166,0.0003625826,0.053155366,0.000003172119,0.11282198,0.084475935,0.0089287795,0.4738159,0.20774356,0.0014324236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072217325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023941146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34628686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009477896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018656616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37852263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403262715","doi":"10.1111/phib.12361","title":"What Second‐Best Epistemology Could Be","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytic Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11779552250451471,"score_gpt":0.31308587345759925,"score_spread":0.19529035095308456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403262715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024985809,0.013000389,0.00005396029,0.058559015,0.014068028,0.00031537027,0.00013789698,0.0004310118,0.88844854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9139398,0.00039486316,0.000019660412,0.006667291,0.0038911032,0.000019630479,0.00005953593,0.000049571394,0.074958555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840564,0.00009979455,0.00039612263,0.0004910913,0.00022986748,0.00037750645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988734,0.00033433788,0.00007673687,0.0004537238,0.00014039763,0.00012142004],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037333276,0.00026894506,0.00043236738,0.00021871307,0.00026832614,0.00053705095,0.00028206682,0.00016139321,0.003494208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035319437,0.00023432408,0.00031069928,0.00009504112,0.00093259226,0.0007173309,0.00006700255,0.0005432503,0.0018087851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007920986,0.00006941567,0.000011591183,0.0003131922,0.00027243994,0.000135258,0.00910916,0.000001655312,0.000032806212,0.97519636,0.014002249,0.00084792654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011500612,0.0001225951,0.0000036095175,0.00013428096,0.00015687509,0.00002061926,0.0011713943,0.00019928296,0.000041800744,0.45190912,0.5459043,0.00022113377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009138163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000602314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.888954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005258626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107506945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403886270","doi":"10.1007/s11245-024-10116-w","title":"Should we Trust Our Feeds? Social Media, Misinformation, and the Epistemology of Testimony","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Topoi","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Collège Montmorency","funders":"","keywords":"Misinformation; Social media; Social epistemology; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09409951057208775,"score_gpt":0.29622390479604516,"score_spread":0.2021243942239574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403886270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16043957,0.013855023,0.0003116696,0.239551,0.009399946,0.00079680106,0.00026135205,0.00042150324,0.57496315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894555,0.00009004665,0.00003691143,0.00070684525,0.0012173731,0.000010407562,0.000012706501,0.000011809108,0.008458387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926656,0.000085028776,0.0002747202,0.00010552921,0.00012830265,0.00013983603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922985,0.00046483986,0.000075000135,0.00011315558,0.00009080712,0.000026377586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052521646,0.00010315608,0.0002412882,0.0000562648,0.00024074486,0.000090024914,0.00011777267,0.00008721828,0.00013460014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012096214,0.00006544762,0.00008861684,0.000032866275,0.0008790447,0.00013839614,0.000037716818,0.00023543986,0.000053804633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016766759,0.000009460274,0.000017093067,0.00016892015,0.000042724263,0.0000020951188,0.11283117,4.300239e-7,0.0000069035245,0.8685014,0.01431766,0.0040853266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009525132,0.00006640653,0.0003470579,0.00007212247,0.0002032995,0.000022611808,0.04080782,0.0004154142,0.0001458602,0.38054305,0.57618654,0.00023730341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013789428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000369164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.829016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010323091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050937346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32388768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403916222","doi":"10.3998/ergo.6788","title":"Autonomy as Practical Understanding","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychology; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.4746616869622343,"score_gpt":0.47891760958848395,"score_spread":0.004255922626249631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403916222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012277702,0.0011689193,0.001865881,0.031898953,0.005479059,0.00027647696,0.000018164837,0.000065117885,0.9469497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990152,0.00007931616,0.00042444316,0.0015861209,0.0050920816,0.0000035341748,0.000004708682,0.00003850756,0.0026193033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853426,0.0001866426,0.0005275487,0.00021615272,0.0003208018,0.00021462001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987955,0.0003069182,0.0002988168,0.00020643404,0.00020541063,0.00018690726],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010639919,0.00017298185,0.0003580223,0.00022959444,0.00035153978,0.0046110814,0.001180469,0.000074552365,0.0022038955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010334907,0.00013522498,0.00015376061,0.00007644172,0.00037229163,0.007326392,0.00031290122,0.0007687545,0.000119708064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007786109,0.00012511348,0.000022892593,0.00007260532,0.00019275545,0.00029671728,0.008555325,0.000005774755,0.000022052176,0.98517925,0.0049866475,0.00046300926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022657678,0.00035897744,0.000008817528,0.00018639844,0.00009461877,0.000121915735,0.0013905872,0.00004046933,0.000050958755,0.78972465,0.20764174,0.00015431382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000072963136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000615871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9778743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017329451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000782291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403952721","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.30","title":"Opportunity Costs and Resource Allocation Problems: Epistemology for Finite Minds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Resource allocation; Resource (disambiguation); Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.12312714624079654,"score_gpt":0.2737110599725582,"score_spread":0.15058391373176164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403952721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3759087,0.0060390765,0.00065224065,0.26077804,0.009299259,0.00240008,0.0015033461,0.00016058,0.34325865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932592,0.000036806665,0.000073076764,0.001877049,0.0016478099,0.0000108680115,0.000054798988,0.000025303856,0.0030150802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990381,0.00010221873,0.0003686866,0.00012721038,0.00009248796,0.00027130957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983861,0.0003384345,0.00027191322,0.00013193185,0.0003732078,0.0004984535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008202727,0.00011860632,0.0002569488,0.00037091662,0.00038521225,0.000073561634,0.0001673466,0.000095254814,0.00006880911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032135766,0.00011213307,0.000099640936,0.0000615474,0.0005412041,0.00014382861,0.000010295888,0.00024969626,0.000013372865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034650096,0.000021683807,0.0005167641,0.00028154513,0.00014731224,0.000095927135,0.022633767,0.00004490371,0.00003541577,0.93895835,0.030168626,0.007061039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049582135,0.00037249067,0.00021728987,0.0001157019,0.00006498921,0.000043322194,0.001224921,0.000071220034,0.000015631786,0.27769744,0.71952176,0.00015941702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010567871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02301791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6893531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068753245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059832836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99480945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404297810","doi":"10.1162/opmi_a_00168","title":"When New Experience Leads to New Knowledge: A Computational Framework for Formalizing Epistemically Transformative Experiences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Mind","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Philosophy; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.16232369331795912,"score_gpt":0.39285729298984573,"score_spread":0.2305335996718866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404297810","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19916745,0.0024348653,0.6375721,0.008266101,0.0043664216,0.0023740835,0.00012368298,0.000047209727,0.14564806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6863046,0.000010778095,0.24355489,0.0010869069,0.0022836872,0.0003599574,0.00005988383,0.00004769738,0.066291556],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987675,0.00004137043,0.00037566377,0.00035178082,0.00016010611,0.00030356643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989671,0.00052327354,0.00005329691,0.00013950156,0.000114387796,0.00020245476],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027964846,0.00018505006,0.00027341396,0.00007313924,0.0003478349,0.0010037831,0.0005135266,0.00008878983,0.0029007087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006705756,0.00015806581,0.000120234865,0.00006533956,0.0002488558,0.00089662086,0.000081425846,0.00021007136,0.0003924669],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032661148,0.000020103556,0.0000018613662,0.00003535619,0.00002316067,0.000001365751,0.721059,0.000019829162,0.000020882304,0.21630867,0.0064106523,0.056066446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002041963,0.00018759203,0.0000015484973,0.00035964133,0.00002475785,0.0000041993685,0.12293218,0.00044971754,0.0007642057,0.096709445,0.7781086,0.00025392396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014532809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054431707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77169794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041560248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004741894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99801075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404530073","doi":"","title":"Believe it or not, it’s all about Beliefs !","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Information technology; Psychology; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06751289495492263,"score_gpt":0.28217365666557737,"score_spread":0.21466076171065473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404530073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010156483,0.0040773563,0.0024040688,0.15054162,0.004223139,0.0009641007,0.00077645696,0.0007644909,0.8260923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2931352,0.003595021,0.0056314133,0.0061750007,0.0007484899,0.00022735506,0.001346635,0.00019516537,0.6889457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99385,0.0031531877,0.00084030145,0.0010495182,0.00056020747,0.0005468175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99270314,0.0019465783,0.0005168552,0.002316912,0.002297938,0.00021856274],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054348046,0.0005391846,0.0006530803,0.00023147535,0.0005966809,0.0011980847,0.0015312821,0.00047275983,0.0016503575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001089331,0.00048605227,0.000458684,0.000107960994,0.0010205572,0.00013184898,0.0022449025,0.0019440472,0.00079613953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022274007,0.00034232633,0.000016296206,0.00077767763,0.00029143572,0.000018670165,0.1865332,0.000008269595,0.00012869731,0.7454062,0.058822256,0.0076326802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003020092,0.0000010554209,0.000074727504,0.0031112416,0.00020486083,0.0000076989345,0.0015559117,0.0007130997,0.002589103,0.03778025,0.95300543,0.0006546209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034091293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041710846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89418316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013320234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005941787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404530841","doi":"10.1017/s0012217323000446","title":"Précis of <i>The Limitations of the Open Mind</i> and Replies to Nathan Ballantyne and Miriam Schleifer McCormick","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.14092687640607413,"score_gpt":0.2865326816158594,"score_spread":0.14560580520978525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404530841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93528426,0.0018947936,0.000006174149,0.0071196486,0.0016483879,0.0005884532,0.00036712302,0.000010993029,0.053080183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993829,0.00012953016,0.000079209894,0.00049460394,0.0001418753,0.000014938041,0.0000066391713,0.000009648599,0.005294535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941546,0.00007093108,0.00018242603,0.00015294935,0.000088209825,0.00009001351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992418,0.00036033193,0.000056536894,0.00023601922,0.00007964715,0.00002566064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027058274,0.00007715502,0.00016052625,0.00003202223,0.00015939146,0.00009257713,0.00022182774,0.000041017378,0.00001820352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019640976,0.000044890076,0.00005313511,0.00004823177,0.0005340947,0.00008627138,0.0002238783,0.00011480855,0.0000050827657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023056695,0.000058979407,0.0013277261,0.0001819586,0.000112089096,0.000001173001,0.12776752,0.0000024452752,0.0019147288,0.8496003,0.012494321,0.006515689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023479026,0.00011377763,0.005555242,0.00027329798,0.00013065818,0.000005384125,0.004037761,0.000017912946,0.0038715755,0.035606954,0.9500013,0.00015137435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054162584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0087702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.937507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000049008363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058177597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4893978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404611290","doi":"10.1007/s11229-024-04793-8","title":"Against cross-world anchoring","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Anchoring; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.07519814419614304,"score_gpt":0.31735295221713533,"score_spread":0.2421548080209923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404611290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12738971,0.0033905518,0.000046857273,0.0009895918,0.0075662676,0.0000953923,0.000030904986,0.00034588127,0.86014485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89142966,0.00006785487,0.00004680785,0.00033247177,0.003882056,0.000009225818,0.0000035170378,0.000027509725,0.10420091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992495,0.000044746128,0.0001702359,0.00018661814,0.00012126786,0.00022762844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940133,0.00026295095,0.000026794185,0.00018942206,0.00006368341,0.000055841545],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000394645,0.000112908674,0.00013896041,0.00010555341,0.00026992732,0.0005820581,0.00014295288,0.000037157537,0.00075124507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008354344,0.000090681766,0.00012590343,0.000038966882,0.00038852156,0.00025650603,0.000033371212,0.0003280709,0.00081613613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005725459,0.000030395713,0.00018684064,0.00020111616,0.000085893,0.00008839575,0.02435443,0.0000063045045,0.00025376416,0.93409437,0.0107356,0.029957177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037079208,0.000013268427,0.000032844157,0.00012551143,0.000016936852,0.0000023412651,0.0008735416,0.000063493804,0.000484102,0.021577196,0.976642,0.00013165863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045719724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047027197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96590644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028420276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044610115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404749374","doi":"10.3998/ergo.6914","title":"The Ideology of Pragmatic Humeanism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University; University of Bristol","keywords":"Ideology; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.16432249596325463,"score_gpt":0.4132564516425135,"score_spread":0.24893395567925888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404749374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19525865,0.01737791,0.0004984655,0.05151781,0.017683329,0.0009467493,0.00008203054,0.00007403677,0.716561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944257,0.00029920432,0.00013328611,0.00066901935,0.002504898,0.00000491967,0.0000030875058,0.000026616099,0.0019332339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983833,0.00030313703,0.0007272865,0.00013975479,0.00026797602,0.00017856559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822557,0.00050416525,0.0005228982,0.00028516678,0.00038163445,0.00008058432],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015537628,0.0001411813,0.00039110144,0.00013518435,0.00035063594,0.0013054342,0.0022530933,0.00005954364,0.0004941775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012280817,0.000085049905,0.00015765552,0.00006520855,0.00074637355,0.0022301562,0.00034265732,0.0005041368,0.000026839576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005433313,0.00008136317,0.00003515648,0.00013224229,0.00020490678,0.000039286002,0.008227007,0.000008581868,0.00011258443,0.98506397,0.003961006,0.002079564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022420236,0.00041283912,0.00007546398,0.0001884738,0.00009574436,0.000042483767,0.00060722244,0.000029544139,0.00014646188,0.8932441,0.10483015,0.00010329111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008641145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002488849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7991671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002015824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020777303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405083585","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2024.2436950","title":"Gambles between obvious truths","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Action (physics); Counterexample; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Statistics; Physics","score_opus":0.20687401070306144,"score_gpt":0.34685276947978094,"score_spread":0.1399787587767195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405083585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53329974,0.012305566,0.0008901923,0.0037453393,0.021549938,0.00030840698,0.0001664791,0.0014164658,0.4263179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98076034,0.00005848081,0.0000495744,0.00035590905,0.0077412557,0.00001025101,0.000026211801,0.000027890457,0.010970071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991926,0.00005257376,0.00019035404,0.00021770937,0.0001324588,0.00021433034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994025,0.00026233774,0.000026261052,0.00020824758,0.000047724094,0.000052884992],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023802403,0.00012225471,0.00018342644,0.000078012694,0.00019413882,0.00020529397,0.0001484148,0.00008010155,0.0005211559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023057923,0.00010169096,0.00011700412,0.000030146539,0.00062847056,0.00015831765,0.000027008404,0.00025958725,0.0010049772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003231046,0.000023487702,0.00047944862,0.00018136375,0.00011741966,0.000042498516,0.099736854,0.0000012367609,0.000069302514,0.84126157,0.03832918,0.01975441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007438492,0.000058145895,0.0003092568,0.00007118711,0.00006465541,0.000002477032,0.003180785,0.000014586527,0.00022893143,0.04882648,0.94700146,0.00016768099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009715423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011596169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9086723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018553015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004083173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405234122","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.57.3.0333","title":"Sophisms and Contempt for Autonomy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Autonomy; Philosophy; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09365532945548626,"score_gpt":0.2821873199907969,"score_spread":0.1885319905353106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405234122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046159826,0.11647061,0.0012255857,0.044511903,0.017423654,0.0015784305,0.00040107884,0.000855135,0.77137375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886908,0.0002642025,0.0000750446,0.000491511,0.0032753274,0.00004753842,0.000011615996,0.00002007774,0.007123878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938685,0.000020614592,0.0001464362,0.00024060269,0.00005686968,0.00014861902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995592,0.00021216176,0.000027084636,0.000092212475,0.000047382004,0.00006195904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017306674,0.00012757734,0.00018301616,0.00006712498,0.00029725803,0.0001474383,0.000048804064,0.000060950213,0.00003436248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013869305,0.00010083363,0.00006954242,0.000019757146,0.00034077556,0.00016745864,0.000023991097,0.00013930254,0.000017015822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009085036,0.000015283586,0.000011664521,0.00032720718,0.000055848457,0.0000029275818,0.012358067,9.555494e-8,0.000020729609,0.9835312,0.0010270606,0.002640829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014595942,0.000087406625,0.0000111310865,0.000041118885,0.000040484323,0.0000033576816,0.00014691277,0.00008912605,0.000014310233,0.5044408,0.49487576,0.00010367365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021514052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001304228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.942531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014635384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040064213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41118765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156245","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.8380","title":"On the Virtue-theoretic Approach to Argument Appraisal","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.0414757071857795,"score_gpt":0.28457642547190787,"score_spread":0.24310071828612836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010571987,0.0011657315,0.0021106524,0.01746362,0.0054449523,0.0006004491,0.000066217566,0.00006864776,0.9625077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79668087,0.00012449821,0.0002460238,0.034293037,0.0010021285,0.0001573152,0.000031067237,0.000021467495,0.16744357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824053,0.0001851092,0.0004766793,0.00026898173,0.00027513673,0.00055358553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815625,0.0009689211,0.00012249318,0.0005138698,0.00013262282,0.00010581948],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009801321,0.0003230349,0.00033345024,0.00012522486,0.000837999,0.0003054227,0.0005296293,0.00022037067,0.0005237613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031584778,0.00021349196,0.00022637883,0.00011818266,0.0014196141,0.00017935883,0.00020107026,0.0007622094,0.0014025256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006830764,0.00024940976,0.000012671498,0.00021995947,0.000103141945,0.0000025343347,0.010044964,0.00045216308,0.0000020896184,0.9672184,0.018841416,0.0027849278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026890854,0.00041070514,0.00012982443,0.00012685287,0.00009034096,0.0000038262365,0.0055178283,0.0004872118,0.000059427908,0.20105542,0.79158634,0.00026331889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015226105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037116057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79506415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006014518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012727494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406365300","doi":"10.1007/s44204-024-00237-9","title":"Understanding, knowledge, injustice and the right to know","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Right to know; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Social psychology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.0768248542710949,"score_gpt":0.29440306964788865,"score_spread":0.21757821537679375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406365300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00066215807,0.0024146356,0.0015780138,0.06282433,0.0021059066,0.00013392147,0.0000057599045,0.000011240592,0.93026406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916538,0.000082858765,0.00011085023,0.002029764,0.0017189546,0.0000018961185,3.8515026e-7,0.000009648649,0.004391835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991295,0.00017287338,0.0003361451,0.000100954865,0.00011899583,0.0001415581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909914,0.00028061896,0.00017529221,0.0001436752,0.00021842684,0.00008285298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070216396,0.00011847435,0.00029084997,0.00018628623,0.00038156353,0.00011506771,0.00023300161,0.000045638826,0.0000847667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014578113,0.000072371426,0.00012822532,0.00007169415,0.000788115,0.00013560556,0.00005103841,0.00037910033,0.000022069553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094254,0.00004060971,0.000015395955,0.000054839707,0.000117224314,0.000007704444,0.02623634,7.16495e-7,0.0000050881617,0.9566014,0.016322501,0.0005039541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079530233,0.0001177314,0.000024951003,0.00018003894,0.00016237744,0.000011734416,0.0041881725,0.0000039542483,0.000023088443,0.7490379,0.24538177,0.00007296664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000032121384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006697436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99099165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004279145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008463937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29512212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406721302","doi":"10.1017/epi.2024.35","title":"Luck and normative achievements: Let not safety be our guide","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Normative; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04906550307172895,"score_gpt":0.3053013587497436,"score_spread":0.25623585567801466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406721302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013916813,0.00038232745,0.00066790124,0.040799685,0.00280963,0.00042466423,0.00031128805,0.00012372945,0.940564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6791341,0.0002465162,0.00036030647,0.014918661,0.00071469095,0.00003655509,0.00010135917,0.000025587216,0.30446222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987176,0.00015926966,0.00043545774,0.00025966566,0.00016359099,0.00026441476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992339,0.00012612283,0.00013277994,0.00029061883,0.00015780822,0.000058796777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058632356,0.00019034868,0.0003211764,0.00008618595,0.0005084369,0.00011427578,0.00018173999,0.00007723728,0.00012547344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009694267,0.00016774183,0.0000914951,0.000038598857,0.00031299648,0.00022791694,0.00012310206,0.0002652039,0.00007741114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005028392,0.000081019934,0.00041662043,0.00025688624,0.00020343508,0.000006313379,0.024857167,0.0000018333835,0.00009459445,0.88869786,0.082091205,0.0032427697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053438835,0.000058808193,0.0009095186,0.00007279985,0.000058250153,0.0000010811005,0.009245287,0.00002533538,0.00019293591,0.0060557644,0.982661,0.00018484099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038525395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012679233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9005698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051708594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005883809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6840313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406772888","doi":"10.1017/s0012217324000301","title":"Group Belief: The Cognitive Non-Summative Account","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Summative assessment; Group (periodic table); Cognition; Psychology; Belief system; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics education; Formative assessment; Chemistry; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.04900467390224225,"score_gpt":0.27667186482645106,"score_spread":0.2276671909242088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406772888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14880368,0.0054867384,0.0014497688,0.0071679447,0.014742597,0.0011823165,0.0011907221,0.00052799034,0.81944823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894821,0.000106023595,0.000009474139,0.0020429003,0.0026000473,0.000072573515,0.00015417868,0.000025835194,0.005506888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991234,0.00009705041,0.00017427596,0.00022688549,0.00015187472,0.00022650995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888754,0.0007638828,0.000042741216,0.00015203527,0.00011805442,0.000035751575],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004037,0.00015084348,0.00017509998,0.000049012495,0.00038552174,0.000277031,0.00016330993,0.000067712834,0.00032952984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006630991,0.00009460792,0.00013374047,0.000043486412,0.00074568373,0.00019898449,0.00005332856,0.00038999468,0.0011399336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009233758,0.000038872106,0.000023431512,0.00006492131,0.00013641143,0.000018232495,0.12610269,3.068743e-7,0.00003260422,0.8584673,0.010928398,0.0041775904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030344364,0.0001615691,0.00063814124,0.00025386605,0.00020344034,0.00000464324,0.02204815,0.00011799726,0.0002315796,0.14365445,0.8320313,0.00035144092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005177042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002715606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8406784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000216735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005006719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406772918","doi":"10.1017/s001221732400026x","title":"Conceptual Dynamite: An Argument for Thoughtful Language in Conceptual Engineering","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamite; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; History; Chemistry","score_opus":0.04923661759232381,"score_gpt":0.2841665873978861,"score_spread":0.23492996980556227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406772918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672094,0.004737076,0.002144634,0.00065010885,0.0071797064,0.00082624325,0.0009131396,0.00051458454,0.015825106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948183,0.000016743978,0.00021085625,0.00031314933,0.0018026088,0.000090808346,0.00035632908,0.000033637265,0.0023576003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991255,0.000045965193,0.0002090083,0.00025068835,0.00009485521,0.00027399042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994417,0.000289329,0.000024200122,0.00015150929,0.00003625555,0.000056998968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027885655,0.00014695912,0.0002115387,0.000082877115,0.00006849171,0.00010903687,0.00012317515,0.00008302685,0.00015186564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057999958,0.00013389949,0.00009113271,0.000032784992,0.00033542525,0.00019727758,0.000022083152,0.00022761893,0.000050098064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007291541,0.000036599577,0.000018763641,0.00005245741,0.00002620018,0.000021165864,0.17191881,0.00006397014,0.00037926904,0.82581043,0.0006395411,0.0010255204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001170127,0.00049469486,0.00019079022,0.00020057448,0.0000854557,0.0000049952005,0.08579079,0.007577531,0.0009982807,0.009247906,0.89349514,0.00074370595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022812973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021082454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8928556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000450381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004642545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5460263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406913208","doi":"10.4324/9781003183853-57","title":"Knowledge as Wisdom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.09822102220543513,"score_gpt":0.291272884015731,"score_spread":0.19305186181029585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406913208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003633376,0.0065121516,0.0000031350908,0.0006545909,0.005211749,0.00014963093,0.000061280574,0.0002686104,0.98713523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007597592,0.00033131396,0.000013334115,0.00075170095,0.0048061037,0.0000072041844,0.00005725309,0.0000995675,0.9931738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900556,0.000009576561,0.0002799421,0.00036639892,0.00014254576,0.00019596824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922234,0.00012748053,0.00007286844,0.00033730606,0.00016693106,0.00007307979],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015139033,0.0003311249,0.00041006788,0.00012572957,0.00016028693,0.00016239226,0.0001934704,0.00031676033,0.024604488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000833197,0.0002625046,0.0003355877,0.0000038052112,0.000810187,0.000060178576,0.0001028383,0.0007593805,0.04030189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024347419,0.000010446302,3.8785497e-8,0.00019054479,0.0001598967,0.000020966007,0.009974935,2.0254266e-8,5.9511916e-7,0.88457924,0.10388159,0.0011793013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033942004,0.000037091795,2.311323e-8,0.00009991411,0.00010136769,0.0000026292273,0.00023882951,9.70503e-7,0.000003067126,0.45928544,0.5400134,0.00018333118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000108101376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027782817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4361318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033625718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012013332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408192811","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2025.2470869","title":"Faith and the practical self","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Medicine; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0865048685046294,"score_gpt":0.33896903432683045,"score_spread":0.25246416582220105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408192811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07691112,0.0015745447,0.00059692224,0.049355704,0.0047538676,0.00032650403,0.000005778585,0.00018058409,0.866295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978567,0.00009351886,0.00019284071,0.0051474953,0.0010207415,0.000016327978,0.0000017137706,0.000006219659,0.014954136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952334,0.000109343775,0.00010132921,0.0001039258,0.00006143549,0.000100633784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923927,0.0005171063,0.000030783987,0.00014462616,0.00005135977,0.000016881288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036139286,0.00006021705,0.00011364641,0.00002180123,0.00029086796,0.00009284447,0.000061249586,0.000039483777,0.00006936379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010414704,0.000035656565,0.000036250378,0.000014933664,0.0013687849,0.00008324392,0.0000476074,0.00020176714,0.000035671525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019030344,0.000021989756,0.000049282273,0.000021574988,0.000042484873,0.0000019979107,0.052162398,5.9011892e-8,0.0000014215889,0.93275774,0.014405718,0.0005162833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049353123,0.00001744333,0.00018364676,0.000013429281,0.000063030224,0.0000027543367,0.010804848,0.000028129285,0.000019331907,0.11771207,0.87060446,0.000057321915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006052453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015380548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9016559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000058143255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037195336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5043345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408377166","doi":"10.1111/mila.12549","title":"Learning from presupposition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind & Language","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Presupposition; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.024644692752510307,"score_gpt":0.2675436541497517,"score_spread":0.24289896139724138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408377166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6549326,0.00080007134,0.000116825286,0.00044267235,0.00055420917,0.00006543585,0.0000245334,0.000045731475,0.34301788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9109519,0.0000042286283,0.000083768726,0.0004753266,0.00049081276,0.0000063214184,0.0001082244,0.000006559446,0.08787287],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950635,0.00006714784,0.00010550679,0.00013754657,0.0000634443,0.0001199832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970007,0.00008974514,0.000035670986,0.0001241694,0.000031521533,0.000018838382],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000095050316,0.00007352139,0.00010877276,0.000042107466,0.00018356681,0.00007292967,0.000079151156,0.000049144997,0.0019218188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003564692,0.00006622251,0.000055128887,0.000016660297,0.00011060446,0.00007014846,0.000025966023,0.00020667259,0.00020562907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052779844,0.00015600641,0.0009833511,0.000092624374,0.00021930395,0.000061511826,0.6737852,0.000019428157,0.010082963,0.22861066,0.0117348675,0.074201286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006172785,0.00009884169,0.0010970703,0.0001265179,0.00014973417,7.556326e-7,0.07262738,0.00016869161,0.010143232,0.009368302,0.9053225,0.00027973193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084894616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011798539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8935876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011726782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017913515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99899054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408722686","doi":"10.3819/ccbr.2025.200002","title":"Are You Studying Occasion Setting? A Review for Inquiring Minds","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative cognition; Psychology; Animal behavior; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Neuroscience; Cognition; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.5828025599235268,"score_gpt":0.4896650970985617,"score_spread":0.0931374628249651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408722686","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000030902188,0.97846663,0.00015835992,0.000071260845,0.0017758961,0.012931698,0.0008089382,0.00011589486,0.005668257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000044288854,0.9779787,0.00022473489,0.0010919046,0.0010287793,0.012103933,0.0019190857,0.00006998564,0.0055784485],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99402857,0.0015766878,0.0025063115,0.0010496577,0.00030799382,0.0005308037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936695,0.00095439533,0.0034829227,0.0007142723,0.0010381058,0.00014077577],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020315105,0.0010827095,0.006270151,0.00032471537,0.0009175901,0.00022960518,0.0005552597,0.00028900706,0.0004693411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005774527,0.0008585997,0.0021953734,0.00024792008,0.00052964006,0.00027393035,0.00018959552,0.0010280185,0.00044020262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046096325,0.00028583524,0.0000023487053,0.232384,0.00013535631,0.0000084263975,0.001715788,7.706619e-9,2.5532367e-7,0.0019469415,0.04665434,0.7168621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020660087,0.000066538516,0.0000011589325,0.26747704,0.008614471,0.000007873411,0.0005614384,2.333564e-7,7.773581e-7,0.000088470864,0.7223745,0.00060090516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000034298707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007914258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7162612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014741533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002433843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408733675","doi":"10.1007/s12630-025-02929-z","title":"When our intuition lets us down—something believed to be beneficial may actually be harmful","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; St. Boniface Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Philosophy; Psychology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.03151400182921381,"score_gpt":0.2582160054669556,"score_spread":0.2267020036377418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408733675","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07348032,0.002549392,0.0000481982,0.09590467,0.8165515,0.0009718716,0.0010980703,0.000077932986,0.009318039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06359012,0.00038139828,0.00062179373,0.0043777255,0.903001,0.000023871062,0.00041946163,0.0003595023,0.027225092],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918741,0.00075255515,0.0025175218,0.0007707076,0.0019708246,0.0021142927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870968,0.0007683907,0.0023828736,0.0006815956,0.0050412905,0.00402909],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004614694,0.0012531127,0.002332393,0.0030782335,0.002383622,0.002274227,0.0024436896,0.0015036791,0.00069536065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026425375,0.0012230133,0.0011552316,0.00031993326,0.0005227018,0.0009969487,0.000057467343,0.0068022446,0.000050258455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017807708,0.000050169103,0.000017114256,0.0002227783,0.00048625912,0.12477727,0.034036327,0.000087647284,0.000004054658,0.00481031,0.83362234,0.0017076707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008837837,0.0012541167,0.000019556399,0.0011113901,0.00076311757,0.08265948,0.007160566,0.000002110858,0.000013798829,0.0030502474,0.9019684,0.0011134112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070099235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50277305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43267378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027900361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025679545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408923871","doi":"10.1017/epi.2024.64","title":"Safety, Lotteries, and Failures of the Imagination","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Imagination; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.018141313910389006,"score_gpt":0.24552333374629173,"score_spread":0.22738201983590273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408923871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082310185,0.0034527713,0.00039699854,0.0733816,0.003626695,0.000510997,0.00009733209,0.00008742198,0.836136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588745,0.000035984624,0.000037631693,0.0007273819,0.00011780979,0.000004970663,0.00000423672,0.000004859884,0.040192615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949926,0.00007445401,0.00017187491,0.000097771794,0.00007598185,0.0000806723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954766,0.00009452458,0.00007593605,0.0001741874,0.000097181175,0.000010508365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020341719,0.00006532566,0.00012468784,0.00003223962,0.00019790794,0.000037295496,0.00010870295,0.000027848344,0.00007716414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050549843,0.00004481759,0.000044657736,0.000027001388,0.00075570954,0.00008022015,0.000060379367,0.000093276176,0.000004221753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000618461,0.000013688814,0.0009149635,0.00012209194,0.000022570424,2.0409652e-7,0.0054730102,3.39901e-7,0.00015459023,0.98765635,0.004105601,0.001530381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020757882,0.000017254573,0.0060592154,0.00007221093,0.000032930377,6.641389e-7,0.0013993448,0.0000130498665,0.00059079897,0.08961418,0.9019256,0.000067124536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033621432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011820025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8980422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001139279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032803073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27844432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409146083","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzae069","title":"<i>The Meaning of</i> If, by Justin Khoo","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.042840520023571936,"score_gpt":0.26548384705780703,"score_spread":0.2226433270342351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409146083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11323017,0.012147285,0.00012483732,0.003359984,0.004959355,0.00015546857,0.000113052396,0.000069359776,0.8658405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8992058,0.000071979346,0.00005440832,0.00019915092,0.0008214237,0.0000053836116,0.000009976388,0.000016198133,0.09961566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948114,0.00003452086,0.00014557222,0.00010850316,0.00009756948,0.00013267185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999524,0.00026181806,0.000031307223,0.000119595934,0.00004193765,0.000021370462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029002596,0.000067058696,0.000095520154,0.000018398952,0.00020665818,0.00010644348,0.00010226183,0.00003340015,0.00023469904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030132533,0.0000453363,0.00006550635,0.000019703895,0.00033128535,0.000053052634,0.000021662734,0.00016524762,0.0001576304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005019876,0.000019474443,0.000015179998,0.00010454641,0.00006319563,0.0000060249754,0.05784665,0.0000011198471,0.0012763041,0.7546684,0.16404237,0.021951674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040982493,0.00002497112,0.0000020480288,0.000036391022,0.000035081703,0.0000011540418,0.0033597827,0.000040879604,0.002202719,0.008339018,0.9858564,0.000060571485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006805473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021825937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.821814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000068944346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027102604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.256979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409163593","doi":"10.1080/00048402.2025.2481918","title":"Knowledge and the Onslaught of Desire","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0565058951522663,"score_gpt":0.29256044676754855,"score_spread":0.23605455161528227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409163593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09277176,0.008066402,0.00008333732,0.034344163,0.0025703344,0.00025622422,0.00002036023,0.000015292806,0.86187214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99444854,0.0001181622,0.00009875323,0.00022415069,0.0007742465,0.0000010704679,4.7369116e-7,0.000006689338,0.0043278867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911845,0.0001556538,0.0004352966,0.00007524113,0.00010120001,0.00011417983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989748,0.0002736588,0.00030433387,0.00013898281,0.0002645715,0.000043623822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057083904,0.0001059605,0.0003393873,0.00012608679,0.00015563324,0.000035909114,0.0002144829,0.000052759093,0.0000767099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007126942,0.00006476583,0.00018571039,0.00004921077,0.0015153394,0.00012963304,0.000028918941,0.0003569219,0.000005694342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007800381,0.000061361745,0.00017195,0.000105856554,0.00016394148,0.0000052275695,0.009201008,5.2302386e-7,0.000022504215,0.9863721,0.0022054971,0.0016120063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016020075,0.00016081706,0.00042416528,0.00029224655,0.00023397515,0.000026311522,0.0012544208,0.0000031815737,0.0003693945,0.9362036,0.0593463,0.00008357307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000064011933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017872379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90167683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009205429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009123532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5583331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199590","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.8444","title":"Frustrated and Aware","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Tartu Ülikool","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04706731336458759,"score_gpt":0.2870231179197723,"score_spread":0.23995580455518473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050903328,0.013268464,0.00013998225,0.0075512175,0.004150169,0.0002107472,0.00013548692,0.000089997564,0.9235506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61985123,0.0015917263,0.00008064972,0.0061536604,0.0006441166,0.000011471433,0.000043939897,0.000009699235,0.37161347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904966,0.0000479424,0.00032228063,0.0001494679,0.000085098945,0.00034554195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999396,0.00012659117,0.00008732976,0.00016380617,0.00015817618,0.000068090645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024139209,0.00018640971,0.0002469397,0.00008387315,0.0004961795,0.00020814888,0.0001250609,0.00025807985,0.000666673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044407232,0.00016788415,0.00007929632,0.000057051206,0.0011766553,0.0003823059,0.00008765154,0.00045857797,0.00019486039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018028055,0.000038792332,0.0005170466,0.0003956811,0.000070772956,0.0000123513555,0.003997217,0.000009654272,0.0000029343307,0.9772487,0.006456734,0.011232071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034396502,0.00015469932,0.0018400016,0.00013864557,0.00008588102,0.000008424807,0.004285389,0.00019460263,0.000049247476,0.04673909,0.9459655,0.00019455413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007574435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005379188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9395088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000195163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014111465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7299602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199671","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.8416","title":"Argumentation, Cooperation, and Disagreement","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0385041081269105,"score_gpt":0.2797476144594394,"score_spread":0.24124350633252892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13015147,0.0003887339,0.0010870253,0.0030493336,0.0011757215,0.00026816863,0.000018140929,0.00008023327,0.86378115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637736,0.000062951505,0.00010248308,0.0060679168,0.0001432546,0.000018357156,0.0000367633,0.0000024198685,0.02979226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995812,0.000014387942,0.00017299653,0.000071193506,0.00005724589,0.00010296785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997287,0.00003665037,0.000037391128,0.000076597506,0.000100445825,0.000020233947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013271676,0.00006695553,0.00008249584,0.000039900748,0.00027937553,0.00011244059,0.000051647345,0.00002795366,0.0003024485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023421428,0.000052450043,0.000020279927,0.000019533656,0.00022164726,0.00025292544,0.000030541752,0.000073871044,0.00005677218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056232966,0.000014353551,0.0006610019,0.000036050096,0.000017221138,3.6170798e-7,0.008543287,0.000008479997,0.000009256216,0.9854517,0.0029606875,0.00229196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048826242,0.000111619185,0.0032619396,0.00002177676,0.000037279187,0.0000011521186,0.0052420255,0.00012961443,0.00023698193,0.036701918,0.95361644,0.00015096906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000493682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039467137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95065576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008683694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002777106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33115986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409363352","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v39i22.34542","title":"Nuance Matters: Probing Epistemic Consistency in Causal Reasoning","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne","keywords":"Epistemology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Causal reasoning; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Cognition","score_opus":0.10365670077106878,"score_gpt":0.3092672336486346,"score_spread":0.20561053287756584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409363352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.561322,0.00027886726,0.0003506624,0.033446383,0.0028874504,0.0012392234,0.000025065832,0.00015852337,0.40029186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99438345,0.0000405638,0.00014897919,0.0011550066,0.00011667348,0.000046101566,8.989463e-7,0.000014174737,0.0040941234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982509,0.00003573339,0.00070738734,0.00040696762,0.00023835355,0.00036065988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864995,0.00017995363,0.00036239656,0.00020889325,0.0005597499,0.00003904547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007184475,0.00022933277,0.00038347993,0.0001781094,0.00031145941,0.00020015545,0.00068507163,0.00010051275,0.0001328972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037876502,0.00018336874,0.00012283055,0.00021308914,0.0011742796,0.00024675354,0.00014312718,0.00054712035,0.00005370348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057145146,0.000100441284,0.0005318041,0.00020895622,0.000020002426,6.1879626e-7,0.014343416,0.00000809183,0.005502431,0.97531646,0.00033942272,0.0035712232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009178662,0.00015364308,0.00022527897,0.003945687,0.000063350475,0.0000034578688,0.028716655,0.0021424314,0.1101001,0.85104585,0.0030539378,0.0004578364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039481686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006055246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4330615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007355707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016200199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74775606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409654683","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190949945.013.8","title":"Knowledge Attributions and the Social","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07187835229587548,"score_gpt":0.24872806658930435,"score_spread":0.17684971429342888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409654683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011266172,0.00037471505,0.000042913387,0.0002826449,0.00048075183,0.0002608684,0.00037645432,0.000065178465,0.9981052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010023724,0.00027164072,0.000006455727,0.000121533565,0.00050569646,0.0000010087695,0.000036190046,0.000012962009,0.99804217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933374,0.00007133872,0.00012085539,0.0002263789,0.00008774465,0.0001599295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921346,0.00023633335,0.00012192198,0.00020048516,0.00019105482,0.00003674249],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015232302,0.00020693093,0.00034120053,0.000071484,0.0013981349,0.00007535303,0.0002675442,0.00024029355,0.00005773013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000077269015,0.00017515878,0.00022227236,0.0000020158152,0.0024643962,0.000044850778,0.00029489346,0.0005545121,0.0000016790359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052409294,0.000006185672,1.7274267e-7,0.00007748649,0.0001978361,0.0000046108757,0.012169723,2.9782248e-8,9.856056e-8,0.97056735,0.015111174,0.001812905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066247076,0.000013113082,8.748067e-7,0.000056483867,0.00043931213,6.78334e-7,0.0007182189,0.000004792422,0.000001206768,0.030010305,0.967919,0.0001735395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010475958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065970264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95280784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047847294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010488179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409661463","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190949945.013.39","title":"Epistemic Contextualism and the Sociality of Knowledge","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Sociality; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.057159959965072275,"score_gpt":0.23521137060041802,"score_spread":0.17805141063534574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409661463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000054617092,0.001015806,0.000021995575,0.00017326538,0.00047185953,0.00035285225,0.00032673104,0.00003874614,0.9975441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070164595,0.00038932974,0.000006674081,0.00013769293,0.00021171317,7.9067013e-7,0.00001730074,0.0000145636295,0.9922055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911624,0.00014412675,0.00023096467,0.0002480608,0.00011613735,0.00014448367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985284,0.00051184045,0.00031461692,0.0003256189,0.00027856996,0.00004093175],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032752476,0.00023363129,0.00059129455,0.00007103617,0.0004258398,0.000034184126,0.0003389355,0.000272103,0.00003975469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016909938,0.00019543673,0.00027494735,0.0000019942038,0.0041930573,0.000043494685,0.00028967386,0.00048389012,5.260644e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012112872,0.000008110328,5.088311e-7,0.00033518695,0.000283537,0.0000035881199,0.0200061,2.9070591e-8,6.615765e-7,0.9734248,0.003788653,0.0020276872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008883293,0.000020531008,8.157355e-7,0.00017915232,0.0004199237,6.3846926e-7,0.0010682471,0.0000032859364,0.000008035005,0.073583245,0.92366177,0.0001660393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046464824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010456814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9198731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043151627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013925917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409776382","doi":"10.1017/apa.2025.12","title":"Disagreement, Public Reason, and Epistemic Abstinence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; McGill University; University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee","keywords":"Legitimacy; Public reason; Politics; Classical liberalism; Liberalism; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Positive economics; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.03106477962561927,"score_gpt":0.26949855813710233,"score_spread":0.23843377851148306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409776382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51339686,0.00037324408,0.00005742745,0.4682474,0.0010995192,0.00009292347,0.0000117593045,0.000015055169,0.016705807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934154,0.00015061689,0.0000430754,0.0034208323,0.00089279155,0.0000017588159,7.647383e-7,0.0000059667996,0.0020687731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987715,0.00025406652,0.00040590737,0.00010009056,0.0003117234,0.00015673874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976437,0.00047132763,0.0012980074,0.0001348524,0.00040032243,0.00005178395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009113239,0.00009503383,0.00029702563,0.00007118679,0.00026918657,0.00010270403,0.0002454755,0.000038777456,0.000015934871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012830758,0.000062188104,0.00014969574,0.00011381822,0.00047895598,0.0001671798,0.000068022106,0.00044593323,0.000004081651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044822442,0.00014329547,0.055269063,0.000037942915,0.00030993173,0.0000020825485,0.0022933572,0.000002400756,0.0002474688,0.92901474,0.0074923416,0.005142577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004053283,0.00014979258,0.044540256,0.000112157075,0.00017784431,0.0000050662557,0.00073661323,0.000033875298,0.000034120843,0.90810865,0.0455685,0.0001278079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048244932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006441722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48001856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001821532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084376145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25359574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409797367","doi":"10.3138/topia-2023-0062","title":"Time, History, Freedom, and the Machiavellian Problem","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06684373785396978,"score_gpt":0.2583511898585836,"score_spread":0.19150745200461378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409797367","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09312169,0.51487744,0.0000036275644,0.07373941,0.011000765,0.00041154318,0.000050171693,0.000049469156,0.3067459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79024124,0.0024544082,0.00014114782,0.0013141533,0.0043742987,0.000007849867,0.0000024714043,0.00002285658,0.2014416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930805,0.0000782438,0.00024982492,0.00008397278,0.00010161105,0.00017826857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935263,0.00012905471,0.00008649212,0.000059703656,0.0002506469,0.00012147464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039584067,0.00011529172,0.00027130838,0.000059249607,0.00035709335,0.00013432204,0.0001282829,0.000029229981,0.00032626724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059686623,0.000057652724,0.000121086436,0.000017986962,0.0021368233,0.00018042779,0.0000128536485,0.0003020978,0.000032383603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008796922,0.0000021592614,0.000024860601,0.00008350448,0.00039773196,0.00005105938,0.20088708,0.0000027805236,0.0000040126033,0.62686515,0.17029656,0.0013762838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002189551,0.000054133903,0.00004386363,0.00011709735,0.00012497386,0.000058251535,0.011732767,0.000013333187,0.0000017530987,0.012862664,0.9746827,0.000089528985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007163893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1243404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8043861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014233895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023085698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409834334","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.101912","title":"Same modality, different field: Repositioned, not redefined","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Veterinary Medical Association","funders":"","keywords":"Modality (human–computer interaction); Field (mathematics); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.044939760027195574,"score_gpt":0.342027997293893,"score_spread":0.2970882372666974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409834334","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38013116,0.004461743,0.0039692624,0.58371615,0.0056897136,0.00006657564,0.0000032842308,0.000023895338,0.021938236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907651,0.0007051437,0.00008455025,0.006945634,0.0007065879,6.6601484e-7,5.124564e-7,0.000001440842,0.0007903923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988136,0.000101013924,0.0003470598,0.00009616836,0.0005415695,0.00010057937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902296,0.0005268729,0.00020282141,0.000050750772,0.00011736229,0.00007922863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015160384,0.00005731228,0.00016615457,0.00013979395,0.0003753603,0.00019895789,0.00016744825,0.0000359634,0.00009953152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007289674,0.00003643512,0.00005980729,0.000047936388,0.0006445975,0.00020051481,0.000028418204,0.00023277874,9.093098e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003489659,0.00013660973,0.0058526085,0.00008066031,0.00006470993,0.00002577656,0.014461534,0.000009946497,0.00018382518,0.81097317,0.033644956,0.13453132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042089433,0.00072767766,0.027954994,0.0015968257,0.0003729917,0.00034318407,0.04752332,0.022991108,0.0025200555,0.52033085,0.37077564,0.00065438973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000095928626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003360028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6106339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012554836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013425457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2887006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409984353","doi":"10.1080/13869795.2025.2496817","title":"Self-deception as normative violation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Explorations","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Normative; Psychology; Self-deception; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07557690353509351,"score_gpt":0.3090523426107769,"score_spread":0.2334754390756834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409984353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014235566,0.00018434625,0.007698125,0.12853645,0.00199575,0.0006052745,0.000049007383,0.00065821654,0.84603727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938834,0.00006252505,0.00038904577,0.00267471,0.0010322466,0.00011333116,0.00013019964,0.00001115533,0.001703407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906605,0.00013078003,0.00029815143,0.00019950536,0.0001557628,0.00014972838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991511,0.00018636757,0.000084067855,0.00021051746,0.000315575,0.000052354848],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018569428,0.00013053116,0.00016630397,0.00013817172,0.0006511236,0.000120467506,0.0001160647,0.000093164184,0.0003149825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014695425,0.00012198096,0.00009381302,0.00010298142,0.00025471713,0.00060109154,0.00003620521,0.00030198114,0.00084946264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009557608,0.00013851868,0.000014339961,0.000028065873,0.000043630156,5.778799e-7,0.017933829,0.000017073855,0.00004929215,0.98053896,0.00090008194,0.0003260868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020704647,0.00005863192,0.00004194768,0.00002444238,0.000056614364,4.624066e-7,0.0015331378,0.0007237082,0.00008731078,0.8933348,0.10381084,0.00012106187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002563765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014788524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9796478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049459013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008875485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410776358","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000493","title":"Beliefs about what disadvantaged groups would do with power shape advantaged groups’ (un)willingness to relinquish it.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada); Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Psychology; Social psychology; Power (physics); Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.04563694342867145,"score_gpt":0.3472128670252905,"score_spread":0.301575923596619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410776358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94218105,0.00247636,0.0006804459,0.042656723,0.003775415,0.0002077702,0.00003496087,0.000025195148,0.007962078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96692216,0.0009313856,0.00021756304,0.029039795,0.0017134709,0.0000072492785,0.000008289849,0.000025905501,0.0011341779],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977783,0.00042450943,0.0006758488,0.0003740982,0.00033660352,0.000410656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984724,0.00026915953,0.00043475415,0.00018203733,0.00049854896,0.00014312312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001508206,0.0002819119,0.0007495636,0.00015760344,0.0009166761,0.00030432604,0.00032076705,0.00038457927,0.0005044673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008378138,0.00022896256,0.00026414168,0.00011177076,0.0012266099,0.00061260595,0.00005863424,0.0015196986,0.000009930968],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022099197,0.00090711145,0.0068606655,0.00027186362,0.00091432576,0.00013291572,0.56060034,0.0000019890813,0.00031859498,0.40104592,0.009841095,0.01689525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006076309,0.0021037247,0.13421544,0.00068274385,0.0005600893,0.00015599049,0.27706373,0.0000034070836,0.00002526704,0.08412592,0.49398685,0.0010005119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027824075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040855733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48414576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048749567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008488213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9336822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410796526","doi":"10.18357/kula.301","title":"Demanding Epistemic Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Johannesburg","keywords":"Epistemology; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.11715493346736171,"score_gpt":0.4203570675310338,"score_spread":0.3032021340636721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410796526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067927234,0.017665667,0.0023840894,0.009401915,0.0019939449,0.0005079787,0.00001713246,0.00023510659,0.89986694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6687749,0.0010712874,0.00008752683,0.00019662405,0.00027711064,0.0000900153,0.000065161476,0.000009597825,0.32942778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895704,0.00014041644,0.00037042462,0.00026286885,0.00012045876,0.00014879717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976115,0.0011156708,0.00014722669,0.00015702816,0.00093432365,0.00003424416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005805492,0.00016336874,0.0002622809,0.0002262445,0.0008986721,0.00015143408,0.000093561306,0.000072590155,0.00007843501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010951951,0.00014871477,0.000052972537,0.00014113948,0.00038219683,0.00040522488,0.00007622665,0.0001243858,0.000025107754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015439524,0.000053154206,0.001575525,0.00061210815,0.000117819916,2.0277007e-7,0.10807846,0.0000025118145,0.00015058336,0.8640202,0.019571384,0.0058025606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006182928,0.000040804818,0.009269069,0.00074667594,0.00054260355,0.0000011334955,0.058914676,0.0015571299,0.00084091467,0.09342563,0.83368754,0.00035549983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014440719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035539138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8141162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000590712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003270917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.691195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411274175","doi":"10.1007/s10670-025-00977-x","title":"Epistemic Rationality Begins Unreflectively","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Rationality; Ontology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05687095642354797,"score_gpt":0.3090321360568537,"score_spread":0.25216117963330575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411274175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045409366,0.0005552275,0.0011145767,0.010784338,0.0025990638,0.00023349444,0.000077609875,0.00018056891,0.9390457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.877264,0.000023364915,0.0001229292,0.0023721156,0.000547486,0.000028998882,0.000030910232,0.000010794604,0.119599365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990667,0.00012696578,0.00023102794,0.00024231776,0.00013044698,0.00020252274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992074,0.00023769606,0.000074416996,0.00024377518,0.00019870806,0.000038019225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035274168,0.00013195182,0.00020465678,0.00008244539,0.00045879668,0.00009298778,0.00016843555,0.00007279337,0.0005838255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010100053,0.00012188193,0.000117993055,0.000059541693,0.00048315013,0.00013963813,0.000042808602,0.00024160482,0.00018559919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001272179,0.00005832827,0.0005215114,0.000048080412,0.00007004751,0.0000016806778,0.0064038546,0.0000018335036,0.0001621904,0.9744167,0.017215941,0.0010871225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025785484,0.000030258454,0.0025290877,0.000033579505,0.000042884236,8.8076604e-7,0.0012642975,0.000024145169,0.00038420258,0.2605754,0.73470885,0.00014855787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036423016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017723523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83185464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006481804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014853828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.639248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411420836","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2025.2519272","title":"“Epistemic Blame and Positive Epistemic Norms: On Ichikawa’s <i>Epistemic Courage</i> ”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Courage; Blame; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.06230323943560859,"score_gpt":0.3444219502833311,"score_spread":0.28211871084772255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411420836","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42616785,0.01322435,0.00012716958,0.48148617,0.009642659,0.0003481975,0.0002119207,0.00006769027,0.068724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882479,0.0022006293,0.000049168088,0.0048560603,0.002582745,0.000007355111,0.000007864412,0.000019072135,0.0020292348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773574,0.00018227733,0.0009288853,0.00028948893,0.00061723695,0.00024636046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99644166,0.0011533237,0.0005908846,0.00015504773,0.0015639246,0.00009515606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006755048,0.00030167063,0.00068109104,0.00029694452,0.0003133342,0.00014018998,0.00049330737,0.00011707371,0.000033530912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000537613,0.00022929476,0.00028675343,0.000053151387,0.0013260649,0.00025139368,0.00017786841,0.0008363679,0.000024827606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040376806,0.00021422128,0.00040131586,0.00009200178,0.0020411327,0.00015086983,0.007692497,0.000014368033,0.00034542658,0.9848881,0.0021834767,0.0015728717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016857049,0.0005562994,0.0007373487,0.0016089262,0.00026149338,0.0001789378,0.0037016773,0.00001839013,0.0003417718,0.97506475,0.015526115,0.00031856383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003759482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000100904035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024317123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010577713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9350369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411426840","doi":"10.1017/s1477175625000168","title":"Vice-Charging and Epistemic Vices of Consequence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Think","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Domain (mathematical analysis); Vice president; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Psychology; Mathematics; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.040367214234454614,"score_gpt":0.27684798149628,"score_spread":0.23648076726182538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411426840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6361732,0.003370494,0.00007165582,0.003886229,0.0007870834,0.00014319585,0.000022561833,0.00008235688,0.35546324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873174,0.00012864379,0.00010620896,0.0009915313,0.000082404695,0.0000028419931,0.0000027479698,0.0000048635534,0.011363392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994878,0.00004889531,0.00017150096,0.00012263359,0.0000623574,0.00010682093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994541,0.00022414808,0.00007966512,0.00014018962,0.000082547194,0.00001939092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002579585,0.00007556117,0.00017820485,0.00005362728,0.00015520432,0.000033005133,0.000095763855,0.000042026015,0.000097192766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035963043,0.000065616914,0.000033192384,0.000021574608,0.0006419076,0.0000876761,0.000036021145,0.00013220981,0.0000134732945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073627275,0.000011712845,0.00022617046,0.0002521579,0.000032671927,0.0000032793503,0.029793726,4.945926e-7,0.0011572764,0.967573,0.00027497835,0.00066719874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007646995,0.00010550679,0.0010787294,0.00074361946,0.00017933812,0.000015114042,0.021608949,0.00015652734,0.0074308305,0.8036523,0.16388798,0.00037641003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046424876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043281796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35114416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008330127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048512124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26757804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411747412","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2025.2521673","title":"Group respect","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.1127039417008866,"score_gpt":0.32857921477529106,"score_spread":0.21587527307440446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411747412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09473933,0.0010618945,0.00036012623,0.002326123,0.0075697885,0.00011663524,0.000007954649,0.00017441381,0.89364374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93849343,0.000030142093,0.000066418,0.0027255334,0.0018016108,0.000012454809,0.000008278222,0.000009495815,0.05685262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943966,0.00005477983,0.0001380814,0.00014754926,0.00007297824,0.00014695388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995519,0.00012341572,0.000031638792,0.00021691273,0.000054648055,0.000021476557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021072911,0.000077756566,0.00012710322,0.00006890452,0.00024345318,0.00006449137,0.00012993197,0.000050533854,0.00037393745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004604746,0.00006813339,0.00007021758,0.00002811468,0.00057098764,0.00008392495,0.000040916406,0.00016937203,0.00020673804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008938147,0.00003083958,0.000084419305,0.00002849046,0.00002714615,0.0000043727914,0.017453238,2.1588824e-7,0.000074097894,0.9412526,0.039113447,0.0019221841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014679038,0.00003773445,0.00029225502,0.000027384165,0.000017824212,4.257687e-7,0.0035038153,0.0000028039979,0.00010174835,0.11217999,0.883611,0.00007821993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011163528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005590885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84449756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016504822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023294378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4094353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411750739","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i2.9636","title":"Meta-Arguments, Para-Arguments, and Intentionally Bad Arguments","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11482985345442225,"score_gpt":0.30106749596354343,"score_spread":0.18623764250912117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411750739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102511436,0.0042358926,0.00057121826,0.0034504293,0.0032372468,0.00087876857,0.00016683865,0.00026688157,0.8846813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8309515,0.00039088514,0.0005888101,0.012022675,0.00026576972,0.00013997353,0.00016579553,0.00001886228,0.15545574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984504,0.000057315086,0.000557608,0.00026607988,0.00027107503,0.0003975336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915713,0.00010088315,0.00018715454,0.00026808734,0.00020054268,0.000086196436],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005185051,0.0002778975,0.00046578547,0.00016330593,0.00046430077,0.00025011064,0.00026709272,0.00011829694,0.0015267807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047804122,0.00021153035,0.00025809163,0.000055977256,0.0004988599,0.0006272105,0.00019746435,0.00032312013,0.00026323044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038472932,0.000118561526,0.0013187627,0.00009955706,0.002011323,0.00000589728,0.0029485011,0.000004887104,0.000025123556,0.98755443,0.0039358903,0.0019385917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010063924,0.00019021709,0.0047521438,0.000042516658,0.0014622727,0.0000059043027,0.0016570783,0.000056618737,0.00015942089,0.09319622,0.89708745,0.00038377853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000121264864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001779585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8943582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003185559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000063323896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412273931","doi":"","title":"Nyere nordisk retsfilosofi","year":2011,"lang":"da","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.25053028516820985,"score_gpt":0.2873043208233573,"score_spread":0.03677403565514742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412273931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15236191,0.010032149,0.00022273569,0.001168432,0.0004934763,0.0011848934,0.0005935505,0.000056476183,0.8338864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47341287,0.0012630993,0.0002029044,0.00003520491,0.00009253571,1.00137036e-7,0.0000506694,0.000031234315,0.5249114],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935888,0.0024509912,0.0004398219,0.00089875597,0.001437648,0.0011840013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99414307,0.0010395738,0.00069187983,0.0016962618,0.0019340802,0.00049513555],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003526984,0.00048698817,0.0011123827,0.00038027874,0.004638349,0.0000717762,0.0034139333,0.00048069653,0.7346324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015746205,0.0005350211,0.000776004,0.0006062475,0.008894855,0.0009714313,0.0023522293,0.0014637455,0.155848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017502469,0.00049586926,0.000012704348,0.00055530894,0.00089142827,0.00037549814,0.11038701,0.00000529252,0.0006578126,0.023087312,0.86025155,0.0015299588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015906151,0.00085441174,0.0025787614,0.0002570401,0.00050164567,0.000008258311,0.12005479,0.00005765422,0.0009685539,0.00026016377,0.87238675,0.00048133679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014846415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014376964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57878435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040870902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095702265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412910056","doi":"10.1007/s11229-025-05167-4","title":"Inferentialism and collaged assertions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of language; Philosophy of science; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Programming language; Computer science","score_opus":0.03634273392466699,"score_gpt":0.27989537609713594,"score_spread":0.24355264217246894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412910056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26022434,0.00046877694,0.00020279006,0.003730475,0.0014628961,0.0001589252,0.000029132225,0.00010730734,0.73361534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9306322,0.000041036077,0.000043817494,0.00046893233,0.00015126867,0.000014700851,0.0000038834246,0.0000054163206,0.06863876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995468,0.00006770563,0.000114216135,0.00011390461,0.00005024912,0.00010708262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995177,0.00022010406,0.000026499178,0.0001415443,0.0000684972,0.00002566254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016382885,0.00006878082,0.00011928406,0.000061101186,0.00027609873,0.00009444415,0.000064614534,0.000043668337,0.0003252206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014306784,0.000059243725,0.000038077596,0.000022548269,0.0003067072,0.000072405746,0.000033471384,0.00010634235,0.000036089317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039227107,0.00003378884,0.00025235832,0.00003809969,0.00004372519,0.0000010915901,0.007179873,1.9803777e-7,0.00026911206,0.9859222,0.0043930416,0.0018625661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016430713,0.000017313632,0.00089146104,0.000057917605,0.00006892378,5.5012543e-7,0.0049922653,0.000023457531,0.00063423876,0.071288496,0.9217468,0.00011428292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029242501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022099742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91735375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008422441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042191503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35609373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413291949","doi":"10.1017/epi.2025.10066","title":"Contractualism and Moral Disagreement","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Contractualism; Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.054624415589601946,"score_gpt":0.27772789356566324,"score_spread":0.22310347797606128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413291949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09932135,0.0021723106,0.00017545314,0.012050112,0.0026610864,0.00030888428,0.000044166616,0.0001157436,0.8831509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89325297,0.000039825496,0.00004290274,0.00229226,0.00035473282,0.000016098547,0.00001140067,0.0000073125793,0.103982516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992746,0.000061435916,0.00021047046,0.00018080084,0.00009365531,0.00017902115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995173,0.00013840088,0.00005467533,0.00018184005,0.00006556941,0.000042169264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002517862,0.000112644324,0.00020307046,0.00004652235,0.00024970225,0.000101448546,0.0000913342,0.000046596866,0.00028281705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003984578,0.00009527548,0.000056033405,0.000017001592,0.00052148534,0.000097579396,0.000046717567,0.00014144687,0.00004998041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008006484,0.000035989677,0.0005040353,0.00007611787,0.000049911097,0.0000037535601,0.01033295,2.1361355e-7,0.000028757717,0.9776134,0.009472272,0.0018746131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045396233,0.000043398424,0.0017177587,0.00005485363,0.000052427193,0.0000010653971,0.0021936486,0.00002813374,0.00008361927,0.08080033,0.91442406,0.00014676343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003191214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010396447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90495175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018294908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027308995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38852215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W44134613","doi":"","title":"Commentary on Barron","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.05452034162860032,"score_gpt":0.23837280973849523,"score_spread":0.18385246810989492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W44134613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8839143,0.0001116498,0.000012823926,0.00961871,0.000621441,0.00017043423,0.00007112086,0.00009116637,0.105388336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96852005,0.00006657267,0.0001049542,0.0039768848,0.00044861736,3.4638484e-7,0.00006760983,0.00002569277,0.026789248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847734,0.00022982273,0.00017907198,0.00036663562,0.00037182437,0.00037529497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988385,0.0001746109,0.00018340438,0.00047730037,0.00015872152,0.0001674849],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005294096,0.00022400268,0.0003462672,0.00020510463,0.0009917087,0.00004244847,0.00052288495,0.00016753253,0.0038560112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003518017,0.00025980157,0.00025357306,0.00008740658,0.0008127013,0.00056943885,0.00016226397,0.0005988596,0.00065057067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034671489,0.0026381437,0.2173663,0.00047079625,0.0012736962,0.0007560817,0.20970735,0.000097722266,0.0051996014,0.35197678,0.19520152,0.011844859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018495992,0.0004995081,0.025941545,0.000118534874,0.00015419626,0.000009940583,0.013599396,0.000014318965,0.0005216178,0.0066239755,0.9501558,0.0005115986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044113625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003050758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7549542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010740332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035035773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413876466","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10019","title":"Bergmann’s Intuitions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; General interest","score_opus":0.0776643556991139,"score_gpt":0.25904500497105193,"score_spread":0.18138064927193803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413876466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01741108,0.012551682,0.00014102751,0.052256532,0.014445068,0.00011628359,0.0002628421,0.000047440473,0.9027681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899186,0.000028459886,0.000052014337,0.0011862613,0.0056897136,0.0000013290895,0.0000052649475,0.000019230245,0.0030991584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993312,0.000038545266,0.0002606643,0.000084248786,0.00010005362,0.00018531556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992152,0.000068103815,0.00006396501,0.00010301985,0.00021019169,0.00033951196],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022824317,0.000092205024,0.00015745878,0.00034623893,0.00024022655,0.00020556727,0.0001694072,0.00004901698,0.0013610808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044218537,0.00007982904,0.00018086855,0.00004547847,0.00041684372,0.00026028662,0.0000048023726,0.00042083382,0.0001943147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012282362,0.0000056170675,0.000015530151,0.000043735985,0.00007549998,0.00022609215,0.012089678,0.0000030213146,0.000006752372,0.9568421,0.029641034,0.0010496799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043273463,0.00005966961,0.000011931977,0.00010062047,0.000036943904,0.000044773802,0.00028661243,0.000004362565,0.000008122077,0.44881228,0.5505288,0.00006256397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014255659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032919567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9725075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007460081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078814715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413968291","doi":"10.1007/s42330-025-00385-x","title":"Beyond Blind Trust and Informed Trust: Earned Trust? A Critique of Osborne and Allchin (2024)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Science education; Psychology; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020367193541937247,"score_gpt":0.28653409422347204,"score_spread":0.2661669006815348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413968291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761993,0.0016022382,0.00004273335,0.006773055,0.00064112124,0.00013688703,0.0000078356225,0.000005383826,0.01459143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950236,0.00022129185,0.002428978,0.00023931725,0.000053144693,0.000004733324,6.9884493e-7,0.0000049717805,0.002023263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992142,0.000010161367,0.00037276684,0.0001221838,0.000092459115,0.0001882688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988752,0.00008287237,0.0002574206,0.0001367002,0.0004894898,0.00015833045],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071348355,0.00009759097,0.0002480948,0.0011466168,0.00039486412,0.00012896785,0.00019853495,0.000108601926,0.00003317375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067881716,0.00008334178,0.000020819063,0.00025979,0.004396657,0.00026150153,0.000024941652,0.0002612155,3.9848308e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028204483,0.00003334949,0.0023920552,0.00018817105,0.000018592955,0.0000012677073,0.018194117,1.1255671e-7,0.00020114408,0.9680019,0.00042508618,0.010541393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052083586,0.00023440029,0.0022032307,0.000420444,0.00011014773,0.000132192,0.08220761,0.00017317515,0.0010350635,0.8940833,0.018705161,0.0001744191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000456781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00604457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07391857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042390082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028207896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99831283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414240826","doi":"10.22329/cjpp.v8i1.7796","title":"Preface to Volume 8 (2022)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Practical Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Range (aeronautics)","score_opus":0.09953812264309043,"score_gpt":0.29096015140746273,"score_spread":0.1914220287643723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414240826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040750153,0.0012767563,0.00033732413,0.40451095,0.012062441,0.0004432771,0.00034179853,0.0000330682,0.5402442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98105514,0.00000386176,0.00032527884,0.009368878,0.0026217694,0.0000067906954,0.0000037806349,0.000026337108,0.0065881545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985985,0.00024844657,0.00036565604,0.00014457232,0.00031921617,0.00032356384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827206,0.00017328064,0.00022406928,0.00019411111,0.00029584012,0.00084063585],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007945081,0.00011937,0.0002497004,0.00026308477,0.0007443221,0.000116051924,0.00029662612,0.000038112885,0.0074424697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000584555,0.00011780881,0.00015315502,0.00008024865,0.00027926153,0.00031426726,0.000041880332,0.0010723884,0.00019622686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004426982,0.000056987283,0.00012008667,0.000014715422,0.00008057494,0.00044755358,0.010218356,0.000054929405,0.000018437533,0.8664421,0.12201154,0.00049045903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015272068,0.00046692873,0.000045841854,0.000008403513,0.000045957266,0.00014086302,0.0012521425,0.000005956236,0.0000071288573,0.14395933,0.85378844,0.00012628252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016606967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008951269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.940305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020439822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001344972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414240837","doi":"10.22329/cjpp.v12i1.10468","title":"MacIntyre, Moore and the Fact-Value Distinction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Practical Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Proposition; Key (lock); Compatibilism; Consequentialism; Incompatibilism","score_opus":0.05580748947750942,"score_gpt":0.291186149047623,"score_spread":0.2353786595701136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414240837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014622127,0.002073541,0.0008445852,0.28353965,0.0043438515,0.00024658715,0.00004307585,0.000012509592,0.69427407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99313813,0.00003678306,0.000095842675,0.004062296,0.0012468055,0.0000017367379,0.0000016086925,0.000007816058,0.0014089608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910676,0.00021091492,0.00030313592,0.00009571756,0.000113316164,0.00017016953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986068,0.00060488045,0.00018457585,0.00012948316,0.00024685045,0.00022739664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065778225,0.00010210668,0.00022904683,0.00013033902,0.0004770518,0.00017552338,0.000118461525,0.00006457599,0.0001930142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097390957,0.000066028624,0.00010998347,0.00004099686,0.0014653917,0.00026128808,0.000012802436,0.0006639378,0.000014689403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006512137,0.000011376792,0.00011853621,0.00002525695,0.00008779688,0.00003673628,0.002062593,0.000001982578,0.0000014627888,0.9918627,0.0048311115,0.0008953082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005325238,0.000053782605,0.00021915002,0.00004315523,0.00013201706,0.000049754974,0.00062024023,0.000027657481,0.0000059052863,0.6823976,0.3158557,0.000062479696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023379289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007575571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97851604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051742758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005602963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5399297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414331524","doi":"10.1111/japp.70050","title":"The Epistemic Harms of Botched Apologies for Past Wrongs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation; Public Health Agency of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Silence; Reciprocal; Exploit; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.049895031536452535,"score_gpt":0.2816146781738573,"score_spread":0.2317196466374048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414331524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08453963,0.005730201,0.0023228067,0.10534028,0.00909936,0.0015825905,0.00012925384,0.000090816946,0.79116505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99605596,0.00015327985,0.00040217434,0.0007232482,0.001594372,0.000018200426,0.0000023996572,0.000013626743,0.0010367205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988412,0.000033448043,0.0006603352,0.00010855923,0.0001692628,0.00018714665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979145,0.00079003675,0.00068080984,0.00021233765,0.00036771616,0.000034618275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007424429,0.00014073197,0.00041683466,0.000100971796,0.00033614977,0.00006124463,0.00040671264,0.00008153062,0.000014773054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000616811,0.00008754153,0.00028612686,0.000042454107,0.0008676613,0.00007444287,0.000045582427,0.00032205152,0.000003847892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033564828,0.000065157124,0.000019318124,0.0001676188,0.0002357198,7.6378757e-7,0.004267935,0.000013640393,0.00079372135,0.98580724,0.006132113,0.0021611522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063569355,0.00014289546,0.00003138466,0.000061951425,0.00011286982,0.0000017267645,0.002620735,0.0000058619557,0.0017913545,0.84426594,0.1502493,0.000080281665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005327515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010845283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91151637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002714573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009230089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.356984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414394958","doi":"10.1007/s10670-025-01016-5","title":"What Good Are Knowledge Norms?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Canada First Research Excellence Fund","keywords":"Normative; Norm (philosophy); Ontology; Ask price; Social knowledge; Social ontology","score_opus":0.05003477379501068,"score_gpt":0.29401917793687593,"score_spread":0.24398440414186526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414394958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031737834,0.007156885,0.0000632199,0.0051816734,0.011516953,0.00020738985,0.000027078371,0.00020899443,0.9439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5840149,0.00039970048,0.000035286306,0.0020161434,0.0011294067,0.00002728265,0.00001720731,0.000019818637,0.41234025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911153,0.000075710195,0.00021639536,0.0002455672,0.0000907442,0.00026005937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991912,0.0001690428,0.00008001205,0.00033437138,0.00017434622,0.00005102801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023763528,0.00015860861,0.00025481763,0.00009640867,0.0003952468,0.00031184565,0.00022434328,0.00009514683,0.0006983104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048473594,0.00013643838,0.00014112206,0.000055399276,0.000371592,0.0003889242,0.00008032405,0.00027858544,0.0007295741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009392984,0.00014554287,0.0005443038,0.00015196734,0.00009564493,0.0000054627,0.027973013,4.883312e-7,0.000024327219,0.90465164,0.05948482,0.006913413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024345671,0.000029589171,0.0006323747,0.00015261499,0.000048577076,6.6148243e-7,0.011927204,0.000012969868,0.00020872144,0.030840043,0.9557437,0.0001601246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008178227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003918068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89625883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003203102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072025054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93774426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414525063","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.70008","title":"Duality in skepticism: Contrasting judgment and action","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Operationalization; Audit; Action (physics); Psychological intervention","score_opus":0.2942926657219079,"score_gpt":0.42199698847462525,"score_spread":0.12770432275271737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414525063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7344012,0.0016263264,0.00003639353,0.004537404,0.0006304654,0.00041719593,0.000010439245,0.00006141878,0.25827914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98908967,0.000046425343,0.00002270833,0.00042214253,0.00032698474,0.000035940808,0.000012350417,0.000011196534,0.010032575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981808,0.0004165116,0.00038190736,0.00033817426,0.00030467982,0.00037794295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819344,0.0011204785,0.000077632096,0.00021322817,0.0003536686,0.000041570518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050208312,0.00012042771,0.0002565306,0.0003504106,0.0006235001,0.00033121632,0.00016334331,0.00009370222,0.000057327834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076235924,0.00011515698,0.000040430827,0.0001440091,0.0007134712,0.00045149188,0.00015865132,0.00082461396,0.00001818494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002160727,0.0003052208,0.09343262,0.0011921069,0.00011110901,0.000036750294,0.033941958,0.0000021625128,0.0021642786,0.82876414,0.022804208,0.017029356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034409952,0.00021946621,0.053356573,0.001728801,0.000026900409,0.000003785219,0.09450846,0.0012548381,0.0015423548,0.12774171,0.71546847,0.00070764247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021588998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015523591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70102245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006784968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022629157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47955215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414692400","doi":"10.1215/00318108-11964820","title":"A Dominance Argument Against Incompleteness","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Argument (complex analysis); Outcome (game theory); Ex-ante; Ranking (information retrieval); Dominance (genetics)","score_opus":0.09144817609546423,"score_gpt":0.3230929386317196,"score_spread":0.23164476253625538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414692400","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008956377,0.10938677,0.00006697437,0.6452692,0.0008535563,0.0006550212,0.000016573431,0.00006791259,0.24278833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7694275,0.09790343,0.000049594884,0.124458194,0.0015164173,0.00023968374,0.000019374342,0.000024368726,0.0063614734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987504,0.0002490918,0.00038689832,0.00022516877,0.00017168217,0.00021678768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886763,0.00032421612,0.000111445304,0.00053022365,0.00012345274,0.000043041102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008070996,0.00016848948,0.00045823783,0.000025734671,0.00038048328,0.000044480177,0.00044686545,0.00004269213,0.00016571971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020118477,0.00009868494,0.00021018705,0.00007737453,0.00069684006,0.000055165885,0.00012685268,0.00038083593,0.0002474107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060007783,0.00005209363,0.0000024694805,0.0012653619,0.00003980796,0.0000026418472,0.00038268784,3.684039e-7,0.0000071776094,0.9853357,0.0018897009,0.011015963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000921551,0.000013282437,0.00001237375,0.0017171059,0.000076532815,6.4411233e-7,0.000016575439,0.0000056145745,0.000005755207,0.5401941,0.4577895,0.00007633189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019094501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003474744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76853186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027799228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057306253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4024255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414970603","doi":"10.1007/s11098-025-02418-5","title":"Bearing Witness, Understanding, Knowledge and the Right to be Known","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Argument (complex analysis); Injustice; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Bearing (navigation); Philosophy of mind","score_opus":0.19919867103325528,"score_gpt":0.34532894024963345,"score_spread":0.14613026921637817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414970603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009160077,0.022358645,0.00023232159,0.40639433,0.0018841545,0.00047497437,0.0000136741,0.00012592546,0.5593559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98810524,0.000638568,0.000016090891,0.0042714723,0.0009658715,0.000052470095,0.0000012976052,0.000010512639,0.005938459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903876,0.00011960949,0.00022945764,0.0002671252,0.00011668122,0.00022837985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863607,0.00094177126,0.000043322387,0.0001892295,0.00013960978,0.000049989365],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050295563,0.00017592487,0.0004085562,0.00006695077,0.0012535661,0.00008933173,0.00016550947,0.000053593078,0.000032822845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002875127,0.00010308109,0.00008778903,0.00007152572,0.0029462588,0.00006717971,0.00031792547,0.00030286252,0.000022014447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004543078,0.000037485523,0.00005178349,0.00010025931,0.00027888085,0.0000016672586,0.035855293,5.092672e-7,0.0000019423267,0.959551,0.0039463704,0.0001294288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049618643,0.000032887652,0.00003247856,0.000073757095,0.000105869556,5.086538e-7,0.0041667535,0.000009398065,0.000011756075,0.8126736,0.18228632,0.00011046426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042441705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001289039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9789452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006171222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023835291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415098404","doi":"10.1111/papq.70004","title":"Pulling Down the Hierarchy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Meaning (existential); Focus (optics); Value (mathematics); Word (group theory)","score_opus":0.04134218617910647,"score_gpt":0.2678413251231641,"score_spread":0.22649913894405765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415098404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011252508,0.0005840116,0.00049284654,0.1341893,0.0026162479,0.00030912587,0.000033392294,0.00021066671,0.8503119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842296,0.000014243867,0.000033622968,0.0021038952,0.001917864,0.00004705076,0.000012318764,0.000016673494,0.011624697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840677,0.00021681054,0.00037619745,0.0003475649,0.000239838,0.0004128263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986719,0.00049003854,0.00008089805,0.0005270634,0.00014516471,0.00008492688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059765996,0.00021477319,0.0002889495,0.00010023009,0.0010160494,0.0002491383,0.00040145573,0.00012158059,0.00030790226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054804314,0.00014235449,0.00020866055,0.000091226604,0.0011868471,0.00014340559,0.000024636121,0.00073619385,0.00026437402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025476129,0.00007779142,0.000016077967,0.0000386042,0.000064794716,0.0000057295556,0.022606786,6.8065725e-7,0.00006501565,0.9696529,0.0025586793,0.0048874626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001928595,0.00013349905,0.00003164772,0.000033127388,0.00003812071,0.0000019159252,0.0039429357,0.000079689045,0.000018608027,0.7901318,0.20525156,0.00014420663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033261706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000062549254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9729771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026449483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006973865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78147334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415604132","doi":"10.5840/idpp2009/2010163","title":"Countries Included","year":2009,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Directory of Philosophy and Philosophers","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Government (linguistics); Information system; Developed country","score_opus":0.06193190440709293,"score_gpt":0.3078542651100662,"score_spread":0.24592236070297327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415604132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075105526,0.01417445,0.000019380688,0.044018768,0.007196024,0.00046204732,0.0008684587,0.00012097815,0.8580344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98599386,0.0024611482,0.00008353722,0.004026955,0.005372968,0.000007808175,0.000066255976,0.000036958594,0.0019504824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699587,0.00020492522,0.0010004884,0.0006388116,0.0007772861,0.00038264395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976297,0.00040885006,0.00066602434,0.00037687688,0.0007018093,0.00021674985],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005212285,0.0005516513,0.0007936352,0.00033232875,0.00050927454,0.00017922359,0.0005878844,0.00028675882,0.0015213907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013060165,0.0005678487,0.00038783604,0.00007902751,0.0024136337,0.0006291161,0.00010590085,0.00057654554,0.00006239171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041410243,0.0004316757,0.00043191205,0.00021025988,0.000577144,0.000020219604,0.011001463,0.000011596394,0.00036751272,0.98337704,0.0011173402,0.0020397177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010963724,0.000518201,0.0014212602,0.00045067206,0.00020337201,0.000009793928,0.00033544132,0.000061789884,0.0005071977,0.8366117,0.15819822,0.0005859915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000114514376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022557088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9108884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008685084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013171541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415981529","doi":"10.1017/epi.2025.10088","title":"Curiosity and Mental Search","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Curiosity; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Norm (philosophy); Metacognition","score_opus":0.0496375096589411,"score_gpt":0.2948370538143552,"score_spread":0.24519954415541412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415981529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34949905,0.00157623,0.000053579668,0.00959162,0.0018469305,0.00023938877,0.000039862967,0.00009805675,0.6370553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90921247,0.00006164218,0.000042403582,0.0011369325,0.00025202252,0.0000062893055,0.000010088806,0.0000064512747,0.0892717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993635,0.00007571963,0.00013601528,0.00016882193,0.00009294753,0.00016301053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999644,0.00008688985,0.000023615657,0.00015157969,0.000055943234,0.00003799633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028661027,0.00008612614,0.00014814406,0.000050964918,0.0003693305,0.00008417829,0.00009159697,0.000041135085,0.00022942488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001759948,0.0000769334,0.000046676763,0.000021571028,0.0005307981,0.00008799498,0.00007641252,0.00017064402,0.000064177286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008958079,0.00003941076,0.0020478852,0.00012603804,0.000040534287,0.0000026467471,0.012681261,1.1190384e-7,0.00009854527,0.97234297,0.011141361,0.0014702828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003706045,0.000049568665,0.0021193621,0.00005387191,0.00002364023,0.0000018678456,0.0030279728,0.000042759057,0.00038717798,0.029356848,0.96442115,0.0001451629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003108517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070993026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9532798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021264479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033406355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3137253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416132973","doi":"10.1007/s11229-025-05342-7","title":"Justification does not aggregate: de-generalizing the lottery paradox","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Reductio ad absurdum; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of science; Metaphysics; Probabilistic logic; Conjunction (astronomy)","score_opus":0.05240397940437524,"score_gpt":0.2845809836993515,"score_spread":0.23217700429497623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416132973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69776374,0.0021833319,0.0014274521,0.07429433,0.0072713085,0.0006567834,0.000105510284,0.00038878372,0.21590875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9585375,0.000105301006,0.0000799845,0.002837774,0.0006448232,0.000040611387,0.0000059155623,0.000011518336,0.03773655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991761,0.00016673998,0.00018515285,0.00017411471,0.000095163334,0.00020272177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990409,0.0004266668,0.000079161255,0.00035393084,0.00007479628,0.000024542345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054663816,0.000107905915,0.0001351307,0.000050169045,0.00045182306,0.0001462706,0.000231216,0.000058407808,0.00014757838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018605155,0.00006175856,0.000085523294,0.000031426414,0.00045784196,0.00009270767,0.000036528345,0.00019200603,0.000083879466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017904418,0.00004178839,0.00019137796,0.000093111645,0.000065017586,0.0000026884195,0.019431284,0.000009266691,0.0046431534,0.961663,0.004083586,0.009757806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018021376,0.000019815245,0.0006697462,0.00019323797,0.00019638508,0.0000025035004,0.013038041,0.00026408822,0.046953063,0.09868927,0.83949643,0.00029720517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004352953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000820194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86297375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027399625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055239376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34751034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416965781","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2524788122","title":"Reply to Neveu and Neveu: Inference in an information-restricted environment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Feature (linguistics); Interpretation (philosophy); Stability (learning theory)","score_opus":0.07094397723564619,"score_gpt":0.3159769722627033,"score_spread":0.24503299502705714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416965781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601833,0.000046351106,0.0000023689513,0.012090413,0.000034899884,0.00018719875,0.000013339334,0.000007699765,0.02743438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963083,0.000022443164,0.00033659846,0.002940179,0.000030954478,0.000009436957,1.9527435e-7,8.7653655e-7,0.00035101344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999171,0.000006239469,0.0002669474,0.000111227666,0.00035827575,0.000086278786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995199,0.0001450634,0.00016919419,0.000007596622,0.00013709054,0.0000211436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006213812,0.00005616522,0.000099343946,0.00020433447,0.00017273049,0.000053218897,0.00033496227,0.00003551127,0.000011348596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049389584,0.00003959208,0.000018406241,0.00017532971,0.0007970421,0.0009244294,0.00009942562,0.00012422766,0.0000012980041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076835295,0.000025951496,0.00664179,0.000047723708,0.0000046331666,1.090476e-9,0.007795331,0.00008195178,0.0023479376,0.98181885,0.0004776527,0.00075047056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038498864,0.00016670207,0.37731257,0.00023520713,0.0000191041,6.338397e-7,0.0068693315,0.0011426128,0.01114122,0.54513556,0.057390388,0.0002016863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006657053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000019237918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43668333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001843352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032529035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2936735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417315573","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v30i7.3854","title":"Reframing Epistemic Partiality: A Case for Acceptance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Rationality; Analogy; Philosophy of science; Doxastic logic; Cognition; Friendship; Dimension (graph theory)","score_opus":0.15584821091684672,"score_gpt":0.37081291333517863,"score_spread":0.2149647024183319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417315573","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3203347,0.008945849,0.0052035837,0.54686755,0.012312086,0.00097091997,0.00028010152,0.00008208547,0.1050031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910424,0.00014301018,0.00022841497,0.0044007846,0.0032897128,0.00000534143,0.0000020143095,0.000012007631,0.0008763442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987887,0.00022490774,0.0005181857,0.00012855986,0.00016845531,0.00017115966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977262,0.0010097043,0.0004119188,0.000084637635,0.00072129304,0.000046262066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021777279,0.00012455622,0.0003875545,0.00009133865,0.0012549048,0.00014382016,0.00012189568,0.00023409125,0.000012731801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042319868,0.000109054105,0.00023749482,0.000034505694,0.00065993547,0.00017941231,0.00003440428,0.0012101015,6.999005e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062382605,0.000044277658,0.000023079254,0.0003746211,0.00012700196,0.000051302923,0.05022031,4.9226765e-7,0.00003620643,0.9465558,0.0007339708,0.0017705577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053469697,0.0001105771,0.000009518134,0.00010826739,0.0001420979,0.000037810074,0.005833009,0.00001060379,0.000026613112,0.8722496,0.12082891,0.00010829903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050062918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023380121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67070764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033067234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020083682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96518403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4466147","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-2363-4_13","title":"Towards a Philosophy of Argument","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Argumentation library","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Argument map; Variety (cybernetics); Confusion; Construct (python library); Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08732303712556261,"score_gpt":0.2476586354953577,"score_spread":0.16033559836979508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4466147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000108480825,0.00080596877,0.00001359653,0.00080306886,0.0011501783,0.00030126428,0.0002697803,0.00010291046,0.99644476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019165467,0.0007406574,0.0005191542,0.0021804448,0.0015152415,0.000025806308,0.0007702447,0.00011323864,0.97496974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998745,0.000032217577,0.00052458636,0.0002910791,0.00025349925,0.00015359555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899966,0.000050184106,0.00049643364,0.00031560982,0.00006792204,0.000070184964],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007993882,0.00029270657,0.00041578684,0.0001781828,0.00010625276,0.000051594165,0.0002287307,0.00018108789,0.0187383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000032927112,0.00027709632,0.00026015355,0.000008669461,0.00052906707,0.0006277961,0.00008840122,0.00028354512,0.00043458212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002696223,0.00004754322,0.000009416632,0.00020215186,0.00019733053,0.0000050971994,0.010926423,1.26472e-7,0.000005674291,0.9749547,0.010966646,0.0026579008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017445961,0.00011067351,0.00000843673,0.00011117145,0.00008550242,6.804786e-7,0.0001172458,3.4884997e-7,0.000331271,0.54119945,0.4576819,0.0001788996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031614134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000064474716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44671524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015279908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010727253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W621402145","doi":"10.51644/dqpq7790","title":"Asking the Questions and the Importance of Saying No","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Consensus","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0442229947907461,"score_gpt":0.2602072199384394,"score_spread":0.21598422514769333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W621402145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5741143,0.0026937781,0.00007181447,0.012267148,0.0013562577,0.00025687384,0.000014619178,0.00005066428,0.40917453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597734,0.00003616077,0.000054669392,0.0009465878,0.00034179902,0.0000051276998,7.1893714e-7,0.000005644121,0.002631953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994777,0.00015670012,0.00014335845,0.000076555174,0.00005831464,0.00008741412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983779,0.0012040858,0.00009580604,0.00019544663,0.00011298815,0.000013762461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006773156,0.00005576175,0.000120076154,0.000010467701,0.00036761607,0.00003407151,0.00007713977,0.000018612456,0.000029636916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004375745,0.000028840534,0.000042168274,0.000010552851,0.0017701035,0.000013324024,0.000025544798,0.00013635933,0.000010067447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009098097,0.0000045258034,0.00068722834,0.00001748904,0.000017882927,4.4383816e-7,0.008253853,0.0000010399554,0.00002434687,0.989283,0.0010794582,0.000621631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010079971,0.0000526955,0.00224839,0.00008985442,0.00014019157,0.000019912302,0.0072223055,0.00087622355,0.000076557124,0.22238417,0.7656968,0.00018490574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001813342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000827361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7668988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000027129279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017912527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.652202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W623521812","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0074-1","title":"Dynamic Formal Epistemology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Collation; Epistemology; Key (lock); Social epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06282954175862769,"score_gpt":0.25395924484122695,"score_spread":0.19112970308259924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W623521812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021140886,0.00074235944,0.0001440433,0.00018745505,0.0038831504,0.00025176184,0.00009332,0.0002044425,0.9944723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010296906,0.00012840226,0.00015815994,0.0013474517,0.0010534504,0.00002082096,0.0002986572,0.00008447985,0.9958789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983806,0.00006738741,0.0004764142,0.0004007526,0.00016706277,0.0005077929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874103,0.00014582775,0.00028903774,0.0005246008,0.00020675155,0.00009273123],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032113513,0.00041157583,0.000681056,0.00015560762,0.00031540828,0.00005989823,0.00041187488,0.00058039516,0.011667728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015979045,0.00034490298,0.0003531079,0.0000065968998,0.0013374247,0.00019229013,0.00013949284,0.00086033845,0.0031285803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010235469,0.00002674514,7.649099e-7,0.00018116459,0.0001274752,0.000019102354,0.00638649,5.1647223e-8,4.4839837e-7,0.9079306,0.08383546,0.0014814617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012764713,0.000119860946,0.0000023415673,0.000037390284,0.00009995459,0.000013342549,0.00022356535,0.000006119445,0.0000014428161,0.26717955,0.73186946,0.00031931847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018382467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005577129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64803404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000961395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000339065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64399390","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/37uw9","title":"Winners and Losers in the Folk Epistemology of Lotteries","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Lottery; Odds; Contrast (vision); Epistemology; Statistical evidence; Ticket; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics; Advertising; Econometrics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Null hypothesis; Statistics; Logistic regression; Mathematics; Business","score_opus":0.08751766594496235,"score_gpt":0.25711767363959837,"score_spread":0.169600007694636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64399390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75686723,0.00034281056,0.000046099638,0.041579045,0.0002508811,0.0001715313,0.000011354816,0.0000273269,0.20070373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918793,0.000029719371,0.000050477545,0.006834271,0.00014195801,0.000003916222,0.0000027110427,0.000005419556,0.0010522192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943656,0.00010732469,0.00017089632,0.00011153762,0.000065286295,0.00010838437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999622,0.00018258166,0.0000501128,0.00009298407,0.000030112562,0.000022228562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019913311,0.000071494454,0.00017330356,0.00002210469,0.000058865968,0.000021985468,0.000115341136,0.000035643083,0.00016097867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004380283,0.000044906505,0.000035555287,0.000022854278,0.0008437321,0.000067602916,0.000027131082,0.00012244852,0.000009432655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001758556,0.000017118777,0.0014221148,0.00008650836,0.00001682545,0.000005565619,0.13027868,8.729925e-7,0.00008968544,0.865315,0.0024195174,0.00033052702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011869785,0.00087382266,0.004058433,0.000038278013,0.000082765415,0.000013740646,0.26387253,0.00009640319,0.00070697424,0.07960621,0.6490557,0.0004081001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003031133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012245537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7857088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002516471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014773038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3108766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W658619875","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511806544","title":"Fallacies and Argument Appraisal","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Dialectic; Epistemology; Identification (biology); Critical appraisal; Order (exchange); Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.04932347582373089,"score_gpt":0.23728999339342327,"score_spread":0.18796651756969238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W658619875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032392872,0.000478661,0.000076840515,0.000028199995,0.0011501872,0.0002668883,0.00027809243,0.00013477865,0.9972624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005716766,0.00014114604,0.00003526535,0.00017906388,0.0009235072,6.5271865e-7,0.000090319445,0.000038646504,0.9980197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987311,0.000067922636,0.0001901332,0.0004335443,0.00024378751,0.00033351654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988539,0.0002532536,0.00020196727,0.0003498605,0.00019103172,0.00014996619],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020852864,0.00035299425,0.00045714673,0.00016599393,0.00042390617,0.00011551991,0.00029977565,0.0003318871,0.0000102322765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013401321,0.0003875045,0.00017648899,0.000002980191,0.001732959,0.0000943461,0.00026851863,0.0006459543,0.00001750171],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034125795,0.000013150895,0.0000013132802,0.00020643751,0.00015328365,0.00009284082,0.0029268644,1.1738178e-7,0.0000030541423,0.8391211,0.15695906,0.0004886737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038362478,0.00006720642,0.0000057551033,0.000096376265,0.0002567678,0.0000068240925,0.0010854716,0.000003383915,0.000032521035,0.00008667529,0.9975641,0.0004113108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029661428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008962589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.840605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120674405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015725185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6906479353","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/chkr7","title":"Bias Justification Project","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open Science Framework","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Set (abstract data type); Focus (optics); Perspective (graphical); Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.3093541618077442,"score_gpt":0.41854694236490514,"score_spread":0.10919278055716092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6906479353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013435142,0.00027415765,0.00016733364,0.00086694094,0.0051305387,0.000754379,0.00006135707,0.000090952795,0.9926409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012662676,0.00014444141,0.003219709,0.0004977364,0.002336153,0.00007081801,0.000018822318,0.0001266542,0.9923194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998301,0.000066439556,0.00017121126,0.0006598568,0.00044044782,0.000360993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740463,0.00010863652,0.00055149983,0.001696171,0.0001641588,0.000074882046],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015133708,0.00022322133,0.00035234186,0.00023159129,0.0012904058,0.0026623623,0.004254027,0.00028709727,0.0025905645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010393264,0.00017886166,0.000069345246,0.00009057953,0.0044560833,0.00043165695,0.0005190557,0.0005966347,0.0009742219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017908632,0.000024747915,0.000009740518,0.000033806416,0.000009837153,0.0000015627754,0.0053716153,5.6172283e-8,0.0000030247202,0.5578342,0.42979833,0.0069112564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044904682,0.00002708356,0.0000109413795,0.00056650286,0.000028395625,7.572252e-7,0.00081808906,0.0000038800854,0.000014856897,0.025117693,0.9731102,0.00025672253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033213377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026546393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54331183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040573213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075875793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017828681","doi":"","title":"Coherence and Incoherence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Bielefeld; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; Linköpings Universitet; Stockholms Universitet; York University; Uppsala Universitet; Vetenskapsrådet; Universität zu Köln; New York University Abu Dhabi; University of Missouri","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Coherence theory; Phase difference; Spatial coherence; Significant difference","score_opus":0.036453717356320095,"score_gpt":0.2738567058224379,"score_spread":0.2374029884661178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017828681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11414075,0.0007243378,0.00008709329,0.012487244,0.0023172505,0.0005474908,0.000017798491,0.00029609093,0.86938196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679288,0.00015861914,0.000249174,0.0047220117,0.0004379661,0.00007569235,0.000051491115,0.00002385862,0.02635234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983796,0.00011498219,0.000390812,0.0005156555,0.00023998815,0.00035897174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873894,0.00035007478,0.0001424281,0.0003848118,0.00028288443,0.00010083429],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036714197,0.00028878855,0.0003391644,0.00016959728,0.0009303073,0.00038435202,0.0003068881,0.00011452756,0.001642793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021161982,0.00027281998,0.00008547022,0.00013465517,0.0015736159,0.000589138,0.00010241818,0.00036509015,0.00029393315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029254441,0.00006979116,0.0012294485,0.00011320798,0.00012603955,0.0000031953468,0.008943364,0.000003014071,0.0009483629,0.94597507,0.0012436718,0.041315563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009873265,0.000119980716,0.0033934582,0.00015564778,0.00016989115,0.0000061551955,0.005253224,0.000051371146,0.0003666124,0.12104781,0.86784506,0.00060343917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030675193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014885725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8666014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007304083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017021231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017881168","doi":"","title":"Brandomâs Account of Defeasible Reasoning: Problems and Solutions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Defeasible estate; Entitlement (fair division); Inference; Defeasible reasoning; Relation (database); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.017299345663754934,"score_gpt":0.17494052190589177,"score_spread":0.15764117624213683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017881168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13395016,0.0068982765,0.000004848165,0.00076752715,0.0008401714,0.00034005175,0.00055372884,0.000012381806,0.8566329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94603926,0.00066916476,0.00010614761,0.00026721312,0.00020453913,0.000010284222,0.00013705002,0.000026784333,0.05253955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982483,0.00006249882,0.00036054399,0.00020342277,0.00083418627,0.0002910963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907106,0.00021712079,0.00038648408,0.00016598759,0.0000029708547,0.00015635855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000027707383,0.00022879255,0.00043670041,0.0000334791,0.00031206547,0.000031592896,0.00014445491,0.0000624704,0.000060496368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000060397897,0.00021379591,0.000050003917,0.000020391795,0.00020574765,0.00032918472,0.000040603627,0.00024076927,2.6099527e-9],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028621778,0.00004889343,0.0012949677,0.001247065,0.00017480961,0.0000038204676,0.006511517,0.000004160165,0.001753995,0.9845829,0.00092124095,0.0031704055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003117941,0.0005479582,0.08894975,0.0033838754,0.0011685698,0.000016744838,0.13059312,0.00032931444,0.029241582,0.07280512,0.66759986,0.0022461833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010277057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35242477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9117778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004325285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010872327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019484727","doi":"","title":"House Speaker Says President's Tweet About Mika Brzezinski Not Appropriate : CSPAN : June 29, 2017 7:39pm-8:03pm EDT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Internet Archive (Internet Archive)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Homeland security; Homeland; Immigration detention; House of Representatives","score_opus":0.044239314518637,"score_gpt":0.2677351953838917,"score_spread":0.22349588086525468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019484727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006211118,0.0014288165,0.0017968297,0.0005142895,0.009951361,0.0017622344,0.0032329988,0.0011186893,0.97957367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015895551,0.0011541091,0.0008216111,0.0008899219,0.009068903,0.0002094531,0.0010530796,0.0016972616,0.9692101],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923495,0.0009706353,0.001415566,0.0023709545,0.0010757374,0.0018176172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99318546,0.000697853,0.0022268477,0.0030359973,0.00017799498,0.00067584676],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007443024,0.002005467,0.002376733,0.0010518242,0.0003751024,0.0013468103,0.0041787126,0.0006022749,0.011576418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029279426,0.0018200979,0.0014596223,0.000036984537,0.0045664073,0.00039922976,0.001995714,0.0029766504,0.009105303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042240196,0.00036238017,0.00012331747,0.0007216188,0.001697491,0.000388351,0.03978641,0.0000024914843,0.00011956844,0.05862909,0.8967917,0.00095516944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016407421,0.00041748668,0.0003171293,0.0031838736,0.00054770237,0.00006447036,0.00035564418,0.00018163162,0.00028372512,0.012763528,0.9783009,0.0019431271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064348154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3594252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29507703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102718666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030322743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027331226","doi":"","title":"Comments on Derek Allenâs âEthical argumentation, objectivity, and biasâ","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Subject (documents); Context (archaeology); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.06976383971585301,"score_gpt":0.25162284222959974,"score_spread":0.18185900251374673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027331226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9717992,0.000066333254,0.00006035694,0.009362015,0.0003519852,0.00019530994,0.00009691073,0.00006451558,0.018003402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98460734,0.000086315486,0.0001430355,0.00085098506,0.0001418586,5.8830926e-7,0.000014588292,0.000020768135,0.014134543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834126,0.00035714573,0.0001793562,0.0004177955,0.00038657055,0.0003178496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985227,0.0005638612,0.00020104414,0.00033236388,0.00020918032,0.00017086364],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007160796,0.00021268836,0.00032950664,0.00018480651,0.000863458,0.000052209394,0.00031057873,0.00020931783,0.0010836906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013199728,0.0001940427,0.00014351189,0.000054468273,0.0011797055,0.0006661698,0.00020700532,0.0004273462,0.00023923465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016103844,0.0016623556,0.2661541,0.00044029247,0.0011331671,0.00014213337,0.131284,0.0000031696445,0.011745286,0.55480355,0.011607885,0.019413628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013800307,0.002243219,0.5225768,0.0010017076,0.00061759196,0.00003636326,0.032313254,0.000014182161,0.007886281,0.11112735,0.30637464,0.002008331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016292812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021853694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44367623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009336806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052042687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7040713462","doi":"","title":"Belief in context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Northwestern University","keywords":"Assertion; Context (archaeology); Salient; Relevance (law); Semantics (computer science); Belief revision","score_opus":0.04298620803928681,"score_gpt":0.18336911460911146,"score_spread":0.14038290656982466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7040713462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8721332,0.00017486345,0.00001777324,0.000047317044,0.00028406925,0.0001029681,0.00006750437,0.000036189515,0.1271361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913053,0.0000652872,0.00007611797,0.00013616878,0.00005317107,2.7838007e-7,0.000007001018,0.0000085729835,0.00834812],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993563,0.00005416833,0.00010584531,0.00020236145,0.000101124475,0.00018018251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952525,0.000033704244,0.00008382852,0.00016792613,0.00013511833,0.00005414678],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017341733,0.000031682255,0.0002185524,0.00003748245,0.00017576676,0.000038392394,0.00022041914,0.00007353125,0.0010735951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014633758,0.00011699528,0.00009277798,0.00004118707,0.00078900385,0.00025138393,0.000058081525,0.0001623107,0.0000721494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003940324,0.00090837094,0.031521715,0.00025372807,0.00013413293,0.00053237437,0.16837403,4.1875333e-7,0.000051222163,0.012872205,0.012945813,0.7723666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092846825,0.00012096554,0.923713,0.00012207447,0.000030989155,0.000009926628,0.044821866,0.000007871641,0.000001044862,0.010004126,0.020028489,0.00021116012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40435442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9465367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8921913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002327299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042071195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043832388","doi":"","title":"On Understanding âProbablyâ and Other Modal Qualifiers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Utterance; Modal; Semantics (computer science); Speech act; Meaning (existential)","score_opus":0.1285611422431374,"score_gpt":0.26606068766137725,"score_spread":0.13749954541823986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043832388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8789575,0.00009256971,0.0005277957,0.0005783627,0.00037819796,0.00015839285,0.000052594754,0.00006785362,0.11918672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890842,0.0000105486115,0.0001914087,0.0005957355,0.00015468591,1.1251809e-7,0.000008112688,0.000025357227,0.009929831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985772,0.00013470161,0.00018386867,0.00036455144,0.00034114442,0.00039856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989135,0.00033294375,0.0001927238,0.00028990285,0.00009159385,0.00017931536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013277411,0.00020527569,0.00030842214,0.00026569926,0.0009453993,0.00005516647,0.00027283208,0.00020565074,0.00046042242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066061235,0.00023259438,0.00014997734,0.00008254069,0.0011344692,0.00040178333,0.00010640847,0.0004996443,0.00007038129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000400748,0.000098448094,0.0091935685,0.000083494684,0.0001320446,0.000029466555,0.046938825,0.000006855396,0.0005678449,0.94172317,0.0005580453,0.00026748783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007702389,0.0014718727,0.029635666,0.00058754336,0.000542849,0.00003527423,0.2974343,0.0000663332,0.0018316042,0.47241923,0.18607439,0.0021985325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027236645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053130756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46930394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016431285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040713217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94849235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7083448813","doi":"10.7202/1120415ar","title":"Thomas W. Simpson, 'Trust: A Philosophical Study'","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.1136723382969731,"score_gpt":0.35064095020462926,"score_spread":0.23696861190765617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7083448813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037105777,0.142811,0.000008601779,0.083524756,0.0014813946,0.0019013039,0.000025037536,0.00015845736,0.7663789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95560235,0.018050354,0.00003713478,0.02113347,0.0015256704,0.0002781279,0.000017275923,0.00003478793,0.0033208493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977808,0.00040892218,0.0007552639,0.00046991298,0.0002611493,0.0003239547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987334,0.0002402961,0.00014938126,0.0006389273,0.00016758768,0.000070390466],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009832607,0.00029846677,0.0008473858,0.00016918569,0.00021733799,0.000060546394,0.0004366086,0.00008785743,0.0003724113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028245055,0.00024836964,0.00025205698,0.00021154329,0.00041328603,0.00015699501,0.0001263455,0.00063433044,0.00021984606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001151027,0.00058214605,0.0012356798,0.0029571194,0.000076935714,0.00003133358,0.0019423263,4.6645667e-7,8.06238e-7,0.9880366,0.0028851954,0.0022399249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004514527,0.00012063705,0.00022888208,0.0027974253,0.00017364942,0.0000017249395,0.00018643063,0.000004964758,0.0000013015572,0.55149746,0.4442963,0.00023977758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052034058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018362085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9518918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049274524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086516164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095708478","doi":"","title":"Categorization Criteria","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Prioritization; Process (computing); Risk assessment; Human health; Risk management","score_opus":0.06467501772958623,"score_gpt":0.2680717355651352,"score_spread":0.20339671783554897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095708478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045123905,0.00003839296,0.00073514663,0.0021607957,0.0013062519,0.00012464957,0.00000240879,0.000117556905,0.9503909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8920047,0.00000577719,0.00013089321,0.0013094255,0.0006088764,0.0000141706305,0.000014460218,0.0000072478433,0.105904445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996569,0.000023227398,0.00009315147,0.00007972065,0.000049488757,0.00009746693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997053,0.000025596453,0.000023035016,0.00009678348,0.00012303199,0.00002626524],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000571477,0.000051833576,0.000068036265,0.000021305965,0.00011852682,0.000120966135,0.000053991713,0.0000268688,0.015304401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012815661,0.00003956682,0.0000264058,0.000008359822,0.00012370045,0.0002208407,0.000011379772,0.000053280706,0.0016783632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.820559e-7,0.000014798403,0.00004450787,0.000009672275,0.000005991843,1.6357833e-7,0.008430612,1.3490987e-7,0.00036190584,0.95916826,0.031074155,0.0008894052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014589603,0.000050011517,0.0006579035,0.0000045933325,0.00001361665,8.396219e-7,0.0048033255,0.00021995121,0.00069956813,0.23232241,0.7609055,0.00017640574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010998147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031048307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8468808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000048827496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009195586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097113805","doi":"","title":"The Role of Academic Confidence and Epistemological Beliefs on Syllogistic Reasoning Performance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Syllogism; SOCRATES; Premise; Set (abstract data type); Deductive reasoning; Defeasible reasoning; Analytic reasoning","score_opus":0.0392687097162052,"score_gpt":0.25316752131765186,"score_spread":0.21389881160144666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097113805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76735985,0.0026956697,0.000028074852,0.0010183913,0.00036267794,0.0002694462,0.0000039503993,0.00005850856,0.22820345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99038726,0.0007399679,0.000045449833,0.00042607385,0.0002220834,0.00002319586,0.0000016507676,0.0000067437613,0.008147576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916565,0.000082176775,0.00024611154,0.00016144979,0.00013451849,0.00021008383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987811,0.00075573963,0.000117653646,0.00018009078,0.00011762646,0.00004780437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004119041,0.00010923981,0.00017655821,0.000020255136,0.00042278977,0.00005678404,0.00018400821,0.00008882199,0.0002147181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020141699,0.000060912564,0.00003647997,0.000014651047,0.0014361072,0.00010916828,0.000052022377,0.0003867863,0.00014211965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007234235,0.00001040036,0.0018175383,0.00002042697,0.00001334447,2.6777565e-7,0.0031974178,0.000002183417,0.00014158094,0.9902148,0.0002912733,0.0042835134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078692986,0.001912288,0.04607252,0.0005560489,0.00012005618,0.000029633358,0.02723406,0.0042731306,0.00360058,0.6228551,0.29166237,0.00089729874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030297015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053958716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36735973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008229989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019692277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5291397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106125003","doi":"10.5840/dap2008/2009242","title":"Preface","year":2008,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Directory of American Philosophers","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; State (computer science); Rank (graph theory); Period (music)","score_opus":0.10240685289917349,"score_gpt":0.2980306949928888,"score_spread":0.1956238420937153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106125003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57349014,0.0062803933,0.00001448533,0.0014846822,0.0023604129,0.00037666364,0.00019081058,0.00014376684,0.41565865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850507,0.0023400583,0.00022515307,0.0010638197,0.0017473549,0.000016278997,0.000016221697,0.00009562858,0.009444786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968145,0.00043466687,0.00084804755,0.0006741184,0.00059144327,0.0006372103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970766,0.000432299,0.0010284852,0.00078089826,0.00039774302,0.00028398857],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031634467,0.0005515854,0.0012770433,0.00019459757,0.00071230554,0.000030524418,0.00051640905,0.0001221223,0.0013621054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001259701,0.000575258,0.0006028324,0.00022576541,0.015663352,0.00025953376,0.000095768846,0.000640694,0.00019113647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011154228,0.0038016108,0.017862959,0.001570287,0.0039819106,0.0002653566,0.34639028,0.00021394782,0.0045140036,0.5526886,0.041615486,0.02598012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001780598,0.0025231696,0.009081321,0.00039089468,0.0007456383,0.000041705345,0.018656962,0.00007181234,0.0037476318,0.018539637,0.9419885,0.0024320988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019159741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008646219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90037304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009253189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036149807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116762133","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i4.9435","title":"Two-Tier Fallacy Theory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Uniwersytet Łódzki","keywords":"Fallacy; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Conflation; Categorization; Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.04602294356571903,"score_gpt":0.2884172560950775,"score_spread":0.24239431252935847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116762133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016277295,0.00037938863,0.0003020117,0.00050011993,0.0014682182,0.000106929634,0.0000104240335,0.000110899826,0.98084474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.857241,0.000024340461,0.000106620515,0.009699065,0.00043154077,0.000014495406,0.000015275975,0.0000063495168,0.13246131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992929,0.00004670083,0.00022598659,0.00010257491,0.0000914364,0.00024041986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994552,0.00015169842,0.000061125655,0.0002031538,0.00009633925,0.000032490854],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038999063,0.00011871172,0.00016392313,0.000081095575,0.00027956456,0.00009985645,0.00019599697,0.00006239786,0.00091717107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061409424,0.00008984776,0.000101393256,0.000028360248,0.0004355035,0.00027042354,0.000076458,0.00024562664,0.00045955027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022308925,0.000020086238,0.00014322987,0.00003452981,0.000034759887,0.0000023791633,0.008495309,0.000008629908,0.000005306048,0.983201,0.0023593248,0.0056731063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002697866,0.000044667275,0.00024128644,0.000014791986,0.000023117062,9.500957e-7,0.002818088,0.000018338915,0.00005457639,0.30344227,0.69296014,0.000111992646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000077016215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022106216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8483834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013242318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006376597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117117968","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2024.4.16686","title":"What’s in a Perspective?","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Extant taxon; Cognition; Point (geometry); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.056852493660318526,"score_gpt":0.3083139244406533,"score_spread":0.2514614307803348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117117968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017740533,0.08516488,0.00002416054,0.04744508,0.041986886,0.0011337788,0.00045708576,0.00046369052,0.8055839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96933633,0.00084051787,0.000026529322,0.0015141065,0.010278972,0.00009920686,0.000032053504,0.00014749837,0.017724803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953474,0.0004182571,0.0011821372,0.0014786818,0.000574427,0.0009991247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977951,0.0005965218,0.0001950382,0.0008734191,0.0002674702,0.0002724723],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008805853,0.00082807004,0.0009806892,0.0006705942,0.00055836403,0.0036746378,0.0006219606,0.0005006741,0.0013942162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003473646,0.00084878417,0.00071755855,0.0003363869,0.002225015,0.0017219,0.000054250086,0.00194905,0.002625639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006326914,0.00036641394,0.000015248854,0.0008549303,0.00019230915,0.00046149295,0.33527413,4.4222102e-7,0.000013239326,0.6582534,0.001469497,0.00303564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049397704,0.0018106522,0.000037801412,0.0024999345,0.0001685968,0.000033989243,0.13593669,0.00015104168,0.0000088604265,0.62802714,0.2300625,0.00076884177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005215641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090358703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9515958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040387374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052319677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118551792","doi":"10.1353/rss.2025.a979300","title":"A Neo-Russellian Defence of Knowledge as Justified True Belief","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Conjunction (astronomy); Outcome (game theory); Carry (investment); Belief revision; False accusation","score_opus":0.06560876058177574,"score_gpt":0.3245159361542743,"score_spread":0.2589071755724986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118551792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4964729,0.1931309,0.000432405,0.009752336,0.008658836,0.00081310445,0.000046714194,0.00007760269,0.29061523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94719875,0.026152251,0.00012003378,0.00053548743,0.000799707,0.0000056078584,0.0000014521918,0.000028401875,0.025158336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997355,0.00042678177,0.0012326895,0.00021624648,0.00035510943,0.00041421622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957654,0.0019531718,0.00079391425,0.00040165227,0.0009945128,0.00009133874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019995905,0.0003684898,0.0010755118,0.00025465732,0.0008425129,0.000058631955,0.00069398567,0.000131139,0.0001226208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026879815,0.00021683278,0.0004744733,0.00022032492,0.0017969793,0.00020685223,0.00010002694,0.0007323142,0.00005211243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011478624,0.0011097438,0.0002781867,0.0019578424,0.004576778,0.000035729106,0.36106485,0.0001568035,0.003738941,0.5783717,0.041623596,0.005937933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035545938,0.0013871497,0.00049751456,0.0021563738,0.004315895,0.00010532095,0.09473478,0.00004477888,0.022179496,0.14825292,0.72197706,0.0007940933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016162335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009190521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68035346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048504364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002623383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8842184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7129048751","doi":"10.1111/phis.70014","title":"Pluralist Pragmatism and Rationality","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Issues","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Rationality; Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Pluralism (philosophy); Great Rationality Debate","score_opus":0.06784665982479686,"score_gpt":0.3316994581708203,"score_spread":0.26385279834602343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7129048751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03657653,0.0055372138,0.00009219786,0.44037738,0.0011661812,0.00028676697,0.00007433051,0.00019907401,0.5156903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98489153,0.00012773446,0.00013200301,0.0035693252,0.0009063431,0.00001577432,0.000028965793,0.000006693883,0.0103216395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927574,0.00009032921,0.00019875285,0.00019453418,0.00011781635,0.00012280801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945354,0.00019123132,0.000041879106,0.00015569825,0.00011470339,0.00004292358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021578737,0.000107538486,0.00019901895,0.000040810297,0.00028614042,0.000114956245,0.00009194288,0.000068379326,0.00032496935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013598238,0.00009014633,0.000046619247,0.000023988672,0.00076986995,0.0001401231,0.00005308683,0.0001993051,0.000040698767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073511983,0.00004194594,0.00018828368,0.00007266734,0.000033147346,0.0000018422471,0.003671233,2.2692117e-7,0.000020776659,0.99368227,0.0018598195,0.0004204209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011343993,0.00001514103,0.00048786905,0.000025322222,0.000020268277,4.618195e-7,0.0001394756,0.000023569495,0.000042788226,0.6965993,0.30246127,0.00007111662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026602246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021846736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94831496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009711147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020786345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36760604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132925719","doi":"","title":"Inquiry and its Norms","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Curiosity; Argument (complex analysis); Doxastic logic; Skepticism; Verisimilitude; Counterintuitive; Philosophy of science","score_opus":0.15438390785815193,"score_gpt":0.39021117923294985,"score_spread":0.23582727137479792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132925719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8848815,0.008963829,0.000004522185,0.001224251,0.0146722365,0.0006072433,0.000044634035,0.00022329776,0.089378506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3417539,0.0054712486,0.000010098748,0.0003212057,0.0032896465,0.000051078463,0.0005578754,0.00013987217,0.6484051],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977828,0.00014388161,0.00048782642,0.00067861116,0.00035556348,0.0005513078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982285,0.0003952021,0.0004180249,0.00035972384,0.0004200031,0.00017855654],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004968602,0.0005568138,0.0007572154,0.00022679973,0.0009637798,0.00031755317,0.00024805093,0.0006331982,0.00081976375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018843528,0.0005337899,0.00021841338,0.00009385467,0.0005107941,0.00018799712,0.00008259908,0.0010608677,0.0015000972],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006491574,0.000066128334,0.000029841054,0.0018423892,0.00024208547,0.000027917535,0.745605,0.0000025429597,0.00022973819,0.24584994,0.0045682066,0.001471297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007730085,0.0004108527,0.001971795,0.00088627404,0.0006549207,0.0000065118184,0.7306353,0.00014037627,0.0007442751,0.0124235675,0.24997202,0.0013811158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008352138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045069535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55902654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003491326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018827604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132952533","doi":"","title":"The Cognitive Conception of Intentional Action","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Cognition; Conflation; Eliminative materialism; Rational analysis; Causation; Identity (music); Philosophy of mind; Argument (complex analysis)","score_opus":0.10671480604127426,"score_gpt":0.4049746432772674,"score_spread":0.29825983723599314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132952533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65111136,0.017164322,0.00031941876,0.0021738785,0.032049146,0.0013273582,0.0002452323,0.00012061885,0.29548863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70729077,0.0023852708,0.000004946686,0.000055091485,0.0015529004,0.000053624663,0.0007981701,0.000040259056,0.287819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980528,0.0002633248,0.00057316455,0.00039363487,0.0004396616,0.00027742484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968999,0.00085376,0.000665161,0.00019431394,0.0013343225,0.00005253499],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059951266,0.00034148892,0.00041169368,0.000118227465,0.00092361984,0.00025784457,0.00017527773,0.00035850366,0.0011115093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021589975,0.00026276227,0.0004534565,0.00007808455,0.0014179149,0.00014729101,0.000034188524,0.0010518215,0.00044475275],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040030436,0.000115774645,0.00001172928,0.001200703,0.0007610288,0.0000027260357,0.28564626,0.0000023563423,0.0010419935,0.69605595,0.0029348992,0.011826262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004009656,0.00036183407,0.00042989838,0.0017015436,0.0012153939,0.000003240755,0.8274138,0.00016143781,0.0023535942,0.030356495,0.13520978,0.00039199562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006627171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041492037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6656995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006725518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002828525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7138826711","doi":"","title":"The true, the good and the justified: Essays on epistemic normativity and value","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Wishful thinking; Teleology; Commit; Philosophy of science; Falsity; Natural (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis)","score_opus":0.01929695107059497,"score_gpt":0.2571992966110584,"score_spread":0.2379023455404634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7138826711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37972853,0.06466203,0.00028167976,0.2677257,0.020719744,0.0085648205,0.001870607,0.00070451136,0.2557424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525844,0.019179765,0.00012916025,0.00084004673,0.00044055766,0.000491556,0.0001547571,0.000085364096,0.02609438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948132,0.0007511544,0.0015607738,0.0011471306,0.00076786056,0.00095989567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922999,0.0026204775,0.0019556934,0.0023796493,0.0006375767,0.00010667685],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030368727,0.0012377594,0.0017839632,0.00063891814,0.006580819,0.00059402303,0.0020542685,0.00180807,0.000015740536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019107047,0.0006687069,0.0005230746,0.0005534524,0.017608784,0.00040706436,0.0005854442,0.0043848106,0.00001705118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048190134,0.00015835516,0.00018690524,0.0011473044,0.0012171173,0.000009948818,0.013094919,0.000028408944,0.000052490777,0.94929343,0.0016816607,0.032647584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004156068,0.0005184886,0.00071723154,0.0022011464,0.0029012111,0.000043761655,0.037314683,0.0005738058,0.0009546045,0.23492496,0.71449196,0.0012020951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007300014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007857797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71436846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012339187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005755616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139574039","doi":"","title":"Commentary on âLevels of Depth in Deep Disagreementâ","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Feature (linguistics); Margin (machine learning); Focus (optics); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.05607707101966159,"score_gpt":0.24984480043567567,"score_spread":0.19376772941601408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139574039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9668365,0.00048958365,0.00010825643,0.010115023,0.0009432089,0.0005740513,0.00058808894,0.000032207343,0.020313064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98832196,0.00047352814,0.00015551696,0.0011397891,0.0002775906,8.014483e-7,0.000054550135,0.00004976802,0.009526495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957726,0.0009320341,0.00075901573,0.0008386153,0.00085612823,0.0008416119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965152,0.0009082288,0.000908625,0.0010117398,0.00035861164,0.00029759103],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016161837,0.00056451664,0.0011318277,0.0006697411,0.00076700497,0.000040006023,0.0012027945,0.0005153745,0.003869894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014208152,0.00055869366,0.0006194278,0.0002547295,0.0028427595,0.0011959453,0.0005931353,0.00089318416,0.0002902206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005219239,0.0051735537,0.67819357,0.00170195,0.001944896,0.00030646625,0.13656633,0.0000361458,0.016076472,0.11743188,0.0043691834,0.032980327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021943664,0.0043185917,0.6917301,0.0054654325,0.0013166786,0.000011371403,0.058370855,0.000039751812,0.011405629,0.021740606,0.1807708,0.0028865077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008704632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017679317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17640163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041451174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014236679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7159893944","doi":"","title":"What Could Go Wrong?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Counterintuitive; Nothing; Plural; Politics; Perspective (graphical); Romance; Undoing; Multitude","score_opus":0.15789751790826803,"score_gpt":0.3848963618884558,"score_spread":0.22699884398018774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7159893944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006271591,0.016639331,0.000019516994,0.00501786,0.0028355883,0.002259605,0.0011291611,0.00035080634,0.97112095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01297497,0.011241312,0.00020821024,0.00020389896,0.00075236714,0.0007867958,0.00057574885,0.00009816147,0.97315854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940158,0.000058704507,0.0006475574,0.0014028278,0.0026348769,0.001240243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529964,0.0007691577,0.00036479597,0.000513003,0.0028630951,0.00019031283],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072556087,0.0004562067,0.00057591556,0.0040624333,0.003987901,0.0005991388,0.0014197673,0.00056620385,0.0010512937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001184492,0.0004301582,0.00017517847,0.0005199315,0.010887089,0.0012353872,0.0008059299,0.0023545616,0.00006469967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027343767,0.0000816042,0.000015668447,0.00012971643,0.00008700434,0.000014974601,0.0011791216,1.2776235e-7,0.00012473406,0.9450568,0.03915311,0.014129773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019750578,0.0005338436,0.0000021826986,0.00008030478,0.00001831484,0.000017689947,0.0009396147,0.00003765163,0.00005907187,0.39617518,0.6016378,0.00030088663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000077199154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018055976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5624847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005633856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026574621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7160057930","doi":"10.5840/idpp2003/2004132","title":"Preface","year":2003,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Directory of Philosophy and Philosophers","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Latin Americans; Period (music); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.08154009085969305,"score_gpt":0.29949724399619815,"score_spread":0.2179571531365051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7160057930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044993833,0.011466371,0.000024893645,0.004636431,0.008028112,0.00035584086,0.00043514918,0.00006053854,0.9299988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900444,0.0015537739,0.00016531028,0.0008613162,0.0023011544,0.00001750906,0.000030268002,0.00005998579,0.004966238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704707,0.00039300282,0.00087582844,0.00067345565,0.0006373977,0.00037324196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977909,0.00046888352,0.0005801463,0.0003979197,0.00053286616,0.00022929758],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006245137,0.0005188713,0.0006723946,0.00025973914,0.00039141913,0.00012307582,0.00043900864,0.00026478193,0.0029036768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026996108,0.0005399152,0.00039632892,0.00008174727,0.002359003,0.00047600488,0.00008293846,0.000587077,0.000075072756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013397433,0.00043017694,0.00096202694,0.00033055132,0.0008267877,0.00001184076,0.0074680373,0.000019831543,0.00040335814,0.9880808,0.00064820924,0.0006844333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009673538,0.00022448479,0.00028682218,0.00031448374,0.0001881559,0.000012041697,0.00052324723,0.000029608402,0.00093000237,0.7099528,0.28603515,0.00053587597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010596663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023051101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9450506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007056309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014197729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7160077894","doi":"10.5840/idpp2005/2006142","title":"Preface","year":2005,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Directory of Philosophy and Philosophers","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Latin Americans; Period (music); Information system","score_opus":0.07444456918034942,"score_gpt":0.305219929566386,"score_spread":0.23077536038603658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7160077894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07047635,0.014273458,0.000019894016,0.030155214,0.0057126516,0.00039966777,0.000703133,0.00009422907,0.8781654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807643,0.0018261195,0.00024337036,0.0016175568,0.009709592,0.000016678827,0.00004766946,0.00005932001,0.0057153823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971619,0.00020307399,0.0009370202,0.00066053536,0.0006693294,0.0003681409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788266,0.0003894222,0.00059647154,0.00038740542,0.00051506626,0.0002289511],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046727696,0.0005140296,0.00065723126,0.0002761695,0.00036752882,0.00012762593,0.0005718563,0.00026275305,0.002860762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010923313,0.0005348508,0.00040099386,0.000067690875,0.0023114325,0.0007030904,0.00016378272,0.0006089961,0.00014293907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002524972,0.0005466313,0.00053167064,0.00029270136,0.0008850931,0.0000070805977,0.011929246,0.000075029224,0.0004913051,0.9765397,0.0014218597,0.007027187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013236662,0.0002758116,0.0005971353,0.0004638507,0.00025311895,0.000011609198,0.00042713163,0.00031835612,0.0009199423,0.44997197,0.54471326,0.00072416186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013106684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000062009225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.910288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009691258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010371487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164567720","doi":"10.1515/9780820372273-023","title":"Depraved indifference","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Semiotics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.10785407016030275,"score_gpt":0.26249738771798686,"score_spread":0.15464331755768412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164567720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00070491474,0.0023437738,0.0004256361,0.0034509134,0.006558686,0.00071662746,0.00069199456,0.00020421563,0.9849032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36614326,0.006574596,0.00061850395,0.008418551,0.009575255,0.000008018105,0.00040000584,0.0003893526,0.6078725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960331,0.00013928773,0.0012607663,0.0011206552,0.000698011,0.0007482364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962969,0.00072064204,0.0009457683,0.0010293674,0.00053102843,0.00047631044],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037545647,0.0011514312,0.0016362581,0.00016448334,0.00093307527,0.00040511964,0.0008886071,0.0012793518,0.003920111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024885766,0.0011634608,0.00072553824,0.000027712093,0.0025714445,0.00014492965,0.0004328554,0.0032958763,0.002946032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003722307,0.000057980043,0.00005410031,0.00067052396,0.0005100937,0.000113019654,0.024567364,0.0000019908855,0.00002922605,0.96983737,0.0021966752,0.0019244415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036751665,0.00033418482,0.00003559574,0.00049896387,0.000728362,0.0000108224585,0.001025053,0.00012061102,0.00008228333,0.3607123,0.63500124,0.0010830782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006523065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000306227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6328046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009915773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003717683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165919550","doi":"10.53437/ppa8e353","title":"Epistemic Indefinites: Are We Ignorant About Ignorance?","year":2013,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Existentialism; Doxastic logic; Identification (biology); Component (thermodynamics); Externalism","score_opus":0.08473799824798596,"score_gpt":0.26656997731541554,"score_spread":0.1818319790674296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165919550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10232281,0.04673741,0.0007016216,0.04070821,0.011424174,0.0028752545,0.0004744658,0.0006311059,0.79412496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84994537,0.00842391,0.00019714006,0.0053165765,0.0028603368,0.00021379259,0.000040704992,0.00013670303,0.13286549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944972,0.00051718234,0.0016586566,0.0011549931,0.00069082953,0.0014811484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99521583,0.0008970292,0.0009575739,0.0012933533,0.0011532758,0.0004829468],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007623504,0.001012841,0.001492452,0.0003068999,0.0015429171,0.0013417498,0.0008788077,0.0007273663,0.031463515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014369037,0.0008686965,0.0007289338,0.00018520455,0.00280787,0.0010532285,0.00023912924,0.0015984814,0.011464098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039147864,0.0006466673,0.0027816908,0.0015685589,0.00045808914,0.0000349802,0.04051484,0.00001573791,0.00014772809,0.8843258,0.059583914,0.009882854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018207898,0.00047767058,0.001746435,0.0016424817,0.00036034608,0.000024767292,0.07681814,0.00044163843,0.00025357676,0.2353679,0.6790913,0.0019549546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004371022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033565597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74762255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000123892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029937335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W768171620","doi":"10.5007/%x","title":"Anonymity and testimonial warrant","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Worry; Warrant; Reductionism; Anonymity; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Computer security; Business","score_opus":0.038871976899541826,"score_gpt":0.25168924097819023,"score_spread":0.2128172640786484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W768171620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43483216,0.0012880604,0.0024445856,0.06664212,0.0042795055,0.0010245452,0.0001862391,0.0010263732,0.48827642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953517,0.00009336689,0.0017730008,0.0005217099,0.0014313204,0.000075483826,0.00006484546,0.000041672774,0.0006469467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976674,0.00019553672,0.00050134445,0.0005983569,0.0004597584,0.00057760236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842465,0.00018616595,0.00023172218,0.00043082883,0.00037378323,0.00035285053],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005549653,0.00036913168,0.00042647758,0.00021549352,0.0011337815,0.00031551527,0.00035089286,0.00030932057,0.000049355596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039450015,0.00033622712,0.00016899622,0.00012642531,0.00012411788,0.0004673976,0.00014539475,0.0006618433,0.000024270737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007458392,0.00030420296,0.00015693456,0.00007506498,0.000081169565,0.00010087005,0.01062884,0.000023061604,0.0007228077,0.98665595,0.00034867524,0.00082784746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014045184,0.00011732408,0.0014893485,0.00009701965,0.00008338598,0.00046725315,0.0013667208,0.00004223994,0.0005394779,0.01583435,0.9780967,0.00046166082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000121742205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011773673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97774804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002536771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043775197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W808749601","doi":"","title":"Anticipating Objections as a Way of Coping With Dissensus","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Epistemology; Argumentation theory; Task (project management); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.04901128884923234,"score_gpt":0.25887892102703675,"score_spread":0.2098676321778044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W808749601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9237352,0.000083030915,0.00020741114,0.00033366124,0.0002459259,0.00016135309,0.000031340867,0.000057323035,0.075144775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920337,0.000009683879,0.000688213,0.00007705854,0.00013468832,1.874127e-7,0.000016494281,0.000021976079,0.007018005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986204,0.00010791045,0.00025040787,0.00029419907,0.0003561455,0.0003709274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844086,0.00029858993,0.00037509756,0.0003307513,0.00042514174,0.00012952976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008673545,0.00018336391,0.00038752877,0.00025653144,0.00087746925,0.000027013093,0.00028843145,0.00014172783,0.00048943463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008873296,0.00019519549,0.00017585122,0.00016817555,0.0010646101,0.00044801275,0.00010663713,0.0004646901,0.000047988746],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001906324,0.0009896606,0.2019128,0.0010865999,0.0011574713,0.000315101,0.3283816,0.00006964158,0.028434366,0.43195015,0.00049762416,0.003298674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008959323,0.0034159336,0.3966225,0.0017830853,0.0017450362,0.0001606824,0.44233814,0.000059044374,0.04126394,0.013851992,0.087169304,0.0026310117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096296996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009046167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41809815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059512786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008037412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7959841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W816523984","doi":"","title":"Virtuous agency as the ground for argument norms","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Agency (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Virtuous circle and vicious circle; Practical reason; Philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.04868161694541547,"score_gpt":0.23518089674726092,"score_spread":0.18649927980184544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W816523984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95780414,0.00021856019,0.00006937742,0.0042768233,0.0007530657,0.0007958123,0.00006375063,0.000067908186,0.035950582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9314467,0.000039544273,0.0001901702,0.0008392624,0.00034896238,0.000006026506,0.000047294274,0.000028024248,0.06705403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984366,0.00015962991,0.00022592905,0.00037524375,0.00036090444,0.00044166492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833345,0.00030264223,0.0002676232,0.00054222526,0.00040782397,0.00014620906],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006992278,0.00023912865,0.00034265747,0.00011816432,0.0016535365,0.0001348097,0.00065241876,0.00017530576,0.0031225425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090150104,0.00020558602,0.0003697629,0.00007471376,0.0009813866,0.0009223955,0.00020175858,0.00045511688,0.0009295096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045852573,0.0007950193,0.008083834,0.0004923374,0.0010356127,0.000048709357,0.25469932,0.000016440943,0.0062089236,0.7029185,0.014219981,0.011022776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033020554,0.0010839389,0.054708216,0.00012815058,0.0005555015,0.00002926815,0.05419211,0.00007245117,0.0011017297,0.20858337,0.6751279,0.0011153027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012927592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017555213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6609079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008933383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084815176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W829009663","doi":"","title":"Revision and Immortality in Philosophical Argumentation: Reconsidering the Rhetorical Wedge","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Immortality; Argument map; Linguistics; Theology","score_opus":0.2514490582201403,"score_gpt":0.3188525034603191,"score_spread":0.06740344524017883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W829009663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80803937,0.00052354817,0.000025481078,0.0073691686,0.0006332116,0.00020716943,0.0000038703442,0.000042985474,0.18315518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99687105,0.00024499997,0.000039182716,0.0018373141,0.00047706068,0.000007397819,0.0000063209795,0.0000039833603,0.0005126683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928474,0.000054828433,0.00028452105,0.00010528493,0.00010520971,0.00016538765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958664,0.00014455253,0.00006918171,0.00012237843,0.000040149367,0.000037098558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004678425,0.00009060884,0.00014241503,0.000033801334,0.00022574005,0.00008306166,0.00007928554,0.00006030304,0.00024503085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006838704,0.000058366913,0.000052896157,0.000031702446,0.00032692996,0.00030487252,0.000050229526,0.00028272092,0.000050244853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029773151,0.000030303858,0.005082991,0.000032387718,0.000012368071,0.000017321649,0.013631694,0.0000060249863,0.000004259003,0.9752134,0.00022415015,0.005715296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012718914,0.0003244107,0.022474876,0.000104569066,0.00005465746,0.00018483163,0.008330369,0.00038436556,0.000036330628,0.43592978,0.5303864,0.0005175217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058015386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025559275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5392837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015665148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016010094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2682916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W8712222","doi":"10.1016/s0272-6386(96)90130-4","title":"COMMON GROUND AND MODAL DISAGREEMENT","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Common ground; Modal; Common cause and special cause; Linguistics; Epistemology; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Statistics","score_opus":0.10461236430995692,"score_gpt":0.3057051897609112,"score_spread":0.2010928254509543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W8712222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69020545,0.0014207173,0.0008007009,0.025721122,0.0015970208,0.0003935157,0.000102819155,0.00016644583,0.27959222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941676,0.000028711514,0.00055052683,0.0021243675,0.0023794395,0.000006263283,0.000037782986,0.0000121462,0.00069313095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913675,0.00004133073,0.0002784525,0.00021129982,0.0001346276,0.00019752473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903274,0.00044017067,0.000066428205,0.00013872949,0.00009715131,0.0002248007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034562848,0.00013551481,0.00018473275,0.00005106963,0.0005734654,0.000095813586,0.00006502021,0.00008047486,0.0000508732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032740645,0.000120045006,0.000033598517,0.000028917006,0.0019127566,0.00005033032,0.000049206606,0.0002929779,0.000012011716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000700643,0.000040668878,0.0010971157,0.00004171784,0.000022007229,0.00000664061,0.009645165,6.098927e-7,0.000012664707,0.98869705,0.000053116248,0.0003762195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018690024,0.0000973491,0.0020916876,0.00003193369,0.000065009124,0.000005157424,0.00038023907,0.00015900293,0.000010636969,0.95276034,0.044058666,0.0001530851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023552393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007071096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30396217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011012281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020532034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7047632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W88368385","doi":"","title":"Lies and Misdemeanours","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Essays on Canadian writing","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.07567826423696451,"score_gpt":0.2276232283313177,"score_spread":0.1519449640943532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W88368385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13947256,0.0006728543,9.544851e-7,0.003984921,0.00035503772,0.00007513879,0.000052571635,0.000049923317,0.855336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98271996,0.000053351017,0.000037344606,0.0024930874,0.0008319706,0.000005147969,0.000005041431,0.000019238316,0.01383488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922395,0.00004243742,0.00013784676,0.00017838251,0.00008443977,0.00033296857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994331,0.00012226033,0.000040381812,0.00012700638,0.000056003602,0.0002212494],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017723402,0.000112777445,0.00013631288,0.000115601666,0.00059853157,0.00016046721,0.000082921615,0.000056301935,0.0010744854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006443367,0.00011452369,0.000048228292,0.000020333244,0.00028332183,0.000096476506,0.000008624378,0.00022876346,0.00014735265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012884169,0.0000140923175,0.0010390437,0.000031846783,0.000028030252,0.000038975875,0.021638257,0.00000222672,0.000005993174,0.9433669,0.021960944,0.011872442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046894426,0.00018406943,0.001149611,0.0001841738,0.00004011512,0.000017801096,0.018552551,0.0004824434,0.000028445053,0.0150117865,0.9632801,0.0005999518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04981599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42881766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94131917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049330076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036983507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W88740960","doi":"","title":"Higher Level Moral Principles in Argumentation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Reflective equilibrium; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Ideal (ethics); Function (biology); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16612955522986197,"score_gpt":0.267662331379803,"score_spread":0.10153277614994102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W88740960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94297385,0.00010652117,0.000015315822,0.0020819406,0.00035830893,0.00017572011,0.000050751743,0.000053941993,0.05418362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631829,0.000018573575,0.00050842954,0.000393927,0.00015869172,2.7098497e-7,0.000048341444,0.000011922976,0.03567689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867415,0.0001649041,0.00021797002,0.00032061897,0.00030629584,0.00031603914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991998,0.00006914877,0.00020369,0.0002859232,0.00014656837,0.000094883304],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005085527,0.00018103023,0.0003115635,0.00024767886,0.00040021172,0.00004636176,0.00036318772,0.00016104631,0.0012152275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029689698,0.00021590761,0.00015581174,0.00010711363,0.0003995912,0.00087053375,0.000075766664,0.00043271092,0.00015586278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005015586,0.00072656485,0.1360928,0.00013179614,0.00013357031,0.00010616328,0.08373116,0.000082900275,0.005174584,0.7682417,0.0009892161,0.004088004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022426285,0.00028201033,0.9092843,0.00010924222,0.000087264176,0.0000032012272,0.008140978,0.000019191411,0.0010461063,0.027169155,0.05114105,0.00047485926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027935853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003423712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7731915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011867624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057478712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89770856","doi":"","title":"Resolving Deep Disagreement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argumentation theory; Statement (logic); Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05055932912690555,"score_gpt":0.24168903376236137,"score_spread":0.1911297046354558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W89770856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9003742,0.00034975758,0.00041767966,0.00082672003,0.000719332,0.00019754171,0.000030515845,0.00009759962,0.09698667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97477204,0.000027609643,0.00076279347,0.00028026185,0.0003725893,1.8384122e-7,0.000030314932,0.000025285704,0.0237289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817115,0.0001370854,0.000269764,0.00040199218,0.00048641715,0.00053358084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985091,0.0002478991,0.00026994912,0.0004828194,0.00028071026,0.00020953489],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016333683,0.00022582272,0.0003561358,0.00024433516,0.001109324,0.000053268097,0.0005715265,0.00019073932,0.0023337055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009425981,0.0002643071,0.00027533495,0.00011145595,0.00094569,0.00067119685,0.00026388466,0.0005605374,0.0003525406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011783047,0.00093185814,0.14493726,0.0005642583,0.00080460054,0.00037785192,0.38511625,0.00002575132,0.009304118,0.43790942,0.0038347472,0.01501556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031712812,0.0005162421,0.17967156,0.000260526,0.00042850772,0.000018262994,0.085691996,0.000037818834,0.002949471,0.014948609,0.7110386,0.0012671367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003273345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01047902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70720387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013295206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049369388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W921136551","doi":"","title":"Commentary on: Suzanne McMurphy's \"Trust, distrust, and trustworthiness in argumentation: Virtues and fallacies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argumentation theory; Objectivity (philosophy); Distrust; Context (archaeology); Rationality; Sociology; Interpersonal communication; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.025931796916785096,"score_gpt":0.21916474619546883,"score_spread":0.19323294927868373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W921136551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849978,0.00046236222,0.000004596576,0.0080785025,0.00022281212,0.00030725342,0.00007211134,0.00004046887,0.0058140634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932535,0.00017945548,0.0001645202,0.0014697626,0.00015546338,0.000001966539,0.00005708428,0.000018433364,0.0046997787],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865204,0.00019160463,0.00021750116,0.0003887299,0.00025351712,0.00029662263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990921,0.00020477817,0.00016986499,0.00026339391,0.00012445165,0.00014542104],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038768598,0.00024343411,0.00039390274,0.00021497493,0.00062758464,0.00011518886,0.00024505396,0.000143,0.00085230975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028349878,0.00026659662,0.00008418553,0.00008582974,0.0012423202,0.0010921521,0.00019980826,0.0004546835,0.00005361388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047956707,0.00048515073,0.81965446,0.00046470136,0.0002947602,0.00007298876,0.09865978,0.000016084072,0.0006357539,0.064160906,0.0060961465,0.008979702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004490225,0.0006163524,0.8368384,0.00040790092,0.00018410211,0.000015460093,0.06814993,0.000096653705,0.0003542066,0.0281711,0.059717536,0.0009580994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012134451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040735095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05362139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006004686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020581847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W92744926","doi":"10.2307/jj.21995739.19","title":"Relativism, Coherence, and the Problems of Philosophy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Notre Dame Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Art history; SAINT; State (computer science); KISS (TNC); Pessimism; Performance art; Psychoanalysis; Classics; Epistemology; Art; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07359699502013638,"score_gpt":0.19774581906282962,"score_spread":0.12414882404269324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W92744926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020590075,0.00050479785,0.0000136595,0.00013362807,0.000121719444,0.00045002633,0.00017059736,0.000022642518,0.998377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0321667,0.00018047233,0.0000627309,0.00004748098,0.00011566187,5.819618e-7,0.000017306764,0.000019949714,0.9673891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992478,0.000057637826,0.00019909308,0.00021141226,0.00017512546,0.00010895092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863285,0.00025131862,0.0005019115,0.0003223317,0.0002527088,0.000038856786],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014016006,0.0002006978,0.00050645624,0.000059595543,0.00018225654,0.000018054963,0.00029545987,0.00020013977,0.00025818177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006762635,0.00016071941,0.00017387429,0.0000014652433,0.004415173,0.00006680994,0.00017698873,0.00041842696,0.00001085757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005101288,0.000009850959,0.0000015425383,0.00032657347,0.00022397464,0.0000023338514,0.030634416,0.0000010198916,0.00000311708,0.96649104,0.0014790049,0.00077609415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076597795,0.00007071027,0.0000033792126,0.0003974394,0.00029047302,8.6663294e-7,0.00036645823,0.00001265061,0.000009003431,0.29375646,0.70415306,0.0001735434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018330801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004190749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70267403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008526787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003684929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99829423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W998192189","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139035217.009","title":"New Kinds of Subjective Uncertainty?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04828418737801474,"score_gpt":0.20967694683130705,"score_spread":0.16139275945329232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W998192189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001565182,0.00019543387,0.000098176955,0.000024546964,0.0007532468,0.00036557534,0.00037735997,0.0000812771,0.9979479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025531205,0.000068074005,0.0000531957,0.00009535592,0.0006603632,5.225842e-7,0.000060806273,0.000047267942,0.9964613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881285,0.00005003494,0.00024183188,0.00039896055,0.00024103672,0.0002552704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983322,0.00014547039,0.00040480602,0.000491317,0.00047094136,0.0001552591],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000091881666,0.00036698583,0.0006124571,0.00017256627,0.00020969745,0.000045637214,0.0004552051,0.0003696659,0.00017927137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009943003,0.0003959241,0.00035741692,0.0000028346922,0.0009826975,0.00011362676,0.00020070044,0.00062234176,0.00005858749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004848577,0.000008160592,5.143705e-7,0.00011874273,0.0002899857,0.00002649643,0.0027441937,0.0000011731693,0.000012851758,0.9265372,0.069202304,0.0010098796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043674104,0.0001067139,0.0000036503714,0.00015730274,0.00033531975,0.0000022325798,0.0005789467,0.0000054828497,0.00015389938,0.0009348519,0.9968921,0.00039274132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052035083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001775361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9276898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001114575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025929156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}